The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / By Mattea Kramer
 All Comments / By Mattea Kramer
    Back in 1992, a certain New York real estate mogul told a reporter from New York magazine that you have to treat women “like shit.” That was a perfect summary of his philosophy, but it may be an even better descriptor for the way many women treat themselves -- or, rather, how they’re treated by...
  • The Left’s downward spiral into insanity continues. All they have left to talk about are the mocking, tormenting voices in their heads. The worst part is that they could well take the rest of us down with them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In normal times, Dee from New York would have ordered her copy of The Handmaid’s Tale from Amazon, but these are not normal times. Amazon is on the Grab Your Wallet list, a campaign to boycott retailers that sell Trump family products, which began as a response to the video revealing our now-president’s penchant for...
  • Boycott Trump if it makes you feel good. But your puny efforts are not needed. The Spooks and the very Special Persecutor will drive him from office. I predict you will be surprised and appalled at the blow back. The 56 million people who elected Trump are real even though you cannot see them. Many of them are disappointed with Trump. But they still feel the same way about you that you feel about them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I’ll tell you up front that my personal vehicle has crowns of rust on the rear wheel wells and an interior that smells vaguely of dog puke. It’s a 2006 Mazda3 with 150,244 miles on it and it gets me around my modest world well enough, but I sure never considered it the stuff of...
  • . But to Cubans, those ancient vehicles — whose only original parts are their steel bodies, welded together and repainted untold numbers of times — are just evidence of their island’s pervasive scarcity.

    You must have missed seeing the new car showrooms that abound everywhere. Mostly Japanese models, plus VWs , Chinese coming ?

    In 2016, President Obama relaxed some of its rules so that Americans can nowlegally visit, subject to certain limitations; our new president could rescind that freedom on a whim.

    We visited legally about ten years ago to make a film, among other things. President Bush recinded that freedom on a whim.

    http://robertmagill.wordpress.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • OK. I’ll admit, as a sometimes old-car aficionado, there is a certain allure to traveling to Cuba. But then my pragmatic self reminds me that Cuba is depressingly like going to Mexico. Get the local flavor, mix it up with the cabbies and the hoi-polloi, recklessly seek out some cheap street drugs and hit the beaches or the quaint, non-air-conditioned eateries. The narcissistic come away feeling proud to be an American. The empathic think ‘I thought the hair-lip thing had been eradicated’.
    No thanks.
    I think I’ll stay home and ponder the reasons why I’m suddenly so caught up in determining an author’s political persuasion (thank you so much, mainstream media).
    In some odd, epiphany moment, a reflective article about Time Warp Island has nudged me back on track, baby steps as they may be. Reminding that my memory of a time when politics seemed less about identity and group and the only thing is not a made-up memory. Like almost all memories, it was better back then. When did I start pondering the co-dependency of SJWs, Right-Wing war mongers and Zero-sum isolationists? As a continually struggling entrepreneur, who the hell has time to do political debate every time you meet someone? Hell, I have a younger wife and a 13 year-old daughter at home. Honestly, between those two and work, well, you know……
    So maybe there’s hope for me still. Self-diagnosis is apparently half the battle, right? For that alone, I thank you Mattea Kramer.
    Oh, and one more thing: You and Hubby didn’t happen to bring any cigars back home with you, did you…?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The fluorescent circus of Election 2016 -- that spectacle of yellow comb-overs, and orange skin, and predatory pussy-grabbing, and last-minute FBI interventions, and blinking memes hewn by an underground army of self-important Internet trolls -- has finally come to its unnatural end. I had looked forward to this moment, only to find us all instantly...
  • Thank you. This is a good reminder.

    I think the issue you’re talking about with a focus on American lives is part of the broader issue of overvaluing things that are near you (in terms of physical or relationship distance), and the question of whether that’s morally sound is an interesting one whose answer is probably, but not definitely, no.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Eh, don’t nurture that guilt complex too much (unless you’re enjoying it, of course). I strongly suspect any twenty-something of any nationality doesn’t believe it can happen to them…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The crowd that gathered in an airplane hangar in the desert roared with excitement when the man on stage vowed to murder women and children. It was just another Donald Trump campaign event, and the candidate had affirmed his previously made pledge not only to kill terrorists but to “take out” their family members, too....
  • @biz
    People in Yemen and Afghanistan don't care about their own women and children, so these are crocodile tears on their part. They cover their women in trash bags and marry off their children to cousins before puberty. If they don't care about their own women and children, why is it our job to prioritize their women and children over ours?

    What a bizarre thing to say. Because their cultural customs offend your delicate sense of propriety, they’re incapable of love. That’s your first non-sequitur.

    But the second really takes the cake. Those people don’t love each other, therefore we can kill as many as we want. That’s just morally grotesque.

    The third is almost as bad. How does killing innocents halfway around the world make us any safer? Part of the author’s point is that it just encourages those who loved them to take revenge.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • […] of terrorists and using torture. But mainstream politicians have already recommended and even done that much and more without the level of censure that Trump is receiving. Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush […]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @RadicalCenter
    Then your german friends are brainwashed, self-hating pussies. I speak some German and our children attend German class on the weekend where we meet many German parents, and we encounter this sickening attitude among them too -- though not uniformly, if one can speak with them privately.

    your german friends are brainwashed, self-hating pussies. . . .we encounter this sickening attitude among them too

    Americans are just as thoroughly brainwashed.

    tripped over this Facebook page from a bunch of millenials — people with advanced degrees from allegedly reputable universities — they’re fully supportive of Killery and intensely engaged in a DonaldDrumph movement.

    They were particularly outraged at the Trump pledge, which, of course, was branded “just like Hitler.” http://winningdemocrats.com/this-is-terrifying-trump-rally-looks-like-a-picture-out-of-nazi-germany-video/

    Six or seven years of very expensive education did not teach them enough critical thinking skills to enable them to tear apart the 13-year old cut-and-paste piece.

    Not only that, these graduate-degreed experts in Communications (!) failed to do a simple fact-check: Turns out Umberto Eco did the critical analysis for them: Trump is to Hitler as chalk is to cheese — http://www.researchforprogress.us/topic/concept/fascism-umberto-eco-slam-dunks-lawrence-britt/

    The kicker-über alles is that one of the participants on this FB does communications work for Booz-Allen.

    Heil Zakheim.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I wonder if the particularly sadistic practice of firing an initial missile then waiting for
    people to respond and then firing on the help, is still going on?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • […] of terrorists and using torture. But mainstream politicians have already recommended and even done that much and more without the level of censure that Trump is receiving. Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush […]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • […] of terrorists and using torture. But mainstream politicians have already recommended and even done that much and more without the level of censure that Trump is receiving. Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush […]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Fred Z
    My German family and their friends had personal experience of this in April 1945 when the allies "terror bombed" Paderborn.

    They were unanimous in their comments to me that this bombing, even very late in the war, was not an evil and was necessary. They felt no ill will, no rancor, just regret at their own stupidity in having supported Hitler.

    Then your german friends are brainwashed, self-hating pussies. I speak some German and our children attend German class on the weekend where we meet many German parents, and we encounter this sickening attitude among them too — though not uniformly, if one can speak with them privately.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous

    your german friends are brainwashed, self-hating pussies. . . .we encounter this sickening attitude among them too
     
    Americans are just as thoroughly brainwashed.

    tripped over this Facebook page from a bunch of millenials -- people with advanced degrees from allegedly reputable universities -- they're fully supportive of Killery and intensely engaged in a DonaldDrumph movement.

    They were particularly outraged at the Trump pledge, which, of course, was branded "just like Hitler." http://winningdemocrats.com/this-is-terrifying-trump-rally-looks-like-a-picture-out-of-nazi-germany-video/

    Six or seven years of very expensive education did not teach them enough critical thinking skills to enable them to tear apart the 13-year old cut-and-paste piece.

    Not only that, these graduate-degreed experts in Communications (!) failed to do a simple fact-check: Turns out Umberto Eco did the critical analysis for them: Trump is to Hitler as chalk is to cheese -- http://www.researchforprogress.us/topic/concept/fascism-umberto-eco-slam-dunks-lawrence-britt/

    The kicker-über alles is that one of the participants on this FB does communications work for Booz-Allen.

    Heil Zakheim.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • https://consortiumnews.com/2016/03/07/sleepwalking-toward-catastrophe/

    “At the front Sassoon produced what may be his most memorable offering, Suicide in the Trenches, in which he too castigated the hearty band of war propagandists cheering from the sidelines:

    “You smug faced cowards with kindling eye

    Who cheer as soldier lads march by

    Sneak home and pray you’ll never know

    The Hell where youth and laughter go”

    Siegfried Loraine Sassoon, CBE, MC was an English poet, writer, and soldier. Decorated for bravery on the Western Front, he became one of the leading poets of the First World War. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siegfried_Sassoon

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Pretty Jay says:

    March 8, 2016 at 1:24 am GMT •

    They’re fighting us because we’re meddling in shit that’s not our business and hurting them, it’s so obvious

    And what did Denmark do?

    If Denmark cannot escape being targeted because of some domestic cartoons then I don’t imagine anyone can walk softly enough to avoid upsetting the Muslim lunatics.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • mondo_ cane says:

    March 7, 2016 at 6:19 pm GMT •

    Who in Hell are you to know what other cultures think or care about?

    Someone who bothers to actually listen to what others say rather than the pablum that is put out by the media.

    You have never met or known anyone personally from another culture. I know this because of what you’ve written.

    What you know ain’t really so.

    Two of my friends were Persians who escaped from the Iranian revolution. One of them went back with an uncle to help Khomeini. He got back out through the Kurdish mountains. The uncle was killed inside Iran.

    I know people from many cultures and religions. They are actually people, too. Imagine that. They are humans…

    That is of course the problem.

    We have a military which exists, not because of the lions, tigers, and bears. I have also never had to worry about being attacked by a band of delinquent wolves. Militaries exist because of our fellow man. Human beings created the Gulags, the death camps, the killing fields, the Jihad, and genocide. Pol Pot was a human being, and so was Adolf Hitler. So your stating that they are human beings is not really the reassurance you think it is.

    So, you obviously aren’t a Christian, nor do you associate with any other religion I’m guessing, since no person in touch with his spiritual self would think what you think.

    No I am not a Christian, nor do I have any other religious affiliation. I peer into my heart and it’s black and it’s dark. Sad really.

    Doubtless if I had a spiritual connection like Al Qaeda does, I would be a kinder and gentler person.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I always tell people they need to put themselves in the Arab’s shoes for a second and if they have a shred of conscience they would change their tune. If a foreign gov’t bombed YOUR house and killed your family, how would you feel about that foreign gov’t? Yeah, probably the same way the rag heads feel about us, people need to quit buying the line that they’re fighting us because they “hate our freedoms” that’s bs. They’re fighting us because we’re meddling in shit that’s not our business and hurting them, it’s so obvious, but if you’re one of these people that think you’re not conservative unless you support every single stupid ass thing our government does, you don’t have the brain power to think that hard.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @biz
    People in Yemen and Afghanistan don't care about their own women and children, so these are crocodile tears on their part. They cover their women in trash bags and marry off their children to cousins before puberty. If they don't care about their own women and children, why is it our job to prioritize their women and children over ours?

    Strange that you think people in Afghanistan or Pakistan don’t care about their own children. I have known numerous people from Pakistan and other places. They are not unlike most Americans. Except, that they do not have a sociopathic justification to murder innocents. Your argument is akin to the position of Hitler and the superiority of their master race.

    Perhaps there are people somewhere who feel the same way about Americans as you do about Yemenis. The difference is that they never wanted to attack America until we started poking our noses into their business. To be sure, we are the aggressors.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Sharrukin
    Civilians have always been killed in wars since the dawn of time. Technology has given us drones but it hasn't really altered that basic fact. Western populations are one of the few who feel any great deal of guilt over this truth. Most other cultures don't really care that much. African cultures certainly don't care, nor do Muslims.

    Nations are people. Nations go to war with one another and the populace of those nations are targeted, sometimes deliberately, and sometimes as collateral damage.

    I don't think there has ever been a war in which innocents didn't die. Western militaries go out of their way to avoid civilian casualties, but when all is said and done, they cannot be completely avoided. So don't go to war unless it really matters.

    Who in Hell are you to know what other cultures think or care about? You have never met or known anyone personally from another culture. I know this because of what you’ve written.

    I’m an American. I’ve lived in the Middle East and the Far East. I know people from many cultures and religions. They are actually people, too. Imagine that. They are humans, and they have lived in their homelands longer than America has been a country — much longer.

    They also have families they love as much as you love yours (I suppose you love your family)

    So, you obviously aren’t a Christian, nor do you associate with any other religion I’m guessing, since no person in touch with his spiritual self would think what you think.

    You’re a sad specimen of our species.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @biz
    People in Yemen and Afghanistan don't care about their own women and children, so these are crocodile tears on their part. They cover their women in trash bags and marry off their children to cousins before puberty. If they don't care about their own women and children, why is it our job to prioritize their women and children over ours?

    I’ve met Afghani and Yemeni families. They do indeed care about their loved ones, whether man, woman, or child. Basically what you are saying is that because you disapprove of their sartorial choices and whom they chose to marry and how they choose, that murdering them is a-ok. You clearly possess the sociopathic lack of empathy of which you accuse others. People are people, regardless of their ethnicity or culture.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • … the candidate had affirmed his previously made pledge not only to kill terrorists but to “take out” their family members, too. Outrageous as that might sound …

    It is only outrageous to hand-wringing moralists who think you can play nice with terrorists and they will change for the better. It doesn’t work. The only way to stop terrorism is to make the personal cost of being a terrorist too high. And the only way to do that is to execute their families. The only other thing they hold dear is their absolute devotion to their muslim death cult. And it is also a fact that many terrorists are supported by their families. In Iran, terrorists are treated like martyrs and their families are rewarded with money and community standing.

    Killing their families is good policy as difficult as that my be for you to understand. But you don’t seem to want to understand the muslim death cult anyway.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • […] Read the Whole Article […]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @random observer
    Most major countries who expected they might participate in the next war, or who anticipated their interests might draw them in, planned for many likely eventualities. That's how you plan. If you do it well enough in advance it might help you win. It's a lot smarter than just making it up as you go. The US also planned what armored warfare in Europe might be like, and what naval war in the Pacific might demand. Not doing these things before the war would have been stupid, even for countries that would have tried to stay out.

    Most of them expected to both bomb other countries and be bombed in turn. The US didn't have much to worry on that latter count. Japan did, but didn't plan well enough for it.

    Countries that planned to bomb [US, Japan], to be bombed [France, somewhat], or to both bomb and be bombed [Britain, Germany, Russia, Italy [though they didn't do too much on defense] ] saw their plans tested 1939-45.

    The Germans did medium well on offense- they had planned for strategic bombing but their force structure was more configured for tactical support and for terror bombing of defenceless cities only ahead of the advancing army. They weren't configured for offense on either a sustained basis or against really serious air defenses. The only really long-range bomber was not built for bomb load or self-defense. Their fighters were short range. But they most certainly had not only planned to bomb enemy cities, they had done it in Spain for Franco.

    The British and the US planned better and had better planes for it, at least by 1941-2.

    Considering that most of these countries openly discussed the idea of strategic bombing, with themselves as both offensive and defensive participants, in the 1930s, in both official and public contexts, and tried to prepare their people openly in many cases, it is not surprising that such planning was going on. Besides, all of those same countries pretty well took the view that nothing in international law forbade it. And nothing specific did. That's why it had to be outlawed after the war.

    Whatever else might be said of all that, there was certainly nothing underhanded, conspiratorial, or unlawful about any of these prewar preparations.

    Indeed, and contrary to the modern drone war, the powers of the 1930s at least aimed to wait until an actual war was declared. That's a high standard these days.

    I concede your broader argument, Random Observer: all parties planned and prepared for war. It is also the case the the British planned for an air war against civilians as early as 1920, after terror bombing of Iraqi villages (Arthur Harris was a squadron leader) produced such felicitous results for the British http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-29441383

    The BBC article linked above argues that “civilian bombing of Germany was unsuccessful and the (valiant) British bombers had to destroy Hitler’s war machine.”

    I believe the BBC is engaging in backward chronology: as noted above, http://www.unz.com/article/killing-someone-elses-beloved/#comment-1346149 American military leaders believed that the Wehrmacht was a spent force by December 1941; over a half-year earlier U S military personnel were sent to intensive training in preparation for the Allied Occupation of Germany.

    And yet it was 1942 before the U S Air Force began planning for the carpet bombing of German civilians, and according to the HAER document, German Village was constructed in 1943. http://www.unz.com/article/killing-someone-elses-beloved/#comment-1346149

    The Allies conducted their most lethal planning and preparation for an air war, specifically designed to and intended to kill working class German civilians, only after the German military had been, for all intents and purposes, laid low.

    Very early on Roosevelt had stated publicly that Germany was to be destroyed; no terms other than Unconditional Surrender would be acceptable.

    Roosevelt and Churchill employed that ugliest of all gangster tactics: they killed women and children in order to force the leadership to capitulate.

    (Allied firebombing did not destroy the Reichstag, nor the adjacent Opera House where the German government met during the war, the Reichstag having remained in its damaged state post-Reichstag fire in 1933. Nevertheless, Russians considered taking the Reichstag to be a symbolic coup d’grace and after fierce fighting took the building on May 2 1945, five days before Germany surrendered.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • […] Read the Whole Article […]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In this interview

    that Trump gave during the 2nd term of Bush he speaks strongly against the war in Iraq and shows compassion for the dead Iraqis. No politician or pundit ever made such a strong statement in mainstream media.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • joe webb says:

    March 7, 2016 at 1:12 am GMT •

    liberal handwringing. Girlie men. Got to stop the muzzies…it is that simple.

    Of course the jews started it but we are in it now.

    Muslims invaded Christian Egypt, Christian North Africa, Zoroastrian Persia, Hindu India, Byzantium, the Balkans, Spain, Sicily, and the Frankish kingdom of Charles Martel. The Jews didn’t start any of these things, nor did Israel even exist when the United States first clashed with Islam in the Barbary Wars.

    Islam is theologically at war with everyone else. That aggression was in abeyance for the period of European colonial dominance, but is now returning to its historical norm.

    Islam needs no casus belli because violent expansion is at the core of the Koran.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • liberal handwringing. Girlie men. Got to stop the muzzies…it is that simple.

    Of course the jews started it but we are in it now. Arab IQ is average 85. Let them lie in the bed they more or less made by letting israel in in the first place.

    IN 1948, Palestine clans were fighting one-another rather than killing jews. They deserve the fruits of their stupidity.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Ronnie Evil says:

    March 6, 2016 at 8:24 pm GMT •

    But to suggest that we of the West are no different than the Muslims we are fighting is patently absurd.

    My apologies. It was not my intent to suggest that we in the west behave in the same way as the more savage cultures. We do not.

    Part, and only part, of the reason for that is that we are usually more powerful than our opponents and can afford to take the high road. The VC in Vietnam also behaved in a brutal fashion and the United States by and large did not do the same, though there were exceptions. They were of course the exception. Those exceptions do however suggest that we are fully capable of appalling brutality, we simply choose not to do so.

    We are wealthy and we are powerful and our backs are not against the wall. We can afford to act in a more gentle fashion. As western dominance fades that will become less and less true.

    I do not expect that we will ever become as vicious as the Muslim cultures because Islam essentially codifies that brutality and stamps it with theological approval, which Christianity does not do. That will likely never be the case in the West unless we become Muslims ourselves, or choose some form of cultural socialism…national, or international.

    Survival is the first order of business for any people or nation, and we will do whatever it takes to survive or we simply won’t survive. That can include some very ugly behavior and I do not believe we will shrink from doing these things in spite of how distasteful they may be.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ronnie Evil
    That power is fading and perhaps with it goes the illusion that we are all that much morally different than we fight.

    Wait a minute here: Please link or show where we the American Military in Iraq or Afghanistan

    1. Took prisoners of war put them in a cage and drowned them.
    2. Took prisoners of war put them in a cage and lit them on fire.
    3. Took prisoners of war and cut their hearts out and ate them.
    4. Systemically raided villages and towns and kidnapped, murdered, and raped all the women in town (I'm not talking isolated cases-while horrible-the one case that comes to mind at least two of them got life in prison for that).
    5. Taking prisoners of war and having mass executions in public chopping off a hundred people heads.
    6. Where we shot a boy for "disrespecting" the Bible.
    7. Where we shot a girl in the face for going to school.
    8. Where we stoned a woman for having an affair.
    9. Where we cut people's heads off for drug selling.
    10. Where we gave someone ten thousand lashes for talking bad about the government.

    Are you seeing a pattern yet? War is hell is a cliche and droning everyone in sight is a technological privilege that very few have-and their use can and is allowed to be debated. But to suggest that we of the West are no different than the Muslims we are fighting is patently absurd. And I did not just use Isis examples either: these were cases from Saudi, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, and Syria. We rage and rage when a convicted murderer and rapist gets due process, is convicted, gets 20 years of appeals, and then is finally exectued by essentially being put to sleep. These guys executed a boy for "dissing" the koran and then they went to work on him by driving over his body, with the townspeople taking part. There is NO comparison between us and them.

    Two big differences, Ronnie Evil:

    1. WE are operating on their territory. They are not operating on our territory.

    Furthermore, USA presence on their territory is based on a lie: it is illegitimate.

    No enemy has waged war on US soil in over a hundred years. Americans don’t know what war means. They have no experience of a glorious shock-and-awe campaign that destroys THEIR homes, churches, monuments, cultural heritage. It has not happened to the people of the USA in all of their lives.

    How many DPU-polluted Fallujahs have the Iraqis created in the outskirts of your American hometown, asshole? How many American children have been born with two heads where their arms should be, because that not-morally-equivalent USA wrecked their aquifers, their agricultural land, and destroyed their hospitals and sent their doctors into exile to boot?

    Americans haven’t seen their children starve to death as a result of some evil alien force coming to the USA and blockading our ports, crippling our economy, STUXNETing our technological infrastructure, killing our young scientists.

    2. Your righteous anger at the evil deeds of all those people whose lands the USA has wrongfully invaded and despoiled — what is that supposed to prove? That you have the capacity to be a cherry-picking asshole? Job done.
    Are you really that blinded with jingoistic fervor that you do not recognize that in the good ole USA we lynched people not that long ago; Emmet Till was beaten to a pulp for whistling at a white woman. Mothers have drowned their babies and men have serially raped boys, and yes, monsters have eaten human organs, all in the good old USA.

    I actually have more respect for warriors who chop off heads than for joy-stick genocidaires who do their bit for god and glory in air conditioned comfort then go home to the wife and kids, toss back a brew and top it off with a screw. Head choppers actually confront the moral dilemma of taking a life; joystick warriors have the courage of the knife but not of the blood.

    Moral equivalence indeed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sharrukin

    Treating entire populations of nation states as if they were armed citadel under siege is madness.
     
    It can be. It can also be what works.

    There is also a penalty to be paid for losing wars. Ask the Native Americans about what that penalty can encompass. It is foolish to assume that such things are impossible in the modern age given that Prussia was once German, Israel was once Arab, and California was once Anglo.

    Not every war is like this. Indeed most are not. However, if you preclude yourself from acting in such a way under any circumstances you have essentially signed your own death warrant if push comes to shove.

    Civilization found ways to fight wars without involving every last Tom, Dick, Harry, and their wives and children.
     
    Civilization is losing to the Muslim invaders who do fight wars the old ways.

    We slipped at some point back into barbarism–wherein killing all the males and raping all the women was the end goal of warfare–because people were tricked into thinking any war is All War.
     
    Perhaps, or perhaps we were tricked into thinking that wars without tears were a possibility, and that our power would forever allow us to act in a humane fashion despite the conduct of our enemies. That power is fading and perhaps with it goes the illusion that we are all that much morally different than those we fight.

    That power is fading and perhaps with it goes the illusion that we are all that much morally different than we fight.

    Wait a minute here: Please link or show where we the American Military in Iraq or Afghanistan

    1. Took prisoners of war put them in a cage and drowned them.
    2. Took prisoners of war put them in a cage and lit them on fire.
    3. Took prisoners of war and cut their hearts out and ate them.
    4. Systemically raided villages and towns and kidnapped, murdered, and raped all the women in town (I’m not talking isolated cases-while horrible-the one case that comes to mind at least two of them got life in prison for that).
    5. Taking prisoners of war and having mass executions in public chopping off a hundred people heads.
    6. Where we shot a boy for “disrespecting” the Bible.
    7. Where we shot a girl in the face for going to school.
    8. Where we stoned a woman for having an affair.
    9. Where we cut people’s heads off for drug selling.
    10. Where we gave someone ten thousand lashes for talking bad about the government.

    Are you seeing a pattern yet? War is hell is a cliche and droning everyone in sight is a technological privilege that very few have-and their use can and is allowed to be debated. But to suggest that we of the West are no different than the Muslims we are fighting is patently absurd. And I did not just use Isis examples either: these were cases from Saudi, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, and Syria. We rage and rage when a convicted murderer and rapist gets due process, is convicted, gets 20 years of appeals, and then is finally exectued by essentially being put to sleep. These guys executed a boy for “dissing” the koran and then they went to work on him by driving over his body, with the townspeople taking part. There is NO comparison between us and them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    Two big differences, Ronnie Evil:

    1. WE are operating on their territory. They are not operating on our territory.

    Furthermore, USA presence on their territory is based on a lie: it is illegitimate.

    No enemy has waged war on US soil in over a hundred years. Americans don't know what war means. They have no experience of a glorious shock-and-awe campaign that destroys THEIR homes, churches, monuments, cultural heritage. It has not happened to the people of the USA in all of their lives.

    How many DPU-polluted Fallujahs have the Iraqis created in the outskirts of your American hometown, asshole? How many American children have been born with two heads where their arms should be, because that not-morally-equivalent USA wrecked their aquifers, their agricultural land, and destroyed their hospitals and sent their doctors into exile to boot?

    Americans haven't seen their children starve to death as a result of some evil alien force coming to the USA and blockading our ports, crippling our economy, STUXNETing our technological infrastructure, killing our young scientists.

    2. Your righteous anger at the evil deeds of all those people whose lands the USA has wrongfully invaded and despoiled -- what is that supposed to prove? That you have the capacity to be a cherry-picking asshole? Job done.
    Are you really that blinded with jingoistic fervor that you do not recognize that in the good ole USA we lynched people not that long ago; Emmet Till was beaten to a pulp for whistling at a white woman. Mothers have drowned their babies and men have serially raped boys, and yes, monsters have eaten human organs, all in the good old USA.

    I actually have more respect for warriors who chop off heads than for joy-stick genocidaires who do their bit for god and glory in air conditioned comfort then go home to the wife and kids, toss back a brew and top it off with a screw. Head choppers actually confront the moral dilemma of taking a life; joystick warriors have the courage of the knife but not of the blood.

    Moral equivalence indeed.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous

    a program that originated under President George W. Bush as a crucial part of his “global war on terror,” and that was further institutionalized and ramped up under President Obama, will soon be bequeathed to a new president-elect.
     
    No, the program of killing civilians from the air did not originate with George W. Bush.

    It originated with Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

    Planning for the deliberate incineration of German civilians began in October 1938 (see Peter Moreira, Henry Morgenthau: The Jew who Defeated Hitler) when FDR and his Secretary of Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., made plans to acquire factories to build bombers.

    In 1939 Roosevelt issued an executive order authorizing the acquisition of property in the Utah desert where US Air Force, Standard Oil, Harvard architects including Erich Mendelsohn, "the Jewish architect," and Hollywood set designers later built German Village and Japanese village.

    They practiced bombing these exact replica buildings with the goal of producing a firestorm that would multiply itself and destroy the greatest expanse of urban infrastructure and destroy the maximum number of human lives.

    The furnishings specified by the Hollywood set designers included cribs, with the expectation that a young, working class German family with an infant would inhabit the residence the US Air Force intended to obliterate through its bombing campaign.

    The United States Department of the Interior has documented the purpose and design of German Village; it's here: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/master/pnp/habshaer/ut/ut0500/ut0568/data/ut0568data.pdf

    Furniture included an upholstered sofa (7); an upholstered easy chair (14); a settee
    (14); a kitchen buffet (7); . . . (28) ; a crib, with mattress and springs (14); a wicker chair (7) ;. . .Quantities reflected an understanding that some furnishings would be lost in the fires set by the incendiary tests, and would then be replaced in kind.

    In the bedroom, the single beds were placed together in pairs, with a crib adjacent, reflective of a young family with an infant.
    During preliminary penetration tests with dummy bombs all furnishings except the rugs were removed, with windows and doors closed (Standard Oil Development Company Specifications for Special Teat Furnishings April 1943; Standard Oil Development Company Inspection Report on Furnishings April 1943; T.D.M.R. No. 713 July 1943)
     
    In The Fog of War, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KSqnK_9WRA Robert McNamara repeats a conversation he had with Curtiss LeMay regarding US participation in the carpet bombing of Germany and Japan:

    LeMay said, "If we'd lost the war, we'd all have been prosecuted as war criminals." And I think he's right. He, and I'd say I, were behaving as war criminals. LeMay recognized that what he was doing would be thought immoral if his side had lost. But what makes it immoral if you lose and not immoral if you win? http://www.errolmorris.com/film/fow_transcript.html
     
    Consequent to US "winning" the war against Germany, it participated with other Allies, the USSR and Britain, in conducting the Nuremberg Trials, under which German, and only German, war fighters, leaders and even writers were tried, convicted and hanged or imprisoned.

    Shortly before his death, Harry Reicher explained to an audience at the Eisenhower Library

    an episode which occurred in the immediate aftermath of the Holocaust. While liberating concentration camps and witnessing sights that “beggar description,” General Eisenhower ensured the horrific scenes were captured for posterity in graphic photographs and film. Professor Reicher asserted that he grasped the impact which visual evidence was to have in the Nuremberg Trials, and foresaw the era of Holocaust denial. Video clips of concentration camps were shown.
    http://www.c-span.org/video/?297082-1/general-eisenhower-documentation-holocaust
     
    Reicher noted that Eisenhower employed Hollywood film crews to enter Ohrdruf camp, before even the Red Cross, and film the dead and dying there. Reicher emphasizes that the deeply "disturbing" content of that film and the emotional reaction it aroused throughout the world formed the major and most damning evidence against the German defendants and was also responsible for the harsh treatment meted out to the German people, under the Morgenthau plan, for over two years after Germany's surrender, until George Marshall said Enough.

    In other words, the Jewish film studio set designers who created German Village where methods were perfected to kill German infants were the same Jewish film makers who produced the graphic images used to condemn Germans at Nuremberg and beyond. Several of those Jewish film makers who took those images appear in in a docu-video Imaginary Witness: Hollywood and the Holocaust,

    I am not aware if those same Jewish film makers recorded the results of the US and British firebombing of the 131 German cities and the (estimated) 600,000 German people who were incinerated, or of the 60 Japanese cities and the more than 250,000 Japanese civilians who were wiped out by acts that McNamara and LeMay concede were "war crimes" but for which the United States has never been called to account.

    Because the American people and their leaders have never come to grips with the war crimes committed in their name in World War II, those criminal acts have been repeated. Indeed, they have become a celebrated frame of reference.

    Jeffrey Engel has examined the process by which George H. W. Bush made the decision to invade Iraq in 1990 - 1991. Engel sets the context for that decision: the Berlin wall had just toppled; Gorbachev and Bush were on close speaking terms; the United States was the sole superpower, and George H W Bush was president in a unipolar moment.

    Engel reported that Gorbachev "pestered" Bush with phone calls urging him not to intervene militarily in the conflict, and also acknowledged that Arab leaders pleaded with Bush to restrain himself, that the Arabs understood Saddam and were capable of resolving the conflict on their own terms in their own way. Although Engel does not explore this scenario, it is a fact that the late Jack O'Connell, who had been CIA station chief in Jordan and then became friends with and counselor to Jordan's King Hussein. In that role, O'Connell and the Jordanian monarch negotiated an arrangement to which Saddam agreed, that would have resolved the Iraq-Kuwait conflict nonviolently.

    George H. W. Bush rejected all of those overtures.

    To explain why Bush was insistent upon invading Iraq, Engel said:

    "I argue Bush took the dramatic step into the Gulf Crisis because he saw it as a bridge to a better world. His New World Order, a phrase unveiled in response to Hussein’s invasion, was not just a catchy phrase; ; it was rather the culmination of a long and difficult journey of intellectual discovery. . . .
    Bush recognized that the end of the Cold War eliminated the most stable aspects of the international system since 1945 . . . During the Spring and Summer of 1990 Bush told Global leaders that their alliances required an enemy to survive. In his words the new enemy was instability itself. . . .
    Bush saw in the Gulf War an opportunity as well as an invasion, a point that I will make by way of conclusion. .. He saw within it a chance to demonstrate that Washington would continue to lead, leading it in particular towards the kind of world promised to His generation as their reward for service in World War II. . . .He said, . . . quote “The prospect of a global peace continues to depend on an American forward presence. End quote.
     
    The supposed triumph of the United States in World War II is the inflection point and the reference point for all subsequent U S foreign policy decisions. As Engel's argument, above, states, Bush's beliefs about US vis a vis World War II were the critical factor in the Persian Gulf war.

    Bombing weddings is not new to the American people. They have been taught to celebrate killing other people's children over the course of the last 70 years and more -- for most of us, our entire lives.

    We did it to the German and Japanese people and called ourselves righteous.

    Jews, who were at the forefront of the destruction of Germany, have claimed for themselves the exclusive mantle of victimhood, thereby simultaneously erecting a barrier against any genuine American soul-searching, and sucking all of the oxygen out of air.

    It is a moral imperative that the people of the United States deny the holocaust; that is, confront the truth of who-did-what-to-whom and why, in the World Wars, that event that was the inflection point for American history. If you feel compelled to bomb something, target holocaust museums/liar's factories, or turn them into something useful like skating rinks or shooting galleries.

    Tell the truth.
    Beg forgiveness.
    Make reparations.
    Mend your ways.

    Stop killing people and calling it virtue.





    PS Reg Caesar summed up this lengthy cri de cœur in about 30 words here: http://www.unz.com/imercer/making-america-great-means-exposing-w/#comment-1343943

    Most major countries who expected they might participate in the next war, or who anticipated their interests might draw them in, planned for many likely eventualities. That’s how you plan. If you do it well enough in advance it might help you win. It’s a lot smarter than just making it up as you go. The US also planned what armored warfare in Europe might be like, and what naval war in the Pacific might demand. Not doing these things before the war would have been stupid, even for countries that would have tried to stay out.

    Most of them expected to both bomb other countries and be bombed in turn. The US didn’t have much to worry on that latter count. Japan did, but didn’t plan well enough for it.

    Countries that planned to bomb [US, Japan], to be bombed [France, somewhat], or to both bomb and be bombed [Britain, Germany, Russia, Italy [though they didn't do too much on defense] ] saw their plans tested 1939-45.

    The Germans did medium well on offense- they had planned for strategic bombing but their force structure was more configured for tactical support and for terror bombing of defenceless cities only ahead of the advancing army. They weren’t configured for offense on either a sustained basis or against really serious air defenses. The only really long-range bomber was not built for bomb load or self-defense. Their fighters were short range. But they most certainly had not only planned to bomb enemy cities, they had done it in Spain for Franco.

    The British and the US planned better and had better planes for it, at least by 1941-2.

    Considering that most of these countries openly discussed the idea of strategic bombing, with themselves as both offensive and defensive participants, in the 1930s, in both official and public contexts, and tried to prepare their people openly in many cases, it is not surprising that such planning was going on. Besides, all of those same countries pretty well took the view that nothing in international law forbade it. And nothing specific did. That’s why it had to be outlawed after the war.

    Whatever else might be said of all that, there was certainly nothing underhanded, conspiratorial, or unlawful about any of these prewar preparations.

    Indeed, and contrary to the modern drone war, the powers of the 1930s at least aimed to wait until an actual war was declared. That’s a high standard these days.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    I concede your broader argument, Random Observer: all parties planned and prepared for war. It is also the case the the British planned for an air war against civilians as early as 1920, after terror bombing of Iraqi villages (Arthur Harris was a squadron leader) produced such felicitous results for the British http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-29441383

    The BBC article linked above argues that "civilian bombing of Germany was unsuccessful and the (valiant) British bombers had to destroy Hitler's war machine."

    I believe the BBC is engaging in backward chronology: as noted above, http://www.unz.com/article/killing-someone-elses-beloved/#comment-1346149 American military leaders believed that the Wehrmacht was a spent force by December 1941; over a half-year earlier U S military personnel were sent to intensive training in preparation for the Allied Occupation of Germany.

    And yet it was 1942 before the U S Air Force began planning for the carpet bombing of German civilians, and according to the HAER document, German Village was constructed in 1943. http://www.unz.com/article/killing-someone-elses-beloved/#comment-1346149

    The Allies conducted their most lethal planning and preparation for an air war, specifically designed to and intended to kill working class German civilians, only after the German military had been, for all intents and purposes, laid low.

    Very early on Roosevelt had stated publicly that Germany was to be destroyed; no terms other than Unconditional Surrender would be acceptable.

    Roosevelt and Churchill employed that ugliest of all gangster tactics: they killed women and children in order to force the leadership to capitulate.

    (Allied firebombing did not destroy the Reichstag, nor the adjacent Opera House where the German government met during the war, the Reichstag having remained in its damaged state post-Reichstag fire in 1933. Nevertheless, Russians considered taking the Reichstag to be a symbolic coup d'grace and after fierce fighting took the building on May 2 1945, five days before Germany surrendered.)

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @annamaria
    "...why is it our job to prioritize their women and children over ours?"
    You mean, why the US State Dept. has been so eager to do "humanitarian" missions in the faraway lands?
    People in the US do not care about their children by allowing the silver-spooners (like Bush the lesser) and war profiteering psychopaths (see Cheney and his State dept., the weaponry producers, and the PNAC geniuses and such) to send our boys and girls to fight the wars of choice. During these wars, the locals have been killed in hundreds of thousands, whereas the survivors became inflamed with anti-US sentiments. - An understandable reaction from those whose parents and children were reduced to shredded meat. As for Yemen, it is the US' bosom ally, the Saudis that have been bombing there. "Human Rights Watch released a report Sunday providing new indications that Saudi Arabia has fired American-made cluster munitions, banned by international treaty, in civilian areas of Yemen..." http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/15/world/middleeast/new-report-of-us-made-cluster-bomb-use-by-saudis-in-yemen.html?_r=0

    With respect, the wording you quoted from the NYT: “…cluster munitions, banned by international treaty…” leaves the impression that the use of these weapons is a violation of international law. That’s not quite right.

    The terms of the “treaty” only become legally compulsory when a country signs and ratifies the treaty, and then pursuant to the terms of ratification, “activates” compliance on whatever date is specified in the ratification.

    Sadly, most of the great powers and many of the lesser powers have not signed onto the treaty. Among these are the US, Russia, Syria, and Saudi Arabia.

    So it’s more than a bit misleading to say that their use has been banned. Would that it were so.

    In the last few days, I’ve personally experienced the tragic death by suicide of a close family member. The waves of grief spreading among those who survive is devastating. Yet it is but a tiny droplet of grief compared to what is currently sweeping the world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Fred Z
    My German family and their friends had personal experience of this in April 1945 when the allies "terror bombed" Paderborn.

    They were unanimous in their comments to me that this bombing, even very late in the war, was not an evil and was necessary. They felt no ill will, no rancor, just regret at their own stupidity in having supported Hitler.

    Excellent!!

    They were unanimous in their comments to me that this bombing, even very late in the war, was not an evil and was necessary. They felt no ill will, no rancor, just regret at their own stupidity in having supported Hitler.

    All those years of brainwashing worked.

    Now, you Germans have your job cut out for you:

    You can form Manchurian Candidate brigades to convince the people of Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Gaza that

    this bombing, even very late in the war, was not an evil and was necessary. They felt no ill will, no rancor, just regret at their own stupidity in having supported Hitler Saddam, and Assad, and Qaddafi. and Nasrallah

    Excellent timing too; the hydrangeas will soon be in bloom

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous
    The Russians defeated the German military in the field without targeting German civilians. The Americans and British were the ones who liked doing that. Americans make exaggerated claims about their contribution to the ultimate victory. A read of Albert Speer's book shows how they were able to keep working even despite the western bombing campaign. From Indian removal to Sherman to the present the American way of war has been to attack the weak and vulnerable. Fighting underarmed third-worlders has been the American specialty as well as going after civilians. America has always embarked on the most cowardly and predatory of wars yet somehow they have the idea they're a nation of Rambos. Can't even defeat sandal wearing tribesmen with small arms so might as well take it out on the children and elderly family members of the resistance fighters; it's so much easier.

    re @ anonymous

    “In 1939 Roosevelt issued an executive order authorizing the acquisition of property in the Utah desert where US Air Force, Standard Oil, Harvard architects including Erich Mendelsohn, “the Jewish architect,” and Hollywood set designers later built German Village and Japanese village.

    that place in the Utah desert is Dugway.

    It’s where the Jewish man who invented the drone tested it:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/national-security/rise-of-the-drone-from-calif-garage-to-multibillion-dollar-defense-industry/2011/12/22/gIQACG8UEP_story.html

    In 1980, Abraham Karem, an engineer who had emigrated from Israel, retreated into his three-car garage in Hacienda Heights outside Los Angeles and. . .began to build an aircraft.

    . . .when Karem finished more than a year later, he wheeled into his driveway an odd, cigar-shaped craft that was destined to change the way the United States wages war.

    The Albatross, as it was called, was transported to the Dugway Proving Ground in Utah, where it demonstrated the ability to stay aloft safely for up to 56 hours — a very, very long time in what was then the crash-prone world of drones. . . .

    Just like that.

    Our kids used to build remote controlled airplanes in the basement. They were big, and beautiful, and you flew them with a joystick.
    Our kids tested those planes at a nearby baseball field.

    A guy from Israel tinkers in his garage and a year later he’s testing his overgrown remote controlled airplane at a massive US government facility where the US’s most lethal chemical and biological weapons have been developed and tested for decades.

    How to explain it? —>

    This booming sector has its roots in the often unsung persistence of engineering dreamers who worked on the technology of unmanned aviation when the military establishment and most major defense contractors had little or no interest in it. Innovators such as Karem were often sustained by grants from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and a handful of early believers, including the CIA.

    wonder why DARPA linked with an Israeli instead of someone like our kids to develop this billion dollar industry.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • US/NATO – Order of Battle

    1) ambush
    2) sneak attack
    3) backshooting
    4) bushwhacking
    5) terrorism

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • can you guys imagine a militarily superior country flying drones above our cities and killing people at will? jeez. the only option now is to never become weak militarily. damn, now that I think about it, it is all intentional and planned.

    Do you really think our leaders give a rats behind about “a militarily superior country flying drones above our cities and killing people at will”?

    I f you really beleieve we kill them in far away lands to be safer at home, you are blessed and innocent, and you must believe in Santa Claus and tooth fairy…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous says:

    March 6, 2016 at 3:28 am GMT

    The Russians defeated the German military in the field without targeting German civilians.

    They executed Polish officers in the Katyn Forest and deported between 300,000 to 700,000 Polish civilians. Between 150,000 and 500,000 Polish civilians were executed. The Volga Germans were deported as well, and all this before the Soviet could even get their hands on any German civilians because the war was taking place inside Soviet territory and they lacked any heavy bomber force.

    When they did get to Germany the civilian death toll was well over 500,000 killed and that doesn’t include the mass rapes carried out.

    Everybody targeted civilians during World War Two. Some more than others.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    utu --

    the link opens on the cover page which states that the doc was prepared by U S Department of the Interior as part of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) project -- the title suggests the purpose of the doc.

    don't know when it was written -- last 20 years is my guess.

    I assume that your question about the date, which guest corrected, was trying to get at whether the German - Japanese village project was undertaken before or after USA had been attacked and declared war/declared war upon, and that's an interesting question with a multi-part answer (devils & details being what they are).

    a. I didn't find a date in 1941 in the HAER doc.

    b. As noted in my comment, Roosevelt and Henry Morgenthau, Jr. met in Oct 1938 -- after Hitler and Chamberlain had negotiated the Munich agreement but before it was ratified, and before Herschel Grynszpan assassinated Ernst vom Rath which set off the night of broken glass -- they laid plans to acquire plants to manufacture bombers. Before 1941 USA was producing 15 000 bombers annually. That information is from Peter Moreira's "The Jew who Defeated Hitler: Henry Morgenthau, Jr. ..."

    c. Roosevelt signed an executive order in Jan. 1939 instructing the Army to acquire land and create a facility at Dugway to research and develop chemical and biological weapons against the possibility that Germany would use chemical weapons in a future war.

    d. from other study, I have learned that Erich Mendelsohn began work on German Village in mid-to- late 1942.

    So it appears that German and Japanese Villages were not built until after USA was involved in war with Germany and Japan.

    It is also true that military and political opinion among the Allies was clear: By Dec. 1941 Germany was a spent force; the Wehrmacht had been exhausted. Persons who participate in Pat Lang's blog http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2015/11/warlords.html#tpe-action-resize-367 -- many of them former national security, or CIA, or US military members, have stated that their fathers/uncles etc. who were in the military in WWII had been sent to deep immersion German language and culture courses in mid-1941 in preparation for US occupation of Germany when the Allies won the war, which was deemed inevitable. In a conversation at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in NYC in 2014, Martin Amis and Ron Rosenbaum agreed: Germany had been defeated by Dec. 1941 http://www.c-span.org/video/?322861-1/book-discussion-explaining-hitler-zone-interest

    If that is the case, then the campaign to firebomb Germany, with the stated intent of terrorizing civilians and even of killing "infants in their cribs," was a wanton and deliberate act of genocide. It did not serve a military purpose -- the enemy was already defeated.

    As I am typing this comment I am listening to John Kasich and Ted Cruz demand that the US military be unleashed and that they "carpet bomb the s%#t out of ISIS." Sean Hannity discussed this with both Kasich and Cruz; Hannity intoned, with hand to heart, "we are a compassionate nation, we are pro-life", but "collateral damage is inevitable; we have to defeat the enemy." Perhaps what was most amusing in a sick sort of way is that Hannity, Kasich, and Cruz were skittish about saying "shit," substituting a rhetorical blank space, but they had no qualms about demanding that an unknown number of other people's children be incinerated. The audience at the Convention Center in Oxen Hill, MD cheered wildly.

    I argue that this bloodlust is epigenetically twined in American DNA, having been expressed in the US Civil war, as guestt noted at #7; was wildly expressed, encouraged, applauded and unpunished in the firebombing campaigns of WWII; was even more egregiously expressed in Viet Nam, where USA dropped even more tonnage of bombs than were dropped on Japan.

    There is something sick in USA DNA; all of the major candidates for POTUS express more-or-less virulent strains of this sickness.

    Working Class's comment at #11. is worth emphasizing: If you participate in these crimes or applaud them or are indifferent to them you are in the service of evil.

    --
    If I remain silent I have sinned. -Mohammad Mosaddegh, Prime Minister of Iran 1951-53,

    You’re ascribing things that are common to humans in general and pretending that they are unique to Americans. This anti-American crap is such a silly cliche at this point. To hear some people tell it, nothing bad ever happened until America came along. Meanwhile, we never get thanked for all the great we’ve done. Go to hell, and your country with you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • it is too late to stop now anyway. and we have to keep our military as the #1 in the world or we will suffer the same fate as our current victims.

    not sure if this was intended, but there is no way out now. becoming a good guy is no longer an option when you have murdered and assassinated people at will all over the world.

    can you guys imagine a militarily superior country flying drones above our cities and killing people at will? jeez. the only option now is to never become weak militarily. damn, now that I think about it, it is all intentional and planned.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The Russians defeated the German military in the field without targeting German civilians. The Americans and British were the ones who liked doing that. Americans make exaggerated claims about their contribution to the ultimate victory. A read of Albert Speer’s book shows how they were able to keep working even despite the western bombing campaign. From Indian removal to Sherman to the present the American way of war has been to attack the weak and vulnerable. Fighting underarmed third-worlders has been the American specialty as well as going after civilians. America has always embarked on the most cowardly and predatory of wars yet somehow they have the idea they’re a nation of Rambos. Can’t even defeat sandal wearing tribesmen with small arms so might as well take it out on the children and elderly family members of the resistance fighters; it’s so much easier.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous

    re @ anonymous

    "In 1939 Roosevelt issued an executive order authorizing the acquisition of property in the Utah desert where US Air Force, Standard Oil, Harvard architects including Erich Mendelsohn, “the Jewish architect,” and Hollywood set designers later built German Village and Japanese village.
     

    that place in the Utah desert is Dugway.

    It's where the Jewish man who invented the drone tested it:


    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/national-security/rise-of-the-drone-from-calif-garage-to-multibillion-dollar-defense-industry/2011/12/22/gIQACG8UEP_story.html

    In 1980, Abraham Karem, an engineer who had emigrated from Israel, retreated into his three-car garage in Hacienda Heights outside Los Angeles and. . .began to build an aircraft.

    . . .when Karem finished more than a year later, he wheeled into his driveway an odd, cigar-shaped craft that was destined to change the way the United States wages war.

    The Albatross, as it was called, was transported to the Dugway Proving Ground in Utah, where it demonstrated the ability to stay aloft safely for up to 56 hours — a very, very long time in what was then the crash-prone world of drones. . . .
     

    Just like that.


    Our kids used to build remote controlled airplanes in the basement. They were big, and beautiful, and you flew them with a joystick.
    Our kids tested those planes at a nearby baseball field.

    A guy from Israel tinkers in his garage and a year later he's testing his overgrown remote controlled airplane at a massive US government facility where the US's most lethal chemical and biological weapons have been developed and tested for decades.

    How to explain it? --->

    This booming sector has its roots in the often unsung persistence of engineering dreamers who worked on the technology of unmanned aviation when the military establishment and most major defense contractors had little or no interest in it. Innovators such as Karem were often sustained by grants from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and a handful of early believers, including the CIA.
     

    wonder why DARPA linked with an Israeli instead of someone like our kids to develop this billion dollar industry.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “U.S. airpower has hit a bunch of other weddings, too. And funerals. And clinics. And an unknown and unknowable number of family homes. ”
    Unknown to us, but not unknown to God. And punishment is inescapable, too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Treating entire populations of nation states as if they were armed citadel under siege is madness.

    It can be. It can also be what works.

    There is also a penalty to be paid for losing wars. Ask the Native Americans about what that penalty can encompass. It is foolish to assume that such things are impossible in the modern age given that Prussia was once German, Israel was once Arab, and California was once Anglo.

    Not every war is like this. Indeed most are not. However, if you preclude yourself from acting in such a way under any circumstances you have essentially signed your own death warrant if push comes to shove.

    Civilization found ways to fight wars without involving every last Tom, Dick, Harry, and their wives and children.

    Civilization is losing to the Muslim invaders who do fight wars the old ways.

    We slipped at some point back into barbarism–wherein killing all the males and raping all the women was the end goal of warfare–because people were tricked into thinking any war is All War.

    Perhaps, or perhaps we were tricked into thinking that wars without tears were a possibility, and that our power would forever allow us to act in a humane fashion despite the conduct of our enemies. That power is fading and perhaps with it goes the illusion that we are all that much morally different than those we fight.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronnie Evil
    That power is fading and perhaps with it goes the illusion that we are all that much morally different than we fight.

    Wait a minute here: Please link or show where we the American Military in Iraq or Afghanistan

    1. Took prisoners of war put them in a cage and drowned them.
    2. Took prisoners of war put them in a cage and lit them on fire.
    3. Took prisoners of war and cut their hearts out and ate them.
    4. Systemically raided villages and towns and kidnapped, murdered, and raped all the women in town (I'm not talking isolated cases-while horrible-the one case that comes to mind at least two of them got life in prison for that).
    5. Taking prisoners of war and having mass executions in public chopping off a hundred people heads.
    6. Where we shot a boy for "disrespecting" the Bible.
    7. Where we shot a girl in the face for going to school.
    8. Where we stoned a woman for having an affair.
    9. Where we cut people's heads off for drug selling.
    10. Where we gave someone ten thousand lashes for talking bad about the government.

    Are you seeing a pattern yet? War is hell is a cliche and droning everyone in sight is a technological privilege that very few have-and their use can and is allowed to be debated. But to suggest that we of the West are no different than the Muslims we are fighting is patently absurd. And I did not just use Isis examples either: these were cases from Saudi, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, and Syria. We rage and rage when a convicted murderer and rapist gets due process, is convicted, gets 20 years of appeals, and then is finally exectued by essentially being put to sleep. These guys executed a boy for "dissing" the koran and then they went to work on him by driving over his body, with the townspeople taking part. There is NO comparison between us and them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Art says:

    We cannot kill our way to peace! We need to STOP the killing.

    We are the big boys – we are supposed to be the responsible party in this mess. Responsible people do not covertly kill.

    Obtaining information is good and necessary – not respecting the sovereignty of other nations is bad.

    Covert action is war – the CIA is making war on all these nations without the express consent of congress to make war.

    This must end — period.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @biz
    People in Yemen and Afghanistan don't care about their own women and children, so these are crocodile tears on their part. They cover their women in trash bags and marry off their children to cousins before puberty. If they don't care about their own women and children, why is it our job to prioritize their women and children over ours?

    What do our women and children have to do with it?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sharrukin
    Civilians have always been killed in wars since the dawn of time. Technology has given us drones but it hasn't really altered that basic fact. Western populations are one of the few who feel any great deal of guilt over this truth. Most other cultures don't really care that much. African cultures certainly don't care, nor do Muslims.

    Nations are people. Nations go to war with one another and the populace of those nations are targeted, sometimes deliberately, and sometimes as collateral damage.

    I don't think there has ever been a war in which innocents didn't die. Western militaries go out of their way to avoid civilian casualties, but when all is said and done, they cannot be completely avoided. So don't go to war unless it really matters.

    There’s a difference between innocents dying and having a deliberate policy of killing them on purpose. Treating entire populations of nation states as if they were armed citadel under siege is madness. Civilization found ways to fight wars without involving every last Tom, Dick, Harry, and their wives and children.

    We slipped at some point back into barbarism–wherein killing all the males and raping all the women was the end goal of warfare–because people were tricked into thinking any war is All War. Like that idiotic Sherman quote, “War is hell,” which makes people forget that even hell had gradations. It was all the same level of suffering all the way through, at least in Dante. Sons who murdered their own father’s weren’t in the same circle as those who didn’t keep the Sabbath.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Reg Cæsar
    Did they feel any guilt for bombing Coventry?

    Tit for tat.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Reg Cæsar

    we should trace it back to William Tecumseh Sherman
     
    ...whose men cried, "Remember Chambersburg!" Sherman was not an innovator.

    If you’ll notice, I wrote that there was nothing new about killing civilians. What’s different about Sherman is that it was sanctioned at the highest level, and disregarding the rules of engagement became official or quasi-official policy. It was our first non-Indian Total War, directly imitated partly by the Boer War and by the totally insane world wars.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    utu --

    the link opens on the cover page which states that the doc was prepared by U S Department of the Interior as part of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) project -- the title suggests the purpose of the doc.

    don't know when it was written -- last 20 years is my guess.

    I assume that your question about the date, which guest corrected, was trying to get at whether the German - Japanese village project was undertaken before or after USA had been attacked and declared war/declared war upon, and that's an interesting question with a multi-part answer (devils & details being what they are).

    a. I didn't find a date in 1941 in the HAER doc.

    b. As noted in my comment, Roosevelt and Henry Morgenthau, Jr. met in Oct 1938 -- after Hitler and Chamberlain had negotiated the Munich agreement but before it was ratified, and before Herschel Grynszpan assassinated Ernst vom Rath which set off the night of broken glass -- they laid plans to acquire plants to manufacture bombers. Before 1941 USA was producing 15 000 bombers annually. That information is from Peter Moreira's "The Jew who Defeated Hitler: Henry Morgenthau, Jr. ..."

    c. Roosevelt signed an executive order in Jan. 1939 instructing the Army to acquire land and create a facility at Dugway to research and develop chemical and biological weapons against the possibility that Germany would use chemical weapons in a future war.

    d. from other study, I have learned that Erich Mendelsohn began work on German Village in mid-to- late 1942.

    So it appears that German and Japanese Villages were not built until after USA was involved in war with Germany and Japan.

    It is also true that military and political opinion among the Allies was clear: By Dec. 1941 Germany was a spent force; the Wehrmacht had been exhausted. Persons who participate in Pat Lang's blog http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2015/11/warlords.html#tpe-action-resize-367 -- many of them former national security, or CIA, or US military members, have stated that their fathers/uncles etc. who were in the military in WWII had been sent to deep immersion German language and culture courses in mid-1941 in preparation for US occupation of Germany when the Allies won the war, which was deemed inevitable. In a conversation at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in NYC in 2014, Martin Amis and Ron Rosenbaum agreed: Germany had been defeated by Dec. 1941 http://www.c-span.org/video/?322861-1/book-discussion-explaining-hitler-zone-interest

    If that is the case, then the campaign to firebomb Germany, with the stated intent of terrorizing civilians and even of killing "infants in their cribs," was a wanton and deliberate act of genocide. It did not serve a military purpose -- the enemy was already defeated.

    As I am typing this comment I am listening to John Kasich and Ted Cruz demand that the US military be unleashed and that they "carpet bomb the s%#t out of ISIS." Sean Hannity discussed this with both Kasich and Cruz; Hannity intoned, with hand to heart, "we are a compassionate nation, we are pro-life", but "collateral damage is inevitable; we have to defeat the enemy." Perhaps what was most amusing in a sick sort of way is that Hannity, Kasich, and Cruz were skittish about saying "shit," substituting a rhetorical blank space, but they had no qualms about demanding that an unknown number of other people's children be incinerated. The audience at the Convention Center in Oxen Hill, MD cheered wildly.

    I argue that this bloodlust is epigenetically twined in American DNA, having been expressed in the US Civil war, as guestt noted at #7; was wildly expressed, encouraged, applauded and unpunished in the firebombing campaigns of WWII; was even more egregiously expressed in Viet Nam, where USA dropped even more tonnage of bombs than were dropped on Japan.

    There is something sick in USA DNA; all of the major candidates for POTUS express more-or-less virulent strains of this sickness.

    Working Class's comment at #11. is worth emphasizing: If you participate in these crimes or applaud them or are indifferent to them you are in the service of evil.

    --
    If I remain silent I have sinned. -Mohammad Mosaddegh, Prime Minister of Iran 1951-53,

    Death From Above is magical to imperialists. They can’t get enough of it. Solves all life’s problems. There is literally no foreign policy problem that can’t be solved by bombing the hell out of them, whoever they may be.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Rehmat
    Sadly, it's not Donald Trump who believes in the mass killing of innocent people as "collateral damage" while hunting down people waging military campaign against occupiers of their lands - demonized as "terrorists" by the western imperialists.

    Take for example, the United states and Israel, whom Noam Chomsky has labeled as "world's top terrorist states". For these two "terrorist states", Hamas and Hizbullah are "terrorist organizations" because they're fight the US-Israel terrorism on daily basis.

    After John Kerry's visit to Israel (Ha’aretz, November 27, 2015) senior officials from Israel Occupation Force (IOF) and internal security Shin Bet warned the Zionist regime’s national security team that their Palestinian Gandhi, Mahmoud Abbas, ruled Palestinian Authority (PA) is about to collapse soon.

    In the wake of the above mentioned warning, Congressman, Jim McGovern, a long-time and steadfast supporter of 'Israel has the right to exist myth', called on Netanyahu to start talking to Gaza ruling Islamic resistance Hamas in order to revive the so-called two-state solution.

    Jim McGovern, a Democrat who co-chairs the influential 'Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission' – named after Jewish Rep. Tom Lantos (d. 2008). He was in London to receive an accolade at the 'Sergei Magnitsky Human Rights Awards' – said he is a staunch supporter of Israel and supports the US-Iran nuclear agreement because it would be good for Israel in long-term.....

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/11/28/rep-mcgovern-only-hamas-can-guarantee-israels-security/

    This Tom Lantos? Of Iraq fame? So human rights!

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2003/02/15/the-lies-of-tom-lantos/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @biz
    People in Yemen and Afghanistan don't care about their own women and children, so these are crocodile tears on their part. They cover their women in trash bags and marry off their children to cousins before puberty. If they don't care about their own women and children, why is it our job to prioritize their women and children over ours?

    “…why is it our job to prioritize their women and children over ours?”
    You mean, why the US State Dept. has been so eager to do “humanitarian” missions in the faraway lands?
    People in the US do not care about their children by allowing the silver-spooners (like Bush the lesser) and war profiteering psychopaths (see Cheney and his State dept., the weaponry producers, and the PNAC geniuses and such) to send our boys and girls to fight the wars of choice. During these wars, the locals have been killed in hundreds of thousands, whereas the survivors became inflamed with anti-US sentiments. – An understandable reaction from those whose parents and children were reduced to shredded meat. As for Yemen, it is the US’ bosom ally, the Saudis that have been bombing there. “Human Rights Watch released a report Sunday providing new indications that Saudi Arabia has fired American-made cluster munitions, banned by international treaty, in civilian areas of Yemen…” http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/15/world/middleeast/new-report-of-us-made-cluster-bomb-use-by-saudis-in-yemen.html?_r=0

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Davis
    With respect, the wording you quoted from the NYT: "...cluster munitions, banned by international treaty..." leaves the impression that the use of these weapons is a violation of international law. That's not quite right.

    The terms of the "treaty" only become legally compulsory when a country signs and ratifies the treaty, and then pursuant to the terms of ratification, "activates" compliance on whatever date is specified in the ratification.

    Sadly, most of the great powers and many of the lesser powers have not signed onto the treaty. Among these are the US, Russia, Syria, and Saudi Arabia.

    So it's more than a bit misleading to say that their use has been banned. Would that it were so.

    In the last few days, I've personally experienced the tragic death by suicide of a close family member. The waves of grief spreading among those who survive is devastating. Yet it is but a tiny droplet of grief compared to what is currently sweeping the world.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • More anti-Trump FUD, and it’s STILL not working.

    Grow up. Trump won’t kill innocent women and children.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • utu says:
    @anonymous
    utu --

    the link opens on the cover page which states that the doc was prepared by U S Department of the Interior as part of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) project -- the title suggests the purpose of the doc.

    don't know when it was written -- last 20 years is my guess.

    I assume that your question about the date, which guest corrected, was trying to get at whether the German - Japanese village project was undertaken before or after USA had been attacked and declared war/declared war upon, and that's an interesting question with a multi-part answer (devils & details being what they are).

    a. I didn't find a date in 1941 in the HAER doc.

    b. As noted in my comment, Roosevelt and Henry Morgenthau, Jr. met in Oct 1938 -- after Hitler and Chamberlain had negotiated the Munich agreement but before it was ratified, and before Herschel Grynszpan assassinated Ernst vom Rath which set off the night of broken glass -- they laid plans to acquire plants to manufacture bombers. Before 1941 USA was producing 15 000 bombers annually. That information is from Peter Moreira's "The Jew who Defeated Hitler: Henry Morgenthau, Jr. ..."

    c. Roosevelt signed an executive order in Jan. 1939 instructing the Army to acquire land and create a facility at Dugway to research and develop chemical and biological weapons against the possibility that Germany would use chemical weapons in a future war.

    d. from other study, I have learned that Erich Mendelsohn began work on German Village in mid-to- late 1942.

    So it appears that German and Japanese Villages were not built until after USA was involved in war with Germany and Japan.

    It is also true that military and political opinion among the Allies was clear: By Dec. 1941 Germany was a spent force; the Wehrmacht had been exhausted. Persons who participate in Pat Lang's blog http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2015/11/warlords.html#tpe-action-resize-367 -- many of them former national security, or CIA, or US military members, have stated that their fathers/uncles etc. who were in the military in WWII had been sent to deep immersion German language and culture courses in mid-1941 in preparation for US occupation of Germany when the Allies won the war, which was deemed inevitable. In a conversation at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in NYC in 2014, Martin Amis and Ron Rosenbaum agreed: Germany had been defeated by Dec. 1941 http://www.c-span.org/video/?322861-1/book-discussion-explaining-hitler-zone-interest

    If that is the case, then the campaign to firebomb Germany, with the stated intent of terrorizing civilians and even of killing "infants in their cribs," was a wanton and deliberate act of genocide. It did not serve a military purpose -- the enemy was already defeated.

    As I am typing this comment I am listening to John Kasich and Ted Cruz demand that the US military be unleashed and that they "carpet bomb the s%#t out of ISIS." Sean Hannity discussed this with both Kasich and Cruz; Hannity intoned, with hand to heart, "we are a compassionate nation, we are pro-life", but "collateral damage is inevitable; we have to defeat the enemy." Perhaps what was most amusing in a sick sort of way is that Hannity, Kasich, and Cruz were skittish about saying "shit," substituting a rhetorical blank space, but they had no qualms about demanding that an unknown number of other people's children be incinerated. The audience at the Convention Center in Oxen Hill, MD cheered wildly.

    I argue that this bloodlust is epigenetically twined in American DNA, having been expressed in the US Civil war, as guestt noted at #7; was wildly expressed, encouraged, applauded and unpunished in the firebombing campaigns of WWII; was even more egregiously expressed in Viet Nam, where USA dropped even more tonnage of bombs than were dropped on Japan.

    There is something sick in USA DNA; all of the major candidates for POTUS express more-or-less virulent strains of this sickness.

    Working Class's comment at #11. is worth emphasizing: If you participate in these crimes or applaud them or are indifferent to them you are in the service of evil.

    --
    If I remain silent I have sinned. -Mohammad Mosaddegh, Prime Minister of Iran 1951-53,

    “I argue that this bloodlust is epigenetically twined in American DNA” – More I learn of American history and more I hear or read past and present utterances by common and not common (politicians) Americans I begin to believe that you are right. City on the Hill, New Jerusalem, Manifest Destiny are memes through which this bloodlust was epigenetically spread. I think it all goes to the Old Testament, the oldest manual for genocide, that American Protestants adopted as their own book seeing themselves as being the new Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Isn’t it sad (but good to hear that even a Trump has more sense than the two party establishment) that Donald Trump is the only one of all candidates to say that the administration lied us into a mistaken war, and that the other wars in the Middle East are equally as bad, that he wants to be even-handed rather than one-sided in the Israel/Palestinian conflict, that he wants to cooperate with Russia rather than make war with them? And that instead of four or five trillion (the only honest assessment) being squandered on wars and regime change, it ought to have been spent on infrastructure and rebuilding peacetime industry for folks here at home?

    And sadder still that Bernie’s now got zero chance against Hillary, whom the neocons have made plain they are defecting to (although it means they are rejecting anyone in any party who they can’t control.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Civilians have always been killed in wars since the dawn of time. Technology has given us drones but it hasn’t really altered that basic fact. Western populations are one of the few who feel any great deal of guilt over this truth. Most other cultures don’t really care that much. African cultures certainly don’t care, nor do Muslims.

    Nations are people. Nations go to war with one another and the populace of those nations are targeted, sometimes deliberately, and sometimes as collateral damage.

    I don’t think there has ever been a war in which innocents didn’t die. Western militaries go out of their way to avoid civilian casualties, but when all is said and done, they cannot be completely avoided. So don’t go to war unless it really matters.

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    There's a difference between innocents dying and having a deliberate policy of killing them on purpose. Treating entire populations of nation states as if they were armed citadel under siege is madness. Civilization found ways to fight wars without involving every last Tom, Dick, Harry, and their wives and children.

    We slipped at some point back into barbarism--wherein killing all the males and raping all the women was the end goal of warfare--because people were tricked into thinking any war is All War. Like that idiotic Sherman quote, "War is hell," which makes people forget that even hell had gradations. It was all the same level of suffering all the way through, at least in Dante. Sons who murdered their own father's weren't in the same circle as those who didn't keep the Sabbath.
    , @Anonymous
    Who in Hell are you to know what other cultures think or care about? You have never met or known anyone personally from another culture. I know this because of what you've written.

    I'm an American. I've lived in the Middle East and the Far East. I know people from many cultures and religions. They are actually people, too. Imagine that. They are humans, and they have lived in their homelands longer than America has been a country -- much longer.

    They also have families they love as much as you love yours (I suppose you love your family)

    So, you obviously aren't a Christian, nor do you associate with any other religion I'm guessing, since no person in touch with his spiritual self would think what you think.

    You're a sad specimen of our species.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @guest
    I don't see deliberately killing civilians from the air as fundamentally different than killing them on the ground, so we should trace it back to William Tecumseh Sherman. For armies had ignored other armies and fought unarmed people instead (which is easier, don't ya know) before, despite rules against it. But I don't think that before in U.S. history did the highest level of power respond to lawlessness with, "Ah, who cares?"

    Except with the Injuns, obviously, but did the rules apply to red men? Those wars were Total Wars from the get-go, whereas the war against the states (i.e. not red people) had to build up a head of steam first.

    so we should trace it back to William Tecumseh Sherman

    …whose men would cry, “Remember Chambersburg!” Sherman was not an innovator.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Fred Z
    My German family and their friends had personal experience of this in April 1945 when the allies "terror bombed" Paderborn.

    They were unanimous in their comments to me that this bombing, even very late in the war, was not an evil and was necessary. They felt no ill will, no rancor, just regret at their own stupidity in having supported Hitler.

    The nations with the technological capacity to conquer nature are also best equipped to conquer other peoples who exist at the mercy of nature. And once the primitive enemy was defeated, the British carried out their moral obligation to instruct him in the ways of modern civilization, especially the acquisition of technological benefits. Churchill was hugely proud of the civilizing mission essential to British empire-building.

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

    I keep reading about ‘civilization’, especially ‘western civilization’ here and in the comments.
    Is there any evidence whatever that evolution gives a flying fuck about ‘civilization’? I rather think the evidence is to the contrary. Civilization protects evolutionary losers. That can only go on so long.

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/sweden-the-fix-is-in/#comment-814896

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Fred Z
    My German family and their friends had personal experience of this in April 1945 when the allies "terror bombed" Paderborn.

    They were unanimous in their comments to me that this bombing, even very late in the war, was not an evil and was necessary. They felt no ill will, no rancor, just regret at their own stupidity in having supported Hitler.

    Did they feel any guilt for bombing Coventry?

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    Tit for tat.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @guest
    I don't see deliberately killing civilians from the air as fundamentally different than killing them on the ground, so we should trace it back to William Tecumseh Sherman. For armies had ignored other armies and fought unarmed people instead (which is easier, don't ya know) before, despite rules against it. But I don't think that before in U.S. history did the highest level of power respond to lawlessness with, "Ah, who cares?"

    Except with the Injuns, obviously, but did the rules apply to red men? Those wars were Total Wars from the get-go, whereas the war against the states (i.e. not red people) had to build up a head of steam first.

    we should trace it back to William Tecumseh Sherman

    …whose men cried, “Remember Chambersburg!” Sherman was not an innovator.

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    If you'll notice, I wrote that there was nothing new about killing civilians. What's different about Sherman is that it was sanctioned at the highest level, and disregarding the rules of engagement became official or quasi-official policy. It was our first non-Indian Total War, directly imitated partly by the Boer War and by the totally insane world wars.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @utu
    I looked at the link you gave about the German-Japanese village they built in Utah. Who wrote this document and when? For what purpose? Where in the document it is stated that the village was built before Nov. 7 1941?

    utu –

    the link opens on the cover page which states that the doc was prepared by U S Department of the Interior as part of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) project — the title suggests the purpose of the doc.

    don’t know when it was written — last 20 years is my guess.

    I assume that your question about the date, which guest corrected, was trying to get at whether the German – Japanese village project was undertaken before or after USA had been attacked and declared war/declared war upon, and that’s an interesting question with a multi-part answer (devils & details being what they are).

    a. I didn’t find a date in 1941 in the HAER doc.

    b. As noted in my comment, Roosevelt and Henry Morgenthau, Jr. met in Oct 1938 — after Hitler and Chamberlain had negotiated the Munich agreement but before it was ratified, and before Herschel Grynszpan assassinated Ernst vom Rath which set off the night of broken glass — they laid plans to acquire plants to manufacture bombers. Before 1941 USA was producing 15 000 bombers annually. That information is from Peter Moreira’s “The Jew who Defeated Hitler: Henry Morgenthau, Jr. …”

    c. Roosevelt signed an executive order in Jan. 1939 instructing the Army to acquire land and create a facility at Dugway to research and develop chemical and biological weapons against the possibility that Germany would use chemical weapons in a future war.

    d. from other study, I have learned that Erich Mendelsohn began work on German Village in mid-to- late 1942.

    So it appears that German and Japanese Villages were not built until after USA was involved in war with Germany and Japan.

    It is also true that military and political opinion among the Allies was clear: By Dec. 1941 Germany was a spent force; the Wehrmacht had been exhausted. Persons who participate in Pat Lang’s blog http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2015/11/warlords.html#tpe-action-resize-367 — many of them former national security, or CIA, or US military members, have stated that their fathers/uncles etc. who were in the military in WWII had been sent to deep immersion German language and culture courses in mid-1941 in preparation for US occupation of Germany when the Allies won the war, which was deemed inevitable. In a conversation at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in NYC in 2014, Martin Amis and Ron Rosenbaum agreed: Germany had been defeated by Dec. 1941 http://www.c-span.org/video/?322861-1/book-discussion-explaining-hitler-zone-interest

    If that is the case, then the campaign to firebomb Germany, with the stated intent of terrorizing civilians and even of killing “infants in their cribs,” was a wanton and deliberate act of genocide. It did not serve a military purpose — the enemy was already defeated.

    As I am typing this comment I am listening to John Kasich and Ted Cruz demand that the US military be unleashed and that they “carpet bomb the s%#t out of ISIS.” Sean Hannity discussed this with both Kasich and Cruz; Hannity intoned, with hand to heart, “we are a compassionate nation, we are pro-life”, but “collateral damage is inevitable; we have to defeat the enemy.” Perhaps what was most amusing in a sick sort of way is that Hannity, Kasich, and Cruz were skittish about saying “shit,” substituting a rhetorical blank space, but they had no qualms about demanding that an unknown number of other people’s children be incinerated. The audience at the Convention Center in Oxen Hill, MD cheered wildly.

    I argue that this bloodlust is epigenetically twined in American DNA, having been expressed in the US Civil war, as guestt noted at #7; was wildly expressed, encouraged, applauded and unpunished in the firebombing campaigns of WWII; was even more egregiously expressed in Viet Nam, where USA dropped even more tonnage of bombs than were dropped on Japan.

    There is something sick in USA DNA; all of the major candidates for POTUS express more-or-less virulent strains of this sickness.

    Working Class’s comment at #11. is worth emphasizing: If you participate in these crimes or applaud them or are indifferent to them you are in the service of evil.


    If I remain silent I have sinned. -Mohammad Mosaddegh, Prime Minister of Iran 1951-53,

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    "I argue that this bloodlust is epigenetically twined in American DNA" - More I learn of American history and more I hear or read past and present utterances by common and not common (politicians) Americans I begin to believe that you are right. City on the Hill, New Jerusalem, Manifest Destiny are memes through which this bloodlust was epigenetically spread. I think it all goes to the Old Testament, the oldest manual for genocide, that American Protestants adopted as their own book seeing themselves as being the new Jews.
    , @guest
    Death From Above is magical to imperialists. They can't get enough of it. Solves all life's problems. There is literally no foreign policy problem that can't be solved by bombing the hell out of them, whoever they may be.
    , @Unapologetic White Man
    You're ascribing things that are common to humans in general and pretending that they are unique to Americans. This anti-American crap is such a silly cliche at this point. To hear some people tell it, nothing bad ever happened until America came along. Meanwhile, we never get thanked for all the great we've done. Go to hell, and your country with you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Fred Z
    My German family and their friends had personal experience of this in April 1945 when the allies "terror bombed" Paderborn.

    They were unanimous in their comments to me that this bombing, even very late in the war, was not an evil and was necessary. They felt no ill will, no rancor, just regret at their own stupidity in having supported Hitler.

    Were their children too stupid to avoid possible incineration, too?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Epaminondas
    I love the way "patriots" explain away the terror bombing of civilians in WW2. "It was an existential struggle." Bullshit. It was terror bombing, period. Non-military targets like Dresden were destroyed to satisfy the blood lust of Allied leadership.

    My German family and their friends had personal experience of this in April 1945 when the allies “terror bombed” Paderborn.

    They were unanimous in their comments to me that this bombing, even very late in the war, was not an evil and was necessary. They felt no ill will, no rancor, just regret at their own stupidity in having supported Hitler.

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    Were their children too stupid to avoid possible incineration, too?
    , @Reg Cæsar
    Did they feel any guilt for bombing Coventry?
    , @anonymous

    The nations with the technological capacity to conquer nature are also best equipped to conquer other peoples who exist at the mercy of nature. And once the primitive enemy was defeated, the British carried out their moral obligation to instruct him in the ways of modern civilization, especially the acquisition of technological benefits. Churchill was hugely proud of the civilizing mission essential to British empire-building.
     
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

    I keep reading about ‘civilization’, especially ‘western civilization’ here and in the comments.
    Is there any evidence whatever that evolution gives a flying fuck about ‘civilization’? I rather think the evidence is to the contrary. Civilization protects evolutionary losers. That can only go on so long.
    http://www.unz.com/isteve/sweden-the-fix-is-in/#comment-814896
     
    , @SolontoCroesus
    Excellent!!

    They were unanimous in their comments to me that this bombing, even very late in the war, was not an evil and was necessary. They felt no ill will, no rancor, just regret at their own stupidity in having supported Hitler.
     
    All those years of brainwashing worked.

    Now, you Germans have your job cut out for you:

    You can form Manchurian Candidate brigades to convince the people of Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Gaza that


    this bombing, even very late in the war, was not an evil and was necessary. They felt no ill will, no rancor, just regret at their own stupidity in having supported Hitler Saddam, and Assad, and Qaddafi. and Nasrallah
     
    Excellent timing too; the hydrangeas will soon be in bloom

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBDhoUZgsDo

    , @RadicalCenter
    Then your german friends are brainwashed, self-hating pussies. I speak some German and our children attend German class on the weekend where we meet many German parents, and we encounter this sickening attitude among them too -- though not uniformly, if one can speak with them privately.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Sadly, it’s not Donald Trump who believes in the mass killing of innocent people as “collateral damage” while hunting down people waging military campaign against occupiers of their lands – demonized as “terrorists” by the western imperialists.

    Take for example, the United states and Israel, whom Noam Chomsky has labeled as “world’s top terrorist states”. For these two “terrorist states”, Hamas and Hizbullah are “terrorist organizations” because they’re fight the US-Israel terrorism on daily basis.

    After John Kerry’s visit to Israel (Ha’aretz, November 27, 2015) senior officials from Israel Occupation Force (IOF) and internal security Shin Bet warned the Zionist regime’s national security team that their Palestinian Gandhi, Mahmoud Abbas, ruled Palestinian Authority (PA) is about to collapse soon.

    In the wake of the above mentioned warning, Congressman, Jim McGovern, a long-time and steadfast supporter of ‘Israel has the right to exist myth’, called on Netanyahu to start talking to Gaza ruling Islamic resistance Hamas in order to revive the so-called two-state solution.

    Jim McGovern, a Democrat who co-chairs the influential ‘Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission’ – named after Jewish Rep. Tom Lantos (d. 2008). He was in London to receive an accolade at the ‘Sergei Magnitsky Human Rights Awards’ – said he is a staunch supporter of Israel and supports the US-Iran nuclear agreement because it would be good for Israel in long-term…..

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/11/28/rep-mcgovern-only-hamas-can-guarantee-israels-security/

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    This Tom Lantos? Of Iraq fame? So human rights!
    http://www.counterpunch.org/2003/02/15/the-lies-of-tom-lantos/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Jan 31, 2012 The girl killed by Barack Obama – she never saw it coming

    July 23, 2012 Children of the Drone

    We’re told that predator drones armed to the teeth are keeping us safe by killing dangerous terroristson the other side of the globe, but is that really the case? Let me introduce you to….’The Children of the Drone’s’

    http://www.hangthebankers.com/children-of-the-drone/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • November 13th, 2015 NY Times Rally—Friday the 13th; Drone Papers Coverup

    In June of 1971, the New York Times had the courage to initiate the publishing of Daniel Ellsburg’s “Pentagon Papers.” This brave action against the will of a criminal executive branch, combined with the principled decision by then-Senator Mike Gravel (AK) to release 4,100 pages of the Pentagon Papers into the Senate Record, helped spark a fight that led to the end of the criminal presidency of Richard NIxon and was instrumental in bringing the Indochina War to an end. The Papers documented that the war was being lost, not won, and that McNamara’s “body count” metric was fraudulent and criminal.

    http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2015/11/13/title-290#more40743

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Washington’s “allies” Israel, Saudi and Turkey want to divide up Syria. Washington wants to rule the world by force of arms. War profiteers (may they rot in hell) are raking in the money. These are the immediate causes of mass murder in Syria. The root cause is human nature. If you participate in these crimes or applaud them or are indifferent to them you are in the service of evil.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I love the way “patriots” explain away the terror bombing of civilians in WW2. “It was an existential struggle.” Bullshit. It was terror bombing, period. Non-military targets like Dresden were destroyed to satisfy the blood lust of Allied leadership.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Fred Z
    My German family and their friends had personal experience of this in April 1945 when the allies "terror bombed" Paderborn.

    They were unanimous in their comments to me that this bombing, even very late in the war, was not an evil and was necessary. They felt no ill will, no rancor, just regret at their own stupidity in having supported Hitler.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • biz says:

    People in Yemen and Afghanistan don’t care about their own women and children, so these are crocodile tears on their part. They cover their women in trash bags and marry off their children to cousins before puberty. If they don’t care about their own women and children, why is it our job to prioritize their women and children over ours?

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    "...why is it our job to prioritize their women and children over ours?"
    You mean, why the US State Dept. has been so eager to do "humanitarian" missions in the faraway lands?
    People in the US do not care about their children by allowing the silver-spooners (like Bush the lesser) and war profiteering psychopaths (see Cheney and his State dept., the weaponry producers, and the PNAC geniuses and such) to send our boys and girls to fight the wars of choice. During these wars, the locals have been killed in hundreds of thousands, whereas the survivors became inflamed with anti-US sentiments. - An understandable reaction from those whose parents and children were reduced to shredded meat. As for Yemen, it is the US' bosom ally, the Saudis that have been bombing there. "Human Rights Watch released a report Sunday providing new indications that Saudi Arabia has fired American-made cluster munitions, banned by international treaty, in civilian areas of Yemen..." http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/15/world/middleeast/new-report-of-us-made-cluster-bomb-use-by-saudis-in-yemen.html?_r=0
    , @guest
    What do our women and children have to do with it?
    , @Anonymous
    I've met Afghani and Yemeni families. They do indeed care about their loved ones, whether man, woman, or child. Basically what you are saying is that because you disapprove of their sartorial choices and whom they chose to marry and how they choose, that murdering them is a-ok. You clearly possess the sociopathic lack of empathy of which you accuse others. People are people, regardless of their ethnicity or culture.
    , @Rufus
    Strange that you think people in Afghanistan or Pakistan don't care about their own children. I have known numerous people from Pakistan and other places. They are not unlike most Americans. Except, that they do not have a sociopathic justification to murder innocents. Your argument is akin to the position of Hitler and the superiority of their master race.

    Perhaps there are people somewhere who feel the same way about Americans as you do about Yemenis. The difference is that they never wanted to attack America until we started poking our noses into their business. To be sure, we are the aggressors.
    , @Bizarro World Observer
    What a bizarre thing to say. Because their cultural customs offend your delicate sense of propriety, they're incapable of love. That's your first non-sequitur.

    But the second really takes the cake. Those people don't love each other, therefore we can kill as many as we want. That's just morally grotesque.

    The third is almost as bad. How does killing innocents halfway around the world make us any safer? Part of the author's point is that it just encourages those who loved them to take revenge.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @utu
    I looked at the link you gave about the German-Japanese village they built in Utah. Who wrote this document and when? For what purpose? Where in the document it is stated that the village was built before Nov. 7 1941?

    I think you mean Dec.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous

    a program that originated under President George W. Bush as a crucial part of his “global war on terror,” and that was further institutionalized and ramped up under President Obama, will soon be bequeathed to a new president-elect.
     
    No, the program of killing civilians from the air did not originate with George W. Bush.

    It originated with Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

    Planning for the deliberate incineration of German civilians began in October 1938 (see Peter Moreira, Henry Morgenthau: The Jew who Defeated Hitler) when FDR and his Secretary of Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., made plans to acquire factories to build bombers.

    In 1939 Roosevelt issued an executive order authorizing the acquisition of property in the Utah desert where US Air Force, Standard Oil, Harvard architects including Erich Mendelsohn, "the Jewish architect," and Hollywood set designers later built German Village and Japanese village.

    They practiced bombing these exact replica buildings with the goal of producing a firestorm that would multiply itself and destroy the greatest expanse of urban infrastructure and destroy the maximum number of human lives.

    The furnishings specified by the Hollywood set designers included cribs, with the expectation that a young, working class German family with an infant would inhabit the residence the US Air Force intended to obliterate through its bombing campaign.

    The United States Department of the Interior has documented the purpose and design of German Village; it's here: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/master/pnp/habshaer/ut/ut0500/ut0568/data/ut0568data.pdf

    Furniture included an upholstered sofa (7); an upholstered easy chair (14); a settee
    (14); a kitchen buffet (7); . . . (28) ; a crib, with mattress and springs (14); a wicker chair (7) ;. . .Quantities reflected an understanding that some furnishings would be lost in the fires set by the incendiary tests, and would then be replaced in kind.

    In the bedroom, the single beds were placed together in pairs, with a crib adjacent, reflective of a young family with an infant.
    During preliminary penetration tests with dummy bombs all furnishings except the rugs were removed, with windows and doors closed (Standard Oil Development Company Specifications for Special Teat Furnishings April 1943; Standard Oil Development Company Inspection Report on Furnishings April 1943; T.D.M.R. No. 713 July 1943)
     
    In The Fog of War, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KSqnK_9WRA Robert McNamara repeats a conversation he had with Curtiss LeMay regarding US participation in the carpet bombing of Germany and Japan:

    LeMay said, "If we'd lost the war, we'd all have been prosecuted as war criminals." And I think he's right. He, and I'd say I, were behaving as war criminals. LeMay recognized that what he was doing would be thought immoral if his side had lost. But what makes it immoral if you lose and not immoral if you win? http://www.errolmorris.com/film/fow_transcript.html
     
    Consequent to US "winning" the war against Germany, it participated with other Allies, the USSR and Britain, in conducting the Nuremberg Trials, under which German, and only German, war fighters, leaders and even writers were tried, convicted and hanged or imprisoned.

    Shortly before his death, Harry Reicher explained to an audience at the Eisenhower Library

    an episode which occurred in the immediate aftermath of the Holocaust. While liberating concentration camps and witnessing sights that “beggar description,” General Eisenhower ensured the horrific scenes were captured for posterity in graphic photographs and film. Professor Reicher asserted that he grasped the impact which visual evidence was to have in the Nuremberg Trials, and foresaw the era of Holocaust denial. Video clips of concentration camps were shown.
    http://www.c-span.org/video/?297082-1/general-eisenhower-documentation-holocaust
     
    Reicher noted that Eisenhower employed Hollywood film crews to enter Ohrdruf camp, before even the Red Cross, and film the dead and dying there. Reicher emphasizes that the deeply "disturbing" content of that film and the emotional reaction it aroused throughout the world formed the major and most damning evidence against the German defendants and was also responsible for the harsh treatment meted out to the German people, under the Morgenthau plan, for over two years after Germany's surrender, until George Marshall said Enough.

    In other words, the Jewish film studio set designers who created German Village where methods were perfected to kill German infants were the same Jewish film makers who produced the graphic images used to condemn Germans at Nuremberg and beyond. Several of those Jewish film makers who took those images appear in in a docu-video Imaginary Witness: Hollywood and the Holocaust,

    I am not aware if those same Jewish film makers recorded the results of the US and British firebombing of the 131 German cities and the (estimated) 600,000 German people who were incinerated, or of the 60 Japanese cities and the more than 250,000 Japanese civilians who were wiped out by acts that McNamara and LeMay concede were "war crimes" but for which the United States has never been called to account.

    Because the American people and their leaders have never come to grips with the war crimes committed in their name in World War II, those criminal acts have been repeated. Indeed, they have become a celebrated frame of reference.

    Jeffrey Engel has examined the process by which George H. W. Bush made the decision to invade Iraq in 1990 - 1991. Engel sets the context for that decision: the Berlin wall had just toppled; Gorbachev and Bush were on close speaking terms; the United States was the sole superpower, and George H W Bush was president in a unipolar moment.

    Engel reported that Gorbachev "pestered" Bush with phone calls urging him not to intervene militarily in the conflict, and also acknowledged that Arab leaders pleaded with Bush to restrain himself, that the Arabs understood Saddam and were capable of resolving the conflict on their own terms in their own way. Although Engel does not explore this scenario, it is a fact that the late Jack O'Connell, who had been CIA station chief in Jordan and then became friends with and counselor to Jordan's King Hussein. In that role, O'Connell and the Jordanian monarch negotiated an arrangement to which Saddam agreed, that would have resolved the Iraq-Kuwait conflict nonviolently.

    George H. W. Bush rejected all of those overtures.

    To explain why Bush was insistent upon invading Iraq, Engel said:

    "I argue Bush took the dramatic step into the Gulf Crisis because he saw it as a bridge to a better world. His New World Order, a phrase unveiled in response to Hussein’s invasion, was not just a catchy phrase; ; it was rather the culmination of a long and difficult journey of intellectual discovery. . . .
    Bush recognized that the end of the Cold War eliminated the most stable aspects of the international system since 1945 . . . During the Spring and Summer of 1990 Bush told Global leaders that their alliances required an enemy to survive. In his words the new enemy was instability itself. . . .
    Bush saw in the Gulf War an opportunity as well as an invasion, a point that I will make by way of conclusion. .. He saw within it a chance to demonstrate that Washington would continue to lead, leading it in particular towards the kind of world promised to His generation as their reward for service in World War II. . . .He said, . . . quote “The prospect of a global peace continues to depend on an American forward presence. End quote.
     
    The supposed triumph of the United States in World War II is the inflection point and the reference point for all subsequent U S foreign policy decisions. As Engel's argument, above, states, Bush's beliefs about US vis a vis World War II were the critical factor in the Persian Gulf war.

    Bombing weddings is not new to the American people. They have been taught to celebrate killing other people's children over the course of the last 70 years and more -- for most of us, our entire lives.

    We did it to the German and Japanese people and called ourselves righteous.

    Jews, who were at the forefront of the destruction of Germany, have claimed for themselves the exclusive mantle of victimhood, thereby simultaneously erecting a barrier against any genuine American soul-searching, and sucking all of the oxygen out of air.

    It is a moral imperative that the people of the United States deny the holocaust; that is, confront the truth of who-did-what-to-whom and why, in the World Wars, that event that was the inflection point for American history. If you feel compelled to bomb something, target holocaust museums/liar's factories, or turn them into something useful like skating rinks or shooting galleries.

    Tell the truth.
    Beg forgiveness.
    Make reparations.
    Mend your ways.

    Stop killing people and calling it virtue.





    PS Reg Caesar summed up this lengthy cri de cœur in about 30 words here: http://www.unz.com/imercer/making-america-great-means-exposing-w/#comment-1343943

    I don’t see deliberately killing civilians from the air as fundamentally different than killing them on the ground, so we should trace it back to William Tecumseh Sherman. For armies had ignored other armies and fought unarmed people instead (which is easier, don’t ya know) before, despite rules against it. But I don’t think that before in U.S. history did the highest level of power respond to lawlessness with, “Ah, who cares?”

    Except with the Injuns, obviously, but did the rules apply to red men? Those wars were Total Wars from the get-go, whereas the war against the states (i.e. not red people) had to build up a head of steam first.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    we should trace it back to William Tecumseh Sherman
     
    ...whose men cried, "Remember Chambersburg!" Sherman was not an innovator.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    so we should trace it back to William Tecumseh Sherman
     
    ...whose men would cry, "Remember Chambersburg!" Sherman was not an innovator.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Who will get your support as the best candidate to continue killing the loved ones of others?

    Well the main candidates are all pretty reliable mass murderers and torturers, from Clinton’s “humanitarian interventionism” to Rubio’s neocon warmongering, and Kasich’s and Cruz’s “let’s provoke Russia as much as we can” stupidity.

    Ironically the only candidate who might actually reduce the number of wars the US is involved in is the one making the loudest bluster and noise, Donald Trump.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Go to the polls, America.”

    That will change nothing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous

    a program that originated under President George W. Bush as a crucial part of his “global war on terror,” and that was further institutionalized and ramped up under President Obama, will soon be bequeathed to a new president-elect.
     
    No, the program of killing civilians from the air did not originate with George W. Bush.

    It originated with Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

    Planning for the deliberate incineration of German civilians began in October 1938 (see Peter Moreira, Henry Morgenthau: The Jew who Defeated Hitler) when FDR and his Secretary of Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., made plans to acquire factories to build bombers.

    In 1939 Roosevelt issued an executive order authorizing the acquisition of property in the Utah desert where US Air Force, Standard Oil, Harvard architects including Erich Mendelsohn, "the Jewish architect," and Hollywood set designers later built German Village and Japanese village.

    They practiced bombing these exact replica buildings with the goal of producing a firestorm that would multiply itself and destroy the greatest expanse of urban infrastructure and destroy the maximum number of human lives.

    The furnishings specified by the Hollywood set designers included cribs, with the expectation that a young, working class German family with an infant would inhabit the residence the US Air Force intended to obliterate through its bombing campaign.

    The United States Department of the Interior has documented the purpose and design of German Village; it's here: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/master/pnp/habshaer/ut/ut0500/ut0568/data/ut0568data.pdf

    Furniture included an upholstered sofa (7); an upholstered easy chair (14); a settee
    (14); a kitchen buffet (7); . . . (28) ; a crib, with mattress and springs (14); a wicker chair (7) ;. . .Quantities reflected an understanding that some furnishings would be lost in the fires set by the incendiary tests, and would then be replaced in kind.

    In the bedroom, the single beds were placed together in pairs, with a crib adjacent, reflective of a young family with an infant.
    During preliminary penetration tests with dummy bombs all furnishings except the rugs were removed, with windows and doors closed (Standard Oil Development Company Specifications for Special Teat Furnishings April 1943; Standard Oil Development Company Inspection Report on Furnishings April 1943; T.D.M.R. No. 713 July 1943)
     
    In The Fog of War, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KSqnK_9WRA Robert McNamara repeats a conversation he had with Curtiss LeMay regarding US participation in the carpet bombing of Germany and Japan:

    LeMay said, "If we'd lost the war, we'd all have been prosecuted as war criminals." And I think he's right. He, and I'd say I, were behaving as war criminals. LeMay recognized that what he was doing would be thought immoral if his side had lost. But what makes it immoral if you lose and not immoral if you win? http://www.errolmorris.com/film/fow_transcript.html
     
    Consequent to US "winning" the war against Germany, it participated with other Allies, the USSR and Britain, in conducting the Nuremberg Trials, under which German, and only German, war fighters, leaders and even writers were tried, convicted and hanged or imprisoned.

    Shortly before his death, Harry Reicher explained to an audience at the Eisenhower Library

    an episode which occurred in the immediate aftermath of the Holocaust. While liberating concentration camps and witnessing sights that “beggar description,” General Eisenhower ensured the horrific scenes were captured for posterity in graphic photographs and film. Professor Reicher asserted that he grasped the impact which visual evidence was to have in the Nuremberg Trials, and foresaw the era of Holocaust denial. Video clips of concentration camps were shown.
    http://www.c-span.org/video/?297082-1/general-eisenhower-documentation-holocaust
     
    Reicher noted that Eisenhower employed Hollywood film crews to enter Ohrdruf camp, before even the Red Cross, and film the dead and dying there. Reicher emphasizes that the deeply "disturbing" content of that film and the emotional reaction it aroused throughout the world formed the major and most damning evidence against the German defendants and was also responsible for the harsh treatment meted out to the German people, under the Morgenthau plan, for over two years after Germany's surrender, until George Marshall said Enough.

    In other words, the Jewish film studio set designers who created German Village where methods were perfected to kill German infants were the same Jewish film makers who produced the graphic images used to condemn Germans at Nuremberg and beyond. Several of those Jewish film makers who took those images appear in in a docu-video Imaginary Witness: Hollywood and the Holocaust,

    I am not aware if those same Jewish film makers recorded the results of the US and British firebombing of the 131 German cities and the (estimated) 600,000 German people who were incinerated, or of the 60 Japanese cities and the more than 250,000 Japanese civilians who were wiped out by acts that McNamara and LeMay concede were "war crimes" but for which the United States has never been called to account.

    Because the American people and their leaders have never come to grips with the war crimes committed in their name in World War II, those criminal acts have been repeated. Indeed, they have become a celebrated frame of reference.

    Jeffrey Engel has examined the process by which George H. W. Bush made the decision to invade Iraq in 1990 - 1991. Engel sets the context for that decision: the Berlin wall had just toppled; Gorbachev and Bush were on close speaking terms; the United States was the sole superpower, and George H W Bush was president in a unipolar moment.

    Engel reported that Gorbachev "pestered" Bush with phone calls urging him not to intervene militarily in the conflict, and also acknowledged that Arab leaders pleaded with Bush to restrain himself, that the Arabs understood Saddam and were capable of resolving the conflict on their own terms in their own way. Although Engel does not explore this scenario, it is a fact that the late Jack O'Connell, who had been CIA station chief in Jordan and then became friends with and counselor to Jordan's King Hussein. In that role, O'Connell and the Jordanian monarch negotiated an arrangement to which Saddam agreed, that would have resolved the Iraq-Kuwait conflict nonviolently.

    George H. W. Bush rejected all of those overtures.

    To explain why Bush was insistent upon invading Iraq, Engel said:

    "I argue Bush took the dramatic step into the Gulf Crisis because he saw it as a bridge to a better world. His New World Order, a phrase unveiled in response to Hussein’s invasion, was not just a catchy phrase; ; it was rather the culmination of a long and difficult journey of intellectual discovery. . . .
    Bush recognized that the end of the Cold War eliminated the most stable aspects of the international system since 1945 . . . During the Spring and Summer of 1990 Bush told Global leaders that their alliances required an enemy to survive. In his words the new enemy was instability itself. . . .
    Bush saw in the Gulf War an opportunity as well as an invasion, a point that I will make by way of conclusion. .. He saw within it a chance to demonstrate that Washington would continue to lead, leading it in particular towards the kind of world promised to His generation as their reward for service in World War II. . . .He said, . . . quote “The prospect of a global peace continues to depend on an American forward presence. End quote.
     
    The supposed triumph of the United States in World War II is the inflection point and the reference point for all subsequent U S foreign policy decisions. As Engel's argument, above, states, Bush's beliefs about US vis a vis World War II were the critical factor in the Persian Gulf war.

    Bombing weddings is not new to the American people. They have been taught to celebrate killing other people's children over the course of the last 70 years and more -- for most of us, our entire lives.

    We did it to the German and Japanese people and called ourselves righteous.

    Jews, who were at the forefront of the destruction of Germany, have claimed for themselves the exclusive mantle of victimhood, thereby simultaneously erecting a barrier against any genuine American soul-searching, and sucking all of the oxygen out of air.

    It is a moral imperative that the people of the United States deny the holocaust; that is, confront the truth of who-did-what-to-whom and why, in the World Wars, that event that was the inflection point for American history. If you feel compelled to bomb something, target holocaust museums/liar's factories, or turn them into something useful like skating rinks or shooting galleries.

    Tell the truth.
    Beg forgiveness.
    Make reparations.
    Mend your ways.

    Stop killing people and calling it virtue.





    PS Reg Caesar summed up this lengthy cri de cœur in about 30 words here: http://www.unz.com/imercer/making-america-great-means-exposing-w/#comment-1343943

    I looked at the link you gave about the German-Japanese village they built in Utah. Who wrote this document and when? For what purpose? Where in the document it is stated that the village was built before Nov. 7 1941?

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    I think you mean Dec.
    , @anonymous
    utu --

    the link opens on the cover page which states that the doc was prepared by U S Department of the Interior as part of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) project -- the title suggests the purpose of the doc.

    don't know when it was written -- last 20 years is my guess.

    I assume that your question about the date, which guest corrected, was trying to get at whether the German - Japanese village project was undertaken before or after USA had been attacked and declared war/declared war upon, and that's an interesting question with a multi-part answer (devils & details being what they are).

    a. I didn't find a date in 1941 in the HAER doc.

    b. As noted in my comment, Roosevelt and Henry Morgenthau, Jr. met in Oct 1938 -- after Hitler and Chamberlain had negotiated the Munich agreement but before it was ratified, and before Herschel Grynszpan assassinated Ernst vom Rath which set off the night of broken glass -- they laid plans to acquire plants to manufacture bombers. Before 1941 USA was producing 15 000 bombers annually. That information is from Peter Moreira's "The Jew who Defeated Hitler: Henry Morgenthau, Jr. ..."

    c. Roosevelt signed an executive order in Jan. 1939 instructing the Army to acquire land and create a facility at Dugway to research and develop chemical and biological weapons against the possibility that Germany would use chemical weapons in a future war.

    d. from other study, I have learned that Erich Mendelsohn began work on German Village in mid-to- late 1942.

    So it appears that German and Japanese Villages were not built until after USA was involved in war with Germany and Japan.

    It is also true that military and political opinion among the Allies was clear: By Dec. 1941 Germany was a spent force; the Wehrmacht had been exhausted. Persons who participate in Pat Lang's blog http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2015/11/warlords.html#tpe-action-resize-367 -- many of them former national security, or CIA, or US military members, have stated that their fathers/uncles etc. who were in the military in WWII had been sent to deep immersion German language and culture courses in mid-1941 in preparation for US occupation of Germany when the Allies won the war, which was deemed inevitable. In a conversation at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in NYC in 2014, Martin Amis and Ron Rosenbaum agreed: Germany had been defeated by Dec. 1941 http://www.c-span.org/video/?322861-1/book-discussion-explaining-hitler-zone-interest

    If that is the case, then the campaign to firebomb Germany, with the stated intent of terrorizing civilians and even of killing "infants in their cribs," was a wanton and deliberate act of genocide. It did not serve a military purpose -- the enemy was already defeated.

    As I am typing this comment I am listening to John Kasich and Ted Cruz demand that the US military be unleashed and that they "carpet bomb the s%#t out of ISIS." Sean Hannity discussed this with both Kasich and Cruz; Hannity intoned, with hand to heart, "we are a compassionate nation, we are pro-life", but "collateral damage is inevitable; we have to defeat the enemy." Perhaps what was most amusing in a sick sort of way is that Hannity, Kasich, and Cruz were skittish about saying "shit," substituting a rhetorical blank space, but they had no qualms about demanding that an unknown number of other people's children be incinerated. The audience at the Convention Center in Oxen Hill, MD cheered wildly.

    I argue that this bloodlust is epigenetically twined in American DNA, having been expressed in the US Civil war, as guestt noted at #7; was wildly expressed, encouraged, applauded and unpunished in the firebombing campaigns of WWII; was even more egregiously expressed in Viet Nam, where USA dropped even more tonnage of bombs than were dropped on Japan.

    There is something sick in USA DNA; all of the major candidates for POTUS express more-or-less virulent strains of this sickness.

    Working Class's comment at #11. is worth emphasizing: If you participate in these crimes or applaud them or are indifferent to them you are in the service of evil.

    --
    If I remain silent I have sinned. -Mohammad Mosaddegh, Prime Minister of Iran 1951-53,

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • You can’t fight wars without killing civilians. Fact.

    But there is no point in fighting unwinnable wars caused in many cases by your imperialistic involvement in foreign lands. You cannot bomb out of existence ideas, especially when you contribute to an environment that nurtures their growth.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    a program that originated under President George W. Bush as a crucial part of his “global war on terror,” and that was further institutionalized and ramped up under President Obama, will soon be bequeathed to a new president-elect.

    No, the program of killing civilians from the air did not originate with George W. Bush.

    It originated with Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

    Planning for the deliberate incineration of German civilians began in October 1938 (see Peter Moreira, Henry Morgenthau: The Jew who Defeated Hitler) when FDR and his Secretary of Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., made plans to acquire factories to build bombers.

    In 1939 Roosevelt issued an executive order authorizing the acquisition of property in the Utah desert where US Air Force, Standard Oil, Harvard architects including Erich Mendelsohn, “the Jewish architect,” and Hollywood set designers later built German Village and Japanese village.

    [MORE]

    They practiced bombing these exact replica buildings with the goal of producing a firestorm that would multiply itself and destroy the greatest expanse of urban infrastructure and destroy the maximum number of human lives.

    The furnishings specified by the Hollywood set designers included cribs, with the expectation that a young, working class German family with an infant would inhabit the residence the US Air Force intended to obliterate through its bombing campaign.

    The United States Department of the Interior has documented the purpose and design of German Village; it’s here: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/master/pnp/habshaer/ut/ut0500/ut0568/data/ut0568data.pdf

    Furniture included an upholstered sofa (7); an upholstered easy chair (14); a settee
    (14); a kitchen buffet (7); . . . (28) ; a crib, with mattress and springs (14); a wicker chair (7) ;. . .Quantities reflected an understanding that some furnishings would be lost in the fires set by the incendiary tests, and would then be replaced in kind.

    In the bedroom, the single beds were placed together in pairs, with a crib adjacent, reflective of a young family with an infant.
    During preliminary penetration tests with dummy bombs all furnishings except the rugs were removed, with windows and doors closed (Standard Oil Development Company Specifications for Special Teat Furnishings April 1943; Standard Oil Development Company Inspection Report on Furnishings April 1943; T.D.M.R. No. 713 July 1943)

    In The Fog of War,

    Robert McNamara repeats a conversation he had with Curtiss LeMay regarding US participation in the carpet bombing of Germany and Japan:

    LeMay said, “If we’d lost the war, we’d all have been prosecuted as war criminals.” And I think he’s right. He, and I’d say I, were behaving as war criminals. LeMay recognized that what he was doing would be thought immoral if his side had lost. But what makes it immoral if you lose and not immoral if you win? http://www.errolmorris.com/film/fow_transcript.html

    Consequent to US “winning” the war against Germany, it participated with other Allies, the USSR and Britain, in conducting the Nuremberg Trials, under which German, and only German, war fighters, leaders and even writers were tried, convicted and hanged or imprisoned.

    Shortly before his death, Harry Reicher explained to an audience at the Eisenhower Library

    an episode which occurred in the immediate aftermath of the Holocaust. While liberating concentration camps and witnessing sights that “beggar description,” General Eisenhower ensured the horrific scenes were captured for posterity in graphic photographs and film. Professor Reicher asserted that he grasped the impact which visual evidence was to have in the Nuremberg Trials, and foresaw the era of Holocaust denial. Video clips of concentration camps were shown.

    http://www.c-span.org/video/?297082-1/general-eisenhower-documentation-holocaust

    Reicher noted that Eisenhower employed Hollywood film crews to enter Ohrdruf camp, before even the Red Cross, and film the dead and dying there. Reicher emphasizes that the deeply “disturbing” content of that film and the emotional reaction it aroused throughout the world formed the major and most damning evidence against the German defendants and was also responsible for the harsh treatment meted out to the German people, under the Morgenthau plan, for over two years after Germany’s surrender, until George Marshall said Enough.

    In other words, the Jewish film studio set designers who created German Village where methods were perfected to kill German infants were the same Jewish film makers who produced the graphic images used to condemn Germans at Nuremberg and beyond. Several of those Jewish film makers who took those images appear in in a docu-video Imaginary Witness: Hollywood and the Holocaust,

    I am not aware if those same Jewish film makers recorded the results of the US and British firebombing of the 131 German cities and the (estimated) 600,000 German people who were incinerated, or of the 60 Japanese cities and the more than 250,000 Japanese civilians who were wiped out by acts that McNamara and LeMay concede were “war crimes” but for which the United States has never been called to account.

    Because the American people and their leaders have never come to grips with the war crimes committed in their name in World War II, those criminal acts have been repeated. Indeed, they have become a celebrated frame of reference.

    Jeffrey Engel has examined the process by which George H. W. Bush made the decision to invade Iraq in 1990 – 1991. Engel sets the context for that decision: the Berlin wall had just toppled; Gorbachev and Bush were on close speaking terms; the United States was the sole superpower, and George H W Bush was president in a unipolar moment.

    Engel reported that Gorbachev “pestered” Bush with phone calls urging him not to intervene militarily in the conflict, and also acknowledged that Arab leaders pleaded with Bush to restrain himself, that the Arabs understood Saddam and were capable of resolving the conflict on their own terms in their own way. Although Engel does not explore this scenario, it is a fact that the late Jack O’Connell, who had been CIA station chief in Jordan and then became friends with and counselor to Jordan’s King Hussein. In that role, O’Connell and the Jordanian monarch negotiated an arrangement to which Saddam agreed, that would have resolved the Iraq-Kuwait conflict nonviolently.

    George H. W. Bush rejected all of those overtures.

    To explain why Bush was insistent upon invading Iraq, Engel said:

    “I argue Bush took the dramatic step into the Gulf Crisis because he saw it as a bridge to a better world. His New World Order, a phrase unveiled in response to Hussein’s invasion, was not just a catchy phrase; ; it was rather the culmination of a long and difficult journey of intellectual discovery. . . .
    Bush recognized that the end of the Cold War eliminated the most stable aspects of the international system since 1945 . . . During the Spring and Summer of 1990 Bush told Global leaders that their alliances required an enemy to survive. In his words the new enemy was instability itself. . . .
    Bush saw in the Gulf War an opportunity as well as an invasion, a point that I will make by way of conclusion. .. He saw within it a chance to demonstrate that Washington would continue to lead, leading it in particular towards the kind of world promised to His generation as their reward for service in World War II. . . .He said, . . . quote “The prospect of a global peace continues to depend on an American forward presence. End quote.

    The supposed triumph of the United States in World War II is the inflection point and the reference point for all subsequent U S foreign policy decisions. As Engel’s argument, above, states, Bush’s beliefs about US vis a vis World War II were the critical factor in the Persian Gulf war.

    Bombing weddings is not new to the American people. They have been taught to celebrate killing other people’s children over the course of the last 70 years and more — for most of us, our entire lives.

    We did it to the German and Japanese people and called ourselves righteous.

    Jews, who were at the forefront of the destruction of Germany, have claimed for themselves the exclusive mantle of victimhood, thereby simultaneously erecting a barrier against any genuine American soul-searching, and sucking all of the oxygen out of air.

    It is a moral imperative that the people of the United States deny the holocaust; that is, confront the truth of who-did-what-to-whom and why, in the World Wars, that event that was the inflection point for American history. If you feel compelled to bomb something, target holocaust museums/liar’s factories, or turn them into something useful like skating rinks or shooting galleries.

    Tell the truth.
    Beg forgiveness.
    Make reparations.
    Mend your ways.

    Stop killing people and calling it virtue.

    PS Reg Caesar summed up this lengthy cri de cœur in about 30 words here: http://www.unz.com/imercer/making-america-great-means-exposing-w/#comment-1343943

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    I looked at the link you gave about the German-Japanese village they built in Utah. Who wrote this document and when? For what purpose? Where in the document it is stated that the village was built before Nov. 7 1941?
    , @guest
    I don't see deliberately killing civilians from the air as fundamentally different than killing them on the ground, so we should trace it back to William Tecumseh Sherman. For armies had ignored other armies and fought unarmed people instead (which is easier, don't ya know) before, despite rules against it. But I don't think that before in U.S. history did the highest level of power respond to lawlessness with, "Ah, who cares?"

    Except with the Injuns, obviously, but did the rules apply to red men? Those wars were Total Wars from the get-go, whereas the war against the states (i.e. not red people) had to build up a head of steam first.

    , @random observer
    Most major countries who expected they might participate in the next war, or who anticipated their interests might draw them in, planned for many likely eventualities. That's how you plan. If you do it well enough in advance it might help you win. It's a lot smarter than just making it up as you go. The US also planned what armored warfare in Europe might be like, and what naval war in the Pacific might demand. Not doing these things before the war would have been stupid, even for countries that would have tried to stay out.

    Most of them expected to both bomb other countries and be bombed in turn. The US didn't have much to worry on that latter count. Japan did, but didn't plan well enough for it.

    Countries that planned to bomb [US, Japan], to be bombed [France, somewhat], or to both bomb and be bombed [Britain, Germany, Russia, Italy [though they didn't do too much on defense] ] saw their plans tested 1939-45.

    The Germans did medium well on offense- they had planned for strategic bombing but their force structure was more configured for tactical support and for terror bombing of defenceless cities only ahead of the advancing army. They weren't configured for offense on either a sustained basis or against really serious air defenses. The only really long-range bomber was not built for bomb load or self-defense. Their fighters were short range. But they most certainly had not only planned to bomb enemy cities, they had done it in Spain for Franco.

    The British and the US planned better and had better planes for it, at least by 1941-2.

    Considering that most of these countries openly discussed the idea of strategic bombing, with themselves as both offensive and defensive participants, in the 1930s, in both official and public contexts, and tried to prepare their people openly in many cases, it is not surprising that such planning was going on. Besides, all of those same countries pretty well took the view that nothing in international law forbade it. And nothing specific did. That's why it had to be outlawed after the war.

    Whatever else might be said of all that, there was certainly nothing underhanded, conspiratorial, or unlawful about any of these prewar preparations.

    Indeed, and contrary to the modern drone war, the powers of the 1930s at least aimed to wait until an actual war was declared. That's a high standard these days.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.