The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / By Dilip Hiro
 All Comments / By Dilip Hiro
    In his State of the Union address, Donald Trump warned grimly of “rivals like China and Russia that challenge our interests, our economy, and our values.” In response, he demanded that Congress give even more money to “our great military” and fund the growth and modernization of the U.S. nuclear arsenal, making it “so strong...
  • China isn’t much better but both countries being authoritarian means that they have limited understanding of genuine empathy and a rules-based sociey

    ‘rules based societies like fukusI[ndia] ?

    If this guy can pass for a murkkan ‘progressive’ then
    Gawd help us !

    hhhhh

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    still laughing? your little pieces of "soviet" engineering are burning with stinking vodka-infused flesh in them now and with anything who trusts those worthless deathtraps against American firepower. You've had your little heyday before when we backed down but now its time to run back and hide with your head between your little legs and do autofellatio in the quite dark with Sheriff Mattis on the watch.

    http://www.businessinsider.com/a-us-jet-destroyed-a-russian-t-72-battle-tank-in-self-defense-in-syria-2018-2


    Russia strong! Very strong! In hell, now, being strong! Now get the fuck out of Crimea you bandits.

    Russia strong! Very strong! In hell, now, being strong! Now get the fuck out of Crimea you bandits.

    Try not to fart. You can put some pictures of Crimea on your wall and do masturbate – that’s all we can help you with.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova
    Considering this invention of astronomic power of Russian influence possible everything and anything only project of desperate weakness of defensive apparatus of US and western countries.
    It is called double edged sword.
    It makes Russians laugh so much that they are rolling on the floor.
    Concerning you, you are total and absolutely idiotic POS.

    still laughing? your little pieces of “soviet” engineering are burning with stinking vodka-infused flesh in them now and with anything who trusts those worthless deathtraps against American firepower. You’ve had your little heyday before when we backed down but now its time to run back and hide with your head between your little legs and do autofellatio in the quite dark with Sheriff Mattis on the watch.

    http://www.businessinsider.com/a-us-jet-destroyed-a-russian-t-72-battle-tank-in-self-defense-in-syria-2018-2

    Russia strong! Very strong! In hell, now, being strong! Now get the fuck out of Crimea you bandits.

    Read More
    • Replies: @yurivku

    Russia strong! Very strong! In hell, now, being strong! Now get the fuck out of Crimea you bandits.
     
    Try not to fart. You can put some pictures of Crimea on your wall and do masturbate - that's all we can help you with.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    Not only European leaders - I think that a number of American leaders also see that clear and present threat that Russia poses to the world through its promotion of extremism and active intervention in the politics of the United States. This has reached the extent to actual hack of voting machines, a projection of of how the brutally authoritarian government that by now has placed sympathizers such as Trump(who praises Putin at every moment the orange cheeseball can).

    China isn't much better but both countries being authoritarian means that they have limited understanding of genuine empathy and a rules-based sociey and therefore can be played off each other. Tactic American support for the recovering of former Chinese lands now called Siberia, for exmaple, should be traded until Russia removes invasion forces from Ukraine and allows for a free and open election to build toward a liberal democracy. After Russia is brought to heel, then China can also be mitigated and isolated and progressed toward a more friendly government. The people are not a problem in a the whole - Poland, South Korea and Japan are example of success stories of formerly regressive and xenophobic societies who can be brought and educated to universal values, but its important that the UN is active(and it cannot wit hthe stupid fake president) to prevent backsliding toward despotisim.

    There is a sickness to the "russian soul" a callous rudeness and lack of empathy for marginalized individuals, which filters into their government and worship of strongman characters. The upside is that thanks to growing awareness, this means that huge quantities of their society are active and bravely seeking change, such as women currently being forced into reactionary roles and literally being beaten to keep silent.

    https://www.hddocumentary.com/bbc-stacy-dooley-investigates-russias-war-on-women-2018/

    Wow! Now I see where US gets the imbeciles from for her President’s administration and how you fill the Congress hall chairs!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Norumbega
    "China’s expansive almost-trillion-dollar One Belt One Road initiative, an infrastructure and transportation project meant to link the vast Eurasian landmass in a great economic web whose heart would lie in Beijing. (These days, the only trillion-dollar “initiatives” out of Washington involve building up its national security state, the military, and the nuclear arsenal further.) This was the sort of global project that once would have been a natural for the U.S. No longer." (Italics added.)

    When? Perhaps FDR's post-war intention to cooperatively develop the whole world, as described by his son, qualifies here, though the vision was never realized. The Marshall Plan did rebuild Europe, though its actual scale was on the order of 1/10 or less the Belt and Road Initiative in adjusted dollars. Kennedy's Alliance for Progress might also be invoked for comparison, though again dwarfed by BRI, and with little to show for it. But the fact is, even these episodes are exceptional. The italicized words above seem quite delusional when one considers the post Bretton Woods regime debt bondage and IMF conditionalities in the interests of Wall Street/City of London.

    The irony is that cooperation with China, toward which Trump (though opposed by the neocons within the Trump Administration) seems more favorably inclined than his predecessors, could be a key ingredient for financing Trump's own infrastructure promises, not to mention potential participation by US companies in BRI projects abroad. The $253 billion in memorandums of understanding signed during Trump's China visit in November (including $83.7 for West Virginia alone) are a promising beginning in this regard. Such beneficial cooperation in no way contradicts "America First" and actually offers a way forward, and away from the brink of confrontation between nuclear superpowers that the geopolitical view promotes as inevitable.

    “China” could be a key ingredient for financing Trump’s own infrastructure promises,

    A sovereign issuer of currency does not need to borrow foreign capital. If your country produces steel, electricity, all the minerals needed, and has an educated workforce, then all the ingredients are present. A sovereign can then issue money to do the projects.

    While bank corporations do run the U.S. it is only by way of fraud. During wartime, monetary fraud is shoved aside. For example, U.S. spent debt free using line item budget authority during WW2. This line item money funneled through reconstruction finance corporation, to then build out aviation, synthetic rubber, and aluminum smelting. The companies created were sold to American’s for $1.

    It is preposterous to think the U.S. needs Chinese money.

    China has about five large state banks, and these banks emit Yuans in the form of loans. These state entities also forgive said loans, effectively making their Yuan bank credit debt free. China has issued trillions of Yuans this way.

    So, this notion of importing formerly debt free issued Yuans to then produce in America is ignorant in the extreme.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Read a cogent summary and analysis of the Monroe Doctrine, then re-read this article in that context. Here is just one example:

    “… TPP was meant, above all, to limit China’s future economic clout in the region by permanently linking the United States to East Asia. The pact was, in other words, meant to be an economic bulwark against a rising China.”

    A pushy, aggressive old-world power meddling in the back-yard of a rising country.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Golly Gee! Author has penned 36 books and yet learned nothing but “Conventional Wisdom” and old bromides about world politics and TRUMP’s approach to them??

    TEH STOOPID is strong with this one!

    Is 36 books’ worth of drivel a new record ? Or what?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Helping hand? Perhaps in the sense that Trump is America’s Gorbachev. MAGA is just another Perestroika. 25 years after the USSR’s, America’s Either/Or moment had come round at last. Trump’s failure to deliver, if it comes to that will result from the same dynamic that delivered Gorbachev’s failure – the stark discontinuities within and between the interests of the national elites and the nation itself. Should the central, centripetal myths start to break down, ready and waiting centrifugal forces will become irresistible.

    The American centre will be no more able to hold than the USSR’s was, and the anarchy loosed on the American people will probably surpass that unleashed on the peoples of the SSRs. As the heartland, Russia had the great advantage of 1000 years of cultural and political history as well as defined borders, so recovered in a couple of decades. The American heartland has neither, and there’ll be anarchy aplenty before it does.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cundalini
    China spreads prosperity and hope.
    The U.S spreads genetically modified food and pornography.

    Who's your money on?

    You are very naive. China cares only for China and considering Chinese like to eat and there is 1.4 billion of them someone will have to eat less. Add to this 1.4 billion Indians and them liking to eat well too. You get the picture. Here comes multi polar world

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Andrei Martyanov

    “One Belt One Road” should be called by its real name, the Chinese Full Employment Act, just like the H1b visa is the Keep India Employed visa, and the Eb5 “investor” visa is the Corrupt Chinese Get-out-of-Jail visa.
     
    You are very close on this one. In stripped down version this is precisely what it is. Meanwhile, American economic suicide by China will be studied for decades to come, especially by very delighted classic Marxists. That is if Trump completely fails. We'll see.

    Agree. I hope Russia leadership knows this.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Orwellian State
    "One Belt One Road" should be called by its real name, the Chinese Full Employment Act, just like the H1b visa is the Keep India Employed visa, and the Eb5 "investor" visa is the Corrupt Chinese Get-out-of-Jail visa.

    Bull’s eye. China is a selfish power. I see a lot of naive fans cheering about China rise but it is actually bad thing for the world. China cares for Chinese only and will suck the whole world dry for internal stability and mandate of heaven. There is not going ussr Russia style forgiven debt or international assistance to brotherly people. Once USA is turned very minor regional player, there is coming vaunted multi polar world mainly a can full of scorpions. But USA has only itself to blame both for helping enemy to rise and also for absolutely no sense of wisdom and proportion and decency ruining USA great opportunity in less than 30 years. Russia must play cards properly and start building itself based on own strenght. China is ovestrenghted and too dependent upon external resources to be the One long term.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • China spreads prosperity and hope.
    The U.S spreads genetically modified food and pornography.

    Who’s your money on?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    You are very naive. China cares only for China and considering Chinese like to eat and there is 1.4 billion of them someone will have to eat less. Add to this 1.4 billion Indians and them liking to eat well too. You get the picture. Here comes multi polar world
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jilles dykstra
    The Marshall Plan did not rebuild Europe.
    I can vaguely remember 1948, the Netherlands had repaired most of the war damage.
    My father had been busy doing that from the liberation.
    I do remember when he took me to a Bailey bridge, as he said, that had replaced the old bridge, as said, 'in de lucht laten vliegen', by the Germans.
    In de lucht laten vliegen, literally 'blown into the sky'.
    I looked up, and said 'I do not see anything'.
    Anyhow, the Bailey bridge was replaced under my father's supervision by a two lane concrete bridge.

    Marshall aid was given to prevent S and E European countrie from becoming communist.
    During the 1948 Italian election a large part of the USA fleet was anchored off the Italian coast, tanks had been landed already under a pretext.

    In Germany, Beetles were running off the production lines,as were pre war model Mercedeses, the Beetles already in 1945, I think.
    The British started production, contrary to the Morgenthau Plan, of killing ten million Germans through hunger, by removing all industry.
    As Churchill said to FDR 'I'm not going to be chained to a corpse'.

    At present the reverse, Brexit, Merkel has no intention to be chained to a corpse', whatever the Brussel bureaucrats want.

    Thanks for the corrections and clarifications. Of course, my major point was that the things I could think of that might begin to compare with the current Chinese global development initiative are not in the same league, and that even these are not typical. (Contrary to Hiro, who had suggested that the Chinese initiative was the sort of thing the US had led pre-Trump.) Your corrections suggest Hiro was even more wrong than I thought.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • This article is a act of supreme misdirection. Virtually everything is flipped 180 degrees from the truth. What the author touts as beneficial to the USA is in reality, detrimental. And vice versa. It is a ploy to convince the weak minded; poison wrapped in a delicious-smelling meatball.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Countries around the world have seen the results of “western values”, and rightfully oppose them. That said, I am still not convinced that OBOR is logistically feasible over the long run. It could turn out to be the biggest waste of money in human history.

    And did anyone notice that, in the Gallup poll, the countries that rated Trump the lowest are mostly western countries? That says something right there.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Funny, China and Russia are challenging us and in both cases it’s all our fault. We let corporations hand over our industry to China for their own short-term gain. We basically dared the Russians to become a competing world power when we expanded NATO to their doorstep, bombed Serbia, and supported color revolution in Georgia and Ukraine. No, America doesn’t deserve to run the world, too stupid and short-sighted. Let the Asians deal with it, they’re more pragmatic and are too ethnocentric to let (((them))) take control of their countries.

    Read More
    • Agree: bluedog
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twodees Partain
    STFU, Dilip. You and every other commie at TD can kiss my ass.

    Low effort boomerpost 0/10

    Read More
    • Troll: Twodees Partain
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Orwellian State
    "One Belt One Road" should be called by its real name, the Chinese Full Employment Act, just like the H1b visa is the Keep India Employed visa, and the Eb5 "investor" visa is the Corrupt Chinese Get-out-of-Jail visa.

    “One Belt One Road” should be called by its real name, the Chinese Full Employment Act, just like the H1b visa is the Keep India Employed visa, and the Eb5 “investor” visa is the Corrupt Chinese Get-out-of-Jail visa.

    You are very close on this one. In stripped down version this is precisely what it is. Meanwhile, American economic suicide by China will be studied for decades to come, especially by very delighted classic Marxists. That is if Trump completely fails. We’ll see.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    Agree. I hope Russia leadership knows this.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    Not only European leaders - I think that a number of American leaders also see that clear and present threat that Russia poses to the world through its promotion of extremism and active intervention in the politics of the United States. This has reached the extent to actual hack of voting machines, a projection of of how the brutally authoritarian government that by now has placed sympathizers such as Trump(who praises Putin at every moment the orange cheeseball can).

    China isn't much better but both countries being authoritarian means that they have limited understanding of genuine empathy and a rules-based sociey and therefore can be played off each other. Tactic American support for the recovering of former Chinese lands now called Siberia, for exmaple, should be traded until Russia removes invasion forces from Ukraine and allows for a free and open election to build toward a liberal democracy. After Russia is brought to heel, then China can also be mitigated and isolated and progressed toward a more friendly government. The people are not a problem in a the whole - Poland, South Korea and Japan are example of success stories of formerly regressive and xenophobic societies who can be brought and educated to universal values, but its important that the UN is active(and it cannot wit hthe stupid fake president) to prevent backsliding toward despotisim.

    There is a sickness to the "russian soul" a callous rudeness and lack of empathy for marginalized individuals, which filters into their government and worship of strongman characters. The upside is that thanks to growing awareness, this means that huge quantities of their society are active and bravely seeking change, such as women currently being forced into reactionary roles and literally being beaten to keep silent.

    https://www.hddocumentary.com/bbc-stacy-dooley-investigates-russias-war-on-women-2018/

    Why don’t you use an identifiable posting name? That way I, and perhaps others, too, could avoid wasting time on your sick drivel, much as many of us do whenever “Michael Kenny” drops a turd into the thread. Or perhaps, you are “Michael Kenny”, posting anonymously to simulate agreement with his unedifying, tedious posturings?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “One Belt One Road” should be called by its real name, the Chinese Full Employment Act, just like the H1b visa is the Keep India Employed visa, and the Eb5 “investor” visa is the Corrupt Chinese Get-out-of-Jail visa.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    “One Belt One Road” should be called by its real name, the Chinese Full Employment Act, just like the H1b visa is the Keep India Employed visa, and the Eb5 “investor” visa is the Corrupt Chinese Get-out-of-Jail visa.
     
    You are very close on this one. In stripped down version this is precisely what it is. Meanwhile, American economic suicide by China will be studied for decades to come, especially by very delighted classic Marxists. That is if Trump completely fails. We'll see.
    , @Sergey Krieger
    Bull's eye. China is a selfish power. I see a lot of naive fans cheering about China rise but it is actually bad thing for the world. China cares for Chinese only and will suck the whole world dry for internal stability and mandate of heaven. There is not going ussr Russia style forgiven debt or international assistance to brotherly people. Once USA is turned very minor regional player, there is coming vaunted multi polar world mainly a can full of scorpions. But USA has only itself to blame both for helping enemy to rise and also for absolutely no sense of wisdom and proportion and decency ruining USA great opportunity in less than 30 years. Russia must play cards properly and start building itself based on own strenght. China is ovestrenghted and too dependent upon external resources to be the One long term.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    Not only European leaders - I think that a number of American leaders also see that clear and present threat that Russia poses to the world through its promotion of extremism and active intervention in the politics of the United States. This has reached the extent to actual hack of voting machines, a projection of of how the brutally authoritarian government that by now has placed sympathizers such as Trump(who praises Putin at every moment the orange cheeseball can).

    China isn't much better but both countries being authoritarian means that they have limited understanding of genuine empathy and a rules-based sociey and therefore can be played off each other. Tactic American support for the recovering of former Chinese lands now called Siberia, for exmaple, should be traded until Russia removes invasion forces from Ukraine and allows for a free and open election to build toward a liberal democracy. After Russia is brought to heel, then China can also be mitigated and isolated and progressed toward a more friendly government. The people are not a problem in a the whole - Poland, South Korea and Japan are example of success stories of formerly regressive and xenophobic societies who can be brought and educated to universal values, but its important that the UN is active(and it cannot wit hthe stupid fake president) to prevent backsliding toward despotisim.

    There is a sickness to the "russian soul" a callous rudeness and lack of empathy for marginalized individuals, which filters into their government and worship of strongman characters. The upside is that thanks to growing awareness, this means that huge quantities of their society are active and bravely seeking change, such as women currently being forced into reactionary roles and literally being beaten to keep silent.

    https://www.hddocumentary.com/bbc-stacy-dooley-investigates-russias-war-on-women-2018/

    Considering this invention of astronomic power of Russian influence possible everything and anything only project of desperate weakness of defensive apparatus of US and western countries.
    It is called double edged sword.
    It makes Russians laugh so much that they are rolling on the floor.
    Concerning you, you are total and absolutely idiotic POS.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    still laughing? your little pieces of "soviet" engineering are burning with stinking vodka-infused flesh in them now and with anything who trusts those worthless deathtraps against American firepower. You've had your little heyday before when we backed down but now its time to run back and hide with your head between your little legs and do autofellatio in the quite dark with Sheriff Mattis on the watch.

    http://www.businessinsider.com/a-us-jet-destroyed-a-russian-t-72-battle-tank-in-self-defense-in-syria-2018-2


    Russia strong! Very strong! In hell, now, being strong! Now get the fuck out of Crimea you bandits.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Hmmm
    Agree.

    But let's rant a little bit. Let's take one example from the article:
    America... "in its urge to build walls of every kind and shut so many people out"

    I am not American, but I do know that the US has the highest immigration rate in the world (when combining legal and illegal immigration). But that understates what is going on. US is undertaking one of the most rapid, and comprehensive demographic transformations the world has never seen. It is literally replacing its native population with such viciousness and carelessness that it completely escapes any rational analysis.

    And yet the people still get:
    "in its urge to build walls of every kind and shut so many people out"

    How do these people square the circles in their heads all the time? I mean, I know some of them are dollar store propagandists. But not all of them. Some of them actually believe. Scary.

    Look at his name. Dilip Hiro. Wonder no longer about why he is on the Immivasion Bandwagon.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    Not only European leaders - I think that a number of American leaders also see that clear and present threat that Russia poses to the world through its promotion of extremism and active intervention in the politics of the United States. This has reached the extent to actual hack of voting machines, a projection of of how the brutally authoritarian government that by now has placed sympathizers such as Trump(who praises Putin at every moment the orange cheeseball can).

    China isn't much better but both countries being authoritarian means that they have limited understanding of genuine empathy and a rules-based sociey and therefore can be played off each other. Tactic American support for the recovering of former Chinese lands now called Siberia, for exmaple, should be traded until Russia removes invasion forces from Ukraine and allows for a free and open election to build toward a liberal democracy. After Russia is brought to heel, then China can also be mitigated and isolated and progressed toward a more friendly government. The people are not a problem in a the whole - Poland, South Korea and Japan are example of success stories of formerly regressive and xenophobic societies who can be brought and educated to universal values, but its important that the UN is active(and it cannot wit hthe stupid fake president) to prevent backsliding toward despotisim.

    There is a sickness to the "russian soul" a callous rudeness and lack of empathy for marginalized individuals, which filters into their government and worship of strongman characters. The upside is that thanks to growing awareness, this means that huge quantities of their society are active and bravely seeking change, such as women currently being forced into reactionary roles and literally being beaten to keep silent.

    https://www.hddocumentary.com/bbc-stacy-dooley-investigates-russias-war-on-women-2018/

    Not only European leaders – I think that a number of American leaders also see that clear and present threat that Russia poses to the world through its promotion of extremism and active intervention in the politics of the United States.

    That is total Hasbara Central crap – it serves Israel – not America.

    Think Peace — Art

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • …and at the end no mention of Izruel. The dot head shows his true colors there as Indians are mostly pro Zionists since they both have a common enemy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • This is the kind of globalist fearmongering that you expect to see in msm, not in an “alternative” news source like Unz Review. But since it’s here, let’s discuss the points brought up:

    TPP
    The idea of this trade deal is supposedly to encircle China. However, the Chinese are no dummies. As soon as Obama drafted the plan, they were already busy moving their manufacturing to Malaysia, Vietnam etc. to take full advantage of TPP. The end result is like Ping Pong in the Olympics, no matter which “country” is competing against which “country”, China always sweeps the podium, because all the players in countries like Norway, France, Brazil etc. are all Chinese nationals who emigrated there to gain access to the Olympics. These TPP countries are just front men for China. Trump was right to cancel it. Only a dumb naive Democrap like Obama could put together such a deal. The Chinese are 10 steps ahead of him.

    Climate Change
    LOL France can have all the climate change “scientists” they want. Take them all, and be sure to take all their “green energy” lobbyists with them to France.

    China’s One Belt One Road
    If the Europeans want their manufacturing sector further decimated by even cheaper Chinese goods, let them have at it. But what will they do with all the uneducated migrants they keep taking in? What kind of jobs will they give them if not mindless factory work? How many falafel stands do they need in Berlin or Paris? And btw how exactly is the US to “participate” in this? Europe and Asia share a landmass, while the US is a vast ocean away from each. Meanwhile, don’t count on this project achieving its aim either, it still has to go through too many shithole “stan” countries, I foresee bombings and sabotages along this route when China does not play nice, i.e. bribe these despotic regimes in one way or another.

    In the Middle East…
    No question the US strategy in the Mideast is a complete fail. Trump as America’s first Jewish president is making things worse, making unnecessary enemies with Assad, Iran and Russia to please his Zionist overlords. The Russians are great at playing chess, and Putin is a grand master. Despite Trump die-hards’ claims of Trump playing 6th dimensional or 13th dimensional chess with every bad move he’s made, including continuing on with this illegal invasion of Syria, Trump is a dumb megalomaniac being jerked around by the neocon Zionists Pence has him surrounded with. America’s Mideast problem begins and ends with Israel. It used to be about oil, but we don’t need the oil anymore, now it’s all about Israel. This is not a solvable problem as long as the swamp is not cleaned out of DC, and it’s not going to be with the two biggest Zionists to ever occupy the WH (Trump and Pence) still at the helm. Pence and his BFF Paul Ryan are two of the biggest swamp creatures in DC. The swamp is not going to clean itself out, it’ll just replenish it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • America is isolated. We and the world are at odds. The people of this planet need nor infrastructure and trade – NOT more war.

    The US Jews have congress, Trump, and his generals locked into a war path. This is a grave crime!

    Every US general is pro-Israel — how can this be?

    Clearly Trump is pro-Israel.

    AIPAC’s congress just gave the MIC 150,000,000,000 more dollars to fight Israel’s enemies.

    The three entities are funding more confrontations with – Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Syria, Iran, Lebanon, and north Africa. The tribal Jew agenda just rolls on and on.

    This does ZERO good for America. We are not making things better in any of those lands. We are now on the dark side of human evolution.

    The Jews are eating America up — consuming our wealth – and trashing our culture. We must return to being builders – not destroyers.

    Think Peace — Art

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    Not only European leaders - I think that a number of American leaders also see that clear and present threat that Russia poses to the world through its promotion of extremism and active intervention in the politics of the United States. This has reached the extent to actual hack of voting machines, a projection of of how the brutally authoritarian government that by now has placed sympathizers such as Trump(who praises Putin at every moment the orange cheeseball can).

    China isn't much better but both countries being authoritarian means that they have limited understanding of genuine empathy and a rules-based sociey and therefore can be played off each other. Tactic American support for the recovering of former Chinese lands now called Siberia, for exmaple, should be traded until Russia removes invasion forces from Ukraine and allows for a free and open election to build toward a liberal democracy. After Russia is brought to heel, then China can also be mitigated and isolated and progressed toward a more friendly government. The people are not a problem in a the whole - Poland, South Korea and Japan are example of success stories of formerly regressive and xenophobic societies who can be brought and educated to universal values, but its important that the UN is active(and it cannot wit hthe stupid fake president) to prevent backsliding toward despotisim.

    There is a sickness to the "russian soul" a callous rudeness and lack of empathy for marginalized individuals, which filters into their government and worship of strongman characters. The upside is that thanks to growing awareness, this means that huge quantities of their society are active and bravely seeking change, such as women currently being forced into reactionary roles and literally being beaten to keep silent.

    https://www.hddocumentary.com/bbc-stacy-dooley-investigates-russias-war-on-women-2018/

    this has to be the best cool aide drinking writing I have ever seen.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Michael Kenny
    Most European leaders would see the rise of China as being in Europe's interest. US attempts to undermine the EU and US unwillingness to defend Europe against Putin's revisionism have undermined European confidence in the US as a reliable ally. Equally, Chinese plans for the Big Island (Asia, Europe and Africa) undermine Putin's attempts to dominate both Europe and Asia. That Trump is slowly destroying the US is perfectly clear. If he remains in the White House until 2025, there will probably be little left of American power and, since the US "business model" is built, preciesly, on that power, there will probably be little left of the US economy either. The US collapse will probably also bring about the collapse of Israel. I'm not sure anything will change any of that but unless Trump is just going to lie down and die, he needs a war to restore US credibility. He can bawl and bellow all he wants about North Korea or Iran but the only war that counts is the war on Putin. Putin has challenged US supremacy by attacking Ukraine and the only credible way of restoring that supremecy is to get Putin out of Ukraine. One way or the other.

    Not only European leaders – I think that a number of American leaders also see that clear and present threat that Russia poses to the world through its promotion of extremism and active intervention in the politics of the United States. This has reached the extent to actual hack of voting machines, a projection of of how the brutally authoritarian government that by now has placed sympathizers such as Trump(who praises Putin at every moment the orange cheeseball can).

    China isn’t much better but both countries being authoritarian means that they have limited understanding of genuine empathy and a rules-based sociey and therefore can be played off each other. Tactic American support for the recovering of former Chinese lands now called Siberia, for exmaple, should be traded until Russia removes invasion forces from Ukraine and allows for a free and open election to build toward a liberal democracy. After Russia is brought to heel, then China can also be mitigated and isolated and progressed toward a more friendly government. The people are not a problem in a the whole – Poland, South Korea and Japan are example of success stories of formerly regressive and xenophobic societies who can be brought and educated to universal values, but its important that the UN is active(and it cannot wit hthe stupid fake president) to prevent backsliding toward despotisim.

    There is a sickness to the “russian soul” a callous rudeness and lack of empathy for marginalized individuals, which filters into their government and worship of strongman characters. The upside is that thanks to growing awareness, this means that huge quantities of their society are active and bravely seeking change, such as women currently being forced into reactionary roles and literally being beaten to keep silent.

    https://www.hddocumentary.com/bbc-stacy-dooley-investigates-russias-war-on-women-2018/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    this has to be the best cool aide drinking writing I have ever seen.
    , @Art

    Not only European leaders – I think that a number of American leaders also see that clear and present threat that Russia poses to the world through its promotion of extremism and active intervention in the politics of the United States.
     
    That is total Hasbara Central crap - it serves Israel - not America.

    Think Peace --- Art
    , @Ilyana_Rozumova
    Considering this invention of astronomic power of Russian influence possible everything and anything only project of desperate weakness of defensive apparatus of US and western countries.
    It is called double edged sword.
    It makes Russians laugh so much that they are rolling on the floor.
    Concerning you, you are total and absolutely idiotic POS.
    , @JerseyJeffersonian
    Why don't you use an identifiable posting name? That way I, and perhaps others, too, could avoid wasting time on your sick drivel, much as many of us do whenever "Michael Kenny" drops a turd into the thread. Or perhaps, you are "Michael Kenny", posting anonymously to simulate agreement with his unedifying, tedious posturings?
    , @yurivku
    Wow! Now I see where US gets the imbeciles from for her President's administration and how you fill the Congress hall chairs!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Michael Kenny
    Most European leaders would see the rise of China as being in Europe's interest. US attempts to undermine the EU and US unwillingness to defend Europe against Putin's revisionism have undermined European confidence in the US as a reliable ally. Equally, Chinese plans for the Big Island (Asia, Europe and Africa) undermine Putin's attempts to dominate both Europe and Asia. That Trump is slowly destroying the US is perfectly clear. If he remains in the White House until 2025, there will probably be little left of American power and, since the US "business model" is built, preciesly, on that power, there will probably be little left of the US economy either. The US collapse will probably also bring about the collapse of Israel. I'm not sure anything will change any of that but unless Trump is just going to lie down and die, he needs a war to restore US credibility. He can bawl and bellow all he wants about North Korea or Iran but the only war that counts is the war on Putin. Putin has challenged US supremacy by attacking Ukraine and the only credible way of restoring that supremecy is to get Putin out of Ukraine. One way or the other.

    I think the old line of Putin attacking the Ukraine died long ago in propaganda land, and here you are trying to raise it from the dead,good-luck with that one..,.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I do envisage (from the point of efficiency) to be circular double lined artery of the Eurasian trade and tourism, to which each country of interest (including China) to be connected by their own vein system.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jilles dykstra
    George F. Kennan, ´Memoirs 1925 – 1950’, New York 1967, 1972 was the spiritual father of the Marshall plan, and executed the plan.
    He had quite different ideas.

    George F. Kennan, ´Memoirs 1925 – 1950’, New York 1967, 1972 was the spiritual father of the Marshall plan, and executed the plan.
    He had quite different ideas.

    In my book, Kennan was a pretty decent person for a bureaucrat although he changed his views somewhat late in the game.

    I’ll have to research his views on the Marshall Plan, but I suspect that if he approved, he was a bit off the mark. I’m suspect, as well about the claim that he was the spiritual father of it.

    In any case, I’d be interested in what you think his ideas were vis a vis the plan, and I still believe it was another “elite” rip-off of the usual dupes such as me and those in my economic class. No doubt it was done to benefit the .0001%.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jilles dykstra
    " British /American Imperial parallels are interesting, and it’s true the British elite did pull back from Empire because the cost/benefit calculation changed after WWI – the cost became an impossible burden. "

    Nowhere saw anything that the British elite pulled back, on the contrary, nothing made Churchill so mad at FDR than the idea that India should be independent.
    About costs, already before WWI GB could no longer maintain the the two fleet standard, that is, the Navy should be able to fight, with success, the next two strongest fleets.
    Obama lowered the two war standard to one and a half.
    What a half war is, I wonder.
    Then the GB elite after WWII, the official exchange rate of the pound sterling was maintained despite all consequences.
    SO, when the war was over, food was even more scarce than during the war, when Lendlease was a great help.
    What the British public was never told was that Lendlease was with a huge price tag: liberating trade in the empire to outsiders.
    Hero Churchill was the undertaker of the empire, the 1941 Hess documents still are classified, the only explanation can be that Hess came with very reasonable peace proposals.
    This of course cannot be.
    The book written by the British historian Charley, he is a critic of Churchill, never appeared in original english, just in a german translation;
    John Charmley, ‘Der Untergang des Britischen Empires, Roosevelt – Churchill und Amerikas Weg zur Weltmacht’, Graz 2005
    Translation:
    The end of the British empire, FDR Churchill, and the USA's road to world power

    Every expense in WW2 US charged to England. England did own all railroads in US and was forced to sell to US private interests. Including large number of English own companies. To pay the debt.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Syrian ‘Civil War’, lol.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Twodees Partain
    "The pointed omission of any reference to these clear motivations calls into question Hiro’s competence as an analyst of international affairs, and even his personal honesty."

    My sentiments exactly. What some editors view as valid in the writings of the "dissident left" is usually the use by leftists of certain components from their list of ideas that have been expressed by those who oppose their agenda, to get a reader to swallow items of the left's agenda.

    Hiro, and others at TD seem to imagine that they have managed to get the reader to nod along with them as they read his own words back to him, while they lead him to a conclusion that only a diseased mind could accept.

    It's foolish to accept any leftist as an ally. Leftists can never be true allies because they are, in the end, leftists.

    Hmmmmmm! the article is more like harebrained collection of presented facts, and not so much of an analysis.
    For me it is difficult to verify which facts are true and which are fantasy.
    One of the facts he mentioned that Silk road will go through Russia, I did find to be incorrect. Silk road will go through Kazakhstan. (Less roads and railways to cross}
    But the article is still refreshing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jacques sheete
    Jyles, here's a quote and a link to a very good antidote to the myth that the Marshall Plan was intended to "save" Europe. It was a shakedown of the middle and working classes by the economic "elite" as usual.

    It's short and to the point.



    The actual legacy of the Marshall Plan was a vast expansion of government at home, the beginnings of the Cold War rhetoric that would sustain the welfare-warfare state for 40 years, a permanent global troop presence, and an entire business class on the take from Washington. It also created a belief on the part of the ruling elite in D.C. that it could trick the public into backing anything, including the idea that government and its connected interest groups should run the world at taxpayer expense.


    Tucker, Jeffrey A. "The Marshall Plan Myth." The Free Market 15, no. 9 (September 1997).

    https://mises.org/library/marshall-plan-myth
     

    George F. Kennan, ´Memoirs 1925 – 1950’, New York 1967, 1972 was the spiritual father of the Marshall plan, and executed the plan.
    He had quite different ideas.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    George F. Kennan, ´Memoirs 1925 – 1950’, New York 1967, 1972 was the spiritual father of the Marshall plan, and executed the plan.
    He had quite different ideas.
     
    In my book, Kennan was a pretty decent person for a bureaucrat although he changed his views somewhat late in the game.

    I'll have to research his views on the Marshall Plan, but I suspect that if he approved, he was a bit off the mark. I'm suspect, as well about the claim that he was the spiritual father of it.

    In any case, I'd be interested in what you think his ideas were vis a vis the plan, and I still believe it was another "elite" rip-off of the usual dupes such as me and those in my economic class. No doubt it was done to benefit the .0001%.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Miro23

    Maybe the present USA government does have a cost benefit analysis, and concluded that the USA empire costs more than the benefits.
     
    British /American Imperial parallels are interesting, and it's true the British elite did pull back from Empire because the cost/benefit calculation changed after WWI - the cost became an impossible burden.

    The US is different, because the US elite isn't concerned about the national cost or the burden placed on the public. They've already proved this, by putting the public something like $ 6 Trillion in debt to pay for Middle East wars, with themselves and their MSM still pushing for more (Syria, Iran).

    US policy is dictated to Congress (and the administration) by an elite that is concerned with (in order of probable importance) 1) The Likud view of Israel's security - military and economic 2) continued MIC billion dollar special funding 3) Finance, Outsourcers & Globalists for the free flow of capital, goods and cheap labour.

    The aptly described "Grotesque" Hillary Clinton brought all this together as the Democratic candidate.

    ” British /American Imperial parallels are interesting, and it’s true the British elite did pull back from Empire because the cost/benefit calculation changed after WWI – the cost became an impossible burden. ”

    Nowhere saw anything that the British elite pulled back, on the contrary, nothing made Churchill so mad at FDR than the idea that India should be independent.
    About costs, already before WWI GB could no longer maintain the the two fleet standard, that is, the Navy should be able to fight, with success, the next two strongest fleets.
    Obama lowered the two war standard to one and a half.
    What a half war is, I wonder.
    Then the GB elite after WWII, the official exchange rate of the pound sterling was maintained despite all consequences.
    SO, when the war was over, food was even more scarce than during the war, when Lendlease was a great help.
    What the British public was never told was that Lendlease was with a huge price tag: liberating trade in the empire to outsiders.
    Hero Churchill was the undertaker of the empire, the 1941 Hess documents still are classified, the only explanation can be that Hess came with very reasonable peace proposals.
    This of course cannot be.
    The book written by the British historian Charley, he is a critic of Churchill, never appeared in original english, just in a german translation;
    John Charmley, ‘Der Untergang des Britischen Empires, Roosevelt – Churchill und Amerikas Weg zur Weltmacht’, Graz 2005
    Translation:
    The end of the British empire, FDR Churchill, and the USA’s road to world power

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
    Every expense in WW2 US charged to England. England did own all railroads in US and was forced to sell to US private interests. Including large number of English own companies. To pay the debt.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jilles dykstra
    The Marshall Plan did not rebuild Europe.
    I can vaguely remember 1948, the Netherlands had repaired most of the war damage.
    My father had been busy doing that from the liberation.
    I do remember when he took me to a Bailey bridge, as he said, that had replaced the old bridge, as said, 'in de lucht laten vliegen', by the Germans.
    In de lucht laten vliegen, literally 'blown into the sky'.
    I looked up, and said 'I do not see anything'.
    Anyhow, the Bailey bridge was replaced under my father's supervision by a two lane concrete bridge.

    Marshall aid was given to prevent S and E European countrie from becoming communist.
    During the 1948 Italian election a large part of the USA fleet was anchored off the Italian coast, tanks had been landed already under a pretext.

    In Germany, Beetles were running off the production lines,as were pre war model Mercedeses, the Beetles already in 1945, I think.
    The British started production, contrary to the Morgenthau Plan, of killing ten million Germans through hunger, by removing all industry.
    As Churchill said to FDR 'I'm not going to be chained to a corpse'.

    At present the reverse, Brexit, Merkel has no intention to be chained to a corpse', whatever the Brussel bureaucrats want.

    Jyles, here’s a quote and a link to a very good antidote to the myth that the Marshall Plan was intended to “save” Europe. It was a shakedown of the middle and working classes by the economic “elite” as usual.

    It’s short and to the point.

    The actual legacy of the Marshall Plan was a vast expansion of government at home, the beginnings of the Cold War rhetoric that would sustain the welfare-warfare state for 40 years, a permanent global troop presence, and an entire business class on the take from Washington. It also created a belief on the part of the ruling elite in D.C. that it could trick the public into backing anything, including the idea that government and its connected interest groups should run the world at taxpayer expense.

    Tucker, Jeffrey A. “The Marshall Plan Myth.” The Free Market 15, no. 9 (September 1997).

    https://mises.org/library/marshall-plan-myth

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    George F. Kennan, ´Memoirs 1925 – 1950’, New York 1967, 1972 was the spiritual father of the Marshall plan, and executed the plan.
    He had quite different ideas.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Dillip,

    The Trump admin. may have been unwise in terms of the interests of upper-class Americans and their recently arrived lackeys, like you.

    It is great for all of the places that were being pressed to join. The intention and effect would to have been to force any and all of U.S.A.’s ridiculous copyright and trademark terms, and bizarre patent judgments, in place throughout the zone.

    Everyone is better off out of it. Some of the places aready had bilat. deals, did the same things. More fool them.

    Except for shareholders and bosses of big pharma, Hollywood, the U.S.A. patent pirate industry, I would expect the fall of the pact to have a positive effect in the U.S.A,, too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon • Disclaimer says:

    What an empty article in unz. There are too many low quality, googled cut n paste articles filled with nonsense now in unz.

    Just for sake to highlight what this writer utter emptiness:

    President Obama had worked on the agreement for almost eight years, … Still, he left office without submitting it for approval to Congress.

    Writer don’t even read what is TPP to quote, that will handover countries power to coporates that yes to contained China, but benefits capitalists on expense of all people . And Trump already had declared he will scrap TPP even its signed, so wtf writer is talking of obomma Hussein not submit before he exit as Potus?

    In opposition to Trump, eight American states, all invested in speeding up the use of electric vehicles, remained committed to the Paris Agreement. So, too, did a private-sector coalition..

    Everyone know Paris Agreement is great for the world future, help developing countries, best for China. But US don’t give a damn to the world future if it don’t benefit Uncle Scam pocket. Trump knew this too well, only Oboma pretense to be a saint with both hands dripping with war bloods.

    another major Chinese initiative — the Asian International Investment Bank.

    Even this AIIB abbr he don’t understand, its Asian Infrastructure Inv Bank.

    Those assets are capped by Putin’s 18 years in high office, which have enabled him to see the fruition of his policies in a way no American president could.

    US has unparalleled military MIC, global oil & gas control, and nuclear industries, even absolute financial control, what potus could not match in all these resources except their moron brain vs Putin?

    And more Egypt nonsense, not knowing it has long history of close alliance since Soviet era.

    chanting his mantra of “America First,” Donald Trump has so far followed policies that have only eased the way for the Chinese dragon to roar past Uncle Sam, with the Russian bear not far behind.

    Trumps is only the potus to receive the accumulated shits from previous many potus, that he tried to correct some but resisted by deep states and moronic Americans. Today US declination is not done in one day, but long history of endless wars, capitalist lobbyists sucking out every marrow and numerous absurd policies. There is no other hope but an economic disaster to collapse the evil empire to restart, thus saving the Americans and the world from apocalypse.

    Such article like many in unz, is a waste of my data and time even to click on, what Unz has become now…another overflowing shit hole like Globalresearch now flooded with low quality writers competing for readership with loud titles but empty contents.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Randal
    Good to see Unz publishing some globalist, interventionist nonsense as well, for diversity, though it's hardly as though there's a shortage of this stuff in the mainstream media. I suppose that's the problem with publishing leftist supposedly dissident stuff like TomDispatch - leftists are inherently globalist and interventionist and so can be relied upon to ultimately subvert and let down any resistance to those trends.

    Dilip Hiro's piece is quite inspiring though, and certainly renews my faith in my (non-voting, obviously) support for Trump in 2016. It's notably simplistic to the point of being dishonest in parts, however. For instance:

    [Putin's] alliance with Assad had three dimensions: Syria’s historic links to the Soviet Union in the Cold War era; the Kremlin’s desire to have a naval facility in the Mediterranean after the loss of such a port in Libya when Muammar Gaddafi fell in 2011; and his doctrine that any group that takes up arms against an internationally recognized government is a terrorist organization.
     
    The first two points are legitimate, albeit their relative importance can be questioned. The third as stated is absurd and clearly selectively propagandist in intent.

    No mention of the likely real drivers of Russian intervention - concern to prevent another victory for islamist jihadism that would likely threaten Russia's own muslim areas with further disorder, and concern to resist the US sphere's advance and its "regime changing" of yet another country.

    The pointed omission of any reference to these clear motivations calls into question Hiro's competence as an analyst of international affairs, and even his personal honesty.

    “The pointed omission of any reference to these clear motivations calls into question Hiro’s competence as an analyst of international affairs, and even his personal honesty.”

    My sentiments exactly. What some editors view as valid in the writings of the “dissident left” is usually the use by leftists of certain components from their list of ideas that have been expressed by those who oppose their agenda, to get a reader to swallow items of the left’s agenda.

    Hiro, and others at TD seem to imagine that they have managed to get the reader to nod along with them as they read his own words back to him, while they lead him to a conclusion that only a diseased mind could accept.

    It’s foolish to accept any leftist as an ally. Leftists can never be true allies because they are, in the end, leftists.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
    Hmmmmmm! the article is more like harebrained collection of presented facts, and not so much of an analysis.
    For me it is difficult to verify which facts are true and which are fantasy.
    One of the facts he mentioned that Silk road will go through Russia, I did find to be incorrect. Silk road will go through Kazakhstan. (Less roads and railways to cross}
    But the article is still refreshing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jilles dykstra
    Already in the thirties many in GB understood that GB could no longer afford its empire.
    Never anywhere saw a cost benefit analysis, cost, at the time, of Brittannia rules the waves, against benefits from colonial possessions, in particular India.
    Lawrence R. Pratt, 'East of Malta, West of Suez', London, 1975

    Never saw so clearly explained the British dilemma, they could not afford to control at the same time the Mediterranean, and the Far East.
    There was much talk about the bastion Singapore, so when it fell the British were shocked.
    They were also shocked when the battle ships Repulse and Prince of Wales were sunk by aircraft flown by little yellow men.
    As was the British navy, until then it was not believed that aircraft were a threat to battle ships.

    I wonder if the USA today is in the same position as the British inn the thirties.
    If the USA is, I hope it does not lead to desperate measures, as the British guarantees that unleashed WWII.

    Maybe the present USA government does have a cost benefit analysis, and concluded that the USA empire costs more than the benefits.

    Maybe the present USA government does have a cost benefit analysis, and concluded that the USA empire costs more than the benefits.

    British /American Imperial parallels are interesting, and it’s true the British elite did pull back from Empire because the cost/benefit calculation changed after WWI – the cost became an impossible burden.

    The US is different, because the US elite isn’t concerned about the national cost or the burden placed on the public. They’ve already proved this, by putting the public something like $ 6 Trillion in debt to pay for Middle East wars, with themselves and their MSM still pushing for more (Syria, Iran).

    US policy is dictated to Congress (and the administration) by an elite that is concerned with (in order of probable importance) 1) The Likud view of Israel’s security – military and economic 2) continued MIC billion dollar special funding 3) Finance, Outsourcers & Globalists for the free flow of capital, goods and cheap labour.

    The aptly described “Grotesque” Hillary Clinton brought all this together as the Democratic candidate.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    " British /American Imperial parallels are interesting, and it’s true the British elite did pull back from Empire because the cost/benefit calculation changed after WWI – the cost became an impossible burden. "

    Nowhere saw anything that the British elite pulled back, on the contrary, nothing made Churchill so mad at FDR than the idea that India should be independent.
    About costs, already before WWI GB could no longer maintain the the two fleet standard, that is, the Navy should be able to fight, with success, the next two strongest fleets.
    Obama lowered the two war standard to one and a half.
    What a half war is, I wonder.
    Then the GB elite after WWII, the official exchange rate of the pound sterling was maintained despite all consequences.
    SO, when the war was over, food was even more scarce than during the war, when Lendlease was a great help.
    What the British public was never told was that Lendlease was with a huge price tag: liberating trade in the empire to outsiders.
    Hero Churchill was the undertaker of the empire, the 1941 Hess documents still are classified, the only explanation can be that Hess came with very reasonable peace proposals.
    This of course cannot be.
    The book written by the British historian Charley, he is a critic of Churchill, never appeared in original english, just in a german translation;
    John Charmley, ‘Der Untergang des Britischen Empires, Roosevelt – Churchill und Amerikas Weg zur Weltmacht’, Graz 2005
    Translation:
    The end of the British empire, FDR Churchill, and the USA's road to world power
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Most European leaders would see the rise of China as being in Europe’s interest. US attempts to undermine the EU and US unwillingness to defend Europe against Putin’s revisionism have undermined European confidence in the US as a reliable ally. Equally, Chinese plans for the Big Island (Asia, Europe and Africa) undermine Putin’s attempts to dominate both Europe and Asia. That Trump is slowly destroying the US is perfectly clear. If he remains in the White House until 2025, there will probably be little left of American power and, since the US “business model” is built, preciesly, on that power, there will probably be little left of the US economy either. The US collapse will probably also bring about the collapse of Israel. I’m not sure anything will change any of that but unless Trump is just going to lie down and die, he needs a war to restore US credibility. He can bawl and bellow all he wants about North Korea or Iran but the only war that counts is the war on Putin. Putin has challenged US supremacy by attacking Ukraine and the only credible way of restoring that supremecy is to get Putin out of Ukraine. One way or the other.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bluedog
    I think the old line of Putin attacking the Ukraine died long ago in propaganda land, and here you are trying to raise it from the dead,good-luck with that one..,.
    , @anonymous
    Not only European leaders - I think that a number of American leaders also see that clear and present threat that Russia poses to the world through its promotion of extremism and active intervention in the politics of the United States. This has reached the extent to actual hack of voting machines, a projection of of how the brutally authoritarian government that by now has placed sympathizers such as Trump(who praises Putin at every moment the orange cheeseball can).

    China isn't much better but both countries being authoritarian means that they have limited understanding of genuine empathy and a rules-based sociey and therefore can be played off each other. Tactic American support for the recovering of former Chinese lands now called Siberia, for exmaple, should be traded until Russia removes invasion forces from Ukraine and allows for a free and open election to build toward a liberal democracy. After Russia is brought to heel, then China can also be mitigated and isolated and progressed toward a more friendly government. The people are not a problem in a the whole - Poland, South Korea and Japan are example of success stories of formerly regressive and xenophobic societies who can be brought and educated to universal values, but its important that the UN is active(and it cannot wit hthe stupid fake president) to prevent backsliding toward despotisim.

    There is a sickness to the "russian soul" a callous rudeness and lack of empathy for marginalized individuals, which filters into their government and worship of strongman characters. The upside is that thanks to growing awareness, this means that huge quantities of their society are active and bravely seeking change, such as women currently being forced into reactionary roles and literally being beaten to keep silent.

    https://www.hddocumentary.com/bbc-stacy-dooley-investigates-russias-war-on-women-2018/

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Congratulations to the author,
    Dis-information Involves blending known truths with acceptable arguments with false fabrications.
    You have indeed blended historical facts with political/economic/cultural arguments with false fabrications on the Trump Administration’s goals, strategies, and motives.
    Congratulations!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Randal
    Good to see Unz publishing some globalist, interventionist nonsense as well, for diversity, though it's hardly as though there's a shortage of this stuff in the mainstream media. I suppose that's the problem with publishing leftist supposedly dissident stuff like TomDispatch - leftists are inherently globalist and interventionist and so can be relied upon to ultimately subvert and let down any resistance to those trends.

    Dilip Hiro's piece is quite inspiring though, and certainly renews my faith in my (non-voting, obviously) support for Trump in 2016. It's notably simplistic to the point of being dishonest in parts, however. For instance:

    [Putin's] alliance with Assad had three dimensions: Syria’s historic links to the Soviet Union in the Cold War era; the Kremlin’s desire to have a naval facility in the Mediterranean after the loss of such a port in Libya when Muammar Gaddafi fell in 2011; and his doctrine that any group that takes up arms against an internationally recognized government is a terrorist organization.
     
    The first two points are legitimate, albeit their relative importance can be questioned. The third as stated is absurd and clearly selectively propagandist in intent.

    No mention of the likely real drivers of Russian intervention - concern to prevent another victory for islamist jihadism that would likely threaten Russia's own muslim areas with further disorder, and concern to resist the US sphere's advance and its "regime changing" of yet another country.

    The pointed omission of any reference to these clear motivations calls into question Hiro's competence as an analyst of international affairs, and even his personal honesty.

    No mention of the likely real drivers of Russian intervention

    American pundits who pretend to know about outside world usually struggle mightily with the issue of causality. In their opinion the wind blows because trees are moving.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A meandering and largely confused piece which, as it is a tradition in the US, completely lacks a sense of scale and proportion. Per Arctic Road, the author obviously doesn’t understand a mechanics of it as well as China’s recent White Book precisely on this issue–a tacit admission that China lacks power and resources for now (if ever) to face off US Navy in Indian Ocean, while in the North she will continue to be dependent on both Russia’s massive icebreaker fleet and Navy. But then there is a US-China plan on LNG. At this point, IIRC, China has only one new conventional ice-breaker being built and this one is a Finnish design.

    According to The Economist, 86% of OBOR projects already underway use Chinese contractors, which allows China to employ the excess capacity it built up in steel and cement during its rapid industrialization phase.

    Well, that is the whole trick of OBOR–it is hardly localized with Chinese primarily taking it upon themselves in building it, often to a huge dissatisfaction of locals who are relegated to the status of observers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Miro23

    Beijing’s drive to have a footprint abroad and extend the OBOR concept beyond Eurasia, particularly to Africa, has been impressive. Between 1976 and 2016, for instance, China built five major railway lines in Africa, deploying 50,000 Chinese workers to complete the 1,150-mile Tanzania-Zambia Railway. Eight more rail projects are now underway.
     
    This has to be interesting. In the 19th Century it was the world's dominant industrial producer, Great Britain, that was building infrastructure around the world to enable Imperial trade.

    In the 21st Century it's the world's dominant industrial producer , China, that is building infrastructure around the world to enable its (Imperial?) trade. China lacks the equivalent military power of the 19th Century British, but like the British it mostly wasn't necessary. The British Empire grew out of trading posts and local trade agreements, joint projects etc.

    China lacks the equivalent military power of the 19th Century British, but like the British it mostly wasn’t necessary. The British Empire grew out of trading posts and local trade agreements, joint projects etc.

    I suppose the concern is that as the British global military dominion grew out of the need to protect far flung imperial possessions and profits, so the equivalent will come with the Chinese.

    Of course, the kind of military confrontation and containment policies advocated by some China hawks around the US regime will only make Chinese militarisation a certainty, and accelerate it dramatically.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • It’s sad that politics has dropped to the lesser of 2 evils but it has, everyone who wants 50 asks for a hundred, the super rich are raping everyone and the only man who has the guts to call them out is taking shit from all angles. He ain’t perfect but he’s miles ahead of his competition.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jilles dykstra
    The Marshall Plan did not rebuild Europe.
    I can vaguely remember 1948, the Netherlands had repaired most of the war damage.
    My father had been busy doing that from the liberation.
    I do remember when he took me to a Bailey bridge, as he said, that had replaced the old bridge, as said, 'in de lucht laten vliegen', by the Germans.
    In de lucht laten vliegen, literally 'blown into the sky'.
    I looked up, and said 'I do not see anything'.
    Anyhow, the Bailey bridge was replaced under my father's supervision by a two lane concrete bridge.

    Marshall aid was given to prevent S and E European countrie from becoming communist.
    During the 1948 Italian election a large part of the USA fleet was anchored off the Italian coast, tanks had been landed already under a pretext.

    In Germany, Beetles were running off the production lines,as were pre war model Mercedeses, the Beetles already in 1945, I think.
    The British started production, contrary to the Morgenthau Plan, of killing ten million Germans through hunger, by removing all industry.
    As Churchill said to FDR 'I'm not going to be chained to a corpse'.

    At present the reverse, Brexit, Merkel has no intention to be chained to a corpse', whatever the Brussel bureaucrats want.

    The Marshall Plan did not rebuild Europe.

    True. While I can’t claim much expertise on that specific matter, the idea that most Americans seem to have been fed that it was some sort of mission of goodness and light is absurd as is the rest of the wartime propaganda which now poses as history.

    I suspect the plan was another way of scalping the dumb American goy working and middle classes to enrich the international bankster ones under Messianic pretenses.

    This is especially true in light of the fact that the USSR, the Zionists, and the banksters were the big winners of WW2 as well as the post war period.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • While the Trumpster is an idiot, so are ideas such as this.:

    But in so doing, he ignored the outstanding advantage of becoming part of a Pacific free-trade zone that excluded China…

    There is so much wrong with such a dippy idea, that a book could be written about it. The idea of excluding China isn’t even good in a short term economic sense or in any political sense beyond maybe some sappy nationalistic rhetoric.

    What part of “free” trade doesn’t the author understand? Yeah, I know that there never has been anything approaching free trade, but flagrant promotion of economic wars is about as worthless an idea as it gets. Same for sanctions against Iran and Russia for instance.

    What part of economic warfare is so hard to understand? Who benefits?

    Aaaaaarrrggghhh!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump’s campaign promise was to get along with Putin. Russia is now recovering from Communism and rediscovering its historic Christianity and anti-progressive values. Trump was forced to abandon his initial policy by the subversions of the neoconservative cabal. Every Christian must fight for détente with Russia and to block CIA and NATO subversions of Putin.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Good to see Unz publishing some globalist, interventionist nonsense as well, for diversity, though it’s hardly as though there’s a shortage of this stuff in the mainstream media. I suppose that’s the problem with publishing leftist supposedly dissident stuff like TomDispatch – leftists are inherently globalist and interventionist and so can be relied upon to ultimately subvert and let down any resistance to those trends.

    Dilip Hiro’s piece is quite inspiring though, and certainly renews my faith in my (non-voting, obviously) support for Trump in 2016. It’s notably simplistic to the point of being dishonest in parts, however. For instance:

    [Putin's] alliance with Assad had three dimensions: Syria’s historic links to the Soviet Union in the Cold War era; the Kremlin’s desire to have a naval facility in the Mediterranean after the loss of such a port in Libya when Muammar Gaddafi fell in 2011; and his doctrine that any group that takes up arms against an internationally recognized government is a terrorist organization.

    The first two points are legitimate, albeit their relative importance can be questioned. The third as stated is absurd and clearly selectively propagandist in intent.

    No mention of the likely real drivers of Russian intervention – concern to prevent another victory for islamist jihadism that would likely threaten Russia’s own muslim areas with further disorder, and concern to resist the US sphere’s advance and its “regime changing” of yet another country.

    The pointed omission of any reference to these clear motivations calls into question Hiro’s competence as an analyst of international affairs, and even his personal honesty.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrei Martyanov

    No mention of the likely real drivers of Russian intervention
     
    American pundits who pretend to know about outside world usually struggle mightily with the issue of causality. In their opinion the wind blows because trees are moving.
    , @Twodees Partain
    "The pointed omission of any reference to these clear motivations calls into question Hiro’s competence as an analyst of international affairs, and even his personal honesty."

    My sentiments exactly. What some editors view as valid in the writings of the "dissident left" is usually the use by leftists of certain components from their list of ideas that have been expressed by those who oppose their agenda, to get a reader to swallow items of the left's agenda.

    Hiro, and others at TD seem to imagine that they have managed to get the reader to nod along with them as they read his own words back to him, while they lead him to a conclusion that only a diseased mind could accept.

    It's foolish to accept any leftist as an ally. Leftists can never be true allies because they are, in the end, leftists.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Norumbega
    "China’s expansive almost-trillion-dollar One Belt One Road initiative, an infrastructure and transportation project meant to link the vast Eurasian landmass in a great economic web whose heart would lie in Beijing. (These days, the only trillion-dollar “initiatives” out of Washington involve building up its national security state, the military, and the nuclear arsenal further.) This was the sort of global project that once would have been a natural for the U.S. No longer." (Italics added.)

    When? Perhaps FDR's post-war intention to cooperatively develop the whole world, as described by his son, qualifies here, though the vision was never realized. The Marshall Plan did rebuild Europe, though its actual scale was on the order of 1/10 or less the Belt and Road Initiative in adjusted dollars. Kennedy's Alliance for Progress might also be invoked for comparison, though again dwarfed by BRI, and with little to show for it. But the fact is, even these episodes are exceptional. The italicized words above seem quite delusional when one considers the post Bretton Woods regime debt bondage and IMF conditionalities in the interests of Wall Street/City of London.

    The irony is that cooperation with China, toward which Trump (though opposed by the neocons within the Trump Administration) seems more favorably inclined than his predecessors, could be a key ingredient for financing Trump's own infrastructure promises, not to mention potential participation by US companies in BRI projects abroad. The $253 billion in memorandums of understanding signed during Trump's China visit in November (including $83.7 for West Virginia alone) are a promising beginning in this regard. Such beneficial cooperation in no way contradicts "America First" and actually offers a way forward, and away from the brink of confrontation between nuclear superpowers that the geopolitical view promotes as inevitable.

    The Marshall Plan did not rebuild Europe.
    I can vaguely remember 1948, the Netherlands had repaired most of the war damage.
    My father had been busy doing that from the liberation.
    I do remember when he took me to a Bailey bridge, as he said, that had replaced the old bridge, as said, ‘in de lucht laten vliegen’, by the Germans.
    In de lucht laten vliegen, literally ‘blown into the sky’.
    I looked up, and said ‘I do not see anything’.
    Anyhow, the Bailey bridge was replaced under my father’s supervision by a two lane concrete bridge.

    Marshall aid was given to prevent S and E European countrie from becoming communist.
    During the 1948 Italian election a large part of the USA fleet was anchored off the Italian coast, tanks had been landed already under a pretext.

    In Germany, Beetles were running off the production lines,as were pre war model Mercedeses, the Beetles already in 1945, I think.
    The British started production, contrary to the Morgenthau Plan, of killing ten million Germans through hunger, by removing all industry.
    As Churchill said to FDR ‘I’m not going to be chained to a corpse’.

    At present the reverse, Brexit, Merkel has no intention to be chained to a corpse’, whatever the Brussel bureaucrats want.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    The Marshall Plan did not rebuild Europe.
     
    True. While I can't claim much expertise on that specific matter, the idea that most Americans seem to have been fed that it was some sort of mission of goodness and light is absurd as is the rest of the wartime propaganda which now poses as history.

    I suspect the plan was another way of scalping the dumb American goy working and middle classes to enrich the international bankster ones under Messianic pretenses.

    This is especially true in light of the fact that the USSR, the Zionists, and the banksters were the big winners of WW2 as well as the post war period.

    , @jacques sheete
    Jyles, here's a quote and a link to a very good antidote to the myth that the Marshall Plan was intended to "save" Europe. It was a shakedown of the middle and working classes by the economic "elite" as usual.

    It's short and to the point.



    The actual legacy of the Marshall Plan was a vast expansion of government at home, the beginnings of the Cold War rhetoric that would sustain the welfare-warfare state for 40 years, a permanent global troop presence, and an entire business class on the take from Washington. It also created a belief on the part of the ruling elite in D.C. that it could trick the public into backing anything, including the idea that government and its connected interest groups should run the world at taxpayer expense.


    Tucker, Jeffrey A. "The Marshall Plan Myth." The Free Market 15, no. 9 (September 1997).

    https://mises.org/library/marshall-plan-myth
     
    , @Norumbega
    Thanks for the corrections and clarifications. Of course, my major point was that the things I could think of that might begin to compare with the current Chinese global development initiative are not in the same league, and that even these are not typical. (Contrary to Hiro, who had suggested that the Chinese initiative was the sort of thing the US had led pre-Trump.) Your corrections suggest Hiro was even more wrong than I thought.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Already in the thirties many in GB understood that GB could no longer afford its empire.
    Never anywhere saw a cost benefit analysis, cost, at the time, of Brittannia rules the waves, against benefits from colonial possessions, in particular India.
    Lawrence R. Pratt, ‘East of Malta, West of Suez’, London, 1975

    Never saw so clearly explained the British dilemma, they could not afford to control at the same time the Mediterranean, and the Far East.
    There was much talk about the bastion Singapore, so when it fell the British were shocked.
    They were also shocked when the battle ships Repulse and Prince of Wales were sunk by aircraft flown by little yellow men.
    As was the British navy, until then it was not believed that aircraft were a threat to battle ships.

    I wonder if the USA today is in the same position as the British inn the thirties.
    If the USA is, I hope it does not lead to desperate measures, as the British guarantees that unleashed WWII.

    Maybe the present USA government does have a cost benefit analysis, and concluded that the USA empire costs more than the benefits.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    Maybe the present USA government does have a cost benefit analysis, and concluded that the USA empire costs more than the benefits.
     
    British /American Imperial parallels are interesting, and it's true the British elite did pull back from Empire because the cost/benefit calculation changed after WWI - the cost became an impossible burden.

    The US is different, because the US elite isn't concerned about the national cost or the burden placed on the public. They've already proved this, by putting the public something like $ 6 Trillion in debt to pay for Middle East wars, with themselves and their MSM still pushing for more (Syria, Iran).

    US policy is dictated to Congress (and the administration) by an elite that is concerned with (in order of probable importance) 1) The Likud view of Israel's security - military and economic 2) continued MIC billion dollar special funding 3) Finance, Outsourcers & Globalists for the free flow of capital, goods and cheap labour.

    The aptly described "Grotesque" Hillary Clinton brought all this together as the Democratic candidate.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Beijing’s drive to have a footprint abroad and extend the OBOR concept beyond Eurasia, particularly to Africa, has been impressive. Between 1976 and 2016, for instance, China built five major railway lines in Africa, deploying 50,000 Chinese workers to complete the 1,150-mile Tanzania-Zambia Railway. Eight more rail projects are now underway.

    This has to be interesting. In the 19th Century it was the world’s dominant industrial producer, Great Britain, that was building infrastructure around the world to enable Imperial trade.

    In the 21st Century it’s the world’s dominant industrial producer , China, that is building infrastructure around the world to enable its (Imperial?) trade. China lacks the equivalent military power of the 19th Century British, but like the British it mostly wasn’t necessary. The British Empire grew out of trading posts and local trade agreements, joint projects etc.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal

    China lacks the equivalent military power of the 19th Century British, but like the British it mostly wasn’t necessary. The British Empire grew out of trading posts and local trade agreements, joint projects etc.
     
    I suppose the concern is that as the British global military dominion grew out of the need to protect far flung imperial possessions and profits, so the equivalent will come with the Chinese.

    Of course, the kind of military confrontation and containment policies advocated by some China hawks around the US regime will only make Chinese militarisation a certainty, and accelerate it dramatically.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Everybody can criticize Trump for something, but I’m impressed that the author choose to not only start with the TPP but also to provide such a nuanced justification for it (because apparently we’ll lose jobs either way, but TPP would have let us lose them to everybody BUT China. Nice).

    Following up with fawning over Macron was just the icing on the cake. I’m sure there was more to the article, but I’m sure the author will appreciate the logic of me making him stronger and more powerful by not reading the rest of it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Peacen1k
    Still don't understand the reason for Unz.com publishing establishment propaganda from TomDispatch. Arguing with these people is pointless and debunking this stuff for the umpteenth time is boring. Yawn.

    Where do you find the “establishment propaganda” in this? Are you imagining that an establishment consisting of traditional major party leaders and the big supporters they can call on has got an Indian or Indian American to do a job on Trump (pretending that the way wasn’t paved for him by the Democrats and Republicans he defeated)?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Peacen1k
    Still don't understand the reason for Unz.com publishing establishment propaganda from TomDispatch. Arguing with these people is pointless and debunking this stuff for the umpteenth time is boring. Yawn.

    establishment propaganda from TomDispatch.

    Oxymorons will get you no where.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • STFU, Dilip. You and every other commie at TD can kiss my ass.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JustJeff
    Low effort boomerpost 0/10
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Peacen1k
    Still don't understand the reason for Unz.com publishing establishment propaganda from TomDispatch. Arguing with these people is pointless and debunking this stuff for the umpteenth time is boring. Yawn.

    Agree.

    But let’s rant a little bit. Let’s take one example from the article:
    America… “in its urge to build walls of every kind and shut so many people out”

    I am not American, but I do know that the US has the highest immigration rate in the world (when combining legal and illegal immigration). But that understates what is going on. US is undertaking one of the most rapid, and comprehensive demographic transformations the world has never seen. It is literally replacing its native population with such viciousness and carelessness that it completely escapes any rational analysis.

    And yet the people still get:
    “in its urge to build walls of every kind and shut so many people out”

    How do these people square the circles in their heads all the time? I mean, I know some of them are dollar store propagandists. But not all of them. Some of them actually believe. Scary.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JerseyJeffersonian
    Look at his name. Dilip Hiro. Wonder no longer about why he is on the Immivasion Bandwagon.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “China’s expansive almost-trillion-dollar One Belt One Road initiative, an infrastructure and transportation project meant to link the vast Eurasian landmass in a great economic web whose heart would lie in Beijing. (These days, the only trillion-dollar “initiatives” out of Washington involve building up its national security state, the military, and the nuclear arsenal further.) This was the sort of global project that once would have been a natural for the U.S. No longer.” (Italics added.)

    When? Perhaps FDR’s post-war intention to cooperatively develop the whole world, as described by his son, qualifies here, though the vision was never realized. The Marshall Plan did rebuild Europe, though its actual scale was on the order of 1/10 or less the Belt and Road Initiative in adjusted dollars. Kennedy’s Alliance for Progress might also be invoked for comparison, though again dwarfed by BRI, and with little to show for it. But the fact is, even these episodes are exceptional. The italicized words above seem quite delusional when one considers the post Bretton Woods regime debt bondage and IMF conditionalities in the interests of Wall Street/City of London.

    The irony is that cooperation with China, toward which Trump (though opposed by the neocons within the Trump Administration) seems more favorably inclined than his predecessors, could be a key ingredient for financing Trump’s own infrastructure promises, not to mention potential participation by US companies in BRI projects abroad. The $253 billion in memorandums of understanding signed during Trump’s China visit in November (including $83.7 for West Virginia alone) are a promising beginning in this regard. Such beneficial cooperation in no way contradicts “America First” and actually offers a way forward, and away from the brink of confrontation between nuclear superpowers that the geopolitical view promotes as inevitable.

    Read More
    • Agree: fnn
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    The Marshall Plan did not rebuild Europe.
    I can vaguely remember 1948, the Netherlands had repaired most of the war damage.
    My father had been busy doing that from the liberation.
    I do remember when he took me to a Bailey bridge, as he said, that had replaced the old bridge, as said, 'in de lucht laten vliegen', by the Germans.
    In de lucht laten vliegen, literally 'blown into the sky'.
    I looked up, and said 'I do not see anything'.
    Anyhow, the Bailey bridge was replaced under my father's supervision by a two lane concrete bridge.

    Marshall aid was given to prevent S and E European countrie from becoming communist.
    During the 1948 Italian election a large part of the USA fleet was anchored off the Italian coast, tanks had been landed already under a pretext.

    In Germany, Beetles were running off the production lines,as were pre war model Mercedeses, the Beetles already in 1945, I think.
    The British started production, contrary to the Morgenthau Plan, of killing ten million Germans through hunger, by removing all industry.
    As Churchill said to FDR 'I'm not going to be chained to a corpse'.

    At present the reverse, Brexit, Merkel has no intention to be chained to a corpse', whatever the Brussel bureaucrats want.
    , @MEFOBILLS
    "China" could be a key ingredient for financing Trump’s own infrastructure promises,

    A sovereign issuer of currency does not need to borrow foreign capital. If your country produces steel, electricity, all the minerals needed, and has an educated workforce, then all the ingredients are present. A sovereign can then issue money to do the projects.

    While bank corporations do run the U.S. it is only by way of fraud. During wartime, monetary fraud is shoved aside. For example, U.S. spent debt free using line item budget authority during WW2. This line item money funneled through reconstruction finance corporation, to then build out aviation, synthetic rubber, and aluminum smelting. The companies created were sold to American's for $1.

    It is preposterous to think the U.S. needs Chinese money.

    China has about five large state banks, and these banks emit Yuans in the form of loans. These state entities also forgive said loans, effectively making their Yuan bank credit debt free. China has issued trillions of Yuans this way.

    So, this notion of importing formerly debt free issued Yuans to then produce in America is ignorant in the extreme.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • TPP? Globalist garbage putting corporations in charge of governance. Good riddance to it!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Still don’t understand the reason for Unz.com publishing establishment propaganda from TomDispatch. Arguing with these people is pointless and debunking this stuff for the umpteenth time is boring. Yawn.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hmmm
    Agree.

    But let's rant a little bit. Let's take one example from the article:
    America... "in its urge to build walls of every kind and shut so many people out"

    I am not American, but I do know that the US has the highest immigration rate in the world (when combining legal and illegal immigration). But that understates what is going on. US is undertaking one of the most rapid, and comprehensive demographic transformations the world has never seen. It is literally replacing its native population with such viciousness and carelessness that it completely escapes any rational analysis.

    And yet the people still get:
    "in its urge to build walls of every kind and shut so many people out"

    How do these people square the circles in their heads all the time? I mean, I know some of them are dollar store propagandists. But not all of them. Some of them actually believe. Scary.
    , @Biff

    establishment propaganda from TomDispatch.
     
    Oxymorons will get you no where.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    Where do you find the "establishment propaganda" in this? Are you imagining that an establishment consisting of traditional major party leaders and the big supporters they can call on has got an Indian or Indian American to do a job on Trump (pretending that the way wasn't paved for him by the Democrats and Republicans he defeated)?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In the strangest election year in recent American history -- one in which the Libertarian Party’s Gary Johnson couldn’t even conjure up the name of a foreign leader he “admired” while Donald Trump remained intent on building his “fat, beautiful wall” and “taking” Iraq oil -- the world may be out of focus for many...
  • It’s getting pretty clear by now that where Russians lose in terms of their GDP, they more than compensate for by the sheer brainpower. Russia is ruled by the undisputed geopolitical genius, while the West is headed toward a brick wall by a bunch of pathetic clowns (not even scary ones). The outcome therefore is sadly predictable.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Undoubtedly, for nearly two decades, the most dangerous place on Earth has been the Indian-Pakistani border in Kashmir. It’s possible that a small spark from artillery and rocket exchanges across that border might -- given the known military doctrines of the two nuclear-armed neighbors -- lead inexorably to an all-out nuclear conflagration. In that case...
  • And the neocon crazies want us to believe Iran is a nuclear threat to world peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • India’s policymakers went on to commit themselves to upgrade the country’s nuclear arms program with a new generation of more powerful hydrogen bombs designed to be city-busters.

    While your subversion & cuckoldery is interesting, let’s address it directly christian.

    1. India has moratorium on nuke testing
    2. Pakistan has changed demographics of Kashmir
    3. Demilitarization is pretext for plebiscite
    4. Of course India does not want Us to have control over Hindu Nukes

    You’re a sold out christian shill but w/e
    Sikhs will deal with you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Call it an irony, if you will, but as the Obama administration struggles to slow down or halt its scheduled withdrawal from Afghanistan, newly elected Afghan President Ashraf Ghani is performing a withdrawal operation of his own. He seems to be in the process of trying to sideline the country’s major patron of the last...
  • The game has moved. Now it is the Great Game in Iran and they’ll lock up all the sports writers and journalists except for state media that’s full of crap.

    You know it’s safer
    Breakout!

    Tonight there’s gonna be a breakout
    Into the city zones
    Don’t you dare to try and stop us
    No one could for long

    Searchlight on my trail
    Tonight’s the night, all systems fail
    Hey you, good lookin’ female
    Come here

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @MarkinLA
    I submit that when the odds were close to being even the US got the crap kicked out of them in WWII.

    Not really. The Germans had the advantage of superior equipment the Japanese did not and did far worse compared to US forces. However, I thought the object of war is to always maneuver your forces so that your are in a superior position either by strength of numbers, terrain, or intelligence so this comment doesn't make much sense.

    Germans may have had superior quality war materiel but USA had a whole lot more of it.

    That’s what the labor camps were all about: Germany had to find a way to produce war machines that Allies could not bomb, with a labor force to replace the German civilians who had been killed or “de-housed” by Allied firebombing.

    well before war became hot, USA & Britain adopted the strategy to use air power to destroy a. civilian, especially working-class morale and b. military production facilities.

    In the latter they were successful.

    USA’s greatest contribution to WWII was the “arsenal of democracy” (sic) — US war manufacturing proceeded without threat or destruction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Isn’t Rockefeller Foundation one of Parsi/NIAC’s major supporters?

    Hooshang Ahmirimadi’s organization, American Iranian Council (AIC) http://hosted.verticalresponse.com/1704073/30a2b0a55e/543984403/14ab06b5fa/

    seems to offer principled advocacy for Iran in the USA.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Ghani is a US Citizen. According to Afghanistan constitution the ‘leader’ of the country CANNOT BE A FOREIGNER. He has denied his Afghani citizenship when he assumes American citizenship. Apparently, US police state through war and chaos will install a puppet in every colony to serves US empire NOT Afghani people. CIA is trying to do the same in Iran and brings CIA asset such as Trita Parsi, a GREEN supporter and a CIA/Jstreet stooge, to power, but they cannot do it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • […] Afghanistan and its neighbors “In the new foreign policy that Ghani recently outlined, the United States finds itself consigned to the third of the five circles of importance. The first circle contains neighboring countries, including China with its common border with Afghanistan, and the second is restricted to the countries of the Islamic world. […]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I submit that when the odds were close to being even the US got the crap kicked out of them in WWII.

    Not really. The Germans had the advantage of superior equipment the Japanese did not and did far worse compared to US forces. However, I thought the object of war is to always maneuver your forces so that your are in a superior position either by strength of numbers, terrain, or intelligence so this comment doesn’t make much sense.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    Germans may have had superior quality war materiel but USA had a whole lot more of it.

    That's what the labor camps were all about: Germany had to find a way to produce war machines that Allies could not bomb, with a labor force to replace the German civilians who had been killed or "de-housed" by Allied firebombing.

    well before war became hot, USA & Britain adopted the strategy to use air power to destroy a. civilian, especially working-class morale and b. military production facilities.

    In the latter they were successful.


    USA's greatest contribution to WWII was the "arsenal of democracy" (sic) -- US war manufacturing proceeded without threat or destruction.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Wally [AKA "BobbyBeGood"] says: • Website
    @Renoman
    America has been getting the crap kicked out of itself since WW2 and haven't learned a thing.

    “America has been getting the crap kicked out of itself since WW2 and haven’t learned a thing.”

    I submit that when the odds were close to being even the US got the crap kicked out of them in WWII.

    Nonetheless, watching TV commercials for the military and their begging for suckers to ‘join greatest team’ flies in the face of the fact that in operation after operation the US military has been beaten.

    Well, perhaps mighty Grenada could be considered a ‘win’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • America has been getting the crap kicked out of itself since WW2 and haven’t learned a thing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    "America has been getting the crap kicked out of itself since WW2 and haven’t learned a thing."

    I submit that when the odds were close to being even the US got the crap kicked out of them in WWII.

    Nonetheless, watching TV commercials for the military and their begging for suckers to 'join greatest team' flies in the face of the fact that in operation after operation the US military has been beaten.

    Well, perhaps mighty Grenada could be considered a 'win'.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @solontoCroesus
    Don Nash --

    When G H W Bush invaded Iraq in 1990-91, he was motivated to re-enact US "victory" in WWII.

    As Pat Buchanan has argued, that was an unnecessary war.

    As Irving Kristol has said, FDR involved US in war against Germany "based on lies and manipulation."

    The American people have been saturated with the belief that that was a "good war" that was fought by "the greatest generation" whose courageous behavior produced "victory."

    The facts are Germany posed no real threat to USA.

    According to E Hughes, Allied firebombing of civilians in WWII was the first use of WMD to terrorize a civilian population, a crime against humanity. The major campaigns waged by Allies were firebombing campaigns that deliberately targeted civilians.

    The Russians "won" the war; for their pains FDR had bargained to them the rape of Germany and the occupation of Poland.

    That is the model G H W Bush employed in the opening salvo of US imperial conquest of the Middle East -- the Persian Gulf war.

    In contrast, earlier, Nixon went to China. The China model.

    How ironic that while the US (and Israel -- zionists were lead partners in both US wars in Europe and were intimately involved in the 'softening up' phase -- economic warfare and the attendant starvation and devastation of civilian populations; and zionists were intimately involved in the architecture of the stunning destruction of civilians and infrastructure as a goal. The ideological concept is that of creative destruction, otherwise known as the Abrahamic model: recall that Abraham's first public act was the destruction of the icons of all other peoples save his own.

    This is something to think about as Passover -- when the angel of death slaughtered the children of Egyptians but passed over the homes of Hebrews -- coincides with the crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus -- and also, a total lunar eclipse.

    Nixon did not destroy China in order to promote US interests with China. He talked, and he traded.

    (China is not part of the Abrahamic tradition.)

    That's just what China is doing now in Afghanistan, talking and trading, as Hiro detailed.

    Meanwhile, the heirs of Abraham are ramrodding about the world seeking whom to kill and destroy.

    “As Pat Buchanan has argued, that was an unnecessary war.”

    As was Korea and Vietnam.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Don Nash
    The US will end up being a footnote in history for being staggeringly arrogant and woefully dangerous.

    Don Nash —

    When G H W Bush invaded Iraq in 1990-91, he was motivated to re-enact US “victory” in WWII.

    As Pat Buchanan has argued, that was an unnecessary war.

    As Irving Kristol has said, FDR involved US in war against Germany “based on lies and manipulation.”

    The American people have been saturated with the belief that that was a “good war” that was fought by “the greatest generation” whose courageous behavior produced “victory.”

    The facts are Germany posed no real threat to USA.

    According to E Hughes, Allied firebombing of civilians in WWII was the first use of WMD to terrorize a civilian population, a crime against humanity. The major campaigns waged by Allies were firebombing campaigns that deliberately targeted civilians.

    The Russians “won” the war; for their pains FDR had bargained to them the rape of Germany and the occupation of Poland.

    That is the model G H W Bush employed in the opening salvo of US imperial conquest of the Middle East — the Persian Gulf war.

    In contrast, earlier, Nixon went to China. The China model.

    How ironic that while the US (and Israel — zionists were lead partners in both US wars in Europe and were intimately involved in the ‘softening up’ phase — economic warfare and the attendant starvation and devastation of civilian populations; and zionists were intimately involved in the architecture of the stunning destruction of civilians and infrastructure as a goal. The ideological concept is that of creative destruction, otherwise known as the Abrahamic model: recall that Abraham’s first public act was the destruction of the icons of all other peoples save his own.

    This is something to think about as Passover — when the angel of death slaughtered the children of Egyptians but passed over the homes of Hebrews — coincides with the crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus — and also, a total lunar eclipse.

    Nixon did not destroy China in order to promote US interests with China. He talked, and he traded.

    (China is not part of the Abrahamic tradition.)

    That’s just what China is doing now in Afghanistan, talking and trading, as Hiro detailed.

    Meanwhile, the heirs of Abraham are ramrodding about the world seeking whom to kill and destroy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist
    "As Pat Buchanan has argued, that was an unnecessary war."

    As was Korea and Vietnam.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In this way, Ghani seems to be creating an environment conducive to the holding of formal peace talks with the Taliban later this year. <<<<>>>> If so, a new chapter could unfold in war-torn Afghanistan in which the Chinese role would only grow, while the United States might end up as a footnote in the long history of that country.

    How does it necessarily follow that formal peace talks with Afghanistan means an enhanced role for China but not USA?

    — I get it that US use of contractors & NGOs led to corruption — change that: didn’t LEAD to corruption, the corruption was baked in; that was the goal all along.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The US will end up being a footnote in history for being staggeringly arrogant and woefully dangerous.

    Read More
    • Replies: @solontoCroesus
    Don Nash --

    When G H W Bush invaded Iraq in 1990-91, he was motivated to re-enact US "victory" in WWII.

    As Pat Buchanan has argued, that was an unnecessary war.

    As Irving Kristol has said, FDR involved US in war against Germany "based on lies and manipulation."

    The American people have been saturated with the belief that that was a "good war" that was fought by "the greatest generation" whose courageous behavior produced "victory."

    The facts are Germany posed no real threat to USA.

    According to E Hughes, Allied firebombing of civilians in WWII was the first use of WMD to terrorize a civilian population, a crime against humanity. The major campaigns waged by Allies were firebombing campaigns that deliberately targeted civilians.

    The Russians "won" the war; for their pains FDR had bargained to them the rape of Germany and the occupation of Poland.

    That is the model G H W Bush employed in the opening salvo of US imperial conquest of the Middle East -- the Persian Gulf war.

    In contrast, earlier, Nixon went to China. The China model.

    How ironic that while the US (and Israel -- zionists were lead partners in both US wars in Europe and were intimately involved in the 'softening up' phase -- economic warfare and the attendant starvation and devastation of civilian populations; and zionists were intimately involved in the architecture of the stunning destruction of civilians and infrastructure as a goal. The ideological concept is that of creative destruction, otherwise known as the Abrahamic model: recall that Abraham's first public act was the destruction of the icons of all other peoples save his own.

    This is something to think about as Passover -- when the angel of death slaughtered the children of Egyptians but passed over the homes of Hebrews -- coincides with the crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus -- and also, a total lunar eclipse.

    Nixon did not destroy China in order to promote US interests with China. He talked, and he traded.

    (China is not part of the Abrahamic tradition.)

    That's just what China is doing now in Afghanistan, talking and trading, as Hiro detailed.

    Meanwhile, the heirs of Abraham are ramrodding about the world seeking whom to kill and destroy.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.