The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewEamonn Fingleton Archive
The Story In Japan Is Not That Blacks Are Excluded But That Truth Has Been Swept Under the Carpet
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The other day the New York Times highlighted anti-black discrimination in Japan. Focusing on the experiences of Ariana Miyamoto, a half-black/half-Japanese beauty queen who was born in Japan and enjoys full Japanese citizenship, the Timespresented a troubling and convincing account of a degree of explicit racial discrimination long unthinkable in respectable circles in the United States.

The story rang true – so far as it went. But a larger and more revealing story lay unexplored just below the surface: the mystery of what happened to countless mixed-race children conceived during the U.S. Army’s occupation of Japan in the aftermath of World War II.

The occupation lasted from 1945 to 1952, which means that such children are now in their early to late sixties. Up to 40,000 GIs were based in Japan at any one time, about one-seventh of them blacks. Thus a reasonable guesstimate is that several thousand mixed-race children were born, many of them of part African-American heritage. But where are they now? Certainly not in Japan. It is a remarkable fact that though I lived 27 years there, I never came across a mixed-race person who might date from that era. Indeed – occupation or no occupation – Japan has remained what it has always been, one of the world’s most ethnically homogenous nations.

Why is this worth mentioning? The point is less that the Japanese people as individuals are exceptionally racially intolerant. Rather it is that the Japanese system, qua system, is programmed to maintain racial purity — and to do so while remaining under the radar of American criticism. Although there seems to be no publicly available record of what happened in the late 1940s and early 1950s, a reasonable inference is that the Japanese authorities found ways to move mixed-race children abroad, typically probably almost immediately they were born. Yet nothing of this was reported at the time or later. Even countless American academic researchers who pride themselves on their political correctness have steered clear of the subject. Probably advisedly so, if they want to remain in receipt of the Tokyo-controlled funding that suffuses the Japan studies field. (Even when funding comes from ostensibly American corporations, it typically comes from the Japanese subsidiaries of such corporations. Japanese executives, responding to Japanese bureaucratic “guidance,” determine where the money goes, and recipients who go too far in speaking truth to power find themselves quickly frozen out.)


Note as of June 24: This commentary has evoked an exceptionally vitriolic response. My critics suggest that among other things I have an agenda and that I know nothing about Japan. What is absent is any direct quotes to show I am wrong. Rather, straw-man arguments have been used in which statements have been attributed to me that I never made. My point stands: the fate of thousands of babies conceived during the occupation has been swept under the rug. American scholars, correspondents, and other Japan watchers have evidently concluded that in this matter, as in so many other aspects of Japanology, discretion is the better part of valor.

(Republished from Forbes by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Economics • Tags: Japan 
Hide 2 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. In his book on Japan, American Renaissance Jared Taylor dealt in part with this subject. He seemed to suggest that many if not most of the mixed-race babies were exported (rather forcibly) abroad to Brazil in particular, due to Brazil having a rather large Japanese-Brazilian population. It was also speculated that in Brazil the offspring could easier “blend” in so to speak and that multi-ethnic Brazil wouldn’t bat an eyelid of these mixed race offspring.

    Also do keep in mind that its much easier to remove the shame (the offspring are the direct result of US occupation and thus a constant visible reminder of Japan’s losing WW2) from plain sight than having to deal with it on a constant daily basis.

    A bit surprised that this possibility, namely, that the offspring of the US occupied forces were relocated Brazil never seemed to occur to the author. I’d suggest that he go back and re-read Mr. Taylor’s book on Japan.

    In point of fact, Mr. Taylor devotes a near entire chapter to this very point (about offspring from mixed races and also of how foreigners in general are treated in Japan from a long term perspective).

    Keep in mind that this subject isn’t new: Taylor’s book on Japan was written over thirty years ago.

  2. do you blame the Japanese?

    I frankly find the cosmopolitan liberal position on race to be disgusting, bigoted and intolerant. If Japanese want to remain Japanese, who are we to force them to do otherwise?

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Eamonn Fingleton Comments via RSS
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.