The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / On "Chechens"
 All Comments / On "Chechens"
    Very interesting news today: according to the journal Izvestia, Russia will be sending operators from the so-called "Chechen" special forces battalions "West" and "East" to Syria to "guard the Russian installations" in Khmeimim and Tartus. According to Russian sources, these two battalions have been converted into a "military police" force which will be fully deployed...
  • @Sean
    Assad the elder drove the US and Israel out of Lebanon with Shia suicide bombings, then his son tried the same trick against the US soldiers (real soldiers) in Iraq Syria was the conduit through which the foreign suicide bombers entered Iraq to kill American). Bashir Assad wanted to defend himself against an immanent American attack, which was crap analysis because the US were uninterested in him. However his proxy terrorist didn't just go for the US occupation force, they began attacking the Sunni who responded in kind and it turned Iraq into a bloodbath Sunni-Shia civil war. Then the Sunni radicals that had been created in Iraq by Assad the younger;s meddling became a major force in the ciil war. The Russians were laughing up their sleeve as US soldiers were being killed by the thousands by their pal Assad's proxy killers, well they are not laughing now. Their Billy the Puppet regime is going to lose.

    “the US were uninterested in him”

    “A Clean Break”
    PNAC

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @NoseytheDuke
    We'll have to disagree. Of course the Soviets had their own interests, Afghanistan is strategically located. Afghans were among the poorest people with the lowest literacy and one of the highest infant mortality rates in the world when Soviet influence began. They did build roads and begin the introduction of modernity in ways of essential infrastructure, health and education. It was a secular government, imperfect as it may have been.

    It's all very well for people living in the first world to talk about not wanting outside influence but it makes no sense when living in a pitiful and backwards state. Compare muslim Afghanistan to what was pre-war muslim Iraq, Syria or Pakistan next door.

    You say there was lots of grass roots opposition as well as the warlords and tribal leaders but we both know it was the CIA that stirred up the poo. Who knows what might have been had they been left alone and post-collapse Soviet Union they would have had independence anyway and all that remained. Look at the mess it is now.

    Hey NtD,

    One can definitely disagree on whether they like the outcome or not – depends on their priorities. Afghanistan was no doubt a very illiterate and poor country. Again, the process of modernization is at issue here – not necessarily the goal. All European empires came into the Muslim world with one or another version of the “White Man’s Burden” and all of them were fought. You just don’t do that in Muslim lands, intervening non-Muslim armies will be fought no matter what their stated goals.

    If they want to be altruistic, they have to help those people get on their feet on their own terms and in a way that jives with and does not threaten their local culture. I can tell you right now, as a man who has no problem sending his daughter for a college education; I would still have picked up a rifle and started shooting at armed Russian invaders supporting a Communist regime had I lived in Afghanistan – especially had I heard about what the Communists did to the faith of the people of places like Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, etc. One must see it from the frame of mind of those that are religious and traditionally minded (as Mr. Roy is able to do) like so many of the Afghans. Though it is great to be able to combine success in spirit and material – loss of material doesn’t bother us as much as loss of faith – it is better to remain in faith and be half-starving in Somalia than to lose one’s faith while living in the material opulence of Sweden (and the Swedes have unfortunately lost practically all of their faith)”
    “By Allah, I do not fear poverty for you, but rather I fear you will be given the wealth of the world just as it was given to those before you. You will compete for it just as they competed for it and it will destroy you just as it destroyed them.” – reported in Bukhari and Muslim

    The CIA did indeed come to stir the poo as they loved to do in South America and other places, but I can assure you, the poo was already boiling before they came with ladle in hand.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • […] L’article original a été publié sur The Unz Review […]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey NtD,

    Yes, the Soviets were doing that stuff. The Americans were also building schools and such to win hearts and minds. It reminds me of a conversation that the invading French held with some tribal elders in Algeria.
    "According to one history book, when an Algerian elderly was told that the French armies were sent to spread Western civilization, his reaction was brief, stern, and direct. If that was truly the case, he observed, why did they bring so much gunpowder with them."
    http://decolonialtranslation.com/english/gunpowdermissiriENG.html

    If the Russians simply wanted to volunteer to build roads out of mere altruism, nobody would have objected. But they came in to support a Communist government which was trying to make sweeping reforms that were seen as very hostile to a traditional, religious people:
    "The prime cause of the uprisings was the authoritarian way in which the new regime imposed its reforms a few months after the coup of 27 April 1978...To achieve this they adopted three means: repression, made possible by the existence of a loyal and well-equipped army; agrarian reform which, they thought, would win the support of the mass of the people; and the elimination of illiteracy, in order to rescue the people from the influence of the clergy and to spread the new ideology."
    https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/islam-and-resistance-in-afghanistan/the-communist-reforms-and-the-repression-19789/02A5B5E3181BFE5B9C3AFFF8DE93962F

    The resistance was beyond just tribal leaders and war lords. It was down to the average Afghan. There is no problem with modernizing* Afghanistan - but it must be done on their terms; if one wants to introduce co-education of the sexes and indoctrination of Dialectic Materialism then it will be resisted.

    Again, please read Oliver Roy's book if you get a chance. Despite slight mistakes, he really gets one into the shoes of a Muslim culture to understand why these changes were not welcome.


    medieval minded
     
    Were it only so. 'Medieval' is a pejorative in European cultures due to their experience - this is quite understandable. It is not the case with Muslims. The vast majority of the scholars I quote from are indeed medieval scholars; their depth of understanding and humanity is something that is deplorably lacking in modern-day Muslims. Mr. Roy describes the curriculum that the senior Afghan ulema had to go through, based on the (yes, medieval) Nizami system:
    "The curriculum, which could take ten years to complete, comprised 106 books having to do with theology (according to the Ashari doctrine), the commentary on the Qur'an, the Hanafite fiqh, and the hadith, and also included Arabic and Persian grammar, literature, Greek and Arab philosophy, astronomy and medieval geometry, the branch of medicine known as 'Greek' (yunani) and logic."

    *Modernization is not simply neutral. I highly recommend Neil Postman's 'Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology' in understanding that introduction of technology into a society fundamentally changes its foundational framework:
    https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/1511641-technopoly-the-surrender-of-culture-to-technology

    We’ll have to disagree. Of course the Soviets had their own interests, Afghanistan is strategically located. Afghans were among the poorest people with the lowest literacy and one of the highest infant mortality rates in the world when Soviet influence began. They did build roads and begin the introduction of modernity in ways of essential infrastructure, health and education. It was a secular government, imperfect as it may have been.

    It’s all very well for people living in the first world to talk about not wanting outside influence but it makes no sense when living in a pitiful and backwards state. Compare muslim Afghanistan to what was pre-war muslim Iraq, Syria or Pakistan next door.

    You say there was lots of grass roots opposition as well as the warlords and tribal leaders but we both know it was the CIA that stirred up the poo. Who knows what might have been had they been left alone and post-collapse Soviet Union they would have had independence anyway and all that remained. Look at the mess it is now.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey NtD,

    One can definitely disagree on whether they like the outcome or not - depends on their priorities. Afghanistan was no doubt a very illiterate and poor country. Again, the process of modernization is at issue here - not necessarily the goal. All European empires came into the Muslim world with one or another version of the "White Man's Burden" and all of them were fought. You just don't do that in Muslim lands, intervening non-Muslim armies will be fought no matter what their stated goals.

    If they want to be altruistic, they have to help those people get on their feet on their own terms and in a way that jives with and does not threaten their local culture. I can tell you right now, as a man who has no problem sending his daughter for a college education; I would still have picked up a rifle and started shooting at armed Russian invaders supporting a Communist regime had I lived in Afghanistan - especially had I heard about what the Communists did to the faith of the people of places like Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, etc. One must see it from the frame of mind of those that are religious and traditionally minded (as Mr. Roy is able to do) like so many of the Afghans. Though it is great to be able to combine success in spirit and material - loss of material doesn't bother us as much as loss of faith - it is better to remain in faith and be half-starving in Somalia than to lose one's faith while living in the material opulence of Sweden (and the Swedes have unfortunately lost practically all of their faith)"
    “By Allah, I do not fear poverty for you, but rather I fear you will be given the wealth of the world just as it was given to those before you. You will compete for it just as they competed for it and it will destroy you just as it destroyed them.” - reported in Bukhari and Muslim

    The CIA did indeed come to stir the poo as they loved to do in South America and other places, but I can assure you, the poo was already boiling before they came with ladle in hand.

    Peace.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    Isn't it a bit hypocritical to want to keep one's traditional white Christian culture and at the same time insist that Muslims abandon their traditional culture.. in their own countries, too?

    Yes…yes it is.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • […] L’article original a été publié sur The Unz Review […]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The Russian special police just averted a rather big terror act, arrested a bunch of Tajiks and someone from Moldova (interestingly enough). Must have been organized either as revenge for Aleppo or for the New Year’s. Altogether this year 42 potential terror attacks have been averted. Don’t be surprised if something happens.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Isn’t it a bit hypocritical to want to keep one’s traditional white Christian culture and at the same time insist that Muslims abandon their traditional culture.. in their own countries, too?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Yes...yes it is.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    Chechnya is mostly surrounded by Russian federal territories. A siege on it coupled with bombing valleys with crops would eliminate most of them. The rest in the mountains can be mopped up with search and destroy missions, and by drawing them out of the mountains and into the valleys to trap them like a roach motel.

    It would work like clockwork.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    "2. Increase prohibition of technology transfer to Russia (which has none of it’s own even in oil resource exploitation )."

    How does this jive with Tillerson's Exxon - Rosneft 500 billion dollar oil contract? Or did you just pull this out of your heinie?

    The Russians have a huge country with oil and shale, and customers for all the oil and gas they can deliver, so what do they need Exxon for? Tillerson’s appointment is intended to signal to Saudi Arabia with snow, ie Russia ,that they can get all sorts of technology if they play ball.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_C._Sutton
    In a few words: there is no such thing as Soviet technology. Almost all — perhaps 90–95 percent — came directly or indirectly from the United States and its allies. In effect the United States and the NATO countries have built the Soviet Union. Its industrial and its military capabilities. This massive construction job has taken 50 years. Since the Revolution in 1917. It has been carried out through trade and the sale of plants, equipment and technical assistance.[4]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    Yes, I wouldn't appreciate another country trying to forcibly alter our society, even if it's a laudable goal on its face. Also beware unintended consequences: the British "modernized" India in some ways, but created a whole host of other problems, like overpopulation and immigration.

    {Yes, I wouldn’t appreciate another country trying to forcibly alter our society,}

    Agree.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey NtD,

    Yes, the Soviets were doing that stuff. The Americans were also building schools and such to win hearts and minds. It reminds me of a conversation that the invading French held with some tribal elders in Algeria.
    "According to one history book, when an Algerian elderly was told that the French armies were sent to spread Western civilization, his reaction was brief, stern, and direct. If that was truly the case, he observed, why did they bring so much gunpowder with them."
    http://decolonialtranslation.com/english/gunpowdermissiriENG.html

    If the Russians simply wanted to volunteer to build roads out of mere altruism, nobody would have objected. But they came in to support a Communist government which was trying to make sweeping reforms that were seen as very hostile to a traditional, religious people:
    "The prime cause of the uprisings was the authoritarian way in which the new regime imposed its reforms a few months after the coup of 27 April 1978...To achieve this they adopted three means: repression, made possible by the existence of a loyal and well-equipped army; agrarian reform which, they thought, would win the support of the mass of the people; and the elimination of illiteracy, in order to rescue the people from the influence of the clergy and to spread the new ideology."
    https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/islam-and-resistance-in-afghanistan/the-communist-reforms-and-the-repression-19789/02A5B5E3181BFE5B9C3AFFF8DE93962F

    The resistance was beyond just tribal leaders and war lords. It was down to the average Afghan. There is no problem with modernizing* Afghanistan - but it must be done on their terms; if one wants to introduce co-education of the sexes and indoctrination of Dialectic Materialism then it will be resisted.

    Again, please read Oliver Roy's book if you get a chance. Despite slight mistakes, he really gets one into the shoes of a Muslim culture to understand why these changes were not welcome.


    medieval minded
     
    Were it only so. 'Medieval' is a pejorative in European cultures due to their experience - this is quite understandable. It is not the case with Muslims. The vast majority of the scholars I quote from are indeed medieval scholars; their depth of understanding and humanity is something that is deplorably lacking in modern-day Muslims. Mr. Roy describes the curriculum that the senior Afghan ulema had to go through, based on the (yes, medieval) Nizami system:
    "The curriculum, which could take ten years to complete, comprised 106 books having to do with theology (according to the Ashari doctrine), the commentary on the Qur'an, the Hanafite fiqh, and the hadith, and also included Arabic and Persian grammar, literature, Greek and Arab philosophy, astronomy and medieval geometry, the branch of medicine known as 'Greek' (yunani) and logic."

    *Modernization is not simply neutral. I highly recommend Neil Postman's 'Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology' in understanding that introduction of technology into a society fundamentally changes its foundational framework:
    https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/1511641-technopoly-the-surrender-of-culture-to-technology

    Yes, I wouldn’t appreciate another country trying to forcibly alter our society, even if it’s a laudable goal on its face. Also beware unintended consequences: the British “modernized” India in some ways, but created a whole host of other problems, like overpopulation and immigration.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {Yes, I wouldn’t appreciate another country trying to forcibly alter our society,}

    Agree.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @NoseytheDuke
    It seems to me that the Soviets were building roads, hospitals and universities in Afghanistan. Women were becoming doctors, architects and lawyers etc and naturally those who had benefitted from the old system of warlords and tribal leaders were threatened by the move towards modernity and their subsequent loss of power.

    Much like the Luddites who tried to sabotage the industrialisation of Britain, progress would have swept them aside in time and Afghans in general would have enjoyed more of the fruits of modern life. It was Zbigniew Brzezinski's grand plan to arm the medieval minded mujahideen and create a Vietnam-like defeat for the Soviets and what a giant cock-up his 'brilliant' plan turned out to be.

    Hey NtD,

    Yes, the Soviets were doing that stuff. The Americans were also building schools and such to win hearts and minds. It reminds me of a conversation that the invading French held with some tribal elders in Algeria.
    “According to one history book, when an Algerian elderly was told that the French armies were sent to spread Western civilization, his reaction was brief, stern, and direct. If that was truly the case, he observed, why did they bring so much gunpowder with them.”

    http://decolonialtranslation.com/english/gunpowdermissiriENG.html

    If the Russians simply wanted to volunteer to build roads out of mere altruism, nobody would have objected. But they came in to support a Communist government which was trying to make sweeping reforms that were seen as very hostile to a traditional, religious people:
    “The prime cause of the uprisings was the authoritarian way in which the new regime imposed its reforms a few months after the coup of 27 April 1978…To achieve this they adopted three means: repression, made possible by the existence of a loyal and well-equipped army; agrarian reform which, they thought, would win the support of the mass of the people; and the elimination of illiteracy, in order to rescue the people from the influence of the clergy and to spread the new ideology.”

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/islam-and-resistance-in-afghanistan/the-communist-reforms-and-the-repression-19789/02A5B5E3181BFE5B9C3AFFF8DE93962F

    The resistance was beyond just tribal leaders and war lords. It was down to the average Afghan. There is no problem with modernizing* Afghanistan – but it must be done on their terms; if one wants to introduce co-education of the sexes and indoctrination of Dialectic Materialism then it will be resisted.

    Again, please read Oliver Roy’s book if you get a chance. Despite slight mistakes, he really gets one into the shoes of a Muslim culture to understand why these changes were not welcome.

    medieval minded

    Were it only so. ‘Medieval’ is a pejorative in European cultures due to their experience – this is quite understandable. It is not the case with Muslims. The vast majority of the scholars I quote from are indeed medieval scholars; their depth of understanding and humanity is something that is deplorably lacking in modern-day Muslims. Mr. Roy describes the curriculum that the senior Afghan ulema had to go through, based on the (yes, medieval) Nizami system:
    “The curriculum, which could take ten years to complete, comprised 106 books having to do with theology (according to the Ashari doctrine), the commentary on the Qur’an, the Hanafite fiqh, and the hadith, and also included Arabic and Persian grammar, literature, Greek and Arab philosophy, astronomy and medieval geometry, the branch of medicine known as ‘Greek’ (yunani) and logic.”

    *Modernization is not simply neutral. I highly recommend Neil Postman’s ‘Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology’ in understanding that introduction of technology into a society fundamentally changes its foundational framework:

    https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/1511641-technopoly-the-surrender-of-culture-to-technology

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    Yes, I wouldn't appreciate another country trying to forcibly alter our society, even if it's a laudable goal on its face. Also beware unintended consequences: the British "modernized" India in some ways, but created a whole host of other problems, like overpopulation and immigration.
    , @NoseytheDuke
    We'll have to disagree. Of course the Soviets had their own interests, Afghanistan is strategically located. Afghans were among the poorest people with the lowest literacy and one of the highest infant mortality rates in the world when Soviet influence began. They did build roads and begin the introduction of modernity in ways of essential infrastructure, health and education. It was a secular government, imperfect as it may have been.

    It's all very well for people living in the first world to talk about not wanting outside influence but it makes no sense when living in a pitiful and backwards state. Compare muslim Afghanistan to what was pre-war muslim Iraq, Syria or Pakistan next door.

    You say there was lots of grass roots opposition as well as the warlords and tribal leaders but we both know it was the CIA that stirred up the poo. Who knows what might have been had they been left alone and post-collapse Soviet Union they would have had independence anyway and all that remained. Look at the mess it is now.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Dear Nephew,

    Russia is helping to uphold international law against an ILLEGAL proxy war against Syria
     
    Completely correct. I didn't like Saddam at all, but I participated in the demonstrations against his violent removal. As to the details of Russia's participation; they do not exhibit necessary caution with their concentration of firepower in civilian areas (and that has been the case historically). Are they better than, say, the Chinese? Sure.

    The Afghan War started due to an internal military coup by Communists (dubbed the 'Saur Revolution'). Their introduction of radical modernization into a traditional society like Afghanistan was deemed a threat to the people - by the people. The Soviets invaded to help prop up that government against instability.
    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/asia-july-dec06-soviet_10-10/
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/analysis/83854.stm

    That was seen as an invasion to prop up a military takeover by communists. As I said before; I don't know of a single scholar or institution that did not deem it a legitimate jihad; including those that were Sufis, Salafis or anybody in between. And yes, Muslims from all around the world poured in to help them - as was their right upon us - and, no, they weren't all fanatics.

    Peace.

    It seems to me that the Soviets were building roads, hospitals and universities in Afghanistan. Women were becoming doctors, architects and lawyers etc and naturally those who had benefitted from the old system of warlords and tribal leaders were threatened by the move towards modernity and their subsequent loss of power.

    Much like the Luddites who tried to sabotage the industrialisation of Britain, progress would have swept them aside in time and Afghans in general would have enjoyed more of the fruits of modern life. It was Zbigniew Brzezinski’s grand plan to arm the medieval minded mujahideen and create a Vietnam-like defeat for the Soviets and what a giant cock-up his ‘brilliant’ plan turned out to be.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey NtD,

    Yes, the Soviets were doing that stuff. The Americans were also building schools and such to win hearts and minds. It reminds me of a conversation that the invading French held with some tribal elders in Algeria.
    "According to one history book, when an Algerian elderly was told that the French armies were sent to spread Western civilization, his reaction was brief, stern, and direct. If that was truly the case, he observed, why did they bring so much gunpowder with them."
    http://decolonialtranslation.com/english/gunpowdermissiriENG.html

    If the Russians simply wanted to volunteer to build roads out of mere altruism, nobody would have objected. But they came in to support a Communist government which was trying to make sweeping reforms that were seen as very hostile to a traditional, religious people:
    "The prime cause of the uprisings was the authoritarian way in which the new regime imposed its reforms a few months after the coup of 27 April 1978...To achieve this they adopted three means: repression, made possible by the existence of a loyal and well-equipped army; agrarian reform which, they thought, would win the support of the mass of the people; and the elimination of illiteracy, in order to rescue the people from the influence of the clergy and to spread the new ideology."
    https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/islam-and-resistance-in-afghanistan/the-communist-reforms-and-the-repression-19789/02A5B5E3181BFE5B9C3AFFF8DE93962F

    The resistance was beyond just tribal leaders and war lords. It was down to the average Afghan. There is no problem with modernizing* Afghanistan - but it must be done on their terms; if one wants to introduce co-education of the sexes and indoctrination of Dialectic Materialism then it will be resisted.

    Again, please read Oliver Roy's book if you get a chance. Despite slight mistakes, he really gets one into the shoes of a Muslim culture to understand why these changes were not welcome.


    medieval minded
     
    Were it only so. 'Medieval' is a pejorative in European cultures due to their experience - this is quite understandable. It is not the case with Muslims. The vast majority of the scholars I quote from are indeed medieval scholars; their depth of understanding and humanity is something that is deplorably lacking in modern-day Muslims. Mr. Roy describes the curriculum that the senior Afghan ulema had to go through, based on the (yes, medieval) Nizami system:
    "The curriculum, which could take ten years to complete, comprised 106 books having to do with theology (according to the Ashari doctrine), the commentary on the Qur'an, the Hanafite fiqh, and the hadith, and also included Arabic and Persian grammar, literature, Greek and Arab philosophy, astronomy and medieval geometry, the branch of medicine known as 'Greek' (yunani) and logic."

    *Modernization is not simply neutral. I highly recommend Neil Postman's 'Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology' in understanding that introduction of technology into a society fundamentally changes its foundational framework:
    https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/1511641-technopoly-the-surrender-of-culture-to-technology

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    The British guarantee to Poland in 1939 was initially to cover its independence only, but when the Nazi Soviet pact was announced the British gave a guarantee of Poland's territory, making war all but inevitable.

    Russia's job in the New World Order is to fight China. But they are getting pally, and to teach the Ruskies that them making a one with China is not acceptable you will see Trump do the following things.
    1. Cut off technology transfers to China
    2. Increase prohibition of technology transfer to Russia (which has none of it's own even in oil resource exploitation ).
    3. Demonstrate to the Russians that their planes are pathetically vulnerable to US weapons in the hands of people without underwear, though this is not perhaps so surprising, because Russian soldiers had no socks until relatively recently.

    “2. Increase prohibition of technology transfer to Russia (which has none of it’s own even in oil resource exploitation ).”

    How does this jive with Tillerson’s Exxon – Rosneft 500 billion dollar oil contract? Or did you just pull this out of your heinie?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    The Russians have a huge country with oil and shale, and customers for all the oil and gas they can deliver, so what do they need Exxon for? Tillerson's appointment is intended to signal to Saudi Arabia with snow, ie Russia ,that they can get all sorts of technology if they play ball.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_C._Sutton
    In a few words: there is no such thing as Soviet technology. Almost all — perhaps 90–95 percent — came directly or indirectly from the United States and its allies. In effect the United States and the NATO countries have built the Soviet Union. Its industrial and its military capabilities. This massive construction job has taken 50 years. Since the Revolution in 1917. It has been carried out through trade and the sale of plants, equipment and technical assistance.[4]
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Dear Nephew,

    Not that massive and indiscriminate use of firepower is something only Russia has done
     
    Of course not - that would be a silly claim. And I agree, the Russians are being more careful than in Chechnya - no doubt about that; just not careful enough for my taste.

    the instability did only ever become significant bc of the US and its Wahhabi allies
     
    Uh no - you are putting the cart before the horse. The resistance was already in motion well before the US and Wahhabis got involved and tried to co-opt it. Please read "Islam and Resistance in Afghanistan" by the brilliant Oliver Roy:
    https://www.amazon.com/Resistance-Afghanistan-Cambridge-Middle-Library/dp/0521397006

    Especially read the chapter titled: "The communist reforms and the repression"

    There was not a chance in hell that a Communist government would simply take over without fierce resistance to it. A resistance whose roots lie in the influence of Scholar-Sufis like Shah Waliullah (ra) threading through the institution of Deoband and its seminaries in the North Western Frontier area of Pakistan - most of the senior Afghan ulema having been graduates of that system. Mr. Roy points out the integral part that the Sufi brotherhoods played in the resistance and organization of the tribes.

    Peace.

    Yes and the US didn’t necessarily want weaponry to go to people like Hekmatyar, but Pakistan ruled by the thuggish Zia regime was the “middleman.” Still the avg rebel was not a salafist, and the Soviet regime was genuinely unpopular in most areas, as evidenced by massive desertions. Despite lacking any cause that would boost morale, the avg Soviet soldier was a redoubtable enemy by all accounts, bin Laden even said “the Russian soldier is more courageous [than the American].”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @L.K
    Dear uncle Talha,

    "As to the details of Russia’s participation; they do not exhibit necessary caution with their concentration of firepower in civilian areas (and that has been the case historically)."

    Huh? Nonsense. I'll concede that Russia did not 'exhibit necessary caution with their concentration of firepower in civilian areas' in past wars, for example in Chechnya.
    Not that massive and indiscriminate use of firepower is something only Russia has done as one can easily see by observing Zusa's military in action.

    But in Syria? No Way! In fact, in Syria, the Russians have been too cautious in their use of firepower, which has IMO prolonged the fighting in Aleppo, for instance... which has resulted in a lot of civilian casualties in the heavily populated districts controlled by the government.
    After all, there was 1.3 million people in the government areas, routinely shelled by the US backed takfiri savages. In East Aleppo, there were perhaps 50,000 civilians who were then transformed into 250,000 by the lying msm presstitutes.
    Many of them wanted to get out to the government areas but were prevented from doing so by the militants, who many times shot at or shelled the escape routes that were set up.

    Finally though, Aleppo is nearly totally pest/rat free. The last pockets of rodents are being reduced as I write these lines! Good riddance with bad trash!
    ANNA NEWS ALEPPO almost totally liberated from ZUSA'S backed jihadi scum
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EjpnQ9FmC8

    Uncle Talha:'The Soviets invaded to help prop up that government against instability'

    Hmmm.... yeah, but the instability did only ever become significant bc of the US and its Wahhabi allies massively backing/funding the jihadists.

    Dear Nephew,

    Not that massive and indiscriminate use of firepower is something only Russia has done

    Of course not – that would be a silly claim. And I agree, the Russians are being more careful than in Chechnya – no doubt about that; just not careful enough for my taste.

    the instability did only ever become significant bc of the US and its Wahhabi allies

    Uh no – you are putting the cart before the horse. The resistance was already in motion well before the US and Wahhabis got involved and tried to co-opt it. Please read “Islam and Resistance in Afghanistan” by the brilliant Oliver Roy:

    https://www.amazon.com/Resistance-Afghanistan-Cambridge-Middle-Library/dp/0521397006

    Especially read the chapter titled: “The communist reforms and the repression”

    There was not a chance in hell that a Communist government would simply take over without fierce resistance to it. A resistance whose roots lie in the influence of Scholar-Sufis like Shah Waliullah (ra) threading through the institution of Deoband and its seminaries in the North Western Frontier area of Pakistan – most of the senior Afghan ulema having been graduates of that system. Mr. Roy points out the integral part that the Sufi brotherhoods played in the resistance and organization of the tribes.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    Yes and the US didn't necessarily want weaponry to go to people like Hekmatyar, but Pakistan ruled by the thuggish Zia regime was the "middleman." Still the avg rebel was not a salafist, and the Soviet regime was genuinely unpopular in most areas, as evidenced by massive desertions. Despite lacking any cause that would boost morale, the avg Soviet soldier was a redoubtable enemy by all accounts, bin Laden even said "the Russian soldier is more courageous [than the American]."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    The British guarantee to Poland in 1939 was initially to cover its independence only, but when the Nazi Soviet pact was announced the British gave a guarantee of Poland's territory, making war all but inevitable.

    Russia's job in the New World Order is to fight China. But they are getting pally, and to teach the Ruskies that them making a one with China is not acceptable you will see Trump do the following things.
    1. Cut off technology transfers to China
    2. Increase prohibition of technology transfer to Russia (which has none of it's own even in oil resource exploitation ).
    3. Demonstrate to the Russians that their planes are pathetically vulnerable to US weapons in the hands of people without underwear, though this is not perhaps so surprising, because Russian soldiers had no socks until relatively recently.

    Sean,
    You are a fantasist and a pathetic liar.

    Maybe ZUSA should cut off technology transfers to Russia, China…. buhahahaha
    Russia will be so hurt that it won’t be able to get the F-35!!
    THE F-35 IS A LEMON PIERRE SPREY

    You said something about the Chechens not being real soldiers, lacking skills and discipline, too old, etc…
    Let’s take a look at those ‘amateurs’, shall we?
    Russian-Chechen Special Forces

    Russian Army. Chechen armed forces

    Sean, gimme a unit of Chechen or any other first line Russian forces vs a similarly sized US army or even Marines unit, I’ll put my money on the chechen/russians any day of the week.

    You may want to take a look at ‘The March of the Porcelain Soldiers’, written by the (now deceased) highly decorated Colonel David Hackworth, a Korea and Vietnam veteran, re the state of affairs in the modern US infantry.
    It is funny as hell!
    :-)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    Yes, monasteries produced some great art and vital literature, but they were also a drain on resources and manpower in places that desperately needed those e.g. Byzantium. And they were inviting targets for plunderers of course.

    Indeed; gelded monks vs Vikings – not a very good match-up.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Dear Nephew,

    Russia is helping to uphold international law against an ILLEGAL proxy war against Syria
     
    Completely correct. I didn't like Saddam at all, but I participated in the demonstrations against his violent removal. As to the details of Russia's participation; they do not exhibit necessary caution with their concentration of firepower in civilian areas (and that has been the case historically). Are they better than, say, the Chinese? Sure.

    The Afghan War started due to an internal military coup by Communists (dubbed the 'Saur Revolution'). Their introduction of radical modernization into a traditional society like Afghanistan was deemed a threat to the people - by the people. The Soviets invaded to help prop up that government against instability.
    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/asia-july-dec06-soviet_10-10/
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/analysis/83854.stm

    That was seen as an invasion to prop up a military takeover by communists. As I said before; I don't know of a single scholar or institution that did not deem it a legitimate jihad; including those that were Sufis, Salafis or anybody in between. And yes, Muslims from all around the world poured in to help them - as was their right upon us - and, no, they weren't all fanatics.

    Peace.

    Dear uncle Talha,

    “As to the details of Russia’s participation; they do not exhibit necessary caution with their concentration of firepower in civilian areas (and that has been the case historically).”

    Huh? Nonsense. I’ll concede that Russia did not ‘exhibit necessary caution with their concentration of firepower in civilian areas’ in past wars, for example in Chechnya.
    Not that massive and indiscriminate use of firepower is something only Russia has done as one can easily see by observing Zusa’s military in action.

    But in Syria? No Way! In fact, in Syria, the Russians have been too cautious in their use of firepower, which has IMO prolonged the fighting in Aleppo, for instance… which has resulted in a lot of civilian casualties in the heavily populated districts controlled by the government.
    After all, there was 1.3 million people in the government areas, routinely shelled by the US backed takfiri savages. In East Aleppo, there were perhaps 50,000 civilians who were then transformed into 250,000 by the lying msm presstitutes.
    Many of them wanted to get out to the government areas but were prevented from doing so by the militants, who many times shot at or shelled the escape routes that were set up.

    Finally though, Aleppo is nearly totally pest/rat free. The last pockets of rodents are being reduced as I write these lines! Good riddance with bad trash!
    ANNA NEWS ALEPPO almost totally liberated from ZUSA’S backed jihadi scum

    Uncle Talha:’The Soviets invaded to help prop up that government against instability’

    Hmmm…. yeah, but the instability did only ever become significant bc of the US and its Wahhabi allies massively backing/funding the jihadists.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Dear Nephew,

    Not that massive and indiscriminate use of firepower is something only Russia has done
     
    Of course not - that would be a silly claim. And I agree, the Russians are being more careful than in Chechnya - no doubt about that; just not careful enough for my taste.

    the instability did only ever become significant bc of the US and its Wahhabi allies
     
    Uh no - you are putting the cart before the horse. The resistance was already in motion well before the US and Wahhabis got involved and tried to co-opt it. Please read "Islam and Resistance in Afghanistan" by the brilliant Oliver Roy:
    https://www.amazon.com/Resistance-Afghanistan-Cambridge-Middle-Library/dp/0521397006

    Especially read the chapter titled: "The communist reforms and the repression"

    There was not a chance in hell that a Communist government would simply take over without fierce resistance to it. A resistance whose roots lie in the influence of Scholar-Sufis like Shah Waliullah (ra) threading through the institution of Deoband and its seminaries in the North Western Frontier area of Pakistan - most of the senior Afghan ulema having been graduates of that system. Mr. Roy points out the integral part that the Sufi brotherhoods played in the resistance and organization of the tribes.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    The British guarantee to Poland in 1939 was initially to cover its independence only, but when the Nazi Soviet pact was announced the British gave a guarantee of Poland's territory, making war all but inevitable.

    Russia's job in the New World Order is to fight China. But they are getting pally, and to teach the Ruskies that them making a one with China is not acceptable you will see Trump do the following things.
    1. Cut off technology transfers to China
    2. Increase prohibition of technology transfer to Russia (which has none of it's own even in oil resource exploitation ).
    3. Demonstrate to the Russians that their planes are pathetically vulnerable to US weapons in the hands of people without underwear, though this is not perhaps so surprising, because Russian soldiers had no socks until relatively recently.

    their planes are pathetically vulnerable to US weapons in the hands of people without underwear

    You can teach goat herders to use stingers and other MANPADS systems which are deadly to helicopters and older planes. But for the newer planes, you need stuff like S-300 and S-400 or other complicated anti-aircraft systems. Very difficult to train them in using those.

    You could give them a fully working nuclear ICBM and they wouldn’t benefit from it other than increasing their chances of getting cancer.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey Sean,

    The Saudis are a lot of things - honestly, who cares what they say. They do a hell of a lot of posturing. If they cared a whit about Arabs, they wouldn't be bombing Yemen to pieces.


    Strong as the US is, it cannot afford to let the Russians keep going and show the world that Russia counts for more than the US.
     
    The US counts for more than Russia without any military interference - this is a question of economic influence and pure statistics - people listen to Kanye West in S. Korea. But this is a self-fulfilling prophecy; the more the US pushes and bullies, the more it will turn people to other spheres of influence; Pakistan is a case study on this question.

    The only thing that will stop the Russians in Syria is their planes being shot out of the sky.
     
    I will ask a similar question I asked on another thread; please list (at least) 25 US cities (in order of preference) that you want turned into radioactive dust in order to safe-guard the sovereignty of Muslim extremists in Eastern Syria.

    Peace.

    The British guarantee to Poland in 1939 was initially to cover its independence only, but when the Nazi Soviet pact was announced the British gave a guarantee of Poland’s territory, making war all but inevitable.

    Russia’s job in the New World Order is to fight China. But they are getting pally, and to teach the Ruskies that them making a one with China is not acceptable you will see Trump do the following things.
    1. Cut off technology transfers to China
    2. Increase prohibition of technology transfer to Russia (which has none of it’s own even in oil resource exploitation ).
    3. Demonstrate to the Russians that their planes are pathetically vulnerable to US weapons in the hands of people without underwear, though this is not perhaps so surprising, because Russian soldiers had no socks until relatively recently.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha

    their planes are pathetically vulnerable to US weapons in the hands of people without underwear
     
    You can teach goat herders to use stingers and other MANPADS systems which are deadly to helicopters and older planes. But for the newer planes, you need stuff like S-300 and S-400 or other complicated anti-aircraft systems. Very difficult to train them in using those.

    You could give them a fully working nuclear ICBM and they wouldn't benefit from it other than increasing their chances of getting cancer.

    Peace.

    , @L.K
    Sean,
    You are a fantasist and a pathetic liar.

    Maybe ZUSA should cut off technology transfers to Russia, China.... buhahahaha
    Russia will be so hurt that it won't be able to get the F-35!!
    THE F-35 IS A LEMON PIERRE SPREY
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxDSiwqM2nw

    You said something about the Chechens not being real soldiers, lacking skills and discipline, too old, etc...
    Let's take a look at those 'amateurs', shall we?
    Russian-Chechen Special Forces
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDGsS_vMmZ0
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxGFhZCFMS0
    Russian Army. Chechen armed forces
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgzFw7ZznRM

    Sean, gimme a unit of Chechen or any other first line Russian forces vs a similarly sized US army or even Marines unit, I'll put my money on the chechen/russians any day of the week.

    You may want to take a look at 'The March of the Porcelain Soldiers', written by the (now deceased) highly decorated Colonel David Hackworth, a Korea and Vietnam veteran, re the state of affairs in the modern US infantry.
    It is funny as hell!
    :-)
    , @Anonymous
    "2. Increase prohibition of technology transfer to Russia (which has none of it’s own even in oil resource exploitation )."

    How does this jive with Tillerson's Exxon - Rosneft 500 billion dollar oil contract? Or did you just pull this out of your heinie?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey Marcus,

    The indigenous peoples gave a pretty stout resistance to the Arabs.
     
    Darn right - they're Afghans! But Islam came to be accepted by them as it was by the Chechens - at the hands of the Sufis. Kandahar is named after Alexander the Great, from what I recall.

    so closely tied to monasticism
     
    Doh! Not very fit from a selective advantage viewpoint - even if left completely alone, it will end up destroying itself.

    Peace.

    Yes, monasteries produced some great art and vital literature, but they were also a drain on resources and manpower in places that desperately needed those e.g. Byzantium. And they were inviting targets for plunderers of course.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Indeed; gelded monks vs Vikings - not a very good match-up.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @5371
    You get your knowledge of history from Hollywood. LMAO

    You’re scared of seeing Russians get blown out of the sky. Hence your nervous laughter.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    The indigenous peoples gave a pretty stout resistance to the Arabs. It's believed the Kafirstanis' indigenous faith survived into the 20th century. Kandahar = Gandhara (or maybe Alexandria). Interesting to note that the notion of a real division between "Buddhism" and "Hinduism" is fairly modern. Muslim writers referred to Buddhist monks as "clean-shaven Brahmans." It is true that Indian "Buddhism" was not durable compared to other traditions since it was so closely tied to monasticism.
    rajivmalhotra.com/library/articles/gandhara-became-kandahar/

    Hey Marcus,

    The indigenous peoples gave a pretty stout resistance to the Arabs.

    Darn right – they’re Afghans! But Islam came to be accepted by them as it was by the Chechens – at the hands of the Sufis. Kandahar is named after Alexander the Great, from what I recall.

    so closely tied to monasticism

    Doh! Not very fit from a selective advantage viewpoint – even if left completely alone, it will end up destroying itself.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    Yes, monasteries produced some great art and vital literature, but they were also a drain on resources and manpower in places that desperately needed those e.g. Byzantium. And they were inviting targets for plunderers of course.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Was...then the Sufis came - I'm not even going to provide a reference since cities like Herat, Kandahar, Balkh, etc. have been major spiritual centers for centuries.

    restore Gandhara
     
    You can try - I don't think Buddhists want to tango with Afghans.

    Peace.

    The indigenous peoples gave a pretty stout resistance to the Arabs. It’s believed the Kafirstanis’ indigenous faith survived into the 20th century. Kandahar = Gandhara (or maybe Alexandria). Interesting to note that the notion of a real division between “Buddhism” and “Hinduism” is fairly modern. Muslim writers referred to Buddhist monks as “clean-shaven Brahmans.” It is true that Indian “Buddhism” was not durable compared to other traditions since it was so closely tied to monasticism.
    rajivmalhotra.com/library/articles/gandhara-became-kandahar/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Marcus,

    The indigenous peoples gave a pretty stout resistance to the Arabs.
     
    Darn right - they're Afghans! But Islam came to be accepted by them as it was by the Chechens - at the hands of the Sufis. Kandahar is named after Alexander the Great, from what I recall.

    so closely tied to monasticism
     
    Doh! Not very fit from a selective advantage viewpoint - even if left completely alone, it will end up destroying itself.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    "Afghanistan" is Hindu-Buddhist by right, restore Gandhara!

    Was…then the Sufis came – I’m not even going to provide a reference since cities like Herat, Kandahar, Balkh, etc. have been major spiritual centers for centuries.

    restore Gandhara

    You can try – I don’t think Buddhists want to tango with Afghans.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    The indigenous peoples gave a pretty stout resistance to the Arabs. It's believed the Kafirstanis' indigenous faith survived into the 20th century. Kandahar = Gandhara (or maybe Alexandria). Interesting to note that the notion of a real division between "Buddhism" and "Hinduism" is fairly modern. Muslim writers referred to Buddhist monks as "clean-shaven Brahmans." It is true that Indian "Buddhism" was not durable compared to other traditions since it was so closely tied to monasticism.
    rajivmalhotra.com/library/articles/gandhara-became-kandahar/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Dear Nephew,

    Russia is helping to uphold international law against an ILLEGAL proxy war against Syria
     
    Completely correct. I didn't like Saddam at all, but I participated in the demonstrations against his violent removal. As to the details of Russia's participation; they do not exhibit necessary caution with their concentration of firepower in civilian areas (and that has been the case historically). Are they better than, say, the Chinese? Sure.

    The Afghan War started due to an internal military coup by Communists (dubbed the 'Saur Revolution'). Their introduction of radical modernization into a traditional society like Afghanistan was deemed a threat to the people - by the people. The Soviets invaded to help prop up that government against instability.
    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/asia-july-dec06-soviet_10-10/
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/analysis/83854.stm

    That was seen as an invasion to prop up a military takeover by communists. As I said before; I don't know of a single scholar or institution that did not deem it a legitimate jihad; including those that were Sufis, Salafis or anybody in between. And yes, Muslims from all around the world poured in to help them - as was their right upon us - and, no, they weren't all fanatics.

    Peace.

    “Afghanistan” is Hindu-Buddhist by right, restore Gandhara!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Was...then the Sufis came - I'm not even going to provide a reference since cities like Herat, Kandahar, Balkh, etc. have been major spiritual centers for centuries.

    restore Gandhara
     
    You can try - I don't think Buddhists want to tango with Afghans.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @L.K
    "I don’t like what Russia is doing in Syria to be honest, because I don’t like the Assad government any further than I can throw them. The problem is that their opposition is even worse in their conduct and morals so I certainly can’t support them. I just want an end to the fighting – way too many innocents have lost their lives."


    It is for comments such as this one, that you have deservedly earned the moniker 'uncle' talha.

    I, on the other hand, like very much what Russia is doing in Syria.

    Simply put, Russia is helping to uphold international law against an ILLEGAL proxy war against Syria, a war which, if successful, would have meant yet another client or failed state for the zio-us empire... and one which could be used to further destabilize the region and perhaps the Russian Caucasus too.

    As for the Soviet-Afghan war, it would not have happenned had Zusa & allies not armed Salafist fanatics and mercenaries in Afghanistan, ever thought of that?

    Dear Nephew,

    Russia is helping to uphold international law against an ILLEGAL proxy war against Syria

    Completely correct. I didn’t like Saddam at all, but I participated in the demonstrations against his violent removal. As to the details of Russia’s participation; they do not exhibit necessary caution with their concentration of firepower in civilian areas (and that has been the case historically). Are they better than, say, the Chinese? Sure.

    The Afghan War started due to an internal military coup by Communists (dubbed the ‘Saur Revolution’). Their introduction of radical modernization into a traditional society like Afghanistan was deemed a threat to the people – by the people. The Soviets invaded to help prop up that government against instability.

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/asia-july-dec06-soviet_10-10/

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/analysis/83854.stm

    That was seen as an invasion to prop up a military takeover by communists. As I said before; I don’t know of a single scholar or institution that did not deem it a legitimate jihad; including those that were Sufis, Salafis or anybody in between. And yes, Muslims from all around the world poured in to help them – as was their right upon us – and, no, they weren’t all fanatics.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    "Afghanistan" is Hindu-Buddhist by right, restore Gandhara!
    , @L.K
    Dear uncle Talha,

    "As to the details of Russia’s participation; they do not exhibit necessary caution with their concentration of firepower in civilian areas (and that has been the case historically)."

    Huh? Nonsense. I'll concede that Russia did not 'exhibit necessary caution with their concentration of firepower in civilian areas' in past wars, for example in Chechnya.
    Not that massive and indiscriminate use of firepower is something only Russia has done as one can easily see by observing Zusa's military in action.

    But in Syria? No Way! In fact, in Syria, the Russians have been too cautious in their use of firepower, which has IMO prolonged the fighting in Aleppo, for instance... which has resulted in a lot of civilian casualties in the heavily populated districts controlled by the government.
    After all, there was 1.3 million people in the government areas, routinely shelled by the US backed takfiri savages. In East Aleppo, there were perhaps 50,000 civilians who were then transformed into 250,000 by the lying msm presstitutes.
    Many of them wanted to get out to the government areas but were prevented from doing so by the militants, who many times shot at or shelled the escape routes that were set up.

    Finally though, Aleppo is nearly totally pest/rat free. The last pockets of rodents are being reduced as I write these lines! Good riddance with bad trash!
    ANNA NEWS ALEPPO almost totally liberated from ZUSA'S backed jihadi scum
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EjpnQ9FmC8

    Uncle Talha:'The Soviets invaded to help prop up that government against instability'

    Hmmm.... yeah, but the instability did only ever become significant bc of the US and its Wahhabi allies massively backing/funding the jihadists.
    , @NoseytheDuke
    It seems to me that the Soviets were building roads, hospitals and universities in Afghanistan. Women were becoming doctors, architects and lawyers etc and naturally those who had benefitted from the old system of warlords and tribal leaders were threatened by the move towards modernity and their subsequent loss of power.

    Much like the Luddites who tried to sabotage the industrialisation of Britain, progress would have swept them aside in time and Afghans in general would have enjoyed more of the fruits of modern life. It was Zbigniew Brzezinski's grand plan to arm the medieval minded mujahideen and create a Vietnam-like defeat for the Soviets and what a giant cock-up his 'brilliant' plan turned out to be.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @NoseytheDuke
    You appear to have an inclination towards the writing of fiction, if not the talent.

    Yes,

    Sean’s ridiculous posts are indeed pure fantasy, look at this troll’s description of the war in Iraq!!!

    He’s probably a failed Hollywood script writer…. and it’s pretty damn hard to find even one hollywood movie these days with a reasonably well written script! haha

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hola Senor,

    1) I'm not a chick - my name comes from a man dubbed the 'Falcon of Uhud':
    "Talhah distinguished himself at the Battle of Uhud by keeping close to Muhammad while most of the Muslim army fled. He protected Muhammad's face from an arrow by taking the shot in his own hand, as a result of which two of his fingers were paralyzed. He was also hit twice in the head, and it was said that he suffered a total of 75 wounds in the battle."
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talhah

    2) I don't like what Russia is doing in Syria to be honest, because I don't like the Assad government any further than I can throw them. The problem is that their opposition is even worse in their conduct and morals so I certainly can't support them. I just want an end to the fighting - way too many innocents have lost their lives.

    Read comment #38 if you think I have a love affair with anything Russia does.

    Peace. By the way, who gave you access to a keyboard?

    Whoops, there I go again, taking an anonymous post far more seriously than I should. I'm guessing the more common/perfunctory response is probably along the lines of:
    **** you ***hole, eat **** and die!

    “I don’t like what Russia is doing in Syria to be honest, because I don’t like the Assad government any further than I can throw them. The problem is that their opposition is even worse in their conduct and morals so I certainly can’t support them. I just want an end to the fighting – way too many innocents have lost their lives.”

    It is for comments such as this one, that you have deservedly earned the moniker ‘uncle’ talha.

    I, on the other hand, like very much what Russia is doing in Syria.

    Simply put, Russia is helping to uphold international law against an ILLEGAL proxy war against Syria, a war which, if successful, would have meant yet another client or failed state for the zio-us empire… and one which could be used to further destabilize the region and perhaps the Russian Caucasus too.

    As for the Soviet-Afghan war, it would not have happenned had Zusa & allies not armed Salafist fanatics and mercenaries in Afghanistan, ever thought of that?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Dear Nephew,

    Russia is helping to uphold international law against an ILLEGAL proxy war against Syria
     
    Completely correct. I didn't like Saddam at all, but I participated in the demonstrations against his violent removal. As to the details of Russia's participation; they do not exhibit necessary caution with their concentration of firepower in civilian areas (and that has been the case historically). Are they better than, say, the Chinese? Sure.

    The Afghan War started due to an internal military coup by Communists (dubbed the 'Saur Revolution'). Their introduction of radical modernization into a traditional society like Afghanistan was deemed a threat to the people - by the people. The Soviets invaded to help prop up that government against instability.
    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/asia-july-dec06-soviet_10-10/
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/analysis/83854.stm

    That was seen as an invasion to prop up a military takeover by communists. As I said before; I don't know of a single scholar or institution that did not deem it a legitimate jihad; including those that were Sufis, Salafis or anybody in between. And yes, Muslims from all around the world poured in to help them - as was their right upon us - and, no, they weren't all fanatics.

    Peace.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @5371
    No, from long experience I can assure you that he really is this stupid.
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Fredrik
    Yes,
    but the reason is that the population in both Iran and Russia is not behind its leadership.

    If the population of Russia is not behind its leadership why does its president consistently poll at 80+% approval ratings?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Fredrik
    Yes,
    but the reason is that the population in both Iran and Russia is not behind its leadership.

    {but the reason is that the population in both Iran and Russia is not behind its leadership.}

    Obviously, you are either completely clueless about Iran and Russia, or are spreading anti-Russia and anti-Iran disinformation.

    Putin popularity rating has not been below 60% since he ran for office.
    In 2016 it is 80%+.
    Highest 89%
    Lowest 60%+.

    And Rouhani won the 2013 IRI Presidential election 50.88% to 16.46%.
    Turnout was a very healthy 72%.

    In comparison, US POTUS election of 2016 had a turnout of 55%.

    Highest Obama approval 70%.
    Lowest Obama approval 40%.
    2016 US Congress approval rating ~15%.

    You have no clue about anything homes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    "primitive Russian airplanes."
    You can't really be this stupid. What does NATO have that matches the SU-34 or SU-35?? Maybe the F-22. And the TA-50 will be the premier fifth generation fighter.

    No, from long experience I can assure you that he really is this stupid.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    *this takes a more pessimistic view of the T-50
    http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russias-pak-fa-stealth-fighter-the-us-air-forces-worst-16991
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    Right, anti-aircraft weapons are the decisive weapons, and they haven't been supplied to the rebels. They were what defeated the Soviets in Afghanistan.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WmDszVxti0

    You get your knowledge of history from Hollywood. LMAO

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    You're scared of seeing Russians get blown out of the sky. Hence your nervous laughter.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    The US has no stake in that situation, period. Saudi, Israel, and Turkey who back the rebels are much worse enemies than Iran or Russia. You'll find that anti-US sentiment is much higher in Saudi and Turkey than it is Iran or Russia.

    Yes,
    but the reason is that the population in both Iran and Russia is not behind its leadership.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {but the reason is that the population in both Iran and Russia is not behind its leadership.}

    Obviously, you are either completely clueless about Iran and Russia, or are spreading anti-Russia and anti-Iran disinformation.

    Putin popularity rating has not been below 60% since he ran for office.
    In 2016 it is 80%+.
    Highest 89%
    Lowest 60%+.

    And Rouhani won the 2013 IRI Presidential election 50.88% to 16.46%.
    Turnout was a very healthy 72%.

    In comparison, US POTUS election of 2016 had a turnout of 55%.

    Highest Obama approval 70%.
    Lowest Obama approval 40%.
    2016 US Congress approval rating ~15%.


    You have no clue about anything homes.
    , @JL
    If the population of Russia is not behind its leadership why does its president consistently poll at 80+% approval ratings?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    Why does a Pakistani Sunni chick like you spread your ass cheeks for Russian sausage? You like Russian sausage that much?

    This is the sort of post that could really benefit from censorship- profanity-laden and content-free. Kudos to Talha for a polite response, though.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    Why does a Pakistani Sunni chick like you spread your ass cheeks for Russian sausage? You like Russian sausage that much?

    Hola Senor,

    1) I’m not a chick – my name comes from a man dubbed the ‘Falcon of Uhud’:
    “Talhah distinguished himself at the Battle of Uhud by keeping close to Muhammad while most of the Muslim army fled. He protected Muhammad’s face from an arrow by taking the shot in his own hand, as a result of which two of his fingers were paralyzed. He was also hit twice in the head, and it was said that he suffered a total of 75 wounds in the battle.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talhah

    2) I don’t like what Russia is doing in Syria to be honest, because I don’t like the Assad government any further than I can throw them. The problem is that their opposition is even worse in their conduct and morals so I certainly can’t support them. I just want an end to the fighting – way too many innocents have lost their lives.

    Read comment #38 if you think I have a love affair with anything Russia does.

    Peace. By the way, who gave you access to a keyboard?

    Whoops, there I go again, taking an anonymous post far more seriously than I should. I’m guessing the more common/perfunctory response is probably along the lines of:
    **** you ***hole, eat **** and die!

    Read More
    • Replies: @L.K
    "I don’t like what Russia is doing in Syria to be honest, because I don’t like the Assad government any further than I can throw them. The problem is that their opposition is even worse in their conduct and morals so I certainly can’t support them. I just want an end to the fighting – way too many innocents have lost their lives."


    It is for comments such as this one, that you have deservedly earned the moniker 'uncle' talha.

    I, on the other hand, like very much what Russia is doing in Syria.

    Simply put, Russia is helping to uphold international law against an ILLEGAL proxy war against Syria, a war which, if successful, would have meant yet another client or failed state for the zio-us empire... and one which could be used to further destabilize the region and perhaps the Russian Caucasus too.

    As for the Soviet-Afghan war, it would not have happenned had Zusa & allies not armed Salafist fanatics and mercenaries in Afghanistan, ever thought of that?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Sunni - Pakistani origin.

    For the record - I have no love for Assad's government (LK can attest to that) - and I also think supplying these guys with MANPADS is lunacy of the highest order.

    Peace.

    Why does a Pakistani Sunni chick like you spread your ass cheeks for Russian sausage? You like Russian sausage that much?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hola Senor,

    1) I'm not a chick - my name comes from a man dubbed the 'Falcon of Uhud':
    "Talhah distinguished himself at the Battle of Uhud by keeping close to Muhammad while most of the Muslim army fled. He protected Muhammad's face from an arrow by taking the shot in his own hand, as a result of which two of his fingers were paralyzed. He was also hit twice in the head, and it was said that he suffered a total of 75 wounds in the battle."
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talhah

    2) I don't like what Russia is doing in Syria to be honest, because I don't like the Assad government any further than I can throw them. The problem is that their opposition is even worse in their conduct and morals so I certainly can't support them. I just want an end to the fighting - way too many innocents have lost their lives.

    Read comment #38 if you think I have a love affair with anything Russia does.

    Peace. By the way, who gave you access to a keyboard?

    Whoops, there I go again, taking an anonymous post far more seriously than I should. I'm guessing the more common/perfunctory response is probably along the lines of:
    **** you ***hole, eat **** and die!

    , @Anonymous
    This is the sort of post that could really benefit from censorship- profanity-laden and content-free. Kudos to Talha for a polite response, though.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    The US has no stake in that situation, period. Saudi, Israel, and Turkey who back the rebels are much worse enemies than Iran or Russia. You'll find that anti-US sentiment is much higher in Saudi and Turkey than it is Iran or Russia.

    Saudi, Israel, Turkey, etc. are minor pests. Russia are vermin that won’t go away.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    The Saudis are vociferous in their complaints about the treatment of the Arab minority in Iran, even though that minority is Shia.

    Strong as the US is, it cannot afford to let the Russians keep going and show the world that Russia counts for more than the US. It's a zero sum game. The only thing that will stop the Russians in Syria is their planes being shot out of the sky.

    The US has no stake in that situation, period. Saudi, Israel, and Turkey who back the rebels are much worse enemies than Iran or Russia. You’ll find that anti-US sentiment is much higher in Saudi and Turkey than it is Iran or Russia.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Saudi, Israel, Turkey, etc. are minor pests. Russia are vermin that won't go away.
    , @Fredrik
    Yes,
    but the reason is that the population in both Iran and Russia is not behind its leadership.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Sean
    The Saudis are vociferous in their complaints about the treatment of the Arab minority in Iran, even though that minority is Shia.

    Strong as the US is, it cannot afford to let the Russians keep going and show the world that Russia counts for more than the US. It's a zero sum game. The only thing that will stop the Russians in Syria is their planes being shot out of the sky.

    I’m not sure a Trump admin would give Stingers to the rebels. The CIA would have to have compromising info on Trump to twist his arm into doing so, or run a rogue operation. Shooting down Russian planes with Stingers would stop the Russian advance in Syria, and Russia would not respond directly to the US as it’s too weak to do so. It would likely intensify the war in the Ukraine in response.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Avery
    {that Russia also killed off millions of Orthodox Christians.}

    Yo, Talha:

    Murdered millions of Orthodox Christians is correct.
    But it was not Russia: it was the Bolsheviks, anti-Christian heathens.

    Yo Avery,

    Correction acknowledged – thanks for pointing out the difference between the USSR and Russia. Back in the 80′s nobody cared about the difference; it was all one and the same – but it is not really fair to Russians to smear them with the crimes of the USSR leadership.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/12/06/congress-just-gave-trump-the-authority-to-send-surface-to-air-missiles-to-syrian-fighters/?utm_term=.78eb48a2e994

    We shall see how the baby killer pilots do now.

    {We shall see how the baby killer pilots do now.}

    The baby killers are your cannibal, throat-cutting Islamist terrorist buddies.
    And regarding the Neocon disinformation and propaganda mouthpiece’s headline:
    [Congress just gave Trump the authority to send surface-to-air missiles to Syrian fighters]

    The actual headline should be: [Congress, just gave Trump authority to send surface-to-air missiles to ISIS cannibals, throat-cutters, slavers, baby-killing filthy pigs].

    (Trump will ignore the so-called ‘authorization’)

    And despite the headlines, the cannibals have had manpads since day 1.
    Has not made a difference.
    ISIS Manpads brought down 2-3 Syrian AF ancient MIGs.
    And 1 or 2 RuAF helicopter gunships.
    Russian AF jets fly too high for manpads.
    If ISIS/NATO could bring down RuAF jets with manpads, they wouldn’t recruit Turkey to shoot-down an Su-24 with TuAF F-16s.

    And if need be, Russian AF will bomb the s___ out of ISIS cannibals from stand-off Tu-95s, Tu-160s, and Kalibr cruise-missiles from the Caspian Sea.

    The cowardly ISIS scum have nowhere to hide: death will come from way up. The cowards are shaving their filthy, lice infested beards and fleeing Aleppo. Aleppo is near 95% liberated from terrorist vermin.

    On to Raqqa glorious Syrian Arab Army.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    The Saudis are vociferous in their complaints about the treatment of the Arab minority in Iran, even though that minority is Shia.

    Strong as the US is, it cannot afford to let the Russians keep going and show the world that Russia counts for more than the US. It's a zero sum game. The only thing that will stop the Russians in Syria is their planes being shot out of the sky.

    Hey Sean,

    The Saudis are a lot of things – honestly, who cares what they say. They do a hell of a lot of posturing. If they cared a whit about Arabs, they wouldn’t be bombing Yemen to pieces.

    Strong as the US is, it cannot afford to let the Russians keep going and show the world that Russia counts for more than the US.

    The US counts for more than Russia without any military interference – this is a question of economic influence and pure statistics – people listen to Kanye West in S. Korea. But this is a self-fulfilling prophecy; the more the US pushes and bullies, the more it will turn people to other spheres of influence; Pakistan is a case study on this question.

    The only thing that will stop the Russians in Syria is their planes being shot out of the sky.

    I will ask a similar question I asked on another thread; please list (at least) 25 US cities (in order of preference) that you want turned into radioactive dust in order to safe-guard the sovereignty of Muslim extremists in Eastern Syria.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    The British guarantee to Poland in 1939 was initially to cover its independence only, but when the Nazi Soviet pact was announced the British gave a guarantee of Poland's territory, making war all but inevitable.

    Russia's job in the New World Order is to fight China. But they are getting pally, and to teach the Ruskies that them making a one with China is not acceptable you will see Trump do the following things.
    1. Cut off technology transfers to China
    2. Increase prohibition of technology transfer to Russia (which has none of it's own even in oil resource exploitation ).
    3. Demonstrate to the Russians that their planes are pathetically vulnerable to US weapons in the hands of people without underwear, though this is not perhaps so surprising, because Russian soldiers had no socks until relatively recently.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey Fredrik,

    And they came back and even fiercer than before, again as Solzhenitsyn stated:
    "I would say that of all the special settler, the Chechens alone showed themsleves zeks in spirit. They had been treacherously snatched from their home, and from that day they believed in nothing."
    https://books.google.com/books?id=hEFJ0sGr6e8C&pg=PA347&lpg=PA347&dq=They+had+been+treacherously+snatched+from+their+home,+and+from+that+day+they+believed+in+nothing+Solzhenitsyn&source=bl&ots=d1wxWKqp6V&sig=0oVJOHCRpzuztulppLqLG6XH7HI&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjdmLzd_fHQAhVBlRQKHUPpB5wQ6AEIGzAA#v=onepage&q=They%20had%20been%20treacherously%20snatched%20from%20their%20home%2C%20and%20from%20that%20day%20they%20believed%20in%20nothing%20Solzhenitsyn&f=false

    You don't brutalize a people like that and half-bury them. All those conditions did was make sure the fittest would survive - the Soviet Union literally took a tough, martial people and accelerated their evolution. As Alexandre Dumas wrote:
    "All these mountain fighters are fanatically brave, and whatever money they acquire is spent on weapons. A Chechen . . . may be literally in rags, but his sword, dagger, and gun are of the finest quality."
    http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2005/07/chechnya/meier-text

    That Russia is different than this Russia - that Russia also killed off millions of Orthodox Christians.

    Peace.

    {that Russia also killed off millions of Orthodox Christians.}

    Yo, Talha:

    Murdered millions of Orthodox Christians is correct.
    But it was not Russia: it was the Bolsheviks, anti-Christian heathens.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Yo Avery,

    Correction acknowledged - thanks for pointing out the difference between the USSR and Russia. Back in the 80's nobody cared about the difference; it was all one and the same - but it is not really fair to Russians to smear them with the crimes of the USSR leadership.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Sunni - Pakistani origin.

    For the record - I have no love for Assad's government (LK can attest to that) - and I also think supplying these guys with MANPADS is lunacy of the highest order.

    Peace.

    The Saudis are vociferous in their complaints about the treatment of the Arab minority in Iran, even though that minority is Shia.

    Strong as the US is, it cannot afford to let the Russians keep going and show the world that Russia counts for more than the US. It’s a zero sum game. The only thing that will stop the Russians in Syria is their planes being shot out of the sky.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Sean,

    The Saudis are a lot of things - honestly, who cares what they say. They do a hell of a lot of posturing. If they cared a whit about Arabs, they wouldn't be bombing Yemen to pieces.


    Strong as the US is, it cannot afford to let the Russians keep going and show the world that Russia counts for more than the US.
     
    The US counts for more than Russia without any military interference - this is a question of economic influence and pure statistics - people listen to Kanye West in S. Korea. But this is a self-fulfilling prophecy; the more the US pushes and bullies, the more it will turn people to other spheres of influence; Pakistan is a case study on this question.

    The only thing that will stop the Russians in Syria is their planes being shot out of the sky.
     
    I will ask a similar question I asked on another thread; please list (at least) 25 US cities (in order of preference) that you want turned into radioactive dust in order to safe-guard the sovereignty of Muslim extremists in Eastern Syria.

    Peace.

    , @Anonymous
    I'm not sure a Trump admin would give Stingers to the rebels. The CIA would have to have compromising info on Trump to twist his arm into doing so, or run a rogue operation. Shooting down Russian planes with Stingers would stop the Russian advance in Syria, and Russia would not respond directly to the US as it's too weak to do so. It would likely intensify the war in the Ukraine in response.
    , @Marcus
    The US has no stake in that situation, period. Saudi, Israel, and Turkey who back the rebels are much worse enemies than Iran or Russia. You'll find that anti-US sentiment is much higher in Saudi and Turkey than it is Iran or Russia.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    The US tried to overthrow Castro and the Sandinistas, but couldn't. Most pertinently, the Marxist government of South Yemen easily crushing a Western-Saudi attempt to destablise South Yemen with infiltrators is hardly irrelevant to assessing the claim that the rebellion against Assad is entirely due to foreign infiltrators backed by the Saudi and US governments. Fact is the US has not given the rebels anti aircraft weapons and Israel has not done anything (such as a military build up on the Golan that would draw off the syrian army) to help the rebels. This is primarily internal and secondarily Arab -Persia, if the US wanted Assad gone he would have been history.

    Right, anti-aircraft weapons are the decisive weapons, and they haven’t been supplied to the rebels. They were what defeated the Soviets in Afghanistan.

    Read More
    • Replies: @5371
    You get your knowledge of history from Hollywood. LMAO
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Fredrik
    Russia already moved the Chechens out once. Sure, Russia was called Soviet Union at the time but still. Look what happened in 1944.

    { Sure, Russia was called Soviet Union at the time but still. Look what happened in 1944.}

    Russia was not, quote, called Soviet Union: it _was_ Soviet Union.
    Russia was the largest of the 15 republics, but it was a union.
    Many in the Soviet leadership were in fact not Russian nor Slavic.
    Stalin himself was ethnic Georgian.
    His #1 henchman Beria, also Georgian.
    Longest surviving member of original Bolshevik cadre, Anastas Mikoyan – Armenian.
    And of course lots and lots of Jews in Bolshevik leadership.

    During Yeltsin admin, himself an ethnic Russian, there was a coup.
    The leader of the coup Ruslan Khasbulatov, Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR/Russian Federation, is a Muslim Chechen.
    Contemplate that: the #2 man in RF was a Muslim Chechen.

    As to 1944 and Chechen exile:
    Stalin was supreme dictator until his death.
    He could do pretty much whatever he wanted to do.
    He murdered 1,000s of ethnic Russian/Slav high officers and generals prior to WW2.
    He murdered and exiled 100s of 1,000s of Soviet citizens to Siberia from all over the SU and all ethnicities during and after WW2, until his death in 1953. (including 1,000s of Armenians who had repatriated from to Armenia for all over the world).

    And during wartime, pretty much anything goes.
    UK and US deliberately firebombed Desden, a civilian target: to terrorize Germans.
    US nuked 2 civilian targets in Japan.

    Today is not 1944.
    Stalin exiled Chechens to other parts of Soviet Union at the time.
    Most were repatriated back to Chechnya, of course.

    Where exactly is Moscow going to exile Chechens today, even if Moscow wanted to?
    RF is not USSR and today is not 1944.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Fredrik
    Russia already moved the Chechens out once. Sure, Russia was called Soviet Union at the time but still. Look what happened in 1944.

    Hey Fredrik,

    And they came back and even fiercer than before, again as Solzhenitsyn stated:
    “I would say that of all the special settler, the Chechens alone showed themsleves zeks in spirit. They had been treacherously snatched from their home, and from that day they believed in nothing.”

    https://books.google.com/books?id=hEFJ0sGr6e8C&pg=PA347&lpg=PA347&dq=They+had+been+treacherously+snatched+from+their+home,+and+from+that+day+they+believed+in+nothing+Solzhenitsyn&source=bl&ots=d1wxWKqp6V&sig=0oVJOHCRpzuztulppLqLG6XH7HI&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjdmLzd_fHQAhVBlRQKHUPpB5wQ6AEIGzAA#v=onepage&q=They%20had%20been%20treacherously%20snatched%20from%20their%20home%2C%20and%20from%20that%20day%20they%20believed%20in%20nothing%20Solzhenitsyn&f=false

    You don’t brutalize a people like that and half-bury them. All those conditions did was make sure the fittest would survive – the Soviet Union literally took a tough, martial people and accelerated their evolution. As Alexandre Dumas wrote:
    “All these mountain fighters are fanatically brave, and whatever money they acquire is spent on weapons. A Chechen . . . may be literally in rags, but his sword, dagger, and gun are of the finest quality.”

    http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2005/07/chechnya/meier-text

    That Russia is different than this Russia – that Russia also killed off millions of Orthodox Christians.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {that Russia also killed off millions of Orthodox Christians.}

    Yo, Talha:

    Murdered millions of Orthodox Christians is correct.
    But it was not Russia: it was the Bolsheviks, anti-Christian heathens.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Avery
    {Did you watch the video?}

    The video is shot in Grozny.
    You are right that the Kadyrov clan is far more powerful: they are the local government, not just an organized crime family.
    From what I know, Moscow lets Kadyrov run Chechnya as his personal fiefdom, as long as he keeps wiping out Islamists and stays loyal to Moscow.

    During the last Chechen war Putin somehow turned a section of Chechens, including the Kadyrov clan, and they fiercely fought fellow (Islamist) Chechens and pretty much wiped them out. Chechnya is fairly peaceful now. Moscow spent $billions to rebuild Grozny, including a massive new mosque.

    It's a Devil's bargain.
    I think Putin and Moscow know that Kadyrov and other (Muslim) North Caucasus republics and their leaders can't be fully trusted, but Moscow has bigger global headaches (e.g. Ukraine/Novorossya, Syria,....), and needs to keep a lid on Islamists in its Southern republics.

    And realistically, what can Moscow do?
    Chechens are indigenous to Chechnya: Moscow can't just force them to move out. It's their land.

    And Moscow can't let Chechnya go independent, because then it will become an Islamist terrorist base right on Russia's border. A foreign statelet that Moscow can have no control over.
    It's a mess either way.

    At least that's how I see it as a non-Russian.

    Russia already moved the Chechens out once. Sure, Russia was called Soviet Union at the time but still. Look what happened in 1944.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Fredrik,

    And they came back and even fiercer than before, again as Solzhenitsyn stated:
    "I would say that of all the special settler, the Chechens alone showed themsleves zeks in spirit. They had been treacherously snatched from their home, and from that day they believed in nothing."
    https://books.google.com/books?id=hEFJ0sGr6e8C&pg=PA347&lpg=PA347&dq=They+had+been+treacherously+snatched+from+their+home,+and+from+that+day+they+believed+in+nothing+Solzhenitsyn&source=bl&ots=d1wxWKqp6V&sig=0oVJOHCRpzuztulppLqLG6XH7HI&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjdmLzd_fHQAhVBlRQKHUPpB5wQ6AEIGzAA#v=onepage&q=They%20had%20been%20treacherously%20snatched%20from%20their%20home%2C%20and%20from%20that%20day%20they%20believed%20in%20nothing%20Solzhenitsyn&f=false

    You don't brutalize a people like that and half-bury them. All those conditions did was make sure the fittest would survive - the Soviet Union literally took a tough, martial people and accelerated their evolution. As Alexandre Dumas wrote:
    "All these mountain fighters are fanatically brave, and whatever money they acquire is spent on weapons. A Chechen . . . may be literally in rags, but his sword, dagger, and gun are of the finest quality."
    http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2005/07/chechnya/meier-text

    That Russia is different than this Russia - that Russia also killed off millions of Orthodox Christians.

    Peace.
    , @Avery
    { Sure, Russia was called Soviet Union at the time but still. Look what happened in 1944.}

    Russia was not, quote, called Soviet Union: it _was_ Soviet Union.
    Russia was the largest of the 15 republics, but it was a union.
    Many in the Soviet leadership were in fact not Russian nor Slavic.
    Stalin himself was ethnic Georgian.
    His #1 henchman Beria, also Georgian.
    Longest surviving member of original Bolshevik cadre, Anastas Mikoyan - Armenian.
    And of course lots and lots of Jews in Bolshevik leadership.

    During Yeltsin admin, himself an ethnic Russian, there was a coup.
    The leader of the coup Ruslan Khasbulatov, Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR/Russian Federation, is a Muslim Chechen.
    Contemplate that: the #2 man in RF was a Muslim Chechen.


    As to 1944 and Chechen exile:
    Stalin was supreme dictator until his death.
    He could do pretty much whatever he wanted to do.
    He murdered 1,000s of ethnic Russian/Slav high officers and generals prior to WW2.
    He murdered and exiled 100s of 1,000s of Soviet citizens to Siberia from all over the SU and all ethnicities during and after WW2, until his death in 1953. (including 1,000s of Armenians who had repatriated from to Armenia for all over the world).

    And during wartime, pretty much anything goes.
    UK and US deliberately firebombed Desden, a civilian target: to terrorize Germans.
    US nuked 2 civilian targets in Japan.

    Today is not 1944.
    Stalin exiled Chechens to other parts of Soviet Union at the time.
    Most were repatriated back to Chechnya, of course.

    Where exactly is Moscow going to exile Chechens today, even if Moscow wanted to?
    RF is not USSR and today is not 1944.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Delinquent Snail
    This cant be real. It got to be from a shitty soap opera......

    If its real..... These people are scum. They try to imitate the class of westerners but mess it all up with their garbage tribal traditions.

    Of course it’s real.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    The majority of Syrians are Sunni Arabs, what are you?

    Sunni – Pakistani origin.

    For the record – I have no love for Assad’s government (LK can attest to that) – and I also think supplying these guys with MANPADS is lunacy of the highest order.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    The Saudis are vociferous in their complaints about the treatment of the Arab minority in Iran, even though that minority is Shia.

    Strong as the US is, it cannot afford to let the Russians keep going and show the world that Russia counts for more than the US. It's a zero sum game. The only thing that will stop the Russians in Syria is their planes being shot out of the sky.

    , @Anonymous
    Why does a Pakistani Sunni chick like you spread your ass cheeks for Russian sausage? You like Russian sausage that much?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @NoseytheDuke
    You appear to have an inclination towards the writing of fiction, if not the talent.

    The US tried to overthrow Castro and the Sandinistas, but couldn’t. Most pertinently, the Marxist government of South Yemen easily crushing a Western-Saudi attempt to destablise South Yemen with infiltrators is hardly irrelevant to assessing the claim that the rebellion against Assad is entirely due to foreign infiltrators backed by the Saudi and US governments. Fact is the US has not given the rebels anti aircraft weapons and Israel has not done anything (such as a military build up on the Golan that would draw off the syrian army) to help the rebels. This is primarily internal and secondarily Arab -Persia, if the US wanted Assad gone he would have been history.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Right, anti-aircraft weapons are the decisive weapons, and they haven't been supplied to the rebels. They were what defeated the Soviets in Afghanistan.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WmDszVxti0
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    In hindsight, I've realized I'm taking some people far, far too seriously. I sometimes feel obligated to respond even though I doubt it will have any affect on the person. Yet, at least I can get my perspective out there...but then I think; wait - what if nobody else is taking the person seriously either and I'm basically having a waltz on my own?

    This internet business is a strange beast indeed...

    Peace.

    The majority of Syrians are Sunni Arabs, what are you?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Sunni - Pakistani origin.

    For the record - I have no love for Assad's government (LK can attest to that) - and I also think supplying these guys with MANPADS is lunacy of the highest order.

    Peace.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    "primitive Russian airplanes."
    You can't really be this stupid. What does NATO have that matches the SU-34 or SU-35?? Maybe the F-22. And the TA-50 will be the premier fifth generation fighter.
    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {We shall see how the baby killer pilots do now.}

    The baby killers are your cannibal, throat-cutting Islamist terrorist buddies.
    And regarding the Neocon disinformation and propaganda mouthpiece's headline:
    [Congress just gave Trump the authority to send surface-to-air missiles to Syrian fighters]

    The actual headline should be: [Congress, just gave Trump authority to send surface-to-air missiles to ISIS cannibals, throat-cutters, slavers, baby-killing filthy pigs].

    (Trump will ignore the so-called 'authorization')

    And despite the headlines, the cannibals have had manpads since day 1.
    Has not made a difference.
    ISIS Manpads brought down 2-3 Syrian AF ancient MIGs.
    And 1 or 2 RuAF helicopter gunships.
    Russian AF jets fly too high for manpads.
    If ISIS/NATO could bring down RuAF jets with manpads, they wouldn't recruit Turkey to shoot-down an Su-24 with TuAF F-16s.

    And if need be, Russian AF will bomb the s___ out of ISIS cannibals from stand-off Tu-95s, Tu-160s, and Kalibr cruise-missiles from the Caspian Sea.

    The cowardly ISIS scum have nowhere to hide: death will come from way up. The cowards are shaving their filthy, lice infested beards and fleeing Aleppo. Aleppo is near 95% liberated from terrorist vermin.

    On to Raqqa glorious Syrian Arab Army.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @NoseytheDuke
    Minds already made up are really hard to change anyway and we are all so conditioned in oh so many ways.

    Probably it is us who are the strange beasts but getting your perspective out there matters as a form of giving ones self-expression "as in yonder valley the myrtle breathes its fragrance into space" ... Gibran again ;o).

    I’ve always loved Gibran – such amazing command of the English language; he plays it like an instrument.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Chechnya is mostly surrounded by Russian federal territories. A siege on it coupled with bombing valleys with crops would eliminate most of them. The rest in the mountains can be mopped up with search and destroy missions, and by drawing them out of the mountains and into the valleys to trap them like a roach motel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace
    It would work like clockwork.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Minds already made up are really hard to change anyway and we are all so conditioned in oh so many ways.

    Probably it is us who are the strange beasts but getting your perspective out there matters as a form of giving ones self-expression “as in yonder valley the myrtle breathes its fragrance into space” … Gibran again ;o).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    I've always loved Gibran - such amazing command of the English language; he plays it like an instrument.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @NoseytheDuke
    You appear to have an inclination towards the writing of fiction, if not the talent.

    In hindsight, I’ve realized I’m taking some people far, far too seriously. I sometimes feel obligated to respond even though I doubt it will have any affect on the person. Yet, at least I can get my perspective out there…but then I think; wait – what if nobody else is taking the person seriously either and I’m basically having a waltz on my own?

    This internet business is a strange beast indeed…

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    The majority of Syrians are Sunni Arabs, what are you?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus

    Second, Ramzan Kadyrov has been pouring huge resources, with the full support of Putin, of course, into the creation of a unique special forces training facility in Chechnia where special operators from all over Russia are coming to learn, teach and share their experience.
     
    He has no resources, only loot from Russian taxpayers funneled to him by Putin kleptocracy.

    So says the american state department division of propaganda

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • We know that Putin sent some secret letter to Iranian President Rouhani. Could it be to coordinate a surge in Russian and Iranian operations in Syria?

    These Russian Chechen units are probably counter-SOF, they’re going to try to capture a US SOF operator and hand him to the Iranians. To counter all that support the US seems to pour on the Islamists (because freedom).

    America can blackout somethings from the US media but not a captured soldier being paraded around and broadcasted on CCTV, BBC, and PressTV.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    There are Russian infantry in Syria, which hardly suggests Assad's large army of Syrians includes many troops he can count on. It is true that the Russians and the Iranian cannon fodder with Russian artillery are winning taking territory from the rebels, but that is mainly because they have not been given US anti aircraft weapons which would make short work of the primitive Russian airplanes. but they don't need rear-area security police to control, a population sympathetic to Assad. The Jihadis will all leave as the rebel areas being taken, so the Russians will win areas that contain almost entirely Syrian civilians , and the Chachens are brought in for false flag attacks , and than to terrorise these helpless defenceless people for the mortal sin of not wanting to be ruled by a family of murdering puppets.

    Assad's dad used Hezbollah to drive the Israelis out of Lebanon and then, masquerading as "Islamic Jihad", to kill hundred of US marines, to great effect. Then Assad junior facilitated the use of Syria by foreign suicide bombers heading for Iraq. Assad wanted to drive the US out by terrorism, an objective his Russian masters no doubt supported. But it turned into an Iraqi Shia-Sunni was and the Sunni radicals were irrepressible, gradually crossing into the Syrian Civil war which was partly a response to Assad junior's economic austerity measures.

    Its just not that easy to overthrow even a secular Arab country with infiltation. Western intelligence and the Saudis couldn't do it in South Yemen. The west has been neutral in all this, which is mainly a non religous Arab persian or Saudi- Iran state quarrel not an internal Syrian secular- verses Islamicist one. But at bottom why should the US support Russian client Assad; because his political incompetence and facilitating of the jihadist killing of US soldiers in Iraq blew up in his face?

    You appear to have an inclination towards the writing of fiction, if not the talent.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    In hindsight, I've realized I'm taking some people far, far too seriously. I sometimes feel obligated to respond even though I doubt it will have any affect on the person. Yet, at least I can get my perspective out there...but then I think; wait - what if nobody else is taking the person seriously either and I'm basically having a waltz on my own?

    This internet business is a strange beast indeed...

    Peace.

    , @Sean
    The US tried to overthrow Castro and the Sandinistas, but couldn't. Most pertinently, the Marxist government of South Yemen easily crushing a Western-Saudi attempt to destablise South Yemen with infiltrators is hardly irrelevant to assessing the claim that the rebellion against Assad is entirely due to foreign infiltrators backed by the Saudi and US governments. Fact is the US has not given the rebels anti aircraft weapons and Israel has not done anything (such as a military build up on the Golan that would draw off the syrian army) to help the rebels. This is primarily internal and secondarily Arab -Persia, if the US wanted Assad gone he would have been history.
    , @L.K
    Yes,

    Sean's ridiculous posts are indeed pure fantasy, look at this troll's description of the war in Iraq!!!

    He's probably a failed Hollywood script writer.... and it's pretty damn hard to find even one hollywood movie these days with a reasonably well written script! haha
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    There are Russian infantry in Syria, which hardly suggests Assad's large army of Syrians includes many troops he can count on. It is true that the Russians and the Iranian cannon fodder with Russian artillery are winning taking territory from the rebels, but that is mainly because they have not been given US anti aircraft weapons which would make short work of the primitive Russian airplanes. but they don't need rear-area security police to control, a population sympathetic to Assad. The Jihadis will all leave as the rebel areas being taken, so the Russians will win areas that contain almost entirely Syrian civilians , and the Chachens are brought in for false flag attacks , and than to terrorise these helpless defenceless people for the mortal sin of not wanting to be ruled by a family of murdering puppets.

    Assad's dad used Hezbollah to drive the Israelis out of Lebanon and then, masquerading as "Islamic Jihad", to kill hundred of US marines, to great effect. Then Assad junior facilitated the use of Syria by foreign suicide bombers heading for Iraq. Assad wanted to drive the US out by terrorism, an objective his Russian masters no doubt supported. But it turned into an Iraqi Shia-Sunni was and the Sunni radicals were irrepressible, gradually crossing into the Syrian Civil war which was partly a response to Assad junior's economic austerity measures.

    Its just not that easy to overthrow even a secular Arab country with infiltation. Western intelligence and the Saudis couldn't do it in South Yemen. The west has been neutral in all this, which is mainly a non religous Arab persian or Saudi- Iran state quarrel not an internal Syrian secular- verses Islamicist one. But at bottom why should the US support Russian client Assad; because his political incompetence and facilitating of the jihadist killing of US soldiers in Iraq blew up in his face?

    “primitive Russian airplanes.”
    You can’t really be this stupid. What does NATO have that matches the SU-34 or SU-35?? Maybe the F-22. And the TA-50 will be the premier fifth generation fighter.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/12/06/congress-just-gave-trump-the-authority-to-send-surface-to-air-missiles-to-syrian-fighters/?utm_term=.78eb48a2e994

    We shall see how the baby killer pilots do now.

    , @5371
    No, from long experience I can assure you that he really is this stupid.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RadicalCenter
    Stalin got that one right. Something I never say, LOL.

    Russia / USSR should have driven out the Chechens (and for that matter, never should let the Tatars return to the Crimea).

    Stalin got that one right.

    Apparently he did not, they are still alive and kicking:
    “…there was one nation which would not give in, would not acquire the mental habits of submission–and not just individual rebels among them, but the whole nation to a man. These were the Chechens…” – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

    Russia / USSR should have driven out the Chechens

    Ah yes, like the Circassians:

    https://www.ncas.rutgers.edu/center-study-genocide-conflict-resolution-and-human-rights/mid-nineteenth-century-genocidal-pacifica

    https://muse.jhu.edu/book/22028

    Surprise, surprise yet another notch on your belt for advocating genocide.

    Notice we haven’t called for exterminating or driving away the many other races and religious groupings in the world

    Read your own posts, chief.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @L.K
    I had missed this 'gem' of a post by you, Sean;

    You give trolling and lying an entire new dimension.

    Contrary to your many pathetic lies;

    - The vast majority of the troops fighting for Syria are SYRIANS; mostly Sunni Syrians.
    They are the real moderates. There are also Christian, Alawite, Druze and Shia Syrians, which reflects Syria's multi-confessional and secular society.

    - A very large proportion of the 'Syrian rebels' is made up of foreign fighters from over 90 countries. Not long ago, a US senate military committee put the number of foreign 'rebels' at nearly 40,000. Large numbers of foreign jihadis were already present in Syria since the summer of 2012. Needless to say both the foreign as well as the syrian jihadists have been fighting only bc they are being heavily funded by various foreign powers under the US umbrella.

    - President Assad has a LOT of popular support. More than most Western leaders.

    - As for 'Lebanese' troops, you must have been referring to Hezbollah.
    Even serious Israeli analysts have determined that Hezb's military wing is much larger and better armed today than back in 06, when just a fraction of their men was enough to defeat the idf cowards. Not to mention all the experience gained in Syria and how battle-hardened their men have become. From the biased and pro-Israel wikipedia:

    Israeli military officials and analysts have also drawn attention to the experience and weaponry the group would have gained from the involvement of thousands of its fighters in the Syrian Civil War. "This kind of experience cannot be bought," said Gabi Siboni, director of the military and strategic affairs program at the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University. "It is an additional factor that we will have to deal with. There is no replacement for experience, and it is not to be scoffed at."[184]

     

    As I write these lines they are helping the SAA eliminate the last of your jihadi heroes from Aleppo.

    You are an idiot and a liar... totally clueless as to what is happening in Syria.

    There are Russian infantry in Syria, which hardly suggests Assad’s large army of Syrians includes many troops he can count on. It is true that the Russians and the Iranian cannon fodder with Russian artillery are winning taking territory from the rebels, but that is mainly because they have not been given US anti aircraft weapons which would make short work of the primitive Russian airplanes. but they don’t need rear-area security police to control, a population sympathetic to Assad. The Jihadis will all leave as the rebel areas being taken, so the Russians will win areas that contain almost entirely Syrian civilians , and the Chachens are brought in for false flag attacks , and than to terrorise these helpless defenceless people for the mortal sin of not wanting to be ruled by a family of murdering puppets.

    Assad’s dad used Hezbollah to drive the Israelis out of Lebanon and then, masquerading as “Islamic Jihad”, to kill hundred of US marines, to great effect. Then Assad junior facilitated the use of Syria by foreign suicide bombers heading for Iraq. Assad wanted to drive the US out by terrorism, an objective his Russian masters no doubt supported. But it turned into an Iraqi Shia-Sunni was and the Sunni radicals were irrepressible, gradually crossing into the Syrian Civil war which was partly a response to Assad junior’s economic austerity measures.

    Its just not that easy to overthrow even a secular Arab country with infiltation. Western intelligence and the Saudis couldn’t do it in South Yemen. The west has been neutral in all this, which is mainly a non religous Arab persian or Saudi- Iran state quarrel not an internal Syrian secular- verses Islamicist one. But at bottom why should the US support Russian client Assad; because his political incompetence and facilitating of the jihadist killing of US soldiers in Iraq blew up in his face?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    "primitive Russian airplanes."
    You can't really be this stupid. What does NATO have that matches the SU-34 or SU-35?? Maybe the F-22. And the TA-50 will be the premier fifth generation fighter.
    , @NoseytheDuke
    You appear to have an inclination towards the writing of fiction, if not the talent.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean

    You can feel free to cite to me any instance of when they went up the Volga to raid Moscow or St. Petersburg or Kiev.
     
    Peter Turchin says they did just that by luring thousands of Russians to the north Caucuses with the offer of a lucrative job, then enslaving them.

    Hey Sean,

    Found your source:
    “Those who had wealthy relatives were held for ransom, while the majority was put to work in agriculture and construction. Some people were lured into North Caucuses from as far away as St. Petersburg and Moscow with promises of a lucrative job. It is not known how many people were enslaved, but the count is in the many thousands.”

    http://peterturchin.com/cliodynamica/the-forecast-i-made-about-russia-in-2004/

    I thought I was clear that I was talking about pre-modern Chechens. Mr. Churchin is obviously talking about the Wahabbised Chechen extremists of modern times (the late 90′s).

    Luring, capturing and ransoming gullible Russians by criminal elements is not the same as what the Tatars did – not by a long shot.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey Sean,

    We're talking about Chechens here so let's get factual...
    1) Historically and geographically speaking, Chechens were never part of the Tatar Khanates. They were a part of the Safavid Empire when they started turning towards Islam, and then annexed by the conquests of the Russian Tsars.
    2) Pretty White women were also being sold by the Varangian Rus for centuries to both Byzantium and Muslim lands - until they decided to quit pretty late in the game:
    “Also valued in the East were the slaves that the Rus captured from among the Eastern European peoples—Slavs, from which English has derived the word slave. According to the itinerant geographer Ibn Hawkal, writing in 977, the Rus slave trade ran “from Spain to Egypt.””
    http://archive.aramcoworld.com/issue/199906/among.the.norse.tribes-the.remarkable.account.of.ibn.fadlan.htm

    “In addition, Kiev also traded with Central and West Asia, establishing commercial relations with the Islamic Empire, supplying slaves from Russia and Central Asia to the Abbasid Caliphate in Baghdad.”
    World History: Journeys from Past to Present

    “Ibn Hawqal, an Arab geographer, described a Viking slave trade in 977 A.D. that extended across the Mediterranean from Spain to Egypt. Others recorded that slaves from northern Europe were funneled from Scandinavia through Russia to Byzantium and Baghdad…Some genetic studies, for example, suggest that a majority of Icelandic women are related to Scottish and Irish ancestors who likely were raid booty.”
    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/12/151228-vikings-slaves-thralls-norse-scandinavia-archaeology/ (Now there's a detailed rendition of a White man selling a White woman to a Muslim merchant.)

    3) The Tatars did indeed do slave-raids into Russia and Tsar Ivan stopped them...hard with little mercy. Or have you never read what happened to Kazan and a few other key Tatar cities and their populations?

    The only thing Chechens (also other Caucasians, etc.) have been historically (we're talking pre-20th century) guilty of is kicking out the Tsar's armies and Russian settlers from their lands and trying to establish their own sovereign state within the Caucasus. You can feel free to cite to me any instance of when they went up the Volga to raid Moscow or St. Petersburg or Kiev. Maybe the only other thing they are guilty of is surviving Stalin's attempt to send their entire population to a miserable cold grave:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1399561/1944-1957-Deportation-and-exile.html

    As far as the current Chechens; I agree with Marcus in that far too many of them are involved in extremist ideology or in international crime.

    Peace.

    Stalin got that one right. Something I never say, LOL.

    Russia / USSR should have driven out the Chechens (and for that matter, never should let the Tatars return to the Crimea).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha

    Stalin got that one right.
     
    Apparently he did not, they are still alive and kicking:
    "...there was one nation which would not give in, would not acquire the mental habits of submission–and not just individual rebels among them, but the whole nation to a man. These were the Chechens..." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

    Russia / USSR should have driven out the Chechens
     
    Ah yes, like the Circassians:
    https://www.ncas.rutgers.edu/center-study-genocide-conflict-resolution-and-human-rights/mid-nineteenth-century-genocidal-pacifica
    https://muse.jhu.edu/book/22028

    Surprise, surprise yet another notch on your belt for advocating genocide.


    Notice we haven’t called for exterminating or driving away the many other races and religious groupings in the world
     
    Read your own posts, chief.

    Peace.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    With that sort of ethics, somebody could conjure up an equally convincing and rational justification to exterminate the likes of you, Marcus.

    Doesn’t seem like muslims have ever had trouble coming up with a justification for subjugating, torturing or killing nonmuslims for over a millennium now.

    Notice we haven’t called for exterminating or driving away the many other races and religious groupings in the world, because islam is INHERENTLY a uniquely incorrigibly cruel, intolerant, dangerous and expansionist movement.

    Read More
    • Agree: Ace
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @L.K
    Only a depraved asshole would write about eradicating a Nation from their homeland.

    Your beloved Zamerica supported Chechen separatists in the wars in the Caucasus in order to bring harm to Russia, just like your depraved country, a country that has been at war for more than 90% of its historical existence, wars of choice and empire, has been in bed with radical Islam(Salafism/Waahabism) for many decades. The UK for even longer.

    U.S. Supported Chechen Terrorists
    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/04/u-s-support-chechen-terrorists-fighting-russia-just-like-we-supported-al-qaeda-to-fight-russia.html

    The U.S. is the world’s largest sponsor of terror;
    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/01/by-any-measure-the-u-s-is-the-worlds-largest-sponsor-of-terror.html

    The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom said:

    By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.

    The Washington Post reported in 2010:

    The United States has long been an exporter of terrorism, according to a secret CIA analysis released Wednesday by the Web site WikiLeaks.

     

    The Chechens' American friends
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/08/usa.russia

    Allegations are even being made in Russia that the west itself is somehow behind the Chechen rebellion, and that the purpose of such support is to weaken Russia, and to drive her out of the Caucasus. The fact that the Chechens are believed to use as a base the Pankisi gorge in neighbouring Georgia - a country which aspires to join Nato, has an extremely pro-American government, and where the US already has a significant military presence - only encourages such speculation. Putin himself even seemed to lend credence to the idea in his interview with foreign journalists on Monday.

     

    Chechen Terrorists and the Neocons
    https://consortiumnews.com/2013/04/19/chechen-terrorists-and-the-neocons/

    You assholes and your allies and client states have created all these radical groups, the various al-Ciada outfits, the people who later became the Taliban, ISIS/DAESH, etc..

    In Lybia, some of the key 'rebel' fighters were al-qaeda linked or members.

    In Syria the situation is even much worse.
    How the US Armed-up Syrian Jihadists
    http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/09/29/how-us-armed-syrian-jihadists

    ...a former Green Beret writes of America’s covert and clandestine programs to train and arm Syrian insurgents, “they know we are just training the next generation of jihadis
     
    Then you scumbags have the gall to talk about muslim savages and what not!!
    Take a hard look in the mirror first!

    I oppose the salvages who are born in USA or have white skin, too, and I’ve actively opposed every us military intervention in my adult lifetime save one. Bother reading my other comments and you’d know that.

    I stand by the view that Islam is inherently savage and that nonmuslims are never safe with large numbers of muslims in or near their (nonmuslims’) lands.

    To Hell with islam.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey Sean,

    We're talking about Chechens here so let's get factual...
    1) Historically and geographically speaking, Chechens were never part of the Tatar Khanates. They were a part of the Safavid Empire when they started turning towards Islam, and then annexed by the conquests of the Russian Tsars.
    2) Pretty White women were also being sold by the Varangian Rus for centuries to both Byzantium and Muslim lands - until they decided to quit pretty late in the game:
    “Also valued in the East were the slaves that the Rus captured from among the Eastern European peoples—Slavs, from which English has derived the word slave. According to the itinerant geographer Ibn Hawkal, writing in 977, the Rus slave trade ran “from Spain to Egypt.””
    http://archive.aramcoworld.com/issue/199906/among.the.norse.tribes-the.remarkable.account.of.ibn.fadlan.htm

    “In addition, Kiev also traded with Central and West Asia, establishing commercial relations with the Islamic Empire, supplying slaves from Russia and Central Asia to the Abbasid Caliphate in Baghdad.”
    World History: Journeys from Past to Present

    “Ibn Hawqal, an Arab geographer, described a Viking slave trade in 977 A.D. that extended across the Mediterranean from Spain to Egypt. Others recorded that slaves from northern Europe were funneled from Scandinavia through Russia to Byzantium and Baghdad…Some genetic studies, for example, suggest that a majority of Icelandic women are related to Scottish and Irish ancestors who likely were raid booty.”
    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/12/151228-vikings-slaves-thralls-norse-scandinavia-archaeology/ (Now there's a detailed rendition of a White man selling a White woman to a Muslim merchant.)

    3) The Tatars did indeed do slave-raids into Russia and Tsar Ivan stopped them...hard with little mercy. Or have you never read what happened to Kazan and a few other key Tatar cities and their populations?

    The only thing Chechens (also other Caucasians, etc.) have been historically (we're talking pre-20th century) guilty of is kicking out the Tsar's armies and Russian settlers from their lands and trying to establish their own sovereign state within the Caucasus. You can feel free to cite to me any instance of when they went up the Volga to raid Moscow or St. Petersburg or Kiev. Maybe the only other thing they are guilty of is surviving Stalin's attempt to send their entire population to a miserable cold grave:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1399561/1944-1957-Deportation-and-exile.html

    As far as the current Chechens; I agree with Marcus in that far too many of them are involved in extremist ideology or in international crime.

    Peace.

    You can feel free to cite to me any instance of when they went up the Volga to raid Moscow or St. Petersburg or Kiev.

    Peter Turchin says they did just that by luring thousands of Russians to the north Caucuses with the offer of a lucrative job, then enslaving them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Sean,

    Found your source:
    "Those who had wealthy relatives were held for ransom, while the majority was put to work in agriculture and construction. Some people were lured into North Caucuses from as far away as St. Petersburg and Moscow with promises of a lucrative job. It is not known how many people were enslaved, but the count is in the many thousands."
    http://peterturchin.com/cliodynamica/the-forecast-i-made-about-russia-in-2004/

    I thought I was clear that I was talking about pre-modern Chechens. Mr. Churchin is obviously talking about the Wahabbised Chechen extremists of modern times (the late 90's).

    Luring, capturing and ransoming gullible Russians by criminal elements is not the same as what the Tatars did - not by a long shot.

    Peace.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • They’re going there to neutralize the US special-operations forces..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • […] Putin Sends Chechen Special Operation Forces to Syria […]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    Muslims in that part of the world have been kidnapping pretty northern Euro women (boys too) as sex slaves for a long time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roxelana

    Vlad the Impaler was a prisoner of the Turks as a boy.

    Hey Sean,

    We’re talking about Chechens here so let’s get factual…
    1) Historically and geographically speaking, Chechens were never part of the Tatar Khanates. They were a part of the Safavid Empire when they started turning towards Islam, and then annexed by the conquests of the Russian Tsars.
    2) Pretty White women were also being sold by the Varangian Rus for centuries to both Byzantium and Muslim lands – until they decided to quit pretty late in the game:
    “Also valued in the East were the slaves that the Rus captured from among the Eastern European peoples—Slavs, from which English has derived the word slave. According to the itinerant geographer Ibn Hawkal, writing in 977, the Rus slave trade ran “from Spain to Egypt.””

    http://archive.aramcoworld.com/issue/199906/among.the.norse.tribes-the.remarkable.account.of.ibn.fadlan.htm

    “In addition, Kiev also traded with Central and West Asia, establishing commercial relations with the Islamic Empire, supplying slaves from Russia and Central Asia to the Abbasid Caliphate in Baghdad.”
    World History: Journeys from Past to Present

    “Ibn Hawqal, an Arab geographer, described a Viking slave trade in 977 A.D. that extended across the Mediterranean from Spain to Egypt. Others recorded that slaves from northern Europe were funneled from Scandinavia through Russia to Byzantium and Baghdad…Some genetic studies, for example, suggest that a majority of Icelandic women are related to Scottish and Irish ancestors who likely were raid booty.”
    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/12/151228-vikings-slaves-thralls-norse-scandinavia-archaeology/ (Now there’s a detailed rendition of a White man selling a White woman to a Muslim merchant.)

    3) The Tatars did indeed do slave-raids into Russia and Tsar Ivan stopped them…hard with little mercy. Or have you never read what happened to Kazan and a few other key Tatar cities and their populations?

    The only thing Chechens (also other Caucasians, etc.) have been historically (we’re talking pre-20th century) guilty of is kicking out the Tsar’s armies and Russian settlers from their lands and trying to establish their own sovereign state within the Caucasus. You can feel free to cite to me any instance of when they went up the Volga to raid Moscow or St. Petersburg or Kiev. Maybe the only other thing they are guilty of is surviving Stalin’s attempt to send their entire population to a miserable cold grave:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1399561/1944-1957-Deportation-and-exile.html

    As far as the current Chechens; I agree with Marcus in that far too many of them are involved in extremist ideology or in international crime.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean

    You can feel free to cite to me any instance of when they went up the Volga to raid Moscow or St. Petersburg or Kiev.
     
    Peter Turchin says they did just that by luring thousands of Russians to the north Caucuses with the offer of a lucrative job, then enslaving them.
    , @RadicalCenter
    Stalin got that one right. Something I never say, LOL.

    Russia / USSR should have driven out the Chechens (and for that matter, never should let the Tatars return to the Crimea).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    With that sort of ethics, somebody could conjure up an equally convincing and rational justification to exterminate the likes of you, Marcus.

    In your view, what should be done with a people like Chechens who produce nothing but crime and terrorism?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    Chechens are vermin even by Muslim standards, and Putin lets them terrorize ordinary Russians with impunity.
    https://youtu.be/ZStMWYh0VTM

    This cant be real. It got to be from a shitty soap opera……

    If its real….. These people are scum. They try to imitate the class of westerners but mess it all up with their garbage tribal traditions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Fredrik
    Of course it's real.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    Not many people deserve to be exterminated, but Chechens certainly qualify, they combine the worst aspects of blacks and Arabs, produce nothing but crime and terrorism. Putin is using them as mafia enforcers and reallocating billions of dollars from Russian taxpayers to turn Grozny into mini-Dubai. Disgusting.
    ETA: Russians I've talked to say Azeris are actually worse, I'm sure Avery will vouch for this.

    With that sort of ethics, somebody could conjure up an equally convincing and rational justification to exterminate the likes of you, Marcus.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    In your view, what should be done with a people like Chechens who produce nothing but crime and terrorism?
    , @RadicalCenter
    Doesn't seem like muslims have ever had trouble coming up with a justification for subjugating, torturing or killing nonmuslims for over a millennium now.

    Notice we haven't called for exterminating or driving away the many other races and religious groupings in the world, because islam is INHERENTLY a uniquely incorrigibly cruel, intolerant, dangerous and expansionist movement.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Some Chechens have light coloring (grey eyes, light brown hair), it is their distinct racial look and has nothing to do with any bride kidnappings (btw, most of the “kidnapped” Chechen brides historically have been Chechen / of Caucasus descent anyway, they used to be very isolated and live in clans). Color wise some of them can pass for a certain type of N.European. Why it’s not because of the admixture of foreigners….? Because Chechens don’t intermix with other races and because these light skinned Chechens still retain the distinct Caucausus features, such a specific looking nose, a specific looking upper face that only the so called “kavkaztsi” have. In case of admixture, those features would be either lost or diminished.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Hunsdon
    What kind of monster are you? Exterminate, exterminate, it's like you're a Dalek from a bad Dr Who episode.

    Russia has played a smart card in Chechnya: "Let the Chechens handle it." They bought the Kadyrovs fair and square, and, so far at least, the Kadyrovs have been true to their salt (to use an old Great Game-ism). Chechnya today ain't nothing like late 90s Chechnya, and the change is all for the better.

    Not many people deserve to be exterminated, but Chechens certainly qualify, they combine the worst aspects of blacks and Arabs, produce nothing but crime and terrorism. Putin is using them as mafia enforcers and reallocating billions of dollars from Russian taxpayers to turn Grozny into mini-Dubai. Disgusting.
    ETA: Russians I’ve talked to say Azeris are actually worse, I’m sure Avery will vouch for this.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    With that sort of ethics, somebody could conjure up an equally convincing and rational justification to exterminate the likes of you, Marcus.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @L.K
    Idiot. Zusa is the biggest exporter of terrorism in the world and your government covertly supported the Chechen insurgents.

    I’ll readily admit the US (and our Anglo cousins) has played a shameful role in supporting Muslims against Christians and others I believe the past.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • One word: Gurkas.

    By the way, the British were and still are supporting Wahhabist Chechens (mostly terrorists) against Chechyna and the Russian Federation.

    Part of their alignment with the Saudis, Qataris, and such. Thus the Chechens in ISIS in Syria, that the RF Chechen special forces will likely hunt down.

    Moreover, it is clear that the Chechens (not from Chechnya) that the CIA brought to the US and who bombed the Boston Marathon were part of a like program, also directed against the Russians.

    More ancient history: Wahhabist Chechens were recruited to fight with Albanians against Yugoslavia. Britain, the US, and even Israel looked on with approval.

    Do y’all really believe Russians have as short memories as y’all seem to?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    The Assad family dictatorship is running out of Lebanese, who are getting less keen on going to fight in Syria; too many Syrians to kill and too many Lebanese have not come back. You cannot fight a civil war with foreign troops and claim any kind of legitimacy.

    They won't go anywhere near the front lines, so the flower of Chechen soldiery are being brought in to rape, torture, mutilate and kill in various horrific ways undefended women and children foolish enough to not leave territory captured from the rebels. These blowtouch-welding Chechin palladins will pretend to be Syrian rebels of course. Then the Russians will call in the international press and say " Oh dear, look what the foreign jihadis did before they left". What else do you expect from people who cleared paths through German minefields in WW2 by herding their own civilians through them at gunpoint

    I had missed this ‘gem’ of a post by you, Sean;

    You give trolling and lying an entire new dimension.

    Contrary to your many pathetic lies;

    - The vast majority of the troops fighting for Syria are SYRIANS; mostly Sunni Syrians.
    They are the real moderates. There are also Christian, Alawite, Druze and Shia Syrians, which reflects Syria’s multi-confessional and secular society.

    - A very large proportion of the ‘Syrian rebels’ is made up of foreign fighters from over 90 countries. Not long ago, a US senate military committee put the number of foreign ‘rebels’ at nearly 40,000. Large numbers of foreign jihadis were already present in Syria since the summer of 2012. Needless to say both the foreign as well as the syrian jihadists have been fighting only bc they are being heavily funded by various foreign powers under the US umbrella.

    - President Assad has a LOT of popular support. More than most Western leaders.

    - As for ‘Lebanese’ troops, you must have been referring to Hezbollah.
    Even serious Israeli analysts have determined that Hezb’s military wing is much larger and better armed today than back in 06, when just a fraction of their men was enough to defeat the idf cowards. Not to mention all the experience gained in Syria and how battle-hardened their men have become. From the biased and pro-Israel wikipedia:

    Israeli military officials and analysts have also drawn attention to the experience and weaponry the group would have gained from the involvement of thousands of its fighters in the Syrian Civil War. “This kind of experience cannot be bought,” said Gabi Siboni, director of the military and strategic affairs program at the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University. “It is an additional factor that we will have to deal with. There is no replacement for experience, and it is not to be scoffed at.”[184]

    As I write these lines they are helping the SAA eliminate the last of your jihadi heroes from Aleppo.

    You are an idiot and a liar… totally clueless as to what is happening in Syria.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    There are Russian infantry in Syria, which hardly suggests Assad's large army of Syrians includes many troops he can count on. It is true that the Russians and the Iranian cannon fodder with Russian artillery are winning taking territory from the rebels, but that is mainly because they have not been given US anti aircraft weapons which would make short work of the primitive Russian airplanes. but they don't need rear-area security police to control, a population sympathetic to Assad. The Jihadis will all leave as the rebel areas being taken, so the Russians will win areas that contain almost entirely Syrian civilians , and the Chachens are brought in for false flag attacks , and than to terrorise these helpless defenceless people for the mortal sin of not wanting to be ruled by a family of murdering puppets.

    Assad's dad used Hezbollah to drive the Israelis out of Lebanon and then, masquerading as "Islamic Jihad", to kill hundred of US marines, to great effect. Then Assad junior facilitated the use of Syria by foreign suicide bombers heading for Iraq. Assad wanted to drive the US out by terrorism, an objective his Russian masters no doubt supported. But it turned into an Iraqi Shia-Sunni was and the Sunni radicals were irrepressible, gradually crossing into the Syrian Civil war which was partly a response to Assad junior's economic austerity measures.

    Its just not that easy to overthrow even a secular Arab country with infiltation. Western intelligence and the Saudis couldn't do it in South Yemen. The west has been neutral in all this, which is mainly a non religous Arab persian or Saudi- Iran state quarrel not an internal Syrian secular- verses Islamicist one. But at bottom why should the US support Russian client Assad; because his political incompetence and facilitating of the jihadist killing of US soldiers in Iraq blew up in his face?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RadicalCenter
    Russia should absolutely eradicate the chechens. If sensible and realistic men were running the USA, our government would either stand aside and cheer or even affirmatively help Russia.

    What kind of monster are you? Exterminate, exterminate, it’s like you’re a Dalek from a bad Dr Who episode.

    Russia has played a smart card in Chechnya: “Let the Chechens handle it.” They bought the Kadyrovs fair and square, and, so far at least, the Kadyrovs have been true to their salt (to use an old Great Game-ism). Chechnya today ain’t nothing like late 90s Chechnya, and the change is all for the better.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    Not many people deserve to be exterminated, but Chechens certainly qualify, they combine the worst aspects of blacks and Arabs, produce nothing but crime and terrorism. Putin is using them as mafia enforcers and reallocating billions of dollars from Russian taxpayers to turn Grozny into mini-Dubai. Disgusting.
    ETA: Russians I've talked to say Azeris are actually worse, I'm sure Avery will vouch for this.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Yo Avery,

    A note on Armenian history. Prof. David Nicolle writes that Armenian heavy cavalry and archers (apparently those were their forte) were recorded to have participated on the Muslim side against Byzantines from the earliest centuries. Not surprising actually, the Byzantine policy against variant Christian sects was horrendously short-sighted. The Battle of Manzikert (and subsequent loss of Anatolia) is basically the upshot of centuries of accumulated folly on their borderlands.

    With Chechens, I've seen photos where some of them look like they could be Kurdish or Armenian and some where they could easily be Danish or Belarussian.

    Peace.

    Muslims in that part of the world have been kidnapping pretty northern Euro women (boys too) as sex slaves for a long time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roxelana

    Vlad the Impaler was a prisoner of the Turks as a boy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Sean,

    We're talking about Chechens here so let's get factual...
    1) Historically and geographically speaking, Chechens were never part of the Tatar Khanates. They were a part of the Safavid Empire when they started turning towards Islam, and then annexed by the conquests of the Russian Tsars.
    2) Pretty White women were also being sold by the Varangian Rus for centuries to both Byzantium and Muslim lands - until they decided to quit pretty late in the game:
    “Also valued in the East were the slaves that the Rus captured from among the Eastern European peoples—Slavs, from which English has derived the word slave. According to the itinerant geographer Ibn Hawkal, writing in 977, the Rus slave trade ran “from Spain to Egypt.””
    http://archive.aramcoworld.com/issue/199906/among.the.norse.tribes-the.remarkable.account.of.ibn.fadlan.htm

    “In addition, Kiev also traded with Central and West Asia, establishing commercial relations with the Islamic Empire, supplying slaves from Russia and Central Asia to the Abbasid Caliphate in Baghdad.”
    World History: Journeys from Past to Present

    “Ibn Hawqal, an Arab geographer, described a Viking slave trade in 977 A.D. that extended across the Mediterranean from Spain to Egypt. Others recorded that slaves from northern Europe were funneled from Scandinavia through Russia to Byzantium and Baghdad…Some genetic studies, for example, suggest that a majority of Icelandic women are related to Scottish and Irish ancestors who likely were raid booty.”
    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/12/151228-vikings-slaves-thralls-norse-scandinavia-archaeology/ (Now there's a detailed rendition of a White man selling a White woman to a Muslim merchant.)

    3) The Tatars did indeed do slave-raids into Russia and Tsar Ivan stopped them...hard with little mercy. Or have you never read what happened to Kazan and a few other key Tatar cities and their populations?

    The only thing Chechens (also other Caucasians, etc.) have been historically (we're talking pre-20th century) guilty of is kicking out the Tsar's armies and Russian settlers from their lands and trying to establish their own sovereign state within the Caucasus. You can feel free to cite to me any instance of when they went up the Volga to raid Moscow or St. Petersburg or Kiev. Maybe the only other thing they are guilty of is surviving Stalin's attempt to send their entire population to a miserable cold grave:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1399561/1944-1957-Deportation-and-exile.html

    As far as the current Chechens; I agree with Marcus in that far too many of them are involved in extremist ideology or in international crime.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @L.K
    Idiot. Zusa is the biggest exporter of terrorism in the world and your government covertly supported the Chechen insurgents.

    Assad the elder drove the US and Israel out of Lebanon with Shia suicide bombings, then his son tried the same trick against the US soldiers (real soldiers) in Iraq Syria was the conduit through which the foreign suicide bombers entered Iraq to kill American). Bashir Assad wanted to defend himself against an immanent American attack, which was crap analysis because the US were uninterested in him. However his proxy terrorist didn’t just go for the US occupation force, they began attacking the Sunni who responded in kind and it turned Iraq into a bloodbath Sunni-Shia civil war. Then the Sunni radicals that had been created in Iraq by Assad the younger;s meddling became a major force in the ciil war. The Russians were laughing up their sleeve as US soldiers were being killed by the thousands by their pal Assad’s proxy killers, well they are not laughing now. Their Billy the Puppet regime is going to lose.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rudel
    "the US were uninterested in him"

    "A Clean Break"
    PNAC
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @L.K
    Sean, what universe do u inhabit? Trollstam?

    Btw, only a complete idiot or LIAR could write the following crap about Chechen troops:
    'lack discipline and technical skill and are therefore not soldiers'.

    They are not for front line combat, nor are the Chechen going to Syria for behind the lines suicide missions a la North Korean Commandos. Photos of these units clearly show they are not soldiers and include many men too old to fight anyone who can fight back. They are a death squad for false flag attack a la the 90′s Algerian civil war against the majority by state terror.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @L.K
    Idiot. Zusa is the biggest exporter of terrorism in the world and your government covertly supported the Chechen insurgents.

    Truth. Him and Sean and RC. But where does idiot leave off, and ugly begin?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RadicalCenter
    Sure, Talha, you want muslims to favor muslims, at the expensive of nonmuslims' lives, only when doing so undermines communism.

    Bullshit.

    You are one of the more effective and more (initially) believable apologists for the worshippers of the mentally ill pedophile "prophet", Disgrace be upon him.

    We both know damn well that if you and your coreligionists had the numbers he explained in the USA, I and the rest of the Unz commenters wouldn't be free to write and speak and live as we wish.

    Hey RC,

    Uh no – you don’t get to tell me what I am stating. Let me make it clear…

    Muslims should not be killing anyone in an unjust cause (an invasion of a sovereign country under international law being one of them) – especially their Muslim brethren. The fact that Chechen Muslims were forced to invade Afghanistan (you can go ahead and correct me if you have evidence that the Red Army had an easy way to get on the ‘conscientious objector’ track – LOL) meant that they were part of an aggressing army. The fact that some of them held themselves back from harming their fellow brothers (even risking limb and life) is an honorable thing.

    believable

    You’ve advocated genocide against Muslims on multiple occasions and on multiple ethnic fronts; who cares what you believe?

    Anybody who thinks that the USA with a super-majority Muslim population will operate exactly like it does today is living a pipe dream. Of course anybody who thinks that the USA with a super-majority Jewish or Mormon population will operate exactly like it does today is also living a pipe dream.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Avery
    {Anybody know if that’s true?}

    I don't know everything about my ancestors' history, but haven't heard that one. Looking like one another is not a reliable method to tell who is whose ancestor.

    Armenians officially adopted Christianity in 301AD, about 1,700 years ago.
    The only Armenians who are openly Muslim are Hamshen Armenians (living near Black Sea). They were forcibly converted by nomad Muslim Turk invaders from East and Central Asia when they invaded Armenian Highlands and Asia Minor around 1,000AD. There are also an unknown number of hidden Islamized Armenians in Turkey.

    There is no record in Armenian history about some splitting off and going to Chechnya. Armenians and Chechens are distinct peoples.
    It is possible that 1,000s of years ago when pro-Armenian groupings migrated to Armenian Highlands and South Caucasus, settled down, and coalesced to what became the Armenian people, some groups may have gone on to North Caucasus and settled there. But that's pre-history: hard to tell who is who that far back.

    Yo Avery,

    A note on Armenian history. Prof. David Nicolle writes that Armenian heavy cavalry and archers (apparently those were their forte) were recorded to have participated on the Muslim side against Byzantines from the earliest centuries. Not surprising actually, the Byzantine policy against variant Christian sects was horrendously short-sighted. The Battle of Manzikert (and subsequent loss of Anatolia) is basically the upshot of centuries of accumulated folly on their borderlands.

    With Chechens, I’ve seen photos where some of them look like they could be Kurdish or Armenian and some where they could easily be Danish or Belarussian.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    Muslims in that part of the world have been kidnapping pretty northern Euro women (boys too) as sex slaves for a long time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roxelana

    Vlad the Impaler was a prisoner of the Turks as a boy.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    They may have courage but they lack discipline and technical skill and are therefore not soldiers, but woman-stealing murderers as Russians, having been victims of Chechen depredations for centuries, well know to be worthless except for terror attacks on the helpless.

    Sean, what universe do u inhabit? Trollstam?

    Btw, only a complete idiot or LIAR could write the following crap about Chechen troops:
    ‘lack discipline and technical skill and are therefore not soldiers’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    They are not for front line combat, nor are the Chechen going to Syria for behind the lines suicide missions a la North Korean Commandos. Photos of these units clearly show they are not soldiers and include many men too old to fight anyone who can fight back. They are a death squad for false flag attack a la the 90's Algerian civil war against the majority by state terror.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey RC,

    Yeah - it's called moral principles. You don't participate in an invading force for your "masters" and kill your brothers in faith for Communism. If Christians want to level each other's cities for that stupidity - go for it. Take it up with God when you see Him and explain you were just "following orders" and see if that flies.

    These are the rights of brotherhood; you don't spill each other's blood for an unjust cause.

    Peace.

    I do agree with you that Christians should not be killing each other.

    I also would be glad if all Christians, indeed all nonmuslims, would unite to eradicate Islam enforce it enslaves, impoverishes, and harms us all.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey RC,

    Yeah - it's called moral principles. You don't participate in an invading force for your "masters" and kill your brothers in faith for Communism. If Christians want to level each other's cities for that stupidity - go for it. Take it up with God when you see Him and explain you were just "following orders" and see if that flies.

    These are the rights of brotherhood; you don't spill each other's blood for an unjust cause.

    Peace.

    Sure, Talha, you want muslims to favor muslims, at the expensive of nonmuslims’ lives, only when doing so undermines communism.

    Bullshit.

    You are one of the more effective and more (initially) believable apologists for the worshippers of the mentally ill pedophile “prophet”, Disgrace be upon him.

    We both know damn well that if you and your coreligionists had the numbers he explained in the USA, I and the rest of the Unz commenters wouldn’t be free to write and speak and live as we wish.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey RC,

    Uh no - you don't get to tell me what I am stating. Let me make it clear...

    Muslims should not be killing anyone in an unjust cause (an invasion of a sovereign country under international law being one of them) - especially their Muslim brethren. The fact that Chechen Muslims were forced to invade Afghanistan (you can go ahead and correct me if you have evidence that the Red Army had an easy way to get on the 'conscientious objector' track - LOL) meant that they were part of an aggressing army. The fact that some of them held themselves back from harming their fellow brothers (even risking limb and life) is an honorable thing.

    believable
     
    You've advocated genocide against Muslims on multiple occasions and on multiple ethnic fronts; who cares what you believe?

    Anybody who thinks that the USA with a super-majority Muslim population will operate exactly like it does today is living a pipe dream. Of course anybody who thinks that the USA with a super-majority Jewish or Mormon population will operate exactly like it does today is also living a pipe dream.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    Stalin for all his ruthlessness didn't annihilate them when he had the chance, now Russians are suffering for it. The reasoning for keeping Chechnya in Russia is that it will stop spread of terrorism, but that seems absurd, just expel them all to their homeland (they expelled all ethnic Russians from Chechnya, so it's only fair) and bomb them when they try to export terrorism.

    Idiot. Zusa is the biggest exporter of terrorism in the world and your government covertly supported the Chechen insurgents.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    Truth. Him and Sean and RC. But where does idiot leave off, and ugly begin?
    , @Sean
    Assad the elder drove the US and Israel out of Lebanon with Shia suicide bombings, then his son tried the same trick against the US soldiers (real soldiers) in Iraq Syria was the conduit through which the foreign suicide bombers entered Iraq to kill American). Bashir Assad wanted to defend himself against an immanent American attack, which was crap analysis because the US were uninterested in him. However his proxy terrorist didn't just go for the US occupation force, they began attacking the Sunni who responded in kind and it turned Iraq into a bloodbath Sunni-Shia civil war. Then the Sunni radicals that had been created in Iraq by Assad the younger;s meddling became a major force in the ciil war. The Russians were laughing up their sleeve as US soldiers were being killed by the thousands by their pal Assad's proxy killers, well they are not laughing now. Their Billy the Puppet regime is going to lose.
    , @Marcus
    I'll readily admit the US (and our Anglo cousins) has played a shameful role in supporting Muslims against Christians and others I believe the past.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RadicalCenter
    Let's see, they lied and broke their oath to the Russian people and the people training and paying them, then they let people kill or be killed based on their religion.

    Yes, how admirable.

    You really are a muslim alright.

    And the onus is on you to prove that they made an ‘oath’ to invade other countries as part of some Communist imperialist army and not simply to defend Russian territory. From what I remember, perhaps Avery can correct me, there was mandatory conscription for military-age males in Soviet times – so it’s not like they went to some recruitment center to sign up.

    http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-12894.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RadicalCenter
    Russia should absolutely eradicate the chechens. If sensible and realistic men were running the USA, our government would either stand aside and cheer or even affirmatively help Russia.

    Only a depraved asshole would write about eradicating a Nation from their homeland.

    Your beloved Zamerica supported Chechen separatists in the wars in the Caucasus in order to bring harm to Russia, just like your depraved country, a country that has been at war for more than 90% of its historical existence, wars of choice and empire, has been in bed with radical Islam(Salafism/Waahabism) for many decades. The UK for even longer.

    U.S. Supported Chechen Terrorists

    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/04/u-s-support-chechen-terrorists-fighting-russia-just-like-we-supported-al-qaeda-to-fight-russia.html

    The U.S. is the world’s largest sponsor of terror;

    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/01/by-any-measure-the-u-s-is-the-worlds-largest-sponsor-of-terror.html

    The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom said:

    By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.

    The Washington Post reported in 2010:

    The United States has long been an exporter of terrorism, according to a secret CIA analysis released Wednesday by the Web site WikiLeaks.

    The Chechens’ American friends

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/08/usa.russia

    Allegations are even being made in Russia that the west itself is somehow behind the Chechen rebellion, and that the purpose of such support is to weaken Russia, and to drive her out of the Caucasus. The fact that the Chechens are believed to use as a base the Pankisi gorge in neighbouring Georgia – a country which aspires to join Nato, has an extremely pro-American government, and where the US already has a significant military presence – only encourages such speculation. Putin himself even seemed to lend credence to the idea in his interview with foreign journalists on Monday.

    Chechen Terrorists and the Neocons

    https://consortiumnews.com/2013/04/19/chechen-terrorists-and-the-neocons/

    You assholes and your allies and client states have created all these radical groups, the various al-Ciada outfits, the people who later became the Taliban, ISIS/DAESH, etc..

    In Lybia, some of the key ‘rebel’ fighters were al-qaeda linked or members.

    In Syria the situation is even much worse.
    How the US Armed-up Syrian Jihadists

    http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/09/29/how-us-armed-syrian-jihadists

    …a former Green Beret writes of America’s covert and clandestine programs to train and arm Syrian insurgents, “they know we are just training the next generation of jihadis

    Then you scumbags have the gall to talk about muslim savages and what not!!
    Take a hard look in the mirror first!

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    I oppose the salvages who are born in USA or have white skin, too, and I've actively opposed every us military intervention in my adult lifetime save one. Bother reading my other comments and you'd know that.

    I stand by the view that Islam is inherently savage and that nonmuslims are never safe with large numbers of muslims in or near their (nonmuslims') lands.

    To Hell with islam.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    Stalin for all his ruthlessness didn't annihilate them when he had the chance, now Russians are suffering for it. The reasoning for keeping Chechnya in Russia is that it will stop spread of terrorism, but that seems absurd, just expel them all to their homeland (they expelled all ethnic Russians from Chechnya, so it's only fair) and bomb them when they try to export terrorism.

    Well said.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RadicalCenter
    Actually, Marcus, he did. Tasha said that he respected chechens even more because they let people kill and be killed because of their religion, leaving Christian Russians to die or be injured without the help they were promised by their Chechen "allies".

    The guy can speak of pontiacs all he wants, he is a savage and a perfect example of why we'll shouldn't let muslims into our countries.

    He respects muslims who let Christians die to avoid firing on other muslims. Wonder what he would say if we stated that Christians should not kill other Christians, especially not to save or benefit muslims, and should let muslims die in order to avoid harming Christians on the other side of a battle. Somehow I don't think he'd be okay with that.

    LOL!

    I’m the savage? You are calling for extermination of Chechens in their native land; don’t front as if you are “civilized” because you have air-conditioning and wear ties. You have the mentality of the Mongol Horde – only you wipe you backside with toilet paper.

    Wonder what he would say if we stated that Christians should not kill other Christians…

    They shouldn’t – what do they teach you guys in church? I’d be fine with it – stay the hell out of Muslim lands and you won’t put yourselves in those predicaments. Russians were invaders into Afghanistan – I don’t know of a single Muslim scholar that did not consider it a legitimate jihad; your opinion on it is irrelevant. Anyone wearing a Russian uniform was open game. If you don’t understand that, watch ‘Red Dawn’ – the original. Then watch it again. I’m not asking for any – ANY – non-Muslim intervention in our wars.

    May God bless the Afghans that fought the Russian invasion and may He grant even a higher rank for the Muslims on the other side that lost their lives while holding their hands back from harming their brothers in faith.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RadicalCenter
    Let's see, they lied and broke their oath to the Russian people and the people training and paying them, then they let people kill or be killed based on their religion.

    Yes, how admirable.

    You really are a muslim alright.

    Hey RC,

    Yeah – it’s called moral principles. You don’t participate in an invading force for your “masters” and kill your brothers in faith for Communism. If Christians want to level each other’s cities for that stupidity – go for it. Take it up with God when you see Him and explain you were just “following orders” and see if that flies.

    These are the rights of brotherhood; you don’t spill each other’s blood for an unjust cause.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Sure, Talha, you want muslims to favor muslims, at the expensive of nonmuslims' lives, only when doing so undermines communism.

    Bullshit.

    You are one of the more effective and more (initially) believable apologists for the worshippers of the mentally ill pedophile "prophet", Disgrace be upon him.

    We both know damn well that if you and your coreligionists had the numbers he explained in the USA, I and the rest of the Unz commenters wouldn't be free to write and speak and live as we wish.
    , @RadicalCenter
    I do agree with you that Christians should not be killing each other.

    I also would be glad if all Christians, indeed all nonmuslims, would unite to eradicate Islam enforce it enslaves, impoverishes, and harms us all.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Kirt
    What wild and crazy fun - that's the way weddings should be celebrated! The music sounds Middle Eastern. Chechens look like Armenians. Seems to me I read some place that basically they are Armenians, but split off from the main group by converting to Islam while most Armenians remained Christian. Anybody know if that's true?

    {Anybody know if that’s true?}

    I don’t know everything about my ancestors’ history, but haven’t heard that one. Looking like one another is not a reliable method to tell who is whose ancestor.

    Armenians officially adopted Christianity in 301AD, about 1,700 years ago.
    The only Armenians who are openly Muslim are Hamshen Armenians (living near Black Sea). They were forcibly converted by nomad Muslim Turk invaders from East and Central Asia when they invaded Armenian Highlands and Asia Minor around 1,000AD. There are also an unknown number of hidden Islamized Armenians in Turkey.

    There is no record in Armenian history about some splitting off and going to Chechnya. Armenians and Chechens are distinct peoples.
    It is possible that 1,000s of years ago when pro-Armenian groupings migrated to Armenian Highlands and South Caucasus, settled down, and coalesced to what became the Armenian people, some groups may have gone on to North Caucasus and settled there. But that’s pre-history: hard to tell who is who that far back.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Yo Avery,

    A note on Armenian history. Prof. David Nicolle writes that Armenian heavy cavalry and archers (apparently those were their forte) were recorded to have participated on the Muslim side against Byzantines from the earliest centuries. Not surprising actually, the Byzantine policy against variant Christian sects was horrendously short-sighted. The Battle of Manzikert (and subsequent loss of Anatolia) is basically the upshot of centuries of accumulated folly on their borderlands.

    With Chechens, I've seen photos where some of them look like they could be Kurdish or Armenian and some where they could easily be Danish or Belarussian.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.