The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewEric Margolis Archive
Let Koreans Settle Their Own Problems
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Springtime in Korea. Peace and love have erupted all over the mountainous peninsula as the leaders of the two rival nations seek to end the nearly seven decades of hostility between them.

One can’t underestimate the passionate longing felt by most Koreans on both sides of the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) for some form of reunification – or at least reattachment – of the two nations. Amazingly, the 1950-53 Korean War has never been ended by a peace treaty so a simmering state of war exists between North and South Korea in spite of past attempts to end it. During the war, 33,686 Americans died and 128,600 were wounded, and the two Koreas suffered over 2 million dead. Chinese casualties were heavy.

The DMZ is probably the most heavily militarized frontier in the world, with hundreds of thousands of tough troops and thousands of tanks and guns confronting one another. I’ve seen few more impressive military sights. Only the Pakistani-India border in Kashmir offers a similar martial display and menace.

Kudos go to the leaders of North and South Korea for de-escalating the tensions between them. Both deserve a Nobel peace prize. Kim Jong-un and Moon Jai-in have made a great leap forward by trying to end the Korean War. Most Koreans – except for hard rightwing anti-Communist Christians in South Korea – are thrilled.

As a very long-time observer and friend of Korea, I too am elated by the Moon-Kim friendly summit and wish it success. But I’m also worried by the role of Washington.
President Donald Trump certainly broke the ice with North Korea and played a key role in setting peace talks into motion. Kudos to him.

But I’m also apprehensive that the so-called de-nuclearization issue may ruin the effort to end the Korean War. Washington demands that North Korea account for and then dismantle its nuclear weapons under US supervision. This is the key American position.

Interestingly, while making these demands, the US is pushing ahead with a new `smaller’ nuclear warhead program, the B61- Model 12, designed as a deep earth penetrator and for use against tactical targets. This $1 trillion program is designed for war-fighting, not deterrence. Critics warn it will make a nuclear war much more likely.

North Korea, which has a small number of long-ranged, nuclear tipped missiles of undetermined reliability, says its will ‘de-nuclearize’ to meet Washington’s demands. But why? North Korea is demanding ‘reciprocity’ from the US. So far, there is no sign of the US agreeing to shut its air bases in South Korea or Japan, remove nuclear weapons from North Asia, or remove some or all of its 28,500 troops in South Korea.

ORDER IT NOW

The Trump administration has convinced itself that a one-way deal with North Korea is possible. Its resident hardliners, John Bolton and Mike Pompeo, are believed to be hostile to any US concessions. They want North Korea to unconditionally surrender, not negotiate. Both are neocons who fear North Korea’s nukes might find their way to Israel’s mideast enemies. A deal between Washington and Pyongyang under President Bill Clinton was sabotaged by the neocons for this very reason.

North Koreans have been eating grass for a generation to acquire nuclear weapons. Would they give them up just for a slap on the back from Washington? Would China push Pyongyang in this direction? Highly doubtful. The world is only talking to Kim Jong-un because he has and can deliver nuclear weapons.
Even a lot of South Koreans are proud of Kim for making the mighty US back off.

South Korea’s president, Moon, has done bravura work in his new ‘sunshine’ policy.’ He is a courageous and clever man and a welcome change from South Korea’s former rightwing leaders who were totally under the thumb of the US. Koreans will do much better at settling their many differences if they are allowed to work out their problems without heavy-handed interference by outsiders, be they Americans or Chinese.

A good way to begin would be for the US to end its punishing economic warfare against North Korea and permanently halt its provocative military exercises each fall.

Two great powers, the US and Japan, are not eager to see Korea reunified into a powerhouse with 80 million industrious people. They will continue stirring the Korean pot.

(Republished from EricMargolis.com by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 11 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Alistair says:

    All the credits should go to president Moon Jai-In for containing our novice president from a rash nuclear attack on North Korea.

    the Trump Administration policy toward north Korea is simply dumb; John Bolton said: “US considering Libya as model for North Korean denuclearization” – that’s so laughable; we all know what happened in Libya and to its leader Moammar Gadhafi; and that’s what John Bolton offering to Kim Jong-Un, it’s so ridiculous to assume that North Korea will give up its Nukes, embracing the same destiny as Muammar Gaddafi of Libya.

    It appears both Koreas are looking forward for appeasement, peace, and perhaps reunification, so, if that’s what they really want, then US has no business to interfering; why after 65 years of ceasefire, US still maintaining such large military presence in the Korean peninsula – the old masters of the 1953 Korean war are no longer military belligerents but America’s commercial partners; China and Russia have embraced the market economy and eager to please America – an export market for their products; so, why the US keeps poking at China.

    As to America’s newly designed smaller nuclear warheads, deep earth penetrating bombs; they are probably intended for IRAN; Mr. Trump is so itching to use its Nukes somewhere, and Iran seems to be the most probable target, that certainly makes the American-Zionists and Israel very happy, and that’s why President Putin of Russia said it so bluntly: “You never listened to us, now you listen; if you use a nuclear weapon; large, small, medium, on Russia or its allies, we will respond instantly with nuclear weapons, and I’m not bluffing.” Putin said it in his speech on March 01, 2018, – and that’s what Putin has probably repeated in his private meeting with Trump, which made Trump to look so miserable during their joint press conference in Helsinki; where he looked like a school kid facing the principle.

    If both Koreas are heading for appeasement and peace then US has no business to interfering with the Korean Peninsula – Trump should stop playing around with his Nukes, he could play more Golf instead.

    • Replies: @Jeff Davis
  2. ‘Even a lot of South Koreans are proud of Kim for making the mighty US back off.’ Eighty percent of them, at last count. He’ll be united Korea’s fir President and Moon his PM. Or vice-versa.

    • Replies: @Jeff Davis
  3. Anon[323] • Disclaimer says:

    Kors will settle own problems if South Kors show some spine against Washington. But no.

  4. anon[146] • Disclaimer says:

    If the USA was not such a masochistic country it would leave the Korean peninsula altogether.

  5. Renoman says:

    Everyone wants the Americans to fuck off, even the Americans.

    • Replies: @F0337
  6. South Korea needs to develop their own thermonuclear weapons; that is the only meaningful deterrent to a possible North Korean attack when the USA leaves. Everyone can see that the Norks would make the SKs their bitch otherwise. The USA should offer to lease Trident missiles to SK which they could base any way they want; we already do that with the UK.

    As for the USA nukes, we need to withdraw from the nuclear test ban regime and begin underground testing. And we need to start expansion of our nuke force; this will take renewed production of Tritium and Oralloy. Big mistake to minimize USA nuke force, just like it was a mistake to destroy all our B-52G bombers to make Russia happy.

    • Replies: @Alistair
  7. Alistair says:
    @Joe Stalin

    Reunification should be the end game here, not nuclear proliferation;
    Just like East and West Germany that have reunified, North and South Korea can reunite again; we shouldn’t forget that North and South Korea are the same people, same culture, same language, same history, and it appears they’re heading for appeasement, peace, and perhaps reunification, the US should encourage that, not nuclear proliferation.

  8. @Godfree Roberts

    Bullseye!

    They will be feted as the two heroes of the soon-to-be modern, reunified Korea.

  9. Borjedman says:

    Eric Margolis’s bias, always anti-democratic, is showing. Only two countries that don’t want Korean reunification? What about China? What about CHINA?

  10. F0337 says:
    @Renoman

    Bolton and the people he works for want instability and strife everywhere, all the time. Except in their own ‘neighborhoods’ don’t you know..

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Eric Margolis Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Bin Laden is dead, but his strategy still bleeds the United States.
Egyptians revolted against American rule as well as Mubarak’s.
“America’s strategic and economic interests in the Mideast and Muslim world are being threatened by the agony in...
A menace grows from Bush’s Korean blind spot.
Far from being a model for a “liberated” Iraq, Afghanistan shows how the U.S. can get bogged down Soviet-style.