The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / On "Disney"
 All Comments / On "Disney"
    The Left dominates the culture, but it does not (yet) completely control it—hence, for example, the War On Christmas Resistance, Gamergate, and of course the election of Donald J. Trump. Now Star Wars Episode VIII (The Last Jedi), released in mid-December to resounding applause from Main Stream Media reviewers is tanking, well behind the 2015...
  • @KenH

    You cannot treat the klan or neo-nazis sympathetically. If that’s what you want you might want to fly off to another planet.
     
    Then you can’t treat the Black Panthers, the Bloods, the Crips, the NOI or BLM sympathetically either. If that’s what you want then get a one way ticket to your ancestral Africa.

    It’s a shame more of that didn’t happen in real life. Nat Turner and John Brown were heroes.
     
    It’s also a shame that African blacks were brought to this continent or that after the civil war they weren’t eliminated outright or repatriated back to Africa. President Lincoln was assassinated before he could effect the latter. Poor whites suffered greatly, too, and slavery impoverished them since it’s impossible to compete with slave labor.

    Just to be fair (((Hollywood))) should make a movie based on The Turner Diaries to foster and raise white racial consciousness and depict ALL blacks as mortal enemies deserving of the ultimate punishment. I’m sure you’d be fine with that.

    I’d rather take to word of the Smithsonian over a racist troll like you.
     
    Not sure if suffer from severe presbyopia , but the two photos of the negress math wizards clearly show them as light skinned blacks or almost white (in the case of Katherine Johnson) just like the “racist troll” said. I believe those women should be recognized for their efforts, but the Smithsonian can spare us the embellished and politically correct account which turns them into linchpins of the space program. But believe what you must to bolster your fragile self-esteem.

    Like virtually all white nationalists you are not in touch with reality whatsoever.
     
    You’re beyond hopeless if you think Jews and European whites are one people. That belief betrays your simple mindedness. You remind me of the blacks who think that every oriental they encounter is Chinese not realizing that there are Japanese, Vietnamese, Koreans, Laotian, etc.

    I read the Turner Diaries just last year. Not necessarily great for me , but very entertaining.

    So, some enterprising small-time USA people should just make a film of it. Forget Hellywood, just make it!

    Had a revelation in the last two days, Pahlaniuk’s Fight Club is based on the Turner Diaries, just watered down.

    He is so stupid, I have the version of Fight Club where you can switch to listen to Pittt boasting, Norton saying stupid things, the jewish ‘Englishwoman’ playing very English, and Pahlaniuk just sounding like a moron.

    I am convinced that Fight Club is based on the Turner Diaries, not least because Pahlaniuk is audibly a cretin.

    Have never read a Pahlaniuk story, tried at times at bookshops, too boring, but have read Turner Diaries and seen Fight Club,

    So the latter is based on the former.

    Anybody wanting to make a movie of the Turner Diaries would find many willing people,

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    Holding up the (Jewish) Disney corporation acquisition of (Gentile) George Lucas’s SW property as an example of the same process as the formation of the (Gentile) Christian heritage on the mouldering bones of the Hebraic (Jewish) tradition reads like a sort of Satanic inversion.

    The new STAR WARS or STAR SCHWARZ made things much worse, but Lucas ruined it long long ago. He came up with a great vision but emotionally grew backward and made the Saga about nothing but toys, special effects, and pandering to kids. Despite their faults, STAR WARS and EMPIRE worked as storytelling and set up a great finale. Luke vs Darth. But RETURN OF JEDI was filled with fish-headed generals and jungle teddy bears. Also, Lucas had the tendency to combine naive infantilism with quasi-tendentious sermonizing. So, he said that Ewoks were like the Viet Cong because US, the great industrial power, was defeated by jungle warriors of Vietnam. But this is silly. The battle takes place in a single afternoon in RETURN and just a handful of Ewoks die. In contrast, Vietnam War lasted for 8 yrs(officially and unofficially even longer), and at least 2 million Viets died and many got wounded. Also, the viets were not a hunter-gatherer tribe with stone age weapons but armed and supplied by the OTHER GREAT INDUSTRIAL Power, the Soviets. But Lucas gave us teddy bears in space and then made some bogus pompous political statements, like he is Colonel Kurtz in APOCALYPSE NOW or something. It was funny seeing a man getting sillier and more serious at the same time. And the whole STAR WARS is like that. In some ways, it gets darker and more 'complicated'. We discover Darth is really pa of Luke, and Luke is tempted to the Dark Side. And the prequels say something about how democracy can turn into tyranny. And yet, at the center of the narrative is just a lot of hokum and kiddie stuff. STAR WARS could have been EXCALIBUR IN SPACE but it just became a big pinball machine.

    That STAR WARS got Jewishized into STAR SCHWARZ is interesting given that the core inspiration of the STAR WARS universe is pagan. Even though Lucas drew some ideas from the Bible and Judeo-Christian tradition, it owes more to paganism of Greco-Roman mythology, Germanic mythology, Japanese samurai cult & Kurosawa films, Arthurian legends, the Western, and 20th century Fascist-Nazi aesthetics. It was about the brotherhood of knighthood, the cult of the warrior.
    And of course, STAR SCHWARZ continues in that vein. It still owes more to paganist inspirations than anything in the Bible. And yet, why is it Jewishy? Because there are many aspects to Jewishness. There is core Jewishness of religion and heritage. But there is also the Pawnbroker Jewishness, the art of merchantry where Jews take control of pagan/gentile icons & idols and use/exploit them to serve the Jewish agenda. It's like a Jewish pawnbroker wasn't a collector of only Jewish stuff. He gained ownership of tons of goy, pagan, gentile stuff. He used them for profits or props to push Jewish interests.
    In our world, Jews promote Diversity and Interracism on whites. Diversity weakens white unity and white power. Interracism destroys white male pride, thus whites become cucked. So, even though STAR SCHWARZ is still paganist, those paganist altars have been altered to favor the political and ideological agenda of Jewish Globalist Power. This is also true of homomania. The history of homo cult is paganist. It was biggest among pagan Greeks and decadent Romans. And some pagan tribes were tolerant of homo stuff. Samurai could bugger one another sometimes. In contrast, Jewish history was anti-homo. So, how did Jews, even religious Jews, become such promoters of Homomania? Because this paganism can be used by Jews to weaken gentiles. By promoting Homos as wonderful elites, society normalizes the notion of the minority ruling elite. Also, by weakening the moral core of Christians by making churches adopt homomania, Christians no longer have true moral pride. Any people who worship homo fecal penetration as holy cannot be truly moral. They are degenerates whose moral righteousness depends on hype, hysteria, and propaganda than moral depth or meaning.

    Jews tend to be monomaniacal and seek world dominance, and there have been three ways of going about achieving this. (1) Sticking to Jewish tradition and the Covenant. Keeping strict barriers between holy Jews and filthy goyim. This school of thought said if Jews remain clean and serve God, God will take care of things and favor Jews, and Jews will inherit the earth. (2) Creating a new universal idea(as outgrowth of tribal Jewishness) and spreading that idea to destroy all other ideas. Christianity and Communism were such Jewish ideas. The ideal of Christianity that began as Jewish heresy is to convert the whole world to Jesus and to destroy all other ideas. Paganisms of all kinds must be destroyed. Non-believers are heathens and must be converted or condemned. Communism was a secular kind of Christianity. Supposedly, Marx figured everything out, and only communism was the truth, and all other ideas had to be destroyed or exterminated. The whole world must be made communist. One idea for all mankind.

    The problem of (1) was that extreme tribalism didn't do much for Jews in terms of power. NO matter how pure they were remained in blood and no matter how much they remained faithful to God, Jews didn't inherit the world. As for (2), even though those ideas began as Jewish ideas, gentiles eventually took control of them, and Jews got burned. Christians began to persecute Jews. And communism eventually suppressed Jewish identity. And then, even Jewish communists came to be suspected and marginalized as untrustworthy.

    But there was (3) way. By this way, Jews would accept the existence of pagan/gentile ideas. Jews would accept the poly-ideastic way of the world. Unlike (1) Jews, the (3) Jews would extensively engage with the gentile world. But unlike (2) Jews, they would not try to conquer the world with one idea, like Christianity or Communism. Rather, they would allow various ideas/interests to exist BUT have those ideas/interests serve the Higher and Greater ideas/interests of Jews. It's like the Roman Empire. It allowed non-Romans to keep their cultures and etc. But the Empire also insisted that non-Romans all serve Roman agendas and interests in the end. Instead of universalism where everyone has the same ideas, icons, and idols, it'd be a poly-versal empire where various peoples would stick to their ideas, icons, and idols that, however, would be manipulated to serve the Higher Idea. So, Jews adopted a kind of neo-paganism for their own purposes. In pagan cosmology, there are various gods, but there is also the top god, and the lower gods serve the top god. Jewish manipulation of neo-paganism had non-Jews as lesser gods serving Jews as the top gods. This way, pagans/gentiles could have their own identities and cultures... but they would ultimately bow down to the higher identity and culture of Jews.

    And we see this with how STAR WARS became STAR SCHWARZ. It is still very pagan and steeped in the Carl-Jung-Joseph-Campbell thing, but it now favors feminism, jungle fever, Diversity, and etc to occupy what were essentially roles defined by European pagans. But we see the same thing with BBC. British and European histories are retconned to push the Jewish agenda of Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs with Jungle Fever for white women and cuckery for white men. Hollywood Jews said the next James Bond will be a Negro.
    The great western heroes, Lancelot and Achilles, have been made black in BBC and TV shows. So, even as Jews maintain the pagan idols, they change the cast to push the Jewish agenda of perpetuating white submissivism so that whites will forever lose white pride and identity. A people without pride become mental slaves and serve OTHER peoples.

    https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bXWv5Is_X9Q/WklRiiULqWI/AAAAAAAABzs/0rRGyUooP3QkTDGQdIKAoRbNVGmYgtUmQCLcBGAs/s1600/DSU_1m1X4AECoJE.jpg

    Communism and Christianity(and Islam) were mono-imperial systems. Ideally, all of humanity should come under the One True Idea, and all men must struggle for the exact same principles and goals. Both have roots in Jewish culture because Jews developed the notion of the One God and One Truth, with all other gods deserving to be either holocausted or denied their validity/existence.

    In contrast, there was the poly-imperial systems. It attempted to conquer as many lands and people as possible. But it didn't believe there was one true idea for all. It was more about power and control than conversion. So, other peoples, the conquered subjects, could believe in their own gods, stick with their own traditions/values, and worship their own idols. However, they had to accept the Imperial Rulers as the top power. They had to pay taxes to the top power. They had to bow down to the military might of the top power. Romans were like this,and the Romans managed well with most pagan folks. But they had the most problem with Jews because, unlike pagans, Jews believed their God was the only true God. So, Romans had the stronger military and greater material power, but Jews had the stronger idea, greater spiritual might, and farther-reaching prophetic vision. Romans could win with arms, but Jews could win with vision. But to win, Jews had to develop an idea that could win over the hearts of gentiles/pagans. And that was Christianity. In a way, the spread of Christianity was a great triumph of the Jewish idea over gentiles. But because most Jews didn't take to the new faith and stuck with their own original concept, the Jewish Heresy turned on them. So, Christianity was both the biggest triumph and tragedy for Jews. Communism would turn out similarly. Jews won big and lost big with it.

    So, what is the best way for Jews to win? Self-enclosed tribalism won't get anywhere. Jews must engage with the whole world that is goyim. Should Jews come up with a universal idea for all mankind? But then, gentiles will eventually come to own the idea and use it for their own interests, and this might hurt Jews.
    Given those odds, the best way is for Jews to make peace with gentile ideas, icons, and interests but find some way to make them serve Jewish identity, ideas, and interests as the highest and greatest there is. It's like how Jews work with Evangelicals. Jews are okay with the born-again folks worshiping Jesus and etc, BUT much of Evangelicalism is now 'muh Israel, muh Israel, muh Israel'. Jews work well with Mormons, but Mormons are all about 'muh Israel, muh Israel, muh Israel'. So, Jews are okay with Mormons being Mormons BUT Mormons better still put Jewish interests above Mormon interests. It's like Romans were okay with Syrians and Britons, but those conquered folks still had to obey Roman power before their own. Even as Romans didn't erase other people's cultures and idols, those had to be made subservient to Roman culture and idols as the highest there are.
    And modern Jews adopted this, esp from Anglos, the modern folks who come closest to being like the Romans of old. So, the US is now about diversity and how different folks can have their own cultures, identities, and narratives... BUT they better put 'muh Israel' before anything. Jews don't have to attend meetings for Russian, Iranian, Chinese, Mexican, African, etc interests BUT all gentile politicians have to attend AIPAC to praise 'muh Israel'. Look at that whore Nikki Haley, the semi-person-of-dot.

    The COEN movie HAIL CAESAR offers a useful glimpse into this Jewish agenda. Like some other Coen movies, it is pretty mocking of Christianity as a religion that controls the goyim. Even though goyim have used Christianity to oppress Jews, it also tames goyim and turns them into saps who can be manipulated by Jews.
    Some people think Coens are respectful of Christianity. They are not. What they are interested in is the psycho-politics of Christianity, and in this, they share something with Steven Spielberg who has adopted Catholicist and Evangelical tropes to push his vision of Pop Jewishism on the world.

    In a scene in HAIL CAESAR we see a Rabbi who is offended by what Christian clergy has to say. Even though Jews have been anti-Christian, there's a kind of paradox. Jews have been so anti-Christian because they are so Christoid, conviction that Jewish individuals could become like Christ. The main problem that Jews have with Christianity is it deified the prophet and messiah into Son of God or even God. The Jewish idea of the Messiah was a great prophet, warrior, messenger. Jews never conceived of messiah as God or even Son of God. Jewish concept of the messiah is empowering because the messiah is a prophet, and a man can be a prophet. So, by the Jewish concept of the messiah, any Jewish man can, at least theoretically, be a messiah since he could be the great prophet. In contrast, Christianity says the messiah is not a prophet but the Son of God or God Himself. And that means there is no more Future. The Truth has been revealed through Jesus the Son of God, and humanity has no more need for prophets. After Jesus, there can only be saints. Saints are different from prophets. Saints don't have the great vision. They just have the pure faith in God and Jesus. Their duty is to be angelic and devoted. They are not seers of the Future since the Truth has already been revealed. Thus, Christianity destroyed the prophetic tradition. It allowed for many saints but no prophets. In contrast, Jews never gave up on the notion of the prophet. Since the messiah has yet to come and since a man can be a prophet and since a prophet can be the messiah, any Jewish man can, at least theoretically, be the prophet-messiah.

    In some ways, Christianity is more hubristic than Judaism, but in some ways, it is more humble. It is more hubristic in the notion that a Man who walks on Earth can be the Son of God, even God. To Jews, this was pure blasphemy, an affront to God.
    And yet, precisely because Jesus wasn't just a great prophet but Son of God or God as the Messiah, no other man can ever come anywhere near Him or be like Him. He is the ONLY Man who could be the Messiah since Christianity says Messiah = Son of God = God.

    In contrast, Judaism can be said to be more humble because it says no man can be the Son of God or God. God is too great and doesn't manifest Himself in human form. And yet, because the Jewish concept of the Messiah is a prophet, any Jew could conceivably be him. Granted, the Messiah could be like an angel sent from Heaven. Even so, he is still not Son of God or God. He is still closer to man if not a man. Since Jews defined the Messiah in this manner, each Jew is instilled with propheticism which is far more ambitious and egoistic than sainthood, which is about devotion and faith. A prophet is humble before God but confident of his vision as the messenger of God. In contrast, a saint is not about the power of mind and vision but goodness of the heart and faith. It's a bit sappy.

    In the conference with rabbi and Christian clergy in HAIL CAESAR, the rabbi says God cannot be shown in Jewish culture. And in the movie, we are not shown the face of Jesus in the movie-within-the-movie. But we see a lot of the Roman soldier. And we see the shabbos goy gentile studio boss, but we are never shown his Jewish boss Schenk who is like a godly presence. Both the Roman soldier(George Clooney) and the goy studio boss have two modes of behavior: soldier and saint. As soldier, he is rough and aggressive. But when faced with the greater prophetic power of Jesus, he goes into saint mode with sappy face. And the goy studio boss is the same way. He can be tough and push actors around. He whips the crew to get the job done. He is warrior-like in that mode. But he is deeply respectful to his boss Schenk who is like a divine prophet to him.(Schenk is like the Jewish prophet of capitalism; Marcuse is like Jewish prophet of communism; Hollywood is divided between two modes.) Schenk apparently has the vision whereas his shabbos goy underling can manage things but lacks the big vision. After all, Jews invented Hollywood, the empire of dreams where gentile-pagan idols and icons came to be reshaped to serve the Jewish Empire.

    HAIL CAESAR is a rather confused movie because its allusions are often double-or-triple-in-meaning. There is Scarlett Johansson as Rhinemaiden of Wagner's mythology. But she is swallowed up by what? Whale that swallowed Jonah? This Jewish whale also swallows the gold and then its blowhole ejaculates like Harvey Weinstein's pud. But later, this woman is like a perverse allusion to the Madonna. She is pregnant with a child from a uncertain father and she ends up marrying a guy named Joe, like Mary was married to Joseph. So,a character is alluded to both Germanic mythology and the Biblical story. Weird. And later a Soviet submarine emerges like the whale. I guess Sovietism is like the other Jewish creation. Whale of communism vs Whale of capitalism, both trying to devour the wealth of the world as a good or an evil. But the guy loses the money in the water cuz of the dog(like the dog that messed up the heist in THE KILLING by Kubrick). It's a very confused movie, but also a very inspired and interesting one. I can understand why it flopped at the box office. Though a comedy, there's a lot more going on there which is esoteric.

    Anyway, the movie is onto something. We tend to see history in terms of Jews vs Christianity but it's more like Future Christoidism vs Been-there-done-there-Christianism.
    Christianity says the Christ was among us, and He was Son of God, thus God, and we all need to be saints with sappy faces like when George Clooney looks at Jesus who offers him water.
    In contrast, Jews believe the Future is filled with new christoids with prophetic vision. Jews accept Jesus as prophet but not messiah. So, Christ was only a prophet, and that means there can be future christs or christoids... like Marx, Rand, Marcuse, etc. And the 20th century has been filled with Jewish prophets and would-be prophets. And this has been a source of great power for Jews. In the end, the stronger idea gains dominance over weaker ones. And the fact is the prophet is more powerful than the saint. Saint is a pawn on the chess board whereas the prophet is the rook or queen. Saint blindly and sappily serves and obeys the king. The queen and rook serve the king too but have their own agency and greater reach in movement.

    Because Jews are still in prophetic mode whereas Christians are in saint mode, the globalist empire has the weaker saintly ideas of gentiles serving the stronger prophetic ideas of Jews.

    lo Priss.

    Interesting comment, as always.

    For the OT, tale of Lot.

    For now, Israelis are at the centre of world trade in MDA and MDMA. and the soldiiers takiog them comnonly bugger each other.

    Have heard it from them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Not white, just white hetero-sexual males.
    My teenager noticed this right away.
    All the leaders of the “good guys” = women.
    All the leaders of the “bad guys” = white hetero-sexual males.
    Not too subtle there guys.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The Alt-Right: White Privilege doesn’t exist
    Also the Alt-Right: I have so few problems in life that I have the time and energy to get palpably upset over a dumb space opera because it has too many minorities.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Hadji Gegenraum
    Carl Schmitt was the 'Crown Jurist" in Germany who 'justified' Hitler's assent to power, arguing that the response to the 'Reichstag Fire' required the utilization of "Emergency Powers" hence paving the way to dictatorship.

    It was Schmitt who influenced the "NeoCons" many of whom had studied with a philosophy professor Leo Strauss, whom was a devotee of Martin Heidegger, the existentialist philosopher who brought Schmitt into the Nazi Party. Strauss corresponded with Schmitt and was influenced by the example that takes a perversion of philosophy into the real political realm in order to excuse a power grab. It was Strauss who taught that philosophy contained inner secrets of interpretation that was taught only to a chosen elite, where the basis of that secret was that lies were permissible to that elite to serve the power needs of that elite.

    Thus 9/11 was the emergency used by, and created by, the Neoconservatives, for the rise to power utilizing 'Emergency Powers' for a dictatorship that would wage perpetual war, based on lies, to stay in power.

    Essays in this collection by LaRouchePac, 'The Children of Satan" goes into further detail on this, including the destruction of culture by the allied forces of these elites that run the 'entertainment industries' in part III of the Children of Satan. on the 'Congress for Cultural Freedom' project more properly referred to as in the publication as 'The Sexual Congress for Cultural Fascism"

    https://archive.larouchepac.com/files/child_satan_book_0.pdf

    Thus 9/11 was the emergency used by, and created by, the Neoconservatives, for the rise to power utilizing ‘Emergency Powers’ for a dictatorship that would wage perpetual war, based on lies, to stay in power.

    Exactly right – but it failed (on the domestic US side) and we are living in the messy aftermath. The Neocons planned to hold absolute power after 9/11.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Okechukwu

    Then you’re either not paying attention or in denial. For example, movies about black and white race relations almost always depict the whites as moral reprobates and just plain wrong while blacks are holier than thou, right and righteous. Rosewood, A Time to Kill , Selma, and Higher Learning are just a small sampling.
     
    These are historical films. How are you going to treat these periods without depicting white moral reprobates?

    The only good whites are those who don’t take their own side and help blacks
     
    There are only two choices in most films: good and evil. What you describe as not taking their own side is Hollywood trying to introduce good whites to counterbalance the evil ones, lest people go away thinking that all whites are evil. You cannot treat the klan or neo-nazis sympathetically. If that's what you want you might want to fly off to another planet.

    Django Unchained is a pure anti-white snuff film.
     
    It's a shame more of that didn't happen in real life. Nat Turner and John Brown were heroes. Interesting that you have nothing to say about the underlying slavery and brutality that motivated Django. The suffering of whites at the hands of Djando was a walk in the park compared to the real suffering of blacks.

    Hidden Figures was fabricated history about how black women wuz queens of the space program and showed those cracka ass white men a thing or two about advanced math.
     
    I'd rather take to word of the Smithsonian over a racist troll like you.

    The True Story of “Hidden Figures,” the Forgotten Black Women Who Helped Win the Space Race

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/forgotten-black-women-mathematicians-who-helped-win-wars-and-send-astronauts-space-180960393/


    More like Jewish men and Jews don’t consider themselves as white Europeans and from a genetic standpoint they clearly are not white European. With all the pro-black crap emanating from Hollywood these days Jewish Hollywood has taken sides and it isn’t with whites.
     
    Like virtually all white nationalists you are not in touch with reality whatsoever.

    You cannot treat the klan or neo-nazis sympathetically. If that’s what you want you might want to fly off to another planet.

    Then you can’t treat the Black Panthers, the Bloods, the Crips, the NOI or BLM sympathetically either. If that’s what you want then get a one way ticket to your ancestral Africa.

    It’s a shame more of that didn’t happen in real life. Nat Turner and John Brown were heroes.

    It’s also a shame that African blacks were brought to this continent or that after the civil war they weren’t eliminated outright or repatriated back to Africa. President Lincoln was assassinated before he could effect the latter. Poor whites suffered greatly, too, and slavery impoverished them since it’s impossible to compete with slave labor.

    Just to be fair (((Hollywood))) should make a movie based on The Turner Diaries to foster and raise white racial consciousness and depict ALL blacks as mortal enemies deserving of the ultimate punishment. I’m sure you’d be fine with that.

    I’d rather take to word of the Smithsonian over a racist troll like you.

    Not sure if suffer from severe presbyopia , but the two photos of the negress math wizards clearly show them as light skinned blacks or almost white (in the case of Katherine Johnson) just like the “racist troll” said. I believe those women should be recognized for their efforts, but the Smithsonian can spare us the embellished and politically correct account which turns them into linchpins of the space program. But believe what you must to bolster your fragile self-esteem.

    Like virtually all white nationalists you are not in touch with reality whatsoever.

    You’re beyond hopeless if you think Jews and European whites are one people. That belief betrays your simple mindedness. You remind me of the blacks who think that every oriental they encounter is Chinese not realizing that there are Japanese, Vietnamese, Koreans, Laotian, etc.

    Read More
    • Agree: Che Guava
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    I read the Turner Diaries just last year. Not necessarily great for me , but very entertaining.

    So, some enterprising small-time USA people should just make a film of it. Forget Hellywood, just make it!

    Had a revelation in the last two days, Pahlaniuk's Fight Club is based on the Turner Diaries, just watered down.

    He is so stupid, I have the version of Fight Club where you can switch to listen to Pittt boasting, Norton saying stupid things, the jewish 'Englishwoman' playing very English, and Pahlaniuk just sounding like a moron.

    I am convinced that Fight Club is based on the Turner Diaries, not least because Pahlaniuk is audibly a cretin.

    Have never read a Pahlaniuk story, tried at times at bookshops, too boring, but have read Turner Diaries and seen Fight Club,

    So the latter is based on the former.

    Anybody wanting to make a movie of the Turner Diaries would find many willing people,
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Okechukwu

    Then you’re either not paying attention or in denial. For example, movies about black and white race relations almost always depict the whites as moral reprobates and just plain wrong while blacks are holier than thou, right and righteous. Rosewood, A Time to Kill , Selma, and Higher Learning are just a small sampling.
     
    These are historical films. How are you going to treat these periods without depicting white moral reprobates?

    The only good whites are those who don’t take their own side and help blacks
     
    There are only two choices in most films: good and evil. What you describe as not taking their own side is Hollywood trying to introduce good whites to counterbalance the evil ones, lest people go away thinking that all whites are evil. You cannot treat the klan or neo-nazis sympathetically. If that's what you want you might want to fly off to another planet.

    Django Unchained is a pure anti-white snuff film.
     
    It's a shame more of that didn't happen in real life. Nat Turner and John Brown were heroes. Interesting that you have nothing to say about the underlying slavery and brutality that motivated Django. The suffering of whites at the hands of Djando was a walk in the park compared to the real suffering of blacks.

    Hidden Figures was fabricated history about how black women wuz queens of the space program and showed those cracka ass white men a thing or two about advanced math.
     
    I'd rather take to word of the Smithsonian over a racist troll like you.

    The True Story of “Hidden Figures,” the Forgotten Black Women Who Helped Win the Space Race

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/forgotten-black-women-mathematicians-who-helped-win-wars-and-send-astronauts-space-180960393/


    More like Jewish men and Jews don’t consider themselves as white Europeans and from a genetic standpoint they clearly are not white European. With all the pro-black crap emanating from Hollywood these days Jewish Hollywood has taken sides and it isn’t with whites.
     
    Like virtually all white nationalists you are not in touch with reality whatsoever.

    These are historical films. How are you going to treat these periods without depicting white moral reprobates?

    Whites who retaliated against blacks for depredations they committed against the white community or who take their own side in racial conflict are not moral reprobates. Using your logic any blacks who riot or attack and/or kill police or white citizens for largely imaginary wrongs are moral reprobates.

    Only Rosewood and Selma are based on actual historical events and they only tell the story from the malcontented negro point of view. In doing so they willfully left out facts which would cast blacks as less than the morally pure and righteous beings they are depicted as and that would put white attitudes and actions and the dynamic from that time into its proper context.

    There are only two choices in most films: good and evil.

    Assuming the films are works of fiction which offers greater latitude. In non-fiction there’s usually shades of gray and two sides that (((Hollywood))) often leaves out since they deal in anti-white propaganda, not genuine history, when it concerns the history of black and white race relations.

    What you describe as not taking their own side is Hollywood trying to introduce good whites to counterbalance the evil ones, lest people go away thinking that all whites are evil.

    If that’s the way you see things then what movies depict blacks as evil and their fellow blacks turning against their own race and aiding and abetting whites? Answer: none, because the “white men”
    of (((Hollywood))) aim to raise black racial consciousness, foster black racial identity and instill an “us vs. them (whitey)” attitude in blacks. We need more uncle Tom’s on the silver screen. We need more black movie stars who hate their own race as a condition of their continued employment.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    Holding up the (Jewish) Disney corporation acquisition of (Gentile) George Lucas’s SW property as an example of the same process as the formation of the (Gentile) Christian heritage on the mouldering bones of the Hebraic (Jewish) tradition reads like a sort of Satanic inversion.

    The new STAR WARS or STAR SCHWARZ made things much worse, but Lucas ruined it long long ago. He came up with a great vision but emotionally grew backward and made the Saga about nothing but toys, special effects, and pandering to kids. Despite their faults, STAR WARS and EMPIRE worked as storytelling and set up a great finale. Luke vs Darth. But RETURN OF JEDI was filled with fish-headed generals and jungle teddy bears. Also, Lucas had the tendency to combine naive infantilism with quasi-tendentious sermonizing. So, he said that Ewoks were like the Viet Cong because US, the great industrial power, was defeated by jungle warriors of Vietnam. But this is silly. The battle takes place in a single afternoon in RETURN and just a handful of Ewoks die. In contrast, Vietnam War lasted for 8 yrs(officially and unofficially even longer), and at least 2 million Viets died and many got wounded. Also, the viets were not a hunter-gatherer tribe with stone age weapons but armed and supplied by the OTHER GREAT INDUSTRIAL Power, the Soviets. But Lucas gave us teddy bears in space and then made some bogus pompous political statements, like he is Colonel Kurtz in APOCALYPSE NOW or something. It was funny seeing a man getting sillier and more serious at the same time. And the whole STAR WARS is like that. In some ways, it gets darker and more 'complicated'. We discover Darth is really pa of Luke, and Luke is tempted to the Dark Side. And the prequels say something about how democracy can turn into tyranny. And yet, at the center of the narrative is just a lot of hokum and kiddie stuff. STAR WARS could have been EXCALIBUR IN SPACE but it just became a big pinball machine.

    That STAR WARS got Jewishized into STAR SCHWARZ is interesting given that the core inspiration of the STAR WARS universe is pagan. Even though Lucas drew some ideas from the Bible and Judeo-Christian tradition, it owes more to paganism of Greco-Roman mythology, Germanic mythology, Japanese samurai cult & Kurosawa films, Arthurian legends, the Western, and 20th century Fascist-Nazi aesthetics. It was about the brotherhood of knighthood, the cult of the warrior.
    And of course, STAR SCHWARZ continues in that vein. It still owes more to paganist inspirations than anything in the Bible. And yet, why is it Jewishy? Because there are many aspects to Jewishness. There is core Jewishness of religion and heritage. But there is also the Pawnbroker Jewishness, the art of merchantry where Jews take control of pagan/gentile icons & idols and use/exploit them to serve the Jewish agenda. It's like a Jewish pawnbroker wasn't a collector of only Jewish stuff. He gained ownership of tons of goy, pagan, gentile stuff. He used them for profits or props to push Jewish interests.
    In our world, Jews promote Diversity and Interracism on whites. Diversity weakens white unity and white power. Interracism destroys white male pride, thus whites become cucked. So, even though STAR SCHWARZ is still paganist, those paganist altars have been altered to favor the political and ideological agenda of Jewish Globalist Power. This is also true of homomania. The history of homo cult is paganist. It was biggest among pagan Greeks and decadent Romans. And some pagan tribes were tolerant of homo stuff. Samurai could bugger one another sometimes. In contrast, Jewish history was anti-homo. So, how did Jews, even religious Jews, become such promoters of Homomania? Because this paganism can be used by Jews to weaken gentiles. By promoting Homos as wonderful elites, society normalizes the notion of the minority ruling elite. Also, by weakening the moral core of Christians by making churches adopt homomania, Christians no longer have true moral pride. Any people who worship homo fecal penetration as holy cannot be truly moral. They are degenerates whose moral righteousness depends on hype, hysteria, and propaganda than moral depth or meaning.

    Jews tend to be monomaniacal and seek world dominance, and there have been three ways of going about achieving this. (1) Sticking to Jewish tradition and the Covenant. Keeping strict barriers between holy Jews and filthy goyim. This school of thought said if Jews remain clean and serve God, God will take care of things and favor Jews, and Jews will inherit the earth. (2) Creating a new universal idea(as outgrowth of tribal Jewishness) and spreading that idea to destroy all other ideas. Christianity and Communism were such Jewish ideas. The ideal of Christianity that began as Jewish heresy is to convert the whole world to Jesus and to destroy all other ideas. Paganisms of all kinds must be destroyed. Non-believers are heathens and must be converted or condemned. Communism was a secular kind of Christianity. Supposedly, Marx figured everything out, and only communism was the truth, and all other ideas had to be destroyed or exterminated. The whole world must be made communist. One idea for all mankind.

    The problem of (1) was that extreme tribalism didn't do much for Jews in terms of power. NO matter how pure they were remained in blood and no matter how much they remained faithful to God, Jews didn't inherit the world. As for (2), even though those ideas began as Jewish ideas, gentiles eventually took control of them, and Jews got burned. Christians began to persecute Jews. And communism eventually suppressed Jewish identity. And then, even Jewish communists came to be suspected and marginalized as untrustworthy.

    But there was (3) way. By this way, Jews would accept the existence of pagan/gentile ideas. Jews would accept the poly-ideastic way of the world. Unlike (1) Jews, the (3) Jews would extensively engage with the gentile world. But unlike (2) Jews, they would not try to conquer the world with one idea, like Christianity or Communism. Rather, they would allow various ideas/interests to exist BUT have those ideas/interests serve the Higher and Greater ideas/interests of Jews. It's like the Roman Empire. It allowed non-Romans to keep their cultures and etc. But the Empire also insisted that non-Romans all serve Roman agendas and interests in the end. Instead of universalism where everyone has the same ideas, icons, and idols, it'd be a poly-versal empire where various peoples would stick to their ideas, icons, and idols that, however, would be manipulated to serve the Higher Idea. So, Jews adopted a kind of neo-paganism for their own purposes. In pagan cosmology, there are various gods, but there is also the top god, and the lower gods serve the top god. Jewish manipulation of neo-paganism had non-Jews as lesser gods serving Jews as the top gods. This way, pagans/gentiles could have their own identities and cultures... but they would ultimately bow down to the higher identity and culture of Jews.

    And we see this with how STAR WARS became STAR SCHWARZ. It is still very pagan and steeped in the Carl-Jung-Joseph-Campbell thing, but it now favors feminism, jungle fever, Diversity, and etc to occupy what were essentially roles defined by European pagans. But we see the same thing with BBC. British and European histories are retconned to push the Jewish agenda of Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs with Jungle Fever for white women and cuckery for white men. Hollywood Jews said the next James Bond will be a Negro.
    The great western heroes, Lancelot and Achilles, have been made black in BBC and TV shows. So, even as Jews maintain the pagan idols, they change the cast to push the Jewish agenda of perpetuating white submissivism so that whites will forever lose white pride and identity. A people without pride become mental slaves and serve OTHER peoples.

    https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bXWv5Is_X9Q/WklRiiULqWI/AAAAAAAABzs/0rRGyUooP3QkTDGQdIKAoRbNVGmYgtUmQCLcBGAs/s1600/DSU_1m1X4AECoJE.jpg

    Communism and Christianity(and Islam) were mono-imperial systems. Ideally, all of humanity should come under the One True Idea, and all men must struggle for the exact same principles and goals. Both have roots in Jewish culture because Jews developed the notion of the One God and One Truth, with all other gods deserving to be either holocausted or denied their validity/existence.

    In contrast, there was the poly-imperial systems. It attempted to conquer as many lands and people as possible. But it didn't believe there was one true idea for all. It was more about power and control than conversion. So, other peoples, the conquered subjects, could believe in their own gods, stick with their own traditions/values, and worship their own idols. However, they had to accept the Imperial Rulers as the top power. They had to pay taxes to the top power. They had to bow down to the military might of the top power. Romans were like this,and the Romans managed well with most pagan folks. But they had the most problem with Jews because, unlike pagans, Jews believed their God was the only true God. So, Romans had the stronger military and greater material power, but Jews had the stronger idea, greater spiritual might, and farther-reaching prophetic vision. Romans could win with arms, but Jews could win with vision. But to win, Jews had to develop an idea that could win over the hearts of gentiles/pagans. And that was Christianity. In a way, the spread of Christianity was a great triumph of the Jewish idea over gentiles. But because most Jews didn't take to the new faith and stuck with their own original concept, the Jewish Heresy turned on them. So, Christianity was both the biggest triumph and tragedy for Jews. Communism would turn out similarly. Jews won big and lost big with it.

    So, what is the best way for Jews to win? Self-enclosed tribalism won't get anywhere. Jews must engage with the whole world that is goyim. Should Jews come up with a universal idea for all mankind? But then, gentiles will eventually come to own the idea and use it for their own interests, and this might hurt Jews.
    Given those odds, the best way is for Jews to make peace with gentile ideas, icons, and interests but find some way to make them serve Jewish identity, ideas, and interests as the highest and greatest there is. It's like how Jews work with Evangelicals. Jews are okay with the born-again folks worshiping Jesus and etc, BUT much of Evangelicalism is now 'muh Israel, muh Israel, muh Israel'. Jews work well with Mormons, but Mormons are all about 'muh Israel, muh Israel, muh Israel'. So, Jews are okay with Mormons being Mormons BUT Mormons better still put Jewish interests above Mormon interests. It's like Romans were okay with Syrians and Britons, but those conquered folks still had to obey Roman power before their own. Even as Romans didn't erase other people's cultures and idols, those had to be made subservient to Roman culture and idols as the highest there are.
    And modern Jews adopted this, esp from Anglos, the modern folks who come closest to being like the Romans of old. So, the US is now about diversity and how different folks can have their own cultures, identities, and narratives... BUT they better put 'muh Israel' before anything. Jews don't have to attend meetings for Russian, Iranian, Chinese, Mexican, African, etc interests BUT all gentile politicians have to attend AIPAC to praise 'muh Israel'. Look at that whore Nikki Haley, the semi-person-of-dot.

    The COEN movie HAIL CAESAR offers a useful glimpse into this Jewish agenda. Like some other Coen movies, it is pretty mocking of Christianity as a religion that controls the goyim. Even though goyim have used Christianity to oppress Jews, it also tames goyim and turns them into saps who can be manipulated by Jews.
    Some people think Coens are respectful of Christianity. They are not. What they are interested in is the psycho-politics of Christianity, and in this, they share something with Steven Spielberg who has adopted Catholicist and Evangelical tropes to push his vision of Pop Jewishism on the world.

    In a scene in HAIL CAESAR we see a Rabbi who is offended by what Christian clergy has to say. Even though Jews have been anti-Christian, there's a kind of paradox. Jews have been so anti-Christian because they are so Christoid, conviction that Jewish individuals could become like Christ. The main problem that Jews have with Christianity is it deified the prophet and messiah into Son of God or even God. The Jewish idea of the Messiah was a great prophet, warrior, messenger. Jews never conceived of messiah as God or even Son of God. Jewish concept of the messiah is empowering because the messiah is a prophet, and a man can be a prophet. So, by the Jewish concept of the messiah, any Jewish man can, at least theoretically, be a messiah since he could be the great prophet. In contrast, Christianity says the messiah is not a prophet but the Son of God or God Himself. And that means there is no more Future. The Truth has been revealed through Jesus the Son of God, and humanity has no more need for prophets. After Jesus, there can only be saints. Saints are different from prophets. Saints don't have the great vision. They just have the pure faith in God and Jesus. Their duty is to be angelic and devoted. They are not seers of the Future since the Truth has already been revealed. Thus, Christianity destroyed the prophetic tradition. It allowed for many saints but no prophets. In contrast, Jews never gave up on the notion of the prophet. Since the messiah has yet to come and since a man can be a prophet and since a prophet can be the messiah, any Jewish man can, at least theoretically, be the prophet-messiah.

    In some ways, Christianity is more hubristic than Judaism, but in some ways, it is more humble. It is more hubristic in the notion that a Man who walks on Earth can be the Son of God, even God. To Jews, this was pure blasphemy, an affront to God.
    And yet, precisely because Jesus wasn't just a great prophet but Son of God or God as the Messiah, no other man can ever come anywhere near Him or be like Him. He is the ONLY Man who could be the Messiah since Christianity says Messiah = Son of God = God.

    In contrast, Judaism can be said to be more humble because it says no man can be the Son of God or God. God is too great and doesn't manifest Himself in human form. And yet, because the Jewish concept of the Messiah is a prophet, any Jew could conceivably be him. Granted, the Messiah could be like an angel sent from Heaven. Even so, he is still not Son of God or God. He is still closer to man if not a man. Since Jews defined the Messiah in this manner, each Jew is instilled with propheticism which is far more ambitious and egoistic than sainthood, which is about devotion and faith. A prophet is humble before God but confident of his vision as the messenger of God. In contrast, a saint is not about the power of mind and vision but goodness of the heart and faith. It's a bit sappy.

    In the conference with rabbi and Christian clergy in HAIL CAESAR, the rabbi says God cannot be shown in Jewish culture. And in the movie, we are not shown the face of Jesus in the movie-within-the-movie. But we see a lot of the Roman soldier. And we see the shabbos goy gentile studio boss, but we are never shown his Jewish boss Schenk who is like a godly presence. Both the Roman soldier(George Clooney) and the goy studio boss have two modes of behavior: soldier and saint. As soldier, he is rough and aggressive. But when faced with the greater prophetic power of Jesus, he goes into saint mode with sappy face. And the goy studio boss is the same way. He can be tough and push actors around. He whips the crew to get the job done. He is warrior-like in that mode. But he is deeply respectful to his boss Schenk who is like a divine prophet to him.(Schenk is like the Jewish prophet of capitalism; Marcuse is like Jewish prophet of communism; Hollywood is divided between two modes.) Schenk apparently has the vision whereas his shabbos goy underling can manage things but lacks the big vision. After all, Jews invented Hollywood, the empire of dreams where gentile-pagan idols and icons came to be reshaped to serve the Jewish Empire.

    HAIL CAESAR is a rather confused movie because its allusions are often double-or-triple-in-meaning. There is Scarlett Johansson as Rhinemaiden of Wagner's mythology. But she is swallowed up by what? Whale that swallowed Jonah? This Jewish whale also swallows the gold and then its blowhole ejaculates like Harvey Weinstein's pud. But later, this woman is like a perverse allusion to the Madonna. She is pregnant with a child from a uncertain father and she ends up marrying a guy named Joe, like Mary was married to Joseph. So,a character is alluded to both Germanic mythology and the Biblical story. Weird. And later a Soviet submarine emerges like the whale. I guess Sovietism is like the other Jewish creation. Whale of communism vs Whale of capitalism, both trying to devour the wealth of the world as a good or an evil. But the guy loses the money in the water cuz of the dog(like the dog that messed up the heist in THE KILLING by Kubrick). It's a very confused movie, but also a very inspired and interesting one. I can understand why it flopped at the box office. Though a comedy, there's a lot more going on there which is esoteric.

    Anyway, the movie is onto something. We tend to see history in terms of Jews vs Christianity but it's more like Future Christoidism vs Been-there-done-there-Christianism.
    Christianity says the Christ was among us, and He was Son of God, thus God, and we all need to be saints with sappy faces like when George Clooney looks at Jesus who offers him water.
    In contrast, Jews believe the Future is filled with new christoids with prophetic vision. Jews accept Jesus as prophet but not messiah. So, Christ was only a prophet, and that means there can be future christs or christoids... like Marx, Rand, Marcuse, etc. And the 20th century has been filled with Jewish prophets and would-be prophets. And this has been a source of great power for Jews. In the end, the stronger idea gains dominance over weaker ones. And the fact is the prophet is more powerful than the saint. Saint is a pawn on the chess board whereas the prophet is the rook or queen. Saint blindly and sappily serves and obeys the king. The queen and rook serve the king too but have their own agency and greater reach in movement.

    Because Jews are still in prophetic mode whereas Christians are in saint mode, the globalist empire has the weaker saintly ideas of gentiles serving the stronger prophetic ideas of Jews.

    You seem bound and determined to prove out the value of the latter half of Chesterton’s observation that “the whole truth is generally the ally of virtue; a half-truth is always the ally of some vice.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    From the days of McCarthy and the outing of various infiltrators in Hollywood and other media we can see that there's always been this intention to use mass media as a vehicle for propaganda. Now they've gotten fairly bold and actually announce their intentions with little fear since they've now got a substantial part of the population on their side. Early media reports gave this movie glowing praise so as to hype sales. Reality apparently has set in as word of mouth travels. Almost all media is unwatchable, they slip propaganda in into almost anything and everything. I dropped out many years ago and won't support them slapping me in the face. I've got too much self-respect to play along with any of this and suggest everyone do likewise. Let them get their money from someone else.

    Right on. Why does anyone suffer this crap that is pop culture?
    I live in Philly and am surrounded by history.
    From Franklin to Coltrane l walk in some Giant Steps…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    In a way, the New STAR WARS Makes Perfect Sense Given the Change in Ownership from George Lucas to Disney. Force reflects real power.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAtV2KTeR0o

    Richard Spencer in the video above complains about how the New STAR WARS doesn't respect or conform to the original vision created by George Lucas. And many others have lodged similar complaints. Across the political spectrum, many are not pleased with the new series and especially the new movie because it deviates from the original vision that they grew up with. Many adult audience members spent their formative yrs watching the original series, the first three released from 1977 to 1983 and the second trilogy from 1999 to 2005. So, they have a fixed idea of what STAR WARS universe and the Force are about. Therefore, when confronted with the revisions and narrative-thematic purging of the New Series, they are bewildered and even exasperated by Disney's lack of 'respect' for Lucas' original vision. (But do they ever ask why Lucas still deserves respect when he sold his baby to Disney for billions of shekels?)

    Now, the complainers have a point. The new series may well indeed violate the core principles of Lucas' original vision. It may go against the spirit of the original incarnation under Lucas' command. But they are overlooking certain key facts about the Way of Power in culture. What goes for Power goes for the Force. The Force in STAR WARS is whatever those with the possession of copyright say it is. The Force was what it was as long as Lucas had control over it. But with Jews at Disney now owning STAR WARS, the Force is whatever THEY make it out to be. It's as Carl Schmitt said of the nature of law and power. No law exists outside the reality of power. Basic laws are vaguely worded, and it is the Power that decides the meaning and force of those words. So, when Jews gained control of US culture and jurisprudence, the Constitution came to mean Open Borders, Diversity, Anti-White Dogma(to enforce white submissivism necessary to serve Jewish dominance), and 'Gay Marriage'. Americanism and Constitutionalism were always shaped and determined by the Power. After all, what is Free Speech? Jews once used to say Free Speech means all speech, from far right to far left, should be free.Back then, Jews feared censorship of Jewish radicalism and pornography(big profits for Jews) by traditional Christian power. But once Jews gained supreme power in the US, they came to fear Free Speech as criticism of Jewish Power. Therefore, Jews redefined Free Speech as excluding 'hate speech'. Since Jewish Power controls the meaning of 'hate speech', Zionist speech(that demeans Palestinians) is not 'hate speech', but BDS speech that calls for justice for Palestinians must be criminalized as 'hate'. The Power decides what is 'hate', and that means Jewish elites with supreme power in the US get to denounce and suppress certain speech as 'hateful'.

    What goes for Reality goes for Fantasy. The rules of fantasy will always be controlled by those with power over the fantasy. So, it doesn't matter what Lucas did with the original STAR WARS. It doesn't matter how the Force was manifested in the first six movies. The fact is the power of the Force has gone over to Jews at Disney, and that means Jews will alter the Force to suit their agendas and biases. It's simple as that. So, when Richard Spencer and others talk of STAR WARS as a universe existing independent of copyright ownership and moneyed control, they are being naive. They are presuming that there really is a Core Canonical Principles of the STAR WARS and the dynamics of the Force. No, such was all make-believe and can easily be altered based on whomever is now in control.
    Spencer has emphasized over and over how it's foolish to believe in Constitutionalism as a principle independent of power. He has castigated the so-called True Conservatives who claim to stand for abstract American Values of Liberty and Individualism. His point is that American Constitutionalism will always be determined by those with real power. The Constitution can be molded to mean just about anything. At one time, it even justified slavery and the ethnic cleansing of American Indians. And the 'internment' of the Japanese. And censorship of obscene material offensive to Christians. The Constitution allowed all such censorship and restrictions in the past because the White Christian Majority could will the Constitution to support and defend certain values and interests. But once Jews gained control of the Constitution, the US came to be all about ISRAEL FIRST, favoring Zionists over all other peoples(esp the Palestinians), Open Borders Immigration to turn whites into a minority, and etc. The Constitution now serves the interests of Zionist-Supremacism. And since Jews have chosen Homomania as the proxy agent of Jewish Globlaism, the Worship of Homos and Trannies has become the new christianity or Queertianity. The Christian Church is like the Constitution. In the end, it will be what those in power say it's about. The Power decides and molds & twists the presumed core principles to its will.

    If Spencer is so perceptive about the relation between Power and Laws, why is he so naive and earnest in his assessment of the new STAR WARS movie? He seems baffled as to why the new series violated and betrayed what STAR WARS is really supposed to be about. But his idea of 'real Star Wars' only applies to the franchise that was owned by Lucas. As long as Lucas had power over his baby, he could do as he pleased. But when he sold the Force to Disney, Jews had the power over the Force, and they could bend it to serve their own biases and agendas. It's like if you give your kid up for adoption, the adoptive parents can do whatever they want to with it. Jews can adopt a non-Jew and raise it as a Jew. And of course, the new STAR WARS reflects this reality. What are the agendas of Jewish globalists? It is white feminism. Jews use feminism or man-hate to drive a wedge between white men and white women. By thus setting white women against white men, white race is weakened, and it is easier for Jews to maintain control over white goyim. Jews also push race-mixing to destroy racial and ethnic identities. A people with confused identities are less likely to unite and rise up against the ruling elites. It is also a way to demoralize white males and destroy their pride. By especially promoting interracism between black males and white females, Jews send a message that black males are superior studs while white males are either dorky cucks or wussy homos. And the new STAR WARS is geared to turning its white heroine into a race-mixer. We see this all around in TV commercials, TV shows, and movies. Jews want to make the next James Bond black. Jews want to put the black male on the pedestal as the top alpha male who deserves to take white women. As for white males, they are either old farts who should die or dorky cucks who should delight in their own defeat and humiliation.

    Jews also push for massive 'immigration' to increase Diversity. Why do Jews do this? Jewish elites fear a homogeneous population that might unite against Jewish power. So, Jews seek to increase Diversity and set various goyim against one another. That way, the goyim won't be able to unite as one people against Jewish elites. And of course, the new STAR WARS is all about Diversity, a weapon of Jews against native populations of any nation. Meanwhile, virtually all the villains are white, especially white males.

    In the end, the Power decides the meaning of anything. This was true of how Christianity got started. It developed as a branch or heresy of Judaism. Jews denounced Christianity as a violation of the true meaning of God in the Torah and Jewish tradition. How dare these gentiles take something from Jews and change the meanings to make God serve gentiles than Jews? According to the original spirit of the Torah, God cannot be manifest in human form. And God's Covenant is with Jews, not with all of humanity. But Christianity had Jesus as Son of God, a human figure walking among mankind. And Christianity said the new covenant is with all of humanity. In the end, it didn't matter how much Jews protested. The fact is when the idea of God passed over to Christian and later Muslim gentiles, they changed or twisted the principles to serve their own interests and agendas. Jewish concept of God was limited only to spaces in which Jews had the power. In gentile spaces where Christians and Muslims had control over the idea of God, His meaning and design could be altered, even drastically, to serve interests inimical to Jews.

    So, what happened to STAR WARS isn't much different from what happened to the concept of the Jewish God once its ownership passed over to gentiles. Via Christian conversion, many gentiles became believers in God, and this belief gave them ownership of the meaning of God. And in their self-interest, they altered and violated many principles so dear to Jews who had once held sole ownership of their God.
    Likewise, STAR WARS owned by Lucas and beloved by so many people had canonical value only as long as its ownership remained with those who remained loyal to the original vision. But once the ownership changed hands, the New Masters were bound to make the franchise serve their own biases and interests.
    This happens with every newspaper or magazine. It doesn't matter what its original masthead declaration of principles was. The new owners will bend the purpose to their own will. This is why The New Republic changed drastically when it was taken over by Neocons under the tutelage of Martin Peretz. And then, once ownership changed once more, it turned into just some homo-globalist hipster rag. Or consider Huffington Post. Despite its name, Ariana Huffington has nothing to do with the new incarnation, and it's changed considerably from what it had been under her control.

    If Alt Right has gained ownership of STARS WARS franchise, they would have made it serve its vision and interests. Richard Spencer as producer-director of STAR WARS would have made the Empire the good guys, and of course, many fans would have screamed Bloody Murder in protest. It's like Stanley Kubrick did his OWN thing with THE SHINING to the never-ending ire of Stephen King who felt Kubrick betrayed his core concept and meaning. But as King had sold movie rights to Kubrick, he was helpless to stop it.
    Indeed, if there is such a thing as Alt Right STAR WARS fanfiction, the narratives likely serve the biases of White Nationalism. But since Jews of Disney own STAR WARS, the franchise is now used to further the Jewish Supremacist agenda of globalism.

    Same thing happened with dialectical communism. The original theory by Karl Marx prophesied that conditions would worsen to the point where the working class would rise up to overthrow the bourgeoisie. Since the Proletariat was essential to this revolution, only an industrialized nation with a majority prole population could undergo the great tranformation. But when Lenin and Stalin took control of the theory, it was altered so that even a backward semi-industrial nation like Russia could have a communist revolution. Spontaneous uprising by the working class was no longer necessary. A radical vanguard with the support of secret police apparatus could pull it off. Later, Mao altered the meaning of Marxism even more by arguing that a communist revolution could happen with a peasant army. So, despite the original canonical meaning of Marxist theory, in the real world of actual practice, Marxism could be molded to be anything by the powers-that-be. If Maoism said Marxism could prevail in an agricultural society, that was the official lore of the land.And later, when reformers took control of China, communism could mean market economics. So, even as the Chinese Communist Party maintained the symbolism of Mao, the Red Flag, and revolutionary pageantry, the New Way was about buying-and-selling, trade with capitalist powers, and getting rich. Indeed, consider how Che Guevara became linked with capitalist pop culture and hedonism even though he hated Rock music, hippies, and materialism.

    So, if we apply Carl-Schmitt-ian analysis to the new STAR WARS, no one should be surprised that the new owners of the Force changed the meaning to suit their ethno-socio-economic purposes. No school of laws, no work of culture, and no set of principles exist in some pure form in a vacuum. They always exist in a world of people with competing interests and agendas. Indeed, even among Christians, different sects disagree on the meaning of Jesus. In many denominations today, homomaniacs have taken over and insist that the faith is about worshiping homos and trannies. And warmongering patriots believe that Christianity is about the flag and guns. So, expecting the STAR WARS universe to remain pristine or resist heretical ideas is wishful thinking. STAR WARS will be whatever those with ownership of it make it to be.
    It's like the Hagia Sophia Mosque in Istanbul. It was originally built as a Christian Cathedral, but Muslims altered the meaning. At one time, Ottoman Turks even altered the Parthenon to serve as a place of prayer for Muslims. But then, Christians had done the same to Pagan Temples. While Christians destroyed some pagan temples, they altered some to serve Jesus than the pagan gods. If we see STAR WARS as a kind of pop mythology or fanboy church, its core meaning will change to the tune of whoever has control over it. Consider the evolution of the Parthenon depending on who held power over Athens.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGitmYl6U90

    Another complaint oft-heard from the detractors of the new series is that the nature of the Force has change considerably from the original series. They object to how the Force has become so easy with the young heroine. And Spencer wonders how someone with such humble background could have the Force. But, they are forgetting that George Lucas himself kept changing the nature of the Force. In PHANTOM MENACE, he altered the Force from some mysterious essence to something that can be medically detected in blood. And for those who have problems with the young heroine's humble background in the new series, the old series would have us believe that some slave woman could give a miracle virgin birth to some kid who, at the tender age of 7, can win a hyper-drive chariot race and man spaceships and blow up seasoned enemy pilots. So, if a 7 yr old squirt can do all that, is it really so strange to see a young heroine do 'badass' things?

    Also, if a female slave non-entity(in PHANTOM MENACE) could give a miracle birth to some kid with the Force, why is it so surprising that the heroine in the new series could have super-Force despite being born to humble parents? Besides, if the 20th century taught us anything, it was that those from the humblest backgrounds could become giants of history: Stalin, Hitler, Mao, etc.

    As for the heroine's ease with mastering the Force, we need to understand that pop culture reflects the times. When Lucas made STAR WARS, power was still institutionalized. One had to go through the proper institutions/channels or gain access to big industries to be somebody. To be an influential journalist, one had to gain position at CBS or New York Times. To be an influential thinker, one had to have a position at Harvard or be promoted by top publishing companies and the media. To be a famous cultural celebrity, one had to be hired by TV, Hollywood, radio, or music industry. Even though there were alternative venues and underground artists, it was a tough climb to gain any kind of success, at least immediately. And Lucas struggled in this world. For him to gain access to film technology, he had to work hard and long and make the climb. To gain the Force, one had to go through the institutions controlled by high priests.

    But we now live in the internet age. Even a young person in a small town now has access to more news and information than New York Times did in the pre-internet age. When Lucas grew up, it was difficult to see foreign films. Only college towns and big cities showed them, and one had to wait long time to see certain movies. It was nearly impossible for anyone to see something when he wanted.
    Today, even someone living in the boonies can watch all sorts of movies from all parts of the world on the internet. Even a kid has more access to World Cinema than top film scholars did prior to the internet age.
    Also, even kids carry around smartphones that serve not only as phones but as internet screens, cameras, recording devices, and etc. It's like their light sabers.
    Thus, the Force has gone from institutional and individual in our world. Before the internet, someone like PewDiePie and Stefan Molyneux didn't have a chance at celebrity-hood. Institutions would not have given them the platform to express their views or pull their antics. But internet has been the great equalizer. Anyone can reach the world from inside their bedrooms. Some of these 'amateurs' have more fans and viewership than mainstream media do.
    So, the revision of the Force in the new series could very well reflect social change. Young people with interesting ideas, music, opinions, personalities, or shtick no longer have to make the Long March through the Institutions to say their say, gain a fanbase, develop a cult, and even become fabulously rich. Even demented Andrew Anglin has gained legendary anti-hero status because of the internet. Even with the attempts to shut down Daily Stormer, Anglin still has enough Troll Force to mess with the Narrative.

    Alt Right should know this since its rise owes so much to the internet, the great equalizer that has made it possible for oddballs like Mark Dice and Styxhexenhammer666 to get huge followings. This is why Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, and Google-Search are working in tandem with ADL to rig the game and ban certain voices deemed 'hateful', but the nature of the internet favors individuals over institutions. It has democratized the Force, for good or for ill.

    So, given all these changes and developments in society, is it any wonder that the nature of the Force has changed in the new series? Whereas Luke had to go through the institutions to gain his power, Rey doesn't. The Force has been digitalized and democratized.

    Internet and gadgets like smartphones have empowered individuals in ways that were unforeseeable when Lucas conceived STAR WARS. Just consider how the rise of high-tech allowed young ones to become overnight moguls and billionaires. Prior to the internet, could someone like Mark Zuckerberg become so rich so fast?

    Now, I'm not saying LAST JEDI is a good movie. I haven't seen it. I did see FORCE AWAKENS, and it was terrible. But, we should not be surprised that Force will change along with the change in ownership and will reflect social transformations all around us. In the end, most pop culture, even when set in the distant past or fantasy world, are more reflections of prevailing fashions and trends of the moment than works of purity remaining faithful to a set of core principles inside a bubble.

    Internet made even this young woman a celebrity and a known factor in culture:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGEilqBNKwk

    Power decides the meaning of anything. This was true of how Christianity got started. It developed as a branch or heresy of Judaism. Jews denounced Christianity as a violation of the true meaning of God in the Torah and Jewish tradition. How dare these gentiles take something from Jews and change the meanings to make God serve gentiles than Jews?

    You are misleading the readers in order to put an extra veneer of authority on your otherwise thoughtful analysis regarding the Nazi jurist Schmitt’s conceptualization of Power.

    Peter, Paul, Matthew, John and most of the other disciples and converts to Christianity were in fact Hebrews.
    Paul -himself a Pharisee- was educated by one of the most learned of rabbis- Gamaliel.

    Jews denounced Christianity as a violation of the true meaning of God in the Torah and Jewish tradition

    None other than Jesus Christ rebuked the scribes and Pharisees!

    “You make the scriptures (Torah) of no account by your traditions of men.”

    The problem with Gods chosen people is that they epitomize the fallen nature of man. A proud and stiff- necked people given over to greed and fornication and idolatry. They gleefully slaughtered the prophets who predicted their impending doom and subsequent enslavement (Judgement from God) under the Babylonians.

    Thus began the scriptural departure from revealed religion to that of the Talmud Bavli- the wise traditions of thousands of rabbis that expounds broadly on non- Biblical topics.

    The Holy Spirit inspired the apostle Paul to admonished the Romans:

    Her eyes (Israel ) have been darkened…

    11 I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy.

    There is the Torah ( Old Covenant) and the New Covenant. One concise theme runs through this received manual of salvation (Gods revelation.. or free gift of Grace to all mankind)

    The blood sacrifice for sin. Jesus Christ.

    Not written in ink, nor chiseled in tablets of stone; but inscribed on the fleshy tables of the heart.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @KenH

    Whites are not being portrayed negatively. White nationalists are wracked by a great many delusions and that’s one of them.
     
    Then you're either not paying attention or in denial. For example, movies about black and white race relations almost always depict the whites as moral reprobates and just plain wrong while blacks are holier than thou, right and righteous. Rosewood, A Time to Kill , Selma, and Higher Learning are just a small sampling. The only good whites are those who don't take their own side and help blacks. Blacks invariably triumph over the dastardly whites.

    Django Unchained is a pure anti-white snuff film. Hidden Figures was fabricated history about how black women wuz queens of the space program and showed those cracka ass white men a thing or two about advanced math. In reality they played a very minor, almost inconsequential role and some of them were so light skinned they could almost pass as white.


    But those portrayals are conceived, written, produced and executed by white men.
     
    More like Jewish men and Jews don't consider themselves as white Europeans and from a genetic standpoint they clearly are not white European. With all the pro-black crap emanating from Hollywood these days Jewish Hollywood has taken sides and it isn't with whites.

    Then you’re either not paying attention or in denial. For example, movies about black and white race relations almost always depict the whites as moral reprobates and just plain wrong while blacks are holier than thou, right and righteous. Rosewood, A Time to Kill , Selma, and Higher Learning are just a small sampling.

    These are historical films. How are you going to treat these periods without depicting white moral reprobates?

    The only good whites are those who don’t take their own side and help blacks

    There are only two choices in most films: good and evil. What you describe as not taking their own side is Hollywood trying to introduce good whites to counterbalance the evil ones, lest people go away thinking that all whites are evil. You cannot treat the klan or neo-nazis sympathetically. If that’s what you want you might want to fly off to another planet.

    Django Unchained is a pure anti-white snuff film.

    It’s a shame more of that didn’t happen in real life. Nat Turner and John Brown were heroes. Interesting that you have nothing to say about the underlying slavery and brutality that motivated Django. The suffering of whites at the hands of Djando was a walk in the park compared to the real suffering of blacks.

    Hidden Figures was fabricated history about how black women wuz queens of the space program and showed those cracka ass white men a thing or two about advanced math.

    I’d rather take to word of the Smithsonian over a racist troll like you.

    The True Story of “Hidden Figures,” the Forgotten Black Women Who Helped Win the Space Race

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/forgotten-black-women-mathematicians-who-helped-win-wars-and-send-astronauts-space-180960393/

    More like Jewish men and Jews don’t consider themselves as white Europeans and from a genetic standpoint they clearly are not white European. With all the pro-black crap emanating from Hollywood these days Jewish Hollywood has taken sides and it isn’t with whites.

    Like virtually all white nationalists you are not in touch with reality whatsoever.

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH

    These are historical films. How are you going to treat these periods without depicting white moral reprobates?
     
    Whites who retaliated against blacks for depredations they committed against the white community or who take their own side in racial conflict are not moral reprobates. Using your logic any blacks who riot or attack and/or kill police or white citizens for largely imaginary wrongs are moral reprobates.

    Only Rosewood and Selma are based on actual historical events and they only tell the story from the malcontented negro point of view. In doing so they willfully left out facts which would cast blacks as less than the morally pure and righteous beings they are depicted as and that would put white attitudes and actions and the dynamic from that time into its proper context.

    There are only two choices in most films: good and evil.
     
    Assuming the films are works of fiction which offers greater latitude. In non-fiction there’s usually shades of gray and two sides that (((Hollywood))) often leaves out since they deal in anti-white propaganda, not genuine history, when it concerns the history of black and white race relations.

    What you describe as not taking their own side is Hollywood trying to introduce good whites to counterbalance the evil ones, lest people go away thinking that all whites are evil.
     
    If that’s the way you see things then what movies depict blacks as evil and their fellow blacks turning against their own race and aiding and abetting whites? Answer: none, because the “white men”
    of (((Hollywood))) aim to raise black racial consciousness, foster black racial identity and instill an “us vs. them (whitey)” attitude in blacks. We need more uncle Tom’s on the silver screen. We need more black movie stars who hate their own race as a condition of their continued employment.
    , @KenH

    You cannot treat the klan or neo-nazis sympathetically. If that’s what you want you might want to fly off to another planet.
     
    Then you can’t treat the Black Panthers, the Bloods, the Crips, the NOI or BLM sympathetically either. If that’s what you want then get a one way ticket to your ancestral Africa.

    It’s a shame more of that didn’t happen in real life. Nat Turner and John Brown were heroes.
     
    It’s also a shame that African blacks were brought to this continent or that after the civil war they weren’t eliminated outright or repatriated back to Africa. President Lincoln was assassinated before he could effect the latter. Poor whites suffered greatly, too, and slavery impoverished them since it’s impossible to compete with slave labor.

    Just to be fair (((Hollywood))) should make a movie based on The Turner Diaries to foster and raise white racial consciousness and depict ALL blacks as mortal enemies deserving of the ultimate punishment. I’m sure you’d be fine with that.

    I’d rather take to word of the Smithsonian over a racist troll like you.
     
    Not sure if suffer from severe presbyopia , but the two photos of the negress math wizards clearly show them as light skinned blacks or almost white (in the case of Katherine Johnson) just like the “racist troll” said. I believe those women should be recognized for their efforts, but the Smithsonian can spare us the embellished and politically correct account which turns them into linchpins of the space program. But believe what you must to bolster your fragile self-esteem.

    Like virtually all white nationalists you are not in touch with reality whatsoever.
     
    You’re beyond hopeless if you think Jews and European whites are one people. That belief betrays your simple mindedness. You remind me of the blacks who think that every oriental they encounter is Chinese not realizing that there are Japanese, Vietnamese, Koreans, Laotian, etc.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @KenH

    Whites are not being portrayed negatively. White nationalists are wracked by a great many delusions and that’s one of them.
     
    Then you're either not paying attention or in denial. For example, movies about black and white race relations almost always depict the whites as moral reprobates and just plain wrong while blacks are holier than thou, right and righteous. Rosewood, A Time to Kill , Selma, and Higher Learning are just a small sampling. The only good whites are those who don't take their own side and help blacks. Blacks invariably triumph over the dastardly whites.

    Django Unchained is a pure anti-white snuff film. Hidden Figures was fabricated history about how black women wuz queens of the space program and showed those cracka ass white men a thing or two about advanced math. In reality they played a very minor, almost inconsequential role and some of them were so light skinned they could almost pass as white.


    But those portrayals are conceived, written, produced and executed by white men.
     
    More like Jewish men and Jews don't consider themselves as white Europeans and from a genetic standpoint they clearly are not white European. With all the pro-black crap emanating from Hollywood these days Jewish Hollywood has taken sides and it isn't with whites.

    Set and match. :)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    Didn't Morgan Freeman complain that he couldn't get roles as the villain because Hollywood won't show blacks in a negative light? Didn't he want to play the role of Hannibal Lecter?

    I didn’t watch this movie, but:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    "Whites are not being portrayed negatively."

    Is that why nearly all the bad guys are white? And didn't one of the writers of The Force Awakens claim that the First Order are "white supremacists"? It doesn't seem hard to draw that conclusion based on the evidence.

    Didn’t Morgan Freeman complain that he couldn’t get roles as the villain because Hollywood won’t show blacks in a negative light? Didn’t he want to play the role of Hannibal Lecter?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    I didn't watch this movie, but:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OKHAzr-riQ
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Whites are not being portrayed negatively. White nationalists are wracked by a great many delusions and that’s one of them.

    Then you’re either not paying attention or in denial. For example, movies about black and white race relations almost always depict the whites as moral reprobates and just plain wrong while blacks are holier than thou, right and righteous. Rosewood, A Time to Kill , Selma, and Higher Learning are just a small sampling. The only good whites are those who don’t take their own side and help blacks. Blacks invariably triumph over the dastardly whites.

    Django Unchained is a pure anti-white snuff film. Hidden Figures was fabricated history about how black women wuz queens of the space program and showed those cracka ass white men a thing or two about advanced math. In reality they played a very minor, almost inconsequential role and some of them were so light skinned they could almost pass as white.

    But those portrayals are conceived, written, produced and executed by white men.

    More like Jewish men and Jews don’t consider themselves as white Europeans and from a genetic standpoint they clearly are not white European. With all the pro-black crap emanating from Hollywood these days Jewish Hollywood has taken sides and it isn’t with whites.

    Read More
    • Replies: @grapesoda
    Set and match. :)
    , @Okechukwu

    Then you’re either not paying attention or in denial. For example, movies about black and white race relations almost always depict the whites as moral reprobates and just plain wrong while blacks are holier than thou, right and righteous. Rosewood, A Time to Kill , Selma, and Higher Learning are just a small sampling.
     
    These are historical films. How are you going to treat these periods without depicting white moral reprobates?

    The only good whites are those who don’t take their own side and help blacks
     
    There are only two choices in most films: good and evil. What you describe as not taking their own side is Hollywood trying to introduce good whites to counterbalance the evil ones, lest people go away thinking that all whites are evil. You cannot treat the klan or neo-nazis sympathetically. If that's what you want you might want to fly off to another planet.

    Django Unchained is a pure anti-white snuff film.
     
    It's a shame more of that didn't happen in real life. Nat Turner and John Brown were heroes. Interesting that you have nothing to say about the underlying slavery and brutality that motivated Django. The suffering of whites at the hands of Djando was a walk in the park compared to the real suffering of blacks.

    Hidden Figures was fabricated history about how black women wuz queens of the space program and showed those cracka ass white men a thing or two about advanced math.
     
    I'd rather take to word of the Smithsonian over a racist troll like you.

    The True Story of “Hidden Figures,” the Forgotten Black Women Who Helped Win the Space Race

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/forgotten-black-women-mathematicians-who-helped-win-wars-and-send-astronauts-space-180960393/


    More like Jewish men and Jews don’t consider themselves as white Europeans and from a genetic standpoint they clearly are not white European. With all the pro-black crap emanating from Hollywood these days Jewish Hollywood has taken sides and it isn’t with whites.
     
    Like virtually all white nationalists you are not in touch with reality whatsoever.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Okechukwu

    No one said anything about a boycott. The movies are simply losing their audience, and hundreds of millions of dollars are being left on the table in the form of ticket sales and the licensing of merchandising, and merchandising is the more lucrative revenue stream by far.
     
    Get a clue. The movie made $1 billion dollars in about 30 minutes of its release.

    There is a large worldwide audience of sane, normal people that vastly outnumbers embittered and deluded white bigots. Any film appealing to the white supremacist constituency will be dead on arrival. Unz is an echo-chamber. Most of these people here would be too ashamed to utter their tripe except under the cloak of anonymity. Even the denizens of Unz wouldn't queue up to watch a film that depicts their wacky theories and beliefs.


    For example, when the (((J.J. Abrams))) version came out a few years ago, stores had to send back the junk with the black guy on it, because no one was buying it. The girl character did a little better, but none of them sold anywhere near the product that Luke Skywalker, Hans Solo, and Darth Vader did.
     
    I played with action figures as a kid. I had all kinds of other Star Wars gear and model space ships. I just don't think those things are in with today's kids. Kids today are more into a visual or video game experience, which they will play with for about a day and then abandon for something else.

    “Get a clue. The movie made $1 billion dollars in about 30 minutes of its release.”

    Perhaps you should. This movie will make nowhere near that in profit (see above). It has also significantly underperformed the last one both domestically and overseas. Apparently, there is less of a huge global market for this kind of thing than you think; I believe it peaked at #4 in South Korea.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Okechukwu

    No one said anything about a boycott. The movies are simply losing their audience, and hundreds of millions of dollars are being left on the table in the form of ticket sales and the licensing of merchandising, and merchandising is the more lucrative revenue stream by far.
     
    Get a clue. The movie made $1 billion dollars in about 30 minutes of its release.

    There is a large worldwide audience of sane, normal people that vastly outnumbers embittered and deluded white bigots. Any film appealing to the white supremacist constituency will be dead on arrival. Unz is an echo-chamber. Most of these people here would be too ashamed to utter their tripe except under the cloak of anonymity. Even the denizens of Unz wouldn't queue up to watch a film that depicts their wacky theories and beliefs.


    For example, when the (((J.J. Abrams))) version came out a few years ago, stores had to send back the junk with the black guy on it, because no one was buying it. The girl character did a little better, but none of them sold anywhere near the product that Luke Skywalker, Hans Solo, and Darth Vader did.
     
    I played with action figures as a kid. I had all kinds of other Star Wars gear and model space ships. I just don't think those things are in with today's kids. Kids today are more into a visual or video game experience, which they will play with for about a day and then abandon for something else.

    “I played with action figures as a kid. I had all kinds of other Star Wars gear and model space ships. I just don’t think those things are in with today’s kids.”

    1. These items are still very profitable.

    2. We’re not just talking about toys but about a variety of other merchandise – everything from lunchboxes and t-shirts to specialty food items.

    3. Several PC video games have tanked in the last few years, so there is reason to suspect that the same would happen with this market.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Okechukwu

    I don’t think whites who want to see their group portrayed positively in film and other media are necessarily bigots or white supremacists.
     
    Whites are not being portrayed negatively. White nationalists are wracked by a great many delusions and that's one of them. Arguably, men (men of all races) are portrayed somewhat negatively. But those portrayals are conceived, written, produced and executed by white men. I've been to YouTube and have seen the overtly sexist and misogynistic ways in which women used to be portrayed in commercials and old movies. Maybe the dumb, clumsy male character is a counter-reaction to that in the age of feminism.

    “Whites are not being portrayed negatively.”

    Is that why nearly all the bad guys are white? And didn’t one of the writers of The Force Awakens claim that the First Order are “white supremacists”? It doesn’t seem hard to draw that conclusion based on the evidence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Didn't Morgan Freeman complain that he couldn't get roles as the villain because Hollywood won't show blacks in a negative light? Didn't he want to play the role of Hannibal Lecter?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jtl172
    "There is a large worldwide audience of sane, normal people that vastly outnumbers embittered and deluded white bigots. Any film appealing to the white supremacist constituency will be dead on arrival. Unz is an echo-chamber. Most of these people here would be too ashamed to utter their tripe except under the cloak of anonymity."

    I don't think whites who want to see their group portrayed positively in film and other media are necessarily bigots or white supremacists. And while it is true that the dominant leftist, anti-white culture in much of the world means that the film will be popular and that people will be hesitant to share pro-white views in public, cultural dominance is not the same as moral vindication. For example, those who opposed the Nazis in Hitler's Germany, or the Communists in Stalin's Russia or Mao's China may have been at odds with the dominant culture and unwilling to discuss their views in public; that certainly doesn't make those regimes morally justifiable or their opponents detestable.

    I don’t think whites who want to see their group portrayed positively in film and other media are necessarily bigots or white supremacists.

    Whites are not being portrayed negatively. White nationalists are wracked by a great many delusions and that’s one of them. Arguably, men (men of all races) are portrayed somewhat negatively. But those portrayals are conceived, written, produced and executed by white men. I’ve been to YouTube and have seen the overtly sexist and misogynistic ways in which women used to be portrayed in commercials and old movies. Maybe the dumb, clumsy male character is a counter-reaction to that in the age of feminism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "Whites are not being portrayed negatively."

    Is that why nearly all the bad guys are white? And didn't one of the writers of The Force Awakens claim that the First Order are "white supremacists"? It doesn't seem hard to draw that conclusion based on the evidence.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Okechukwu

    No one said anything about a boycott. The movies are simply losing their audience, and hundreds of millions of dollars are being left on the table in the form of ticket sales and the licensing of merchandising, and merchandising is the more lucrative revenue stream by far.
     
    Get a clue. The movie made $1 billion dollars in about 30 minutes of its release.

    There is a large worldwide audience of sane, normal people that vastly outnumbers embittered and deluded white bigots. Any film appealing to the white supremacist constituency will be dead on arrival. Unz is an echo-chamber. Most of these people here would be too ashamed to utter their tripe except under the cloak of anonymity. Even the denizens of Unz wouldn't queue up to watch a film that depicts their wacky theories and beliefs.


    For example, when the (((J.J. Abrams))) version came out a few years ago, stores had to send back the junk with the black guy on it, because no one was buying it. The girl character did a little better, but none of them sold anywhere near the product that Luke Skywalker, Hans Solo, and Darth Vader did.
     
    I played with action figures as a kid. I had all kinds of other Star Wars gear and model space ships. I just don't think those things are in with today's kids. Kids today are more into a visual or video game experience, which they will play with for about a day and then abandon for something else.

    “There is a large worldwide audience of sane, normal people that vastly outnumbers embittered and deluded white bigots. Any film appealing to the white supremacist constituency will be dead on arrival. Unz is an echo-chamber. Most of these people here would be too ashamed to utter their tripe except under the cloak of anonymity.”

    I don’t think whites who want to see their group portrayed positively in film and other media are necessarily bigots or white supremacists. And while it is true that the dominant leftist, anti-white culture in much of the world means that the film will be popular and that people will be hesitant to share pro-white views in public, cultural dominance is not the same as moral vindication. For example, those who opposed the Nazis in Hitler’s Germany, or the Communists in Stalin’s Russia or Mao’s China may have been at odds with the dominant culture and unwilling to discuss their views in public; that certainly doesn’t make those regimes morally justifiable or their opponents detestable.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Okechukwu

    I don’t think whites who want to see their group portrayed positively in film and other media are necessarily bigots or white supremacists.
     
    Whites are not being portrayed negatively. White nationalists are wracked by a great many delusions and that's one of them. Arguably, men (men of all races) are portrayed somewhat negatively. But those portrayals are conceived, written, produced and executed by white men. I've been to YouTube and have seen the overtly sexist and misogynistic ways in which women used to be portrayed in commercials and old movies. Maybe the dumb, clumsy male character is a counter-reaction to that in the age of feminism.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “11 writers and artists…”

    Ah, script-writing by committee. That explains the idiotic plot and bizarre character actions. Who voted for Luke to evaporate rather than fight?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Well if I remember correctly, the stormtroopers are clones, so if the guy that left them because of his conscious in “force awakens” is black, then 99% of all the bad guys are black.
    So this is actually a racist movie portraying black people as bad :)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Gleimhart
    No one said anything about a boycott. The movies are simply losing their audience, and hundreds of millions of dollars are being left on the table in the form of ticket sales and the licensing of merchandising, and merchandising is the more lucrative revenue stream by far.

    For example, when the (((J.J. Abrams))) version came out a few years ago, stores had to send back the junk with the black guy on it, because no one was buying it. The girl character did a little better, but none of them sold anywhere near the product that Luke Skywalker, Hans Solo, and Darth Vader did.

    If you think corporations don't care when they're not making nearly as much money as they could, then you don't know a bloody thing about corporations.

    Also, there's no such thing as a "normal, mainstream audience." That's precisely the sort of thing that goes bye-bye when diversity is the order of the day.

    No one said anything about a boycott. The movies are simply losing their audience, and hundreds of millions of dollars are being left on the table in the form of ticket sales and the licensing of merchandising, and merchandising is the more lucrative revenue stream by far.

    Get a clue. The movie made $1 billion dollars in about 30 minutes of its release.

    There is a large worldwide audience of sane, normal people that vastly outnumbers embittered and deluded white bigots. Any film appealing to the white supremacist constituency will be dead on arrival. Unz is an echo-chamber. Most of these people here would be too ashamed to utter their tripe except under the cloak of anonymity. Even the denizens of Unz wouldn’t queue up to watch a film that depicts their wacky theories and beliefs.

    For example, when the (((J.J. Abrams))) version came out a few years ago, stores had to send back the junk with the black guy on it, because no one was buying it. The girl character did a little better, but none of them sold anywhere near the product that Luke Skywalker, Hans Solo, and Darth Vader did.

    I played with action figures as a kid. I had all kinds of other Star Wars gear and model space ships. I just don’t think those things are in with today’s kids. Kids today are more into a visual or video game experience, which they will play with for about a day and then abandon for something else.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jtl172
    "There is a large worldwide audience of sane, normal people that vastly outnumbers embittered and deluded white bigots. Any film appealing to the white supremacist constituency will be dead on arrival. Unz is an echo-chamber. Most of these people here would be too ashamed to utter their tripe except under the cloak of anonymity."

    I don't think whites who want to see their group portrayed positively in film and other media are necessarily bigots or white supremacists. And while it is true that the dominant leftist, anti-white culture in much of the world means that the film will be popular and that people will be hesitant to share pro-white views in public, cultural dominance is not the same as moral vindication. For example, those who opposed the Nazis in Hitler's Germany, or the Communists in Stalin's Russia or Mao's China may have been at odds with the dominant culture and unwilling to discuss their views in public; that certainly doesn't make those regimes morally justifiable or their opponents detestable.
    , @Anon
    "I played with action figures as a kid. I had all kinds of other Star Wars gear and model space ships. I just don’t think those things are in with today’s kids."

    1. These items are still very profitable.

    2. We're not just talking about toys but about a variety of other merchandise - everything from lunchboxes and t-shirts to specialty food items.

    3. Several PC video games have tanked in the last few years, so there is reason to suspect that the same would happen with this market.

    , @Anon
    "Get a clue. The movie made $1 billion dollars in about 30 minutes of its release."

    Perhaps you should. This movie will make nowhere near that in profit (see above). It has also significantly underperformed the last one both domestically and overseas. Apparently, there is less of a huge global market for this kind of thing than you think; I believe it peaked at #4 in South Korea.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @J.Ross
    ... but that's what happens anyway, and Paul has evolved even beyond the level of Stage Threes, so it's the paradigm shift (you only need spice by the ton if you're relying on the Guild, abd you're relying on the Guild because the Sleeper has not yet awakened). I have yet to see a good takedown of Lynch's Dune. It and Flash Gordon have surpassed and survived all the more-successful flotsam of that era.
    Don't want to get into fanboyism.
    I have a certain under-nourished thesis about establishmentarian propaganda getting smarter. Emotional arguing has surpassed all other polemical formats without detection. Fiction allows the creator to make a whole world in which their enemies really are the straw man caricatures portrayed, supported now by in-world logic and histories and therefore made "reasonable." It distresses me to come out of the Gen X hyper media awareness of Max Headroom and Neil Postman and see people falling for this literally Bolshevik small beer.
    Quick, remember the movies Blow, Trainspotting and the shoved-in DEA sequence from the Limey, and identify a cop acting less than perfectly professionally. They're episodes of Dragnet with porn and cursing and good soundtracks distracting you from how square they are. An authentically countercultural movie about the drug war would surely at least remark on the drug war being fake or police corruption.
    Similarly with a lot of SJW-addled Hollywood products, they're massively, clumsily, unapologetically propagandistic, but with such deep immersion into their worldview that a mistaken denial is possible. People are still thinking about propaganda in terms of Frank Capra or The FBI Story, which was a very honest and straightforward exposition: nothing is being snuck in, it's slapping your forehead. Instead we should consider the unapologetic one-sidedness of American Vietnam flicks, or the Israeli movie Siege (or They Were Ten, or Hill 24 Doesn't Answer). All the arguing is emotional and so largely invisibile to folks who should know better.

    Emotional arguing has surpassed all other polemical formats without detection.

    It works because emotional arguments are difficult to oppose. People don’t want to try to understand complex problems. They want to believe that there’s always a simple answer that they can find merely by consulting their feelings. If it feels right then it must be right. This applies especially to women.

    If you try to oppose an emotional argument with facts or logic they just switch off. If you try to oppose an emotional argument with other emotional arguments it upsets them and they assume you’re just mean and nasty. You must be a hater.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Gleimhart
    No one said anything about a boycott. The movies are simply losing their audience, and hundreds of millions of dollars are being left on the table in the form of ticket sales and the licensing of merchandising, and merchandising is the more lucrative revenue stream by far.

    For example, when the (((J.J. Abrams))) version came out a few years ago, stores had to send back the junk with the black guy on it, because no one was buying it. The girl character did a little better, but none of them sold anywhere near the product that Luke Skywalker, Hans Solo, and Darth Vader did.

    If you think corporations don't care when they're not making nearly as much money as they could, then you don't know a bloody thing about corporations.

    Also, there's no such thing as a "normal, mainstream audience." That's precisely the sort of thing that goes bye-bye when diversity is the order of the day.

    stores had to send back the junk with the black guy on it, because no one was buying it

    Yeah – if you’re gonna have a Black guy, make sure he’s a smooth-talking, ladies’ man, space pirate:

    http://www.finalfrontiertoys.com/starwars/star-wars-carded-figures-diecast/empire-strikes-back/esb-31-back-moc/lando-calrissian-esb-31-back-no-offer-moc-c-8-5.html

    Those did sell!

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    I agree that Hollywood has an agenda , but this article and some comments here are clutching at straws. The hero in this movie is a white girl , how is this movie anti white. SPOILER The future hero is a young white boy ( shown at end ). The black and Asian girl were a sideshow. The other hero of the movie was POE a white male. I think that many here won’t watch the movie and just accept this crazy article

    Everyone’s wrong but you!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Okechukwu
    Hehe. Another boycott, eh? Go ahead. Hollywood makes more money appealing to a normal, mainstream audience. They don't care about your faux boycotts.

    No one said anything about a boycott. The movies are simply losing their audience, and hundreds of millions of dollars are being left on the table in the form of ticket sales and the licensing of merchandising, and merchandising is the more lucrative revenue stream by far.

    For example, when the (((J.J. Abrams))) version came out a few years ago, stores had to send back the junk with the black guy on it, because no one was buying it. The girl character did a little better, but none of them sold anywhere near the product that Luke Skywalker, Hans Solo, and Darth Vader did.

    If you think corporations don’t care when they’re not making nearly as much money as they could, then you don’t know a bloody thing about corporations.

    Also, there’s no such thing as a “normal, mainstream audience.” That’s precisely the sort of thing that goes bye-bye when diversity is the order of the day.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha

    stores had to send back the junk with the black guy on it, because no one was buying it
     
    Yeah - if you're gonna have a Black guy, make sure he's a smooth-talking, ladies' man, space pirate:
    http://www.finalfrontiertoys.com/starwars/star-wars-carded-figures-diecast/empire-strikes-back/esb-31-back-moc/lando-calrissian-esb-31-back-no-offer-moc-c-8-5.html

    Those did sell!

    Peace.
    , @Okechukwu

    No one said anything about a boycott. The movies are simply losing their audience, and hundreds of millions of dollars are being left on the table in the form of ticket sales and the licensing of merchandising, and merchandising is the more lucrative revenue stream by far.
     
    Get a clue. The movie made $1 billion dollars in about 30 minutes of its release.

    There is a large worldwide audience of sane, normal people that vastly outnumbers embittered and deluded white bigots. Any film appealing to the white supremacist constituency will be dead on arrival. Unz is an echo-chamber. Most of these people here would be too ashamed to utter their tripe except under the cloak of anonymity. Even the denizens of Unz wouldn't queue up to watch a film that depicts their wacky theories and beliefs.


    For example, when the (((J.J. Abrams))) version came out a few years ago, stores had to send back the junk with the black guy on it, because no one was buying it. The girl character did a little better, but none of them sold anywhere near the product that Luke Skywalker, Hans Solo, and Darth Vader did.
     
    I played with action figures as a kid. I had all kinds of other Star Wars gear and model space ships. I just don't think those things are in with today's kids. Kids today are more into a visual or video game experience, which they will play with for about a day and then abandon for something else.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Gene Su
    Too much literature and drama in the twentieth century has been lobotomized. It even started earlier with "A Wrinkle in Time" (now being made into another Disney movie). Plot centered around a sister using her "love" to reach out to her brainwashed brother. Maybe that's where JK Rowling got the plot for "Harry Potter" from.

    But I think I know the real reason why "dumbed down" literature and stories like "Star Wars", "A Wrinkle in Time", and "Star Trek" (which relies on too much technobabble to solve every problem miraculously painlessly) appear to so many modern humans (and particularly modern Westerners). It is not just our decreasing standards of education. We live in a very stressed out world. Our lives are constantly on the go. We have no chance to relax. It is also the reason why mindless entertainment like football and "pro rassling" appeals to us. Linh Dinh wrote an excellent essay on this a year ago. This applies also to the poorest among us (or maybe especially the poorest among us?).

    Most of Hairy Porter was ripped unashamedly from Neil (((Gaiman))). Who is rich and talented enough to not give a monkey’s about fan-fic like that, and has been quoted saying as much.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Andrei Martyanov

    many films which form the archetypes for many Hollywood plots anyway
     
    Star Wars is a bastardization of Herbert's Dune, from the so called "Force" being a pathetic pseudo-religious derivative of the Weirding Way, as an example, to the whole geopolitical concept. Granted, of course, that Frank Herbert's son, grossly under-talented when compared to his father bastardized Dune sequels and turned them into...Star Wars. No surprise when one of his collaborators is the guy who writes this Star Wars tedious crap. Watching warfare in SW is altogether a very painful tactical and operational experience, the same goes to their combat technology, especially a ground one--I guess this technology was conceived by creators of F-35 and Littoral Combat Ships. Today's Hollywood is a sewer, it is over for them, bar some once in a while gems accidentally produced under the radar of their cultural and social perversion.

    I read some of the Dune novels. They were OK.

    I think what George Lucas should have done was get one of his Expanded Universe writers to write the script for the prequels, particularly Revenge of the Script. It’s obvious that the man can’t write good dialogue for his life.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Z-man
    Walt Disney is tuning in his grave.

    I heard that Disney might adapt the Tripod trilogy in the near future (White Mountains, City of Lead and Gold, Pool of Fire). I hope that they don’t mess that up. In particular, the protagonists are supposed to be 3 European white boys. I hope they don’t change that. I note that that fine piece of literature was written by a Brit, not an American.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Andrei Martyanov

    Interestingly, they do not even try to make movies based upon Azimov especially
     
    Too smart, too complex. They used to, however, produce wonderful TV Series such as The Twilight Zone and The Outer Limits, even more recent The Fringe was world-class (well, J.J. Abrams, after all). The rest today is a cultural propaganda. Really sad. I am forced, however, to single out: Interstellar, Arrival (with Amy Adams) and, of course, WALL-E as stand alone masterpieces. Even Oblivion was not bad. But they were nowhere near in prominence (with the exception of WALL-E) with such vomit-inducing crap like the Hunger Games or Divergent or Star Wars--you name it. The whole premise of the Hunger Games is altogether--a mindless contrived lunacy. The excellent Snowpiercer is altogether a Korean-Czech movie.

    Too much literature and drama in the twentieth century has been lobotomized. It even started earlier with “A Wrinkle in Time” (now being made into another Disney movie). Plot centered around a sister using her “love” to reach out to her brainwashed brother. Maybe that’s where JK Rowling got the plot for “Harry Potter” from.

    But I think I know the real reason why “dumbed down” literature and stories like “Star Wars”, “A Wrinkle in Time”, and “Star Trek” (which relies on too much technobabble to solve every problem miraculously painlessly) appear to so many modern humans (and particularly modern Westerners). It is not just our decreasing standards of education. We live in a very stressed out world. Our lives are constantly on the go. We have no chance to relax. It is also the reason why mindless entertainment like football and “pro rassling” appeals to us. Linh Dinh wrote an excellent essay on this a year ago. This applies also to the poorest among us (or maybe especially the poorest among us?).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
    Most of Hairy Porter was ripped unashamedly from Neil (((Gaiman))). Who is rich and talented enough to not give a monkey's about fan-fic like that, and has been quoted saying as much.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    I agree that Hollywood has an agenda , but this article and some comments here are clutching at straws. The hero in this movie is a white girl , how is this movie anti white. SPOILER The future hero is a young white boy ( shown at end ). The black and Asian girl were a sideshow. The other hero of the movie was POE a white male. I think that many here won’t watch the movie and just accept this crazy article

    Look at this flagrantly dishonest comment and understand that paid trolling (“content” and “perception management”) is real and it sure as hell does not come from Russia.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @El Dato
    Don't worry about it.

    Also I really can't agree that Lynch's vision is outstanding. It has is Lynchian charms but it has not that much to do with "Dune" and additionally Lunch murders the whole structure in the final scene as if with a final, bad joke. Yes, making it magically rain on Arrakis will KILL THE SPICE and thus Paul's empire, dead.

    … but that’s what happens anyway, and Paul has evolved even beyond the level of Stage Threes, so it’s the paradigm shift (you only need spice by the ton if you’re relying on the Guild, abd you’re relying on the Guild because the Sleeper has not yet awakened). I have yet to see a good takedown of Lynch’s Dune. It and Flash Gordon have surpassed and survived all the more-successful flotsam of that era.
    Don’t want to get into fanboyism.
    I have a certain under-nourished thesis about establishmentarian propaganda getting smarter. Emotional arguing has surpassed all other polemical formats without detection. Fiction allows the creator to make a whole world in which their enemies really are the straw man caricatures portrayed, supported now by in-world logic and histories and therefore made “reasonable.” It distresses me to come out of the Gen X hyper media awareness of Max Headroom and Neil Postman and see people falling for this literally Bolshevik small beer.
    Quick, remember the movies Blow, Trainspotting and the shoved-in DEA sequence from the Limey, and identify a cop acting less than perfectly professionally. They’re episodes of Dragnet with porn and cursing and good soundtracks distracting you from how square they are. An authentically countercultural movie about the drug war would surely at least remark on the drug war being fake or police corruption.
    Similarly with a lot of SJW-addled Hollywood products, they’re massively, clumsily, unapologetically propagandistic, but with such deep immersion into their worldview that a mistaken denial is possible. People are still thinking about propaganda in terms of Frank Capra or The FBI Story, which was a very honest and straightforward exposition: nothing is being snuck in, it’s slapping your forehead. Instead we should consider the unapologetic one-sidedness of American Vietnam flicks, or the Israeli movie Siege (or They Were Ten, or Hill 24 Doesn’t Answer). All the arguing is emotional and so largely invisibile to folks who should know better.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dfordoom

    Emotional arguing has surpassed all other polemical formats without detection.
     
    It works because emotional arguments are difficult to oppose. People don't want to try to understand complex problems. They want to believe that there's always a simple answer that they can find merely by consulting their feelings. If it feels right then it must be right. This applies especially to women.

    If you try to oppose an emotional argument with facts or logic they just switch off. If you try to oppose an emotional argument with other emotional arguments it upsets them and they assume you're just mean and nasty. You must be a hater.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • My Gen Z kid said that he didn’t like TLJ because it seemed made for adults.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon • Disclaimer says:

    I agree that Hollywood has an agenda , but this article and some comments here are clutching at straws. The hero in this movie is a white girl , how is this movie anti white. SPOILER The future hero is a young white boy ( shown at end ). The black and Asian girl were a sideshow. The other hero of the movie was POE a white male. I think that many here won’t watch the movie and just accept this crazy article

    Read More
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    Look at this flagrantly dishonest comment and understand that paid trolling ("content" and "perception management") is real and it sure as hell does not come from Russia.
    , @Gleimhart
    Everyone's wrong but you!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Avis McAdoo
    I do absolutely believe that the Real Top Hebrews at the mouse company (and the shlubs who write for them) deliberately tried to make this an anti white male movie, but in order for it to work you still have to know how to write a freaking story. Instead we got a multicult fairy tale where the rainbow coalition screws up everything they touch; the "Resistance" are actually the military of the government that's been in power for 40 years and are getting their asses kicked by the lily white insurgents of the FO; and the only reason any of them survive at all is because an old white man comes out of retirement to save them.

    Basically, it's an SJW epic fail.

    I got the impression as I sat there that, unlike most crimes, there was very little evidence of a “controlling mind”.

    I wouldn’t be surprised to discover that the whole storyline was written by committee. If that committee had turned up late, stuck their feet on the giant boardroom table, and decided the first move was to start knocking back cocktails, while the “scriptwriter” was in the toilet nervously waiting for them to each turn out a random ten pages on anything that came into their heads.

    What was that [giant floppy animals and casino] episode about, for starters? Relevance to anything else? Apart from the unpleasant little moppet with the Ring shoehorned in at the end, for a “same time next week folks” continuity moment.
    Or the Pit of Darkside well-thing on the skellig. Its part got built up impressively before Mary-Sue decides to pop into it for a nosey, wrinkles her nose at the wallpaper and hangings, and wanders out again unscathed, with nobody any the wiser as to its purpose. Was it supposed to demonstrate the banality of evil?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ali Choudhury
    I don't care much for the new Star Wars movies due to the poverty of ideas and blatant rehashing they represent, but I can't see them as anti-white movies. The most prominent, competent and powerful characters are white: Luke, Leia, Rey, Kylo, Hux, Poe Dameron (looks like he has mostly Euro ancestry) and Laura Dern's character. The two major non-white main characters Finn and Rose go on a pointless wild goose chase and avoiding spoilers, screw thing up majorly.

    Disney's second highest grosser Beauty and the Beast had minimal non-white participation and the Marvel movies overwhelmingly have white males as the superheroic leads.

    I do absolutely believe that the Real Top Hebrews at the mouse company (and the shlubs who write for them) deliberately tried to make this an anti white male movie, but in order for it to work you still have to know how to write a freaking story. Instead we got a multicult fairy tale where the rainbow coalition screws up everything they touch; the “Resistance” are actually the military of the government that’s been in power for 40 years and are getting their asses kicked by the lily white insurgents of the FO; and the only reason any of them survive at all is because an old white man comes out of retirement to save them.

    Basically, it’s an SJW epic fail.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
    I got the impression as I sat there that, unlike most crimes, there was very little evidence of a "controlling mind".

    I wouldn't be surprised to discover that the whole storyline was written by committee. If that committee had turned up late, stuck their feet on the giant boardroom table, and decided the first move was to start knocking back cocktails, while the "scriptwriter" was in the toilet nervously waiting for them to each turn out a random ten pages on anything that came into their heads.

    What was that [giant floppy animals and casino] episode about, for starters? Relevance to anything else? Apart from the unpleasant little moppet with the Ring shoehorned in at the end, for a "same time next week folks" continuity moment.
    Or the Pit of Darkside well-thing on the skellig. Its part got built up impressively before Mary-Sue decides to pop into it for a nosey, wrinkles her nose at the wallpaper and hangings, and wanders out again unscathed, with nobody any the wiser as to its purpose. Was it supposed to demonstrate the banality of evil?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @wayfarer
    2018, year of the “earth dog.”

    Let's hope it's a good one, for all.

    source: https://www.thechinesezodiac.org/horoscope-2018/

    http://www.cutenessoverflow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/African-wild-dog-puppies.jpg

    Good for you to knowing re five-elements combo.

    I am very dubious of these forms of divination, but the Chinese one has good symbolism in that nobody is living through the combination of animal and element at time of birth more than twice.

    In Japan, we also have a six-day cycle, and a system of unlucky years, among others, those mainly from elsewhere.

    Last night in Tokyo, clear sky and full moon on the night of New Year’s Day, am thinking that is auspicious.

    However, almost no stars as always. Full moon + light pollution = even fewer visible stars and planets, even on a crystalline night.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I’ve never seen a Star War’s movie but I recall at the dawn of Star Wars the world’s biggest movie star was Clint Eastwood. In fact, Richard Grenier wrote a piece, I think for Commentary, with that exact title. He was not the ‘kinder gentler’ Clint Eastwood of the post Reagan era movies either but the original ‘Man with No Name’ version unless he was portraying the fascist cop Dirty Harry!

    Hollywood doesn’t make those kind of movies anymore. I saw an advertisement masquerading as a news story yesterday showing trailers of upcoming films. It was all CGI and Third World characters with the occasional celebrity ( hello Oprah) posing as actors. I’ll see none of this trash either.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Lol, so funny to read an article of a white guy whining abount a movie that “portrayed white guys as bad guys”. Dude, where were you when literally many or most hollywood movies portrayed chinese, mexican, japanese, or koreans as all bad guys. Just make me laugh.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @AndrewR
    Why treat him as someone worthy of earnestly engaging with?

    One more thing, I’m a girl.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @El Dato
    A review with obligatory moan in the "The Jewish Review of Books":

    Jews of Dune

    But the flip side of this denigration of the Jews as a “fossil-people” is a Christian anxiety that the Jews—who claim biological kinship with the patriarchs, prophets, and messiah—naturally possess that with which Christians have a more uncertain relationship. Herbert’s Dune novels are all animated by the conviction that the truth is in our genes. The problem Jews pose for Hebert, then, is not that they are unnecessary to his fictional universe, but that they appear to anticipate it because of their familial, corporeal relationship with the divine. At one point, a Bene Gesserit member remarks: “Jews are amused and sometimes dismayed at what they interpret as our copying them. Our breeding records dominated by the female line to control the mating pattern are seen as Jewish.” There appears to be a kind of theological resentment at work.
     
    Also, my posting resistance is low:

    Bene Gesserit witches fixing Paul Atreides. No wait, that's another story....

    https://youtu.be/aGQrnKcH-74?t=114

    The Cherokee Tribe also tied their breeding records to the female likely thousands of years prior to the Jews becoming a tribe. So? Did the Jews copy the Amerind? Who’s on first?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Did not bother with the latest Star Wars flick as I had heard about the agenda creep that overtook the story line.

    I did go to see Murder on the Orient Express. The Zionist Agenda has not overtaken this ancient tale as yet, but, the ticket for two cost more on my first trip on the Orient Express in 1955, Second Class from Salzburg to Vienna. Matter of fact, the seven dolor something price for a small bag of popcorn could have cost even more as I forget the actual Austrian Shilling price of the Reise. (Trip)

    I did ride the club car for most of the trip and enjoyed it immensely. Couldn’t say as much for the movie.

    The Jewish agenda has certainly overtaken the cost of going to a movie as I hear, for a family of four it can top $100.00. Screwum. I’ll read a good book from the public library written by a Conservative White Author.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @dfordoom

    Stop .. showing … ANY … Hollywood .. movies to your children … already. Damn, what does it take, people? Stop being naive. Stop trusting that maybe THIS movie or show isn’t so bad. Just stop.
     
    I agree totally but you're wasting your time. They'll keep lining up to give their money to Disney so Disney can make more anti-civilisational movies.

    There's just no way to get through to people that all modern pop culture, including all TV and all Hollywood movies, is not just awful but actively evil.

    And they'll keep exposing their kids to this cultural poison.

    Of course, they will continue to tithe to Hellywood! That is their GOD, their IDOL, their DESTINY!

    The Christian God has been told to go fuck off and die. Man is in charge now. GIVE US BARABBAS! LEAD US INTO TEMPTATION! DRIVEN TO DISTRACTION! WE ARE THE CULT OF PERSONALITY! DO NOT JUDGE US! OUR CHILDREN FOR PLEASURE!

    And if you’re a Christian: YOU INTERFERE WITH OUR WORSHIP AND YOU’RE GONNA WISH YOU WERE DEAD.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @AndrewR
    You are either an anti-white troll trying to make pro-white people look bad, or you are a textbook example of the type of person who repels people towards the anti-white agenda. If most white people were like you then I'd be anti-white too.

    Another cuck who has problems with facts. There’s been a lot of going back and forth about why Star Wars degenerated. Simple reason: George Lucas married a negress and has black offspring. If you did not know this, but now you do, and you cannot figure it out logically, you are the problem.

    Derbyshire has explicitly stated that Asians are superior to Caucasians. If that isn’t an in your face anti-white statement, I don’t know what is. Other commentators get angry because I point out these things. They believe wives, offspring do not matter. Pure degeneracy and madness!!!

    Groid/gloid lover (((Molyneux))) consistently states in his podcasts that Jews and Asians are superior to Caucasians. And he wants us to be like Jews to survive! WOW!!!

    Methinks there is something in your background that is causing these problems. You’re playing the Hitler card. I always use the word Caucasian because many whites do not fit the blond, blue-eyed Hitler archetype. There have other commentators who come with idiotic statements about Italians, Greeks, the Irish. A Caucasian movement means no blacks/Asians/Jews -easily identified peoples. I don’t go believe most of that DNA stuff. Some guy Lee Rogers with the Daily Stormer got his results and he’s 0.5% Jewish. This is meaningless. You have to look at parentage. Today with modern medicine, blood transfusions and organ and tissue transplants can alter DNA. Yes, there is a racial aspect to blood. But if your life is in danger and you need these things to survive you will accept them.

    We know that George Lucas, John Derbyshire cannot be a part of any white movements. They have chosen sides and so have their offspring. Derbyshire’s Chinese wife and daughter voted for Obama. He’s infamous for being fired from National Review for his article about The Talk concerning blacks as friends. Obviously, his wife and daughter ignored him about this. Even though Lucas no longer controls Star Wars, he is happy with the new results. I see no reason for Derbyshire to waste time scribbling.

    You are the problem.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A review with obligatory moan in the “The Jewish Review of Books”:

    Jews of Dune

    But the flip side of this denigration of the Jews as a “fossil-people” is a Christian anxiety that the Jews—who claim biological kinship with the patriarchs, prophets, and messiah—naturally possess that with which Christians have a more uncertain relationship. Herbert’s Dune novels are all animated by the conviction that the truth is in our genes. The problem Jews pose for Hebert, then, is not that they are unnecessary to his fictional universe, but that they appear to anticipate it because of their familial, corporeal relationship with the divine. At one point, a Bene Gesserit member remarks: “Jews are amused and sometimes dismayed at what they interpret as our copying them. Our breeding records dominated by the female line to control the mating pattern are seen as Jewish.” There appears to be a kind of theological resentment at work.

    Also, my posting resistance is low:

    Bene Gesserit witches fixing Paul Atreides. No wait, that’s another story….

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andy osnard
    The Cherokee Tribe also tied their breeding records to the female likely thousands of years prior to the Jews becoming a tribe. So? Did the Jews copy the Amerind? Who's on first?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Intelligent Dasein
    I can't claim to have ever really liked Star Wars. In retrospect, the only thing good about the original trilogy was the time of my life it came out in. I was a kid then, and happier. That's about it.

    But I remember being very strongly affected by David Lynch's Dune. I first saw it when I was about 7 years old, I think, one evening when my parents and a whole entourage from our church were meeting in the home of some associates of theirs in a neighboring city (I recall the drive there and back being interminable).

    I was running around outside, doing damage and getting into trouble as usual, so after the perfunctory beatings from my father, his more enlightened, upper class hosts decided to sit me down with a good movie to keep me occupied.

    That movie happened to be Dune. I don't know if they owned it or if it was being shown on cable or what, but it was the Alan Smithee cut, the full 3-hour extravaganza. Now, we didn't have a television in our house when I was a kid, so just getting to watch a movie was something of a treat in itself. But getting to watch Dune at just that particular time in my life under just those circumstances was nothing short of a divine gift. More than the story itself (which I admittedly was unable to follow at that young age) was the general atmosphere, that curious mix of science, philosophy, and mysticism which seemed to hold endless wonders and conceal endless secrets. It resonated with me very profoundly.

    Quite. It seems to be the desert that gives rise to mysticism in general. Hey we got a couple of testaments and Castaneda’s Peyotle-fuelled trips from it.

    Moebius on his desert experiences:

    I first saw it when I was about 7 years old, I think

    This is mental abuse of minors.

    At 15, the Lnychian Baron’s sad predilection for screaming, power play, terror, blood and getting off at snuffing boys was enough for a couple of months.

    Also:

    David Lynch’s Dune is What You Get When You Build a Science Fictional World With No Interest in Science Fiction

    In the distilling of the plot, every other branch of the story becomes superfluous—and many of the characters do too. This results in the Harkonnens doing nothing in the film besides being despicable to the grandest extremes Lynch can summon. Forget any semblance of intelligence and scheming, the Baron Harkonnen has been reduced to a rabid dog of a man who screams and spins and bounces to and fro like a punctured balloon. The movie also has the distinction of branding the character in an explicitly homophobic light by heightening the Baron’s actions and displaying them all at once: in a single scene we watch the man have his facial sores drained by a doctor (which gay writer Dennis Altman has pointed out appears to be part of the pervasive AIDS imagery that suffused pop culture in the 80s) before abruptly sexually assaulting and brutally murdering a young male servant, bleeding him out while his relatives observe. The choice to connect these moments visually in one savage blow cannot be overlooked or underestimated… particularly when the very next scene shows a flash of Lady Jessica and Duke Leto making love. It is a very literal Point-A-to-Point-B association of homosexuality with perversion, violence, and sickness, contrasted immediately with heterosexuality signifying loving, caring bonds and relationships.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @AndrewR
    Why treat him as someone worthy of earnestly engaging with?

    It’s occasionally amusing to estimate how much of this sort of creature’s worthless existence is bound up with obsessively spamming every comment thread available with “challenging” contrarianism and plain autistic screeching. “Cuck” is quite telling, seems to weigh heavily on its mind. Never crosses mine.
    It’s a full-time occupation for some of these harmless, purposeless shut-ins. The key indicator is they never, ever supply genuine, verifiable information for the wider edification of the laity. Screech screech screechity screech. I imagine it’s supposed to be intimidating, or humiliating or whatever. Like a spoiled toddler. Effing hilarious.

    Do it again, my little hen. Please. Stamp your tiny foot.
    It’s not as though you’ve got anything else going on.

    Read More
    • Agree: AndrewR
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Expletive Deleted
    You and I might well fall out.
    His father, and my mother, are some kind of cousin. Althought the titles went extinct in the '70s, they were close friends of Edward and the American Woman, and lost favour after the War due to fashy opinions and lack of heirs (made the Kents look like hippies).
    Young Stef there is I think more of the Calais/Irish line, rather than Sefton (& Croxteth), but it's still, what, 952 years since they sauntered into the island?

    By the way, he looks right, nasty goat beard and baldy head and all. All my male (and possibly some female ..) cousins on that side have 'that look'.
    Who gives a flying fuck who his mam was? Azure a cross moline or. Women count for nothing, and the sooner you understand that, the happier you'll die.
    .

    Why treat him as someone worthy of earnestly engaging with?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
    It's occasionally amusing to estimate how much of this sort of creature's worthless existence is bound up with obsessively spamming every comment thread available with "challenging" contrarianism and plain autistic screeching. "Cuck" is quite telling, seems to weigh heavily on its mind. Never crosses mine.
    It's a full-time occupation for some of these harmless, purposeless shut-ins. The key indicator is they never, ever supply genuine, verifiable information for the wider edification of the laity. Screech screech screechity screech. I imagine it's supposed to be intimidating, or humiliating or whatever. Like a spoiled toddler. Effing hilarious.

    Do it again, my little hen. Please. Stamp your tiny foot.
    It's not as though you've got anything else going on.

    , @attilathehen
    One more thing, I'm a girl.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @attilathehen
    The degeneracy of the multi-culti, feminazi, anti-white nonsense of these Star Wars movies can be laid at the feet of George Lucas (a WASP). He is currently married to a negress and has black offspring. He is happy to go along with these changes to the Star Wars movies because he needs movies to which his black offspring can relate. The 1977 Star Wars doesn't even exist in Lucas's mind anymore because he knows his black offspring would not like it. His movie "American Graffiti" was a tribute to his 1950's all American upbringing in Modesto, California. I'm sure he now looks back with regret at that all white, wholesome time in the USA. He's getting jiggy with it.

    He's another version of the WASP John Derbyshire who married a Chinese woman and has Chinese offspring. https://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/of-course-harvard-discriminates-against-asians/
    In this article Derbyshire states: We can’t make whites as smart as East Asians. He has chosen the Chinese side as Lucas has chosen the negroid side. They believe blacks/Asians are smarter than Caucasians. They are not.

    'Groid/gloid lover (((Stefan Molyneux))) is just spouting his usual white man schtick to keep the shekels dropping in his tin cup. His mother was a German Jewess who fled Germany when Hitler took over. (((Molyneux))) been's doing several youtubes about endangered white males and how females are the cause of the problems in the West. Yet, he bawls for Venezuela (an over 80% nonwhite country with an average IQ of 84), the people are starving, women are selling their bodies, yada yada yada https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaScH2ucDOA

    He thinks the Chinese are smarter than Caucasians. See the 14:35 mark.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egYfNtx9f1g He believes the only way for the West to survive is to do what Jews have done. See 56 minute mark https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FduYWW-7cEM

    You can't blame the Jews for Lucas and Derbyshire. (((Molyneux))) just does what he does because he's Jewish.

    You are either an anti-white troll trying to make pro-white people look bad, or you are a textbook example of the type of person who repels people towards the anti-white agenda. If most white people were like you then I’d be anti-white too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Another cuck who has problems with facts. There's been a lot of going back and forth about why Star Wars degenerated. Simple reason: George Lucas married a negress and has black offspring. If you did not know this, but now you do, and you cannot figure it out logically, you are the problem.

    Derbyshire has explicitly stated that Asians are superior to Caucasians. If that isn't an in your face anti-white statement, I don't know what is. Other commentators get angry because I point out these things. They believe wives, offspring do not matter. Pure degeneracy and madness!!!

    Groid/gloid lover (((Molyneux))) consistently states in his podcasts that Jews and Asians are superior to Caucasians. And he wants us to be like Jews to survive! WOW!!!

    Methinks there is something in your background that is causing these problems. You're playing the Hitler card. I always use the word Caucasian because many whites do not fit the blond, blue-eyed Hitler archetype. There have other commentators who come with idiotic statements about Italians, Greeks, the Irish. A Caucasian movement means no blacks/Asians/Jews -easily identified peoples. I don't go believe most of that DNA stuff. Some guy Lee Rogers with the Daily Stormer got his results and he's 0.5% Jewish. This is meaningless. You have to look at parentage. Today with modern medicine, blood transfusions and organ and tissue transplants can alter DNA. Yes, there is a racial aspect to blood. But if your life is in danger and you need these things to survive you will accept them.

    We know that George Lucas, John Derbyshire cannot be a part of any white movements. They have chosen sides and so have their offspring. Derbyshire's Chinese wife and daughter voted for Obama. He's infamous for being fired from National Review for his article about The Talk concerning blacks as friends. Obviously, his wife and daughter ignored him about this. Even though Lucas no longer controls Star Wars, he is happy with the new results. I see no reason for Derbyshire to waste time scribbling.

    You are the problem.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @dfordoom

    Stop .. showing … ANY … Hollywood .. movies to your children … already. Damn, what does it take, people? Stop being naive. Stop trusting that maybe THIS movie or show isn’t so bad. Just stop.
     
    I agree totally but you're wasting your time. They'll keep lining up to give their money to Disney so Disney can make more anti-civilisational movies.

    There's just no way to get through to people that all modern pop culture, including all TV and all Hollywood movies, is not just awful but actively evil.

    And they'll keep exposing their kids to this cultural poison.

    I’m pretty sure you’re trolling, but I’ll bite:

    Let’s start with Netflix’s The Crown. How is it “evil”?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Lana Kane
    "Spice prolonged life and intensified psychic abilities. It was necessary for the Mentats who performed a service called “folding space” (the Holtzman effect) which enabled multi-light year space trips in very little actual time."

    The Guild Navigators (seriously mutated humans) performed the foldspace navigation schtick, and spice was the key to their talent; the mentats were human calculators that performed the functions of (outlawed) electronic computers. I don`t recall that spice was necessary for them to do that, in fact I think Herbert`s main theme in Dune is that humans have vast untapped mental and physical potential that can be released through proper training and the therapeutic use of psychedelic drugs (definitely a reflection of the times in which he was writing; late 60s through the early eighties).

    It`s so sad that I know all of that.

    It`s so sad that I know all of that.

    What’s sad is that so few of the educated know.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Andrei Martyanov

    many films which form the archetypes for many Hollywood plots anyway
     
    Star Wars is a bastardization of Herbert's Dune, from the so called "Force" being a pathetic pseudo-religious derivative of the Weirding Way, as an example, to the whole geopolitical concept. Granted, of course, that Frank Herbert's son, grossly under-talented when compared to his father bastardized Dune sequels and turned them into...Star Wars. No surprise when one of his collaborators is the guy who writes this Star Wars tedious crap. Watching warfare in SW is altogether a very painful tactical and operational experience, the same goes to their combat technology, especially a ground one--I guess this technology was conceived by creators of F-35 and Littoral Combat Ships. Today's Hollywood is a sewer, it is over for them, bar some once in a while gems accidentally produced under the radar of their cultural and social perversion.

    Dune may have influenced SW a bit, but the main influence was an old Japanese movie called The Hidden Fortress: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hidden_Fortress#Influence

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Wow! This long line of blather harkens back to yesteryear in the dorms. ll this needs is all-night bridge games going on in the background and the smell of spilled “Southern Comfort”.

    The current SW trend is pure cultural-Marxism allied with Anarchism, “Trotskyism of the Stars”. Minorities and women would be in control of everything except for the rampant sexism and racism of white male culture. All people are equally capable and thus the inability of women and some minorities to be successful and powerful is due to the evil powers of the “Patriarchy” (The Empire and the allied elitist Jedi Knights). The Empire (modern mass military and industry, maybe Russia) and the Jedi (an educated, disciplined elite, maybe the modern “West”) are both equally enemies that must be destroyed. The character of the Darth One shows that “they” are all “in it together”. The un-educated, un-disciplined, un-organized no-bodies (the “proletariat”) can over-throw all of the ruling elites through spunk and courage. No special skills or intelligence are required.

    The newer SW plot line is all SJW cultural-Marxist fantasy with zoomy special effects. We’d be “Kangs” if the “Man”, or the “Men” (The “System”), were not holding “us” down.

    Perhaps the next SW propaganda issue will deal with the “Cornell Effect”. That phenomenon illustrates the intricate and devious force of patriarchal systemic “racism” that only seems to debilitate American Black students while African & Jamacian Black students “flourish” in the same adversarial force-field. Now that is truely a mystery of the “Force” that will require the entire rainbow to defeat. Maybe there will be protective doses of “spice” to immunize the “faithful feckless” against this insideous patriarical evil.

    Maybe just cases of “Southern Comfort” (and lots of acetaminophen).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In the end, I think that “The Last Jedi” is just a big FUCK YOU from Millenials to Boomers. It is really the only thing that makes sense.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Andrei Martyanov

    Interestingly, they do not even try to make movies based upon Azimov especially
     
    Too smart, too complex. They used to, however, produce wonderful TV Series such as The Twilight Zone and The Outer Limits, even more recent The Fringe was world-class (well, J.J. Abrams, after all). The rest today is a cultural propaganda. Really sad. I am forced, however, to single out: Interstellar, Arrival (with Amy Adams) and, of course, WALL-E as stand alone masterpieces. Even Oblivion was not bad. But they were nowhere near in prominence (with the exception of WALL-E) with such vomit-inducing crap like the Hunger Games or Divergent or Star Wars--you name it. The whole premise of the Hunger Games is altogether--a mindless contrived lunacy. The excellent Snowpiercer is altogether a Korean-Czech movie.

    Too smart, too complex. They used to, however, produce wonderful TV Series such as The Twilight Zone and The Outer Limits

    The Outer Limits was superb. The Twilight Zone on the other hand was non-stop relentless (and incredibly clumsy) liberal propaganda.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RadicalCenter
    Stop .. showing ... ANY ... Hollywood .. movies to your children ... already. Damn, what does it take, people? Stop being naive. Stop trusting that maybe THIS movie or show isn't so bad. Just stop.

    Toss the TV and eschew internet programming and stop financing the brainwashing, perversion and demoralization of your children. Please.

    Stop .. showing … ANY … Hollywood .. movies to your children … already. Damn, what does it take, people? Stop being naive. Stop trusting that maybe THIS movie or show isn’t so bad. Just stop.

    I agree totally but you’re wasting your time. They’ll keep lining up to give their money to Disney so Disney can make more anti-civilisational movies.

    There’s just no way to get through to people that all modern pop culture, including all TV and all Hollywood movies, is not just awful but actively evil.

    And they’ll keep exposing their kids to this cultural poison.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    I'm pretty sure you're trolling, but I'll bite:

    Let's start with Netflix's The Crown. How is it "evil"?
    , @Wyatt Pendleton
    Of course, they will continue to tithe to Hellywood! That is their GOD, their IDOL, their DESTINY!

    The Christian God has been told to go fuck off and die. Man is in charge now. GIVE US BARABBAS! LEAD US INTO TEMPTATION! DRIVEN TO DISTRACTION! WE ARE THE CULT OF PERSONALITY! DO NOT JUDGE US! OUR CHILDREN FOR PLEASURE!

    And if you're a Christian: YOU INTERFERE WITH OUR WORSHIP AND YOU'RE GONNA WISH YOU WERE DEAD.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    Star Wars lobotomized sci-fi genre.

    Classic exchange.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky9-eIlHzAE

    I agree with Simon. I was 10 when the first Star Wars came out. I enjoyed it. I enjoyed the Empire Strikes Back. After that I got older and lost interest.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twodees Partain
    Spice prolonged life and intensified psychic abilities. It was necessary for the Mentats who performed a service called "folding space" (the Holtzman effect) which enabled multi-light year space trips in very little actual time.

    “Spice prolonged life and intensified psychic abilities. It was necessary for the Mentats who performed a service called “folding space” (the Holtzman effect) which enabled multi-light year space trips in very little actual time.”

    The Guild Navigators (seriously mutated humans) performed the foldspace navigation schtick, and spice was the key to their talent; the mentats were human calculators that performed the functions of (outlawed) electronic computers. I don`t recall that spice was necessary for them to do that, in fact I think Herbert`s main theme in Dune is that humans have vast untapped mental and physical potential that can be released through proper training and the therapeutic use of psychedelic drugs (definitely a reflection of the times in which he was writing; late 60s through the early eighties).

    It`s so sad that I know all of that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @HallParvey

    It`s so sad that I know all of that.
     
    What's sad is that so few of the educated know.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    In a way, the New STAR WARS Makes Perfect Sense Given the Change in Ownership from George Lucas to Disney. Force reflects real power.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAtV2KTeR0o

    Richard Spencer in the video above complains about how the New STAR WARS doesn't respect or conform to the original vision created by George Lucas. And many others have lodged similar complaints. Across the political spectrum, many are not pleased with the new series and especially the new movie because it deviates from the original vision that they grew up with. Many adult audience members spent their formative yrs watching the original series, the first three released from 1977 to 1983 and the second trilogy from 1999 to 2005. So, they have a fixed idea of what STAR WARS universe and the Force are about. Therefore, when confronted with the revisions and narrative-thematic purging of the New Series, they are bewildered and even exasperated by Disney's lack of 'respect' for Lucas' original vision. (But do they ever ask why Lucas still deserves respect when he sold his baby to Disney for billions of shekels?)

    Now, the complainers have a point. The new series may well indeed violate the core principles of Lucas' original vision. It may go against the spirit of the original incarnation under Lucas' command. But they are overlooking certain key facts about the Way of Power in culture. What goes for Power goes for the Force. The Force in STAR WARS is whatever those with the possession of copyright say it is. The Force was what it was as long as Lucas had control over it. But with Jews at Disney now owning STAR WARS, the Force is whatever THEY make it out to be. It's as Carl Schmitt said of the nature of law and power. No law exists outside the reality of power. Basic laws are vaguely worded, and it is the Power that decides the meaning and force of those words. So, when Jews gained control of US culture and jurisprudence, the Constitution came to mean Open Borders, Diversity, Anti-White Dogma(to enforce white submissivism necessary to serve Jewish dominance), and 'Gay Marriage'. Americanism and Constitutionalism were always shaped and determined by the Power. After all, what is Free Speech? Jews once used to say Free Speech means all speech, from far right to far left, should be free.Back then, Jews feared censorship of Jewish radicalism and pornography(big profits for Jews) by traditional Christian power. But once Jews gained supreme power in the US, they came to fear Free Speech as criticism of Jewish Power. Therefore, Jews redefined Free Speech as excluding 'hate speech'. Since Jewish Power controls the meaning of 'hate speech', Zionist speech(that demeans Palestinians) is not 'hate speech', but BDS speech that calls for justice for Palestinians must be criminalized as 'hate'. The Power decides what is 'hate', and that means Jewish elites with supreme power in the US get to denounce and suppress certain speech as 'hateful'.

    What goes for Reality goes for Fantasy. The rules of fantasy will always be controlled by those with power over the fantasy. So, it doesn't matter what Lucas did with the original STAR WARS. It doesn't matter how the Force was manifested in the first six movies. The fact is the power of the Force has gone over to Jews at Disney, and that means Jews will alter the Force to suit their agendas and biases. It's simple as that. So, when Richard Spencer and others talk of STAR WARS as a universe existing independent of copyright ownership and moneyed control, they are being naive. They are presuming that there really is a Core Canonical Principles of the STAR WARS and the dynamics of the Force. No, such was all make-believe and can easily be altered based on whomever is now in control.
    Spencer has emphasized over and over how it's foolish to believe in Constitutionalism as a principle independent of power. He has castigated the so-called True Conservatives who claim to stand for abstract American Values of Liberty and Individualism. His point is that American Constitutionalism will always be determined by those with real power. The Constitution can be molded to mean just about anything. At one time, it even justified slavery and the ethnic cleansing of American Indians. And the 'internment' of the Japanese. And censorship of obscene material offensive to Christians. The Constitution allowed all such censorship and restrictions in the past because the White Christian Majority could will the Constitution to support and defend certain values and interests. But once Jews gained control of the Constitution, the US came to be all about ISRAEL FIRST, favoring Zionists over all other peoples(esp the Palestinians), Open Borders Immigration to turn whites into a minority, and etc. The Constitution now serves the interests of Zionist-Supremacism. And since Jews have chosen Homomania as the proxy agent of Jewish Globlaism, the Worship of Homos and Trannies has become the new christianity or Queertianity. The Christian Church is like the Constitution. In the end, it will be what those in power say it's about. The Power decides and molds & twists the presumed core principles to its will.

    If Spencer is so perceptive about the relation between Power and Laws, why is he so naive and earnest in his assessment of the new STAR WARS movie? He seems baffled as to why the new series violated and betrayed what STAR WARS is really supposed to be about. But his idea of 'real Star Wars' only applies to the franchise that was owned by Lucas. As long as Lucas had power over his baby, he could do as he pleased. But when he sold the Force to Disney, Jews had the power over the Force, and they could bend it to serve their own biases and agendas. It's like if you give your kid up for adoption, the adoptive parents can do whatever they want to with it. Jews can adopt a non-Jew and raise it as a Jew. And of course, the new STAR WARS reflects this reality. What are the agendas of Jewish globalists? It is white feminism. Jews use feminism or man-hate to drive a wedge between white men and white women. By thus setting white women against white men, white race is weakened, and it is easier for Jews to maintain control over white goyim. Jews also push race-mixing to destroy racial and ethnic identities. A people with confused identities are less likely to unite and rise up against the ruling elites. It is also a way to demoralize white males and destroy their pride. By especially promoting interracism between black males and white females, Jews send a message that black males are superior studs while white males are either dorky cucks or wussy homos. And the new STAR WARS is geared to turning its white heroine into a race-mixer. We see this all around in TV commercials, TV shows, and movies. Jews want to make the next James Bond black. Jews want to put the black male on the pedestal as the top alpha male who deserves to take white women. As for white males, they are either old farts who should die or dorky cucks who should delight in their own defeat and humiliation.

    Jews also push for massive 'immigration' to increase Diversity. Why do Jews do this? Jewish elites fear a homogeneous population that might unite against Jewish power. So, Jews seek to increase Diversity and set various goyim against one another. That way, the goyim won't be able to unite as one people against Jewish elites. And of course, the new STAR WARS is all about Diversity, a weapon of Jews against native populations of any nation. Meanwhile, virtually all the villains are white, especially white males.

    In the end, the Power decides the meaning of anything. This was true of how Christianity got started. It developed as a branch or heresy of Judaism. Jews denounced Christianity as a violation of the true meaning of God in the Torah and Jewish tradition. How dare these gentiles take something from Jews and change the meanings to make God serve gentiles than Jews? According to the original spirit of the Torah, God cannot be manifest in human form. And God's Covenant is with Jews, not with all of humanity. But Christianity had Jesus as Son of God, a human figure walking among mankind. And Christianity said the new covenant is with all of humanity. In the end, it didn't matter how much Jews protested. The fact is when the idea of God passed over to Christian and later Muslim gentiles, they changed or twisted the principles to serve their own interests and agendas. Jewish concept of God was limited only to spaces in which Jews had the power. In gentile spaces where Christians and Muslims had control over the idea of God, His meaning and design could be altered, even drastically, to serve interests inimical to Jews.

    So, what happened to STAR WARS isn't much different from what happened to the concept of the Jewish God once its ownership passed over to gentiles. Via Christian conversion, many gentiles became believers in God, and this belief gave them ownership of the meaning of God. And in their self-interest, they altered and violated many principles so dear to Jews who had once held sole ownership of their God.
    Likewise, STAR WARS owned by Lucas and beloved by so many people had canonical value only as long as its ownership remained with those who remained loyal to the original vision. But once the ownership changed hands, the New Masters were bound to make the franchise serve their own biases and interests.
    This happens with every newspaper or magazine. It doesn't matter what its original masthead declaration of principles was. The new owners will bend the purpose to their own will. This is why The New Republic changed drastically when it was taken over by Neocons under the tutelage of Martin Peretz. And then, once ownership changed once more, it turned into just some homo-globalist hipster rag. Or consider Huffington Post. Despite its name, Ariana Huffington has nothing to do with the new incarnation, and it's changed considerably from what it had been under her control.

    If Alt Right has gained ownership of STARS WARS franchise, they would have made it serve its vision and interests. Richard Spencer as producer-director of STAR WARS would have made the Empire the good guys, and of course, many fans would have screamed Bloody Murder in protest. It's like Stanley Kubrick did his OWN thing with THE SHINING to the never-ending ire of Stephen King who felt Kubrick betrayed his core concept and meaning. But as King had sold movie rights to Kubrick, he was helpless to stop it.
    Indeed, if there is such a thing as Alt Right STAR WARS fanfiction, the narratives likely serve the biases of White Nationalism. But since Jews of Disney own STAR WARS, the franchise is now used to further the Jewish Supremacist agenda of globalism.

    Same thing happened with dialectical communism. The original theory by Karl Marx prophesied that conditions would worsen to the point where the working class would rise up to overthrow the bourgeoisie. Since the Proletariat was essential to this revolution, only an industrialized nation with a majority prole population could undergo the great tranformation. But when Lenin and Stalin took control of the theory, it was altered so that even a backward semi-industrial nation like Russia could have a communist revolution. Spontaneous uprising by the working class was no longer necessary. A radical vanguard with the support of secret police apparatus could pull it off. Later, Mao altered the meaning of Marxism even more by arguing that a communist revolution could happen with a peasant army. So, despite the original canonical meaning of Marxist theory, in the real world of actual practice, Marxism could be molded to be anything by the powers-that-be. If Maoism said Marxism could prevail in an agricultural society, that was the official lore of the land.And later, when reformers took control of China, communism could mean market economics. So, even as the Chinese Communist Party maintained the symbolism of Mao, the Red Flag, and revolutionary pageantry, the New Way was about buying-and-selling, trade with capitalist powers, and getting rich. Indeed, consider how Che Guevara became linked with capitalist pop culture and hedonism even though he hated Rock music, hippies, and materialism.

    So, if we apply Carl-Schmitt-ian analysis to the new STAR WARS, no one should be surprised that the new owners of the Force changed the meaning to suit their ethno-socio-economic purposes. No school of laws, no work of culture, and no set of principles exist in some pure form in a vacuum. They always exist in a world of people with competing interests and agendas. Indeed, even among Christians, different sects disagree on the meaning of Jesus. In many denominations today, homomaniacs have taken over and insist that the faith is about worshiping homos and trannies. And warmongering patriots believe that Christianity is about the flag and guns. So, expecting the STAR WARS universe to remain pristine or resist heretical ideas is wishful thinking. STAR WARS will be whatever those with ownership of it make it to be.
    It's like the Hagia Sophia Mosque in Istanbul. It was originally built as a Christian Cathedral, but Muslims altered the meaning. At one time, Ottoman Turks even altered the Parthenon to serve as a place of prayer for Muslims. But then, Christians had done the same to Pagan Temples. While Christians destroyed some pagan temples, they altered some to serve Jesus than the pagan gods. If we see STAR WARS as a kind of pop mythology or fanboy church, its core meaning will change to the tune of whoever has control over it. Consider the evolution of the Parthenon depending on who held power over Athens.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGitmYl6U90

    Another complaint oft-heard from the detractors of the new series is that the nature of the Force has change considerably from the original series. They object to how the Force has become so easy with the young heroine. And Spencer wonders how someone with such humble background could have the Force. But, they are forgetting that George Lucas himself kept changing the nature of the Force. In PHANTOM MENACE, he altered the Force from some mysterious essence to something that can be medically detected in blood. And for those who have problems with the young heroine's humble background in the new series, the old series would have us believe that some slave woman could give a miracle virgin birth to some kid who, at the tender age of 7, can win a hyper-drive chariot race and man spaceships and blow up seasoned enemy pilots. So, if a 7 yr old squirt can do all that, is it really so strange to see a young heroine do 'badass' things?

    Also, if a female slave non-entity(in PHANTOM MENACE) could give a miracle birth to some kid with the Force, why is it so surprising that the heroine in the new series could have super-Force despite being born to humble parents? Besides, if the 20th century taught us anything, it was that those from the humblest backgrounds could become giants of history: Stalin, Hitler, Mao, etc.

    As for the heroine's ease with mastering the Force, we need to understand that pop culture reflects the times. When Lucas made STAR WARS, power was still institutionalized. One had to go through the proper institutions/channels or gain access to big industries to be somebody. To be an influential journalist, one had to gain position at CBS or New York Times. To be an influential thinker, one had to have a position at Harvard or be promoted by top publishing companies and the media. To be a famous cultural celebrity, one had to be hired by TV, Hollywood, radio, or music industry. Even though there were alternative venues and underground artists, it was a tough climb to gain any kind of success, at least immediately. And Lucas struggled in this world. For him to gain access to film technology, he had to work hard and long and make the climb. To gain the Force, one had to go through the institutions controlled by high priests.

    But we now live in the internet age. Even a young person in a small town now has access to more news and information than New York Times did in the pre-internet age. When Lucas grew up, it was difficult to see foreign films. Only college towns and big cities showed them, and one had to wait long time to see certain movies. It was nearly impossible for anyone to see something when he wanted.
    Today, even someone living in the boonies can watch all sorts of movies from all parts of the world on the internet. Even a kid has more access to World Cinema than top film scholars did prior to the internet age.
    Also, even kids carry around smartphones that serve not only as phones but as internet screens, cameras, recording devices, and etc. It's like their light sabers.
    Thus, the Force has gone from institutional and individual in our world. Before the internet, someone like PewDiePie and Stefan Molyneux didn't have a chance at celebrity-hood. Institutions would not have given them the platform to express their views or pull their antics. But internet has been the great equalizer. Anyone can reach the world from inside their bedrooms. Some of these 'amateurs' have more fans and viewership than mainstream media do.
    So, the revision of the Force in the new series could very well reflect social change. Young people with interesting ideas, music, opinions, personalities, or shtick no longer have to make the Long March through the Institutions to say their say, gain a fanbase, develop a cult, and even become fabulously rich. Even demented Andrew Anglin has gained legendary anti-hero status because of the internet. Even with the attempts to shut down Daily Stormer, Anglin still has enough Troll Force to mess with the Narrative.

    Alt Right should know this since its rise owes so much to the internet, the great equalizer that has made it possible for oddballs like Mark Dice and Styxhexenhammer666 to get huge followings. This is why Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, and Google-Search are working in tandem with ADL to rig the game and ban certain voices deemed 'hateful', but the nature of the internet favors individuals over institutions. It has democratized the Force, for good or for ill.

    So, given all these changes and developments in society, is it any wonder that the nature of the Force has changed in the new series? Whereas Luke had to go through the institutions to gain his power, Rey doesn't. The Force has been digitalized and democratized.

    Internet and gadgets like smartphones have empowered individuals in ways that were unforeseeable when Lucas conceived STAR WARS. Just consider how the rise of high-tech allowed young ones to become overnight moguls and billionaires. Prior to the internet, could someone like Mark Zuckerberg become so rich so fast?

    Now, I'm not saying LAST JEDI is a good movie. I haven't seen it. I did see FORCE AWAKENS, and it was terrible. But, we should not be surprised that Force will change along with the change in ownership and will reflect social transformations all around us. In the end, most pop culture, even when set in the distant past or fantasy world, are more reflections of prevailing fashions and trends of the moment than works of purity remaining faithful to a set of core principles inside a bubble.

    Internet made even this young woman a celebrity and a known factor in culture:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGEilqBNKwk

    “Richard Spencer in the video above complains about how the New STAR WARS doesn’t respect or conform to the original vision created by George Lucas. And many others have lodged similar complaints. …

    Now, the complainers have a point. The new series may well indeed violate the core principles of Lucas’ original vision. It may go against the spirit of the original incarnation under Lucas’ command.”

    Ideas have consequences. Lucas’ original idea was based on his romanticizing of East Asian religion and pseudo-philosophy. He was using fiction to replace Western civilization, to replace Christian morality and identity, to replace the concept of Christian knight with galactic pagan Jedi. All of which means eventually replacing the people of the civilization.

    This mess is inherent in the original.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • On a separate note, I like that countries such as China and maybe Japan (?) still control which American movies they show and or at least take the most of their profits, I miss the time when each country still had their own movie industry and not all was just Hollywood dumb stuff globally, I mean now all over the world it is only Hollywood movies and even local production becomes just Holliwood-lite, like those recent French movies promoting mudsharking etc, there where nice European movies in the 60s and 70s and now? Just Hollywood-wannabe crap.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twodees Partain
    Spice prolonged life and intensified psychic abilities. It was necessary for the Mentats who performed a service called "folding space" (the Holtzman effect) which enabled multi-light year space trips in very little actual time.

    Thanks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    In a way, the New STAR WARS Makes Perfect Sense Given the Change in Ownership from George Lucas to Disney. Force reflects real power.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAtV2KTeR0o

    Richard Spencer in the video above complains about how the New STAR WARS doesn't respect or conform to the original vision created by George Lucas. And many others have lodged similar complaints. Across the political spectrum, many are not pleased with the new series and especially the new movie because it deviates from the original vision that they grew up with. Many adult audience members spent their formative yrs watching the original series, the first three released from 1977 to 1983 and the second trilogy from 1999 to 2005. So, they have a fixed idea of what STAR WARS universe and the Force are about. Therefore, when confronted with the revisions and narrative-thematic purging of the New Series, they are bewildered and even exasperated by Disney's lack of 'respect' for Lucas' original vision. (But do they ever ask why Lucas still deserves respect when he sold his baby to Disney for billions of shekels?)

    Now, the complainers have a point. The new series may well indeed violate the core principles of Lucas' original vision. It may go against the spirit of the original incarnation under Lucas' command. But they are overlooking certain key facts about the Way of Power in culture. What goes for Power goes for the Force. The Force in STAR WARS is whatever those with the possession of copyright say it is. The Force was what it was as long as Lucas had control over it. But with Jews at Disney now owning STAR WARS, the Force is whatever THEY make it out to be. It's as Carl Schmitt said of the nature of law and power. No law exists outside the reality of power. Basic laws are vaguely worded, and it is the Power that decides the meaning and force of those words. So, when Jews gained control of US culture and jurisprudence, the Constitution came to mean Open Borders, Diversity, Anti-White Dogma(to enforce white submissivism necessary to serve Jewish dominance), and 'Gay Marriage'. Americanism and Constitutionalism were always shaped and determined by the Power. After all, what is Free Speech? Jews once used to say Free Speech means all speech, from far right to far left, should be free.Back then, Jews feared censorship of Jewish radicalism and pornography(big profits for Jews) by traditional Christian power. But once Jews gained supreme power in the US, they came to fear Free Speech as criticism of Jewish Power. Therefore, Jews redefined Free Speech as excluding 'hate speech'. Since Jewish Power controls the meaning of 'hate speech', Zionist speech(that demeans Palestinians) is not 'hate speech', but BDS speech that calls for justice for Palestinians must be criminalized as 'hate'. The Power decides what is 'hate', and that means Jewish elites with supreme power in the US get to denounce and suppress certain speech as 'hateful'.

    What goes for Reality goes for Fantasy. The rules of fantasy will always be controlled by those with power over the fantasy. So, it doesn't matter what Lucas did with the original STAR WARS. It doesn't matter how the Force was manifested in the first six movies. The fact is the power of the Force has gone over to Jews at Disney, and that means Jews will alter the Force to suit their agendas and biases. It's simple as that. So, when Richard Spencer and others talk of STAR WARS as a universe existing independent of copyright ownership and moneyed control, they are being naive. They are presuming that there really is a Core Canonical Principles of the STAR WARS and the dynamics of the Force. No, such was all make-believe and can easily be altered based on whomever is now in control.
    Spencer has emphasized over and over how it's foolish to believe in Constitutionalism as a principle independent of power. He has castigated the so-called True Conservatives who claim to stand for abstract American Values of Liberty and Individualism. His point is that American Constitutionalism will always be determined by those with real power. The Constitution can be molded to mean just about anything. At one time, it even justified slavery and the ethnic cleansing of American Indians. And the 'internment' of the Japanese. And censorship of obscene material offensive to Christians. The Constitution allowed all such censorship and restrictions in the past because the White Christian Majority could will the Constitution to support and defend certain values and interests. But once Jews gained control of the Constitution, the US came to be all about ISRAEL FIRST, favoring Zionists over all other peoples(esp the Palestinians), Open Borders Immigration to turn whites into a minority, and etc. The Constitution now serves the interests of Zionist-Supremacism. And since Jews have chosen Homomania as the proxy agent of Jewish Globlaism, the Worship of Homos and Trannies has become the new christianity or Queertianity. The Christian Church is like the Constitution. In the end, it will be what those in power say it's about. The Power decides and molds & twists the presumed core principles to its will.

    If Spencer is so perceptive about the relation between Power and Laws, why is he so naive and earnest in his assessment of the new STAR WARS movie? He seems baffled as to why the new series violated and betrayed what STAR WARS is really supposed to be about. But his idea of 'real Star Wars' only applies to the franchise that was owned by Lucas. As long as Lucas had power over his baby, he could do as he pleased. But when he sold the Force to Disney, Jews had the power over the Force, and they could bend it to serve their own biases and agendas. It's like if you give your kid up for adoption, the adoptive parents can do whatever they want to with it. Jews can adopt a non-Jew and raise it as a Jew. And of course, the new STAR WARS reflects this reality. What are the agendas of Jewish globalists? It is white feminism. Jews use feminism or man-hate to drive a wedge between white men and white women. By thus setting white women against white men, white race is weakened, and it is easier for Jews to maintain control over white goyim. Jews also push race-mixing to destroy racial and ethnic identities. A people with confused identities are less likely to unite and rise up against the ruling elites. It is also a way to demoralize white males and destroy their pride. By especially promoting interracism between black males and white females, Jews send a message that black males are superior studs while white males are either dorky cucks or wussy homos. And the new STAR WARS is geared to turning its white heroine into a race-mixer. We see this all around in TV commercials, TV shows, and movies. Jews want to make the next James Bond black. Jews want to put the black male on the pedestal as the top alpha male who deserves to take white women. As for white males, they are either old farts who should die or dorky cucks who should delight in their own defeat and humiliation.

    Jews also push for massive 'immigration' to increase Diversity. Why do Jews do this? Jewish elites fear a homogeneous population that might unite against Jewish power. So, Jews seek to increase Diversity and set various goyim against one another. That way, the goyim won't be able to unite as one people against Jewish elites. And of course, the new STAR WARS is all about Diversity, a weapon of Jews against native populations of any nation. Meanwhile, virtually all the villains are white, especially white males.

    In the end, the Power decides the meaning of anything. This was true of how Christianity got started. It developed as a branch or heresy of Judaism. Jews denounced Christianity as a violation of the true meaning of God in the Torah and Jewish tradition. How dare these gentiles take something from Jews and change the meanings to make God serve gentiles than Jews? According to the original spirit of the Torah, God cannot be manifest in human form. And God's Covenant is with Jews, not with all of humanity. But Christianity had Jesus as Son of God, a human figure walking among mankind. And Christianity said the new covenant is with all of humanity. In the end, it didn't matter how much Jews protested. The fact is when the idea of God passed over to Christian and later Muslim gentiles, they changed or twisted the principles to serve their own interests and agendas. Jewish concept of God was limited only to spaces in which Jews had the power. In gentile spaces where Christians and Muslims had control over the idea of God, His meaning and design could be altered, even drastically, to serve interests inimical to Jews.

    So, what happened to STAR WARS isn't much different from what happened to the concept of the Jewish God once its ownership passed over to gentiles. Via Christian conversion, many gentiles became believers in God, and this belief gave them ownership of the meaning of God. And in their self-interest, they altered and violated many principles so dear to Jews who had once held sole ownership of their God.
    Likewise, STAR WARS owned by Lucas and beloved by so many people had canonical value only as long as its ownership remained with those who remained loyal to the original vision. But once the ownership changed hands, the New Masters were bound to make the franchise serve their own biases and interests.
    This happens with every newspaper or magazine. It doesn't matter what its original masthead declaration of principles was. The new owners will bend the purpose to their own will. This is why The New Republic changed drastically when it was taken over by Neocons under the tutelage of Martin Peretz. And then, once ownership changed once more, it turned into just some homo-globalist hipster rag. Or consider Huffington Post. Despite its name, Ariana Huffington has nothing to do with the new incarnation, and it's changed considerably from what it had been under her control.

    If Alt Right has gained ownership of STARS WARS franchise, they would have made it serve its vision and interests. Richard Spencer as producer-director of STAR WARS would have made the Empire the good guys, and of course, many fans would have screamed Bloody Murder in protest. It's like Stanley Kubrick did his OWN thing with THE SHINING to the never-ending ire of Stephen King who felt Kubrick betrayed his core concept and meaning. But as King had sold movie rights to Kubrick, he was helpless to stop it.
    Indeed, if there is such a thing as Alt Right STAR WARS fanfiction, the narratives likely serve the biases of White Nationalism. But since Jews of Disney own STAR WARS, the franchise is now used to further the Jewish Supremacist agenda of globalism.

    Same thing happened with dialectical communism. The original theory by Karl Marx prophesied that conditions would worsen to the point where the working class would rise up to overthrow the bourgeoisie. Since the Proletariat was essential to this revolution, only an industrialized nation with a majority prole population could undergo the great tranformation. But when Lenin and Stalin took control of the theory, it was altered so that even a backward semi-industrial nation like Russia could have a communist revolution. Spontaneous uprising by the working class was no longer necessary. A radical vanguard with the support of secret police apparatus could pull it off. Later, Mao altered the meaning of Marxism even more by arguing that a communist revolution could happen with a peasant army. So, despite the original canonical meaning of Marxist theory, in the real world of actual practice, Marxism could be molded to be anything by the powers-that-be. If Maoism said Marxism could prevail in an agricultural society, that was the official lore of the land.And later, when reformers took control of China, communism could mean market economics. So, even as the Chinese Communist Party maintained the symbolism of Mao, the Red Flag, and revolutionary pageantry, the New Way was about buying-and-selling, trade with capitalist powers, and getting rich. Indeed, consider how Che Guevara became linked with capitalist pop culture and hedonism even though he hated Rock music, hippies, and materialism.

    So, if we apply Carl-Schmitt-ian analysis to the new STAR WARS, no one should be surprised that the new owners of the Force changed the meaning to suit their ethno-socio-economic purposes. No school of laws, no work of culture, and no set of principles exist in some pure form in a vacuum. They always exist in a world of people with competing interests and agendas. Indeed, even among Christians, different sects disagree on the meaning of Jesus. In many denominations today, homomaniacs have taken over and insist that the faith is about worshiping homos and trannies. And warmongering patriots believe that Christianity is about the flag and guns. So, expecting the STAR WARS universe to remain pristine or resist heretical ideas is wishful thinking. STAR WARS will be whatever those with ownership of it make it to be.
    It's like the Hagia Sophia Mosque in Istanbul. It was originally built as a Christian Cathedral, but Muslims altered the meaning. At one time, Ottoman Turks even altered the Parthenon to serve as a place of prayer for Muslims. But then, Christians had done the same to Pagan Temples. While Christians destroyed some pagan temples, they altered some to serve Jesus than the pagan gods. If we see STAR WARS as a kind of pop mythology or fanboy church, its core meaning will change to the tune of whoever has control over it. Consider the evolution of the Parthenon depending on who held power over Athens.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGitmYl6U90

    Another complaint oft-heard from the detractors of the new series is that the nature of the Force has change considerably from the original series. They object to how the Force has become so easy with the young heroine. And Spencer wonders how someone with such humble background could have the Force. But, they are forgetting that George Lucas himself kept changing the nature of the Force. In PHANTOM MENACE, he altered the Force from some mysterious essence to something that can be medically detected in blood. And for those who have problems with the young heroine's humble background in the new series, the old series would have us believe that some slave woman could give a miracle virgin birth to some kid who, at the tender age of 7, can win a hyper-drive chariot race and man spaceships and blow up seasoned enemy pilots. So, if a 7 yr old squirt can do all that, is it really so strange to see a young heroine do 'badass' things?

    Also, if a female slave non-entity(in PHANTOM MENACE) could give a miracle birth to some kid with the Force, why is it so surprising that the heroine in the new series could have super-Force despite being born to humble parents? Besides, if the 20th century taught us anything, it was that those from the humblest backgrounds could become giants of history: Stalin, Hitler, Mao, etc.

    As for the heroine's ease with mastering the Force, we need to understand that pop culture reflects the times. When Lucas made STAR WARS, power was still institutionalized. One had to go through the proper institutions/channels or gain access to big industries to be somebody. To be an influential journalist, one had to gain position at CBS or New York Times. To be an influential thinker, one had to have a position at Harvard or be promoted by top publishing companies and the media. To be a famous cultural celebrity, one had to be hired by TV, Hollywood, radio, or music industry. Even though there were alternative venues and underground artists, it was a tough climb to gain any kind of success, at least immediately. And Lucas struggled in this world. For him to gain access to film technology, he had to work hard and long and make the climb. To gain the Force, one had to go through the institutions controlled by high priests.

    But we now live in the internet age. Even a young person in a small town now has access to more news and information than New York Times did in the pre-internet age. When Lucas grew up, it was difficult to see foreign films. Only college towns and big cities showed them, and one had to wait long time to see certain movies. It was nearly impossible for anyone to see something when he wanted.
    Today, even someone living in the boonies can watch all sorts of movies from all parts of the world on the internet. Even a kid has more access to World Cinema than top film scholars did prior to the internet age.
    Also, even kids carry around smartphones that serve not only as phones but as internet screens, cameras, recording devices, and etc. It's like their light sabers.
    Thus, the Force has gone from institutional and individual in our world. Before the internet, someone like PewDiePie and Stefan Molyneux didn't have a chance at celebrity-hood. Institutions would not have given them the platform to express their views or pull their antics. But internet has been the great equalizer. Anyone can reach the world from inside their bedrooms. Some of these 'amateurs' have more fans and viewership than mainstream media do.
    So, the revision of the Force in the new series could very well reflect social change. Young people with interesting ideas, music, opinions, personalities, or shtick no longer have to make the Long March through the Institutions to say their say, gain a fanbase, develop a cult, and even become fabulously rich. Even demented Andrew Anglin has gained legendary anti-hero status because of the internet. Even with the attempts to shut down Daily Stormer, Anglin still has enough Troll Force to mess with the Narrative.

    Alt Right should know this since its rise owes so much to the internet, the great equalizer that has made it possible for oddballs like Mark Dice and Styxhexenhammer666 to get huge followings. This is why Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, and Google-Search are working in tandem with ADL to rig the game and ban certain voices deemed 'hateful', but the nature of the internet favors individuals over institutions. It has democratized the Force, for good or for ill.

    So, given all these changes and developments in society, is it any wonder that the nature of the Force has changed in the new series? Whereas Luke had to go through the institutions to gain his power, Rey doesn't. The Force has been digitalized and democratized.

    Internet and gadgets like smartphones have empowered individuals in ways that were unforeseeable when Lucas conceived STAR WARS. Just consider how the rise of high-tech allowed young ones to become overnight moguls and billionaires. Prior to the internet, could someone like Mark Zuckerberg become so rich so fast?

    Now, I'm not saying LAST JEDI is a good movie. I haven't seen it. I did see FORCE AWAKENS, and it was terrible. But, we should not be surprised that Force will change along with the change in ownership and will reflect social transformations all around us. In the end, most pop culture, even when set in the distant past or fantasy world, are more reflections of prevailing fashions and trends of the moment than works of purity remaining faithful to a set of core principles inside a bubble.

    Internet made even this young woman a celebrity and a known factor in culture:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGEilqBNKwk

    Yeah, you obviously have no real understanding about the environment of 1st century Judaism and the rise of Christianity or even Islam (not that I have any deep knowledge about the later).

    First, it was the Jewish apostles who reached out to the gentiles and proclaimed that God’s kingdom was not synonymous with the ethnic nation of Israel. Even the most ardent skeptics typically won’t deny that it was the Jewish Paul who spearheaded spreading Christianity to the gentiles and accepting them as equals alongside Jewish converts. Apart from this, first century Judaism and parts of the Old Testament like Isaiah already had the concept that the reign of the Messiah would somehow benefit all peoples in the world. The church fathers and new testament authors emphasized continuity with the old testament not dismissive hand waving, or contemptuous subversion. Trying to liken the gospel message, which the apostles were willing to die for, with a corporate buyout is a bizarre.

    Likewise somehow insisting that Disney’s ability to make new stories using their interpretation of “the force” resembles the rise of Christianity is odd to say the least. Cultural and religious groups are often self-selected and typically self-perpetuating. The Christian, Jewish, and Islamic traditions all coexisted and continue to coexist because their adherents believed their faith contained the absolute revelation of truth. Now the dominant group could of course broadcast their interpretations in art, government, etc. but that didn’t prevent the other interpretations from existing. and of course, truth, meaning what actually corresponds with reality, exists independent of interpretation and cultural force. The contentions that Christ merely died as a man, rose as the Son of God, or did not die at all conflict and only one can be correct, in the sense that only one can be an accurate description of what happened in history.

    On a side note, I can’t help but object to some right-wingers attempts at conflating modern secular Jews with the Jews of ancient times. Acknowledging that modern secular Jews are behind a lot of subversive movements, the same cannot be said of 1st century Jews. Like it or not, it was the pagan Greco-Roman world that was all for pedophilia, homosexuality, abortion, and occasionally female empowerment (the last one is debatable but one can still find more feminist precursors in Rome than the old testament). Of course it is now Christianity that fights against these forces and secular Jews that support them, illustrating that it is the Christian church that carries on as the spiritual children of Abraham, as the New Testament and church fathers insisted.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Expletive Deleted
    You and I might well fall out.
    His father, and my mother, are some kind of cousin. Althought the titles went extinct in the '70s, they were close friends of Edward and the American Woman, and lost favour after the War due to fashy opinions and lack of heirs (made the Kents look like hippies).
    Young Stef there is I think more of the Calais/Irish line, rather than Sefton (& Croxteth), but it's still, what, 952 years since they sauntered into the island?

    By the way, he looks right, nasty goat beard and baldy head and all. All my male (and possibly some female ..) cousins on that side have 'that look'.
    Who gives a flying fuck who his mam was? Azure a cross moline or. Women count for nothing, and the sooner you understand that, the happier you'll die.
    .

    Expletive Deleted: This is a half-arsed, @✴#ed up comment. But your relation to (((Molyneux))) is a reason for this illogical writing. His mammy matters because Jewishness is matrilineal. He did go to Christian schools, but he Joooooy through and through. “Women count for nothing…,” tell that to your mammy, or any women in your life (if you dare).

    As usual, I quote facts and I get emotional, cuck drivel in return.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @AndrewR
    Mark Hamill is 66 years old and almost certainly worth at least $50,000,000 and likely at least double that, so I admit I am baffled as to why he cucked so hard with that groveling apology. I hope someone explains it to me before I lose all respect for him.

    I hope someone explains it to me before I lose all respect for him.

    https://screenrant.com/mark-hamill-kids-star-wars-cameos/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @German_reader

    But the Galactic Empire did feel the need to retain some trappings of the old Republic like the Senate
     
    That's because it obviously was modelled on ancient Rome, not imperial Germany.

    Fair enough, it’s not a perfect parallel. But the resolution of the Civil War seems clearly patterned after Versailles.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @AndrewR
    Mark Hamill is 66 years old and almost certainly worth at least $50,000,000 and likely at least double that, so I admit I am baffled as to why he cucked so hard with that groveling apology. I hope someone explains it to me before I lose all respect for him.

    Probably because Disney twisted his arm big time, I’ll bet. They stand to lose money due to his public criticism. It wouldn’t be difficult for a group of well-connected Hollywood people to ruin a guy like Hamill if they wanted to – leak embarrassing information about him to the press, have tabloids smear him, have SJW movie critics and media figures call him racist/sexist, pull some strings and get some of his projects publicly pulled, make the guy unemployable, make his relatives and friends suffer professionally if they are in the business….basically, the kinds of things Weinstein was accused of doing to his victims. Hamill has good reasons to shut up, which is why I don’t mind a little SJWism from guys like him. Sometimes, you gotta say what you gotta say in that PC industry.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Mark Hamill is 66 years old and almost certainly worth at least $50,000,000 and likely at least double that, so I admit I am baffled as to why he cucked so hard with that groveling apology. I hope someone explains it to me before I lose all respect for him.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Probably because Disney twisted his arm big time, I'll bet. They stand to lose money due to his public criticism. It wouldn't be difficult for a group of well-connected Hollywood people to ruin a guy like Hamill if they wanted to - leak embarrassing information about him to the press, have tabloids smear him, have SJW movie critics and media figures call him racist/sexist, pull some strings and get some of his projects publicly pulled, make the guy unemployable, make his relatives and friends suffer professionally if they are in the business....basically, the kinds of things Weinstein was accused of doing to his victims. Hamill has good reasons to shut up, which is why I don't mind a little SJWism from guys like him. Sometimes, you gotta say what you gotta say in that PC industry.
    , @geokat62

    I hope someone explains it to me before I lose all respect for him.
     
    https://screenrant.com/mark-hamill-kids-star-wars-cameos/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Alden
    The movie industry doesn’t depend on the American box office at all. It makes it’s money in the international market.

    That’s hundreds of millions of low paid third world men who just love the special effects , cartoonish explosions, car chases and all the rest.

    Plus it’s an industry where everybody gets paid long before the movies are finished and on the market.

    “The movie industry doesn’t depend on the American box office at all. It makes it’s money in the international market.”

    Not really. The US is a critical market. Just because a movie makes lots of money overseas doesn’t mean that it makes a lot of profit. If an expensive Western movie tanks in the North American market, there is a good chance that it will make little or no profit despite how it does overseas.

    Take the World of Warcraft movie; it tanked in the US but made $200M in China, so you’d think by looking at it that the studio would be rushing out a sequel. But they’re not. Why? Because Chinese theatre chains take about 75% of the haul (compared with just 50% in the US), meaning that $200M is closer to $50M. Coupled with the fact that sequels have a tendency to make less and there is no profit to making an expensive CGI-laden sequel.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I could not care less about Star Wars. But someone is spending big buck$ spreading the hype because Star Wars has saturated the cultural landscape. From bus shelter ads and billboards to drink specials and theme nights at bars to dozens of articles and “think pieces” extolling its virtues – it is absolutely fucking everywhere. Almost all my friends, family, co-workers and even random interlocutors have “spontaneously” mentioned SW recently.

    First rule of propaganda: repetition, repetition, repetition. 21st century twist: plugged into a portable digital device all day = hypnotized and mind fucked right out in the open unaware that a message has been implanted by the Media Infotainment Complex. From RussiaDidIt to #SaveAleppo to some stupid movie…under the radar, past the distracted gatekeeper and into your mind. Brainwashing…it’s real and it works. Advertising alone is a $400 billion a year industry. IOW, it works as intended even if you think you are immune to its effects. You are not immune.

    Some of these diversity and/or movie critics are borderline paranoid cases who over egg the pudding at times but there is definitely a trend of belittling the male and the white in Media Infotainment Complex produced and mediated content. Fantasies of an SJW ruled nation will end in tears and bloodshed. Ditto the “white” version of the zero sum identity game. You are being played for fools by venal and corrupt psychopaths.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Z-man
    Walt Disney is tuning in his grave.

    turning

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Now Star Wars Episode VIII (The Last Jedi), released in mid-December to resounding applause from Main Stream Media reviewers is tanking, well behind the 2015 Star Wars movie

    Anecdote: I heard the tail end of NPR film critics reviewing this new film and one of them a woman who I assume was a Jewess give the actor that played the evil jedi character rave reviews, lol, one Jew helping another.
    My son, a Star Wars fan, went to see this movie and he thought it sucked. ‘Nuff Said’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @KenH
    I lost interest halfway through the first Stars Wars movie remake. The racial and political overtones were obvious as was the message that the rainbow invariably triumphs over whiteness. Like most movies it's more psychological warfare against whites and multicult propaganda dressed up as entertainment.

    Try looking at recent King Arthur movies.

    Types everywhere that were never involved originally.

    Dumb blacks in shiny helmets and wielding Excalibur type swords is pure comedy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Walt Disney is tuning in his grave.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Z-man
    turning
    , @Gene Su
    I heard that Disney might adapt the Tripod trilogy in the near future (White Mountains, City of Lead and Gold, Pool of Fire). I hope that they don't mess that up. In particular, the protagonists are supposed to be 3 European white boys. I hope they don't change that. I note that that fine piece of literature was written by a Brit, not an American.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous

    So, what happened to STAR WARS isn’t much different from what happened to the concept of the Jewish God once its ownership passed over to gentiles. Via Christian conversion, many gentiles became believers in God, and this belief gave them ownership of the meaning of God. And in their self-interest, they altered and violated many principles so dear to Jews who had once held sole ownership of their God.
     
    Holding up the (Jewish) Disney corporation acquisition of (Gentile) George Lucas's SW property as an example of the same process as the formation of the (Gentile) Christian heritage on the mouldering bones of the Hebraic (Jewish) tradition reads like a sort of Satanic inversion.

    Holding up the (Jewish) Disney corporation acquisition of (Gentile) George Lucas’s SW property as an example of the same process as the formation of the (Gentile) Christian heritage on the mouldering bones of the Hebraic (Jewish) tradition reads like a sort of Satanic inversion.

    The new STAR WARS or STAR SCHWARZ made things much worse, but Lucas ruined it long long ago. He came up with a great vision but emotionally grew backward and made the Saga about nothing but toys, special effects, and pandering to kids. Despite their faults, STAR WARS and EMPIRE worked as storytelling and set up a great finale. Luke vs Darth. But RETURN OF JEDI was filled with fish-headed generals and jungle teddy bears. Also, Lucas had the tendency to combine naive infantilism with quasi-tendentious sermonizing. So, he said that Ewoks were like the Viet Cong because US, the great industrial power, was defeated by jungle warriors of Vietnam. But this is silly. The battle takes place in a single afternoon in RETURN and just a handful of Ewoks die. In contrast, Vietnam War lasted for 8 yrs(officially and unofficially even longer), and at least 2 million Viets died and many got wounded. Also, the viets were not a hunter-gatherer tribe with stone age weapons but armed and supplied by the OTHER GREAT INDUSTRIAL Power, the Soviets. But Lucas gave us teddy bears in space and then made some bogus pompous political statements, like he is Colonel Kurtz in APOCALYPSE NOW or something. It was funny seeing a man getting sillier and more serious at the same time. And the whole STAR WARS is like that. In some ways, it gets darker and more ‘complicated’. We discover Darth is really pa of Luke, and Luke is tempted to the Dark Side. And the prequels say something about how democracy can turn into tyranny. And yet, at the center of the narrative is just a lot of hokum and kiddie stuff. STAR WARS could have been EXCALIBUR IN SPACE but it just became a big pinball machine.

    That STAR WARS got Jewishized into STAR SCHWARZ is interesting given that the core inspiration of the STAR WARS universe is pagan. Even though Lucas drew some ideas from the Bible and Judeo-Christian tradition, it owes more to paganism of Greco-Roman mythology, Germanic mythology, Japanese samurai cult & Kurosawa films, Arthurian legends, the Western, and 20th century Fascist-Nazi aesthetics. It was about the brotherhood of knighthood, the cult of the warrior.
    And of course, STAR SCHWARZ continues in that vein. It still owes more to paganist inspirations than anything in the Bible. And yet, why is it Jewishy? Because there are many aspects to Jewishness. There is core Jewishness of religion and heritage. But there is also the Pawnbroker Jewishness, the art of merchantry where Jews take control of pagan/gentile icons & idols and use/exploit them to serve the Jewish agenda. It’s like a Jewish pawnbroker wasn’t a collector of only Jewish stuff. He gained ownership of tons of goy, pagan, gentile stuff. He used them for profits or props to push Jewish interests.
    In our world, Jews promote Diversity and Interracism on whites. Diversity weakens white unity and white power. Interracism destroys white male pride, thus whites become cucked. So, even though STAR SCHWARZ is still paganist, those paganist altars have been altered to favor the political and ideological agenda of Jewish Globalist Power. This is also true of homomania. The history of homo cult is paganist. It was biggest among pagan Greeks and decadent Romans. And some pagan tribes were tolerant of homo stuff. Samurai could bugger one another sometimes. In contrast, Jewish history was anti-homo. So, how did Jews, even religious Jews, become such promoters of Homomania? Because this paganism can be used by Jews to weaken gentiles. By promoting Homos as wonderful elites, society normalizes the notion of the minority ruling elite. Also, by weakening the moral core of Christians by making churches adopt homomania, Christians no longer have true moral pride. Any people who worship homo fecal penetration as holy cannot be truly moral. They are degenerates whose moral righteousness depends on hype, hysteria, and propaganda than moral depth or meaning.

    Jews tend to be monomaniacal and seek world dominance, and there have been three ways of going about achieving this. (1) Sticking to Jewish tradition and the Covenant. Keeping strict barriers between holy Jews and filthy goyim. This school of thought said if Jews remain clean and serve God, God will take care of things and favor Jews, and Jews will inherit the earth. (2) Creating a new universal idea(as outgrowth of tribal Jewishness) and spreading that idea to destroy all other ideas. Christianity and Communism were such Jewish ideas. The ideal of Christianity that began as Jewish heresy is to convert the whole world to Jesus and to destroy all other ideas. Paganisms of all kinds must be destroyed. Non-believers are heathens and must be converted or condemned. Communism was a secular kind of Christianity. Supposedly, Marx figured everything out, and only communism was the truth, and all other ideas had to be destroyed or exterminated. The whole world must be made communist. One idea for all mankind.

    The problem of (1) was that extreme tribalism didn’t do much for Jews in terms of power. NO matter how pure they were remained in blood and no matter how much they remained faithful to God, Jews didn’t inherit the world. As for (2), even though those ideas began as Jewish ideas, gentiles eventually took control of them, and Jews got burned. Christians began to persecute Jews. And communism eventually suppressed Jewish identity. And then, even Jewish communists came to be suspected and marginalized as untrustworthy.

    But there was (3) way. By this way, Jews would accept the existence of pagan/gentile ideas. Jews would accept the poly-ideastic way of the world. Unlike (1) Jews, the (3) Jews would extensively engage with the gentile world. But unlike (2) Jews, they would not try to conquer the world with one idea, like Christianity or Communism. Rather, they would allow various ideas/interests to exist BUT have those ideas/interests serve the Higher and Greater ideas/interests of Jews. It’s like the Roman Empire. It allowed non-Romans to keep their cultures and etc. But the Empire also insisted that non-Romans all serve Roman agendas and interests in the end. Instead of universalism where everyone has the same ideas, icons, and idols, it’d be a poly-versal empire where various peoples would stick to their ideas, icons, and idols that, however, would be manipulated to serve the Higher Idea. So, Jews adopted a kind of neo-paganism for their own purposes. In pagan cosmology, there are various gods, but there is also the top god, and the lower gods serve the top god. Jewish manipulation of neo-paganism had non-Jews as lesser gods serving Jews as the top gods. This way, pagans/gentiles could have their own identities and cultures… but they would ultimately bow down to the higher identity and culture of Jews.

    And we see this with how STAR WARS became STAR SCHWARZ. It is still very pagan and steeped in the Carl-Jung-Joseph-Campbell thing, but it now favors feminism, jungle fever, Diversity, and etc to occupy what were essentially roles defined by European pagans. But we see the same thing with BBC. British and European histories are retconned to push the Jewish agenda of Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs with Jungle Fever for white women and cuckery for white men. Hollywood Jews said the next James Bond will be a Negro.
    The great western heroes, Lancelot and Achilles, have been made black in BBC and TV shows. So, even as Jews maintain the pagan idols, they change the cast to push the Jewish agenda of perpetuating white submissivism so that whites will forever lose white pride and identity. A people without pride become mental slaves and serve OTHER peoples.

    Communism and Christianity(and Islam) were mono-imperial systems. Ideally, all of humanity should come under the One True Idea, and all men must struggle for the exact same principles and goals. Both have roots in Jewish culture because Jews developed the notion of the One God and One Truth, with all other gods deserving to be either holocausted or denied their validity/existence.

    In contrast, there was the poly-imperial systems. It attempted to conquer as many lands and people as possible. But it didn’t believe there was one true idea for all. It was more about power and control than conversion. So, other peoples, the conquered subjects, could believe in their own gods, stick with their own traditions/values, and worship their own idols. However, they had to accept the Imperial Rulers as the top power. They had to pay taxes to the top power. They had to bow down to the military might of the top power. Romans were like this,and the Romans managed well with most pagan folks. But they had the most problem with Jews because, unlike pagans, Jews believed their God was the only true God. So, Romans had the stronger military and greater material power, but Jews had the stronger idea, greater spiritual might, and farther-reaching prophetic vision. Romans could win with arms, but Jews could win with vision. But to win, Jews had to develop an idea that could win over the hearts of gentiles/pagans. And that was Christianity. In a way, the spread of Christianity was a great triumph of the Jewish idea over gentiles. But because most Jews didn’t take to the new faith and stuck with their own original concept, the Jewish Heresy turned on them. So, Christianity was both the biggest triumph and tragedy for Jews. Communism would turn out similarly. Jews won big and lost big with it.

    So, what is the best way for Jews to win? Self-enclosed tribalism won’t get anywhere. Jews must engage with the whole world that is goyim. Should Jews come up with a universal idea for all mankind? But then, gentiles will eventually come to own the idea and use it for their own interests, and this might hurt Jews.
    Given those odds, the best way is for Jews to make peace with gentile ideas, icons, and interests but find some way to make them serve Jewish identity, ideas, and interests as the highest and greatest there is. It’s like how Jews work with Evangelicals. Jews are okay with the born-again folks worshiping Jesus and etc, BUT much of Evangelicalism is now ‘muh Israel, muh Israel, muh Israel’. Jews work well with Mormons, but Mormons are all about ‘muh Israel, muh Israel, muh Israel’. So, Jews are okay with Mormons being Mormons BUT Mormons better still put Jewish interests above Mormon interests. It’s like Romans were okay with Syrians and Britons, but those conquered folks still had to obey Roman power before their own. Even as Romans didn’t erase other people’s cultures and idols, those had to be made subservient to Roman culture and idols as the highest there are.
    And modern Jews adopted this, esp from Anglos, the modern folks who come closest to being like the Romans of old. So, the US is now about diversity and how different folks can have their own cultures, identities, and narratives… BUT they better put ‘muh Israel’ before anything. Jews don’t have to attend meetings for Russian, Iranian, Chinese, Mexican, African, etc interests BUT all gentile politicians have to attend AIPAC to praise ‘muh Israel’. Look at that whore Nikki Haley, the semi-person-of-dot.

    The COEN movie HAIL CAESAR offers a useful glimpse into this Jewish agenda. Like some other Coen movies, it is pretty mocking of Christianity as a religion that controls the goyim. Even though goyim have used Christianity to oppress Jews, it also tames goyim and turns them into saps who can be manipulated by Jews.
    Some people think Coens are respectful of Christianity. They are not. What they are interested in is the psycho-politics of Christianity, and in this, they share something with Steven Spielberg who has adopted Catholicist and Evangelical tropes to push his vision of Pop Jewishism on the world.

    In a scene in HAIL CAESAR we see a Rabbi who is offended by what Christian clergy has to say. Even though Jews have been anti-Christian, there’s a kind of paradox. Jews have been so anti-Christian because they are so Christoid, conviction that Jewish individuals could become like Christ. The main problem that Jews have with Christianity is it deified the prophet and messiah into Son of God or even God. The Jewish idea of the Messiah was a great prophet, warrior, messenger. Jews never conceived of messiah as God or even Son of God. Jewish concept of the messiah is empowering because the messiah is a prophet, and a man can be a prophet. So, by the Jewish concept of the messiah, any Jewish man can, at least theoretically, be a messiah since he could be the great prophet. In contrast, Christianity says the messiah is not a prophet but the Son of God or God Himself. And that means there is no more Future. The Truth has been revealed through Jesus the Son of God, and humanity has no more need for prophets. After Jesus, there can only be saints. Saints are different from prophets. Saints don’t have the great vision. They just have the pure faith in God and Jesus. Their duty is to be angelic and devoted. They are not seers of the Future since the Truth has already been revealed. Thus, Christianity destroyed the prophetic tradition. It allowed for many saints but no prophets. In contrast, Jews never gave up on the notion of the prophet. Since the messiah has yet to come and since a man can be a prophet and since a prophet can be the messiah, any Jewish man can, at least theoretically, be the prophet-messiah.

    In some ways, Christianity is more hubristic than Judaism, but in some ways, it is more humble. It is more hubristic in the notion that a Man who walks on Earth can be the Son of God, even God. To Jews, this was pure blasphemy, an affront to God.
    And yet, precisely because Jesus wasn’t just a great prophet but Son of God or God as the Messiah, no other man can ever come anywhere near Him or be like Him. He is the ONLY Man who could be the Messiah since Christianity says Messiah = Son of God = God.

    In contrast, Judaism can be said to be more humble because it says no man can be the Son of God or God. God is too great and doesn’t manifest Himself in human form. And yet, because the Jewish concept of the Messiah is a prophet, any Jew could conceivably be him. Granted, the Messiah could be like an angel sent from Heaven. Even so, he is still not Son of God or God. He is still closer to man if not a man. Since Jews defined the Messiah in this manner, each Jew is instilled with propheticism which is far more ambitious and egoistic than sainthood, which is about devotion and faith. A prophet is humble before God but confident of his vision as the messenger of God. In contrast, a saint is not about the power of mind and vision but goodness of the heart and faith. It’s a bit sappy.

    In the conference with rabbi and Christian clergy in HAIL CAESAR, the rabbi says God cannot be shown in Jewish culture. And in the movie, we are not shown the face of Jesus in the movie-within-the-movie. But we see a lot of the Roman soldier. And we see the shabbos goy gentile studio boss, but we are never shown his Jewish boss Schenk who is like a godly presence. Both the Roman soldier(George Clooney) and the goy studio boss have two modes of behavior: soldier and saint. As soldier, he is rough and aggressive. But when faced with the greater prophetic power of Jesus, he goes into saint mode with sappy face. And the goy studio boss is the same way. He can be tough and push actors around. He whips the crew to get the job done. He is warrior-like in that mode. But he is deeply respectful to his boss Schenk who is like a divine prophet to him.(Schenk is like the Jewish prophet of capitalism; Marcuse is like Jewish prophet of communism; Hollywood is divided between two modes.) Schenk apparently has the vision whereas his shabbos goy underling can manage things but lacks the big vision. After all, Jews invented Hollywood, the empire of dreams where gentile-pagan idols and icons came to be reshaped to serve the Jewish Empire.

    HAIL CAESAR is a rather confused movie because its allusions are often double-or-triple-in-meaning. There is Scarlett Johansson as Rhinemaiden of Wagner’s mythology. But she is swallowed up by what? Whale that swallowed Jonah? This Jewish whale also swallows the gold and then its blowhole ejaculates like Harvey Weinstein’s pud. But later, this woman is like a perverse allusion to the Madonna. She is pregnant with a child from a uncertain father and she ends up marrying a guy named Joe, like Mary was married to Joseph. So,a character is alluded to both Germanic mythology and the Biblical story. Weird. And later a Soviet submarine emerges like the whale. I guess Sovietism is like the other Jewish creation. Whale of communism vs Whale of capitalism, both trying to devour the wealth of the world as a good or an evil. But the guy loses the money in the water cuz of the dog(like the dog that messed up the heist in THE KILLING by Kubrick). It’s a very confused movie, but also a very inspired and interesting one. I can understand why it flopped at the box office. Though a comedy, there’s a lot more going on there which is esoteric.

    Anyway, the movie is onto something. We tend to see history in terms of Jews vs Christianity but it’s more like Future Christoidism vs Been-there-done-there-Christianism.
    Christianity says the Christ was among us, and He was Son of God, thus God, and we all need to be saints with sappy faces like when George Clooney looks at Jesus who offers him water.
    In contrast, Jews believe the Future is filled with new christoids with prophetic vision. Jews accept Jesus as prophet but not messiah. So, Christ was only a prophet, and that means there can be future christs or christoids… like Marx, Rand, Marcuse, etc. And the 20th century has been filled with Jewish prophets and would-be prophets. And this has been a source of great power for Jews. In the end, the stronger idea gains dominance over weaker ones. And the fact is the prophet is more powerful than the saint. Saint is a pawn on the chess board whereas the prophet is the rook or queen. Saint blindly and sappily serves and obeys the king. The queen and rook serve the king too but have their own agency and greater reach in movement.

    Because Jews are still in prophetic mode whereas Christians are in saint mode, the globalist empire has the weaker saintly ideas of gentiles serving the stronger prophetic ideas of Jews.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    You seem bound and determined to prove out the value of the latter half of Chesterton’s observation that “the whole truth is generally the ally of virtue; a half-truth is always the ally of some vice.”
    , @Che Guava
    lo Priss.

    Interesting comment, as always.

    For the OT, tale of Lot.

    For now, Israelis are at the centre of world trade in MDA and MDMA. and the soldiiers takiog them comnonly bugger each other.

    Have heard it from them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    For whatever reason Peter Jackson felt compelled to add completely out-of-place non-whites as residents of Lake Town in the Hobbit movies.

    I remember Peter Jackson getting shamed and guilt tripped over the LOTR not having any of the requisite diversity (((Hollywood))) demands in movies. So in an apparent attempt to virtue signal and atone for this grievous infraction he threw in a couple of Negresses and Asians at Lake Town in The Hobbit trilogy, but they had no speaking part. However, they’ll probably be the main characters when Disney purchases the rights and rolls out the remake in 2030.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Alden
    I’ve read the first 2 Dune books several times and seen the movie.

    But I could never figure out exactly why spice was so valuable and what it was used for.

    Spice prolonged life and intensified psychic abilities. It was necessary for the Mentats who performed a service called “folding space” (the Holtzman effect) which enabled multi-light year space trips in very little actual time.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Thanks.
    , @Lana Kane
    "Spice prolonged life and intensified psychic abilities. It was necessary for the Mentats who performed a service called “folding space” (the Holtzman effect) which enabled multi-light year space trips in very little actual time."

    The Guild Navigators (seriously mutated humans) performed the foldspace navigation schtick, and spice was the key to their talent; the mentats were human calculators that performed the functions of (outlawed) electronic computers. I don`t recall that spice was necessary for them to do that, in fact I think Herbert`s main theme in Dune is that humans have vast untapped mental and physical potential that can be released through proper training and the therapeutic use of psychedelic drugs (definitely a reflection of the times in which he was writing; late 60s through the early eighties).

    It`s so sad that I know all of that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    Apart from the obvious racial politics (I nonetheless enjoyed the movie, but I am a Star Wars fan), equally obvious is the intended parallel with the interwar period, with the Empire representing Wilhemite Germany and the First Order the Nazis. This would escape the vast majority of American viewers, of course, but I’m surprised no neocon reviewer has brought attention to it, with the usual recommendation: that failure of the New Republic to completely vanquish the Empire led to a continuation of hostilities. (FWIW, the Disney animated series Star Wars Rebel has an episode where the Empire exterminates the Geonossians by, you guessed it, poison gas.)

    ” This would escape the vast majority of American viewers”

    Yes, it would, mainly because it isn’t there. This “obvious” parallel simply wouldn’t occur to anyone who didn’t go in search of it. I doubt that it was intended by the writers at all.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon • Disclaimer says:

    These SJW Star Wars movies may end up killing Disney in the long run. They spent billions getting the rights, which means they must make billions in PROFIT. However, that may be easier said than done:

    1. The new toys/merchandise doesn’t sell very well.

    2. The latest SJW SW movie has reportedly tanked in critical Asian markets, for obvious reasons.

    3. These movies are very expensive to make and then market (double the production budget to get a rough estimate).

    4. Theater haul is NOT profit for the studio. American theater take is about 50% and overseas theaters take 60-75% – Chinese theaters take roughly 75%.

    5. These movies now seem to be in a diminishing returns phase, with the latest SJW SW movie being off by $175 million from the last one.

    Let’s do a rough calculation.

    Assume a $300 million production & marketing budget for this movie.

    Assume it makes $1 billion box office globally.

    $600M US – $300 budget = $300 M

    x 0.5 = $150M US profit.

    $400M overseas (generous, I think) x 0.33 (also generous due to the size of the Chinese market) = $132M

    Total = $282M profit

    Assuming Disney spent $2 billion on rights acquisition, someone could be in a lot of trouble over a Disney 10 years from now, especially since these movies are now at a diminishing returns stage. They will have to crank out a lot of successful movies to make up the difference.

    The correct thing to have done here was to go all out appealing to the white male demographic followed by token presence of the others (give a good love story for the white females and lots of action for the Hispanic male audience). It wasn’t to turn this property over to a group of feminist liberals who don’t know that market. It wasn’t to give troll feed to talentless SJW movie critics who couldn’t hack it the industry as creators and now spend thousands of words attacking 62% of your movie going demographic.

    I can guarantee somebody ain’t sleeping well over at Disney. Could that be the reason we’re getting a Han Solo spinoff? They need LOTS of movies. Could that be the reason they are rushing to get JJ back?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Philip Owen
    I've not seen Star Wars but I did see the Lone Ranger and I was astonished that there was not one sympathetic white male character in the story. I assumed that it was made for a Chinese audience. Would this be the case for the modern SW?

    “I’ve not seen Star Wars but I did see the Lone Ranger and I was astonished that there was not one sympathetic white male character in the story. ”

    Probably why that movie tanked and was a huge disaster. Also, Chinese theaters take about 75% of the box office, so it doesn’t make economic sense for American companies to make movies specifically for that audience. It looks like Hollywood has forgotten its core audience in an effort to get a new one, kinda like they did with Ghostbusters 2016.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I can’t claim to have ever really liked Star Wars. In retrospect, the only thing good about the original trilogy was the time of my life it came out in. I was a kid then, and happier. That’s about it.

    But I remember being very strongly affected by David Lynch’s Dune. I first saw it when I was about 7 years old, I think, one evening when my parents and a whole entourage from our church were meeting in the home of some associates of theirs in a neighboring city (I recall the drive there and back being interminable).

    I was running around outside, doing damage and getting into trouble as usual, so after the perfunctory beatings from my father, his more enlightened, upper class hosts decided to sit me down with a good movie to keep me occupied.

    That movie happened to be Dune. I don’t know if they owned it or if it was being shown on cable or what, but it was the Alan Smithee cut, the full 3-hour extravaganza. Now, we didn’t have a television in our house when I was a kid, so just getting to watch a movie was something of a treat in itself. But getting to watch Dune at just that particular time in my life under just those circumstances was nothing short of a divine gift. More than the story itself (which I admittedly was unable to follow at that young age) was the general atmosphere, that curious mix of science, philosophy, and mysticism which seemed to hold endless wonders and conceal endless secrets. It resonated with me very profoundly.

    Read More
    • Replies: @El Dato
    Quite. It seems to be the desert that gives rise to mysticism in general. Hey we got a couple of testaments and Castaneda's Peyotle-fuelled trips from it.

    Moebius on his desert experiences:

    https://youtu.be/jNas99oEXBU?t=435

    I first saw it when I was about 7 years old, I think
     
    This is mental abuse of minors.

    At 15, the Lnychian Baron's sad predilection for screaming, power play, terror, blood and getting off at snuffing boys was enough for a couple of months.


    Also:

    David Lynch’s Dune is What You Get When You Build a Science Fictional World With No Interest in Science Fiction

    In the distilling of the plot, every other branch of the story becomes superfluous—and many of the characters do too. This results in the Harkonnens doing nothing in the film besides being despicable to the grandest extremes Lynch can summon. Forget any semblance of intelligence and scheming, the Baron Harkonnen has been reduced to a rabid dog of a man who screams and spins and bounces to and fro like a punctured balloon. The movie also has the distinction of branding the character in an explicitly homophobic light by heightening the Baron’s actions and displaying them all at once: in a single scene we watch the man have his facial sores drained by a doctor (which gay writer Dennis Altman has pointed out appears to be part of the pervasive AIDS imagery that suffused pop culture in the 80s) before abruptly sexually assaulting and brutally murdering a young male servant, bleeding him out while his relatives observe. The choice to connect these moments visually in one savage blow cannot be overlooked or underestimated… particularly when the very next scene shows a flash of Lady Jessica and Duke Leto making love. It is a very literal Point-A-to-Point-B association of homosexuality with perversion, violence, and sickness, contrasted immediately with heterosexuality signifying loving, caring bonds and relationships.
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    Palpatine was a good deal harsher than the Kaiser, no doubt. But the Galactic Empire did feel the need to retain some trappings of the old Republic like the Senate, at least for administrative purposes. And there were prominent individuals (like Organa and his daughter) who had enough popular support that they could not be simply arrested without cause, even if they were regarded as unreliable. It was not until the Death Star was completed that the Empire could rule purely by terror, so they were not quite as totalitarian as assumed, though clearly brutal.

    At the end of the Galactic Civil War the Empire survived as a rump state with limitations on their ability to rearm, which they flouted. Lonely voices for action were ignored until the rise of the explicitly militaristic First Order. And this is precisely the neocon view of the interwar period: Versailles was too lenient, not too harsh, and paved the way to Munich.

    But the Galactic Empire did feel the need to retain some trappings of the old Republic like the Senate

    That’s because it obviously was modelled on ancient Rome, not imperial Germany.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Fair enough, it’s not a perfect parallel. But the resolution of the Civil War seems clearly patterned after Versailles.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor
    In a way, the New STAR WARS Makes Perfect Sense Given the Change in Ownership from George Lucas to Disney. Force reflects real power.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAtV2KTeR0o

    Richard Spencer in the video above complains about how the New STAR WARS doesn't respect or conform to the original vision created by George Lucas. And many others have lodged similar complaints. Across the political spectrum, many are not pleased with the new series and especially the new movie because it deviates from the original vision that they grew up with. Many adult audience members spent their formative yrs watching the original series, the first three released from 1977 to 1983 and the second trilogy from 1999 to 2005. So, they have a fixed idea of what STAR WARS universe and the Force are about. Therefore, when confronted with the revisions and narrative-thematic purging of the New Series, they are bewildered and even exasperated by Disney's lack of 'respect' for Lucas' original vision. (But do they ever ask why Lucas still deserves respect when he sold his baby to Disney for billions of shekels?)

    Now, the complainers have a point. The new series may well indeed violate the core principles of Lucas' original vision. It may go against the spirit of the original incarnation under Lucas' command. But they are overlooking certain key facts about the Way of Power in culture. What goes for Power goes for the Force. The Force in STAR WARS is whatever those with the possession of copyright say it is. The Force was what it was as long as Lucas had control over it. But with Jews at Disney now owning STAR WARS, the Force is whatever THEY make it out to be. It's as Carl Schmitt said of the nature of law and power. No law exists outside the reality of power. Basic laws are vaguely worded, and it is the Power that decides the meaning and force of those words. So, when Jews gained control of US culture and jurisprudence, the Constitution came to mean Open Borders, Diversity, Anti-White Dogma(to enforce white submissivism necessary to serve Jewish dominance), and 'Gay Marriage'. Americanism and Constitutionalism were always shaped and determined by the Power. After all, what is Free Speech? Jews once used to say Free Speech means all speech, from far right to far left, should be free.Back then, Jews feared censorship of Jewish radicalism and pornography(big profits for Jews) by traditional Christian power. But once Jews gained supreme power in the US, they came to fear Free Speech as criticism of Jewish Power. Therefore, Jews redefined Free Speech as excluding 'hate speech'. Since Jewish Power controls the meaning of 'hate speech', Zionist speech(that demeans Palestinians) is not 'hate speech', but BDS speech that calls for justice for Palestinians must be criminalized as 'hate'. The Power decides what is 'hate', and that means Jewish elites with supreme power in the US get to denounce and suppress certain speech as 'hateful'.

    What goes for Reality goes for Fantasy. The rules of fantasy will always be controlled by those with power over the fantasy. So, it doesn't matter what Lucas did with the original STAR WARS. It doesn't matter how the Force was manifested in the first six movies. The fact is the power of the Force has gone over to Jews at Disney, and that means Jews will alter the Force to suit their agendas and biases. It's simple as that. So, when Richard Spencer and others talk of STAR WARS as a universe existing independent of copyright ownership and moneyed control, they are being naive. They are presuming that there really is a Core Canonical Principles of the STAR WARS and the dynamics of the Force. No, such was all make-believe and can easily be altered based on whomever is now in control.
    Spencer has emphasized over and over how it's foolish to believe in Constitutionalism as a principle independent of power. He has castigated the so-called True Conservatives who claim to stand for abstract American Values of Liberty and Individualism. His point is that American Constitutionalism will always be determined by those with real power. The Constitution can be molded to mean just about anything. At one time, it even justified slavery and the ethnic cleansing of American Indians. And the 'internment' of the Japanese. And censorship of obscene material offensive to Christians. The Constitution allowed all such censorship and restrictions in the past because the White Christian Majority could will the Constitution to support and defend certain values and interests. But once Jews gained control of the Constitution, the US came to be all about ISRAEL FIRST, favoring Zionists over all other peoples(esp the Palestinians), Open Borders Immigration to turn whites into a minority, and etc. The Constitution now serves the interests of Zionist-Supremacism. And since Jews have chosen Homomania as the proxy agent of Jewish Globlaism, the Worship of Homos and Trannies has become the new christianity or Queertianity. The Christian Church is like the Constitution. In the end, it will be what those in power say it's about. The Power decides and molds & twists the presumed core principles to its will.

    If Spencer is so perceptive about the relation between Power and Laws, why is he so naive and earnest in his assessment of the new STAR WARS movie? He seems baffled as to why the new series violated and betrayed what STAR WARS is really supposed to be about. But his idea of 'real Star Wars' only applies to the franchise that was owned by Lucas. As long as Lucas had power over his baby, he could do as he pleased. But when he sold the Force to Disney, Jews had the power over the Force, and they could bend it to serve their own biases and agendas. It's like if you give your kid up for adoption, the adoptive parents can do whatever they want to with it. Jews can adopt a non-Jew and raise it as a Jew. And of course, the new STAR WARS reflects this reality. What are the agendas of Jewish globalists? It is white feminism. Jews use feminism or man-hate to drive a wedge between white men and white women. By thus setting white women against white men, white race is weakened, and it is easier for Jews to maintain control over white goyim. Jews also push race-mixing to destroy racial and ethnic identities. A people with confused identities are less likely to unite and rise up against the ruling elites. It is also a way to demoralize white males and destroy their pride. By especially promoting interracism between black males and white females, Jews send a message that black males are superior studs while white males are either dorky cucks or wussy homos. And the new STAR WARS is geared to turning its white heroine into a race-mixer. We see this all around in TV commercials, TV shows, and movies. Jews want to make the next James Bond black. Jews want to put the black male on the pedestal as the top alpha male who deserves to take white women. As for white males, they are either old farts who should die or dorky cucks who should delight in their own defeat and humiliation.

    Jews also push for massive 'immigration' to increase Diversity. Why do Jews do this? Jewish elites fear a homogeneous population that might unite against Jewish power. So, Jews seek to increase Diversity and set various goyim against one another. That way, the goyim won't be able to unite as one people against Jewish elites. And of course, the new STAR WARS is all about Diversity, a weapon of Jews against native populations of any nation. Meanwhile, virtually all the villains are white, especially white males.

    In the end, the Power decides the meaning of anything. This was true of how Christianity got started. It developed as a branch or heresy of Judaism. Jews denounced Christianity as a violation of the true meaning of God in the Torah and Jewish tradition. How dare these gentiles take something from Jews and change the meanings to make God serve gentiles than Jews? According to the original spirit of the Torah, God cannot be manifest in human form. And God's Covenant is with Jews, not with all of humanity. But Christianity had Jesus as Son of God, a human figure walking among mankind. And Christianity said the new covenant is with all of humanity. In the end, it didn't matter how much Jews protested. The fact is when the idea of God passed over to Christian and later Muslim gentiles, they changed or twisted the principles to serve their own interests and agendas. Jewish concept of God was limited only to spaces in which Jews had the power. In gentile spaces where Christians and Muslims had control over the idea of God, His meaning and design could be altered, even drastically, to serve interests inimical to Jews.

    So, what happened to STAR WARS isn't much different from what happened to the concept of the Jewish God once its ownership passed over to gentiles. Via Christian conversion, many gentiles became believers in God, and this belief gave them ownership of the meaning of God. And in their self-interest, they altered and violated many principles so dear to Jews who had once held sole ownership of their God.
    Likewise, STAR WARS owned by Lucas and beloved by so many people had canonical value only as long as its ownership remained with those who remained loyal to the original vision. But once the ownership changed hands, the New Masters were bound to make the franchise serve their own biases and interests.
    This happens with every newspaper or magazine. It doesn't matter what its original masthead declaration of principles was. The new owners will bend the purpose to their own will. This is why The New Republic changed drastically when it was taken over by Neocons under the tutelage of Martin Peretz. And then, once ownership changed once more, it turned into just some homo-globalist hipster rag. Or consider Huffington Post. Despite its name, Ariana Huffington has nothing to do with the new incarnation, and it's changed considerably from what it had been under her control.

    If Alt Right has gained ownership of STARS WARS franchise, they would have made it serve its vision and interests. Richard Spencer as producer-director of STAR WARS would have made the Empire the good guys, and of course, many fans would have screamed Bloody Murder in protest. It's like Stanley Kubrick did his OWN thing with THE SHINING to the never-ending ire of Stephen King who felt Kubrick betrayed his core concept and meaning. But as King had sold movie rights to Kubrick, he was helpless to stop it.
    Indeed, if there is such a thing as Alt Right STAR WARS fanfiction, the narratives likely serve the biases of White Nationalism. But since Jews of Disney own STAR WARS, the franchise is now used to further the Jewish Supremacist agenda of globalism.

    Same thing happened with dialectical communism. The original theory by Karl Marx prophesied that conditions would worsen to the point where the working class would rise up to overthrow the bourgeoisie. Since the Proletariat was essential to this revolution, only an industrialized nation with a majority prole population could undergo the great tranformation. But when Lenin and Stalin took control of the theory, it was altered so that even a backward semi-industrial nation like Russia could have a communist revolution. Spontaneous uprising by the working class was no longer necessary. A radical vanguard with the support of secret police apparatus could pull it off. Later, Mao altered the meaning of Marxism even more by arguing that a communist revolution could happen with a peasant army. So, despite the original canonical meaning of Marxist theory, in the real world of actual practice, Marxism could be molded to be anything by the powers-that-be. If Maoism said Marxism could prevail in an agricultural society, that was the official lore of the land.And later, when reformers took control of China, communism could mean market economics. So, even as the Chinese Communist Party maintained the symbolism of Mao, the Red Flag, and revolutionary pageantry, the New Way was about buying-and-selling, trade with capitalist powers, and getting rich. Indeed, consider how Che Guevara became linked with capitalist pop culture and hedonism even though he hated Rock music, hippies, and materialism.

    So, if we apply Carl-Schmitt-ian analysis to the new STAR WARS, no one should be surprised that the new owners of the Force changed the meaning to suit their ethno-socio-economic purposes. No school of laws, no work of culture, and no set of principles exist in some pure form in a vacuum. They always exist in a world of people with competing interests and agendas. Indeed, even among Christians, different sects disagree on the meaning of Jesus. In many denominations today, homomaniacs have taken over and insist that the faith is about worshiping homos and trannies. And warmongering patriots believe that Christianity is about the flag and guns. So, expecting the STAR WARS universe to remain pristine or resist heretical ideas is wishful thinking. STAR WARS will be whatever those with ownership of it make it to be.
    It's like the Hagia Sophia Mosque in Istanbul. It was originally built as a Christian Cathedral, but Muslims altered the meaning. At one time, Ottoman Turks even altered the Parthenon to serve as a place of prayer for Muslims. But then, Christians had done the same to Pagan Temples. While Christians destroyed some pagan temples, they altered some to serve Jesus than the pagan gods. If we see STAR WARS as a kind of pop mythology or fanboy church, its core meaning will change to the tune of whoever has control over it. Consider the evolution of the Parthenon depending on who held power over Athens.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGitmYl6U90

    Another complaint oft-heard from the detractors of the new series is that the nature of the Force has change considerably from the original series. They object to how the Force has become so easy with the young heroine. And Spencer wonders how someone with such humble background could have the Force. But, they are forgetting that George Lucas himself kept changing the nature of the Force. In PHANTOM MENACE, he altered the Force from some mysterious essence to something that can be medically detected in blood. And for those who have problems with the young heroine's humble background in the new series, the old series would have us believe that some slave woman could give a miracle virgin birth to some kid who, at the tender age of 7, can win a hyper-drive chariot race and man spaceships and blow up seasoned enemy pilots. So, if a 7 yr old squirt can do all that, is it really so strange to see a young heroine do 'badass' things?

    Also, if a female slave non-entity(in PHANTOM MENACE) could give a miracle birth to some kid with the Force, why is it so surprising that the heroine in the new series could have super-Force despite being born to humble parents? Besides, if the 20th century taught us anything, it was that those from the humblest backgrounds could become giants of history: Stalin, Hitler, Mao, etc.

    As for the heroine's ease with mastering the Force, we need to understand that pop culture reflects the times. When Lucas made STAR WARS, power was still institutionalized. One had to go through the proper institutions/channels or gain access to big industries to be somebody. To be an influential journalist, one had to gain position at CBS or New York Times. To be an influential thinker, one had to have a position at Harvard or be promoted by top publishing companies and the media. To be a famous cultural celebrity, one had to be hired by TV, Hollywood, radio, or music industry. Even though there were alternative venues and underground artists, it was a tough climb to gain any kind of success, at least immediately. And Lucas struggled in this world. For him to gain access to film technology, he had to work hard and long and make the climb. To gain the Force, one had to go through the institutions controlled by high priests.

    But we now live in the internet age. Even a young person in a small town now has access to more news and information than New York Times did in the pre-internet age. When Lucas grew up, it was difficult to see foreign films. Only college towns and big cities showed them, and one had to wait long time to see certain movies. It was nearly impossible for anyone to see something when he wanted.
    Today, even someone living in the boonies can watch all sorts of movies from all parts of the world on the internet. Even a kid has more access to World Cinema than top film scholars did prior to the internet age.
    Also, even kids carry around smartphones that serve not only as phones but as internet screens, cameras, recording devices, and etc. It's like their light sabers.
    Thus, the Force has gone from institutional and individual in our world. Before the internet, someone like PewDiePie and Stefan Molyneux didn't have a chance at celebrity-hood. Institutions would not have given them the platform to express their views or pull their antics. But internet has been the great equalizer. Anyone can reach the world from inside their bedrooms. Some of these 'amateurs' have more fans and viewership than mainstream media do.
    So, the revision of the Force in the new series could very well reflect social change. Young people with interesting ideas, music, opinions, personalities, or shtick no longer have to make the Long March through the Institutions to say their say, gain a fanbase, develop a cult, and even become fabulously rich. Even demented Andrew Anglin has gained legendary anti-hero status because of the internet. Even with the attempts to shut down Daily Stormer, Anglin still has enough Troll Force to mess with the Narrative.

    Alt Right should know this since its rise owes so much to the internet, the great equalizer that has made it possible for oddballs like Mark Dice and Styxhexenhammer666 to get huge followings. This is why Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, and Google-Search are working in tandem with ADL to rig the game and ban certain voices deemed 'hateful', but the nature of the internet favors individuals over institutions. It has democratized the Force, for good or for ill.

    So, given all these changes and developments in society, is it any wonder that the nature of the Force has changed in the new series? Whereas Luke had to go through the institutions to gain his power, Rey doesn't. The Force has been digitalized and democratized.

    Internet and gadgets like smartphones have empowered individuals in ways that were unforeseeable when Lucas conceived STAR WARS. Just consider how the rise of high-tech allowed young ones to become overnight moguls and billionaires. Prior to the internet, could someone like Mark Zuckerberg become so rich so fast?

    Now, I'm not saying LAST JEDI is a good movie. I haven't seen it. I did see FORCE AWAKENS, and it was terrible. But, we should not be surprised that Force will change along with the change in ownership and will reflect social transformations all around us. In the end, most pop culture, even when set in the distant past or fantasy world, are more reflections of prevailing fashions and trends of the moment than works of purity remaining faithful to a set of core principles inside a bubble.

    Internet made even this young woman a celebrity and a known factor in culture:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGEilqBNKwk

    So, what happened to STAR WARS isn’t much different from what happened to the concept of the Jewish God once its ownership passed over to gentiles. Via Christian conversion, many gentiles became believers in God, and this belief gave them ownership of the meaning of God. And in their self-interest, they altered and violated many principles so dear to Jews who had once held sole ownership of their God.

    Holding up the (Jewish) Disney corporation acquisition of (Gentile) George Lucas’s SW property as an example of the same process as the formation of the (Gentile) Christian heritage on the mouldering bones of the Hebraic (Jewish) tradition reads like a sort of Satanic inversion.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Holding up the (Jewish) Disney corporation acquisition of (Gentile) George Lucas’s SW property as an example of the same process as the formation of the (Gentile) Christian heritage on the mouldering bones of the Hebraic (Jewish) tradition reads like a sort of Satanic inversion.

    The new STAR WARS or STAR SCHWARZ made things much worse, but Lucas ruined it long long ago. He came up with a great vision but emotionally grew backward and made the Saga about nothing but toys, special effects, and pandering to kids. Despite their faults, STAR WARS and EMPIRE worked as storytelling and set up a great finale. Luke vs Darth. But RETURN OF JEDI was filled with fish-headed generals and jungle teddy bears. Also, Lucas had the tendency to combine naive infantilism with quasi-tendentious sermonizing. So, he said that Ewoks were like the Viet Cong because US, the great industrial power, was defeated by jungle warriors of Vietnam. But this is silly. The battle takes place in a single afternoon in RETURN and just a handful of Ewoks die. In contrast, Vietnam War lasted for 8 yrs(officially and unofficially even longer), and at least 2 million Viets died and many got wounded. Also, the viets were not a hunter-gatherer tribe with stone age weapons but armed and supplied by the OTHER GREAT INDUSTRIAL Power, the Soviets. But Lucas gave us teddy bears in space and then made some bogus pompous political statements, like he is Colonel Kurtz in APOCALYPSE NOW or something. It was funny seeing a man getting sillier and more serious at the same time. And the whole STAR WARS is like that. In some ways, it gets darker and more 'complicated'. We discover Darth is really pa of Luke, and Luke is tempted to the Dark Side. And the prequels say something about how democracy can turn into tyranny. And yet, at the center of the narrative is just a lot of hokum and kiddie stuff. STAR WARS could have been EXCALIBUR IN SPACE but it just became a big pinball machine.

    That STAR WARS got Jewishized into STAR SCHWARZ is interesting given that the core inspiration of the STAR WARS universe is pagan. Even though Lucas drew some ideas from the Bible and Judeo-Christian tradition, it owes more to paganism of Greco-Roman mythology, Germanic mythology, Japanese samurai cult & Kurosawa films, Arthurian legends, the Western, and 20th century Fascist-Nazi aesthetics. It was about the brotherhood of knighthood, the cult of the warrior.
    And of course, STAR SCHWARZ continues in that vein. It still owes more to paganist inspirations than anything in the Bible. And yet, why is it Jewishy? Because there are many aspects to Jewishness. There is core Jewishness of religion and heritage. But there is also the Pawnbroker Jewishness, the art of merchantry where Jews take control of pagan/gentile icons & idols and use/exploit them to serve the Jewish agenda. It's like a Jewish pawnbroker wasn't a collector of only Jewish stuff. He gained ownership of tons of goy, pagan, gentile stuff. He used them for profits or props to push Jewish interests.
    In our world, Jews promote Diversity and Interracism on whites. Diversity weakens white unity and white power. Interracism destroys white male pride, thus whites become cucked. So, even though STAR SCHWARZ is still paganist, those paganist altars have been altered to favor the political and ideological agenda of Jewish Globalist Power. This is also true of homomania. The history of homo cult is paganist. It was biggest among pagan Greeks and decadent Romans. And some pagan tribes were tolerant of homo stuff. Samurai could bugger one another sometimes. In contrast, Jewish history was anti-homo. So, how did Jews, even religious Jews, become such promoters of Homomania? Because this paganism can be used by Jews to weaken gentiles. By promoting Homos as wonderful elites, society normalizes the notion of the minority ruling elite. Also, by weakening the moral core of Christians by making churches adopt homomania, Christians no longer have true moral pride. Any people who worship homo fecal penetration as holy cannot be truly moral. They are degenerates whose moral righteousness depends on hype, hysteria, and propaganda than moral depth or meaning.

    Jews tend to be monomaniacal and seek world dominance, and there have been three ways of going about achieving this. (1) Sticking to Jewish tradition and the Covenant. Keeping strict barriers between holy Jews and filthy goyim. This school of thought said if Jews remain clean and serve God, God will take care of things and favor Jews, and Jews will inherit the earth. (2) Creating a new universal idea(as outgrowth of tribal Jewishness) and spreading that idea to destroy all other ideas. Christianity and Communism were such Jewish ideas. The ideal of Christianity that began as Jewish heresy is to convert the whole world to Jesus and to destroy all other ideas. Paganisms of all kinds must be destroyed. Non-believers are heathens and must be converted or condemned. Communism was a secular kind of Christianity. Supposedly, Marx figured everything out, and only communism was the truth, and all other ideas had to be destroyed or exterminated. The whole world must be made communist. One idea for all mankind.

    The problem of (1) was that extreme tribalism didn't do much for Jews in terms of power. NO matter how pure they were remained in blood and no matter how much they remained faithful to God, Jews didn't inherit the world. As for (2), even though those ideas began as Jewish ideas, gentiles eventually took control of them, and Jews got burned. Christians began to persecute Jews. And communism eventually suppressed Jewish identity. And then, even Jewish communists came to be suspected and marginalized as untrustworthy.

    But there was (3) way. By this way, Jews would accept the existence of pagan/gentile ideas. Jews would accept the poly-ideastic way of the world. Unlike (1) Jews, the (3) Jews would extensively engage with the gentile world. But unlike (2) Jews, they would not try to conquer the world with one idea, like Christianity or Communism. Rather, they would allow various ideas/interests to exist BUT have those ideas/interests serve the Higher and Greater ideas/interests of Jews. It's like the Roman Empire. It allowed non-Romans to keep their cultures and etc. But the Empire also insisted that non-Romans all serve Roman agendas and interests in the end. Instead of universalism where everyone has the same ideas, icons, and idols, it'd be a poly-versal empire where various peoples would stick to their ideas, icons, and idols that, however, would be manipulated to serve the Higher Idea. So, Jews adopted a kind of neo-paganism for their own purposes. In pagan cosmology, there are various gods, but there is also the top god, and the lower gods serve the top god. Jewish manipulation of neo-paganism had non-Jews as lesser gods serving Jews as the top gods. This way, pagans/gentiles could have their own identities and cultures... but they would ultimately bow down to the higher identity and culture of Jews.

    And we see this with how STAR WARS became STAR SCHWARZ. It is still very pagan and steeped in the Carl-Jung-Joseph-Campbell thing, but it now favors feminism, jungle fever, Diversity, and etc to occupy what were essentially roles defined by European pagans. But we see the same thing with BBC. British and European histories are retconned to push the Jewish agenda of Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs with Jungle Fever for white women and cuckery for white men. Hollywood Jews said the next James Bond will be a Negro.
    The great western heroes, Lancelot and Achilles, have been made black in BBC and TV shows. So, even as Jews maintain the pagan idols, they change the cast to push the Jewish agenda of perpetuating white submissivism so that whites will forever lose white pride and identity. A people without pride become mental slaves and serve OTHER peoples.

    https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bXWv5Is_X9Q/WklRiiULqWI/AAAAAAAABzs/0rRGyUooP3QkTDGQdIKAoRbNVGmYgtUmQCLcBGAs/s1600/DSU_1m1X4AECoJE.jpg

    Communism and Christianity(and Islam) were mono-imperial systems. Ideally, all of humanity should come under the One True Idea, and all men must struggle for the exact same principles and goals. Both have roots in Jewish culture because Jews developed the notion of the One God and One Truth, with all other gods deserving to be either holocausted or denied their validity/existence.

    In contrast, there was the poly-imperial systems. It attempted to conquer as many lands and people as possible. But it didn't believe there was one true idea for all. It was more about power and control than conversion. So, other peoples, the conquered subjects, could believe in their own gods, stick with their own traditions/values, and worship their own idols. However, they had to accept the Imperial Rulers as the top power. They had to pay taxes to the top power. They had to bow down to the military might of the top power. Romans were like this,and the Romans managed well with most pagan folks. But they had the most problem with Jews because, unlike pagans, Jews believed their God was the only true God. So, Romans had the stronger military and greater material power, but Jews had the stronger idea, greater spiritual might, and farther-reaching prophetic vision. Romans could win with arms, but Jews could win with vision. But to win, Jews had to develop an idea that could win over the hearts of gentiles/pagans. And that was Christianity. In a way, the spread of Christianity was a great triumph of the Jewish idea over gentiles. But because most Jews didn't take to the new faith and stuck with their own original concept, the Jewish Heresy turned on them. So, Christianity was both the biggest triumph and tragedy for Jews. Communism would turn out similarly. Jews won big and lost big with it.

    So, what is the best way for Jews to win? Self-enclosed tribalism won't get anywhere. Jews must engage with the whole world that is goyim. Should Jews come up with a universal idea for all mankind? But then, gentiles will eventually come to own the idea and use it for their own interests, and this might hurt Jews.
    Given those odds, the best way is for Jews to make peace with gentile ideas, icons, and interests but find some way to make them serve Jewish identity, ideas, and interests as the highest and greatest there is. It's like how Jews work with Evangelicals. Jews are okay with the born-again folks worshiping Jesus and etc, BUT much of Evangelicalism is now 'muh Israel, muh Israel, muh Israel'. Jews work well with Mormons, but Mormons are all about 'muh Israel, muh Israel, muh Israel'. So, Jews are okay with Mormons being Mormons BUT Mormons better still put Jewish interests above Mormon interests. It's like Romans were okay with Syrians and Britons, but those conquered folks still had to obey Roman power before their own. Even as Romans didn't erase other people's cultures and idols, those had to be made subservient to Roman culture and idols as the highest there are.
    And modern Jews adopted this, esp from Anglos, the modern folks who come closest to being like the Romans of old. So, the US is now about diversity and how different folks can have their own cultures, identities, and narratives... BUT they better put 'muh Israel' before anything. Jews don't have to attend meetings for Russian, Iranian, Chinese, Mexican, African, etc interests BUT all gentile politicians have to attend AIPAC to praise 'muh Israel'. Look at that whore Nikki Haley, the semi-person-of-dot.

    The COEN movie HAIL CAESAR offers a useful glimpse into this Jewish agenda. Like some other Coen movies, it is pretty mocking of Christianity as a religion that controls the goyim. Even though goyim have used Christianity to oppress Jews, it also tames goyim and turns them into saps who can be manipulated by Jews.
    Some people think Coens are respectful of Christianity. They are not. What they are interested in is the psycho-politics of Christianity, and in this, they share something with Steven Spielberg who has adopted Catholicist and Evangelical tropes to push his vision of Pop Jewishism on the world.

    In a scene in HAIL CAESAR we see a Rabbi who is offended by what Christian clergy has to say. Even though Jews have been anti-Christian, there's a kind of paradox. Jews have been so anti-Christian because they are so Christoid, conviction that Jewish individuals could become like Christ. The main problem that Jews have with Christianity is it deified the prophet and messiah into Son of God or even God. The Jewish idea of the Messiah was a great prophet, warrior, messenger. Jews never conceived of messiah as God or even Son of God. Jewish concept of the messiah is empowering because the messiah is a prophet, and a man can be a prophet. So, by the Jewish concept of the messiah, any Jewish man can, at least theoretically, be a messiah since he could be the great prophet. In contrast, Christianity says the messiah is not a prophet but the Son of God or God Himself. And that means there is no more Future. The Truth has been revealed through Jesus the Son of God, and humanity has no more need for prophets. After Jesus, there can only be saints. Saints are different from prophets. Saints don't have the great vision. They just have the pure faith in God and Jesus. Their duty is to be angelic and devoted. They are not seers of the Future since the Truth has already been revealed. Thus, Christianity destroyed the prophetic tradition. It allowed for many saints but no prophets. In contrast, Jews never gave up on the notion of the prophet. Since the messiah has yet to come and since a man can be a prophet and since a prophet can be the messiah, any Jewish man can, at least theoretically, be the prophet-messiah.

    In some ways, Christianity is more hubristic than Judaism, but in some ways, it is more humble. It is more hubristic in the notion that a Man who walks on Earth can be the Son of God, even God. To Jews, this was pure blasphemy, an affront to God.
    And yet, precisely because Jesus wasn't just a great prophet but Son of God or God as the Messiah, no other man can ever come anywhere near Him or be like Him. He is the ONLY Man who could be the Messiah since Christianity says Messiah = Son of God = God.

    In contrast, Judaism can be said to be more humble because it says no man can be the Son of God or God. God is too great and doesn't manifest Himself in human form. And yet, because the Jewish concept of the Messiah is a prophet, any Jew could conceivably be him. Granted, the Messiah could be like an angel sent from Heaven. Even so, he is still not Son of God or God. He is still closer to man if not a man. Since Jews defined the Messiah in this manner, each Jew is instilled with propheticism which is far more ambitious and egoistic than sainthood, which is about devotion and faith. A prophet is humble before God but confident of his vision as the messenger of God. In contrast, a saint is not about the power of mind and vision but goodness of the heart and faith. It's a bit sappy.

    In the conference with rabbi and Christian clergy in HAIL CAESAR, the rabbi says God cannot be shown in Jewish culture. And in the movie, we are not shown the face of Jesus in the movie-within-the-movie. But we see a lot of the Roman soldier. And we see the shabbos goy gentile studio boss, but we are never shown his Jewish boss Schenk who is like a godly presence. Both the Roman soldier(George Clooney) and the goy studio boss have two modes of behavior: soldier and saint. As soldier, he is rough and aggressive. But when faced with the greater prophetic power of Jesus, he goes into saint mode with sappy face. And the goy studio boss is the same way. He can be tough and push actors around. He whips the crew to get the job done. He is warrior-like in that mode. But he is deeply respectful to his boss Schenk who is like a divine prophet to him.(Schenk is like the Jewish prophet of capitalism; Marcuse is like Jewish prophet of communism; Hollywood is divided between two modes.) Schenk apparently has the vision whereas his shabbos goy underling can manage things but lacks the big vision. After all, Jews invented Hollywood, the empire of dreams where gentile-pagan idols and icons came to be reshaped to serve the Jewish Empire.

    HAIL CAESAR is a rather confused movie because its allusions are often double-or-triple-in-meaning. There is Scarlett Johansson as Rhinemaiden of Wagner's mythology. But she is swallowed up by what? Whale that swallowed Jonah? This Jewish whale also swallows the gold and then its blowhole ejaculates like Harvey Weinstein's pud. But later, this woman is like a perverse allusion to the Madonna. She is pregnant with a child from a uncertain father and she ends up marrying a guy named Joe, like Mary was married to Joseph. So,a character is alluded to both Germanic mythology and the Biblical story. Weird. And later a Soviet submarine emerges like the whale. I guess Sovietism is like the other Jewish creation. Whale of communism vs Whale of capitalism, both trying to devour the wealth of the world as a good or an evil. But the guy loses the money in the water cuz of the dog(like the dog that messed up the heist in THE KILLING by Kubrick). It's a very confused movie, but also a very inspired and interesting one. I can understand why it flopped at the box office. Though a comedy, there's a lot more going on there which is esoteric.

    Anyway, the movie is onto something. We tend to see history in terms of Jews vs Christianity but it's more like Future Christoidism vs Been-there-done-there-Christianism.
    Christianity says the Christ was among us, and He was Son of God, thus God, and we all need to be saints with sappy faces like when George Clooney looks at Jesus who offers him water.
    In contrast, Jews believe the Future is filled with new christoids with prophetic vision. Jews accept Jesus as prophet but not messiah. So, Christ was only a prophet, and that means there can be future christs or christoids... like Marx, Rand, Marcuse, etc. And the 20th century has been filled with Jewish prophets and would-be prophets. And this has been a source of great power for Jews. In the end, the stronger idea gains dominance over weaker ones. And the fact is the prophet is more powerful than the saint. Saint is a pawn on the chess board whereas the prophet is the rook or queen. Saint blindly and sappily serves and obeys the king. The queen and rook serve the king too but have their own agency and greater reach in movement.

    Because Jews are still in prophetic mode whereas Christians are in saint mode, the globalist empire has the weaker saintly ideas of gentiles serving the stronger prophetic ideas of Jews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @El Dato

    the Empire representing Wilhemite Germany
     
    Headscratch.

    How can the Empire represent Wilhemine Germany? There aren't even any Social Democrats, a non-absolutist Monarch or a Reichstag. Nor are there large rivals west and east of the Galaxy.

    Only neocons and ahistorical Hollywood writers can up with that kind of stuff.

    Nope, the Empire is an totalitarian structure lead by a Dark-Side Sorcerer who looks suspiciously Jewish, held together by fear of military power (mainly running on what could be considered Space Steampunk. Large cruisers / Ships of the line? Riding boots? Spik-and-Span militaristic drills? Guns that are being carried by hand?) One could write fun having sidestories about how the more fanatic elite revolutionary guards are playing political games against the old-school military types.


    failure of the New Republic to completely vanquish the Empire led to a continuation of hostilities.
     
    I wonder in what universe Wilhelmine Germany was not totally and completely vanquished. It was basically a Pinata, burnt down and being asked to hand out the gimmedats.

    Quick update: https://youtu.be/FTupV8o3mW4?t=5960

    Palpatine was a good deal harsher than the Kaiser, no doubt. But the Galactic Empire did feel the need to retain some trappings of the old Republic like the Senate, at least for administrative purposes. And there were prominent individuals (like Organa and his daughter) who had enough popular support that they could not be simply arrested without cause, even if they were regarded as unreliable. It was not until the Death Star was completed that the Empire could rule purely by terror, so they were not quite as totalitarian as assumed, though clearly brutal.

    At the end of the Galactic Civil War the Empire survived as a rump state with limitations on their ability to rearm, which they flouted. Lonely voices for action were ignored until the rise of the explicitly militaristic First Order. And this is precisely the neocon view of the interwar period: Versailles was too lenient, not too harsh, and paved the way to Munich.

    Read More
    • Replies: @German_reader

    But the Galactic Empire did feel the need to retain some trappings of the old Republic like the Senate
     
    That's because it obviously was modelled on ancient Rome, not imperial Germany.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I just won’t watch any more Star Wars flicks until they reinstate the expanded universe.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Joe Hide
    Here's the reality of why the current crop of movies is losing at the box office. They are intensely
    NOT- entertaining. Why are they so mind-numbingly boring? How can studios stay in business while producing box office bombs? Because central banks, the deep state, and globalists give billions of dollars at almost zero percent interest loans to studios and their ultimate owners ... and the tiny interest can be paid for with more loans, etc, etc, etc. This con / scam provides free money for the elitists agendas. The studios can then buy their own stock making it go up. The studios are thereby financially rewarded for producing box office bombs.

    The movie industry doesn’t depend on the American box office at all. It makes it’s money in the international market.

    That’s hundreds of millions of low paid third world men who just love the special effects , cartoonish explosions, car chases and all the rest.

    Plus it’s an industry where everybody gets paid long before the movies are finished and on the market.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "The movie industry doesn’t depend on the American box office at all. It makes it’s money in the international market."

    Not really. The US is a critical market. Just because a movie makes lots of money overseas doesn't mean that it makes a lot of profit. If an expensive Western movie tanks in the North American market, there is a good chance that it will make little or no profit despite how it does overseas.

    Take the World of Warcraft movie; it tanked in the US but made $200M in China, so you'd think by looking at it that the studio would be rushing out a sequel. But they're not. Why? Because Chinese theatre chains take about 75% of the haul (compared with just 50% in the US), meaning that $200M is closer to $50M. Coupled with the fact that sequels have a tendency to make less and there is no profit to making an expensive CGI-laden sequel.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @El Dato
    Well, the desert visuals were kinda great and really stay with out for a long time but I just don't understand Lynch completely and lubelessly messing up the book. Already in the first scene we see the Emperor as under the heel of the Guild, a reveal that is completely pointless as nobody fights the Guild in the whole movie. In the book the Emperor is clearly in charge - balancing forces, but in charge. There is weird mumbo-jumbo being injected sideways, as if Twin Peaks had come through an interdimensional portal. Meatloaf is too horrific, Sting and Kyle are too old (both should be 16yo brats), Bene Gesserit witches should actually be good-looking (I'm talking long-haired anime girl good looking with the brains to go with it), the hairless cat idea was too bizarre, thumpers are too big, desert suits should be anything else but black and should have hoods, spice eyes should be completely blue, no white allowed, and in the end it rains (whut??) but Alia is cool.

    Star Wars is all about fast-paced hyperspace-enhanced swasbuckling whereas Dune is all about politics and control and religion and economic forces in temporary equilibrium. Tatooine is just some completely unimportant boondocks. Dune is the most important place of the empire, doubly so as it also reveals itself as the second super-soldier breeding ground. There is a claustrophobia in the fact only Guild heighliners can do interstellar travel. Even imperial and private military depend on them (please pay the reception and no going to Alderaan on a whim). The Guild even has the monopoly on weather sats around Dune which is why poor Vlad has no idea what's brewing the deep south (always a weird idea, why not launch a sat from Arrakeen, self-financed ... well, many of ideas do not make full sense. But it's all charming.

    I wonder what would have become of Jodorowsky's Dune, never seen the documentary. His 80s "Incal", drawn by Moebius is fun (don't bother getting the electronically "reedited/recolored" version, it's utter crap: http://funnybookbabylon.com/2008/10/20/re-coloring-moebius/ ) but after that he worked without Moebius and teamed up with Gimenez and other illustrators. He went "Freudian" to the point of being entirely unenjoyable: Rape, abasement, torture, slavery, incest, genocide, more rape, ultrakill, more abasement, atrocities of all kind. A power-duo with Lynch, maybe?

    I’ve read the first 2 Dune books several times and seen the movie.

    But I could never figure out exactly why spice was so valuable and what it was used for.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Spice prolonged life and intensified psychic abilities. It was necessary for the Mentats who performed a service called "folding space" (the Holtzman effect) which enabled multi-light year space trips in very little actual time.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I moonlight as a part-time film critic.

    I haven’t seen the “Last Jedi.”

    But I’ve seen enough Hollywood films, to feel qualified to give this one, a thumbs down.

    Have a beautiful day.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • jeez, people actually talking shit about asimov.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Okechukwu
    Hehe. Another boycott, eh? Go ahead. Hollywood makes more money appealing to a normal, mainstream audience. They don't care about your faux boycotts.

    Normal, mainstream audiences explained:

    Plinkett saying smtg about Star Trek 2009:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Che Guava
    Happy New Year, y'all!

    2018, year of the “earth dog.”

    Let’s hope it’s a good one, for all.

    source: https://www.thechinesezodiac.org/horoscope-2018/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Good for you to knowing re five-elements combo.

    I am very dubious of these forms of divination, but the Chinese one has good symbolism in that nobody is living through the combination of animal and element at time of birth more than twice.

    In Japan, we also have a six-day cycle, and a system of unlucky years, among others, those mainly from elsewhere.

    Last night in Tokyo, clear sky and full moon on the night of New Year's Day, am thinking that is auspicious.

    However, almost no stars as always. Full moon + light pollution = even fewer visible stars and planets, even on a crystalline night.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Disney doesn’t want whites? You mean whites aren’t allowed to buy tickets to see Disney movies? That’ll be the day.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a war going on against white male.
    I fly Delta constantly. So I am subjected to their commercials from the web site to promos to inflight stuff, etc…. The white male is now nonexistent, even though he forks the vast majority of business class seats, but cannot be featured on screen/photos at all.
    Cognitive dissonance they call it. It feels awful actually to be bombarded in EVERY commercial but “the black female” who appears sexy enough on screen, but is a crazy animal in real life.
    I may move to Argentina.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    Apart from the obvious racial politics (I nonetheless enjoyed the movie, but I am a Star Wars fan), equally obvious is the intended parallel with the interwar period, with the Empire representing Wilhemite Germany and the First Order the Nazis. This would escape the vast majority of American viewers, of course, but I’m surprised no neocon reviewer has brought attention to it, with the usual recommendation: that failure of the New Republic to completely vanquish the Empire led to a continuation of hostilities. (FWIW, the Disney animated series Star Wars Rebel has an episode where the Empire exterminates the Geonossians by, you guessed it, poison gas.)

    the Empire representing Wilhemite Germany

    Headscratch.

    How can the Empire represent Wilhemine Germany? There aren’t even any Social Democrats, a non-absolutist Monarch or a Reichstag. Nor are there large rivals west and east of the Galaxy.

    Only neocons and ahistorical Hollywood writers can up with that kind of stuff.

    Nope, the Empire is an totalitarian structure lead by a Dark-Side Sorcerer who looks suspiciously Jewish, held together by fear of military power (mainly running on what could be considered Space Steampunk. Large cruisers / Ships of the line? Riding boots? Spik-and-Span militaristic drills? Guns that are being carried by hand?) One could write fun having sidestories about how the more fanatic elite revolutionary guards are playing political games against the old-school military types.

    failure of the New Republic to completely vanquish the Empire led to a continuation of hostilities.

    I wonder in what universe Wilhelmine Germany was not totally and completely vanquished. It was basically a Pinata, burnt down and being asked to hand out the gimmedats.

    Quick update:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Palpatine was a good deal harsher than the Kaiser, no doubt. But the Galactic Empire did feel the need to retain some trappings of the old Republic like the Senate, at least for administrative purposes. And there were prominent individuals (like Organa and his daughter) who had enough popular support that they could not be simply arrested without cause, even if they were regarded as unreliable. It was not until the Death Star was completed that the Empire could rule purely by terror, so they were not quite as totalitarian as assumed, though clearly brutal.

    At the end of the Galactic Civil War the Empire survived as a rump state with limitations on their ability to rearm, which they flouted. Lonely voices for action were ignored until the rise of the explicitly militaristic First Order. And this is precisely the neocon view of the interwar period: Versailles was too lenient, not too harsh, and paved the way to Munich.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    I did not know Star wars was sci fi. Interestingly, they do not even try to make movies based upon Azimov especially Foundation series. Star Wars original book is unreadable. Total garbage. I tried to read it long time ago without much success.

    Interestingly, they do not even try to make movies based upon Azimov especially Foundation series.

    What about I Robot?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Miro23
    I don't know who Carl Schmitt was, but "No law exists outside the reality of power" surely explains what's going on. It's the capture of US centers of power by Jewish-Zionist activists enabling a race war against Anglo Americans.

    It’s as Carl Schmitt said of the nature of law and power. No law exists outside the reality of power. Basic laws are vaguely worded, and it is the Power that decides the meaning and force of those words. So, when Jews gained control of US culture and jurisprudence, the Constitution came to mean Open Borders, Diversity, Anti-White Dogma(to enforce white submissivism necessary to serve Jewish dominance), and ‘Gay Marriage’. Americanism and Constitutionalism were always shaped and determined by the Power. After all, what is Free Speech? Jews once used to say Free Speech means all speech, from far right to far left, should be free. Back then, Jews feared censorship of Jewish radicalism and pornography(big profits for Jews) by traditional Christian power. But once Jews gained supreme power in the US, they came to fear Free Speech as criticism of Jewish Power. Therefore, Jews redefined Free Speech as excluding ‘hate speech’. Since Jewish Power controls the meaning of ‘hate speech’, Zionist speech(that demeans Palestinians) is not ‘hate speech’, but BDS speech that calls for justice for Palestinians must be criminalized as ‘hate’. The Power decides what is ‘hate’, and that means Jewish elites with supreme power in the US get to denounce and suppress certain speech as ‘hateful’.
     
    Exactly right.

    But once Jews gained control of the Constitution, the US came to be all about ISRAEL FIRST, favoring Zionists over all other peoples(esp. the Palestinians), Open Borders Immigration to turn whites into a minority, and etc. The Constitution now serves the interests of Zionist-Supremacism. And since Jews have chosen Homomania as the proxy agent of Jewish Globalism, the Worship of Homos and Trannies has become the new Christianity or Queertianity. The Christian Church is like the Constitution. In the end, it will be what those in power say it’s about. The Power decides and molds & twists the presumed core principles to its will.
     
    And the best explanation ever of religion:

    In the end, the Power decides the meaning of anything. This was true of how Christianity got started. It developed as a branch or heresy of Judaism. Jews denounced Christianity as a violation of the true meaning of God in the Torah and Jewish tradition. How dare these gentiles take something from Jews and change the meanings to make God serve gentiles than Jews? According to the original spirit of the Torah, God cannot be manifest in human form. And God’s Covenant is with Jews, not with all of humanity. But Christianity had Jesus as Son of God, a human figure walking among mankind. And Christianity said the new covenant is with all of humanity. In the end, it didn’t matter how much Jews protested. The fact is when the idea of God passed over to Christian and later Muslim gentiles, they changed or twisted the principles to serve their own interests and agendas. Jewish concept of God was limited only to spaces in which Jews had the power. In gentile spaces where Christians and Muslims had control over the idea of God, His meaning and design could be altered, even drastically, to serve interests inimical to Jews.
     
    Also, the interesting point that Jews have taken over the Establishment, which should have been enough for control (until recently). But now they're having unforeseen trouble with the flood of digital information washing around their power structure, so they're having to enlist the help of their allies at Facebook, Google etc.

    However, to really make this work, they need a US internet firewall (commercially bad for Facebook and Google), and they have to physically remove dissidents from society (not so easy). In other words they now need pure Totalitarianism - which is a whole different story - and it's going to be obvious what's happening to all the Rest of the World and even the dumbest Americans.

    But that doesn't mean that they won't do it.

    They'll still go for it, because they have to, with some sort of manufactured Emergency, calling for a COG (Continuity of Government) Dictatorship. In fact, they're probably working on it right now.

    Carl Schmitt was the ‘Crown Jurist” in Germany who ‘justified’ Hitler’s assent to power, arguing that the response to the ‘Reichstag Fire’ required the utilization of “Emergency Powers” hence paving the way to dictatorship.

    It was Schmitt who influenced the “NeoCons” many of whom had studied with a philosophy professor Leo Strauss, whom was a devotee of Martin Heidegger, the existentialist philosopher who brought Schmitt into the Nazi Party. Strauss corresponded with Schmitt and was influenced by the example that takes a perversion of philosophy into the real political realm in order to excuse a power grab. It was Strauss who taught that philosophy contained inner secrets of interpretation that was taught only to a chosen elite, where the basis of that secret was that lies were permissible to that elite to serve the power needs of that elite.

    Thus 9/11 was the emergency used by, and created by, the Neoconservatives, for the rise to power utilizing ‘Emergency Powers’ for a dictatorship that would wage perpetual war, based on lies, to stay in power.

    Essays in this collection by LaRouchePac, ‘The Children of Satan” goes into further detail on this, including the destruction of culture by the allied forces of these elites that run the ‘entertainment industries’ in part III of the Children of Satan. on the ‘Congress for Cultural Freedom’ project more properly referred to as in the publication as ‘The Sexual Congress for Cultural Fascism”

    https://archive.larouchepac.com/files/child_satan_book_0.pdf

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    Thus 9/11 was the emergency used by, and created by, the Neoconservatives, for the rise to power utilizing ‘Emergency Powers’ for a dictatorship that would wage perpetual war, based on lies, to stay in power.
     
    Exactly right - but it failed (on the domestic US side) and we are living in the messy aftermath. The Neocons planned to hold absolute power after 9/11.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @KenH
    Amazon is working on a LOTR series that occurs in a time frame before The Hobbit took place, so I assume it might be based on The Silmarillion. If they take cues from Disney then we'll be treated to black wizards and elves, women warriors, maybe some homosexual characters, wicked white men from Gondor and chivalrous Orcs with English accents and perhaps some other SJW themes will be injected into the original story.

    For whatever reason Peter Jackson felt compelled to add completely out-of-place non-whites as residents of Lake Town in the Hobbit movies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH
    I remember Peter Jackson getting shamed and guilt tripped over the LOTR not having any of the requisite diversity (((Hollywood))) demands in movies. So in an apparent attempt to virtue signal and atone for this grievous infraction he threw in a couple of Negresses and Asians at Lake Town in The Hobbit trilogy, but they had no speaking part. However, they'll probably be the main characters when Disney purchases the rights and rolls out the remake in 2030.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @KenH
    Amazon is working on a LOTR series that occurs in a time frame before The Hobbit took place, so I assume it might be based on The Silmarillion. If they take cues from Disney then we'll be treated to black wizards and elves, women warriors, maybe some homosexual characters, wicked white men from Gondor and chivalrous Orcs with English accents and perhaps some other SJW themes will be injected into the original story.

    black wizards and elves

    I have seen everything, now I can die in peace.

    Would it be cultural misappropriation to pull in Hougans and Mambos if hailing frequencies to the etherworld need to be opened?

    (This reminds me that William Gibson somehow introduced Loas into his mid-00s writings, which somehow pretty cool)

    Read More
    • LOL: KenH
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Hollywood needs to be destroyed, before it causes more damage to young minds.
    Maybe 1/10 movies might be okay, but it ifs so low might as well get rid of it.

    Hollywood is basically largely a Jewish empire.

    Peter Myers has this quote:
    Some whites are now saying, if only we were more like the Jews, we’d be ok. The Jews are racist, so we should be racist and separatist like them. Wrong! The problem is in the mind, not the body.

    A lot of natoinalist minded people have allied themselves with Zionists (the National Conservative parties in Visegrad, a lot of the altlite/altright).

    When the counter culture revolution of the 1960s happened, Christianity was separated.
    And many whites lost themselves and now we are split. Are we Aryans? Christians? Both?

    White elites loved money and hence became dependant on Jews, who divided Europeans.

    You get the two sides Globalists (ally with money hungry, internationalists who want to destroy us in the name of “unity” with Jewish money, or Zionists with money, who want you to ally with them or they destroy you). Everyone is scrambling for the money.

    Mad times.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Here’s the reality of why the current crop of movies is losing at the box office. They are intensely
    NOT- entertaining. Why are they so mind-numbingly boring? How can studios stay in business while producing box office bombs? Because central banks, the deep state, and globalists give billions of dollars at almost zero percent interest loans to studios and their ultimate owners … and the tiny interest can be paid for with more loans, etc, etc, etc. This con / scam provides free money for the elitists agendas. The studios can then buy their own stock making it go up. The studios are thereby financially rewarded for producing box office bombs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    The movie industry doesn’t depend on the American box office at all. It makes it’s money in the international market.

    That’s hundreds of millions of low paid third world men who just love the special effects , cartoonish explosions, car chases and all the rest.

    Plus it’s an industry where everybody gets paid long before the movies are finished and on the market.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.