The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / On "Black Lives Matter"
 All Comments / On "Black Lives Matter"
    Encountering almost daily criticisms of the police by Pathologically Virtuous Whites of the sort one finds at Salon and NPR, many of these criticisms being nonsensical, I find myself wanting to ask these unpleasantly nice people: Do you know any cops? Have you ever known any? I mean known them well enough to have a...
  • @SteveRogers42
    Is this a remake of Demolition Man?

    https://twitter.com/EngageTheRebels/status/903216388000673793?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fheartiste.wordpress.com%2F2017%2F09%2F01%2Fthe-reflexive-retreat-to-pretty-lies%2F
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Headline on Drudge. THUGS OF CHARLOTTE WHITE MAN DRAGGED, BEATEN BEGGING FOR MERCY Just another day at the Exceptional Nation. Racial attacks, racial threats, looting, burning. When I am politically upset, I loot stores. Don’t you? It is worth understanding what we deal with. The video makes it clear. The rioters grow in imagination. This...
  • They can’t count, and if they did they would be very afraid.

    If other feel threatened, they would vanish like the morning mist.

    They do not understand that when you don’t contribute, you are expendable.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @El Dato
    Meanwhile, calls for reparations:

    U.S. owes black people reparations for a history of ‘racial terrorism,’ says U.N. panel

    At the invitation of the Government of the United States of America, the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent undertook a visit to the United States from 19 to 29 January 2016. The members of the delegation were Mireille Fanon Mendès-France, Sabelo Gumedze and Ricardo Sunga III.

    The Working Group visited Washington, D.C.; Baltimore, Maryland; Jackson,
    Mississippi; Chicago, Illinois; and New York City. The Working Group met with
    representatives of several government departments and offices, including the Department of State, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Labor, the Department of Justice and the Environmental Protection Agency. The Working Group also met with officials of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, in Washington, D.C.


    While the report raises some valid points especially in relation to the excesses of the Prison-Industrial Complex, these are buried under sillyness like:

    The Working Group encourages Congress to pass H.R. 40 — the Commission
    to Study Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act — which would establish a
    commission to examine enslavement and racial discrimination in the colonies and the United States from 1619 to the present and to recommend appropriate remedies. The Working Group urges the United States to consider seriously applying analogous elements contained in the Caribbean Community’s Ten-Point Action Plan on Reparations, which includes a formal apology, health initiatives, educational opportunities, an African knowledge programme, psychological rehabilitation, technology transfer and financial support, and debt cancellation.


    This is going to be a Red Flag to all sort of talking heads.

    When the topic of reparations arises, I am always perplexed by several things:

    the willful disregard for the myriad social support efforts that have been devised to help poor blacks (e.g., rent support, food subsidy, utility subsidies, free medical care, jobs programs, after school programs, Head Start, free school meals, twelve years of free public education, millions of dollars spent trying to overcome the black white achievement gap, special scholarships, affirmative action…all created and paid for by their white neighbors);

    the complete lack of context in regard to the origination of the slave trade itself (namely that it was a normal part of African culture and the alternative was complete annihilation by your enemies);

    and the generally dismal state of black cultural achievement everywhere and at all times (need I remind anyone that black Africans did not even have a written language and had not even invented the wheel by the time the Europeans arrived?).

    If the Nazi’s are found to have stolen a Jewish family’s priceless artwork, that represents a reasonable claim against the Nazis. But what is the basis for black African slave reparations? Individuals who were captured and sold by other black Africans to whites were certainly better off than the individuals who were killed outright or sold to Arabs, castrated, and then worked to death. The prospects of the descendants of slaves living in America are certainly much better than the prospects of their ancestors still living in the mother country. What have they lost exactly?

    The individual slaves (who, btw, have long been dead) would seem to have a claim against other black Africans for enslaving them. Slavery had existed for thousands of years and wasn’t particular to any one civilization. It was legal to purchase slaves at the time that Americans were purchasing them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The passing of an era is barely noticed when it actually occurs. It's hard to imagine millions waking up one morning and celebrating the arrival of the Age of Enlightenment let alone the birth of the Renaissance. A similar demarcation has occurred regarding the Civil Rights movement. To condense a long story, with the end...
  • @Alden
    It’s true that the anchor babies stole the equal rights of Americans.

    I beg to differ…it was those of “the greatest generation” who foisted the misguided and deadly “civil-rights” laws, “affirmative action” laws and third-world immigration invitation laws on us. This “greatest generation” also used federal troops and the threat of federal prosecution to enforce civil-rights laws on white Americans…
    Regards,

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @wayfarer
    "Illegal Immigration Hurts Black Men Most"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eru5lJr35yQ

    "Immigrants Steal African-Americans' 14th Amendment 'Birthright' "
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8d9qBXrEYTc

    It’s true that the anchor babies stole the equal rights of Americans.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    I beg to differ...it was those of "the greatest generation" who foisted the misguided and deadly "civil-rights" laws, "affirmative action" laws and third-world immigration invitation laws on us. This "greatest generation" also used federal troops and the threat of federal prosecution to enforce civil-rights laws on white Americans...
    Regards,
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wally
    But don't ya know:

    "White folks was in the caves while we [blacks] was building empires … We built pyramids before Donald Trump ever knew what architecture was … we taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it."
    -- Al Sharpton

    Sharpton got that from a book of lies and falsehood propaganda titled “ Black Athena”. It was written by a Jew professor named Bernal at Ivy League Cornell. Every word was a lie and easily refuted

    But it became a best seller and every college prof in the land believes every word

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anarchyst
    ...it will NEVER be enough for blacks...both special "civil-rights (for some)" laws and "affirmative action", contract set-asides, scholarships for blacks only, and all other preferences based solely on race will still be around a hundred years from now. By the politicians allowing this sorry excuse for a race, this dysfunctional minority to dictate to us whites, destroying OUR history, they are prodding a "sleeping giant". PUSHBACK IS COMING. The racial hatred that blacks have for us whites is self-destructive and will do them no good. Whatever happened to "equality of opportunity?? It has been replaced with "equality of results" (quotas) which NEVER works.

    One can but hope that pushback is coming. I’ve been looking for a counter revolution for decades. It’s nice to think about, but I doubt it will ever happen.

    The core of the problem is the unelected judiciary at every level. Getting the judiciary under control of the elected executive branch is the only way Whites can save ourselves from extermination

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "You are awesome at not answering direct questions."

    I answered the questions posed. You are just not fond of the responses.

    "Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word."

    I will feel free to give whatever response I chose, considering the questions posed require other than simplistic answers. Just because your wife bosses you around does not mean you can take out your frustrations on this fine blog.

    "1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people?"

    Races exist. Race is biological, but it is also a human construct. It took someone to "label" it. For example, the California spotted owl is an animal. The name of the creature is a human designation—strix occidentalis. That is, binomial nomenclature refers to a formal system, developed by people, to name things, in this case a species. The California owl was not a “California owl” until someone actually and specifically attached a name to it. Likewise, races were labeled in such a fashion.

    "2. Do you believe that genetics play a role – a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada – in IQ and other behavioral traits?"

    As I stated before, genetics and environmental factors play a role in behavioral traits. It's just that there is argument as to which is more influential AND whether certain races undeniably possess particular traits generally due to those factors, like high IQ or high time preferences.

    "3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?"

    Of course traits are capable of being inherited or of passing by inheritance. Again, there has been significant controversy in the scientific community about the heritability of specific characteristics.

    "4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups – assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races?"

    There are racial and ethnic disparities say, for example, in health status that are genetically based.

    "5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live."

    It would appear environmental and cultural attributes, as well as genetic factors, are involved in long-term adaptation to high altitude.

    6. Do you believe any race is “superior” in the eyes of God?

    The human race is what most matters.

    Actually, it’s not The California Spotted Owl. They were always called spotted owls and they live all over the country.

    It was just a dispute between a Goldman Sachs subsidiary clear cutting lumber company and environmentalists wishing to preserve the redwood forests in California that made the spotted owl famous.

    You are as ignorant about owls as you are about crime and who commits most of it

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "I knew that you couldn’t do it. (My apologies for setting a trap. I really did hope that you would prove to be an honest man.)"

    Of course I am being honest, as I realized your game playing, which is exactly why I offered more substantial responses. Your questions required it.

    You lose.

    You are not going to convince anyone here who has really experienced blacks that honesty about blacks is racism.

    So why keep posting? You remind me of every Jewish liberal I’ve ever known. It’s just the standard propaganda instilled in liberals. It’s like kids reciting the pledge of allegiance or some standard salesman’s spiel or prayers in church.

    You memorized the propaganda long ago and can type it without even thinking. I’ve heard it all my life.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor’s 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison."

    Made up experiences. Carry on...

    My son in laws Grandfather had a son. When he was 19 he went to Los Angeles for some reason. A month later he was beaten to death by a gang of blacks.
    This happened in the late 1940’s.

    30 years later my kids formed their opinion of black kids just from riding city buses with them. It was only about 6 blocks before the blacks got off at their school bus stop but my kids observed and heard the screeching, cursing, howling and yowling. And the black girls had babies they brought to the school day care center.

    I suppose it’s vicious racism for 11 and 12 year old White girls to disapprove of 14 and 15 year old black girls with their illegitimate babies.

    But it was the filthy language and howling and yowling that really shocked my kids.

    It’s not just the crime, the destruction of our great cities and affirmative action that causes all other races to dislike blacks.

    It’s their behavior in public. Other races behave differently. Some like Mexican Indians stay quietly in their own space. Some like Persians and Armenians do subtle pushing and shoving. Whites sometimes talk too loudly.

    But no other race exhibits the horrible behavior of blacks in public. They can be heard 2 blocks away over heavy traffic. They constantly step backwards, forwards and sideways, arms and legs flailing about taking up as much space as possible.

    They need to look at themselves.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding."

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.

    Blacks always had equal rights in Ohio, Michigan, New York, Illinois. Wisconsin, California and other states north of the Mason Dixon line.

    And look what they did to vast sections of NYC, Akron, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Gary, Chicago, Milwaukee and even Kenosha and Waukegan, Los Angeles, Sacramento and San Francisco.

    Sometimes it took 20 years, sometimes only 10 years before blacks totally destroyed vast sections of those cities. But never more than 20 years.

    I read your arguments in my parents library 60 years ago and got the full propaganda blast in a few college courses. Lucky for me, in the olden days only required sociology and a few other courses taught by commie profs were pro black anti White propaganda.

    Your argument is as old as I am. And it’s all liberal propaganda falsehoods.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Brabantian
    What's missing from the multiple good points made in this article, is the fact that the progressive / leftist incoherence and chaos, is quite oligarch-orchestrated ... as are, e.g., the injustices of the system which are indeed unfairly jailing many minorities for non-violent crimes, plus railroading many minorities into prison via a totally skewered prosecutorial - legal system ... this is not to deny the levels of minority crime, but to point out that the oligarchs have purposefully created a 'justice' system which is an utter farce and in which tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands, are coerced into 'plea bargains' for crimes they personally did not commit

    Chaos and injustice are the oligarch agenda, and the oligarchs' media arms specifically sponsor this as much as the rigged and corrupt United States courts and lawyers ... it is the crazy, corrupt, messed-up organisations which get the media support and funding sponsorship, and that is a core aspect of the game ... set the lower classes against one another, and forever distract from the oligarchs pulling the strings behind the scenes

    It is not a simple matter to address the real problem ... It is hard for most people to digest what is happening, as they are suffering from in-your-face ugly serious life issues, whereas the oligarch string-pullers are distant, hidden and 'theoretical' ... versus the street crime in your face, or your minority family member or friend getting railroaded and jailed

    It’s so obvious you know absolutely nothing about crime, criminals and the criminal justice system other than what you read is some naive pro criminal publication by some lying liberal.

    You don’t even know what plea bargain means do you? Almost all crimes committed are not just one crime but at least 2 usually more than 2 crimes.

    For instance a basic robbery often involves a weapon and a physical attack on the victim which injures the victim. A huge number of rapes happen after the criminal has broken and entered and invaded the victim’s home.

    So the criminal is charged with the several crimes he committed. The criminal then admits guilt of the least serious crime

    Thus instead of getting what he actually deserves, a lengthy sentence for armed robbery with a weapon and serious bodily injury to the victim, the criminal admits guilt only to simple robbery and gets probation and a very short sentence such as one year. Another thing you don’t know about is “ time off for good behavior”
    That means that every prison sentence is automatically cut in half unless the criminal Jill’s someone in prison and has to serve his full sentence.
    You’ve obviously been reading some liberal falsehoods about plea bargains written by a pro criminal ideologue

    Murder 1 often becomes man slaughter or even involuntary manslaughter. A well known case Re that is going on right now in San Francisco. The illegal alien felon who murdered Kate Stienle claims he just sat down on a bench. A gun was just lying there. He just touched the gun and the gun went off by itself killing Ms Stienle.

    The murderer claims involuntary manslaughter. But it was really homicide 2.

    You really should look to the source of what you read. If you’re in law school, 6 months as a public defender will cure you of your naive and ignorant beliefs about plea bargains.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @joef

    It’s all a ruse,
     
    If you said it is a ruse by corporatist/neocons helping to instigate racial fears, in the working/middle class, so they will vote Republican; and this is done in order to have a free hand in cheap labor, environmental pollution, and military industrial complex wars (that are not in our national interest), I can somewhat agree with you... however, that does not mean that leftist/afros are innocent of misconduct (by inciting their own leftist hostilities against the working/middle class, the corporatist neocons have an easier sell).

    Basically once side wants to always pay min wage, and the other side wants to tax every cent of it earned, so either way the middle/working class economically losses. Although I do have a particular disdain for hypocritical limo libs who claim to be anti corporatist, but have an investment portfolio with them, and do not mind that the Clinton's make high paid speeches at Goldman Sachs, while limo libs lecture the rest of us on white privilege (yet reside in elitist neighborhoods).

    Not bad.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Truth
    It's all a ruse, Sport. we are making you feel comforatable with our darker skinned Brothers in the mean time, then, when the signal to knee-grows is given...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2c32SvJf54

    It’s all a ruse,

    If you said it is a ruse by corporatist/neocons helping to instigate racial fears, in the working/middle class, so they will vote Republican; and this is done in order to have a free hand in cheap labor, environmental pollution, and military industrial complex wars (that are not in our national interest), I can somewhat agree with you… however, that does not mean that leftist/afros are innocent of misconduct (by inciting their own leftist hostilities against the working/middle class, the corporatist neocons have an easier sell).

    Basically once side wants to always pay min wage, and the other side wants to tax every cent of it earned, so either way the middle/working class economically losses. Although I do have a particular disdain for hypocritical limo libs who claim to be anti corporatist, but have an investment portfolio with them, and do not mind that the Clinton’s make high paid speeches at Goldman Sachs, while limo libs lecture the rest of us on white privilege (yet reside in elitist neighborhoods).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Not bad.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Thanks…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sin City Milla
    My experience with blacks in Africa was that they were almost entirely polite, hard working, n had no ideology of victim hood. When they come here they are surprised by the sense of entitlement n laziness of many American blacks. At least that's what they tell me.

    It’s all a ruse, Sport. we are making you feel comforatable with our darker skinned Brothers in the mean time, then, when the signal to knee-grows is given…

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    It’s all a ruse,
     
    If you said it is a ruse by corporatist/neocons helping to instigate racial fears, in the working/middle class, so they will vote Republican; and this is done in order to have a free hand in cheap labor, environmental pollution, and military industrial complex wars (that are not in our national interest), I can somewhat agree with you... however, that does not mean that leftist/afros are innocent of misconduct (by inciting their own leftist hostilities against the working/middle class, the corporatist neocons have an easier sell).

    Basically once side wants to always pay min wage, and the other side wants to tax every cent of it earned, so either way the middle/working class economically losses. Although I do have a particular disdain for hypocritical limo libs who claim to be anti corporatist, but have an investment portfolio with them, and do not mind that the Clinton's make high paid speeches at Goldman Sachs, while limo libs lecture the rest of us on white privilege (yet reside in elitist neighborhoods).

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @joef

    so I have black friends who are good kind people
     
    Yes, my experience with Sub Saharan African immigrants is mostly a positive one. I find them productive, pleasant, and civilized. They are nothing like afro americans, and many of the Sub Saharan African immigrants I met, do not have respect for the chronic complaining of afro americans. They explain what afro americans call poverty, is luxury in their home country (that there are no overweight poor people in Africa). And what is a further contradiction is that afro americans do not treat African immigrants kindly (with even other Blacks being subjected to afro american unfettered hatreds).

    My experience with blacks in Africa was that they were almost entirely polite, hard working, n had no ideology of victim hood. When they come here they are surprised by the sense of entitlement n laziness of many American blacks. At least that’s what they tell me.

    Read More
    • Agree: joef
    • Replies: @Truth
    It's all a ruse, Sport. we are making you feel comforatable with our darker skinned Brothers in the mean time, then, when the signal to knee-grows is given...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2c32SvJf54
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "Taking a knee" stands for the specter of beefy, pampered athletes—they're not sportsmen—wealthy beyond belief, striking a political pose on the football field, during the playing of the national anthem. First to kneel when he was meant to stand was Colin Kaepernick. The reason the San Francisco 49er knelt, in 2016: "I am not going...
  • overpaid adolescent nfl players grow up
    here are some real men taking the knee;

    http://thechive.com/2014/11/23/security-halt-go-ahead-and-take-a-knee-36-photos/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The passing of an era is barely noticed when it actually occurs. It's hard to imagine millions waking up one morning and celebrating the arrival of the Age of Enlightenment let alone the birth of the Renaissance. A similar demarcation has occurred regarding the Civil Rights movement. To condense a long story, with the end...
  • @Langley
    'African Americans continue to have the highest incidence, prevalence and mortality rates from chronic diseases like cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity, and issues like HIV/AIDS continue to overwhelm the Black community more so than any other racial or ethnic group.”

    The above are caused by behavior and genetics. Not Evil White Men.

    "Who would have predicted all the fuss about statues of Robert E. Lee or that professional football players could occupy center stage in a public discussion over racial inequality? Or that black actors would demand Oscars by racial quota? Moreover, the openness of American politics makes it crackpot friendly, a condition reinforced by a novelty obsessed mass media and the material rewards awaiting the next Al Sharpton."

    William Luther Pierce?

    I think we should let blacks always go first through stop signs even if last to arrive. After all, letting the first to arrive go first is just White Privilege. This won’t be too much of a problem. At every stop sign the drivers can exit their vehicles, categorize each other by race by measuring their respective degrees of melanin, peacefully conclude who should go through the stop sign first, then calmly proceed in the correct order. After all, this merely applies the logic of affirmative action, dictated by our enlightened n unbiased Supreme Court. This approach has worked so well in academia n business for the 60 years that the Court in its wisdom has decided to make it permanent. Only white racists could possibly object.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sin City Milla
    You're quite right. That very thing happened to me. Kids overprotected, inoculated by PC propaganda against hearing new facts or science. I myself am an American nationalist but with global interests, I served on trade delegations to several African countries, so I have black friends who are good kind people, but other black delegates I learned were 100% white haters who loudly stated that "nothing had changed" since the days of slavery. These included the black college professor n the black city officials n the elected (by blacks) city councilman. It is clear that they were mostly Black Nationalists who considered American Nationalists as their mortal enemy.

    so I have black friends who are good kind people

    Yes, my experience with Sub Saharan African immigrants is mostly a positive one. I find them productive, pleasant, and civilized. They are nothing like afro americans, and many of the Sub Saharan African immigrants I met, do not have respect for the chronic complaining of afro americans. They explain what afro americans call poverty, is luxury in their home country (that there are no overweight poor people in Africa). And what is a further contradiction is that afro americans do not treat African immigrants kindly (with even other Blacks being subjected to afro american unfettered hatreds).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sin City Milla
    My experience with blacks in Africa was that they were almost entirely polite, hard working, n had no ideology of victim hood. When they come here they are surprised by the sense of entitlement n laziness of many American blacks. At least that's what they tell me.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sin City Milla
    One more that I missed: my brother in law was run over by a black guy. Several blacks witnessed it but when the police arrived they lied n said he had walked against the light which wasn't true. So he had no case n spent several months in a wheelchair.

    No one is so blind as he who will not see.

    Made up experiences. Carry on…

    Of course that accusation is nothing but projection. No one makes up more made up experiences than afro americans with myths of oppression (while living off the fat of the land for the last 50 years with runaway entitlements), and accusations of nonexistent white privilege. I guess all the crime in the FBI uniform crime reporting (and news reports) is just made up as well, or maybe it was just committed by an unknown invisible force, and people Asians/Hispanics/Whites) just claimed it was done by Blacks because of racism?

    This leftist Orwellian denial of the truth cannot prevail against people who had real experience in these matters (you cannot deny your own true life experience when you, & others, know them to be true)… thus, the above statement was really meant for the pathologically naive White person who is always looking for an excuse to give the benefit of the doubt for extreme afro misbehavior.

    But one day, when national bankruptcy looms, and there is no more to give to the ungrateful afro, the luxury of the benefit of the doubt will no longer exist. Racial balkanization plus a deep economic crash equals major unrest. Without a thriving welfare system, the resultant afro initiated race war will leave two options for whitey: fight or die. We did not want this, it is the afro who keeps pushing the nation towards this direction; and it is they who can stop it, by not destroying the social capital of this nation (unfortunately they are too obsessed with hating whitey, and getting something for nothing, for them to change now).

    Afros, (as well as liberals & leftist) have a very immature economic outlook, believing they can get an infinite free lunch from a bottomless economic well forever. But when the economic well finally runs dry, we will all suffer the consequences, from our past attempts to appease unreasonable afro demands. Either afros become productive citizens, or they will be responsible for the economic bring down of the nation, by grossly exceeding their carrying capacity. And when that happens, it will be clear who is responsible for it (no more excuses for the afros then).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @joef
    Yes, you have a substantial experience in racial reality that polite company refuses to acknowledge, and to which most afros consider it pay back time for the misbegotten gains of fake white privilege. Me myself, and most of the Whites/Hispanics I grew up with, have had similar bad experiences (as most others in the boswash/rustbelt city neighborhoods) Despite my neighborhood responding back with street justice, there was a long retreat from white flight, to the eventual afro ruination of the neighborhoods.

    The unfortunate effect from this is now the children of these white fight refugees have no idea what their parents escaped from. The first mistake of the white flight refugees was to allow the suburban school system to inculcate their children in white guilt propaganda. Many of these pathologically naive millennials now must relearn, what we already learned before at a great price. By shielding them, we actually made them more vulnerable to afro aggression, scams, and falsehoods.

    I remember when they desegregated my middle school by federal mandate in the late 70s. The afros were already 14 to 18, while we were 11 to 13, years of age. Guns and drugs were brought to school. Kids were routinely robbed at knife point, or gang assaulted, and the only response by the school administration was "if you make up that racist story again about you being robbed, we will suspend you!". Of course the school system did not want to be in contempt of Federal court, so they made it work at our expense, even when it disrupted their primary mission of providing an academic education.

    The result was what I lost in formal education, I made up in becoming very street smart in racial realism. The second result was I readily dismissed the nonsense peddled by the MSM, & academics (who pontificate from afar), about how the afros were victims of oppression. And the other result is that I became suspicious of official govt statements, knowing that they are willing to lie to keep this racial afro fraud going (no matter the economic cost, and the amount of non afro victims generated).

    Of course the demands are for us to deny our own experiences, and to ignore afro antisocial/parasitical behavior, claiming that it will get better. And of course for the last 50 years it has only gotten much much worse. I do not believe this nation will survive another 50 years of this, and when every metro area is in economic default, full of urban decay, it will be too late to correct.

    If the afros are figuratively at our throats now, when we are giving them everything, what will happen when we can no longer afford to pay for it? The answer is clear except to the polite company who chooses to ignore it, and claim we are the actual problem instead. The problem of daily afro domestic terrorism is our biggest national crisis, and everything else in comparison is just mere distraction. We did not choose for this to happen, the afros did (and if they choose to: undo) ; all we can do is make the appropriate responses (which right now we are collectively unwilling to do).

    You’re quite right. That very thing happened to me. Kids overprotected, inoculated by PC propaganda against hearing new facts or science. I myself am an American nationalist but with global interests, I served on trade delegations to several African countries, so I have black friends who are good kind people, but other black delegates I learned were 100% white haters who loudly stated that “nothing had changed” since the days of slavery. These included the black college professor n the black city officials n the elected (by blacks) city councilman. It is clear that they were mostly Black Nationalists who considered American Nationalists as their mortal enemy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    so I have black friends who are good kind people
     
    Yes, my experience with Sub Saharan African immigrants is mostly a positive one. I find them productive, pleasant, and civilized. They are nothing like afro americans, and many of the Sub Saharan African immigrants I met, do not have respect for the chronic complaining of afro americans. They explain what afro americans call poverty, is luxury in their home country (that there are no overweight poor people in Africa). And what is a further contradiction is that afro americans do not treat African immigrants kindly (with even other Blacks being subjected to afro american unfettered hatreds).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor’s 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison."

    Made up experiences. Carry on...

    One more that I missed: my brother in law was run over by a black guy. Several blacks witnessed it but when the police arrived they lied n said he had walked against the light which wasn’t true. So he had no case n spent several months in a wheelchair.

    No one is so blind as he who will not see.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    Made up experiences. Carry on…
     
    Of course that accusation is nothing but projection. No one makes up more made up experiences than afro americans with myths of oppression (while living off the fat of the land for the last 50 years with runaway entitlements), and accusations of nonexistent white privilege. I guess all the crime in the FBI uniform crime reporting (and news reports) is just made up as well, or maybe it was just committed by an unknown invisible force, and people Asians/Hispanics/Whites) just claimed it was done by Blacks because of racism?

    This leftist Orwellian denial of the truth cannot prevail against people who had real experience in these matters (you cannot deny your own true life experience when you, & others, know them to be true)... thus, the above statement was really meant for the pathologically naive White person who is always looking for an excuse to give the benefit of the doubt for extreme afro misbehavior.

    But one day, when national bankruptcy looms, and there is no more to give to the ungrateful afro, the luxury of the benefit of the doubt will no longer exist. Racial balkanization plus a deep economic crash equals major unrest. Without a thriving welfare system, the resultant afro initiated race war will leave two options for whitey: fight or die. We did not want this, it is the afro who keeps pushing the nation towards this direction; and it is they who can stop it, by not destroying the social capital of this nation (unfortunately they are too obsessed with hating whitey, and getting something for nothing, for them to change now).

    Afros, (as well as liberals & leftist) have a very immature economic outlook, believing they can get an infinite free lunch from a bottomless economic well forever. But when the economic well finally runs dry, we will all suffer the consequences, from our past attempts to appease unreasonable afro demands. Either afros become productive citizens, or they will be responsible for the economic bring down of the nation, by grossly exceeding their carrying capacity. And when that happens, it will be clear who is responsible for it (no more excuses for the afros then).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sin City Milla
    "Pursuing black equal rights" is nothing but a delusion of the uninformed imperial elitists of Washington n the northeast, n always has been. Whites in the south, n in the working classes of the rest of the US, have always had to defend tbemselves from a steady onslaught of black crime that the elite controlled media have always attempted to suppress.

    Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor's 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison.

    Most of these are not reported because everyone knows its a waste of time n the accused will soon just be back on the street. This is the permanent state of siege that the elites in Washington have forced on the south n on the white working class in this country n which the media actively silences. We know that the government is alien n useless n that we have no defense but our own guns. If it weren't for blacks, we would have almost no violent crime at all.

    Now that you are now better informed than before, maybe you can re-evaluate your opinions.

    “Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor’s 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison.”

    Made up experiences. Carry on…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sin City Milla
    One more that I missed: my brother in law was run over by a black guy. Several blacks witnessed it but when the police arrived they lied n said he had walked against the light which wasn't true. So he had no case n spent several months in a wheelchair.

    No one is so blind as he who will not see.
    , @Alden
    My son in laws Grandfather had a son. When he was 19 he went to Los Angeles for some reason. A month later he was beaten to death by a gang of blacks.
    This happened in the late 1940’s.

    30 years later my kids formed their opinion of black kids just from riding city buses with them. It was only about 6 blocks before the blacks got off at their school bus stop but my kids observed and heard the screeching, cursing, howling and yowling. And the black girls had babies they brought to the school day care center.

    I suppose it’s vicious racism for 11 and 12 year old White girls to disapprove of 14 and 15 year old black girls with their illegitimate babies.

    But it was the filthy language and howling and yowling that really shocked my kids.

    It’s not just the crime, the destruction of our great cities and affirmative action that causes all other races to dislike blacks.

    It’s their behavior in public. Other races behave differently. Some like Mexican Indians stay quietly in their own space. Some like Persians and Armenians do subtle pushing and shoving. Whites sometimes talk too loudly.

    But no other race exhibits the horrible behavior of blacks in public. They can be heard 2 blocks away over heavy traffic. They constantly step backwards, forwards and sideways, arms and legs flailing about taking up as much space as possible.

    They need to look at themselves.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sin City Milla
    "Pursuing black equal rights" is nothing but a delusion of the uninformed imperial elitists of Washington n the northeast, n always has been. Whites in the south, n in the working classes of the rest of the US, have always had to defend tbemselves from a steady onslaught of black crime that the elite controlled media have always attempted to suppress.

    Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor's 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison.

    Most of these are not reported because everyone knows its a waste of time n the accused will soon just be back on the street. This is the permanent state of siege that the elites in Washington have forced on the south n on the white working class in this country n which the media actively silences. We know that the government is alien n useless n that we have no defense but our own guns. If it weren't for blacks, we would have almost no violent crime at all.

    Now that you are now better informed than before, maybe you can re-evaluate your opinions.

    Yes, you have a substantial experience in racial reality that polite company refuses to acknowledge, and to which most afros consider it pay back time for the misbegotten gains of fake white privilege. Me myself, and most of the Whites/Hispanics I grew up with, have had similar bad experiences (as most others in the boswash/rustbelt city neighborhoods) Despite my neighborhood responding back with street justice, there was a long retreat from white flight, to the eventual afro ruination of the neighborhoods.

    The unfortunate effect from this is now the children of these white fight refugees have no idea what their parents escaped from. The first mistake of the white flight refugees was to allow the suburban school system to inculcate their children in white guilt propaganda. Many of these pathologically naive millennials now must relearn, what we already learned before at a great price. By shielding them, we actually made them more vulnerable to afro aggression, scams, and falsehoods.

    I remember when they desegregated my middle school by federal mandate in the late 70s. The afros were already 14 to 18, while we were 11 to 13, years of age. Guns and drugs were brought to school. Kids were routinely robbed at knife point, or gang assaulted, and the only response by the school administration was “if you make up that racist story again about you being robbed, we will suspend you!”. Of course the school system did not want to be in contempt of Federal court, so they made it work at our expense, even when it disrupted their primary mission of providing an academic education.

    The result was what I lost in formal education, I made up in becoming very street smart in racial realism. The second result was I readily dismissed the nonsense peddled by the MSM, & academics (who pontificate from afar), about how the afros were victims of oppression. And the other result is that I became suspicious of official govt statements, knowing that they are willing to lie to keep this racial afro fraud going (no matter the economic cost, and the amount of non afro victims generated).

    Of course the demands are for us to deny our own experiences, and to ignore afro antisocial/parasitical behavior, claiming that it will get better. And of course for the last 50 years it has only gotten much much worse. I do not believe this nation will survive another 50 years of this, and when every metro area is in economic default, full of urban decay, it will be too late to correct.

    If the afros are figuratively at our throats now, when we are giving them everything, what will happen when we can no longer afford to pay for it? The answer is clear except to the polite company who chooses to ignore it, and claim we are the actual problem instead. The problem of daily afro domestic terrorism is our biggest national crisis, and everything else in comparison is just mere distraction. We did not choose for this to happen, the afros did (and if they choose to: undo) ; all we can do is make the appropriate responses (which right now we are collectively unwilling to do).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sin City Milla
    You're quite right. That very thing happened to me. Kids overprotected, inoculated by PC propaganda against hearing new facts or science. I myself am an American nationalist but with global interests, I served on trade delegations to several African countries, so I have black friends who are good kind people, but other black delegates I learned were 100% white haters who loudly stated that "nothing had changed" since the days of slavery. These included the black college professor n the black city officials n the elected (by blacks) city councilman. It is clear that they were mostly Black Nationalists who considered American Nationalists as their mortal enemy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding."

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.

    “Pursuing black equal rights” is nothing but a delusion of the uninformed imperial elitists of Washington n the northeast, n always has been. Whites in the south, n in the working classes of the rest of the US, have always had to defend tbemselves from a steady onslaught of black crime that the elite controlled media have always attempted to suppress.

    Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor’s 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison.

    Most of these are not reported because everyone knows its a waste of time n the accused will soon just be back on the street. This is the permanent state of siege that the elites in Washington have forced on the south n on the white working class in this country n which the media actively silences. We know that the government is alien n useless n that we have no defense but our own guns. If it weren’t for blacks, we would have almost no violent crime at all.

    Now that you are now better informed than before, maybe you can re-evaluate your opinions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    Yes, you have a substantial experience in racial reality that polite company refuses to acknowledge, and to which most afros consider it pay back time for the misbegotten gains of fake white privilege. Me myself, and most of the Whites/Hispanics I grew up with, have had similar bad experiences (as most others in the boswash/rustbelt city neighborhoods) Despite my neighborhood responding back with street justice, there was a long retreat from white flight, to the eventual afro ruination of the neighborhoods.

    The unfortunate effect from this is now the children of these white fight refugees have no idea what their parents escaped from. The first mistake of the white flight refugees was to allow the suburban school system to inculcate their children in white guilt propaganda. Many of these pathologically naive millennials now must relearn, what we already learned before at a great price. By shielding them, we actually made them more vulnerable to afro aggression, scams, and falsehoods.

    I remember when they desegregated my middle school by federal mandate in the late 70s. The afros were already 14 to 18, while we were 11 to 13, years of age. Guns and drugs were brought to school. Kids were routinely robbed at knife point, or gang assaulted, and the only response by the school administration was "if you make up that racist story again about you being robbed, we will suspend you!". Of course the school system did not want to be in contempt of Federal court, so they made it work at our expense, even when it disrupted their primary mission of providing an academic education.

    The result was what I lost in formal education, I made up in becoming very street smart in racial realism. The second result was I readily dismissed the nonsense peddled by the MSM, & academics (who pontificate from afar), about how the afros were victims of oppression. And the other result is that I became suspicious of official govt statements, knowing that they are willing to lie to keep this racial afro fraud going (no matter the economic cost, and the amount of non afro victims generated).

    Of course the demands are for us to deny our own experiences, and to ignore afro antisocial/parasitical behavior, claiming that it will get better. And of course for the last 50 years it has only gotten much much worse. I do not believe this nation will survive another 50 years of this, and when every metro area is in economic default, full of urban decay, it will be too late to correct.

    If the afros are figuratively at our throats now, when we are giving them everything, what will happen when we can no longer afford to pay for it? The answer is clear except to the polite company who chooses to ignore it, and claim we are the actual problem instead. The problem of daily afro domestic terrorism is our biggest national crisis, and everything else in comparison is just mere distraction. We did not choose for this to happen, the afros did (and if they choose to: undo) ; all we can do is make the appropriate responses (which right now we are collectively unwilling to do).

    , @Corvinus
    "Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor’s 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison."

    Made up experiences. Carry on...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    I seem to remember Thomas Sowell writing that the Federal Government has been tracking labor force participation since 1954 and that black men, women and teenagers were more likely to be in the workface than whites and that the rates have declined since then.

    There was a Chicago Tribune article about it a few years ago. In the 1950s, blacks had a slightly higher labor force participation rate than blacks..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country
    I knew that you couldn't do it. (My apologies for setting a trap. I really did hope that you would prove to be an honest man.)

    Farewell, Corny.

    “I knew that you couldn’t do it. (My apologies for setting a trap. I really did hope that you would prove to be an honest man.)”

    Of course I am being honest, as I realized your game playing, which is exactly why I offered more substantial responses. Your questions required it.

    You lose.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    You are not going to convince anyone here who has really experienced blacks that honesty about blacks is racism.

    So why keep posting? You remind me of every Jewish liberal I’ve ever known. It’s just the standard propaganda instilled in liberals. It’s like kids reciting the pledge of allegiance or some standard salesman’s spiel or prayers in church.

    You memorized the propaganda long ago and can type it without even thinking. I’ve heard it all my life.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "You are awesome at not answering direct questions."

    I answered the questions posed. You are just not fond of the responses.

    "Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word."

    I will feel free to give whatever response I chose, considering the questions posed require other than simplistic answers. Just because your wife bosses you around does not mean you can take out your frustrations on this fine blog.

    "1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people?"

    Races exist. Race is biological, but it is also a human construct. It took someone to "label" it. For example, the California spotted owl is an animal. The name of the creature is a human designation—strix occidentalis. That is, binomial nomenclature refers to a formal system, developed by people, to name things, in this case a species. The California owl was not a “California owl” until someone actually and specifically attached a name to it. Likewise, races were labeled in such a fashion.

    "2. Do you believe that genetics play a role – a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada – in IQ and other behavioral traits?"

    As I stated before, genetics and environmental factors play a role in behavioral traits. It's just that there is argument as to which is more influential AND whether certain races undeniably possess particular traits generally due to those factors, like high IQ or high time preferences.

    "3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?"

    Of course traits are capable of being inherited or of passing by inheritance. Again, there has been significant controversy in the scientific community about the heritability of specific characteristics.

    "4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups – assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races?"

    There are racial and ethnic disparities say, for example, in health status that are genetically based.

    "5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live."

    It would appear environmental and cultural attributes, as well as genetic factors, are involved in long-term adaptation to high altitude.

    6. Do you believe any race is “superior” in the eyes of God?

    The human race is what most matters.

    I knew that you couldn’t do it. (My apologies for setting a trap. I really did hope that you would prove to be an honest man.)

    Farewell, Corny.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "I knew that you couldn’t do it. (My apologies for setting a trap. I really did hope that you would prove to be an honest man.)"

    Of course I am being honest, as I realized your game playing, which is exactly why I offered more substantial responses. Your questions required it.

    You lose.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Joe Franklin
    Diversity in accordance with the US constitution is 50 different state political solutions that are customized by and peculiar to the people of each state.

    In contrast, the leftist version of diversity is illicit totalitarian federal nonsense.

    Leftist have stolen state-people powers that are recognized in the US constitution 9th and 10th amendments.

    “Diversity in accordance with the US constitution is 50 different state political solutions that are customized by and peculiar to the people of each state.”

    No, diversity in accordance with the United States Constitution, by which the citizens of the 50 states have a say in such federal matters. Remember, southrons had their “state political solution”–Jim Crow. They flew too close to the sun, and got burned. Deservedly so.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You are hilarious. You're linking to papers that agree with me, except the one written in 1995, and his arguments about indirect heritability are laughable and are never seen anymore, i.e you really had to work to dig up this garbage. C'mon Corny, you can do better.

    To be clear: these findings do not mean that differences in intelligence are entirely determined by culture. Numerous researchers have found that the structure of cognitive abilities is strongly influenced by genes (although we haven't the foggiest idea which genes are reliably important).
     
    Actually, we are beginning to discover those genes.

    Researchers have long known that intelligence is highly heritable, meaning much of the difference between your IQ and someone else’s — about 40 to 80 percent, depending on your age — is explained by genetic differences.
     
    Regardless, I tire of your refusal to answer questions. You would argue that there's no such thing the color yellow because we can define yellow differently. You're a hack magician using old and tired tricks.

    Are you right or am I right? We won't answer that here or today. The future will. My bet is with history and genetics, but you have your Coke commercial so who's to say.

    “You’re linking to papers that agree with me…”

    Agree to the extent that biological and environmental factors are in play and that traits are capable of being inherited or of passing by inheritance. Otherwise, the following links I provided offered nuance.

    “except the one written in 1995, and his arguments about indirect heritability are laughable and are never seen anymore.”

    Block’s work about “indirect heritability” is visible.

    http://www.nature.com/hdy/journal/v110/n1/full/hdy201256a.html

    https://gsejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1297-9686-46-30

    http://evolutionaryecologymq.com/papers/lynch_2017_interpreting.pdf

    “You would argue that there’s no such thing the color yellow because we can define yellow differently.”

    No, I would argue that of course there is the color yellow. But there are also various shades of yellow. One has to be clear as to what shade of yellow one is discussing. It’s called context.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You are awesome at not answering direct questions. Do you get paid by the word, the number of replies, the amount of words in the replies?

    Just kidding.

    But I tire of your games. Time to see if you can be an honest man. Can you Corny? If not, let's all move on. Here are a few clear questions. Please give a one-word answer to each. (You're insufferable verbage needs to be reigned in. Simplicity is honestly after all.)


    1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people? (And if you use the "there's no such color red because there are different shades, I'm done with you forever because you're just too deceitful.)

    2. Do you believe that genetics play a role - a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada - in IQ and other behavioral traits?

    3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?

    4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups - assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races? (You would answer, No, if you don't believe genes are responsible for these traits.)

    5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live.

    6. Do you believe any race is "superior" in the eyes of God?


    Here are my answers.

    1. Yes
    2. Yes
    3. Yes
    4. Yes
    5. Yes
    6. No

    Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word.

    “You are awesome at not answering direct questions.”

    I answered the questions posed. You are just not fond of the responses.

    “Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word.”

    I will feel free to give whatever response I chose, considering the questions posed require other than simplistic answers. Just because your wife bosses you around does not mean you can take out your frustrations on this fine blog.

    “1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people?”

    Races exist. Race is biological, but it is also a human construct. It took someone to “label” it. For example, the California spotted owl is an animal. The name of the creature is a human designation—strix occidentalis. That is, binomial nomenclature refers to a formal system, developed by people, to name things, in this case a species. The California owl was not a “California owl” until someone actually and specifically attached a name to it. Likewise, races were labeled in such a fashion.

    “2. Do you believe that genetics play a role – a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada – in IQ and other behavioral traits?”

    As I stated before, genetics and environmental factors play a role in behavioral traits. It’s just that there is argument as to which is more influential AND whether certain races undeniably possess particular traits generally due to those factors, like high IQ or high time preferences.

    “3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?”

    Of course traits are capable of being inherited or of passing by inheritance. Again, there has been significant controversy in the scientific community about the heritability of specific characteristics.

    “4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups – assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races?”

    There are racial and ethnic disparities say, for example, in health status that are genetically based.

    “5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live.”

    It would appear environmental and cultural attributes, as well as genetic factors, are involved in long-term adaptation to high altitude.

    6. Do you believe any race is “superior” in the eyes of God?

    The human race is what most matters.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    I knew that you couldn't do it. (My apologies for setting a trap. I really did hope that you would prove to be an honest man.)

    Farewell, Corny.
    , @Alden
    Actually, it’s not The California Spotted Owl. They were always called spotted owls and they live all over the country.

    It was just a dispute between a Goldman Sachs subsidiary clear cutting lumber company and environmentalists wishing to preserve the redwood forests in California that made the spotted owl famous.

    You are as ignorant about owls as you are about crime and who commits most of it
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @SMK
    For nearly all black and left-liberals, Democrats and Republicans, and even mainstream, respectable conservatives, the transformation of Detroit from the "Paris of the West" to the worst large city in the U.S. had nothing to do with biology, with innate racial group differences, and everything to do with culture and politics and the magic and curse of "racism" and the "legacy of slavery and segregation." Magically, the further blacks and whites are removed from slavery and segregation, the less "racist" (whatever that now means exactly) whites and society becomes, the worse it gets in regard to charges of "racism" and "white supremacy," and now "white privilege, the more blacks hate whites for reasons that are trivial or purely imaginary, and the worse they behave, criminally and otherwise, in most respects.

    Mainstream Republicans and Fox News Conservatives blame the Democrats for Detroit, ignoring the fact that there are nice towns run by the Dems.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @MBlanc46
    That first paragraph is pure gold. Blacks used to be (mostly) productive citizens. Recognizing their cognitive limitations, we might have made a greater effort to raise their standard of living. Instead, we accepted the dogma of racial equality, automated many of the jobs that blacks used to do, and imported a mass of the Third Worlders to do even more of those jobs.

    I seem to remember Thomas Sowell writing that the Federal Government has been tracking labor force participation since 1954 and that black men, women and teenagers were more likely to be in the workface than whites and that the rates have declined since then.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    There was a Chicago Tribune article about it a few years ago. In the 1950s, blacks had a slightly higher labor force participation rate than blacks..
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wally
    Is that why black dysfunction & ignorance is greater than ever .... in spite of billions & billions of white dollars, preferences, set-asides, 'affirmative action', being thrown at it?

    You must have voted for Hillary.

    The majority of black babies are born to the dregs of black society. They set the tone of black society.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jake
    Exactly.

    Almost all black people assume that if blacks take over something that is already successful, that they will keep it that way. They pay no attention to actual failures, to black failure after black failure. It is like a magic belief for them: if they take it over, nothing will be lost.

    And if something is lost, well, obviously white racism, not black failure, caused it.

    And here is the really funny part: white Liberals hold the same childish faith in magic that blacks do. High IQ white liberals, Jews and Gentiles, have the same faith in magic that low IQ blacks have.

    In the real world: whatever city, whatever school system, whatever country, blacks take over will begin to decay into Haiti or Zimbabwe or Detroit within a few months.

    That’s true of other third world groups that have their eyes on part or all of the USA, namely Mexicans and Moslems. They are both too arrogant and stupid to realize that wherever they takeover, it’ll quickly turn into a replica of the homeland that they fled.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Issac
    "Who would have predicted all the fuss about statues of Robert E. Lee or that professional football players could occupy center stage in a public discussion over racial inequality?"

    Anyone with more than trivial exposure to black communities. Civil rights would be rolled back tomorrow if the gilded liberals who defend them were made to live within walking distance.

    Disingenuous white liberals and sanctimonious white conservatives love blacks and the further away they live, the more they love them.

    I once remarked to a Jewish friend that one of the reasons why Jews tend to be liberal is because they tend to be affluent and so can escape the consequences of their purported idealism. She agreed with me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You are awesome at not answering direct questions. Do you get paid by the word, the number of replies, the amount of words in the replies?

    Just kidding.

    But I tire of your games. Time to see if you can be an honest man. Can you Corny? If not, let's all move on. Here are a few clear questions. Please give a one-word answer to each. (You're insufferable verbage needs to be reigned in. Simplicity is honestly after all.)


    1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people? (And if you use the "there's no such color red because there are different shades, I'm done with you forever because you're just too deceitful.)

    2. Do you believe that genetics play a role - a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada - in IQ and other behavioral traits?

    3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?

    4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups - assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races? (You would answer, No, if you don't believe genes are responsible for these traits.)

    5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live.

    6. Do you believe any race is "superior" in the eyes of God?


    Here are my answers.

    1. Yes
    2. Yes
    3. Yes
    4. Yes
    5. Yes
    6. No

    Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word.

    Ha! Silly me. Meant “No” on question 4. Added one at the last minute. Screwed me up.

    Anyway, one-word answers Corny.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "Please, feel free to write all that you want. Or is that you don’t want to bite the hand that feeds you."

    Again, it's easier and comforting for you to believe Jews are around the corner and up in the rafters
    just waiting to pounce on you. So, those who question your positions are simply labeled "Jews" or there are inferences made, like the one here, about my apparent "master". When, in reality, you are a slave to your own designs.

    "Btw, since you brought up the Jews, what’s your feeling toward American Jews."

    They are like any other group in our nation. They have their voting blocs, they have their deplorables, they have their shining stars.

    "So, Actor Who Plays Corvinus, what are your thoughts on American Jews and why are wasting your time here instead of berating American Jews on their lack of we-are-the-world philosophy?"

    Assuming that Jews in their near entirety are simply scheming as globalists--of course they are hiding in plain view--hell bent on indoctrinating the unwashed masses with Cultural Marxism.

    Again, how do YOU know better than the average American white man and woman? Why are YOU immune to ignorance compared to your brethren?

    You are awesome at not answering direct questions. Do you get paid by the word, the number of replies, the amount of words in the replies?

    Just kidding.

    But I tire of your games. Time to see if you can be an honest man. Can you Corny? If not, let’s all move on. Here are a few clear questions. Please give a one-word answer to each. (You’re insufferable verbage needs to be reigned in. Simplicity is honestly after all.)

    1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people? (And if you use the “there’s no such color red because there are different shades, I’m done with you forever because you’re just too deceitful.)

    2. Do you believe that genetics play a role – a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada – in IQ and other behavioral traits?

    3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?

    4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups – assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races? (You would answer, No, if you don’t believe genes are responsible for these traits.)

    5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live.

    6. Do you believe any race is “superior” in the eyes of God?

    Here are my answers.

    1. Yes
    2. Yes
    3. Yes
    4. Yes
    5. Yes
    6. No

    Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Ha! Silly me. Meant "No" on question 4. Added one at the last minute. Screwed me up.

    Anyway, one-word answers Corny.
    , @Corvinus
    "You are awesome at not answering direct questions."

    I answered the questions posed. You are just not fond of the responses.

    "Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word."

    I will feel free to give whatever response I chose, considering the questions posed require other than simplistic answers. Just because your wife bosses you around does not mean you can take out your frustrations on this fine blog.

    "1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people?"

    Races exist. Race is biological, but it is also a human construct. It took someone to "label" it. For example, the California spotted owl is an animal. The name of the creature is a human designation—strix occidentalis. That is, binomial nomenclature refers to a formal system, developed by people, to name things, in this case a species. The California owl was not a “California owl” until someone actually and specifically attached a name to it. Likewise, races were labeled in such a fashion.

    "2. Do you believe that genetics play a role – a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada – in IQ and other behavioral traits?"

    As I stated before, genetics and environmental factors play a role in behavioral traits. It's just that there is argument as to which is more influential AND whether certain races undeniably possess particular traits generally due to those factors, like high IQ or high time preferences.

    "3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?"

    Of course traits are capable of being inherited or of passing by inheritance. Again, there has been significant controversy in the scientific community about the heritability of specific characteristics.

    "4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups – assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races?"

    There are racial and ethnic disparities say, for example, in health status that are genetically based.

    "5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live."

    It would appear environmental and cultural attributes, as well as genetic factors, are involved in long-term adaptation to high altitude.

    6. Do you believe any race is “superior” in the eyes of God?

    The human race is what most matters.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding."

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.

    Oh really? Then why are members of a certain racist-supremacist, mideast sect tgetting rich off the “civil rights movement”?

    SPLC transferring millions to offshore tax havens: Report

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/1/splc-transferred-millions-offshore-tax-havens/

    Exposing the Southern Poverty Law Center, Part III: Corrupt Connections

    http://www.resistancemedia.org/2017/05/exposing-southern-poverty-law-center.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "Prove white racism."

    Actually, it's prove racism. All groups of people have individuals who are racist. Unfortunately, the Coalition of the Right Fringe and the Coalition of the Left Fringe co-opt this term for their own designs. The normies, however, clearly understand racism exists even today despite your head in the sand approach.

    "I have a lots of evidence on my side that this underperformance is at least partially genetic."

    How one interprets that evidence is the source of that controversy.

    "The unraveling of our DNA shows that genes impact our intelligence and that genes are highly heretible. Twin studies show the same thing."

    With environment apparently playing a decided role. Chicken or egg?

    http://people.virginia.edu/~ent3c/papers2/Turkheimer%20psychological%20science.pdf

    "What proof do you have that black underachievement to whites (and whites to NE Asians) is not heavily genetic?"

    https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/the-heritability-of-intelligence-not-what-you-think

    https://medium.com/neodotlife/intelligence-genes-eb18c5ef759c

    http://bostonreview.net/science-nature-race/ned-block-race-genes-and-iq

    You are hilarious. You’re linking to papers that agree with me, except the one written in 1995, and his arguments about indirect heritability are laughable and are never seen anymore, i.e you really had to work to dig up this garbage. C’mon Corny, you can do better.

    To be clear: these findings do not mean that differences in intelligence are entirely determined by culture. Numerous researchers have found that the structure of cognitive abilities is strongly influenced by genes (although we haven’t the foggiest idea which genes are reliably important).

    Actually, we are beginning to discover those genes.

    Researchers have long known that intelligence is highly heritable, meaning much of the difference between your IQ and someone else’s — about 40 to 80 percent, depending on your age — is explained by genetic differences.

    Regardless, I tire of your refusal to answer questions. You would argue that there’s no such thing the color yellow because we can define yellow differently. You’re a hack magician using old and tired tricks.

    Are you right or am I right? We won’t answer that here or today. The future will. My bet is with history and genetics, but you have your Coke commercial so who’s to say.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "You’re linking to papers that agree with me..."

    Agree to the extent that biological and environmental factors are in play and that traits are capable of being inherited or of passing by inheritance. Otherwise, the following links I provided offered nuance.

    "except the one written in 1995, and his arguments about indirect heritability are laughable and are never seen anymore."

    Block's work about "indirect heritability" is visible.

    http://www.nature.com/hdy/journal/v110/n1/full/hdy201256a.html

    https://gsejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1297-9686-46-30

    http://evolutionaryecologymq.com/papers/lynch_2017_interpreting.pdf

    "You would argue that there’s no such thing the color yellow because we can define yellow differently."

    No, I would argue that of course there is the color yellow. But there are also various shades of yellow. One has to be clear as to what shade of yellow one is discussing. It's called context.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "The diversity scheme has always been dominated by white people, especially white queers, Jews, Zionist, and Feminist."

    Diversity is other than a scheme. It is a component of our human nature. Unless you mean how the Britons, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Frisians, Romans, Danes, and Normas were deracinated in similar fashion as they got all tangled and twisted to create the English people, that bastion of Western Civilization?

    "Your kind, the BLM and Antifa and Neocon style thugs, are violent hypocrites that endlessly demand more federal entitlements because you are smarmy, shameless criminals."

    My kind is human. BLM, Antifa, Neocon...that's not my in-group.

    "The world is a big place, and your kind is free to leave and establish a totalitarian victim cult entitlement utopia elsewhere."

    Like the Alt Right?

    Diversity in accordance with the US constitution is 50 different state political solutions that are customized by and peculiar to the people of each state.

    In contrast, the leftist version of diversity is illicit totalitarian federal nonsense.

    Leftist have stolen state-people powers that are recognized in the US constitution 9th and 10th amendments.

    Read More
    • Agree: MBlanc46
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Diversity in accordance with the US constitution is 50 different state political solutions that are customized by and peculiar to the people of each state."

    No, diversity in accordance with the United States Constitution, by which the citizens of the 50 states have a say in such federal matters. Remember, southrons had their "state political solution"--Jim Crow. They flew too close to the sun, and got burned. Deservedly so.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    Yep, you’re a B+ troll.

    “Yep, you’re a B+ troll.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Btw, since you brought up the Jews, what's your feeling toward American Jews. I would think that you'd be hanging out on the comments section of Jewish publications since we sad racist whites could only dream of their level of ethnic cohesion and organization.

    So, Actor Who Plays Corvinus, what are your thoughts on American Jews and why are wasting your time here instead of berating American Jews on their lack of we-are-the-world philosophy?

    Personally, I love them and want to emulate them. So why are you here? You should be far too busy writing your boilerplate pseudo libertarian rantings against them.

    Hmm. Seems odd. Please give me a long diatribe against the tribe since they're exactly how we'd like to be except they're already there.

    Please, feel free to write all that you want. Or is that you don't want to bite the hand that feeds you.

    “Please, feel free to write all that you want. Or is that you don’t want to bite the hand that feeds you.”

    Again, it’s easier and comforting for you to believe Jews are around the corner and up in the rafters
    just waiting to pounce on you. So, those who question your positions are simply labeled “Jews” or there are inferences made, like the one here, about my apparent “master”. When, in reality, you are a slave to your own designs.

    “Btw, since you brought up the Jews, what’s your feeling toward American Jews.”

    They are like any other group in our nation. They have their voting blocs, they have their deplorables, they have their shining stars.

    “So, Actor Who Plays Corvinus, what are your thoughts on American Jews and why are wasting your time here instead of berating American Jews on their lack of we-are-the-world philosophy?”

    Assuming that Jews in their near entirety are simply scheming as globalists–of course they are hiding in plain view–hell bent on indoctrinating the unwashed masses with Cultural Marxism.

    Again, how do YOU know better than the average American white man and woman? Why are YOU immune to ignorance compared to your brethren?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You are awesome at not answering direct questions. Do you get paid by the word, the number of replies, the amount of words in the replies?

    Just kidding.

    But I tire of your games. Time to see if you can be an honest man. Can you Corny? If not, let's all move on. Here are a few clear questions. Please give a one-word answer to each. (You're insufferable verbage needs to be reigned in. Simplicity is honestly after all.)


    1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people? (And if you use the "there's no such color red because there are different shades, I'm done with you forever because you're just too deceitful.)

    2. Do you believe that genetics play a role - a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada - in IQ and other behavioral traits?

    3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?

    4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups - assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races? (You would answer, No, if you don't believe genes are responsible for these traits.)

    5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live.

    6. Do you believe any race is "superior" in the eyes of God?


    Here are my answers.

    1. Yes
    2. Yes
    3. Yes
    4. Yes
    5. Yes
    6. No

    Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Read history, my friend.

    People like you have existed forever. They always do well in the hothouse until . . .

    “Read history, my friend.”

    More than you can even comprehend.

    “People like you have existed forever. They always do well in the hothouse until . . .”

    Until what? You and your homies with torches and pitchforks just itching for a race war? N—–, please.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The progressives are hiding the past, because history is truth, and progressivism cannot survive around truth. The word for African Americans was “Negro” until the 1970s. By banning that word, they have hidden hundreds of years of history. Wikipedia says “Negro superseded colored as the most polite word for African Americans at a time when black was considered more offensive.”

    Who now reads George Washington Carver, Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. Dubois and Booker T. Washington? For example Dubois in 1904 commented on the following claim:
    ‘“The Negro is three times as criminal as a native white, and one and a half as criminal as the foreign white, consisting in many cases of the scum of Europe.” Negro criminality is undoubtedly far greater than white, and I have little doubt that the foregoing statement is substantially, though not numerically, correct.’

    http://scua.library.umass.edu/digital/dubois/dubois9.pdf

    This disproved “disparate impact” more than a century ago.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I WAS PRESENT at the so-called “civil-rights” demonstrations of the 1960s and observed much criminal behavior that never got reported. You see, then as is now, the news media, communists and their fellow travelers had an agenda of their own and as such, could not “let a crisis go to waste”. The rapes, robberies, and the general trashing of the areas they occupied were never reported. Only the reactions of the local citizenry and law enforcement to the lawless behavior of the “demonstrators” was reported…
    These demonstrations were not peaceful by any means, the demonstrators being “egged on” by their new york-based jew “carpetbagger” handlers. The locals, both black and white, wanted NOTHING to do with these “outsiders” coming into their peaceful communities, who were there only to cause trouble. As most of the “civil-rights” handlers were new york-based leftist jews, we had a saying: “Behind every Negro, there is a jew”…
    I WAS THERE, and personally witnesses the criminal activity by these so-called “civil-rights (for some)” pioneers…
    Of course, the “mainstream media” could not afford to “let a crisis go to waste” and conveniently turned off their movie cameras and recording equipment during the numerous acts of violence by the demonstrators.
    Their agenda, then was the same as it is now…wait till the government eviscerates the first amendment (with today’s journalists approval).
    So-called “journalists” are pushing a “licensing scheme” (by the government) that would establish who a “real” journalist is…their goal is to get rid of the numerous bloggers, who, quite often, outscoop the mainstream media…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • …it will NEVER be enough for blacks…both special “civil-rights (for some)” laws and “affirmative action”, contract set-asides, scholarships for blacks only, and all other preferences based solely on race will still be around a hundred years from now. By the politicians allowing this sorry excuse for a race, this dysfunctional minority to dictate to us whites, destroying OUR history, they are prodding a “sleeping giant”. PUSHBACK IS COMING. The racial hatred that blacks have for us whites is self-destructive and will do them no good. Whatever happened to “equality of opportunity?? It has been replaced with “equality of results” (quotas) which NEVER works.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    One can but hope that pushback is coming. I’ve been looking for a counter revolution for decades. It’s nice to think about, but I doubt it will ever happen.

    The core of the problem is the unelected judiciary at every level. Getting the judiciary under control of the elected executive branch is the only way Whites can save ourselves from extermination
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Nothing will change because collectively as a society, we will never hold the afro american accountable. Holding them accountable does not mean a desire to destroy the afro, as leftist mythology proclaims. Holding afros accountable is to keep them from destroying us (economically, physically, and culturally). We as a polite society refuse to have the integrity to hold afros accountable, for fear of being politically incorrect.

    But nature/economics will be more unforgiving for allowing afros to far exceed their useful economic carrying capacity. This will eventually result in an involuntary hard economic reset back to sustainable levels, and the afros infantile understanding of economics will cause them to revolt when this occurs. We can choose to try to appease the afros, however this will not be possible indefinitely. Eventually the bill will come due at the end (and the longer we delay, the larger the bill will be).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jake
    Exactly.

    Almost all black people assume that if blacks take over something that is already successful, that they will keep it that way. They pay no attention to actual failures, to black failure after black failure. It is like a magic belief for them: if they take it over, nothing will be lost.

    And if something is lost, well, obviously white racism, not black failure, caused it.

    And here is the really funny part: white Liberals hold the same childish faith in magic that blacks do. High IQ white liberals, Jews and Gentiles, have the same faith in magic that low IQ blacks have.

    In the real world: whatever city, whatever school system, whatever country, blacks take over will begin to decay into Haiti or Zimbabwe or Detroit within a few months.

    For nearly all black and left-liberals, Democrats and Republicans, and even mainstream, respectable conservatives, the transformation of Detroit from the “Paris of the West” to the worst large city in the U.S. had nothing to do with biology, with innate racial group differences, and everything to do with culture and politics and the magic and curse of “racism” and the “legacy of slavery and segregation.” Magically, the further blacks and whites are removed from slavery and segregation, the less “racist” (whatever that now means exactly) whites and society becomes, the worse it gets in regard to charges of “racism” and “white supremacy,” and now “white privilege, the more blacks hate whites for reasons that are trivial or purely imaginary, and the worse they behave, criminally and otherwise, in most respects.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    Mainstream Republicans and Fox News Conservatives blame the Democrats for Detroit, ignoring the fact that there are nice towns run by the Dems.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Langley
    'African Americans continue to have the highest incidence, prevalence and mortality rates from chronic diseases like cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity, and issues like HIV/AIDS continue to overwhelm the Black community more so than any other racial or ethnic group.”

    The above are caused by behavior and genetics. Not Evil White Men.

    "Who would have predicted all the fuss about statues of Robert E. Lee or that professional football players could occupy center stage in a public discussion over racial inequality? Or that black actors would demand Oscars by racial quota? Moreover, the openness of American politics makes it crackpot friendly, a condition reinforced by a novelty obsessed mass media and the material rewards awaiting the next Al Sharpton."

    William Luther Pierce?

    But don’t ya know:

    “White folks was in the caves while we [blacks] was building empires … We built pyramids before Donald Trump ever knew what architecture was … we taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”
    – Al Sharpton

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Sharpton got that from a book of lies and falsehood propaganda titled “ Black Athena”. It was written by a Jew professor named Bernal at Ivy League Cornell. Every word was a lie and easily refuted

    But it became a best seller and every college prof in the land believes every word
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You’re a dying breed. I’m the future – for all races in the U.S. It’s inevitable. It’s the nature curve of history."

    No, it's the other way around. You really wish upon a star...

    https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/06/28/diversity-defines-the-millennial-generation

    Btw, since you brought up the Jews, what’s your feeling toward American Jews. I would think that you’d be hanging out on the comments section of Jewish publications since we sad racist whites could only dream of their level of ethnic cohesion and organization.

    So, Actor Who Plays Corvinus, what are your thoughts on American Jews and why are wasting your time here instead of berating American Jews on their lack of we-are-the-world philosophy?

    Personally, I love them and want to emulate them. So why are you here? You should be far too busy writing your boilerplate pseudo libertarian rantings against them.

    Hmm. Seems odd. Please give me a long diatribe against the tribe since they’re exactly how we’d like to be except they’re already there.

    Please, feel free to write all that you want. Or is that you don’t want to bite the hand that feeds you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Please, feel free to write all that you want. Or is that you don’t want to bite the hand that feeds you."

    Again, it's easier and comforting for you to believe Jews are around the corner and up in the rafters
    just waiting to pounce on you. So, those who question your positions are simply labeled "Jews" or there are inferences made, like the one here, about my apparent "master". When, in reality, you are a slave to your own designs.

    "Btw, since you brought up the Jews, what’s your feeling toward American Jews."

    They are like any other group in our nation. They have their voting blocs, they have their deplorables, they have their shining stars.

    "So, Actor Who Plays Corvinus, what are your thoughts on American Jews and why are wasting your time here instead of berating American Jews on their lack of we-are-the-world philosophy?"

    Assuming that Jews in their near entirety are simply scheming as globalists--of course they are hiding in plain view--hell bent on indoctrinating the unwashed masses with Cultural Marxism.

    Again, how do YOU know better than the average American white man and woman? Why are YOU immune to ignorance compared to your brethren?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country
    The Actor Who Plays Corvinus,

    Prove white racism.

    You're only proof is black and Hispanic underachievement. But that very likely is caused by genetic differences, just as white underperformance compared to NE Asians is partially genetic.

    I have a lots of evidence on my side that this underperformance is at least partially genetic.

    The unraveling of our DNA shows that genes impact our intelligence and that genes are highly heretible. Twin studies show the same thing.

    Genetics count and our genes are not evenly distributed, not among individuals and not among population groups, i.e. races. Kind of fits the Theory of Evolution, doesn't it.

    Every test related to IQ shows NE Asians with a higher IQ than whites. Poor Asians outscore poor whites, middle class NE Asians outscore middle class whites, etc. This nice linear performance is important. Same goes for whites and blacks.

    What proof do you have that black underachievement to whites (and whites to NE Asians) is not heavily genetic?

    Where's your counter-argument?

    You don't have one. You have semantics. You have, "Legacy of racism!" But you have no proof.

    You're the modern equivalent of a medieval monk or a Soviet apparatchik. You're "arguments" only work with the converted or the cowed. Once a Galileo speaks up, you have nothing but threats and empty rhetoric.

    I can only hope that you're a troll, an actor, because at least you wouldn't be a fool.

    “Prove white racism.”

    Actually, it’s prove racism. All groups of people have individuals who are racist. Unfortunately, the Coalition of the Right Fringe and the Coalition of the Left Fringe co-opt this term for their own designs. The normies, however, clearly understand racism exists even today despite your head in the sand approach.

    “I have a lots of evidence on my side that this underperformance is at least partially genetic.”

    How one interprets that evidence is the source of that controversy.

    “The unraveling of our DNA shows that genes impact our intelligence and that genes are highly heretible. Twin studies show the same thing.”

    With environment apparently playing a decided role. Chicken or egg?

    http://people.virginia.edu/~ent3c/papers2/Turkheimer%20psychological%20science.pdf

    “What proof do you have that black underachievement to whites (and whites to NE Asians) is not heavily genetic?”

    https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/the-heritability-of-intelligence-not-what-you-think

    https://medium.com/neodotlife/intelligence-genes-eb18c5ef759c

    http://bostonreview.net/science-nature-race/ned-block-race-genes-and-iq

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You are hilarious. You're linking to papers that agree with me, except the one written in 1995, and his arguments about indirect heritability are laughable and are never seen anymore, i.e you really had to work to dig up this garbage. C'mon Corny, you can do better.

    To be clear: these findings do not mean that differences in intelligence are entirely determined by culture. Numerous researchers have found that the structure of cognitive abilities is strongly influenced by genes (although we haven't the foggiest idea which genes are reliably important).
     
    Actually, we are beginning to discover those genes.

    Researchers have long known that intelligence is highly heritable, meaning much of the difference between your IQ and someone else’s — about 40 to 80 percent, depending on your age — is explained by genetic differences.
     
    Regardless, I tire of your refusal to answer questions. You would argue that there's no such thing the color yellow because we can define yellow differently. You're a hack magician using old and tired tricks.

    Are you right or am I right? We won't answer that here or today. The future will. My bet is with history and genetics, but you have your Coke commercial so who's to say.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You’re a dying breed. I’m the future – for all races in the U.S. It’s inevitable. It’s the nature curve of history."

    No, it's the other way around. You really wish upon a star...

    https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/06/28/diversity-defines-the-millennial-generation

    Read history, my friend.

    People like you have existed forever. They always do well in the hothouse until . . .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Read history, my friend."

    More than you can even comprehend.

    "People like you have existed forever. They always do well in the hothouse until . . ."

    Until what? You and your homies with torches and pitchforks just itching for a race war? N-----, please.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You're not a big one on facts, are you.

    Our nation is changing, no different than in past eras. There is no stopping it

     

    We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You're a dying breed. I'm the future - for all races in the U.S. It's inevitable. It's the nature curve of history.

    You are no different than the Jews
     
    You got that right.

    “We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You’re a dying breed. I’m the future – for all races in the U.S. It’s inevitable. It’s the nature curve of history.”

    No, it’s the other way around. You really wish upon a star…

    https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/06/28/diversity-defines-the-millennial-generation

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Read history, my friend.

    People like you have existed forever. They always do well in the hothouse until . . .
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Btw, since you brought up the Jews, what's your feeling toward American Jews. I would think that you'd be hanging out on the comments section of Jewish publications since we sad racist whites could only dream of their level of ethnic cohesion and organization.

    So, Actor Who Plays Corvinus, what are your thoughts on American Jews and why are wasting your time here instead of berating American Jews on their lack of we-are-the-world philosophy?

    Personally, I love them and want to emulate them. So why are you here? You should be far too busy writing your boilerplate pseudo libertarian rantings against them.

    Hmm. Seems odd. Please give me a long diatribe against the tribe since they're exactly how we'd like to be except they're already there.

    Please, feel free to write all that you want. Or is that you don't want to bite the hand that feeds you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    All I am doing is running you in circles with rhetoric. You don't know whether you are coming or going.

    Tens of millions of Americans, upper class and lower class, from black to Hispanic to white to Asian, live their lives separately. They generally interact with one another in a kind, considerate manner.
    While there is a host of political, economic, and social problems, there still remains a core sense of loyalty to our nation. The young, especially the Millennials and Generation Y, will lead the way with their moderate economic views and liberal social views. Our nation is changing, no different than in past eras. There is no stopping it :)

    "You can’t tell the rubes the truth until we’re 100% sure that they’re defeated. Slow down. We need another generation or so."

    Exactly. You want to "force feed", at best, or "jackboot", at worst, a particular ideology regardless of the consequences. You are no different than the Jews, or the elites, or the globalists.

    Again, what makes you know better than the "ignorant" masses? Is it not possible that YOU have been hoodwinked and bamboozled?

    You’re not a big one on facts, are you.

    Our nation is changing, no different than in past eras. There is no stopping it

    We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You’re a dying breed. I’m the future – for all races in the U.S. It’s inevitable. It’s the nature curve of history.

    You are no different than the Jews

    You got that right.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You’re a dying breed. I’m the future – for all races in the U.S. It’s inevitable. It’s the nature curve of history."

    No, it's the other way around. You really wish upon a star...

    https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/06/28/diversity-defines-the-millennial-generation
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Corvinus,

    As your acting coach, I have to say that you'll letting your mask slip down. Stop admitting to being a classic hate whitey SJW and get back to your pseudo libertarian, we-are-the-world Coke commercial schtick.

    It's the better play.

    You can't tell the rubes the truth until we're 100% sure that they're defeated. Slow down. We need another generation or so.

    All I am doing is running you in circles with rhetoric. You don’t know whether you are coming or going.

    Tens of millions of Americans, upper class and lower class, from black to Hispanic to white to Asian, live their lives separately. They generally interact with one another in a kind, considerate manner.
    While there is a host of political, economic, and social problems, there still remains a core sense of loyalty to our nation. The young, especially the Millennials and Generation Y, will lead the way with their moderate economic views and liberal social views. Our nation is changing, no different than in past eras. There is no stopping it :)

    “You can’t tell the rubes the truth until we’re 100% sure that they’re defeated. Slow down. We need another generation or so.”

    Exactly. You want to “force feed”, at best, or “jackboot”, at worst, a particular ideology regardless of the consequences. You are no different than the Jews, or the elites, or the globalists.

    Again, what makes you know better than the “ignorant” masses? Is it not possible that YOU have been hoodwinked and bamboozled?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You're not a big one on facts, are you.

    Our nation is changing, no different than in past eras. There is no stopping it

     

    We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You're a dying breed. I'm the future - for all races in the U.S. It's inevitable. It's the nature curve of history.

    You are no different than the Jews
     
    You got that right.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block “white racism.”

    There is no "white racism", just racism. And it's not "forced". Companies have the liberty to hire whom they want.

    "Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to “northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school."

    Chicago. New York. Boston. Wealthy whites live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school. You are not THAT dense, are you?

    "First, I was talking average differences among groups."

    Which you squarely focus on how biological differences among groups is THE factor why individuals in those groups are generally inferior.

    "Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground."

    Blacks create and maintain modern civilizations. They certainly have recently struggled in large part because of the longstanding effects of the "invade the world, invite the world" white mentality. Remember, a number of African nations only received their independence 60 years ago. They were wrecked by imperialism. Sure, Europeans built infrastructure and created schools, but their intervention created inevitable power vacuums. African nations were doing just fine building their own civilizations.

    "So, no not all people – as in a race – are equally capable. If they were, we’d have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don’t."

    Of course they are capable. They were simply bulldozed for 500 years.

    "The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren’t that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics."

    A combination of factors. Not just culture and not just genetics.

    "And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work."

    Assuming that this "Asian grind mentality" is actually a thing and assuming that blacks lack the capability to demonstrate a work ethic.

    "Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology."

    Possibly. But then again, maybe not.

    "So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism."

    It's not a "bogey man", as you clearly have demonstrated.

    The Actor Who Plays Corvinus,

    Prove white racism.

    You’re only proof is black and Hispanic underachievement. But that very likely is caused by genetic differences, just as white underperformance compared to NE Asians is partially genetic.

    I have a lots of evidence on my side that this underperformance is at least partially genetic.

    The unraveling of our DNA shows that genes impact our intelligence and that genes are highly heretible. Twin studies show the same thing.

    Genetics count and our genes are not evenly distributed, not among individuals and not among population groups, i.e. races. Kind of fits the Theory of Evolution, doesn’t it.

    Every test related to IQ shows NE Asians with a higher IQ than whites. Poor Asians outscore poor whites, middle class NE Asians outscore middle class whites, etc. This nice linear performance is important. Same goes for whites and blacks.

    What proof do you have that black underachievement to whites (and whites to NE Asians) is not heavily genetic?

    Where’s your counter-argument?

    You don’t have one. You have semantics. You have, “Legacy of racism!” But you have no proof.

    You’re the modern equivalent of a medieval monk or a Soviet apparatchik. You’re “arguments” only work with the converted or the cowed. Once a Galileo speaks up, you have nothing but threats and empty rhetoric.

    I can only hope that you’re a troll, an actor, because at least you wouldn’t be a fool.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Prove white racism."

    Actually, it's prove racism. All groups of people have individuals who are racist. Unfortunately, the Coalition of the Right Fringe and the Coalition of the Left Fringe co-opt this term for their own designs. The normies, however, clearly understand racism exists even today despite your head in the sand approach.

    "I have a lots of evidence on my side that this underperformance is at least partially genetic."

    How one interprets that evidence is the source of that controversy.

    "The unraveling of our DNA shows that genes impact our intelligence and that genes are highly heretible. Twin studies show the same thing."

    With environment apparently playing a decided role. Chicken or egg?

    http://people.virginia.edu/~ent3c/papers2/Turkheimer%20psychological%20science.pdf

    "What proof do you have that black underachievement to whites (and whites to NE Asians) is not heavily genetic?"

    https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/the-heritability-of-intelligence-not-what-you-think

    https://medium.com/neodotlife/intelligence-genes-eb18c5ef759c

    http://bostonreview.net/science-nature-race/ned-block-race-genes-and-iq
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block “white racism.”

    There is no "white racism", just racism. And it's not "forced". Companies have the liberty to hire whom they want.

    "Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to “northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school."

    Chicago. New York. Boston. Wealthy whites live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school. You are not THAT dense, are you?

    "First, I was talking average differences among groups."

    Which you squarely focus on how biological differences among groups is THE factor why individuals in those groups are generally inferior.

    "Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground."

    Blacks create and maintain modern civilizations. They certainly have recently struggled in large part because of the longstanding effects of the "invade the world, invite the world" white mentality. Remember, a number of African nations only received their independence 60 years ago. They were wrecked by imperialism. Sure, Europeans built infrastructure and created schools, but their intervention created inevitable power vacuums. African nations were doing just fine building their own civilizations.

    "So, no not all people – as in a race – are equally capable. If they were, we’d have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don’t."

    Of course they are capable. They were simply bulldozed for 500 years.

    "The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren’t that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics."

    A combination of factors. Not just culture and not just genetics.

    "And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work."

    Assuming that this "Asian grind mentality" is actually a thing and assuming that blacks lack the capability to demonstrate a work ethic.

    "Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology."

    Possibly. But then again, maybe not.

    "So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism."

    It's not a "bogey man", as you clearly have demonstrated.

    Corvinus,

    As your acting coach, I have to say that you’ll letting your mask slip down. Stop admitting to being a classic hate whitey SJW and get back to your pseudo libertarian, we-are-the-world Coke commercial schtick.

    It’s the better play.

    You can’t tell the rubes the truth until we’re 100% sure that they’re defeated. Slow down. We need another generation or so.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    All I am doing is running you in circles with rhetoric. You don't know whether you are coming or going.

    Tens of millions of Americans, upper class and lower class, from black to Hispanic to white to Asian, live their lives separately. They generally interact with one another in a kind, considerate manner.
    While there is a host of political, economic, and social problems, there still remains a core sense of loyalty to our nation. The young, especially the Millennials and Generation Y, will lead the way with their moderate economic views and liberal social views. Our nation is changing, no different than in past eras. There is no stopping it :)

    "You can’t tell the rubes the truth until we’re 100% sure that they’re defeated. Slow down. We need another generation or so."

    Exactly. You want to "force feed", at best, or "jackboot", at worst, a particular ideology regardless of the consequences. You are no different than the Jews, or the elites, or the globalists.

    Again, what makes you know better than the "ignorant" masses? Is it not possible that YOU have been hoodwinked and bamboozled?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Joe Franklin
    The diversity scheme has always been dominated by white people, especially white queers, Jews, Zionist, and Feminist.

    Unconstitutional features are still unconstitutional.

    Your kind, the BLM and Antifa and Neocon style thugs, are violent hypocrites that endlessly demand more federal entitlements because you are smarmy, shameless criminals.

    The world is a big place, and your kind is free to leave and establish a totalitarian victim cult entitlement utopia elsewhere.

    US is not a democracy, it's a constitutional republic.

    Understand it as a fact, live by it, or be gone.

    “The diversity scheme has always been dominated by white people, especially white queers, Jews, Zionist, and Feminist.”

    Diversity is other than a scheme. It is a component of our human nature. Unless you mean how the Britons, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Frisians, Romans, Danes, and Normas were deracinated in similar fashion as they got all tangled and twisted to create the English people, that bastion of Western Civilization?

    “Your kind, the BLM and Antifa and Neocon style thugs, are violent hypocrites that endlessly demand more federal entitlements because you are smarmy, shameless criminals.”

    My kind is human. BLM, Antifa, Neocon…that’s not my in-group.

    “The world is a big place, and your kind is free to leave and establish a totalitarian victim cult entitlement utopia elsewhere.”

    Like the Alt Right?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Franklin
    Diversity in accordance with the US constitution is 50 different state political solutions that are customized by and peculiar to the people of each state.

    In contrast, the leftist version of diversity is illicit totalitarian federal nonsense.

    Leftist have stolen state-people powers that are recognized in the US constitution 9th and 10th amendments.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Issac
    I'm not aware of any definition of "Liberty," that makes allowance for wealth redistribution, affirmative action, legal supremacy, and obligatory proximity. Indeed, you are defending anti-liberty as substitute for liberty that might harm your present material situation.

    “I’m not aware of any definition of “Liberty,” that makes allowance for wealth redistribution, affirmative action, legal supremacy, and obligatory proximity.”

    Of course liberty makes allowance for such things, especially when terms are made up like “obligatory proximity” without context or background. The citizens of our nation have the freedom to create or oppose policies such as wealth redistribution and affirmative action. As far as “legal supremacy”, the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.

    “Indeed, you are defending anti-liberty as substitute for liberty that might harm your present material situation.”

    You would be entirely misrepresenting the situation here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "Which groups?"

    The Alt Right.
    White nationalists.
    Neo-reactionaries.

    "Exactly what legislation?"

    Any laws deemed to be leftist or liberal in nature.

    "And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?"

    Refer to Vox Day's 14 points.

    Yep, you’re a B+ troll.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Yep, you’re a B+ troll."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqasAIyGeBU
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "Which groups?"

    The Alt Right.
    White nationalists.
    Neo-reactionaries.

    "Exactly what legislation?"

    Any laws deemed to be leftist or liberal in nature.

    "And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?"

    Refer to Vox Day's 14 points.

    I’m not aware of any definition of “Liberty,” that makes allowance for wealth redistribution, affirmative action, legal supremacy, and obligatory proximity. Indeed, you are defending anti-liberty as substitute for liberty that might harm your present material situation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "I’m not aware of any definition of “Liberty,” that makes allowance for wealth redistribution, affirmative action, legal supremacy, and obligatory proximity."

    Of course liberty makes allowance for such things, especially when terms are made up like "obligatory proximity" without context or background. The citizens of our nation have the freedom to create or oppose policies such as wealth redistribution and affirmative action. As far as "legal supremacy", the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.

    "Indeed, you are defending anti-liberty as substitute for liberty that might harm your present material situation."

    You would be entirely misrepresenting the situation here.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wally
    Is that why black dysfunction & ignorance is greater than ever .... in spite of billions & billions of white dollars, preferences, set-asides, 'affirmative action', being thrown at it?

    You must have voted for Hillary.

    “Is that why black dysfunction & ignorance is greater than ever…”

    It’s actually human dysfunction and ignorance that is greater than ever. You are proof positive of that phenomenon.

    “You must have voted for Hillary.”

    Didn’t vote for her or Trump. Both were historically weak candidates.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the “good old days”.
     
    So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block "white racism."

    A few "warts", eh. You sound like Walter Durant defending Stalin. Gotta break a few eggs to stop those white racists.

    I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

     

    We're learning. Wait until we figure out that violence works as well. Just kidding. ;)

    And, of course, northern cities are “still livable for white families”.
     
    Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to "northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school.

    You sure are a useful tool for the rich. Curious.

    All people have the capability of being successful.
     
    First, I was talking average differences among groups. You deceitfully try to make it a question about individuals. You are a very disingenuous person and debater. It's unfortunate - and utterly predictable.

    Regardless, you are simply wrong. Blacks as a group cannot be as successful at creating and maintaining a modern civilization as whites and Asians. They simply don't have enough of a smart fraction. It's unfortunate and not their fault. But it is reality.

    Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground.

    So, no not all people - as in a race - are equally capable. If they were, we'd have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don't.

    Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.
     
    When did I ever say that group differences were 100% genetic. Indeed, I mentioned several times that culture/environment is important. Probably a 50-50 split.

    Why do you lie about what I said.

    The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren't that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics.

    Why can't you acknowledge that genetics matter with average group differences and that those difference matter in outcomes? To continually deny this is embarrassing for you.

    However, there is a false perception that one culture is “better” than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

     

    Some culture are "better" at achieving certain outcomes. Doesn't make them better in a general sense but it does make them better at some things, and if those things make for a wealthier or safer society on average, than you have to accept that.

    And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work. Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology. They act on each other but changing the biology via cultural pressure takes a very, very long time.

    Is there an argument to be made that today’s laws have leaned toward “equality of outcome”? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.

     

    So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism. And the proof of that racism is the underachievement of NAMs. And since you refuse to acknowledge that the NAM underachievement is caused - at least in part - by genetic differences, you will continue to use that NAM underachievement as proof of white racism. (See Tautology.)

    This proof will allow you to enforce ever more draconian policies against whites.

    Thank you Corvinus for finally showing your true colors.

    You are anti-science and will stand behind those who unfairly punish innocent whites - and Asians.

    You are a liar who twists words to achieve a simple goal.

    “So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block “white racism.”

    There is no “white racism”, just racism. And it’s not “forced”. Companies have the liberty to hire whom they want.

    “Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to “northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school.”

    Chicago. New York. Boston. Wealthy whites live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school. You are not THAT dense, are you?

    “First, I was talking average differences among groups.”

    Which you squarely focus on how biological differences among groups is THE factor why individuals in those groups are generally inferior.

    “Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground.”

    Blacks create and maintain modern civilizations. They certainly have recently struggled in large part because of the longstanding effects of the “invade the world, invite the world” white mentality. Remember, a number of African nations only received their independence 60 years ago. They were wrecked by imperialism. Sure, Europeans built infrastructure and created schools, but their intervention created inevitable power vacuums. African nations were doing just fine building their own civilizations.

    “So, no not all people – as in a race – are equally capable. If they were, we’d have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don’t.”

    Of course they are capable. They were simply bulldozed for 500 years.

    “The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren’t that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics.”

    A combination of factors. Not just culture and not just genetics.

    “And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work.”

    Assuming that this “Asian grind mentality” is actually a thing and assuming that blacks lack the capability to demonstrate a work ethic.

    “Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology.”

    Possibly. But then again, maybe not.

    “So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism.”

    It’s not a “bogey man”, as you clearly have demonstrated.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Corvinus,

    As your acting coach, I have to say that you'll letting your mask slip down. Stop admitting to being a classic hate whitey SJW and get back to your pseudo libertarian, we-are-the-world Coke commercial schtick.

    It's the better play.

    You can't tell the rubes the truth until we're 100% sure that they're defeated. Slow down. We need another generation or so.
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    The Actor Who Plays Corvinus,

    Prove white racism.

    You're only proof is black and Hispanic underachievement. But that very likely is caused by genetic differences, just as white underperformance compared to NE Asians is partially genetic.

    I have a lots of evidence on my side that this underperformance is at least partially genetic.

    The unraveling of our DNA shows that genes impact our intelligence and that genes are highly heretible. Twin studies show the same thing.

    Genetics count and our genes are not evenly distributed, not among individuals and not among population groups, i.e. races. Kind of fits the Theory of Evolution, doesn't it.

    Every test related to IQ shows NE Asians with a higher IQ than whites. Poor Asians outscore poor whites, middle class NE Asians outscore middle class whites, etc. This nice linear performance is important. Same goes for whites and blacks.

    What proof do you have that black underachievement to whites (and whites to NE Asians) is not heavily genetic?

    Where's your counter-argument?

    You don't have one. You have semantics. You have, "Legacy of racism!" But you have no proof.

    You're the modern equivalent of a medieval monk or a Soviet apparatchik. You're "arguments" only work with the converted or the cowed. Once a Galileo speaks up, you have nothing but threats and empty rhetoric.

    I can only hope that you're a troll, an actor, because at least you wouldn't be a fool.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "Which groups?"

    The Alt Right.
    White nationalists.
    Neo-reactionaries.

    "Exactly what legislation?"

    Any laws deemed to be leftist or liberal in nature.

    "And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?"

    Refer to Vox Day's 14 points.

    Don’t forget the Cossacks! They’re always just over the mountain ready to strike. ;)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wally
    IOW, you're bluffing. There's nothing there.

    Your BS was called.

    I’m not going to do your work for you. I gave you a place where you can find all the information. If you’re too God-damned stupid to find it yourself, then that’s your problem.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    OK, I’ll play:

    “However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.”

    Which groups? Exactly what legislation? And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?

    “Which groups?”

    The Alt Right.
    White nationalists.
    Neo-reactionaries.

    “Exactly what legislation?”

    Any laws deemed to be leftist or liberal in nature.

    “And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?”

    Refer to Vox Day’s 14 points.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Don't forget the Cossacks! They're always just over the mountain ready to strike. ;)
    , @Issac
    I'm not aware of any definition of "Liberty," that makes allowance for wealth redistribution, affirmative action, legal supremacy, and obligatory proximity. Indeed, you are defending anti-liberty as substitute for liberty that might harm your present material situation.
    , @anonymous
    Yep, you’re a B+ troll.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Here you go:

    https://data.unodc.org

    Madagascar, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, the French territory of Réunion, Sierra Leone, Seychelles, Mauritius, Equatorial Guinea, Liberia, Mozambique, Sao Tome and Principe, Burundi, Rwanda (!), Somalia, Kenya, Zambia, the French territory of Mayotte, and Cameroon all have a lower murder rate than lily white Lithuania.

    Belgium has a higher murder rate than six of the above countries. Estonia, which is INCREDIBLY white, has a higher murder rate than eight of them. Latvia's murder rate is higher than a dozen.

    Hey, Anon is somewhat right. Supposedly, Central and South America (16.3 per 100,000) have a higher murder rate than Africa (12.5). (Of course, one might question the record-keeping abilities of African countries.)

    Europe comes in at 3.0, with Asia at 2.9.

    There are even a few African countries that slide in under Russia – the bad ass of the West. But I can’t imagine that anyone wanting to dissuade whites and Asians that blacks are just a great bunch of guys would want people looking at these numbers – which I highly suspect undercount blacks/African crime. (Africa is notorious for bad record-keeping as anyone who has worked there knows.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    It's all there. You seem like a smart lad. Find it yourself. I gave you everything you need to look for.

    IOW, you’re bluffing. There’s nothing there.

    Your BS was called.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    I'm not going to do your work for you. I gave you a place where you can find all the information. If you're too God-damned stupid to find it yourself, then that's your problem.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wally
    Pure bluff.

    Where? I see nothing of the kind.

    It’s all there. You seem like a smart lad. Find it yourself. I gave you everything you need to look for.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    IOW, you're bluffing. There's nothing there.

    Your BS was called.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jake
    The Civil Rights movement always featured a strong dose of shake down con artistry. More troubling, back to at least the 'Gay 90s' (1890s), white sexual adventurists with money used blacks as their excuse to advocate for sexual revolution.

    You cannot separate black civil rights from sexual revolution.

    …Muh Dyk.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jim
    Official statistics from Sub-Saharan countries are unreliable.

    A fine example of a well ordered society.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Here you go:

    https://data.unodc.org

    Madagascar, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, the French territory of Réunion, Sierra Leone, Seychelles, Mauritius, Equatorial Guinea, Liberia, Mozambique, Sao Tome and Principe, Burundi, Rwanda (!), Somalia, Kenya, Zambia, the French territory of Mayotte, and Cameroon all have a lower murder rate than lily white Lithuania.

    Belgium has a higher murder rate than six of the above countries. Estonia, which is INCREDIBLY white, has a higher murder rate than eight of them. Latvia's murder rate is higher than a dozen.

    Pure bluff.

    Where? I see nothing of the kind.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    It's all there. You seem like a smart lad. Find it yourself. I gave you everything you need to look for.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jim
    Official statistics from Sub-Saharan countries are unreliable.

    These are U.N. figures.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Let me make a provocative argument:

    The young generation of NAMs and white/Asian SJWs given what they've been taught and what every elite institution repeatedly tells them are perfectly correct in being angry at the current situation and demanding much more aggressive policies to bring NAM achievement and living standards up to those of whites.

    Let's consider what this society preaches as gospel.

    1. Blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, gays, etc., and, to a degree, white women are being held back in a variety of ways by white (mostly male) racism - both current and historic and both conscious and unconscious.

    2. This racism not only leads to lower living standards, it leads to NAM deaths in the form of increased crime levels (which are ultimately the long-term result of white racism though the actual killing is done by NAMs because of the difficult condition in which they are raised - conditions caused by white racism) and (white) police brutality. People of color are literally dying because of white racism!

    3. Despite 50+ years of government policies, affirmative action and diversity training in schools and corporations, whites (again, usually men) simply refuse to give up their racism. The proof can be seen in the continued underperformance and high crime rates of NAMs, particularly blacks. Since we know that race is a social construct and all peoples are identically capable and no more or less violent than one another, the only cause can white racism.

    4. Despite the failure of these policies, the leading politicians from both parties (usually white) and other leaders of society (academia, business, media, etc.) refuse to consider more aggressive tactics to get whites to give up their racism. The old guard is sitting on its hands while PoC die!

    5. Policies to solve white racism must become as aggressive as needed to end white racism, which is holding down millions of people of color and causing the deaths of thousands every year. Does destroying statutes compare to thousands of black deaths every year? No. Does beating a few white racists compare to thousands of black deaths every year? No. Does silencing the allies of white racists compare to thousands of black deaths every year? No.

    As you can see, once you assume that millions of NAMs are being forced to live in poverty or near poverty and thousands of blacks and Hispanics are being killed every year due to white racism, there are almost no limits on your policies to stop white racism. Confiscation of property. No problem. Beatings of whites. No problem. Killing a few whites. Regrettable, but so long as the numbers are lower than the number of blacks being killed each year, acceptable.

    If you believe what literally everyone in society has told you since birth - that white racism is causing untold pain in society - you would be justified in some pretty damn aggressive tactics to end it.

    This will not end well because no one is going to tell the truth.

    Beautifully stated, Sir.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    There are countries in Sub-Saharan Africa with lower crime rates than some countries in Europe. How many of those would be required for you to admit that you're wrong?

    Official statistics from Sub-Saharan countries are unreliable.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    These are U.N. figures.
    , @gwynedd1
    A fine example of a well ordered society.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "The so-called civil rights movement was invented to promote unconstitutional federal group rights for delusional victim culture people."

    Corrected for accuracy --> The civil rights movement bore witness to several groups of people who fought for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness because several rights found in the Constitution were perpetually violated by federal, state, and local officials.

    "Democrats and neocons love this scheme because it enables them to reliably buy the votes of the ignorant American majority."

    This "ignorant American majority" is white. Why are you denigrating your own kind? What makes YOU other than ignorant compared to your brethren?

    "Democrats and neocons are fond of this scheme so much that they’ve invented a euphemism to sell it to the ignorant public: diversity and inclusion."

    Diversity and inclusion is a feature, not a bug, of the United States since its inception.

    The diversity scheme has always been dominated by white people, especially white queers, Jews, Zionist, and Feminist.

    Unconstitutional features are still unconstitutional.

    Your kind, the BLM and Antifa and Neocon style thugs, are violent hypocrites that endlessly demand more federal entitlements because you are smarmy, shameless criminals.

    The world is a big place, and your kind is free to leave and establish a totalitarian victim cult entitlement utopia elsewhere.

    US is not a democracy, it’s a constitutional republic.

    Understand it as a fact, live by it, or be gone.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "The diversity scheme has always been dominated by white people, especially white queers, Jews, Zionist, and Feminist."

    Diversity is other than a scheme. It is a component of our human nature. Unless you mean how the Britons, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Frisians, Romans, Danes, and Normas were deracinated in similar fashion as they got all tangled and twisted to create the English people, that bastion of Western Civilization?

    "Your kind, the BLM and Antifa and Neocon style thugs, are violent hypocrites that endlessly demand more federal entitlements because you are smarmy, shameless criminals."

    My kind is human. BLM, Antifa, Neocon...that's not my in-group.

    "The world is a big place, and your kind is free to leave and establish a totalitarian victim cult entitlement utopia elsewhere."

    Like the Alt Right?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • America is having a love affair with stupidity. The only question is are they going to go all the way.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally
    Really?

    Your proof is where?

    Here you go:

    https://data.unodc.org

    Madagascar, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, the French territory of Réunion, Sierra Leone, Seychelles, Mauritius, Equatorial Guinea, Liberia, Mozambique, Sao Tome and Principe, Burundi, Rwanda (!), Somalia, Kenya, Zambia, the French territory of Mayotte, and Cameroon all have a lower murder rate than lily white Lithuania.

    Belgium has a higher murder rate than six of the above countries. Estonia, which is INCREDIBLY white, has a higher murder rate than eight of them. Latvia’s murder rate is higher than a dozen.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Pure bluff.

    Where? I see nothing of the kind.
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Hey, Anon is somewhat right. Supposedly, Central and South America (16.3 per 100,000) have a higher murder rate than Africa (12.5). (Of course, one might question the record-keeping abilities of African countries.)

    Europe comes in at 3.0, with Asia at 2.9.

    There are even a few African countries that slide in under Russia - the bad ass of the West. But I can't imagine that anyone wanting to dissuade whites and Asians that blacks are just a great bunch of guys would want people looking at these numbers - which I highly suspect undercount blacks/African crime. (Africa is notorious for bad record-keeping as anyone who has worked there knows.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That’s not allowing people to live freely. It’s the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn."

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the "good old days".

    "How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans?"

    **From the National Review, January 13, 2016….

    **Having previously accepted HUD funding through the Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) program, as well as HUD’s Community Development Block Grant program, Dubuque was formally obligated to “affirmatively further fair housing” in whatever way HUD defined that obligation.**

    Interesting. Dubuque willingly chose to take federal government funding for this particular program. Therefore, this city, fair or unfair, right or wrong, put itself in a position to abide by those rules.

    **Refusal to submit to HUD’s dictates would have led to the withdrawal of federal funding, a lawsuit for supposed discrimination, or both.**

    Lesson learned–do not accept federal funding lest one be subject to their regulations and "purposely" place blacks in white neighborhoods.

    **The cowed elected officials of Dubuque accordingly signed a “voluntary” (in truth, forced) consent agreement that effectively ceded control of the city’s housing policy to HUD for at least five years.**

    Again, the officials there completely understood that when they received federal money, they would be subject to stipulations. There was no “force” employed here. I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

    "Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There’s a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s."

    I am quite aware of northern de facto segregation. However, I am also old enough to remember when there were white families who sold their homes to non-white families, and while there were initial problems, those issues were addressed. And, of course, northern cities are "still livable for white families".

    "1) All groups are equally capable genetically".

    All people have the capability of being successful. Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.

    "2) every culture – which, of course, grows out of biology anyway – is equally good at producing achievement."

    Certainly, over the past two 200,000 years, people have developed new survival related cultural skills and technologies at a faster rate than natural selection could alter our bodies to adapt to those environmental challenges. So cultural evolution has shown to be faster than biological evolution, which has significantly modified the effect of natural selection on humans. However, there is a false perception that one culture is "better" than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

    "The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter."

    Of course the Civil Rights Movement was about equality of opportunity, considering Jim Crow laws denied opportunities for only a certain group of people. Is there an argument to be made that today's laws have leaned toward "equality of outcome"? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we "roll back" legislation to the "good old days" at the expense of liberty.

    "As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement."

    Refresh my memory as to exactly how I made this assertion and/or agree specifically with this assessment.

    "...curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one’s people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals."

    For SOME whites and non-whites, tribe and loyalty is important. You overstate the case.

    "But the Civil Rights movement doesn’t believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy."

    Assuming that there are these "genetic differences" in capability.

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the “good old days”.

    So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block “white racism.”

    A few “warts”, eh. You sound like Walter Durant defending Stalin. Gotta break a few eggs to stop those white racists.

    I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

    We’re learning. Wait until we figure out that violence works as well. Just kidding. ;)

    And, of course, northern cities are “still livable for white families”.

    Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to “northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school.

    You sure are a useful tool for the rich. Curious.

    All people have the capability of being successful.

    First, I was talking average differences among groups. You deceitfully try to make it a question about individuals. You are a very disingenuous person and debater. It’s unfortunate – and utterly predictable.

    Regardless, you are simply wrong. Blacks as a group cannot be as successful at creating and maintaining a modern civilization as whites and Asians. They simply don’t have enough of a smart fraction. It’s unfortunate and not their fault. But it is reality.

    Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground.

    So, no not all people – as in a race – are equally capable. If they were, we’d have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don’t.

    Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.

    When did I ever say that group differences were 100% genetic. Indeed, I mentioned several times that culture/environment is important. Probably a 50-50 split.

    Why do you lie about what I said.

    The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren’t that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics.

    Why can’t you acknowledge that genetics matter with average group differences and that those difference matter in outcomes? To continually deny this is embarrassing for you.

    However, there is a false perception that one culture is “better” than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

    Some culture are “better” at achieving certain outcomes. Doesn’t make them better in a general sense but it does make them better at some things, and if those things make for a wealthier or safer society on average, than you have to accept that.

    And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work. Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology. They act on each other but changing the biology via cultural pressure takes a very, very long time.

    Is there an argument to be made that today’s laws have leaned toward “equality of outcome”? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.

    So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism. And the proof of that racism is the underachievement of NAMs. And since you refuse to acknowledge that the NAM underachievement is caused – at least in part – by genetic differences, you will continue to use that NAM underachievement as proof of white racism. (See Tautology.)

    This proof will allow you to enforce ever more draconian policies against whites.

    Thank you Corvinus for finally showing your true colors.

    You are anti-science and will stand behind those who unfairly punish innocent whites – and Asians.

    You are a liar who twists words to achieve a simple goal.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block “white racism.”

    There is no "white racism", just racism. And it's not "forced". Companies have the liberty to hire whom they want.

    "Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to “northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school."

    Chicago. New York. Boston. Wealthy whites live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school. You are not THAT dense, are you?

    "First, I was talking average differences among groups."

    Which you squarely focus on how biological differences among groups is THE factor why individuals in those groups are generally inferior.

    "Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground."

    Blacks create and maintain modern civilizations. They certainly have recently struggled in large part because of the longstanding effects of the "invade the world, invite the world" white mentality. Remember, a number of African nations only received their independence 60 years ago. They were wrecked by imperialism. Sure, Europeans built infrastructure and created schools, but their intervention created inevitable power vacuums. African nations were doing just fine building their own civilizations.

    "So, no not all people – as in a race – are equally capable. If they were, we’d have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don’t."

    Of course they are capable. They were simply bulldozed for 500 years.

    "The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren’t that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics."

    A combination of factors. Not just culture and not just genetics.

    "And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work."

    Assuming that this "Asian grind mentality" is actually a thing and assuming that blacks lack the capability to demonstrate a work ethic.

    "Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology."

    Possibly. But then again, maybe not.

    "So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism."

    It's not a "bogey man", as you clearly have demonstrated.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Issac
    "Who would have predicted all the fuss about statues of Robert E. Lee or that professional football players could occupy center stage in a public discussion over racial inequality?"

    Anyone with more than trivial exposure to black communities. Civil rights would be rolled back tomorrow if the gilded liberals who defend them were made to live within walking distance.

    At least some of the gilded liberals do live within walking distance, in places such as Hyde Park, Chicago; Morningside Heights, NYC; and New Haven. They do see black behavior first hand, yet they still refuse to see it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @vx37
    Black people are simply incapable of building or maintaining an advanced modern society. Doesn't necessarily make them bad people, but it is what it is. The real core of "Civil Rights" wasn't about voting rights or school desegregation, it was about taxing whites to lift blacks above their abilities into a semblance of First World lives. Blacks living at their natural level within a First World nation was embarrassing to the elite, particularly after they began seeing themselves first and foremost as players on the imperial world stage.

    This game could have gone on for a long time but the powers that be decided to import a mass of third-worlders who, to a somewhat lesser degree than blacks, also have to be subsidized to bring them up to First World standards. As this mass grows there won't be enough money to continue the program. Too much tick and not enough dog. And as whites become a hated minority in their former homeland there's a chance that they will come to see the program as the hatred, robbery, and oppression that it always was and politically revolt against it. It's this sense of decline, of the system falling apart, of the cash cow starting to wobble, that is responsible for the shrieking hysteria among "Civil Rights" activists. They had the chance to prove themselves and they have failed. Now their political efforts are being exposed as nothing more than naked sponging that will have to be ramped up to (unsuccessfully in the long run) compete for a share of the declining pie.

    That first paragraph is pure gold. Blacks used to be (mostly) productive citizens. Recognizing their cognitive limitations, we might have made a greater effort to raise their standard of living. Instead, we accepted the dogma of racial equality, automated many of the jobs that blacks used to do, and imported a mass of the Third Worlders to do even more of those jobs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    I seem to remember Thomas Sowell writing that the Federal Government has been tracking labor force participation since 1954 and that black men, women and teenagers were more likely to be in the workface than whites and that the rates have declined since then.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    Well stated.

    But I'm afraid you'll never disturb the locked down thoughts of Corvinus, who may be an adroit troll keeping track of how many replies his/her clichéd comments attract. A much more skilled Tiny Duck.

    Yeah, I figure that’s exactly what he is. (I remember a few weeks back, he got surprisingly upset about an attack on Jewish influence. Interesting.) That’s why I usually like to call him “the actor that plays Corvinus.”

    Regardless, his comments while robotic and simple-minded need to be rebuffed occasionally for the uninformed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding."

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.

    Is that why black dysfunction & ignorance is greater than ever …. in spite of billions & billions of white dollars, preferences, set-asides, ‘affirmative action’, being thrown at it?

    You must have voted for Hillary.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Is that why black dysfunction & ignorance is greater than ever..."

    It's actually human dysfunction and ignorance that is greater than ever. You are proof positive of that phenomenon.

    "You must have voted for Hillary."

    Didn't vote for her or Trump. Both were historically weak candidates.
    , @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    The majority of black babies are born to the dregs of black society. They set the tone of black society.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That’s not allowing people to live freely. It’s the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn."

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the "good old days".

    "How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans?"

    **From the National Review, January 13, 2016….

    **Having previously accepted HUD funding through the Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) program, as well as HUD’s Community Development Block Grant program, Dubuque was formally obligated to “affirmatively further fair housing” in whatever way HUD defined that obligation.**

    Interesting. Dubuque willingly chose to take federal government funding for this particular program. Therefore, this city, fair or unfair, right or wrong, put itself in a position to abide by those rules.

    **Refusal to submit to HUD’s dictates would have led to the withdrawal of federal funding, a lawsuit for supposed discrimination, or both.**

    Lesson learned–do not accept federal funding lest one be subject to their regulations and "purposely" place blacks in white neighborhoods.

    **The cowed elected officials of Dubuque accordingly signed a “voluntary” (in truth, forced) consent agreement that effectively ceded control of the city’s housing policy to HUD for at least five years.**

    Again, the officials there completely understood that when they received federal money, they would be subject to stipulations. There was no “force” employed here. I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

    "Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There’s a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s."

    I am quite aware of northern de facto segregation. However, I am also old enough to remember when there were white families who sold their homes to non-white families, and while there were initial problems, those issues were addressed. And, of course, northern cities are "still livable for white families".

    "1) All groups are equally capable genetically".

    All people have the capability of being successful. Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.

    "2) every culture – which, of course, grows out of biology anyway – is equally good at producing achievement."

    Certainly, over the past two 200,000 years, people have developed new survival related cultural skills and technologies at a faster rate than natural selection could alter our bodies to adapt to those environmental challenges. So cultural evolution has shown to be faster than biological evolution, which has significantly modified the effect of natural selection on humans. However, there is a false perception that one culture is "better" than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

    "The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter."

    Of course the Civil Rights Movement was about equality of opportunity, considering Jim Crow laws denied opportunities for only a certain group of people. Is there an argument to be made that today's laws have leaned toward "equality of outcome"? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we "roll back" legislation to the "good old days" at the expense of liberty.

    "As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement."

    Refresh my memory as to exactly how I made this assertion and/or agree specifically with this assessment.

    "...curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one’s people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals."

    For SOME whites and non-whites, tribe and loyalty is important. You overstate the case.

    "But the Civil Rights movement doesn’t believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy."

    Assuming that there are these "genetic differences" in capability.

    OK, I’ll play:

    “However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.”

    Which groups? Exactly what legislation? And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Which groups?"

    The Alt Right.
    White nationalists.
    Neo-reactionaries.

    "Exactly what legislation?"

    Any laws deemed to be leftist or liberal in nature.

    "And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?"

    Refer to Vox Day's 14 points.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    There are countries in Sub-Saharan Africa with lower crime rates than some countries in Europe. How many of those would be required for you to admit that you're wrong?

    Really?

    Your proof is where?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Here you go:

    https://data.unodc.org

    Madagascar, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, the French territory of Réunion, Sierra Leone, Seychelles, Mauritius, Equatorial Guinea, Liberia, Mozambique, Sao Tome and Principe, Burundi, Rwanda (!), Somalia, Kenya, Zambia, the French territory of Mayotte, and Cameroon all have a lower murder rate than lily white Lithuania.

    Belgium has a higher murder rate than six of the above countries. Estonia, which is INCREDIBLY white, has a higher murder rate than eight of them. Latvia's murder rate is higher than a dozen.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Robert Weissberg
    Absolutely correct. Third world folk cannot understand the concept of the golden goose. They think that their loots is forever. The eternal EBT card.

    Exactly.

    Almost all black people assume that if blacks take over something that is already successful, that they will keep it that way. They pay no attention to actual failures, to black failure after black failure. It is like a magic belief for them: if they take it over, nothing will be lost.

    And if something is lost, well, obviously white racism, not black failure, caused it.

    And here is the really funny part: white Liberals hold the same childish faith in magic that blacks do. High IQ white liberals, Jews and Gentiles, have the same faith in magic that low IQ blacks have.

    In the real world: whatever city, whatever school system, whatever country, blacks take over will begin to decay into Haiti or Zimbabwe or Detroit within a few months.

    Read More
    • Agree: SMK
    • Replies: @SMK
    For nearly all black and left-liberals, Democrats and Republicans, and even mainstream, respectable conservatives, the transformation of Detroit from the "Paris of the West" to the worst large city in the U.S. had nothing to do with biology, with innate racial group differences, and everything to do with culture and politics and the magic and curse of "racism" and the "legacy of slavery and segregation." Magically, the further blacks and whites are removed from slavery and segregation, the less "racist" (whatever that now means exactly) whites and society becomes, the worse it gets in regard to charges of "racism" and "white supremacy," and now "white privilege, the more blacks hate whites for reasons that are trivial or purely imaginary, and the worse they behave, criminally and otherwise, in most respects.
    , @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    That's true of other third world groups that have their eyes on part or all of the USA, namely Mexicans and Moslems. They are both too arrogant and stupid to realize that wherever they takeover, it'll quickly turn into a replica of the homeland that they fled.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @vx37
    Black people are simply incapable of building or maintaining an advanced modern society. Doesn't necessarily make them bad people, but it is what it is. The real core of "Civil Rights" wasn't about voting rights or school desegregation, it was about taxing whites to lift blacks above their abilities into a semblance of First World lives. Blacks living at their natural level within a First World nation was embarrassing to the elite, particularly after they began seeing themselves first and foremost as players on the imperial world stage.

    This game could have gone on for a long time but the powers that be decided to import a mass of third-worlders who, to a somewhat lesser degree than blacks, also have to be subsidized to bring them up to First World standards. As this mass grows there won't be enough money to continue the program. Too much tick and not enough dog. And as whites become a hated minority in their former homeland there's a chance that they will come to see the program as the hatred, robbery, and oppression that it always was and politically revolt against it. It's this sense of decline, of the system falling apart, of the cash cow starting to wobble, that is responsible for the shrieking hysteria among "Civil Rights" activists. They had the chance to prove themselves and they have failed. Now their political efforts are being exposed as nothing more than naked sponging that will have to be ramped up to (unsuccessfully in the long run) compete for a share of the declining pie.

    Absolutely correct. Third world folk cannot understand the concept of the golden goose. They think that their loots is forever. The eternal EBT card.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    Exactly.

    Almost all black people assume that if blacks take over something that is already successful, that they will keep it that way. They pay no attention to actual failures, to black failure after black failure. It is like a magic belief for them: if they take it over, nothing will be lost.

    And if something is lost, well, obviously white racism, not black failure, caused it.

    And here is the really funny part: white Liberals hold the same childish faith in magic that blacks do. High IQ white liberals, Jews and Gentiles, have the same faith in magic that low IQ blacks have.

    In the real world: whatever city, whatever school system, whatever country, blacks take over will begin to decay into Haiti or Zimbabwe or Detroit within a few months.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country
    So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That's not allowing people to live freely. It's the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn.

    How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans? Again, not exactly your libertarian, we-are-the-world Coke commercial philosophy.

    Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There's a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s.

    Finally, even assuming that it's not just a racial shake-down (a laughable assumption), the "Civil Rights" movement of today is based on two incorrect assumptions: 1) All groups are equally capable genetically and 2) every culture - which, of course, grows out of biology anyway - is equally good at producing achievement. As a result, all civil rights policies are based on disparate impact, i.e. any differences in group achievements are prima facie evidence of racism.

    The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter.

    As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement. You argue that this is fine, "Let everyone live where they want and be friends with whom they want" is your manta, curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one's people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals.

    But the Civil Rights movement doesn't believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy.

    If you don't understand this, you are a fool. If you do, you are a liar. Which is it?

    “So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That’s not allowing people to live freely. It’s the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn.”

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the “good old days”.

    “How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans?”

    **From the National Review, January 13, 2016….

    **Having previously accepted HUD funding through the Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) program, as well as HUD’s Community Development Block Grant program, Dubuque was formally obligated to “affirmatively further fair housing” in whatever way HUD defined that obligation.**

    Interesting. Dubuque willingly chose to take federal government funding for this particular program. Therefore, this city, fair or unfair, right or wrong, put itself in a position to abide by those rules.

    **Refusal to submit to HUD’s dictates would have led to the withdrawal of federal funding, a lawsuit for supposed discrimination, or both.**

    Lesson learned–do not accept federal funding lest one be subject to their regulations and “purposely” place blacks in white neighborhoods.

    **The cowed elected officials of Dubuque accordingly signed a “voluntary” (in truth, forced) consent agreement that effectively ceded control of the city’s housing policy to HUD for at least five years.**

    Again, the officials there completely understood that when they received federal money, they would be subject to stipulations. There was no “force” employed here. I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

    “Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There’s a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s.”

    I am quite aware of northern de facto segregation. However, I am also old enough to remember when there were white families who sold their homes to non-white families, and while there were initial problems, those issues were addressed. And, of course, northern cities are “still livable for white families”.

    “1) All groups are equally capable genetically”.

    All people have the capability of being successful. Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.

    “2) every culture – which, of course, grows out of biology anyway – is equally good at producing achievement.”

    Certainly, over the past two 200,000 years, people have developed new survival related cultural skills and technologies at a faster rate than natural selection could alter our bodies to adapt to those environmental challenges. So cultural evolution has shown to be faster than biological evolution, which has significantly modified the effect of natural selection on humans. However, there is a false perception that one culture is “better” than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

    “The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter.”

    Of course the Civil Rights Movement was about equality of opportunity, considering Jim Crow laws denied opportunities for only a certain group of people. Is there an argument to be made that today’s laws have leaned toward “equality of outcome”? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.

    “As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement.”

    Refresh my memory as to exactly how I made this assertion and/or agree specifically with this assessment.

    “…curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one’s people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals.”

    For SOME whites and non-whites, tribe and loyalty is important. You overstate the case.

    “But the Civil Rights movement doesn’t believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy.”

    Assuming that there are these “genetic differences” in capability.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    OK, I’ll play:

    “However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.”

    Which groups? Exactly what legislation? And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?

    , @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the “good old days”.
     
    So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block "white racism."

    A few "warts", eh. You sound like Walter Durant defending Stalin. Gotta break a few eggs to stop those white racists.

    I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

     

    We're learning. Wait until we figure out that violence works as well. Just kidding. ;)

    And, of course, northern cities are “still livable for white families”.
     
    Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to "northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school.

    You sure are a useful tool for the rich. Curious.

    All people have the capability of being successful.
     
    First, I was talking average differences among groups. You deceitfully try to make it a question about individuals. You are a very disingenuous person and debater. It's unfortunate - and utterly predictable.

    Regardless, you are simply wrong. Blacks as a group cannot be as successful at creating and maintaining a modern civilization as whites and Asians. They simply don't have enough of a smart fraction. It's unfortunate and not their fault. But it is reality.

    Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground.

    So, no not all people - as in a race - are equally capable. If they were, we'd have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don't.

    Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.
     
    When did I ever say that group differences were 100% genetic. Indeed, I mentioned several times that culture/environment is important. Probably a 50-50 split.

    Why do you lie about what I said.

    The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren't that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics.

    Why can't you acknowledge that genetics matter with average group differences and that those difference matter in outcomes? To continually deny this is embarrassing for you.

    However, there is a false perception that one culture is “better” than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

     

    Some culture are "better" at achieving certain outcomes. Doesn't make them better in a general sense but it does make them better at some things, and if those things make for a wealthier or safer society on average, than you have to accept that.

    And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work. Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology. They act on each other but changing the biology via cultural pressure takes a very, very long time.

    Is there an argument to be made that today’s laws have leaned toward “equality of outcome”? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.

     

    So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism. And the proof of that racism is the underachievement of NAMs. And since you refuse to acknowledge that the NAM underachievement is caused - at least in part - by genetic differences, you will continue to use that NAM underachievement as proof of white racism. (See Tautology.)

    This proof will allow you to enforce ever more draconian policies against whites.

    Thank you Corvinus for finally showing your true colors.

    You are anti-science and will stand behind those who unfairly punish innocent whites - and Asians.

    You are a liar who twists words to achieve a simple goal.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wally
    In EVERY instance where blacks are in great numbers, control the governments of cities, counties, regions, states, countries, & continents we ALWAYS see:
    massive murder rates
    massive crime in general
    degraded property
    massive disease, especially STDs
    massive drug abuse
    general filth, squalor
    massive, unable to support their own children, birthrates
    massive youth pregnancies rates
    massive school dropout rates
    incredibly low IQs & test scores
    violence as a way of life
    fathers nowhere to be found

    There are countries in Sub-Saharan Africa with lower crime rates than some countries in Europe. How many of those would be required for you to admit that you’re wrong?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Really?

    Your proof is where?
    , @Jim
    Official statistics from Sub-Saharan countries are unreliable.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "The so-called civil rights movement was invented to promote unconstitutional federal group rights for delusional victim culture people."

    Corrected for accuracy --> The civil rights movement bore witness to several groups of people who fought for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness because several rights found in the Constitution were perpetually violated by federal, state, and local officials.

    "Democrats and neocons love this scheme because it enables them to reliably buy the votes of the ignorant American majority."

    This "ignorant American majority" is white. Why are you denigrating your own kind? What makes YOU other than ignorant compared to your brethren?

    "Democrats and neocons are fond of this scheme so much that they’ve invented a euphemism to sell it to the ignorant public: diversity and inclusion."

    Diversity and inclusion is a feature, not a bug, of the United States since its inception.

    See #22.

    This is a game for you, isn’t it? And do replies like mine count?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Joe Franklin
    The so-called civil rights movement was invented to promote unconstitutional federal group rights for delusional victim culture people.

    Democrats and neocons love this scheme because it enables them to reliably buy the votes of the ignorant American majority.

    Democrats and neocons are fond of this scheme so much that they've invented a euphemism to sell it to the ignorant public: diversity and inclusion.

    .................................................................................................................................................................

    Feminist are entitled by law because of assumed Male oppression
    Jewish are entitled by law because of assumed Gentile oppression
    Sodomites are entitled by law because of assumed Straight oppression
    Elective Abortionist are entitled by law because of assumed Innocent Life Advocate oppression
    Muslims are entitled by law because of assumed Christian oppression
    Disabled are entitled by law because of assumed Healthy oppression
    Afro-blacks are entitled by law because of assumed White oppression
    Latinos are entitled by law because of assumed Gringo oppression
    Hispanics are entitled by law because of assumed Gringo oppression
    Military Veterans are entitled by law because of assumed Militia oppression
    Native Americans are entitled by law because of assumed Paleface oppression
    Asians are entitled by law because of assumed Occidental oppression
    International Socialist are entitled by law because of assumed Local Government oppression
    Social Justice Crony Capitalist are entitled by law because of assumed Honest Businessmen oppression
    Zionist-Neocons are entitled by law because of assumed Anti-Fascist oppression

    “The so-called civil rights movement was invented to promote unconstitutional federal group rights for delusional victim culture people.”

    Corrected for accuracy –> The civil rights movement bore witness to several groups of people who fought for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness because several rights found in the Constitution were perpetually violated by federal, state, and local officials.

    “Democrats and neocons love this scheme because it enables them to reliably buy the votes of the ignorant American majority.”

    This “ignorant American majority” is white. Why are you denigrating your own kind? What makes YOU other than ignorant compared to your brethren?

    “Democrats and neocons are fond of this scheme so much that they’ve invented a euphemism to sell it to the ignorant public: diversity and inclusion.”

    Diversity and inclusion is a feature, not a bug, of the United States since its inception.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    See #22.

    This is a game for you, isn't it? And do replies like mine count?
    , @Joe Franklin
    The diversity scheme has always been dominated by white people, especially white queers, Jews, Zionist, and Feminist.

    Unconstitutional features are still unconstitutional.

    Your kind, the BLM and Antifa and Neocon style thugs, are violent hypocrites that endlessly demand more federal entitlements because you are smarmy, shameless criminals.

    The world is a big place, and your kind is free to leave and establish a totalitarian victim cult entitlement utopia elsewhere.

    US is not a democracy, it's a constitutional republic.

    Understand it as a fact, live by it, or be gone.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Langley
    Stop hating on Southerners.

    You Yankees were the same.

    http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.com/2017/07/segregation-our-most-cherished-myths.html

    On a previous thread on unz.com, I made people aware of one “Yankee Imperialist” who made several important counterpoints. I would advise that you take his/her perspective seriously.

    “Stop hating on Southerners.”

    There is an observable difference between southrons and Southerners, Yankees and northerners.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The Civil Rights movement always featured a strong dose of shake down con artistry. More troubling, back to at least the ‘Gay 90s’ (1890s), white sexual adventurists with money used blacks as their excuse to advocate for sexual revolution.

    You cannot separate black civil rights from sexual revolution.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    ...Muh Dyk.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country
    So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That's not allowing people to live freely. It's the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn.

    How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans? Again, not exactly your libertarian, we-are-the-world Coke commercial philosophy.

    Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There's a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s.

    Finally, even assuming that it's not just a racial shake-down (a laughable assumption), the "Civil Rights" movement of today is based on two incorrect assumptions: 1) All groups are equally capable genetically and 2) every culture - which, of course, grows out of biology anyway - is equally good at producing achievement. As a result, all civil rights policies are based on disparate impact, i.e. any differences in group achievements are prima facie evidence of racism.

    The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter.

    As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement. You argue that this is fine, "Let everyone live where they want and be friends with whom they want" is your manta, curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one's people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals.

    But the Civil Rights movement doesn't believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy.

    If you don't understand this, you are a fool. If you do, you are a liar. Which is it?

    Well stated.

    But I’m afraid you’ll never disturb the locked down thoughts of Corvinus, who may be an adroit troll keeping track of how many replies his/her clichéd comments attract. A much more skilled Tiny Duck.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Yeah, I figure that's exactly what he is. (I remember a few weeks back, he got surprisingly upset about an attack on Jewish influence. Interesting.) That's why I usually like to call him "the actor that plays Corvinus."

    Regardless, his comments while robotic and simple-minded need to be rebuffed occasionally for the uninformed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • (Yawn…) Another article by a slave who’s paid to spy on the other slaves. What else is new?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding."

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.

    So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That’s not allowing people to live freely. It’s the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn.

    How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans? Again, not exactly your libertarian, we-are-the-world Coke commercial philosophy.

    Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There’s a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s.

    Finally, even assuming that it’s not just a racial shake-down (a laughable assumption), the “Civil Rights” movement of today is based on two incorrect assumptions: 1) All groups are equally capable genetically and 2) every culture – which, of course, grows out of biology anyway – is equally good at producing achievement. As a result, all civil rights policies are based on disparate impact, i.e. any differences in group achievements are prima facie evidence of racism.

    The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter.

    As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement. You argue that this is fine, “Let everyone live where they want and be friends with whom they want” is your manta, curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one’s people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals.

    But the Civil Rights movement doesn’t believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy.

    If you don’t understand this, you are a fool. If you do, you are a liar. Which is it?

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    Well stated.

    But I'm afraid you'll never disturb the locked down thoughts of Corvinus, who may be an adroit troll keeping track of how many replies his/her clichéd comments attract. A much more skilled Tiny Duck.

    , @Corvinus
    "So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That’s not allowing people to live freely. It’s the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn."

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the "good old days".

    "How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans?"

    **From the National Review, January 13, 2016….

    **Having previously accepted HUD funding through the Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) program, as well as HUD’s Community Development Block Grant program, Dubuque was formally obligated to “affirmatively further fair housing” in whatever way HUD defined that obligation.**

    Interesting. Dubuque willingly chose to take federal government funding for this particular program. Therefore, this city, fair or unfair, right or wrong, put itself in a position to abide by those rules.

    **Refusal to submit to HUD’s dictates would have led to the withdrawal of federal funding, a lawsuit for supposed discrimination, or both.**

    Lesson learned–do not accept federal funding lest one be subject to their regulations and "purposely" place blacks in white neighborhoods.

    **The cowed elected officials of Dubuque accordingly signed a “voluntary” (in truth, forced) consent agreement that effectively ceded control of the city’s housing policy to HUD for at least five years.**

    Again, the officials there completely understood that when they received federal money, they would be subject to stipulations. There was no “force” employed here. I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

    "Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There’s a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s."

    I am quite aware of northern de facto segregation. However, I am also old enough to remember when there were white families who sold their homes to non-white families, and while there were initial problems, those issues were addressed. And, of course, northern cities are "still livable for white families".

    "1) All groups are equally capable genetically".

    All people have the capability of being successful. Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.

    "2) every culture – which, of course, grows out of biology anyway – is equally good at producing achievement."

    Certainly, over the past two 200,000 years, people have developed new survival related cultural skills and technologies at a faster rate than natural selection could alter our bodies to adapt to those environmental challenges. So cultural evolution has shown to be faster than biological evolution, which has significantly modified the effect of natural selection on humans. However, there is a false perception that one culture is "better" than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

    "The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter."

    Of course the Civil Rights Movement was about equality of opportunity, considering Jim Crow laws denied opportunities for only a certain group of people. Is there an argument to be made that today's laws have leaned toward "equality of outcome"? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we "roll back" legislation to the "good old days" at the expense of liberty.

    "As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement."

    Refresh my memory as to exactly how I made this assertion and/or agree specifically with this assessment.

    "...curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one’s people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals."

    For SOME whites and non-whites, tribe and loyalty is important. You overstate the case.

    "But the Civil Rights movement doesn’t believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy."

    Assuming that there are these "genetic differences" in capability.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.