The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / By Spencer Quinn
 All Comments / By Spencer Quinn
    Here’s a dictum I have read now and again on the internet: “an organization that isn’t explicitly anti-Left will eventually be swallowed up by the Left.” Here’s another I am making up on the fly (although I am sure others have said it many times before): “an organization that isn’t explicitly anti-nonwhite will eventually be...
  • @Corvinus
    "Blacks are not only, on average, less intelligent than whites they also have less impulse control, a much shorter future-time orientation"...

    Actually, whites have a much shorter future-time orientation on average.

    http://akarlin.com/2012/08/why-russia-needs-a-strong-hand

    "a propensity for violence..."

    Poorer people regardless of race have an increased likelihood to engage in violence.

    "and much more promiscuous sexual behavior..."

    No, not quite.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/dec/19/young-white-men-uk-most-hated-social-group-public-attitudes

    https://psmag.com/social-justice/and-the-prize-for-promiscuity-goes-to-generation-x

    "all probably a result of evolving in a high disease load tropical environment."

    Sources or retract.

    "For example, it ought to be increasingly obvious to everyone that blacks simply should not have access to firearms."

    How would you rectify your proposal to the Second Amendment?

    "Blacks elect representatives (e.g., Hank Johnson, who does not know that islands are anchored to the seabed and fears that they can tip over) whose stupidity is so manifest that the notion that he ought to be voting on laws to which whites will be subject would be laughable if if weren’t so sad."

    A number of white people elected Donald Trump, whose stupidity is legendary.

    Oh, jeez, one of them.

    OK, let’s throw out everything you are arguing, and just concentrate on the IQ bell-curve difference and impulse control.

    What say you, defender 0f the Black agenda?

    Why should Whites have to carry the insufficient Black people as a burden throughout their years of schooling? Especially considering Blacks blatantly disrupt classes where some actually wish to, gasp, learn?

    Oh, yeah, lack of impulse control. Detroit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I do not understand why all of these comments and the article itself are so fixated on ancient history. National Review has tried to be a thought leader, though this article feels like the state of the art in psychometrics as of the 1950′s. It should be reasonably clear to all informed observers that the time for gene editing of a new extremely high g humanoid species is now rapidly approaching. Given current world populations trends a fairly large percentage of this new overlord genius species will be black. If we could all just start looking through the windshield and not the rear view mirror we could actually navigate ourselves to a better place.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Almost all people agree that the most intelligent people are some from Asia (Japanese, Singapur, Taiwan, China) Jews, and whites, and the people with lowest IQ are Africans, Muslims and some Latins like Mexicans. Then can someone explain why the Muslims and Mexicans are taking over the world? Muslims will take over all Europe, and Mexicans are taking over USA and Canada.
    Muslims and Mexicans dont have people with high IQ, in fact they are almost primitives, but they are becoming the Masters of the world because Asians and whites are not using their brains to stop mass immigration and invasions. Why nobody can find a solution? Are all studies on IQ wrong ?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @üeljang
    The determinative factor (or, shall I say, the "weakest link") appears to be white females. They cause higher rates of divorce regardless of the partner, but especially when that partner is a non-white male. This pattern makes perfect sense if one has even a passing familiarity with members of various ethnic groups and understands that most non-white men will not let white women get away with being stupid, crazy, and/or lazy bitches just because they are white. White men are the most forgiving toward white women's failures, while black men are the least forgiving. Asian men appear to be intermediate but closer to black men in their treatment of white women.

    The divorce rate of white male/Asian female couples in that survey is slightly higher than that of white male/white female couples, but, if that result is significant at all, I suspect that it is related to the average quality of the individuals who end up in such relationships (who tend toward the low end in my experience) rather than compatibility of those racial groups in general. Conversely, the success rate of white male/black female couples is probably so extremely high because lower quality members of those groups are less likely to start a relationship in the first place.

    Genius. You justified legal sexual slavery for white women.
    Have you considered, hare-lip, that you’re on the low-end of the IQ (Irrelevant Quotient) distribution and even lower on the sexual appeal spectrum for your own reasons? Go out and capture a woman, I know you’re thinking about it. Don’t actually submit to natural selection yourself. That’s for undesirables.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Diversity Heretic
    A major problem for people like McWhorter is that once you open up the topic of race-based differences, it may move beyond simple IQ differences, into genetically-based comportement differences, which may be much more important. Blacks are not only, on average, less intelligent than whites they also have less impulse control, a much shorter future-time orientation, a propensity for violence and much more promiscuous sexual behavior--all probably a result of evolving in a high disease load tropical environment. If blacks were simply less intelligent versions of whites, the problems woud be much more manageable, but their dysfunctional communities are also a product of dysfunctional behavior. This would justify two sets of laws and standards: one for whites and another for blacks. For example, it ought to be increasingly obvious to everyone that blacks simply should not have access to firearms. Their lack of impulse control and disregard of consequences exacerbate their genetic propensity to violence. Black disputes settled with fists or even knives would lead to much lower death and injury rates than what we have now. The notions that blacks can govern themselves in a democratic system devised by whites is also be open to challenge. Blacks elect representatives (e.g., Hank Johnson, who does not know that islands are anchored to the seabed and fears that they can tip over) whose stupidity is so manifest that the notion that he ought to be voting on laws to which whites will be subject would be laughable if if weren't so sad.

    Inasmuch as these largely fictive, more accurately ephemeral designations of the behaviors that inequality creates, actually happen (as opposed to exist), they are creditable to poverty and segregation and terrible peer support where the peers are unavailable or living under the fug of cognitive burden long-term poverty, exposure to violence and lead pipes – and their effects at and above the genetic level – inevitably cause. The behavior is not ‘always there’. It was not ‘always there.’

    and I’d be more circumspect about mocking black Congressmen when you vote for the party of Ben Sasse, Steve King, the Inhofe’s, Gohmert, Ron Paul, Ron Johnson, Papa Trump, Rick Perry, Sarah Palin on and on.

    Your biotruth hee-haw science is probably the result of white’s increasingly unable to cope in detail demanding environments. Everything you do has to be checked by a loud demagogue and verified by dead ancestors beneath a wall decorated with an unending array of bellicose, gaudy symbols.
    Violence would expose you to selection pressure in a disease-laden tropical environment, you fruit-cup perplexed racist innocent.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Look at the state of rural, semi-rural America, Britain, Europe from the Azores to Poland.

    That white curve is two standard deviations off in the wrong direction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Logan
    I'm half Swede and half German on dad's side, with English, Dutch, Scotch-Irish and some more German on my mother's side. But that side isn't traceable back far.

    OTOH, my BIL is 100% German, whatever that means given the history of how often Germany was fought across by invading armies.

    Modern Germany, like modern italy, is younger than the United States.

    People in the north of Germany look a lot different than Bavarians, many of which could pass for Southern Italian or Spanish, a few, even Portuguese.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Svigor

    McWhorter begins his article by asking what we have to gain by discussing the intellectual inferiority of blacks.
     
    There's a very simple answer to this: we can get the false charges against whites thrown out of court. The current argument is that whites must pay (in perpetuity) for "breaking" blacks. But blacks were already broken when whites found them. So whites are not responsible for black failure, Mother Nature is. (I note that the author makes this point, though I don't prefer the "off the hook" language)

    grew from implacably oppressive slavery followed by a Jim Crow hegemony that recapitulated slavery in essence. These were people living in what my linguist’s training reveals as a life bound in orality rather than literacy. To live restricted to casual speech rather than the artifice of writing creates a psychology ill equipped to score highly on the distinctly modern stunt known as the IQ test.
     
    50 years after Segregation's end, blacks still live in "orality." 99% still believe the false Roots narrative, wherein whites captured blacks in Africa and enslaved them. No, blacks captured blacks, enslaved them, and sold them to whites.

    If it’s “implacably oppressive” slavery you want, then look no further than black-on-black slavery in Africa or, better yet, Muslim-on-black slavery. According to M. A. Khan in Islamic Jihad, Muslims herded over 2 million black slaves out of Africa in the 19th century alone – a far cry from the 400,000 black slaves brought to North America along the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade in a span of over 400 years. Ronald Segal, in Islam’s Black Slaves, states that Islamic slave traders possibly enslaved around eleven million blacks in total, with estimates going as high as thirty million. And in many cases theirs was a truly wretched existence, with the women toiling as sex slaves and with the men being worked to death as conscript soldiers or galley slaves. In just about all cases, male black slaves captured by Islamic slave traders endured castration, a practice almost unheard of in the white, Christian outpost of the United States. Remember, eighty-to-ninety percent of black slaves perished before even making it to the Muslim world, again a far a cry from the sixteen percent of black slaves who died en route across the Atlantic (1.9 million out of 11.7 million according to my Mainstream of Civilization history textbook from 1989).
     
    A couple other relevant points:

    1 black slaves were captured and enslaved by other blacks via warfare; conquered blacks who wound up enslaved were the lucky ones; the rest were put to death.

    2 Roughly 11 million slaves are estimated to have come to the New World via the transatlantic trade; the 400,000 who didn't go to North America went to other parts of the Western Hemisphere, which were much more deadly to slaves than North America was. Millions of them were simply worked to death in the jungles of the Caribbean, Central America, and South America. Brazil was particularly nasty, and the trade there was almost entirely in the hands of the Jews (and crypto-Jews).

    I understand that blacks still did not have the same freedom and standard of living that whites had under the seventy-five-odd years of Jim Crow.
     
    They certainly lived beyond their means, though, thanks to whites - as they have since their arrival in this hemisphere.

    McWhorter tries to couch his disgust at this perspective in fatalism. Basically, he believes that white people are just too darn nice to accept such a “brutally open, race-based meritocratic consensus.” So since it is impossible to achieve, why talk about it?
     
    Whites will never reach such a conclusion, so we should ban whites from trying to persuade each other to reach such a conclusion. This is black literacy, I suppose.

    P.S., I would like to suggest that we encourage Jews to breed with blacks. Jews intermarriage rate with blacks is near zero and a dirty little Jewish secret. But I have hope that Jewish IQ can be used to raise black IQ to right around the white mean.

    Slash and Lisa Bonet were both products of such relationships.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • John McWhorter discussing his National Review piece with Glenn Loury on Bloggingheads.tv:

    https://bloggingheads.tv/videos/46919

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    Because Europeans who went to Africa died.

    Which also explains how some of the mulatto descendants of those first Europeans became the "middle men" in part of the slave trade for a few hundred years.

    Also why Portugal was the only European country with some success at establishing colonies and such in Africa prior to the 19th century. The Portuguese had a considerable strain of African blood from the Moops and from slaves introduced in the late medieval and early modern periods and assimilated into the population.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Logan
    Lived for a number of years in northern NM back in the 80s. Wife became good friends with quite a few of the local "Spanish" women. NOT Mexicans, as they would insist. Their ancestors had been living in the area since before the Mayflower.

    The ladies were indifferent about who their sons might marry, but without exception they wanted their daughters to marry Anglos, as they universally believed Anglo men treated their women better.

    FWIW

    Hey Logan,

    as they universally believed Anglo men treated their women better

    I don’t think there is much doubt that Anglos (and a lot of Western Europeans) put a high bar on the good treatment of women. That is a good and chivalrous thing. In some cultures domestic violence is endemic which is deplorable. Of course, some might say the Anglos have over compensated:

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey ueljang,

    White men are the most forgiving toward white women’s failures
     
    Possibly. I can tell you that plenty of White men on UNZ are constantly complaining about White women every time the subject comes up. I'm married to a wonderful white woman, but she is not indicative of the majority population. It seems White women may be (out of all the various groups) most likely to be influenced by feminism which just causes issues in general.

    The rest of your points seem like valid observations, again just speaking from what I've read about - which is honestly not a whole lot. It would be nice if, in the case of these divorces some questions were asked as to why they were happening; financial, spousal abuse, infidelity, etc.

    On the White male/Asian female thing, I asked my wife about this as she has a Masters in Family Therapy/Counseling. She said, that when they had read up on it, there was a trend in general that when people marry outside their group, they are doing it to escape the stereotypes of their own group but they likely marry into another group based on presuppositions that they have about that one.

    So for instance, the White male assumes he is marrying an Asian female who will be more submissive in character than a normal White female. But if the Asian woman is raised in the West, she might be marrying the White male in order to escape the pressure in her culture to be submissive. Thus this may lead to a result that is mixed up based upon the intentions of both parties.

    Peace.

    Lived for a number of years in northern NM back in the 80s. Wife became good friends with quite a few of the local “Spanish” women. NOT Mexicans, as they would insist. Their ancestors had been living in the area since before the Mayflower.

    The ladies were indifferent about who their sons might marry, but without exception they wanted their daughters to marry Anglos, as they universally believed Anglo men treated their women better.

    FWIW

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Logan,

    as they universally believed Anglo men treated their women better
     
    I don't think there is much doubt that Anglos (and a lot of Western Europeans) put a high bar on the good treatment of women. That is a good and chivalrous thing. In some cultures domestic violence is endemic which is deplorable. Of course, some might say the Anglos have over compensated:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tctvupaQe8A

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "That may very well be correct. The fact remains, however, that even when socio-economic and all other factors have been accounted-for, Blacks still commit violent crimes at a rate many times higher than Whites do. The statistics are clear and overwhelming."

    Absolutely no denying that fact. But, again, is that criminality based on genetics or environment?

    "If this were not the case, then the violent crime rates for White Appalachia, perhaps the poorest region of the U.S., would be comparable to those for poor Black areas. "

    Two different environments.

    The white Appalachian environment isn’t very different from that of poor rural blacks in the South. Or at least the physical environment isn’t very different. The cultural environment might be very different, though the family breakdown and drug use problems seem to be similar.

    Compare crime rates in those two areas and you’ve got something like apples to apples.

    According to this source, the overall crime rate in Appalachia is 2/3 the national average, and the violent crime rate is half the national average.

    http://theweek.com/articles/452321/appalachia-big-white-ghetto

    Don’t know what it is in the Black Belt, but I bet it’s a good bit higher.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @AndrewR
    Well it's both. Your brother in law likely shares more genes with the average German than with the average Greek.

    I’m half Swede and half German on dad’s side, with English, Dutch, Scotch-Irish and some more German on my mother’s side. But that side isn’t traceable back far.

    OTOH, my BIL is 100% German, whatever that means given the history of how often Germany was fought across by invading armies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Modern Germany, like modern italy, is younger than the United States.

    People in the north of Germany look a lot different than Bavarians, many of which could pass for Southern Italian or Spanish, a few, even Portuguese.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Dissident

    Poorer people regardless of race have an increased likelihood to engage in violence.
     
    That may very well be correct. The fact remains, however, that even when socio-economic and all other factors have been accounted-for, Blacks still commit violent crimes at a rate many times higher than Whites do. The statistics are clear and overwhelming. (And, if anything, there is reason to suspect that the actual rates of Black crime are even higher than those reflected in the statistics.
    https://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/
    http://www.vdare.com/users/nicholas-stix )

    If this were not the case, then the violent crime rates for White Appalachia, perhaps the poorest region of the U.S., would be comparable to those for poor Black areas. But they're not. Nowhere close.

    “That may very well be correct. The fact remains, however, that even when socio-economic and all other factors have been accounted-for, Blacks still commit violent crimes at a rate many times higher than Whites do. The statistics are clear and overwhelming.”

    Absolutely no denying that fact. But, again, is that criminality based on genetics or environment?

    “If this were not the case, then the violent crime rates for White Appalachia, perhaps the poorest region of the U.S., would be comparable to those for poor Black areas. ”

    Two different environments.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Logan
    The white Appalachian environment isn't very different from that of poor rural blacks in the South. Or at least the physical environment isn't very different. The cultural environment might be very different, though the family breakdown and drug use problems seem to be similar.

    Compare crime rates in those two areas and you've got something like apples to apples.

    According to this source, the overall crime rate in Appalachia is 2/3 the national average, and the violent crime rate is half the national average.

    http://theweek.com/articles/452321/appalachia-big-white-ghetto

    Don't know what it is in the Black Belt, but I bet it's a good bit higher.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Interesting story on IQ & parenting from my neck of the woods:

    http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2017/07/parents_with_intellectual_disa.html

    Is there a precedent for this?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @üeljang
    The determinative factor (or, shall I say, the "weakest link") appears to be white females. They cause higher rates of divorce regardless of the partner, but especially when that partner is a non-white male. This pattern makes perfect sense if one has even a passing familiarity with members of various ethnic groups and understands that most non-white men will not let white women get away with being stupid, crazy, and/or lazy bitches just because they are white. White men are the most forgiving toward white women's failures, while black men are the least forgiving. Asian men appear to be intermediate but closer to black men in their treatment of white women.

    The divorce rate of white male/Asian female couples in that survey is slightly higher than that of white male/white female couples, but, if that result is significant at all, I suspect that it is related to the average quality of the individuals who end up in such relationships (who tend toward the low end in my experience) rather than compatibility of those racial groups in general. Conversely, the success rate of white male/black female couples is probably so extremely high because lower quality members of those groups are less likely to start a relationship in the first place.

    Hey ueljang,

    White men are the most forgiving toward white women’s failures

    Possibly. I can tell you that plenty of White men on UNZ are constantly complaining about White women every time the subject comes up. I’m married to a wonderful white woman, but she is not indicative of the majority population. It seems White women may be (out of all the various groups) most likely to be influenced by feminism which just causes issues in general.

    The rest of your points seem like valid observations, again just speaking from what I’ve read about – which is honestly not a whole lot. It would be nice if, in the case of these divorces some questions were asked as to why they were happening; financial, spousal abuse, infidelity, etc.

    On the White male/Asian female thing, I asked my wife about this as she has a Masters in Family Therapy/Counseling. She said, that when they had read up on it, there was a trend in general that when people marry outside their group, they are doing it to escape the stereotypes of their own group but they likely marry into another group based on presuppositions that they have about that one.

    So for instance, the White male assumes he is marrying an Asian female who will be more submissive in character than a normal White female. But if the Asian woman is raised in the West, she might be marrying the White male in order to escape the pressure in her culture to be submissive. Thus this may lead to a result that is mixed up based upon the intentions of both parties.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Agree: Logan
    • Replies: @Logan
    Lived for a number of years in northern NM back in the 80s. Wife became good friends with quite a few of the local "Spanish" women. NOT Mexicans, as they would insist. Their ancestors had been living in the area since before the Mayflower.

    The ladies were indifferent about who their sons might marry, but without exception they wanted their daughters to marry Anglos, as they universally believed Anglo men treated their women better.

    FWIW
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey Truth,

    Yeah - recently I came across this as well. A white husband/black wife are almost 45% less likely to divorce than white/white or any other racial combo with whites (even Asians).

    http://www.divorcesource.com/blog/interracial-marriage-and-divorce/

    That is a remarkably and significantly strong marriage combo. Good for them. Or are people going to talk about black wombs being colonized - perish the thought - heavens to mergatroid!

    Peace.

    Peace.

    The determinative factor (or, shall I say, the “weakest link”) appears to be white females. They cause higher rates of divorce regardless of the partner, but especially when that partner is a non-white male. This pattern makes perfect sense if one has even a passing familiarity with members of various ethnic groups and understands that most non-white men will not let white women get away with being stupid, crazy, and/or lazy bitches just because they are white. White men are the most forgiving toward white women’s failures, while black men are the least forgiving. Asian men appear to be intermediate but closer to black men in their treatment of white women.

    The divorce rate of white male/Asian female couples in that survey is slightly higher than that of white male/white female couples, but, if that result is significant at all, I suspect that it is related to the average quality of the individuals who end up in such relationships (who tend toward the low end in my experience) rather than compatibility of those racial groups in general. Conversely, the success rate of white male/black female couples is probably so extremely high because lower quality members of those groups are less likely to start a relationship in the first place.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey ueljang,

    White men are the most forgiving toward white women’s failures
     
    Possibly. I can tell you that plenty of White men on UNZ are constantly complaining about White women every time the subject comes up. I'm married to a wonderful white woman, but she is not indicative of the majority population. It seems White women may be (out of all the various groups) most likely to be influenced by feminism which just causes issues in general.

    The rest of your points seem like valid observations, again just speaking from what I've read about - which is honestly not a whole lot. It would be nice if, in the case of these divorces some questions were asked as to why they were happening; financial, spousal abuse, infidelity, etc.

    On the White male/Asian female thing, I asked my wife about this as she has a Masters in Family Therapy/Counseling. She said, that when they had read up on it, there was a trend in general that when people marry outside their group, they are doing it to escape the stereotypes of their own group but they likely marry into another group based on presuppositions that they have about that one.

    So for instance, the White male assumes he is marrying an Asian female who will be more submissive in character than a normal White female. But if the Asian woman is raised in the West, she might be marrying the White male in order to escape the pressure in her culture to be submissive. Thus this may lead to a result that is mixed up based upon the intentions of both parties.

    Peace.
    , @hoops
    Genius. You justified legal sexual slavery for white women.
    Have you considered, hare-lip, that you're on the low-end of the IQ (Irrelevant Quotient) distribution and even lower on the sexual appeal spectrum for your own reasons? Go out and capture a woman, I know you're thinking about it. Don't actually submit to natural selection yourself. That's for undesirables.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Hey epochehusserl,

    Can’t really argue with opinions – to each his own.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey Truth,

    Yeah - recently I came across this as well. A white husband/black wife are almost 45% less likely to divorce than white/white or any other racial combo with whites (even Asians).

    http://www.divorcesource.com/blog/interracial-marriage-and-divorce/

    That is a remarkably and significantly strong marriage combo. Good for them. Or are people going to talk about black wombs being colonized - perish the thought - heavens to mergatroid!

    Peace.

    Peace.

    I think race mixing is gross.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Epochehusserl
    Why is the life expectancy for whites going down then if everybody never lived better?

    Hey Epochehusserl,

    We’ve never lived better materially – there is no doubt about this. On my way to work I pass multiple houses in upper class neighborhoods that would have only been afforded by dukes or earls in the past. When you go to the store – you don’t simply buy “orange juice” or “milk” like I did as a kid, you stand there bewildered by the number of choices you have.

    What’s helping to kill us is our gluttony and inability to control our desires. It is not normal for so people to eat this much or be this lazy or walk through life without any purpose. Perhaps it is because we are so well off that human beings are malfunctioning – maybe we are not meant to be this well off.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey dcite,

    I agree here that the race is not as significant as the right formula that makes a marriage work between a husband and wife. I've know plenty of Blacks (at least in the Muslim community) and one of the things they have mentioned is that, in their community, it is hard to find a reliable man who is husband material. So a good reliable husband is a fairly good catch. Likewise, from what I keep hearing on these forums is that white men are pretty pissed off that too many white women are ungrateful mates.

    A grateful wife and a husband who feels appreciated is a pretty solid combo.

    Whatever happened a hundred, or 500 yrs ago, everyone today has never lived better or had more opportunities. I live a life of ease that many of the princes of Persia would envy; climate control, ice cream - pretty nice!

    Peace.

    Why is the life expectancy for whites going down then if everybody never lived better?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Epochehusserl,

    We've never lived better materially - there is no doubt about this. On my way to work I pass multiple houses in upper class neighborhoods that would have only been afforded by dukes or earls in the past. When you go to the store - you don't simply buy "orange juice" or "milk" like I did as a kid, you stand there bewildered by the number of choices you have.

    What's helping to kill us is our gluttony and inability to control our desires. It is not normal for so people to eat this much or be this lazy or walk through life without any purpose. Perhaps it is because we are so well off that human beings are malfunctioning - maybe we are not meant to be this well off.

    Peace.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "Blacks are not only, on average, less intelligent than whites they also have less impulse control, a much shorter future-time orientation"...

    Actually, whites have a much shorter future-time orientation on average.

    http://akarlin.com/2012/08/why-russia-needs-a-strong-hand

    "a propensity for violence..."

    Poorer people regardless of race have an increased likelihood to engage in violence.

    "and much more promiscuous sexual behavior..."

    No, not quite.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/dec/19/young-white-men-uk-most-hated-social-group-public-attitudes

    https://psmag.com/social-justice/and-the-prize-for-promiscuity-goes-to-generation-x

    "all probably a result of evolving in a high disease load tropical environment."

    Sources or retract.

    "For example, it ought to be increasingly obvious to everyone that blacks simply should not have access to firearms."

    How would you rectify your proposal to the Second Amendment?

    "Blacks elect representatives (e.g., Hank Johnson, who does not know that islands are anchored to the seabed and fears that they can tip over) whose stupidity is so manifest that the notion that he ought to be voting on laws to which whites will be subject would be laughable if if weren’t so sad."

    A number of white people elected Donald Trump, whose stupidity is legendary.

    Poorer people regardless of race have an increased likelihood to engage in violence.

    That may very well be correct. The fact remains, however, that even when socio-economic and all other factors have been accounted-for, Blacks still commit violent crimes at a rate many times higher than Whites do. The statistics are clear and overwhelming. (And, if anything, there is reason to suspect that the actual rates of Black crime are even higher than those reflected in the statistics.

    https://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/

    http://www.vdare.com/users/nicholas-stix )

    If this were not the case, then the violent crime rates for White Appalachia, perhaps the poorest region of the U.S., would be comparable to those for poor Black areas. But they’re not. Nowhere close.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "That may very well be correct. The fact remains, however, that even when socio-economic and all other factors have been accounted-for, Blacks still commit violent crimes at a rate many times higher than Whites do. The statistics are clear and overwhelming."

    Absolutely no denying that fact. But, again, is that criminality based on genetics or environment?

    "If this were not the case, then the violent crime rates for White Appalachia, perhaps the poorest region of the U.S., would be comparable to those for poor Black areas. "

    Two different environments.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    Here’s a dictum I have read now and again on the internet: “an organization that isn’t explicitly anti-Left will eventually be swallowed up by the Left.”

    But the 'left' changed so much.

    Looks like the classic left is gone for good, and the new left got swallowed by capitalist consumer decadence.

    And look at China. Maoism lost out to capitalism and nationalism.

    And Soviet Union gave way to what became eventually conservative Russia.

    We keep hearing that the 'left' won the culture war, but no classic leftist would consider 'gay marriage' and '50 gender' degeneracy as anything leftist.

    No, Jewish Supremacists won, and they use homomania as proxy of bogus 'progressivism'.

    In the 90s, Democrats went 'new democrat' and adopted much of Reagan-Thatcherism.
    And Hillary turned into jingo-globo-imperialist, far worse than Johnson-Nixon put together.
    'Leftists' made peace with ultra-militarists.

    We keep hearing that the ‘left’ won the culture war, but no classic leftist would consider ‘gay marriage’ and ’50 gender’ degeneracy as anything leftist.

    Quite true, I believe and a point that seems mostly forgotten (by those old enough to have ever known it)/ little-known today.

    It is Cultural Marxists who are behind such lunacy as “Transgenderism”[1] and what you aptly call “homomania”[2]. In the piece I linked, Paul Gottfried, in explaining the origin and history of the term Cultural Marxism, acknowledges that it is problematic but presents an argument in favor of its use nonetheless.

    At any rate, cultural termite, a term I picked-up several years back from a Taki Mag commentor, would certainly fit those who promote the kind of insidious, pernicious, utterly corrosive filth that we are talking about here.

    No, Jewish Supremacists won, and they use homomania as proxy of bogus ‘progressivism’.

    Cultural Marxists and “Progressives” may be disproportionately of Jewish heritage (and even Jewish /identity/) but such individuals (and organizations) are very far from practicing or representing Judaism. (So-called “Reform Judaism” or “Liberal Judaism” are not to be confused with Judaism.)

    Zionism should also not be confused with Judaism.

    ‘Leftists’ made peace with ultra-militarists.

    Many did but not all.

    NOTES:
    [1] “Transgenderism”= Denial of the immutability of sex*, an objective reality. (*”Gender” is a linguistic construct.) This insanity has reached the point of the sanctioning — and even mandating– of irreversible damage being done to confused, innocent, young children.

    [2] “Homomania” = Promotion of all of the following:

    – The manifest falsehoods that homosexuality is (a) equivalent to heterosexuality, and, (b) without exception, both innate as well as immutable. Both are doctrinal assertions that defy much objective, often overwhelming evidence.

    – Extensive, nearly total /conflation/ of /feelings/ with /behavior/.

    – Extensive, nearly total conflation of the specific act of anal penetration with male homosexual behavior, /per se/. (Graphic content)

    – Extensive whitewashing and downplaying– at the direct expense of public health– of the overwhelmingly negative anatomical, physiological, psychological, aesthetic and social realities of anal penetration, an act that spreads deadly disease at a rate far higher than any other sex act.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "Blacks are not only, on average, less intelligent than whites they also have less impulse control, a much shorter future-time orientation"...

    Actually, whites have a much shorter future-time orientation on average.

    http://akarlin.com/2012/08/why-russia-needs-a-strong-hand

    "a propensity for violence..."

    Poorer people regardless of race have an increased likelihood to engage in violence.

    "and much more promiscuous sexual behavior..."

    No, not quite.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/dec/19/young-white-men-uk-most-hated-social-group-public-attitudes

    https://psmag.com/social-justice/and-the-prize-for-promiscuity-goes-to-generation-x

    "all probably a result of evolving in a high disease load tropical environment."

    Sources or retract.

    "For example, it ought to be increasingly obvious to everyone that blacks simply should not have access to firearms."

    How would you rectify your proposal to the Second Amendment?

    "Blacks elect representatives (e.g., Hank Johnson, who does not know that islands are anchored to the seabed and fears that they can tip over) whose stupidity is so manifest that the notion that he ought to be voting on laws to which whites will be subject would be laughable if if weren’t so sad."

    A number of white people elected Donald Trump, whose stupidity is legendary.

    You may disagree with Trump, but you don’t survive in high end commercial real estate by being stupid.

    Most of our political leaders wouldn’t last a day in that world

    Read More
    • Agree: anarchyst
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    McWhorter also gives off a whiff of menace towards the end of his article. Another reason to avoid discussing race? Why, threat of violence, of course! Observe:

    As a topic whose discussion will yield injury, fury, and doubletalk with no countervailing benefits in terms of prescriptions for how society ought to operate, it ought be exempted from open discussion.

    McWorther says a very wise thing there. And I wonder why some pretend not to see it.

    “Truth” ‘s place is dense scientific tomes discussed by scholars among themselves, not for public knowledge and debate.
    This applies, and is being done presently, to many more topics than only IQ & Race.

    Take “love”.
    There is a definition of “love” for YouTube and Facebook (and the billions using them).
    Another one for other settings.
    One for sociobiology and psychology.
    And so on.

    Keeping a society together, every society even a group of 10 people, means not hurting/triggering envy pride, vanity, illusions and delusions, past a certain point.

    The mainstream accounts on intelligence (and other traits!) & race will have to be, well, tales tailored to the psychological needs of the public — as has always been and is, again, regarding a great number of questions.

    ************

    Do you hear, for example, of mainstream psychologists telling people what the real reasons for their “giving charity”, and drives under the institution of “charity organizations”/NGOs are?

    That it is all a way of rewarding their own ego for the small contributors, and for the leaders one to acquire power and renown?
    Say truth about any social reality, and you will see the object of your truth-saying crumble apart in an instant.

    Truth is society’s nemesis.

    Why should it be different as to cognitive ability, of all things?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey dcite,

    I agree here that the race is not as significant as the right formula that makes a marriage work between a husband and wife. I've know plenty of Blacks (at least in the Muslim community) and one of the things they have mentioned is that, in their community, it is hard to find a reliable man who is husband material. So a good reliable husband is a fairly good catch. Likewise, from what I keep hearing on these forums is that white men are pretty pissed off that too many white women are ungrateful mates.

    A grateful wife and a husband who feels appreciated is a pretty solid combo.

    Whatever happened a hundred, or 500 yrs ago, everyone today has never lived better or had more opportunities. I live a life of ease that many of the princes of Persia would envy; climate control, ice cream - pretty nice!

    Peace.

    Whatever happened a hundred, or 500 yrs ago, everyone today has never lived better or had more opportunities

    Very true.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    We were playing kickball and relay racing in 4th grade.

    You kicked white balls and won all the races.

    LOL;

    Dude, for your own health and mental sanity, PLEASE find a hobby.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Soros-Sponsored Immigration Network Exposed In Italy:”

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-16/soros-sponsored-immigration-network-exposed-italy

    “Why is there a migrant crisis in the Mediterranean? Why are NGOs involved? Because there is an extensive network of open borders activists and organizations behind it; many of them are directly funded by or cooperated with George Soros’ Open Society. Is it illegal? Not really. Political activism is an essential part of democratic societies. However, sometimes it goes too far, or the promoted causes prove to be either unrealistic or unsustainable.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @dcite
    WM/BF are not going to marry unless they genuinely like each other, not just lust or "love." The percentage is small, odd, and people leave them to be. Also, women are always happier marrying up, and men always happier when they are the "up." Society in general is more comfortable with that arrangement. We live in a civilization created by whites (in every sense, good and bad), not by blacks. Cheap cotton may have enabled quicker development, but the United States was mainly a product of Yankee ingenuity. Everything blacks desire, however proud they may be of their color, they owe to modern civilization. Currently, the bf/wm combo is not a fetish or especially promoted in the way the wf/bm is. During slavery days, it was. The bm/wf is promoted to a creepy degree, by irresponsible people. Black women hate it, naturally. Most white women are not into it and wish to be left alone. White men are forced to pretend to go along. Even black men more often prefer their own race unless the wf act like, well, women of no virtue or self-awareness. Or awareness at all.

    Whatever happened a hundred, or 500 yrs ago, blacks today have never lived better or had more opportunities. You want to get someone to hate you bitterly, live in denial? Do them a favor. Best way to make enemies.

    Hey dcite,

    I agree here that the race is not as significant as the right formula that makes a marriage work between a husband and wife. I’ve know plenty of Blacks (at least in the Muslim community) and one of the things they have mentioned is that, in their community, it is hard to find a reliable man who is husband material. So a good reliable husband is a fairly good catch. Likewise, from what I keep hearing on these forums is that white men are pretty pissed off that too many white women are ungrateful mates.

    A grateful wife and a husband who feels appreciated is a pretty solid combo.

    Whatever happened a hundred, or 500 yrs ago, everyone today has never lived better or had more opportunities. I live a life of ease that many of the princes of Persia would envy; climate control, ice cream – pretty nice!

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dcite

    Whatever happened a hundred, or 500 yrs ago, everyone today has never lived better or had more opportunities
     
    Very true.
    , @Epochehusserl
    Why is the life expectancy for whites going down then if everybody never lived better?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Truth

    There was a game that white kids and black kids used to play together in 4th grade called ‘suck my dic*’. Kids would compete to see who could assemble the wooden puzzle faster, and the loser would have to ‘suck’ the winner’s thing.
     
    We were playing kickball and relay racing in 4th grade.

    We were playing kickball and relay racing in 4th grade.

    You kicked white balls and won all the races.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    LOL;

    Dude, for your own health and mental sanity, PLEASE find a hobby.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • What racial lunacy in Mizzou did.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Shut up about race, McWhorter tells us, or you will be injured. Is this really the message National Review wishes to give its readers?

    What’s wrong with you?…..YES!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Logan
    Fair enough. Thanks for playing.

    However, you have defined "whiteness" not as a race, but as a characteristic. Which means I'm less white than my BIL, who looks like an SS recruiting poster.

    Well it’s both. Your brother in law likely shares more genes with the average German than with the average Greek.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Logan
    I'm half Swede and half German on dad's side, with English, Dutch, Scotch-Irish and some more German on my mother's side. But that side isn't traceable back far.

    OTOH, my BIL is 100% German, whatever that means given the history of how often Germany was fought across by invading armies.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey Truth,

    Yeah - recently I came across this as well. A white husband/black wife are almost 45% less likely to divorce than white/white or any other racial combo with whites (even Asians).

    http://www.divorcesource.com/blog/interracial-marriage-and-divorce/

    That is a remarkably and significantly strong marriage combo. Good for them. Or are people going to talk about black wombs being colonized - perish the thought - heavens to mergatroid!

    Peace.

    Peace.

    WM/BF are not going to marry unless they genuinely like each other, not just lust or “love.” The percentage is small, odd, and people leave them to be. Also, women are always happier marrying up, and men always happier when they are the “up.” Society in general is more comfortable with that arrangement. We live in a civilization created by whites (in every sense, good and bad), not by blacks. Cheap cotton may have enabled quicker development, but the United States was mainly a product of Yankee ingenuity. Everything blacks desire, however proud they may be of their color, they owe to modern civilization. Currently, the bf/wm combo is not a fetish or especially promoted in the way the wf/bm is. During slavery days, it was. The bm/wf is promoted to a creepy degree, by irresponsible people. Black women hate it, naturally. Most white women are not into it and wish to be left alone. White men are forced to pretend to go along. Even black men more often prefer their own race unless the wf act like, well, women of no virtue or self-awareness. Or awareness at all.

    Whatever happened a hundred, or 500 yrs ago, blacks today have never lived better or had more opportunities. You want to get someone to hate you bitterly, live in denial? Do them a favor. Best way to make enemies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey dcite,

    I agree here that the race is not as significant as the right formula that makes a marriage work between a husband and wife. I've know plenty of Blacks (at least in the Muslim community) and one of the things they have mentioned is that, in their community, it is hard to find a reliable man who is husband material. So a good reliable husband is a fairly good catch. Likewise, from what I keep hearing on these forums is that white men are pretty pissed off that too many white women are ungrateful mates.

    A grateful wife and a husband who feels appreciated is a pretty solid combo.

    Whatever happened a hundred, or 500 yrs ago, everyone today has never lived better or had more opportunities. I live a life of ease that many of the princes of Persia would envy; climate control, ice cream - pretty nice!

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Truth

    Wm/bf are more near the average rate of success,
     
    In every survey I've seen these are the happiest most successful marriages.

    Hey Truth,

    Yeah – recently I came across this as well. A white husband/black wife are almost 45% less likely to divorce than white/white or any other racial combo with whites (even Asians).

    http://www.divorcesource.com/blog/interracial-marriage-and-divorce/

    That is a remarkably and significantly strong marriage combo. Good for them. Or are people going to talk about black wombs being colonized – perish the thought – heavens to mergatroid!

    Peace.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Agree: Truth
    • Replies: @dcite
    WM/BF are not going to marry unless they genuinely like each other, not just lust or "love." The percentage is small, odd, and people leave them to be. Also, women are always happier marrying up, and men always happier when they are the "up." Society in general is more comfortable with that arrangement. We live in a civilization created by whites (in every sense, good and bad), not by blacks. Cheap cotton may have enabled quicker development, but the United States was mainly a product of Yankee ingenuity. Everything blacks desire, however proud they may be of their color, they owe to modern civilization. Currently, the bf/wm combo is not a fetish or especially promoted in the way the wf/bm is. During slavery days, it was. The bm/wf is promoted to a creepy degree, by irresponsible people. Black women hate it, naturally. Most white women are not into it and wish to be left alone. White men are forced to pretend to go along. Even black men more often prefer their own race unless the wf act like, well, women of no virtue or self-awareness. Or awareness at all.

    Whatever happened a hundred, or 500 yrs ago, blacks today have never lived better or had more opportunities. You want to get someone to hate you bitterly, live in denial? Do them a favor. Best way to make enemies.
    , @epochehusserl
    I think race mixing is gross.
    , @üeljang
    The determinative factor (or, shall I say, the "weakest link") appears to be white females. They cause higher rates of divorce regardless of the partner, but especially when that partner is a non-white male. This pattern makes perfect sense if one has even a passing familiarity with members of various ethnic groups and understands that most non-white men will not let white women get away with being stupid, crazy, and/or lazy bitches just because they are white. White men are the most forgiving toward white women's failures, while black men are the least forgiving. Asian men appear to be intermediate but closer to black men in their treatment of white women.

    The divorce rate of white male/Asian female couples in that survey is slightly higher than that of white male/white female couples, but, if that result is significant at all, I suspect that it is related to the average quality of the individuals who end up in such relationships (who tend toward the low end in my experience) rather than compatibility of those racial groups in general. Conversely, the success rate of white male/black female couples is probably so extremely high because lower quality members of those groups are less likely to start a relationship in the first place.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "No, I caught it."

    Only when it was pointed out to you. You completely missed it.

    "And you are a cuck."

    That's all you have in your verbal assault arsenal. Really pathetic.

    No, it was immediately clear, it wasn’t even remotely subtle, as you claimed.

    And you really are a cuck.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Numinous

    Not buying this given the types of ships that existed during the slave trade days. No more than a couple of hundred on a trip.
     
    Slaves were not guests in cabins. They were packed like sardines in the holds. Use your imagination.

    {Slaves were not guests in cabins. They were packed like sardines in the holds. Use your imagination.}

    {No more than a couple of hundred on a trip.}

    Mayflower had 100 passengers and 30 crew.
    There would hardly be any ‘guest cabins’ on small ships of the time.
    Mayflower was about 100-feet long.

    And whether the slaves were packed like sardine or not, they had to able to move: to eat, to drink, to relieve themselves.

    So a ‘cargo’ of 200 slaves seems about right, given that regular passenger load was ~100.
    There is only so much room on a 100-foot ship.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    No, I caught it. And you are a cuck.

    “No, I caught it.”

    Only when it was pointed out to you. You completely missed it.

    “And you are a cuck.”

    That’s all you have in your verbal assault arsenal. Really pathetic.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    No, it was immediately clear, it wasn't even remotely subtle, as you claimed.

    And you really are a cuck.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @dcite
    A lot of people here don't get out much, although your reference to the young and social media porn, is good information. I know white women who have dated, or even lived with/married, blacks. They are not fixated, as a rule. I don't know why, as I don't ask too many questions, but they mostly find out it just doesn't work. There is far more to life than sex, and I even wonder how that can really be compatible in races so different in their mentality, for so much of sex happens in the mind and heart. Even physically I recall the aversion to it when discussed in high school by more or less free spirited persons. You can get used to almost anything though. The success rate for bm/wf partners is very low, and has a very high incidence of violence. Wm/bf are more near the average rate of success, but even there the male half is in more danger than if he were with a white or Asian. There are successful bw marriages, but not many. Most of the sex is among young people who don't know what the hell they're doing, and just hope they use birth control, because they ALWAYS regret the results if they don't.
    btw, Caucasoid populations in Asia and parts of Africa have lived in close proximity for centuries, and envy on the part of the whites (as they call themselves) is not characteristic. More often, aspiration to more Caucasoid features is desired by both races.

    Wm/bf are more near the average rate of success,

    In every survey I’ve seen these are the happiest most successful marriages.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Truth,

    Yeah - recently I came across this as well. A white husband/black wife are almost 45% less likely to divorce than white/white or any other racial combo with whites (even Asians).

    http://www.divorcesource.com/blog/interracial-marriage-and-divorce/

    That is a remarkably and significantly strong marriage combo. Good for them. Or are people going to talk about black wombs being colonized - perish the thought - heavens to mergatroid!

    Peace.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Black-White Relations in a nutshell.

    White boys get Knocked Out & White Girls get Knocked Up by Blacks.

    KO-KU or KoKu is future of the West.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @MarkinLA
    Roughly 11 million slaves are estimated to have come to the New World via the transatlantic trade;

    Not buying this given the types of ships that existed during the slave trade days. No more than a couple of hundred on a trip. Most would have had to be born here from slave parents. Where di this number come from?

    Not buying this given the types of ships that existed during the slave trade days. No more than a couple of hundred on a trip.

    Slaves were not guests in cabins. They were packed like sardines in the holds. Use your imagination.

    Read More
    • Agree: Talha
    • Replies: @Avery
    {Slaves were not guests in cabins. They were packed like sardines in the holds. Use your imagination.}

    {No more than a couple of hundred on a trip.}

    Mayflower had 100 passengers and 30 crew.
    There would hardly be any 'guest cabins' on small ships of the time.
    Mayflower was about 100-feet long.

    And whether the slaves were packed like sardine or not, they had to able to move: to eat, to drink, to relieve themselves.

    So a 'cargo' of 200 slaves seems about right, given that regular passenger load was ~100.
    There is only so much room on a 100-foot ship.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anarchyst
    you sir, are incorrect. You are parroting what you learned in elementary school. Read the writings on the subject and you will come to the correct conclusion...

    You may notice that when I disagreed with your comment, I did you the honor of taking your argument seriously and provided a detailed explanation of why I disagreed.

    You, OTOH, responded with the witheringly effective argument of, “You’re wrong.”

    Then you appear to suggest that I should do my own research in order to prove you right.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • black slaves were offered their freedom if they would only rise up against their masters. They in large part refused.

    Most likely because they weren’t sure if the North would succeed in winning the war, and not because the slaves and masters had “affectionate” relations. If the South won, there would be reprisals against the rebel slaves to match what the Romans did to Spartacus and his followers. This is “duh” on a gigantic scale.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @AndrewR
    Whiteness is on a spectrum. Swedes are whiter than Greeks. Greeks are whiter than Persians. Persians are whiter than Indians. North Indians are whiter than Dravidians, many of whom are completely non-white.

    Jews are a special case. They must always be considered non-white. A failure to do so allows them to subvert and dominate any white society.

    Fair enough. Thanks for playing.

    However, you have defined “whiteness” not as a race, but as a characteristic. Which means I’m less white than my BIL, who looks like an SS recruiting poster.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Well it's both. Your brother in law likely shares more genes with the average German than with the average Greek.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous White Male
    "Japanese now feel morally defensive about their homogeneity. They don’t feel proud of it and apologize when pressed about it. In the past, Japanese were proud about their homogeneity and wrote books about how Japanese are a unique people. Now, such ideas are absent, and Japanese media push interracism and diversity."

    "And Japanese women have lost respect in Japanese men who now act and talk like pansies and dorks. And easy travel makes it possible for Japanese women to seeking Negro men. And as it’s no longer frowned upon by Japanese society, it will spread and spread. Also, Japanese women are raised to be whores. Their fathers are TV-addicted morons and their mothers are whores themselves into adultery and stuff."

    "As individuals, Japanese are vulnerable. Japanese men are small and can be whupped by any man. Also, they are timid and lack personality. IN the past, Japanese men and women were part of a cultural ecology, and they married according to collective rules and customs. But as they’ve broken down, atomized Japanese men withdraw into video game land, and Japanese women seek out better men or watch TV soap for fantasy."

    Perhaps you can show us the data that makes this reality and not just the personal opinions of a black willy obsessed troll that got his butt kicked by blacks in school, apparently engaged with blacks in fellatio, and comes to this site to spread gossip, half-truths, distortions and irrational personal opinions. Say, Prissy, have you ever lived in Japan?

    He’s talking out of his hat. Mostly made up.

    AGAIN. ca.98% of Japan is racially ethnically Japanese. As in BOTH sides of one’s family are racially Japanese. Aside from the few US military who are stationed there, its extremely rare for ordinary Japanese to come into daily contact with blacks. Japanese isn’t an easy language for whites to learn, much less for blacks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "Ok, then get in line for reparations. Lord knows you and your kind deserve it for having ancestor(s) who were once enslaved. Go ahead. Apply for reparations for hundreds of yrs of slavery since the price paid to blacks hasn’t been paid in full as of 2017. Go ahead."

    Dude, I'm a white American man who is married with children. Besides, had you been paying closer attention, prominent black people have responded that slave reparation money would be foolishly spent.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W234NiTkBO4

    That’s not the same as saying that they unanimously are vs. receiving reparations. They missed getting it under Obama, but give it time, another administration will surely bring it up.

    Do show where they unanimously (via their appointed leaders) said, “Know what? We don’t want any free money thru reparations. Whitey, ya’ll can keep your money. We’re fine.” I mean, free give aways works for families of Michael Brown and others. Why not for the whole community in one fell swoop?

    Someone needs to inform Ta-Nehesi Coates that his community doesn’t want reparations, he seems to think its a legitimate issue to push.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @nok
    The writer of this article is not only ignorant of African history, he is also a racist... Every thing he know about Africa is after the invasion of Africa by slave raiders who later became colonial masters. to which after their invasion of Africa, they deliberately destroyed,twisted and obliterate some parts of our history, destroyed our heritage, contaminated our value system and stole some of our artifacts which are littered in various museums round the world.

    He should do more research in to African history, culture and heritage..

    The Benin empire was one of the most sophisticated empires in Africa before it fell to the white invaders

    The fulani have had contacts with the Arabs long before the British conquest and they were literate in Arabic studies.


    The igbos of Nigeria had a well developed writing system know as the Nsibidi which they shared with the Effiks and ibibios. They also had a well developed and flourishing metallurgical industry before it was destroyed and stolen by the in coming slave raiders. The Igbo-Ukwu bronzes amazed the world with a very high level of technical and artistic proficiency and sophistication which was at this time distinctly more advanced than bronze casting in Europe.[2] Peter Garlake compares the Igbo-Ukwu bronzes "to the finest jewelry of rococo Europe or of Carl Faberge,"[3] and William Buller Fagg states they were created with "a strange rococo almost Faberge type virtuosity."[4] Frank Willett says that the Igbo-Ukwu bronzes portray a standard that is comparable to that established by Benvenuto Cellini five hundred years later in Europe.[5] Denis Williams calls them "an exquisite explosion without antecedent or issue."[6] One of the objects found, a water pot set in a mesh of simulated rope is described by Hugh Honour and John Fleming as

    A virtuoso feat of cire perdue (lost wax) casting. Its elegant design and refined detailing are matched by a level of technical accomplishment that is notably more advanced than European bronze casting of this period.[2]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeology_of_Igbo-Ukwu

    The Benin empire was one of the most sophisticated empires in Africa

    I know. I’ve created one of those in my backyard a few weeks ago.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Logan
    Sorry, but you are yourself misrepresenting both situations.

    Sure, Lincoln's Proclamation applied only the areas in rebellion. He had no authority to emancipate slaves except as a military action taken to suppress rebellion. He did, however, work consistently to emancipate slaves in Union states by state action. By his death, the only slaves remaining anywhere in the country were a couple hundred in DE and around 50,000 in KY.

    Re: the 3/5 bit. At the time of the Convention, it was widely assumed that states would be assessed by Congress as a tax, with it left up to the states how to raise those taxes. The contributions would be assessed based on population.

    Northern states wanted taxes assessed with slaves counted at full value, and with representation allocated with slaves not counted at all.

    Southern states wanted the opposite: slaves counted fully for representation and not at all for taxation.

    The compromise was at 3/5 for both. But it had nothing at all to do with whether slaves were considered people. Even southern legal systems never pretended otherwise. Slaves were always referred to as persons. Crimes committed against them could be prosecuted. At least two white men were hanged for murder of slaves.

    you sir, are incorrect. You are parroting what you learned in elementary school. Read the writings on the subject and you will come to the correct conclusion…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Logan
    You may notice that when I disagreed with your comment, I did you the honor of taking your argument seriously and provided a detailed explanation of why I disagreed.

    You, OTOH, responded with the witheringly effective argument of, "You're wrong."

    Then you appear to suggest that I should do my own research in order to prove you right.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • It turns out that those whites of the 1950’s (myself included) that protested against forced integration were right, all along…
    Blacks were doing much better when they had their own institutions, businesses, social organizations, residential areas, etc.
    It was communists and other society destroyers (the “chosen” and other northern-based “carpetbaggers”) who are directly responsible for our present racial and social ills.
    I grew up during the first “civil-rights” era and have a decidedly different “take” on this whole “civil-rights movement” era. In fact, I saw for myself, what went on during those turbulent times.
    Despite the lies and fabrications by the so-called “mainstream media” the “civil-rights marches” in the South were not peaceful “gatherings” that were met with dogs and fire hoses, but were violent black confrontations that actually set back the “cause” of TRUE “civil-rights”. .
    The so-called “civil-rights” demonstrations were waves of lawlessness that disrupted the lives of peaceful citizens. There were many black citizens in these areas that were against these “outsiders” coming there to cause trouble. These “civil-rights” marchers committed crimes, rapes, robberies and other crimes, and trashed the areas they were protesting in. I WAS THERE . . . Of course, the cameras were turned off during the episodes of violence. . .then just as now, the news media could not “let a crisis go to waste” . . .
    It was mostly ACLU, $PLC and ADL types that riled things up. . .and then later on “melted into the woodwork” only to become “civil-rights” attorneys, race hustlers and poverty pimps.
    One incident comes to mind–the death of Mrs. Viola Liuzzo–Mrs. Liuzzo was a Detroit housewife who traveled to the “deep south” (without her husband) to run around with “freedom riders” at night–this was a recipe that was asking for trouble. What business did she have running around with blacks at night in the South while she had a family in Detroit?? Why did she put herself “in harms way”??
    I WAS THERE during the “civil-rights” disturbances and witnessed the misbehavior of these “civil-rights” groups (that never got reported). . .
    Of course, the “victors” write the history. To the victors–how does it feel now that those you pushed and supported are now turning on you??
    The so-called “news media” had an agenda then as it does now. White-on black crime (although relatively rare) is ALWAYS described as a “hate crime” where as black-on-white crime is NEVER described as a “hate crime”. . .Actually, ALL crimes are “hate crimes” . . .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • …the 1957 and 1964 “civil-rights” acts revoked our right to “freedom of association” (only for whites) and replaced it with government-backed, and forced “public accommodation”. Try selling your house only to someone of your own race. Try renting an apartment or house only to someone of your own race…you will be shut down, if there is even an inkling of “discrimination” against a “protected” minority…
    This unconstitutional behavior by government has gotten worse, with moslems, homosexuals, and soon, pedophiles becoming a part of the “protected” classes…since “civil-rights” laws DO NOT APPLY to white males. Our esteemed “attorney general” Loretta Lynch and the head of the so-called Justice Department’s (actually “just us”) “civil-rights” division has stated as such…
    Us white males have become third-class citizens in our own country. It would seem, that since whites are only 6% of the world’s population, we would be a part of the MOST protected class on the planet. Of course, that will never happen. Voluntary segregation is the only answer.
    The solution to the “real estate” problem is for a large landowner to offer parcels of land in a “trust” arrangement. This keeps the government out of the decision of WHO may purchase and enjoy the land. This is but one way to keep “undesirables” out without running afoul of the misguided “fair housing” laws…
    Us whites will have to come up with solutions on our own OUTSIDE of government control or intervention…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I grew up in Detroit, and personally witnessed the destruction of a once-great city. There are a number of reasons for Detroit’s decline that have never been explored or discussed.
    1. “Blockbusting” by greedy real estate agents. Real estate agents would send out postcards with the following: “A new family is moving into your neighborhood. If you want to sell your house, please call me at xxx-xxxx”. A “new family” was a euphemism for black families, and was used to “encourage” whites to sell their homes.
    2. HUD (Housing and Urban Development) speculators and real estate hustlers conspired to buy up” and raze the best houses on every block, in certain sections of the city. Quite often, “shacks” were left standing while decent housing was purchased by HUD and razed. This was done purposely to depress property values, to make it easier for speculators to purchase properties at “bargain basement” prices.
    I realize that items 1 and 2 counteract each other and are at cross purposes, but they were a reality in 1960s Detroit.
    3. The 1967 riots did much to push whites out of Detroit. A little-known aspect of the Detroit riots was the application of spray-painted words on the exteriors of black-owned businesses. The words “soul brother” was spray-painted on businesses owned by blacks so that the “angels of death” (actually rioters) would spare them from destruction. Whole business districts around the city were destroyed, never to regain their former selves.
    4. The election of Coleman Alexander Young, Detroit’s first black mayor, who was overtly racist to Detroit’s white citizens while “getting along just fine” with the “movers and shakers” (big business people) of the day (as long as the campaign donations kept coming in)….
    5. The abolition of the STRESS (Stop The Robberies, Enjoy Safe Streets). This anti-criminal program was put in by mayor Young’s predecessor and was quite successful in “cleaning up the streets” of criminals. In this program, police officers would disguise themselves as vulnerable old people and walk through neighborhoods as “decoys”. Predatory criminals would attempt to rob these elderly citizens and quite often, were dispatched to “the great hereafter”. One of Young’s campaign promises was the abolition of the STRESS program as too many of “his people” were being eliminated. Upon the election of Young, the program was disbanded.
    These are 5 reasons for this once-great city’s demise.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    Yeah, all five of them. Japan remains ca.98% racially Asian (fully Japanese).

    I didn't say Japan as of NOW is filled with Negroes.

    I said it may happen in the future.

    Why?

    Because even though there are few blacks in Japan now, Negropholia is a cancer in Japan, and cancer spreads. No matter how small it begins, it spread and spreads and never stops spreading.

    Even in the past, there were some blacks in Japan, mostly due to US military presence and rappers/jazz artists. But back then, Japan regarded them as a mere presence, not some ideal to promote. Things are different now.

    1. Japanese no longer have the kind of pride they did. Most Japanese grew up as only-child. This happened over three generations, and this means many Japanese have no uncles, aunts, cousins, nieces, nephews. The kind of Japanese family culture seen in Ozu films are gone.
    Instead, Japanese kids grew up as single kids identifying with comic books, video games, professional fighters, and etc. So, Japanese grew up as loners, not as members of family instilled with Japanese culture and identity.

    2. Japanese have become more accepting of foreign domination. The most sacred sport of Japan is sumo, but Japanese allowed Mongols to totally take over and break all records. Now, Mongols are East Asians and similar to Japanese, but this should be humiliating, but Japan just accepted it like a bitch. Mongols failed to invade Japan but now they did. But what is interesting is how Japanese didn't take measures to stop importation of Mongols. MORE were brought to whup Japanese even more. It wont' be long before Negroes enter and totally whup all Japanese and hump the ho's.

    3. Anime, manga, video games, and J-pop made Japanese favor fantasy over reality. Also, these are all trans-racial and Japanese are mentally wanna-be-whites. But there is growing rap culture, and Japanese are into black culture. Many Japanese girls try to be gangsta and grow up listening rap. This means many young Japanese feel more globo-Afro than Japanese.

    4. There is a whole subculture where Japanese women seek out black men. A military guy who spent a lot of time in Yokohama told me that many Japanese women are into jungaru fever. And Japanese men are a bunch of cucks. He told me cuck culture is there in Japan too. Japanese men have white men and black men hump their ho's, and cuck pornography is a big thing in Japan. Jus think about it. Japan has few blacks, but their culture is already like this.

    5. Already, children of Japanese women who went with blacks are making big splash in media and sports. Some mulatto was Ms. Japan, and mulatto Japanese win Olympic medals. This makes Japanese see mulatto-ism as a good thing since it wins blings for Japan. Never mind that these mulattoes are products of Japanese women rejecting Japanese men as inferior.

    In the past, there were some mulattoes in Japan, but Japanese treated them like other minorities. Nuisance that had to be tolerated. But now, Japanese are promoting such people as the new ideal.
    Also, as US dominates global discourse, mistreatment of blacks is a far bigger issue than, say, mistreating other minorities. So, Japanese have imbibed 'white guilt' and try to prove that it is a 'good nation' by being pro-black. This will remove stigma from race-mixing, and more Japanese women will go black and have mulatto babies. Blacks, like Jews and homos, must get special consideration since they are protected by globalism as special people. If Japanese mistreat Iranian minorities, who cares? But if some Negro cries 'racism' in Japan, it's in the NY Times.

    6. Japanese men have already lost sexual confidence. By some news accts, 50% of Japanese men have given up on sex and marriage and look forward to buying sex robots. And 80% of Japanese women say they are sexually unsatisfied. Now, combine those factors with globalism, Liberal Japanese media's promotion of diversity-blacks-interracism, and you now have a mechanism in place to expand more interracism with blacks.

    7. Japanese now feel morally defensive about their homogeneity. They don't feel proud of it and apologize when pressed about it. In the past, Japanese were proud about their homogeneity and wrote books about how Japanese are a unique people. Now, such ideas are absent, and Japanese media push interracism and diversity.

    So, when we take into account all these factors, the problem of interracism isn't just a wound. It is now a cancer, and it will accelerate.

    We are told that Shinzo Abe is right-wing and ultra-nationalist, but it's of no use. As Japan is whore nation of the US, it can't do much with its so-called nationalism. What matters is what happens among the people, and they are cucked, infantilized(with kawaii culture), atomized and isolated, and globalized.

    And Japanese women have lost respect in Japanese men who now act and talk like pansies and dorks. And easy travel makes it possible for Japanese women to seeking Negro men. And as it's no longer frowned upon by Japanese society, it will spread and spread. Also, Japanese women are raised to be whores. Their fathers are TV-addicted morons and their mothers are whores themselves into adultery and stuff.

    Japanese power was always collective and traditional. It's a delicate ecology. As individuals, Japanese are vulnerable. Japanese men are small and can be whupped by any man. Also, they are timid and lack personality. IN the past, Japanese men and women were part of a cultural ecology, and they married according to collective rules and customs. But as they've broken down, atomized Japanese men withdraw into video game land, and Japanese women seek out better men or watch TV soap for fantasy.

    It is a cancer.

    “Japanese now feel morally defensive about their homogeneity. They don’t feel proud of it and apologize when pressed about it. In the past, Japanese were proud about their homogeneity and wrote books about how Japanese are a unique people. Now, such ideas are absent, and Japanese media push interracism and diversity.”

    “And Japanese women have lost respect in Japanese men who now act and talk like pansies and dorks. And easy travel makes it possible for Japanese women to seeking Negro men. And as it’s no longer frowned upon by Japanese society, it will spread and spread. Also, Japanese women are raised to be whores. Their fathers are TV-addicted morons and their mothers are whores themselves into adultery and stuff.”

    “As individuals, Japanese are vulnerable. Japanese men are small and can be whupped by any man. Also, they are timid and lack personality. IN the past, Japanese men and women were part of a cultural ecology, and they married according to collective rules and customs. But as they’ve broken down, atomized Japanese men withdraw into video game land, and Japanese women seek out better men or watch TV soap for fantasy.”

    Perhaps you can show us the data that makes this reality and not just the personal opinions of a black willy obsessed troll that got his butt kicked by blacks in school, apparently engaged with blacks in fellatio, and comes to this site to spread gossip, half-truths, distortions and irrational personal opinions. Say, Prissy, have you ever lived in Japan?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yojimbo/Zatoichi
    He's talking out of his hat. Mostly made up.

    AGAIN. ca.98% of Japan is racially ethnically Japanese. As in BOTH sides of one's family are racially Japanese. Aside from the few US military who are stationed there, its extremely rare for ordinary Japanese to come into daily contact with blacks. Japanese isn't an easy language for whites to learn, much less for blacks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @dcite
    A lot of people here don't get out much, although your reference to the young and social media porn, is good information. I know white women who have dated, or even lived with/married, blacks. They are not fixated, as a rule. I don't know why, as I don't ask too many questions, but they mostly find out it just doesn't work. There is far more to life than sex, and I even wonder how that can really be compatible in races so different in their mentality, for so much of sex happens in the mind and heart. Even physically I recall the aversion to it when discussed in high school by more or less free spirited persons. You can get used to almost anything though. The success rate for bm/wf partners is very low, and has a very high incidence of violence. Wm/bf are more near the average rate of success, but even there the male half is in more danger than if he were with a white or Asian. There are successful bw marriages, but not many. Most of the sex is among young people who don't know what the hell they're doing, and just hope they use birth control, because they ALWAYS regret the results if they don't.
    btw, Caucasoid populations in Asia and parts of Africa have lived in close proximity for centuries, and envy on the part of the whites (as they call themselves) is not characteristic. More often, aspiration to more Caucasoid features is desired by both races.

    Regarding white women who date/marry black men, I believe the part about them not being fixated but it doesn’t matter because the damage is done. The issue is that social structure that has come to form where blacks are celebrated, their shortcomings are blamed on whites, and white abilities are said to come from cultural appropriation (if all black achievement in the past 500 years is total and quantified, does it equal howitzer canon?). Many white girls are left with mixed race children and a man must be the cuck of cucks to raise those kids. Maybe a great man would do it, but one thing is for sure: at the prime of her beauty, the wife gave herself to another man who doesn’t look like you. Overall destabalization takes place because no one wants to marry, or invest in a woman, if he believes she prefers something else. The male ego is too sensitive (a good thing as that can result in staggering amounts of productivity to provide for the mate).

    To anyone interested in the realities of interracial dating, I urge you to read r/happas. The sheer unadulterated pain in that forum should give anyone pause. People who dismiss it as sniveling are idiotic. There is a lot of pain in many interracial relationships; sometimes at the child’s level.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/hapas/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • nok says:

    The writer of this article is not only ignorant of African history, he is also a racist… Every thing he know about Africa is after the invasion of Africa by slave raiders who later became colonial masters. to which after their invasion of Africa, they deliberately destroyed,twisted and obliterate some parts of our history, destroyed our heritage, contaminated our value system and stole some of our artifacts which are littered in various museums round the world.

    He should do more research in to African history, culture and heritage..

    The Benin empire was one of the most sophisticated empires in Africa before it fell to the white invaders

    The fulani have had contacts with the Arabs long before the British conquest and they were literate in Arabic studies.

    The igbos of Nigeria had a well developed writing system know as the Nsibidi which they shared with the Effiks and ibibios. They also had a well developed and flourishing metallurgical industry before it was destroyed and stolen by the in coming slave raiders. The Igbo-Ukwu bronzes amazed the world with a very high level of technical and artistic proficiency and sophistication which was at this time distinctly more advanced than bronze casting in Europe.[2] Peter Garlake compares the Igbo-Ukwu bronzes “to the finest jewelry of rococo Europe or of Carl Faberge,”[3] and William Buller Fagg states they were created with “a strange rococo almost Faberge type virtuosity.”[4] Frank Willett says that the Igbo-Ukwu bronzes portray a standard that is comparable to that established by Benvenuto Cellini five hundred years later in Europe.[5] Denis Williams calls them “an exquisite explosion without antecedent or issue.”[6] One of the objects found, a water pot set in a mesh of simulated rope is described by Hugh Honour and John Fleming as

    A virtuoso feat of cire perdue (lost wax) casting. Its elegant design and refined detailing are matched by a level of technical accomplishment that is notably more advanced than European bronze casting of this period.[2]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeology_of_Igbo-Ukwu

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    The Benin empire was one of the most sophisticated empires in Africa
     
    I know. I've created one of those in my backyard a few weeks ago.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor
    What Whites are intimidated by are civil rights laws and their enforcement by left-wing urban political regimes that will subject you to exemplary sentencing if you dare defend yourself. If not for this and the gun grabbing there wouldn’t be any White flight.

    Sam the Sham, you just proved my point.

    You said whites need to defend themselves with guns. With GUNS. Why with bullets? Because blacks are more muscled and more aggressive.

    If that weren't so, whites could just fight with fists and remain secure and safe. But even though there are tough whites and not-so-tough blacks, the fact is an average matchup between Negro and White guy is gonna be like Ali vs Quarry. I've seen it too many times.

    Whenever there was fight in the schoolyard, the kids would yell, 'a fight, a fight, a ni**er and a white' and usually, it was totally one-sided. White kids feared to hear 'after school!' by a Negro that meant 'after school, I's gonna kick your white ass.'
    Was it always like this? No. Sure, there were friends and nice negroes too. There was a game that white kids and black kids used to play together in 4th grade called 'suck my dic*'. Kids would compete to see who could assemble the wooden puzzle faster, and the loser would have to 'suck' the winner's thing. Of course, it wasn't done literally, but the loser had to have his face pressed against the groin of the winner. But even in this friendly game, blacks had an advantage. If a black kid won, he could make sure that the white kid 'sucked' his dic*. But if the white kid won, the black kid would just laugh and welsh on the bet, and the weaker white kid couldn't do anything about it. One time, the winning white kid had to beg the loser black kid to do it, but the black kid just cackled and cheated by just rubbing his nappy head on the white kid's groin instead of going full-frontal with the face.
    So, the fact is blacks had a decisive advantage over whites. Anyway, now you know why it's usually black guys who are buggering white guys in prison.

    Your point about GUNS implies that whites need guns and license to use it liberally to be safe against blacks.
    But this is unworkable in the long run. What are you gonna do? Pull out a gun every time you see a black guy acting funny?
    Also, what about schools? Kids can't have guns, so white kids will be pushed around by black kids.

    And even in nice neighborhoods with nice negroes integrated with whites, whites will still be disadvantaged. The nice negro will still do better in sports and he will be humping all the white ho's in school, and white boys will get second servings if that. Look at Colin Kaperinick the Negro. He was raised by a white family in a nice community. So, what did he? He excelled in sports and porked all the white girls. So, even with nice negroes, it just leads to cuckery on the part of whites.
    White grandparents raised Obama and he went to nice white schools. So, what did he? According to the bio, he was humping white girls all over the place. If a bisexual closet-homo like Obama acts like that, imagine what the hulking nice negroes are doing.

    According to the bio, he was humping white girls all over the place. If a bisexual closet-homo like Obama acts like that, imagine what the hulking nice negroes are doing.

    Obama wasn’t humping any girls. Ever. School mates and acquaintences (he didn’t exactly have friends) who hung out with him on the beach during the 70s remember him as a totally committed homosexual who favored older, white men. He was also unable to tell the truth, even when it had neutral results.
    Except in the official, PR, ghost written bios, there were no meaningful relationships with women of any color. Michelle is another thing. I don’t want to go there.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @K
    And everything i said about my experiences in st.kitts is absolutely true. I never for a single moment felt 'unsafe' even at any time of the night even when i was alone walking in a poor alleyway.

    Neither did any of my friends encounter anything bad. The locals were the sweetest best people i came across. The most they did was to call us as talib (we are south-asian) as it was just after 9/11 i went there but it was in jest and thats it. The only bad experience i had was weirdly from a 'white person' not a black person. He was either portugese or spanish i am not sure. He owned a bar in that place. But blacks never threatened us in anyway

    Seems like the arrival of illicit drugs changed everything.

    You put “white person” in quotes, as in your only bad experience was “weirdly from a ‘white person.’ You’re only bad experience. Weirdly. Interesting. So does weirdly having an only bad experience with a black person in a predominantly white area analgous? Because we have those all the time. But it’s not “weird.”
    The owners of bars and other tourist traps are not going to “bother” you. They want to make money and form a fairly small percentage of the total population. Tourists do not go beyond a certain pale (no pun intended). If these islands are so safe, then they must have sent all their dangerous people to the U.S., because here aside from a few entrepreneurs, they continue the tradition of making a neighborhood high crime and dangerous.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @oooff
    I think Priss Factor is correct. Black people have a very strong physical presence and many young black men have tremendous unwarranted confidence. In high school, my daughter was the recipient of many dick pics from black males accompanied by bold assertions of a brotha's superiority. Older white people do not realize how bad things are for the young. First whites are a minority and second everything white is seen as unearned. So if white achievement is simply on the backs of minorities, then anyone could have accomplished "white" achievement. If that is the case that white achievement is not the result of white intelligence, then blacks with their overt presence must be superior to whites because they have the same native intelligence, but an obvious superior physicality. Since black guys are bigger and stronger and since the mothers and fathers of white boys choose to neuter their own sons via advancing notions of "white privilege" and "diversity," white boys are cucked by societal structure. They must then watch as a high fraction of white girls get with black boys (it is not a lie). Since black boys are so often very different in personality and physicality, and since young nubile women are the prize of society, it must devastate the psyche to realize that people such as yourself are not the object of desire (see the happas at reddit). Of course, female desire is pushed in this direction by the parents of the white boys who advance "diversity" and lie about white achievement, so the situation is tragic. The situation is worse because you don't need young white men underperforming since there is zero chance that young black men are going to pick up the slack. While I am not against interracial relationship because there are wonderful people of all races, and terrible people of all races, the problem is that white parents are basically creating a structure that amplifies black qualities and lowers white qualities. This cannot be good for society. What white man is going to invest heavily in his family and push to his limits if he thinks his wife, at some level, prefers a man so different from himself. I would say black people have as much to lose as whites from this very reality.

    A lot of people here don’t get out much, although your reference to the young and social media porn, is good information. I know white women who have dated, or even lived with/married, blacks. They are not fixated, as a rule. I don’t know why, as I don’t ask too many questions, but they mostly find out it just doesn’t work. There is far more to life than sex, and I even wonder how that can really be compatible in races so different in their mentality, for so much of sex happens in the mind and heart. Even physically I recall the aversion to it when discussed in high school by more or less free spirited persons. You can get used to almost anything though. The success rate for bm/wf partners is very low, and has a very high incidence of violence. Wm/bf are more near the average rate of success, but even there the male half is in more danger than if he were with a white or Asian. There are successful bw marriages, but not many. Most of the sex is among young people who don’t know what the hell they’re doing, and just hope they use birth control, because they ALWAYS regret the results if they don’t.
    btw, Caucasoid populations in Asia and parts of Africa have lived in close proximity for centuries, and envy on the part of the whites (as they call themselves) is not characteristic. More often, aspiration to more Caucasoid features is desired by both races.

    Read More
    • Replies: @oooff
    Regarding white women who date/marry black men, I believe the part about them not being fixated but it doesn't matter because the damage is done. The issue is that social structure that has come to form where blacks are celebrated, their shortcomings are blamed on whites, and white abilities are said to come from cultural appropriation (if all black achievement in the past 500 years is total and quantified, does it equal howitzer canon?). Many white girls are left with mixed race children and a man must be the cuck of cucks to raise those kids. Maybe a great man would do it, but one thing is for sure: at the prime of her beauty, the wife gave herself to another man who doesn't look like you. Overall destabalization takes place because no one wants to marry, or invest in a woman, if he believes she prefers something else. The male ego is too sensitive (a good thing as that can result in staggering amounts of productivity to provide for the mate).

    To anyone interested in the realities of interracial dating, I urge you to read r/happas. The sheer unadulterated pain in that forum should give anyone pause. People who dismiss it as sniveling are idiotic. There is a lot of pain in many interracial relationships; sometimes at the child's level.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/hapas/
    , @Truth

    Wm/bf are more near the average rate of success,
     
    In every survey I've seen these are the happiest most successful marriages.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • jb says:

    Personally I was delighted with McWhorter’s article! That a respected black academic, writing in a semi-respected mainstream publication, should acknowledge the possibility that the black/white IQ gap might be genetic, is huge progress!!! This, along with the Vox article he references, have left me feeling more optimistic that I have in quite a while.

    Everything else is just nitpicking. Let McWhorter have his opinion on the origin of the gap. Frankly, while I think he is wrong, I don’t think it’s a crazy argument, and in fact I can’t rule out the possibility that some version of it might be right. In fact I would like to defend McWhorter here as someone who has shown an amazing amount of intellectual courage and integrity. To acknowledge even the possibility of genetic IQ differences, not to mention writing of antiracism as our new national religion, takes real bravery, and I salute him for it.

    Of course I agree with Spencer Quinn that if low achievement by blacks is going to be taken as proof of racist oppression by whites, then whites ought to be able to defend themselves by bringing up IQ. However I notice that both McWhorter and Quinn miss an interesting distinction: the distinction between the existence of the gap, and its origin. The thing is, whether or not the IQ gap is genetic or cultural, it exists, and that fact alone has great consequences. McWhorter might have argued that whites could bring up IQ to argue against affirmative action and white guilt, but shouldn’t bring genetics into it. (In fact from a tactical point of view I think this is often the better approach even for white nationalists). But instead he argues against bringing up IQ at all, and here I think his argument fails. But as I said, this is nitpicking — at this point I am just really happy with the progress being made.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jim K.
    Whites supremacists must feel so low these days, with the obvious decline of America and the ascent of China that the only hope left for them is to feel superior to blacks! How sad indeed. Just read some of the comments to this useless article.

    Yuh, sure there are a few white-robe-wearing types around this joint, but a lot of us find this topic interesting because, well, it’s interesting — both as a matter of scientific inquiry and as a reflection of the state of the culture. In a few decades or so, I’m guessing that this matter is going to be finally settled by science unless the people looking into it are so starved of funds and feel so personally threatened by the deluge of hate and invective aimed at them that, in the absence of extraordinary moral courage, they’ll all look for other areas of research. But science usually produces its own momentum, and I’m counting on this to carry the research forward.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    Things that had to be done were done but at fraction of costs what you told to believe.
    Russia was no paradise in the first place when Bolsheviks came to power. it was hell and Stalin did turn things around.
    Russia paid price for delayed changes that should have taken place 100 years prior.
    Regarding Khrushchev, if you believe that traitorous liar and imbecile, it is your problem.

    “Stalin did turn things around.”

    I’ll just let that one sentence of yours stand alone. Assuming that you’re not engaging in some kind of whimsical trollery, I just want to admire the audaciousness of its irony and the elegance of its stupidity.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Stripes Duncan
    What happened to your friend's unfortunate brother in savage New York City has no bearing on why you were treated differently than white people would be treated on St. Kitts.

    I think you know that and that's why you tried to make an apples-to-oranges comparison for effect.

    Let me ask you something, why was i or my friends treated differently in st.kitts?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Nobody
    That the obsession with racial IQ is unhinged can be demonstrated with a simple observation: if whites are so clever, what accounts for white susceptibility to the stupidities of liberalism, feminism, and black identity politics? Evidently, high IQ is not protection against self-emasculation. Or stupidity.

    An equally simple obvservation is that it is about averages and that it is better for your population of fellow taxpayers and voters to have an average (approx normally distributed) IQ of 105 than 95, or 100 for that matter, not to put too much weight on the accuracy of measurement.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @FX Enderby
    Sure! No gulags, no hunger, no terror. The USSR was indeed a worker's paradise and Stalin was a teddy bear.

    Seriously, in Khrushchev's autobiography he wrote about having to extract grain from near-starving Ukrainian farmers under Stalin's orders to fulfill arbitrary agricultural quotas (this was in the 1940's and 50's - when things were improving after WWII).

    Communism was a system of lies with perverse incentives that maximised human suffering.

    Things that had to be done were done but at fraction of costs what you told to believe.
    Russia was no paradise in the first place when Bolsheviks came to power. it was hell and Stalin did turn things around.
    Russia paid price for delayed changes that should have taken place 100 years prior.
    Regarding Khrushchev, if you believe that traitorous liar and imbecile, it is your problem.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hairway To Steven
    "Stalin did turn things around."

    I'll just let that one sentence of yours stand alone. Assuming that you're not engaging in some kind of whimsical trollery, I just want to admire the audaciousness of its irony and the elegance of its stupidity.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @OilcanFloyd
    Isn't Ashkenazi iq in Israel much lower than Ashkenazi iq outside of Israel? If so, that may be a result of the need to produce a full society that includes soldiers, farmers, service people, etc., and Ashkenazim also do those things in Israel in fairly large numbers.

    The first time I came across iq figures for Ashkenazim was in an old psychology or anthropology book I found in my high school library. The figure given was 103 or 105, which seems to have been standard for a long time. The book was probably published in the 1950s or 60s, if that means much. Where did the extra 10-12 iq points that are lately attributed to diaspora Ashkenazim come from?

    I recall some article by Ron Unz noting the Flynn-on-speed increase of measured American Jewish IQs from I think about 1920 to 1950. Ron usuallly gets that sort of thing pretty well right so it might be worth hunting down.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Yojimbo/Zatoichi
    Ok, then get in line for reparations. Lord knows you and your kind deserve it for having ancestor(s) who were once enslaved. Go ahead. Apply for reparations for hundreds of yrs of slavery since the price paid to blacks hasn't been paid in full as of 2017.

    Go ahead.

    “Ok, then get in line for reparations. Lord knows you and your kind deserve it for having ancestor(s) who were once enslaved. Go ahead. Apply for reparations for hundreds of yrs of slavery since the price paid to blacks hasn’t been paid in full as of 2017. Go ahead.”

    Dude, I’m a white American man who is married with children. Besides, had you been paying closer attention, prominent black people have responded that slave reparation money would be foolishly spent.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yojimbo/Zatoichi
    That's not the same as saying that they unanimously are vs. receiving reparations. They missed getting it under Obama, but give it time, another administration will surely bring it up.

    Do show where they unanimously (via their appointed leaders) said, "Know what? We don't want any free money thru reparations. Whitey, ya'll can keep your money. We're fine." I mean, free give aways works for families of Michael Brown and others. Why not for the whole community in one fell swoop?

    Someone needs to inform Ta-Nehesi Coates that his community doesn't want reparations, he seems to think its a legitimate issue to push.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Whites supremacists must feel so low these days, with the obvious decline of America and the ascent of China that the only hope left for them is to feel superior to blacks! How sad indeed. Just read some of the comments to this useless article.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hairway To Steven
    Yuh, sure there are a few white-robe-wearing types around this joint, but a lot of us find this topic interesting because, well, it's interesting -- both as a matter of scientific inquiry and as a reflection of the state of the culture. In a few decades or so, I'm guessing that this matter is going to be finally settled by science unless the people looking into it are so starved of funds and feel so personally threatened by the deluge of hate and invective aimed at them that, in the absence of extraordinary moral courage, they'll all look for other areas of research. But science usually produces its own momentum, and I'm counting on this to carry the research forward.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @K
    I am guessing you mean because i was south-asian they were nice to me? If thats the case, let me tell you another incident. A friend of mine who was also a student of the college i studied in st.kitts was south-asian too. She was from newyork. She had a brother, who was 'killed' in new-york city by blacks who entered into his car while he was in the wrong part of the city. They robbed him and then killed him.

    Blacks in newyork killed a south-asian, but blacks in the caribbean rarely even looked at south-asians in a threatening way.

    What happened to your friend’s unfortunate brother in savage New York City has no bearing on why you were treated differently than white people would be treated on St. Kitts.

    I think you know that and that’s why you tried to make an apples-to-oranges comparison for effect.

    Read More
    • Replies: @K
    Let me ask you something, why was i or my friends treated differently in st.kitts?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jeff77450
    Mr. Quinn, as with essentially everyone on the Right you and I are probably 90% in agreement on the various issues---but we aren't 100% in agreement. The fact that you & I and Steve Sailer, John Derbyshire, Gavin McInnes, Jonah Goldberg, George Will, David Brooks, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, William Kristol, Paul Ryan, Rand Paul--and a thousand others--don't agree on literally *everything* doesn't make us bad people and doesn't mean that we can't find common ground in order to fight the common foe, i.e. the Left in its various loathsome manifestations. As an aside, I am *very* unhappy with *anyone* who advocates for open borders, as some on the Right do, and I won't vote for them in a primary. But that doesn't mean that if they're in office that we can't work with them on other issues like ending affirmative action, deficit reduction and shrinking government.

    I said all that to say this: Arguments for why slavery in America, followed by a hundred years of Jim Crow, wasn't "that bad" just never, ever work. It's kind of like saying that the serial killer who "just" kills his victims isn't as bad as the serial killer who rapes & tortures his victims before killing them and then eating them. I know which one I'd rather have kill me but it still sucks big time. I *strongly* urge you to not make that argument in the future. Continue to fight the good fight and have a nice weekend. --Jeff York writing from Houston, Texas

    The fact that you (or anyone else) would even need to write that last paragraph — that is, that there was actually someone out there who hadn’t already figured that fairly simple truth out for himself — is what I find so interesting.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Yeah, all five of them. Japan remains ca.98% racially Asian (fully Japanese).

    I didn’t say Japan as of NOW is filled with Negroes.

    I said it may happen in the future.

    Why?

    Because even though there are few blacks in Japan now, Negropholia is a cancer in Japan, and cancer spreads. No matter how small it begins, it spread and spreads and never stops spreading.

    Even in the past, there were some blacks in Japan, mostly due to US military presence and rappers/jazz artists. But back then, Japan regarded them as a mere presence, not some ideal to promote. Things are different now.

    1. Japanese no longer have the kind of pride they did. Most Japanese grew up as only-child. This happened over three generations, and this means many Japanese have no uncles, aunts, cousins, nieces, nephews. The kind of Japanese family culture seen in Ozu films are gone.
    Instead, Japanese kids grew up as single kids identifying with comic books, video games, professional fighters, and etc. So, Japanese grew up as loners, not as members of family instilled with Japanese culture and identity.

    2. Japanese have become more accepting of foreign domination. The most sacred sport of Japan is sumo, but Japanese allowed Mongols to totally take over and break all records. Now, Mongols are East Asians and similar to Japanese, but this should be humiliating, but Japan just accepted it like a bitch. Mongols failed to invade Japan but now they did. But what is interesting is how Japanese didn’t take measures to stop importation of Mongols. MORE were brought to whup Japanese even more. It wont’ be long before Negroes enter and totally whup all Japanese and hump the ho’s.

    3. Anime, manga, video games, and J-pop made Japanese favor fantasy over reality. Also, these are all trans-racial and Japanese are mentally wanna-be-whites. But there is growing rap culture, and Japanese are into black culture. Many Japanese girls try to be gangsta and grow up listening rap. This means many young Japanese feel more globo-Afro than Japanese.

    4. There is a whole subculture where Japanese women seek out black men. A military guy who spent a lot of time in Yokohama told me that many Japanese women are into jungaru fever. And Japanese men are a bunch of cucks. He told me cuck culture is there in Japan too. Japanese men have white men and black men hump their ho’s, and cuck pornography is a big thing in Japan. Jus think about it. Japan has few blacks, but their culture is already like this.

    5. Already, children of Japanese women who went with blacks are making big splash in media and sports. Some mulatto was Ms. Japan, and mulatto Japanese win Olympic medals. This makes Japanese see mulatto-ism as a good thing since it wins blings for Japan. Never mind that these mulattoes are products of Japanese women rejecting Japanese men as inferior.

    In the past, there were some mulattoes in Japan, but Japanese treated them like other minorities. Nuisance that had to be tolerated. But now, Japanese are promoting such people as the new ideal.
    Also, as US dominates global discourse, mistreatment of blacks is a far bigger issue than, say, mistreating other minorities. So, Japanese have imbibed ‘white guilt’ and try to prove that it is a ‘good nation’ by being pro-black. This will remove stigma from race-mixing, and more Japanese women will go black and have mulatto babies. Blacks, like Jews and homos, must get special consideration since they are protected by globalism as special people. If Japanese mistreat Iranian minorities, who cares? But if some Negro cries ‘racism’ in Japan, it’s in the NY Times.

    6. Japanese men have already lost sexual confidence. By some news accts, 50% of Japanese men have given up on sex and marriage and look forward to buying sex robots. And 80% of Japanese women say they are sexually unsatisfied. Now, combine those factors with globalism, Liberal Japanese media’s promotion of diversity-blacks-interracism, and you now have a mechanism in place to expand more interracism with blacks.

    7. Japanese now feel morally defensive about their homogeneity. They don’t feel proud of it and apologize when pressed about it. In the past, Japanese were proud about their homogeneity and wrote books about how Japanese are a unique people. Now, such ideas are absent, and Japanese media push interracism and diversity.

    So, when we take into account all these factors, the problem of interracism isn’t just a wound. It is now a cancer, and it will accelerate.

    We are told that Shinzo Abe is right-wing and ultra-nationalist, but it’s of no use. As Japan is whore nation of the US, it can’t do much with its so-called nationalism. What matters is what happens among the people, and they are cucked, infantilized(with kawaii culture), atomized and isolated, and globalized.

    And Japanese women have lost respect in Japanese men who now act and talk like pansies and dorks. And easy travel makes it possible for Japanese women to seeking Negro men. And as it’s no longer frowned upon by Japanese society, it will spread and spread. Also, Japanese women are raised to be whores. Their fathers are TV-addicted morons and their mothers are whores themselves into adultery and stuff.

    Japanese power was always collective and traditional. It’s a delicate ecology. As individuals, Japanese are vulnerable. Japanese men are small and can be whupped by any man. Also, they are timid and lack personality. IN the past, Japanese men and women were part of a cultural ecology, and they married according to collective rules and customs. But as they’ve broken down, atomized Japanese men withdraw into video game land, and Japanese women seek out better men or watch TV soap for fantasy.

    It is a cancer.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous White Male
    "Japanese now feel morally defensive about their homogeneity. They don’t feel proud of it and apologize when pressed about it. In the past, Japanese were proud about their homogeneity and wrote books about how Japanese are a unique people. Now, such ideas are absent, and Japanese media push interracism and diversity."

    "And Japanese women have lost respect in Japanese men who now act and talk like pansies and dorks. And easy travel makes it possible for Japanese women to seeking Negro men. And as it’s no longer frowned upon by Japanese society, it will spread and spread. Also, Japanese women are raised to be whores. Their fathers are TV-addicted morons and their mothers are whores themselves into adultery and stuff."

    "As individuals, Japanese are vulnerable. Japanese men are small and can be whupped by any man. Also, they are timid and lack personality. IN the past, Japanese men and women were part of a cultural ecology, and they married according to collective rules and customs. But as they’ve broken down, atomized Japanese men withdraw into video game land, and Japanese women seek out better men or watch TV soap for fantasy."

    Perhaps you can show us the data that makes this reality and not just the personal opinions of a black willy obsessed troll that got his butt kicked by blacks in school, apparently engaged with blacks in fellatio, and comes to this site to spread gossip, half-truths, distortions and irrational personal opinions. Say, Prissy, have you ever lived in Japan?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    You also shill that blacks have bigger voices and this makes Whites respect blacks as ‘masterful’. Oh, you mean that blacks are louder and noisier than Whites? Are you White? Do you respect blacks as “masterful”?

    It doesn’t matter what I think. I have zero power in the world. What matters is global perception.

    This Jungalo-Cuck video got 500 million views. Today, ideology and creeds are irrelevant in the culture war that is about sensationalization of animalism.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ekZEVeXwek

    White girls and all girls worldwide are growing up to images and sounds like that. That is presented as ‘innocent’ entertainment(as there are much raunchier stuff). At the Ariana concert in UK there were many little girls.

    Rightists bitch about Muslims, Sharia, and that nonsense, but for every person in the west who reads the Koran, a 10,000 listen to rap and music like song above. This is why even Japanese women are seeking out black men and having kids with them and raising them to beat Japanese in Japan. And PC forces in Japan are elevating mulattoes like royalty. Globalism is a worldwide tsunami that spreads Afromania all over.

    But because of hurt white male pride and because honest discussion about blacks is deemed ‘racist by PC, even rightists would rather bitch about sharia and Muslims instead. Rightists who pretend that Muslims are the main threat are really just alt-cucks. They attack Muslims for blowing up Ariana Grande concert(as 'western liberty') when what her ilk is promoting has more dire consequences for the white race.

    Pop Culture is THE culture in the West. It is more powerful than any religion, ideology, political party, etc. Indeed, the rise of homomania owes to the pop-culturalization of society where moral values are now about appeasing celebrities. Video games pop music, and blockbuster movies are even at the center of serious discourse among elites and academics. Mothers and daughters read the same 50 shades of grey novels.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ypg71Aixwc

    Now, what is the MAIN theme of Pop Culture? Other than homomania, is it not Jungle Fever and ACOWW? Who can deny this?

    So, while so many people discuss ‘serous’ ideas, the future is really being determined by the power of idols and sensations, by the siren calls of pop culture. Apollo has lost out to Dionysus and Aphrodite is now Afrodite into having mulatto babies.

    Just do the math. Millions upon millions of Africans are coming to Europe. EU culture is now pop culture. Furthermore, interracism, esp between black male and white female, is promoted by both pop culture and PC. Hollywood even plans to make next Bond 007.

    It’s not about what I think. I can agree with you 100%, and it won’t make the slightest difference.
    The fact is globalism worships the magic negro and mandingo. That crazy novel is now becoming the unspoken ideology of the West via pop culture. It says “white girl liberation means running to Negro, and white makes better accept and even praise this or else be called ‘racist’.” Even though kids are made to read TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD, the pop culture that they really obsess over is about MANDINGO. PC professes Mockingbird, Pop Culture promotes Mandingo. (Mandingo is the novel that should really be included in the curriculum.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandingo_(novel)

    So, what is the bigger threat to UK? Muslims and odd cases of terrorism OR massive Afro-colonization of white wombs via idolatry and mass immivasion?

    Just think. Even if I agree with you 100%, would it make any difference to current dire trends?

    “And PC forces in Japan are elevating mulattoes like royalty. ”

    Yeah, all five of them. Japan remains ca.98% racially Asian (fully Japanese). They don’t accept many refugees, let alone immigrants. Remember, Brazilians about some thirty yrs ago were sent back to Brazil (certainly some of them had African heitage mixed in).

    Japan remains an exception to the rule: Ethnicity trumps Mandingo.

    You have the right to your own opinions, not your own facts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    Hate fact --> 12.5 million Africans were shipped to the New World. 10.7 million survived the dreaded Middle Passage, disembarking in North America, the Caribbean and South America.

    So, Stan, you can massage the numbers all you want, but the truth remains that greedy Europeans enslaved Africans by force.

    "America failed miserably at the “genocide” often claimed by negro activists. America committed “reverse genocide” by converting 400,000 imports into 4,800,009 low IQ “African Americans.”

    [Laughs] you mean WHITES committed "reverse genocide", if even such a term exists.

    " If these slaves had it so bad, they could easily have overwhelmed their master, his wife, and children in the middle of the night when they were not guarded and completely vulnerable."

    And go where, genius? The bottom line is that in general slaves were treated poorly. Chiefly, they had their freedom taken from them.

    If slaves had it so good, prove it. Become a slave. See how you like it.

    Ok, then get in line for reparations. Lord knows you and your kind deserve it for having ancestor(s) who were once enslaved. Go ahead. Apply for reparations for hundreds of yrs of slavery since the price paid to blacks hasn’t been paid in full as of 2017.

    Go ahead.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Ok, then get in line for reparations. Lord knows you and your kind deserve it for having ancestor(s) who were once enslaved. Go ahead. Apply for reparations for hundreds of yrs of slavery since the price paid to blacks hasn’t been paid in full as of 2017. Go ahead."

    Dude, I'm a white American man who is married with children. Besides, had you been paying closer attention, prominent black people have responded that slave reparation money would be foolishly spent.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W234NiTkBO4

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Logan
    Women do not have either lower mean or median IQs. Both are essentially identical to males.

    However, men are more variable, meaning there are fewer "average" men and more high-IQ and low-IQ men than women.

    “However, men are more variable, meaning there are fewer “average” men and more high-IQ and low-IQ men than women.”

    Exactly. So the more high-IQ brothas with IQs circa high 90′s to low 100′s will go for “average” women of mean IQs of 100. Which tend to leave white men out in the cold.

    Thank you for making the point.

    Have a good day.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    Also, perhaps I could shame the NR editors into showing at least a little self-respect during their long, sad goodbye. Guys, even for cucks, this is cucking.

    Good article, but it too cucks by pretending that the main problem is about IQ.

    Seriously, if blacks had lower IQ but had the physique of Emmanuel Lewis, would it matter?

    No, the real threat to whites is muscular, vocal, and genital.

    Blacks are more muscular and destroy white pride by kicking white butt.
    Blacks got bigger voices and this makes whites respect blacks as 'masterful'.
    Blacks got bigger dongs, and jungle fever further humiliates white men cuz of ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of white wombs.

    Those are the real reasons why whites need safe spaces from blacks.

    Men need pride of manhood for mental health, and white male pride is impossible around blacks due to BAMMAMA factor: blacks are more muscular and more aggressive.

    I think Priss Factor is correct. Black people have a very strong physical presence and many young black men have tremendous unwarranted confidence. In high school, my daughter was the recipient of many dick pics from black males accompanied by bold assertions of a brotha’s superiority. Older white people do not realize how bad things are for the young. First whites are a minority and second everything white is seen as unearned. So if white achievement is simply on the backs of minorities, then anyone could have accomplished “white” achievement. If that is the case that white achievement is not the result of white intelligence, then blacks with their overt presence must be superior to whites because they have the same native intelligence, but an obvious superior physicality. Since black guys are bigger and stronger and since the mothers and fathers of white boys choose to neuter their own sons via advancing notions of “white privilege” and “diversity,” white boys are cucked by societal structure. They must then watch as a high fraction of white girls get with black boys (it is not a lie). Since black boys are so often very different in personality and physicality, and since young nubile women are the prize of society, it must devastate the psyche to realize that people such as yourself are not the object of desire (see the happas at reddit). Of course, female desire is pushed in this direction by the parents of the white boys who advance “diversity” and lie about white achievement, so the situation is tragic. The situation is worse because you don’t need young white men underperforming since there is zero chance that young black men are going to pick up the slack. While I am not against interracial relationship because there are wonderful people of all races, and terrible people of all races, the problem is that white parents are basically creating a structure that amplifies black qualities and lowers white qualities. This cannot be good for society. What white man is going to invest heavily in his family and push to his limits if he thinks his wife, at some level, prefers a man so different from himself. I would say black people have as much to lose as whites from this very reality.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dcite
    A lot of people here don't get out much, although your reference to the young and social media porn, is good information. I know white women who have dated, or even lived with/married, blacks. They are not fixated, as a rule. I don't know why, as I don't ask too many questions, but they mostly find out it just doesn't work. There is far more to life than sex, and I even wonder how that can really be compatible in races so different in their mentality, for so much of sex happens in the mind and heart. Even physically I recall the aversion to it when discussed in high school by more or less free spirited persons. You can get used to almost anything though. The success rate for bm/wf partners is very low, and has a very high incidence of violence. Wm/bf are more near the average rate of success, but even there the male half is in more danger than if he were with a white or Asian. There are successful bw marriages, but not many. Most of the sex is among young people who don't know what the hell they're doing, and just hope they use birth control, because they ALWAYS regret the results if they don't.
    btw, Caucasoid populations in Asia and parts of Africa have lived in close proximity for centuries, and envy on the part of the whites (as they call themselves) is not characteristic. More often, aspiration to more Caucasoid features is desired by both races.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Logan
    Ahh, classic misunderstanding of how statistics work.

    The average for a group, whether median or mean, tells us NOTHING AT ALL about any member of that group.

    Talha may be a super-genius. The average IQ for his country of origin simply does not provide us with any information about his IQ.

    Also, in America the term "Asian" generally refers to East Asians like Chinese, not South Asians like Pakistanis, who have even less in common with Chinese than they do with the Irish.

    So, what's your definition of "white?" Iranians, Armenians, Kurds, Afghans? All live in Asia.

    Actually, I am sincerely curious. A lot of people on this website are obsessed, perhaps justifiably, with the decline of the white race. Seems like the first requisite for determining whether this is occurring would be defining who is and is not white. I have seen some of the oddest claims here. Among those some have pronounced, as if it were common knowledge, to be "not white" include: Russians, Italians, Jews, Greeks and Spanish. Even Irish!

    So what's your definition of "white?" Who's in and who's out?

    The definition of Europe and Asia as different continents is entirely a cultural and racial one, BTW, since there is no logical geographic boundary. There is only the continent of Eurasia.

    Whiteness is on a spectrum. Swedes are whiter than Greeks. Greeks are whiter than Persians. Persians are whiter than Indians. North Indians are whiter than Dravidians, many of whom are completely non-white.

    Jews are a special case. They must always be considered non-white. A failure to do so allows them to subvert and dominate any white society.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Logan
    Fair enough. Thanks for playing.

    However, you have defined "whiteness" not as a race, but as a characteristic. Which means I'm less white than my BIL, who looks like an SS recruiting poster.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Logan
    "So you’re telling me now that the mortality rate amongst sailors was higher than it was amongst livestock"

    Yup.

    You know, Europeans were sailing around African constantly from 1500 on, but European invasion and conquest didn't get going till the middle 19th century. Many centuries after European colonies had been established in Asia and the Americas, mostly much farther away.

    Why do you think that was?

    Because Europeans who went to Africa died. A slave factor on the African coast had an average life expectancy of about six months.

    Europeans sailors who spent weeks or months on the African coast got sick and died in the same way. After the African diseases were to a good extent transplanted to the Caribbean, much the same happened there. Entire armies and fleets disappeared from disease.

    European conquest of Africa didn't start, it couldn't, until medicine finally got something of a handle on disease to where soldiers and traders could survive lone enough to do any good.

    Because Europeans who went to Africa died.

    Which also explains how some of the mulatto descendants of those first Europeans became the “middle men” in part of the slave trade for a few hundred years.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Logan
    Also why Portugal was the only European country with some success at establishing colonies and such in Africa prior to the 19th century. The Portuguese had a considerable strain of African blood from the Moops and from slaves introduced in the late medieval and early modern periods and assimilated into the population.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Logan
    If there was anybody at Jamestown to buy the slaves in 1519, it must have been an enormous shock to King James, who wasn't born til 1566.

    You’ve got a point.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous White Male
    I'm not claiming you're making it up. I'm just pointing out your fixation on black wee wees. Are you aware of it? Everytime there is a thread on black lack of intelligence, you promote what you admitted is a meme. And then you list a few anecdotal sites primarily by and for women. You want to talk about black willies? Why don't you talk about the herd mentality of women and the misery loves company recruiting that accompanies females that do something they regret? You also add the myth that blacks are more muscular and destroy white pride by kicking white butt. And yet Whites are always the strongest weight lifters. And apparently you viewing blacks in an urban environment is your evidence that blacks kick White butt. Like in MMA? Maybe you meant to say they have a larger percentage of muscle mass? This is a ratio concerning body fat. Whites have more body fat, hence they are more buoyant. You know about how "Black Men Can't Swim"? You also shill that blacks have bigger voices and this makes Whites respect blacks as ‘masterful’. Oh, you mean that blacks are louder and noisier than Whites? Are you White? Do you respect blacks as "masterful"?

    You also shill that blacks have bigger voices and this makes Whites respect blacks as ‘masterful’. Oh, you mean that blacks are louder and noisier than Whites? Are you White? Do you respect blacks as “masterful”?

    It doesn’t matter what I think. I have zero power in the world. What matters is global perception.

    This Jungalo-Cuck video got 500 million views. Today, ideology and creeds are irrelevant in the culture war that is about sensationalization of animalism.

    White girls and all girls worldwide are growing up to images and sounds like that. That is presented as ‘innocent’ entertainment(as there are much raunchier stuff). At the Ariana concert in UK there were many little girls.

    Rightists bitch about Muslims, Sharia, and that nonsense, but for every person in the west who reads the Koran, a 10,000 listen to rap and music like song above. This is why even Japanese women are seeking out black men and having kids with them and raising them to beat Japanese in Japan. And PC forces in Japan are elevating mulattoes like royalty. Globalism is a worldwide tsunami that spreads Afromania all over.

    But because of hurt white male pride and because honest discussion about blacks is deemed ‘racist by PC, even rightists would rather bitch about sharia and Muslims instead. Rightists who pretend that Muslims are the main threat are really just alt-cucks. They attack Muslims for blowing up Ariana Grande concert(as ‘western liberty’) when what her ilk is promoting has more dire consequences for the white race.

    Pop Culture is THE culture in the West. It is more powerful than any religion, ideology, political party, etc. Indeed, the rise of homomania owes to the pop-culturalization of society where moral values are now about appeasing celebrities. Video games pop music, and blockbuster movies are even at the center of serious discourse among elites and academics. Mothers and daughters read the same 50 shades of grey novels.

    Now, what is the MAIN theme of Pop Culture? Other than homomania, is it not Jungle Fever and ACOWW? Who can deny this?

    So, while so many people discuss ‘serous’ ideas, the future is really being determined by the power of idols and sensations, by the siren calls of pop culture. Apollo has lost out to Dionysus and Aphrodite is now Afrodite into having mulatto babies.

    Just do the math. Millions upon millions of Africans are coming to Europe. EU culture is now pop culture. Furthermore, interracism, esp between black male and white female, is promoted by both pop culture and PC. Hollywood even plans to make next Bond 007.

    It’s not about what I think. I can agree with you 100%, and it won’t make the slightest difference.
    The fact is globalism worships the magic negro and mandingo. That crazy novel is now becoming the unspoken ideology of the West via pop culture. It says “white girl liberation means running to Negro, and white makes better accept and even praise this or else be called ‘racist’.” Even though kids are made to read TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD, the pop culture that they really obsess over is about MANDINGO. PC professes Mockingbird, Pop Culture promotes Mandingo. (Mandingo is the novel that should really be included in the curriculum.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandingo_(novel)

    So, what is the bigger threat to UK? Muslims and odd cases of terrorism OR massive Afro-colonization of white wombs via idolatry and mass immivasion?

    Just think. Even if I agree with you 100%, would it make any difference to current dire trends?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yojimbo/Zatoichi
    "And PC forces in Japan are elevating mulattoes like royalty. "

    Yeah, all five of them. Japan remains ca.98% racially Asian (fully Japanese). They don't accept many refugees, let alone immigrants. Remember, Brazilians about some thirty yrs ago were sent back to Brazil (certainly some of them had African heitage mixed in).

    Japan remains an exception to the rule: Ethnicity trumps Mandingo.

    You have the right to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    Do you even realize how bad Truth burned you? No, you didn't catch the subtle dig.

    No, I caught it. And you are a cuck.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "No, I caught it."

    Only when it was pointed out to you. You completely missed it.

    "And you are a cuck."

    That's all you have in your verbal assault arsenal. Really pathetic.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Truth
    So you're telling me now that the mortality rate amongst sailors was higher than it was amongst livestock? I'm sure you just made the day of thousands of exotic animals.

    Let me tell you a theory rapidly gaining speed; there was no trans-Atlantic slave trade - all a fraud. Why do people believe this? because there is NOT ONE remnant of a slave ship, anywhere. You can find a 300 year old inkwell at a garage sale, but there is no evidence, other than photos.

    Now that's all interesting, but the "why" is where it really gets mind-blowing; and y'aint ready for that.

    “So you’re telling me now that the mortality rate amongst sailors was higher than it was amongst livestock”

    Yup.

    You know, Europeans were sailing around African constantly from 1500 on, but European invasion and conquest didn’t get going till the middle 19th century. Many centuries after European colonies had been established in Asia and the Americas, mostly much farther away.

    Why do you think that was?

    Because Europeans who went to Africa died. A slave factor on the African coast had an average life expectancy of about six months.

    Europeans sailors who spent weeks or months on the African coast got sick and died in the same way. After the African diseases were to a good extent transplanted to the Caribbean, much the same happened there. Entire armies and fleets disappeared from disease.

    European conquest of Africa didn’t start, it couldn’t, until medicine finally got something of a handle on disease to where soldiers and traders could survive lone enough to do any good.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Because Europeans who went to Africa died.

    Which also explains how some of the mulatto descendants of those first Europeans became the "middle men" in part of the slave trade for a few hundred years.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @OilcanFloyd
    Isn't Ashkenazi iq in Israel much lower than Ashkenazi iq outside of Israel? If so, that may be a result of the need to produce a full society that includes soldiers, farmers, service people, etc., and Ashkenazim also do those things in Israel in fairly large numbers.

    The first time I came across iq figures for Ashkenazim was in an old psychology or anthropology book I found in my high school library. The figure given was 103 or 105, which seems to have been standard for a long time. The book was probably published in the 1950s or 60s, if that means much. Where did the extra 10-12 iq points that are lately attributed to diaspora Ashkenazim come from?

    If there was anybody at Jamestown to buy the slaves in 1519, it must have been an enormous shock to King James, who wasn’t born til 1566.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    You've got a point.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    they are dull, tasteless, and anomalous

    Apparently he found Sally Hemings quite tasty.

    Gold Coast slave ship bound for cotton fields
    Sold in the market down in New Orleans
    Scarred old slaver knows he’s doin’ all right
    Hear him whip the women just around midnight
    Brown Sugar, how come you taste so good
    Brown Sugar, just like a young girl should
    Drums beatin’ cold, English blood runs hot
    Lady of the house wonderin’ when it’s gonna stop
    House boy knows that he’s doin’ all right
    You should have heard him just around midnight
    Brown Sugar, how come you taste so good
    Brown Sugar, just like a young girl should
    Brown Sugar, how come you dance so good
    Brown Sugar, just like a black girl should
    I bet your mama was a Cajun Queen,
    And all her boyfriends were sweet sixteen
    I’m no school boy but I know what I like
    You should have heard them just around midnight
    Brown Sugar, how come you taste so good
    Brown Sugar, just like a black girl should

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Right- but Mediterranean (or Indian Ocean) sailing and Atlantic sailing are two quite different things, as you will appreciate by reading Caesar's account of the Gallic wars, or, really, any account of ancient or medieval sea travel, or by sailing any kind of craft. Norse ships were designed for open-ocean Atlantic sailing; Arab ships and the ships of the various other medieval Mediterranean maritime powers were not.

    Even with Norse-style ships, crossing the Atlantic is a dicey proposition, especially without "modern" (more modern than the Vikings, that is) navigational technology.

    It's certainly possible that you could line up a bunch of dhows, or, heck, even a bunch of rafts (Kon-tiki style), and sail west on them, and maybe some would make landfall, and maybe the sailors on them would still be alive. The possibility seems like a rather shaky basis for a grand theory of racial origins though.

    Some information here: https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/12386/why-did-it-take-so-long-for-humanity-to-be-able-to-cross-the-oceans

    Arab ships and the ships of the various other medieval Mediterranean maritime powers were not.

    Agreed – which is why I stated: “Whether that did happen and if they were successful is another story.” History is usually preparation and initiative coupled with a fair amount of good fortune. It would be nice to discover a couple of hulls in the deep trenches to know if they even attempted though.

    Kon-tiki style

    Expeditions like that one definitely show it is in the realm of theoretical possibility – especially if you take into account actual naval vessels of the time.

    The possibility seems like a rather shaky basis for a grand theory of racial origins though.

    Yeah – though speculation is fun – I’d have to see a lot more evidence to overturn the general consensus.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Right- but Mediterranean (or Indian Ocean) sailing and Atlantic sailing are two quite different things, as you will appreciate by reading Caesar's account of the Gallic wars, or, really, any account of ancient or medieval sea travel, or by sailing any kind of craft. Norse ships were designed for open-ocean Atlantic sailing; Arab ships and the ships of the various other medieval Mediterranean maritime powers were not.

    Even with Norse-style ships, crossing the Atlantic is a dicey proposition, especially without "modern" (more modern than the Vikings, that is) navigational technology.

    It's certainly possible that you could line up a bunch of dhows, or, heck, even a bunch of rafts (Kon-tiki style), and sail west on them, and maybe some would make landfall, and maybe the sailors on them would still be alive. The possibility seems like a rather shaky basis for a grand theory of racial origins though.

    Some information here: https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/12386/why-did-it-take-so-long-for-humanity-to-be-able-to-cross-the-oceans

    And we may talk of Columbus’s sailing, but even he never tried to go ‘railing from Ennis as far as Kilkee.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @George Weinbaum
    In 1785 Thomas Jefferson wrote, "Notes on the State of Virginia". From page 266 in my copy, "Comparing [Negroes] by their faculties of memory, reason, and imagination, it appears to me, that in memory they are equal to the whites; in reason much inferior, as I think one could scarcely be found capable of tracing and comprehending the investigations of Euclid; and that in imagination they are dull, tasteless, and anomalous".
    Here, here.

    they are dull, tasteless, and anomalous

    Apparently he found Sally Hemings quite tasty.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Gold Coast slave ship bound for cotton fields
    Sold in the market down in New Orleans
    Scarred old slaver knows he's doin' all right
    Hear him whip the women just around midnight
    Brown Sugar, how come you taste so good
    Brown Sugar, just like a young girl should
    Drums beatin' cold, English blood runs hot
    Lady of the house wonderin' when it's gonna stop
    House boy knows that he's doin' all right
    You should have heard him just around midnight
    Brown Sugar, how come you taste so good
    Brown Sugar, just like a young girl should
    Brown Sugar, how come you dance so good
    Brown Sugar, just like a black girl should
    I bet your mama was a Cajun Queen,
    And all her boyfriends were sweet sixteen
    I'm no school boy but I know what I like
    You should have heard them just around midnight
    Brown Sugar, how come you taste so good
    Brown Sugar, just like a black girl should
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Talha
    This was basically my point. What is known so far about naval warfare of that area was that some of the African Empires had developed very solid river-faring boats that were necessary to project power and protect trade across the various river networks and deltas in the region. Other than a couple of large lakes, Sub-Saharan Africa doesn't even have major seas. So basically it's rivers and then massive oceans to each side.

    The Sahara also served the role of being a massive sand-ocean in keeping that area isolated from the rest of humanity. Sure nomadic peoples had been crossing it for ages, but nomads don't develop civilizations.

    What is also known - and none of this is controversial, so it hardly needs references - is that the Muslim African elite (men like Mansa Musa, Askiya Muhammad, etc.) used to make Hajj. They obviously didn't make a bee-line across the Sahara as that would have been suicide. Rather, they cut North and then traveled East across the established routes in North Africa. This put them into contact with ancient sea-faring cities like Tunis, Alexandria, even towns like Cairo, etc. For instance, the famous Djinguereber Mosque was built by local man-power, but designed by an Andalusian architect.

    These elite, having seen first-hand what the rest of the world had to offer - were intelligent enough to invite and support men-of-learning from as far away as Persia, Egypt, Morocco and Spain to help seed the knowledge of things like Islamic law (Maliki school mostly), medicine, math, astronomy, etc. Even martial knowledge was transferred - which is one of the reasons you see that the largest and most successful African Empires were Muslim run. After a few centuries, the dissemination of knowledge was completely taken over by scholars of indigenous stock.

    For these reasons, I was mentioning that is not far-fetched to imagine that some of the same elites would have brought over shipwrights and those with maritime knowledge from those areas after having seen some of the most active harbors of the Mediterranean. Kings, with more gold and slaves than they know what to do with, can easily support a pet project like a couple of long-range naval expeditions. Whether that did happen and if they were successful is another story.

    Peace.

    Right- but Mediterranean (or Indian Ocean) sailing and Atlantic sailing are two quite different things, as you will appreciate by reading Caesar’s account of the Gallic wars, or, really, any account of ancient or medieval sea travel, or by sailing any kind of craft. Norse ships were designed for open-ocean Atlantic sailing; Arab ships and the ships of the various other medieval Mediterranean maritime powers were not.

    Even with Norse-style ships, crossing the Atlantic is a dicey proposition, especially without “modern” (more modern than the Vikings, that is) navigational technology.

    It’s certainly possible that you could line up a bunch of dhows, or, heck, even a bunch of rafts (Kon-tiki style), and sail west on them, and maybe some would make landfall, and maybe the sailors on them would still be alive. The possibility seems like a rather shaky basis for a grand theory of racial origins though.

    Some information here: https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/12386/why-did-it-take-so-long-for-humanity-to-be-able-to-cross-the-oceans

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    And we may talk of Columbus's sailing, but even he never tried to go 'railing from Ennis as far as Kilkee.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7w7eH6JuL50
    , @Talha

    Arab ships and the ships of the various other medieval Mediterranean maritime powers were not.
     
    Agreed - which is why I stated: "Whether that did happen and if they were successful is another story." History is usually preparation and initiative coupled with a fair amount of good fortune. It would be nice to discover a couple of hulls in the deep trenches to know if they even attempted though.

    Kon-tiki style
     
    Expeditions like that one definitely show it is in the realm of theoretical possibility - especially if you take into account actual naval vessels of the time.

    The possibility seems like a rather shaky basis for a grand theory of racial origins though.
     
    Yeah - though speculation is fun - I'd have to see a lot more evidence to overturn the general consensus.

    Peace.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Truth

    the difference being that Norse (not necessarily entirely Vikings) routinely sailed long distances in open ocean across the North Atlantic, which (the Atlantic) is a very unfriendly sea, whereas the Arabs do not seem to have done so, much less the pre-Muslim West Africans.

     

    Erik the Red looked different back then:

    https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/fb/3f/1c/fb3f1c8bc87174e2b3156756c736b48b--african-american-culture-native-american-art.jpg

    Bro – your links aren’t working. Maybe it’s just me??!! Getting access denied – even though I logged in.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Oh it was just Olmec in Central America:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=olmec+negros&client=firefox-b&tbm=isch&imgil=Q2vPbObpPhdV-M%253A%253B7qy0Oe0q58FRfM%253Bhttps%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.pinterest.com%25252Fspeekez616%25252Findigenous-africanamerican-culture%25252F&source=iu&pf=m&fir=Q2vPbObpPhdV-M%253A%252C7qy0Oe0q58FRfM%252C_&usg=__1h249ehcDOCmeEq4ndlmYjn63JQ%3D&biw=1280&bih=606&ved=0ahUKEwjC6sP3_4nVAhVV2WMKHWpZB2oQyjcIQQ&ei=f11pWYKvN9WyjwPqsp3QBg#imgrc=Q2vPbObpPhdV-M:
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Good points; the difference being that Norse (not necessarily entirely Vikings) routinely sailed long distances in open ocean across the North Atlantic, which (the Atlantic) is a very unfriendly sea, whereas the Arabs do not seem to have done so, much less the pre-Muslim West Africans.

    Even the Portuguese do not seem to have done so until the radical advances in shipbuilding in the 15th century.

    Sure, there could have been minuscule numbers of Africans or whoever washed up in the New World, but if there was a significant population of their descendents (who would obviously no longer be African in any intelligible sense) there seems little reason for a vast conspiracy across all the Americas and Europe to hide the fact.

    This was basically my point. What is known so far about naval warfare of that area was that some of the African Empires had developed very solid river-faring boats that were necessary to project power and protect trade across the various river networks and deltas in the region. Other than a couple of large lakes, Sub-Saharan Africa doesn’t even have major seas. So basically it’s rivers and then massive oceans to each side.

    The Sahara also served the role of being a massive sand-ocean in keeping that area isolated from the rest of humanity. Sure nomadic peoples had been crossing it for ages, but nomads don’t develop civilizations.

    What is also known – and none of this is controversial, so it hardly needs references – is that the Muslim African elite (men like Mansa Musa, Askiya Muhammad, etc.) used to make Hajj. They obviously didn’t make a bee-line across the Sahara as that would have been suicide. Rather, they cut North and then traveled East across the established routes in North Africa. This put them into contact with ancient sea-faring cities like Tunis, Alexandria, even towns like Cairo, etc. For instance, the famous Djinguereber Mosque was built by local man-power, but designed by an Andalusian architect.

    These elite, having seen first-hand what the rest of the world had to offer – were intelligent enough to invite and support men-of-learning from as far away as Persia, Egypt, Morocco and Spain to help seed the knowledge of things like Islamic law (Maliki school mostly), medicine, math, astronomy, etc. Even martial knowledge was transferred – which is one of the reasons you see that the largest and most successful African Empires were Muslim run. After a few centuries, the dissemination of knowledge was completely taken over by scholars of indigenous stock.

    For these reasons, I was mentioning that is not far-fetched to imagine that some of the same elites would have brought over shipwrights and those with maritime knowledge from those areas after having seen some of the most active harbors of the Mediterranean. Kings, with more gold and slaves than they know what to do with, can easily support a pet project like a couple of long-range naval expeditions. Whether that did happen and if they were successful is another story.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Right- but Mediterranean (or Indian Ocean) sailing and Atlantic sailing are two quite different things, as you will appreciate by reading Caesar's account of the Gallic wars, or, really, any account of ancient or medieval sea travel, or by sailing any kind of craft. Norse ships were designed for open-ocean Atlantic sailing; Arab ships and the ships of the various other medieval Mediterranean maritime powers were not.

    Even with Norse-style ships, crossing the Atlantic is a dicey proposition, especially without "modern" (more modern than the Vikings, that is) navigational technology.

    It's certainly possible that you could line up a bunch of dhows, or, heck, even a bunch of rafts (Kon-tiki style), and sail west on them, and maybe some would make landfall, and maybe the sailors on them would still be alive. The possibility seems like a rather shaky basis for a grand theory of racial origins though.

    Some information here: https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/12386/why-did-it-take-so-long-for-humanity-to-be-able-to-cross-the-oceans

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    Isn't Ashkenazi iq in Israel much lower than Ashkenazi iq outside of Israel? If so, that may be a result of the need to produce a full society that includes soldiers, farmers, service people, etc., and Ashkenazim also do those things in Israel in fairly large numbers.

    The first time I came across iq figures for Ashkenazim was in an old psychology or anthropology book I found in my high school library. The figure given was 103 or 105, which seems to have been standard for a long time. The book was probably published in the 1950s or 60s, if that means much. Where did the extra 10-12 iq points that are lately attributed to diaspora Ashkenazim come from?

    Where did the extra 10-12 iq points that are lately attributed to diaspora Ashkenazim come from?

    Propaganda, most likely – designed to justify the massive over-representation of Jews at the top of the pyramid. Meanwhile, anyone with eyes can see that the sectors dominated by Jews are decidedly not run by geniuses. Just look at the US foreign policy, MSM or Hollywood. They can also see the difference between meritocracy and nepotism.

    In any case, Israel (75% Jewish) scores a mere 95 IQ points while the UK scores 100 in spite of being only ~80% white. Clearly, the whites there already have an advantage and if you want to compare the smartest Jewish sub-tribe (Ashkenazi) it’s only fair to apply the same methodology to the white Brits.

    http://archive.is/z2yxc

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_British

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "Your reference contradicts this regardless of one’s definition of white, unless your definition of “white” is the result of some bizarre gerrymandering that excludes the bulk of Europe."

    There are 27 white countries. There are 28 non-white countries. Figure it out.

    "The rest of your response is irrelevant. Your assertion that whites have a shorter future-time orientation (on average) than blacks has nothing to do with variance or nature/nurture, and it is contradicted by your own reference."

    You are other than accurate. The author clearly stated "We see the usual correlates. Countries that are richer; more Germanic; less corrupt; more intelligent – they all have more future time orientation. In countries that have a Communist legacy future time orientations are perhaps lower than we might expect them to be otherwise".

    There are 27 white countries. There are 28 non-white countries. Figure it out.

    Your ability to change the subject is impressive. Who said anything about white vs non-white? You made a claim about white vs black time preference– specifically, that “whites have a much shorter future-time orientation on average”. I pointed out this is incorrect by your own citation. There are only 2 black countries (Angola and Nigeria) in the cited data. Both have very short “future-time orientation”. To choose some subset of the 27 white countries you count that would lead to a lower average than that between Angola and Nigeria would be quite the tortured definition of “white”.

    You are other than accurate. The author clearly stated “We see the usual correlates. Countries that are richer; more Germanic; less corrupt; more intelligent – they all have more future time orientation. In countries that have a Communist legacy future time orientations are perhaps lower than we might expect them to be otherwise”.

    This is also irrelevant… I’ve made no claims about the effects of Communism, wealth, or intelligence on time-preference.

    You made a plain-as-day error but all you can do is double down.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Good points; the difference being that Norse (not necessarily entirely Vikings) routinely sailed long distances in open ocean across the North Atlantic, which (the Atlantic) is a very unfriendly sea, whereas the Arabs do not seem to have done so, much less the pre-Muslim West Africans.

    Even the Portuguese do not seem to have done so until the radical advances in shipbuilding in the 15th century.

    Sure, there could have been minuscule numbers of Africans or whoever washed up in the New World, but if there was a significant population of their descendents (who would obviously no longer be African in any intelligible sense) there seems little reason for a vast conspiracy across all the Americas and Europe to hide the fact.

    the difference being that Norse (not necessarily entirely Vikings) routinely sailed long distances in open ocean across the North Atlantic, which (the Atlantic) is a very unfriendly sea, whereas the Arabs do not seem to have done so, much less the pre-Muslim West Africans.

    Erik the Red looked different back then:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Bro - your links aren't working. Maybe it's just me??!! Getting access denied - even though I logged in.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Talha
    Hey Truth,

    I'm open to these kinds of theories, especially since we are discovering/unearthing new things all the time. I understand there are a bunch of ideological influences in academia, but I feel more comfortable knowing it's gone through some kind of critical cross-examination process at some public level of discourse (peer review by experts) and survived.

    By the way - the link to the image doesn't work.

    Peace.

    I understand, Talha. Once you did into what the world is, and what it isn’t, then the picture makes much more sense, For instance, you have walked 4 mph, you have driven 50mph in a car, step outside and ask yourself sometime; “am I really moving at 70,000 mph (around the sun) right now, and simultaneously rotating at say, 500mph, (depending upon where you live)? Why does the air miraculously move at 500 mph with me, why don’t mountains swishing through the air at 500mph cause hurricanes?, why are there placid lakes?”etc. Nothing you find that is “critically cross-examined” in the halls of Ivy, will help you with these questions. The link I provided was a quote by General Bin Nasser of Egypt.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • gT says:

    Blacks kids grow up faster, because they had to in Africa, white kids just grow slower. So while black kids might look better at school, from a physical standpoint, when in their twenties and thirties the whites catch up and then just leave the blacks behind in the dirt in the standpoint that really counts, $$$.

    Whites also tend to become heavier at the same height, because white males have wider hips than black males, and whites have better grey matter due to the longer, slower growth cycle.

    So while some can be cocky when younger and talk a lot when they are younger, others can be condescending when older and only their talk matters when they are older.

    Females are status inclined / socially aware, they open their legs to whoever they see as having higher status / social standing at a particular point in time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    Yes, I did.

    Do you even realize how bad Truth burned you? No, you didn’t catch the subtle dig.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    No, I caught it. And you are a cuck.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Talha
    I don't have too difficult of a time believing that some might have been here already in small numbers. Some of the African Empires in that region were very wealthy and had contact with Northern Africa (both knowledge transfer and trade). It is known that some of the African Emperors even had Turkish slaves as imperial guards. Also, many, many historical manuscripts are still being collected and archived. It is not a far fetched idea that a couple of ships were commissioned to be sent that used Turkish or North African Barbary knowledge and staffed by Africans. A bit like the idea that Vikings also reached North America in small numbers.

    But in large, significant numbers? Well, the record on the other side is that there were entire Muslim sultanates like Futa Toro that were predicated on ending the French slave trade in their areas and there is independent documentation in the African Muslim lands (who were quite literate, thank you very much) that attests to the slave trade (some Muslims certainly made money off of it) so it would have to have been a massive conspiracy if we are talking large scale.

    Peace.

    Good points; the difference being that Norse (not necessarily entirely Vikings) routinely sailed long distances in open ocean across the North Atlantic, which (the Atlantic) is a very unfriendly sea, whereas the Arabs do not seem to have done so, much less the pre-Muslim West Africans.

    Even the Portuguese do not seem to have done so until the radical advances in shipbuilding in the 15th century.

    Sure, there could have been minuscule numbers of Africans or whoever washed up in the New World, but if there was a significant population of their descendents (who would obviously no longer be African in any intelligible sense) there seems little reason for a vast conspiracy across all the Americas and Europe to hide the fact.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    the difference being that Norse (not necessarily entirely Vikings) routinely sailed long distances in open ocean across the North Atlantic, which (the Atlantic) is a very unfriendly sea, whereas the Arabs do not seem to have done so, much less the pre-Muslim West Africans.

     

    Erik the Red looked different back then:

    https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/fb/3f/1c/fb3f1c8bc87174e2b3156756c736b48b--african-american-culture-native-american-art.jpg
    , @Talha
    This was basically my point. What is known so far about naval warfare of that area was that some of the African Empires had developed very solid river-faring boats that were necessary to project power and protect trade across the various river networks and deltas in the region. Other than a couple of large lakes, Sub-Saharan Africa doesn't even have major seas. So basically it's rivers and then massive oceans to each side.

    The Sahara also served the role of being a massive sand-ocean in keeping that area isolated from the rest of humanity. Sure nomadic peoples had been crossing it for ages, but nomads don't develop civilizations.

    What is also known - and none of this is controversial, so it hardly needs references - is that the Muslim African elite (men like Mansa Musa, Askiya Muhammad, etc.) used to make Hajj. They obviously didn't make a bee-line across the Sahara as that would have been suicide. Rather, they cut North and then traveled East across the established routes in North Africa. This put them into contact with ancient sea-faring cities like Tunis, Alexandria, even towns like Cairo, etc. For instance, the famous Djinguereber Mosque was built by local man-power, but designed by an Andalusian architect.

    These elite, having seen first-hand what the rest of the world had to offer - were intelligent enough to invite and support men-of-learning from as far away as Persia, Egypt, Morocco and Spain to help seed the knowledge of things like Islamic law (Maliki school mostly), medicine, math, astronomy, etc. Even martial knowledge was transferred - which is one of the reasons you see that the largest and most successful African Empires were Muslim run. After a few centuries, the dissemination of knowledge was completely taken over by scholars of indigenous stock.

    For these reasons, I was mentioning that is not far-fetched to imagine that some of the same elites would have brought over shipwrights and those with maritime knowledge from those areas after having seen some of the most active harbors of the Mediterranean. Kings, with more gold and slaves than they know what to do with, can easily support a pet project like a couple of long-range naval expeditions. Whether that did happen and if they were successful is another story.

    Peace.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Truth
    Another puzzle piece:

    https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/84/be/c0/84bec0fc889c21e30e66e117acc78092--jacob-jacob-black-people.jpg

    Hey Truth,

    I’m open to these kinds of theories, especially since we are discovering/unearthing new things all the time. I understand there are a bunch of ideological influences in academia, but I feel more comfortable knowing it’s gone through some kind of critical cross-examination process at some public level of discourse (peer review by experts) and survived.

    By the way – the link to the image doesn’t work.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    I understand, Talha. Once you did into what the world is, and what it isn't, then the picture makes much more sense, For instance, you have walked 4 mph, you have driven 50mph in a car, step outside and ask yourself sometime; "am I really moving at 70,000 mph (around the sun) right now, and simultaneously rotating at say, 500mph, (depending upon where you live)? Why does the air miraculously move at 500 mph with me, why don't mountains swishing through the air at 500mph cause hurricanes?, why are there placid lakes?"etc. Nothing you find that is "critically cross-examined" in the halls of Ivy, will help you with these questions. The link I provided was a quote by General Bin Nasser of Egypt.

    https://vimeo.com/35196044
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Either that or they walked.

    I don’t have too difficult of a time believing that some might have been here already in small numbers. Some of the African Empires in that region were very wealthy and had contact with Northern Africa (both knowledge transfer and trade). It is known that some of the African Emperors even had Turkish slaves as imperial guards. Also, many, many historical manuscripts are still being collected and archived. It is not a far fetched idea that a couple of ships were commissioned to be sent that used Turkish or North African Barbary knowledge and staffed by Africans. A bit like the idea that Vikings also reached North America in small numbers.

    But in large, significant numbers? Well, the record on the other side is that there were entire Muslim sultanates like Futa Toro that were predicated on ending the French slave trade in their areas and there is independent documentation in the African Muslim lands (who were quite literate, thank you very much) that attests to the slave trade (some Muslims certainly made money off of it) so it would have to have been a massive conspiracy if we are talking large scale.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Good points; the difference being that Norse (not necessarily entirely Vikings) routinely sailed long distances in open ocean across the North Atlantic, which (the Atlantic) is a very unfriendly sea, whereas the Arabs do not seem to have done so, much less the pre-Muslim West Africans.

    Even the Portuguese do not seem to have done so until the radical advances in shipbuilding in the 15th century.

    Sure, there could have been minuscule numbers of Africans or whoever washed up in the New World, but if there was a significant population of their descendents (who would obviously no longer be African in any intelligible sense) there seems little reason for a vast conspiracy across all the Americas and Europe to hide the fact.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    Hate fact --> 12.5 million Africans were shipped to the New World. 10.7 million survived the dreaded Middle Passage, disembarking in North America, the Caribbean and South America.

    So, Stan, you can massage the numbers all you want, but the truth remains that greedy Europeans enslaved Africans by force.

    "America failed miserably at the “genocide” often claimed by negro activists. America committed “reverse genocide” by converting 400,000 imports into 4,800,009 low IQ “African Americans.”

    [Laughs] you mean WHITES committed "reverse genocide", if even such a term exists.

    " If these slaves had it so bad, they could easily have overwhelmed their master, his wife, and children in the middle of the night when they were not guarded and completely vulnerable."

    And go where, genius? The bottom line is that in general slaves were treated poorly. Chiefly, they had their freedom taken from them.

    If slaves had it so good, prove it. Become a slave. See how you like it.

    Hate fact –> 12.5 million Africans were shipped to the New World. 10.7 million survived the dreaded Middle Passage, disembarking in North America, the Caribbean and South America.

    LOL, that’s another thing I ‘ve always wondered, why these guys are “Pan-European” when it’s convenient.

    E.g.: When they see an African in a documentary on Spain:

    “Uuugh, those damn Knee-grows are ruining Europe!!!”

    But, when talking about the slave trade:

    “Hey, it was those nasteee, EEEVIL Spaniards and Portuguese that got most of the slaves, I’m German, ain’t got nothin to do with me.”

    Read More
    • LOL: Talha
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Stan d Mute
    All the slave math seems like fantasy to me, designed solely to paint the negro victim portrait.

    e.g. "400 years" Trope - my math reveals that from Columbus arrival circa 1492AD to the present day is 525 years. But the slave trade TO North America effectively ended in 1833 with the English abolition and the trade within North America ended entirely at the close of the Civil War with the South's surrender in 1865. Further, the first African slaves brought to the North America British colonies appear to be a small group of 20 sold in Jamestown circa 1519AD and the first commercial tobacco crop wasn't until almost a century later in 1612AD (dates from PBS "Slavery and the Making of America"). Let's be extra and use 1519. 400 years later was 1919. Slavery? No. Using 1612 puts us at 2012. Slavery? Perhaps Wage Slavery against whites who are forced into lifelong labor so Government can raise its annual crop of African criminals on welfare.

    And it hardly ends with lying about the duration. As the OP notes, there are enormous issues with the numbers and with the treatment of slaves in America's South. One commenter claimed "daily" ship arrivals for over "300 years". Let's do some more math. A ship might carry 200 Africans to live delivery in the New World. So 200 x 365 = 73,000/yr arriving. 73,000 x 300 = 21,900,000. Obviously a much larger number than the 11,000,000 total brought across the Atlantic according to "experts." So let's try working backwards. 400,000 imported to the Colonies and later States total would yield: 400,000 / 314 = 1,274/yr. That's 1,274 / 200 = 6/ships per year. In Central and South America, with their 10,600,000 imports, 10,600,000 / 314 = 33,758/yr. 33,758 / 200 = 168/ships per year into ALL of Central and South America.

    In regard to treatment, given only 400,000 imports versus the total African population circa 1870, America failed miserably at the "genocide" often claimed by negro activists. America committed "reverse genocide" by converting 400,000 imports into 4,800,009 low IQ "African Americans." And the typical Southern plantation may have had a single white family with more than 20 slaves. If these slaves had it so bad, they could easily have overwhelmed their master, his wife, and children in the middle of the night when they were not guarded and completely vulnerable. Yet they did this so rarely that Nat Turners failed revolt was regarded as Historic. Why? In fact, white masters gave slaves FAR better living conditions than most native Africans enjoyed. They were NEVER eaten. Think about that. African cannibalism was so common as to be mundane. Tribes captured others and simply ate them if they couldn't sell them to stupid white slavers on the coast. Being sent to the coast was a chance at life, while being sent to the captors' villages meant you were on the menu. And being shipped to America was the equivalent of the African lottery of the day. In America, stupid whites would encourage rampant reproduction, provision of Western medical care, clean water, no famine, no cannibalism, potential literacy, etc. This was like lifelong accommodation in the Ritz Carlton compared to life in Africa for the loser captured by another tribe. Brutal? Genocide? You decide, but decide based on life as it really existed in Africa and in America circa 1519-1865.

    Hate fact –> 12.5 million Africans were shipped to the New World. 10.7 million survived the dreaded Middle Passage, disembarking in North America, the Caribbean and South America.

    So, Stan, you can massage the numbers all you want, but the truth remains that greedy Europeans enslaved Africans by force.

    “America failed miserably at the “genocide” often claimed by negro activists. America committed “reverse genocide” by converting 400,000 imports into 4,800,009 low IQ “African Americans.”

    [Laughs] you mean WHITES committed “reverse genocide”, if even such a term exists.

    ” If these slaves had it so bad, they could easily have overwhelmed their master, his wife, and children in the middle of the night when they were not guarded and completely vulnerable.”

    And go where, genius? The bottom line is that in general slaves were treated poorly. Chiefly, they had their freedom taken from them.

    If slaves had it so good, prove it. Become a slave. See how you like it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    Hate fact –> 12.5 million Africans were shipped to the New World. 10.7 million survived the dreaded Middle Passage, disembarking in North America, the Caribbean and South America.
     
    LOL, that's another thing I 've always wondered, why these guys are "Pan-European" when it's convenient.

    E.g.: When they see an African in a documentary on Spain:

    "Uuugh, those damn Knee-grows are ruining Europe!!!"

    But, when talking about the slave trade:

    "Hey, it was those nasteee, EEEVIL Spaniards and Portuguese that got most of the slaves, I'm German, ain't got nothin to do with me."
    , @Yojimbo/Zatoichi
    Ok, then get in line for reparations. Lord knows you and your kind deserve it for having ancestor(s) who were once enslaved. Go ahead. Apply for reparations for hundreds of yrs of slavery since the price paid to blacks hasn't been paid in full as of 2017.

    Go ahead.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.