The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / On "Political Correctness"
 All Comments / On "Political Correctness"
    David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • I just finished the book today–well okay, I have one chapter left.

    There is a bit of legerdemain going on in the author’s summary of his own arguments. As the Derb points out, the word “mixture” is used a lot, but taken out of context, this is deceptive. And the reviews published in the left wing press do deceive in just this manner.

    Reich is talking about mixtures of groups of people. Todays populations are being spoken of as Sets made up of numerous Subsets. Those Subsets themselves are treated as Sets in their own right, which means they have an identity. Having an identity presupposes both a center of gravity and a perimeter. So the “races” today are not really mixtures in the sense that they are made up of a well-stirred jumble of randomly selected individual bits, which is the impression given by left wing reviews. The Subsets which have combined to create today’s Sets had, themselves, a coherent identity in their own right; they too were Sets.

    What Reich ignores is the issue of why humans tend to group themselves into these coherent Sets. His math demonstrates that they do and I understand that he feels no need to go beyond that, but then by the same coin, he should lay off the moralizing and desist from warning us of the need to avoid hasty generalizations. Either he should take it head on or he should leave it alone. That’s the dishonesty in the book.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • @Lin
    "This uses GDP PPP in current dollars. It has its flaws when comparing a developed country to a developing one, but not between developing countries. It gets out of the exchange rate issue..."
    ..............
    First of all using 'number of years' to describe the GDP difference is semi-nonsense. Its like saying the boob size difference of a 12 years old girl and a 22 years old young woman is 'only 10 years'.
    PPPee GDP only make sense when comparing 2 countries with similar level of econ development and consumption pattern, like between Canada and USA. I'm no conspiracist, but its my opinion that PPPee GDP has 2 purposes: 1)to make people in poor countries to feel less poor, ie less agitated 2)To inflate the military expenditure of china and Russia so the US MIC can justify to increase their spendings.
    ...........
    1)China and India are not at the same development level.
    2)As someone(you?) said one can hire a domestic servant in india at US$80/month and Chinese domestic maids cost 6 to 8 times as much but much fewer Chinese households have servants(rural migrants can find factory or construction jobs) but instead Chinese households have more(and cheaper)washing machines, vacuum cleaners, air-conditioners...
    (Chinese electricity generation, with extra 5 % transmission loss, is about 4.5 times that of india,with extra19% transmission loss. Chinese steel and motor vehicles(with 4 wheels or more)production are about 7-8 times that of india...)
    ...............
    I'm actually sympathetic to indian uneasiness regarding their state of econ development; after all china is still as poor as Mexico or Brazil but I hate to say this:
    PPPee GDP is like a padded bra to a less endowed woman: It makes her feel 'bigger' and better

    You didn’t understand my comment at all. Fail.

    Depicting that table is extremely informative in indicating how far behind India is vs. China. It is about 10 years behind (give or take a bit). You can take per capita too, but as their population sizes are now nearly identical, the effect is the same as taking the total size of the economy.

    Click on the link so that you can understand the table.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • @Che Guava
    Mixing with Bushmen seems a good explanation for giant bums on so many black women.

    Overeating probably doesn't help (or does, since a giant bum is seen as desirable by many black men).

    I compare giant arses on obese women of European, African, and east Asian descent, my mental term is 'bench arse'. If you were sitting opposite, you could use it as a chair. The Africans are way on top. I am convinced that this is from earlier intermixing with Bushmen women, and similar types that were wiped out by the Bantu invasion from the north.then selection for huge bums.

    With European women, bench arse tends to coincide with the combo of obesity and same-sex attraction. Otherwise rare, even among the obese.

    I am friends with three or so women who are quite obese in my life, so east Asian, but they do not have bums one may see and think of 'possible seating'.

    Of course, actually sitting on a bench arse without permission would cause great offence and trouble,

    Hating to even mention the name, but does anybody *not* think that Kim Kardassian had implants to make a giant bum for Kanye West? I pay little attentinn to such garbage , but it is seeming obvious from photos.

    Kim’s “bench bum”?

    The old phrase was “five and a half axe handles wide”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Thanks, Derby.
    Of course, you’re spot on. Burn that book! All science is science until new discoveries prove that the previous science was, in fact, pseudoscience, virtu-signaled drivel. The LEFTIST science is erroneously based politics and its filthy, grubbyhand has been putted, exposed for just what it is…Rothschild NWO Poppycock.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Seamus Day

    Germans feared Jews because they were ‘too smart’.
     
    Name one Jew you can mention in the same sentence as Kepler, Leibniz, Gödel, Frege, Weierstrass, Heisenberg, Riemann, Hilbert, Planck.

    Oh, yeah, Emmy Nother and the intellectual middleman, Albert Einstein, who borrowed from the relativity theory of Poincare and Lorentz and added slight amplifications. But hey, when you control the narrative Einstein is the greatest thinker in history and Maya Angelou is the greatest writer and poet.

    Agree.

    It may be just my interpretation, but I get the impression that physicists themselves express less adulation for Einstein than does the general(ly misled) public.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Mad World An increasingly common cliché these days is that America is mired in the midst of its own Cultural Revolution. One of the most fascinatingly telling incidents to this effect occurred in a library at the University of Washington around January 2017, shortly after Trump had delivered his inauguration speech.[1] Various protestors stormed what...
  • @James Forrestal
    You're merely repeating (at greater, yet more ignorant, length) your original nonsensical "argument." Clearly, you lack even the minimal reasoning ability required to comprehend its internal inconsistency -- or perhaps have somehow convinced yourself that you can make up for it by doubling down on your dogmatic, ignorant, hate-filled race denialism. Sad.

    Your basic argument is the same, despite its meaningless rhetorical flourishes. Part of it seems to be the typically Far Left inability to distinguish between normative and positive statements; and of course part of it stems from your (wholly misplaced) confidence in your own "intelligence" and "morality."

    "you think I am making an argument specifically against the west (typical WN victimization complex), when its obvious that I am making an abstract moral argument...bla bla bla more pilpul and sophistry at greater and more pointless length"

    1. At whom is your argument directed, hmm? Do you understand what the term "deliberately disingenuous" means? I thought not.

    2. So you support open borders for China? India? Israel?

    3. You seem remarkably determined to maintain your "abstract moral argument" in such a rarefied state of abstraction that it is entirely free-floating, and not grounded in anything even approaching empirical support. This sort of worthless, transparently-false imitation of actual logical argumentation is typical of the Far Left (and of a certain ethnic group, of course).

    Repeating your initial misconceptions, only at greater length, and with more emotional incontinence, while ignoring my (very basic) point, does nothing to legitimize your "argument." You're shadowboxing here -- engaging with the demons of your fervid imagination, rather than the arguments right in front of you. Again, this is typical of the Far Left; they fail to comprehend the Right's actual arguments (which they have no answer for, anyway), and choose instead to engage with the caricatures of those arguments that their teevees spoon-feed to them. Sad.

    Again -- all races/ peoples/ cultures expand/ settle / invade when they get the chance. This is an (obviously true) observation about the real world, not a moral judgment. I have no "moral obligation" to accept your pathetic attempts to push White guilt on me. I'm merely noting that you would never attempt to push Turk guilt on the Turks, or North African guilt on the descendants of the Barbary pirates, or Jew guilt on those responsible for the Bolshevik revolution Everyone has the right to self-defense. Of course, your rabid, unreasoning anti-White hatred leads you to convince yourself that somehow every other race does, but Whites do not.

    But keep on rationalizing your hatred, at even greater length. Go right ahead. It's clear that the process somehow paradoxically raises your badly misplaced sense of your own virtuousness to even greater heights. Have fun.

    Again — all races/ peoples/ cultures expand/ settle / invade when they get the chance. This is an (obviously true) observation about the real world, not a moral judgment. I have no “moral obligation” to accept your pathetic attempts to push White guilt on me. I’m merely noting that you would never attempt to push Turk guilt on the Turks, or North African guilt on the descendants of the Barbary pirates, or Jew guilt on those responsible for the Bolshevik revolution Everyone has the right to self-defense. Of course, your rabid, unreasoning anti-White hatred leads you to convince yourself that somehow every other race does, but Whites do not.

    Not necessarily. What you’re saying is patently untrue. If this was true, then why did the ming dynasty willingly destroy their (massive) fleet and then voluntarily close their borders to the outside world? They had the chance to expand and settle, but they chose not to. Not all cultures value expansion and colonialism as much as the west does. The ming dynasty is only one example; I’m sure there are plenty of other examples where others cultures had the opportunity to expand/invade but instead chose not to. You are only pushing this erroneous line of reasoning because it is convenient for you and it exonerates the west; however its a piece of reasoning that doesn’t hold up so well when put to the test. You need to understand, not every culture is as warlike, domineering and expansive as western european culture is; different cultures simply have different prerogatives.

    White nationalists always want to brag about how intrepid, brave and adventurous white people are compared to other races; well…with that kind of mindset, global colonization is what you get. White nationalists always want to brag about how unique and different white people are when it comes to anything positive about white people, but then all the sudden whenever anything negative comes up white nationalists always try to backtrack and act as if everybody possesses equal capacity for doing bad things. That’s pretty disingenuous if you ask me

    Also I find it funny that you want to claim the law of the jungle with regards to the ubiquity of colonialism and how that precludes any kind of universal moral judgment being passed against it, yet in the same paragraph you suddenly want to talk about how everyone has the right to self defense. So basically you are trying to imply that universal notions of morality do not exist when it comes to colonization, but then suddenly universal notions of morality exist when it comes to self defense IE cultural preservation? If according to you my assertion that colonialism is immoral is baseless, then just what are you basing your own idea of universal right to self defense on? You’re basically trying to selectively enforce morality at this point, and you only talk about “rights” when it benefits you, instead of being morally consistent and applying notions of morality equally no matter what.

    The turks, north africans or jews were not the primary topic of discussion in this particular conversation; hence that is why nobody discusses their culpability or blame. If we were specifically discussing the turks, north africans or jews within that sort of context then I would have no problem objectively discussing their potential culpability. We are discussing the culpability of the west with regards to colonization because it is tangential, not because of any personal biases. That being said, I am personally biased against hypocrites, but this is a bias that transcends race and color lines.

    But keep on rationalizing your hatred, at even greater length. Go right ahead. It’s clear that the process somehow paradoxically raises your badly misplaced sense of your own virtuousness to even greater heights. Have fun.

    Not really, Im as cool as a cucumber. And yes, I am having fun dissecting your arguments and verbally jousting with you

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @James Forrestal
    You're merely repeating (at greater, yet more ignorant, length) your original nonsensical "argument." Clearly, you lack even the minimal reasoning ability required to comprehend its internal inconsistency -- or perhaps have somehow convinced yourself that you can make up for it by doubling down on your dogmatic, ignorant, hate-filled race denialism. Sad.

    Your basic argument is the same, despite its meaningless rhetorical flourishes. Part of it seems to be the typically Far Left inability to distinguish between normative and positive statements; and of course part of it stems from your (wholly misplaced) confidence in your own "intelligence" and "morality."

    "you think I am making an argument specifically against the west (typical WN victimization complex), when its obvious that I am making an abstract moral argument...bla bla bla more pilpul and sophistry at greater and more pointless length"

    1. At whom is your argument directed, hmm? Do you understand what the term "deliberately disingenuous" means? I thought not.

    2. So you support open borders for China? India? Israel?

    3. You seem remarkably determined to maintain your "abstract moral argument" in such a rarefied state of abstraction that it is entirely free-floating, and not grounded in anything even approaching empirical support. This sort of worthless, transparently-false imitation of actual logical argumentation is typical of the Far Left (and of a certain ethnic group, of course).

    Repeating your initial misconceptions, only at greater length, and with more emotional incontinence, while ignoring my (very basic) point, does nothing to legitimize your "argument." You're shadowboxing here -- engaging with the demons of your fervid imagination, rather than the arguments right in front of you. Again, this is typical of the Far Left; they fail to comprehend the Right's actual arguments (which they have no answer for, anyway), and choose instead to engage with the caricatures of those arguments that their teevees spoon-feed to them. Sad.

    Again -- all races/ peoples/ cultures expand/ settle / invade when they get the chance. This is an (obviously true) observation about the real world, not a moral judgment. I have no "moral obligation" to accept your pathetic attempts to push White guilt on me. I'm merely noting that you would never attempt to push Turk guilt on the Turks, or North African guilt on the descendants of the Barbary pirates, or Jew guilt on those responsible for the Bolshevik revolution Everyone has the right to self-defense. Of course, your rabid, unreasoning anti-White hatred leads you to convince yourself that somehow every other race does, but Whites do not.

    But keep on rationalizing your hatred, at even greater length. Go right ahead. It's clear that the process somehow paradoxically raises your badly misplaced sense of your own virtuousness to even greater heights. Have fun.

    You’re merely repeating (at greater, yet more ignorant, length) your original nonsensical “argument.” Clearly, you lack even the minimal reasoning ability required to comprehend its internal inconsistency — or perhaps have somehow convinced yourself that you can make up for it by doubling down on your dogmatic, ignorant, hate-filled race denialism. Sad.

    Wrong. Just because you claim that my arguments are wrong, does not make them wrong. I suspect you know this too, and that’s why you avoid digging too deep into the actual substance of my arguments and instead prefer to flit around the edges and try to throw out non-sequitur responses

    Your basic argument is the same, despite its meaningless rhetorical flourishes. Part of it seems to be the typically Far Left inability to distinguish between normative and positive statements; and of course part of it stems from your (wholly misplaced) confidence in your own “intelligence” and “morality.”

    Instead of simply flinging accusations; please clearly show why my rhetoric is meaningless instead of merely claiming that it is meaningless. You are trying to accuse me of being unable to distinguish between normative and positive statements because you are either unable to or unwilling to discuss the merits of my arguments themselves. I stand behind my arguments and have no problem discussing their merits with you.

    “you think I am making an argument specifically against the west (typical WN victimization complex), when its obvious that I am making an abstract moral argument…bla bla bla more pilpul and sophistry at greater and more pointless length”

    1. At whom is your argument directed, hmm? Do you understand what the term “deliberately disingenuous” means? I thought not.

    Its pretty obvious that I’m making an abstract moral argument. You just use the terms pilpul (your favorite word) and sophistry in order to try to ad hom my argument instead of actually discussing it:

    Your low comprehension abilities has made it so that you think I am making an argument specifically against the west (typical WN victimization complex), when its obvious that I am making an abstract moral argument which incidentally involves the west. My point entirely revolves around the importance of moral consistency. Alt-righters/WN who insist on being proud of the west’s extensive colonial history while simultaneously crying about how unfair mass immigration is are no different than a serial thief who complains about other people stealing from him. This is a very simple point, I don’t understand how you continue to misunderstand this. Your response trying to debunk this was completely off the mark since you didn’t understand the argument that was being made in the first place.

    The point I made is very clear. There is hardly any ambiguity here; and any people that are reading our exchange can clearly see what I wrote as well. If you choose to embrace moral consistency or reject it, its up to you; but that doesnt change the validity of my point. Do you realize how ridiculous it looks when alt-righters/WN condone the west’s centuries of violent conquests and destruction of other races and cultures but then turn around and preach about the sanctity of racial/cultural preservation and how every race deserves a homeland? That is called hypocrisy my friend. You are perfectly free to disregard my call for greater moral consistency on the far-right; but its at your own peril not mine.

    2. So you support open borders for China? India? Israel?

    If china, india or israel had colonized the entire world (in the process destroying countless cultures and indigenous peoples) just so that they could exploit the land for their own benefit then yes, I would not feel bad seeing these countries end up having to deal with the unexpected/unforeseen consequence of their immoral actions. That being said, I have never advocated open borders, rather I only made the neutral observation that the west is being unexpectedly haunted by its colonial past. I don’t think that anybody really debates the validity of this observation. Even you don’t debate it, that’s why you continue to tiptoe around it instead of taking that argument head on. Anyways, you seem to have this odd notion that I am only applying my logic to the west when really I hold everyone to these same standards. If any culture/civilization/etc decides to act in an immoral fashion and then ends up getting screwed over because of it later on, then they fully deserve what happens to them. I don’t care if they’re white, black, yellow etc etc.

    3. You seem remarkably determined to maintain your “abstract moral argument” in such a rarefied state of abstraction that it is entirely free-floating, and not grounded in anything even approaching empirical support. This sort of worthless, transparently-false imitation of actual logical argumentation is typical of the Far Left (and of a certain ethnic group, of course).

    Repeating your initial misconceptions, only at greater length, and with more emotional incontinence, while ignoring my (very basic) point, does nothing to legitimize your “argument.” You’re shadowboxing here — engaging with the demons of your fervid imagination, rather than the arguments right in front of you. Again, this is typical of the Far Left; they fail to comprehend the Right’s actual arguments (which they have no answer for, anyway), and choose instead to engage with the caricatures of those arguments that their teevees spoon-feed to them. Sad.

    You accuse me of pilpul and making empty arguments, but isn’t this exactly what you’re doing? I’m imploring you to discuss the topic itself, but you seem to be fixated on arguing about how I am arguing instead.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • @iffen

    You bet there is variation in the distribution, but how that interacts with environment or whether said distribution makes humans of this or that more successful is highly dependent on the definition and purpose of success.
     
    Couldn't agree more. It is up to the individual to decide if he prefers subsistence farming over modern technological economies and to make a determination as to which is "better."

    BTW, you keep going on and on about superiority and hierarchy and I haven't mention that at all.

    Trying to link IQ to farming and its ubiquitous environmental randomness (chaos theory here) is like guessing which child will grow to engage in same sex behavior.

    Uhhh no but I have.

    Laughing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • “This uses GDP PPP in current dollars. It has its flaws when comparing a developed country to a developing one, but not between developing countries. It gets out of the exchange rate issue…”
    …………..
    First of all using ‘number of years’ to describe the GDP difference is semi-nonsense. Its like saying the boob size difference of a 12 years old girl and a 22 years old young woman is ‘only 10 years’.
    PPPee GDP only make sense when comparing 2 countries with similar level of econ development and consumption pattern, like between Canada and USA. I’m no conspiracist, but its my opinion that PPPee GDP has 2 purposes: 1)to make people in poor countries to feel less poor, ie less agitated 2)To inflate the military expenditure of china and Russia so the US MIC can justify to increase their spendings.
    ………..
    1)China and India are not at the same development level.
    2)As someone(you?) said one can hire a domestic servant in india at US$80/month and Chinese domestic maids cost 6 to 8 times as much but much fewer Chinese households have servants(rural migrants can find factory or construction jobs) but instead Chinese households have more(and cheaper)washing machines, vacuum cleaners, air-conditioners…
    (Chinese electricity generation, with extra 5 % transmission loss, is about 4.5 times that of india,with extra19% transmission loss. Chinese steel and motor vehicles(with 4 wheels or more)production are about 7-8 times that of india…)
    ……………
    I’m actually sympathetic to indian uneasiness regarding their state of econ development; after all china is still as poor as Mexico or Brazil but I hate to say this:
    PPPee GDP is like a padded bra to a less endowed woman: It makes her feel ‘bigger’ and better

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm
    You didn't understand my comment at all. Fail.

    Depicting that table is extremely informative in indicating how far behind India is vs. China. It is about 10 years behind (give or take a bit). You can take per capita too, but as their population sizes are now nearly identical, the effect is the same as taking the total size of the economy.

    Click on the link so that you can understand the table.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • @iffen
    Power is not by definition linked to IQ.

    Correct. Do you know what is linked to IQ? Chances for successful life outcomes in the modern world.

    But power historically outpaces IQ for being successful. So IQ is limited as per the descriptors I referenced. That’s the point, our world demonstrates that power is primary, and IQ contends to demonstrate superiority make the case.

    But this far, the people with high IQ’s claiming success demonstrate a peculiar definition of success as I referenced.

    Furthermore people around the globe with median or even below average IQ’s are very successful, especially if success is not measured by IQ. Problem solving, relational dynamics, work ethic, productivity, are also more important than IQ.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @EliteCommInc.
    Hence one od the many categorical debates about the meaning of race.


    Human kind is all of one species -- one race categorize into various racial groups. There are no subspecies of humans -- there are categorical distinctions based on constructs as decided by and among various groups of humans.

    The social playground of the term race in no manner changes a single reality, despite different shapes, sizes, colors and practices -- humans begat humans and will continue to beget humans, regardless of shape, size, practice or skin color.

    Humankind a race of beings who tower babble our way through rhetorical discourse about who we are and on occasion about which one of us is superior.

    Hey ma . . . watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat.

    Human kind is all of one species — one race categorize into various racial groups. There are no subspecies of humans — there are categorical distinctions based on constructs as decided by and among various groups of humans.

    There are no subspecies of animals – there are categorical distinctions based on constructs as decided by and among various groups of animals. Polar Bears and Grizzly bears are really the same subspecies, but the Polar bears are bear surpremist and who wish to kill and oppress the Grizzy bears who dindu nothin’

    The social playground of the term race in no manner changes a single reality, despite different shapes, sizes, colors and practices — humans begat humans and will continue to beget humans, regardless of shape, size, practice or skin color.

    So…different groups of humans evolved to have different size, shapes, and skin color but have the same brains. How is this possible?

    Humankind a race of beings who tower babble our way through rhetorical discourse about who we are and on occasion about which one of us is superior.

    HBD is not about superiority, it’s about scientific reality. You could understand that if you won’t so insecure.

    Hey ma . . . watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat.

    Sooner this than provide evidence for race denial.

    There are many at Unz who use syntax and diction to sound much more intelligent than they actually are – they all do it better than you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @Anon
    Churchill of Marlborough was a snake. A remarkably talented snake, but still a snake.

    Churchill of Marlborough was a snake. A remarkably talented snake, but still a snake.

    Agreed. Treachery seemed to run in the Churchill family.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • (Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)

    Considering it’s been near-impossible to get their homepage to appear the last few days, I’m certainly glad they got that permission!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • An "aging white population [is] speeding [up] diversity," blared a headline in The Hill. Could this be a case of confusing cause-and-effect? Are the two trends—whites dying-out and minorities thriving—really spontaneous and strictly parallel? The reverse is likely true. Corrected, The Hill headline should have read: Could speeding up diversity contribute to a decline in...
  • @Renoman
    I think it's mostly economic. As people become more wealthy they see better ways to entertain themselves than kids. Raising kids is a long dirty often thankless unsatisfying job. I grant you it has it's moments but in a realistic analysis it's a non starter.

    Utterly disagree. I hope you’re not a parent, unless you managed to hide your terrible view of your children from them.

    And if anyone thinks that raising children is or should be substantially about “entertaining” the parents, GROW UP.

    Without these children, my wife and I would have enough money to travel far abroad every year, and eventually see dozens more countries than we will in our actual life. We wouldn’t trade our kids for that superior “entertainment” for a minute.

    “Realistically”, raising children has been the most satisfying thing I’ve ever done. And we’re doing it in a place that is not financially or culturally conducive to raising a decent-sized traditional family, Los Angeles.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @SunBakedSuburb
    " ... whites have every liberty to form their own groups. "

    Not really. If a group of whites publicly professed in-group preference and wanted to coalesce around identitarian issues, white sjw Stalinists would move quickly, primarily on social media, to stigmatize such a group. Especially if said group was more serious than Richard Spencer's cavalcade of gay Nazi camp.

    "Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture."

    I will assume you're being sincere: Apparently, you don't follow trends. The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint or be doxxed, which will be followed by economic marginalization.

    “If a group of whites publicly professed in-group preference and wanted to coalesce around identitarian issues, white sjw Stalinists would move quickly, primarily on social media, to stigmatize such a group.”

    Yet, despite SJW machinations, those whites have the freedom to form their own in-group. It doesn’t mean they are free from outside pressure. Besides, any group is “stigmatized” by their ideological opponents, so that argument goes out the door.

    “Especially if said group was more serious than Richard Spencer’s cavalcade of gay Nazi camp.”

    Spencer’s group is indeed serious. See, you just stigmatized his merry band, yet they still remain steadfast in their desire to gain footing in their community.

    “Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture.”

    “I will assume you’re being sincere: Apparently, you don’t follow trends.”

    The trend is that the Coalition of the Fringes, Right and Left, write a narrative that normies find over-the-top.

    “The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint or be doxxed, which will be followed by economic marginalization.”

    A societal mantra as dictated by radical white liberals, not whites in general. In similar fashion, the Alt Right demands that whites accept “race realism”, lest they be labeled “race traitors” and summarily labeled as “enemies”.

    Works both ways here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • @Lin
    That's interesting---"On most metrics, India is 6-25 years behind China, depending on the metric. Taking a composite, the consensus is about 10-11 years behind."
    I think that depends on whose "10-11 years "...Chinese "10-11 years" or indian "10-11 years".
    .................
    Some stats: Chinese GDP in 1999=0.99 US$trillion increased to US$10trillion in2014---within 15 years

    2014 figs.( http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201502/t20150226_685799.html )

    "全年国内生产总值[5]636463亿元.."..."全年人民币平均汇率为1美元兑6.1428元人民币.."

    1999 figs(http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/ndtjgb/qgndtjgb/200203/t20020331_30013.html)

    "1999年国内生产总值为82054亿元.."..."年末汇率8.2793元人民币兑1美元..."

    the 10 folds (nominal in US$) increase was due to very fast growth, inflation, exchange rate appreciation, and 2 GDP calculation adjustments,if I remember right at 16.7% and 6.7%

    A simpler way to compare :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_and_projected_GDP_(PPP)#Country_club_trillions

    This uses GDP PPP in current dollars. It has its flaws when comparing a developed country to a developing one, but not between developing countries. It gets out of the exchange rate issue.

    $5 Trillion crossed :
    USA : 1988
    China : 2003
    India : 2010

    $10 Trillion crossed :
    USA : 2000
    China : 2008
    India : 2018

    $20 Trillion crossed or to be crossed:
    China : 2016
    USA : 2018
    India : 2026 (estimate)

    Since inflation has been so low in US$, current and constant don’t differ much.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • That’s interesting—”On most metrics, India is 6-25 years behind China, depending on the metric. Taking a composite, the consensus is about 10-11 years behind.”
    I think that depends on whose “10-11 years “…Chinese “10-11 years” or indian “10-11 years”.
    ……………..
    Some stats: Chinese GDP in 1999=0.99 US$trillion increased to US$10trillion in2014—within 15 years

    2014 figs.( http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201502/t20150226_685799.html )

    “全年国内生产总值[5]636463亿元..”…”全年人民币平均汇率为1美元兑6.1428元人民币..”

    1999 figs(http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/ndtjgb/qgndtjgb/200203/t20020331_30013.html)

    “1999年国内生产总值为82054亿元..”…”年末汇率8.2793元人民币兑1美元…”

    the 10 folds (nominal in US$) increase was due to very fast growth, inflation, exchange rate appreciation, and 2 GDP calculation adjustments,if I remember right at 16.7% and 6.7%

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm
    A simpler way to compare :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_and_projected_GDP_(PPP)#Country_club_trillions

    This uses GDP PPP in current dollars. It has its flaws when comparing a developed country to a developing one, but not between developing countries. It gets out of the exchange rate issue.

    $5 Trillion crossed :
    USA : 1988
    China : 2003
    India : 2010

    $10 Trillion crossed :
    USA : 2000
    China : 2008
    India : 2018

    $20 Trillion crossed or to be crossed:
    China : 2016
    USA : 2018
    India : 2026 (estimate)

    Since inflation has been so low in US$, current and constant don't differ much.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • An "aging white population [is] speeding [up] diversity," blared a headline in The Hill. Could this be a case of confusing cause-and-effect? Are the two trends—whites dying-out and minorities thriving—really spontaneous and strictly parallel? The reverse is likely true. Corrected, The Hill headline should have read: Could speeding up diversity contribute to a decline in...
  • MOST WHITES DO NOT WANT TO HAVE CHILDREN–PERIOD.

    I am totally against 3rd world immigration, but to say that “diversity” is driving white decline is far fetched. At present, there is no law that stops white people from marrying early and having many kids. The fact is, most of them don’t want to.

    Stats prove that white women are having white children at a rate that is way below even replacement levels, compared to other ethnicities which are increasing in population. Look at some famous conservatives:

    Pat Buchanan—only one daughter.
    Rush Limbaugh—many wives, zero kids.

    There are plenty of jobs and many colleges left for white people.

    Whites would rather have fun—smoke, drink, do drugs and date and have fun with 10 different women. By the time they are ready to “settle down”, it is too late, as fertility peaks in the early 20’s and then declines. Like taking a new car for a test drive for 10 years—it is an old used car by the time you are ready to buy it.

    We have met the enemy—and the enemy is us.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • @EliteCommInc.
    one Shorter perspective of the several I posit:

    version -- mistaking muscle power for IQ is the history of European practice. During WWI, africans trained by the French were ensconced in a small french village. The villagers gradually accepted the Africans as they sought to supplement their incomes by engaging community projects and odd kibs. Initially, it was thought the africans simpletons, they spoke a very basic crude french. But eventually one women discovered that the africans had in fact been taught only rudimentary french. She took it upon herself to offer the africans the french as it was intended as language and lo and behold discovered that the blacks were in fact as sophisticated a people as those in the village and they adopted general french linguistics which they mastered as well or better than many french themselves.

    It was uncovered that the french deliberately denied teaching the language in full so as to maintain a superior status. The US refused to permit black US troops to fight along side their US brothers in arms. They assigned them to the French, who discovers that the blacks were as sophisticated humans as themselves. equal to or superior in bravery. And when they began awarding blacks medals for the same, the US military demanded they refrain from doing so -- l'est they begin seeing themselves as equals.


    It is deeply embarrassing to visit a plantation only discover the unacknowledged technology that blacks brought to building technique (s), purposefulness and architectural design. It is the uncovering of the manipulation on mass scale that whites in power - have engaged to delimit knowledge about the intelligence of others. To ignore that is to miss the dilemma concerning the distribution of IQ.


    Power is not by definition linked to IQ.

    Power is not by definition linked to IQ.

    Correct. Do you know what is linked to IQ? Chances for successful life outcomes in the modern world.

    Read More
    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    But power historically outpaces IQ for being successful. So IQ is limited as per the descriptors I referenced. That's the point, our world demonstrates that power is primary, and IQ contends to demonstrate superiority make the case.

    But this far, the people with high IQ's claiming success demonstrate a peculiar definition of success as I referenced.

    Furthermore people around the globe with median or even below average IQ's are very successful, especially if success is not measured by IQ. Problem solving, relational dynamics, work ethic, productivity, are also more important than IQ.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @EliteCommInc.
    The peoples on the America's survived successfully before Europeans arrived. In fact they have managed to exist successfully in spite of Europeans. The people's on the Continent have survived and son so successfully longer than the Europeans. And they both survived in periods of drought, famine, warfare, flood, earthquake, etc. And have thrived in spite of it all. They managed to develop waterways, plumbing, roads, technology without destroying the environments they thrived in.

    I think what we are beginning to understand about IQ as defined by the European mind is that it is predicated on need and desire (desire from idleness). On neither continent did the people's needs vast arrays of vaccines, though people in Africa had as practice vaccinations before encountering Europeans. On neither continent did the people's engage in killing their environments for sport as to demonstrate superiority. A practice that has thrown nearly every -- well every environment out of balance that Europeans came into contact with.

    Perhaps, the construct of IQ demonstrates the every present insecurity that Europeans are constantly trying to outrun. The incessant desire to demonstrate superiority. And yet history tells us that to be successful, one need not be superior in any manner. Perhaps, the obsession with IQ to demonstrate superiority -- is but the insecurity of a child constantly having to prove itself to the point of exhaustion. One considers the genius of national parks. When considering why they were created, one must consider how such an obvious composition could have been an oversight in developing cities in the first place.

    One considers the circular rhetorical dynamic, Europeans develop solutions to more problems that they themselves create than the environment demands they create to overcome. Perhaps that is why so many of the indigenous populations look at our heritage as one full of reckless energy that we install as intelligence. And no greater example as that of the Europeans willingness to utterly destroy for the sake of acknowledging superior status as opposed to being a success on the planet. Wiping out the buffalo/bison for profit did not end the native american populations.

    Importing immigrants is not going to save the US republic and one would think people with a successful IQ would learn that lesson from obvious hard core realities of history. Yet the people touting superior intelligence are the advocates of destructive social policies and claiming to be superior humans.


    You bet there is variation in the distribution, but how that interacts with environment or whether said distribution makes humans of this or that more successful is highly dependent on the definition and purpose of success.

    The Jellyfish it is said has successfully exists longer than humans --- as have whales, and even monkey's whether they have the ability to successfully survive humans is predicated on their ability to survive are destructive nature of the few who seem incapable of living without destroying to demonstrate their superior quality.

    You bet there is variation in the distribution, but how that interacts with environment or whether said distribution makes humans of this or that more successful is highly dependent on the definition and purpose of success.

    Couldn’t agree more. It is up to the individual to decide if he prefers subsistence farming over modern technological economies and to make a determination as to which is “better.”

    BTW, you keep going on and on about superiority and hierarchy and I haven’t mention that at all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    Trying to link IQ to farming and its ubiquitous environmental randomness (chaos theory here) is like guessing which child will grow to engage in same sex behavior.



    Uhhh no but I have.

    Laughing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @EliteCommInc.
    "That’s because of regional differences in the human genome. Like any widely-distributed species, ours has developed regional varieties due to local inbreeding under well-understood genetic rules: founder effect, genetic drift, natural selection. The simplest name for these varieties—the one favored by Charles Darwin, the father of modern biology—is “races.”

    But we now know that it was an incorrect term and convolutes the meaning of what it means to be a human being. One can dress the matter up in all kinds intellectual and even valid scientific garb. The reality genetically is that we are all of one race -- human race. The issue is not all that complex.

    And withing the human race there are variation in the biological, social and intellectual, emotional existence and expression of the same. All of which has been shaped over millions of years by environmental actors static and nonstatic. That Darwin and others used race to make distinctions of human hierarchy of most to least human is an issue we have inherited and are now wrestling with. It is untruthful to claim that the academic community are race denialists, though I suspect that some are.

    The issue surrounds, the meaning of the variations and for whites in particular, the suggestion that they are not in fact at the top of the pyramid via genetics. And by challenging that standard exported throughout the world and enforced with great vigor -- a lot of white people are just scared. And many in some manner of panic are racing, no pun intended, though I suppose it works, to solidify their superior status in science.

    When the issue of race is discussed, in modernity, we are not talking about genetics, we are generally discussion its social construction of meaning. And while it is convenient to hoola hoop the debate into one of science, it is a slight of hand gimmick, for the purpose of blurring the matters of question by ignoring the bridging.

    I won't ignore the bridging.

    ________________________________

    Your point . . . .

    "As we all know, a peculiar orthodoxy about human nature has come up among the Liberal Arts and Grievance Studies (LAGS) types who staff academic administrations, media, and government bureaucracies, including those that approve money grants to research scientists. A key tenet of this orthodoxy: There Is No Such Thing As Race. According to this tenet, race is a “social construct,” a sort of collective optical illusion.


    There is certainly a strange thing happening in and among academics. But the nexus of that discussion has nothing to do with race being real or not. Continuing to make that claim is to abuse the issue(s). The second aspect of the argument concerning "race" as a social construct, is not one of optical illusion save that the social implications of racial superiority has been premised on some faulty science and reasoning that on test don't play out for a myriad of reasons.


    But in all my life I have never met anyone who claimed genetics didn't matter to human existence in the real.

    Excellent points – thanks!

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Seamus Padraig

    The reality genetically is that we are all of one race — human race.
     
    Well, actually, no. Mankind (homo sapiens) is not a race, but a species. A race is a subspecies.

    A breed, if you will.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Henry's Cat
    What brand of anti-Darwinist are you?

    Read him before, Creationist

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • If the Alt Right is dead, why is the Main Stream Media still pumping out propaganda pieces on it? On April 6, the New York Times published Ryan Cooper’s review of the book ALT-RIGHT: From 4chan to the White House by BBC journalist Mike Wendling. (The black, white, and red color pattern on the cover...
  • Whoever it was that created the hugely successful (i.e., effective) “It’s Okay To Be White“ meme is, in my humble opinion, a sort of Michelangelo of Memes

    Actually the Martin Luther: the launch of IOTBW’s postering operation coincided with the 95 Theses quincentenary.

    Major sh!tposting against a moribund cathedral (or synagogue) doesn’t have to be complicated to be effective.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • @gustafus21
    Blacks also have an IQ 20-30 points below whites - causing young males to challenge the male dominance hierarchy as apex predators.

    FEED THE CHILDREN? -- NOT ON YOUR LIFE - then they breed like roaches and burst their borders.

    WHAT HAVE WE DONE? -- Sorry, but it is kill or be killed time, and not just in Europe. We could have left the Africans to perish in their own excrement... but CHRISTIANS... those idiots... kept proffering more cheeks.

    I root for Ebola. AIDS... anything to rid us of this plague

    Blacks also have an IQ 20-30 points below whites – causing young males to challenge the male dominance hierarchy as apex predators.

    Pray tell, what “study” confirmed this? Seems to me I’m black and I’m smarter than you.

    I root for Ebola. AIDS… anything to rid us of this plague

    Speaking of plagues, your ancestors were nearly wiped out because they weren’t smart enough to figure out that filth is deadly.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • @TT

    No sane leaders are so stupid to self destroy. ZUS is the driving force behind by hamstrung all the developed country leaders West or East. Jp & SK might be next.
     
    No contradiction sir. You should be clever enough to see that why smart leaders toe ZUS order to self destroyed own country: they are hamstrung / hold ransom with the 5eyes esponage with court abusing. Obey and prosperous, or get destroyed with leak secret / false accusation.

    Look at these few countries as examples:

    SK is now purging all ex-prez who resist ZUS & Thaad installation, starting from Prez Park 40yrs jail demand.

    Pak PM Shariff will be barred from running office forever by a corrupted Supreme court overwriting elected leaders.

    Mauritius Supreme court tried to rule over elected Prez, but get fired. Immediately India with ZUS backing military intervention, but stop by China.

    Brazil most popular leaders are now been impeached and jailed for unfounded bribery to block Brics, when the proven corrupted ones are pardon to take office without been elected as Prez.

    Thailand Thaksin & family openly defended Thais interest against ZUS & work with China, he is couped by Muslim general with ZUS blessing. Court prosecuted every of his successors with bribery who won election by above 70% vote.

    Jp Abe is now facing many leak scandals targeting his cabinet. If he still refuse to toe all ZUS instruction such as joint trade war to China, he will be destroyed.

    Sri Lanka Rajapradesh, Indonesia Ah Hock, Malaysia Najib, France, Germany,…long list. No one is spared, including all Potus, JFK, Trumps or Bill Clinton.

    Spore gov just expose a social society sponsored by George Soros Open Society & USAids to meddle social view(akar color revolution). The court is now filled with Indian judges at lightning speed. PM Lee signaled his wish to step down when no apparent heir at sight. Something is brewing for agreeing to be China Bri node & not joining anti-China in SCS.

    If Modi start getting too cosy with Xi as recent moves, he will be next.


    “The court is now filled with Indian judges at lightning speed. ”

    How is this even possible? Judiciary officials (of all people) always has to be recruited from full citizens, no? How can an “Indian judge” be allowed to preside over a Singapore court? That makes no sense.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @JohnnyWalker123
    You've said that the Zionists have chosen Indians to be their clerks. Can you elaborate on that?

    I don’t know what your day job is but if you’ve spent some time in tech (I mean on the field not as an HR or something; not that it is worthless but still) you’d have noticed that East Asians and East Europeans are usually highly dedicated and have a deep technical insight on average compared to Indians and the few WASPs who end up there. Apparently they know their stuff inside out. That is NOT to belittle the above average Indian or WASP but these are cold practical facts known throughout.

    Despite that, MOST middle management position is increasingly being handed down to Indians. If you think this is by accident then you are quite naive. Nothing happens by accident in the realm of ZOG. They won’t be handing out such companies like Google, Microsoft and Qualcomm to these Indians if it didn’t have the zionist stamp of approval. Remember when Broadcom tried to do a hostile takeover of Qualcomm, it was deemed a “security risk” and preZident Trump promptly blocked it. No business as usual in the “free market” apparently ;).

    And more and more of these Indians are now taking up law and becoming celebrated shysters, both corporate and civil. These were the steps our Juuish “friends” adopted when they were reining in the good ol’ USA before it became ZUS. Our Indian friends also have a similar desire to lord over us but they know the juuz have it for now. Perhaps they’ve come to the conclusion that it’s better to be second tier than to just be worker bees like the Chinese and the Koreans. And as far as the Eastern Europeans go, they better not be seen even outside the lawn of the WH.

    And there is also the pacific angle where ZUS is currently trying to reign in the dragon, the most obvious next global (economic) power. If you are Chinese you should worry more about the insidious (((globalist))) who is increasingly taking up finance in Hong Kong and marrying your women than Indians taking up roots in Singapore. Since they can’t obviously blackmail you guys to do their bidding using the old testament, they are breeding mongrels who will have divided loyalties and of course ISrael will come first for them as well. . The next fat juicy hog for these parasitical creatures happens to be China. Either ZUS will rein it in before it goes down or the mongrels start making inroads into Chinese society. Either way you’ve been “selected”. And getting India and Indians on-board helps immensely with that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha

    But they fear the Muslims Islam Jihadist, who believe their terrorism is God blessed with virgins awaiting
     
    I fear those guys too. You can talk sense into some of them, but many of them are too deep into the muck to be able to pull them out of. Muslims, by far are the majority targets of these people - so we know the problem far too well. Here are the names and stats of the number of people killed in attacks of the mausoleums of Sufi shaykhs in Pakistan:
    https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/interactive/2017/02/attack-shrines-pakistan-2005-170219181655660.html

    spreading their religion by multiplying with uncontrolled births
     
    Yeah, we have kids - that's a feature not a bug. People who convert to Islam also tend to have families with kids. Maybe you don't like kids - that's not our problem - feel free not to have any and encourage your friends not to have any.

    polygamy
     
    In some cultures it's common for people to have more than one wife - what business is it of yours if they aren't bothering you in their countries? They get to have more kids you get to make fun of them at cocktail parties with your unmarried friends; both sides benefit. Please, laugh it up at our expense:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dADXIdcbMpY

    I get it if it comes down to Muslims trying to have polygamous marriages in the West; simply make it illegal and enforce the law.

    Pls stop selling your Islam like Christian missionary.
     
    Sure, I'll knock it off if your name is Ron Unz - is it? Otherwise there is a button for "ignore commenter", please use it.

    Hi Talha. I always enjoy your comments, even when I don’t totally agree with you (though I generally do). You are courteous, upbeat, honest and patient. You set a very good example here. Nice work!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @SunBakedSuburb
    " ... whites have every liberty to form their own groups. "

    Not really. If a group of whites publicly professed in-group preference and wanted to coalesce around identitarian issues, white sjw Stalinists would move quickly, primarily on social media, to stigmatize such a group. Especially if said group was more serious than Richard Spencer's cavalcade of gay Nazi camp.

    "Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture."

    I will assume you're being sincere: Apparently, you don't follow trends. The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint or be doxxed, which will be followed by economic marginalization.

    The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint

    if you’re a Brit or Swede who thinks England or Sweden have a right to maintain their ethnic and/or cultural character, then from every orifice of the hive comes the screeching of ‘Nazis! and ‘white supremacists!!!!’

    “RACISTS!!!’

    if you’re a white American who thinks Affirmative Action is wrong and racist and unfair, well then brace yourself for the orgy of hatred and screeching, ‘white supremacists!!!’

    and it goes beyond race now even to include ‘hateful constructs of the patriarchy’; like gender.

    that it’s all prima facie insane, doesn’t get in the way of they’re screeching and hysterics.

    And even here on the Unz Review, there are people who would say that any desire of white Americans to maintain any shred of their (white = racist) culture or heritage, are nothing more than vile “white supremacists”, who must be hounded and harangued for the crime of not hating their own kind (with the kind of visceral, rancorous race-hatred that they hate white people with ; )

    We live in a surreal idiocracy, where the most preposterous idiocies are given credence as if they were anything but the gibbering’s of a drooling lunatic.

    All you have to do is realize they want what you have. White people have created amazing civilizations in Europe and N. America and elsewhere, and it’s only natural that everyone else would want such things for themselves. Duh.

    But where it gets beyond ludicrous/obnoxious is when they demand white people have no right to even exist. Which is their mantra today, because they aren’t laughed out of the room, as they obviously should be.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • @Beckow
    A big part of creating civilisation was realising that 'fast running and thug-like fighting' are not all that useful in a war. In Africa that didn't happen, so they were helpless. War is not a sport.

    This from people in the US who have thug lifed their way across the planet who are incapable of adhering to agreements they draft and force upon others. and are now mugging the middle east again . . .

    Next some genius will be spouting that the planet is over populated. And what the US needs is more immigrants to get rid of those .3% of violent blacks who want to take away white guns so when the apocalypse occurs — they can “get white people.”

    Good grief . . . superior analysis from IQ to superior morality has no end.

    Read More
    • LOL: Truth
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Seamus Padraig

    The reality genetically is that we are all of one race — human race.
     
    Well, actually, no. Mankind (homo sapiens) is not a race, but a species. A race is a subspecies.

    Hence one od the many categorical debates about the meaning of race.

    Human kind is all of one species — one race categorize into various racial groups. There are no subspecies of humans — there are categorical distinctions based on constructs as decided by and among various groups of humans.

    The social playground of the term race in no manner changes a single reality, despite different shapes, sizes, colors and practices — humans begat humans and will continue to beget humans, regardless of shape, size, practice or skin color.

    Humankind a race of beings who tower babble our way through rhetorical discourse about who we are and on occasion about which one of us is superior.

    Hey ma . . . watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Meimou
    Human kind is all of one species — one race categorize into various racial groups. There are no subspecies of humans — there are categorical distinctions based on constructs as decided by and among various groups of humans.

    There are no subspecies of animals - there are categorical distinctions based on constructs as decided by and among various groups of animals. Polar Bears and Grizzly bears are really the same subspecies, but the Polar bears are bear surpremist and who wish to kill and oppress the Grizzy bears who dindu nothin'

    The social playground of the term race in no manner changes a single reality, despite different shapes, sizes, colors and practices — humans begat humans and will continue to beget humans, regardless of shape, size, practice or skin color.

    So...different groups of humans evolved to have different size, shapes, and skin color but have the same brains. How is this possible?

    Humankind a race of beings who tower babble our way through rhetorical discourse about who we are and on occasion about which one of us is superior.

    HBD is not about superiority, it's about scientific reality. You could understand that if you won't so insecure.

    Hey ma . . . watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat.

    Sooner this than provide evidence for race denial.

    There are many at Unz who use syntax and diction to sound much more intelligent than they actually are - they all do it better than you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • TT says:
    @TT
    Pls provide your source website, not tweet.

    Do you have a world charts, including India, SK, Jp, Spore, US, UK, Sweden, Belgium, Oz, Nz, South Africa, Latin America for comparison for this so called UN Multi country survey source?

    I bet you don't in this propaganda data. Only a few countries are quoted so suspiciously, yet nothing mention on the top10 highest rape ranking occupied by Western countries & India, very strange isn't it?

    According to your chart, China 22.7%=317M rapists. So majority women would have been raped by now. Yet China crime rate is so low in ranking, safer than almost all West including US, UK, Canada, Oz, Nz, Norway, Sweden. India is also safer than most West.

    http://bewitter.com/countries-with-highest-rape-crime-in-the-world-2017/amp/
    2017 Highest Rape Crimes
    1. SAfrica 500k, 2. Sweden 6.6k 3. US 293K 4. UK 85k 5. India 33k 6. Canada 460k 7. NZ 8. Oz 9. Denmark 10. Zimbabwe

    https://www.trendrr.net/13049/countries-with-highest-rape-crime-famous-global-statistics/
    2017 Rape by 100,000 p. a.
    1. South Africa 4. Sweden, 7. Australia,10. Belgium, 11.US

    Wiki:
    China rape case is 33K p. a. out of 1400M, negligible per 100K.

    US 290K rape out of 340M, that will required ?% US men to be rapist if 20% of Chinese men are rapist?

    Consider China rated so much lower than all west in rape per 100k, with so much lower crime rate, that will required all West to be ~80% been rapist? Your chart is mere nonsense, absurd at best.

    https://www.numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp?title=2017
    2017 Crime index
    China is bottom of crime rating, the lower, the better.
    2. PapuaNG
    5. South Africa
    14. Bangladesh
    48. Indonesia
    53. US
    58. Sweden
    61. Norway
    66. India
    69. Oz
    70. UK
    78. Canada
    79. Nz
    91. Sri Lanka
    92. China

    Wiki said China is having very low 31.8K rape per year, that will take 9400yrs for Chinese to accomplish the feat of 300M rapist even they just doing once.

    PNG 60% rapist, what kind of nonsense?

    http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Rape-rate
    Rape rate per 100K
    India ranked lower than all west &:Spore. So are we wrong about India?

    1. South Africa 6. Sweden 11. Oz, 13. Belgium, 14. US, 16. Nz 24. Norway, 27. France, 29. Finland, 30. SK 82. Spore, 94. India, 97. Canada, 98. HK, 107. Syria, Yemen, Lebanon, 118. Egypt…
    China wasn't rated.

    https://knoema.com/atlas/topics/Crime-Statistics/Assaults-Kidnapping-Robbery-Sexual-Rape/Rape?mode=amp

    The United States of America is the top country by rape in the world. As of 2015, rape in the United States of America was 124,047 that accounts for 52.93 % of the world's rape. The top 5 countries (others are Mexico, Colombia, France, and Peru) account for 74.90 % of it. The world's total rape was estimated at 234,354 in 2015.
     
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics

    such as South Africa having 500,000 rapes per year,[15] China having 31,833 rapes a year,[16] Egypt having more than 200,000 rapes a year,[17] and the United Kingdom at 85,000 rapes a year.[18]
     
    Conclusion:

    India is a safe Haven compare to all West in rape crimes, esp the Top 10 rapist countries, 5lies US, UK, Canada, Oz, Nz. We have simply misunderstood India! Or most rape crimes wasn't reported?

    The most rapist countries are actually the WEST!!!

    Countries With Highest Rape Crime In The World 2017
    India rank 5 in this chart. But data use is old 2013. There are many inconsistency in many sites data. But in all data sources, India certainly is much better than US, UK in rape crimes. And better than most West in crimes rate.

    So look like we should welcome more Indians to US & UK since that will help lower crime rates & rape crimes!?

    [MORE]

    10. Zimbabwe

    According to UNICEF 42% of rape in this country is done with children and as they become older the rate of rape also increases along with it. It is said that every 90 minutes a woman is raped there, that is a horrific state of mind for anyone to be in while living there.

    9. Denmark

    According to Statistics 52% women have been either sexually abused or physically abused and there may be dozens more but the women tend to go quiet, and it is understandable such a horrendous incident people just want to forget about rather than relive as these are very traumatic experiences that one can go through. In Denmark what is surprising that not only have sexual abuse been accounted for by strangers but more women that is 1 out 5 have reported to have been victims of rape by either their partners from the past or the ones they were currently with, a very frightening way to not even be sure of the person you are with.

    8. Australia

    The land down under may be famous for its coral reefs and clear blue waters but what people don’t tell you is that it is one of the countries that has 30% of sexual assault victims. Not a pretty sight indeed but according to reports only 1% of Australian women face rape by strangers where as majority of the rape takes place by friends and family and more than half go unreported. A shocking 29% of rape is committed by people who come on an account of a date or through Social Media sites.

    7. New Zealand

    Back in 2013 a gang by the name of “Roast Busters” went through West side of Auckland raping underage girls, when the story made the new it became clear that this is just a many of a number of events that goes unnoticed in New Zealand, according to research this country has one of the highest rape crime rates than the entire world average (The Lancet articles). Not to mention not only 1 out of every 3 girls but even one out of every 6 boys are likely to be raped even before they hit the age of puberty at 16. The monstrous people who do such acts are reinforced due to the fear people have while reporting it to the police and that is why only 13% end up going to jail where as a whopping 91% go unnoticed an unreported.

    6. Canada

    Canada is a country that is known for its kind and warm people but what may surprise you is that it is also filled with savage creatures and that is why 460,000 sexual assaults have been reported every year in the country (Huffington Post). 80% of the crime victims are women and 60 % of the victims are under age (under 17). According to research they found that not only are 80% of the sex offenders married or in a long term relation but the same percentage accounts for them being known to the victims either they are friends or family of the victim.

    5. India

    According to statistics after every 20 minutes a woman is subjected to rape, and very few if any are reported because the women are so scared out of their wits and because of the submissiveness women are subjected too. Rape crime rate has sky rocketed in the past few years from 24,923 in 2012 to 33,707 in 2013, we do not see any decrease in the numbers anytime soon. The target age of victims is 18-30 years of age and because of the lack of justice system that surrounds the country there is still very little being done for the safety of the women in India.

    4. England & Wales

    Down the list you will see a few countries that may have never have crossed you mind, England and Wales are one of those countries where you would least expect such horrific crimes to occur. What is surprising is that although United Kingdom has not included different forms of sexual assault as rape (meaning only penetration by penis is considered a rape, any other type of penetration by finger or object is not considered rape) still the numbers are very high. As claimed by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and ONS (office for National Statistics and Home office) out of 85,000 rape crimes that occur every year in both England and Wales, 73,000 are females whereas 12,000 are males.

    3. United States of America (USA)

    Another name that is very surprising to occur but is true nonetheless, the super power is subjected to being the top 3 countries where Rape crime is disturbingly high. On average 293,000 victims are sexually assaulted every year, this means that a women is sexually assaulted after every 107 seconds a day. You would think that a country that focuses so much on freedom of speech women would report the crimes they face but as it is commonly seen the gruesome act is just too much for people to open up about which gives lay way to sexual offenders not being caught that is 98% of the offenders to be exact who will never set a foot into jail because of not being reported.

    2. Sweden

    Not all is fun and games in Europe as one of the countries that is known for being a great tourist destination also has 63 rape cases per 100,000 population (2013, Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention) one out of every three women in Sweden report that they have had a forceful sexual encounter even before they had hit their teenage years.

    What is more peculiar in this country is that with rapid times the rate have increased even more as according to reports only 421 rapes were reported in the year 1975 but in 2014 the number escalated to account for 6,620 rapes that were reported, this may mean that there are more voices standing up against what has been done to them but still a lot more must be done to put an end to these horrendous acts

    1. South Africa

    At the number one spot it is no surprise that we may see South Africa as the country already faces immense problems with poverty, malnutrition and so much more but to add to the list is a huge number of rape crimes 500,000 a year to be exact and still only one out of 9 rape cases are reported whereas the remaining are never reported (Medical Research Council). According to statistics 50 % of children have already faced this beastly crime before turning 18 and 24,892 rapes have been committed with children under the age of 18.

    Conclusion

    The numbers that we have reported are not something to be proud of but rather it is a food for thought there still needs to be a lot done to help those who have suffered and those who may suffer in the future. Awareness needs to be built upon the fact that remaining quiet is only fueling those who commit such crimes and power comes from those who will speak and fight in this war against rape.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon

    Then you Great people can help build Great India there with more civilize living condition starting from basic sanitary & stop rampant violent rapes on your own sisters & daughters.
     
    You misunderstood. I means "Protect your own sisters & daughters from violent rape. "

    More than 99.9999 or probably even more of Indians who never raped their daughter or sister or dogs or cats or babies or young boys
     
    Are you saying violent rape or incest is rare in India at 0.0001%? Then India is safer than the whole world.

    Even in many West developed countries that happen, UK is capital of paedophiles. British never deny like Indians did. US too, rape is not uncommon, so are China, Japan, Korea, Asia & elsewhere. Indonesia has animals like hens been raped till death. Cat is quite a challenge, haven't heard, dog yes.

    But India seem very severe with common news going around the world, are they fake?

    So how will an avg indian build toilets for people who dont have it? Also there are toilets in india. Do you really think they are none? While a lot of people still dont have access to toilets, they are getting there.
     
    Yes, they should return to help campaign gov for sanitary, with proper sewage system. This is very important to protect country water sources, hygiene, and dignity of people.

    China did a great effort after understanding that. 20yrs ago, even in some tourist area, toilet has no door. No more. Myanmar gov is doing very good progress, South East Asia overall is improving well. Even those on India aids list, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Mauritius were ok in my travel.

    But India, most deplorable. In cities, road side toilet is only a wall, urines are flowing everywhere. Even in busy public area, people just squat & ease, no one feel ashamed. Its reported at least 40% has no toilet access. And i did that too outdoor in India, where else? Even in train station platform, the track is toilet, where women are walking around.

    If others under India aids can do, so can India do so by buying less useless weapons of $10Billions. Unlike others, all my posting never insult India has no toilet access, but merely pointed out the fact, India still got so much to do before boasting as another great nation or superpower.

    US too, rape is not uncommon,

    Come on it is not just uncommon, it is viral and terrifying. In US one in six women would have faced assault in thier life time and a rape every 98 sec… in the most advanced nation. Sexual assault and offences against women are a usual allegation against luminaries and leading figures as a a staple news! The difference is that in India we have a media, with all its defects, far more honest than the corporate CIA tail-wagging one in US, which bring out these crimes to the spot light. And also a far more responsive society, with all its defects and troubles, that raises public out cry over these evils than the one in US where they simply condone as just another incident. And no need to narrate more on pedophilia (high profile ones), isn’t it? And the gun crime capital of the world..?

    British never deny like Indians did

    Oh are you sure? The western media cover up social evils than bringing it out into the open and addressing it, except for the so called immigrants. For it hurts their hubris. I fully agree with the allegations of acute social issues that we face in India and we struggle hard (at least some of us) to build our society, unlike the hate venom spewing racists who clog this comment space who are steeped up in hubris about the so called “advanced west” all the while forgetting that they are going down the drain in history. If you need more explanations I can give stats and facts. So much for now

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • @another fred
    What are the odds of there being group differences in this gene and its expression?

    "Ramped up fight-or-flight response points to history of warfare for humans and chimps"

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180419141517.htm

    I will reading the article you pnsted tomorrow, but my one USA friend as of now is Puerto Rican and Domican mixed, Bronx-born, cannot help but notice that his waK is like that of a chimp, it is strange.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • TT says:
    @JohnnyWalker123
    https://twitter.com/BlueWave_777_/status/988297838768439296

    https://twitter.com/BlueWave_777_/status/988297710355660800

    Pls provide your source website, not tweet.

    Do you have a world charts, including India, SK, Jp, Spore, US, UK, Sweden, Belgium, Oz, Nz, South Africa, Latin America for comparison for this so called UN Multi country survey source?

    I bet you don’t in this propaganda data. Only a few countries are quoted so suspiciously, yet nothing mention on the top10 highest rape ranking occupied by Western countries & India, very strange isn’t it?

    According to your chart, China 22.7%=317M rapists. So majority women would have been raped by now. Yet China crime rate is so low in ranking, safer than almost all West including US, UK, Canada, Oz, Nz, Norway, Sweden. India is also safer than most West.

    http://bewitter.com/countries-with-highest-rape-crime-in-the-world-2017/amp/

    2017 Highest Rape Crimes
    1. SAfrica 500k, 2. Sweden 6.6k 3. US 293K 4. UK 85k 5. India 33k 6. Canada 460k 7. NZ 8. Oz 9. Denmark 10. Zimbabwe

    https://www.trendrr.net/13049/countries-with-highest-rape-crime-famous-global-statistics/

    2017 Rape by 100,000 p. a.
    1. South Africa 4. Sweden, 7. Australia,10. Belgium, 11.US

    Wiki:
    China rape case is 33K p. a. out of 1400M, negligible per 100K.

    US 290K rape out of 340M, that will required ?% US men to be rapist if 20% of Chinese men are rapist?

    Consider China rated so much lower than all west in rape per 100k, with so much lower crime rate, that will required all West to be ~80% been rapist? Your chart is mere nonsense, absurd at best.

    [MORE]

    https://www.numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp?title=2017

    2017 Crime index
    China is bottom of crime rating, the lower, the better.
    2. PapuaNG
    5. South Africa
    14. Bangladesh
    48. Indonesia
    53. US
    58. Sweden
    61. Norway
    66. India
    69. Oz
    70. UK
    78. Canada
    79. Nz
    91. Sri Lanka
    92. China

    Wiki said China is having very low 31.8K rape per year, that will take 9400yrs for Chinese to accomplish the feat of 300M rapist even they just doing once.

    PNG 60% rapist, what kind of nonsense?

    http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Rape-rate

    Rape rate per 100K
    India ranked lower than all west &:Spore. So are we wrong about India?

    1. South Africa 6. Sweden 11. Oz, 13. Belgium, 14. US, 16. Nz 24. Norway, 27. France, 29. Finland, 30. SK 82. Spore, 94. India, 97. Canada, 98. HK, 107. Syria, Yemen, Lebanon, 118. Egypt…
    China wasn’t rated.

    https://knoema.com/atlas/topics/Crime-Statistics/Assaults-Kidnapping-Robbery-Sexual-Rape/Rape?mode=amp

    The United States of America is the top country by rape in the world. As of 2015, rape in the United States of America was 124,047 that accounts for 52.93 % of the world’s rape. The top 5 countries (others are Mexico, Colombia, France, and Peru) account for 74.90 % of it. The world’s total rape was estimated at 234,354 in 2015.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics

    such as South Africa having 500,000 rapes per year,[15] China having 31,833 rapes a year,[16] Egypt having more than 200,000 rapes a year,[17] and the United Kingdom at 85,000 rapes a year.[18]

    Conclusion:

    India is a safe Haven compare to all West in rape crimes, esp the Top 10 rapist countries, 5lies US, UK, Canada, Oz, Nz. We have simply misunderstood India! Or most rape crimes wasn’t reported?

    The most rapist countries are actually the WEST!!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @TT
    Countries With Highest Rape Crime In The World 2017
    India rank 5 in this chart. But data use is old 2013. There are many inconsistency in many sites data. But in all data sources, India certainly is much better than US, UK in rape crimes. And better than most West in crimes rate.

    So look like we should welcome more Indians to US & UK since that will help lower crime rates & rape crimes!?



    10. Zimbabwe



    According to UNICEF 42% of rape in this country is done with children and as they become older the rate of rape also increases along with it. It is said that every 90 minutes a woman is raped there, that is a horrific state of mind for anyone to be in while living there.



    9. Denmark

    According to Statistics 52% women have been either sexually abused or physically abused and there may be dozens more but the women tend to go quiet, and it is understandable such a horrendous incident people just want to forget about rather than relive as these are very traumatic experiences that one can go through. In Denmark what is surprising that not only have sexual abuse been accounted for by strangers but more women that is 1 out 5 have reported to have been victims of rape by either their partners from the past or the ones they were currently with, a very frightening way to not even be sure of the person you are with.



    8. Australia



    The land down under may be famous for its coral reefs and clear blue waters but what people don’t tell you is that it is one of the countries that has 30% of sexual assault victims. Not a pretty sight indeed but according to reports only 1% of Australian women face rape by strangers where as majority of the rape takes place by friends and family and more than half go unreported. A shocking 29% of rape is committed by people who come on an account of a date or through Social Media sites.



    7. New Zealand

    Back in 2013 a gang by the name of “Roast Busters” went through West side of Auckland raping underage girls, when the story made the new it became clear that this is just a many of a number of events that goes unnoticed in New Zealand, according to research this country has one of the highest rape crime rates than the entire world average (The Lancet articles). Not to mention not only 1 out of every 3 girls but even one out of every 6 boys are likely to be raped even before they hit the age of puberty at 16. The monstrous people who do such acts are reinforced due to the fear people have while reporting it to the police and that is why only 13% end up going to jail where as a whopping 91% go unnoticed an unreported.



    6. Canada



    Canada is a country that is known for its kind and warm people but what may surprise you is that it is also filled with savage creatures and that is why 460,000 sexual assaults have been reported every year in the country (Huffington Post). 80% of the crime victims are women and 60 % of the victims are under age (under 17). According to research they found that not only are 80% of the sex offenders married or in a long term relation but the same percentage accounts for them being known to the victims either they are friends or family of the victim.



    5. India



    According to statistics after every 20 minutes a woman is subjected to rape, and very few if any are reported because the women are so scared out of their wits and because of the submissiveness women are subjected too. Rape crime rate has sky rocketed in the past few years from 24,923 in 2012 to 33,707 in 2013, we do not see any decrease in the numbers anytime soon. The target age of victims is 18-30 years of age and because of the lack of justice system that surrounds the country there is still very little being done for the safety of the women in India.



    4. England & Wales

    Down the list you will see a few countries that may have never have crossed you mind, England and Wales are one of those countries where you would least expect such horrific crimes to occur. What is surprising is that although United Kingdom has not included different forms of sexual assault as rape (meaning only penetration by penis is considered a rape, any other type of penetration by finger or object is not considered rape) still the numbers are very high. As claimed by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and ONS (office for National Statistics and Home office) out of 85,000 rape crimes that occur every year in both England and Wales, 73,000 are females whereas 12,000 are males.



    3. United States of America (USA)



    Another name that is very surprising to occur but is true nonetheless, the super power is subjected to being the top 3 countries where Rape crime is disturbingly high. On average 293,000 victims are sexually assaulted every year, this means that a women is sexually assaulted after every 107 seconds a day. You would think that a country that focuses so much on freedom of speech women would report the crimes they face but as it is commonly seen the gruesome act is just too much for people to open up about which gives lay way to sexual offenders not being caught that is 98% of the offenders to be exact who will never set a foot into jail because of not being reported.



    2. Sweden

    Not all is fun and games in Europe as one of the countries that is known for being a great tourist destination also has 63 rape cases per 100,000 population (2013, Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention) one out of every three women in Sweden report that they have had a forceful sexual encounter even before they had hit their teenage years.

    What is more peculiar in this country is that with rapid times the rate have increased even more as according to reports only 421 rapes were reported in the year 1975 but in 2014 the number escalated to account for 6,620 rapes that were reported, this may mean that there are more voices standing up against what has been done to them but still a lot more must be done to put an end to these horrendous acts



    1. South Africa



    At the number one spot it is no surprise that we may see South Africa as the country already faces immense problems with poverty, malnutrition and so much more but to add to the list is a huge number of rape crimes 500,000 a year to be exact and still only one out of 9 rape cases are reported whereas the remaining are never reported (Medical Research Council). According to statistics 50 % of children have already faced this beastly crime before turning 18 and 24,892 rapes have been committed with children under the age of 18.

    Conclusion

    The numbers that we have reported are not something to be proud of but rather it is a food for thought there still needs to be a lot done to help those who have suffered and those who may suffer in the future. Awareness needs to be built upon the fact that remaining quiet is only fueling those who commit such crimes and power comes from those who will speak and fight in this war against rape.
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Indian WMM,
    fukusIndia’s stealth secret weapon to take over the world…….

    exhibit Nepal,

    Sooner or later, the voice of separation of the tarai districts may take place in Nepal. Therefore, the Nepal Army, the only organ left for safeguarding national sovereignty and national integrity, has to remain alert and introduce measures from which the tarai districts cannot be separated from Nepal’s map.
    First of all, Indian migration in tarai districts has to be stopped immediately.

    http://peoplesreview.com.np/2017/11/01/tarai-and-catalonia/

    London, Washington and New Delhi continue to coordinate their policies in the South Asian region. Their shared perception is that Nepal is getting closer to China,

    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/GE27Df03.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • What are the odds of there being group differences in this gene and its expression?

    Ramped up fight-or-flight response points to history of warfare for humans and chimps

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180419141517.htm

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    I will reading the article you pnsted tomorrow, but my one USA friend as of now is Puerto Rican and Domican mixed, Bronx-born, cannot help but notice that his waK is like that of a chimp, it is strange.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Essentially, Mr Derbyshire is criticizing Professor Reich for doing what he himself and his VDare friends do all the time: twisting science to prop up a pre-conceived political ideology. The modern European ethnic groups didn’t just drop ready-made out of the sky! Europe was populated by successive waves of invaders from central Asia who did indeed slaughter the men and marry the women, thereby creating a new gene pool and giving us the rich diversity of ethnic identities we know in Europe today. That’s established science. Mr Derbyshire then resorts to a rather silly propaganda trick: if you can’t refute your opponent’s argument, attribute to him an argument he didn’t make but which you can refute, refute that and claim you’ve refuted your opponent. Thus: “Does Prof. Reich really expect males from that second group to “embrace” their annihilation?” But earlier he quotes the professor: “Mixture is fundamental to who we are, and we need to embrace it, not deny that it occurred.” “We”. “We” obviously means modern white Americans and the professor’s argument is that they need to accept the scientific reality of their own European ancestry in place of the weird myths and distortions about Europe common in the US (and which we Europeans find amusing, at least until Americans try to ram them down our throats as historical and scientific “fact”!). I suspect that Mr Derbyshire’s “gripe” with Professor Reich is that he has presented a scientific view of genetics, thereby demolishing the rather comical pseudo-genetics which the VDare people use to prop up their political ideology.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Ynu are making a good point, but overpopulation is the biggest problem of all, the populations being destroyed, except in east and *parts of* south-east Asia (Malaysia of now, for example, is a slow-motion horror story of Islamism, as, in technically different ways, is Indonesia). The Burmese are correct in rejecting the Bengali invaders who call themselves ‘Rohingya’. Sure, it is unjust in the few cases where they were there for many generations.

    At the start of the great east Asian war, Burma (or Myanmar) had much the same state in the British empire and simhlar constition to as Australia or Canada, so largely independent. The reason the majority of Burmese nationalists took the side of Japan was the British having placed Indians at the top of the courts and bureaucracy there. NaturalJy, the Burmese did not like that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @Corvinus
    "And how about the left’s jackbooted fascism that holds that America belongs to every racial group except whites..."

    Which is patently false. First, you are absolutely misapplying the concept "fascism" here, which means "a form of radical authoritarian nationalism, characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and control of industry and commerce." The United States is not a fascist government, contrary to your tinfoil hattery. Second, America doesn't "belong" to any one racial or ethnic group. It consists of citizens, including whites, who have not been excluded in being part of the body politic or social fabric. You have a knack for wild generalizations. Third, whites have every liberty to form their own groups. It is just that not all white people are on board with the groups that YOU want to form or be part of. Which is their freedom of association to oppose.

    "and especially whites who don’t hate themselves?"

    In your world, whites hate themselves only if they do not conform to your belief system. Which, if you truly think about it, is ridiculous. White Americans are not monolithic. They belong to a number of groups, and love their membership in those groups. They need not be virtue signaled to death by your insistence that they only love themselves if they look out for all whites.

    "How come you never speak out against that bigotry? Hint: because to you and other lefties that’s a righteous and noble hate and bigotry."

    Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture. Again, do whites have the freedom of association to choose to include non-whites in their groups, and to marry and procreate with those groups? Why or why not?

    "If you put your thinking cap on you’d see that most of the diversity worshipping white and (((white))) leftists you look to for guidance live in whitetopias and rarely choose to associate with non-whites."

    It is a matter of economics here, not race. Upper-class people want to live in nice places, regardless of race or ethnicity. That is their liberty. It is reasonable and sensible for well-off folks to live in well-off places next to people who are also well-off. Again, it's about finances. Moreover, white people who live in such areas interact with non-whites on a day to day basis, whether it be at work or at play. You either don't see it, or if you do see it, you don't want to see it.

    "Somehow I doubt most of these people will freely choose to live in the equivalent of Detroit or San Paulo, Brazil, but if that’s what you all wish then more power to you and them if you’re really true believers in the cult of “muh diversity”."

    There is no cult here of diversity, just people from different races and ethnicities who choose to interact with one another. That is called being human.

    Now, regarding Detroit, there are a host of reasons for the downfall of that city other than racial matters. Would you like to know more, citizen, and become educated on the matter?

    According to what your crystal ball? I’ll do what is necessary to protect me, my friends and family and my people."

    Your people are white Americans, which includes me.

    "I’d venture that if and when that day ever comes the prospect of tens of thousands of heavily armed and pissed off white men will give you and other lefties the worst case of diarrhea in history."

    That is all fantasy, my friend. If there is this invasion that already has taken place in the States, and whites are about to become extinct, you choosing not to lift a finger now to do something about it tells me everything I need to know.

    ” … whites have every liberty to form their own groups. ”

    Not really. If a group of whites publicly professed in-group preference and wanted to coalesce around identitarian issues, white sjw Stalinists would move quickly, primarily on social media, to stigmatize such a group. Especially if said group was more serious than Richard Spencer’s cavalcade of gay Nazi camp.

    “Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture.”

    I will assume you’re being sincere: Apparently, you don’t follow trends. The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint or be doxxed, which will be followed by economic marginalization.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint
     
    if you're a Brit or Swede who thinks England or Sweden have a right to maintain their ethnic and/or cultural character, then from every orifice of the hive comes the screeching of 'Nazis! and 'white supremacists!!!!'

    "RACISTS!!!'

    if you're a white American who thinks Affirmative Action is wrong and racist and unfair, well then brace yourself for the orgy of hatred and screeching, 'white supremacists!!!'

    and it goes beyond race now even to include 'hateful constructs of the patriarchy'; like gender.

    that it's all prima facie insane, doesn't get in the way of they're screeching and hysterics.

    And even here on the Unz Review, there are people who would say that any desire of white Americans to maintain any shred of their (white = racist) culture or heritage, are nothing more than vile "white supremacists", who must be hounded and harangued for the crime of not hating their own kind (with the kind of visceral, rancorous race-hatred that they hate white people with ; )

    We live in a surreal idiocracy, where the most preposterous idiocies are given credence as if they were anything but the gibbering's of a drooling lunatic.

    All you have to do is realize they want what you have. White people have created amazing civilizations in Europe and N. America and elsewhere, and it's only natural that everyone else would want such things for themselves. Duh.

    But where it gets beyond ludicrous/obnoxious is when they demand white people have no right to even exist. Which is their mantra today, because they aren't laughed out of the room, as they obviously should be.
    , @Corvinus
    "If a group of whites publicly professed in-group preference and wanted to coalesce around identitarian issues, white sjw Stalinists would move quickly, primarily on social media, to stigmatize such a group."

    Yet, despite SJW machinations, those whites have the freedom to form their own in-group. It doesn't mean they are free from outside pressure. Besides, any group is "stigmatized" by their ideological opponents, so that argument goes out the door.

    "Especially if said group was more serious than Richard Spencer’s cavalcade of gay Nazi camp."

    Spencer's group is indeed serious. See, you just stigmatized his merry band, yet they still remain steadfast in their desire to gain footing in their community.

    “Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture.”

    "I will assume you’re being sincere: Apparently, you don’t follow trends."

    The trend is that the Coalition of the Fringes, Right and Left, write a narrative that normies find over-the-top.

    "The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint or be doxxed, which will be followed by economic marginalization."

    A societal mantra as dictated by radical white liberals, not whites in general. In similar fashion, the Alt Right demands that whites accept "race realism", lest they be labeled "race traitors" and summarily labeled as "enemies".

    Works both ways here.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Miro23

    Thus, the way I see it (based on his opinion and the various comments I see from Sunni Muslims); the fighting needs should stop as soon as it can and a political solution needs to be arrived at with the major players at the table; including people who have a serious stake in the matter like Iran, Iraq, Russia, Turkey, Jordan, etc.
     
    Thanks for your informed opinion. These things are not so clear looking from the outside, and Western reporting seems to be mostly useless.

    So the problem are the Israelis/US/Saudis who are pushing wars more than the Sunnis or Shias themselves.

    So the problem are the Israelis/US/Saudis who are pushing wars more than the Sunnis or Shias themselves.

    I would certainly say so. The average Sunni and Shiah get along OK – we’re not super chummy; they have their mosques and we have ours and we usually don’t pray behind each other – this is unlike say the various Sunni schools that may have slight variations in prayer, but make it a point to pray behind each other. It’s really only the takfiris that want to kill Shiah (as well as plenty of Sunnis they consider deviant). I had friends in UCLA who were Shiah, still do even though I consider myself as Orthodox Sunni as they come and believe Shiah positions are heterodox (and they reciprocate).

    This whole thing was really kicked off with the invasion of Iraq and the forces it unleashed. In times of desperation, war, crisis etc. some of the worst elements of society come out and this is simply part of human nature.

    Take for instance the break up of Yugoslavia. Let’s put the Muslims aside for a bit. In that conflict, once civil order broke down; Orthodox Serbs and Catholic Croats committed war crimes against each other’s populations. Things were going fine for a good long while, but this brought divisions, that most people really hadn’t cared about, to a crescendo.

    Another good example before this whole mess is the Armenia-Azerbaijan war in the 90′s. Azerbaijan is almost 90% Shiah, but plenty of Sunni volunteers went to fight on their side.

    There is little doubt in my head that much of this would simply not have occurred without the external interference. That doesn’t mean that, naively, everything was fine and dandy – rather external forces were the catalyst for the mess we see today.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • @EliteCommInc.
    "That’s because of regional differences in the human genome. Like any widely-distributed species, ours has developed regional varieties due to local inbreeding under well-understood genetic rules: founder effect, genetic drift, natural selection. The simplest name for these varieties—the one favored by Charles Darwin, the father of modern biology—is “races.”

    But we now know that it was an incorrect term and convolutes the meaning of what it means to be a human being. One can dress the matter up in all kinds intellectual and even valid scientific garb. The reality genetically is that we are all of one race -- human race. The issue is not all that complex.

    And withing the human race there are variation in the biological, social and intellectual, emotional existence and expression of the same. All of which has been shaped over millions of years by environmental actors static and nonstatic. That Darwin and others used race to make distinctions of human hierarchy of most to least human is an issue we have inherited and are now wrestling with. It is untruthful to claim that the academic community are race denialists, though I suspect that some are.

    The issue surrounds, the meaning of the variations and for whites in particular, the suggestion that they are not in fact at the top of the pyramid via genetics. And by challenging that standard exported throughout the world and enforced with great vigor -- a lot of white people are just scared. And many in some manner of panic are racing, no pun intended, though I suppose it works, to solidify their superior status in science.

    When the issue of race is discussed, in modernity, we are not talking about genetics, we are generally discussion its social construction of meaning. And while it is convenient to hoola hoop the debate into one of science, it is a slight of hand gimmick, for the purpose of blurring the matters of question by ignoring the bridging.

    I won't ignore the bridging.

    ________________________________

    Your point . . . .

    "As we all know, a peculiar orthodoxy about human nature has come up among the Liberal Arts and Grievance Studies (LAGS) types who staff academic administrations, media, and government bureaucracies, including those that approve money grants to research scientists. A key tenet of this orthodoxy: There Is No Such Thing As Race. According to this tenet, race is a “social construct,” a sort of collective optical illusion.


    There is certainly a strange thing happening in and among academics. But the nexus of that discussion has nothing to do with race being real or not. Continuing to make that claim is to abuse the issue(s). The second aspect of the argument concerning "race" as a social construct, is not one of optical illusion save that the social implications of racial superiority has been premised on some faulty science and reasoning that on test don't play out for a myriad of reasons.


    But in all my life I have never met anyone who claimed genetics didn't matter to human existence in the real.

    The reality genetically is that we are all of one race — human race.

    Well, actually, no. Mankind (homo sapiens) is not a race, but a species. A race is a subspecies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    Hence one od the many categorical debates about the meaning of race.


    Human kind is all of one species -- one race categorize into various racial groups. There are no subspecies of humans -- there are categorical distinctions based on constructs as decided by and among various groups of humans.

    The social playground of the term race in no manner changes a single reality, despite different shapes, sizes, colors and practices -- humans begat humans and will continue to beget humans, regardless of shape, size, practice or skin color.

    Humankind a race of beings who tower babble our way through rhetorical discourse about who we are and on occasion about which one of us is superior.

    Hey ma . . . watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat.
    , @Talha
    A breed, if you will.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    And withing the human race there are variation in the biological, social and intellectual, emotional existence and expression of the same.

    And some of those variations, many of which are unevenly distributed among the various "populations," advantage a higher or lower proportion of a given population with regard to circumstances and environments. Certain "populations" have a higher mean with regard to the variation that leads to the best chances of "success" in a given pursuit. This being reality, you can demand quotas for white sprinters or just accept the results of the race, pun intended.

    that variations deposited in varying degrees withing the human species among various groups of humans

    Saying

    “duh”

    seemed a bit trite.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Intelligent Dasein
    It will eventually come to light that David Reich's dry and lifeless style, as well as his extensive collaboration with mathematicians, both result from the fact that his genetic research is actually explaining nothing. He must use brutal statistical falsification in order to generate any results at all, and then he needs to write in an obscurantist manner in order to conceal the fact that he has no coherent story to tell.

    "Genetics" is not really a specific term, as it applies broadly to the study of origins; and not just the origins of living things, but the origins of anything. There have always been practical theories of genetics in the living realm, as offspring are clearly derived somehow from their progenerators and this is significant for determining what they will be. But today's obsession with biomolecular genetics and information is simply junk science, to put it kindly. The idea that there is some single, simple, unique causal factor responsible for transmitting information from one generation to the next, is a mythology that was fully developed in the absence of any empirical support. When DNA was discovered, it was immediately cast into this role and enthroned there ever since. The fact that DNA cannot perform this function is responsible for the increasingly arcane hypotheses needed to patch evolutionary theory together.

    In 50 years' time, no serious person will still be a Darwinist and "genetics" will have perished out of frustration and boredom.

    What brand of anti-Darwinist are you?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Unladen Swallow
    Read him before, Creationist
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Currahee
    "the black fact of superiority in running and fighting"

    African armies may be musical, don't know; but they can't fight.

    A big part of creating civilisation was realising that ‘fast running and thug-like fighting’ are not all that useful in a war. In Africa that didn’t happen, so they were helpless. War is not a sport.

    Read More
    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    This from people in the US who have thug lifed their way across the planet who are incapable of adhering to agreements they draft and force upon others. and are now mugging the middle east again . . .

    Next some genius will be spouting that the planet is over populated. And what the US needs is more immigrants to get rid of those .3% of violent blacks who want to take away white guns so when the apocalypse occurs -- they can "get white people."

    Good grief . . . superior analysis from IQ to superior morality has no end.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • laughing

    not very short –

    excuse me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    And withing the human race there are variation in the biological, social and intellectual, emotional existence and expression of the same.

    And some of those variations, many of which are unevenly distributed among the various "populations," advantage a higher or lower proportion of a given population with regard to circumstances and environments. Certain "populations" have a higher mean with regard to the variation that leads to the best chances of "success" in a given pursuit. This being reality, you can demand quotas for white sprinters or just accept the results of the race, pun intended.

    one Shorter perspective of the several I posit:

    version — mistaking muscle power for IQ is the history of European practice. During WWI, africans trained by the French were ensconced in a small french village. The villagers gradually accepted the Africans as they sought to supplement their incomes by engaging community projects and odd kibs. Initially, it was thought the africans simpletons, they spoke a very basic crude french. But eventually one women discovered that the africans had in fact been taught only rudimentary french. She took it upon herself to offer the africans the french as it was intended as language and lo and behold discovered that the blacks were in fact as sophisticated a people as those in the village and they adopted general french linguistics which they mastered as well or better than many french themselves.

    It was uncovered that the french deliberately denied teaching the language in full so as to maintain a superior status. The US refused to permit black US troops to fight along side their US brothers in arms. They assigned them to the French, who discovers that the blacks were as sophisticated humans as themselves. equal to or superior in bravery. And when they began awarding blacks medals for the same, the US military demanded they refrain from doing so — l’est they begin seeing themselves as equals.

    It is deeply embarrassing to visit a plantation only discover the unacknowledged technology that blacks brought to building technique (s), purposefulness and architectural design. It is the uncovering of the manipulation on mass scale that whites in power – have engaged to delimit knowledge about the intelligence of others. To ignore that is to miss the dilemma concerning the distribution of IQ.

    Power is not by definition linked to IQ.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Power is not by definition linked to IQ.

    Correct. Do you know what is linked to IQ? Chances for successful life outcomes in the modern world.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anarchyst
    There is another aspect of genetics and DNA coding that has not been explored. Today's scientists involved in genetics and DNA believe that much of our DNA merely consists of "place holders" and is of little importance, being considered "junk DNA". An interesting premise on DNA was presented by Dr. Michael Tellinger in his book "Slave Species of God". His premise is that this "junk DNA" is not "junk", at all, but has been purposely deactivated by extraterrestrials or some other "supreme being". Whether one believes in the existence of extraterrestrials or a supreme being, the premise that much of our DNA has been "deactivated" in order to control us is an interesting premise. It is possible that when humanity was "created", all of our DNA was active, resulting in the ability to communicate without limits--telepathy, etc. with the possession of extensive knowledge. If one takes the Biblical story of Adam and Eve being banished from the "Garden of Eden", it is possible that our "creator" purposely deactivated certain portions of our DNA in order to control us. The "Garden of Eden" story was written for the ages; for those who would not understand scientific principles of DNA and genetics.
    Attempting to apply scientific principles to Biblical stories, it could be argued that "Noah's Ark" was actually a DNA repository.
    Dr. Tellinger's premise is that our dormant, inactive DNA is slowly reactivating itself; hence, the continuing scientific advances in humanity.

    If what you propose is actually true, then human advancement is on the verge of massive acceleration, as the age of CRISPR, and other, yet more powerful genetic editing and engineering tools is now upon us.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • @Bliss

    I have four kids, I’ve got way better things to do with my time
     
    You seem to spend more time here sucking up to alt-right racists than with your kids.

    Thanks for more of your opinions.

    sucking up to alt-right

    It should be clear to anybody here, I’m not interested in becoming their “wing man” and I’m not interested in begging them to accept me or let me stay in the West. I’m preesenting them a solution to their problem; a solution that will require them to re-calibrate their understanding of how to relate to the question of race and how to prioritize it in the hierarchy of purpose.

    If they don’t like the solution, they are welcome to look for others – no skin off my back.

    I certainly won’t be spending time sucking up to the Left, as Dr. Shadee Elmasry wisely distilled their positions:

    than with your kids

    First, why not get married have a few kids 3-4 and then balance work with driving them back and forth from this/that practice, helping with their homework, dedicating your weekend to keeping them busy and happy going to the Y for swimming, BJJ classes, etc. – then I’ll give your advice any weight. So…how many kids do you have again?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • Mixing with Bushmen seems a good explanation for giant bums on so many black women.

    Overeating probably doesn’t help (or does, since a giant bum is seen as desirable by many black men).

    I compare giant arses on obese women of European, African, and east Asian descent, my mental term is ‘bench arse’. If you were sitting opposite, you could use it as a chair. The Africans are way on top. I am convinced that this is from earlier intermixing with Bushmen women, and similar types that were wiped out by the Bantu invasion from the north.then selection for huge bums.

    With European women, bench arse tends to coincide with the combo of obesity and same-sex attraction. Otherwise rare, even among the obese.

    I am friends with three or so women who are quite obese in my life, so east Asian, but they do not have bums one may see and think of ‘possible seating’.

    Of course, actually sitting on a bench arse without permission would cause great offence and trouble,

    Hating to even mention the name, but does anybody *not* think that Kim Kardassian had implants to make a giant bum for Kanye West? I pay little attentinn to such garbage , but it is seeming obvious from photos.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    Kim's "bench bum"?

    The old phrase was "five and a half axe handles wide".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @Rurik

    holocaust’ scam
     
    everyone who denies the Holy Holocaust - when the most evil people that ever lived tried to murder God Himself (the Jewish people) are as bad as the Nazis in Hungary who demand to remain Nazis, who refuse to do what they must - blend their Nazi genes away in a sea of homogenizing humanity.

    We are all humans, but some humans, (Nazis like the Hungarians) want to preserve their unique Nazi ethnic identity. This is where George Soros comes in, and flings open the gates to the Nazi kingdom, to a purifying wave of African migrants and gypsies and Muslims and everyone else they can get, who in time, will blend away the vile identity of Hungary's (and Germany's and Norway's and France's) Nazis, and save God's people from the next time Hitler wants to make soap and lampshades.

    ” … to a purifying wave of African migrants … ”

    should be

    ” … to a putrefying wave of African migrants … ”

    that’s more accurate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • @iffen
    And withing the human race there are variation in the biological, social and intellectual, emotional existence and expression of the same.

    And some of those variations, many of which are unevenly distributed among the various "populations," advantage a higher or lower proportion of a given population with regard to circumstances and environments. Certain "populations" have a higher mean with regard to the variation that leads to the best chances of "success" in a given pursuit. This being reality, you can demand quotas for white sprinters or just accept the results of the race, pun intended.

    The peoples on the America’s survived successfully before Europeans arrived. In fact they have managed to exist successfully in spite of Europeans. The people’s on the Continent have survived and son so successfully longer than the Europeans. And they both survived in periods of drought, famine, warfare, flood, earthquake, etc. And have thrived in spite of it all. They managed to develop waterways, plumbing, roads, technology without destroying the environments they thrived in.

    I think what we are beginning to understand about IQ as defined by the European mind is that it is predicated on need and desire (desire from idleness). On neither continent did the people’s needs vast arrays of vaccines, though people in Africa had as practice vaccinations before encountering Europeans. On neither continent did the people’s engage in killing their environments for sport as to demonstrate superiority. A practice that has thrown nearly every — well every environment out of balance that Europeans came into contact with.

    Perhaps, the construct of IQ demonstrates the every present insecurity that Europeans are constantly trying to outrun. The incessant desire to demonstrate superiority. And yet history tells us that to be successful, one need not be superior in any manner. Perhaps, the obsession with IQ to demonstrate superiority — is but the insecurity of a child constantly having to prove itself to the point of exhaustion. One considers the genius of national parks. When considering why they were created, one must consider how such an obvious composition could have been an oversight in developing cities in the first place.

    One considers the circular rhetorical dynamic, Europeans develop solutions to more problems that they themselves create than the environment demands they create to overcome. Perhaps that is why so many of the indigenous populations look at our heritage as one full of reckless energy that we install as intelligence. And no greater example as that of the Europeans willingness to utterly destroy for the sake of acknowledging superior status as opposed to being a success on the planet. Wiping out the buffalo/bison for profit did not end the native american populations.

    Importing immigrants is not going to save the US republic and one would think people with a successful IQ would learn that lesson from obvious hard core realities of history. Yet the people touting superior intelligence are the advocates of destructive social policies and claiming to be superior humans.

    You bet there is variation in the distribution, but how that interacts with environment or whether said distribution makes humans of this or that more successful is highly dependent on the definition and purpose of success.

    The Jellyfish it is said has successfully exists longer than humans — as have whales, and even monkey’s whether they have the ability to successfully survive humans is predicated on their ability to survive are destructive nature of the few who seem incapable of living without destroying to demonstrate their superior quality.

    Read More
    • Agree: Okechukwu
    • Replies: @iffen

    You bet there is variation in the distribution, but how that interacts with environment or whether said distribution makes humans of this or that more successful is highly dependent on the definition and purpose of success.
     
    Couldn't agree more. It is up to the individual to decide if he prefers subsistence farming over modern technological economies and to make a determination as to which is "better."

    BTW, you keep going on and on about superiority and hierarchy and I haven't mention that at all.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Why is the book like this?

    Same old story. Galileo knew. Official Geo-centrism vs Empirical Helio-centrism.

    When it comes to evolutionary science, there is bio-centrism under attack from ideo-centrism.

    Reich is torn. He grew up under the Shoah Narrative that has become like a faith. It said German 'Aryans' believed in racial differences and waged wars and committed genocide. But good guys won and established that All Peoples are Equal. This is the faith of the West, as powerful as Geo-centrism in Galileo's time. It was especially useful to Jews who were targeted by 'Aryans'.

    And yet it was always an uneasy myth. After all, Germans feared Jews because they were 'too smart'. Also, black athletes who demolished the 'aryan' myth of superiority established the black fact of superiority in running and fighting.

    “the black fact of superiority in running and fighting”

    African armies may be musical, don’t know; but they can’t fight.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beckow
    A big part of creating civilisation was realising that 'fast running and thug-like fighting' are not all that useful in a war. In Africa that didn't happen, so they were helpless. War is not a sport.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • @Bliss
    The worst parts of the US are still better than the best parts of India in most ways: they have reliable electricity, water supply, food supply, garbage collection, schools for everyone, medical care etc.

    Boastful indians like you are probably the most shameless people on the planet.

    I didn’t mention India in that comment at all (not am I an Indian). You meant to reply to ‘South Asian’.

    It takes a negro level of stupid to get something that basic wrong.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Daniel Chieh
    Well, it does depend on the individual. But my general experience is that Indians tend to be highly nepotistic and power-seeking(I've written once before about an insanely company-destroying scheme one ran; they can be unbelievably toxic), American whites tend to be honest and well-rounded, Russians to be highly skilled and focused if generally dissatisfied with everything around them, and Chinese to be skillful but have an annoying tendency to slack off right at the end(I call it "doing it 90%", but quite often, being lazy about the 10% gives them a terrible reputation).

    I suppose I've been hard on Indians so much that I should mention one really impressive case I knew. This was a guy who was an insanely dedicated PHP programmer, extremely good and very talented in every way. He was so unambitious that in spite of his skills which clearly merited over 6 digits, he was happy only ever making $20 or so an hour, taking the train and reading a book every day while sharing an apartment with three other guys. So in most ways, he was contrary to the usual expectations, but I did feel rather sad for him because he really did just seem to want to be a slave and nothing else.

    Its just generalities, though.

    If you had to compare American corporate managers to Chinese corporate managers, what would you say are the similarities and differences?

    My general sense is that the Chinese like to promote workers with “hard” technical skills into management. American corporate culture (outside of the software industry) seems more amenable to promoting people who are socially adept or good at bull5hitting. These are (of course) generalizations and there are plenty of competent American managers, but I think Corporate America places more emphasis on being verbally facile. I think that might explain some of the differences between the American and Chinese economies.

    It seems like the ambition of the average Chinese kid is to study engineering at Tsinghua and then open a factory to produce something of value. The ambition of the average American kid (when he’s not dreaming of being a rapper or celebrity) is to have some sort of BS job like “corporate social media director.” The more above-average American kids prefer profesisons like law or finance. American seem to disdain acquiring “hard” skills and doing real work, instead preferring jobs in which there’s a lot of talking and self-promoting.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • It will eventually come to light that David Reich’s dry and lifeless style, as well as his extensive collaboration with mathematicians, both result from the fact that his genetic research is actually explaining nothing. He must use brutal statistical falsification in order to generate any results at all, and then he needs to write in an obscurantist manner in order to conceal the fact that he has no coherent story to tell.

    “Genetics” is not really a specific term, as it applies broadly to the study of origins; and not just the origins of living things, but the origins of anything. There have always been practical theories of genetics in the living realm, as offspring are clearly derived somehow from their progenerators and this is significant for determining what they will be. But today’s obsession with biomolecular genetics and information is simply junk science, to put it kindly. The idea that there is some single, simple, unique causal factor responsible for transmitting information from one generation to the next, is a mythology that was fully developed in the absence of any empirical support. When DNA was discovered, it was immediately cast into this role and enthroned there ever since. The fact that DNA cannot perform this function is responsible for the increasingly arcane hypotheses needed to patch evolutionary theory together.

    In 50 years’ time, no serious person will still be a Darwinist and “genetics” will have perished out of frustration and boredom.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Henry's Cat
    What brand of anti-Darwinist are you?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Why is the book like this?

    Same old story. Galileo knew. Official Geo-centrism vs Empirical Helio-centrism.

    When it comes to evolutionary science, there is bio-centrism under attack from ideo-centrism.

    Reich is torn. He grew up under the Shoah Narrative that has become like a faith. It said German 'Aryans' believed in racial differences and waged wars and committed genocide. But good guys won and established that All Peoples are Equal. This is the faith of the West, as powerful as Geo-centrism in Galileo's time. It was especially useful to Jews who were targeted by 'Aryans'.

    And yet it was always an uneasy myth. After all, Germans feared Jews because they were 'too smart'. Also, black athletes who demolished the 'aryan' myth of superiority established the black fact of superiority in running and fighting.

    Germans feared Jews because they were ‘too smart’.

    Name one Jew you can mention in the same sentence as Kepler, Leibniz, Gödel, Frege, Weierstrass, Heisenberg, Riemann, Hilbert, Planck.

    Oh, yeah, Emmy Nother and the intellectual middleman, Albert Einstein, who borrowed from the relativity theory of Poincare and Lorentz and added slight amplifications. But hey, when you control the narrative Einstein is the greatest thinker in history and Maya Angelou is the greatest writer and poet.

    Read More
    • Agree: Che Guava
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    Agree.

    It may be just my interpretation, but I get the impression that physicists themselves express less adulation for Einstein than does the general(ly misled) public.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • @Talha

    Material advancement is not a sine qua non of public hygiene
     
    .
    Completely agree. My comment was simply about lack of a functional sewer system and running water. I know people that have traveled through some of the toughest parts of the third world in Muslim areas. The people there might be poor, but they keep up with the rules of ritual purity and hygiene.

    In fact, they would never think about not washing their hands after using the restroom - something I've seen people do in our office restroom time and time again; I think women might be better about this, but plenty of men seem to have an aversion to washing their hands.

    I never touch the door handle in those places without a paper towel.

    cleaner than India
     
    I wonder if this has to do with the caste system which has gradations based on levels of purity - the bottom being those that are not expected to have the same level of purity as the few at the top. I'm no expert on this subject, but this paper seems to imply that is one of the issues at the root:
    "This chapter limits itself to a discussion of the role played by caste and untouchability in severely constraining the sustainability of sanitation programmes in India. We are not arguing that this is the only challenge facing programmes such as CLTS in India, but reducing OD in India would be impossible without understanding and challenging notions of purity and pollution which prevent Indians from adopting and using latrines."
    https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/web.sas.upenn.edu/dist/1/140/files/2016/06/CHAPTER-17_-Purity-pollution-and-untouchability_-1r06ybb.pdf

    There is no same stratification in, say, Muslim cultures where the poor and the rich are expected to maintain the same rules of hygiene and ritual purity.

    Peace.

    Good point. Having an outhouse means someone else (an untouchable) will clean up your mess for you.
    The caste system also messed India up by fragmenting its polity, as a result of which public property is abused like nowhere else.. the tragedy of the commons on steroids.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @Miro23

    I think you may be making the mistake of seeing the French Revolution as a spontaneous uprising of the oppressed masses. Most of the revolutions of the 17th and 18th centuries were uprisings of the increasingly powerful and wealthy middle classes who weren’t exploited or oppressed but who saw the chance of looting the aristocracy.
     
    Who was looting who? As background, my view is that aristocracies have to earn their position a national leaders. Early on it was quite straightforward, and usually on the battlefield, for example John Churchill, the 1st Duke of Marlborough:

    His leadership of the allied armies consolidated Britain's emergence as a front-rank power. He successfully maintained unity among the allies, thereby demonstrating his diplomatic skills. Throughout ten consecutive campaigns during the Spanish Succession war, Marlborough held together a discordant coalition through his sheer force of personality and raised the standing of British arms to a level not known since the Middle Ages. Although in the end he could not compel total capitulation from his enemies, his victories allowed Britain to rise from a minor to a major power, ensuring the country's growing prosperity throughout the 18th century.

    Wikipedia.
     
    But by the "Belle Epoque" 1871-1914 European aristocracies were a useless decadent elite.

    I would connect the rise in power of the commercial middle classes and industrialists to the Industrial Revolution. They were contributing more and wanted political power, and they got it through their money and democracy (actually allied with the old aristocracy) with the downside of the not so welcome growth of a politically aware working class.

    For me this was the start of a classic problem that still hasn't been resolved. The commercial and industrial elite should be the new aristocracy on grounds of wealth, power and influence, but they are motivated by the desire for private profit and will manipulate the state to enrich themselves. Classic 21st century USA.

    The French revolution set the scene, and was somewhat earlier 1789 - 1799, but it's a fact that all French non-aristocratic classes were exploited and oppressed through excessive taxation - and I would accept the consensus that this triggered the revolution.

    Churchill of Marlborough was a snake. A remarkably talented snake, but still a snake.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dfordoom

    Churchill of Marlborough was a snake. A remarkably talented snake, but still a snake.
     
    Agreed. Treachery seemed to run in the Churchill family.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • @nickels
    I think it is a unique and important time in the history of science. Science has exposed itself as mystical Neo-Platonism.
    Most of what calls itself science is actually fable generation for problems that are massively undetermined. And the particular fable that wins out is the one that justifies the ruling class's ideology. Every time.
    Just remember this rule of thumb: if the scientist can't build it, drive it or fly it, it isn't science-it's propaganda.
    It has alway been so. In fact, many working assumptions of Western, post Enlightenment culture are nothing more than Neo-Platonic mythology.

    Scientific arrogance is rampant in today’s society. If an ordinary person makes an observation, it is considered a “myth” or a “fable” until it is personally observed by a “scientist”. This arrogance propels what is considered science into the realm of being a “religion”, not unlike “holocaustianity ™” which itself, has so many holes in it, outright fabrications, lies,, and outright impossibilities, but is still taken as total truth, subjecting those who dare to go against the prevailing orthodoxy to prosecution and incarceration in many countries for merely seeking out the truth.
    Science is no different…
    Mariners from ancient times made their oceanic observations of “sea monsters”, giant eels, squids and other large ocean-dwelling creatures and have always been discredited by “scientists”. It turns out that these giant sea creatures DO exist, despite the deniability of so-called “scientists”.
    Another observation by mariners is the “super wave”, which has been responsible for the destruction of many ocean-going vessels which were also discredited by “scientists”, just because they did not personally observe them.. These “super waves” have been observed from orbiting satellites.
    It turns out that these old-time mariners were not so “stupid” and “backwards” as scientists claim.
    Another example of scientific arrogance involves weather phenomenon, particularly tornadoes. There have been ordinary people who have observed tornadoes in action, but were informed that they were merely “straight line winds” despite funnel clouds being observed.
    Let’s not forget “funding” especially from government agencies that are looking to promote their agenda, the truth be damned. “Climate change” is but one prime example of scientific arrogance, misconduct, and malpractice taking place. “Climate” is ALWAYS changing and is actually influenced by solar factors to a much greater degree than previously believed. There are no SUVs on Mars or Venus, (one of the climate change crowd’s blame for “global warming”) yet solar variability has been observed on other celestial bodies. The East Anglia emails are the “smoking gun” in the “climate change” fraud. FOLLOW THE MONEY…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • Anon[107] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    I dont disgaree with most of what you said, but then you say something like this:

    ''The world simply must stop Indians invasion through mass migration, and send every single one back to where they are, India. Then you Great people can help build Great India there with more civilize living condition starting from basic sanitary & stop rampant violent rapes on your own sisters & daughters.''

    More than 99.9999 or probably even more of Indians who never raped their daughter or sister or dogs or cats or babies or young boys and if some among them who comes to the west to make a honest living, should go back and stop raping his sisters and daughters and build toilets? Are you saying they should not rape when they didnt rape to begin with? and also build toilets for others. Building toilets needs a lot of govt permissions like everywhere. The water and sewege supply boards needs to give clearance. So how will an avg indian build toilets for people who dont have it? Also there are toilets in india. Do you really think they are none? While a lot of people still dont have access to toilets, they are getting there.

    If you dont want indians to come to the west fine, but dont say stuff like that just because they came to the west or defended themselves when somebody called them idiots or rapists or implied them as evil. A few cousins of mine are in the west and they make a honest living and they are not rapists of other women or their sisters or daughters or anybody.

    Then you Great people can help build Great India there with more civilize living condition starting from basic sanitary & stop rampant violent rapes on your own sisters & daughters.

    You misunderstood. I means “Protect your own sisters & daughters from violent rape. ”

    More than 99.9999 or probably even more of Indians who never raped their daughter or sister or dogs or cats or babies or young boys

    Are you saying violent rape or incest is rare in India at 0.0001%? Then India is safer than the whole world.

    Even in many West developed countries that happen, UK is capital of paedophiles. British never deny like Indians did. US too, rape is not uncommon, so are China, Japan, Korea, Asia & elsewhere. Indonesia has animals like hens been raped till death. Cat is quite a challenge, haven’t heard, dog yes.

    But India seem very severe with common news going around the world, are they fake?

    So how will an avg indian build toilets for people who dont have it? Also there are toilets in india. Do you really think they are none? While a lot of people still dont have access to toilets, they are getting there.

    Yes, they should return to help campaign gov for sanitary, with proper sewage system. This is very important to protect country water sources, hygiene, and dignity of people.

    China did a great effort after understanding that. 20yrs ago, even in some tourist area, toilet has no door. No more. Myanmar gov is doing very good progress, South East Asia overall is improving well. Even those on India aids list, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Mauritius were ok in my travel.

    But India, most deplorable. In cities, road side toilet is only a wall, urines are flowing everywhere. Even in busy public area, people just squat & ease, no one feel ashamed. Its reported at least 40% has no toilet access. And i did that too outdoor in India, where else? Even in train station platform, the track is toilet, where women are walking around.

    If others under India aids can do, so can India do so by buying less useless weapons of $10Billions. Unlike others, all my posting never insult India has no toilet access, but merely pointed out the fact, India still got so much to do before boasting as another great nation or superpower.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RMCT

    US too, rape is not uncommon,
     
    Come on it is not just uncommon, it is viral and terrifying. In US one in six women would have faced assault in thier life time and a rape every 98 sec... in the most advanced nation. Sexual assault and offences against women are a usual allegation against luminaries and leading figures as a a staple news! The difference is that in India we have a media, with all its defects, far more honest than the corporate CIA tail-wagging one in US, which bring out these crimes to the spot light. And also a far more responsive society, with all its defects and troubles, that raises public out cry over these evils than the one in US where they simply condone as just another incident. And no need to narrate more on pedophilia (high profile ones), isn't it? And the gun crime capital of the world..?

    British never deny like Indians did
     
    Oh are you sure? The western media cover up social evils than bringing it out into the open and addressing it, except for the so called immigrants. For it hurts their hubris. I fully agree with the allegations of acute social issues that we face in India and we struggle hard (at least some of us) to build our society, unlike the hate venom spewing racists who clog this comment space who are steeped up in hubris about the so called "advanced west" all the while forgetting that they are going down the drain in history. If you need more explanations I can give stats and facts. So much for now
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @Talha

    How do regular Sunnis see this? A success, a failure or what?
     
    I cannot arrogate myself to speak on behalf of all Sunnis. I can only speak of the ones I am most familiar with - traditional ones and even more moderate minded ones are not happy with Saudi, that's being generous. Saudi has not only helped destroy Syria but has caused a humanitarian crisis in Yemen.

    That said, I don't know of a single Sunni in my circle who likes the Assad regime. Many of them, like myself feel his saving grace is that the people who would replace him after the civil war are even worse.

    My personal go to person on these matters is Shaykh Muhammad Yaqoubi who is a traditional scholar (and Sufi shaykh) in exile in Moroccco. He is very out-spoken about the damage done by Saudis to the Muslim world, yet is also against the Assad regime. He spoke out against the regime early on and had to leave the country, however - as early as 2015 he was stating publicly; " continuing the fight is no longer in the interest of Syrians."

    Thus, the way I see it (based on his opinion and the various comments I see from Sunni Muslims); the fighting needs should stop as soon as it can and a political solution needs to be arrived at with the major players at the table; including people who have a serious stake in the matter like Iran, Iraq, Russia, Turkey, Jordan, etc.

    Peace.

    Thus, the way I see it (based on his opinion and the various comments I see from Sunni Muslims); the fighting needs should stop as soon as it can and a political solution needs to be arrived at with the major players at the table; including people who have a serious stake in the matter like Iran, Iraq, Russia, Turkey, Jordan, etc.

    Thanks for your informed opinion. These things are not so clear looking from the outside, and Western reporting seems to be mostly useless.

    So the problem are the Israelis/US/Saudis who are pushing wars more than the Sunnis or Shias themselves.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha

    So the problem are the Israelis/US/Saudis who are pushing wars more than the Sunnis or Shias themselves.
     
    I would certainly say so. The average Sunni and Shiah get along OK - we're not super chummy; they have their mosques and we have ours and we usually don't pray behind each other - this is unlike say the various Sunni schools that may have slight variations in prayer, but make it a point to pray behind each other. It's really only the takfiris that want to kill Shiah (as well as plenty of Sunnis they consider deviant). I had friends in UCLA who were Shiah, still do even though I consider myself as Orthodox Sunni as they come and believe Shiah positions are heterodox (and they reciprocate).

    This whole thing was really kicked off with the invasion of Iraq and the forces it unleashed. In times of desperation, war, crisis etc. some of the worst elements of society come out and this is simply part of human nature.

    Take for instance the break up of Yugoslavia. Let's put the Muslims aside for a bit. In that conflict, once civil order broke down; Orthodox Serbs and Catholic Croats committed war crimes against each other's populations. Things were going fine for a good long while, but this brought divisions, that most people really hadn't cared about, to a crescendo.

    Another good example before this whole mess is the Armenia-Azerbaijan war in the 90's. Azerbaijan is almost 90% Shiah, but plenty of Sunni volunteers went to fight on their side.

    There is little doubt in my head that much of this would simply not have occurred without the external interference. That doesn't mean that, naively, everything was fine and dandy - rather external forces were the catalyst for the mess we see today.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • @Escher
    Material advancement is not a sine qua non of public hygiene. I have traveled in some fairly poor countries - all of which were significantly cleaner than India.

    Material advancement is not a sine qua non of public hygiene

    .
    Completely agree. My comment was simply about lack of a functional sewer system and running water. I know people that have traveled through some of the toughest parts of the third world in Muslim areas. The people there might be poor, but they keep up with the rules of ritual purity and hygiene.

    In fact, they would never think about not washing their hands after using the restroom – something I’ve seen people do in our office restroom time and time again; I think women might be better about this, but plenty of men seem to have an aversion to washing their hands.

    I never touch the door handle in those places without a paper towel.

    cleaner than India

    I wonder if this has to do with the caste system which has gradations based on levels of purity – the bottom being those that are not expected to have the same level of purity as the few at the top. I’m no expert on this subject, but this paper seems to imply that is one of the issues at the root:
    “This chapter limits itself to a discussion of the role played by caste and untouchability in severely constraining the sustainability of sanitation programmes in India. We are not arguing that this is the only challenge facing programmes such as CLTS in India, but reducing OD in India would be impossible without understanding and challenging notions of purity and pollution which prevent Indians from adopting and using latrines.”

    https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/web.sas.upenn.edu/dist/1/140/files/2016/06/CHAPTER-17_-Purity-pollution-and-untouchability_-1r06ybb.pdf

    There is no same stratification in, say, Muslim cultures where the poor and the rich are expected to maintain the same rules of hygiene and ritual purity.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Escher
    Good point. Having an outhouse means someone else (an untouchable) will clean up your mess for you.
    The caste system also messed India up by fragmenting its polity, as a result of which public property is abused like nowhere else.. the tragedy of the commons on steroids.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • There is another aspect of genetics and DNA coding that has not been explored. Today’s scientists involved in genetics and DNA believe that much of our DNA merely consists of “place holders” and is of little importance, being considered “junk DNA”. An interesting premise on DNA was presented by Dr. Michael Tellinger in his book “Slave Species of God”. His premise is that this “junk DNA” is not “junk”, at all, but has been purposely deactivated by extraterrestrials or some other “supreme being”. Whether one believes in the existence of extraterrestrials or a supreme being, the premise that much of our DNA has been “deactivated” in order to control us is an interesting premise. It is possible that when humanity was “created”, all of our DNA was active, resulting in the ability to communicate without limits–telepathy, etc. with the possession of extensive knowledge. If one takes the Biblical story of Adam and Eve being banished from the “Garden of Eden”, it is possible that our “creator” purposely deactivated certain portions of our DNA in order to control us. The “Garden of Eden” story was written for the ages; for those who would not understand scientific principles of DNA and genetics.
    Attempting to apply scientific principles to Biblical stories, it could be argued that “Noah’s Ark” was actually a DNA repository.
    Dr. Tellinger’s premise is that our dormant, inactive DNA is slowly reactivating itself; hence, the continuing scientific advances in humanity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @myself
    If what you propose is actually true, then human advancement is on the verge of massive acceleration, as the age of CRISPR, and other, yet more powerful genetic editing and engineering tools is now upon us.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I think it is a unique and important time in the history of science. Science has exposed itself as mystical Neo-Platonism.
    Most of what calls itself science is actually fable generation for problems that are massively undetermined. And the particular fable that wins out is the one that justifies the ruling class’s ideology. Every time.
    Just remember this rule of thumb: if the scientist can’t build it, drive it or fly it, it isn’t science-it’s propaganda.
    It has alway been so. In fact, many working assumptions of Western, post Enlightenment culture are nothing more than Neo-Platonic mythology.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    Scientific arrogance is rampant in today's society. If an ordinary person makes an observation, it is considered a "myth" or a "fable" until it is personally observed by a "scientist". This arrogance propels what is considered science into the realm of being a "religion", not unlike "holocaustianity ™" which itself, has so many holes in it, outright fabrications, lies,, and outright impossibilities, but is still taken as total truth, subjecting those who dare to go against the prevailing orthodoxy to prosecution and incarceration in many countries for merely seeking out the truth.
    Science is no different...
    Mariners from ancient times made their oceanic observations of "sea monsters", giant eels, squids and other large ocean-dwelling creatures and have always been discredited by "scientists". It turns out that these giant sea creatures DO exist, despite the deniability of so-called "scientists".
    Another observation by mariners is the "super wave", which has been responsible for the destruction of many ocean-going vessels which were also discredited by "scientists", just because they did not personally observe them.. These "super waves" have been observed from orbiting satellites.
    It turns out that these old-time mariners were not so "stupid" and "backwards" as scientists claim.
    Another example of scientific arrogance involves weather phenomenon, particularly tornadoes. There have been ordinary people who have observed tornadoes in action, but were informed that they were merely "straight line winds" despite funnel clouds being observed.
    Let's not forget "funding" especially from government agencies that are looking to promote their agenda, the truth be damned. "Climate change" is but one prime example of scientific arrogance, misconduct, and malpractice taking place. "Climate" is ALWAYS changing and is actually influenced by solar factors to a much greater degree than previously believed. There are no SUVs on Mars or Venus, (one of the climate change crowd's blame for "global warming") yet solar variability has been observed on other celestial bodies. The East Anglia emails are the "smoking gun" in the "climate change" fraud. FOLLOW THE MONEY...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Does Prof. Reich really expect males from that second group to “embrace” their annihilation?

    Yeah, Bruce Lee kicked Derb's ass but he still ran off with a Chinese girl.

    That is his granddaughter you are talking about… shame on you for suggesting it is something other than what it is. Derb can do no wrong, morally or otherwise!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • @Anonymous
    ''Its a higher caste privilege to rape low caste. Most Indians know.''

    I am a higher caste person and no such thing exists. And the rest of your comment is filled with so many extreme exaggerations. A few people do that and you accuse all the millions of the people of the caste and hundreds of millions of the country.

    It will be Good if you can help clarify. All i have stated were publicized so much in West & Asia news, even in India English msm which don’t seem to be a smearing campaign.

    Frequently we read tourists are gang raped, Indian women are gang raped with brutality or burnt to death. The higher caste men are raping lower caste without been punished, eg. Last yr news reported that two cousins were raped & haged on tree when they went outdoor to ease themselves. Their parents couldn’t get police to take action as that’s happening frequently. So father committed suicide.

    If its not rampant, why so many widespread protests & India msm publicizing which don’t benefit India image at all.

    I traveled & conduct biz in India formerly, & have some friends there. When they told me caste system still widely practised, its quite shocking for me at this age. I doubt they have anything to gain in tarnishing their own people or country.

    May be not as obvious in main city, is these rampant in smaller cities & villages?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • One day the world meet together. They decided to trumpet their own achievements.

    UK: we are industrial revolution pioneer with best English education system. We are greatest colonial power. Everyone agreed and follow. All start industrialization, learn English & colonized others.

    US: our democracy are greatest, with best innovations & finance, best uni & superior military, best petrol dollar, best 5eyes esponage, best subversion, best war mongering, best cybercrime, best opiods, best terrorism …hedgmon in a single word. Everyone agreed & follow. The world get rape endlessly since.

    Canada: we are largest land next to Russia, biggest water resources & lakes, best city to live in. Everyone agreed.

    Oz: our cities are world best ranking. Everyone agreed.

    Nz: our cattles is the most, grazing on grass & drinking stream water only. Everyone agreed.

    Japan: our industry quality is best, with most industrial people. Everyone agreed & follow.

    Germany: our precision technology is best, our cars is excellent. Everyone agreed & follow.

    France: our luxury goods & wines are the best, our fashion & arts are excellent. Everyone agreed & follow.

    Russia: our aerospace technology is best, military is excellent, largest oil & gas, biggest country, best vodka…Everyone agreed & follow.

    Switzerland: our country as a whole is best, with great finance & innovative sectors, very safe, clean & beautiful. Everyone agreed & follow. Spore aimed to be another Swiss.

    Spore: our city has most No1 rankings, No1 IQ/SAT/Maths/Science/Reading, No3 GDP(ppp) per capital, most efficient & clean, best airports, airline, best seaports, best industrial parks, best education system, best Oil&Gas offshore platform, best marine laws, most expensive city, cars, properties…Everyone agreed & follow.

    China: our country is greatest manufacturing hub, biggest markets, No1 import/export & trade partners of every country, No.1 in Agri, No1 in Hydropower, No1 in Solar/Wind/Green energy, No1 Steel producer, No1…No1…with fast ascending in technology, innovations, first Quantum, telecom 5G, AI, EV, best FSR, …No3 in military, 3rd to space walk, …we will surpass combine total of US & EU GDP by 2040.…our socialism system is showing good result…

    India: Hey hey hey, stop that, all, what so great, don’t you hear i frequently boasted India will be next Greatest Superpower surpassing China?

    All dizzying: what do you have sir, we haven’t seen a single Made In India product on our shelves so far, nor will we buy if any?

    India: we have highest growth rate of 7.5% surpassing China 6.3% after modifying many parameters, many great technologies, innovations, industrialization, I. T., service sector, call centers, biggest military shopping sprees,… the most promising land & greatest people.

    World: Like what, pls give one specific example that India is going to be greatest? Even your GDP growth miraculously stay at 7.5%, it will take 127yrs to reach China’s.

    India: Listen attentively, i shall proudly proclaimed, we have zero, nothing, nil, nada, to excel or be No1, not even sufficient toilet or electricity to go around. Only 1950′s railways. Highest corrupted system, Highest debts, lowest exports, lowest industry, highest deficit, highest 40% illiteracy, highest crimes, highest pollution, highest rapists, highest hostility to every neighbors, no resources,…biggest Demoncrapcy of 1.34B!

    World: oh…you are just a shameless liars. How can that be Greatest Superpower.

    Fukus: its true, its highly likely, we have evidence from CIA, NSA, MI6, they never lied, ask Bush, Obama, Trumps, Blair, May, Boris, Sarkosky, Macron…India will be Greatest No1 Superpower.

    India: no…no…listen world, i no shameless liar, our most talented 1.34B indians will be exported with loads of BS to you. Look at how well our people BS here in unz, in US corps, WH, Congress, everywhere.

    Don’t our most talented Nikki Harley impressed you in UN (lying) about Skirpal & Syria chemical WMD, threatening (like Indian bully) to whole world about Jerusalem US embassy…? How about many indian CEOs that sunk nearly every great corp they helmed?

    That’s our best Indians i guaranteed you will get everywhere if you give me your ruling power. I guaranteed, trust Modi, he never lied in his non awareness of Gujarat Muslim massacre, as its Chief Minister then.

    When we ruled the 5lies US, UK, Canada, Oz, Nz, with EU & Spore through WMM, invaded all South Asia & neighbours lands, we will be the biggest empire in GDP & sole hyperpower, 2nd to none! Then all your achievements will be mine. What does China count to India. We are Greatest!

    We guaranteed to make everyone great like India. Come take a look & deep sniff. If its any iota worst, we will return your land back, no question ask. Trust us, Indians never lies to lies so that our lies are not a lies.

    Everyone boots all indians back to its same shithole, India, unchanged since 1960s.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • @EliteCommInc.
    "That’s because of regional differences in the human genome. Like any widely-distributed species, ours has developed regional varieties due to local inbreeding under well-understood genetic rules: founder effect, genetic drift, natural selection. The simplest name for these varieties—the one favored by Charles Darwin, the father of modern biology—is “races.”

    But we now know that it was an incorrect term and convolutes the meaning of what it means to be a human being. One can dress the matter up in all kinds intellectual and even valid scientific garb. The reality genetically is that we are all of one race -- human race. The issue is not all that complex.

    And withing the human race there are variation in the biological, social and intellectual, emotional existence and expression of the same. All of which has been shaped over millions of years by environmental actors static and nonstatic. That Darwin and others used race to make distinctions of human hierarchy of most to least human is an issue we have inherited and are now wrestling with. It is untruthful to claim that the academic community are race denialists, though I suspect that some are.

    The issue surrounds, the meaning of the variations and for whites in particular, the suggestion that they are not in fact at the top of the pyramid via genetics. And by challenging that standard exported throughout the world and enforced with great vigor -- a lot of white people are just scared. And many in some manner of panic are racing, no pun intended, though I suppose it works, to solidify their superior status in science.

    When the issue of race is discussed, in modernity, we are not talking about genetics, we are generally discussion its social construction of meaning. And while it is convenient to hoola hoop the debate into one of science, it is a slight of hand gimmick, for the purpose of blurring the matters of question by ignoring the bridging.

    I won't ignore the bridging.

    ________________________________

    Your point . . . .

    "As we all know, a peculiar orthodoxy about human nature has come up among the Liberal Arts and Grievance Studies (LAGS) types who staff academic administrations, media, and government bureaucracies, including those that approve money grants to research scientists. A key tenet of this orthodoxy: There Is No Such Thing As Race. According to this tenet, race is a “social construct,” a sort of collective optical illusion.


    There is certainly a strange thing happening in and among academics. But the nexus of that discussion has nothing to do with race being real or not. Continuing to make that claim is to abuse the issue(s). The second aspect of the argument concerning "race" as a social construct, is not one of optical illusion save that the social implications of racial superiority has been premised on some faulty science and reasoning that on test don't play out for a myriad of reasons.


    But in all my life I have never met anyone who claimed genetics didn't matter to human existence in the real.

    And withing the human race there are variation in the biological, social and intellectual, emotional existence and expression of the same.

    And some of those variations, many of which are unevenly distributed among the various “populations,” advantage a higher or lower proportion of a given population with regard to circumstances and environments. Certain “populations” have a higher mean with regard to the variation that leads to the best chances of “success” in a given pursuit. This being reality, you can demand quotas for white sprinters or just accept the results of the race, pun intended.

    Read More
    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    The peoples on the America's survived successfully before Europeans arrived. In fact they have managed to exist successfully in spite of Europeans. The people's on the Continent have survived and son so successfully longer than the Europeans. And they both survived in periods of drought, famine, warfare, flood, earthquake, etc. And have thrived in spite of it all. They managed to develop waterways, plumbing, roads, technology without destroying the environments they thrived in.

    I think what we are beginning to understand about IQ as defined by the European mind is that it is predicated on need and desire (desire from idleness). On neither continent did the people's needs vast arrays of vaccines, though people in Africa had as practice vaccinations before encountering Europeans. On neither continent did the people's engage in killing their environments for sport as to demonstrate superiority. A practice that has thrown nearly every -- well every environment out of balance that Europeans came into contact with.

    Perhaps, the construct of IQ demonstrates the every present insecurity that Europeans are constantly trying to outrun. The incessant desire to demonstrate superiority. And yet history tells us that to be successful, one need not be superior in any manner. Perhaps, the obsession with IQ to demonstrate superiority -- is but the insecurity of a child constantly having to prove itself to the point of exhaustion. One considers the genius of national parks. When considering why they were created, one must consider how such an obvious composition could have been an oversight in developing cities in the first place.

    One considers the circular rhetorical dynamic, Europeans develop solutions to more problems that they themselves create than the environment demands they create to overcome. Perhaps that is why so many of the indigenous populations look at our heritage as one full of reckless energy that we install as intelligence. And no greater example as that of the Europeans willingness to utterly destroy for the sake of acknowledging superior status as opposed to being a success on the planet. Wiping out the buffalo/bison for profit did not end the native american populations.

    Importing immigrants is not going to save the US republic and one would think people with a successful IQ would learn that lesson from obvious hard core realities of history. Yet the people touting superior intelligence are the advocates of destructive social policies and claiming to be superior humans.


    You bet there is variation in the distribution, but how that interacts with environment or whether said distribution makes humans of this or that more successful is highly dependent on the definition and purpose of success.

    The Jellyfish it is said has successfully exists longer than humans --- as have whales, and even monkey's whether they have the ability to successfully survive humans is predicated on their ability to survive are destructive nature of the few who seem incapable of living without destroying to demonstrate their superior quality.
    , @EliteCommInc.
    one Shorter perspective of the several I posit:

    version -- mistaking muscle power for IQ is the history of European practice. During WWI, africans trained by the French were ensconced in a small french village. The villagers gradually accepted the Africans as they sought to supplement their incomes by engaging community projects and odd kibs. Initially, it was thought the africans simpletons, they spoke a very basic crude french. But eventually one women discovered that the africans had in fact been taught only rudimentary french. She took it upon herself to offer the africans the french as it was intended as language and lo and behold discovered that the blacks were in fact as sophisticated a people as those in the village and they adopted general french linguistics which they mastered as well or better than many french themselves.

    It was uncovered that the french deliberately denied teaching the language in full so as to maintain a superior status. The US refused to permit black US troops to fight along side their US brothers in arms. They assigned them to the French, who discovers that the blacks were as sophisticated humans as themselves. equal to or superior in bravery. And when they began awarding blacks medals for the same, the US military demanded they refrain from doing so -- l'est they begin seeing themselves as equals.


    It is deeply embarrassing to visit a plantation only discover the unacknowledged technology that blacks brought to building technique (s), purposefulness and architectural design. It is the uncovering of the manipulation on mass scale that whites in power - have engaged to delimit knowledge about the intelligence of others. To ignore that is to miss the dilemma concerning the distribution of IQ.


    Power is not by definition linked to IQ.

    , @EliteCommInc.
    that variations deposited in varying degrees withing the human species among various groups of humans


    Saying

    "duh"

    seemed a bit trite.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Does Prof. Reich really expect males from that second group to “embrace” their annihilation?

    Yeah, Bruce Lee kicked Derb's ass but he still ran off with a Chinese girl.

    Derb is the Über Mensch, he will always prevail.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • My gymnasium professor at gymnasium told us about a friend of his, also a scientist, deeply religious.
    This friend had said to him ‘there are two compartments in my head, one scientific, the other religious, I hope the wall between will never break trough’.
    Maybe the scientific part of the mentioned book, and the ideological part, are the result of a break through.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • and to any other indians here too.. stop commenting unless you say all indian men are sh*t.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous[725] • Disclaimer says:

    I beginning to get the feeling that the more indians say all of them are not rapists or defend themselves against allegations of stupidity or something, the more some of them will say they are. And some of them will even accuse them of raping their sisters, daughters, young girls and boys, animals, babies.

    You want to hear us telling we are all rapists right? Okay we are all rapists we rape everybody and everything. We also dumbasses, dregs.

    I am signing off. Dagon i think you should stop commenting too. Unless you want to be accused of raping babies and animals too. Let them think or say whatever they want about indians. They are not wrong, we are like that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • @Disordered
    To be fair, Christians also had that old Paul quote about "being kind to your slave", and the ideas of the guy who opposed Bartolome de las Casas in effectively arguing for race realism in Spain. That debate was won by the encomienda owners of Amerindians, to be fair; but even then the philosophical feeling of the Colonia caste system being good did not start to change until the Enlightenment reached the Spanish Bourbons and they started liberalizing - Napoleon's invasion was the other spark that set off the Latin American independence movements. So perhaps Christians are not to blame always for their cheek-turning, at least not in continental Europe as much as the more faith-based abolitionist movement in Northern Europe and the Anglosphere.

    Even then, you could say Christianity was integration-friendly originally, what with being born in the multi-culti milieu of the Roman empire that had just squashed the nation in which the Messiah was just killed. But precisely because later the papacy inherited the purple mantle of philosophical leader of the West, he in effect led the defense of the West alongside the monarchs he validated in their divine right. When the papacy in turn became full of institutional corruption and lost its immaculate moral power, the aforementioned Caesars recovered the mantle of defending their nations/races - the thing is, this in effect split the West (and whites really) into conflicting national interests, including imperial colonization of other peoples for power and money that eventually comes back to bite us (the Roman influence was too strong in this sense). Which wouldn't be a bad thing in theory, if the ultimate resolution of major Western national interests in 1945 didn't involve a complete reversal of roles, which has devolved into the current cuckery. Considering that by then most Western intellectuals believed in Marx more than in Jesus, we cannot entirely blame said cuckery on the Nazorean. "Turning the other cheek" has certainly had good and bad results (usually the interpreter forgets that turning the other cheek means not backing out, and was used in a religious sense), same as "needle through camel's eye"... lest we forget, however, how he mentioned "coming to bring a sword" and being "zealous for His Father[land]'s house"... a true and honest evaluation of Christianity would acknowledge that Christ was more complex than the one icon of the Lamb, and therefore his followers shouldn't be sheep...

    The inability of humanity to think out of the box and to adopt new ideas are functions of the experience of the individual and the restrictions of the societies that the individual respects and not much else. The ability to use actual experience and transferred experience is genetically controlled, but access to experience is environmentally dictated and politically controlled. A society changes as a critical mass of similar thoughts are allowed or occur.

    Propaganda specific to the society and links to the inner close family, the school, its instructors, and media icons all add inputs that determine much of the ability of a human to entertain and to present outside of the culture restricted box.

    One need look no further than the information expansive capacities of the Internet to see the impact of a broader view of the world.

    What I see coming is the intelligent robot.. as that robot acquires experience and broadens its capacity to relate that experience to immediate need and cloud type thoughts many things are going to change. Robots have genes just the same as do humans; robotic gene sets are found in the software routines or hardware switches that compose its operating systems, just as genes and gene sets are software routines or hardware switches that control experience determined human response to environment.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • Anonymous[248] • Disclaimer says:

    I dont disgaree with most of what you said, but then you say something like this:

    ”The world simply must stop Indians invasion through mass migration, and send every single one back to where they are, India. Then you Great people can help build Great India there with more civilize living condition starting from basic sanitary & stop rampant violent rapes on your own sisters & daughters.”

    More than 99.9999 or probably even more of Indians who never raped their daughter or sister or dogs or cats or babies or young boys and if some among them who comes to the west to make a honest living, should go back and stop raping his sisters and daughters and build toilets? Are you saying they should not rape when they didnt rape to begin with? and also build toilets for others. Building toilets needs a lot of govt permissions like everywhere. The water and sewege supply boards needs to give clearance. So how will an avg indian build toilets for people who dont have it? Also there are toilets in india. Do you really think they are none? While a lot of people still dont have access to toilets, they are getting there.

    If you dont want indians to come to the west fine, but dont say stuff like that just because they came to the west or defended themselves when somebody called them idiots or rapists or implied them as evil. A few cousins of mine are in the west and they make a honest living and they are not rapists of other women or their sisters or daughters or anybody.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon

    Then you Great people can help build Great India there with more civilize living condition starting from basic sanitary & stop rampant violent rapes on your own sisters & daughters.
     
    You misunderstood. I means "Protect your own sisters & daughters from violent rape. "

    More than 99.9999 or probably even more of Indians who never raped their daughter or sister or dogs or cats or babies or young boys
     
    Are you saying violent rape or incest is rare in India at 0.0001%? Then India is safer than the whole world.

    Even in many West developed countries that happen, UK is capital of paedophiles. British never deny like Indians did. US too, rape is not uncommon, so are China, Japan, Korea, Asia & elsewhere. Indonesia has animals like hens been raped till death. Cat is quite a challenge, haven't heard, dog yes.

    But India seem very severe with common news going around the world, are they fake?

    So how will an avg indian build toilets for people who dont have it? Also there are toilets in india. Do you really think they are none? While a lot of people still dont have access to toilets, they are getting there.
     
    Yes, they should return to help campaign gov for sanitary, with proper sewage system. This is very important to protect country water sources, hygiene, and dignity of people.

    China did a great effort after understanding that. 20yrs ago, even in some tourist area, toilet has no door. No more. Myanmar gov is doing very good progress, South East Asia overall is improving well. Even those on India aids list, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Mauritius were ok in my travel.

    But India, most deplorable. In cities, road side toilet is only a wall, urines are flowing everywhere. Even in busy public area, people just squat & ease, no one feel ashamed. Its reported at least 40% has no toilet access. And i did that too outdoor in India, where else? Even in train station platform, the track is toilet, where women are walking around.

    If others under India aids can do, so can India do so by buying less useless weapons of $10Billions. Unlike others, all my posting never insult India has no toilet access, but merely pointed out the fact, India still got so much to do before boasting as another great nation or superpower.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • That past is interesting, but its the future that some have planned for us Caucasians that will be dismal.
    In a hundred years, no one will be looking back and asking what happened.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • @Talha

    it just doesn’t jive!
     
    Don't get me wrong - the West is not paradise by any measure. Having lived in various parts of America (and my wife is a family/marriage counselor), I can guarantee you it is not. It is materially advanced - that is just an objective metric.

    If it was paradise, then most Western countries wouldn't have suicide rates far above places like Jordan, Algeria and the Philippines.

    A society can make hell out of shiny lights, cool gadgets, clean streets and on-demand sex.

    Peace.

    Material advancement is not a sine qua non of public hygiene. I have traveled in some fairly poor countries – all of which were significantly cleaner than India.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha

    Material advancement is not a sine qua non of public hygiene
     
    .
    Completely agree. My comment was simply about lack of a functional sewer system and running water. I know people that have traveled through some of the toughest parts of the third world in Muslim areas. The people there might be poor, but they keep up with the rules of ritual purity and hygiene.

    In fact, they would never think about not washing their hands after using the restroom - something I've seen people do in our office restroom time and time again; I think women might be better about this, but plenty of men seem to have an aversion to washing their hands.

    I never touch the door handle in those places without a paper towel.

    cleaner than India
     
    I wonder if this has to do with the caste system which has gradations based on levels of purity - the bottom being those that are not expected to have the same level of purity as the few at the top. I'm no expert on this subject, but this paper seems to imply that is one of the issues at the root:
    "This chapter limits itself to a discussion of the role played by caste and untouchability in severely constraining the sustainability of sanitation programmes in India. We are not arguing that this is the only challenge facing programmes such as CLTS in India, but reducing OD in India would be impossible without understanding and challenging notions of purity and pollution which prevent Indians from adopting and using latrines."
    https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/web.sas.upenn.edu/dist/1/140/files/2016/06/CHAPTER-17_-Purity-pollution-and-untouchability_-1r06ybb.pdf

    There is no same stratification in, say, Muslim cultures where the poor and the rich are expected to maintain the same rules of hygiene and ritual purity.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Dagon Shield
    You made the Paki laugh at least... India, as you most likely feel, is a place where shit happens but in the US of A and New York City at that... it's all relative. Clean up your own ass first before pointing that muddy finger at others!

    Posting angry responses doesn’t change the fact that India is a very dirty country with a poor sense of public hygiene and civic responsibility.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon[107] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    Yup exactly.

    The reason every Indian thread derails is because Indians would rather play games and not confront hard truths.

    India has enough smart people to be a competent country, but their entire existence seems to be pretty and immature.

    North Indian civilization is older than China, sure it got lot of smart wise people to make India on par with China. I have met some humble & wise Indians like good Chinese or whites thinkers with virtue, but they will never survive in India corrupted system.

    When you travel to upper north like Himacha Pradesh, you can see totally different Indians. They are tall fair skin, polite and smart generally. They respected life so much that most are vegetarian. Even old bulls unable to plough are left to graze in wild. Quite crimes free & amazing clean with pines forest & greenery. Even not rich, life is simple & clean.

    Their gentle manner & honesty make us visitors felt shameful when we occassionally tried to throw some supremacy or attempt to outwit them for better deals.

    And tourists from other part of India are seemed wealthy & peaceful lot, well behave. Totally different from dusty filthy Middle, Southern parts & cities filled with stinking sewage & crimes.

    Their corrupted ruling caste & unfitting demoncraptic system are ruined entire country. The abled wealthy ones simply left for better pastures, leaving the poors & uneducated to rot. Education is so bad that their school textbooks are riddled with mistakes if you tried read one.

    Now their gov is trying to export their (semi-skilled cheaters) top 20% or 268M to the world under disguise of IT talents to ruin the world.

    Try visit, you will find there is simply nothing inside India, not even reliable electricity & water supply, no real industry, no real R&D & innovation, a boasting failed military industry, no valuable service industry except poor call centers with fake US accents but retard technical support. Its worst than SEAsia country. Not even Walmart can open. Banks are so untrustable with fake LC full of cheats that advanced payment is mandatory for business.

    They only have one great thing, 1.34B of majority illiterate poor people, interwoven with violent rapists & cheats. Ask every decent Indians, they will readily tell you how they despise their shameless country folks that lied & steal habitually, many are drunkard.

    Of course there are always some exceptional good ones, may be top 1%(13.4M) that are flooding the world with mixture of top 10%(134M) scoundrels, trying to dominate other countries now.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous[264] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    Of course not all Indian men are rapists. Nice straw man argument.

    But, it's clear that India still has a very primitive view on tape. And that there are a lot of Indians who are not bothered much by little girls getting gang raped, something that is universally abhorred in civilized society.

    You said this: ”Your appalling language says a lot about Indian men’s attitude towards women — utter disrespect.”.

    To which i replied, good job assuming all indian men as evil or r*pists.

    ”But, it’s clear that India still has a very primitive view on tape. And that there are a lot of Indians who are not bothered much by little girls getting gang rap*d, something that is universally abhorred in civilized society.”

    A lot of indians protested many many times on the streets. What else should they have done? Should they have lynched the rap*st on the street. I dont disgree with it, but do you really think it is possible to happen?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous[348] • Disclaimer says:
    @TT
    And they have penchant for raping babies too if you read their news. Caste system is still so widespread, if a woman meet lower caste men, the man is killed & his sisters raped as punishment. That high caste woman, is sometimes gang raped for weeks by their caste leaders, a group of their wise very old men. They said its a punishment & sex education to cleanse a horny woman.

    Just search abit you can get tonnes of India rape news. Its out of control, and police will punish complainants for a little bribe, court took decades to hear, culprits burned the victims & her family. Victims are ordered to marry their rapist as settlement.

    Its a higher caste privilege to rape low caste. Most Indians know.

    Even dogs are not spared, a Indian security guard was caught after people find him always lock himself inside with the guard dog, which groaning in painful swollen ass.

    The society is simply sickened with poverty & illiteracy, Hindu caste system & rampant corruption, spiraling a great civilization to a cesspool. Yet indians here are still trying to sell Indian snake oil & export their problem out instead of trying to improve their country.

    ”Its a higher caste privilege to rape low caste. Most Indians know.”

    I am a higher caste person and no such thing exists. And the rest of your comment is filled with so many extreme exaggerations. A few people do that and you accuse all the millions of the people of the caste and hundreds of millions of the country.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TT
    It will be Good if you can help clarify. All i have stated were publicized so much in West & Asia news, even in India English msm which don't seem to be a smearing campaign.

    Frequently we read tourists are gang raped, Indian women are gang raped with brutality or burnt to death. The higher caste men are raping lower caste without been punished, eg. Last yr news reported that two cousins were raped & haged on tree when they went outdoor to ease themselves. Their parents couldn't get police to take action as that's happening frequently. So father committed suicide.

    If its not rampant, why so many widespread protests & India msm publicizing which don't benefit India image at all.

    I traveled & conduct biz in India formerly, & have some friends there. When they told me caste system still widely practised, its quite shocking for me at this age. I doubt they have anything to gain in tarnishing their own people or country.

    May be not as obvious in main city, is these rampant in smaller cities & villages?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous[348] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    Of course not all Indian men are rapists. Nice straw man argument.

    But, it's clear that India still has a very primitive view on tape. And that there are a lot of Indians who are not bothered much by little girls getting gang raped, something that is universally abhorred in civilized society.

    You said this : ”Your appalling language says a lot about Indian men’s attitude towards women — utter disrespect.”

    to which i replied good job assuming all indian men are evil or rapists.

    ”But, it’s clear that India still has a very primitive view on tape. And that there are a lot of Indians who are not bothered much by little girls getting gang raped, something that is universally abhorred in civilized society.”

    They protested many times on the streets. What else can they do? Are you asking for average people to lynch the rapist on the street?. This is dont disagree with, but do you really think this is possible to happen?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon[107] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dagon Shield
    I remember being in the deep woods of Missouri once with a white friend, a good working man, in a moment of enlightenment he said to me, you think all white people are good and smart but I want to take you a country place where you will see real America. Lo and behold, we end up in a honky-tonk at late night with no lights outside for miles. A roaring place with loud but good country music band and a sea of lily white faces. Something out of a Hollywood film... exciting but scary. He took me to a table of his friends and introduced me as a friend. All were polite but one refused shake my hand and the hatred he felt towards me and the disappointment in his kin for bringing me there was palpable. At times it seemed that the whole place,with at least a few hundred people, was staring at me. It was a bit scary and unsettling. Needless to say, we didn't stay too long to enjoy ourselves. You said Ihad guts... well after that night, fear is a commodity i don't traffic in. So, I defend what I believe to be right, albeit not to orther peoples liking. There is no turning back!

    I said you have guts because you actually speak as a Indian, unlike those like Thomm pretending to be whites shamelessly.

    But you are too hostile & not able to reason out even been given facts. That make you a very bad example of Indian, like a typical Indian scoundrel most Indians also hated.

    There was once a Indian using Malla as handle, he defended India veraciouly, backing with facts. When been corrected of India faults, he always readily accepted gracefully. He even notified us the truth like India invaded China, South Tibet, etc.

    This is what make a Indian respectable, that we enjoyed debating and find out mutual problems. Individually none of us is responsible for all these shits created by our corrupted politicians & historical burden, but to lied shamelessly like some Indians here trying to distort facts are unforgivable fault.

    So pls stop continue to tarnish Indian name with such bad behavior when its already so notorious. Even the last few good indians are buried. The world don’t want to see more such Indians coming to our countries to destroy our prosperity & peace, no matter how intelligent they are, because they are crafty scoundrel.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @TT
    And they have penchant for raping babies too if you read their news. Caste system is still so widespread, if a woman meet lower caste men, the man is killed & his sisters raped as punishment. That high caste woman, is sometimes gang raped for weeks by their caste leaders, a group of their wise very old men. They said its a punishment & sex education to cleanse a horny woman.

    Just search abit you can get tonnes of India rape news. Its out of control, and police will punish complainants for a little bribe, court took decades to hear, culprits burned the victims & her family. Victims are ordered to marry their rapist as settlement.

    Its a higher caste privilege to rape low caste. Most Indians know.

    Even dogs are not spared, a Indian security guard was caught after people find him always lock himself inside with the guard dog, which groaning in painful swollen ass.

    The society is simply sickened with poverty & illiteracy, Hindu caste system & rampant corruption, spiraling a great civilization to a cesspool. Yet indians here are still trying to sell Indian snake oil & export their problem out instead of trying to improve their country.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TT
    Pls provide your source website, not tweet.

    Do you have a world charts, including India, SK, Jp, Spore, US, UK, Sweden, Belgium, Oz, Nz, South Africa, Latin America for comparison for this so called UN Multi country survey source?

    I bet you don't in this propaganda data. Only a few countries are quoted so suspiciously, yet nothing mention on the top10 highest rape ranking occupied by Western countries & India, very strange isn't it?

    According to your chart, China 22.7%=317M rapists. So majority women would have been raped by now. Yet China crime rate is so low in ranking, safer than almost all West including US, UK, Canada, Oz, Nz, Norway, Sweden. India is also safer than most West.

    http://bewitter.com/countries-with-highest-rape-crime-in-the-world-2017/amp/
    2017 Highest Rape Crimes
    1. SAfrica 500k, 2. Sweden 6.6k 3. US 293K 4. UK 85k 5. India 33k 6. Canada 460k 7. NZ 8. Oz 9. Denmark 10. Zimbabwe

    https://www.trendrr.net/13049/countries-with-highest-rape-crime-famous-global-statistics/
    2017 Rape by 100,000 p. a.
    1. South Africa 4. Sweden, 7. Australia,10. Belgium, 11.US

    Wiki:
    China rape case is 33K p. a. out of 1400M, negligible per 100K.

    US 290K rape out of 340M, that will required ?% US men to be rapist if 20% of Chinese men are rapist?

    Consider China rated so much lower than all west in rape per 100k, with so much lower crime rate, that will required all West to be ~80% been rapist? Your chart is mere nonsense, absurd at best.

    https://www.numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp?title=2017
    2017 Crime index
    China is bottom of crime rating, the lower, the better.
    2. PapuaNG
    5. South Africa
    14. Bangladesh
    48. Indonesia
    53. US
    58. Sweden
    61. Norway
    66. India
    69. Oz
    70. UK
    78. Canada
    79. Nz
    91. Sri Lanka
    92. China

    Wiki said China is having very low 31.8K rape per year, that will take 9400yrs for Chinese to accomplish the feat of 300M rapist even they just doing once.

    PNG 60% rapist, what kind of nonsense?

    http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Rape-rate
    Rape rate per 100K
    India ranked lower than all west &:Spore. So are we wrong about India?

    1. South Africa 6. Sweden 11. Oz, 13. Belgium, 14. US, 16. Nz 24. Norway, 27. France, 29. Finland, 30. SK 82. Spore, 94. India, 97. Canada, 98. HK, 107. Syria, Yemen, Lebanon, 118. Egypt…
    China wasn't rated.

    https://knoema.com/atlas/topics/Crime-Statistics/Assaults-Kidnapping-Robbery-Sexual-Rape/Rape?mode=amp

    The United States of America is the top country by rape in the world. As of 2015, rape in the United States of America was 124,047 that accounts for 52.93 % of the world's rape. The top 5 countries (others are Mexico, Colombia, France, and Peru) account for 74.90 % of it. The world's total rape was estimated at 234,354 in 2015.
     
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics

    such as South Africa having 500,000 rapes per year,[15] China having 31,833 rapes a year,[16] Egypt having more than 200,000 rapes a year,[17] and the United Kingdom at 85,000 rapes a year.[18]
     
    Conclusion:

    India is a safe Haven compare to all West in rape crimes, esp the Top 10 rapist countries, 5lies US, UK, Canada, Oz, Nz. We have simply misunderstood India! Or most rape crimes wasn't reported?

    The most rapist countries are actually the WEST!!!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    I’m always inviting everyone to Islam; it’s the best use of my time. You think I’m here to banter about with people I don’t know regarding politics as if it’s the greatest thing on earth? I have four kids, I’ve got way better things to do with my time, don’t you?

    Peace.

    I have four kids, I’ve got way better things to do with my time

    You seem to spend more time here sucking up to alt-right racists than with your kids.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Thanks for more of your opinions.

    sucking up to alt-right
     
    It should be clear to anybody here, I'm not interested in becoming their "wing man" and I'm not interested in begging them to accept me or let me stay in the West. I'm preesenting them a solution to their problem; a solution that will require them to re-calibrate their understanding of how to relate to the question of race and how to prioritize it in the hierarchy of purpose.

    If they don't like the solution, they are welcome to look for others - no skin off my back.

    I certainly won't be spending time sucking up to the Left, as Dr. Shadee Elmasry wisely distilled their positions:
    https://twitter.com/DrShadeeElmasry/status/985253266941505538
    https://twitter.com/DrShadeeElmasry/status/985254450926440448

    than with your kids
     
    First, why not get married have a few kids 3-4 and then balance work with driving them back and forth from this/that practice, helping with their homework, dedicating your weekend to keeping them busy and happy going to the Y for swimming, BJJ classes, etc. - then I'll give your advice any weight. So...how many kids do you have again?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thomm

    However, admit that comparatively speaking the US states that are more than >90% White are also shitholes. West Virginia, Kentucky, Kansas, not to mention all the flyover countries in the middle where no immigrant wants to go.
     
    That isn't true. The worst parts of the US are always specifically where blacks concentrate. Black, unsurprisingly, are the most Democrat-voting group of all.

    White Trashionalists are just as bad as blacks, but they are never concentrated in one place. Whites who are simply rural and poor are not 'trash'. Impressive white parents can still produce a waste-matter offspring.


    The biggest group in Massachusetts are the Irish, who once were considered non-White. The second largest ethnic group are Italians, who again were considered non-White at one point in time.
     
    This IS true, yes. The definition of 'white' keeps expanding.

    The worst parts of the US are still better than the best parts of India in most ways: they have reliable electricity, water supply, food supply, garbage collection, schools for everyone, medical care etc.

    Boastful indians like you are probably the most shameless people on the planet.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm
    I didn't mention India in that comment at all (not am I an Indian). You meant to reply to 'South Asian'.

    It takes a negro level of stupid to get something that basic wrong.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @JohnnyWalker123
    Chinese in Ethiopia.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx14W62hB7M

    Chinese in Ethiopia.

    Wow. Sounds good, looks good. Great discipline and harmony. Things are looking up for Africa.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @JohnnyWalker123
    Interesting.

    Could you write about your experiences with Eastern Euro, Asian/Chinese, Indian subcontinental, and Whites in the work place?

    I've noticed certain differences among these groups and would be interested in seeing what you think.

    Well, it does depend on the individual. But my general experience is that Indians tend to be highly nepotistic and power-seeking(I’ve written once before about an insanely company-destroying scheme one ran; they can be unbelievably toxic), American whites tend to be honest and well-rounded, Russians to be highly skilled and focused if generally dissatisfied with everything around them, and Chinese to be skillful but have an annoying tendency to slack off right at the end(I call it “doing it 90%”, but quite often, being lazy about the 10% gives them a terrible reputation).

    I suppose I’ve been hard on Indians so much that I should mention one really impressive case I knew. This was a guy who was an insanely dedicated PHP programmer, extremely good and very talented in every way. He was so unambitious that in spite of his skills which clearly merited over 6 digits, he was happy only ever making $20 or so an hour, taking the train and reading a book every day while sharing an apartment with three other guys. So in most ways, he was contrary to the usual expectations, but I did feel rather sad for him because he really did just seem to want to be a slave and nothing else.

    Its just generalities, though.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JohnnyWalker123
    If you had to compare American corporate managers to Chinese corporate managers, what would you say are the similarities and differences?

    My general sense is that the Chinese like to promote workers with "hard" technical skills into management. American corporate culture (outside of the software industry) seems more amenable to promoting people who are socially adept or good at bull5hitting. These are (of course) generalizations and there are plenty of competent American managers, but I think Corporate America places more emphasis on being verbally facile. I think that might explain some of the differences between the American and Chinese economies.

    It seems like the ambition of the average Chinese kid is to study engineering at Tsinghua and then open a factory to produce something of value. The ambition of the average American kid (when he's not dreaming of being a rapper or celebrity) is to have some sort of BS job like "corporate social media director." The more above-average American kids prefer profesisons like law or finance. American seem to disdain acquiring "hard" skills and doing real work, instead preferring jobs in which there's a lot of talking and self-promoting.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Dagon Shield
    You put so much into your posts and coynters that I feel at a loss to retort but I'll try...

    To pin it on the horse of atheism doesn't seem fair. Zoroastrians, a group unknown to most, have managed to bring down their numbers to abysmal levels notwithstanding their religious convictions and wherewithal to maintain their lot in good stead to boot. And non-orthodox Ashkenazi seem to be following in the same path... perhaps real education plays the part.

    Don't misunderstand me, I like Bantus but could they be as inventive as the Swede? I would bet that you would have a better chance of convincing a Scandinavian to alter his behavior to save the planet than to stop a Bantu from destroying his paradise, today.

    The operative word in the third para is millions not billions... it may have gone too far to salvage it with mere millions... just saying.

    Georgia is good and Georgians are better-just look at Sophie Shavernadze-but can it be done in Austria? I do appreciate Mozart...

    To pin it on the horse of atheism doesn’t seem fair.

    It’s not just atheism (though the seem to be in the lead by being behind everyone) – it’s anybody that signs onto post-modern values. Muslims are not immune; those Muslims who live La Vida Dolce also don’t have many kids – if any.

    Religion is one of those things that you don’t just give lip service to; if all you do is call yourself something, but don’t live by the principles then you derive no benefits. The Great Human Culling is at hand, some people seem eager to no longer have their genes part of the human enterprise – their call.

    Don’t misunderstand me, I like Bantus but could they be as inventive as the Swede?

    I agree, but from the perspective of the Earth (which is what I was talking about) – why should it care? The Swede certainly does – but he is obviously biased. The Swede is a far greater drain on resources – probably uses as much per year as half a small Bantu village. I like Swedes, my wife is from Swedish background and I have a bunch of in-laws there – I seem to want them to stick around more than they themselves do, again not many kids among the lot of her cousins and the ones that do have a kid are not married. I’m simply talking about objective metrics here.

    but can it be done in Austria?

    Not sure – the article makes it clear that this may only work in places where religion is already felt as a presence. The Orthodox church in Georgia seems to be playing that role.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • How do regular Sunnis see this? A success, a failure or what?

    I cannot arrogate myself to speak on behalf of all Sunnis. I can only speak of the ones I am most familiar with – traditional ones and even more moderate minded ones are not happy with Saudi, that’s being generous. Saudi has not only helped destroy Syria but has caused a humanitarian crisis in Yemen.

    That said, I don’t know of a single Sunni in my circle who likes the Assad regime. Many of them, like myself feel his saving grace is that the people who would replace him after the civil war are even worse.

    My personal go to person on these matters is Shaykh Muhammad Yaqoubi who is a traditional scholar (and Sufi shaykh) in exile in Moroccco. He is very out-spoken about the damage done by Saudis to the Muslim world, yet is also against the Assad regime. He spoke out against the regime early on and had to leave the country, however – as early as 2015 he was stating publicly; ” continuing the fight is no longer in the interest of Syrians.”

    Thus, the way I see it (based on his opinion and the various comments I see from Sunni Muslims); the fighting needs should stop as soon as it can and a political solution needs to be arrived at with the major players at the table; including people who have a serious stake in the matter like Iran, Iraq, Russia, Turkey, Jordan, etc.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    Thus, the way I see it (based on his opinion and the various comments I see from Sunni Muslims); the fighting needs should stop as soon as it can and a political solution needs to be arrived at with the major players at the table; including people who have a serious stake in the matter like Iran, Iraq, Russia, Turkey, Jordan, etc.
     
    Thanks for your informed opinion. These things are not so clear looking from the outside, and Western reporting seems to be mostly useless.

    So the problem are the Israelis/US/Saudis who are pushing wars more than the Sunnis or Shias themselves.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • @Anon
    There is no one peaceful nation not afraid of Christianity crusade heaping havoc with violent killing. But they fear the Muslims Islam Jihadist, who believe their terrorism is God blessed with virgins awaiting, spreading their religion by multiplying with uncontrolled births polygamy.

    Pls stop selling your Islam like Christian missionary.

    Yet the Hindu extremists beat the Muslims up side down traditionally, slaughtering thousands in Modi's state Gujarat. And that genocidal help Modi won landslide elections for his heroic acts . Coincidentally, Gujarat is also the place Thorfinnson has a pad, a legit white man business in India he asked us to believe.

    But they fear the Muslims Islam Jihadist, who believe their terrorism is God blessed with virgins awaiting

    I fear those guys too. You can talk sense into some of them, but many of them are too deep into the muck to be able to pull them out of. Muslims, by far are the majority targets of these people – so we know the problem far too well. Here are the names and stats of the number of people killed in attacks of the mausoleums of Sufi shaykhs in Pakistan:

    https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/interactive/2017/02/attack-shrines-pakistan-2005-170219181655660.html

    spreading their religion by multiplying with uncontrolled births

    Yeah, we have kids – that’s a feature not a bug. People who convert to Islam also tend to have families with kids. Maybe you don’t like kids – that’s not our problem – feel free not to have any and encourage your friends not to have any.

    polygamy

    In some cultures it’s common for people to have more than one wife – what business is it of yours if they aren’t bothering you in their countries? They get to have more kids you get to make fun of them at cocktail parties with your unmarried friends; both sides benefit. Please, laugh it up at our expense:

    I get it if it comes down to Muslims trying to have polygamous marriages in the West; simply make it illegal and enforce the law.

    Pls stop selling your Islam like Christian missionary.

    Sure, I’ll knock it off if your name is Ron Unz – is it? Otherwise there is a button for “ignore commenter”, please use it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mark green
    Hi Talha. I always enjoy your comments, even when I don't totally agree with you (though I generally do). You are courteous, upbeat, honest and patient. You set a very good example here. Nice work!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @KenH

    And what happens when the majority of whites in those nations directly oppose the Alt Right’s jackboots of nationalism for only white people?
     
    And how about the left's jackbooted fascism that holds that America belongs to every racial group except whites and especially whites who don't hate themselves? How come you never speak out against that bigotry? Hint: because to you and other lefties that's a righteous and noble hate and bigotry.

    Do not these whites have the freedom to association to include non-whites as being “their own people” and “one of them”?
     
    If you put your thinking cap on you'd see that most of the diversity worshipping white and (((white))) leftists you look to for guidance live in whitetopias and rarely choose to associate with non-whites. Somehow I doubt most of these people will freely choose to live in the equivalent of Detroit or San Paulo, Brazil, but if that's what you all wish then more power to you and them if you're really true believers in the cult of "muh diversity".

    I would venture you fortunately lack the guile and gumption to engage in such action. St. Breivik, you are not.
     
    According to what your crystal ball? I'll do what is necessary to protect me, my friends and family and my people. I don't need to beat my chest and act tough or tell you what my plans are. I'd venture that if and when that day ever comes the prospect of tens of thousands of heavily armed and pissed off white men will give you and other lefties the worst case of diarrhea in history.

    Indeed, in this context, Patrick is right when he says “as we have ceased to be a moral and religious people”.
     
    Are you auditioning for the late Rev. Billy Graham's job?

    “And how about the left’s jackbooted fascism that holds that America belongs to every racial group except whites…”

    Which is patently false. First, you are absolutely misapplying the concept “fascism” here, which means “a form of radical authoritarian nationalism, characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and control of industry and commerce.” The United States is not a fascist government, contrary to your tinfoil hattery. Second, America doesn’t “belong” to any one racial or ethnic group. It consists of citizens, including whites, who have not been excluded in being part of the body politic or social fabric. You have a knack for wild generalizations. Third, whites have every liberty to form their own groups. It is just that not all white people are on board with the groups that YOU want to form or be part of. Which is their freedom of association to oppose.

    “and especially whites who don’t hate themselves?”

    In your world, whites hate themselves only if they do not conform to your belief system. Which, if you truly think about it, is ridiculous. White Americans are not monolithic. They belong to a number of groups, and love their membership in those groups. They need not be virtue signaled to death by your insistence that they only love themselves if they look out for all whites.

    “How come you never speak out against that bigotry? Hint: because to you and other lefties that’s a righteous and noble hate and bigotry.”

    Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture. Again, do whites have the freedom of association to choose to include non-whites in their groups, and to marry and procreate with those groups? Why or why not?

    “If you put your thinking cap on you’d see that most of the diversity worshipping white and (((white))) leftists you look to for guidance live in whitetopias and rarely choose to associate with non-whites.”

    It is a matter of economics here, not race. Upper-class people want to live in nice places, regardless of race or ethnicity. That is their liberty. It is reasonable and sensible for well-off folks to live in well-off places next to people who are also well-off. Again, it’s about finances. Moreover, white people who live in such areas interact with non-whites on a day to day basis, whether it be at work or at play. You either don’t see it, or if you do see it, you don’t want to see it.

    “Somehow I doubt most of these people will freely choose to live in the equivalent of Detroit or San Paulo, Brazil, but if that’s what you all wish then more power to you and them if you’re really true believers in the cult of “muh diversity”.”

    There is no cult here of diversity, just people from different races and ethnicities who choose to interact with one another. That is called being human.

    Now, regarding Detroit, there are a host of reasons for the downfall of that city other than racial matters. Would you like to know more, citizen, and become educated on the matter?

    According to what your crystal ball? I’ll do what is necessary to protect me, my friends and family and my people.”

    Your people are white Americans, which includes me.

    “I’d venture that if and when that day ever comes the prospect of tens of thousands of heavily armed and pissed off white men will give you and other lefties the worst case of diarrhea in history.”

    That is all fantasy, my friend. If there is this invasion that already has taken place in the States, and whites are about to become extinct, you choosing not to lift a finger now to do something about it tells me everything I need to know.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    " ... whites have every liberty to form their own groups. "

    Not really. If a group of whites publicly professed in-group preference and wanted to coalesce around identitarian issues, white sjw Stalinists would move quickly, primarily on social media, to stigmatize such a group. Especially if said group was more serious than Richard Spencer's cavalcade of gay Nazi camp.

    "Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture."

    I will assume you're being sincere: Apparently, you don't follow trends. The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint or be doxxed, which will be followed by economic marginalization.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • Anonymous[363] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon
    The article isn’t about Indians in the UK.

    It’s about Indians in America so your comment is pointless and stupid.

    The two different groups have very different goals. The UK Indians want a more pro business government. So they are conservative.

    Indians in America want more discrimination against American Whites and more affirmative action opportunities for blacks Browns tans and yellows.

    Two different populations, two different goals.

    Indians in Britain support the Conservatives because Labour is the party of Muslims (and has been since the Attlee government created Pakistan in 1947). It’s a tribal thing, not about economics.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @dfordoom

    In this context the French revolution was a reaction against excessive taxation and their exploitative aristocracy.
     
    I think you may be making the mistake of seeing the French Revolution as a spontaneous uprising of the oppressed masses. Most of the revolutions of the 17th and 18th centuries were uprisings of the increasingly powerful and wealthy middle classes who weren't exploited or oppressed but who saw the chance of looting the aristocracy. The poor old huddled masses usually weren't consulted and were either exploited by the revolutionaries or were hostile to the revolution.

    It's usually not the genuinely downtrodden who revolt. It's usually a rising new elite trying to displace the old elite.

    I think you may be making the mistake of seeing the French Revolution as a spontaneous uprising of the oppressed masses. Most of the revolutions of the 17th and 18th centuries were uprisings of the increasingly powerful and wealthy middle classes who weren’t exploited or oppressed but who saw the chance of looting the aristocracy.

    Who was looting who? As background, my view is that aristocracies have to earn their position a national leaders. Early on it was quite straightforward, and usually on the battlefield, for example John Churchill, the 1st Duke of Marlborough:

    His leadership of the allied armies consolidated Britain’s emergence as a front-rank power. He successfully maintained unity among the allies, thereby demonstrating his diplomatic skills. Throughout ten consecutive campaigns during the Spanish Succession war, Marlborough held together a discordant coalition through his sheer force of personality and raised the standing of British arms to a level not known since the Middle Ages. Although in the end he could not compel total capitulation from his enemies, his victories allowed Britain to rise from a minor to a major power, ensuring the country’s growing prosperity throughout the 18th century.

    Wikipedia.

    But by the “Belle Epoque” 1871-1914 European aristocracies were a useless decadent elite.

    I would connect the rise in power of the commercial middle classes and industrialists to the Industrial Revolution. They were contributing more and wanted political power, and they got it through their money and democracy (actually allied with the old aristocracy) with the downside of the not so welcome growth of a politically aware working class.

    For me this was the start of a classic problem that still hasn’t been resolved. The commercial and industrial elite should be the new aristocracy on grounds of wealth, power and influence, but they are motivated by the desire for private profit and will manipulate the state to enrich themselves. Classic 21st century USA.

    The French revolution set the scene, and was somewhat earlier 1789 – 1799, but it’s a fact that all French non-aristocratic classes were exploited and oppressed through excessive taxation – and I would accept the consensus that this triggered the revolution.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Churchill of Marlborough was a snake. A remarkably talented snake, but still a snake.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • Check out this blog:

    Indian Hindus – Portrait of a Parasitical People

    https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2017/09/26/indian-hindus-portrait-of-a-parasitical-people/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @South Asian
    I will freely admit that India is a shithole by Western standards.
    However, admit that comparatively speaking the US states that are more than >90% White are also shitholes. West Virginia, Kentucky, Kansas, not to mention all the flyover countries in the middle where no immigrant wants to go. Also, rural America, which currently suffers from a major opioid crisis is also a humongous shithole.
    The best state in the United States is Massachusetts, the most liberal state. They are on the top when it comes to everything. The best education, bar none. Harvard, MIT, you name it. Probably the most educated people in all of America.
    The biggest group in Massachusetts are the Irish, who once were considered non-White. The second largest ethnic group are Italians, who again were considered non-White at one point in time. They have historically been receptive to immigrants.
    Same goes with New York, which has sizable Irish and Italian populations.
    The ones that are hostile to immigrants are the ones that are suffering.
    Should I have any sympathy?
    Nope.
    Maybe try to develop your state. Give people proper education regardless of background. I am talking about Mississippi and Alabama, that, due to hostility against blacks, are essentially speaking major shitholes.

    India is a $hithole by ANY standard. People who have travelled to other third world countries all agree that India filthiness is in a class of its own. Check out this site:

    http://www.planetcustodian.com/2015/10/19/8134/over-50-scary-images-depicting-filth-of-varanasi-and-river-ganges-that-went-viral-in-china.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • David Reich [Email him] Professor of Genetics at Harvard, has published a book about ancient human DNA: Who We Are and How We Got Here. He heralded publication with a March 23rd New York Times op-ed [How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ ] that got the chattering classes a-chattering and the sputtering classes...
  • I am personally tired of scientists apologizing for their discoveries.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • Anon[107] • Disclaimer says:
    @Talha
    Hey OCF,

    Talha, I do think immigrants should be told how they are viewed. My views aren’t uncommon.
     
    I agree, I was just saying that the particular example seemed really over the top as an example of typical views of Indian immigrants.

    My issue with many Muslims (and others) is that they hate the invade, but love the invite.
     
    I have the same exact issue.

    I can't speak for other Muslims, I can only speak for myself and plenty of other traditional Muslims I know. We are a religion, we are not an ethnicity. From my perspective; I hope native White people in Europe and America flourish. I have nothing against them. As of now, they are their own worst enemy; they have kicked religion to the side and have voluntarily taken up self-destructive practices that have destroyed their families. Fear of demographic takeover by immigrants is a simply a symptom of the greater disease. You guys have to figure out a solution after some very serious self-reflection.

    Islam is a solution that can get you back on track - it has worked for every single White convert I know. Anyone of them that is married has 3 to 4 kids; their future generations are secured. They have told me what they were up to before and it is clear there is no way they would have settled down and had a family without that change.

    If you don't like Islam, that's fine, find another solution and make it quick - time is running out.

    For me, if the behavior of Muslim immigrants like myself and others are getting in the way of Westerners accepting Islam, then we fully deserve to be kicked out and I pray that God either changes our ways or makes that happen quickly for both of our sake:
    "Our Lord! Make us not a trial for those who disbelieve, and forgive us, our Lord! Verily, You, only You are the All-Mighty, the All-Wise." (60:5)

    What is at stake is salvation in the afterlife; it is better for you if you all accepted the religion and kicked us all out. We will, inshaAllah, forgive you as brothers and simply start life again. I'm being very straight with you - because this is not a joking matter.

    I am very, very sick and tired of SJW Muslims not getting what is at stake here - they are being very petty and selfish; thinking it's all about them and their comfort in the West. It's not - it's much bigger than that - if we have to leave as a price for Westerners accepting Islam, it's a price well worth paying. God will compensate us handsomely. Maybe other groups of immigrants only care about not being tossed out, but that doesn't affect me. I was born in the briar patch and I don't mind being tossed back:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9oWq9zIXTY

    Take a look at these brothers - I and very happy they have started a much needed dialog on this important topic and back them fully:
    "How, exactly, promoting the migration of Muslims to non-Muslim western countries (mostly dreaming of welfare paradises) – especially with the huge rates of riddah or at least indulging in forbidden activities – is in any way conductive to the greater good of 'Islam in the western world'?"
    http://islam4europeans.com/2018/04/14/refugees-welcome/

    http://islam4europeans.com/2018/04/21/priorities-people/

    Peace.

    There is no one peaceful nation not afraid of Christianity crusade heaping havoc with violent killing. But they fear the Muslims Islam Jihadist, who believe their terrorism is God blessed with virgins awaiting, spreading their religion by multiplying with uncontrolled births polygamy.

    Pls stop selling your Islam like Christian missionary.

    Yet the Hindu extremists beat the Muslims up side down traditionally, slaughtering thousands in Modi’s state Gujarat. And that genocidal help Modi won landslide elections for his heroic acts . Coincidentally, Gujarat is also the place Thorfinnson has a pad, a legit white man business in India he asked us to believe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha

    But they fear the Muslims Islam Jihadist, who believe their terrorism is God blessed with virgins awaiting
     
    I fear those guys too. You can talk sense into some of them, but many of them are too deep into the muck to be able to pull them out of. Muslims, by far are the majority targets of these people - so we know the problem far too well. Here are the names and stats of the number of people killed in attacks of the mausoleums of Sufi shaykhs in Pakistan:
    https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/interactive/2017/02/attack-shrines-pakistan-2005-170219181655660.html

    spreading their religion by multiplying with uncontrolled births
     
    Yeah, we have kids - that's a feature not a bug. People who convert to Islam also tend to have families with kids. Maybe you don't like kids - that's not our problem - feel free not to have any and encourage your friends not to have any.

    polygamy
     
    In some cultures it's common for people to have more than one wife - what business is it of yours if they aren't bothering you in their countries? They get to have more kids you get to make fun of them at cocktail parties with your unmarried friends; both sides benefit. Please, laugh it up at our expense:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dADXIdcbMpY

    I get it if it comes down to Muslims trying to have polygamous marriages in the West; simply make it illegal and enforce the law.

    Pls stop selling your Islam like Christian missionary.
     
    Sure, I'll knock it off if your name is Ron Unz - is it? Otherwise there is a button for "ignore commenter", please use it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Simple solution to the ‘Indian problem’:
    - No more h1b
    - No more citizenship to any immigrant (takes care of chain migration)
    - citizenship for only folks born in USA to legal immigrants

    How do we get there:
    - Make STEM subjects very rewarding for our own students – tons of awards for gifted
    - State efforts to shift focus from NBA, NFL and other sports in schools to technical and scientific studies
    - Convince folks that importing slaves, immigrants for the ‘dirty work’ does not pay in the long term

    Make federal law changes/amendments to insure:
    - Punishment of corporations or individuals that sacrifice domestic workers’ interests for their corporate/personal gains
    - Best talent, and not ethnic quota, becomes criteria for opportunities in NFL, NBA, Ivy education, Fed/State jobs
    - Education, Infrastructure are assigned higher priorities than being the policeman of the world

    Once we get there and then if we do not need those American citizens of Indian heritage like me, we can throw them out. I will have no issues with that. Life is short. Live only where you are appreciated.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Mad World An increasingly common cliché these days is that America is mired in the midst of its own Cultural Revolution. One of the most fascinatingly telling incidents to this effect occurred in a library at the University of Washington around January 2017, shortly after Trump had delivered his inauguration speech.[1] Various protestors stormed what...
  • You’re merely repeating (at greater, yet more ignorant, length) your original nonsensical “argument.” Clearly, you lack even the minimal reasoning ability required to comprehend its internal inconsistency — or perhaps have somehow convinced yourself that you can make up for it by doubling down on your dogmatic, ignorant, hate-filled race denialism. Sad.

    Your basic argument is the same, despite its meaningless rhetorical flourishes. Part of it seems to be the typically Far Left inability to distinguish between normative and positive statements; and of course part of it stems from your (wholly misplaced) confidence in your own “intelligence” and “morality.”

    “you think I am making an argument specifically against the west (typical WN victimization complex), when its obvious that I am making an abstract moral argument…bla bla bla more pilpul and sophistry at greater and more pointless length”

    1. At whom is your argument directed, hmm? Do you understand what the term “deliberately disingenuous” means? I thought not.

    2. So you support open borders for China? India? Israel?

    3. You seem remarkably determined to maintain your “abstract moral argument” in such a rarefied state of abstraction that it is entirely free-floating, and not grounded in anything even approaching empirical support. This sort of worthless, transparently-false imitation of actual logical argumentation is typical of the Far Left (and of a certain ethnic group, of course).

    Repeating your initial misconceptions, only at greater length, and with more emotional incontinence, while ignoring my (very basic) point, does nothing to legitimize your “argument.” You’re shadowboxing here — engaging with the demons of your fervid imagination, rather than the arguments right in front of you. Again, this is typical of the Far Left; they fail to comprehend the Right’s actual arguments (which they have no answer for, anyway), and choose instead to engage with the caricatures of those arguments that their teevees spoon-feed to them. Sad.

    Again — all races/ peoples/ cultures expand/ settle / invade when they get the chance. This is an (obviously true) observation about the real world, not a moral judgment. I have no “moral obligation” to accept your pathetic attempts to push White guilt on me. I’m merely noting that you would never attempt to push Turk guilt on the Turks, or North African guilt on the descendants of the Barbary pirates, or Jew guilt on those responsible for the Bolshevik revolution Everyone has the right to self-defense. Of course, your rabid, unreasoning anti-White hatred leads you to convince yourself that somehow every other race does, but Whites do not.

    But keep on rationalizing your hatred, at even greater length. Go right ahead. It’s clear that the process somehow paradoxically raises your badly misplaced sense of your own virtuousness to even greater heights. Have fun.

    Read More
    • Replies: @GammaRay

    You’re merely repeating (at greater, yet more ignorant, length) your original nonsensical “argument.” Clearly, you lack even the minimal reasoning ability required to comprehend its internal inconsistency — or perhaps have somehow convinced yourself that you can make up for it by doubling down on your dogmatic, ignorant, hate-filled race denialism. Sad.
     
    Wrong. Just because you claim that my arguments are wrong, does not make them wrong. I suspect you know this too, and that's why you avoid digging too deep into the actual substance of my arguments and instead prefer to flit around the edges and try to throw out non-sequitur responses

    Your basic argument is the same, despite its meaningless rhetorical flourishes. Part of it seems to be the typically Far Left inability to distinguish between normative and positive statements; and of course part of it stems from your (wholly misplaced) confidence in your own “intelligence” and “morality.”
     
    Instead of simply flinging accusations; please clearly show why my rhetoric is meaningless instead of merely claiming that it is meaningless. You are trying to accuse me of being unable to distinguish between normative and positive statements because you are either unable to or unwilling to discuss the merits of my arguments themselves. I stand behind my arguments and have no problem discussing their merits with you.


    “you think I am making an argument specifically against the west (typical WN victimization complex), when its obvious that I am making an abstract moral argument…bla bla bla more pilpul and sophistry at greater and more pointless length”
     
    1. At whom is your argument directed, hmm? Do you understand what the term “deliberately disingenuous” means? I thought not.
     
    Its pretty obvious that I'm making an abstract moral argument. You just use the terms pilpul (your favorite word) and sophistry in order to try to ad hom my argument instead of actually discussing it:

    Your low comprehension abilities has made it so that you think I am making an argument specifically against the west (typical WN victimization complex), when its obvious that I am making an abstract moral argument which incidentally involves the west. My point entirely revolves around the importance of moral consistency. Alt-righters/WN who insist on being proud of the west’s extensive colonial history while simultaneously crying about how unfair mass immigration is are no different than a serial thief who complains about other people stealing from him. This is a very simple point, I don’t understand how you continue to misunderstand this. Your response trying to debunk this was completely off the mark since you didn’t understand the argument that was being made in the first place.
     
    The point I made is very clear. There is hardly any ambiguity here; and any people that are reading our exchange can clearly see what I wrote as well. If you choose to embrace moral consistency or reject it, its up to you; but that doesnt change the validity of my point. Do you realize how ridiculous it looks when alt-righters/WN condone the west's centuries of violent conquests and destruction of other races and cultures but then turn around and preach about the sanctity of racial/cultural preservation and how every race deserves a homeland? That is called hypocrisy my friend. You are perfectly free to disregard my call for greater moral consistency on the far-right; but its at your own peril not mine.

    2. So you support open borders for China? India? Israel?
     
    If china, india or israel had colonized the entire world (in the process destroying countless cultures and indigenous peoples) just so that they could exploit the land for their own benefit then yes, I would not feel bad seeing these countries end up having to deal with the unexpected/unforeseen consequence of their immoral actions. That being said, I have never advocated open borders, rather I only made the neutral observation that the west is being unexpectedly haunted by its colonial past. I don't think that anybody really debates the validity of this observation. Even you don't debate it, that's why you continue to tiptoe around it instead of taking that argument head on. Anyways, you seem to have this odd notion that I am only applying my logic to the west when really I hold everyone to these same standards. If any culture/civilization/etc decides to act in an immoral fashion and then ends up getting screwed over because of it later on, then they fully deserve what happens to them. I don't care if they're white, black, yellow etc etc.

    3. You seem remarkably determined to maintain your “abstract moral argument” in such a rarefied state of abstraction that it is entirely free-floating, and not grounded in anything even approaching empirical support. This sort of worthless, transparently-false imitation of actual logical argumentation is typical of the Far Left (and of a certain ethnic group, of course).

    Repeating your initial misconceptions, only at greater length, and with more emotional incontinence, while ignoring my (very basic) point, does nothing to legitimize your “argument.” You’re shadowboxing here — engaging with the demons of your fervid imagination, rather than the arguments right in front of you. Again, this is typical of the Far Left; they fail to comprehend the Right’s actual arguments (which they have no answer for, anyway), and choose instead to engage with the caricatures of those arguments that their teevees spoon-feed to them. Sad.
     
    You accuse me of pilpul and making empty arguments, but isn't this exactly what you're doing? I'm imploring you to discuss the topic itself, but you seem to be fixated on arguing about how I am arguing instead.
    , @GammaRay

    Again — all races/ peoples/ cultures expand/ settle / invade when they get the chance. This is an (obviously true) observation about the real world, not a moral judgment. I have no “moral obligation” to accept your pathetic attempts to push White guilt on me. I’m merely noting that you would never attempt to push Turk guilt on the Turks, or North African guilt on the descendants of the Barbary pirates, or Jew guilt on those responsible for the Bolshevik revolution Everyone has the right to self-defense. Of course, your rabid, unreasoning anti-White hatred leads you to convince yourself that somehow every other race does, but Whites do not.
     
    Not necessarily. What you're saying is patently untrue. If this was true, then why did the ming dynasty willingly destroy their (massive) fleet and then voluntarily close their borders to the outside world? They had the chance to expand and settle, but they chose not to. Not all cultures value expansion and colonialism as much as the west does. The ming dynasty is only one example; I'm sure there are plenty of other examples where others cultures had the opportunity to expand/invade but instead chose not to. You are only pushing this erroneous line of reasoning because it is convenient for you and it exonerates the west; however its a piece of reasoning that doesn't hold up so well when put to the test. You need to understand, not every culture is as warlike, domineering and expansive as western european culture is; different cultures simply have different prerogatives.

    White nationalists always want to brag about how intrepid, brave and adventurous white people are compared to other races; well...with that kind of mindset, global colonization is what you get. White nationalists always want to brag about how unique and different white people are when it comes to anything positive about white people, but then all the sudden whenever anything negative comes up white nationalists always try to backtrack and act as if everybody possesses equal capacity for doing bad things. That's pretty disingenuous if you ask me

    Also I find it funny that you want to claim the law of the jungle with regards to the ubiquity of colonialism and how that precludes any kind of universal moral judgment being passed against it, yet in the same paragraph you suddenly want to talk about how everyone has the right to self defense. So basically you are trying to imply that universal notions of morality do not exist when it comes to colonization, but then suddenly universal notions of morality exist when it comes to self defense IE cultural preservation? If according to you my assertion that colonialism is immoral is baseless, then just what are you basing your own idea of universal right to self defense on? You're basically trying to selectively enforce morality at this point, and you only talk about "rights" when it benefits you, instead of being morally consistent and applying notions of morality equally no matter what.

    The turks, north africans or jews were not the primary topic of discussion in this particular conversation; hence that is why nobody discusses their culpability or blame. If we were specifically discussing the turks, north africans or jews within that sort of context then I would have no problem objectively discussing their potential culpability. We are discussing the culpability of the west with regards to colonization because it is tangential, not because of any personal biases. That being said, I am personally biased against hypocrites, but this is a bias that transcends race and color lines.

    But keep on rationalizing your hatred, at even greater length. Go right ahead. It’s clear that the process somehow paradoxically raises your badly misplaced sense of your own virtuousness to even greater heights. Have fun.
     
    Not really, Im as cool as a cucumber. And yes, I am having fun dissecting your arguments and verbally jousting with you
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • TT says:
    @Anonymous
    Of course not all Indian men are rapists. Nice straw man argument.

    But, it's clear that India still has a very primitive view on tape. And that there are a lot of Indians who are not bothered much by little girls getting gang raped, something that is universally abhorred in civilized society.

    And they have penchant for raping babies too if you read their news. Caste system is still so widespread, if a woman meet lower caste men, the man is killed & his sisters raped as punishment. That high caste woman, is sometimes gang raped for weeks by their caste leaders, a group of their wise very old men. They said its a punishment & sex education to cleanse a horny woman.

    Just search abit you can get tonnes of India rape news. Its out of control, and police will punish complainants for a little bribe, court took decades to hear, culprits burned the victims & her family. Victims are ordered to marry their rapist as settlement.

    Its a higher caste privilege to rape low caste. Most Indians know.

    Even dogs are not spared, a Indian security guard was caught after people find him always lock himself inside with the guard dog, which groaning in painful swollen ass.

    The society is simply sickened with poverty & illiteracy, Hindu caste system & rampant corruption, spiraling a great civilization to a cesspool. Yet indians here are still trying to sell Indian snake oil & export their problem out instead of trying to improve their country.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JohnnyWalker123
    https://twitter.com/BlueWave_777_/status/988297838768439296

    https://twitter.com/BlueWave_777_/status/988297710355660800
    , @Anonymous
    ''Its a higher caste privilege to rape low caste. Most Indians know.''

    I am a higher caste person and no such thing exists. And the rest of your comment is filled with so many extreme exaggerations. A few people do that and you accuse all the millions of the people of the caste and hundreds of millions of the country.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @TT
    What a truthful Indian. But... but why none of the neighbors has a scanty look of Indians, all so chinky look and none want to be with India?

    India’s immediate neighbours are India… just because the Cracka broke it up (which is regretted now by the empire) doesn’t change that… it’s all coming back!
     
    Too bad, China will block Indian land grab wet dream like Mauritius case with its mighty army. One day South Tibet with 7sisters will be liberated by China.

    Nepal is safe now from India oil blockage with China help. Pak is well equipped by China & Russia to defend against another attack. Bhutan & Sikkim may soon find a chance to get China help. Sri Lanka has extensive cooperation with China to defend against India aggression. Myanmar has historically purge Indian sepoy deployed by British colonist to populate their fertile Ayyerwaddy delta.

    Even Iran is now inviting China & Pak to build their seaport instead of India. Afghanistan don't want India RAW inside.

    Africa is purging Indians, granting mega projects to China instead of poor inferrior Indian companies. Oz is backlashing on Indians WMM long ago. Even UK people are hating Indians now. Singapore is at boiling point.

    Traditional ally Russia is cosy up with Pak against traitor India, watching how Indian dance with the ZUS wolf, even let ZUS tour their rented Russia nuke sub.

    Even India best soulmate USA, their people are getting so fed up. If Indian touch Jp, they will commit suicide by cutting own abdomen. Korean will never accept.

    Only Bangladesh alone is left in the world for India, but you don't want your poor Muslims brothers after breaking them from Pak by war.

    Every single neighbors or countries close or far hate & fear poor filthy hostile India. Everywhere Indians touch people scream for help…ooh…what a great nation can that be when it has no single friend except their colonial master Anglozionist? Go try Zionists Isreal see if they will welcome you.

    Chinese in Ethiopia.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bliss

    Chinese in Ethiopia.
     
    Wow. Sounds good, looks good. Great discipline and harmony. Things are looking up for Africa.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • TT says:
    @Anonymous
    Those states are not a shithole. You are just racist and stereotyping. Why is it a shithole? Because there aren't enough Starbucks there for you?


    Comparing any of these states to a literal shithole India is a joke. You don't see pigs snatching a baby and running off with it in Kentucky.

    Not pigs, its their smartest Indian mongrel. They are hungry, even human wastes are not enough for pigs & dogs roaming their every streets. Cows are chewing up plastic bags too at highways. Food is scarce, but… but trust them, Indians will make America great again like another India, the next sole Greatest Superpower surpassing China & USA as they declare.

    Thomm said India is China in 2009. But Chinese eat dogs for tonic, India dogs eat Indian baby for food in 2018. Mamamia, what a great comparison.

    Dagon Shield said Washington big apple people & dogs shit on open just as Indians did on same level….but we pick up our dog poopoo to avoid fine, India dogs fight over Indians poopoo to avoid hungry. Mamamia, what a great comparison.

    Sure they will make America great again, if US dogs start eating babies & fighting over our poopoo.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In my infamous column “The Talk, Nonblack Version” at TakiMag, six years ago this month, I introduced the ad hoc abbreviation IWSB for “Intelligent and Well-Socialized Blacks.” I then advised the nonblack youth of America as follows: I can’t really claim to have been very energetic about taking my own advice here, but there is...
  • @attilathehen
    OK RCC cuck.

    “OK RCC cuck.”

    No, it’s all in the Bible. Word for word. A strict interpretation of the Good Book.

    Corinthians 13:4-7–Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.

    John 3:20–For whenever our heart condemns us, God is greater than our heart, and he knows everything.

    You made the statement. “Derb’s Chinese tiger mama did not produce anything of value.” It
    is clear that God values all human beings, based on just those two passages alone.

    Why do you insist on bastardizing the faith?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • TT says:
    @Dagon Shield
    India's immediate neighbours are India... just because the Cracka broke it up (which is regretted now by the empire) doesn't change that... it's all coming back!

    What a truthful Indian. But… but why none of the neighbors has a scanty look of Indians, all so chinky look and none want to be with India?

    India’s immediate neighbours are India… just because the Cracka broke it up (which is regretted now by the empire) doesn’t change that… it’s all coming back!

    Too bad, China will block Indian land grab wet dream like Mauritius case with its mighty army. One day South Tibet with 7sisters will be liberated by China.

    Nepal is safe now from India oil blockage with China help. Pak is well equipped by China & Russia to defend against another attack. Bhutan & Sikkim may soon find a chance to get China help. Sri Lanka has extensive cooperation with China to defend against India aggression. Myanmar has historically purge Indian sepoy deployed by British colonist to populate their fertile Ayyerwaddy delta.

    Even Iran is now inviting China & Pak to build their seaport instead of India. Afghanistan don’t want India RAW inside.

    Africa is purging Indians, granting mega projects to China instead of poor inferrior Indian companies. Oz is backlashing on Indians WMM long ago. Even UK people are hating Indians now. Singapore is at boiling point.

    Traditional ally Russia is cosy up with Pak against traitor India, watching how Indian dance with the ZUS wolf, even let ZUS tour their rented Russia nuke sub.

    Even India best soulmate USA, their people are getting so fed up. If Indian touch Jp, they will commit suicide by cutting own abdomen. Korean will never accept.

    Only Bangladesh alone is left in the world for India, but you don’t want your poor Muslims brothers after breaking them from Pak by war.

    Every single neighbors or countries close or far hate & fear poor filthy hostile India. Everywhere Indians touch people scream for help…ooh…what a great nation can that be when it has no single friend except their colonial master Anglozionist? Go try Zionists Isreal see if they will welcome you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JohnnyWalker123
    Chinese in Ethiopia.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx14W62hB7M

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • God bless America!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.