The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / By Stephanie Savell
 All Comments / By Stephanie Savell
    I’m in my mid-thirties, which means that, after the 9/11 attacks, when this country went to war in Afghanistan and Iraq in what President George W. Bush called the “Global War on Terror,” I was still in college. I remember taking part in a couple of campus antiwar demonstrations and, while working as a waitress...
  • @jacques sheete

    If we were a less stupid country people might actually be angry that we’re now allies with al-Qaeda.
     
    If we were an even less stupid country people might actually be angry that we were once allies with Stalin and have been allies of the gangster state of Israel for decades and supporters of Zio-freaks since ~50 years before that.

    And if we were an even less stupid country people might actually be angry that we let Eastern European gangster "immigrants" and their progeny take over our banks, industry, schooling and government around a century ago.

    Appeasing those arse-wipes has earned us the contempt of nearly everyone, including wide awake 'Merkins.

    Speaking of taking over our schooling, let me recommend the book, “Credentialed to Destroy”.
    And the blog, “Invisible Serf’s Collar”.
    Very sobering stuff. Almost too much to bear.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @renfro

    Do Americans really not care? That, at least, seems to have been the judgment of the many journalists who received our press release about the report.
     
    How many Americans even know we are still in Afghanistan or Iraq...the media wont tell them.

    In “flyover” country, most of them have sons or brothers or cousins fighting over there, so plenty of Americans know. Although most of those “serving” claim they’re doing it for patriotic reasons, they’re mainly doing it for economic reasons.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Alden
    Learning about the Whiskey rebellion and the reason for the whiskey tax imposed on the frontiers people turned me against the founders forever.

    Learning about the Whiskey rebellion and the reason for the whiskey tax imposed on the frontiers people turned me against the founders forever.

    That, and the fact that a lot of the people who actually fought the war went into debt to do that and ended up losing everything because of it.

    Screwed from the get-go, and still taking a screwing for another 200+ years, yet most think they live in a democracy and enjoy “freedom.” Indebted to the gills in the interest of the rich, communistic-fascist ruling classes as well, yet “all is good.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Erebus


    I did notice that there are quite a numbers of philosophers here who could contribute to put the country on the right path.
     
    No such thing will ever happen.
     
    Well Jacques, it depends on one's definition of "philosophy". It was "Philosophers", under the rubric of "Grand Strategists", that got us into this mess, and a couple have popped up that may just get us at least part of the way out. Inertia being what it is, the latter have an uphill battle, but if one takes a broad view it looks like we may actually be past the tipping point.

    Anyhow, here's a thumbnail sketch of how/why I think we got here and who led us. Dick Cheney may have branded the "War on Terror (that) wouldn't end in our lifetime", but however happily he and they profited from it, neither he nor his friends in the MIC or Congress invented it. It takes deep-thinkers to formulate coherent ideological underpinnings for a war against no definable threat, no identified enemy, on no identifiable battlefield, or even identifiable theatre. Open-ended war anywhere, nowhere, everywhere, against everyone and no-one, is not easy to justify.

    The War on Terror is the product of a group of intellectual heavy-lifters in the bowels of the Pentagon, working on "emerging threats" and "force restructuring" under Adm. Art Cebrowski in the '90s. While it has a tangential connection to "counter-terrorism", this new type of war has everything to do with "prevent(ing) the re-emergence of a new rival", the No.1 objective of American foreign policy since Wolfowitz, and a then emerging philosophy of war best stated by one of its most vocal proponents. To whit, the War on Terror that began in Afghanistan in Oct, 2001 and would soon move to Iraq marked the "... historical tipping point--the moment when Washington [took] real ownership of strategic security in the age of globalization".

    At bottom, Globalization with American Characteristics (GAC) is the Great Project, the over-arching paradigm within which all the developed world's think-tankers and policy wonks live and work, and in which their counterparts in the developing world work to join. In the mid '90s, the recognition that American power could not itself force GAC on the entire world forced some introspection. Initially formulated under the mentorship of Cebrowski, T. P. M. Barnett went on to create his "Core-Gap" theory of how GAC could continue to develop and what use of military force would best contribute to that development.

    In a nutshell, the theory's basic tenet is that the long developing Globalization was geo-political-economic reality, an inexorable world-historical process that was born centuries ago, and America's recent ownership of that process (creating GAC) was its greatest civilizational achievement. Barnett calls it "... greatest foreign policy achievement in history – namely, the rapid and planet-wide spread of our economic source-code (aka, globalization)". The failure of so grand a vision, the vision that created and/or tuned all of the world's significant institutions, would literally mean TEOTWAWKI.

    The types of military force configurations, strategies and tactics that would best underpin and expand the spread of GAC, and ensure that it retained both its American characteristics and control came to be sold to the public under the meme “War on Terror”. 9/11 was its kick-off party.

    Alas, GAC was not quite "planet-wide" yet, and much of the world has yet to see, much less enjoy the benefits of this wonderful trend. The "Core", basically the OECD countries, are thoroughly embedded in the GAC process, but there are lots of laggards, and some may never get there. The pre-eminent function of the USM is to see to it that these laggards and outsiders, the “Gap" countries, are prevented from disrupting the process, and where possible to be brought into it. If their socio-political conditions make that difficult/impossible, they are to be broken so they can't disrupt the great world-historical trend. Whatever their status, if they have anything valuable - minerals, energy, water - these must be made available to the Core and near-Core, even if they have to be maintained in a socio-politically chaotic state while their resources are being "liberated". That is why the USM abandoned large formations and moved towards much greater use of small SF formations, drones, proxies, and why they're active in ~100 countries.

    Barnett's thinking held great sway in Washington's brain-trusts before, and in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, and continues to drive much of what we see happening. The jaw-dropping Ameri-centrism of this heady program explains the hubris, the strategic and analytic myopia, the disastrous procurement blunders, and explains completely the so-called "failures" in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and soon in a country near you.

    It also explains the security and military doctrinal documents that were recently released making explicit America's rivalry with China & Russia. Though these countries are fully embedded in Globalization per se, they wish to re-define it, replacing the Ameri-centric component with a multipolar structure that's tolerant of nations not much impressed with American "culture", however much they like the “economic source-code”. They want the baby, not the bath water, and they've developed the economic and military heft to present a serious challenge. More dangerously, they've formulated coherent visions and are executing the supporting policies that many countries previously enamoured with America's exceptionalism find attractive.

    That, of course, is anathema to the formulators and guiders of American military and geo-political doctrines. Fundamentally, these documents recognize that the East-West spread of Globalization is all but complete, but is spinning out of American control and is now at risk of being partitioned into those old spheres of influence that will again come to define the limits of American influence. They want it back, but the authors are behind the curve. Already, the East-West thrust has largely been abandoned but for some rear-guard chest beating in E. Europe, ME and the E&SCSs.

    In its place, a new North-South axis has opened in the form of migration. The Core's deep-thinkers, having recognized Russian & Chinese pre-eminence on the East-West axis, have shifted their gaze due south. A new twist in the game is afoot.

    Barnett's Core-Gap theory early in the 21st century can be read here:
    http://thomaspmbarnett.squarespace.com/globlogization/2010/8/17/blast-from-my-past-the-pentagons-new-map-2003.html#ixzz57HDXs7lh

    Barnett's more recent thinking, with thoughts on why the US won't be building any walls soon, can be read here.
    http://thomaspmbarnett.squarespace.com/globlogization/2016/2/18/americas-post-oil-grand-strategy.html#ixzz57HbsBKqW

    Thank you for the introduction to that essentially very decent American Thomas Barnett. Are you saying that he was inflential somewhere where it mattered (a) before the 2003 invasion of Iraq
    (b) before 9/11?. He got right, or potentially anyway, America’s need to have involved China (and I would add India and Russia) in sorting out the ME even before the fracking revolution made it a no brainer but he missed what I got quite explicitly right in 2003, viz. that a good outcome in Iraq (without getting out of Afghanistan) depended on America having suficient military and economic strength – which I strongly doubted – and the political stamina which I doubted even more.

    BTW because I have your attention on one of the serious issues of the last 20 years allow me to draw your attention to a National Geographic doco on another one, namely on China wherein I got an explanation for the Chinese leaders’ continuong, even increadsing, clamp down on what we would regard as harmless dissent and campaigning for more democracy. It is their fear, often as members of victim families, of what was unleashed by Mao’s Cultural Revolution which, it should be recalled, upended the Communist Party itself. To say the least Chinese history has not shown the Chinese to be less given to violence and warfare than other peoples despite a period when softheaded Westerners would think of China as just peacefully minding its own business (remember the influence of Edgar Snow anf Felix Greene?). With one reservation I buy the argument that it was the experience of the Cultural Revolution which makes the present Communist leadership unwilling to take the slightest risk of the unruly ignorant demos taking off. (An exolanation with a built in hope for change, is it not?) My reservation is based on the thought that, especially with an ageing population and so many people becoming well off, a structured democracy could be devised which might require age qualifications, inter alia, and avoid many other of the pretences about human equality that the declining West indulges. But I say that without knowing how the gestures to local self-government one used to hear about are going now, or whether the frequent protests about corruption and local party thuggery are now being listened to or stamped on.

    Australia is a country which has been able to afford a lot of democracy by good luck as well as reasonaby good management. I’m afraid it is about to prove the CCP”s fears of the masses and populism right. Despite his poor ratings agsinst the current PM, Bill Shorten, the leader of the Labor Opposition is likely to lead his crew of union backed and financed oligarchs to victory next year by simply calculating how to buy the needed votes in the crudest possible way. After all the total sense of entitlements with a bit of dishonest kidding from politicians including Greens is about 200 er cent of what is, and you won’t blame yourself for borrowing too much to buy a house in the big cities.

    Unfortunately Australia is likely to be able to finance a reduced productivity, higher tax bribe-the-voters existence for a long time so that Labor can keep on squeaking back into government. The new enterprising Chinese (especially) and Indian Australians may start by backing winners in the expected style but I would like to think they will set limits to their support of a party battening on to the lower socio-economic classes for support at the expense of business and high income earners. Hiding income and assets in Singapore and Hong Kong will still leave them a bit nervous about feral Greens forcing a leftward lurch on to Labor.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twodees Partain
    The author is a TD libtard. She isn't "politically naive", she's taking facts and using them to lead a reader to a conclusion that favors her political agenda. Holding out hope for libtards is a waste of emotion. Even if they come to reject liberalism, they will still be 'tards.

    You presume too much. I’ve found about 100 versions on line of what your TD might mean and none of them fit well. So what does it mean in your sandpit?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ximenes
    The upper middle class -- the top 20% who make all the decisions -- have become fantastically wealthy since 9/11, mostly thanks to stock market gains. This class, who do not send their sons to fight and quite often don't even know anyone in the military, is nonetheless probably vaguely aware that their wealth is somehow tied to the endless wars, and thus the blank stares the author receives at parties.

    Then there is that other class who willingly enlist in the military. They do support the wars, or at least on the level of insisting we "support the troops."

    There is no end to this until something gives. That would mean either national bankruptcy, or we run out of working class white boys to do the fighting.

    I don’t write this with any certain knowledge but your “run out of working class white boys to do the fighting” makes me wonder about your familiarity with today’s US armed forces. True, finding a fully proportionate contingent of blacks with sufficient measured cognitive ability may be difficult but my impression is that the US forces are full of people with Hispanic names, and not many of them pure descendants of blonde Visigoths.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • And there are further trillions that have simply gone missing.

    https://www.city-journal.org/html/americas-missing-money-15725.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The $6 trillion spent on the “war on terror” is $20,000 for every man, woman, and child in America; or $80,000 for a family of four. If that does not grab people’s attention, I don’t know what will.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sarah Toga
    I had noticed in recent years the shift from the Vietnam era hostility against the military to the "thank you for your service" public manners ethic.
    I wondered how our masters in Hollywood and other cultural control towers had made that huge shift and made it stick.
    TPTB were formerly rabidly anti-military, i. e., W. Clinton loathed the military, etc. BHO was no hawk. Maybe DiFi got tons of military contract $$ for the complex in SoCal.
    I label them TPTB because the Clintons have ruled and continue to rule the Democratic Party and rule the Media, since 1992.
    The national GOP is effectively a fractured nebulous non-entity.
    "Dubya" is a fool.
    Democrat pols have made the decisions we have to live with. They had about 8 years majority, free rein from 2006 to 2014 to do anything they wanted.
    The net result is ton$ of $pending, 1,000's of White volunteer soldiers killed, maimed, PTSD'd.
    And we import more hostile foreigners (so-called immigration) than ever before. Then pay them to dawdle and scheme terror violence while on welfare. As the debt piles up.
    Stupid policies all around.
    Maybe Brown U could have a stupid policies studies center. But those academics and statists could never figure out they are the biggest problem.

    It was easy for Dubya’s bosses to get him on board for Iraq. They simply told him that Saddam tried to kill his daddy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I really do believe that 1/10 part of America’s public spends (especially Army costs) go for real needs, and the rest 9/10 are being eaten by the Fat Cats. In that way this money doesn’t reach the Afghanistan, nor the Army in States; it only runs from peoples’ pockets, through some fat fingers, to some Virgin Islands. This money could even come back and support the American infrastructure, but it doesn’t, as it is not profitable enough.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jacques sheete
    Thanks, 2DsP!

    ...she’s taking facts and using them to lead a reader to a conclusion that favors her political agenda.
     
    Probably so, but she still sounds naive; her attempt at propaganda is way too transparent.

    Everything, including news, propaganda, and even boolsheete these days is degraded. It's so bad that I'm starting to enjoy the madness!

    I know what you mean. I even fear that I might become a connoisseur of the most ridiculous.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Great, great posts from everyone, especially Erebus’ exposure of the perpetual war planners in the Pentagon.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jacques sheete
    Great comment. Bless you for bringing forward a slice of the truth.

    Others with military experience loathe the bureaucrats with guns as well.

    As soon as the government has the money and the soldiers, instead of fulfilling their promises to defend their subjects from foreign enemies, and to arrange things for their benefit, they do all they can to provoke the neighbouring nations and to produce war; and they not only do not promote the internal well-being of their people, but they ruin and corrupt them.

    A few typos, but otherwise a fine summary: Tolstoy, Slavery of Our Times, Chap 8, 11 July, 1900

    http://ebooks.gutenberg.us/WorldeBookLibrary.com/slaverytol.htm#1_0_7

     
    I wonder what he knew about what happened to the people during Shay's rebellion. I bet he knew about Sherman's scorched earth policy too.

    People often ask if the military would fire on US citizens...

    Learning about the Whiskey rebellion and the reason for the whiskey tax imposed on the frontiers people turned me against the founders forever.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Learning about the Whiskey rebellion and the reason for the whiskey tax imposed on the frontiers people turned me against the founders forever.
     
    That, and the fact that a lot of the people who actually fought the war went into debt to do that and ended up losing everything because of it.

    Screwed from the get-go, and still taking a screwing for another 200+ years, yet most think they live in a democracy and enjoy "freedom." Indebted to the gills in the interest of the rich, communistic-fascist ruling classes as well, yet "all is good."

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Erebus


    I did notice that there are quite a numbers of philosophers here who could contribute to put the country on the right path.
     
    No such thing will ever happen.
     
    Well Jacques, it depends on one's definition of "philosophy". It was "Philosophers", under the rubric of "Grand Strategists", that got us into this mess, and a couple have popped up that may just get us at least part of the way out. Inertia being what it is, the latter have an uphill battle, but if one takes a broad view it looks like we may actually be past the tipping point.

    Anyhow, here's a thumbnail sketch of how/why I think we got here and who led us. Dick Cheney may have branded the "War on Terror (that) wouldn't end in our lifetime", but however happily he and they profited from it, neither he nor his friends in the MIC or Congress invented it. It takes deep-thinkers to formulate coherent ideological underpinnings for a war against no definable threat, no identified enemy, on no identifiable battlefield, or even identifiable theatre. Open-ended war anywhere, nowhere, everywhere, against everyone and no-one, is not easy to justify.

    The War on Terror is the product of a group of intellectual heavy-lifters in the bowels of the Pentagon, working on "emerging threats" and "force restructuring" under Adm. Art Cebrowski in the '90s. While it has a tangential connection to "counter-terrorism", this new type of war has everything to do with "prevent(ing) the re-emergence of a new rival", the No.1 objective of American foreign policy since Wolfowitz, and a then emerging philosophy of war best stated by one of its most vocal proponents. To whit, the War on Terror that began in Afghanistan in Oct, 2001 and would soon move to Iraq marked the "... historical tipping point--the moment when Washington [took] real ownership of strategic security in the age of globalization".

    At bottom, Globalization with American Characteristics (GAC) is the Great Project, the over-arching paradigm within which all the developed world's think-tankers and policy wonks live and work, and in which their counterparts in the developing world work to join. In the mid '90s, the recognition that American power could not itself force GAC on the entire world forced some introspection. Initially formulated under the mentorship of Cebrowski, T. P. M. Barnett went on to create his "Core-Gap" theory of how GAC could continue to develop and what use of military force would best contribute to that development.

    In a nutshell, the theory's basic tenet is that the long developing Globalization was geo-political-economic reality, an inexorable world-historical process that was born centuries ago, and America's recent ownership of that process (creating GAC) was its greatest civilizational achievement. Barnett calls it "... greatest foreign policy achievement in history – namely, the rapid and planet-wide spread of our economic source-code (aka, globalization)". The failure of so grand a vision, the vision that created and/or tuned all of the world's significant institutions, would literally mean TEOTWAWKI.

    The types of military force configurations, strategies and tactics that would best underpin and expand the spread of GAC, and ensure that it retained both its American characteristics and control came to be sold to the public under the meme “War on Terror”. 9/11 was its kick-off party.

    Alas, GAC was not quite "planet-wide" yet, and much of the world has yet to see, much less enjoy the benefits of this wonderful trend. The "Core", basically the OECD countries, are thoroughly embedded in the GAC process, but there are lots of laggards, and some may never get there. The pre-eminent function of the USM is to see to it that these laggards and outsiders, the “Gap" countries, are prevented from disrupting the process, and where possible to be brought into it. If their socio-political conditions make that difficult/impossible, they are to be broken so they can't disrupt the great world-historical trend. Whatever their status, if they have anything valuable - minerals, energy, water - these must be made available to the Core and near-Core, even if they have to be maintained in a socio-politically chaotic state while their resources are being "liberated". That is why the USM abandoned large formations and moved towards much greater use of small SF formations, drones, proxies, and why they're active in ~100 countries.

    Barnett's thinking held great sway in Washington's brain-trusts before, and in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, and continues to drive much of what we see happening. The jaw-dropping Ameri-centrism of this heady program explains the hubris, the strategic and analytic myopia, the disastrous procurement blunders, and explains completely the so-called "failures" in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and soon in a country near you.

    It also explains the security and military doctrinal documents that were recently released making explicit America's rivalry with China & Russia. Though these countries are fully embedded in Globalization per se, they wish to re-define it, replacing the Ameri-centric component with a multipolar structure that's tolerant of nations not much impressed with American "culture", however much they like the “economic source-code”. They want the baby, not the bath water, and they've developed the economic and military heft to present a serious challenge. More dangerously, they've formulated coherent visions and are executing the supporting policies that many countries previously enamoured with America's exceptionalism find attractive.

    That, of course, is anathema to the formulators and guiders of American military and geo-political doctrines. Fundamentally, these documents recognize that the East-West spread of Globalization is all but complete, but is spinning out of American control and is now at risk of being partitioned into those old spheres of influence that will again come to define the limits of American influence. They want it back, but the authors are behind the curve. Already, the East-West thrust has largely been abandoned but for some rear-guard chest beating in E. Europe, ME and the E&SCSs.

    In its place, a new North-South axis has opened in the form of migration. The Core's deep-thinkers, having recognized Russian & Chinese pre-eminence on the East-West axis, have shifted their gaze due south. A new twist in the game is afoot.

    Barnett's Core-Gap theory early in the 21st century can be read here:
    http://thomaspmbarnett.squarespace.com/globlogization/2010/8/17/blast-from-my-past-the-pentagons-new-map-2003.html#ixzz57HDXs7lh

    Barnett's more recent thinking, with thoughts on why the US won't be building any walls soon, can be read here.
    http://thomaspmbarnett.squarespace.com/globlogization/2016/2/18/americas-post-oil-grand-strategy.html#ixzz57HbsBKqW

    A very good post.

    Not quite sure I agree with the text below

    They want it back, but the authors are behind the curve.

    but, the above is well worth re-reading.

    This caught my eye:

    Though these countries are fully embedded in Globalization per se, they wish to re-define it, replacing the Ameri-centric component with a multipolar structure that’s tolerant of nations not much impressed with American “culture”, however much they like the “economic source-code”.

    It appears that our….commoners…only choice is between being owned by US, Russian and Chinese “1 percenter” in that “multipolar world”.
    Great.

    In my case, most likely, should it happen, on top of the shit I’ve been eating so far I’ll need to learn Chinese.
    Can’t wait.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The upper middle class — the top 20% who make all the decisions — have become fantastically wealthy since 9/11, mostly thanks to stock market gains. This class, who do not send their sons to fight and quite often don’t even know anyone in the military, is nonetheless probably vaguely aware that their wealth is somehow tied to the endless wars, and thus the blank stares the author receives at parties.

    Then there is that other class who willingly enlist in the military. They do support the wars, or at least on the level of insisting we “support the troops.”

    There is no end to this until something gives. That would mean either national bankruptcy, or we run out of working class white boys to do the fighting.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    I don't write this with any certain knowledge but your "run out of working class white boys to do the fighting" makes me wonder about your familiarity with today's US armed forces. True, finding a fully proportionate contingent of blacks with sufficient measured cognitive ability may be difficult but my impression is that the US forces are full of people with Hispanic names, and not many of them pure descendants of blonde Visigoths.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • well young lady we just don’t live in that world. The world where no one wants to force another is a very reasoned and delightful thought. On occasion, one is forced into a fight. I thought Iraq and Afghanistan were mistakes from the get go. But then my response to 9/11 was just not that of the country’s. That’s the real world, you are chugging along minding your beezwax as most citizens were (completely unaware of our rendition, and assorted other foreign policy activities . . .) and whack, before you know it, your trying to figure out how you turned out to be the bad guy. And the leadership says your not the bad guy those guys are you are off to the races.

    The Vietnam protesters are demanding we go to war against a nebulous shifting morphing, shape-shifting immortal beast called “terrorism” and we set loose the hounds of war. The Vietnam protesters who actually sided with the communists aggressive S. Vietnam are now demanding wars to spread democracy. The “give peace a change” generation has proceeded to make war in: Iraq, Libya, Syria, the Ukraine, Afghanistan to advance more free love and peace in the name of killing children in the womb, same sex marriage, and capitalism. Only to be told that they can’t use coal, or smelt iron as we have, because we are melting the planet. And should they use such practices in development, we will make war on their new liberation.

    I think solving cancer is a much easier task. And while the current executive mat now be jumping on that bandwagon, it would do well to remember that wagon was built, painted and rolling downhill before he was elected.

    All one can do now is to remind him he was elected to stop the wagon or at least make a sincere effort to slow it down.

    Still we need a military because one never knows when your harbor might get attacked or one of forts might come under assault as happened to Pearl harbor and Fort Sumter — in such cases one has to respond. Unfortunately, with respect to our response — wrong country and the other poor choice of response.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wayne
    Totally agree. I too are from the Vietnam era. I was attending college from 1970-4. As my father and grandfather served in WWII, I felt guilty for getting an education instead of enlisting. I now thank God I didn't.
    Having retired a couple of years ago I now substitute teach a few days a week. Thursday I was in a high school English class where the teacher had a bulletin board where students could place their names under different columns based on their post high school plans. There were quite a few names under "Entering the military." I didn't know whether weep or shout out "fools!"

    excuse this post Absolutely misplaced –

    It was not meant for you — at all — good greif. But for the author. issues excuse me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ChuckOrloski
    Hi Jacques Sheete,

    As you are most likely not at a Happy Hour party, please look at the words (below) of Counterpunch, J. St. Clair, which convey Hamid Karzai's good point about the United States not being in Afghanistan for a "party."

    + This just in from Hamid Karzai on why the US continues to occupy and bomb Afghanistan: “The United States is not here to go to a party. There is no need for them to build so many bases just to defeat a few Taliban. They are here because all the great American rivals are in the neighborhood, and we happen to be here, too. They are welcome to stay but not to deceive us…Too many Afghans are dying for an uncertain future,. We are too small and poor to ask the U.S. to stop, but we are a country, and our interests must be respected.” Of course, Karzai’s precise understanding of the metrics of US foreign policy is derided in the western press as a “dark theory.”

    Too bad Mssrs. Karzai and St. Clair forgot to convey "precise (metrics) understanding" about the dark 9/11 deception which compelled the W. Bush Neocons to invade & occupy Afghanistan, Autumn, 2001.

    (Zigh) How can I expect more "beef" from Brown's Stephanie Savell?

    Uh..., bottoms up, Jacques?

    (Zigh) How can I expect more “beef” from Brown’s Stephanie Savell?

    Indeed, Chuck!

    Keep ‘em coming!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Erebus


    I did notice that there are quite a numbers of philosophers here who could contribute to put the country on the right path.
     
    No such thing will ever happen.
     
    Well Jacques, it depends on one's definition of "philosophy". It was "Philosophers", under the rubric of "Grand Strategists", that got us into this mess, and a couple have popped up that may just get us at least part of the way out. Inertia being what it is, the latter have an uphill battle, but if one takes a broad view it looks like we may actually be past the tipping point.

    Anyhow, here's a thumbnail sketch of how/why I think we got here and who led us. Dick Cheney may have branded the "War on Terror (that) wouldn't end in our lifetime", but however happily he and they profited from it, neither he nor his friends in the MIC or Congress invented it. It takes deep-thinkers to formulate coherent ideological underpinnings for a war against no definable threat, no identified enemy, on no identifiable battlefield, or even identifiable theatre. Open-ended war anywhere, nowhere, everywhere, against everyone and no-one, is not easy to justify.

    The War on Terror is the product of a group of intellectual heavy-lifters in the bowels of the Pentagon, working on "emerging threats" and "force restructuring" under Adm. Art Cebrowski in the '90s. While it has a tangential connection to "counter-terrorism", this new type of war has everything to do with "prevent(ing) the re-emergence of a new rival", the No.1 objective of American foreign policy since Wolfowitz, and a then emerging philosophy of war best stated by one of its most vocal proponents. To whit, the War on Terror that began in Afghanistan in Oct, 2001 and would soon move to Iraq marked the "... historical tipping point--the moment when Washington [took] real ownership of strategic security in the age of globalization".

    At bottom, Globalization with American Characteristics (GAC) is the Great Project, the over-arching paradigm within which all the developed world's think-tankers and policy wonks live and work, and in which their counterparts in the developing world work to join. In the mid '90s, the recognition that American power could not itself force GAC on the entire world forced some introspection. Initially formulated under the mentorship of Cebrowski, T. P. M. Barnett went on to create his "Core-Gap" theory of how GAC could continue to develop and what use of military force would best contribute to that development.

    In a nutshell, the theory's basic tenet is that the long developing Globalization was geo-political-economic reality, an inexorable world-historical process that was born centuries ago, and America's recent ownership of that process (creating GAC) was its greatest civilizational achievement. Barnett calls it "... greatest foreign policy achievement in history – namely, the rapid and planet-wide spread of our economic source-code (aka, globalization)". The failure of so grand a vision, the vision that created and/or tuned all of the world's significant institutions, would literally mean TEOTWAWKI.

    The types of military force configurations, strategies and tactics that would best underpin and expand the spread of GAC, and ensure that it retained both its American characteristics and control came to be sold to the public under the meme “War on Terror”. 9/11 was its kick-off party.

    Alas, GAC was not quite "planet-wide" yet, and much of the world has yet to see, much less enjoy the benefits of this wonderful trend. The "Core", basically the OECD countries, are thoroughly embedded in the GAC process, but there are lots of laggards, and some may never get there. The pre-eminent function of the USM is to see to it that these laggards and outsiders, the “Gap" countries, are prevented from disrupting the process, and where possible to be brought into it. If their socio-political conditions make that difficult/impossible, they are to be broken so they can't disrupt the great world-historical trend. Whatever their status, if they have anything valuable - minerals, energy, water - these must be made available to the Core and near-Core, even if they have to be maintained in a socio-politically chaotic state while their resources are being "liberated". That is why the USM abandoned large formations and moved towards much greater use of small SF formations, drones, proxies, and why they're active in ~100 countries.

    Barnett's thinking held great sway in Washington's brain-trusts before, and in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, and continues to drive much of what we see happening. The jaw-dropping Ameri-centrism of this heady program explains the hubris, the strategic and analytic myopia, the disastrous procurement blunders, and explains completely the so-called "failures" in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and soon in a country near you.

    It also explains the security and military doctrinal documents that were recently released making explicit America's rivalry with China & Russia. Though these countries are fully embedded in Globalization per se, they wish to re-define it, replacing the Ameri-centric component with a multipolar structure that's tolerant of nations not much impressed with American "culture", however much they like the “economic source-code”. They want the baby, not the bath water, and they've developed the economic and military heft to present a serious challenge. More dangerously, they've formulated coherent visions and are executing the supporting policies that many countries previously enamoured with America's exceptionalism find attractive.

    That, of course, is anathema to the formulators and guiders of American military and geo-political doctrines. Fundamentally, these documents recognize that the East-West spread of Globalization is all but complete, but is spinning out of American control and is now at risk of being partitioned into those old spheres of influence that will again come to define the limits of American influence. They want it back, but the authors are behind the curve. Already, the East-West thrust has largely been abandoned but for some rear-guard chest beating in E. Europe, ME and the E&SCSs.

    In its place, a new North-South axis has opened in the form of migration. The Core's deep-thinkers, having recognized Russian & Chinese pre-eminence on the East-West axis, have shifted their gaze due south. A new twist in the game is afoot.

    Barnett's Core-Gap theory early in the 21st century can be read here:
    http://thomaspmbarnett.squarespace.com/globlogization/2010/8/17/blast-from-my-past-the-pentagons-new-map-2003.html#ixzz57HDXs7lh

    Barnett's more recent thinking, with thoughts on why the US won't be building any walls soon, can be read here.
    http://thomaspmbarnett.squarespace.com/globlogization/2016/2/18/americas-post-oil-grand-strategy.html#ixzz57HbsBKqW

    Good gawd, man!

    I did not read your post. If you want to air your ideas, state ‘em briefly.

    I didn’t get past, “Well Jacques, it depends on one’s definition of “philosophy”. It was “Philosophers”, under the rubric of “Grand Strategists”, that got us into this mess…”

    First off, I already know all that, and secondly, the comment about “philosophers” originated with IR and I think I detected a bit of sarcasm there.

    Anyway, your point(s) were? I’ll “give” you 100 words to make your case.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @redmudhooch
    No one deserves to have to live in misery, so some can live high on the hog.
    I never would have said this a couple of years ago, but seeing what our "government" here in America is capable of, how they have been treating us over the past decade, the police state, the neverending expansion of surveillance on their own citizens, militarizing the police in rural towns, one starts to think, "what the hell are they so paranoid of?" Why do they need to do all of this if they're only doing good things? People doing good deeds don't do insane stuff like we've been witnessing....
    Realizing how they are controlled by the Israeli lobbies, AIPAC, Wall St., MIC, the Banksters, I start to understand why those Middle Easterners are so fed up and angry. If they're doing all of this to us, their fellow Americans, I can't imagine what they're doing to those poor folks over there, out of sight.
    I think all Americans are starting to see that our government are the bad guys, the terrorists, the axis of evil, the evil empire. Then you learn they have a history of doing this, USS Liberty attack in 67. Then you learn the kind of things JFK was pushing for before he was killed, ending the Fed, FARA on the Israeli Lobby, inspecting the Dimona nuclear site in Israel, it all starts to make sense. It becomes more obvious everyday.
    Then you start looking into the holocaust story and how much stuff just doesn't add up. Again, everything start lining up and making more sense.
    I knew from the moment 9/11 happened something wasn't right. Then when you start researching it, find out all the things that had to happen to even make it possible, no way some guys hiding out in caves could have pulled it off, its obvious some kind of explosives were professionally rigged into those building to vaporize them like that. Building 7 wasn't even hit by a plane. Then you find out Building 7 was home to the CIA, FBI, all kinds of govt. agencies. WTF????
    Then for the same lies to just keep getting repeated in the MSM, you know they're in on it too, the same people that did 9/11 are controlling the media to keep the narrative going for so long.
    Everyone knows, but they keep up the charades, every year, 16 years, different presidents, no change, its the most insane thing I've ever witnessed. They're all completely delusional.
    It has to be the work of the devil himself.

    Youtube videos I've watched lately that woke me up:
    Incontrovertible - New 9/11 Documentary by Tony Rooke
    9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money
    The Chemistry of Auschwitz
    Holocaust History - Dr. Frederick Toben (2003)
    Benjamin H. Freedman speech 1961
    Dean Irebodd - Buchenwald: A Portrayal of Evil (2008)

    Then you find out Building 7 was home to the CIA, FBI, all kinds of govt. agencies. WTF????

    You may already know about this, too.

    The Pentagon was hit apparently in the offices where audits of military spending are supposedly done (yeah, I know, the government auditing itself has to be a sick joke) and this occurred the day after Scumsfeld announced that the Pentagon was unable to count for TRIllions of dollars of spending.

    Rumsfeld says $2.3 TRILLION Missing from Pentagon
    “The adversary is closer to home; it’s the Pentagon bureaucracy…”

    - Donald Rumsfeld on Sept. 10, 2001

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU4GdHLUHwU

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?165947-1/defense-business-practices

    Gee, what a coincidence, eh? And they claim that “camel jockeys” ain’t too bright…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wayne
    Totally agree. I too are from the Vietnam era. I was attending college from 1970-4. As my father and grandfather served in WWII, I felt guilty for getting an education instead of enlisting. I now thank God I didn't.
    Having retired a couple of years ago I now substitute teach a few days a week. Thursday I was in a high school English class where the teacher had a bulletin board where students could place their names under different columns based on their post high school plans. There were quite a few names under "Entering the military." I didn't know whether weep or shout out "fools!"

    There were quite a few names under “Entering the military.” I didn’t know whether weep or shout out “fools!”

    On the one hand, one could do both.

    On the other hand, we can blame the media; they glorify the “heroism” of it all. The filthy ba$tard$!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wayne
    Totally agree. I too are from the Vietnam era. I was attending college from 1970-4. As my father and grandfather served in WWII, I felt guilty for getting an education instead of enlisting. I now thank God I didn't.
    Having retired a couple of years ago I now substitute teach a few days a week. Thursday I was in a high school English class where the teacher had a bulletin board where students could place their names under different columns based on their post high school plans. There were quite a few names under "Entering the military." I didn't know whether weep or shout out "fools!"

    well young lady we just don’t live in that world. The world where no one wants to force another is a very reasoned and delightful thought. On occasion, one is forced into a fight. I thought Iraq and Afghanistan were mistakes from the get go. But then my response to 9/11 was just not that of the country’s. That’s the real world, you are chugging along minding your beezwax as most citizens were (completely unaware of our rendition, and assorted other foreign policy activities . . .) and whack, before you know it, your trying to figure out how you turned out to be the bad guy. And the leadership says your not the bad guy those guys are you are off to the races.

    The Vietnam protesters are demanding we go to war against a nebulous shifting morphing, shape-shifting immortal beast called “terrorism” and we set loose the hounds of war. The Vietnam protesters who actually sided with the communists aggressive S. Vietnam are now demanding wars to spread democracy. The “give peace a change” generation has proceeded to make war in: Iraq, Libya, Syria, the Ukraine, Afghanistan to advance more free love and peace in the name of killing children in the womb, same sex marriage, and capitalism. Only to be told that they can’t use coal, or smelt iron as we have, because we are melting the planet. And should they use such practices in development, we will make war on their new liberation.

    I think solving cancer is a much easier task. And while the current executive mat now be jumping on that bandwagon, it would do well to remember that wagon was built, painted and rolling downhill before he was elected.

    All one can do now is to remind him he was elected to stop the wagon or at least make a sincere effort to slow it down.

    Still we need a military because one never knows when your harbor might get attacked or one of forts might come under assault as happened to Pearl harbor and Fort Sumter — in such cases one has to respond. Unfortunately, with respect to our response — wrong country and the other poor choice of response.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @DanFromCt
    I’m a combat vet from the Vietnam era and find it ominous when I use my VA card for a store discount and get thanked “for my service” by well-meaning people who have no inkling of how deeply their very thoughts are scripted by the media and Hollywood, who just yesterday were calling anyone in uniform a “baby killer.”

    Anyone in military uniform today, however, is called a “hero” on TV. Such nonsense is part of the grinning mockery of our military and most definitely not any sort of praise, making fools out of the cretins who’d risk their lives or put up with military life to serve the neocon’s mass-murdering agenda.

    I appreciate your service. I appreciate the service you provided in Vietnam.

    I think you are mistaking a nod to your sacrifice as a member of service for support of the political agendas a service member is asked to serve in. The current use of the term also acknowledges that te Vietnam war era nonsense is over. Attacks on service members were largely unwarranted, not to mention attacking the US support for S. Vietnam.

    I would encourage you to embrace their thanks as an attempt assuage that for which there is no just repayment.

    Read More
    • LOL: jacques sheete
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jacques sheete

    I did notice that there are quite a numbers of philosophers here who could contribute to put the country on the right path.
     
    No such thing will ever happen.

    There are reasons why Socrates and Plato (to name just two) refused to get involved with politics, and it wasn't fear but futility that kept 'em out. Even then, we all know what happened to Socrates. JC too.

    I suspect we're all better of waiting for the Second Coming as long as we don't plan on holding our collective breath or expect too much!

    PS:


    There is a blame of the Military that I am not willing to endorse.
     
    That's why nothing will ever change. Now, go and repent. And wait.

    I did notice that there are quite a numbers of philosophers here who could contribute to put the country on the right path.

    No such thing will ever happen.

    Well Jacques, it depends on one’s definition of “philosophy”. It was “Philosophers”, under the rubric of “Grand Strategists”, that got us into this mess, and a couple have popped up that may just get us at least part of the way out. Inertia being what it is, the latter have an uphill battle, but if one takes a broad view it looks like we may actually be past the tipping point.

    Anyhow, here’s a thumbnail sketch of how/why I think we got here and who led us. Dick Cheney may have branded the “War on Terror (that) wouldn’t end in our lifetime”, but however happily he and they profited from it, neither he nor his friends in the MIC or Congress invented it. It takes deep-thinkers to formulate coherent ideological underpinnings for a war against no definable threat, no identified enemy, on no identifiable battlefield, or even identifiable theatre. Open-ended war anywhere, nowhere, everywhere, against everyone and no-one, is not easy to justify.

    The War on Terror is the product of a group of intellectual heavy-lifters in the bowels of the Pentagon, working on “emerging threats” and “force restructuring” under Adm. Art Cebrowski in the ’90s. While it has a tangential connection to “counter-terrorism”, this new type of war has everything to do with “prevent(ing) the re-emergence of a new rival”, the No.1 objective of American foreign policy since Wolfowitz, and a then emerging philosophy of war best stated by one of its most vocal proponents. To whit, the War on Terror that began in Afghanistan in Oct, 2001 and would soon move to Iraq marked the “… historical tipping point–the moment when Washington [took] real ownership of strategic security in the age of globalization”.

    At bottom, Globalization with American Characteristics (GAC) is the Great Project, the over-arching paradigm within which all the developed world’s think-tankers and policy wonks live and work, and in which their counterparts in the developing world work to join. In the mid ’90s, the recognition that American power could not itself force GAC on the entire world forced some introspection. Initially formulated under the mentorship of Cebrowski, T. P. M. Barnett went on to create his “Core-Gap” theory of how GAC could continue to develop and what use of military force would best contribute to that development.

    In a nutshell, the theory’s basic tenet is that the long developing Globalization was geo-political-economic reality, an inexorable world-historical process that was born centuries ago, and America’s recent ownership of that process (creating GAC) was its greatest civilizational achievement. Barnett calls it “… greatest foreign policy achievement in history – namely, the rapid and planet-wide spread of our economic source-code (aka, globalization)”. The failure of so grand a vision, the vision that created and/or tuned all of the world’s significant institutions, would literally mean TEOTWAWKI.

    The types of military force configurations, strategies and tactics that would best underpin and expand the spread of GAC, and ensure that it retained both its American characteristics and control came to be sold to the public under the meme “War on Terror”. 9/11 was its kick-off party.

    Alas, GAC was not quite “planet-wide” yet, and much of the world has yet to see, much less enjoy the benefits of this wonderful trend. The “Core”, basically the OECD countries, are thoroughly embedded in the GAC process, but there are lots of laggards, and some may never get there. The pre-eminent function of the USM is to see to it that these laggards and outsiders, the “Gap” countries, are prevented from disrupting the process, and where possible to be brought into it. If their socio-political conditions make that difficult/impossible, they are to be broken so they can’t disrupt the great world-historical trend. Whatever their status, if they have anything valuable – minerals, energy, water – these must be made available to the Core and near-Core, even if they have to be maintained in a socio-politically chaotic state while their resources are being “liberated”. That is why the USM abandoned large formations and moved towards much greater use of small SF formations, drones, proxies, and why they’re active in ~100 countries.

    Barnett’s thinking held great sway in Washington’s brain-trusts before, and in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, and continues to drive much of what we see happening. The jaw-dropping Ameri-centrism of this heady program explains the hubris, the strategic and analytic myopia, the disastrous procurement blunders, and explains completely the so-called “failures” in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and soon in a country near you.

    It also explains the security and military doctrinal documents that were recently released making explicit America’s rivalry with China & Russia. Though these countries are fully embedded in Globalization per se, they wish to re-define it, replacing the Ameri-centric component with a multipolar structure that’s tolerant of nations not much impressed with American “culture”, however much they like the “economic source-code”. They want the baby, not the bath water, and they’ve developed the economic and military heft to present a serious challenge. More dangerously, they’ve formulated coherent visions and are executing the supporting policies that many countries previously enamoured with America’s exceptionalism find attractive.

    That, of course, is anathema to the formulators and guiders of American military and geo-political doctrines. Fundamentally, these documents recognize that the East-West spread of Globalization is all but complete, but is spinning out of American control and is now at risk of being partitioned into those old spheres of influence that will again come to define the limits of American influence. They want it back, but the authors are behind the curve. Already, the East-West thrust has largely been abandoned but for some rear-guard chest beating in E. Europe, ME and the E&SCSs.

    In its place, a new North-South axis has opened in the form of migration. The Core’s deep-thinkers, having recognized Russian & Chinese pre-eminence on the East-West axis, have shifted their gaze due south. A new twist in the game is afoot.

    Barnett’s Core-Gap theory early in the 21st century can be read here:

    http://thomaspmbarnett.squarespace.com/globlogization/2010/8/17/blast-from-my-past-the-pentagons-new-map-2003.html#ixzz57HDXs7lh

    Barnett’s more recent thinking, with thoughts on why the US won’t be building any walls soon, can be read here.

    http://thomaspmbarnett.squarespace.com/globlogization/2016/2/18/americas-post-oil-grand-strategy.html#ixzz57HbsBKqW

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    Good gawd, man!

    I did not read your post. If you want to air your ideas, state 'em briefly.

    I didn't get past, "Well Jacques, it depends on one’s definition of “philosophy”. It was “Philosophers”, under the rubric of “Grand Strategists”, that got us into this mess..."

    First off, I already know all that, and secondly, the comment about "philosophers" originated with IR and I think I detected a bit of sarcasm there.

    Anyway, your point(s) were? I'll "give" you 100 words to make your case.
    , @peterAUS
    A very good post.

    Not quite sure I agree with the text below

    They want it back, but the authors are behind the curve.
     
    but, the above is well worth re-reading.

    This caught my eye:

    Though these countries are fully embedded in Globalization per se, they wish to re-define it, replacing the Ameri-centric component with a multipolar structure that’s tolerant of nations not much impressed with American “culture”, however much they like the “economic source-code”.
     
    It appears that our....commoners...only choice is between being owned by US, Russian and Chinese "1 percenter" in that "multipolar world".
    Great.

    In my case, most likely, should it happen, on top of the shit I've been eating so far I'll need to learn Chinese.
    Can't wait.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    Thank you for the introduction to that essentially very decent American Thomas Barnett. Are you saying that he was inflential somewhere where it mattered (a) before the 2003 invasion of Iraq
    (b) before 9/11?. He got right, or potentially anyway, America's need to have involved China (and I would add India and Russia) in sorting out the ME even before the fracking revolution made it a no brainer but he missed what I got quite explicitly right in 2003, viz. that a good outcome in Iraq (without getting out of Afghanistan) depended on America having suficient military and economic strength - which I strongly doubted - and the political stamina which I doubted even more.

    BTW because I have your attention on one of the serious issues of the last 20 years allow me to draw your attention to a National Geographic doco on another one, namely on China wherein I got an explanation for the Chinese leaders' continuong, even increadsing, clamp down on what we would regard as harmless dissent and campaigning for more democracy. It is their fear, often as members of victim families, of what was unleashed by Mao's Cultural Revolution which, it should be recalled, upended the Communist Party itself. To say the least Chinese history has not shown the Chinese to be less given to violence and warfare than other peoples despite a period when softheaded Westerners would think of China as just peacefully minding its own business (remember the influence of Edgar Snow anf Felix Greene?). With one reservation I buy the argument that it was the experience of the Cultural Revolution which makes the present Communist leadership unwilling to take the slightest risk of the unruly ignorant demos taking off. (An exolanation with a built in hope for change, is it not?) My reservation is based on the thought that, especially with an ageing population and so many people becoming well off, a structured democracy could be devised which might require age qualifications, inter alia, and avoid many other of the pretences about human equality that the declining West indulges. But I say that without knowing how the gestures to local self-government one used to hear about are going now, or whether the frequent protests about corruption and local party thuggery are now being listened to or stamped on.

    Australia is a country which has been able to afford a lot of democracy by good luck as well as reasonaby good management. I'm afraid it is about to prove the CCP''s fears of the masses and populism right. Despite his poor ratings agsinst the current PM, Bill Shorten, the leader of the Labor Opposition is likely to lead his crew of union backed and financed oligarchs to victory next year by simply calculating how to buy the needed votes in the crudest possible way. After all the total sense of entitlements with a bit of dishonest kidding from politicians including Greens is about 200 er cent of what is, and you won't blame yourself for borrowing too much to buy a house in the big cities.

    Unfortunately Australia is likely to be able to finance a reduced productivity, higher tax bribe-the-voters existence for a long time so that Labor can keep on squeaking back into government. The new enterprising Chinese (especially) and Indian Australians may start by backing winners in the expected style but I would like to think they will set limits to their support of a party battening on to the lower socio-economic classes for support at the expense of business and high income earners. Hiding income and assets in Singapore and Hong Kong will still leave them a bit nervous about feral Greens forcing a leftward lurch on to Labor.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Do Americans really not care? That, at least, seems to have been the judgment of the many journalists who received our press release about the report.

    How many Americans even know we are still in Afghanistan or Iraq…the media wont tell them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Francis G.
    In "flyover" country, most of them have sons or brothers or cousins fighting over there, so plenty of Americans know. Although most of those "serving" claim they're doing it for patriotic reasons, they're mainly doing it for economic reasons.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @stephen kastl
    I appreciate what she and others are doing. Our military is out of control and committing war crimes daily based on a false premise. When I try to tell my own family, I get groans and eye rolling. Please keep trying to educate the masses even if they don’t want to hear it.

    Excellent work.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sarah Toga
    I had noticed in recent years the shift from the Vietnam era hostility against the military to the "thank you for your service" public manners ethic.
    I wondered how our masters in Hollywood and other cultural control towers had made that huge shift and made it stick.
    TPTB were formerly rabidly anti-military, i. e., W. Clinton loathed the military, etc. BHO was no hawk. Maybe DiFi got tons of military contract $$ for the complex in SoCal.
    I label them TPTB because the Clintons have ruled and continue to rule the Democratic Party and rule the Media, since 1992.
    The national GOP is effectively a fractured nebulous non-entity.
    "Dubya" is a fool.
    Democrat pols have made the decisions we have to live with. They had about 8 years majority, free rein from 2006 to 2014 to do anything they wanted.
    The net result is ton$ of $pending, 1,000's of White volunteer soldiers killed, maimed, PTSD'd.
    And we import more hostile foreigners (so-called immigration) than ever before. Then pay them to dawdle and scheme terror violence while on welfare. As the debt piles up.
    Stupid policies all around.
    Maybe Brown U could have a stupid policies studies center. But those academics and statists could never figure out they are the biggest problem.

    Articles like this from the vile and disgusting Yahoo?

    https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/russian-military-contractors-reportedly-tried-045652699.html

    The headline used the word whooped where is should have said murdered and it left out that the US has no business in Syria.

    I hate to say it but the American people will pay dearly for this at some point (many are already) and in a variety of ways.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Rand Paul (and his father Ron Paul) are on your side. Perhaps you are coming across too Brown-U/cult-anth leftist to gain the attention of the pro-peace libertarians? Peace activism needs to be a broad church.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The endless war is bad. But the hidden part is the endless war internal to our Western countries.

    The same warmonger bankers are the ones attacking family life and encouraging single motherdom which is so destructive of social capital.

    We must fight against foreign war and against the anti-family social engineering campaign at the same time.

    Only shills oppose one and are on the side of the other. Well paid shills.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • No one deserves to have to live in misery, so some can live high on the hog.
    I never would have said this a couple of years ago, but seeing what our “government” here in America is capable of, how they have been treating us over the past decade, the police state, the neverending expansion of surveillance on their own citizens, militarizing the police in rural towns, one starts to think, “what the hell are they so paranoid of?” Why do they need to do all of this if they’re only doing good things? People doing good deeds don’t do insane stuff like we’ve been witnessing….
    Realizing how they are controlled by the Israeli lobbies, AIPAC, Wall St., MIC, the Banksters, I start to understand why those Middle Easterners are so fed up and angry. If they’re doing all of this to us, their fellow Americans, I can’t imagine what they’re doing to those poor folks over there, out of sight.
    I think all Americans are starting to see that our government are the bad guys, the terrorists, the axis of evil, the evil empire. Then you learn they have a history of doing this, USS Liberty attack in 67. Then you learn the kind of things JFK was pushing for before he was killed, ending the Fed, FARA on the Israeli Lobby, inspecting the Dimona nuclear site in Israel, it all starts to make sense. It becomes more obvious everyday.
    Then you start looking into the holocaust story and how much stuff just doesn’t add up. Again, everything start lining up and making more sense.
    I knew from the moment 9/11 happened something wasn’t right. Then when you start researching it, find out all the things that had to happen to even make it possible, no way some guys hiding out in caves could have pulled it off, its obvious some kind of explosives were professionally rigged into those building to vaporize them like that. Building 7 wasn’t even hit by a plane. Then you find out Building 7 was home to the CIA, FBI, all kinds of govt. agencies. WTF????
    Then for the same lies to just keep getting repeated in the MSM, you know they’re in on it too, the same people that did 9/11 are controlling the media to keep the narrative going for so long.
    Everyone knows, but they keep up the charades, every year, 16 years, different presidents, no change, its the most insane thing I’ve ever witnessed. They’re all completely delusional.
    It has to be the work of the devil himself.

    Youtube videos I’ve watched lately that woke me up:
    Incontrovertible – New 9/11 Documentary by Tony Rooke
    9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money
    The Chemistry of Auschwitz
    Holocaust History – Dr. Frederick Toben (2003)
    Benjamin H. Freedman speech 1961
    Dean Irebodd – Buchenwald: A Portrayal of Evil (2008)

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Then you find out Building 7 was home to the CIA, FBI, all kinds of govt. agencies. WTF????
     
    You may already know about this, too.

    The Pentagon was hit apparently in the offices where audits of military spending are supposedly done (yeah, I know, the government auditing itself has to be a sick joke) and this occurred the day after Scumsfeld announced that the Pentagon was unable to count for TRIllions of dollars of spending.

    Rumsfeld says $2.3 TRILLION Missing from Pentagon
    “The adversary is closer to home; it’s the Pentagon bureaucracy…”

    - Donald Rumsfeld on Sept. 10, 2001
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU4GdHLUHwU
    https://www.c-span.org/video/?165947-1/defense-business-practices

     

    Gee, what a coincidence, eh? And they claim that "camel jockeys" ain't too bright...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @DanFromCt
    I’m a combat vet from the Vietnam era and find it ominous when I use my VA card for a store discount and get thanked “for my service” by well-meaning people who have no inkling of how deeply their very thoughts are scripted by the media and Hollywood, who just yesterday were calling anyone in uniform a “baby killer.”

    Anyone in military uniform today, however, is called a “hero” on TV. Such nonsense is part of the grinning mockery of our military and most definitely not any sort of praise, making fools out of the cretins who’d risk their lives or put up with military life to serve the neocon’s mass-murdering agenda.

    Totally agree. I too are from the Vietnam era. I was attending college from 1970-4. As my father and grandfather served in WWII, I felt guilty for getting an education instead of enlisting. I now thank God I didn’t.
    Having retired a couple of years ago I now substitute teach a few days a week. Thursday I was in a high school English class where the teacher had a bulletin board where students could place their names under different columns based on their post high school plans. There were quite a few names under “Entering the military.” I didn’t know whether weep or shout out “fools!”

    Read More
    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    well young lady we just don't live in that world. The world where no one wants to force another is a very reasoned and delightful thought. On occasion, one is forced into a fight. I thought Iraq and Afghanistan were mistakes from the get go. But then my response to 9/11 was just not that of the country's. That's the real world, you are chugging along minding your beezwax as most citizens were (completely unaware of our rendition, and assorted other foreign policy activities . . .) and whack, before you know it, your trying to figure out how you turned out to be the bad guy. And the leadership says your not the bad guy those guys are you are off to the races.


    The Vietnam protesters are demanding we go to war against a nebulous shifting morphing, shape-shifting immortal beast called "terrorism" and we set loose the hounds of war. The Vietnam protesters who actually sided with the communists aggressive S. Vietnam are now demanding wars to spread democracy. The "give peace a change" generation has proceeded to make war in: Iraq, Libya, Syria, the Ukraine, Afghanistan to advance more free love and peace in the name of killing children in the womb, same sex marriage, and capitalism. Only to be told that they can't use coal, or smelt iron as we have, because we are melting the planet. And should they use such practices in development, we will make war on their new liberation.


    I think solving cancer is a much easier task. And while the current executive mat now be jumping on that bandwagon, it would do well to remember that wagon was built, painted and rolling downhill before he was elected.

    All one can do now is to remind him he was elected to stop the wagon or at least make a sincere effort to slow it down.


    Still we need a military because one never knows when your harbor might get attacked or one of forts might come under assault as happened to Pearl harbor and Fort Sumter -- in such cases one has to respond. Unfortunately, with respect to our response -- wrong country and the other poor choice of response.

    , @jacques sheete

    There were quite a few names under “Entering the military.” I didn’t know whether weep or shout out “fools!”
     
    On the one hand, one could do both.

    On the other hand, we can blame the media; they glorify the "heroism" of it all. The filthy ba$tard$!
    , @EliteCommInc.
    excuse this post Absolutely misplaced --


    It was not meant for you -- at all -- good greif. But for the author. issues excuse me.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jacques sheete

    All the wars we are engaged in today are wars of the Jews, by the Jews, and for the Jews.
     
    It's becoming increasingly clear to me that, contrary to the usual mythology, certain Jews were the chief beneficiaries, (NOT victims) of the wars of a century ago as well. Yes, I mean the world wars of the last century.

    Hi Jacques Sheete,

    As you are most likely not at a Happy Hour party, please look at the words (below) of Counterpunch, J. St. Clair, which convey Hamid Karzai’s good point about the United States not being in Afghanistan for a “party.”

    + This just in from Hamid Karzai on why the US continues to occupy and bomb Afghanistan: “The United States is not here to go to a party. There is no need for them to build so many bases just to defeat a few Taliban. They are here because all the great American rivals are in the neighborhood, and we happen to be here, too. They are welcome to stay but not to deceive us…Too many Afghans are dying for an uncertain future,. We are too small and poor to ask the U.S. to stop, but we are a country, and our interests must be respected.” Of course, Karzai’s precise understanding of the metrics of US foreign policy is derided in the western press as a “dark theory.”

    Too bad Mssrs. Karzai and St. Clair forgot to convey “precise (metrics) understanding” about the dark 9/11 deception which compelled the W. Bush Neocons to invade & occupy Afghanistan, Autumn, 2001.

    (Zigh) How can I expect more “beef” from Brown’s Stephanie Savell?

    Uh…, bottoms up, Jacques?

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    (Zigh) How can I expect more “beef” from Brown’s Stephanie Savell?
     
    Indeed, Chuck!

    Keep 'em coming!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Realist 2018
    All the wars we are engaged in today are wars of the Jews, by the Jews, and for the Jews. That's why our Jew owned mainstream media is always keen on promoting the next war, it's their war, paid for by American taxpayers with American lives.

    All the wars we are engaged in today are wars of the Jews, by the Jews, and for the Jews.

    It’s becoming increasingly clear to me that, contrary to the usual mythology, certain Jews were the chief beneficiaries, (NOT victims) of the wars of a century ago as well. Yes, I mean the world wars of the last century.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
    Hi Jacques Sheete,

    As you are most likely not at a Happy Hour party, please look at the words (below) of Counterpunch, J. St. Clair, which convey Hamid Karzai's good point about the United States not being in Afghanistan for a "party."

    + This just in from Hamid Karzai on why the US continues to occupy and bomb Afghanistan: “The United States is not here to go to a party. There is no need for them to build so many bases just to defeat a few Taliban. They are here because all the great American rivals are in the neighborhood, and we happen to be here, too. They are welcome to stay but not to deceive us…Too many Afghans are dying for an uncertain future,. We are too small and poor to ask the U.S. to stop, but we are a country, and our interests must be respected.” Of course, Karzai’s precise understanding of the metrics of US foreign policy is derided in the western press as a “dark theory.”

    Too bad Mssrs. Karzai and St. Clair forgot to convey "precise (metrics) understanding" about the dark 9/11 deception which compelled the W. Bush Neocons to invade & occupy Afghanistan, Autumn, 2001.

    (Zigh) How can I expect more "beef" from Brown's Stephanie Savell?

    Uh..., bottoms up, Jacques?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • All the wars we are engaged in today are wars of the Jews, by the Jews, and for the Jews. That’s why our Jew owned mainstream media is always keen on promoting the next war, it’s their war, paid for by American taxpayers with American lives.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    All the wars we are engaged in today are wars of the Jews, by the Jews, and for the Jews.
     
    It's becoming increasingly clear to me that, contrary to the usual mythology, certain Jews were the chief beneficiaries, (NOT victims) of the wars of a century ago as well. Yes, I mean the world wars of the last century.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • P.S. Taken from academia lore, and to comply with Director Ilyana Rozumova’s expressed will, I bestow the following title upon my long comment: “Either publish how we want or perish.”

    Yeah, well, don’t forget that she also issued a “challenge” to the “philosophers” here. ;)

    Read More
    • Agree: ChuckOrloski
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Americans have an unusual problem: it is that they are unhinged from reality. This also explains their addiction to “virtual” reality.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jacques sheete

    I sense Ms. Savell shall be measurably taken aback by your focused take...
     
    It certainly would be interesting to know how she would react, but I suspect that she won't even see it, and if she does, she won't quite "get it" for a few more years.

    However, maybe it's a start.

    As for your video, thanks. I was wondering what happened to all the anti-Muslim hysteria lately.

    Boy, is that guy FoS! Everything he's saying about the other guys has been done by us for decades if not centuries. How can he say that stuff without throwing up? These cats are sick.Godddddammm adolescent rhetoric at best, too!

    With reason, Jacques Sheete says: “… but I suspect that she (Stephanie) won’t even see it, and if she does, she won’t quite “get it” for a few more years.”

    Hi Jacques,

    Regrettably, in order to protect her salary and reputation in Brown’s uptown academic community, a price is exacted upon Ms. Savell’s published actions.

    At this point in time, she does not want to model her life work on, let me say, that of “boots-on-the-ground,” peace activist / pursuant jailbird, Kathy Kelly.

    Maintenance of her respected image as a half-step “peace activist” prohibits Stephanie from “getting it” and freely communicating what is in-front of her nose.

    In compliance with the silent but pervasive Zio-censorship mandate, I assume the “Costs of War Project” Director can fire the PhD co-Director for “getting it” and unloading the chamber on what she really knows.

    Maybe she will avoid reading & responding to this lively U.R. comment thread, Jacques?
    Hm. Hard to predict but given ego damage done, I think she will.

    Were I 30-something & fashionably donning Dennis Rodman-style dinner party shoes, maybe I’d clam up & join “Happy Hour” proceedings.

    Doubtless, co-Director Savell is well briefed about risks and “costs” of her speaking from-the-hip?

    If not, she can immediately enter U.R. archives and learn how “The American Conservative” (T.A.C.) house pussies canned Philip Giraldi in response to his feral but truthful words.

    P.S. Taken from academia lore, and to comply with Director Ilyana Rozumova’s expressed will, I bestow the following title upon my long comment: “Either publish how we want or perish.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @DanFromCt
    I’m a combat vet from the Vietnam era and find it ominous when I use my VA card for a store discount and get thanked “for my service” by well-meaning people who have no inkling of how deeply their very thoughts are scripted by the media and Hollywood, who just yesterday were calling anyone in uniform a “baby killer.”

    Anyone in military uniform today, however, is called a “hero” on TV. Such nonsense is part of the grinning mockery of our military and most definitely not any sort of praise, making fools out of the cretins who’d risk their lives or put up with military life to serve the neocon’s mass-murdering agenda.

    ..and ‘jacques sheete’.
    My agree button doesn’t work!! I agree. (Grin)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Michael Kenny
    I have always suspected that the US war machine is self-financing and maybe even “profitable”. The cornerstone of US prosperity is Bretton Woods: the dollar as world reserve currency. That allows the US economy to continue to function even though hollowed out, financialized, and with a crippling burden of debt. That economic dominance requires global political dominance and power, as the saying goes, comes out of the barrel of a gun. Thus, the US not only needs to have the mightiest military machine on earth, it must prove its willingness to use it by actually waging war more or less permanently and, in particular, by beating off any challenge to its dominant position. Failure to do that renders the position of the dollar unsustainable, which would probably set off a Soviet-style implosion of the US economy and a 1929-style world economic crisis. Thus, cutting US military spending would not mean that the money now spent on it would be available for other purposes. That wealth just wouldn’t be there at all. The US is caught in a dilemma therefore. It cannot maintain the current levels of military spending but failing to maintain them will bring the whole house down!

    … the whole house down!

    It is certainly unavoidable now.
    The petro-yuan is coming, thus the fall of the petro-dollar, following the years the dominant position within the global economy has been so absurdly abused, is inevitable.

    The only way to stop it is with war. However, the only war that the empire can even come out as good as the other guys is in more or less mutual obliteration in nuclear war.

    One way or another, it does not look good for the empire, but most notably for the citizens of the empire.

    If it were mechanically possible, within the system, to change the direction/overthrow the tyranny of the financial elite/exceptional, perhaps it could be done with a mere ceremonial amount of destruction, but it does NOT look like that is possible.

    I noticed the wisdom of Donald Trump NOT talking about gun control in the wake of the (latest) Florida tragedy. It is wise because people know that they‘ll becoming for the guns. Because soon people will realize the utter contempt the people in office have for the citizens, and the entire corrupt system that puts them there and keeps them there. People know it, even if the intense propaganda still manages to keep it out of the waking consciousness of the majority; they still know!
    And they therefore know, even if only at a sub-conscious level, that they are going to needs their guns!

    The empire is in crisis and already in an unstoppable state of collapse, the only question is how much of everybody else will they take in their death-throws?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @prusmc
    The money could have been spent to find a cure for cancer. When did I first hear that: when I was in Jr High School, and a teacher was bitching that Presudent JFK promised to send a man to the moon before 1970. The educators were
    just beginning to dip into the federal aid to education honey pot and the wanted more. Then in 1968 a disgusting creature initials HHH raved about the social programs that could be established with the "peace dividend". The Armed Forces became a hollow institution in the 70s.
    Then the Congress approved increased and effective military expenditures in 1980. However, each defense dollar was matched by a dollar for domestic causes. The same pattern is found today. The large and truthfully wasteful military increases have an even more useless counterpart being squandered for all levels of government.
    Are we over- committeed to the unnecessary? Of course. Is there tremendous inefficiency and graft in defense? We only see the tip if the
    Iceberg. Common ground established. What does this "NPO and NGO from Browne University have to offer? Nothing except "feel good" snark. I wonder if anyone knows what is the so of its' funding is and how muchit spends each year?
    Personally, hard to commiserate with the "bad paper" people, since no one has has been forced to serve since 1973 We had a saying "you draw your pay and you take your chances".
    An alternative to all the wondeful things that could be done with existing and projected military budget expenditures( agree there is unimaginable waste) how about this: why not let the people keep the money they pay in taxes and spend it on what they want, rather than what this cultural anthropologist thinks is best for them ?

    …why not let the people keep the money they pay in taxes and spend it on what they want, rather than what this cultural anthropologist thinks is best for them ?

    I’ve been asking that for decades. The answer I’ve found is that the big business socialists, like the guys who supported FDR (while also funding Hitler and Stalin), aks the Red millionaires won’t have it that way.

    Ya wanna read about just one pig of the sort I’m alluding to? If so, I hope you have a strong stomach.

    This unctuous hagiography of Swope the General Electric money bag friend of FDR and supporter of the Nazis offers a few hints about the scum at the top. The “Swope Plan” was a fascistic-communistic proposal to concentrate wealth and power in the hands of a few at the top.

    https://www.immigrantentrepreneurship.org/entry.php?rec=61

    Here’s more.

    We must examine the roles of the Morgan and Chase Banks in World War II, specifically their collaboration with the Nazis in France while a major war was raging.

    In other words, the links between New York international bankers and major historical events, find a provable pattern of subsidy and political manipulation. Looking at the broad array of facts we find persistent recurrence of the same names: Owen Young, Gerard Swope, Hjalmar Schacht, Bernard Baruch, etc.; the same international banks: J.P. Morgan, Guaranty Trust, Chase Bank; and the same location in New York: usually 120 Broadway. This group of international bankers backed the Bolshevik Revolution and subsequently profited from the establishment of a Soviet Russia. This group backed Roosevelt and profited from New Deal socialism. This group also backed Hitler and certainly profited from the German armament in the 1930′s.

    http://nstarzone.com/HITLER.html

    Spartacus also has some worthwhile info on Swope, naturally hagiographic, but worth knowing. http://spartacus-educational.com/USAswope.htm

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sarah Toga
    Yep, when "Dubya" invaded Iraq with no plan whatsoever to impose order after destroying the place, I was flabbergasted. He actually thought Iraq would instantly become a functioning townhall-style democracy. What an idiot.
    Saddam Hussein and his sons Uday and Qusay were preferable to the aftermath of Dubya's stupidity. That shows the whole thing was unjustified, among other data points.
    Hah! I just realized Uday and Qusay Hussein were a better option than "Dubya"!
    John Kerry and Hillary Clinton were totally on board with that program, when it mattered prior to pulling the trigger.
    Then Hillary effectively ordered the murder of Khadafy (sp?) long after Khadafy had ceased to be an issue. Heck, he complied with our demands. Fat lot of good that did him.
    Donkey or Elephant, same bad results.

    Many of us had hopes The Donald could extract us from the endless war mess. At least he speaks out about the lives, limbs, blood and treasure wasted. At least he has not done a Syria invasion as the bloodthirsty neocons want. Maybe he can still do something decent about the mess. I wonder about the bombing-ISIS-campaign. Very difficult to find good information regarding our activities in all those war zones.

    Your historical T.R. quote from the 1922 source is most informative. A long term problem indeed.

    Your historical T.R. quote from the 1922 source is most informative.

    Thank you, I have several others.

    Here’s a couple more you may enjoy.

    Blind and deaf, yet she understood the scam. Note the dates.

    “Our democracy is but a name. We vote? What does that mean? It means that we choose between two bodies of real, though not avowed, autocrats. We choose between Tweedledum and Tweedledee.… “
    -Helen Keller,
    Letter published in the Manchester Advertiser (3 March 1911), quoted in A People’s History of the United States (1980) page 345.

    “Are not the dominant parties managed by the ruling classes, that is, the propertied classes, solely for the profit and privilege of the few?

    They use us millions to help them into power. They tell us like so many children that our safety lies in voting for them. They toss us crumbs of concession to make us believe that they are working in our interest. “

    -Helen Keller,OUT OF THE DARK, LETTER TO AN ENGLISH WOMAN- SUFFRAGIST* Copyright, 1907 http://archive.org/stream/outdarkessaysle01kellgoog/outdarkessaysle01kellgoog_djvu.txt

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @JustJeff
    Americans have a short historical memory. Anything that happened over ten years ago is ancient history. Everyone’s forgotten 9/11 and the Iraq war. If we were a less stupid country people might actually be angry that we’re now allies with al-Qaeda.

    If we were a less stupid country people might actually be angry that we’re now allies with al-Qaeda.

    If we were an even less stupid country people might actually be angry that we were once allies with Stalin and have been allies of the gangster state of Israel for decades and supporters of Zio-freaks since ~50 years before that.

    And if we were an even less stupid country people might actually be angry that we let Eastern European gangster “immigrants” and their progeny take over our banks, industry, schooling and government around a century ago.

    Appeasing those arse-wipes has earned us the contempt of nearly everyone, including wide awake ‘Merkins.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sarah Toga
    Speaking of taking over our schooling, let me recommend the book, "Credentialed to Destroy".
    And the blog, "Invisible Serf's Collar".
    Very sobering stuff. Almost too much to bear.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @orange dave
    Lost me when she used the word "felt" in the opener

    The money could have been spent to find a cure for cancer. When did I first hear that: when I was in Jr High School, and a teacher was bitching that Presudent JFK promised to send a man to the moon before 1970. The educators were
    just beginning to dip into the federal aid to education honey pot and the wanted more. Then in 1968 a disgusting creature initials HHH raved about the social programs that could be established with the “peace dividend”. The Armed Forces became a hollow institution in the 70s.
    Then the Congress approved increased and effective military expenditures in 1980. However, each defense dollar was matched by a dollar for domestic causes. The same pattern is found today. The large and truthfully wasteful military increases have an even more useless counterpart being squandered for all levels of government.
    Are we over- committeed to the unnecessary? Of course. Is there tremendous inefficiency and graft in defense? We only see the tip if the
    Iceberg. Common ground established. What does this “NPO and NGO from Browne University have to offer? Nothing except “feel good” snark. I wonder if anyone knows what is the so of its’ funding is and how muchit spends each year?
    Personally, hard to commiserate with the “bad paper” people, since no one has has been forced to serve since 1973 We had a saying “you draw your pay and you take your chances”.
    An alternative to all the wondeful things that could be done with existing and projected military budget expenditures( agree there is unimaginable waste) how about this: why not let the people keep the money they pay in taxes and spend it on what they want, rather than what this cultural anthropologist thinks is best for them ?

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    ...why not let the people keep the money they pay in taxes and spend it on what they want, rather than what this cultural anthropologist thinks is best for them ?
     
    I've been asking that for decades. The answer I've found is that the big business socialists, like the guys who supported FDR (while also funding Hitler and Stalin), aks the Red millionaires won't have it that way.

    Ya wanna read about just one pig of the sort I'm alluding to? If so, I hope you have a strong stomach.

    This unctuous hagiography of Swope the General Electric money bag friend of FDR and supporter of the Nazis offers a few hints about the scum at the top. The "Swope Plan" was a fascistic-communistic proposal to concentrate wealth and power in the hands of a few at the top.

    https://www.immigrantentrepreneurship.org/entry.php?rec=61

    Here's more.


    We must examine the roles of the Morgan and Chase Banks in World War II, specifically their collaboration with the Nazis in France while a major war was raging.

    In other words, the links between New York international bankers and major historical events, find a provable pattern of subsidy and political manipulation. Looking at the broad array of facts we find persistent recurrence of the same names: Owen Young, Gerard Swope, Hjalmar Schacht, Bernard Baruch, etc.; the same international banks: J.P. Morgan, Guaranty Trust, Chase Bank; and the same location in New York: usually 120 Broadway. This group of international bankers backed the Bolshevik Revolution and subsequently profited from the establishment of a Soviet Russia. This group backed Roosevelt and profited from New Deal socialism. This group also backed Hitler and certainly profited from the German armament in the 1930's.

    http://nstarzone.com/HITLER.html

     

    Spartacus also has some worthwhile info on Swope, naturally hagiographic, but worth knowing. http://spartacus-educational.com/USAswope.htm
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A nice article, based on some good research, which concisely depicts the disaster the USA has created for itself and the world. Yet the author never comes to grips with the underlying causes, some of which are so obvious that almost every single prior poster has noted them. I suspect that this is not deliberate on her part but rather entirely unconscious. She has been so thoroughly marinated in the nonsense that permeates her particular field and the institution where she currently works that she literally cannot articulate, let alone come to grips with or study, the underlying causes of the USA’s insane diplomatic and military policies.

    I will point out to her that, while she chooses primarily to malign Mr. Trump for our current evils, he actually inherited these from his predecessors, most particularly the insanely bellicose policies of our previous Secretary of State, Hilary Rodham Clinton. During his campaign, Mr. Trump promised to ratchet down these policies while Ms. Clinton promised to expand US wars. Mr. Trump reneged on his promises but I suspect this is due more to the power of the deep state, neocons, the Israeli fifth column in this country, and other elements of the establishment than to Mr. Trump’s desires and inclinations.

    I wonder who the author voted for in the last election.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ilyana_Rozumova
    Powerful article with brilliant sequencing and logical conclusion even with not many PHD words. And she is not even reporter.
    There is a blame of the Military that I am not willing to endorse.
    Country is most influenced by philosophers, and led by the government.
    I did notice that there are quite a numbers of philosophers here who could contribute to put the country on the right path. There is a little bit of bickering here but that could be suppressed.
    This is the best philosophical site on internet and it should become the most prominent seeker of the truth and most powerful decider in what is right and what is wrong.
    So I am calling on all philosophers to get to it and start working on it.
    Lets get serious.

    I wish to add this!
    It would be great help if every commentator would put a title on his/hers comment.
    The title would indicate which point the commentator is trying to prove or disprove.
    That would be beneficial to readers that could pass over the comment, particularly the long ones that need to be read half way to find out what it is all about.
    And that would be beneficial to editors who are eventually deciding which comment to keep and which to delete.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Americans have a short historical memory. Anything that happened over ten years ago is ancient history. Everyone’s forgotten 9/11 and the Iraq war. If we were a less stupid country people might actually be angry that we’re now allies with al-Qaeda.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    If we were a less stupid country people might actually be angry that we’re now allies with al-Qaeda.
     
    If we were an even less stupid country people might actually be angry that we were once allies with Stalin and have been allies of the gangster state of Israel for decades and supporters of Zio-freaks since ~50 years before that.

    And if we were an even less stupid country people might actually be angry that we let Eastern European gangster "immigrants" and their progeny take over our banks, industry, schooling and government around a century ago.

    Appeasing those arse-wipes has earned us the contempt of nearly everyone, including wide awake 'Merkins.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jacques sheete

    Democrat pols have made the decisions we have to live with.
     
    It's a bipartisan ram shaft on us prols and has been since about forever.

    “[Teddy]Roosevelt then said : "Pettigrew, you know the two old parties are just alike. They are both controlled by the same influences…”

    - R. F. Pettigrew, “Imperial Washington,” The story of American Public life from 1870 to 1920 (1922), p 234
    https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt/search?q1=amiable;id=yale.39002002948025;view=1up;seq=7;start=1;sz=10;page=search;orient=0

     

    Yep, when “Dubya” invaded Iraq with no plan whatsoever to impose order after destroying the place, I was flabbergasted. He actually thought Iraq would instantly become a functioning townhall-style democracy. What an idiot.
    Saddam Hussein and his sons Uday and Qusay were preferable to the aftermath of Dubya’s stupidity. That shows the whole thing was unjustified, among other data points.
    Hah! I just realized Uday and Qusay Hussein were a better option than “Dubya”!
    John Kerry and Hillary Clinton were totally on board with that program, when it mattered prior to pulling the trigger.
    Then Hillary effectively ordered the murder of Khadafy (sp?) long after Khadafy had ceased to be an issue. Heck, he complied with our demands. Fat lot of good that did him.
    Donkey or Elephant, same bad results.

    Many of us had hopes The Donald could extract us from the endless war mess. At least he speaks out about the lives, limbs, blood and treasure wasted. At least he has not done a Syria invasion as the bloodthirsty neocons want. Maybe he can still do something decent about the mess. I wonder about the bombing-ISIS-campaign. Very difficult to find good information regarding our activities in all those war zones.

    Your historical T.R. quote from the 1922 source is most informative. A long term problem indeed.

    Read More
    • Agree: jacques sheete
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Your historical T.R. quote from the 1922 source is most informative.
     
    Thank you, I have several others.

    Here's a couple more you may enjoy.

    Blind and deaf, yet she understood the scam. Note the dates.

    “Our democracy is but a name. We vote? What does that mean? It means that we choose between two bodies of real, though not avowed, autocrats. We choose between Tweedledum and Tweedledee.… “
    -Helen Keller,
    Letter published in the Manchester Advertiser (3 March 1911), quoted in A People's History of the United States (1980) page 345.


    “Are not the dominant parties managed by the ruling classes, that is, the propertied classes, solely for the profit and privilege of the few?

    They use us millions to help them into power. They tell us like so many children that our safety lies in voting for them. They toss us crumbs of concession to make us believe that they are working in our interest. “

    -Helen Keller,OUT OF THE DARK, LETTER TO AN ENGLISH WOMAN- SUFFRAGIST* Copyright, 1907 http://archive.org/stream/outdarkessaysle01kellgoog/outdarkessaysle01kellgoog_djvu.txt

     

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “I don’t mean to suggest that no one cares about America’s never-ending wars, just that, 17 years after the war on terror began, it’s a topic that seems to fire relatively few of us up, much less send us into the streets, Vietnam-style, to protest.”

    Seriously, there’s no upside to opposing the war. Your family and friends might wonder if you are soft on terror, at worst, but are much more likely to not want to be on the same watch-lists as you undoubtedly are. All that domestic spying is indeed having the chilling effect it was undoubtedly designed to have.

    “The fact is that those wars are approaching the end of their second decade and yet most of us don’t even think of ourselves as ‘at war.’”

    Indeed. We’ve done such a good job of spinning mass murders regardless of the perpetrators’ backgrounds into an ordinary paet of American life that there is little reason to think of any attacks on the “Homeland” having been perpetrated in at least a decade.

    “… though, if we had invested such funds in more cancer research …”

    Money on Cancer research would have been totally wasted: Decades of cancer research have found a cure for precisely zero cancer types.

    “… or the rebuilding of America’s infrastructure (among other things, Amtrak trains might not be having such frequent deadly crashes).”

    Would have been money better spent, but it makes the wrong sort of people richer.

    “… extent to which immigrant workers in the war zones of Iraq and Afghanistan are exploited. From countries like Nepal, Colombia, and the Philippines, they work for the U.S. military and its private contractors doing jobs like cooking, cleaning, and acting as security guards. Our report documented the kinds of servitude and the range of human rights abuses they regularly face.”

    Interesting finding. So we are a slave empire like that of the Romans. We see how that ultimately worked out.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ilyana_Rozumova
    Powerful article with brilliant sequencing and logical conclusion even with not many PHD words. And she is not even reporter.
    There is a blame of the Military that I am not willing to endorse.
    Country is most influenced by philosophers, and led by the government.
    I did notice that there are quite a numbers of philosophers here who could contribute to put the country on the right path. There is a little bit of bickering here but that could be suppressed.
    This is the best philosophical site on internet and it should become the most prominent seeker of the truth and most powerful decider in what is right and what is wrong.
    So I am calling on all philosophers to get to it and start working on it.
    Lets get serious.

    I did notice that there are quite a numbers of philosophers here who could contribute to put the country on the right path.

    No such thing will ever happen.

    There are reasons why Socrates and Plato (to name just two) refused to get involved with politics, and it wasn’t fear but futility that kept ‘em out. Even then, we all know what happened to Socrates. JC too.

    I suspect we’re all better of waiting for the Second Coming as long as we don’t plan on holding our collective breath or expect too much!

    PS:

    There is a blame of the Military that I am not willing to endorse.

    That’s why nothing will ever change. Now, go and repent. And wait.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Erebus


    I did notice that there are quite a numbers of philosophers here who could contribute to put the country on the right path.
     
    No such thing will ever happen.
     
    Well Jacques, it depends on one's definition of "philosophy". It was "Philosophers", under the rubric of "Grand Strategists", that got us into this mess, and a couple have popped up that may just get us at least part of the way out. Inertia being what it is, the latter have an uphill battle, but if one takes a broad view it looks like we may actually be past the tipping point.

    Anyhow, here's a thumbnail sketch of how/why I think we got here and who led us. Dick Cheney may have branded the "War on Terror (that) wouldn't end in our lifetime", but however happily he and they profited from it, neither he nor his friends in the MIC or Congress invented it. It takes deep-thinkers to formulate coherent ideological underpinnings for a war against no definable threat, no identified enemy, on no identifiable battlefield, or even identifiable theatre. Open-ended war anywhere, nowhere, everywhere, against everyone and no-one, is not easy to justify.

    The War on Terror is the product of a group of intellectual heavy-lifters in the bowels of the Pentagon, working on "emerging threats" and "force restructuring" under Adm. Art Cebrowski in the '90s. While it has a tangential connection to "counter-terrorism", this new type of war has everything to do with "prevent(ing) the re-emergence of a new rival", the No.1 objective of American foreign policy since Wolfowitz, and a then emerging philosophy of war best stated by one of its most vocal proponents. To whit, the War on Terror that began in Afghanistan in Oct, 2001 and would soon move to Iraq marked the "... historical tipping point--the moment when Washington [took] real ownership of strategic security in the age of globalization".

    At bottom, Globalization with American Characteristics (GAC) is the Great Project, the over-arching paradigm within which all the developed world's think-tankers and policy wonks live and work, and in which their counterparts in the developing world work to join. In the mid '90s, the recognition that American power could not itself force GAC on the entire world forced some introspection. Initially formulated under the mentorship of Cebrowski, T. P. M. Barnett went on to create his "Core-Gap" theory of how GAC could continue to develop and what use of military force would best contribute to that development.

    In a nutshell, the theory's basic tenet is that the long developing Globalization was geo-political-economic reality, an inexorable world-historical process that was born centuries ago, and America's recent ownership of that process (creating GAC) was its greatest civilizational achievement. Barnett calls it "... greatest foreign policy achievement in history – namely, the rapid and planet-wide spread of our economic source-code (aka, globalization)". The failure of so grand a vision, the vision that created and/or tuned all of the world's significant institutions, would literally mean TEOTWAWKI.

    The types of military force configurations, strategies and tactics that would best underpin and expand the spread of GAC, and ensure that it retained both its American characteristics and control came to be sold to the public under the meme “War on Terror”. 9/11 was its kick-off party.

    Alas, GAC was not quite "planet-wide" yet, and much of the world has yet to see, much less enjoy the benefits of this wonderful trend. The "Core", basically the OECD countries, are thoroughly embedded in the GAC process, but there are lots of laggards, and some may never get there. The pre-eminent function of the USM is to see to it that these laggards and outsiders, the “Gap" countries, are prevented from disrupting the process, and where possible to be brought into it. If their socio-political conditions make that difficult/impossible, they are to be broken so they can't disrupt the great world-historical trend. Whatever their status, if they have anything valuable - minerals, energy, water - these must be made available to the Core and near-Core, even if they have to be maintained in a socio-politically chaotic state while their resources are being "liberated". That is why the USM abandoned large formations and moved towards much greater use of small SF formations, drones, proxies, and why they're active in ~100 countries.

    Barnett's thinking held great sway in Washington's brain-trusts before, and in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, and continues to drive much of what we see happening. The jaw-dropping Ameri-centrism of this heady program explains the hubris, the strategic and analytic myopia, the disastrous procurement blunders, and explains completely the so-called "failures" in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and soon in a country near you.

    It also explains the security and military doctrinal documents that were recently released making explicit America's rivalry with China & Russia. Though these countries are fully embedded in Globalization per se, they wish to re-define it, replacing the Ameri-centric component with a multipolar structure that's tolerant of nations not much impressed with American "culture", however much they like the “economic source-code”. They want the baby, not the bath water, and they've developed the economic and military heft to present a serious challenge. More dangerously, they've formulated coherent visions and are executing the supporting policies that many countries previously enamoured with America's exceptionalism find attractive.

    That, of course, is anathema to the formulators and guiders of American military and geo-political doctrines. Fundamentally, these documents recognize that the East-West spread of Globalization is all but complete, but is spinning out of American control and is now at risk of being partitioned into those old spheres of influence that will again come to define the limits of American influence. They want it back, but the authors are behind the curve. Already, the East-West thrust has largely been abandoned but for some rear-guard chest beating in E. Europe, ME and the E&SCSs.

    In its place, a new North-South axis has opened in the form of migration. The Core's deep-thinkers, having recognized Russian & Chinese pre-eminence on the East-West axis, have shifted their gaze due south. A new twist in the game is afoot.

    Barnett's Core-Gap theory early in the 21st century can be read here:
    http://thomaspmbarnett.squarespace.com/globlogization/2010/8/17/blast-from-my-past-the-pentagons-new-map-2003.html#ixzz57HDXs7lh

    Barnett's more recent thinking, with thoughts on why the US won't be building any walls soon, can be read here.
    http://thomaspmbarnett.squarespace.com/globlogization/2016/2/18/americas-post-oil-grand-strategy.html#ixzz57HbsBKqW

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    Another touching story of how a young adult became an anti-war propagandist. Eventually turning in work for Tom's Dispatch 'cause all she learned. Now you know how to resist. Right children? lolz! All zombies vote for peace because it will be on the ballot tomorrow.


    Read the anti-federalist papers and you will see that most Americans during and after the revolution hated soldiers. The had seen soldiers raping their wives and daughters, burning their houses and barns and crops, and much more. They knew that men who agree to kill for a paycheck do other bad things like raping and looting. Before WWI, most opposed the troops, but the Government went to war any way. Same with WWII. After that, movies kicked in and "learned" the zombies about the wonderfulness of war and killing and how American soldiers kill with love in their hearts.

    Great comment. Bless you for bringing forward a slice of the truth.

    Others with military experience loathe the bureaucrats with guns as well.

    As soon as the government has the money and the soldiers, instead of fulfilling their promises to defend their subjects from foreign enemies, and to arrange things for their benefit, they do all they can to provoke the neighbouring nations and to produce war; and they not only do not promote the internal well-being of their people, but they ruin and corrupt them.

    A few typos, but otherwise a fine summary: Tolstoy, Slavery of Our Times, Chap 8, 11 July, 1900

    http://ebooks.gutenberg.us/WorldeBookLibrary.com/slaverytol.htm#1_0_7

    I wonder what he knew about what happened to the people during Shay’s rebellion. I bet he knew about Sherman’s scorched earth policy too.

    People often ask if the military would fire on US citizens…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Learning about the Whiskey rebellion and the reason for the whiskey tax imposed on the frontiers people turned me against the founders forever.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Hi Stephanie,

    In general, am pleased with your role with the Costs of War project and your “passionate” anti-war commitment.

    As described in your article, and speaking with respect to your PhD-level of knowledge, I am inclined to figure that your political “dinner party” conversations are muffled, and the typical “blank stare” partier-reactions would prompt me to either go & talk with a bartender/waitress, frequent the lavatory, or depart for the closest Dunkin’ Donuts.

    At any rate, below, Brother Nathanael Kapner forsakes discussion on tragic Brazil slum conditions but he does “clock in” with vital information on a “war no one notices.”

    As you know, Stephanie, Jewish Corporate Media honchos support and profit by perpetuating the expensive & immoral U.S. Wars of (!) Terror. In fact, they tactfully TOLERATE the level as to what you do and desire to accomplish.

    Thank you!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twodees Partain
    The author is a TD libtard. She isn't "politically naive", she's taking facts and using them to lead a reader to a conclusion that favors her political agenda. Holding out hope for libtards is a waste of emotion. Even if they come to reject liberalism, they will still be 'tards.

    Thanks, 2DsP!

    …she’s taking facts and using them to lead a reader to a conclusion that favors her political agenda.

    Probably so, but she still sounds naive; her attempt at propaganda is way too transparent.

    Everything, including news, propaganda, and even boolsheete these days is degraded. It’s so bad that I’m starting to enjoy the madness!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    I know what you mean. I even fear that I might become a connoisseur of the most ridiculous.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Powerful article with brilliant sequencing and logical conclusion even with not many PHD words. And she is not even reporter.
    There is a blame of the Military that I am not willing to endorse.
    Country is most influenced by philosophers, and led by the government.
    I did notice that there are quite a numbers of philosophers here who could contribute to put the country on the right path. There is a little bit of bickering here but that could be suppressed.
    This is the best philosophical site on internet and it should become the most prominent seeker of the truth and most powerful decider in what is right and what is wrong.
    So I am calling on all philosophers to get to it and start working on it.
    Lets get serious.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    I did notice that there are quite a numbers of philosophers here who could contribute to put the country on the right path.
     
    No such thing will ever happen.

    There are reasons why Socrates and Plato (to name just two) refused to get involved with politics, and it wasn't fear but futility that kept 'em out. Even then, we all know what happened to Socrates. JC too.

    I suspect we're all better of waiting for the Second Coming as long as we don't plan on holding our collective breath or expect too much!

    PS:


    There is a blame of the Military that I am not willing to endorse.
     
    That's why nothing will ever change. Now, go and repent. And wait.
    , @Ilyana_Rozumova
    I wish to add this!
    It would be great help if every commentator would put a title on his/hers comment.
    The title would indicate which point the commentator is trying to prove or disprove.
    That would be beneficial to readers that could pass over the comment, particularly the long ones that need to be read half way to find out what it is all about.
    And that would be beneficial to editors who are eventually deciding which comment to keep and which to delete.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Another touching story of how a young adult became an anti-war propagandist. Eventually turning in work for Tom’s Dispatch ’cause all she learned. Now you know how to resist. Right children? lolz! All zombies vote for peace because it will be on the ballot tomorrow.

    Read the anti-federalist papers and you will see that most Americans during and after the revolution hated soldiers. The had seen soldiers raping their wives and daughters, burning their houses and barns and crops, and much more. They knew that men who agree to kill for a paycheck do other bad things like raping and looting. Before WWI, most opposed the troops, but the Government went to war any way. Same with WWII. After that, movies kicked in and “learned” the zombies about the wonderfulness of war and killing and how American soldiers kill with love in their hearts.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    Great comment. Bless you for bringing forward a slice of the truth.

    Others with military experience loathe the bureaucrats with guns as well.

    As soon as the government has the money and the soldiers, instead of fulfilling their promises to defend their subjects from foreign enemies, and to arrange things for their benefit, they do all they can to provoke the neighbouring nations and to produce war; and they not only do not promote the internal well-being of their people, but they ruin and corrupt them.

    A few typos, but otherwise a fine summary: Tolstoy, Slavery of Our Times, Chap 8, 11 July, 1900

    http://ebooks.gutenberg.us/WorldeBookLibrary.com/slaverytol.htm#1_0_7

     
    I wonder what he knew about what happened to the people during Shay's rebellion. I bet he knew about Sherman's scorched earth policy too.

    People often ask if the military would fire on US citizens...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Visiting congressional offices had no result. Oh my, what a surprise.

    We know what the costs of war are, and we know that these costs are paid by taxpayers or borrowed, but what isn’t publicized is where those dollars go, into whose pockets and bank accounts, because that’s the real reason for these wars. If the public got a good look at the lifestyles of the rich and not-so-famous members of the military-industrial-congressional-media complex compared to their own financial struggles it might do some good.

    WAR IS A RACKET. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.” — General Smedley Butler, USMC, double recipient of the Congressional Medal of Honor.

    Read More
    • Agree: jacques sheete
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jacques sheete

    The author is sincere however she seems quite politically naive.
    And — a little behind the times
     
    I agree, but I also think there is hope for her.

    God bless her!

    The author is a TD libtard. She isn’t “politically naive”, she’s taking facts and using them to lead a reader to a conclusion that favors her political agenda. Holding out hope for libtards is a waste of emotion. Even if they come to reject liberalism, they will still be ‘tards.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    Thanks, 2DsP!

    ...she’s taking facts and using them to lead a reader to a conclusion that favors her political agenda.
     
    Probably so, but she still sounds naive; her attempt at propaganda is way too transparent.

    Everything, including news, propaganda, and even boolsheete these days is degraded. It's so bad that I'm starting to enjoy the madness!
    , @Anon
    You presume too much. I've found about 100 versions on line of what your TD might mean and none of them fit well. So what does it mean in your sandpit?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The image accompanying the article is spot on – bucks lined up like gravestones.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ChuckOrloski
    Jacques Sheete's tuition-free lesson to the thirty-some Co-Director, Stephanie Savell: "The truth is closer to this, the U.S. military is now taking some sort of terrorist action against another group of defenseless people. The US, and its handler, Israel, are the worst terrorist organizations on the planet, by far. They do not fight terrorism; they promote it."

    Hi Jacques,

    Given her spirited Ivy attempt to provoke a strictly "pocket-book based" repulsed U.R. reader reaction, I sense Ms. Savell shall be measurably taken aback by your focused take, which addressed the immorality of endless (since conception) U.S.A. military wars.

    (Note: Your educated reference to Founding Father "Village Destroyer" is not lost on me, a resident of busted city of Scranton)

    Nevertheless, shortly "Happy Hour" commences around college towns, her staff will drink toast to this article, Stephanie's salary shall continue, and Brown student tuition rises.

    But I believe perhaps tonight, in her French heart, she knows you pierced it, Jacques.

    So below I depart with a video-link to Secretary of Offense "Mad Dog" Mattis's address as to how the ZUS War of Terror shall be downsized and greater war proceeds.

    https://youtu.be/eyYHNnrQNUM

    Thanks, Jacques!

    I sense Ms. Savell shall be measurably taken aback by your focused take…

    It certainly would be interesting to know how she would react, but I suspect that she won’t even see it, and if she does, she won’t quite “get it” for a few more years.

    However, maybe it’s a start.

    As for your video, thanks. I was wondering what happened to all the anti-Muslim hysteria lately.

    Boy, is that guy FoS! Everything he’s saying about the other guys has been done by us for decades if not centuries. How can he say that stuff without throwing up? These cats are sick.Godddddammm adolescent rhetoric at best, too!

    Read More
    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
    With reason, Jacques Sheete says: "... but I suspect that she (Stephanie) won’t even see it, and if she does, she won’t quite “get it” for a few more years."

    Hi Jacques,

    Regrettably, in order to protect her salary and reputation in Brown's uptown academic community, a price is exacted upon Ms. Savell's published actions.

    At this point in time, she does not want to model her life work on, let me say, that of "boots-on-the-ground," peace activist / pursuant jailbird, Kathy Kelly.

    Maintenance of her respected image as a half-step "peace activist" prohibits Stephanie from "getting it" and freely communicating what is in-front of her nose.

    In compliance with the silent but pervasive Zio-censorship mandate, I assume the "Costs of War Project" Director can fire the PhD co-Director for "getting it" and unloading the chamber on what she really knows.

    Maybe she will avoid reading & responding to this lively U.R. comment thread, Jacques?
    Hm. Hard to predict but given ego damage done, I think she will.

    Were I 30-something & fashionably donning Dennis Rodman-style dinner party shoes, maybe I'd clam up & join "Happy Hour" proceedings.

    Doubtless, co-Director Savell is well briefed about risks and "costs" of her speaking from-the-hip?

    If not, she can immediately enter U.R. archives and learn how "The American Conservative" (T.A.C.) house pussies canned Philip Giraldi in response to his feral but truthful words.

    P.S. Taken from academia lore, and to comply with Director Ilyana Rozumova's expressed will, I bestow the following title upon my long comment: "Either publish how we want or perish."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jacques sheete
    You were doing extremely well until this.:

    I had worked on for several months: a map of all the places where, in one fashion or another, the U.S. military is now taking some sort of action against terrorism —
     
    The truth is closer to this, the U.S. military is now taking some sort of terrorist action against another group of defenseless people. The US, and its handler, Israel, are the worst terrorist organizations on the planet, by far. They do not fight terrorism; they promote it.

    Again, you were doing well, and seem to be on a good learning trajectory. To keep it up avoid making the usual assumptions and repeating the standard garbage. If you desire to approach the truth, you must question everything and get used to inverting everything some "authority" tells you.

    Mercy Otis Warren would be proud.

    Wherever an army is established, it introduces a revolution in manners, corrupts the morals, propagates every species of vice, and degrades the human character.

    -Mercy Otis Warren, Revolution-era historian.

    History of the Rise, Progress, and Termination of the American Revolution vol. 1, Ch3, 1805
     

    Jacques Sheete’s tuition-free lesson to the thirty-some Co-Director, Stephanie Savell: “The truth is closer to this, the U.S. military is now taking some sort of terrorist action against another group of defenseless people. The US, and its handler, Israel, are the worst terrorist organizations on the planet, by far. They do not fight terrorism; they promote it.”

    Hi Jacques,

    Given her spirited Ivy attempt to provoke a strictly “pocket-book based” repulsed U.R. reader reaction, I sense Ms. Savell shall be measurably taken aback by your focused take, which addressed the immorality of endless (since conception) U.S.A. military wars.

    (Note: Your educated reference to Founding Father “Village Destroyer” is not lost on me, a resident of busted city of Scranton)

    Nevertheless, shortly “Happy Hour” commences around college towns, her staff will drink toast to this article, Stephanie’s salary shall continue, and Brown student tuition rises.

    But I believe perhaps tonight, in her French heart, she knows you pierced it, Jacques.

    So below I depart with a video-link to Secretary of Offense “Mad Dog” Mattis’s address as to how the ZUS War of Terror shall be downsized and greater war proceeds.

    Thanks, Jacques!

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    I sense Ms. Savell shall be measurably taken aback by your focused take...
     
    It certainly would be interesting to know how she would react, but I suspect that she won't even see it, and if she does, she won't quite "get it" for a few more years.

    However, maybe it's a start.

    As for your video, thanks. I was wondering what happened to all the anti-Muslim hysteria lately.

    Boy, is that guy FoS! Everything he's saying about the other guys has been done by us for decades if not centuries. How can he say that stuff without throwing up? These cats are sick.Godddddammm adolescent rhetoric at best, too!

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I have always suspected that the US war machine is self-financing and maybe even “profitable”. The cornerstone of US prosperity is Bretton Woods: the dollar as world reserve currency. That allows the US economy to continue to function even though hollowed out, financialized, and with a crippling burden of debt. That economic dominance requires global political dominance and power, as the saying goes, comes out of the barrel of a gun. Thus, the US not only needs to have the mightiest military machine on earth, it must prove its willingness to use it by actually waging war more or less permanently and, in particular, by beating off any challenge to its dominant position. Failure to do that renders the position of the dollar unsustainable, which would probably set off a Soviet-style implosion of the US economy and a 1929-style world economic crisis. Thus, cutting US military spending would not mean that the money now spent on it would be available for other purposes. That wealth just wouldn’t be there at all. The US is caught in a dilemma therefore. It cannot maintain the current levels of military spending but failing to maintain them will bring the whole house down!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dissident X

    ... the whole house down!
     
    It is certainly unavoidable now.
    The petro-yuan is coming, thus the fall of the petro-dollar, following the years the dominant position within the global economy has been so absurdly abused, is inevitable.

    The only way to stop it is with war. However, the only war that the empire can even come out as good as the other guys is in more or less mutual obliteration in nuclear war.

    One way or another, it does not look good for the empire, but most notably for the citizens of the empire.

    If it were mechanically possible, within the system, to change the direction/overthrow the tyranny of the financial elite/exceptional, perhaps it could be done with a mere ceremonial amount of destruction, but it does NOT look like that is possible.

    I noticed the wisdom of Donald Trump NOT talking about gun control in the wake of the (latest) Florida tragedy. It is wise because people know that they'll becoming for the guns. Because soon people will realize the utter contempt the people in office have for the citizens, and the entire corrupt system that puts them there and keeps them there. People know it, even if the intense propaganda still manages to keep it out of the waking consciousness of the majority; they still know!
    And they therefore know, even if only at a sub-conscious level, that they are going to needs their guns!

    The empire is in crisis and already in an unstoppable state of collapse, the only question is how much of everybody else will they take in their death-throws?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jacques sheete

    The author is sincere however she seems quite politically naive.
    And — a little behind the times
     
    I agree, but I also think there is hope for her.

    God bless her!

    Yes, fair enough.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I’m far from being a Trumpster, but there’s entirely too much emphasis on and bashing of, him in this article. None of the things this author is validly noting is new with Trump; it’s been going on since the beginning.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @DanFromCt
    I’m a combat vet from the Vietnam era and find it ominous when I use my VA card for a store discount and get thanked “for my service” by well-meaning people who have no inkling of how deeply their very thoughts are scripted by the media and Hollywood, who just yesterday were calling anyone in uniform a “baby killer.”

    Anyone in military uniform today, however, is called a “hero” on TV. Such nonsense is part of the grinning mockery of our military and most definitely not any sort of praise, making fools out of the cretins who’d risk their lives or put up with military life to serve the neocon’s mass-murdering agenda.

    Anyone in military uniform today, however, is called a “hero” …

    While that’s bad enough, it seems that anyone in any type of uniform seems to be labelled a hero.

    I agree that there’s something deeply disturbing about that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sarah Toga
    I had noticed in recent years the shift from the Vietnam era hostility against the military to the "thank you for your service" public manners ethic.
    I wondered how our masters in Hollywood and other cultural control towers had made that huge shift and made it stick.
    TPTB were formerly rabidly anti-military, i. e., W. Clinton loathed the military, etc. BHO was no hawk. Maybe DiFi got tons of military contract $$ for the complex in SoCal.
    I label them TPTB because the Clintons have ruled and continue to rule the Democratic Party and rule the Media, since 1992.
    The national GOP is effectively a fractured nebulous non-entity.
    "Dubya" is a fool.
    Democrat pols have made the decisions we have to live with. They had about 8 years majority, free rein from 2006 to 2014 to do anything they wanted.
    The net result is ton$ of $pending, 1,000's of White volunteer soldiers killed, maimed, PTSD'd.
    And we import more hostile foreigners (so-called immigration) than ever before. Then pay them to dawdle and scheme terror violence while on welfare. As the debt piles up.
    Stupid policies all around.
    Maybe Brown U could have a stupid policies studies center. But those academics and statists could never figure out they are the biggest problem.

    Democrat pols have made the decisions we have to live with.

    It’s a bipartisan ram shaft on us prols and has been since about forever.

    “[Teddy]Roosevelt then said : “Pettigrew, you know the two old parties are just alike. They are both controlled by the same influences…”

    - R. F. Pettigrew, “Imperial Washington,” The story of American Public life from 1870 to 1920 (1922), p 234

    https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt/search?q1=amiable;id=yale.39002002948025;view=1up;seq=7;start=1;sz=10;page=search;orient=0

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sarah Toga
    Yep, when "Dubya" invaded Iraq with no plan whatsoever to impose order after destroying the place, I was flabbergasted. He actually thought Iraq would instantly become a functioning townhall-style democracy. What an idiot.
    Saddam Hussein and his sons Uday and Qusay were preferable to the aftermath of Dubya's stupidity. That shows the whole thing was unjustified, among other data points.
    Hah! I just realized Uday and Qusay Hussein were a better option than "Dubya"!
    John Kerry and Hillary Clinton were totally on board with that program, when it mattered prior to pulling the trigger.
    Then Hillary effectively ordered the murder of Khadafy (sp?) long after Khadafy had ceased to be an issue. Heck, he complied with our demands. Fat lot of good that did him.
    Donkey or Elephant, same bad results.

    Many of us had hopes The Donald could extract us from the endless war mess. At least he speaks out about the lives, limbs, blood and treasure wasted. At least he has not done a Syria invasion as the bloodthirsty neocons want. Maybe he can still do something decent about the mess. I wonder about the bombing-ISIS-campaign. Very difficult to find good information regarding our activities in all those war zones.

    Your historical T.R. quote from the 1922 source is most informative. A long term problem indeed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @animalogic
    "The US, and its handler, Israel, are the worst terrorist organizations on the planet, by far. They do not fight terrorism; they promote it."
    You are quite right. The author is sincere however she seems quite politically naive.
    And -- a little behind the times: the US military & "Establishment" have moved on from " terrorism". Its back to the future: prime military orientation is to (near) peer competitors such as Russia & China.
    Perhaps we'll look back on the "anti-terror" period with a degree of fondness. Safe bet: the new orientation will be more expensive & more dangerous.

    The author is sincere however she seems quite politically naive.
    And — a little behind the times

    I agree, but I also think there is hope for her.

    God bless her!

    Read More
    • Replies: @animalogic
    Yes, fair enough.
    , @Twodees Partain
    The author is a TD libtard. She isn't "politically naive", she's taking facts and using them to lead a reader to a conclusion that favors her political agenda. Holding out hope for libtards is a waste of emotion. Even if they come to reject liberalism, they will still be 'tards.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sarah Toga
    I had noticed in recent years the shift from the Vietnam era hostility against the military to the "thank you for your service" public manners ethic.
    I wondered how our masters in Hollywood and other cultural control towers had made that huge shift and made it stick.
    TPTB were formerly rabidly anti-military, i. e., W. Clinton loathed the military, etc. BHO was no hawk. Maybe DiFi got tons of military contract $$ for the complex in SoCal.
    I label them TPTB because the Clintons have ruled and continue to rule the Democratic Party and rule the Media, since 1992.
    The national GOP is effectively a fractured nebulous non-entity.
    "Dubya" is a fool.
    Democrat pols have made the decisions we have to live with. They had about 8 years majority, free rein from 2006 to 2014 to do anything they wanted.
    The net result is ton$ of $pending, 1,000's of White volunteer soldiers killed, maimed, PTSD'd.
    And we import more hostile foreigners (so-called immigration) than ever before. Then pay them to dawdle and scheme terror violence while on welfare. As the debt piles up.
    Stupid policies all around.
    Maybe Brown U could have a stupid policies studies center. But those academics and statists could never figure out they are the biggest problem.

    I’m a combat vet from the Vietnam era and find it ominous when I use my VA card for a store discount and get thanked “for my service” by well-meaning people who have no inkling of how deeply their very thoughts are scripted by the media and Hollywood, who just yesterday were calling anyone in uniform a “baby killer.”

    Anyone in military uniform today, however, is called a “hero” on TV. Such nonsense is part of the grinning mockery of our military and most definitely not any sort of praise, making fools out of the cretins who’d risk their lives or put up with military life to serve the neocon’s mass-murdering agenda.

    Read More
    • Agree: Sarah Toga
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Anyone in military uniform today, however, is called a “hero” ...
     
    While that's bad enough, it seems that anyone in any type of uniform seems to be labelled a hero.

    I agree that there's something deeply disturbing about that.

    , @Z-man
    ..and 'jacques sheete'.
    My agree button doesn't work!! I agree. (Grin)
    , @Wayne
    Totally agree. I too are from the Vietnam era. I was attending college from 1970-4. As my father and grandfather served in WWII, I felt guilty for getting an education instead of enlisting. I now thank God I didn't.
    Having retired a couple of years ago I now substitute teach a few days a week. Thursday I was in a high school English class where the teacher had a bulletin board where students could place their names under different columns based on their post high school plans. There were quite a few names under "Entering the military." I didn't know whether weep or shout out "fools!"
    , @EliteCommInc.
    I appreciate your service. I appreciate the service you provided in Vietnam.

    I think you are mistaking a nod to your sacrifice as a member of service for support of the political agendas a service member is asked to serve in. The current use of the term also acknowledges that te Vietnam war era nonsense is over. Attacks on service members were largely unwarranted, not to mention attacking the US support for S. Vietnam.


    I would encourage you to embrace their thanks as an attempt assuage that for which there is no just repayment.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “The US, and its handler, Israel, are the worst terrorist organizations on the planet, by far. They do not fight terrorism; they promote it.”
    You are quite right. The author is sincere however she seems quite politically naive.
    And — a little behind the times: the US military & “Establishment” have moved on from ” terrorism”. Its back to the future: prime military orientation is to (near) peer competitors such as Russia & China.
    Perhaps we’ll look back on the “anti-terror” period with a degree of fondness. Safe bet: the new orientation will be more expensive & more dangerous.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    The author is sincere however she seems quite politically naive.
    And — a little behind the times
     
    I agree, but I also think there is hope for her.

    God bless her!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Lost me when she used the word “felt” in the opener

    Read More
    • Replies: @prusmc
    The money could have been spent to find a cure for cancer. When did I first hear that: when I was in Jr High School, and a teacher was bitching that Presudent JFK promised to send a man to the moon before 1970. The educators were
    just beginning to dip into the federal aid to education honey pot and the wanted more. Then in 1968 a disgusting creature initials HHH raved about the social programs that could be established with the "peace dividend". The Armed Forces became a hollow institution in the 70s.
    Then the Congress approved increased and effective military expenditures in 1980. However, each defense dollar was matched by a dollar for domestic causes. The same pattern is found today. The large and truthfully wasteful military increases have an even more useless counterpart being squandered for all levels of government.
    Are we over- committeed to the unnecessary? Of course. Is there tremendous inefficiency and graft in defense? We only see the tip if the
    Iceberg. Common ground established. What does this "NPO and NGO from Browne University have to offer? Nothing except "feel good" snark. I wonder if anyone knows what is the so of its' funding is and how muchit spends each year?
    Personally, hard to commiserate with the "bad paper" people, since no one has has been forced to serve since 1973 We had a saying "you draw your pay and you take your chances".
    An alternative to all the wondeful things that could be done with existing and projected military budget expenditures( agree there is unimaginable waste) how about this: why not let the people keep the money they pay in taxes and spend it on what they want, rather than what this cultural anthropologist thinks is best for them ?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • US military terrorism started early. For example, George Washington was a terrorist. Known to the Iroquois as Conotocarious or Village Destroyer.

    Orders of George Washington to General John Sullivan, at Head-Quarters May 31, 1779:

    But you will not by any means listen to any overture of peace before the total ruinment of their settlements is effected. Our future security will be in their inability to injure us and in the terror with which the severity of the chastisement they receive will inspire them.

    https://almostchosenpeople.wordpress.com/2010/09/17/washingtons-instructions-to-sullivan/

    Remember Lincoln’s unconstitutional war against Southern independence aka the War of the Terrorist Northern Bankers Against the Southern Planters.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I had noticed in recent years the shift from the Vietnam era hostility against the military to the “thank you for your service” public manners ethic.
    I wondered how our masters in Hollywood and other cultural control towers had made that huge shift and made it stick.
    TPTB were formerly rabidly anti-military, i. e., W. Clinton loathed the military, etc. BHO was no hawk. Maybe DiFi got tons of military contract $$ for the complex in SoCal.
    I label them TPTB because the Clintons have ruled and continue to rule the Democratic Party and rule the Media, since 1992.
    The national GOP is effectively a fractured nebulous non-entity.
    “Dubya” is a fool.
    Democrat pols have made the decisions we have to live with. They had about 8 years majority, free rein from 2006 to 2014 to do anything they wanted.
    The net result is ton$ of $pending, 1,000′s of White volunteer soldiers killed, maimed, PTSD’d.
    And we import more hostile foreigners (so-called immigration) than ever before. Then pay them to dawdle and scheme terror violence while on welfare. As the debt piles up.
    Stupid policies all around.
    Maybe Brown U could have a stupid policies studies center. But those academics and statists could never figure out they are the biggest problem.

    Read More
    • Replies: @DanFromCt
    I’m a combat vet from the Vietnam era and find it ominous when I use my VA card for a store discount and get thanked “for my service” by well-meaning people who have no inkling of how deeply their very thoughts are scripted by the media and Hollywood, who just yesterday were calling anyone in uniform a “baby killer.”

    Anyone in military uniform today, however, is called a “hero” on TV. Such nonsense is part of the grinning mockery of our military and most definitely not any sort of praise, making fools out of the cretins who’d risk their lives or put up with military life to serve the neocon’s mass-murdering agenda.
    , @jacques sheete

    Democrat pols have made the decisions we have to live with.
     
    It's a bipartisan ram shaft on us prols and has been since about forever.

    “[Teddy]Roosevelt then said : "Pettigrew, you know the two old parties are just alike. They are both controlled by the same influences…”

    - R. F. Pettigrew, “Imperial Washington,” The story of American Public life from 1870 to 1920 (1922), p 234
    https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt/search?q1=amiable;id=yale.39002002948025;view=1up;seq=7;start=1;sz=10;page=search;orient=0

     

    , @NoseytheDuke
    Articles like this from the vile and disgusting Yahoo?

    https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/russian-military-contractors-reportedly-tried-045652699.html

    The headline used the word whooped where is should have said murdered and it left out that the US has no business in Syria.

    I hate to say it but the American people will pay dearly for this at some point (many are already) and in a variety of ways.
    , @Twodees Partain
    It was easy for Dubya's bosses to get him on board for Iraq. They simply told him that Saddam tried to kill his daddy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • You were doing extremely well until this.:

    I had worked on for several months: a map of all the places where, in one fashion or another, the U.S. military is now taking some sort of action against terrorism —

    The truth is closer to this, the U.S. military is now taking some sort of terrorist action against another group of defenseless people. The US, and its handler, Israel, are the worst terrorist organizations on the planet, by far. They do not fight terrorism; they promote it.

    Again, you were doing well, and seem to be on a good learning trajectory. To keep it up avoid making the usual assumptions and repeating the standard garbage. If you desire to approach the truth, you must question everything and get used to inverting everything some “authority” tells you.

    Mercy Otis Warren would be proud.

    Wherever an army is established, it introduces a revolution in manners, corrupts the morals, propagates every species of vice, and degrades the human character.

    -Mercy Otis Warren, Revolution-era historian.

    History of the Rise, Progress, and Termination of the American Revolution vol. 1, Ch3, 1805

    Read More
    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
    Jacques Sheete's tuition-free lesson to the thirty-some Co-Director, Stephanie Savell: "The truth is closer to this, the U.S. military is now taking some sort of terrorist action against another group of defenseless people. The US, and its handler, Israel, are the worst terrorist organizations on the planet, by far. They do not fight terrorism; they promote it."

    Hi Jacques,

    Given her spirited Ivy attempt to provoke a strictly "pocket-book based" repulsed U.R. reader reaction, I sense Ms. Savell shall be measurably taken aback by your focused take, which addressed the immorality of endless (since conception) U.S.A. military wars.

    (Note: Your educated reference to Founding Father "Village Destroyer" is not lost on me, a resident of busted city of Scranton)

    Nevertheless, shortly "Happy Hour" commences around college towns, her staff will drink toast to this article, Stephanie's salary shall continue, and Brown student tuition rises.

    But I believe perhaps tonight, in her French heart, she knows you pierced it, Jacques.

    So below I depart with a video-link to Secretary of Offense "Mad Dog" Mattis's address as to how the ZUS War of Terror shall be downsized and greater war proceeds.

    https://youtu.be/eyYHNnrQNUM

    Thanks, Jacques!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • > Cultural Anthropology

    now ==there’s== parasitism on wheels

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Did I miss it, or did the author curiously fail to directly mention Israel / Jews responsibility in all of this madness.

    The True Cost of Parasite Israel
    Forced US taxpayers money to Israel goes far beyond the official numbers.

    http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-true-cost-of-israel/

    Fighting Israel’s Wars
    How the United States military has become Zionized

    http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/fighting-israels-wars/

    Pandering to Israel Has Got to Stop
    Pledges of loyalty to Israel are un-American

    http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/pandering-to-israel-has-got-to-stop/#comments

    America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars

    http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/americas-jews-are-driving-americas-wars/#comment-2012898

    Israel’s Money Machine
    Zionist Billionaires & US taxpayers keep on paying for parasite Israel

    http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/israels-money-machine/

    Israel’s Dirty Little Secret
    How it drives US policies exploiting a spineless Congress and White House

    http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/israels-dirty-little-secret/

    How to Bring Down the Elephant in the Room

    http://www.unz.com/tsaker/how-to-bring-down-the-elephant-in-the-room/

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Agree: Z-man
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Through the engagement of significant numbers of concerned citizens, the status quo of war making might be reversed, and the rising tide of the U.S. counterterror wars stemmed.

    Interesting.
    “Counterterror wars” but not wars in general. Like conventional regional wars just waiting to go nuclear.

    Probably because making case there would be a bit more difficult than “feel good” exercise as this one.

    Anyway….I wish the lady and the project good luck there.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I appreciate what she and others are doing. Our military is out of control and committing war crimes daily based on a false premise. When I try to tell my own family, I get groans and eye rolling. Please keep trying to educate the masses even if they don’t want to hear it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro
    Excellent work.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.