The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / By Lance Welton
 All Comments / By Lance Welton
    Unless it involves mocking President Trump’s supposedly “small hands,” there is nothing that horrifies our multiculturalist masters more than judging by appearances. It is impossible, they claim, to infer anything about how someone is likely to behave by their gender or because they are from a particular ethnic group. Everyone is unique (but also, somehow,...
  • top psychology journals

    That phrase is of a piece with ‘smartest mongoloid’ or ‘slimmest hippopotamus’.

    Psych research is some of the worst-executed, least-replicable, pulled-out-of-my-ass garbage in the academic literature. It is endogenously worse than highly-conflicted pharma research.

    Imagine that: being worse than a research field known to be corrupted by money… but not even being paid for it – pharma researchers are bad ‘on purpose’ in exchange for the shekels; psych researchers are worse, just because of the low quality of entrants into the field.

    People from disciplines with higher standards have known this since the mid-20h century, but we can finally start to put some hard borders around it – the Cochrane Collaboration and other replication efforts (e.g., the Open Science Collaboration) have shown that less than 40% of ‘landmark’ psych studies were able to be replicated (see “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science” Science Vol. 349, Issue 6251, aac4716 DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4716 (28 Aug 2015).

    I think the authors should have put “Science” in scare-quotes, because there’s about as much ‘science’ in psych as there is in Creation “Science”, “Scient”-ology, or the Church of Jesus Christ, “Scientist”.
    .
    .
    That said: I would say that, wouldn’t I… as a tall, hairy, part-spear-chucker with a broad face and big hands… who graduated with a joint First (summa cum laude in US parlance) in a technical discipline from a university in the top two dozen in the world (at the time: my alma mater has slipped in the global rankings in the last 25 years, as its leadership corporatised and tried to emulate UCLA instead of the Ivy League/Oxbridge… like the old joke about the Jewish tailor: never mind the quality, feel the weight).

    Yes, my personal stats are an anecdote, and anecdotes aren’t data… however the hard data says that psych research should be rejected a priori until it’s confirmed by independent research conducted by someone outside the “discipline”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "Well, the “excitement” comes from analysing real data or living and working in some of those shithole countries for years."

    There are many reasons why some countries are "shitholes". European "invade the world, invite the world" machinations certainly did not help matters.

    "There are other factors (stability, infrastructure etc.) but the average IQ rules."

    No, it is one of several factors. Depends upon one's mileage regarding the importance of IQ.

    People like you are completely clueless. You’ve been brainwashed into believing that these people (and their offspring) are no different than Europeans:

    "It simply doesn’t work like that in the real world. Please get yourself a passport and try to experience the world as it is."

    I do. I have been to many places. The people there--white, black, yellow, red, brown--can be kind and considerate, or boorish and rude. Some are extremely gregarious, while others are more reticent. It's called the art of being human and being humane.

    Try it sometime as a break from your routine.

    > The people there–white, black, yellow, red, brown–can be kind and considerate, or boorish and rude. Some are extremely gregarious, while others are more reticent. It’s called the art of being human and being humane.

    That’s a silly argument. No one disputes that individual people vary considerably.

    But when you talk about large groups, averages matter. People are shaped by the society they are part of, but they also in turn shape the society. As their numbers go up, the latter effect is more prevalent than the former.

    As more Africans move into a country, it is reasonable to believe that the country will take on more characteristics of an African country. Do you dispute this fact, or do you welcome it in order to be more humane?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In the West today there are factors at work that are not included in this discussion. Furthermore, some of the factors lead to very different outcomes over time in the real world. I am now 71. When I was in high school there were boys more tall, broad-faced, athletic, well off, and handsome, but there were always shy girls with small tits that we could date. However, with each decade the situation improves for the little guy. Being thin and artistic turned out over the long run to be a much better deal. Playing a major team sport, especially American football, will considerably raise raise the odds statistically of many physical ailments over the years, and the boys who were really one of the guys, on the team, tended to drink a lot more, and for many this became a habit. Over time the number of men who are healthy and available for each healthy woman who is looking for one goes down. Women live longer too. So, when my wife of many years divorced me when I was in my 50s, I suddenly entered a dating scene were there were a lot more attractive, eligible women of my generation than men.

    All around the world men in ancient civilisations that had been literate for millennia were generally married to women who were five years younger. Today in America couples with that five year gap who marry have the highest chance statistically of never divorcing. Instinctively knowing the man should be little older or having learned about it subtly through culture may account for more of the preference for taller men than instinctively preferring tall ones. My wife, to whom I have been married for twelve years, is 66, five years my junior. When we first started living together I said that I probably could not have sex every day, day after day, so why don’t we skip it every forth day for a while, and see how that works. I never had to mention this again; we rarely deviate from the routine. Today when we came in from our daily walk, she said: “I assume this is day three,” meaning: “we are about to go at it again for the third day in a row, but tomorrow we’ll take a rest day.” The guys who really get the most and best sex in the end, and have the most children in the long run, these may well be a gang of short, narrow faced, men who have always been very careful about what they eat and drink. The whole ra ra sports bit the tall boys enjoyed may well have taken more of them off line than their hight advantage increased. And, they are more likely become a Marine or a fighter pilot, reducing survival odds yet again.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jilles dykstra
    The one and only way to judge people morally is by what they do.

    We judge based on the information we have. If the only info you have about someone is that they are a young black man you probably be weary of meeting him on a street at night.

    Now if you know he’s a doctor with a 140 IQ, you won’t be as worried cause you have more data.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Kingfelix
    Nice theory, somewhat undermined by how butt-ugly just about all Americans are.

    Whenever I encounter Yanks in London I am always disappointed that they do not look like Brad Pitt

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Crypto-science!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    People will take your comment seriously. If I could, I would slap your ugly face for sh`tting up the comment section with this.

    Yeah, well, I would tell you to kiss my ass but you probably couldn’t reach it without a step stool.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous

    Ditto linking IQ and race Why the excitement over these things?
     
    Well, the "excitement" comes from analysing real data or living and working in some of those shithole countries for years. I've done both and I can tell you with absolute certainty that average IQ matters. There's a reason why most corporations built their factories in China (105 IQ) instead of India (82 IQ). There are other factors (stability, infrastructure etc.) but the average IQ rules.

    People like you are completely clueless. You've been brainwashed into believing that these people (and their offspring) are no different than Europeans:

    http://novosti.az/media/2016/04/22/lodka_s_migrantami.jpg

    It simply doesn't work like that in the real world. Please get yourself a passport and try to experience the world as it is.

    “Well, the “excitement” comes from analysing real data or living and working in some of those shithole countries for years.”

    There are many reasons why some countries are “shitholes”. European “invade the world, invite the world” machinations certainly did not help matters.

    “There are other factors (stability, infrastructure etc.) but the average IQ rules.”

    No, it is one of several factors. Depends upon one’s mileage regarding the importance of IQ.

    People like you are completely clueless. You’ve been brainwashed into believing that these people (and their offspring) are no different than Europeans:

    “It simply doesn’t work like that in the real world. Please get yourself a passport and try to experience the world as it is.”

    I do. I have been to many places. The people there–white, black, yellow, red, brown–can be kind and considerate, or boorish and rude. Some are extremely gregarious, while others are more reticent. It’s called the art of being human and being humane.

    Try it sometime as a break from your routine.

    Read More
    • Replies: @megabar
    > The people there–white, black, yellow, red, brown–can be kind and considerate, or boorish and rude. Some are extremely gregarious, while others are more reticent. It’s called the art of being human and being humane.

    That's a silly argument. No one disputes that individual people vary considerably.

    But when you talk about large groups, averages matter. People are shaped by the society they are part of, but they also in turn shape the society. As their numbers go up, the latter effect is more prevalent than the former.

    As more Africans move into a country, it is reasonable to believe that the country will take on more characteristics of an African country. Do you dispute this fact, or do you welcome it in order to be more humane?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous

    Ditto linking IQ and race Why the excitement over these things?
     
    Well, the "excitement" comes from analysing real data or living and working in some of those shithole countries for years. I've done both and I can tell you with absolute certainty that average IQ matters. There's a reason why most corporations built their factories in China (105 IQ) instead of India (82 IQ). There are other factors (stability, infrastructure etc.) but the average IQ rules.

    People like you are completely clueless. You've been brainwashed into believing that these people (and their offspring) are no different than Europeans:

    http://novosti.az/media/2016/04/22/lodka_s_migrantami.jpg

    It simply doesn't work like that in the real world. Please get yourself a passport and try to experience the world as it is.

    No one in that boat will write a string quartet.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    People with squarer forehead shape.... when looked from the front, are more logical minded.

    People with different sized/shaped top row and bottom row of teeth have more unbalanced personalities. Same with people whose head slants towards one side or the other.

    People with sharper canine teeth along with the people who have a protruding mouth when looked from the side, are also more aggressive but cannot handle others aggression as good.

    The length of the nose of a person determines how much careful a person is regarding smaller amounts of money too not just big amounts. The longer the nose the more value they give to it too. They are also the least likely to be lazy.

    Regarding bodily hairiness, i remember reading that high IQ people were found in a 5:1 ratio among more hirsute men as compared to 9:1 among less hirsute men. I think this was a within a race finding.

    People with square jaws or jaws that jut out of the side of the face have a higher tendency to get turned on when people try to change them in a non-threatening way, if they see it as useful for their personal benefit.

    They are also more open to good suggestions from other people if they see those as useful to them or their career/business etc. Round faced people seem the opposite regarding this particular point.

    People with a sharper nose tip are more irritable and aggressive but are also weaker in personality. They are very stronger in offence but weaker in defense. Similar to people with sharper canine teeth i suppose. They also seem to be more easily influenced.

    People with eyes large relative to their face have a greater tendency to take things more personally. Or take more things personally. People with lips larger relative to their face have a greater tendency to react more emotionally.

    People with a depression or a hole? on their chin are more persistent. People with similar on their cheeks....they get this when they are laughing or smiling ....are more cheerful. People with a butt-looking chin... people like me XD.... i dont know. I guess we are more interested in abstract stuff than other people are. As this kind of interest led me to make all this observations.

    People with a downward turned mouth when on a neutral face/mouth expression i mean sides of the mouth downward, are usually more pessimistic. People with an upward turned mouth are the opposite.

    People with round faces have a faster all round intelligence.

    People with deep-seated eyes are slow thinkers but think things more deeply. No pun intended. Same with people with long necks. They think about fewer things but think more deeply about them. People with protruding eyes are mentally quicker and have a wider range of thoughts. But are not as deep a thinkers. People with eyes that are neither too deep or protruding are intermediate between these two groups.

    People with protruding cheekbones are more crafty . Or have a higher tendency to see everybody and everything they do as craftiness and become crafty themselves.

    People with longer limbs are more style conscious.

    People with teeth showing even in a semi closed mouth have a higher tendency to finger others.

    Men with smaller penises value sex lesser than men with longer penises.

    People with downward-and -forward facing jaws have the best leadership abilities.

    Probably true. Absolutely hilarious.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous[232] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lincoln Blockface Squarebeard III

    Rely on intuition.
     
    Agree. Reliable intuition is invaluable and many people (particularly men) just don't have it which leaves them at a disadvantage in social situations. The same with empathy, very useful and not only do people suck at it but they often don't even know what it means. Sherlock Holmes, for example, had very strong empathy. But ask the average American to describe it and he'll give you a description of compassion. Not the same thing at all.

    Judging people based on physical traits alone just isn't very reliable and soon the "exceptions" to the "rule" begin to pile up. Which is why I don't get why some folks are so passionate about it. Ditto linking IQ and race Why the excitement over these things?. Does it get them laid or increase their access to valuable resources? As a hobby it's beyond boring and in practical terms it's all but useless. Whatever gets you through the night I suppose.

    Ditto linking IQ and race Why the excitement over these things?

    Well, the “excitement” comes from analysing real data or living and working in some of those shithole countries for years. I’ve done both and I can tell you with absolute certainty that average IQ matters. There’s a reason why most corporations built their factories in China (105 IQ) instead of India (82 IQ). There are other factors (stability, infrastructure etc.) but the average IQ rules.

    People like you are completely clueless. You’ve been brainwashed into believing that these people (and their offspring) are no different than Europeans:

    It simply doesn’t work like that in the real world. Please get yourself a passport and try to experience the world as it is.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ricpic
    No one in that boat will write a string quartet.
    , @Corvinus
    "Well, the “excitement” comes from analysing real data or living and working in some of those shithole countries for years."

    There are many reasons why some countries are "shitholes". European "invade the world, invite the world" machinations certainly did not help matters.

    "There are other factors (stability, infrastructure etc.) but the average IQ rules."

    No, it is one of several factors. Depends upon one's mileage regarding the importance of IQ.

    People like you are completely clueless. You’ve been brainwashed into believing that these people (and their offspring) are no different than Europeans:

    "It simply doesn’t work like that in the real world. Please get yourself a passport and try to experience the world as it is."

    I do. I have been to many places. The people there--white, black, yellow, red, brown--can be kind and considerate, or boorish and rude. Some are extremely gregarious, while others are more reticent. It's called the art of being human and being humane.

    Try it sometime as a break from your routine.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Based on my observations and readings (not going to dig out links), women select for intelligence in men only up to a certain point; say, up to one standard deviation above the median; as you go higher up the male IQ scale, the tide turns, as women begin to select against higher male intelligence. Very high IQ men, at 2+ SD’s above, are mostly shunned by women.

    Women don’t tend to tingle for men with 140ish IQ’s unless those guys are simultaneously blessed with marked dark triad traits, height, and good looks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous[213] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus
    "These are based on my personal observation."

    Which is in effect your opinion. Which, like any opinion, may be influenced by confirmation bias.

    theoretically. But it doesnt mean it is always true in practice.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    These are based on my personal observation.

    I guess i should have written this along with the comment.

    “These are based on my personal observation.”

    Which is in effect your opinion. Which, like any opinion, may be influenced by confirmation bias.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    theoretically. But it doesnt mean it is always true in practice.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    Great laundry list, but you're going to have to provide links for each component as evidence that each physical attribute and their corresponding personality trait is "correct" or "matches up". You have a lot of work to do.

    These are based on my personal observation.

    I guess i should have written this along with the comment.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "These are based on my personal observation."

    Which is in effect your opinion. Which, like any opinion, may be influenced by confirmation bias.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @AaronB
    It's always amusing to me how philosophy and popular culture hasn't caught up to Darwinism.

    One of the key insights of Darwinism is that our minds have not evolved to know truth but only survive. If we evolved to be religious, this implies there is a higher standpoint from which we can judge whether it's true. But our minds have not evolved to give us truth, so we could never judge whether religion is true. Any answer obtained through our cognitive processes would necessarily be the product of evolutionary processes not designed to give us truth.

    All our knowledge are 'useful fictions', according to Darwinism. If that belief helps you design a functioning airplane, great. If that religious belief helps you cope with psychological realities, great. Epistomelogically there is no difference between the two.

    I find it amusing when 'scientists' use Darwin and 'truth' in the same sentence.

    As for this book, if we evolved to naturally read people, we certainly don't need it! As with all such 'science', it's conclusions are probably mostly bullshit or so many counterexample in real life that go against the 'statistical trends' as to be useless.

    Rely on intuition.

    Rely on intuition.

    Agree. Reliable intuition is invaluable and many people (particularly men) just don’t have it which leaves them at a disadvantage in social situations. The same with empathy, very useful and not only do people suck at it but they often don’t even know what it means. Sherlock Holmes, for example, had very strong empathy. But ask the average American to describe it and he’ll give you a description of compassion. Not the same thing at all.

    Judging people based on physical traits alone just isn’t very reliable and soon the “exceptions” to the “rule” begin to pile up. Which is why I don’t get why some folks are so passionate about it. Ditto linking IQ and race Why the excitement over these things?. Does it get them laid or increase their access to valuable resources? As a hobby it’s beyond boring and in practical terms it’s all but useless. Whatever gets you through the night I suppose.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    Ditto linking IQ and race Why the excitement over these things?
     
    Well, the "excitement" comes from analysing real data or living and working in some of those shithole countries for years. I've done both and I can tell you with absolute certainty that average IQ matters. There's a reason why most corporations built their factories in China (105 IQ) instead of India (82 IQ). There are other factors (stability, infrastructure etc.) but the average IQ rules.

    People like you are completely clueless. You've been brainwashed into believing that these people (and their offspring) are no different than Europeans:

    http://novosti.az/media/2016/04/22/lodka_s_migrantami.jpg

    It simply doesn't work like that in the real world. Please get yourself a passport and try to experience the world as it is.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anarchyst
    You are wrong Corvinus. Your communist nature is showing. The right to choose who one associates with is a basic HUMAN right that was abolished with the passage of the so-called "civil-rights" acts, BUT ONLY FOR WHITES. You see, according to the so-called "U S Department of Justice" (actually "just us", only whites can be "racist" as "people of color do not have political or social power--(their words exactly).
    As to segregation, whites and blacks lost a lot when desegregation was forced on us at the point of bayonets. Blacks WERE coming along just fine, BEFORE the imposition of "civil-rights" laws.
    I was there during the so-called "civil-rights" demonstrations of the 1960s and observed much criminal behavior that never got reported. You see, then as is now, the news media, communists and their fellow travelers had an agenda of their own and as such, could not "let a crisis go to waste". The rapes, robberies, and the general trashing of the areas they occupied were never reported. Only the reactions of the local citizenry and law enforcement to the lawless behavior of the "demonstrators" was reported...
    These demonstrations were not peaceful by any means, the demonstrators being "egged on" by their new york-based jewish "carpetbagger" handlers. The locals, both black and white, wanted NOTHING to do with these "outsiders" coming into their peaceful communities, only to cause trouble.
    I WAS THERE, and personally witnesses the criminal activity by these so-called "civil-rights (for some)" pioneers...
    We are living with the results to this very day...

    There are no “human rights”. Man is a social animal: his rights stem from the society of which he is part. The expression “civil rights” is not a bad stab at acknowledging this fact.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Any experienced salesman knows this. The faster you can figure out the type of person you are selling to the more success you will have. All people inevitably present themselves in a way that aligns with their fundamental tastes and values systems.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Svigor

    which argues that even within races and sexes you can, with a fair degree of accuracy, infer people’s personalities from appearances.
     
    Science catches up with me again.

    What a Dx king homo name

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Inaugurating her Politically Correct remake of National Geographic, Editrix-In-Chief Susan Goldberg wrote recently: “Some of what you find in our archives leaves you speechless, like a 1916 story about Australia. Underneath photos of two Aboriginal people, the caption reads: ‘South Australian Blackfellows: These savages rank lowest in intelligence of all human beings.’” [Link in original]....
  • @Svigor
    It's an ecological thing. Hunter gatherers, nomads, agricultural civilizations, these things can't share space. White-haters, darkie-lovers, Russian flatheads like FB, etc., they aren't bright enough to know they're "retconning" the values of an agricultural civilization onto the other kinds when they talk about "stealing land from the abos" or whatever. Whitey no more stole Australia and the Americas from the aboriginals than the aboriginals stole it in the first place. That's how land ownership is established in hunter-gatherer and nomad societies; whichever band/tribe can defend a territory is the owner. If another group comes along and drives them off, the newcomers are the new owners. This is obviously the law that governed the aboriginals' reality. More of a physical or natural law than any mans'. By the aboriginals' own customs, Whitey is now the rightful owner.

    Agreed, and would go even farther and say that “whichever band/tribe can defend a territory is the owner” applied to pretty much every culture up until we made enough weaponry/deterrance/mutual profit to minimize border and internal warfare post WW2. Therefore, you cannot retroactively apply modern human rights and standards of “not stealing land” on older situations that have been resolved to one end for generations, since the modern world’s boundaries are currently enforced by total war, MAD, and relatively larger states (with larger dependence on peaceful foreign trade – the type and degree is another subject, that can go wrong too) with heavier internal policing. None of those things existed, or did in a much lesser degree, during the Age of Western Discovery/Expansion.

    Whenever you do try retconning, you can only do so in relatively lesser matters, for example teaching natives their ancestral languages – they will still have to learn to read and write, something that for example nearly no Amerinds did up until 500 years ago in any language. The evil priests of all people were the first to teach them, thus keeping their languages alive (if only as a side effect of forced conversion, but still).

    Besides, this standard of “no land stealing” is applied in schizophrenic ways, only to convenience of the globalist elite really – for example, most of the Western world considers Kosovo a nation (its current boundaries set up as an autonomous province under Tito a few decades ago), or desires Catalonia or Scotland to be independent states because they last were independent centuries ago but pledge to love the EU (or the euro, rather). Meanwhile we don’t mind the Afrikaner being displaced from land they have been at for several generations, because the descendants of West African Bantus had invaded before that and feel aggrieved they don’t have total domination over the Bushmen and pygmies as they used to…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @bike-anarkist
    "If a particular group thinks that their belief system is the best way to survive and prosper, cut them loose so they can prove it. Give the aborigines 3% of Australia’s land and leave them alone."

    Actually, give them the whole of Aus and the whiteys can go back to wherever they came from... because whiteys can't leave anything alone.

    Would then Australian whites count as a homeless population, therefore achieving victim status, and therefore worthy of signs such as “they can have my bed” as they parade around camps everywhere?

    All assuming that the aborigines aren’t overtaken by another foreign power of a different race than them. As they nearly were when yellow Japan and others tried to invade throughout history. Do you think Hideki Tojo’s armies would have been any more merciful to them than to the Chinese ladies of Nanjing? What about earlier examples, such as Mohammed’s faithful that literally wanted to raze the world for their god? BTW, they got pretty close to them, having spread to Indonesia (ask East Timor how that went).

    But hey, let’s blame whitey – using computers.

    If we’re all equal, then we should all equally use logic…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    So is there an alliance potentiality along the lines of "caucus with us and cut out the middle man" or/and, "support all traditional lifestyles and communities...you support ours , we'll support yours" ?

    Pretty much. Westerners who want to defend their culture(s) should by the same token understand the non-Western peoples who want to keep their cultures alive. The key is in the degree of separation – not too much as not to grow uninformed, then suspicious and then hostile of motives of the Other, but not as little so as to destroy the way of life of either of the cultures by mixing with potentially volatile results. It happens in chemistry, it happens in life. Those who advocate for a global culture seek destruction of all national cultures, not just white ones. You could say that the non-white ones are supported more by Western leftists because of vengeful/masochistic reasons – but even then, the left in South America brought nothing more than phony revivals of folk culture for the natives; if anything, whenever natives achieve “success” as measured by leftists (usually education and welfare coverage, as if that was all there was to life), it is when they are more Westernized than ever before. Look at Evo Morales, his favorite pastime is the English Victorian sport of soccer, learned nationalization of resources and state ownership of means of production from Western leftist authors, and he defends the coca leaf growers that tangentially feed the producers of a certain white substance loved in the West. Not to mention, his vice-president who does most of the policy is a lefty white Hispanic.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @peterAUS

    The full blood aborigines I’ve had involvement with are certainly far less intelligent than whites. The problem isn’t money or the government supplying housing and so on. It’s that their traditional society is gone forever but they are congenitally incompatible with modern life.

    Honestly the best prospect for aborigines is a genuinely caring white paternalism. Unfortunately the Left is in love with virtue signalling more than they like fixing things and the Right are scaredy cats afraid of the word ‘racist’.

    And on the topic of intelligence, too many whites lack the intelligence and wisdom to understand that taking responsibility for the plight of aborigines means taking control.
     
    Good post.

    This is , IMHO, of a peculiar importance:

    It’s that their traditional society is gone forever but they are congenitally incompatible with modern life.
     
    and applies to many other groups in West.

    The prevalent dogma is to preserve, as much as possible, "native" culture.
    At the same time that very culture is incompatible with the modern society.

    It's schizophrenic, actually. Can't find another explanation, for true believers, that is.

    If only those pushing for it were paying the price for that lunacy. The problem is, they push it onto all of the society.

    The desire to “preserve native culture” while remaining at the cusp of Western culture as Leftist intellectuals, is as bourgeois and hypocritical a Leftist tenet as there can be. It’s a sentimental reaction, half of it born from cultural emptiness, and half of it from the pure sense of bourgeois novelty. Akin to the vegans who want to keep all animals alive because their particular cats give them the fuzzies, nonwithstanding the fact that their cats are in effect personal slaves to them (if not the reverse, them being slaves to the cat, which is worse of course).

    All those lefty intellectuals, how not to love them. In Andean South America they love visiting the jungle tribes, or the highland valleys, get sick from all the bad water, overspend like crazy at natural resorts and/or nativewear that is significantly overpriced just for them – the same shoes or hats or ponchos sold between natives, and the same beach tours, themselves cost much less for locals. They do much more drugs and alcohol in those trips than said natives ever will in their lives, while gorging on much more food than the average native thanks to exchange rates – yet they often talk when they come back about their “enlightening experiences” (ayahuasca/peyote trip nonwithstanding). And then said lefty individuals rail against every Western corporation that they perceive overcharges or treats animals unfairly, while natives kill every being on sight if and how needed be; in the Andes they eat guinea pigs by impaling them and braising them over the fire, make soups with animal blood, and shoot endangered condors if they mess with their livestock. Not to mention, the harsh corporal punishment justice system they have, which Auschwitz guards would have liked; a petty thief gets 50 whips with harsh poisonous ivy in front of the populace. All of this is treated as “ooh so exotic” by leftists who wouldn’t dare to live that way ever.

    Thus I agree. If you really are for preserving such a distinct culture, keep it separated from yours.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Unless it involves mocking President Trump’s supposedly “small hands,” there is nothing that horrifies our multiculturalist masters more than judging by appearances. It is impossible, they claim, to infer anything about how someone is likely to behave by their gender or because they are from a particular ethnic group. Everyone is unique (but also, somehow,...
  • Boring Darwinism. Just another plank needed to justify the future genocide of the “dirty non-white people”, and keep that annoying Judeo-Christian God–that cheek-turning pussy–out of their way.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Inaugurating her Politically Correct remake of National Geographic, Editrix-In-Chief Susan Goldberg wrote recently: “Some of what you find in our archives leaves you speechless, like a 1916 story about Australia. Underneath photos of two Aboriginal people, the caption reads: ‘South Australian Blackfellows: These savages rank lowest in intelligence of all human beings.’” [Link in original]....
  • @Not_One_of_You
    Greene's book was published in 1955 and the book uses Greene's experiences as a war correspondent for The Times and Le Figaro in French Indochina 1951–1954. It is therefore anecdotal rather than fiction.

    I don't give a rat's ass if "decent employees" of the CIA feel insulted, bearing in mind the individuals involved are all dead in this case. I just hope they were cremated. It's an insult to the good earth to expect it to contain their remains and deservedly they should be rated in history alongside Stalin's henchmen and Hitler's camp guards.

    Denial is ultimately an unsatisfying remedy for shame and disgrace, especially when denial sits in uncomfortable juxtaposition with hard evidence. I don't mean shame and disgrace in respect of the US defeat (by which I mean forced withdrawal). The war was fought with valor on both sides

    America was still great during the Vietnam War and the greatness of the American public and their sense of fairness and decency was instrumental in the outcome. That was Vietnam.

    The outcome would have been much better for all Americans, even leftists, if the US hadn’t been forced to withdraw the way it did. Now the ghost of Vietnam haunts everyone, even when it shouldn’t.

    Not to mention, the present Vietnam is better by acquiring some degree of Westernization and some degree of freedom from their former CCP/CCCP handlers. Would it have been better if South Vietnam had won the war? Maybe, though Ho Chi Minh was perhaps too popular. It was a stupid war to get into anyway – and one that was started by the putative leftist American party. Originally American right wingers were isolationists – wouldn’t you prefer that?

    It’s funny what you say about the CIA – for what it’s worth, the same amount of “anecdotal evidence” used to be pointed all the time at the KGB, Mossad, the Elders of Zion, etc. There’s one thing called denial, and the other extreme, fantasy. As a South American, I’ve seen both ends – the CIA and US bipartisan think tanks love the elite parties, while pretty much every lefty was fed by the colleges which were in turn either ruled by Beijing- or Moscow- or Havana- funded student orgs and teachers’ unions and guerrillas and Marxist-Leninist movements (anecdotal evidence from dad who was in student government in a South American college in the messy 80s – he saw paramilitaries hunting dissidents, and on the other end, student groups getting classes shut at least half of the school year every year. FWIW).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Unless it involves mocking President Trump’s supposedly “small hands,” there is nothing that horrifies our multiculturalist masters more than judging by appearances. It is impossible, they claim, to infer anything about how someone is likely to behave by their gender or because they are from a particular ethnic group. Everyone is unique (but also, somehow,...
  • @Che Guava
    Wally.

    You are trying to be really irritating. However, I am an old hand at tolerating trolls, let alone your brand of misrepresentation, on the 'net.

    i. Give me one example where I refuted anything of yours.

    ii. How am I 'whining for moderator intervention'?

    Could continue, but no point, you are clearly a fantasist (no, not in terms of your overly repeated links, etc.) as a person, and, to avoid repetition, a cretin.

    You are quite incompetent and without substance.

    i. Indeed, that’s my point. You have not / cannot refute the information that I post.
    You simply dodge & whine.

    ii. Read your previous posts where you invoke the moderator, I’m not going to continuously spoon feed you.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Troll: Che Guava
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Inaugurating her Politically Correct remake of National Geographic, Editrix-In-Chief Susan Goldberg wrote recently: “Some of what you find in our archives leaves you speechless, like a 1916 story about Australia. Underneath photos of two Aboriginal people, the caption reads: ‘South Australian Blackfellows: These savages rank lowest in intelligence of all human beings.’” [Link in original]....
  • @Not_One_of_You
    Bobbi Sykes' mother has revealed that her father was an African-American soldier, Master-Sergeant Robert Barkley. Bobbi (born in 1943) never knew him.

    A person of color growing up in Townsville, Queensland (a military base) would have been assumed to be Aboriginal and would have identified herself as such.

    Bobbi had a fine intellect. Sykes received a PhD in Education from Harvard University in 1983. She distinguished herself by being an author, a journalist and an activist in indigenous rights struggles. In 1994 she was awarded the Australian Human Rights Medal.

    Her potential was somewhat unfulfilled, but she doesn't deserve to be smeared and her mother smeared by some anonymous dogshite blogger who can only imagine a pseudonym "anon" and whose only claim to anything at all is some distant past inheritance of albino genes.

    There are always the “successful” ones, aka the ones promoted to do agitprop because they can read the Manifesto properly and/0r read and write extensively. It’s often the case that these people tend to do better in less maths-influenced fields.
    And also, they almost always tend to be mixed. Indigenous “authors” and “leaders” among the Amerinds tend to always be Westernized to a good degree.

    Anonymous dogshite blogger describes all of us here, don’t feel superior – well, then again, you cannot help it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Not_One_of_You
    I'll put it simply for you DFH.

    Europeans are more "tuned" intellectually by their heritage and upbringing to do IQ tests.

    The fact that genetic characteristics coincide with environmentally induced characteristics is unremarkable but not causal because genetic characteristics evolve over long timespans while environmental features can change within a few years.

    I very much doubt from the composition of Australian sports teams that they are better at sports. I have seen evidence that they, like eskimoes, are better than whites at the very specific task of spatial memory and navigation.
     
    Your doubt is irrelevant. Many indigenous athletes are at the top in games like football and some also have won Olympic medals. Dancers too and tennis players. They don't go in for sports like golf for obvious reasons (think ... Donald Chump!)

    The crux of your argument is “they’re not stupid, just different, and they will get better”.

    The key question is, how much better can they get? The Australian government has been far more generous than other guilty former colonizers, and while some advance has been achieved, yet most of the modern successful counterexamples you give are sports figures. And American blacks rule the NBA, what is the point? Cherrypicking goes both ways.

    Not to mention, if they are just different, why not just wall them off and leave them alone? Why the guilt trip about trying to “close the gap”, if there is no gap, just differences?

    PS.- All those sports, invented by Victorians ironically, in remembrance of earlier whites that built whole arenas for sports – as in, sport was valued THAT much. Same for dancing, a universal activity, but made into its current shape by the Western establishment (and brown and black rhythm as of late). Should the aborigines be grateful then that they were offered an exit to their poverty by the way of physical competitions that cater to their strengths?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Not_One_of_You
    Malthus was concerned with the fear of over-population by the dependent poor. Karl Marx referred to Malthus' thinking as "nothing more than a schoolboyish, superficial plagiary of De Foe, Sir James Steuart, Townsend, Franklin, Wallace".

    Nowadays, most nominally capitalist regimes regard population growth as intrinsic to financial growth but also regard non-productive groups and classes as adverse to financial growth.

    Hence the around 43 million Americans that live below the poverty line. It's not just the likes of Aborigines who are seen as deadweight on society and despised as deserving of their fate.

    As for the Hakkas you mention; "The Hakkas, sometimes Hakka Han, are Han Chinese people whose ancestral homes are chiefly in the Hakka-speaking provincial areas of Guangdong, Fujian, Jiangxi, Guangxi, Sichuan, Hunan, Zhejiang, Hainan and Guizhou".

    You may be thinking of Makassan fishermen from what is now Indonesia with whom Aborigines in the north of Australia traded, but on a friendly basis. The areas where European diseases erupted two years after the invasion of the First Fleet were right around Sydney, on the south east corner of Australia, where the First Fleet set up the colony and where there were definitely no "Hakkas" and no other outside carriers of pestilence either.

    And yet those Americans live better than any aborigine.
    And the equivalent of aborigines in other parts of the world, whether colonized by whites or not, always live terribly. Black and Asian pastoralists were displaced by agricultural people of their own color in the first place.
    Fair enough about historical tragedies – can they stunt a population forever, however?
    I cannot help but feel sympathy (as a descendant of both conquistadors and their enslaved Amerindians). Also, IQ differences are more noticeable on extremes of the curve, most people are similarly enough to each other – not without problems, but fair enough. But, if every single problem is the fault of events of centuries ago and money and guilt thrown at it moves the needle and closes the gap way too slowly if at all, then I don’t know what to tell you. I can only offer the anecdotal evidence I have from Amerindians – better to leave them to their own devices, to let them have what they value; rather than impose artificial Western lifestyle and/or pretend that inside each one of them there is a globalist techie dying to get out.
    Also… Malthus a schoolboy but Marx not?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Unless it involves mocking President Trump’s supposedly “small hands,” there is nothing that horrifies our multiculturalist masters more than judging by appearances. It is impossible, they claim, to infer anything about how someone is likely to behave by their gender or because they are from a particular ethnic group. Everyone is unique (but also, somehow,...
  • @Wally
    said:
    "The only similarly repetitive thing among commentors on this site is Wally, with the CODOH link on every post. "

    Say what? Talk about off topic.

    Oh my, someone got a whipping.

    And there Che Guava goes again, advocating censorship.

    Interesting since the numerous & quite varied posts I make he cannot refute. That's why his panties are in a twist. Now he whines for moderator intervention.

    This drives the irrational True Believers such as Che Guava crazy:


    Only Liars Want Censorship
    www.codoh.com
    debate here: http://forum.codoh.com
     

    Wally.

    You are trying to be really irritating. However, I am an old hand at tolerating trolls, let alone your brand of misrepresentation, on the ‘net.

    i. Give me one example where I refuted anything of yours.

    ii. How am I ‘whining for moderator intervention’?

    Could continue, but no point, you are clearly a fantasist (no, not in terms of your overly repeated links, etc.) as a person, and, to avoid repetition, a cretin.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    You are quite incompetent and without substance.

    i. Indeed, that's my point. You have not / cannot refute the information that I post.
    You simply dodge & whine.

    ii. Read your previous posts where you invoke the moderator, I'm not going to continuously spoon feed you.

    www.codoh.com

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Could say much on this. Only three things now.

    Clearly, sociopaths and psychopaths have attractive exteriors as stock in trade.

    Two days ago, was receiving a beaming smile from a young boy with Down’s, in return for a cheerful face from me. Like a glimpse of the sun on a rainy day.

    The line from the ancient Devo song, Mongoloid

    Happier than you and me

    came to mind.

    Mongies have much shorter lives on average, but in my several encounters with them, they really are happier. Perhaps because most are not able to be conscious of their own mortality, a blessing for them.

    Final point, you can tell evil from somebody who never makes eye contact, or has, as Americans say (or used to say) ‘shifty eyes’.

    Of course, some damaged people also cannot stand eye contact.

    The difference is that the former type are able to do it when, and only when, it is involving some type of gain.

    Much more to say on this thread, but it is already overcrowded, so leaving it at that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Che Guava
    ... and in every post. I told him it is very boring and not worth repeating long ago, seriously, from the posts, it seems AJM found a special needs branch of MENSA,

    A mod. told him to cut it out over a year ago, no effect.

    The only similarly repetitive thing among commentors on this site is Wally, with the CODOH link on every post. In response to a comment from me, Wally did briefly control his compulsion. At least Wally's compulsion is not just a chest-thumping boast.

    said:
    “The only similarly repetitive thing among commentors on this site is Wally, with the CODOH link on every post. ”

    Say what? Talk about off topic.

    Oh my, someone got a whipping.

    And there Che Guava goes again, advocating censorship.

    Interesting since the numerous & quite varied posts I make he cannot refute. That’s why his panties are in a twist. Now he whines for moderator intervention.

    This drives the irrational True Believers such as Che Guava crazy:

    Only Liars Want Censorship
    http://www.codoh.com
    debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Wally.

    You are trying to be really irritating. However, I am an old hand at tolerating trolls, let alone your brand of misrepresentation, on the 'net.

    i. Give me one example where I refuted anything of yours.

    ii. How am I 'whining for moderator intervention'?

    Could continue, but no point, you are clearly a fantasist (no, not in terms of your overly repeated links, etc.) as a person, and, to avoid repetition, a cretin.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    "Women with large buttocks were found to be introverted, self-abasing, and high in guilt. "
    The Kardashians, J-Lo, Beyoncé, Demi Lovato?

    Big ass ghetto chicks “introverted, self-abasing, and high in guilt”?

    Seriously?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Refreshing the U.S. history: “A Conversation on Race,” by Paul Craig Roberts

    https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/04/18/conversation-race-paul-craig-roberts/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    People with squarer forehead shape.... when looked from the front, are more logical minded.

    People with different sized/shaped top row and bottom row of teeth have more unbalanced personalities. Same with people whose head slants towards one side or the other.

    People with sharper canine teeth along with the people who have a protruding mouth when looked from the side, are also more aggressive but cannot handle others aggression as good.

    The length of the nose of a person determines how much careful a person is regarding smaller amounts of money too not just big amounts. The longer the nose the more value they give to it too. They are also the least likely to be lazy.

    Regarding bodily hairiness, i remember reading that high IQ people were found in a 5:1 ratio among more hirsute men as compared to 9:1 among less hirsute men. I think this was a within a race finding.

    People with square jaws or jaws that jut out of the side of the face have a higher tendency to get turned on when people try to change them in a non-threatening way, if they see it as useful for their personal benefit.

    They are also more open to good suggestions from other people if they see those as useful to them or their career/business etc. Round faced people seem the opposite regarding this particular point.

    People with a sharper nose tip are more irritable and aggressive but are also weaker in personality. They are very stronger in offence but weaker in defense. Similar to people with sharper canine teeth i suppose. They also seem to be more easily influenced.

    People with eyes large relative to their face have a greater tendency to take things more personally. Or take more things personally. People with lips larger relative to their face have a greater tendency to react more emotionally.

    People with a depression or a hole? on their chin are more persistent. People with similar on their cheeks....they get this when they are laughing or smiling ....are more cheerful. People with a butt-looking chin... people like me XD.... i dont know. I guess we are more interested in abstract stuff than other people are. As this kind of interest led me to make all this observations.

    People with a downward turned mouth when on a neutral face/mouth expression i mean sides of the mouth downward, are usually more pessimistic. People with an upward turned mouth are the opposite.

    People with round faces have a faster all round intelligence.

    People with deep-seated eyes are slow thinkers but think things more deeply. No pun intended. Same with people with long necks. They think about fewer things but think more deeply about them. People with protruding eyes are mentally quicker and have a wider range of thoughts. But are not as deep a thinkers. People with eyes that are neither too deep or protruding are intermediate between these two groups.

    People with protruding cheekbones are more crafty . Or have a higher tendency to see everybody and everything they do as craftiness and become crafty themselves.

    People with longer limbs are more style conscious.

    People with teeth showing even in a semi closed mouth have a higher tendency to finger others.

    Men with smaller penises value sex lesser than men with longer penises.

    People with downward-and -forward facing jaws have the best leadership abilities.

    Great laundry list, but you’re going to have to provide links for each component as evidence that each physical attribute and their corresponding personality trait is “correct” or “matches up”. You have a lot of work to do.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    These are based on my personal observation.

    I guess i should have written this along with the comment.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @WhiteWolf
    He's mensa, army vet and a pro jazz player and feels the need to tell us about it. That shows low self esteem more than anything. At least he's considered not boring by African women.

    … and in every post. I told him it is very boring and not worth repeating long ago, seriously, from the posts, it seems AJM found a special needs branch of MENSA,

    A mod. told him to cut it out over a year ago, no effect.

    The only similarly repetitive thing among commentors on this site is Wally, with the CODOH link on every post. In response to a comment from me, Wally did briefly control his compulsion. At least Wally’s compulsion is not just a chest-thumping boast.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    said:
    "The only similarly repetitive thing among commentors on this site is Wally, with the CODOH link on every post. "

    Say what? Talk about off topic.

    Oh my, someone got a whipping.

    And there Che Guava goes again, advocating censorship.

    Interesting since the numerous & quite varied posts I make he cannot refute. That's why his panties are in a twist. Now he whines for moderator intervention.

    This drives the irrational True Believers such as Che Guava crazy:


    Only Liars Want Censorship
    www.codoh.com
    debate here: http://forum.codoh.com
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous[422] • Disclaimer says:

    People with squarer forehead shape…. when looked from the front, are more logical minded.

    People with different sized/shaped top row and bottom row of teeth have more unbalanced personalities. Same with people whose head slants towards one side or the other.

    People with sharper canine teeth along with the people who have a protruding mouth when looked from the side, are also more aggressive but cannot handle others aggression as good.

    The length of the nose of a person determines how much careful a person is regarding smaller amounts of money too not just big amounts. The longer the nose the more value they give to it too. They are also the least likely to be lazy.

    Regarding bodily hairiness, i remember reading that high IQ people were found in a 5:1 ratio among more hirsute men as compared to 9:1 among less hirsute men. I think this was a within a race finding.

    People with square jaws or jaws that jut out of the side of the face have a higher tendency to get turned on when people try to change them in a non-threatening way, if they see it as useful for their personal benefit.

    They are also more open to good suggestions from other people if they see those as useful to them or their career/business etc. Round faced people seem the opposite regarding this particular point.

    People with a sharper nose tip are more irritable and aggressive but are also weaker in personality. They are very stronger in offence but weaker in defense. Similar to people with sharper canine teeth i suppose. They also seem to be more easily influenced.

    People with eyes large relative to their face have a greater tendency to take things more personally. Or take more things personally. People with lips larger relative to their face have a greater tendency to react more emotionally.

    People with a depression or a hole? on their chin are more persistent. People with similar on their cheeks….they get this when they are laughing or smiling ….are more cheerful. People with a butt-looking chin… people like me XD…. i dont know. I guess we are more interested in abstract stuff than other people are. As this kind of interest led me to make all this observations.

    People with a downward turned mouth when on a neutral face/mouth expression i mean sides of the mouth downward, are usually more pessimistic. People with an upward turned mouth are the opposite.

    People with round faces have a faster all round intelligence.

    People with deep-seated eyes are slow thinkers but think things more deeply. No pun intended. Same with people with long necks. They think about fewer things but think more deeply about them. People with protruding eyes are mentally quicker and have a wider range of thoughts. But are not as deep a thinkers. People with eyes that are neither too deep or protruding are intermediate between these two groups.

    People with protruding cheekbones are more crafty . Or have a higher tendency to see everybody and everything they do as craftiness and become crafty themselves.

    People with longer limbs are more style conscious.

    People with teeth showing even in a semi closed mouth have a higher tendency to finger others.

    Men with smaller penises value sex lesser than men with longer penises.

    People with downward-and -forward facing jaws have the best leadership abilities.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    Great laundry list, but you're going to have to provide links for each component as evidence that each physical attribute and their corresponding personality trait is "correct" or "matches up". You have a lot of work to do.
    , @ricpic
    Probably true. Absolutely hilarious.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anarchyst
    You are wrong Corvinus. Your communist nature is showing. The right to choose who one associates with is a basic HUMAN right that was abolished with the passage of the so-called "civil-rights" acts, BUT ONLY FOR WHITES. You see, according to the so-called "U S Department of Justice" (actually "just us", only whites can be "racist" as "people of color do not have political or social power--(their words exactly).
    As to segregation, whites and blacks lost a lot when desegregation was forced on us at the point of bayonets. Blacks WERE coming along just fine, BEFORE the imposition of "civil-rights" laws.
    I was there during the so-called "civil-rights" demonstrations of the 1960s and observed much criminal behavior that never got reported. You see, then as is now, the news media, communists and their fellow travelers had an agenda of their own and as such, could not "let a crisis go to waste". The rapes, robberies, and the general trashing of the areas they occupied were never reported. Only the reactions of the local citizenry and law enforcement to the lawless behavior of the "demonstrators" was reported...
    These demonstrations were not peaceful by any means, the demonstrators being "egged on" by their new york-based jewish "carpetbagger" handlers. The locals, both black and white, wanted NOTHING to do with these "outsiders" coming into their peaceful communities, only to cause trouble.
    I WAS THERE, and personally witnesses the criminal activity by these so-called "civil-rights (for some)" pioneers...
    We are living with the results to this very day...

    “You are wrong Corvinus. Your communist nature is showing.”

    It is not communist for citizens to request that their government guarantee their basic freedoms.

    “The right to choose who one associates with is a basic HUMAN right that was abolished with the passage of the so-called “civil-rights” acts, BUT ONLY FOR WHITES.”

    You have every liberty to choose who you associate with. The problem is that the southron community had dictated to individual white southerners that it was illegal to marry or sell their homes to black southerners.

    “Blacks WERE coming along just fine, BEFORE the imposition of “civil-rights” laws.”

    Another outright lie on your part. It was proven time and time again that funding and facilities was other than equal for southern blacks. Southrons are notorious lawbreakers.

    “I was there during the so-called “civil-rights” demonstrations of the 1960s and observed much criminal behavior that never got reported.”

    No. The daily marches in the South were covered extensively, and showed both the violent acts of police and demonstrators. What you are doing here is covering up for your southron friends.

    “These demonstrations were not peaceful by any means, the demonstrators being “egged on” by their new york-based jewish “carpetbagger” handlers.”

    That would be Fake News.

    “The locals, both black and white, wanted NOTHING to do with these “outsiders” coming into their peaceful communities, only to cause trouble.”

    Actually, there were a number of white southerners who wanted Jim Crow to be abolished, so they welcomed the influx of demonstrators from all parts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Kingfelix
    Nice theory, somewhat undermined by how butt-ugly just about all Americans are.

    I was hoping that nobody would notice that weakness. You have put a big dent in my theory’s validity right there. I hope you are satisfied.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    And you’re extremely modest as well.

    At least one person here sees the truth.

    AJM

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @MEFOBILLS
    The races have to be divided, and only then inter-group physiognomy applied.

    A big-assed black women is normal physiognomy for some tribes, as they stored fat in their buttocks and thighs. This created a lower center of gravity, with the penalty of not being able to swing legs as easily when walking. Black men of those tribes associate big asses with genetic fitness.

    North Eastern Black Tribes are evolved for longer distance running, and some -like the Somalians have weird bulb shaped heads.

    So, physiognomy has to be MORE granular, and divided down into race, and even further into tribe.

    White people can easily tell if another white is "off." A good example is Alfred E. Neuman on Mad Magazine. Or, the Dennis the Menace look. Some dissing of "gingers" is legitimate as there is distinct behavioral differences associated with red hair.

    Within the Han Chinese race, there are some high IQ men who look like Frogs. They are extremely ugly, yet also possess great intelligence. The normal evolutionary pattern was bypassed with Mandarin system of civil exams. Those who passed the exams, made enough money to pass on their genes. This process bypassed "good looks" as a proxy for genetic fitness and intelligence.

    I’m aware of the point the book is making. I was simply playing along with some of the unjustified comments made about white people.

    “Within the Han Chinese race, there are some high IQ men who look like Frogs. They are extremely ugly, yet also possess great intelligence. The normal evolutionary pattern was bypassed with Mandarin system of civil exams. Those who passed the exams, made enough money to pass on their genes. This process bypassed “good looks” as a proxy for genetic fitness and intelligence.”

    I’m guessing you’re trying to say Asian people are ugly? I suppose I should be offended, but I’m not Chinese.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @KA
    "Dutton, ever the evolutionist, opines that this is because we have been selected to be religious over thousands of years of evolution. Hence, those who are atheists reflect mutant genes in the brain and people with mental mutations are more likely to have physical ones. This explains their asymmetrical features and asymmetrical brains, leading to left-handedness."

    How have we been selected to be religious by evolution ? Christians , Hindus,Muslims killing each other ?
    What are those genes that serve God's understanding or understanding of God?

    There are many thing wrongs with the excerpts and reviews and conclusion from the fraudulent materials presented by the book.

    As I have already said, the sample sizes suggest little confidence should be accorded the reported research results as such, though evolution presumably wired us to prefer some faces and bodies to others, not least for producing viable offspring. However it seems you are missing knowledge of a commonplace of evolutionary psychology, even if, like many such now clichéd observations, they could be called “Just So Stories”. Do you not think there must be built in behavioural tendencies in the tribes, then larger ethnic groups, that have survived to propagate their genes, to share common emotions based on beliefs which have no basis in modern scientific standards of evidence and reasoning about them? If so, given that our brains, including the controls for behaviour as well as IQ type cognition, are a product of natural selection for the relevant alleles and haplotypes – plus a bit of genetic drift and some bottlenecks, do you really have a problem believing that most of us have a fair amount of natural religiosity built into our genomes?

    Looking introspectively I have to wonder why I was blessed or cursed from an early age with being able to face total uncertainty as a non theist until I sort of got something to believe in when Hawking and others explained that everything we know of (and of course a zillion other universes) could start from “nothing”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @EliteCommInc.
    Ohhhh goodness me oh my, as if choosing a tall man is an indication of intelligence or character.

    Sure there are some things one might be able to guess at buy looking at another person -- and then have those guesses supported over time. But there are also a huge number of guesses that are simply wrong, that we discard because they are wrong. But if one only adhere's to the conclusions that they consider correct, you simply miss the larger picture.

    Women choose tall men because it is generally understood that they will be sustainable providers and provide a good gene pool. But whether such men are intelligent of good character is completely a another matter. If it gene pool then most likely good provider is good to have more opportunities to prove to a larger pool of women who will be making themselves available despite tall so and so already being mated. High IQ and wisdom of faithfulness is just not something one can make intelligent guesses about based on appearance. I expect people who walk out of Harvard to be rational people on sight. But before long I may discover they have completely skewed something as simple as proportional analysis. Appearance and intelligence or morality - character appearance is a dicey proposition.


    Now let's take a tiny poke at this ethnicity play. If I make association s based on ethnicity, I am not making guesses based on looks. I am basing a guess or a conclusion based on what belief system one comes from and the relative behaviors - or practices of as to culture. Since all tall men are not any one ethnicity.
    -----------------

    Sure one can judge a book by its cover, sure one can some things about a another by looking. But whether one can know in depth merely by looking is the domain of spiritualists and soothsayers.

    It is entirely possible for 100 million french men to be wrong as wrong as 1 million women have misjudged the character, and intelligence of the tall man they selected as mates.


    I don't get tattoos or why people in this modern age get them. There are very rare tattoo that make any sense to me, I generally view anyone with a tattoo as a potential criminal -- matters not their skin color or dress --- anyone sporting a tattoo sends my security antennae up. I guess by this article my conclusion that a classroom full of tattoo wearing students are gang banger or association with some other criminal association.

    The volume of data that human brain calculates and analyzes to make conclusions about others is just too much to dissect into parcels and relations at our current stage of human testing on this issue.

    http://www.viralthread.com/new-study-suggests-that-tall-men-are-at-bigger-risk-of-aggressive-prostate-cancer/2/

    As for height Tall men are rare -- I guess that makes the rest of us - most rather low on the totem of IQ desirability -- nonsense.

    The most easily available evidence of a man being a good provider, rather than his height, is his having a satisfied mate. It’s easily shown by experience that having a smiling, attractive, satisfied female partner is a sure way to attract sexual interest from females. This is why poor providers don’t, generally, have mistresses, whereas mistress is a well-defined role in many cultures.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twodees Partain
    The author is referring to making assumptions about what a person might do based on appearance. That isn't a moral judgement. This applies pretty well to politicians, most of whom are physically unattractive. There's a well known saying about it: "Politics is showbiz for ugly people".

    Many of the particularly repellent public figures in government are ugly looking. I usually predict how bad a politician or bureaucrat is going to be by whether or not they look like assholes. All of Obama's picks for appointed office looked like assholes, as did all of GW Bush's picks and almost all of Trump's current picks. Quite a few of them are also butt-ugly.

    Almost all of our current senators either look like assholes or are butt-ugly. The same holds true for House members, though only a few of them are well known by appearances on TV news outlets. Try this: the next time you read a quote by a politician that strikes you as offensive, and you don't know what the person looks like, search out a photo of him and see if he looks like an asshole or is just plain butt-ugly.

    Take Mike Pence as an example. The first time I saw a picture of him, I thought, " What a butt-ugly scutter. He looks like an asshole", and he has turned out to be an asshole, and he is butt-ugly to boot. Dick Cheney, John Bolton, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, James Comey, James Clapper, Robert Mueller, all of these people are butt-ugly assholes and they look like butt-ugly assholes.

    That's why I regard physiognomy as a valid art, just as Dr. Dutton does.

    Nice theory, somewhat undermined by how butt-ugly just about all Americans are.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    I was hoping that nobody would notice that weakness. You have put a big dent in my theory's validity right there. I hope you are satisfied.
    , @jim jones
    Whenever I encounter Yanks in London I am always disappointed that they do not look like Brad Pitt
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @dearieme
    You know lots of geniuses? You must have adopted a remarkably catholic definition of a genius.

    Homophily. I imagine all of us have that as a feature of our lives: we mostly hang with people just like ourselves. For example: almost everyone I socialize with has “doctor” in front of their name. How strange, since only about 2% of US adults have a doctorate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Little late for an April Fool’s.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Astuteobservor II
    damn, for a guy who uses lol, your comment is surprisingly, supremely eloquent :)

    That’s scary.

    LOL or laughing for the more sophisticated.

    Very kind of you

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    "a lovely (black) girl"
    No one cares about your cucky virtue-signalling here. And your humble bragging betrays your low sexual market value. Sometimes it's better to not say anything.

    He’s mensa, army vet and a pro jazz player and feels the need to tell us about it. That shows low self esteem more than anything. At least he’s considered not boring by African women.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    ... and in every post. I told him it is very boring and not worth repeating long ago, seriously, from the posts, it seems AJM found a special needs branch of MENSA,

    A mod. told him to cut it out over a year ago, no effect.

    The only similarly repetitive thing among commentors on this site is Wally, with the CODOH link on every post. In response to a comment from me, Wally did briefly control his compulsion. At least Wally's compulsion is not just a chest-thumping boast.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mishra
    Consider that he's already been chased almost to the ends of the earth...

    adjunct professor of anthropology at Oulu University in northern Finland.
     

    Yes. Not only a mere adjunct, but a mere adjunct in a very undesirable place. Political incorrectness does not advance a career in academic anthropology.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • So I’m “self blaming.” What does that even mean?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ju Ahn
    I don't get it. According to the article, white people tend to have narrower skull and fairer complexions. Both characteristics signify gentler temperament. They tend to have more hairs, muscular, longer limbs than Asians. However, Africans have muscular and longer limbs than whites. Can you articulate how white people look more devilish than people of other race from these profiles? I'm obviously not a white person myself, but from the point of relatively impartial bystander, your argument doesn't make sense.

    The races have to be divided, and only then inter-group physiognomy applied.

    A big-assed black women is normal physiognomy for some tribes, as they stored fat in their buttocks and thighs. This created a lower center of gravity, with the penalty of not being able to swing legs as easily when walking. Black men of those tribes associate big asses with genetic fitness.

    North Eastern Black Tribes are evolved for longer distance running, and some -like the Somalians have weird bulb shaped heads.

    So, physiognomy has to be MORE granular, and divided down into race, and even further into tribe.

    White people can easily tell if another white is “off.” A good example is Alfred E. Neuman on Mad Magazine. Or, the Dennis the Menace look. Some dissing of “gingers” is legitimate as there is distinct behavioral differences associated with red hair.

    Within the Han Chinese race, there are some high IQ men who look like Frogs. They are extremely ugly, yet also possess great intelligence. The normal evolutionary pattern was bypassed with Mandarin system of civil exams. Those who passed the exams, made enough money to pass on their genes. This process bypassed “good looks” as a proxy for genetic fitness and intelligence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ju Ahn
    I'm aware of the point the book is making. I was simply playing along with some of the unjustified comments made about white people.

    "Within the Han Chinese race, there are some high IQ men who look like Frogs. They are extremely ugly, yet also possess great intelligence. The normal evolutionary pattern was bypassed with Mandarin system of civil exams. Those who passed the exams, made enough money to pass on their genes. This process bypassed “good looks” as a proxy for genetic fitness and intelligence."

    I'm guessing you're trying to say Asian people are ugly? I suppose I should be offended, but I'm not Chinese.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    "We would have been better off allowing true “freedom of association” to exist rather than imposing government enforced “public accommodation” on businesses and individuals."

    That is patently false. There is no such thing as "true freedom of association". You live in a society where citizens properly demand that government redress their grievances. In the case of the South, the states there observably violated due process for blacks AND whites.

    "In pre-civil-rights (for some) days, blacks were progressing just fine on their own “content of their character” and would have helped end much segregation on their own by their own actions."

    Once again, you are outright lying. Plessy called for separate but equal. But the Southrons could not even follow this simple directive, as they made things decidedly separate and unequal. Fortunately, they got their comeuppance by a combination of northerners and southerners.

    You are wrong Corvinus. Your communist nature is showing. The right to choose who one associates with is a basic HUMAN right that was abolished with the passage of the so-called “civil-rights” acts, BUT ONLY FOR WHITES. You see, according to the so-called “U S Department of Justice” (actually “just us”, only whites can be “racist” as “people of color do not have political or social power–(their words exactly).
    As to segregation, whites and blacks lost a lot when desegregation was forced on us at the point of bayonets. Blacks WERE coming along just fine, BEFORE the imposition of “civil-rights” laws.
    I was there during the so-called “civil-rights” demonstrations of the 1960s and observed much criminal behavior that never got reported. You see, then as is now, the news media, communists and their fellow travelers had an agenda of their own and as such, could not “let a crisis go to waste”. The rapes, robberies, and the general trashing of the areas they occupied were never reported. Only the reactions of the local citizenry and law enforcement to the lawless behavior of the “demonstrators” was reported…
    These demonstrations were not peaceful by any means, the demonstrators being “egged on” by their new york-based jewish “carpetbagger” handlers. The locals, both black and white, wanted NOTHING to do with these “outsiders” coming into their peaceful communities, only to cause trouble.
    I WAS THERE, and personally witnesses the criminal activity by these so-called “civil-rights (for some)” pioneers…
    We are living with the results to this very day…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "You are wrong Corvinus. Your communist nature is showing."

    It is not communist for citizens to request that their government guarantee their basic freedoms.

    "The right to choose who one associates with is a basic HUMAN right that was abolished with the passage of the so-called “civil-rights” acts, BUT ONLY FOR WHITES."

    You have every liberty to choose who you associate with. The problem is that the southron community had dictated to individual white southerners that it was illegal to marry or sell their homes to black southerners.

    "Blacks WERE coming along just fine, BEFORE the imposition of “civil-rights” laws."

    Another outright lie on your part. It was proven time and time again that funding and facilities was other than equal for southern blacks. Southrons are notorious lawbreakers.

    "I was there during the so-called “civil-rights” demonstrations of the 1960s and observed much criminal behavior that never got reported."

    No. The daily marches in the South were covered extensively, and showed both the violent acts of police and demonstrators. What you are doing here is covering up for your southron friends.

    "These demonstrations were not peaceful by any means, the demonstrators being “egged on” by their new york-based jewish “carpetbagger” handlers."

    That would be Fake News.

    "The locals, both black and white, wanted NOTHING to do with these “outsiders” coming into their peaceful communities, only to cause trouble."

    Actually, there were a number of white southerners who wanted Jim Crow to be abolished, so they welcomed the influx of demonstrators from all parts.
    , @dearieme
    There are no "human rights". Man is a social animal: his rights stem from the society of which he is part. The expression "civil rights" is not a bad stab at acknowledging this fact.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jake
    Can we know by looks which white Gentiles are most likely to be the most culturally suicidal liberals?

    Jake, just go with my scientific method: if they look like assholes, they’re probably liberal WASP or Jew. It is an unfailing scientific method for which I regrettably have no proof.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @EliteCommInc.
    LOL. I understand. But our observations are not in and of themselves accurate. Some very moral and intelligent, well groomed particularly hygienic people have tattoos.


    I love picking on Miss Coulter: tall, deeply analytical sarcastic, funny and yet she has a tattoo. According to a comment I read she showers twice a day. And despite her issues with multiple voting -- i don't generally associate her with the criminal elements or intent.


    Why she hasn't found a husband or willing to sacrifice what it takes to actually be married may b e criminal -- but it's not against the law.

    I just think this theory is generally applicable with a ton of caveats -- like judge a book by its cover. I was right next to Miss Coulter once and I opted not to ask her to lunch - it was lunchtime. My assumption is that she would have lunch with someone like me - based solely on her appearance. Maybe I was right, but then never having opened the cover to test it -- I will never know.

    Suppose I triple check all of the pares of those students with tattoos because tattoos make them suspect and found that three of the twenty were in fact cutting corners. It would be highly suspect if I counted those three as representative of the whole. Three out of twenty confirming said conclusion minus evidence about the other 17, is questionable analytics.

    I am single because I am poor, not just because I am short and unattractive. I am single because in discussion, I am wholly void of the nuances of empathy and sympathy pressing to analytical aspects of conversation - on appearance, one would never know that. As human beings it takes a long time for most of us to come to accommodation about who we are and even then, we surprise ourselves. Banking a set of solid unmalleable conclusions on people based on how they look seems a dicey move.

    I do enjoy the disappointment when women discover that celibacy is not just a line --

    LOL.

    damn, for a guy who uses lol, your comment is surprisingly, supremely eloquent :)

    Read More
    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    That's scary.

    LOL or laughing for the more sophisticated.

    Very kind of you
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ricpic
    What about cock size?

    Some older comments on the topic that might interest you:

    The biggest penises are found in populations between the Tropic of Cancer and Tropic of Capricorn. According to Allen’s Rule, which specifies that protruding body parts tend to be larger in populations inhabiting warmer climes (they serve as useful heat radiators, like the huge ears of desert rabbits)
    [...]
    I could be wrong, but this makes more sense to me than just the testosterone theory, even if androgen receptor sensitivity (lowest in Asians, highest in Africans), etc. is taken into account.

    This would also explain why northern Europeans despite their larger body size and taller stature (Bergmann’s Rule) don’t have the longest penises, because size/length is decreased due to Allen’s Rule?

    Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15 521 men

    Consistent and strongest significant correlation was between flaccid stretched or erect length and height, which ranged from r = 0.2 to 0.6.

    http://www.unz.com/jthompson/the-secret-in-your-eyes/#comment-1816830

    Africans were taller when the colonial era ended in the 1960s. They may have lost height because of collapsing health care systems, rising population density and less dietary diversity among urbanites, the authors said.
    [...]
    Since penile size and height are somewhat correlated (see above comment), this increase in height for South Koreans and other East Asians due to better nutrition, etc. should also then logically translate into a larger average penis size, and potentially a shorter average penis size in sub-Saharan Africans compared to the colonial era.

    http://www.unz.com/jthompson/the-secret-in-your-eyes/#comment-1816986

    Source: https://www.slideshare.net/PaulVMcDowell/modern-homo-sapiens-contemporary-problems

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Corvinus
    Dutton acknowledges in his book that the studies referenced deal with human perception — whether we react differently because of what we see, even if that perception is inaccurate. And he also notes the relationships for example between facial shapes and criminal behavior are probabilities, not certainties. So Dutton took into account such limitations while cautioning that correlation does not equal correlation. In order words, there is a subjectivity of evaluating a physionomic style.

    So while on the surface that it is true that we can judge people by what they look like, how accurate are those judgements, and the manner by which we came up with those judgements, remains decidedly up for debate. Thus, one must be wary of "hard science" based on hereditarian hypotheses that are conjectures about traits which have multiple causes.

    Yes, but I think many intelligent people can discern that these findings of social science are just averages. The problem with the climate in the US is that they do not treat people as intelligent beings who can judge the merits of these findings as their own but block the discussions of these topics altogether. Labeling whoever bold or foolish enough to raise voice in these matters as racists and ostracize them from academic communities or workplaces.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anarchyst
    We would have been better off allowing true "freedom of association" to exist rather than imposing government enforced "public accommodation" on businesses and individuals. Yes, there was segregation, but, so what? There still is segregation today...

    In pre-civil-rights (for some) days, blacks were progressing just fine on their own "content of their character" and would have helped end much segregation on their own by their own actions.

    The "in your face" enforcement of unconstitutional "civil-rights (for some)" laws and statutes has done more to set back the cause of true "civil-rights" (which includes "freedom of association") for all.

    Look at the mess we have now, every perverted group is now demanding their "civil-rights" starting with homosexuals, cross-dressers, and (soon to be legalized) pedophilia and polygamy...

    We should have left well-enough alone...

    We are paying for these misguided "civil-rights (for some)" laws now...

    “We would have been better off allowing true “freedom of association” to exist rather than imposing government enforced “public accommodation” on businesses and individuals.”

    That is patently false. There is no such thing as “true freedom of association”. You live in a society where citizens properly demand that government redress their grievances. In the case of the South, the states there observably violated due process for blacks AND whites.

    “In pre-civil-rights (for some) days, blacks were progressing just fine on their own “content of their character” and would have helped end much segregation on their own by their own actions.”

    Once again, you are outright lying. Plessy called for separate but equal. But the Southrons could not even follow this simple directive, as they made things decidedly separate and unequal. Fortunately, they got their comeuppance by a combination of northerners and southerners.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    You are wrong Corvinus. Your communist nature is showing. The right to choose who one associates with is a basic HUMAN right that was abolished with the passage of the so-called "civil-rights" acts, BUT ONLY FOR WHITES. You see, according to the so-called "U S Department of Justice" (actually "just us", only whites can be "racist" as "people of color do not have political or social power--(their words exactly).
    As to segregation, whites and blacks lost a lot when desegregation was forced on us at the point of bayonets. Blacks WERE coming along just fine, BEFORE the imposition of "civil-rights" laws.
    I was there during the so-called "civil-rights" demonstrations of the 1960s and observed much criminal behavior that never got reported. You see, then as is now, the news media, communists and their fellow travelers had an agenda of their own and as such, could not "let a crisis go to waste". The rapes, robberies, and the general trashing of the areas they occupied were never reported. Only the reactions of the local citizenry and law enforcement to the lawless behavior of the "demonstrators" was reported...
    These demonstrations were not peaceful by any means, the demonstrators being "egged on" by their new york-based jewish "carpetbagger" handlers. The locals, both black and white, wanted NOTHING to do with these "outsiders" coming into their peaceful communities, only to cause trouble.
    I WAS THERE, and personally witnesses the criminal activity by these so-called "civil-rights (for some)" pioneers...
    We are living with the results to this very day...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Long arms … yes, they are nice to have if you need to swing from tree to tree. Our simian cousins all have extremely long arms – the apes, monkeys, orangutans, other guys with tails.

    My worst suspicions now stand validated by science: The apes and monkey, thanks to their long arms, are more intelligent than homo sapiens. And, BTW, they also have broader faces than ours.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    You are looking at photographs. Expect for Holder and Bolton I wrote about people I saw in person fairly often.

    Lived right down the street from Feinstein when she was still married to dr Feinstein and young and beautiful.

    I saw Mayor Moscone several mornings a week because we parked in the same parking lot. Knew Newsone when he was in high school.

    Photos are one thing. The actual people are another. You’ve never seen any of those people in person so don’t judge them by their photos.

    Lived right down the street from Feinstein when she was still married to dr Feinstein and young and beautiful.

    Mr. Feinstein was never beautiful, not even by transexual standards.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Dutton acknowledges in his book that the studies referenced deal with human perception — whether we react differently because of what we see, even if that perception is inaccurate. And he also notes the relationships for example between facial shapes and criminal behavior are probabilities, not certainties. So Dutton took into account such limitations while cautioning that correlation does not equal correlation. In order words, there is a subjectivity of evaluating a physionomic style.

    So while on the surface that it is true that we can judge people by what they look like, how accurate are those judgements, and the manner by which we came up with those judgements, remains decidedly up for debate. Thus, one must be wary of “hard science” based on hereditarian hypotheses that are conjectures about traits which have multiple causes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ju Ahn
    Yes, but I think many intelligent people can discern that these findings of social science are just averages. The problem with the climate in the US is that they do not treat people as intelligent beings who can judge the merits of these findings as their own but block the discussions of these topics altogether. Labeling whoever bold or foolish enough to raise voice in these matters as racists and ostracize them from academic communities or workplaces.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ricpic
    What about cock size?

    Probably positively correlated with aggression since larger size would signify higher testosterone levels.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @hyperbola
    The zionist racist-supremacists and their attempts to justify crimes by "supermen" and the role of the "chosen people" get more and more boring. Look at the claims of the "source",

    Dutton says in his book, the relevant research has been published in top psychology journals, such as Intelligence, Personality and Individual Differences and Evolutionary Psychological Science
     
    and then keep in mind who are the publishers of this four year old "scientific journal". Sad to see that Nature is now a propaganda organ for the "chosen people".

    The Israel Lobby in Germany scribd
    https://es.scribd.com/document/236970539/The-Israel-Lobby-in-Germany

    The ProSieben / Sat1 Group, which combines the German TV station ProSieben, Sat.1, Kabel eins, N24, 9Live and which are especially designed for women transmitter Sixx under one roof, is in possession of the Jew Haim Saban. The Axel Springer Foundation, which was part of the Axel Springer AG conducted from 1981 to 2010 by the Jew Ernst Cramer. After Cramer's death Friede Springer himself took over as CEO. Friede Springer is a Zionist and got 2000 even the Leo Baeck Prize, the highest award of the Central Council of Jews in Germany. CEO of Axel Springer AG is the Zionist Dopfner Matthias, who has held a position at the Aspen Institute Berlin at the same time. The Aspen Institute is an American lobby, which was founded after WW2 propaganda purposes. The Institute is managed by Trustees, the President and CEO is the Jew Walter Isaacson.

    Well, that’s pretty convoluted, even for a paranoid schizophrenic. I commend you sir.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Χωρίς Ὄνομα
    Red Pill Angel: If you are concerned about Dutton's book and its thesis on the grounds of encouraging tribalism, perhaps you should read the Talmud which will help you better understand the Torah: Both texts being the two most important "books" ever written by humans, well ...the "chosen", on "tribalism".

    So Dutton is correct that appearances signal character, and yes, we probably evolved to read faces to a degree, but the farther away the other person is genetically, the harder to read. This difficulty is probably behind our distrust of strangers, and might be responsible for European women’s current troubles with foreigners. A tall, dark Somali guy is not the same as a tall, dark Italian, who is not the same as a Dane of average height for his nationality with brown eyes and hair.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Χωρίς Ὄνομα
    Red Pill Angel: If you are concerned about Dutton's book and its thesis on the grounds of encouraging tribalism, perhaps you should read the Talmud which will help you better understand the Torah: Both texts being the two most important "books" ever written by humans, well ...the "chosen", on "tribalism".

    No, I’m not “concerned” about tribalism; tribalism is a normal human condition, and I meant my comment to convey that. Perhaps I failed so here goes again. We can only infer character with accuracy among people who resemble ourselves a good bit, unless we have a very wide experience with a lot of different types of people. One cannot reliably compare Scandinavians and Italians, much less Han Chinese and Watusi tribesmen. So really the book is a validation of our innate trabalism. It does sound like a good read.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • What about cock size?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ju Ahn
    Probably positively correlated with aggression since larger size would signify higher testosterone levels.
    , @FKA Max
    Some older comments on the topic that might interest you:


    The biggest penises are found in populations between the Tropic of Cancer and Tropic of Capricorn. According to Allen’s Rule, which specifies that protruding body parts tend to be larger in populations inhabiting warmer climes (they serve as useful heat radiators, like the huge ears of desert rabbits)
    [...]
    I could be wrong, but this makes more sense to me than just the testosterone theory, even if androgen receptor sensitivity (lowest in Asians, highest in Africans), etc. is taken into account.

    This would also explain why northern Europeans despite their larger body size and taller stature (Bergmann’s Rule) don’t have the longest penises, because size/length is decreased due to Allen’s Rule?

    Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15 521 men


    Consistent and strongest significant correlation was between flaccid stretched or erect length and height, which ranged from r = 0.2 to 0.6.

     
    - http://www.unz.com/jthompson/the-secret-in-your-eyes/#comment-1816830

    Africans were taller when the colonial era ended in the 1960s. They may have lost height because of collapsing health care systems, rising population density and less dietary diversity among urbanites, the authors said.
    [...]
    Since penile size and height are somewhat correlated (see above comment), this increase in height for South Koreans and other East Asians due to better nutrition, etc. should also then logically translate into a larger average penis size, and potentially a shorter average penis size in sub-Saharan Africans compared to the colonial era.
     
    - http://www.unz.com/jthompson/the-secret-in-your-eyes/#comment-1816986

    https://image.slidesharecdn.com/cdocumentsandsettingspaulmydocumentslosangelesvalleycollegelecturesmodernhomosapiens-contemporarypopulations-090322183204-phpapp01/95/modern-homo-sapiens-contemporary-problems-17-728.jpg

    Source: https://www.slideshare.net/PaulVMcDowell/modern-homo-sapiens-contemporary-problems
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Another interesting point from the book is that observers could gauge male intelligence from inspecting face of the individual but not for females. Has this finding accounted for the makeups women put on the face? One can also suspect female intelligence wasn’t important factor for mate selection through stages of evolution, so we simply evolved in a way that we cannot tell women’s intelligence from their appearance.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    Based on this brilliant -cough- scientific -cough- study, we can infer that the Devil looks like a White degenerate, or vice versa.

    With that in mind...

    Now the sustained evil (over centuries and millennia) of the white degenerate is beginning to make sense.

    Now the whole "in-his-image" thing is beginning to make sense. You guys just got the based-on-who figure wrong.

    I don’t get it. According to the article, white people tend to have narrower skull and fairer complexions. Both characteristics signify gentler temperament. They tend to have more hairs, muscular, longer limbs than Asians. However, Africans have muscular and longer limbs than whites. Can you articulate how white people look more devilish than people of other race from these profiles? I’m obviously not a white person myself, but from the point of relatively impartial bystander, your argument doesn’t make sense.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MEFOBILLS
    The races have to be divided, and only then inter-group physiognomy applied.

    A big-assed black women is normal physiognomy for some tribes, as they stored fat in their buttocks and thighs. This created a lower center of gravity, with the penalty of not being able to swing legs as easily when walking. Black men of those tribes associate big asses with genetic fitness.

    North Eastern Black Tribes are evolved for longer distance running, and some -like the Somalians have weird bulb shaped heads.

    So, physiognomy has to be MORE granular, and divided down into race, and even further into tribe.

    White people can easily tell if another white is "off." A good example is Alfred E. Neuman on Mad Magazine. Or, the Dennis the Menace look. Some dissing of "gingers" is legitimate as there is distinct behavioral differences associated with red hair.

    Within the Han Chinese race, there are some high IQ men who look like Frogs. They are extremely ugly, yet also possess great intelligence. The normal evolutionary pattern was bypassed with Mandarin system of civil exams. Those who passed the exams, made enough money to pass on their genes. This process bypassed "good looks" as a proxy for genetic fitness and intelligence.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    Based on this brilliant -cough- scientific -cough- study, we can infer that the Devil looks like a White degenerate, or vice versa.

    With that in mind...

    Now the sustained evil (over centuries and millennia) of the white degenerate is beginning to make sense.

    Now the whole "in-his-image" thing is beginning to make sense. You guys just got the based-on-who figure wrong.

    As if there is no evil in backwards Africa, Afro-centric Wakanda nor Wauconda, Illinois ( Which was culturally appropriated for its name for that absurd fictional Afro-tech country that will never exist nor ever could exist even in the modern-day definition of a Second World country ). You can stop culturally appropriating the white-designed internet, the white-designed computer and the white-designed English language for your own benefit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • This is an interesting article that you’d most likely never come across in mainstream media. Human beings obviously have natural defensive mechanisms against this ingrained in our genes through ages of evolution. I’ve read an article about a study in the past when dealing with broader-faced person, people adjust their behavior to become more selfish themselves to account for the selfish tendencies exhibited by broader faced individuals.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Old Palo Altan
    Totally true.

    The French have kissable lips not because they kiss a lot, but because of the way they speak.

    Ever wondered why so many Americans have such formless, boring faces after they reach a certain age?

    It's caused by how all too many of us speak.

    And why the Germans of old so often looked like angry hawks. Now they are mostly fat merkleized chickens. Doomed by their disgracefully sloppy articulation.

    Saphir-Whorf on steroids.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Red Pill Angel
    Dutton's book is probably interesting, and I may have to read it to find out what I missed from this review. But Dutton's thesis points out yet another reason for tribalism -- Yes, among people with your own racial background, assuming one is not of mixed heritage, taller may mean smarter. But how can you tell anything about a person from the other side of the world? That Chinese guy may be shorter than you, and have a small nose in comparison, and be smarter too. Or maybe I'm just smarting about the small nose thing.

    Red Pill Angel: If you are concerned about Dutton’s book and its thesis on the grounds of encouraging tribalism, perhaps you should read the Talmud which will help you better understand the Torah: Both texts being the two most important “books” ever written by humans, well …the “chosen”, on “tribalism”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Red Pill Angel
    No, I'm not "concerned" about tribalism; tribalism is a normal human condition, and I meant my comment to convey that. Perhaps I failed so here goes again. We can only infer character with accuracy among people who resemble ourselves a good bit, unless we have a very wide experience with a lot of different types of people. One cannot reliably compare Scandinavians and Italians, much less Han Chinese and Watusi tribesmen. So really the book is a validation of our innate trabalism. It does sound like a good read.
    , @Red Pill Angel
    So Dutton is correct that appearances signal character, and yes, we probably evolved to read faces to a degree, but the farther away the other person is genetically, the harder to read. This difficulty is probably behind our distrust of strangers, and might be responsible for European women's current troubles with foreigners. A tall, dark Somali guy is not the same as a tall, dark Italian, who is not the same as a Dane of average height for his nationality with brown eyes and hair.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @JamesG
    Underestimated by everyone (except me) is the influence language on your face.

    People who speak English exercise a difference set of facial muscles than those who speak other languages.

    Doubt that?

    Just recall the words of Professor Higgins.

    http://www.metrolyrics.com/why-cant-the-english-lyrics-my-fair-lady.html

    Totally true.

    The French have kissable lips not because they kiss a lot, but because of the way they speak.

    Ever wondered why so many Americans have such formless, boring faces after they reach a certain age?

    It’s caused by how all too many of us speak.

    And why the Germans of old so often looked like angry hawks. Now they are mostly fat merkleized chickens. Doomed by their disgracefully sloppy articulation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Saphir-Whorf on steroids.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @hyperbola
    The zionist racist-supremacists and their attempts to justify crimes by "supermen" and the role of the "chosen people" get more and more boring. Look at the claims of the "source",

    Dutton says in his book, the relevant research has been published in top psychology journals, such as Intelligence, Personality and Individual Differences and Evolutionary Psychological Science
     
    and then keep in mind who are the publishers of this four year old "scientific journal". Sad to see that Nature is now a propaganda organ for the "chosen people".

    The Israel Lobby in Germany scribd
    https://es.scribd.com/document/236970539/The-Israel-Lobby-in-Germany

    The ProSieben / Sat1 Group, which combines the German TV station ProSieben, Sat.1, Kabel eins, N24, 9Live and which are especially designed for women transmitter Sixx under one roof, is in possession of the Jew Haim Saban. The Axel Springer Foundation, which was part of the Axel Springer AG conducted from 1981 to 2010 by the Jew Ernst Cramer. After Cramer's death Friede Springer himself took over as CEO. Friede Springer is a Zionist and got 2000 even the Leo Baeck Prize, the highest award of the Central Council of Jews in Germany. CEO of Axel Springer AG is the Zionist Dopfner Matthias, who has held a position at the Aspen Institute Berlin at the same time. The Aspen Institute is an American lobby, which was founded after WW2 propaganda purposes. The Institute is managed by Trustees, the President and CEO is the Jew Walter Isaacson.

    So Haim Saban is all over the world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @renfro
    You have weird taste in looks.

    https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/john-tunney?sort=mostpopular&mediatype=photography&phrase=john%20tunney#license
    https://www.google.com/search?

    q=images+of+Mayor+Moscone&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwif68K758HaAhVEL6wKHe8bAS4Q7AkIQg&biw=781&bih=459#imgrc=wSqQ1d8XmlAVuM:&spf=1523985768870

    You are looking at photographs. Expect for Holder and Bolton I wrote about people I saw in person fairly often.

    Lived right down the street from Feinstein when she was still married to dr Feinstein and young and beautiful.

    I saw Mayor Moscone several mornings a week because we parked in the same parking lot. Knew Newsone when he was in high school.

    Photos are one thing. The actual people are another. You’ve never seen any of those people in person so don’t judge them by their photos.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    Lived right down the street from Feinstein when she was still married to dr Feinstein and young and beautiful.
     
    Mr. Feinstein was never beautiful, not even by transexual standards.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Underestimated by everyone (except me) is the influence language on your face.

    People who speak English exercise a difference set of facial muscles than those who speak other languages.

    Doubt that?

    Just recall the words of Professor Higgins.

    http://www.metrolyrics.com/why-cant-the-english-lyrics-my-fair-lady.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Old Palo Altan
    Totally true.

    The French have kissable lips not because they kiss a lot, but because of the way they speak.

    Ever wondered why so many Americans have such formless, boring faces after they reach a certain age?

    It's caused by how all too many of us speak.

    And why the Germans of old so often looked like angry hawks. Now they are mostly fat merkleized chickens. Doomed by their disgracefully sloppy articulation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The zionist racist-supremacists and their attempts to justify crimes by “supermen” and the role of the “chosen people” get more and more boring. Look at the claims of the “source”,

    Dutton says in his book, the relevant research has been published in top psychology journals, such as Intelligence, Personality and Individual Differences and Evolutionary Psychological Science

    and then keep in mind who are the publishers of this four year old “scientific journal”. Sad to see that Nature is now a propaganda organ for the “chosen people”.

    The Israel Lobby in Germany scribd

    https://es.scribd.com/document/236970539/The-Israel-Lobby-in-Germany

    The ProSieben / Sat1 Group, which combines the German TV station ProSieben, Sat.1, Kabel eins, N24, 9Live and which are especially designed for women transmitter Sixx under one roof, is in possession of the Jew Haim Saban. The Axel Springer Foundation, which was part of the Axel Springer AG conducted from 1981 to 2010 by the Jew Ernst Cramer. After Cramer’s death Friede Springer himself took over as CEO. Friede Springer is a Zionist and got 2000 even the Leo Baeck Prize, the highest award of the Central Council of Jews in Germany. CEO of Axel Springer AG is the Zionist Dopfner Matthias, who has held a position at the Aspen Institute Berlin at the same time. The Aspen Institute is an American lobby, which was founded after WW2 propaganda purposes. The Institute is managed by Trustees, the President and CEO is the Jew Walter Isaacson.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    So Haim Saban is all over the world.
    , @Willy Ruffian
    Well, that's pretty convoluted, even for a paranoid schizophrenic. I commend you sir.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @AndrewR
    I don't necessarily associate tats with criminality, but I do associate them with poor judgment and poor taste.

    LOL. I understand. But our observations are not in and of themselves accurate. Some very moral and intelligent, well groomed particularly hygienic people have tattoos.

    I love picking on Miss Coulter: tall, deeply analytical sarcastic, funny and yet she has a tattoo. According to a comment I read she showers twice a day. And despite her issues with multiple voting — i don’t generally associate her with the criminal elements or intent.

    Why she hasn’t found a husband or willing to sacrifice what it takes to actually be married may b e criminal — but it’s not against the law.

    I just think this theory is generally applicable with a ton of caveats — like judge a book by its cover. I was right next to Miss Coulter once and I opted not to ask her to lunch – it was lunchtime. My assumption is that she would have lunch with someone like me – based solely on her appearance. Maybe I was right, but then never having opened the cover to test it — I will never know.

    Suppose I triple check all of the pares of those students with tattoos because tattoos make them suspect and found that three of the twenty were in fact cutting corners. It would be highly suspect if I counted those three as representative of the whole. Three out of twenty confirming said conclusion minus evidence about the other 17, is questionable analytics.

    I am single because I am poor, not just because I am short and unattractive. I am single because in discussion, I am wholly void of the nuances of empathy and sympathy pressing to analytical aspects of conversation – on appearance, one would never know that. As human beings it takes a long time for most of us to come to accommodation about who we are and even then, we surprise ourselves. Banking a set of solid unmalleable conclusions on people based on how they look seems a dicey move.

    I do enjoy the disappointment when women discover that celibacy is not just a line —

    LOL.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    damn, for a guy who uses lol, your comment is surprisingly, supremely eloquent :)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @EliteCommInc.
    Ohhhh goodness me oh my, as if choosing a tall man is an indication of intelligence or character.

    Sure there are some things one might be able to guess at buy looking at another person -- and then have those guesses supported over time. But there are also a huge number of guesses that are simply wrong, that we discard because they are wrong. But if one only adhere's to the conclusions that they consider correct, you simply miss the larger picture.

    Women choose tall men because it is generally understood that they will be sustainable providers and provide a good gene pool. But whether such men are intelligent of good character is completely a another matter. If it gene pool then most likely good provider is good to have more opportunities to prove to a larger pool of women who will be making themselves available despite tall so and so already being mated. High IQ and wisdom of faithfulness is just not something one can make intelligent guesses about based on appearance. I expect people who walk out of Harvard to be rational people on sight. But before long I may discover they have completely skewed something as simple as proportional analysis. Appearance and intelligence or morality - character appearance is a dicey proposition.


    Now let's take a tiny poke at this ethnicity play. If I make association s based on ethnicity, I am not making guesses based on looks. I am basing a guess or a conclusion based on what belief system one comes from and the relative behaviors - or practices of as to culture. Since all tall men are not any one ethnicity.
    -----------------

    Sure one can judge a book by its cover, sure one can some things about a another by looking. But whether one can know in depth merely by looking is the domain of spiritualists and soothsayers.

    It is entirely possible for 100 million french men to be wrong as wrong as 1 million women have misjudged the character, and intelligence of the tall man they selected as mates.


    I don't get tattoos or why people in this modern age get them. There are very rare tattoo that make any sense to me, I generally view anyone with a tattoo as a potential criminal -- matters not their skin color or dress --- anyone sporting a tattoo sends my security antennae up. I guess by this article my conclusion that a classroom full of tattoo wearing students are gang banger or association with some other criminal association.

    The volume of data that human brain calculates and analyzes to make conclusions about others is just too much to dissect into parcels and relations at our current stage of human testing on this issue.

    http://www.viralthread.com/new-study-suggests-that-tall-men-are-at-bigger-risk-of-aggressive-prostate-cancer/2/

    As for height Tall men are rare -- I guess that makes the rest of us - most rather low on the totem of IQ desirability -- nonsense.

    A) Height is a decent measure of strength and health for sexual signaling in the same way that male crows are larger than their females and especially have longer tail feathers which impede flight. The ability to costly signal indicates that the specimen is of superior quality, and therefore likely to pass on similar genes to his children.

    B) Intelligence is complex but one of the strongest tells of flawed intelligence will be ill health and potentially associated brain damage. Height is also indeed associated with higher intelligence, all other things being equal(though only mildly).

    C) Fidelity is not necessarily that much of a marker of provision. Sarah Blaffer Hardy found that in tribal societies, women in monogamous pairings did not have higher childhood survival rates versus the women in polygamous relationships with a high status male such as the chieftan.

    D) We are talking about heuristics here, therefore generalities apply and it is not necessary to seek for details from a “soothsayers.” Valid objections can be made in regards to the sample size and publication bias, objections about “lots of people could be wrong” are useless and do not advance knowledge.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    You are just afraid now that with improved technologies, plus other cloud assisted gathering for big data, we can now identify primitives such as yourself and implement remediation for your limited brains before you can cause too much trouble. You have to understand though that your illness is treatable and you don't really have worry about being thought ill of it: like most stigmas, knowing how common it is will dispel it and the cost of treatment will drop with scalability.

    BS

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Both John Bolton and Eric Holder are very very good looking. Bolton’s getting old and wrinkly but he was very habndsomr when younger.
    Both have well proportioned features and biggish eyes.

    Senator Feinstein is old now but was a drop dead beauty back in the day. She never photographed well I know. She had white white skin shiny black hair grayish hazel eyes and perfect features.
    In fact she closely resembles the Friends actress Courtney Cox.

    California lieutenant governor Newsome and Los Angeles Mayor Garcetti are very handsome. Ca Senator Tunney was better looking than Brad Pitt. San Francisco Mayor Moscone was very handsome.

    President Kennedy was supposed to be very good looking according to the paid off media but he was mediocre looking.

    You have weird taste in looks.

    https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/john-tunney?sort=mostpopular&mediatype=photography&phrase=john%20tunney#license

    https://www.google.com/search?

    q=images+of+Mayor+Moscone&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwif68K758HaAhVEL6wKHe8bAS4Q7AkIQg&biw=781&bih=459#imgrc=wSqQ1d8XmlAVuM:&spf=1523985768870

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    You are looking at photographs. Expect for Holder and Bolton I wrote about people I saw in person fairly often.

    Lived right down the street from Feinstein when she was still married to dr Feinstein and young and beautiful.

    I saw Mayor Moscone several mornings a week because we parked in the same parking lot. Knew Newsone when he was in high school.

    Photos are one thing. The actual people are another. You’ve never seen any of those people in person so don’t judge them by their photos.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous[342] • Disclaimer says:
    @bjondo
    BS

    You are just afraid now that with improved technologies, plus other cloud assisted gathering for big data, we can now identify primitives such as yourself and implement remediation for your limited brains before you can cause too much trouble. You have to understand though that your illness is treatable and you don’t really have worry about being thought ill of it: like most stigmas, knowing how common it is will dispel it and the cost of treatment will drop with scalability.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bjondo
    BS
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @L Woods

    How come I have a 3 SD iq
     
    Lmao, no you don't.

    President Trump actually does have a hairy chest! And he takes Propecia for baldness. Ok.

    Only joking about my IQ, Mr L Woods. Just one of those dreadful midwit persons struggling to comment on the internet, without enough brains to get by. If only my poor nose —

    Seriously, though, I’m just not buying Dutton’s theory except in the broadest terms.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anon
    "Women with large buttocks were found to be introverted, self-abasing, and high in guilt. "
    The Kardashians, J-Lo, Beyoncé, Demi Lovato?

    I do not get the deal about big butts being popular or the ideal for women….huge turn off to me.

    They look absolutely deformed. ..mystery to me how they are able get around or even get up from a sitting position with those mountains of blubber on their back sides.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • BS

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    You are just afraid now that with improved technologies, plus other cloud assisted gathering for big data, we can now identify primitives such as yourself and implement remediation for your limited brains before you can cause too much trouble. You have to understand though that your illness is treatable and you don't really have worry about being thought ill of it: like most stigmas, knowing how common it is will dispel it and the cost of treatment will drop with scalability.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Tattoos are a generational thing. When you were young older people were appalled when young women got their ears pierced instead of wearing those horrible clip on earrings.

    Tats are certainly more common now than they have ever been, but while that may mean that they’re less correlative with criminality, they correlate more highly with poor judgement. In the past, many people with poor judgement never got tats. Nowadays that is much less true.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @EliteCommInc.
    Ohhhh goodness me oh my, as if choosing a tall man is an indication of intelligence or character.

    Sure there are some things one might be able to guess at buy looking at another person -- and then have those guesses supported over time. But there are also a huge number of guesses that are simply wrong, that we discard because they are wrong. But if one only adhere's to the conclusions that they consider correct, you simply miss the larger picture.

    Women choose tall men because it is generally understood that they will be sustainable providers and provide a good gene pool. But whether such men are intelligent of good character is completely a another matter. If it gene pool then most likely good provider is good to have more opportunities to prove to a larger pool of women who will be making themselves available despite tall so and so already being mated. High IQ and wisdom of faithfulness is just not something one can make intelligent guesses about based on appearance. I expect people who walk out of Harvard to be rational people on sight. But before long I may discover they have completely skewed something as simple as proportional analysis. Appearance and intelligence or morality - character appearance is a dicey proposition.


    Now let's take a tiny poke at this ethnicity play. If I make association s based on ethnicity, I am not making guesses based on looks. I am basing a guess or a conclusion based on what belief system one comes from and the relative behaviors - or practices of as to culture. Since all tall men are not any one ethnicity.
    -----------------

    Sure one can judge a book by its cover, sure one can some things about a another by looking. But whether one can know in depth merely by looking is the domain of spiritualists and soothsayers.

    It is entirely possible for 100 million french men to be wrong as wrong as 1 million women have misjudged the character, and intelligence of the tall man they selected as mates.


    I don't get tattoos or why people in this modern age get them. There are very rare tattoo that make any sense to me, I generally view anyone with a tattoo as a potential criminal -- matters not their skin color or dress --- anyone sporting a tattoo sends my security antennae up. I guess by this article my conclusion that a classroom full of tattoo wearing students are gang banger or association with some other criminal association.

    The volume of data that human brain calculates and analyzes to make conclusions about others is just too much to dissect into parcels and relations at our current stage of human testing on this issue.

    http://www.viralthread.com/new-study-suggests-that-tall-men-are-at-bigger-risk-of-aggressive-prostate-cancer/2/

    As for height Tall men are rare -- I guess that makes the rest of us - most rather low on the totem of IQ desirability -- nonsense.

    I don’t necessarily associate tats with criminality, but I do associate them with poor judgment and poor taste.

    Read More
    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    LOL. I understand. But our observations are not in and of themselves accurate. Some very moral and intelligent, well groomed particularly hygienic people have tattoos.


    I love picking on Miss Coulter: tall, deeply analytical sarcastic, funny and yet she has a tattoo. According to a comment I read she showers twice a day. And despite her issues with multiple voting -- i don't generally associate her with the criminal elements or intent.


    Why she hasn't found a husband or willing to sacrifice what it takes to actually be married may b e criminal -- but it's not against the law.

    I just think this theory is generally applicable with a ton of caveats -- like judge a book by its cover. I was right next to Miss Coulter once and I opted not to ask her to lunch - it was lunchtime. My assumption is that she would have lunch with someone like me - based solely on her appearance. Maybe I was right, but then never having opened the cover to test it -- I will never know.

    Suppose I triple check all of the pares of those students with tattoos because tattoos make them suspect and found that three of the twenty were in fact cutting corners. It would be highly suspect if I counted those three as representative of the whole. Three out of twenty confirming said conclusion minus evidence about the other 17, is questionable analytics.

    I am single because I am poor, not just because I am short and unattractive. I am single because in discussion, I am wholly void of the nuances of empathy and sympathy pressing to analytical aspects of conversation - on appearance, one would never know that. As human beings it takes a long time for most of us to come to accommodation about who we are and even then, we surprise ourselves. Banking a set of solid unmalleable conclusions on people based on how they look seems a dicey move.

    I do enjoy the disappointment when women discover that celibacy is not just a line --

    LOL.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Twodees Partain
    The author is referring to making assumptions about what a person might do based on appearance. That isn't a moral judgement. This applies pretty well to politicians, most of whom are physically unattractive. There's a well known saying about it: "Politics is showbiz for ugly people".

    Many of the particularly repellent public figures in government are ugly looking. I usually predict how bad a politician or bureaucrat is going to be by whether or not they look like assholes. All of Obama's picks for appointed office looked like assholes, as did all of GW Bush's picks and almost all of Trump's current picks. Quite a few of them are also butt-ugly.

    Almost all of our current senators either look like assholes or are butt-ugly. The same holds true for House members, though only a few of them are well known by appearances on TV news outlets. Try this: the next time you read a quote by a politician that strikes you as offensive, and you don't know what the person looks like, search out a photo of him and see if he looks like an asshole or is just plain butt-ugly.

    Take Mike Pence as an example. The first time I saw a picture of him, I thought, " What a butt-ugly scutter. He looks like an asshole", and he has turned out to be an asshole, and he is butt-ugly to boot. Dick Cheney, John Bolton, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, James Comey, James Clapper, Robert Mueller, all of these people are butt-ugly assholes and they look like butt-ugly assholes.

    That's why I regard physiognomy as a valid art, just as Dr. Dutton does.

    Both John Bolton and Eric Holder are very very good looking. Bolton’s getting old and wrinkly but he was very habndsomr when younger.
    Both have well proportioned features and biggish eyes.

    Senator Feinstein is old now but was a drop dead beauty back in the day. She never photographed well I know. She had white white skin shiny black hair grayish hazel eyes and perfect features.
    In fact she closely resembles the Friends actress Courtney Cox.

    California lieutenant governor Newsome and Los Angeles Mayor Garcetti are very handsome. Ca Senator Tunney was better looking than Brad Pitt. San Francisco Mayor Moscone was very handsome.

    President Kennedy was supposed to be very good looking according to the paid off media but he was mediocre looking.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro
    You have weird taste in looks.

    https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/john-tunney?sort=mostpopular&mediatype=photography&phrase=john%20tunney#license
    https://www.google.com/search?

    q=images+of+Mayor+Moscone&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwif68K758HaAhVEL6wKHe8bAS4Q7AkIQg&biw=781&bih=459#imgrc=wSqQ1d8XmlAVuM:&spf=1523985768870
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @EliteCommInc.
    Ohhhh goodness me oh my, as if choosing a tall man is an indication of intelligence or character.

    Sure there are some things one might be able to guess at buy looking at another person -- and then have those guesses supported over time. But there are also a huge number of guesses that are simply wrong, that we discard because they are wrong. But if one only adhere's to the conclusions that they consider correct, you simply miss the larger picture.

    Women choose tall men because it is generally understood that they will be sustainable providers and provide a good gene pool. But whether such men are intelligent of good character is completely a another matter. If it gene pool then most likely good provider is good to have more opportunities to prove to a larger pool of women who will be making themselves available despite tall so and so already being mated. High IQ and wisdom of faithfulness is just not something one can make intelligent guesses about based on appearance. I expect people who walk out of Harvard to be rational people on sight. But before long I may discover they have completely skewed something as simple as proportional analysis. Appearance and intelligence or morality - character appearance is a dicey proposition.


    Now let's take a tiny poke at this ethnicity play. If I make association s based on ethnicity, I am not making guesses based on looks. I am basing a guess or a conclusion based on what belief system one comes from and the relative behaviors - or practices of as to culture. Since all tall men are not any one ethnicity.
    -----------------

    Sure one can judge a book by its cover, sure one can some things about a another by looking. But whether one can know in depth merely by looking is the domain of spiritualists and soothsayers.

    It is entirely possible for 100 million french men to be wrong as wrong as 1 million women have misjudged the character, and intelligence of the tall man they selected as mates.


    I don't get tattoos or why people in this modern age get them. There are very rare tattoo that make any sense to me, I generally view anyone with a tattoo as a potential criminal -- matters not their skin color or dress --- anyone sporting a tattoo sends my security antennae up. I guess by this article my conclusion that a classroom full of tattoo wearing students are gang banger or association with some other criminal association.

    The volume of data that human brain calculates and analyzes to make conclusions about others is just too much to dissect into parcels and relations at our current stage of human testing on this issue.

    http://www.viralthread.com/new-study-suggests-that-tall-men-are-at-bigger-risk-of-aggressive-prostate-cancer/2/

    As for height Tall men are rare -- I guess that makes the rest of us - most rather low on the totem of IQ desirability -- nonsense.

    Tattoos are a generational thing. When you were young older people were appalled when young women got their ears pierced instead of wearing those horrible clip on earrings.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Tats are certainly more common now than they have ever been, but while that may mean that they're less correlative with criminality, they correlate more highly with poor judgement. In the past, many people with poor judgement never got tats. Nowadays that is much less true.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Erik Sieven
    "Hairy, muscular, long-limbed, bald men"
    so basically Non-East Asians.
    By the way I found it interesting that already in the Ramayana Rama is described as having "long arms" which obvious is meant as a positive trait. Up to the time I read the book I never thought about the difference between (relatively) long and short arms.

    Long arms are useful for baseball players, boxers, bull fighters restaurant cooks and police officers.

    Probably pickpockets and shoplifters as well.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Joe Wong
    What the author or the western main stream means is killing one is murder but killing in industrial scale is humanitarian intervention for demicracy and human rights even if it is bombing, killing and waterboarding on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation.

    Yes,yes, we know. Only White Europeans, never the Chinese or any other race has ever had a war.

    Chinese history, 6,000 years of peace and harmony when all disputes were settled by negotiations and never, never any kind of violence.

    BTW, the Taiping rebellion never happened. It’s just a myth created by the evil French and British. And Mao created heaven on earth without a single death.

    The 3 Kingdoms war never happened. The Chinese just made up the stories as a way to entertain themselves on long winter evenings.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Authenticjazzman
    Well the one positive aspect, for men, of being "butt-ugly" as you so poetically phrase, is the strange enigma of ugly men who attract beautiful women, and starting with myself : I have always considered myself to indeed be a "butt-ugly" guy and have however never lacked for relationships with "beautiful" gals, having been persued, seduced and chased by gorgeous ladies for the course of my adult lifetime.
    I can recall a lady-friend (attorney) stunning me with the statement that : "You are an ugly guy,but in a beautiful way".
    Can recall a lovely (black) girl proclaiming : "You are and interesting guy whereas most men are quite boring".

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz artist.

    And you’re extremely modest as well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    At least one person here sees the truth.

    AJM
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Red Pill Angel
    But the President isn't bald. He's certainly tall, but a slim man turned fat rather than muscular. I haven't seen a picture of his bare chest but he doesn't look very hairy to me. And his nose isn't long, in fact, rather short. In fact, as a young man he was baby-faced. And when talking broad or long face, how can it be both? How can the Chinese have the blackest hair AND broad faces but low testosterone? How come I have a 3 SD iq and a little button nose? And all the people I know with higher iq's than me are so short? I don't know a single tall genius, but lotsa short ones, and they aren't very successful, either, as a rule. What about Jewish people? They have long noses, all right, but look how short -- oh, I give up.

    How come I have a 3 SD iq

    Lmao, no you don’t.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Red Pill Angel
    President Trump actually does have a hairy chest! And he takes Propecia for baldness. Ok.

    Only joking about my IQ, Mr L Woods. Just one of those dreadful midwit persons struggling to comment on the internet, without enough brains to get by. If only my poor nose ---

    Seriously, though, I'm just not buying Dutton's theory except in the broadest terms.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Svigor

    which argues that even within races and sexes you can, with a fair degree of accuracy, infer people’s personalities from appearances.
     
    Science catches up with me again.

    What the author or the western main stream means is killing one is murder but killing in industrial scale is humanitarian intervention for demicracy and human rights even if it is bombing, killing and waterboarding on the fabricated phantom WMD allegation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Yes,yes, we know. Only White Europeans, never the Chinese or any other race has ever had a war.

    Chinese history, 6,000 years of peace and harmony when all disputes were settled by negotiations and never, never any kind of violence.

    BTW, the Taiping rebellion never happened. It’s just a myth created by the evil French and British. And Mao created heaven on earth without a single death.

    The 3 Kingdoms war never happened. The Chinese just made up the stories as a way to entertain themselves on long winter evenings.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Can we know by looks which white Gentiles are most likely to be the most culturally suicidal liberals?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Jake, just go with my scientific method: if they look like assholes, they're probably liberal WASP or Jew. It is an unfailing scientific method for which I regrettably have no proof.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • It’s always amusing to me how philosophy and popular culture hasn’t caught up to Darwinism.

    One of the key insights of Darwinism is that our minds have not evolved to know truth but only survive. If we evolved to be religious, this implies there is a higher standpoint from which we can judge whether it’s true. But our minds have not evolved to give us truth, so we could never judge whether religion is true. Any answer obtained through our cognitive processes would necessarily be the product of evolutionary processes not designed to give us truth.

    All our knowledge are ‘useful fictions’, according to Darwinism. If that belief helps you design a functioning airplane, great. If that religious belief helps you cope with psychological realities, great. Epistomelogically there is no difference between the two.

    I find it amusing when ‘scientists’ use Darwin and ‘truth’ in the same sentence.

    As for this book, if we evolved to naturally read people, we certainly don’t need it! As with all such ‘science’, it’s conclusions are probably mostly bullshit or so many counterexample in real life that go against the ‘statistical trends’ as to be useless.

    Rely on intuition.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lincoln Blockface Squarebeard III

    Rely on intuition.
     
    Agree. Reliable intuition is invaluable and many people (particularly men) just don't have it which leaves them at a disadvantage in social situations. The same with empathy, very useful and not only do people suck at it but they often don't even know what it means. Sherlock Holmes, for example, had very strong empathy. But ask the average American to describe it and he'll give you a description of compassion. Not the same thing at all.

    Judging people based on physical traits alone just isn't very reliable and soon the "exceptions" to the "rule" begin to pile up. Which is why I don't get why some folks are so passionate about it. Ditto linking IQ and race Why the excitement over these things?. Does it get them laid or increase their access to valuable resources? As a hobby it's beyond boring and in practical terms it's all but useless. Whatever gets you through the night I suppose.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • so, what was the conclusion in the book? no, I am not about to read this kind of book.

    after reading about faces in a research(around 2003) on averaging faces in a computer program. the more faces the researchers feed into the program, the resulting face becomes more and more attractive.

    beauty is symmetry. nothing more or less.

    how is something like this consider serious research? not in the same category as voodoo? witchcraft?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Hairy, muscular, long-limbed, bald men”
    so basically Non-East Asians.
    By the way I found it interesting that already in the Ramayana Rama is described as having “long arms” which obvious is meant as a positive trait. Up to the time I read the book I never thought about the difference between (relatively) long and short arms.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Long arms are useful for baseball players, boxers, bull fighters restaurant cooks and police officers.

    Probably pickpockets and shoplifters as well.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Authenticjazzman
    Well the one positive aspect, for men, of being "butt-ugly" as you so poetically phrase, is the strange enigma of ugly men who attract beautiful women, and starting with myself : I have always considered myself to indeed be a "butt-ugly" guy and have however never lacked for relationships with "beautiful" gals, having been persued, seduced and chased by gorgeous ladies for the course of my adult lifetime.
    I can recall a lady-friend (attorney) stunning me with the statement that : "You are an ugly guy,but in a beautiful way".
    Can recall a lovely (black) girl proclaiming : "You are and interesting guy whereas most men are quite boring".

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz artist.

    “a lovely (black) girl”
    No one cares about your cucky virtue-signalling here. And your humble bragging betrays your low sexual market value. Sometimes it’s better to not say anything.

    Read More
    • Replies: @WhiteWolf
    He's mensa, army vet and a pro jazz player and feels the need to tell us about it. That shows low self esteem more than anything. At least he's considered not boring by African women.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twodees Partain
    The author is referring to making assumptions about what a person might do based on appearance. That isn't a moral judgement. This applies pretty well to politicians, most of whom are physically unattractive. There's a well known saying about it: "Politics is showbiz for ugly people".

    Many of the particularly repellent public figures in government are ugly looking. I usually predict how bad a politician or bureaucrat is going to be by whether or not they look like assholes. All of Obama's picks for appointed office looked like assholes, as did all of GW Bush's picks and almost all of Trump's current picks. Quite a few of them are also butt-ugly.

    Almost all of our current senators either look like assholes or are butt-ugly. The same holds true for House members, though only a few of them are well known by appearances on TV news outlets. Try this: the next time you read a quote by a politician that strikes you as offensive, and you don't know what the person looks like, search out a photo of him and see if he looks like an asshole or is just plain butt-ugly.

    Take Mike Pence as an example. The first time I saw a picture of him, I thought, " What a butt-ugly scutter. He looks like an asshole", and he has turned out to be an asshole, and he is butt-ugly to boot. Dick Cheney, John Bolton, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, James Comey, James Clapper, Robert Mueller, all of these people are butt-ugly assholes and they look like butt-ugly assholes.

    That's why I regard physiognomy as a valid art, just as Dr. Dutton does.

    People will take your comment seriously. If I could, I would slap your ugly face for sh`tting up the comment section with this.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Yeah, well, I would tell you to kiss my ass but you probably couldn't reach it without a step stool.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • KA says:

    “Dutton, ever the evolutionist, opines that this is because we have been selected to be religious over thousands of years of evolution. Hence, those who are atheists reflect mutant genes in the brain and people with mental mutations are more likely to have physical ones. This explains their asymmetrical features and asymmetrical brains, leading to left-handedness.”

    How have we been selected to be religious by evolution ? Christians , Hindus,Muslims killing each other ?
    What are those genes that serve God’s understanding or understanding of God?

    There are many thing wrongs with the excerpts and reviews and conclusion from the fraudulent materials presented by the book.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    As I have already said, the sample sizes suggest little confidence should be accorded the reported research results as such, though evolution presumably wired us to prefer some faces and bodies to others, not least for producing viable offspring. However it seems you are missing knowledge of a commonplace of evolutionary psychology, even if, like many such now clichéd observations, they could be called "Just So Stories". Do you not think there must be built in behavioural tendencies in the tribes, then larger ethnic groups, that have survived to propagate their genes, to share common emotions based on beliefs which have no basis in modern scientific standards of evidence and reasoning about them? If so, given that our brains, including the controls for behaviour as well as IQ type cognition, are a product of natural selection for the relevant alleles and haplotypes - plus a bit of genetic drift and some bottlenecks, do you really have a problem believing that most of us have a fair amount of natural religiosity built into our genomes?

    Looking introspectively I have to wonder why I was blessed or cursed from an early age with being able to face total uncertainty as a non theist until I sort of got something to believe in when Hawking and others explained that everything we know of (and of course a zillion other universes) could start from "nothing".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.