The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Eric Margolis ArchiveBlogview
Trump's Mouth Is His Worst Enemy
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

It’s been the week from hell for Donald Trump. Everything seems to be going wrong for him. The worst was the foolish and painful fight he picked with the grieving Khan family.

What happened was clearly a very clever ambush devised by the Clinton camp. A Muslim-American attorney, Khizr Khan, whose army officer son had been blown up in Iraq, was put on show at the Democratic Convention to attack Donald Trump’s ignorant and stupid anti-Muslim policies – and to embarrass him.

It worked brilliantly. Trump, like an enraged mastodon, fell right into the trap. After being sternly rebuked by Mr. Khan, Trump foolishly attacked Mrs. Khan, inferring that she was an oppressed Muslim woman and thus unworthy of our attention. The Khan’s dignified response to Trump’s boorish behavior shamed him and upset many voters.

Instead of attacking Mrs. Khan, Trump should have reminded them that Senator Hillary Clinton voted for the Iraq invasion, now seen by many as a major crime. The Khan’s son would likely be alive today – along with 4,491 US soldiers and a million or so Iraqis – if the Bush administration, with almost total Democratic support, had not fabricated and waged this ugly war.

Let’s not forget the targeted US bombing campaign – supported by Sen. Clinton – that destroyed Iraq’s water purification system and sewage treatment plants. This was, according to some UN and European critics, a major war crime that caused the death of some 550,000 Iraqi children (figures from the UN) from water-born diseases.

Recall former US neoconservative secretary of state Madeleine Albright’s notorious claim that these deaths were a ‘necessary price to pay’ for ‘liberating’ Iraq. At the same time, the US was barring the import by Iraq of school pencils under the preposterous claim that their lead would be used in Iraq’s non-existent nuclear weapons program. The vile Albright had the nerve to accuse Trump this week of being unfit for office.

Donald Trump clearly does not understand the Mideast. He is trying to assess its complexities like an accountant. In fact, he is totally lost.

I spoke with Trump last February and suggested very strongly that he needed urgent help in finding his way through the Mideast’s pitfalls and minefields. He has, it seems, relied on his own imperfect knowledge and instincts, and too often heeded Washington neocons and their media yes-men at the Wall Street Journal and Fox TV

Trump simply does not understand that there are all sorts of Muslims. There is no common Muslim identity or common interest, any more than there is a Christian, Hindu or Buddhist one. What has a Muslim in Indonesia have in common with a Moroccan Muslim? Nothing, save a vague attachment to the Muslim faith. In the Mideast, Muslim Sunni are almost at war with Shia Muslims. In South Asia, there is fierce enmity between different schools of Islam. Wahabis from Arabia are at scimitars drawn with easier-going Sufis from Asia.

In short, one cannot generalize about Muslims. The reason that America’s three million Muslims have no political clout is because they are so fragmented in faith, history, and culture. Disunity, tribalism, and localism are the curses of the Muslim world.

ORDER IT NOW

This is Understanding the Outside World 101. Alas, Trump and most Americans do not. Their views on Islam are shaped by highly biased Hollywood films and shows, the neocon media, far right religious zealots, and shadowy neocon groups who spend millions annually promoting hatred and fear of Islam.

Even most American journalists have no idea that a group with ties to Israeli intelligence translates and disseminates most communications from militant Islamic groups like ISIS, Hezbollah and Taliban.

One can’t deal with horribly complex issues like this with bumper-sticker solutions, as Trump advocates. By contrast, he’s doing the right thing by trying to break up the corrupt, war-loving, self-serving Republican Party. More power to him. But for god’s sake, please consult some real, unbiased Mideast experts whose first loyalty is to the United States.

And stop trying to wage a multi-front war against Muslims, Mexicans, angry women, the entire Israel lobby, Protestant fundamentalists and now a lot of vets. One battle at a time.

Finally, Trump’s accusation that the Obama administration bribed Iran to release four American citizens it held in prison is patent nonsense. The money had been illegally seized (‘frozen’) from Iran and was being paid back as part of the nuclear freeze deal with Washington.

Such a big lie, as Trump would say.

(Republished from EricMargolis.com by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: 2016 Election, Donald Trump 
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Kyle a says:

    “All sorts of Muslims” one Muslim is plenty. For the last time Eric, we got the last of the decent Persians over thirty years ago. Go rest your neck.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    One Zionist US-Israel citizen is enough .....

    https://youtu.be/qEdJDJgyYxs
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /emargolis/trumps-mouth-is-his-worst-enemy/#comment-1520085
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    When a train is derailed, you get it back on track. You get it going again, and you have to maintain the momentum.

    Granted, the media are laying lots of obstacles on the tracks.

    This is where alternative media have to do the job to clear the BS debris.

    Problem is Trump keeps getting sidetracked by trivia that are meant to bait him.

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Rebel
    I don't disagree, especially about (((the mainstream media)))....but Trump has no one to blame but himself. He's turned out to be a moron who doesn't know when to keep his big mouth shut, and how to choose battles wisely. When he loses, and he will lose, it will be no one else's fault but his own.
  3. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    Keep in mind that the Media are like Hillary’s bodyguards or info-secret-service. They are also her hitmen.

    Libs bitch about Dallas as City of Hate, but US is now a Nation of Hate where Trump will be character-assassinated from 1000 grassy knolls of the media.

    Media are doing to him what the cop-killer assassin did in Dallas.

    Media is the Globo-Sniper.

    Read More
  4. Rehmat says:

    Nyeth Margolis, there several beliefs common amongst the 72 Muslim sects around the world which cannot be found in Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism or Hinduism or Sikhism, such as; 1) there only one Creator (Allah), 2) Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) ends the Divine Messengership began with the first human on Earth, Adam, 3) Holy Qur’an is the final and non-corrupted revelation of the Creator.

    Nationalism, like the so-called ‘antisemitism’ is a European product introduced to the Muslim world by the European colonialists.

    Shai’ite -Sunni divide is based on political and not on Islamic religious teachings. It started over 100 years after the death of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), but was exploited by the western colonialists and imperial powers. Currently, the main actors behind the Shi’ite-Sunni divide are Saudi Arabia, Turkey, UAE, and Israel.

    The concept of nationalism originated in Europe in the 17th century after the Protestant movement challenged the authority of Catholic Church (Vatican). The western nations came into existence on the basis of common language, culture and shared history. After the break of Papal authority – there was no religious ground to unite the Christian world. Since Islamic Shri’ah bonds both the faith and politics – Islam have survived the western separation of religion from the State’s authority – fuelling the anti-religious plague of secularism – the power of a few over the rest of the humanity.

    No matter, how much the westerners love to live in ‘self-denial’ – they cannot erase their long past and present history of religious, national and colored bigotry. Twenty centuries of common religion (Christianity) has failed to unite them, except, during the Crusades or Ottoman’s conquests of Europe. The current proud pall-bearers of Judeo-Christianity always put their heads between their legs when they’re reminded that Jews were always persecuted within Christian European nations – while during the same period of time – the Jews were living in their ‘Golden Age’ in Muslim Spain.

    This western nationalist plague has never died – and always returns with more aggressive fascism. For example the systematic extermination of over 100 million American Natives and 80-100 million of Africans for European slave trade – and the two great World Wars (WW I & II) of the 20th century were fought on nationalism – though over 100 million of its aggressors and victims happened to be Christian, followed by Gypsies, Jews – and expulsion of eleven million Germans from Eastern Europe. Muslims, too, have share of ‘national’ victimization – Bosnian (persecuted as ‘Turk’, which they’re not); Chechen (persecuted as ‘Asian’); Native Palestinian (persecuted by European Jew invaders as ‘Arabs’); Kurds (persecuted as ‘non-Turk’), and Kosovar (persecuted as ‘Albanian’).

    During the 20th century – western imperialism made more people refugees 9over 60 million) on national, religious and ethnic reasons than any other century before. The great majority of these refugees happen to be Muslims – from Palestine, Kashmir, Chechnya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Bosnia, Kosovar, Philippines, and Thailand.

    Contrary to western nationalism and racism – Islamic ‘Brotherhood (Ummah)’ provides the solution to barbaric history of nationalism, race and religion. Muslims, Christian and Jews have lived in peace and friendship since the creation of first Islamic City State of Meddinah in 622 CE. Until the Ottoman Khilaphat was dissolved by Crypto-Jew, General Kemal Pasha, in 1920s – the majority of its Grand Wazirs (Prime Ministers) were not Turkish, but Albanian, Greek Christians, Croats, Cherkessians and Jews. In Muslim history, it doesn’t matter whether Ghazi Salah-Uddin al-Ayubi – the liberator of Al-Quds (1186 CE), was a Kurd, Syrian or Tatar – what it matters is that he was a devout Muslim.

    https://rehmat1.com/2008/10/31/western-nationalism-vs-islamic-brotherhood/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Fidelios Automata
    A well-written comment, Rehmat, but I respectfully decline your Islam. I'll keep my Western nationalism, thank you very much.
    , @anon
    You have a very SELECTIVE interpretation of history. You cherry-pick "facts" to suit your Muslim / immigrant agenda.

    In short YOU ARE A BULLSHIT ARTIST.
  5. Instead of attacking Mrs. Khan, Trump should have reminded them that Senator Hillary Clinton voted for the Iraq invasion, now seen by many as a major crime. The Khan’s son would likely be alive today – along with 4,491 US soldiers and a million or so Iraqis – if the Bush administration, with almost total Democratic support, had not fabricated and waged this ugly war.

    This was such an obvious ploy. “I am sorry that Mr, Khan’s son was killed in a war that Hillary voted for. I mourn all the children killed in the unnecessary wars launched by Hillary at the State Department.” It was a layup, and he tried a jam. Dumb.

    Read More
  6. J1234 says:

    This was just the standard setup for Trump: Give some little guy who’s suffered a tragedy (like losing a son) a free spot at the convention to attack the big guy. Then get a reporter to ask the big guy about the little guy’s remark. And if the big guy is Trump, it doesn’t matter how empathetic he is to the little guy (and he was), if he defends himself against the little guy in any way, the headline is going to read: BIG GUY ATTACKS LITTLE GUY AND HIS DEAD SON!

    Actually, Republicans do the same thing, too, but the press just isn’t nearly as complicit in the process. Every time poll numbers change, the press points at some causality, and this week it was this. How many times has Trump made much more outrageous statements, and his numbers went up?

    Read More
    • Replies: @exiled off mainstreet
    Actually, unfortunately once the attention had gone elsewhere, it was revealed that the "little guy" was not such an innocent, since he was a long associate of the Clintons, even doing their taxes, and since he was an advocate of the superiority of sharia law to western models, revealing his waving of the constitution to be a phony ploy, particularly since he was making his large income off of the immigration laws he was shilling for in his speech in his argument they are constitutionally mandated. I agree that Trump should have stuck with Hillary's role in starting the Iraq war rather than critiquing the stereotype Muslim wife put forward to bait Trump, but it the whole exercise was indeed a cynical ploy by the Clinton cabal, and as this guy's background more fully leaks out, the damage will be certainly reduced. At least Trump was not foolish enough to say the dead son was a hero, not a quisling working for a hostile occupation.
  7. JamesW says:

    There is no common Muslim identity or common interest, any more than there is a Christian, Hindu or Buddhist one. What has a Muslim in Indonesia have in common with a Moroccan Muslim? Nothing, save a vague attachment to the Muslim faith.

    My culture as a Western European Christian is different from that of a Russian Eastern Orthodox Christian. What we share, however, is more profound than the surface differences. The same holds true for Muslims or any other faith, to the extent the person’s faith is intelligent and deep, and that in consequence it is something far greater than a “vague attachment.” Not all believers as as shallow–or impertinent–as Mr. Margolis. I imagine that the thousands of Muslims from all over the globe who gather at their place of pilgrimage in Mecca have a more than “vague attachment” to their faith and share precisely the profound and essential unity of their faith.

    Read More
  8. Margolis says you can’t generalize about Muslims. Yes you can. I’m with Trump.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    ADL says you can't generalize about Jews. Yes you can. I'm with Rabbi Wolf Gunther Plaut, who claims that bastard Frankist Jews committed Holocaust.

    https://rehmat1.com/2012/03/24/rabbi-frankist-jews-committed-holocaust/
  9. Rehmat says:
    @Bragadocious
    Margolis says you can't generalize about Muslims. Yes you can. I'm with Trump.

    ADL says you can’t generalize about Jews. Yes you can. I’m with Rabbi Wolf Gunther Plaut, who claims that bastard Frankist Jews committed Holocaust.

    https://rehmat1.com/2012/03/24/rabbi-frankist-jews-committed-holocaust/

    Read More
  10. I hate to say it, as I’ve not a fan of “America’s Toughest Sheriff,” but Trump should consult with Arizona’s bombastic sheriff Joe Arpaio. The man is an expert at spinning bad PR into good.

    Read More
  11. @Rehmat
    Nyeth Margolis, there several beliefs common amongst the 72 Muslim sects around the world which cannot be found in Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism or Hinduism or Sikhism, such as; 1) there only one Creator (Allah), 2) Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) ends the Divine Messengership began with the first human on Earth, Adam, 3) Holy Qur'an is the final and non-corrupted revelation of the Creator.

    Nationalism, like the so-called 'antisemitism' is a European product introduced to the Muslim world by the European colonialists.

    Shai'ite -Sunni divide is based on political and not on Islamic religious teachings. It started over 100 years after the death of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), but was exploited by the western colonialists and imperial powers. Currently, the main actors behind the Shi'ite-Sunni divide are Saudi Arabia, Turkey, UAE, and Israel.

    The concept of nationalism originated in Europe in the 17th century after the Protestant movement challenged the authority of Catholic Church (Vatican). The western nations came into existence on the basis of common language, culture and shared history. After the break of Papal authority – there was no religious ground to unite the Christian world. Since Islamic Shri’ah bonds both the faith and politics – Islam have survived the western separation of religion from the State’s authority – fuelling the anti-religious plague of secularism – the power of a few over the rest of the humanity.

    No matter, how much the westerners love to live in ‘self-denial’ – they cannot erase their long past and present history of religious, national and colored bigotry. Twenty centuries of common religion (Christianity) has failed to unite them, except, during the Crusades or Ottoman’s conquests of Europe. The current proud pall-bearers of Judeo-Christianity always put their heads between their legs when they’re reminded that Jews were always persecuted within Christian European nations – while during the same period of time – the Jews were living in their ‘Golden Age’ in Muslim Spain.

    This western nationalist plague has never died – and always returns with more aggressive fascism. For example the systematic extermination of over 100 million American Natives and 80-100 million of Africans for European slave trade – and the two great World Wars (WW I & II) of the 20th century were fought on nationalism – though over 100 million of its aggressors and victims happened to be Christian, followed by Gypsies, Jews – and expulsion of eleven million Germans from Eastern Europe. Muslims, too, have share of ‘national’ victimization – Bosnian (persecuted as ‘Turk’, which they’re not); Chechen (persecuted as ‘Asian’); Native Palestinian (persecuted by European Jew invaders as ‘Arabs’); Kurds (persecuted as ‘non-Turk’), and Kosovar (persecuted as ‘Albanian’).

    During the 20th century – western imperialism made more people refugees 9over 60 million) on national, religious and ethnic reasons than any other century before. The great majority of these refugees happen to be Muslims – from Palestine, Kashmir, Chechnya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Bosnia, Kosovar, Philippines, and Thailand.

    Contrary to western nationalism and racism – Islamic ‘Brotherhood (Ummah)’ provides the solution to barbaric history of nationalism, race and religion. Muslims, Christian and Jews have lived in peace and friendship since the creation of first Islamic City State of Meddinah in 622 CE. Until the Ottoman Khilaphat was dissolved by Crypto-Jew, General Kemal Pasha, in 1920s – the majority of its Grand Wazirs (Prime Ministers) were not Turkish, but Albanian, Greek Christians, Croats, Cherkessians and Jews. In Muslim history, it doesn’t matter whether Ghazi Salah-Uddin al-Ayubi – the liberator of Al-Quds (1186 CE), was a Kurd, Syrian or Tatar – what it matters is that he was a devout Muslim.

    https://rehmat1.com/2008/10/31/western-nationalism-vs-islamic-brotherhood/

    A well-written comment, Rehmat, but I respectfully decline your Islam. I’ll keep my Western nationalism, thank you very much.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    That's fine with Islam.

    Islam emphasizes on QUALITY and not QUANTITY. It doesn't like SHEEP like in Christianity or Judaism.

    “Islam never had to go through a prolonged period of critically examining the validity of its spiritual vision, as the West did during the 18th century. Islamic culture has, of course, known its own crisis… yet it was never forced to question its traditional worldview,” – writes the historian Louis Dupre.

    “On the one hand, Islam is viewed positively, even enthusiastically, as a purified form of revealed religion, stripped of the many imperfections of Judaism and Christianity, and hence reassuringly akin to deism. On the other, Islam is more often regarded with hostility and contempt as a primitive, grossly superstitious religion like Judaism and Christianity, and one no less, or still more, adapted to promoting despotism,” – Jonathan Israel in 'Radical Enlightenment'.

    https://rehmat1.com/2009/08/06/islam-doesnt-need-enlightenment/
  12. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Trump is looking more and more like a prole who is unfit to be president.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Alarmist

    "Trump is looking more and more like a prole who is unfit to be president."
     
    Less fit than a war criminal who has gone out of her way time and again to circumvent the laws of the US?

    Wow, I'll take my chances with the prole, thankyou.

    BTW, the explicit Constitutional requirements for being President are 35 years of age, natural born US citizen, and 14 years of residence in the US. Trump meets all three, so he is Constitutionally "fit" to be President. I guess the war criminal qualifies too, but you take your candidates as you find them.
    , @woodNfish
    Only to people like you who let the LLSM lead them by the nose.
  13. polistra says:

    No need to understand the details of Muslim theology.

    Just three words.

    Don’t start wars.

    The problem with our Iraq war has nothing to do with Shias and Sunnis. It’s simple. We started a war against a country that didn’t attack us. We still haven’t responded to the country that DID attack us (Saudi). In fact we’re continuing to work with that country to make more wars against countries that DIDN’T attack us.

    This is way beyond crazy.

    Earlier Trump seemed to be making this basic point. Then he lost track of it, and I don’t think he can recover.

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenT
    You've got to to be kidding. It is the hegemonic US that "starts wars." And if you believe the current propaganda offering that the Saudis are responsible for 911, you are hopeless. The trouble with too many Americans is their intellectual laziness. The amount of expert information on 911 is enormous.
  14. @Anonymous
    Trump is looking more and more like a prole who is unfit to be president.

    “Trump is looking more and more like a prole who is unfit to be president.”

    Less fit than a war criminal who has gone out of her way time and again to circumvent the laws of the US?

    Wow, I’ll take my chances with the prole, thankyou.

    BTW, the explicit Constitutional requirements for being President are 35 years of age, natural born US citizen, and 14 years of residence in the US. Trump meets all three, so he is Constitutionally “fit” to be President. I guess the war criminal qualifies too, but you take your candidates as you find them.

    Read More
    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    I never said Hillary would be a good president. She would be the end of America actually. But I also am not going to give Trump a free pass. He has no business being in charge of nuclear weapons and I have zero faith in him keeping America safe. Trolling people when you are just some guy is one thing, but when you are president it is reckless and he just comes across as poor white trash.

    People here at Unz worship this guy, but he is just slightly better than a random guy you find on the street.
  15. Disunity, tribalism, and localism are the curses of the Muslim world.

    And they are bringing these curses with them into our world. To me, Mr. Margolisis’s characterization of the Muslim world sounds like another good reason for ending Muslim immigration until we can figure out how to exclude those who are carriers of these curses.

    Trump is the only candidate articulating this obvious problem and the just as obvious solution. But I do agree with Mr. Margolis that Trump must learn to make his case better. And Trump needs to do this soon.

    Read More
  16. Rehmat says:
    @Fidelios Automata
    A well-written comment, Rehmat, but I respectfully decline your Islam. I'll keep my Western nationalism, thank you very much.

    That’s fine with Islam.

    Islam emphasizes on QUALITY and not QUANTITY. It doesn’t like SHEEP like in Christianity or Judaism.

    “Islam never had to go through a prolonged period of critically examining the validity of its spiritual vision, as the West did during the 18th century. Islamic culture has, of course, known its own crisis… yet it was never forced to question its traditional worldview,” – writes the historian Louis Dupre.

    “On the one hand, Islam is viewed positively, even enthusiastically, as a purified form of revealed religion, stripped of the many imperfections of Judaism and Christianity, and hence reassuringly akin to deism. On the other, Islam is more often regarded with hostility and contempt as a primitive, grossly superstitious religion like Judaism and Christianity, and one no less, or still more, adapted to promoting despotism,” – Jonathan Israel in ‘Radical Enlightenment’.

    https://rehmat1.com/2009/08/06/islam-doesnt-need-enlightenment/

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    "..never force to question its traditional world-view.."

    People who question Islam tend to lose their heads.
  17. KenT says:
    @polistra
    No need to understand the details of Muslim theology.

    Just three words.

    Don't start wars.

    The problem with our Iraq war has nothing to do with Shias and Sunnis. It's simple. We started a war against a country that didn't attack us. We still haven't responded to the country that DID attack us (Saudi). In fact we're continuing to work with that country to make more wars against countries that DIDN'T attack us.

    This is way beyond crazy.

    Earlier Trump seemed to be making this basic point. Then he lost track of it, and I don't think he can recover.

    You’ve got to to be kidding. It is the hegemonic US that “starts wars.” And if you believe the current propaganda offering that the Saudis are responsible for 911, you are hopeless. The trouble with too many Americans is their intellectual laziness. The amount of expert information on 911 is enormous.

    Read More
  18. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @The Alarmist

    "Trump is looking more and more like a prole who is unfit to be president."
     
    Less fit than a war criminal who has gone out of her way time and again to circumvent the laws of the US?

    Wow, I'll take my chances with the prole, thankyou.

    BTW, the explicit Constitutional requirements for being President are 35 years of age, natural born US citizen, and 14 years of residence in the US. Trump meets all three, so he is Constitutionally "fit" to be President. I guess the war criminal qualifies too, but you take your candidates as you find them.

    I never said Hillary would be a good president. She would be the end of America actually. But I also am not going to give Trump a free pass. He has no business being in charge of nuclear weapons and I have zero faith in him keeping America safe. Trolling people when you are just some guy is one thing, but when you are president it is reckless and he just comes across as poor white trash.

    People here at Unz worship this guy, but he is just slightly better than a random guy you find on the street.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ChrisD
    You're a Dem shill, that much is clear. The tiresome: "finger on the button" nonsense is not helping your cases against Trump. Obama had no experience in 2008 except being a community organizer and junior senator with very little experience. Trump will settle in fine once he's POTUS, you just need to ignore the MSM and their pro-Killary shilling which has now reached fever pitch.

    BTW: Trump did exactly the right thing taking the Khans to task. They, along with Hillary, exploited the legacy of their dead son in order to attack Trump. Such behavior is disgusting and unforgivable.

    Polls have now narrowed as of today and Hillary's post convention bump was smaller than Trump's.
  19. ChrisD says:
    @Anonymous
    I never said Hillary would be a good president. She would be the end of America actually. But I also am not going to give Trump a free pass. He has no business being in charge of nuclear weapons and I have zero faith in him keeping America safe. Trolling people when you are just some guy is one thing, but when you are president it is reckless and he just comes across as poor white trash.

    People here at Unz worship this guy, but he is just slightly better than a random guy you find on the street.

    You’re a Dem shill, that much is clear. The tiresome: “finger on the button” nonsense is not helping your cases against Trump. Obama had no experience in 2008 except being a community organizer and junior senator with very little experience. Trump will settle in fine once he’s POTUS, you just need to ignore the MSM and their pro-Killary shilling which has now reached fever pitch.

    BTW: Trump did exactly the right thing taking the Khans to task. They, along with Hillary, exploited the legacy of their dead son in order to attack Trump. Such behavior is disgusting and unforgivable.

    Polls have now narrowed as of today and Hillary’s post convention bump was smaller than Trump’s.

    Read More
    • Replies: @exiled off mainstreet
    While I agree with your view of the whole affair as noted above, I think it is unfair to characterise Mr. Margolis as a democratic shill, since his earlier writings, and even this one, but to not a great enough extent, are critical of the harpy war criminal.
  20. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Rehmat
    Nyeth Margolis, there several beliefs common amongst the 72 Muslim sects around the world which cannot be found in Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism or Hinduism or Sikhism, such as; 1) there only one Creator (Allah), 2) Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) ends the Divine Messengership began with the first human on Earth, Adam, 3) Holy Qur'an is the final and non-corrupted revelation of the Creator.

    Nationalism, like the so-called 'antisemitism' is a European product introduced to the Muslim world by the European colonialists.

    Shai'ite -Sunni divide is based on political and not on Islamic religious teachings. It started over 100 years after the death of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), but was exploited by the western colonialists and imperial powers. Currently, the main actors behind the Shi'ite-Sunni divide are Saudi Arabia, Turkey, UAE, and Israel.

    The concept of nationalism originated in Europe in the 17th century after the Protestant movement challenged the authority of Catholic Church (Vatican). The western nations came into existence on the basis of common language, culture and shared history. After the break of Papal authority – there was no religious ground to unite the Christian world. Since Islamic Shri’ah bonds both the faith and politics – Islam have survived the western separation of religion from the State’s authority – fuelling the anti-religious plague of secularism – the power of a few over the rest of the humanity.

    No matter, how much the westerners love to live in ‘self-denial’ – they cannot erase their long past and present history of religious, national and colored bigotry. Twenty centuries of common religion (Christianity) has failed to unite them, except, during the Crusades or Ottoman’s conquests of Europe. The current proud pall-bearers of Judeo-Christianity always put their heads between their legs when they’re reminded that Jews were always persecuted within Christian European nations – while during the same period of time – the Jews were living in their ‘Golden Age’ in Muslim Spain.

    This western nationalist plague has never died – and always returns with more aggressive fascism. For example the systematic extermination of over 100 million American Natives and 80-100 million of Africans for European slave trade – and the two great World Wars (WW I & II) of the 20th century were fought on nationalism – though over 100 million of its aggressors and victims happened to be Christian, followed by Gypsies, Jews – and expulsion of eleven million Germans from Eastern Europe. Muslims, too, have share of ‘national’ victimization – Bosnian (persecuted as ‘Turk’, which they’re not); Chechen (persecuted as ‘Asian’); Native Palestinian (persecuted by European Jew invaders as ‘Arabs’); Kurds (persecuted as ‘non-Turk’), and Kosovar (persecuted as ‘Albanian’).

    During the 20th century – western imperialism made more people refugees 9over 60 million) on national, religious and ethnic reasons than any other century before. The great majority of these refugees happen to be Muslims – from Palestine, Kashmir, Chechnya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Bosnia, Kosovar, Philippines, and Thailand.

    Contrary to western nationalism and racism – Islamic ‘Brotherhood (Ummah)’ provides the solution to barbaric history of nationalism, race and religion. Muslims, Christian and Jews have lived in peace and friendship since the creation of first Islamic City State of Meddinah in 622 CE. Until the Ottoman Khilaphat was dissolved by Crypto-Jew, General Kemal Pasha, in 1920s – the majority of its Grand Wazirs (Prime Ministers) were not Turkish, but Albanian, Greek Christians, Croats, Cherkessians and Jews. In Muslim history, it doesn’t matter whether Ghazi Salah-Uddin al-Ayubi – the liberator of Al-Quds (1186 CE), was a Kurd, Syrian or Tatar – what it matters is that he was a devout Muslim.

    https://rehmat1.com/2008/10/31/western-nationalism-vs-islamic-brotherhood/

    You have a very SELECTIVE interpretation of history. You cherry-pick “facts” to suit your Muslim / immigrant agenda.

    In short YOU ARE A BULLSHIT ARTIST.

    Read More
  21. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Rehmat
    That's fine with Islam.

    Islam emphasizes on QUALITY and not QUANTITY. It doesn't like SHEEP like in Christianity or Judaism.

    “Islam never had to go through a prolonged period of critically examining the validity of its spiritual vision, as the West did during the 18th century. Islamic culture has, of course, known its own crisis… yet it was never forced to question its traditional worldview,” – writes the historian Louis Dupre.

    “On the one hand, Islam is viewed positively, even enthusiastically, as a purified form of revealed religion, stripped of the many imperfections of Judaism and Christianity, and hence reassuringly akin to deism. On the other, Islam is more often regarded with hostility and contempt as a primitive, grossly superstitious religion like Judaism and Christianity, and one no less, or still more, adapted to promoting despotism,” – Jonathan Israel in 'Radical Enlightenment'.

    https://rehmat1.com/2009/08/06/islam-doesnt-need-enlightenment/

    “..never force to question its traditional world-view..”

    People who question Islam tend to lose their heads.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    Nyeth Moshe - more people have lost their head, freedom, and livelihood by questioning the Holocaust myth.

    Native-born Canadian citizen of Germany Monika Schaefer is a music teacher in Alberta, Canada. She is being chased by the country’s Organized Jewry for posting two videos on You-Tube (watch below) claiming that Zionists’ story of Holocaust is a hoax created by Zionist Jews to demonize German nation.

    Early this month Green Party of Canada expelled her under pressure from powerful Jewish Lobby.

    In one of the videos, entitled Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust, she talks about being teased as a child of German immigrants.

    Schaefer says as a young girl she confronted her parents about why they didn’t do anything to stop the Jewish genocide. They replied they didn’t know it was happening. Schaefer says her parents didn’t know about the genocide because these things did not happen.


    https://rehmat1.com/2016/07/19/sorry-mom-i-was-wrong-about-holocaust/
  22. anon says: • Disclaimer

    You can say whatever you want Mr. Margolis. Ending Muslim immigration to the west would be the best option for the west by far.

    The general characteristics of Muslim countries are poverty, ignorance, backwardness and no freedom.

    Read More
  23. jtgw says: • Website

    I imagine Trump is speaking to a crowd of people who generally hate Muslims and don’t find the Khans sympathetic either as heroes or victims. What offends them is not that the Democrats cynically used the Khans to distract the audience from Hillary’s previous support for that war, but that a Muslim was held up for admiration at all. For them, the problem with Iraq is not that we attacked that country unprovoked, but that we stayed and tried to fix it afterwards. I expect their preferred MidEast policy is just to nuke the whole place and have done with it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Not true. My preferred Mideast policy would be to have nothing to do with the whole region. I would trade with them but that's all. Don't invade the Mideast and don't invite the Mideast. If it were up to me the Mideast would be about as important to America as it is to Mexico.

    The BIG PROBLEM, though, is that America has an extremely powerful Jewish lobby. They care passionately about one of those particular countries in the Mideast and use their influence to keep America involved in the region. It's not oil btw. America actually imports very little of its oil from this area.
  24. @J1234
    This was just the standard setup for Trump: Give some little guy who's suffered a tragedy (like losing a son) a free spot at the convention to attack the big guy. Then get a reporter to ask the big guy about the little guy's remark. And if the big guy is Trump, it doesn't matter how empathetic he is to the little guy (and he was), if he defends himself against the little guy in any way, the headline is going to read: BIG GUY ATTACKS LITTLE GUY AND HIS DEAD SON!

    Actually, Republicans do the same thing, too, but the press just isn't nearly as complicit in the process. Every time poll numbers change, the press points at some causality, and this week it was this. How many times has Trump made much more outrageous statements, and his numbers went up?

    Actually, unfortunately once the attention had gone elsewhere, it was revealed that the “little guy” was not such an innocent, since he was a long associate of the Clintons, even doing their taxes, and since he was an advocate of the superiority of sharia law to western models, revealing his waving of the constitution to be a phony ploy, particularly since he was making his large income off of the immigration laws he was shilling for in his speech in his argument they are constitutionally mandated. I agree that Trump should have stuck with Hillary’s role in starting the Iraq war rather than critiquing the stereotype Muslim wife put forward to bait Trump, but it the whole exercise was indeed a cynical ploy by the Clinton cabal, and as this guy’s background more fully leaks out, the damage will be certainly reduced. At least Trump was not foolish enough to say the dead son was a hero, not a quisling working for a hostile occupation.

    Read More
  25. @ChrisD
    You're a Dem shill, that much is clear. The tiresome: "finger on the button" nonsense is not helping your cases against Trump. Obama had no experience in 2008 except being a community organizer and junior senator with very little experience. Trump will settle in fine once he's POTUS, you just need to ignore the MSM and their pro-Killary shilling which has now reached fever pitch.

    BTW: Trump did exactly the right thing taking the Khans to task. They, along with Hillary, exploited the legacy of their dead son in order to attack Trump. Such behavior is disgusting and unforgivable.

    Polls have now narrowed as of today and Hillary's post convention bump was smaller than Trump's.

    While I agree with your view of the whole affair as noted above, I think it is unfair to characterise Mr. Margolis as a democratic shill, since his earlier writings, and even this one, but to not a great enough extent, are critical of the harpy war criminal.

    Read More
  26. @Priss Factor
    When a train is derailed, you get it back on track. You get it going again, and you have to maintain the momentum.

    Granted, the media are laying lots of obstacles on the tracks.

    This is where alternative media have to do the job to clear the BS debris.

    Problem is Trump keeps getting sidetracked by trivia that are meant to bait him.

    I don’t disagree, especially about (((the mainstream media)))….but Trump has no one to blame but himself. He’s turned out to be a moron who doesn’t know when to keep his big mouth shut, and how to choose battles wisely. When he loses, and he will lose, it will be no one else’s fault but his own.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stephen R. Diamond

    He’s turned out to be a moron
     
    The IQ experts were telling you this long ago.
  27. Marcus says:

    This site’s worst writer strikes again.

    Donald Trump’s ignorant and stupid anti-Muslim policies

    Really? Clinton and Obama are responsible for millions of Muslim deaths whereas, to the best of my knowledge, Trump hasn’t hurt a single one.

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish

    Donald Trump’s ignorant and stupid anti-Muslim policies
     
    Trump isn't anti-Muslim, that is LLSM and Leftist propaganda, Trump is anti-terrorism. And while not every Muslim is a terrorist, most terrorists are Muslim. And Eric Margolis is an idiot who seems to think we are too.
  28. woodNfish says:

    Trump’s Mouth Is His Worst Enemy

    Only if you’re an ignorant moron like Margolis who apparently enjoys being lied to by the Left. We love Trump because he says what he thinks and doesn’t try to hide behind PC. You’re obviously too stupid to figure that out Margolis.

    Here’s what I’m thinking, Don’t piss on my neck and say that it’s raining. Hillary Clinton will piss on your neck and whisper in your ear that it’s raining. Donald Trump will stand behind you and piss on your neck, but he’ll tell you, “I’m pissing on you right now. How do you like that?”

    I like to know, at least, what I’m getting.

    I’m voting for Trump.

    source: http://www.unz.com/ldinh/obscured-american-hank-the-small-business-financial-advisor/

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Rebel
    Feel free to love Trump all you want for saying what he thinks....but him speaking his mind all the time is what will cause him to lose this election. I understand why you like that about him....but I'd rather he win this election, which he now will not, thanks to him speaking his mind.
  29. woodNfish says:
    @Anonymous
    Trump is looking more and more like a prole who is unfit to be president.

    Only to people like you who let the LLSM lead them by the nose.

    Read More
  30. woodNfish says:
    @Marcus
    This site's worst writer strikes again.

    Donald Trump’s ignorant and stupid anti-Muslim policies
     
    Really? Clinton and Obama are responsible for millions of Muslim deaths whereas, to the best of my knowledge, Trump hasn't hurt a single one.

    Donald Trump’s ignorant and stupid anti-Muslim policies

    Trump isn’t anti-Muslim, that is LLSM and Leftist propaganda, Trump is anti-terrorism. And while not every Muslim is a terrorist, most terrorists are Muslim. And Eric Margolis is an idiot who seems to think we are too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    Maybe Margolis is senile, but I don't remember ever being impressed by his "work."
  31. @woodNfish

    Trump's Mouth Is His Worst Enemy
     
    Only if you're an ignorant moron like Margolis who apparently enjoys being lied to by the Left. We love Trump because he says what he thinks and doesn't try to hide behind PC. You're obviously too stupid to figure that out Margolis.

    Here’s what I’m thinking, Don’t piss on my neck and say that it’s raining. Hillary Clinton will piss on your neck and whisper in your ear that it’s raining. Donald Trump will stand behind you and piss on your neck, but he’ll tell you, “I’m pissing on you right now. How do you like that?”

    I like to know, at least, what I’m getting.

    I'm voting for Trump.
     
    source: http://www.unz.com/ldinh/obscured-american-hank-the-small-business-financial-advisor/

    Feel free to love Trump all you want for saying what he thinks….but him speaking his mind all the time is what will cause him to lose this election. I understand why you like that about him….but I’d rather he win this election, which he now will not, thanks to him speaking his mind.

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish
    If Trump loses, it will not be because he speaks his mind, but because the LLSM has influenced the election.

    http://www.infowars.com/video-abc-cuts-live-stream-when-trump-starts-talking-about-hillarys-support-for-isis/

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/08/business/balance-fairness-and-a-proudly-provocative-presidential-candidate.html
  32. LondonBob says:

    Stenphanopolus set him up with that comment, very subtle way it was done, led straight into it. Why even do an interview with a known Clinton advocate on a known Clinton supporting network.

    Read More
  33. woodNfish says:
    @John Rebel
    Feel free to love Trump all you want for saying what he thinks....but him speaking his mind all the time is what will cause him to lose this election. I understand why you like that about him....but I'd rather he win this election, which he now will not, thanks to him speaking his mind.
    Read More
    • Replies: @John Rebel
    No doubt they are influencing the election. I still think that had Trump been much more tactful and professional, he would be winning this thing easily, despite their influence. He could have made his points without sounding like such a damn buffoon....and some things, he just should not have said at all, such as the comments about the Latino judge and the Khans.
  34. Marcus says:
    @woodNfish

    Donald Trump’s ignorant and stupid anti-Muslim policies
     
    Trump isn't anti-Muslim, that is LLSM and Leftist propaganda, Trump is anti-terrorism. And while not every Muslim is a terrorist, most terrorists are Muslim. And Eric Margolis is an idiot who seems to think we are too.

    Maybe Margolis is senile, but I don’t remember ever being impressed by his “work.”

    Read More
  35. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @jtgw
    I imagine Trump is speaking to a crowd of people who generally hate Muslims and don't find the Khans sympathetic either as heroes or victims. What offends them is not that the Democrats cynically used the Khans to distract the audience from Hillary's previous support for that war, but that a Muslim was held up for admiration at all. For them, the problem with Iraq is not that we attacked that country unprovoked, but that we stayed and tried to fix it afterwards. I expect their preferred MidEast policy is just to nuke the whole place and have done with it.

    Not true. My preferred Mideast policy would be to have nothing to do with the whole region. I would trade with them but that’s all. Don’t invade the Mideast and don’t invite the Mideast. If it were up to me the Mideast would be about as important to America as it is to Mexico.

    The BIG PROBLEM, though, is that America has an extremely powerful Jewish lobby. They care passionately about one of those particular countries in the Mideast and use their influence to keep America involved in the region. It’s not oil btw. America actually imports very little of its oil from this area.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jtgw
    Well, I applaud your moderation, but honestly I have spoken to a lot of alt-righters who think we just haven't killed enough Muslims, not that we have killed too many. I am more sympathetic to the idea of restricting immigration from countries that we are effectively at war with, but at best that is a bandage to be applied to the suppurating wound of our aggressive foreign policy. We would be making a lot of innocent Muslim immigrants pay for the anger we inspire across the Muslim world by our actions.
  36. jtgw says: • Website
    @anon
    Not true. My preferred Mideast policy would be to have nothing to do with the whole region. I would trade with them but that's all. Don't invade the Mideast and don't invite the Mideast. If it were up to me the Mideast would be about as important to America as it is to Mexico.

    The BIG PROBLEM, though, is that America has an extremely powerful Jewish lobby. They care passionately about one of those particular countries in the Mideast and use their influence to keep America involved in the region. It's not oil btw. America actually imports very little of its oil from this area.

    Well, I applaud your moderation, but honestly I have spoken to a lot of alt-righters who think we just haven’t killed enough Muslims, not that we have killed too many. I am more sympathetic to the idea of restricting immigration from countries that we are effectively at war with, but at best that is a bandage to be applied to the suppurating wound of our aggressive foreign policy. We would be making a lot of innocent Muslim immigrants pay for the anger we inspire across the Muslim world by our actions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    ".....a lot of innocent Muslim immigrants..."

    Immigration is only a privilege, not a right. People need to understand this and understand it at a deep level. There is no Muslim "right" to immigrate to the USA, Canada, France, Germany etc.

    I do agree that Muslim immigration when we have such adversarial relations with so many Islamic countries is very dangerous. But even without any of that (imagine we had a Swiss-style foreign policy) Muslims are a bad fit for a modern, secular society.
  37. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    “Donald Trump’s ignorant and stupid anti-Muslim policies

    You lost me there, Eric Margolis. No one living outside the US has a constitutional right to immigrate to our country. The government has full jurisdiction to ban anyone it wants for any reason at all for immigration proposes. If the gov’t decides it wants to ban a ban on fat people, skinny people, Muslim people, old people, young people, tall people, short people etc. from immigrating, it can do that… No foreigner has a constitutional right to move to America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Thank you. Excellent points. Some people tend to think of immigration as almost akin to some kind of "civil right". It is only a privilege, to be extended or rescinded at the will of the host country.

    Personally with a population approaching a third of a billion and untold millions of illegal aliens, I don't see why the USA needs ANY immigrants at all.
  38. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    “Let’s not forget the targeted US bombing campaign – supported by Sen. Clinton – that destroyed Iraq’s water purification system and sewage treatment plants.”

    Don’t you have your timeline mixed up here? Didn’t that bombing occurred under GHW Bush while Clinton was the Governor’s Lady in Little Rock?

    Read More
    • Replies: @unadorned
    Hillary was a senator from 2001--2009 and she voted to invade Iraq.
  39. @woodNfish
    If Trump loses, it will not be because he speaks his mind, but because the LLSM has influenced the election.

    http://www.infowars.com/video-abc-cuts-live-stream-when-trump-starts-talking-about-hillarys-support-for-isis/

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/08/business/balance-fairness-and-a-proudly-provocative-presidential-candidate.html

    No doubt they are influencing the election. I still think that had Trump been much more tactful and professional, he would be winning this thing easily, despite their influence. He could have made his points without sounding like such a damn buffoon….and some things, he just should not have said at all, such as the comments about the Latino judge and the Khans.

    Read More
  40. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @jtgw
    Well, I applaud your moderation, but honestly I have spoken to a lot of alt-righters who think we just haven't killed enough Muslims, not that we have killed too many. I am more sympathetic to the idea of restricting immigration from countries that we are effectively at war with, but at best that is a bandage to be applied to the suppurating wound of our aggressive foreign policy. We would be making a lot of innocent Muslim immigrants pay for the anger we inspire across the Muslim world by our actions.

    “…..a lot of innocent Muslim immigrants…”

    Immigration is only a privilege, not a right. People need to understand this and understand it at a deep level. There is no Muslim “right” to immigrate to the USA, Canada, France, Germany etc.

    I do agree that Muslim immigration when we have such adversarial relations with so many Islamic countries is very dangerous. But even without any of that (imagine we had a Swiss-style foreign policy) Muslims are a bad fit for a modern, secular society.

    Read More
  41. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Anonymous
    "Donald Trump’s ignorant and stupid anti-Muslim policies

    You lost me there, Eric Margolis. No one living outside the US has a constitutional right to immigrate to our country. The government has full jurisdiction to ban anyone it wants for any reason at all for immigration proposes. If the gov't decides it wants to ban a ban on fat people, skinny people, Muslim people, old people, young people, tall people, short people etc. from immigrating, it can do that... No foreigner has a constitutional right to move to America.

    Thank you. Excellent points. Some people tend to think of immigration as almost akin to some kind of “civil right”. It is only a privilege, to be extended or rescinded at the will of the host country.

    Personally with a population approaching a third of a billion and untold millions of illegal aliens, I don’t see why the USA needs ANY immigrants at all.

    Read More
  42. Rehmat says:
    @anon
    "..never force to question its traditional world-view.."

    People who question Islam tend to lose their heads.

    Nyeth Moshe – more people have lost their head, freedom, and livelihood by questioning the Holocaust myth.

    Native-born Canadian citizen of Germany Monika Schaefer is a music teacher in Alberta, Canada. She is being chased by the country’s Organized Jewry for posting two videos on You-Tube (watch below) claiming that Zionists’ story of Holocaust is a hoax created by Zionist Jews to demonize German nation.

    Early this month Green Party of Canada expelled her under pressure from powerful Jewish Lobby.

    In one of the videos, entitled Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust, she talks about being teased as a child of German immigrants.

    Schaefer says as a young girl she confronted her parents about why they didn’t do anything to stop the Jewish genocide. They replied they didn’t know it was happening. Schaefer says her parents didn’t know about the genocide because these things did not happen.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/07/19/sorry-mom-i-was-wrong-about-holocaust/

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    You equate what has happened to Monika Schaefer with what happened to Pym Fortuyn or Theo Van Gogh? To say nothing of countless thousands of others? She still has her head on her shoulders sport. What a totally ridiculous oranges and apples comparison.

    More people have lost their head questioning the Holocaust myth then Islam?

    PURE TOTAL BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Give me some solid statistics and sources on Jews who are allegedly going around decapitating people who doubt the Holocaust????

    What do you think would happen to somebody who walked around Mecca with a sign saying Islam was a lie and the Prophet was a fraud and a madman? How long before such a person would be killed? Would you be killed in a western country for carrying a sign saying Jesus was not the son of god? Of course not.
  43. Rehmat says:

    Donald Trump can be excused for his ignorance of “oppressed women in Muslim world” because he is a product of Western world where Islamic history is written by Zionist Jews and Evangelic Christians.

    Women have been oppressed all around the world, religiously (Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc.) and culturally for centuries. So is the case in the abuse of women’s rights in various cultures previalent in the Muslim world. However, no honest and educated person could blame Islam for such abuses. Islam liberated women over 1400 years ago – at the time when the women were treated as a male property with no legal rights in the so-called “Western Civilization”. Find out the truth here and watch a video at the end of this post.

    How many westerners know that American women were NOT allowed to vote until August 26, 1920? The US Constitution was amended (Amendment 19), which allowed the women to vote in both state and presidential elections. Women in western countries were given the rights to vote – in Norway (1913), in Britain and Canada (1918), in Germany (1919), in France (1944), in Italy (1945), in Greece (1952) and in Switzerland (1971). German Chancellor Markel is the first women head of state of that country. The world is waiting to see a woman lead the government in the US, France, Australia and Russia. Contrary to that, women had been the leaders of the governments in Muslim countries, such as, Pakistan, Bangladesh (its current prime minister is a woman), Indonesia and Turkey.

    Women in Islamic Iran, Pakistan, Turkey, Bosnia, Hizb’Allah and Hamas can be found in leading positions in almost every sector of the society, such as education, healthcare, CEOs, government, parliament, judiciary and police. Women are recruited in Armed Forces of several Muslim nation-states – but with the exception of Islamic, they are not allowed to participate in active duty during a war. In order to combat sexual abuses in male-dominated military – Islamic Iran has created an independent Women Armed Force with its own commanding officer who is answerable only to the Spiritual Leader, Ayatullah Ali Khamenei, who, under Iranian Constitution, is the C-in-C of Iranian Armed Forces. In comparasion, the so-called “Women equality” promoter, the US – its Armed forces (200,000-women-strong) – is reported to have one out of every three female soldier experienced sexual abuse as compared to one in six women in the civilian world (CBS News).

    https://rehmat1.com/2010/03/06/liberating-muslim-women/

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Yeah, your right, ,,,

    women in Muslim countries enjoy far more freedom then in the west....sure they do.

    One almost has to wonder why you LEFT your Muslim paradise to invite yourself to the west, sport.

    We both know the reason. But you will never admit it.
  44. Rehmat says:
    @Kyle a
    "All sorts of Muslims" one Muslim is plenty. For the last time Eric, we got the last of the decent Persians over thirty years ago. Go rest your neck.

    One Zionist US-Israel citizen is enough …..

    Read More
  45. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Rehmat
    Nyeth Moshe - more people have lost their head, freedom, and livelihood by questioning the Holocaust myth.

    Native-born Canadian citizen of Germany Monika Schaefer is a music teacher in Alberta, Canada. She is being chased by the country’s Organized Jewry for posting two videos on You-Tube (watch below) claiming that Zionists’ story of Holocaust is a hoax created by Zionist Jews to demonize German nation.

    Early this month Green Party of Canada expelled her under pressure from powerful Jewish Lobby.

    In one of the videos, entitled Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust, she talks about being teased as a child of German immigrants.

    Schaefer says as a young girl she confronted her parents about why they didn’t do anything to stop the Jewish genocide. They replied they didn’t know it was happening. Schaefer says her parents didn’t know about the genocide because these things did not happen.


    https://rehmat1.com/2016/07/19/sorry-mom-i-was-wrong-about-holocaust/

    You equate what has happened to Monika Schaefer with what happened to Pym Fortuyn or Theo Van Gogh? To say nothing of countless thousands of others? She still has her head on her shoulders sport. What a totally ridiculous oranges and apples comparison.

    More people have lost their head questioning the Holocaust myth then Islam?

    PURE TOTAL BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Give me some solid statistics and sources on Jews who are allegedly going around decapitating people who doubt the Holocaust????

    What do you think would happen to somebody who walked around Mecca with a sign saying Islam was a lie and the Prophet was a fraud and a madman? How long before such a person would be killed? Would you be killed in a western country for carrying a sign saying Jesus was not the son of god? Of course not.

    Read More
  46. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Rehmat
    Donald Trump can be excused for his ignorance of "oppressed women in Muslim world" because he is a product of Western world where Islamic history is written by Zionist Jews and Evangelic Christians.

    Women have been oppressed all around the world, religiously (Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc.) and culturally for centuries. So is the case in the abuse of women’s rights in various cultures previalent in the Muslim world. However, no honest and educated person could blame Islam for such abuses. Islam liberated women over 1400 years ago – at the time when the women were treated as a male property with no legal rights in the so-called “Western Civilization”. Find out the truth here and watch a video at the end of this post.

    How many westerners know that American women were NOT allowed to vote until August 26, 1920? The US Constitution was amended (Amendment 19), which allowed the women to vote in both state and presidential elections. Women in western countries were given the rights to vote – in Norway (1913), in Britain and Canada (1918), in Germany (1919), in France (1944), in Italy (1945), in Greece (1952) and in Switzerland (1971). German Chancellor Markel is the first women head of state of that country. The world is waiting to see a woman lead the government in the US, France, Australia and Russia. Contrary to that, women had been the leaders of the governments in Muslim countries, such as, Pakistan, Bangladesh (its current prime minister is a woman), Indonesia and Turkey.

    Women in Islamic Iran, Pakistan, Turkey, Bosnia, Hizb’Allah and Hamas can be found in leading positions in almost every sector of the society, such as education, healthcare, CEOs, government, parliament, judiciary and police. Women are recruited in Armed Forces of several Muslim nation-states – but with the exception of Islamic, they are not allowed to participate in active duty during a war. In order to combat sexual abuses in male-dominated military – Islamic Iran has created an independent Women Armed Force with its own commanding officer who is answerable only to the Spiritual Leader, Ayatullah Ali Khamenei, who, under Iranian Constitution, is the C-in-C of Iranian Armed Forces. In comparasion, the so-called “Women equality” promoter, the US – its Armed forces (200,000-women-strong) – is reported to have one out of every three female soldier experienced sexual abuse as compared to one in six women in the civilian world (CBS News).

    https://rehmat1.com/2010/03/06/liberating-muslim-women/

    Yeah, your right, ,,,

    women in Muslim countries enjoy far more freedom then in the west….sure they do.

    One almost has to wonder why you LEFT your Muslim paradise to invite yourself to the west, sport.

    We both know the reason. But you will never admit it.

    Read More
  47. unadorned says:
    @Anonymous
    "Let’s not forget the targeted US bombing campaign – supported by Sen. Clinton – that destroyed Iraq’s water purification system and sewage treatment plants."

    Don't you have your timeline mixed up here? Didn't that bombing occurred under GHW Bush while Clinton was the Governor's Lady in Little Rock?

    Hillary was a senator from 2001–2009 and she voted to invade Iraq.

    Read More
  48. @John Rebel
    I don't disagree, especially about (((the mainstream media)))....but Trump has no one to blame but himself. He's turned out to be a moron who doesn't know when to keep his big mouth shut, and how to choose battles wisely. When he loses, and he will lose, it will be no one else's fault but his own.

    He’s turned out to be a moron

    The IQ experts were telling you this long ago.

    Read More
  49. Bob Sugar says:

    Should we let ourselves believe there was any artful way to navigate the Khan trap, in the face of “the second amendment people, maybe….i don’t know” being spun into “he’s dog-whistling he wants someone to get Hillary”?

    There really is a mass hysteria on right now and it’s incredible. The left completely lost its mind during the GWB administration and it’s doubling down on it’s lunacy in the face of a potential Trump administration, such that Bush Derangement Syndrome is starting to look tame in comparison. There’s talk of people getting physically ill over it. The media is solely to blame for this.

    I don’t need to like my president. I don’t need him to like me. I don’t need him to be a Rhodes scholar. I don’t need him to be a veteran. I don’t need him to be “presidential,” whatever the hell that means. I don’t need him to sympathize with the plight of women and minorities.

    I need him to be effective. I need him to represent my interests. I need to know that he will put my American children over those of people living in other countries. He can do that and still be a boorish asshole who sticks his foot in his mouth from time to time and comes down hard on people who flip him shit, even if they think they’re above reproach because they’re “Gold Star parents.”

    Let women fret over manners. Our future is at stake.

    Read More
  50. “What has a Muslim in Indonesia have in common with a Moroccan Muslim? Nothing, save a vague attachment to the Muslim faith.”

    What is “vague” doing in that sentence? No doubt some Muslims of both nationalities have only a vague attachment to their religion, but some Muslims of both nationalities have attachments so non-vague that they are motivated to engage in homicidal attacks. And the common thread is the religion that urges those attacks.

    As to, “The Khan’s(sic) dignified response to Trump’s boorish behavior shamed him and upset many voters”, there is something very wrong with Mr. Margolis if he associates dignity with the serial liars I saw at the Democrat convention. Never mind the lying about what would be found in the Constitution “if” Trump read it, there is the later matter of Khizr Khan, sharia scholar when he isn’t making a good living off of the E-5b immigration scam, denying that there is any such thing as commonality of sharia between Muslim legal systems. Cutting off hands for thievery is apparentlya holdover from “British, French or Portuguese” legal regimes. Or did you miss that howler?

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Eric Margolis Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Bin Laden is dead, but his strategy still bleeds the United States.
Egyptians revolted against American rule as well as Mubarak’s.
“America’s strategic and economic interests in the Mideast and Muslim world are being threatened by the agony in Palestine, which inevitably invites terrorist attacks against US citizens and property.”
A menace grows from Bush’s Korean blind spot.
Far from being a model for a “liberated” Iraq, Afghanistan shows how the U.S. can get bogged down Soviet-style.