The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewFred Reed Archive
Mexico, as It Is and Wasn’t
Some Stuff Worth Knowing
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_756009604

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

For Americans concerned about Mexico and Mexicans, and what sort of wights they be, a little history may help. We seem to know almost nothing about a bordering nation of 130 million. It is not what most of us think it is. It is certainly not what the Loon Right would have us believe.

For many years, until 1910, Mexico was run by Europeans, lastly under Porfirio Diaz, for the benefit of Europeans. Literacy was extremely low with economic conditions to match. The country was indeed, to borrow a favorite phrase of those hostile to Latin Americans, a Third-World hellhole. Many nations then were, including China.

In 1910 the Revolution broke out. It was godawful, as civil wars usually are. It ended in 1921, followed shortly by the Cristero religious war until 1929. This had the usual hideousness favored by religious wars.

It left the country devastated. It hadn’t been much to start with, but now it was a wreck. Aldous Huxley, writing in 1934, saw no improvement. (Beyond the Mexique Bay) At least until 1940 much of Mexico was barely civilized, unlettered, lawless, and poor. Things were not all that swell in 1970.

Today, seventy-six years later (says the CIA Factbook), literacy is at 95%; the economy at $2.2 trillion, 12th in the world in PPP; median age, 28; population growth rate, 1.12%; mother’s mean age at first birth, 21.3; total fertility, 2.24 children per woman; life expectancy at birth, 76 years.

Mexico today has a large number of universities (the Technológico of Monterrey, a premier engineering school, has some thirty campuses in as many cities: Is that one university or thirty?) Mexico graduates well over 100,000 engineers a year, including 13,000 in software, and has a rapidly growing high-tech industry with centers in Guadalajara and Mexico City. Major American firms, to include IBM, Oracle, and Intel, come here to hire them.

And of course the internet, airlines, computerized everything, and teenagers pecking at smartphones.

This is a lot of change in less than a man’s lifetime. Those hostile to Latin Americans do not want to know this, and usually manage not to.

In many ways Mexico remains a mess, mostly because of organized crime and corruption. Distribution of wealth is badly unequal, being now what the US is becoming. Books could be written about what is wrong with the country. Finland it isn’t. But neither is it remotely a “Third-World hell hole” despite the squalling of such authorities as Ann Coulter, Manhattan’s premier she-ass.

It would be a good idea to retire the phrase, “Third World.” Any designation that includes both Buenos Aires and Haiti (I have spent time in the slums of Cite Soleil with the US Army) is so broad as to be without meaning. In 1930, China, Mexico, Thailand and so on could reasonably have been called hellholes. None of these even comes close today. The slums of India do, as does much of Africa, yes.

To grasp the degree of educational advance between the Mexico as it was as of 1940 and today, look at what is visible on the ground:

Go into an ordinary bank, with which Mexico is littered. The clerks have to understand exchange rates, intermediate banks, SWIFT codes. They sit at computers, which are networked within the bank and with national headquarters, requiring network engineers and software weenies. Multitudinous ATMs require network people and maintainers. Telmex, the quite good telephone monopoly, needs people to program and maintain switches and associated software. So do TelCel and ATT, cell-phone providers. Airlines need pilots and trainers of pilots, people to run and maintain high-bypass turbofans and avionics, the instrument-landing systems (ILS). The internet needs software people, router techs, help-line techs when someone’s modem fails (the techs are good). Also doctors and dentists, universities to train them, people who understand and maintain MRI gear, the usual elaborate diagnostic instrumentation, mechanics to run the diagnostic computers at car dealerships and understand what lurks under the hoods of today’s cars (which would baffle Stephen Hawking). And so on at great length. Similar observations could be made of many Latin American and Asian countries. Starting from roughly zero a few decades ago.

Anyone who actually lives here can see that the country continues to change at a high rate. The middle class grows. Internet speeds keep going up. Despite the ardent hopes of many web sites of the Loon Right, you do not come down with exotic diseases, or any diseases, by eating in restaurants. Schooling increases. Common is a mother, age forty with ten siblings, who has two children, both in university or tech schools. None of this is universal, but increasingly common. This in not up there with, say, a manned landing on Mars, but it is hardly consistent with stone-age hell-holedom.

What Mexicans are not, yet anyway, is driven in the sense that Americans often are. Young Mexican engineers are more so, but not the general population. A Mexican girl–to use an example I know–will go to dental school and then stay in her home town, however small, marry, fix teeth, and raise children. Mexicans seem less entrepreneurial than Americans. They tend to regard a job as a way of supporting a family instead of the other way around.

There is considerable social mobility, at least around the cities. Women start businesses here, often restaurants, stores, bars, or maybe assisted-care homes in regions favored by retired Americans (e.g., Lakeside Care, down the street), but seem content with enough. “Enough” means something to them that it often does not to Americans. Whether this is good or bad can be debated, but it makes for contentedness but not commercial empires.

ORDER IT NOW

How will the new Mexican-American population adapt to the United States? I don’t know. Neither does anyone else, though many who know nothing about it have firm opinions. Will the government turn them into a sprawling class of welfare dependents? Doubtless if it can. Will furiously hostile anti-immigrant lobbies make them into internal enemies? They want to, and it would be the end of the US.

Or will they clamber, rapidly or otherwise, into the middle class and cease to be of much interest? The latter, I think. An intelligent policy would be to encourage them, but we can do it anyway. They are pretty good people, not given to terrorism or mutilating their daughters or the knockout game, and they burn a minimum of cities. Everywhere I have been–LA, San Fran, DC, Huston, San Antonio, Pilsen and Berwyn in Chicago–they have seemed to be settling peacefully in. They have the potential to make it. We had better hope they get there.

(Republished from Fred on Everything by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Economics, History • Tags: Hispanics, Immigration, Mexico 
Hide 179 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Why is organized crime such a feature, then? In many ways, it doesn’t sound like even a state that has control over areas of itself.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    too much money in drugs. look at what we are willing to do for oil? the drug trade is like a smaller version of it.
    , @Anon
    Because the state itself is involved in the organized crime, that's why.
    , @LauraMR
    Then?

    Do you mean Fred lied about his representation of Mexico?

    If so, please provide the information that proves those universities/graduates, banks, etc, in short, the infrastructure and demographics he describes do not in fact exist.

    I'm curious.
    , @LauraMR
    Then?

    Do you mean Fred lied about his representation of Mexico?

    If so, please provide the information that proves those universities/graduates, banks, etc, in short, the infrastructure and demographics he describes do not in fact exist.

    I'm curious.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /freed/mexico-as-it-is-and-wasnt/#comment-2081197
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Brabantian says: • Website

    With a positive experience of Mexicans myself, I share some of Fred’s thinking, and see favourable Mexican-Anglo relations as a good thing for North America’s future … but my guess is that for some readers here, their impression of the Spanish-speaking presence in the USA is a little more along the lines of this photo of an expressive pretty Latina

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jim Christian
    Hateful, depraved, overly privileged Latina. Pretty? Pretty enough to grudge-fuck.
    , @O'Coner
    That's because as Fred's saying, the MSM shares that (absolutely genuine) photo nationally. But Border Patrol's continuous confrontations with 'activists' stationed at the border, throwing rocks and such to try to foment an incident are only reported locally. I've seen many many incidents. Example : I saw BP evict a trailer encampment in Jacumba Ca. (nice SPA) around 2004. They said they we're affiliated with a well known org. They sat around, well armed, drank beer, cussed mexicans, and threw rock. They eventually hit some people on the other side with rocks and BP who has been surrrounding them moved in and, I believe charges were filed. Locals, (perhaps, excepting beer and ammo merchants) were pleased. This incident was well publicized locally. Coincidentally, I haven't heard much about the militia style border helper 'activist' organizations since that confrontation. This is all easy to confirm. But you have to look for it! :-(
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Deconstructing some myths that less informed American nativists might have about Mexico and middle-income countries generally = good.

    Tacking on the political opinion in the last two paragraphs in an overly blunt manner = detracts from that.

    And looks pretty weird, anyway. Why should a Mexican patriot such as yourself care about Mexicans’ immigration prospects in the US?

    Better approach that would have spared you extra writing and readers’ ire: Note that net Mexican – as in, Mexican citizen – immigration to the US has been negligible in the past decade. Can also convert that into another bit of evidence for increasing relative quality of life there.

    Read More
    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Wow, what a condescending tool you are.

    Who exactly are you to correct anyone? Your writings are barely distinguishable from some random 4chan poster. "Oh noes! Muh white race!"

    Do everyone a favor. If you have something to say, say it on your own blog. If you disagree, then disagree. Don't be all smug and tell others what to write like you are a somebody. Because you are not.

    By the way, you too are an immigrant to my country. What makes (((you))) so much better than a Mexican? I would much rather have Lopez than Karlin anyday.

    Recap....

    Uncle Anatoly not telling others what to say = good.

    Uncle Anatoly menstruating in other people's columns = detracts from that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. I was in Mexico in 2008 and later 2014. It was very different than when I visited in 1984-1985. In the 80′s, Mexico was stereotypical Mexico. Today, it looks and feels like Malaysia (penag, KL), but without the Islam.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Steve-O says:

    OK, Fred, we get it, Mexico isn’t Haiti or the Congo. How many times are you going to beat down this anti-Mexican straw man?

    That being said, some food for thought:

    http://mexiconewsdaily.com/news/mexico-third-most-dangerous-country/

    http://takimag.com/article/gentrifiers_prefer_blondes_david_cole#axzz4ydKfjycB

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/06/opinion/the-country-that-stopped-reading.html

    Read More
    • Agree: Triumph104
    • Replies: @Anon
    That article by Cole is interesting but he fails to mention that the fusion of leftism and tribalism in the US owes much to Jewish influences. After all, most Jews were both on the 'left' and Zionist.

    And my beef is not with gentrification per se. Rather, it's that white/Jews gentrifiers dump their problem on OTHER communities.
    They relocate blacks to other communities made up of peoples fleeing black crime and pathologies.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. It’s amusing how Fred Reed is unable to praise Mexico without taking numerous swipes at the United States. I’ve noticed the Brits and Irish do this as well. Maybe Fred is picking up their trolling style. Or maybe he’s from Anglo-Irish stock.

    If you can’t praise Mexico without running down others, then I say your credibility is shot. You have an agenda, plain and simple. You’re the Baghdad Bob of Lake Chapala.

    Then there’s this: “Will furiously hostile anti-immigrant lobbies make them into internal enemies? They want to, and it would be the end of the US.”

    How so? The U.S. did great when it was 90% white, and in fact our standard of living was the highest in the world. Mechanized grape and cherry and lettuce pickers are turning Mexicans into obsolete farm equipment. To suggest they provide absolutely vital services that cannot be replicated by U.S. citizens is incredibly fatuous.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    You have an agenda, plain and simple. You’re the Baghdad Bob of Lake Chapala.
     
    Haha. Very true. Even the image he chose for the article is classic propaganda.

    The US whites are being forced to surrender their own country to the lower IQ strangers with vastly different sensibilities and loyalties. The same is happening in Europe but faster and with much worse invaders. This is neither accidental or hidden. The globalists are fairly open about their plan to see the white race disappear and the brown "guests" are happy to oblige.

    Fred is basically channelling Sadiq Khan:

    - "Most beaners are good people" - Yes, of course, but this is true for every country in the World - if one bothers to visit. Most people just want to live in peace and prosper. The problem arises when you move millions of them into another, smarter country, where they form a distinct, semi-permanent underclass. That average 88 IQ immigrant beaner is suddenly finding himself at the bottom of the socio-economic totem pole. In Mexico he was happy and "good" but in the US he's unsatisfied and not so good natured (surprisingly enough, a person's happiness is closely linked to their position in the surrounding human ecosystem). His 88 IQ son will be even worse since he'd be lacking his father's sense of accomplishment when he moved to the US. He's starting at the bottom of his ecosystem and the globalists are ready to teach him about the evils of white man.

    - "Mexico is not that bad" - Who cares. Just stay there and enjoy. The underlying assumption that the population is as capable as any other is obviously wrong but you don't get the right to mass-migrate regardless. People are a territorial species for a reason.

    - "Don't criticise the beaners or else" - This one is classic Khan and probably the dumbest argument on the list. Why the fuck would anyone import millions of people who are prone to become hostile when criticised? Are we on the same planet? This "reasoning" can only lead to further misery and polarisation. The goal is, of course, to pacify the host population and victim-blame them to extinction.

    , @Thomm

    How so? The U.S. did great when it was 90% white, and in fact our standard of living was the highest in the world.
     
    There was never a time like this. The time you are referring to (1925-1975) was also when Italians, Poles, and Jews were not considered white.

    Sure it was 85% white under TODAY's definition of 'white', but not under the contemporary definition of 'white'. This is what WN idiots never grasp.

    Under the 1870 definition of 'white', only 20% of Americans are white (even Irish were excluded from this definition). But in the future, Hispanics in Asians will be reclassified as 'white', and White Nationalists will go along with it, just like they did in the past.

    Texas, always ahead of the curve, declared that the Texas definition of white is that 'anyone who is not black, is white', which also ties to what Steve Sailer pointed out about African vs. non-African genetics.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. Truth says:

    Read More
    • Replies: @mobi
    Like applying for a job, say?

    Or trying to pick up a beautiful girl?

    Or conducting yet another experiment to try to discover useful new insights into the nature of the physical world (when your last one hundred experiments failed, as they do)?

    Or, ....

    A remarkably moronic definition of insanity, it is.

    But it must be true, because everyone keeps saying so, and attaching the name Einstein to it!

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Quelle surprise, Federico Rojo is at it again.

    Doubtless Senor Rojo is correct, Mexico has improved considerably. So has nearly the entire Third World barring Haiti, Venezuela, Yemen, and a few African countries (and I do mean a few–most really have improved considerably).

    This isn’t even entirely new, not even in Mexico. In fact under Porfirio Diaz Mexico experienced swift economic growth and social development (at the expense of rural peasants–hence the revolution).

    But as all of Federico’s commenters know but he refuses to admit (owing to the siren spell of seduction cast by his swarthy temptress), none of this indicates that the mass of Mexicans are in any way equal to Americans.

    Or more importantly–desired. It’s our country, we decide who gets to join it.

    They want to, and it would be the end of the US.

    The end of the US? What, are these people Federico himself admits are not terribly enterprising going to defeat us on the battlefield?

    No, it will be the end of our long national nightmare. Some fraction of Mexicans may even remain after the dust settles and join us, while many others will be summarily ejected.

    The Mexican patriot who pens these screeds will no doubt be delighted that so many brilliant potential engineers are returning home to make Mexico great again.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. Go into an ordinary bank, with which Mexico is littered. The clerks have to understand exchange rates, intermediate banks, SWIFT codes. They sit at computers, which are networked within the bank and with national headquarters, requiring network engineers and software weenies. Multitudinous ATMs require network people and maintainers. Telmex, the quite good telephone monopoly, needs people to program and maintain switches and associated software. So do TelCel and ATT, cell-phone providers. Airlines need pilots and trainers of pilots, people to run and maintain high-bypass turbofans and avionics, the instrument-landing systems (ILS). The internet needs software people, router techs, help-line techs when someone’s modem fails (the techs are good). Also doctors and dentists, universities to train them, people who understand and maintain MRI gear, the usual elaborate diagnostic instrumentation, mechanics to run the diagnostic computers at car dealerships and understand what lurks under the hoods of today’s cars (which would baffle Stephen Hawking). And so on at great length. Similar observations could be made of many Latin American and Asian countries. Starting from roughly zero a few decades ago.

    Someone needs to remind Fred that, as one American politico notoriously put it, “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best.”

    Seriously, how does Fred imagine Mexico would react if America dumped the bottom ten percent of its population on Mexico, who not only crowded Mexicans out of their own cities, but insisted on speaking English instead of Spanish and celebrating the fourth of July instead of cinco de mayo?

    Read More
    • Agree: Travis
    • Replies: @Bragadocious
    Seriously, how does Fred imagine Mexico would react if America dumped the bottom ten percent of its population on Mexico

    Well we did give them Fred. (Sorry Mexico!)
    , @fred c dobbs
    well done...very well done.......as i have been saying for over two decades now (and i live in SoCal, so I know a bit about these things first hand)......what we get are overwhelmingly NOT the best and brightest, or even the AVERAGE. We get Mexico's West Virginia and Mississippi.
    , @Michelle
    Recent article recommended to me by Google

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/08/us/california-today-the-latino-education-crisis.html
    , @yeah
    Re the constant refrain "when Mexico sends its people it doesn't send its best".

    First of all, Mexico doesn't SEND anyone or anything: not people, not air, not even postcards. Emails and letters are sent, goods sold are sent (by ship, air, or truck), and livestock may be sent when sold. No Sir, people are NOT sent, because they, like wind, simply blow in through borders made porous, or drift past poorly manned borders, and sometimes whoosh in through the crevices. If air blows into your home, don't blame the wind, blame your own negligence in shutting the windows or the shoddy workmanship of your builders.

    The Joe Blows blowing in from Mexico are just that: ordinary people looking to better their lives. In planned and managed numbers and quality, their influx can be mutually beneficial. As hordes of illegals, they are nothing but a disaster in the making.

    If the Democrats, the courts, the cute progressives, and the loony left have thrown open all windows, why blame those who then come in? A lot of dislike of Mexico is based on defective logic. Fault those who undermine laws and immigration control at home, not Mexico.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. @silviosilver

    Go into an ordinary bank, with which Mexico is littered. The clerks have to understand exchange rates, intermediate banks, SWIFT codes. They sit at computers, which are networked within the bank and with national headquarters, requiring network engineers and software weenies. Multitudinous ATMs require network people and maintainers. Telmex, the quite good telephone monopoly, needs people to program and maintain switches and associated software. So do TelCel and ATT, cell-phone providers. Airlines need pilots and trainers of pilots, people to run and maintain high-bypass turbofans and avionics, the instrument-landing systems (ILS). The internet needs software people, router techs, help-line techs when someone’s modem fails (the techs are good). Also doctors and dentists, universities to train them, people who understand and maintain MRI gear, the usual elaborate diagnostic instrumentation, mechanics to run the diagnostic computers at car dealerships and understand what lurks under the hoods of today’s cars (which would baffle Stephen Hawking). And so on at great length. Similar observations could be made of many Latin American and Asian countries. Starting from roughly zero a few decades ago.
     
    Someone needs to remind Fred that, as one American politico notoriously put it, "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best."

    Seriously, how does Fred imagine Mexico would react if America dumped the bottom ten percent of its population on Mexico, who not only crowded Mexicans out of their own cities, but insisted on speaking English instead of Spanish and celebrating the fourth of July instead of cinco de mayo?

    Seriously, how does Fred imagine Mexico would react if America dumped the bottom ten percent of its population on Mexico

    Well we did give them Fred. (Sorry Mexico!)

    Read More
    • Replies: @silviosilver
    Fred is an asset to them. The way he incessantly talks up Mexicans, I wouldn't be surprised to learn he's in el Presidente's employ.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Lay off the Mexico stuff Fred. I’ve read most of FOE and find your writing style and depth of knowledge on many subjects to be entertaining and educational. But you are flogging a dead horse when it comes to being an apologist for anything Mexican. Until Mexico solves it problem with the drug dealers and their deadly impact on the lives of Mexican citizens, it will always carry the stigma of being a corrupt third world country no matter how many engineers it graduates .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. @Bragadocious
    Seriously, how does Fred imagine Mexico would react if America dumped the bottom ten percent of its population on Mexico

    Well we did give them Fred. (Sorry Mexico!)

    Fred is an asset to them. The way he incessantly talks up Mexicans, I wouldn’t be surprised to learn he’s in el Presidente’s employ.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. KenH says:

    Will furiously hostile anti-immigrant lobbies make them into internal enemies? They want to, and it would be the end of the US.

    It was only a matter of time before Freddy took a dump on white Americans who have the temerity to oppose their nation being turned into a Mexican colony. In most of his articles he always makes a point to unload a little excrement and guilt tripping on whites who don’t accept his pollyanna views of Mestizos in Mexico and America.

    Generally, Mexican-Americans are not as hostile towards whites and insufferable as blacks are, but there are still problems and tension and that is largely the fault of Mexicans. For starters, the presence of illegal aliens, who are mostly the genetic wastrels of Mexico, has destroyed many smaller towns and cities and with it, the good will of the white citizens who used to think they were so hard working and friendly when they were but a small minority. Gangs and juvenile delinquency are a serious problem within the Mexican community and they’ve made areas of cities very dangerous for non-Mexicans (note: but their racial terror against blacks is poetic justice).

    They have many racial organizations that are highly antagonistic towards white Americans and there’s no shortage of Mexican politicians who are race baiting firebrands. Exhibit A is La Raza and Tom Perez, head of the DNC.

    So sorry Fred, contrary to your wet dreams and propaganda, most Mexicans have not come to America with the best of intentions and to assimilate. Rather, they’ve come to recreate large and small little Mexico’s inside the United States while reaping the largesse and government services that are the hallmarks of prosperous white nations.

    Read More
    • Agree: SMK
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    Fred has chosen his side and it wasn't the Whites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. vx37 says:

    They’ll put leftists in power and those leftists will rape the First and Second Amendments to death. Deal with that reality, Freddie boy. Centuries of struggle, with countless lives lost, for these gems of Western civilization exchanged for the “pleasure” of multi-racialism and multiculturalism. Freedom exchanged for nothing but misery and burden.

    Your bitterness at not being able to get quality white pussy isn’t a legitimate socio-political position, Fred. I’ve never met a white person who married a non-white who was quite mentally sound. I’m sure they exist but they are the rare exception.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. Mr Fred you explain your people how the cost of living in México is lower than USA, many Americans are here in Old Mexico for this very simple reason; how many Americans are living in Mexico just for this reason, thousands and many more are coming; Mr. Fred ask your people why nobody in America takes care for this senior people, ain´t they their brothers, they are not living in Mexico just for fun they miss their country and nobody miss them they just call those people in need…. traitors. but who is the real traitor?. those senior Americans are welcome in Mexico.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    Yeah, it'll all work out pretty well for you senior ex-pats until the US dollar goes down the toilet. You'd best put your money into something tangible if it is not too risky, or at least other currencies. There are a lot of places to stash your loot in the Sierra Madre, as I learned from a movie one time.
    , @TheJester
    Our Mexican friends (still illegal), tell us that the lower cost of living in Mexico is an illusion. It may be lower for dollar-based gringos ... but Mexicans in the peso-based economy have a hard row of it. Our friends, an architect and university instructor in Mexico, lived in a small two-bedroom apartment in Mexico City and drove a broken-down VW beetle. She cleans houses and he waits tables in the United States ... and they believe they have a much higher quality of life in the United States than in Mexico.

    The thing that really gets them about Mexico ... is the pervasive violence. Fred mentions ATMs. Our friend says that in Mexico an armored car servicing ATMs is, in fact, two armored cars with ten guards carrying military-grade automatic weapons. He is amazed that in our community it is one armored car with two guys carrying pistols.

    She says that the violence in Mexico City is so pervasive that a mother cannot, in safety, take her baby to the local park for a stroll. On the contrary, we live in a "lake" community with finely manicured public areas, including networks of paths around the lakes. Having lived here for 19 years, we cannot recall one instance of anyone being assaulted, mugged, or worse on the lakes and paths.

    Our friends in a sense voted with their feet in the choice between their way of life in the United States and their way of life in Mexico.

    For a perspective on violence in Mexico, it might be useful if Fred referenced the State Department's travel advisories on Mexico. Most of the country, including the popular resorts in Cancun, Cozumel, Playa del Carmen, Riviera Maya, and Tulum are on notice.

    https://travel.state.gov/content/passports/en/alertswarnings/mexico-travel-warning.html
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. TheBoom says:

    Fred views Mexico through Gringo glasses . All but one Mexican I met when living there – rich to working class – would rather live in the US. The cab drivers would almost all repeat verbatim “in the US if you work hard, you get ahead. Not Mexico!” There is a very widespread frustration with a culture of corruption and “mediocrity” and a strong belief that everything is stacked against the average person.

    Take away remittances from Mexicans living in the US (which are a major segment of the economy) and all the (formerly US) jobs that have been created through NAFTA and Mexico would be in trouble. They are being propped up at the expense of the American worker. Without the sacrifice of the US working class, Mexico would have to be build a real economy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @aandrews
    "Take away remittances from Mexicans living in the US...and all the...jobs that have been created through NAFTA and Mexico would be in trouble."

    Yeah, Fred. Why don't you take Mexico and shove it up your ass.
    , @renfro
    ' Mexico's central bank reported Mexicans overseas sent nearly $24.8 billion home in 2015, overtaking oil revenues for the first time as a source of foreign income.

    Remittances were up 4.75 percent from 2014 when they totaled $23.6 billion, the Bank of Mexico said.'

    Most remittances are used for immediate consumption -- food, housing, health care, education -- but some collective remittances, sent from Mexican migrants in the U.S. to their community of origin, are used for shared projects and infrastructure improvements under Mexico’s “3 for 1” program that matches contributions with federal, state, and local funds.''


    That is close to 10% of Mexico revenues to best of memory.....someone can look it up and tell me if thats wrong.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. Rounding out the top three undesirables, all for quite different reasons:

    1. Negros – No Explanation Necessary
    2. Moslems – While perhaps fine people, their religion and customs are a poor fit for North America. They as a group are also notoriously thin skinned, any perceived insult to them regarding their race, religion, Koran, customs, etc. does not end well up to and including outright jihad or enlistment of quasi-powerful liberal types in defense of these qualities. Anyone who has worked around moslems, particularly at the lower end of the blue collar world is well aware of their fiery nature defending “their rights” or straight out shit talking the country they find themselves in.
    3. Jews – These are people who refuse to labor, have tribal over national or continental allegiance, have an outsized interest in careers in law, government and finance, and generally cannot function if they are not somehow figuring out a way to rule over, influence, propagandize or fleece someone not belonging to their tribe, otherwise known as the “mark” or “goy”. When #2 on this list gets a burr under his saddle from a native, it is typically a #3 leading the charge in the legal system to chastise and punish them to whatever extent a judge, jury, politician or media outlet can be invited to do so. #3′s are relentless in their pursuit of teaching marks that the only thing worse than crossing a #2 is crossing a #3. They have successfully achieved legal remedy in most countries other than the US for any language natives employ that agitates them. They have made sure that they have their own special offense that is based on public confession of distaste for them called anti-semitism that in today’s politically correct climate can only be exceeded by public admission of distaste for #1′s. Human liberty is not something this group is particularly in to, seeing as they prefer using all the various tools of the state to remedy their ills, and any opportunities to expand the size and scope of the government are music to their collective ears.

    Latin Americans, particularly the continental varieties are not bad when they come in a trickle. Interestingly enough the island varieties, while they look down their noses at the continental latins, have a predominante percentage of worthless whiny stock. Take the Puerto Rican’s for instance, they largely fled from their homeland after the hurricane only to point the finger at the United States government as the problem actor.

    Read More
    • Replies: @silviosilver

    Latin Americans, particularly the continental varieties are not bad when they come in a trickle.
     
    The pessimist in me wants to say that you know the game is lost when even immigration skeptics fumble this badly, even if they're just doing it in order to sound moderate.

    The reality is that unless you want to some day be completely overrun, you have to cut the immigration flow off completely. There is simply no other way.

    Whether the flow is a trickle or a flood hardly makes a difference in this respect (although the former is of course more bearable, or at least seems so). Drip by drip, your bathtub will eventually overflow, unless you turn off the tap.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Will the government turn them into a sprawling class of welfare dependents? Doubtless if it can.

    Whaaaa? I really didn’t disagree with your article until this last part. What do you mean, will they? Most of them already are, at least partially.

    I can’t really improve upon most of the comments here, but I too wonder why you keep up this writing that belongs in a Mexican Chamber of Commerce brochure. I enjoyed your article on diving last week, but it didn’t get many comments. I now think that you are just writing articles to create the most controversy for the unz comment section. Is it all about the pesos, Fred?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. @Rio Grande
    Mr Fred you explain your people how the cost of living in México is lower than USA, many Americans are here in Old Mexico for this very simple reason; how many Americans are living in Mexico just for this reason, thousands and many more are coming; Mr. Fred ask your people why nobody in America takes care for this senior people, ain´t they their brothers, they are not living in Mexico just for fun they miss their country and nobody miss them they just call those people in need.... traitors. but who is the real traitor?. those senior Americans are welcome in Mexico.

    Yeah, it’ll all work out pretty well for you senior ex-pats until the US dollar goes down the toilet. You’d best put your money into something tangible if it is not too risky, or at least other currencies. There are a lot of places to stash your loot in the Sierra Madre, as I learned from a movie one time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Just another observation: A large contingent of native white American people have embraced the cultural rot largely emanated en masse by the #3′s and their associates and fellow ideological travelers, and it is many of the good Christian Mexicans who these days care for their aging parents, particularly the absentee native whites who have fled their hometowns for the metros but have not made it big enough to put their parents in nursing homes. We can preen and shit talk latins all day long, but they maintain much stronger family ties, and to some degree, particularly their women, continue to possess traits that a large contingent of our women sold out long ago. Furthermore, they did so with the blessing and encouragement of our most esteemed leadership. I hope we rid our nation of these nefarious actors, but I’m not holding my breath.

    There comes a point where financialization, media, hype, marketing, keeping up with the Jones’s, etc will no longer cover for our people’s glaring deficiencies in these areas. Looking at the latest debt numbers from the St Louis FED, it appears the deficient contingent is back up to their eyeballs in debt, so don’t expect any big changes in their behavior.

    Sad commentary on our side of the fence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @hyperbola
    There is a natural fit between "conservative" anglos and "conservative" latinos in that they share many social values. Your citation of family values is one example. The two groups would probably be best served by joining together to champion those values against the efforts of #3s to destroy them. Perhaps much of the anti-mexican rhetoric that exists in America is in reality sponsored by #3s as a divide and conquer mechanism?

    Anglos might do well to remember that many of their finest achievements have roots in the "latin" world of Europe. For example, the Republic of Venice had a parliament and president (doge) elected by universal suffrage over 300 years before the Brits got around to declaring "rights for aristocrats" (Magna Carta). There are reasons why the english language is so full of spanish-language words like: constitucion, libertad, legal, ......
    , @silviosilver

    We can preen and shit talk latins all day long, but they maintain much stronger family ties, and to some degree, particularly their women, continue to possess traits that a large contingent of our women sold out long ago.
     
    Big effing deal. Muslims have even stronger family ties and even greater sexual modesty, but I somehow doubt you're going to hold them up as model citizens.
    , @AnotherDad

    We can preen and shit talk latins all day long, but they maintain much stronger family ties, and to some degree, particularly their women, continue to possess traits that a large contingent of our women sold out long ago.
     
    "Hispanics" in the US--that's dominated by the Mexicans--have a 50%+ illegitimacy rate. That's compared to something in the high 20s for whites.

    These numbers bounce around from year to year--with a general upward trend. But for 2014--the most recent data that popped for me--
    Illegitimacy:
    black -- 71.2%
    Mexican origin -- 51.6%
    non-Hispanic white 29.2%
    Asian -- 16.4%

    They may have had strong family ties, but Mexican women are hardly showing "positive traits". They look to be even sluttier and sloppier--and more civilization destroying--than white women.

    ~

    Here's the CDC page i'm taking these numbers from:
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_12.pdf
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. syonredux says:

    Will furiously hostile anti-immigrant lobbies make them into internal enemies? They want to, and it would be the end of the US.

    Dunno, Fred. What about SJW grievance-mongers?You know, the people who want to divide the USA into two halves, evil White Anglos on one side, saintly POC (Blacks, Hispanics, etc) on the other? And those guys actually have the elites on their side…..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. Issac says:

    One could forgive the Americans deciding they’d rather opt for a path of destruction and disintegration than willingly capitulate to a quasi-peaceful invasion. Any nationalist worth his salt would, anyway.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. “It is certainly not what the Loon Right would have us believe.”

    That’s Dissident-Right to you, bucko!

    If everything’s so great, you think Mexico would want to build the wall to keep us out.

    I was once banned from the Bob Grant radio show in the 1990s for suggesting the US use the crisis of ’94-95 to do a leveraged buyout of Mexico. $10k for every man, woman, and child plus debt foregiveness would have sealed the deal. As with so many other things, I was right, and Bob is now dead.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. Travis says:

    Mexico deports more hispanics each year than the United States….would be interested to see Fred discuss how Mexicans treat illegal aliens. It is in stark contrast to the treatment we give to Mexicans here in America, where they are welcomed, granted amnesty, given free health care, allowed to obtain drivers licenses, granted free education to their children, food stamps, affirmative action to give them preferences etc…

    When I lived in Mexico , for 3 months in 1994 , I was stopped by the police several times and forced to show my papers….again I lived in Mexico for 6 weeks in 1996 and was again stopped twice by the police asking for my documents. My traveling companions also were stopped at various points in time during our travels in Mexico. Why not do an article on how Mexico mistreats foreigners ? They still prohibit Americans from buying land within 100 miles of the coast.

    Read More
    • Replies: @hyperbola
    What you say is partly true.

    Buying Property in Mexico | How To Buy a House in Mexico
    https://www.globalpropertyguide.com/Latin-America/Mexico/Buying-Guide

    ..... In 1973, a constitutional amendment known as the Foreign Investment Law allowed foreigners to purchase real estate anywhere in Mexico except the restricted zone that consists of areas within 100 km (64 miles) of international borders or within 50 km (32 miles) from the coastline at high tide. In 1993, Mexico amended the constitution to allow foreigners to purchase real estate within the restricted zone by means of a fideicomiso.

    The fideicomiso is a bank trust wherein the bank (trustee) holds the trust deed for the purchaser (beneficiary). While the trustee is the legal owner of the real estate, the beneficiary retains all ownership rights and responsibilities and may sell, lease, mortgage, and pass the property on to heirs. The fideicomiso is authorized by the Mexican Government under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.....
    _________________________________________________________________

    That system is actually better than the "leasehold" systems that the Brits run (you can only own/sell a lease on the property). Americans in places like NYC, Silicon Valley, ...... might also be better off with a legal system that protects them from foreign property speculators.
    , @silviosilver

    would be interested to see Fred discuss how Mexicans treat illegal aliens.
     
    I'm sure he would disapprove of the practice and warn Mexicans that their policy on illegals risks breaking up the Mexican state.

    Right, Fred?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. DWright says:

    Enough of these Fred, who are you trying to convince?
    Hope it works out for you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  26. hyperbola says:
    @Linda Green
    Just another observation: A large contingent of native white American people have embraced the cultural rot largely emanated en masse by the #3's and their associates and fellow ideological travelers, and it is many of the good Christian Mexicans who these days care for their aging parents, particularly the absentee native whites who have fled their hometowns for the metros but have not made it big enough to put their parents in nursing homes. We can preen and shit talk latins all day long, but they maintain much stronger family ties, and to some degree, particularly their women, continue to possess traits that a large contingent of our women sold out long ago. Furthermore, they did so with the blessing and encouragement of our most esteemed leadership. I hope we rid our nation of these nefarious actors, but I'm not holding my breath.

    There comes a point where financialization, media, hype, marketing, keeping up with the Jones's, etc will no longer cover for our people's glaring deficiencies in these areas. Looking at the latest debt numbers from the St Louis FED, it appears the deficient contingent is back up to their eyeballs in debt, so don't expect any big changes in their behavior.

    Sad commentary on our side of the fence.

    There is a natural fit between “conservative” anglos and “conservative” latinos in that they share many social values. Your citation of family values is one example. The two groups would probably be best served by joining together to champion those values against the efforts of #3s to destroy them. Perhaps much of the anti-mexican rhetoric that exists in America is in reality sponsored by #3s as a divide and conquer mechanism?

    Anglos might do well to remember that many of their finest achievements have roots in the “latin” world of Europe. For example, the Republic of Venice had a parliament and president (doge) elected by universal suffrage over 300 years before the Brits got around to declaring “rights for aristocrats” (Magna Carta). There are reasons why the english language is so full of spanish-language words like: constitucion, libertad, legal, ……

    Read More
    • Replies: @silviosilver

    Anglos might do well to remember that many of their finest achievements have roots in the “latin” world of Europe. For example, the Republic of Venice had a parliament and president (doge) elected by universal suffrage over 300 years before the Brits got around to declaring “rights for aristocrats” (Magna Carta). There are reasons why the english language is so full of spanish-language words like: constitucion, libertad, legal, ……
     
    God Almighty the lengths shysters like you will go to to foist utterly useless immigrants on America. You are insufferable.
    , @Logan
    For example, the Republic of Venice had a parliament and president (doge) elected by universal suffrage over 300 years before the Brits got around to declaring “rights for aristocrats” (Magna Carta).

    Not hardly! The doge was always elected by the aristos, but at first there was a pretense of seeking the acquiescence of the people, as with the pope. This was dropped completely in 1423.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doge_of_Venice


    The Great Council was also clearly and explicitly an aristocratic and hereditary body, not an elected parliament.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Council_of_Venice
    , @renfro
    '' There are reasons why the english language is so full of spanish-language words like: constitucion, libertad, legal, ……''>>>


    OMG....... it never ends....if its not the Jews claiming something descended from them , its the blacks claiming they built America and the Latinos doing the same.

    Those words are not "English language words' ....and all the various words for 'liberty' came from the Greek Latin libertat-, libertas.....Not Latin America for gawds sake.
    In English its 'liberty', in French its Liberté,
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. hyperbola says:
    @Travis
    Mexico deports more hispanics each year than the United States....would be interested to see Fred discuss how Mexicans treat illegal aliens. It is in stark contrast to the treatment we give to Mexicans here in America, where they are welcomed, granted amnesty, given free health care, allowed to obtain drivers licenses, granted free education to their children, food stamps, affirmative action to give them preferences etc...

    When I lived in Mexico , for 3 months in 1994 , I was stopped by the police several times and forced to show my papers....again I lived in Mexico for 6 weeks in 1996 and was again stopped twice by the police asking for my documents. My traveling companions also were stopped at various points in time during our travels in Mexico. Why not do an article on how Mexico mistreats foreigners ? They still prohibit Americans from buying land within 100 miles of the coast.

    What you say is partly true.

    Buying Property in Mexico | How To Buy a House in Mexico

    https://www.globalpropertyguide.com/Latin-America/Mexico/Buying-Guide

    ….. In 1973, a constitutional amendment known as the Foreign Investment Law allowed foreigners to purchase real estate anywhere in Mexico except the restricted zone that consists of areas within 100 km (64 miles) of international borders or within 50 km (32 miles) from the coastline at high tide. In 1993, Mexico amended the constitution to allow foreigners to purchase real estate within the restricted zone by means of a fideicomiso.

    The fideicomiso is a bank trust wherein the bank (trustee) holds the trust deed for the purchaser (beneficiary). While the trustee is the legal owner of the real estate, the beneficiary retains all ownership rights and responsibilities and may sell, lease, mortgage, and pass the property on to heirs. The fideicomiso is authorized by the Mexican Government under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs…..
    _________________________________________________________________

    That system is actually better than the “leasehold” systems that the Brits run (you can only own/sell a lease on the property). Americans in places like NYC, Silicon Valley, …… might also be better off with a legal system that protects them from foreign property speculators.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. Monkeyboy says:

    Hey Fred, if Mexico is so great, why are so many people trying to leave?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    Because NAFTA destroyed Mexico's rural family farm economy like it destroyed ours. Prior to NAFTA there was no major immigration problems relating to Mexico.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. until 1910, Mexico was run by Europeans

    the Technológico of Monterrey, a premier engineering school

    Pic of graduating class …
    In his message to the graduating class, Tecnológico de Monterrey Rector David Noel Ramírez asks new alumni to transcend in their life purpose

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  30. @silviosilver

    Go into an ordinary bank, with which Mexico is littered. The clerks have to understand exchange rates, intermediate banks, SWIFT codes. They sit at computers, which are networked within the bank and with national headquarters, requiring network engineers and software weenies. Multitudinous ATMs require network people and maintainers. Telmex, the quite good telephone monopoly, needs people to program and maintain switches and associated software. So do TelCel and ATT, cell-phone providers. Airlines need pilots and trainers of pilots, people to run and maintain high-bypass turbofans and avionics, the instrument-landing systems (ILS). The internet needs software people, router techs, help-line techs when someone’s modem fails (the techs are good). Also doctors and dentists, universities to train them, people who understand and maintain MRI gear, the usual elaborate diagnostic instrumentation, mechanics to run the diagnostic computers at car dealerships and understand what lurks under the hoods of today’s cars (which would baffle Stephen Hawking). And so on at great length. Similar observations could be made of many Latin American and Asian countries. Starting from roughly zero a few decades ago.
     
    Someone needs to remind Fred that, as one American politico notoriously put it, "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best."

    Seriously, how does Fred imagine Mexico would react if America dumped the bottom ten percent of its population on Mexico, who not only crowded Mexicans out of their own cities, but insisted on speaking English instead of Spanish and celebrating the fourth of July instead of cinco de mayo?

    well done…very well done…….as i have been saying for over two decades now (and i live in SoCal, so I know a bit about these things first hand)……what we get are overwhelmingly NOT the best and brightest, or even the AVERAGE. We get Mexico’s West Virginia and Mississippi.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jim Christian

    We get Mexico’s West Virginia and Mississippi.
     
    No, we get Mexico's Detroit and Chicago gang bangers, their best Mexican breeders, their long line of multi-generation chains of welfare recipients, we get Mexico's low-IQ, petulant, hateful Latina women, none of whom are skinny and cute past the Bird-Flipper's in the picture's age of roughly 15. And in spite of the oft-propagated rumor, there are no "Wise Latina" women, there are only those bent against Whites, against the U.S., and against any notion of accountability once Latina-Grrrl is here. "Wise Latina" only knows how to cash in Latinia-Privilege Points for cash, prizes and Section 8 and all the goodies that come with it.

    Oh, and meet the latest in Perversion Importing: LatinX, a curious blend of whatever you want it to be because Liberals and the perverts from Mexico like to remain flexible. It's their wisdom.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Steve-O
    OK, Fred, we get it, Mexico isn't Haiti or the Congo. How many times are you going to beat down this anti-Mexican straw man?

    That being said, some food for thought:
    http://mexiconewsdaily.com/news/mexico-third-most-dangerous-country/

    http://takimag.com/article/gentrifiers_prefer_blondes_david_cole#axzz4ydKfjycB

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/06/opinion/the-country-that-stopped-reading.html

    That article by Cole is interesting but he fails to mention that the fusion of leftism and tribalism in the US owes much to Jewish influences. After all, most Jews were both on the ‘left’ and Zionist.

    And my beef is not with gentrification per se. Rather, it’s that white/Jews gentrifiers dump their problem on OTHER communities.
    They relocate blacks to other communities made up of peoples fleeing black crime and pathologies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve-o
    Oh, I know, I agree. Cole is a good writer, my favorite on Taki’s. But yes he is a Jew. It’s funny; he admitted in another article that importing Mexicans helps push out blacks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    It’s good to see Mexico making strides. We all want a nice and prosperous Mexico.

    But let’s face some facts. Mexicans feel lots of resentment about Anglos. This is actually common all across Latin America. White Latinos feel envious of Anglo achievement. It’s akin to Spanish and Italian envy of Northern Europeans who’ve done so much better.
    Among non-white ‘Latinos’, there is a racial resentment. This racial animus exists in Latin America too, but due to greater race-mixing, the white vs non-white line is more blurred there. But it’s more clearer in the US where whites have remained more white than in Latin America. So, the simmering racial tension in Latin America — where even whites pretend to be mixed — comes to the fore in America where the differences between white and non-white is far clearer.

    Also, all these Mexers in the US might not be so bad if not for PC and cuck-behavior among whites. In the past, Anglos were proud and earned the respect of Mexicans. Sure, Mexicans had bitter feelings about arrogant gringos and US takeover of SW, but they still admired gringos as a great people. But whites are now cucks in the US. They obey Jews and grovel before blacks. So, Mexicans now see gringo as puta.

    Also, it’s not just Mexicans who come across the border. It’s people from Central America. And now, even Muslims and Africans come to Mexico and try to cross the border.

    Also, even though Mexican population growth has stabilized, there are still poor underclass folks who have too many kids, and Mexico tries to push THESE people into the US.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Frankie P
    This is the point that Fred Reed deliberately neglects to address in every one of his "Mexico is great" columns. While he is busy praising the developments in Mexico, taking a few minutes here and there to paint all those who would enforce immigration laws as the "Loon Right", he misses the very point that Trump made during his campaign, that point that was simultaneously used by the corrupt media as evidence of his racist, intolerant views while it was embraced by American citizens, white, black and yes, hispanic, as the truth. "They aren't sending us their best." Now, if I had been in Bannon's shoes at the time, I would have hammered into Trump's head the idea that Mexico is not "sending" us anyone! The folks, tempted by economic realities (free stuff, DREAMER status for kids, jobs, potential amnesties), were just coming. So Trump's mistake was in how he voiced his opinions, which happen to be truths. Fred: Their best aren't coming. The software engineers, the dental assistants, the entrepreneurs, the medical professionals, the STEM professionals are NOT breaking the law and sneaking in. Fred: Those who ARE breaking the law and coming in are not skilled, not educated, and by the very act of entering the US illegality, not prone to respect the law. What they are willing to do is accept low-paying jobs that should be filled by low-skilled white and black US citizens at wages well below what the laws of supply and demand would set if they weren't here. Get this through your head!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. Man…the level of stereotyping here is absolutely incredible. Seriously…what’s the ‘Muricans problem with people who have a little melanin in their skin?

    Some here belabor the cartel violence in Mexico, using it as an argument that it makes it a 3rd world hell-hole. So, I ask: how much drug violence is there in ‘Murica? A little to much to be pointing the finger elsewhere, isn’t it? And getting rid of that violence in Mexico is pretty straight forward: either push for decriminalization here, quit buying drugs, or figure out some way to get Colombia to border the US, so the drugs don’t have to pass through Mexico. Bam! Problem solved.

    Some have complained, rather South Park-like, that ‘dey toook ar jaaawwbs!”. Do you realize this wouldn’t happen if “our” bottom 10 percent, “our” own low-skill/low-education crowd–the richest “poor” people on the face of this earth–would do the menial labor jobs (construction labor, agriculture, entry-level service work) that the majority of the so-called ‘illegals’ do, that economic opportunity would not exist and they would either stay there, or seek other opportunities? No, it’s not the fault of our overbearing welfare state, and a pervasive ‘murican belief that some jobs are just too laborious for good n’ righteous ‘muricans…it’s those damn illegals sneaking in here! Reminds me of something about stones and glass houses…but I forget why.

    Yeah, there’s corruption in Mexico. Some police, some military, *most* politicians…and that’s different from ‘Murica, how? At least most Mexicans understand and accept that their system is corrupt, as opposed to the rose-colored glasses crap that goes on here. (BTW…is ‘murica great again, yet?)

    Finally, remember all the places Mexico invaded and/or bombed the hell out of? Remember all governments they have overthrown and installed sympathetic puppet governments? Or how they use the peso to economically beat everyone else into submission? Yeah, I thought so…damn them for minding their own damn business.

    Read More
    • Troll: renfro
    • Replies: @Hank Rearden
    You ask: What’s the ‘Muricans problem with people who have a little melanin in their skin?

    Darker Skin = Higher Aggression + Lower IQ.

    "Studies find that darker pigmented people average higher levels of aggression and sexual activity (and also lower IQ)."

    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840
     
    And Diversity + Proximity = War

    Courtesy of reader chris, a large (and growing) reference list of studies finding strong and accumulating evidence for the Chateau Heartiste maxim that Diversity™ + Proximity = War by Various Means. Feel free to link to this post on social media platforms or drop it in a clown world combox whenever a shitlib smugly wanders into your shitlord kill zone, begging for a hail of hot Realtalk™.

    Diversity + Proximity = War
    heartiste.wordpress.com/diversity-proximity-war-the-reference-list/
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. republic says:

    I tip my hat to Fred the Mexican apologist his article would be a very good public relation press release for the Mexican state.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  35. TheJester says:
    @Rio Grande
    Mr Fred you explain your people how the cost of living in México is lower than USA, many Americans are here in Old Mexico for this very simple reason; how many Americans are living in Mexico just for this reason, thousands and many more are coming; Mr. Fred ask your people why nobody in America takes care for this senior people, ain´t they their brothers, they are not living in Mexico just for fun they miss their country and nobody miss them they just call those people in need.... traitors. but who is the real traitor?. those senior Americans are welcome in Mexico.

    Our Mexican friends (still illegal), tell us that the lower cost of living in Mexico is an illusion. It may be lower for dollar-based gringos … but Mexicans in the peso-based economy have a hard row of it. Our friends, an architect and university instructor in Mexico, lived in a small two-bedroom apartment in Mexico City and drove a broken-down VW beetle. She cleans houses and he waits tables in the United States … and they believe they have a much higher quality of life in the United States than in Mexico.

    The thing that really gets them about Mexico … is the pervasive violence. Fred mentions ATMs. Our friend says that in Mexico an armored car servicing ATMs is, in fact, two armored cars with ten guards carrying military-grade automatic weapons. He is amazed that in our community it is one armored car with two guys carrying pistols.

    She says that the violence in Mexico City is so pervasive that a mother cannot, in safety, take her baby to the local park for a stroll. On the contrary, we live in a “lake” community with finely manicured public areas, including networks of paths around the lakes. Having lived here for 19 years, we cannot recall one instance of anyone being assaulted, mugged, or worse on the lakes and paths.

    Our friends in a sense voted with their feet in the choice between their way of life in the United States and their way of life in Mexico.

    For a perspective on violence in Mexico, it might be useful if Fred referenced the State Department’s travel advisories on Mexico. Most of the country, including the popular resorts in Cancun, Cozumel, Playa del Carmen, Riviera Maya, and Tulum are on notice.

    https://travel.state.gov/content/passports/en/alertswarnings/mexico-travel-warning.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Our friends in a sense voted with their feet in the choice between their way of life in the United States and their way of life in Mexico.

    They ran instead of fixing the problems at home. No wonder nothing gets done.

    Also, do they show gratitude in the US? No, I'll bet they support illegals and want open access to the US as short cut to better life.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. She says that the violence in Mexico City is so pervasive that a mother cannot, in safety, take her baby to the local park for a stroll.

    That’s probably an overstatement. In general, people’s impressions of whether an area or an activity is safe or not are completely unreliable. The only way of speaking even approximately objectively about crime/safety is to cite statistics. And even then, one person’s assessment of “safety” can differ greatly from another’s. For one person, knowing that a single murder has taken place in their city is enough to make them paranoid; for someone else, New York may be perceived as crime-free – if they’ve previously lived in Detroit.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    " In general, people’s impressions of whether an area or an activity is safe or not are completely unreliable"
    Even if true, and I doubt it, it is "impressions" that dictate their behavior and thus quality of life.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @TheJester
    Our Mexican friends (still illegal), tell us that the lower cost of living in Mexico is an illusion. It may be lower for dollar-based gringos ... but Mexicans in the peso-based economy have a hard row of it. Our friends, an architect and university instructor in Mexico, lived in a small two-bedroom apartment in Mexico City and drove a broken-down VW beetle. She cleans houses and he waits tables in the United States ... and they believe they have a much higher quality of life in the United States than in Mexico.

    The thing that really gets them about Mexico ... is the pervasive violence. Fred mentions ATMs. Our friend says that in Mexico an armored car servicing ATMs is, in fact, two armored cars with ten guards carrying military-grade automatic weapons. He is amazed that in our community it is one armored car with two guys carrying pistols.

    She says that the violence in Mexico City is so pervasive that a mother cannot, in safety, take her baby to the local park for a stroll. On the contrary, we live in a "lake" community with finely manicured public areas, including networks of paths around the lakes. Having lived here for 19 years, we cannot recall one instance of anyone being assaulted, mugged, or worse on the lakes and paths.

    Our friends in a sense voted with their feet in the choice between their way of life in the United States and their way of life in Mexico.

    For a perspective on violence in Mexico, it might be useful if Fred referenced the State Department's travel advisories on Mexico. Most of the country, including the popular resorts in Cancun, Cozumel, Playa del Carmen, Riviera Maya, and Tulum are on notice.

    https://travel.state.gov/content/passports/en/alertswarnings/mexico-travel-warning.html

    Our friends in a sense voted with their feet in the choice between their way of life in the United States and their way of life in Mexico.

    They ran instead of fixing the problems at home. No wonder nothing gets done.

    Also, do they show gratitude in the US? No, I’ll bet they support illegals and want open access to the US as short cut to better life.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. @hyperbola
    There is a natural fit between "conservative" anglos and "conservative" latinos in that they share many social values. Your citation of family values is one example. The two groups would probably be best served by joining together to champion those values against the efforts of #3s to destroy them. Perhaps much of the anti-mexican rhetoric that exists in America is in reality sponsored by #3s as a divide and conquer mechanism?

    Anglos might do well to remember that many of their finest achievements have roots in the "latin" world of Europe. For example, the Republic of Venice had a parliament and president (doge) elected by universal suffrage over 300 years before the Brits got around to declaring "rights for aristocrats" (Magna Carta). There are reasons why the english language is so full of spanish-language words like: constitucion, libertad, legal, ......

    Anglos might do well to remember that many of their finest achievements have roots in the “latin” world of Europe. For example, the Republic of Venice had a parliament and president (doge) elected by universal suffrage over 300 years before the Brits got around to declaring “rights for aristocrats” (Magna Carta). There are reasons why the english language is so full of spanish-language words like: constitucion, libertad, legal, ……

    God Almighty the lengths shysters like you will go to to foist utterly useless immigrants on America. You are insufferable.

    Read More
    • Agree: syonredux
    • Replies: @hyperbola
    Actually I didn´t say anything about immigrants - rather that there are natural affinities between latino and anglo social conservatives. You weaken yourself by not taking advantage of those affinities - especially when it comes to resisting the abuses of those (#3s) who use divide and conquer to force immigration.

    How Neocons Destabilized Europe – Consortiumnews
    https://consortiumnews.com/2015/09/07/how-neocons-destabilized-europe/
    ..... When I first encountered the neocons in the 1980s, they had been given Central America to play with. President Ronald Reagan had credentialed many of them, bringing into the U.S. government neocon luminaries such as Elliott Abrams and Robert Kagan. But Reagan mostly kept them out of the big-power realms: the Mideast and Europe.

    Those strategic areas went to the “adults,” people like James Baker, George Shultz, Philip Habib and Brent Scowcroft. The poor Central Americans, as they tried to shed generations of repression and backwardness imposed by brutal right-wing oligarchies, faced U.S. neocon ideologues who unleashed death squads and even genocide against peasants, students and workers.

    The result not surprisingly was a flood of refugees, especially from El Salvador and Guatemala, northward to the United States. The neocon “success” in the 1980s, crushing progressive social movements and reinforcing the oligarchic controls, left most countries of Central America in the grip of corrupt regimes and crime syndicates, periodically driving more waves of what Reagan called “feet people” through Mexico to the southern U.S. border.....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. @Travis
    Mexico deports more hispanics each year than the United States....would be interested to see Fred discuss how Mexicans treat illegal aliens. It is in stark contrast to the treatment we give to Mexicans here in America, where they are welcomed, granted amnesty, given free health care, allowed to obtain drivers licenses, granted free education to their children, food stamps, affirmative action to give them preferences etc...

    When I lived in Mexico , for 3 months in 1994 , I was stopped by the police several times and forced to show my papers....again I lived in Mexico for 6 weeks in 1996 and was again stopped twice by the police asking for my documents. My traveling companions also were stopped at various points in time during our travels in Mexico. Why not do an article on how Mexico mistreats foreigners ? They still prohibit Americans from buying land within 100 miles of the coast.

    would be interested to see Fred discuss how Mexicans treat illegal aliens.

    I’m sure he would disapprove of the practice and warn Mexicans that their policy on illegals risks breaking up the Mexican state.

    Right, Fred?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. @Linda Green
    Just another observation: A large contingent of native white American people have embraced the cultural rot largely emanated en masse by the #3's and their associates and fellow ideological travelers, and it is many of the good Christian Mexicans who these days care for their aging parents, particularly the absentee native whites who have fled their hometowns for the metros but have not made it big enough to put their parents in nursing homes. We can preen and shit talk latins all day long, but they maintain much stronger family ties, and to some degree, particularly their women, continue to possess traits that a large contingent of our women sold out long ago. Furthermore, they did so with the blessing and encouragement of our most esteemed leadership. I hope we rid our nation of these nefarious actors, but I'm not holding my breath.

    There comes a point where financialization, media, hype, marketing, keeping up with the Jones's, etc will no longer cover for our people's glaring deficiencies in these areas. Looking at the latest debt numbers from the St Louis FED, it appears the deficient contingent is back up to their eyeballs in debt, so don't expect any big changes in their behavior.

    Sad commentary on our side of the fence.

    We can preen and shit talk latins all day long, but they maintain much stronger family ties, and to some degree, particularly their women, continue to possess traits that a large contingent of our women sold out long ago.

    Big effing deal. Muslims have even stronger family ties and even greater sexual modesty, but I somehow doubt you’re going to hold them up as model citizens.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. @Linda Green
    Rounding out the top three undesirables, all for quite different reasons:

    1. Negros - No Explanation Necessary
    2. Moslems - While perhaps fine people, their religion and customs are a poor fit for North America. They as a group are also notoriously thin skinned, any perceived insult to them regarding their race, religion, Koran, customs, etc. does not end well up to and including outright jihad or enlistment of quasi-powerful liberal types in defense of these qualities. Anyone who has worked around moslems, particularly at the lower end of the blue collar world is well aware of their fiery nature defending "their rights" or straight out shit talking the country they find themselves in.
    3. Jews - These are people who refuse to labor, have tribal over national or continental allegiance, have an outsized interest in careers in law, government and finance, and generally cannot function if they are not somehow figuring out a way to rule over, influence, propagandize or fleece someone not belonging to their tribe, otherwise known as the "mark" or "goy". When #2 on this list gets a burr under his saddle from a native, it is typically a #3 leading the charge in the legal system to chastise and punish them to whatever extent a judge, jury, politician or media outlet can be invited to do so. #3's are relentless in their pursuit of teaching marks that the only thing worse than crossing a #2 is crossing a #3. They have successfully achieved legal remedy in most countries other than the US for any language natives employ that agitates them. They have made sure that they have their own special offense that is based on public confession of distaste for them called anti-semitism that in today's politically correct climate can only be exceeded by public admission of distaste for #1's. Human liberty is not something this group is particularly in to, seeing as they prefer using all the various tools of the state to remedy their ills, and any opportunities to expand the size and scope of the government are music to their collective ears.

    Latin Americans, particularly the continental varieties are not bad when they come in a trickle. Interestingly enough the island varieties, while they look down their noses at the continental latins, have a predominante percentage of worthless whiny stock. Take the Puerto Rican's for instance, they largely fled from their homeland after the hurricane only to point the finger at the United States government as the problem actor.

    Latin Americans, particularly the continental varieties are not bad when they come in a trickle.

    The pessimist in me wants to say that you know the game is lost when even immigration skeptics fumble this badly, even if they’re just doing it in order to sound moderate.

    The reality is that unless you want to some day be completely overrun, you have to cut the immigration flow off completely. There is simply no other way.

    Whether the flow is a trickle or a flood hardly makes a difference in this respect (although the former is of course more bearable, or at least seems so). Drip by drip, your bathtub will eventually overflow, unless you turn off the tap.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Anatoly Karlin
    Deconstructing some myths that less informed American nativists might have about Mexico and middle-income countries generally = good.

    Tacking on the political opinion in the last two paragraphs in an overly blunt manner = detracts from that.

    And looks pretty weird, anyway. Why should a Mexican patriot such as yourself care about Mexicans' immigration prospects in the US?

    Better approach that would have spared you extra writing and readers' ire: Note that net Mexican - as in, Mexican citizen - immigration to the US has been negligible in the past decade. Can also convert that into another bit of evidence for increasing relative quality of life there.

    Wow, what a condescending tool you are.

    Who exactly are you to correct anyone? Your writings are barely distinguishable from some random 4chan poster. “Oh noes! Muh white race!”

    Do everyone a favor. If you have something to say, say it on your own blog. If you disagree, then disagree. Don’t be all smug and tell others what to write like you are a somebody. Because you are not.

    By the way, you too are an immigrant to my country. What makes (((you))) so much better than a Mexican? I would much rather have Lopez than Karlin anyday.

    Recap….

    Uncle Anatoly not telling others what to say = good.

    Uncle Anatoly menstruating in other people’s columns = detracts from that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    Your writings are barely distinguishable from some random 4chan poster.
     
    u mad brah?
    , @Wally
    Indeed, Karlin will mention easily debunked nonsense about 'Nazis', he will recite the required lies about the impossible 'holocaust' repeatedly in his posts, but don't dare respond to him or he'll censor you for responding to what he wrote.

    Karlin is the epitome of an insecure pretender.

    www.codoh.com

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. Steve-o says:
    @Anon
    That article by Cole is interesting but he fails to mention that the fusion of leftism and tribalism in the US owes much to Jewish influences. After all, most Jews were both on the 'left' and Zionist.

    And my beef is not with gentrification per se. Rather, it's that white/Jews gentrifiers dump their problem on OTHER communities.
    They relocate blacks to other communities made up of peoples fleeing black crime and pathologies.

    Oh, I know, I agree. Cole is a good writer, my favorite on Taki’s. But yes he is a Jew. It’s funny; he admitted in another article that importing Mexicans helps push out blacks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Desperate David Cole is utterly demolished here on some of his laughable Taki Magazine nonsense.

    'David Cole still trying his demolished 'holocaust-lite' routine'
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11466
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. @Anonymous
    Wow, what a condescending tool you are.

    Who exactly are you to correct anyone? Your writings are barely distinguishable from some random 4chan poster. "Oh noes! Muh white race!"

    Do everyone a favor. If you have something to say, say it on your own blog. If you disagree, then disagree. Don't be all smug and tell others what to write like you are a somebody. Because you are not.

    By the way, you too are an immigrant to my country. What makes (((you))) so much better than a Mexican? I would much rather have Lopez than Karlin anyday.

    Recap....

    Uncle Anatoly not telling others what to say = good.

    Uncle Anatoly menstruating in other people's columns = detracts from that.

    Your writings are barely distinguishable from some random 4chan poster.

    u mad brah?

    Read More
    • LOL: Daniel Chieh
    • Replies: @Truth
    LOL, hey nice ebonics, Poh-kovic
    , @Anonymous
    Sorry, didn't mean to trigger you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. My, my . . . with all these engineers and, by extension, scientists, technology developers, etc., etc., where are the contributions to humanity from Mexico? Where are the pharmaceuticals, the new technologies, the genetic exploration, the productivity developments, in short, where is the human progress? None, I think. Perfume an emerging country all you want, Fred, but it is still mired in primitiveness and uncouth behavior.

    Read More
    • Replies: @hyperbola
    ¿Cómo le va a la industria farmacéutica en México?
    https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/empresas/Como-le-va-a-la-industria-farmaceutica-en-Mexico-20170610-0010.html
    El mercado farmacéutico mexicano está entre los primeros 15 del mundo, y es el segundo de América Latina, genera impacto directo en 161 ramas de la actividad económica y las empresas farmacéuticas en México generan cerca de 74,000 empleos directos.....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. Truth says:
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Your writings are barely distinguishable from some random 4chan poster.
     
    u mad brah?

    LOL, hey nice ebonics, Poh-kovic

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. hyperbola says:
    @silviosilver

    Anglos might do well to remember that many of their finest achievements have roots in the “latin” world of Europe. For example, the Republic of Venice had a parliament and president (doge) elected by universal suffrage over 300 years before the Brits got around to declaring “rights for aristocrats” (Magna Carta). There are reasons why the english language is so full of spanish-language words like: constitucion, libertad, legal, ……
     
    God Almighty the lengths shysters like you will go to to foist utterly useless immigrants on America. You are insufferable.

    Actually I didn´t say anything about immigrants – rather that there are natural affinities between latino and anglo social conservatives. You weaken yourself by not taking advantage of those affinities – especially when it comes to resisting the abuses of those (#3s) who use divide and conquer to force immigration.

    How Neocons Destabilized Europe – Consortiumnews

    https://consortiumnews.com/2015/09/07/how-neocons-destabilized-europe/

    ….. When I first encountered the neocons in the 1980s, they had been given Central America to play with. President Ronald Reagan had credentialed many of them, bringing into the U.S. government neocon luminaries such as Elliott Abrams and Robert Kagan. But Reagan mostly kept them out of the big-power realms: the Mideast and Europe.

    Those strategic areas went to the “adults,” people like James Baker, George Shultz, Philip Habib and Brent Scowcroft. The poor Central Americans, as they tried to shed generations of repression and backwardness imposed by brutal right-wing oligarchies, faced U.S. neocon ideologues who unleashed death squads and even genocide against peasants, students and workers.

    The result not surprisingly was a flood of refugees, especially from El Salvador and Guatemala, northward to the United States. The neocon “success” in the 1980s, crushing progressive social movements and reinforcing the oligarchic controls, left most countries of Central America in the grip of corrupt regimes and crime syndicates, periodically driving more waves of what Reagan called “feet people” through Mexico to the southern U.S. border…..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. mainstream conservatives in the USA seem to bash Mexicans for the same reasons mainstream conservatives in UK bash Eastern Europeans: they adore Blacks and Muslims, do not dare to criticize them, so they look for a scapegoat.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    They adore Muslims in the UK?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. hyperbola says:
    @Frederick John
    My, my . . . with all these engineers and, by extension, scientists, technology developers, etc., etc., where are the contributions to humanity from Mexico? Where are the pharmaceuticals, the new technologies, the genetic exploration, the productivity developments, in short, where is the human progress? None, I think. Perfume an emerging country all you want, Fred, but it is still mired in primitiveness and uncouth behavior.

    ¿Cómo le va a la industria farmacéutica en México?

    https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/empresas/Como-le-va-a-la-industria-farmaceutica-en-Mexico-20170610-0010.html

    El mercado farmacéutico mexicano está entre los primeros 15 del mundo, y es el segundo de América Latina, genera impacto directo en 161 ramas de la actividad económica y las empresas farmacéuticas en México generan cerca de 74,000 empleos directos…..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. KenH says:

    I think Fred needs to change his name to Fredrico Reedriguez since he’s been channeling his inner Mexican of late. I know several Mexican who came here “leeegally” and “went through the process” and they are all Democrats who support illegal aliens getting citizenship. One used to vote Republican until Mittens Romney encouraged illegal aliens to self deport and truthfully stated that 47% of the nation won’t vote for him because they are receiving government assistance in various forms. That was just too much for this man’s Mexican sensibilities since most of his people are disproportionately receiving government assistance.

    Conservatives have this belief that if someone from a third world nations goes through the immigration process to achieve legal status that makes them a true blue American in mind and spirit. If that were true than 80% of them would be voting Republican instead of for the hate whitey Democrats.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  51. Truth says:
    @Erik Sieven
    mainstream conservatives in the USA seem to bash Mexicans for the same reasons mainstream conservatives in UK bash Eastern Europeans: they adore Blacks and Muslims, do not dare to criticize them, so they look for a scapegoat.

    They adore Muslims in the UK?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Erik Sieven
    well not really, you are right. they adore Blacks but still do not dare to criticize Muslims, too, for whatever reasons
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. Fred seems to think that the ability to ape their betters makes the dagi (must be the plural, no?) virtuous and special.

    Everything he mentioned was invented by western white men.

    “Hispanics” – the States word, and in the US primarily of Mexican origin or descent, are twice as likely as Whites to be on the dole.

    https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012026/tables/table_32.asp

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  53. KevinB says:

    Distribution of wealth is badly unequal, being now what the US is becoming.

    And you believe that this trend has nothing to do with the Latinization of the US?

    Of course, census data says otherwise, —but who needs data when you have established Narrative to explain the world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  54. @KenH

    Will furiously hostile anti-immigrant lobbies make them into internal enemies? They want to, and it would be the end of the US.
     
    It was only a matter of time before Freddy took a dump on white Americans who have the temerity to oppose their nation being turned into a Mexican colony. In most of his articles he always makes a point to unload a little excrement and guilt tripping on whites who don't accept his pollyanna views of Mestizos in Mexico and America.

    Generally, Mexican-Americans are not as hostile towards whites and insufferable as blacks are, but there are still problems and tension and that is largely the fault of Mexicans. For starters, the presence of illegal aliens, who are mostly the genetic wastrels of Mexico, has destroyed many smaller towns and cities and with it, the good will of the white citizens who used to think they were so hard working and friendly when they were but a small minority. Gangs and juvenile delinquency are a serious problem within the Mexican community and they've made areas of cities very dangerous for non-Mexicans (note: but their racial terror against blacks is poetic justice).

    They have many racial organizations that are highly antagonistic towards white Americans and there's no shortage of Mexican politicians who are race baiting firebrands. Exhibit A is La Raza and Tom Perez, head of the DNC.

    So sorry Fred, contrary to your wet dreams and propaganda, most Mexicans have not come to America with the best of intentions and to assimilate. Rather, they've come to recreate large and small little Mexico's inside the United States while reaping the largesse and government services that are the hallmarks of prosperous white nations.

    Fred has chosen his side and it wasn’t the Whites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. @silviosilver

    She says that the violence in Mexico City is so pervasive that a mother cannot, in safety, take her baby to the local park for a stroll.
     
    That's probably an overstatement. In general, people's impressions of whether an area or an activity is safe or not are completely unreliable. The only way of speaking even approximately objectively about crime/safety is to cite statistics. And even then, one person's assessment of "safety" can differ greatly from another's. For one person, knowing that a single murder has taken place in their city is enough to make them paranoid; for someone else, New York may be perceived as crime-free - if they've previously lived in Detroit.

    ” In general, people’s impressions of whether an area or an activity is safe or not are completely unreliable”
    Even if true, and I doubt it, it is “impressions” that dictate their behavior and thus quality of life.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Your writings are barely distinguishable from some random 4chan poster.
     
    u mad brah?

    Sorry, didn’t mean to trigger you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pincher Martin
    Seems like you triggered yourself.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. It will be really great when word gets around to the Mexicans about how jolly good their country is. Then maybe they will stop invading the USA by the millions.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  58. @Truth
    They adore Muslims in the UK?

    well not really, you are right. they adore Blacks but still do not dare to criticize Muslims, too, for whatever reasons

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Well Erik, and I say this as a friend, a purely constructive suggestion; when you figure out the reasons, then comment.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. Those who frame the discussion in IQ terms alone are missing the boat. Culture is probably equally if not more important. All this talk of STEM education being the cure to all our ills also misses the boat. If anything we could probably use more people interested in normal occupations than high-tech. High tech has pretty much already arrived, unless the ideal future in mind is just basically The Jestsons where every one just pushes buttons all day. And perhaps that is the future of the metros, filled with a bunch of politically correct navel gazing busybodies trying to save the world by signing petitions on their iPhones, engrossed with what laws are being written this week a la NPR, just knowing if they can all band together they will eventually conquer any remaining pockets of red blooded gun toting, liberty seeking Americans who actually understand and identify with the principles the country was founded on. Oh wait.

    If they were really so enlightened rather than brainwashed they would realize the extent to which they are herded and psychologically conquered not unlike cattle, and how every time they band together to take away freedoms from their fellow man, they decrease the time until the American project unravels.

    If they only understood the lengths the man behind the curtain had to go to keep the dream alive. There is a point to life beyond trying to edit DNA, figure out how to make sure humans never have to break a sweat via manual labor etc. IMO the rubicon has done been crossed. We are approaching “peak prosperity with liberty”. Next stop is living under a hidden technocracy. The tools for this are already in place, many Americans are knowingly placing microphones in their homes, which feed into the big data machines. These sort of arrangements have been tried in the past. The economists in charge are contemplating sending every one a check at the next downturn.

    It has never been more important than now to choose a career doing something one enjoys rather than looking at salary. When all the work is gone via automation as some claim is around the corner, we will have serious problems on the horizon.

    My advice mirrors that from George Orwell: Don’t let it happen to you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  60. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Bragadocious
    It's amusing how Fred Reed is unable to praise Mexico without taking numerous swipes at the United States. I've noticed the Brits and Irish do this as well. Maybe Fred is picking up their trolling style. Or maybe he's from Anglo-Irish stock.

    If you can't praise Mexico without running down others, then I say your credibility is shot. You have an agenda, plain and simple. You're the Baghdad Bob of Lake Chapala.

    Then there's this: "Will furiously hostile anti-immigrant lobbies make them into internal enemies? They want to, and it would be the end of the US."

    How so? The U.S. did great when it was 90% white, and in fact our standard of living was the highest in the world. Mechanized grape and cherry and lettuce pickers are turning Mexicans into obsolete farm equipment. To suggest they provide absolutely vital services that cannot be replicated by U.S. citizens is incredibly fatuous.

    You have an agenda, plain and simple. You’re the Baghdad Bob of Lake Chapala.

    Haha. Very true. Even the image he chose for the article is classic propaganda.

    The US whites are being forced to surrender their own country to the lower IQ strangers with vastly different sensibilities and loyalties. The same is happening in Europe but faster and with much worse invaders. This is neither accidental or hidden. The globalists are fairly open about their plan to see the white race disappear and the brown “guests” are happy to oblige.

    Fred is basically channelling Sadiq Khan:

    - “Most beaners are good people” – Yes, of course, but this is true for every country in the World – if one bothers to visit. Most people just want to live in peace and prosper. The problem arises when you move millions of them into another, smarter country, where they form a distinct, semi-permanent underclass. That average 88 IQ immigrant beaner is suddenly finding himself at the bottom of the socio-economic totem pole. In Mexico he was happy and “good” but in the US he’s unsatisfied and not so good natured (surprisingly enough, a person’s happiness is closely linked to their position in the surrounding human ecosystem). His 88 IQ son will be even worse since he’d be lacking his father’s sense of accomplishment when he moved to the US. He’s starting at the bottom of his ecosystem and the globalists are ready to teach him about the evils of white man.

    - “Mexico is not that bad” – Who cares. Just stay there and enjoy. The underlying assumption that the population is as capable as any other is obviously wrong but you don’t get the right to mass-migrate regardless. People are a territorial species for a reason.

    - “Don’t criticise the beaners or else” – This one is classic Khan and probably the dumbest argument on the list. Why the fuck would anyone import millions of people who are prone to become hostile when criticised? Are we on the same planet? This “reasoning” can only lead to further misery and polarisation. The goal is, of course, to pacify the host population and victim-blame them to extinction.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    That was a great comment - I don't press twitter/tweet buttons and shit but... AGREED!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. Truth says:
    @Erik Sieven
    well not really, you are right. they adore Blacks but still do not dare to criticize Muslims, too, for whatever reasons

    Well Erik, and I say this as a friend, a purely constructive suggestion; when you figure out the reasons, then comment.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. @Anonymous

    You have an agenda, plain and simple. You’re the Baghdad Bob of Lake Chapala.
     
    Haha. Very true. Even the image he chose for the article is classic propaganda.

    The US whites are being forced to surrender their own country to the lower IQ strangers with vastly different sensibilities and loyalties. The same is happening in Europe but faster and with much worse invaders. This is neither accidental or hidden. The globalists are fairly open about their plan to see the white race disappear and the brown "guests" are happy to oblige.

    Fred is basically channelling Sadiq Khan:

    - "Most beaners are good people" - Yes, of course, but this is true for every country in the World - if one bothers to visit. Most people just want to live in peace and prosper. The problem arises when you move millions of them into another, smarter country, where they form a distinct, semi-permanent underclass. That average 88 IQ immigrant beaner is suddenly finding himself at the bottom of the socio-economic totem pole. In Mexico he was happy and "good" but in the US he's unsatisfied and not so good natured (surprisingly enough, a person's happiness is closely linked to their position in the surrounding human ecosystem). His 88 IQ son will be even worse since he'd be lacking his father's sense of accomplishment when he moved to the US. He's starting at the bottom of his ecosystem and the globalists are ready to teach him about the evils of white man.

    - "Mexico is not that bad" - Who cares. Just stay there and enjoy. The underlying assumption that the population is as capable as any other is obviously wrong but you don't get the right to mass-migrate regardless. People are a territorial species for a reason.

    - "Don't criticise the beaners or else" - This one is classic Khan and probably the dumbest argument on the list. Why the fuck would anyone import millions of people who are prone to become hostile when criticised? Are we on the same planet? This "reasoning" can only lead to further misery and polarisation. The goal is, of course, to pacify the host population and victim-blame them to extinction.

    That was a great comment – I don’t press twitter/tweet buttons and shit but… AGREED!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. Marcus says:

    Lol I hope the Mexican gov. is dropping you a few pesos for these efforts. Mexico has an HDI of 77, in between Lebanon and Azerbaijan, this in spite of having great climate, plenty of coastline, bountiful resources, long border with the US, etc. Mexico is like you: mediocre at best.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  64. Joe Walker says: • Website

    If Mexico is so wonderful why do so many Mexicans want to move to the United States?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  65. Wally says: • Website
    @Anonymous
    Wow, what a condescending tool you are.

    Who exactly are you to correct anyone? Your writings are barely distinguishable from some random 4chan poster. "Oh noes! Muh white race!"

    Do everyone a favor. If you have something to say, say it on your own blog. If you disagree, then disagree. Don't be all smug and tell others what to write like you are a somebody. Because you are not.

    By the way, you too are an immigrant to my country. What makes (((you))) so much better than a Mexican? I would much rather have Lopez than Karlin anyday.

    Recap....

    Uncle Anatoly not telling others what to say = good.

    Uncle Anatoly menstruating in other people's columns = detracts from that.

    Indeed, Karlin will mention easily debunked nonsense about ‘Nazis’, he will recite the required lies about the impossible ‘holocaust’ repeatedly in his posts, but don’t dare respond to him or he’ll censor you for responding to what he wrote.

    Karlin is the epitome of an insecure pretender.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    Karlin is the epitome of an insecure pretender.
     
    Agreed. Karlin knows about Russia (or at least the rest of us don't know enough about Russia to prove otherwise)..

    ...But he is hopelessly out of his depth in just about any other subject.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Thomm says:
    @Bragadocious
    It's amusing how Fred Reed is unable to praise Mexico without taking numerous swipes at the United States. I've noticed the Brits and Irish do this as well. Maybe Fred is picking up their trolling style. Or maybe he's from Anglo-Irish stock.

    If you can't praise Mexico without running down others, then I say your credibility is shot. You have an agenda, plain and simple. You're the Baghdad Bob of Lake Chapala.

    Then there's this: "Will furiously hostile anti-immigrant lobbies make them into internal enemies? They want to, and it would be the end of the US."

    How so? The U.S. did great when it was 90% white, and in fact our standard of living was the highest in the world. Mechanized grape and cherry and lettuce pickers are turning Mexicans into obsolete farm equipment. To suggest they provide absolutely vital services that cannot be replicated by U.S. citizens is incredibly fatuous.

    How so? The U.S. did great when it was 90% white, and in fact our standard of living was the highest in the world.

    There was never a time like this. The time you are referring to (1925-1975) was also when Italians, Poles, and Jews were not considered white.

    Sure it was 85% white under TODAY’s definition of ‘white’, but not under the contemporary definition of ‘white’. This is what WN idiots never grasp.

    Under the 1870 definition of ‘white’, only 20% of Americans are white (even Irish were excluded from this definition). But in the future, Hispanics in Asians will be reclassified as ‘white’, and White Nationalists will go along with it, just like they did in the past.

    Texas, always ahead of the curve, declared that the Texas definition of white is that ‘anyone who is not black, is white’, which also ties to what Steve Sailer pointed out about African vs. non-African genetics.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Frankie P
    Fool, the immigrants that you refer to as "not white" happened to share the same cultural roots, similar religious beliefs (not the Jews, and I NEVER say "Judeo-Christian") and an ability and desire to assimilate and become part of the "American dream". If immigration had continued in this trajectory, the US would be much stronger today. Unfortunately, the trajectory was changed 180 degrees, and now only those with different cultural roots are welcome.
    , @Bragadocious
    Sure it was 85% white under TODAY’s definition of ‘white’, but not under the contemporary definition of ‘white’

    This doesn't even make sense. And neither do you. I think you need a nap.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Wally says: • Website
    @Steve-o
    Oh, I know, I agree. Cole is a good writer, my favorite on Taki’s. But yes he is a Jew. It’s funny; he admitted in another article that importing Mexicans helps push out blacks.

    Desperate David Cole is utterly demolished here on some of his laughable Taki Magazine nonsense.

    ‘David Cole still trying his demolished ‘holocaust-lite’ routine’

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11466

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve-o
    Tl;dr
    , @Vinteuil
    Wally, your constant, ineffectual shilling for that pathetic website is beyond ridiculous.

    Pretending that the Nazis didn't single out jews for special mistreatment just makes you look like a moron.

    I mean, what's your ultimate claim, here? That the Nazis didn't exterminate jews - they just enslaved them, in service of their campaign of extermination against the slavs?

    There are plenty of good reasons to question the disproportionate jewish influence on American politics. But you're not helping.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Frankie P says:
    @Anon
    It's good to see Mexico making strides. We all want a nice and prosperous Mexico.

    But let's face some facts. Mexicans feel lots of resentment about Anglos. This is actually common all across Latin America. White Latinos feel envious of Anglo achievement. It's akin to Spanish and Italian envy of Northern Europeans who've done so much better.
    Among non-white 'Latinos', there is a racial resentment. This racial animus exists in Latin America too, but due to greater race-mixing, the white vs non-white line is more blurred there. But it's more clearer in the US where whites have remained more white than in Latin America. So, the simmering racial tension in Latin America -- where even whites pretend to be mixed -- comes to the fore in America where the differences between white and non-white is far clearer.

    Also, all these Mexers in the US might not be so bad if not for PC and cuck-behavior among whites. In the past, Anglos were proud and earned the respect of Mexicans. Sure, Mexicans had bitter feelings about arrogant gringos and US takeover of SW, but they still admired gringos as a great people. But whites are now cucks in the US. They obey Jews and grovel before blacks. So, Mexicans now see gringo as puta.

    Also, it's not just Mexicans who come across the border. It's people from Central America. And now, even Muslims and Africans come to Mexico and try to cross the border.

    Also, even though Mexican population growth has stabilized, there are still poor underclass folks who have too many kids, and Mexico tries to push THESE people into the US.

    This is the point that Fred Reed deliberately neglects to address in every one of his “Mexico is great” columns. While he is busy praising the developments in Mexico, taking a few minutes here and there to paint all those who would enforce immigration laws as the “Loon Right”, he misses the very point that Trump made during his campaign, that point that was simultaneously used by the corrupt media as evidence of his racist, intolerant views while it was embraced by American citizens, white, black and yes, hispanic, as the truth. “They aren’t sending us their best.” Now, if I had been in Bannon’s shoes at the time, I would have hammered into Trump’s head the idea that Mexico is not “sending” us anyone! The folks, tempted by economic realities (free stuff, DREAMER status for kids, jobs, potential amnesties), were just coming. So Trump’s mistake was in how he voiced his opinions, which happen to be truths. Fred: Their best aren’t coming. The software engineers, the dental assistants, the entrepreneurs, the medical professionals, the STEM professionals are NOT breaking the law and sneaking in. Fred: Those who ARE breaking the law and coming in are not skilled, not educated, and by the very act of entering the US illegality, not prone to respect the law. What they are willing to do is accept low-paying jobs that should be filled by low-skilled white and black US citizens at wages well below what the laws of supply and demand would set if they weren’t here. Get this through your head!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Frankie P says:
    @Thomm

    How so? The U.S. did great when it was 90% white, and in fact our standard of living was the highest in the world.
     
    There was never a time like this. The time you are referring to (1925-1975) was also when Italians, Poles, and Jews were not considered white.

    Sure it was 85% white under TODAY's definition of 'white', but not under the contemporary definition of 'white'. This is what WN idiots never grasp.

    Under the 1870 definition of 'white', only 20% of Americans are white (even Irish were excluded from this definition). But in the future, Hispanics in Asians will be reclassified as 'white', and White Nationalists will go along with it, just like they did in the past.

    Texas, always ahead of the curve, declared that the Texas definition of white is that 'anyone who is not black, is white', which also ties to what Steve Sailer pointed out about African vs. non-African genetics.

    Fool, the immigrants that you refer to as “not white” happened to share the same cultural roots, similar religious beliefs (not the Jews, and I NEVER say “Judeo-Christian”) and an ability and desire to assimilate and become part of the “American dream”. If immigration had continued in this trajectory, the US would be much stronger today. Unfortunately, the trajectory was changed 180 degrees, and now only those with different cultural roots are welcome.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    Fool, the immigrants that you refer to as “not white” happened to share the same cultural roots, similar religious beliefs (not the Jews, and I NEVER say “Judeo-Christian”) and an ability and desire to assimilate and become part of the “American dream”.
     
    No, faggot. The Irish were emphatically considered non-white, and later the Italians were also considered non-white. And not just because Irish and Italians were Catholic.

    Get a clue. Read about 'No Irish Need Apply' signs.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. You’re wasting everybody’s time, Fred. How many times can you possibly recycle the same spiel? The Sierra Club ought to give you a green efficiency award.

    Read More
    • Agree: Vinteuil
    • Replies: @Vinteuil
    To my knowledge, Fred Reed has never read or replied to anything ever published on this website. He never, ever quotes Derbyshire, Coulter, Sailer, or anybody else before trashing them. He's no good.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. Thomm says:
    @Wally
    Indeed, Karlin will mention easily debunked nonsense about 'Nazis', he will recite the required lies about the impossible 'holocaust' repeatedly in his posts, but don't dare respond to him or he'll censor you for responding to what he wrote.

    Karlin is the epitome of an insecure pretender.

    www.codoh.com

    Karlin is the epitome of an insecure pretender.

    Agreed. Karlin knows about Russia (or at least the rest of us don’t know enough about Russia to prove otherwise)..

    …But he is hopelessly out of his depth in just about any other subject.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. Steve-o says:
    @Wally
    Desperate David Cole is utterly demolished here on some of his laughable Taki Magazine nonsense.

    'David Cole still trying his demolished 'holocaust-lite' routine'
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11466

    Tl;dr

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. @Brabantian
    With a positive experience of Mexicans myself, I share some of Fred's thinking, and see favourable Mexican-Anglo relations as a good thing for North America's future ... but my guess is that for some readers here, their impression of the Spanish-speaking presence in the USA is a little more along the lines of this photo of an expressive pretty Latina
    https://dezinfo.net/images3/image/09.2010/neleg/1040.jpg

    Hateful, depraved, overly privileged Latina. Pretty? Pretty enough to grudge-fuck.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    Are you "grudge-fucking" your Brazilian concubine? Or has she found greener pastures....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @fred c dobbs
    well done...very well done.......as i have been saying for over two decades now (and i live in SoCal, so I know a bit about these things first hand)......what we get are overwhelmingly NOT the best and brightest, or even the AVERAGE. We get Mexico's West Virginia and Mississippi.

    We get Mexico’s West Virginia and Mississippi.

    No, we get Mexico’s Detroit and Chicago gang bangers, their best Mexican breeders, their long line of multi-generation chains of welfare recipients, we get Mexico’s low-IQ, petulant, hateful Latina women, none of whom are skinny and cute past the Bird-Flipper’s in the picture’s age of roughly 15. And in spite of the oft-propagated rumor, there are no “Wise Latina” women, there are only those bent against Whites, against the U.S., and against any notion of accountability once Latina-Grrrl is here. “Wise Latina” only knows how to cash in Latinia-Privilege Points for cash, prizes and Section 8 and all the goodies that come with it.

    Oh, and meet the latest in Perversion Importing: LatinX, a curious blend of whatever you want it to be because Liberals and the perverts from Mexico like to remain flexible. It’s their wisdom.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Logan says:
    @hyperbola
    There is a natural fit between "conservative" anglos and "conservative" latinos in that they share many social values. Your citation of family values is one example. The two groups would probably be best served by joining together to champion those values against the efforts of #3s to destroy them. Perhaps much of the anti-mexican rhetoric that exists in America is in reality sponsored by #3s as a divide and conquer mechanism?

    Anglos might do well to remember that many of their finest achievements have roots in the "latin" world of Europe. For example, the Republic of Venice had a parliament and president (doge) elected by universal suffrage over 300 years before the Brits got around to declaring "rights for aristocrats" (Magna Carta). There are reasons why the english language is so full of spanish-language words like: constitucion, libertad, legal, ......

    For example, the Republic of Venice had a parliament and president (doge) elected by universal suffrage over 300 years before the Brits got around to declaring “rights for aristocrats” (Magna Carta).

    Not hardly! The doge was always elected by the aristos, but at first there was a pretense of seeking the acquiescence of the people, as with the pope. This was dropped completely in 1423.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doge_of_Venice

    The Great Council was also clearly and explicitly an aristocratic and hereditary body, not an elected parliament.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Council_of_Venice

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. “Will furiously hostile anti-immigrant lobbies make them into internal enemies? They want to, and it would be the end of the US.”

    Where to begin with this? Who is insane enough to want “internal enemies”? These “lobbies” that Fred smears with “furiously hostile anti-immigrant” (he forgot “racist”) think for pretty good reasons that the three-decade influx of Mexicans into California has not made California a better place. It has, however, made it a one-party (Democrat) ruled state, and, inevitably, rampant corruption — sort of like the Mexican PRI which the Democrats increasingly resemble. There are interests groups converting immigrants into “internal enemies”. They are called universities, insane asylums run by the inmates.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  77. i more or less agree with fred here…i am definitely anti-immigration, and want to build the wall, and I want to stop mexico from meddling in american policy…but mexico is not a hellhole, and their more laid-back approach is better than ours…and their government is not as intrusive and controlling as ours…they can build homes more easily…while we go into massive debt for homes…a middle class person in mexico has a better life than a middle class person here…also, their climate is better than ours, in general.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  78. Nearly every word you utter is all the more reason to enforce our immigration laws in full.

    But let’ get something straight I on the right don’t care whether Mexicans are the rascals or he salt of the earth. That is immaterial to the issue.

    The issue which was and remains salient is that the illegal immigration and the subsequent illegal immigrants who reside here are part an underground that undermines the US economy and undermines US citizens employment and other features that are entitled to as citizens. They must go.

    The US citizen has every right to demand that her sovereignty be respected and honored.

    Adult males, females should take their children with them, as i expected as parents, because they are not citizens merely because they are born here. And that includes that tricky band of DACA recipients, another gambit by the establishment to create more liberal democrats and o cheap labor.

    And every single one of them residing in the US illegally, should head back to their non-third world country.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  79. Here’s something that the author seems void of acknowledging for fear that it might upset his agenda.

    Nearly every single mexican believes that the US stole the southwest from Mexico. And that their occupation is should be tolerated if not celebrated as reclaiming stolen property. A mexican Pres who is aiding and abetting the violation of US soil is in fact, supporting a violation of international and engaged in a form of warfare.

    This is a low level level war — and anyone who doesn’t yet grasp that is as much an enemy of the state as La Raza.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  80. Jeff77450 says:

    Fred, good article, thank you. You haven’t convinced me that Mexico is just “misunderstood.” I’ve tried to imagine ~43 college students in the U.S. being kidnapped & murdered by *any* police department and I just can’t do it. I wouldn’t set foot in Mexico “if you paid me.”

    You’re probably familiar with Victor D. Hanson and his book Mexifornia. I don’t know if you’ve written about it or about what’s happening in SoCal but I’d be very interested to hear your perspective.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  81. @Daniel Chieh
    Why is organized crime such a feature, then? In many ways, it doesn't sound like even a state that has control over areas of itself.

    too much money in drugs. look at what we are willing to do for oil? the drug trade is like a smaller version of it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. @Anonymous
    Sorry, didn't mean to trigger you.

    Seems like you triggered yourself.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. aandrews says:
    @TheBoom
    Fred views Mexico through Gringo glasses . All but one Mexican I met when living there - rich to working class - would rather live in the US. The cab drivers would almost all repeat verbatim "in the US if you work hard, you get ahead. Not Mexico!" There is a very widespread frustration with a culture of corruption and "mediocrity" and a strong belief that everything is stacked against the average person.

    Take away remittances from Mexicans living in the US (which are a major segment of the economy) and all the (formerly US) jobs that have been created through NAFTA and Mexico would be in trouble. They are being propped up at the expense of the American worker. Without the sacrifice of the US working class, Mexico would have to be build a real economy.

    “Take away remittances from Mexicans living in the US…and all the…jobs that have been created through NAFTA and Mexico would be in trouble.”

    Yeah, Fred. Why don’t you take Mexico and shove it up your ass.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Daniel Chieh
    Why is organized crime such a feature, then? In many ways, it doesn't sound like even a state that has control over areas of itself.

    Because the state itself is involved in the organized crime, that’s why.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. @Future Ex-Pat
    Man...the level of stereotyping here is absolutely incredible. Seriously...what's the 'Muricans problem with people who have a little melanin in their skin?

    Some here belabor the cartel violence in Mexico, using it as an argument that it makes it a 3rd world hell-hole. So, I ask: how much drug violence is there in 'Murica? A little to much to be pointing the finger elsewhere, isn't it? And getting rid of that violence in Mexico is pretty straight forward: either push for decriminalization here, quit buying drugs, or figure out some way to get Colombia to border the US, so the drugs don't have to pass through Mexico. Bam! Problem solved.

    Some have complained, rather South Park-like, that 'dey toook ar jaaawwbs!". Do you realize this wouldn't happen if "our" bottom 10 percent, "our" own low-skill/low-education crowd--the richest "poor" people on the face of this earth--would do the menial labor jobs (construction labor, agriculture, entry-level service work) that the majority of the so-called 'illegals' do, that economic opportunity would not exist and they would either stay there, or seek other opportunities? No, it's not the fault of our overbearing welfare state, and a pervasive 'murican belief that some jobs are just too laborious for good n' righteous 'muricans...it's those damn illegals sneaking in here! Reminds me of something about stones and glass houses...but I forget why.

    Yeah, there's corruption in Mexico. Some police, some military, *most* politicians...and that's different from 'Murica, how? At least most Mexicans understand and accept that their system is corrupt, as opposed to the rose-colored glasses crap that goes on here. (BTW...is 'murica great again, yet?)

    Finally, remember all the places Mexico invaded and/or bombed the hell out of? Remember all governments they have overthrown and installed sympathetic puppet governments? Or how they use the peso to economically beat everyone else into submission? Yeah, I thought so...damn them for minding their own damn business.

    You ask: What’s the ‘Muricans problem with people who have a little melanin in their skin?

    Darker Skin = Higher Aggression + Lower IQ.

    “Studies find that darker pigmented people average higher levels of aggression and sexual activity (and also lower IQ).”

    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840

    And Diversity + Proximity = War

    Courtesy of reader chris, a large (and growing) reference list of studies finding strong and accumulating evidence for the Chateau Heartiste maxim that Diversity™ + Proximity = War by Various Means. Feel free to link to this post on social media platforms or drop it in a clown world combox whenever a shitlib smugly wanders into your shitlord kill zone, begging for a hail of hot Realtalk™.

    Diversity + Proximity = War
    heartiste.wordpress.com/diversity-proximity-war-the-reference-list/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    And Diversity + Proximity = War
     
    False. The 'other' always gets reclassified as 'white' over time, with the exception of blacks. WNs go along with it (which is why you now consider Italians, Poles, and Jews as white, whereas you did not before).

    Ron Unz has done yeoman work in proving statistically that 2nd-gen Mexican-Americans don't have a higher crime rate than whites.

    Plus, Heartiste is a pickup artist. He has singlehandedly taught thousands of colored men how to bed white women. What do you think about that?

    , @Future Ex-Pat
    I read the cited 'study'...and it invalidates itself right in the conclusion: "The correlations between human pigmentation, aggression, and sexuality (and IQ), is further supported by the anthropological and sociological research..." Correlation is not causation. I think it would strike most anyone as absurd to exclude sociological and economic influences as they relate to incarceration rates for violent crime, than the significance of genetic composition.

    Crime statistics show that black on black crime is much more likely than black on anyone else. It's not a governmental study by a 'leading' researcher, but reading the Chicago Tribune or Baltimore Sun for a month would validate this assessment. So, do blacks in Chicago violently aggress against one another because they have more melanin, or due to other factors: limited economic opportunity? poor living conditions? a cultural/tribal need to acquire 'street cred', to move up the cultural hierarchy by out-violencing the violent? a cultural idealization (via music, TV and movies) of 'thug life' as being glamorous and desirable? failure of our educational system? simply boredom? Equal parts of all of these? Half of these reasons, plus 20 others? Honestly, I don't know, but genetics would seem to pale (no pun intended) in comparison. It strikes me as the $64,000 question, and one that society has been incapable of answering correctly, and I have serious doubts that it ever will.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. “Today, seventy-six years later (says the CIA Factbook), literacy is at 95%;”

    I used to rely somewhat on the CIA “Factbook” for a lot of things. Now, not so much, as extensive experience with the local Mexican diaspora and readings of multiple news exposes (English and Spanish language) on (imprisoned) Esther Gordillo and the Mexican National Public Schools Teachers Union simply trash the CIA’s “fact”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  87. Mr. Hack says:

    Everywhere I have been–LA, San Fran, DC, Huston, San Antonio, Pilsen and Berwyn in Chicago–they have seemed to be settling peacefully in. They have the potential to make it.

    I’ve lived in a north Phoenix neighborhood now for almost 20 years. Initially, this inner city neighborhood had a white majority, but over time the ‘browning’ (although a lot of Mexicans can actually pass for white) is quite noticeable. My neighbors are hard working individuals, busy working and raising their smallish families, too busy to be intrusive with my own personal affairs. They all keep up their yards and houses, and the local real estate market shows steady growth. They certainly are an attractive ‘race’ of people, making the trip to the local Mexican inspired supermarket a pleasant trip, giving me a chance to admire their beautiful children. I couldn’t ask for a better neighborhood, nor for better neighbors. No sign of gangs and no higher crime rate than in other parts of Phoenix make life here quite manageable.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    giving me a chance to admire their beautiful children
     
    Just keep it in your pants, Shlomo.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Fred should start proselytizing La Raza with his Freaqualist Gospel.

    “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.”

    Jose Angel Gutierrez
    Professor, University of Texas, Arlington
    Founder of La Raza Unida
    americanpatrol.com/REFERENCE/JoseAngelGutierrezQuote.html

    You’re a goddam traitor to your own nation, Fred. I wouldnn’t waste my piss on you if you were on fire.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  89. renfro says:

    I don’t dislike Mexicans, those I have encountered in my southeastern area are pretty hard working and law abiding. I have also traveled Mexico and found them friendly and hospitable for the most part.

    But when I encountered this kind of shit….:

    ”Will furiously hostile anti-immigrant lobbies make them into internal enemies? They want to, and it would be the end of the US.’

    That carries a threat and drips with envy and jealousy of we white European Americans…..and when I see hordes of illegals in the streets demanding rights they aren’t entitled to ….then I want to take the Fredies out to the woodshed and give them something to really hate about Americans.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  90. Kid Droid says:

    Yup, nothing has ever been invented by Mexicans, not even that whole American Cowboy thing either:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mexican_inventions_and_discoveries

    Read More
    • Replies: @JSM
    I always laugh when you POC-apologists give these lists of inventions.

    Talk about damning with faint praise!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    Whatever Mexico is or isn’t, the fact is overwhelming number of Mexicans feel resentment toward gringo.

    Also, no matter how much the GOP flatters Mexicans, they will still vote for Democrats and help push an agenda that is more anti-rule-of-law, more decadent, and more globalist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  92. mobi says:
    @Truth
    http://img.picturequotes.com/1/119/insanity-is-doing-the-same-thing-over-and-over-again-and-expecting-different-results-quote-1.jpg

    Like applying for a job, say?

    Or trying to pick up a beautiful girl?

    Or conducting yet another experiment to try to discover useful new insights into the nature of the physical world (when your last one hundred experiments failed, as they do)?

    Or, ….

    A remarkably moronic definition of insanity, it is.

    But it must be true, because everyone keeps saying so, and attaching the name Einstein to it!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. MattinTX says:

    What always amazes me is how many Mexican (and Latin American) immigrants are functionally illiterate in Spanish. There are probably millions of adult native Spanish-speaking foreign nationals in the U.S., who finished the equivalent of high school education in their home country, who don’t know the correct way to spell “voy” (Spanish word for I go) or “vengo” (I come). I have no idea how we expect them to learn to read and write English.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  94. mobi says:

    Fred, you’re protesting far too much.

    Why care so much about Americans’ opinions of Mexico and Mexicans?

    If all you say is true about how wonderful it is (and I doubt anyone here doubts any of it, as far as it goes, though of course you keep leaving out the most important stuff), why should Mexicans care whether we want them pouring across the border or not?

    Why don’t they just concentrate on building a wall to deny us all their Mexican wonderfulness? And leave us ‘right wing loons’ to suffer their absence? Don’t we deserve it?

    Shouldn’t you be preaching all this to them? Do you ever do that? Would your wife allow it?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  95. Thomm says:
    @Hank Rearden
    You ask: What’s the ‘Muricans problem with people who have a little melanin in their skin?

    Darker Skin = Higher Aggression + Lower IQ.

    "Studies find that darker pigmented people average higher levels of aggression and sexual activity (and also lower IQ)."

    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840
     
    And Diversity + Proximity = War

    Courtesy of reader chris, a large (and growing) reference list of studies finding strong and accumulating evidence for the Chateau Heartiste maxim that Diversity™ + Proximity = War by Various Means. Feel free to link to this post on social media platforms or drop it in a clown world combox whenever a shitlib smugly wanders into your shitlord kill zone, begging for a hail of hot Realtalk™.

    Diversity + Proximity = War
    heartiste.wordpress.com/diversity-proximity-war-the-reference-list/
     

    And Diversity + Proximity = War

    False. The ‘other’ always gets reclassified as ‘white’ over time, with the exception of blacks. WNs go along with it (which is why you now consider Italians, Poles, and Jews as white, whereas you did not before).

    Ron Unz has done yeoman work in proving statistically that 2nd-gen Mexican-Americans don’t have a higher crime rate than whites.

    Plus, Heartiste is a pickup artist. He has singlehandedly taught thousands of colored men how to bed white women. What do you think about that?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    He has singlehandedly taught thousands of colored men how to bed white women.
     
    Thousands?

    Damn, that's a good business he has.
    , @Hank Rearden
    Nice try at moving the goal post. I didn't mention crime. The studies listed at the Chateau don't refer to crime. Here's a sampling:

    Social trust is negatively affected by ethnic diversity, case study in Denmark from 1979 to the present. Link.
    – Ethnic homogeneity and Protestant traditions positively impact individual and societal levels of social trust. Link.
    – “In longitudinal perspective, [across European regions], an increase in immigration is related to a decrease in social trust.” Link.
     
    No cigar for you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. Truth says:

    Well now, if your first attempt at applying for a job, or trying to pick up a beautiful girl involved pulling your dick out, and it was unsuccessful…

    Read More
    • Replies: @mobi

    Well now, if your first attempt at applying for a job, or trying to pick up a beautiful girl involved pulling your dick out, and it was unsuccessful…
     
    If the quote you provided were 'The definition of insanity is pulling your dick out in a job interview'

    then you would have a point...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Mr. Hack

    Everywhere I have been–LA, San Fran, DC, Huston, San Antonio, Pilsen and Berwyn in Chicago–they have seemed to be settling peacefully in. They have the potential to make it.
     
    I've lived in a north Phoenix neighborhood now for almost 20 years. Initially, this inner city neighborhood had a white majority, but over time the 'browning' (although a lot of Mexicans can actually pass for white) is quite noticeable. My neighbors are hard working individuals, busy working and raising their smallish families, too busy to be intrusive with my own personal affairs. They all keep up their yards and houses, and the local real estate market shows steady growth. They certainly are an attractive 'race' of people, making the trip to the local Mexican inspired supermarket a pleasant trip, giving me a chance to admire their beautiful children. I couldn't ask for a better neighborhood, nor for better neighbors. No sign of gangs and no higher crime rate than in other parts of Phoenix make life here quite manageable.

    giving me a chance to admire their beautiful children

    Just keep it in your pants, Shlomo.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    You're sick buddy, only a closet pedophile could come up with one like this! :-(
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. renfro says:
    @hyperbola
    There is a natural fit between "conservative" anglos and "conservative" latinos in that they share many social values. Your citation of family values is one example. The two groups would probably be best served by joining together to champion those values against the efforts of #3s to destroy them. Perhaps much of the anti-mexican rhetoric that exists in America is in reality sponsored by #3s as a divide and conquer mechanism?

    Anglos might do well to remember that many of their finest achievements have roots in the "latin" world of Europe. For example, the Republic of Venice had a parliament and president (doge) elected by universal suffrage over 300 years before the Brits got around to declaring "rights for aristocrats" (Magna Carta). There are reasons why the english language is so full of spanish-language words like: constitucion, libertad, legal, ......

    ” There are reasons why the english language is so full of spanish-language words like: constitucion, libertad, legal, ……”>>>

    OMG……. it never ends….if its not the Jews claiming something descended from them , its the blacks claiming they built America and the Latinos doing the same.

    Those words are not “English language words’ ….and all the various words for ‘liberty’ came from the Greek Latin libertat-, libertas…..Not Latin America for gawds sake.
    In English its ‘liberty’, in French its Liberté,

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. renfro says:
    @TheBoom
    Fred views Mexico through Gringo glasses . All but one Mexican I met when living there - rich to working class - would rather live in the US. The cab drivers would almost all repeat verbatim "in the US if you work hard, you get ahead. Not Mexico!" There is a very widespread frustration with a culture of corruption and "mediocrity" and a strong belief that everything is stacked against the average person.

    Take away remittances from Mexicans living in the US (which are a major segment of the economy) and all the (formerly US) jobs that have been created through NAFTA and Mexico would be in trouble. They are being propped up at the expense of the American worker. Without the sacrifice of the US working class, Mexico would have to be build a real economy.

    ‘ Mexico’s central bank reported Mexicans overseas sent nearly $24.8 billion home in 2015, overtaking oil revenues for the first time as a source of foreign income.

    Remittances were up 4.75 percent from 2014 when they totaled $23.6 billion, the Bank of Mexico said.’

    Most remittances are used for immediate consumption — food, housing, health care, education — but some collective remittances, sent from Mexican migrants in the U.S. to their community of origin, are used for shared projects and infrastructure improvements under Mexico’s “3 for 1” program that matches contributions with federal, state, and local funds.”

    That is close to 10% of Mexico revenues to best of memory…..someone can look it up and tell me if thats wrong.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Fred talks about Mexican dentists and engineers but fails to look at the situation in Mexico for the average working class person. What is the minimum wage in Mexico? What is the work place accident rate? What is the crime rate like in working class suburbs? What is the public health care system like? What is the rural infrastructure like? If you’re working class in Latin America, I’ll beat life is a lot harsher than it is for a working class person in first world countries.

    Sure Mexico is not a third world country, it does have some infrastructure and an upper middle class that is doing okay, but he’s only looking at this from the perspective of an upper middle class American guy who is living around middle class Mexicans.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  101. Mr. Hack says:
    @Anonymous

    giving me a chance to admire their beautiful children
     
    Just keep it in your pants, Shlomo.

    You’re sick buddy, only a closet pedophile could come up with one like this! :-(

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. Vinteuil says:
    @Wally
    Desperate David Cole is utterly demolished here on some of his laughable Taki Magazine nonsense.

    'David Cole still trying his demolished 'holocaust-lite' routine'
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11466

    Wally, your constant, ineffectual shilling for that pathetic website is beyond ridiculous.

    Pretending that the Nazis didn’t single out jews for special mistreatment just makes you look like a moron.

    I mean, what’s your ultimate claim, here? That the Nazis didn’t exterminate jews – they just enslaved them, in service of their campaign of extermination against the slavs?

    There are plenty of good reasons to question the disproportionate jewish influence on American politics. But you’re not helping.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Pay attention, clueless, false argument / strawman user.
    No one says they didn't want Jews out of Germany & much of Europe, no one.

    And like the US put Japanese-Americans in concentration camps, the Germans put Jews in labor and relocation camps. Simple as that.

    So no, the Germans did not exterminate Jews. And you have no proof they did.

    We're talking about an alleged '6M Jews & 5M others' ... 11,000,000.
    There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claim of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, 34,000 at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.

    If there was the alleged ‘plan to kill every Jew the Germans could get their hands on’ then why are there endless numbers of so called “survivor$"?

    Jews were no more 'enslaved' than Japanese-Americans or those in the Soviet gulags, Allied camps, etc.
    If you would get off your stupidity stool for a moment and look for the facts and not just accept Zionist propaganda you would learn something for a change.

    Say what you will, but dominance by disgusting Zionists will never end until the truth about their fake '6M Jews' is openly, publicly stated. They use that scam for bloody everything and you know it.
    That's why it was fabricated in the 1st place. see below*

    Why have supremacist Jews have been marketing the '6,000,000' lie since at least 1869?
    http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php
    http://balder.org/judea/billeder-judea/Scan-New-York-Times-Six-Million-Since-1869-Composite.jpg

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. As Huxley never before had been in Mexico, how could he have seen development ?
    He did see sewing machines in many Mexican housholds, and a sombrero, and a shotgun, I’m not sure of the last item.
    But indeed, he did not describe country comparable to GB.
    On the other hand, he went to Mexico on a cruise ship, with rich western holiday makers.
    With great sarcasm he describes them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  104. Vinteuil says:
    @Intelligent Dasein
    You're wasting everybody's time, Fred. How many times can you possibly recycle the same spiel? The Sierra Club ought to give you a green efficiency award.

    To my knowledge, Fred Reed has never read or replied to anything ever published on this website. He never, ever quotes Derbyshire, Coulter, Sailer, or anybody else before trashing them. He’s no good.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. RobinG says:
    @Jim Christian
    Hateful, depraved, overly privileged Latina. Pretty? Pretty enough to grudge-fuck.

    Are you “grudge-fucking” your Brazilian concubine? Or has she found greener pastures….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. Truth says:
    @Thomm

    And Diversity + Proximity = War
     
    False. The 'other' always gets reclassified as 'white' over time, with the exception of blacks. WNs go along with it (which is why you now consider Italians, Poles, and Jews as white, whereas you did not before).

    Ron Unz has done yeoman work in proving statistically that 2nd-gen Mexican-Americans don't have a higher crime rate than whites.

    Plus, Heartiste is a pickup artist. He has singlehandedly taught thousands of colored men how to bed white women. What do you think about that?

    He has singlehandedly taught thousands of colored men how to bed white women.

    Thousands?

    Damn, that’s a good business he has.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm
    Well, his blog, but yes.

    He has been blogging for 10 years, and has done over 4000 articles, most about how to be a PUA. Some older articles specifically instruct colored guys how to rapidly seduce white women.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. RobinG says:

    Fred, you’re certainly an angry whack-job magnet…(maybe because you called them the loon right, lol.) Even back in 1973, my dentist in Tuxtla Gutierrez was eminently competent. Now, even though I live on the other side of the continent, it may be worth my while to visit Molar City.

    Welcome to Molar City

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  108. Thomm says:
    @Truth

    He has singlehandedly taught thousands of colored men how to bed white women.
     
    Thousands?

    Damn, that's a good business he has.

    Well, his blog, but yes.

    He has been blogging for 10 years, and has done over 4000 articles, most about how to be a PUA. Some older articles specifically instruct colored guys how to rapidly seduce white women.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. Rurik says:

    and it would be the end of the US.

    Fred reminds me of this charming lady

    ” Europe [The ZUSA] has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we [Fred and Barbara] are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe [ZUS] is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews [& Fred] are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe [N. America] to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews [& Fred] will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe [the US] will not survive.”

    two peas in a pod

    https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/fred-reed-accept-no-substitutes.jpg?w=500&h=407

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  110. renfro says:

    FBI report on black ‘extremists’ raises fears of targeting

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fbi-report-on-black-extremists-raises-fears-of-targeting/ar-BBFjXfT

    Border agent killed, partner injured by illegal immigrants using rocks, report says

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/fbi-investigating-border-patrol-agent-dies-duty-51269223

    But of course every crime they commit is because of evil white people keeping them down or kicking them out or whatever.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  111. Joe Hide says:

    I might have given more credibility to you writings Fred Reed, if You didn’t have the cultural marxist social justice warrior had it too good day care center nanny raised elitist habit of demeaning others with a rabid racist-like “Loony Right” mantra. If every bit of what you wrote is correct, you still lost over 1/2 the reader’s with this. Stop insulting your us and go logical and factual only. By the way, most of what you wrote was very good, but I don’t care now, because I think you hate me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  112. mobi says:
    @Truth
    Well now, if your first attempt at applying for a job, or trying to pick up a beautiful girl involved pulling your dick out, and it was unsuccessful...

    Well now, if your first attempt at applying for a job, or trying to pick up a beautiful girl involved pulling your dick out, and it was unsuccessful…

    If the quote you provided were ‘The definition of insanity is pulling your dick out in a job interview’

    then you would have a point…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Well now that would be insane; and so is continually writing articles that esteem Mestizos on a quasi white-nationalist website, with the intention of changing the minds of adults, now isn't it?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. Wally says: • Website
    @Vinteuil
    Wally, your constant, ineffectual shilling for that pathetic website is beyond ridiculous.

    Pretending that the Nazis didn't single out jews for special mistreatment just makes you look like a moron.

    I mean, what's your ultimate claim, here? That the Nazis didn't exterminate jews - they just enslaved them, in service of their campaign of extermination against the slavs?

    There are plenty of good reasons to question the disproportionate jewish influence on American politics. But you're not helping.

    Pay attention, clueless, false argument / strawman user.
    No one says they didn’t want Jews out of Germany & much of Europe, no one.

    And like the US put Japanese-Americans in concentration camps, the Germans put Jews in labor and relocation camps. Simple as that.

    So no, the Germans did not exterminate Jews. And you have no proof they did.

    [MORE]

    We’re talking about an alleged ’6M Jews & 5M others’ … 11,000,000.
    There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claim of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, 34,000 at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.

    If there was the alleged ‘plan to kill every Jew the Germans could get their hands on’ then why are there endless numbers of so called “survivor$”?

    Jews were no more ‘enslaved’ than Japanese-Americans or those in the Soviet gulags, Allied camps, etc.
    If you would get off your stupidity stool for a moment and look for the facts and not just accept Zionist propaganda you would learn something for a change.

    Say what you will, but dominance by disgusting Zionists will never end until the truth about their fake ’6M Jews’ is openly, publicly stated. They use that scam for bloody everything and you know it.
    That’s why it was fabricated in the 1st place. see below*

    Why have supremacist Jews have been marketing the ’6,000,000′ lie since at least 1869?
    http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. republic says:

    https://fredoneverything.org/p26/

    He wrote a short autobiography . He seems to admire Hunter S Thompson,Reed was born in 1945, in West Virginia, and was a police reporter for many years in Washington,DC.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  115. Living in an idyllic expatriate community, completely insulated from the realities of life in the OVERWHELMING majority of the country (aka: near-failed narcoterrorist state—i.e., “hell-hole” in the parlance of our time) makes Fred’s fond musings on our unwashed neighbors to the south worth exactly shit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  116. Truth says:
    @mobi

    Well now, if your first attempt at applying for a job, or trying to pick up a beautiful girl involved pulling your dick out, and it was unsuccessful…
     
    If the quote you provided were 'The definition of insanity is pulling your dick out in a job interview'

    then you would have a point...

    Well now that would be insane; and so is continually writing articles that esteem Mestizos on a quasi white-nationalist website, with the intention of changing the minds of adults, now isn’t it?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. Rurik says:

    I think you hate me.

    right now many Mexicans (and El Salvadorians and Somalis and Brazilians and Haitians and Kenyans…) are riled with hatred for Trump and his deplorables.

    They’ve enjoyed a trajectory in N. America where the working class (of all races) were expected to give up what little they had to make room for third world (yes, it exists) replacements. Who work cheaper and more importantly, were eventually going to be the demographic stake in whitey’s heart. The glee with which they all assumed whitey was not long for this world is incalculable, as they marched into Europe and Sweden and Texas and N. Carolina as conquering armies, even given preferential treatment over the indigenous citizens. Just consider, if a few more immigrants would have already been here, then Hillary would be in the White House right now.

    so now that Trump and his deplorables have slowed down that trajectory, they’re terrified that whitey might just remember when he had his nads, and decide to stay awhile. This is an existential crisis for La Raza and radical Jihad, BLM, SPLC and Fred.

    It’s isn’t that he hates (some ; ) of us, it’s that his crew down there are apoplectic over the news that whitey sill has some cojones, and they were all assuming his huevos had been rotted by guilt, and he was going to gently walk away from his civilizations and let the third worlders have it all if they just called him ‘racist’ a few more times.

    So Fred is doing damage control to all his butt-hurt Mexican neighbors, friends, family and associates who’re terrified that Trump is going to send tens of thousands of the worst violent criminals back down to Mexico, where crime is already a massive problem, where the cartels slaughter villagers if they even suspect someone snitched on them. Instead of keeping the floodgates open to an eventual Reconquista.

    Now, instead of the Reconquista, there may be throngs of ultra-violent rapists and murderers coming home to Mexico, instead of coddled in ‘sanctuary cities, and you can understand why Fred has to rail against Trump, or face some very angry faces for siding with the gringos.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  118. gustafus says:

    Fred is like so many men… especially the Brits. They go to the 3rd world for the women.

    Pliant, obedient, dumb as rocks…. but hey, maybe good head.

    I’ve just known too many men like this…. they like easy pickins …. and mouths shut.

    Well, sometimes open.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  119. @Linda Green
    Just another observation: A large contingent of native white American people have embraced the cultural rot largely emanated en masse by the #3's and their associates and fellow ideological travelers, and it is many of the good Christian Mexicans who these days care for their aging parents, particularly the absentee native whites who have fled their hometowns for the metros but have not made it big enough to put their parents in nursing homes. We can preen and shit talk latins all day long, but they maintain much stronger family ties, and to some degree, particularly their women, continue to possess traits that a large contingent of our women sold out long ago. Furthermore, they did so with the blessing and encouragement of our most esteemed leadership. I hope we rid our nation of these nefarious actors, but I'm not holding my breath.

    There comes a point where financialization, media, hype, marketing, keeping up with the Jones's, etc will no longer cover for our people's glaring deficiencies in these areas. Looking at the latest debt numbers from the St Louis FED, it appears the deficient contingent is back up to their eyeballs in debt, so don't expect any big changes in their behavior.

    Sad commentary on our side of the fence.

    We can preen and shit talk latins all day long, but they maintain much stronger family ties, and to some degree, particularly their women, continue to possess traits that a large contingent of our women sold out long ago.

    “Hispanics” in the US–that’s dominated by the Mexicans–have a 50%+ illegitimacy rate. That’s compared to something in the high 20s for whites.

    These numbers bounce around from year to year–with a general upward trend. But for 2014–the most recent data that popped for me–
    Illegitimacy:
    black — 71.2%
    Mexican origin — 51.6%
    non-Hispanic white 29.2%
    Asian — 16.4%

    They may have had strong family ties, but Mexican women are hardly showing “positive traits”. They look to be even sluttier and sloppier–and more civilization destroying–than white women.

    ~

    Here’s the CDC page i’m taking these numbers from:

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_12.pdf

    Read More
    • Replies: @Michelle
    On Monday, this week, whilst riding on the bus, I was privvy to a conversation between 2 immigrants, one Latin American and one African. Both women live in public, subsidized housing. The African lady, a native French speaker, was saying that she worked as a security guard. The Latina was volunteering at a "Non-profit" in hopes that would translate to an actual job as she was currently unemployed. She talked about her kids and it was clear that there was no husband in the picture. As we rode past some ticky-tacky, new, "Low income housing" both ladies perked up and said that they had put their names on the list to get a house. Seriously, I thought, I have nothing against either one of them, they seem like very nice people, but why are we giving recent immigrants tax payer subsidized public housing?? It just rubbed me the wrong way!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. Michelle says:
    @silviosilver

    Go into an ordinary bank, with which Mexico is littered. The clerks have to understand exchange rates, intermediate banks, SWIFT codes. They sit at computers, which are networked within the bank and with national headquarters, requiring network engineers and software weenies. Multitudinous ATMs require network people and maintainers. Telmex, the quite good telephone monopoly, needs people to program and maintain switches and associated software. So do TelCel and ATT, cell-phone providers. Airlines need pilots and trainers of pilots, people to run and maintain high-bypass turbofans and avionics, the instrument-landing systems (ILS). The internet needs software people, router techs, help-line techs when someone’s modem fails (the techs are good). Also doctors and dentists, universities to train them, people who understand and maintain MRI gear, the usual elaborate diagnostic instrumentation, mechanics to run the diagnostic computers at car dealerships and understand what lurks under the hoods of today’s cars (which would baffle Stephen Hawking). And so on at great length. Similar observations could be made of many Latin American and Asian countries. Starting from roughly zero a few decades ago.
     
    Someone needs to remind Fred that, as one American politico notoriously put it, "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best."

    Seriously, how does Fred imagine Mexico would react if America dumped the bottom ten percent of its population on Mexico, who not only crowded Mexicans out of their own cities, but insisted on speaking English instead of Spanish and celebrating the fourth of July instead of cinco de mayo?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. Michelle says:
    @AnotherDad

    We can preen and shit talk latins all day long, but they maintain much stronger family ties, and to some degree, particularly their women, continue to possess traits that a large contingent of our women sold out long ago.
     
    "Hispanics" in the US--that's dominated by the Mexicans--have a 50%+ illegitimacy rate. That's compared to something in the high 20s for whites.

    These numbers bounce around from year to year--with a general upward trend. But for 2014--the most recent data that popped for me--
    Illegitimacy:
    black -- 71.2%
    Mexican origin -- 51.6%
    non-Hispanic white 29.2%
    Asian -- 16.4%

    They may have had strong family ties, but Mexican women are hardly showing "positive traits". They look to be even sluttier and sloppier--and more civilization destroying--than white women.

    ~

    Here's the CDC page i'm taking these numbers from:
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_12.pdf

    On Monday, this week, whilst riding on the bus, I was privvy to a conversation between 2 immigrants, one Latin American and one African. Both women live in public, subsidized housing. The African lady, a native French speaker, was saying that she worked as a security guard. The Latina was volunteering at a “Non-profit” in hopes that would translate to an actual job as she was currently unemployed. She talked about her kids and it was clear that there was no husband in the picture. As we rode past some ticky-tacky, new, “Low income housing” both ladies perked up and said that they had put their names on the list to get a house. Seriously, I thought, I have nothing against either one of them, they seem like very nice people, but why are we giving recent immigrants tax payer subsidized public housing?? It just rubbed me the wrong way!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    If you can't beat em'...

    Put in your application, Babe.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. yeah says:
    @silviosilver

    Go into an ordinary bank, with which Mexico is littered. The clerks have to understand exchange rates, intermediate banks, SWIFT codes. They sit at computers, which are networked within the bank and with national headquarters, requiring network engineers and software weenies. Multitudinous ATMs require network people and maintainers. Telmex, the quite good telephone monopoly, needs people to program and maintain switches and associated software. So do TelCel and ATT, cell-phone providers. Airlines need pilots and trainers of pilots, people to run and maintain high-bypass turbofans and avionics, the instrument-landing systems (ILS). The internet needs software people, router techs, help-line techs when someone’s modem fails (the techs are good). Also doctors and dentists, universities to train them, people who understand and maintain MRI gear, the usual elaborate diagnostic instrumentation, mechanics to run the diagnostic computers at car dealerships and understand what lurks under the hoods of today’s cars (which would baffle Stephen Hawking). And so on at great length. Similar observations could be made of many Latin American and Asian countries. Starting from roughly zero a few decades ago.
     
    Someone needs to remind Fred that, as one American politico notoriously put it, "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best."

    Seriously, how does Fred imagine Mexico would react if America dumped the bottom ten percent of its population on Mexico, who not only crowded Mexicans out of their own cities, but insisted on speaking English instead of Spanish and celebrating the fourth of July instead of cinco de mayo?

    Re the constant refrain “when Mexico sends its people it doesn’t send its best”.

    First of all, Mexico doesn’t SEND anyone or anything: not people, not air, not even postcards. Emails and letters are sent, goods sold are sent (by ship, air, or truck), and livestock may be sent when sold. No Sir, people are NOT sent, because they, like wind, simply blow in through borders made porous, or drift past poorly manned borders, and sometimes whoosh in through the crevices. If air blows into your home, don’t blame the wind, blame your own negligence in shutting the windows or the shoddy workmanship of your builders.

    The Joe Blows blowing in from Mexico are just that: ordinary people looking to better their lives. In planned and managed numbers and quality, their influx can be mutually beneficial. As hordes of illegals, they are nothing but a disaster in the making.

    If the Democrats, the courts, the cute progressives, and the loony left have thrown open all windows, why blame those who then come in? A lot of dislike of Mexico is based on defective logic. Fault those who undermine laws and immigration control at home, not Mexico.

    Read More
    • Replies: @silviosilver
    Dude, it's just a figure of speech. No need to get hung on those words. Fact is, the Mexicans who come generally aren't worth having. A sane immigration policy would prevent their arrival. Simple as that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. @Monkeyboy
    Hey Fred, if Mexico is so great, why are so many people trying to leave?

    Because NAFTA destroyed Mexico’s rural family farm economy like it destroyed ours. Prior to NAFTA there was no major immigration problems relating to Mexico.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dan Hayes
    Carroll Price:

    I agree. The plutocrats who engineered NAFTA knew that cheap American foodstuffs would destroy indigenous Mexican farming and as a necessary byproduct force emigration to the US. It was deviously and deviliously ingenious.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. Dan Hayes says:
    @Carroll Price
    Because NAFTA destroyed Mexico's rural family farm economy like it destroyed ours. Prior to NAFTA there was no major immigration problems relating to Mexico.

    Carroll Price:

    I agree. The plutocrats who engineered NAFTA knew that cheap American foodstuffs would destroy indigenous Mexican farming and as a necessary byproduct force emigration to the US. It was deviously and deviliously ingenious.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    https://www.commondreams.org/views/2014/01/10/after-20-years-nafta-leaves-mexicos-economy-ruins
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. @Thomm

    And Diversity + Proximity = War
     
    False. The 'other' always gets reclassified as 'white' over time, with the exception of blacks. WNs go along with it (which is why you now consider Italians, Poles, and Jews as white, whereas you did not before).

    Ron Unz has done yeoman work in proving statistically that 2nd-gen Mexican-Americans don't have a higher crime rate than whites.

    Plus, Heartiste is a pickup artist. He has singlehandedly taught thousands of colored men how to bed white women. What do you think about that?

    Nice try at moving the goal post. I didn’t mention crime. The studies listed at the Chateau don’t refer to crime. Here’s a sampling:

    Social trust is negatively affected by ethnic diversity, case study in Denmark from 1979 to the present. Link.
    – Ethnic homogeneity and Protestant traditions positively impact individual and societal levels of social trust. Link.
    – “In longitudinal perspective, [across European regions], an increase in immigration is related to a decrease in social trust.” Link.

    No cigar for you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm
    Yeah, that is why Europeans were killing each other by the millions at all times until 1945.

    You can define diversity endlessly. The mostly French city of Brussels is surrounded by the Flemish, who stage demonstrations against the French all the time.

    The definition of who is the same, and who is different, keeps changing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. @Dan Hayes
    Carroll Price:

    I agree. The plutocrats who engineered NAFTA knew that cheap American foodstuffs would destroy indigenous Mexican farming and as a necessary byproduct force emigration to the US. It was deviously and deviliously ingenious.

    Read More
    • Agree: Dan Hayes
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. JSM says:
    @Kid Droid
    Yup, nothing has ever been invented by Mexicans, not even that whole American Cowboy thing either:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mexican_inventions_and_discoveries

    I always laugh when you POC-apologists give these lists of inventions.

    Talk about damning with faint praise!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. Rurik says:

    the reason this charming Mexican American female is worth watching (for as long as you can stand) is to get a glimmer at what ((they’re)) putting into these people’s minds in the universities. Which is that whites are guilty and wrong (and evil) and that they (first class / Affirmative Action citizens) are not obliged by the ‘white man’s’ laws. (“fuck your laws”) To the point of being brash and in-your-face about it. Even taking the hat off your head, (literally) if they disapprove of it’s political message. And expecting the victim of the crime to be punished.

    There’s a lot there really. The joys of diversity, the level of academic excellence on campus, the pure, raw hatred in her eyes as she’s accusing him of genocide and of stealing the (her) land.

    here a college professor calls the Deplorables ‘white supremacists’ and says

    “We have been assaulted. It’s an act of terrorism. One of the most frightening things for me and most of the people in my life is that the people creating the assault are among us.”

    and this is what they’re teaching here in the ZUSA. One can only imagine what they’re saying about Trump and the Deplorables down in Mexico. On the campuses and in the streets and dinner tables.

    There is anger and rage and race hate seething under the surface, as these people have been told that whitey is an evil racist oppressor, and that he is going to get his comeuppance and soon!

    And sure enough, they’ve been able to demographically seize entire states away from whitey and make them their own. They’ve effectively ‘Reconquista’d California, and the dominoes were all ready to fall.

    There’s a lot of anger down there isn’t there Fred?

    Fred speaks of the charms of Mexico and the relative likeability of Mexicans, and I agree wholeheartedly. But even here in the states, when you talk to Hispanics, (I know and work with lots of them), there is an obsession with Trump. This is supposed to be the century when Western civilization falls. When La Raza is triumphant, and whitey is finally, at long last, put in his place. That all may yet happen, but just as with the poor Zionists who demanded the Golan Heights, and the Saudis who wanted Iran destroyed utterly, and the neo-Nazis in Ukraine who wanted to put their boot on Russian necks, and so many other butt-hurt losers and assholes the world over… Hillary is not in the White House. Sorry Fred.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  129. Why should Americans tolerate illegal Latinos especially since all Latinos are a federal designated protected class group?

    As a federal protected class group, both legal and illegal Latinos in the US receive federal group entitlements denied to other Americans.

    Democrats and neocons exploit Latino’s protected class group status, a status they helped to create, to buy Latino votes using new federal entitlements for Latinos.

    Here’s a sampling of existing federal entitlements for Latinos:

    1. Government enforced Affirmative Action for Latinos and Hispanics
    2. Government 8A set-aside contracts for Latino and Hispanic owned businesses
    3. Violent Latino criminal organizations operate freely in public (La Raza , MS-13, Latin Kings, etc )
    4. Slavish government support for Latinos in colleges and Latino scholarship programs
    5. Politically partisan Latino churches and associations granted tax exempt status
    6. Most Latino children’s welfare financed by US taxpayers
    7. Government anti-discrimination laws enforcement biased for Latinos
    8. Federal hate speech crime prosecutions biased in favor of Latinos, and other protected groups
    9. Preferential immigration, asylum, and citizenship for Latinos
    10. Disproportionate number of Latinos in cushy federal government employment
    11. Latino voters not required to display government issued photo ID to vote in public elections
    12.Latino civil right organizations financed and led by filthy rich Diversity leaders
    13. Unbelievably stupid and biased Latino members of the US congress (Luis Gutierrez, Tom Perez, etc)
    14. Latino dominated cities and colleges bailed out by county, state and federal taxpayer
    15. Latino history month
    16. Ridiculous Latino studies in public schools and colleges
    17. Banks forced by the fedgov to give loans to Latinos with bad credit
    18. Latinos go unprosecuted for hoax hate crimes
    19. Latino Hispanic Caucus in the US congress
    20. Sanctuary cities allowed for illegal alien Latinos and Hispanics
    21. Latino and Hispanic only organizations allowed by law, white-only organizations outlawed
    22. Feds assist Latinos to extort money and concessions from local city tax payers
    23. White Privilege nonsense taught in public schools and universities.
    24. Latino and Hispanic scholarships allowed in public colleges, white scholarships are illegal and demonized.
    25. Lowered academic and performance standards for Latinos and other protected class people in public service jobs
    26. Federal government coerces private businesses to implement Latino diversity policies, or else suffer federal prosecution, denial of tax breaks and business licenses, and denial of federal contracts.
    27. Latinos and Hispanics receive government sponsored grants to attend college, white Christian people get primarily loans.
    28. Frequent federal interference in local government prosecution of violent Latino criminals
    29 Blanket amnesty and citizenship for illegal Latinos
    30. Illegal alien Latinos employed in government jobs and public schools and colleges
    31. Illegal alien Latinos enticed to join US military in exchange for fast track US citizenship
    32. Illegal alien Latinos allowed to vote in US public office elections

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    you seriously need to read the article. fred wasn't talking about illegals.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. @yeah
    Re the constant refrain "when Mexico sends its people it doesn't send its best".

    First of all, Mexico doesn't SEND anyone or anything: not people, not air, not even postcards. Emails and letters are sent, goods sold are sent (by ship, air, or truck), and livestock may be sent when sold. No Sir, people are NOT sent, because they, like wind, simply blow in through borders made porous, or drift past poorly manned borders, and sometimes whoosh in through the crevices. If air blows into your home, don't blame the wind, blame your own negligence in shutting the windows or the shoddy workmanship of your builders.

    The Joe Blows blowing in from Mexico are just that: ordinary people looking to better their lives. In planned and managed numbers and quality, their influx can be mutually beneficial. As hordes of illegals, they are nothing but a disaster in the making.

    If the Democrats, the courts, the cute progressives, and the loony left have thrown open all windows, why blame those who then come in? A lot of dislike of Mexico is based on defective logic. Fault those who undermine laws and immigration control at home, not Mexico.

    Dude, it’s just a figure of speech. No need to get hung on those words. Fact is, the Mexicans who come generally aren’t worth having. A sane immigration policy would prevent their arrival. Simple as that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. @Joe Franklin
    Why should Americans tolerate illegal Latinos especially since all Latinos are a federal designated protected class group?

    As a federal protected class group, both legal and illegal Latinos in the US receive federal group entitlements denied to other Americans.

    Democrats and neocons exploit Latino's protected class group status, a status they helped to create, to buy Latino votes using new federal entitlements for Latinos.

    Here's a sampling of existing federal entitlements for Latinos:



    1. Government enforced Affirmative Action for Latinos and Hispanics
    2. Government 8A set-aside contracts for Latino and Hispanic owned businesses
    3. Violent Latino criminal organizations operate freely in public (La Raza , MS-13, Latin Kings, etc )
    4. Slavish government support for Latinos in colleges and Latino scholarship programs
    5. Politically partisan Latino churches and associations granted tax exempt status
    6. Most Latino children’s welfare financed by US taxpayers
    7. Government anti-discrimination laws enforcement biased for Latinos
    8. Federal hate speech crime prosecutions biased in favor of Latinos, and other protected groups
    9. Preferential immigration, asylum, and citizenship for Latinos
    10. Disproportionate number of Latinos in cushy federal government employment
    11. Latino voters not required to display government issued photo ID to vote in public elections
    12.Latino civil right organizations financed and led by filthy rich Diversity leaders
    13. Unbelievably stupid and biased Latino members of the US congress (Luis Gutierrez, Tom Perez, etc)
    14. Latino dominated cities and colleges bailed out by county, state and federal taxpayer
    15. Latino history month
    16. Ridiculous Latino studies in public schools and colleges
    17. Banks forced by the fedgov to give loans to Latinos with bad credit
    18. Latinos go unprosecuted for hoax hate crimes
    19. Latino Hispanic Caucus in the US congress
    20. Sanctuary cities allowed for illegal alien Latinos and Hispanics
    21. Latino and Hispanic only organizations allowed by law, white-only organizations outlawed
    22. Feds assist Latinos to extort money and concessions from local city tax payers
    23. White Privilege nonsense taught in public schools and universities.
    24. Latino and Hispanic scholarships allowed in public colleges, white scholarships are illegal and demonized.
    25. Lowered academic and performance standards for Latinos and other protected class people in public service jobs
    26. Federal government coerces private businesses to implement Latino diversity policies, or else suffer federal prosecution, denial of tax breaks and business licenses, and denial of federal contracts.
    27. Latinos and Hispanics receive government sponsored grants to attend college, white Christian people get primarily loans.
    28. Frequent federal interference in local government prosecution of violent Latino criminals
    29 Blanket amnesty and citizenship for illegal Latinos
    30. Illegal alien Latinos employed in government jobs and public schools and colleges
    31. Illegal alien Latinos enticed to join US military in exchange for fast track US citizenship
    32. Illegal alien Latinos allowed to vote in US public office elections

    you seriously need to read the article. fred wasn’t talking about illegals.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. @Hank Rearden
    You ask: What’s the ‘Muricans problem with people who have a little melanin in their skin?

    Darker Skin = Higher Aggression + Lower IQ.

    "Studies find that darker pigmented people average higher levels of aggression and sexual activity (and also lower IQ)."

    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840
     
    And Diversity + Proximity = War

    Courtesy of reader chris, a large (and growing) reference list of studies finding strong and accumulating evidence for the Chateau Heartiste maxim that Diversity™ + Proximity = War by Various Means. Feel free to link to this post on social media platforms or drop it in a clown world combox whenever a shitlib smugly wanders into your shitlord kill zone, begging for a hail of hot Realtalk™.

    Diversity + Proximity = War
    heartiste.wordpress.com/diversity-proximity-war-the-reference-list/
     

    I read the cited ‘study’…and it invalidates itself right in the conclusion: “The correlations between human pigmentation, aggression, and sexuality (and IQ), is further supported by the anthropological and sociological research…” Correlation is not causation. I think it would strike most anyone as absurd to exclude sociological and economic influences as they relate to incarceration rates for violent crime, than the significance of genetic composition.

    Crime statistics show that black on black crime is much more likely than black on anyone else. It’s not a governmental study by a ‘leading’ researcher, but reading the Chicago Tribune or Baltimore Sun for a month would validate this assessment. So, do blacks in Chicago violently aggress against one another because they have more melanin, or due to other factors: limited economic opportunity? poor living conditions? a cultural/tribal need to acquire ‘street cred’, to move up the cultural hierarchy by out-violencing the violent? a cultural idealization (via music, TV and movies) of ‘thug life’ as being glamorous and desirable? failure of our educational system? simply boredom? Equal parts of all of these? Half of these reasons, plus 20 others? Honestly, I don’t know, but genetics would seem to pale (no pun intended) in comparison. It strikes me as the $64,000 question, and one that society has been incapable of answering correctly, and I have serious doubts that it ever will.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hank Rearden
    "Correlation is not causation."

    Wrong. Now you get taken behind the ol' woodshed for your misunderstanding of science for a bit of an intellectual spanking.

    The shortest true statement that can be made about causality and correlation is one of the following: (a) "Empirically observed covariation is a necessary but not sufficient condition for causality." (b) "Correlation is not causation but it sure is a hint."

    wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation
     
    Next time, use the shortest true statement. No more lying by omission!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. Truth says:
    @Michelle
    On Monday, this week, whilst riding on the bus, I was privvy to a conversation between 2 immigrants, one Latin American and one African. Both women live in public, subsidized housing. The African lady, a native French speaker, was saying that she worked as a security guard. The Latina was volunteering at a "Non-profit" in hopes that would translate to an actual job as she was currently unemployed. She talked about her kids and it was clear that there was no husband in the picture. As we rode past some ticky-tacky, new, "Low income housing" both ladies perked up and said that they had put their names on the list to get a house. Seriously, I thought, I have nothing against either one of them, they seem like very nice people, but why are we giving recent immigrants tax payer subsidized public housing?? It just rubbed me the wrong way!

    If you can’t beat em’…

    Put in your application, Babe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Michelle
    Gawd, the buildings are so ugly. Although, they are close to a supermarket and a Target store. Nah, I make too much money and already own a home, even if it was built in 1912 and is only 420 SQ feet. They would never consider my application, even if I do speak Spanish.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. Vidi says:

    Dr. Miguel Alcubierre, known for the “Alcubierre warp drive”, is a Mexican.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    Nice! Theoretical physics does seem to impress the IQ crowd. My friend's excellent Latina dentist seems fairly ho-hum in comparison.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. @Thomm

    How so? The U.S. did great when it was 90% white, and in fact our standard of living was the highest in the world.
     
    There was never a time like this. The time you are referring to (1925-1975) was also when Italians, Poles, and Jews were not considered white.

    Sure it was 85% white under TODAY's definition of 'white', but not under the contemporary definition of 'white'. This is what WN idiots never grasp.

    Under the 1870 definition of 'white', only 20% of Americans are white (even Irish were excluded from this definition). But in the future, Hispanics in Asians will be reclassified as 'white', and White Nationalists will go along with it, just like they did in the past.

    Texas, always ahead of the curve, declared that the Texas definition of white is that 'anyone who is not black, is white', which also ties to what Steve Sailer pointed out about African vs. non-African genetics.

    Sure it was 85% white under TODAY’s definition of ‘white’, but not under the contemporary definition of ‘white’

    This doesn’t even make sense. And neither do you. I think you need a nap.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm
    I explained it clearly. But since White Trashionalists have Negro IQs, you did not understand.

    In 1900, Irish were not considered white. In 1950, Italians, Jews, and Poles were not considered white.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. Michelle says:
    @Truth
    If you can't beat em'...

    Put in your application, Babe.

    Gawd, the buildings are so ugly. Although, they are close to a supermarket and a Target store. Nah, I make too much money and already own a home, even if it was built in 1912 and is only 420 SQ feet. They would never consider my application, even if I do speak Spanish.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. LauraMR says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    Why is organized crime such a feature, then? In many ways, it doesn't sound like even a state that has control over areas of itself.

    Then?

    Do you mean Fred lied about his representation of Mexico?

    If so, please provide the information that proves those universities/graduates, banks, etc, in short, the infrastructure and demographics he describes do not in fact exist.

    I’m curious.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. LauraMR says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    Why is organized crime such a feature, then? In many ways, it doesn't sound like even a state that has control over areas of itself.

    Then?

    Do you mean Fred lied about his representation of Mexico?

    If so, please provide the information that proves those universities/graduates, banks, etc, in short, the infrastructure and demographics he describes do not in fact exist.

    I’m curious.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. RobinG says:
    @Vidi
    Dr. Miguel Alcubierre, known for the "Alcubierre warp drive", is a Mexican.

    Nice! Theoretical physics does seem to impress the IQ crowd. My friend’s excellent Latina dentist seems fairly ho-hum in comparison.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. Fred has become a broken record. The loon right? What crap. Mexico is a mess. So is the US thanks to illegal immigrants from Mexico who are draining every American taxpayer for benefits they aren’t entitled to.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  141. Thomm says:
    @Hank Rearden
    Nice try at moving the goal post. I didn't mention crime. The studies listed at the Chateau don't refer to crime. Here's a sampling:

    Social trust is negatively affected by ethnic diversity, case study in Denmark from 1979 to the present. Link.
    – Ethnic homogeneity and Protestant traditions positively impact individual and societal levels of social trust. Link.
    – “In longitudinal perspective, [across European regions], an increase in immigration is related to a decrease in social trust.” Link.
     
    No cigar for you.

    Yeah, that is why Europeans were killing each other by the millions at all times until 1945.

    You can define diversity endlessly. The mostly French city of Brussels is surrounded by the Flemish, who stage demonstrations against the French all the time.

    The definition of who is the same, and who is different, keeps changing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hank Rearden
    That's right, we Whites love war. Nobody does it better. Problem?

    ♫ let me make this clear to anti-Whites out there
    who seem to feel so safe poking the bear
    just because we're nice now and act all tender
    doesn't mean we are weak and will just surrender
    two thousand years history, we never had peace
    buried Arabs and Jews and expanded colonies
    Whites love war more than anything else
    when we get bored we even fight among ourselves

    non-White intruders we genocide as brothers
    and then go right back to killing one another
    so what the fuck makes think it's a good idea
    to mess with the White man you should fear ♪

    Mr. Bond 16-06-28 Goyz-N-Europe (Eazy-E Boyz-N-Tha Hood Parody)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kofmRU8Y1cc
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. Thomm says:
    @Frankie P
    Fool, the immigrants that you refer to as "not white" happened to share the same cultural roots, similar religious beliefs (not the Jews, and I NEVER say "Judeo-Christian") and an ability and desire to assimilate and become part of the "American dream". If immigration had continued in this trajectory, the US would be much stronger today. Unfortunately, the trajectory was changed 180 degrees, and now only those with different cultural roots are welcome.

    Fool, the immigrants that you refer to as “not white” happened to share the same cultural roots, similar religious beliefs (not the Jews, and I NEVER say “Judeo-Christian”) and an ability and desire to assimilate and become part of the “American dream”.

    No, faggot. The Irish were emphatically considered non-white, and later the Italians were also considered non-white. And not just because Irish and Italians were Catholic.

    Get a clue. Read about ‘No Irish Need Apply’ signs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II

    No, faggot. The Irish were emphatically considered non-white, and later the Italians were also considered non-white. And not just because Irish and Italians were Catholic.

    Get a clue. Read about ‘No Irish Need Apply’ signs.
     
    this is so fucking true. wonder how many remember or read about this.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. Thomm says:
    @Bragadocious
    Sure it was 85% white under TODAY’s definition of ‘white’, but not under the contemporary definition of ‘white’

    This doesn't even make sense. And neither do you. I think you need a nap.

    I explained it clearly. But since White Trashionalists have Negro IQs, you did not understand.

    In 1900, Irish were not considered white. In 1950, Italians, Jews, and Poles were not considered white.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bragadocious
    "White trashionalists" LOL. What a clever wordsmith you are, Apu. I can only think of the lyrics from Bengalis in Platforms. "He only wants to impress you." And you've dotally done that!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. @Thomm
    Yeah, that is why Europeans were killing each other by the millions at all times until 1945.

    You can define diversity endlessly. The mostly French city of Brussels is surrounded by the Flemish, who stage demonstrations against the French all the time.

    The definition of who is the same, and who is different, keeps changing.

    That’s right, we Whites love war. Nobody does it better. Problem?

    ♫ let me make this clear to anti-Whites out there
    who seem to feel so safe poking the bear
    just because we’re nice now and act all tender
    doesn’t mean we are weak and will just surrender
    two thousand years history, we never had peace
    buried Arabs and Jews and expanded colonies
    Whites love war more than anything else
    when we get bored we even fight among ourselves

    non-White intruders we genocide as brothers
    and then go right back to killing one another
    so what the fuck makes think it’s a good idea
    to mess with the White man you should fear ♪

    Mr. Bond 16-06-28 Goyz-N-Europe (Eazy-E Boyz-N-Tha Hood Parody)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kofmRU8Y1cc

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    True. As a white European man, I'm willing to fight and perish (and watch all my loved ones perish) if we can remove the parasite from the face of humanity. We'll do it for our children and no deformed sub-culture with promises of being the chosen ones can top that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. @Thomm
    I explained it clearly. But since White Trashionalists have Negro IQs, you did not understand.

    In 1900, Irish were not considered white. In 1950, Italians, Jews, and Poles were not considered white.

    “White trashionalists” LOL. What a clever wordsmith you are, Apu. I can only think of the lyrics from Bengalis in Platforms. “He only wants to impress you.” And you’ve dotally done that!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hank Rearden
    Thomm obviously doesn't know what the word "nation" means, as it stems from L. natal, meaning birth. A nation is people related by birth. "White Nationalist" or "Black Nationalist" or "Chicano Nationalist" is simply redundant.

    Oh, I'll wager Thomm never critiques La Raza (The Race.) Just Whites. Why is that?
    , @Astuteobservor II
    and you just tried to dodge the point by attacking him instead of the point :)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. @Bragadocious
    "White trashionalists" LOL. What a clever wordsmith you are, Apu. I can only think of the lyrics from Bengalis in Platforms. "He only wants to impress you." And you've dotally done that!

    Thomm obviously doesn’t know what the word “nation” means, as it stems from L. natal, meaning birth. A nation is people related by birth. “White Nationalist” or “Black Nationalist” or “Chicano Nationalist” is simply redundant.

    Oh, I’ll wager Thomm never critiques La Raza (The Race.) Just Whites. Why is that?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    Oh, I’ll wager Thomm never critiques La Raza (The Race.) Just Whites. Why is that?
     
    Of course I criticize them, you stupid wigger.

    The thing is, you are just as bad as they are. WNs have no more in common with successful whites (like me), than a chihuahua has with a German Shepherd.

    WNs just want to take credit for the work of others that they have nothing in common with other than shared ancestry from Europe centuries ago.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Hank Rearden
    That's right, we Whites love war. Nobody does it better. Problem?

    ♫ let me make this clear to anti-Whites out there
    who seem to feel so safe poking the bear
    just because we're nice now and act all tender
    doesn't mean we are weak and will just surrender
    two thousand years history, we never had peace
    buried Arabs and Jews and expanded colonies
    Whites love war more than anything else
    when we get bored we even fight among ourselves

    non-White intruders we genocide as brothers
    and then go right back to killing one another
    so what the fuck makes think it's a good idea
    to mess with the White man you should fear ♪

    Mr. Bond 16-06-28 Goyz-N-Europe (Eazy-E Boyz-N-Tha Hood Parody)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kofmRU8Y1cc
     

    True. As a white European man, I’m willing to fight and perish (and watch all my loved ones perish) if we can remove the parasite from the face of humanity. We’ll do it for our children and no deformed sub-culture with promises of being the chosen ones can top that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    Silly little white man. Humanity - including you and your melanin deficient tribe - is the parasite. At least you acknowledge your anonymity.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. @Thomm

    Fool, the immigrants that you refer to as “not white” happened to share the same cultural roots, similar religious beliefs (not the Jews, and I NEVER say “Judeo-Christian”) and an ability and desire to assimilate and become part of the “American dream”.
     
    No, faggot. The Irish were emphatically considered non-white, and later the Italians were also considered non-white. And not just because Irish and Italians were Catholic.

    Get a clue. Read about 'No Irish Need Apply' signs.

    No, faggot. The Irish were emphatically considered non-white, and later the Italians were also considered non-white. And not just because Irish and Italians were Catholic.

    Get a clue. Read about ‘No Irish Need Apply’ signs.

    this is so fucking true. wonder how many remember or read about this.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Quite a lot of people read about Irish and Italians being nonwhite but nobody remembers it, because it didn't happen. In census records, in the fair number of Southern Irish slaveholders, they were always white.
    , @Thomm
    Indeed. Here is a drawing from Harpers that appeared in the NYT in 1899, or just 118 years ago. Irish were considered ape-like :

    http://www.strangehistory.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/irish-african.jpg

    The WNs of the time were just as opposed to the Irish then as they are to Mexicans today. Countless films were also about this (Gangs of New York, with Daniel Day Lewis and Liam Neeson, among them).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. @Bragadocious
    "White trashionalists" LOL. What a clever wordsmith you are, Apu. I can only think of the lyrics from Bengalis in Platforms. "He only wants to impress you." And you've dotally done that!

    and you just tried to dodge the point by attacking him instead of the point :)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bragadocious
    Ok, troll feeder. Have at it.

    P.S. there was no point
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. RobinG says:
    @Anonymous
    True. As a white European man, I'm willing to fight and perish (and watch all my loved ones perish) if we can remove the parasite from the face of humanity. We'll do it for our children and no deformed sub-culture with promises of being the chosen ones can top that.

    Silly little white man. Humanity – including you and your melanin deficient tribe – is the parasite. At least you acknowledge your anonymity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hank Rearden
    Only White Men have walked on the moon. They rode on a rocket designed by a Nazi. Sour grapes much?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. @Astuteobservor II
    and you just tried to dodge the point by attacking him instead of the point :)

    Ok, troll feeder. Have at it.

    P.S. there was no point

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    you need to work on your dexterity :) hahahaahh
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. Why Fred, we really thought Mexico had no functioning banks, universities, mobile networks, airports and hospitals. Your reports from the shithole Mexico are, at least to me, quite shocking.

    Honestly Fred, you should take care of the now defunct Ask a Mexican! column now that Gustavo went back to real cherry picking.

    Now, tell us more about Mexican sofisticated bank clerks and state of the art infrastructures.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  153. @Bragadocious
    Ok, troll feeder. Have at it.

    P.S. there was no point

    you need to work on your dexterity :) hahahaahh

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Restate "the point" if it can be done without throwing in random insults which seem to be the whole of the message, and then reasonable discourse can be held.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Astuteobservor II

    No, faggot. The Irish were emphatically considered non-white, and later the Italians were also considered non-white. And not just because Irish and Italians were Catholic.

    Get a clue. Read about ‘No Irish Need Apply’ signs.
     
    this is so fucking true. wonder how many remember or read about this.

    Quite a lot of people read about Irish and Italians being nonwhite but nobody remembers it, because it didn’t happen. In census records, in the fair number of Southern Irish slaveholders, they were always white.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Astuteobservor II
    you need to work on your dexterity :) hahahaahh

    Restate “the point” if it can be done without throwing in random insults which seem to be the whole of the message, and then reasonable discourse can be held.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    Before we can discuss anything, get a handle first :)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. “For many years, until 1910, Mexico was run by Europeans, lastly under Porfirio Diaz, for the benefit of Europeans.”

    Still is, as you can see from these pictures. Look at the section titled Modern Mexico 1934 – present.

    https://infogalactic.com/info/List_of_heads_of_state_of_Mexico

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  157. O'Coner says:

    Hi Fred, I guess I’m your neighbor! Thanks so much for writing an article setting the record straight. I’ve gotten cynical about trying to inform people in the U.S.. I also worry that if the people knew what a good little thing we’ve got going down here, we’d get inundated. Take Care.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein

    I also worry that if the people knew what a good little thing we’ve got going down here, we’d get inundated. Take Care.
     
    You mean like the good little thing that used to be the United States of America before we got inundated with 40 million of your gifts of love?

    Word to the wise, O'Coner. Stay right where you are. Don't show your face north of the border again.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. @O'Coner
    Hi Fred, I guess I'm your neighbor! Thanks so much for writing an article setting the record straight. I've gotten cynical about trying to inform people in the U.S.. I also worry that if the people knew what a good little thing we've got going down here, we'd get inundated. Take Care.

    I also worry that if the people knew what a good little thing we’ve got going down here, we’d get inundated. Take Care.

    You mean like the good little thing that used to be the United States of America before we got inundated with 40 million of your gifts of love?

    Word to the wise, O’Coner. Stay right where you are. Don’t show your face north of the border again.

    Read More
    • Replies: @O'Coner
    I'll keep that in mind when I'm up there next week picking up my check, Unintelligent Dasin. Now bugger off, Troll.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. O'Coner says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    I also worry that if the people knew what a good little thing we’ve got going down here, we’d get inundated. Take Care.
     
    You mean like the good little thing that used to be the United States of America before we got inundated with 40 million of your gifts of love?

    Word to the wise, O'Coner. Stay right where you are. Don't show your face north of the border again.

    I’ll keep that in mind when I’m up there next week picking up my check, Unintelligent Dasin. Now bugger off, Troll.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. O'Coner says:
    @Brabantian
    With a positive experience of Mexicans myself, I share some of Fred's thinking, and see favourable Mexican-Anglo relations as a good thing for North America's future ... but my guess is that for some readers here, their impression of the Spanish-speaking presence in the USA is a little more along the lines of this photo of an expressive pretty Latina
    https://dezinfo.net/images3/image/09.2010/neleg/1040.jpg

    That’s because as Fred’s saying, the MSM shares that (absolutely genuine) photo nationally. But Border Patrol’s continuous confrontations with ‘activists’ stationed at the border, throwing rocks and such to try to foment an incident are only reported locally. I’ve seen many many incidents. Example : I saw BP evict a trailer encampment in Jacumba Ca. (nice SPA) around 2004. They said they we’re affiliated with a well known org. They sat around, well armed, drank beer, cussed mexicans, and threw rock. They eventually hit some people on the other side with rocks and BP who has been surrrounding them moved in and, I believe charges were filed. Locals, (perhaps, excepting beer and ammo merchants) were pleased. This incident was well publicized locally. Coincidentally, I haven’t heard much about the militia style border helper ‘activist’ organizations since that confrontation. This is all easy to confirm. But you have to look for it! :-(

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. Thomm says:
    @Astuteobservor II

    No, faggot. The Irish were emphatically considered non-white, and later the Italians were also considered non-white. And not just because Irish and Italians were Catholic.

    Get a clue. Read about ‘No Irish Need Apply’ signs.
     
    this is so fucking true. wonder how many remember or read about this.

    Indeed. Here is a drawing from Harpers that appeared in the NYT in 1899, or just 118 years ago. Irish were considered ape-like :

    The WNs of the time were just as opposed to the Irish then as they are to Mexicans today. Countless films were also about this (Gangs of New York, with Daniel Day Lewis and Liam Neeson, among them).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Gangs of New York was produced in ... 2002. Not 1902. It is not a documentary. There were no "WNs", your apparently ubiquitous bugbear, in 1902.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. @RobinG
    Silly little white man. Humanity - including you and your melanin deficient tribe - is the parasite. At least you acknowledge your anonymity.

    Only White Men have walked on the moon. They rode on a rocket designed by a Nazi. Sour grapes much?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    No, actually no one has walked the moon, that's all a fraud.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. Thomm says:
    @Hank Rearden
    Thomm obviously doesn't know what the word "nation" means, as it stems from L. natal, meaning birth. A nation is people related by birth. "White Nationalist" or "Black Nationalist" or "Chicano Nationalist" is simply redundant.

    Oh, I'll wager Thomm never critiques La Raza (The Race.) Just Whites. Why is that?

    Oh, I’ll wager Thomm never critiques La Raza (The Race.) Just Whites. Why is that?

    Of course I criticize them, you stupid wigger.

    The thing is, you are just as bad as they are. WNs have no more in common with successful whites (like me), than a chihuahua has with a German Shepherd.

    WNs just want to take credit for the work of others that they have nothing in common with other than shared ancestry from Europe centuries ago.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hank Rearden
    Successful whites (like me)?

    Oh boy, we've got a badass here!

    Now let's check Thomm's logic as it changes from sentence to sentence. You say you have no more common with your fellow whites "than a chihuahua has with a German Shepherd," and then you turn right around and posit "shared ancestry."

    Which is it?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Thomm
    Indeed. Here is a drawing from Harpers that appeared in the NYT in 1899, or just 118 years ago. Irish were considered ape-like :

    http://www.strangehistory.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/irish-african.jpg

    The WNs of the time were just as opposed to the Irish then as they are to Mexicans today. Countless films were also about this (Gangs of New York, with Daniel Day Lewis and Liam Neeson, among them).

    Gangs of New York was produced in … 2002. Not 1902. It is not a documentary. There were no “WNs”, your apparently ubiquitous bugbear, in 1902.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    Gangs of New York was produced in … 2002. Not 1902. It is not a documentary. There were no “WNs”, your apparently ubiquitous bugbear, in 1902.
     
    Even you can't be that dumb.

    The movie was made in 2002, but the period setting was 1846 and then 1858. Bill the Butcher (Lewis) was vocal about how he hated the Irish.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3s2d3kkP1rg

    Anyone who know anything about history knows that many 'whites' of today, were not considered 'whites' at various points in history.

    Under the 1900 definition of white, if applied today, only 20% of Americans are 'white'.

    In addition, don't forget the One Drop Rule, which would disqualify almost all Americans of today other than the Amish and Utah Mormons, and recent Eastern European immigrants.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. Thomm says:
    @Anon
    Gangs of New York was produced in ... 2002. Not 1902. It is not a documentary. There were no "WNs", your apparently ubiquitous bugbear, in 1902.

    Gangs of New York was produced in … 2002. Not 1902. It is not a documentary. There were no “WNs”, your apparently ubiquitous bugbear, in 1902.

    Even you can’t be that dumb.

    The movie was made in 2002, but the period setting was 1846 and then 1858. Bill the Butcher (Lewis) was vocal about how he hated the Irish.

    Anyone who know anything about history knows that many ‘whites’ of today, were not considered ‘whites’ at various points in history.

    Under the 1900 definition of white, if applied today, only 20% of Americans are ‘white’.

    In addition, don’t forget the One Drop Rule, which would disqualify almost all Americans of today other than the Amish and Utah Mormons, and recent Eastern European immigrants.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon

    Under the 1900 definition of white, if applied today, only 20% of Americans are ‘white’.
     
    https://www.census.gov/history/www/through_the_decades/index_of_questions/1900_1.html:

    Color or Race

    Enumerators were to mark "W" for White, "B" for Black, "Ch" for Chinese, "Jp" for Japanese, or "In" for American Indian.
     
    I'll give you three guesses as to how a gossoon named O'Malley would have been counted.


    The movie was made in 2002, but the period setting was 1846 and then 1858. Bill the Butcher (Lewis) was vocal about how he hated the Irish.
     

    Countless films were also about this
     

     
    I don't know how to tell you this, but this is fictional dialogue written in 2002.

    Were there ethnic tensions? Yes. Does this mean your argument, to the extent you have one, makes any sense? No.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Thomm

    Gangs of New York was produced in … 2002. Not 1902. It is not a documentary. There were no “WNs”, your apparently ubiquitous bugbear, in 1902.
     
    Even you can't be that dumb.

    The movie was made in 2002, but the period setting was 1846 and then 1858. Bill the Butcher (Lewis) was vocal about how he hated the Irish.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3s2d3kkP1rg

    Anyone who know anything about history knows that many 'whites' of today, were not considered 'whites' at various points in history.

    Under the 1900 definition of white, if applied today, only 20% of Americans are 'white'.

    In addition, don't forget the One Drop Rule, which would disqualify almost all Americans of today other than the Amish and Utah Mormons, and recent Eastern European immigrants.

    Under the 1900 definition of white, if applied today, only 20% of Americans are ‘white’.

    https://www.census.gov/history/www/through_the_decades/index_of_questions/1900_1.html:

    Color or Race

    Enumerators were to mark “W” for White, “B” for Black, “Ch” for Chinese, “Jp” for Japanese, or “In” for American Indian.

    I’ll give you three guesses as to how a gossoon named O’Malley would have been counted.

    The movie was made in 2002, but the period setting was 1846 and then 1858. Bill the Butcher (Lewis) was vocal about how he hated the Irish.

    Countless films were also about this

    I don’t know how to tell you this, but this is fictional dialogue written in 2002.

    Were there ethnic tensions? Yes. Does this mean your argument, to the extent you have one, makes any sense? No.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. Truth says:
    @Hank Rearden
    Only White Men have walked on the moon. They rode on a rocket designed by a Nazi. Sour grapes much?

    No, actually no one has walked the moon, that’s all a fraud.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hank Rearden
    There is photographic evidence of White Men on the moon, taken by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). But I understand your denial of White Supremacy, or rather Aptitude granted to us by God (Evolution). It just hurts to much to think you'll never measure up.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. @Truth
    No, actually no one has walked the moon, that's all a fraud.

    There is photographic evidence of White Men on the moon, taken by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). But I understand your denial of White Supremacy, or rather Aptitude granted to us by God (Evolution). It just hurts to much to think you’ll never measure up.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Awesome Bro! Here's equally relevant photographic "evidence" of a black man on the moon. If you are old enough he was probably your idol until he pretended to kill his husband.


    https://resizing.flixster.com/dc9dlpvKWg-syCsIljY4XPLyXhA=/644x483/v1.bjs0NTQ3OTc7ajsxNzUxMDsxMjAwOzY0NDs0ODM
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. @Anon
    Restate "the point" if it can be done without throwing in random insults which seem to be the whole of the message, and then reasonable discourse can be held.

    Before we can discuss anything, get a handle first :)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    I didn't say I would be the one holding the reasonable discourse. :)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Ok, question.

    How come Fred never ever ever acknowledges that Mexico has a border fence on its southern border? If Mexico is now the definition of well adjusted workers paradise, inclusive towards all, so friendly and inviting, how come it protects its nation from outside intruders? How come its not easy to become a Mexican citizen compared to becoming a US citizen? What’s up with that?

    Also, if Mexico has greatly improved its cost of living, national IQ among workers, etc. how come they aren’t sending the US these greatly improved people? Why are they keeping their best and brightest for themselves? And, doesn’t that help make the point that Mexico isn’t sending the US their best and brightest but rather they are staying at home to help contribute to a better Mexican future?

    And if that’s true, then why exactly does the US have to take in the refuse of Mexico? Let Honduras, Guatemala or El Salvador have them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  171. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Astuteobservor II
    Before we can discuss anything, get a handle first :)

    I didn’t say I would be the one holding the reasonable discourse. :)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    hahahaaaa
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. Truth says:
    @Hank Rearden
    There is photographic evidence of White Men on the moon, taken by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). But I understand your denial of White Supremacy, or rather Aptitude granted to us by God (Evolution). It just hurts to much to think you'll never measure up.

    Awesome Bro! Here’s equally relevant photographic “evidence” of a black man on the moon. If you are old enough he was probably your idol until he pretended to kill his husband.

    https://resizing.flixster.com/dc9dlpvKWg-syCsIljY4XPLyXhA=/644×483/v1.bjs0NTQ3OTc7ajsxNzUxMDsxMjAwOzY0NDs0ODM

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Oh, regarding the idyllic paradise that is south of the border, this happened to be published lately. How could this ever be, in the safest most educated perfect paradise that is Mexico?

    Mexico Suffers Deadliest Month on Record, 2017 Set to Be Worst Year

    Noe Torres, Reuters, November 21, 2017

    There were more murders in October in Mexico than in any month over at least 20 years, according to official data, in the latest grim milestone in 2017, a year on course to register the highest homicide tally since modern records began.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  174. @Anon
    I didn't say I would be the one holding the reasonable discourse. :)

    hahahaaaa

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  175. If you bloat is true why don’t have the guts to take their country back.

    I answer my own question, they come from a corrupt culture, and want to share it with us.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  176. @Thomm

    Oh, I’ll wager Thomm never critiques La Raza (The Race.) Just Whites. Why is that?
     
    Of course I criticize them, you stupid wigger.

    The thing is, you are just as bad as they are. WNs have no more in common with successful whites (like me), than a chihuahua has with a German Shepherd.

    WNs just want to take credit for the work of others that they have nothing in common with other than shared ancestry from Europe centuries ago.

    Successful whites (like me)?

    Oh boy, we’ve got a badass here!

    Now let’s check Thomm’s logic as it changes from sentence to sentence. You say you have no more common with your fellow whites “than a chihuahua has with a German Shepherd,” and then you turn right around and posit “shared ancestry.”

    Which is it?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    We all know that Thomm is not white but he's important for the "comic relief" factor. The message is much more efficient with a talking monkey in the background. Don't you watch Disney?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. @Future Ex-Pat
    I read the cited 'study'...and it invalidates itself right in the conclusion: "The correlations between human pigmentation, aggression, and sexuality (and IQ), is further supported by the anthropological and sociological research..." Correlation is not causation. I think it would strike most anyone as absurd to exclude sociological and economic influences as they relate to incarceration rates for violent crime, than the significance of genetic composition.

    Crime statistics show that black on black crime is much more likely than black on anyone else. It's not a governmental study by a 'leading' researcher, but reading the Chicago Tribune or Baltimore Sun for a month would validate this assessment. So, do blacks in Chicago violently aggress against one another because they have more melanin, or due to other factors: limited economic opportunity? poor living conditions? a cultural/tribal need to acquire 'street cred', to move up the cultural hierarchy by out-violencing the violent? a cultural idealization (via music, TV and movies) of 'thug life' as being glamorous and desirable? failure of our educational system? simply boredom? Equal parts of all of these? Half of these reasons, plus 20 others? Honestly, I don't know, but genetics would seem to pale (no pun intended) in comparison. It strikes me as the $64,000 question, and one that society has been incapable of answering correctly, and I have serious doubts that it ever will.

    “Correlation is not causation.”

    Wrong. Now you get taken behind the ol’ woodshed for your misunderstanding of science for a bit of an intellectual spanking.

    The shortest true statement that can be made about causality and correlation is one of the following: (a) “Empirically observed covariation is a necessary but not sufficient condition for causality.” (b) “Correlation is not causation but it sure is a hint.”

    wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation

    Next time, use the shortest true statement. No more lying by omission!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Hank Rearden
    Successful whites (like me)?

    Oh boy, we've got a badass here!

    Now let's check Thomm's logic as it changes from sentence to sentence. You say you have no more common with your fellow whites "than a chihuahua has with a German Shepherd," and then you turn right around and posit "shared ancestry."

    Which is it?

    We all know that Thomm is not white but he’s important for the “comic relief” factor. The message is much more efficient with a talking monkey in the background. Don’t you watch Disney?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Fred Reed Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Not What Tom Jefferson Had in Mind
Sounds Like A Low-Ranked American University To Me
Very Long, Will Bore Hell Out Of Most People, But I Felt Like Doing It
It's Not A Job. It's An Adventure.
Cloudy, With Possible Tidal Wave