The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / On "Admin"
 All Comments / On "Admin"
    This appears to be my 1,000th post at The Unz Review (including the archives from my old blogs). Coincidentally, it will also be my 100th post this year, which would represent an almost threefold increase in intensity relative to 2015-2016. So I guess now is as good a time as any to launch my first...
  • On the basis of a sample size of one, seemingly, the BBC declares that Russia is better for women:

    Why is Russia so good at encouraging women into tech?

    http://www.bbc.com/news/business-39579321

    Is that more generally correct?

    According to Unesco, 29% of people in scientific research worldwide are women, compared with 41% in Russia. In the UK, about 4% of inventors are women, whereas the figure is 15% in Russia.

    Are they simply counting support and admin and secretaries to come up with that figure?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Yevardian
    I think you could quite easily compile some of your lengthier and better-quality posts over the years into a book compilation, as Derbyshire, Unz, Shamir have already done.

    Seconded.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Hail

    spending trillions of dollars on IQ black holes like Iraq
     
    Yes, and Trump may yet fulfill the Simpsons Prophecy (see 0:30, President Lisa Simpson: "We've inherited quite a budget crunch from President Trump...The country is broke.").

    (The episode, 'Bart to the Future,' aired first in March 2000, thus was written around early or mid 1999, or 16 years before Trump's June 2015 "They're Not Sending their Best" speech that launched his campaign, and 17.5 years before Trump's election victory. Show me a better forecaster of a presidential result!)

    In sum, the Three Eras of Political Trump may be:
    (1) "Trump as Politician" a Surreal, Simpsoneqsue Joke: 1990s to Summer 2015.
    (2) Trump as a legitimate populist-nationalist leader: Late Summer 2015 to March 2017.
    (3) Era of Trump as Neocon, Reckless Interventionist : April 2017 to ?

    Your writing on behalf of preventing (3) is and will be appreciated!

    The Trump administration from the episode apparently went broke because they “invested in the children” which is also kind of prophetic in a way in that America’s new children aren’t worth investing in. I’ve also been (on a whim) watching classic Simpsons seasons lately. I am astonished at how diverse the background characters are. It’s like 40% — kind of like today, more prophecy.

    At any rate, I appreciate your work, Anatoly. That and the fact that you’re the only ShitPoster on staff here. Looking forward to the game reviews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @NoFap_Newton
    Dear Akarlin
    What is the logic behind deep state/Bilderbergers/ZOG’s 666D chessplayers' incessant promotion of both amateur and professional interracial cuckold porn among the Western Christians? (one of the main reasons I was forced to quit porn)

    Doesn't it make many middle class and even higher class ZOGs vulnerable to cuckoldry themselves? (witness Jay Electronica doing the Rothschild's bride)

    Or is taking the hit of cuckoldry an acceptable risk compared to taking the hit of another 1933?

    “incessant promotion of both amateur and professional interracial cuckold porn among the Western Christians? (one of the main reasons I was forced to quit porn)”

    Christians shouldn’t be watching porn anyway, it’s good that you quit…whoever is behind all that cuckoldry porn, may have done you a favour by curing you of your porn addiction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Dear Akarlin
    What is the logic behind deep state/Bilderbergers/ZOG’s 666D chessplayers’ incessant promotion of both amateur and professional interracial cuckold porn among the Western Christians? (one of the main reasons I was forced to quit porn)

    Doesn’t it make many middle class and even higher class ZOGs vulnerable to cuckoldry themselves? (witness Jay Electronica doing the Rothschild’s bride)

    Or is taking the hit of cuckoldry an acceptable risk compared to taking the hit of another 1933?

    Read More
    • Replies: @German_reader
    "incessant promotion of both amateur and professional interracial cuckold porn among the Western Christians? (one of the main reasons I was forced to quit porn)"

    Christians shouldn't be watching porn anyway, it's good that you quit...whoever is behind all that cuckoldry porn, may have done you a favour by curing you of your porn addiction.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I think you could quite easily compile some of your lengthier and better-quality posts over the years into a book compilation, as Derbyshire, Unz, Shamir have already done.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Audacious Epigone
    Seconded.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Daniel Chieh
    Will we get Dark Equilibrium as part of Patreon funding?

    Yes, sure. In fact, I’ll throw it in on top (if >=$10).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Will we get Dark Equilibrium as part of Patreon funding?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    Yes, sure. In fact, I'll throw it in on top (if >=$10).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @neutral
    A troll comment, but I am certain that the number of people that would support precisely this is not as small a number as you think. In fact if the media decided to push this narrative then most people would probably end up supporting this view.

    there is a reason why I believe there are 6-8 stupids out of 10.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Hail says: • Website

    spending trillions of dollars on IQ black holes like Iraq

    Yes, and Trump may yet fulfill the Simpsons Prophecy (see 0:30, President Lisa Simpson: “We’ve inherited quite a budget crunch from President Trump…The country is broke.”).

    (The episode, ‘Bart to the Future,’ aired first in March 2000, thus was written around early or mid 1999, or 16 years before Trump’s June 2015 “They’re Not Sending their Best” speech that launched his campaign, and 17.5 years before Trump’s election victory. Show me a better forecaster of a presidential result!)

    In sum, the Three Eras of Political Trump may be:
    (1) “Trump as Politician” a Surreal, Simpsoneqsue Joke: 1990s to Summer 2015.
    (2) Trump as a legitimate populist-nationalist leader: Late Summer 2015 to March 2017.
    (3) Era of Trump as Neocon, Reckless Interventionist : April 2017 to ?

    Your writing on behalf of preventing (3) is and will be appreciated!

    Read More
    • Replies: @BenKenobi
    The Trump administration from the episode apparently went broke because they "invested in the children" which is also kind of prophetic in a way in that America's new children aren't worth investing in. I've also been (on a whim) watching classic Simpsons seasons lately. I am astonished at how diverse the background characters are. It's like 40% -- kind of like today, more prophecy.

    ---

    At any rate, I appreciate your work, Anatoly. That and the fact that you're the only ShitPoster on staff here. Looking forward to the game reviews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The New Malthus for a title? Idiocracy *is* the new Malthusian catastrophe.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    Congrats - this is quality trolling. I don't see this that often.

    Response: I don't think the "deep state" is anywhere near as competent as many of its critics make it out to be. At any rate, it is certainly not competent enough to implement or even accelerate the singularity. For instance, spending trillions of dollars on IQ black holes like Iraq instead of CRISPR or life extension or even balancing the budget. Or filling Europe with infinity Moslems. With the deep state/Bilderbergers/ZOG's 666D chess "ingenuity," you'll sooner get the Sub-Saharan Age than the Space Age.

    A troll comment, but I am certain that the number of people that would support precisely this is not as small a number as you think. In fact if the media decided to push this narrative then most people would probably end up supporting this view.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    there is a reason why I believe there are 6-8 stupids out of 10.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @colm
    Anatoly, wouldn't it be more beneficial for the world, including Russia, to dance to the tune of the Deep State so conflicts would be eliminated and everything we have can be thrown into developing AI so we reach singularity , and therefore the space, faster?

    In a utilitarian way, the Deep State is beneficial since its control of vast resources helps to develop technology faster.

    Congrats – this is quality trolling. I don’t see this that often.

    Response: I don’t think the “deep state” is anywhere near as competent as many of its critics make it out to be. At any rate, it is certainly not competent enough to implement or even accelerate the singularity. For instance, spending trillions of dollars on IQ black holes like Iraq instead of CRISPR or life extension or even balancing the budget. Or filling Europe with infinity Moslems. With the deep state/Bilderbergers/ZOG’s 666D chess “ingenuity,” you’ll sooner get the Sub-Saharan Age than the Space Age.

    Read More
    • Agree: Dan Hayes, Cyrano
    • Replies: @neutral
    A troll comment, but I am certain that the number of people that would support precisely this is not as small a number as you think. In fact if the media decided to push this narrative then most people would probably end up supporting this view.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anatoly, wouldn’t it be more beneficial for the world, including Russia, to dance to the tune of the Deep State so conflicts would be eliminated and everything we have can be thrown into developing AI so we reach singularity , and therefore the space, faster?

    In a utilitarian way, the Deep State is beneficial since its control of vast resources helps to develop technology faster.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    Congrats - this is quality trolling. I don't see this that often.

    Response: I don't think the "deep state" is anywhere near as competent as many of its critics make it out to be. At any rate, it is certainly not competent enough to implement or even accelerate the singularity. For instance, spending trillions of dollars on IQ black holes like Iraq instead of CRISPR or life extension or even balancing the budget. Or filling Europe with infinity Moslems. With the deep state/Bilderbergers/ZOG's 666D chess "ingenuity," you'll sooner get the Sub-Saharan Age than the Space Age.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • No, I haven't been murdered by SJWs yet, was just rather ill the first week of this month. And then the next week had to be devoted to getting up to date with RL things. Anyhow, with so much going down all around the world - Syria, Ukraine, the French elections, the climate change conference...
  • Read More
    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I was worried about you. I was about to implore Sailer or Unz drive over to your house to check on your welfare. I love your scientific take on geopolitics and your excellent writing and subtle sense of humor.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    Good to see you back, I'm wondering whether you have considered doing an update for your models regarding Russian demography, an update of the "Faces of the Future" post in essence that you did back in 2008. I have quite an interest in demographics and would like to see what differences seven years of data have made to Russia's projected population size going forward.

    Thanks. I have considered doing an update sometime in 2016 though I won’t promise anything.

    One roadblock is that I have many other projects.

    The other is that I no longer have access to MatLab which I used to do those simulations. I could either try pirating it, or jerryrigging what I have to work with (free) Scilab, but the idea I’m favoring at the moment is to convert it all to R (though I am currently not proficient enough in it to do that).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Good to see you back, I’m wondering whether you have considered doing an update for your models regarding Russian demography, an update of the “Faces of the Future” post in essence that you did back in 2008. I have quite an interest in demographics and would like to see what differences seven years of data have made to Russia’s projected population size going forward.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    Thanks. I have considered doing an update sometime in 2016 though I won't promise anything.

    One roadblock is that I have many other projects.

    The other is that I no longer have access to MatLab which I used to do those simulations. I could either try pirating it, or jerryrigging what I have to work with (free) Scilab, but the idea I'm favoring at the moment is to convert it all to R (though I am currently not proficient enough in it to do that).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • About time, suck it up.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I thought you had joined the Novo -russian resistance in Ukraine! Take care!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Yes, welcome back.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Welcome back!

    Read More
    • Agree: Stephen R. Diamond
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Didn’t know you were sick, Anatoly. Speedy recovery!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Get well, Mr. Karlin.
    I missed your work.
    Your ImffU.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • So as you might have noticed I took a somewhat extended hiatus in the past two months. This was pre-arranged with Ron Unz, as was the reduction in the number of my slots on the front page from three to one. I had to take care of some very time-demanding business related issues. But this...
  • Great quotes!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    Thanks!

    I can read Chinese at a basic level (took 10 semesters at university) but naturally have to do a lot of machine translation to understand real world texts.

    cool!

    PS: (don’t forget to also correct the name in the sidebar blogroll)

    加油!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @European-American
    Nice post!

    Typo correction (sorry can't help it!): Jacques Sapir.

    Also, I'm curious, for Xin Zhang, can you understand Chinese? Or do you use Google Translate? It does work rather well on his posts.

    Thanks!

    I can read Chinese at a basic level (took 10 semesters at university) but naturally have to do a lot of machine translation to understand real world texts.

    Read More
    • Replies: @European-American
    cool!

    PS: (don't forget to also correct the name in the sidebar blogroll)

    加油!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Nice post!

    Typo correction (sorry can’t help it!): Jacques Sapir.

    Also, I’m curious, for Xin Zhang, can you understand Chinese? Or do you use Google Translate? It does work rather well on his posts.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    Thanks!

    I can read Chinese at a basic level (took 10 semesters at university) but naturally have to do a lot of machine translation to understand real world texts.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • How about the (at least partial) overthrow of IQ in favor of common sense?

    In any democracy, ethics, self restraint, tolerance and honesty will always take a second seat to narcissism, avarice, bigotry & persecution, if only because people who play by the rules in any democracy are at a disadvantage to those who easily subvert the rules to their own advantage

    ^ Figuring figuring some crucial things out isn’t exactly rocket science -

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    I'm the son of Russian immigrant parents being persecuted for my traditional Eastern Slavic beliefs and gopnik colloquialisms. Please check your Anglo privilege and cut out the yanksplaining. #RussianLivesMatter

    Glad to see you back!

    Also, Unz.com is not a place to be PC. If you are easily offended go read the huffingtonpost.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Niccolo Salo
    What f-bomb? I don't see any 'fuck' in the blog entry.

    Looking forward to your entries, Anatoly.

    He meant “faggots”, 1 use of that above.

    Protip: Everybody is a fag on the internet: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Fag ;)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Whoa, what's up with that f-bomb?

    I'm against the wholesale mainstreaming of homosexuality, but I'm more against the mainstreaming of hatred.

    What f-bomb? I don’t see any ‘fuck’ in the blog entry.

    Looking forward to your entries, Anatoly.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
    He meant "faggots", 1 use of that above.

    Protip: Everybody is a fag on the internet: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Fag ;)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • 0% Libertarian. Guess that’s what the commenters are for.

    There is no left or right, only statists and anarchists.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Whoa, what's up with that f-bomb?

    I'm against the wholesale mainstreaming of homosexuality, but I'm more against the mainstreaming of hatred.

    I’m the son of Russian immigrant parents being persecuted for my traditional Eastern Slavic beliefs and gopnik colloquialisms. Please check your Anglo privilege and cut out the yanksplaining. #RussianLivesMatter

    Read More
    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Glad to see you back!

    Also, Unz.com is not a place to be PC. If you are easily offended go read the huffingtonpost.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Whoa, what’s up with that f-bomb?

    I’m against the wholesale mainstreaming of homosexuality, but I’m more against the mainstreaming of hatred.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    I'm the son of Russian immigrant parents being persecuted for my traditional Eastern Slavic beliefs and gopnik colloquialisms. Please check your Anglo privilege and cut out the yanksplaining. #RussianLivesMatter
    , @Niccolo Salo
    What f-bomb? I don't see any 'fuck' in the blog entry.

    Looking forward to your entries, Anatoly.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • So who are you and why should I read you? I am a businessman, journalist, and talentless PhotoShopper based in the SF Bay Area. My blogging career began in 2008, when I perceived an increasingly absurd discrepancy between the doom-mongering rhetoric of the Western media towards Russia, which painted it as a "weak," "dying," and...
  • And that is that for my top three Lord of the Rings filming locations in New Zealand.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Appreciation to mmy fatyer wwho statsd to mee concerning this
    webpage, thus website is in fact amazing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Wonderful, what a weblog it is! This webpage provides helpful data to us, keep it up.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The Arrow Cross proved antisemitic enough in power, collaborating heartily in anti-Jewish actions and doing some on its own. I didn’t know Teleki was strongly anti-semitic, it’s usually not mentioned when his suicide is. I don’t think Hungarian participation in Barbarossa was due to pressure, Mussolini was the one pressuring Hitler to allow Italian troops to participate, and in 1941 most thought Germany would win and win quickly, and wanted to be in on the spoils if they were in a position to be.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The problem of Horthy was that he was more moderate, and kept sacking his far right prime ministers and appointing moderate ones, only to realize a few months later that those moderate prime ministers were moving to the right with the speed of light. He didn’t sack the ailing Gömbös in 1936, because Gömbös was about to die anyway, but the next prime minister’s, Darányi’s job was to move back the country to a moderate, conservative direction, and to distance the country from Hitler and warm up relations to the West. Darányi couldn’t do that, because the country’s most important goal was the revision of the 1920 Trianon peace treaty, and he could only get it from Hitler, so he started right wing policies (like restrictions of Jews) to appease Hitler. Horthy sacked Darányi in 1938, and appointed the central banker Imrédy, whose first visit was to the country’s now most important partner, Germany. (The only country besides the USSR which was prepared to offer anything to Hungary, and the USSR was deemed off limits to the Hungarian political class after the horrors of the 1919 communist dictatorship in Hungary.) Imrédy during his visit in Germany converted to National Socialism (even though he had a Jewish great-grandmother himself). Horthy managed to dig up Imrédy’s Jewish ancestor to pressure him to resignation in 1939, and his successor count Teleki was more successful, even though he was a bloodthirsty anti-Semite himself. Teleki wanted to get rid of the Jews, but he hated the Germans even more (including Hungary’s own Ethnic German minority), and was also an Anglophile (because of how the British aristocracy kept itself above the working classes at home and above the riff-raff in the Empire) and so he kept his distance from Hitler, but by spring 1941 his policies failed in the face of increasing German pressure, so he committed suicide. His successor, Bárdossy was more of a civil servant than a politician, so he just plunged the country into Feldzug Barbarossa without giving it too much thought. (It must be noted that according to newer research this was Horthy’s decision. Not that there was much of a decision, the Germans ruled Europe, and they were pressuring Hungary anyway.)

    This is how the ruling party became increasingly dominated by its far right factions, and after 1939 it was basically impossible to reverse. Besides there were some independent far right parties, of which the Arrow Cross was the most popular, but others (like Imrédy’s party formed after his resignation) were also there, and they were included in the government in the spring and summer of 1944. They were still included after October 1944, when the Arrow Cross became the dominant political party. By late November 1944 they started the evacuation of Budapest, which caused chaos, and by Christmas 1944 Budapest was encircled by Soviet troops. There was still a government with some limited ability to influence things until they fled to Austria in late March 1945.

    Sorry for straying off topic.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Steve
    Horthy did not intend, as you say, to wipe out the Jews, but he was complicit to some degree in the export of the provincial Jews to the camps, ostensibly (and partly in fact) for war labor. He only really stood up (a bit late) for the Budapest Jews who were regarded as more integrated. He was otherwise a fairly conventional reactionary nationalist who collaborated with Hitler politically for Hungarian ends. But of course Hungary too had its own hardline anti-semitic fascists in the Arrow Cross, who killed quite a few Jews on their own when they got the chance.

    As for Franco, he did preside over the mass extermination by shooting mostly of an estimated several hundred thousand 'Reds' (and anarchists), both during and after the civil war. There is even a recent book on it called Franco's Holocaust I think. Presumably he might have done something similar in Africa if he got the chance (or 'saw the need'). But otherwise he kept his head down.

    Mussolini was the closest to Hitler on the 'fascist' side, issuing extremely ruthless orders in Africa especially, but also Italy and the Balkans, and approving at times of Hitler's measures to the Jews. He also embarked on several aggressions of his own. It was mainly Italian military incompetence that limited his opportunities to rival Hitler in scale.

    Hungary too had its own hardline anti-semitic fascists in the Arrow Cross, who killed quite a few Jews on their own when they got the chance.

    Yes, but they aren’t respected by anybody in Hungary, except perhaps a few skinheads here and there. The story is still a bit more nuanced than that, though.

    Actually the Arrow Cross was not that hardline anti-Semitic, although their program called for the resettlement of Jews (all Jews) in Palestine. Their leader thought that Jews are parasites among the nations, but that they could be redeemed by being given their own country. A point of view that even some Zionists could subscribe to.

    There were no opinion polls done at the time, but it seems almost sure that the Arrow Cross lost most of its support by 1944 (they were a popular opposition party in 1939, especially popular among the formerly social democratic industrial working classes), even many of their important supporters and leaders deserted them. In 1944 when the German troops occupied Hungary, the new government included all of the (more mainstream) far right parties, but not the Arrow Cross Party, because the Germans didn’t deem them reliable (or even smart enough) to run the country.

    So when Horthy tried to change sides in October 1944, the Germans finally accepted the Arrow Cross as their last resort, but the party had a shortage of activists. So they accepted many other people – people from the other far right parties (who despised them and thought they were dumb proles, and the hardly sympathetic feelings were reciprocated by the arrow cross activists), but also a lot of people from the criminal underclass. A lot of criminals could get out of prison if they joined the freshly organized Arrow Cross militia, and a large number of them did, and immediately started committing atrocities. The leaders at first didn’t care at all (they were happy they were addressed “Your Excellency” or something), later on they started to realize that the war was just about to be lost and that they were doing bad things for which they will be punished within a few months. So they tried to stop the excesses, but with limited success – it was the Red Army that put an end to the Arrow Cross militias’ reign of terror. One Hungarian writer wrote ironically at the end of 1944 that all of the Hungarian upper classes were awaiting the Red Army to restore law, order and private property. This was of course a bit of an exaggeration, but even to many people on the far right the Arrow Cross (which was essentially a working class party) was not much of an improvement over the communists.

    But now they get most of the bad publicity, when in fact they were in some sense the most moderate (least anti-Semitic) party of the far right. They were mostly socially radical, railing against the aristocracy, nobility, the bourgeoisie, and also against the Jews. They were ideologically probably closest to the left wing of the NSDAP and the SA, like the Strasser brothers, not too obsessed about Jews, more obsessed about social injustice.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Steve
    Horthy did not intend, as you say, to wipe out the Jews, but he was complicit to some degree in the export of the provincial Jews to the camps, ostensibly (and partly in fact) for war labor. He only really stood up (a bit late) for the Budapest Jews who were regarded as more integrated. He was otherwise a fairly conventional reactionary nationalist who collaborated with Hitler politically for Hungarian ends. But of course Hungary too had its own hardline anti-semitic fascists in the Arrow Cross, who killed quite a few Jews on their own when they got the chance.

    As for Franco, he did preside over the mass extermination by shooting mostly of an estimated several hundred thousand 'Reds' (and anarchists), both during and after the civil war. There is even a recent book on it called Franco's Holocaust I think. Presumably he might have done something similar in Africa if he got the chance (or 'saw the need'). But otherwise he kept his head down.

    Mussolini was the closest to Hitler on the 'fascist' side, issuing extremely ruthless orders in Africa especially, but also Italy and the Balkans, and approving at times of Hitler's measures to the Jews. He also embarked on several aggressions of his own. It was mainly Italian military incompetence that limited his opportunities to rival Hitler in scale.

    That’s not counting the Japanese, who lacked a single responsible leader overall, but did commit some massive slaughters, in China especially, including by biological warfare, and outright massacre as at Nanjing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @reiner Tor

    Orban’s Hungary recently built a statue to Admiral Horthy
     
    There are a few small statues and busts of Horthy in the country, in Budapest one was erected by a Calvinist parish led by a nationalist preacher, in the garden of their church building (amidst a strong campaign against it in the press and not least of all within the Reformed Church). And there are a few in some small townships or villages led by nationalist mayors. I'm personally only aware of one such statue, in a village called Csókakő. But it has nothing to do with Orbán or the government. Hungarian school curriculum still doesn't paint Horthy too favorably, he is held at least partly responsible for both the White Terror of 1919-20 and the deportation of Jews in 1944.

    Moreover, I think it's preposterous to compare Admiral Horthy (or Franco) to Stalin or Hitler. Horthy never intended to commit mass murder, unlike Stalin or Hitler. In 1919-20, he allowed the White Terror to happen (although he didn't like the excesses, just like the majority of Hungarians at the time, he thought that after the months of Red Terror some kind of semi-legal retribution was necessary), but for example 1942-44 he resisted German requests to send Hungarian Jewry to its death. He bluntly told Hitler Jews were already restricted in Hungary, but he cannot just cub them to death. But in 1944 Hitler occupied Hungary and convinced the ailing 76-year-old Horthy not to resign, and instead appoint a pro-German government (though Horthy resisted the German proposal for the prime minister, and the Germans had to settle for a compromise in the person of a retired general), which then promptly deported most Jews from Hungary. By the end of June the Germans pulled out more than half of their troops (because a small incident called the Invasion of Normandy forced them to), and Horthy halted the deportations by deploying his loyal tank division. He tried to organize a separate peace (and a coup against the pro-German elements in his own government), but failed miserably in October 1944 (he made so many amateurish mistakes that probably a five-year-old child would make less), so Hungary stuck on the side of the Germans (unlike our rival Romania, where by the way a few statues of Antonescu were also erected here and there).

    Horthy could be said to be directly responsible for the country's entrance to the war on Germany's side (I hardly doubt anybody else could have avoided that without the Germans quickly occupying the country, and then proceeding to kill all and not just 70% of the Jews therein), for the deportation of the Jews (he could have resisted more efficiently, but he thought by allowing that to happen he could regain Hitler's trust and so he could organize a coup against the Germans when the front arrives at the borders - in retrospect we know his separate peace attempt failed miserably, but he couldn't know that in spring 1944 already), and before all these for the White Terror in 1919-20, which was a wave of semi-legal or outright illegal killings by martial courts set up by a militia led by Horthy, and whose targets were sometimes not only communists but also some other leftists and sometimes just ordinary citizens being caught in the net. Of course the militia (the Nemzeti Hadsereg or National Army) was not fully under Horthy's control, and he was probably more dependent on his subordinate commanders than they were on him, so he let them do as they pleased until he managed to have himself elected regent. These are bad things, but mostly only because he was on power during very difficult times. He came to power right after the country lost the bloodiest war in modern history and experienced a revolution leading to a bloody communist dictatorship, and then as he got very old, the Second World War just happened. I don't think there are many morally perfect geniuses who could have led the country to a significantly better outcome. So of course Horthy, even if imperfect, was neither a Hitler nor a Stalin.

    Otherwise I personally think the German self-loathing is a sickness which needs to be eradicated, and not exported to other countries like Russia.

    Sorry for the repetitions, I don't have time to edit.

    Horthy did not intend, as you say, to wipe out the Jews, but he was complicit to some degree in the export of the provincial Jews to the camps, ostensibly (and partly in fact) for war labor. He only really stood up (a bit late) for the Budapest Jews who were regarded as more integrated. He was otherwise a fairly conventional reactionary nationalist who collaborated with Hitler politically for Hungarian ends. But of course Hungary too had its own hardline anti-semitic fascists in the Arrow Cross, who killed quite a few Jews on their own when they got the chance.

    As for Franco, he did preside over the mass extermination by shooting mostly of an estimated several hundred thousand ‘Reds’ (and anarchists), both during and after the civil war. There is even a recent book on it called Franco’s Holocaust I think. Presumably he might have done something similar in Africa if he got the chance (or ‘saw the need’). But otherwise he kept his head down.

    Mussolini was the closest to Hitler on the ‘fascist’ side, issuing extremely ruthless orders in Africa especially, but also Italy and the Balkans, and approving at times of Hitler’s measures to the Jews. He also embarked on several aggressions of his own. It was mainly Italian military incompetence that limited his opportunities to rival Hitler in scale.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve
    That's not counting the Japanese, who lacked a single responsible leader overall, but did commit some massive slaughters, in China especially, including by biological warfare, and outright massacre as at Nanjing.
    , @reiner Tor

    Hungary too had its own hardline anti-semitic fascists in the Arrow Cross, who killed quite a few Jews on their own when they got the chance.
     
    Yes, but they aren't respected by anybody in Hungary, except perhaps a few skinheads here and there. The story is still a bit more nuanced than that, though.

    Actually the Arrow Cross was not that hardline anti-Semitic, although their program called for the resettlement of Jews (all Jews) in Palestine. Their leader thought that Jews are parasites among the nations, but that they could be redeemed by being given their own country. A point of view that even some Zionists could subscribe to.

    There were no opinion polls done at the time, but it seems almost sure that the Arrow Cross lost most of its support by 1944 (they were a popular opposition party in 1939, especially popular among the formerly social democratic industrial working classes), even many of their important supporters and leaders deserted them. In 1944 when the German troops occupied Hungary, the new government included all of the (more mainstream) far right parties, but not the Arrow Cross Party, because the Germans didn't deem them reliable (or even smart enough) to run the country.

    So when Horthy tried to change sides in October 1944, the Germans finally accepted the Arrow Cross as their last resort, but the party had a shortage of activists. So they accepted many other people - people from the other far right parties (who despised them and thought they were dumb proles, and the hardly sympathetic feelings were reciprocated by the arrow cross activists), but also a lot of people from the criminal underclass. A lot of criminals could get out of prison if they joined the freshly organized Arrow Cross militia, and a large number of them did, and immediately started committing atrocities. The leaders at first didn't care at all (they were happy they were addressed "Your Excellency" or something), later on they started to realize that the war was just about to be lost and that they were doing bad things for which they will be punished within a few months. So they tried to stop the excesses, but with limited success - it was the Red Army that put an end to the Arrow Cross militias' reign of terror. One Hungarian writer wrote ironically at the end of 1944 that all of the Hungarian upper classes were awaiting the Red Army to restore law, order and private property. This was of course a bit of an exaggeration, but even to many people on the far right the Arrow Cross (which was essentially a working class party) was not much of an improvement over the communists.

    But now they get most of the bad publicity, when in fact they were in some sense the most moderate (least anti-Semitic) party of the far right. They were mostly socially radical, railing against the aristocracy, nobility, the bourgeoisie, and also against the Jews. They were ideologically probably closest to the left wing of the NSDAP and the SA, like the Strasser brothers, not too obsessed about Jews, more obsessed about social injustice.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • You are missing my point, which is indeed that ALL nations should admit the full extent of their past, and I argue to that effect often, I have criticized the brits on this a lot for example. I will even add to your point about their empire – the railways were not gifted, but charged at high interest via bonds to the “Government of India”, ie the British ruled Indian taxpayers, as were a number of foreign wars in places like China and even Africa, when units of the British run “Indian Army” were employed. Two good sources on this and the famines are Mukherjee’s Churchill’s Secret War, and Davis’ Late Victorian Holocausts. To be fair, recently a lot of concealed archives were admitted to, and are being gradually released, though too slowly, and only after weeding etc. But it’s better than nothing.

    As to Russia, sure she can just play the old game like the others, my point is that if so then nothing will change, but if Russia joins Germany in pushing for the full truth, then it’s a game-changer. I am sure that Putin et al know this already, he is a smart guy for sure, but hold back for political reasons, thinking there’s more to lose than gain, and hoping to keep up the regular game with ‘our partners’. Well how is that working out, not so well. But get it – as long as Russia holds back on history, it can’t shift the others either, because it’s mutual silence on embarrassing facts. Only be coming fully clean can one then say to the others with real effect, “now it’s your turn”. If Russia won’t even follow Germany who has led, then too bad, for everyone. But until it happens, it’s just the same old rotten game, day in day out, year after year, decade after decade, century after century, and in the meantime maybe the whole world will be blown up, because no one (other than the Germans) were willing to admit the truth and draw the inevitable conclusions.

    It’s a major issue for the world, in the end.

    And no begging required, just a cool, serious and honest approach to the truth of history, instead of the current wall of propaganda and half-lies at least (by almost all except Germany) that is so twisted that even the leaders do not grasp reality very much, but operate in a semi-fantasy world, but with real nukes in the silos and subs.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mariusz
    Why should Russians apologise for the communists who enslaved and killed millions of their people? When I see the American and British* governments apologise for their numerous modern-day invasions and their colonial legacy, I'll see your point with a little validity. Perhaps you view Russia as a wartime loser, thus responsibility to beg for forgiveness should be placed on her? I assure you again, those days are long over.


    You point out that the Russians assumed the USSR's role/responsibility (but conveniently forget she took on Soviet monetary debt and otherwise), while Britain has surely sugar-coated her not-so-altruistic role as an empire. Perhaps it is time for all nations to open their archives - not just the evil, red commies who are hiding underneath my bed :)


    Let's, for example, look at the British empire, as I am well aware of how she still champions her history as one where she brought "civilisation" to those who were conquered and enslaved. One well noted example was how the Brits "gifted" India with their railways. Of course, they don't mention the part about the very same railways used almost solely to transfer Indian goods to the seaports which led straight to Old Blighty! The Indian people saw no wealth for themselves, instead living in tattered rags. In fact, ever since Britain had stepped foot on the subcontinent, it had seen innumerable horrors - either being taxed to starvation (see Bengal Famine 1770) or starved to death to feed British troops around the world (see Bengal famine 1943, widely associated with Churchill's personal racial policies against the Indian people). So, to Steve, who expects the Russians to open their vaults and "accept" history, why shouldn't the British do the same? Tens of millions dead, and not a footnote in British history. One would equate that to Stalinism, no?


    Now that was just the tip of a rather enormous colonial iceberg. I am still waiting for Britain to apologise to India and the African continent. When will we have the endless articles about the genocide of the First Nation people or the Aborigines? Does the British government talk about the plight of the Chagos Islanders who'd been entirely deported (as recently as 1973) from their own island so the Brits could build a big fat military base there? Are we also to expect Britain to return the stolen Koh-i-noor which bejewels the royal crown as a reparation for the above crimes? Not anytime soon, I presume.


    *The Anglo Saxon media is the most rabid when it comes to Russian (and more recently Chinese) "historical faults", hence my use of the UK as a comparison.


    (Btw, thank you to Mr Karlin for the links your provided earlier. I eagerly look forward to reading them)

    You are missing my point, which is indeed that ALL nations should admit the full extent of their past, and I argue to that effect often, I have criticized the brits on this a lot for example. I will even add to your point about their empire – the railways were not gifted, but charged at high interest via bonds to the “Government of India”, ie the British ruled Indian taxpayers, as were a number of foreign wars in places like China and even Africa, when units of the British run “Indian Army” were employed. Two good sources on this and the famines are Mukherjee’s Churchill’s Secret War, and Davis’ Late Victorian Holocausts. To be fair, recently a lot of concealed archives were admitted to, and are being gradually released, though too slowly, and only after weeding etc. But it’s better than nothing.

    As to Russia, sure she can just play the old game like the others, my point is that if so then nothing will change, but if Russia joins Germany in pushing for the full truth, then it’s a game-changer. I am sure that Putin et al know this already, he is a smart guy for sure, but hold back for political reasons, thinking there’s more to lose than gain, and hoping to keep up the regular game with ‘our partners’. Well how is that working out, not so well. But get it – as long as Russia holds back on history, it can’t shift the others either, because it’s mutual silence on embarrassing facts. Only be coming fully clean can one then say to the others with real effect, “now it’s your turn”. If Russia won’t even follow Germany who has led, then too bad, for everyone. But until it happens, it’s just the same old rotten game, day in day out, year after year, decade after decade, century after century, and in the meantime maybe the whole world will be blown up, because no one (other than the Germans) were willing to admit the truth and draw the inevitable conclusions.

    It’s a major issue for the world, in the end.

    And no begging required, just a cool, serious and honest approach to the truth of history, instead of the current wall of propaganda and half-lies at least (by almost all except Germany) that is so twisted that even the leaders do not grasp reality very much, but operate in a semi-fantasy world, but with real nukes in the silos and subs.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Steve
    The Communists are the worst certainly, but there is SOME denial and minimization from others, nationalists for example. I agree there is some unjustifiable exaggeration, like claims of 80 million (though not far off if you include China and the others too), but now I see the attempt to reduce it to 10 million or less, which is also false. The famine was also in the areas you mention, though the Kuban also had many Ukrainians, and it was in those areas that additional measures of repression were taken to aggravate things, like blocking emigration and returning starving people to their villages by force, so along with the executions etc and Stalin's desire to smash Ukrainian nationalism an argument can be made (though not 100% proven to everyone's satisfaction) that it was genocide, albeit of a more indirect route than say the Holocaust. And the the fact that many Kazakhs and some Russians died does not mean the Ukrainians were not targeted specially to some degree, by Stalin and his cronies, many not Russian of course.

    I agree also that Germany is the exception, and Russia far from alone in its approach, but Russia expects and demands even that Germany act so, and why should Russia excuse itself by the shortcomings of the others? If Russia really stood up for the truth however painful and exceptional then it would earn a lot more respect from many, even if some swine would try and exploit it for propaganda ends, and two key nations doing it would be a big advance, and able to put a lot more pressure on the rest, by example and advocacy. As long as Russia holds back, the lies and denials worldwide just multiply, the Turks Italians Japanese etc etc get away with it, and we get nowhere really except for Germany to be everybody's punching bag, even while getting some occasional praise for being honest. When Russia comes really clean (and that needs more than some Solzhenitsyn study and the like - he did become a nationalist and supporter of Putin after all), things will change, until then, we have the same old rotten game on and on. And Russia will never really win Germans (and some others) over by playing such a game anyway, Russia is still holding a lot of the German archives too, and basically saying "you Fritzes can take the heat for history while we will play the innocent mostly along with the rest of the liars". Not good, and not effective in the long run, I observe that the more Stalin and co are rehabilitated, the more isolated from the West at least Russia becomes, and reliant on questionable allies who whilst economically useful, are culturally rather alien, with incompatible agendas in some ways (of course as is the US too in its way, but not so much the Europeans).

    Why should Russians apologise for the communists who enslaved and killed millions of their people? When I see the American and British* governments apologise for their numerous modern-day invasions and their colonial legacy, I’ll see your point with a little validity. Perhaps you view Russia as a wartime loser, thus responsibility to beg for forgiveness should be placed on her? I assure you again, those days are long over.

    You point out that the Russians assumed the USSR’s role/responsibility (but conveniently forget she took on Soviet monetary debt and otherwise), while Britain has surely sugar-coated her not-so-altruistic role as an empire. Perhaps it is time for all nations to open their archives – not just the evil, red commies who are hiding underneath my bed :)

    Let’s, for example, look at the British empire, as I am well aware of how she still champions her history as one where she brought “civilisation” to those who were conquered and enslaved. One well noted example was how the Brits “gifted” India with their railways. Of course, they don’t mention the part about the very same railways used almost solely to transfer Indian goods to the seaports which led straight to Old Blighty! The Indian people saw no wealth for themselves, instead living in tattered rags. In fact, ever since Britain had stepped foot on the subcontinent, it had seen innumerable horrors – either being taxed to starvation (see Bengal Famine 1770) or starved to death to feed British troops around the world (see Bengal famine 1943, widely associated with Churchill’s personal racial policies against the Indian people). So, to Steve, who expects the Russians to open their vaults and “accept” history, why shouldn’t the British do the same? Tens of millions dead, and not a footnote in British history. One would equate that to Stalinism, no?

    Now that was just the tip of a rather enormous colonial iceberg. I am still waiting for Britain to apologise to India and the African continent. When will we have the endless articles about the genocide of the First Nation people or the Aborigines? Does the British government talk about the plight of the Chagos Islanders who’d been entirely deported (as recently as 1973) from their own island so the Brits could build a big fat military base there? Are we also to expect Britain to return the stolen Koh-i-noor which bejewels the royal crown as a reparation for the above crimes? Not anytime soon, I presume.

    *The Anglo Saxon media is the most rabid when it comes to Russian (and more recently Chinese) “historical faults”, hence my use of the UK as a comparison.

    (Btw, thank you to Mr Karlin for the links your provided earlier. I eagerly look forward to reading them)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve
    You are missing my point, which is indeed that ALL nations should admit the full extent of their past, and I argue to that effect often, I have criticized the brits on this a lot for example. I will even add to your point about their empire - the railways were not gifted, but charged at high interest via bonds to the "Government of India", ie the British ruled Indian taxpayers, as were a number of foreign wars in places like China and even Africa, when units of the British run "Indian Army" were employed. Two good sources on this and the famines are Mukherjee's Churchill's Secret War, and Davis' Late Victorian Holocausts. To be fair, recently a lot of concealed archives were admitted to, and are being gradually released, though too slowly, and only after weeding etc. But it's better than nothing.

    As to Russia, sure she can just play the old game like the others, my point is that if so then nothing will change, but if Russia joins Germany in pushing for the full truth, then it's a game-changer. I am sure that Putin et al know this already, he is a smart guy for sure, but hold back for political reasons, thinking there's more to lose than gain, and hoping to keep up the regular game with 'our partners'. Well how is that working out, not so well. But get it - as long as Russia holds back on history, it can't shift the others either, because it's mutual silence on embarrassing facts. Only be coming fully clean can one then say to the others with real effect, "now it's your turn". If Russia won't even follow Germany who has led, then too bad, for everyone. But until it happens, it's just the same old rotten game, day in day out, year after year, decade after decade, century after century, and in the meantime maybe the whole world will be blown up, because no one (other than the Germans) were willing to admit the truth and draw the inevitable conclusions.

    It's a major issue for the world, in the end.

    And no begging required, just a cool, serious and honest approach to the truth of history, instead of the current wall of propaganda and half-lies at least (by almost all except Germany) that is so twisted that even the leaders do not grasp reality very much, but operate in a semi-fantasy world, but with real nukes in the silos and subs.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • This is a link to many photos including much video in Russia 1921-22, PBS documentary. USA soldiers famine relief (includes the selling of seeds story for Peter Grafstrom). If my link fails you, do a youtube search for “great famine in russia”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Peter Grafstrom says: the Us/Uk refusing to accept payment in oil gold or timber but only in grain with the deliberate intention of causing starvation.
    The 740 page book “Big Show in Bololand” recounts letters home from USA soldiers delivering food relief to Russia after WW I. By summer 1922, American kitchens were feeding eleven million Soviet citizens a day. Herbert Hoover, soon to be America’s “depression president” organized this. (But this is the 1920′s, not the 1930′s.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Peter Grafström
    Steve
    What you say about France and Russia shows that you havent read Docherty & Macgregor and are not at all familiar with 'the thesis'
    The point is the british owned/controlled both France and Russias key figures as well as the Serbian terrorists.
    Everything was in the sly brittons hands but none of it was known outside a closed circle of conspirators.
    You say the Germans were less guilty. Well yes but that's not a fair way to put it:they were completely innocent and were the last to mobilize. Germany was industrious , competitive and had everything to gain from peaceful trade. They built a navy to protect their merchant ships from the anticipated british naval blockade. Btw check out D&Ms blog with more info about how britains secret elite actually allowed war material to slip through the blockade to prolong the war for profit, knowing that to destroy the german competitor they needed a long war. The crucial mines in the west were likewise left unharmed for the same reason.
    And when you say communist atrocities are minimized you are just helping the anglosaxons to prevent cooperation between russians and germans pretending to be fair towards the germans, while its just the classical (british) divide and conquer strategy. The anglosaxons still hate the germans for the same old reason: they are industrious. But also more cooperating. Their businesses often have more constructive long term strategies, while the anglosaxons have relied more on owning, lending and insurance and such, resulting in a need to use violence and aggressive divide and conquer to prevail.
    The Sovjet union was never free from dependence of London and Wall street. The Sovjet foreign mimister Litvinenko never wrote his memoirs because he held too many secrets with respect to the influence of the London city banking cartel.
    After having used the bolshies to destroy the russian oil production resulting in restored higher prices on the world oil market, the anglosaxons eventually took over large chunks of the oil rights. Rockefeller the capitalist enemy was established in USSR.
    If you really want to be fair, the place to start is the Us/Uk oligarchy, look at the real puppeteers. The parasites creating money out of thin air, buying everybody, including many people inside the USSR. But this Us/Uk oligarchy conveniently hide everything so you go for the easy targets just like real power intends.
    You hope russias neighbours see them as a threat. Problem is both the previously invaded Chechs and the Hungarians seem to increasingly see the Us as a far more malevolent entity despite the corrupting influence of NGO's, Cia/Ned.

    Well excuse me but I have certainly read a fair bit of it, on their blog for example, along with much else. The Brits were certainly scheming in the background, an old game of theirs, but they did not control the Serbs Russians and French, rather trying to use them against Germany, as the others hoped to use Britain against Germany (and Austria-Hungary). The fact is they all saw something to gain in 1914 by ganging up on the Germanic powers, and did not expect the fight they got for it. It’s a tragedy that the Russians fell for it, even though the prizes on offer seemed enticing (eg Constantinople and the Straits, a highly tempting prospect back then). But that it what too much nationalism and self-justifying narrowness of vision can do, and Russians are not immune. I know the “anglosaxons” undermine Germany when it suits them, but so have the Russians. None have ever offered Germany a real alliance of equals, or ever come clean on their own roles against Germany in the past. Russia can’t expect Germany to ally with it they way things have gone, and especially as long as the Russians do not come fully clean on certain matters. Russia’s current approach just does not appeal to Germans other than some leftists and a right-wing nationalist fringe, but certainly not the centrist or conservative mainstream. Russia will have to change its approach to win over many Germans, who it’s true could have a common interest, and share some roots, but not as things stand, and of course can never expect Germany to sever ties with the West to join some Eurasian bloc outright, modern Germany is rooted mainly in the west now, that’s what happens when the eastern territories are taken and purged of Germans. But with a change of approach to accomodate German interests and needs, spiritually and not just materially, Germans would be a lot more willing to listen to and engage with Russia, which they have always had a fascination for, even if some idiots chose to regard the Russians as just a people to be colonised, a major failing, but one long-gone now (and based largely on the British et al colonization of other peoples like the Indians as to inspiration). But the old Sovietic line won’t do it, and will turn off others too, even if some like Orban will try to play both ends. But even he knows that the key is Germany, in Europe.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    Thank you for all the wellwishes.

    I will reply to everyone's points here, instead of individually, as that will take too many separate comments.

    @Cracker1,


    Can you explain why the political leaders of the US would think that Russia would voluntarily turn over their naval base on the Black Sea to NATO?
     
    In fairness, I think pretty much nobody was expecting a military reaction from Russia in response to the coup in Kiev. After all Russia had not mounted anything more than feeble verbal protests in response to previous NATO expansionism (Georgia could not be considered as a precedent because Saakashvili's forces had directly attacked Russian UN-backed peacekeepers).

    @Steve,


    I hope btw that you will treat crude propaganda of any sort the same way, eg the repugnant denial or minimisation of Communist atrocities that is so fashionable again, a good deal of which comes sadly from Russia once more, one reason I find it impossible to see much good in Putin regardless of some other things (and which does not bode well for the future of that nation’s intellectual development).
     
    Nobody apart from the ~20% of stalwart Communists is minimizing let alone denying the reality of Stalinist repressions. Solzhenitsyn is on Russian school syllabi for godsakes. That is discrete from vilifying all aspects of the Communist period or engaging in outright propaganda about it, such as labeling the Holodomor as a genocide against Ukrainians (an equivalent number died during the 1932-33 famine in the Russian Volga, Kuban, and North Kazakhstan), or ranting in capslocks about 80 million victims of Communism (inflated by an order of magnitude). That is also the province of ideological wingnuts; the Soviet dissident Sergey Dovlatov put it best: "After communists, most of all I hate anti-communists."

    I go into more detail on this particular topic here.


    ... and there is a pronounced tendency on the left and in Russia under Putin to minimize them, or even deny them outright in some cases, eg the Russian Communists still push the line that the Katyn et al massacres were done by the Germans, or at least not by the Communists ... which are claimed to be fake by Zyuganov’s crowd, from what I have read not so long ago.
     
    Again, the KPRF ≠ Putin.

    Until Russia does it, it is just as hypocritical as the nations it is at odds with, and more than Germany.
     
    Germany is the exception, not the rule, on such matters.

    Japanese leaders continue visiting the Yasukuni shrine. Saying what happened to the Armenians in WW1 was a genocide can get you imprisoned in Turkey. Orban's Hungary recently built a statue to Admiral Horthy. Alessandra Mussolini is a successful far right Italian politicians. Many elderly Spaniards are nostalgic for the Franco days.

    Why should Russia's attitude to its own history have to hew to the German model, instead of to the Japanese, Turkish, or even Anglo ones?

    @Mariusz,


    I’ve always thought that Russia lost much of her identity during the communist and Yeltsin era, and it does seem like the elite are attempting to build a cohesive Russian/Eurasian “identity”. It would be intriguing to see if there is any indication that such efforts are gaining fruition.
     
    I think the "must-read" article on this is Paul Robinson's Putin's Philosophy and Putin's philosopher. One of the key reasons that many Western policymakers, journalists, and even many intellectuals have difficulty grasping what Putin is about is that he doesn't fall within their traditional framework of reference which, which is a binary between "progressive" pro-Western liberalism and "retrogressive" Soviet authoritarianism.

    @Hokie,


    You’ve put a lot more thought into this than I have, but what if WE, EE, ME, and EA all converged on science and industry together, but only WE escaped Mongols. And then China got hit again with the Manchus, the Russians with the Crimeans and Nogais, etc. And if the climate changes causes nomadic invasions, that might be another thing that somehow relates to it.
     
    This was certainly a major factor. China in particular was constantly threatened by nomads, which led to repeated imperial collapses (e.g. the southern Song, which at one point came tantalizingly close to industrialization) and the diversion of fiscal resources from potentially more productive pursuits (e.g. the scrapping of the Ming navy). Only in the gunpowder era did the advantage swing decisively to the sedentary peoples.

    That said, Western Europe also had a number of specific advantages relative to China, in particular consistently richer diets (post-Black Death at any rate), systemic outbreeding within the Hajnal line, and an alphabetic system (which made mass literacy much easier to attain and sustain). The latter in particular I am coming to suspect played a really important role. You can't meaningfully contribute to advanced science and industry if you are illiterate. While China's literacy achievements were impressive for a preindustrial society, it was in the main "narrow"; an urban fishmonger's son might know the characters for different fishes, and as such be "fish-literate," but would be unable to read, say, a political or technical pamphlet of the sort that became increasingly prevalent in the advanced areas of 17th century Europe.


    Also, I remember seeing something about modern Iraqis-Syrians being different from Iraqis-Syrians from pre-Mongol times, the Bedouin from Yemen replaced them or at least heavily influenced their bloodlines after the Mongols killed a lot of them. I remember it being some 19th century Briton.
     
    Regarding the remarkable intellectual collapse of the Muslim world, from being leaders under the Caliphate, I suspect that inbreeding depression associated with Islamization played the key role.

    Andrey Korotayev - Parallel cousin (FBD) marriage, Islamization and Arabization

    @Pseudonomyc handle,

    I don't think Putin is easily comparable to any one Tsar. That said, re-Crimea: plus ça change...


    Do you have good psychometric data for Russia? What do you think about the theories of HBDchick about cousin marriage and the Hajnal line?
     
    Psychometric data for Russia: here.

    Re-hbdchick: Greatly respect her work and think she is mostly right.

    The Communists are the worst certainly, but there is SOME denial and minimization from others, nationalists for example. I agree there is some unjustifiable exaggeration, like claims of 80 million (though not far off if you include China and the others too), but now I see the attempt to reduce it to 10 million or less, which is also false. The famine was also in the areas you mention, though the Kuban also had many Ukrainians, and it was in those areas that additional measures of repression were taken to aggravate things, like blocking emigration and returning starving people to their villages by force, so along with the executions etc and Stalin’s desire to smash Ukrainian nationalism an argument can be made (though not 100% proven to everyone’s satisfaction) that it was genocide, albeit of a more indirect route than say the Holocaust. And the the fact that many Kazakhs and some Russians died does not mean the Ukrainians were not targeted specially to some degree, by Stalin and his cronies, many not Russian of course.

    I agree also that Germany is the exception, and Russia far from alone in its approach, but Russia expects and demands even that Germany act so, and why should Russia excuse itself by the shortcomings of the others? If Russia really stood up for the truth however painful and exceptional then it would earn a lot more respect from many, even if some swine would try and exploit it for propaganda ends, and two key nations doing it would be a big advance, and able to put a lot more pressure on the rest, by example and advocacy. As long as Russia holds back, the lies and denials worldwide just multiply, the Turks Italians Japanese etc etc get away with it, and we get nowhere really except for Germany to be everybody’s punching bag, even while getting some occasional praise for being honest. When Russia comes really clean (and that needs more than some Solzhenitsyn study and the like – he did become a nationalist and supporter of Putin after all), things will change, until then, we have the same old rotten game on and on. And Russia will never really win Germans (and some others) over by playing such a game anyway, Russia is still holding a lot of the German archives too, and basically saying “you Fritzes can take the heat for history while we will play the innocent mostly along with the rest of the liars”. Not good, and not effective in the long run, I observe that the more Stalin and co are rehabilitated, the more isolated from the West at least Russia becomes, and reliant on questionable allies who whilst economically useful, are culturally rather alien, with incompatible agendas in some ways (of course as is the US too in its way, but not so much the Europeans).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mariusz
    Why should Russians apologise for the communists who enslaved and killed millions of their people? When I see the American and British* governments apologise for their numerous modern-day invasions and their colonial legacy, I'll see your point with a little validity. Perhaps you view Russia as a wartime loser, thus responsibility to beg for forgiveness should be placed on her? I assure you again, those days are long over.


    You point out that the Russians assumed the USSR's role/responsibility (but conveniently forget she took on Soviet monetary debt and otherwise), while Britain has surely sugar-coated her not-so-altruistic role as an empire. Perhaps it is time for all nations to open their archives - not just the evil, red commies who are hiding underneath my bed :)


    Let's, for example, look at the British empire, as I am well aware of how she still champions her history as one where she brought "civilisation" to those who were conquered and enslaved. One well noted example was how the Brits "gifted" India with their railways. Of course, they don't mention the part about the very same railways used almost solely to transfer Indian goods to the seaports which led straight to Old Blighty! The Indian people saw no wealth for themselves, instead living in tattered rags. In fact, ever since Britain had stepped foot on the subcontinent, it had seen innumerable horrors - either being taxed to starvation (see Bengal Famine 1770) or starved to death to feed British troops around the world (see Bengal famine 1943, widely associated with Churchill's personal racial policies against the Indian people). So, to Steve, who expects the Russians to open their vaults and "accept" history, why shouldn't the British do the same? Tens of millions dead, and not a footnote in British history. One would equate that to Stalinism, no?


    Now that was just the tip of a rather enormous colonial iceberg. I am still waiting for Britain to apologise to India and the African continent. When will we have the endless articles about the genocide of the First Nation people or the Aborigines? Does the British government talk about the plight of the Chagos Islanders who'd been entirely deported (as recently as 1973) from their own island so the Brits could build a big fat military base there? Are we also to expect Britain to return the stolen Koh-i-noor which bejewels the royal crown as a reparation for the above crimes? Not anytime soon, I presume.


    *The Anglo Saxon media is the most rabid when it comes to Russian (and more recently Chinese) "historical faults", hence my use of the UK as a comparison.


    (Btw, thank you to Mr Karlin for the links your provided earlier. I eagerly look forward to reading them)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Steve
    I said nothing about focussing on Communist atrocities per se, just not denying or minimizing them, something I see quite a lot of going on. I am fully aware of things like the famines under the British and have frequently enough pointed it out, often to Brits who deny or minimize their own historical crimes. I am also very well read on WW1 and am aware of the thesis you mention, which whilst correct in fair measure is far from the full picture. Russia and France also played a major role, along with Serbia, Austria-Hungary, and Germany, the last rather less than generally assumed however. None of that changes the fact of Communist atrocities which were on a massive scale also, extending also to Asia, and there is a pronounced tendency on the left and in Russia under Putin to minimize them, or even deny them outright in some cases, eg the Russian Communists still push the line that the Katyn et al massacres were done by the Germans, or at least not by the Communists. Even after the documents with the signatures of Stalin et al have been handed by Gorbachev to the Poles, which are claimed to be fake by Zyuganov's crowd, from what I have read not so long ago. That is outrageous and dangerous, and other examples abound. Until Russia accepts the truth of such matters, not just officially but generally, it is no surprise at all that many of Russia's neighbours still see Russia as a threat.

    Steve
    What you say about France and Russia shows that you havent read Docherty & Macgregor and are not at all familiar with ‘the thesis’
    The point is the british owned/controlled both France and Russias key figures as well as the Serbian terrorists.
    Everything was in the sly brittons hands but none of it was known outside a closed circle of conspirators.
    You say the Germans were less guilty. Well yes but that’s not a fair way to put it:they were completely innocent and were the last to mobilize. Germany was industrious , competitive and had everything to gain from peaceful trade. They built a navy to protect their merchant ships from the anticipated british naval blockade. Btw check out D&Ms blog with more info about how britains secret elite actually allowed war material to slip through the blockade to prolong the war for profit, knowing that to destroy the german competitor they needed a long war. The crucial mines in the west were likewise left unharmed for the same reason.
    And when you say communist atrocities are minimized you are just helping the anglosaxons to prevent cooperation between russians and germans pretending to be fair towards the germans, while its just the classical (british) divide and conquer strategy. The anglosaxons still hate the germans for the same old reason: they are industrious. But also more cooperating. Their businesses often have more constructive long term strategies, while the anglosaxons have relied more on owning, lending and insurance and such, resulting in a need to use violence and aggressive divide and conquer to prevail.
    The Sovjet union was never free from dependence of London and Wall street. The Sovjet foreign mimister Litvinenko never wrote his memoirs because he held too many secrets with respect to the influence of the London city banking cartel.
    After having used the bolshies to destroy the russian oil production resulting in restored higher prices on the world oil market, the anglosaxons eventually took over large chunks of the oil rights. Rockefeller the capitalist enemy was established in USSR.
    If you really want to be fair, the place to start is the Us/Uk oligarchy, look at the real puppeteers. The parasites creating money out of thin air, buying everybody, including many people inside the USSR. But this Us/Uk oligarchy conveniently hide everything so you go for the easy targets just like real power intends.
    You hope russias neighbours see them as a threat. Problem is both the previously invaded Chechs and the Hungarians seem to increasingly see the Us as a far more malevolent entity despite the corrupting influence of NGO’s, Cia/Ned.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve
    Well excuse me but I have certainly read a fair bit of it, on their blog for example, along with much else. The Brits were certainly scheming in the background, an old game of theirs, but they did not control the Serbs Russians and French, rather trying to use them against Germany, as the others hoped to use Britain against Germany (and Austria-Hungary). The fact is they all saw something to gain in 1914 by ganging up on the Germanic powers, and did not expect the fight they got for it. It's a tragedy that the Russians fell for it, even though the prizes on offer seemed enticing (eg Constantinople and the Straits, a highly tempting prospect back then). But that it what too much nationalism and self-justifying narrowness of vision can do, and Russians are not immune. I know the "anglosaxons" undermine Germany when it suits them, but so have the Russians. None have ever offered Germany a real alliance of equals, or ever come clean on their own roles against Germany in the past. Russia can't expect Germany to ally with it they way things have gone, and especially as long as the Russians do not come fully clean on certain matters. Russia's current approach just does not appeal to Germans other than some leftists and a right-wing nationalist fringe, but certainly not the centrist or conservative mainstream. Russia will have to change its approach to win over many Germans, who it's true could have a common interest, and share some roots, but not as things stand, and of course can never expect Germany to sever ties with the West to join some Eurasian bloc outright, modern Germany is rooted mainly in the west now, that's what happens when the eastern territories are taken and purged of Germans. But with a change of approach to accomodate German interests and needs, spiritually and not just materially, Germans would be a lot more willing to listen to and engage with Russia, which they have always had a fascination for, even if some idiots chose to regard the Russians as just a people to be colonised, a major failing, but one long-gone now (and based largely on the British et al colonization of other peoples like the Indians as to inspiration). But the old Sovietic line won't do it, and will turn off others too, even if some like Orban will try to play both ends. But even he knows that the key is Germany, in Europe.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    Thank you for all the wellwishes.

    I will reply to everyone's points here, instead of individually, as that will take too many separate comments.

    @Cracker1,


    Can you explain why the political leaders of the US would think that Russia would voluntarily turn over their naval base on the Black Sea to NATO?
     
    In fairness, I think pretty much nobody was expecting a military reaction from Russia in response to the coup in Kiev. After all Russia had not mounted anything more than feeble verbal protests in response to previous NATO expansionism (Georgia could not be considered as a precedent because Saakashvili's forces had directly attacked Russian UN-backed peacekeepers).

    @Steve,


    I hope btw that you will treat crude propaganda of any sort the same way, eg the repugnant denial or minimisation of Communist atrocities that is so fashionable again, a good deal of which comes sadly from Russia once more, one reason I find it impossible to see much good in Putin regardless of some other things (and which does not bode well for the future of that nation’s intellectual development).
     
    Nobody apart from the ~20% of stalwart Communists is minimizing let alone denying the reality of Stalinist repressions. Solzhenitsyn is on Russian school syllabi for godsakes. That is discrete from vilifying all aspects of the Communist period or engaging in outright propaganda about it, such as labeling the Holodomor as a genocide against Ukrainians (an equivalent number died during the 1932-33 famine in the Russian Volga, Kuban, and North Kazakhstan), or ranting in capslocks about 80 million victims of Communism (inflated by an order of magnitude). That is also the province of ideological wingnuts; the Soviet dissident Sergey Dovlatov put it best: "After communists, most of all I hate anti-communists."

    I go into more detail on this particular topic here.


    ... and there is a pronounced tendency on the left and in Russia under Putin to minimize them, or even deny them outright in some cases, eg the Russian Communists still push the line that the Katyn et al massacres were done by the Germans, or at least not by the Communists ... which are claimed to be fake by Zyuganov’s crowd, from what I have read not so long ago.
     
    Again, the KPRF ≠ Putin.

    Until Russia does it, it is just as hypocritical as the nations it is at odds with, and more than Germany.
     
    Germany is the exception, not the rule, on such matters.

    Japanese leaders continue visiting the Yasukuni shrine. Saying what happened to the Armenians in WW1 was a genocide can get you imprisoned in Turkey. Orban's Hungary recently built a statue to Admiral Horthy. Alessandra Mussolini is a successful far right Italian politicians. Many elderly Spaniards are nostalgic for the Franco days.

    Why should Russia's attitude to its own history have to hew to the German model, instead of to the Japanese, Turkish, or even Anglo ones?

    @Mariusz,


    I’ve always thought that Russia lost much of her identity during the communist and Yeltsin era, and it does seem like the elite are attempting to build a cohesive Russian/Eurasian “identity”. It would be intriguing to see if there is any indication that such efforts are gaining fruition.
     
    I think the "must-read" article on this is Paul Robinson's Putin's Philosophy and Putin's philosopher. One of the key reasons that many Western policymakers, journalists, and even many intellectuals have difficulty grasping what Putin is about is that he doesn't fall within their traditional framework of reference which, which is a binary between "progressive" pro-Western liberalism and "retrogressive" Soviet authoritarianism.

    @Hokie,


    You’ve put a lot more thought into this than I have, but what if WE, EE, ME, and EA all converged on science and industry together, but only WE escaped Mongols. And then China got hit again with the Manchus, the Russians with the Crimeans and Nogais, etc. And if the climate changes causes nomadic invasions, that might be another thing that somehow relates to it.
     
    This was certainly a major factor. China in particular was constantly threatened by nomads, which led to repeated imperial collapses (e.g. the southern Song, which at one point came tantalizingly close to industrialization) and the diversion of fiscal resources from potentially more productive pursuits (e.g. the scrapping of the Ming navy). Only in the gunpowder era did the advantage swing decisively to the sedentary peoples.

    That said, Western Europe also had a number of specific advantages relative to China, in particular consistently richer diets (post-Black Death at any rate), systemic outbreeding within the Hajnal line, and an alphabetic system (which made mass literacy much easier to attain and sustain). The latter in particular I am coming to suspect played a really important role. You can't meaningfully contribute to advanced science and industry if you are illiterate. While China's literacy achievements were impressive for a preindustrial society, it was in the main "narrow"; an urban fishmonger's son might know the characters for different fishes, and as such be "fish-literate," but would be unable to read, say, a political or technical pamphlet of the sort that became increasingly prevalent in the advanced areas of 17th century Europe.


    Also, I remember seeing something about modern Iraqis-Syrians being different from Iraqis-Syrians from pre-Mongol times, the Bedouin from Yemen replaced them or at least heavily influenced their bloodlines after the Mongols killed a lot of them. I remember it being some 19th century Briton.
     
    Regarding the remarkable intellectual collapse of the Muslim world, from being leaders under the Caliphate, I suspect that inbreeding depression associated with Islamization played the key role.

    Andrey Korotayev - Parallel cousin (FBD) marriage, Islamization and Arabization

    @Pseudonomyc handle,

    I don't think Putin is easily comparable to any one Tsar. That said, re-Crimea: plus ça change...


    Do you have good psychometric data for Russia? What do you think about the theories of HBDchick about cousin marriage and the Hajnal line?
     
    Psychometric data for Russia: here.

    Re-hbdchick: Greatly respect her work and think she is mostly right.

    Orban’s Hungary recently built a statue to Admiral Horthy

    There are a few small statues and busts of Horthy in the country, in Budapest one was erected by a Calvinist parish led by a nationalist preacher, in the garden of their church building (amidst a strong campaign against it in the press and not least of all within the Reformed Church). And there are a few in some small townships or villages led by nationalist mayors. I’m personally only aware of one such statue, in a village called Csókakő. But it has nothing to do with Orbán or the government. Hungarian school curriculum still doesn’t paint Horthy too favorably, he is held at least partly responsible for both the White Terror of 1919-20 and the deportation of Jews in 1944.

    Moreover, I think it’s preposterous to compare Admiral Horthy (or Franco) to Stalin or Hitler. Horthy never intended to commit mass murder, unlike Stalin or Hitler. In 1919-20, he allowed the White Terror to happen (although he didn’t like the excesses, just like the majority of Hungarians at the time, he thought that after the months of Red Terror some kind of semi-legal retribution was necessary), but for example 1942-44 he resisted German requests to send Hungarian Jewry to its death. He bluntly told Hitler Jews were already restricted in Hungary, but he cannot just cub them to death. But in 1944 Hitler occupied Hungary and convinced the ailing 76-year-old Horthy not to resign, and instead appoint a pro-German government (though Horthy resisted the German proposal for the prime minister, and the Germans had to settle for a compromise in the person of a retired general), which then promptly deported most Jews from Hungary. By the end of June the Germans pulled out more than half of their troops (because a small incident called the Invasion of Normandy forced them to), and Horthy halted the deportations by deploying his loyal tank division. He tried to organize a separate peace (and a coup against the pro-German elements in his own government), but failed miserably in October 1944 (he made so many amateurish mistakes that probably a five-year-old child would make less), so Hungary stuck on the side of the Germans (unlike our rival Romania, where by the way a few statues of Antonescu were also erected here and there).

    Horthy could be said to be directly responsible for the country’s entrance to the war on Germany’s side (I hardly doubt anybody else could have avoided that without the Germans quickly occupying the country, and then proceeding to kill all and not just 70% of the Jews therein), for the deportation of the Jews (he could have resisted more efficiently, but he thought by allowing that to happen he could regain Hitler’s trust and so he could organize a coup against the Germans when the front arrives at the borders – in retrospect we know his separate peace attempt failed miserably, but he couldn’t know that in spring 1944 already), and before all these for the White Terror in 1919-20, which was a wave of semi-legal or outright illegal killings by martial courts set up by a militia led by Horthy, and whose targets were sometimes not only communists but also some other leftists and sometimes just ordinary citizens being caught in the net. Of course the militia (the Nemzeti Hadsereg or National Army) was not fully under Horthy’s control, and he was probably more dependent on his subordinate commanders than they were on him, so he let them do as they pleased until he managed to have himself elected regent. These are bad things, but mostly only because he was on power during very difficult times. He came to power right after the country lost the bloodiest war in modern history and experienced a revolution leading to a bloody communist dictatorship, and then as he got very old, the Second World War just happened. I don’t think there are many morally perfect geniuses who could have led the country to a significantly better outcome. So of course Horthy, even if imperfect, was neither a Hitler nor a Stalin.

    Otherwise I personally think the German self-loathing is a sickness which needs to be eradicated, and not exported to other countries like Russia.

    Sorry for the repetitions, I don’t have time to edit.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve
    Horthy did not intend, as you say, to wipe out the Jews, but he was complicit to some degree in the export of the provincial Jews to the camps, ostensibly (and partly in fact) for war labor. He only really stood up (a bit late) for the Budapest Jews who were regarded as more integrated. He was otherwise a fairly conventional reactionary nationalist who collaborated with Hitler politically for Hungarian ends. But of course Hungary too had its own hardline anti-semitic fascists in the Arrow Cross, who killed quite a few Jews on their own when they got the chance.

    As for Franco, he did preside over the mass extermination by shooting mostly of an estimated several hundred thousand 'Reds' (and anarchists), both during and after the civil war. There is even a recent book on it called Franco's Holocaust I think. Presumably he might have done something similar in Africa if he got the chance (or 'saw the need'). But otherwise he kept his head down.

    Mussolini was the closest to Hitler on the 'fascist' side, issuing extremely ruthless orders in Africa especially, but also Italy and the Balkans, and approving at times of Hitler's measures to the Jews. He also embarked on several aggressions of his own. It was mainly Italian military incompetence that limited his opportunities to rival Hitler in scale.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Thank you for all the wellwishes.

    I will reply to everyone’s points here, instead of individually, as that will take too many separate comments.

    @Cracker1,

    Can you explain why the political leaders of the US would think that Russia would voluntarily turn over their naval base on the Black Sea to NATO?

    In fairness, I think pretty much nobody was expecting a military reaction from Russia in response to the coup in Kiev. After all Russia had not mounted anything more than feeble verbal protests in response to previous NATO expansionism (Georgia could not be considered as a precedent because Saakashvili’s forces had directly attacked Russian UN-backed peacekeepers).

    @Steve,

    I hope btw that you will treat crude propaganda of any sort the same way, eg the repugnant denial or minimisation of Communist atrocities that is so fashionable again, a good deal of which comes sadly from Russia once more, one reason I find it impossible to see much good in Putin regardless of some other things (and which does not bode well for the future of that nation’s intellectual development).

    Nobody apart from the ~20% of stalwart Communists is minimizing let alone denying the reality of Stalinist repressions. Solzhenitsyn is on Russian school syllabi for godsakes. That is discrete from vilifying all aspects of the Communist period or engaging in outright propaganda about it, such as labeling the Holodomor as a genocide against Ukrainians (an equivalent number died during the 1932-33 famine in the Russian Volga, Kuban, and North Kazakhstan), or ranting in capslocks about 80 million victims of Communism (inflated by an order of magnitude). That is also the province of ideological wingnuts; the Soviet dissident Sergey Dovlatov put it best: “After communists, most of all I hate anti-communists.”

    I go into more detail on this particular topic here.

    … and there is a pronounced tendency on the left and in Russia under Putin to minimize them, or even deny them outright in some cases, eg the Russian Communists still push the line that the Katyn et al massacres were done by the Germans, or at least not by the Communists … which are claimed to be fake by Zyuganov’s crowd, from what I have read not so long ago.

    Again, the KPRF ≠ Putin.

    Until Russia does it, it is just as hypocritical as the nations it is at odds with, and more than Germany.

    Germany is the exception, not the rule, on such matters.

    Japanese leaders continue visiting the Yasukuni shrine. Saying what happened to the Armenians in WW1 was a genocide can get you imprisoned in Turkey. Orban’s Hungary recently built a statue to Admiral Horthy. Alessandra Mussolini is a successful far right Italian politicians. Many elderly Spaniards are nostalgic for the Franco days.

    Why should Russia’s attitude to its own history have to hew to the German model, instead of to the Japanese, Turkish, or even Anglo ones?

    @Mariusz,

    I’ve always thought that Russia lost much of her identity during the communist and Yeltsin era, and it does seem like the elite are attempting to build a cohesive Russian/Eurasian “identity”. It would be intriguing to see if there is any indication that such efforts are gaining fruition.

    I think the “must-read” article on this is Paul Robinson’s Putin’s Philosophy and Putin’s philosopher. One of the key reasons that many Western policymakers, journalists, and even many intellectuals have difficulty grasping what Putin is about is that he doesn’t fall within their traditional framework of reference which, which is a binary between “progressive” pro-Western liberalism and “retrogressive” Soviet authoritarianism.

    @Hokie,

    You’ve put a lot more thought into this than I have, but what if WE, EE, ME, and EA all converged on science and industry together, but only WE escaped Mongols. And then China got hit again with the Manchus, the Russians with the Crimeans and Nogais, etc. And if the climate changes causes nomadic invasions, that might be another thing that somehow relates to it.

    This was certainly a major factor. China in particular was constantly threatened by nomads, which led to repeated imperial collapses (e.g. the southern Song, which at one point came tantalizingly close to industrialization) and the diversion of fiscal resources from potentially more productive pursuits (e.g. the scrapping of the Ming navy). Only in the gunpowder era did the advantage swing decisively to the sedentary peoples.

    That said, Western Europe also had a number of specific advantages relative to China, in particular consistently richer diets (post-Black Death at any rate), systemic outbreeding within the Hajnal line, and an alphabetic system (which made mass literacy much easier to attain and sustain). The latter in particular I am coming to suspect played a really important role. You can’t meaningfully contribute to advanced science and industry if you are illiterate. While China’s literacy achievements were impressive for a preindustrial society, it was in the main “narrow”; an urban fishmonger’s son might know the characters for different fishes, and as such be “fish-literate,” but would be unable to read, say, a political or technical pamphlet of the sort that became increasingly prevalent in the advanced areas of 17th century Europe.

    Also, I remember seeing something about modern Iraqis-Syrians being different from Iraqis-Syrians from pre-Mongol times, the Bedouin from Yemen replaced them or at least heavily influenced their bloodlines after the Mongols killed a lot of them. I remember it being some 19th century Briton.

    Regarding the remarkable intellectual collapse of the Muslim world, from being leaders under the Caliphate, I suspect that inbreeding depression associated with Islamization played the key role.

    Andrey Korotayev – Parallel cousin (FBD) marriage, Islamization and Arabization

    @Pseudonomyc handle,

    I don’t think Putin is easily comparable to any one Tsar. That said, re-Crimea: plus ça change

    Do you have good psychometric data for Russia? What do you think about the theories of HBDchick about cousin marriage and the Hajnal line?

    Psychometric data for Russia: here.

    Re-hbdchick: Greatly respect her work and think she is mostly right.

    Read More
    • Replies: @reiner Tor

    Orban’s Hungary recently built a statue to Admiral Horthy
     
    There are a few small statues and busts of Horthy in the country, in Budapest one was erected by a Calvinist parish led by a nationalist preacher, in the garden of their church building (amidst a strong campaign against it in the press and not least of all within the Reformed Church). And there are a few in some small townships or villages led by nationalist mayors. I'm personally only aware of one such statue, in a village called Csókakő. But it has nothing to do with Orbán or the government. Hungarian school curriculum still doesn't paint Horthy too favorably, he is held at least partly responsible for both the White Terror of 1919-20 and the deportation of Jews in 1944.

    Moreover, I think it's preposterous to compare Admiral Horthy (or Franco) to Stalin or Hitler. Horthy never intended to commit mass murder, unlike Stalin or Hitler. In 1919-20, he allowed the White Terror to happen (although he didn't like the excesses, just like the majority of Hungarians at the time, he thought that after the months of Red Terror some kind of semi-legal retribution was necessary), but for example 1942-44 he resisted German requests to send Hungarian Jewry to its death. He bluntly told Hitler Jews were already restricted in Hungary, but he cannot just cub them to death. But in 1944 Hitler occupied Hungary and convinced the ailing 76-year-old Horthy not to resign, and instead appoint a pro-German government (though Horthy resisted the German proposal for the prime minister, and the Germans had to settle for a compromise in the person of a retired general), which then promptly deported most Jews from Hungary. By the end of June the Germans pulled out more than half of their troops (because a small incident called the Invasion of Normandy forced them to), and Horthy halted the deportations by deploying his loyal tank division. He tried to organize a separate peace (and a coup against the pro-German elements in his own government), but failed miserably in October 1944 (he made so many amateurish mistakes that probably a five-year-old child would make less), so Hungary stuck on the side of the Germans (unlike our rival Romania, where by the way a few statues of Antonescu were also erected here and there).

    Horthy could be said to be directly responsible for the country's entrance to the war on Germany's side (I hardly doubt anybody else could have avoided that without the Germans quickly occupying the country, and then proceeding to kill all and not just 70% of the Jews therein), for the deportation of the Jews (he could have resisted more efficiently, but he thought by allowing that to happen he could regain Hitler's trust and so he could organize a coup against the Germans when the front arrives at the borders - in retrospect we know his separate peace attempt failed miserably, but he couldn't know that in spring 1944 already), and before all these for the White Terror in 1919-20, which was a wave of semi-legal or outright illegal killings by martial courts set up by a militia led by Horthy, and whose targets were sometimes not only communists but also some other leftists and sometimes just ordinary citizens being caught in the net. Of course the militia (the Nemzeti Hadsereg or National Army) was not fully under Horthy's control, and he was probably more dependent on his subordinate commanders than they were on him, so he let them do as they pleased until he managed to have himself elected regent. These are bad things, but mostly only because he was on power during very difficult times. He came to power right after the country lost the bloodiest war in modern history and experienced a revolution leading to a bloody communist dictatorship, and then as he got very old, the Second World War just happened. I don't think there are many morally perfect geniuses who could have led the country to a significantly better outcome. So of course Horthy, even if imperfect, was neither a Hitler nor a Stalin.

    Otherwise I personally think the German self-loathing is a sickness which needs to be eradicated, and not exported to other countries like Russia.

    Sorry for the repetitions, I don't have time to edit.

    , @Steve
    The Communists are the worst certainly, but there is SOME denial and minimization from others, nationalists for example. I agree there is some unjustifiable exaggeration, like claims of 80 million (though not far off if you include China and the others too), but now I see the attempt to reduce it to 10 million or less, which is also false. The famine was also in the areas you mention, though the Kuban also had many Ukrainians, and it was in those areas that additional measures of repression were taken to aggravate things, like blocking emigration and returning starving people to their villages by force, so along with the executions etc and Stalin's desire to smash Ukrainian nationalism an argument can be made (though not 100% proven to everyone's satisfaction) that it was genocide, albeit of a more indirect route than say the Holocaust. And the the fact that many Kazakhs and some Russians died does not mean the Ukrainians were not targeted specially to some degree, by Stalin and his cronies, many not Russian of course.

    I agree also that Germany is the exception, and Russia far from alone in its approach, but Russia expects and demands even that Germany act so, and why should Russia excuse itself by the shortcomings of the others? If Russia really stood up for the truth however painful and exceptional then it would earn a lot more respect from many, even if some swine would try and exploit it for propaganda ends, and two key nations doing it would be a big advance, and able to put a lot more pressure on the rest, by example and advocacy. As long as Russia holds back, the lies and denials worldwide just multiply, the Turks Italians Japanese etc etc get away with it, and we get nowhere really except for Germany to be everybody's punching bag, even while getting some occasional praise for being honest. When Russia comes really clean (and that needs more than some Solzhenitsyn study and the like - he did become a nationalist and supporter of Putin after all), things will change, until then, we have the same old rotten game on and on. And Russia will never really win Germans (and some others) over by playing such a game anyway, Russia is still holding a lot of the German archives too, and basically saying "you Fritzes can take the heat for history while we will play the innocent mostly along with the rest of the liars". Not good, and not effective in the long run, I observe that the more Stalin and co are rehabilitated, the more isolated from the West at least Russia becomes, and reliant on questionable allies who whilst economically useful, are culturally rather alien, with incompatible agendas in some ways (of course as is the US too in its way, but not so much the Europeans).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Good to see you back at blogging. I have always enjoyed your type of blogging which respects truth or fact with very little ideology influence.

    Honestly, I believe ideology just modern version of religion. Like religion, ideology is intended for average folk who can not figure out truth on their own. Like religion, it for manipulation of mass; opium for the mass, ect.

    The moderation policy is very much on the target. There is no absolute `freedom of speech’. Arguing with idiots is waste of time and space. Some of these folk even do not understand basic high school math or physics. You can imagine their mental ability (or g or IQ) clearly is not appropriate for intelligent work or truth finding debate. At end, this indicates that Greek democracy or universal suffrage might be inferior to Roman Republican system with elite senators rule. Let mob to make decision is pretty scary.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mariusz
    I eagerly look forward to your postings Mr Karlin. Da Russophile was a staple for me when rebutting those well propagated myths about a terminally ill Russia. I'd be quite interested to see what the consequences of Crimea's reunification (as well as the influx of Ukrainian refugees) would have on Russia's future demographic trajectory. I've always thought that Russia lost much of her identity during the communist and Yeltsin era, and it does seem like the elite are attempting to build a cohesive Russian/Eurasian "identity". It would be intriguing to see if there is any indication that such efforts are gaining fruition.


    On the point of Russia's relationship with communism, it really is a complex issue. From what I've observed, much of the favourable views of it are from the older generation, and that can be boiled down to relative economic comfort and stability. I've noticed a similar underlying sentiment in Bulgaria and even in the Czech Republic. I see very few Russians condoning communist crimes, rather opposing Russia having to bear responsibility for them. Who will apologise for the millions of Soviet citizens killed by (mostly Stalinist) communism? If grovelling and begging is a litmus of "intellectual development", then the previous poster only has to look to Yeltsin's rule to see such development at its zenith.


    Finally, as much as I've seen western outlets scream and shout over Crimea, I don't think they seriously consider that it will ever return to Ukraine. Crimea was the only jewel in this pile of rubble. The rest of Ukraine, especially now that Poroshenko has destroyed the east's industry, is proverbial cow manure. Even western energy companies are deciding to suspend operations or leave Ukraine as they do not see anything profitable in the country. Well, at least this economic headache is no longer Russia's problem, since the west have decided to take patronage of it. I'd take sanctions any day! ;)

    Quite a lot of Russians not only condone but deny Soviet crimes, according to the case in question. Stalin is hugely popular, according to polls also, and Putin’s regime whilst not denying the worst crimes has tended to encourage a climate where they are downplayed considerably, and tolerated Communist denial of some of them. This is all whilst demanding and expecting that the crimes of Nazism and its allies be trumpeted and upheld to the last degree of even Soviet propaganda (Katyn excepted, thanks only to Gorbachev’s admissions perhaps), in law also. That is not only very one-sided, but dangerous, as it leads to a victim-martyr mentality and self-righteousness that plays into actual political and geopolitical outcomes. Sure Russia suffered, but so did a lot of others, also at Russian hands, and unless that’s accepted and understood properly, then Russia will remain both misguided and viewed as a danger by neighbours especially, with some justification. No need to grovel or beg, just face the facts honestly and move on more wisely. As to responsibility, Russia was the core and mainstay of the bloc, and the inheritor of the bulk of the legacy (and documents, some of which are still not released). Germany today is only a fraction of Nazi Germany, without Austria, the Sudetenland and the eastern provinces lost to Russia and Poland, but still accepts and is expected to accept responsibility at least to a fair degree. Either Germany should be released from such a burden, or others like Russia, and Japan, Italy etc (yes even Britain and the US) accept it also, for their own histories. So far I don’t see it happening, and it’s a long time now to wait. Until Russia does it, it is just as hypocritical as the nations it is at odds with, and more than Germany.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Peter Grafström
    Steve and Mariuz want to focus on communist atrocities and Steve is worried that there isnt enough nagging about that.
    To put things in proportion it would be in order to compare with how many people the anglosaxons have kept in poverty/have been driving into poverty. I suggest at least a billion. The construction of IMF has this effect so even without centuries of constant british evil you would get that high figure.
    And how many have been driven into an early death. The late Victorian period and some decades after that led to around 40 million excessive deaths from starvation in India. Unlike the terrible british liar historians who want us to believe that starvation was simply due to the weather, it happened because the food storages were sold to the highest bidder far away.
    The reason I call them terrible is because they use history as a weapon wining about the communists not being punished like the nazis and they spread false accounts of what happened during the 30's always omitting the evil committed by Us/Uk to cause as much trouble as possible for the Sovjet union. Eg the Us/Uk refusing to accept payment in oil gold or timber but only in grain with the deliberate intention of causing starvation.
    If an honest account of britains role in history would be made they would be at least an order of magnitude worse than the communists. And since britain singlehandedly caused WWI(Macgregor & Docherty Hidden History 2013 will convince you if in doubt) and since Britain for centuries have been the main cause of terrorism and religious and secterian conflicts and still are - signs of involvement in the recent false flag in Paris - it is ridiculous to insist on beginning with communist crimes. All the more since the foreign bankers funded the bolsheviks.
    That said it would be interesting to know whats true about foreign instigated disturbances during the Sovjet period, something always attributed to paranoia of the tyrrannical leaders. But what happened, what was Trotsky's role outside USSR? There are books about in russian but it would be interesting to get some samples for nonrussians. Is it true that Trotsky created upheavals from abroad and that the inner turmoil had something to do with that?
    One would like to get the full picture.

    I said nothing about focussing on Communist atrocities per se, just not denying or minimizing them, something I see quite a lot of going on. I am fully aware of things like the famines under the British and have frequently enough pointed it out, often to Brits who deny or minimize their own historical crimes. I am also very well read on WW1 and am aware of the thesis you mention, which whilst correct in fair measure is far from the full picture. Russia and France also played a major role, along with Serbia, Austria-Hungary, and Germany, the last rather less than generally assumed however. None of that changes the fact of Communist atrocities which were on a massive scale also, extending also to Asia, and there is a pronounced tendency on the left and in Russia under Putin to minimize them, or even deny them outright in some cases, eg the Russian Communists still push the line that the Katyn et al massacres were done by the Germans, or at least not by the Communists. Even after the documents with the signatures of Stalin et al have been handed by Gorbachev to the Poles, which are claimed to be fake by Zyuganov’s crowd, from what I have read not so long ago. That is outrageous and dangerous, and other examples abound. Until Russia accepts the truth of such matters, not just officially but generally, it is no surprise at all that many of Russia’s neighbours still see Russia as a threat.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Peter Grafström
    Steve
    What you say about France and Russia shows that you havent read Docherty & Macgregor and are not at all familiar with 'the thesis'
    The point is the british owned/controlled both France and Russias key figures as well as the Serbian terrorists.
    Everything was in the sly brittons hands but none of it was known outside a closed circle of conspirators.
    You say the Germans were less guilty. Well yes but that's not a fair way to put it:they were completely innocent and were the last to mobilize. Germany was industrious , competitive and had everything to gain from peaceful trade. They built a navy to protect their merchant ships from the anticipated british naval blockade. Btw check out D&Ms blog with more info about how britains secret elite actually allowed war material to slip through the blockade to prolong the war for profit, knowing that to destroy the german competitor they needed a long war. The crucial mines in the west were likewise left unharmed for the same reason.
    And when you say communist atrocities are minimized you are just helping the anglosaxons to prevent cooperation between russians and germans pretending to be fair towards the germans, while its just the classical (british) divide and conquer strategy. The anglosaxons still hate the germans for the same old reason: they are industrious. But also more cooperating. Their businesses often have more constructive long term strategies, while the anglosaxons have relied more on owning, lending and insurance and such, resulting in a need to use violence and aggressive divide and conquer to prevail.
    The Sovjet union was never free from dependence of London and Wall street. The Sovjet foreign mimister Litvinenko never wrote his memoirs because he held too many secrets with respect to the influence of the London city banking cartel.
    After having used the bolshies to destroy the russian oil production resulting in restored higher prices on the world oil market, the anglosaxons eventually took over large chunks of the oil rights. Rockefeller the capitalist enemy was established in USSR.
    If you really want to be fair, the place to start is the Us/Uk oligarchy, look at the real puppeteers. The parasites creating money out of thin air, buying everybody, including many people inside the USSR. But this Us/Uk oligarchy conveniently hide everything so you go for the easy targets just like real power intends.
    You hope russias neighbours see them as a threat. Problem is both the previously invaded Chechs and the Hungarians seem to increasingly see the Us as a far more malevolent entity despite the corrupting influence of NGO's, Cia/Ned.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Speaking of the industrial revolution.
    I’m not saying the aspects considered by Anatholy aren’t very important, but so is fractional reserve banking and networks of conspiring financiers/freemasons-other secret societies. If you study the importance of iq – that would be the place to start. The industrial revolution happened pretty much in phase with the establishment of the privately owned BoE in 1694 and freemasonry from 1717 was definitely anglosaxon in character. There was a kabbalist flavour about it but I am not sure what conclusions to draw from that aspect – there was undoubtedly a wish to oppose the Church and science was not yet developed enough to outrule some types of magic such as turning mercury into gold. And kabbalism may seem attractive from that angle.
    Otherwise you are probably aware of some sources claiming it to be proof of the jewish hand behind freemasonry.
    So iq vs conspiratorial behaviour.
    Iq vs having networks of devious spies provoking competitors to fight wars in and among them while the master race nearly unscathed lends them money and benefits no matter which side wins.
    Iq vs cleverly concealed diplomacy.
    Anatholy’s outlook is very western. Enlightenment is considered as evident sign of progressivity – something to welcome by any friend of science.
    Webster Tarpley in Against Oligarchy gives a very interesting angle where enlightenment is placed against the renaissance with Leonardo da Vinchi and Tarpley informs that Venice invented enlightenment as a way to battle the scientific renaissance.
    Voltaire is very positively described in western literature but he was funded by Venetian intel in collaboration with the british to help crush the french monarchy.
    Iq vs countermesures against being corrupted. The venetian oligarchy had an extremely elaborate voting system to select leaders. Several successive layers making it harder to know in advance who to bribe. This indicates to me that the venetian oligarchy was accustomed to bribing other regimes and had a more robust system themselves.
    Since the venetian oligarchy was transmuted to Holland and England during the 15-17 hundreds Englands peculiar character must be sought partly against that background. The industrial revolution cannot automatically be seen as independent of the rise of BoE and Londons powerful banking cartel. And the causal order is that banking was cause and not the other way round.
    Finally BoE still doesnt publish who owned the BoE after 1694- they just publish her initial owners from that year as a curiosity. Officially the BoE was nationalized after WWII but that was apparently just a bluff and it still is privately owned with undisclosed owners, except that it’s known the royals have a share.
    Most intelligent scientific inventive characters still dont have a clue about the real nature of banking.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I’m looking forward to your blogs as all the topics you mention are of interest to me.
    Is Putin a modern Nicholas I?
    Both felt threatened by internal dissent and Western influence and adhered to the ideology of Orthodoxy, Autocracy and Nationality. Both invested a lot of money in the armed forces and both ended up antagonizing the Western powers for their actions in the Black Sea region. Could we face a Second Crimean War? (hopefully a cold war this time)
    Do you have good psychometric data for Russia? What do you think about the theories of HBDchick about cousin marriage and the Hajnal line?
    Welcome.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “I started exploring the ways in which human biological differences might have influenced history (e.g. the classic puzzle of why the Industrial Revolution began in NW Europe)”

    You’ve put a lot more thought into this than I have, but what if WE, EE, ME, and EA all converged on science and industry together, but only WE escaped Mongols. And then China got hit again with the Manchus, the Russians with the Crimeans and Nogais, etc. And if the climate changes causes nomadic invasions, that might be another thing that somehow relates to it.
    Also, I remember seeing something about modern Iraqis-Syrians being different from Iraqis-Syrians from pre-Mongol times, the Bedouin from Yemen replaced them or at least heavily influenced their bloodlines after the Mongols killed a lot of them. I remember it being some 19th century Briton.

    Interesting stuff.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Steve and Mariuz want to focus on communist atrocities and Steve is worried that there isnt enough nagging about that.
    To put things in proportion it would be in order to compare with how many people the anglosaxons have kept in poverty/have been driving into poverty. I suggest at least a billion. The construction of IMF has this effect so even without centuries of constant british evil you would get that high figure.
    And how many have been driven into an early death. The late Victorian period and some decades after that led to around 40 million excessive deaths from starvation in India. Unlike the terrible british liar historians who want us to believe that starvation was simply due to the weather, it happened because the food storages were sold to the highest bidder far away.
    The reason I call them terrible is because they use history as a weapon wining about the communists not being punished like the nazis and they spread false accounts of what happened during the 30′s always omitting the evil committed by Us/Uk to cause as much trouble as possible for the Sovjet union. Eg the Us/Uk refusing to accept payment in oil gold or timber but only in grain with the deliberate intention of causing starvation.
    If an honest account of britains role in history would be made they would be at least an order of magnitude worse than the communists. And since britain singlehandedly caused WWI(Macgregor & Docherty Hidden History 2013 will convince you if in doubt) and since Britain for centuries have been the main cause of terrorism and religious and secterian conflicts and still are – signs of involvement in the recent false flag in Paris – it is ridiculous to insist on beginning with communist crimes. All the more since the foreign bankers funded the bolsheviks.
    That said it would be interesting to know whats true about foreign instigated disturbances during the Sovjet period, something always attributed to paranoia of the tyrrannical leaders. But what happened, what was Trotsky’s role outside USSR? There are books about in russian but it would be interesting to get some samples for nonrussians. Is it true that Trotsky created upheavals from abroad and that the inner turmoil had something to do with that?
    One would like to get the full picture.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve
    I said nothing about focussing on Communist atrocities per se, just not denying or minimizing them, something I see quite a lot of going on. I am fully aware of things like the famines under the British and have frequently enough pointed it out, often to Brits who deny or minimize their own historical crimes. I am also very well read on WW1 and am aware of the thesis you mention, which whilst correct in fair measure is far from the full picture. Russia and France also played a major role, along with Serbia, Austria-Hungary, and Germany, the last rather less than generally assumed however. None of that changes the fact of Communist atrocities which were on a massive scale also, extending also to Asia, and there is a pronounced tendency on the left and in Russia under Putin to minimize them, or even deny them outright in some cases, eg the Russian Communists still push the line that the Katyn et al massacres were done by the Germans, or at least not by the Communists. Even after the documents with the signatures of Stalin et al have been handed by Gorbachev to the Poles, which are claimed to be fake by Zyuganov's crowd, from what I have read not so long ago. That is outrageous and dangerous, and other examples abound. Until Russia accepts the truth of such matters, not just officially but generally, it is no surprise at all that many of Russia's neighbours still see Russia as a threat.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “be boiled down to relative economic comfort and stability”

    This can be considered a good thing.

    I, too, am looking forward to his posts. I have read a few archives already and it appears that he is an independent thinker. That is a good thing as well.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I eagerly look forward to your postings Mr Karlin. Da Russophile was a staple for me when rebutting those well propagated myths about a terminally ill Russia. I’d be quite interested to see what the consequences of Crimea’s reunification (as well as the influx of Ukrainian refugees) would have on Russia’s future demographic trajectory. I’ve always thought that Russia lost much of her identity during the communist and Yeltsin era, and it does seem like the elite are attempting to build a cohesive Russian/Eurasian “identity”. It would be intriguing to see if there is any indication that such efforts are gaining fruition.

    On the point of Russia’s relationship with communism, it really is a complex issue. From what I’ve observed, much of the favourable views of it are from the older generation, and that can be boiled down to relative economic comfort and stability. I’ve noticed a similar underlying sentiment in Bulgaria and even in the Czech Republic. I see very few Russians condoning communist crimes, rather opposing Russia having to bear responsibility for them. Who will apologise for the millions of Soviet citizens killed by (mostly Stalinist) communism? If grovelling and begging is a litmus of “intellectual development”, then the previous poster only has to look to Yeltsin’s rule to see such development at its zenith.

    Finally, as much as I’ve seen western outlets scream and shout over Crimea, I don’t think they seriously consider that it will ever return to Ukraine. Crimea was the only jewel in this pile of rubble. The rest of Ukraine, especially now that Poroshenko has destroyed the east’s industry, is proverbial cow manure. Even western energy companies are deciding to suspend operations or leave Ukraine as they do not see anything profitable in the country. Well, at least this economic headache is no longer Russia’s problem, since the west have decided to take patronage of it. I’d take sanctions any day! ;)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve
    Quite a lot of Russians not only condone but deny Soviet crimes, according to the case in question. Stalin is hugely popular, according to polls also, and Putin's regime whilst not denying the worst crimes has tended to encourage a climate where they are downplayed considerably, and tolerated Communist denial of some of them. This is all whilst demanding and expecting that the crimes of Nazism and its allies be trumpeted and upheld to the last degree of even Soviet propaganda (Katyn excepted, thanks only to Gorbachev's admissions perhaps), in law also. That is not only very one-sided, but dangerous, as it leads to a victim-martyr mentality and self-righteousness that plays into actual political and geopolitical outcomes. Sure Russia suffered, but so did a lot of others, also at Russian hands, and unless that's accepted and understood properly, then Russia will remain both misguided and viewed as a danger by neighbours especially, with some justification. No need to grovel or beg, just face the facts honestly and move on more wisely. As to responsibility, Russia was the core and mainstay of the bloc, and the inheritor of the bulk of the legacy (and documents, some of which are still not released). Germany today is only a fraction of Nazi Germany, without Austria, the Sudetenland and the eastern provinces lost to Russia and Poland, but still accepts and is expected to accept responsibility at least to a fair degree. Either Germany should be released from such a burden, or others like Russia, and Japan, Italy etc (yes even Britain and the US) accept it also, for their own histories. So far I don't see it happening, and it's a long time now to wait. Until Russia does it, it is just as hypocritical as the nations it is at odds with, and more than Germany.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Interesting, but I would suggest one (substantial) post a day to be excessive, there is just too much else to read nowadays to have the time to absorb so much from a single blogger unless one is a real fan. Also a bit much to properly research, consider and compose. Two or three a week is enough, even for a virtuoso.

    I hope btw that you will treat crude propaganda of any sort the same way, eg the repugnant denial or minimisation of Communist atrocities that is so fashionable again, a good deal of which comes sadly from Russia once more, one reason I find it impossible to see much good in Putin regardless of some other things (and which does not bode well for the future of that nation’s intellectual development).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Can you explain why the political leaders of the US would think that Russia would voluntarily turn over their naval base on the Black Sea to NATO?

    I know stupidity is one explanation and that it cannot be ruled out, however, it seems to me that there must be a better explanation.

    I haven’t had a chance to read your archives; you may have covered this already.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I feel the time has come to bid a dignified farewell to this blog that I have lovingly labored on for many a year. Between the dopamine-fueled attractions of 140 character quickfire tweets, and the chronic lack of time for writing the far more detailed posts demanded as part and parcel of writing not one...
  • […] is the first of my promised Last Three Posts on DR. It’s been a bit more than a year since my last update on […]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    Heartbreaking ...!
    Sincerely I still remenber SO as the best blog ever...
    Anyway thank you so much for the good job and always keep writing...

    Thank you for your kind comments Alexandre.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Сдох жучок, ну и фиг с ним. Вредная была штука и никому не нужная. Туда ей и дорога

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Heartbreaking …!
    Sincerely I still remenber SO as the best blog ever…
    Anyway thank you so much for the good job and always keep writing…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    Thank you for your kind comments Alexandre.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Thanks!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I was recently honored to be invited to the World Russia Forum 2012, an annual event organized by Edward Lozansky that aims to promote US-Russia cooperation. You can read Eugene Ivanov's write-up on last year's forum here. The theme for this year will be "the role of NGOs, Public Diplomacy, and Media in formulating the...
  • independent.academia.edu

    The World Russia Forum 2012: How To Counter Media Bias Against Russia?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Just a request to readers who have blogs: please update your links to this new website (http://www.unz.com/gnxp). I've noticed that there are very few referrals to other websites coming in right now, though plenty of people are coming in via my Twitter account. Also, if you subscribe via RSS please point to http://feeds.feedburner.com/RazibKhansTotalFeed. That's the...
  • that’s fair enough. though i think ron means to extend this site beyond politics.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • GH says:

    I guess this is a good time to share a bitter truth I’ve felt since you moved to Unz — I’m much less inclined to share your articles now that you’re on a political website. Science should not be politicized, especially when you’re discussing “sensitive” and “controversial” issues frequently (erroneously or not) associated with far-right philosophies. It’s way more difficult to convince our liberal-minded peers of anything you write about if it’s coming from a political website rather than a scientific one.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • and pretty much anywhere that i post (e.g., SECULAR RIGHT). also, it keeps the RSS the same since obviously that won’t change.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • What’s the difference between feedburner and your Unz Feed? Occasional articles at Slate?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I should have never allowed myself to be talked out of it in the first place. The primary reasons are the same as before: Low activity rates, to the extent that genuine discussions are once again being overtaken by spam in terms of volume. This is in spite of substantially increased security measures since then....
  • After wading through rather unbelievable amount of german mainstream-press reports about Russia which in their one-sidedness I would not have thought was possible, I would have regretted very much if this blog would have stopped to exist. In fact I just found you now. A few funny stories, or not so – just went to my local library to find some scores of Shostakovich, where I stumbled upon a “actual books” bord. 7 books, all sounding like “Putin mad” or “Putin kaputt!?”, the latter being an original title from a famous german publisher (the book is pathetic). Our newspapers are again full of hate against Russia, just forgetting the small things the western world does….and so on. If you go out and ask people on the street about – whatever – pussy riot, Timoshenko, Chodorkovsky….you allways get an utterly uninformed blurb, coming directly from the apps of their i-phones it seems. One-sentence-knowledge, so to speak.

    Funny is that I came to this site after reading a very good entry from the blog .”the Kremlin stooge” about Timoshenko (2 years old), and the man mentioned a horrible blog called “larussophobe” (which just goes “a bit”^^ [ha ha] over the top with the same news we listen to in Europe daily, in swedish just like in german mainstream papers. I read, to write a bit too much in a first post, sometimes at a swedish peace movement, and their knowledge about Russia or Timoshenko and so on is – well, hard to believe. Nobody even seems to think about that what we are told can’t be right…It is “good against evil” again. The swedish folks, I am sure, are great people, who just are uninformed. That’s the problem at least in a uniform german and swedish and US mainstream media…

    So for once it is not “hey, I found something to learn from” the day the lights go out :-))). All the best to you, and thanks that you don’t delete the old posts, I presume there is much to learn for many here, and I am sure the interest in balanced views about Russia will not fade, quite to the opposite…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    Dear Anatoly, thanks for your effort sofar, this blog was my daily mental screensaving (along with other internet sources) and I´ll miss it, would it be possible to have a precise mention of the blog of Moreira? Best - LBazzo

    Galata, this blog will continue as it is. What Anatoly is talking about is his other project, the forum Russia Debate, which he will no longer administer and will be taken by José Moreira. The forum is at http://www.russiadebate.com, and of course you are welcome to register and post there also.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    Sorry for the delay all. I have unfortunately had a lot of other stuff during the New Year.

    I'm on it now though and hopefully the transfer can be completed this weekend and zmoreira can take over as supreme overlord.

    Dear Anatoly, thanks for your effort sofar, this blog was my daily mental screensaving (along with other internet sources) and I´ll miss it, would it be possible to have a precise mention of the blog of Moreira? Best – LBazzo

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carlo
    Galata, this blog will continue as it is. What Anatoly is talking about is his other project, the forum Russia Debate, which he will no longer administer and will be taken by José Moreira. The forum is at www.russiadebate.com, and of course you are welcome to register and post there also.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @zmoreira
    I have volunteered to take over. Hopefully we'll get the site running again soon. :)

    Sorry for the delay all. I have unfortunately had a lot of other stuff during the New Year.

    I’m on it now though and hopefully the transfer can be completed this weekend and zmoreira can take over as supreme overlord.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Dear Anatoly, thanks for your effort sofar, this blog was my daily mental screensaving (along with other internet sources) and I´ll miss it, would it be possible to have a precise mention of the blog of Moreira? Best - LBazzo
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @zmoreira
    I have volunteered to take over. Hopefully we'll get the site running again soon. :)

    Very glad to hear that! :)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Carlo
    That is really good news! Thanks José!

    Good man!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @zmoreira
    I have volunteered to take over. Hopefully we'll get the site running again soon. :)

    That is really good news! Thanks José!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Moscow Exile
    Good man!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I have volunteered to take over. Hopefully we’ll get the site running again soon. :)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carlo
    That is really good news! Thanks José!
    , @Drutten
    Very glad to hear that! :)
    , @Anatoly Karlin
    Sorry for the delay all. I have unfortunately had a lot of other stuff during the New Year.

    I'm on it now though and hopefully the transfer can be completed this weekend and zmoreira can take over as supreme overlord.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Sooo many things to discussssssss… Euromaidan conspiracy theories and yadda yadda. The olympics haven’t even started, either. I wish I could take charge of it, but I can’t. I hope somebody will. Hey, it’s not New Years yet anyway! :(

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Would it be possible to preserve this blog online without having it deleted? I find it a useful reference. Couldn’t it be mirrored for free on blogger or wordpress so that way you don’t have to worry about hosting fees and those who want to access the material here can?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says: • Website

    A pity, but inevitable.

    I don’t really see this as indicating a lack of interest in Russia or the related topics. It’s more to do with the trajectory of online debate. Most forums and blogs are struggling or beginning to struggle because the focus has moved to Twitter. That’s sad, because forums and blogs allow for more deliberative contributions.

    I sometimes feel that the more debate and discussion is democratised the more more it degenerates.

    Before the internet, to make a contribution to a debate, usually through a newspaper, magazine or journal, someone had to present their thoughts in a way that an editor would consider publishable. Then the internet came along and anyone could contribute. Except that, with blogs and forums, to attract people to your site, or to get them to read your post, it usually had to be more or less readable and cogent.

    Twitter, by contrast, allows people to just spill their guts, instantly, about any topic. There’s no price whatsoever to offering up your opinion to the masses. You don’t need to know about the topic, you don’t need to be even semi-literate and you don’t need to have something worth saying. It’s enough to have two working fingers and an electronic device.

    Some people celebrate the democratisation of debate. To be honest, while I can’t intellectually defend the sentiment, I hate it. I spend my working life and, increasingly, my leisure time, hearing ignorant people sounding off about things that they haven’t even bothered to read up about, much less understand.

    The most under-used right in the modern world is the right to shut the fuck up. You don’t know anything about the topic, you’re effectively illiterate, SHUT THE FUCK UP! Nope, now everyone’s opinion is as good as anyone else’s. I wonder are there votes to be had for a ‘Shut the fuck up’ party?

    Anyway. Season’s greetings.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I found this at the start of December. So it figures you are closing down the same month… So where do you write?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Moscow Exile
    Sorry to hear about this, but I saw it coming: who couldn't have? You were right all along and shouldn't have heeded the pleas off others not to shut it down.

    And what about “The Russian Spectrum”? Is Weiss going to have no competition?

    The only thing I regret is the quality comments that are going to be lost along with it. I’ll think of some way to preserve them e.g. by exporting/uploading an xml file with all the forum postings.

    The Russian Spectrum has, I admit, gone cold for a lack of prospects and a slowdown in my own attention to it. I haven’t given up on it however and with the reorganization of RIA it might even have more chances now.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Sorry to hear about this, but I saw it coming: who couldn’t have? You were right all along and shouldn’t have heeded the pleas off others not to shut it down.

    And what about “The Russian Spectrum”? Is Weiss going to have no competition?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    The only thing I regret is the quality comments that are going to be lost along with it. I'll think of some way to preserve them e.g. by exporting/uploading an xml file with all the forum postings.

    The Russian Spectrum has, I admit, gone cold for a lack of prospects and a slowdown in my own attention to it. I haven't given up on it however and with the reorganization of RIA it might even have more chances now.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Due to the popular outcry, my prior decision to close down the Russian politics and history forum is now formally reversed. Come on people - let's make it work. Stop spamming each other in email newsletters. Refrain from creating thousands of off-topic comments on blog posts that will get lost in the Internet's recesses as...
  • It’s back from the dead? Interesting.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @john smith
    I tried to post this comment in the Snowden thread but the website is down.

    "Frankly Russia made a mistake in giving sanctuary to Snowden and should have pushed for him to seek political asylum in Europe with the usual countries priding themselves on their asylum policy putting the pressure on them.

    Russia should never have allowed Snowden to enter Russia from Hong Kong and has absolutely nothing to gain from it that was organised and came to prominence from the hostile anti-Putin/Russian Guardian newspaper and will serve as an excuse to block US entry into the families of those involved in the Boston bombing and that of Ibragim Todashev that will force documents and hard question surrounding CIA involvement in supporting Chechen terrorist groups especially like 9/11 it lead to the Boston bombing itself that will blow open the whole facade regarding the war on terror.

    So far it has already been revealed that Uncle Ruslan worked for USAID on behalf of British/ US interests in Kazakhstan and operated a front Chechen organisation securing anti-mining boots to Bin Ladins arm trafficker through terrorist front organisation run from CIA agent Graham Fullers house who the US had been working with at least since the Balkans war when Croatian police arrested him in 93 I think and was released on appeal from a letter from a black female senator in the US."

    Bin Ladins arms trafficker was Enaam Arnaout and the black female senators name is Carol Moseley Braun who Arnaout wrote to her not the other way around who escape rather then being released on request from the senator.

    http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/case_docs/94.pdf

    It’s back up.

    The downtime was a Bluehost problem, nothing I can do about that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I tried to post this comment in the Snowden thread but the website is down.

    “Frankly Russia made a mistake in giving sanctuary to Snowden and should have pushed for him to seek political asylum in Europe with the usual countries priding themselves on their asylum policy putting the pressure on them.

    Russia should never have allowed Snowden to enter Russia from Hong Kong and has absolutely nothing to gain from it that was organised and came to prominence from the hostile anti-Putin/Russian Guardian newspaper and will serve as an excuse to block US entry into the families of those involved in the Boston bombing and that of Ibragim Todashev that will force documents and hard question surrounding CIA involvement in supporting Chechen terrorist groups especially like 9/11 it lead to the Boston bombing itself that will blow open the whole facade regarding the war on terror.

    So far it has already been revealed that Uncle Ruslan worked for USAID on behalf of British/ US interests in Kazakhstan and operated a front Chechen organisation securing anti-mining boots to Bin Ladins arm trafficker through terrorist front organisation run from CIA agent Graham Fullers house who the US had been working with at least since the Balkans war when Croatian police arrested him in 93 I think and was released on appeal from a letter from a black female senator in the US.”

    Bin Ladins arms trafficker was Enaam Arnaout and the black female senators name is Carol Moseley Braun who Arnaout wrote to her not the other way around who escape rather then being released on request from the senator.

    http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/case_docs/94.pdf

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    It's back up.

    The downtime was a Bluehost problem, nothing I can do about that.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Its failure is so stark that I hardly need post a notification on the actual site. To the extent that I visit it nowadays it is mostly just to clean spam, which is just depressing. It has not achieved critical mass, despite the initial incentives on offer, and in my experience if a forum fails...
  • Sad. )=

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Bit of a shame I must say. I started a couple of threads but with less feedback/reactions than I’d hoped for. The forum has (had…) potential IMO but yeah, the spambots were for a while the most active contributors… :(

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @mls13
    I'm kind of bummed about this. The problem I ran into with the RD was that I would check in from time to time, but rarely did I feel like I had anything particularly relevant to say... not that that stops anyone on Facebook or Twitter, of course.

    That’s the problem with forums… you really need an active “core” of people to keep the momentum going. To create new topics. If nobody is doing that, the only thing left is to observe the empty spaces – and eventually leave.

    Thanks for participating anyway mls13, I enjoyed your toe anecdote.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Scowspi
    I tried to get some culture-related discussion going. Got a few interesting replies, then it died. Since I lost interest in Russian politics and current events sometime in 2011, I couldn't really contribute in those areas.

    You certainly did. Thanks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Callum Galloway Green
    That is a shame, I enjoyed what little discussion I saw on that site. An alternative would be to get to know a site like Reddit that lets you create your own communities free of charge, of course the administrator tools are lacking but it works quite well for some people. This - http://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics - for example, is a community on reddit that focuses on the discussion of politics within the UK.

    Thanks, but I have no interest in getting involved in Reddit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Fedia Kriukov
    Coincidentally, I just finished translating something for the Russian Spectrum. I'll try to clean it up and post today.

    Well, it's unfortunate about the forum. I didn't participate, but it would've been nice if it existed. In particular, I sometimes check the Kremlin Stooge blog and see a lot of interesting discussion in a horrible format that makes it difficult to keep track of. I was hoping they'd move it to a dedicated forum, but alas...

    Maybe what should've been done to kick start he form was to post links to interesting Russia related blog posts so people can comment on the forum as well. It could grow from there. It's not like there's a lack of people talking about Russia, it's just that those discussions are very atomized and unwieldy.

    Cool, cheers. I’ll approve it first thing tomorrow.

    Could have, should have… the biggest problem perhaps was that I simply didn’t have time to personally encourage the growth of the forum. I was hoping it would flower organically.

    Completely agree about the atomized nature of the discussions. But I suppose it also reflects the atomized nature of the debate in general – and some of the participants really, really can’t stand each other. Maybe I’m just not the right person to carry through a project like that. Someone like Andy Young (of Siberian Light) would qualify and might even succeed, but he hasn’t written anything on Russia in 2 years.

    Anyway, as per the request of a few users, I’m giving the project a renewed lease of life until late September. So it’s not dead for certain… yet. Though the chances it will revive are, I’m afraid, quite bleak.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • That is a shame, I enjoyed what little discussion I saw on that site. An alternative would be to get to know a site like Reddit that lets you create your own communities free of charge, of course the administrator tools are lacking but it works quite well for some people. This – http://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics – for example, is a community on reddit that focuses on the discussion of politics within the UK.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    Thanks, but I have no interest in getting involved in Reddit.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I tried to get some culture-related discussion going. Got a few interesting replies, then it died. Since I lost interest in Russian politics and current events sometime in 2011, I couldn’t really contribute in those areas.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    You certainly did. Thanks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I’m kind of bummed about this. The problem I ran into with the RD was that I would check in from time to time, but rarely did I feel like I had anything particularly relevant to say… not that that stops anyone on Facebook or Twitter, of course.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    That's the problem with forums... you really need an active "core" of people to keep the momentum going. To create new topics. If nobody is doing that, the only thing left is to observe the empty spaces - and eventually leave.

    Thanks for participating anyway mls13, I enjoyed your toe anecdote.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.