The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / On "Lebanon"
 All Comments / On "Lebanon"
    “This is not good!” cautions a new Lebanese friend in a stern tone of warning, clutching this reporters arm for emphasis. “This, where you are going.. it is their neighbourhood... Hizbullah's neighbourhood. They control this completely!” Protesting that this quest is well-intentioned, no secret and no threat, this friend provides probably the most important council,...
  • Anonymous[178] • Disclaimer says:
    @Erebus

    The resident “teams” will now “educate” you about multidimensional chess play and long term geopolitical planning.
     
    Ever heard of the Dunning-Kruger Effect? No? Here it is, explained... https://psmag.com/social-justice/confident-idiots-92793. In a nutshell, the effect is is of supreme confidence based on nothing more than being unaware of the existence of skills beyond your understanding.

    I can willingly accede Greasy's point about the Israeli public's lust for war. Though it flies in the face of my limited and anecdotal experience, I know it's limited and can therefore be gainsaid by someone with better/more data on the mood of the Israeli public (though I haven't seen Greasy present any). I'm aware of the fact that there's real political data & expertise about the mood of the Israeli public that I don't have, and so I wrote speculatively.

    OTOH, you are ever making light of "multidimensional chess play" and "long term geopolitical planning". Greasy echoed it. Is it precisely because you are not aware of being utterly unaware of your short-comings in either field? Do they seem nonexistent simply because you aren't aware of them and/or the modes of thinking that they entail?
    Are you aware that States employ multidimensional chess players and long term geopolitical thinkers to think in precisely those terms? That they, if they're actually led by responsible people not suffering from the Dunning-Kruger Effect, take the thoughts of such into consideration in deciding on strategies and tactics?

    Your writings suggest it is so. Perhaps you'd consider remedying that before exposing yourself in public. It is, or should be, embarrassing.

    Very modest of you not to call it the Dunning-Kruger-Erebus effect since you have demonstrated it so well despite your unassuming efforts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mulegino1
    Refuting your meretricious shilling for the establishment is pretty effortless.

    The ballistics argument is entirely valid. Once any flying object, whether it is an arrow, a rock, a bullet or an airliner is used as a weapon, then ballistics enter the equation. A commercial Boeing 767 would make a very poor armor piercing bullet. And structural steel can definitely be considered armor. The soft and hollow carbon nose cone of a 767 can be severely damaged by colliding with a bird in flight at cruising speed. It would not be very adept at penetrating the structural steel perimeter columns, spandrels and concrete pans of WTC 2, now would it? It does not matter if it is "solid stuff". The perimeter columns and concrete of the WTC are much more solid and rigid than the hollow and thin skinned fuselage of a 767. Compare a 767 to an armor piercing round which can indeed pierce 1/2" (1/4"+1/4")- a hollow and light ductile aluminium cylinder with quite delicate wings whose tips are so delicate they cannot bear any more load than the running lights, to the hardened alloy tip, tungsten metal jacket and solid steel core of an armor piercing round. Invoking "solid stuff" is a rather nebulous evasion.

    Also, even NIST acknowledges that WTC 7 fell at free fall acceleration. This is stunning. Office fires and flying debris are not capable of removing all underlying support of a steel and concrete skyscraper, which is what "free fall" entails. Besides, only a fool can look at the implosion of WTC 7 and claim that it is not controlled demolition.

    As for the molecular dissociation of most of the steel and concrete, that simply means that the compounds were disintegrated, as one of the signature elements of the dust- particles of free iron- demonstrate conclusively. That was the dust cloud that blanketed lower Manhattan- the disintegrated components of the WTC. No hydrocarbon based office fire or gravity collapse on earth can do this.

    I have been laid up and amusing myself watching TV documentaries including three National Geographic “Air Crash Investigations”. One of them I already knew a lot about and I found the National Geographic doco very good and accurate. Not that that mattered for present pirposes because what gave the lie to your nonsense about ballistics and armour piercing bullets was just the pictures of where large parts of the fuselage had plunged into the ground at 500 knots. The one at Lockerbie was huge – and specifically, deep, and the one 65km west of New Delhi in 1996 had the cockpit and forward part of the fuselage of a 747 so deeply embedded in the earth, despite it having become detached and fallen under gravity, that it took days if not weeks to get to the black boxes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    Good post.
    Informative and from the "inside" of one of the parties there.

    A couple of points, though.

    The Israeli people WANT WAR with Lebanon.
     
    with

    It is the IDF and the Government that do not want war.
     
    Taking into account a particular relationships between people, Government and IDF in Israel that feels a bit awkward.
    Those three entities, in Israel, are much closer to each other than in most countries.

    Hezbollah will not be able to wage a guerrilla war against the IDF like they did in the 80s and 90s.
     
    The last time Hezbollah didn't wage guerrilla war.
    Now, the interesting speculation would be: would they fight that defensive battle if their own population base is ethnically cleansed from the region?

    As for this:

    Just a few hours ago, Israel carried out the largest bombing attack it ever has on Syria, even though you promised only a few weeks ago that Israel would never be able to bomb Syria again. Basically your side saying that the IDF can’t do something is a guarantee that the IDF will do just that.
     
    fear not.
    The resident "teams" will now "educate" you about multidimensional chess play and long term geopolitical planning.

    The resident “teams” will now “educate” you about multidimensional chess play and long term geopolitical planning.

    Ever heard of the Dunning-Kruger Effect? No? Here it is, explained… https://psmag.com/social-justice/confident-idiots-92793. In a nutshell, the effect is is of supreme confidence based on nothing more than being unaware of the existence of skills beyond your understanding.

    I can willingly accede Greasy’s point about the Israeli public’s lust for war. Though it flies in the face of my limited and anecdotal experience, I know it’s limited and can therefore be gainsaid by someone with better/more data on the mood of the Israeli public (though I haven’t seen Greasy present any). I’m aware of the fact that there’s real political data & expertise about the mood of the Israeli public that I don’t have, and so I wrote speculatively.

    OTOH, you are ever making light of “multidimensional chess play” and “long term geopolitical planning”. Greasy echoed it. Is it precisely because you are not aware of being utterly unaware of your short-comings in either field? Do they seem nonexistent simply because you aren’t aware of them and/or the modes of thinking that they entail?
    Are you aware that States employ multidimensional chess players and long term geopolitical thinkers to think in precisely those terms? That they, if they’re actually led by responsible people not suffering from the Dunning-Kruger Effect, take the thoughts of such into consideration in deciding on strategies and tactics?

    Your writings suggest it is so. Perhaps you’d consider remedying that before exposing yourself in public. It is, or should be, embarrassing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Very modest of you not to call it the Dunning-Kruger-Erebus effect since you have demonstrated it so well despite your unassuming efforts.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Greasy William

    Now, the interesting speculation would be: would they fight that defensive battle if their own population base is ethnically cleansed from the region?
     
    Yes they would. Think WWII Japanese.

    Taking into account a particular relationships between people, Government and IDF in Israel that feels a bit awkward.
    Those three entities, in Israel, are much closer to each other than in most countries.
     
    Not really. The IDF, along with the entire Israeli deep state, is dominated by the Left the same way the Turkish military and bureaucracy was dominated by the secular before Erdogan purged them.

    It's true that Israeli's worship the IDF, but they more worship it as an institution as opposed to worshiping the IDF brass. The IDF brass's credibility declines with each humiliating failure.

    The government is to the left of the public too, but way to the right of the IDF. It is understood in Israel, for example, that if Netanyahu told the IDF to bomb Iran, the IDF would refuse to carry out the order. Before the Syrian civil war broke out, the IDF was putting huge pressure on Bibi to give the Golan back to Assad.

    It kinda makes sense that the government would be to the left of the public. It is the government that is going to have to deal with the international backlash in the next war and is going to be responsible for rebuilding the northern part of the country.

    fear not.
    The resident “teams” will now “educate” you about multidimensional chess play and long term geopolitical planning.
     
    Not this time I don't think. On social media they seem genuinely mystified that Putin hasn't nuked Israel in retaliation. This is a very tough one for them to explain.

    Also, as delusional as they are even they know how bad a look it is to go from "Israeli planes can't even operate in their own airspace! The IAF has been defeated!" to "Israeli aircraft can bomb any part of Syria whenever they want without any losses or retaliation."

    They are acting like people from those apocalyptic cults do after the world hasn't ended at the predicted time.

    Good post.

    This I found informative, probably even eye opening:

    The IDF, along with the entire Israeli deep state, is dominated by the Left….
    ….worship it as an institution as opposed to worshiping the IDF brass.
    It is understood in Israel, for example, that if Netanyahu told the IDF to bomb Iran, the IDF would refuse to carry out the order. Before the Syrian civil war broke out, the IDF was putting huge pressure on Bibi to give the Golan back to Assad.

    Good one:

    They are acting like people from those apocalyptic cults do after the world hasn’t ended at the predicted time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Now, the interesting speculation would be: would they fight that defensive battle if their own population base is ethnically cleansed from the region?

    Yes they would. Think WWII Japanese.

    Taking into account a particular relationships between people, Government and IDF in Israel that feels a bit awkward.
    Those three entities, in Israel, are much closer to each other than in most countries.

    Not really. The IDF, along with the entire Israeli deep state, is dominated by the Left the same way the Turkish military and bureaucracy was dominated by the secular before Erdogan purged them.

    It’s true that Israeli’s worship the IDF, but they more worship it as an institution as opposed to worshiping the IDF brass. The IDF brass’s credibility declines with each humiliating failure.

    The government is to the left of the public too, but way to the right of the IDF. It is understood in Israel, for example, that if Netanyahu told the IDF to bomb Iran, the IDF would refuse to carry out the order. Before the Syrian civil war broke out, the IDF was putting huge pressure on Bibi to give the Golan back to Assad.

    It kinda makes sense that the government would be to the left of the public. It is the government that is going to have to deal with the international backlash in the next war and is going to be responsible for rebuilding the northern part of the country.

    fear not.
    The resident “teams” will now “educate” you about multidimensional chess play and long term geopolitical planning.

    Not this time I don’t think. On social media they seem genuinely mystified that Putin hasn’t nuked Israel in retaliation. This is a very tough one for them to explain.

    Also, as delusional as they are even they know how bad a look it is to go from “Israeli planes can’t even operate in their own airspace! The IAF has been defeated!” to “Israeli aircraft can bomb any part of Syria whenever they want without any losses or retaliation.”

    They are acting like people from those apocalyptic cults do after the world hasn’t ended at the predicted time.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    Good post.

    This I found informative, probably even eye opening:

    The IDF, along with the entire Israeli deep state, is dominated by the Left....
    ....worship it as an institution as opposed to worshiping the IDF brass.
    It is understood in Israel, for example, that if Netanyahu told the IDF to bomb Iran, the IDF would refuse to carry out the order. Before the Syrian civil war broke out, the IDF was putting huge pressure on Bibi to give the Golan back to Assad.
     
    Good one:

    They are acting like people from those apocalyptic cults do after the world hasn’t ended at the predicted time.
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Greasy William

    It is just as likely, in my mind, that missiles landing in Schlomo’s bedroom may elicit a reaction the war mongers didn’t bargain for.
     
    Man you're delusional. And you know absolutely nothing about Israeli politics.


    1. The Israeli people WANT WAR with Lebanon. They don't care about how badly Hezbollah will bomb them in return. It is the IDF and the Government that do not want war.

    2. IDF plans for the next war are pretty simple: destroy every power and water plant in Lebanon (this will essentially end Lebanon as a functional country for about a decade), use terror bombing/shelling to ethnically cleanse the Lebanese people from the first 10 to 20 km of S Lebanon, send the IDF 40 to 60 km into Lebanon and finally go directly into Hezbollah's rat holes to flush Hezbollah out. Then permanently occupy a 10 to 20 km belt in Southern Lebanon. But this time, all the civilians of S Lebanon will have been killed or driven out, so Hezbollah will not be able to wage a guerrilla war against the IDF like they did in the 80s and 90s.

    3. This will cause horrific casualties for Israel. They know that and they don't care. They are not just willing to pay the price, they are eager to. You of course don't know this because you get your news for The Saker, Southfront and Sputnik.

    4. I already know your response because I have been hearing it for the last 12 years: "Nuh uh! Hezbollah is invincible and the IDF could never do that!". Yeah I know. Just like the IDF couldn't destroy the Syrian reactor or force Hamas to stop firing rockets. Just a few hours ago, Israel carried out the largest bombing attack it ever has on Syria, even though you promised only a few weeks ago that Israel would never be able to bomb Syria again. Basically your side saying that the IDF can't do something is a guarantee that the IDF will do just that.

    5. My advice? Enjoy the time you have left with your Lebanese. Their future isn't looking bright. Maybe you can put up a Lebanese refugee at your house after the next war? There is going to be millions of them.

    Good post.
    Informative and from the “inside” of one of the parties there.

    A couple of points, though.

    The Israeli people WANT WAR with Lebanon.

    with

    It is the IDF and the Government that do not want war.

    Taking into account a particular relationships between people, Government and IDF in Israel that feels a bit awkward.
    Those three entities, in Israel, are much closer to each other than in most countries.

    Hezbollah will not be able to wage a guerrilla war against the IDF like they did in the 80s and 90s.

    The last time Hezbollah didn’t wage guerrilla war.
    Now, the interesting speculation would be: would they fight that defensive battle if their own population base is ethnically cleansed from the region?

    As for this:

    Just a few hours ago, Israel carried out the largest bombing attack it ever has on Syria, even though you promised only a few weeks ago that Israel would never be able to bomb Syria again. Basically your side saying that the IDF can’t do something is a guarantee that the IDF will do just that.

    fear not.
    The resident “teams” will now “educate” you about multidimensional chess play and long term geopolitical planning.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Erebus

    The resident “teams” will now “educate” you about multidimensional chess play and long term geopolitical planning.
     
    Ever heard of the Dunning-Kruger Effect? No? Here it is, explained... https://psmag.com/social-justice/confident-idiots-92793. In a nutshell, the effect is is of supreme confidence based on nothing more than being unaware of the existence of skills beyond your understanding.

    I can willingly accede Greasy's point about the Israeli public's lust for war. Though it flies in the face of my limited and anecdotal experience, I know it's limited and can therefore be gainsaid by someone with better/more data on the mood of the Israeli public (though I haven't seen Greasy present any). I'm aware of the fact that there's real political data & expertise about the mood of the Israeli public that I don't have, and so I wrote speculatively.

    OTOH, you are ever making light of "multidimensional chess play" and "long term geopolitical planning". Greasy echoed it. Is it precisely because you are not aware of being utterly unaware of your short-comings in either field? Do they seem nonexistent simply because you aren't aware of them and/or the modes of thinking that they entail?
    Are you aware that States employ multidimensional chess players and long term geopolitical thinkers to think in precisely those terms? That they, if they're actually led by responsible people not suffering from the Dunning-Kruger Effect, take the thoughts of such into consideration in deciding on strategies and tactics?

    Your writings suggest it is so. Perhaps you'd consider remedying that before exposing yourself in public. It is, or should be, embarrassing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Erebus

    No name calling ?...Let’s see.
     
    I have a weak spot Peter, and it frustrates me when you fail to exploit it to make your point. It's called reason. Anyway, so far, so good.

    -Agree. Works both ways though. They go for TelAviv the response becomes harsher.
     
    This is a bit of an imponderable, at least at this distance. My read is that neither the Israeli elites nor Schlomo-6-pack are all gung-ho for war on Lebanon. It is just as likely, in my mind, that missiles landing in Schlomo's bedroom may elicit a reaction the war mongers didn't bargain for.

    And the Big Brother reaction too (all help imaginable). So, mixed blessing there I guess.
     
    This is another imponderable. "War for Israel" has a much higher profile, and a much less appealing ring to it than 15 years ago.
    Also, as the US would be well aware, HZB has some big brothers too, and that the US' entry into the conflict would have to be overt and decisive. That means war on Iran, and one wonders if they have the stomach for that. Iran has the ability to do some serious damage to American M.E. assets, especially if the Russians have been adding to their missile arsenal surreptitiously, so the risks may be very high indeed.
    Losing the 5th Fleet for the sake of supporting Israel's unprovoked attack on Lebanon isn't something I'd like to have to explain to the American public. The Deplorables may not take that lying down.

    I have a weak spot Peter, and it frustrates me when you fail to exploit it to make your point. It’s called reason. Anyway, so far, so good.

    Hehe…getting there. The second.

    ..US’ entry into the conflict would have to be overt and decisive.

    Don’t think so. No need.

    Losing the 5th Fleet…

    Iranians……sinking……the………5th ……….Fleet.
    That does it.

    Looking forward for the third.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Erebus

    No name calling ?...Let’s see.
     
    I have a weak spot Peter, and it frustrates me when you fail to exploit it to make your point. It's called reason. Anyway, so far, so good.

    -Agree. Works both ways though. They go for TelAviv the response becomes harsher.
     
    This is a bit of an imponderable, at least at this distance. My read is that neither the Israeli elites nor Schlomo-6-pack are all gung-ho for war on Lebanon. It is just as likely, in my mind, that missiles landing in Schlomo's bedroom may elicit a reaction the war mongers didn't bargain for.

    And the Big Brother reaction too (all help imaginable). So, mixed blessing there I guess.
     
    This is another imponderable. "War for Israel" has a much higher profile, and a much less appealing ring to it than 15 years ago.
    Also, as the US would be well aware, HZB has some big brothers too, and that the US' entry into the conflict would have to be overt and decisive. That means war on Iran, and one wonders if they have the stomach for that. Iran has the ability to do some serious damage to American M.E. assets, especially if the Russians have been adding to their missile arsenal surreptitiously, so the risks may be very high indeed.
    Losing the 5th Fleet for the sake of supporting Israel's unprovoked attack on Lebanon isn't something I'd like to have to explain to the American public. The Deplorables may not take that lying down.

    It is just as likely, in my mind, that missiles landing in Schlomo’s bedroom may elicit a reaction the war mongers didn’t bargain for.

    Man you’re delusional. And you know absolutely nothing about Israeli politics.

    1. The Israeli people WANT WAR with Lebanon. They don’t care about how badly Hezbollah will bomb them in return. It is the IDF and the Government that do not want war.

    2. IDF plans for the next war are pretty simple: destroy every power and water plant in Lebanon (this will essentially end Lebanon as a functional country for about a decade), use terror bombing/shelling to ethnically cleanse the Lebanese people from the first 10 to 20 km of S Lebanon, send the IDF 40 to 60 km into Lebanon and finally go directly into Hezbollah’s rat holes to flush Hezbollah out. Then permanently occupy a 10 to 20 km belt in Southern Lebanon. But this time, all the civilians of S Lebanon will have been killed or driven out, so Hezbollah will not be able to wage a guerrilla war against the IDF like they did in the 80s and 90s.

    3. This will cause horrific casualties for Israel. They know that and they don’t care. They are not just willing to pay the price, they are eager to. You of course don’t know this because you get your news for The Saker, Southfront and Sputnik.

    4. I already know your response because I have been hearing it for the last 12 years: “Nuh uh! Hezbollah is invincible and the IDF could never do that!”. Yeah I know. Just like the IDF couldn’t destroy the Syrian reactor or force Hamas to stop firing rockets. Just a few hours ago, Israel carried out the largest bombing attack it ever has on Syria, even though you promised only a few weeks ago that Israel would never be able to bomb Syria again. Basically your side saying that the IDF can’t do something is a guarantee that the IDF will do just that.

    5. My advice? Enjoy the time you have left with your Lebanese. Their future isn’t looking bright. Maybe you can put up a Lebanese refugee at your house after the next war? There is going to be millions of them.

    Read More
    • LOL: L.K
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    Good post.
    Informative and from the "inside" of one of the parties there.

    A couple of points, though.

    The Israeli people WANT WAR with Lebanon.
     
    with

    It is the IDF and the Government that do not want war.
     
    Taking into account a particular relationships between people, Government and IDF in Israel that feels a bit awkward.
    Those three entities, in Israel, are much closer to each other than in most countries.

    Hezbollah will not be able to wage a guerrilla war against the IDF like they did in the 80s and 90s.
     
    The last time Hezbollah didn't wage guerrilla war.
    Now, the interesting speculation would be: would they fight that defensive battle if their own population base is ethnically cleansed from the region?

    As for this:

    Just a few hours ago, Israel carried out the largest bombing attack it ever has on Syria, even though you promised only a few weeks ago that Israel would never be able to bomb Syria again. Basically your side saying that the IDF can’t do something is a guarantee that the IDF will do just that.
     
    fear not.
    The resident "teams" will now "educate" you about multidimensional chess play and long term geopolitical planning.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    No name calling ?
    True, usually starts at the second "exchange", but, who knows, maybe we'll even be able to manage that till the third.
    Let's see.

    I'll go point by point...those "-".
    -Agree. That is very important and, if managed as you say, very good.
    -Agree. Works both ways though. They go for TelAviv the response becomes harsher. And the Big Brother reaction too (all help imaginable). So, mixed blessing there I guess.
    -Agree.
    -Mixed bag too. Their engagement in Syria is different, some would even say the opposite, from the future engagement against IDF. No need to explain that.

    The thing is, and I can only speculate (don't pay too much attention to all that to be honest) that the "main effort" is in Syria. So, not in preparing terrain, for example, and units on that very terrain, for the clash with IDF.
    For the force of Hezbollah type and size that could prove not good.

    People on this site love to point that US/NATO haven't been fighting a "proper" opponent for quite some. It's all about COIN, not (conventional, of course) against a decent opponent (the only one, actually Russia).
    Russia has, both in Georgia and Ukraine. Proper "real" war, not COIN.

    So same does apply to Hezbollah too.
    They, in essence, fight as a light/shock infantry for a superpower providing air support, intelligence, logistics...blah..blah.
    In the engagement against IDF all that will be totally opposite.

    But that's all not that important.

    The clash simply hinges on the will of Israelis (and Jewish world community) to get into that or not. The will to "solve the problem" with accepting a certain level of casualties.

    That document and "Greasy Williams" explained that quite well on this site.

    Now, with the latest coming from the White House anything is possible there.
    I can think about several scenarios, neither pleasant. We could see even "all against all" in that part of the world. Total mess and mayhem.
    Hopefully just only there.

    No name calling ?…Let’s see.

    I have a weak spot Peter, and it frustrates me when you fail to exploit it to make your point. It’s called reason. Anyway, so far, so good.

    -Agree. Works both ways though. They go for TelAviv the response becomes harsher.

    This is a bit of an imponderable, at least at this distance. My read is that neither the Israeli elites nor Schlomo-6-pack are all gung-ho for war on Lebanon. It is just as likely, in my mind, that missiles landing in Schlomo’s bedroom may elicit a reaction the war mongers didn’t bargain for.

    And the Big Brother reaction too (all help imaginable). So, mixed blessing there I guess.

    This is another imponderable. “War for Israel” has a much higher profile, and a much less appealing ring to it than 15 years ago.
    Also, as the US would be well aware, HZB has some big brothers too, and that the US’ entry into the conflict would have to be overt and decisive. That means war on Iran, and one wonders if they have the stomach for that. Iran has the ability to do some serious damage to American M.E. assets, especially if the Russians have been adding to their missile arsenal surreptitiously, so the risks may be very high indeed.
    Losing the 5th Fleet for the sake of supporting Israel’s unprovoked attack on Lebanon isn’t something I’d like to have to explain to the American public. The Deplorables may not take that lying down.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Greasy William

    It is just as likely, in my mind, that missiles landing in Schlomo’s bedroom may elicit a reaction the war mongers didn’t bargain for.
     
    Man you're delusional. And you know absolutely nothing about Israeli politics.


    1. The Israeli people WANT WAR with Lebanon. They don't care about how badly Hezbollah will bomb them in return. It is the IDF and the Government that do not want war.

    2. IDF plans for the next war are pretty simple: destroy every power and water plant in Lebanon (this will essentially end Lebanon as a functional country for about a decade), use terror bombing/shelling to ethnically cleanse the Lebanese people from the first 10 to 20 km of S Lebanon, send the IDF 40 to 60 km into Lebanon and finally go directly into Hezbollah's rat holes to flush Hezbollah out. Then permanently occupy a 10 to 20 km belt in Southern Lebanon. But this time, all the civilians of S Lebanon will have been killed or driven out, so Hezbollah will not be able to wage a guerrilla war against the IDF like they did in the 80s and 90s.

    3. This will cause horrific casualties for Israel. They know that and they don't care. They are not just willing to pay the price, they are eager to. You of course don't know this because you get your news for The Saker, Southfront and Sputnik.

    4. I already know your response because I have been hearing it for the last 12 years: "Nuh uh! Hezbollah is invincible and the IDF could never do that!". Yeah I know. Just like the IDF couldn't destroy the Syrian reactor or force Hamas to stop firing rockets. Just a few hours ago, Israel carried out the largest bombing attack it ever has on Syria, even though you promised only a few weeks ago that Israel would never be able to bomb Syria again. Basically your side saying that the IDF can't do something is a guarantee that the IDF will do just that.

    5. My advice? Enjoy the time you have left with your Lebanese. Their future isn't looking bright. Maybe you can put up a Lebanese refugee at your house after the next war? There is going to be millions of them.
    , @peterAUS

    I have a weak spot Peter, and it frustrates me when you fail to exploit it to make your point. It’s called reason. Anyway, so far, so good.
     
    Hehe...getting there. The second.

    ..US’ entry into the conflict would have to be overt and decisive.
     
    Don't think so. No need.

    Losing the 5th Fleet...
     
    Iranians......sinking......the.........5th ..........Fleet.
    That does it.

    Looking forward for the third.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    No name calling ?
    True, usually starts at the second "exchange", but, who knows, maybe we'll even be able to manage that till the third.
    Let's see.

    I'll go point by point...those "-".
    -Agree. That is very important and, if managed as you say, very good.
    -Agree. Works both ways though. They go for TelAviv the response becomes harsher. And the Big Brother reaction too (all help imaginable). So, mixed blessing there I guess.
    -Agree.
    -Mixed bag too. Their engagement in Syria is different, some would even say the opposite, from the future engagement against IDF. No need to explain that.

    The thing is, and I can only speculate (don't pay too much attention to all that to be honest) that the "main effort" is in Syria. So, not in preparing terrain, for example, and units on that very terrain, for the clash with IDF.
    For the force of Hezbollah type and size that could prove not good.

    People on this site love to point that US/NATO haven't been fighting a "proper" opponent for quite some. It's all about COIN, not (conventional, of course) against a decent opponent (the only one, actually Russia).
    Russia has, both in Georgia and Ukraine. Proper "real" war, not COIN.

    So same does apply to Hezbollah too.
    They, in essence, fight as a light/shock infantry for a superpower providing air support, intelligence, logistics...blah..blah.
    In the engagement against IDF all that will be totally opposite.

    But that's all not that important.

    The clash simply hinges on the will of Israelis (and Jewish world community) to get into that or not. The will to "solve the problem" with accepting a certain level of casualties.

    That document and "Greasy Williams" explained that quite well on this site.

    Now, with the latest coming from the White House anything is possible there.
    I can think about several scenarios, neither pleasant. We could see even "all against all" in that part of the world. Total mess and mayhem.
    Hopefully just only there.

    Your barely coherent comment makes me wonder what you are on. Seriously.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • No name calling ?
    True, usually starts at the second “exchange”, but, who knows, maybe we’ll even be able to manage that till the third.
    Let’s see.

    I’ll go point by point…those “-”.
    -Agree. That is very important and, if managed as you say, very good.
    -Agree. Works both ways though. They go for TelAviv the response becomes harsher. And the Big Brother reaction too (all help imaginable). So, mixed blessing there I guess.
    -Agree.
    -Mixed bag too. Their engagement in Syria is different, some would even say the opposite, from the future engagement against IDF. No need to explain that.

    The thing is, and I can only speculate (don’t pay too much attention to all that to be honest) that the “main effort” is in Syria. So, not in preparing terrain, for example, and units on that very terrain, for the clash with IDF.
    For the force of Hezbollah type and size that could prove not good.

    People on this site love to point that US/NATO haven’t been fighting a “proper” opponent for quite some. It’s all about COIN, not (conventional, of course) against a decent opponent (the only one, actually Russia).
    Russia has, both in Georgia and Ukraine. Proper “real” war, not COIN.

    So same does apply to Hezbollah too.
    They, in essence, fight as a light/shock infantry for a superpower providing air support, intelligence, logistics…blah..blah.
    In the engagement against IDF all that will be totally opposite.

    But that’s all not that important.

    The clash simply hinges on the will of Israelis (and Jewish world community) to get into that or not. The will to “solve the problem” with accepting a certain level of casualties.

    That document and “Greasy Williams” explained that quite well on this site.

    Now, with the latest coming from the White House anything is possible there.
    I can think about several scenarios, neither pleasant. We could see even “all against all” in that part of the world. Total mess and mayhem.
    Hopefully just only there.

    Read More
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    Your barely coherent comment makes me wonder what you are on. Seriously.
    , @Erebus

    No name calling ?...Let’s see.
     
    I have a weak spot Peter, and it frustrates me when you fail to exploit it to make your point. It's called reason. Anyway, so far, so good.

    -Agree. Works both ways though. They go for TelAviv the response becomes harsher.
     
    This is a bit of an imponderable, at least at this distance. My read is that neither the Israeli elites nor Schlomo-6-pack are all gung-ho for war on Lebanon. It is just as likely, in my mind, that missiles landing in Schlomo's bedroom may elicit a reaction the war mongers didn't bargain for.

    And the Big Brother reaction too (all help imaginable). So, mixed blessing there I guess.
     
    This is another imponderable. "War for Israel" has a much higher profile, and a much less appealing ring to it than 15 years ago.
    Also, as the US would be well aware, HZB has some big brothers too, and that the US' entry into the conflict would have to be overt and decisive. That means war on Iran, and one wonders if they have the stomach for that. Iran has the ability to do some serious damage to American M.E. assets, especially if the Russians have been adding to their missile arsenal surreptitiously, so the risks may be very high indeed.
    Losing the 5th Fleet for the sake of supporting Israel's unprovoked attack on Lebanon isn't something I'd like to have to explain to the American public. The Deplorables may not take that lying down.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS

    Everyone agrees that Hizbullah is now a battle hardened, combat experienced war machine.
     
    Mostly everyone. The same everyone who agrees on anything without much expertise and thinking.

    The minority who doesn't agree have a slightly different take:
    Hizbullah is now an increasingly battle weary armed group. They spend resources, including time, take casualties and gain experience not really beneficial to a future fight with the main enemy.
    They even think that Hezbollah engagement in Syria benefits Israel.

    Hizbullah is now an increasingly battle weary armed group. They spend resources, including time, take casualties and gain experience not really beneficial to a future fight with the main enemy.

    Let’s look at these 1 by 1…
    - HZB rotated their men quite effectively through the “hot zones” in Syria. Maximizing the number of “blooded” fighters without exhausting them (by & large) is generally considered sound military personnel mgmt. Most of their fighters were children in 2006, so the emotional and physical toughening of real “under fire” experience is a great advantage. What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger holds for combat troops.
    - Since 2006, they have accumulated an enormous cache of rockets and missiles, some significant portion of which apparently have the range to reach TelAviv. That alone changes the calculus of any war against them.
    - To be sure, combat means casualties, and HZB has taken their fair share in Syria. Their manpower levels, by all accounts however are well above what they had available in 2006.
    - Most importantly, their fighters and commanders also got experience and formal training in new weaponry and combined arms combat under the auspices of a professional officer corps, namely the Russians. That has to count for something, whatever the next enemy they have to fight may be.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    I hear you.
    I watched, on TV, that day, what was happening and, of course, all that since, but, in decreasing time and effort spent there.
    The problem we, interested laymen have, is that we can see experts explaining, from both sides, things we don't have education and experience to fully comprehend.And I am decently educated man (or so I say) with considerable military experience. Hell, I even had a related courses (admit, before that event) and even seen some related action (building destruction I mean).
    True, one could argue that experts tend to obfuscate things and have vested interested, but, still.

    So, in this case, yes, the point of contention is HOW?

    It is unlikely (but not impossible and it's easy to get into "lawyer speech" here) that the WTC7 was brought down the "official" way, but, it is even less unlikely that is was brought down some other way.

    Of course that a state actor could've had the building rigged. Very difficult, but possible.
    It is also possible that a combination of regulations, building practices and, yes, even a freak combination of events could've created all that.

    You know "freak waves" for example?
    For centuries seamen were saying that and all scientific community was laughing at them. I remember ships being lost in 70's and 80's with extraordinary explanations.
    And, then, we had the Draupner wave.
    Suddenly, literally overnight, the seamen of old were vindicated and scientists..experts...well...they can't get shamed..too smart for that. Too....something else but let's keep to the topic.

    At the end we, simpletons, go with probabilities.
    Now, I am talking, in this (re the " 9/11") only about the WTC7, nothing else.
    So, 70/30, for me, the "official story".

    Now, topic wise (Hezbollah/Israel).
    IDF, among some other things, is the military (or Israel as a state) which takes the "force protection" really serious. Probably more than anyone else.
    That https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namer is an interesting vehicle.
    Now, it appears interesting that IDF doesn't have Bradleys (or similar IFVs), for example. Or that U.S and the rest of NATO don't have vehicles as Namer or Achzarit.
    Anyone here willing to try to explain that?

    Once again you attempt to change the subject under discussion.

    If you take the time to watch the different available documentaries, read the books and webzine articles on 9/11 you will more clearly identify the rational information from the abundant disinformation and the outright absurd.

    History will likely show that this will have been the defining event of our lifetime. Just as with the JFK murder, you can gain insights simply by noting the rush to judgement before any conceivable investigation was possible, the covering up of evidence, the bypassing of established security protocols, the echoes of distraction from big media, the phoney investigations and the flood of disinformation designed to muddy the waters of what is really not nearly as confusing as you assume.

    Watch various videos of the collapse, you can see bursts from various demolition charges going off during the collapses and disintegrations. See what the first responder firefighters have to say about that day. Once you determine that the buildings were demolished using strategically placed demolition charges, then you can begin to see who did have had access and cover to do such a complex and lengthy operation, hint: It wasn’t OBL and his crew of flip-flop wearers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mulegino1
    Rigging a building with explosives may require a LOT, but achieving something that is virtually impossible in the real world requires even MORE. We could say, a LOT MORE.

    As Conan Doyle wrote, "When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

    Not even the authoritative voice of CNN can make the impossible possible.

    I hear you.
    I watched, on TV, that day, what was happening and, of course, all that since, but, in decreasing time and effort spent there.
    The problem we, interested laymen have, is that we can see experts explaining, from both sides, things we don’t have education and experience to fully comprehend.And I am decently educated man (or so I say) with considerable military experience. Hell, I even had a related courses (admit, before that event) and even seen some related action (building destruction I mean).
    True, one could argue that experts tend to obfuscate things and have vested interested, but, still.

    So, in this case, yes, the point of contention is HOW?

    It is unlikely (but not impossible and it’s easy to get into “lawyer speech” here) that the WTC7 was brought down the “official” way, but, it is even less unlikely that is was brought down some other way.

    Of course that a state actor could’ve had the building rigged. Very difficult, but possible.
    It is also possible that a combination of regulations, building practices and, yes, even a freak combination of events could’ve created all that.

    You know “freak waves” for example?
    For centuries seamen were saying that and all scientific community was laughing at them. I remember ships being lost in 70′s and 80′s with extraordinary explanations.
    And, then, we had the Draupner wave.
    Suddenly, literally overnight, the seamen of old were vindicated and scientists..experts…well…they can’t get shamed..too smart for that. Too….something else but let’s keep to the topic.

    At the end we, simpletons, go with probabilities.
    Now, I am talking, in this (re the ” 9/11″) only about the WTC7, nothing else.
    So, 70/30, for me, the “official story”.

    Now, topic wise (Hezbollah/Israel).
    IDF, among some other things, is the military (or Israel as a state) which takes the “force protection” really serious. Probably more than anyone else.
    That https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namer is an interesting vehicle.
    Now, it appears interesting that IDF doesn’t have Bradleys (or similar IFVs), for example. Or that U.S and the rest of NATO don’t have vehicles as Namer or Achzarit.
    Anyone here willing to try to explain that?

    Read More
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    Once again you attempt to change the subject under discussion.

    If you take the time to watch the different available documentaries, read the books and webzine articles on 9/11 you will more clearly identify the rational information from the abundant disinformation and the outright absurd.

    History will likely show that this will have been the defining event of our lifetime. Just as with the JFK murder, you can gain insights simply by noting the rush to judgement before any conceivable investigation was possible, the covering up of evidence, the bypassing of established security protocols, the echoes of distraction from big media, the phoney investigations and the flood of disinformation designed to muddy the waters of what is really not nearly as confusing as you assume.

    Watch various videos of the collapse, you can see bursts from various demolition charges going off during the collapses and disintegrations. See what the first responder firefighters have to say about that day. Once you determine that the buildings were demolished using strategically placed demolition charges, then you can begin to see who did have had access and cover to do such a complex and lengthy operation, hint: It wasn't OBL and his crew of flip-flop wearers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mulegino1
    Rigging a building with explosives may require a LOT, but achieving something that is virtually impossible in the real world requires even MORE. We could say, a LOT MORE.

    As Conan Doyle wrote, "When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

    Not even the authoritative voice of CNN can make the impossible possible.

    Exactly. As another example, however implausible one may find mass witness-coaching and mass delusion and susceptibility to propaganda (and really, how implausible are these things, governments propagandize for a simple reason, it works), the absurd claims re. places like Treblinka allow for no other conclusion.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS

    Besides, only a fool can look at the implosion of WTC 7 and claim that it is not controlled demolition.
     
    Well, I've seen, THEN, a lot of discussion about all that. Gave up after some time. Shame on me.
    All that high physics ....simply wasn't getting it.
    Sort of reminds me of, say, shooting a man. Aim, brrrp...he drops.
    And, then, you get all the high level medical professionals, spiritual leaders, guys into metaphysics even quantum mechanics trying to explain what just happened. Too much for us simple guys.

    So, in this particular case we do have a conundrum. Simpletons I mean. Guys like me.
    Feels unlikely the WTC7 collapsed simply by being on fire.
    At the other hand, it also feels......doubtful (the right word) that it was rigged. I mean, to do that requires a LOT

    Rigging a building with explosives may require a LOT, but achieving something that is virtually impossible in the real world requires even MORE. We could say, a LOT MORE.

    As Conan Doyle wrote, “When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

    Not even the authoritative voice of CNN can make the impossible possible.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Exactly. As another example, however implausible one may find mass witness-coaching and mass delusion and susceptibility to propaganda (and really, how implausible are these things, governments propagandize for a simple reason, it works), the absurd claims re. places like Treblinka allow for no other conclusion.
    , @peterAUS
    I hear you.
    I watched, on TV, that day, what was happening and, of course, all that since, but, in decreasing time and effort spent there.
    The problem we, interested laymen have, is that we can see experts explaining, from both sides, things we don't have education and experience to fully comprehend.And I am decently educated man (or so I say) with considerable military experience. Hell, I even had a related courses (admit, before that event) and even seen some related action (building destruction I mean).
    True, one could argue that experts tend to obfuscate things and have vested interested, but, still.

    So, in this case, yes, the point of contention is HOW?

    It is unlikely (but not impossible and it's easy to get into "lawyer speech" here) that the WTC7 was brought down the "official" way, but, it is even less unlikely that is was brought down some other way.

    Of course that a state actor could've had the building rigged. Very difficult, but possible.
    It is also possible that a combination of regulations, building practices and, yes, even a freak combination of events could've created all that.

    You know "freak waves" for example?
    For centuries seamen were saying that and all scientific community was laughing at them. I remember ships being lost in 70's and 80's with extraordinary explanations.
    And, then, we had the Draupner wave.
    Suddenly, literally overnight, the seamen of old were vindicated and scientists..experts...well...they can't get shamed..too smart for that. Too....something else but let's keep to the topic.

    At the end we, simpletons, go with probabilities.
    Now, I am talking, in this (re the " 9/11") only about the WTC7, nothing else.
    So, 70/30, for me, the "official story".

    Now, topic wise (Hezbollah/Israel).
    IDF, among some other things, is the military (or Israel as a state) which takes the "force protection" really serious. Probably more than anyone else.
    That https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namer is an interesting vehicle.
    Now, it appears interesting that IDF doesn't have Bradleys (or similar IFVs), for example. Or that U.S and the rest of NATO don't have vehicles as Namer or Achzarit.
    Anyone here willing to try to explain that?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    The problem with this, "WTC7" topic is that one side is rather more passionate than the other. Makes a "discussion/debate" a skewed a bit.
    Say, one states what he believes in here. One side is likely to shrug and move on; another is likely to try to "educate" him.

    So, personally, I am more inclined to believe in the official theory.

    Although it's not easy to accept that "uniqueness"(re regulations etc as ANON[436] said) it's even less easy to accept that the building was rigged before.
    Rigging it after the planes impact is just not possible.
    Using some other means, even less easy to buy.

    So, say, reluctantly, I'd go for 70/30 for the official ("uniqueness"-regulations) explanation and keep open mind for some new info in the future.
    Just me.

    Note: just saw ANON[436] comment above (143). Again, I buy it, 70/30.

    I would dare to opine that the numbers would more likely be in the 0/100 range; the odds of “climbing Mount Improbable Official 9/11″ would amount to something infinitesimally close to 0. The clincher is not the improbable flight paths, maneuvers and air speeds of the Boeing 767′s at sea level, said to be the work of amateur pilot hijackers- which could not be duplicated by experienced airline pilots in professional simulators, even though these pilots had hundreds or thousands of hours of “time in type”. Nor would the decisive argument be the unlikelihood of office fire weakening the transverse trusses causing their weakening and a localized structural failure. No, the decisive evidence against the official story is the physical impossibility of jet fuel initiated office fires causing the disintegration of most of the steel and concrete components of WTC 1, 2 (and the core of WTC 6) causing the dust clouds which blanketed lower Manhattan. No raging hydrocarbon based fire on earth- not the Windsor Tower inferno or the more recent Dubai skyscraper torch, which burned days longer than the hour or so long office fires on 9/11- has ever caused steel or concrete components to be turned to dust or disintegrated.

    Are we supposed to believe in some magical “Bin Laden Transformation” in order to accept the official story?

    The official narrative is a legend in search of Procrustean corroboration, not something likely or even possible in the real world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • L.K. -

    You are welcome to continue anyway you want, but I would suggest that most of the readers here can determine without your help which of the others is this, that, or whatever.

    I’ve been following UNZ and the issues covered here for quite some time and you are not even close to convincing with your attack on PeterAUS.

    Your opinion is shared by others, to be sure – however, that in itself means nothing. Everybody is an asshole, it depends who you ask.

    You spend too much time attacking and criticizing versus adding anything fresh.

    You’ve convinced me to skip your comments. PeterAUS is more intelligent and interesting, whether I agree with him or not.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    wrong click...
    of very careful (duh) and competent work by a lot of people.
    Some other, more exotic, explanations feel even more doubtful.

    My take anyway.

    The problem with this, “WTC7″ topic is that one side is rather more passionate than the other. Makes a “discussion/debate” a skewed a bit.
    Say, one states what he believes in here. One side is likely to shrug and move on; another is likely to try to “educate” him.

    So, personally, I am more inclined to believe in the official theory.

    Although it’s not easy to accept that “uniqueness”(re regulations etc as ANON[436] said) it’s even less easy to accept that the building was rigged before.
    Rigging it after the planes impact is just not possible.
    Using some other means, even less easy to buy.

    So, say, reluctantly, I’d go for 70/30 for the official (“uniqueness”-regulations) explanation and keep open mind for some new info in the future.
    Just me.

    Note: just saw ANON[436] comment above (143). Again, I buy it, 70/30.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    I would dare to opine that the numbers would more likely be in the 0/100 range; the odds of "climbing Mount Improbable Official 9/11" would amount to something infinitesimally close to 0. The clincher is not the improbable flight paths, maneuvers and air speeds of the Boeing 767's at sea level, said to be the work of amateur pilot hijackers- which could not be duplicated by experienced airline pilots in professional simulators, even though these pilots had hundreds or thousands of hours of "time in type". Nor would the decisive argument be the unlikelihood of office fire weakening the transverse trusses causing their weakening and a localized structural failure. No, the decisive evidence against the official story is the physical impossibility of jet fuel initiated office fires causing the disintegration of most of the steel and concrete components of WTC 1, 2 (and the core of WTC 6) causing the dust clouds which blanketed lower Manhattan. No raging hydrocarbon based fire on earth- not the Windsor Tower inferno or the more recent Dubai skyscraper torch, which burned days longer than the hour or so long office fires on 9/11- has ever caused steel or concrete components to be turned to dust or disintegrated.

    Are we supposed to believe in some magical "Bin Laden Transformation" in order to accept the official story?

    The official narrative is a legend in search of Procrustean corroboration, not something likely or even possible in the real world.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @jpb
    Since you accept credentials and authority as the deciders of truth, you can round out your one sided roundup of 9/11 talking points by reading Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

    https://www.ae911truth.org/

    Because I (correctly) question that commenter’s credentials for making authotitative seeming assertions about technical matters is no basis for your opening assertion. Assuming you are not dishonest that suggests either an IQ problem or one stemming from the company you keep. Accordingly it may be fruitless to suggest, though I do it, that you search past UR threads for convincing demonstration that your architects and engineers don’t cut the mustard (and never did… but I would be surprised if you found any heavyweight additions to that old list of non-luminaries).

    Don’t even you regard it as pathetic that M…1 is so confident of his “common sense” that he rejects the test he admits is valid wrt to the passengers and crew *even though that IS within a layman’s competence to initiate*?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    That's an interested point.

    Questions:
    Those three are the only buildings built by those standards? Anywhere? I presume not but you could supply the answer (how many, when and which) fast.
    If any of those remaining buildings get on fire, then, we can expect they'll also collapse, the same way?

    In the absence of the experience of 9/11 the answer would be yes if airliners with full fuel loads struck them at the same sort of levels or a fire started as in WTC 7 was allowed to burn all day.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS

    trolls such as yourself.

    You are not even remotely a serious person…

    Also, you are dishonest as they come…

    you became hysterical and, cornered like the rat you are

    yer constant trolling

    you, right, shyster?

    You are certainly the most pathetic keyboard commando posting here at Unz…

    your shite…

     

    Free speech "my friend".
    Advice: put me on ignore. Or take your pills before reading my posts. Or do burpees after reading them.
    Free will.

    Nah… it is fun to just expose you for the sad little liar you are…

    Btw, joker, your kind does not believe in free speech…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @L.K
    there should be a button titled "FRAUD" for trolls such as yourself.

    You are not even remotely a serious person... and you have proven it numerous times...

    Also, you are dishonest as they come...

    For example, when I posted the Guardian link to Colonel David H Hackworth's opinion on the US infantry, and he is one of the ZUS's most highly decorated soldiers, you became hysterical and, cornered like the rat you are, attacked the credibility of the Guardian!!! Nah, this is just some lefty newspaper!! Complete meltdown...
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/29/afghanistan.terrorism2
    America's 'elite' troops
    So how come the country's most decorated soldier thinks they are only good for playing video games?


    Fast forward to some of yer constant trolling under the Saker's pieces - get a life already - and then you actually used the very same The Guardian in order to attack Russia!!
    So suddenly, that leftist rag was good enough for you, right, shyster?

    You are certainly the most pathetic keyboard commando posting here at Unz... I don't know who the hell you think u impress with your shite...

    trolls such as yourself.

    You are not even remotely a serious person…

    Also, you are dishonest as they come…

    you became hysterical and, cornered like the rat you are

    yer constant trolling

    you, right, shyster?

    You are certainly the most pathetic keyboard commando posting here at Unz…

    your shite…

    Free speech “my friend”.
    Advice: put me on ignore. Or take your pills before reading my posts. Or do burpees after reading them.
    Free will.

    Read More
    • Replies: @L.K
    Nah... it is fun to just expose you for the sad little liar you are...

    Btw, joker, your kind does not believe in free speech...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7iBmLsbhR8
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS

    Besides, only a fool can look at the implosion of WTC 7 and claim that it is not controlled demolition.
     
    Well, I've seen, THEN, a lot of discussion about all that. Gave up after some time. Shame on me.
    All that high physics ....simply wasn't getting it.
    Sort of reminds me of, say, shooting a man. Aim, brrrp...he drops.
    And, then, you get all the high level medical professionals, spiritual leaders, guys into metaphysics even quantum mechanics trying to explain what just happened. Too much for us simple guys.

    So, in this particular case we do have a conundrum. Simpletons I mean. Guys like me.
    Feels unlikely the WTC7 collapsed simply by being on fire.
    At the other hand, it also feels......doubtful (the right word) that it was rigged. I mean, to do that requires a LOT

    wrong click…
    of very careful (duh) and competent work by a lot of people.
    Some other, more exotic, explanations feel even more doubtful.

    My take anyway.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    The problem with this, "WTC7" topic is that one side is rather more passionate than the other. Makes a "discussion/debate" a skewed a bit.
    Say, one states what he believes in here. One side is likely to shrug and move on; another is likely to try to "educate" him.

    So, personally, I am more inclined to believe in the official theory.

    Although it's not easy to accept that "uniqueness"(re regulations etc as ANON[436] said) it's even less easy to accept that the building was rigged before.
    Rigging it after the planes impact is just not possible.
    Using some other means, even less easy to buy.

    So, say, reluctantly, I'd go for 70/30 for the official ("uniqueness"-regulations) explanation and keep open mind for some new info in the future.
    Just me.

    Note: just saw ANON[436] comment above (143). Again, I buy it, 70/30.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mulegino1
    Refuting your meretricious shilling for the establishment is pretty effortless.

    The ballistics argument is entirely valid. Once any flying object, whether it is an arrow, a rock, a bullet or an airliner is used as a weapon, then ballistics enter the equation. A commercial Boeing 767 would make a very poor armor piercing bullet. And structural steel can definitely be considered armor. The soft and hollow carbon nose cone of a 767 can be severely damaged by colliding with a bird in flight at cruising speed. It would not be very adept at penetrating the structural steel perimeter columns, spandrels and concrete pans of WTC 2, now would it? It does not matter if it is "solid stuff". The perimeter columns and concrete of the WTC are much more solid and rigid than the hollow and thin skinned fuselage of a 767. Compare a 767 to an armor piercing round which can indeed pierce 1/2" (1/4"+1/4")- a hollow and light ductile aluminium cylinder with quite delicate wings whose tips are so delicate they cannot bear any more load than the running lights, to the hardened alloy tip, tungsten metal jacket and solid steel core of an armor piercing round. Invoking "solid stuff" is a rather nebulous evasion.

    Also, even NIST acknowledges that WTC 7 fell at free fall acceleration. This is stunning. Office fires and flying debris are not capable of removing all underlying support of a steel and concrete skyscraper, which is what "free fall" entails. Besides, only a fool can look at the implosion of WTC 7 and claim that it is not controlled demolition.

    As for the molecular dissociation of most of the steel and concrete, that simply means that the compounds were disintegrated, as one of the signature elements of the dust- particles of free iron- demonstrate conclusively. That was the dust cloud that blanketed lower Manhattan- the disintegrated components of the WTC. No hydrocarbon based office fire or gravity collapse on earth can do this.

    Besides, only a fool can look at the implosion of WTC 7 and claim that it is not controlled demolition.

    Well, I’ve seen, THEN, a lot of discussion about all that. Gave up after some time. Shame on me.
    All that high physics ….simply wasn’t getting it.
    Sort of reminds me of, say, shooting a man. Aim, brrrp…he drops.
    And, then, you get all the high level medical professionals, spiritual leaders, guys into metaphysics even quantum mechanics trying to explain what just happened. Too much for us simple guys.

    So, in this particular case we do have a conundrum. Simpletons I mean. Guys like me.
    Feels unlikely the WTC7 collapsed simply by being on fire.
    At the other hand, it also feels……doubtful (the right word) that it was rigged. I mean, to do that requires a LOT

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    wrong click...
    of very careful (duh) and competent work by a lot of people.
    Some other, more exotic, explanations feel even more doubtful.

    My take anyway.
    , @Mulegino1
    Rigging a building with explosives may require a LOT, but achieving something that is virtually impossible in the real world requires even MORE. We could say, a LOT MORE.

    As Conan Doyle wrote, "When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

    Not even the authoritative voice of CNN can make the impossible possible.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • L.K says:
    @peterAUS

    Everyone agrees that Hizbullah is now a battle hardened, combat experienced war machine.
     
    Mostly everyone. The same everyone who agrees on anything without much expertise and thinking.

    The minority who doesn't agree have a slightly different take:
    Hizbullah is now an increasingly battle weary armed group. They spend resources, including time, take casualties and gain experience not really beneficial to a future fight with the main enemy.
    They even think that Hezbollah engagement in Syria benefits Israel.

    there should be a button titled “FRAUD” for trolls such as yourself.

    You are not even remotely a serious person… and you have proven it numerous times…

    Also, you are dishonest as they come…

    For example, when I posted the Guardian link to Colonel David H Hackworth’s opinion on the US infantry, and he is one of the ZUS’s most highly decorated soldiers, you became hysterical and, cornered like the rat you are, attacked the credibility of the Guardian!!! Nah, this is just some lefty newspaper!! Complete meltdown…

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/29/afghanistan.terrorism2

    America’s ‘elite’ troops
    So how come the country’s most decorated soldier thinks they are only good for playing video games?

    Fast forward to some of yer constant trolling under the Saker’s pieces – get a life already – and then you actually used the very same The Guardian in order to attack Russia!!
    So suddenly, that leftist rag was good enough for you, right, shyster?

    You are certainly the most pathetic keyboard commando posting here at Unz… I don’t know who the hell you think u impress with your shite…

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    trolls such as yourself.

    You are not even remotely a serious person…

    Also, you are dishonest as they come…

    you became hysterical and, cornered like the rat you are

    yer constant trolling

    you, right, shyster?

    You are certainly the most pathetic keyboard commando posting here at Unz…

    your shite…

     

    Free speech "my friend".
    Advice: put me on ignore. Or take your pills before reading my posts. Or do burpees after reading them.
    Free will.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    What are your personal engineering qualifications to make the assertions you do as if you were an expert witness? Clearly none, so why should I accord them any weight rather than rely on inter alia better qualified unbiased sources whom I am acquainted with?

    Assuming you claim no personal expertise can you say how much time you have spent in serious discussion of the subject with qualified experts. (It is a long time since I studied relevant physics, chemistry and applied math but I have had enough experience of expert witnesses not to regard mere cocktsil party observations by them as useful).

    Since you accept credentials and authority as the deciders of truth, you can round out your one sided roundup of 9/11 talking points by reading Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

    https://www.ae911truth.org/

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Because I (correctly) question that commenter's credentials for making authotitative seeming assertions about technical matters is no basis for your opening assertion. Assuming you are not dishonest that suggests either an IQ problem or one stemming from the company you keep. Accordingly it may be fruitless to suggest, though I do it, that you search past UR threads for convincing demonstration that your architects and engineers don't cut the mustard (and never did... but I would be surprised if you found any heavyweight additions to that old list of non-luminaries).

    Don't even you regard it as pathetic that M...1 is so confident of his "common sense" that he rejects the test he admits is valid wrt to the passengers and crew *even though that IS within a layman's competence to initiate*?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mulegino1
    The official story "prevails" only in the imagination of that portion of the public that is too lazy or ignorant to either care or look into the facts, which clearly prove it to be an utter fantasy.

    You are correct about the "test", but such a thing would be superfluous. Anyone familiar with rudimentary ballistics knows that, in order to penetrate structural steel, armor piercing ammunition is required. What kind of round is capable of penetrating a perimeter box column at the alleged point of impact of WTC 2? We are talking about 1/2" of structural steel (not to mention the steel spandrels, which were much thicker and stronger). Would it be a hollow aluminum bullet with a rounded nose (which is what a Boeing 767 was) or an armor piercing round with a sharpened and hardened alloy tip, an alloy jacket and a solid steel core? Since the airliners were allegedly used as missiles, then ballistics enters into the equation.

    But the above is only one in a series of questions. Can a building collapse due to fire damage? Of course it can. Has a steel and concrete skyscraper-other than WTC 1,2 and 7- ever collapsed due to hydrocarbon based fire damage? No. What is the likelihood that twin towers x and z would- although supposedly struck in different areas and levels, "collapse" in the exact same symmetrical manner and approaching (or even exceeding) free fall acceleration- and that most of their steel and concrete components would experience molecular dissociation and form a cloud of hot, toxic dust due to "office fires"? Zero.

    The official story “prevails” only in the imagination of that portion of the public that is too lazy or ignorant to either care or look into the facts, which clearly prove it to be an utter fantasy.

    Or too afraid.
    Fear of unbridled power can be a very good motivator there. And, interestingly enough, it works very well with really intelligent and educated people.
    Just a thought. Not mine, mind you, some other people explained it well somewhere some time ago.I just agree.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @MEexpert

    This is because combat does not take place on paper, it involves tons of different variables and the end result can often be counter intuitive.
     
    So you think for the past 12 years Hizbullah has been sitting home drawing combat pictures? Or, do you think the War in Syria wasn't a real war? Everyone agrees that Hizbullah is now a battle hardened, combat experienced war machine. That is why in spite of all the rhetoric, Israel has not dared to make any move against Hizbullah.

    Everyone agrees that Hizbullah is now a battle hardened, combat experienced war machine.

    Mostly everyone. The same everyone who agrees on anything without much expertise and thinking.

    The minority who doesn’t agree have a slightly different take:
    Hizbullah is now an increasingly battle weary armed group. They spend resources, including time, take casualties and gain experience not really beneficial to a future fight with the main enemy.
    They even think that Hezbollah engagement in Syria benefits Israel.

    Read More
    • LOL: L.K
    • Replies: @L.K
    there should be a button titled "FRAUD" for trolls such as yourself.

    You are not even remotely a serious person... and you have proven it numerous times...

    Also, you are dishonest as they come...

    For example, when I posted the Guardian link to Colonel David H Hackworth's opinion on the US infantry, and he is one of the ZUS's most highly decorated soldiers, you became hysterical and, cornered like the rat you are, attacked the credibility of the Guardian!!! Nah, this is just some lefty newspaper!! Complete meltdown...
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/29/afghanistan.terrorism2
    America's 'elite' troops
    So how come the country's most decorated soldier thinks they are only good for playing video games?


    Fast forward to some of yer constant trolling under the Saker's pieces - get a life already - and then you actually used the very same The Guardian in order to attack Russia!!
    So suddenly, that leftist rag was good enough for you, right, shyster?

    You are certainly the most pathetic keyboard commando posting here at Unz... I don't know who the hell you think u impress with your shite...
    , @Erebus

    Hizbullah is now an increasingly battle weary armed group. They spend resources, including time, take casualties and gain experience not really beneficial to a future fight with the main enemy.
     
    Let's look at these 1 by 1...
    - HZB rotated their men quite effectively through the "hot zones" in Syria. Maximizing the number of "blooded" fighters without exhausting them (by & large) is generally considered sound military personnel mgmt. Most of their fighters were children in 2006, so the emotional and physical toughening of real "under fire" experience is a great advantage. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger holds for combat troops.
    - Since 2006, they have accumulated an enormous cache of rockets and missiles, some significant portion of which apparently have the range to reach TelAviv. That alone changes the calculus of any war against them.
    - To be sure, combat means casualties, and HZB has taken their fair share in Syria. Their manpower levels, by all accounts however are well above what they had available in 2006.
    - Most importantly, their fighters and commanders also got experience and formal training in new weaponry and combined arms combat under the auspices of a professional officer corps, namely the Russians. That has to count for something, whatever the next enemy they have to fight may be.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ANON
    Yep. WTC 1 and WTC 2. Study the 1960s changes in regs under whuch they were built.

    That’s an interested point.

    Questions:
    Those three are the only buildings built by those standards? Anywhere? I presume not but you could supply the answer (how many, when and which) fast.
    If any of those remaining buildings get on fire, then, we can expect they’ll also collapse, the same way?

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANON
    In the absence of the experience of 9/11 the answer would be yes if airliners with full fuel loads struck them at the same sort of levels or a fire started as in WTC 7 was allowed to burn all day.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    I can't be bothered wasting time on such clueless parroting of amateur truther stuff. But I will just point out what should be obvious to you on reflection.

    1. The ballistic comparison is nonsense. The most obvious reason is that what it takes to make a hole in a steel plate has little relation to what it takes to collapse a steel frame or grid by thrusting many tons of solid stuff at 500 mph between upright members.

    2. The free fall argument is equally rubbish as what anyone could see or photograph after disintegrating concrete and other materials were propelled out from the side of the building was inevitably going to be in free fall (the horizontal vector being irrelevant to thst as even a scientific ignoramus should know) and of course that huge cloud of dust obscured the (slightly) slower collapsing lower floors:

    3. Your "molecular dissociation" is also bizarre - whatever you think it means. Molecules are, apart from subatomic particles, the smallest parts of matter and invisible to the naked eye. The existence of visible dust is inconsistent with declumping by dissociation into independent unattached molecules!

    What nutters and loony tunes do you listen to? Have you no standards by which you can judge whether someone spouts confident nonsense?

    Refuting your meretricious shilling for the establishment is pretty effortless.

    The ballistics argument is entirely valid. Once any flying object, whether it is an arrow, a rock, a bullet or an airliner is used as a weapon, then ballistics enter the equation. A commercial Boeing 767 would make a very poor armor piercing bullet. And structural steel can definitely be considered armor. The soft and hollow carbon nose cone of a 767 can be severely damaged by colliding with a bird in flight at cruising speed. It would not be very adept at penetrating the structural steel perimeter columns, spandrels and concrete pans of WTC 2, now would it? It does not matter if it is “solid stuff”. The perimeter columns and concrete of the WTC are much more solid and rigid than the hollow and thin skinned fuselage of a 767. Compare a 767 to an armor piercing round which can indeed pierce 1/2″ (1/4″+1/4″)- a hollow and light ductile aluminium cylinder with quite delicate wings whose tips are so delicate they cannot bear any more load than the running lights, to the hardened alloy tip, tungsten metal jacket and solid steel core of an armor piercing round. Invoking “solid stuff” is a rather nebulous evasion.

    Also, even NIST acknowledges that WTC 7 fell at free fall acceleration. This is stunning. Office fires and flying debris are not capable of removing all underlying support of a steel and concrete skyscraper, which is what “free fall” entails. Besides, only a fool can look at the implosion of WTC 7 and claim that it is not controlled demolition.

    As for the molecular dissociation of most of the steel and concrete, that simply means that the compounds were disintegrated, as one of the signature elements of the dust- particles of free iron- demonstrate conclusively. That was the dust cloud that blanketed lower Manhattan- the disintegrated components of the WTC. No hydrocarbon based office fire or gravity collapse on earth can do this.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    Besides, only a fool can look at the implosion of WTC 7 and claim that it is not controlled demolition.
     
    Well, I've seen, THEN, a lot of discussion about all that. Gave up after some time. Shame on me.
    All that high physics ....simply wasn't getting it.
    Sort of reminds me of, say, shooting a man. Aim, brrrp...he drops.
    And, then, you get all the high level medical professionals, spiritual leaders, guys into metaphysics even quantum mechanics trying to explain what just happened. Too much for us simple guys.

    So, in this particular case we do have a conundrum. Simpletons I mean. Guys like me.
    Feels unlikely the WTC7 collapsed simply by being on fire.
    At the other hand, it also feels......doubtful (the right word) that it was rigged. I mean, to do that requires a LOT
    , @anon
    I have been laid up and amusing myself watching TV documentaries including three National Geographic "Air Crash Investigations". One of them I already knew a lot about and I found the National Geographic doco very good and accurate. Not that that mattered for present pirposes because what gave the lie to your nonsense about ballistics and armour piercing bullets was just the pictures of where large parts of the fuselage had plunged into the ground at 500 knots. The one at Lockerbie was huge - and specifically, deep, and the one 65km west of New Delhi in 1996 had the cockpit and forward part of the fuselage of a 747 so deeply embedded in the earth, despite it having become detached and fallen under gravity, that it took days if not weeks to get to the black boxes.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    What are your personal engineering qualifications to make the assertions you do as if you were an expert witness? Clearly none, so why should I accord them any weight rather than rely on inter alia better qualified unbiased sources whom I am acquainted with?

    Assuming you claim no personal expertise can you say how much time you have spent in serious discussion of the subject with qualified experts. (It is a long time since I studied relevant physics, chemistry and applied math but I have had enough experience of expert witnesses not to regard mere cocktsil party observations by them as useful).

    Your credentialism is entirely predictable, but not at all convincing. Common sense and a knowledge of firefighting engineering tells me that the structural steel and concrete components of structures are not disintegrated and turned to dust by hydrocarbon based office fires initiated by jet fuel. Yet this happened- or is alleged to have happened- on 9/11.

    Also, common sense and a perusal of the history of gravity collapses of structures tells me that such collapses due to external and internal damage – perhaps due to fire- do not occur symmetrically, instantaneously and- especially with respect to steel framed and concrete structures- universally. It would have been reasonable to expect a partial and asymmetrical collapse of some of the upper floors of the Twin Towers. It would be absurd to expect what really happened- the buildings instantaneously, symmetrically and universally “collapsing” (actually they were exploding from within) at close to (or even exceeding) free fall acceleration.

    To be a juror in a criminal case, it is not necessary to be an “expert witness” but to have and exercise common sense, critical thinking skills and a modicum of knowledge. In your case, you have confused your shilling for official (and patently absurd) narratives with critical thinking and common sense, two qualities which you appear to be deficient in.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mulegino1
    The official story "prevails" only in the imagination of that portion of the public that is too lazy or ignorant to either care or look into the facts, which clearly prove it to be an utter fantasy.

    You are correct about the "test", but such a thing would be superfluous. Anyone familiar with rudimentary ballistics knows that, in order to penetrate structural steel, armor piercing ammunition is required. What kind of round is capable of penetrating a perimeter box column at the alleged point of impact of WTC 2? We are talking about 1/2" of structural steel (not to mention the steel spandrels, which were much thicker and stronger). Would it be a hollow aluminum bullet with a rounded nose (which is what a Boeing 767 was) or an armor piercing round with a sharpened and hardened alloy tip, an alloy jacket and a solid steel core? Since the airliners were allegedly used as missiles, then ballistics enters into the equation.

    But the above is only one in a series of questions. Can a building collapse due to fire damage? Of course it can. Has a steel and concrete skyscraper-other than WTC 1,2 and 7- ever collapsed due to hydrocarbon based fire damage? No. What is the likelihood that twin towers x and z would- although supposedly struck in different areas and levels, "collapse" in the exact same symmetrical manner and approaching (or even exceeding) free fall acceleration- and that most of their steel and concrete components would experience molecular dissociation and form a cloud of hot, toxic dust due to "office fires"? Zero.

    I can’t be bothered wasting time on such clueless parroting of amateur truther stuff. But I will just point out what should be obvious to you on reflection.

    1. The ballistic comparison is nonsense. The most obvious reason is that what it takes to make a hole in a steel plate has little relation to what it takes to collapse a steel frame or grid by thrusting many tons of solid stuff at 500 mph between upright members.

    2. The free fall argument is equally rubbish as what anyone could see or photograph after disintegrating concrete and other materials were propelled out from the side of the building was inevitably going to be in free fall (the horizontal vector being irrelevant to thst as even a scientific ignoramus should know) and of course that huge cloud of dust obscured the (slightly) slower collapsing lower floors:

    3. Your “molecular dissociation” is also bizarre – whatever you think it means. Molecules are, apart from subatomic particles, the smallest parts of matter and invisible to the naked eye. The existence of visible dust is inconsistent with declumping by dissociation into independent unattached molecules!

    What nutters and loony tunes do you listen to? Have you no standards by which you can judge whether someone spouts confident nonsense?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    Refuting your meretricious shilling for the establishment is pretty effortless.

    The ballistics argument is entirely valid. Once any flying object, whether it is an arrow, a rock, a bullet or an airliner is used as a weapon, then ballistics enter the equation. A commercial Boeing 767 would make a very poor armor piercing bullet. And structural steel can definitely be considered armor. The soft and hollow carbon nose cone of a 767 can be severely damaged by colliding with a bird in flight at cruising speed. It would not be very adept at penetrating the structural steel perimeter columns, spandrels and concrete pans of WTC 2, now would it? It does not matter if it is "solid stuff". The perimeter columns and concrete of the WTC are much more solid and rigid than the hollow and thin skinned fuselage of a 767. Compare a 767 to an armor piercing round which can indeed pierce 1/2" (1/4"+1/4")- a hollow and light ductile aluminium cylinder with quite delicate wings whose tips are so delicate they cannot bear any more load than the running lights, to the hardened alloy tip, tungsten metal jacket and solid steel core of an armor piercing round. Invoking "solid stuff" is a rather nebulous evasion.

    Also, even NIST acknowledges that WTC 7 fell at free fall acceleration. This is stunning. Office fires and flying debris are not capable of removing all underlying support of a steel and concrete skyscraper, which is what "free fall" entails. Besides, only a fool can look at the implosion of WTC 7 and claim that it is not controlled demolition.

    As for the molecular dissociation of most of the steel and concrete, that simply means that the compounds were disintegrated, as one of the signature elements of the dust- particles of free iron- demonstrate conclusively. That was the dust cloud that blanketed lower Manhattan- the disintegrated components of the WTC. No hydrocarbon based office fire or gravity collapse on earth can do this.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mulegino1
    What is for you "obvious" is certainly not "right", since it is merely an officially sanctioned narrative manufactured by the media at the behest of officialdom, constructed from the top down, unlike a real case constructed upon a painstaking evaluation of factual evidence. The narrative starts out with a media driven pronouncement, "Osama bin Laden, box cutters, 19 hijackers, commercial airliners hitting buildings, collapse due to office fires, etc."

    In reality, there were no "collapses." The destruction of WTC 1, 2, 7 (along with the entire core of WTC 6) did not involve "collapses", it involved the disintegration of most of the metallic and concrete components of the Twin Towers via explosive energy, and the implosion of WTC 7 in a more conventional manner. When dealing with steel and concrete skyscrapers, fire damage is never going to lead to symmetrical and universal collapse at free fall acceleration. It will not happen and it did not happen on 9/11.

    What are your personal engineering qualifications to make the assertions you do as if you were an expert witness? Clearly none, so why should I accord them any weight rather than rely on inter alia better qualified unbiased sources whom I am acquainted with?

    Assuming you claim no personal expertise can you say how much time you have spent in serious discussion of the subject with qualified experts. (It is a long time since I studied relevant physics, chemistry and applied math but I have had enough experience of expert witnesses not to regard mere cocktsil party observations by them as useful).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    Your credentialism is entirely predictable, but not at all convincing. Common sense and a knowledge of firefighting engineering tells me that the structural steel and concrete components of structures are not disintegrated and turned to dust by hydrocarbon based office fires initiated by jet fuel. Yet this happened- or is alleged to have happened- on 9/11.

    Also, common sense and a perusal of the history of gravity collapses of structures tells me that such collapses due to external and internal damage - perhaps due to fire- do not occur symmetrically, instantaneously and- especially with respect to steel framed and concrete structures- universally. It would have been reasonable to expect a partial and asymmetrical collapse of some of the upper floors of the Twin Towers. It would be absurd to expect what really happened- the buildings instantaneously, symmetrically and universally "collapsing" (actually they were exploding from within) at close to (or even exceeding) free fall acceleration.

    To be a juror in a criminal case, it is not necessary to be an "expert witness" but to have and exercise common sense, critical thinking skills and a modicum of knowledge. In your case, you have confused your shilling for official (and patently absurd) narratives with critical thinking and common sense, two qualities which you appear to be deficient in.

    , @jpb
    Since you accept credentials and authority as the deciders of truth, you can round out your one sided roundup of 9/11 talking points by reading Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

    https://www.ae911truth.org/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wizard of Oz
    The "official story" prevails but could be blown out of the water by proof that the flights said to be involved never had substantial passenger or crew lists of people who were killed. Any half decent lawyer could get hold of those lists and make it possible to do at least an adequate sample check with probate records, death certificate, obituaries, family.

    As I have noted the official story prevails. The ball is in your court. If you are a serious person stop w**king on the www and organise a test.

    The official story “prevails” only in the imagination of that portion of the public that is too lazy or ignorant to either care or look into the facts, which clearly prove it to be an utter fantasy.

    You are correct about the “test”, but such a thing would be superfluous. Anyone familiar with rudimentary ballistics knows that, in order to penetrate structural steel, armor piercing ammunition is required. What kind of round is capable of penetrating a perimeter box column at the alleged point of impact of WTC 2? We are talking about 1/2″ of structural steel (not to mention the steel spandrels, which were much thicker and stronger). Would it be a hollow aluminum bullet with a rounded nose (which is what a Boeing 767 was) or an armor piercing round with a sharpened and hardened alloy tip, an alloy jacket and a solid steel core? Since the airliners were allegedly used as missiles, then ballistics enters into the equation.

    But the above is only one in a series of questions. Can a building collapse due to fire damage? Of course it can. Has a steel and concrete skyscraper-other than WTC 1,2 and 7- ever collapsed due to hydrocarbon based fire damage? No. What is the likelihood that twin towers x and z would- although supposedly struck in different areas and levels, “collapse” in the exact same symmetrical manner and approaching (or even exceeding) free fall acceleration- and that most of their steel and concrete components would experience molecular dissociation and form a cloud of hot, toxic dust due to “office fires”? Zero.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    I can't be bothered wasting time on such clueless parroting of amateur truther stuff. But I will just point out what should be obvious to you on reflection.

    1. The ballistic comparison is nonsense. The most obvious reason is that what it takes to make a hole in a steel plate has little relation to what it takes to collapse a steel frame or grid by thrusting many tons of solid stuff at 500 mph between upright members.

    2. The free fall argument is equally rubbish as what anyone could see or photograph after disintegrating concrete and other materials were propelled out from the side of the building was inevitably going to be in free fall (the horizontal vector being irrelevant to thst as even a scientific ignoramus should know) and of course that huge cloud of dust obscured the (slightly) slower collapsing lower floors:

    3. Your "molecular dissociation" is also bizarre - whatever you think it means. Molecules are, apart from subatomic particles, the smallest parts of matter and invisible to the naked eye. The existence of visible dust is inconsistent with declumping by dissociation into independent unattached molecules!

    What nutters and loony tunes do you listen to? Have you no standards by which you can judge whether someone spouts confident nonsense?

    , @peterAUS

    The official story “prevails” only in the imagination of that portion of the public that is too lazy or ignorant to either care or look into the facts, which clearly prove it to be an utter fantasy.
     
    Or too afraid.
    Fear of unbridled power can be a very good motivator there. And, interestingly enough, it works very well with really intelligent and educated people.
    Just a thought. Not mine, mind you, some other people explained it well somewhere some time ago.I just agree.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    Can't argue that.
    Could you argue that the public was deliberately lied to re Iraqi WMDs?

    That, sometimes, "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy".

    Now, in this particular example, "WTC 7", things are, IMHO, not as clear cut as we are led to believe by MSM.

    So, true, I can be called anything anyone here wants. Fine with me. In fact, if my opinion wasn't pissing at least somebody around I'd feel something was missing.

    So...in this case something isn't quite right.

    As I said....I can not find ONE example of similar case.

    And,well, maybe I don't know much about making buildings. But, I am absolutely positive that I do know more about destroying them than 90 % of posters here. Probably even 95. Anyone here completed just a basic demolition course, for example? Let alone knowing something about effects of weaponry on modern buildings etc. I mean, that's the part of another course I spout I completed, MOUT/FIBUA related. Or, "how to bring that building down".

    So, to keep this funny, I'd really like to know that combination of ...things...that brought that building down.
    Say, the mission is to destroy a strongpoint to advance further into the city. The strongpoint is a building as WTC7 manned by a company of enemy. Too costly to assault, let's reduce it. HOW?
    Well, the usual is: from decent bombing from air, through very decent direct artillery fire (at least 150 mm), to sending a combat assault engineers in. Not bad if you weren't one of them.
    Option "WTC7": suppress the building and send a helicopter gunship with a...canister....with those ingredients that brought down the "original". Drop and watch.
    That's for the First World military.

    For some...ahm...other "militaries" of this world that knowledge would be invaluable re race/religion/ethnicity warfare. Say, destroy the town...... Using "WTC7" method is simple, cheap and fast.

    The WTC towers and other buildings ie WTC buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 were destroyed by a particle beam weapon, see Dr. Judy Wood.com.

    The ones behind the attack on 911 were Israel and the Zionist controlled deep state.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    I'm not interested in the official story but in the sometimes absurd contortions people go through to uphold a view that the obvious isn't right. The obvious starts with people, principally Osama bin Laden, who wish America harm and have both willing "martyrs" volunteering and a track record of similar suicide attacks. Those who don't like what follows include an amazing number of the truly deluded like those who think it was all CGI. Others though not deluded fail to see many important answers to their usually third hand objections. For an example that I haven't seen addressed before, some truthers pour derision on the idea that four or five men with no more formidable a weapon than a boxcutter could have highjacked a plane. What they overlook was not only the unpreparedness of everyone for such attacks but, specifically, the obvious presumption by all those on board in 2001 that the highjacking is for ransom or for escape to another country. So the reaction would have been initially not to raise the temperature and to stay calm oneself.

    You seem to have learned some of the elementary psychology behind people sticking to bad arguments but fail to apply it to yourself.

    What is for you “obvious” is certainly not “right”, since it is merely an officially sanctioned narrative manufactured by the media at the behest of officialdom, constructed from the top down, unlike a real case constructed upon a painstaking evaluation of factual evidence. The narrative starts out with a media driven pronouncement, “Osama bin Laden, box cutters, 19 hijackers, commercial airliners hitting buildings, collapse due to office fires, etc.”

    In reality, there were no “collapses.” The destruction of WTC 1, 2, 7 (along with the entire core of WTC 6) did not involve “collapses”, it involved the disintegration of most of the metallic and concrete components of the Twin Towers via explosive energy, and the implosion of WTC 7 in a more conventional manner. When dealing with steel and concrete skyscrapers, fire damage is never going to lead to symmetrical and universal collapse at free fall acceleration. It will not happen and it did not happen on 9/11.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    What are your personal engineering qualifications to make the assertions you do as if you were an expert witness? Clearly none, so why should I accord them any weight rather than rely on inter alia better qualified unbiased sources whom I am acquainted with?

    Assuming you claim no personal expertise can you say how much time you have spent in serious discussion of the subject with qualified experts. (It is a long time since I studied relevant physics, chemistry and applied math but I have had enough experience of expert witnesses not to regard mere cocktsil party observations by them as useful).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon[547] • Disclaimer says:

    I see that my comment has stimulated several comments. Of course, I am not going to debate with militant Zionist because it is pointless. Is he Israeli or Jew or whatever or not, I dont know,because one doesnt have to be Israeli to be quite agressive, but I dont have a feeling that he had experienced real war or worse, a horror bombardment which I did. I know very well what does it mean when f16 flies over your head and dropping bombs on your village. As for others,and those who are Lebanese who do not share my opinion (and why should everyone think like me after all)..you know,I cant say that I adore this or that politician,or party and so on. Moreover,I dislike this old-minded emigration that lives in the past. I am also emigree since 2008,although I have a lot of family at home,and I am traveling back several times per year. However,at least I have a respect for everyone in Lebanon,because it belongs to all Lebanese. It does not belong to Zionists,of course,nor takfiris nor any other colonialist power. It used to be that way,and that brought a lot of misery to our sacred land. therefore,there is one historical lesson that we have learned.. The best way to be left alone is to be strong enough,dangerous enough so nobody with bad attitude cannot touch you. That is main reason why Resistance exists. As for Zionist,I have only one message,if you attack,there are lot of surprises that awaits you..of course,I have no idea what is going on around me,but I wouldnt try..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @L.K
    In the study "Back to Basics", US Lieutenant Colonel Scott C. Farquhar, wrote:

    American professional military personnel are well-acquainted with “the arrogant show of strength” that was Task Force Smith in Korea in the summer of 1950 and of its fate. A similar result occurred when the vaunted IDF attacked into Lebanon in 2006 against the guerrilla army of Hezbollah: a firstworld army was fought to a standstill by a tough and determined enemy despite overwhelming air power. The IDF pitted ill-trained soldiers and ill-educated officers, who attempted to carry out vague orders and unfamiliar tasks, against a small group of men with good weapons and a simple mission.
     
    He examines the IOF supposed improvements after the 2006 defeat and its better performance against the Palestinians trapped in Gaza during operation Cast Lead, in late December 2008-January 2009, but cautions that Hamas was much weaker than Hezbollah:

    ...Hezbollah presented the Israelis with a well trained, well led and suitably equipped force with sufficient space to defend in depth. Hamas was inadequately trained and poorly led with little space to trade for producing Israeli casualties.... Conversely, as in the case of Hamas, an underequipped, ill trained and poorly commanded opponent can be an annoyance—but it will not stand long against significant national power. Hamas presented the Israelis with a poor imitation of Hezbollah...
     

    The difference between the mighty Israeli army and the little Hizbullah army is that of leadership. The fat cat generals of Israeli army can hardly move with all those heavy medals, won during all the wars against unarmed Palestinians, pinned on their chests while, the Hizbullah army is led by a black turbaned and black-robed simple soldier with only the medal of his faith pinned in his heart.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Greasy William

    As a Lebanese, my only comment is that the writer of the article has described the feeling and general mood in Lebanon very accurate.
     
    And as a Jew, I just want to say: we're coming for you.

    You say the mood in the country is good. Let's see how good it is after the next war when we have destroyed every power and water plant in your country and ethnically cleansed the southern portion of it. And you won't have the Saudis to pay for reconstruction this time.

    Get used to living like a Gazan.

    Let’s see how good it is after the next war when we have destroyed every power and water plant in your country and ethnically cleansed the southern portion of it.

    Then why haven’t you? The brave little country didn’t even have the courage to attack Lebanon while Hizbullah was busy wiping out ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Furthermore, Israel is only good for destroying infrastructure. The Israelis can’t face the real army.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Greasy William

    Hezbollah is much larger and stronger now than in 2006.
     
    Do you like boxing? Do you remember a fighter from the 80's named Marvin Hagler?

    In 1981, Hagler defended his middleweight title against Syrian contender Mustafa Hamsho. Hamsho was a big strong middleweight, possibly the physically strongest middleweight ever. He was tough and he was determined to win, but Hagler proved to be just too skilled and Hagler brutally won the fight by TKO in round 11.

    3 years later Hagler was clearly starting to slide, but Hamsho had noticeably improved. He was showing head movement in his fights and not taking nearly as much punishment. He was a better fighter and in the 3 years since his loss to Hagler, he had won big fights that earned him another shot at the title.

    The result? Hamsho got knocked out in the 3rd round. So even though he was better and Hagler was worse, Hagler scored an even bigger victory. This is because combat does not take place on paper, it involves tons of different variables and the end result can often be counter intuitive.

    Do you see where I'm going with this?

    Is Hezbollah stronger today than in 2006? Damn right they are. Is it going to save them in the next war? I doubt it.

    This is because combat does not take place on paper, it involves tons of different variables and the end result can often be counter intuitive.

    So you think for the past 12 years Hizbullah has been sitting home drawing combat pictures? Or, do you think the War in Syria wasn’t a real war? Everyone agrees that Hizbullah is now a battle hardened, combat experienced war machine. That is why in spite of all the rhetoric, Israel has not dared to make any move against Hizbullah.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    Everyone agrees that Hizbullah is now a battle hardened, combat experienced war machine.
     
    Mostly everyone. The same everyone who agrees on anything without much expertise and thinking.

    The minority who doesn't agree have a slightly different take:
    Hizbullah is now an increasingly battle weary armed group. They spend resources, including time, take casualties and gain experience not really beneficial to a future fight with the main enemy.
    They even think that Hezbollah engagement in Syria benefits Israel.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Another German Reader
    Reading about all those Middle-Eastern/North-African/Sub-Saharan African Youth Bulge Wars (TM) is so tiresome.

    Unz.com should not become a propaganda-channel for any of those factions/groups.

    Let them slaughter each-other and then make deals with the winners.

    The West/Far East/America has got the capital/tech/consumer-goods, these war-winners have to cut a deal with us anyway.

    Just keep their Young Angry Men away. They are troublesome.

    Cheers

    Let them slaughter each-other and then make deals with the winners.

    It is the Americans and the Europeans, including Germans, that are doing the slaughtering. Keep your young killers at home and there will not be any problem in the Middle East. The West is expert in making deals with “winners.” At this rate there will not be any winner left for the West to make deals.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    We apparently have an expert here.
    WELCOME!

    Could you please provide an example of a similar building being brought down as WTC7?

    Here are parameters for you:
    The size as WTC7.
    Built by material similar to WTC7.
    Material inside similar to WTC7.
    Put on fire by similar method available. No structural damage incurred while being put on fire, though (we don't want 5 tons bomb as a fire making device).
    And..after a similar time passed collapsed onto itself.

    Just.........one. Ever.

    Waiting........sort of. Not really but you can always surprise us here. Say, 5 % chance for that.

    Yep. WTC 1 and WTC 2. Study the 1960s changes in regs under whuch they were built.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    That's an interested point.

    Questions:
    Those three are the only buildings built by those standards? Anywhere? I presume not but you could supply the answer (how many, when and which) fast.
    If any of those remaining buildings get on fire, then, we can expect they'll also collapse, the same way?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ANON
    "similar buildings"???? That is not a professional engineer writing with knowledge of the legal regulations applicable, the compliance with them or non-compliance, and the actual designs and construction methods, is it?

    So why make such confident assertions on at best third hand amateur hearsay?

    We apparently have an expert here.
    WELCOME!

    Could you please provide an example of a similar building being brought down as WTC7?

    Here are parameters for you:
    The size as WTC7.
    Built by material similar to WTC7.
    Material inside similar to WTC7.
    Put on fire by similar method available. No structural damage incurred while being put on fire, though (we don’t want 5 tons bomb as a fire making device).
    And..after a similar time passed collapsed onto itself.

    Just………one. Ever.

    Waiting……..sort of. Not really but you can always surprise us here. Say, 5 % chance for that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ANON
    Yep. WTC 1 and WTC 2. Study the 1960s changes in regs under whuch they were built.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wizard of Oz
    Think about it - as few of UR's conspiracy mongers do - what happens before and when a "government" aims to give the public a version of things which may or may not be true or even contain deliberate lies. People high up who know little of the detail appoint or instruct or request others to find out things for them and report. Maybe there is someone who can with huge energy but no guarantee of success act through, say, the Director of Research or Chief Counsel to e.g. make sure someone isn't mentioned in a report or someone is focused on. Maybe though documents (and that can cover just about everything from field reports to scientific evidence) just go missing by misfiling or failure to recognise their significance. Do you think we would not have heard if there had been riding instructions to any of the major inquiring commissions that people (outsiders) suspect? Think of how most self respecting people would bristle at the idea thay tbey were being told to lie whether by President or, for Crissake, the V-P! Then you've got hired researchers and expert witnesses and consultants down the line who talk to each other.

    The most you are going to get is agreement on respectable aims like "we must be careful not to disclose anything which will imperil national security - but pf course without covering up major malfeasance"; "we don't need to dot every i and cross every t if it would unduly delay the report, as long as it doesn't fundamentally distort the truth or undermine public faith in our report".

    There are obviously cases where the government has already committed itself and its credit to a version of the truth which is not a lie but is not adequately backed with evidence and may be substantially untrue. That is where things are likely to get murky but the idea that getting people you appoint to follow through reliably for you is even likely is contrary to human fallibility.

    Can’t argue that.
    Could you argue that the public was deliberately lied to re Iraqi WMDs?

    That, sometimes, “the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy”.

    Now, in this particular example, “WTC 7″, things are, IMHO, not as clear cut as we are led to believe by MSM.

    So, true, I can be called anything anyone here wants. Fine with me. In fact, if my opinion wasn’t pissing at least somebody around I’d feel something was missing.

    So…in this case something isn’t quite right.

    As I said….I can not find ONE example of similar case.

    And,well, maybe I don’t know much about making buildings. But, I am absolutely positive that I do know more about destroying them than 90 % of posters here. Probably even 95. Anyone here completed just a basic demolition course, for example? Let alone knowing something about effects of weaponry on modern buildings etc. I mean, that’s the part of another course I spout I completed, MOUT/FIBUA related. Or, “how to bring that building down”.

    So, to keep this funny, I’d really like to know that combination of …things…that brought that building down.
    Say, the mission is to destroy a strongpoint to advance further into the city. The strongpoint is a building as WTC7 manned by a company of enemy. Too costly to assault, let’s reduce it. HOW?
    Well, the usual is: from decent bombing from air, through very decent direct artillery fire (at least 150 mm), to sending a combat assault engineers in. Not bad if you weren’t one of them.
    Option “WTC7″: suppress the building and send a helicopter gunship with a…canister….with those ingredients that brought down the “original”. Drop and watch.
    That’s for the First World military.

    For some…ahm…other “militaries” of this world that knowledge would be invaluable re race/religion/ethnicity warfare. Say, destroy the town…… Using “WTC7″ method is simple, cheap and fast.

    Read More
    • Replies: @DESERT FOX
    The WTC towers and other buildings ie WTC buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 were destroyed by a particle beam weapon, see Dr. Judy Wood.com.

    The ones behind the attack on 911 were Israel and the Zionist controlled deep state.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @A C
    I am Lebanese. I have seen what these people do up close and personal. I am not Jewish nor have I ever seen the inside of Israel or Palestine. I don't care to see them as I have no fondness at all for the area.

    What I do care about is the sanitizing of a militia that commits murder every time their leash is pulled by their masters. I care about the fact that this writer has written the most bias piece of garbage on this topic I have ever read.

    Do you speak Arabic fluently? I do. I see all of Nasrallah's speeches. all of them. in his native language. Believe me, this sanitizing is not a good thing.

    Ohhhhh, I see… you’re “Lebanese.” And therefore, you speak for all “Lebanese.” Your English is really good, almost like you’re not “Lebanese” at all. But no one lies on the internet.

    I think A C stands for Ameri Can. Clever.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra
    El Quaida, a USA propaganda invention.
    Why do you think the USA murdered a man over sixty who had been living in Abottabad quietly for many years ?
    I suppose the same reason the presumed Hess was suicided in the Spandau prison in Berlin, at all costs it had to be prevented that they spoke.

    Are you losing self control in your old age? It is really dopey to diaregard Al Qaeda’s attacks on the Kenyan and Tanzanian embassies, the USS warship off Yemen etc. And of course you say Osama bin Laden could speak of things which would show…. what? Oh that he was indeed an enemy of America!

    How, pray, was he prevented from saying something important? Do you think he was just gearing up for a big TV documentary that for some reason had to be forestalled?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS

    The WTC 7 collapse took all day. No surprise if you just asdume that the collapses were a product of mass above the heat weakened steel and the weakening of the steel.
     
    Can't say it's implausible.

    Still, my point remains: not ONCE in a rich history of urban warfare and destruction we've seen the same outcome.
    Not..........once......
    In fact, there have been documented cases of similar buildings, fires etc...and ..no collapse. Not....once.

    Makes this case rather unique.
    Could make people a bit curious, even suspicious.

    As for US Government telling the truth to the public.. let alone that one, actually any Government, let's just stop there.

    “similar buildings”???? That is not a professional engineer writing with knowledge of the legal regulations applicable, the compliance with them or non-compliance, and the actual designs and construction methods, is it?

    So why make such confident assertions on at best third hand amateur hearsay?

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    We apparently have an expert here.
    WELCOME!

    Could you please provide an example of a similar building being brought down as WTC7?

    Here are parameters for you:
    The size as WTC7.
    Built by material similar to WTC7.
    Material inside similar to WTC7.
    Put on fire by similar method available. No structural damage incurred while being put on fire, though (we don't want 5 tons bomb as a fire making device).
    And..after a similar time passed collapsed onto itself.

    Just.........one. Ever.

    Waiting........sort of. Not really but you can always surprise us here. Say, 5 % chance for that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS

    The WTC 7 collapse took all day. No surprise if you just asdume that the collapses were a product of mass above the heat weakened steel and the weakening of the steel.
     
    Can't say it's implausible.

    Still, my point remains: not ONCE in a rich history of urban warfare and destruction we've seen the same outcome.
    Not..........once......
    In fact, there have been documented cases of similar buildings, fires etc...and ..no collapse. Not....once.

    Makes this case rather unique.
    Could make people a bit curious, even suspicious.

    As for US Government telling the truth to the public.. let alone that one, actually any Government, let's just stop there.

    Think about it – as few of UR’s conspiracy mongers do – what happens before and when a “government” aims to give the public a version of things which may or may not be true or even contain deliberate lies. People high up who know little of the detail appoint or instruct or request others to find out things for them and report. Maybe there is someone who can with huge energy but no guarantee of success act through, say, the Director of Research or Chief Counsel to e.g. make sure someone isn’t mentioned in a report or someone is focused on. Maybe though documents (and that can cover just about everything from field reports to scientific evidence) just go missing by misfiling or failure to recognise their significance. Do you think we would not have heard if there had been riding instructions to any of the major inquiring commissions that people (outsiders) suspect? Think of how most self respecting people would bristle at the idea thay tbey were being told to lie whether by President or, for Crissake, the V-P! Then you’ve got hired researchers and expert witnesses and consultants down the line who talk to each other.

    The most you are going to get is agreement on respectable aims like “we must be careful not to disclose anything which will imperil national security – but pf course without covering up major malfeasance”; “we don’t need to dot every i and cross every t if it would unduly delay the report, as long as it doesn’t fundamentally distort the truth or undermine public faith in our report”.

    There are obviously cases where the government has already committed itself and its credit to a version of the truth which is not a lie but is not adequately backed with evidence and may be substantially untrue. That is where things are likely to get murky but the idea that getting people you appoint to follow through reliably for you is even likely is contrary to human fallibility.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    Can't argue that.
    Could you argue that the public was deliberately lied to re Iraqi WMDs?

    That, sometimes, "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy".

    Now, in this particular example, "WTC 7", things are, IMHO, not as clear cut as we are led to believe by MSM.

    So, true, I can be called anything anyone here wants. Fine with me. In fact, if my opinion wasn't pissing at least somebody around I'd feel something was missing.

    So...in this case something isn't quite right.

    As I said....I can not find ONE example of similar case.

    And,well, maybe I don't know much about making buildings. But, I am absolutely positive that I do know more about destroying them than 90 % of posters here. Probably even 95. Anyone here completed just a basic demolition course, for example? Let alone knowing something about effects of weaponry on modern buildings etc. I mean, that's the part of another course I spout I completed, MOUT/FIBUA related. Or, "how to bring that building down".

    So, to keep this funny, I'd really like to know that combination of ...things...that brought that building down.
    Say, the mission is to destroy a strongpoint to advance further into the city. The strongpoint is a building as WTC7 manned by a company of enemy. Too costly to assault, let's reduce it. HOW?
    Well, the usual is: from decent bombing from air, through very decent direct artillery fire (at least 150 mm), to sending a combat assault engineers in. Not bad if you weren't one of them.
    Option "WTC7": suppress the building and send a helicopter gunship with a...canister....with those ingredients that brought down the "original". Drop and watch.
    That's for the First World military.

    For some...ahm...other "militaries" of this world that knowledge would be invaluable re race/religion/ethnicity warfare. Say, destroy the town...... Using "WTC7" method is simple, cheap and fast.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @L.K
    "As a deluded Zionist psychopath" and coward, since you obviously do not even live in "Israel", would have been more accurate than " as a Jew ".

    One wonders if you are really deranged enough to believe in the ridiculous propaganda you spout...

    The zionist military, iof, was defeated and kicked out of Lebanon in a long protracted war.

    Went back at it in 06, facing a much stronger Hezbollah, lost the war in a month.
    Not even with a Hezbollah expeditionary force preoccupied with Syria since 2013 - less so now - did the cowardly iof dare attack Lebanon again.
    Hezbollah is much larger and stronger now than in 2006.
    Former MI6 spook and EU diplomat, Alastair Crooke, who wrote about the 2006 war, had some things to say re the possibility of Israel attacking Lebanon again... at 9:19, he says:
    "Israel depends entirely on air superiority... the israeli army after defeat in 2006 war made the decision that they could not put boots on the ground in Lebanon for more than 6 days.."
    Syria’s shifting sands: RT's Peter Lavelle interviews Alastair Crooke
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuTlEHiYLAU

    Hezbollah is much larger and stronger now than in 2006.

    Do you like boxing? Do you remember a fighter from the 80′s named Marvin Hagler?

    In 1981, Hagler defended his middleweight title against Syrian contender Mustafa Hamsho. Hamsho was a big strong middleweight, possibly the physically strongest middleweight ever. He was tough and he was determined to win, but Hagler proved to be just too skilled and Hagler brutally won the fight by TKO in round 11.

    3 years later Hagler was clearly starting to slide, but Hamsho had noticeably improved. He was showing head movement in his fights and not taking nearly as much punishment. He was a better fighter and in the 3 years since his loss to Hagler, he had won big fights that earned him another shot at the title.

    The result? Hamsho got knocked out in the 3rd round. So even though he was better and Hagler was worse, Hagler scored an even bigger victory. This is because combat does not take place on paper, it involves tons of different variables and the end result can often be counter intuitive.

    Do you see where I’m going with this?

    Is Hezbollah stronger today than in 2006? Damn right they are. Is it going to save them in the next war? I doubt it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MEexpert

    This is because combat does not take place on paper, it involves tons of different variables and the end result can often be counter intuitive.
     
    So you think for the past 12 years Hizbullah has been sitting home drawing combat pictures? Or, do you think the War in Syria wasn't a real war? Everyone agrees that Hizbullah is now a battle hardened, combat experienced war machine. That is why in spite of all the rhetoric, Israel has not dared to make any move against Hizbullah.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • To illustrate with visuals what Avnery is saying…
    An army that regularly engages in this type of stuff( and much worse);

    Does not do well when facing these dudes;

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Brett Redmayne-Titley
    The main question your comment begs is... why? Lebanon has never unilaterally attacked Israel, so why would you want Israel to attack Lebanon-AGAIN?

    Sadly, or perhaps thankfully, your comment shows the militaristic mindset that allowed Israel to slaughter 18 unarmed Palestinians last Friday and seven more today. Your comment, in supporting this type of atrocity strongly illustrates why the world is also rising up against Israel and the BDS movement getting stronger with each new atrocity.

    Even more interesting is that you would have you comment speak for all Jews, but this is as phoney a ascertion since multiple surveys of worldwide Jewry show that the majority does NOT support the Israeli foreign policy. The policy you are supporting in your comment is that of ZIONISM. Unfortunately, you apparently don't know the difference.

    Fortunately, the world, that includes world jewry, does know the difference. It also understands humanity and the lack thereof...........

    The main question your comment begs is… why? Lebanon has never unilaterally attacked Israel

    WHAAAAT????!?!?!?!!?!

    I mean, holy shit.

    L.K: If you have different things to say, either use multiple posts or do something like this:

    To separate your ideas. Stop putting separate trains of thought in the same body of text. It is really annoying and makes it impossible for me to understand what you are trying to say.

    “As a deluded Zionist psychopath” and coward, since you obviously do not even live in “Israel”, would have been more accurate than ” as a Jew “.

    From you’re point of view, they are one in the same. In Israel nobody would consider me a “Zionist”. Only on Unz am I a Zionist. Learn something about Israel before you talk about it.

    One wonders if you are really deranged enough to believe in the ridiculous propaganda you spout…

    You know what is so sad about this? I don’t even dislike you. Over the years I’ve developed a kind of grudging admiration for you (which isn’t to say that I like you, I don’t).

    But I’m the one who’s deluded? I’m the one spouting propaganda? Do you even listen to yourself?

    If you want to talk about the next war, I’m here. But you got to give me more then just “Hezbollah will crush the Zionist Occupation Army!”. I need something more specific to respond to.

    “Israel depends entirely on air superiority… the israeli army after defeat in 2006 war made the decision that they could not put boots on the ground in Lebanon for more than 6 days..”

    I see what he is trying to say but he overstates his case.

    Israel is not a Western country, but it is a Western military. Western military thinking since at least the end of WW2 has put an absolute premium on complete dominance of the air. Russia, China, Turkey, Iran and the Arab armies, however, consider the ground forces the most important arm and the air force as being in service to to the ground forces. In short: Western armies want to win the air whereas non Western armies want to defend it. Different philosophies.

    The Israeli ground forces fought phenomenally well after the first several days in 1973 despite not having air superiority and they also fought terribly in 2006 when they had absolute air supremacy. So no, the IDF does not depend on air superiority, it just highly values it as their most effective force multiplier.

    But why are you even bringing this up? What does air superiority have to do with the next war? Is Hezbollah about to start building their own F-16′s to fight for Lebanese air space? Hezbollah doesn’t give a crap about controlling the skies. The IDF can have them as far as Hezbollah is concerned.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Former Zionist terrorist & IOF veteran, Uri Avnery, wrote in despair:

    IT IS no longer anything new to point out that the occupation is destroying the Israeli army.

    An army cannot fulfill its mission to defend the state against potential enemies when it has been engaged for decades as a colonial police force. One can give attractive names to a death-squad – Team Mango or Unit Peach – but it remains what it is: an instrument of brutal killing and oppression.

    An officer who today plans the Mafia-style killing of a “senior militant” by an undercover action in the Kasbah of Nablus, will not be able tomorrow to lead a tank battalion against a sophisticated enemy. An army that shoots stone-throwers, chases children in the alleys of Balata refugee camp or drops a one-ton bomb on a residential building cannot turn overnight into an efficient force on a modern battlefield in a war of last resort.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • US Lieutenant Colonel Scott C. Farquhar, cautiously suggested that the IOF had improved after its defeat in 06 at the hands of Hezbollah, but the yardstick used to measure it was a poorly trained, equipped and led Hamas, in 2009.
    Concerning the IOF last major attack on Gaza in 2014, against an improved version of Hamas, how did the iof do? Former Zionist terrorist & IOF veteran, Uri Avnery, wrote:
    AFTER 29 DAYS of fighting (until now), who has won?

    It is, of course, much too early to draw final conclusions. The ceasefire has blown up. It will take months and years to sum up all the consequences. But Israeli popular wisdom has already drawn its own conclusions: it is a draw.[...]
    WHEN A guerrilla organization with at most 10,000 fighters achieves a draw with one of the mightiest armies in the world, equipped with the most ultra-modern weapons, that is by itself a kind of victory.
    Hamas has not only shown a lot of courage during the fighting, but also surprising ingenuity in preparing for this campaign. It is still standing upright.

    The Israeli army, on the other hand, has shown very little imagination. It was quite unprepared for the maze of tunnels.
    … Indeed, as a commentator dared to write, the army has become a heavy, cumbersome, conservative machine. It followed its established routine…Its doctrine was, in essence, to pound the civilian population into submission, causing as much killing and destruction as possible, so as to deter the “resistance” as much and as long as possible. In Israel, the terrible pictures of death and destruction did not evoke compassion. On the contrary. People were proud of it
    .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anon[295] • Disclaimer says:
    @A C
    Well, this Lebanese definitely disagrees with you. Hizbullah is garbage, they are murderers and thugs. Nothing they do is for the good of Lebanon. It is all for the good of their masters in Iran.

    A phone call Wednesday between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump grew tense over Israeli objections to US plans to leave Syria, US administration officials said Wednesday, adding that Trump wants to pull out all troops within six months to the dismay of the country’s main security agencies and allies.

    It said that “President Trump reiterated the commitment of the United States to Israel’s security,” and added that “the two leaders agreed to continue their close coordination on countering Iran’s malign influence and destabilizing activities.”

    But two US officials told The Associated Press on Wednesday the talks grew tense because of Israeli concerns that the United States will withdraw from Syria in the near future and allow its enemies  — primarily Iran — to gain a further foothold in a neighboring country through its various —https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-officials-trump-netanyahu-call-grew-tense-over-plans-to-leave-syria/

    Sure , you will find a Syrian who will agree with Netanhowyuooooooooo

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @A C
    Thanks for assuming I am too stupid to form an opinion outside of what a talking head tells me. I am lebanese. I have lived in Lebanon, I have seen up close and personal what Hizbullah does and what they are capable of.

    Have you?

    It is indeed possible that you could be a Lebanese…

    There are plenty of traitors on the Saudi payroll and Israeli collaborators in Lebanon. You are butt hurt cause your machinations with the enemies of Lebanon have all failed.

    But you are mistaken; you are the ones who are garbage, pure scum. No man of conscience from anywhere in the world respects your kind.

    Hezbollah are too nice to let you breathe, you should be thankful.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In the study “Back to Basics”, US Lieutenant Colonel Scott C. Farquhar, wrote:

    American professional military personnel are well-acquainted with “the arrogant show of strength” that was Task Force Smith in Korea in the summer of 1950 and of its fate. A similar result occurred when the vaunted IDF attacked into Lebanon in 2006 against the guerrilla army of Hezbollah: a firstworld army was fought to a standstill by a tough and determined enemy despite overwhelming air power. The IDF pitted ill-trained soldiers and ill-educated officers, who attempted to carry out vague orders and unfamiliar tasks, against a small group of men with good weapons and a simple mission.

    He examines the IOF supposed improvements after the 2006 defeat and its better performance against the Palestinians trapped in Gaza during operation Cast Lead, in late December 2008-January 2009, but cautions that Hamas was much weaker than Hezbollah:

    Hezbollah presented the Israelis with a well trained, well led and suitably equipped force with sufficient space to defend in depth. Hamas was inadequately trained and poorly led with little space to trade for producing Israeli casualties…. Conversely, as in the case of Hamas, an underequipped, ill trained and poorly commanded opponent can be an annoyance—but it will not stand long against significant national power. Hamas presented the Israelis with a poor imitation of Hezbollah

    Read More
    • Replies: @MEexpert
    The difference between the mighty Israeli army and the little Hizbullah army is that of leadership. The fat cat generals of Israeli army can hardly move with all those heavy medals, won during all the wars against unarmed Palestinians, pinned on their chests while, the Hizbullah army is led by a black turbaned and black-robed simple soldier with only the medal of his faith pinned in his heart.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anon[295] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon
    Can't address all the sopohtry presented as reasons here as analytical exercises but this quote will take care of no-4 and the rest will topple over each other



    "The invasion of Iraq had been promoted in part as a way to bring democracy to the region and help Israel. Now she argued that because the turmoil in Iraq had led to the rise of Iran, the collective fear of the Sunni world would make Arabs more willing to strike a deal with Israel….

    The Confidante: Condoleezza Rice and the Creation of the Bush Legacy

    Glenn Kessler (Author)

    Now to help you a bit further , go back to 1900 when the powers were courted by Zionist for a country in Palestine in exchange of protecting existing interests or creating new opportunities .

    USA has allowed itself to be stretched logically conceptually and ideologically from one spot to the next from 1965 by Israel openly and collaboratelly . Many examples . One is this simple - America is going to liberate Kuwait ( not liberating Palestine or Golan ) and from there more demands and conditions followed until US ran out of conditions and demands ( unless suicidal capituutaltion of Saddam was included ).
    The ideological talking points underlying these demands have come from AIPAC and like minded incestous bodies.

    ” and would make Arabs more willing to strike a deal”

    Wow!!!!!!!!!

    The events both before and after that 911 type only billion times worse attack on Iraq prove Israel never was interested in deals . It wants what it wants at any given point of time and space. Both are ready for next metamorphosis after one set of demand is met for next set of demand .

    Waiting for the day when the Zionist would say :” well they still don’t recognize the Torah ( Chuck Shuer recently told exactly that – that there is no peace because Palestinian don’t believe inTorah) , the Goym don’t recognize us as the Chosen one ” as the reasons for extending ongoing fights around the neighbpirhoods using US power and for stifling the last breath way from the Gazan and West Bank inhabitants .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Greasy William

    As a Lebanese, my only comment is that the writer of the article has described the feeling and general mood in Lebanon very accurate.
     
    And as a Jew, I just want to say: we're coming for you.

    You say the mood in the country is good. Let's see how good it is after the next war when we have destroyed every power and water plant in your country and ethnically cleansed the southern portion of it. And you won't have the Saudis to pay for reconstruction this time.

    Get used to living like a Gazan.

    The main question your comment begs is… why? Lebanon has never unilaterally attacked Israel, so why would you want Israel to attack Lebanon-AGAIN?

    Sadly, or perhaps thankfully, your comment shows the militaristic mindset that allowed Israel to slaughter 18 unarmed Palestinians last Friday and seven more today. Your comment, in supporting this type of atrocity strongly illustrates why the world is also rising up against Israel and the BDS movement getting stronger with each new atrocity.

    Even more interesting is that you would have you comment speak for all Jews, but this is as phoney a ascertion since multiple surveys of worldwide Jewry show that the majority does NOT support the Israeli foreign policy. The policy you are supporting in your comment is that of ZIONISM. Unfortunately, you apparently don’t know the difference.

    Fortunately, the world, that includes world jewry, does know the difference. It also understands humanity and the lack thereof………..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Greasy William

    The main question your comment begs is… why? Lebanon has never unilaterally attacked Israel
     
    WHAAAAT????!?!?!?!!?!

    I mean, holy shit.

    ...

    L.K: If you have different things to say, either use multiple posts or do something like this:

    ...

    To separate your ideas. Stop putting separate trains of thought in the same body of text. It is really annoying and makes it impossible for me to understand what you are trying to say.

    ...

    “As a deluded Zionist psychopath” and coward, since you obviously do not even live in “Israel”, would have been more accurate than ” as a Jew “.
     
    From you're point of view, they are one in the same. In Israel nobody would consider me a "Zionist". Only on Unz am I a Zionist. Learn something about Israel before you talk about it.

    One wonders if you are really deranged enough to believe in the ridiculous propaganda you spout…
     
    You know what is so sad about this? I don't even dislike you. Over the years I've developed a kind of grudging admiration for you (which isn't to say that I like you, I don't).

    But I'm the one who's deluded? I'm the one spouting propaganda? Do you even listen to yourself?

    If you want to talk about the next war, I'm here. But you got to give me more then just "Hezbollah will crush the Zionist Occupation Army!". I need something more specific to respond to.

    “Israel depends entirely on air superiority… the israeli army after defeat in 2006 war made the decision that they could not put boots on the ground in Lebanon for more than 6 days..”
     
    I see what he is trying to say but he overstates his case.

    Israel is not a Western country, but it is a Western military. Western military thinking since at least the end of WW2 has put an absolute premium on complete dominance of the air. Russia, China, Turkey, Iran and the Arab armies, however, consider the ground forces the most important arm and the air force as being in service to to the ground forces. In short: Western armies want to win the air whereas non Western armies want to defend it. Different philosophies.

    The Israeli ground forces fought phenomenally well after the first several days in 1973 despite not having air superiority and they also fought terribly in 2006 when they had absolute air supremacy. So no, the IDF does not depend on air superiority, it just highly values it as their most effective force multiplier.

    But why are you even bringing this up? What does air superiority have to do with the next war? Is Hezbollah about to start building their own F-16's to fight for Lebanese air space? Hezbollah doesn't give a crap about controlling the skies. The IDF can have them as far as Hezbollah is concerned.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Greasy William

    As a Lebanese, my only comment is that the writer of the article has described the feeling and general mood in Lebanon very accurate.
     
    And as a Jew, I just want to say: we're coming for you.

    You say the mood in the country is good. Let's see how good it is after the next war when we have destroyed every power and water plant in your country and ethnically cleansed the southern portion of it. And you won't have the Saudis to pay for reconstruction this time.

    Get used to living like a Gazan.

    “As a deluded Zionist psychopath” and coward, since you obviously do not even live in “Israel”, would have been more accurate than ” as a Jew “.

    One wonders if you are really deranged enough to believe in the ridiculous propaganda you spout…

    The zionist military, iof, was defeated and kicked out of Lebanon in a long protracted war.

    Went back at it in 06, facing a much stronger Hezbollah, lost the war in a month.
    Not even with a Hezbollah expeditionary force preoccupied with Syria since 2013 – less so now – did the cowardly iof dare attack Lebanon again.
    Hezbollah is much larger and stronger now than in 2006.
    Former MI6 spook and EU diplomat, Alastair Crooke, who wrote about the 2006 war, had some things to say re the possibility of Israel attacking Lebanon again… at 9:19, he says:
    “Israel depends entirely on air superiority… the israeli army after defeat in 2006 war made the decision that they could not put boots on the ground in Lebanon for more than 6 days..”
    Syria’s shifting sands: RT’s Peter Lavelle interviews Alastair Crooke

    Read More
    • Replies: @Greasy William

    Hezbollah is much larger and stronger now than in 2006.
     
    Do you like boxing? Do you remember a fighter from the 80's named Marvin Hagler?

    In 1981, Hagler defended his middleweight title against Syrian contender Mustafa Hamsho. Hamsho was a big strong middleweight, possibly the physically strongest middleweight ever. He was tough and he was determined to win, but Hagler proved to be just too skilled and Hagler brutally won the fight by TKO in round 11.

    3 years later Hagler was clearly starting to slide, but Hamsho had noticeably improved. He was showing head movement in his fights and not taking nearly as much punishment. He was a better fighter and in the 3 years since his loss to Hagler, he had won big fights that earned him another shot at the title.

    The result? Hamsho got knocked out in the 3rd round. So even though he was better and Hagler was worse, Hagler scored an even bigger victory. This is because combat does not take place on paper, it involves tons of different variables and the end result can often be counter intuitive.

    Do you see where I'm going with this?

    Is Hezbollah stronger today than in 2006? Damn right they are. Is it going to save them in the next war? I doubt it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A C says:
    @Art
    This is the biggest load of trash article I have EVER read on the Middle East and considering both right and left wing garbage that is out there, that is saying something.

    A C,

    Oh my -- This is the biggest hasbara troll comment I have EVER read on the Middle East.

    Nasrallah is good man who looks out for his people.

    Shame on the Jews for not supporting him.

    The world knows that Netanyahu and the Israelis are the true terrorists and assassins.

    Think Peace --- Do No Harm --- Art

    I am Lebanese. I have seen what these people do up close and personal. I am not Jewish nor have I ever seen the inside of Israel or Palestine. I don’t care to see them as I have no fondness at all for the area.

    What I do care about is the sanitizing of a militia that commits murder every time their leash is pulled by their masters. I care about the fact that this writer has written the most bias piece of garbage on this topic I have ever read.

    Do you speak Arabic fluently? I do. I see all of Nasrallah’s speeches. all of them. in his native language. Believe me, this sanitizing is not a good thing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @poop
    Ohhhhh, I see... you're "Lebanese." And therefore, you speak for all "Lebanese." Your English is really good, almost like you're not "Lebanese" at all. But no one lies on the internet.

    I think A C stands for Ameri Can. Clever.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twodees Partain
    The way it works is that you have to know a thing or two that didn't come from a TV talking head's mouth before you can form an opinion. As it stands, you don't have an opinion.

    Thanks for assuming I am too stupid to form an opinion outside of what a talking head tells me. I am lebanese. I have lived in Lebanon, I have seen up close and personal what Hizbullah does and what they are capable of.

    Have you?

    Read More
    • Replies: @L.K
    It is indeed possible that you could be a Lebanese...

    There are plenty of traitors on the Saudi payroll and Israeli collaborators in Lebanon. You are butt hurt cause your machinations with the enemies of Lebanon have all failed.

    But you are mistaken; you are the ones who are garbage, pure scum. No man of conscience from anywhere in the world respects your kind.

    Hezbollah are too nice to let you breathe, you should be thankful.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    As a Lebanese, my only comment is that the writer of the article has described the feeling and general mood in Lebanon very accurate. It is obvious that he was actually in Lebanon meeting real people of the country. I am not saying that everybody thinks same,everyone has its own opinion,but general mood,yes,very good. Of course, nobody wants war,but if Israel attacks again, what choice do we have but to fight back. And,thank God,there are guys that know how to do it. And yes,although everything about Resistance in the west is pretty much controversial,especially if you start to tell good stories about it,but their everyday behaviour,as well everything they do, deserves only respect

    Well, this Lebanese definitely disagrees with you. Hizbullah is garbage, they are murderers and thugs. Nothing they do is for the good of Lebanon. It is all for the good of their masters in Iran.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    A phone call Wednesday between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump grew tense over Israeli objections to US plans to leave Syria, US administration officials said Wednesday, adding that Trump wants to pull out all troops within six months to the dismay of the country’s main security agencies and allies.

    It said that “President Trump reiterated the commitment of the United States to Israel’s security,” and added that “the two leaders agreed to continue their close coordination on countering Iran’s malign influence and destabilizing activities.”

    But two US officials told The Associated Press on Wednesday the talks grew tense because of Israeli concerns that the United States will withdraw from Syria in the near future and allow its enemies  — primarily Iran — to gain a further foothold in a neighboring country through its various ---https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-officials-trump-netanyahu-call-grew-tense-over-plans-to-leave-syria/



    Sure , you will find a Syrian who will agree with Netanhowyuooooooooo
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Christian Singer Honors Hezbollah in Stunning 2013 Concert, Lebanon

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anon[295] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mike-SMO
    A few points jump out of this "conversation" to a non-Israel, non-neo-con, non-Russian observer:

    1) The interview mentions prisoner exchange with Israel suggesting that there was an active program being conducted against Israel and that some of the agents/players/etc had been captured. Israel was then, in some sense, under attack and not exactly a simple aggressor, and the attacks into Lebanon might well have been "provoked".

    2) The pipeline (or some means of passage) seems reasonable since it seems clear that the Sunni Arab "core" was being "encircled" by Shia/Iranian activity from Yemen around to the Med. Why would a pipeline/railroad/air corridor have been so unreasonable to consider? Maybe nothing concrete was accomplished but such a "safe" transport route would seem to make sense to the Sunni Arabs in the face of potential envelopement by "unfriendly" interests.

    3) The cooperation between the Shia forces and others makes tactical sense especially in comparison to the intolerance typically reported for Sunni actors. It was, indeed, useful against ISIS/ISIL and their associates, and maybe an extention of the Alawi "tolerance" in Syria, but the heavy dominance of the Shia/Hizbullah faction does not suggest much of an effective future for other players, especially if future actions against Israel are part of the "plan".

    4) Israel is mentioned as a cause for the "troubles" but the conclict seems to actually be centered on Sunni/Shia and Turkish/Kurdish/Arab stresses, not to mention the Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas/Palestinian activities. Israel almost seems to be more of an "excuse" or post-facto justification for some other, long-running disputes.

    Can’t address all the sopohtry presented as reasons here as analytical exercises but this quote will take care of no-4 and the rest will topple over each other

    “The invasion of Iraq had been promoted in part as a way to bring democracy to the region and help Israel. Now she argued that because the turmoil in Iraq had led to the rise of Iran, the collective fear of the Sunni world would make Arabs more willing to strike a deal with Israel….

    The Confidante: Condoleezza Rice and the Creation of the Bush Legacy

    Glenn Kessler (Author)

    Now to help you a bit further , go back to 1900 when the powers were courted by Zionist for a country in Palestine in exchange of protecting existing interests or creating new opportunities .

    USA has allowed itself to be stretched logically conceptually and ideologically from one spot to the next from 1965 by Israel openly and collaboratelly . Many examples . One is this simple – America is going to liberate Kuwait ( not liberating Palestine or Golan ) and from there more demands and conditions followed until US ran out of conditions and demands ( unless suicidal capituutaltion of Saddam was included ).
    The ideological talking points underlying these demands have come from AIPAC and like minded incestous bodies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    " and would make Arabs more willing to strike a deal"

    Wow!!!!!!!!!

    The events both before and after that 911 type only billion times worse attack on Iraq prove Israel never was interested in deals . It wants what it wants at any given point of time and space. Both are ready for next metamorphosis after one set of demand is met for next set of demand .

    Waiting for the day when the Zionist would say :" well they still don't recognize the Torah ( Chuck Shuer recently told exactly that - that there is no peace because Palestinian don't believe inTorah) , the Goym don't recognize us as the Chosen one " as the reasons for extending ongoing fights around the neighbpirhoods using US power and for stifling the last breath way from the Gazan and West Bank inhabitants .
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS

    … mainly because the Soviets repeatedly vetoed the proposal.....
     
    Makes sense.
    At the same time we had Reagan and “Evil Empire” with the rest of it, so I don’t think Soviet veto was that important.

    That from the book, yes......

    Either way you cut it feels simply....excessive.

    Why so excessive is the question.

    I don’t know. I mean, you see how seriously everybody here still fights over WWII history – almost none of whom were even alive at the time, nevermind being involved or even there.

    There are present narratives that people are wedded to that require the maintenance or destruction of past myths and narratives.

    And there were other and related powerful narratives in 1987 when Hess finally offed himself at the age of 93.

    There is something about the Nazis and Stalin that apparently never gets old…but it’s still early, who knows.

    You are right, though. When I read that about the prison being kept open almost 20 years for Hess alone I was mildly disturbed. Excessive.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • And as a Jew, I just want to say: we’re coming for you.

    And an Israeli would probably say: who’s this “we” you talk about, yankee?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    As a Lebanese, my only comment is that the writer of the article has described the feeling and general mood in Lebanon very accurate. It is obvious that he was actually in Lebanon meeting real people of the country. I am not saying that everybody thinks same,everyone has its own opinion,but general mood,yes,very good. Of course, nobody wants war,but if Israel attacks again, what choice do we have but to fight back. And,thank God,there are guys that know how to do it. And yes,although everything about Resistance in the west is pretty much controversial,especially if you start to tell good stories about it,but their everyday behaviour,as well everything they do, deserves only respect

    As a Lebanese, my only comment is that the writer of the article has described the feeling and general mood in Lebanon very accurate.

    And as a Jew, I just want to say: we’re coming for you.

    You say the mood in the country is good. Let’s see how good it is after the next war when we have destroyed every power and water plant in your country and ethnically cleansed the southern portion of it. And you won’t have the Saudis to pay for reconstruction this time.

    Get used to living like a Gazan.

    Read More
    • LOL: L.K
    • Replies: @L.K
    "As a deluded Zionist psychopath" and coward, since you obviously do not even live in "Israel", would have been more accurate than " as a Jew ".

    One wonders if you are really deranged enough to believe in the ridiculous propaganda you spout...

    The zionist military, iof, was defeated and kicked out of Lebanon in a long protracted war.

    Went back at it in 06, facing a much stronger Hezbollah, lost the war in a month.
    Not even with a Hezbollah expeditionary force preoccupied with Syria since 2013 - less so now - did the cowardly iof dare attack Lebanon again.
    Hezbollah is much larger and stronger now than in 2006.
    Former MI6 spook and EU diplomat, Alastair Crooke, who wrote about the 2006 war, had some things to say re the possibility of Israel attacking Lebanon again... at 9:19, he says:
    "Israel depends entirely on air superiority... the israeli army after defeat in 2006 war made the decision that they could not put boots on the ground in Lebanon for more than 6 days.."
    Syria’s shifting sands: RT's Peter Lavelle interviews Alastair Crooke
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuTlEHiYLAU
    , @Brett Redmayne-Titley
    The main question your comment begs is... why? Lebanon has never unilaterally attacked Israel, so why would you want Israel to attack Lebanon-AGAIN?

    Sadly, or perhaps thankfully, your comment shows the militaristic mindset that allowed Israel to slaughter 18 unarmed Palestinians last Friday and seven more today. Your comment, in supporting this type of atrocity strongly illustrates why the world is also rising up against Israel and the BDS movement getting stronger with each new atrocity.

    Even more interesting is that you would have you comment speak for all Jews, but this is as phoney a ascertion since multiple surveys of worldwide Jewry show that the majority does NOT support the Israeli foreign policy. The policy you are supporting in your comment is that of ZIONISM. Unfortunately, you apparently don't know the difference.

    Fortunately, the world, that includes world jewry, does know the difference. It also understands humanity and the lack thereof...........
    , @MEexpert

    Let’s see how good it is after the next war when we have destroyed every power and water plant in your country and ethnically cleansed the southern portion of it.
     
    Then why haven't you? The brave little country didn't even have the courage to attack Lebanon while Hizbullah was busy wiping out ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Furthermore, Israel is only good for destroying infrastructure. The Israelis can't face the real army.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Johnny Rico
    https://kilodocuments.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/20180406_hess3.jpg

    https://kilodocuments.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/20180406_hess1.jpg

    https://kilodocuments.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/20180406_hess2.jpg

    … mainly because the Soviets repeatedly vetoed the proposal…..

    Makes sense.
    At the same time we had Reagan and “Evil Empire” with the rest of it, so I don’t think Soviet veto was that important.

    That from the book, yes……

    Either way you cut it feels simply….excessive.

    Why so excessive is the question.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johnny Rico
    I don't know. I mean, you see how seriously everybody here still fights over WWII history - almost none of whom were even alive at the time, nevermind being involved or even there.

    There are present narratives that people are wedded to that require the maintenance or destruction of past myths and narratives.

    And there were other and related powerful narratives in 1987 when Hess finally offed himself at the age of 93.

    There is something about the Nazis and Stalin that apparently never gets old...but it's still early, who knows.

    You are right, though. When I read that about the prison being kept open almost 20 years for Hess alone I was mildly disturbed. Excessive.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    … mainly because the Soviets repeatedly vetoed the proposal.....
     
    Makes sense.
    At the same time we had Reagan and “Evil Empire” with the rest of it, so I don’t think Soviet veto was that important.

    That from the book, yes......

    Either way you cut it feels simply....excessive.

    Why so excessive is the question.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon[389] • Disclaimer says:

    As a Lebanese, my only comment is that the writer of the article has described the feeling and general mood in Lebanon very accurate. It is obvious that he was actually in Lebanon meeting real people of the country. I am not saying that everybody thinks same,everyone has its own opinion,but general mood,yes,very good. Of course, nobody wants war,but if Israel attacks again, what choice do we have but to fight back. And,thank God,there are guys that know how to do it. And yes,although everything about Resistance in the west is pretty much controversial,especially if you start to tell good stories about it,but their everyday behaviour,as well everything they do, deserves only respect

    Read More
    • Replies: @Greasy William

    As a Lebanese, my only comment is that the writer of the article has described the feeling and general mood in Lebanon very accurate.
     
    And as a Jew, I just want to say: we're coming for you.

    You say the mood in the country is good. Let's see how good it is after the next war when we have destroyed every power and water plant in your country and ethnically cleansed the southern portion of it. And you won't have the Saudis to pay for reconstruction this time.

    Get used to living like a Gazan.
    , @A C
    Well, this Lebanese definitely disagrees with you. Hizbullah is garbage, they are murderers and thugs. Nothing they do is for the good of Lebanon. It is all for the good of their masters in Iran.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wizard of Oz
    All of the towers were built to new discretionary standards and specs which, crucially perhaps, allowed for a lot less concrete to be used. The idea that WTC 7 was demolished as part of a plot that was obviously intended to involve as little reason for suspicion as possible is ridiculous. It added and could have added nothing to the political outcome but added complexity and added likelihood of the conspiracy unravelling or being exposed. (The idea that there were some records there that someone wanted destroyed presupposes that it was guaranteed there were no copies elsewhere).

    In fact the burning all day from a small beginning in WTC 7 fits very well the explanation of the time it took for the North and South Towers to collapse after impact. Where the effect of heat weakened steel was enhanced by there being the weight of an extra 18 floors above the level of impact the building collapsed in a much shorter time. The WTC 7 collapse took all day. No surprise if you just asdume that the collapses were a product of mass above the heat weakened steel and the weakening of the steel.

    The WTC 7 collapse took all day. No surprise if you just asdume that the collapses were a product of mass above the heat weakened steel and the weakening of the steel.

    Can’t say it’s implausible.

    Still, my point remains: not ONCE in a rich history of urban warfare and destruction we’ve seen the same outcome.
    Not……….once……
    In fact, there have been documented cases of similar buildings, fires etc…and ..no collapse. Not….once.

    Makes this case rather unique.
    Could make people a bit curious, even suspicious.

    As for US Government telling the truth to the public.. let alone that one, actually any Government, let’s just stop there.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Think about it - as few of UR's conspiracy mongers do - what happens before and when a "government" aims to give the public a version of things which may or may not be true or even contain deliberate lies. People high up who know little of the detail appoint or instruct or request others to find out things for them and report. Maybe there is someone who can with huge energy but no guarantee of success act through, say, the Director of Research or Chief Counsel to e.g. make sure someone isn't mentioned in a report or someone is focused on. Maybe though documents (and that can cover just about everything from field reports to scientific evidence) just go missing by misfiling or failure to recognise their significance. Do you think we would not have heard if there had been riding instructions to any of the major inquiring commissions that people (outsiders) suspect? Think of how most self respecting people would bristle at the idea thay tbey were being told to lie whether by President or, for Crissake, the V-P! Then you've got hired researchers and expert witnesses and consultants down the line who talk to each other.

    The most you are going to get is agreement on respectable aims like "we must be careful not to disclose anything which will imperil national security - but pf course without covering up major malfeasance"; "we don't need to dot every i and cross every t if it would unduly delay the report, as long as it doesn't fundamentally distort the truth or undermine public faith in our report".

    There are obviously cases where the government has already committed itself and its credit to a version of the truth which is not a lie but is not adequately backed with evidence and may be substantially untrue. That is where things are likely to get murky but the idea that getting people you appoint to follow through reliably for you is even likely is contrary to human fallibility.
    , @ANON
    "similar buildings"???? That is not a professional engineer writing with knowledge of the legal regulations applicable, the compliance with them or non-compliance, and the actual designs and construction methods, is it?

    So why make such confident assertions on at best third hand amateur hearsay?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    Ah, you do know about the topic.

    So....a simple question then:
    Why keeping that man incarcerated so long?
    The cost, a lot of work....feels a bit over the top.
    Or not?

    Other than his stays in hospital, Hess spent the rest of his life in Spandau Prison.[123] His fellow inmates Konstantin von Neurath, Walther Funk and Erich Raeder were released because of poor health in the 1950s;[124] Karl Dönitz, Baldur von Schirach, and Albert Speer served their time and were released; Dönitz in 1956, Schirach and Speer in 1966.[125] The 600-cell prison continued to be maintained for its lone prisoner from Speer and Schirach’s release until Hess’s death in 1987, at an estimated cost of DM 800,000.[126] Conditions were far more pleasant in the 1980s than in the early years; Hess was allowed to move more freely around the cell block, setting his own routine and choosing his own activities, which included television, films, reading and gardening. A lift was installed so he could more readily access the garden, and he was provided with a medical orderly from 1982 onward.[118]

    Numerous appeals for Hess’s release were launched by his lawyer, Dr Alfred Seidl, beginning as early as 1947. These were denied, mainly because the Soviets repeatedly vetoed the proposal. Spandau was located in West Berlin, and its existence gave the Soviets a foothold in that sector of the city. Additionally, Soviet officials believed Hess must have known in 1941 that an attack on their country was imminent.[127] In 1967 Wolf Rüdiger Hess began a campaign to win his father’s release, garnering support from notable politicians such as Geoffrey Lawrence, 1st Baron Oaksey[a] in Britain and Willy Brandt in Germany, but to no avail, in spite of the prisoner’s advanced age and deteriorating health.[128][129]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Hess

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Reading about all those Middle-Eastern/North-African/Sub-Saharan African Youth Bulge Wars (TM) is so tiresome.

    Unz.com should not become a propaganda-channel for any of those factions/groups.

    Let them slaughter each-other and then make deals with the winners.

    The West/Far East/America has got the capital/tech/consumer-goods, these war-winners have to cut a deal with us anyway.

    Just keep their Young Angry Men away. They are troublesome.

    Cheers

    Read More
    • Replies: @MEexpert

    Let them slaughter each-other and then make deals with the winners.
     
    It is the Americans and the Europeans, including Germans, that are doing the slaughtering. Keep your young killers at home and there will not be any problem in the Middle East. The West is expert in making deals with "winners." At this rate there will not be any winner left for the West to make deals.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    If you are just now making up for 30 years of knowing nothing about the relevant history you can believe that there are embarrassments for the Royal Family still to be spilled that are not a yawn for those with some regular knowledge of the last 80 years of British history. There is also good evidence that Bormann had sidelined Hess, Hitler's nominal deputy, and that Hitler was furious at Hess's folly and the embarrassment it caused Hitler. So what that on some occasion he might have dropped a facesaving hint that it was all his brilliant idea for a Machiavellian purpose. Of course it was Hess that jumped into Great Britain and ended his days in his 90s in Spandau. I hope you haven't paid for a shyster's BS.

    Ah, you do know about the topic.

    So….a simple question then:
    Why keeping that man incarcerated so long?
    The cost, a lot of work….feels a bit over the top.
    Or not?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johnny Rico

    Other than his stays in hospital, Hess spent the rest of his life in Spandau Prison.[123] His fellow inmates Konstantin von Neurath, Walther Funk and Erich Raeder were released because of poor health in the 1950s;[124] Karl Dönitz, Baldur von Schirach, and Albert Speer served their time and were released; Dönitz in 1956, Schirach and Speer in 1966.[125] The 600-cell prison continued to be maintained for its lone prisoner from Speer and Schirach's release until Hess's death in 1987, at an estimated cost of DM 800,000.[126] Conditions were far more pleasant in the 1980s than in the early years; Hess was allowed to move more freely around the cell block, setting his own routine and choosing his own activities, which included television, films, reading and gardening. A lift was installed so he could more readily access the garden, and he was provided with a medical orderly from 1982 onward.[118]

    Numerous appeals for Hess's release were launched by his lawyer, Dr Alfred Seidl, beginning as early as 1947. These were denied, mainly because the Soviets repeatedly vetoed the proposal. Spandau was located in West Berlin, and its existence gave the Soviets a foothold in that sector of the city. Additionally, Soviet officials believed Hess must have known in 1941 that an attack on their country was imminent.[127] In 1967 Wolf Rüdiger Hess began a campaign to win his father's release, garnering support from notable politicians such as Geoffrey Lawrence, 1st Baron Oaksey[a] in Britain and Willy Brandt in Germany, but to no avail, in spite of the prisoner's advanced age and deteriorating health.[128][129]
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Hess
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Greasy William
    That analysis doesn't even make the IDF look good. In fact it shows how weak the IDF really is. Even Nasrallah* would probably agree with most of it. But because it isn't pure Saker/Southfront propaganda it was apparently enough to blow a few gaskets here.

    I like to troll, but this is just depressing. It isn't healthy for people to walk around carrying so much delusion and hate; whether it be for Jews or anyone else.


    *Funny story about Nasrallah. According to Israeli intelligence he has a rare genetic disorder that makes him unable to lie. He is like a real life version of Jim Carey's character from "Liar Liar". For his part, Nasrallah claims that he can lie, he just generally chooses not to.

    But because it isn’t pure Saker/Southfront propaganda it was apparently enough to blow a few gaskets here.

    Of course.

    …this is just depressing

    Not really.
    People blow their gaskets over debating “vegan” vs “vegetarian”.

    Whatever people posting here like to believe about themselves they are the same as everywhere else on the Internet. This site is exactly as the rest of the Internet except for the fact that the owner and mods allow different and conflicting opinions. That’s the only …only…difference. I believe it’s the most important one.
    Hint: “ignore” button. Keeps the noise out and the air clean.

    For his part, Nasrallah claims that he can lie, he just generally chooses not to

    A person engaged in professional politics who does not lie. Now, that is funny.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @mcohen
    The transition from non state actor to legal basis of sovereignty is the difference between infantry and f 35 jets.
    Drugs,protection rackets,useful thugs may pay the way short term but real power will allude.
    The spread of cheap autonomous a.i driven military hardware will change this equation.imagine a miniature self drive car that is a car bomb
    And that will be the end of that said the cat.

    Monsieur Cohen, very true. The legal basis for sovereignty is a long way off. As you know, legal sovereignty is responsibility: that is, good-faith accession to the UN Charter, the International Bill of Human Rights, and the Rome Statute – at a minimum. Since Israel routinely uses force in manifest breach of the UN Charter, flouts all three instruments of the International Bill of Human Rights, and has failed to accede to the Rome Statute, Israel has forfeited its sovereignty in law. This triggers the obligations erga omnes of the Responsibility to Protect. Hopefully the world can stop Israel’s aggression, crimes against humanity, and genocide without recourse to R2P pillar 3.

    Hizbullah is clearly preparing to fill the void of Israel’s catastrophic failure to protect their indigenous Palestinian majority. It takes time and patient diplomacy to demonstrate responsibility to the UN member nations that will recognize the successor state of the criminal Israeli regime.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @peterAUS
    Three options:

    One:
    You read the book before. Doubt it, somehow. Very much so.

    Two:
    You read the book just now.
    Whooaaahh........

    What a fast reader. Man.........you are........amazing.
    Took me a couple of weeks to go through all that.
    Whoahh.......

    How do you do that?
    Or, wait...you don't. You do it even better. You establish some....mystical...connection with a book and, voila....all yours.
    You are simply.......amazing. Amazing.

    Unfortunately, doubt it too. If you had such ability you wouldn't be posting here. Mere mortals etc....

    Three:
    Let's leave that out of polite conversation here.

    I'd go for three.
    Keyword "easy".

    If you are just now making up for 30 years of knowing nothing about the relevant history you can believe that there are embarrassments for the Royal Family still to be spilled that are not a yawn for those with some regular knowledge of the last 80 years of British history. There is also good evidence that Bormann had sidelined Hess, Hitler’s nominal deputy, and that Hitler was furious at Hess’s folly and the embarrassment it caused Hitler. So what that on some occasion he might have dropped a facesaving hint that it was all his brilliant idea for a Machiavellian purpose. Of course it was Hess that jumped into Great Britain and ended his days in his 90s in Spandau. I hope you haven’t paid for a shyster’s BS.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    Ah, you do know about the topic.

    So....a simple question then:
    Why keeping that man incarcerated so long?
    The cost, a lot of work....feels a bit over the top.
    Or not?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    So...what's your take on the "Number 7?
    Wasn't hit by a plane, got on fire by debris...got on fire.....and....collapsed.
    Shoddy workmanship?

    Now...I've seen plenty of houses put on fire, by different means (from tank and artillery fire, through various versions of RPG to satchel charges and pure......improvisations....). Or so I say.
    All got on fire.
    Not one collapsed.
    Not.......one..........
    In a third world country, and some of them rather similar to the "Number 7".

    So....what's so SPECIAL about that building?

    All of the towers were built to new discretionary standards and specs which, crucially perhaps, allowed for a lot less concrete to be used. The idea that WTC 7 was demolished as part of a plot that was obviously intended to involve as little reason for suspicion as possible is ridiculous. It added and could have added nothing to the political outcome but added complexity and added likelihood of the conspiracy unravelling or being exposed. (The idea that there were some records there that someone wanted destroyed presupposes that it was guaranteed there were no copies elsewhere).

    In fact the burning all day from a small beginning in WTC 7 fits very well the explanation of the time it took for the North and South Towers to collapse after impact. Where the effect of heat weakened steel was enhanced by there being the weight of an extra 18 floors above the level of impact the building collapsed in a much shorter time. The WTC 7 collapse took all day. No surprise if you just asdume that the collapses were a product of mass above the heat weakened steel and the weakening of the steel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    The WTC 7 collapse took all day. No surprise if you just asdume that the collapses were a product of mass above the heat weakened steel and the weakening of the steel.
     
    Can't say it's implausible.

    Still, my point remains: not ONCE in a rich history of urban warfare and destruction we've seen the same outcome.
    Not..........once......
    In fact, there have been documented cases of similar buildings, fires etc...and ..no collapse. Not....once.

    Makes this case rather unique.
    Could make people a bit curious, even suspicious.

    As for US Government telling the truth to the public.. let alone that one, actually any Government, let's just stop there.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    Yep, and Australia's PM in 1967 wasn't drowned when snorkelling off the rocks at an ocean beach, he was picked up by a Chinese submarine.....

    Three options:

    One:
    You read the book before. Doubt it, somehow. Very much so.

    Two:
    You read the book just now.
    Whooaaahh……..

    What a fast reader. Man………you are……..amazing.
    Took me a couple of weeks to go through all that.
    Whoahh…….

    How do you do that?
    Or, wait…you don’t. You do it even better. You establish some….mystical…connection with a book and, voila….all yours.
    You are simply…….amazing. Amazing.

    Unfortunately, doubt it too. If you had such ability you wouldn’t be posting here. Mere mortals etc….

    Three:
    Let’s leave that out of polite conversation here.

    I’d go for three.
    Keyword “easy”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    If you are just now making up for 30 years of knowing nothing about the relevant history you can believe that there are embarrassments for the Royal Family still to be spilled that are not a yawn for those with some regular knowledge of the last 80 years of British history. There is also good evidence that Bormann had sidelined Hess, Hitler's nominal deputy, and that Hitler was furious at Hess's folly and the embarrassment it caused Hitler. So what that on some occasion he might have dropped a facesaving hint that it was all his brilliant idea for a Machiavellian purpose. Of course it was Hess that jumped into Great Britain and ended his days in his 90s in Spandau. I hope you haven't paid for a shyster's BS.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    So...what's your take on the "Number 7?
    Wasn't hit by a plane, got on fire by debris...got on fire.....and....collapsed.
    Shoddy workmanship?

    Now...I've seen plenty of houses put on fire, by different means (from tank and artillery fire, through various versions of RPG to satchel charges and pure......improvisations....). Or so I say.
    All got on fire.
    Not one collapsed.
    Not.......one..........
    In a third world country, and some of them rather similar to the "Number 7".

    So....what's so SPECIAL about that building?

    To stick to this article though.
    In that part of the world we’ve seen PLENTY of houses put on fire by all means imaginable.
    Can anyone point to one documented case when a house on fire collapsed onto itself as the “Number 7″?

    Just….one……….case…..

    From Lebanon ’82, through Iraq ’91 and ’03.
    When we are on the same topic you are free to use examples of NATO bombing of Yugoslavia too.
    Including Yugoslav forces “work” on Kosovo (and those forces weren’t gentle in dealing with structures to put it mildly).
    Actually, when we are on the same topic any example in Balkan wars from ’91. There were regions there deliberately put on fire (part of ethnic cleansing) and not one collapsed.
    Ah, yes, Libya too.
    And the gem …Syria. Take a look at sheer devastation there.

    And in all that I can’t recollect one building behaving as the “Number 7″.

    So…..?!

    I guess that we’ll have to settle for American shoddy workmanship. And nowhere else. Including ME.
    Funny.

    Actually, it has to be a fuel from a burning civilian plane and shoddy worksmanship.
    Granted….that combination hasn’t been seen anywhere in those “conflicts”.
    Yes…that’s it.
    Explained.

    Moving on. Facebook and shopping await.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    Twice a?
    That's the spirit.
    Admire passionate people with a cause.

    If I may:

    Why did you post it here?
     
    Uhm....free speech?

    Don’t you know their zionist line?
     
    I do.

    Don’t you know that they have nothing but LIES.
     
    Such as?
    There are, probably, something of a truth in that document. Ah, yes, you haven't read it. Makes sense. Sort of...in a certain way.

    I assume you are from the criminal tribe, otherwise you wouldn’t DARE TO POST IT HERE
     
    Curious. Why not?
    I mean, what should I be "daring about"?
    Enlighten me, please.

    These ‘writers’ are working for the war criminals where no one should trust them.
     
    I see. Passion for sure.
    So, we can't trust war criminals. Probably.
    But......should we at least try to hear them? You know, free speech and making own mind?

    So...assumption wise, I can also do that. I assume you are one of those at the receiving end of Israel power there. O.K. You don't want to listen to those enemies of you. Sounds.....interesting.
    Let me guess: you get all you need to know from your elders/superiors/higher ups. Sounds.....liberating. No need to think. Just to feel. Makes sense.

    Anyway....you guys ready for the next round against IDF?

    That analysis doesn’t even make the IDF look good. In fact it shows how weak the IDF really is. Even Nasrallah* would probably agree with most of it. But because it isn’t pure Saker/Southfront propaganda it was apparently enough to blow a few gaskets here.

    I like to troll, but this is just depressing. It isn’t healthy for people to walk around carrying so much delusion and hate; whether it be for Jews or anyone else.

    *Funny story about Nasrallah. According to Israeli intelligence he has a rare genetic disorder that makes him unable to lie. He is like a real life version of Jim Carey’s character from “Liar Liar”. For his part, Nasrallah claims that he can lie, he just generally chooses not to.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    But because it isn’t pure Saker/Southfront propaganda it was apparently enough to blow a few gaskets here.
     
    Of course.

    ...this is just depressing
     
    Not really.
    People blow their gaskets over debating "vegan" vs "vegetarian".

    Whatever people posting here like to believe about themselves they are the same as everywhere else on the Internet. This site is exactly as the rest of the Internet except for the fact that the owner and mods allow different and conflicting opinions. That's the only ...only...difference. I believe it's the most important one.
    Hint: "ignore" button. Keeps the noise out and the air clean.

    For his part, Nasrallah claims that he can lie, he just generally chooses not to
     
    A person engaged in professional politics who does not lie. Now, that is funny.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A few points jump out of this “conversation” to a non-Israel, non-neo-con, non-Russian observer:

    1) The interview mentions prisoner exchange with Israel suggesting that there was an active program being conducted against Israel and that some of the agents/players/etc had been captured. Israel was then, in some sense, under attack and not exactly a simple aggressor, and the attacks into Lebanon might well have been “provoked”.

    2) The pipeline (or some means of passage) seems reasonable since it seems clear that the Sunni Arab “core” was being “encircled” by Shia/Iranian activity from Yemen around to the Med. Why would a pipeline/railroad/air corridor have been so unreasonable to consider? Maybe nothing concrete was accomplished but such a “safe” transport route would seem to make sense to the Sunni Arabs in the face of potential envelopement by “unfriendly” interests.

    3) The cooperation between the Shia forces and others makes tactical sense especially in comparison to the intolerance typically reported for Sunni actors. It was, indeed, useful against ISIS/ISIL and their associates, and maybe an extention of the Alawi “tolerance” in Syria, but the heavy dominance of the Shia/Hizbullah faction does not suggest much of an effective future for other players, especially if future actions against Israel are part of the “plan”.

    4) Israel is mentioned as a cause for the “troubles” but the conclict seems to actually be centered on Sunni/Shia and Turkish/Kurdish/Arab stresses, not to mention the Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas/Palestinian activities. Israel almost seems to be more of an “excuse” or post-facto justification for some other, long-running disputes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Can't address all the sopohtry presented as reasons here as analytical exercises but this quote will take care of no-4 and the rest will topple over each other



    "The invasion of Iraq had been promoted in part as a way to bring democracy to the region and help Israel. Now she argued that because the turmoil in Iraq had led to the rise of Iran, the collective fear of the Sunni world would make Arabs more willing to strike a deal with Israel….

    The Confidante: Condoleezza Rice and the Creation of the Bush Legacy

    Glenn Kessler (Author)

    Now to help you a bit further , go back to 1900 when the powers were courted by Zionist for a country in Palestine in exchange of protecting existing interests or creating new opportunities .

    USA has allowed itself to be stretched logically conceptually and ideologically from one spot to the next from 1965 by Israel openly and collaboratelly . Many examples . One is this simple - America is going to liberate Kuwait ( not liberating Palestine or Golan ) and from there more demands and conditions followed until US ran out of conditions and demands ( unless suicidal capituutaltion of Saddam was included ).
    The ideological talking points underlying these demands have come from AIPAC and like minded incestous bodies.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    I'm not interested in the official story but in the sometimes absurd contortions people go through to uphold a view that the obvious isn't right. The obvious starts with people, principally Osama bin Laden, who wish America harm and have both willing "martyrs" volunteering and a track record of similar suicide attacks. Those who don't like what follows include an amazing number of the truly deluded like those who think it was all CGI. Others though not deluded fail to see many important answers to their usually third hand objections. For an example that I haven't seen addressed before, some truthers pour derision on the idea that four or five men with no more formidable a weapon than a boxcutter could have highjacked a plane. What they overlook was not only the unpreparedness of everyone for such attacks but, specifically, the obvious presumption by all those on board in 2001 that the highjacking is for ransom or for escape to another country. So the reaction would have been initially not to raise the temperature and to stay calm oneself.

    You seem to have learned some of the elementary psychology behind people sticking to bad arguments but fail to apply it to yourself.

    So…what’s your take on the “Number 7?
    Wasn’t hit by a plane, got on fire by debris…got on fire…..and….collapsed.
    Shoddy workmanship?

    Now…I’ve seen plenty of houses put on fire, by different means (from tank and artillery fire, through various versions of RPG to satchel charges and pure……improvisations….). Or so I say.
    All got on fire.
    Not one collapsed.
    Not…….one……….
    In a third world country, and some of them rather similar to the “Number 7″.

    So….what’s so SPECIAL about that building?

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    To stick to this article though.
    In that part of the world we've seen PLENTY of houses put on fire by all means imaginable.
    Can anyone point to one documented case when a house on fire collapsed onto itself as the "Number 7"?

    Just....one..........case.....

    From Lebanon '82, through Iraq '91 and '03.
    When we are on the same topic you are free to use examples of NATO bombing of Yugoslavia too.
    Including Yugoslav forces "work" on Kosovo (and those forces weren't gentle in dealing with structures to put it mildly).
    Actually, when we are on the same topic any example in Balkan wars from '91. There were regions there deliberately put on fire (part of ethnic cleansing) and not one collapsed.
    Ah, yes, Libya too.
    And the gem ...Syria. Take a look at sheer devastation there.

    And in all that I can't recollect one building behaving as the "Number 7".

    So.....?!

    I guess that we'll have to settle for American shoddy workmanship. And nowhere else. Including ME.
    Funny.

    Actually, it has to be a fuel from a burning civilian plane and shoddy worksmanship.
    Granted....that combination hasn't been seen anywhere in those "conflicts".
    Yes...that's it.
    Explained.

    Moving on. Facebook and shopping await.

    , @Wizard of Oz
    All of the towers were built to new discretionary standards and specs which, crucially perhaps, allowed for a lot less concrete to be used. The idea that WTC 7 was demolished as part of a plot that was obviously intended to involve as little reason for suspicion as possible is ridiculous. It added and could have added nothing to the political outcome but added complexity and added likelihood of the conspiracy unravelling or being exposed. (The idea that there were some records there that someone wanted destroyed presupposes that it was guaranteed there were no copies elsewhere).

    In fact the burning all day from a small beginning in WTC 7 fits very well the explanation of the time it took for the North and South Towers to collapse after impact. Where the effect of heat weakened steel was enhanced by there being the weight of an extra 18 floors above the level of impact the building collapsed in a much shorter time. The WTC 7 collapse took all day. No surprise if you just asdume that the collapses were a product of mass above the heat weakened steel and the weakening of the steel.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mulegino1
    And how do you know "that hundreds of crew and passengers were lost to highjacking on 9/11"? Because you saw it on t.v.? Because a first cousin of yours knows the brother of one of the victims' spouses?

    Conan Doyle put it brilliantly when he had Holmes tell Watson: "Whenever you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." A compliant and monolithic media can fabricate legends, but it cannot provide a plausible scenario for the violation of the most fundamental laws of physics.

    How do you explain the self fueling underground fires which burned for months after the events?

    How do you explain how hydrocarbon based office fires started by jet fuel turned most of the structural steel and concrete of the towers into clouds of dust via molecular dissociation? You can't, so you choose to ignore the question entirely. No office fire or airliner impact on earth is able to do this.

    The “official story” prevails but could be blown out of the water by proof that the flights said to be involved never had substantial passenger or crew lists of people who were killed. Any half decent lawyer could get hold of those lists and make it possible to do at least an adequate sample check with probate records, death certificate, obituaries, family.

    As I have noted the official story prevails. The ball is in your court. If you are a serious person stop w**king on the www and organise a test.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    The official story "prevails" only in the imagination of that portion of the public that is too lazy or ignorant to either care or look into the facts, which clearly prove it to be an utter fantasy.

    You are correct about the "test", but such a thing would be superfluous. Anyone familiar with rudimentary ballistics knows that, in order to penetrate structural steel, armor piercing ammunition is required. What kind of round is capable of penetrating a perimeter box column at the alleged point of impact of WTC 2? We are talking about 1/2" of structural steel (not to mention the steel spandrels, which were much thicker and stronger). Would it be a hollow aluminum bullet with a rounded nose (which is what a Boeing 767 was) or an armor piercing round with a sharpened and hardened alloy tip, an alloy jacket and a solid steel core? Since the airliners were allegedly used as missiles, then ballistics enters into the equation.

    But the above is only one in a series of questions. Can a building collapse due to fire damage? Of course it can. Has a steel and concrete skyscraper-other than WTC 1,2 and 7- ever collapsed due to hydrocarbon based fire damage? No. What is the likelihood that twin towers x and z would- although supposedly struck in different areas and levels, "collapse" in the exact same symmetrical manner and approaching (or even exceeding) free fall acceleration- and that most of their steel and concrete components would experience molecular dissociation and form a cloud of hot, toxic dust due to "office fires"? Zero.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    https://www.amazon.com/Double-Standards-Lynn-Picknett/dp/0751532207

    Yep, and Australia’s PM in 1967 wasn’t drowned when snorkelling off the rocks at an ocean beach, he was picked up by a Chinese submarine…..

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    Three options:

    One:
    You read the book before. Doubt it, somehow. Very much so.

    Two:
    You read the book just now.
    Whooaaahh........

    What a fast reader. Man.........you are........amazing.
    Took me a couple of weeks to go through all that.
    Whoahh.......

    How do you do that?
    Or, wait...you don't. You do it even better. You establish some....mystical...connection with a book and, voila....all yours.
    You are simply.......amazing. Amazing.

    Unfortunately, doubt it too. If you had such ability you wouldn't be posting here. Mere mortals etc....

    Three:
    Let's leave that out of polite conversation here.

    I'd go for three.
    Keyword "easy".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anon[807] • Disclaimer says:
    @Twodees Partain
    Regardless of whether Iran has nuclear weapons, their protector, Russia certainly does have them. That could be the reason for the neocon push for war on Russia. The possibility that Israel developed their nuclear weapons in a joint project with China is also part of the tale of how Israel became a nuclear power.

    If that is to be believed, then the US would be regarded as not to blame for Israel developing nuclear weapons. If this is the case, Israel would have been able to develop weapons without also developing nuclear power plants. Is this credible?

    What happens once Putin is gone? There have been attempts on his life a few times. But once his reign comes to an end, will it be able to withstand the pressure? China can . It has centralized ideology driven deep state that will fight for itself and for its allies .

    Trump by his trade war,has exposed the obvious contradictions between the two. Some( neocons) wants China to be part of US led world or is even ready to concede China the supreme roles because the neocons think that they and their deity -Israel- would continue to enjoy the same high priest class privilege . Will China agree? So far it has sent mixed equivocal messages .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mulegino1
    You don't see anything of the kind. In the Hezarkhani video you see a plane that looks like an airliner swallowed up by a building, not colliding with it, which is impossible. The jet fuel would almost certainly have ignited at the point of impact- the perimeter- and not on the other side of the building.

    What those of you who support the official narrative do is to try to explain away all of the anomalies in order to support the narrative and you do so in Procrustean fashion, but it does not work with anyone who has even modest powers of observation and a modicum of critical thinking skills. The official version of 9/11 is ridiculous from every standpoint- the physical, the forensic, the ballistic, the chemical and the pyrotechnic. It is a kosher big lie perpetrated upon a credulous American public.

    I’m not interested in the official story but in the sometimes absurd contortions people go through to uphold a view that the obvious isn’t right. The obvious starts with people, principally Osama bin Laden, who wish America harm and have both willing “martyrs” volunteering and a track record of similar suicide attacks. Those who don’t like what follows include an amazing number of the truly deluded like those who think it was all CGI. Others though not deluded fail to see many important answers to their usually third hand objections. For an example that I haven’t seen addressed before, some truthers pour derision on the idea that four or five men with no more formidable a weapon than a boxcutter could have highjacked a plane. What they overlook was not only the unpreparedness of everyone for such attacks but, specifically, the obvious presumption by all those on board in 2001 that the highjacking is for ransom or for escape to another country. So the reaction would have been initially not to raise the temperature and to stay calm oneself.

    You seem to have learned some of the elementary psychology behind people sticking to bad arguments but fail to apply it to yourself.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    So...what's your take on the "Number 7?
    Wasn't hit by a plane, got on fire by debris...got on fire.....and....collapsed.
    Shoddy workmanship?

    Now...I've seen plenty of houses put on fire, by different means (from tank and artillery fire, through various versions of RPG to satchel charges and pure......improvisations....). Or so I say.
    All got on fire.
    Not one collapsed.
    Not.......one..........
    In a third world country, and some of them rather similar to the "Number 7".

    So....what's so SPECIAL about that building?
    , @Mulegino1
    What is for you "obvious" is certainly not "right", since it is merely an officially sanctioned narrative manufactured by the media at the behest of officialdom, constructed from the top down, unlike a real case constructed upon a painstaking evaluation of factual evidence. The narrative starts out with a media driven pronouncement, "Osama bin Laden, box cutters, 19 hijackers, commercial airliners hitting buildings, collapse due to office fires, etc."

    In reality, there were no "collapses." The destruction of WTC 1, 2, 7 (along with the entire core of WTC 6) did not involve "collapses", it involved the disintegration of most of the metallic and concrete components of the Twin Towers via explosive energy, and the implosion of WTC 7 in a more conventional manner. When dealing with steel and concrete skyscrapers, fire damage is never going to lead to symmetrical and universal collapse at free fall acceleration. It will not happen and it did not happen on 9/11.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @A C
    This is the biggest load of trash article I have EVER read on the Middle East and considering both right and left wing garbage that is out there, that is saying something.

    This reads like a straight propaganda piece written by Hizbullah. Where is the in-depth commentary regarding how much people loath Nasrallah (truth) and how Hizbullah has deliberately hidden the murderers of Rafic Hariri? Where is the investigation and comment regarding all of the political assassinations done by Hizbullah at the behest of their Syrian and Iranian overlords. Where are the interviews with people in Lebanon who had to suffer through several israeli strikes that are not Hizbullah stooges? How about speaking to Lebanese who will NEVER give legitimacy to a band of thugs and murderers.

    This is not even a semblance of journalism. It is a propaganda piece crafted to read like an article and just disgusting.

    The way it works is that you have to know a thing or two that didn’t come from a TV talking head’s mouth before you can form an opinion. As it stands, you don’t have an opinion.

    Read More
    • Replies: @A C
    Thanks for assuming I am too stupid to form an opinion outside of what a talking head tells me. I am lebanese. I have lived in Lebanon, I have seen up close and personal what Hizbullah does and what they are capable of.

    Have you?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Begemot
    We can see that the Israeli military is very capable when going up against the unarmed. The Passover Massacre was the latest IDF victory. Even the Wehrmacht couldn't get kill ratios like that against the Soviets. I can see why you think they're so good. However, that isn't good training for battle against real men. Your confidence may be misplaced.

    This is just a bait but I’ll go with it.
    Maybe somebody else will come with something of a substance.

    I can see why you think they’re so good.

    Doubt it.
    They are not as good as their opponents there are so bad.

    However, that isn’t good training for battle against real men.

    Neither is Hezbollah engagement in Syria good training for fighting against IDF.

    Your confidence may be misplaced.

    Works both ways.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @mcohen
    The transition from non state actor to legal basis of sovereignty is the difference between infantry and f 35 jets.
    Drugs,protection rackets,useful thugs may pay the way short term but real power will allude.
    The spread of cheap autonomous a.i driven military hardware will change this equation.imagine a miniature self drive car that is a car bomb
    And that will be the end of that said the cat.

    Your comment is unconvincing to say the least. I would imagine that the same fate awaits them as that encountered by the “invincible Israeli tanks”.

    Once a majority of Americans realise who exactly has been undermining their nation and society and who has incited these disgraceful and costly wars, Israel will “stand” as a pariah state without the outrageous funding from the US taxpayer. The awareness of perpetrating 9/11 will be the kicker. Overreach R Us would seem a motto that best fits you and yours.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    Twice a?
    That's the spirit.
    Admire passionate people with a cause.

    If I may:

    Why did you post it here?
     
    Uhm....free speech?

    Don’t you know their zionist line?
     
    I do.

    Don’t you know that they have nothing but LIES.
     
    Such as?
    There are, probably, something of a truth in that document. Ah, yes, you haven't read it. Makes sense. Sort of...in a certain way.

    I assume you are from the criminal tribe, otherwise you wouldn’t DARE TO POST IT HERE
     
    Curious. Why not?
    I mean, what should I be "daring about"?
    Enlighten me, please.

    These ‘writers’ are working for the war criminals where no one should trust them.
     
    I see. Passion for sure.
    So, we can't trust war criminals. Probably.
    But......should we at least try to hear them? You know, free speech and making own mind?

    So...assumption wise, I can also do that. I assume you are one of those at the receiving end of Israel power there. O.K. You don't want to listen to those enemies of you. Sounds.....interesting.
    Let me guess: you get all you need to know from your elders/superiors/higher ups. Sounds.....liberating. No need to think. Just to feel. Makes sense.

    Anyway....you guys ready for the next round against IDF?

    We can see that the Israeli military is very capable when going up against the unarmed. The Passover Massacre was the latest IDF victory. Even the Wehrmacht couldn’t get kill ratios like that against the Soviets. I can see why you think they’re so good. However, that isn’t good training for battle against real men. Your confidence may be misplaced.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    This is just a bait but I'll go with it.
    Maybe somebody else will come with something of a substance.

    I can see why you think they’re so good.
     
    Doubt it.
    They are not as good as their opponents there are so bad.

    However, that isn’t good training for battle against real men.
     
    Neither is Hezbollah engagement in Syria good training for fighting against IDF.

    Your confidence may be misplaced.
     
    Works both ways.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @A C
    This is the biggest load of trash article I have EVER read on the Middle East and considering both right and left wing garbage that is out there, that is saying something.

    This reads like a straight propaganda piece written by Hizbullah. Where is the in-depth commentary regarding how much people loath Nasrallah (truth) and how Hizbullah has deliberately hidden the murderers of Rafic Hariri? Where is the investigation and comment regarding all of the political assassinations done by Hizbullah at the behest of their Syrian and Iranian overlords. Where are the interviews with people in Lebanon who had to suffer through several israeli strikes that are not Hizbullah stooges? How about speaking to Lebanese who will NEVER give legitimacy to a band of thugs and murderers.

    This is not even a semblance of journalism. It is a propaganda piece crafted to read like an article and just disgusting.

    This is the biggest load of trash article I have EVER read on the Middle East and considering both right and left wing garbage that is out there, that is saying something.

    A C,

    Oh my — This is the biggest hasbara troll comment I have EVER read on the Middle East.

    Nasrallah is good man who looks out for his people.

    Shame on the Jews for not supporting him.

    The world knows that Netanyahu and the Israelis are the true terrorists and assassins.

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Art

    Read More
    • Replies: @A C
    I am Lebanese. I have seen what these people do up close and personal. I am not Jewish nor have I ever seen the inside of Israel or Palestine. I don't care to see them as I have no fondness at all for the area.

    What I do care about is the sanitizing of a militia that commits murder every time their leash is pulled by their masters. I care about the fact that this writer has written the most bias piece of garbage on this topic I have ever read.

    Do you speak Arabic fluently? I do. I see all of Nasrallah's speeches. all of them. in his native language. Believe me, this sanitizing is not a good thing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @A C
    This is the biggest load of trash article I have EVER read on the Middle East and considering both right and left wing garbage that is out there, that is saying something.

    This reads like a straight propaganda piece written by Hizbullah. Where is the in-depth commentary regarding how much people loath Nasrallah (truth) and how Hizbullah has deliberately hidden the murderers of Rafic Hariri? Where is the investigation and comment regarding all of the political assassinations done by Hizbullah at the behest of their Syrian and Iranian overlords. Where are the interviews with people in Lebanon who had to suffer through several israeli strikes that are not Hizbullah stooges? How about speaking to Lebanese who will NEVER give legitimacy to a band of thugs and murderers.

    This is not even a semblance of journalism. It is a propaganda piece crafted to read like an article and just disgusting.

    Well, Mr A+C “No recent commenting history”, now you know what it is like for actually informed people to have to read all the laughable demonising propaganda tripe about Hezbollah fed to us every day by the establishment media in the US sphere.

    If you need more interviews with Hezbollah’s enemies about how horrible Hezbollah is, to feed your intentionally distorted ideas about the ME, you only need to head back to the pages of just about any major newspaper, or watch just about any major network. It’s probably best for you just to do that. Your comment suggests you might seriously not be able to cope with much more journalism that doesn’t have the gross slant you are used to for a while.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mulegino1
    And how do you know "that hundreds of crew and passengers were lost to highjacking on 9/11"? Because you saw it on t.v.? Because a first cousin of yours knows the brother of one of the victims' spouses?

    Conan Doyle put it brilliantly when he had Holmes tell Watson: "Whenever you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." A compliant and monolithic media can fabricate legends, but it cannot provide a plausible scenario for the violation of the most fundamental laws of physics.

    How do you explain the self fueling underground fires which burned for months after the events?

    How do you explain how hydrocarbon based office fires started by jet fuel turned most of the structural steel and concrete of the towers into clouds of dust via molecular dissociation? You can't, so you choose to ignore the question entirely. No office fire or airliner impact on earth is able to do this.

    See the site Dr. Judy Wood.com, the WTC Towers and assorted buildings were taken down by a particle beam weapon.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @A C
    This is the biggest load of trash article I have EVER read on the Middle East and considering both right and left wing garbage that is out there, that is saying something.

    This reads like a straight propaganda piece written by Hizbullah. Where is the in-depth commentary regarding how much people loath Nasrallah (truth) and how Hizbullah has deliberately hidden the murderers of Rafic Hariri? Where is the investigation and comment regarding all of the political assassinations done by Hizbullah at the behest of their Syrian and Iranian overlords. Where are the interviews with people in Lebanon who had to suffer through several israeli strikes that are not Hizbullah stooges? How about speaking to Lebanese who will NEVER give legitimacy to a band of thugs and murderers.

    This is not even a semblance of journalism. It is a propaganda piece crafted to read like an article and just disgusting.

    This reads like a straight propaganda piece written by Hizbullah.

    and

    This is not even a semblance of journalism. It is a propaganda piece crafted to read like an article and just disgusting.

    Agree.

    Well..one could approach that as:
    All over the MSM we see the “Hezbolllah bad”, so, not bad to see something of a difference, sometimes.

    As in the About->Overview section on the top of this site.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • This is the biggest load of trash article I have EVER read on the Middle East and considering both right and left wing garbage that is out there, that is saying something.

    This reads like a straight propaganda piece written by Hizbullah. Where is the in-depth commentary regarding how much people loath Nasrallah (truth) and how Hizbullah has deliberately hidden the murderers of Rafic Hariri? Where is the investigation and comment regarding all of the political assassinations done by Hizbullah at the behest of their Syrian and Iranian overlords. Where are the interviews with people in Lebanon who had to suffer through several israeli strikes that are not Hizbullah stooges? How about speaking to Lebanese who will NEVER give legitimacy to a band of thugs and murderers.

    This is not even a semblance of journalism. It is a propaganda piece crafted to read like an article and just disgusting.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    This reads like a straight propaganda piece written by Hizbullah.
     
    and

    This is not even a semblance of journalism. It is a propaganda piece crafted to read like an article and just disgusting.
     
    Agree.

    Well..one could approach that as:
    All over the MSM we see the "Hezbolllah bad", so, not bad to see something of a difference, sometimes.

    As in the About->Overview section on the top of this site.
    , @Randal
    Well, Mr A+C "No recent commenting history", now you know what it is like for actually informed people to have to read all the laughable demonising propaganda tripe about Hezbollah fed to us every day by the establishment media in the US sphere.

    If you need more interviews with Hezbollah's enemies about how horrible Hezbollah is, to feed your intentionally distorted ideas about the ME, you only need to head back to the pages of just about any major newspaper, or watch just about any major network. It's probably best for you just to do that. Your comment suggests you might seriously not be able to cope with much more journalism that doesn't have the gross slant you are used to for a while.
    , @Art
    This is the biggest load of trash article I have EVER read on the Middle East and considering both right and left wing garbage that is out there, that is saying something.

    A C,

    Oh my -- This is the biggest hasbara troll comment I have EVER read on the Middle East.

    Nasrallah is good man who looks out for his people.

    Shame on the Jews for not supporting him.

    The world knows that Netanyahu and the Israelis are the true terrorists and assassins.

    Think Peace --- Do No Harm --- Art
    , @Twodees Partain
    The way it works is that you have to know a thing or two that didn't come from a TV talking head's mouth before you can form an opinion. As it stands, you don't have an opinion.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jilles dykstra
    Wise jews, they exist, and existed, even in Israel around the sixties, warned, when Perez began developing the atomic bomb, that it would be only a matter of time before neighbouring countries would have theses weapons too.
    The idea is that Iran does not have them, I doubt this.

    Regardless of whether Iran has nuclear weapons, their protector, Russia certainly does have them. That could be the reason for the neocon push for war on Russia. The possibility that Israel developed their nuclear weapons in a joint project with China is also part of the tale of how Israel became a nuclear power.

    If that is to be believed, then the US would be regarded as not to blame for Israel developing nuclear weapons. If this is the case, Israel would have been able to develop weapons without also developing nuclear power plants. Is this credible?

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    What happens once Putin is gone? There have been attempts on his life a few times. But once his reign comes to an end, will it be able to withstand the pressure? China can . It has centralized ideology driven deep state that will fight for itself and for its allies .

    Trump by his trade war,has exposed the obvious contradictions between the two. Some( neocons) wants China to be part of US led world or is even ready to concede China the supreme roles because the neocons think that they and their deity -Israel- would continue to enjoy the same high priest class privilege . Will China agree? So far it has sent mixed equivocal messages .
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Coverage of Hezbollah is welcome, but wish the article were better written. Many sentences would not make it through English 101.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twitchy Bill
    Hizbullah has two doomsday weapons.

    (1) as a non-state actor Hizbullah can counter CIA impunity with rough justice. The US is increasingly confined to clandestine war: undeclared and not only illegal but subject to certain abatements of Geneva Convention protections for captured agents. If you need to bag another Buckley and sweat him for inculpatory evidence, Hizbullah's the pros from Dover who you go to. Russia and Iran are assembling a bill of indictment of CIA crimes of concern to the international community. Hizbullah's the bad cop. Don't like it? Go ahead, bring them to justice. In lawfare against Hizbullah, Israel will be the loser.

    https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1121&context=annlsurvey

    (2) Hizbullah is a programmatic NGO. Programmatic NGOs provide services that do important duties of the state. This cements hearts and minds and establishes the legal basis for sovereignty. The US government is terrified of programmatic NGOs. Even in its Heimat in the USA, the government attacks programmatic NGOs with everything they've got. In Greater Palestine Hizbullah can put down the substrate for a new UAR, or a United Palestinian Republic. Hell, their tenets could unite the whole global South.

    The transition from non state actor to legal basis of sovereignty is the difference between infantry and f 35 jets.
    Drugs,protection rackets,useful thugs may pay the way short term but real power will allude.
    The spread of cheap autonomous a.i driven military hardware will change this equation.imagine a miniature self drive car that is a car bomb
    And that will be the end of that said the cat.

    Read More
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    Your comment is unconvincing to say the least. I would imagine that the same fate awaits them as that encountered by the "invincible Israeli tanks".

    Once a majority of Americans realise who exactly has been undermining their nation and society and who has incited these disgraceful and costly wars, Israel will "stand" as a pariah state without the outrageous funding from the US taxpayer. The awareness of perpetrating 9/11 will be the kicker. Overreach R Us would seem a motto that best fits you and yours.
    , @Twitchy Bill
    Monsieur Cohen, very true. The legal basis for sovereignty is a long way off. As you know, legal sovereignty is responsibility: that is, good-faith accession to the UN Charter, the International Bill of Human Rights, and the Rome Statute - at a minimum. Since Israel routinely uses force in manifest breach of the UN Charter, flouts all three instruments of the International Bill of Human Rights, and has failed to accede to the Rome Statute, Israel has forfeited its sovereignty in law. This triggers the obligations erga omnes of the Responsibility to Protect. Hopefully the world can stop Israel's aggression, crimes against humanity, and genocide without recourse to R2P pillar 3.

    Hizbullah is clearly preparing to fill the void of Israel's catastrophic failure to protect their indigenous Palestinian majority. It takes time and patient diplomacy to demonstrate responsibility to the UN member nations that will recognize the successor state of the criminal Israeli regime.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.