The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / On "American History"
 All Comments / On "American History"
    There has been lots of comment on Mormons and politics recently. I think the key aspect which is underemphasized in these pieces are the deep differences within Anglo-American cultural streams (as opposed to the short-term reasons for Mormon disaffection from the conservative coalition, such as their internationalism). If you haven't read Albion's Seed, you should....
  • @Twinkie

    From my reading of history the Pope’s role and relationship to the rest of the clerical community (and public at large) has been an evolving one, correct? For instance, the Pope prior to the Peace of Westphalia, etc.
     
    Given that popes used to have an army and would war with other secular rulers, yes. But the phenomenon of Apostolic succession remains the same, and constitutes the basis of papal authority.

    the need of an ecumenical council/conference on the scale of Vatican II that would likely be required
     
    Even that is not enough. Not everything that comes out of an ecumenical council is canonical. Truths are immutable. Ecumenical councils (and popes) are only infallible on matters of faith and morals. Nothing else. And ex cathedra pronouncements are very rare.

    I don't want to get into this too much (it's a well-trodden subject among Catholics), but let's just say that (some) people tend to overplay the changes that Vatican II brought, which have been largely aesthetic. Many of such stylistic changes are displeasing to me, but they did not change Dogma. So even when I am on the road and must bring myself to a bongo-playing parish, the Sacrements remain valid. For that matter, Orthodox Sacraments are valid for me too (though the Orthodox priest in question would be most disturbed if he found out I was a Catholic - it's not a stunt I would pull except in a dire circumstance).

    I’m a lapsed Catholic myself, but my understanding is that the actual documents from the Council are quite orthodox. It was the “spirit of Vatican II” (or the interpretation there of) that led to the various liberalizations. Remember, as a bishop and cardinal, John Paul II was an supporter of the Council and as pope referred to it often. He just didn’t interpret it the way liberals did.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Uncle Remus
    Gore's snotty personality helped him lose in 2000. He learned this by living in D.C. as the son of a senator and attending a prestigious prep school. Snotty preppy attitudes are not the result of "patrician" ancestry, most certainly in this case.

    Snotty personalities afflict all classes.

    Fact: If Gore had gotten more of the yahoo vote in the Florida Panhandle he would have been elected President.

    Fact: The reason that he didn’t get enough yahoo votes was because of his patrician-like persona, whether real or learned.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @yaqub the mad scientist
    I don't think anybody's arguing your point about his more "worldly" airs making him lose popularity. The point is that he lived in an area that was not as hospitable to a patrician/educated elite as in, say, west Tennessee, or the outlier of Chattanooga, which has a mix of upland and lowland South characteristics with a history of cultured outsiders moving in. As the years went by, he probably just didn't want to keep up with populist appearances-as in the well-known country fiddler persona of his youth.

    An example of how people with a more patrician sensibility were historically electable would be Mississippi, specifically the Delta region. Historically, it has tended to elect educated, relatively cultured people to local and national offices (think of novelist Walker Percy's family)- and that rubbed off on neighboring parts of the state to the point that Haley Barbour quipped about how populist men-in-overalls types generally don't get elected to offices beyond the county level. People like their fratboys-in-a-suit type. Even now, a few of those towns have Chinese and Jewish mayors.

    Gore’s snotty personality helped him lose in 2000. He learned this by living in D.C. as the son of a senator and attending a prestigious prep school. Snotty preppy attitudes are not the result of “patrician” ancestry, most certainly in this case.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Snotty personalities afflict all classes.

    Fact: If Gore had gotten more of the yahoo vote in the Florida Panhandle he would have been elected President.

    Fact: The reason that he didn't get enough yahoo votes was because of his patrician-like persona, whether real or learned.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Eastern
    Sorry to comment so lately, but I've independently thought of this same stuff. As someone living in the rural South, I was always perplexed as to why the conduct of most self-identifying Southern Baptist members diverged so greatly from the conservative preachings of the clergy. I had the feeling living in the rural South that so many of the people just seemed to lack structure and discipline. And this was even more of a puzzle given that other groups like Mormons, Orthodox Jews, and the Amish seemed to have lifestyles where the behavior of members aligned with the conservative holdings of the faith (I know this is oversimplifying matters). When I read the summary of Albion's Seed on Slate Star Codex, that provided a basis framework that made everything make a whole lot more sense. It also explains why Trump seems to elicit so much reflexive support from the rural South (even among the religiously devout who would have slammed Clinton and entertainers for similar statements and actions made over the years) but instant disgust from the Mormon community.

    I was always perplexed as to why the conduct of most self-identifying Southern Baptist members diverged so greatly from the conservative preachings of the clergy.

    I don’t know if they still have the practice, but in the 1st half of the 20th century, Free Will Baptists were very strict in regards to the behavior of members. Committees were formed to investigate misbehavior of members and if found guilty, “fellowship” would be withdrawn and the member banished from the congregation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Clark
    Razib, I think it got mentioned in your original post, but the one problem with your theory is that most of the English in Utah came during a huge wave of immigration in the second half of the 19th century from Mormon missionary efforts there. There was also a relatively large wave of immigration of Scandinavians. (There's actually one town primarily settled by Icelanders) Even before the move to Utah a large percentage of Mormons were European. This tends to undercut somewhat the puritan thesis even though many of the leaders of Mormonism do come out of the New England culture. In particular Brigham Young is very much the ideal of a pragmatic yankee. While early Mormonism definitely had a lot of early Yankee converts many if not most of these didn't stay with the movement.

    The thesis about Puritanism might have certain elements, but if they are there I think they're a bit more indirect. Early Mormonism is much more driven by converts from the more Arminian tradition rather than the Calvinist tradition. (A large conversion of Cambellites who largely followed Wesley's type of Arminianism set the tone for early Mormonism prior to the move to Illinois)

    Mormonism always had an uncomfortable relationship with the south. When they moved to Missouri they were persecuted largely due to being seen as abolitionists. (This was just a few years after a major slave rebellion) Mormon missionaries were often extremely persecuted in the south and sometimes lynched. There was a perception that southerners were in part behind the murder of Joseph Smith as well. This eventually led, during the Utah War period, to the Mountain Meadows Massacre. (The settlers heading to California were from Arkansas and just a few months earlier a Mormon apostle had been murdered in Arkansas) While in the Utah period, partially due to immigrants from the south, the tended to have a position not nearly as abolitionist as before those elements did remain in some ways. (I suspect part of this was due to Republican opposition to Mormons as well - there were political calls of eliminating the twin relics of barbarism of slavery and Mormonism)

    What you describe is a legitimate ethnogenesis.

    The Mormon Ethnogensis.

    Where does an “ethnicity” come from? They don’t just descend from heaven, fully formed, right? So they are born. How are they born; how do they emerge? The Mormon case is actually a great example, albeit unique in certain ways. It is most useful to see the Mormons as a new ethnicity, drawing in part from previous ones (where else does one draw from?), but really its own thing.

    Ethnicity, of course, is and remains tied in tightly with religion, and probably always has been.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @German_reader
    Seems to be the case in Mitt Romney's family too, his great-great-grandfather was from Preston in Lancashire:
    http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-18422949

    Seems to be the case in Mitt Romney’s family too, his great-great-grandfather was from Preston in Lancashire:

    I’d like to direct people here to what I believe to be the fullest and most comprehensive account of Mitt Romney’s ancestry, back four and more generations (compiled and written by me in 2012). Respectfully submitted for your consideration:

    Synopsis off Mitt Romney’s Ancestry

    (1) Most of Mitt Romney’s ancestral stock consists of early converts to Mormonism from Britain (most from Northwest-England and Scotland) who were impelled to the USA from the 1830s to the 1850s, settling directly in Mormon communities.

    (2) Colonial-Yankees account for 27% of Romney’s ancestral stock.

    (3) 12.5% (one-eighth) of his ancestral stock comes from Northern-Germany.

    (4) Many of Romney’s ancestors who were then-living participated in the dramatic 1846-7 Mormon Exodus from Illinois to Utah.

    (5) All of Romney’s ancestral lines end up in Utah by the 1880s.

    (6) Some went to Mexico at the end of the 1800s, but were expelled in 1912 and went back to Utah.

    — — —

    Mitt Romney: Ethnic Ancestry Summary
    40.6% England — Mostly Northwest England, partly W.Midlands.
    18.8% Scotland
    26.6% Colonial-Yankee
    12.5% North-German
    1.5-3% French, Acadian, possible Huguenot (see entries #5 and #7 below)
    __________________

    (The full accounts of each of Mitt Romney’s eight ancestral lines)

    We see much more British ancestry (converts to Mormonism in Britain who emigrated to join the Elect), including Scottish, than actual Colonial Yankee ancestry… The disproportionately-important patrlineal line itself is also very firmly English, out of Northumberland, NW England.

    Mitt Romney is one man, but I believe his “ancestral portrait” is representative; his overall ancestral portrait does not quite support the theory seemingly here proposed that Mormonism is a direct descendant (ethnically as well as culturally) of Yankeeism.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Sorry to comment so lately, but I’ve independently thought of this same stuff. As someone living in the rural South, I was always perplexed as to why the conduct of most self-identifying Southern Baptist members diverged so greatly from the conservative preachings of the clergy. I had the feeling living in the rural South that so many of the people just seemed to lack structure and discipline. And this was even more of a puzzle given that other groups like Mormons, Orthodox Jews, and the Amish seemed to have lifestyles where the behavior of members aligned with the conservative holdings of the faith (I know this is oversimplifying matters). When I read the summary of Albion’s Seed on Slate Star Codex, that provided a basis framework that made everything make a whole lot more sense. It also explains why Trump seems to elicit so much reflexive support from the rural South (even among the religiously devout who would have slammed Clinton and entertainers for similar statements and actions made over the years) but instant disgust from the Mormon community.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    I was always perplexed as to why the conduct of most self-identifying Southern Baptist members diverged so greatly from the conservative preachings of the clergy.

    I don't know if they still have the practice, but in the 1st half of the 20th century, Free Will Baptists were very strict in regards to the behavior of members. Committees were formed to investigate misbehavior of members and if found guilty, "fellowship" would be withdrawn and the member banished from the congregation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Clark
    Razib, I think it got mentioned in your original post, but the one problem with your theory is that most of the English in Utah came during a huge wave of immigration in the second half of the 19th century from Mormon missionary efforts there. There was also a relatively large wave of immigration of Scandinavians. (There's actually one town primarily settled by Icelanders) Even before the move to Utah a large percentage of Mormons were European. This tends to undercut somewhat the puritan thesis even though many of the leaders of Mormonism do come out of the New England culture. In particular Brigham Young is very much the ideal of a pragmatic yankee. While early Mormonism definitely had a lot of early Yankee converts many if not most of these didn't stay with the movement.

    The thesis about Puritanism might have certain elements, but if they are there I think they're a bit more indirect. Early Mormonism is much more driven by converts from the more Arminian tradition rather than the Calvinist tradition. (A large conversion of Cambellites who largely followed Wesley's type of Arminianism set the tone for early Mormonism prior to the move to Illinois)

    Mormonism always had an uncomfortable relationship with the south. When they moved to Missouri they were persecuted largely due to being seen as abolitionists. (This was just a few years after a major slave rebellion) Mormon missionaries were often extremely persecuted in the south and sometimes lynched. There was a perception that southerners were in part behind the murder of Joseph Smith as well. This eventually led, during the Utah War period, to the Mountain Meadows Massacre. (The settlers heading to California were from Arkansas and just a few months earlier a Mormon apostle had been murdered in Arkansas) While in the Utah period, partially due to immigrants from the south, the tended to have a position not nearly as abolitionist as before those elements did remain in some ways. (I suspect part of this was due to Republican opposition to Mormons as well - there were political calls of eliminating the twin relics of barbarism of slavery and Mormonism)

    “Mormonism always had an uncomfortable relationship with the south.”

    y, the no caffeine thing is just alien to us.. no tea? no coca-cola? magic underwear? mmmmm. no thank ya :)

    additionally, we don’t take lightly to their efforts to seal our dead in wedded bliss to one of their mouldering elders.

    our 20+yr neighbors across the street, tried that w/that w/my paternal grandmother.. my daddy politely told their ‘prozac-ish’ matriarch to go to hell… :)

    p.s. i’ve been ‘kikz’ since the early 90′s.. no disrespect, just fact. :)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mike Zwick

    The original Mormons were by and large Yankees, and their migration west took them into the lands of the Scots-Irish, who descended upon them like wolves to the slaughter, as was often the case when Yankees faced Scots-Irish in an unorganized fashion.
     
    The Mormans moved to Nauvoo, Illinois which is in a culturally very Scots-Irish area.

    The cultural elites of the Yankees ultimately gave rise to a large portion of the Northeastern WASP ascendancy (including the Bush family) in a direction fashion, or influenced immigrants who assimilated into that subculture (including the Kennedy family).
     
    Central and Southern Illinois has had many waves of immigrants, especially Germans and Irish, but the area remains very Scots- Irish. This is also true of the Mississippi Valley south of the Quad Cities and the Ohio Valley. The Scots-Irish did to this area what Puritans did farther north.

    I disagree. The Scots-Irish immigrated into Illinois from Indiana and Kentucky as self-sufficient farmers and stopped when they hit the prairie grasslands of central Illinois, around Springfield. This appears to be because they practiced woodland agriculture, including planned burnings, harvesting fruits and nuts, and some livestock mixed with some crops for household use, not on a scale for the market. The area around Nauvoo is generally considered midlands culture, many Germans and others from Pennsylvania and Ohio, engaging in market agriculture.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The original Mormons were by and large Yankees, and their migration west took them into the lands of the Scots-Irish, who descended upon them like wolves to the slaughter, as was often the case when Yankees faced Scots-Irish in an unorganized fashion.

    The Mormans moved to Nauvoo, Illinois which is in a culturally very Scots-Irish area.

    The cultural elites of the Yankees ultimately gave rise to a large portion of the Northeastern WASP ascendancy (including the Bush family) in a direction fashion, or influenced immigrants who assimilated into that subculture (including the Kennedy family).

    Central and Southern Illinois has had many waves of immigrants, especially Germans and Irish, but the area remains very Scots- Irish. This is also true of the Mississippi Valley south of the Quad Cities and the Ohio Valley. The Scots-Irish did to this area what Puritans did farther north.

    Read More
    • Replies: @PD Shaw
    I disagree. The Scots-Irish immigrated into Illinois from Indiana and Kentucky as self-sufficient farmers and stopped when they hit the prairie grasslands of central Illinois, around Springfield. This appears to be because they practiced woodland agriculture, including planned burnings, harvesting fruits and nuts, and some livestock mixed with some crops for household use, not on a scale for the market. The area around Nauvoo is generally considered midlands culture, many Germans and others from Pennsylvania and Ohio, engaging in market agriculture.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twinkie

    very reminiscent of the Sufi dhikr chants
     
    But with iconography instead of a nature video. :)

    One of my favorite musical albums of all time is "La Gloire de Byzance." Here is an example: https://youtu.be/5XWPdeNKmkU?list=PLUSRfoOcUe4byJHQIZlLWqMJk83c0V6qS

    Clearly you don't have to be an Eastern Christian to appreciate its beauty.

    Hey Twinkie,

    Clearly you don’t have to be an Eastern Christian to appreciate its beauty.

    Agreed – the power of the unaided human voice is spectacular. Unfortunately, in our day, even vocals are auto-tuned to the point that one can’t distinguish one voice from another. But it’s nice that these kinds of chants and traditional hymns are still being perpetuated by people, even if their couple of hundred views are dwarfed by the millions listening to Kanye West.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Wow! That chant is beautiful - very reminiscent of the Sufi dhikr chants (usually Qadiri or Shadhilli) of places like Syria!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bacXsCryE9M

    There is a panoply, a rich tapestry, of historical, traditional (not capital T), and aesthetic elements that can and do deepen one’s attachment to Truth.
     
    Agreed.

    We are so, so close, yet remain apart.
     
    When I was doing some research into the Orthodox churches and their history, as it intertwines with Muslim history, I did come across the fact that both churches do (now) seem to be open to the idea of inter-marriage. What threw me off a bit (coming from my background) was their categorization of this as an "inter-faith" marriage!

    There is a lot of history in the divide - a lot of it bloody. But many years have passed since the worst of it so I think that can be overcome eventually if people are willing to reconcile.

    Peace.

    very reminiscent of the Sufi dhikr chants

    But with iconography instead of a nature video. :)

    One of my favorite musical albums of all time is “La Gloire de Byzance.” Here is an example:

    Clearly you don’t have to be an Eastern Christian to appreciate its beauty.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Twinkie,

    Clearly you don’t have to be an Eastern Christian to appreciate its beauty.
     
    Agreed - the power of the unaided human voice is spectacular. Unfortunately, in our day, even vocals are auto-tuned to the point that one can't distinguish one voice from another. But it's nice that these kinds of chants and traditional hymns are still being perpetuated by people, even if their couple of hundred views are dwarfed by the millions listening to Kanye West.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twinkie

    Aren’t ‘faith and morals’ the crux of transcendent ‘truth’?
     
    Yes, but there is much non-"crux" stuff in religion, Christianity included, some of them important and necessary. There is a panoply, a rich tapestry, of historical, traditional (not capital T), and aesthetic elements that can and do deepen one's attachment to Truth.

    Music, for example: https://youtu.be/8-EfW7gYzns?list=RD8-EfW7gYzns

    Middle Eastern Christians have some of the most beautiful chants.

    Interesting stuff about the Orthodox sacraments. I had thought, after the Great Schism, this was not possible. Very interesting. Now is the inverse of this also recognized as valid from the Orthodox side – do you know?
     
    Sadly the recognition only goes one way, hence my remark about "not pulling this stunt" earlier. For Catholics, Orthodox Sacraments are valid, because the Catholic Church recognizes the validity of the Apostolic succession in the Orthodox Church. So I can technically receive valid Sacraments from an Orthodox priests. However, since the recognition is not reciprocated, the said priest would not offer me Sacraments once he found out I was of Roman Rite. So it's something of which I would avail myself only in an extreme circumstance.

    My dear and sincere hope is that - within my life - I shall see the reunification of Catholic and Orthodox Christendom. We are so, so close, yet remain apart. In the mean time, I am happy to partake in Melkite Greek Mass occasionally. It's a beautiful Catholic Rite: https://youtu.be/I9jO7enCoXU

    When I spent some time in Israel, I became very fond of this Rite.

    A lot of people not familiar with Catholics - and some Catholics in the West - don't realize that there are close to thirty other Rites in the Catholic Church aside from the very well-known two Roman Rites: https://www.ewtn.com/expert/answers/catholic_rites_and_churches.htm

    Wow! That chant is beautiful – very reminiscent of the Sufi dhikr chants (usually Qadiri or Shadhilli) of places like Syria!

    There is a panoply, a rich tapestry, of historical, traditional (not capital T), and aesthetic elements that can and do deepen one’s attachment to Truth.

    Agreed.

    We are so, so close, yet remain apart.

    When I was doing some research into the Orthodox churches and their history, as it intertwines with Muslim history, I did come across the fact that both churches do (now) seem to be open to the idea of inter-marriage. What threw me off a bit (coming from my background) was their categorization of this as an “inter-faith” marriage!

    There is a lot of history in the divide – a lot of it bloody. But many years have passed since the worst of it so I think that can be overcome eventually if people are willing to reconcile.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    very reminiscent of the Sufi dhikr chants
     
    But with iconography instead of a nature video. :)

    One of my favorite musical albums of all time is "La Gloire de Byzance." Here is an example: https://youtu.be/5XWPdeNKmkU?list=PLUSRfoOcUe4byJHQIZlLWqMJk83c0V6qS

    Clearly you don't have to be an Eastern Christian to appreciate its beauty.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    He was the son of a schoolteacher father and the daughter of a man who ran a country store in Tennessee.

    Part of the educated elite and merchant class.

    Passes for patrician in a state split between hillbillies and sharecroppers.

    a schoolteacher

    I know being a public school teacher is a joke nowadays, especially among conservatives, but it was not that long ago in rural/small town America that being a teacher meant – if not exactly “elite” – being an elder of the community as well as a member of its intelligentsia. The same goes for a country doctor (whose social role as a town elder has all been destroyed in most modern America, especially in urban and suburban areas).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey Twinkie,

    Thanks again for more info on this subject (also thanks for Razib for keeping these open threads that can go down tangents like this).


    Truths are immutable.
     
    Makes sense.

    Ecumenical councils (and popes) are only infallible on matters of faith and morals.
     
    Aren't 'faith and morals' the crux of transcendent 'truth'? If so, are you saying that once the council has come out with a position (on faith and morals) then it never changes?

    Interesting stuff about the Orthodox sacraments. I had thought, after the Great Schism, this was not possible. Very interesting. Now is the inverse of this also recognized as valid from the Orthodox side - do you know?

    Peace.

    Thanks again

    You are most welcome. It’s my pleasure.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey Twinkie,

    Thanks again for more info on this subject (also thanks for Razib for keeping these open threads that can go down tangents like this).


    Truths are immutable.
     
    Makes sense.

    Ecumenical councils (and popes) are only infallible on matters of faith and morals.
     
    Aren't 'faith and morals' the crux of transcendent 'truth'? If so, are you saying that once the council has come out with a position (on faith and morals) then it never changes?

    Interesting stuff about the Orthodox sacraments. I had thought, after the Great Schism, this was not possible. Very interesting. Now is the inverse of this also recognized as valid from the Orthodox side - do you know?

    Peace.

    Aren’t ‘faith and morals’ the crux of transcendent ‘truth’?

    Yes, but there is much non-”crux” stuff in religion, Christianity included, some of them important and necessary. There is a panoply, a rich tapestry, of historical, traditional (not capital T), and aesthetic elements that can and do deepen one’s attachment to Truth.

    Music, for example:

    Middle Eastern Christians have some of the most beautiful chants.

    Interesting stuff about the Orthodox sacraments. I had thought, after the Great Schism, this was not possible. Very interesting. Now is the inverse of this also recognized as valid from the Orthodox side – do you know?

    Sadly the recognition only goes one way, hence my remark about “not pulling this stunt” earlier. For Catholics, Orthodox Sacraments are valid, because the Catholic Church recognizes the validity of the Apostolic succession in the Orthodox Church. So I can technically receive valid Sacraments from an Orthodox priests. However, since the recognition is not reciprocated, the said priest would not offer me Sacraments once he found out I was of Roman Rite. So it’s something of which I would avail myself only in an extreme circumstance.

    My dear and sincere hope is that – within my life – I shall see the reunification of Catholic and Orthodox Christendom. We are so, so close, yet remain apart. In the mean time, I am happy to partake in Melkite Greek Mass occasionally. It’s a beautiful Catholic Rite:

    When I spent some time in Israel, I became very fond of this Rite.

    A lot of people not familiar with Catholics – and some Catholics in the West – don’t realize that there are close to thirty other Rites in the Catholic Church aside from the very well-known two Roman Rites: https://www.ewtn.com/expert/answers/catholic_rites_and_churches.htm

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Wow! That chant is beautiful - very reminiscent of the Sufi dhikr chants (usually Qadiri or Shadhilli) of places like Syria!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bacXsCryE9M

    There is a panoply, a rich tapestry, of historical, traditional (not capital T), and aesthetic elements that can and do deepen one’s attachment to Truth.
     
    Agreed.

    We are so, so close, yet remain apart.
     
    When I was doing some research into the Orthodox churches and their history, as it intertwines with Muslim history, I did come across the fact that both churches do (now) seem to be open to the idea of inter-marriage. What threw me off a bit (coming from my background) was their categorization of this as an "inter-faith" marriage!

    There is a lot of history in the divide - a lot of it bloody. But many years have passed since the worst of it so I think that can be overcome eventually if people are willing to reconcile.

    Peace.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ohwilleke
    Francis of Assisi was the historical exemplar of that notion. He was one of only a handful of mendicant preachers who carefully kept his dogma orthodox despite a radically different style of honoring that dogma, which is why his movement became an officially recognized and beloved Holy Order, while most of his peers were persecuted as heretics sooner or later.

    Francis of Assisi was the historical exemplar of that notion.

    Always a delightful saint for my children. Indeed, we just celebrated his Feast day earlier in the month, and took our dogs to be blessed!

    All dogs go to heaven: http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/dogheaven.asp

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Bill P

    I am always very skeptical of claims like this. The reading I’ve done demonstrates that all non-black groups in the South disliked slavery for a generation or two, but then became tolerant of it at the very least. More often they became enthusiastic supporters and practitioners of the institution. This includes the Native Americans living in that area.
     
    Yeah, that's pretty much the case. Self-interest dictates politics. Scots Irish generals like Stonewall Jackson and Nathan Bedford Forrest had no problem with slavery because they personally profited from it. On the other hand, Northern Scots Irish like Ulysses Grant and Phil Sheridan had no use for the institution.

    The truth is that Scots Irish Presbyterianism as it existed circa 1776 was anti-slavery, but by 1860 Scots Irish were already assimilated enough that they took on the customs of their region. And who wouldn't expect these people to raise the banner of war for its own sake?

    Sheridan was an Irish Catholic, either an immigrant himself or the son of immigrants.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @PD Shaw
    "I feel the need to push back against “the Southerners are Scotch-Irish” meme that Albion’s Seed and this blog have made so popular."

    Perhaps repeating a point, but Albion's Seed classified Scots-Irish with lowland Scots and Northern English, referring either to Northern British or Borderlanders.

    Second, looking at people who signed the Declaration of Independence and served as generals for the Confederacy is a poor sampling of Americans. These are elites. The Borderlanders mostly arrived btw/ 1765-1775, so they are not establishment figures.

    Third, the Borderlanders appear to have married younger, emigrated with more women than any group outside of New England, and had more children both in and out of wedlock, so the 1790 census may not adequately describe demographic impact.

    I think you are right that there appears to be a tendency to equate Southerners with the Scots-Irish, but Albion's Seed has a quarter of its contents dedicated to the Distressed Cavaliers and their servants, which formed the base of the South. Fischer even has the temerity to identify African-Americans as Southerners in this sense (contributors and propagators). But the Northern British were more Western than Southern.

    has the temerity to identify African-Americans as Southerners

    Depending upon who you want to listen to they got the Scotch-Irish/Cavalier genes/culture.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @yaqub the mad scientist
    This map, as some have pointed out, is an indicator of Flight from White, Avoidance of Anglo, etc.
    Much of the South has serious undercounting. Certainly the self reporting of "American" is a factor, but Englishness just doesn't assert itself as a culture anymore- since Englishness in the current prog taxonomy is peak White. It's the founding stock culture, and the the "hegemon" must be rooted out.

    A simple run through of surnames would show that English is the primary ancestry of even the upland South, though it is true that the Borders/Scots-Irish thing becomes a bigger factor there.

    I grew up in a very English part of the deep South, and the cultural influence was obvious. I remember my grandmother's accent and diction to be so formal that it bordered on RP. She and most of her friends had afternoon tea, a reading corner, all that. My grandfather and his friends were all very conscious of their English ancestry, and all of them were real Anglophiles.They spoke with a guttural, somewhat nasal drawl that pretty much has disappeared. Our local Episcopal parish held on to the 1928 prayerbook long after the new one came out. My father's side of the family came to Virginia in the 1620's and helped settle Southern lowlands.

    The nearby hills was where the Other, the redneck/cracker folk were- there was a disdain for them that still existed up to the 1970's/1980's when I was growing up in our small farm town.


    The original Mormons were by and large Yankees, and their migration west took them into the lands of the Scots-Irish, who descended upon them like wolves to the slaughter, as was often the case when Yankees faced Scots-Irish in an unorganized fashion

    Harsh statement, Razib, but there's some truth to it, unfortunately. As one fellow I knew spoke of his people: "When we get one that's scared, that's when we pour it on."

    Behavior matters. Social pathologies and the personal disorder which has been a feature of Southern cultural life since its inception...

    True. One of the biggest shocks that Yankees get when they spend any real time here is the mixture of religiosity and hedonism. It's parodied to death in movies and Southern Gothic novels, but seeing it in real life is something else. Their Puritan taste for the absolute just can't handle it. It would be like a Cathar suddenly experiencing the Vatican under the Borgias- fine words and imagery with shameful behavior. It wasn't until I spent some time up North that I realized how truly wild and hard partying Southerners were. Northerners, even the hip set, seemed way more straitlaced. Of course, therein lies a lot of why they are ahead, and we're behind.

    A simple run through of surnames would show that English is the primary ancestry of even the upland South

    Can you do a simple sort of Smith, Johnson, Reed(Reid), Wilson and Green for me? Limited of course to Scottish, English or Scotch-Irish.

    I noticed that you didn’t give me a shout-out on the division of Tennessee into western sharecroppers or eastern hillbillies. Of course your comment was much more informative and complete.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    tended to elect educated, relatively cultured people

    People like Theodore Bilbo?

    His airs made him lose the yahoo vote, just like Romney lost it.

    Not from the Delta. Other end of the state. Geography matters.

    Memo: “educated and cultured” does not always mean progressive. I knew wealthy planters who had gone to Harvard and collected fine art, but they were pretty conservative.

    Memo: Populist men of the people can be left or right. Case in point: Bilbo, the “King of the Rednecks”- hated by the left and the planter class.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twinkie

    From my reading of history the Pope’s role and relationship to the rest of the clerical community (and public at large) has been an evolving one, correct? For instance, the Pope prior to the Peace of Westphalia, etc.
     
    Given that popes used to have an army and would war with other secular rulers, yes. But the phenomenon of Apostolic succession remains the same, and constitutes the basis of papal authority.

    the need of an ecumenical council/conference on the scale of Vatican II that would likely be required
     
    Even that is not enough. Not everything that comes out of an ecumenical council is canonical. Truths are immutable. Ecumenical councils (and popes) are only infallible on matters of faith and morals. Nothing else. And ex cathedra pronouncements are very rare.

    I don't want to get into this too much (it's a well-trodden subject among Catholics), but let's just say that (some) people tend to overplay the changes that Vatican II brought, which have been largely aesthetic. Many of such stylistic changes are displeasing to me, but they did not change Dogma. So even when I am on the road and must bring myself to a bongo-playing parish, the Sacrements remain valid. For that matter, Orthodox Sacraments are valid for me too (though the Orthodox priest in question would be most disturbed if he found out I was a Catholic - it's not a stunt I would pull except in a dire circumstance).

    Francis of Assisi was the historical exemplar of that notion. He was one of only a handful of mendicant preachers who carefully kept his dogma orthodox despite a radically different style of honoring that dogma, which is why his movement became an officially recognized and beloved Holy Order, while most of his peers were persecuted as heretics sooner or later.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    Francis of Assisi was the historical exemplar of that notion.
     
    Always a delightful saint for my children. Indeed, we just celebrated his Feast day earlier in the month, and took our dogs to be blessed!

    All dogs go to heaven: http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/dogheaven.asp
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @yaqub the mad scientist
    I don't think anybody's arguing your point about his more "worldly" airs making him lose popularity. The point is that he lived in an area that was not as hospitable to a patrician/educated elite as in, say, west Tennessee, or the outlier of Chattanooga, which has a mix of upland and lowland South characteristics with a history of cultured outsiders moving in. As the years went by, he probably just didn't want to keep up with populist appearances-as in the well-known country fiddler persona of his youth.

    An example of how people with a more patrician sensibility were historically electable would be Mississippi, specifically the Delta region. Historically, it has tended to elect educated, relatively cultured people to local and national offices (think of novelist Walker Percy's family)- and that rubbed off on neighboring parts of the state to the point that Haley Barbour quipped about how populist men-in-overalls types generally don't get elected to offices beyond the county level. People like their fratboys-in-a-suit type. Even now, a few of those towns have Chinese and Jewish mayors.

    tended to elect educated, relatively cultured people

    People like Theodore Bilbo?

    His airs made him lose the yahoo vote, just like Romney lost it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @yaqub the mad scientist
    Not from the Delta. Other end of the state. Geography matters.

    Memo: "educated and cultured" does not always mean progressive. I knew wealthy planters who had gone to Harvard and collected fine art, but they were pretty conservative.

    Memo: Populist men of the people can be left or right. Case in point: Bilbo, the "King of the Rednecks"- hated by the left and the planter class.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    It seems we have different ideas about the significance of what it meant to have been an educated person or a member of the merchant class in early 20th century Tennessee. I stand by my statement that the patrician persona of Gore cost him the election. Whether he was a parvenu or not is a minor detail. The fact that he could not or would not disguise these attributes cost him the Presidency.

    BTW, I hope your boys learn to play football before Saturday, I hate boring blowouts.

    I don’t think anybody’s arguing your point about his more “worldly” airs making him lose popularity. The point is that he lived in an area that was not as hospitable to a patrician/educated elite as in, say, west Tennessee, or the outlier of Chattanooga, which has a mix of upland and lowland South characteristics with a history of cultured outsiders moving in. As the years went by, he probably just didn’t want to keep up with populist appearances-as in the well-known country fiddler persona of his youth.

    An example of how people with a more patrician sensibility were historically electable would be Mississippi, specifically the Delta region. Historically, it has tended to elect educated, relatively cultured people to local and national offices (think of novelist Walker Percy’s family)- and that rubbed off on neighboring parts of the state to the point that Haley Barbour quipped about how populist men-in-overalls types generally don’t get elected to offices beyond the county level. People like their fratboys-in-a-suit type. Even now, a few of those towns have Chinese and Jewish mayors.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    tended to elect educated, relatively cultured people

    People like Theodore Bilbo?

    His airs made him lose the yahoo vote, just like Romney lost it.

    , @Uncle Remus
    Gore's snotty personality helped him lose in 2000. He learned this by living in D.C. as the son of a senator and attending a prestigious prep school. Snotty preppy attitudes are not the result of "patrician" ancestry, most certainly in this case.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @yaqub the mad scientist
    It's impossible to seriously discuss Tennessee seriously without considering geography. As a very weirdly demarked state, Tennessee slices through several ecosystems that attracted people with different goals, political views, and backgrounds. The west, of course, has most of the fertile ground, thus a large Anglo/African population based on this historical slavery economy. The Nashville basin had this, too, but to a slightly lesser degree due to more barrens lands more suitable for livestock. Pushing eastward is the Cumberland Plateau and Appalachians, which do not lend themselves to large-scale farming. These areas had a lot more subsistence farming and little slavery. It's no accident, then, that this was largely a Unionist area in the Civil War where support for Republicans was larger. Al Gore Sr came from an area that had little slavery or much of a patrician class.

    From Wiki:

    During a December 1987 interview with Playboy, Gore Vidal, a maternal grandson of Thomas Gore suggested that Albert Gore was of Anglo-Irish descent

    [Thomas] Gore was born on December 10, 1870, near Embry, Mississippi in Webster County, Mississippi, the son of Caroline Elizabeth (Wingo) and Thomas Madison Gore.[2][a] The Gore family was one of the nineteen original families that owned farmlands in what later became the capital of the United States, the District of Columbia. The Gores were Anglo-Irish from Donegal and arrived in North America at the end of the seventeenth century and tended to intermarry with other Anglo-Irish families, particularly in Virginia.[4]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Uncle Remus
    Iffen, you are short on understanding social relations in Tennessee. A graduate of a state teachers' college, such as Gore Sr., neither was nor is "part of the educated elite". Nor was the owner of a country store in the early 20th century, selling chewing tobacco, candy and flour to farming families, a member of a "merchant class".

    There were and are patricians in Tennessee but the Gore forbears were not among them.

    It’s impossible to seriously discuss Tennessee seriously without considering geography. As a very weirdly demarked state, Tennessee slices through several ecosystems that attracted people with different goals, political views, and backgrounds. The west, of course, has most of the fertile ground, thus a large Anglo/African population based on this historical slavery economy. The Nashville basin had this, too, but to a slightly lesser degree due to more barrens lands more suitable for livestock. Pushing eastward is the Cumberland Plateau and Appalachians, which do not lend themselves to large-scale farming. These areas had a lot more subsistence farming and little slavery. It’s no accident, then, that this was largely a Unionist area in the Civil War where support for Republicans was larger. Al Gore Sr came from an area that had little slavery or much of a patrician class.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    From Wiki:

    During a December 1987 interview with Playboy, Gore Vidal, a maternal grandson of Thomas Gore suggested that Albert Gore was of Anglo-Irish descent

    [Thomas] Gore was born on December 10, 1870, near Embry, Mississippi in Webster County, Mississippi, the son of Caroline Elizabeth (Wingo) and Thomas Madison Gore.[2][a] The Gore family was one of the nineteen original families that owned farmlands in what later became the capital of the United States, the District of Columbia. The Gores were Anglo-Irish from Donegal and arrived in North America at the end of the seventeenth century and tended to intermarry with other Anglo-Irish families, particularly in Virginia.[4]
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twinkie

    From my reading of history the Pope’s role and relationship to the rest of the clerical community (and public at large) has been an evolving one, correct? For instance, the Pope prior to the Peace of Westphalia, etc.
     
    Given that popes used to have an army and would war with other secular rulers, yes. But the phenomenon of Apostolic succession remains the same, and constitutes the basis of papal authority.

    the need of an ecumenical council/conference on the scale of Vatican II that would likely be required
     
    Even that is not enough. Not everything that comes out of an ecumenical council is canonical. Truths are immutable. Ecumenical councils (and popes) are only infallible on matters of faith and morals. Nothing else. And ex cathedra pronouncements are very rare.

    I don't want to get into this too much (it's a well-trodden subject among Catholics), but let's just say that (some) people tend to overplay the changes that Vatican II brought, which have been largely aesthetic. Many of such stylistic changes are displeasing to me, but they did not change Dogma. So even when I am on the road and must bring myself to a bongo-playing parish, the Sacrements remain valid. For that matter, Orthodox Sacraments are valid for me too (though the Orthodox priest in question would be most disturbed if he found out I was a Catholic - it's not a stunt I would pull except in a dire circumstance).

    Hey Twinkie,

    Thanks again for more info on this subject (also thanks for Razib for keeping these open threads that can go down tangents like this).

    Truths are immutable.

    Makes sense.

    Ecumenical councils (and popes) are only infallible on matters of faith and morals.

    Aren’t ‘faith and morals’ the crux of transcendent ‘truth’? If so, are you saying that once the council has come out with a position (on faith and morals) then it never changes?

    Interesting stuff about the Orthodox sacraments. I had thought, after the Great Schism, this was not possible. Very interesting. Now is the inverse of this also recognized as valid from the Orthodox side – do you know?

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    Aren’t ‘faith and morals’ the crux of transcendent ‘truth’?
     
    Yes, but there is much non-"crux" stuff in religion, Christianity included, some of them important and necessary. There is a panoply, a rich tapestry, of historical, traditional (not capital T), and aesthetic elements that can and do deepen one's attachment to Truth.

    Music, for example: https://youtu.be/8-EfW7gYzns?list=RD8-EfW7gYzns

    Middle Eastern Christians have some of the most beautiful chants.

    Interesting stuff about the Orthodox sacraments. I had thought, after the Great Schism, this was not possible. Very interesting. Now is the inverse of this also recognized as valid from the Orthodox side – do you know?
     
    Sadly the recognition only goes one way, hence my remark about "not pulling this stunt" earlier. For Catholics, Orthodox Sacraments are valid, because the Catholic Church recognizes the validity of the Apostolic succession in the Orthodox Church. So I can technically receive valid Sacraments from an Orthodox priests. However, since the recognition is not reciprocated, the said priest would not offer me Sacraments once he found out I was of Roman Rite. So it's something of which I would avail myself only in an extreme circumstance.

    My dear and sincere hope is that - within my life - I shall see the reunification of Catholic and Orthodox Christendom. We are so, so close, yet remain apart. In the mean time, I am happy to partake in Melkite Greek Mass occasionally. It's a beautiful Catholic Rite: https://youtu.be/I9jO7enCoXU

    When I spent some time in Israel, I became very fond of this Rite.

    A lot of people not familiar with Catholics - and some Catholics in the West - don't realize that there are close to thirty other Rites in the Catholic Church aside from the very well-known two Roman Rites: https://www.ewtn.com/expert/answers/catholic_rites_and_churches.htm
    , @Twinkie

    Thanks again
     
    You are most welcome. It's my pleasure.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • This map, as some have pointed out, is an indicator of Flight from White, Avoidance of Anglo, etc.
    Much of the South has serious undercounting. Certainly the self reporting of “American” is a factor, but Englishness just doesn’t assert itself as a culture anymore- since Englishness in the current prog taxonomy is peak White. It’s the founding stock culture, and the the “hegemon” must be rooted out.

    A simple run through of surnames would show that English is the primary ancestry of even the upland South, though it is true that the Borders/Scots-Irish thing becomes a bigger factor there.

    I grew up in a very English part of the deep South, and the cultural influence was obvious. I remember my grandmother’s accent and diction to be so formal that it bordered on RP. She and most of her friends had afternoon tea, a reading corner, all that. My grandfather and his friends were all very conscious of their English ancestry, and all of them were real Anglophiles.They spoke with a guttural, somewhat nasal drawl that pretty much has disappeared. Our local Episcopal parish held on to the 1928 prayerbook long after the new one came out. My father’s side of the family came to Virginia in the 1620′s and helped settle Southern lowlands.

    The nearby hills was where the Other, the redneck/cracker folk were- there was a disdain for them that still existed up to the 1970′s/1980′s when I was growing up in our small farm town.


    The original Mormons were by and large Yankees, and their migration west took them into the lands of the Scots-Irish, who descended upon them like wolves to the slaughter, as was often the case when Yankees faced Scots-Irish in an unorganized fashion

    Harsh statement, Razib, but there’s some truth to it, unfortunately. As one fellow I knew spoke of his people: “When we get one that’s scared, that’s when we pour it on.”

    Behavior matters. Social pathologies and the personal disorder which has been a feature of Southern cultural life since its inception…

    True. One of the biggest shocks that Yankees get when they spend any real time here is the mixture of religiosity and hedonism. It’s parodied to death in movies and Southern Gothic novels, but seeing it in real life is something else. Their Puritan taste for the absolute just can’t handle it. It would be like a Cathar suddenly experiencing the Vatican under the Borgias- fine words and imagery with shameful behavior. It wasn’t until I spent some time up North that I realized how truly wild and hard partying Southerners were. Northerners, even the hip set, seemed way more straitlaced. Of course, therein lies a lot of why they are ahead, and we’re behind.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    A simple run through of surnames would show that English is the primary ancestry of even the upland South

    Can you do a simple sort of Smith, Johnson, Reed(Reid), Wilson and Green for me? Limited of course to Scottish, English or Scotch-Irish.

    I noticed that you didn't give me a shout-out on the division of Tennessee into western sharecroppers or eastern hillbillies. Of course your comment was much more informative and complete.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Uncle Remus
    Iffen, you are short on understanding social relations in Tennessee. A graduate of a state teachers' college, such as Gore Sr., neither was nor is "part of the educated elite". Nor was the owner of a country store in the early 20th century, selling chewing tobacco, candy and flour to farming families, a member of a "merchant class".

    There were and are patricians in Tennessee but the Gore forbears were not among them.

    It seems we have different ideas about the significance of what it meant to have been an educated person or a member of the merchant class in early 20th century Tennessee. I stand by my statement that the patrician persona of Gore cost him the election. Whether he was a parvenu or not is a minor detail. The fact that he could not or would not disguise these attributes cost him the Presidency.

    BTW, I hope your boys learn to play football before Saturday, I hate boring blowouts.

    Read More
    • Replies: @yaqub the mad scientist
    I don't think anybody's arguing your point about his more "worldly" airs making him lose popularity. The point is that he lived in an area that was not as hospitable to a patrician/educated elite as in, say, west Tennessee, or the outlier of Chattanooga, which has a mix of upland and lowland South characteristics with a history of cultured outsiders moving in. As the years went by, he probably just didn't want to keep up with populist appearances-as in the well-known country fiddler persona of his youth.

    An example of how people with a more patrician sensibility were historically electable would be Mississippi, specifically the Delta region. Historically, it has tended to elect educated, relatively cultured people to local and national offices (think of novelist Walker Percy's family)- and that rubbed off on neighboring parts of the state to the point that Haley Barbour quipped about how populist men-in-overalls types generally don't get elected to offices beyond the county level. People like their fratboys-in-a-suit type. Even now, a few of those towns have Chinese and Jewish mayors.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    He was the son of a schoolteacher father and the daughter of a man who ran a country store in Tennessee.

    Part of the educated elite and merchant class.

    Passes for patrician in a state split between hillbillies and sharecroppers.

    And he does have a patrician name.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Again Twinkie, thanks for the clarifications.


    due to significant constraints they have on their powers
     
    From my reading of history the Pope's role and relationship to the rest of the clerical community (and public at large) has been an evolving one, correct? For instance, the Pope prior to the Peace of Westphalia, etc.

    For the same reason, leftists who got all excited at certain public pronouncements of Pope Francis are very much likely to be disappointed.
     
    Yeah, I think they don't understand the significance of the need of an ecumenical council/conference on the scale of Vatican II that would likely be required.

    Peace.

    From my reading of history the Pope’s role and relationship to the rest of the clerical community (and public at large) has been an evolving one, correct? For instance, the Pope prior to the Peace of Westphalia, etc.

    Given that popes used to have an army and would war with other secular rulers, yes. But the phenomenon of Apostolic succession remains the same, and constitutes the basis of papal authority.

    the need of an ecumenical council/conference on the scale of Vatican II that would likely be required

    Even that is not enough. Not everything that comes out of an ecumenical council is canonical. Truths are immutable. Ecumenical councils (and popes) are only infallible on matters of faith and morals. Nothing else. And ex cathedra pronouncements are very rare.

    I don’t want to get into this too much (it’s a well-trodden subject among Catholics), but let’s just say that (some) people tend to overplay the changes that Vatican II brought, which have been largely aesthetic. Many of such stylistic changes are displeasing to me, but they did not change Dogma. So even when I am on the road and must bring myself to a bongo-playing parish, the Sacrements remain valid. For that matter, Orthodox Sacraments are valid for me too (though the Orthodox priest in question would be most disturbed if he found out I was a Catholic – it’s not a stunt I would pull except in a dire circumstance).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Twinkie,

    Thanks again for more info on this subject (also thanks for Razib for keeping these open threads that can go down tangents like this).


    Truths are immutable.
     
    Makes sense.

    Ecumenical councils (and popes) are only infallible on matters of faith and morals.
     
    Aren't 'faith and morals' the crux of transcendent 'truth'? If so, are you saying that once the council has come out with a position (on faith and morals) then it never changes?

    Interesting stuff about the Orthodox sacraments. I had thought, after the Great Schism, this was not possible. Very interesting. Now is the inverse of this also recognized as valid from the Orthodox side - do you know?

    Peace.

    , @ohwilleke
    Francis of Assisi was the historical exemplar of that notion. He was one of only a handful of mendicant preachers who carefully kept his dogma orthodox despite a radically different style of honoring that dogma, which is why his movement became an officially recognized and beloved Holy Order, while most of his peers were persecuted as heretics sooner or later.
    , @Vmartini
    I'm a lapsed Catholic myself, but my understanding is that the actual documents from the Council are quite orthodox. It was the "spirit of Vatican II" (or the interpretation there of) that led to the various liberalizations. Remember, as a bishop and cardinal, John Paul II was an supporter of the Council and as pope referred to it often. He just didn't interpret it the way liberals did.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    He was the son of a schoolteacher father and the daughter of a man who ran a country store in Tennessee.

    Part of the educated elite and merchant class.

    Passes for patrician in a state split between hillbillies and sharecroppers.

    Iffen, you are short on understanding social relations in Tennessee. A graduate of a state teachers’ college, such as Gore Sr., neither was nor is “part of the educated elite”. Nor was the owner of a country store in the early 20th century, selling chewing tobacco, candy and flour to farming families, a member of a “merchant class”.

    There were and are patricians in Tennessee but the Gore forbears were not among them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    It seems we have different ideas about the significance of what it meant to have been an educated person or a member of the merchant class in early 20th century Tennessee. I stand by my statement that the patrician persona of Gore cost him the election. Whether he was a parvenu or not is a minor detail. The fact that he could not or would not disguise these attributes cost him the Presidency.

    BTW, I hope your boys learn to play football before Saturday, I hate boring blowouts.

    , @yaqub the mad scientist
    It's impossible to seriously discuss Tennessee seriously without considering geography. As a very weirdly demarked state, Tennessee slices through several ecosystems that attracted people with different goals, political views, and backgrounds. The west, of course, has most of the fertile ground, thus a large Anglo/African population based on this historical slavery economy. The Nashville basin had this, too, but to a slightly lesser degree due to more barrens lands more suitable for livestock. Pushing eastward is the Cumberland Plateau and Appalachians, which do not lend themselves to large-scale farming. These areas had a lot more subsistence farming and little slavery. It's no accident, then, that this was largely a Unionist area in the Civil War where support for Republicans was larger. Al Gore Sr came from an area that had little slavery or much of a patrician class.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twinkie

    I was talking more in a central hierarchy for deliberation and final verdicts and such.
     
    The Pope doesn't get the last word on much at all. People who think the Vatican is some sort of an autocracy doesn't know much about Catholicism at all.

    Many a times I have heard such remarks, and responded, "You must be confusing us with the Mormons. The Pope is not a Mormon 'prophet' - he can't just change the enduring dogma, because he feels like it or feels pressured by the rest of society."

    Indeed there were times - many times - I and other faithful Catholics wished Pope John Paul II or Pope Benedict XVI would restore discipline and remove or censure errant bishops, priests, dioceses, parishes, orders, etc. but were unable or unwilling to do so likely due to significant constraints they have on their powers.

    The Church is a church of sinners, with all that entails.

    For the same reason, leftists who got all excited at certain public pronouncements of Pope Francis are very much likely to be disappointed.

    Again Twinkie, thanks for the clarifications.

    due to significant constraints they have on their powers

    From my reading of history the Pope’s role and relationship to the rest of the clerical community (and public at large) has been an evolving one, correct? For instance, the Pope prior to the Peace of Westphalia, etc.

    For the same reason, leftists who got all excited at certain public pronouncements of Pope Francis are very much likely to be disappointed.

    Yeah, I think they don’t understand the significance of the need of an ecumenical council/conference on the scale of Vatican II that would likely be required.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    From my reading of history the Pope’s role and relationship to the rest of the clerical community (and public at large) has been an evolving one, correct? For instance, the Pope prior to the Peace of Westphalia, etc.
     
    Given that popes used to have an army and would war with other secular rulers, yes. But the phenomenon of Apostolic succession remains the same, and constitutes the basis of papal authority.

    the need of an ecumenical council/conference on the scale of Vatican II that would likely be required
     
    Even that is not enough. Not everything that comes out of an ecumenical council is canonical. Truths are immutable. Ecumenical councils (and popes) are only infallible on matters of faith and morals. Nothing else. And ex cathedra pronouncements are very rare.

    I don't want to get into this too much (it's a well-trodden subject among Catholics), but let's just say that (some) people tend to overplay the changes that Vatican II brought, which have been largely aesthetic. Many of such stylistic changes are displeasing to me, but they did not change Dogma. So even when I am on the road and must bring myself to a bongo-playing parish, the Sacrements remain valid. For that matter, Orthodox Sacraments are valid for me too (though the Orthodox priest in question would be most disturbed if he found out I was a Catholic - it's not a stunt I would pull except in a dire circumstance).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • If I am not mistaken, the high English ancestry rates in Utah are due to phenomenally successful Mormon missionary work in Great Britain in the 1840s and 1850s, causing a Mormon migration.

    My great-grandfather, for example, was part of it. He served a mission in Great Britain, baptized many people (hundreds, I believe), and chartered a ship, brought them all to the US, and then led the wagon train to Utah. This happened with many different missionaries in England. The fact that the church has its roots in New England is less of a factor explaining the English fraction of the population.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Uncle Remus
    Al Gore's "inherent patrician qualities" are an illusion. He was the son of a schoolteacher father and the daughter of a man who ran a country store in Tennessee. When the father, skilled at politics, became a Tennessee senator the family lived at the Fairfax Hotel on Embassy Row in Washington and Al was sent to St Alban's, the prestigious school by the National Cathedral. He added a veneer of sophistication, but he was a backcountry boy nevertheless. Bill (Clinton) Blythe
    was from the same backcountry background, just a little trashier.

    He was the son of a schoolteacher father and the daughter of a man who ran a country store in Tennessee.

    Part of the educated elite and merchant class.

    Passes for patrician in a state split between hillbillies and sharecroppers.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Uncle Remus
    Iffen, you are short on understanding social relations in Tennessee. A graduate of a state teachers' college, such as Gore Sr., neither was nor is "part of the educated elite". Nor was the owner of a country store in the early 20th century, selling chewing tobacco, candy and flour to farming families, a member of a "merchant class".

    There were and are patricians in Tennessee but the Gore forbears were not among them.
    , @Twinkie
    And he does have a patrician name.
    , @Twinkie

    a schoolteacher
     
    I know being a public school teacher is a joke nowadays, especially among conservatives, but it was not that long ago in rural/small town America that being a teacher meant - if not exactly "elite" - being an elder of the community as well as a member of its intelligentsia. The same goes for a country doctor (whose social role as a town elder has all been destroyed in most modern America, especially in urban and suburban areas).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey Twinkie,

    Yeah, I didn't mean the 'new revelation' stuff, I know the pope is not a prophet. I was talking more in a central hierarchy for deliberation and final verdicts and such.

    It is that very enduring and permanent quality – regarding morality and doctrine – that attracted me to Catholicism.
     
    My own spiritual teacher speaks highly of Catholicism, he remembers fondly attending a Catholic school in Pakistan.

    And thanks for the other clarifications on Catholicism and that excellent article - reminds me a lot of the Islamic position on this subject actually. It's funny, a couple of centuries ago, we were cast in the Orientalist writings as the hedonistic, erotically-charged culture (especially by the Victorians) and now we are accused of being at the opposite end of the spectrum. My, how times change... :)

    Peace.

    I was talking more in a central hierarchy for deliberation and final verdicts and such.

    The Pope doesn’t get the last word on much at all. People who think the Vatican is some sort of an autocracy doesn’t know much about Catholicism at all.

    Many a times I have heard such remarks, and responded, “You must be confusing us with the Mormons. The Pope is not a Mormon ‘prophet’ – he can’t just change the enduring dogma, because he feels like it or feels pressured by the rest of society.”

    Indeed there were times – many times – I and other faithful Catholics wished Pope John Paul II or Pope Benedict XVI would restore discipline and remove or censure errant bishops, priests, dioceses, parishes, orders, etc. but were unable or unwilling to do so likely due to significant constraints they have on their powers.

    The Church is a church of sinners, with all that entails.

    For the same reason, leftists who got all excited at certain public pronouncements of Pope Francis are very much likely to be disappointed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Again Twinkie, thanks for the clarifications.


    due to significant constraints they have on their powers
     
    From my reading of history the Pope's role and relationship to the rest of the clerical community (and public at large) has been an evolving one, correct? For instance, the Pope prior to the Peace of Westphalia, etc.

    For the same reason, leftists who got all excited at certain public pronouncements of Pope Francis are very much likely to be disappointed.
     
    Yeah, I think they don't understand the significance of the need of an ecumenical council/conference on the scale of Vatican II that would likely be required.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twinkie

    If I remember correctly, the pope serves a similar (though not completely analogous) function in Catholicism.
     
    You are misinformed. The Catholic Church does not have a new revelation every time it is politically expedient. It is that very enduring and permanent quality - regarding morality and doctrine - that attracted me to Catholicism.

    The Church is also not as hierarchical or monolithic as the Mormon governing structure; it tolerates much disobedience and dissession amongst its priests and flock. To be sure, clericalism exists, but there is a constant reminder that the Church is the whole body of believers, not just the clerical establishment.

    I should note that, in my personal experience, Mormons as individuals and families are generally wonderful, moral, and communal people. They make great neighbors and friends, provided of course that they are not the majority and dominate the politics of the shared community. In the latter case, they tend to impose their puritanical streaks* on others who do not share them, as well as behave in an exclusionary manner to outsiders.

    *The Catholic Church is sometimes accused of having a similar streak today because it opposes things like homosexual marriage and such, but I would simply point to Bishop Barron's reflection on this in response: http://www.wordonfire.org/resources/article/sex-love-and-god-the-catholic-answer-to-puritanism-and-nietzcheanism/455/

    Hey Twinkie,

    Yeah, I didn’t mean the ‘new revelation’ stuff, I know the pope is not a prophet. I was talking more in a central hierarchy for deliberation and final verdicts and such.

    It is that very enduring and permanent quality – regarding morality and doctrine – that attracted me to Catholicism.

    My own spiritual teacher speaks highly of Catholicism, he remembers fondly attending a Catholic school in Pakistan.

    And thanks for the other clarifications on Catholicism and that excellent article – reminds me a lot of the Islamic position on this subject actually. It’s funny, a couple of centuries ago, we were cast in the Orientalist writings as the hedonistic, erotically-charged culture (especially by the Victorians) and now we are accused of being at the opposite end of the spectrum. My, how times change… :)

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    I was talking more in a central hierarchy for deliberation and final verdicts and such.
     
    The Pope doesn't get the last word on much at all. People who think the Vatican is some sort of an autocracy doesn't know much about Catholicism at all.

    Many a times I have heard such remarks, and responded, "You must be confusing us with the Mormons. The Pope is not a Mormon 'prophet' - he can't just change the enduring dogma, because he feels like it or feels pressured by the rest of society."

    Indeed there were times - many times - I and other faithful Catholics wished Pope John Paul II or Pope Benedict XVI would restore discipline and remove or censure errant bishops, priests, dioceses, parishes, orders, etc. but were unable or unwilling to do so likely due to significant constraints they have on their powers.

    The Church is a church of sinners, with all that entails.

    For the same reason, leftists who got all excited at certain public pronouncements of Pope Francis are very much likely to be disappointed.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey iffen,

    Gotta admit - it is very convenient. Just gotta trust the comm line is indeed working.

    If I remember correctly, the pope serves a similar (though not completely analogous) function in Catholicism.

    Peace.

    If I remember correctly, the pope serves a similar (though not completely analogous) function in Catholicism.

    You are misinformed. The Catholic Church does not have a new revelation every time it is politically expedient. It is that very enduring and permanent quality – regarding morality and doctrine – that attracted me to Catholicism.

    The Church is also not as hierarchical or monolithic as the Mormon governing structure; it tolerates much disobedience and dissession amongst its priests and flock. To be sure, clericalism exists, but there is a constant reminder that the Church is the whole body of believers, not just the clerical establishment.

    I should note that, in my personal experience, Mormons as individuals and families are generally wonderful, moral, and communal people. They make great neighbors and friends, provided of course that they are not the majority and dominate the politics of the shared community. In the latter case, they tend to impose their puritanical streaks* on others who do not share them, as well as behave in an exclusionary manner to outsiders.

    *The Catholic Church is sometimes accused of having a similar streak today because it opposes things like homosexual marriage and such, but I would simply point to Bishop Barron’s reflection on this in response: http://www.wordonfire.org/resources/article/sex-love-and-god-the-catholic-answer-to-puritanism-and-nietzcheanism/455/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Twinkie,

    Yeah, I didn't mean the 'new revelation' stuff, I know the pope is not a prophet. I was talking more in a central hierarchy for deliberation and final verdicts and such.

    It is that very enduring and permanent quality – regarding morality and doctrine – that attracted me to Catholicism.
     
    My own spiritual teacher speaks highly of Catholicism, he remembers fondly attending a Catholic school in Pakistan.

    And thanks for the other clarifications on Catholicism and that excellent article - reminds me a lot of the Islamic position on this subject actually. It's funny, a couple of centuries ago, we were cast in the Orientalist writings as the hedonistic, erotically-charged culture (especially by the Victorians) and now we are accused of being at the opposite end of the spectrum. My, how times change... :)

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    We die of alcoholism and heart disease.

    To which we can now add meth and opioid addictions.

    I feel the greatest sense of kinship with the Scotch-Irish in America

    I told you about the 1st and 2nd generation Korean War Bride descendants that I have known. I have to work at it to be more redneck than some of them.

    That Tidewater accent extends in a belt along the coast and west through the plantation South well into Mississippi. “True” Appalachians have always been separated from these Bourbons by speech, religion (think Baptist as opposed to Episcopalian) and social class. It is just like plebes, patricians and proles. If Al “Lockbox” Gore could have disguised his inherent patrician qualities better he could have been President like Bill Clinton. Clinton came by his plebian status by birthright and was in close enough contact with white trash proles that he knew how to pick up their votes as well (the few that bother to vote).

    Al Gore’s “inherent patrician qualities” are an illusion. He was the son of a schoolteacher father and the daughter of a man who ran a country store in Tennessee. When the father, skilled at politics, became a Tennessee senator the family lived at the Fairfax Hotel on Embassy Row in Washington and Al was sent to St Alban’s, the prestigious school by the National Cathedral. He added a veneer of sophistication, but he was a backcountry boy nevertheless. Bill (Clinton) Blythe
    was from the same backcountry background, just a little trashier.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    He was the son of a schoolteacher father and the daughter of a man who ran a country store in Tennessee.

    Part of the educated elite and merchant class.

    Passes for patrician in a state split between hillbillies and sharecroppers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Razib, ,

    Will you delete my comment #32? Except for the thanks to the link the rest of the 1st paragraph is pretty much unfounded as it relates to this paper, which is excellent, BTW.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    Mormonism seems like a giant pyramid scheme. Joseph Smith as 19th century L Ron Hubbard.

    Full disclosure, one of my ancestors moved from Maine to Illinois in the 1840s because a Mormon Missionary healed a dying woman by prayer and laying of hands. According to her daughter, doctors had given up on her, but after the faith-healing, she rose, dressed herself and walked one-half mile to the river, where she was baptized. Most of her children embraced the new faith. Her husband, however, quipped “That sure beats doctor bills,” but never joined the church. Indeed, when the Mormons left for Utah, the wife and some kids went with them, but the husband and other children stayed in Illinois. Some apparently witnessed a miracle, and others had not.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    Looked at from a practical point of view, I think that the beauty and simplicity of having a current prophet on hand is overwhelming. God can just send along any required updates to the religion to the current prophet without all the fuss and uproar that comes with having to establish the credentials and following for a new prophet. :)

    Hey iffen,

    Gotta admit – it is very convenient. Just gotta trust the comm line is indeed working.

    If I remember correctly, the pope serves a similar (though not completely analogous) function in Catholicism.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    If I remember correctly, the pope serves a similar (though not completely analogous) function in Catholicism.
     
    You are misinformed. The Catholic Church does not have a new revelation every time it is politically expedient. It is that very enduring and permanent quality - regarding morality and doctrine - that attracted me to Catholicism.

    The Church is also not as hierarchical or monolithic as the Mormon governing structure; it tolerates much disobedience and dissession amongst its priests and flock. To be sure, clericalism exists, but there is a constant reminder that the Church is the whole body of believers, not just the clerical establishment.

    I should note that, in my personal experience, Mormons as individuals and families are generally wonderful, moral, and communal people. They make great neighbors and friends, provided of course that they are not the majority and dominate the politics of the shared community. In the latter case, they tend to impose their puritanical streaks* on others who do not share them, as well as behave in an exclusionary manner to outsiders.

    *The Catholic Church is sometimes accused of having a similar streak today because it opposes things like homosexual marriage and such, but I would simply point to Bishop Barron's reflection on this in response: http://www.wordonfire.org/resources/article/sex-love-and-god-the-catholic-answer-to-puritanism-and-nietzcheanism/455/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha

    Mormons do not accept the Protestant contention that salvation is through faith alone. Behavior matters.
     
    Aaah! I remember the Mormons in my highschool - good folks. I mean, they used to jibe us with name calling like 'wetbacks' - actually 'wetters' was their term of choice. But it was all harmless fun, we used to poke fun at them being bland White folks - but we all did OK together on the basketball court or mixing it up in street hockey. A practicing Muslim fit in pretty well with those guys and many of them set the gold standard for academics/sports with their solid determination and ethical behavior. Of course, they had their black sheep - who doesn't?

    Good times...and good post on the breakdown of how Mormons fit in the greater milieu of the descendants of the British Isles.

    Peace


    (they do not believe Mormons are Christian, and resent that they claim that they are Christian)
     
    Ahmadiyyah!

    Looked at from a practical point of view, I think that the beauty and simplicity of having a current prophet on hand is overwhelming. God can just send along any required updates to the religion to the current prophet without all the fuss and uproar that comes with having to establish the credentials and following for a new prophet. :)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey iffen,

    Gotta admit - it is very convenient. Just gotta trust the comm line is indeed working.

    If I remember correctly, the pope serves a similar (though not completely analogous) function in Catholicism.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @PD Shaw
    By at least one account, 13,887 joined joined the Mormon Church in England btw/ 1840 and 1845, with 3,200 immigrating to Illinois during that period. Nauvoo became the largest city in Illinois by 1845 with a population of 11,052.

    A number of the immigrants had been led to believe that oranges and other citrus fruits grew in the streets of the city, and gold and silver could be had for the asking. The New Jerusalem did not meet expectations and didn't have a place for all the converts coming from New England, Canada and Britain; some died of privation, others left, denying they'd ever been duped, but most stayed within a day's traveling distance of Nauvoo. Some of those in need resorted to steeling for which the theocratic city state offered little protection to nonbelievers, but many worked for cheap wages in the surrounding communities and were reported to be hard workers by locals.

    Mormonism seems like a giant pyramid scheme. Joseph Smith as 19th century L Ron Hubbard.

    Read More
    • Replies: @PD Shaw
    Full disclosure, one of my ancestors moved from Maine to Illinois in the 1840s because a Mormon Missionary healed a dying woman by prayer and laying of hands. According to her daughter, doctors had given up on her, but after the faith-healing, she rose, dressed herself and walked one-half mile to the river, where she was baptized. Most of her children embraced the new faith. Her husband, however, quipped "That sure beats doctor bills," but never joined the church. Indeed, when the Mormons left for Utah, the wife and some kids went with them, but the husband and other children stayed in Illinois. Some apparently witnessed a miracle, and others had not.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Clark
    Razib, I think it got mentioned in your original post, but the one problem with your theory is that most of the English in Utah came during a huge wave of immigration in the second half of the 19th century from Mormon missionary efforts there. There was also a relatively large wave of immigration of Scandinavians. (There's actually one town primarily settled by Icelanders) Even before the move to Utah a large percentage of Mormons were European. This tends to undercut somewhat the puritan thesis even though many of the leaders of Mormonism do come out of the New England culture. In particular Brigham Young is very much the ideal of a pragmatic yankee. While early Mormonism definitely had a lot of early Yankee converts many if not most of these didn't stay with the movement.

    The thesis about Puritanism might have certain elements, but if they are there I think they're a bit more indirect. Early Mormonism is much more driven by converts from the more Arminian tradition rather than the Calvinist tradition. (A large conversion of Cambellites who largely followed Wesley's type of Arminianism set the tone for early Mormonism prior to the move to Illinois)

    Mormonism always had an uncomfortable relationship with the south. When they moved to Missouri they were persecuted largely due to being seen as abolitionists. (This was just a few years after a major slave rebellion) Mormon missionaries were often extremely persecuted in the south and sometimes lynched. There was a perception that southerners were in part behind the murder of Joseph Smith as well. This eventually led, during the Utah War period, to the Mountain Meadows Massacre. (The settlers heading to California were from Arkansas and just a few months earlier a Mormon apostle had been murdered in Arkansas) While in the Utah period, partially due to immigrants from the south, the tended to have a position not nearly as abolitionist as before those elements did remain in some ways. (I suspect part of this was due to Republican opposition to Mormons as well - there were political calls of eliminating the twin relics of barbarism of slavery and Mormonism)

    The thesis about Puritanism might have certain elements, but if they are there I think they’re a bit more indirect. Early Mormonism is much more driven by converts from the more Arminian tradition rather than the Calvinist tradition. (A large conversion of Cambellites who largely followed Wesley’s type of Arminianism set the tone for early Mormonism prior to the move to Illinois)

    i’m to understand that joseph smith himself flirted with the ‘universalist’ movement.

    i am aware that mormons are not calvinists. but when i say ‘puritan’ i don’t mean a theological position. after all, most unitarian-universalist churches in new england used to be congregationalist churches, and the transcendalists came out of the puritan milieu. rather, my assertion is that early mormonism can be understood as an extension of a yankee ethos, which can be seen in many of the movements from the burnedover district.

    second, yes, i’m aware of the conversions in england (and also large #s of migrants from scandinavia) to the early church in part because of you. but it seems likely that they would attract the sort of people who reinforce, rather than diminish, the ethos of the early church.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Mormons do not accept the Protestant contention that salvation is through faith alone. Behavior matters.

    Aaah! I remember the Mormons in my highschool – good folks. I mean, they used to jibe us with name calling like ‘wetbacks’ – actually ‘wetters’ was their term of choice. But it was all harmless fun, we used to poke fun at them being bland White folks – but we all did OK together on the basketball court or mixing it up in street hockey. A practicing Muslim fit in pretty well with those guys and many of them set the gold standard for academics/sports with their solid determination and ethical behavior. Of course, they had their black sheep – who doesn’t?

    Good times…and good post on the breakdown of how Mormons fit in the greater milieu of the descendants of the British Isles.

    Peace

    (they do not believe Mormons are Christian, and resent that they claim that they are Christian)

    Ahmadiyyah!

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Looked at from a practical point of view, I think that the beauty and simplicity of having a current prophet on hand is overwhelming. God can just send along any required updates to the religion to the current prophet without all the fuss and uproar that comes with having to establish the credentials and following for a new prophet. :)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Marcus
    Thousands of Mormon converts from northern England and Scotland moved to Illinois in the mid 1800s. They're trying to do the same thing now by converting and inviting Latinos, Pacific Islanders, etc.

    By at least one account, 13,887 joined joined the Mormon Church in England btw/ 1840 and 1845, with 3,200 immigrating to Illinois during that period. Nauvoo became the largest city in Illinois by 1845 with a population of 11,052.

    A number of the immigrants had been led to believe that oranges and other citrus fruits grew in the streets of the city, and gold and silver could be had for the asking. The New Jerusalem did not meet expectations and didn’t have a place for all the converts coming from New England, Canada and Britain; some died of privation, others left, denying they’d ever been duped, but most stayed within a day’s traveling distance of Nauvoo. Some of those in need resorted to steeling for which the theocratic city state offered little protection to nonbelievers, but many worked for cheap wages in the surrounding communities and were reported to be hard workers by locals.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    Mormonism seems like a giant pyramid scheme. Joseph Smith as 19th century L Ron Hubbard.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Razib, I think it got mentioned in your original post, but the one problem with your theory is that most of the English in Utah came during a huge wave of immigration in the second half of the 19th century from Mormon missionary efforts there. There was also a relatively large wave of immigration of Scandinavians. (There’s actually one town primarily settled by Icelanders) Even before the move to Utah a large percentage of Mormons were European. This tends to undercut somewhat the puritan thesis even though many of the leaders of Mormonism do come out of the New England culture. In particular Brigham Young is very much the ideal of a pragmatic yankee. While early Mormonism definitely had a lot of early Yankee converts many if not most of these didn’t stay with the movement.

    The thesis about Puritanism might have certain elements, but if they are there I think they’re a bit more indirect. Early Mormonism is much more driven by converts from the more Arminian tradition rather than the Calvinist tradition. (A large conversion of Cambellites who largely followed Wesley’s type of Arminianism set the tone for early Mormonism prior to the move to Illinois)

    Mormonism always had an uncomfortable relationship with the south. When they moved to Missouri they were persecuted largely due to being seen as abolitionists. (This was just a few years after a major slave rebellion) Mormon missionaries were often extremely persecuted in the south and sometimes lynched. There was a perception that southerners were in part behind the murder of Joseph Smith as well. This eventually led, during the Utah War period, to the Mountain Meadows Massacre. (The settlers heading to California were from Arkansas and just a few months earlier a Mormon apostle had been murdered in Arkansas) While in the Utah period, partially due to immigrants from the south, the tended to have a position not nearly as abolitionist as before those elements did remain in some ways. (I suspect part of this was due to Republican opposition to Mormons as well – there were political calls of eliminating the twin relics of barbarism of slavery and Mormonism)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Razib Khan
    The thesis about Puritanism might have certain elements, but if they are there I think they’re a bit more indirect. Early Mormonism is much more driven by converts from the more Arminian tradition rather than the Calvinist tradition. (A large conversion of Cambellites who largely followed Wesley’s type of Arminianism set the tone for early Mormonism prior to the move to Illinois)



    i'm to understand that joseph smith himself flirted with the 'universalist' movement.

    i am aware that mormons are not calvinists. but when i say 'puritan' i don't mean a theological position. after all, most unitarian-universalist churches in new england used to be congregationalist churches, and the transcendalists came out of the puritan milieu. rather, my assertion is that early mormonism can be understood as an extension of a yankee ethos, which can be seen in many of the movements from the burnedover district.

    second, yes, i'm aware of the conversions in england (and also large #s of migrants from scandinavia) to the early church in part because of you. but it seems likely that they would attract the sort of people who reinforce, rather than diminish, the ethos of the early church.
    , @kikz2
    "Mormonism always had an uncomfortable relationship with the south."


    y, the no caffeine thing is just alien to us.. no tea? no coca-cola? magic underwear? mmmmm. no thank ya :)

    additionally, we don't take lightly to their efforts to seal our dead in wedded bliss to one of their mouldering elders.

    our 20+yr neighbors across the street, tried that w/that w/my paternal grandmother.. my daddy politely told their 'prozac-ish' matriarch to go to hell... :)

    p.s. i've been 'kikz' since the early 90's.. no disrespect, just fact. :)
    , @Hail
    What you describe is a legitimate ethnogenesis.

    The Mormon Ethnogensis.

    Where does an "ethnicity" come from? They don't just descend from heaven, fully formed, right? So they are born. How are they born; how do they emerge? The Mormon case is actually a great example, albeit unique in certain ways. It is most useful to see the Mormons as a new ethnicity, drawing in part from previous ones (where else does one draw from?), but really its own thing.

    Ethnicity, of course, is and remains tied in tightly with religion, and probably always has been.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    I've done some digging around Mormon family genealogies and keep being surprised at how often Mormons descend from immigrants who came from England in the late 1800s. It seems there are plenty of Mormons who aren't old-stock American at all.

    Thousands of Mormon converts from northern England and Scotland moved to Illinois in the mid 1800s. They’re trying to do the same thing now by converting and inviting Latinos, Pacific Islanders, etc.

    Read More
    • Replies: @PD Shaw
    By at least one account, 13,887 joined joined the Mormon Church in England btw/ 1840 and 1845, with 3,200 immigrating to Illinois during that period. Nauvoo became the largest city in Illinois by 1845 with a population of 11,052.

    A number of the immigrants had been led to believe that oranges and other citrus fruits grew in the streets of the city, and gold and silver could be had for the asking. The New Jerusalem did not meet expectations and didn't have a place for all the converts coming from New England, Canada and Britain; some died of privation, others left, denying they'd ever been duped, but most stayed within a day's traveling distance of Nauvoo. Some of those in need resorted to steeling for which the theocratic city state offered little protection to nonbelievers, but many worked for cheap wages in the surrounding communities and were reported to be hard workers by locals.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Razib Khan
    cotton gin + rise of a universalist white consciousness in the south (and to some extent the whole USA) during age of jackson.

    cotton gin + rise of a universalist white consciousness in the south (and to some extent the whole USA) during age of jackson.

    Two things that the nouveau riche slave owners of the cotton revolution took care of immediately was to identify themselves as a planter as opposed to yeoman farmer and they imported educated New Englanders who lived in the household and taught the children, male and female.

    While Arkansas hardly had any public schools, Michigan had hundreds.

    The Cavaliers and Bourbons had no use for educated cotton pickers and saw-mill hands, but the Scotch-Irish disregarded, and to some extent still do, the benefits of public education to a larger society. This is greatly distorted by the racial divide. Can the lack of support for public education be separated on the bases of Bourbon hostility, traditional Scotch-Irish individualism and historical racial animosity?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twinkie

    Well, we own it, and have for some time, so deal with it.
     
    I am from East Asia, but I feel the greatest sense of kinship with the Scotch-Irish in America, even more so than with my wife's people, the ever genteel, productive Yankee-German-Scandinavian folk of the Midwest.

    I love their music, I love their martial spirit, I love their grit and humor.* I love their sense of personal and familiar honor, which seems to have been sapped out of the rest of mercantile whites in this country. I even "get" their religion, having been a staunch Calvinist earlier in my life.

    *I started watching a TV series called "Quarry" recently, and there is a character who says something I think perfectly captures the Scotch-Irish grit and humor. The character is not necessarily Scotch-Irish, but she may as well be. While stitching up her wounded son who whines about the pain, she says "Our people don't die of gunshot wounds. We die of alcoholism and heart disease."

    We die of alcoholism and heart disease.

    To which we can now add meth and opioid addictions.

    I feel the greatest sense of kinship with the Scotch-Irish in America

    I told you about the 1st and 2nd generation Korean War Bride descendants that I have known. I have to work at it to be more redneck than some of them.

    That Tidewater accent extends in a belt along the coast and west through the plantation South well into Mississippi. “True” Appalachians have always been separated from these Bourbons by speech, religion (think Baptist as opposed to Episcopalian) and social class. It is just like plebes, patricians and proles. If Al “Lockbox” Gore could have disguised his inherent patrician qualities better he could have been President like Bill Clinton. Clinton came by his plebian status by birthright and was in close enough contact with white trash proles that he knew how to pick up their votes as well (the few that bother to vote).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Uncle Remus
    Al Gore's "inherent patrician qualities" are an illusion. He was the son of a schoolteacher father and the daughter of a man who ran a country store in Tennessee. When the father, skilled at politics, became a Tennessee senator the family lived at the Fairfax Hotel on Embassy Row in Washington and Al was sent to St Alban's, the prestigious school by the National Cathedral. He added a veneer of sophistication, but he was a backcountry boy nevertheless. Bill (Clinton) Blythe
    was from the same backcountry background, just a little trashier.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    I've done some digging around Mormon family genealogies and keep being surprised at how often Mormons descend from immigrants who came from England in the late 1800s. It seems there are plenty of Mormons who aren't old-stock American at all.

    Seems to be the case in Mitt Romney’s family too, his great-great-grandfather was from Preston in Lancashire:

    http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-18422949

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hail

    Seems to be the case in Mitt Romney’s family too, his great-great-grandfather was from Preston in Lancashire:
     
    I'd like to direct people here to what I believe to be the fullest and most comprehensive account of Mitt Romney's ancestry, back four and more generations (compiled and written by me in 2012). Respectfully submitted for your consideration:

    Synopsis off Mitt Romney’s Ancestry

    (1) Most of Mitt Romney's ancestral stock consists of early converts to Mormonism from Britain (most from Northwest-England and Scotland) who were impelled to the USA from the 1830s to the 1850s, settling directly in Mormon communities.

    (2) Colonial-Yankees account for 27% of Romney’s ancestral stock.

    (3) 12.5% (one-eighth) of his ancestral stock comes from Northern-Germany.

    (4) Many of Romney’s ancestors who were then-living participated in the dramatic 1846-7 Mormon Exodus from Illinois to Utah.

    (5) All of Romney’s ancestral lines end up in Utah by the 1880s.

    (6) Some went to Mexico at the end of the 1800s, but were expelled in 1912 and went back to Utah.

    — — —

    Mitt Romney: Ethnic Ancestry Summary
    40.6% England — Mostly Northwest England, partly W.Midlands.
    18.8% Scotland
    26.6% Colonial-Yankee
    12.5% North-German
    1.5-3% French, Acadian, possible Huguenot (see entries #5 and #7 below)
    __________________
     
    (The full accounts of each of Mitt Romney's eight ancestral lines)

    We see much more British ancestry (converts to Mormonism in Britain who emigrated to join the Elect), including Scottish, than actual Colonial Yankee ancestry... The disproportionately-important patrlineal line itself is also very firmly English, out of Northumberland, NW England.

    Mitt Romney is one man, but I believe his "ancestral portrait" is representative; his overall ancestral portrait does not quite support the theory seemingly here proposed that Mormonism is a direct descendant (ethnically as well as culturally) of Yankeeism.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Razib Khan
    http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4049&context=etd

    Thanks for the link to the paper. I will have to complete it later, it looks very interesting. I find it quite telling that interspersed with scholarly writing there are all these little moral messages. Many, many inoculations against charges of racial insensitivity. It appears that one cannot just write history anymore; you have project everything back and keep repeating, “We don’t think like that anymore.”

    I just didn’t understand the point about Carolina planters, some few that came from Barbados, but the original ones that built the rice and indigo and Sea Island cotton plantations were mostly English.

    Alexandre Pétion of Haiti gave Simon Bolivar a substantial assist with men and material at a crucial and trying time in Bolivar’s struggle.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @sansfoy
    The Mormons who followed Brigham Young out to Utah were only about 2/3 of the Mormon community at the time of Joseph Smith's death. Of these Brighamite Mormons, roughly 50% were European converts, mostly English and Scottish, but also Danish, Swedish, etc. These followed Brigham Young at a higher rate than the American-born Mormons because they'd largely been converted by members of the Quorum of the Twelve, which took over leadership of the Utah branch after Smith's death. There were other claimants, of course.

    My point in all of this is that a big chunk of that self-reported English ancestry dates to mid-19th century converts to Mormonism in the British Isles. Like in most of the American population, the English part of the balance is probably under-reported due a greater knowledge of more recent immigrant ancestors.

    In my own ancestry, I'm about 50% descended from early Puritan stock, and 50% from these later Mormon converts, with a roughly equal mix of Scottish, English, and Scandinavian. I do not self-identify as a Mormon anymore, but almost everyone in my extended family still does.

    I’ve done some digging around Mormon family genealogies and keep being surprised at how often Mormons descend from immigrants who came from England in the late 1800s. It seems there are plenty of Mormons who aren’t old-stock American at all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @German_reader
    Seems to be the case in Mitt Romney's family too, his great-great-grandfather was from Preston in Lancashire:
    http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-18422949
    , @Marcus
    Thousands of Mormon converts from northern England and Scotland moved to Illinois in the mid 1800s. They're trying to do the same thing now by converting and inviting Latinos, Pacific Islanders, etc.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twinkie

    Right, some of eastern Oregon has a Southern feel to it.
     
    Once I asked a local in Western Washington what the difference was between Washingtonians and Oregonians. His answer? "We like Asians in Washington. They don't in Oregon."

    Well, to be fair, Washington had its share of anti-Asian riots. But it wasn’t really so much about straight up racism as it was the labor disputes so common to that time. For example, the Sikh lumber mill workers who were kicked out of Bellingham were described in magnificent terms (i.e. physically attractive and regal) by the locals, but that just made them all the more determined to chase them out to avoid competition.

    The lesson there I think is not to hector whites about racism (the current policy), but rather to keep their standard of living above the level of Eastern Europe, which is about where it seems a lot of “progressives” think it belongs.

    White people are human beings just like everyone else. When they have their backs up against the wall, they act just the same as others do. Having had a near miss with a Chinese anti-white riot (caused by 1999 bombing of Chinese embassy in Belgrade — random whites were actually being attacked in the streets of Beijing and Chengdu), I sympathize with victims, but I’m also well aware that whites have no monopoly on racial violence.

    It’s interesting that you have an affinity for Scots Irish. Are you Korean? If so, that would make sense, because Presbyterians had great success with their missions in Korea.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Razib Khan
    oregon was historically more racist overall. black musicians who played in portland had to stay in hotels across the river in vacounver, WA. black musicians going by train from seattle to california also had to accept that they wouldn't get lodgings overnight if they stopped in oregon.

    Some black people settled in Washington Territory for exactly that reason. Centralia, Washington (about halfway between Tacoma and Portland) was founded by a black man named George Washington who had come west on the Oregon Trail but could not own land in the Oregon Territory. I have also read that the KKK was particularly strong in Oregon during the 1920s.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twinkie

    Right, some of eastern Oregon has a Southern feel to it.
     
    Once I asked a local in Western Washington what the difference was between Washingtonians and Oregonians. His answer? "We like Asians in Washington. They don't in Oregon."

    oregon was historically more racist overall. black musicians who played in portland had to stay in hotels across the river in vacounver, WA. black musicians going by train from seattle to california also had to accept that they wouldn’t get lodgings overnight if they stopped in oregon.

    Read More
    • Replies: @patrick
    Some black people settled in Washington Territory for exactly that reason. Centralia, Washington (about halfway between Tacoma and Portland) was founded by a black man named George Washington who had come west on the Oregon Trail but could not own land in the Oregon Territory. I have also read that the KKK was particularly strong in Oregon during the 1920s.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Bill P
    Right, some of eastern Oregon has a Southern feel to it. The ranching country in particular. But as I recall it's very sparsely populated. One of the curious things about the Pacific NW is that despite its remote location it was directly influenced by British before Americans settled there in large numbers. This, I guess, is why you find the large percentage of people claiming English ancestry in the part of Washington immediately south of Vancouver Island. There are mixed English and Spanish names all up and down Puget Sound. I live near Mt. Baker (one of Captain Vancouver's shipmates), which is clearly visible from the San Juan Islands, for example. A little further north and you have mixed English and Russian names.

    But in Seattle proper, where I grew up, the early Republican influence is obvious. There's Union and Republican streets, McLellan street (Scots Irish Union general BTW), Fremont Ave. and the entire neighborhood of Fremont, Lake Union, Union Bay, Lincoln Park and certainly some others I don't even know about. Also, the Union Civil War veterans' plot in Lakeview Cemetery is very impressive. A Confederates' plot exists as well, but it is very humble - even a little sad - in comparison.

    Right, some of eastern Oregon has a Southern feel to it.

    Once I asked a local in Western Washington what the difference was between Washingtonians and Oregonians. His answer? “We like Asians in Washington. They don’t in Oregon.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Razib Khan
    oregon was historically more racist overall. black musicians who played in portland had to stay in hotels across the river in vacounver, WA. black musicians going by train from seattle to california also had to accept that they wouldn't get lodgings overnight if they stopped in oregon.
    , @Bill P
    Well, to be fair, Washington had its share of anti-Asian riots. But it wasn't really so much about straight up racism as it was the labor disputes so common to that time. For example, the Sikh lumber mill workers who were kicked out of Bellingham were described in magnificent terms (i.e. physically attractive and regal) by the locals, but that just made them all the more determined to chase them out to avoid competition.

    The lesson there I think is not to hector whites about racism (the current policy), but rather to keep their standard of living above the level of Eastern Europe, which is about where it seems a lot of "progressives" think it belongs.

    White people are human beings just like everyone else. When they have their backs up against the wall, they act just the same as others do. Having had a near miss with a Chinese anti-white riot (caused by 1999 bombing of Chinese embassy in Belgrade -- random whites were actually being attacked in the streets of Beijing and Chengdu), I sympathize with victims, but I'm also well aware that whites have no monopoly on racial violence.

    It's interesting that you have an affinity for Scots Irish. Are you Korean? If so, that would make sense, because Presbyterians had great success with their missions in Korea.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twinkie

    The current Mormon alliance is mainly with the Scots-Irish and the Deep South, as Tidewater is disappearing.
     
    The cultural and linguistic obliteration of Tidewater is deeply sad to me, in part because my older children* grew up and learned to speak as babies there. They still have more than a trace of this accent: https://youtu.be/1RzVKCWXrRA

    It was, I suppose, inevitable given the outsized economic roles that military bases and federal facilities have played in the big cities of the region. They brought a great deal of diversity and the monolithic national-popular culture that just overwhelmed what remained of the local flavor in the cities.

    Still, there are small towns and rural villages in the Tidewater area that retain the older local culture, including the dialect. One of my hunting buddies is from the area - his family has been there for over 200 years and still owns some bits of land (the Civil War and its aftermath destroyed much of the Cavalier society and prosperity, and eminent domain put the final nail in the conffin). One still sees occasional small cotton fields in Tidewater!

    *My younger children can shift at will between a mild Mid-Atlanic accent and Appalachian, reflecting the two residences in which they have grown. So we have quite a bit of linguistic diversity in my family (I speak with a mix of New England/New York accents and my wife speaks Standard Midwestern). Together as a family we culturally identify as Southerners, but my children will knock their mother and me for being carpetbaggers whilst they are, of course, the native-born of Dixie.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    The entirety of the South’s cultural distinctiveness cannot be explained away by pointing to this very small minority of people.

    Well, we own it, and have for some time, so deal with it.

    Well, we own it, and have for some time, so deal with it.

    I am from East Asia, but I feel the greatest sense of kinship with the Scotch-Irish in America, even more so than with my wife’s people, the ever genteel, productive Yankee-German-Scandinavian folk of the Midwest.

    I love their music, I love their martial spirit, I love their grit and humor.* I love their sense of personal and familiar honor, which seems to have been sapped out of the rest of mercantile whites in this country. I even “get” their religion, having been a staunch Calvinist earlier in my life.

    *I started watching a TV series called “Quarry” recently, and there is a character who says something I think perfectly captures the Scotch-Irish grit and humor. The character is not necessarily Scotch-Irish, but she may as well be. While stitching up her wounded son who whines about the pain, she says “Our people don’t die of gunshot wounds. We die of alcoholism and heart disease.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    We die of alcoholism and heart disease.

    To which we can now add meth and opioid addictions.

    I feel the greatest sense of kinship with the Scotch-Irish in America

    I told you about the 1st and 2nd generation Korean War Bride descendants that I have known. I have to work at it to be more redneck than some of them.

    That Tidewater accent extends in a belt along the coast and west through the plantation South well into Mississippi. “True” Appalachians have always been separated from these Bourbons by speech, religion (think Baptist as opposed to Episcopalian) and social class. It is just like plebes, patricians and proles. If Al “Lockbox” Gore could have disguised his inherent patrician qualities better he could have been President like Bill Clinton. Clinton came by his plebian status by birthright and was in close enough contact with white trash proles that he knew how to pick up their votes as well (the few that bother to vote).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Yudi
    The Cavalier culture is not *currently* capturing the national imagination, because it has been in decline for decades, as Woodard pointed out in his book. It was once a very important component of the national culture--Southerners used to be proud to point out that national heroes like Washington and Jefferson were slaveholding planters, whereas today those facts are unpleasant and swept under the rug.

    However, there is a third Southern subculture that Fischer does not discuss in Albion's Seed, namely the Deep South (probably because a) the Carolina planters came from elsewhere in the New World, not a region of Britain; and b) because he presumably wanted to keep the book under a thousand pages). Woodard does talk about them, however, and they do still loom large in the national imagination, viz. Dylan Roof.

    The current Mormon alliance is mainly with the Scots-Irish and the Deep South, as Tidewater is disappearing.

    The current Mormon alliance is mainly with the Scots-Irish and the Deep South, as Tidewater is disappearing.

    The cultural and linguistic obliteration of Tidewater is deeply sad to me, in part because my older children* grew up and learned to speak as babies there. They still have more than a trace of this accent:

    It was, I suppose, inevitable given the outsized economic roles that military bases and federal facilities have played in the big cities of the region. They brought a great deal of diversity and the monolithic national-popular culture that just overwhelmed what remained of the local flavor in the cities.

    Still, there are small towns and rural villages in the Tidewater area that retain the older local culture, including the dialect. One of my hunting buddies is from the area – his family has been there for over 200 years and still owns some bits of land (the Civil War and its aftermath destroyed much of the Cavalier society and prosperity, and eminent domain put the final nail in the conffin). One still sees occasional small cotton fields in Tidewater!

    *My younger children can shift at will between a mild Mid-Atlanic accent and Appalachian, reflecting the two residences in which they have grown. So we have quite a bit of linguistic diversity in my family (I speak with a mix of New England/New York accents and my wife speaks Standard Midwestern). Together as a family we culturally identify as Southerners, but my children will knock their mother and me for being carpetbaggers whilst they are, of course, the native-born of Dixie.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Razib Khan
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXs9cf2YWwg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Razib Khan
    well, some areas of oregon were settled by people from the south, so i don't know. but yes, there is prejudice against southern people from what i've seen, though that happens in much of the urban west.

    but there's a reason the cities are named 'portland' and 'salem.'

    Right, some of eastern Oregon has a Southern feel to it. The ranching country in particular. But as I recall it’s very sparsely populated. One of the curious things about the Pacific NW is that despite its remote location it was directly influenced by British before Americans settled there in large numbers. This, I guess, is why you find the large percentage of people claiming English ancestry in the part of Washington immediately south of Vancouver Island. There are mixed English and Spanish names all up and down Puget Sound. I live near Mt. Baker (one of Captain Vancouver’s shipmates), which is clearly visible from the San Juan Islands, for example. A little further north and you have mixed English and Russian names.

    But in Seattle proper, where I grew up, the early Republican influence is obvious. There’s Union and Republican streets, McLellan street (Scots Irish Union general BTW), Fremont Ave. and the entire neighborhood of Fremont, Lake Union, Union Bay, Lincoln Park and certainly some others I don’t even know about. Also, the Union Civil War veterans’ plot in Lakeview Cemetery is very impressive. A Confederates’ plot exists as well, but it is very humble – even a little sad – in comparison.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    Right, some of eastern Oregon has a Southern feel to it.
     
    Once I asked a local in Western Washington what the difference was between Washingtonians and Oregonians. His answer? "We like Asians in Washington. They don't in Oregon."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Bill P

    additionally, there is the fact that many anti-slavery people were as anti-black, or more so, than people that accepted the institution. e.g., my home state of oregon was founded explicitly as a non-slave white state.
     
    Ever read Sometimes a Great Notion? That attitude is captured very well in the descriptions of Oregon settlers' views concerning both blacks and Southerners. I've run into it up here in exurban/rural Western Washington as well -- even today. People are not so friendly toward blacks, and they're at least as hostile to white Southerners. They seem to think anyone with that accent is a degenerate or an imbecile.

    The very idea of slavery is offensive to them, and that leads to an animosity toward all involved. I think that was pretty much the standard sentiment of the average Republican voter in 1860.

    well, some areas of oregon were settled by people from the south, so i don’t know. but yes, there is prejudice against southern people from what i’ve seen, though that happens in much of the urban west.

    but there’s a reason the cities are named ‘portland’ and ‘salem.’

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill P
    Right, some of eastern Oregon has a Southern feel to it. The ranching country in particular. But as I recall it's very sparsely populated. One of the curious things about the Pacific NW is that despite its remote location it was directly influenced by British before Americans settled there in large numbers. This, I guess, is why you find the large percentage of people claiming English ancestry in the part of Washington immediately south of Vancouver Island. There are mixed English and Spanish names all up and down Puget Sound. I live near Mt. Baker (one of Captain Vancouver's shipmates), which is clearly visible from the San Juan Islands, for example. A little further north and you have mixed English and Russian names.

    But in Seattle proper, where I grew up, the early Republican influence is obvious. There's Union and Republican streets, McLellan street (Scots Irish Union general BTW), Fremont Ave. and the entire neighborhood of Fremont, Lake Union, Union Bay, Lincoln Park and certainly some others I don't even know about. Also, the Union Civil War veterans' plot in Lakeview Cemetery is very impressive. A Confederates' plot exists as well, but it is very humble - even a little sad - in comparison.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Razib Khan
    re: slavery & racism, people are trapped into a progressive model of history. the reality is from a modern perspective there was a 'recession' between 1800 and 1860, especially, in the south. then, there was a secondary recession between 1875 and the early 1900s.

    additionally, there is the fact that many anti-slavery people were as anti-black, or more so, than people that accepted the institution. e.g., my home state of oregon was founded explicitly as a non-slave white state.

    additionally, there is the fact that many anti-slavery people were as anti-black, or more so, than people that accepted the institution. e.g., my home state of oregon was founded explicitly as a non-slave white state.

    Ever read Sometimes a Great Notion? That attitude is captured very well in the descriptions of Oregon settlers’ views concerning both blacks and Southerners. I’ve run into it up here in exurban/rural Western Washington as well — even today. People are not so friendly toward blacks, and they’re at least as hostile to white Southerners. They seem to think anyone with that accent is a degenerate or an imbecile.

    The very idea of slavery is offensive to them, and that leads to an animosity toward all involved. I think that was pretty much the standard sentiment of the average Republican voter in 1860.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Razib Khan
    well, some areas of oregon were settled by people from the south, so i don't know. but yes, there is prejudice against southern people from what i've seen, though that happens in much of the urban west.

    but there's a reason the cities are named 'portland' and 'salem.'
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • re: slavery & racism, people are trapped into a progressive model of history. the reality is from a modern perspective there was a ‘recession’ between 1800 and 1860, especially, in the south. then, there was a secondary recession between 1875 and the early 1900s.

    additionally, there is the fact that many anti-slavery people were as anti-black, or more so, than people that accepted the institution. e.g., my home state of oregon was founded explicitly as a non-slave white state.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill P

    additionally, there is the fact that many anti-slavery people were as anti-black, or more so, than people that accepted the institution. e.g., my home state of oregon was founded explicitly as a non-slave white state.
     
    Ever read Sometimes a Great Notion? That attitude is captured very well in the descriptions of Oregon settlers' views concerning both blacks and Southerners. I've run into it up here in exurban/rural Western Washington as well -- even today. People are not so friendly toward blacks, and they're at least as hostile to white Southerners. They seem to think anyone with that accent is a degenerate or an imbecile.

    The very idea of slavery is offensive to them, and that leads to an animosity toward all involved. I think that was pretty much the standard sentiment of the average Republican voter in 1860.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I am always very skeptical of claims like this. The reading I’ve done demonstrates that all non-black groups in the South disliked slavery for a generation or two, but then became tolerant of it at the very least. More often they became enthusiastic supporters and practitioners of the institution. This includes the Native Americans living in that area.

    Yeah, that’s pretty much the case. Self-interest dictates politics. Scots Irish generals like Stonewall Jackson and Nathan Bedford Forrest had no problem with slavery because they personally profited from it. On the other hand, Northern Scots Irish like Ulysses Grant and Phil Sheridan had no use for the institution.

    The truth is that Scots Irish Presbyterianism as it existed circa 1776 was anti-slavery, but by 1860 Scots Irish were already assimilated enough that they took on the customs of their region. And who wouldn’t expect these people to raise the banner of war for its own sake?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hibernian
    Sheridan was an Irish Catholic, either an immigrant himself or the son of immigrants.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Yudi
    "A little known fact about Scots Irish is that they also tended to oppose slavery, on account of so many of their brethren having been shipped off in chains to colonial plantations, which may as well have been death camps."

    I am always very skeptical of claims like this. The reading I've done demonstrates that all non-black groups in the South disliked slavery for a generation or two, but then became tolerant of it at the very least. More often they became enthusiastic supporters and practitioners of the institution. This includes the Native Americans living in that area.

    Statements like this seek to put a satisfying modern interpretation on what our ancestors actually believed and did. Read James Oakes' The Ruling Race if you want more information: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0393317056/

    cotton gin + rise of a universalist white consciousness in the south (and to some extent the whole USA) during age of jackson.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    cotton gin + rise of a universalist white consciousness in the south (and to some extent the whole USA) during age of jackson.

    Two things that the nouveau riche slave owners of the cotton revolution took care of immediately was to identify themselves as a planter as opposed to yeoman farmer and they imported educated New Englanders who lived in the household and taught the children, male and female.

    While Arkansas hardly had any public schools, Michigan had hundreds.

    The Cavaliers and Bourbons had no use for educated cotton pickers and saw-mill hands, but the Scotch-Irish disregarded, and to some extent still do, the benefits of public education to a larger society. This is greatly distorted by the racial divide. Can the lack of support for public education be separated on the bases of Bourbon hostility, traditional Scotch-Irish individualism and historical racial animosity?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Bill P

    why are you telling me this? i’ve blogged this.
     
    Missed that one.

    no, not picts technically. probably the northern britons who were part of the kingdom of rheged and later became the rump of strathclyde (cumbria obviously cognate to cymru). the pictish lands were further north, and generally those areas never under roman domination.
     
    You're right, not technically Picts as in straight line from Picts to Scots Irish, but certainly they contributed to the people now known as Scots Irish (Edinburgh was a major Pictish center back in Roman times). "Scots Irish" as an ethnicity is as much a product of religion as ancestry/geography. If any man created a Scots Irish identity, it was John Knox. Ironically, they were as Calvinist as the Puritans, but obviously a very different people. I don't think their reputation as a bunch of louts is deserved. If anything, they were hated because they were so militant, and because of that people were scared of them.

    It's because they were such implacable warriors that they have a bad reputation today. But without them, there would be no United States of America. Not only were they the most solidly pro-independence of all colonial Americans, they were also eager and willing to lay down their lives for it. A little known fact about Scots Irish is that they also tended to oppose slavery, on account of so many of their brethren having been shipped off in chains to colonial plantations, which may as well have been death camps.

    “A little known fact about Scots Irish is that they also tended to oppose slavery, on account of so many of their brethren having been shipped off in chains to colonial plantations, which may as well have been death camps.”

    I am always very skeptical of claims like this. The reading I’ve done demonstrates that all non-black groups in the South disliked slavery for a generation or two, but then became tolerant of it at the very least. More often they became enthusiastic supporters and practitioners of the institution. This includes the Native Americans living in that area.

    Statements like this seek to put a satisfying modern interpretation on what our ancestors actually believed and did. Read James Oakes’ The Ruling Race if you want more information: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0393317056/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Razib Khan
    cotton gin + rise of a universalist white consciousness in the south (and to some extent the whole USA) during age of jackson.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Razib Khan
    The reason you don’t see many Southerners calling themselves “English” is because most of them would choose “American” or “Southern” as their ethnicity.

    why are you telling me this? i've blogged this.

    My pet theory is that the Scots Irish are actually descended from the north Brythonic speaking people, AKA the Picts. Many of their surnames, such as Knox, Wallace and Abercrombie strongly suggest this to be the case.

    no, not picts technically. probably the northern britons who were part of the kingdom of rheged and later became the rump of strathclyde (cumbria obviously cognate to cymru). the pictish lands were further north, and generally those areas never under roman domination.

    why are you telling me this? i’ve blogged this.

    Missed that one.

    no, not picts technically. probably the northern britons who were part of the kingdom of rheged and later became the rump of strathclyde (cumbria obviously cognate to cymru). the pictish lands were further north, and generally those areas never under roman domination.

    You’re right, not technically Picts as in straight line from Picts to Scots Irish, but certainly they contributed to the people now known as Scots Irish (Edinburgh was a major Pictish center back in Roman times). “Scots Irish” as an ethnicity is as much a product of religion as ancestry/geography. If any man created a Scots Irish identity, it was John Knox. Ironically, they were as Calvinist as the Puritans, but obviously a very different people. I don’t think their reputation as a bunch of louts is deserved. If anything, they were hated because they were so militant, and because of that people were scared of them.

    It’s because they were such implacable warriors that they have a bad reputation today. But without them, there would be no United States of America. Not only were they the most solidly pro-independence of all colonial Americans, they were also eager and willing to lay down their lives for it. A little known fact about Scots Irish is that they also tended to oppose slavery, on account of so many of their brethren having been shipped off in chains to colonial plantations, which may as well have been death camps.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yudi
    "A little known fact about Scots Irish is that they also tended to oppose slavery, on account of so many of their brethren having been shipped off in chains to colonial plantations, which may as well have been death camps."

    I am always very skeptical of claims like this. The reading I've done demonstrates that all non-black groups in the South disliked slavery for a generation or two, but then became tolerant of it at the very least. More often they became enthusiastic supporters and practitioners of the institution. This includes the Native Americans living in that area.

    Statements like this seek to put a satisfying modern interpretation on what our ancestors actually believed and did. Read James Oakes' The Ruling Race if you want more information: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0393317056/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Halvorson
    Your post here is mostly about Mormons, but I feel the need to push back against "the Southerners are Scotch-Irish" meme that Albion's Seed and this blog have made so popular. I was skeptical of this and so I dug through Fischer's sources looking for raw numbers and found this table, based on a surname study by Purvis:

    https://postimg.org/image/7nf370pbz/

    Southerners were only 15 percent Scotch Irish in 1790, at which point emigration from Ulster had ceased. This number is perfectly consistent with the genealogical digging I've done on Southern signers of the Declaration of Independence and Confederate generals with well documented pedigrees. The entirety of the South's cultural distinctiveness cannot be explained away by pointing to this very small minority of people.

    “I feel the need to push back against “the Southerners are Scotch-Irish” meme that Albion’s Seed and this blog have made so popular.”

    Perhaps repeating a point, but Albion’s Seed classified Scots-Irish with lowland Scots and Northern English, referring either to Northern British or Borderlanders.

    Second, looking at people who signed the Declaration of Independence and served as generals for the Confederacy is a poor sampling of Americans. These are elites. The Borderlanders mostly arrived btw/ 1765-1775, so they are not establishment figures.

    Third, the Borderlanders appear to have married younger, emigrated with more women than any group outside of New England, and had more children both in and out of wedlock, so the 1790 census may not adequately describe demographic impact.

    I think you are right that there appears to be a tendency to equate Southerners with the Scots-Irish, but Albion’s Seed has a quarter of its contents dedicated to the Distressed Cavaliers and their servants, which formed the base of the South. Fischer even has the temerity to identify African-Americans as Southerners in this sense (contributors and propagators). But the Northern British were more Western than Southern.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    has the temerity to identify African-Americans as Southerners

    Depending upon who you want to listen to they got the Scotch-Irish/Cavalier genes/culture.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Bill P
    I'm half Scots Irish, and none of my Scots Irish ancestry comes from south of Pennsylvania/Ohio, while some comes from as far north as New Hampshire and Vermont (New Englanders imported them to act as a buffer against the Indians). The reason you don't see many Southerners calling themselves "English" is because most of them would choose "American" or "Southern" as their ethnicity. But in fact the South is one of the most English parts of the country, both culturally and in terms of ancestry. They love tea, gardens, hunting with hounds, riding and literature. Names like Adams, Smith, Johnson and the like are more common there than in the rest of the country.

    As for the Scots Irish, after they pushed West past the Appalachians (which legions of them did in the early 19th century), most of them seem to have lost their Scots Irishness and settled into a comfortable "American" identity. In my family, for example, none of them even stayed with the Presbyterian Church. You'd never even guess they were Scots Irish unless you knew a lot about surnames. They were absorbed seamlessly into American institutions, the military being one of the most important, and when they emerged they were nothing like the caricature of the Scots Irish hillbilly. However, arguably their overrepresentation in the military does suggest a certain retention of their ancient martial tradition. My pet theory is that the Scots Irish are actually descended from the north Brythonic speaking people, AKA the Picts. Many of their surnames, such as Knox, Wallace and Abercrombie strongly suggest this to be the case.

    Lots of Mormons call themselves English because so many working class English were recruited by the early Mormon church in the 19th century, often straight out of the slums. These people never had the opportunity to assimilate into an American identity.

    BTW, in Ireland people still use the word "crack" (whence "cracker" derives) to describe a certain atmosphere of lighthearted banter and fellowship. They spell it "craic," and I've seen pubs that advertised themselves as having "good craic," which struck me as pretty funny. Americans still occasionally use the archaic crack in expressions such as "not all it's cracked up to be" or "wisecrack."

    The reason you don’t see many Southerners calling themselves “English” is because most of them would choose “American” or “Southern” as their ethnicity.

    why are you telling me this? i’ve blogged this.

    My pet theory is that the Scots Irish are actually descended from the north Brythonic speaking people, AKA the Picts. Many of their surnames, such as Knox, Wallace and Abercrombie strongly suggest this to be the case.

    no, not picts technically. probably the northern britons who were part of the kingdom of rheged and later became the rump of strathclyde (cumbria obviously cognate to cymru). the pictish lands were further north, and generally those areas never under roman domination.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill P

    why are you telling me this? i’ve blogged this.
     
    Missed that one.

    no, not picts technically. probably the northern britons who were part of the kingdom of rheged and later became the rump of strathclyde (cumbria obviously cognate to cymru). the pictish lands were further north, and generally those areas never under roman domination.
     
    You're right, not technically Picts as in straight line from Picts to Scots Irish, but certainly they contributed to the people now known as Scots Irish (Edinburgh was a major Pictish center back in Roman times). "Scots Irish" as an ethnicity is as much a product of religion as ancestry/geography. If any man created a Scots Irish identity, it was John Knox. Ironically, they were as Calvinist as the Puritans, but obviously a very different people. I don't think their reputation as a bunch of louts is deserved. If anything, they were hated because they were so militant, and because of that people were scared of them.

    It's because they were such implacable warriors that they have a bad reputation today. But without them, there would be no United States of America. Not only were they the most solidly pro-independence of all colonial Americans, they were also eager and willing to lay down their lives for it. A little known fact about Scots Irish is that they also tended to oppose slavery, on account of so many of their brethren having been shipped off in chains to colonial plantations, which may as well have been death camps.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Razib Khan
    a few points

    1) some ppl on this blog have pointed out that in places like w. virginia there are lots of ppl from england proper

    2) 'scots-irish' does not obviously mean just ulster. includes those coming directly from south scotland/north england

    3) *albion's seed* does not say that scots-irish = the south. the lowland cavalier culture is important, and shaped the 'bourbon' elite a lot. but for whatever reason it hasn't captured the national imagination.

    I’m half Scots Irish, and none of my Scots Irish ancestry comes from south of Pennsylvania/Ohio, while some comes from as far north as New Hampshire and Vermont (New Englanders imported them to act as a buffer against the Indians). The reason you don’t see many Southerners calling themselves “English” is because most of them would choose “American” or “Southern” as their ethnicity. But in fact the South is one of the most English parts of the country, both culturally and in terms of ancestry. They love tea, gardens, hunting with hounds, riding and literature. Names like Adams, Smith, Johnson and the like are more common there than in the rest of the country.

    As for the Scots Irish, after they pushed West past the Appalachians (which legions of them did in the early 19th century), most of them seem to have lost their Scots Irishness and settled into a comfortable “American” identity. In my family, for example, none of them even stayed with the Presbyterian Church. You’d never even guess they were Scots Irish unless you knew a lot about surnames. They were absorbed seamlessly into American institutions, the military being one of the most important, and when they emerged they were nothing like the caricature of the Scots Irish hillbilly. However, arguably their overrepresentation in the military does suggest a certain retention of their ancient martial tradition. My pet theory is that the Scots Irish are actually descended from the north Brythonic speaking people, AKA the Picts. Many of their surnames, such as Knox, Wallace and Abercrombie strongly suggest this to be the case.

    Lots of Mormons call themselves English because so many working class English were recruited by the early Mormon church in the 19th century, often straight out of the slums. These people never had the opportunity to assimilate into an American identity.

    BTW, in Ireland people still use the word “crack” (whence “cracker” derives) to describe a certain atmosphere of lighthearted banter and fellowship. They spell it “craic,” and I’ve seen pubs that advertised themselves as having “good craic,” which struck me as pretty funny. Americans still occasionally use the archaic crack in expressions such as “not all it’s cracked up to be” or “wisecrack.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Razib Khan
    The reason you don’t see many Southerners calling themselves “English” is because most of them would choose “American” or “Southern” as their ethnicity.

    why are you telling me this? i've blogged this.

    My pet theory is that the Scots Irish are actually descended from the north Brythonic speaking people, AKA the Picts. Many of their surnames, such as Knox, Wallace and Abercrombie strongly suggest this to be the case.

    no, not picts technically. probably the northern britons who were part of the kingdom of rheged and later became the rump of strathclyde (cumbria obviously cognate to cymru). the pictish lands were further north, and generally those areas never under roman domination.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I wonder if most or all of the difference between English ancestry in Mormon country and the lower levels elsewhere is due to the Mormons’ obsession with genealogy. Mormons don’t call their ancestry of “American ethnicity” since they have records showing what part of England their supposed ancestor came from back in 1640 whatever.

    In other words, people from old-American stock in Kentucky or Pennsylvania or whereever don’t know who their great-grandfather’s great-grandfather was, because honestly, who gives a crap, but Mormons know with a certainty that is touchingly naive.

    I’m not a Mormon anymore, but my whole extended family still is. My father excitedly called me a few months ago with the “news” – that we were now Jews as well as Mormons! Why? Because someone about 12 generations back on another continent was named Benjamin! Well, OK.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The Mormons who followed Brigham Young out to Utah were only about 2/3 of the Mormon community at the time of Joseph Smith’s death. Of these Brighamite Mormons, roughly 50% were European converts, mostly English and Scottish, but also Danish, Swedish, etc. These followed Brigham Young at a higher rate than the American-born Mormons because they’d largely been converted by members of the Quorum of the Twelve, which took over leadership of the Utah branch after Smith’s death. There were other claimants, of course.

    My point in all of this is that a big chunk of that self-reported English ancestry dates to mid-19th century converts to Mormonism in the British Isles. Like in most of the American population, the English part of the balance is probably under-reported due a greater knowledge of more recent immigrant ancestors.

    In my own ancestry, I’m about 50% descended from early Puritan stock, and 50% from these later Mormon converts, with a roughly equal mix of Scottish, English, and Scandinavian. I do not self-identify as a Mormon anymore, but almost everyone in my extended family still does.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    I've done some digging around Mormon family genealogies and keep being surprised at how often Mormons descend from immigrants who came from England in the late 1800s. It seems there are plenty of Mormons who aren't old-stock American at all.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Halvorson
    3) *albion’s seed* does not say that scots-irish = the south.

    The thing is, this post does. When you say,

    The original Mormons were by and large Yankees, and their migration west took them into the lands of the Scots-Irish, who descended upon them like wolves to the slaughter, as was often the case when Yankees faced Scots-Irish in an unorganized fashion.

    it sure makes it seem as 1830s Missouri was majority Scotch Irish when it wasn't even close. If by "Scotch-Irish" you mean borderers, then you can say that. But even if you're being as generous to Fischer as possible borderers never outnumbered regular English folk in the South. If you add up the Scotch Irish+ all the Scots +25% percent (the number Fischer chose) of the English in Purvis that non-Borderer English remain the dominant ethnicity in every state but South Carolina and Tennessee, where they're about even.

    yeah, i saw that in the reread. that wasn’t correct to write.

    but in the original comment you seemed to assert that *albion’s seed* said that. it didn’t.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Razib Khan
    a few points

    1) some ppl on this blog have pointed out that in places like w. virginia there are lots of ppl from england proper

    2) 'scots-irish' does not obviously mean just ulster. includes those coming directly from south scotland/north england

    3) *albion's seed* does not say that scots-irish = the south. the lowland cavalier culture is important, and shaped the 'bourbon' elite a lot. but for whatever reason it hasn't captured the national imagination.

    3) *albion’s seed* does not say that scots-irish = the south.

    The thing is, this post does. When you say,

    The original Mormons were by and large Yankees, and their migration west took them into the lands of the Scots-Irish, who descended upon them like wolves to the slaughter, as was often the case when Yankees faced Scots-Irish in an unorganized fashion.

    it sure makes it seem as 1830s Missouri was majority Scotch Irish when it wasn’t even close. If by “Scotch-Irish” you mean borderers, then you can say that. But even if you’re being as generous to Fischer as possible borderers never outnumbered regular English folk in the South. If you add up the Scotch Irish+ all the Scots +25% percent (the number Fischer chose) of the English in Purvis that non-Borderer English remain the dominant ethnicity in every state but South Carolina and Tennessee, where they’re about even.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Razib Khan
    yeah, i saw that in the reread. that wasn't correct to write.

    but in the original comment you seemed to assert that *albion's seed* said that. it didn't.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    Carolina planters were in from the gitgo. I don't known of any migration impact from the Haiti rebellion. Haiti increased the fear of slave rebellion which was already at fever pitch.
    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Thanks for the link to the paper. I will have to complete it later, it looks very interesting. I find it quite telling that interspersed with scholarly writing there are all these little moral messages. Many, many inoculations against charges of racial insensitivity. It appears that one cannot just write history anymore; you have project everything back and keep repeating, “We don’t think like that anymore.”

    I just didn’t understand the point about Carolina planters, some few that came from Barbados, but the original ones that built the rice and indigo and Sea Island cotton plantations were mostly English.

    Alexandre Pétion of Haiti gave Simon Bolivar a substantial assist with men and material at a crucial and trying time in Bolivar’s struggle.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Razib Khan
    the carolina planters from carib. also somewhat later in time than the other migrations, right? didn't a lot of it happen after 1800, with french leaving haiti and british abolition of slavery in 1830s?

    Carolina planters were in from the gitgo. I don’t known of any migration impact from the Haiti rebellion. Haiti increased the fear of slave rebellion which was already at fever pitch.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Razib Khan
    http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4049&context=etd
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Halvorson
    Your post here is mostly about Mormons, but I feel the need to push back against "the Southerners are Scotch-Irish" meme that Albion's Seed and this blog have made so popular. I was skeptical of this and so I dug through Fischer's sources looking for raw numbers and found this table, based on a surname study by Purvis:

    https://postimg.org/image/7nf370pbz/

    Southerners were only 15 percent Scotch Irish in 1790, at which point emigration from Ulster had ceased. This number is perfectly consistent with the genealogical digging I've done on Southern signers of the Declaration of Independence and Confederate generals with well documented pedigrees. The entirety of the South's cultural distinctiveness cannot be explained away by pointing to this very small minority of people.

    The entirety of the South’s cultural distinctiveness cannot be explained away by pointing to this very small minority of people.

    Well, we own it, and have for some time, so deal with it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twinkie

    Well, we own it, and have for some time, so deal with it.
     
    I am from East Asia, but I feel the greatest sense of kinship with the Scotch-Irish in America, even more so than with my wife's people, the ever genteel, productive Yankee-German-Scandinavian folk of the Midwest.

    I love their music, I love their martial spirit, I love their grit and humor.* I love their sense of personal and familiar honor, which seems to have been sapped out of the rest of mercantile whites in this country. I even "get" their religion, having been a staunch Calvinist earlier in my life.

    *I started watching a TV series called "Quarry" recently, and there is a character who says something I think perfectly captures the Scotch-Irish grit and humor. The character is not necessarily Scotch-Irish, but she may as well be. While stitching up her wounded son who whines about the pain, she says "Our people don't die of gunshot wounds. We die of alcoholism and heart disease."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Yudi
    The Cavalier culture is not *currently* capturing the national imagination, because it has been in decline for decades, as Woodard pointed out in his book. It was once a very important component of the national culture--Southerners used to be proud to point out that national heroes like Washington and Jefferson were slaveholding planters, whereas today those facts are unpleasant and swept under the rug.

    However, there is a third Southern subculture that Fischer does not discuss in Albion's Seed, namely the Deep South (probably because a) the Carolina planters came from elsewhere in the New World, not a region of Britain; and b) because he presumably wanted to keep the book under a thousand pages). Woodard does talk about them, however, and they do still loom large in the national imagination, viz. Dylan Roof.

    The current Mormon alliance is mainly with the Scots-Irish and the Deep South, as Tidewater is disappearing.

    the carolina planters from carib. also somewhat later in time than the other migrations, right? didn’t a lot of it happen after 1800, with french leaving haiti and british abolition of slavery in 1830s?

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Carolina planters were in from the gitgo. I don't known of any migration impact from the Haiti rebellion. Haiti increased the fear of slave rebellion which was already at fever pitch.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Razib Khan
    a few points

    1) some ppl on this blog have pointed out that in places like w. virginia there are lots of ppl from england proper

    2) 'scots-irish' does not obviously mean just ulster. includes those coming directly from south scotland/north england

    3) *albion's seed* does not say that scots-irish = the south. the lowland cavalier culture is important, and shaped the 'bourbon' elite a lot. but for whatever reason it hasn't captured the national imagination.

    The Cavalier culture is not *currently* capturing the national imagination, because it has been in decline for decades, as Woodard pointed out in his book. It was once a very important component of the national culture–Southerners used to be proud to point out that national heroes like Washington and Jefferson were slaveholding planters, whereas today those facts are unpleasant and swept under the rug.

    However, there is a third Southern subculture that Fischer does not discuss in Albion’s Seed, namely the Deep South (probably because a) the Carolina planters came from elsewhere in the New World, not a region of Britain; and b) because he presumably wanted to keep the book under a thousand pages). Woodard does talk about them, however, and they do still loom large in the national imagination, viz. Dylan Roof.

    The current Mormon alliance is mainly with the Scots-Irish and the Deep South, as Tidewater is disappearing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Razib Khan
    the carolina planters from carib. also somewhat later in time than the other migrations, right? didn't a lot of it happen after 1800, with french leaving haiti and british abolition of slavery in 1830s?
    , @Twinkie

    The current Mormon alliance is mainly with the Scots-Irish and the Deep South, as Tidewater is disappearing.
     
    The cultural and linguistic obliteration of Tidewater is deeply sad to me, in part because my older children* grew up and learned to speak as babies there. They still have more than a trace of this accent: https://youtu.be/1RzVKCWXrRA

    It was, I suppose, inevitable given the outsized economic roles that military bases and federal facilities have played in the big cities of the region. They brought a great deal of diversity and the monolithic national-popular culture that just overwhelmed what remained of the local flavor in the cities.

    Still, there are small towns and rural villages in the Tidewater area that retain the older local culture, including the dialect. One of my hunting buddies is from the area - his family has been there for over 200 years and still owns some bits of land (the Civil War and its aftermath destroyed much of the Cavalier society and prosperity, and eminent domain put the final nail in the conffin). One still sees occasional small cotton fields in Tidewater!

    *My younger children can shift at will between a mild Mid-Atlanic accent and Appalachian, reflecting the two residences in which they have grown. So we have quite a bit of linguistic diversity in my family (I speak with a mix of New England/New York accents and my wife speaks Standard Midwestern). Together as a family we culturally identify as Southerners, but my children will knock their mother and me for being carpetbaggers whilst they are, of course, the native-born of Dixie.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Halvorson
    Your post here is mostly about Mormons, but I feel the need to push back against "the Southerners are Scotch-Irish" meme that Albion's Seed and this blog have made so popular. I was skeptical of this and so I dug through Fischer's sources looking for raw numbers and found this table, based on a surname study by Purvis:

    https://postimg.org/image/7nf370pbz/

    Southerners were only 15 percent Scotch Irish in 1790, at which point emigration from Ulster had ceased. This number is perfectly consistent with the genealogical digging I've done on Southern signers of the Declaration of Independence and Confederate generals with well documented pedigrees. The entirety of the South's cultural distinctiveness cannot be explained away by pointing to this very small minority of people.

    a few points

    1) some ppl on this blog have pointed out that in places like w. virginia there are lots of ppl from england proper

    2) ‘scots-irish’ does not obviously mean just ulster. includes those coming directly from south scotland/north england

    3) *albion’s seed* does not say that scots-irish = the south. the lowland cavalier culture is important, and shaped the ‘bourbon’ elite a lot. but for whatever reason it hasn’t captured the national imagination.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yudi
    The Cavalier culture is not *currently* capturing the national imagination, because it has been in decline for decades, as Woodard pointed out in his book. It was once a very important component of the national culture--Southerners used to be proud to point out that national heroes like Washington and Jefferson were slaveholding planters, whereas today those facts are unpleasant and swept under the rug.

    However, there is a third Southern subculture that Fischer does not discuss in Albion's Seed, namely the Deep South (probably because a) the Carolina planters came from elsewhere in the New World, not a region of Britain; and b) because he presumably wanted to keep the book under a thousand pages). Woodard does talk about them, however, and they do still loom large in the national imagination, viz. Dylan Roof.

    The current Mormon alliance is mainly with the Scots-Irish and the Deep South, as Tidewater is disappearing.
    , @Halvorson
    3) *albion’s seed* does not say that scots-irish = the south.

    The thing is, this post does. When you say,

    The original Mormons were by and large Yankees, and their migration west took them into the lands of the Scots-Irish, who descended upon them like wolves to the slaughter, as was often the case when Yankees faced Scots-Irish in an unorganized fashion.

    it sure makes it seem as 1830s Missouri was majority Scotch Irish when it wasn't even close. If by "Scotch-Irish" you mean borderers, then you can say that. But even if you're being as generous to Fischer as possible borderers never outnumbered regular English folk in the South. If you add up the Scotch Irish+ all the Scots +25% percent (the number Fischer chose) of the English in Purvis that non-Borderer English remain the dominant ethnicity in every state but South Carolina and Tennessee, where they're about even.
    , @Bill P
    I'm half Scots Irish, and none of my Scots Irish ancestry comes from south of Pennsylvania/Ohio, while some comes from as far north as New Hampshire and Vermont (New Englanders imported them to act as a buffer against the Indians). The reason you don't see many Southerners calling themselves "English" is because most of them would choose "American" or "Southern" as their ethnicity. But in fact the South is one of the most English parts of the country, both culturally and in terms of ancestry. They love tea, gardens, hunting with hounds, riding and literature. Names like Adams, Smith, Johnson and the like are more common there than in the rest of the country.

    As for the Scots Irish, after they pushed West past the Appalachians (which legions of them did in the early 19th century), most of them seem to have lost their Scots Irishness and settled into a comfortable "American" identity. In my family, for example, none of them even stayed with the Presbyterian Church. You'd never even guess they were Scots Irish unless you knew a lot about surnames. They were absorbed seamlessly into American institutions, the military being one of the most important, and when they emerged they were nothing like the caricature of the Scots Irish hillbilly. However, arguably their overrepresentation in the military does suggest a certain retention of their ancient martial tradition. My pet theory is that the Scots Irish are actually descended from the north Brythonic speaking people, AKA the Picts. Many of their surnames, such as Knox, Wallace and Abercrombie strongly suggest this to be the case.

    Lots of Mormons call themselves English because so many working class English were recruited by the early Mormon church in the 19th century, often straight out of the slums. These people never had the opportunity to assimilate into an American identity.

    BTW, in Ireland people still use the word "crack" (whence "cracker" derives) to describe a certain atmosphere of lighthearted banter and fellowship. They spell it "craic," and I've seen pubs that advertised themselves as having "good craic," which struck me as pretty funny. Americans still occasionally use the archaic crack in expressions such as "not all it's cracked up to be" or "wisecrack."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Your post here is mostly about Mormons, but I feel the need to push back against “the Southerners are Scotch-Irish” meme that Albion’s Seed and this blog have made so popular. I was skeptical of this and so I dug through Fischer’s sources looking for raw numbers and found this table, based on a surname study by Purvis:

    https://postimg.org/image/7nf370pbz/

    Southerners were only 15 percent Scotch Irish in 1790, at which point emigration from Ulster had ceased. This number is perfectly consistent with the genealogical digging I’ve done on Southern signers of the Declaration of Independence and Confederate generals with well documented pedigrees. The entirety of the South’s cultural distinctiveness cannot be explained away by pointing to this very small minority of people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Razib Khan
    a few points

    1) some ppl on this blog have pointed out that in places like w. virginia there are lots of ppl from england proper

    2) 'scots-irish' does not obviously mean just ulster. includes those coming directly from south scotland/north england

    3) *albion's seed* does not say that scots-irish = the south. the lowland cavalier culture is important, and shaped the 'bourbon' elite a lot. but for whatever reason it hasn't captured the national imagination.
    , @iffen
    The entirety of the South’s cultural distinctiveness cannot be explained away by pointing to this very small minority of people.

    Well, we own it, and have for some time, so deal with it.

    , @PD Shaw
    "I feel the need to push back against “the Southerners are Scotch-Irish” meme that Albion’s Seed and this blog have made so popular."

    Perhaps repeating a point, but Albion's Seed classified Scots-Irish with lowland Scots and Northern English, referring either to Northern British or Borderlanders.

    Second, looking at people who signed the Declaration of Independence and served as generals for the Confederacy is a poor sampling of Americans. These are elites. The Borderlanders mostly arrived btw/ 1765-1775, so they are not establishment figures.

    Third, the Borderlanders appear to have married younger, emigrated with more women than any group outside of New England, and had more children both in and out of wedlock, so the 1790 census may not adequately describe demographic impact.

    I think you are right that there appears to be a tendency to equate Southerners with the Scots-Irish, but Albion's Seed has a quarter of its contents dedicated to the Distressed Cavaliers and their servants, which formed the base of the South. Fischer even has the temerity to identify African-Americans as Southerners in this sense (contributors and propagators). But the Northern British were more Western than Southern.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • From my new column in Taki's Magazine: Read the whole thing there.
  • @syonredux

    "I consider Napoleon, Fox, and Hamilton, the three greatest men of our epoch, and if I were forced to decide between the three, I would give without hesitation the first place to Hamilton. "
     
    Talleyrand on Alexander Hamilton

    Although Napoleon himself didn’t hold Talleyrand in great regard:
    « Vous êtes de la merde dans un bas de soie ! »
    “(a piece of) shit in a silk stocking”

    http://www.talleyrand.org/vieprivee/talleyrand_injures.htm

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Dave Pinsen
    Of those, I've seen Rent, Wicked, and Sunset Boulevard on Broadway. Seasons of Love isn't Rent's best song, IMO. I always liked One Song / Glory, and Light My Candle are better. It's got several memorable songs, which is kind of rare for a musical.

    I couldn't name any Sunset Boulevard songs without looking them up, or even remember a melody. I do remember it was a really classy, expensive-looking production, and it had some clever lines in it.

    Wicked was an impressive bit of theater too, but there's really only that one song I remember. Most musicals are lucky to have more than 2 or 3 really good songs. One exception, in addition to Rent, was The Rocky Horror Picture Show. Most of the soundtrack is pretty good.

    I'll try to give Jersey Boys another try next time it's on.

    BTW, Fox put on a live performance of Grease on Sunday night, and it was really spectacular. You can watch the recording of it via the link in the tweet below.
    https://twitter.com/juliannehough/status/695014406455848961

    “which is kind of rare for a musical”

    Musicals used to have reserved spots on the charts, way back when people actually used to know songwriters’ names. I don’t know when that changed, though obviously rock and roll had something to do with it. But for a long while Broadway still churned out hits with Sondheim, Hamlisch, Weber, and so forth. But I can’t name one damn song from the last 20+ years, though I could probably recognize one from Rent if I heard it. I’ve heard the name “Defying Gravity,” but honestly have no idea how it goes.

    I have no idea what they’re up to nowadays, what audience they write for, or how they’d stay in business if it weren’t for revivals, reviews, and movie adaptations. I accidentally tuned into the Tonys recently for a split second and saw some girl singing about a fascinating wallet chain some lesbian wore over to her house that inspired her towards a life of lesbianism. What the hell? Broadway was always gay, since when were they nothing but gay (or “street”)?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Clyde
    While reading Ron Chernow’s exhaustive 2004 Hamilton biography, Mr. Miranda was struck by the parallels between Hamilton — an illegitimate immigrant from the West Indies who rose to power largely by the sheer force of his rhetoric — and such hustlers-turned-moguls as Jay Z.

    “By the second chapter, I was like, ‘I know this guy,’ ” Mr. Miranda said. “Just the hustle and ambition it took to get him off the island — this is a guy who wrote his way out of his circumstances from the get-go. That is part and parcel with the hip-hop narrative: writing your way out of your circumstances, writing the future you want to see for yourself. This is a guy who wrote at 14, ‘I wish there was a war.’ It doesn’t get more hip-hop than that.”
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/theater/lin-manuel-miranda-and-others-from-hamilton-talk-history.html

    Personal ambition and rags to riches is relevant to hip-hop, plus a million other things. “I wish there was a war” is a little more on the mark, as is the fact that he’d always be seen as a jumped up bastard brat, and that his mind is always on money. But I don’t see much else tying Hamilton to hip-hop culture.

    No doubt he’d have been mocked for “acting white.” He was a math whiz, went to private school, was partly self-taught, worked hard as a clerk, sucked up to the powerful, and so on. And it’s not as if he joined a street gang; he was in a real army, even if it wasn’t the legitimate army before it won the war. How “hip-hop” is it to go into the army?

    Read More
    • Agree: Clyde
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Clyde
    While reading Ron Chernow’s exhaustive 2004 Hamilton biography, Mr. Miranda was struck by the parallels between Hamilton — an illegitimate immigrant from the West Indies who rose to power largely by the sheer force of his rhetoric — and such hustlers-turned-moguls as Jay Z.

    “By the second chapter, I was like, ‘I know this guy,’ ” Mr. Miranda said. “Just the hustle and ambition it took to get him off the island — this is a guy who wrote his way out of his circumstances from the get-go. That is part and parcel with the hip-hop narrative: writing your way out of your circumstances, writing the future you want to see for yourself. This is a guy who wrote at 14, ‘I wish there was a war.’ It doesn’t get more hip-hop than that.”
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/theater/lin-manuel-miranda-and-others-from-hamilton-talk-history.html

    ‘I wish there was a war.’ It doesn’t get more hip-hop than that.”

    Well, that certainly ties a lot of loose ends together.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wilkey
    Yes, I meant to mention "Rent." "Seasons of Love" counts as a kind of holiday song. But even "Rent" is now 20 years old, believe it or not, and its one or two songs aren't remotely as popular as anything from "Phantom." It's a bit of a shock to me, though, that songs from ALW's slightly more recent "Sunset Boulevard" aren't more popular. It has a few numbers that are every bit as good as anything in "Phantom."

    I did overlook "Wicked," (which did not win best musical) but I intentionally excluded film musicals, especially Disney.

    And I think you should give "Jersey Boys" another go. It's seriously pretty spectacular. Clint Eastwood did a great job directing the movie, and the closing credits are pretty damn good - they inject a little bit of Broadway into the movie.

    Of those, I’ve seen Rent, Wicked, and Sunset Boulevard on Broadway. Seasons of Love isn’t Rent’s best song, IMO. I always liked One Song / Glory, and Light My Candle are better. It’s got several memorable songs, which is kind of rare for a musical.

    I couldn’t name any Sunset Boulevard songs without looking them up, or even remember a melody. I do remember it was a really classy, expensive-looking production, and it had some clever lines in it.

    Wicked was an impressive bit of theater too, but there’s really only that one song I remember. Most musicals are lucky to have more than 2 or 3 really good songs. One exception, in addition to Rent, was The Rocky Horror Picture Show. Most of the soundtrack is pretty good.

    I’ll try to give Jersey Boys another try next time it’s on.

    BTW, Fox put on a live performance of Grease on Sunday night, and it was really spectacular. You can watch the recording of it via the link in the tweet below.

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    "which is kind of rare for a musical"

    Musicals used to have reserved spots on the charts, way back when people actually used to know songwriters' names. I don't know when that changed, though obviously rock and roll had something to do with it. But for a long while Broadway still churned out hits with Sondheim, Hamlisch, Weber, and so forth. But I can't name one damn song from the last 20+ years, though I could probably recognize one from Rent if I heard it. I've heard the name "Defying Gravity," but honestly have no idea how it goes.

    I have no idea what they're up to nowadays, what audience they write for, or how they'd stay in business if it weren't for revivals, reviews, and movie adaptations. I accidentally tuned into the Tonys recently for a split second and saw some girl singing about a fascinating wallet chain some lesbian wore over to her house that inspired her towards a life of lesbianism. What the hell? Broadway was always gay, since when were they nothing but gay (or "street")?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • While reading Ron Chernow’s exhaustive 2004 Hamilton biography, Mr. Miranda was struck by the parallels between Hamilton — an illegitimate immigrant from the West Indies who rose to power largely by the sheer force of his rhetoric — and such hustlers-turned-moguls as Jay Z.

    “By the second chapter, I was like, ‘I know this guy,’ ” Mr. Miranda said. “Just the hustle and ambition it took to get him off the island — this is a guy who wrote his way out of his circumstances from the get-go. That is part and parcel with the hip-hop narrative: writing your way out of your circumstances, writing the future you want to see for yourself. This is a guy who wrote at 14, ‘I wish there was a war.’ It doesn’t get more hip-hop than that.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/theater/lin-manuel-miranda-and-others-from-hamilton-talk-history.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Desiderius

    ‘I wish there was a war.’ It doesn’t get more hip-hop than that.”
     
    Well, that certainly ties a lot of loose ends together.
    , @guest
    Personal ambition and rags to riches is relevant to hip-hop, plus a million other things. "I wish there was a war" is a little more on the mark, as is the fact that he'd always be seen as a jumped up bastard brat, and that his mind is always on money. But I don't see much else tying Hamilton to hip-hop culture.

    No doubt he'd have been mocked for "acting white." He was a math whiz, went to private school, was partly self-taught, worked hard as a clerk, sucked up to the powerful, and so on. And it's not as if he joined a street gang; he was in a real army, even if it wasn't the legitimate army before it won the war. How "hip-hop" is it to go into the army?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @NOTA
    How do they avoid incentivizing people to come across the border in hopes of getting sent home with the cash?

    If an illegal returns who was given cash to GTFO, then he gets booted. He already got paid once. You are correct. The details need to be worked out. One way is that after you have gotten rid of your undesirable illegals, asylum seekers and refugees via a free plane home and cash incentives, you tighten things up so they cannot make a repeat appearance on you soil.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Steve Sailer
    Hamilton didn't shoot into the ground or straight up into the air. He shot a branch above and behind Burr. His defenders have various theories for why Burr shouldn't have seen this as hostile intent on Hamilton's part. (I believe they were entitled to reload and take a second shot at each other.) One pro-Hamilton theory is that he wasn't going to shoot at Burr but Burr shot first and Hamilton's shot was a spasmodic reaction to being hit. Well, maybe ...

    All in all, it's hard to imagine Ben Franklin getting himself into such a jam and not getting himself otu.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @tbraton
    I believe you are omitting from your alternative history the fact that Brazil peacefully ended slavery in 1888, the last state in the Western Hemisphere to do so and a mere 23 years after the end of our Civil War which took the lives of upward of 750,000 Americans. The fact of the matter is that slavery was becoming uneconomical and would have ended on economic grounds without the need of the bloodshed of our Civil War.

    I believe any attempt to make Nicaragua a state would have first required a treaty to make it a territory of the U.S. and would have required a 2/3 vote of the U.S. Senate. After all, the Louisiana Purchase was submitted to the Senate as a treaty and was approved by the Senate by more than a 2/3 vote. A similar proposal was made by President Grant to make the Dominican Republic a territory with a path to statehood in 1870, but the Senate defeated the proposed treaty by a 28-28 vote, and the Dominican Republic never became a state. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annexation_of_Santo_Domingo#Treaty_submitted_and_failure

    I’m much less confident than you. Brazilian landowning and business interests were opposed to abolition (which occurred only because of a princess’s imperial decree, and was motivated mainly by moral concerns) and their opposition led to the deposition of the Brazilian emperor the next year and his replacement by an oligarchic republic, although the new Brazilian government didn’t try to put the genie back in the bottle. Without the forced destruction of U.S. slavery it doesn’t happen, at least not in 1888.

    Slavery was never economical from the perspective of the general public, it only prospered for a powerful and well-megaphoned aristocracy, but that was formidable enough. You’re right that the admission of new territory would have required 2/3 Senate ratification, but the filibustering movements were operating in a social context which had just seen the successful annexation of Texas in 1845, the Mexican Cession of 1848, and the Gadsden Purchase of 1853, all expected to be entirely or mostly slave territory, and the fact that a Republican president like Grant would later seek the annexation of the modern Dominican Republic a few years later proves that northern interests which aligned with the Slavocracy in favoring the earlier acquisitions of territory were still present in the 1870s. The Senate that rejected Santo Domingo was more than 80% Republican with most of the former Confederate states still under Reconstruction governments, and responding to the altered political conditions that followed the Civil War and abolition of slavery. It still got half.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jim Don Bob
    A good biography of Aaron Burr would be nice. I have never understood him. Or Benedict Arnold either. The reigning stories don't ring true to me.

    One wonders whether Vidal went far enough ’round the bend to come back again to something approaching the truth.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @syonredux

    "I consider Napoleon, Fox, and Hamilton, the three greatest men of our epoch, and if I were forced to decide between the three, I would give without hesitation the first place to Hamilton. "
     
    Talleyrand on Alexander Hamilton

    Talleyrand being characteristically modest.

    The honor goes to Talleyrand himself.

    Read More
    • Agree: Dave Pinsen
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Steve Sailer
    Hamilton didn't shoot into the ground or straight up into the air. He shot a branch above and behind Burr. His defenders have various theories for why Burr shouldn't have seen this as hostile intent on Hamilton's part. (I believe they were entitled to reload and take a second shot at each other.) One pro-Hamilton theory is that he wasn't going to shoot at Burr but Burr shot first and Hamilton's shot was a spasmodic reaction to being hit. Well, maybe ...

    All in all, it's hard to imagine Ben Franklin getting himself into such a jam and not getting himself otu.

    A good biography of Aaron Burr would be nice. I have never understood him. Or Benedict Arnold either. The reigning stories don’t ring true to me.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Desiderius
    One wonders whether Vidal went far enough 'round the bend to come back again to something approaching the truth.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • An exercise in historical masochism:

    US Presidents, 1789-1820: Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe

    US Presidents, 1989-2020: GHW Bush, Bill Clinton, GW Bush, Barack Obama

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    "I wouldn’t worry about this starting a trend of rap musicals."

    How wrong you are. If you know anything about how cultural trends work, there will be a deluge of nothing but rap musicals.

    “How wrong you are. If you know anything about how cultural trends work, there will be a deluge of nothing but rap musicals.”

    Rap music is over 30 years old. “In the Heights,” Miranda’s first rap musical, is about a decade old. It won a lot of Tony Awards but it isn’t especially popular. The audience for rap and the audience for musical theatre don’t overlap all that much, and probably never will. There will be musicals with rap numbers in them, just as so many musicals like to have a variety of musical styles in them, but rap musicals will be rare. Popular rap musicals will be even rarer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “I consider Napoleon, Fox, and Hamilton, the three greatest men of our epoch, and if I were forced to decide between the three, I would give without hesitation the first place to Hamilton. “

    Talleyrand on Alexander Hamilton

    Read More
    • Replies: @Desiderius
    Talleyrand being characteristically modest.

    The honor goes to Talleyrand himself.
    , @BB753
    Although Napoleon himself didn't hold Talleyrand in great regard:
    « Vous êtes de la merde dans un bas de soie ! »
    "(a piece of) shit in a silk stocking"

    http://www.talleyrand.org/vieprivee/talleyrand_injures.htm
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Steve Sailer
    Hamilton didn't shoot into the ground or straight up into the air. He shot a branch above and behind Burr. His defenders have various theories for why Burr shouldn't have seen this as hostile intent on Hamilton's part. (I believe they were entitled to reload and take a second shot at each other.) One pro-Hamilton theory is that he wasn't going to shoot at Burr but Burr shot first and Hamilton's shot was a spasmodic reaction to being hit. Well, maybe ...

    All in all, it's hard to imagine Ben Franklin getting himself into such a jam and not getting himself otu.

    I don’t want to get into the minutiae of the duel. Let’s say Hamilton wanted to kill Burr, for argument’s sake. Still, it was Burr who challenged Hamilton, wasn’t it? With an intent to kill him. I’m not a gentleman, we stand outside the traditions of the code duello, and Hamilton was provided an opportunity to defend himself. Burr didn’t ambush him on the way home from work and shoot him in the back, or anything. But he did shoot him with the intent to kill him for the fact that he was a political rival (and that he besmirched his honor, and blah, blah, blah).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.