The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / On "Cognitive Elitism"
 All Comments / On "Cognitive Elitism"
    Well, apart from the Gulf states - thanks in large part to coming from such a low base that even subcontinental coolies are an improvement over the natives. Otherwise, the cognitive impact of immigration - at least as proxied by the differences in performance on the PISA tests between the national average, which includes immigrant...
  • Do you mind if I quote a couple of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to your webpage?
    My blog is in the very same niche as yours and my users would
    truly benefit from a lot of the information you present
    here. Please let me know if this alright with you. Many thanks!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Excellent site. Plenty of helpful info here. I’m sending it to some friends ans
    also sharing in delicious. And of course, thanks in your sweat!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RaceRealist88
    Dude, reread his entire comment and then rethink your statement. I don't think he's denying it because he's 'a leftist'.

    Nevermind this,

    https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2012-damico.pdf

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236970447_The_case_against_Lynn's_doctrine_that_population_IQ_determines_levels_of_socio-economic_development_and_public_health_status

    Hey RR88,

    Thanks for those links – good stuff!

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @M
    @Cicerone, it's the same story here.

    For 2016, the Annex B (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-results-volume-i/results-tables-immigrant-background-student-performance-and-students-attitudes-towards-science_9789264266490-table125-en;jsessionid=k37wmcvo1of9.x-oecd-live-03) drills down to scores for subregions.

    Math, Science and Reading for subregions and Science broken down into both subregions and migrant background or not.

    For Italy, for Natives and Science, you get:

    Italy Bolzano - 522
    Italy Trento - 518
    Italy Lombaria - 510
    Italy Campania - 449

    which compared with Native scores of:

    Japan - 539
    Switzerland - 527
    Spain Castile and Leon - 523
    UK England - 520
    Korea - 516
    UK Northern Ireland - 509
    UK Scotland - 498
    UK Wales - 488
    Spain Extremadura - 476
    Greece - 461
    Bulgaria - 450
    Turkey - 427

    So assuming Science is not a big outlier for these places, using a quick regression equation on Science scores against the "IQ" I worked out before ("IQ" = 6.8964+(0.18308*Science) ), that translates to a Native "IQ":

    Italy Bolzano - 102.4
    Italy Trento - 101.7
    Italy Lombaria - 100.3
    Italy Campania - 89.0

    UK England - 102.1
    UK Northern Ireland - 100.1
    UK Scotland - 98.1
    UK Wales - 96.2

    Spain Castile and Leon - 102.7
    Spain Extramadura - 94.0

    Scores based on all 3 PISA variables (if we had them) would probably wobble a point or so from that in either direction.

    The education or "IQ" gap in Italy is by far the biggest in any European nation, and along with Cypriots, Montenegrins, Romanians and Bulgarians, Southern Italians seem to be the worst participating Europeans, while Northern Italians score comparably to Northwest Europeans and almost as well as the top performing Central European natives (German and Swiss). Differences in Spain (the North vs South) and the UK (England vs the Welsh periphery) are not quite as big.

    It is a puzzle as to whether that reflects any kind of genetic difference, or it is more difference in the cultural approach and deprivation and funding. I think its hard for me to imagine its mainly a genetic difference.

    I think its hard for me to imagine its mainly a genetic difference.

    why*

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Santoculto
    ''I think its hard for me to imagine its mainly a genetic difference.''

    Because you're a leftist.

    I think its hard for me to imagine its mainly a genetic difference.

    why*

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Someone here have brain damage, i already read this papers and already shown my considerations.

    Remember*

    Weak working memory.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Santoculto
    ''I think its hard for me to imagine its mainly a genetic difference.''

    Because you're a leftist.

    Dude, reread his entire comment and then rethink your statement. I don’t think he’s denying it because he’s ‘a leftist’.

    Nevermind this,

    https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2012-damico.pdf

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236970447_The_case_against_Lynn’s_doctrine_that_population_IQ_determines_levels_of_socio-economic_development_and_public_health_status

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey RR88,

    Thanks for those links - good stuff!

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @M
    @Cicerone, it's the same story here.

    For 2016, the Annex B (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-results-volume-i/results-tables-immigrant-background-student-performance-and-students-attitudes-towards-science_9789264266490-table125-en;jsessionid=k37wmcvo1of9.x-oecd-live-03) drills down to scores for subregions.

    Math, Science and Reading for subregions and Science broken down into both subregions and migrant background or not.

    For Italy, for Natives and Science, you get:

    Italy Bolzano - 522
    Italy Trento - 518
    Italy Lombaria - 510
    Italy Campania - 449

    which compared with Native scores of:

    Japan - 539
    Switzerland - 527
    Spain Castile and Leon - 523
    UK England - 520
    Korea - 516
    UK Northern Ireland - 509
    UK Scotland - 498
    UK Wales - 488
    Spain Extremadura - 476
    Greece - 461
    Bulgaria - 450
    Turkey - 427

    So assuming Science is not a big outlier for these places, using a quick regression equation on Science scores against the "IQ" I worked out before ("IQ" = 6.8964+(0.18308*Science) ), that translates to a Native "IQ":

    Italy Bolzano - 102.4
    Italy Trento - 101.7
    Italy Lombaria - 100.3
    Italy Campania - 89.0

    UK England - 102.1
    UK Northern Ireland - 100.1
    UK Scotland - 98.1
    UK Wales - 96.2

    Spain Castile and Leon - 102.7
    Spain Extramadura - 94.0

    Scores based on all 3 PISA variables (if we had them) would probably wobble a point or so from that in either direction.

    The education or "IQ" gap in Italy is by far the biggest in any European nation, and along with Cypriots, Montenegrins, Romanians and Bulgarians, Southern Italians seem to be the worst participating Europeans, while Northern Italians score comparably to Northwest Europeans and almost as well as the top performing Central European natives (German and Swiss). Differences in Spain (the North vs South) and the UK (England vs the Welsh periphery) are not quite as big.

    It is a puzzle as to whether that reflects any kind of genetic difference, or it is more difference in the cultural approach and deprivation and funding. I think its hard for me to imagine its mainly a genetic difference.

    ”I think its hard for me to imagine its mainly a genetic difference.”

    Because you’re a leftist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RaceRealist88
    Dude, reread his entire comment and then rethink your statement. I don't think he's denying it because he's 'a leftist'.

    Nevermind this,

    https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2012-damico.pdf

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236970447_The_case_against_Lynn's_doctrine_that_population_IQ_determines_levels_of_socio-economic_development_and_public_health_status

    , @Santoculto

    I think its hard for me to imagine its mainly a genetic difference.
     
    why*
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • About PISA scores…

    Estonia have a greater % of ethnic minorities, result of the ”russification policy” during the soviet ”sweet” years. Ethnic estonians, who are genetically finnic-ugric, were better in PISA tests, similar to the finnish kids & teens, than those on the ethnic minorities*

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @LondonBob
    Very scary looking at state schoolchildren in London, African demographics. Future is grim, unless we change it.

    Just visited Moscow having been away for several years, felt a lot more Asian than last time.

    [Future is grim, unless we change it]

    Absolutely. And to change it, measures taken would have to be radical.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Very scary looking at state schoolchildren in London, African demographics. Future is grim, unless we change it.

    Just visited Moscow having been away for several years, felt a lot more Asian than last time.

    Read More
    • Replies: @5371
    [Future is grim, unless we change it]

    Absolutely. And to change it, measures taken would have to be radical.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • […] „Not Sending Their Best”: World Map of IQ Drop Due to Immigration […]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I can say it in one word – Africa.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @reiner Tor
    It's probably worse than that: immigrants might be brighter than the population they leave behind in their home countries. So it might decrease IQs in their original countries as well...

    Definitely.

    This is the problem with Africa and the Carribean.

    The best and brightest head to the UK, USA, and Canada

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @M
    @Cicerone, it's the same story here.

    For 2016, the Annex B (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-results-volume-i/results-tables-immigrant-background-student-performance-and-students-attitudes-towards-science_9789264266490-table125-en;jsessionid=k37wmcvo1of9.x-oecd-live-03) drills down to scores for subregions.

    Math, Science and Reading for subregions and Science broken down into both subregions and migrant background or not.

    For Italy, for Natives and Science, you get:

    Italy Bolzano - 522
    Italy Trento - 518
    Italy Lombaria - 510
    Italy Campania - 449

    which compared with Native scores of:

    Japan - 539
    Switzerland - 527
    Spain Castile and Leon - 523
    UK England - 520
    Korea - 516
    UK Northern Ireland - 509
    UK Scotland - 498
    UK Wales - 488
    Spain Extremadura - 476
    Greece - 461
    Bulgaria - 450
    Turkey - 427

    So assuming Science is not a big outlier for these places, using a quick regression equation on Science scores against the "IQ" I worked out before ("IQ" = 6.8964+(0.18308*Science) ), that translates to a Native "IQ":

    Italy Bolzano - 102.4
    Italy Trento - 101.7
    Italy Lombaria - 100.3
    Italy Campania - 89.0

    UK England - 102.1
    UK Northern Ireland - 100.1
    UK Scotland - 98.1
    UK Wales - 96.2

    Spain Castile and Leon - 102.7
    Spain Extramadura - 94.0

    Scores based on all 3 PISA variables (if we had them) would probably wobble a point or so from that in either direction.

    The education or "IQ" gap in Italy is by far the biggest in any European nation, and along with Cypriots, Montenegrins, Romanians and Bulgarians, Southern Italians seem to be the worst participating Europeans, while Northern Italians score comparably to Northwest Europeans and almost as well as the top performing Central European natives (German and Swiss). Differences in Spain (the North vs South) and the UK (England vs the Welsh periphery) are not quite as big.

    It is a puzzle as to whether that reflects any kind of genetic difference, or it is more difference in the cultural approach and deprivation and funding. I think its hard for me to imagine its mainly a genetic difference.
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cicerone
    I have heard that the Lynn figures on Italy were in fact drawn from a sample of Northern Italians. In this case, their IQ estimate resembles the PISA results of 2012 for Northern Italy perfectly. Results for Italian regions were available in the 2012 round and Northern Italy came in at around 102, Central Italy at 98 and Southern Italy at 94, similar to Greece.

    besides that, many of the studies Lynn cited, had only very small sample sizes, often in the double-digits, so they can only give a rough estimation. PISA tests, even though they are not designated IQ tests, have a much bigger sample size, and I'd say if you even them out across some rounds, you'll get pretty accurate estimates for developed countries.

    , it’s the same story here.

    For 2016, the Annex B (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-results-volume-i/results-tables-immigrant-background-student-performance-and-students-attitudes-towards-science_9789264266490-table125-en;jsessionid=k37wmcvo1of9.x-oecd-live-03) drills down to scores for subregions.

    Math, Science and Reading for subregions and Science broken down into both subregions and migrant background or not.

    For Italy, for Natives and Science, you get:

    Italy Bolzano – 522
    Italy Trento – 518
    Italy Lombaria – 510
    Italy Campania – 449

    which compared with Native scores of:

    Japan – 539
    Switzerland – 527
    Spain Castile and Leon – 523
    UK England – 520
    Korea – 516
    UK Northern Ireland – 509
    UK Scotland – 498
    UK Wales – 488
    Spain Extremadura – 476
    Greece – 461
    Bulgaria – 450
    Turkey – 427

    So assuming Science is not a big outlier for these places, using a quick regression equation on Science scores against the “IQ” I worked out before (“IQ” = 6.8964+(0.18308*Science) ), that translates to a Native “IQ”:

    Italy Bolzano – 102.4
    Italy Trento – 101.7
    Italy Lombaria – 100.3
    Italy Campania – 89.0

    UK England – 102.1
    UK Northern Ireland – 100.1
    UK Scotland – 98.1
    UK Wales – 96.2

    Spain Castile and Leon – 102.7
    Spain Extramadura – 94.0

    Scores based on all 3 PISA variables (if we had them) would probably wobble a point or so from that in either direction.

    The education or “IQ” gap in Italy is by far the biggest in any European nation, and along with Cypriots, Montenegrins, Romanians and Bulgarians, Southern Italians seem to be the worst participating Europeans, while Northern Italians score comparably to Northwest Europeans and almost as well as the top performing Central European natives (German and Swiss). Differences in Spain (the North vs South) and the UK (England vs the Welsh periphery) are not quite as big.

    It is a puzzle as to whether that reflects any kind of genetic difference, or it is more difference in the cultural approach and deprivation and funding. I think its hard for me to imagine its mainly a genetic difference.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ali Choudhury
    It would be good to have your thoughts on the below:

    https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/11/03/northsouth-differences-in-italian-iq-is-richard-lynn-right-part-ii/
    , @Santoculto
    ''I think its hard for me to imagine its mainly a genetic difference.''

    Because you're a leftist.
    , @Santoculto

    I think its hard for me to imagine its mainly a genetic difference.
     
    why*
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Willem
    This also doesn't help in understanding what this paper is actually about, i.e. not race, but class

    'Western Europe is a complete disaster zone, getting a harder cognitive hit even though the immigrant share of their population is considerably smaller than the US, where they constitute almost a quarter of the PISA-taking population. The German national average takes an astounding 2.4 IQ point hit due to immigrants. Moreover, there is no full convergence between first and second generation immigrants. Although one can hope the children of all those Syrian “doctors and engineers” will go on to become productive and loyal citizens, past experience suggests that they will merely bolster the sullen ranks of a permanent, growing, ethnically distinct, and highly criminalized underclass.'

    See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Germany

    So there are 82 million Germans of which 17 million are immigrants

    Let’s do the maths

    (65*100+17u)/82=97.6

    u=88

    So the average IQ of an immigrant is 88.

    Fair enough, that is below average and maybe true (if you believe the report, which maybe is the best evidence we have).

    Is that IQ so low because they ‘are not sending their best’?

    Let’s do a thought experiment and say that we are in early 19th century America where a study found that ‘the negro’ (so they were called at that time) had on average a lower IQ than ‘the white man’. Would that lead to the conclusion that

    a) slave drivers had not sent their best from Africa to the US (this is what your title is suggesting)

    b) that negroes are intellectualy inferior to the white man and will therefore ‘bolster the sullen ranks of a permanent, growing, ethnically distinct, and highly criminalized underclass’ (as you say in your article when you talk about the children of Syrian refugees)

    Let’s talk about opportunity (ad b)
    - Your article completely missed the fact that immigrants who come to for instance Germany often don’t speak German, are held, sometimes for years, in asylums where there is nothing else to do but pray that they are not sent back to their war ridden country, are discriminated by the native population through and through, are only good enough to do the shitty jobs, and that therefore they and their offspring have a lower chance to start with to get a fair education which could raise their IQ to levels that are above the Trobianders (‘in this world’ is a nice fictional documentary that touches this problem of the immigrant). This is what I missed in your article. That they ‘will bolster the sullen ranks of a permanent, growing, ethnically distinct, and highly criminalized underclass’ only depends if they are giving a fair chance to get an equal education as the natives have. Which leads to ad a)

    ad a) your article has not shown that they are ‘not sending their best’. ‘They’ (whoever they are), might have sent their best, but since they did not get a fair chance to achieve a similar education as the natives, they will have less opportunity to raise their IQ to levels that are comparable with the natives.

    If you want to do something about that inequality, which I am sure you want to, you would not start your article by saying that they did not sent their best.

    I was wrong by saying that this paper should be retracted and I am sorry for having said that. It is just that if I were you, I would have retracted it, because the article highly suggests that racism is the cause for a drop in average IQ levels in countries like Germany due to immigrants. While it is actually more likely because of less opportunity given to immigrants by the natives.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Willem
    It is stated in your title. Or so I read it.

    If you look at the comments, many did too.

    This paper is flawed. It should be retracted.

    This also doesn’t help in understanding what this paper is actually about, i.e. not race, but class

    ‘Western Europe is a complete disaster zone, getting a harder cognitive hit even though the immigrant share of their population is considerably smaller than the US, where they constitute almost a quarter of the PISA-taking population. The German national average takes an astounding 2.4 IQ point hit due to immigrants. Moreover, there is no full convergence between first and second generation immigrants. Although one can hope the children of all those Syrian “doctors and engineers” will go on to become productive and loyal citizens, past experience suggests that they will merely bolster the sullen ranks of a permanent, growing, ethnically distinct, and highly criminalized underclass.’

    Read More
    • Replies: @Willem
    See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Germany

    So there are 82 million Germans of which 17 million are immigrants

    Let's do the maths

    (65*100+17u)/82=97.6

    u=88

    So the average IQ of an immigrant is 88.

    Fair enough, that is below average and maybe true (if you believe the report, which maybe is the best evidence we have).

    Is that IQ so low because they 'are not sending their best'?

    Let's do a thought experiment and say that we are in early 19th century America where a study found that 'the negro' (so they were called at that time) had on average a lower IQ than 'the white man'. Would that lead to the conclusion that

    a) slave drivers had not sent their best from Africa to the US (this is what your title is suggesting)

    b) that negroes are intellectualy inferior to the white man and will therefore 'bolster the sullen ranks of a permanent, growing, ethnically distinct, and highly criminalized underclass' (as you say in your article when you talk about the children of Syrian refugees)

    Let's talk about opportunity (ad b)
    - Your article completely missed the fact that immigrants who come to for instance Germany often don't speak German, are held, sometimes for years, in asylums where there is nothing else to do but pray that they are not sent back to their war ridden country, are discriminated by the native population through and through, are only good enough to do the shitty jobs, and that therefore they and their offspring have a lower chance to start with to get a fair education which could raise their IQ to levels that are above the Trobianders ('in this world' is a nice fictional documentary that touches this problem of the immigrant). This is what I missed in your article. That they 'will bolster the sullen ranks of a permanent, growing, ethnically distinct, and highly criminalized underclass' only depends if they are giving a fair chance to get an equal education as the natives have. Which leads to ad a)

    ad a) your article has not shown that they are 'not sending their best'. 'They' (whoever they are), might have sent their best, but since they did not get a fair chance to achieve a similar education as the natives, they will have less opportunity to raise their IQ to levels that are comparable with the natives.

    If you want to do something about that inequality, which I am sure you want to, you would not start your article by saying that they did not sent their best.

    I was wrong by saying that this paper should be retracted and I am sorry for having said that. It is just that if I were you, I would have retracted it, because the article highly suggests that racism is the cause for a drop in average IQ levels in countries like Germany due to immigrants. While it is actually more likely because of less opportunity given to immigrants by the natives.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anatoly Karlin

    So than in a country like Germany where 80 million people live (average IQ 100) plus 1 million refugees since the refugee ‘crisis’ started would lead to a roughly 2 point loss of IQ (exact 2.4 points)?
     
    Where exactly was it stated that all or indeed any of the IQ drop was caused by the recent refugee crisis?

    Did Germany only start accepting immigrants c.2015?

    It is stated in your title. Or so I read it.

    If you look at the comments, many did too.

    This paper is flawed. It should be retracted.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Willem
    This also doesn't help in understanding what this paper is actually about, i.e. not race, but class

    'Western Europe is a complete disaster zone, getting a harder cognitive hit even though the immigrant share of their population is considerably smaller than the US, where they constitute almost a quarter of the PISA-taking population. The German national average takes an astounding 2.4 IQ point hit due to immigrants. Moreover, there is no full convergence between first and second generation immigrants. Although one can hope the children of all those Syrian “doctors and engineers” will go on to become productive and loyal citizens, past experience suggests that they will merely bolster the sullen ranks of a permanent, growing, ethnically distinct, and highly criminalized underclass.'
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Alfa158
    Try it again Old Top: list of native IQs
    US 98.3
    Russia 98.0
    98.3 - 98.0 = 0.3 not "3 to 4"
    I know, math is hard.

    Not when the author came here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I have heard that the Lynn figures on Italy were in fact drawn from a sample of Northern Italians. In this case, their IQ estimate resembles the PISA results of 2012 for Northern Italy perfectly. Results for Italian regions were available in the 2012 round and Northern Italy came in at around 102, Central Italy at 98 and Southern Italy at 94, similar to Greece.

    besides that, many of the studies Lynn cited, had only very small sample sizes, often in the double-digits, so they can only give a rough estimation. PISA tests, even though they are not designated IQ tests, have a much bigger sample size, and I’d say if you even them out across some rounds, you’ll get pretty accurate estimates for developed countries.

    Read More
    • Replies: @M
    @Cicerone, it's the same story here.

    For 2016, the Annex B (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-results-volume-i/results-tables-immigrant-background-student-performance-and-students-attitudes-towards-science_9789264266490-table125-en;jsessionid=k37wmcvo1of9.x-oecd-live-03) drills down to scores for subregions.

    Math, Science and Reading for subregions and Science broken down into both subregions and migrant background or not.

    For Italy, for Natives and Science, you get:

    Italy Bolzano - 522
    Italy Trento - 518
    Italy Lombaria - 510
    Italy Campania - 449

    which compared with Native scores of:

    Japan - 539
    Switzerland - 527
    Spain Castile and Leon - 523
    UK England - 520
    Korea - 516
    UK Northern Ireland - 509
    UK Scotland - 498
    UK Wales - 488
    Spain Extremadura - 476
    Greece - 461
    Bulgaria - 450
    Turkey - 427

    So assuming Science is not a big outlier for these places, using a quick regression equation on Science scores against the "IQ" I worked out before ("IQ" = 6.8964+(0.18308*Science) ), that translates to a Native "IQ":

    Italy Bolzano - 102.4
    Italy Trento - 101.7
    Italy Lombaria - 100.3
    Italy Campania - 89.0

    UK England - 102.1
    UK Northern Ireland - 100.1
    UK Scotland - 98.1
    UK Wales - 96.2

    Spain Castile and Leon - 102.7
    Spain Extramadura - 94.0

    Scores based on all 3 PISA variables (if we had them) would probably wobble a point or so from that in either direction.

    The education or "IQ" gap in Italy is by far the biggest in any European nation, and along with Cypriots, Montenegrins, Romanians and Bulgarians, Southern Italians seem to be the worst participating Europeans, while Northern Italians score comparably to Northwest Europeans and almost as well as the top performing Central European natives (German and Swiss). Differences in Spain (the North vs South) and the UK (England vs the Welsh periphery) are not quite as big.

    It is a puzzle as to whether that reflects any kind of genetic difference, or it is more difference in the cultural approach and deprivation and funding. I think its hard for me to imagine its mainly a genetic difference.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ali Choudhury
    LK,

    I am not arguing for southern European migration to be banned, my point was the IQ values extrapolated here from PISA and the estimated impact on destination countries looks pretty unreliable.

    The Lynn figure of 102 for Italy IQ is 5 points higher than the 97 here. Since the bulk of Italian emigration would have been to northern Europe, how can the impact analysis here be given credence.

    Average national IQ and PISA scores are not representative for the emigrants.
    From IAB dataset most smart Italian emigrated to UK, CA and US.

    2010 Italian Emigrants with degree or higher

    %Edu Nedu Nimm Host Origin
    11.63 47940 412133 DE Italy
    29.63 106952 360987 US Italy
    35.27 113763 322591 CA Italy
    12.17 36672 301339 FR Italy
    8.97 21613 240878 CH Italy
    18.46 38726 209775 AU Italy
    37.88 44028 116245 UK Italy

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ali Choudhury
    LK,

    I am not arguing for southern European migration to be banned, my point was the IQ values extrapolated here from PISA and the estimated impact on destination countries looks pretty unreliable.

    The Lynn figure of 102 for Italy IQ is 5 points higher than the 97 here. Since the bulk of Italian emigration would have been to northern Europe, how can the impact analysis here be given credence.

    IQ values extrapolated from PISA are indeed VERY unreliable, see my previous post.

    On this we agree.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Pericles

    due to their family policies which indirectly favor highly educated people (free/cheap childcare and an environment where mothers are generally in employment seems to do the trick).

     

    I wouldn't agree that they do. The problem remains, like elsewhere, that high-IQ women spend their most fertile years in education or working rather than reproducing. In my highly educated Swedish SWPL MC/UMC surroundings, it leads to 0-2 children per couple. I think most aim for two. I don't personally know anyone my age or younger (let's say below 40) in my stratum who has had 3 children or more. In short, these policies do not seem to encourage the highly educated or intelligent to reproduce much.

    The sole effect I'm aware of is that couples tend to cluster their two children to arrive about 2 years apart, because of the way child benefits are structured. It appears you get a maximally long paid parental leave that way. (Please don't ask me to delve into the details.)

    There seems to be a commenting bug. I can see a reply to the above by Cicerone from my comments page (http://www.unz.com/comments/commenter/Pericles/) but the reply is not visible on this page.

    “In the Scandinavian countries the lower classes however don’t aim for or have more children than the highly educated.”

    I see, I would formulate that like this: Sweden (or Scandinavia) indirectly reduces the fertility of all women by having them work rather than be at home (assuming that is the cause). This would reduce the fertility of low-education women, who would be house wives, more than that of highly-ed worker bee women.

    (Another contributing factor could be the Swedish population moving from the countryside to the city.)

    You might well be right in this. Unfortunately, it should be added that we now have a large class of migrants who break this model.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @L.K
    "In any case the strongest First World results here would argue that northern European countries like finance centre Luxembourg and Switzerland would be better off banning immigration from comparatively low IQ Catholic southern Europe, which is not an especially prevalent argument I have seen online."

    This is an absolutely idiotic and false statement. First of all, those Southern Europeans that you talk about disparagingly, are very much European and Westerners, while people like you and the Salafi scum Anjem Choudhary, are NOT.

    Secondly, the differences in IQ between Northern Europe and Southern Europe are small, and Italy actually comes at the top in Europe, at 102-103.
    Although I take IQ values with a big pinch of salt, it is actually countries such as Pakistan which exhibit much lower IQ values than those in Europe, North or South.

    LK,

    I am not arguing for southern European migration to be banned, my point was the IQ values extrapolated here from PISA and the estimated impact on destination countries looks pretty unreliable.

    The Lynn figure of 102 for Italy IQ is 5 points higher than the 97 here. Since the bulk of Italian emigration would have been to northern Europe, how can the impact analysis here be given credence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @L.K
    IQ values extrapolated from PISA are indeed VERY unreliable, see my previous post.

    On this we agree.
    , @dux.ie
    Average national IQ and PISA scores are not representative for the emigrants.
    From IAB dataset most smart Italian emigrated to UK, CA and US.

    2010 Italian Emigrants with degree or higher

    %Edu Nedu Nimm Host Origin
    11.63 47940 412133 DE Italy
    29.63 106952 360987 US Italy
    35.27 113763 322591 CA Italy
    12.17 36672 301339 FR Italy
    8.97 21613 240878 CH Italy
    18.46 38726 209775 AU Italy
    37.88 44028 116245 UK Italy
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anatoly and others:

    To contribute, using the same method as I used before, here are my equivalent PISA derived “IQ” measures for 2nd Generation migrants* calculated alongside the natives

    All in sequence (sorted by magnitude)-

    With natives and 2nd gen side by side, and the gap measure (sorted by gap size) -

    Gap charted against Natives score -

    This should make clear the distinction between where the biggest gaps are against where the biggest effects are (see the table Anatoly posted up). Some places with big gaps (e.g. Brazil / Slovakia at one end and to a lesser extent Hungary at the other) see little present day immigration.

    * I used 2nd Generation to remove the effect in any 1st Generation of delayed language skills due to learning a second language. This does mean this could mute some effects from immigration changing cognitive direction somewhat.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anatoly Karlin

    PISA is not a test about cognitive ability but about learning levels achieved.
     
    1. PISA correlates very well with explicit tests of cognitive ability.

    2. People with greater cognitive ability tend to achieve higher learning levels. This is especially germane to natives vs. second gen immigrants, who have been exposed to very similar learning (nutritional, etc) environments (who in Europe do not converge).

    The successful absorption of many from poorer nations that struggle to provide adequate services (many of which do not score well on PISA) has not materially degraded the high performance levels of Canadian education.
     
    Canada has a functionally cognitively elitist immigration policy based on points.

    I mean it is practically an IQ test: http://www.canada-da.com/calculator.html

    However, Canada still dilutes its high quality immigrants with Somali refugees and so the net effect is close to zero instead of positive.

    Karlin: “PISA correlates very well with explicit tests of cognitive ability.”

    PISA scores are NOT a reliable approximation of IQ, as your absurd list of ‘native IQs converted from PISA according to calculations by commenter “m”’, shows so well.

    The racialreality blog, commented:

    But Lynn already knows the pitfalls of his approach. Finland had the highest score in Europe on the 2006 PISA tests, and using his method leads to a calculated IQ of 107, yet he reports Finns’ IQ as being just 97. Romanians’ PISA score is near the very bottom of Europe, leading to an estimate of 85, though their measured IQ is in fact 94 according to Lynn, just three points lower than that of Finns. With discrepancies like that, there’s absolutely no reason to trust his calculated IQs of around 100 and 90 for Northern and Southern Italians. Clearly, PISA scores are not a good substitute for IQ.

    Furthermore:

    Indeed, while some researchers report a strong correlation between general intelligence and educational attainment, one of Lynn’s own sources, Deary et al. (2007), addressing two of his other sources, suggests that caution should be exercised when attempting to equate the two:
    Whereas the correlations indicate that around 50% to 60% of the variance in GCSE [General Certificate of Secondary Education] examination points score can be statistically explained by the prior g [general intelligence] factor, by the same token a large proportion of the variance is not accounted for by g. Some of the remaining variance in GCSE scores will be measurement error, but some will be systematic. Thus, non-g factors have a substantial impact on educational attainment. These may include: school attendance and engagement; pupils’ personality traits, motivation and effort; the extent of parental support; and the provision of appropriate learning experiences, teaching quality, school ethos, and structure among other possible factors (Petrides, Chamorro-Premuzic, Frederickson, & Furnham, 2005; Strand, 2003).’

    Your absurd list has Argentina at 85, while Lynn himself reports Argentina’s national IQ as 96.
    His revised data( and work by Wicherts) places Italy at the top of Europe, at 102-103, but in your list, Italy is supposed to have a lower IQ than Portugal, which Lynn has reported as 91-95.
    Ireland he reports at only 87-93. Etc, etc.

    PS: not that I take these IQ values as gospel either.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ali Choudhury
    Anjem Choudhary was admitted to study medicine (tho he failed his first year courses probably because he was partying too much) and later qualified as a lawyer, studying at respectable UK universities. There is no affirmative action at UK universities and his family was rather poor, so he likely accomplished what he did academically through an above average IQ and\or conscientiousness compared to the UK average.

    In any case the strongest First World results here would argue that northern European countries like finance centre Luxembourg and Switzerland would be better off banning immigration from comparatively low IQ Catholic southern Europe, which is not an especially prevalent argument I have seen online.

    The author seems more concerned with gleefully pointing out the imported wogs and darkies are "biologically incompatible" with Western civilisation when there is little presented here to support that.

    If the OECD average shows a less than 1 point average IQ drop as a result of immigration then either

    1) the data analysis has been done incompetently
    2) immigration has had minimal discernible impact on average IQ across the OECD
    3) more detailed, granular work on immigration impact needs to be done at a county\country level than what is presented here

    “In any case the strongest First World results here would argue that northern European countries like finance centre Luxembourg and Switzerland would be better off banning immigration from comparatively low IQ Catholic southern Europe, which is not an especially prevalent argument I have seen online.”

    This is an absolutely idiotic and false statement. First of all, those Southern Europeans that you talk about disparagingly, are very much European and Westerners, while people like you and the Salafi scum Anjem Choudhary, are NOT.

    Secondly, the differences in IQ between Northern Europe and Southern Europe are small, and Italy actually comes at the top in Europe, at 102-103.
    Although I take IQ values with a big pinch of salt, it is actually countries such as Pakistan which exhibit much lower IQ values than those in Europe, North or South.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ali Choudhury
    LK,

    I am not arguing for southern European migration to be banned, my point was the IQ values extrapolated here from PISA and the estimated impact on destination countries looks pretty unreliable.

    The Lynn figure of 102 for Italy IQ is 5 points higher than the 97 here. Since the bulk of Italian emigration would have been to northern Europe, how can the impact analysis here be given credence.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Pericles

    due to their family policies which indirectly favor highly educated people (free/cheap childcare and an environment where mothers are generally in employment seems to do the trick).

     

    I wouldn't agree that they do. The problem remains, like elsewhere, that high-IQ women spend their most fertile years in education or working rather than reproducing. In my highly educated Swedish SWPL MC/UMC surroundings, it leads to 0-2 children per couple. I think most aim for two. I don't personally know anyone my age or younger (let's say below 40) in my stratum who has had 3 children or more. In short, these policies do not seem to encourage the highly educated or intelligent to reproduce much.

    The sole effect I'm aware of is that couples tend to cluster their two children to arrive about 2 years apart, because of the way child benefits are structured. It appears you get a maximally long paid parental leave that way. (Please don't ask me to delve into the details.)

    In the Scandinavian countries the lower classes however don’t aim for or have more children than the highly educated. In Sweden e.g., the lowest educated people have 2 children on average, while university educated people have 1.9. In Germany it’s 1.6 for the low educated vs. 1.3 for the university graduates.

    The diffference between the two countries (at least up until a few years ago), is that Swedish underclass women are working, while in Germany many are playing housewife. If you want to tackle underclass and immigrant fertility, bring their women into work. This will also break up traditional family patterns of immigrants, as it empowers their women.

    In the US, university graduates have 1.7 children, which is not that different from Canada. However the low educated, which also have a higher share in the US than in Canada, have 2.4, while the smaller lower class in Canada breeds 1.9 children. The interesting thing is that most of the Canadian American fertility gap can be explained by the more fertile American underclass.

    In Brazil, the lowest educated have 2.7 and the university educated have 1.2, to cite one of the very dysgenic countries (yes, this is lower than the corresponding German figure!).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @reiner Tor
    The generational IQ loss in Africa definitely seems exaggerated in Africa. I'm suspicious of any changes larger than 1 point per generation, and especially for countries with such low bases it doesn't look realistic. Can't comment on the rest.

    It definitely is exaggerated. The measure is the more accurate, the more education outcomes resemble IQ distributions. in Africa you can assume that a lot of comparably intelligent people end up getting a low education because the education systems are shitty. Those undiscovered talents of course are included in the reproduction statistics of the low educated people.

    Those IQ loss rates should be treated as the upper limit of loss, as children never perfectly in herit their parents IQ (I didn’t account for regression to the mean) and education systems are not perfect (I assumed that the smartest middle educated person is slightly less intelligent than the dumbest highly educated person, or in other words, I sliced the normal distribution of IQ according to education levels and their distribution).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jon Halpenny
    How did the Irish become so smart?

    A generation ago, the Irish were considered to be among the least intelligent people in western Europe.

    “Considered to be” – what a scientific analysis. British cartoonists in the 19th and most of the 20th century loved to depict the Irish with ape-like features. This said more about the British than the Irish, however.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • […] Muslim Invasion Destroying EU, US Overall IQ Competence Muslim Radicals In Massive Infiltration Of US Govt, Colleges Only 34,000 Of 1.2m Muslims In Germany […]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RaceRealist88
    Or people who are more prone to using their smartphones are more likely to be low IQ.

    Hey RR88,

    I’m open to all these possibilities; I just don’t see enough evidence to draw a rock-solid conclusion.

    If a nation wants to have an IQ test as a measure for letting someone in their borders – that’s their prerogative.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey Ali,

    Agreed - from my experience, it seems IQ points may start dropping even in highly developed societies wherever smartphone and other electronic distractions are being introduced into the population at too early of an age:

    http://health.usnews.com/health-news/articles/2015/03/06/could-smartphones-lower-intelligence
    https://uwaterloo.ca/stories/heavy-smartphone-use-linked-lower-intelligence

    I am hesitant in accepting this trend as a simple one-line vector from immigration.

    Peace.

    Or people who are more prone to using their smartphones are more likely to be low IQ.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey RR88,

    I'm open to all these possibilities; I just don't see enough evidence to draw a rock-solid conclusion.

    If a nation wants to have an IQ test as a measure for letting someone in their borders - that's their prerogative.

    Peace.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Rdm
    You'd be fine. Now we have a president that was unpresidented in US history.

    Beginning from George Bush era for 8 years, and tiny blip of Obama for 8 years, and now we have a better president who will make America great again, I foresee in 100 years time, the Unites States of White nations will enjoy their pastime,

    1. arguing over which reality show is the best,
    2. contemplating where to work: Burger King or McDonald's
    3. longing for the weekend where they can sit and watch from the TV where they show East Asians space-cruising planets to planets

    Of course, War for Blair Mountain occasionally comes and chimes in his thought on immigration.


    Don't believe me? Watch the UK, the once mighty country kneeling over President Xi and playing ping pong with Li Keqiang.

    Highly amusing comment. Well, we in China have our own issues such as pollution but I do think we’ll accomplish quite a bit especially on the space travel front. Long March 5 went well pretty, all in all. Now we just need to make sure that more than 20% of China reaches a reasonable GDP per capita.

    War for Blair Mountain is great entertainment for me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ali Choudhury
    Islam spread quickly because the Byzantine Empire and the Persian Sassanid dynasty had bled each other dry in the prior decades and were exhausted. I doubt either empire could be described as being mostly peaceful\Christian\pagan etc.

    Also – they stupidly went out to meet the Muslim armies in pitched battle in open plains instead of tiring them out in siege warfare, of which the Arabs had little knowledge. They left their capitals with paltry garrisons which surrendered on demand. Out in pitched battle, they exposed themselves to what Prof. Mark W. Graham termed the “magnificent brutality” of the conquering Muslim armies. In the game of thrones you get to make those mistakes once or twice at best.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ali Choudhury
    Anjem Choudhary was admitted to study medicine (tho he failed his first year courses probably because he was partying too much) and later qualified as a lawyer, studying at respectable UK universities. There is no affirmative action at UK universities and his family was rather poor, so he likely accomplished what he did academically through an above average IQ and\or conscientiousness compared to the UK average.

    In any case the strongest First World results here would argue that northern European countries like finance centre Luxembourg and Switzerland would be better off banning immigration from comparatively low IQ Catholic southern Europe, which is not an especially prevalent argument I have seen online.

    The author seems more concerned with gleefully pointing out the imported wogs and darkies are "biologically incompatible" with Western civilisation when there is little presented here to support that.

    If the OECD average shows a less than 1 point average IQ drop as a result of immigration then either

    1) the data analysis has been done incompetently
    2) immigration has had minimal discernible impact on average IQ across the OECD
    3) more detailed, granular work on immigration impact needs to be done at a county\country level than what is presented here

    Hey Ali,

    Agreed – from my experience, it seems IQ points may start dropping even in highly developed societies wherever smartphone and other electronic distractions are being introduced into the population at too early of an age:

    http://health.usnews.com/health-news/articles/2015/03/06/could-smartphones-lower-intelligence

    https://uwaterloo.ca/stories/heavy-smartphone-use-linked-lower-intelligence

    I am hesitant in accepting this trend as a simple one-line vector from immigration.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RaceRealist88
    Or people who are more prone to using their smartphones are more likely to be low IQ.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ali Choudhury
    Islam spread quickly because the Byzantine Empire and the Persian Sassanid dynasty had bled each other dry in the prior decades and were exhausted. I doubt either empire could be described as being mostly peaceful\Christian\pagan etc.

    Hey Ali,

    Yeah – if one made the comment to the Sassanids that they were a bunch of peaceful pushovers, they might have one of their Hazar Mard tear off your head and piss down your throat.

    The Byzantines might have blinded you and pulled out your tongue first before doing the same.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anjem Choudhary was admitted to study medicine (tho he failed his first year courses probably because he was partying too much) and later qualified as a lawyer, studying at respectable UK universities. There is no affirmative action at UK universities and his family was rather poor, so he likely accomplished what he did academically through an above average IQ and\or conscientiousness compared to the UK average.

    In any case the strongest First World results here would argue that northern European countries like finance centre Luxembourg and Switzerland would be better off banning immigration from comparatively low IQ Catholic southern Europe, which is not an especially prevalent argument I have seen online.

    The author seems more concerned with gleefully pointing out the imported wogs and darkies are “biologically incompatible” with Western civilisation when there is little presented here to support that.

    If the OECD average shows a less than 1 point average IQ drop as a result of immigration then either

    1) the data analysis has been done incompetently
    2) immigration has had minimal discernible impact on average IQ across the OECD
    3) more detailed, granular work on immigration impact needs to be done at a county\country level than what is presented here

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Ali,

    Agreed - from my experience, it seems IQ points may start dropping even in highly developed societies wherever smartphone and other electronic distractions are being introduced into the population at too early of an age:

    http://health.usnews.com/health-news/articles/2015/03/06/could-smartphones-lower-intelligence
    https://uwaterloo.ca/stories/heavy-smartphone-use-linked-lower-intelligence

    I am hesitant in accepting this trend as a simple one-line vector from immigration.

    Peace.

    , @L.K
    "In any case the strongest First World results here would argue that northern European countries like finance centre Luxembourg and Switzerland would be better off banning immigration from comparatively low IQ Catholic southern Europe, which is not an especially prevalent argument I have seen online."

    This is an absolutely idiotic and false statement. First of all, those Southern Europeans that you talk about disparagingly, are very much European and Westerners, while people like you and the Salafi scum Anjem Choudhary, are NOT.

    Secondly, the differences in IQ between Northern Europe and Southern Europe are small, and Italy actually comes at the top in Europe, at 102-103.
    Although I take IQ values with a big pinch of salt, it is actually countries such as Pakistan which exhibit much lower IQ values than those in Europe, North or South.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Greg S.
    Excellent comment. People are very ignorant of the actual history of Islam, because it's too "controversial" to share, but if one digs into it he finds that the major tenet of Islam throughout the centuries was to dominate, convert, and subjugate by force all other peoples.

    So essentially, low IQ Muslims took over both literally and genetically as they spread out of the deserts. They were up against mostly peaceful Christians, pagans, zororasts, Buddhists, etc who were no match.

    So you have to consider the pre-muslim and post-muslim genetic makeup of a country. Take Turkey: today it is 99% Muslim, but it used to be the heart of a Christian empire once, with almost no Muslims. Once you understand exactly how Turkey went from 0% to 99% Muslim, you will truly understand Islam.

    Islam spread quickly because the Byzantine Empire and the Persian Sassanid dynasty had bled each other dry in the prior decades and were exhausted. I doubt either empire could be described as being mostly peaceful\Christian\pagan etc.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Ali,

    Yeah - if one made the comment to the Sassanids that they were a bunch of peaceful pushovers, they might have one of their Hazar Mard tear off your head and piss down your throat.

    The Byzantines might have blinded you and pulled out your tongue first before doing the same.

    Peace.
    , @Talha
    Also - they stupidly went out to meet the Muslim armies in pitched battle in open plains instead of tiring them out in siege warfare, of which the Arabs had little knowledge. They left their capitals with paltry garrisons which surrendered on demand. Out in pitched battle, they exposed themselves to what Prof. Mark W. Graham termed the "magnificent brutality" of the conquering Muslim armies. In the game of thrones you get to make those mistakes once or twice at best.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Alden
    Why are you so angry and agressive? From your posts I can diagnose you with diabetes. The medical books call it volatility and mood swings. Observers call it looking for a fight and not stopping till you goad someone into a fight

    Take your insulin and follow your diet. And don't get into a road rage incident or parking lot fight as is the habit of out of control diabetics.

    Can I get a second opinion on this – my diabetes, or you are such an expert that I shouldn’t bother. No, you are right, I might have overreacted and I am sorry about it. I still don’t think that your responses were well thought through, but it still didn’t warrant such a harsh response. Anyway, anybody has the right to be wrong, we are all trying to learn something here and hopefully to correct each other when we are wrong, provided the other person can see the light of the argument. I hope I didn’t cause you any emotional trauma with my comments. Take care.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cyrano
    You got it man. Another example - US without the nuclear weapons and how much they influenced the outcome of the WW2 against Japan and how it transformed them into superpower which without those weapons they would have never be able to become to the extent that they became and why they would never give up on those nuclear weapons. Clearly technological advantage doesn't play any role in history. Do me a favor, will you? Don't respond to my comments anymore, you don't have the intelligence to discuss anything with me.

    Well, I guess it’s better that you take out your grumpiness and rage on Internet arguments instead of getting into physical fights with everyone you encounter.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cyrano
    One thing that I don't need is someone like you to teach me history. Do you even have any clue that you are contradicting yourself? Claiming that Turks used raids and acknowledging the sieges of Constantinople and Vienna at the same time. Doesn't it appear to you that siege and raid are two different things? And who said that those sieges were done by the Mongols? Go take a nap, partner. You seem little bit confused.

    Why are you so angry and agressive? From your posts I can diagnose you with diabetes. The medical books call it volatility and mood swings. Observers call it looking for a fight and not stopping till you goad someone into a fight

    Take your insulin and follow your diet. And don’t get into a road rage incident or parking lot fight as is the habit of out of control diabetics.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cyrano
    Can I get a second opinion on this - my diabetes, or you are such an expert that I shouldn't bother. No, you are right, I might have overreacted and I am sorry about it. I still don't think that your responses were well thought through, but it still didn't warrant such a harsh response. Anyway, anybody has the right to be wrong, we are all trying to learn something here and hopefully to correct each other when we are wrong, provided the other person can see the light of the argument. I hope I didn't cause you any emotional trauma with my comments. Take care.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Juggernaut_is_here
    Dear AKarlin Sir,
    If Central Asians are so IQ disadvantaged, then how come they managed to subjugate Russians in the Middle Ages? or were Russians only subjugated by the Mongols who tend to be at 100? I wonder what level of IQ did the Huns have as they managed to raze through Western Europe also

    Look at a map. Mongolia is in Eastern Asia

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @War for Blair Mountain
    Anatoly


    I d0n't want to legally import high IQ nonwhite Legal Immigrants into the US......for I d0n't want Asians in the Nati0n of my ancestors voting my Racial Tribe into a racial minority. In fact, I want the mass expulsion of all TATA Institute Grads out of America.

    You’d be fine. Now we have a president that was unpresidented in US history.

    Beginning from George Bush era for 8 years, and tiny blip of Obama for 8 years, and now we have a better president who will make America great again, I foresee in 100 years time, the Unites States of White nations will enjoy their pastime,

    1. arguing over which reality show is the best,
    2. contemplating where to work: Burger King or McDonald’s
    3. longing for the weekend where they can sit and watch from the TV where they show East Asians space-cruising planets to planets

    Of course, War for Blair Mountain occasionally comes and chimes in his thought on immigration.

    Don’t believe me? Watch the UK, the once mighty country kneeling over President Xi and playing ping pong with Li Keqiang.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Highly amusing comment. Well, we in China have our own issues such as pollution but I do think we'll accomplish quite a bit especially on the space travel front. Long March 5 went well pretty, all in all. Now we just need to make sure that more than 20% of China reaches a reasonable GDP per capita.

    War for Blair Mountain is great entertainment for me.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Alden
    The conquest of Constantinople and the numerous sieges of Vienna were done by Turks, not Mongolians completely different ethnic groups.
    Those sieges occurred centuries after the Tatar Mongolians conquered Russia.
    It's just rude that your reply to me was so agressive and arrogant The least you could do is to consult the 4th grade level Wikepedia about the difference between Mongolians and Turks
    It was a Persian Muslim immigrant, a history prof back in Persia who explained to me how the raid and run strategy of the Turks was so successful

    One thing that I don’t need is someone like you to teach me history. Do you even have any clue that you are contradicting yourself? Claiming that Turks used raids and acknowledging the sieges of Constantinople and Vienna at the same time. Doesn’t it appear to you that siege and raid are two different things? And who said that those sieges were done by the Mongols? Go take a nap, partner. You seem little bit confused.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Why are you so angry and agressive? From your posts I can diagnose you with diabetes. The medical books call it volatility and mood swings. Observers call it looking for a fight and not stopping till you goad someone into a fight

    Take your insulin and follow your diet. And don't get into a road rage incident or parking lot fight as is the habit of out of control diabetics.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RaceRealist88
    "You have to understand, but i know it’s impossible in your level, that you don’t understand enough what you believe you know, period."

    My friend, I literally handle peoples's nutrition and I know what different micros and macros do in the body.

    "http://karlasantone.com.br/derrubando-o-mito-das-proteinas-conheca-os-5-mitos-mais-comuns/"

    "Many people do not know how much protein they need or how much they are getting"

    Right.

    "vegetables, whole grains and legumes are excellent sources of protein without the health risks from meat and other animal products"

    There are no 'health risks' from eating animal products. The one study that came out saying that red meat causes cancer, specifically red meat cooked over charcoal briquettes. I believe the increase in cancer was like 5 percent, I haven't read the study in a while. But what the stupid news articles didn't say was that the increase in cancer was extremely negligible.

    One more thing, most plant proteins are incomplete proteins and you need to combine some plant proteins to make complete proteins. The average person doesn't know how to supplement their diet correctly.

    "One study found that those who consume more animal protein increased their risk of diabetes by 22%. Excessive protein intake is also associated with osteoporosis, cancer, kidney failure and heart disease."

    No it doesn't.

    http://www.zoeharcombe.com/2014/03/animal-protein-as-bad-as-smoking/

    "Someone who weighs 70 pounds only needs 56 grams of protein a day. The recommended amount (RDA) of protein for the average adult is 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight."

    Does this person go to the gym or not? Protein recommendations depend on whether or not the person is a gym-goer.

    "Carbohydrates are the body's primary source of energy and should occupy most of your plate"

    LOL do you understand how horribly wrong this is?

    Carbohydrates spike insulin the most. Insulin inhibits the breakdown of fat in the adipose tissue by inhibiting the lipase that hydrolyzes (the chemical breakdown of a compound due to a reaction with water) the fat out of the cell. Since insulin facilitates the entry of glucose into the cell, when this occurs, the glucose is synthesized into glycerol. Along with the fatty acids in the liver, they both are synthesized into triglycerides in the liver. Due to these mechanisms, insulin is directly involved with the shuttling of more fat into the adipocyte. Since insulin has this effect on fat metabolism in the body, it has a fat-sparing effect. Insulin drives most cells to prefer carbohydrates for energy. Putting it all together, insulin indirectly stimulates the accumulation of fat into the adipose tissue.

    http://arbl.cvmbs.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/endocrine/pancreas/insulin_phys.html

    "Truth: There is no need to plan meals around complementary proteins . In 2009, the "Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics" (AND) released an article stating that eating a variety of plant foods throughout the day provides all the necessary amino acids. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention agrees with the DNA and discredits the rumor that humans need to eat certain proteins together to receive proper nutrition."

    Ummmm if you eat two incomplete proteins that don't make a complete protein, you're not getting the correct amount of amino acids.

    "Excess calorie protein will not magically turn into muscle. To lose weight in a healthy way, it is important to have a balanced diet with a focus on all the necessary nutrients. Instead of following the fad of proteins, many people could benefit by finding ways to incorporate plant sources of protein into their meals."

    Protein-rich diets keep you sated longer and staves off muscle catabolism while you're in a caloric deficit. Protein needs to be high during a caloric deficit.

    There are no problems with high-protein diets if the individual is healthy.

    "SOOOURCE*"

    https://www.muscleforlife.com/9-ways-to-naturally-boost-your-testosterone-production/

    "causation or causality**"

    Fats from meat raise testsoterone.

    "”bacterias ARE SUPERIOR than humans” (… in this aspect)"

    You don't understand what I'm saying.

    Evolution is NOT progressive since bacteria is the MODE. Bacteria hasn't changed in 3.8 billion years. Do some reading bro.

    http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_bacteria.html

    Half of all of the biomass on earth is bacteria. Muh anthropometric superiority.

    "You have a poorer ”moral theory of mind”, aka, empathy, you simply no have it well developed."

    Yeaaaaa you don't know what you're talking about.

    "number-level of testosterone before and after."


    The mean ± SD of testosterone was 411 ± 175.82 ng/dL (range 198 to 872 ng/dL) at the start of therapy, 393 ± 194.24 ng/dL (range 182 to 759 ng/dL) at day 28, and 438 ± 95.46 ng/dL (range 263 to 587 ng/dL) at day 42, 2 weeks after treatment was discontinued (Fig. 1 )
     
    http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/16/4/829?ijkey=8b39ea992a903f976c44216459b8e251e3baa8d1&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha#F1

    Good for you!! What all the vegetarians and bogus nutritionists don’t know is that ALL carbs, including organic fruits and vegetables, whole grain bread, brown rice quinona and ALL the carbs they recommend are turned into glucose in the GI tract and enter the blood stream as glucose.
    Glucose is glucose whether it comes from a tablespoon of White sugar or a tablespoon of health food store organic brown rice.

    High carb diets lead to obesity and diabetes. High protein diets lead to slenderness and health.

    How did diet superstitions get into this discussion?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @J Henry
    " despite its population being more than twice lower than Russia’s."

    What, exactly, is this number? Do you mean "less than half?" If so say so. Quit this ignorant comparison protocol that shows a complete lack of understanding of the language. This includes all of you who refer to such nonsense as "three times less." IT IS "ONE THIRD OF..." you ninnies.

    It’s not a bad workaround for someone whose English is a bit patchy. Better than some of the careless ambiguities and non sequiturs that litter the threads.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Juggernaut_is_here
    Dear AKarlin Sir,
    If Central Asians are so IQ disadvantaged, then how come they managed to subjugate Russians in the Middle Ages? or were Russians only subjugated by the Mongols who tend to be at 100? I wonder what level of IQ did the Huns have as they managed to raze through Western Europe also

    The Huns lost and were turned back to Central Asia. Photius. Com has the average Mongolian IQ as 101 fairly high, higher than most countries. The Huns never conquered Europe. Where did you learn your history?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cyrano
    I don't think you have a full grasp of the issue, pal. It's not the question of whether the Europeans knew about the stirrups and whether they were using them, the issue is how they were using them. And they were using them just to get on the horse and that was it. The Mongols were using them throughout the battle, to stand up and get a better shot. Your theory about the military tactics of the Turks is bull too. Read about the sieges of Constantinople and Vienna. I don't see any "raids" there, just classic sieges.

    The conquest of Constantinople and the numerous sieges of Vienna were done by Turks, not Mongolians completely different ethnic groups.
    Those sieges occurred centuries after the Tatar Mongolians conquered Russia.
    It’s just rude that your reply to me was so agressive and arrogant The least you could do is to consult the 4th grade level Wikepedia about the difference between Mongolians and Turks
    It was a Persian Muslim immigrant, a history prof back in Persia who explained to me how the raid and run strategy of the Turks was so successful

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cyrano
    One thing that I don't need is someone like you to teach me history. Do you even have any clue that you are contradicting yourself? Claiming that Turks used raids and acknowledging the sieges of Constantinople and Vienna at the same time. Doesn't it appear to you that siege and raid are two different things? And who said that those sieges were done by the Mongols? Go take a nap, partner. You seem little bit confused.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @JerseyJeffersonian
    Cyrano,

    You are incorrect concerning the use of stirrups in the West.

    http://m.thelatinlibrary.com/imperialism/notes/tours.html

    Read this account of the conflicts between the Iberian Moors and the Franks under Charles Martel in the mid-700s, specifically the section "Aftermath", in which the Frankish innovation (or adoption) of stirrups is discussed that permitted them to field HEAVY CAVALRY to supplement their fearsome infantry, and gradually drive the Moors back beyond the Pyrenees.

    The 700s, note. This does not discount other tactical innovations by the later Mongols, but let's get this misapprehension about the Mongol INVENTION of the stirrup sorted out, shall we? Parallel evolution is nothing new, I hope you will acknowledge.

    Regards,
    JJ

    My reading was that the Scythians invented the stirrup at around the time of the end of the Western Roman Empire. Prior to that there had been toe loops sometimes used only to help the rider get into the saddle. Stirrups are one of those inventions that seem so obvious that you can’t imagine why they weren’t invented almost immediately. People routinely rode on horseback for roughly 1000 years before stirrups were developed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • ” despite its population being more than twice lower than Russia’s.”

    What, exactly, is this number? Do you mean “less than half?” If so say so. Quit this ignorant comparison protocol that shows a complete lack of understanding of the language. This includes all of you who refer to such nonsense as “three times less.” IT IS “ONE THIRD OF…” you ninnies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    It's not a bad workaround for someone whose English is a bit patchy. Better than some of the careless ambiguities and non sequiturs that litter the threads.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @JerseyJeffersonian
    Cyrano,

    You are incorrect concerning the use of stirrups in the West.

    http://m.thelatinlibrary.com/imperialism/notes/tours.html

    Read this account of the conflicts between the Iberian Moors and the Franks under Charles Martel in the mid-700s, specifically the section "Aftermath", in which the Frankish innovation (or adoption) of stirrups is discussed that permitted them to field HEAVY CAVALRY to supplement their fearsome infantry, and gradually drive the Moors back beyond the Pyrenees.

    The 700s, note. This does not discount other tactical innovations by the later Mongols, but let's get this misapprehension about the Mongol INVENTION of the stirrup sorted out, shall we? Parallel evolution is nothing new, I hope you will acknowledge.

    Regards,
    JJ

    Welcome to the club. The club which misses the point, that is. How about you read this instead:

    http://bigera5.weebly.com/the-mongolian-stirrup

    Btw, the point that you missed, along with everyone else is: It’s not important who invented the stirrups, but who was able to find a better use for them than anyone else. Inventing something doesn’t mean that you’ll be the best at it forever. Take example with the tank, the Brits invented it in WW1, but the best use for it was found by the Germans in WW2.

    Thus saying that the Germans could not draw tactical advantage by using the tank because it’s the British who invented it doesn’t make any sense. Do you understand now? And enough already about the stupid stirrups.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Willem
    So what does this map show?

    A. Only smart people do not emigrate from war ridden countries
    B. The whole world (Qatar and countries that were not included in this study, excluded) became more stupid after the immigration 'crisis' started
    C. IQ is unevenly distributed. People who fled from war ridden countries are on average more stupid than those who live in countries that instigate wars.
    D. This article reports a study that is reporting bullshit.

    I did not read the methodology from the reported study, but the other options are too ludicrous to me.

    I mean: suppose option C is true. So than in a country like Germany where 80 million people live (average IQ 100) plus 1 million refugees since the refugee 'crisis' started would lead to a roughly 2 point loss of IQ (exact 2.4 points)?

    Than the average IQ of these refugees must have been: IQ=-((98x81)-(80x100))=62

    That would mean that the average refugee in Germany is mentially challenged (see: http://www.free-iqtest.net/iq-score-guide.asp), which I fail to believe (actually it pains my mind, and I find it an utter disgrace that people want me to believe this ludicrous report)

    So I opt for D, because 'It pays to keep an open mind, but no so open that your brains fall out' (Carl Sagan)

    So than in a country like Germany where 80 million people live (average IQ 100) plus 1 million refugees since the refugee ‘crisis’ started would lead to a roughly 2 point loss of IQ (exact 2.4 points)?

    Where exactly was it stated that all or indeed any of the IQ drop was caused by the recent refugee crisis?

    Did Germany only start accepting immigrants c.2015?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Willem
    It is stated in your title. Or so I read it.

    If you look at the comments, many did too.

    This paper is flawed. It should be retracted.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Declining IQs are more likely due to cultural stuff……like excessive breeding by morons, listening to rap music, and watching TalmudVision.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @War for Blair Mountain
    Two more retards of Irish ancestry:1)Fields Medal Winner Curtis McMullen....phd under Irish retard Dennis Sullivan.....2)Fields Medal winner...the retard Daniel Quillen....

    Did they have Viking genes?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @polistra
    It works both ways.

    Universal rule: Migrants are misfits.

    They leave because they are, or feel, unsuccessful in their native country.

    In an agricultural country where physical strength and stamina lead to success, misfits will probably have higher IQ than the successful natives, and will move to a place where they think their higher IQ will be valued.

    In a high-tech country where raw IQ leads to success, misfits probably have lower IQ, and will tend to move to a place where physical strength is more important.

    The net result is to steepen the IQ gradient between the agricultural and tech countries.

    How about “in an agricultural country here ownership of [enough] land leads to success”????

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Santoculto
    You have to understand, but i know it's impossible in your level, that you don't understand enough what you believe you know, period.

    http://karlasantone.com.br/derrubando-o-mito-das-proteinas-conheca-os-5-mitos-mais-comuns/

    Western ''diet'', specially in this days is EXCESSIVE.

    Only a long term study will satisfatorily to prove if soy really cause testosterone shrinking, and specially without previous artificial increase of testosterone caused by habitual excessive ''meat'' consume.


    Men who eat more meat have higher levels of testosterone than men who don’t eat meat
     
    SOOOURCE*

    causation or causality**

    I will not go to comment more in the progressively trashy PP blog (worse and worse with that ape and other trashy subhumans as you) AND i will not go more to ''debate'' with a mentally challenged insect as you, the last time of all.

    You're just like a gymnast who think that is gifted and start to training difficult exercises BUT you can't do it, so instead you improved your performance you worsened it.

    Translating to this context

    You think you're a super-thinker and you push hard for yourself many intellectual challenges BUT you can't do it, so instead you improved your own performance you foolish yourself all the time and without a fu...ing pale awareness.

    I already catch everything about you

    You don't give a miserable f..ck to the non-human animal rights to have a minimally decent life,
    everybody choice to live this torment call life in their own way and you ''choice'' the prole mode, sculpting your muscles above a non-human animal 'holocaust'',

    you think i'm the guy who use ad hoc ''rationalizations'' of course because you only use your mirror to see your muscular as.

    but it's you who try to JUSTIFY your lack of any compassion, so instead you be ''direct, straight, honest''

    just like that

    ''yes, i don't give a shutz to the non-human animal well being...''

    you try justify via ad hoc why you can be a asshole and a kind person in the same time. NO.

    You're a hopeless contradictory person who have a 88, nazi symbol in your own nickname, a blog with a bell curve and a comparative (both artificially manipulated) image of three women of the most important macro-races, but you internalize a lot of ''blank slate'' pre-conceptions and use academic-common sense proto-arguments, or appeal to the ''authority'' ( Razib agree with me) or just quoted other people, without google you no had any chance to remain live in most of debates you have participated.

    Surprisling you're still a coward cuck or a miserable italian-american who don't know where you're going on. You have fear about some comments in PP blog, pathetic.


    I already showed for you where or how you're shockling contradictory

    a example

    ''no there such thing superior or inferior in evolution........ bacterias represented important part of earth ground''

    translating to the good listener

    ''bacterias ARE SUPERIOR than humans'' (... in this aspect)

    Typical from a average joey to contradict itself without take note about it = fooling yourself.


    ''Had a particularly large brain.''

    They were geniuses...


    This type of debate, a moral issue, is IMPOSSIBLY understandable by a kind of people as you.

    It's not the same language, no doubt about it, waste of time.

    You have a poorer ''moral theory of mind'', aka, empathy, you simply no have it well developed.

    But i have.

    ''Decreased testosterone 19%.''

    number-level of testosterone before and after.

    my last words for you...

    “You have to understand, but i know it’s impossible in your level, that you don’t understand enough what you believe you know, period.”

    My friend, I literally handle peoples’s nutrition and I know what different micros and macros do in the body.

    http://karlasantone.com.br/derrubando-o-mito-das-proteinas-conheca-os-5-mitos-mais-comuns/”

    “Many people do not know how much protein they need or how much they are getting”

    Right.

    “vegetables, whole grains and legumes are excellent sources of protein without the health risks from meat and other animal products”

    There are no ‘health risks’ from eating animal products. The one study that came out saying that red meat causes cancer, specifically red meat cooked over charcoal briquettes. I believe the increase in cancer was like 5 percent, I haven’t read the study in a while. But what the stupid news articles didn’t say was that the increase in cancer was extremely negligible.

    One more thing, most plant proteins are incomplete proteins and you need to combine some plant proteins to make complete proteins. The average person doesn’t know how to supplement their diet correctly.

    “One study found that those who consume more animal protein increased their risk of diabetes by 22%. Excessive protein intake is also associated with osteoporosis, cancer, kidney failure and heart disease.”

    No it doesn’t.

    http://www.zoeharcombe.com/2014/03/animal-protein-as-bad-as-smoking/

    “Someone who weighs 70 pounds only needs 56 grams of protein a day. The recommended amount (RDA) of protein for the average adult is 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight.”

    Does this person go to the gym or not? Protein recommendations depend on whether or not the person is a gym-goer.

    “Carbohydrates are the body’s primary source of energy and should occupy most of your plate”

    LOL do you understand how horribly wrong this is?

    Carbohydrates spike insulin the most. Insulin inhibits the breakdown of fat in the adipose tissue by inhibiting the lipase that hydrolyzes (the chemical breakdown of a compound due to a reaction with water) the fat out of the cell. Since insulin facilitates the entry of glucose into the cell, when this occurs, the glucose is synthesized into glycerol. Along with the fatty acids in the liver, they both are synthesized into triglycerides in the liver. Due to these mechanisms, insulin is directly involved with the shuttling of more fat into the adipocyte. Since insulin has this effect on fat metabolism in the body, it has a fat-sparing effect. Insulin drives most cells to prefer carbohydrates for energy. Putting it all together, insulin indirectly stimulates the accumulation of fat into the adipose tissue.

    http://arbl.cvmbs.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/endocrine/pancreas/insulin_phys.html

    “Truth: There is no need to plan meals around complementary proteins . In 2009, the “Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics” (AND) released an article stating that eating a variety of plant foods throughout the day provides all the necessary amino acids. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention agrees with the DNA and discredits the rumor that humans need to eat certain proteins together to receive proper nutrition.”

    Ummmm if you eat two incomplete proteins that don’t make a complete protein, you’re not getting the correct amount of amino acids.

    “Excess calorie protein will not magically turn into muscle. To lose weight in a healthy way, it is important to have a balanced diet with a focus on all the necessary nutrients. Instead of following the fad of proteins, many people could benefit by finding ways to incorporate plant sources of protein into their meals.”

    Protein-rich diets keep you sated longer and staves off muscle catabolism while you’re in a caloric deficit. Protein needs to be high during a caloric deficit.

    There are no problems with high-protein diets if the individual is healthy.

    “SOOOURCE*”

    https://www.muscleforlife.com/9-ways-to-naturally-boost-your-testosterone-production/

    “causation or causality**

    Fats from meat raise testsoterone.

    “”bacterias ARE SUPERIOR than humans” (… in this aspect)”

    You don’t understand what I’m saying.

    Evolution is NOT progressive since bacteria is the MODE. Bacteria hasn’t changed in 3.8 billion years. Do some reading bro.

    http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_bacteria.html

    Half of all of the biomass on earth is bacteria. Muh anthropometric superiority.

    “You have a poorer ”moral theory of mind”, aka, empathy, you simply no have it well developed.”

    Yeaaaaa you don’t know what you’re talking about.

    “number-level of testosterone before and after.”

    The mean ± SD of testosterone was 411 ± 175.82 ng/dL (range 198 to 872 ng/dL) at the start of therapy, 393 ± 194.24 ng/dL (range 182 to 759 ng/dL) at day 28, and 438 ± 95.46 ng/dL (range 263 to 587 ng/dL) at day 42, 2 weeks after treatment was discontinued (Fig. 1 )

    http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/16/4/829?ijkey=8b39ea992a903f976c44216459b8e251e3baa8d1&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha#F1

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Good for you!! What all the vegetarians and bogus nutritionists don't know is that ALL carbs, including organic fruits and vegetables, whole grain bread, brown rice quinona and ALL the carbs they recommend are turned into glucose in the GI tract and enter the blood stream as glucose.
    Glucose is glucose whether it comes from a tablespoon of White sugar or a tablespoon of health food store organic brown rice.

    High carb diets lead to obesity and diabetes. High protein diets lead to slenderness and health.

    How did diet superstitions get into this discussion?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The need for any future immigration needs more serious thought and discussion in the US. I believe that if put to a vote, most people would opt to end it altogether. We have 20% unemployment, and everything is becoming more automated and mechanized. What happens when all these third worlders are displaced by driverless cars? We have a hard enough time finding productive and rewarding things for our own citizens to do. The immigration concept is outdated and it’s been nothing but a ripoff and headache for the vast majority of US citizens for decades. Today it’s a pet project for do-gooders who never feel its negative effects, corporate America skinflints, and weaselly politicians hoping to import voters. How any of these things are good for our nation is beyond me. I hope Trump will be inclined to do something about this unwanted invasion beyond comments about ‘vetting.’ How about ‘ending.’

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Actually, I made a mistake in my calculations. If the IQ dropped in Germany by 2 points due to the immigration ‘crisis’, refugees must have an average IQ of -62

    I rest my case

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • So what does this map show?

    A. Only smart people do not emigrate from war ridden countries
    B. The whole world (Qatar and countries that were not included in this study, excluded) became more stupid after the immigration ‘crisis’ started
    C. IQ is unevenly distributed. People who fled from war ridden countries are on average more stupid than those who live in countries that instigate wars.
    D. This article reports a study that is reporting bullshit.

    I did not read the methodology from the reported study, but the other options are too ludicrous to me.

    I mean: suppose option C is true. So than in a country like Germany where 80 million people live (average IQ 100) plus 1 million refugees since the refugee ‘crisis’ started would lead to a roughly 2 point loss of IQ (exact 2.4 points)?

    Than the average IQ of these refugees must have been: IQ=-((98×81)-(80×100))=62

    That would mean that the average refugee in Germany is mentially challenged (see: http://www.free-iqtest.net/iq-score-guide.asp), which I fail to believe (actually it pains my mind, and I find it an utter disgrace that people want me to believe this ludicrous report)

    So I opt for D, because ‘It pays to keep an open mind, but no so open that your brains fall out’ (Carl Sagan)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    So than in a country like Germany where 80 million people live (average IQ 100) plus 1 million refugees since the refugee ‘crisis’ started would lead to a roughly 2 point loss of IQ (exact 2.4 points)?
     
    Where exactly was it stated that all or indeed any of the IQ drop was caused by the recent refugee crisis?

    Did Germany only start accepting immigrants c.2015?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cicerone
    If you go by homemade IQ drop (due to fertility differences, aka dysgenics), then Latin America takes the prize while the Scandinavian countries hardly experience dysgenic fertility at all due to their family policies which indirectly favor highly educated people (free/cheap childcare and an environment where mothers are generally in employment seems to do the trick). The problem however is that their non-dysgenic fertility gets dysgenic nevertheless due to immigration.

    The most favorable conditions seem to be in Canada (selective migration paired with non-dysgenic fertility) and Japan (almost no immigration coupled with only lightly dysgenic trend). Of the developed countries, the US (comparably high dysgenic fertility) and Central Europe are fucked.

    https://farm1.staticflickr.com/746/21683005190_eb722fb3c1_o.png

    due to their family policies which indirectly favor highly educated people (free/cheap childcare and an environment where mothers are generally in employment seems to do the trick).

    I wouldn’t agree that they do. The problem remains, like elsewhere, that high-IQ women spend their most fertile years in education or working rather than reproducing. In my highly educated Swedish SWPL MC/UMC surroundings, it leads to 0-2 children per couple. I think most aim for two. I don’t personally know anyone my age or younger (let’s say below 40) in my stratum who has had 3 children or more. In short, these policies do not seem to encourage the highly educated or intelligent to reproduce much.

    The sole effect I’m aware of is that couples tend to cluster their two children to arrive about 2 years apart, because of the way child benefits are structured. It appears you get a maximally long paid parental leave that way. (Please don’t ask me to delve into the details.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cicerone
    In the Scandinavian countries the lower classes however don't aim for or have more children than the highly educated. In Sweden e.g., the lowest educated people have 2 children on average, while university educated people have 1.9. In Germany it's 1.6 for the low educated vs. 1.3 for the university graduates.

    The diffference between the two countries (at least up until a few years ago), is that Swedish underclass women are working, while in Germany many are playing housewife. If you want to tackle underclass and immigrant fertility, bring their women into work. This will also break up traditional family patterns of immigrants, as it empowers their women.

    In the US, university graduates have 1.7 children, which is not that different from Canada. However the low educated, which also have a higher share in the US than in Canada, have 2.4, while the smaller lower class in Canada breeds 1.9 children. The interesting thing is that most of the Canadian American fertility gap can be explained by the more fertile American underclass.

    In Brazil, the lowest educated have 2.7 and the university educated have 1.2, to cite one of the very dysgenic countries (yes, this is lower than the corresponding German figure!).

    , @Pericles
    There seems to be a commenting bug. I can see a reply to the above by Cicerone from my comments page (http://www.unz.com/comments/commenter/Pericles/) but the reply is not visible on this page.

    "In the Scandinavian countries the lower classes however don't aim for or have more children than the highly educated."

    I see, I would formulate that like this: Sweden (or Scandinavia) indirectly reduces the fertility of all women by having them work rather than be at home (assuming that is the cause). This would reduce the fertility of low-education women, who would be house wives, more than that of highly-ed worker bee women.

    (Another contributing factor could be the Swedish population moving from the countryside to the city.)

    You might well be right in this. Unfortunately, it should be added that we now have a large class of migrants who break this model.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cyrano

    Your teacher was wrong. Stirrups long predated the Mongols and had spread throughout all of Europe by the close of the first millennium.
     
    I don't think he was:

    http://www.nysedregents.org/globalhistorygeography/613/glhg62013-rg2w.pdf

    Read page 3.


    Bombards were in heavy use in Europe from the 14th century. The guy who built the big guns used in the taking of Constantinople was a Hungarian (ironically, his name was Orban).
     
    It doesn't matter who build it, it matters who commissioned him to build it - the Turks.

    http://www.guns.com/2012/01/04/guns-that-changed-history-the-great-turkish-bombard/

    Cyrano,

    You are incorrect concerning the use of stirrups in the West.

    http://m.thelatinlibrary.com/imperialism/notes/tours.html

    Read this account of the conflicts between the Iberian Moors and the Franks under Charles Martel in the mid-700s, specifically the section “Aftermath”, in which the Frankish innovation (or adoption) of stirrups is discussed that permitted them to field HEAVY CAVALRY to supplement their fearsome infantry, and gradually drive the Moors back beyond the Pyrenees.

    The 700s, note. This does not discount other tactical innovations by the later Mongols, but let’s get this misapprehension about the Mongol INVENTION of the stirrup sorted out, shall we? Parallel evolution is nothing new, I hope you will acknowledge.

    Regards,
    JJ

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cyrano
    Welcome to the club. The club which misses the point, that is. How about you read this instead:

    http://bigera5.weebly.com/the-mongolian-stirrup

    Btw, the point that you missed, along with everyone else is: It's not important who invented the stirrups, but who was able to find a better use for them than anyone else. Inventing something doesn't mean that you'll be the best at it forever. Take example with the tank, the Brits invented it in WW1, but the best use for it was found by the Germans in WW2.

    Thus saying that the Germans could not draw tactical advantage by using the tank because it's the British who invented it doesn't make any sense. Do you understand now? And enough already about the stupid stirrups.
    , @Alfa158
    My reading was that the Scythians invented the stirrup at around the time of the end of the Western Roman Empire. Prior to that there had been toe loops sometimes used only to help the rider get into the saddle. Stirrups are one of those inventions that seem so obvious that you can't imagine why they weren't invented almost immediately. People routinely rode on horseback for roughly 1000 years before stirrups were developed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Alden
    Genghis Khan did not conquer Europe. He conquered Central Asia and the eastern part of the Middle East.
    Europeans were using stirrups 75 years after the Koreans invented them. War material inventions spread very quickly.

    A Persian once explained to me how the Turks were able to conquer the Byzantine Empire and big chunks of Persia. He said the same as Anotoly Karlin did in comment 18.

    The Mongols and Turks raided and ran. The sedentary cultures could never get them in a set battle. The Mongols also had vastly more soldiers, horses etc And they had nothing to lose.

    I don’t think you have a full grasp of the issue, pal. It’s not the question of whether the Europeans knew about the stirrups and whether they were using them, the issue is how they were using them. And they were using them just to get on the horse and that was it. The Mongols were using them throughout the battle, to stand up and get a better shot. Your theory about the military tactics of the Turks is bull too. Read about the sieges of Constantinople and Vienna. I don’t see any “raids” there, just classic sieges.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    The conquest of Constantinople and the numerous sieges of Vienna were done by Turks, not Mongolians completely different ethnic groups.
    Those sieges occurred centuries after the Tatar Mongolians conquered Russia.
    It's just rude that your reply to me was so agressive and arrogant The least you could do is to consult the 4th grade level Wikepedia about the difference between Mongolians and Turks
    It was a Persian Muslim immigrant, a history prof back in Persia who explained to me how the raid and run strategy of the Turks was so successful
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    That's a perfectly understandable position that I have a lot of sympathy for: http://www.unz.com/akarlin/limits-to-cognitive-elitism/

    Anatoly….Steve Sailer….and Jared Taylor….and Paul Kersey

    If you google..Google Images:NASA Rocket Scientists large blackboard Celestial Mechanics calculation….To make a long story short:all White Guys…White Shirts with ties about twenty-thirty of them doing a massive Celestial Mechanics Calculation on a yuge blackboard!!!!..0 Chinese Legal Immigrants and Hindu Legal Immigrants in the photo. This was a 1960s NASA publicity photo…..Who the F would be opposed to this Demographic state of affairs? The Chinese and Hindus in California?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Truth
    Well now, the stark irony, Old Boy, is that the Russian IQ is 3-4 points lower than that of the US...

    Try it again Old Top: list of native IQs
    US 98.3
    Russia 98.0
    98.3 – 98.0 = 0.3 not “3 to 4″
    I know, math is hard.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Not when the author came here.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @MarkinLA
    I am not so sure that really means you had high IQs given the relatively low level of sophistication in ancient wars. They certainly didn't have the alleged intelligence of Archimedes who during the defense of Syracuse is supposed to have used the polished shields of his troops to focus light and ignite fires on the Roman ships or use large counterweights and hooks on a lever to capsize those ships.

    A lot of good generalship involves doing something the other guy doesn't expect you to - or thinks you can't do. There was nothing to stop the huge army of the Ottoman Turks from defending their flanks and making sure Sobieski's army could not put their cannons on the hills overlooking the Ottoman Army. They probably thought it could not be done, the same way the French at Diem Bien Phu thought they would pull the Vietnamese into a decisive battle but found out that the Vietnamese were able to man-haul their big guns through the jungle into high ground and pound the French.

    Most societies knew throwing a dead animal down a well was a good way to poison the water. The Mongols weren't stupid but how much more were they advanced compared to antiquity given the 1000 years that passed.

    the Vietnamese were able to man-haul their big guns through the jungle into high ground and pound the French.

    They don’t have the big guns. wrong
    Even if they have big guns, they can’t bring them to bear in this battle. wrong again
    Even if they have big guns, and deploy them for this battle, we will use our air superiority to knock them out. strike three

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @War for Blair Mountain
    Anatoly


    I d0n't want to legally import high IQ nonwhite Legal Immigrants into the US......for I d0n't want Asians in the Nati0n of my ancestors voting my Racial Tribe into a racial minority. In fact, I want the mass expulsion of all TATA Institute Grads out of America.

    That’s a perfectly understandable position that I have a lot of sympathy for: http://www.unz.com/akarlin/limits-to-cognitive-elitism/

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Anatoly....Steve Sailer....and Jared Taylor....and Paul Kersey

    If you google..Google Images:NASA Rocket Scientists large blackboard Celestial Mechanics calculation....To make a long story short:all White Guys...White Shirts with ties about twenty-thirty of them doing a massive Celestial Mechanics Calculation on a yuge blackboard!!!!..0 Chinese Legal Immigrants and Hindu Legal Immigrants in the photo. This was a 1960s NASA publicity photo.....Who the F would be opposed to this Demographic state of affairs? The Chinese and Hindus in California?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Brian227
    PISA is not a test about cognitive ability but about learning levels achieved. Some people seem obsessed with finding racist implications where there is no adequate evidence. This is a complete misuse of a test whose design hopes to assist countries and educators to move education levels higher. Using it to reach conclusions about innate congnitive abilities is like using a thermometer to predict rain on the following Thursday.

    Take Canada. It has a high level of immigration from all parts of the world. As many as 50% of residents of the Toronto area were born outside Canada. For more than 20 years immigration has been heavily from non-European countries. The system has been designed to control immigrant flows solely to ensure proper absorption of the newcomers without overwhelming community resources. The successful absorption of many from poorer nations that struggle to provide adequate services (many of which do not score well on PISA) has not materially degraded the high performance levels of Canadian education. Calling it "elitist" is not adequate unless you can delineate what that means and show its impact.

    I concur with Olmec that data does not support any contention that immigration levels and source data show anything like this article proposes.

    PISA is not a test about cognitive ability but about learning levels achieved.

    1. PISA correlates very well with explicit tests of cognitive ability.

    2. People with greater cognitive ability tend to achieve higher learning levels. This is especially germane to natives vs. second gen immigrants, who have been exposed to very similar learning (nutritional, etc) environments (who in Europe do not converge).

    The successful absorption of many from poorer nations that struggle to provide adequate services (many of which do not score well on PISA) has not materially degraded the high performance levels of Canadian education.

    Canada has a functionally cognitively elitist immigration policy based on points.

    I mean it is practically an IQ test: http://www.canada-da.com/calculator.html

    However, Canada still dilutes its high quality immigrants with Somali refugees and so the net effect is close to zero instead of positive.

    Read More
    • Replies: @L.K
    Karlin: "PISA correlates very well with explicit tests of cognitive ability."

    PISA scores are NOT a reliable approximation of IQ, as your absurd list of 'native IQs converted from PISA according to calculations by commenter “m”', shows so well.

    The racialreality blog, commented:

    But Lynn already knows the pitfalls of his approach. Finland had the highest score in Europe on the 2006 PISA tests, and using his method leads to a calculated IQ of 107, yet he reports Finns' IQ as being just 97. Romanians' PISA score is near the very bottom of Europe, leading to an estimate of 85, though their measured IQ is in fact 94 according to Lynn, just three points lower than that of Finns. With discrepancies like that, there's absolutely no reason to trust his calculated IQs of around 100 and 90 for Northern and Southern Italians. Clearly, PISA scores are not a good substitute for IQ.
     
    Furthermore:

    Indeed, while some researchers report a strong correlation between general intelligence and educational attainment, one of Lynn's own sources, Deary et al. (2007), addressing two of his other sources, suggests that caution should be exercised when attempting to equate the two:
    Whereas the correlations indicate that around 50% to 60% of the variance in GCSE [General Certificate of Secondary Education] examination points score can be statistically explained by the prior g [general intelligence] factor, by the same token a large proportion of the variance is not accounted for by g. Some of the remaining variance in GCSE scores will be measurement error, but some will be systematic. Thus, non-g factors have a substantial impact on educational attainment. These may include: school attendance and engagement; pupils' personality traits, motivation and effort; the extent of parental support; and the provision of appropriate learning experiences, teaching quality, school ethos, and structure among other possible factors (Petrides, Chamorro-Premuzic, Frederickson, & Furnham, 2005; Strand, 2003).'

     

    Your absurd list has Argentina at 85, while Lynn himself reports Argentina's national IQ as 96.
    His revised data( and work by Wicherts) places Italy at the top of Europe, at 102-103, but in your list, Italy is supposed to have a lower IQ than Portugal, which Lynn has reported as 91-95.
    Ireland he reports at only 87-93. Etc, etc.

    PS: not that I take these IQ values as gospel either.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Take a different perspective for a moment Loads of immigrant 15-year-old traumatised kids who may not speak the language well are not likely to do well on the PISA exam.

    “Otherwise, the cognitive impact of immigration – at least as proxied by the differences in performance on the PISA tests between the national average, which includes immigrant children, versus only native children – is almost entirely negative for its supposed beneficiaries across the entire world.

    Even those few countries with expressly “cognitively elitist” immigration policies see only the most modest of benefits: Singapore: +0.7; Canada: -0.1; Australia: -0.2.

    Otherwise, the only countries not to be significantly affected are those which see little immigration in general, such as Japan and Korea. So perhaps the best way of “winning” the game to attract quality immigrants is to avoid playing it in the first place.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cicerone
    If you go by homemade IQ drop (due to fertility differences, aka dysgenics), then Latin America takes the prize while the Scandinavian countries hardly experience dysgenic fertility at all due to their family policies which indirectly favor highly educated people (free/cheap childcare and an environment where mothers are generally in employment seems to do the trick). The problem however is that their non-dysgenic fertility gets dysgenic nevertheless due to immigration.

    The most favorable conditions seem to be in Canada (selective migration paired with non-dysgenic fertility) and Japan (almost no immigration coupled with only lightly dysgenic trend). Of the developed countries, the US (comparably high dysgenic fertility) and Central Europe are fucked.

    https://farm1.staticflickr.com/746/21683005190_eb722fb3c1_o.png

    “The most favorable conditions seem to be in Canada (selective migration paired with non-dysgenic fertility) and Japan (almost no immigration coupled with only lightly dysgenic trend). Of the developed countries, the US (comparably high dysgenic fertility) and Central Europe are fucked. ”

    Although not a huge part of the population, Canadian Amerindians lower the score of Natives in Canada. The lowest scoring Provinces in Canada, Manitoba and Saskatchewan, have the largest Amerinidan populations. If conditions don’t start to improve for Amerindians, this will have a bigger impact in the future because of their high fertility.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The much larger issue behind-loomimg over Anatoly’s comments….and nobody wants to talk about it:

    1)Post WW2 Legal Immigrant policy:A highly racialized National Origins Immigration Policy that excluded all nonwhites….and no passage of the 1965 Immigration Reform Act. As a consequence, Barack Obama is never born….Hillary Clinton not even remotely a viable POTUS candidate in 2016…America 2016 is 90 percent White Folks!!!

    2)post-WW2…Peace with the Soviet Union. This should have and could have been done.

    Even larger point:1) never happened because East Coast WASP Elites wanted war with the Soviet Union-Russia for one simple reason:GREED!!!

    Since the IQ Test score psychometric debate takes place in the context of post-1965 Immigration Policy….and post-1965 Immigration Policy is reducible to the Cold War with the Russkies!!!!…..The IQ test score debate is also a creature-artifact of the post-WW2 Cold War. This is the context in which the IQ test score debate is posed-and emerges….for otherwise, America would have happily remained 90 percent Native Born White American, completely labor self-sufficient….with a high-real-wage economy for The Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @War for Blair Mountain
    The Cleveland Browns retard Irish Quarterback Frank Ryan...phd Geometric Function theory...A c0njecture of Letho......

    The retard 16 year old Irish Teenage Girl Sarah Flannigan….Public Key Cryptography….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Juggernaut_is_here
    Dear AKarlin Sir,
    If Central Asians are so IQ disadvantaged, then how come they managed to subjugate Russians in the Middle Ages? or were Russians only subjugated by the Mongols who tend to be at 100? I wonder what level of IQ did the Huns have as they managed to raze through Western Europe also

    History is replete with historical episodes in which peoples with lower IQ conquered peoples with higher IQ.

    A current example: The campesinos from Latin America are conquering the United States as Latin America with its lawlessness and other cultural picadillos moves north. The European-Americans are doing little about it. Perhaps a higher IQ is not a credible advantage in these contests.

    I’m reminded of stories about people who are members of Mensa who cannot balance a checkbook or otherwise manage their lives.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @War for Blair Mountain
    Two more retards of Irish ancestry:1)Fields Medal Winner Curtis McMullen....phd under Irish retard Dennis Sullivan.....2)Fields Medal winner...the retard Daniel Quillen....

    The Cleveland Browns retard Irish Quarterback Frank Ryan…phd Geometric Function theory…A c0njecture of Letho……

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    The retard 16 year old Irish Teenage Girl Sarah Flannigan....Public Key Cryptography....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @War for Blair Mountain
    Halpenny

    Robert Langlands....the humungus mathematical edifice known as the Langlands Conjecture....a creature of Irish Ancestry....


    Andrew Gleason....Gleason's theorem....well he was half-Irish....the other half Italian.


    John McCarthy....half-Jew...the LISP Man...or should I say:((((((((John McCarthy)))))))=a newly discovered pun in LISP....




    The larger point:Notwithstanding the newly discovered species of Irish cockroach.....The Kennedy Clan in Hyannis Port and Samantha Powers....by Entymologists, the Irish have evolved beyond the Gallicus Roachus Blattaria Species.

    Two more retards of Irish ancestry:1)Fields Medal Winner Curtis McMullen….phd under Irish retard Dennis Sullivan…..2)Fields Medal winner…the retard Daniel Quillen….

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    The Cleveland Browns retard Irish Quarterback Frank Ryan...phd Geometric Function theory...A c0njecture of Letho......
    , @Wizard of Oz
    Did they have Viking genes?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Re list of Native IQ calculated from PISA:
    1. Shoundn’t 100 be average IQ? In this calculation most people are below average (??)
    2. Those above average are just a bit over the average, while those below tend to be dumb as doorknob (??)
    3. You might argue that Jews aren’t what they used to be, but Israeli IQ at 95 is hard to believe.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cicerone
    The standard deviation of IQ is usually normed to be 15.

    Indeed, the only one for which the sd was different that I have heard of was the Cattell IQ test for which the sd was 24.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @reiner Tor
    It's probably worse than that: immigrants might be brighter than the population they leave behind in their home countries. So it might decrease IQs in their original countries as well...

    It works both ways.

    Universal rule: Migrants are misfits.

    They leave because they are, or feel, unsuccessful in their native country.

    In an agricultural country where physical strength and stamina lead to success, misfits will probably have higher IQ than the successful natives, and will move to a place where they think their higher IQ will be valued.

    In a high-tech country where raw IQ leads to success, misfits probably have lower IQ, and will tend to move to a place where physical strength is more important.

    The net result is to steepen the IQ gradient between the agricultural and tech countries.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    How about "in an agricultural country here ownership of [enough] land leads to success"????
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    Thanks. Those look a lot more plausible.

    Unfortunately, the FMS was closed and merged into the MVD in April 2016, their more detailed statistics used to be at http://www.fms.gov.ru/about/statistics/, chapter “Сведения в отношении иностранных граждан, находящихся на территории Российской Федерации…” (some of it can be accessed through archive.org, though)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The drop-off in cognitive ability in the developed nations also strongly correlates to the rise of social media; this might explain China as well.

    I take it that the grey nations are merely those that go largely untested. If Karlin’s assertion held water, one might reasonably expect a number of these grey spots might possibly be green due immigration; alternatively, they could be black-holes that are spewing out cognitive radiation lethal to the cognitive ability of the ROW.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @War for Blair Mountain
    Halpenny


    Think Navier-Stokes Equation....think Stokes....then there is the Hamiltonian....and don't forget Hamilton's beautiful quarternions inscribed on his tombstone....and on a bridge in Ireland.

    Halpenny

    Robert Langlands….the humungus mathematical edifice known as the Langlands Conjecture….a creature of Irish Ancestry….

    Andrew Gleason….Gleason’s theorem….well he was half-Irish….the other half Italian.

    John McCarthy….half-Jew…the LISP Man…or should I say:((((((((John McCarthy)))))))=a newly discovered pun in LISP….

    The larger point:Notwithstanding the newly discovered species of Irish cockroach…..The Kennedy Clan in Hyannis Port and Samantha Powers….by Entymologists, the Irish have evolved beyond the Gallicus Roachus Blattaria Species.

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Two more retards of Irish ancestry:1)Fields Medal Winner Curtis McMullen....phd under Irish retard Dennis Sullivan.....2)Fields Medal winner...the retard Daniel Quillen....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jon Halpenny
    How did the Irish become so smart?

    A generation ago, the Irish were considered to be among the least intelligent people in western Europe.

    Halpenny

    Think Navier-Stokes Equation….think Stokes….then there is the Hamiltonian….and don’t forget Hamilton’s beautiful quarternions inscribed on his tombstone….and on a bridge in Ireland.

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Halpenny

    Robert Langlands....the humungus mathematical edifice known as the Langlands Conjecture....a creature of Irish Ancestry....


    Andrew Gleason....Gleason's theorem....well he was half-Irish....the other half Italian.


    John McCarthy....half-Jew...the LISP Man...or should I say:((((((((John McCarthy)))))))=a newly discovered pun in LISP....




    The larger point:Notwithstanding the newly discovered species of Irish cockroach.....The Kennedy Clan in Hyannis Port and Samantha Powers....by Entymologists, the Irish have evolved beyond the Gallicus Roachus Blattaria Species.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anatoly

    I d0n’t want to legally import high IQ nonwhite Legal Immigrants into the US……for I d0n’t want Asians in the Nati0n of my ancestors voting my Racial Tribe into a racial minority. In fact, I want the mass expulsion of all TATA Institute Grads out of America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    That's a perfectly understandable position that I have a lot of sympathy for: http://www.unz.com/akarlin/limits-to-cognitive-elitism/
    , @Rdm
    You'd be fine. Now we have a president that was unpresidented in US history.

    Beginning from George Bush era for 8 years, and tiny blip of Obama for 8 years, and now we have a better president who will make America great again, I foresee in 100 years time, the Unites States of White nations will enjoy their pastime,

    1. arguing over which reality show is the best,
    2. contemplating where to work: Burger King or McDonald's
    3. longing for the weekend where they can sit and watch from the TV where they show East Asians space-cruising planets to planets

    Of course, War for Blair Mountain occasionally comes and chimes in his thought on immigration.


    Don't believe me? Watch the UK, the once mighty country kneeling over President Xi and playing ping pong with Li Keqiang.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • How did the Irish become so smart?

    A generation ago, the Irish were considered to be among the least intelligent people in western Europe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Halpenny


    Think Navier-Stokes Equation....think Stokes....then there is the Hamiltonian....and don't forget Hamilton's beautiful quarternions inscribed on his tombstone....and on a bridge in Ireland.
    , @Uebersetzer
    "Considered to be" - what a scientific analysis. British cartoonists in the 19th and most of the 20th century loved to depict the Irish with ape-like features. This said more about the British than the Irish, however.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Olmec
    Some data that contradicts the alt-right IQ narrative:

    The latest mass immigration to Israel has been from Russia which has a 3 point IQ advantage over Israel yet Israel loses .87 in IQ as a result.

    Germany's immigrants are overwhelmingly whites from Eastern Europe, Southern Europe and Turkey while the immigrants in France are mostly blacks and browns from Africa, yet Germany loses 0.86 IQ points more than France as a result of immigration.

    Switzerland's immigrant population is overwhelmingly European. Few Africans, Turks or MENAs. Yet it lost even more than Germany in IQ points.

    Austria and Luxembourg's immigrant population is overwhelmingly from the European Union nations, yet along with Germany and Switzerland they constitute the four worst losers in IQ points.


    The Conclusion is unavoidable: immigration from European countries is significantly more harmful to a nation's intelligence than immigration from Africa, Asia, MENA, Latin America.

    These are all valid criticisms.

    Switzerland simply does not have a more dysgenic immigration policy than Germany, Netherlands, and Sweden.

    I also do not see how China’s nearly complete lack of immigrants could cause it to lose more than 0.25 points.

    This is still welcome work, I hope Karlin works to improve his first draft. I would suggest simply ignoring countries without substantial immigration and focusing on the big ones in Western Europe and the Anglosphere.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • PISA is not a test about cognitive ability but about learning levels achieved. Some people seem obsessed with finding racist implications where there is no adequate evidence. This is a complete misuse of a test whose design hopes to assist countries and educators to move education levels higher. Using it to reach conclusions about innate congnitive abilities is like using a thermometer to predict rain on the following Thursday.

    Take Canada. It has a high level of immigration from all parts of the world. As many as 50% of residents of the Toronto area were born outside Canada. For more than 20 years immigration has been heavily from non-European countries. The system has been designed to control immigrant flows solely to ensure proper absorption of the newcomers without overwhelming community resources. The successful absorption of many from poorer nations that struggle to provide adequate services (many of which do not score well on PISA) has not materially degraded the high performance levels of Canadian education. Calling it “elitist” is not adequate unless you can delineate what that means and show its impact.

    I concur with Olmec that data does not support any contention that immigration levels and source data show anything like this article proposes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    PISA is not a test about cognitive ability but about learning levels achieved.
     
    1. PISA correlates very well with explicit tests of cognitive ability.

    2. People with greater cognitive ability tend to achieve higher learning levels. This is especially germane to natives vs. second gen immigrants, who have been exposed to very similar learning (nutritional, etc) environments (who in Europe do not converge).

    The successful absorption of many from poorer nations that struggle to provide adequate services (many of which do not score well on PISA) has not materially degraded the high performance levels of Canadian education.
     
    Canada has a functionally cognitively elitist immigration policy based on points.

    I mean it is practically an IQ test: http://www.canada-da.com/calculator.html

    However, Canada still dilutes its high quality immigrants with Somali refugees and so the net effect is close to zero instead of positive.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cyrano
    The reason why the Mongols conquered Russia – and most of Europe during Genghis Khan, was because they had small technological advantage which in medieval times was huge. What was that technological advantage? The stirrup.

    The Mongols were renowned for being great horsemen and using the stirrup apparently gave them the advantage of being able to raise themselves up in the saddle and chop heads more effectively, or use arrows better. While the Europeans – and probably the Russians too, used to sit in the saddle like a pile of turds – thus reducing their effectiveness. Amazing, isn’t it? I actually learned this in elementary school from my good old history teacher.

    Does using the stirrup made the Mongolians more intelligent? I doubt it. They were just lucky that it made such a huge difference. Other than that, they had nothing else to show as proof of their “intelligence”.

    Same with the Turks. They were terrorizing Europe for almost 200 years, twice coming close to conquering the whole Europe (the two sieges of Vienna) and converting everybody to Islam. Their technological advantage? Gunpowder and the cannon – which they didn’t even invent – the Chinese did. Did that make them more intelligent than the Europeans? I doubt it again.

    One small (OK big) invention does not qualify them as more intelligent (especially if it’s not theirs to begin with). They simply stumbled upon it and recognized its potential. At the time the Europeans were living in the fairy tale middle ages, when the favorite method of defense were fortresses, which the cannon made almost obsolete. Sometimes you just get lucky, and one small technological advantage can make a huge difference, without intelligence playing a major part.

    Genghis Khan did not conquer Europe. He conquered Central Asia and the eastern part of the Middle East.
    Europeans were using stirrups 75 years after the Koreans invented them. War material inventions spread very quickly.

    A Persian once explained to me how the Turks were able to conquer the Byzantine Empire and big chunks of Persia. He said the same as Anotoly Karlin did in comment 18.

    The Mongols and Turks raided and ran. The sedentary cultures could never get them in a set battle. The Mongols also had vastly more soldiers, horses etc And they had nothing to lose.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cyrano
    I don't think you have a full grasp of the issue, pal. It's not the question of whether the Europeans knew about the stirrups and whether they were using them, the issue is how they were using them. And they were using them just to get on the horse and that was it. The Mongols were using them throughout the battle, to stand up and get a better shot. Your theory about the military tactics of the Turks is bull too. Read about the sieges of Constantinople and Vienna. I don't see any "raids" there, just classic sieges.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Hominid average brain size increased about 7 cc /10k years over a period of 800,000 years, peaking at about 1500 cc about 10,000 years ago. Since then, average brain size has shrunk from 1500 cc to about 1350 cc. CroMagnons and Neanderthals both on average had larger brains than modern hominids…..they had to be plenty smart to survive and reproduce in an environment where modern 2016 hominids couldn’t make it a week without entering the food chain. This decrease in brain size, commencing with the transition from nomadic hunter gatherer to stationary agrarian, has been masked because: 1) knowledge is cumulative, and 2) 2% of any population does 98% of the thinking anyways. Modern hominids are being selected for traits like: ability to make drug deals using an obama phone, ability to swipe a food stamp card, ability to fake a lower back pain to get on disability, etc etc.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @reiner Tor
    1500 and even 500 years ago IQ levels could have been very different from what they are now.

    For example Greg Cochran thinks Middle Eastern IQs before the Arab conquest might've been around 100 (the IQ of Maronite hill farmers). It's also likely that European (probably including Russians etc.) IQs were lower that time, cf. Greg Clark's work, especially A Farewell to Alms.

    So Mongols might have had an IQ advantage over Russians, and Tatars etc. might've been their equals. But the reason for their conquest was the huge military advantage of nomads, regardless of IQ.

    Excellent comment. People are very ignorant of the actual history of Islam, because it’s too “controversial” to share, but if one digs into it he finds that the major tenet of Islam throughout the centuries was to dominate, convert, and subjugate by force all other peoples.

    So essentially, low IQ Muslims took over both literally and genetically as they spread out of the deserts. They were up against mostly peaceful Christians, pagans, zororasts, Buddhists, etc who were no match.

    So you have to consider the pre-muslim and post-muslim genetic makeup of a country. Take Turkey: today it is 99% Muslim, but it used to be the heart of a Christian empire once, with almost no Muslims. Once you understand exactly how Turkey went from 0% to 99% Muslim, you will truly understand Islam.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ali Choudhury
    Islam spread quickly because the Byzantine Empire and the Persian Sassanid dynasty had bled each other dry in the prior decades and were exhausted. I doubt either empire could be described as being mostly peaceful\Christian\pagan etc.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Olmec
    Some data that contradicts the alt-right IQ narrative:

    The latest mass immigration to Israel has been from Russia which has a 3 point IQ advantage over Israel yet Israel loses .87 in IQ as a result.

    Germany's immigrants are overwhelmingly whites from Eastern Europe, Southern Europe and Turkey while the immigrants in France are mostly blacks and browns from Africa, yet Germany loses 0.86 IQ points more than France as a result of immigration.

    Switzerland's immigrant population is overwhelmingly European. Few Africans, Turks or MENAs. Yet it lost even more than Germany in IQ points.

    Austria and Luxembourg's immigrant population is overwhelmingly from the European Union nations, yet along with Germany and Switzerland they constitute the four worst losers in IQ points.


    The Conclusion is unavoidable: immigration from European countries is significantly more harmful to a nation's intelligence than immigration from Africa, Asia, MENA, Latin America.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Juggernaut_is_here
    Reiner Tor

    Thanks for the information, that's a lot to chew on..I guess the Islamic tradition of cousin marriage also depressed the region, and may be weather in Iraq,Syria became much drier in the past few thousand years leading to higher degree of malnutrition? (Unlikely though)

    @akarlin

    No it was in earnest.. I have personally found PumpkinPerson's attempt to give an unified version of world history through IQ very compelling, but I feel one or two other factors have to be taken into account , namely average racial testosterone and curiosity level (as mentioned in Dr. James Thompson's blog)


    I feel that curiosity index can be positioned as a derived unit which comes into existence when High IQ (125+) meets a higher than average level of testosterone..This might explain Western European success in scientific and engineering disciplines compared to East Asians. There are others reasons too, as noted by you, that the Chinese were on the cusp of the Scientific Method but then somehow fell into disarray.

    So success of different races in terms of expansion and empire building can be a function of the
    area enclosed by the IQ, Testosterone graph OR the volume enclosed by the IQ,Testosterone,curiosity index provided that there is a certain IQ/Testosterone ratio range to achieve empire building just as there needs to be certain Bore/Stroke ratio in engines to extract 9000+ rpm. (This would cancel out Sub Saharan Africa)

    Anyways that's my basic conjecture regarding impact of different races on world history.

    Though I feel that temporary,occasional, permanent NoFap/semen retention can overcome limits of HBD when it comes to individuals as evinced from the lives of many Great Men.


    NoSurf (alluded by you in the Logging Off post) should also help

    I feel that curiosity index can be positioned as a derived unit which comes into existence when High IQ (125+) meets a higher than average level of testosterone.

    Yes, or at least something that correlates with testosterone.

    If civilization selects for certain traits: say IQ and conscientousness and selects against “barbarian” traits like aggression, testosterone and you need an optimal mixture to get creative golden ages then civilizations would generally reach and then pass that optimal point.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RaceRealist88
    Nutrition studies barely get much larger than 30 to 40 participants. It's good enough.

    "”… a study with TWELVE subjects proved that IQ increase with reforced study”"

    You don't understand that soy has estrogenic compounds that lower testosterone in men. It's like BPA, a chemical in plastic. It's shown to have feminization effects on men and has it's also been shown to have negative effects for women, specifically when pregnant.

    So just because this study was only on 12 men, doesn't mean it's wrong. You have to understand that different compounds and chemicals in foods do different things in the body.

    "Whatever i don’t eat ”meat-soy” anyway.:

    SOY DECREASES TESTOSTERONE.

    "Why tiranossaurus rex was a big predator and with that LITTLE brain**"

    Had a particularly large brain.

    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/feb/08/dinosaurs-intelligence-brain-size

    "How vegetarian-diet dinossaurs with huge bodies could have existed*"

    They got bigger due to their environment, not their diet.

    http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/280/1751/20122526

    "Why although similar meat-diet consume levels of southern and northern europeans the second group is or become taller*"

    Source?

    http://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/whey-to-go-soy-protein-lowers-testosterone-in-strength-training-men/

    "Levels of serum testosterone before and after the experiment,"

    Decreased testosterone 19%.

    "Meat-consume increase testosterone**"

    Depending on the meat, it has high fat. Men who eat more meat have higher levels of testosterone than men who don't eat meat. Animal products contain fats and proteins that increase testosterone. It's largely due to the animal fats.

    You have to understand, but i know it’s impossible in your level, that you don’t understand enough what you believe you know, period.

    http://karlasantone.com.br/derrubando-o-mito-das-proteinas-conheca-os-5-mitos-mais-comuns/

    Western ”diet”, specially in this days is EXCESSIVE.

    Only a long term study will satisfatorily to prove if soy really cause testosterone shrinking, and specially without previous artificial increase of testosterone caused by habitual excessive ”meat” consume.

    Men who eat more meat have higher levels of testosterone than men who don’t eat meat

    SOOOURCE*

    causation or causality**

    I will not go to comment more in the progressively trashy PP blog (worse and worse with that ape and other trashy subhumans as you) AND i will not go more to ”debate” with a mentally challenged insect as you, the last time of all.

    You’re just like a gymnast who think that is gifted and start to training difficult exercises BUT you can’t do it, so instead you improved your performance you worsened it.

    Translating to this context

    You think you’re a super-thinker and you push hard for yourself many intellectual challenges BUT you can’t do it, so instead you improved your own performance you foolish yourself all the time and without a fu…ing pale awareness.

    I already catch everything about you

    You don’t give a miserable f..ck to the non-human animal rights to have a minimally decent life,
    everybody choice to live this torment call life in their own way and you ”choice” the prole mode, sculpting your muscles above a non-human animal ‘holocaust”,

    you think i’m the guy who use ad hoc ”rationalizations” of course because you only use your mirror to see your muscular as.

    but it’s you who try to JUSTIFY your lack of any compassion, so instead you be ”direct, straight, honest”

    just like that

    ”yes, i don’t give a shutz to the non-human animal well being…”

    you try justify via ad hoc why you can be a asshole and a kind person in the same time. NO.

    You’re a hopeless contradictory person who have a 88, nazi symbol in your own nickname, a blog with a bell curve and a comparative (both artificially manipulated) image of three women of the most important macro-races, but you internalize a lot of ”blank slate” pre-conceptions and use academic-common sense proto-arguments, or appeal to the ”authority” ( Razib agree with me) or just quoted other people, without google you no had any chance to remain live in most of debates you have participated.

    Surprisling you’re still a coward cuck or a miserable italian-american who don’t know where you’re going on. You have fear about some comments in PP blog, pathetic.

    I already showed for you where or how you’re shockling contradictory

    a example

    ”no there such thing superior or inferior in evolution…….. bacterias represented important part of earth ground”

    translating to the good listener

    ”bacterias ARE SUPERIOR than humans” (… in this aspect)

    Typical from a average joey to contradict itself without take note about it = fooling yourself.

    ”Had a particularly large brain.”

    They were geniuses…

    This type of debate, a moral issue, is IMPOSSIBLY understandable by a kind of people as you.

    It’s not the same language, no doubt about it, waste of time.

    You have a poorer ”moral theory of mind”, aka, empathy, you simply no have it well developed.

    But i have.

    ”Decreased testosterone 19%.”

    number-level of testosterone before and after.

    my last words for you…

    Read More
    • Replies: @RaceRealist88
    "You have to understand, but i know it’s impossible in your level, that you don’t understand enough what you believe you know, period."

    My friend, I literally handle peoples's nutrition and I know what different micros and macros do in the body.

    "http://karlasantone.com.br/derrubando-o-mito-das-proteinas-conheca-os-5-mitos-mais-comuns/"

    "Many people do not know how much protein they need or how much they are getting"

    Right.

    "vegetables, whole grains and legumes are excellent sources of protein without the health risks from meat and other animal products"

    There are no 'health risks' from eating animal products. The one study that came out saying that red meat causes cancer, specifically red meat cooked over charcoal briquettes. I believe the increase in cancer was like 5 percent, I haven't read the study in a while. But what the stupid news articles didn't say was that the increase in cancer was extremely negligible.

    One more thing, most plant proteins are incomplete proteins and you need to combine some plant proteins to make complete proteins. The average person doesn't know how to supplement their diet correctly.

    "One study found that those who consume more animal protein increased their risk of diabetes by 22%. Excessive protein intake is also associated with osteoporosis, cancer, kidney failure and heart disease."

    No it doesn't.

    http://www.zoeharcombe.com/2014/03/animal-protein-as-bad-as-smoking/

    "Someone who weighs 70 pounds only needs 56 grams of protein a day. The recommended amount (RDA) of protein for the average adult is 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight."

    Does this person go to the gym or not? Protein recommendations depend on whether or not the person is a gym-goer.

    "Carbohydrates are the body's primary source of energy and should occupy most of your plate"

    LOL do you understand how horribly wrong this is?

    Carbohydrates spike insulin the most. Insulin inhibits the breakdown of fat in the adipose tissue by inhibiting the lipase that hydrolyzes (the chemical breakdown of a compound due to a reaction with water) the fat out of the cell. Since insulin facilitates the entry of glucose into the cell, when this occurs, the glucose is synthesized into glycerol. Along with the fatty acids in the liver, they both are synthesized into triglycerides in the liver. Due to these mechanisms, insulin is directly involved with the shuttling of more fat into the adipocyte. Since insulin has this effect on fat metabolism in the body, it has a fat-sparing effect. Insulin drives most cells to prefer carbohydrates for energy. Putting it all together, insulin indirectly stimulates the accumulation of fat into the adipose tissue.

    http://arbl.cvmbs.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/endocrine/pancreas/insulin_phys.html

    "Truth: There is no need to plan meals around complementary proteins . In 2009, the "Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics" (AND) released an article stating that eating a variety of plant foods throughout the day provides all the necessary amino acids. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention agrees with the DNA and discredits the rumor that humans need to eat certain proteins together to receive proper nutrition."

    Ummmm if you eat two incomplete proteins that don't make a complete protein, you're not getting the correct amount of amino acids.

    "Excess calorie protein will not magically turn into muscle. To lose weight in a healthy way, it is important to have a balanced diet with a focus on all the necessary nutrients. Instead of following the fad of proteins, many people could benefit by finding ways to incorporate plant sources of protein into their meals."

    Protein-rich diets keep you sated longer and staves off muscle catabolism while you're in a caloric deficit. Protein needs to be high during a caloric deficit.

    There are no problems with high-protein diets if the individual is healthy.

    "SOOOURCE*"

    https://www.muscleforlife.com/9-ways-to-naturally-boost-your-testosterone-production/

    "causation or causality**"

    Fats from meat raise testsoterone.

    "”bacterias ARE SUPERIOR than humans” (… in this aspect)"

    You don't understand what I'm saying.

    Evolution is NOT progressive since bacteria is the MODE. Bacteria hasn't changed in 3.8 billion years. Do some reading bro.

    http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_bacteria.html

    Half of all of the biomass on earth is bacteria. Muh anthropometric superiority.

    "You have a poorer ”moral theory of mind”, aka, empathy, you simply no have it well developed."

    Yeaaaaa you don't know what you're talking about.

    "number-level of testosterone before and after."


    The mean ± SD of testosterone was 411 ± 175.82 ng/dL (range 198 to 872 ng/dL) at the start of therapy, 393 ± 194.24 ng/dL (range 182 to 759 ng/dL) at day 28, and 438 ± 95.46 ng/dL (range 263 to 587 ng/dL) at day 42, 2 weeks after treatment was discontinued (Fig. 1 )
     
    http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/16/4/829?ijkey=8b39ea992a903f976c44216459b8e251e3baa8d1&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha#F1
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @5371
    You're not only dead wrong on the details, your whole view of history is normie-tier. Looking for some specific invention as the cause of every political/military change shows great ignorance.

    You got it man. Another example – US without the nuclear weapons and how much they influenced the outcome of the WW2 against Japan and how it transformed them into superpower which without those weapons they would have never be able to become to the extent that they became and why they would never give up on those nuclear weapons. Clearly technological advantage doesn’t play any role in history. Do me a favor, will you? Don’t respond to my comments anymore, you don’t have the intelligence to discuss anything with me.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Well, I guess it's better that you take out your grumpiness and rage on Internet arguments instead of getting into physical fights with everyone you encounter.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Santoculto
    ''Twelve subjects''

    ''... a study with TWELVE subjects proved that IQ increase with reforced study''

    And in the long-long term...

    Maybe this is the first reaction of the organism to adapt to new diet.

    Whatever i don't eat ''meat-soy'' anyway.


    Why tiranossaurus rex was a big predator and with that LITTLE brain**

    How vegetarian-diet dinossaurs with huge bodies could have existed*

    Why although similar meat-diet consume levels of southern and northern europeans the second group is or become taller*

    or better,

    you don't need ''explain''...

    Nutrition studies barely get much larger than 30 to 40 participants. It’s good enough.

    “”… a study with TWELVE subjects proved that IQ increase with reforced study””

    You don’t understand that soy has estrogenic compounds that lower testosterone in men. It’s like BPA, a chemical in plastic. It’s shown to have feminization effects on men and has it’s also been shown to have negative effects for women, specifically when pregnant.

    So just because this study was only on 12 men, doesn’t mean it’s wrong. You have to understand that different compounds and chemicals in foods do different things in the body.

    “Whatever i don’t eat ”meat-soy” anyway.:

    SOY DECREASES TESTOSTERONE.

    “Why tiranossaurus rex was a big predator and with that LITTLE brain**

    Had a particularly large brain.

    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/feb/08/dinosaurs-intelligence-brain-size

    “How vegetarian-diet dinossaurs with huge bodies could have existed*”

    They got bigger due to their environment, not their diet.

    http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/280/1751/20122526

    “Why although similar meat-diet consume levels of southern and northern europeans the second group is or become taller*”

    Source?

    http://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/whey-to-go-soy-protein-lowers-testosterone-in-strength-training-men/

    “Levels of serum testosterone before and after the experiment,”

    Decreased testosterone 19%.

    “Meat-consume increase testosterone**

    Depending on the meat, it has high fat. Men who eat more meat have higher levels of testosterone than men who don’t eat meat. Animal products contain fats and proteins that increase testosterone. It’s largely due to the animal fats.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Santoculto
    You have to understand, but i know it's impossible in your level, that you don't understand enough what you believe you know, period.

    http://karlasantone.com.br/derrubando-o-mito-das-proteinas-conheca-os-5-mitos-mais-comuns/

    Western ''diet'', specially in this days is EXCESSIVE.

    Only a long term study will satisfatorily to prove if soy really cause testosterone shrinking, and specially without previous artificial increase of testosterone caused by habitual excessive ''meat'' consume.


    Men who eat more meat have higher levels of testosterone than men who don’t eat meat
     
    SOOOURCE*

    causation or causality**

    I will not go to comment more in the progressively trashy PP blog (worse and worse with that ape and other trashy subhumans as you) AND i will not go more to ''debate'' with a mentally challenged insect as you, the last time of all.

    You're just like a gymnast who think that is gifted and start to training difficult exercises BUT you can't do it, so instead you improved your performance you worsened it.

    Translating to this context

    You think you're a super-thinker and you push hard for yourself many intellectual challenges BUT you can't do it, so instead you improved your own performance you foolish yourself all the time and without a fu...ing pale awareness.

    I already catch everything about you

    You don't give a miserable f..ck to the non-human animal rights to have a minimally decent life,
    everybody choice to live this torment call life in their own way and you ''choice'' the prole mode, sculpting your muscles above a non-human animal 'holocaust'',

    you think i'm the guy who use ad hoc ''rationalizations'' of course because you only use your mirror to see your muscular as.

    but it's you who try to JUSTIFY your lack of any compassion, so instead you be ''direct, straight, honest''

    just like that

    ''yes, i don't give a shutz to the non-human animal well being...''

    you try justify via ad hoc why you can be a asshole and a kind person in the same time. NO.

    You're a hopeless contradictory person who have a 88, nazi symbol in your own nickname, a blog with a bell curve and a comparative (both artificially manipulated) image of three women of the most important macro-races, but you internalize a lot of ''blank slate'' pre-conceptions and use academic-common sense proto-arguments, or appeal to the ''authority'' ( Razib agree with me) or just quoted other people, without google you no had any chance to remain live in most of debates you have participated.

    Surprisling you're still a coward cuck or a miserable italian-american who don't know where you're going on. You have fear about some comments in PP blog, pathetic.


    I already showed for you where or how you're shockling contradictory

    a example

    ''no there such thing superior or inferior in evolution........ bacterias represented important part of earth ground''

    translating to the good listener

    ''bacterias ARE SUPERIOR than humans'' (... in this aspect)

    Typical from a average joey to contradict itself without take note about it = fooling yourself.


    ''Had a particularly large brain.''

    They were geniuses...


    This type of debate, a moral issue, is IMPOSSIBLY understandable by a kind of people as you.

    It's not the same language, no doubt about it, waste of time.

    You have a poorer ''moral theory of mind'', aka, empathy, you simply no have it well developed.

    But i have.

    ''Decreased testosterone 19%.''

    number-level of testosterone before and after.

    my last words for you...

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • It’s not enough to disclose the sources of the article. The method has to be revealed too.

    Frankly, I think it’s bogus science like the article recently tracing greek ancestry to the north, around the Danube.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Olmec
    Some data that contradicts the alt-right IQ narrative:

    The latest mass immigration to Israel has been from Russia which has a 3 point IQ advantage over Israel yet Israel loses .87 in IQ as a result.

    Germany's immigrants are overwhelmingly whites from Eastern Europe, Southern Europe and Turkey while the immigrants in France are mostly blacks and browns from Africa, yet Germany loses 0.86 IQ points more than France as a result of immigration.

    Switzerland's immigrant population is overwhelmingly European. Few Africans, Turks or MENAs. Yet it lost even more than Germany in IQ points.

    Austria and Luxembourg's immigrant population is overwhelmingly from the European Union nations, yet along with Germany and Switzerland they constitute the four worst losers in IQ points.


    The Conclusion is unavoidable: immigration from European countries is significantly more harmful to a nation's intelligence than immigration from Africa, Asia, MENA, Latin America.
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RaceRealist88
    Soy decreases testosterone.

    Soy protein powder decreases serum testosterone levels in healthy men and acts as an ER-beta agonist; the significance of this biological effect with respect to cancer prevention needs further study.
     
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17416779

    Race of participants,

    Levels of serum testosterone before and after the experiment,

    and

    Meat-consume increase testosterone**

    And it is a good thing all the time*

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cyrano

    Your teacher was wrong. Stirrups long predated the Mongols and had spread throughout all of Europe by the close of the first millennium.
     
    I don't think he was:

    http://www.nysedregents.org/globalhistorygeography/613/glhg62013-rg2w.pdf

    Read page 3.


    Bombards were in heavy use in Europe from the 14th century. The guy who built the big guns used in the taking of Constantinople was a Hungarian (ironically, his name was Orban).
     
    It doesn't matter who build it, it matters who commissioned him to build it - the Turks.

    http://www.guns.com/2012/01/04/guns-that-changed-history-the-great-turkish-bombard/

    You’re not only dead wrong on the details, your whole view of history is normie-tier. Looking for some specific invention as the cause of every political/military change shows great ignorance.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cyrano
    You got it man. Another example - US without the nuclear weapons and how much they influenced the outcome of the WW2 against Japan and how it transformed them into superpower which without those weapons they would have never be able to become to the extent that they became and why they would never give up on those nuclear weapons. Clearly technological advantage doesn't play any role in history. Do me a favor, will you? Don't respond to my comments anymore, you don't have the intelligence to discuss anything with me.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Olmec
    Some data that contradicts the alt-right IQ narrative:

    The latest mass immigration to Israel has been from Russia which has a 3 point IQ advantage over Israel yet Israel loses .87 in IQ as a result.

    Germany's immigrants are overwhelmingly whites from Eastern Europe, Southern Europe and Turkey while the immigrants in France are mostly blacks and browns from Africa, yet Germany loses 0.86 IQ points more than France as a result of immigration.

    Switzerland's immigrant population is overwhelmingly European. Few Africans, Turks or MENAs. Yet it lost even more than Germany in IQ points.

    Austria and Luxembourg's immigrant population is overwhelmingly from the European Union nations, yet along with Germany and Switzerland they constitute the four worst losers in IQ points.


    The Conclusion is unavoidable: immigration from European countries is significantly more harmful to a nation's intelligence than immigration from Africa, Asia, MENA, Latin America.
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.