The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
YouTube Will Censor Non-Rulebreaking Content, Manipulate Search Results, and Work with ADL
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Content creators on YouTube who follow all of the site’s rules may still face censorship by the platform, under new plans announced by Google.

According to a post on YouTube’s official blog, videos will now be subject to the rule of the mob. If enough users flag a video as “hate speech” or “violent extremism,” YouTube may impose restrictions on the content even if it breaks none of the platform’s rules.

We’ll soon be applying tougher treatment to videos that aren’t illegal but have been flagged by users as potential violations of our policies on hate speech and violent extremism. If we find that these videos don’t violate our policies but contain controversial religious or supremacist content, they will be placed in a limited state. The videos will remain on YouTube behind an interstitial, won’t be recommended, won’t be monetized, and won’t have key features including comments, suggested videos, and likes.

YouTube has also rolled out a “trusted flagger” program, in which 15 “expert NGOs and institutions” to help them identify hate speech and extremism on their platform.

Among these organizations are the No Hate Speech Movement, a left-wing project pushed by the Council of Europe, as well as the Anti-Defamation League, an organization whose president has been accused of “manufacturing outrage” by the World Jewish Congress.

YouTube is also planning to artificially alter its search results so that searches for “sensitive” topics on YouTube no longer return the most popular videos, but a “playlist of curated YouTube videos that directly confront and debunk violent extremist messages.”

The platform also plans to artificially promote videos created via its “Creators for Change” program, which, in YouTube’s words, features creators who are “using their voices and creativity to speak out against hate speech, xenophobia and extremism.”

We’ve started rolling out features from Jigsaw’s Redirect Method to YouTube. When people search for sensitive keywords on YouTube, they will be redirected towards a playlist of curated YouTube videos that directly confront and debunk violent extremist messages. We also continue to amplify YouTube voices speaking out against hate and radicalization through our YouTube Creators for Change program. Just last week, the U.K. chapter of Creators for Change, Internet Citizens, hosted a two-day workshop for 13-18 year-olds to help them find a positive sense of belonging online and learn skills on how to participate safely and responsibly on the internet.

• Category: Ideology • Tags: Censorship, Deep State, Political Correctness 
Hide 29 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I saw the original article on Breitbart, but just checked the youtube blog after seeing the post here, and…. the youtube posting is slightly, if only slightly, less bad than I feared. The overt focus of the youtube post is to “fight terror content online”. Probably most readers aren’t flirting with the idea of joining ISIS, or of doing an Islamist “lone wolf” terror attack, but some people are. And youtube is one venue by which people get encouraged to act on such inclinations. I am pretty certain that Larry Page and Sergei Brin are not in any way secret Islamists. (Brin’s father, as I recall, was an actual refugee from the USSR.) I suspect that they are probably the LEAST SJWish of all the MAJOR tech moguls (although that is a low bar…) The blog posting is bad, very bad. But what is bad is that while addressing a real issue, whoever wrote the post is trying to strike at political enemies who come from a rather different angle. Jordan Peterson is not ISIS. He is more like the anti-ISIS. That is mostly good.

    • Replies: @Colleen Pater
  2. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Youtube’s CEO, Susan Wojcicki, has a sister, Anne Wojcicki, who was married to Google’s co-founder, Sergey Brin, until 2015. Of note, Brin’s former wife is the co-founder and current CEO of 23andMe.

    So the son of Sergey Brin and Anne Wojcicki has a father who is the co-founder and current CEO of Google’s parent company, a mother who is the co-founder and current CEO of 23andMe, and an aunt who is the CEO of YouTube. Does anyone else think that this is a rather unusual concentration of power in one family?

  3. Don’t like what YouTube is doing? Use Vimeo. Don’t like what Vimeo is doing? Use something else.

    Or create your own. I thought this place was full of super high IQ people.

    • Replies: @VICB3
  4. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Wow…. I knew about the Wojcicki connection, but somehow it eluded me that there were two of them! I guess I always blurred them together,….

  5. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    It’s part of governance and governing people.

    Ever read Gustave le Bon’s book on crowds?

    They’d fall sick, weren’t they governed. And it’s who’s best at handling them that gets to handle them.

    The powerful have become powerful because what they like best in life is to govern others.
    As for the crowd, what they need most in life is to be directed.
    A marriage made in heaven, as they say.
    Try to separate the crowd from the masters, and it’ll be the crowd, not the masters, to lynch you.
    They are the needy player in the game.

    You can argue there’s no perfection to nature, but a lot of efficiency is there definitely.

  6. polistra says:

    I’m not worried.

    Youtube has been pulling the Nurse Ratched routine for quite a while. ” Now now, we shouldn’t be watching this unpleasant stuff. Here’s what we should be watching instead.”

    Nannying always backfires. Official condescension is a QUICK way to radicalize a youngster who already feels alienated.

    Beautiful karma.

  7. I guess people won’t be able to watch things like this much longer –

    • Replies: @Stewart Schwartz
  8. @Anonymous

    Youre either a fool or I suspect a crafty jew, (((google))) is doing exactly what the play book has said for decades, use islamic extremism to justify extreme sanctions on whites. you will see the jihad videos will somehow continue to slip through as they do on twitter and facebook while all the non prog videos will be censored. These companies need to be turned into utilities and forced to except net metering of content

    • Replies: @Chuck
    , @Anonymous
  9. Chuck says:
    @Colleen Pater

    The foundation is the money printing monopoly. You can have a 100% free market except for the money printing monopoly and whoever controls that monopoly will control the “free” market.

  10. Brabantian says: • Website

    Google is on its way to come-uppance across the Western world, with the Eastern world led by China, already being well-aware & having begun to take strong action against what criminals they are

    The European Commission not only just issued a € 2.7 billion fine against Google, with further EU actions to be taken as Google’s horrific frauds & criminal attacks against EU citizens & companies become much further explored –

    But the EU now also has an ally in the Trump White House, where Steve Bannon has launched an initiative to terminate Google’s ugly role as a politically-biased & criminal private monopoly, and make Google search & Facebook into public utilities under open direct public regulation … so that we won’t have this game of Google pretending to be ‘just a private company’ … it is high time the Google gangsters were put down

    • Replies: @U. Ranus
  11. Supposedly there are comments. I don’t see them. I’m using Win 10 and Firefox.

    • Replies: @jim jones
  12. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Colleen Pater

    Actually, I am neither a fool nor a Jew of any sort. I am a thoughtful and intelligent man who recognizes that the world is actually complex. Get a grip. If you can read, and think, you’ll see that my comment shows a full awareness of the danger of Islamic extremism being used as a tool to censor content of rather different sorts.

    • Replies: @Mishima Zaibatsu
  13. Osten says:

    Censor by control. Gatekeeper role. Noose tightens.

  14. Dave Pinsen says: • Website

    Remember, Google (Alphabet!) owns YouTube, and Google’s cofounders worked out of Susan Wojcicki’s garage early on.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  15. Dave Pinsen says: • Website

    This sounds like a great opportunity for Ron Unz to start a YouTube competitor. He might have to curate it a bit to keep hosting costs down, but that might help make it profitable.

  16. eah says:

    It’s only a matter of time before an alternative to (((Youtube))) emerges — the barriers to entry are not high.

    • Replies: @GourmetDan
  17. @Anonymous

    Colleen Pater is 100% correct in his/her assertions, because all real-world evidence shows that the only thing the global elite view as a threat is nationalism and resistance to globalism.

    Remember when it was revealed that American intelligence agencies view people with anti-UN bumper stickers as the foremost threat to the nation?

    Let’s just be honest about it and say out loud that the only reason why intelligence services even have “deradicalisation programs” etc for Muslims is because they know the natives will get restless if there are too many terror attacks.

    Here in the UK we have had two “hate crime” murders of Muslims in the past couple of years. Both were by Salafists who believed the men they murdered were “infidels”.

    One of the cases was the murder of Ahmadi Muslim Asad Shah, a shopkeeper in Glasgow who was brutally stabbed and stamped to death outside his shop just hours after wishing his Christian customers a “Happy Easter”.

    The UK’s largest Muslim umbrella group, the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) released a statement condemning attacks on Ahmadi Muslims, but also announcing that, in its view, Ahmadis are kuffar (non-believers) who the Quran says are destined for “doom and degradation” after death.

    Appearing in court, where he was sentences to 27 years for the murder, Tanveer Ahmed was joined by an army of fans, who shouted Islamic slogans and argued the killer had done nothing wrong.

    Are any of the “anti-hate” campaigns doing anything about this stuff? Is anyone speaking out about it, are the authorities taking this stuff seriously? Of course not, as what happens among Muslims is of no importance to the powers that be.

    Yet any white opposition to mass migration is a sure sign that Another Shoah™ is on the way, which is why the establishment insists that people who complain about our replacement and displacement are the universe’s number one terror threat.

    Take the media’s response to backlash over Scotland’s National Portrait Gallery releasing a music video calling white people “inbred spawn soon to die out.”

    The video features a rapper from the group “Young Fathers” staring at portraits of former Scottish Kings like James III and distinguished architects like Sir William Bruce and calling them “dead, random white dudes” and proclaiming “they are a gravestone that a dog pisses against.”

    How did the MSM report people’s negative reaction to this? They reacted thus:

    A CAMPAIGN by the ‘Far Right’ forced artwork by one of Scotland’s biggest bands to be withdrawn from the National Galleries of Scotland following claims by extremists that it was “anti-white”.

    But the film, which has been praised by fans including writer Irvine Welsh, attracted a string of extremist and racist comments on social media amid claims it was “targeted” by the far right.

    The reaction prompted Young Fathers to urge the galleries to remove the artwork from their website claiming it had been “hijacked by people with ulterior motives, to create hatred and division amongst us”.

    Don’t worry, though, because:

    But within hours of the footage being withdrawn, the National Galleries of Scotland reposted the video.

  18. Wally says: • Website

    Free speech about this is what they really want silenced:

    The ‘6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    Science, rational thought, & logic simply demolish the ‘holocaust’ storyline.
    And that’s why there are Thought Crime Laws that imprison those who engage in free speech about it.
    Truth is hate to those that hate the truth.

  19. VICB3 says:

    Thinking the same thing. Attn. Vimeo: Opportunity knocks!

    (That, and now YouTube has *finally* come out of the closet and is just days away from changing it’s name to ‘JewTube.’ But you shouldn’t say that, not PC, because, well, you know….)

    Just a thought.


    • Replies: @Hrw-500
  20. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Dave Pinsen

    I didn’t realize that Google (Alphabet!) owned YouTube, but I did know about the founders working out of Susan’s garage. It’s all so incestuous. I mean, good for them, but it seems like way too much power concentrated in one family. And way too much access to personal information about fellow Americans and others.

  21. Hrw-500 says:

    There’s also Dailymotion,, Liveleak, Metacafe, etc… and Bittube who’s more to the right of the alt-right and hosting some of the videos posted by Evalion. Could we said “alt-alt-right.”? 😉

    • Replies: @Hrw-500
  22. @eah

    It’s only a matter of time before an alternative to (((Youtube))) emerges — the barriers to entry are not high.

    Unrestricted and open communication goes against everything the globalists are working to achieve… it won’t be allowed much longer…

  23. NZLex says:
    @Stewart Schwartz

    It is a loss – you can’t just “delete” history and expect to make the world a better place. Without understanding of what really happened in the era of the World Wars, the same thing will happen again and again. Trying to pretend that Germans of the time were just “evil” people who “hated Jews” obscures the fact that, like with most racism, economic reasons were at the heart of the whole conflict. The greatest plague of our so-called “information age” is those who want only information that confirms the orthodoxy of the current moment to be seen, which is anti-history, anti-thought and, ultimately, anti-human. Without history, we lack context, which is exactly what modern propagandists would like.

  24. U. Ranus says:

    > what criminals they are

    Spot on. It’s why I don’t have much pity for the political correctness “martyrs” within their ranks. People who become “Googlers” live on the same moral plane as those who join the Mafia to become “made men”.

  25. U. Ranus says:

    > Does anyone else think that this is a rather unusual concentration of power in one family?

    Sure helps to limit the number of civilians who could quantify the level of Three Letter Agency involvement in these “private” corporations.

    Was calling the Google parent company “Alphabet” a cute inside joke?

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?