The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Fred Reed ArchiveBlogview
Jewish Decline and the Rise of China: In the US
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_178414046
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Years ago, when I was tech writer for weird magazines such as Signal and for other more-normal techish pubs, Jews littered the intellectual landscape. They were all over high-end research, such as Bell Labs. The big names were often Jewish, Einstein, von Neumann, Feynman, Gell-Mann, Minsky. The staff list for the Manhattan Project read like a Yeshiva yearbook. The same happened in the arts. Bernstein, Landowska, Rubinstein, Stoppard (“Maidens in search of Godhead…and vice versa.”)

Jews were smart, most people figured, not necessarily liking it. I wondered why without great interest. Genetic determinists of course cooked up evolutionary explanations involving undiscovered genes acted upon by unquantifiable selective pressures to produce assumed results not correlatable with the pressures. Business as usual.

Later I began to notice without thinking about it that the Jewish names were growing thin on the ground. These were not systematic observations. But Asian names were becoming prominent almost everywhere. The Feinsteins seemed to be in recession, if only anecdotally.

Something odd was happening, I barely noticed.

Then Ron Unz published The Myth of American Meritocracy, documenting a stunning turnaround of which I had been only vaguely aware. The book deals substantially with corruption in admissions to Ivy schools, with some (I think) good ideas for reform. It also charts the sharp decline in Jewish achievement and the meteoric rise of the Asians. (Actually I think falling is more what meteors do, but cliches are cliches.)

As one example, consider the NMSQT, the National Merit Scholastic Qualifying Test, given nationally to high-schoolers. To be a Semi-Finalist a student has to test in the top one half of one percent–sort of upper middle-brow intelligence.

in 2010 there were about 2000 Semi-Finalists in California, the state with the second highest Jewish population after New York. Citing an analysis of last names, Unz notes that there was only one Cohen, Levy, and Kaplan, but 49 Wangs and 36 Kims.

This pattern, Unz notes with lots of documentation, repeats across the country. For example, in the ultra-high-end high schools such as Thomas Jefferson in Virginia and Stuyvesant in New York. These places are scary smart, CalTech in short pants. Unz:

“Jews and Asians today are about equal in number within New York City but whereas a generation ago elite local public schools such as Stuyvesant were very heavily Jewish, today Jews are outnumbered at least several times over by Asians.”

“In 2012, Asians were 72.5% of Stuyvesant students, with all whites at just 24%, of whom an unspecified fraction were Jewish.”

Which is to say that even if all the whites were Jews and no HAGVACAS (House and Garden Variety (non-Jewish) Caucasians), the Asians would be outperforming the Jews by three to one.

Which is crazy strange.

ORDER IT NOW

Now the reader may say, “But Fred, this objection and that objection, and what about…?” Fair enough, but in condensing a book into three paragraphs one leaves things out. The sources are there and the analysis careful. And no, the book is not an attack on Jews, Unz himself being Jewish and a Harvard grad.

Methinks, subject to correction, that his findings shed considerable darkness on what we think we know about intelligence. Jews still perform better than Hagvacas, but less better than before, and the Asians are way ahead of the Jews. It seems unlikely that the Asians have suddenly risen in biological intelligence, or that Jews have gone down. Putting it otherwise, when one group falls almost overnight on a wide variety of tests thought to measure intelligence, and another rises, it follows that either intelligence can change very fast or the tests are not measuring intelligence. So what is happening? What do the aptitude tests measure?

The easy explanation is that the Chinese kids are of about normal intelligence but just work harder. Yet when a kid gets into Stuyvesant or MIT, he can’t get by on hard work and modest aptitude any more than I could play for the Chicago Bulls by practicing hard. You have to be smart to do, say, computational fluid dynamics. Actually really, really smart with tensors and things.

Which is why I have trouble buying the explanation offered by a Jewish friend: “We’ve lost our hunger.” I think he means that in his day there were Jewish quotas in universities and no room in the country club so when those barriers lifted the Jewish kids were going to show the goyim what was what and went at everything fang and claw and, well, showed the goyim. Then they got comfortable, moved to the suburbs, and maybe even watched football.

I have known people with very high pre-dumbing-down SATs, and Merit Semi-Finalists, and people with IQs in excess of 150. They didn’t just know stuff. They were bright. Was intrinsic intelligence raised in the Asian young by hard study?

Whatever is happening, it is grave. Consider CalTech, which probably has the highest standards for admission in the country. Further, it does not practice affirmative action. The demographics of the studentry: Black, 2%; Hispanic, 12%; White (including Jewish), 28%; Asian, 44%. This is worse than it seems at a glance because Asians are only 15% of the population of California,and six percent of the national.

Whatever is happening, it is not a statistical fluke. A couple of quotes from the book among many similar ones:

“For example, among Math Olympiad winners white Gentiles scarcely outnumbered Jews during the 1970s…but since 2000 have become over fifteen times as numerous.”

“Over forty percent of Putnam winners prior to 1950 were Jewish…but since 2000 the percentage has dropped to under ten percent, without a single likely Jewish name in the last seven years.” The Putnam is a very high-end math test.

Another of my friends has an Asian wife and thus entree into the Asian community. He quotes their (wisely private) outlook: “Whites are lazy and stupid.”

If you like succinct, you just got it.

The curious thing is that the Asians are not just way ahead of Jews, but wayer ahead of Hagvacas. The gap is huge, and seems to me too large to be explained by the few points of extra IQ sometimes attributed to East Asians.

ORDER IT NOW

The Asian rise may have consequences. It is not thought proper to notice that the white population of America, numbering very roughly two hundred million, provides nearly all of the scientific advance, engineering, and entrepreneurship. China has, again very roughly, a billion Han Chinese–you know, the kind that dominate Hagvacas and Jews in the US.

I watch Chinese technology as best I can. In fifteen years, China has gone from having no supercomputers to having slightly more than the US has, including the world’s two fastest, the most rapid of which (TaiHuiLight) is a Chinese design using Chinese semiconductors. (Obama, ever brilliant, stopped Intel from selling them chips, so they apparently decided the needed to supply their own.) The quantum-crypto line from Beijing to Shanghai, said to have been spurred by a desire to keep NSA off China’s back, is noticeably more advanced than carrier pigeons. The type 093B nukey attack sub just launched seems a major improvement over its predecessor. The 300 mph plus Shanghai Maglev trains uses foreign technology, but now they know how to do it. China is by far the world leader in high-speed rail, of which America has none.

Beijing is trying hard to advance technologically and with success With Jews going dark, and Hagvacas worried about safe spaces and microaggressions, who is going to protect America against competition by potentially five times as many engineers as we have, especially if they perform as well as our Asians do?

(Republished from Fred on Everything by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Asians, Jews, Meritocracy 
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Drakejax says:

    Isn’t the HBD assumption that all those successful Jews marrying hot gentile wives is what has driven down Jewish achievement? Although the obervation of no longer being “hungry” is also apt since Jews command such overwhelming percentages of power postions in America – similar to WASPS at the beginning of the 20th Century. Perhaps the Jews are the new WASPS, and the Asians are the new Jews? At least that was what I thought Unz was driving at.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TJM
    No moron, nice try, there is no such thing as "Jewish exceptionalism", just Jewish nepotism. Jews dominate central banking/Wall Street and use that financial ill gotten gains to insure their "tribe" gets a leg up.

    We see this most glaringly with Facebook: A few guys create facebook, but the ONE who rises above the rest to get the billions, a Jew. Not because he is smarter, or had more a hand in it, but because that is who his Zionist Jew benefactors would fund.

    See the same thing in music, movies, entertainment, if you are a Jew, you have a leg up over non Jews in the industry.

    And what has all this Jew influence given us over the past 50 years or so, bullet trains, universal health care, the best education system in the world, NOPE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! These fuckers have used their advantage to rape America of its culture, its resources, and its morals.

    Look at AIPAC, NJC, ADL, AEI, CNAC, CFR, and so many more Zionist Jew organizations that push for military spending, at the cost of our infrastructure, wars in the Middle East, at the cost of our morals, open borders, and ignorance of our population through media control.

    Maybe the Chinese can save up from this parasitic infestation!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /freed/jewish-decline-and-the-rise-of-china-in-the-us/#comment-1473895
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominque Francon Society"] says:

    Jews of Allen and Kubrick’s generation grew up in awe of Wasp preeminence when US and UK dominated the world, and Kubrick’s films are also Anglo-obsessed.
    And Steven Spielberg could be the last of the Jewish breed that grew up with Anglo-Americans as the icons of American Prowess and Manhood.

    J.J. Abrams who grew up in a Jewish-dominated America has no respect for white gentiles as he goes about filling STAR WARS sequel with a ghastly Negro as future impregnator of a white girl to produce a galactic Obama-mofo.

    In some ways, the Anglosphere is more powerful than ever with US being the sole superpower and the Americanization of EU, Latin America, and East Asia.
    American-style English language is firmly entrenched as lingua franca around the world. But even as Anglosphere grows ever more powerful, Wasps in it become less powerful. The New World Order is more like the Anglowicz Sphere.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ivy
    Please enlighten us with a list of exemplars of Jewish prowess and manhood.
    , @Bee
    JJ Abrams has no respect for white gentiles? The vast majority of his characters are white gentiles, and he lovingly depicts a small mid-American town in his film Super 8 (and that was the one that was supposed to be '''''inspired by his childhood''''').
    , @El Dato

    J.J. Abrams who grew up in a Jewish-dominated America has no respect for white gentiles as he goes about filling STAR WARS sequel with a ghastly Negro as future impregnator of a white girl to produce a galactic Obama-mofo.
     
    I will save that quote.

    Still,,. as The Immortal Mister Plinkett explained in one of his reviews (but regarding Star Wars "The Phantom Menace", as mis-directed by George Lucas):

    Why is Samuel Jackson in a Star Wars Movie?? He is there to pander to the "Urban Market" - which is to say Blacks. Well, the Urban Market once stole my video recorder...
     
  3. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:

    Fred Fred Cabbage Head, the video below say China facing big bad times.

    Could be.

    Also, smartest Chinese come to US. They don’t go back. They give their brains to US companies where they make more money.
    Also, so many Chinese girls use wombs to make babies for Jewish men like Amy Chua did.
    They are gonna grow up as Jews mostly.

    So, Jews win.

    In China, birthrate disaster looms. Not just due to one-child policy. Even if China had have-all-kids-you-want policy, a lot of women got freedom and taste of better life and will not marry any guy unless he has something to offer.

    Same problem in Japan and Korea and Taiwan and etc.

    Just like in White Europe. No matter how good capitalism and democracy may be in offering fun and material stuff, they are failures if they lead life to stop producing more life.

    In this sense, capitalism kills. Not by death camps but by empty wombs.
    Culture of me-ism makes everyone strive for Good stuff. They wont’ settle for less even if they grow old alone and die.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hbd investor
    Untrue Chinese immigration was limited due to fears of communism until Nixon opened up immigration in 1978 near the end of the cold war, this was when the high quality immigrants came in.

    Before that Chinese immigration was blocked by the Chinese exclusion act that was only removed in 1943 at the end of ww2, China immediately went red and immigration was unofficially banned.

    So the majority of Chinese Americans comprise of the descendants of rail road builders and other workers who came to the us to do manual labor or war refugees Chinese who fled from the ccp (experience taking in war refugees shows that refugees are not elite immigrants) ,

    http://globalworkers.org/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/Top%20ten%20sending%20countries%20H-1B%20workers%20by%20nonimmigrant%20petitions%20approved%20and%20admissions%20flow%202011.JPG

    The new immigrants aren't h1b either see the above chart most of the h1b are from India most of the new immigrants get to the USA by chain immigration or marriage fraud Or asylum

    Half of all asylum cases are from China


    http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/02/23/nyregion/asylum-fraud-in-chinatown-industry-of-lies.html

    More Chinese immigrants apply for asylum than any other immigrant group in the country, with the Chinese population in New York leading the way: Over the past six years, about half of all applications filed by Chinese immigrants not facing deportation were submitted in New York City.
    , @Hbd investor
    I don't think empty wombs will be a problem

    The Chinese government has absolute power, and lack of morals.

    If empty wombs are a problem the ccp would solve it immediately by offering tax cuts to the families with children and implementing pregnancy leaves along with propaganda to have more children.

    The reason why China's population exploded from 200 million at the end of ww2 to 1.4 billion was because Mao believed that ww3 was coming and they needed as many people as possible to increase their chances of winning a nuclear war.

    If the Communists could create 1.2 billion people with a snap of a finger there is no reason why they can't do it again
    , @WhatEvvs
    Well, you certainly have a lot to say about the Jews, so have you done any reading? Where is it written that the children of Jewish fathers/Chinese mothers will grow up Jewish?

    The majority of children of Jewish fathers/non-Jewish mothers do not grow up Jewish, quite apart from the fact that they are not considered Jewish by Judaic law. They just drift away. I see this everywhere, in my own family and others.

    The Jewish future is in the ultra-Orthodox.

    , @TJM
    Whenever Jews wins, the rest of us lose, hopefully the Chinese can save us from this menace.
    , @colm
    The Chinee plays the game with a 300 year horizon.

    Yea, the Chinese girls will marry Jews and other whites and bear half-Jews and half-whites.

    But the boys will be half-Chinese and will not be attractive to other white girls, so they go after Chinee girls like their moms.

    After 300 years, there will be lots of yellow-looking people with Western Surnames and the original Jewish/white blood have diluted to the level of irrelevancy.

    They did that to the nomads ruling Chinee 1500 years, to the Khitans, to the Mongols and the Manchus. After 300 years all these people become Chinee and become minorities.

    Chinee can sacrifice some men. In the longer horizon of time, it knows it will win.
  4. Gene Su says:

    It’s the Tiger Mom (and Dad) phenomenon. Let’s talk about some ways that Asians are different from other ethnicities.
    1. Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don’t go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter).
    2. Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don’t see it as a sign of low rank. Thomas Sowell has written once that the laziness of black and white southerners has to do with the view that having to do manual labor was a disgrace. I have dealt with so many Asian VPs handling their own products and sweeping their floors.
    3. Asian parents force their kids to study. My mom won’t let me out of the house until I spelled every word on the flash cards correctly.
    4. Asian parents will switch schools if they believe that their kid was not being educated. Sympathizers of blacks talk about how they are trapped in failing schools. Let’s take that as true. Why is it I don’t see the majority of blacks taking their kids out of failing schools? Only a minority, however large, will pay a private school tuition or drive across town to a charter school. Asian parents will pinch every penny to send their kids to a private school.
    5. Asian kids tend to be more introverted. Introverted nerds tend to be into science and math.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don’t go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter)."

    LOL.

    https://youtu.be/q99eI_uDDGc?t=7s


    I guess you never saw the Filos, Korons, Chiners, and other yelloid trash in LA.
    I mean they are such materialist lowlife human garbage.

    , @Priss Factor
    "Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don’t see it as a sign of low rank."

    Gene Bean Jelly Bean, you kill me.

    https://youtu.be/q99eI_uDDGc?t=7s

    You can't be serious.

    Japan is the nation that came up with 'dirty, dangerous, demeaning' work notion.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty,_dangerous_and_demeaning

    When East Asia was very poor, yelloids were willing to do any job. They had to eat. And this may be true still in many parts of China.

    But not so in Japan, S Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and Hong Kong.

    See the movie TOKYO SONATA and DEPARTURES. Both show Japan in crisis as lifetime jobs dry up. Japanese feel such shame to take on 'demeaning jobs'.
    Korea is imitation of Japan. 99% of its students get college degrees and want clean jobs. But they can't get them. So, many turn to suicide.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/03/opinion/south-koreas-struggle-with-suicide.html

    In fact, the main reason these people come to US is to find better job, not to do menial labor. In fact, they left their country to get away from menial labor that is seen as low and given to immigrants from poor Asian nations. Look at Japan, and you will see small businesses hiring people from Philippines, even from Iran. Even from ghastly Africa. Shiite.

    It used to be most immigrants from Asia were not so highly educated and spoke little English. Many people are now coming with full education and English skills. Some are anchor babies, and China is not the only nation that plays this game.

    In the end, Asian-Americans will lose for the same reason why so many white liberals and Jewish secularists are losing in the long run. As individuals, they may have had success in professions and etc.
    But an individual life lasts only several decades. Life goes on through reproduction and culture lasts through family ties and remembrance(connection from grandfather to father to son and etc).
    Jewish Americans and white Libs gained much freedom and achieved much... but so many decided not to have kids or got divorced or intermarried and forgot about culture and history. They only live for pop culture as their culture.

    Asian-Amerians are no different. It doesn't matter if so many do well in school. Many yellow girls will not have kids. Many will intermarry and have mixed-raced kids with little asian identity. Many asian men will die childless as asian manhood is seen as joke in the US and is attractive to none.

    Asians have no striking individual quality in wit, personality, charisma, athleticism, etc. Their power comes from homogeneity, unity, and numbers. They can have that in Asia, and they should stay in Asia.
    Coming to the West leads to short term individual success but no group success.

    Via immigration, Asia will just lose its best to the West. Americanized Asians into PC will just worship 'gay marriage'.
    , @Chris Mallory

    Thomas Sowell has written once that the laziness of black and white southerners has to do with the view that having to do manual labor was a disgrace.
     
    In this instance Sowell has no clue what he is talking about. I have never met a Southerner, black or white, who looked down on manual labor. But when you have temperatures in the mid to upper 90's and humidity levels in the mid 90's, sitting under the shade tree makes a whole lot of sense.
    , @Hbd investor
    >Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don’t go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter).

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2014/04/economist-explains-17

    I don't know what Asians you are referring to but the Chinese are huge consumers of luxury goods. There are rich chinese students driving 200,000+ cars on college campuses.

    It is well known that most Chinese women refuse to marry men that don't have a car, house or a certain income which is why their real estate market is so hot , Chinese materialism has been written about extensively by numerous news outlets
    , @Escher
    You're dead wrong I am afraid. Asians take great pride in having servants or others do their errands and unpleasant tasks for them.
    , @Rdm
    This is a knee jerk comment to feel good.

    1. Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don’t go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter).

    Geeezuus. Freaking lies.

    2. Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don’t see it as a sign of low rank. Thomas Sowell has written once that the laziness of black and white southerners has to do with the view that having to do manual labor was a disgrace. I have dealt with so many Asian VPs handling their own products and sweeping their floors.

    You mean Sewage VP?

    No VP will sweep their floors, you idiots. Or maybe self-employed Asian restaurant owner?

    3. Asian parents force their kids to study. My mom won’t let me out of the house until I spelled every word on the flash cards correctly.

    That's your mom. I self study and my parents didn't force me to study and yet, I stood among the Top 1%.
    , @Anonymous
    The immigrant experience is rough and it's one of those things that can probably only truly be understood by living it. It has an element of survivalism to it and if those immigrant parents believe that education is the way to make it, any hint of failure is viewed as threat to a persons survival! I've seen Mexican immigrants work themselves so hard that it's going to cut off at least 20-30 years off their lives. In Palo Alto a trend exists where Asian kids jump in front of trains to escape the pressures of high school. 1st generation East Indians, the wealthiest immigrant group in America, have told me the only thing that was acceptable in their homes growing up was reading, studying, or working. My father was forced to shave his head starting in grade school in order to have the least amount of distractions from studying (I found this out when he flipped out after I buzzed my hair short, since all he wanted growing up was a head of hair). This experience is also consistent among previous 1st generation Italians, Irish, Scotish, ect. Now it seems to be heavily an Asian phenomenon, probably due to immigration trends among educated professional classes. I have always been fascinated by the generational experiences of families and people I encounter, especially the elderly and I will sit for hours listening to their stories. I've discovered that immigrants on average, except those that experience war, by far have the hardest experiences and instill grit and discipline in a way that most American would view as borderline abusive and the antithesis to a meaningful life. Next time you have chance ask around and you will hear what I'm talking about. For me to think that I would push our kid so hard in school that they would possibly commit suicide is delusional, yet it's a phenomenon is some communities. Also IQ and hard work go hand and hand, so the more one studies the greater their IQ increases and the better and faster one becomes at learning. On the opposite side of the spectrum the spread of non-reality based beliefs, like Zionism, that has become prevalent among many in the Jewish community, like any dogma, has been in conflict to intellectualism thus creating a restraint on fact based inquiry and reality based learning. Yet there is still hope for non-immigrant Americans, finding a practical passion seems to also lead to a high level of success.
  5. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:

    “In 2010 there were about 2000 Semi-Finalists in California, the state with the second highest Jewish population after New York. Citing an analysis of last names, Unz notes that there was only one Cohen, Levy, and Kaplan, but 49 Wangs and 36 Kims.”

    Fred Fred Cabbage Head, the genetic thesis about Jewish intelligence is correct.

    I went to school with lots of Jews and some Asians in suburbs in the 80s.

    There were studious Jews and studious Asians. But generally Asians studied harder.
    But they were such grinds. Sure, some were real smart, but most were just reasonably bright who did a lot of studying and test-prepping. It was all about practice and preparation. Grind stuff.

    I recall on an individual basis, the Jewish kids were sharper, smarter, wittier. Some had brilliance, something totally missing from the yelloids.
    The Hindus are more fun, and they are in a category all their own, especially because India is nation of such extremes, with lots of very smart people and lots of very dumb people. With so much modernity and so much poverty, so much cosmopolitan experience and so much backward shitting with the cows outdoors.

    I must say of all the smart Jews and smart Asians of my high school class, the Jews did much more in life than the Asians even though some of them yelloids went to MIT, Harvard, University of Chicago.
    Look at Silicon Valley. Yelloids rarely rise above middle management. Some say Bamboo Ceiling, but it’s more like Bamboo limit. These yelloids got no spark.

    Look at music. Jews were prominent as pianists and fiddlers. And then, Asians took over many classical music stuff.
    But what does that prove? It means Asians can succeed a grind stuff. To become good at classical music, you practice, practice, and practice, like Yo Mama and Ling Lang.

    But have Asian-Americans achieved creative original stuff in music in America? Where is Asian Bob Dylan, Carole King, Philip Glass, Paul Simon, etc?
    To be sure, there may be prominent and important Asian composers in Asia, but why not here? It goes to show Jews have confidence and strong personality even when they are a minority. In contrast, Asians may have confidence when surrounded by own kind but just go along when surrounded by others.

    It’s funny. You’d think Asians would be more grindlike and conformist in Asia than in the West. I hear Asian school system is pretty rice-grueling. But because Asians are surrounded by other Asians in Asia, maybe they got some cultural confidence and have more guts to be original and individualistic, at least in creative fields.
    Consider some of the very great Japanese film makers and authors and such folks. In the West, Asians as individuals may have more freedom but they seem to lack cultural confidence. So, their individualism amounts to little more than imitating rappers, standup comics, and stuff. This is where Jews are different. Even when outnumbered by goyim, Jews just do their own stuff and break new ground.

    Comparing Jews and Asians are not fair because there are many Asian immigrants than Jewish ones. I’ll bet many of the top asian students in California are children of immigrants. But this only points to Asian weakness. Asian-American achievement depends on immigration. Why? Asian-American birthrates are lower than even white Americans. Also, with huge intermarriage rates, Asian-Americanness will fade away. There is a lot of Jewish intermarriage with goyim too, but because Jewishness has prestige, even someone who is part-Jewish may identify as Jewish. But someone who is part-Asian will likely identify with other races, not least because intermariage rates are higher with Asian women. Children naturally identify more with father who is the authority figure in the household.

    With very low birthrates in Asia and among Asian-Americans, immigration will further dry up Asian demographics and those that come here will either die childless or intermarry and their kids will become unAsian.

    Now, because China is such a huge country with so many people, it might be different for Chinese than for Japanese and Koreans.
    But China too is in demographic freefall.

    In the end, I think the world will be overrun by two peoples: Hindus and Africans. India still has lots of kids, and Indian government plans to send gazillions all over the world. African birthrate is over the top, and Europe will be Africanized(there’s no stopping it now) and US is also taking in tons of black Africans.

    Even Japan and Korea may take in the Negroes and dotters. China took in a whole bunch of Africans. Remember US just brought 300,000 blacks and they are now 50 million. The 1 million Africans in China may grow to 50 million in a century with every negress having 8 kids after gorging on dumplings and mooshoo pork.

    So, when it comes to the future, I bet on Hindus and Africans.

    Europeans are finished. Russia may be only white nation that survives.

    East Asia with their declining birthrates will be overrun with dotters and jivers, especially because the main culture of Japan and Korea and Taiwan and Philippines is black rap music and imitating American Diversity. Also, the Asian-American community of all these folks are totally Americanized and with social networking via internet, their compatriots are totally becoming Americanized even without coming here.

    I know a Filo girl who communicates via internet with friends and family back in Filo-land as if they are next door neighbors. From what I heard from her, culture in Manila is like culture in LA. Trashy and global.

    Globalism means the world turned into Hollywood and MTV. Since US is cool and since ‘diversity’ is cool, the new generation of Asians, like Europeans, will demand more immigration and more emigration. As their people move to US and Canada, their own nations will make up for people-shortage by bringing tons of dotters and jivers.

    Read More
    • Agree: Realist
    • Replies: @Hbd investor
    >But have Asian-Americans achieved creative original stuff in music in America?

    >Look at Silicon Valley. Yelloids rarely rise above middle management.

    Promotion to management is mostly based on whether or not people like you, same with success in the fields of art and music.

    Their are plenty of Asian CEOs and crwatives in Asia.

    None of these fields are meritocratic, the explanation is simple some combination of racism and cultural differences prevent Asians from succeeding socially.

    While for Jews the average non racist would not be able to tell the difference from a secular Jew and a white. And secular Jews have pretty much the same culture as whites. Most Americans wouldn't be able to tell if someone was a Jew from speaking with one because they are culturally similar ty o whites.

    >China took in a whole bunch of Africans.

    No they didn't, none of them ever gained citizenship and most of them have left already, the Africans in China number only a few thousand down from the 300,000 peak.

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/26/asia/africans-leaving-guangzhou-china/index.html

    I don't agree with your Asian decline predictions

    For China the government has basically absolute power and little morality. China's population grew from 200 million to 1.4 billion because Mao believed that China needed as many people as possible to survive a note nuclear war. If they could create 1.2 billion humans out of thin air they can do so again.

    For south Korea and Japan these countries are so crowded that people are living in closets and are being packed like sardines into the subway. Its completely different from white extinction since white women have the wealth and the living space but are instead choosing to raise dogs and cats instead of children, many Koreans and Japanese in surveys report wanting children but not being able to afford because of sky high costs of living due to population density while surveys show a lot of white women simply not wanting children

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/15/Countries_by_population_density.svg

    Asian Americans will definitely go extinct once the immigration stops because the first generations strongly adopt white liberalism

    But as long as east Asia remains racist they will remain on top.

    The iq gap between nams and Asians are just too much to gain a foothold. Along with alien social norms, and a incredibly difficult language.

    Many whites welcome 3rd world immigration because a 85 iq Hispanic or Syrian is closer to white iq of 98 than Asian is of 105.

    I suspect that most whites would reject immigrants with 65 iq if they we're visually different say they had purple skin color
    , @Rdm
    haha...

    Every time I read the Dominique comments, I laughed.

    Added with Joe Webb's, you have the Shakespeare play.

    We need these two old WASP guys here in comments, to have the comments flowing.
    , @anonymouse
    Dominique Francon Society's all horizons take sounds about right. I am an 82yo jew raised in brooklyn, and i continue to measure my self-worth. As Norman says somewhere, the questions he asks himself of someone are (1) is he stronger than I am? (2) smarter? (3) less queer? As anecdote is data, I feel justified to share my long experience. I have had some intercourse with the smarter than me crowd. I can name their names. Unfortunately, I have only known one Chinese well, an ex-neighbor, born in Malasia, educated in the US and currently employed by Apple. I conversed with him recently (he still owns the apartment) and he was in a glum mood, unhappy at work (his 3 children are growing up "without him" - his words). Aside his cultural limitations - which are huge and startling, he is smart enough to cope in the world, but he has intimations of not having full access to what is known or can be known. He is dissatisfied.

    As for the smarter than me crowd, many were jews, many were not; my sense is that Leroi Jones (later Amiri Baraka) was smarter than me. Having the top smarts is a gift of birth - assuming the gift is nurtured as the child grows up. Apparently Pres. Obama's father was gifted in the same way, although he was unable to realize his potential. The racial/cultural distribution of the gift is an interesting puzzle, but ultimately trivial. Whatever their background, the smartest like everybody else must live their lives one at a time.

    i suspect that the smartest jewish kids now feel free in the world in a way that jews of past generations and their discomfort about who and where they were in the world. This was the pressure-cooker effect on achievement. So the Asian tiger mother style of child nurture has obvious salience. We should be comforted by the reflection that the smartest are driven by the desire for the honor of men and the love of fair women in a globalized world where all the ethnicities/cultures of the smartest are subsumed in the culture of post-Renaissance Europe. So what's not to like?
    , @Anonymous
    Sad how you label eyeryone ....... a yelloid, a goyim, a Filo, a "negress having 8 kids after gorging on dumplings and mooshoo pork". The only people you don't denigrate are Jewish. My conclusion is you are one of the tribe. I guess you learned that superior attitude from your "holy" books. Hitler must have read them too.
    , @Anonymous
    Blah,Blah Blah. this comment goes out of its way to negate the basic facts of the article (somewhat hysterically ). And that is that Jewish dominance of western institutions in general and American society on particular is out and Asian ascendancy is in. And this is a welcome turn of events in my opinion.
    , @Z
    Priss factor,

    Its wrong to say indian govt will send gazillions of indians all over the world. Its actually the opposite. Indian govt is actively trying to a) Attract indians who are abroad to india and b) Trying its best to bring its population under control (the total fertility rate of india's two most populous states has fallen from 4.4,4.3 to 3.1 and 3.4 in just nine years. This is astounding. No state in the world except probably in china has recorded such a fall in TFR without emigration. All other states' TFR is less than this and some states have TFR below population replacement level. It means their population will actually shrink in the future.
  6. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:
    @Gene Su
    It's the Tiger Mom (and Dad) phenomenon. Let's talk about some ways that Asians are different from other ethnicities.
    1. Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don't go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter).
    2. Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don't see it as a sign of low rank. Thomas Sowell has written once that the laziness of black and white southerners has to do with the view that having to do manual labor was a disgrace. I have dealt with so many Asian VPs handling their own products and sweeping their floors.
    3. Asian parents force their kids to study. My mom won't let me out of the house until I spelled every word on the flash cards correctly.
    4. Asian parents will switch schools if they believe that their kid was not being educated. Sympathizers of blacks talk about how they are trapped in failing schools. Let's take that as true. Why is it I don't see the majority of blacks taking their kids out of failing schools? Only a minority, however large, will pay a private school tuition or drive across town to a charter school. Asian parents will pinch every penny to send their kids to a private school.
    5. Asian kids tend to be more introverted. Introverted nerds tend to be into science and math.

    “Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don’t go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter).”

    LOL.

    I guess you never saw the Filos, Korons, Chiners, and other yelloid trash in LA.
    I mean they are such materialist lowlife human garbage.

    Read More
    • Replies: @K.
    If I were to try to have a dialogue with someone surnamed Su, I would refrain from using such terms as "Filos", "Korons", and "Chiners". "Yelloid trash", would be another no-go. You, of course, may do as you like.
    , @Anonymous
    I think you got him there... Maybe not all your stereotype-jokes are germane but certainly AZNs cannot be accused of willingly going for the spartan life, inside a converted shipping container with hemp recycled furniture. I don't know of many train-hopping Chinese bindlestiff hobos suckling the fat of the land either. Not many Vietnamese grizzly men around. Is there anything more materialistic than a 20-y.o. Korean girl in polar vest & designer yoga pants parking her white BMW convertible at the Pinkberry or Sephora in Larchmont Village? Perhaps if some Kuwaitis and Hugo Chavez's daughter were tagging along too.
  7. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominque Francon Society"] says:
    @Gene Su
    It's the Tiger Mom (and Dad) phenomenon. Let's talk about some ways that Asians are different from other ethnicities.
    1. Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don't go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter).
    2. Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don't see it as a sign of low rank. Thomas Sowell has written once that the laziness of black and white southerners has to do with the view that having to do manual labor was a disgrace. I have dealt with so many Asian VPs handling their own products and sweeping their floors.
    3. Asian parents force their kids to study. My mom won't let me out of the house until I spelled every word on the flash cards correctly.
    4. Asian parents will switch schools if they believe that their kid was not being educated. Sympathizers of blacks talk about how they are trapped in failing schools. Let's take that as true. Why is it I don't see the majority of blacks taking their kids out of failing schools? Only a minority, however large, will pay a private school tuition or drive across town to a charter school. Asian parents will pinch every penny to send their kids to a private school.
    5. Asian kids tend to be more introverted. Introverted nerds tend to be into science and math.

    “Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don’t see it as a sign of low rank.”

    Gene Bean Jelly Bean, you kill me.

    You can’t be serious.

    Japan is the nation that came up with ‘dirty, dangerous, demeaning’ work notion.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty,_dangerous_and_demeaning

    When East Asia was very poor, yelloids were willing to do any job. They had to eat. And this may be true still in many parts of China.

    But not so in Japan, S Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and Hong Kong.

    [MORE]

    See the movie TOKYO SONATA and DEPARTURES. Both show Japan in crisis as lifetime jobs dry up. Japanese feel such shame to take on ‘demeaning jobs’.
    Korea is imitation of Japan. 99% of its students get college degrees and want clean jobs. But they can’t get them. So, many turn to suicide.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/03/opinion/south-koreas-struggle-with-suicide.html

    In fact, the main reason these people come to US is to find better job, not to do menial labor. In fact, they left their country to get away from menial labor that is seen as low and given to immigrants from poor Asian nations. Look at Japan, and you will see small businesses hiring people from Philippines, even from Iran. Even from ghastly Africa. Shiite.

    It used to be most immigrants from Asia were not so highly educated and spoke little English. Many people are now coming with full education and English skills. Some are anchor babies, and China is not the only nation that plays this game.

    In the end, Asian-Americans will lose for the same reason why so many white liberals and Jewish secularists are losing in the long run. As individuals, they may have had success in professions and etc.
    But an individual life lasts only several decades. Life goes on through reproduction and culture lasts through family ties and remembrance(connection from grandfather to father to son and etc).
    Jewish Americans and white Libs gained much freedom and achieved much… but so many decided not to have kids or got divorced or intermarried and forgot about culture and history. They only live for pop culture as their culture.

    Asian-Amerians are no different. It doesn’t matter if so many do well in school. Many yellow girls will not have kids. Many will intermarry and have mixed-raced kids with little asian identity. Many asian men will die childless as asian manhood is seen as joke in the US and is attractive to none.

    Asians have no striking individual quality in wit, personality, charisma, athleticism, etc. Their power comes from homogeneity, unity, and numbers. They can have that in Asia, and they should stay in Asia.
    Coming to the West leads to short term individual success but no group success.

    Via immigration, Asia will just lose its best to the West. Americanized Asians into PC will just worship ‘gay marriage’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark Green
    Hi DFS. Interesting observations, as always.
    , @DaveE
    Dom, Dom.... "couldn't get a date for the prom"...... yer killin' me. Let's talk about Jews in Egypt...... the last time they did any REAL work.
  8. Outside of the Orthodox, American Jews aren’t having many children. If you don’t get born in the first place its hard to win many awards.

    In the future all Jews will be Orthodox and/or Israeli.

    (Also with intermarriage having a ‘Jewish’ last name only defines your paternal ancestry.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    In the future all Jews will be Orthodox and/or Israeli.

    And that will be the end of Jewish superlatives, as the Ashkenazi go extinct or outmarry.

    The Orthodox I know are like the Amish. All their energies are devoted to family and maintenance of their traditions. You are not going to get any symphonies or bullet trains out of them.
    , @Karl
    > In the future all Jews will be Orthodox and/or Israeli

    bing fucking-o.

    The Pro Schneur League teams (eg, American Jewish Committee) are in quite the tizzy about it. Bureaucratic expense accounts are at stake, for christ's sake!!

    .It's also worth noting that China's Tech rise coincides (time-wise) quite well, with the decision to send HUNDREDS of kids to Israeli universities every year.

    The Thai chicks still have a better rate of locking down an Israeli husband.

  9. Ivy says:
    @Priss Factor
    Jews of Allen and Kubrick’s generation grew up in awe of Wasp preeminence when US and UK dominated the world, and Kubrick’s films are also Anglo-obsessed.
    And Steven Spielberg could be the last of the Jewish breed that grew up with Anglo-Americans as the icons of American Prowess and Manhood.

    J.J. Abrams who grew up in a Jewish-dominated America has no respect for white gentiles as he goes about filling STAR WARS sequel with a ghastly Negro as future impregnator of a white girl to produce a galactic Obama-mofo.

    In some ways, the Anglosphere is more powerful than ever with US being the sole superpower and the Americanization of EU, Latin America, and East Asia.
    American-style English language is firmly entrenched as lingua franca around the world. But even as Anglosphere grows ever more powerful, Wasps in it become less powerful. The New World Order is more like the Anglowicz Sphere.

    Please enlighten us with a list of exemplars of Jewish prowess and manhood.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Ron Jeremy

    Back in the 80s, a Jewish kid had a VCR and showed us one of his pa's adult videos.

    Shiite, this Jeremy fella had a meater so long that he could suck his own dick.

    , @TJM
    Jews excel where education and nepotism are most advantageous. take away access and financial backing, and lets see how the "chosen" do.
  10. K. says:
    @Priss Factor
    "Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don’t go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter)."

    LOL.

    https://youtu.be/q99eI_uDDGc?t=7s


    I guess you never saw the Filos, Korons, Chiners, and other yelloid trash in LA.
    I mean they are such materialist lowlife human garbage.

    If I were to try to have a dialogue with someone surnamed Su, I would refrain from using such terms as “Filos”, “Korons”, and “Chiners”. “Yelloid trash”, would be another no-go. You, of course, may do as you like.

    Read More
  11. Mark Green says: • Website
    @Priss Factor
    "Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don’t see it as a sign of low rank."

    Gene Bean Jelly Bean, you kill me.

    https://youtu.be/q99eI_uDDGc?t=7s

    You can't be serious.

    Japan is the nation that came up with 'dirty, dangerous, demeaning' work notion.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty,_dangerous_and_demeaning

    When East Asia was very poor, yelloids were willing to do any job. They had to eat. And this may be true still in many parts of China.

    But not so in Japan, S Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and Hong Kong.

    See the movie TOKYO SONATA and DEPARTURES. Both show Japan in crisis as lifetime jobs dry up. Japanese feel such shame to take on 'demeaning jobs'.
    Korea is imitation of Japan. 99% of its students get college degrees and want clean jobs. But they can't get them. So, many turn to suicide.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/03/opinion/south-koreas-struggle-with-suicide.html

    In fact, the main reason these people come to US is to find better job, not to do menial labor. In fact, they left their country to get away from menial labor that is seen as low and given to immigrants from poor Asian nations. Look at Japan, and you will see small businesses hiring people from Philippines, even from Iran. Even from ghastly Africa. Shiite.

    It used to be most immigrants from Asia were not so highly educated and spoke little English. Many people are now coming with full education and English skills. Some are anchor babies, and China is not the only nation that plays this game.

    In the end, Asian-Americans will lose for the same reason why so many white liberals and Jewish secularists are losing in the long run. As individuals, they may have had success in professions and etc.
    But an individual life lasts only several decades. Life goes on through reproduction and culture lasts through family ties and remembrance(connection from grandfather to father to son and etc).
    Jewish Americans and white Libs gained much freedom and achieved much... but so many decided not to have kids or got divorced or intermarried and forgot about culture and history. They only live for pop culture as their culture.

    Asian-Amerians are no different. It doesn't matter if so many do well in school. Many yellow girls will not have kids. Many will intermarry and have mixed-raced kids with little asian identity. Many asian men will die childless as asian manhood is seen as joke in the US and is attractive to none.

    Asians have no striking individual quality in wit, personality, charisma, athleticism, etc. Their power comes from homogeneity, unity, and numbers. They can have that in Asia, and they should stay in Asia.
    Coming to the West leads to short term individual success but no group success.

    Via immigration, Asia will just lose its best to the West. Americanized Asians into PC will just worship 'gay marriage'.

    Hi DFS. Interesting observations, as always.

    Read More
  12. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    Actually, I think these critiques of China's prospects are just total MSM nonsense/propaganda, much like how the old USSR used to endlessly critique America's dreadful economic problems during the 1970s and 1980s.

    Sure, all the MSM headlines endlessly tout China's terrible "economic slowdown"...except that even during this so-called "slowdown" China's per capita GDP has been increasing at roughly 10x America's rate. Here's a handy chart from one of my old articles from a few years ago you might want to consider reading especially since none of the trends have changed all that much:



    http://www.unz.com/article/chinas-rise-americas-fall/

    The real income of urban Chinese workers has been doubling every 5-10 years. It seems to me if the real income of ordinary American workers were doubling every decade, there'd be far fewer complaints about the One Percent.

    Commenters who endlessly ridicule the absurd claims of the MSM on some matters should be more cautious in blindly believing it on other matters.
  13. Realist says:

    Rich Jews are not losing their control of power centers.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TJM
    Britex would beg to differ, as well as sites such as this.

    Rich Jews have enjoyed a monopoly on information distribution, controls over capitalism, and entertainment, Music, movies, books...

    They have controlled much of what society takes in on a daily basis, and that is changing very fast.

    It is hard to anticipate where these changes will lead, but considering where Jewish control was taken us, it can ONLY be an improvement.
  14. Bee says:
    @Priss Factor
    Jews of Allen and Kubrick’s generation grew up in awe of Wasp preeminence when US and UK dominated the world, and Kubrick’s films are also Anglo-obsessed.
    And Steven Spielberg could be the last of the Jewish breed that grew up with Anglo-Americans as the icons of American Prowess and Manhood.

    J.J. Abrams who grew up in a Jewish-dominated America has no respect for white gentiles as he goes about filling STAR WARS sequel with a ghastly Negro as future impregnator of a white girl to produce a galactic Obama-mofo.

    In some ways, the Anglosphere is more powerful than ever with US being the sole superpower and the Americanization of EU, Latin America, and East Asia.
    American-style English language is firmly entrenched as lingua franca around the world. But even as Anglosphere grows ever more powerful, Wasps in it become less powerful. The New World Order is more like the Anglowicz Sphere.

    JJ Abrams has no respect for white gentiles? The vast majority of his characters are white gentiles, and he lovingly depicts a small mid-American town in his film Super 8 (and that was the one that was supposed to be ””’inspired by his childhood””’).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    He wants Kunta Kinte to screw the white girl in Star Schwarz.
    , @Anonymous
    Jew Jew Abrahms nostalgia for America that never was
  15. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Priss Factor
    "Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don’t go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter)."

    LOL.

    https://youtu.be/q99eI_uDDGc?t=7s


    I guess you never saw the Filos, Korons, Chiners, and other yelloid trash in LA.
    I mean they are such materialist lowlife human garbage.

    I think you got him there… Maybe not all your stereotype-jokes are germane but certainly AZNs cannot be accused of willingly going for the spartan life, inside a converted shipping container with hemp recycled furniture. I don’t know of many train-hopping Chinese bindlestiff hobos suckling the fat of the land either. Not many Vietnamese grizzly men around. Is there anything more materialistic than a 20-y.o. Korean girl in polar vest & designer yoga pants parking her white BMW convertible at the Pinkberry or Sephora in Larchmont Village? Perhaps if some Kuwaitis and Hugo Chavez’s daughter were tagging along too.

    Read More
  16. @Gene Su
    It's the Tiger Mom (and Dad) phenomenon. Let's talk about some ways that Asians are different from other ethnicities.
    1. Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don't go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter).
    2. Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don't see it as a sign of low rank. Thomas Sowell has written once that the laziness of black and white southerners has to do with the view that having to do manual labor was a disgrace. I have dealt with so many Asian VPs handling their own products and sweeping their floors.
    3. Asian parents force their kids to study. My mom won't let me out of the house until I spelled every word on the flash cards correctly.
    4. Asian parents will switch schools if they believe that their kid was not being educated. Sympathizers of blacks talk about how they are trapped in failing schools. Let's take that as true. Why is it I don't see the majority of blacks taking their kids out of failing schools? Only a minority, however large, will pay a private school tuition or drive across town to a charter school. Asian parents will pinch every penny to send their kids to a private school.
    5. Asian kids tend to be more introverted. Introverted nerds tend to be into science and math.

    Thomas Sowell has written once that the laziness of black and white southerners has to do with the view that having to do manual labor was a disgrace.

    In this instance Sowell has no clue what he is talking about. I have never met a Southerner, black or white, who looked down on manual labor. But when you have temperatures in the mid to upper 90′s and humidity levels in the mid 90′s, sitting under the shade tree makes a whole lot of sense.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    Yes,strange comment.What else do they have down south to do but manual labor?It's not a hotbed of wall street,banksters or lawyerdom pencil pushing.
  17. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Asians are still very very far from competing with Jews

    in calling the ‘Elites’ ‘To Arms’ because ‘It’s Time To Rise Up Against The Ignorant Masses’ with the intensity of hatred of one and several thousands James Traubs.

    in founding and running things like the Southern Poverty LC which “fight hate” opposing to it a much stronger and higher quality and quantity of hate, in choosing where the next war will be waged: we didn’t have Asians in the Ukraine, in those eventful days where the country’s new government needed be chosen; we don’t even have 4 Asians in the Supreme Court yet.

    in the sports of white-spitting and anti-white racism inciting — today’s America’s #1 sport, practiced in any Tv programs, in nearly every page of thw NYT’s and WaPo’s, and at a lower level in ordinary social media posting, disproving the anti-Semitic stereotype that Jews aren’t good at sports.

    In feeling a divine call to determine the destiny of the remaining 98% of peoples, starting from the political life and election, healing the voter’s mind when they may vote or have just voted wrong.

    They also seem to have no complexes of superiority, or at least to lack the dedication to making sure that everybody else understands how superior they are.

    You see, Asians are still way behind other groups, when it comes to achievement.
    ———————-
    I also want to suggest you, Mr. Reed, that you think of your worship of intelligence a bit.

    Intelligence is a human faculty that harms both when lacking and when in excess.
    Excessive intelligence is going to transform humans into blends of human and machine, many already live in symbiosis with their electronic devices, absorbed by these.

    I see that, like “beauties” obsess over intelligence and spend their life taking pictures of themselves (now that taking pictures is a cost-less activity), some very intelligent people see intelligence at the centre of the universe and being. It’s as wrong as that.

    Sympathy for the pain of every living being, and a wish for peace, should be at the centre of the human mind’s landscape, maybe?

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    The best baseball pitcher I ever saw,for 6? years,was Sandy Koufax.And I say that as a Yankee fan.He killed us in 63.
    Yes they can play sports,just not a lot of them historically.But with the rising salaries,many Jews do play sports today,its lucrative,more so then doctoring or lawyering in most cases.
  18. This is pretty significant but is rarely mentioned but the 6% of the Asian population is not performing uniformally

    Only Chinese Indians and Koreans and some viets (I would suspect that most of the viets that do well are from north Vietnam) are doing well

    asians from non indian south asians, Middle east, central Asia, Pacific islanders and south east Asians aren’t the ones going to schools like caltech and mit.

    This means that the Asians that do well probably all come from 2% of the USA population

    Thankfully I got my long positions in south Korea and China early.

    Read More
  19. Do we know little about intelligence?

    Our concept of intelligence mirrors quite well the workings and skills of one part of the human brain, I think, while the rest of it is still to be understood (and can hardly be understood by intelligence alone, perhaps).

    Bach’s and Beethoven’s IQ is estimated to have been more or less 160.
    There are probably some thousand people, in the East, with a 160 or higher IQ, and none of them is going to compose what Bach and Beethoven did: not because we don’t understand something about intelligence, but because that takes some skill that is not intelligence (while it still lies in the brain).

    A serious IQ test may predict a lot of things of an individual’s possible achievements.
    It can tell what the ceiling of that person’s achievement is: the best that he or she can do.

    Intelligence is the raw ability of the mind in analytical / functional processing, the most important when it comes to concrete achievements, and anything related with science, but, particularly, technic.

    Non-technic science also needs phantasy, imagination, if we think of very very high level, and that’s why as soon as you move out of the line of engineering and technology the white people — including a group of white people who absolutely don’t want to know they are a group of white people, id est, the Ashkenazi — outdo Asians.

    The 21th century will be the century of technic; it may well be an Asian century.

    You say: “Another of my friends has an Asian wife and thus entree into the Asian community. He quotes their (wisely private) outlook: “Whites are lazy and stupid.”

    If you like succinct, you just got it.”

    Asians very often express admiration for white civilization and cultural achievements. I often speak with many of them, and know it for a fact. Xi Jin Ping’s daughter is studying or has studied at Harvard.
    A lot of middle-class Chinese dream of having their offspring study in American university.
    I personally think they are more humble than it is reasonable to, and should get rid of this kind of complex of inferiority, realizing that today already, or anyway very soon, the best places in the world to study will be in the East and not the USA.

    Regardless, they can’t help wondering why, despite what IQ tests say, about 98% of inventions, artistic creations, and philosophies in the human story have come from the white people (including the whites who hate to know they are whites too).

    So, well, you wished to quote somebody as saying what you felt the need for saying, that whites are “lazy and stupid”, and you found someone you could quote.

    Humans are made “lady and stupid” by ease and comfort: the Asian are going to be changed by that, too, in the middle-long run; the Jews are already being changed by that as well.
    I fully subscribe to the “hunger” theory. Hunger accounts for half of what it takes to achieve, the other half being skills.
    One can’t do without skills, but, likewise, one can’t do without “hunger.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @pink_point
    Also, why do you say "Whatever is happening, it is grave?".

    You have tirelessly celebrated Jewish predominance and you are readying yourself to mourn a possible Asian predominance?

    What would the rationale for this difference in outlook be?

    "With Jews going dark, and Hagvacas worried about safe spaces and microaggressions"

    Do whites care about politically correct progressivist junk more than white Jews?
    It doesn't look so.

    , @Realist
    "Bach’s and Beethoven’s IQ is estimated to have been more or less 160."

    IQ estimates are worthless.
  20. @Priss Factor
    Fred Fred Cabbage Head, the video below say China facing big bad times.

    Could be.

    Also, smartest Chinese come to US. They don't go back. They give their brains to US companies where they make more money.
    Also, so many Chinese girls use wombs to make babies for Jewish men like Amy Chua did.
    They are gonna grow up as Jews mostly.

    So, Jews win.

    In China, birthrate disaster looms. Not just due to one-child policy. Even if China had have-all-kids-you-want policy, a lot of women got freedom and taste of better life and will not marry any guy unless he has something to offer.

    Same problem in Japan and Korea and Taiwan and etc.

    Just like in White Europe. No matter how good capitalism and democracy may be in offering fun and material stuff, they are failures if they lead life to stop producing more life.

    In this sense, capitalism kills. Not by death camps but by empty wombs.
    Culture of me-ism makes everyone strive for Good stuff. They wont' settle for less even if they grow old alone and die.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t487ILVf87k

    Untrue Chinese immigration was limited due to fears of communism until Nixon opened up immigration in 1978 near the end of the cold war, this was when the high quality immigrants came in.

    Before that Chinese immigration was blocked by the Chinese exclusion act that was only removed in 1943 at the end of ww2, China immediately went red and immigration was unofficially banned.

    So the majority of Chinese Americans comprise of the descendants of rail road builders and other workers who came to the us to do manual labor or war refugees Chinese who fled from the ccp (experience taking in war refugees shows that refugees are not elite immigrants) ,

    The new immigrants aren’t h1b either see the above chart most of the h1b are from India most of the new immigrants get to the USA by chain immigration or marriage fraud Or asylum

    Half of all asylum cases are from China

    http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/02/23/nyregion/asylum-fraud-in-chinatown-industry-of-lies.html

    More Chinese immigrants apply for asylum than any other immigrant group in the country, with the Chinese population in New York leading the way: Over the past six years, about half of all applications filed by Chinese immigrants not facing deportation were submitted in New York City.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randall Parker
    Er, Jimmy Carter was POTUS in 1978. Richard Nixon resigned August 9, 1974.
  21. @pink_point
    Do we know little about intelligence?

    Our concept of intelligence mirrors quite well the workings and skills of one part of the human brain, I think, while the rest of it is still to be understood (and can hardly be understood by intelligence alone, perhaps).

    Bach's and Beethoven's IQ is estimated to have been more or less 160.
    There are probably some thousand people, in the East, with a 160 or higher IQ, and none of them is going to compose what Bach and Beethoven did: not because we don't understand something about intelligence, but because that takes some skill that is not intelligence (while it still lies in the brain).

    A serious IQ test may predict a lot of things of an individual's possible achievements.
    It can tell what the ceiling of that person's achievement is: the best that he or she can do.

    Intelligence is the raw ability of the mind in analytical / functional processing, the most important when it comes to concrete achievements, and anything related with science, but, particularly, technic.

    Non-technic science also needs phantasy, imagination, if we think of very very high level, and that's why as soon as you move out of the line of engineering and technology the white people — including a group of white people who absolutely don't want to know they are a group of white people, id est, the Ashkenazi — outdo Asians.

    The 21th century will be the century of technic; it may well be an Asian century.

    You say: "Another of my friends has an Asian wife and thus entree into the Asian community. He quotes their (wisely private) outlook: “Whites are lazy and stupid.”

    If you like succinct, you just got it."

    Asians very often express admiration for white civilization and cultural achievements. I often speak with many of them, and know it for a fact. Xi Jin Ping's daughter is studying or has studied at Harvard.
    A lot of middle-class Chinese dream of having their offspring study in American university.
    I personally think they are more humble than it is reasonable to, and should get rid of this kind of complex of inferiority, realizing that today already, or anyway very soon, the best places in the world to study will be in the East and not the USA.

    Regardless, they can't help wondering why, despite what IQ tests say, about 98% of inventions, artistic creations, and philosophies in the human story have come from the white people (including the whites who hate to know they are whites too).

    So, well, you wished to quote somebody as saying what you felt the need for saying, that whites are "lazy and stupid", and you found someone you could quote.

    Humans are made "lady and stupid" by ease and comfort: the Asian are going to be changed by that, too, in the middle-long run; the Jews are already being changed by that as well.
    I fully subscribe to the "hunger" theory. Hunger accounts for half of what it takes to achieve, the other half being skills.
    One can't do without skills, but, likewise, one can't do without "hunger."

    Also, why do you say “Whatever is happening, it is grave?”.

    You have tirelessly celebrated Jewish predominance and you are readying yourself to mourn a possible Asian predominance?

    What would the rationale for this difference in outlook be?

    “With Jews going dark, and Hagvacas worried about safe spaces and microaggressions”

    Do whites care about politically correct progressivist junk more than white Jews?
    It doesn’t look so.

    Read More
  22. @anony-mouse
    Outside of the Orthodox, American Jews aren't having many children. If you don't get born in the first place its hard to win many awards.

    In the future all Jews will be Orthodox and/or Israeli.

    (Also with intermarriage having a 'Jewish' last name only defines your paternal ancestry.)

    In the future all Jews will be Orthodox and/or Israeli.

    And that will be the end of Jewish superlatives, as the Ashkenazi go extinct or outmarry.

    The Orthodox I know are like the Amish. All their energies are devoted to family and maintenance of their traditions. You are not going to get any symphonies or bullet trains out of them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
    I have worked at an Orthodox Jewish university. They don't have as much money as Reform Jews, but they're on average quite smart and the best students could match the best at any university. The Orthodox have 3.3 children per woman and will be the last Jews left standing in 100 years. I don't think symphonies or bullet trains, but a lot of high-intellectual-content IT work will originate with them.

    They are a delight to work with, especially the young women: smart, polite, hard-working.
    , @Corvinus
    "The Orthodox I know are like the Amish. All their energies are devoted to family and maintenance of their traditions. You are not going to get any symphonies or bullet trains out of them."

    Speaking in absolutes is a sign of a fool.
  23. @Priss Factor
    Fred Fred Cabbage Head, the video below say China facing big bad times.

    Could be.

    Also, smartest Chinese come to US. They don't go back. They give their brains to US companies where they make more money.
    Also, so many Chinese girls use wombs to make babies for Jewish men like Amy Chua did.
    They are gonna grow up as Jews mostly.

    So, Jews win.

    In China, birthrate disaster looms. Not just due to one-child policy. Even if China had have-all-kids-you-want policy, a lot of women got freedom and taste of better life and will not marry any guy unless he has something to offer.

    Same problem in Japan and Korea and Taiwan and etc.

    Just like in White Europe. No matter how good capitalism and democracy may be in offering fun and material stuff, they are failures if they lead life to stop producing more life.

    In this sense, capitalism kills. Not by death camps but by empty wombs.
    Culture of me-ism makes everyone strive for Good stuff. They wont' settle for less even if they grow old alone and die.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t487ILVf87k

    I don’t think empty wombs will be a problem

    The Chinese government has absolute power, and lack of morals.

    If empty wombs are a problem the ccp would solve it immediately by offering tax cuts to the families with children and implementing pregnancy leaves along with propaganda to have more children.

    The reason why China’s population exploded from 200 million at the end of ww2 to 1.4 billion was because Mao believed that ww3 was coming and they needed as many people as possible to increase their chances of winning a nuclear war.

    If the Communists could create 1.2 billion people with a snap of a finger there is no reason why they can’t do it again

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha

    If the Communists could create 1.2 billion people with a snap of a finger there is no reason why they can’t do it again
     
    Perhaps, but those were a different Chinese of a different time; rural, traditional, family-oriented.

    Do those same sentiments exist to the same degree in this generation? Are (post)modern city-dwelling (materialist, as you mentioned) Chinese the inheritors of that legacy?

    Just some thoughts.

    Peace.

    , @Historian

    The reason why China’s population exploded from 200 million at the end of ww2 to 1.4 billion was because Mao believed that ww3 was coming and they needed as many people as possible to increase their chances of winning a nuclear war.

    If the Communists could create 1.2 billion people with a snap of a finger there is no reason why they can’t do it again

     

    The population of China at the end of World War II was over 500 million, although nobody knew this at the time. When the Communists took their first census, they were surprised to discover that they ruled 583 million people.

    The population had just cracked 1 billion when the one-child policy was put into place.

    That's an increase of 400 million, not 1.2 billion.
    , @5371
    Nope. China's population was about 500 million at the end of WW2, and it grew rapidly due not to a rise in the birth rate but to a rapid improvement in public health
    , @Lot

    If empty wombs are a problem the ccp would solve it immediately by offering tax cuts to the families with children and implementing pregnancy leaves along with propaganda to have more children.
     
    Has not worked in Han-majority Singapore. Tax cuts won't work, taxes in China are not that high, and the country is still poor even no taxes would still mean their incomes are far below ultra low-fertility Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Singapore.

    Demographic momentum and dependency ratio is also very bad for China.
    , @dahoit
    Chinese lack of morals?Please elucidate the rest of us on that claim.
    Our jails are filled with them right?Serial liars all,huh?sheesh.
    Mao was the one who started the one child policy,didn't he?And I'm sure he had the smarts to know nobody wins a nuclear war.
    Mao was the giant of Chinese history who rescued his nation from imperialism.
    Wo his influence,they'd still be in the boxer rebellion under mandarins fighting invasion.
  24. Borachio says:

    “Lost hunger” is part of the explanation. More significant is that non-Orthodox Jews have been infected by political correctness and all its attendant ills:

    * Achievement is suspect because it makes blacks and Hispanics look bad.

    * Feelings are more important than facts.

    * Logic is an oppressive tool of The Patriarchy.

    * Childhood is for zem figuring out what sex zey are.

    May God bless and protect Orientals (Chinese and Japanese; “Asian” is P.C. bullsh*t).

    Now that we in the West are flushing our civilization down the toilet, they’re humanity’s best hope for preserving some kind of intelligent life on earth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @gwynedd1
    The West seems increasingly more likely to serve as an example of what not to do for Eastern Europe, China and Japan. I hope it is remembered well after it provides its last gift.
  25. @Gene Su
    It's the Tiger Mom (and Dad) phenomenon. Let's talk about some ways that Asians are different from other ethnicities.
    1. Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don't go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter).
    2. Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don't see it as a sign of low rank. Thomas Sowell has written once that the laziness of black and white southerners has to do with the view that having to do manual labor was a disgrace. I have dealt with so many Asian VPs handling their own products and sweeping their floors.
    3. Asian parents force their kids to study. My mom won't let me out of the house until I spelled every word on the flash cards correctly.
    4. Asian parents will switch schools if they believe that their kid was not being educated. Sympathizers of blacks talk about how they are trapped in failing schools. Let's take that as true. Why is it I don't see the majority of blacks taking their kids out of failing schools? Only a minority, however large, will pay a private school tuition or drive across town to a charter school. Asian parents will pinch every penny to send their kids to a private school.
    5. Asian kids tend to be more introverted. Introverted nerds tend to be into science and math.

    >Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don’t go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter).

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2014/04/economist-explains-17

    I don’t know what Asians you are referring to but the Chinese are huge consumers of luxury goods. There are rich chinese students driving 200,000+ cars on college campuses.

    It is well known that most Chinese women refuse to marry men that don’t have a car, house or a certain income which is why their real estate market is so hot , Chinese materialism has been written about extensively by numerous news outlets

    Read More
  26. Renoman says:

    Hey Fred, what’s a Hagvaca? Google doesn’t know.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Unzerker
    House and Garden Variety (non-Jewish) Caucasians

    It's explained in the text, the first time it's mentioned.
  27. @Priss Factor
    "In 2010 there were about 2000 Semi-Finalists in California, the state with the second highest Jewish population after New York. Citing an analysis of last names, Unz notes that there was only one Cohen, Levy, and Kaplan, but 49 Wangs and 36 Kims."

    Fred Fred Cabbage Head, the genetic thesis about Jewish intelligence is correct.

    I went to school with lots of Jews and some Asians in suburbs in the 80s.

    There were studious Jews and studious Asians. But generally Asians studied harder.
    But they were such grinds. Sure, some were real smart, but most were just reasonably bright who did a lot of studying and test-prepping. It was all about practice and preparation. Grind stuff.

    I recall on an individual basis, the Jewish kids were sharper, smarter, wittier. Some had brilliance, something totally missing from the yelloids.
    The Hindus are more fun, and they are in a category all their own, especially because India is nation of such extremes, with lots of very smart people and lots of very dumb people. With so much modernity and so much poverty, so much cosmopolitan experience and so much backward shitting with the cows outdoors.

    I must say of all the smart Jews and smart Asians of my high school class, the Jews did much more in life than the Asians even though some of them yelloids went to MIT, Harvard, University of Chicago.
    Look at Silicon Valley. Yelloids rarely rise above middle management. Some say Bamboo Ceiling, but it's more like Bamboo limit. These yelloids got no spark.

    Look at music. Jews were prominent as pianists and fiddlers. And then, Asians took over many classical music stuff.
    But what does that prove? It means Asians can succeed a grind stuff. To become good at classical music, you practice, practice, and practice, like Yo Mama and Ling Lang.

    But have Asian-Americans achieved creative original stuff in music in America? Where is Asian Bob Dylan, Carole King, Philip Glass, Paul Simon, etc?
    To be sure, there may be prominent and important Asian composers in Asia, but why not here? It goes to show Jews have confidence and strong personality even when they are a minority. In contrast, Asians may have confidence when surrounded by own kind but just go along when surrounded by others.

    It's funny. You'd think Asians would be more grindlike and conformist in Asia than in the West. I hear Asian school system is pretty rice-grueling. But because Asians are surrounded by other Asians in Asia, maybe they got some cultural confidence and have more guts to be original and individualistic, at least in creative fields.
    Consider some of the very great Japanese film makers and authors and such folks. In the West, Asians as individuals may have more freedom but they seem to lack cultural confidence. So, their individualism amounts to little more than imitating rappers, standup comics, and stuff. This is where Jews are different. Even when outnumbered by goyim, Jews just do their own stuff and break new ground.

    Comparing Jews and Asians are not fair because there are many Asian immigrants than Jewish ones. I'll bet many of the top asian students in California are children of immigrants. But this only points to Asian weakness. Asian-American achievement depends on immigration. Why? Asian-American birthrates are lower than even white Americans. Also, with huge intermarriage rates, Asian-Americanness will fade away. There is a lot of Jewish intermarriage with goyim too, but because Jewishness has prestige, even someone who is part-Jewish may identify as Jewish. But someone who is part-Asian will likely identify with other races, not least because intermariage rates are higher with Asian women. Children naturally identify more with father who is the authority figure in the household.

    With very low birthrates in Asia and among Asian-Americans, immigration will further dry up Asian demographics and those that come here will either die childless or intermarry and their kids will become unAsian.

    Now, because China is such a huge country with so many people, it might be different for Chinese than for Japanese and Koreans.
    But China too is in demographic freefall.

    In the end, I think the world will be overrun by two peoples: Hindus and Africans. India still has lots of kids, and Indian government plans to send gazillions all over the world. African birthrate is over the top, and Europe will be Africanized(there's no stopping it now) and US is also taking in tons of black Africans.

    Even Japan and Korea may take in the Negroes and dotters. China took in a whole bunch of Africans. Remember US just brought 300,000 blacks and they are now 50 million. The 1 million Africans in China may grow to 50 million in a century with every negress having 8 kids after gorging on dumplings and mooshoo pork.

    So, when it comes to the future, I bet on Hindus and Africans.

    Europeans are finished. Russia may be only white nation that survives.

    East Asia with their declining birthrates will be overrun with dotters and jivers, especially because the main culture of Japan and Korea and Taiwan and Philippines is black rap music and imitating American Diversity. Also, the Asian-American community of all these folks are totally Americanized and with social networking via internet, their compatriots are totally becoming Americanized even without coming here.

    I know a Filo girl who communicates via internet with friends and family back in Filo-land as if they are next door neighbors. From what I heard from her, culture in Manila is like culture in LA. Trashy and global.

    Globalism means the world turned into Hollywood and MTV. Since US is cool and since 'diversity' is cool, the new generation of Asians, like Europeans, will demand more immigration and more emigration. As their people move to US and Canada, their own nations will make up for people-shortage by bringing tons of dotters and jivers.

    >But have Asian-Americans achieved creative original stuff in music in America?

    >Look at Silicon Valley. Yelloids rarely rise above middle management.

    Promotion to management is mostly based on whether or not people like you, same with success in the fields of art and music.

    Their are plenty of Asian CEOs and crwatives in Asia.

    None of these fields are meritocratic, the explanation is simple some combination of racism and cultural differences prevent Asians from succeeding socially.

    While for Jews the average non racist would not be able to tell the difference from a secular Jew and a white. And secular Jews have pretty much the same culture as whites. Most Americans wouldn’t be able to tell if someone was a Jew from speaking with one because they are culturally similar ty o whites.

    >China took in a whole bunch of Africans.

    No they didn’t, none of them ever gained citizenship and most of them have left already, the Africans in China number only a few thousand down from the 300,000 peak.

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/26/asia/africans-leaving-guangzhou-china/index.html

    I don’t agree with your Asian decline predictions

    For China the government has basically absolute power and little morality. China’s population grew from 200 million to 1.4 billion because Mao believed that China needed as many people as possible to survive a note nuclear war. If they could create 1.2 billion humans out of thin air they can do so again.

    For south Korea and Japan these countries are so crowded that people are living in closets and are being packed like sardines into the subway. Its completely different from white extinction since white women have the wealth and the living space but are instead choosing to raise dogs and cats instead of children, many Koreans and Japanese in surveys report wanting children but not being able to afford because of sky high costs of living due to population density while surveys show a lot of white women simply not wanting children

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/15/Countries_by_population_density.svg

    Asian Americans will definitely go extinct once the immigration stops because the first generations strongly adopt white liberalism

    But as long as east Asia remains racist they will remain on top.

    The iq gap between nams and Asians are just too much to gain a foothold. Along with alien social norms, and a incredibly difficult language.

    Many whites welcome 3rd world immigration because a 85 iq Hispanic or Syrian is closer to white iq of 98 than Asian is of 105.

    I suspect that most whites would reject immigrants with 65 iq if they we’re visually different say they had purple skin color

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "No they didn’t, none of them ever gained citizenship and most of them have left already, the Africans in China number only a few thousand down from the 300,000 peak."

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/26/asia/africans-leaving-guangzhou-china/index.html

    No, the article says 100s or 1000s exited. So, it means 100,000s are still around in China.
    , @Erik L
    > Many whites welcome 3rd world immigration because a 85 iq Hispanic
    > or Syrian is closer to white iq of 98 than Asian is of 105.

    Having a tough time with the arithmatic today?
  28. Talha says:
    @Hbd investor
    I don't think empty wombs will be a problem

    The Chinese government has absolute power, and lack of morals.

    If empty wombs are a problem the ccp would solve it immediately by offering tax cuts to the families with children and implementing pregnancy leaves along with propaganda to have more children.

    The reason why China's population exploded from 200 million at the end of ww2 to 1.4 billion was because Mao believed that ww3 was coming and they needed as many people as possible to increase their chances of winning a nuclear war.

    If the Communists could create 1.2 billion people with a snap of a finger there is no reason why they can't do it again

    If the Communists could create 1.2 billion people with a snap of a finger there is no reason why they can’t do it again

    Perhaps, but those were a different Chinese of a different time; rural, traditional, family-oriented.

    Do those same sentiments exist to the same degree in this generation? Are (post)modern city-dwelling (materialist, as you mentioned) Chinese the inheritors of that legacy?

    Just some thoughts.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hbd investor
    While the will may not be there, the government has near absolute power.

    They can produce and implement as much propaganda and economic incentive as they want.

    They have done things thought to be impossible in the west like banning Islam

    They managed to implement a one child policy something that would be impossible to pass in a democratic country.

    China has demonstrated the ability to control human behavior

    If they could pass a one child policy? Why can't they pass economic incentives to have children.

    If you offered white women free daycare, schools free from violence and extra money, affordable housing you will get a baby boom.

    The fact is that European population is at a all time high, and this has led to skyrocketing living costs. If you look at the areas with low living costs all the whites there have a house with 5 bedrooms 2 bathrooms, a garage and driveway and a dog or cat but most important they tend to have 2 or more kids
  29. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:
    @Hbd investor
    >But have Asian-Americans achieved creative original stuff in music in America?

    >Look at Silicon Valley. Yelloids rarely rise above middle management.

    Promotion to management is mostly based on whether or not people like you, same with success in the fields of art and music.

    Their are plenty of Asian CEOs and crwatives in Asia.

    None of these fields are meritocratic, the explanation is simple some combination of racism and cultural differences prevent Asians from succeeding socially.

    While for Jews the average non racist would not be able to tell the difference from a secular Jew and a white. And secular Jews have pretty much the same culture as whites. Most Americans wouldn't be able to tell if someone was a Jew from speaking with one because they are culturally similar ty o whites.

    >China took in a whole bunch of Africans.

    No they didn't, none of them ever gained citizenship and most of them have left already, the Africans in China number only a few thousand down from the 300,000 peak.

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/26/asia/africans-leaving-guangzhou-china/index.html

    I don't agree with your Asian decline predictions

    For China the government has basically absolute power and little morality. China's population grew from 200 million to 1.4 billion because Mao believed that China needed as many people as possible to survive a note nuclear war. If they could create 1.2 billion humans out of thin air they can do so again.

    For south Korea and Japan these countries are so crowded that people are living in closets and are being packed like sardines into the subway. Its completely different from white extinction since white women have the wealth and the living space but are instead choosing to raise dogs and cats instead of children, many Koreans and Japanese in surveys report wanting children but not being able to afford because of sky high costs of living due to population density while surveys show a lot of white women simply not wanting children

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/15/Countries_by_population_density.svg

    Asian Americans will definitely go extinct once the immigration stops because the first generations strongly adopt white liberalism

    But as long as east Asia remains racist they will remain on top.

    The iq gap between nams and Asians are just too much to gain a foothold. Along with alien social norms, and a incredibly difficult language.

    Many whites welcome 3rd world immigration because a 85 iq Hispanic or Syrian is closer to white iq of 98 than Asian is of 105.

    I suspect that most whites would reject immigrants with 65 iq if they we're visually different say they had purple skin color

    “No they didn’t, none of them ever gained citizenship and most of them have left already, the Africans in China number only a few thousand down from the 300,000 peak.”

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/26/asia/africans-leaving-guangzhou-china/index.html

    No, the article says 100s or 1000s exited. So, it means 100,000s are still around in China.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hbd investor
    The number of illegal Africans are difficult to count but the trend is that none of them are getting citizenship they are getting rounded up and sent back to their own countries. The Africans while in China experience extreme discrimination and racism. The Africans taking over China is never going to happen.

    The leaders of China might be redpilled.

    http://www.parapundit.com/archives/010066.html

    They are attempting to purge what little pc culture is present in China. See above , I strongly doubt that China will go down the native population genocide path caused by pc culture like the west
    , @Duke of Qin
    There aren't hundreds of thousands of Africans in all of China, let alone Guangzhou. All of the huge population estimates reported in the Western press are from the usual not-so-useful idiots intent on inflating the numbers to inflate black political power as they do in the West whose ridiculous sources are from black so-called "academics" eyeballing the number of blacks.. The number of actual semi permanent (6 months or longer) Africans in Guangzhou is only 4000. At any given day, the total floating population of Africans in Guangzhou is 16000. Keep in mind that Chinese use the geographic definition of Africa so this also includes Egyptians (the second largest "African" population in China) and other North African Arabs. The city of Guangzhou basically accounts for nearly 1/5 foreign residents in China with Beijing and Shanghai accounting for probably much of the remainder. You will find basically zero Africans in China outside of these major metropolitan areas with the remainders elsewhere primarily white backpackers, tourists, and twenty something English teachers and vagabonds.

    White liberals have the mistaken impression that Chinese immigration policing is as dysfunctional as their own when estimating the number of illegals. Random on the spot passport checks, arrests, and deportations of Africans are all things the Chinese are perfectly capable of and are doing. The biggest enabler of illegal immigration in China and elsewhere, business elites, have zero incentive or willingness to protect African illegals simply because they aren't willing to employ them and know they can't get much productive work out of them. Which is why the largest numbers of foreign illegals are Vietnamese who are smuggled into the manufacturing hub in the Pearl River Delta to offset rising local wages.
  30. @Talha

    If the Communists could create 1.2 billion people with a snap of a finger there is no reason why they can’t do it again
     
    Perhaps, but those were a different Chinese of a different time; rural, traditional, family-oriented.

    Do those same sentiments exist to the same degree in this generation? Are (post)modern city-dwelling (materialist, as you mentioned) Chinese the inheritors of that legacy?

    Just some thoughts.

    Peace.

    While the will may not be there, the government has near absolute power.

    They can produce and implement as much propaganda and economic incentive as they want.

    They have done things thought to be impossible in the west like banning Islam

    They managed to implement a one child policy something that would be impossible to pass in a democratic country.

    China has demonstrated the ability to control human behavior

    If they could pass a one child policy? Why can’t they pass economic incentives to have children.

    If you offered white women free daycare, schools free from violence and extra money, affordable housing you will get a baby boom.

    The fact is that European population is at a all time high, and this has led to skyrocketing living costs. If you look at the areas with low living costs all the whites there have a house with 5 bedrooms 2 bathrooms, a garage and driveway and a dog or cat but most important they tend to have 2 or more kids

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ron Unz

    They can produce and implement as much propaganda and economic incentive as they want...They managed to implement a one child policy something that would be impossible to pass in a democratic country. China has demonstrated the ability to control human behavior. If they could pass a one child policy? Why can’t they pass economic incentives to have children.
     
    Yes, I think this is exactly correct. These days, China has a fairly non-ideological, pragmatic government which can implement those policies it believes are best for China and for the Chinese. Meanwhile, America and most Western countries suffer from exteme ideological constraints on these demographic issues.

    Western countries supposedly have a terrible "birth dearth," especially among the middle class, and therefore require heavy foreign immigration to prevent a sharp population decline. But this is obviously total nonsense.

    Suppose, for example, government raised the tax rates by 10 points on all adults over 30 who were not already married. Surely marriage rates would skyrocket, especially among those individuals who earned substantial incomes. Then suppose the government also raised tax rates by 10 points on all individuals over 35 who had no children and by 5 points among individuals with only one child. Once again, birth rates would surely skyrocket. Add to this strong, pro-natalist media/progaganda, and huge demographic changes would probably occur.

    Admittedly, such government policies would be unthinkable in America, not least because of their quasi-eugenic taint, but this is an ideological rather than a practical barrier.

    As an analogy, suppose there were a country whose very rapidly growing population was considered a catastrophe in the making, with the main factor being that birth control was totally prohibited and condemned, both by law and by moral sanction. As an outsider, you might suggest that changes in the birth control law might easily solve the problem, but any such proposal would be considered ideologically "impossible."

    Forty or fifty years ago, the Chinese government was far more ideological than its American counterpart, which led to all sorts of problems, but these days it is the American government which operates within a narrow ideological straightjacket.

    I think the reason China isn't too concerned about its low fertility rate is that the leadership believes, not without reason, that there are already plenty of Chinese and the country is probably somewhat overcrowded. Why would they want an exponentially growing population? Instead, per capita income has been growing exponentially.

    Meanwhile, exponential population growth (entirely driven by immigration) seems to be the goal of America's leadership, while per capita income has stagnated for the last 40 years.

    The Chinese leaders seem sensible and the American ones crazy.
    , @Talha
    Hey HBDI,

    If you offered white women free daycare, schools free from violence and extra money, affordable housing you will get a baby boom.
     
    Of course we are in the realm of speculation here, but think of this; how many very wealthy White families (in the upcoming generation) do you know that can afford the best private schools for their kids and have no worries about finances that have more than 2 kids?

    You can try to control human behavior, but the will must be there. I would surmise it exists in the traditional Chinese, but not so sure about the city-dwellers.

    If they could pass a one child policy? Why can’t they pass economic incentives to have children.
     

    Preventing someone from doing something only requires will from one party, encouraging an action requires will from both - no?

    Again, this is all speculation, they may well be able to pull it off (seems MR. Unz feels that way), but I am skeptical.

    Peace.

  31. @The Anti-Gnostic
    In the future all Jews will be Orthodox and/or Israeli.

    And that will be the end of Jewish superlatives, as the Ashkenazi go extinct or outmarry.

    The Orthodox I know are like the Amish. All their energies are devoted to family and maintenance of their traditions. You are not going to get any symphonies or bullet trains out of them.

    I have worked at an Orthodox Jewish university. They don’t have as much money as Reform Jews, but they’re on average quite smart and the best students could match the best at any university. The Orthodox have 3.3 children per woman and will be the last Jews left standing in 100 years. I don’t think symphonies or bullet trains, but a lot of high-intellectual-content IT work will originate with them.

    They are a delight to work with, especially the young women: smart, polite, hard-working.

    Read More
  32. @Priss Factor
    "No they didn’t, none of them ever gained citizenship and most of them have left already, the Africans in China number only a few thousand down from the 300,000 peak."

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/26/asia/africans-leaving-guangzhou-china/index.html

    No, the article says 100s or 1000s exited. So, it means 100,000s are still around in China.

    The number of illegal Africans are difficult to count but the trend is that none of them are getting citizenship they are getting rounded up and sent back to their own countries. The Africans while in China experience extreme discrimination and racism. The Africans taking over China is never going to happen.

    The leaders of China might be redpilled.

    http://www.parapundit.com/archives/010066.html

    They are attempting to purge what little pc culture is present in China. See above , I strongly doubt that China will go down the native population genocide path caused by pc culture like the west

    Read More
  33. Borachio says:
    @TomSchmidt
    I have worked at an Orthodox Jewish university. They don't have as much money as Reform Jews, but they're on average quite smart and the best students could match the best at any university. The Orthodox have 3.3 children per woman and will be the last Jews left standing in 100 years. I don't think symphonies or bullet trains, but a lot of high-intellectual-content IT work will originate with them.

    They are a delight to work with, especially the young women: smart, polite, hard-working.

    Aw, shucks, yer makin’ me blush … :-)

    Read More
  34. tbraton says:

    “China is by far the world leader in high-speed rail, of which America has none.”

    I believe China is also the world leader in vacant high rise buildings. Maybe there is a need for high-speed rail in China that simply doesn’t exist in the U.S. I am aware of the abandoned high-speed rail line that was planned for Florida that had to be abandoned once the high cost and uneconomical nature of the scheme became apparent to many. I think the same fate awaits the high speed rail line contemplated for California. Back in the late 60′s and early 70′s, I was working in an office with a slightly older man who was a well-educated Italian, and the debate was going on about the funding of an SST by the federal government in competition with the British-French Concorde. I was swayed by articles in the WS Journal that argued that the SST was uneconomical while my Italian friend bemoaned the fact that the U.S. was abandoning its leading role in technology. Well, we decided to pull the plug on the SST, and the Europeans went ahead with the Concorde. The Concorde flew for more than 20 years before the British and French decided to drop it because it wasn’t making money. It’s nice to have super duper technology, but, if it’s not economical, it won’t last, and it will cost you unnecessarily as it diverts money to uneconomic goals.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Japan still has the greatest high-speed rail system in the world. Also the first.

    China's may already be more extensive for distance (can't be bothered to check, but likely true by now, given the greater distances), but hardly a network, so far a high incident rate, and much of the tech. and know-how is pilfered from here (and I would guess to a lesser extent, France).

    The network here can't really be called a network, The hub is very much Tokyo. In a few regional cities, there are switches, where the train is split, and the parts go on to different destinations.

    There is a plan to make Osaka a second hub, but I have no idea how that is supposed to fit in with the planned Tokyo-to-Osaka maglev.

    The current theoretical maximum for splitting trains is about three times, but the trains only have two destinations, at least the last time I rode one, so I think the switching is limited to two .

    I like the slow trains, and recent policy has been to make a consortium of prefectural govt.and existing local private lines take over lines where the bullet trains run on different lines, with Japan Rail holding a share.

    Where the bullet trains run on existing lines, so are only as fast as the special expresses they replaced, the slow trains run three to five times a day.

    but, if it’s not economical, it won’t last, and it will cost you unnecessarily as it diverts money to uneconomic goals
     
    Indeed, the airport-to-city maglev in China has a strong scent of white elephant about it.

    The new bullet-train services to Hokkaido (particularly) and to the sth.-west are not well-patronised most of the time, the old combinations of all-stops, commuter express in some places at some times, and special express did a better job.

    Concorde, wish I'd ridden it once, closest I'd ever be to space, an economy window seat would have been pricey, but just affordable, a small life regret. At least I saw a real Tu 144 landing, once. Think I never saw a Concorde, except in the sky once, maybe that was also a Tupolev.
    , @rod1963
    The Chinese stole the all high speed train tech from France and Japan. They copied it blindly and have had several grisly collisions that resulted in many deaths.

    The same can be applied to their space program where they blatantly ripped off NASA.

    Nothing there to brag about.

    High tech and manufacturing - again ripping off other nations IP or even forcing them to build their factories in China and train Chinese workers and engineers in how it's all done.

    The Chines got a massive jump start because of the West who wanted their markets.

    Smart? That's debatable. Crooked yes. The Great Leap Forward really F-uped China culturally, they lost thousands of years of culture because of the commies and it screwed with them. This is why the rich Chinese send their kids to American colleges. Send them to Beijing U. and they can buy a MD or BS in Engineering for under $4k. Go to a public clinic and you might get one of those "doctors" who can't read a X-Ray or blood panel work up.

    Why are so many Chinese in American universities - because degrees from those schools are still valued. So Chinese parent are willing to pay $$$ for their kids to attend so the university gives the white kids the boot and give their slot to some Chinese student who is paying 2-3x the amount of tuition because they're foreigners.

    This isn't to say they aren't smart. There is a percentage who are wickedly smart and it's obvious, but we don't hear about the ones who aren't. That includes a lot of those rich Chinese kids who paid for stand ins to take their tests so they could attend some swanky American school and probably will have someone do all the school work for them while in school. Every so often the schools get wind of the scams the Chinese are pulling and send them packing by the gross.

    In regards to materialism, they are very materialistic and follow modern trends quite slavishly. They are certainly different than their parents and much different than their grandparents in that regard.
  35. Ron Unz says:
    @Priss Factor
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeE_JGW-o50

    Actually, I think these critiques of China’s prospects are just total MSM nonsense/propaganda, much like how the old USSR used to endlessly critique America’s dreadful economic problems during the 1970s and 1980s.

    Sure, all the MSM headlines endlessly tout China’s terrible “economic slowdown”…except that even during this so-called “slowdown” China’s per capita GDP has been increasing at roughly 10x America’s rate. Here’s a handy chart from one of my old articles from a few years ago you might want to consider reading especially since none of the trends have changed all that much:

    http://www.unz.com/article/chinas-rise-americas-fall/

    The real income of urban Chinese workers has been doubling every 5-10 years. It seems to me if the real income of ordinary American workers were doubling every decade, there’d be far fewer complaints about the One Percent.

    Commenters who endlessly ridicule the absurd claims of the MSM on some matters should be more cautious in blindly believing it on other matters.

    Read More
    • Replies: @pink_point
    I challenge you to find a funnier example or wishful thinking on China than at:

    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/chinas-twilight-years/480768/

    "Twilight years". And soon they'll have to open their borders...
    , @bossel

    ”…except that even during this so-called “slowdown” China’s per capita GDP has been increasing at roughly 10x America’s rate.
     
    Your chart only shows data till 2010. The slowdown only really started 2 or 3 years ago. I doubt that Chinese incomes are still doubling so quickly. They may still be growing overall (definitely not in all sectors of the economy), but not as fast as before.

    China has a fairly non-ideological, pragmatic government
     
    Again, not so much anymore. Xi Jinping is the most ideological leader the PRC had for a long time. Depends on how you define "fairly", but under Xi it's going quite rapidly backwards.

    implement those policies it believes are best for China and for the Chinese
     
    Mainly it implements those policies which help the CPC to stay in power.

    Surely marriage rates would skyrocket
     
    Similar measures as mentioned have been (partially in effect for a long time or recently) taken in several European countries. Hasn't changed much.

    The Chinese leaders seem sensible
     
    Good one. The key word here is probably "seem".
    , @George
    1900 was supposed to be the start of the German century, and it was: Germans in America.

    It may be that politcal systems do matter.

    WWII era remark: They might have more Germans, but we have better Germans. USA#1!!!!
    , @dahoit
    Stop the nonsense people.Asians are smart hard working citizens,who add greatly to our nation.
    Has anyone seen the pictures that were in the Graun a few months ago on the transformation of the Pearl River Delta?
    Unbelievable.
    And we get shite.
    The only maglev we ever had was taken out of Disney World years ago.
    And no they don't do current shitey pop music.
  36. Ron Unz says:
    @Hbd investor
    While the will may not be there, the government has near absolute power.

    They can produce and implement as much propaganda and economic incentive as they want.

    They have done things thought to be impossible in the west like banning Islam

    They managed to implement a one child policy something that would be impossible to pass in a democratic country.

    China has demonstrated the ability to control human behavior

    If they could pass a one child policy? Why can't they pass economic incentives to have children.

    If you offered white women free daycare, schools free from violence and extra money, affordable housing you will get a baby boom.

    The fact is that European population is at a all time high, and this has led to skyrocketing living costs. If you look at the areas with low living costs all the whites there have a house with 5 bedrooms 2 bathrooms, a garage and driveway and a dog or cat but most important they tend to have 2 or more kids

    They can produce and implement as much propaganda and economic incentive as they want…They managed to implement a one child policy something that would be impossible to pass in a democratic country. China has demonstrated the ability to control human behavior. If they could pass a one child policy? Why can’t they pass economic incentives to have children.

    Yes, I think this is exactly correct. These days, China has a fairly non-ideological, pragmatic government which can implement those policies it believes are best for China and for the Chinese. Meanwhile, America and most Western countries suffer from exteme ideological constraints on these demographic issues.

    Western countries supposedly have a terrible “birth dearth,” especially among the middle class, and therefore require heavy foreign immigration to prevent a sharp population decline. But this is obviously total nonsense.

    Suppose, for example, government raised the tax rates by 10 points on all adults over 30 who were not already married. Surely marriage rates would skyrocket, especially among those individuals who earned substantial incomes. Then suppose the government also raised tax rates by 10 points on all individuals over 35 who had no children and by 5 points among individuals with only one child. Once again, birth rates would surely skyrocket. Add to this strong, pro-natalist media/progaganda, and huge demographic changes would probably occur.

    Admittedly, such government policies would be unthinkable in America, not least because of their quasi-eugenic taint, but this is an ideological rather than a practical barrier.

    As an analogy, suppose there were a country whose very rapidly growing population was considered a catastrophe in the making, with the main factor being that birth control was totally prohibited and condemned, both by law and by moral sanction. As an outsider, you might suggest that changes in the birth control law might easily solve the problem, but any such proposal would be considered ideologically “impossible.”

    Forty or fifty years ago, the Chinese government was far more ideological than its American counterpart, which led to all sorts of problems, but these days it is the American government which operates within a narrow ideological straightjacket.

    I think the reason China isn’t too concerned about its low fertility rate is that the leadership believes, not without reason, that there are already plenty of Chinese and the country is probably somewhat overcrowded. Why would they want an exponentially growing population? Instead, per capita income has been growing exponentially.

    Meanwhile, exponential population growth (entirely driven by immigration) seems to be the goal of America’s leadership, while per capita income has stagnated for the last 40 years.

    The Chinese leaders seem sensible and the American ones crazy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mtn cur
    Chinese leaders include many engineers and other eclectics, with few lawyers, of course they seem sensible by comparison.
    , @pink_point
    "China has demonstrated the ability to control human behavior", says the reader you replied to.

    Does he know of some place where that is not the case? Is he/she reading and "watching" the USA-EU mainstream media af of late?

    Our current status of affairs comes from far in the past, at least 60 years.

    I pick one quote by one neuroscientists, one quote among countless quotes by Western, usually Anglo-Saxon, psychologists, psychiatrists, of the 20th century.

    "We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically manipulated. The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain."

    The 2 differences with China (and Russia) is their governors work for the good of their governed, and even liberty is going to find more space in their culture and society, whereas the West has slipped back to authoritarianism, and a menacious one at that: one in which the governers seem to loathe the governed, and work with all but their governed's interest in their mind.
    --------------

    Coming to your point on fertility, I see what you say, but what about birth rates in South Korea/Japan?
    Besides, I have read they are steeply falling in the Muslimsphere too, as well as in Israel.

    Regardless, I can't see anything "eugenicist" to such policies.

    ----------------------
    "Forty or fifty years ago, the Chinese government was far more ideological than its American counterpart, which led to all sorts of problems, but these days it is the American government which operates within a narrow ideological straightjacket."

    A naive observer would wonder why, if ideology and authoritarianism blight countries and hinder advancement, do governments allow themselves become ideological?

    But asking that question assumes free will, the free will of governments

    , @Daniel H
    I'm going long Baidu on Tuesday. Has 90% of the Chinese search market. Is profitable. Has PE ration of around 10. Compare that to Google.
    , @Wade
    All I can say is Damn, I hope you get elected!

    I don't live in California so I can't vote for you.
  37. mtn cur says:

    What do you mean, “noticeably more advanced than carrier pigeons,” NSA can’t eavesdrop on the old mark I model 0 homing pigeon and likely never will.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    LOL! Or ravens - GOT style!
    , @Karl
    > NSA can’t eavesdrop on the old mark I model 0 homing pigeon and likely never will

    Prussians had hawks to take out French pigeons smuggling messages out the Siege of Paris. Says wiki. Wiki is set up to repeat what someone else wrote; not all that much actual fact checking.
  38. mtn cur says:
    @Ron Unz

    They can produce and implement as much propaganda and economic incentive as they want...They managed to implement a one child policy something that would be impossible to pass in a democratic country. China has demonstrated the ability to control human behavior. If they could pass a one child policy? Why can’t they pass economic incentives to have children.
     
    Yes, I think this is exactly correct. These days, China has a fairly non-ideological, pragmatic government which can implement those policies it believes are best for China and for the Chinese. Meanwhile, America and most Western countries suffer from exteme ideological constraints on these demographic issues.

    Western countries supposedly have a terrible "birth dearth," especially among the middle class, and therefore require heavy foreign immigration to prevent a sharp population decline. But this is obviously total nonsense.

    Suppose, for example, government raised the tax rates by 10 points on all adults over 30 who were not already married. Surely marriage rates would skyrocket, especially among those individuals who earned substantial incomes. Then suppose the government also raised tax rates by 10 points on all individuals over 35 who had no children and by 5 points among individuals with only one child. Once again, birth rates would surely skyrocket. Add to this strong, pro-natalist media/progaganda, and huge demographic changes would probably occur.

    Admittedly, such government policies would be unthinkable in America, not least because of their quasi-eugenic taint, but this is an ideological rather than a practical barrier.

    As an analogy, suppose there were a country whose very rapidly growing population was considered a catastrophe in the making, with the main factor being that birth control was totally prohibited and condemned, both by law and by moral sanction. As an outsider, you might suggest that changes in the birth control law might easily solve the problem, but any such proposal would be considered ideologically "impossible."

    Forty or fifty years ago, the Chinese government was far more ideological than its American counterpart, which led to all sorts of problems, but these days it is the American government which operates within a narrow ideological straightjacket.

    I think the reason China isn't too concerned about its low fertility rate is that the leadership believes, not without reason, that there are already plenty of Chinese and the country is probably somewhat overcrowded. Why would they want an exponentially growing population? Instead, per capita income has been growing exponentially.

    Meanwhile, exponential population growth (entirely driven by immigration) seems to be the goal of America's leadership, while per capita income has stagnated for the last 40 years.

    The Chinese leaders seem sensible and the American ones crazy.

    Chinese leaders include many engineers and other eclectics, with few lawyers, of course they seem sensible by comparison.

    Read More
  39. Talha says:
    @Hbd investor
    While the will may not be there, the government has near absolute power.

    They can produce and implement as much propaganda and economic incentive as they want.

    They have done things thought to be impossible in the west like banning Islam

    They managed to implement a one child policy something that would be impossible to pass in a democratic country.

    China has demonstrated the ability to control human behavior

    If they could pass a one child policy? Why can't they pass economic incentives to have children.

    If you offered white women free daycare, schools free from violence and extra money, affordable housing you will get a baby boom.

    The fact is that European population is at a all time high, and this has led to skyrocketing living costs. If you look at the areas with low living costs all the whites there have a house with 5 bedrooms 2 bathrooms, a garage and driveway and a dog or cat but most important they tend to have 2 or more kids

    Hey HBDI,

    If you offered white women free daycare, schools free from violence and extra money, affordable housing you will get a baby boom.

    Of course we are in the realm of speculation here, but think of this; how many very wealthy White families (in the upcoming generation) do you know that can afford the best private schools for their kids and have no worries about finances that have more than 2 kids?

    You can try to control human behavior, but the will must be there. I would surmise it exists in the traditional Chinese, but not so sure about the city-dwellers.

    If they could pass a one child policy? Why can’t they pass economic incentives to have children.

    Preventing someone from doing something only requires will from one party, encouraging an action requires will from both – no?

    Again, this is all speculation, they may well be able to pull it off (seems MR. Unz feels that way), but I am skeptical.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hbd investor
    >but think of this; how many very wealthy White families (in the upcoming generation) do you know that can afford the best private schools for their kids and have no worries about finances that have more than 2 kids?

    The Mormon communities don't have a problem churning out kids, a lot of non Mormon whites also live with the Mormons and they also churn out a lot of kids.

    Why?

    Because everyone has a large 5 bed 2 bath house and they barely pay anything in taxes. The public schools in the area are good enough and safe enough so the parents don't have to move to an area where real estate costs a small fortune. Their are no nam's committing crimes.

    Just like how many animals in captivity refuse to breed until certain conditions are met. Whites are the same way, many whites would not consider breeding if crime and violence are high, cost of living high, population density high, not enough money saved up, not enough other children around to socialize with
    , @SolontoCroesus
    In the years immediately after war w/ Iraq, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary leadership implemented pro-reproduction policies very much like those that Ron described. Where do you think the population bubble of under-40s in Iran came from? While it is usually the case that a culture that experienced devastating losses in war would experience a subsequent decline in fertility (a situation that was deliberately exacerbated in Germany post-WWII), the IRI took deliberate measures to successfully counter that phenomenon.

    Iran invested in education, including education of women -- college is state-subsidized for those who pass certain tests; 60% of university students are female. -- also invested heavily in community health care, extended to Iran's rural populations, where electrification and education were also prioritized.

    Iran has had ethnically diverse populations for centuries, but they are united around Islamic-inflected core Persian culture -- in literature, language, architecture, art, and an awareness of their history. But whichever -- ethnically diverse or culturally unified, Iranian women mated with Iranian men to produce Iranian children.
  40. “Jewish” is just a label. If you want to find out where the smarts are going, follow the smart genes, not the label.

    The smartest Jews tend to be secular, and about half of secular Jews are marrying non-Jews, and most of the ones that do raise their kids non-Jewish. (1488 crowd shibboleths notwithstanding). When those kids grow up, they have some of the smart genes, (or all, if assortative mating is holding up). But they don’t have the Jewish label.

    Read More
  41. Intelligence and creativity are not quite the same thing. Asians bred for conformity. Two Jews have three opinions, even when they are all bad. That Nobel thingy isn’t going to change as much as the student body of Caltech.

    Read More
  42. @Talha
    Hey HBDI,

    If you offered white women free daycare, schools free from violence and extra money, affordable housing you will get a baby boom.
     
    Of course we are in the realm of speculation here, but think of this; how many very wealthy White families (in the upcoming generation) do you know that can afford the best private schools for their kids and have no worries about finances that have more than 2 kids?

    You can try to control human behavior, but the will must be there. I would surmise it exists in the traditional Chinese, but not so sure about the city-dwellers.

    If they could pass a one child policy? Why can’t they pass economic incentives to have children.
     

    Preventing someone from doing something only requires will from one party, encouraging an action requires will from both - no?

    Again, this is all speculation, they may well be able to pull it off (seems MR. Unz feels that way), but I am skeptical.

    Peace.

    >but think of this; how many very wealthy White families (in the upcoming generation) do you know that can afford the best private schools for their kids and have no worries about finances that have more than 2 kids?

    The Mormon communities don’t have a problem churning out kids, a lot of non Mormon whites also live with the Mormons and they also churn out a lot of kids.

    Why?

    Because everyone has a large 5 bed 2 bath house and they barely pay anything in taxes. The public schools in the area are good enough and safe enough so the parents don’t have to move to an area where real estate costs a small fortune. Their are no nam’s committing crimes.

    Just like how many animals in captivity refuse to breed until certain conditions are met. Whites are the same way, many whites would not consider breeding if crime and violence are high, cost of living high, population density high, not enough money saved up, not enough other children around to socialize with

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Good points! Mormons are a special case though (wouldn't you agree - I'm a Muslim and had the easiest time getting along with traditional Mormons in high school) - I would put them in the same archetype as the traditional Chinese I was talking about. But city-dwelling (post)modern minded whites or Chinese don't fit this mold. I guess we'll see, but I do pray for what's best for the Chinese people.

    Also, on your point about Chinese policy vis-a-vis Islam; Islam is an very old force in China (UR contributor Razib Khan has written some excellent stuff), and it seems the pragmatic Chinese deal with different Muslims differently:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/02/world/asia/china-islam-hui-ningxia.html?_r=0
    http://time.com/3099950/china-muslim-hui-xinjiang-uighur-islam/
    http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/harmony-and-martyrdom-among-chinas-hui-muslims

    Peace.

    , @TheJester
    Good point! Your comments parallel a recent article I read regarding why Germans are not having kids: high cost of living, high population density, small cramped apartments. There is also another very important shared reason: delayed marriage. As in Germany, the typical WASP in America now marries in his or her 30s. The women are already on the downward curve of their fertility cycles ... and couples are habituated to lifestyles that do not make allowance for the disruptive existence of children in their lives.

    We used to have a saying when I was growing up in the 1960s:

    Young women should never marry men over 30 because they make lousy husbands.
     
    Why? In spite of their best intentions, by that time the men are committed bachelors in their values and lifestyles ... and they will never change; that is, they will never become involved and attentive husbands and fathers. Jump ahead 20 years when women are also delaying marriage until their 30s and you get the same result. For both of them, having matched BMWs in the garage, evenings in the local pub, and exotic vacations are more appealing than changing diapers, sorting out (expensive) child care issues, and worrying about how to pay for college.
  43. I think one factor in the changing results for Jews is the fact that they have diverted so much of their attention to politics in the last 50 years. Maybe it’s my personal bias against politics as a worthwhile endeavor, but I do think this diversion of effort has not served them well.

    I understand that there have been many politically involved Jews for the last couple of centuries, but in the last 50 years it has become almost obligatory, like WASPS playing golf or “good ol’ boys hunting and fishing”.

    Read More
  44. Talha says:
    @mtn cur
    What do you mean, "noticeably more advanced than carrier pigeons," NSA can't eavesdrop on the old mark I model 0 homing pigeon and likely never will.

    LOL! Or ravens – GOT style!

    Read More
  45. and get this fred, we go out of our way to impede our asians, giving them a 15% quota in the top universities.

    retards every where in our govt/leadership.

    Read More
  46. Talha says:
    @Hbd investor
    >but think of this; how many very wealthy White families (in the upcoming generation) do you know that can afford the best private schools for their kids and have no worries about finances that have more than 2 kids?

    The Mormon communities don't have a problem churning out kids, a lot of non Mormon whites also live with the Mormons and they also churn out a lot of kids.

    Why?

    Because everyone has a large 5 bed 2 bath house and they barely pay anything in taxes. The public schools in the area are good enough and safe enough so the parents don't have to move to an area where real estate costs a small fortune. Their are no nam's committing crimes.

    Just like how many animals in captivity refuse to breed until certain conditions are met. Whites are the same way, many whites would not consider breeding if crime and violence are high, cost of living high, population density high, not enough money saved up, not enough other children around to socialize with

    Good points! Mormons are a special case though (wouldn’t you agree – I’m a Muslim and had the easiest time getting along with traditional Mormons in high school) – I would put them in the same archetype as the traditional Chinese I was talking about. But city-dwelling (post)modern minded whites or Chinese don’t fit this mold. I guess we’ll see, but I do pray for what’s best for the Chinese people.

    Also, on your point about Chinese policy vis-a-vis Islam; Islam is an very old force in China (UR contributor Razib Khan has written some excellent stuff), and it seems the pragmatic Chinese deal with different Muslims differently:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/02/world/asia/china-islam-hui-ningxia.html?_r=0

    http://time.com/3099950/china-muslim-hui-xinjiang-uighur-islam/

    http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/harmony-and-martyrdom-among-chinas-hui-muslims

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @pink_point
    http://www.economist.com/news/china/21662592-article-looks-sharp-rise-young-chinese-happy-live-themselves-next-old

    Maybe you had already read that news, or guessed it on your own; if so, you guessed very right.
    Life style and ambitions of young Chinese in China's big cities is shifting very quickly to Western, "postmodern" model. 30% live alone in the most "advanced" areas, and many want to do the same as soon as they can.
  47. Discard says:

    There is no reason to think that the Chinese that come here are representative of the Chinese nation. If I were the King of China, I would have noted how American policy in the Middle East has been influenced by a wealthy, educated minority, and would then seek to establish my own wealthy, educated minority to serve Chinese interests. They got over a billion people, surely they can spare a few million of the sharper ones to colonize the U.S.

    Read More
  48. Discard says:

    Smart Jews did not go into physics because they just seemed to have a special affinity for it, they went for physics because it’s a road to success that had objective standards. Jew or not, if you could do calculus or whatever, there was a place for you.

    OTOH, law and finance require a level of trust not readily extended to outsiders. Having become the insiders since WW2, smart Jews can make a lot more money from Harvard than MIT. The decline in Jewish scientific achievement is due to them taking the easier path of financial and legal manipulation. That’s my guess anyway.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    Maybe its the collapse of Jewish enlightenment caused by the Zionist project.
    They are a bunch of nazis to illustrate that.
    Scientist never made much dough anyway,and the collapse of their humanity is cojoined with the lust for money,a most unenlightened enterprise to enlightened people.
    , @Anonymous Nephew
    There's a UK parallel in that we don't have great Jewish industrialists like Alfred Mond or the people who created the various companies that became GEC any more.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_Company_plc

    On the other hand, two out of the last four of our Lords Chief Justice have been Jewish.
  49. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:

    It’s no wonder Chiners run circles around the Filos, the most ridiculous people on the planet(except for Michelle Malkin).

    https://www.rt.com/news/349104-kill-drug-addicts-philippines/

    Read More
  50. OLD JEW says:

    Dear Fred Reed,

    I concur with the explanation offered by your Jewish friend: “We’ve lost our hunger.”

    In third grade this Jewish girl immigrant from Moscow came into my daughters class.

    Mu daughter (born in America) showed her around, helped her with English, etc..

    Both girls eventually went to Ivy League Universities, and are still best friends 25 years later.

    We owned our house, our daughter could afford a lot of things, while Y. lived in a small crowded apartment.
    By middle school my daughter still had better grades, but by end of 12th grade her friend overtook her (even worse, the Jewish kids were not the very best, the valedictorian was a young Korean man).

    What gives?

    Y.s Dad, a Moscow Physics and Math teacher, was a “Tiger Dad’. He gave his daughters additional exercises, and tutored them in his subject matter. not only did he expect top performance but he made sure they understood what they were doing. It was not silly drilling, but the best Russian/Soviet elite High School method.

    My daughter took those after school lectures with her friend, but not all of them.

    All the kids in the top had all A’s. I was lackadaisical. As long as my kid brought home A’s (whether a 92% A or a 98% A) it was fine with me. The kids in that school were bright young people (it was one of the best schools in the metropolis), and more so, those top ten ranked kids.

    I believe the difference in ranking can be explained by “immigrant hunger”.

    None of these kids came from abject poverty.

    But above a certain minimum threshold, the family hardships they overcame, pushed the kids to higher achievements.

    sf

    Read More
    • Replies: @pickwickcircle24
    Only 5 or 6 instances of boasting.
    A little less than the habitual rate.

    Mirror mirror on the wall, who's the fairest of all?
    Of course they must be all A's: you don't want that mirror to return an offensive answer one day or another.
  51. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Fred.

    What you have to understand about white people in America, and especially the kind of white people who read Sailer and Unz, is that a big part of their identity comes from trying to kraft the world that they would be most comfortable in. Any self awareness on whats really going on will just bring about a sense of dread and hopelessness.

    So the modern whites who look at some of the facts you mentioned will be more interested in spinning things to show that whites are superior instead of looking at anything truthfully.

    Asians are just grinders, not creative, etc etc. Pure Schadenfreude.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dcite
    More or less true; however, Asians are coming here and not so much the other way round, although there are a fair number of Asiaphiles who would be in Asia if they allowed more whites to settle there, although probably not in the millions. I wanted very much to live in France when I was in college, but when I heard that the French themselves had a hard time finding jobs, I gave that up -- I'd never want to take a French job from a French person.
    So no matter how much "schadenfreude" the commenters manifest, it is not "pure." They have a point. Asians are coming here to be, more or less, Americans. Americans don't go there to be Chinese or Koreans or Taiwanese in any numbers. They go to sell stuff -- a religion, a factory. No white person thinks he or she could become a Japanese or an Indian. At best,you'd be a pretender, a sympathizer. At least "American" is generic these days, but there are those who still consider their ethnic labels exclusive to themselves.
    So what are we supposed to think? An awful lot want to be here, and even more would be here if they could. It leads Americans (at least the white kind) to unflattering speculation and self-reverential comparisons. Asians have the same range of creativity, humor, etc. as whites, but we don't understand much about their cultures. There are reasons that "western" modern society has become the default, and reasons for those whose immediate ancestors created it, to be proud of its more attractive aspects. That may be what certain commenters are trying to express. Asians are very aware of themselves as Asians, yet white natives are not even supposed to notice or care. You sort of wonder why they come; America peaked in the 60s, before there was a huge Asian presence. Computers and the internet (a DARPA project begun for the Pentagon in the late 60s) were already part of the warp and the woof. You sort of wonder why all these people don't just stay put and make their own countries their version of America, if they want that so much. And if they can't create another America, well, then that does mean we're "superior." There's a ready made America for them. Why spend 100 years creating another one. And so it goes on and on.
  52. kiismerh says:

    It seems to me that the Chinese, Japanese and Koreans are smarter than the rest of the Asians so if the average Asian IQ is 105 than they should be over 110. However since their sense of humor seems to be on the level of a 10 year old they can’t be too original. ( I think those correlate) Because of that extreme lack of sense of humor I feel that most Asians could be considered very high-functioning autistics.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hacienda
    There is a growing gap between the West and the East. This is exhibit A.

    Asians know the West deeply and well. And this understanding is increasing, even to places where Asians know more about the West than the westerners themselves. OTOH, westerners still know next to nothing about Asians and are descending into hand waving, pardon me's, and throwaway judgements.

    Just take my word for it, Korean comedy and humour can be subtle and funny as any comic hero in the US- Woody Allen, Seinfeld, Steve Martin, etc. You're blithering ignorant.

  53. Hacienda says:
    @kiismerh
    It seems to me that the Chinese, Japanese and Koreans are smarter than the rest of the Asians so if the average Asian IQ is 105 than they should be over 110. However since their sense of humor seems to be on the level of a 10 year old they can't be too original. ( I think those correlate) Because of that extreme lack of sense of humor I feel that most Asians could be considered very high-functioning autistics.

    There is a growing gap between the West and the East. This is exhibit A.

    Asians know the West deeply and well. And this understanding is increasing, even to places where Asians know more about the West than the westerners themselves. OTOH, westerners still know next to nothing about Asians and are descending into hand waving, pardon me’s, and throwaway judgements.

    Just take my word for it, Korean comedy and humour can be subtle and funny as any comic hero in the US- Woody Allen, Seinfeld, Steve Martin, etc. You’re blithering ignorant.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    I highly doubt someone would feel the need to tell somebody else they are "blithering ignorant", if they weren't at least a little ignorant (and maybe more), and if they had confidence in what they stated.

    I have known many Mongolian Asians, including Chinese, and confirm @kiismerh experience.

    Intelligent comes in many shapes, and they excel only at one kind of it, that I would call technical, engineer-istic. In that, they excel to a degree a Westerner is hardly going to imagine before he/she knows some.
    Your average Japanese shopkeeper can compute better than your average good student of mathematics in the West, and they have a huge knob for logic.

    While they are particularly weak in the field of creativity, imagination, and so forth: and incapable of grasping verbal analogies and jokes, or anything needing the smallest grain of imagination to an extent that can surprise a Westerner.

    This correlates a lot with their genetic tendency toward conformity, that is, in turn, reflected by their political systems and great stability (they also suffer from far more less psychic diseases and disturbances of the kind caused by high emotionability and stress).

    I don't, and I assume @kiismerh doesn't, need to "take your word for it" (who would take the word of someone who speaks by insults, by the way?), as I, and I assume he too, speak by experience.
    , @kiismerh
    1. You are obviously Korean and think that you have a great sense of humor both as an individual and as a nation.
    2. You seem to think since that is what you learned from the Western media that Woody Allen and Seinfeld are the epitomes of a sophisticated sense of humor. "Just take my word for it", they are very far from that. (I don't know Steve Martin)

    I know I can't convince you that you are wrong on both accounts that is why I had to steal quoted line from your message. If I could than I would be able to teach you a sense of humor as well.
  54. @OLD JEW
    Dear Fred Reed,

    I concur with the explanation offered by your Jewish friend: “We’ve lost our hunger.”

    In third grade this Jewish girl immigrant from Moscow came into my daughters class.

    Mu daughter (born in America) showed her around, helped her with English, etc..

    Both girls eventually went to Ivy League Universities, and are still best friends 25 years later.

    We owned our house, our daughter could afford a lot of things, while Y. lived in a small crowded apartment.
    By middle school my daughter still had better grades, but by end of 12th grade her friend overtook her (even worse, the Jewish kids were not the very best, the valedictorian was a young Korean man).

    What gives?

    Y.s Dad, a Moscow Physics and Math teacher, was a "Tiger Dad'. He gave his daughters additional exercises, and tutored them in his subject matter. not only did he expect top performance but he made sure they understood what they were doing. It was not silly drilling, but the best Russian/Soviet elite High School method.

    My daughter took those after school lectures with her friend, but not all of them.

    All the kids in the top had all A's. I was lackadaisical. As long as my kid brought home A's (whether a 92% A or a 98% A) it was fine with me. The kids in that school were bright young people (it was one of the best schools in the metropolis), and more so, those top ten ranked kids.

    I believe the difference in ranking can be explained by "immigrant hunger".

    None of these kids came from abject poverty.

    But above a certain minimum threshold, the family hardships they overcame, pushed the kids to higher achievements.

    sf

    Only 5 or 6 instances of boasting.
    A little less than the habitual rate.

    Mirror mirror on the wall, who’s the fairest of all?
    Of course they must be all A’s: you don’t want that mirror to return an offensive answer one day or another.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OLD JEW
    Dear P.

    You make a salient point, a good point.

    Please forgive.

    My bias and prejudice show. In plain sight.

    Look at my pseudonym: besides being a Jew, I am also Old.

    Thus tend to look back 25 years ago thru rosy glasses.

    But notice, I did not mention MY school grades (way less to boast about)
    only my daughter's and her friend.

    I remember, it irked me that those smart Asian kids ranked in the three top spots.

    Sorry,
    sf
  55. dcite says:
    @Anonymous
    Fred.

    What you have to understand about white people in America, and especially the kind of white people who read Sailer and Unz, is that a big part of their identity comes from trying to kraft the world that they would be most comfortable in. Any self awareness on whats really going on will just bring about a sense of dread and hopelessness.

    So the modern whites who look at some of the facts you mentioned will be more interested in spinning things to show that whites are superior instead of looking at anything truthfully.

    Asians are just grinders, not creative, etc etc. Pure Schadenfreude.

    More or less true; however, Asians are coming here and not so much the other way round, although there are a fair number of Asiaphiles who would be in Asia if they allowed more whites to settle there, although probably not in the millions. I wanted very much to live in France when I was in college, but when I heard that the French themselves had a hard time finding jobs, I gave that up — I’d never want to take a French job from a French person.
    So no matter how much “schadenfreude” the commenters manifest, it is not “pure.” They have a point. Asians are coming here to be, more or less, Americans. Americans don’t go there to be Chinese or Koreans or Taiwanese in any numbers. They go to sell stuff — a religion, a factory. No white person thinks he or she could become a Japanese or an Indian. At best,you’d be a pretender, a sympathizer. At least “American” is generic these days, but there are those who still consider their ethnic labels exclusive to themselves.
    So what are we supposed to think? An awful lot want to be here, and even more would be here if they could. It leads Americans (at least the white kind) to unflattering speculation and self-reverential comparisons. Asians have the same range of creativity, humor, etc. as whites, but we don’t understand much about their cultures. There are reasons that “western” modern society has become the default, and reasons for those whose immediate ancestors created it, to be proud of its more attractive aspects. That may be what certain commenters are trying to express. Asians are very aware of themselves as Asians, yet white natives are not even supposed to notice or care. You sort of wonder why they come; America peaked in the 60s, before there was a huge Asian presence. Computers and the internet (a DARPA project begun for the Pentagon in the late 60s) were already part of the warp and the woof. You sort of wonder why all these people don’t just stay put and make their own countries their version of America, if they want that so much. And if they can’t create another America, well, then that does mean we’re “superior.” There’s a ready made America for them. Why spend 100 years creating another one. And so it goes on and on.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Asians want to come here because of the money. It's not culture that drives people here, be it asians or others.

    If whites immigrate somewhere en mass, it will be because somewhere else offers them better economic opportunity, not because of cultural reasons. You travel some place to experience the culture, you don't move.

    It used to be that America was rich because of the hard work of its people, now America is mainly rich because of momentum and dollar hedgemony. Both of which are becoming unwound.

    So a lot of Fred observed is based on whites just grasping for straws of how da chinaman's success is just smoke and mirrors and China will crumble.
    , @artichoke
    Also they come here because we're soft. We don't want to beat them, but they do want to beat us. We need some hunger, some competitive spirit.
  56. Anonymous says: • Website • Disclaimer
    @Hacienda
    There is a growing gap between the West and the East. This is exhibit A.

    Asians know the West deeply and well. And this understanding is increasing, even to places where Asians know more about the West than the westerners themselves. OTOH, westerners still know next to nothing about Asians and are descending into hand waving, pardon me's, and throwaway judgements.

    Just take my word for it, Korean comedy and humour can be subtle and funny as any comic hero in the US- Woody Allen, Seinfeld, Steve Martin, etc. You're blithering ignorant.

    I highly doubt someone would feel the need to tell somebody else they are “blithering ignorant”, if they weren’t at least a little ignorant (and maybe more), and if they had confidence in what they stated.

    I have known many Mongolian Asians, including Chinese, and confirm experience.

    Intelligent comes in many shapes, and they excel only at one kind of it, that I would call technical, engineer-istic. In that, they excel to a degree a Westerner is hardly going to imagine before he/she knows some.
    Your average Japanese shopkeeper can compute better than your average good student of mathematics in the West, and they have a huge knob for logic.

    While they are particularly weak in the field of creativity, imagination, and so forth: and incapable of grasping verbal analogies and jokes, or anything needing the smallest grain of imagination to an extent that can surprise a Westerner.

    This correlates a lot with their genetic tendency toward conformity, that is, in turn, reflected by their political systems and great stability (they also suffer from far more less psychic diseases and disturbances of the kind caused by high emotionability and stress).

    I don’t, and I assume doesn’t, need to “take your word for it” (who would take the word of someone who speaks by insults, by the way?), as I, and I assume he too, speak by experience.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hacienda
    I'm Korean American and bilingual. Known Koreans and Americans all my life.
    So, unless you have a similar background, yes, take my word for it. Koreans don't lack humor and they aren't high functioning autistics. Humor is a deep thing that comes in all varieties, from all conditions, like music. I'm telling you, white humor is not always the best humor. Peak white American humor occurred early 20th century, sorry, it did. Now it's all about transgenderism, apologetics to colored people, and geeky bitch'in. While this is funny too, it's not the same. Just not.
    , @Anonymous
    This is just the same tired old yarn white people keep spinning.

    That Asians are drones who are only good at taking tests and whites are wonderful creative types who are all busy inventing ipods.

    First of all, a lot of the "spark" you see from white people comes from Jewish white people. Not your common white you see walking around. Einstein, Seinfeld, Spielberg are all Jewish.

    Remove Jews from the white population and your creative narrative falls apart considerably.

    Second, as mentioned in the article, the types of Jews who contributed a lot to Science and to the Arts has diminished a lot as Ashkenazi Jews have either intermarriage or produced below the replacement rate. Low IQ Orthodox Jews are the ones who have been breeding and will replace the smart Jews.
  57. @Ron Unz
    Actually, I think these critiques of China's prospects are just total MSM nonsense/propaganda, much like how the old USSR used to endlessly critique America's dreadful economic problems during the 1970s and 1980s.

    Sure, all the MSM headlines endlessly tout China's terrible "economic slowdown"...except that even during this so-called "slowdown" China's per capita GDP has been increasing at roughly 10x America's rate. Here's a handy chart from one of my old articles from a few years ago you might want to consider reading especially since none of the trends have changed all that much:



    http://www.unz.com/article/chinas-rise-americas-fall/

    The real income of urban Chinese workers has been doubling every 5-10 years. It seems to me if the real income of ordinary American workers were doubling every decade, there'd be far fewer complaints about the One Percent.

    Commenters who endlessly ridicule the absurd claims of the MSM on some matters should be more cautious in blindly believing it on other matters.

    I challenge you to find a funnier example or wishful thinking on China than at:

    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/chinas-twilight-years/480768/

    “Twilight years”. And soon they’ll have to open their borders…

    Read More
  58. @Ron Unz

    They can produce and implement as much propaganda and economic incentive as they want...They managed to implement a one child policy something that would be impossible to pass in a democratic country. China has demonstrated the ability to control human behavior. If they could pass a one child policy? Why can’t they pass economic incentives to have children.
     
    Yes, I think this is exactly correct. These days, China has a fairly non-ideological, pragmatic government which can implement those policies it believes are best for China and for the Chinese. Meanwhile, America and most Western countries suffer from exteme ideological constraints on these demographic issues.

    Western countries supposedly have a terrible "birth dearth," especially among the middle class, and therefore require heavy foreign immigration to prevent a sharp population decline. But this is obviously total nonsense.

    Suppose, for example, government raised the tax rates by 10 points on all adults over 30 who were not already married. Surely marriage rates would skyrocket, especially among those individuals who earned substantial incomes. Then suppose the government also raised tax rates by 10 points on all individuals over 35 who had no children and by 5 points among individuals with only one child. Once again, birth rates would surely skyrocket. Add to this strong, pro-natalist media/progaganda, and huge demographic changes would probably occur.

    Admittedly, such government policies would be unthinkable in America, not least because of their quasi-eugenic taint, but this is an ideological rather than a practical barrier.

    As an analogy, suppose there were a country whose very rapidly growing population was considered a catastrophe in the making, with the main factor being that birth control was totally prohibited and condemned, both by law and by moral sanction. As an outsider, you might suggest that changes in the birth control law might easily solve the problem, but any such proposal would be considered ideologically "impossible."

    Forty or fifty years ago, the Chinese government was far more ideological than its American counterpart, which led to all sorts of problems, but these days it is the American government which operates within a narrow ideological straightjacket.

    I think the reason China isn't too concerned about its low fertility rate is that the leadership believes, not without reason, that there are already plenty of Chinese and the country is probably somewhat overcrowded. Why would they want an exponentially growing population? Instead, per capita income has been growing exponentially.

    Meanwhile, exponential population growth (entirely driven by immigration) seems to be the goal of America's leadership, while per capita income has stagnated for the last 40 years.

    The Chinese leaders seem sensible and the American ones crazy.

    “China has demonstrated the ability to control human behavior”, says the reader you replied to.

    Does he know of some place where that is not the case? Is he/she reading and “watching” the USA-EU mainstream media af of late?

    Our current status of affairs comes from far in the past, at least 60 years.

    I pick one quote by one neuroscientists, one quote among countless quotes by Western, usually Anglo-Saxon, psychologists, psychiatrists, of the 20th century.

    “We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically manipulated. The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.”

    The 2 differences with China (and Russia) is their governors work for the good of their governed, and even liberty is going to find more space in their culture and society, whereas the West has slipped back to authoritarianism, and a menacious one at that: one in which the governers seem to loathe the governed, and work with all but their governed’s interest in their mind.
    ————–

    Coming to your point on fertility, I see what you say, but what about birth rates in South Korea/Japan?
    Besides, I have read they are steeply falling in the Muslimsphere too, as well as in Israel.

    Regardless, I can’t see anything “eugenicist” to such policies.

    ———————-
    “Forty or fifty years ago, the Chinese government was far more ideological than its American counterpart, which led to all sorts of problems, but these days it is the American government which operates within a narrow ideological straightjacket.”

    A naive observer would wonder why, if ideology and authoritarianism blight countries and hinder advancement, do governments allow themselves become ideological?

    But asking that question assumes free will, the free will of governments

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    Anglo Saxon psychologists and psychiatrists?
    Other than a few women feminists,I've never seen one AS psych.
    Its a Jewish field,with a few Indians now entering it.
    And they have a full crop of lunatics to work with here,all supporting the hell bitch.
  59. @Talha
    Good points! Mormons are a special case though (wouldn't you agree - I'm a Muslim and had the easiest time getting along with traditional Mormons in high school) - I would put them in the same archetype as the traditional Chinese I was talking about. But city-dwelling (post)modern minded whites or Chinese don't fit this mold. I guess we'll see, but I do pray for what's best for the Chinese people.

    Also, on your point about Chinese policy vis-a-vis Islam; Islam is an very old force in China (UR contributor Razib Khan has written some excellent stuff), and it seems the pragmatic Chinese deal with different Muslims differently:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/02/world/asia/china-islam-hui-ningxia.html?_r=0
    http://time.com/3099950/china-muslim-hui-xinjiang-uighur-islam/
    http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/harmony-and-martyrdom-among-chinas-hui-muslims

    Peace.

    http://www.economist.com/news/china/21662592-article-looks-sharp-rise-young-chinese-happy-live-themselves-next-old

    Maybe you had already read that news, or guessed it on your own; if so, you guessed very right.
    Life style and ambitions of young Chinese in China’s big cities is shifting very quickly to Western, “postmodern” model. 30% live alone in the most “advanced” areas, and many want to do the same as soon as they can.

    Read More
  60. Historian says:
    @Hbd investor
    I don't think empty wombs will be a problem

    The Chinese government has absolute power, and lack of morals.

    If empty wombs are a problem the ccp would solve it immediately by offering tax cuts to the families with children and implementing pregnancy leaves along with propaganda to have more children.

    The reason why China's population exploded from 200 million at the end of ww2 to 1.4 billion was because Mao believed that ww3 was coming and they needed as many people as possible to increase their chances of winning a nuclear war.

    If the Communists could create 1.2 billion people with a snap of a finger there is no reason why they can't do it again

    The reason why China’s population exploded from 200 million at the end of ww2 to 1.4 billion was because Mao believed that ww3 was coming and they needed as many people as possible to increase their chances of winning a nuclear war.

    If the Communists could create 1.2 billion people with a snap of a finger there is no reason why they can’t do it again

    The population of China at the end of World War II was over 500 million, although nobody knew this at the time. When the Communists took their first census, they were surprised to discover that they ruled 583 million people.

    The population had just cracked 1 billion when the one-child policy was put into place.

    That’s an increase of 400 million, not 1.2 billion.

    Read More
  61. 5371 says:
    @Hbd investor
    I don't think empty wombs will be a problem

    The Chinese government has absolute power, and lack of morals.

    If empty wombs are a problem the ccp would solve it immediately by offering tax cuts to the families with children and implementing pregnancy leaves along with propaganda to have more children.

    The reason why China's population exploded from 200 million at the end of ww2 to 1.4 billion was because Mao believed that ww3 was coming and they needed as many people as possible to increase their chances of winning a nuclear war.

    If the Communists could create 1.2 billion people with a snap of a finger there is no reason why they can't do it again

    Nope. China’s population was about 500 million at the end of WW2, and it grew rapidly due not to a rise in the birth rate but to a rapid improvement in public health

    Read More
    • Replies: @dcite
    As everywhere that utilized "western conveniences" like hot and cold running water, flush toilets, a controlled sewage system, and public health practitioners. Populations grow fast and incrementally when 6 out of a family's 6 children survive, compare to two out of six.
  62. RolfDan says:

    Any intellectual explosion comes from a dam breaking. A population that has been separate before, but is highly educated, suddenly breaks the dam and transforms everything in its path.

    Christians in Europe started the proto-universities of Europe. Studying scripture sharpened their minds, and eventually the dam broke and the love of learning spread into the secular world, with associated scientific revolutions.

    The same happened with the Islamic golden age. And from the 19th century, there has been a Jewish wave. The dam was broken by Jewish Emancipation, and all those centuries of Torah study had prepared the Jews for the secular world of ideas.

    The Chinese dam is breaking with its opening up to the west, as the Japanese did after WW2. Like the previous waves this will change all of us, but will also fade in a century or two. Perhaps a North Korean wave will occur soon.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus

    Studying scripture sharpened their minds, and eventually the dam broke and the love of learning spread into the secular world, with associated scientific revolutions.
     
    The West and especially whatever it is that passes for Christianity and Catholicism today would do well to get over its erroneous belief that scripture -- by which I assume you mean Old and New Testaments -- was such a singularly important and major source of scholarship and learning. Cicero (106 - 43 BC), Virgil (70 - 19 BC), Livy (59 BC – AD 17), Ovid (43 BC - 17 AD), Plutarch (46 - 120 AD), among others, produced writing that pre-dated or coincided with the Vulgate and that influenced European thought-leaders and academics.
  63. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Maybe there is a connection to the low birthrates among Reform Jewish women.

    Liberalism and feminism are self-limiting, luckily.

    Read More
    • Replies: @pickwickcircle24
    All anti-natural attitudes are self-limiting, as long as the stage is that of nature (we may be approaching a technohuman era).
    , @dahoit
    Same with homosexuals,except lesbians go to the sperm bank of the male homosexuals,and procreate more homosexuals.Oy!My daddy was a test tube,and my mommy a navel gazer.
    What could be more illuminating on the banality of evil,fulfillment at child's expense.
  64. kiismerh says:
    @Hacienda
    There is a growing gap between the West and the East. This is exhibit A.

    Asians know the West deeply and well. And this understanding is increasing, even to places where Asians know more about the West than the westerners themselves. OTOH, westerners still know next to nothing about Asians and are descending into hand waving, pardon me's, and throwaway judgements.

    Just take my word for it, Korean comedy and humour can be subtle and funny as any comic hero in the US- Woody Allen, Seinfeld, Steve Martin, etc. You're blithering ignorant.

    1. You are obviously Korean and think that you have a great sense of humor both as an individual and as a nation.
    2. You seem to think since that is what you learned from the Western media that Woody Allen and Seinfeld are the epitomes of a sophisticated sense of humor. “Just take my word for it”, they are very far from that. (I don’t know Steve Martin)

    I know I can’t convince you that you are wrong on both accounts that is why I had to steal quoted line from your message. If I could than I would be able to teach you a sense of humor as well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hacienda
    If I could than I would be able to teach you a sense of humor as well.

    --------

    Who do you consider funny? I find peak Woody Allen and Seinfeld to be very funny and among the most sophisticated comics with mass following. Steve Martin helped revolutionize American humor, took it out of the model of stand up one-liners and direct narrative. If you don't know Martin, you don't even understand American humor, leave alone Asian humor.

    , @Priss Factor
    "(I don’t know Steve Martin)"

    What planet have you been on?

    Martin had highs and lows.

    His highs are very high.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2pu0m9iTo4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7why8Xo_RQ

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpFNC7puU2M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1Hr9VPnMNc
  65. Lot says:
    @Hbd investor
    I don't think empty wombs will be a problem

    The Chinese government has absolute power, and lack of morals.

    If empty wombs are a problem the ccp would solve it immediately by offering tax cuts to the families with children and implementing pregnancy leaves along with propaganda to have more children.

    The reason why China's population exploded from 200 million at the end of ww2 to 1.4 billion was because Mao believed that ww3 was coming and they needed as many people as possible to increase their chances of winning a nuclear war.

    If the Communists could create 1.2 billion people with a snap of a finger there is no reason why they can't do it again

    If empty wombs are a problem the ccp would solve it immediately by offering tax cuts to the families with children and implementing pregnancy leaves along with propaganda to have more children.

    Has not worked in Han-majority Singapore. Tax cuts won’t work, taxes in China are not that high, and the country is still poor even no taxes would still mean their incomes are far below ultra low-fertility Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Singapore.

    Demographic momentum and dependency ratio is also very bad for China.

    Read More
  66. Lot says:

    Low birth rates and high intermarriage means the share of the US young population that is pure Ashkenazi but not anti-education ultra-Orthodox has probably dropped from about 4% in the 1930′s to 1950′s to 1.25% now.

    Read More
  67. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/china-hopes-to-land-on-mars-by-2020/article/2589252

    Where a non-minor point to be noted is th stress they lay on a wish to co-operate with the U.S.
    (it can be inferred they have received no responses up to now.)

    Read More
  68. @Anonymous
    Maybe there is a connection to the low birthrates among Reform Jewish women.

    Liberalism and feminism are self-limiting, luckily.

    All anti-natural attitudes are self-limiting, as long as the stage is that of nature (we may be approaching a technohuman era).

    Read More
  69. bossel says:
    @Ron Unz
    Actually, I think these critiques of China's prospects are just total MSM nonsense/propaganda, much like how the old USSR used to endlessly critique America's dreadful economic problems during the 1970s and 1980s.

    Sure, all the MSM headlines endlessly tout China's terrible "economic slowdown"...except that even during this so-called "slowdown" China's per capita GDP has been increasing at roughly 10x America's rate. Here's a handy chart from one of my old articles from a few years ago you might want to consider reading especially since none of the trends have changed all that much:



    http://www.unz.com/article/chinas-rise-americas-fall/

    The real income of urban Chinese workers has been doubling every 5-10 years. It seems to me if the real income of ordinary American workers were doubling every decade, there'd be far fewer complaints about the One Percent.

    Commenters who endlessly ridicule the absurd claims of the MSM on some matters should be more cautious in blindly believing it on other matters.

    ”…except that even during this so-called “slowdown” China’s per capita GDP has been increasing at roughly 10x America’s rate.

    Your chart only shows data till 2010. The slowdown only really started 2 or 3 years ago. I doubt that Chinese incomes are still doubling so quickly. They may still be growing overall (definitely not in all sectors of the economy), but not as fast as before.

    China has a fairly non-ideological, pragmatic government

    Again, not so much anymore. Xi Jinping is the most ideological leader the PRC had for a long time. Depends on how you define “fairly”, but under Xi it’s going quite rapidly backwards.

    implement those policies it believes are best for China and for the Chinese

    Mainly it implements those policies which help the CPC to stay in power.

    Surely marriage rates would skyrocket

    Similar measures as mentioned have been (partially in effect for a long time or recently) taken in several European countries. Hasn’t changed much.

    The Chinese leaders seem sensible

    Good one. The key word here is probably “seem”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ron Unz

    Your chart only shows data till 2010. The slowdown only really started 2 or 3 years ago.
     
    That's exactly why I emphasized that although the chart was slightly dated, the current trends are almost indistinguishable. Whereas urban Chinese incomes were doubling every 5 years at the peak a decade or so ago, now they're doubling about every 10 years. And per capita income growth in Chinese is indeed about 10x that in America, though you'd never guess that by reading MSM headlines. Bear in mind that per capita income growth in the U.S. has been quite low for many years.

    One of these days I'll get around to spending five minutes updating my chart...
  70. @Talha
    Hey HBDI,

    If you offered white women free daycare, schools free from violence and extra money, affordable housing you will get a baby boom.
     
    Of course we are in the realm of speculation here, but think of this; how many very wealthy White families (in the upcoming generation) do you know that can afford the best private schools for their kids and have no worries about finances that have more than 2 kids?

    You can try to control human behavior, but the will must be there. I would surmise it exists in the traditional Chinese, but not so sure about the city-dwellers.

    If they could pass a one child policy? Why can’t they pass economic incentives to have children.
     

    Preventing someone from doing something only requires will from one party, encouraging an action requires will from both - no?

    Again, this is all speculation, they may well be able to pull it off (seems MR. Unz feels that way), but I am skeptical.

    Peace.

    In the years immediately after war w/ Iraq, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary leadership implemented pro-reproduction policies very much like those that Ron described. Where do you think the population bubble of under-40s in Iran came from? While it is usually the case that a culture that experienced devastating losses in war would experience a subsequent decline in fertility (a situation that was deliberately exacerbated in Germany post-WWII), the IRI took deliberate measures to successfully counter that phenomenon.

    Iran invested in education, including education of women — college is state-subsidized for those who pass certain tests; 60% of university students are female. — also invested heavily in community health care, extended to Iran’s rural populations, where electrification and education were also prioritized.

    Iran has had ethnically diverse populations for centuries, but they are united around Islamic-inflected core Persian culture — in literature, language, architecture, art, and an awareness of their history. But whichever — ethnically diverse or culturally unified, Iranian women mated with Iranian men to produce Iranian children.

    Read More
    • Replies: @5371
    [it is usually the case that a culture that experienced devastating losses in war would experience a subsequent decline in fertility]

    WW1 in the west, yes, but the decline was already in full swing before the war started. All experience and logic would lead one to expect the opposite - quick breeding to repair the losses. In fact, the only case I can think of where a rapid fall in the fertility rate happened right after a destructive war is precisely Iran following 1988.
    , @No_0ne
    "Iran invested in education, including education of women"

    Are you claiming that increasing higher education for women is a PRO-fertility measure? Or am I misunderstanding you here? Because historically, the opposite certainly seems to be the case.
  71. dcite says:
    @5371
    Nope. China's population was about 500 million at the end of WW2, and it grew rapidly due not to a rise in the birth rate but to a rapid improvement in public health

    As everywhere that utilized “western conveniences” like hot and cold running water, flush toilets, a controlled sewage system, and public health practitioners. Populations grow fast and incrementally when 6 out of a family’s 6 children survive, compare to two out of six.

    Read More
  72. Ron Unz says:
    @bossel

    ”…except that even during this so-called “slowdown” China’s per capita GDP has been increasing at roughly 10x America’s rate.
     
    Your chart only shows data till 2010. The slowdown only really started 2 or 3 years ago. I doubt that Chinese incomes are still doubling so quickly. They may still be growing overall (definitely not in all sectors of the economy), but not as fast as before.

    China has a fairly non-ideological, pragmatic government
     
    Again, not so much anymore. Xi Jinping is the most ideological leader the PRC had for a long time. Depends on how you define "fairly", but under Xi it's going quite rapidly backwards.

    implement those policies it believes are best for China and for the Chinese
     
    Mainly it implements those policies which help the CPC to stay in power.

    Surely marriage rates would skyrocket
     
    Similar measures as mentioned have been (partially in effect for a long time or recently) taken in several European countries. Hasn't changed much.

    The Chinese leaders seem sensible
     
    Good one. The key word here is probably "seem".

    Your chart only shows data till 2010. The slowdown only really started 2 or 3 years ago.

    That’s exactly why I emphasized that although the chart was slightly dated, the current trends are almost indistinguishable. Whereas urban Chinese incomes were doubling every 5 years at the peak a decade or so ago, now they’re doubling about every 10 years. And per capita income growth in Chinese is indeed about 10x that in America, though you’d never guess that by reading MSM headlines. Bear in mind that per capita income growth in the U.S. has been quite low for many years.

    One of these days I’ll get around to spending five minutes updating my chart…

    Read More
  73. @RolfDan
    Any intellectual explosion comes from a dam breaking. A population that has been separate before, but is highly educated, suddenly breaks the dam and transforms everything in its path.

    Christians in Europe started the proto-universities of Europe. Studying scripture sharpened their minds, and eventually the dam broke and the love of learning spread into the secular world, with associated scientific revolutions.

    The same happened with the Islamic golden age. And from the 19th century, there has been a Jewish wave. The dam was broken by Jewish Emancipation, and all those centuries of Torah study had prepared the Jews for the secular world of ideas.

    The Chinese dam is breaking with its opening up to the west, as the Japanese did after WW2. Like the previous waves this will change all of us, but will also fade in a century or two. Perhaps a North Korean wave will occur soon.

    Studying scripture sharpened their minds, and eventually the dam broke and the love of learning spread into the secular world, with associated scientific revolutions.

    The West and especially whatever it is that passes for Christianity and Catholicism today would do well to get over its erroneous belief that scripture — by which I assume you mean Old and New Testaments — was such a singularly important and major source of scholarship and learning. Cicero (106 – 43 BC), Virgil (70 – 19 BC), Livy (59 BC – AD 17), Ovid (43 BC – 17 AD), Plutarch (46 – 120 AD), among others, produced writing that pre-dated or coincided with the Vulgate and that influenced European thought-leaders and academics.

    Read More
  74. 5371 says:
    @SolontoCroesus
    In the years immediately after war w/ Iraq, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary leadership implemented pro-reproduction policies very much like those that Ron described. Where do you think the population bubble of under-40s in Iran came from? While it is usually the case that a culture that experienced devastating losses in war would experience a subsequent decline in fertility (a situation that was deliberately exacerbated in Germany post-WWII), the IRI took deliberate measures to successfully counter that phenomenon.

    Iran invested in education, including education of women -- college is state-subsidized for those who pass certain tests; 60% of university students are female. -- also invested heavily in community health care, extended to Iran's rural populations, where electrification and education were also prioritized.

    Iran has had ethnically diverse populations for centuries, but they are united around Islamic-inflected core Persian culture -- in literature, language, architecture, art, and an awareness of their history. But whichever -- ethnically diverse or culturally unified, Iranian women mated with Iranian men to produce Iranian children.

    [it is usually the case that a culture that experienced devastating losses in war would experience a subsequent decline in fertility]

    WW1 in the west, yes, but the decline was already in full swing before the war started. All experience and logic would lead one to expect the opposite – quick breeding to repair the losses. In fact, the only case I can think of where a rapid fall in the fertility rate happened right after a destructive war is precisely Iran following 1988.

    Read More
  75. Hacienda says:
    @Anonymous
    I highly doubt someone would feel the need to tell somebody else they are "blithering ignorant", if they weren't at least a little ignorant (and maybe more), and if they had confidence in what they stated.

    I have known many Mongolian Asians, including Chinese, and confirm @kiismerh experience.

    Intelligent comes in many shapes, and they excel only at one kind of it, that I would call technical, engineer-istic. In that, they excel to a degree a Westerner is hardly going to imagine before he/she knows some.
    Your average Japanese shopkeeper can compute better than your average good student of mathematics in the West, and they have a huge knob for logic.

    While they are particularly weak in the field of creativity, imagination, and so forth: and incapable of grasping verbal analogies and jokes, or anything needing the smallest grain of imagination to an extent that can surprise a Westerner.

    This correlates a lot with their genetic tendency toward conformity, that is, in turn, reflected by their political systems and great stability (they also suffer from far more less psychic diseases and disturbances of the kind caused by high emotionability and stress).

    I don't, and I assume @kiismerh doesn't, need to "take your word for it" (who would take the word of someone who speaks by insults, by the way?), as I, and I assume he too, speak by experience.

    I’m Korean American and bilingual. Known Koreans and Americans all my life.
    So, unless you have a similar background, yes, take my word for it. Koreans don’t lack humor and they aren’t high functioning autistics. Humor is a deep thing that comes in all varieties, from all conditions, like music. I’m telling you, white humor is not always the best humor. Peak white American humor occurred early 20th century, sorry, it did. Now it’s all about transgenderism, apologetics to colored people, and geeky bitch’in. While this is funny too, it’s not the same. Just not.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    I'm a big fan of Japanese cinema from the 50s, 60s and 70s (not much exposure to Korean) and I know what you are talking about. The humor is subtle and different but it is definitely there and charming.

    Peace.
  76. OLD JEW says:
    @pickwickcircle24
    Only 5 or 6 instances of boasting.
    A little less than the habitual rate.

    Mirror mirror on the wall, who's the fairest of all?
    Of course they must be all A's: you don't want that mirror to return an offensive answer one day or another.

    Dear P.

    You make a salient point, a good point.

    Please forgive.

    My bias and prejudice show. In plain sight.

    Look at my pseudonym: besides being a Jew, I am also Old.

    Thus tend to look back 25 years ago thru rosy glasses.

    But notice, I did not mention MY school grades (way less to boast about)
    only my daughter’s and her friend.

    I remember, it irked me that those smart Asian kids ranked in the three top spots.

    Sorry,
    sf

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hacienda
    At my daughter's high school graduation, I heard the valedictory speech given by an Asian girl.
    Smart, witty, on point with precocious knowledge of current culture. Don't so irked, my man.
  77. Hacienda says:
    @kiismerh
    1. You are obviously Korean and think that you have a great sense of humor both as an individual and as a nation.
    2. You seem to think since that is what you learned from the Western media that Woody Allen and Seinfeld are the epitomes of a sophisticated sense of humor. "Just take my word for it", they are very far from that. (I don't know Steve Martin)

    I know I can't convince you that you are wrong on both accounts that is why I had to steal quoted line from your message. If I could than I would be able to teach you a sense of humor as well.

    If I could than I would be able to teach you a sense of humor as well.

    ——–

    Who do you consider funny? I find peak Woody Allen and Seinfeld to be very funny and among the most sophisticated comics with mass following. Steve Martin helped revolutionize American humor, took it out of the model of stand up one-liners and direct narrative. If you don’t know Martin, you don’t even understand American humor, leave alone Asian humor.

    Read More
    • Replies: @kiismerh
    I checked that Martin guy and he is completely infantile. No wonder you like him and confirm what I said before: Asian sense of humor is on the level of a 10 year old.

    Here are some example for sophisticated humor: P.G. Wodehouse, Gary Larson or for you probably surprisingly Mike Judge, creator of Beavis and Butt-Head.
  78. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website

    The thing you gotta understand about Chiners is they are snakes and weasels.

    Chinese businessmen are notorious for all kinds of dirty deeds.

    A Japper’s words have some value. Jappers developed honor by the culture of belly slitting via harakiri if someone did wrong. Chinese just lie and lie and lie and cheat and cheat and cheat. They have no sense of honor. Even Chinese morality like guanxi promotes corruption. I learned this in a college class on Chinese culture. Guanxi is essential to understanding Chinese mind. Good deeds hide corruption and trading favors.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guanxi

    Also, Chinese have combo of excessive arrogance(middle kingdom mentality) and excessive butthurt self-pity & rage. “Me so thorny, me so thorny.”

    A thorny people indeed.

    At any rate, Chinese success IN America is individual, not collective. There is very weak sense of Chineseness among the Chinee-Americans whose main culture is pop culture, rap, comics, hollywood. Most Chinee-Amers I know worship negroes in the NBA over all else. That is their culture. Chinese study to go to good schools and make money. Not because they care about ideas and culture. Also, even if some Chinee go to elite schools and do well, your average Chinee-American don’t make it there. Indeed, due to anti-asian affirm action bias, you have to super-smart to make it into elite schools. Otherwise, your’e out. Not making it into elite is okay for Chinee girl because they still have ‘me so horny’ suzie womg appeal. But because the chinee male has such low market value in sexual competition, his failure to have extra success and fame means his life is that of loser geek with videogames(unless he gets a girl from China, but that is bad cuz China has a huge female deficit already).
    Chinee-American girls care only about personal happiness and that means choosing non-chinese mate like Amy Chua. She says in her book that Jewish-male(with meater) and Chinese female pairing is like the norm in elite circles.
    So, even if Chinese succeed as individuals, there is no collective glue among chinee. The most important bond of a people is male and female. Such doesn’t exist among Asian Americans. So, Chinee women provide wombs for others and Chinee men just work as drones and play video games all their lives.

    [MORE]

    In the end, even Mexers will win out over yelloids because they have more kids.

    Just look at the Jews. They also face reproductive problem.
    Reform Jews succeed more as individuals but too many don’t have kids or marry non-Jews or become lost in fashionable Liberalism(which has become batshit crazy).

    Pitfalls of secular Jewish culture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpmxApdVeuI

    When Jews lose God, they do funny things with power.

    Ortho Jews are less successful materially but they breed more and emphasize culture and identity. Money don’t create people. Pud and pooter(or cooter) do. Ortho Jews got union of Jewish pud and Jewish pooter.
    Through the ages, Jews had money, lost money, had money, lost money, and etc.
    But what held the Jewish community and identity together?
    Unity of Jewish men and Jewish women and remembrance of family and tribe through personal stories about family and Jewish history. In this sense, the Torah has more value than all the money in the world.
    If Jews lose all the money but have the Torah(and unity of the Jewish pud and Jewish poon), they survive and people and culture. But if Jews got all the money but ignore what they are and intermarry and raise their kids to be fashionably neurotic like Dunham or Sulkowicz, that’s the end.

    When I see Ortho Jewish families who are committed to culture and heritage, I’m inspired, though not with Hasidim who are too tardish with their silly hair.
    Among the orthos I can see and sense the deep connection between the father and his kibblers.

    In contrast, look at Lena Dunham and Emma Sulkowicz, the hybrid products of Jews who lost their way.

    It’s Decalogue Jews vs Golden Calf Jews.

    It’s Michael Medved Jews and Bob Dylan Jews vs Larry Kramer Jews and Andrea Dworkin Jews.

    In the end, the Decalogue Jews will outlast the Calfies.

    Go Moses.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Id6oS3L-D9A

    Read More
    • Replies: @Inque Yutani
    Ok, I'm ready to move to one of the offworld colonies.

    What? They're not thete yet? Oh.
    , @Equalizer
    Arrogance and speak with fork tongue: White people, right? Your insights are short sighted and biased.
  79. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @dcite
    More or less true; however, Asians are coming here and not so much the other way round, although there are a fair number of Asiaphiles who would be in Asia if they allowed more whites to settle there, although probably not in the millions. I wanted very much to live in France when I was in college, but when I heard that the French themselves had a hard time finding jobs, I gave that up -- I'd never want to take a French job from a French person.
    So no matter how much "schadenfreude" the commenters manifest, it is not "pure." They have a point. Asians are coming here to be, more or less, Americans. Americans don't go there to be Chinese or Koreans or Taiwanese in any numbers. They go to sell stuff -- a religion, a factory. No white person thinks he or she could become a Japanese or an Indian. At best,you'd be a pretender, a sympathizer. At least "American" is generic these days, but there are those who still consider their ethnic labels exclusive to themselves.
    So what are we supposed to think? An awful lot want to be here, and even more would be here if they could. It leads Americans (at least the white kind) to unflattering speculation and self-reverential comparisons. Asians have the same range of creativity, humor, etc. as whites, but we don't understand much about their cultures. There are reasons that "western" modern society has become the default, and reasons for those whose immediate ancestors created it, to be proud of its more attractive aspects. That may be what certain commenters are trying to express. Asians are very aware of themselves as Asians, yet white natives are not even supposed to notice or care. You sort of wonder why they come; America peaked in the 60s, before there was a huge Asian presence. Computers and the internet (a DARPA project begun for the Pentagon in the late 60s) were already part of the warp and the woof. You sort of wonder why all these people don't just stay put and make their own countries their version of America, if they want that so much. And if they can't create another America, well, then that does mean we're "superior." There's a ready made America for them. Why spend 100 years creating another one. And so it goes on and on.

    Asians want to come here because of the money. It’s not culture that drives people here, be it asians or others.

    If whites immigrate somewhere en mass, it will be because somewhere else offers them better economic opportunity, not because of cultural reasons. You travel some place to experience the culture, you don’t move.

    It used to be that America was rich because of the hard work of its people, now America is mainly rich because of momentum and dollar hedgemony. Both of which are becoming unwound.

    So a lot of Fred observed is based on whites just grasping for straws of how da chinaman’s success is just smoke and mirrors and China will crumble.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dcite
    Mostly money, but that's not enough reason nowadays, to explain it. Many are refugees from various kinds of cultural oppression -- including some academics. But this "oppression" is not peculiar to Asians.
    The "culture" here is not all that different from developed parts of Asia at this point in history -- and most come from developed areas. They are not peasants or street sweepers. Even in their own countries they are already more like us culturally, than we are like them. And yeah, I know that the similarity is sometimes surface and not representative of remote areas, but in general it is true comparatively, and it is what they feared for several centuries.
    T.F. Mou, Chinese horror movie director, made a film about Unit 731, "Men Behind the Sun," the infamous Japanese concentration camp in northern China from which perhaps half a dozen out of thousands of hapless Chinese, emerged alive. In casting, he chose rural Koreans to play the Chinese because the faces, body language, general mein and manner, were simply too changed, he claimed, from the way Chinese would have looked and acted in the 1940s. This change didn't just come from the marrow of their own bones. It came from elsewhere.

    Again: Asians can become generic Americans, Americans cannot become Chinese or Japanese. This is a choice. I do like a lot of Asian Americans -- often good American citizens. I don't see China crumbling. It'll just go on like all countries do. I wish it well so that more its citizens stay where they are (I wish the same for every country, btw), but I'd like to see material production return here. However, economic primacy in any given area, goes in cycles, and they probably have peaked already.

  80. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Anonymous
    I highly doubt someone would feel the need to tell somebody else they are "blithering ignorant", if they weren't at least a little ignorant (and maybe more), and if they had confidence in what they stated.

    I have known many Mongolian Asians, including Chinese, and confirm @kiismerh experience.

    Intelligent comes in many shapes, and they excel only at one kind of it, that I would call technical, engineer-istic. In that, they excel to a degree a Westerner is hardly going to imagine before he/she knows some.
    Your average Japanese shopkeeper can compute better than your average good student of mathematics in the West, and they have a huge knob for logic.

    While they are particularly weak in the field of creativity, imagination, and so forth: and incapable of grasping verbal analogies and jokes, or anything needing the smallest grain of imagination to an extent that can surprise a Westerner.

    This correlates a lot with their genetic tendency toward conformity, that is, in turn, reflected by their political systems and great stability (they also suffer from far more less psychic diseases and disturbances of the kind caused by high emotionability and stress).

    I don't, and I assume @kiismerh doesn't, need to "take your word for it" (who would take the word of someone who speaks by insults, by the way?), as I, and I assume he too, speak by experience.

    This is just the same tired old yarn white people keep spinning.

    That Asians are drones who are only good at taking tests and whites are wonderful creative types who are all busy inventing ipods.

    First of all, a lot of the “spark” you see from white people comes from Jewish white people. Not your common white you see walking around. Einstein, Seinfeld, Spielberg are all Jewish.

    Remove Jews from the white population and your creative narrative falls apart considerably.

    Second, as mentioned in the article, the types of Jews who contributed a lot to Science and to the Arts has diminished a lot as Ashkenazi Jews have either intermarriage or produced below the replacement rate. Low IQ Orthodox Jews are the ones who have been breeding and will replace the smart Jews.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bunga
    Did industrialization happen ? Who invented calculus, higher algebra, atoms,Periodic table, radiation -x rays, provided optics light ,nature of waves, invented engines and started motorized travel aero space, produced cheap farming or sailing or boating lost goes on and on.
    Don't see Jewish there until 20th century .
    , @martin_2
    There are 1.3 billion Chinese. There are roughly 50 million English. The average IQ of the Chinese is around 105, English is around 100. Yet I cannot think of one living Chinese mathematician or physicist of such renown as Roger Penrose, Stephen Hawking, Andrew Miles, John Conway, Alan Baker, Ben Green; except for Terence Tao.
    There must be something genetic going on.
    , @Karl
    > Low IQ Orthodox Jews

    They are well represented in selective units - Air Force & Intelligence.

    The really hardcore ones marry quite early. You can get them into the IDF, but you have to have special units with no ancillary women (clerks, cooks, drivers, etc) present. Their wives don't want them near TelAviv girls.....


    It's do-able. They just stood-up an ultra-orthodox battalion of Paratroopers to accommodate the yeshiva boys who want the extra pay that comes with being combat-rated.
  81. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:

    http://www.soiledsinema.com/?zx=30698f8f70edf8d7

    Neurosis can make for interesting individuality but not lasting cultural identity.

    It’s as if Reform Jews or Post-Jews have adopted neurosis as the new Jewish identity.

    A people overly obsessed with the odd and new but indifferent to the old and true are bound to get lost.

    This Jewish promotion of homo agenda seems like a projective institutionalization of the neurotic and odd as the new American identity.

    Tattoos and butt-banging as the new Americanism via Jewish culture of neurosis. Where will all this lead?

    Read More
  82. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Jews have diminshed, because in the past Jews had to create something of value I’m order to make it in life. Hence the high art and science achievements.

    Now that Jews run America like the mafia does, Jews have more guaranteed avenues of success that don’t require much from them. Jews now run the media, finance, law, Ivy Leagues etc. And once your in you don’t have to worry about producing so much since what you produced isn’t why you got your position in the first place.

    It is easier to let the goyim build a business for you and then just copy it or buy them out using a hedge fund. This is what Zuckerberg and the Google guys did, whereas in the past they would have had to do it all themselves.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "Jews have diminshed, because in the past Jews had to create something of value I’m order to make it in life. Hence the high art and science achievements."

    Jews are now more powerful than ever.

    But money and books and real estate and etc don't create new life.

    A man with a billion dollars who has no kids is rich only for one lifetime.

    A man with thousand dollars who has 5 kids pass down a living culture.

    Of course, Jews do have children, and 1/2 Jew kid is reliably Jewish.

    1/4 Jew kid too maybe.

    But a 1/8 or 1/16 Jew kid?

    Anthony Weiner's kid is gonna be less reliably Jewish.

    Still, Jews are still out-performing most groups in most stuff.

    Even if Jewish intellectual and cultural achievements are diminished compared to the past, they have no competition... except from blacks in rap but Jews control music industry.

    PC is controlled by Jews. As Asians are teacher's pets, they just follow PC.
    Jews and Asians have same politics in the US, but Jews shape it whereas Asians just follow it.

    The danger for Jews is that the logic of PC might end up boomeranging on them.
    It could lead to POC seeing Jews as part of 'white privilege' and seeing Zionism as part of 'racism'.
    Homos are most reliable ally of Jews, but what if homos side with BDS one of these days?

    There is now a homo civil war between Jewish/white homos who support Israel and diverse-ass-homos who stick up for Palestine.

    Lib Jews staked their reputation on Jewish nationalism(support for Israel) and proggy politics.

    But many Jews are now pressured to choose one or the other.

    Jews like philip weiss have chosen proggyism while some Jews harden into ardent Zionists.

    With total victory of proggyism and diversityism over whites in media and academia, many POC are less riled about 'white evil'.

    They are more into fighting over spoils of victory that seem to disproportionately in hands of Jews. And Jews are increasingly on the defensive, esp as POC cannot be silenced by invoking 'racism'.

  83. Hacienda says:
    @OLD JEW
    Dear P.

    You make a salient point, a good point.

    Please forgive.

    My bias and prejudice show. In plain sight.

    Look at my pseudonym: besides being a Jew, I am also Old.

    Thus tend to look back 25 years ago thru rosy glasses.

    But notice, I did not mention MY school grades (way less to boast about)
    only my daughter's and her friend.

    I remember, it irked me that those smart Asian kids ranked in the three top spots.

    Sorry,
    sf

    At my daughter’s high school graduation, I heard the valedictory speech given by an Asian girl.
    Smart, witty, on point with precocious knowledge of current culture. Don’t so irked, my man.

    Read More
  84. Talha says:
    @Hacienda
    I'm Korean American and bilingual. Known Koreans and Americans all my life.
    So, unless you have a similar background, yes, take my word for it. Koreans don't lack humor and they aren't high functioning autistics. Humor is a deep thing that comes in all varieties, from all conditions, like music. I'm telling you, white humor is not always the best humor. Peak white American humor occurred early 20th century, sorry, it did. Now it's all about transgenderism, apologetics to colored people, and geeky bitch'in. While this is funny too, it's not the same. Just not.

    I’m a big fan of Japanese cinema from the 50s, 60s and 70s (not much exposure to Korean) and I know what you are talking about. The humor is subtle and different but it is definitely there and charming.

    Peace.

    Read More
  85. kiismerh says:
    @Hacienda
    If I could than I would be able to teach you a sense of humor as well.

    --------

    Who do you consider funny? I find peak Woody Allen and Seinfeld to be very funny and among the most sophisticated comics with mass following. Steve Martin helped revolutionize American humor, took it out of the model of stand up one-liners and direct narrative. If you don't know Martin, you don't even understand American humor, leave alone Asian humor.

    I checked that Martin guy and he is completely infantile. No wonder you like him and confirm what I said before: Asian sense of humor is on the level of a 10 year old.

    Here are some example for sophisticated humor: P.G. Wodehouse, Gary Larson or for you probably surprisingly Mike Judge, creator of Beavis and Butt-Head.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hacienda
    I think you're too categorical in your thinking. Kind of like the snobs who say any music that is classical must be superior to any music that is pop when there are clunkers in classical music and brilliant pop music.

    Steve Martin is not infantile. It takes an a remarkable amount of effort and balls for an intelligent grown white male in that time to be as ridiculous as he was. He's stated that it took ten years of hard work and refining for him to develope his act until he got to the level he did. The acceptance of his humor opened the doors for lesser comedians like Steve Kaufman, Pee Wee Herman. Heralded the arrival of Saturday Night Live.

    PG Wodehouse, I haven't read. Gary Larsen is geeky humor and funny, but there is no objective measure that says he's more sophisticated than the comics of "무한 도전" which relies upon cultural awareness and precise physical and verbal timing of the team members.

  86. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website
    @kiismerh
    1. You are obviously Korean and think that you have a great sense of humor both as an individual and as a nation.
    2. You seem to think since that is what you learned from the Western media that Woody Allen and Seinfeld are the epitomes of a sophisticated sense of humor. "Just take my word for it", they are very far from that. (I don't know Steve Martin)

    I know I can't convince you that you are wrong on both accounts that is why I had to steal quoted line from your message. If I could than I would be able to teach you a sense of humor as well.

    “(I don’t know Steve Martin)”

    What planet have you been on?

    Martin had highs and lows.

    His highs are very high.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2pu0m9iTo4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7why8Xo_RQ

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpFNC7puU2M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1Hr9VPnMNc

    Read More
    • Replies: @kiismerh
    I am European. Was able to watch only the first two of your links. If there was a sense of humor quotient something similar to IQ, yours would definitely be below 100. Sorry.
  87. Hacienda says:
    @kiismerh
    I checked that Martin guy and he is completely infantile. No wonder you like him and confirm what I said before: Asian sense of humor is on the level of a 10 year old.

    Here are some example for sophisticated humor: P.G. Wodehouse, Gary Larson or for you probably surprisingly Mike Judge, creator of Beavis and Butt-Head.

    I think you’re too categorical in your thinking. Kind of like the snobs who say any music that is classical must be superior to any music that is pop when there are clunkers in classical music and brilliant pop music.

    Steve Martin is not infantile. It takes an a remarkable amount of effort and balls for an intelligent grown white male in that time to be as ridiculous as he was. He’s stated that it took ten years of hard work and refining for him to develope his act until he got to the level he did. The acceptance of his humor opened the doors for lesser comedians like Steve Kaufman, Pee Wee Herman. Heralded the arrival of Saturday Night Live.

    PG Wodehouse, I haven’t read. Gary Larsen is geeky humor and funny, but there is no objective measure that says he’s more sophisticated than the comics of “무한 도전” which relies upon cultural awareness and precise physical and verbal timing of the team members.

    Read More
  88. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website

    http://www.ancient-origins.net/history/surprising-japanese-interpretation-lost-years-jesus-christ-006023

    “Some Japanese researchers think that Jesus’ history is different from what is generally believed. This alternative version of Christ’s story was forgotten until 1935, when Kiyomaro Takeuchi (Takenouchi) reportedly discovered an ancient document in Ibaraki Prefecture in Japan. The text of the manuscript presented a shocking tale. It says that Jesus was buried in Herai Village in the Aomori district in Japan.”

    Human mind is limitless in its nuttery.

    But perhaps, instead of just dismissing nutty claims, we should value the insights they offer as to how the human mind works.
    Even nutty stuff yield secrets to to the tendencies of the mind.

    This is the decisive key to Jewish power.

    Some people will see or hear something stupid and just dismiss it.

    In contrast, Jews will ponder why the human mind can fall for dumbass or nutty stuff. This will lead to secrets of how the mind operates and how it can be manipulated.

    So, if someone like Richard Dawkins says ‘religion is wrong and stupid’ and totally rejects it, Jews will delve into how humans with power of reason could nevertheless believe in fantasy. Consider Spielberg’s neo-Christo fable with ET. Incredibly, he made countless kids worship and weep over an androgynous walking turd from outerspace that munches on reeses pieces. He knew what imagistic and emotional buttons to push. Spielberg is much bigger than Dawkins.

    If culture snobs will just dismiss trash as low culture, Jews will wonder why so many people are addicted to trashy stuff.

    And if you learn the secrets, you can formulate means to control the entire masses.

    After all, the homo agenda was not spread through rational debate or factualism.

    [MORE]

    It was proglytized (prog-proselytized) with fanfare and hype like the Catholic Church used to do.

    The masses were fanta-fudged into worshiping the homo. Homo agenda is not about a social acceptance of homos but about neo-spiritual celebration of homos as angels.

    Smart individuals often reject untrue or stupid stuff and just live in their own world. Like traditional Episcopalians. They may have privilege but they have no power over masses whom they sneer at.

    Dumb masses often accept nonsense and stupid stuff.

    Smart individuals who crave power(many Jews) need to sway the dumb masses, and so they look to nonsense and stupid stuff(that has great appeal to the masses) for clues as to what is most appealing to the masses.
    Thus, they formulate the clues into a strategy of mass control via the manipulative art.

    It’s like you gotta rummage through the shit or garbage to really understand what appeals to the consumptive habits of people.
    You gotta examine the waste to determine the taste.

    It’s no wonder Jews and not Episcopalian Brahmins of the East Coast came to dominate American movie culture.
    If you hold your nose above the shit, you won’t make the hit.

    If you want to fund astronomy, make money by selling astrology.
    If you know how most human mind works, you know astrology is more effective in manipulating the masses than astronomy is.

    Homo Agenda was more about ass-trology than ass-tronomy.

    Fact of ass-tronomy is some men are born to indulge do sodomic-buggering.
    Not very appealing.

    In contrast…

    Faith in ass-trology is that homos and trannies are like rainbow angels.
    Oh, that is so fun and rapturous.

    Read More
  89. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:
    @Anonymous
    Jews have diminshed, because in the past Jews had to create something of value I'm order to make it in life. Hence the high art and science achievements.

    Now that Jews run America like the mafia does, Jews have more guaranteed avenues of success that don't require much from them. Jews now run the media, finance, law, Ivy Leagues etc. And once your in you don't have to worry about producing so much since what you produced isn't why you got your position in the first place.

    It is easier to let the goyim build a business for you and then just copy it or buy them out using a hedge fund. This is what Zuckerberg and the Google guys did, whereas in the past they would have had to do it all themselves.

    “Jews have diminshed, because in the past Jews had to create something of value I’m order to make it in life. Hence the high art and science achievements.”

    Jews are now more powerful than ever.

    But money and books and real estate and etc don’t create new life.

    A man with a billion dollars who has no kids is rich only for one lifetime.

    A man with thousand dollars who has 5 kids pass down a living culture.

    Of course, Jews do have children, and 1/2 Jew kid is reliably Jewish.

    1/4 Jew kid too maybe.

    But a 1/8 or 1/16 Jew kid?

    Anthony Weiner’s kid is gonna be less reliably Jewish.

    Still, Jews are still out-performing most groups in most stuff.

    Even if Jewish intellectual and cultural achievements are diminished compared to the past, they have no competition… except from blacks in rap but Jews control music industry.

    PC is controlled by Jews. As Asians are teacher’s pets, they just follow PC.
    Jews and Asians have same politics in the US, but Jews shape it whereas Asians just follow it.

    The danger for Jews is that the logic of PC might end up boomeranging on them.
    It could lead to POC seeing Jews as part of ‘white privilege’ and seeing Zionism as part of ‘racism’.
    Homos are most reliable ally of Jews, but what if homos side with BDS one of these days?

    There is now a homo civil war between Jewish/white homos who support Israel and diverse-ass-homos who stick up for Palestine.

    Lib Jews staked their reputation on Jewish nationalism(support for Israel) and proggy politics.

    But many Jews are now pressured to choose one or the other.

    Jews like philip weiss have chosen proggyism while some Jews harden into ardent Zionists.

    With total victory of proggyism and diversityism over whites in media and academia, many POC are less riled about ‘white evil’.

    They are more into fighting over spoils of victory that seem to disproportionately in hands of Jews. And Jews are increasingly on the defensive, esp as POC cannot be silenced by invoking ‘racism’.

    Read More
  90. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website

    Japanese national character is more like northern Europe.

    Chinese national character is more like southern Europe.

    Some Chinese in Italy:

    http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/italy-crackdown-chinese-community-violent-40278754

    —-On Friday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said the Chinese embassy and consulate had lodged a complaint with Italy, “urging it to carry out civilized law enforcement and fair investigation” while protecting the rights and safety of Chinese citizens in Italy.—-

    Like I said, Chinese are like snakes and weasels.

    They bash Tibetans real good but talk about ‘civilized law enforcement’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @DB Cooper
    Nothing bash the Tibetans like the Indians.

    India invaded and annex a part of Tibet in 1951 and still brutally occupy it to this day. The area include Tawang, birthplace of the Sixth Dalai Lama and home to one of the holiest Tibetan monasteries. There are laws allowing the Indian government to detain or even kill any locals there. The law is called AFSPA. Tibetans and other Northeasterners in India are regularly taunted with racial slurs from the Indians. Some even got killed because they 'look Chinese'.

    That allegations of Tibetans are oppressed under Chinese rule is a MSM construct. Go there and talk to the local Tibetans in China. It is not what you think.
  91. bunga says:
    @Anonymous
    This is just the same tired old yarn white people keep spinning.

    That Asians are drones who are only good at taking tests and whites are wonderful creative types who are all busy inventing ipods.

    First of all, a lot of the "spark" you see from white people comes from Jewish white people. Not your common white you see walking around. Einstein, Seinfeld, Spielberg are all Jewish.

    Remove Jews from the white population and your creative narrative falls apart considerably.

    Second, as mentioned in the article, the types of Jews who contributed a lot to Science and to the Arts has diminished a lot as Ashkenazi Jews have either intermarriage or produced below the replacement rate. Low IQ Orthodox Jews are the ones who have been breeding and will replace the smart Jews.

    Did industrialization happen ? Who invented calculus, higher algebra, atoms,Periodic table, radiation -x rays, provided optics light ,nature of waves, invented engines and started motorized travel aero space, produced cheap farming or sailing or boating lost goes on and on.
    Don’t see Jewish there until 20th century .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The Chinese had their run too where they invented a lot, so did the Indians.

    Non Jewish whites are largely invisible now when it comes to cultural or Scientific impact. Common whites have neither the brain power nor the cultural traits to contribute anything of value.
  92. kiismerh says:
    @Priss Factor
    "(I don’t know Steve Martin)"

    What planet have you been on?

    Martin had highs and lows.

    His highs are very high.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2pu0m9iTo4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7why8Xo_RQ

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpFNC7puU2M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1Hr9VPnMNc

    I am European. Was able to watch only the first two of your links. If there was a sense of humor quotient something similar to IQ, yours would definitely be below 100. Sorry.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "I am European... Sorry"

    French can't do physical comedy.

    German comedy? Where?

    There's a saying.

    "Hell is where Swedes do comedy."

    Only Brits, Italians, Jews,Jivers, and Hong-Kongers do good comedy.

    But the Dinner Game the French movie was funny as hell.

    And Kusterica is funny as hell.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmzDcNjWLqQ
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLNx-w7yBFk

  93. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:
    @kiismerh
    I am European. Was able to watch only the first two of your links. If there was a sense of humor quotient something similar to IQ, yours would definitely be below 100. Sorry.

    “I am European… Sorry”

    French can’t do physical comedy.

    German comedy? Where?

    There’s a saying.

    “Hell is where Swedes do comedy.”

    Only Brits, Italians, Jews,Jivers, and Hong-Kongers do good comedy.

    But the Dinner Game the French movie was funny as hell.

    And Kusterica is funny as hell.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmzDcNjWLqQ

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLNx-w7yBFk

    Read More
    • Replies: @5371
    Louis de Funès couldn't do physical comedy? Are you out of your mind?
  94. Svigor says:

    Another of my friends has an Asian wife and thus entree into the Asian community. He quotes their (wisely private) outlook: “Whites are lazy and stupid.”

    Perhaps, but Whites are obviously superior at creating countries that Yellows want to live in. Yellows are clever and industrious, but they’re also bland, conformist, and corrupt. We’d be wise to exclude them from our living spaces, ere Yellows make them as bland, conformist, and corrupt as their homelands.

    China is by far the world leader in high-speed rail, of which America has none.

    China needs advanced mass transit far more than we do. There’s a billion of them packed into an area roughly the size of the 13 colonies. And their ant-hill-like lack of diversity (sorry, a globalist spirit came over me for a moment) means they can actually enjoy whatever mass transit they devise.

    “Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don’t see it as a sign of low rank.”

    Jewry is the Galactic Headquarters for contempt for manual labor.

    The smartest Jews tend to be secular, and about half of secular Jews are marrying non-Jews, and most of the ones that do raise their kids non-Jewish. (1488 crowd shibboleths notwithstanding). When those kids grow up, they have some of the smart genes, (or all, if assortative mating is holding up). But they don’t have the Jewish label.

    What’s funny is how Jews either trumpet or bemoan this supposedly epic level of Jewish tolerance (depending on their audience), but it’s actually evidence of Jews’ relative intolerance; imagine if Irish Catholics or Anglo-Saxons or Italians in America only married other whites at that rate. The NYT would be on them like stink on shit. Jews are easily the most endogamous white group in America.

    Wilson: Jews got one idea about lots of stuff: whether White “gentiles” are worthy of the rights Jews have (they aren’t), whether it’s okay to promote destructive liberalism and open borders for White “gentiles” while promoting the opposite for Jews (it is), whether Israel should survive as a Jewish supremacist apartheid state (it should), etc., etc., etc.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    Remember the old joke about how many poles(12?) to screw in a light bulb?
    Well they never mention there were 24 Jews giving them conflicted info on how to do it.
    Jews are the worst manual workers in this world,manual labor is undesirable,and slaves do all their dirty work.
    Of course there are a few exceptions.
  95. Svigor says:

    Actually, I think these critiques of China’s prospects are just total MSM nonsense/propaganda, much like how the old USSR used to endlessly critique America’s dreadful economic problems during the 1970s and 1980s.

    Hmm. The Soviet critique of America depended wholly on the fact that America was an open society, and the USSR was a closed one; it’s easy to create a false narrative in that situation.

    Does China today seem more open and honest than America?

    Read More
  96. martin_2 says:
    @Anonymous
    This is just the same tired old yarn white people keep spinning.

    That Asians are drones who are only good at taking tests and whites are wonderful creative types who are all busy inventing ipods.

    First of all, a lot of the "spark" you see from white people comes from Jewish white people. Not your common white you see walking around. Einstein, Seinfeld, Spielberg are all Jewish.

    Remove Jews from the white population and your creative narrative falls apart considerably.

    Second, as mentioned in the article, the types of Jews who contributed a lot to Science and to the Arts has diminished a lot as Ashkenazi Jews have either intermarriage or produced below the replacement rate. Low IQ Orthodox Jews are the ones who have been breeding and will replace the smart Jews.

    There are 1.3 billion Chinese. There are roughly 50 million English. The average IQ of the Chinese is around 105, English is around 100. Yet I cannot think of one living Chinese mathematician or physicist of such renown as Roger Penrose, Stephen Hawking, Andrew Miles, John Conway, Alan Baker, Ben Green; except for Terence Tao.
    There must be something genetic going on.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "The average IQ of the Chinese is around 105"

    This is based on questionable data of elite kids in Shanghai.

    The regular Chiner's IQ is no higher than that of whitey.
    , @Anonymous
    There are not 50 million English with an IQ of 100. That is obviously a lie. There may be 50 million people in the UK, but they are all a mix of low IQ Muslims, Africans, and lower class whites mixed in with some exceptionally smart white people. A much smaller number than 50million of course.

    Also, the fact you haven't heard of the contributions from other cultures doesn't mean much either. Other countries like India and China are still emerging from agrarian societies. Also, Western institutions and media are biased in favor of their own kind. So I wouldn't place much on what some Englishman has heard.
    , @Crawfurdmuir

    ...I cannot think of one living Chinese mathematician or physicist of such renown as Roger Penrose, Stephen Hawking, Andrew Miles, John Conway, Alan Baker, Ben Green; except for Terence Tao. There must be something genetic going on.
     
    Elite English education, within the lifetimes of the men listed, was the best in the world. It was highly selective at an early age - not only the great "public" schools, but perhaps even more so, the grammar schools, which offered bright middle-class boys a similar quality of education. Those having the interest and ability could go on to Oxford or Cambridge, which follow the tutorial method, in which students receive individual instruction instead of just sitting through lectures with dozens or hundreds of others.

    While this (like other educational systems) produced many graduates of no great distinction, it was uniquely capable of identifying and cultivating the necessarily small number of its students who possessed first-rate intellects.

    An example of one who was not a mathematician was Enoch Powell, who famously went into an examination in Greek prose scheduled to last three hours, which set the task of translating a passage into Ancient Greek. He finished in an hour and a half, having produced two translations, one in the style of Thucydides and one in that of Plato. For this he won a rare double-starred first, and went on to become a professor of classics by the age of 25. When World War II broke out, he volunteered for service as a common soldier, and by the war's end had risen to the rank of brigadier. After the war he went into politics, and was stopped short of becoming prime minister only by his "Rivers of Blood" speech (which alluded to a passage in Virgil), then derided as "racist" but now appearing prophetic.

    American higher education, and higher education in most of the rest of the world, just doesn't cultivate such talents. Unfortunately, it is probable that neither does England's, any more.
  97. Svigor says:

    Far as I can tell, Chinese have that Arab/Jew/Wog thing, “either at your feet or at your throat,” when it comes to manual labor. That is, when they succeed, they’re quick to turn around and sneer at what’s “beneath” them, take a tone with their “inferiors,” etc. Not a whole lot of introspection. Obviously this is a human trait, but groups fall along the spectrum, and I don’t see much “noblesse oblige” in non-whites.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SFG
    You see it in silly lefty Ashkenazi Israeli publications like Haaretz.

    For that matter the whole left-wing social justice/tikkun olam thing does have a definite air of noblesse oblige about it. "We have suffered so now we must help those who are suffering," etc. The Jewish civil rights workers were never as badly off as the blacks they were trying to help. I was just reading Confederacy of Dunces (great book, BTW), set in New Orleans in the sixties, and while the black guy's cleaning the floors the Jewish couple owns the factory. (There's also a hilarious Jewish activist lady--you can see what lefties were like before the women realized the guys were taking advantage of 'free love' to mess around, and Ignatius Reilly definitely reminds me of Mencius Moldbug.)

    What's that you say? They should extend that noblesse oblige to poor whites as well? Especially ones who live in rural areas and get screwed by trade policy, moral collapse, and Section 8 v0uchers? Hey, you asked if it existed, not if it was actually good for society.
  98. martin_2 says:

    America is not the only white country. What about Europe? American comedy is absolutely chronic. They have no idea. The whole of human existence can be summed up in a selected half hour of Benny Hill. He was not Jewish. For recent cultural highs one needs to look at Russian twentieth century classical music, no Jews there to speak of.

    Read More
  99. Svigor says:

    I believe China is also the world leader in vacant high rise buildings. Maybe there is a need for high-speed rail in China that simply doesn’t exist in the U.S.

    This. It’s like the Chinese bragging about being the best at Chinese ink paintings, or Americans bragging about having the biggest and best baseball leagues. We can’t even find a real need for Amtrack, but we’re supposed to go all hot and heavy for high speed rail?

    I want my country to be the world leader in things that I actually admire in Asians, Jews, and others: the ability to preserve our ethnic genetic interests, keep our borders closed, and being impenetrable to critique by aliens.

    Read More
  100. Svigor says:

    I challenge you to find a funnier example or wishful thinking on China than at:

    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/chinas-twilight-years/480768/

    “Twilight years”. And soon they’ll have to open their borders…

    I have observed an overriding need among slaves to see others enslaved, among eunuchs to see all men gelded, etc.

    Read More
  101. DB Cooper says:
    @Priss Factor
    Japanese national character is more like northern Europe.

    Chinese national character is more like southern Europe.

    Some Chinese in Italy:

    http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/italy-crackdown-chinese-community-violent-40278754

    ----On Friday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said the Chinese embassy and consulate had lodged a complaint with Italy, "urging it to carry out civilized law enforcement and fair investigation" while protecting the rights and safety of Chinese citizens in Italy.----

    Like I said, Chinese are like snakes and weasels.

    They bash Tibetans real good but talk about 'civilized law enforcement'.

    Nothing bash the Tibetans like the Indians.

    India invaded and annex a part of Tibet in 1951 and still brutally occupy it to this day. The area include Tawang, birthplace of the Sixth Dalai Lama and home to one of the holiest Tibetan monasteries. There are laws allowing the Indian government to detain or even kill any locals there. The law is called AFSPA. Tibetans and other Northeasterners in India are regularly taunted with racial slurs from the Indians. Some even got killed because they ‘look Chinese’.

    That allegations of Tibetans are oppressed under Chinese rule is a MSM construct. Go there and talk to the local Tibetans in China. It is not what you think.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Okay, Chinese and Indians bash Tibetans real good.
    , @anonymous
    Complete nonsense. Why then does the Dalai Lama live in India, an entire town Dharamsala gifted to him and tens of thousands of his followers?
  102. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:
    @DB Cooper
    Nothing bash the Tibetans like the Indians.

    India invaded and annex a part of Tibet in 1951 and still brutally occupy it to this day. The area include Tawang, birthplace of the Sixth Dalai Lama and home to one of the holiest Tibetan monasteries. There are laws allowing the Indian government to detain or even kill any locals there. The law is called AFSPA. Tibetans and other Northeasterners in India are regularly taunted with racial slurs from the Indians. Some even got killed because they 'look Chinese'.

    That allegations of Tibetans are oppressed under Chinese rule is a MSM construct. Go there and talk to the local Tibetans in China. It is not what you think.

    Okay, Chinese and Indians bash Tibetans real good.

    Read More
  103. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:
    @martin_2
    There are 1.3 billion Chinese. There are roughly 50 million English. The average IQ of the Chinese is around 105, English is around 100. Yet I cannot think of one living Chinese mathematician or physicist of such renown as Roger Penrose, Stephen Hawking, Andrew Miles, John Conway, Alan Baker, Ben Green; except for Terence Tao.
    There must be something genetic going on.

    “The average IQ of the Chinese is around 105″

    This is based on questionable data of elite kids in Shanghai.

    The regular Chiner’s IQ is no higher than that of whitey.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Another example of wishful thinking from white people.

    You are probably talking about PISA scores which are related to IQ but might have some variability in selection.

    The Chinese IQ was not taken from a small sample size from elite Shanghai students.

    If anything I would call into question the IQ of white people today. With how much immigration and race mixing that has gone on in Western societies, and the devaluation of the intellect for the last 30 or so years, I wouldn't be surprised to see a big drop in white IQ.
  104. wow, I see that this article touched a very, very sensitive nerve.

    please write more of this fred. the frenzied responses from some of the commentators is eye opening.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    I don't know if Fred Fred Cabbage Head is really being sincere or trolling.

    His stuff about Mexican genius in every corner is funny as hell.
  105. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:
    @Astuteobservor II
    wow, I see that this article touched a very, very sensitive nerve.

    please write more of this fred. the frenzied responses from some of the commentators is eye opening.

    I don’t know if Fred Fred Cabbage Head is really being sincere or trolling.

    His stuff about Mexican genius in every corner is funny as hell.

    Read More
  106. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:

    In all this talk of Jews and Chiners, what about the Anglos?

    They are the ones who built US, Canada, and Australia that are controlled by Jews and filling up with Chiners.

    I think Australia and Canada better be more vigilant about Chiners as they do have the possibility of being overrun by them. Chiners have to deal with too much diversity and other groups to ever take power in the US.

    Anyway, what of the Anglos in this new system? What role will they play?

    And why did they lose out in the lands of their own creation?

    Maybe their very advantage had a huge weakness.

    The huge advantage of Anglos was principle, honor, and rule of law.

    But for those to work properly, a community has to be de-culture-ized. Rule of law must apply to all individuals. Principle means one has to favor stuff like meritocracy over one’s own kind. And honor means one must maintain dignity.

    Among themselves, these were good things to have. But those factors de-emphasized culture and kinship and heritage since laws must be fair and neutral to all.

    So, over time, Anglos lost their blood-and-guts identity.

    And when their nations were filled up with darkies and Jews, Anglos didn’t have the red blood and guts cultural tribal sense to fight and win. Their culture became golf club privilege and high-toned air of Bill Buckley.
    And if white people did dig into blood and guts, their enemies could invoke the very Anglo book of fairness and point out how ‘racist’ the Anglos were acting.

    So, Rule of Law and Neutral Justice are good things… but they turn people into bland individuals who are decultured and favor principles over blood and homeland. When such anemic people come in contact with red blooded folks, they lack the balls to fight and struggle.

    Jews learned the art/science of rule of law, but they never gave up their blood and guts cultural sense… and they esp regained it after the problems of communism, nazism, and Zionism.

    Communism taught socialist Jews that just being ‘worker of the world’ was dull and meaningless. While social justice is good, man needs culture and history and heritage.
    So, Jews found more satisfaction in Zionism that bound socialism with Jewish identity and culture.
    In some ways, Germans did same with National Socialism that bound Germanism with socialism. If Nazis had kept it national devoid of nasty chauvinism, it might have succeeded like Zionism. But Hitler was a racial chauvinist and imperialist. (It could be that the undoing of Zionism in the long run is its imperialist side. Occupation of West Bank is turning out costly. And Ziocon messing of the Middle East may lead to some long term disasters for Jews.)

    Anyway, rule of law and idea of justice are good and necessary but they are tools. They are weak as core culture and identity of a people.

    A Jew who feels as Jew and Zionist has meaning. But a Jew who rejects his identity and says, “I’m just for individual liberty and rule of law” has weak meaning.

    Tools are good and necessary but must not be mistaken with the person of blood and flesh they serve.

    After all, each person matters more as a blood-and-flesh product of family than any ideology he adopts.
    If ideology or ideas count the most in determining identity, then it means you are NOTHING unless you believe in something. What you believe counts more than your very existence.

    So, if you believe libertarianism is what counts most, a person who is not libertarian is not human and has no value. But in fact, a person’s worth remains intact regardless of what he believes.
    A Jew is no less a Jew for abandoning communism and adopting capitalism. He is still a Jew. His core identity is more than any ideology. This is why a Jew must put Jewishness and Zionism first before any ideology. He may adopt parts of ideologies to serve his Jewish interest. But the thing is to have the ideology to serve him and his people than to have him and his people serve an ideology as the endall of truth.

    Tools exist to serve humans, humans don’t exist to serve tools.
    Even Marx made this point. Economics must serve man. But capitalism too often makes us believe we exist to serve the economy.

    Economy must serve man and his nation.

    Globalism says ALL MEN must serve the economy of globalists.
    In the end, it means we all must serve the economy of Wall Street and Las Vegas.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The huge advantage of Anglos was divide and conquer, disregard of the human rights of non Anglos, and slavery.

    Anglos are best at dividing potential threats into pieces, and then getting them to attack each other while Anglos keep out of the frackas.

    While there Chinese visited the New World, they did not colonize or genocide the natives there. Whites killed them off and made them slaves.

    And this talk of justice, honor, rule of law, bla bla bla is just propaganda. This only applied to the people at the very top of those societies. Non anglos had none of these things, neither did non elite anglos save for a brief period of time in America.

    Nice try.
  107. Svigor says:

    AO: yellows do tend to have chips on their shoulders. Probably comes from finding white-created societies more appealing than the ones they create.

    Japanese accepted, God bless ‘em. They’re hard core racists, and as dishonest as any other yellow race, but at least they made their own country something to be admired, keep others out, and have no interest in infesting others’. And they make great cars.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ChaseBizzy
    As a thirty-something American white-gentile I have come to understand the complete and utter contempt the Japanese have for these high-IQ human locusts.
  108. SFG says:
    @Svigor
    Far as I can tell, Chinese have that Arab/Jew/Wog thing, "either at your feet or at your throat," when it comes to manual labor. That is, when they succeed, they're quick to turn around and sneer at what's "beneath" them, take a tone with their "inferiors," etc. Not a whole lot of introspection. Obviously this is a human trait, but groups fall along the spectrum, and I don't see much "noblesse oblige" in non-whites.

    You see it in silly lefty Ashkenazi Israeli publications like Haaretz.

    For that matter the whole left-wing social justice/tikkun olam thing does have a definite air of noblesse oblige about it. “We have suffered so now we must help those who are suffering,” etc. The Jewish civil rights workers were never as badly off as the blacks they were trying to help. I was just reading Confederacy of Dunces (great book, BTW), set in New Orleans in the sixties, and while the black guy’s cleaning the floors the Jewish couple owns the factory. (There’s also a hilarious Jewish activist lady–you can see what lefties were like before the women realized the guys were taking advantage of ‘free love’ to mess around, and Ignatius Reilly definitely reminds me of Mencius Moldbug.)

    What’s that you say? They should extend that noblesse oblige to poor whites as well? Especially ones who live in rural areas and get screwed by trade policy, moral collapse, and Section 8 v0uchers? Hey, you asked if it existed, not if it was actually good for society.

    Read More
  109. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominque Francon Society"] says:
    @Ivy
    Please enlighten us with a list of exemplars of Jewish prowess and manhood.

    Ron Jeremy

    Back in the 80s, a Jewish kid had a VCR and showed us one of his pa’s adult videos.

    Shiite, this Jeremy fella had a meater so long that he could suck his own dick.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Jews and Asians are like blacks and whites in sports.

    You see good number of whites in college level football and basketball, but when it comes to the pros, blacks totally dominate.

    Likewise, at college level, Asians have lot of firepower.
    But when it comes to true innovation and creativity after college, Jews dominate.

    Education is about mastering accumulated knowledge. It depends a lot on effort and practice. Asians can do that.

    But real achievement is about creating something new, thinking something no one did before, and going to where no man has gone before. It requires spark, inspiration(than mere perspiration).

    Asians are good at learning about everything in settled space.
    Jews are much better at discovering uncharted territories.
    , @Father O'Hara
    You never heard of that other guy,John Holmes?
  110. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominque Francon Society"] says:
    @Bee
    JJ Abrams has no respect for white gentiles? The vast majority of his characters are white gentiles, and he lovingly depicts a small mid-American town in his film Super 8 (and that was the one that was supposed to be '''''inspired by his childhood''''').

    He wants Kunta Kinte to screw the white girl in Star Schwarz.

    Read More
  111. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominque Francon Society"] says: • Website
    @Priss Factor
    Ron Jeremy

    Back in the 80s, a Jewish kid had a VCR and showed us one of his pa's adult videos.

    Shiite, this Jeremy fella had a meater so long that he could suck his own dick.

    Jews and Asians are like blacks and whites in sports.

    You see good number of whites in college level football and basketball, but when it comes to the pros, blacks totally dominate.

    Likewise, at college level, Asians have lot of firepower.
    But when it comes to true innovation and creativity after college, Jews dominate.

    Education is about mastering accumulated knowledge. It depends a lot on effort and practice. Asians can do that.

    But real achievement is about creating something new, thinking something no one did before, and going to where no man has gone before. It requires spark, inspiration(than mere perspiration).

    Asians are good at learning about everything in settled space.
    Jews are much better at discovering uncharted territories.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rdm
    You're comparing apples and oranges.

    Black dominates sport. But they don't know shit about strategy and game tactics. If you bet on King James, Kobe, etc etc shooting 2 points, 3 points all day long, you'd win for sure.

    Kobe can hit 85 points in a single game alone, nothing short of MVP qualities. But just group any Blacks into a team, and let them run on their own, you'd get a disaster.

    If you ask a Black linemen to run a mile, he will run like an Usain Bolt.

    Any strategy, long term game plan, Blacks miserably fail it.

    Blacks don't create the Basketball game, Blacks don't come up with football tactics. They use their body. That's it.

    On the other hand, East Asians create their own games and master them. East Asian create their own version of games.

    Look at this music.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85Fc2amPf34

    Would be highly valued in East Asia and emotionally cathartic to ears. But the value is just a paltry $0.02 cent.

    This? Uncle Sam allowance to Black community make it millions worth, and all the gibberish.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNkMfRjFZ6M
  112. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @bunga
    Did industrialization happen ? Who invented calculus, higher algebra, atoms,Periodic table, radiation -x rays, provided optics light ,nature of waves, invented engines and started motorized travel aero space, produced cheap farming or sailing or boating lost goes on and on.
    Don't see Jewish there until 20th century .

    The Chinese had their run too where they invented a lot, so did the Indians.

    Non Jewish whites are largely invisible now when it comes to cultural or Scientific impact. Common whites have neither the brain power nor the cultural traits to contribute anything of value.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    It doesn't matter.

    In the end, DQ or dick quotient will determine things.

    And in this Chinese fall short of whites, Jews, and esp the jaffers.

    In modern sexpot world, Chinee women are into me-so-horny mode.
    They lose virginity early to non-Asian men and 'don't want to go back.'
    Even bookworms like amy chua went non-chinee and in her book she says that is the norm in elite circles.

    Look how 50% of Chinee girl in the West give womb to non-Chinee men.
    They may be proud of Chinee cooking and culture but they are ashamed of chinee men or to have chinee men's kids.
    Their policy is Chinese Male Exclusion Act in their pooter. Their bedrooms have No Dogs and Chinese Males Allowed.

    These mixed race kid will imprint on non-Chinese man as father and figure of authority, thus cultural identity. They will see their mothers as having dumped inferior Chinee men for superior non-chinee man.

    So, who wins in the end? Brains don't create life. Puds do. And Chinee pud lose big in the DQ department esp in our porny world where girls are encouraged to loudly and publicly talk about dick, dick, dick like in sex and city.

    You come here with a brain filled with IQ but loin lacking in boing. Boing is Being.
    You read but no breed.
    Even a lowlife poor negro who humps ho's will produce kids but you won't produce any.

    Also, modern world calls for 'game'. For most of Chinee history, no game was required. Chinee men and Chinee were matched by parents.
    And then, China was closed to the world and all Chinee werevpoor under communism. So, Chinee women only had Chinee men. Since all people poor, they married on just human affection.

    But in the West, Chinee girl is not just content with human affection.. She's into fortune and success.
    Also, she can choose from all sorts of men and realize that Chinee men inferior in DQ and game.
    They are nerdy like this fella:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7z5YnUE-sME
    What a panda boy dork.

    So, you lose. You may read more but you breed less.
    And since Chinee men evolved in slavish society, they no got 'game' and so very lame.

    It's like the theory of the 3 C's.

    http://mygumbyisyours.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-three-cs.html
    , @kiismerh
    "Non Jewish whites are largely invisible now when it comes to cultural or Scientific impact. Common whites have neither the brain power nor the cultural traits to contribute anything of value."

    I disagree. They simply cant compete with the power of Jewish networking. When I go the US and listen to PR in my rented car it seems that everybody on air comes with a Jewish name. It does not matter if they are stupid or have a speech impediment they were the ones to be selected. Obviously whoever selects is also a Jew and they do come with chutzpah.

    Same thing on CNN. You have to be a Jew or colored to be hired. Gay is OK too. Even if they need an expert to be interviewed he is usually a Jew.

    I believe the same happens when granting tenures. Jews vote for other Jews non Jews vote according to merit. Sooner or later everybody on board will be Jewish and than you could really say that: "Common whites have neither the brain power nor the cultural traits to contribute anything of value."

    However it is like with affirmative action. If you see a Jew in position you should automatically question his qualifications.
  113. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @martin_2
    There are 1.3 billion Chinese. There are roughly 50 million English. The average IQ of the Chinese is around 105, English is around 100. Yet I cannot think of one living Chinese mathematician or physicist of such renown as Roger Penrose, Stephen Hawking, Andrew Miles, John Conway, Alan Baker, Ben Green; except for Terence Tao.
    There must be something genetic going on.

    There are not 50 million English with an IQ of 100. That is obviously a lie. There may be 50 million people in the UK, but they are all a mix of low IQ Muslims, Africans, and lower class whites mixed in with some exceptionally smart white people. A much smaller number than 50million of course.

    Also, the fact you haven’t heard of the contributions from other cultures doesn’t mean much either. Other countries like India and China are still emerging from agrarian societies. Also, Western institutions and media are biased in favor of their own kind. So I wouldn’t place much on what some Englishman has heard.

    Read More
  114. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Priss Factor
    "The average IQ of the Chinese is around 105"

    This is based on questionable data of elite kids in Shanghai.

    The regular Chiner's IQ is no higher than that of whitey.

    Another example of wishful thinking from white people.

    You are probably talking about PISA scores which are related to IQ but might have some variability in selection.

    The Chinese IQ was not taken from a small sample size from elite Shanghai students.

    If anything I would call into question the IQ of white people today. With how much immigration and race mixing that has gone on in Western societies, and the devaluation of the intellect for the last 30 or so years, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a big drop in white IQ.

    Read More
  115. joe webb says:

    I saw a chart the other day with Asians, I guess chinese, at 117% higher in money making than White men in the US.

    White men have a couple IQ points less…and the smarter chinks get here in the first place compared to their stay-at-home brethren. Chinks have no outside interests except family, and so there work, work , work. no sports, no, motor sports, not much else…just nose to the grindstone and of course forget politics…prostrate in the dust in front of the Emperor du jour. Do what you are told. To Get Rich is Glorious! the current chink communist slogan.

    So, money, money, money is the chinky ca-ching, ca-ching, ca-ching!!! better than the jews.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
  116. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Priss Factor
    In all this talk of Jews and Chiners, what about the Anglos?

    They are the ones who built US, Canada, and Australia that are controlled by Jews and filling up with Chiners.

    I think Australia and Canada better be more vigilant about Chiners as they do have the possibility of being overrun by them. Chiners have to deal with too much diversity and other groups to ever take power in the US.

    Anyway, what of the Anglos in this new system? What role will they play?

    And why did they lose out in the lands of their own creation?

    Maybe their very advantage had a huge weakness.

    The huge advantage of Anglos was principle, honor, and rule of law.

    But for those to work properly, a community has to be de-culture-ized. Rule of law must apply to all individuals. Principle means one has to favor stuff like meritocracy over one's own kind. And honor means one must maintain dignity.

    Among themselves, these were good things to have. But those factors de-emphasized culture and kinship and heritage since laws must be fair and neutral to all.

    So, over time, Anglos lost their blood-and-guts identity.

    And when their nations were filled up with darkies and Jews, Anglos didn't have the red blood and guts cultural tribal sense to fight and win. Their culture became golf club privilege and high-toned air of Bill Buckley.
    And if white people did dig into blood and guts, their enemies could invoke the very Anglo book of fairness and point out how 'racist' the Anglos were acting.

    So, Rule of Law and Neutral Justice are good things... but they turn people into bland individuals who are decultured and favor principles over blood and homeland. When such anemic people come in contact with red blooded folks, they lack the balls to fight and struggle.

    Jews learned the art/science of rule of law, but they never gave up their blood and guts cultural sense... and they esp regained it after the problems of communism, nazism, and Zionism.

    Communism taught socialist Jews that just being 'worker of the world' was dull and meaningless. While social justice is good, man needs culture and history and heritage.
    So, Jews found more satisfaction in Zionism that bound socialism with Jewish identity and culture.
    In some ways, Germans did same with National Socialism that bound Germanism with socialism. If Nazis had kept it national devoid of nasty chauvinism, it might have succeeded like Zionism. But Hitler was a racial chauvinist and imperialist. (It could be that the undoing of Zionism in the long run is its imperialist side. Occupation of West Bank is turning out costly. And Ziocon messing of the Middle East may lead to some long term disasters for Jews.)

    Anyway, rule of law and idea of justice are good and necessary but they are tools. They are weak as core culture and identity of a people.

    A Jew who feels as Jew and Zionist has meaning. But a Jew who rejects his identity and says, "I'm just for individual liberty and rule of law" has weak meaning.

    Tools are good and necessary but must not be mistaken with the person of blood and flesh they serve.

    After all, each person matters more as a blood-and-flesh product of family than any ideology he adopts.
    If ideology or ideas count the most in determining identity, then it means you are NOTHING unless you believe in something. What you believe counts more than your very existence.

    So, if you believe libertarianism is what counts most, a person who is not libertarian is not human and has no value. But in fact, a person's worth remains intact regardless of what he believes.
    A Jew is no less a Jew for abandoning communism and adopting capitalism. He is still a Jew. His core identity is more than any ideology. This is why a Jew must put Jewishness and Zionism first before any ideology. He may adopt parts of ideologies to serve his Jewish interest. But the thing is to have the ideology to serve him and his people than to have him and his people serve an ideology as the endall of truth.

    Tools exist to serve humans, humans don't exist to serve tools.
    Even Marx made this point. Economics must serve man. But capitalism too often makes us believe we exist to serve the economy.

    Economy must serve man and his nation.

    Globalism says ALL MEN must serve the economy of globalists.
    In the end, it means we all must serve the economy of Wall Street and Las Vegas.

    The huge advantage of Anglos was divide and conquer, disregard of the human rights of non Anglos, and slavery.

    Anglos are best at dividing potential threats into pieces, and then getting them to attack each other while Anglos keep out of the frackas.

    While there Chinese visited the New World, they did not colonize or genocide the natives there. Whites killed them off and made them slaves.

    And this talk of justice, honor, rule of law, bla bla bla is just propaganda. This only applied to the people at the very top of those societies. Non anglos had none of these things, neither did non elite anglos save for a brief period of time in America.

    Nice try.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "While there Chinese visited the New World, they did not colonize or genocide the natives there. Whites killed them off and made them slaves."

    Mao killed 50 million Chinese. Chinese were too busy killing own kind to bother with others.

    And in the 19th century, the Taiping Rebellion. shiite.

    Also, China was the #1 backer of the horrible Khmer Rouge.

    And if Anglos suck so bad, how come Hong Kong and Singapore do so well?

    And why do so many Chinese want to come to Anglospheric worlds?

    Why do they prefer rule of 'white racists' to yellow tyrants?

    And Chinese were into foot-binding for 1000 yrs.

    (Sad to say, the West now worships men who cut off dicks and balls)
    , @El Dato

    Anglos are best at dividing potential threats into pieces, and then getting them to attack each other while Anglos keep out of the frackas.
     
    This is why we have refined to a very high degree the art of leisurly smoking while waiting for events to unfold.
    , @Unzerker

    While there Chinese visited the New World
     
    There's not a shred of evidence the Chinese ever discovered America on their own.

    The Chinese didn't even colonize Taiwan, before the Dutch conquered it. The natives of Taiwan were still living in the stone age at the time.

    We are talking about a bunch of navel gazing people who didn't even care about the big fertile island just off their coast. Of course they didn't discover any foreign lands, let alone colonize it.
    , @Salger
    Tell me more on how only Whites had slavery and war.

    Also, you're a crackpot.
  117. @Hbd investor
    Untrue Chinese immigration was limited due to fears of communism until Nixon opened up immigration in 1978 near the end of the cold war, this was when the high quality immigrants came in.

    Before that Chinese immigration was blocked by the Chinese exclusion act that was only removed in 1943 at the end of ww2, China immediately went red and immigration was unofficially banned.

    So the majority of Chinese Americans comprise of the descendants of rail road builders and other workers who came to the us to do manual labor or war refugees Chinese who fled from the ccp (experience taking in war refugees shows that refugees are not elite immigrants) ,

    http://globalworkers.org/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/Top%20ten%20sending%20countries%20H-1B%20workers%20by%20nonimmigrant%20petitions%20approved%20and%20admissions%20flow%202011.JPG

    The new immigrants aren't h1b either see the above chart most of the h1b are from India most of the new immigrants get to the USA by chain immigration or marriage fraud Or asylum

    Half of all asylum cases are from China


    http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/02/23/nyregion/asylum-fraud-in-chinatown-industry-of-lies.html

    More Chinese immigrants apply for asylum than any other immigrant group in the country, with the Chinese population in New York leading the way: Over the past six years, about half of all applications filed by Chinese immigrants not facing deportation were submitted in New York City.

    Er, Jimmy Carter was POTUS in 1978. Richard Nixon resigned August 9, 1974.

    Read More
  118. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:
    @Anonymous
    The Chinese had their run too where they invented a lot, so did the Indians.

    Non Jewish whites are largely invisible now when it comes to cultural or Scientific impact. Common whites have neither the brain power nor the cultural traits to contribute anything of value.

    It doesn’t matter.

    In the end, DQ or dick quotient will determine things.

    And in this Chinese fall short of whites, Jews, and esp the jaffers.

    In modern sexpot world, Chinee women are into me-so-horny mode.
    They lose virginity early to non-Asian men and ‘don’t want to go back.’
    Even bookworms like amy chua went non-chinee and in her book she says that is the norm in elite circles.

    Look how 50% of Chinee girl in the West give womb to non-Chinee men.
    They may be proud of Chinee cooking and culture but they are ashamed of chinee men or to have chinee men’s kids.
    Their policy is Chinese Male Exclusion Act in their pooter. Their bedrooms have No Dogs and Chinese Males Allowed.

    These mixed race kid will imprint on non-Chinese man as father and figure of authority, thus cultural identity. They will see their mothers as having dumped inferior Chinee men for superior non-chinee man.

    So, who wins in the end? Brains don’t create life. Puds do. And Chinee pud lose big in the DQ department esp in our porny world where girls are encouraged to loudly and publicly talk about dick, dick, dick like in sex and city.

    You come here with a brain filled with IQ but loin lacking in boing. Boing is Being.
    You read but no breed.
    Even a lowlife poor negro who humps ho’s will produce kids but you won’t produce any.

    Also, modern world calls for ‘game’. For most of Chinee history, no game was required. Chinee men and Chinee were matched by parents.
    And then, China was closed to the world and all Chinee werevpoor under communism. So, Chinee women only had Chinee men. Since all people poor, they married on just human affection.

    But in the West, Chinee girl is not just content with human affection.. She’s into fortune and success.
    Also, she can choose from all sorts of men and realize that Chinee men inferior in DQ and game.
    They are nerdy like this fella:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7z5YnUE-sME

    What a panda boy dork.

    So, you lose. You may read more but you breed less.
    And since Chinee men evolved in slavish society, they no got ‘game’ and so very lame.

    It’s like the theory of the 3 C’s.

    http://mygumbyisyours.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-three-cs.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hacienda
    You're effette.
    , @Anonymous
    Lol.

    You sound like a bitter white guy. If you wanna site DQ sorry to say that the brothers got everyone beat there as millions of white women can attest to.

    You can try to claim whites have more game than asians, but everyone else has more game than white people do. This is why white women mix with other races so frequently.

    And unlike China, America has that diversity that I'm sure makes you so happy.

    Glad to see you quit on the IQ angle by the way.
  119. Escher says:
    @Gene Su
    It's the Tiger Mom (and Dad) phenomenon. Let's talk about some ways that Asians are different from other ethnicities.
    1. Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don't go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter).
    2. Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don't see it as a sign of low rank. Thomas Sowell has written once that the laziness of black and white southerners has to do with the view that having to do manual labor was a disgrace. I have dealt with so many Asian VPs handling their own products and sweeping their floors.
    3. Asian parents force their kids to study. My mom won't let me out of the house until I spelled every word on the flash cards correctly.
    4. Asian parents will switch schools if they believe that their kid was not being educated. Sympathizers of blacks talk about how they are trapped in failing schools. Let's take that as true. Why is it I don't see the majority of blacks taking their kids out of failing schools? Only a minority, however large, will pay a private school tuition or drive across town to a charter school. Asian parents will pinch every penny to send their kids to a private school.
    5. Asian kids tend to be more introverted. Introverted nerds tend to be into science and math.

    You’re dead wrong I am afraid. Asians take great pride in having servants or others do their errands and unpleasant tasks for them.

    Read More
  120. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says:
    @Anonymous
    The huge advantage of Anglos was divide and conquer, disregard of the human rights of non Anglos, and slavery.

    Anglos are best at dividing potential threats into pieces, and then getting them to attack each other while Anglos keep out of the frackas.

    While there Chinese visited the New World, they did not colonize or genocide the natives there. Whites killed them off and made them slaves.

    And this talk of justice, honor, rule of law, bla bla bla is just propaganda. This only applied to the people at the very top of those societies. Non anglos had none of these things, neither did non elite anglos save for a brief period of time in America.

    Nice try.

    “While there Chinese visited the New World, they did not colonize or genocide the natives there. Whites killed them off and made them slaves.”

    Mao killed 50 million Chinese. Chinese were too busy killing own kind to bother with others.

    And in the 19th century, the Taiping Rebellion. shiite.

    Also, China was the #1 backer of the horrible Khmer Rouge.

    And if Anglos suck so bad, how come Hong Kong and Singapore do so well?

    And why do so many Chinese want to come to Anglospheric worlds?

    Why do they prefer rule of ‘white racists’ to yellow tyrants?

    And Chinese were into foot-binding for 1000 yrs.

    (Sad to say, the West now worships men who cut off dicks and balls)

    Read More
    • Replies: @5371
    [Also, China was the #1 backer of the horrible Khmer Rouge.]

    If you forget about the US.
    , @Equalizer
    Whites have dominated only the last 300 or 400 years. Generally, for thousands of years they were regarded as mostly barbarians by Middle Eastern people (like the Jews and Arabs) and Asian. You are very selective in your history and very biased.
  121. 5371 says:
    @Priss Factor
    "I am European... Sorry"

    French can't do physical comedy.

    German comedy? Where?

    There's a saying.

    "Hell is where Swedes do comedy."

    Only Brits, Italians, Jews,Jivers, and Hong-Kongers do good comedy.

    But the Dinner Game the French movie was funny as hell.

    And Kusterica is funny as hell.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmzDcNjWLqQ
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLNx-w7yBFk

    Louis de Funès couldn’t do physical comedy? Are you out of your mind?

    Read More
  122. Rehmat says:

    No Fred Jewish population has not declined in the United States. Some of the Jews, though, have adopted Christian names to penetrate political and religious establishments in order to destroy Christian world from within. For example, John Kerry, president Eisenhower, John Bolton, Archbishop of Canterbury and Pope John Paul II, to name a few. Even some western writers have insisted that Adolf Hitler, Adolf Eichmann, Attaturk were Crypto Jews.

    If one believes the ‘Six Million Died’ story or Talmud’s narrative of “four billion Jews were killed by Romans” – there are over 13 million Jews are still living around the world mostly in Occupied Palestine, United States, France and Argentina.

    Chinese never killed a single Jew for political reason – but the have killed hundreds of thousands of native Muslims in China.

    China has very close relations with the Zionist entity, especially in arms and other technically fields. According to Newsweek, Chinese businessmen learn how to made more profit by studying Talmud.

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/01/28/israel-seeks-russia-china-help-to-ward-off-war-with-iran/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seraphim
    @Muslim natives in China

    You mean natives of China who became Muslims.
  123. El Dato says:
    @Priss Factor
    Jews of Allen and Kubrick’s generation grew up in awe of Wasp preeminence when US and UK dominated the world, and Kubrick’s films are also Anglo-obsessed.
    And Steven Spielberg could be the last of the Jewish breed that grew up with Anglo-Americans as the icons of American Prowess and Manhood.

    J.J. Abrams who grew up in a Jewish-dominated America has no respect for white gentiles as he goes about filling STAR WARS sequel with a ghastly Negro as future impregnator of a white girl to produce a galactic Obama-mofo.

    In some ways, the Anglosphere is more powerful than ever with US being the sole superpower and the Americanization of EU, Latin America, and East Asia.
    American-style English language is firmly entrenched as lingua franca around the world. But even as Anglosphere grows ever more powerful, Wasps in it become less powerful. The New World Order is more like the Anglowicz Sphere.

    J.J. Abrams who grew up in a Jewish-dominated America has no respect for white gentiles as he goes about filling STAR WARS sequel with a ghastly Negro as future impregnator of a white girl to produce a galactic Obama-mofo.

    I will save that quote.

    Still,,. as The Immortal Mister Plinkett explained in one of his reviews (but regarding Star Wars “The Phantom Menace”, as mis-directed by George Lucas):

    Why is Samuel Jackson in a Star Wars Movie?? He is there to pander to the “Urban Market” – which is to say Blacks. Well, the Urban Market once stole my video recorder…

    Read More
  124. I figured it was the result of a few generations of Ivy-league types (Jewish and otherwise) selecting other Ivy-league types as mating partners and dumbing down the microcosm in the process. The children are legacies, and therefore don’t have to really try to get into the Ivy-league, but doing so gives the veneer of ongoing superiority.

    Read More
  125. avraham says:

    There was a kind of synergy between Reason and Revelation. This was based to a large degree on European Jew’s respect for Maimonides and the general Mediaeval approach which saw a strong connection between faith and reason. So there was plenty of motivation to see great good in STEM.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    They especially loved the part about the drowning goyim.(let him drown)
  126. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Articles by racist dbags always seems to attract a huge following of racist dbags.

    There is logic in this world.

    Read More
  127. El Dato says:
    @Anonymous
    The huge advantage of Anglos was divide and conquer, disregard of the human rights of non Anglos, and slavery.

    Anglos are best at dividing potential threats into pieces, and then getting them to attack each other while Anglos keep out of the frackas.

    While there Chinese visited the New World, they did not colonize or genocide the natives there. Whites killed them off and made them slaves.

    And this talk of justice, honor, rule of law, bla bla bla is just propaganda. This only applied to the people at the very top of those societies. Non anglos had none of these things, neither did non elite anglos save for a brief period of time in America.

    Nice try.

    Anglos are best at dividing potential threats into pieces, and then getting them to attack each other while Anglos keep out of the frackas.

    This is why we have refined to a very high degree the art of leisurly smoking while waiting for events to unfold.

    Read More
  128. anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Calling these groups smart is hilarious.

    Let’s see, one group considers themselves chosen, and superior to others. They think others exist to serve them. A set of delusional beliefs which condemn their faith to the minuscule minority exclusive membership cult that they are.

    The other holds a faith that venerates their ancestors as gods, and not to forget their worship of wealth.

    How smart can they really be?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde
    Smarter than confident atheists like yourself.
  129. Realist says:
    @pink_point
    Do we know little about intelligence?

    Our concept of intelligence mirrors quite well the workings and skills of one part of the human brain, I think, while the rest of it is still to be understood (and can hardly be understood by intelligence alone, perhaps).

    Bach's and Beethoven's IQ is estimated to have been more or less 160.
    There are probably some thousand people, in the East, with a 160 or higher IQ, and none of them is going to compose what Bach and Beethoven did: not because we don't understand something about intelligence, but because that takes some skill that is not intelligence (while it still lies in the brain).

    A serious IQ test may predict a lot of things of an individual's possible achievements.
    It can tell what the ceiling of that person's achievement is: the best that he or she can do.

    Intelligence is the raw ability of the mind in analytical / functional processing, the most important when it comes to concrete achievements, and anything related with science, but, particularly, technic.

    Non-technic science also needs phantasy, imagination, if we think of very very high level, and that's why as soon as you move out of the line of engineering and technology the white people — including a group of white people who absolutely don't want to know they are a group of white people, id est, the Ashkenazi — outdo Asians.

    The 21th century will be the century of technic; it may well be an Asian century.

    You say: "Another of my friends has an Asian wife and thus entree into the Asian community. He quotes their (wisely private) outlook: “Whites are lazy and stupid.”

    If you like succinct, you just got it."

    Asians very often express admiration for white civilization and cultural achievements. I often speak with many of them, and know it for a fact. Xi Jin Ping's daughter is studying or has studied at Harvard.
    A lot of middle-class Chinese dream of having their offspring study in American university.
    I personally think they are more humble than it is reasonable to, and should get rid of this kind of complex of inferiority, realizing that today already, or anyway very soon, the best places in the world to study will be in the East and not the USA.

    Regardless, they can't help wondering why, despite what IQ tests say, about 98% of inventions, artistic creations, and philosophies in the human story have come from the white people (including the whites who hate to know they are whites too).

    So, well, you wished to quote somebody as saying what you felt the need for saying, that whites are "lazy and stupid", and you found someone you could quote.

    Humans are made "lady and stupid" by ease and comfort: the Asian are going to be changed by that, too, in the middle-long run; the Jews are already being changed by that as well.
    I fully subscribe to the "hunger" theory. Hunger accounts for half of what it takes to achieve, the other half being skills.
    One can't do without skills, but, likewise, one can't do without "hunger."

    “Bach’s and Beethoven’s IQ is estimated to have been more or less 160.”

    IQ estimates are worthless.

    Read More
  130. Karl says:
    @anony-mouse
    Outside of the Orthodox, American Jews aren't having many children. If you don't get born in the first place its hard to win many awards.

    In the future all Jews will be Orthodox and/or Israeli.

    (Also with intermarriage having a 'Jewish' last name only defines your paternal ancestry.)

    > In the future all Jews will be Orthodox and/or Israeli

    bing fucking-o.

    The Pro Schneur League teams (eg, American Jewish Committee) are in quite the tizzy about it. Bureaucratic expense accounts are at stake, for christ’s sake!!

    .It’s also worth noting that China’s Tech rise coincides (time-wise) quite well, with the decision to send HUNDREDS of kids to Israeli universities every year.

    The Thai chicks still have a better rate of locking down an Israeli husband.

    Read More
  131. Finally, their great leap forward, during our slow creep backward. Fits on a sticker which sticks to a bumper . . . where it may be ignored as we hurtle off the cliff.

    Read More
  132. Karl says:
    @mtn cur
    What do you mean, "noticeably more advanced than carrier pigeons," NSA can't eavesdrop on the old mark I model 0 homing pigeon and likely never will.

    > NSA can’t eavesdrop on the old mark I model 0 homing pigeon and likely never will

    Prussians had hawks to take out French pigeons smuggling messages out the Siege of Paris. Says wiki. Wiki is set up to repeat what someone else wrote; not all that much actual fact checking.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mtn cur
    Hence, braces of pigeons were often used for important stuff.
  133. 5371 says:
    @Priss Factor
    "While there Chinese visited the New World, they did not colonize or genocide the natives there. Whites killed them off and made them slaves."

    Mao killed 50 million Chinese. Chinese were too busy killing own kind to bother with others.

    And in the 19th century, the Taiping Rebellion. shiite.

    Also, China was the #1 backer of the horrible Khmer Rouge.

    And if Anglos suck so bad, how come Hong Kong and Singapore do so well?

    And why do so many Chinese want to come to Anglospheric worlds?

    Why do they prefer rule of 'white racists' to yellow tyrants?

    And Chinese were into foot-binding for 1000 yrs.

    (Sad to say, the West now worships men who cut off dicks and balls)

    [Also, China was the #1 backer of the horrible Khmer Rouge.]

    If you forget about the US.

    Read More
  134. Clyde says:
    @anonymous
    Calling these groups smart is hilarious.

    Let's see, one group considers themselves chosen, and superior to others. They think others exist to serve them. A set of delusional beliefs which condemn their faith to the minuscule minority exclusive membership cult that they are.

    The other holds a faith that venerates their ancestors as gods, and not to forget their worship of wealth.

    How smart can they really be?

    Smarter than confident atheists like yourself.

    Read More
  135. Here we go again with Freddy’s mindless obsession about IQ and intelligence and who has it and who doesn’t, yadda yadda yadda.

    “Years ago, when I was tech writer,… bla, blah, blah…”

    Wowza, I’m impressed and humbled all at once. Since yer so smart, I guess I’d better lissen up, eh? I better take yer evry werd as Gospel er sumpin cuz yer obviously my superior. I’m surprised you didn’t tell us agin how smart you must be cuz yerown daddy wuz a mathemutician fer da navy, and it’s in da jeans ;) ‘n sech.

    Anyway, as any half wit can see, treating Jews as an ethnic group is pretty mindless since Judaism is a proselytizing religion. That means that Jews can be of any race or ethnicity just as Christians can. I guess even a fella with a high IQ (in Freddy’s case that obviously means Idiot Quotient) can ascertain what that means.

    Freddy, may I suggest you get someone to read and explain Sand’s book to you?

    “The Invention of the Jewish People,” first published in Hebrew in Israel with the title, Matai ve’ech humtza ha’am hayehudi?, is by Shlomo Sand, Professor of History at Tel Aviv University.

    It explains and clarifies a lot about Zionism as well as “Semitism.”

    The book was a bestseller in Israel for several months …

    http://mondoweiss.net/2011/12/new-york-times-implies-anti-zionism-is-anti-semitic.html

    Here’s more:

    “Countering official Zionist historiography, Sand questions whether the Jewish People ever existed as a national group with a common origin in the Land of Israel/Palestine. He concludes that the Jews should be seen as a religious community comprising a mishmash of individuals and groups that had converted to the ancient monotheistic religion but do not have any historical right to establish an independent Jewish state in the Holy Land. In short, the Jewish People, according to Sand, are not really a “people” in the sense of having a common ethnic origin and national heritage. They certainly do not have a political claim over the territory that today constitutes Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, including Jerusalem.”

    http://inventionofthejewishpeople.politics.webfactional.com/

    Read More
    • Replies: @WhatEvvs
    Where would a comment on Unz be without someone like you? Fred was referring specifically to Ashkenazi Jews. As for Sand's book, he isn't saying anything new. All peoples are invented to a degree. So the Jews invented a usable mythology, which magically changes as circumstances change. There's nothing special about that.
    , @Che Guava
    As I have mentioned before, the state broadcaster (NHK) demonstrates that bagels have a southtwest Asian origin in their documentary series The Silk Road. I do not recall if it was Tajikistan or Uzbekistan, but the bakers were clearly making ur-bagels


    Judaism is a proselytizing religion.
     
    That is a lie, and you know it, Reform Judaism to an extent, Cabbalists to an extent (say, to the extent that they can recruit Madonna or, at times, garden-variety occultists).

    Otherwise, men who marry shiksas (yes, I know it is a nasty word, also know enough to know that it is a commom term of abuse) are not Jewish unless the shiksa or man are suffiently important or wealthy.

    Otherwise, the definition is purely maternal line.

    This applies to the international legal and illegal work network, too.

    I was pleased to see the Japanese govt. crack down on it over ten years ago.

    They did many really bad things, just from what I saw and what they said and complained about.
    , @biz

    Judaism is a proselytizing religion.
     
    It is difficult to get more incorrect than that.

    The rest of the comment attempts to, by flogging Shlomo Sand's bit of ahistorical gibberish. But still, getting the one defining characteristic of Judaism 180 degrees wrong - wow.
  136. George says:

    If Asians are so capable, why are our best and brightest, military academy grads, mostly white? Oo-rah!

    “Whites are lazy and stupid.” Excuse me Sir, “Whites are lazy and/or stupid.”, it’s blacks that are “lazy and stupid.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randall Parker
    First of all, our best and brightest aren't going to military academies. They are going Stanford, CalTech, MIT, Ivy Leagues, Duke, CMU, and a few others. Then they go to Silicon Valley or Wall Street, trending more Silicon Valley than Wall Street.

    Second, signing up for the military when our elites have maintained unhinged foreign policy in the Middle East for many years is not a sign of being best and brightest. Going off to fight in the Middle East is more a sign of either foolishness or a lack of better options.

    Third, read David Halberstam's Best And Brighest book to see just how much the best and brightest can screw up royally.
  137. Unzerker says:
    @Renoman
    Hey Fred, what's a Hagvaca? Google doesn't know.

    House and Garden Variety (non-Jewish) Caucasians

    It’s explained in the text, the first time it’s mentioned.

    Read More
  138. AaronB says:

    Good noticng, Fred.

    It has been obvious for some time that the facts about IQ are murky. For instance, IQ proponets love to tell us IQ is well correlated to life success, which is true, but then so is ambition. How much of what IQ measures is simply ambition? I’d wager a fairly large percentage. So simple a concept, potentially so important, yet so rarely given any attention!

    Jewish over performance was never just about IQ, as statistically speaking, there were always way more high IQ whites in the country. There was always an intangible factor that loomed huge and enormous but no one could quite identify.

    Its not just IQ. The problem extends to all supposedly stable geneticaly heritable traits on a national level, which simply refuse to stay stable over time despite the best efforts of our best scientists to insist they should do so.

    The Germans were the sleepy, dreamy poets and thinkers of Europe for a long time, with an actual reputation for dishonesty and shoddy workmanship (!) for a while, and poor discipline.

    What happened to stable genetic traits that are heritable? Oh my.

    In the 19th cent, the popular tropes had it as, lazy, slothful Asians, and energetic westerners.

    Where did THAT go? Lazy chinese indeed.

    But as Steve Sailer says in another context, you’re not supposed to notice any of this stuff, because it threatens the attempt to erect a clear, simple, deterministic, picture of human nature scientists have been trying to establish for some time now.

    You can’t measure ambition, or other intangibles, so we all preferred to sweep these disagreeable little details under the rug in order to make tidy little narrative.

    The temper of the age is scientistic, so we ignore messy details and intangibles.

    The result is clarity at the expense of accuracy, simplicity and perhaps control at the sacrifice of understanding.

    At this point in time, it’s impose be to know the true differences in intelligence between groups. You tourself, Fred, have noticed that Mexicans ate far more intelligent than clueless Americans think, and I’ve noticed the same thing with all my third world travels.

    What if Mexicans simply don’t try very hard on IQ tests? How would we know this, how would we measure this?

    I’m Jewish, and was a national merit semifinalist from new york. I showed up to the test completely unaware it was that day, after a night of partying, and completely bungled the math section while doing great on English. My life was a shambles at that time anyways and i wasn’t laying any attention to math. If I were chinese, is there any doubt my parents would organize my whole life around doing great on that test?

    As a Jew, I know tons of clever and capable Jews, but the smartest people I’ve ever met were whites. What gives? Mere anecdote? Maybe.

    These non wrstern people are not as stupid as we think, far from it, and the reason they are not more advanced is because they simply have different priorities.

    Americans cannot understand how anyone can prefer a life that doesn’t involve being an advanced industrial economy. They are sure that if some countries fail at that, it can only be because of stupidity. Yet everything is a sacrifice, and how much have we lost in the West by becoming mere consumers in an an industrial economy? Yet we cannot imagine that other people may not be so eager to make that exchange. Of course, Americans are fools, so what can we expect?

    Read More
    • Replies: @WhatEvvs
    "But as Steve Sailer says in another context, you’re not supposed to notice any of this stuff, because it threatens the attempt to erect a clear, simple, deterministic, picture of human nature scientists have been trying to establish for some time now."

    Yeah, but the HBD guys notice what they want to notice and don't notice anything they don't. So they are no different from the crazy leftists in that regard. Their shtick is Genes Uber Alles, and it doesn't matter if you grow up in a shambles, what matters is that the tape inside your Jewish brain unfolded as Darwin decreed. I drop by Unz every six months or so to see what the crazies here say, and it the same (((old story))), never changes.
    , @Anonymous
    IQ tests themselves do not determine someone's future or worth as a person, but the IQ tests themselves are accurate. They are a measure is someone's cognitive ability. That's it.

    To say that Mexicans merely don't try hard on the IQ test so add 20 IQ points or that Jews are out partying the night before so add another 40 points to Jewish IQ is rediculous.

    Meanwhile subtract 20 IQ points from the Chinese since all they do is study for IQ tests day and night.

    These arguments are standard arguments when white people are confronted with higher Chinese IQ and feel threatened.

    First they deny the validity of the IQ test, then when that doesn't work they say IQ doesn't matter. Why? Reasons lol.

    Meanwhile white people sure do like using IQ to show superiority against blacks and hispanics. I guess then IQ tests are accurate and relevant lol.
    , @Talha
    Dear AaronB,

    Great points sir! This one I cannot agree with more:

    These non wrstern people are not as stupid as we think, far from it, and the reason they are not more advanced is because they simply have different priorities.
     
    This is very important; technological advancement is not neutral and its effects on a culture are not always benign. A tribal culture that values close-knit family, filial piety, normative sexual mores, respect for the wisdom and guidance of elders may not want to trade that in for an uncompromising individualism, no matter what the material benefits. There is also religion which is important to many people.

    Neil Postman wrote a beautiful work on this, which I would highly recommend to everyone:
    https://www.amazon.com/Technopoly-Surrender-Technology-Neil-Postman/dp/0679745408

    Peace.
    , @Talha
    Also...

    Yet everything is a sacrifice, and how much have we lost in the West by becoming mere consumers in an an industrial economy?
     
    Self control? Thoreau would certainly say so. IQ tests will never be able to gauge the spiritual aspect (or loss thereof) of the human condition.
    "As he burned he never moved a muscle, never uttered a sound, his outward composure in sharp contrast to the wailing people around him."
    "The self-immolation was later regarded as a turning point in the Buddhist crisis and a critical point in the collapse of the Diem regime."
    http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/the-burning-monk-1963/

    If a culture can teach and value that kind of mastery-of-self, which may be inversely related to one's materialism - it is not silly to imagine that they may consider its preservation worth more than all the iPhones in the world.

    Peace.

    , @Santoculto
    ''The Germans were the sleepy, dreamy poets and thinkers of Europe for a long time, with an actual reputation for dishonesty and shoddy workmanship (!) for a while, and poor discipline.''


    This ''germans'' (poets, thinkers) always were a minority among germanic people and the cultural enphasis also impact the general impression that we tend to have about ''peoples''.

    So we still can have many potentially dreamy poets and thinkers ..... but ........ they no have visibility ''or'' their reproductive niches become very infertile.

    there are a greater number of very good and talented poets, but just few them are recognized as ''geniuses'', probably because they invent new styles and not exactly because they were/are the best of the poets, i mean, those who make the best poetry.


    ''What happened to stable genetic traits that are heritable?''

    Higher creativity is a never stable genetic traits, maybe their potential. Creativity is a hunger-genes, is not the process but the high end - product of the natural eugenic process of a family (extended ;) or not)

    creativity is like gigantism, potentially dysfunctional, extremist and by now tend to worse the individual ''adaptative'' fitness than, for example, conformism-behavioral ''trait''.

    Avg ashkenazi jews, seems, are astutes, i mean, they tend to be able to catch the big picture quickly, understand the context, and try to adapt in a real world while avg white-europeans, namely northwestern europeans, tend to be much less objective than jews. Some to many of the creative geniuses tend to mix both psycho-cognitive approach styles.


    ''You can’t measure ambition, or other intangibles, so we all preferred to sweep these disagreeable little details under the rug in order to make tidy little narrative.''

    Bu you can measure potential of this frequence, like the vocal range of an opera singer as happen with every behavioral trait or potentiallity

    we no have a ''trait'' but a entire range of potentiallity and some people have higher range of potentiallity to the certain ''trait'' that i like to call ''frequency''.


    ''At this point in time, it’s impose be to know the true differences in intelligence between groups. You tourself, Fred, have noticed that Mexicans ate far more intelligent than clueless Americans think, and I’ve noticed the same thing with all my third world travels.

    What if Mexicans simply don’t try very hard on IQ tests? How would we know this, how would we measure this?''


    Freed is a leftist, he's addicted to look non-white people specially the people of its wife much better than they are.

    But based on avg perception of the avg american joey about mexicans, he is maybe right, but just in this micro-context.

    There are a middle classes in Mexico, period.
    , @Salger
    I'm sure some 80s IQ Illegal on gibs is totally equal in intellect to the likes of Steven Pinker.
  139. George says:
    @Ron Unz
    Actually, I think these critiques of China's prospects are just total MSM nonsense/propaganda, much like how the old USSR used to endlessly critique America's dreadful economic problems during the 1970s and 1980s.

    Sure, all the MSM headlines endlessly tout China's terrible "economic slowdown"...except that even during this so-called "slowdown" China's per capita GDP has been increasing at roughly 10x America's rate. Here's a handy chart from one of my old articles from a few years ago you might want to consider reading especially since none of the trends have changed all that much:



    http://www.unz.com/article/chinas-rise-americas-fall/

    The real income of urban Chinese workers has been doubling every 5-10 years. It seems to me if the real income of ordinary American workers were doubling every decade, there'd be far fewer complaints about the One Percent.

    Commenters who endlessly ridicule the absurd claims of the MSM on some matters should be more cautious in blindly believing it on other matters.

    1900 was supposed to be the start of the German century, and it was: Germans in America.

    It may be that politcal systems do matter.

    WWII era remark: They might have more Germans, but we have better Germans. USA#1!!!!

    Read More
  140. TheJester says:
    @Hbd investor
    >but think of this; how many very wealthy White families (in the upcoming generation) do you know that can afford the best private schools for their kids and have no worries about finances that have more than 2 kids?

    The Mormon communities don't have a problem churning out kids, a lot of non Mormon whites also live with the Mormons and they also churn out a lot of kids.

    Why?

    Because everyone has a large 5 bed 2 bath house and they barely pay anything in taxes. The public schools in the area are good enough and safe enough so the parents don't have to move to an area where real estate costs a small fortune. Their are no nam's committing crimes.

    Just like how many animals in captivity refuse to breed until certain conditions are met. Whites are the same way, many whites would not consider breeding if crime and violence are high, cost of living high, population density high, not enough money saved up, not enough other children around to socialize with

    Good point! Your comments parallel a recent article I read regarding why Germans are not having kids: high cost of living, high population density, small cramped apartments. There is also another very important shared reason: delayed marriage. As in Germany, the typical WASP in America now marries in his or her 30s. The women are already on the downward curve of their fertility cycles … and couples are habituated to lifestyles that do not make allowance for the disruptive existence of children in their lives.

    We used to have a saying when I was growing up in the 1960s:

    Young women should never marry men over 30 because they make lousy husbands.

    Why? In spite of their best intentions, by that time the men are committed bachelors in their values and lifestyles … and they will never change; that is, they will never become involved and attentive husbands and fathers. Jump ahead 20 years when women are also delaying marriage until their 30s and you get the same result. For both of them, having matched BMWs in the garage, evenings in the local pub, and exotic vacations are more appealing than changing diapers, sorting out (expensive) child care issues, and worrying about how to pay for college.

    Read More
  141. Hacienda says:
    @Priss Factor
    It doesn't matter.

    In the end, DQ or dick quotient will determine things.

    And in this Chinese fall short of whites, Jews, and esp the jaffers.

    In modern sexpot world, Chinee women are into me-so-horny mode.
    They lose virginity early to non-Asian men and 'don't want to go back.'
    Even bookworms like amy chua went non-chinee and in her book she says that is the norm in elite circles.

    Look how 50% of Chinee girl in the West give womb to non-Chinee men.
    They may be proud of Chinee cooking and culture but they are ashamed of chinee men or to have chinee men's kids.
    Their policy is Chinese Male Exclusion Act in their pooter. Their bedrooms have No Dogs and Chinese Males Allowed.

    These mixed race kid will imprint on non-Chinese man as father and figure of authority, thus cultural identity. They will see their mothers as having dumped inferior Chinee men for superior non-chinee man.

    So, who wins in the end? Brains don't create life. Puds do. And Chinee pud lose big in the DQ department esp in our porny world where girls are encouraged to loudly and publicly talk about dick, dick, dick like in sex and city.

    You come here with a brain filled with IQ but loin lacking in boing. Boing is Being.
    You read but no breed.
    Even a lowlife poor negro who humps ho's will produce kids but you won't produce any.

    Also, modern world calls for 'game'. For most of Chinee history, no game was required. Chinee men and Chinee were matched by parents.
    And then, China was closed to the world and all Chinee werevpoor under communism. So, Chinee women only had Chinee men. Since all people poor, they married on just human affection.

    But in the West, Chinee girl is not just content with human affection.. She's into fortune and success.
    Also, she can choose from all sorts of men and realize that Chinee men inferior in DQ and game.
    They are nerdy like this fella:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7z5YnUE-sME
    What a panda boy dork.

    So, you lose. You may read more but you breed less.
    And since Chinee men evolved in slavish society, they no got 'game' and so very lame.

    It's like the theory of the 3 C's.

    http://mygumbyisyours.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-three-cs.html

    You’re effette.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    No, the korons are effete.

    This guy says Korean birthrate is down to 1. Yes, 1. So, Koron men are ball-less dorks who don't even have kids.

    http://koreanbookends.blogspot.com/2016/06/aged-out-korean-style.html

    And the look at all the effete K-pop or gay-pop boys with makeup on their face.

    http://www.kpopstarz.com/articles/90122/20140504/5-pretty-boy-idols-that-didnt-make-it-onto-the-korea-heralds-list.htm

    Trans-racial and transsexual maggots are what Korons are.
    Global homos rule koron, filo, and Japper culture. Just look at J-pop and k-pop.

    Korons exist as whores to put out to America.

    And Korons are cowards. With population twice that of N Korea and economy 40x as big, it still hides behind uncle sam for protection while so many korons flee their country to the US for better material lives.

    Koron dogs will always follow the US.

    Would korons have come up with 'gay pride' parades on their own? No, never, but since US insists, Korons obey and follow like yellow doggy.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyavGXZIQjM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwJLcWfMPIg
  142. Che Guava says:
    @tbraton
    "China is by far the world leader in high-speed rail, of which America has none."

    I believe China is also the world leader in vacant high rise buildings. Maybe there is a need for high-speed rail in China that simply doesn't exist in the U.S. I am aware of the abandoned high-speed rail line that was planned for Florida that had to be abandoned once the high cost and uneconomical nature of the scheme became apparent to many. I think the same fate awaits the high speed rail line contemplated for California. Back in the late 60's and early 70's, I was working in an office with a slightly older man who was a well-educated Italian, and the debate was going on about the funding of an SST by the federal government in competition with the British-French Concorde. I was swayed by articles in the WS Journal that argued that the SST was uneconomical while my Italian friend bemoaned the fact that the U.S. was abandoning its leading role in technology. Well, we decided to pull the plug on the SST, and the Europeans went ahead with the Concorde. The Concorde flew for more than 20 years before the British and French decided to drop it because it wasn't making money. It's nice to have super duper technology, but, if it's not economical, it won't last, and it will cost you unnecessarily as it diverts money to uneconomic goals.

    Japan still has the greatest high-speed rail system in the world. Also the first.

    China’s may already be more extensive for distance (can’t be bothered to check, but likely true by now, given the greater distances), but hardly a network, so far a high incident rate, and much of the tech. and know-how is pilfered from here (and I would guess to a lesser extent, France).

    The network here can’t really be called a network, The hub is very much Tokyo. In a few regional cities, there are switches, where the train is split, and the parts go on to different destinations.

    There is a plan to make Osaka a second hub, but I have no idea how that is supposed to fit in with the planned Tokyo-to-Osaka maglev.

    The current theoretical maximum for splitting trains is about three times, but the trains only have two destinations, at least the last time I rode one, so I think the switching is limited to two .

    I like the slow trains, and recent policy has been to make a consortium of prefectural govt.and existing local private lines take over lines where the bullet trains run on different lines, with Japan Rail holding a share.

    Where the bullet trains run on existing lines, so are only as fast as the special expresses they replaced, the slow trains run three to five times a day.

    but, if it’s not economical, it won’t last, and it will cost you unnecessarily as it diverts money to uneconomic goals

    Indeed, the airport-to-city maglev in China has a strong scent of white elephant about it.

    The new bullet-train services to Hokkaido (particularly) and to the sth.-west are not well-patronised most of the time, the old combinations of all-stops, commuter express in some places at some times, and special express did a better job.

    Concorde, wish I’d ridden it once, closest I’d ever be to space, an economy window seat would have been pricey, but just affordable, a small life regret. At least I saw a real Tu 144 landing, once. Think I never saw a Concorde, except in the sky once, maybe that was also a Tupolev.

    Read More
    • Replies: @tbraton
    Che guava, you obviously know much more than I about high-speed trains, but it seems you share my skepticism about the benefits of those technological marvels. BTW, in contrast to the SST, I would point out that the airliners made the switch from old dependable prop planes to jets in the late 50's-early 60's not simply because of the time savings but because the jets were more fuel efficient than the props, as I understand it. Thus, it all boils down to economics.
  143. @Svigor
    AO: yellows do tend to have chips on their shoulders. Probably comes from finding white-created societies more appealing than the ones they create.

    Japanese accepted, God bless 'em. They're hard core racists, and as dishonest as any other yellow race, but at least they made their own country something to be admired, keep others out, and have no interest in infesting others'. And they make great cars.

    As a thirty-something American white-gentile I have come to understand the complete and utter contempt the Japanese have for these high-IQ human locusts.

    Read More
  144. biz says:

    Unz’s proposed method of using surnames to count Jews performing highly on the SAT, NMSQT, etc. isn’t reliable. For example, as I understand it, he didn’t check this method by using it to estimate the number of Jews in the Harvard (or was it MIT?) entering class, a number which he actually had and could verify his count against.

    As far as I can tell, we still have no way to actually know what the fraction of Jews performing highly on these tests is.

    Read More
  145. WhatEvvs [AKA "Mipchunk"] says:
    @Priss Factor
    Fred Fred Cabbage Head, the video below say China facing big bad times.

    Could be.

    Also, smartest Chinese come to US. They don't go back. They give their brains to US companies where they make more money.
    Also, so many Chinese girls use wombs to make babies for Jewish men like Amy Chua did.
    They are gonna grow up as Jews mostly.

    So, Jews win.

    In China, birthrate disaster looms. Not just due to one-child policy. Even if China had have-all-kids-you-want policy, a lot of women got freedom and taste of better life and will not marry any guy unless he has something to offer.

    Same problem in Japan and Korea and Taiwan and etc.

    Just like in White Europe. No matter how good capitalism and democracy may be in offering fun and material stuff, they are failures if they lead life to stop producing more life.

    In this sense, capitalism kills. Not by death camps but by empty wombs.
    Culture of me-ism makes everyone strive for Good stuff. They wont' settle for less even if they grow old alone and die.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t487ILVf87k

    Well, you certainly have a lot to say about the Jews, so have you done any reading? Where is it written that the children of Jewish fathers/Chinese mothers will grow up Jewish?

    The majority of children of Jewish fathers/non-Jewish mothers do not grow up Jewish, quite apart from the fact that they are not considered Jewish by Judaic law. They just drift away. I see this everywhere, in my own family and others.

    The Jewish future is in the ultra-Orthodox.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    Yep,Chinese mothers preclude Israeli citizenship.Unless the right rabbi concerts them.
  146. WhatEvvs [AKA "Mipchunk"] says:
    @Jacques Sheete
    Here we go again with Freddy's mindless obsession about IQ and intelligence and who has it and who doesn’t, yadda yadda yadda.

    “Years ago, when I was tech writer,… bla, blah, blah…”

     

    Wowza, I’m impressed and humbled all at once. Since yer so smart, I guess I’d better lissen up, eh? I better take yer evry werd as Gospel er sumpin cuz yer obviously my superior. I'm surprised you didn't tell us agin how smart you must be cuz yerown daddy wuz a mathemutician fer da navy, and it’s in da jeans ;) ‘n sech.

    Anyway, as any half wit can see, treating Jews as an ethnic group is pretty mindless since Judaism is a proselytizing religion. That means that Jews can be of any race or ethnicity just as Christians can. I guess even a fella with a high IQ (in Freddy's case that obviously means Idiot Quotient) can ascertain what that means.

    Freddy, may I suggest you get someone to read and explain Sand's book to you?

    “The Invention of the Jewish People,” first published in Hebrew in Israel with the title, Matai ve’ech humtza ha’am hayehudi?, is by Shlomo Sand, Professor of History at Tel Aviv University.

    It explains and clarifies a lot about Zionism as well as “Semitism.”

    The book was a bestseller in Israel for several months …

    http://mondoweiss.net/2011/12/new-york-times-implies-anti-zionism-is-anti-semitic.html
    Here’s more:

    "Countering official Zionist historiography, Sand questions whether the Jewish People ever existed as a national group with a common origin in the Land of Israel/Palestine. He concludes that the Jews should be seen as a religious community comprising a mishmash of individuals and groups that had converted to the ancient monotheistic religion but do not have any historical right to establish an independent Jewish state in the Holy Land. In short, the Jewish People, according to Sand, are not really a “people” in the sense of having a common ethnic origin and national heritage. They certainly do not have a political claim over the territory that today constitutes Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, including Jerusalem.”

    http://inventionofthejewishpeople.politics.webfactional.com/

    Where would a comment on Unz be without someone like you? Fred was referring specifically to Ashkenazi Jews. As for Sand’s book, he isn’t saying anything new. All peoples are invented to a degree. So the Jews invented a usable mythology, which magically changes as circumstances change. There’s nothing special about that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete

    Fred was referring specifically to Ashkenazi Jews.
     
    News to me. Where did he write that?

    As for Sand’s book, he isn’t saying anything new.
     
    I never claimed he did. Even the Roman-Jewish historian Josephus claimed it. Straw man much?

    All peoples are invented to a degree.

     

    You know that and I know that, but judging by the article and many of the responses, the concept is lost on many. To most, it seems, Jews are a monolith and as you and I know, that ain't too accurate.

    So, my point is that generalizing about them is probably pretty mindless as is the article. Freddy seems to be inordinately hung up on early 20th century topics. I bet he's clueless as to the history of IQ tests and the connection between them and eugenics. He seems to think they're something wondrous and useful when in fact, even Binet and Wechsler emphasized the limitations of the things.


    So the Jews invented a usable mythology, which magically changes as circumstances change. There’s nothing special about that.
     
    So?

    That has nothing to do about the point I was making. (See above.)

  147. WhatEvvs [AKA "Mipchunk"] says:
    @AaronB
    Good noticng, Fred.

    It has been obvious for some time that the facts about IQ are murky. For instance, IQ proponets love to tell us IQ is well correlated to life success, which is true, but then so is ambition. How much of what IQ measures is simply ambition? I'd wager a fairly large percentage. So simple a concept, potentially so important, yet so rarely given any attention!

    Jewish over performance was never just about IQ, as statistically speaking, there were always way more high IQ whites in the country. There was always an intangible factor that loomed huge and enormous but no one could quite identify.

    Its not just IQ. The problem extends to all supposedly stable geneticaly heritable traits on a national level, which simply refuse to stay stable over time despite the best efforts of our best scientists to insist they should do so.

    The Germans were the sleepy, dreamy poets and thinkers of Europe for a long time, with an actual reputation for dishonesty and shoddy workmanship (!) for a while, and poor discipline.

    What happened to stable genetic traits that are heritable? Oh my.

    In the 19th cent, the popular tropes had it as, lazy, slothful Asians, and energetic westerners.

    Where did THAT go? Lazy chinese indeed.

    But as Steve Sailer says in another context, you're not supposed to notice any of this stuff, because it threatens the attempt to erect a clear, simple, deterministic, picture of human nature scientists have been trying to establish for some time now.

    You can't measure ambition, or other intangibles, so we all preferred to sweep these disagreeable little details under the rug in order to make tidy little narrative.

    The temper of the age is scientistic, so we ignore messy details and intangibles.

    The result is clarity at the expense of accuracy, simplicity and perhaps control at the sacrifice of understanding.

    At this point in time, it's impose be to know the true differences in intelligence between groups. You tourself, Fred, have noticed that Mexicans ate far more intelligent than clueless Americans think, and I've noticed the same thing with all my third world travels.

    What if Mexicans simply don't try very hard on IQ tests? How would we know this, how would we measure this?

    I'm Jewish, and was a national merit semifinalist from new york. I showed up to the test completely unaware it was that day, after a night of partying, and completely bungled the math section while doing great on English. My life was a shambles at that time anyways and i wasn't laying any attention to math. If I were chinese, is there any doubt my parents would organize my whole life around doing great on that test?

    As a Jew, I know tons of clever and capable Jews, but the smartest people I've ever met were whites. What gives? Mere anecdote? Maybe.

    These non wrstern people are not as stupid as we think, far from it, and the reason they are not more advanced is because they simply have different priorities.

    Americans cannot understand how anyone can prefer a life that doesn't involve being an advanced industrial economy. They are sure that if some countries fail at that, it can only be because of stupidity. Yet everything is a sacrifice, and how much have we lost in the West by becoming mere consumers in an an industrial economy? Yet we cannot imagine that other people may not be so eager to make that exchange. Of course, Americans are fools, so what can we expect?

    “But as Steve Sailer says in another context, you’re not supposed to notice any of this stuff, because it threatens the attempt to erect a clear, simple, deterministic, picture of human nature scientists have been trying to establish for some time now.”

    Yeah, but the HBD guys notice what they want to notice and don’t notice anything they don’t. So they are no different from the crazy leftists in that regard. Their shtick is Genes Uber Alles, and it doesn’t matter if you grow up in a shambles, what matters is that the tape inside your Jewish brain unfolded as Darwin decreed. I drop by Unz every six months or so to see what the crazies here say, and it the same (((old story))), never changes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    I know, mipchunk, it's really quite absurd, but eventually the model will crack as the incongruities become more impossible to ignore.

    Judith Harris actually wrote an absurd book on how family life has no effect on adult outcomes, which are solely controlled by genes plus some unknown factor, which she thought might be peer groups. But the evident trend was to deny that family can have serious impact as opposed to genes, against the wisdom of the ages. Of course, the book was widely hailed.

    In a sense Western culture can be seen as the application of the idea of reductive materialism in ever wider fields, till we reach the point of absurdity and we return to saner ways of thinking. We are far from that point yet, sadly.
  148. WhatEvvs [AKA "Mipchunk"] says:

    I usually disagree with Fred Reed 90%, but in this case, all I can say is, “great stuff.” What Fred is saying is that the decline of the American Jewish community is a bellwether of the decline of the great civilization that they emigrated to three generations ago. And, unusually for an Unz article, he isn’t blaming Jews, for which he deserves a special pat on the back.

    If you want to see how degraded the US is, take a look at a formerly high performing group. American Jews may not be in prisons or taking drugs, but they react in their own way. By giving up hard work, and not forming stable families.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    Great point.

    America today provides conditions that leads to the degregation of every group that comes in to join the national scramble for money and stuff.

    America is the great vulgarization machine of our times. I personally see this with Asians and would caution them to beware. Second generation Asians are fatter, stupider, louder, sloppier, angrier, unhappier.

    For how much longer Asians can buck the universal American trend towards degregation remains to be seen, but my money is on not very long.
  149. Seraphim says:

    Some hard data that would bring some perspective:

    “In China, out of seven million students graduating from college annually 1.2 million have science degrees, or in engineering-related subjects. China’s colleges and universities constantly churn out an army of hyper-connected, fluent English speakers. As Edward Tse observes in China’s Disruptors, by 2020 they will be part of a total graduate workforce of an astonishing 200 million — more than the entire US workforce.” More than all the Jews in the world!
    @The Pearl River Delta showcases the Chinese Dream,By Pepe Escobar

    Read More
  150. Unzerker says:
    @Anonymous
    The huge advantage of Anglos was divide and conquer, disregard of the human rights of non Anglos, and slavery.

    Anglos are best at dividing potential threats into pieces, and then getting them to attack each other while Anglos keep out of the frackas.

    While there Chinese visited the New World, they did not colonize or genocide the natives there. Whites killed them off and made them slaves.

    And this talk of justice, honor, rule of law, bla bla bla is just propaganda. This only applied to the people at the very top of those societies. Non anglos had none of these things, neither did non elite anglos save for a brief period of time in America.

    Nice try.

    While there Chinese visited the New World

    There’s not a shred of evidence the Chinese ever discovered America on their own.

    The Chinese didn’t even colonize Taiwan, before the Dutch conquered it. The natives of Taiwan were still living in the stone age at the time.

    We are talking about a bunch of navel gazing people who didn’t even care about the big fertile island just off their coast. Of course they didn’t discover any foreign lands, let alone colonize it.

    Read More
  151. This will only get serious when Asians begin to encroach on “Hollywood”. Until then, Jews will just continue with their slow but steady retreat from the less important fields such as medicine and finance.

    Read More
  152. Corvinus says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic
    In the future all Jews will be Orthodox and/or Israeli.

    And that will be the end of Jewish superlatives, as the Ashkenazi go extinct or outmarry.

    The Orthodox I know are like the Amish. All their energies are devoted to family and maintenance of their traditions. You are not going to get any symphonies or bullet trains out of them.

    “The Orthodox I know are like the Amish. All their energies are devoted to family and maintenance of their traditions. You are not going to get any symphonies or bullet trains out of them.”

    Speaking in absolutes is a sign of a fool.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Except that what he said is entirely true.

    Sure, some of these Orthodox will still invent things or get their own sitcom, but the majority will be welfare bums just like black people.
  153. @Priss Factor
    Ron Jeremy

    Back in the 80s, a Jewish kid had a VCR and showed us one of his pa's adult videos.

    Shiite, this Jeremy fella had a meater so long that he could suck his own dick.

    You never heard of that other guy,John Holmes?

    Read More
  154. BTW you do not see many Asian chicks that look like the one in the pic at the top.She is a sweetie,most asian broads spittin’ venom and looking for that do re mi.

    Read More
  155. kiismerh says:
    @Anonymous
    The Chinese had their run too where they invented a lot, so did the Indians.

    Non Jewish whites are largely invisible now when it comes to cultural or Scientific impact. Common whites have neither the brain power nor the cultural traits to contribute anything of value.

    “Non Jewish whites are largely invisible now when it comes to cultural or Scientific impact. Common whites have neither the brain power nor the cultural traits to contribute anything of value.”

    I disagree. They simply cant compete with the power of Jewish networking. When I go the US and listen to PR in my rented car it seems that everybody on air comes with a Jewish name. It does not matter if they are stupid or have a speech impediment they were the ones to be selected. Obviously whoever selects is also a Jew and they do come with chutzpah.

    Same thing on CNN. You have to be a Jew or colored to be hired. Gay is OK too. Even if they need an expert to be interviewed he is usually a Jew.

    I believe the same happens when granting tenures. Jews vote for other Jews non Jews vote according to merit. Sooner or later everybody on board will be Jewish and than you could really say that: “Common whites have neither the brain power nor the cultural traits to contribute anything of value.”

    However it is like with affirmative action. If you see a Jew in position you should automatically question his qualifications.

    Read More
  156. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Priss Factor
    It doesn't matter.

    In the end, DQ or dick quotient will determine things.

    And in this Chinese fall short of whites, Jews, and esp the jaffers.

    In modern sexpot world, Chinee women are into me-so-horny mode.
    They lose virginity early to non-Asian men and 'don't want to go back.'
    Even bookworms like amy chua went non-chinee and in her book she says that is the norm in elite circles.

    Look how 50% of Chinee girl in the West give womb to non-Chinee men.
    They may be proud of Chinee cooking and culture but they are ashamed of chinee men or to have chinee men's kids.
    Their policy is Chinese Male Exclusion Act in their pooter. Their bedrooms have No Dogs and Chinese Males Allowed.

    These mixed race kid will imprint on non-Chinese man as father and figure of authority, thus cultural identity. They will see their mothers as having dumped inferior Chinee men for superior non-chinee man.

    So, who wins in the end? Brains don't create life. Puds do. And Chinee pud lose big in the DQ department esp in our porny world where girls are encouraged to loudly and publicly talk about dick, dick, dick like in sex and city.

    You come here with a brain filled with IQ but loin lacking in boing. Boing is Being.
    You read but no breed.
    Even a lowlife poor negro who humps ho's will produce kids but you won't produce any.

    Also, modern world calls for 'game'. For most of Chinee history, no game was required. Chinee men and Chinee were matched by parents.
    And then, China was closed to the world and all Chinee werevpoor under communism. So, Chinee women only had Chinee men. Since all people poor, they married on just human affection.

    But in the West, Chinee girl is not just content with human affection.. She's into fortune and success.
    Also, she can choose from all sorts of men and realize that Chinee men inferior in DQ and game.
    They are nerdy like this fella:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7z5YnUE-sME
    What a panda boy dork.

    So, you lose. You may read more but you breed less.
    And since Chinee men evolved in slavish society, they no got 'game' and so very lame.

    It's like the theory of the 3 C's.

    http://mygumbyisyours.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-three-cs.html

    Lol.

    You sound like a bitter white guy. If you wanna site DQ sorry to say that the brothers got everyone beat there as millions of white women can attest to.

    You can try to claim whites have more game than asians, but everyone else has more game than white people do. This is why white women mix with other races so frequently.

    And unlike China, America has that diversity that I’m sure makes you so happy.

    Glad to see you quit on the IQ angle by the way.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    So, white boys lose to black boys.

    But yellow boys lose to white boys, black boys, brown boys, Jewish boys, etc.

    In Asia, it's mostly all Asian, so Asian girls got no choice. But look at Japan. Even when all are Asian, so many Japper girls don't want Japper guys who just give up on sex.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/20/young-people-japan-stopped-having-sex

    In the West, Asian girls are given choice and far more of them than white girls go with other race.

    So, give it up.

    You read but no breed... unless you go back home and bring girl from there... but then your daughter in the US no wanna marry a yelloid dork loser like you. Her womb go Amy Chua. Strictly for non-Asian men.

  157. Rdm says:
    @Priss Factor
    "In 2010 there were about 2000 Semi-Finalists in California, the state with the second highest Jewish population after New York. Citing an analysis of last names, Unz notes that there was only one Cohen, Levy, and Kaplan, but 49 Wangs and 36 Kims."

    Fred Fred Cabbage Head, the genetic thesis about Jewish intelligence is correct.

    I went to school with lots of Jews and some Asians in suburbs in the 80s.

    There were studious Jews and studious Asians. But generally Asians studied harder.
    But they were such grinds. Sure, some were real smart, but most were just reasonably bright who did a lot of studying and test-prepping. It was all about practice and preparation. Grind stuff.

    I recall on an individual basis, the Jewish kids were sharper, smarter, wittier. Some had brilliance, something totally missing from the yelloids.
    The Hindus are more fun, and they are in a category all their own, especially because India is nation of such extremes, with lots of very smart people and lots of very dumb people. With so much modernity and so much poverty, so much cosmopolitan experience and so much backward shitting with the cows outdoors.

    I must say of all the smart Jews and smart Asians of my high school class, the Jews did much more in life than the Asians even though some of them yelloids went to MIT, Harvard, University of Chicago.
    Look at Silicon Valley. Yelloids rarely rise above middle management. Some say Bamboo Ceiling, but it's more like Bamboo limit. These yelloids got no spark.

    Look at music. Jews were prominent as pianists and fiddlers. And then, Asians took over many classical music stuff.
    But what does that prove? It means Asians can succeed a grind stuff. To become good at classical music, you practice, practice, and practice, like Yo Mama and Ling Lang.

    But have Asian-Americans achieved creative original stuff in music in America? Where is Asian Bob Dylan, Carole King, Philip Glass, Paul Simon, etc?
    To be sure, there may be prominent and important Asian composers in Asia, but why not here? It goes to show Jews have confidence and strong personality even when they are a minority. In contrast, Asians may have confidence when surrounded by own kind but just go along when surrounded by others.

    It's funny. You'd think Asians would be more grindlike and conformist in Asia than in the West. I hear Asian school system is pretty rice-grueling. But because Asians are surrounded by other Asians in Asia, maybe they got some cultural confidence and have more guts to be original and individualistic, at least in creative fields.
    Consider some of the very great Japanese film makers and authors and such folks. In the West, Asians as individuals may have more freedom but they seem to lack cultural confidence. So, their individualism amounts to little more than imitating rappers, standup comics, and stuff. This is where Jews are different. Even when outnumbered by goyim, Jews just do their own stuff and break new ground.

    Comparing Jews and Asians are not fair because there are many Asian immigrants than Jewish ones. I'll bet many of the top asian students in California are children of immigrants. But this only points to Asian weakness. Asian-American achievement depends on immigration. Why? Asian-American birthrates are lower than even white Americans. Also, with huge intermarriage rates, Asian-Americanness will fade away. There is a lot of Jewish intermarriage with goyim too, but because Jewishness has prestige, even someone who is part-Jewish may identify as Jewish. But someone who is part-Asian will likely identify with other races, not least because intermariage rates are higher with Asian women. Children naturally identify more with father who is the authority figure in the household.

    With very low birthrates in Asia and among Asian-Americans, immigration will further dry up Asian demographics and those that come here will either die childless or intermarry and their kids will become unAsian.

    Now, because China is such a huge country with so many people, it might be different for Chinese than for Japanese and Koreans.
    But China too is in demographic freefall.

    In the end, I think the world will be overrun by two peoples: Hindus and Africans. India still has lots of kids, and Indian government plans to send gazillions all over the world. African birthrate is over the top, and Europe will be Africanized(there's no stopping it now) and US is also taking in tons of black Africans.

    Even Japan and Korea may take in the Negroes and dotters. China took in a whole bunch of Africans. Remember US just brought 300,000 blacks and they are now 50 million. The 1 million Africans in China may grow to 50 million in a century with every negress having 8 kids after gorging on dumplings and mooshoo pork.

    So, when it comes to the future, I bet on Hindus and Africans.

    Europeans are finished. Russia may be only white nation that survives.

    East Asia with their declining birthrates will be overrun with dotters and jivers, especially because the main culture of Japan and Korea and Taiwan and Philippines is black rap music and imitating American Diversity. Also, the Asian-American community of all these folks are totally Americanized and with social networking via internet, their compatriots are totally becoming Americanized even without coming here.

    I know a Filo girl who communicates via internet with friends and family back in Filo-land as if they are next door neighbors. From what I heard from her, culture in Manila is like culture in LA. Trashy and global.

    Globalism means the world turned into Hollywood and MTV. Since US is cool and since 'diversity' is cool, the new generation of Asians, like Europeans, will demand more immigration and more emigration. As their people move to US and Canada, their own nations will make up for people-shortage by bringing tons of dotters and jivers.

    haha…

    Every time I read the Dominique comments, I laughed.

    Added with Joe Webb’s, you have the Shakespeare play.

    We need these two old WASP guys here in comments, to have the comments flowing.

    Read More
  158. Rdm says:
    @Gene Su
    It's the Tiger Mom (and Dad) phenomenon. Let's talk about some ways that Asians are different from other ethnicities.
    1. Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don't go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter).
    2. Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don't see it as a sign of low rank. Thomas Sowell has written once that the laziness of black and white southerners has to do with the view that having to do manual labor was a disgrace. I have dealt with so many Asian VPs handling their own products and sweeping their floors.
    3. Asian parents force their kids to study. My mom won't let me out of the house until I spelled every word on the flash cards correctly.
    4. Asian parents will switch schools if they believe that their kid was not being educated. Sympathizers of blacks talk about how they are trapped in failing schools. Let's take that as true. Why is it I don't see the majority of blacks taking their kids out of failing schools? Only a minority, however large, will pay a private school tuition or drive across town to a charter school. Asian parents will pinch every penny to send their kids to a private school.
    5. Asian kids tend to be more introverted. Introverted nerds tend to be into science and math.

    This is a knee jerk comment to feel good.

    1. Asians tend to be far more stingy. They don’t go for flashy cars and houses as whites do (although clothes are another matter).

    Geeezuus. Freaking lies.

    2. Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don’t see it as a sign of low rank. Thomas Sowell has written once that the laziness of black and white southerners has to do with the view that having to do manual labor was a disgrace. I have dealt with so many Asian VPs handling their own products and sweeping their floors.

    You mean Sewage VP?

    No VP will sweep their floors, you idiots. Or maybe self-employed Asian restaurant owner?

    3. Asian parents force their kids to study. My mom won’t let me out of the house until I spelled every word on the flash cards correctly.

    That’s your mom. I self study and my parents didn’t force me to study and yet, I stood among the Top 1%.

    Read More
  159. Seraphim says:
    @Rehmat
    No Fred Jewish population has not declined in the United States. Some of the Jews, though, have adopted Christian names to penetrate political and religious establishments in order to destroy Christian world from within. For example, John Kerry, president Eisenhower, John Bolton, Archbishop of Canterbury and Pope John Paul II, to name a few. Even some western writers have insisted that Adolf Hitler, Adolf Eichmann, Attaturk were Crypto Jews.

    If one believes the 'Six Million Died' story or Talmud's narrative of "four billion Jews were killed by Romans" - there are over 13 million Jews are still living around the world mostly in Occupied Palestine, United States, France and Argentina.

    Chinese never killed a single Jew for political reason - but the have killed hundreds of thousands of native Muslims in China.

    China has very close relations with the Zionist entity, especially in arms and other technically fields. According to Newsweek, Chinese businessmen learn how to made more profit by studying Talmud.

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/01/28/israel-seeks-russia-china-help-to-ward-off-war-with-iran/

    @Muslim natives in China

    You mean natives of China who became Muslims.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    Do you mean any Native who convert to Islam loses his/her Native status?

    How come when Lord Goldsmith's daughter converted to Islam and married Pakistan's Cricket Team Captain Imran Khan, she didn't lose her British Native status? Her brother Zak Goldsmith was recently defeated by Sadiq Khan to become Mayor of London.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/04/20/london-mayoral-election-and-uks-muslim-problem/
  160. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @AaronB
    Good noticng, Fred.

    It has been obvious for some time that the facts about IQ are murky. For instance, IQ proponets love to tell us IQ is well correlated to life success, which is true, but then so is ambition. How much of what IQ measures is simply ambition? I'd wager a fairly large percentage. So simple a concept, potentially so important, yet so rarely given any attention!

    Jewish over performance was never just about IQ, as statistically speaking, there were always way more high IQ whites in the country. There was always an intangible factor that loomed huge and enormous but no one could quite identify.

    Its not just IQ. The problem extends to all supposedly stable geneticaly heritable traits on a national level, which simply refuse to stay stable over time despite the best efforts of our best scientists to insist they should do so.

    The Germans were the sleepy, dreamy poets and thinkers of Europe for a long time, with an actual reputation for dishonesty and shoddy workmanship (!) for a while, and poor discipline.

    What happened to stable genetic traits that are heritable? Oh my.

    In the 19th cent, the popular tropes had it as, lazy, slothful Asians, and energetic westerners.

    Where did THAT go? Lazy chinese indeed.

    But as Steve Sailer says in another context, you're not supposed to notice any of this stuff, because it threatens the attempt to erect a clear, simple, deterministic, picture of human nature scientists have been trying to establish for some time now.

    You can't measure ambition, or other intangibles, so we all preferred to sweep these disagreeable little details under the rug in order to make tidy little narrative.

    The temper of the age is scientistic, so we ignore messy details and intangibles.

    The result is clarity at the expense of accuracy, simplicity and perhaps control at the sacrifice of understanding.

    At this point in time, it's impose be to know the true differences in intelligence between groups. You tourself, Fred, have noticed that Mexicans ate far more intelligent than clueless Americans think, and I've noticed the same thing with all my third world travels.

    What if Mexicans simply don't try very hard on IQ tests? How would we know this, how would we measure this?

    I'm Jewish, and was a national merit semifinalist from new york. I showed up to the test completely unaware it was that day, after a night of partying, and completely bungled the math section while doing great on English. My life was a shambles at that time anyways and i wasn't laying any attention to math. If I were chinese, is there any doubt my parents would organize my whole life around doing great on that test?

    As a Jew, I know tons of clever and capable Jews, but the smartest people I've ever met were whites. What gives? Mere anecdote? Maybe.

    These non wrstern people are not as stupid as we think, far from it, and the reason they are not more advanced is because they simply have different priorities.

    Americans cannot understand how anyone can prefer a life that doesn't involve being an advanced industrial economy. They are sure that if some countries fail at that, it can only be because of stupidity. Yet everything is a sacrifice, and how much have we lost in the West by becoming mere consumers in an an industrial economy? Yet we cannot imagine that other people may not be so eager to make that exchange. Of course, Americans are fools, so what can we expect?

    IQ tests themselves do not determine someone’s future or worth as a person, but the IQ tests themselves are accurate. They are a measure is someone’s cognitive ability. That’s it.

    To say that Mexicans merely don’t try hard on the IQ test so add 20 IQ points or that Jews are out partying the night before so add another 40 points to Jewish IQ is rediculous.

    Meanwhile subtract 20 IQ points from the Chinese since all they do is study for IQ tests day and night.

    These arguments are standard arguments when white people are confronted with higher Chinese IQ and feel threatened.

    First they deny the validity of the IQ test, then when that doesn’t work they say IQ doesn’t matter. Why? Reasons lol.

    Meanwhile white people sure do like using IQ to show superiority against blacks and hispanics. I guess then IQ tests are accurate and relevant lol.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    I agree that whites are wrong in using IQ tests to feel superior to many other groups. I made that clear.

    I don't know what you were talking about, but I was talking about the ways IQ fails to be accurate.

    If you wish to ignore the mounting incongruities, you have a perfect right to do so, and indeed you will have the establishment at your back, for a time at least. Good luck to you.

    IQ tests obviously measure motivation and priorities related to an industrial economy as well as intelligence, and to what extent these factors can be separated no one knows, because we preferred to ignore these messy details.

    Again, I completely respect your rght to ignore these facts if you wish to.
  161. Che Guava says:
    @Jacques Sheete
    Here we go again with Freddy's mindless obsession about IQ and intelligence and who has it and who doesn’t, yadda yadda yadda.

    “Years ago, when I was tech writer,… bla, blah, blah…”

     

    Wowza, I’m impressed and humbled all at once. Since yer so smart, I guess I’d better lissen up, eh? I better take yer evry werd as Gospel er sumpin cuz yer obviously my superior. I'm surprised you didn't tell us agin how smart you must be cuz yerown daddy wuz a mathemutician fer da navy, and it’s in da jeans ;) ‘n sech.

    Anyway, as any half wit can see, treating Jews as an ethnic group is pretty mindless since Judaism is a proselytizing religion. That means that Jews can be of any race or ethnicity just as Christians can. I guess even a fella with a high IQ (in Freddy's case that obviously means Idiot Quotient) can ascertain what that means.

    Freddy, may I suggest you get someone to read and explain Sand's book to you?

    “The Invention of the Jewish People,” first published in Hebrew in Israel with the title, Matai ve’ech humtza ha’am hayehudi?, is by Shlomo Sand, Professor of History at Tel Aviv University.

    It explains and clarifies a lot about Zionism as well as “Semitism.”

    The book was a bestseller in Israel for several months …

    http://mondoweiss.net/2011/12/new-york-times-implies-anti-zionism-is-anti-semitic.html
    Here’s more:

    "Countering official Zionist historiography, Sand questions whether the Jewish People ever existed as a national group with a common origin in the Land of Israel/Palestine. He concludes that the Jews should be seen as a religious community comprising a mishmash of individuals and groups that had converted to the ancient monotheistic religion but do not have any historical right to establish an independent Jewish state in the Holy Land. In short, the Jewish People, according to Sand, are not really a “people” in the sense of having a common ethnic origin and national heritage. They certainly do not have a political claim over the territory that today constitutes Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, including Jerusalem.”

    http://inventionofthejewishpeople.politics.webfactional.com/

    As I have mentioned before, the state broadcaster (NHK) demonstrates that bagels have a southtwest Asian origin in their documentary series The Silk Road. I do not recall if it was Tajikistan or Uzbekistan, but the bakers were clearly making ur-bagels

    Judaism is a proselytizing religion.

    That is a lie, and you know it, Reform Judaism to an extent, Cabbalists to an extent (say, to the extent that they can recruit Madonna or, at times, garden-variety occultists).

    Otherwise, men who marry shiksas (yes, I know it is a nasty word, also know enough to know that it is a commom term of abuse) are not Jewish unless the shiksa or man are suffiently important or wealthy.

    Otherwise, the definition is purely maternal line.

    This applies to the international legal and illegal work network, too.

    I was pleased to see the Japanese govt. crack down on it over ten years ago.

    They did many really bad things, just from what I saw and what they said and complained about.

    Read More
  162. George says:

    The article uses the word Jew in a way that describes the word when Reed was growing up. Basically secular assimilated Ashkenazi central European more often than not Germanic Jews. These days you now have many dissimilar groups like Persian Jews, Issac Larian the Bratz dolls guy is America’s #1 Jew in my book. He’s not Bobby Fischer or Feynman but what are you going to do. Actually an Iranian born American woman won the fields prize, she has not commented on anything, but if I had to guess she is of Jewish heritage due to her name, Miriam, and her being in California. I suspect in the future the largest Jewish subgroup will be orthodox. Orthodox groups are not the same, and each Jew is an individual, but I think you will find they are quite different from secular Ashkenazi central European more often than not Germanic Jews.

    True Torah Jews (against Zionism): http://www.truetorahjews.org/
    True Torah Jews never forget, especially the way Zionists insulted them over the years. The Satmar and Neturei Karta cannot be considered a cult anymore because they are too numerous. True Torah Jews is a political organization, not a Jewish sect.

    As a note Bobby Fischer and Feynman not to mention others like Herb Alpert, Philip Roth, and Gary Marshall plus a bunch of others were distinctly secular and assimilated into what was at the time America’s still functional working class.

    and oh yeah, why when they have Jewish talking heads on the tv blabbing about Iran, why no Iranian Jews? We got plenty of Iranian Jews. Smart Iranian Jews. They might have more Iranians, but we have better Iranians…..

    Read More
    • Replies: @5371
    [if I had to guess she is of Jewish heritage due to her name, Miriam, and her being in California]

    top kek
  163. dahoit says:
    @Ron Unz
    Actually, I think these critiques of China's prospects are just total MSM nonsense/propaganda, much like how the old USSR used to endlessly critique America's dreadful economic problems during the 1970s and 1980s.

    Sure, all the MSM headlines endlessly tout China's terrible "economic slowdown"...except that even during this so-called "slowdown" China's per capita GDP has been increasing at roughly 10x America's rate. Here's a handy chart from one of my old articles from a few years ago you might want to consider reading especially since none of the trends have changed all that much:



    http://www.unz.com/article/chinas-rise-americas-fall/

    The real income of urban Chinese workers has been doubling every 5-10 years. It seems to me if the real income of ordinary American workers were doubling every decade, there'd be far fewer complaints about the One Percent.

    Commenters who endlessly ridicule the absurd claims of the MSM on some matters should be more cautious in blindly believing it on other matters.

    Stop the nonsense people.Asians are smart hard working citizens,who add greatly to our nation.
    Has anyone seen the pictures that were in the Graun a few months ago on the transformation of the Pearl River Delta?
    Unbelievable.
    And we get shite.
    The only maglev we ever had was taken out of Disney World years ago.
    And no they don’t do current shitey pop music.

    Read More
  164. dahoit says:
    @WhatEvvs
    Well, you certainly have a lot to say about the Jews, so have you done any reading? Where is it written that the children of Jewish fathers/Chinese mothers will grow up Jewish?

    The majority of children of Jewish fathers/non-Jewish mothers do not grow up Jewish, quite apart from the fact that they are not considered Jewish by Judaic law. They just drift away. I see this everywhere, in my own family and others.

    The Jewish future is in the ultra-Orthodox.

    Yep,Chinese mothers preclude Israeli citizenship.Unless the right rabbi concerts them.

    Read More
  165. biz says:
    @Jacques Sheete
    Here we go again with Freddy's mindless obsession about IQ and intelligence and who has it and who doesn’t, yadda yadda yadda.

    “Years ago, when I was tech writer,… bla, blah, blah…”

     

    Wowza, I’m impressed and humbled all at once. Since yer so smart, I guess I’d better lissen up, eh? I better take yer evry werd as Gospel er sumpin cuz yer obviously my superior. I'm surprised you didn't tell us agin how smart you must be cuz yerown daddy wuz a mathemutician fer da navy, and it’s in da jeans ;) ‘n sech.

    Anyway, as any half wit can see, treating Jews as an ethnic group is pretty mindless since Judaism is a proselytizing religion. That means that Jews can be of any race or ethnicity just as Christians can. I guess even a fella with a high IQ (in Freddy's case that obviously means Idiot Quotient) can ascertain what that means.

    Freddy, may I suggest you get someone to read and explain Sand's book to you?

    “The Invention of the Jewish People,” first published in Hebrew in Israel with the title, Matai ve’ech humtza ha’am hayehudi?, is by Shlomo Sand, Professor of History at Tel Aviv University.

    It explains and clarifies a lot about Zionism as well as “Semitism.”

    The book was a bestseller in Israel for several months …

    http://mondoweiss.net/2011/12/new-york-times-implies-anti-zionism-is-anti-semitic.html
    Here’s more:

    "Countering official Zionist historiography, Sand questions whether the Jewish People ever existed as a national group with a common origin in the Land of Israel/Palestine. He concludes that the Jews should be seen as a religious community comprising a mishmash of individuals and groups that had converted to the ancient monotheistic religion but do not have any historical right to establish an independent Jewish state in the Holy Land. In short, the Jewish People, according to Sand, are not really a “people” in the sense of having a common ethnic origin and national heritage. They certainly do not have a political claim over the territory that today constitutes Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, including Jerusalem.”

    http://inventionofthejewishpeople.politics.webfactional.com/

    Judaism is a proselytizing religion.

    It is difficult to get more incorrect than that.

    The rest of the comment attempts to, by flogging Shlomo Sand’s bit of ahistorical gibberish. But still, getting the one defining characteristic of Judaism 180 degrees wrong – wow.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    No it is not,and might be the most xenophobic religion in existence.
    If saying BS makes you feel better,go right ahead and spew.
    , @5371
    If Judaism was never a proselytizing religion, moron, then all Jews everywhere would be very similar in genotype.
  166. dahoit says:
    @Chris Mallory

    Thomas Sowell has written once that the laziness of black and white southerners has to do with the view that having to do manual labor was a disgrace.
     
    In this instance Sowell has no clue what he is talking about. I have never met a Southerner, black or white, who looked down on manual labor. But when you have temperatures in the mid to upper 90's and humidity levels in the mid 90's, sitting under the shade tree makes a whole lot of sense.

    Yes,strange comment.What else do they have down south to do but manual labor?It’s not a hotbed of wall street,banksters or lawyerdom pencil pushing.

    Read More
  167. dahoit says:
    @Anonymous
    Asians are still very very far from competing with Jews

    in calling the 'Elites' 'To Arms' because 'It's Time To Rise Up Against The Ignorant Masses' with the intensity of hatred of one and several thousands James Traubs.

    in founding and running things like the Southern Poverty LC which "fight hate" opposing to it a much stronger and higher quality and quantity of hate, in choosing where the next war will be waged: we didn't have Asians in the Ukraine, in those eventful days where the country's new government needed be chosen; we don't even have 4 Asians in the Supreme Court yet.

    in the sports of white-spitting and anti-white racism inciting — today's America's #1 sport, practiced in any Tv programs, in nearly every page of thw NYT's and WaPo's, and at a lower level in ordinary social media posting, disproving the anti-Semitic stereotype that Jews aren't good at sports.

    In feeling a divine call to determine the destiny of the remaining 98% of peoples, starting from the political life and election, healing the voter's mind when they may vote or have just voted wrong.

    They also seem to have no complexes of superiority, or at least to lack the dedication to making sure that everybody else understands how superior they are.

    You see, Asians are still way behind other groups, when it comes to achievement.
    ----------------------
    I also want to suggest you, Mr. Reed, that you think of your worship of intelligence a bit.

    Intelligence is a human faculty that harms both when lacking and when in excess.
    Excessive intelligence is going to transform humans into blends of human and machine, many already live in symbiosis with their electronic devices, absorbed by these.

    I see that, like "beauties" obsess over intelligence and spend their life taking pictures of themselves (now that taking pictures is a cost-less activity), some very intelligent people see intelligence at the centre of the universe and being. It's as wrong as that.

    Sympathy for the pain of every living being, and a wish for peace, should be at the centre of the human mind's landscape, maybe?

    The best baseball pitcher I ever saw,for 6? years,was Sandy Koufax.And I say that as a Yankee fan.He killed us in 63.
    Yes they can play sports,just not a lot of them historically.But with the rising salaries,many Jews do play sports today,its lucrative,more so then doctoring or lawyering in most cases.

    Read More
  168. dahoit says:
    @biz

    Judaism is a proselytizing religion.
     
    It is difficult to get more incorrect than that.

    The rest of the comment attempts to, by flogging Shlomo Sand's bit of ahistorical gibberish. But still, getting the one defining characteristic of Judaism 180 degrees wrong - wow.

    No it is not,and might be the most xenophobic religion in existence.
    If saying BS makes you feel better,go right ahead and spew.

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz
    It is clear that you don't know what proselytizing means. Here's a clue: It should have some amount of inverse correlation with how xenophobic a religion is.

    I know its an SAT-type word and that you don't encounter many of those in Pakistan, but google is your friend and all.
  169. dahoit says:
    @Hbd investor
    I don't think empty wombs will be a problem

    The Chinese government has absolute power, and lack of morals.

    If empty wombs are a problem the ccp would solve it immediately by offering tax cuts to the families with children and implementing pregnancy leaves along with propaganda to have more children.

    The reason why China's population exploded from 200 million at the end of ww2 to 1.4 billion was because Mao believed that ww3 was coming and they needed as many people as possible to increase their chances of winning a nuclear war.

    If the Communists could create 1.2 billion people with a snap of a finger there is no reason why they can't do it again

    Chinese lack of morals?Please elucidate the rest of us on that claim.
    Our jails are filled with them right?Serial liars all,huh?sheesh.
    Mao was the one who started the one child policy,didn’t he?And I’m sure he had the smarts to know nobody wins a nuclear war.
    Mao was the giant of Chinese history who rescued his nation from imperialism.
    Wo his influence,they’d still be in the boxer rebellion under mandarins fighting invasion.

    Read More
  170. Rdm says:
    @Priss Factor
    Jews and Asians are like blacks and whites in sports.

    You see good number of whites in college level football and basketball, but when it comes to the pros, blacks totally dominate.

    Likewise, at college level, Asians have lot of firepower.
    But when it comes to true innovation and creativity after college, Jews dominate.

    Education is about mastering accumulated knowledge. It depends a lot on effort and practice. Asians can do that.

    But real achievement is about creating something new, thinking something no one did before, and going to where no man has gone before. It requires spark, inspiration(than mere perspiration).

    Asians are good at learning about everything in settled space.
    Jews are much better at discovering uncharted territories.

    You’re comparing apples and oranges.

    Black dominates sport. But they don’t know shit about strategy and game tactics. If you bet on King James, Kobe, etc etc shooting 2 points, 3 points all day long, you’d win for sure.

    Kobe can hit 85 points in a single game alone, nothing short of MVP qualities. But just group any Blacks into a team, and let them run on their own, you’d get a disaster.

    If you ask a Black linemen to run a mile, he will run like an Usain Bolt.

    Any strategy, long term game plan, Blacks miserably fail it.

    Blacks don’t create the Basketball game, Blacks don’t come up with football tactics. They use their body. That’s it.

    On the other hand, East Asians create their own games and master them. East Asian create their own version of games.

    Look at this music.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85Fc2amPf34

    Would be highly valued in East Asia and emotionally cathartic to ears. But the value is just a paltry $0.02 cent.

    This? Uncle Sam allowance to Black community make it millions worth, and all the gibberish.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNkMfRjFZ6M

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19nm5_nAwQg

    Navajo-Ute musician R. Carlos Naka

    Chinese music will become culture-cided/ Americanized just as African rhythms
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEwnHf9Q23k
    became Hollywoodized.

    re Jews not proselytizers? Whaddya call Hollywood. Mormons go door-to-door in multiple countries. Jews are more efficient, they proselytize their view of the world digitally.

    Netanyahu told Congress it should "beam Hollywood programs into Iran, let young Iranians see the clothes and cars & swimming pools -- 'that's subversive.' "
    That's culturecide.
    , @Obamadon_Imbecilis
    Lebron's not a tactical player? At this stage in his career his game is largely focused around driving to the basket and either getting a dunk/layup or kicking it out for a 3 pointer. Such an approach is based around the fact that those are the two most efficient shots in basketball, and he's been a large part of driving the NBA towards that and away from chucking inefficient long 2's like Kobe, Melo, etc. He also doesn't strike me as particularly stupid, as he's been able to manage his money well and has had enough impulse control to stay out of trouble. Granted I don't necessarily think he's a super-genius, but he's most certainly not an example of an athlete who's too stupid to adhere to basic game tactics.
  171. tbraton says:
    @Che Guava
    Japan still has the greatest high-speed rail system in the world. Also the first.

    China's may already be more extensive for distance (can't be bothered to check, but likely true by now, given the greater distances), but hardly a network, so far a high incident rate, and much of the tech. and know-how is pilfered from here (and I would guess to a lesser extent, France).

    The network here can't really be called a network, The hub is very much Tokyo. In a few regional cities, there are switches, where the train is split, and the parts go on to different destinations.

    There is a plan to make Osaka a second hub, but I have no idea how that is supposed to fit in with the planned Tokyo-to-Osaka maglev.

    The current theoretical maximum for splitting trains is about three times, but the trains only have two destinations, at least the last time I rode one, so I think the switching is limited to two .

    I like the slow trains, and recent policy has been to make a consortium of prefectural govt.and existing local private lines take over lines where the bullet trains run on different lines, with Japan Rail holding a share.

    Where the bullet trains run on existing lines, so are only as fast as the special expresses they replaced, the slow trains run three to five times a day.

    but, if it’s not economical, it won’t last, and it will cost you unnecessarily as it diverts money to uneconomic goals
     
    Indeed, the airport-to-city maglev in China has a strong scent of white elephant about it.

    The new bullet-train services to Hokkaido (particularly) and to the sth.-west are not well-patronised most of the time, the old combinations of all-stops, commuter express in some places at some times, and special express did a better job.

    Concorde, wish I'd ridden it once, closest I'd ever be to space, an economy window seat would have been pricey, but just affordable, a small life regret. At least I saw a real Tu 144 landing, once. Think I never saw a Concorde, except in the sky once, maybe that was also a Tupolev.

    Che guava, you obviously know much more than I about high-speed trains, but it seems you share my skepticism about the benefits of those technological marvels. BTW, in contrast to the SST, I would point out that the airliners made the switch from old dependable prop planes to jets in the late 50′s-early 60′s not simply because of the time savings but because the jets were more fuel efficient than the props, as I understand it. Thus, it all boils down to economics.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    tbraton,

    Thx.

    but it seems you share my skepticism about the benefits of those technological marvels.

     

    To an extent, sure. I am unsure about the utility of some lines, but the first, Tokyo to Osaka, then to Fukuoka, seems to be useful.

    Won't go into route-by-route details, but I'd prefer it if the latest ones weren't there. So many factors. In Aomori, for example, the area around Aomori station is charming, but the bullet-train station is a desert, soulless, nothing around but the fake-trad. mini-mall below the platforms.

    Even if I have a ticket that allows unlimited bullet-train, special-express riding in an area, I will always check the all-stops lines that I have never seen before. Many surprises, much beautiful scenery, interesting places, much better than flying past them t in a second or so.

    Economics is not the dominator of experience, unless one is at the extreme in either direction in terms of ecoomic dominance (very poor or a plutocrat).

    As for prop. vs.jet, the prop. seems still to be the more efficient (or economical, as you would put it), on relatively short-haul flights, with only a few tens of passengers.
  172. 5371 says:
    @biz

    Judaism is a proselytizing religion.
     
    It is difficult to get more incorrect than that.

    The rest of the comment attempts to, by flogging Shlomo Sand's bit of ahistorical gibberish. But still, getting the one defining characteristic of Judaism 180 degrees wrong - wow.

    If Judaism was never a proselytizing religion, moron, then all Jews everywhere would be very similar in genotype.

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz
    1) Jews everywhere are have similarities in genotype to a certain extent.*

    2) Proselytizing does not mean the same thing as occasionally accepting coverts

    * NB I am not interested in rehashing with you how Y-chromosomes imply much more about a population's relative ancestry fraction than any particular individual's. You either understand it or you don't.
    , @Karl
    > If Judaism was never a proselytizing religion, moron, then all Jews everywhere would be very similar in genotype.

    Druze religion is not only non-prosletyzing, but there's no such thing as in-conversion AT ALL.

    Hasn't stopped their men from marrying whoever they feel like. Go visit the Druze villages in Galilee to see the results. There is SOME small percentage of Ethiopian girls who are VERY hot, so I suppose it will eventually happen. Anyway, Ethiopians can vary all over the place in phenotype. An Ethiopian girl can be pretty darn Cauc looking.

    Druze women are NOT subject to death for marrying out - but it's extremely rare.

    There's a decent size Druze poulation in the USA. They exercise a lot of caution for the sake of their relatives who live in Muslim countries - Israel ( a good size Druze population which has even reached the inner circles of the Security Organs) is always written as "The Holy Land".

    As my IDF drill instructor told me: "it's all pink on the inside".
    , @tbraton
    Having just read Shlomo Sands' book, his contention is that Judaism was a proselytizing religion for a brief spell (couple of hundred years) in the early part of the first part of the first millennium A.D., but is not now. That's how he explains the spread of Jews around the Roman Empire, not the expulsion of the Jews from Israel, most of whom remained there. The latter thought had occurred to me when I read Tacitus 50 years ago, and he spoke of the Romans destroying Jerusalem and prohibiting Jews from living in Jerusalem from that point on. Prohibition from living in Jerusalem did not seem the same to me as prohibition from living in Israel. I had a hard time reconciling what Tacitus said with what I was hearing and reading about the total exile of the Jews from the "Promised Land."
  173. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website
    @Anonymous
    Lol.

    You sound like a bitter white guy. If you wanna site DQ sorry to say that the brothers got everyone beat there as millions of white women can attest to.

    You can try to claim whites have more game than asians, but everyone else has more game than white people do. This is why white women mix with other races so frequently.

    And unlike China, America has that diversity that I'm sure makes you so happy.

    Glad to see you quit on the IQ angle by the way.

    So, white boys lose to black boys.

    But yellow boys lose to white boys, black boys, brown boys, Jewish boys, etc.

    In Asia, it’s mostly all Asian, so Asian girls got no choice. But look at Japan. Even when all are Asian, so many Japper girls don’t want Japper guys who just give up on sex.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/20/young-people-japan-stopped-having-sex

    In the West, Asian girls are given choice and far more of them than white girls go with other race.

    So, give it up.

    You read but no breed… unless you go back home and bring girl from there… but then your daughter in the US no wanna marry a yelloid dork loser like you. Her womb go Amy Chua. Strictly for non-Asian men.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Nope, only in the vapid West where culture does not matter will you see this happen. And white people will be hurt by this more than anyone else.

    America is a huge welfare state that is declining, so it is more likely that black guys and white guys who study game all day will not breed everyone else out of existence.

    If game and cock size was the only thing that mattered than why isn't the whole world black?

    Japan is the most Westernized country is Asia, but Japan is not foolish enough to import hordes of foreigners like America has. So the impact will be minimal.

    You bring up Amy Chua like it means something. The entire Kardashian family went dark, so hope you lock up your daughter or else she will pass on the dorky white boy who can't dance in favor of eggplant.

  174. @Priss Factor
    "In 2010 there were about 2000 Semi-Finalists in California, the state with the second highest Jewish population after New York. Citing an analysis of last names, Unz notes that there was only one Cohen, Levy, and Kaplan, but 49 Wangs and 36 Kims."

    Fred Fred Cabbage Head, the genetic thesis about Jewish intelligence is correct.

    I went to school with lots of Jews and some Asians in suburbs in the 80s.

    There were studious Jews and studious Asians. But generally Asians studied harder.
    But they were such grinds. Sure, some were real smart, but most were just reasonably bright who did a lot of studying and test-prepping. It was all about practice and preparation. Grind stuff.

    I recall on an individual basis, the Jewish kids were sharper, smarter, wittier. Some had brilliance, something totally missing from the yelloids.
    The Hindus are more fun, and they are in a category all their own, especially because India is nation of such extremes, with lots of very smart people and lots of very dumb people. With so much modernity and so much poverty, so much cosmopolitan experience and so much backward shitting with the cows outdoors.

    I must say of all the smart Jews and smart Asians of my high school class, the Jews did much more in life than the Asians even though some of them yelloids went to MIT, Harvard, University of Chicago.
    Look at Silicon Valley. Yelloids rarely rise above middle management. Some say Bamboo Ceiling, but it's more like Bamboo limit. These yelloids got no spark.

    Look at music. Jews were prominent as pianists and fiddlers. And then, Asians took over many classical music stuff.
    But what does that prove? It means Asians can succeed a grind stuff. To become good at classical music, you practice, practice, and practice, like Yo Mama and Ling Lang.

    But have Asian-Americans achieved creative original stuff in music in America? Where is Asian Bob Dylan, Carole King, Philip Glass, Paul Simon, etc?
    To be sure, there may be prominent and important Asian composers in Asia, but why not here? It goes to show Jews have confidence and strong personality even when they are a minority. In contrast, Asians may have confidence when surrounded by own kind but just go along when surrounded by others.

    It's funny. You'd think Asians would be more grindlike and conformist in Asia than in the West. I hear Asian school system is pretty rice-grueling. But because Asians are surrounded by other Asians in Asia, maybe they got some cultural confidence and have more guts to be original and individualistic, at least in creative fields.
    Consider some of the very great Japanese film makers and authors and such folks. In the West, Asians as individuals may have more freedom but they seem to lack cultural confidence. So, their individualism amounts to little more than imitating rappers, standup comics, and stuff. This is where Jews are different. Even when outnumbered by goyim, Jews just do their own stuff and break new ground.

    Comparing Jews and Asians are not fair because there are many Asian immigrants than Jewish ones. I'll bet many of the top asian students in California are children of immigrants. But this only points to Asian weakness. Asian-American achievement depends on immigration. Why? Asian-American birthrates are lower than even white Americans. Also, with huge intermarriage rates, Asian-Americanness will fade away. There is a lot of Jewish intermarriage with goyim too, but because Jewishness has prestige, even someone who is part-Jewish may identify as Jewish. But someone who is part-Asian will likely identify with other races, not least because intermariage rates are higher with Asian women. Children naturally identify more with father who is the authority figure in the household.

    With very low birthrates in Asia and among Asian-Americans, immigration will further dry up Asian demographics and those that come here will either die childless or intermarry and their kids will become unAsian.

    Now, because China is such a huge country with so many people, it might be different for Chinese than for Japanese and Koreans.
    But China too is in demographic freefall.

    In the end, I think the world will be overrun by two peoples: Hindus and Africans. India still has lots of kids, and Indian government plans to send gazillions all over the world. African birthrate is over the top, and Europe will be Africanized(there's no stopping it now) and US is also taking in tons of black Africans.

    Even Japan and Korea may take in the Negroes and dotters. China took in a whole bunch of Africans. Remember US just brought 300,000 blacks and they are now 50 million. The 1 million Africans in China may grow to 50 million in a century with every negress having 8 kids after gorging on dumplings and mooshoo pork.

    So, when it comes to the future, I bet on Hindus and Africans.

    Europeans are finished. Russia may be only white nation that survives.

    East Asia with their declining birthrates will be overrun with dotters and jivers, especially because the main culture of Japan and Korea and Taiwan and Philippines is black rap music and imitating American Diversity. Also, the Asian-American community of all these folks are totally Americanized and with social networking via internet, their compatriots are totally becoming Americanized even without coming here.

    I know a Filo girl who communicates via internet with friends and family back in Filo-land as if they are next door neighbors. From what I heard from her, culture in Manila is like culture in LA. Trashy and global.

    Globalism means the world turned into Hollywood and MTV. Since US is cool and since 'diversity' is cool, the new generation of Asians, like Europeans, will demand more immigration and more emigration. As their people move to US and Canada, their own nations will make up for people-shortage by bringing tons of dotters and jivers.

    Dominique Francon Society’s all horizons take sounds about right. I am an 82yo jew raised in brooklyn, and i continue to measure my self-worth. As Norman says somewhere, the questions he asks himself of someone are (1) is he stronger than I am? (2) smarter? (3) less queer? As anecdote is data, I feel justified to share my long experience. I have had some intercourse with the smarter than me crowd. I can name their names. Unfortunately, I have only known one Chinese well, an ex-neighbor, born in Malasia, educated in the US and currently employed by Apple. I conversed with him recently (he still owns the apartment) and he was in a glum mood, unhappy at work (his 3 children are growing up “without him” – his words). Aside his cultural limitations – which are huge and startling, he is smart enough to cope in the world, but he has intimations of not having full access to what is known or can be known. He is dissatisfied.

    As for the smarter than me crowd, many were jews, many were not; my sense is that Leroi Jones (later Amiri Baraka) was smarter than me. Having the top smarts is a gift of birth – assuming the gift is nurtured as the child grows up. Apparently Pres. Obama’s father was gifted in the same way, although he was unable to realize his potential. The racial/cultural distribution of the gift is an interesting puzzle, but ultimately trivial. Whatever their background, the smartest like everybody else must live their lives one at a time.

    i suspect that the smartest jewish kids now feel free in the world in a way that jews of past generations and their discomfort about who and where they were in the world. This was the pressure-cooker effect on achievement. So the Asian tiger mother style of child nurture has obvious salience. We should be comforted by the reflection that the smartest are driven by the desire for the honor of men and the love of fair women in a globalized world where all the ethnicities/cultures of the smartest are subsumed in the culture of post-Renaissance Europe. So what’s not to like?

    Read More
  175. dahoit says:
    @Discard
    Smart Jews did not go into physics because they just seemed to have a special affinity for it, they went for physics because it's a road to success that had objective standards. Jew or not, if you could do calculus or whatever, there was a place for you.

    OTOH, law and finance require a level of trust not readily extended to outsiders. Having become the insiders since WW2, smart Jews can make a lot more money from Harvard than MIT. The decline in Jewish scientific achievement is due to them taking the easier path of financial and legal manipulation. That's my guess anyway.

    Maybe its the collapse of Jewish enlightenment caused by the Zionist project.
    They are a bunch of nazis to illustrate that.
    Scientist never made much dough anyway,and the collapse of their humanity is cojoined with the lust for money,a most unenlightened enterprise to enlightened people.

    Read More
  176. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "The Orthodox I know are like the Amish. All their energies are devoted to family and maintenance of their traditions. You are not going to get any symphonies or bullet trains out of them."

    Speaking in absolutes is a sign of a fool.

    Except that what he said is entirely true.

    Sure, some of these Orthodox will still invent things or get their own sitcom, but the majority will be welfare bums just like black people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Except that what he said is entirely true."

    Among those he knows, perhaps.

    "Sure, some of these Orthodox will still invent things or get their own sitcom, but the majority will be welfare bums just like black people."

    You do realize Orthodox Jews have high IQ's and well-paying jobs, right? They're Jews, silly goose.
  177. wow, I am very impressed by some of the KKK level comments. and I love this website to death for allowing them :)

    GO fred!!!

    Read More
  178. dahoit says:
    @Anonymous
    Maybe there is a connection to the low birthrates among Reform Jewish women.

    Liberalism and feminism are self-limiting, luckily.

    Same with homosexuals,except lesbians go to the sperm bank of the male homosexuals,and procreate more homosexuals.Oy!My daddy was a test tube,and my mommy a navel gazer.
    What could be more illuminating on the banality of evil,fulfillment at child’s expense.

    Read More
  179. dahoit says:
    @pink_point
    "China has demonstrated the ability to control human behavior", says the reader you replied to.

    Does he know of some place where that is not the case? Is he/she reading and "watching" the USA-EU mainstream media af of late?

    Our current status of affairs comes from far in the past, at least 60 years.

    I pick one quote by one neuroscientists, one quote among countless quotes by Western, usually Anglo-Saxon, psychologists, psychiatrists, of the 20th century.

    "We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically manipulated. The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain."

    The 2 differences with China (and Russia) is their governors work for the good of their governed, and even liberty is going to find more space in their culture and society, whereas the West has slipped back to authoritarianism, and a menacious one at that: one in which the governers seem to loathe the governed, and work with all but their governed's interest in their mind.
    --------------

    Coming to your point on fertility, I see what you say, but what about birth rates in South Korea/Japan?
    Besides, I have read they are steeply falling in the Muslimsphere too, as well as in Israel.

    Regardless, I can't see anything "eugenicist" to such policies.

    ----------------------
    "Forty or fifty years ago, the Chinese government was far more ideological than its American counterpart, which led to all sorts of problems, but these days it is the American government which operates within a narrow ideological straightjacket."

    A naive observer would wonder why, if ideology and authoritarianism blight countries and hinder advancement, do governments allow themselves become ideological?

    But asking that question assumes free will, the free will of governments

    Anglo Saxon psychologists and psychiatrists?
    Other than a few women feminists,I’ve never seen one AS psych.
    Its a Jewish field,with a few Indians now entering it.
    And they have a full crop of lunatics to work with here,all supporting the hell bitch.

    Read More
  180. dahoit says:
    @Svigor

    Another of my friends has an Asian wife and thus entree into the Asian community. He quotes their (wisely private) outlook: “Whites are lazy and stupid.”
     
    Perhaps, but Whites are obviously superior at creating countries that Yellows want to live in. Yellows are clever and industrious, but they're also bland, conformist, and corrupt. We'd be wise to exclude them from our living spaces, ere Yellows make them as bland, conformist, and corrupt as their homelands.

    China is by far the world leader in high-speed rail, of which America has none.
     
    China needs advanced mass transit far more than we do. There's a billion of them packed into an area roughly the size of the 13 colonies. And their ant-hill-like lack of diversity (sorry, a globalist spirit came over me for a moment) means they can actually enjoy whatever mass transit they devise.

    “Asians tend not to balk from manual or undesirable labor. They don’t see it as a sign of low rank.”
     
    Jewry is the Galactic Headquarters for contempt for manual labor.

    The smartest Jews tend to be secular, and about half of secular Jews are marrying non-Jews, and most of the ones that do raise their kids non-Jewish. (1488 crowd shibboleths notwithstanding). When those kids grow up, they have some of the smart genes, (or all, if assortative mating is holding up). But they don’t have the Jewish label.
     
    What's funny is how Jews either trumpet or bemoan this supposedly epic level of Jewish tolerance (depending on their audience), but it's actually evidence of Jews' relative intolerance; imagine if Irish Catholics or Anglo-Saxons or Italians in America only married other whites at that rate. The NYT would be on them like stink on shit. Jews are easily the most endogamous white group in America.

    Wilson: Jews got one idea about lots of stuff: whether White "gentiles" are worthy of the rights Jews have (they aren't), whether it's okay to promote destructive liberalism and open borders for White "gentiles" while promoting the opposite for Jews (it is), whether Israel should survive as a Jewish supremacist apartheid state (it should), etc., etc., etc.

    Remember the old joke about how many poles(12?) to screw in a light bulb?
    Well they never mention there were 24 Jews giving them conflicted info on how to do it.
    Jews are the worst manual workers in this world,manual labor is undesirable,and slaves do all their dirty work.
    Of course there are a few exceptions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "Jews are the worst manual workers in this world,manual labor is undesirable,and slaves do all their dirty work."

    True

    https://youtu.be/YOaYkT6fsXg?t=1m45s
  181. dcite says:
    @Anonymous
    Asians want to come here because of the money. It's not culture that drives people here, be it asians or others.

    If whites immigrate somewhere en mass, it will be because somewhere else offers them better economic opportunity, not because of cultural reasons. You travel some place to experience the culture, you don't move.

    It used to be that America was rich because of the hard work of its people, now America is mainly rich because of momentum and dollar hedgemony. Both of which are becoming unwound.

    So a lot of Fred observed is based on whites just grasping for straws of how da chinaman's success is just smoke and mirrors and China will crumble.

    Mostly money, but that’s not enough reason nowadays, to explain it. Many are refugees from various kinds of cultural oppression — including some academics. But this “oppression” is not peculiar to Asians.
    The “culture” here is not all that different from developed parts of Asia at this point in history — and most come from developed areas. They are not peasants or street sweepers. Even in their own countries they are already more like us culturally, than we are like them. And yeah, I know that the similarity is sometimes surface and not representative of remote areas, but in general it is true comparatively, and it is what they feared for several centuries.
    T.F. Mou, Chinese horror movie director, made a film about Unit 731, “Men Behind the Sun,” the infamous Japanese concentration camp in northern China from which perhaps half a dozen out of thousands of hapless Chinese, emerged alive. In casting, he chose rural Koreans to play the Chinese because the faces, body language, general mein and manner, were simply too changed, he claimed, from the way Chinese would have looked and acted in the 1940s. This change didn’t just come from the marrow of their own bones. It came from elsewhere.

    Again: Asians can become generic Americans, Americans cannot become Chinese or Japanese. This is a choice. I do like a lot of Asian Americans — often good American citizens. I don’t see China crumbling. It’ll just go on like all countries do. I wish it well so that more its citizens stay where they are (I wish the same for every country, btw), but I’d like to see material production return here. However, economic primacy in any given area, goes in cycles, and they probably have peaked already.

    Read More
  182. dahoit says:
    @avraham
    There was a kind of synergy between Reason and Revelation. This was based to a large degree on European Jew's respect for Maimonides and the general Mediaeval approach which saw a strong connection between faith and reason. So there was plenty of motivation to see great good in STEM.

    They especially loved the part about the drowning goyim.(let him drown)

    Read More
  183. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Priss Factor
    So, white boys lose to black boys.

    But yellow boys lose to white boys, black boys, brown boys, Jewish boys, etc.

    In Asia, it's mostly all Asian, so Asian girls got no choice. But look at Japan. Even when all are Asian, so many Japper girls don't want Japper guys who just give up on sex.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/20/young-people-japan-stopped-having-sex

    In the West, Asian girls are given choice and far more of them than white girls go with other race.

    So, give it up.

    You read but no breed... unless you go back home and bring girl from there... but then your daughter in the US no wanna marry a yelloid dork loser like you. Her womb go Amy Chua. Strictly for non-Asian men.

    Nope, only in the vapid West where culture does not matter will you see this happen. And white people will be hurt by this more than anyone else.

    America is a huge welfare state that is declining, so it is more likely that black guys and white guys who study game all day will not breed everyone else out of existence.

    If game and cock size was the only thing that mattered than why isn’t the whole world black?

    Japan is the most Westernized country is Asia, but Japan is not foolish enough to import hordes of foreigners like America has. So the impact will be minimal.

    You bring up Amy Chua like it means something. The entire Kardashian family went dark, so hope you lock up your daughter or else she will pass on the dorky white boy who can’t dance in favor of eggplant.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "If game and cock size was the only thing that mattered than why isn’t the whole world black?"

    Because prior to globalism, each nation kept up its borders and had its own culture.

    But now we have huge migrations of people.

    And all nations worship Rap and image of Negro stud.

    Black Africa has 60 kids per women and all those black men are moving to Europe to blacken the race. Western media even promote that stuff and attack anyone who say 'white must remain white'.
    http://www.amren.com/features/2016/07/the-colonization-of-europe/


    And look how fast Asia is changing. Younger Japanese and Korons love Diversity. 80% are 'progressive'. They just follow west. Japan had as miss japan some woman whose father is black.
    Korea gets an African to run in Olympics as 'Korean' runner. For younger gen, 'racism' and 'homogeneity' are worst words.

    Yelloids have no culture except to imitate the West.

    Look at massive homo parades in japan, Korea, Vietnam.

    Hong Kong and Taiwan are ruled by globalists calling for diversity and homo stuff.

    Culture of young people in Asia is rap and homo stuff.

    Asians follow. since whites have 'white guilt' about blacks, jews, and homos, Asians feel they must adopt 'white guilt' on those matters because they think white way = development = progress. The human is associative. Since white nations are most advanced, yelloids think white way is correct on everything.

    China may be the ONLY asian nation that can resist this because it has national sovereignty.

    "The entire Kardashian family went dark, so hope you lock up your daughter or else she will pass on the dorky white boy who can’t dance in favor of eggplant."

    Kartrash is the #1 celebrity popular among white girls.
    So you see, white race is going black.
    Since yelloids imitate whites, they too go black or go-white-going-black.

    Yelloids have tons of plastic surgery to look white. But since white thing is now to favor mulattoization and since rap is the global music, yelloids will go the same way.

    And the thing is parents have no control over the kids. No can lock them up. Global freedom means girls all go groid.

  184. All that spiel and Fred still missed it. An obvious point, to which he appears to be completely obllivious, is simple: DEMOGRAPHICS. In short, Jews today, of this generation and onward, are simply not having large extended families while Asians are.

    If the typical Jewish family is only averaging about 1.4 children and the typical Chinese family is averaging 3-4 kids, over time, guess what? There will be fewer Jews, both in total numbers and as a percentage relative to the population which in turn will start to decrease their overall representation in various fields. In other words, having fewer and fewer children means you’ll start to see fewer Jews represented in the fields that they’re always tended to dominate while the Asians’ percentage continues to grow.

    Ironically, the one segment of Jewish groups that are growing, (averaging 2-3 kids above replacement) is the Orthodox, often just off the boat from Russia or even from Israel, the Hasidic Jews. Unfortunately, they don’t tend to be very represented among the top 1% in IQ, smarts, or income and often times will go on welfare. But their numbers are definitely growing, especially when compared to all other groups and sub set groups of Jews.

    Look it up, Fred. Demographics. It’s real and today’s Jews just simply aren’t having tons of offspring. Obviously, a group’s lack of total numbers will have a direct effect on their future dominance in various fields.

    Very surprised that Fred missed it. It’s really not that complicated. Having fewer babies = less dominance in various fields in the future.

    Read More
    • Replies: @5371
    Chinese families are no bigger on average than those of secular Jews.
  185. @martin_2
    There are 1.3 billion Chinese. There are roughly 50 million English. The average IQ of the Chinese is around 105, English is around 100. Yet I cannot think of one living Chinese mathematician or physicist of such renown as Roger Penrose, Stephen Hawking, Andrew Miles, John Conway, Alan Baker, Ben Green; except for Terence Tao.
    There must be something genetic going on.

    …I cannot think of one living Chinese mathematician or physicist of such renown as Roger Penrose, Stephen Hawking, Andrew Miles, John Conway, Alan Baker, Ben Green; except for Terence Tao. There must be something genetic going on.

    Elite English education, within the lifetimes of the men listed, was the best in the world. It was highly selective at an early age – not only the great “public” schools, but perhaps even more so, the grammar schools, which offered bright middle-class boys a similar quality of education. Those having the interest and ability could go on to Oxford or Cambridge, which follow the tutorial method, in which students receive individual instruction instead of just sitting through lectures with dozens or hundreds of others.

    While this (like other educational systems) produced many graduates of no great distinction, it was uniquely capable of identifying and cultivating the necessarily small number of its students who possessed first-rate intellects.

    An example of one who was not a mathematician was Enoch Powell, who famously went into an examination in Greek prose scheduled to last three hours, which set the task of translating a passage into Ancient Greek. He finished in an hour and a half, having produced two translations, one in the style of Thucydides and one in that of Plato. For this he won a rare double-starred first, and went on to become a professor of classics by the age of 25. When World War II broke out, he volunteered for service as a common soldier, and by the war’s end had risen to the rank of brigadier. After the war he went into politics, and was stopped short of becoming prime minister only by his “Rivers of Blood” speech (which alluded to a passage in Virgil), then derided as “racist” but now appearing prophetic.

    American higher education, and higher education in most of the rest of the world, just doesn’t cultivate such talents. Unfortunately, it is probable that neither does England’s, any more.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "American higher education, and higher education in most of the rest of the world, just doesn’t cultivate such talents."

    You would be decidedly in error.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_James_Leggett
  186. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website
    @Anonymous
    Nope, only in the vapid West where culture does not matter will you see this happen. And white people will be hurt by this more than anyone else.

    America is a huge welfare state that is declining, so it is more likely that black guys and white guys who study game all day will not breed everyone else out of existence.

    If game and cock size was the only thing that mattered than why isn't the whole world black?

    Japan is the most Westernized country is Asia, but Japan is not foolish enough to import hordes of foreigners like America has. So the impact will be minimal.

    You bring up Amy Chua like it means something. The entire Kardashian family went dark, so hope you lock up your daughter or else she will pass on the dorky white boy who can't dance in favor of eggplant.

    “If game and cock size was the only thing that mattered than why isn’t the whole world black?”

    Because prior to globalism, each nation kept up its borders and had its own culture.

    But now we have huge migrations of people.

    And all nations worship Rap and image of Negro stud.

    Black Africa has 60 kids per women and all those black men are moving to Europe to blacken the race. Western media even promote that stuff and attack anyone who say ‘white must remain white’.

    http://www.amren.com/features/2016/07/the-colonization-of-europe/

    And look how fast Asia is changing. Younger Japanese and Korons love Diversity. 80% are ‘progressive’. They just follow west. Japan had as miss japan some woman whose father is black.
    Korea gets an African to run in Olympics as ‘Korean’ runner. For younger gen, ‘racism’ and ‘homogeneity’ are worst words.

    Yelloids have no culture except to imitate the West.

    Look at massive homo parades in japan, Korea, Vietnam.

    Hong Kong and Taiwan are ruled by globalists calling for diversity and homo stuff.

    Culture of young people in Asia is rap and homo stuff.

    Asians follow. since whites have ‘white guilt’ about blacks, jews, and homos, Asians feel they must adopt ‘white guilt’ on those matters because they think white way = development = progress. The human is associative. Since white nations are most advanced, yelloids think white way is correct on everything.

    China may be the ONLY asian nation that can resist this because it has national sovereignty.

    “The entire Kardashian family went dark, so hope you lock up your daughter or else she will pass on the dorky white boy who can’t dance in favor of eggplant.”

    Kartrash is the #1 celebrity popular among white girls.
    So you see, white race is going black.
    Since yelloids imitate whites, they too go black or go-white-going-black.

    Yelloids have tons of plastic surgery to look white. But since white thing is now to favor mulattoization and since rap is the global music, yelloids will go the same way.

    And the thing is parents have no control over the kids. No can lock them up. Global freedom means girls all go groid.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    (((insert embarrassment emoticon)))

    what do you mean by "game" ?
    , @Anonymous
    Sounds like you spend too much time on the Internet and not enough time in the real world.

    Globalization, like you have seen in the West, is a distinctly Anglo and Jewish thing. No one else does it. The goal is to import a bunch of goyim or cattle to serve as the lower class to rule over.

    Again, no one else does this except for Anglo and Jewish socities. Asia can import workers, but they will not be Africans. They will be other asians like Phillipinos and not in huge numbers.

    While black culture has had an influence in Asia, it is no where near as impact full as it is with white people where you have people like Rachel Dozeal pretending to be chocolate when she us snow white.

    Fred mentioned this in the article. White people grasping at straws on why China will implode. Pure Schadenfreude.
  187. neutral says:

    Jews still run Hollywood (and the all the other mass entertainment) and finance, until I see evidence that the Chinese are taking these over, then this article is missing some key points on where true power sits. The Chinese along with other asians like Indians might be good worker bees in STEM, but being good at those does not mean very much these days.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "Jews still run Hollywood (and the all the other mass entertainment) and finance, until I see evidence that the Chinese are taking these over..."

    Many don't notice Jewish power cuz they are too busy celebrating homo this, tranny that, etc.

    Maybe the next big cause will be FAT ballerinas.

    It would be so INCLUSIVE.

    It never seems to occur to these people that things gain meaning by exclusion and discrimination.
    After all, the ballet ideal cannot be upheld if midgets and fatties were INCLUDED.

    If the weird and freaky are included into something well-defined by form, values, principles, and etc, then that something is undermined and subverted.

    If the military is about honor, then including open homos and trannies destroys honor. Open homosexuality is ewww and tranny stuff is laughable.

    It's like the validity of the notion of citizenship is lost if illegals are declared 'Americans'.

    And what happened to home loans when bad loans were bundled with good ones? Financial meltdown in 2008.

    It's like including garlic in ice cream messes it up.

    And if some people feel left out, well too bad. You can't always get what you want.

    For things to retain their standards and values, some things and peoples have to be excluded.

  188. 5371 says:
    @Yojimbo/Zatoichi
    All that spiel and Fred still missed it. An obvious point, to which he appears to be completely obllivious, is simple: DEMOGRAPHICS. In short, Jews today, of this generation and onward, are simply not having large extended families while Asians are.

    If the typical Jewish family is only averaging about 1.4 children and the typical Chinese family is averaging 3-4 kids, over time, guess what? There will be fewer Jews, both in total numbers and as a percentage relative to the population which in turn will start to decrease their overall representation in various fields. In other words, having fewer and fewer children means you'll start to see fewer Jews represented in the fields that they're always tended to dominate while the Asians' percentage continues to grow.

    Ironically, the one segment of Jewish groups that are growing, (averaging 2-3 kids above replacement) is the Orthodox, often just off the boat from Russia or even from Israel, the Hasidic Jews. Unfortunately, they don't tend to be very represented among the top 1% in IQ, smarts, or income and often times will go on welfare. But their numbers are definitely growing, especially when compared to all other groups and sub set groups of Jews.

    Look it up, Fred. Demographics. It's real and today's Jews just simply aren't having tons of offspring. Obviously, a group's lack of total numbers will have a direct effect on their future dominance in various fields.

    Very surprised that Fred missed it. It's really not that complicated. Having fewer babies = less dominance in various fields in the future.

    Chinese families are no bigger on average than those of secular Jews.

    Read More
  189. biz says:
    @dahoit
    No it is not,and might be the most xenophobic religion in existence.
    If saying BS makes you feel better,go right ahead and spew.

    It is clear that you don’t know what proselytizing means. Here’s a clue: It should have some amount of inverse correlation with how xenophobic a religion is.

    I know its an SAT-type word and that you don’t encounter many of those in Pakistan, but google is your friend and all.

    Read More
  190. Ah, but what about the political sphere. I notice that Foreign Affairs and its sponsor the CFR are now obsessed with Israeli/middle-east concerns, and most of their staffers appear to be Jewish. The Establishment wasps are not only in decline, but seem to have been dispossessed.

    “Corinth, oh Dorian Corinth, where is thy beauty now?”

    Should we or not lament?

    Read More
  191. 5371 says:
    @George
    The article uses the word Jew in a way that describes the word when Reed was growing up. Basically secular assimilated Ashkenazi central European more often than not Germanic Jews. These days you now have many dissimilar groups like Persian Jews, Issac Larian the Bratz dolls guy is America's #1 Jew in my book. He's not Bobby Fischer or Feynman but what are you going to do. Actually an Iranian born American woman won the fields prize, she has not commented on anything, but if I had to guess she is of Jewish heritage due to her name, Miriam, and her being in California. I suspect in the future the largest Jewish subgroup will be orthodox. Orthodox groups are not the same, and each Jew is an individual, but I think you will find they are quite different from secular Ashkenazi central European more often than not Germanic Jews.

    True Torah Jews (against Zionism): http://www.truetorahjews.org/
    True Torah Jews never forget, especially the way Zionists insulted them over the years. The Satmar and Neturei Karta cannot be considered a cult anymore because they are too numerous. True Torah Jews is a political organization, not a Jewish sect.

    As a note Bobby Fischer and Feynman not to mention others like Herb Alpert, Philip Roth, and Gary Marshall plus a bunch of others were distinctly secular and assimilated into what was at the time America's still functional working class.

    and oh yeah, why when they have Jewish talking heads on the tv blabbing about Iran, why no Iranian Jews? We got plenty of Iranian Jews. Smart Iranian Jews. They might have more Iranians, but we have better Iranians.....

    [if I had to guess she is of Jewish heritage due to her name, Miriam, and her being in California]

    top kek

    Read More
  192. biz says:
    @5371
    If Judaism was never a proselytizing religion, moron, then all Jews everywhere would be very similar in genotype.

    1) Jews everywhere are have similarities in genotype to a certain extent.*

    2) Proselytizing does not mean the same thing as occasionally accepting coverts

    * NB I am not interested in rehashing with you how Y-chromosomes imply much more about a population’s relative ancestry fraction than any particular individual’s. You either understand it or you don’t.

    Read More
    • Replies: @5371
    [to a certain extent]

    I would quote "Up to a point, Lord Copper" but you are probably not very familiar with English literature.
  193. @Rdm
    You're comparing apples and oranges.

    Black dominates sport. But they don't know shit about strategy and game tactics. If you bet on King James, Kobe, etc etc shooting 2 points, 3 points all day long, you'd win for sure.

    Kobe can hit 85 points in a single game alone, nothing short of MVP qualities. But just group any Blacks into a team, and let them run on their own, you'd get a disaster.

    If you ask a Black linemen to run a mile, he will run like an Usain Bolt.

    Any strategy, long term game plan, Blacks miserably fail it.

    Blacks don't create the Basketball game, Blacks don't come up with football tactics. They use their body. That's it.

    On the other hand, East Asians create their own games and master them. East Asian create their own version of games.

    Look at this music.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85Fc2amPf34

    Would be highly valued in East Asia and emotionally cathartic to ears. But the value is just a paltry $0.02 cent.

    This? Uncle Sam allowance to Black community make it millions worth, and all the gibberish.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNkMfRjFZ6M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19nm5_nAwQg

    Navajo-Ute musician R. Carlos Naka

    Chinese music will become culture-cided/ Americanized just as African rhythms

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEwnHf9Q23k

    became Hollywoodized.

    re Jews not proselytizers? Whaddya call Hollywood. Mormons go door-to-door in multiple countries. Jews are more efficient, they proselytize their view of the world digitally.

    Netanyahu told Congress it should “beam Hollywood programs into Iran, let young Iranians see the clothes and cars & swimming pools — ‘that’s subversive.’ ”
    That’s culturecide.

    Read More
  194. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website
    @dahoit
    Remember the old joke about how many poles(12?) to screw in a light bulb?
    Well they never mention there were 24 Jews giving them conflicted info on how to do it.
    Jews are the worst manual workers in this world,manual labor is undesirable,and slaves do all their dirty work.
    Of course there are a few exceptions.

    “Jews are the worst manual workers in this world,manual labor is undesirable,and slaves do all their dirty work.”

    True

    https://youtu.be/YOaYkT6fsXg?t=1m45s

    Read More
  195. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Priss Factor
    "If game and cock size was the only thing that mattered than why isn’t the whole world black?"

    Because prior to globalism, each nation kept up its borders and had its own culture.

    But now we have huge migrations of people.

    And all nations worship Rap and image of Negro stud.

    Black Africa has 60 kids per women and all those black men are moving to Europe to blacken the race. Western media even promote that stuff and attack anyone who say 'white must remain white'.
    http://www.amren.com/features/2016/07/the-colonization-of-europe/


    And look how fast Asia is changing. Younger Japanese and Korons love Diversity. 80% are 'progressive'. They just follow west. Japan had as miss japan some woman whose father is black.
    Korea gets an African to run in Olympics as 'Korean' runner. For younger gen, 'racism' and 'homogeneity' are worst words.

    Yelloids have no culture except to imitate the West.

    Look at massive homo parades in japan, Korea, Vietnam.

    Hong Kong and Taiwan are ruled by globalists calling for diversity and homo stuff.

    Culture of young people in Asia is rap and homo stuff.

    Asians follow. since whites have 'white guilt' about blacks, jews, and homos, Asians feel they must adopt 'white guilt' on those matters because they think white way = development = progress. The human is associative. Since white nations are most advanced, yelloids think white way is correct on everything.

    China may be the ONLY asian nation that can resist this because it has national sovereignty.

    "The entire Kardashian family went dark, so hope you lock up your daughter or else she will pass on the dorky white boy who can’t dance in favor of eggplant."

    Kartrash is the #1 celebrity popular among white girls.
    So you see, white race is going black.
    Since yelloids imitate whites, they too go black or go-white-going-black.

    Yelloids have tons of plastic surgery to look white. But since white thing is now to favor mulattoization and since rap is the global music, yelloids will go the same way.

    And the thing is parents have no control over the kids. No can lock them up. Global freedom means girls all go groid.

    (((insert embarrassment emoticon)))

    what do you mean by “game” ?

    Read More
  196. Rehmat says:
    @Seraphim
    @Muslim natives in China

    You mean natives of China who became Muslims.

    Do you mean any Native who convert to Islam loses his/her Native status?

    How come when Lord Goldsmith’s daughter converted to Islam and married Pakistan’s Cricket Team Captain Imran Khan, she didn’t lose her British Native status? Her brother Zak Goldsmith was recently defeated by Sadiq Khan to become Mayor of London.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/04/20/london-mayoral-election-and-uks-muslim-problem/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seraphim
    Islam is not a 'native' culture anywhere, except Arabia. In China, as everywhere else, it is an invasive culture brought by immigrants.
  197. AaronB says:
    @Anonymous
    IQ tests themselves do not determine someone's future or worth as a person, but the IQ tests themselves are accurate. They are a measure is someone's cognitive ability. That's it.

    To say that Mexicans merely don't try hard on the IQ test so add 20 IQ points or that Jews are out partying the night before so add another 40 points to Jewish IQ is rediculous.

    Meanwhile subtract 20 IQ points from the Chinese since all they do is study for IQ tests day and night.

    These arguments are standard arguments when white people are confronted with higher Chinese IQ and feel threatened.

    First they deny the validity of the IQ test, then when that doesn't work they say IQ doesn't matter. Why? Reasons lol.

    Meanwhile white people sure do like using IQ to show superiority against blacks and hispanics. I guess then IQ tests are accurate and relevant lol.

    I agree that whites are wrong in using IQ tests to feel superior to many other groups. I made that clear.

    I don’t know what you were talking about, but I was talking about the ways IQ fails to be accurate.

    If you wish to ignore the mounting incongruities, you have a perfect right to do so, and indeed you will have the establishment at your back, for a time at least. Good luck to you.

    IQ tests obviously measure motivation and priorities related to an industrial economy as well as intelligence, and to what extent these factors can be separated no one knows, because we preferred to ignore these messy details.

    Again, I completely respect your rght to ignore these facts if you wish to.

    Read More
  198. Talha says:
    @AaronB
    Good noticng, Fred.

    It has been obvious for some time that the facts about IQ are murky. For instance, IQ proponets love to tell us IQ is well correlated to life success, which is true, but then so is ambition. How much of what IQ measures is simply ambition? I'd wager a fairly large percentage. So simple a concept, potentially so important, yet so rarely given any attention!

    Jewish over performance was never just about IQ, as statistically speaking, there were always way more high IQ whites in the country. There was always an intangible factor that loomed huge and enormous but no one could quite identify.

    Its not just IQ. The problem extends to all supposedly stable geneticaly heritable traits on a national level, which simply refuse to stay stable over time despite the best efforts of our best scientists to insist they should do so.

    The Germans were the sleepy, dreamy poets and thinkers of Europe for a long time, with an actual reputation for dishonesty and shoddy workmanship (!) for a while, and poor discipline.

    What happened to stable genetic traits that are heritable? Oh my.

    In the 19th cent, the popular tropes had it as, lazy, slothful Asians, and energetic westerners.

    Where did THAT go? Lazy chinese indeed.

    But as Steve Sailer says in another context, you're not supposed to notice any of this stuff, because it threatens the attempt to erect a clear, simple, deterministic, picture of human nature scientists have been trying to establish for some time now.

    You can't measure ambition, or other intangibles, so we all preferred to sweep these disagreeable little details under the rug in order to make tidy little narrative.

    The temper of the age is scientistic, so we ignore messy details and intangibles.

    The result is clarity at the expense of accuracy, simplicity and perhaps control at the sacrifice of understanding.

    At this point in time, it's impose be to know the true differences in intelligence between groups. You tourself, Fred, have noticed that Mexicans ate far more intelligent than clueless Americans think, and I've noticed the same thing with all my third world travels.

    What if Mexicans simply don't try very hard on IQ tests? How would we know this, how would we measure this?

    I'm Jewish, and was a national merit semifinalist from new york. I showed up to the test completely unaware it was that day, after a night of partying, and completely bungled the math section while doing great on English. My life was a shambles at that time anyways and i wasn't laying any attention to math. If I were chinese, is there any doubt my parents would organize my whole life around doing great on that test?

    As a Jew, I know tons of clever and capable Jews, but the smartest people I've ever met were whites. What gives? Mere anecdote? Maybe.

    These non wrstern people are not as stupid as we think, far from it, and the reason they are not more advanced is because they simply have different priorities.

    Americans cannot understand how anyone can prefer a life that doesn't involve being an advanced industrial economy. They are sure that if some countries fail at that, it can only be because of stupidity. Yet everything is a sacrifice, and how much have we lost in the West by becoming mere consumers in an an industrial economy? Yet we cannot imagine that other people may not be so eager to make that exchange. Of course, Americans are fools, so what can we expect?

    Dear AaronB,

    Great points sir! This one I cannot agree with more:

    These non wrstern people are not as stupid as we think, far from it, and the reason they are not more advanced is because they simply have different priorities.

    This is very important; technological advancement is not neutral and its effects on a culture are not always benign. A tribal culture that values close-knit family, filial piety, normative sexual mores, respect for the wisdom and guidance of elders may not want to trade that in for an uncompromising individualism, no matter what the material benefits. There is also religion which is important to many people.

    Neil Postman wrote a beautiful work on this, which I would highly recommend to everyone:

    https://www.amazon.com/Technopoly-Surrender-Technology-Neil-Postman/dp/0679745408

    Peace.

    Read More
  199. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Which is to say that even if all the whites were Jews and no HAGVACAS (House and Garden Variety (non-Jewish) Caucasians

    really Fred?

    Fred speaks Spanish so that was not an accident

    one look at that acronym and there’s no doubt what Fred is implying

    (which is kind of funny, and apropos really ; )

    .

    .

    Rurikk is Rurik from his girlfriend’s house

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "HAGVACAS (House and Garden Variety (non-Jewish) Caucasians"

    They should be called Tattooines.

    I went on a recent trip to Missouri and saw so much tattoos on 'white trash', it was sickening.
  200. AaronB says:
    @WhatEvvs
    I usually disagree with Fred Reed 90%, but in this case, all I can say is, "great stuff." What Fred is saying is that the decline of the American Jewish community is a bellwether of the decline of the great civilization that they emigrated to three generations ago. And, unusually for an Unz article, he isn't blaming Jews, for which he deserves a special pat on the back.

    If you want to see how degraded the US is, take a look at a formerly high performing group. American Jews may not be in prisons or taking drugs, but they react in their own way. By giving up hard work, and not forming stable families.

    Great point.

    America today provides conditions that leads to the degregation of every group that comes in to join the national scramble for money and stuff.

    America is the great vulgarization machine of our times. I personally see this with Asians and would caution them to beware. Second generation Asians are fatter, stupider, louder, sloppier, angrier, unhappier.

    For how much longer Asians can buck the universal American trend towards degregation remains to be seen, but my money is on not very long.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Karl
    > Second generation Asians are fatter

    if you don't believe that.... visit Guam

    Bring your Korean phrasebook, by the way. Lottsa package-tour hotties nowadays.

    , @WhatEvvs
    Also Hispanics - Sailer did something about the "Hispanic paradox" -- i.e., they have the lowest infant mortality rates of any US pop'n group, thus disproving the "barriers to health care" excuse w/respect to high infant mortality rates among US blacks. Check back in a generation when their IM rates have risen.

    The HBD crowd is made up of cruel losers. I guess I used to be one. But funny thing, I got out of the house a little and didn't not notice things. I notice that black African women are not like African-American women. They are slender, feminine, and normal. Not that I want them to come here in their billions. I do not. Just pointing out a fact.
  201. 5371 says:
    @biz
    1) Jews everywhere are have similarities in genotype to a certain extent.*

    2) Proselytizing does not mean the same thing as occasionally accepting coverts

    * NB I am not interested in rehashing with you how Y-chromosomes imply much more about a population's relative ancestry fraction than any particular individual's. You either understand it or you don't.

    [to a certain extent]

    I would quote “Up to a point, Lord Copper” but you are probably not very familiar with English literature.

    Read More
  202. AaronB says:
    @WhatEvvs
    "But as Steve Sailer says in another context, you’re not supposed to notice any of this stuff, because it threatens the attempt to erect a clear, simple, deterministic, picture of human nature scientists have been trying to establish for some time now."

    Yeah, but the HBD guys notice what they want to notice and don't notice anything they don't. So they are no different from the crazy leftists in that regard. Their shtick is Genes Uber Alles, and it doesn't matter if you grow up in a shambles, what matters is that the tape inside your Jewish brain unfolded as Darwin decreed. I drop by Unz every six months or so to see what the crazies here say, and it the same (((old story))), never changes.

    I know, mipchunk, it’s really quite absurd, but eventually the model will crack as the incongruities become more impossible to ignore.

    Judith Harris actually wrote an absurd book on how family life has no effect on adult outcomes, which are solely controlled by genes plus some unknown factor, which she thought might be peer groups. But the evident trend was to deny that family can have serious impact as opposed to genes, against the wisdom of the ages. Of course, the book was widely hailed.

    In a sense Western culture can be seen as the application of the idea of reductive materialism in ever wider fields, till we reach the point of absurdity and we return to saner ways of thinking. We are far from that point yet, sadly.

    Read More
    • Replies: @WhatEvvs
    Ah, Judith Harris, the queen of the HBD crowd. Someone (not me) wrote a terrific take down of one of her books. I looked it up just for you:

    https://www.amazon.com/Nurture-Assumption-Children-Revised-Updated/product-reviews/1439101655/ref=cm_cr_dp_qt_hist_one?ie=UTF8&filterByStar=one_star&showViewpoints=0

    I'm referring to the one-star "D" for delusional. It's a great review.

    I'm making a prediction here. As the disaster of neoliberal policies continues to destroy the white working class, the HBD crowd will suddenly discover a strange new respect for the effects of culture on a child's growing mind. They will suddenly acknowledge that having a stable two-parent family (by which I mean mother and father, ideally biological), supportive institutions, the possibility of employment, and religion really does matter! The idea! And of course, they will take credit for inventing this particular wheel.
  203. Talha says:
    @AaronB
    Good noticng, Fred.

    It has been obvious for some time that the facts about IQ are murky. For instance, IQ proponets love to tell us IQ is well correlated to life success, which is true, but then so is ambition. How much of what IQ measures is simply ambition? I'd wager a fairly large percentage. So simple a concept, potentially so important, yet so rarely given any attention!

    Jewish over performance was never just about IQ, as statistically speaking, there were always way more high IQ whites in the country. There was always an intangible factor that loomed huge and enormous but no one could quite identify.

    Its not just IQ. The problem extends to all supposedly stable geneticaly heritable traits on a national level, which simply refuse to stay stable over time despite the best efforts of our best scientists to insist they should do so.

    The Germans were the sleepy, dreamy poets and thinkers of Europe for a long time, with an actual reputation for dishonesty and shoddy workmanship (!) for a while, and poor discipline.

    What happened to stable genetic traits that are heritable? Oh my.

    In the 19th cent, the popular tropes had it as, lazy, slothful Asians, and energetic westerners.

    Where did THAT go? Lazy chinese indeed.

    But as Steve Sailer says in another context, you're not supposed to notice any of this stuff, because it threatens the attempt to erect a clear, simple, deterministic, picture of human nature scientists have been trying to establish for some time now.

    You can't measure ambition, or other intangibles, so we all preferred to sweep these disagreeable little details under the rug in order to make tidy little narrative.

    The temper of the age is scientistic, so we ignore messy details and intangibles.

    The result is clarity at the expense of accuracy, simplicity and perhaps control at the sacrifice of understanding.

    At this point in time, it's impose be to know the true differences in intelligence between groups. You tourself, Fred, have noticed that Mexicans ate far more intelligent than clueless Americans think, and I've noticed the same thing with all my third world travels.

    What if Mexicans simply don't try very hard on IQ tests? How would we know this, how would we measure this?

    I'm Jewish, and was a national merit semifinalist from new york. I showed up to the test completely unaware it was that day, after a night of partying, and completely bungled the math section while doing great on English. My life was a shambles at that time anyways and i wasn't laying any attention to math. If I were chinese, is there any doubt my parents would organize my whole life around doing great on that test?

    As a Jew, I know tons of clever and capable Jews, but the smartest people I've ever met were whites. What gives? Mere anecdote? Maybe.

    These non wrstern people are not as stupid as we think, far from it, and the reason they are not more advanced is because they simply have different priorities.

    Americans cannot understand how anyone can prefer a life that doesn't involve being an advanced industrial economy. They are sure that if some countries fail at that, it can only be because of stupidity. Yet everything is a sacrifice, and how much have we lost in the West by becoming mere consumers in an an industrial economy? Yet we cannot imagine that other people may not be so eager to make that exchange. Of course, Americans are fools, so what can we expect?

    Also…

    Yet everything is a sacrifice, and how much have we lost in the West by becoming mere consumers in an an industrial economy?

    Self control? Thoreau would certainly say so. IQ tests will never be able to gauge the spiritual aspect (or loss thereof) of the human condition.
    “As he burned he never moved a muscle, never uttered a sound, his outward composure in sharp contrast to the wailing people around him.”
    “The self-immolation was later regarded as a turning point in the Buddhist crisis and a critical point in the collapse of the Diem regime.”

    http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/the-burning-monk-1963/

    If a culture can teach and value that kind of mastery-of-self, which may be inversely related to one’s materialism – it is not silly to imagine that they may consider its preservation worth more than all the iPhones in the world.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    Talha, you make excellent points, but you and I strictly a minority opinion in the modern world.

    Most Americans simply can't understand this kind of talk. To them, nothing has value except gadgets, stuff, money, and power. Americans are angry and miserable, but incapable of questioning their assumptions and values. They're on autopilot. They simply assume everyone is like them, or that everyone wants more than anything to be like them but cant, because they're too stupid.

    And yet Americans regularly rank as the least happy in the world. Try connecting the dots to an American, and he will just attack you.

    Europeans are only slightly better, and China seems to have chosen the American path, and are rapidly becoming stupider than Americans. The Chinese are probably already stupider than Americans.

    Which worries me, as it seems no one is capable of resisting this virus - one after another, each great culture collapses.

    Sanity probably exists only the margins these days.
  204. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Priss Factor
    "If game and cock size was the only thing that mattered than why isn’t the whole world black?"

    Because prior to globalism, each nation kept up its borders and had its own culture.

    But now we have huge migrations of people.

    And all nations worship Rap and image of Negro stud.

    Black Africa has 60 kids per women and all those black men are moving to Europe to blacken the race. Western media even promote that stuff and attack anyone who say 'white must remain white'.
    http://www.amren.com/features/2016/07/the-colonization-of-europe/


    And look how fast Asia is changing. Younger Japanese and Korons love Diversity. 80% are 'progressive'. They just follow west. Japan had as miss japan some woman whose father is black.
    Korea gets an African to run in Olympics as 'Korean' runner. For younger gen, 'racism' and 'homogeneity' are worst words.

    Yelloids have no culture except to imitate the West.

    Look at massive homo parades in japan, Korea, Vietnam.

    Hong Kong and Taiwan are ruled by globalists calling for diversity and homo stuff.

    Culture of young people in Asia is rap and homo stuff.

    Asians follow. since whites have 'white guilt' about blacks, jews, and homos, Asians feel they must adopt 'white guilt' on those matters because they think white way = development = progress. The human is associative. Since white nations are most advanced, yelloids think white way is correct on everything.

    China may be the ONLY asian nation that can resist this because it has national sovereignty.

    "The entire Kardashian family went dark, so hope you lock up your daughter or else she will pass on the dorky white boy who can’t dance in favor of eggplant."

    Kartrash is the #1 celebrity popular among white girls.
    So you see, white race is going black.
    Since yelloids imitate whites, they too go black or go-white-going-black.

    Yelloids have tons of plastic surgery to look white. But since white thing is now to favor mulattoization and since rap is the global music, yelloids will go the same way.

    And the thing is parents have no control over the kids. No can lock them up. Global freedom means girls all go groid.

    Sounds like you spend too much time on the Internet and not enough time in the real world.

    Globalization, like you have seen in the West, is a distinctly Anglo and Jewish thing. No one else does it. The goal is to import a bunch of goyim or cattle to serve as the lower class to rule over.

    Again, no one else does this except for Anglo and Jewish socities. Asia can import workers, but they will not be Africans. They will be other asians like Phillipinos and not in huge numbers.

    While black culture has had an influence in Asia, it is no where near as impact full as it is with white people where you have people like Rachel Dozeal pretending to be chocolate when she us snow white.

    Fred mentioned this in the article. White people grasping at straws on why China will implode. Pure Schadenfreude.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "Sounds like you spend too much time on the Internet and not enough time in the real world.
    Globalization, like you have seen in the West, is a distinctly Anglo and Jewish thing. No one else does it. The goal is to import a bunch of goyim or cattle to serve as the lower class to rule over."

    What?

    First, Asians lost their connection to past and identity.

    Asians are biggest internet and videogame junkies in the world.

    So, they are totally influenced by globalism.

    Asians have no connection to reality. Young ones look down on older people as 'lame' since cool is all that counts. It's all study(western style PC) and all internet & videogame.

    They are following in the footsteps of white people because Asian culture is just imitating whites.

    Asians wanna get away from Asia and live with 'diversity'. And young ones want to turn their nation more like America cuz they are told 'diversity' is cool.

    All Asian teachers and intellectuals are PC clones of the West.

    http://blog.lareviewofbooks.org/the-korea-blog/hell-joseon-korean-literature/

    And just search youtube 2016 'pride' parade for Tokyo and Seoul and Vietnam.

    Asians follow. They are servile and slavish.

    Why are 80% of Asian-Americans so PC and Democratic? They just follow the Narrative.

  205. KenH says:

    Freddy unwittingly demolishes the theory of white privilege. For if we’re discussing how the Chinese are displacing Jews in Ivy league attendance and other academic pursuits and even becoming predominant then it proves that non-white racial groups have been and can be successful even when if comes at the expense of America’s founding white racial stock and its descendents. Not that Fred is a proponent of such idiotic theories.

    Somehow I don’t think the Chinese would allow millions of non-Chinese into their nations then allow them to displace the natives in higher education. They aren’t and they never will because the Chinese are at least racially sane and impervious to doctrines of equality, universalism and other tenets of cultural Marxism and in some regards, Christianity.

    Read More
  206. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    Which is to say that even if all the whites were Jews and no HAGVACAS (House and Garden Variety (non-Jewish) Caucasians
     
    really Fred?

    Fred speaks Spanish so that was not an accident

    one look at that acronym and there's no doubt what Fred is implying

    (which is kind of funny, and apropos really ; )

    .

    .

    Rurikk is Rurik from his girlfriend's house

    “HAGVACAS (House and Garden Variety (non-Jewish) Caucasians”

    They should be called Tattooines.

    I went on a recent trip to Missouri and saw so much tattoos on ‘white trash’, it was sickening.

    Read More
  207. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    Fred tells us that Jews used to provide the brains that powered America’s world-leading technology, but now Jews aren’t performing like they used to while the Chinese in China, millions and millions of them, just about as bright as Jews, are making China a world leader in technology, including obviously, military technology.

    So, Fred asks, how will America survive in competition with China which has so many more bright people than America?

    This is a good question, for which no one here seems to have the answer, perhaps because there is no answer. Nations and empires rise and, if the past is anything to go by, invariably fall. America’s time as the exceptional nation may be near its end.

    As for what happened to America’s Jews, I would guess that two things happened.

    First, the achievement of great material success. For poor Jews like Richard Feynman, going to Princeton was a step in the right direction. But to many of the next generation, Princeton was the starting point and Wall St. the ultimate objective.

    Second, many Jews have been Americanized. They read the same New York Times and WaPo propaganda as everyone else. They watch the same crap TV and Hollywood movies. The result: dilution of the Jewish culture, which I suggest, had far more to do with past Jewish academic achievement than any special Jewish genes. After all, Jews may be clannish, but Jewish males have, in general, no reluctance to spread their genes among other nations.

    That culture outweighs genes in determining the rise and fall of nations, seems evident from the trajectory of Britain, France, Germany and other Western European countries. There, very small elites transformed the world through innovations in finance, warfare, science and technology. In Britain the elite culture was embedded in a few small institutions, including the public (i.e., private) boarding schools and two tiny, by present-day standards, universities. At Cambridge, Trinity College, with no more than a few dozen scholars, has won more Novel Prizes than the nation of France. Yet the Brits surely have no special genes for IQ. Surveys indicate, on the contrary, that the IQ of the typical Cambridge University don is by no means extraordinary.

    But as with the Jews in America, the bright scions of the Euro elite are now more interested in finance than science or public service. Thus, neither Europe nor America can be great again without a major cultural reconstruction, a development that seems improbably in the extreme.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "But as with the Jews in America, the bright scions of the Euro elite are now more interested in finance than science or public service."

    They are totally into public service. The state has grown bigger with Eurocrats.

    Also, there is tremendous innovation happening now, indeed 'too much' and mostly in the West.

    I hate Michio Cuckoo, but this guy is close to what is happening in innovation(mostly in the West), and it is scary.

    I wish innovation shuts down.

    Until recently, innovation was better tools to help humans.
    Now, it is changing the very meaning of what it means to be human.
    It's Brave New World stuff.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liOqzjEhEQQ
    , @Salger
    The lack of advancements by Sub-Saharan Africans and noticeably lower IQ of American Blacks works you're habit of pretending "culture" outweighs biology.
  208. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website
    @Anonymous
    Sounds like you spend too much time on the Internet and not enough time in the real world.

    Globalization, like you have seen in the West, is a distinctly Anglo and Jewish thing. No one else does it. The goal is to import a bunch of goyim or cattle to serve as the lower class to rule over.

    Again, no one else does this except for Anglo and Jewish socities. Asia can import workers, but they will not be Africans. They will be other asians like Phillipinos and not in huge numbers.

    While black culture has had an influence in Asia, it is no where near as impact full as it is with white people where you have people like Rachel Dozeal pretending to be chocolate when she us snow white.

    Fred mentioned this in the article. White people grasping at straws on why China will implode. Pure Schadenfreude.

    “Sounds like you spend too much time on the Internet and not enough time in the real world.
    Globalization, like you have seen in the West, is a distinctly Anglo and Jewish thing. No one else does it. The goal is to import a bunch of goyim or cattle to serve as the lower class to rule over.”

    What?

    First, Asians lost their connection to past and identity.

    Asians are biggest internet and videogame junkies in the world.

    So, they are totally influenced by globalism.

    Asians have no connection to reality. Young ones look down on older people as ‘lame’ since cool is all that counts. It’s all study(western style PC) and all internet & videogame.

    They are following in the footsteps of white people because Asian culture is just imitating whites.

    Asians wanna get away from Asia and live with ‘diversity’. And young ones want to turn their nation more like America cuz they are told ‘diversity’ is cool.

    All Asian teachers and intellectuals are PC clones of the West.

    http://blog.lareviewofbooks.org/the-korea-blog/hell-joseon-korean-literature/

    And just search youtube 2016 ‘pride’ parade for Tokyo and Seoul and Vietnam.

    Asians follow. They are servile and slavish.

    Why are 80% of Asian-Americans so PC and Democratic? They just follow the Narrative.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Like I said, you spend too much time on the internet. Just because you read something on the net you think that is how it is in real life. Or more likely, you just look for stories that confirm your own bias.

    The Schadenfreude is strong in you. You seem to be aware that whites are in decline, so your response is that at least Asians are going down with us and hopefully they will have it worse than we do.

    You are exactly the kind of white person Fred was talking about in the article.