The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / On "Cuckservative"
 All Comments / On "Cuckservative"
    A few days ago, the Heritage Foundation named a long-serving member of its board, a black woman, as the new president of the organization [Heritage Foundation taps Kay Coles James to be next president, by Nolan McCaskill and Eliana Johnson, Politico, December 19, 2017]. The old joke comes to mind: “What do you call a...
  • Are they really going to have the Rock play Doc Savage? The world’s smartest super hero played by a pro “rassler”?

    Also, didn’t the movie Idiocracy show a black pro “rassler” becoming dictator of the whole world?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Alden
    I’ve only seen him in TV ads for his movies. I think his muscles are silicon implants and his slim waist a product of liposuction. He looks more like a robot than a human.

    Aldey, you and Atilla would both be all over that like a $20 dress.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Can you smeeeeeeelll what the Rock is cooking? Its the candy ass Lincoln Party.

    Cooked Goose.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • He’s an ex athlete and a performer. He seems charming and I happen to have Samoan friends. He is probably fun at parties or a barbeque but that’s hardly a reason to consider him for office.

    I’d rather have him inside the tent pissing out than pissing in but there’s no reason to make him president of anything. He probably considers himself more Samoan than black, he couldn’t play a black nationalist very convincingly on wwf. My guess is that if we had conservative democrats he’d be one. We don’t really any more so he’s a republican.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Ohhh wow . . .

    There’s something new. White people, notably of the elite variety, selecting a black woman to head some elite organization.

    Uhhhhh it’s not new, it’s not unique and it is typical color manufacturing, so as hide the bankruptcy the organization cynical color game.

    I have no doubt that she is qualified and able, but one has to wonder in all of the organization’s history — there’s only been one and only a female . . . suspect.

    It’s called seasoning.

    ——————-

    I am completely unfamiliar with Mr Johnson as a conservative. An actor whose movies I have enjoyed — but as a conservative – unknown to me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The cucks are always looking for blacks and browns who appear conservative on the surface who they can hold up as a shining example that conservatism transcends race. At one time Rush Limbaugh had a man crush on Charles Barkley because he made some conservative sounding utterances and occasionally dissented from the anti-white musings of his more militant “bruthas”.

    But Chaz is now back on the reservation with his recent campaigning for Doug Jones and imploring Doug and the Democrats to do something for black people.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Z-man
    'Cuckservative David French', that says it all, methinks he might be a gay cuck also. LOL

    We love to throw that term around but,by jiminy,David French is a real full metal cuck!

    Read More
    • LOL: Z-man
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Heros
    I am delighted to see that this is the same Paul Kersey from SBPDL. His great site was behind a paywall for a while, and now it has been opened once again. Thank you Paul, whoever you are.

    Kersey is a very witty race-realist, except when it comes to one self-chosen race. Plus he often cannot seem to break out of that US propaganda bubble. He is way over focused on sports (like Sailer) and other superficial and distracting shiny objects, so he cannot discern many greater truths.

    You make a good point about Mr. Kersey and the chosen. I know he is a Southerner but I don’t recall him ever talking about his religious background. This is important and I hope he comments about this. This would give a better perspective as to how to deal with the chosen. He does podcasts on AmRen with Jared Taylor. AmRen is easy on the Jews and this has caused controversy among rightists, nationalists, etc. I don’t buy into the “blame the Jews for everything” craziness. But they do have to go to Israel and Jews cannot be a part of any political offices in the West. This is why I support the state of Israel.

    As for Mr. Kersey’s focusing on sports, this is actually working out well. The NFL/NBA has collapsed. Whites have abandoned these games which is a great boost to Western movements. It is fascinating to watch 2 multi-billion dollar businesses collapse with no one mentioning the reason for the collapse: the negrification of these sports. Negrophiliacs like Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck are very unhappy about this. They blame many factors except for the race factor. Now that this collapse has happened, Mr. Kersey will have to move on to other organizations. These would be the RCC and the Zioevangizers. But this is only possible if we know something about Mr. Kersey’s religious background. These 2 groups (along with the Freemasons) are the ones causing havoc in the West with their support of the chosen and immigration of third world peoples to the West.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Identity politics and counter-identity politics only get you so far. I’m sure Johnson as a Republican would attract more black and Hispanic voters than Trump, but not enough to make a big difference at election time. Most Hispanic and black voters vote Democrat out of clear economic self-interest: they are poorer than whites and its logical for low-income minorities to vote for more government spending. Whatever candidate the Republicans run, they can’t get around this problem.

    The ideal black candidate would be left-wing on welfare and right-wing on immigration, an almost impossible combination in a right-wing liberal country like the US.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Alden
    I’ve only seen him in TV ads for his movies. I think his muscles are silicon implants and his slim waist a product of liposuction. He looks more like a robot than a human.

    Well, maybe he has no balls after all. But if he does, he won’t have the resources of an Arnold to buy up all the gossip press to keep a lid on his love children. All those big Hollywood guys seem to have some serious skeletons in the closet that would make them unelectable under “contemporary standards”. Have 5 kids by 5 different guys, or be a [female] prostitute, and you’re a role model. Screw a [female] intern once, you’re a predator.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Alden
    Can’t you go back to occidental observer Betty?

    You might have more readers if you used paragraphs.

    This “Betty” about whom you comment, was she not barred from OCC? Does Pierre de Craon miss her?

    I will make note of your grammatical advice regarding paragraphs. Once I start typing, it’s a keystroke stream of consciousness and I just have to get everything out before my thought processes are interrupted. I try to proofread but I have a life and always have other things to do. The most important thing is get out ideas to help the West.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Rich
    There is no such thing as a black conservative. Just because Thomas Sowell appeared to have an understanding of conservatism, doesn't mean there are any others out there. I know hard core Christian, church going blacks, who would vote for Lucifer if he was a democrat, will vote pro-abortion democrat, pro-illegal alien democrat, even former KKK democrat, before they will ever vote for anyone on the republican ticket. Blacks belong to the democrat party, repubs have to give it up. The Sailer strategy is the only one that can work for the republicans, but their leaders, in many cases, are afraid to use it. It took an outsider like Trump to ride it to victory.

    sowell is a zionist bootlick.
    automatically disqualified from anything
    except bootlicking.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The guy is a steroid user so he’s a fake muscleman. Pro wrestling is fake so he’s a fake on that score. Acting is also faking it so notch another one. He’s a fake conservative and a fake white man so he’s been counterfeit all the way for his entire life.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Polish Perspective
    I'm happy Unz is publishing Kersey. One of the better dissident right writers out there. His work on "hidden figures" was legendary and even the MSM was forced to adress it - though of course claiming he was just a hateful bigot and trying extremely hard to avoid a factual discussion, since they knew they would lose that debate.

    As regards Mr. Johnson, vaguely black characters who are comfortable in a neoliberal system while supporting leftist social ideals do appear to be the favourite of the donor class. Look at Corey Booker or Kamala Harris. You use their race to appeal to people's basest identity instincts but you can be certain that they will never challenge the economic system which their donors depend on to accumulate wealth even as the average American barely sees any real wage increases(adjusted for inflation) and debt due to education and healthcare accelerates.

    If Trump loses in 2020 and multi-racial democrat (like Harris or Johnson) wins, then you can expect them to spend a lot more time on BLM and a lot less on oligarchy. Just as Clinton in 2016 went all in on identity politics, even as she was fundraising off from Wall Street.

    The cuckservative response has been to decry identity politics and issue bland statements that we "must all come together". Of course this rhetoric only really works on whites, and especially conservative whites, who want to avoid thinking about race to the greatest extent that they can. But this is why Trump is likely the last GOP president. He already lost the popular vote and only became elected due to the quirks of the electoral system. His actions in his 1st year has shown him to be a meek carboncopy of the GOP establishment. If he understands the importance of demographics, he certainly doesn't show it in his actions.

    One way to think about him is to say that he's the national version of Pete Wilson, the California governor who was the last Republican in that state and actually got serious about illegal immigration and the like. But it was too late at that point. California in many ways is a bellwether for America. The only difference is that whereas in California, the remaining democrat governors were all white men, on a national level we're more likely to see vaguely multiracial/black characters like Harris, Johnson or Booker. And the cuckservatives will pretend that the only reason the democrats now rule is because "we didn't do outreach enough" instead of the elephant in the room: immigration policy.

    If he (Trump) understands the importance of demographics, he certainly doesn’t show it in his actions.

    That’s right. Like many baby boomers he isn’t much bothered by the racial transformation that mass third world immigration has wrought and what it portends for his own people. And as a radical egalitarian he erroneously thinks that a thriving economy will remedy interracial strife and other social ills. So we’ll just be Brazil with a slightly better economy.

    Princess Ivanka was tweeting recently about how happy she was that Latino unemployment had dropped and I’m sure she made daddy really proud with that tweet. Expressing any concern about white unemployment would be “white supremacy and racial intolerance” in white privileged America.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Polish Perspective
    I'm happy Unz is publishing Kersey. One of the better dissident right writers out there. His work on "hidden figures" was legendary and even the MSM was forced to adress it - though of course claiming he was just a hateful bigot and trying extremely hard to avoid a factual discussion, since they knew they would lose that debate.

    As regards Mr. Johnson, vaguely black characters who are comfortable in a neoliberal system while supporting leftist social ideals do appear to be the favourite of the donor class. Look at Corey Booker or Kamala Harris. You use their race to appeal to people's basest identity instincts but you can be certain that they will never challenge the economic system which their donors depend on to accumulate wealth even as the average American barely sees any real wage increases(adjusted for inflation) and debt due to education and healthcare accelerates.

    If Trump loses in 2020 and multi-racial democrat (like Harris or Johnson) wins, then you can expect them to spend a lot more time on BLM and a lot less on oligarchy. Just as Clinton in 2016 went all in on identity politics, even as she was fundraising off from Wall Street.

    The cuckservative response has been to decry identity politics and issue bland statements that we "must all come together". Of course this rhetoric only really works on whites, and especially conservative whites, who want to avoid thinking about race to the greatest extent that they can. But this is why Trump is likely the last GOP president. He already lost the popular vote and only became elected due to the quirks of the electoral system. His actions in his 1st year has shown him to be a meek carboncopy of the GOP establishment. If he understands the importance of demographics, he certainly doesn't show it in his actions.

    One way to think about him is to say that he's the national version of Pete Wilson, the California governor who was the last Republican in that state and actually got serious about illegal immigration and the like. But it was too late at that point. California in many ways is a bellwether for America. The only difference is that whereas in California, the remaining democrat governors were all white men, on a national level we're more likely to see vaguely multiracial/black characters like Harris, Johnson or Booker. And the cuckservatives will pretend that the only reason the democrats now rule is because "we didn't do outreach enough" instead of the elephant in the room: immigration policy.

    I am delighted to see that this is the same Paul Kersey from SBPDL. His great site was behind a paywall for a while, and now it has been opened once again. Thank you Paul, whoever you are.

    Kersey is a very witty race-realist, except when it comes to one self-chosen race. Plus he often cannot seem to break out of that US propaganda bubble. He is way over focused on sports (like Sailer) and other superficial and distracting shiny objects, so he cannot discern many greater truths.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    You make a good point about Mr. Kersey and the chosen. I know he is a Southerner but I don't recall him ever talking about his religious background. This is important and I hope he comments about this. This would give a better perspective as to how to deal with the chosen. He does podcasts on AmRen with Jared Taylor. AmRen is easy on the Jews and this has caused controversy among rightists, nationalists, etc. I don't buy into the "blame the Jews for everything" craziness. But they do have to go to Israel and Jews cannot be a part of any political offices in the West. This is why I support the state of Israel.

    As for Mr. Kersey's focusing on sports, this is actually working out well. The NFL/NBA has collapsed. Whites have abandoned these games which is a great boost to Western movements. It is fascinating to watch 2 multi-billion dollar businesses collapse with no one mentioning the reason for the collapse: the negrification of these sports. Negrophiliacs like Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck are very unhappy about this. They blame many factors except for the race factor. Now that this collapse has happened, Mr. Kersey will have to move on to other organizations. These would be the RCC and the Zioevangizers. But this is only possible if we know something about Mr. Kersey's religious background. These 2 groups (along with the Freemasons) are the ones causing havoc in the West with their support of the chosen and immigration of third world peoples to the West.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @attilathehen
    Bingo!!! I can blame the Jews for many things, but big picture there is always an RCC/Zioevangizer/Freemason behind them giving them their "power." I had an ephiphany several years ago and realized that it was these 3 who are causing our problems. As I have consistently stated, the most evil, oxymoronic belief - universal brotherhood - is what is destroying the West. Universal brotherhood comes into direct conflict with IQ (which is tied to race). The left is easy to understand because they work against the natural law and devolve into degeneracy. But the "right" is a bit more complicated. Cucks would go on about individualism, personal responsibility, freedom of association, the uniqueness of the individual. But this came into conflict for me one day when I was at a church service and I thought there was a black priest saying the mass. It was a dark-skinned East Indian (he had an accent). But this jarred me. I had never had a black/Asian priest at any mass I attended and it didn't sit well with me. I began to question my beliefs and realized I could not accept black/Asian priests-popes. Then I read portions of the Bell Curve and made me realize that IQ is the beginning point of everything. I always understand about differences in intelligence. Where I lived we knew blacks/Asians were not as smart as Caucasians. This brought biology into conflict with beliefs. That is why I now state, biology first, then beliefs. Then looking at the West and its development we can see that only Caucasians/Europeans were the ones who created it. Jews/blacks/Asians had nothing to do with it. The Jewish question will bring out the 2 types of people: the Christian cucks who still believe Jews are the chosen and the trad RCCers/Neo-Nazis who blame the Jews for everything. These groups are easily dealt with. First, from a religious perspective, their covenant with God ended with the destruction of the temple in 70 A.D. As far as the Nazis, Hitler was against the Bolshevik Jews in Russia and wanted to prevent a union with German Jews and a take over of Germany. Though Hitler was defeated in WWII, the Bolshevik problem was gradually solved with a now nationalist Russia. Let's put a time perspective into this also. Up until Vatican II, the world was a large, still difficult to travel globe. But now with international flights so common the world has literally shrunk. Today's cucks, Neo-Nazis can't deal with this. They are focused on a long gone past and refuse to deal with the most dangerous present. This dangerous present can be summed up in 2 words: IQ, which is tied to race. It is also the sum of world history but we can deal with this later. So at this point in time we can see that the West is best. When we look at the peoples who created this West, we can see the 3 groups that are missing: Jews/blacks/Asians. Here is crux of the problem because it means the end of "universal church" and "universal brotherhood." It is the "right" that is melting down because it cannot handle these realities. Leftists are very degenerate and cannot think logically. The right can think logically, but it refuses to deal with reality. Cucks won't say Islam is a Christian heresy because most Muslims are black/Asian. Cucks won't say Jews no longer have a covenant with God because they're afraid of being called Nazis. So, since cucks refuse to deal with reality here is what will happen. The West will have to face its "Year Zero," "Year One" around 2020. The RCC will be mostly gone in the USA. There will be no rapture for the Zioevangizers so they will have to rethink their beliefs. We will no longer be able to believe that education for anyone with an IQ of less than 89 will have a salutary effect on them. This is why dealing with cucks is the most important issue facing us. I'll name names in another comment.

    Can’t you go back to occidental observer Betty?

    You might have more readers if you used paragraphs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    This "Betty" about whom you comment, was she not barred from OCC? Does Pierre de Craon miss her?

    I will make note of your grammatical advice regarding paragraphs. Once I start typing, it's a keystroke stream of consciousness and I just have to get everything out before my thought processes are interrupted. I try to proofread but I have a life and always have other things to do. The most important thing is get out ideas to help the West.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @attilathehen
    Mr. Kersey as usual nails it. This David French cuck is the root of our problems and these cucks will be the death of the West if they are not stopped. French imported an Ethiopian girl so there is a reason for his negritude (as if the USA is running out of blacks to adopt). He needs role models for this adoptee. These cucks are willing to destroy the West to help blacks/Asians feel better about themselves in the West. They will never feel better in the West because they had nothing to do with the creation of the West and will never fit in. The three most dangerous persons in the West are the Caucasian RCC male who accepts black/Asians priest-popes, the Caucasian male Zioevangizer who believes Jews are the chosen and the gentile Freemason who believes in universal brotherhood. These 3 stooges must be made to face the reality of race and IQ and why separation/deportation/repatriation is needed. Western culture becomes more degraded day by day. This Jumanji remake is a perfect example. Blacks/Asians contributed nothing to Western culture so their "stories" have no place in the West. Hence, remakes or turning white characters black/Asian, a white-washing of the our past. At the Vatican, on this most holy day, cuck poop Frannie was blathering about accepting migrants. This is not the meaning of Christmas. He did nothing about the "gay Nativity" in St. Peter' Square. Affirmative action sainthood for blacks/Asians moves briskly. I'm a cradle RCCer who left the RCC because I don't accept black/Asian priests-popes. I follow RCC news because the RCC is causing so many problems in the USA and Western Europe.

    We are lucky to have Trump as our president, but we need to look beyond 2020 and find potential leaders who will build on what Trump is doing.

    Hennie, You might enjoy “Jesus Has Two Daddies”…..4.5 stars over at Amazon books. Chronicles the heartwarming saga of Tom and Tod as they start a family in the birthplace of the Republican Party. Remember to wash down your blood pressure pills with three fingers before turning the first page……..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Alden
    Hi there Betty.

    Can you handle the truth?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @attilathehen
    You strike me as a website commentator stalker. Can you handle the truth?

    Hi there Betty.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Can you handle the truth?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jonathan Revusky
    When is the author of this vacuous article (along with the rest of the like-minded dumbasses) going to realize that it doesn't matter whether the president is a half Samoan, half black professional wrestler OR a Hispanic lesbian OR anything else... IF...

    the policies never change!!!

    (It's a rhetorical question. I know the answer... NEVER....)

    (((Jonathan Revusky)))??? Trump is changing policies.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Most of the commenters here are cucks at heart . A good portion spend most of their time whining about the mistreatment of the same Muslims who would chop off their head if given half a chance . Their hatred of Jews is at such a manic level that they have lowered themselves to be cheerleaders for Muslims just for the hope that Muslims can do a job they are incapable of , as they are too impotent and atrophied to put the internet down for a while.

    Bingo!!! I can blame the Jews for many things, but big picture there is always an RCC/Zioevangizer/Freemason behind them giving them their “power.” I had an ephiphany several years ago and realized that it was these 3 who are causing our problems. As I have consistently stated, the most evil, oxymoronic belief – universal brotherhood – is what is destroying the West. Universal brotherhood comes into direct conflict with IQ (which is tied to race). The left is easy to understand because they work against the natural law and devolve into degeneracy. But the “right” is a bit more complicated. Cucks would go on about individualism, personal responsibility, freedom of association, the uniqueness of the individual. But this came into conflict for me one day when I was at a church service and I thought there was a black priest saying the mass. It was a dark-skinned East Indian (he had an accent). But this jarred me. I had never had a black/Asian priest at any mass I attended and it didn’t sit well with me. I began to question my beliefs and realized I could not accept black/Asian priests-popes. Then I read portions of the Bell Curve and made me realize that IQ is the beginning point of everything. I always understand about differences in intelligence. Where I lived we knew blacks/Asians were not as smart as Caucasians. This brought biology into conflict with beliefs. That is why I now state, biology first, then beliefs. Then looking at the West and its development we can see that only Caucasians/Europeans were the ones who created it. Jews/blacks/Asians had nothing to do with it. The Jewish question will bring out the 2 types of people: the Christian cucks who still believe Jews are the chosen and the trad RCCers/Neo-Nazis who blame the Jews for everything. These groups are easily dealt with. First, from a religious perspective, their covenant with God ended with the destruction of the temple in 70 A.D. As far as the Nazis, Hitler was against the Bolshevik Jews in Russia and wanted to prevent a union with German Jews and a take over of Germany. Though Hitler was defeated in WWII, the Bolshevik problem was gradually solved with a now nationalist Russia. Let’s put a time perspective into this also. Up until Vatican II, the world was a large, still difficult to travel globe. But now with international flights so common the world has literally shrunk. Today’s cucks, Neo-Nazis can’t deal with this. They are focused on a long gone past and refuse to deal with the most dangerous present. This dangerous present can be summed up in 2 words: IQ, which is tied to race. It is also the sum of world history but we can deal with this later. So at this point in time we can see that the West is best. When we look at the peoples who created this West, we can see the 3 groups that are missing: Jews/blacks/Asians. Here is crux of the problem because it means the end of “universal church” and “universal brotherhood.” It is the “right” that is melting down because it cannot handle these realities. Leftists are very degenerate and cannot think logically. The right can think logically, but it refuses to deal with reality. Cucks won’t say Islam is a Christian heresy because most Muslims are black/Asian. Cucks won’t say Jews no longer have a covenant with God because they’re afraid of being called Nazis. So, since cucks refuse to deal with reality here is what will happen. The West will have to face its “Year Zero,” “Year One” around 2020. The RCC will be mostly gone in the USA. There will be no rapture for the Zioevangizers so they will have to rethink their beliefs. We will no longer be able to believe that education for anyone with an IQ of less than 89 will have a salutary effect on them. This is why dealing with cucks is the most important issue facing us. I’ll name names in another comment.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Can’t you go back to occidental observer Betty?

    You might have more readers if you used paragraphs.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • When is the author of this vacuous article (along with the rest of the like-minded dumbasses) going to realize that it doesn’t matter whether the president is a half Samoan, half black professional wrestler OR a Hispanic lesbian OR anything else… IF…

    the policies never change!!!

    (It’s a rhetorical question. I know the answer… NEVER….)

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    (((Jonathan Revusky)))??? Trump is changing policies.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Alden
    You are the person who used to post as Betty on the occidental observer

    You strike me as a website commentator stalker. Can you handle the truth?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Hi there Betty.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen
    Ron Paul is a cuck just like Rand. They would never do anything like what Trump is doing.

    Most of the commenters here are cucks at heart . A good portion spend most of their time whining about the mistreatment of the same Muslims who would chop off their head if given half a chance . Their hatred of Jews is at such a manic level that they have lowered themselves to be cheerleaders for Muslims just for the hope that Muslims can do a job they are incapable of , as they are too impotent and atrophied to put the internet down for a while.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Bingo!!! I can blame the Jews for many things, but big picture there is always an RCC/Zioevangizer/Freemason behind them giving them their "power." I had an ephiphany several years ago and realized that it was these 3 who are causing our problems. As I have consistently stated, the most evil, oxymoronic belief - universal brotherhood - is what is destroying the West. Universal brotherhood comes into direct conflict with IQ (which is tied to race). The left is easy to understand because they work against the natural law and devolve into degeneracy. But the "right" is a bit more complicated. Cucks would go on about individualism, personal responsibility, freedom of association, the uniqueness of the individual. But this came into conflict for me one day when I was at a church service and I thought there was a black priest saying the mass. It was a dark-skinned East Indian (he had an accent). But this jarred me. I had never had a black/Asian priest at any mass I attended and it didn't sit well with me. I began to question my beliefs and realized I could not accept black/Asian priests-popes. Then I read portions of the Bell Curve and made me realize that IQ is the beginning point of everything. I always understand about differences in intelligence. Where I lived we knew blacks/Asians were not as smart as Caucasians. This brought biology into conflict with beliefs. That is why I now state, biology first, then beliefs. Then looking at the West and its development we can see that only Caucasians/Europeans were the ones who created it. Jews/blacks/Asians had nothing to do with it. The Jewish question will bring out the 2 types of people: the Christian cucks who still believe Jews are the chosen and the trad RCCers/Neo-Nazis who blame the Jews for everything. These groups are easily dealt with. First, from a religious perspective, their covenant with God ended with the destruction of the temple in 70 A.D. As far as the Nazis, Hitler was against the Bolshevik Jews in Russia and wanted to prevent a union with German Jews and a take over of Germany. Though Hitler was defeated in WWII, the Bolshevik problem was gradually solved with a now nationalist Russia. Let's put a time perspective into this also. Up until Vatican II, the world was a large, still difficult to travel globe. But now with international flights so common the world has literally shrunk. Today's cucks, Neo-Nazis can't deal with this. They are focused on a long gone past and refuse to deal with the most dangerous present. This dangerous present can be summed up in 2 words: IQ, which is tied to race. It is also the sum of world history but we can deal with this later. So at this point in time we can see that the West is best. When we look at the peoples who created this West, we can see the 3 groups that are missing: Jews/blacks/Asians. Here is crux of the problem because it means the end of "universal church" and "universal brotherhood." It is the "right" that is melting down because it cannot handle these realities. Leftists are very degenerate and cannot think logically. The right can think logically, but it refuses to deal with reality. Cucks won't say Islam is a Christian heresy because most Muslims are black/Asian. Cucks won't say Jews no longer have a covenant with God because they're afraid of being called Nazis. So, since cucks refuse to deal with reality here is what will happen. The West will have to face its "Year Zero," "Year One" around 2020. The RCC will be mostly gone in the USA. There will be no rapture for the Zioevangizers so they will have to rethink their beliefs. We will no longer be able to believe that education for anyone with an IQ of less than 89 will have a salutary effect on them. This is why dealing with cucks is the most important issue facing us. I'll name names in another comment.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @attilathehen
    Mr. Kersey as usual nails it. This David French cuck is the root of our problems and these cucks will be the death of the West if they are not stopped. French imported an Ethiopian girl so there is a reason for his negritude (as if the USA is running out of blacks to adopt). He needs role models for this adoptee. These cucks are willing to destroy the West to help blacks/Asians feel better about themselves in the West. They will never feel better in the West because they had nothing to do with the creation of the West and will never fit in. The three most dangerous persons in the West are the Caucasian RCC male who accepts black/Asians priest-popes, the Caucasian male Zioevangizer who believes Jews are the chosen and the gentile Freemason who believes in universal brotherhood. These 3 stooges must be made to face the reality of race and IQ and why separation/deportation/repatriation is needed. Western culture becomes more degraded day by day. This Jumanji remake is a perfect example. Blacks/Asians contributed nothing to Western culture so their "stories" have no place in the West. Hence, remakes or turning white characters black/Asian, a white-washing of the our past. At the Vatican, on this most holy day, cuck poop Frannie was blathering about accepting migrants. This is not the meaning of Christmas. He did nothing about the "gay Nativity" in St. Peter' Square. Affirmative action sainthood for blacks/Asians moves briskly. I'm a cradle RCCer who left the RCC because I don't accept black/Asian priests-popes. I follow RCC news because the RCC is causing so many problems in the USA and Western Europe.

    We are lucky to have Trump as our president, but we need to look beyond 2020 and find potential leaders who will build on what Trump is doing.

    You are the person who used to post as Betty on the occidental observer

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    You strike me as a website commentator stalker. Can you handle the truth?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @headrick
    we might ask Ron Paul for some suggestions (not Rand)

    Ron Paul is a cuck just like Rand. They would never do anything like what Trump is doing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Most of the commenters here are cucks at heart . A good portion spend most of their time whining about the mistreatment of the same Muslims who would chop off their head if given half a chance . Their hatred of Jews is at such a manic level that they have lowered themselves to be cheerleaders for Muslims just for the hope that Muslims can do a job they are incapable of , as they are too impotent and atrophied to put the internet down for a while.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Mr. Kersey as usual nails it. This David French cuck is the root of our problems and these cucks will be the death of the West if they are not stopped. French imported an Ethiopian girl so there is a reason for his negritude (as if the USA is running out of blacks to adopt). He needs role models for this adoptee. These cucks are willing to destroy the West to help blacks/Asians feel better about themselves in the West. They will never feel better in the West because they had nothing to do with the creation of the West and will never fit in. The three most dangerous persons in the West are the Caucasian RCC male who accepts black/Asians priest-popes, the Caucasian male Zioevangizer who believes Jews are the chosen and the gentile Freemason who believes in universal brotherhood. These 3 stooges must be made to face the reality of race and IQ and why separation/deportation/repatriation is needed. Western culture becomes more degraded day by day. This Jumanji remake is a perfect example. Blacks/Asians contributed nothing to Western culture so their “stories” have no place in the West. Hence, remakes or turning white characters black/Asian, a white-washing of the our past. At the Vatican, on this most holy day, cuck poop Frannie was blathering about accepting migrants. This is not the meaning of Christmas. He did nothing about the “gay Nativity” in St. Peter’ Square. Affirmative action sainthood for blacks/Asians moves briskly. I’m a cradle RCCer who left the RCC because I don’t accept black/Asian priests-popes. I follow RCC news because the RCC is causing so many problems in the USA and Western Europe.

    We are lucky to have Trump as our president, but we need to look beyond 2020 and find potential leaders who will build on what Trump is doing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    You are the person who used to post as Betty on the occidental observer
    , @nsa
    Hennie, You might enjoy "Jesus Has Two Daddies".....4.5 stars over at Amazon books. Chronicles the heartwarming saga of Tom and Tod as they start a family in the birthplace of the Republican Party. Remember to wash down your blood pressure pills with three fingers before turning the first page........
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • we might ask Ron Paul for some suggestions (not Rand)

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Ron Paul is a cuck just like Rand. They would never do anything like what Trump is doing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Tulip
    Johnson is great, but how long before the thotpolice run him in for inappropriate conduct.

    You can't get that big without testosterone, and you can't have that much testosterone and not have some pissed off or jilted lover coming out the woodwork to tank you for fame and political gains.

    I think sexual harassment and all the puritanism are just a way of culling high-T men out of positions of power.

    I’ve only seen him in TV ads for his movies. I think his muscles are silicon implants and his slim waist a product of liposuction. He looks more like a robot than a human.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tulip
    Well, maybe he has no balls after all. But if he does, he won't have the resources of an Arnold to buy up all the gossip press to keep a lid on his love children. All those big Hollywood guys seem to have some serious skeletons in the closet that would make them unelectable under "contemporary standards". Have 5 kids by 5 different guys, or be a [female] prostitute, and you're a role model. Screw a [female] intern once, you're a predator.
    , @Truth
    Aldey, you and Atilla would both be all over that like a $20 dress.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Rich
    There is no such thing as a black conservative. Just because Thomas Sowell appeared to have an understanding of conservatism, doesn't mean there are any others out there. I know hard core Christian, church going blacks, who would vote for Lucifer if he was a democrat, will vote pro-abortion democrat, pro-illegal alien democrat, even former KKK democrat, before they will ever vote for anyone on the republican ticket. Blacks belong to the democrat party, repubs have to give it up. The Sailer strategy is the only one that can work for the republicans, but their leaders, in many cases, are afraid to use it. It took an outsider like Trump to ride it to victory.

    No the GOP leaders aren’t afraid to use it. The fact is the GOP is happy being a minority party as long as the bribe money rolls in for their votes. Why do you think they avoided the trade and immigration issues in their platforms even though they are real vote getters among whites? Because they don’t want to be a majority party, they just want the money. It’s the same reason why they repeatedly put up the most bland and generic old white guys they can find. They aren’t interested in winning, all they want is a seat at the table to get their bribe money.

    The Democrats and the GOP are merely two faces of the uniparty and the elite behind them that run the show.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Since only a fraction of Western Indo-European Man have viability, genetically speaking, for the establishment and thriving of a White Homeland, then, a priori, this is the only salvation for us. Split the Jew Ese into separate republics, with Whites who are citizens obtaining a per cent according to demographics. From that point on, with a unified, genetically fit herd, the new White Nation can rebuild the herd, minus the sick and useless DNA of the beta male sucks and Shabbos, and the slut Dumb Terminals on total external control.

    Within 30 years, the Bleck and Brown republics will be bankrupt and dissolute, enabling the White Republic to buy them out, piece by piece. All White men and women in the New Country will use the Singapore government model of governance as a basis template. Women will be revered and coveted for their real feminine traits and the epicentral family focus. Three children minimum is the axiom. No woman would be able to ascend the professional ladder without that strict requirement.

    Anything LESS than the above is a continuation of the Graveyard Death Spiral of An Airplane for Whites. The ground is rising up to meet us soon and our REAL Holocaust. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graveyard_spiral

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • He would also be the perfect president for the Democrats.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is no such thing as a black conservative. Just because Thomas Sowell appeared to have an understanding of conservatism, doesn’t mean there are any others out there. I know hard core Christian, church going blacks, who would vote for Lucifer if he was a democrat, will vote pro-abortion democrat, pro-illegal alien democrat, even former KKK democrat, before they will ever vote for anyone on the republican ticket. Blacks belong to the democrat party, repubs have to give it up. The Sailer strategy is the only one that can work for the republicans, but their leaders, in many cases, are afraid to use it. It took an outsider like Trump to ride it to victory.

    Read More
    • Agree: Alden
    • Replies: @Rod1963
    No the GOP leaders aren't afraid to use it. The fact is the GOP is happy being a minority party as long as the bribe money rolls in for their votes. Why do you think they avoided the trade and immigration issues in their platforms even though they are real vote getters among whites? Because they don't want to be a majority party, they just want the money. It's the same reason why they repeatedly put up the most bland and generic old white guys they can find. They aren't interested in winning, all they want is a seat at the table to get their bribe money.

    The Democrats and the GOP are merely two faces of the uniparty and the elite behind them that run the show.
    , @bjondo
    sowell is a zionist bootlick.
    automatically disqualified from anything
    except bootlicking.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • ‘Cuckservative David French’, that says it all, methinks he might be a gay cuck also. LOL

    Read More
    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
    We love to throw that term around but,by jiminy,David French is a real full metal cuck!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Johnson is great, but how long before the thotpolice run him in for inappropriate conduct.

    You can’t get that big without testosterone, and you can’t have that much testosterone and not have some pissed off or jilted lover coming out the woodwork to tank you for fame and political gains.

    I think sexual harassment and all the puritanism are just a way of culling high-T men out of positions of power.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    I’ve only seen him in TV ads for his movies. I think his muscles are silicon implants and his slim waist a product of liposuction. He looks more like a robot than a human.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The new Jumanji is more of a sequel than a reboot.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Samoans appear to be people who kiss up and kick down.
    More intelligent than Black Africans, but also more organised, and more dangerous.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I once chuckled to a friend after sitting in on a briefing that a bowl of Jello® could be President, because all that was required was for the head to tilt or wiggle in a given direction. The Rock would make a fine President: He’s good looking, personable, and he can reliably read the script, prompter or cue cards his deep-state masters would prepare for him. Restoring the Republic is so passé.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Merry Christmas!
    Lol to the “cucksersative”.
    Intelligent and well constructed.
    I can respect that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Personally I’ve always thought Johnson was a clown. He was a mediocre wrestler and his movies are a joke. In San Andreas I loved out loud at his two “daughters” when they appeared on the screen. It is inconceivable he could have produced two such white children.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I’m happy Unz is publishing Kersey. One of the better dissident right writers out there. His work on “hidden figures” was legendary and even the MSM was forced to adress it – though of course claiming he was just a hateful bigot and trying extremely hard to avoid a factual discussion, since they knew they would lose that debate.

    As regards Mr. Johnson, vaguely black characters who are comfortable in a neoliberal system while supporting leftist social ideals do appear to be the favourite of the donor class. Look at Corey Booker or Kamala Harris. You use their race to appeal to people’s basest identity instincts but you can be certain that they will never challenge the economic system which their donors depend on to accumulate wealth even as the average American barely sees any real wage increases(adjusted for inflation) and debt due to education and healthcare accelerates.

    If Trump loses in 2020 and multi-racial democrat (like Harris or Johnson) wins, then you can expect them to spend a lot more time on BLM and a lot less on oligarchy. Just as Clinton in 2016 went all in on identity politics, even as she was fundraising off from Wall Street.

    The cuckservative response has been to decry identity politics and issue bland statements that we “must all come together”. Of course this rhetoric only really works on whites, and especially conservative whites, who want to avoid thinking about race to the greatest extent that they can. But this is why Trump is likely the last GOP president. He already lost the popular vote and only became elected due to the quirks of the electoral system. His actions in his 1st year has shown him to be a meek carboncopy of the GOP establishment. If he understands the importance of demographics, he certainly doesn’t show it in his actions.

    One way to think about him is to say that he’s the national version of Pete Wilson, the California governor who was the last Republican in that state and actually got serious about illegal immigration and the like. But it was too late at that point. California in many ways is a bellwether for America. The only difference is that whereas in California, the remaining democrat governors were all white men, on a national level we’re more likely to see vaguely multiracial/black characters like Harris, Johnson or Booker. And the cuckservatives will pretend that the only reason the democrats now rule is because “we didn’t do outreach enough” instead of the elephant in the room: immigration policy.

    Read More
    • Agree: bomag
    • Replies: @Heros
    I am delighted to see that this is the same Paul Kersey from SBPDL. His great site was behind a paywall for a while, and now it has been opened once again. Thank you Paul, whoever you are.

    Kersey is a very witty race-realist, except when it comes to one self-chosen race. Plus he often cannot seem to break out of that US propaganda bubble. He is way over focused on sports (like Sailer) and other superficial and distracting shiny objects, so he cannot discern many greater truths.
    , @KenH

    If he (Trump) understands the importance of demographics, he certainly doesn’t show it in his actions.
     
    That's right. Like many baby boomers he isn't much bothered by the racial transformation that mass third world immigration has wrought and what it portends for his own people. And as a radical egalitarian he erroneously thinks that a thriving economy will remedy interracial strife and other social ills. So we'll just be Brazil with a slightly better economy.

    Princess Ivanka was tweeting recently about how happy she was that Latino unemployment had dropped and I'm sure she made daddy really proud with that tweet. Expressing any concern about white unemployment would be "white supremacy and racial intolerance" in white privileged America.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Just as mainstream wisdom on human psychology and evolution is filled with heaps of rubbish (rubbish which I've covered here extensively – see 200 Blog Posts – Everything You Need to Know (To Start)), the space of dissenting voices on this matter is also filled with its own share of rubbish – and worse. I've...
  • @Elementarsatz
    [Apologies for my English, it is not my mother tongue. Also, this post is all over the place.]

    "The fitness impact to a White man’s genes if his daughter marries a Black man is the same as if she married an unrelated White man (again, fitness from gene function notwithstanding)."

    This is reductionist and does not take into account that a national character exists. Descriptions of peoples ("Völker") have been stable throughout history, as german anthropologist Andreas Vonderach has shown in his work "Völkerpsychologie".

    (Arabs, for example, were hot-tempered and prone to violence even during ancient times, and recent findings have shown that 15.6% (!!) of Saudis have the genotype MAOA-2R. This is clear evidence for what german anthropologists call "Siebung". Also, the Hijab was known in the Middle East long before Islam started to appear, hinting to a high sexual drive of the muslim population living there. This is inline with our findings regarding "rapefugees" who are predominantly from these countries.)

    This means that on average, people of a Volk are embodying certain characteristics. Germans, for example, have been known throughout history for their chastity (way back to the German barbarians), their proclivity to tinker; their technical ability (even during the middle ages, as Montaigne noted), their tendency to being drawn to deep metaphysical speculation, their reflective nature (think of the German idealist philosophers), their drive to get behind "the nature of things", their faustian character and so on. A short essay of Vonderach deals with what defines being german objectively, from an anthropologist's standpoint: [0]. In this piece he also cites the fact that 64.4% of Germans can be classified as ethnic Germans by their genetic traits, the other 35.6% overlap with neighbouring states.

    Germany is a good example actually: Armin Mohler was perplexed that a country as culturally heterogenous as Germany was so staunchly united during WWII. And one of the reasons is the percentage cited above: most Germans looked alike and acted alike due to their shared tempereament and characteristics as well as their national character. If a national character did not exist, nationalism would be impossible. Vonderach goes into further detail regarding Germany's national character in his study "Die Deutschen Regionalcharaktere", where he makes the case that even different regional characters exist in Germany -- unfortunately, it's out of print.

    There is little to no reason for Europe to become "multicultural", or, as is rather the case, to become an ethno-cultural wasteland like the US, something that would more honestly be called "Rassamassa". And there is all reason for Europeans to now become nationalists defending the their people and culture against globalist One World lunatics. As Vox Day writes -- who does not get tired (rightly so) of pointing out that civic nationalism is false -- Europe is in better shape because people over here have unique identitarian cultures and see themselves as a distinct people, meaning that there are still left-overs of the solidarity of the different "Völker" that created the base for the European welfare states. We see this especially in eastern Europe, but the French are strong in this regard too; it was a Renaud Camus who coined the term "The Great Replacement", and it was the French who have been the first Identitarians. There is a reason that many Europeans don't get along, like the Germans and the Poles, or the Poles and the Russians, or the French and the Germans. It's because they are a distinct people with a distinct history and culture. Vonderach's magnum opus "Anthropologie Europas" deals precisley with this topic: the diveristy of the European peoples.

    Since it's already a culture shock for someone "immigrating" from northern Germany to the south of Germany, how would it ever be possible for someone from several thousand kilometers away to immigrate? It is impossible. It's only possible if your whole culture is based on cheap consumerism and tied together by a fat and expensive welfare state (which is basically bribing all those different non-European ethnicities in western Europe).

    The quote I used at the beginning of this post leads me to question the real motives of the blog author "JayMan". I gathered from reading that he is of mixed race, but lacks the objectivity a mixed race thinker like Theodore Beale brings to the table, because Beale understands that Europe is defined by distinct peoples, and that the current process of immigration and assimilation is a threat to the survival of Europe. I question the objecitivty precisley because the blog author also deals with Europe here, and, as written, Europe has no reason whatsoever to allow immigration. There has been Third World immigration to Germany only for the past 5 decades, it's nothing that can't be reversed, and polls show that the majority of Germans have been opposed to immigration during the 60's up to the present day. It's solely the wish of corrupt elites and economists who support this process of destruction. Every ethnic Italian has more right to Italy than anyone else on this planet; this is true for every country.

    I get the feeling that the author "JayMan" might indeed be sold on consumerism, and high culture is not really part of his life. That's fine, but then he must not use his influence to spread destructive ideas. He might not feel connected to a specific European culture, whereas I feel indebted to my Greco-Roman and Christian roots as well as to the vast canon of unique and high quality art, philosophy, classical music, literature and science that has been produced by Europeans; as a German, I feel especially connected to German culture, of course, and I have immersed myself in its culture for decades; few immigrants appreciate it. Again, consumerism. No matter if group selection is true or not, mass immigration and genetic assimilation would lead to the downfall of Europe and my culture. Again, if you support this, I question your motives. I question them especially since I've read posts by "JayMan" that are critical of mass immigration, and he is aware of the fate of the Portugese, as well as the Greeks and the southern Europeans, especially the Spanish. Up until several deaceds ago, central and northern Europe was spared non-European immigration, and due to this remaind wealthy and produced culture of high quality. The only immigrants that can be said to have had positive effects were the Ashkenazi Jews -- I will ignore the Culture of Critique for this post --, but you have to understand that they were only about .7% of the German population. And they were of high intelligence. That's the opposite of the Third World population western Europe is suffering from now.

    What I'm getting at is that the author of this blog post wants to paint being in favor of one's own culture, which includes one's own people, as right-wing extremists, as bigoted and as being on the wrong side of history. Europeans don't need to justify themselves if they vote for politicans who would limit or even completely disallow non-European immigration. In fact, the intergeneration contract forbids replacing your people, or initiating a process that would alter the demographics of your country severly. Even if we wanted to, we wouldn't be allowed to destroy the unique peoples and cultures of Europe. Mass immigration is not an act of nature, it can be stopped and reversed. And I hope Europeans start to wake up to reverse the damage that has been done -- but it might be too late already.

    The 16 points of the Alt Right that Vox Day wrote make this very clear, especially the last point. [1] We of the Alt Right support nationalists of every nation; but the Alt Right is against imperialism of any kind; it supports all nations becoming autonomous.

    I apologize for the length, but I want to provide those who visit this blog post with a saner perspective, and I want to make clear that defending your nation and opposing immigration of any kind is not a crime.

    [0]: http://sezession.de/37160/wir-selbst-anthropologisch.html
    [1]: https://voxday.blogspot.fr/2016/08/what-alt-right-is.html

    I want to provide those who visit this blog post with a saner perspective

    Before you can do any of that, you need to actually understand what I wrote. It doesn’t seem like you do.

    This entry is all about one thing, and one thing only: the existence of ethnic nepotism. That is, whether or not kin altruism led individuals to favor members of their own ethnic group over others. The answer of course is no. This is impossible, for the reasons stated within. All the rest of your talk about group characteristics and population replacement by immigration is completely tangential to this.

    “The fitness impact to a White man’s genes if his daughter marries a Black man is the same as if she married an unrelated White man (again, fitness from gene function notwithstanding).”

    This is reductionist

    Yes. This is a science blog. Reductionism is one of the key goals of science.

    and does not take into account that a national character exists.

    Nothing to do with it. See above. Read the statement again.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • [Apologies for my English, it is not my mother tongue. Also, this post is all over the place.]

    “The fitness impact to a White man’s genes if his daughter marries a Black man is the same as if she married an unrelated White man (again, fitness from gene function notwithstanding).”

    This is reductionist and does not take into account that a national character exists. Descriptions of peoples (“Völker”) have been stable throughout history, as german anthropologist Andreas Vonderach has shown in his work “Völkerpsychologie”.

    (Arabs, for example, were hot-tempered and prone to violence even during ancient times, and recent findings have shown that 15.6% (!!) of Saudis have the genotype MAOA-2R. This is clear evidence for what german anthropologists call “Siebung”. Also, the Hijab was known in the Middle East long before Islam started to appear, hinting to a high sexual drive of the muslim population living there. This is inline with our findings regarding “rapefugees” who are predominantly from these countries.)

    This means that on average, people of a Volk are embodying certain characteristics. Germans, for example, have been known throughout history for their chastity (way back to the German barbarians), their proclivity to tinker; their technical ability (even during the middle ages, as Montaigne noted), their tendency to being drawn to deep metaphysical speculation, their reflective nature (think of the German idealist philosophers), their drive to get behind “the nature of things”, their faustian character and so on. A short essay of Vonderach deals with what defines being german objectively, from an anthropologist’s standpoint: [0]. In this piece he also cites the fact that 64.4% of Germans can be classified as ethnic Germans by their genetic traits, the other 35.6% overlap with neighbouring states.

    Germany is a good example actually: Armin Mohler was perplexed that a country as culturally heterogenous as Germany was so staunchly united during WWII. And one of the reasons is the percentage cited above: most Germans looked alike and acted alike due to their shared tempereament and characteristics as well as their national character. If a national character did not exist, nationalism would be impossible. Vonderach goes into further detail regarding Germany’s national character in his study “Die Deutschen Regionalcharaktere”, where he makes the case that even different regional characters exist in Germany — unfortunately, it’s out of print.

    There is little to no reason for Europe to become “multicultural”, or, as is rather the case, to become an ethno-cultural wasteland like the US, something that would more honestly be called “Rassamassa”. And there is all reason for Europeans to now become nationalists defending the their people and culture against globalist One World lunatics. As Vox Day writes — who does not get tired (rightly so) of pointing out that civic nationalism is false — Europe is in better shape because people over here have unique identitarian cultures and see themselves as a distinct people, meaning that there are still left-overs of the solidarity of the different “Völker” that created the base for the European welfare states. We see this especially in eastern Europe, but the French are strong in this regard too; it was a Renaud Camus who coined the term “The Great Replacement”, and it was the French who have been the first Identitarians. There is a reason that many Europeans don’t get along, like the Germans and the Poles, or the Poles and the Russians, or the French and the Germans. It’s because they are a distinct people with a distinct history and culture. Vonderach’s magnum opus “Anthropologie Europas” deals precisley with this topic: the diveristy of the European peoples.

    Since it’s already a culture shock for someone “immigrating” from northern Germany to the south of Germany, how would it ever be possible for someone from several thousand kilometers away to immigrate? It is impossible. It’s only possible if your whole culture is based on cheap consumerism and tied together by a fat and expensive welfare state (which is basically bribing all those different non-European ethnicities in western Europe).

    The quote I used at the beginning of this post leads me to question the real motives of the blog author “JayMan”. I gathered from reading that he is of mixed race, but lacks the objectivity a mixed race thinker like Theodore Beale brings to the table, because Beale understands that Europe is defined by distinct peoples, and that the current process of immigration and assimilation is a threat to the survival of Europe. I question the objecitivty precisley because the blog author also deals with Europe here, and, as written, Europe has no reason whatsoever to allow immigration. There has been Third World immigration to Germany only for the past 5 decades, it’s nothing that can’t be reversed, and polls show that the majority of Germans have been opposed to immigration during the 60′s up to the present day. It’s solely the wish of corrupt elites and economists who support this process of destruction. Every ethnic Italian has more right to Italy than anyone else on this planet; this is true for every country.

    I get the feeling that the author “JayMan” might indeed be sold on consumerism, and high culture is not really part of his life. That’s fine, but then he must not use his influence to spread destructive ideas. He might not feel connected to a specific European culture, whereas I feel indebted to my Greco-Roman and Christian roots as well as to the vast canon of unique and high quality art, philosophy, classical music, literature and science that has been produced by Europeans; as a German, I feel especially connected to German culture, of course, and I have immersed myself in its culture for decades; few immigrants appreciate it. Again, consumerism. No matter if group selection is true or not, mass immigration and genetic assimilation would lead to the downfall of Europe and my culture. Again, if you support this, I question your motives. I question them especially since I’ve read posts by “JayMan” that are critical of mass immigration, and he is aware of the fate of the Portugese, as well as the Greeks and the southern Europeans, especially the Spanish. Up until several deaceds ago, central and northern Europe was spared non-European immigration, and due to this remaind wealthy and produced culture of high quality. The only immigrants that can be said to have had positive effects were the Ashkenazi Jews — I will ignore the Culture of Critique for this post –, but you have to understand that they were only about .7% of the German population. And they were of high intelligence. That’s the opposite of the Third World population western Europe is suffering from now.

    What I’m getting at is that the author of this blog post wants to paint being in favor of one’s own culture, which includes one’s own people, as right-wing extremists, as bigoted and as being on the wrong side of history. Europeans don’t need to justify themselves if they vote for politicans who would limit or even completely disallow non-European immigration. In fact, the intergeneration contract forbids replacing your people, or initiating a process that would alter the demographics of your country severly. Even if we wanted to, we wouldn’t be allowed to destroy the unique peoples and cultures of Europe. Mass immigration is not an act of nature, it can be stopped and reversed. And I hope Europeans start to wake up to reverse the damage that has been done — but it might be too late already.

    The 16 points of the Alt Right that Vox Day wrote make this very clear, especially the last point. [1] We of the Alt Right support nationalists of every nation; but the Alt Right is against imperialism of any kind; it supports all nations becoming autonomous.

    I apologize for the length, but I want to provide those who visit this blog post with a saner perspective, and I want to make clear that defending your nation and opposing immigration of any kind is not a crime.

    [0]: http://sezession.de/37160/wir-selbst-anthropologisch.html
    [1]: https://voxday.blogspot.fr/2016/08/what-alt-right-is.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @JayMan

    I want to provide those who visit this blog post with a saner perspective
     
    Before you can do any of that, you need to actually understand what I wrote. It doesn't seem like you do.

    This entry is all about one thing, and one thing only: the existence of ethnic nepotism. That is, whether or not kin altruism led individuals to favor members of their own ethnic group over others. The answer of course is no. This is impossible, for the reasons stated within. All the rest of your talk about group characteristics and population replacement by immigration is completely tangential to this.


    “The fitness impact to a White man’s genes if his daughter marries a Black man is the same as if she married an unrelated White man (again, fitness from gene function notwithstanding).”

    This is reductionist
     

    Yes. This is a science blog. Reductionism is one of the key goals of science.

    and does not take into account that a national character exists.
     
    Nothing to do with it. See above. Read the statement again.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • […] for kin altruism and hence kin selection (see a table and short discussion in my earlier entry “Ethnic Genetic Interests” Do Not Exist (Neither Does Group Selection). Now while kin selection was involved, it couldn’t have been a dominant force, because kin […]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • One feature of these individuals is a visceral opposition to “race mixing” (ignoring the fact that such gave us the modern races we see today). Well to those guys, I say I’ve been busy spreading my Black (and other) genes into the White gene pool here in Maine

    Uh, no. Your children are not part of the white gene pool. To be part of the white gene pool, you can’t have recent non-white ancestry.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ACThinker
    Jayman,

    Altruism towards in group as a basis for racism or reasons why we'd be genetically predisposed to mate in group? eh.. maybe a bit, but not as likely as other real physical traits.

    There is a basis for preferring those of a closer but not close genetic group. Consider that there are broad areas with their - until recent times - vast separation between them. There are over the 10K years* of separation between the European stock, the Asian stock, the Native American Stock, etc. Each of these areas has it's own fun problems of disease, pests, etc. Each of these has some amount of genetic fitness passed on to each generation for that local.

    Consider something as simple as a nose. There is typically a small nose in northern Europe, a large nose for the European of the Med, and then a much larger broader nose in the African population. Why? well one suggestion has to do with how the nose regulates the air we breath making it match what the lungs tolerate better. It needs to create the right humidity and warmth.

    We could look and melatonin in the skin, hair color and shape, etc. Each of these leads to a fitness for a given area.

    Now let me put in what is the real signalers of these - the pheromones that we as humans put off. These are un noticed by our conscious mind, but our mating response picks up on them and helps to fill and filter out who we should be with. Women are especially sensitive to this evidently, and it would be disastrous for a woman in prehistory to badly mate having children who were ill suited to their climate zone.

    Fast forward to today, some of that is still going on. This is not to say that the pheromones are destiny on mate choice, it is to say that they play a roll.

    Does this mean mixed children are worse off? Not necessarily because the threats of early death from genetic unfitness have been for now reduced, come the SHTF crash of the future, where we as a species have lost the capacity to live as we do today? well a reversion to Roman level food production will makes those genetically fit for the local hostile environment more able to survive

    * ok probably longer but 10k is an ok wag for this


    PS all this talk of human inbreeding. Any animal studies done on primates on this?

    Now let me put in what is the real signalers of these – the pheromones that we as humans put off. These are un noticed by our conscious mind, but our mating response picks up on them and helps to fill and filter out who we should be with.

    I don’t think there is any good evidence that pheromones do anything for humans.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Jayman,

    Altruism towards in group as a basis for racism or reasons why we’d be genetically predisposed to mate in group? eh.. maybe a bit, but not as likely as other real physical traits.

    There is a basis for preferring those of a closer but not close genetic group. Consider that there are broad areas with their – until recent times – vast separation between them. There are over the 10K years* of separation between the European stock, the Asian stock, the Native American Stock, etc. Each of these areas has it’s own fun problems of disease, pests, etc. Each of these has some amount of genetic fitness passed on to each generation for that local.

    Consider something as simple as a nose. There is typically a small nose in northern Europe, a large nose for the European of the Med, and then a much larger broader nose in the African population. Why? well one suggestion has to do with how the nose regulates the air we breath making it match what the lungs tolerate better. It needs to create the right humidity and warmth.

    We could look and melatonin in the skin, hair color and shape, etc. Each of these leads to a fitness for a given area.

    Now let me put in what is the real signalers of these – the pheromones that we as humans put off. These are un noticed by our conscious mind, but our mating response picks up on them and helps to fill and filter out who we should be with. Women are especially sensitive to this evidently, and it would be disastrous for a woman in prehistory to badly mate having children who were ill suited to their climate zone.

    Fast forward to today, some of that is still going on. This is not to say that the pheromones are destiny on mate choice, it is to say that they play a roll.

    Does this mean mixed children are worse off? Not necessarily because the threats of early death from genetic unfitness have been for now reduced, come the SHTF crash of the future, where we as a species have lost the capacity to live as we do today? well a reversion to Roman level food production will makes those genetically fit for the local hostile environment more able to survive

    * ok probably longer but 10k is an ok wag for this

    PS all this talk of human inbreeding. Any animal studies done on primates on this?

    Read More
    • Replies: @JayMan

    Now let me put in what is the real signalers of these – the pheromones that we as humans put off. These are un noticed by our conscious mind, but our mating response picks up on them and helps to fill and filter out who we should be with.
     
    I don't think there is any good evidence that pheromones do anything for humans.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • what happened to misdreavus?

    he was the only non-retard in the whole of the HBD-sphere.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • More than two decades after the Establishmentsuppressed Pat Buchanan and his “peasants with pitchforks,” the grassroots are again in revolt against the noodle-armed effetes of the Beltway Right. But this time, the uprising is directed not just against the political candidates of the Beltway Right, but against its intellectual mouthpieces: Conservatism Inc. is being rocked...
  • @Reg Cæsar

    …but somehow the Beltway Right is always there to tell conservatives to slash the few overwhelmingly popular government programs that actually benefit them.
     
    But if you offer to raise Medicare payments by 50%, the other side will offer to raise them by 75% and call your raise a cut. And those hoary old white folks will still vote to dig their grandchildren's graves.

    I see no way out of this except telling them point blank they have to choose between Medicare and their children's country. Their children will be the ones taxed to pay for the former in any event; nonwhites simply do not pay taxes, so there really is no interracial transfer.

    “nonwhites simply do not pay taxes”

    Lines like this get people put on my ignore list. I like nuanced thinking and you clearly are not prone to it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @KA
    Thanks.

    Isnt it really astonishing that the very people who messed things up are still advising governments,running think-tanks,or have become TV hosts .They are invited with respect and adulation to serve e as expert and wise .They run free .

    There is something about them that tells us that they like trained religious leaders follow certain cook book written or endorsed or collected from multiple similarly driven sources decades ago. There the connection between this- "The only prospect that hold hope for us is the carving of of Syria... It is out task to prepare for that prospect .All else is purposeless waste of time"-Zionist leader Jabotinsky and the rest Ben Guiron , Yoded Yinon ,PNAC,and post invasion plan.

    These rascals also operate on the principle that given the size and busy schedule of the empire ,the Zionist can simply create chaos to their advantage and expect the empire to clean after them .
    Even some psychopath like Cheney admitted and indicated that US had to step up and clean the mess after Israel had attacked Iran.

    Well it has happened a few time .Now the empire is tired and worn out .
    Its moral and strength are sagging like the skin is under the chin of Kissinger

    The “empire” you’ve mentioned includes Israel.

    The US is united with Israel in a common cause, to transform the world into a Nazi-white-supremacist free zone.

    If the Jewish people can fool the US into fighting Nazi in WW2, they can certainly expect the US to fight Nazi-white supremacist all over the world.

    Toward that end and as would be expected, Jewish people have concocted a profile of a Nazi-white supremacist….

    white-male-gentile-straight-healthy-Christian-militia-gringo-occidental-paleface

    The Jewish scheme here is to demonize people that fit this Jewish concocted profile of a Nazi, and artificially elevate people that don’t fit the Nazi profile.

    Using biased immigration policies, the Jewish scheme can insure that people not fitting the Nazi profile are always a super-majority of voters.

    Keeping a super-majority of voters that are anti-Nazi should adequately explain the Jewish fascination with national democracies in the US and Israel and the world.

    Jewish shysters and government agencies have used various euphemisms to refer to this anti-Nazi scheme in public, including the words diversity, pluralism, and multiculturalism.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Thanks.

    Isnt it really astonishing that the very people who messed things up are still advising governments,running think-tanks,or have become TV hosts .They are invited with respect and adulation to serve e as expert and wise .They run free .

    There is something about them that tells us that they like trained religious leaders follow certain cook book written or endorsed or collected from multiple similarly driven sources decades ago. There the connection between this- “The only prospect that hold hope for us is the carving of of Syria… It is out task to prepare for that prospect .All else is purposeless waste of time”-Zionist leader Jabotinsky and the rest Ben Guiron , Yoded Yinon ,PNAC,and post invasion plan.

    These rascals also operate on the principle that given the size and busy schedule of the empire ,the Zionist can simply create chaos to their advantage and expect the empire to clean after them .
    Even some psychopath like Cheney admitted and indicated that US had to step up and clean the mess after Israel had attacked Iran.

    Well it has happened a few time .Now the empire is tired and worn out .
    Its moral and strength are sagging like the skin is under the chin of Kissinger

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Franklin
    The "empire" you've mentioned includes Israel.

    The US is united with Israel in a common cause, to transform the world into a Nazi-white-supremacist free zone.

    If the Jewish people can fool the US into fighting Nazi in WW2, they can certainly expect the US to fight Nazi-white supremacist all over the world.

    Toward that end and as would be expected, Jewish people have concocted a profile of a Nazi-white supremacist....


    white-male-gentile-straight-healthy-Christian-militia-gringo-occidental-paleface


    The Jewish scheme here is to demonize people that fit this Jewish concocted profile of a Nazi, and artificially elevate people that don't fit the Nazi profile.

    Using biased immigration policies, the Jewish scheme can insure that people not fitting the Nazi profile are always a super-majority of voters.

    Keeping a super-majority of voters that are anti-Nazi should adequately explain the Jewish fascination with national democracies in the US and Israel and the world.

    Jewish shysters and government agencies have used various euphemisms to refer to this anti-Nazi scheme in public, including the words diversity, pluralism, and multiculturalism.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @KA
    Jay Garner 's detailed plan of ensuring smooth transition and preservation of Iraqi Army was approved as was heeded his warning of possible chaos . But within weeks of invasion Paul Brenner a protege ' of Henry Kissinger replaced Jay and countermanded Garner's plans including deBathification.

    Brenner's primary contact was Douglas Feith in Pentagon
    http:// www.takimag.com Patrick Foy. May 04 ,2007
    Sunday Telegraph ( UK) Oct 15,2006
    State of Denial by Bob Woodward .

    Another ignored fact is that old murderer ant Iraqi anti Irnian Kissinger was the frequent guest to Cheney office . ( page 406 in State of Denial)
    He was the person who said years ago that he wanted both to bled to death and he was sorry because both can't lose
    So what Brenner did was what was desired by Yoded Yinon,by Feith and above all by Kissinger.

    Kissinger is one of the figures against Iran negotiation( he might have changed his mind after the fact ) . He was instigating and gitating for aggressive posture against Iran
    ( Shmuel Rosner in HAARETZ .03/11/2006

    As I recall, the original plan was to preserve the Iraqi army. The plans of the Pentagon for a light footprint and quick withdrawal was based on the premise that the Iraqi army would remain intact and provide stability. Bremer changed that w/o notifying the Pentagon, or so we are told. Based on what you have laid out, I guess we have to conclude that it was the military which was kept in the dark. Kissinger met with Cheney, so we have to assume that Rumsfeld was in on the deal; Bremer reported to Feith. So one has to conclude that Bremer was sent to Iraq by certain elements in order to disband the Iraqi army. The dunce in the Oval Office, in the meantime, didn’t have a clue and was being led around by the nose by his hand-picked VP. Bremer, btw, in case your weren’t aware of the fact, had headed Kissinger Associates.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @tbraton
    Markin, I came across this passage in a site I came across, which sheds some light on Reagan and the neocons (notice the reference to "an extraordinarily small number of people"):

    "In checking out the Israeli flight, Veliotes also came to believe that the arrangement between Ronald Reagan’s camp and Israel regarding Iran and weapons dated back to before the 1980 election.

    “It seems to have started in earnest in the period probably prior to the election of 1980, as the Israelis had identified who would become the new players in the national security area in the Reagan administration,” Veliotes said. “And I understand some contacts were made at that time.”

    Q: “Between?”

    Veliotes: “Between Israelis and these new players.”

    In subsequent interviews, Veliotes said he was referring to “new players” who came into government with President Reagan, now known as the neoconservatives, including Robert McFarlane, counselor to Secretary of State Alexander Haig, and Paul Wolfowitz, the State Department’s director of policy planning. According to the newly released documents, McFarlane and Wolfowitz were collaborating with Israel through a clandestine channel.

    One memo from Wolfowitz to McFarlane – regarding the Israeli channel on Iran – noted that “for this dialogue to be fruitful it must remain restricted to an extraordinarily small number of people.”
    https://consortiumnews.com/2013/02/15/how-neocons-messed-up-the-mideast/

    P.S.--Also note this: "according to a memo from L. Paul Bremer III, who was then the State Department’s executive secretary and considered one of the neocons." That might explain his much later insane decision to disband the Iraqi army because it was considered dominated by Baathists. At least that is one possible explanation for his utter stupidity in Iraq. But, as Hanlon's Razor informs us, "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." As I recall, however, he was much criticized at the time for taking this action without informing anybody back in D.C. That would argue against stupidity.

    Jay Garner ‘s detailed plan of ensuring smooth transition and preservation of Iraqi Army was approved as was heeded his warning of possible chaos . But within weeks of invasion Paul Brenner a protege ‘ of Henry Kissinger replaced Jay and countermanded Garner’s plans including deBathification.

    Brenner’s primary contact was Douglas Feith in Pentagon
    http:// http://www.takimag.com Patrick Foy. May 04 ,2007
    Sunday Telegraph ( UK) Oct 15,2006
    State of Denial by Bob Woodward .

    Another ignored fact is that old murderer ant Iraqi anti Irnian Kissinger was the frequent guest to Cheney office . ( page 406 in State of Denial)
    He was the person who said years ago that he wanted both to bled to death and he was sorry because both can’t lose
    So what Brenner did was what was desired by Yoded Yinon,by Feith and above all by Kissinger.

    Kissinger is one of the figures against Iran negotiation( he might have changed his mind after the fact ) . He was instigating and gitating for aggressive posture against Iran
    ( Shmuel Rosner in HAARETZ .03/11/2006

    Read More
    • Replies: @tbraton
    As I recall, the original plan was to preserve the Iraqi army. The plans of the Pentagon for a light footprint and quick withdrawal was based on the premise that the Iraqi army would remain intact and provide stability. Bremer changed that w/o notifying the Pentagon, or so we are told. Based on what you have laid out, I guess we have to conclude that it was the military which was kept in the dark. Kissinger met with Cheney, so we have to assume that Rumsfeld was in on the deal; Bremer reported to Feith. So one has to conclude that Bremer was sent to Iraq by certain elements in order to disband the Iraqi army. The dunce in the Oval Office, in the meantime, didn't have a clue and was being led around by the nose by his hand-picked VP. Bremer, btw, in case your weren't aware of the fact, had headed Kissinger Associates.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • This is a good analysis of Trump-era politics, but I was hoping Goldberg would be called the ignorant slut that he is.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @woodNfish
    "...when the goal of a regime is corporate PROFIT, that regime is NOT marxist or socialist."

    Really? How do you explain the capitalism of communist china? I'll tell you what it is here in amerika - fascism. Just another form of socialism with profit.

    Marxism is just a variation of fascism.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Bill
    Oh, come on. Capital was enthusiastic about the Great Wave of immigration from Europe to the US. When WWI ended that, Capital promptly substituted the Great Migration of blacks to the formerly lily white North. Capital imported coolies to work on its railroads. Capital imports coolies, wogs, and wetbacks now.

    Capital is happy to depress wages by importing poor whites. Capital is happy to depress wages by importing poor blacks. Capital is happy to depress wages by importing poor Chinese. Capital is happy to depress wages by importing poor Mestizos. Capital is happy to depress wages by importing poor Indians. If ever cultural marxism ceases to be useful to Capital, cultural marxism will go by the wayside. It's just a PR strategy.

    The libertardians are right about Capital: it is completely and entirely amoral, mechanistic, and inhuman. It's just that they think these are good things. Just ask Bryan Caplan.

    Yes, I agree “Capital” is happy with cheap labor. But they don’t fundamentally drive long term immigration policy.

    Read More
    • Disagree: Leftist conservative
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @tbraton
    "I read that it was the Reagan people who came to the neocons via Buckley not the other way around. "

    You may be right, but I recall reading somewhere that it was the neocons who approached Reagan. The only prominent neocon who identified with Reagan from the "start" was Jeane Kirkpatrick, and she got rewarded with an appointment as Ambassador to the U.N. I tried Googling, and I came up with nothing, one way or the other. And I honestly can't remember where I read it. Of course, I should point out that it's possible that you read an account offered up by one of the neocons, who obviously would want to make it clear that the neocons were being sought out by Reagan rather than that they were the ones begging for a place at the table.

    (I pulled out my copy of Theodore White's book on the 1980 election, and he has virtually nothing to say about the matter, which, at that time, was pretty much under the radar, even for someone closely following politics. This is what I found on Wikipedia under Kirkpatrick:
    "This piece [in Commentary] came to the attention of Ronald Reagan through his National Security Adviser Richard V. Allen.[4] Kirkpatrick then became a foreign policy adviser throughout Reagan's 1980 campaign and presidency and, after his election to the presidency, the United States Ambassador to the United Nations, a position she held for four years. The Economist writes that, prior to this point, "she had never spent time with a Republican before."[1] On the way to her first meeting with him, she told Allen, "Listen, Dick, I am an AFL-CIO Democrat and I am quite concerned that my meeting Ronald Reagan on any basis will be misunderstood."[7] She asked Reagan if he minded having a lifelong Democrat on his team; he replied that he himself had been a Democrat until the age of 51, and in any event he liked her way of thinking about American foreign policy.[5]" So I gather from this that any reaching out by Reagan was done on an individual basis. And I don't believe anyone has ever argued that Reagan was a master of detail, so I doubt that he ever gave serious thought to the implications. BTW in 1976, Kirkpatrick had served on the Democratic Party's platform committee. And, I should point out, that Reagan made a very serious run for the Republican nomination that year criticizing the Panama Canal treaty and taking very aggressive foreign policy positions and nearly pulled it off.)

    But, either way, it was Reagan's decision to give the neocons a seat at the table, and it was he who appointed several neocons to positions of power in his administration, which they used to vastly increase their power. Granted, Reagan virtually ignored all their advice, which made the neocons generally unhappy, but he allowed the camel to get its nose under the tent. I am thinking specifically of Richard Perle who got a position at Defense, although, as I read in a piece by Max Boot pooh-poohing the very idea of a neocon conspiracy, Richard Perle has remained a Democrat throughout the whole experience, apparently in loyalty to his old mentor, the former socialist, Sen. Henry "Scoop" Jackson from Washington State.

    As far as loyalty goes, I was amused to read the other day on Breitbart that William Kristol apparently made it clear on his new perch at This Week with George Stephanopolis that, if Trump is the nominee of the Republicans, he will seriously consider endorsing a third party candidate. Now that's funny. After all the criticism Trump received for hinting that he might run as a third party candidate because of fears that that would succeed in throwing the election to Hillary Clinton, Bill Kristol is threatening to do the very same thing himself without much criticism as far as I can tell. That shows where his true loyalties lie. I guess he figures that Trump will not be as influenced by Kristol's whispers in his ear as those empty vessels Dan Quayle and Sarah Palin. I believe Kristol's former boss, Rupert Murdoch, also recently tossed out the idea of endorsing Michael Bloomberg if he were to run as a third party candidate.

    Markin, I came across this passage in a site I came across, which sheds some light on Reagan and the neocons (notice the reference to “an extraordinarily small number of people”):

    “In checking out the Israeli flight, Veliotes also came to believe that the arrangement between Ronald Reagan’s camp and Israel regarding Iran and weapons dated back to before the 1980 election.

    “It seems to have started in earnest in the period probably prior to the election of 1980, as the Israelis had identified who would become the new players in the national security area in the Reagan administration,” Veliotes said. “And I understand some contacts were made at that time.”

    Q: “Between?”

    Veliotes: “Between Israelis and these new players.”

    In subsequent interviews, Veliotes said he was referring to “new players” who came into government with President Reagan, now known as the neoconservatives, including Robert McFarlane, counselor to Secretary of State Alexander Haig, and Paul Wolfowitz, the State Department’s director of policy planning. According to the newly released documents, McFarlane and Wolfowitz were collaborating with Israel through a clandestine channel.

    One memo from Wolfowitz to McFarlane – regarding the Israeli channel on Iran – noted that “for this dialogue to be fruitful it must remain restricted to an extraordinarily small number of people.”

    https://consortiumnews.com/2013/02/15/how-neocons-messed-up-the-mideast/

    P.S.–Also note this: “according to a memo from L. Paul Bremer III, who was then the State Department’s executive secretary and considered one of the neocons.” That might explain his much later insane decision to disband the Iraqi army because it was considered dominated by Baathists. At least that is one possible explanation for his utter stupidity in Iraq. But, as Hanlon’s Razor informs us, “never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.” As I recall, however, he was much criticized at the time for taking this action without informing anybody back in D.C. That would argue against stupidity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @KA
    Jay Garner 's detailed plan of ensuring smooth transition and preservation of Iraqi Army was approved as was heeded his warning of possible chaos . But within weeks of invasion Paul Brenner a protege ' of Henry Kissinger replaced Jay and countermanded Garner's plans including deBathification.

    Brenner's primary contact was Douglas Feith in Pentagon
    http:// www.takimag.com Patrick Foy. May 04 ,2007
    Sunday Telegraph ( UK) Oct 15,2006
    State of Denial by Bob Woodward .

    Another ignored fact is that old murderer ant Iraqi anti Irnian Kissinger was the frequent guest to Cheney office . ( page 406 in State of Denial)
    He was the person who said years ago that he wanted both to bled to death and he was sorry because both can't lose
    So what Brenner did was what was desired by Yoded Yinon,by Feith and above all by Kissinger.

    Kissinger is one of the figures against Iran negotiation( he might have changed his mind after the fact ) . He was instigating and gitating for aggressive posture against Iran
    ( Shmuel Rosner in HAARETZ .03/11/2006

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Curle
    The excrable Jennifer Rubin got her start at the National Review. The same rag that defenestrated Derbyshire. Need more be said?

    Piss on National Review. It’s a haven for armchair commandos and Israel-Firsters.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @OilcanFloyd
    "The well-educated resist the indoctrination, they can join the dots and have the means – and desire – for argument."

    I agree that there is every attempt to dumb down the masses, but it seems that the well-educated are often the ones who are the most indoctrinated, or at least they spew the most garbage. Why not? They're the ones who are tapped to run things. The unwashed aren't the ones making and enforcing the rules. They're usually even ignored by the politicians who are supposed to represent them.

    When said “well-educated” he did not mean “possessing lots of degrees.” He meant something like “learned in the liberal arts.” That is understanding critical reasoning, logic, math, and the fact that these things are the language in which the universe is written. Modern universities do not teach this.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @MarkinLA
    I read that it was the Reagan people who came to the neocons via Buckley not the other way around. The issue was that Reagan lacked foreign policy "gravitas" being only a governor and not really part of the Washington beltway crowd.

    “I read that it was the Reagan people who came to the neocons via Buckley not the other way around. ”

    You may be right, but I recall reading somewhere that it was the neocons who approached Reagan. The only prominent neocon who identified with Reagan from the “start” was Jeane Kirkpatrick, and she got rewarded with an appointment as Ambassador to the U.N. I tried Googling, and I came up with nothing, one way or the other. And I honestly can’t remember where I read it. Of course, I should point out that it’s possible that you read an account offered up by one of the neocons, who obviously would want to make it clear that the neocons were being sought out by Reagan rather than that they were the ones begging for a place at the table.

    (I pulled out my copy of Theodore White’s book on the 1980 election, and he has virtually nothing to say about the matter, which, at that time, was pretty much under the radar, even for someone closely following politics. This is what I found on Wikipedia under Kirkpatrick:
    “This piece [in Commentary] came to the attention of Ronald Reagan through his National Security Adviser Richard V. Allen.[4] Kirkpatrick then became a foreign policy adviser throughout Reagan’s 1980 campaign and presidency and, after his election to the presidency, the United States Ambassador to the United Nations, a position she held for four years. The Economist writes that, prior to this point, “she had never spent time with a Republican before.”[1] On the way to her first meeting with him, she told Allen, “Listen, Dick, I am an AFL-CIO Democrat and I am quite concerned that my meeting Ronald Reagan on any basis will be misunderstood.”[7] She asked Reagan if he minded having a lifelong Democrat on his team; he replied that he himself had been a Democrat until the age of 51, and in any event he liked her way of thinking about American foreign policy.[5]” So I gather from this that any reaching out by Reagan was done on an individual basis. And I don’t believe anyone has ever argued that Reagan was a master of detail, so I doubt that he ever gave serious thought to the implications. BTW in 1976, Kirkpatrick had served on the Democratic Party’s platform committee. And, I should point out, that Reagan made a very serious run for the Republican nomination that year criticizing the Panama Canal treaty and taking very aggressive foreign policy positions and nearly pulled it off.)

    But, either way, it was Reagan’s decision to give the neocons a seat at the table, and it was he who appointed several neocons to positions of power in his administration, which they used to vastly increase their power. Granted, Reagan virtually ignored all their advice, which made the neocons generally unhappy, but he allowed the camel to get its nose under the tent. I am thinking specifically of Richard Perle who got a position at Defense, although, as I read in a piece by Max Boot pooh-poohing the very idea of a neocon conspiracy, Richard Perle has remained a Democrat throughout the whole experience, apparently in loyalty to his old mentor, the former socialist, Sen. Henry “Scoop” Jackson from Washington State.

    As far as loyalty goes, I was amused to read the other day on Breitbart that William Kristol apparently made it clear on his new perch at This Week with George Stephanopolis that, if Trump is the nominee of the Republicans, he will seriously consider endorsing a third party candidate. Now that’s funny. After all the criticism Trump received for hinting that he might run as a third party candidate because of fears that that would succeed in throwing the election to Hillary Clinton, Bill Kristol is threatening to do the very same thing himself without much criticism as far as I can tell. That shows where his true loyalties lie. I guess he figures that Trump will not be as influenced by Kristol’s whispers in his ear as those empty vessels Dan Quayle and Sarah Palin. I believe Kristol’s former boss, Rupert Murdoch, also recently tossed out the idea of endorsing Michael Bloomberg if he were to run as a third party candidate.

    Read More
    • Replies: @tbraton
    Markin, I came across this passage in a site I came across, which sheds some light on Reagan and the neocons (notice the reference to "an extraordinarily small number of people"):

    "In checking out the Israeli flight, Veliotes also came to believe that the arrangement between Ronald Reagan’s camp and Israel regarding Iran and weapons dated back to before the 1980 election.

    “It seems to have started in earnest in the period probably prior to the election of 1980, as the Israelis had identified who would become the new players in the national security area in the Reagan administration,” Veliotes said. “And I understand some contacts were made at that time.”

    Q: “Between?”

    Veliotes: “Between Israelis and these new players.”

    In subsequent interviews, Veliotes said he was referring to “new players” who came into government with President Reagan, now known as the neoconservatives, including Robert McFarlane, counselor to Secretary of State Alexander Haig, and Paul Wolfowitz, the State Department’s director of policy planning. According to the newly released documents, McFarlane and Wolfowitz were collaborating with Israel through a clandestine channel.

    One memo from Wolfowitz to McFarlane – regarding the Israeli channel on Iran – noted that “for this dialogue to be fruitful it must remain restricted to an extraordinarily small number of people.”
    https://consortiumnews.com/2013/02/15/how-neocons-messed-up-the-mideast/

    P.S.--Also note this: "according to a memo from L. Paul Bremer III, who was then the State Department’s executive secretary and considered one of the neocons." That might explain his much later insane decision to disband the Iraqi army because it was considered dominated by Baathists. At least that is one possible explanation for his utter stupidity in Iraq. But, as Hanlon's Razor informs us, "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." As I recall, however, he was much criticized at the time for taking this action without informing anybody back in D.C. That would argue against stupidity.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Leftist conservative [AKA "radical_centrist"] says: • Website
    @OilcanFloyd
    "The well-educated resist the indoctrination, they can join the dots and have the means – and desire – for argument."

    I agree that there is every attempt to dumb down the masses, but it seems that the well-educated are often the ones who are the most indoctrinated, or at least they spew the most garbage. Why not? They're the ones who are tapped to run things. The unwashed aren't the ones making and enforcing the rules. They're usually even ignored by the politicians who are supposed to represent them.

    I agree that there is every attempt to dumb down the masses, but it seems that the well-educated are often the ones who are the most indoctrinated, or at least they spew the most garbage. Why not? They’re the ones who are tapped to run things. The unwashed aren’t the ones making and enforcing the rules. They’re usually even ignored by the politicians who are supposed to represent them.

    Exactly, and this is why the GOP never did anything about school vouchers when they got control of all three branches of the federal govt in the early 2000′s. The GOP ran primarily on school vouchers, but once in power, did absolutely nothing about it. Capital knows that education is propaganda. The pervasiveness of higher education in america as compared to europe is one big reason why the USA has so much more immigration. Yes, we are far more diverse than almost all of europe. And americans have much more formal education. Formal education has a large component of multiculturalist propaganda.

    The plutocrats and corporations started reshaping the culture at the educational curriculum level. And now that propaganda feed that took place over decades has had its effects. White race guilt is endemic in the white population.

    Once you get your propaganda seed into the young mind, you have most of them for life, or at least for several decades. A child raised up in a certain way will not depart therefrom.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Bill

    Buckleyite conservatism was of its time. It had a purpose, resonance, and maybe a chance in the America it was born into , and which still existed as a sort of shadow America in Reagan’s era.

    But it was coming undone from the end of the cold war. Anticommunism was no longer necessary,
     
    You don't seem to be too clear on the history. The Buckleyite purges started well before the end of the Cold War. Even the neutered John Birch Society was too radical for Bill Buckley. Things have gotten even worse since the end of the Cold War, but it's just an intensification of an already-present tendency.

    The ‘Progressive’ New Deal consensus America of 1933-roughly 1965, based on big government, big business, big labor in a cosy corporatist structure, largely administered by progressive white [WASP-German for the most part] elites and with some elements of social conservatism [though only fitfully religious] collapsed.
     
    Yeah, it just kinda happened, you know? Sorta spontaneous-like. Causelessly. It just suddenly seemed, to everyone all at once via the Jungian collective subconscious, that the idyllic post-War America needed to be ruthlessly burned to the ground and its children turned out. And then fires, they just popped up everywhere. And key parties, let's not forget the key parties. Just happened one day. For no reason.

    What would Strunk and White say? Who cares, thought, right? Not only were they WASPs, they weren't even linguists.

    I know he was purging the Birchers way back in the day. My point was that his kind of conservatism (i.e. the kind he created, so the one he shaped having purged whoever he wanted) was a product of that time and has nothing to say to this era. I happened to augment that by arguing that its irrelevance began with the end of the unifying function of anticommunism, causing its components to spiral off in their own directions, one of which was the sort of unfocused neocon/internationalism/liberalism “conservatism” we see in charge today.

    That strain could only have taken its present form after the end of the Cold War, because only then did the main goal of challenging the USSR end, leaving them room to contemplate their own world revolution [unchecked, so they thought], and because only then did liberalism/progressivism start to really come out in its neo-McGovernite form. Most of the social liberalism of today, for example, was unthinkable to the majority in the 1980s but it started to be propagated openly in the Clinton era. Mass-market TV got even more progressive quite quickly. That created a climate in which the neocons could essentially embrace a progressive, universalist narrative at home, and focus on projecting it abroad.

    I frankly don’t see the relevance of Buckley purging the JBS back then to the irrelevance/disintegration of his type of conservatism today. If he had not purged JBS, his type of conservatism would not have had anything to say to the majority right from the start, never mind becoming irrelevant 30 years later. His conservatism would have been stillborn and there would have been no vaguely conservative voice at all in the 1960s-80s. Look at how much the left accomplished in those years with weak opposition. Now imagine no opposition existed at all. The Birchers’ version of conservatism wasn’t going to provide it. If they had been capable of winning anything like that level of support, they would have done it with or without him.

    Now, I agree with your contention that the tendency of modern Conservatism Inc to purge its internal enemies is an extension of what Buckley did. But that was not my point. My point was that the movement he created by doing that had its time and after that time had nothing left of value to say to a changed era.

    Besides, all political movements end up defining themselves by including some and excluding others. If the excluded are up to it and have an audience willing to hear them, they will succeed anyway and overtake those who purged them. Buckley and his conservatives hardly created this cycle ex nihilo.

    On the collapse of New Deal America, I don’t know what all that is supposed to mean. I said it collapsed. I didn’t say it “just happened” or speculate on all the reasons involved, interests at play, or individuals at work. So I’m not sure there is any disagreement here. I would, at this point, observe that it is nevertheless so that political and social change on that scale does, on some level, just happen. History can be nudged along by people willing to say and do things and see where the chips fall. But even that happens at the margins. Too many moving parts have to work at their own pace and one has to take advantage of what is already happening rather than seek to wholly change course. Big History is not planned.

    It’s pretty hard for the secret council of twenty to engineer a huge transcontinental baby boom with consequent large bulge of youth seeking to define themselves, also engineer unprecedented prosperity so that they feel free to pursue a more open approach to doing that, and parents who want to indulge them, AND have already engineered an apocalyptic war whose excesses start to alter the moral compass of the entire society and offer a convenient ideological bludgeon to radicals. I know I find those planning sessions exhausting and ultimately futile. The last meeting just dragged on forever.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @sure thing
    The key word is 'educated'.

    As in the ability to reason through the development of the critical faculties, primarily through literacy, Capital's worst enemy. ( Which is why it flooded the universities with po-mo, which has led to homo 'marriage', or eugenics-by-stealth. Always an obsession of the plutocracy - check out the Rockefeller-Mengele funding connection.)

    First you make folk stupid. That way they internalize their own degradation and become pliant cattle. The well-educated resist the indoctrination, they can join the dots and have the means - and desire - for argument.

    Radcentrist is walking just fine.

    “The well-educated resist the indoctrination, they can join the dots and have the means – and desire – for argument.”

    I agree that there is every attempt to dumb down the masses, but it seems that the well-educated are often the ones who are the most indoctrinated, or at least they spew the most garbage. Why not? They’re the ones who are tapped to run things. The unwashed aren’t the ones making and enforcing the rules. They’re usually even ignored by the politicians who are supposed to represent them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Leftist conservative

    I agree that there is every attempt to dumb down the masses, but it seems that the well-educated are often the ones who are the most indoctrinated, or at least they spew the most garbage. Why not? They’re the ones who are tapped to run things. The unwashed aren’t the ones making and enforcing the rules. They’re usually even ignored by the politicians who are supposed to represent them.
     
    Exactly, and this is why the GOP never did anything about school vouchers when they got control of all three branches of the federal govt in the early 2000's. The GOP ran primarily on school vouchers, but once in power, did absolutely nothing about it. Capital knows that education is propaganda. The pervasiveness of higher education in america as compared to europe is one big reason why the USA has so much more immigration. Yes, we are far more diverse than almost all of europe. And americans have much more formal education. Formal education has a large component of multiculturalist propaganda.

    The plutocrats and corporations started reshaping the culture at the educational curriculum level. And now that propaganda feed that took place over decades has had its effects. White race guilt is endemic in the white population.

    Once you get your propaganda seed into the young mind, you have most of them for life, or at least for several decades. A child raised up in a certain way will not depart therefrom.
    , @Bill
    When @sure thing said "well-educated" he did not mean "possessing lots of degrees." He meant something like "learned in the liberal arts." That is understanding critical reasoning, logic, math, and the fact that these things are the language in which the universe is written. Modern universities do not teach this.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mark Green
    I watched Buckley's TV show 'Firing Line' for decades. He actually did some good work in the early part of his career. He was far better than mainstream news or PBS. Buckley did publish some outstanding articles by Joe Sobran and others. But once the cold war ended, the neocons totally took over Conservatism, inc. It happened under Reagan's watch.

    Buckley yielded to the neocons because he was dependent on Jewish money (e.g. Walter Annenberg and others) to keep his TV show and magazine (National Review) afloat. Every white identarian faces this problem once they go national and try to (1) raise money and (2) receive 'good press'. The hidden hand of world Jewry is everywhere.

    Cohesive and focused Jewish financial and editorial power makes it nearly impossible to be anti-Zionist ('anti-Semitic') without being blacklisted, defamed, rendered invisible, and having all political money dry up. Billionaire Trump realizes this. His recent 'pledge of loyalty' to the GOP means that he will never deviate from the mainstream US position concerning Washington's 'special relationship' with the Zionist cuckoo. Even a whiff of disloyalty towards Israel would spell political suicide.

    Indeed, if Trump expressed sympathy for the Palestinians or raised the issue of Israeli nukes, he'd get murdered by the press and disowned by the GOP. He fully understands this. Thus, Trump's 'moderate' Iran-hating and Israel-loving positions. This is the state of US politics. We are living under soft occupation.

    Cohesive and focused Jewish financial and editorial power makes it nearly impossible to be anti-Zionist (‘anti-Semitic’) without being blacklisted, defamed, rendered invisible, and having all political money dry up. Billionaire Trump realizes this. His recent ‘pledge of loyalty’ to the GOP means that he will never deviate from the mainstream US position concerning Washington’s ‘special relationship’ with the Zionist cuckoo. Even a whiff of disloyalty towards Israel would spell political suicide.

    You’re completely ignoring the cultural context that makes all this possible. Look who just became leader of the British Labour Party. They tried all the smears about ‘anti-semitism’ on him; public didn’t care.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @woodNfish

    Human Livestock. That is what Capital desires. Can educated whites be a good supply of human livestock, a supply of workers and consumers? A source of growth?

    No.
     
    Yeah, not buying that. You need to explain why you say, "No.", because you blew your whole premise right there.

    The key word is ‘educated’.

    As in the ability to reason through the development of the critical faculties, primarily through literacy, Capital’s worst enemy. ( Which is why it flooded the universities with po-mo, which has led to homo ‘marriage’, or eugenics-by-stealth. Always an obsession of the plutocracy – check out the Rockefeller-Mengele funding connection.)

    First you make folk stupid. That way they internalize their own degradation and become pliant cattle. The well-educated resist the indoctrination, they can join the dots and have the means – and desire – for argument.

    Radcentrist is walking just fine.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    "The well-educated resist the indoctrination, they can join the dots and have the means – and desire – for argument."

    I agree that there is every attempt to dumb down the masses, but it seems that the well-educated are often the ones who are the most indoctrinated, or at least they spew the most garbage. Why not? They're the ones who are tapped to run things. The unwashed aren't the ones making and enforcing the rules. They're usually even ignored by the politicians who are supposed to represent them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @WhatEvvs

    But if you offer to raise Medicare payments by 50%, the other side will offer to raise them by 75% and call your raise a cut. And those hoary old white folks will still vote to dig their grandchildren’s graves.
     
    No they WON'T. Geez, guys like you are retch inducing. Really. Guys like you are as bad as the cucks. Get a life, Caesar, talk to some older people. They care about their kids and their grandkids. Do you have any?

    Get a life, Caesar, talk to some older people. They care about their kids and their grandkids. Do you have any?

    Yeah, I do. They’re interrupting me now, and slowing down the replies. My kids are the age of my contemporaries’ grandkids, so I get both perspectives at once.

    I didn’t say all old people are like that. Hell, I’m the tireless nag on this forum damning everyone else for dumping people into pseudoscientific groupings called “generations” on the thin grounds that they were born about the same time.

    I was talking about benefit-first voters who, as Mr Kirkpatrick reminds us, make those benefits “overwhelmingly popular”. Popular enough for swing voters to trade away their grandchildren’s country to keep the checks coming in.

    I’m old enough to remember stumping for Goldwater on my neighbor’s lawn, even though my 21st birthday was well over a decade in the future.

    Forty million white people voted for their benefits above all else that November– and millions more would have done the same, had not the benefits party promised them “negro pandemonium” along with the rest. That’s one stark lesson for a kid in kneepants. I never forgot it.

    Now most of those voters are dead, and their great-grandchildren are already a minority of their own cohort. Thanks to their ancestors who “voted their pocketbooks”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @tbraton
    "The wrong question is being asked; the question is why the neocons are in total control of the republican party, a party that now shares the center with the democrats."

    I agree, and that is a question I asked a number of times between 2010 and 2014 on TAC. In late 2010, I posted the following message:

    "tbraton says:
    November 11, 2010 at 2:54 pm
    Let me add my compliments for a well-written article.

    The thing that has always puzzled me about the neocons is what they brought to the Reagan coalition. The neocons, who were largely Jewish, had already abandoned their spiritual home, the Democratic Party and had nowhere else to go. Since they represented a minority of the population (2%) that continued to vote overwhelmingly for Democratic candidates, they brought little to no electoral votes, in contrast to the Christian Conservatives, who brought quite a few states in the South and border regions. The neocons did not agree with the Reagan domestic policy, and many neocon leaders eventually criticized Reagan for his tepid foreign policy. The neocons have done great damage to the country and to the Republican Party. So count me as puzzled about what they have added."

    In 2011, I reposted the following paragraph from an October 28, 2010 blog on TAC by David Gordon:

    " The neocons of the second age did not quit the Democratic Party until, after prolonged struggle, they had failed to take it over. They then discovered in the rising popularity of Ronald Reagan a new strategy to advance their goals; but even when Reagan and his aides received them warmly, many found it distinctly against the grain to vote for a Republican. Once they had overcome this aversion, the neocons proved able markedly to expand their political power and influence. Nevertheless, some neocons found Reagan insufficiently militant. For Norman Podhoretz, a literary critic who imagined himself a foreign policy expert, Reagan became an appeaser reminiscent of Neville Chamberlain. “In 1984-85, however, Podhoretz finally lost hope in his champion; he … lamented the president’s desire to do whatever it took to present himself to Europeans and above all to American voters as a ‘man of peace,’ ready to negotiate with the Soviets.” http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/anatomy-of-neoconservatism/

    I read that it was the Reagan people who came to the neocons via Buckley not the other way around. The issue was that Reagan lacked foreign policy “gravitas” being only a governor and not really part of the Washington beltway crowd.

    Read More
    • Replies: @tbraton
    "I read that it was the Reagan people who came to the neocons via Buckley not the other way around. "

    You may be right, but I recall reading somewhere that it was the neocons who approached Reagan. The only prominent neocon who identified with Reagan from the "start" was Jeane Kirkpatrick, and she got rewarded with an appointment as Ambassador to the U.N. I tried Googling, and I came up with nothing, one way or the other. And I honestly can't remember where I read it. Of course, I should point out that it's possible that you read an account offered up by one of the neocons, who obviously would want to make it clear that the neocons were being sought out by Reagan rather than that they were the ones begging for a place at the table.

    (I pulled out my copy of Theodore White's book on the 1980 election, and he has virtually nothing to say about the matter, which, at that time, was pretty much under the radar, even for someone closely following politics. This is what I found on Wikipedia under Kirkpatrick:
    "This piece [in Commentary] came to the attention of Ronald Reagan through his National Security Adviser Richard V. Allen.[4] Kirkpatrick then became a foreign policy adviser throughout Reagan's 1980 campaign and presidency and, after his election to the presidency, the United States Ambassador to the United Nations, a position she held for four years. The Economist writes that, prior to this point, "she had never spent time with a Republican before."[1] On the way to her first meeting with him, she told Allen, "Listen, Dick, I am an AFL-CIO Democrat and I am quite concerned that my meeting Ronald Reagan on any basis will be misunderstood."[7] She asked Reagan if he minded having a lifelong Democrat on his team; he replied that he himself had been a Democrat until the age of 51, and in any event he liked her way of thinking about American foreign policy.[5]" So I gather from this that any reaching out by Reagan was done on an individual basis. And I don't believe anyone has ever argued that Reagan was a master of detail, so I doubt that he ever gave serious thought to the implications. BTW in 1976, Kirkpatrick had served on the Democratic Party's platform committee. And, I should point out, that Reagan made a very serious run for the Republican nomination that year criticizing the Panama Canal treaty and taking very aggressive foreign policy positions and nearly pulled it off.)

    But, either way, it was Reagan's decision to give the neocons a seat at the table, and it was he who appointed several neocons to positions of power in his administration, which they used to vastly increase their power. Granted, Reagan virtually ignored all their advice, which made the neocons generally unhappy, but he allowed the camel to get its nose under the tent. I am thinking specifically of Richard Perle who got a position at Defense, although, as I read in a piece by Max Boot pooh-poohing the very idea of a neocon conspiracy, Richard Perle has remained a Democrat throughout the whole experience, apparently in loyalty to his old mentor, the former socialist, Sen. Henry "Scoop" Jackson from Washington State.

    As far as loyalty goes, I was amused to read the other day on Breitbart that William Kristol apparently made it clear on his new perch at This Week with George Stephanopolis that, if Trump is the nominee of the Republicans, he will seriously consider endorsing a third party candidate. Now that's funny. After all the criticism Trump received for hinting that he might run as a third party candidate because of fears that that would succeed in throwing the election to Hillary Clinton, Bill Kristol is threatening to do the very same thing himself without much criticism as far as I can tell. That shows where his true loyalties lie. I guess he figures that Trump will not be as influenced by Kristol's whispers in his ear as those empty vessels Dan Quayle and Sarah Palin. I believe Kristol's former boss, Rupert Murdoch, also recently tossed out the idea of endorsing Michael Bloomberg if he were to run as a third party candidate.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Pure Capitalism” and ” (pure) Communism” are exactly the same, as predicted by the Smith Chart. Of course, both are entirely theoretical, neither having ever been achieved.

    Communism can be defined exactly as the Marxist-Leninists did; the state, post-Socialism, where the organs of the state wither away because New Soviet (or whoever) Man no longer needs them.

    To the true and correct Communist, there never was a Communist country. All “communist” countries were, in the terminology of Communists, “Socialist”, rather than communist. Socialism being this theoretical intermediate state between “bourgeois capitalism” and the future promised “Communism”.

    Under Socialism, as practiced in the Soviet Union and other Marxist states, everyone theoretically owned everything, but in practice no one owned anything. All property and transactions were controlled by the State. The nomenklatura lived like wealthy people in the capitalist world, and most everyone else lived in poverty. They could ride the subway for a kopek, and see world class ballet and classical music cheaply, but they dressed shabbily, smelled bad, and although they ate enough, the food was crappy and unappetizing.

    Pure capitalism, like true Communism, was a figment of the imagination of a theoretical intellectual, in this case, a Russian Jewess named Alyssa Rosenbaum. In her postulated “Galt’s Gulch”, individuals would interact on a constantly competitive and pure state of enterprise, with no state apparatus to guide, uplift, suppress, or otherwise bother them. That was about as likely in reality as the Socialist State was to wither away on its own. What really happened in “capitalist” countries was that we had not capitalism, but State Corporatism.

    State corporatism was better for the average American than Socialism was for the average Russian (or Ukrainian or whatever), but it was probably not mostly because the people at the top of American society were all that much more benevolent than their Soviet counterparts. We should be asking a lot of questions why this was so.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Arius
    Buckley failed because it was he that exiled the old conservatives then brought in James Burnham and others from the Left. Result: the neocons. This is all spelled out in gory detail by others. The wrong question is being asked; the question is why the neocons are in total control of the republican party, a party that now shares the center with the democrats.

    “The wrong question is being asked; the question is why the neocons are in total control of the republican party, a party that now shares the center with the democrats.”

    I agree, and that is a question I asked a number of times between 2010 and 2014 on TAC. In late 2010, I posted the following message:

    “tbraton says:
    November 11, 2010 at 2:54 pm
    Let me add my compliments for a well-written article.

    The thing that has always puzzled me about the neocons is what they brought to the Reagan coalition. The neocons, who were largely Jewish, had already abandoned their spiritual home, the Democratic Party and had nowhere else to go. Since they represented a minority of the population (2%) that continued to vote overwhelmingly for Democratic candidates, they brought little to no electoral votes, in contrast to the Christian Conservatives, who brought quite a few states in the South and border regions. The neocons did not agree with the Reagan domestic policy, and many neocon leaders eventually criticized Reagan for his tepid foreign policy. The neocons have done great damage to the country and to the Republican Party. So count me as puzzled about what they have added.”

    In 2011, I reposted the following paragraph from an October 28, 2010 blog on TAC by David Gordon:

    ” The neocons of the second age did not quit the Democratic Party until, after prolonged struggle, they had failed to take it over. They then discovered in the rising popularity of Ronald Reagan a new strategy to advance their goals; but even when Reagan and his aides received them warmly, many found it distinctly against the grain to vote for a Republican. Once they had overcome this aversion, the neocons proved able markedly to expand their political power and influence. Nevertheless, some neocons found Reagan insufficiently militant. For Norman Podhoretz, a literary critic who imagined himself a foreign policy expert, Reagan became an appeaser reminiscent of Neville Chamberlain. “In 1984-85, however, Podhoretz finally lost hope in his champion; he … lamented the president’s desire to do whatever it took to present himself to Europeans and above all to American voters as a ‘man of peace,’ ready to negotiate with the Soviets.” http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/anatomy-of-neoconservatism/

    Read More
    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    I read that it was the Reagan people who came to the neocons via Buckley not the other way around. The issue was that Reagan lacked foreign policy "gravitas" being only a governor and not really part of the Washington beltway crowd.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Bill Jones
    You want world peace, or relative peace as opposed to warlike liberal cant like the Brotherhood of Man?

    How'd that work in Europe?

    And if you want to know just how deeply fucked up the US is, there's this:
    http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2015/09/one-third-of-americans-would-be-fine-with-the-military-taking-over

    This is Wiemar on steroids

    Bill, your referenced article: ” Online survey shows 29% would support possible takeover while 41% said they could not imagine supporting such an event.”

    I don’t want to nitpick but an online poll is about as reliable as Chinese pollsters on economics.

    Otoh, still not sure what point you are making. Asking the military to takeover from Jew-tool fools that run us is an interesting idea.

    Joe

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Bill Jones
    You want world peace, or relative peace as opposed to warlike liberal cant like the Brotherhood of Man?

    How'd that work in Europe?

    And if you want to know just how deeply fucked up the US is, there's this:
    http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2015/09/one-third-of-americans-would-be-fine-with-the-military-taking-over

    This is Wiemar on steroids

    “And if you want to know just how deeply fucked up the US is, there’s this:

    http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2015/09/one-third-of-americans-would-be-fine-with-the-military-taking-over

    This is Wiemar on steroids”

    Yeah, except that wasn’t a bona fide public opinion survey, but just one of those online voting polls, which tell us almost nothing about what the public actually thinks. Kinda like when they’d ask “Who are you going to vote for in the 2012 Republican Presidential primary?,” and Ron Paul would get 93 percent, and Mitt Romney would 1.6 percent. Yet in the actual elections, a lot more people voted for Mitt Romney (unfortunately).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Meanwhile, back in the YUK the corporate media whores welcome Corbyn’s victory as new leader of the Labour Party in typical unbiased style.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/12/us-britain-politics-labour-corbyn-insigh-idUSKCN0RC0EZ20150912

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Curle
    The excrable Jennifer Rubin got her start at the National Review. The same rag that defenestrated Derbyshire. Need more be said?

    And Mark Steyn too, no?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Next to Buckley – Scoop Jackson (Senator from Washington state ) is the one most responsible for the Talmudic Jew takeover of America.

    He started taking Jew reelection money for supporting Israel in the 60’s. He started the takeover of the US congress by Jews.

    For personal gain he sold out his Christian nation and turned it over to the Christ hating Talmudic Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Dutch Boy
    Burnham was not a Neo-Con. They came later.

    Honestly what is he talking about. Sam Francis admired James Burnahm. And more to the point James Burnham didn’t replace anyone he was at NR from the start.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Great Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    Kirkpatrick and the rest of vdare.com….always trying to bring back the corpse of Ronnie Reagan. This of course makes vdare.com the problem.

    Let the Republican Party croak…including the Ronnie Reagan version.

    The only viable game in town for The Historic Native Born White American Working Class Majority is highly racialized…highly zenophobic racial…economically progressive Racial Patriotism-Racial Nationalism. The Republican Party..whatever version…is a rotting stinking corpse that must be buried in lead and buried in a Utah salt mine.

    The vdare.com immigration moratorium is another form of very rapid race-replacement immigration policy…its playing footsie with an enemy that has genocidal intent towards The Native Born White American Working Class.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Sam Shama
    Rurik,
    You are wrong yet again about the Fed of course.

    Although you've surely outdone yourself this time, as the picture of


    best interest = the systematic genocidal replacement of white people with a blended population of slaves.
     
    prompted me to hearken back to the song sung to Moses by his Egyptian nanny, with the 'blended' (read ridiculously made-up extras of the 1950s set) slaves keeping watch!

    Naw Sam, I’m right about the Fed.

    “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” -Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence

    and that was at the beginning of the 20th century. Look how far they’ve come at destroying this country and any hope for its future or its people. We are on the brink, and Wall Street is like a bloated tick about to pop- it’s so glutted with the wealth of looted Main Street. And there’s no end in sight to the .01%s vampiric gorging on America. I wish I were wrong about the Fed, but I’m not alas.

    As for the blending, just check out Jewish Hollywood some time or our immigration policies. There again, I wish I were wrong..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Every thing you need to know about Buckley is contained in this quote

    “”We have got to accept Big Government for the duration—for neither an offensive nor a defensive war can be waged, given our present government skills, except through the instrument of a totalitarian bureaucracy within our shores. And if they deem Soviet power a menace to our freedom (as I happen to), they will have to support large armies and air forces, atomic energy, central intelligence, war production boards, and the attendant centralization of power in Washington…” – William F. Buckley”

    The man was, and remained until his death a CIA backed tool of the MIC whose main function was to destroy the Taft Republican non-interventionist traditions of the Republican party.

    He succeeded in Spades. Pretty much all of the $18 trillion in government debt is a direct function of the policies enabled by this pos.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Leftist conservative

    But capital isn’t what drives genocidal anti-White policies. Big business wants cheap labor for sure, but they think too short term to plan out generations of anti-White policies.

    White countries with tons of rich businessmen remained White for centuries. It wasn’t until the modern Left and Anti-Whites got the upper hand that EVERY White country came under assault.


     

    A book for you to read: Foundations And Public Policy: The Mask Of Pluralism.

    Foundations means nonprofit foundations, as in like Ford, Rockefeller, etc. These rich plutocrats, along with big corporations, donated money to large nonprofit foundations. These foundations then funded activists, writers, academics, etc.

    What sort of funded activists, writers, academics got money from the upper crust?

    What kind do you think? The kind that write Good Things about females, immigrants and nonwhites and Bad Things about those nasty, brutish, ignorant rednecks and their horrible, ugly white bread culture. Ewww. White people!

    This all started many decades ago. Over the decades, this propaganda developed momentum, inertia, and transformed the culture. Long term? You betcha.

    Capital creates propaganda. Propaganda seeps into the educational curriculum. Stick with me on this: The educational system (carrying the seeds of plutocratic/corporate propaganda) thus shapes young and malleable white minds. Over decades. Long term? You betcha.

    Those minds thus shaped by propaganda go on into adulthood carrying the seeds implanted via propaganda. Supreme Court Justices. Politicians. Actors. Comedians. Teachers. Professors. Educated white folks who then influence and make the laws, policies and cultures of the USA.

    Why does Capital like nonwhites and immigrants? Fecund. Fertile. Innumerable. Driven. Greedy. Ambitious.

    Human Livestock. That is what Capital desires. Can educated whites be a good supply of human livestock, a supply of workers and consumers? A source of growth?

    No.

    Understand this--the modern Left (aka the Pseudo-Left) was created by Capital, made over and reshaped to suit the needs and desires of Capital. Just as Conservatism Inc is a creation of Capital, so too is the Pseudo-Left a creation of Capital. Both of these propaganda regimes are molded and evolved to serve the interests of Capital. Know your enemy, first.

    This all started many decades ago. Over the decades, this propaganda developed momentum, inertia, and transformed the culture…

    Know your enemy, first.

    Here’s a comment I posted previously that warrants reposting:

    The question that has to be asked is: who… is responsible for promoting Political Correctness (PC)?

    The brain-trust behind the promotion of PC is the Frankfurt School. The FS identified nationalism as the root cause of the holocaust. To ensure that another holocaust never occurred again, the FS prescribed cultural Marxism (better known as Political Correctness) as the antidote to nationalism.

    Theodor W. Adorno, a leading member of the Frankfurt School of critical theory, wrote The Authoritarian Personality in 1950. In it, Adorno invented a set of criteria by which to define personality traits, ranking them on what he called the ‘Fascist scale’.

    Here’s how one observer characterized the book’s goal:

    [it] was to eliminate antisemitism by “subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective psychotherapy — by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum.” (emphasis added)

    And hell bent on eradicating PC is a zionist entity with the front name of The Clarion Fund. It is keen on destroying PC, especially in Europe, as the birthrate of Muslims is outstripping that of Christians. The concern is that the jungle will be expanding rather than contracting, thereby making it less safe for the villa.

    The Clarion Fund has produced a trilogy of films – Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West, The Third Jihad, and Iranium – in an effort to get the goy to get there act together and re-embrace nationalism.

    With all this toing and froing between nationlism and political correctness, one gets the sense that the goy are perceived to be puppets whose strings are constantly being pulled by the puppet masters.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @joe webb
    National Conservatism...! Hoo boy, just inches away from National Capitalism, or if you prefer National Socialism, the bad boy of the Right, and I do not make a case for it, but if divorced from its namesake, it suggests that, like the historic compromise of the late 19th century between Capital and Labor in Germany and Europe generally called Social Democracy, then there is an intellectual opening to a new old deal.

    Capital and Wages have a natural virtuous circle relationship, enough Capital for investment and reasonable profit, and enough wages for a consumer driven economy to thrive.

    On top of that, and more importantly of course, is Society, which has a natural internal relationship of man as a social animal who prefers his own kind. A corollary of preference for one's own kind, is the removal of aliens who will never assimilate into White society, or as Wilmot Robertson put it in The Dispossessed Majority a few decades back, White Society.

    None dare call it Reasonable, well some do, but it is eminently reasonable to separate the races and within-race ethnys if that is their wish.

    You want world peace, or relative peace as opposed to warlike liberal cant like the Brotherhood of Man? Then separate and everybody go in relative peace. Back to Africa, etc. for our various racial cousins....Mexico, Middle East and so on.

    Peace in Our Time.

    Let everybody be who they are, without some with their hands out, and others with their complaining, and of course Others with guns and genitals assaulting our Whiteness and our women.

    Joe Webb

    You want world peace, or relative peace as opposed to warlike liberal cant like the Brotherhood of Man?

    How’d that work in Europe?

    And if you want to know just how deeply fucked up the US is, there’s this:

    http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2015/09/one-third-of-americans-would-be-fine-with-the-military-taking-over

    This is Wiemar on steroids

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kevin O'Keeffe
    "And if you want to know just how deeply fucked up the US is, there’s this:

    http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2015/09/one-third-of-americans-would-be-fine-with-the-military-taking-over

    This is Wiemar on steroids"

    Yeah, except that wasn't a bona fide public opinion survey, but just one of those online voting polls, which tell us almost nothing about what the public actually thinks. Kinda like when they'd ask "Who are you going to vote for in the 2012 Republican Presidential primary?," and Ron Paul would get 93 percent, and Mitt Romney would 1.6 percent. Yet in the actual elections, a lot more people voted for Mitt Romney (unfortunately).
    , @joe webb
    Bill, your referenced article: " Online survey shows 29% would support possible takeover while 41% said they could not imagine supporting such an event."

    I don't want to nitpick but an online poll is about as reliable as Chinese pollsters on economics.



    Otoh, still not sure what point you are making. Asking the military to takeover from Jew-tool fools that run us is an interesting idea.

    Joe
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:
    @Sam Shama

    US. Jewish ideal is for white women to have babies with black men while castrated white boys smile like Jeb Bush and applaud such ‘progressive’ act of love.
     
    LOL.

    Ok Priss, just tell then why are 50% of Jewish boys marrying shiksas? I mean seriously, how many blacks are coming into contact with white women? (I don't know, just asking the obvious)

    “Ok Priss, just tell then why are 50% of Jewish boys marrying shiksas?”

    Some Jewish guys don’t care about Jewishness and just wanna do whatever.

    But many Jewish guys who marry non-Jews insist on raising their kids as Jewish.
    Also, there is no pure European Jew as Ashkenazi Jews were, from the very beginning, half European as a bunch of Jewish guys had kids with European women.
    So, you see, that is the basis of Jewishness in the West. Jews can mate with non-Jews, but if the kids are raised as Jewish, the kid is Jewish.

    Now, why are Jewish men not marrying Jewish women as they used to? Cuz too many Jewish women act like Sarah Silverman and Sarah Jessica Parker. They are in-your-face and nasty and vile. In contrast, northern European women tend to be ‘nicer’, like Diane Keaton in ANNIE HALL. (Mia Farrow turned out to be a huge problem for Allen but because she was ‘too nice’, so ‘nice’ in fact that she couldn’t stop adopting all these loser kids, and Allen had enough of it… though one of the kids was fun to play with.)
    When Jews are not going for northern european women(who are less abrasive than Jewish women), they go for East Asian women. East Asians are generally less pushy and abrasive than Jewish women. Indeed, they are milder than even Northern European women. And Allen fell for Soon Yi the baseballmittface(as Howard Stern called her) cuz she’s just so worshipful of Allen. Once Jewish women were ‘liberated’, they began to compete with Jewish men over who was smarter. But even ‘liberated’ Asian women look up to Jewish men and cook supper, so Jewish guys don’t starve. And Jewish men hook them girls with their meaters.

    Anyway, it’s wrong to see Jewish race-mixing with other races as necessarily loss of Jewishness. Jewishness is racial but also interracial and has been for a long time. Jews can tolerate as a Jew someone is who is part Jewish. It’s like Negroes can accept even someone who is 10% black as black. Jewishness is biologically based but also sort of ‘fluid’, which is why there are blonde-and-blue eyed Jews and Jews who look like Gabe Caplan. There are Kirk Douglas Jews and Abe Foxman Jews. While Jews don’t have a one-drop rule, they do have something like a cup Jew. If you got a cup of Jewish blood, you might be accepted as Jewish.

    Also, as Jews go to good schools and mate with higher-IQ gentile girls, they are actually taking elite IQ genes from other races. That advantages the Jew, especially since the kid is likely to take on Jewish identity. So, Jews win out.

    Suppose there are 1000 gentiles at a school. Suppose out of the 100o gentiles, 10 are really smart. If those gentiles marry fellow gentiles and lead their gentile masses, then it’s a boost to gentile power since smart gentiles will lead gentile masses.
    But suppose out of the 10 very smart gentiles, 5 marry Jews and the kids are raised as Jews.
    Then, Jews got extra high IQ genes from gentiles while gentiles have lost elite IQ genes to Jews.

    Given the worship of Jews and Holocaust, everyone wants to be associated with Jewishness(except in Muslim countries, but then, even Saudis prefer to deal with Jews than Shia Muslims).
    Also, being Jewish or part-Jewish means powerful Jews will favor you for promotion. Ivy League schools seem to game the system that favors Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Arius
    Buckley failed because it was he that exiled the old conservatives then brought in James Burnham and others from the Left. Result: the neocons. This is all spelled out in gory detail by others. The wrong question is being asked; the question is why the neocons are in total control of the republican party, a party that now shares the center with the democrats.

    Burnham was not a Neo-Con. They came later.

    Read More
    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    • Replies: @Sam Haysom
    Honestly what is he talking about. Sam Francis admired James Burnahm. And more to the point James Burnham didn't replace anyone he was at NR from the start.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Rurik
    Well done Sir, as usual

    great stuff!

    but don't forget the Eye of Modor of Jewish power

    money

    and their money machine, the Federal Reserve Bank. Without their counterfeit machine, their power would diminish just like the way the orcs dropped over in the movie when the Eye of Mordor came crashing down

    the Fed is the Ring, and as long as they have it, their money will be able to buy and bribe and purchase anything they want. Including handfuls of cucks from Bill Cuckley to Boner to Ron Paul's idiot son to catamites like Jeb.

    It's irresistible as long as it's in their possession.

    that's why they own all the media, academia and nearly every single politician. That's why they own the EU and most European politicians. It's why they own Hollywood and everything they want to own. Because they can hit a key on their computer and "create" trillions of Federal Reserve notes to hand out in secret to whom ever they want, and can thereby buy whatever can be bought. The few things or people, like Ron Paul, that they can not buy, they use their media and corrupt whores in the GOP and shills like Peggy Noonan to marginalize.

    So in order to keep one's eye on the ball, (great analogy), it's important to remember that it is the Fed that their seemingly ubiquitous power flows from.

    This is a great article and I would just add that the Jews are simply following what they perceive to be in their best interest = the systematic genocidal replacement of white people with a blended population of slaves. They've been at that agenda for thousands of years. But what's so nice about this article is who it points out the cucks. Those non-Jewish men who are so willing- kapo like- to betray their own, for a few shekels contemptuously tossed in their direction. Like Bill Buckley (rot in hell) How can you tell which ones are cucks? They love immigrants and Israel.

    Rurik,
    You are wrong yet again about the Fed of course.

    Although you’ve surely outdone yourself this time, as the picture of

    best interest = the systematic genocidal replacement of white people with a blended population of slaves.

    prompted me to hearken back to the song sung to Moses by his Egyptian nanny, with the ‘blended’ (read ridiculously made-up extras of the 1950s set) slaves keeping watch!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Naw Sam, I'm right about the Fed.

    "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence
     
    and that was at the beginning of the 20th century. Look how far they've come at destroying this country and any hope for its future or its people. We are on the brink, and Wall Street is like a bloated tick about to pop- it's so glutted with the wealth of looted Main Street. And there's no end in sight to the .01%s vampiric gorging on America. I wish I were wrong about the Fed, but I'm not alas.

    As for the blending, just check out Jewish Hollywood some time or our immigration policies. There again, I wish I were wrong..
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    American Conservatism is bound to fail because it not only fails to identify its main enemy but shamelessly cucks itself out to it.

    In any fight, you have to identify the enemy and focus the main energy against it.

    The defense of a football team sees the quarterback as the main enemy. It tries to penetrate through the offensive line to sack the quarterback. The focus is on the ball. Quarterback is the first to snap the ball, so he is the main target. If the ball goes to a running back or receiver, then the defense focuses on the runner or receiver.
    That is how the defense holds down the offense and turns the tide.

    American Liberalism wins because it has its eyes focused on its main enemy: white folks, especially conservative white folks. So, American Liberalism, controlled by Jews, has used the power of media, academia, and government to guilt-bait white people, vilify white history, subvert white unity, shame white identity, divide white men and white women by making white college girls believe white boys are 'rapists'. Jews make blacks hate whites for 'racism' and make white women hate white men for 'rapism' even though blacks are top rapists in the US. Jewish ideal is for white women to have babies with black men while castrated white boys smile like Jeb Bush and applaud such 'progressive' act of love.

    Jews control US Liberalism, and they target white identity, white unity, white pride, white consciousness, white power, and etc. No wonder Jews got so powerful. They fix their aim at the bull's eye. They go for head blows. They sack the quarterback.

    Now, when American Conservatism plays defense, it should concentrate its aggressive energy on the core of American Liberal power. It is Jewish power. Next is black power, though recently there's been the super-rise of homo power. There is feminism, but it should really be seen as part of Jewish power since New Feminism was dominated by Jewish feminists and ugly lesbians and given media protection by the Jewish-run media.

    So, American Conservatism should have tried to sack the Jewish quarterback. It should have targeted Jewish power, Jewish unity, Jewish pride, Jewish interest, Jewish identity. American Conservatives should have guilt-shamed Jews about Jewish role in white slaver trade, Jewish role in collaboration with Muslims to take over Spain and Constantinople, Jewish role in communism, and Jewish role in Zionism.
    Of course, IF Jews had been willing to work with whites, whites should have been nice to Jews in return. But in fact, so many Jews have been nasty, vile, and aggressive against whites. Hostility has to be met with hostility.
    Jews were victims of horrible Holocaust, but Jews also took part in some of the worst crimes of the 20th century. And if we look back in history, Jews were directly or indirectly involved with lots of bad stuff, no less(though no more)than whites.
    There is no need for whites to hate Jews(or any people) if Jews don't hate on whites. But if others hate on whites, it is the duty of whites to hate them back. When Japan attacked the US, Americans were right to hit back.

    As for blacks, it's true that blacks suffered from slavery and discrimination in the US. But being stronger and more aggressive, blacks have been mean sons of bitches too, and when they got their equal freedom in the 60s, they've been acting like crazies, louts, punks, thugs, beasks, and ghastly loonies. So, it would have been easy for whites to play victim of blacks. If true white conservatives had control of the media, there would be non-stop coverage of black-on-white violence, the kind presented by Council of Conservative Citizens. And then, blacks would have been put on the moral defensive.

    So, white American Conservatism should have had its eyes on the Jewish quarterback and black running back of American Liberalism, but instead, it refused to ever try to sack the Jewish quarterback. And it went easy on the Negro running back.

    But it got even more surreal. Imagine if a football team invited the assistant coaches of the other team to come over and give orders to the head coach of its own team. So, the team would now be taking advice from the subversive assistant coaches of the other team.
    Eventually, what's gonna happen to the game?
    You can't sack the Jewish quarterback, you can't rough-handle the Negro running back, and furthermore, you got the assistant neocon(Liberal Jews pretending to be 'conservative') coaches from the other team giving advice to your team while slipping all the secrets of your team to the other side. Your team's gonna lose!!!

    The most surreal aspect of US politics is American Conservatism is most slavish and cuckish to the very people, the Jews, who are most determined to kick white ass and take pleasure from the demise of white power, identity, unity, and etc.
    How can anyone win this way?

    Of course, it could be that Jews overplayed their hand by promoting diversity.
    If UK politics portends the future of US politics, then it's possible that the Democratic Party will go the way of Labour. Labour Party recently surprised everyone by totally embracing Muslims, opposing Israel and Zionism, and saying NO to Jewish financial power. BDS is becoming a real possibility in the UK.

    Can this happen in the US? If the GOP cucks itself so much that it submits to Jewish-homo or Jomo domination, it will become the New Democratic Party. It could be a party that Jews could actually feel comfortable in. Tories are urbane and have far less 'white trash' baggage.

    Meanwhile, the Democratic Party could be the new Mexican-Black-Muslim-Asian Party that is increasingly hostile to Israel and Zionism(and also insisting that Jews are part of 'white privilege'). Then, will Jews turn to the GOP?
    For that to be possible, GOP has to become like the British Tories. An urban party of cosmopolitanism that cuts off links with the Southern 'rednecks'.

    But maybe this won't happen in the US because the main minorities will be black and Hispanic than Muslim. Whereas Muslims in Europe have a passionate hatred for Israel, it is not the case among blacks and Hispanics and Asians. Most American minorities may not be crazy about Israel, but they have no strong feelings against it either. So, even though there are some BDS stuff in the US campuses, it's not a big thing here that it could be in Europe where, often, the main minorities are indeed Muslim and/or Arab. So, it's not likely that the Democratic Party will go the way of Labour recently in the UK.

    Also, despite Blair's 'reforms', Labour has had a deep class conscious background, so it can return to its roots of class warfare stance.
    In contrast, even though Democrats were once populists and New Dealers who were close to Big Labor, it doesn't have deep or powerful roots in class warfare consciousness. And that was why it so easily morphed into an urban party of lifestyle issues of homos and the like, and Jews like it that way since they are now the lords of urbanism, especially as key cities have been saved from Negroes.

    Whatever the case, American Conservatism's long term goal must be the breaking of the Jewish power-grip on US and the world. If the Jewish power goes, the Democratic coalition breaks up. Homos are nothing without Jewish backing. Hispanics depend on Jewish money and leadership. Blacks are angry and loud but don't know how to organize anything. Even the Civil Rights Movement was organized and orchestrated by Jews. Asians are grinds and drones, and they won't lead nothing.

    Get the Jew, and the Liberal Coalition is all through. So, how do you get the Jew? Make every group distrust the Jew for different reasons. Tell blacks that Jewish businessmen ripped off blacks in the past. Tell blacks that Jews were involved in slave trade. Tell blacks that Jews are behind stop-and-frisk and gentrification of cities. Tell Mexicans that Jews, not gringos, are the richest people in America. Tell Asians that Jews are the ones in Ivy league schools who cook the books to limit the number of Asians. Tell Asians that Jews use yellow peril fears to make Americans hate Asia instead of waking up to Jewish power. Tell Arab-Americans and Muslims that Jews have been behind US foreign policy that destroyed the Middle East.
    Tell every white ethnic group that Jews have been behind white slavery, collaboration with Muslim invaders, communist mass murder, financial robbery on a huge scale, mega-theft through control of gambling, anti-white propaganda, the promotion of trash culture that has ruined the lives of so many young people, and etc. Tell women that Jews are behind porn that trashes women; Jews are behind pop culture that degrades women.
    Of course, this would be nasty, but remember white people didn't start this. Jews began the war on gentiles just like they began the War on Russia(even though Putin is friendly to Jews). We don't wanna badmouth or fight Jews, but when Jews bash every gentile group --- whites, Muslims, yellows, blacks, etc. ---, it is only right that we all agree on one thing: "We are all Palestinians living under occupation in the Jew World Order." The JWO totally messed up the Middle East. JWO is pushing the homo agenda on Asia. JWO is making Europe taking in tons of migrants who've been shaken loose by Wars for Israel. Jewish power has shaken Russia. Jews use Hollywood to vilify Chinese. Jews use TV to portray Muslims as terrorists. Jews use Movies to blame everything on 'white privilege'. TV crime shows would have us believe that all the criminals in the US are white and male and gentile(when not Russian, Muslim, or Asian spies).

    By morally discrediting Jews and putting them on the defensive, the Liberal crackup will happen. Without Jews to manipulate everything in divide-and-rule way, we will finally have real politics in the US according to identity and real interests. And then, the various groups can come to some kind of compromise on a more honest basis.
    Whites, blacks, browns, yellows, Muslims, and etc should all represent themselves and deal with one another on a direct one-on-one basis. The problem is Jews(and their homo servants) serve as the Middlemen among the various groups. So, whenever whites, blacks, yellows, Muslims, browns, etc wanna do something, they must go through the Jewish broker, and the deal usually comes down to 'support Israel'. It's like 'be sure to drink your ovaltine' in A CHRISTMAS STORY. Because Jews act as mandatory middlemen in the Democratic Party and GOP, all negotiations among various groups finally come down to little more than 'support Israel' or 'be sure to love the Big Jew.'

    Get rid of the middlemen. Let all groups negotiate directly with one another. It won't be easy and differences will remain, but at least we can have a more honest discussion without Jews acting as devious middlemen who turn every issue into 'support Israel and kiss my Jewish ass.'

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdA__2tKoIU

    US. Jewish ideal is for white women to have babies with black men while castrated white boys smile like Jeb Bush and applaud such ‘progressive’ act of love.

    LOL.

    Ok Priss, just tell then why are 50% of Jewish boys marrying shiksas? I mean seriously, how many blacks are coming into contact with white women? (I don’t know, just asking the obvious)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "Ok Priss, just tell then why are 50% of Jewish boys marrying shiksas?"

    Some Jewish guys don't care about Jewishness and just wanna do whatever.

    But many Jewish guys who marry non-Jews insist on raising their kids as Jewish.
    Also, there is no pure European Jew as Ashkenazi Jews were, from the very beginning, half European as a bunch of Jewish guys had kids with European women.
    So, you see, that is the basis of Jewishness in the West. Jews can mate with non-Jews, but if the kids are raised as Jewish, the kid is Jewish.

    Now, why are Jewish men not marrying Jewish women as they used to? Cuz too many Jewish women act like Sarah Silverman and Sarah Jessica Parker. They are in-your-face and nasty and vile. In contrast, northern European women tend to be 'nicer', like Diane Keaton in ANNIE HALL. (Mia Farrow turned out to be a huge problem for Allen but because she was 'too nice', so 'nice' in fact that she couldn't stop adopting all these loser kids, and Allen had enough of it... though one of the kids was fun to play with.)
    When Jews are not going for northern european women(who are less abrasive than Jewish women), they go for East Asian women. East Asians are generally less pushy and abrasive than Jewish women. Indeed, they are milder than even Northern European women. And Allen fell for Soon Yi the baseballmittface(as Howard Stern called her) cuz she's just so worshipful of Allen. Once Jewish women were 'liberated', they began to compete with Jewish men over who was smarter. But even 'liberated' Asian women look up to Jewish men and cook supper, so Jewish guys don't starve. And Jewish men hook them girls with their meaters.

    Anyway, it's wrong to see Jewish race-mixing with other races as necessarily loss of Jewishness. Jewishness is racial but also interracial and has been for a long time. Jews can tolerate as a Jew someone is who is part Jewish. It's like Negroes can accept even someone who is 10% black as black. Jewishness is biologically based but also sort of 'fluid', which is why there are blonde-and-blue eyed Jews and Jews who look like Gabe Caplan. There are Kirk Douglas Jews and Abe Foxman Jews. While Jews don't have a one-drop rule, they do have something like a cup Jew. If you got a cup of Jewish blood, you might be accepted as Jewish.

    Also, as Jews go to good schools and mate with higher-IQ gentile girls, they are actually taking elite IQ genes from other races. That advantages the Jew, especially since the kid is likely to take on Jewish identity. So, Jews win out.

    Suppose there are 1000 gentiles at a school. Suppose out of the 100o gentiles, 10 are really smart. If those gentiles marry fellow gentiles and lead their gentile masses, then it's a boost to gentile power since smart gentiles will lead gentile masses.
    But suppose out of the 10 very smart gentiles, 5 marry Jews and the kids are raised as Jews.
    Then, Jews got extra high IQ genes from gentiles while gentiles have lost elite IQ genes to Jews.

    Given the worship of Jews and Holocaust, everyone wants to be associated with Jewishness(except in Muslim countries, but then, even Saudis prefer to deal with Jews than Shia Muslims).
    Also, being Jewish or part-Jewish means powerful Jews will favor you for promotion. Ivy League schools seem to game the system that favors Jews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • WhatEvvs [AKA "Danuta Tramp"] says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    …but somehow the Beltway Right is always there to tell conservatives to slash the few overwhelmingly popular government programs that actually benefit them.
     
    But if you offer to raise Medicare payments by 50%, the other side will offer to raise them by 75% and call your raise a cut. And those hoary old white folks will still vote to dig their grandchildren's graves.

    I see no way out of this except telling them point blank they have to choose between Medicare and their children's country. Their children will be the ones taxed to pay for the former in any event; nonwhites simply do not pay taxes, so there really is no interracial transfer.

    But if you offer to raise Medicare payments by 50%, the other side will offer to raise them by 75% and call your raise a cut. And those hoary old white folks will still vote to dig their grandchildren’s graves.

    No they WON’T. Geez, guys like you are retch inducing. Really. Guys like you are as bad as the cucks. Get a life, Caesar, talk to some older people. They care about their kids and their grandkids. Do you have any?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Get a life, Caesar, talk to some older people. They care about their kids and their grandkids. Do you have any?
     
    Yeah, I do. They're interrupting me now, and slowing down the replies. My kids are the age of my contemporaries' grandkids, so I get both perspectives at once.

    I didn't say all old people are like that. Hell, I'm the tireless nag on this forum damning everyone else for dumping people into pseudoscientific groupings called "generations" on the thin grounds that they were born about the same time.

    I was talking about benefit-first voters who, as Mr Kirkpatrick reminds us, make those benefits "overwhelmingly popular". Popular enough for swing voters to trade away their grandchildren's country to keep the checks coming in.

    I'm old enough to remember stumping for Goldwater on my neighbor's lawn, even though my 21st birthday was well over a decade in the future.

    Forty million white people voted for their benefits above all else that November-- and millions more would have done the same, had not the benefits party promised them "negro pandemonium" along with the rest. That's one stark lesson for a kid in kneepants. I never forgot it.

    Now most of those voters are dead, and their great-grandchildren are already a minority of their own cohort. Thanks to their ancestors who "voted their pocketbooks".

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Reg Cæsar

    …but somehow the Beltway Right is always there to tell conservatives to slash the few overwhelmingly popular government programs that actually benefit them.
     
    But if you offer to raise Medicare payments by 50%, the other side will offer to raise them by 75% and call your raise a cut. And those hoary old white folks will still vote to dig their grandchildren's graves.

    I see no way out of this except telling them point blank they have to choose between Medicare and their children's country. Their children will be the ones taxed to pay for the former in any event; nonwhites simply do not pay taxes, so there really is no interracial transfer.

    nonwhites simply do not pay taxes, so there really is no interracial transfer.

    Yes from tax paying whites to the non-white never-in-their-lives-taxpaying elderly.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @rod1963
    Buckely did in the NR by purging the nativists and others. He made the NR into a small tent fit for only country club businessmen and approved intellectuals and the like. All others need not apply. Especially populists.

    The whole notion of appealing to the proles or listening to what concerned them was probably revolting to him.

    He created the garden where Neo-Cons could grow and multiply thanks to his support of foreign entanglements and wars.

    What we see today is a result of his efforts. A bizarre magazine run by establishment shills, Neo-Cons and Davos men who are for all intents care nothing for the U.S.

    I watched Buckley’s TV show ‘Firing Line’ for decades. He actually did some good work in the early part of his career. He was far better than mainstream news or PBS. Buckley did publish some outstanding articles by Joe Sobran and others. But once the cold war ended, the neocons totally took over Conservatism, inc. It happened under Reagan’s watch.

    Buckley yielded to the neocons because he was dependent on Jewish money (e.g. Walter Annenberg and others) to keep his TV show and magazine (National Review) afloat. Every white identarian faces this problem once they go national and try to (1) raise money and (2) receive ‘good press’. The hidden hand of world Jewry is everywhere.

    Cohesive and focused Jewish financial and editorial power makes it nearly impossible to be anti-Zionist (‘anti-Semitic’) without being blacklisted, defamed, rendered invisible, and having all political money dry up. Billionaire Trump realizes this. His recent ‘pledge of loyalty’ to the GOP means that he will never deviate from the mainstream US position concerning Washington’s ‘special relationship’ with the Zionist cuckoo. Even a whiff of disloyalty towards Israel would spell political suicide.

    Indeed, if Trump expressed sympathy for the Palestinians or raised the issue of Israeli nukes, he’d get murdered by the press and disowned by the GOP. He fully understands this. Thus, Trump’s ‘moderate’ Iran-hating and Israel-loving positions. This is the state of US politics. We are living under soft occupation.

    Read More
    • Agree: random observer
    • Replies: @silviosilver

    Cohesive and focused Jewish financial and editorial power makes it nearly impossible to be anti-Zionist (‘anti-Semitic’) without being blacklisted, defamed, rendered invisible, and having all political money dry up. Billionaire Trump realizes this. His recent ‘pledge of loyalty’ to the GOP means that he will never deviate from the mainstream US position concerning Washington’s ‘special relationship’ with the Zionist cuckoo. Even a whiff of disloyalty towards Israel would spell political suicide.
     
    You're completely ignoring the cultural context that makes all this possible. Look who just became leader of the British Labour Party. They tried all the smears about 'anti-semitism' on him; public didn't care.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @random observer
    [usual disclaimer- I'm a Canadian. My conservatism is pretty far right for that context but it isn't exactly either American or European in nature. More eclectic. But I've been following American conservatism for 30 years and have read a bit of its history in all that time, and I vest some hope in a conservative version of my American neighbour as a shield of western civilization, even now. Just as strongly, I dread other currents of America that have always been there- the progressivist statism of the past 100 years, the populism, the universalism, the world-perfecting idealism of the American ideal. I'd tolerate the latter if the goal was to make a global America. Barely. But the goal now seems to make America global. Canadian conservatives of every kind always have had that kind of relationship to America... Anyway, random unformed thoughts...]

    Buckleyite conservatism was of its time. It had a purpose, resonance, and maybe a chance in the America it was born into , and which still existed as a sort of shadow America in Reagan's era.

    But it was coming undone from the end of the cold war. Anticommunism was no longer necessary, and there was little left to unite social conservatives and libertarians, or business interests and traditionalists, and the neocons had lost their global ideological rival and could not or would not stand down. And their global ambitions no longer had anything to do with staring down a real challenger, or a cause I would consider a good one, and little if anything to do with national interest.

    So the coalition started fraying and everyone started going their own way. And there was possible never a potential majority for any one or two of them in wider America.

    So there it goes. The Democrats have been fraying in similar ways for even longer, and they have now begun to coalesce around their new, more radical worldview, and already to shape America along those lines.

    Or look at it another way. The 'Progressive' New Deal consensus America of 1933-roughly 1965, based on big government, big business, big labor in a cosy corporatist structure, largely administered by progressive white [WASP-German for the most part] elites and with some elements of social conservatism [though only fitfully religious] collapsed. The new right and the new left competed to replace it for a generation or so. The new left won. it has remade America. The coalition Buckley built could not now form, and would not be a competitor if it did. Its institutional remnant clings to its status, but its ideology has changed a lot since even the 1980s.

    Or to sum it up- the Buckleyites fought against the new left and against the old liberal Republicans. They were utterly defeated by the former and have assumed the water-carrier role of the latter. Because the nature of the issues at stake has changed, they can still validly claim to be more conservative than the old liberal republicans on many social and economic issues, but no one cares. On the issues of the hour, they have taken on Rockefeller's role.

    The old right of the post world war 1 era, to the extent it even was a political coalition, collapsed. It was a no hoper for a generation as the New Deal commanded consensus. The new right of the 1960s has failed in its attempt to defeat the new left for a chance to shape a new consensus. We are now in an era when the progressives of this time again dominate the discourse. More than the New Dealers ever did.

    I can see things I'd like to see salvaged from the new right, as from the old. There were strands of traditionalism there, of religion and nationhood. I could do without too much from the religious evangelical right, but that might just be taste. Some would be good. There was good writing and thinking on the economy, but I could do without dogmatic libertarianism and open borderism that seemed to take over in just the last 20 odd years. There was good writing on constitutionalism and republicanism, good connections made to the deeper past on those issues. For that matter, when I started reading NR, Human Events, and getting books from the Conservative Book Club, they were still talking about Burke, the western tradition, the Anglo Saxon virtues, and publishing Russell Kirk.

    It seems a lot has changed since 1991 and I dread the absence of either a way back, or a way to pick up things of value and bring them forward.

    Buckleyite conservatism was of its time. It had a purpose, resonance, and maybe a chance in the America it was born into , and which still existed as a sort of shadow America in Reagan’s era.

    But it was coming undone from the end of the cold war. Anticommunism was no longer necessary,

    You don’t seem to be too clear on the history. The Buckleyite purges started well before the end of the Cold War. Even the neutered John Birch Society was too radical for Bill Buckley. Things have gotten even worse since the end of the Cold War, but it’s just an intensification of an already-present tendency.

    The ‘Progressive’ New Deal consensus America of 1933-roughly 1965, based on big government, big business, big labor in a cosy corporatist structure, largely administered by progressive white [WASP-German for the most part] elites and with some elements of social conservatism [though only fitfully religious] collapsed.

    Yeah, it just kinda happened, you know? Sorta spontaneous-like. Causelessly. It just suddenly seemed, to everyone all at once via the Jungian collective subconscious, that the idyllic post-War America needed to be ruthlessly burned to the ground and its children turned out. And then fires, they just popped up everywhere. And key parties, let’s not forget the key parties. Just happened one day. For no reason.

    What would Strunk and White say? Who cares, thought, right? Not only were they WASPs, they weren’t even linguists.

    Read More
    • Replies: @random observer
    I know he was purging the Birchers way back in the day. My point was that his kind of conservatism (i.e. the kind he created, so the one he shaped having purged whoever he wanted) was a product of that time and has nothing to say to this era. I happened to augment that by arguing that its irrelevance began with the end of the unifying function of anticommunism, causing its components to spiral off in their own directions, one of which was the sort of unfocused neocon/internationalism/liberalism "conservatism" we see in charge today.

    That strain could only have taken its present form after the end of the Cold War, because only then did the main goal of challenging the USSR end, leaving them room to contemplate their own world revolution [unchecked, so they thought], and because only then did liberalism/progressivism start to really come out in its neo-McGovernite form. Most of the social liberalism of today, for example, was unthinkable to the majority in the 1980s but it started to be propagated openly in the Clinton era. Mass-market TV got even more progressive quite quickly. That created a climate in which the neocons could essentially embrace a progressive, universalist narrative at home, and focus on projecting it abroad.

    I frankly don't see the relevance of Buckley purging the JBS back then to the irrelevance/disintegration of his type of conservatism today. If he had not purged JBS, his type of conservatism would not have had anything to say to the majority right from the start, never mind becoming irrelevant 30 years later. His conservatism would have been stillborn and there would have been no vaguely conservative voice at all in the 1960s-80s. Look at how much the left accomplished in those years with weak opposition. Now imagine no opposition existed at all. The Birchers' version of conservatism wasn't going to provide it. If they had been capable of winning anything like that level of support, they would have done it with or without him.

    Now, I agree with your contention that the tendency of modern Conservatism Inc to purge its internal enemies is an extension of what Buckley did. But that was not my point. My point was that the movement he created by doing that had its time and after that time had nothing left of value to say to a changed era.

    Besides, all political movements end up defining themselves by including some and excluding others. If the excluded are up to it and have an audience willing to hear them, they will succeed anyway and overtake those who purged them. Buckley and his conservatives hardly created this cycle ex nihilo.

    On the collapse of New Deal America, I don't know what all that is supposed to mean. I said it collapsed. I didn't say it "just happened" or speculate on all the reasons involved, interests at play, or individuals at work. So I'm not sure there is any disagreement here. I would, at this point, observe that it is nevertheless so that political and social change on that scale does, on some level, just happen. History can be nudged along by people willing to say and do things and see where the chips fall. But even that happens at the margins. Too many moving parts have to work at their own pace and one has to take advantage of what is already happening rather than seek to wholly change course. Big History is not planned.

    It's pretty hard for the secret council of twenty to engineer a huge transcontinental baby boom with consequent large bulge of youth seeking to define themselves, also engineer unprecedented prosperity so that they feel free to pursue a more open approach to doing that, and parents who want to indulge them, AND have already engineered an apocalyptic war whose excesses start to alter the moral compass of the entire society and offer a convenient ideological bludgeon to radicals. I know I find those planning sessions exhausting and ultimately futile. The last meeting just dragged on forever.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jason
    But capital isn't what drives genocidal anti-White policies. Big business wants cheap labor for sure, but they think too short term to plan out generations of anti-White policies.

    White countries with tons of rich businessmen remained White for centuries. It wasn't until the modern Left and Anti-Whites got the upper hand that EVERY White country came under assault.

    Oh, come on. Capital was enthusiastic about the Great Wave of immigration from Europe to the US. When WWI ended that, Capital promptly substituted the Great Migration of blacks to the formerly lily white North. Capital imported coolies to work on its railroads. Capital imports coolies, wogs, and wetbacks now.

    Capital is happy to depress wages by importing poor whites. Capital is happy to depress wages by importing poor blacks. Capital is happy to depress wages by importing poor Chinese. Capital is happy to depress wages by importing poor Mestizos. Capital is happy to depress wages by importing poor Indians. If ever cultural marxism ceases to be useful to Capital, cultural marxism will go by the wayside. It’s just a PR strategy.

    The libertardians are right about Capital: it is completely and entirely amoral, mechanistic, and inhuman. It’s just that they think these are good things. Just ask Bryan Caplan.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jason
    Yes, I agree "Capital" is happy with cheap labor. But they don't fundamentally drive long term immigration policy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Buckely did in the NR by purging the nativists and others. He made the NR into a small tent fit for only country club businessmen and approved intellectuals and the like. All others need not apply. Especially populists.

    The whole notion of appealing to the proles or listening to what concerned them was probably revolting to him.

    He created the garden where Neo-Cons could grow and multiply thanks to his support of foreign entanglements and wars.

    What we see today is a result of his efforts. A bizarre magazine run by establishment shills, Neo-Cons and Davos men who are for all intents care nothing for the U.S.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark Green
    I watched Buckley's TV show 'Firing Line' for decades. He actually did some good work in the early part of his career. He was far better than mainstream news or PBS. Buckley did publish some outstanding articles by Joe Sobran and others. But once the cold war ended, the neocons totally took over Conservatism, inc. It happened under Reagan's watch.

    Buckley yielded to the neocons because he was dependent on Jewish money (e.g. Walter Annenberg and others) to keep his TV show and magazine (National Review) afloat. Every white identarian faces this problem once they go national and try to (1) raise money and (2) receive 'good press'. The hidden hand of world Jewry is everywhere.

    Cohesive and focused Jewish financial and editorial power makes it nearly impossible to be anti-Zionist ('anti-Semitic') without being blacklisted, defamed, rendered invisible, and having all political money dry up. Billionaire Trump realizes this. His recent 'pledge of loyalty' to the GOP means that he will never deviate from the mainstream US position concerning Washington's 'special relationship' with the Zionist cuckoo. Even a whiff of disloyalty towards Israel would spell political suicide.

    Indeed, if Trump expressed sympathy for the Palestinians or raised the issue of Israeli nukes, he'd get murdered by the press and disowned by the GOP. He fully understands this. Thus, Trump's 'moderate' Iran-hating and Israel-loving positions. This is the state of US politics. We are living under soft occupation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • What a great article.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    One thing for sure, we must resist the power of Narrative Supremacism.

    Reality is so complex. Every people, group, interest, society, nation, and identity has its own narrative. Their own perspective, subjectivity, experience.

    The problem in the West is the rise of Narrative Supremacism controlled by the Jomo Power Complex that forces a Jomocentric Narrativity on everything.

    Look at the Iran issue. We are flooded with Zio-globalist Narrative Supremacism that only ‘privileges’ Jewish interests, fears, worries, and etc. Never mind that Iran, a law-abiding nation when it comes to nuclear power, has suffered so much due to sanctions that, by the way, weren’t applied to Israel that has 300 illegal nukes.

    And look the Ukraine Crisis. Total Narrative Supremacism on the part of the Jomo Power Complex. Jews hate Russia cuz Putin foiled total Jewish takeover of that country, and Homos hate Russia cuz it won’t worship homos and allow them to have victory homo parades in Red Square that has commemorated the sacrifice of 25 million Russians in defeat of Nazi Germany in WWII. Homos think their fecal-penetrative celebration should trump the glory of Russian history, heritage, and sacred memory. They want Russia to become like United States of Amnesia where the only culture is homo worship promoted by TV, Hollywood, and Wall Street.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marian
    I agree with everything but why Capitol likes immigrants. They like them for being not ambitious. They love them for being compliant, faceless, and never questioning. Last thing money wants is any challenges to their power.

    ….capital…

    FIFY

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Reg Cæsar

    …but somehow the Beltway Right is always there to tell conservatives to slash the few overwhelmingly popular government programs that actually benefit them.
     
    But if you offer to raise Medicare payments by 50%, the other side will offer to raise them by 75% and call your raise a cut. And those hoary old white folks will still vote to dig their grandchildren's graves.

    I see no way out of this except telling them point blank they have to choose between Medicare and their children's country. Their children will be the ones taxed to pay for the former in any event; nonwhites simply do not pay taxes, so there really is no interracial transfer.

    Cut military spending.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Leftist conservative

    But capital isn’t what drives genocidal anti-White policies. Big business wants cheap labor for sure, but they think too short term to plan out generations of anti-White policies.

    White countries with tons of rich businessmen remained White for centuries. It wasn’t until the modern Left and Anti-Whites got the upper hand that EVERY White country came under assault.


     

    A book for you to read: Foundations And Public Policy: The Mask Of Pluralism.

    Foundations means nonprofit foundations, as in like Ford, Rockefeller, etc. These rich plutocrats, along with big corporations, donated money to large nonprofit foundations. These foundations then funded activists, writers, academics, etc.

    What sort of funded activists, writers, academics got money from the upper crust?

    What kind do you think? The kind that write Good Things about females, immigrants and nonwhites and Bad Things about those nasty, brutish, ignorant rednecks and their horrible, ugly white bread culture. Ewww. White people!

    This all started many decades ago. Over the decades, this propaganda developed momentum, inertia, and transformed the culture. Long term? You betcha.

    Capital creates propaganda. Propaganda seeps into the educational curriculum. Stick with me on this: The educational system (carrying the seeds of plutocratic/corporate propaganda) thus shapes young and malleable white minds. Over decades. Long term? You betcha.

    Those minds thus shaped by propaganda go on into adulthood carrying the seeds implanted via propaganda. Supreme Court Justices. Politicians. Actors. Comedians. Teachers. Professors. Educated white folks who then influence and make the laws, policies and cultures of the USA.

    Why does Capital like nonwhites and immigrants? Fecund. Fertile. Innumerable. Driven. Greedy. Ambitious.

    Human Livestock. That is what Capital desires. Can educated whites be a good supply of human livestock, a supply of workers and consumers? A source of growth?

    No.

    Understand this--the modern Left (aka the Pseudo-Left) was created by Capital, made over and reshaped to suit the needs and desires of Capital. Just as Conservatism Inc is a creation of Capital, so too is the Pseudo-Left a creation of Capital. Both of these propaganda regimes are molded and evolved to serve the interests of Capital. Know your enemy, first.

    Human Livestock. That is what Capital desires. Can educated whites be a good supply of human livestock, a supply of workers and consumers? A source of growth?

    No.

    Yeah, not buying that. You need to explain why you say, “No.”, because you blew your whole premise right there.

    Read More
    • Replies: @sure thing
    The key word is 'educated'.

    As in the ability to reason through the development of the critical faculties, primarily through literacy, Capital's worst enemy. ( Which is why it flooded the universities with po-mo, which has led to homo 'marriage', or eugenics-by-stealth. Always an obsession of the plutocracy - check out the Rockefeller-Mengele funding connection.)

    First you make folk stupid. That way they internalize their own degradation and become pliant cattle. The well-educated resist the indoctrination, they can join the dots and have the means - and desire - for argument.

    Radcentrist is walking just fine.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • National Conservatism…! Hoo boy, just inches away from National Capitalism, or if you prefer National Socialism, the bad boy of the Right, and I do not make a case for it, but if divorced from its namesake, it suggests that, like the historic compromise of the late 19th century between Capital and Labor in Germany and Europe generally called Social Democracy, then there is an intellectual opening to a new old deal.

    Capital and Wages have a natural virtuous circle relationship, enough Capital for investment and reasonable profit, and enough wages for a consumer driven economy to thrive.

    On top of that, and more importantly of course, is Society, which has a natural internal relationship of man as a social animal who prefers his own kind. A corollary of preference for one’s own kind, is the removal of aliens who will never assimilate into White society, or as Wilmot Robertson put it in The Dispossessed Majority a few decades back, White Society.

    None dare call it Reasonable, well some do, but it is eminently reasonable to separate the races and within-race ethnys if that is their wish.

    You want world peace, or relative peace as opposed to warlike liberal cant like the Brotherhood of Man? Then separate and everybody go in relative peace. Back to Africa, etc. for our various racial cousins….Mexico, Middle East and so on.

    Peace in Our Time.

    Let everybody be who they are, without some with their hands out, and others with their complaining, and of course Others with guns and genitals assaulting our Whiteness and our women.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    You want world peace, or relative peace as opposed to warlike liberal cant like the Brotherhood of Man?

    How'd that work in Europe?

    And if you want to know just how deeply fucked up the US is, there's this:
    http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2015/09/one-third-of-americans-would-be-fine-with-the-military-taking-over

    This is Wiemar on steroids

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • [usual disclaimer- I'm a Canadian. My conservatism is pretty far right for that context but it isn't exactly either American or European in nature. More eclectic. But I've been following American conservatism for 30 years and have read a bit of its history in all that time, and I vest some hope in a conservative version of my American neighbour as a shield of western civilization, even now. Just as strongly, I dread other currents of America that have always been there- the progressivist statism of the past 100 years, the populism, the universalism, the world-perfecting idealism of the American ideal. I'd tolerate the latter if the goal was to make a global America. Barely. But the goal now seems to make America global. Canadian conservatives of every kind always have had that kind of relationship to America... Anyway, random unformed thoughts...]

    Buckleyite conservatism was of its time. It had a purpose, resonance, and maybe a chance in the America it was born into , and which still existed as a sort of shadow America in Reagan’s era.

    But it was coming undone from the end of the cold war. Anticommunism was no longer necessary, and there was little left to unite social conservatives and libertarians, or business interests and traditionalists, and the neocons had lost their global ideological rival and could not or would not stand down. And their global ambitions no longer had anything to do with staring down a real challenger, or a cause I would consider a good one, and little if anything to do with national interest.

    So the coalition started fraying and everyone started going their own way. And there was possible never a potential majority for any one or two of them in wider America.

    So there it goes. The Democrats have been fraying in similar ways for even longer, and they have now begun to coalesce around their new, more radical worldview, and already to shape America along those lines.

    Or look at it another way. The ‘Progressive’ New Deal consensus America of 1933-roughly 1965, based on big government, big business, big labor in a cosy corporatist structure, largely administered by progressive white [WASP-German for the most part] elites and with some elements of social conservatism [though only fitfully religious] collapsed. The new right and the new left competed to replace it for a generation or so. The new left won. it has remade America. The coalition Buckley built could not now form, and would not be a competitor if it did. Its institutional remnant clings to its status, but its ideology has changed a lot since even the 1980s.

    Or to sum it up- the Buckleyites fought against the new left and against the old liberal Republicans. They were utterly defeated by the former and have assumed the water-carrier role of the latter. Because the nature of the issues at stake has changed, they can still validly claim to be more conservative than the old liberal republicans on many social and economic issues, but no one cares. On the issues of the hour, they have taken on Rockefeller’s role.

    The old right of the post world war 1 era, to the extent it even was a political coalition, collapsed. It was a no hoper for a generation as the New Deal commanded consensus. The new right of the 1960s has failed in its attempt to defeat the new left for a chance to shape a new consensus. We are now in an era when the progressives of this time again dominate the discourse. More than the New Dealers ever did.

    I can see things I’d like to see salvaged from the new right, as from the old. There were strands of traditionalism there, of religion and nationhood. I could do without too much from the religious evangelical right, but that might just be taste. Some would be good. There was good writing and thinking on the economy, but I could do without dogmatic libertarianism and open borderism that seemed to take over in just the last 20 odd years. There was good writing on constitutionalism and republicanism, good connections made to the deeper past on those issues. For that matter, when I started reading NR, Human Events, and getting books from the Conservative Book Club, they were still talking about Burke, the western tradition, the Anglo Saxon virtues, and publishing Russell Kirk.

    It seems a lot has changed since 1991 and I dread the absence of either a way back, or a way to pick up things of value and bring them forward.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill

    Buckleyite conservatism was of its time. It had a purpose, resonance, and maybe a chance in the America it was born into , and which still existed as a sort of shadow America in Reagan’s era.

    But it was coming undone from the end of the cold war. Anticommunism was no longer necessary,
     
    You don't seem to be too clear on the history. The Buckleyite purges started well before the end of the Cold War. Even the neutered John Birch Society was too radical for Bill Buckley. Things have gotten even worse since the end of the Cold War, but it's just an intensification of an already-present tendency.

    The ‘Progressive’ New Deal consensus America of 1933-roughly 1965, based on big government, big business, big labor in a cosy corporatist structure, largely administered by progressive white [WASP-German for the most part] elites and with some elements of social conservatism [though only fitfully religious] collapsed.
     
    Yeah, it just kinda happened, you know? Sorta spontaneous-like. Causelessly. It just suddenly seemed, to everyone all at once via the Jungian collective subconscious, that the idyllic post-War America needed to be ruthlessly burned to the ground and its children turned out. And then fires, they just popped up everywhere. And key parties, let's not forget the key parties. Just happened one day. For no reason.

    What would Strunk and White say? Who cares, thought, right? Not only were they WASPs, they weren't even linguists.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Tom_R
    USA: 3RD MOST POPULOUS NATION ON EARTH--TIME TO BAN ALL IMMIGRATION.

    Thanks for the great article. I agree with you that the Republicans will not win by becoming supporting the alien invasion, by becoming pseudo-Democrats. 90% of these 3rd world aliens will always vote for the Democratic party. Immigration will make the Republican party's "Demographic problem" worse, not better. A few more points:

    1. The USA is the 3rd most populous nation on earth. The first 2 have 0 immigration, only net E-migration (Out). The world population is 6 billion; we cannot fit the whole world here.

    2. Alienism is a sure sign of a liberal nut, especially a Jewish liberal. When Judaists like Goldberg or Kristol support immigration, while posing as conservatives, people can see through his scam. A true conservative will be more civilized and will not sell his mother or his motherland like some Judaists and would want to ban immigration.

    3. A small magazine like National Review is not any reason for any Republicans to base any decisions on, especially immigration where the nation and the white majority faces an existential threat.

    4. Though the USA is purportedly as a democracy and banning immigration is the right, moral and ethical thing to do and is in the national interest and is supported by the majority, the fact that it has not happened so far proves that a criminal gang controls and subverses our politicians and prevents them from doing what is right and in the national interest. This subversive criminal gang is the Jewish lobby which provides 50% of the campaign contributions of the Democrats (and 40% of the Republicans). The fact that this lobby can muzzle and oppress the majority and subvert its interest is criminal and shocking. The lobby openly fights against immigration control. See:

    http://newobserveronline.com/jews-demand-open-borders-for-usa-but-use-dna-to-keep-israel-racially-pure/

    This is a crime against humanity.

    The US is a republic. It once had democratic principles, but that is no longer true. It is now a fascist oligarchy run police state.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.