The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / By Peter Brimelow
 All Comments / By Peter Brimelow
    VDARE.com editor Peter Brimelow spoke at the American Renaissance conference recently, which went off largely without incident due to the willingness of the Tennessee Park Police to enforce the law. See video below: I’ve been away from my cellphone for about two-three minutes coming up to the podium, so can someone tell me—what he done...
  • Sonia Sotomayor is not shy about saying, “the court of appeals is where policy is made.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Very true & significant statement of Peter Brimelow above, pointing to one of the most important but little-known & quite neglected parts of the much-non-honoured USA Constitution

    demystifying impeachment is a great idea. There ought to be a lot more impeachments, not fewer impeachments. It’s a way for the democratic process to get control of the judicial branch, which has become intolerable.

    The impression / illusion of most people, is that the USA Supreme Court is that nation’s highest body, but the Constitution makes clear that is utterly not true. What is ‘supreme’ above all per the USA Constitution, is the Congress, which has unlimited & unrestricted power to remove any & all USA federal (national) judges, even the Supreme Court, merely for lack of “good behaviour”, with impeachment by the House & then trial & non-appealable conviction by the US Senate.

    In other words no criminal offence needs to be proven or even argued … all the US House & Senate need to impeach a judge, is their opinion that the judge is behaving badly, e.g., issuing rubbish opinions in violation of the public interest.

    However, this power to impeach judges is almost never used, and less than a score of judges have been removed in the two and a quarter centuries the US Constitution has supposedly been in effect. The USA ’3 branches of government checks & balances’ has proven to be a grand oligarchic hoax, given that oligarchs can buy up 2 or all 3 branches of the government as easily as they can buy 1.

    Technically, the Chairman of the US House Judiciary Committee, should be one of the most feared august personages in the land. And indeed the House Judiciary Committee, receives reams of documents giving evidence of bribery, extortion, court fraud, & quite serious “bad behaviour” by US federal judges, according to reports by US judicial corruption activists.

    Amongst early founders of the USA, as the Constitution was being written & enacted, some of the ‘founding fathers’ warned that the ‘check & balance’ system was too weak, & would end up in judicial tyranny, with the US Supreme Court aggrandising to itself the power to ‘interpret’ the Constitution. The only real check & balance left, was that of secession, sadly not enshrined in the Constitution itself, an error leading to over 600,000 dead in 1861-65.

    There is a story on the web that when Barack Obama was elected, one of the people fooled by the ‘great reformer Obama’ myth, was black Congressman John Conyers of Detroit, head of the USA House Judiciary Committee & the proprietor of thousands of pages of files on US federal judge misconduct, some of the files dealing with the jailing of quite clearly innocent black people. It is said that Conyers planned for extensive hearings on US judge corruption after Obama’s inauguration.

    As Obama consolidated his 2008 victory, Conyers’ wife was arrested & jailed on a corruption charge, & allegedly Conyers was threatened to back off on the bent judges, as he would be dead if he pursued the matter, & that Conyers should see his wife going to prison for a while as a warning that he might be one more in the rather significant string of dead US Congressmen. Conyers did back off (if he had planned to do something), & nothing was heard from Obama or Conyers about the massive judicial corruption files there at the US Capitol.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • So I went to see this movie DUNKIRK at the urging of James Kirkpatrick, VDARE.com’s lead tweetmeister and our ambassador to popular culture. In the process, I made the interesting discovery that my young Texan wife had never heard of Dunkirk. For me, it brought flocking back a host of memories and emotions sternly repressed...
  • @Rev. Spooner
    Rubbish, tosh, racist crap. The American Landmass is usurped from the natives. The only way to justify it is to say "Might is right". You cannot justify it any other way. Once you agree to this, then you agree to the law of the jungle.
    The Europeans, after plundering the world and losing their colonies, discovered "Ethics". They loved their own rhetoric. After setting up the UN, they drafted laws that showed them as Noble and Enlightened people.
    But an Empire, any empire, has to be brutally honest.
    These hollow European claims are being challenged today by the reality of the refugee influx.
    The flood of refugees and the dissatisfaction of the populace
    The European politician still clings 'European values; while the general public is being dumbed down.
    The migrant population in France, UK, Holland etc., were initially imported to do jobs that the whites were unwilling to do. These people, along with a small minority like doctors, nurses and then IT coolies were all beneficial to the local economies.
    20 years went by without any mass migration with a steady and manageable immigrant stream.
    So what changed?
    Let me list the reasons. FUCKING AROUND IN PLACES YOU DON'T NEED TO.

    if your theory is correct, why don’t we see Mongolia invaded by swarms of refugees? After all, the Mongols had the greatest empire in world history. If it is were some natural consequences of ‘messing around’ in other cultures, they should be first on the invasion list.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Today’s leftists are proving Hitler to have been right. As Hitler warned, they DID want to destroy Western Civ. They’re doing it in the open now.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RobertTaylor
    How can anyone can look at what has happened to every White country in the West, against the will of the populations, and not see that these were truly genocidal policies.

    It is far too late for most countries like the UK.

    If members of the "Greatest Generation" had spoken out in the 50s and the 60s, this could have been avoided.

    Some (Enoch) did and were castigated and fired.

    A decade later (5 decades later wrt to Powell) what did we learn? This is where the PC political crowd has taken its citizens. Ditto the EU and ditto the US. Where to now given that there is nowhere for the PC crowd to hide?

    https://www.spectator.co.uk/2007/11/nigel-hastilows-real-crime-was-to-dare-to-mention-enoch-powell-at-all/#

    http://conservativehome.blogs.com/goldlist/2007/11/candidate-who-s.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    The British fought two wholly needless wars with the Germans only to turn around and give away their country through an unopposed invasion of black and brown aliens. I just do not get it.

    My own country, Canada, 98% white as recently as 1970, committed the same insanity....

    You can thank Pierre Trudeau for the decline of the European settlers of Canada. Before Trudeau, Canada had a fertility rate well above replacement, and a young dynamic population. Trudeau’s government voided the anti-abortion law and introduced no-fault divorce, with the result that, when Trudeau left office in 1984, Canada’s fertility rate was below replacement. Today, Canadians, with more room than citizens of any other country in the world have a fertility rate barely two-thirds the replacement rate.

    And to confirm the contempt of the Trudeau’s for Canadians, Trudeau the Second, recently informed the New York Times that Canada is a post-National state, without a core identity.

    And most recently, Trudeau II dissed Canadians again by telling immigrants they were more worthy of Canada than those born in Canada, immigrants having deliberately chosen to live in this wonderful land of the Trudeau’s, a land with no culture, no core, no loyalty of the ruling elite to the people, many of whose ancestors have worked and paid taxes in Canada and fought wars for Canada for generations.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "What’s dirty about hanging traitors intent on destroying your nation?"

    Nothing at all, except you are assuming that your countrymen who exercise their own freedom to enable non-English to enter the the country are traitors, and that these immigrants are hell bent on destroying everything in its path.

    "And where’s the basis for pretending I want someone else to do the hanging."

    If merry ol' England is being overrun by "invaders", and all you do is lament that nothing is being done about the situation, then you directly contributing to the demise of your nation. You demand others get involved to stop this trend cold in it tracks, but do not take the proper steps yourself to be on the front lines.

    "Now the common man of England sees his posterity destroyed, his job taken by an Asian or African or Middle-Easter coolie with no roots, no concept of rights, and long experience of, and submission to, a corrupt and tyrannical ruling class."

    Some common men.

    "All the while, the process of genocide is pushed forward by government and educational bureaucracies, and by the police, whileit is cheered on by cucks, ruling class traitors, the media and people like Corvinus."

    You are hyperventilating again. There is no "genocide" taking place. Again, if you feel so strongly about your nation being "invaded", why are you not physically doing something about it?

    If merry ol’ England is being overrun by “invaders”, and all you do is lament that nothing is being done about the situation, then you directly contributing to the demise of your nation.

    Listen Corvinus, you want me to do something? Here’s what I’ll do. If I ever come across you in person, I knock you down as a reminder to other cucks, traitors, saboteurs, and agitators for European genocide just how most Europeans feel about such scum. OK?

    Read More
    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Avery
    {... without horses even (the Armenians having eaten them, I suppose)).}

    I already addressed your misdiagnosis in an another thread*, Dr. Bovine, M.D.
    But apparently there is too much cud between your horns, so you have difficulty remembering things. I will reproduce my analysis of your misdiagnosis here - for the benefit of unz.com readers:

    140. [{…I guess the Armenians ate them.}
    Nope, Dr. Bovine M.D.: your diagnosis is wrong. Again.
    Armenians don’t eat horses.
    We eat sheeps, beefs, chickens, turkeys, and sometimes pigs.
    It’s youse barn dwelling cannibalistic Schweinhunden who eat each other.]


    When you stop hurling insults and behave, I might _try_ to enlighten youse, although it would be quite a challenge given the bovine nature of the target of the would be effort.

    _____
    *
    #140
    http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/americas-militarized-police/#new_comments

    OK, thanks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • On the score-keeping front, let’s not forget, Russia was defeated in WW1.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @David In TN
    It was supposedly Samuel Johnson, not Talleyrand, who said "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."

    Hence my asking–thanks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @mp
    @eys: during colonial times the locals working in colonial offices would have to kneel and wait for all their colonial masters to leave...

    In traditional cultures, this is pretty much the norm. One always showed respect for those above, including one's family elders. Of course, in the case you cite, this rite was imposed from the outside, by the colonialists, and thus quite artificial and inorganic to the indigenous culture.

    In a meeting with senior executives at a major financial institution in Thailand in the early 2000s, my New York colleagues and I we were served coffee by a young assistant. She shuffled into the room on her knees, set out the cups and coffee pot and shuffled out again, never standing up. No one seemed to think this was unusual.

    It was all very “The King and I”. And it was a local custom. I expect the British were simply continuing a local custom in Singapore.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    Sure, why not. I notice you are quite proud of Armenian military might (you even showed a video of artillery pieces being moved down a city street, without horses even (the Armenians having eaten them, I suppose)). I just found it interesting that you had no example of this prowess against the Turks, only in the service of the SU. So sure, enlighten me further.

    {… without horses even (the Armenians having eaten them, I suppose)).}

    I already addressed your misdiagnosis in an another thread*, Dr. Bovine, M.D.
    But apparently there is too much cud between your horns, so you have difficulty remembering things. I will reproduce my analysis of your misdiagnosis here – for the benefit of unz.com readers:

    140. [{…I guess the Armenians ate them.}
    Nope, Dr. Bovine M.D.: your diagnosis is wrong. Again.
    Armenians don’t eat horses.
    We eat sheeps, beefs, chickens, turkeys, and sometimes pigs.
    It’s youse barn dwelling cannibalistic Schweinhunden who eat each other.]

    When you stop hurling insults and behave, I might _try_ to enlighten youse, although it would be quite a challenge given the bovine nature of the target of the would be effort.

    _____
    *
    #140

    http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/americas-militarized-police/#new_comments

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    OK, thanks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ThreeCranes
    "Defeating Japanese was a small pickle by comparison to what was going on in the West."

    Horsefeathers.

    It was only a "small pickle" because we so ingeniously island hopped over their fortified bases and isolated them, thereby minimizing the number of human lives we lost. If that is your metric, then sorry we used a "tuning fork" (Nietzsche) when you would have used a sledge hammer.

    Agree.

    Imperial Japan was not Nazi Germany*, but was a formidable adversary.
    People forget that they had conquered much of Asia and subjugated 10s and 10s of millions of people. Even Brits who happened to be in their way were routed (e.g. in Singapore)

    They had an excellent navy, and brave fighting men, bordering on fanatical.
    Their Zero was a very good fighter and Japanese pilots were highly skilled.
    Imperial Japanese put up a hell of a fight and fought to the bitter end.
    They were no pushovers.

    But Americans fought smarter and gradually bled them and destroyed their ability to resist.
    Japanese navy never recovered from the loss of their carriers at Midway, a brilliant, carefully planned and executed US Navy operation.

    Give credit where credit is due.

    _______
    *
    e.g. they did not have the industrial capacity and access to resources like Germany.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Simply making the point that the SU was a multiethnic/multinational empire, it’s quite a stretch for Russians to claim it as their own (esp. given the disproportionate number of Jews in the original Bolshevik leadership).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Avery
    You haven't learned, have you?
    Do you enjoy being humiliated?
    Let me know if you want more, Dr. Bovine, M.D.

    Sure, why not. I notice you are quite proud of Armenian military might (you even showed a video of artillery pieces being moved down a city street, without horses even (the Armenians having eaten them, I suppose)). I just found it interesting that you had no example of this prowess against the Turks, only in the service of the SU. So sure, enlighten me further.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {... without horses even (the Armenians having eaten them, I suppose)).}

    I already addressed your misdiagnosis in an another thread*, Dr. Bovine, M.D.
    But apparently there is too much cud between your horns, so you have difficulty remembering things. I will reproduce my analysis of your misdiagnosis here - for the benefit of unz.com readers:

    140. [{…I guess the Armenians ate them.}
    Nope, Dr. Bovine M.D.: your diagnosis is wrong. Again.
    Armenians don’t eat horses.
    We eat sheeps, beefs, chickens, turkeys, and sometimes pigs.
    It’s youse barn dwelling cannibalistic Schweinhunden who eat each other.]


    When you stop hurling insults and behave, I might _try_ to enlighten youse, although it would be quite a challenge given the bovine nature of the target of the would be effort.

    _____
    *
    #140
    http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/americas-militarized-police/#new_comments

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @The True and Original David
    Russians comprised 66% of Soviet military casualties 1941-1945 per Krivosheev. The runner-up was Ukraine at about 15%. The rest of the nations in the "Union" put in roughly 1% each.

    I understand that Russia was ruled by a Georgian tyrant in this period, and so Russians were conscripted to fight for a polity that wasn't theirs and against their will (at least until the invasion). But no one can deny that the Russian people did more than their share of the fighting, the suffering, and the dying. Thus "Russia defeated Germany."

    I’m not disputing Soviet sacrifices and bravery during the war, and I have nothing but contempt for Americans and British who try to minimize or overlook the Soviet war effort. What I object to is Russian chauvinism that tries to co-opt the Soviet war effort as a Russian national achievement.

    Poles and Balts are absolute fools for allowing the Zio-American empire to use them as pawns to provoke Russia, but their distrust of Russia is understandable.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    Defeating Japanese was a small pickle by comparison to what was going on in the West. You can keep it all for yourself, just do not try to rewrite history in Europe. The destiny of the WW2 was decided on the eastern front.

    “Defeating Japanese was a small pickle by comparison to what was going on in the West.”

    Horsefeathers.

    It was only a “small pickle” because we so ingeniously island hopped over their fortified bases and isolated them, thereby minimizing the number of human lives we lost. If that is your metric, then sorry we used a “tuning fork” (Nietzsche) when you would have used a sledge hammer.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    Agree.

    Imperial Japan was not Nazi Germany*, but was a formidable adversary.
    People forget that they had conquered much of Asia and subjugated 10s and 10s of millions of people. Even Brits who happened to be in their way were routed (e.g. in Singapore)

    They had an excellent navy, and brave fighting men, bordering on fanatical.
    Their Zero was a very good fighter and Japanese pilots were highly skilled.
    Imperial Japanese put up a hell of a fight and fought to the bitter end.
    They were no pushovers.

    But Americans fought smarter and gradually bled them and destroyed their ability to resist.
    Japanese navy never recovered from the loss of their carriers at Midway, a brilliant, carefully planned and executed US Navy operation.

    Give credit where credit is due.

    _______
    *
    e.g. they did not have the industrial capacity and access to resources like Germany.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    Firstly you did not have those 6... But you were planning and getting ready, alas we made our own just in time. Regarding nice guys. IMHO you are as***s holes always were and always are. I never liked you and anything that USA represented.

    “IMHO you are as***s holes always were and always are. I never liked you and anything that USA represented.”

    But that’s not the point of my post really.

    What I implied was that the United States, with the power of a weapon the likes of which the world had never seen, could have gone on a rapacious acquisition spree by simply annexing any territory and exterminating any peoples it pleased. But it didn’t.

    I won’t argue that we’re really not “nice guys”. I’m was being a bit disingenuous. I know that we twist peoples arms and bomb them if they don’t comply.

    Nevertheless, it is a mystery why we with unlimited power at our fingertips exercised some restraint in expanding our empire. I believe that this is the key to understanding our current cuckdom. Two or three generations of American men have grown up in the knowledge that when push comes to shove they hold four Aces. The problem is that they have lost their aggressive instinct and grown complacent. They won’t for the life of them see the alien invasion of their own country as what it is. They still believe that they are untouchable. They can’t imagine that a threat from a minor country can harm them.

    And finally, you will never find me belittling the sacrifices made and losses suffered by the Russian people in WW2 nor would I ever gainsay their courage. The carnage on the Eastern European Front was terrible and the Soviet Union bore the brunt of and repulsed the Nazi attack.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wilkey
    "Plus, the film is a back-handed slap at Russia. Russia defeated Germany."

    Russia, eh? Russia was not a sovereign nation in 1940. It was part of the USSR. At that time it was allied with the Third Reich, and would continue to be allied with the Third Reich for another year, until Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa. If Stalin hadn't foolishly decapitated his military and allowed Mannerheim to utterly embarrass him in Finland then the Soviets might have remained Hitler's ally throughout the war.

    In short, the USSR got zero mention in "Dunkirk." So far as the Russians are concerned that was all for the better, because nothing that could have been said about them in a movie set entirely in a one week period in 1940 would have been nice.

    Russians comprised 66% of Soviet military casualties 1941-1945 per Krivosheev. The runner-up was Ukraine at about 15%. The rest of the nations in the “Union” put in roughly 1% each.

    I understand that Russia was ruled by a Georgian tyrant in this period, and so Russians were conscripted to fight for a polity that wasn’t theirs and against their will (at least until the invasion). But no one can deny that the Russian people did more than their share of the fighting, the suffering, and the dying. Thus “Russia defeated Germany.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    I'm not disputing Soviet sacrifices and bravery during the war, and I have nothing but contempt for Americans and British who try to minimize or overlook the Soviet war effort. What I object to is Russian chauvinism that tries to co-opt the Soviet war effort as a Russian national achievement.

    Poles and Balts are absolute fools for allowing the Zio-American empire to use them as pawns to provoke Russia, but their distrust of Russia is understandable.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    Kind of amazing the Armenians couldn't fight off the Turks, no?

    You haven’t learned, have you?
    Do you enjoy being humiliated?
    Let me know if you want more, Dr. Bovine, M.D.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Sure, why not. I notice you are quite proud of Armenian military might (you even showed a video of artillery pieces being moved down a city street, without horses even (the Armenians having eaten them, I suppose)). I just found it interesting that you had no example of this prowess against the Turks, only in the service of the SU. So sure, enlighten me further.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • And I’ll note there’s no dispute that Stalin was not Russian?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Avery
    {25% from Central Asia?}

    According to Karlin's blog*, Central Asian death toll was 3.62%.
    Slavic peoples, Russian+Ukrainian+Belorussians, 85.3%.
    Those percentages would be roughly equivalent to participation percentages.

    Aside from foot soldiers, the marshals, generals, officer corps were probably pretty much all ethnic Slavs. Certainly the most famous ones were, with a few from other republics.

    I know that aside from famous Marshal Bagramyan, there were other high ranking ethnic Armenian officers in WW2 Red Army.
    [Bagramyan was the first non-Slavic military officer to become a commander of a Front. He was among several Armenians in the Soviet Army who held the highest proportion of high-ranking officers in the Soviet military during the war.] (Wiki)

    _______
    *
    http://www.unz.com/akarlin/soviet-victory-was-russian/#comments

    Kind of amazing the Armenians couldn’t fight off the Turks, no?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    You haven't learned, have you?
    Do you enjoy being humiliated?
    Let me know if you want more, Dr. Bovine, M.D.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    25% from Central Asia? Could you provide your sources because Central Asians constituted tiny fraction at the time both in the army and in overall USSR population. They became more pronounced later probably because of terrible conditions all minorities suffered under Soviet power. At the time there was no difference between Russia, Belorussian and Ukrainian. Still, Russian contribution was a lion share which cannot be denied and is in causalities suffered...USSR by the way was just another name for Russia. As you might notice Ukrainians are not doing very well on their own and neither do others...

    I believe in Colossus Reborn Glantz claims 8M of the 34M mobilized were non-Slavic national minorities.

    Sure, Russians were the majority in the Red Army, so what? USSR was not Russia, that’s just jingoistic nonsense. And BTW, Khalkhin Gol does not negate the Japanese victory in the Russo-Japanese war.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    25% from Central Asia? Could you provide your sources because Central Asians constituted tiny fraction at the time both in the army and in overall USSR population. They became more pronounced later probably because of terrible conditions all minorities suffered under Soviet power. At the time there was no difference between Russia, Belorussian and Ukrainian. Still, Russian contribution was a lion share which cannot be denied and is in causalities suffered...USSR by the way was just another name for Russia. As you might notice Ukrainians are not doing very well on their own and neither do others...

    {25% from Central Asia?}

    According to Karlin’s blog*, Central Asian death toll was 3.62%.
    Slavic peoples, Russian+Ukrainian+Belorussians, 85.3%.
    Those percentages would be roughly equivalent to participation percentages.

    Aside from foot soldiers, the marshals, generals, officer corps were probably pretty much all ethnic Slavs. Certainly the most famous ones were, with a few from other republics.

    I know that aside from famous Marshal Bagramyan, there were other high ranking ethnic Armenian officers in WW2 Red Army.
    [Bagramyan was the first non-Slavic military officer to become a commander of a Front. He was among several Armenians in the Soviet Army who held the highest proportion of high-ranking officers in the Soviet military during the war.] (Wiki)

    _______
    *

    http://www.unz.com/akarlin/soviet-victory-was-russian/#comments

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Kind of amazing the Armenians couldn't fight off the Turks, no?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ThreeCranes
    You do remember that the United States not only soundly defeated the Japanese in the greatest sea war ever but put an exclamation point on that victory by dropping two nuclear bombs upon their cities?

    Had we wanted to we could have dropped six more on the Soviet Union and crushed you. Likely, you would not have been born. We could, had we wanted to, left the Soviet Union a smoking ruin.

    But we didn't.

    Why not?

    Because we're nice guys.

    To this day, we're too nice.

    If I were ruler of America, I would send troops and transports to the Bahamas and load up the locals and ship them to Africa. Why? Because its a nice place and I want U.S. citizens to live there. Same with Baja Mexico. All you locals, get out. We want your territory. Adios. Back to the mainland.

    And what could the Bahamas or Mexico do? Nothing.

    Once the United States decided to intervene in countries on the far side of the globe instead of expanding locally, they lost their initiative, their Spirit. We should have left the Koreans and Vietnamese alone and annexed desirable territory for our population to expand into. Anyone doesn't like it? Tough beans. We're bigger and tougher than you and I don't care about Might making Right, I just like the climate.

    We’re nice guys? I thought we were sociopaths protesting our innocence.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Typical hollywood garbage and FAKE HISTORY. Facts are that Hitler ordered a Halt and to allow the evacuation in hopes that Churchill would see it as a gesture of good faith and stop hostilities. If hitler was out to take over the world why didnt he capture the lot and leave England defenseless. Cant have the truth exposed since it would ruin the Germans are bad lies built up over years. FAKE NEWS FAKE HISTORY FAKE REALITY brought to you by the usual suspects.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ThreeCranes
    You do remember that the United States not only soundly defeated the Japanese in the greatest sea war ever but put an exclamation point on that victory by dropping two nuclear bombs upon their cities?

    Had we wanted to we could have dropped six more on the Soviet Union and crushed you. Likely, you would not have been born. We could, had we wanted to, left the Soviet Union a smoking ruin.

    But we didn't.

    Why not?

    Because we're nice guys.

    To this day, we're too nice.

    If I were ruler of America, I would send troops and transports to the Bahamas and load up the locals and ship them to Africa. Why? Because its a nice place and I want U.S. citizens to live there. Same with Baja Mexico. All you locals, get out. We want your territory. Adios. Back to the mainland.

    And what could the Bahamas or Mexico do? Nothing.

    Once the United States decided to intervene in countries on the far side of the globe instead of expanding locally, they lost their initiative, their Spirit. We should have left the Koreans and Vietnamese alone and annexed desirable territory for our population to expand into. Anyone doesn't like it? Tough beans. We're bigger and tougher than you and I don't care about Might making Right, I just like the climate.

    Defeating Japanese was a small pickle by comparison to what was going on in the West. You can keep it all for yourself, just do not try to rewrite history in Europe. The destiny of the WW2 was decided on the eastern front.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    "Defeating Japanese was a small pickle by comparison to what was going on in the West."

    Horsefeathers.

    It was only a "small pickle" because we so ingeniously island hopped over their fortified bases and isolated them, thereby minimizing the number of human lives we lost. If that is your metric, then sorry we used a "tuning fork" (Nietzsche) when you would have used a sledge hammer.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ThreeCranes
    You do remember that the United States not only soundly defeated the Japanese in the greatest sea war ever but put an exclamation point on that victory by dropping two nuclear bombs upon their cities?

    Had we wanted to we could have dropped six more on the Soviet Union and crushed you. Likely, you would not have been born. We could, had we wanted to, left the Soviet Union a smoking ruin.

    But we didn't.

    Why not?

    Because we're nice guys.

    To this day, we're too nice.

    If I were ruler of America, I would send troops and transports to the Bahamas and load up the locals and ship them to Africa. Why? Because its a nice place and I want U.S. citizens to live there. Same with Baja Mexico. All you locals, get out. We want your territory. Adios. Back to the mainland.

    And what could the Bahamas or Mexico do? Nothing.

    Once the United States decided to intervene in countries on the far side of the globe instead of expanding locally, they lost their initiative, their Spirit. We should have left the Koreans and Vietnamese alone and annexed desirable territory for our population to expand into. Anyone doesn't like it? Tough beans. We're bigger and tougher than you and I don't care about Might making Right, I just like the climate.

    Firstly you did not have those 6… But you were planning and getting ready, alas we made our own just in time. Regarding nice guys. IMHO you are as***s holes always were and always are. I never liked you and anything that USA represented.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    "IMHO you are as***s holes always were and always are. I never liked you and anything that USA represented."

    But that's not the point of my post really.

    What I implied was that the United States, with the power of a weapon the likes of which the world had never seen, could have gone on a rapacious acquisition spree by simply annexing any territory and exterminating any peoples it pleased. But it didn't.

    I won't argue that we're really not "nice guys". I'm was being a bit disingenuous. I know that we twist peoples arms and bomb them if they don't comply.

    Nevertheless, it is a mystery why we with unlimited power at our fingertips exercised some restraint in expanding our empire. I believe that this is the key to understanding our current cuckdom. Two or three generations of American men have grown up in the knowledge that when push comes to shove they hold four Aces. The problem is that they have lost their aggressive instinct and grown complacent. They won't for the life of them see the alien invasion of their own country as what it is. They still believe that they are untouchable. They can't imagine that a threat from a minor country can harm them.

    And finally, you will never find me belittling the sacrifices made and losses suffered by the Russian people in WW2 nor would I ever gainsay their courage. The carnage on the Eastern European Front was terrible and the Soviet Union bore the brunt of and repulsed the Nazi attack.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    Russian chauvinism over WW2 is rather amusing, given that the Soviet leader was Georgian and the Red Army was comprised of about 25% from the central Asians republics. (And course there were many Ukrainians as well.)

    25% from Central Asia? Could you provide your sources because Central Asians constituted tiny fraction at the time both in the army and in overall USSR population. They became more pronounced later probably because of terrible conditions all minorities suffered under Soviet power. At the time there was no difference between Russia, Belorussian and Ukrainian. Still, Russian contribution was a lion share which cannot be denied and is in causalities suffered…USSR by the way was just another name for Russia. As you might notice Ukrainians are not doing very well on their own and neither do others…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {25% from Central Asia?}

    According to Karlin's blog*, Central Asian death toll was 3.62%.
    Slavic peoples, Russian+Ukrainian+Belorussians, 85.3%.
    Those percentages would be roughly equivalent to participation percentages.

    Aside from foot soldiers, the marshals, generals, officer corps were probably pretty much all ethnic Slavs. Certainly the most famous ones were, with a few from other republics.

    I know that aside from famous Marshal Bagramyan, there were other high ranking ethnic Armenian officers in WW2 Red Army.
    [Bagramyan was the first non-Slavic military officer to become a commander of a Front. He was among several Armenians in the Soviet Army who held the highest proportion of high-ranking officers in the Soviet military during the war.] (Wiki)

    _______
    *
    http://www.unz.com/akarlin/soviet-victory-was-russian/#comments
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    I believe in Colossus Reborn Glantz claims 8M of the 34M mobilized were non-Slavic national minorities.

    Sure, Russians were the majority in the Red Army, so what? USSR was not Russia, that's just jingoistic nonsense. And BTW, Khalkhin Gol does not negate the Japanese victory in the Russo-Japanese war.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS
    Whoah........................

    Now, this is a dangerous comment.
    I am actually curious how it passed "the control".

    Simplified to the bones, but, man.........

    First paragraph, what to say?
    Second paragraph/sentence, well....up to a point really.
    Now, the third paragraph, well.........that could be something to debate.
    But...haha...I am quite sure we can't do it here.

    Actually, Mr ThreeCranes I am rather positive that you just got in The Database.

    Or....hehe...perhaps...you are part of the crew managing The Database.

    The history of revolutions is inherently fascinating.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ThreeCranes
    Today, no revolution can succeed without the use of shoulder fired missiles or rocket propelled grenades. For a first-world subject people to successfully shrug off the yoke of an occupying, alien class it would have to attack at the most vulnerable point and that is helicopter and limousine commutes into the cities that are home to its nerve center, the great banks and corporate headquarters.

    In Afghanistan, the shoulder fired missile was the game changer against the Russkies.

    Such an assault would force the alien Elite to retaliate by bombing pockets of resistance. This would provoke the general population to such a pitch of fury that they would rally behind a charismatic leader who would organize the people into a militia and they would drive out the invader/occupier. This has been the blueprint for all successful revolutions.

    Whoah……………………

    Now, this is a dangerous comment.
    I am actually curious how it passed “the control”.

    Simplified to the bones, but, man………

    First paragraph, what to say?
    Second paragraph/sentence, well….up to a point really.
    Now, the third paragraph, well………that could be something to debate.
    But…haha…I am quite sure we can’t do it here.

    Actually, Mr ThreeCranes I am rather positive that you just got in The Database.

    Or….hehe…perhaps…you are part of the crew managing The Database.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mobi
    The history of revolutions is inherently fascinating.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wally
    What a load of baseless Zionist propaganda recited like a parrot, or more than likely by another lying Zionist.
    Reads like something from the creepy supremacist Jew, Martin Gilbert.

    Of course you can't back up any of it, History Channel for you all the way.

    "Some stories are true that never happened."
    - Elie Wiesel

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com


    "One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one."
    - endorsed by 34 "reputable historians" and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979

    “Ach,” he said, “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”
    - "holocaust historian" Raul Hilberg, from https://youtu.be/2q51wqEE1fM
     

    What a load of baseless Zionist propaganda recited like a parrot, or more than likely by another lying Zionist.

    Oh man….you really do NOT know how to read people here.

    Whatever the man has said in this thread is either correct or, at least, calls for a decent conversation about.

    For example, trying to explore further his claim that there has been hatred towards Slavic peoples, throughout modern history, could be beneficial for common future.

    There is something……dark and deep….at work here when watching all this “Russia this” and “Russia that”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    Russia had serfs.
    China had slaves.

    So, why don't they have race problems like the US?

    Because Russian serfs were Russian and Chinese slaves were Chinese. So, when the system was eradicated, the once-serfs or once-slaves could be like everyone else.

    In contrast, the slaves were black in America. So, when black slaves were freed, they were no longer slaves but still black, and THAT was the problem. Slavery or no slavery, blacks remained stronger, more muscular, more aggressive, more psychopathic, louder, booty-shaking, and bigger-donged.
    In a way, end of slavery caused more problems for whites since stronger and more aggressive blacks could now run free and kick the white boy's ass and get white girls.

    Blackness, not slavery, was the main problem. We see this in EU and Australia today. These blacks come as free men but they act much like crazy American blacks. Why? They are black.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Mol

    Mol tried to turn Poland into Moland by sticking his dong into jungle-feverized Polish womenfolk. Polish women are known to be skanks.

    Suppose whites had enslaved other whites in America. Or the Chinese. Once freed, white ex-slaves would have melded in with other whites. Once freed, ex-slave Chinese would have looked up to bigger stronger whites and tried to fit in, like Mexican peasants used to saying 'si, senor'.

    Even if 400,000 blacks had been brought over as free people, they would have caused the same problems in the US.
    Because blacks were slaves in the US, we have this fallacy that slavery caused all the problem. But if we hypothetically change the race of the slaves, and we see it isn't so.

    No, the real problem was whites brought stronger, meaner, and more psychopathic black savages to the New World.

    You are correct. Part of the problem is that the slaves that were imported were not “the best and brightest”, but were the conquests of the various tribal wars and the low IQ criminals and ne’er do-wells that the village chieftains wanted to get rid of (and be rid of) anyway.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Saw it, and the film is an artwork far more than chronicle or myth. There is no unifying ethos. If
    you did not know the history, this could have a disaster movie of any culture. There is absolutely no aristocratic or Churchillian-bullddog flavor. The musical score is a prolonged cliche and embarrassment. Good for the acting portrayals of Kenneth Branagh, Cillian Murphy, Anthony Roylance, and the myriads who played Tommies and navees. Very good for shipboard and aerial action scenes. For myths I’ll stick to Olivier.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Small brained Basque britian needs superior genes of dark peoples otherwise u are going extinct because of your horrible immune system.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Russian chauvinism over WW2 is rather amusing, given that the Soviet leader was Georgian and the Red Army was comprised of about 25% from the central Asians republics. (And course there were many Ukrainians as well.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    25% from Central Asia? Could you provide your sources because Central Asians constituted tiny fraction at the time both in the army and in overall USSR population. They became more pronounced later probably because of terrible conditions all minorities suffered under Soviet power. At the time there was no difference between Russia, Belorussian and Ukrainian. Still, Russian contribution was a lion share which cannot be denied and is in causalities suffered...USSR by the way was just another name for Russia. As you might notice Ukrainians are not doing very well on their own and neither do others...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    Really? While Russo Japanese war was obvious defeat this is not so in case of the war in Afghanistan:

    "3. The USSR suffered a massive military defeat in Afghanistan at the hands of the mujahideen

    This is one of the most persistent myths of Afghan history. It has been trumpeted by every former mujahideen leader, from Osama bin Laden and Taliban commanders to the warlords in the current Afghan government. It is also accepted unthinkingly as part of the western narrative of the war. Some western politicians go so far as to say that the alleged Soviet defeat in Afghanistan helped to cause the collapse of the Soviet Union itself. On this they agree with Bin Laden and al-Qaida's other leaders, who claim they destroyed one superpower and are on their way to destroying another.

    The reality is the Afghan mujahideen did not defeat the Soviets on the battlefield. They won some important encounters, notably in the Panjshir valley, but lost others. In sum, neither side defeated the other. The Soviets could have remained in Afghanistan for several more years but they decided to leave when Gorbachev calculated that the war had become a stalemate and was no longer worth the high price in men, money and international prestige. In private, US officials came to the same conclusion about Soviet strength, although they only admitted it publicly later. Morton Abramowitz, who directed the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research at the time, said in 1997: "In 1985, there was a real concern that the [mujahideen] were losing, that they were sort of being diminished, falling apart. Losses were high and their impact on the Soviets was not great.""

    On the other hand we are witnessing yet another defeat of Anglo Saxons against same enemy with mujaheddin this time doing this without any assistance from anyone. Pathetic.

    Among recent Russian victories you fail to notice Georgia, Syria and yes Ukraine... Russia has been achieving her goals while Anglo Saxons side have not. Track record for your information is overall collection of results over long term hence one loss is not everything unless it is Germans circa WW2 loss which ends the whole track record for good. Russia has never suffered such a defeat.

    Your obnoxious chest-thumping here is really no different from Americans crowing about they weren’t “really” defeated in Vietnam.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thomas O. Meehan
    Not true. Hitler was attempting to avoid war with the US until Japan declared war on the US. There is this curious thing about Hitler. For all the lies and deceit, he had this trait of supporting his allies, even silly ones like Italy. It sounds crazy, but Hitler felt obliged to declare war on the US out of his commitment to the Axis pact with Japan. Cost him the war.

    His pact with Japan only required him to declare war on the US if the US initiated hostilities, which, regardless of the clear American provocations against Japan (and against Germany), was not the case with Pearl Harbor. Hitler’s declaration of war on the US remains baffling me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @NoseytheDuke
    You do know of course that the material support was deliberately withheld for as long as possible in order to "bleed" the USSR?

    FDR’s top aide, Harry Hopkins, went to Moscow and met with Stalin July 30-31, 1941. Hopkins promised almost unlimited aid. This was months before Pearl Harbor.

    By the way, how much assistance did Soviet Russia give Britain when they were standing alone against Hitler and being bombed day and night?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thomas O. Meehan
    Without western allied material help, the USSR would have lost and lost badly. Soviet troops rode to battle on Studebaker trucks, running on American gas, while stuffing themselves with Spam and breat made from American wheat. The Soviets couldn't even supply themselves with telephone wire. Soviet fighters flew on high octain aviation gas. The Soviet airforce was suplemented with fighters, bombers and transports from the West.

    Bear in mind that the Brits and the US fought both Germany/Italy etc. and the empire of Japan. The soviets only joined the fight when Japan was collapsing. Before that they were happy to have a nonaggression pact with the Japanese.

    The people of the Soviet Union were fighting for their lives against a regime every bit as evil as their own. But without our help they would have been destroyed. Keepm that in mind before you brag about the great Russian people.

    You do know of course that the material support was deliberately withheld for as long as possible in order to “bleed” the USSR?

    Read More
    • Replies: @David In TN
    FDR's top aide, Harry Hopkins, went to Moscow and met with Stalin July 30-31, 1941. Hopkins promised almost unlimited aid. This was months before Pearl Harbor.

    By the way, how much assistance did Soviet Russia give Britain when they were standing alone against Hitler and being bombed day and night?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    The British fought two wholly needless wars with the Germans only to turn around and give away their country through an unopposed invasion of black and brown aliens. I just do not get it.

    My own country, Canada, 98% white as recently as 1970, committed the same insanity....

    Australia too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    Russo Japanese war is a part of track record and I am not even going to argue.
    But WW2 Eastern Front is like 90% of all WW2 efforts. The rest did not matter. Regarding having to fight only Germans was thanks to Zhukov destroying Japanese in 1939 in the most decisive manner which led to signing non aggression pact with Japan... 1939 defeat of Japanese erased shame of Russo Japanese war defeat and Manchurian operation was something that US military was never capable of.
    You can watch it here:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTzLM6lInK0&list=PLfLzvgzsb9TifHZ7atjvqaLinfp1lfs3R&index=19

    You do remember that the United States not only soundly defeated the Japanese in the greatest sea war ever but put an exclamation point on that victory by dropping two nuclear bombs upon their cities?

    Had we wanted to we could have dropped six more on the Soviet Union and crushed you. Likely, you would not have been born. We could, had we wanted to, left the Soviet Union a smoking ruin.

    But we didn’t.

    Why not?

    Because we’re nice guys.

    To this day, we’re too nice.

    If I were ruler of America, I would send troops and transports to the Bahamas and load up the locals and ship them to Africa. Why? Because its a nice place and I want U.S. citizens to live there. Same with Baja Mexico. All you locals, get out. We want your territory. Adios. Back to the mainland.

    And what could the Bahamas or Mexico do? Nothing.

    Once the United States decided to intervene in countries on the far side of the globe instead of expanding locally, they lost their initiative, their Spirit. We should have left the Koreans and Vietnamese alone and annexed desirable territory for our population to expand into. Anyone doesn’t like it? Tough beans. We’re bigger and tougher than you and I don’t care about Might making Right, I just like the climate.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    Firstly you did not have those 6... But you were planning and getting ready, alas we made our own just in time. Regarding nice guys. IMHO you are as***s holes always were and always are. I never liked you and anything that USA represented.
    , @Sergey Krieger
    Defeating Japanese was a small pickle by comparison to what was going on in the West. You can keep it all for yourself, just do not try to rewrite history in Europe. The destiny of the WW2 was decided on the eastern front.
    , @Anon
    We're nice guys? I thought we were sociopaths protesting our innocence.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "Your mischaracterizing the situation. NOBODY ever voted for non-white immigration. Had it EVER been put to a vote in ANY white country it would have been annihilated at the voting booth."

    Actually, immigration has been put up to a vote...repeatedly. Not by citizens directly, of course, but by representatives in a legislature who were elected by citizens. Think next time, ok?

    Actually, immigration has been put up to a vote…repeatedly. Not by citizens directly, of course, but by representatives in a legislature who were elected by citizens.

    Neither political party opposes immigration. The Conservatives want it because it provides cheap labour for business. Labour wants it because they think the newcomers will vote for them, and because they want to be seen as anti-racist. In the UK, voting against the party line is a career-limiting move for an MP.

    It is hard to break this stranglehold on politics, especially when people tend to vote for the party that they think will deliver greater economic growth. Nigel Farage did so by making the Conservatives fear losing votes to UKIP – so they offered a referendum on EU membership to neutralise the threat.

    Opinion polls show a large majority of the public are against mass immigration; but it would take somebody as skilful as Farage to redirect government policy against it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @David In TN
    The Russo-Japanese war is part of "the track record." And why wasn't the Soviet army able to install Otto Kuusinen as head of a puppet government in Finland in December 1939?

    Speaking of WW II, the Soviet Union was the only major belligerent with only one front to fight on. The largest front to be sure, but advantageous compared to having major battle zones on air, land, and sea thousands of miles apart.

    Russo Japanese war is a part of track record and I am not even going to argue.
    But WW2 Eastern Front is like 90% of all WW2 efforts. The rest did not matter. Regarding having to fight only Germans was thanks to Zhukov destroying Japanese in 1939 in the most decisive manner which led to signing non aggression pact with Japan… 1939 defeat of Japanese erased shame of Russo Japanese war defeat and Manchurian operation was something that US military was never capable of.
    You can watch it here:

    Read More
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    You do remember that the United States not only soundly defeated the Japanese in the greatest sea war ever but put an exclamation point on that victory by dropping two nuclear bombs upon their cities?

    Had we wanted to we could have dropped six more on the Soviet Union and crushed you. Likely, you would not have been born. We could, had we wanted to, left the Soviet Union a smoking ruin.

    But we didn't.

    Why not?

    Because we're nice guys.

    To this day, we're too nice.

    If I were ruler of America, I would send troops and transports to the Bahamas and load up the locals and ship them to Africa. Why? Because its a nice place and I want U.S. citizens to live there. Same with Baja Mexico. All you locals, get out. We want your territory. Adios. Back to the mainland.

    And what could the Bahamas or Mexico do? Nothing.

    Once the United States decided to intervene in countries on the far side of the globe instead of expanding locally, they lost their initiative, their Spirit. We should have left the Koreans and Vietnamese alone and annexed desirable territory for our population to expand into. Anyone doesn't like it? Tough beans. We're bigger and tougher than you and I don't care about Might making Right, I just like the climate.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    Do you know what track record is ?

    Apparently not.

    I would, for example, include that ass-kicking you gave to the mujahedeen in Afghanistan in the 70's and 80's.

    Really? While Russo Japanese war was obvious defeat this is not so in case of the war in Afghanistan:

    “3. The USSR suffered a massive military defeat in Afghanistan at the hands of the mujahideen

    This is one of the most persistent myths of Afghan history. It has been trumpeted by every former mujahideen leader, from Osama bin Laden and Taliban commanders to the warlords in the current Afghan government. It is also accepted unthinkingly as part of the western narrative of the war. Some western politicians go so far as to say that the alleged Soviet defeat in Afghanistan helped to cause the collapse of the Soviet Union itself. On this they agree with Bin Laden and al-Qaida’s other leaders, who claim they destroyed one superpower and are on their way to destroying another.

    The reality is the Afghan mujahideen did not defeat the Soviets on the battlefield. They won some important encounters, notably in the Panjshir valley, but lost others. In sum, neither side defeated the other. The Soviets could have remained in Afghanistan for several more years but they decided to leave when Gorbachev calculated that the war had become a stalemate and was no longer worth the high price in men, money and international prestige. In private, US officials came to the same conclusion about Soviet strength, although they only admitted it publicly later. Morton Abramowitz, who directed the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research at the time, said in 1997: “In 1985, there was a real concern that the [mujahideen] were losing, that they were sort of being diminished, falling apart. Losses were high and their impact on the Soviets was not great.””

    On the other hand we are witnessing yet another defeat of Anglo Saxons against same enemy with mujaheddin this time doing this without any assistance from anyone. Pathetic.

    Among recent Russian victories you fail to notice Georgia, Syria and yes Ukraine… Russia has been achieving her goals while Anglo Saxons side have not. Track record for your information is overall collection of results over long term hence one loss is not everything unless it is Germans circa WW2 loss which ends the whole track record for good. Russia has never suffered such a defeat.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Your obnoxious chest-thumping here is really no different from Americans crowing about they weren't "really" defeated in Vietnam.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Philip Owen
    To repeat my comments on another thread, 30 destroyers and 3 battleships with guns of 20 mile range would have destroyed panzers in column before they reached the cover of the town. Germans had about 300 tanks, maybe 200 operational. They could have lost them all to naval gunfire. The BEF was too weak to attack the Germans and the Germans were too weak to attack the BEF on the ground. The British heavy tanks were not bad but there were hardly any of them.

    Now I've seen the film I can understand why it is not a vehicle for Brexiteer triumphalism. The main Army character is a deserter who teams up with a French deserter. He could have reported to the beach HQ and returned to his regiment, as my father-in-law's company did. Instead he tries to queue jump and board a hospital ship. Actual medical orderlies would have stayed with their regiments.

    Most of the army hid in the dunes where the bombing was ineffective. They stayed in regimental order until called. They expected the evacuation to succeed.

    Agreed. The German army was almost exhausted. Tanks broken down and fuel supply tenuous.

    Also, consider the outcome if Luftwaffe level bomber pilots had any real training bombing moving targets ie. shipping. A lot of footage exists of not-so-near misses on slow moving freighters. Stukas were another matter but they could not defend themselves against British fighters.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    No. USSR would not lose without so called lend lease. Firstly the whole help constituted mere 4% of what Soviet Union produced and invested in resources terms. Second, lend lease started arriving in any significant numbers at the end of 1943 when outcome of the war was no longer in question.soviet army broke Wermacht back by then all alone. What you are saying is just a feel good matra by the West to feel better. Without USSR involvement Britain would have been eventually overan. Without Western help and landing it would take a bit longer but the outcome would have been Soviet army at meditteranian beaches. Moscow, Stalingrad and Kursk three major battles that decided outcome of the WW2 in Europe too place before western help started arriving in large enough numbers and we'll before Normandy landing. Looks like "partners" wanted to be sure investment would not be in vain and joined in person when it was sure Germany lost the war and was weak enough to be easy picking. The goal was to prevent USSR sole gegemony over Europe which was deserved.

    You are making an excellent case for those who counseled against British alliance with the USSR. It would have been far wiser and moral to let the two retrograde powers bleed themselves into exhaustion. Germany strongly tends toward Western values and would have eventually returned to the fold. Russia as you demonstrate, is just too Asiatic to be a trustworthy partner in anything serious.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    No idea what this fuss is about. Brits were able to evacuate because Hitler still hoped to get along with them. Germans could get them all if an order were given. But it shows nicely how this machine works. Make some dramatic movies about even this shameful event in Britain history, ignore completely true great battles that turned the tide of war because those were fought by USSR and do it consistently over decades. And here we have what we have. Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Why is this a problem for you?

    Are you worried that the loons will bomb Moscow?

    You ain’t skeered are you?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The truly ironic thing about this is that both UK and Germany, victor and vanquished, are now meeting the same fate under globalism.

    So, even though UK beat Germany, UK came under US control. And as US came under Glob Control, UK and Germany also came under Glob Control.

    And Glob infected all three with Diversyphilis.
    So, it doesn’t matter if UK beat Germany. Both are now ideological, financial, and demographic colonies of the Glob that pushes Homomania, Jungle Fever, Cuckery, and Diversinoma as cancer.

    It’s like what does it matter which dog is top dog in the house when all dogs must obey the master?

    If UK were truly independent and sovereign, it could take pride in defeating Germany. As both UK and Germany are both dogs of the GLOB, it doesn’t matter.
    If anything, neither would be servants of the Glob if the Germans had won. German victory would have been horrible and evil in many ways, but it would have avoided certain other evils that now destroy Europe.

    This is too bad. After WWII, Europe had a second chance. It rebuilt fast, homogeneous nations were created and served as basis for peace. Also, the fact that all Europeans lost — French lost to Germany and even Brits were soon to lose empire — made them sympathize with one another and bury the hatchet.
    And even without empire, European conditions improved and people never had it so good.

    In the end, it wasn’t WWII and its horrors that did Europe in. It was the good times. Too much La Dolce Vita. After all, we see the same results in Sweden and Germany. (Same with Japan. It survived horrible WWII and made great strides afterwards. But it is now faced with gloom because Japanese are hedonistic and lost their way as shown in Kurosawa films.)

    Former-communist nations are less into this madness because they underwent much hardship under Soviets.

    Europeans still confuse nationalism with imperialism because Brits and French(and Nazis) associated nationalism with chauvinism and then imperialism. But for Poles, nationalism always meant recovery of their lost homeland under Russian and German imperialism. And for many Europeans, nationalism meant restoration of national independence from the Soviets. Estonians and Lithuanians only dreamed of national freedom. So, it is wrong to associate nationalism only with imperialism that trampled on other nationalisms(but also ironically ignited nationalism all over the world by spreading the Western political model to the non-West; after all, Indian and Indonesian nationalism are the products of Europeanism. Also, even in homogeneous Japan, an organic civilization, nationalism was a recent development as it requires the unity of elites and masses. In Old Japan, the people were just servants or slaves of the elites who regarded the masses as chattel.)

    Anyway, DUNKIRK is irrelevant because UK victory over Germans didn’t ensure any more pride or freedom for the Brits than for the Germans in the long run. If anything, both nations came under power of US finance, Afromania, homomania, and anti-white PC.

    In the end, the people of both UK and Germany were little more than gladiatorial warriors. No matter which side won, they were to fall under the the thumb of the glob emperor that was to own all.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Steve Naidamast
    If I remember correctly, Germany declared war on the US because the US was hunting down their ships though Hitler had ordered all German ships to not confront the US Navy...

    Not true. Hitler was attempting to avoid war with the US until Japan declared war on the US. There is this curious thing about Hitler. For all the lies and deceit, he had this trait of supporting his allies, even silly ones like Italy. It sounds crazy, but Hitler felt obliged to declare war on the US out of his commitment to the Axis pact with Japan. Cost him the war.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    His pact with Japan only required him to declare war on the US if the US initiated hostilities, which, regardless of the clear American provocations against Japan (and against Germany), was not the case with Pearl Harbor. Hitler's declaration of war on the US remains baffling me.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    Do you know what track record is ? Know of 1939 Halkin Gol and Manchurian operations? What wars against and peers uk and USA ever won on their own?

    Do you know what track record is ?

    Apparently not.

    I would, for example, include that ass-kicking you gave to the mujahedeen in Afghanistan in the 70′s and 80′s.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    Really? While Russo Japanese war was obvious defeat this is not so in case of the war in Afghanistan:

    "3. The USSR suffered a massive military defeat in Afghanistan at the hands of the mujahideen

    This is one of the most persistent myths of Afghan history. It has been trumpeted by every former mujahideen leader, from Osama bin Laden and Taliban commanders to the warlords in the current Afghan government. It is also accepted unthinkingly as part of the western narrative of the war. Some western politicians go so far as to say that the alleged Soviet defeat in Afghanistan helped to cause the collapse of the Soviet Union itself. On this they agree with Bin Laden and al-Qaida's other leaders, who claim they destroyed one superpower and are on their way to destroying another.

    The reality is the Afghan mujahideen did not defeat the Soviets on the battlefield. They won some important encounters, notably in the Panjshir valley, but lost others. In sum, neither side defeated the other. The Soviets could have remained in Afghanistan for several more years but they decided to leave when Gorbachev calculated that the war had become a stalemate and was no longer worth the high price in men, money and international prestige. In private, US officials came to the same conclusion about Soviet strength, although they only admitted it publicly later. Morton Abramowitz, who directed the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research at the time, said in 1997: "In 1985, there was a real concern that the [mujahideen] were losing, that they were sort of being diminished, falling apart. Losses were high and their impact on the Soviets was not great.""

    On the other hand we are witnessing yet another defeat of Anglo Saxons against same enemy with mujaheddin this time doing this without any assistance from anyone. Pathetic.

    Among recent Russian victories you fail to notice Georgia, Syria and yes Ukraine... Russia has been achieving her goals while Anglo Saxons side have not. Track record for your information is overall collection of results over long term hence one loss is not everything unless it is Germans circa WW2 loss which ends the whole track record for good. Russia has never suffered such a defeat.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @David In TN
    The Russo-Japanese war is part of "the track record." And why wasn't the Soviet army able to install Otto Kuusinen as head of a puppet government in Finland in December 1939?

    Speaking of WW II, the Soviet Union was the only major belligerent with only one front to fight on. The largest front to be sure, but advantageous compared to having major battle zones on air, land, and sea thousands of miles apart.

    The largest front to be sure

    Compared to one that originated in the Atlantic, then across Europe and the Mediterranean, down thru Africa, and spanning the entire Pacific Ocean?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    What do diversitards celebrate? There is no such thing as “Xenophobia”. Phobias are unfounded fears. Fearing invasions by aliens is a rational reaction to the Whole of Human History. But say that you want a border wall like Israel and the ADL will call for your arrest. Its easy to want to kill them isn’t it? Its not just the blatant hypocrisy, its the endless denial that there is even any hypocrisy.
    They see hate everywhere. Probably because they hate everything not them. Hard not to see hate in a World they hate huh? Diversitards and their fake caring parade that leads to more misery and ruin.
    Everything they say they care about. Clean water, clean air, low pollution, low population density, safe food, animal rights, womens’ equality, and even freedom. Sacrificed like a dumb animal to the moon gods of vibrant stupidity. The brown savages are so happy and joyful they always proclaim. No kidding. Ignorance is bliss. Its hard to worry when you are too dumb to plan for Tomorrow.
    China has enough pollution to blot out the sun during noon. Mexico is a magical land of narcoterrorist gangs, permanent income inequality and hardly any clean potable water at all. In Islam, women are practically livestock owned by men. But America and the West is what they want destroyed. See what tolerance brings? Locking up lunatics and jailing perverts doesn’t seem so bad now does it? These are the voters who bring rapists to rape your women.

    Read More
    • Agree: anarchyst
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • We often look for signs of recognition of (and reverence for) western cultural continuity from Hollywood, but it’s my opinion that it just isn’t there, not in any meaningful way. Over the last several years, I’ve seen columnists from the dissident right lift up the occasional movie like Dunkirk or movie makers like Nolan or Blomkamp or Clint Eastwood in an attempt to find a glimmer of hope from the entertainment industry, but I believe they are seeing what they want to see. It’s an illusion.

    Mel Gibson may be the one exception, but even he sometimes goes back and forth on positions that put him outside “polite” society in Hollywood. Sure, there may be conservative actors like Eastwood, Gary Sinise and Vince Vaughn, but their opinions don’t amount to much with regards to the output of the movie industry.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "That is not quite it. The Spanish and French, for example, have no history of labeling slaves sub-human or even inherently inferior and thus in need of superior Romance people’s conquering, so the Slavs allowed to survive can be serfs."

    Clearly you failed at world history. Spanish theologians Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda and Francisco López de Gómara each argued that Indians were brutes who were made to serve civilized peoples. The French during the colonial period tracked people’s racial heritage into 128 parts (which is six generations) based on a racial superiority model. Even someone who had 125–127 European parts was referred to as “mixed blood”.

    "Cultural and linguistic Germans have destroyed far more European cultures and languages than the rest of the world combined."

    Thank you very much for your opinion on this matter.

    The subject of mine that you quote is about Germanics damning non-Germanic whites as inferior, The subject is NOT about slavery. The auto-correct must have ‘corrected’ my word Slavs (probably not capitalized: slavs), and made it into ‘slaves.’

    Again, the subject is not slavery, including how any group of Europeans saw slavery in terms of non-whites. The subject that is essential to grasping how we came to be in this mess is that cultural/linguistic Germans (which group includes Anglo-Saxons) have a very long and violent history of hating non-Germanic whites.

    Everything, for example, that the NAZIs said about Jews they also said about Slavs. And the NAZIs took that ‘Slavs as subhuman’ talk from earlier Germans.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @David Davenport
    Their only concern in the West was keeping France and Britain off their backs so that they didn’t have to fight a two-front war when they launched Barbarossa, and this was largely accomplished between Dunkirk and D-Day.

    Indeed, Hitler wanted peace with the British once they were off the Continent… Rudolf Hess went on his secret flight to Britain to attempt to negotiate peace.


    Their only concern? Then why did "they" declare war on the USA ?

    If I remember correctly, Germany declared war on the US because the US was hunting down their ships though Hitler had ordered all German ships to not confront the US Navy…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomas O. Meehan
    Not true. Hitler was attempting to avoid war with the US until Japan declared war on the US. There is this curious thing about Hitler. For all the lies and deceit, he had this trait of supporting his allies, even silly ones like Italy. It sounds crazy, but Hitler felt obliged to declare war on the US out of his commitment to the Axis pact with Japan. Cost him the war.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    No idea what this fuss is about. Brits were able to evacuate because Hitler still hoped to get along with them. Germans could get them all if an order were given. But it shows nicely how this machine works. Make some dramatic movies about even this shameful event in Britain history, ignore completely true great battles that turned the tide of war because those were fought by USSR and do it consistently over decades. And here we have what we have. Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    Britain also was quite deceitful as to how they handled the Dunkirk evacuation. While evacuation proceeded they were telling the French that they were re-positioning their troops leaving the French completely on their own to defend the retreating British. French soldiers who fought alongside the retreating British and landed up on the beaches with them were nevertheless refused rescue until all British troops were rescued.

    Britain and Poland were primarily responsible for WWII with a lot of help from their friend, FDR who was illegally partaking in the war efforts by helping to supply Britain’s armaments programs.

    If you read the diplomatic histories of the inter-war period you get a completely different view of who was responsible for this atrocity but Western psychology will never allow that to presented in a rational and honest format to population or to students in school. You have to dig to find this information…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    Very Strange. The destruction of Great Britain. The very first white country to allow its 'voluntary' racial disintegration. And after being on the "winning" side of WW2. Very, very , very strange indeed. I have often wondered about this. Who EXACTLY passed the 1948 Commonwealth citizenship act? WHY didn't they realize what would happen?

    OR DID THEY.....???

    Large numbers of Commonwealth Citizens volunteered to fight with Britain including millions of Indians and many skilled West Indians in the RAF. The Commonwealth Citizenship act was a symbolic acknowledgement of that debt. And a continuous nation of the UK’s open Borders/ free trade/gold standard policy from before the 1929 crash. We are going that way again. Brexit means Brexit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    No. USSR would not lose without so called lend lease. Firstly the whole help constituted mere 4% of what Soviet Union produced and invested in resources terms. Second, lend lease started arriving in any significant numbers at the end of 1943 when outcome of the war was no longer in question.soviet army broke Wermacht back by then all alone. What you are saying is just a feel good matra by the West to feel better. Without USSR involvement Britain would have been eventually overan. Without Western help and landing it would take a bit longer but the outcome would have been Soviet army at meditteranian beaches. Moscow, Stalingrad and Kursk three major battles that decided outcome of the WW2 in Europe too place before western help started arriving in large enough numbers and we'll before Normandy landing. Looks like "partners" wanted to be sure investment would not be in vain and joined in person when it was sure Germany lost the war and was weak enough to be easy picking. The goal was to prevent USSR sole gegemony over Europe which was deserved.

    Forget Americans, there were British tanks defending Moscow by December 1941. The USSR received 3000 Hurricanes too. Not popular with Soviet pilots but very effective. This was not Lend Lease.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    No idea what this fuss is about. Brits were able to evacuate because Hitler still hoped to get along with them. Germans could get them all if an order were given. But it shows nicely how this machine works. Make some dramatic movies about even this shameful event in Britain history, ignore completely true great battles that turned the tide of war because those were fought by USSR and do it consistently over decades. And here we have what we have. Completely distorted history of WW2 in the West and ignorant public.

    To repeat my comments on another thread, 30 destroyers and 3 battleships with guns of 20 mile range would have destroyed panzers in column before they reached the cover of the town. Germans had about 300 tanks, maybe 200 operational. They could have lost them all to naval gunfire. The BEF was too weak to attack the Germans and the Germans were too weak to attack the BEF on the ground. The British heavy tanks were not bad but there were hardly any of them.

    Now I’ve seen the film I can understand why it is not a vehicle for Brexiteer triumphalism. The main Army character is a deserter who teams up with a French deserter. He could have reported to the beach HQ and returned to his regiment, as my father-in-law’s company did. Instead he tries to queue jump and board a hospital ship. Actual medical orderlies would have stayed with their regiments.

    Most of the army hid in the dunes where the bombing was ineffective. They stayed in regimental order until called. They expected the evacuation to succeed.

    Read More
    • Agree: iffen
    • Replies: @Thomas O. Meehan
    Agreed. The German army was almost exhausted. Tanks broken down and fuel supply tenuous.

    Also, consider the outcome if Luftwaffe level bomber pilots had any real training bombing moving targets ie. shipping. A lot of footage exists of not-so-near misses on slow moving freighters. Stukas were another matter but they could not defend themselves against British fighters.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    Very Strange. The destruction of Great Britain. The very first white country to allow its 'voluntary' racial disintegration. And after being on the "winning" side of WW2. Very, very , very strange indeed. I have often wondered about this. Who EXACTLY passed the 1948 Commonwealth citizenship act? WHY didn't they realize what would happen?

    OR DID THEY.....???

    The British fought two wholly needless wars with the Germans only to turn around and give away their country through an unopposed invasion of black and brown aliens. I just do not get it.

    They beat the Germans in military struggle.

    They lost to the Glob in financial and ideological struggle.

    UK and Canada, like the US, became occupied by the Left and then the Glob.

    Also, if the ‘finest hour’ of UK was defeating race-supremacist Nazis, then the UK had to purge everything ‘racist’ about it to live up the worthy title of victors over Germans.

    Also, there was Negro pop culture that Brits became addicted to. They grew tired of their own culture as repressive and boring. They felt liberated by black funk.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    We have this nonsense called gender studies but what we really need is sex studies. Sex is biological, gender is socially constructed. It's reality vs fantasy. Maybe, the elites promote genderology to distract us from the crucial facts of sexology.

    All white people are the products of white men planting seeds in white women. White women are like European soil. If you lose the land, you lose the place where you can build homes and plant food. It means death. Likewise, if white men lose access to white wombs, they lose the chance to make white life. For example, if any white man's mother had been womb-colonized by a Negro, he would been Afroborted and replaced by mulatto who will be seen as black. So, control of land and wombs are vital for racial survival. Blacks control all black wombs, and now, white wombs are coming under Afro-Colonization.

    Why? Because blacks are more muscular and more aggressive. They also have bigger dongs, a common trope in Pop Culture, even prime-time TV shows. Also, sports and music are related to sex. Female instinct wants to mate with top warriors, even if of another race that defeats her own race. Female instinct despises the loser, even of her own race. When whites integrate with blacks, blacks routinely kick white butt in schools, streets, and playing fields. Blacks command the ball, white girls play cheerleader for them. Look at Sports Illustrated. Top athletes are black, top bikini models are white.
    Also, music and sex affect same parts of the brain. As blacks have louder voices and more rhythm, they make more lustful music, and this turns white women into jungle women.

    Now, manhood is vital for male psychology, health, and survival. The fact is white manhood wilts and fades in the presence of blacks. White Manhood needs safe space from Black Thughood. White Manhood and Black Manhood cannot co-exist. When two come together, blacks are cocks, whites are cucks. It's like in prisons where black inmates routinely rape white boys as their 'bitches'.
    Milo, Andrew Sullivan, and other 'gay conservatives' are bitches to black homo dongs.

    So, why should white males welcome than resist the massive invasion of Europe by blacks. If a bunch of Vietnamese come to France, French manhood can lord over Viet manhood as Viet men are short and geeky. But when Sub-Saharan Africans arrive, French manhood goes down the toilet. Same in UK. What kind of man wants to lose his manhood in his own homeland and lose his women to Africans who conquer and colonize white wombs like Spanish conquered and colonized New World indigenous wombs and created the servile mestizo race that still lives under Hispanic rule?

    According to PC, Ideal White Fatherhood is welcoming black Africa invasion so that stronger blacks will beat up his sons and impregnate his daughters. Yes, white fathers should cheer the impregnation of his daughters' wombs by the same thugs who beat up his sons and destroyed their white manhood.

    What white man would want tougher blacks to beat up his son and impregnate his daughter? But PC says that is the IDEAL white parenting.

    We need sex studies about the real power and real survival. We don't need gender studies that distract us with fantasies and encourage white boys to seek 50 alternate genders of wussidom.

    Priss says;

    “White women are like European soil. If you lose the land, you lose the place where you can build homes and plant food. It means death. Likewise, if white men lose access to white wombs, they lose the chance to make white life. For example, if any white man’s mother had been womb-colonized by a Negro, he would been Afroborted and replaced by mulatto who will be seen as black. So, control of land and wombs are vital for racial survival. Blacks control all black wombs, and now, white wombs are coming under Afro-Colonization.”

    Righto.

    People say things like the following: “Because a male (cat, dog, Homo sapiens) can impregnate 100 (or 1000, whatever) females, it is imperative to castrate males rather than females. Besides, the operation of cutting off a male’s testicles is much less intrusive–and therefore less risky–than spaying the female. Therefore, CASTRATE MALES!”

    But they have it exactly bass ackwards. Precisely BECAUSE one male can impregnate 1000 females, it is relatively fruitless to castrate males if one intends to control population. What’s important, as Priss point out, is to regulate the number of wombs since their power to reproduce is so much lower.

    Say we castrate 999 males out of 1000. That one male can still impregnate 1000 females so to control population we need to focus on the womb and this means killing off females. Game wardens know this and that’s why states like Wisconsin, when they really need to thin down the deer, open the season to hunting does.

    This notion of murdering or rendering sterile the wombs of women runs deeply counter to European values. Women and children are protected under the general rules of civilized warfare. If you want to be instantly socially marginalized, just suggest that black welfare mothers should have to undergo mandatory sterilization after having had two children; that or give up their benefits. Almost all peoples, conservatives and liberals alike, will recoil in horror at this suggestion. They hold the right of a woman to determine the number of children she will have sacred. And yet common sense, science and math argue the opposite.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Dr. X

    The British held off an invasion by the Germans (close relatives in language, religion, history, and culture) only to be swallowed whole a few years later by an invasion from a basket of Third World peoples... A short stint of occupation by the Wehrmacht in WWII might have been preferable to this reality.
     
    The Germans were never going to invade Britain. Sure, they had plans drawn up -- Operation Sea Lion. But militaries draw up all sorts of contingency plans that have no practical chance of seeing the light of day.

    Practically speaking, Germany as a land power had no tactical ability to actually accomplish such an invasion. Strategically, it was unnecessary. The grand German strategy was to conquer Eastern Europe and the USSR. Their only concern in the West was keeping France and Britain off their backs so that they didn't have to fight a two-front war when they launched Barbarossa, and this was largely accomplished between Dunkirk and D-Day.

    Indeed, Hitler wanted peace with the British once they were off the Continent... Rudolf Hess went on his secret flight to Britain to attempt to negotiate peace.

    Finally, I think you're presenting a false choice between "a short stint" of German occupation vs. being overrun by Third Worlders. France experienced a short German occupation, but today they're allowing themselves to be inundated by Third World Arabs, Muslims, and blacks.

    Their only concern in the West was keeping France and Britain off their backs so that they didn’t have to fight a two-front war when they launched Barbarossa, and this was largely accomplished between Dunkirk and D-Day.

    Indeed, Hitler wanted peace with the British once they were off the Continent… Rudolf Hess went on his secret flight to Britain to attempt to negotiate peace.

    Their only concern? Then why did “they” declare war on the USA ?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Steve Naidamast
    If I remember correctly, Germany declared war on the US because the US was hunting down their ships though Hitler had ordered all German ships to not confront the US Navy...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    Do you know what track record is ? Know of 1939 Halkin Gol and Manchurian operations? What wars against and peers uk and USA ever won on their own?

    The Russo-Japanese war is part of “the track record.” And why wasn’t the Soviet army able to install Otto Kuusinen as head of a puppet government in Finland in December 1939?

    Speaking of WW II, the Soviet Union was the only major belligerent with only one front to fight on. The largest front to be sure, but advantageous compared to having major battle zones on air, land, and sea thousands of miles apart.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    The largest front to be sure

    Compared to one that originated in the Atlantic, then across Europe and the Mediterranean, down thru Africa, and spanning the entire Pacific Ocean?
    , @Sergey Krieger
    Russo Japanese war is a part of track record and I am not even going to argue.
    But WW2 Eastern Front is like 90% of all WW2 efforts. The rest did not matter. Regarding having to fight only Germans was thanks to Zhukov destroying Japanese in 1939 in the most decisive manner which led to signing non aggression pact with Japan... 1939 defeat of Japanese erased shame of Russo Japanese war defeat and Manchurian operation was something that US military was never capable of.
    You can watch it here:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTzLM6lInK0&list=PLfLzvgzsb9TifHZ7atjvqaLinfp1lfs3R&index=19
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @James N. Kennett

    For example, Spain is a moderately rich European country with a large agro industry and Spaniards are no longer willing to do the hard low paid work in the fields.
     
    The key words here are "low paid". Spain has high youth unemployment. Businesses prefer to bring in foreign workers than to increase wages to the point that unemployed people are willing to do the work.

    The same pattern is repeated throughout the Western world. It is impossible to live a decent life in London on minimum wage, because rents are so high. The problem is solved by bringing in foreign workers who are willing to live in overcrowded shared accommodation.

    Well-meaning people used to tell us that the poor were "left behind", and needed help to catch up with mainstream society. You don't hear that kind of talk so much now. When people succeed in escaping poverty, wealthy countries import poor people from other countries to take their place.

    The key words here are “low paid”. Spain has high youth unemployment. Businesses prefer to bring in foreign workers than to increase wages to the point that unemployed people are willing to do the work.

    In the 1950′s Spaniards were willing to do the work since almost everyone was poor, but it’s difficult to be poor when a lot of people in the large cities and along the coast are earning reasonable wages. There’s a move out of rural areas that has been going on for years with bad unemployment, but even this is not quite what it seems, with a big undercover economy and the standing joke about the unemployed living with their mothers (there’s some truth in it).

    Also agro wages are determined by very low wholesale produce prices. When oranges retail for 80c a kilo in Spanish supermarkets it’s near a point where the fruit is left to rot under the trees.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    We have this nonsense called gender studies but what we really need is sex studies. Sex is biological, gender is socially constructed. It's reality vs fantasy. Maybe, the elites promote genderology to distract us from the crucial facts of sexology.

    All white people are the products of white men planting seeds in white women. White women are like European soil. If you lose the land, you lose the place where you can build homes and plant food. It means death. Likewise, if white men lose access to white wombs, they lose the chance to make white life. For example, if any white man's mother had been womb-colonized by a Negro, he would been Afroborted and replaced by mulatto who will be seen as black. So, control of land and wombs are vital for racial survival. Blacks control all black wombs, and now, white wombs are coming under Afro-Colonization.

    Why? Because blacks are more muscular and more aggressive. They also have bigger dongs, a common trope in Pop Culture, even prime-time TV shows. Also, sports and music are related to sex. Female instinct wants to mate with top warriors, even if of another race that defeats her own race. Female instinct despises the loser, even of her own race. When whites integrate with blacks, blacks routinely kick white butt in schools, streets, and playing fields. Blacks command the ball, white girls play cheerleader for them. Look at Sports Illustrated. Top athletes are black, top bikini models are white.
    Also, music and sex affect same parts of the brain. As blacks have louder voices and more rhythm, they make more lustful music, and this turns white women into jungle women.

    Now, manhood is vital for male psychology, health, and survival. The fact is white manhood wilts and fades in the presence of blacks. White Manhood needs safe space from Black Thughood. White Manhood and Black Manhood cannot co-exist. When two come together, blacks are cocks, whites are cucks. It's like in prisons where black inmates routinely rape white boys as their 'bitches'.
    Milo, Andrew Sullivan, and other 'gay conservatives' are bitches to black homo dongs.

    So, why should white males welcome than resist the massive invasion of Europe by blacks. If a bunch of Vietnamese come to France, French manhood can lord over Viet manhood as Viet men are short and geeky. But when Sub-Saharan Africans arrive, French manhood goes down the toilet. Same in UK. What kind of man wants to lose his manhood in his own homeland and lose his women to Africans who conquer and colonize white wombs like Spanish conquered and colonized New World indigenous wombs and created the servile mestizo race that still lives under Hispanic rule?

    According to PC, Ideal White Fatherhood is welcoming black Africa invasion so that stronger blacks will beat up his sons and impregnate his daughters. Yes, white fathers should cheer the impregnation of his daughters' wombs by the same thugs who beat up his sons and destroyed their white manhood.

    What white man would want tougher blacks to beat up his son and impregnate his daughter? But PC says that is the IDEAL white parenting.

    We need sex studies about the real power and real survival. We don't need gender studies that distract us with fantasies and encourage white boys to seek 50 alternate genders of wussidom.

    That´s right. But one has to keep in mind that all the problems described are also true for the East Asian / Subsaharan relationship and also for Caucasian / East Asian relationship. I even have the impression that the “manlihood difference” between Subsaharan Africans and Caucasians is smaller than the difference between Caucasians and East Asians.
    The really unfair thing about all that is that East Asians and to a lesser degree Caucasians are not less manly without reason. Evolutionary mother nature traded one kind of manhood against for another. The latter could be briefly described as the foundation of civilization. So there are two ways of being manly: in terms of being a good boxer, having high bone density, high muscle tone, deep voices and a high image of yourself which leads to overall “swag” and sexual attractivity, the other way in terms of being self-restricted, being able to built up a home and wealth and feed a family. Both kinds of men have their way to make war: one by fighting physically with bare hands, the other by cooperation and the use of technology. Antiracism encourages one kind of violence (blacks beating up everybody else) but forbids the other kind of violence (which means cooperating to secure your home, family, borders), with the latter being called “racism”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thomas O. Meehan
    Without western allied material help, the USSR would have lost and lost badly. Soviet troops rode to battle on Studebaker trucks, running on American gas, while stuffing themselves with Spam and breat made from American wheat. The Soviets couldn't even supply themselves with telephone wire. Soviet fighters flew on high octain aviation gas. The Soviet airforce was suplemented with fighters, bombers and transports from the West.

    Bear in mind that the Brits and the US fought both Germany/Italy etc. and the empire of Japan. The soviets only joined the fight when Japan was collapsing. Before that they were happy to have a nonaggression pact with the Japanese.

    The people of the Soviet Union were fighting for their lives against a regime every bit as evil as their own. But without our help they would have been destroyed. Keepm that in mind before you brag about the great Russian people.

    No. USSR would not lose without so called lend lease. Firstly the whole help constituted mere 4% of what Soviet Union produced and invested in resources terms. Second, lend lease started arriving in any significant numbers at the end of 1943 when outcome of the war was no longer in question.soviet army broke Wermacht back by then all alone. What you are saying is just a feel good matra by the West to feel better. Without USSR involvement Britain would have been eventually overan. Without Western help and landing it would take a bit longer but the outcome would have been Soviet army at meditteranian beaches. Moscow, Stalingrad and Kursk three major battles that decided outcome of the WW2 in Europe too place before western help started arriving in large enough numbers and we’ll before Normandy landing. Looks like “partners” wanted to be sure investment would not be in vain and joined in person when it was sure Germany lost the war and was weak enough to be easy picking. The goal was to prevent USSR sole gegemony over Europe which was deserved.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Philip Owen
    Forget Americans, there were British tanks defending Moscow by December 1941. The USSR received 3000 Hurricanes too. Not popular with Soviet pilots but very effective. This was not Lend Lease.
    , @Thomas O. Meehan
    You are making an excellent case for those who counseled against British alliance with the USSR. It would have been far wiser and moral to let the two retrograde powers bleed themselves into exhaustion. Germany strongly tends toward Western values and would have eventually returned to the fold. Russia as you demonstrate, is just too Asiatic to be a trustworthy partner in anything serious.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    Your mischaracterizing the situation. NOBODY ever voted for non-white immigration. Had it EVER been put to a vote in ANY white country it would have been annihilated at the voting booth.

    “Your mischaracterizing the situation. NOBODY ever voted for non-white immigration. Had it EVER been put to a vote in ANY white country it would have been annihilated at the voting booth.”

    Actually, immigration has been put up to a vote…repeatedly. Not by citizens directly, of course, but by representatives in a legislature who were elected by citizens. Think next time, ok?

    Read More
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett

    Actually, immigration has been put up to a vote…repeatedly. Not by citizens directly, of course, but by representatives in a legislature who were elected by citizens.
     
    Neither political party opposes immigration. The Conservatives want it because it provides cheap labour for business. Labour wants it because they think the newcomers will vote for them, and because they want to be seen as anti-racist. In the UK, voting against the party line is a career-limiting move for an MP.

    It is hard to break this stranglehold on politics, especially when people tend to vote for the party that they think will deliver greater economic growth. Nigel Farage did so by making the Conservatives fear losing votes to UKIP - so they offered a referendum on EU membership to neutralise the threat.

    Opinion polls show a large majority of the public are against mass immigration; but it would take somebody as skilful as Farage to redirect government policy against it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jake
    "The problem is the same: Western Europeans seem to hate the white eastern Slavs."

    That is not quite it. The Spanish and French, for example, have no history of labeling slaves sub-human or even inherently inferior and thus in need of superior Romance people's conquering, so the Slavs allowed to survive can be serfs.

    Germans are the source. Germanic culture is the problem. Germans on the Continent want to force Slavs to be their permanent serf class. Anglo-Saxons (Angles and Saxons were German tribes) want the same for Celts. Cultural and linguistic Germans have destroyed far more European cultures and languages than the rest of the world combined.

    Add 'faith only' and 'once saved always saved' and Luther's intense hatred of all things Latin as somehow cheating poor innocent Germans, and you are certain to see Germanic onslaughts to destroy as much of European civilization as is required for Germans to hold the One Ring to rule them all.

    Oh yes - and Yiddish is German, just a Judaized dialect of German, for a reason, the same one that meant Oliver Cromwell would immediately jump into bed with Jews: Germanic culture and Jews mix easily and naturally.

    “That is not quite it. The Spanish and French, for example, have no history of labeling slaves sub-human or even inherently inferior and thus in need of superior Romance people’s conquering, so the Slavs allowed to survive can be serfs.”

    Clearly you failed at world history. Spanish theologians Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda and Francisco López de Gómara each argued that Indians were brutes who were made to serve civilized peoples. The French during the colonial period tracked people’s racial heritage into 128 parts (which is six generations) based on a racial superiority model. Even someone who had 125–127 European parts was referred to as “mixed blood”.

    “Cultural and linguistic Germans have destroyed far more European cultures and languages than the rest of the world combined.”

    Thank you very much for your opinion on this matter.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    The subject of mine that you quote is about Germanics damning non-Germanic whites as inferior, The subject is NOT about slavery. The auto-correct must have 'corrected' my word Slavs (probably not capitalized: slavs), and made it into 'slaves.'

    Again, the subject is not slavery, including how any group of Europeans saw slavery in terms of non-whites. The subject that is essential to grasping how we came to be in this mess is that cultural/linguistic Germans (which group includes Anglo-Saxons) have a very long and violent history of hating non-Germanic whites.

    Everything, for example, that the NAZIs said about Jews they also said about Slavs. And the NAZIs took that 'Slavs as subhuman' talk from earlier Germans.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Rurik

    So when a white female has her 1-3 children with a black male and than leaves him
     
    I wonder...

    I would (and have) slept with women who no doubt have a sundry assortment of liaisons, but what if they had a black kid, would that stop you fellas from dating them or even marrying them?

    would that bother you in the least? Would you be perfectly happy to take such a woman and her brood to meet your mother and hang out at the family reunion, perhaps as a feather in your cap that you're so open-minded?

    I see these guys who get married to women with brown children and just sort of wonder if it ever bothers these guys, (knowing that the sniggers behind their backs- especially from black men- will follow them their entire lives)

    https://heartiste.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/eu.jpeg?w=500&h=281

    strangely many men seem to accept such a situation, probably because the only other option is having no woman at all. I don´t even understand why many white men accept marriage with women who already have other white children.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Miro23

    I have no problem with immigrants of the proper sort. But their ought to be strict limits on what they can and can’t do, in my view. No immigrant should be granted full citizenship. Maybe after several generations their progeny could apply. I don’t know. An ethno state where citizens are tied to the land by clan, religion, and family is the best situation.
     
    The interesting point here is that immigration always seems to start as an economic story. Immigrants come because the US and Europe offer low paying jobs that the locals don't want to do. So the problem comes later when they get English, German, Swedish or American passports while they're not integrated in any real way.

    Some countries have a much better way of getting round this problem.

    For example, Spain is a moderately rich European country with a large agro industry and Spaniards are no longer willing to do the hard low paid work in the fields. Their solution is to offer temporary "foreign resident" status to immigrants, coupled to an obligation to make contributions to the national health insurance system. There's no question of voting rights or gaining citizenship although they are protected by Spanish law in the same way as as Spanish citizens.

    Further along the scale, a very rich country like Switzerland has many more types of lower level jobs that the Swiss are unwilling to do, so they have a correspondingly larger immigrant population. They give out time specific work contracts with the job already identified prior to the worker (not immigrant) arriving in the country. There's no question of the North African road repair men becoming Swiss nationals. And it works quite well with everyone knowing who they are and why they're there.

    For example, Spain is a moderately rich European country with a large agro industry and Spaniards are no longer willing to do the hard low paid work in the fields.

    The key words here are “low paid”. Spain has high youth unemployment. Businesses prefer to bring in foreign workers than to increase wages to the point that unemployed people are willing to do the work.

    The same pattern is repeated throughout the Western world. It is impossible to live a decent life in London on minimum wage, because rents are so high. The problem is solved by bringing in foreign workers who are willing to live in overcrowded shared accommodation.

    Well-meaning people used to tell us that the poor were “left behind”, and needed help to catch up with mainstream society. You don’t hear that kind of talk so much now. When people succeed in escaping poverty, wealthy countries import poor people from other countries to take their place.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    The key words here are “low paid”. Spain has high youth unemployment. Businesses prefer to bring in foreign workers than to increase wages to the point that unemployed people are willing to do the work.
     
    In the 1950's Spaniards were willing to do the work since almost everyone was poor, but it's difficult to be poor when a lot of people in the large cities and along the coast are earning reasonable wages. There's a move out of rural areas that has been going on for years with bad unemployment, but even this is not quite what it seems, with a big undercover economy and the standing joke about the unemployed living with their mothers (there's some truth in it).

    Also agro wages are determined by very low wholesale produce prices. When oranges retail for 80c a kilo in Spanish supermarkets it's near a point where the fruit is left to rot under the trees.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jake
    "The problem is the same: Western Europeans seem to hate the white eastern Slavs."

    That is not quite it. The Spanish and French, for example, have no history of labeling slaves sub-human or even inherently inferior and thus in need of superior Romance people's conquering, so the Slavs allowed to survive can be serfs.

    Germans are the source. Germanic culture is the problem. Germans on the Continent want to force Slavs to be their permanent serf class. Anglo-Saxons (Angles and Saxons were German tribes) want the same for Celts. Cultural and linguistic Germans have destroyed far more European cultures and languages than the rest of the world combined.

    Add 'faith only' and 'once saved always saved' and Luther's intense hatred of all things Latin as somehow cheating poor innocent Germans, and you are certain to see Germanic onslaughts to destroy as much of European civilization as is required for Germans to hold the One Ring to rule them all.

    Oh yes - and Yiddish is German, just a Judaized dialect of German, for a reason, the same one that meant Oliver Cromwell would immediately jump into bed with Jews: Germanic culture and Jews mix easily and naturally.

    There are certainly variances in the level of dislike or hatred, I agree that Italians or Spaniards are a lot less virulent. But the French with Macron “I have been hacked” are among the worst, there is something odd about the French, as if they had a form of mental VD, cocky and subservient, weak and aggressive. I can’t figure them out. But they always obediently mimic anglo, German, or even Scandinavian attitudes.

    We will not save the “West” like this. You can’t have a huge internal split, you need to choose. This is a bit like WWII. And I don’t see the current multi-cultural West dominated by aggressive uber-liberalism, and still displaying the old atavistic anti-east attitudes, I don’t see that changing. So it will be over for them in this century. They will disappear as a recognizable civilization. This is who-whom moment, although the moment will last a few decades. Whether the east follows and collapses too, I don’t know. They might, their internal confusion is quite bad. They might keep on taking the candy from the West and willingly go down with it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @mp
    What pieces of legislation “tells” Americans they must marry foreigners?

    None, of course. I was offering an hypothetical as an example of the difference between a private choice and public policy. I thought it was clear--sorry if it was not.

    ... immigration does not necessarily “promote indigenous dispossession”. Second, how does your proposal meet constitutional scrutiny?

    All immigration without strict limits on immigrant's behavior promotes a degree of indigenous dispossession. If immigrants are allowed to vote, hold property, etc., it proportionally dispossesses citizens. I have no problem with immigrants of the proper sort. But their ought to be strict limits on what they can and can't do, in my view. No immigrant should be granted full citizenship. Maybe after several generations their progeny could apply. I don't know. An ethnostate where citizens are tied to the land by clan, religion, and family is the best situation. Not practical for the US, which is essentially a global Special Economic Zone. Whoever can bring enough cash to the table is allowed free rein. America will have to fail before meaningful change can take place, I suspect.

    I have no problem with immigrants of the proper sort. But their ought to be strict limits on what they can and can’t do, in my view. No immigrant should be granted full citizenship. Maybe after several generations their progeny could apply. I don’t know. An ethno state where citizens are tied to the land by clan, religion, and family is the best situation.

    The interesting point here is that immigration always seems to start as an economic story. Immigrants come because the US and Europe offer low paying jobs that the locals don’t want to do. So the problem comes later when they get English, German, Swedish or American passports while they’re not integrated in any real way.

    Some countries have a much better way of getting round this problem.

    For example, Spain is a moderately rich European country with a large agro industry and Spaniards are no longer willing to do the hard low paid work in the fields. Their solution is to offer temporary “foreign resident” status to immigrants, coupled to an obligation to make contributions to the national health insurance system. There’s no question of voting rights or gaining citizenship although they are protected by Spanish law in the same way as as Spanish citizens.

    Further along the scale, a very rich country like Switzerland has many more types of lower level jobs that the Swiss are unwilling to do, so they have a correspondingly larger immigrant population. They give out time specific work contracts with the job already identified prior to the worker (not immigrant) arriving in the country. There’s no question of the North African road repair men becoming Swiss nationals. And it works quite well with everyone knowing who they are and why they’re there.

    Read More
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett

    For example, Spain is a moderately rich European country with a large agro industry and Spaniards are no longer willing to do the hard low paid work in the fields.
     
    The key words here are "low paid". Spain has high youth unemployment. Businesses prefer to bring in foreign workers than to increase wages to the point that unemployed people are willing to do the work.

    The same pattern is repeated throughout the Western world. It is impossible to live a decent life in London on minimum wage, because rents are so high. The problem is solved by bringing in foreign workers who are willing to live in overcrowded shared accommodation.

    Well-meaning people used to tell us that the poor were "left behind", and needed help to catch up with mainstream society. You don't hear that kind of talk so much now. When people succeed in escaping poverty, wealthy countries import poor people from other countries to take their place.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ThreeCranes
    "a large adjustment knob to zero their sniper rifles, which could be done with gloves in freezing weather, while German ‘superior engineering’ required a tool to adjust..."

    Good points. This brings to mind a theory I've developed after having worked on American, Japanese and German automobiles, especially 1960-1970 models which were more like their 1940's progenitors than their 2010 descendants.

    It just seems to me that American stuff was easier to field service. Simple, rugged or, if you want to speak plainly, crude and overbuilt. But when something breaks down during an advance, you can't return it to a spanking-clean shop for repair so simple becomes a real virtue. The advance advances.

    For example, every mechanic knows that it was a bear to replace a clutch in a 1970's- 1980's Japanese vehicle. That's because the car was assembled with the transmission already attached to the engine (as it still is today and as is virtually every other car now). The bolts to separate them were inaccessible without an overhead lift. Actually, the repair manuals recommend that you pull the whole engine/transmission assembly to do the job!

    By way of contrast, the transmission on a Ford truck was held on with 6 bolts, all accessible from underneath the truck while it sat on the ground (as I can attest, having removed one while lying on my back with the truck parked on the side of a busy road).

    It just seems to me that American stuff was easier to field service. Simple, rugged or, if you want to speak plainly, crude and overbuilt. But when something breaks down during an advance, you can’t return it to a spanking-clean shop for repair so simple becomes a real virtue. The advance advances.

    And if you really want to stretch an analogy, Democracy needs to work the same way – being simple, well designed and easy to maintain locally and with no complex parts. No need for the expensive and useless Washington “repair shop”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Avery
    {Has any people in history ever got their asses so thoroughly kicked, lost so much territory so quickly, or collapsed so incompetently on the battlefield, as Russians in the first 6 months of invasion? (6 months, mind you, not 6 weeks).}

    Yes: France.
    They lost their entire country.

    Wehrmacht vanquished all of France in 46 days.
    France in fact had about 1,000 more and newer tanks than Germany in 1940.
    (Germany ~2,400. France ~3,400)
    More guns. (Germany ~7,400. France ~14,000).
    Same number of divisions/troops.
    France folded in 46 days.

    The BEF and the French ran – ran - to Dunkirk to escape the advancing panzers.
    Pretty much most of Europe, save for neutrals and Nazi allies, was under Nazi occupation by the end of 1939, after the occupation of Poland in Oct 6,1939.
    Compare the size of Nazi occupied Europe vs size of Nazi occupied USSR*: which is larger?

    Please indeed.

    *
    Germans reached roughly the line from Leningrad to Moscow to Stalingrad.
    http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/map.cfm?map_id=2888

    Wehrmacht vanquished all of France in 46 days.
    France in fact had about 1,000 more and newer tanks than Germany in 1940.
    (Germany ~2,400. France ~3,400)
    More guns. (Germany ~7,400. France ~14,000).
    Same number of divisions/troops.
    France folded in 46 days.

    That’s a good point and often missed. The Germany invasion of France didn’t have anything like the probability of success awarded to it by hindsight. Adam Tooze came to the same conclusion in his excellent book on the German war economy; https://www.amazon.com/Wages-Destruction-Making-Breaking-Economy/dp/0143113208/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1501397926&sr=8-1&keywords=adam+tooze+wages+of+destruction

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anon • Disclaimer says:

    Very Strange. The destruction of Great Britain. The very first white country to allow its ‘voluntary’ racial disintegration. And after being on the “winning” side of WW2. Very, very , very strange indeed. I have often wondered about this. Who EXACTLY passed the 1948 Commonwealth citizenship act? WHY didn’t they realize what would happen?

    OR DID THEY…..???

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    The British fought two wholly needless wars with the Germans only to turn around and give away their country through an unopposed invasion of black and brown aliens. I just do not get it.

    They beat the Germans in military struggle.

    They lost to the Glob in financial and ideological struggle.

    UK and Canada, like the US, became occupied by the Left and then the Glob.

    Also, if the 'finest hour' of UK was defeating race-supremacist Nazis, then the UK had to purge everything 'racist' about it to live up the worthy title of victors over Germans.

    Also, there was Negro pop culture that Brits became addicted to. They grew tired of their own culture as repressive and boring. They felt liberated by black funk.
    , @Philip Owen
    Large numbers of Commonwealth Citizens volunteered to fight with Britain including millions of Indians and many skilled West Indians in the RAF. The Commonwealth Citizenship act was a symbolic acknowledgement of that debt. And a continuous nation of the UK's open Borders/ free trade/gold standard policy from before the 1929 crash. We are going that way again. Brexit means Brexit.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @iffen
    Russia on the other hand has incomparable long term track record of beating who is who in military universe.

    Yeah, that severe ass-whuppin they put on the Japanese in 1904-1905 stands out as one for the record books.

    Do you know what track record is ? Know of 1939 Halkin Gol and Manchurian operations? What wars against and peers uk and USA ever won on their own?

    Read More
    • Replies: @David In TN
    The Russo-Japanese war is part of "the track record." And why wasn't the Soviet army able to install Otto Kuusinen as head of a puppet government in Finland in December 1939?

    Speaking of WW II, the Soviet Union was the only major belligerent with only one front to fight on. The largest front to be sure, but advantageous compared to having major battle zones on air, land, and sea thousands of miles apart.
    , @iffen
    Do you know what track record is ?

    Apparently not.

    I would, for example, include that ass-kicking you gave to the mujahedeen in Afghanistan in the 70's and 80's.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    USSR did won lonesome. Those 80% were the best of the best and when it mattered. After 1944 it did not matter how many Germans would Allies KIA. The matter was settled before they landed. Germany lost in the East and then it was just agony. USSR would finish this business regardless of western allies entering the war or not. Hence lonesome but with a little help in the end.

    Without western allied material help, the USSR would have lost and lost badly. Soviet troops rode to battle on Studebaker trucks, running on American gas, while stuffing themselves with Spam and breat made from American wheat. The Soviets couldn’t even supply themselves with telephone wire. Soviet fighters flew on high octain aviation gas. The Soviet airforce was suplemented with fighters, bombers and transports from the West.

    Bear in mind that the Brits and the US fought both Germany/Italy etc. and the empire of Japan. The soviets only joined the fight when Japan was collapsing. Before that they were happy to have a nonaggression pact with the Japanese.

    The people of the Soviet Union were fighting for their lives against a regime every bit as evil as their own. But without our help they would have been destroyed. Keepm that in mind before you brag about the great Russian people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    No. USSR would not lose without so called lend lease. Firstly the whole help constituted mere 4% of what Soviet Union produced and invested in resources terms. Second, lend lease started arriving in any significant numbers at the end of 1943 when outcome of the war was no longer in question.soviet army broke Wermacht back by then all alone. What you are saying is just a feel good matra by the West to feel better. Without USSR involvement Britain would have been eventually overan. Without Western help and landing it would take a bit longer but the outcome would have been Soviet army at meditteranian beaches. Moscow, Stalingrad and Kursk three major battles that decided outcome of the WW2 in Europe too place before western help started arriving in large enough numbers and we'll before Normandy landing. Looks like "partners" wanted to be sure investment would not be in vain and joined in person when it was sure Germany lost the war and was weak enough to be easy picking. The goal was to prevent USSR sole gegemony over Europe which was deserved.
    , @NoseytheDuke
    You do know of course that the material support was deliberately withheld for as long as possible in order to "bleed" the USSR?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @TheJester
    If I can follow the above narrative, the British won the battle for WWII ... but then quickly lost the war for survival. The British held off an invasion by the Germans (close relatives in language, religion, history, and culture) only to be swallowed whole a few years later by an invasion from a basket of Third World peoples with alien languages, religions, cultures, and a significantly lower average IQ.

    At Dunkirk and throughout WWII, the British stood united as a people with purpose as they fought for their survival as a free people. However, they were never consulted about the follow-on invasion. The second invasion was quietly implemented by the Foreign Office and other government apparatchiks. It was undemocratic and, in practical terms, forthrightly treasonous.

    The new reality: London has a Muslim mayor. The country is filled with mosques and "no-g0" areas policed by Muslim religious police enforcing Islamic-sanctioned social behaviors. Sharia Law has official status in British civil cases. Gangs of Muslim youth roam the streets beating up whites because they are white. Other Muslims traffick white teenage girls into drugs and prostitution. London is experiencing a brash of random acid attacks on innocent people. Female circumcision and honor killings are quietly tolerated.

    A short stint of occupation by the Wehrmacht in WWII might have been preferable to this reality. It is doubtful that Chancellor Hitler would have tolerated open borders and a massive invasion by alien peoples and cultures. Indeed, Hitler admired his British cousins and their empire. He, in fact, sought a peace treaty with Britain that would have given Britain a free hand in their overseas empire in return for the Germans having a free hand in Europe. He wanted a partnership, not conquest.

    The open question is, Why did the British fight WWII against enormous odds ... only to quickly fold as gelded "cucks" to an invasion that is marking the end of Britain as a country and the British as a people? Losing their army at Dunkirk, suing Germany for peace, or suffering a short occupation would not have had such a disastrous outcome.

    So, in the final analysis, Dunkirk was a Pyrrhic victory. An uplifting story or fortitude and heroism that, in the final analysis, did little to protect the survival of Britain as a country and the British as a people.

    Have to agree 100% with what you say. If the goal was to preserve the racial and cultural integrity of Britain then the two German wars were completely pointless and the real rape of Britain (non-whites arriving) should have been prevented at any cost.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Joe Wong
    I hope the author would mean Winston Churchill, Robert Vansittart, and a gang of ruthless colonial imperialist warmongers are the “People Should be Hung from Lampposts, They Should be Burned Alive, for What They've Done to Britain.”

    Mind you, the British troops were in the foreign land, it is not right for the invader to bear such bitter feeling and victimhood sentiment by being kicked out of their occupied land. On the other hand people said the British imitates the Roman, while the American is born out the British; the Roman called destroying Carthaginian and salted their land "creating peace," no wonder the American and the British go berserk when people kicks the American and British out of their homeland, and resort to bombing, killing and waterboarding on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation as humanitarian intervention to avenge their "humiliation."

    If only their was a logical point to anything you said sport.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anony-mouse
    1/ A bit of a complication. There may have been no non-Whites at Dunkirk, but there were lots of them in Burma, Singapore and Hong Kong, and there had been many in the trenches in the previous go-round.

    2/ Wasn't it the Dunkirk generation who began the opening of the doors. Between 1945 and Powell's speech who was doing the voting?

    Your mischaracterizing the situation. NOBODY ever voted for non-white immigration. Had it EVER been put to a vote in ANY white country it would have been annihilated at the voting booth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Your mischaracterizing the situation. NOBODY ever voted for non-white immigration. Had it EVER been put to a vote in ANY white country it would have been annihilated at the voting booth."

    Actually, immigration has been put up to a vote...repeatedly. Not by citizens directly, of course, but by representatives in a legislature who were elected by citizens. Think next time, ok?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The British fought two wholly needless wars with the Germans only to turn around and give away their country through an unopposed invasion of black and brown aliens. I just do not get it.

    My own country, Canada, 98% white as recently as 1970, committed the same insanity….

    Read More
    • Agree: CanSpeccy
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    Australia too.
    , @CanSpeccy
    You can thank Pierre Trudeau for the decline of the European settlers of Canada. Before Trudeau, Canada had a fertility rate well above replacement, and a young dynamic population. Trudeau's government voided the anti-abortion law and introduced no-fault divorce, with the result that, when Trudeau left office in 1984, Canada's fertility rate was below replacement. Today, Canadians, with more room than citizens of any other country in the world have a fertility rate barely two-thirds the replacement rate.

    And to confirm the contempt of the Trudeau's for Canadians, Trudeau the Second, recently informed the New York Times that Canada is a post-National state, without a core identity.

    And most recently, Trudeau II dissed Canadians again by telling immigrants they were more worthy of Canada than those born in Canada, immigrants having deliberately chosen to live in this wonderful land of the Trudeau's, a land with no culture, no core, no loyalty of the ruling elite to the people, many of whose ancestors have worked and paid taxes in Canada and fought wars for Canada for generations.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @attilathehen
    No.

    What is your ethnic background?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ThreeCranes
    Today, no revolution can succeed without the use of shoulder fired missiles or rocket propelled grenades. For a first-world subject people to successfully shrug off the yoke of an occupying, alien class it would have to attack at the most vulnerable point and that is helicopter and limousine commutes into the cities that are home to its nerve center, the great banks and corporate headquarters.

    In Afghanistan, the shoulder fired missile was the game changer against the Russkies.

    Such an assault would force the alien Elite to retaliate by bombing pockets of resistance. This would provoke the general population to such a pitch of fury that they would rally behind a charismatic leader who would organize the people into a militia and they would drive out the invader/occupier. This has been the blueprint for all successful revolutions.

    In Iraq the game-changer was the IED.

    I’m currently reading Vietnam: The Australian War. I had no idea previously that mines planted by Australians and deftly recovered by VC and NVA accounted for so many US and ANZAC casualties.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @George Orwell
    Watching China become a great power yet again while the British get continually humiliated is one of the best pleasures of the 21st century. The Suez Crisis? Hilarious!

    China will never be a great power. Since the start of their one child policy they have performed over 400 million abortions.

    In the 1980s, Japan was supposed to takeover the world and we were all going to turn Japanese. That didn’t happen.

    China’s collapse is coming.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "If “individual freedom” is detrimental to the West, the person must be removed."

    In a word, no, since YOU are making the unilateral decision based on loosey goosey standards that a person's acts are "detrimental" to the point of being removed. Your thought process is in the extreme minority.

    Now, if you are so directly threatened by his presence, why don't you personally do something about it? Or are you just another impotent arm chair warrior?

    This will happen as immigration laws are changed. A problem like Derbyshire did not just pop up. It’s been simmering for a while, but now that Trump won, there will be changes.

    The good thing is Derbyshire’s spawn is useless so he can see his mistakes fail before his eyes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @mp
    Did you not read what I wrote?

    Umm...you didn't write all of that stuff until I called you on it. But I just read what you wrote now.

    Who is smarter than whom? I don't know...smart is as smart does, I guess.

    Next, until middle aged Chinese women start strapping on dynamite and blowing things up, I'm not worrying about them, too much. I do, however, think that mixed race kids have it more difficult at times. It depends on how adaptable the race is, the extended family structure, and social views on the matter. The latter can change more easily than the former two. Not a hanging offense. Have you been reading much Turner Diaries, lately, by any chance?

    I generally believe that an ethnostate (re: Wilmot Robertson) is the way to go. There should be no naturalized citizens. At least for several generations--maybe five or six. This would preclude immigrant voting, etc. And anyone married to a foreigner would not be allowed to conduct public policy, or vote. Dual citizenship would never be allowed. Foreigners should not be allowed to own property. Plato's outline in Laws seems just, to me.

    One other thing. It takes real alpha male courage to come on a blog and claim, anonymously, that another person, by name, should be killed. Brimelow uses his own name when he calls for someone, not named, to be hanged. That's bad enough. Who is he talking about? He doesn't say. And now you want to hang Derbyshire. Both statements smack of the rodent. Brimelow for being squirrelly, and you for being weaselly.

    Brimelow is just writing his usual cuck nonsense. It is easy to “answer” Brimelow as to who should be hanged, i.e., Derbyshire, because Brimelow refuses to accept that troublemakers like Derbyshire and the Jews have played a role in the destruction of England.

    Brimelow will always give in to the Jews. He’s just babbling.

    Read More
    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    Are you Iranian?

    No.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    What is your ethnic background?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Achmed E. Newman

    His wife and daughter vote against the interests of the USA.
     
    That is a woman thing, not a China thing, Attila. The century-long experiment in the vote for women has been a major part of this country's downfall.

    Also, why don't you worry about your own family and not Mr. Derbyshire's? This is not a gossip column, and you are not a 14-y/o schoolgirl. Or, are you ??

    “Achmed E. Newman” – are you a Muslim/Jew? Are you involved with Asians? Are you a Catholic?

    I can comment on Derbyshire because he is part of the problem – he married this woman. I listed facts and again I get nonsense.

    My family is kosher. Derbyshire’s family is not.

    When you say women caused these problems, you have to look at the different types of women. White, black, Asian, Jewish, Christian. Most of the women in the USA who vote for welfare are black women. Most white married women vote for the GOP.

    The only century long experiment (1917-2017) that bothers me is the push for “universal brotherhood” and “universal church.” I am interested in IQ which is related to race. From this we can separate those who don’t belong in the West. Then we can begin to make the changes we need to regenerate Western countries. We know that IQ is the most important factor for the success of a nation.

    Your misogyny makes me believe there is something not kosher about you. (((Stefan Molyneux))) babbles about how women are to blame for the social welfare state. Japan does not have problems like these because they are a homogeneous nation that does not allow immigrants into their country. Welfare can only work in a country like Japan.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Avery
    {...who had gone from their secure island to the continent to defend someone else’s borders, not their own.}

    Didn't British BIF* leave their secure island a couple of centuries prior to create an empire over which the sun never set? It's not like it was the first time they had left the island....... And their imperial presence was rarely to defend someone else.

    Regarding ' defend someone else’s borders': I doubt very much Brits sent BEF to defend someone else's border. It was the case of "We fight them there, so we don't have to fight them here". Brits, for a couple centuries or so, got themselves involved in the European continental affairs because they always feared European continental powers being united. Brits, being on a resource poor island, always feared a united continental Europe could starve them. So were always creating conflict between the great powers of the continent.

    UK got itself involved in WW2 to prevent Nazi Germany from creating a Gross Germania in Europe, not because they gave a hoot about Poland. Which would most certainly have taken place had Hitler not invaded USSR.

    Notwithstanding the 'heroic' myth of Dunkirk, where Brits and French ran like chickens in front of the Panzers, and Hitler pretty much _let_ them escape at Dunkirk.
    _________
    * British Imperial Forces

    Yes, Hitler let them escape at Dunkirk. At least that’s the German point of view. They admit that it was a great blunder. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/dunkirk-75th-anniversary-real-reason-hitler-let-british-troops-go-1503201

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cortes
    No doubt the author will be in Parliament Square on Monday at the head of a band of torch- and pitchfork-wielding geriatric Brexiteers.

    Ah, yes. The easy words of the tosspot "exile."

    Cmon, break out your hordes.

    Yap, yap and thrice yap.

    Some people are idea people and can’t be bothered with the details of carrying out the ideas.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • No doubt the author will be in Parliament Square on Monday at the head of a band of torch- and pitchfork-wielding geriatric Brexiteers.

    Ah, yes. The easy words of the tosspot “exile.”

    Cmon, break out your hordes.

    Yap, yap and thrice yap.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Some people are idea people and can't be bothered with the details of carrying out the ideas.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @German_reader

    so some German women and girls were raped by the Red Army Rapists. So fucking what!
     
    That's not what I wrote...but those events happened 70 years ago, can't be changed, and I'm more concerned with present-day issues (like possibly getting stabbed to death by Islamists in a supermarket as happened yesterday in Hamburg).
    You guys get so overly emotional about all this WW2 stuff, that's not healthy.

    You guys get so overly emotional about all this WW2 stuff, that’s not healthy.

    Stick to the facts and drop the free, online psychologizing and health advice. None of us is here for that even if you were qualified to offer it.

    FYI, it’s an absolute necessity to debunk the lies told back then because it helps people to understand what’s being done today.

    In fact, every well informed, intelligent person knows that ancient history has lessons for today.

    There is no excuse for any literate person if he is less than three thousand years old in mind.

    – B.H. Liddell Hart (Thoughts on War, 143)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • It’s probably a bit too early to think about hanging them from lamp posts. But when the time comes, it will be a good way for many of us to relieve our righteous anger. There will doubtless be many who will say that when that time comes, we should be magnanimous, that we should let the better angels of our nature govern us. But if they ultimately triumph, they will show us no mercy. They have nothing but disdain, even contempt for us. To them our lives have value only if we’re making money for them. If we’re not, they’ll eliminate us like vermin. We need to do unto them what they would do unto us. But do it first.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RobRich
    400,000 Brits on the beaches, Dunkirk chaos, Hitler rejoices.

    400,000 Americans on the beaches, Normandy, Hitler is Toast.


    Bless the Brits for their stubbornness. But US grit wins when our leaders let it win. As Churchill acknowledged in the same speech.

    Tool.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    You are delusional. Neither UK or USA ever was able to win against peer nation be it Napoleonic France or Germany alone. Mostly coming to finish already defeated by someone else aka Russia/ USSR enemy. All those conquests you mention are nothing to be proud in military terms. Modern military attacking basically Savage people barely out of stone age. Before Bonaparte got annihilated in Russia, things were not going well for Anglo Saxon. Were as usually fighting using someone else. The only thing that prevented UK from being overan all the time was geography. Russia on the other hand has incomparable long term track record of beating who is who in military universe. Note, Russia conquered the whole territory from Ural to Pacific barely with few hundred people starting with ermak in the most inhospitable location. Defeated Napoleon and Nazi Germany without any military assistance from allies.

    Russia on the other hand has incomparable long term track record of beating who is who in military universe.

    Yeah, that severe ass-whuppin they put on the Japanese in 1904-1905 stands out as one for the record books.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    Do you know what track record is ? Know of 1939 Halkin Gol and Manchurian operations? What wars against and peers uk and USA ever won on their own?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Joe Wong
    Sorry, you are upset, but you took my comments in the wrong way, I merely point out the facts that the British and their offshoots have been hiding those facts by manufacturing consent and fake news. Hiding crimes against humanity, crimes against peace and war crimes committed by the British and their offshoots in the last 300 years under democracy, human rights, and other moral high ground is simply hypocrisy that everybody should have the duty to expose it for the human sanity's sake.

    Dynasties got created and overthrown on the regular basis in Chinese history. Manchu was on their dying leg, without the European help to crash the Taipin revolution, Manchu would have been overthrown 60 years earlier, this is another fact the British is claiming credit where credit is not due.

    Mao did not kill a single person himself, but you want to blame all the Chinese killed on him because he was the leader, then the British should not complain the others blaming all the people killed due to British actions on the British and their offshoots, that number will be in the hundreds of millions, which will make Mao look like an amateur.

    BTW the number of people killed in the Great Leap Forward was based on Judith Banister's “massive death toll” hypothesis at the US Bureau of the Census, the number increases by the year, it was 30 million Judith proposed, nowadays it was between 80 to 100 million, what is the number you believe it should be?

    I don’t know what the real numbers were, but I know a physician who came out of one of the prison camps who survived only because he ate tomatoes (the only food) for months on end. While he did not like to discuss the particulars, he did say that in his camp alone there were 300 people dying every day due to starvation and untreated disease. There were many more camps nearby so the numbers that died just in his locality must have been very high.

    Now the question would be why was he interred. It was very simple, he came from a well off family, and he had received his education in America. That was all it took.

    Why was he still there when the communists took over? Well it was very simple, he believed their lies, that they would create a better China. He thought they were for the common man… and he wanted to help. His sister, who was trained as a dentist, did not believe in the Communists and so escaped to Hong Kong and later came to Canada.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sergey Krieger
    You are delusional. Neither UK or USA ever was able to win against peer nation be it Napoleonic France or Germany alone. Mostly coming to finish already defeated by someone else aka Russia/ USSR enemy. All those conquests you mention are nothing to be proud in military terms. Modern military attacking basically Savage people barely out of stone age. Before Bonaparte got annihilated in Russia, things were not going well for Anglo Saxon. Were as usually fighting using someone else. The only thing that prevented UK from being overan all the time was geography. Russia on the other hand has incomparable long term track record of beating who is who in military universe. Note, Russia conquered the whole territory from Ural to Pacific barely with few hundred people starting with ermak in the most inhospitable location. Defeated Napoleon and Nazi Germany without any military assistance from allies.

    Napoleonic France had twice the population of Great Britain, and Britain had to cross the Channel to supply its men. The Russian conquest of ‘the Urals to the Pacific’ was essentially the conquest of a whole lot of nothing and, unlike Britain conquering America, Australia, etc, they didn’t have to cross an ocean to do it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    You're saying you feed on leftovers of black men.

    They are like lions who eat the prime meat. Once they had their fill and fun with white women and look for fresh ones, you enter like hyena or vulture and feed on the scraps. This is what makes you happy?

    Imagine a restaurant. You order something, but the Negro takes the plate and eats the best meat. After he's finished, you feed on leftover scraps. It's like dogs feeding on scrapes from a doggy bag.

    It's just another kind of cuck-behavior.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJgNgj-scH8

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa0lf3BLepw

    “You’re saying you feed on leftovers of black men.”

    Hahaha….

    Funny, but I never said that. You’re putting words in my mouth.

    A woman isn’t a bar of soap. Just because one man has moved his schlong back and forth in her doesn’t mean that she was worn down by that. She won’t erode away.

    I’ll let you in on a secret. I never asked for a complete run down of a woman’s escapades before I’d consider boffing her. If she was boffable and willing then I was game. As Zorba the Greek said, the worst sin a man can commit is not to give love to a woman who stands in need of it.

    And for all you and I know, the black guy himself was “feed[ing] on leftovers” as you put it. I doubt they were first to plow that field.

    But to give you a serious response to the issue you raise; some women I was with did reveal that at some time in their past they had been with a Negro! Well, what of it? They didn’t have children (by the way) so I wasn’t inheriting some other guy’s spawn. I was just playing around with a woman, one of many attractive women I consorted with. It’s not like I married them. I ain’t no cuck.

    As one of them* (the lovely daughter of a SeaFair Queen) used to say, “Everyone has a history”.

    *not one of the Negro boffers

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Achmed E. Newman

    I guess he’s not saying there was no Gulag, just that the one Solzhenitsyn described didn’t exist.
     
    I see, Iffen. I don't believe Martyanov on this, but I'm no Russian.

    There was Gulag, but Solzhenicin numbers and stories existed in his mind only. Archives were opened long time ago. Since 1921 till 1953 there were some 3 millions plus repressed with some 700 thousand plus executed. Far cry from Solzhenicin lies and frankly necessary measures considering times and situation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.