The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Anatoly Karlin Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Forum Fred Reed Agnostic DavidB P-ter Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson JayMan John Derbyshire Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Razib Khan Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski Steve Sailer The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Ben Freeman Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew C.J. Hopkins Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jared Taylor Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Pilger John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Rothrock Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election Alt Right American Media American Military Anti-Semitism Blacks Books China Conspiracy Theories Crime Culture Donald Trump Economics Education Foreign Policy Genetics Hillary Clinton History Human Biodiversity Ideology Illegal Immigration Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Miscellaneous Movies Neocons Obama Open Thread Political Correctness Political Economy Politics Race/Ethnicity Real Estate Russia Science Sports Syria Terrorism Ukraine 2008 Election 2010 Census 2012 Election 2012 US Elections 23andMe 9/11 A Farewell To Alms A Song Of Ice And Fire A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Academia Access Journalism Acheivement Gap Achievement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Adaptation Addiction Admin Administration ADMIXTOOLS Admixture Adoptees Adoption AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Aging Agriculture AIDS Ainu AIPAC Aircraft Carriers Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexei Kudrin Alexei Navalny Algeria Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com American Atheists American Exceptionalism American History American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Pravda American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Anti-Gentilism Anti-Vaccination Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Apartheid Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Architecture Arctic Resources Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Arkham's Razor Armenia Army Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Ask A ScienceBlogger ASPM Assange Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attila The Hun Attractive Nuisance Doctrine Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Asiatic Austro-Hungarian Empire authoritarianism Autism Automation Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Azerbaijan Babes And Hunks Babri Masjid Baby Gap Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Poetry Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltics Baltimore Riots Banana Republicans Bangladesh Bangladeshis Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Barbarians Barone Baseball Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables Basque Baumeister BDS Movement Beauty Behavior Genetics Behavioral Economics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Ben Cardin Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Benjamin Netanyahu Berezovsky Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders #BernieSoWhite Beta Males BICOM Big History BigPost Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Biodiversity Bioethics Biology Birth Order Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims #BlackJobsMatter #BlackLiesMurder Blade Runner Blog Blogging Blond Hair Blondism Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology boats-in-the-water bodybuilding Boers Bolshevik Revolution Border Security Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brahmans Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brainwash Brazil Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brezhnev Brian Boutwell BRICs Brighter Brains Britain Burakumin Burma Bush Bush Administration Business Cagots California Californication Cambodia Cameron Russell Camp Of The Saints Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada #Cancel2022WorldCupinQatar Cancer Candida Albicans Capitalism Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carlos Slim Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catfight Catholic Church Catholicism Caucasus Cavaliers Cecil Rhodes Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Chetty Chicagoization Child Labor Children China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Economy Chinese Evolution Chinese History Chinese IQ Chinese Language Chinese People Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Stringer Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Circumcision Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilization CJIA Clannishness Clans Class Classical History Climate Climate Change Clinton Cliodynamics Clovis clusterfake Coal Coalition Coalition Of The Fringes Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cognitive Science Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission Colonialism Color Revolution Columba Bush Comments Communism Community Reinvestment Act Compton Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Conquistador-American Consanguinity Consequences Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Convergence Core Article Cornel West Corruption Corruption Perception Index Corruption Perceptions Index Cousin Marriage Cover Story Creationism CRIF Crimea Crimean Tatars Crimethink Crisis Crispr Crops crops-rotting-in-the-fields Cruise Missiles Crying Among The Farmland Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuckold Envy Cuckoldry Cuckservative Cultural Anthropology Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dana Milbank Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Darwinism Data Data Analysis Data Posts David Foster Wallace David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Kramer David Lane David Moser David Petraeus Davide Piffer De Ploribus Unum Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire Deep Sleep Deep South Deep State Demic Diffusion Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Justice Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Detroit Development Developmental Noise Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dick Cheney Dienekes Diet Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination discussion Disease Disney Disparate Impact Displaced And Refugees Dissent Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Dmitry Medvedev DNA Dodecad Dogs Dollar Donme Dopamine Down Syndrome Dr James Thompson Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Drone War Drones Drought Drugs DSM DTC Personal Genomics Duterte Dylan Roof Dynasty Dysgenic E-books E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians Eastern Europe Ebola Ecology Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economic Theory Economy Ed Miller Edward Gibbon Edward Price Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Efraim Diveroli Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Eisenhower Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy Energy England Enhanced Interrogations Environment Environmentalism Epigenetics Epistemology Erdogan EROEI Espionage Estonia Estrogen Ethics Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Genomics European History European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Genomics Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News fallout False Flag Attack Family Family Matters Fantasy Far Abroad Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Shaming FBI FDA Federal Reserve Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response FEMEN Feminism Feminists Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Feuds Fiction Fields Medals FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland Finn Baiting Finnish Content First Amendment First World War FISA Fitness Flight From White Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football Forecasts Foreign Policy Foreign Service Fracking France Francis Gary Powers Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Freakonomics Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Canadians French Paradox Friday Fluff Friendly & Conventional Front National Frontlash Funny Futurism Gaddafi Game Game Of Nations Game Of Thrones Gangs Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gemayel Clan Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gender Relations Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Social Survey Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic History Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George R. R. Martin George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Gina Haspel Gladwell Glenn Beck Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization GMO God Delusion Golf Google Google Data Explorer Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Graphs GRE Great Leap Forward #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greeks Green Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection GSS Guangzhou Guardian Guardian Censorship Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gypsies H-1B H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Half Sigma Halloween Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule HammerHate Hanzi Happiness Harappa Ancestry Project Harriet Tubman Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara hate Hate Crimes hate-fraud hate-hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech HateStat Havelock Ellis Hbd Hbd Chick Hbd Fallout HBDchick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heather Norton Hegira Height Height Privilege Helmuth Nyborg Henry Harpending Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah Himachal Pradesh Hindu Caste System Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Hist kai Historical Genetics Historical Population Genetics Hitler Hodgepodge Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate homicides Homophobia Homosexuality Houellebecq House Intelligence Committee Housing Hox Hoxby HplusNRx Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Hug Thug Human Achievement human-capital Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genome Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Variation Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hybridization Hypocrisy Hypodescent I Love Italians I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan Ibn Khaldun Ibo Ice T Iceland Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Igor Strelkov Ilana Mercer IMF immigrants Immigration immigration-policy-terminology Immigriping Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Incest Income India India Genetics Indian Economy Indian Genetics Indian Genomics Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-European Indo-Europeans Indonesia industrialization Inequality Infection Theory Inflation Infrastructure inosmi Intellectuals Intelligence International Affairs International Comparisons International Relations Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Interracial Marriage Intersectionality Interviews Introgression Inuit Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Invasive Species Ioannis Metaxas Iosef Stalin Iosif Lazaridis Iosif Stalin Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Is It Good For The Jews? Is Love Colorblind ISIS. Terrorism Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamist-liberal Alliance Islamophobia Islamophobiaphobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying IT Italy J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Mattis James Watson James Wooley Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. JCPOA ¡Jeb! Jeb Bush Jeffrey Shuren Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Kasich John Kerry John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Michael Greer John Tooby John Updike Jonathan Pollard Joseph McCarthy Journalism Judaism Judge George Daniels Judicial System Judith Harris Julia Ioffe Kaboom Kalash Katz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kenneth Pomeranz Kennewick Man Kerry Killinger Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson Kids These Days Kim Jong Un Kin Selection Kindle Kinship Kissing Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kremlin Clans Ksenia Sobchak Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell LA Lady Gaga Lame Jesse Jackson Imitations Lame News Language Languages Larry Summers Las Vegas Massacre Late Obama Age Collapse Late Ov Latin America Latinos Latvia Law Law Of Supply And Demand Law Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lazy Glossophiliac Lead Poisoning Learning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left/Right Lenin Lesbians Lèse-diversité LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberal Opposition Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Linguistics Links Literacy Literature Litvinenko Living Standards Lloyd Blankfein Logan's Run Loooong Books Looting Lorde Love Dolls Lover Boys Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. Machiavellianism Mad Men Madeleine Albright Madoff Magritte Mahmoud Abbas Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Malnutrition Malthusianism Manor Manorialism Manspreading Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marcomentum! Marijuana Marine Le Pen mark-adomanis Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marketing Major Postmodernism Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Barghouti Marxism Masculinity Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Math Mathematics Matthew Weiner Max Blumenthal Max Boot Mayans McCain McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Media Medicine Medvedev Mega-Aggressions Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanesians Melanin Memorial Day Men With Gold Chains Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Mesolithic Mexican-American War Mexican Mediocrity Mexico Michael Anton Michael Flynn Michael Jackson Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michelle Bachmann Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarization Military Military Analysis Military History Military Spending Military Technology Milner Group Minimum Wage Minorities Mirror Neurons Misdreavus Missile Defense Missing The Point Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Model Minority Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moore's Law Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Moxie Moynihan's Law Of The Canadian Border Mozilo MTDNA Mulatto Elite Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Multiregionalism Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai Myanmar NAEP NAMs Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Natalism National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Immigration Safety And Quality Board National Question National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture navalny Naz Shah Nazi Nazism Nbc News Neandertal Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Ned Flanders Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neolithic Revolution Neoreaction Nerds Netherlands Neuroscience New Atheists New Cold War New France New Rules New Silk Road New World New World Order New York New York City New York Times News Neymar Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nieto Nigeria Night In The Museum Nikki Haley NIMBY Nobel Prize Nobel Prized #NobelsSoWhiteMale Nordics North Africa North Korea Northwest Europe Norway #NotOkay Novorossiya Sitrep NSA Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nurture Assumption Nutrition O Mio Babbino Caro Obamacare Obamanomics Obesity Obey Giant! Obituary Obscured American Occam's Butterknife Occam's Razor Occam's Rubber Room Occupy Oil Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders Operational Sex Ratio Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orissa Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden Out-of-Africa Out Of Africa Model Out Of African Outbreeding Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Paleoamerindians Paleoanthropology Paleolibertarianism Paleolithic Paleolithic Europeans Paleontology Palestine Palestinians Palin Pamela Geller Panama Papers Panhandling Paper Review Parasite Manipulation Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Parsi Partly Inbred Extended Family Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Pax Americana Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Perception Management Personal Personal Genomics Personality Peter Frost Peter Turchin P&G Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Philosophy Philosophy Of Science Phylogenetics Pigmentation Pigs Piketty Pioneer Hypothesis PISA Pizzagate Planned Parenthood Poetry Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Philosophy Politicians Polls Polygamy Polygenic Score Polygyny Poor Reading Skills Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Population Structure Population Substructure Populism Porn Pornography Portugal Post 201 Post-Modernism Post-Nationalism Poverty PRC Prediction Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Prester John Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Productivity Profiling Progressives Projection Pronoun Crisis Propaganda Prostitution Protectionism protest Protestantism Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome Putinsliv Pygmies Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec R. A. Fisher Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ race-realism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Profiling Racial Reality Racism Racist Objects Menace Racist Pumpkin Incident Radical Islam Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Raqqa Rationality Razib Khan R&D Reader Survey Reading RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red State Blue State Red States Blue States redlining Redneck Dunkirk Refugee Boy Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome #RefugeesWelcomeInQatar Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Replication Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Party Republicans Responsibility Retconning Reuel Gerecht Review Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Russell Rick Perry RIP rise-of-the-rest Ritholtz Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roger Ailes Rohingya Rolling Stone Roman Empire Rome Romney Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Ross Perot Rotherham Rove Roy Moore RT International Rushton Russell Kirk Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Economy Russian Elections 2018 Russian Far East Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Politics Russian Reaction Russian Society Russian Spies Russophobes Ruth Benedict Saakashvili sabermetrics Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Sammy Sosa San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf Sarah Palin Sarin Gas SAT Satoshi Kanazawa Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Schizophrenia School Science Denialism Science Fiction Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Select Select Post Selection Self-obsession Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sergey Brin Sex Sex Differences Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Sibel Edmonds Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Mothers Single Women Six Day War SJWs Skin Color Skin Tone Skunk Works Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Smart Fraction Smoking Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Solzhenitsyn Songun Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South Asian Genetics South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet History Soviet Union Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain SPLC Sport Sputnik News Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Comparisons State Department State Formation States Rights Statistics Statue Of Liberty Statue Of Libertyism Statute Of Diversity Statute Of Immigration Statute Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Pinker Steven Spielberg Steve's Rice Thresher Columns Still Not Free Buddy Strategic Affairs Ministry Student Loans Stuff White People Like Stuxnet Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Submission Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subrealism Suicide Supercomputers Superintelligence Supreme Court Survey Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Syed Farook syr Syrian Civil War Syriza T.S. Eliot Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tajikistan Taki Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev Tamil Nadu Tashfeen Malik Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Television Terrorists Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas Thailand The AK The Bell Curve The Better Angels Of Our Nature The Bible The Black Autumn The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Deep South The Economist The Eight Banditos The Future The Gap The Golfocaust The Kissing Billionaire The Left The Lobby The Megaphone The New York Times The Saker The Scramble For America The Son Also Rises The South The Washington Post The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Thermoeconomics Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Jefferson Thomas Perez Thomas Talhelm Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Tiger Woods TIMSS TNC Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Hanks Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transsexuals Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling Tropical Humans Trudeau True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tsarnaev Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twintuition Twitter UK UKIP Ukrainian Crisis Unanswerable Questions Unbearable Whiteness Underperformin' Norman Mineta Unemployment Union Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universal Basic Income Universalism unwordly Upper Paleolithic Urbanization US Blacks US Civil War II US Elections 2016 US-Russia.org Expert Discussion Panel USA Used Car Dealers Moral Superiority Of USS Liberty Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaccination Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Variation Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victor Canfield Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Violence Vioxx Virginia Tech Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Vladimir Putin Vladimir Zhirinovsky Voronezh Vote Fraud Vulcan Society W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wall Street War War In Donbass War On Terror Warhol Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watson Watsoning Waugh Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Westerns Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Death White Helmets White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy Whites Who Is The Fairest Of Them All? Who Whom Why We Can't Have Nice Things Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class World Cup World Values Survey World War G World War I World War II World War III World War T Wretched Refuse Wretched Refuseism Writing WSJ WTO WVS Xi Jinping Y Chromosome Yamnaya Yankees Yemen Yezidis Yochi Dreazen You Maniacs You Blew It Up Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies
Nothing found
"Mark Presco"
Comments
• My
Comments
107 Comments • 16,800 Words •  RSS
(Commenters may request that their archives be hidden by contacting the appropriate blogger)
All Comments
 All Comments
    Recently, I reported that Leftist journalist-enforcers had discovered an annual academic conference on subjects like genetic racial differences in intelligence had taken place, almost clandestinely, at the prestigious University College of London for four years without the SJW mob or even the university knowing about it. The usual moral panic ensued. James Thompson, the lecturer...
  • @Mulegino1

    The Greeks, Romans and all other primitive cultures did exactly the same thing. They have been proven wrong. Do you believe in their Gods? Why do you believe that the very recent Jewish god is the one true god. And by the way you now have a pantheon of 3 gods.
     
    I would hardly characterize the Greeks and Romans as "primitive cultures." By the time of Socrates, the Greek gods- or rather their concept of the gods- had degenerated to the point of an anthropomorphic and purely exoteric popular religiosity. The Roman cult, which avoided the anthropomorphic conception of the gods more so than the Greeks, had become for the most part a formalized and empty ceremonial ritual. However, during this period many aspects of the ancient primordial Tradition or revelation had been preserved in the mystery cults, such as those of Eleusis.

    One can observe such a cycle in most of the great spiritual traditions, even in Christianity, which has degenerated in this manner ever since the Renaissance period, evinced by the iconography and architecture of the period. The Gothic was a magnificent expression of the Medieval synthesis with its emphasis upon the transcendence and infinity of the Supreme Being and the celestial realm, while the Renaissance art and architecture, however magnificent, became more and more earth oriented and anthropomorphic. The changes reflected in art and architecture reflected the increasing descent of spirituality from contemplative to active, from esoteric to exoteric.

    I have stated my desire to bridge the gap between science and religion. What do you think of the Catholic priests effort to do the same by proposing the omega point?



     

    Are you referring to Teilhard de Chardin, the famous Jesuit paleontologist?

    You really didn’t answer any of my questions, but I agree with what you said. All of the problems you stated is in my opinion caused by basing your beliefs on metaphysics. In the end people just believe what they want to believe.

    Post-modernism argues that humans can neither perceive nor understand reality. They have a point. So they conclude that this same mind should dictate reality. Absurd, it’s all about feelings.

    Hence, the scientific method. Nothing should be accepted as real unless validated by the universe we exist in. An idea or concept by the human mind is called a hypothesis. When validated by peer review using the scientific method it is called a theory. Scientists never conclude they have the final answer.

    They best way to do this is to devise an experiment which proves your theory. If the outcome of the experiment is as you predicted then your theory is validated.

    You have to understand how profound this is. For the first time in human history, humans can accurately and reliably predict the future. I would place this at Newton’s time. Newton’s laws of motion can accurately predict where any heavily body will be at any time in the future. This is why I call previous cultures “primitive”.

    As the scientific method was being applied to everything on this planet, it began to contradict religious dogma based on metaphysics. The earth is much older than 6000 years, all animals weren’t created perfectly 6000 years ago, etc. So here we are.

    Many of you Christians can’t accept this because it undermines your desire to live forever. You have zero evidence that there is an afterlife just as you have zero evidence that there is a god, but you need to believe it. You are terrified of your own mortality.

    I can offer some comfort. We have a kind of immortality here on earth. Each of us, every living thing, is over 3.5 billion years old. Our true soul, our true selves are our genes. These genes are passed from body to body in a continuous existence that reaches all the way back to the beginning of life on this planet. Every 20 years or so we are renewed.

    However, those thoughts and memories stored in our brains will cease to exist. I am at the end of my life and this depresses the hell out me. A better word might be emptiness. But I will not live a lie. I will have to be content with being part of the journey.

    So there is a need to bridge the gap between science and religion. Religion had insights into the human condition, contributed to science and provided solace in a harsh world. I really appreciate Teilhard’s effort, but as I wrote in an earlier comment, promote a less spiritual approach to his theory.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_Point

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1

    As the scientific method was being applied to everything on this planet, it began to contradict religious dogma based on metaphysics. The earth is much older than 6000 years, all animals weren’t created perfectly 6000 years ago, etc. So here we are.
     
    The age of the earth according to an interpretation of the Bible is a question related to history, and has nothing to do with metaphysics or natural theology. You are confusing Bible History with the latter two disciplines.

    Metaphysics is, in its purest form, the study of Being and causality, primarily as they relate to contingent being and contingent beings. The modern scientistic (it is important to distinguish scientism from science) or positivist world view largely excludes metaphysics because it deals only with the lower, time based, material and mechanistic aspects of causality, namely the material and the efficient causes, as these- being within the material and time based world- can be empirically observed. Formal and final causality are certainly operative among all beings. Although they are not directly observable, their effects are. For example, an acorn does not contain- in a material sense- the full grown oak. It does contain the in-FORM-ation, via the formal cause, which serves the final cause of becoming the full grown oak. The formal cause directs the inferior material cause/causes- informing the acorn, the soil, the nutrients in the soil, the photosynthetic process, the irrigation and the efficient cause, the planting of the acorn, towards the final end of the fully grown oak which, in turn, generates the acorns for future generations of oaks.

    None of the foregoing has anything to do with positive theology or Biblical history.

    Religious belief is based upon the acceptance of a particular Divine revelation, given within history. The belief in a Supreme Being or God does not require the acceptance of any particular revelation per se, but this is not to say that all traditions based upon revelations are equally true or valid.

    A purely naturalistic or materialistic vision of the cosmos based upon the false notion that only what is measurable, quantifiable or validated through experiment really exists, is absurd in the extreme, and is merely a dogmatic de fide declaration of the modern world against transcendence, vertical causality and the higher causal order, which relies upon Being, not contingent beings. Contingent beings, which are created spirits or physical and corporeal beings, cannot create themselves. If a self- a form- a person- a thing- does not exist from all eternity, how can it possibly assemble itself? In the ontological realm, there is eminence, dependance, and finality. No contingent being embodies these principles.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mulegino1
    "I consider your omnipotent Creator to be the most complex thing imaginable. By definition he must be, in order to create his less complex creations. We can’t do what you claim your god does. Yet you accept that he doesn’t require a more complex creator. He spontaneously created himself, or always existed. You don’ know."

    Of course God, or the Being, does not require a creator, since He is the ground and author of all contingent being and all causality. "We" obviously cannot do what God does because we are not God. God is pure act; He is immutable, eternal. He did not "spontaneously create Himself" because creation is a temporal, or contingent event. God is the author of time, space and contingent events.

    "The metaphysical basis for his existence is solely a product of the human mind. 'There is not a shred of empirical evidence to support this'."

    The metaphysical basis for His existence is not solely a product of the human mind, but a rational philosophical conclusion based upon the order of causality, which, in its non-temporal forms, cannot be quantified, measured or empirically observed. It can only be deduced from its effects, which are clearly not based upon mechanics or time.

    "What I am proposing is that the mountains of scientific empirical evidence is showing that god is not what primitive minds thought he was. God began this creation not as a fully formed omnipotent being from the top down, but in his elementary form as the basic elementary particle from the bottom up. Because you cannot grasp the concept that god is capable of doing it this way doesn’t mean it isn’t so."

    What you are proposing is modernist Protestant process theology, which is, in essence, the idea that the causal order proceeds from the inferior to the superior in kind of a reverse hierarchy, actually a lowerarchy, i.e., matter is the principle of eminence and dependence, which acts upon efficient causality which in turn acts upon the formal and final causes. This is simply an inversion of the true causal order, in which the superior causes, namely the formal and final, act upon the material and efficient. Such concepts are merely signs of one of the degenerative principles, or anti-principles, of the modern world, the revolt of the inferior, and what Rene Guenon described as the "Reign of Quantity."

    All great spiritual traditions are metaphysical in origin.

    Of course God, or the Being, does not require a creator, since He is the ground and author of all contingent being and all causality.

    I didn’t say that god required a creator. Only that it undermines his assertion that:

    Mark, and you want to believe in the spontaneous generation of complex systems without input from a designer or information necessary for that complex system.

    According to you god required no such input.

    The metaphysical basis for His existence is not solely a product of the human mind, but a rational philosophical conclusion based upon the order of causality, which, in its non-temporal forms, cannot be quantified, measured or empirically observed. It can only be deduced from its effects, which are clearly not based upon mechanics or time.

    All great spiritual traditions are metaphysical in origin.

    This demonstrates how illogical you are. No matter how much verbiage you use, it is still the product of the human mind. The Greeks, Romans and all other primitive cultures did exactly the same thing. They have been proven wrong. Do you believe in their Gods? Why do you believe that the very recent Jewish god is the one true god. And by the way you now have a pantheon of 3 gods.

    This is simply an inversion of the true causal order

    Duh! I stated that in no uncertain terms. Good sleuthing.

    Look, I wouldn’t mind having a discussion with you, but you keep regurgitating the same dogma. Try to open your mind. If you feel that Christianity is under attack, it is because of the intolerance of people like you.

    I have stated my desire to bridge the gap between science and religion. What do you think of the Catholic priests effort to do the same by proposing the omega point?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1

    The Greeks, Romans and all other primitive cultures did exactly the same thing. They have been proven wrong. Do you believe in their Gods? Why do you believe that the very recent Jewish god is the one true god. And by the way you now have a pantheon of 3 gods.
     
    I would hardly characterize the Greeks and Romans as "primitive cultures." By the time of Socrates, the Greek gods- or rather their concept of the gods- had degenerated to the point of an anthropomorphic and purely exoteric popular religiosity. The Roman cult, which avoided the anthropomorphic conception of the gods more so than the Greeks, had become for the most part a formalized and empty ceremonial ritual. However, during this period many aspects of the ancient primordial Tradition or revelation had been preserved in the mystery cults, such as those of Eleusis.

    One can observe such a cycle in most of the great spiritual traditions, even in Christianity, which has degenerated in this manner ever since the Renaissance period, evinced by the iconography and architecture of the period. The Gothic was a magnificent expression of the Medieval synthesis with its emphasis upon the transcendence and infinity of the Supreme Being and the celestial realm, while the Renaissance art and architecture, however magnificent, became more and more earth oriented and anthropomorphic. The changes reflected in art and architecture reflected the increasing descent of spirituality from contemplative to active, from esoteric to exoteric.

    I have stated my desire to bridge the gap between science and religion. What do you think of the Catholic priests effort to do the same by proposing the omega point?



     

    Are you referring to Teilhard de Chardin, the famous Jesuit paleontologist?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sbaker
    Mark, and you want to believe in the spontaneous generation of complex systems without input from a designer or information necessary for that complex system.

    I consider your omnipotent Creator to be the most complex thing imaginable. By definition he must be, in order to create his less complex creations. We can’t do what you claim your god does. Yet you accept that he doesn’t require a more complex creator. He spontaneously created himself, or always existed. You don’ know.

    The metaphysical basis for his existence is solely a product of the human mind. “There is not a shred of empirical evidence to support this”.

    I provided a link to a documentary that contains a lot of empirical evidence that show how the universe evolved. Apparently you didn’t watch it or understand it. Please watch and try to understand it. There is mountains of empirical scientific evidence that show how the earth evolved. Your ignorance of this data is astounding.

    What I am proposing is that the mountains of scientific empirical evidence is showing that god is not what primitive minds thought he was. God began this creation not as a fully formed omnipotent being from the top down, but in his elementary form as the basic elementary particle from the bottom up. Because you cannot grasp the concept that god is capable of doing it this way doesn’t mean it isn’t so.

    I am not a fan of the proposition of the uncaused cause, but let’s start from there. Some people argue that the “big bang” is something out of nothing. There is a theory that before the “big bang” the god particles existed in a very small singularity outside of space/time. It may have always been there, as in the God theory. The “big bang” created space/time itself.

    Scientists downplay this theory, because it is as metaphysical as the god theory. And there are other such theories such as eternal inflation and the multiverse. But there is no empirical evidence for any of them, so the beginning must be simply that the universe exists as we know it.

    It gets worse, every time we think we find an answer, two more questions pop up. The universe keeps getting stranger and stranger.

    Every primitive human culture has had a creation theory that posits good spirits and evil spirits and that all things happen by the will of the gods. I’ve never seen a good spirit, I’ve never seen an evil spirit, I’ve never seen a god. Have you seen any of them? Were the Greeks and Romans right? They have all been proven wrong.

    What I have seen is mountains of empirical evidence that support scientific theories. Please educate yourself.

    I call this particle the god particle because it does indeed have the power to create. But it has no intelligence, no purpose. So why do I think it will evolve into the god we seek? There is a theory called the Omega Point. It posits that it draws us to divine unification.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_Point

    I reject this because it implies purpose. I will make the same case with a little logic. We will continue to evolve until it’s not possible to evolve further. That point is perfection as defined by our universe. Perfection is God.

    Just to get you started:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    "I consider your omnipotent Creator to be the most complex thing imaginable. By definition he must be, in order to create his less complex creations. We can’t do what you claim your god does. Yet you accept that he doesn’t require a more complex creator. He spontaneously created himself, or always existed. You don’ know."

    Of course God, or the Being, does not require a creator, since He is the ground and author of all contingent being and all causality. "We" obviously cannot do what God does because we are not God. God is pure act; He is immutable, eternal. He did not "spontaneously create Himself" because creation is a temporal, or contingent event. God is the author of time, space and contingent events.

    "The metaphysical basis for his existence is solely a product of the human mind. 'There is not a shred of empirical evidence to support this'."

    The metaphysical basis for His existence is not solely a product of the human mind, but a rational philosophical conclusion based upon the order of causality, which, in its non-temporal forms, cannot be quantified, measured or empirically observed. It can only be deduced from its effects, which are clearly not based upon mechanics or time.

    "What I am proposing is that the mountains of scientific empirical evidence is showing that god is not what primitive minds thought he was. God began this creation not as a fully formed omnipotent being from the top down, but in his elementary form as the basic elementary particle from the bottom up. Because you cannot grasp the concept that god is capable of doing it this way doesn’t mean it isn’t so."

    What you are proposing is modernist Protestant process theology, which is, in essence, the idea that the causal order proceeds from the inferior to the superior in kind of a reverse hierarchy, actually a lowerarchy, i.e., matter is the principle of eminence and dependence, which acts upon efficient causality which in turn acts upon the formal and final causes. This is simply an inversion of the true causal order, in which the superior causes, namely the formal and final, act upon the material and efficient. Such concepts are merely signs of one of the degenerative principles, or anti-principles, of the modern world, the revolt of the inferior, and what Rene Guenon described as the "Reign of Quantity."

    All great spiritual traditions are metaphysical in origin.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @HallParvey

    That is God’s description-not mine. And God says that all people outside of Jesus Christ are headed to that place unless they repent of their sins and turn by faith to Jesus Christ.
     
    No. That description was written by mortal man using quills on papyrus or some other such early writing system. Just as the fables surrounding the Greek gods were written. Just as the fables surrounding the Norse gods were written. Just as J K Rowling wrote the fables of Hogwarts.

    Sorry if I was’t clear, that’s a quote from Bill Graham.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @nickels
    We Orthodox believe that everyone will eventually participate in the light of God.
    To some that will be an unbearable scorching light, i.e. the burning flames of hell. To the saved it will be some sort of profound completion, paradise.

    I personally believe this relates to our free will in the same way as our understanding of his creation, the world. Some see the beautiful architecture and the wonder-others deny that and insist it must be random, and that life, therefore is totally meaningless, as we are just electrons bound to disintegrate one say. But that is only a personal interpretation, not dogma.

    Our God is glorious, loving and terrifying all at once. Too many people thing our God is a hippie-that is not at all the case.
    God wants those who make the cut, not slackers.

    To the saved it will be some sort of profound completion, paradise.

    God wants those who make the cut, not slackers.

    I read long ago that this is one facet that drew people to Christianity. The elitist attitude that only chosen few would sit beside their King in court and haughtily look down their noses at the lesser souls writhing in hell.

    To some that will be an unbearable scorching light, i.e. the burning flames of hell.

    Let me reiterate that it will be the vast majority since most are not Christians, plus those that don’t make the cut. It would not surprise me to learn that you believe your Orthodox sect is the one true religion, and therefore the only ones to qualify.

    I personally believe this relates to our free will in the same way as our understanding of his creation, the world.

    What about the children who are raised in, say, Hindu countries. Their free will is impeded. If God holds us to such high standards, He needs to hold himself to higher standards and do more to get his word out if He punishes us for breaking His laws.

    His deafening silence is evidence to me that your God doesn’t exist. If He does exist, I consider the God you describe to me as pure evil. I don’ believe it. This is why I left the Catholic church long ago and never looked back.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nickels
    It sounds like you have a lot to learn about Christianity.
    I suggest going to an Orthodox church or Catholic church.

    Often when we are younger we completely miss the message. You should go back now that you have all these questions in your mind.

    Your questions are easily addressed and easily answered, they are very common basic questions that a priest can help with.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @manorchurch
    We need a defining term. "Fullashitism" seems appropriate, but a bit vulgar.

    Gee guys, great comebacks, maybe if you could come up with cogent arguments I might take you seriously.

    Everything I said about the evolution of the universe is current valid scientific theory based on the big bang. This is the best evidence we have. If you can’t accept scientific theory, you are hopeless. If you need to hear it from an actual physicist start at 4:15

    Everything I said about the evolution of DNA is current valid scientific theory, or Darwinism as you people utterly failed to discredit. See comment 46.

    My putting a God spin on it is a sincere effort to reconcile science, religion and philosophy, all of which have contributed so much to understanding our existence. It seems that you are incredibly close minded.

    But I do believe want I said. Science fiction is loaded with ideas about evolving to a higher plane of existence. Stargate SG1 and Atlantis are loaded with them. Or start here:

    Read More
    • Replies: @manorchurch

    My putting a God spin on it is a sincere effort to reconcile science, religion and philosophy, all of which have contributed so much to understanding our existence. It seems that you are incredibly close minded.
     
    Whatever for? I see no need to "reconcile" science, religion and philosophy. Not that "philosophy" is semantically applicable in your context.

    Here, read this: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/process-philosophy/

    It's heavy-going, if you can understand it at all. But, if you do, you'll be a lot closer to knowing why any "reconciliation" is non sequitur.
    , @Sbaker
    Mark, and you want to believe in the spontaneous generation of complex systems without input from a designer or information necessary for that complex system.
    , @Sbaker
    There is not a shred of empirical evidence to support the spontaneous generation of the earth, a near perfect habitat for the existence of complex life. Some humans, no animal species, are simply taken in by observing the beauty of what is around, and in us, that calls many of us to believe in God. We find this belief in God only in humans.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @nickels
    Theistic evolution is just as much nonsense as materialistic evolution.

    The simple mechanism of natural selection is an absurdity.

    There is no evidence of evolving complexity-there is only evidence for the attrition of forms.

    We humans were created as we are, or, in fact, better than we are.

    There are also many theological reasons to ignore evolution, as it profanes and makes absurd the entire theology of mankind and the fall.

    Read Seraphim Rose, Genesis, Creation, and Early Man.

    You mentioned the fall. Do you believe that your God is going to cast all who are not saved by Jesus into a lake of fire and cause them to suffer the horrors of being burnt alive, every second of their existence for eternity? Isn’t this the vast majority of the human race? You worship an evil God.

    Genesis 3:17

    To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat of it,’

    “Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat of it all the days of your life.”

    Revelation 20:10
    And the devil, who deceived them, was thrown into the lake of burning sulfur, where the beast and the false prophet had been thrown. They will be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

    Matthew 25:41
    Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.

    However, Billy Graham is an acknowledged authority on the Evangelical concept of Hell. The following is an excerpt from one of his sermons:

    You say, “Well, what kind of a place is hell?” I’m going to read to you right out of the Bible what kind of place it is. This is where some of you are going to spend billions and billions of years. You’d better listen. This is God’s Word.

    Revelation 20:15 says it’s a lake of fire. Psalm 11:6 says it’s a horrible tempest. Psalm 18:5 says it’s a place of sorrows. Matthew 13:42 says it’s a place of wailing, a furnace of fire. Luke 16:23 says it’s a place of torments. Matthew 8:12 says it’s a place of outer darkness. Revelation 14:11 says it’s a place of unrest. Luke 16:24 says it’s a place where people scream for mercy. Matthew 25:46 says it’s a place of everlasting punishment.

    That is God’s description-not mine. And God says that all people outside of Jesus Christ are headed to that place unless they repent of their sins and turn by faith to Jesus Christ.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nickels
    We Orthodox believe that everyone will eventually participate in the light of God.
    To some that will be an unbearable scorching light, i.e. the burning flames of hell. To the saved it will be some sort of profound completion, paradise.

    I personally believe this relates to our free will in the same way as our understanding of his creation, the world. Some see the beautiful architecture and the wonder-others deny that and insist it must be random, and that life, therefore is totally meaningless, as we are just electrons bound to disintegrate one say. But that is only a personal interpretation, not dogma.

    Our God is glorious, loving and terrifying all at once. Too many people thing our God is a hippie-that is not at all the case.
    God wants those who make the cut, not slackers.

    , @HallParvey

    That is God’s description-not mine. And God says that all people outside of Jesus Christ are headed to that place unless they repent of their sins and turn by faith to Jesus Christ.
     
    No. That description was written by mortal man using quills on papyrus or some other such early writing system. Just as the fables surrounding the Greek gods were written. Just as the fables surrounding the Norse gods were written. Just as J K Rowling wrote the fables of Hogwarts.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    Reasonable according to whom?

    Reasonable according to whom?

    More reasonable by the simple logic that we are so much simpler than an Omnipotent Being capable of creating space/time itself.

    In fact what was created in the “big bang” was the simplest thing of all, a single elementary particle that I call the God particle. Evolution is all about this God particle assembling itself into the God we seek.

    Shortly after the “big bang” this God particle evolved into the 12 elementary particles of the Standard Model, then into hydrogen and helium. Then into first generation stars where elements up to iron evolved. Then super novae where the heavier elements evolved. Then into second generation stars where DNA evolved.

    After another 3.5 billion years of evolution we achieved consciousness. Our belief in the Gods is simply self awareness, a realization of who we are and what we are becoming.

    Think about how you created yourself in your mother’s womb. You started out as very small single cell and assembled yourself. There was no creator in there assembling you.

    This is how the universe works. It is bottom up, not top down. The universe is God’s womb and we are embryonic Gods. It has taken us 15 billion years to get this far and it may take another 15 billion years to get there, but the pleasure is in the journey.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nickels
    Bizarre.
    You are ok with a mystical pantheism that came from nothing, but not ok with a creator.
    Your position is irrational.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mulegino1
    Your metaphysics are quite amateurish. God does not require a creator as He is the Supreme Being, the source of all subordinate beings, the author and ground of the causal order and, is eternal and self-subsistent. Being eternal, infinite and pure spirit, He is not circumscribed by time or space. He is the Author of time - the principle of contingency and change, the relationship between agent and patient, and space, the ground for the interaction of subordinate beings within the world of contingency and corporal beings. Space and time are themselves the ground for the causal order in the physical world. This casual order was created by God, who is not subject to it. With God there is no before or after.

    Darwinists, transformists, or whatever they choose to call themselves are the ones who are obsessed with God, or rather, with excluding any thought of vertical, non- mechanistic based causality from their pitiful universe since it tends to upset their own rather limited- anachronistic world view based upon long discredited notions of a purely material and mechanistic universe. They want to abolish formal and final causality- which is certainly and absolutely operative in nature - keeping only the efficient and material causes. Like the proverbial goldfish in a bowl, their world is matter. How they can even speak of things like "Natural selection" with a straight face- one wonders what god of matter is doing the selecting- is beyond me.

    Thanks for getting this thread back on topic. You cannot prove one single thing you wrote. You have no evidence whatever. It is all fabricated nonsense. You believe it simply because you want to believe it.

    This is Lance Welton’s point. The belief that there is no difference between the races despite mountains of evidence to contrary, is as irrational as your belief in a magical being. The capacity for human self delusion is astounding.

    The new religion of Antiracism is eclipsing Christianity and will result in the destruction of Western Civilization if not stopped.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein

    Thanks for getting this thread back on topic. You cannot prove one single thing you wrote. You have no evidence whatever. It is all fabricated nonsense. You believe it simply because you want to believe it.
     
    There is no arguing with this kind of rank stupidity. Mulegino gives a clear synopsis of some rather basic metaphysical prerequisites for understand the natural (not the "supernatural") world, and this idiot, Mark Presco, just jabbers away like a wound-up Dennett bobble-head.

    Can anyone not see that these self-styled, high-IQ "brights" are really the biggest morons that God ever let through the door? Can anyone not agree that they deserve, at this point, only invective, all attempts at being reasonable having utterly failed?
    , @Sbaker
    Mark, and you want to believe in the spontaneous generation of complex systems without input from a designer or information necessary for that complex system.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mulegino1
    It is a matter of philosophical world views, not facts. With respect to the highlights of the documentary you referred to- these scientists do not believe in "the truth" because truth is a metaphysical or ontological concept, not something that can be circumscribed or defined by empirical observation or statistics. And of course, in a scientific community absolutely dominated by Darwinian orthodoxy, all discoveries and observations will be used to retroactively validate Darwinian theory, since the heresy of vertical, non-temporal causality has no place in the world of scientism.

    I can just as easily refer you to this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IHO-QkmomY



    Now, you may object that this documentary was made by those with an agenda. However, Nova and PBS also have a Darwinian agenda. The idea that any scientist or anyone else is absolutely objective in drawing conclusions based upon data is highly dubious.

    Like this documentary you ignore inconvenient evidence, and pointing out problems in Darwin’s theory disproves nothing.

    Let’s discuss your Creation theory. If you claim that miraculous things require more miraculous creators, then who created God? And who created that creator, and on and on you go into infinity postulating ever more miraculous creators. This is called infinite regression. Philosophers have a lame rationalization for this called the “uncaused cause”, or first cause. It’s nonsense.

    Your theory is obliterated if you argue that God doesn’t require a creator. It is far more reasonable to assert that we lesser humans require no creator.

    I can provide an expanded theory that may appeal to you religious types, but we are far off topic already.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Reasonable according to whom?
    , @Mulegino1
    Your metaphysics are quite amateurish. God does not require a creator as He is the Supreme Being, the source of all subordinate beings, the author and ground of the causal order and, is eternal and self-subsistent. Being eternal, infinite and pure spirit, He is not circumscribed by time or space. He is the Author of time - the principle of contingency and change, the relationship between agent and patient, and space, the ground for the interaction of subordinate beings within the world of contingency and corporal beings. Space and time are themselves the ground for the causal order in the physical world. This casual order was created by God, who is not subject to it. With God there is no before or after.

    Darwinists, transformists, or whatever they choose to call themselves are the ones who are obsessed with God, or rather, with excluding any thought of vertical, non- mechanistic based causality from their pitiful universe since it tends to upset their own rather limited- anachronistic world view based upon long discredited notions of a purely material and mechanistic universe. They want to abolish formal and final causality- which is certainly and absolutely operative in nature - keeping only the efficient and material causes. Like the proverbial goldfish in a bowl, their world is matter. How they can even speak of things like "Natural selection" with a straight face- one wonders what god of matter is doing the selecting- is beyond me.
    , @manorchurch

    Your theory is obliterated if you argue that God doesn’t require a creator. It is far more reasonable to assert that we lesser humans require no creator.
     
    Not to get too technical, and not to be, um, argumentative? -- but, all of that "can't have something from nothing" analysis went out the window with Hume (on a metaphysical level, of course). Assuming/reasoning from principles of infinitely regressive cause/effect instantiated from one point of origination in space and time -- she no work. Worse, assuming that said "origin" requires and establishes omnipotence, immanence, infinity and eternity is many steps too far.

    Sure, it works for Italians, Jews and Palestinians, but it is still unfounded assumption.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mulegino1
    Theoretically, yes, provided there were a gradual series of major mutations leading to the transition between cold blooded reptiles and warm blooded avians, but there is no evidence in the fossil record for this, and its genetic probabilities are close to zero, due to many factors, including the utter uselessness of appendages which were previously feet or claws gradually becoming wings, and scales gradually becoming feathers, due to thousands of generations of entirely fortuitous genetic mutations. Organisms in nature do not behave in this fashion, i.e., they do not undergo "linear progress" but are subject to the laws of causality, and it is the formal/final-vertical information defining organisms- which act upon them, and the material and efficient causes are usually entirely subordinate to the former. When this is not fully the case, there are deviations and deformities, and the result is never good.

    Nova – Judgment Day Intelligent Design On Trial

    Very interesting points at timelines 50:00 and 1:04:00

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    It is a matter of philosophical world views, not facts. With respect to the highlights of the documentary you referred to- these scientists do not believe in "the truth" because truth is a metaphysical or ontological concept, not something that can be circumscribed or defined by empirical observation or statistics. And of course, in a scientific community absolutely dominated by Darwinian orthodoxy, all discoveries and observations will be used to retroactively validate Darwinian theory, since the heresy of vertical, non-temporal causality has no place in the world of scientism.

    I can just as easily refer you to this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IHO-QkmomY



    Now, you may object that this documentary was made by those with an agenda. However, Nova and PBS also have a Darwinian agenda. The idea that any scientist or anyone else is absolutely objective in drawing conclusions based upon data is highly dubious.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A few thoughts on our disastrous trillion-dollar military: It is unnecessary. It does not defend the United States. The last time it did so was in 1945. The United States has no military enemies. No nation has anything even close to the forces necessary to invade America, and probably none the desire. A fifth of...
  • @SteveM

    While I agree with some of Fred’s points, he is incorrect when he says Americans don’t benefit from it. Almost all expenditures provide great jobs for Americans.
     
    Without considering the alternative opportunities to use the money, that is a bogus, species argument.

    Those same Americans could have been doing the same kinds of work associated with producing real products and services that provide real value to Americans beyond those parasitically attached to the MIC.

    Throwing Hundreds of Billions at hyper-boondoggle weapons systems like the F-35, F-22, Littoral Combat Ship (LCS), Zumwalt Class Destroyer, Army Future Combat System, etc., etc., etc., is the high tech equivalent of using tax dollars to have people dig holes and then fill them back in.

    P.S. But at least nobody get needlessly slaughtered from wasteful hole digging...

    First of all it is not a specious argument. It is 100% true as stated. Your value judgment is specious because it assumes that we need no military. The primary power that the Constitution gives the federal government is to provide for the common defense. My stint in aerospace was during the cold war when the vast majority of Americans deemed this to be self evident.

    Secondly, there is ample evidence in my comment to show that I somewhat agree with you. The welfare/warfare spending is way out of control and will result in an economic collapse. Read the link I provided.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • While I agree with some of Fred’s points, he is incorrect when he says Americans don’t benefit from it. Almost all expenditures provide great jobs for Americans. From scientists to engineers to soldiers. My own stint in aerospace was the best education I ever received, learning digital design.

    Accuse me of taking corporate welfare if you like. Lockheed was probably awarded the F-35 contract over Boeing in order to keep its workforce employed.

    The military does do much of what it is intended to do, but now that the cold war is over I would prefer it focus on homeland security.

    Currently the military is being misused in order to try to save Americans from the collapse of the ponzi scheme that is the US dollar.

    https://steemit.com/petrodollar/@freemarketcap/the-us-is-at-war-with-iraq-libya-syria-iran-russia-all-to-protect-the-petrodollar

    Read More
    • Replies: @SteveM

    While I agree with some of Fred’s points, he is incorrect when he says Americans don’t benefit from it. Almost all expenditures provide great jobs for Americans.
     
    Without considering the alternative opportunities to use the money, that is a bogus, species argument.

    Those same Americans could have been doing the same kinds of work associated with producing real products and services that provide real value to Americans beyond those parasitically attached to the MIC.

    Throwing Hundreds of Billions at hyper-boondoggle weapons systems like the F-35, F-22, Littoral Combat Ship (LCS), Zumwalt Class Destroyer, Army Future Combat System, etc., etc., etc., is the high tech equivalent of using tax dollars to have people dig holes and then fill them back in.

    P.S. But at least nobody get needlessly slaughtered from wasteful hole digging...
    , @prusmc
    Lockheed knew how to play the game and it paid off big time. Components for the F35 are produced in 47 of the 57 states and who knows how many of the 435 Congessional districts. Other than Silicon valley and its' subsidiaries in Triangle Park, Cambridge, and such, the only really paying non-government jobs in the USE A are in the defense industry.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The analysis of the recent exchanges between French President Emmanuel Macron and President Donald Trump suggest that Washington is most likely about to withdraw from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) nuclear agreement with Iran that was signed by the U.S. and five other governments in July 2015. The decision will likely be made...
  • This is a verbose article that tries to be too clever by half. It is all old news.

    The whole reason for the JCPOA agreement was that we already knew Iran was developing nuclear weapons. All Netanyahu (proved) is that Iran lied about it.

    Anyone who believes that Iran won’t continue to pursue nuclear weaponization regardless of what deals it signs is naive in the extreme. It can can only be made more difficult.

    Anyone want to speculate that Israel has already smuggled a nuke into Iran and is perfectly happy to let Iran believe it?

    Don’t misunderstand me. I am not supporting Shiite hegemony. Just observing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @L.K
    You are just another miserable zionist shill, that's what...
    , @Art
    Anyone want to speculate that Israel has already smuggled a nuke into Iran and is perfectly happy to let Iran believe it?

    Why would anyone support such a devious mendacious nation?

    Think Peace --- Art

    p.s. Jesus said, “live by the sword – die by the sword.” – Hmm!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A wonderful, joyful day, a jubilant summit! On the bloody 38th parallel, for the first time in many years, the two Koreans met, the leaders of the two Korean states. There were affable smiles and a spontaneous brief and unscripted visit of the southern president to the northern country, and then the northern one -...
  • I have never put much stock in the author’s position that the US has prevented reunification. This is another example of victimology excuse making. I put the onus on the Koreans themselves. They both could have and should have done it themselves by now.

    The biggest obstacle was the Kims and their supporters who simply wanted to retain their privileged life style, and a population who wouldn’t fight for their own freedoms. The south Koreans, simply taking the easy path.

    I don’t know what is going on behind the scenes, but I hope there is real progress. But to reiterate, it is the responsibility of the Koreans themselves to pick up the ball and run with it if they really want to achieve anything at all.

    However, let take a different tack. Maybe they shouldn’t fully reunify. In the coming balkanization of the USA, I want to live in a white nation. It will be built on the individualistic pillars established in the Constitution. The white nationalist collectivists must have their own nation, these communists will not be welcome in mine.

    So maybe the Koreans should build on what they already have. The south more capitalist and individualist, and the north collectivist, with people free to seek the culture which best suits their nature. However, they should keep their ethnic identify and work more closely together.

    Read More
    • Replies: @myself

    However, let take a different tack. Maybe they shouldn’t fully reunify. In the coming balkanization of the USA, I want to live in a white nation. It will be built on the individualistic pillars established in the Constitution. The white nationalist collectivists must have their own nation, these communists will not be welcome in mine.
     
    I, for one, fail to see what some Asians do in their lands has anything to do with what Whites do in theirs.

    Let the Koreans unify - it should mean nothing at all to Whites.
    , @TT

    In the coming balkanization of the USA, I want to live in a white nation.
     
    Kamma is always fair, what's go out come back eventually. So which state you have chosen for your white nation? Alaska?

    Im afraid you might have to move to East Europe or Russia for that last few batons of wasp.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Every so often you come across Stalinists (and earnest, if misguided, vatniks) claiming that Solzhenitsyn called on the US to nuke the USSR. Here is their "evidence" from a 1975 speech: Problem #1 - Where is the actual call to attack - let alone nuke - the USSR? If you are particularly paranoid, I suppose...
  • @Art Deco
    https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/sep/07/john-le-carre-on-trump-something-truly-seriously-bad-is-happening

    He's a witless crank who likely hasn't had a peer-to-peer conversation with a serious interlocutor in 40 years.

    It’s pretty amazing how three Cornwells (Bernard, David and Patricia, although the last only by injection) have become bestselling authors. I think David Cornwell is a great spinner of yarns whose observations on the human condition need to be taken with a grain of salt. I have always enjoyed his novels, because he really knows how to tell a story. But the way he equated both sides during the Cold War, because of the West’s occasional less than ethical maneuvers, was more than a little overwrought. He had a particular contempt for Americans that way pre-dated Trump.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • Not one of you, including the author, understand what is going on. This is not about hegemony, it is not a game of Risk, it is far more serious. It is about saving the Western economy. We are trying to tell Russia how batshit crazy we are prepared to be in order to keep the ponzi scheme that is the US dollar going.

    https://steemit.com/petrodollar/@freemarketcap/the-us-is-at-war-with-iraq-libya-syria-iran-russia-all-to-protect-the-petrodollar

    https://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/markets/item/4630-gadhafi-s-gold-money-plan-would-have-devastated-dollar

    https://followthemoney.com/preparing-for-the-collapse-of-the-petrodollar-system-part-1/

    Read More
    • Agree: Mike P
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Merit-based immigration” is seen as the gold standard of immigration reform by many Republicans and conservative policy wonks. But it could lead to their political ruin. We already have a clear window into what a merit-based policy could bring to the political landscape: look at the Indian colonization of Seattle’s Eastside—the area across Lake Washington...
  • @Ju Ahn
    If white people are smart, contented to stay in their own borders. Why did they go around the world demanding people to trade with them? It was European nations who begged (in the 15-1600s) than demanded ( in 18-1900s when they gained more power) to trade with Asian countries.

    But you WNs obviously have stunted memories and history lessons, so it's normal not to expect civil and logical discussions with you guys.

    Why are white people in South Africa? It's predominantly an African country. Why are white people still living in overseas? Just Answer that. Why are they there?

    Ju Ahn

    First let me clear up some misconceptions you have about South Africa. Whites, specifically Boers (Dutch farmers) did not steal land from Africans. They settled sparsely populated land, much of it marginal, in the southwest. At roughly the same time several black tribes settled in the northeast, numbering no more than 5 million.

    As whites developed an economy and jobs, migrants from all over Africa flooded into the southwest, exploding the population to over 50 million. They used democracy to seize control and then voted themselves a license to steal the land they never had a claim to.

    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/truth-lies-south-african-history-blacks-indigenous-arrived-kobus-jfk/

    Whites are beginning to realize that this will be the fate of all white cultures unless we stop it. We do not intend to become minorities to hostile invaders.

    Off topic, do you have a way to get the word out that pictures from 1967 South Korea are available here:

    http://korea1967.blogspot.com/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    You should be ashamed of yourself for engaging in ignorant bluster.

    You are even ignorant of the more or less accurate published records of average Indian IQ which is low despite the fact that millions in the upper castes have IQs significantly above the white American average. So "if Indians are so smart" is just fatuous.

    Far from Indian immigrants to the US dumping themselves on white America and demanding that "we" [*you* FFS!] provide "them a first world quality of life" they are probably amongst Mitt Romney's 47 per cent who, as taxpayers, actually pay their way. Are you? Could you be with your revealed cognitive limitations?

    There is nothing ignorant about what I said. It is a fact that India is a third world country. The reason is that Indian men do not provide their people with the jobs necessary to make India a first world country. Your babbling doesn’t change that fact. Explain why the high IQ Indians aren’t creating businesses that take advantage of the vast cheap labor pool available to them.

    For all practical purposes, only white men provide jobs for people in this country. Not white women, not blacks and not Hispanics. Please don’t make me spell it out for you. White men provide our people with the highest quality of life on the planet.

    This is why Indians come here, to get the first world jobs they obviously can’t get in India. Microsoft has been mentioned. Bill Gates, a white man, created these jobs that Indians are clamoring for. Your ignorance of where these jobs come from is astounding. Apparently you believe that the Cargo Gods dropped them from the sky. Too bad they missed India.

    As for myself, I accepted a contract from a design center in Singapore. The 3 Indian and 4 Chinese engineers got stumped designing a custom microprocessor. I got the project back on track. The Indians, were practically useless.

    http://myplace.frontier.com/~mpresco/index.htm

    Just to repeat myself, these POS Indians victimize the world by failing to make their country into a first world country, failing to become equal partners of the “International Community” available to assist the truly needy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    So you have some narrow technical specialty which apparently can be acquired without even Logic 101 or any grasp of statistics or probability. That's what enables you to form views about a country and people with more variety than the whole of Europe from acquaintance with three Indian engineers! And that's when you were going to Singapore to maintain your First World way of life. Why, btw, are so many Americans working outside America rather than staying at home to relieve your country's appalling problems like homelessness, bankruptcy by medical bill and decaying infrastructure?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • If Indians are so smart, why can’t they provide jobs for their own people? Perhaps these indispensable Indians are needed in India in order to make India a first world country. Shouldn’t that be their primary responsibility?

    Like all other third worlders, the only thing they have figured out to do is dump themselves white men and demand that we provide them a first world quality of life.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TT
    See what happen in US & the West now that lay the good pay manufacturing sector to waste, extreme corrupted ruling class looking after own oligarchy interest.

    US was built up by forefathers & hardworking migrants (besides all the raping of world resources through endless wars), when it collapse, you will understand why US could not provide jobs for its people. Ask the corrupted ruling class & capitalist.

    Pre-colonial India been a ~40% world GDP like China, was diminished into 4% world GDP after British colonial master depart, with millions of Indian sepoy dying to help them invade other countries.

    Thereafter, it continue to invade all neighbours including China(get humiliating defeated) up to now, squandering all essential resources in corruption & military. The ruling caste simply uninterested in helping the poor or built a prosperous strong country. A mirror of current West.

    Unlike India, Chinese know better to expand the cake. By 2020, it will eliminate all poverty while all our so called 1st world are still having 20% poverty.
    , @Anonymous
    You should be ashamed of yourself for engaging in ignorant bluster.

    You are even ignorant of the more or less accurate published records of average Indian IQ which is low despite the fact that millions in the upper castes have IQs significantly above the white American average. So "if Indians are so smart" is just fatuous.

    Far from Indian immigrants to the US dumping themselves on white America and demanding that "we" [*you* FFS!] provide "them a first world quality of life" they are probably amongst Mitt Romney's 47 per cent who, as taxpayers, actually pay their way. Are you? Could you be with your revealed cognitive limitations?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • With slight disappointment the public regarded the field. Just a minute ago, two knights were converging in fearsome joust, their spears pointing forth, plumage blowing, horses galloping, ladies out waving their handkerchiefs to their champions, - and now we see they have passed each other, both firmly in the saddle, plumage unruffled, spears unbloodied, horses...
  • This article is a lot of useless verbiage focusing on the kabuki theater by which the masses need to be distracted.

    The reason for this madness has nothing to do with any of the reasons stated. My best guess is that It has to do with the global ponzi scheme that is the US dollar. Trump goes along with it because he has been counseled that this is necessary to prevent a global economic collapse. Same for France and Britain. This discredits the conspiracy theory that the global elite want a collapse.

    What amazes me is that Russia knows what the real reason for this insanity is, but they also stick to the prescribed talking points. As do the author and most of the commenters

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • President Trump is so pissed off by the Stormy affair that he is likely to prefer a good old war to another humiliation. This suits his enemies and friends (though not his voters) to a tee. He has a choice of doing a difficult manly act that needs all his courage, but which one? Should...
  • @FB
    Well...this is yet another thoroughly disjointed effort by Shamir...

    As usual the reader is left asking...'what's your point...?'

    Even the Flaker at least presents some kind of coherent thesis...silly as it may usually be...

    ...while Shamir is perfectly content to throw up some Yodaesque flakes of pseudo-wisdom...and leave it at that...

    The article does present some useful factoids and observations...such as the apparent severity and perhaps disproportionality of the Russian diplomat expulsions...didn't know these nuances and appreciate this info...if accurate...

    Also the useful reminder of the Med Sea showdown in 2013...when Obama backed down at the last moment...

    But then Yoda Shamir veers off into the 'Jewish question' and 'white nationalism' to tie the whole bundle together...?

    ...which has what exactly to do with the price of bananas...?

    [Other than Shamir playing to his base...]

    As for the Russians being 'flabbergasted'...well that is certainly useful now isn't it...?

    Personally I don't think 'flabbergast' plays much of a role in Putin's repertoire...and we will see just what VVP's move will be if Dump decides to start a war against Russian ally Syria...as he seems intent on doing...

    The bigger question here is why is this showdown being forced by the McChicken Empire at this precise moment in time...?

    Surely it has nothing to do with Syria...that train left the station long ago...even assuming that Dump and the coalition of dwarfs he is assembling launches a Very Big military assault on Syria...the chances of changing the reality on the ground are slim to none...

    And that's even if we assume that the Russian military response is measured or even just symbolic...

    However...I doubt the Russian response to an attempt to actually mug Syria is going to be anything but measured...

    When the missiles start flying the only calculus that counts is that of military capability...not the 'Jewish question' or anything else for that matter...

    As PCR notes in an excellent and far more salient essay from yesterday...

    '...The Russians know that they can, at will within a few minutes, sink the entire US fleet, destroy every US airplane and ship in the Middle East and within range of the Middle East, completely destroy all of Israel’s military capability and wipe out the military of the two-bit punk state of Saudi Arabia.

    All the sitting ducks have been set up for Russia by the arrogant and stupid Americans. Just a few minutes of Russian attack and all ability to conduct war would be stripped from the Middle East. This would be a good thing...'
     
    The only question PCR notes is whether VVP will actually choose that option...

    Unlike the silly D. Dump...who talked a big game about not telegraphing his military intentions...and now doing exactly the opposite...VVP is keeping mum...

    Fortunately for this thread...we have had a couple of good comments here as to why we are being taken to war at this moment in time...

    'buddy' @ 8 summed it up nicely...

    '...The west is at that point, if it lands on Boardwalk or Park place one more time, its broke.

    Gotta bust up the game before the West loses. throw all the pieces, cards and dice off the board, and fold the board up, put the board back in the monopoly box, else the western Pharaohs will go down; they will be the losers.

    So the war...'
     
    Some of us had seen this coming already even a few weeks ago as the Skripal stunt exploded with such ferocity...

    'Why'...'Why now...?'

    For the sake of regime change in Syria...?

    Doesn't add up...too much to lose and not enough to gain...

    War with Russia is a desperate move...there has to be a reason behind every desperate move...

    Nothing is more desperate an undertaking than war...especially war against a very powerful military...that would be off-the-scale desperation...

    Is the ponzi house of cards about to implode into its own footprint...?

    Something is up...the deep state and the moneybag elite that employs them are the only ones who really know the score as to the degree of teetering that the good ship McChicken is experiencing at any given moment...

    I agree with almost all of what you said. I am no expert, but I believe the weak card in the ponzi scheme is the petro-dollar.

    When the dollar went off of the gold standard, the US convinced the Saudis to sell oil in dollars only. This strengthened the dollar globally. Maybe that’s why the Saudis are part of the coalition.

    Apparently Saddam and Gaddafi threatened this arrangement and the US executed them for it. Perhaps Assad backed by Russia is just as great a threat. It looks like Iraq all over again.

    2. Why doesn’t the US Treasury print debt-free currency, instead of letting the banksters print debt-based currency, ensnaring us in a fiscal trap that can we can never escape?

    Is the petro-dollar the only thing keeping the dollar credit worthy? What happens when the dollar loses its luster?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The obvious and intelligent course regarding immigration from the south is to stop further influx and assimilate those who are not going away and, being citizens, cannot be deported. Mr. Trump’s placing of troops along the border, if carried out, can quickly and practically accomplish the first of these, as his silly wall would not....
  • @Giuseppe

    The way I see it, I’m far better off cooperating with the nordic racist in the hope that this will allow me to carve out a zone of racial homogeneity for myself, rather than supporting the lunacy of anti-racism.
     
    Of course you are, since you cheerfully own embracing white racism yourself. Find a country of white people that isn't likely to allow immigration of the people you detest, transport yourself there, learn the language and call it home.

    (Did I mention that your movement is a passing shadow of a hint of the briefest mention inside of a very small historical footnote, a tiny, even microscopic recrudescence of nordic fetishism that influences nobody? Like the mold in yesterday's Petri dish?)

    You are so preoccupied with how people look "barely any different to pure blooded Indios" that you are unable to see people as they really are. Like the commenter who thought he had a gotcha photo of garbage in Chapala, in truth, all he had was a photo of a neighborhood collection point for residential garbage. The reality, the truth behind your pure blooded Indios and the garbage sacks is quite different, but you will never see it until you let go of your bitterness and can see pure blooded Indios not as studied fetishized contrivances of the left, nor as the antithesis of blond white purity of nordic fetishism, but as Fred argues here in this column, for what they really are.

    Unfortunately his efforts, and mine, are wasted on the likes of you, at least insofar as you presently are configuring yourself. But somehow I have hope for you.

    Poor Giuseppe, you seem to be a young man thoroughly brainwashed in new religion of Antiracism. This is really the new experiment that has only been going on for only about 53 years. It has utterly failed. This country was founded as a white nation in 1776.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790

    and remained virtually intact until the 1965 immigration act:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

    We went off the rails then. We intend get back on them.

    Your new religion is based on victimhood and you have been taught to believe and regurgitate every instance of past injustice. It is all nonsense.

    You accuse us of victimizing Native Americans. The greater truth is that we dragged them out of the stone age kicking and screaming all the way. We are now providing them with a first world quality of life. However, they claim victimhood because we don’t provide them with equal outcomes, we don’t have to.

    The topic of this article is what to do about the people of Native American decent who are flooding across our borders. They want us to provide them a first world quality of life too, because they cannot provide it for themselves in Latin America. There are now more southern natives (some say over 40 million) than indigenous natives (about 5 million). How are these people victims? We don’t have to provide for them either.

    You say we should return to Europe. Apparently it has escaped your notice that it is also being invaded by non-whites who want us to provide them a quality of life they cannot provide themselves. In fact, we are doomed to become minorities in every culture we have built in this world because the non-whites cannot figure out how to improve their quality of life, other than to elbow their way into white cultures, dump themselves on white men, and demand that we provide for them.

    If we do not do this for them to their satisfaction they scream racism, oppression and white male privilege. Are you white enough to have been tarred with this epithet? Have you been so thoroughly guilt tripped all of your life so as to believe that you world’s premier victimizer? Don’t be, because no one has done more to improve the quality of life for others than white men.

    Non-whites are not victims because we are not providing them with economic party to white men. They victimize the world because they have failed to turn their cultures into first world countries. Failed to become equal partners of the “International Community” ready to help the truly needy.

    We do not have to do this for them. They have to do it for themselves. If there truly is no difference between the races, then these is absolutely no excuse for them not to have done it already. If they can’t do it for themselves, we will not become minorities in our own countries in a futile effort to do it for them.

    We are in an existential battle for the survival of Western Civilization.

    Read More
    • Agree: BenKenobi
    • Replies: @Giuseppe

    Poor Giuseppe, you seem to be a young man thoroughly brainwashed in new religion of Antiracism. This is really the new experiment that has only been going on for only about 53 years. It has utterly failed. This country was founded as a white nation in 1776.
     
    Like much of what else has been written here, you write out of pure suppositions, not facts. I have not been accused of being a young man for many decades. I have been at some pains to show you that though at some points I generally could agree with the critique here of leftism and its view of race, there is third way of looking at race outside of the racist/antiracist dialectic that that is based on facts not fetishes, e.g. Fred's article. I plead guilty to being brainwashed in what you could call a religion, because frankly my brain needed washing badly and continues to need it on an ongoing basis. The Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church is much older than a country founded in 1776 by white people and its roots are in the foundations of the earth. I regard my identity in Christ first, and I look for the eschaton, the consummation of all things when I will stand with the great multitude from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, before the throne. Furthermore, I'm not Italian. I'm also not Catholic.
    , @Corvinus
    "This country was founded as a white nation in 1776."

    Actually, our nation was founded by a host of Europeans.

    "The greater truth is that we dragged them out of the stone age kicking and screaming all the way. We are now providing them with a first world quality of life."

    Perhaps these groups preferred their way of life, rather than be offered "comforts". And who is to say that the European, compared to the Native American, way of life is "first world" or of "better quality"? Sounds like more an opinion.

    "They want us to provide them a first world quality of life too, because they cannot provide it for themselves in Latin America."

    No, they can provide it, just not in the manner they would truly enjoy.

    "In fact, we are doomed to become minorities in every culture we have built in this world..."

    We, as human beings.

    "because the non-whites cannot figure out how to improve their quality of life, other than to elbow their way into white cultures, dump themselves on white men, and demand that we provide for them."

    You seem to forget that it was Europeans who invaded and invited the world, who sought free stuff and gimmedats in the form of raw materials. And, certainly, they provided benefits to the newly conquered.

    "They victimize the world because they have failed to turn their cultures into first world countries."

    Never ceases to amaze me the fetish that some have with race realism, false flags, below replacement, and first worldism.

    "We are in an existential battle for the survival of Western Civilization."

    Except, Americans and Europeans generally do not view matters in those terms, nor should they be virtue signaled into seeing it as a "battle for Western Civilization". Remember, you didn't built it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @SeanG
    The great majority of Mexicans are mestizos--neither purely Indians nor purely Europeans. They are the product of the Spanish conquista.

    You are being kind to simply call it a “conquista”. The Spanish didn’t colonize the north as densely as they did Argentina. They were primarily interested in getting the gold and silver. The majority mestizo population was created when the Spanish enslaved the Amerindians and went about systematically murdering the men and raping the women.

    The Anglos, spearheaded by women, preferred a separation of the races. This is the root of racial resentment. The Spanish considered mestizos somewhat part of the family.

    However, this facilitated the preservation of the North American cultures. There are now over 500 federally recognized tribes and they consider their lands sovereign. They are working very hard to restore their cultures.

    To be a citizen of the Navajo Nation, you must have at least one quarter Navajo blood. To be a citizen of Cherokee Nation you must be descended from someone on the Dawes roll. Most of the other requirements follow bloodlines as well. This conforms to the North American paradigm of sovereign nations based on race.

    Fred is naïve when he states that Mexicans can’t be deported. It was done during the depression.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Repatriation

    My best guess is that after the next collapse, which should destroy the welfare state, Latinos will be flooding out of our inner cities, back to the relative safety of rural Latin America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @J. Reston
    "Conquista" means "conquest". That is what the events have always been termed. Hernan Cortez and company are termed "conquistadores." There's nothing sentimental involved in the use of these terms in relation to those events--neither kind nor unkind. It's the term used by historians. It goes without saying that the process was a violent one, forced upon the natives of the land, and calls forth resistance on the part of those being conquered; that is why the term in question is used..

    The Anglos preferred a calculated genocide ("the only good Indian is a dead Indian").
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Fred, all of your arguments, cherry picked straw men, mean squat. It is not about skin color. Cultures reflect the content of the character of the people who create and maintain them.

    By every politically correct argument, Mexico should be 130 years ahead of the USA. European immigration to Latin American began in 1492. Mexico City was a thriving colonial city when the University of Mexico was established in 1551, 70 years ahead of the Plymouth Colony.

    You and Ron Unz need to come up with a damn good explanation as to why Mexico is not a first world country. You both have failed miserably.

    Both of you have been told time and time again why this is, but you simply refuse to acknowledge the obvious. The most desirable places to live in on this planet are vastly majority white.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Simply Simon
    "You and Ron Unz need to come up with a damn good explanation as to why Mexico is not a first world country. You both have failed miserably."
    Right on. I too will be waiting, in vain most probably, for such a very badly needed explanation. If this is not accomplished, then all their rhetoric is mostly bomb blast. In the Northern Hemisphere, the USA and Canada, why not Mexico?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • From his speaking and tweeting earlier this week, after a briefing from Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen, it is plain that President Donald J. Trump did not know, until Secretary Nielsen enlightened him, that there is no legal way for the U.S.A. to prevent most foreigners from just walking into our country, then settling...
  • @Anonymous
    Even if there were 10 million Central American migrants admitted to the US over the next 10 years it wouldn't really change America. The children of the migrants would assimilate.

    A true believer in the new religion of Antiracism. Let me show you how blacks, who have been here for over a hundred years have assassinated.

    In the ‘60s, 23% of black children were born to unwed mothers, today it’s 75%. The vast majority of black women now use and abuse their children in a deliberate effort to abuse the welfare system. Don’t believe me? Then maybe you’ll believe her.

    These welfare systems exist mostly in white cultures because the average white citizen shoulders the responsibility to pay more into the system than they take from it. Otherwise, it is unsustainable.

    The most prominent of these are Sweden, Germany, the USA and the UK. Apparently it’s escaped you notice that these are the very countries targeted by the migrants.

    They can kiss their welfare systems goodbye.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Introduction For the greater part of a decade the US, the UK and the EU have been carrying out a campaign to undermine and overthrow the Russia government and in particular to oust President Putin. Fundamental issues are at stake including the real possibility of a nuclear war. The most recent western propaganda campaign and...
  • @AnonFromTN
    With all due respect, the author is trying to achieve the impossible: find rational explanation for an irrational behavior. Lately the US and its vassals behave like a cornered rat. The reasons are much greater than Russia. Unipolar world order based on the dominance of the Empire and its faithful vassals is crumbling. The main reason is not Russia, but blinding greed and irrational hubris of the elites, who visibly degenerated after the breakup of the USSR in 1991. The Empire overstretched itself badly militarily, Pentagon contractors are ruining the US economy by their boundless greed, lies of the establishment can no longer be protected in the age of Internet. Thus, the dominant Empire and its goons are losing their positions on all fronts. Both Russia and China would much prefer slow decline of the Empire, particularly very slow loss of dollar value (overall it has to come down about ten-fold to make the US debt manageable). However, cornered rats keep provoking Russia and China in such a way that they have harder and harder time to ignore. A few more provocations like the Skripal affair, which was so ham-handed that the criminals themselves had to change their legend five times in less than a month, and Russia and China might decide that the US must be dealt with like a mad dog: shoot first, ask questions later. That’s the sad state of affairs, exacerbated by glaring intellectual decline of the elites in the US and all its client states.

    There may be a common connection to all of this. I’m no expert, but it may have something with the petro-dollar. Ever since the dollar went off the gold standard, being tied to oil commerce is the only thing backing it.

    Apparently Saddam and Gaddafi threatened this arrangement and look what happened to them. Now maybe Russia is the threat.

    I just read an article about plans to back the dollar with gold again. What will happen if oil is no longer traded in dollars?

    Read More
    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    I am not en economist (thank goodness!), but petro-dollar indeed appears to be the foundation of the current Ponzi scheme. But there is no moving back to gold. The US gold reserves are most likely a myth (or a fraud, if you prefer legal language): the US is very reluctant to return gold to European countries that stupidly gave it to the US for safekeeping, and it is never returned in the form of those gold bricks that actually were deposited, suggesting that they do not exist any more. Last month China introduced the trade in oil futures for yuans (the official name of their currency is renminbi), which is sure to remove the last pillar supporting dollar Ponzi scheme. The US elites got scared and started a trade war with China in response, which the US is almost certain to lose: just go to any US store and try finding something that is not made in China, from socks to computers; your success rate would be remarkably low, and even when you are lucky, the thing in question would be made in Malaysia, Taiwan, Vietnam, Philippines, etc. As Heraclitus said, you cannot enter the same river twice. That is one of the reasons for cornered rat behavior we are witnessing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Earlier by Charlottesville Survivor: THE SYSTEM REPUDIATED: City’s Own Report Confirms Charlottesville Police, Politicians Conspired To Suppress Unite The Right Rally The “Alt Right” is “self-destructing” according to the Daily Beast [Less Than A Year After Charlottesville, the Alt-Right Is Self-Destructing, by Kelly Weill, March 29, 2018]. Slavishly quoting hideous Heidi Beirich of the Southern...
  • @Okechukwu

    If Alt Right is just a nothinghippoburger, why did the Power muster all its resources to shut it down?
     
    I'd contest the degree to which "the power" targeted the alt-right. So far the authorities have been playing footie which them as their members and sympathizers cause havoc and murder people. But that's soon to change. Nevertheless, the world learned to excise this kind of cancer quickly before it metastasizes. Hitler started out with just a few guys.

    Also, if Alt Right is just a bunch of internet trolls, the Power would be far less alarmed. The fact is there is also a core of serious people who deal with real issues.
     
    The alt right are Internet trolls and so are you. We all know you wouldn't say the shit you say here in the real world under your real identity. Virtually 100% of Unz posters fall into the same category. We know the alt right is an almost exclusively Internet phenomenon by virtue of the minuscule numbers that show up at their events. If what they and you are offering is so seductive and so universally attractive, why do you hide?

    There was no danger of Alt Right creating a vast army to take over America or even win elections.
     
    You are correct there.

    But when the movement was on the verge of breaking through at Charlottesville, the power used all its muscle to shut it down.
     
    Break through how? Do you really think an organization that preaches overt white supremacy, naked racism, expulsion of non-whites, the dismemberment of the United States, ethnic cleasing and genocide is ever going to break through? Maybe you should adjust your meds.

    It wasn't that the powers that be shut down the alt right, it was that the alt right tried to transition their hate-mongering from the Internet onto the streets. Ordinary (mostly white) people shut them down, not some vast government action.


    LOL. I’m a race-ist but anti-Nazi. There are plenty of people like Ramzpaul who are ‘race realists’ and don’t go for neo-nazi stuff.
     
    Race realism is a laughable pseudoscience.

    You’re just PC in conflating anything related to White Identity with ‘neo-nazi’.
     
    But white identity is a racist, Neo-Nazi ideology. If you'll notice all white identitarians are racists and Neo-Nazis. So you ought to blame yourselves rather than those who are characterizing you accurately based on your words and deeds.

    No one begrudges the legitimate exercise of white ethic identity. We all love St. Patrick's day and other ethnic white traditions and festivals. No one cries racism when the Irish, Italians, Russians or even the British bask in their unique ethnic heritage. Because those celebrations and traditions aren't tied up with hatred and white supremacy in the way a nebulous white identity is.


    I suppose that makes Jewish nationalists a bunch of ‘neo-nazis’ too. And black nationalists in Africa are a bunch of Black Nazis. That is just dumb.
     
    Jews have been persecuted throughout history. The persecuted embrace nationalism as a defense and coping mechanism. In much the same way there is Irish and Scottish nationalism vis-a-vis England.

    The only black nationalism in Africa took root in those places where minority white regimes terrorized and exploited the people. Otherwise black nationalism doesn't exist in Africa. Africans have no real consciousness of being black or being part of some black bloc. They would only develop those sensibilities if they immigrate to the US, for example.


    As for ethno-states, that has been the dream of anti-imperialists. Ethno-nationalism is about wanting to be free from the Empire. Vietnamese fought for their ethno-state. Algerians kicked out the French. Africans kicked out Brits and French and Belgians. Currently, Europe is being invaded by black demographic imperialists like you who’ve messed up their own nations.
     
    An ahistorical, noncontextual and oversimplification survey of events, which is one of the prime hallmarks of those of your ideological persuasion. It's the reason you guys can't hold a serious discussion. Now, tell me, who would the Americans be fighting for their ethnostate? Who would the British fight? How about the French? Who is the established enemy that these countries have to fight in order to establish their ethnostates? The absurdity of the proposition should dawn on you if you ever ponder that question honestly.

    YOUR kind are demographic ethnic cleansers. You want to invade and demographically take over other nations because (1) you have too many babies in your own nation (2) and your kind turned your own nations to crap.
     
    Now isn't this rich? A beneficiary of of a legacy of real (as distinct from imagined) ethnic cleansing is accusing me of ethnic cleansing. Do you realize that there are more Europeans outside of Europe than in it. They are the only continental population with that distinction. They did not arrive like my parents -- dutifully obeying all the rules and all the laws, being granted permission to enter. No. They entered by force, guns blazing, often killing anything that moved, conducting real, tangible, actual ethnic cleansing.

    Also, you come to white lands and beat up weaker white guys and demand ‘where da white woman at?’ You want to reduce white men into cucky-wuck ‘white boys’ and colonize white wombs to make black babies.
     
    Haha. You have some funny material. Actually, I've been fucking white girls and women most of my life. Guess what, they wanted me more than I wanted them. What are you going to do about it? Why not worry about your own bedroom and your own probable erectile dysfunction?

    Their masters? Shiite! So, you are a troll!! You’re not even an African but some white guy pretending to be some spear-chucker at hippos. Okay, but I’ll play along as if you be what you claim to be.
     
    Russia supports and finances all sorts of fringe movements in the US, dummy. Don't take my word for it, look it up. They set up fake black nationalist organizations and fake gun rights organizations. Their goal is to create chaos. It's not out of the question that Russia created the alt right and/or directs its activities.

    What is ‘sensible’ immigration policy? You mean Paul Ryan and John McCain?
     
    Yes. We need immigration. My wife works in science lab. Virtually all here colleagues are foreign born like herself. You see, Americans want the easy hit and quick money. Who's going to do the critical work that Americans are either too lazy or too greedy to do? In fact we even need illegal immigration because I don't see your type willing to pick lettuce or scrub toilets.

    No, it was perfectly compatible with American values before globalists took over the US.
     
    Nope. America was always a conglomeration of different traditions: poly-European, African, Native American and Hispanic. I bet there are Spanish or Native American street names and other influences throughout your city.

    Also, whites had to keep blacks under control because blacks are stronger, more aggressive, wilder, and stuff.
     
    You are in the grip of 19th century pseudo-"science."

    As for blacks, ever since they were allowed to run free, they turned cities like Detroit, Baltimore, S. Louis, South Side of Chicago, and etc. Blacks got the bongo gene that is bad for civilization.
     
    This is some serious trolling. See, you people got into trouble when you abandoned your keyboards and echo-chambers and tried to take this kind of nonsense into the street. By all means, stay anonymous and stick to your keyboard. Don't let it out of your sight. Don't even think about leaving your house with this shit.

    No, Alt Right is not about white victimhood.
     
    Yes it is. The alt-right are grievance mongers and losers. Imagine being white in America (or anywhere in the world because there's even white privilege in non-white countries) and having everything teed up for you and still failing miserably. That's what's at the root of their angst and their frustration. They know they have every advantage by virtue of being white. Yet they see people like me not similarly advantaged who are lapping them, outperforming them, more successful than them. So they lash out. I'm the son of immigrants who came here with virtually nothing. I competed against white people whose families had built up wealth and resources for generations, people whose white skin gave them instant access to a vast range of opportunities, and I came out on top.

    Also, while it’s true that most of the successful people in America are white, they don’t care about white people, culture, or identity. Bill Gates and Tim Cook don’t give a crap about whites.
     
    In other words, they don't think like you. They have to be racist scumbags to be white in your eyes. Well, I'm afraid your criteria for being white represents too heavy a burden for any intelligent, decent and rational white person to bear. So of course you will continue to fail and fail and fail.

    But why did your African parents leave their own people/nation and decide to move to a nation founded and built by whites?
     
    Why did your people come to America? If whites have a magic wand that makes everything wonderful, why couldn't they make it work in Europe, which was REALLY built by whites, unlike America.

    And if you’re into African identity, why don’t you go back to Africa? We know why,and there is a recognizable pattern.
     
    Think for a moment. How am I going to have an African identity having been born and raised in America. Do you have a Polish or Irish identity?

    White people do things better, and blacks want to leech off whites.
     
    Yet it's whites that have been leeching off blacks for hundreds of years.

    White people do some things well and other things terribly. In the last few hundred years white people became very technologically oriented and they developed some great technology. But no greater than those that came before them without whose influence they might still be dumping feces out of windows and going lifetimes without ever bathing. Conversely, white people have been a deeply exploitative, genocidal and ruinous force that has decimated entire continents, including Europe itself.

    Your ignorance of this country is astounding. It was founded on white identity.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790

    and remained virtually intact until the 1965 immigration act:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

    At that time it was

    84% white.

    11% black – because Lincoln didn’t live long enough to complete his plan to relocate blacks out of the country. The Civil War wasn’t fought in order to free the slaves. It was fought to stop traitorous white agribusiness from continuing to infest this country with blacks.

    4% Hispanic – either because we didn’t run them out of the country sufficiently in the first place or because they kept coming back. Probably both.

    1% other – because of the effectiveness of the 1790 immigration policy.

    Now you can rant all you like about past injustice, but this is why this country became as great as it is, and provided the average American with the highest quality of life in the history of the world. It has been declining since 1965. I know, I’m a boomer.

    All of the straw men you raised mean squat; obliterated by the fact that not only have blacks refused to leave, but you keep coming ..and keep coming ..and keep coming ..and keep coming ..and keep coming ..and keep coming. We are doomed to become minorities in all white cultures because of this.

    The reason for this is that you black men provide your people with the lowest quality of life on the planet. All of my life it’s been feed the poor starving Africans. According to a black author, Gwen Richardson, less than 1% of the jobs held by blacks in this country are created by blacks. Show me one country in the entire world where you black men are providing enough jobs for your own people.

    Spare me the litany of past injustice. The greater truth is that for 400 years white men have been showing you how it’s done. You’re just not getting it. The only thing you’ve figured out to do is dump yourselves on white men and demand that we provide it for you. If we do not do this for you to your satisfaction, you scream racism, oppression, marginalization, disenfranchisement and white male privilege.

    Until you black men provide your people with an equal quality of life as we do ours, you have no business thinking of yourselves as the equals of white men. Until you black men actually create a first world country in Africa, you have no business thinking of yourselves as men. And that’s what you blacks should be focusing on. Making Africa great.

    Follow the link to my site. Read the post “On Race” a commenter named Dimitrius Rex was a black nationalist who wanted a separate black America. We got along just fine. To my mind, blacks are the most racist people in this country.

    Is your name really Okechukwu? If not, who are you to cast stones?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    The Civil War wasn’t fought in order to free the slaves. It was fought to stop traitorous white agribusiness from continuing to infest this country with blacks.
     
    Then the "winning" side lost.

    The reason for this is that you black men provide your people with the lowest quality of life on the planet.
     
    On the other hand, sitting around under a shade tree drinking tea with your homeboys while your womenfolk do all the productive work would be seen as a very high standard of living by some. Some here, even.

    Spare me the litany of past injustice. The greater truth is that for 400 years white men have been showing you how it’s done.
     
    Change "400" to "70" and "white men" to "Jews", and the "you" that follows could apply just as easily to Palestinian Arabs. But, boy, would you get a different reaction here!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Planning for a show-down, a column of 1,500 Central Americans, largely from Honduras, has been beating a path to the Mexican-American border. Some report that the column has been halted; others dispute that. Interviewed by Reuters in Mexico, a sojourning mother of seven—what are the chances none is an MS13 gangster?—signaled her intention to proceed...
  • @TT
    The white Europeans invaded & exterminated the red indians to rob their entire ancester land, invaded Mexico to took vast swath of land incl Texas, turned on all their colonial masters and that's what become Great USA today.

    So literally these new migrants aspired to join the glory are no different from existing murkans illegally squatting on invaded lands, except they are more civilized without using violent to gain entry.

    US is larger than China & India, sure it can absorb another billion migrants to make America great again. With 1.4B people & US superior technology will once again propel US to indisputable Lord of the World, supercharging the ruling 1% richest with plenty of cheap labour to out do China.

    Welcome to the new NWO Disneyland of the West.

    Your arguments are based on an entirely false premise. It is not a matter of geographical luck, a propositional nation or magic dirt. Cultures reflect the content of the character of the people who create and maintain them.

    These migrants are coming here for one reason only. Because this is where the white men are. If there were no white men here, they wouldn’t be coming; and if they tried this before white men seized control, the locals would have killed them.

    It is not enough that we dragged them out of the stone age, kicking and screaming all the way. They want a first world quality of life. They cannot provide this for themselves, and there are not white men down there to provide it for them.

    The only thing they have figured out to do is elbow their way into this country, dump themselves on white men here and demand that we provide it for them. If we do not do this for them to their satisfaction, they scream racism, oppression and white male privilege.

    However, when this country become minority white, there won’t be enough of us to provide jobs, welfare, food stamps, housing and healthcare for them here either.

    Now want do think will happen first?

    1. The globalists plan to make collectivists the majority so they can use democracy to seize control and vote themselves a license to steal as in Venezuela and South African.

    2. The massive welfare state we are running will collapse under the strain so that there will be no real wealth to redistribute.

    It’s a horse race. Either way, it will not end well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TT

    However, when this country become minority white, there won’t be enough of us to provide jobs, welfare, food stamps, housing and healthcare for them here either.
     
    Just been sarcastic over US ridiculous migrant policy & border control.

    If US whites become minority, they will move further up to Canada, then cross the Atlantic ocean to West Europe, but to their great dismay to find Muslim refugees everywhere. There aren't enough white men anymore to feed them, so they will return to their homeland as sane East Europe & Russia will never let them in.

    What's wrong with US & West Europe now, all are self inflicting destruction with absurd immigration policy? Its just incomprehensible.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Earlier by Charlottesville Survivor: THE SYSTEM REPUDIATED: City’s Own Report Confirms Charlottesville Police, Politicians Conspired To Suppress Unite The Right Rally The “Alt Right” is “self-destructing” according to the Daily Beast [Less Than A Year After Charlottesville, the Alt-Right Is Self-Destructing, by Kelly Weill, March 29, 2018]. Slavishly quoting hideous Heidi Beirich of the Southern...
  • @AaronB
    To expand on this, logic is right now acting as a filter and screen on your brain, preventing you from seeing all sorts of things that you would naturally see, literally making white people stupid and depressing tyour cognitive functions as well as depressing you emotionally.

    Probably the only you need to "do"is remove this logical filter - you will begin to "notice" all sorts if things you can't now.

    In other words, you can't consciously craft an approach in a positive manner using principles and the like - that's the problem.

    As hard as it may seem, you actually have to stop doing something rather than start doing something. You have to remove a cognitive filter rather than add any idea or principle.

    It's a negative process - the problem is that our culture always encourages positive action, adding principles and ideas rather than subtracting them.

    Healthy, adaptive living is a genuine interaction with reality - the logical filter has hidden too much of reality from view, severing this connection.

    So instead of once more trying to "do" something positive and adding an idea that you then apply - merely remove the logical filter which is depressing you cognitively.

    What will emerge after that will be based on an interaction with reality and a newfound ability to "see" - the precise form it will take cannot be predicted.

    Such loss of control is also frightening to Westerners, who as FKAmax has shown, seem prone to anxiety - which is why they developed such an iron system of control through science and logic.

    AaronB, I may have been a little harsh and I think you mean well, but this sounds like leftist postmodernism. Kant argued that the human mind cannot understand, nor even perceive reality correctly. Therefore, the human mind should dictate reality. It’ absurd. It is all about what you feel.
    Is this where you are coming from?

    You can listen to an audiobook Explaining Postmodernism narrated by the author here:

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    No, rather the opposite perspective. It's true that everything we see is a dream and an illusion, but that does not mean there is no reality out there or that we can wake up from the dream or construct our own reality .

    What it does mean is that the categories of our mind should not be taken very seriously. To elevate realism and logic to a preeminent position and think the dream image it shows is anything more than a useful illusion that may help in some circumstances is to give the human mind a power that kant showed itt does not and cannot have (Darwin showed the same thing - but our culture is anything but consistent)

    Taking logic very seriously is the belief that our minds are the final arbiters of reality - the idea that just because our logic can't see it isn't real - when Kant showed how limited our logic is - is to believe that our minds can actually construct reality. It is insane self-worship.

    When you accept logic is a limited tool and does not actually give you access to reality, you can interact with an essentially unknowable reality in other ways that are just as essential to human well being.

    In other words, nothing we see is finally real - not logic, nor anything else. They are all useful tools to navigate an essentially unknowable reality by beings that are trapped in mystery. When used as tools, they can be helpful. When one tool is taken to give access to reality, then all other useful tools will be discarded even though they may be essential to our flourishing.

    I am not suggesting we replace logical beliefs with non rational beliefs - I am saying we should get rid of beliefs altogether and realize all our concepts and ways of of dealing with the world are tools and that the precise way therefore ultimate reality cannot be known by us.

    This way, you can allow unknowable reality to interact with your cognitive structure in all the rich and manifold ways it is capable of including imagination and poetry and emotion and hints and vague suggestions that constitute helpful hints to navigate life without ever thinking that what you perceive is anything other than an echo of an unknowable reality. By privileging logic above all else, you restrict your cognitive range and turn a rich contact with an unknowable reality into a narrow and sterile one. You cut off connection with mystery - which simply means you cut off contact with all sources of experience and all ways of navigating the world that cannot be understood by one narrow piece of cognitive apparatus.

    Sorry if none this makes sense. Perhaps it's not meant to :)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @AaronB
    It's somewhat self-defeating to try and consciously devise a better approach when our current predicament is the result of an over-reliance on conscious approaches in general.

    However, a few points can be briefly sketched perhaps through the use of examples.

    Let's take Japan again as a useful case example. The Japanese believe in this nebulous concept called "spirit" - basically they believe that effort and determination can overcome all obstacles. Obviously they take it too far but at the same time this belief motivates the entire nation to make a maximum effort in everything they do, no matter how trivial. The Japanese economic "miracle" is nothing less than this.

    Now contrast this with the fatalism and despair-inducing belief in genetic determinism that afflicts us. Steve Sailor with an ironic and sardonic smile will tell that your position in the world is an ineffable emanation of your genetic potential there is little you can do to affect.

    Meanwhile Asians and Jews with their irrational belief in non genetic factors like "spirit" are laughing at you and eating your lunch as they just work harder than you despite having fewer high IQ people than you in America - but you have Steve Sailers and John Derbyshire sardonic smile to comfort you as you slide comfortably into oblivion.

    Take the concept of nation or prople. It's irrational and nebulous and cannot be seen or defined clearly or detected by scientific instruments - naturally therefore white hyper-rationality destroys belief in it and make everyone into selfish individualists. Everyone else, meanwhile, laughs at us as they act collectively to promote group interests on the basis of belief in this utterly non rational entity.

    Clearly, like dark matter and gravity, certain things cannot be seen or detected but belief in them is absolutely necessary if humans are to successfully navigate their way through the world and if the equation so are going to add up. Somehow, whites can only see this when it applies to physics, not human life.

    Because hyper rationality has literally
    made whites stupid - depressed their cognitive function to the point where they can't think clearly.

    The basic difference in approach is - develop an appreciation for non rational factors, burst free of the prison house of logic and learn to use it as a tool again only, start believing in things you can't prove through logic or detect through scientific instruments but seem indicated by life and circumstances, relearn to be comfortable with fuzzy and vague concepts and ideas that nevertheless have tremendous impact and stop insisting on the stupid Descartian "simple, clear" ideas as the only ones worth focusing on. Finally, reconstitute an inherited tradition based on appreciation for the non rational

    Simple, no?

    This is why the situation is hopeless - only collapse and humiliation will lead to the massive shift in course needed, and to the current system being discredited.

    If this is an example of what you call “weaponized logic” you just fell flat on your face.

    Let’s take Japan again as a useful case example. The Japanese believe in this nebulous concept called “spirit” – basically they believe that effort and determination can overcome all obstacles. Obviously they take it too far but at the same time this belief motivates the entire nation to make a maximum effort in everything they do, no matter how trivial. The Japanese economic “miracle” is nothing less than this.

    The Japanese miracle exists because white men allowed them to manufacturer products, almost all invented by white men, for white consumerism. This is true for all Asian Tigers.

    Now contrast this with the fatalism and despair-inducing belief in genetic determinism that afflicts us. Steve Sailor with an ironic and sardonic smile will tell that your position in the world is an ineffable emanation of your genetic potential there is little you can do to affect.

    Pure bullshit. There is no despair. Again, whites are optimistic innovators; Asians, copiers.

    Take the concept of nation or prople. It’s irrational and nebulous and cannot be seen or defined clearly or detected by scientific instruments – naturally therefore white hyper-rationality destroys belief in it and make everyone into selfish individualists. Everyone else, meanwhile, laughs at us as they act collectively to promote group interests on the basis of belief in this utterly non rational entity.

    Pure nonsense. It is the unselfish global collectivists who are causing this because of an irrational belief in the new religion of Antiracism. It’s us individualistic, selfish white nationalists who are fighting to keep our culture intact.

    Your entire argument is irrational. Logic demonstrates that all white cultures are preferable to non-white cultures. It can be measured qualitatively, we have the higher standards of living. It can be measured quantitatively, people are voting with their feet. So many of the people in the world would prefer to live in white cultures than their own that I believe it’s the vast majority.

    It is the irrational belief in Antiracism that is preventing us from doing anything about it. Every time one of us tries to prevent the destruction of Western Civilization, we are quickly shouted down as racists.

    However, you are correct in one point. Only an economic collapse will break this mass insanity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    You should keep on telling yourself this, change nothing, and learn from no one. You're number one. Remember that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The world is getting harder to understand. Although science has never been more successful at revealing the contours of the world – where we came from, what kind of creature we are, which forces govern the objects around us – the difficulty of processing new information continues to grow. Science is not the accumulation of...
  • No mr. Anomaly we don’t need each other. Most of us on the alt-Right are simply independent minded white men who want to be left alone to go about our business. Live and let live kinda thing.

    But the Leftists won’t leave us alone. They have become ultra collectivists who are determined to dictate to us how to live, what to say and what to think. Apparently part of a globalist agenda.

    A tiny fraction of us have bothered to speak up about it. However, I view traitorous whites as a bigger problem than Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Earlier by Charlottesville Survivor: THE SYSTEM REPUDIATED: City’s Own Report Confirms Charlottesville Police, Politicians Conspired To Suppress Unite The Right Rally The “Alt Right” is “self-destructing” according to the Daily Beast [Less Than A Year After Charlottesville, the Alt-Right Is Self-Destructing, by Kelly Weill, March 29, 2018]. Slavishly quoting hideous Heidi Beirich of the Southern...
  • @Jason Liu
    Being intimidated, deplatformed or harassed out of public view counts as losing. You can't just say "we wouldn't be losing if our opposition didn't exist!"

    And there IS a lot of infighting and poor decision making among the alt-right. Nobody made that fat neckbeard sleep with his mother-in-law, or whatever. It's kinda like the old Stormfront people. Individually they might be tougher than the average Antifa, but as a whole they lose because they can't organize for shit.

    This is consistent with my new paradigm. I now define the Left as collectivist and the Right as individualist.

    Collectivists are more socially active and their extremists are determined to dictate to all of us how to live, what to say and what to think. They have captured the social apparatus.

    The alt-Right is overly represented with the stereotypical individualistic white male who has a live and let live attitude. I would place classical liberals here. We won’t rise to collective behavior until absolutely necessary. That time is fast approaching.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @AndrewR
    "Anti-racism" is literally no different than any other religion/ideology. History, and current events, shows us that many, many, many humans have an astounding, seemingly boundless capacity to kill and die for even the most irrational belief systems. The death tolls from Islam, Christianity, national socialism and communism number arguably in the hundreds of millions. The death toll of "anti-racism" is currently a drop in the bucket compared to what it will likely turn out to be.

    AndrewR, I can’t figure out where you are coming from. You are correct when you say:

    History, and current events, shows us that many, many, many humans have an astounding, seemingly boundless capacity to kill and die for even the most irrational belief systems.

    That is why I call Antiracism a religion. It is an irrational belief that there is absolutely no difference between the races. It is not about skin color, it is about the vastly different cultures we create.

    You are also correct when you say:

    The death toll of “anti-racism” is currently a drop in the bucket compared to what it will likely turn out to be.

    Forcing people who do not want to live together, to live together, is a very bad idea. There are currently organized invasions of all white cultures. The majority of these people are hostile to whites and our culture, especially Muslims. It will turn out to be very bloody indeed.

    The simple proposition is that we will all be happier and safer living with our own people in our own cultures. Yet you seem to oppose this. Why?

    Read More
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    Why do you think I oppose people living with their own people?

    The problem isn't so much the mixing of different peoples. The main problem is traitorous whites (and (((fellow whites)))) who insist on turning whites into second-class citizens everywhere on earth. Having a few Muslims or whatever other groups in our society isn't necessarily so bad as long as they understand that they have to adapt to us and our values, not the other way around. That they can't expect special treatment and they can't disparage the host population in a chauvinistic way. Of course, the left insists that holding minorities to any sort of standards is "racist."

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Bill TotenWeiss

    Eventually they are going to have to allow whites to have a voice
     
    Congress is 80% white, my dude.

    But keep planning for that CIVIL WAR that you would lose instantly.

    Apparently you have a comprehension problem. No one here is talking about white nationalists starting a civil war. The discussion is how to survive the civil unrest that will follow an economic collapse.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Mark, that troll doesn't care what's being said. His responses are always off-topic. Ignore him and he'll go away.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @AndrewR
    Good question. I've spent a lot of time pondering this myself. I'm not really imaginative enough to sketch out a detailed, plausible scenario, but I can point out some places to start thinking.

    What side will cops and the military take? I imagine that as long as their paychecks aren't bouncing, virtually all will do as told. We saw in Charlottesville how the cops all chose to enforce the most blatantly unconstitutional and illegal orders.

    Foreign powers: a real civil war in the US would obviously draw the whole world's attention and have them supporting and supplying different factions. We would even see actual invasions if the US military became dysfunctional enough.

    Fault lines: race would be a major one of course but the primary combatants on both main sides would be whites. I think there are probably millions of whites who would, if they could, happily try to kill anyone whom they deemed to be "Nazis," and, as is known by anyone who doesn't live in a cave, the left considers anyone who doesn't buy into explicitly anti-white ideology to be "Nazis." There will be a lot of "friendly fire" as opportunistic black thugs kill the idiot white leftists who worship them.

    I agree with most of what you said, but I think white cohesion will be a lot stronger than you think.

    All of my life there has been a phenomenon called white flight. Whites fleeing to more lily white communities when browns move in. It is my perception that most of the PC white elites are living in such communities.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/life/caixin/2015/07/silicon_valley_white_asian_divide_why_families_self_segregate_and_what_can.html

    This will intensify when you think your life is at stake. So I think that the white response will be mostly defensive in nature.

    The silver lining is that should this spiral into an all out race war, the new religion of Antiracism will be crushed forever.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Just like they are doing in South Africa. Oh wait.

    The Alt-Right: realism on the characteristics of every race except themselves.
    , @AndrewR
    "Anti-racism" is literally no different than any other religion/ideology. History, and current events, shows us that many, many, many humans have an astounding, seemingly boundless capacity to kill and die for even the most irrational belief systems. The death tolls from Islam, Christianity, national socialism and communism number arguably in the hundreds of millions. The death toll of "anti-racism" is currently a drop in the bucket compared to what it will likely turn out to be.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "Pope Declares No Hell?" So ran the riveting headline on the Drudge Report of Holy Thursday. Drudge quoted this exchange, published in La Repubblica, between Pope Francis and his atheist friend, journalist Eugenio Scalfari. Scalfari: "What about bad souls? Where are they punished?" Bad souls "are not punished," Pope Francis is quoted, "those who do...
  • None of you commenters seem to understand the Catholic religion. It is all about having your sins forgiven.

    I was taught in catechism that every human soul was bound straight for hell unless saved by the church. Not for anything we did, but for what Adam and Eve did: original sin, the fall of mankind.

    The sacraments of Baptism, Confirmation and the Eucharist were absolutely necessary to be forgiven Adam and Eves sins; Confession, Absolution and Last Rights to be forgiven your own. Only the church and the priests can administer them.

    This is basically a Jewish con game. A protection racket. We’ll save you from a fate worse than death. We’ll save you from our God who wants to cast you into a lake of fire and cause you to suffer the horrors of being alive, every second of your existence…. For eternity. All you gotta do is put a little money in the collection plate.

    Will simply the threat of oblivion be enough to keep the money flowing?

    Read More
    • Agree: Rurik
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • So Congress finally passed a budget. It’s a blockbuster—$1.3 trillion, or around four thousand dollars for every man, woman, and child in the U.S.A. Basically it is a compound made up of (a) anything Leftist Democrats could wish for, and (b) anything that the Jeb Bush wing of the Republican Party, and that wing’s Big...
  • @Allan
    "Politics is downstream from culture," and I am inclined to agree. So, what culture is "White Nationalism"? Is it trailer park culture? Flat Earth culture? Is it the Bellamy salute given while praying to a flag? Is the phrase a trademark? Do we need to write ™ or ® after it?

    So, what culture is “White Nationalism”?

    This was defined by our founding fathers in 1790 as “free White persons of good character”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790

    and remained virtually intact until the 1965 immigration act:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The immigration debate seems to have gone crazy. President Obama’s widely popular Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, which offered some 750,000 young immigrants brought to the United States as children a temporary reprieve from deportation, is ending... except it isn’t... except it is... President Trump claims to support it but ordered its...
  • Hey Aviva, please comment on this article if you have any integrity at all.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-says-flood-of-african-migrants-worse-than-sinai-terrorists/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Crime statistics mean very little. White men have a history of violence, which will become apparent if this invasion continues. However, only white men can create the kind of cultures most people want to live in, so the invasions of all white cultures will continue until force is used.

    Otherwise, South Africa will be our fate. White job creation caused migrants to swell the population by a factor of 10. They used democracy to turn the white culture into their culture, typified by the ANC. Now, they are threatening to use democracy to vote themselves a license to steal, confiscation of land without compensation. Will the whites fight or flee?

    Why can’t you morons get it through your heads that only white men can create and maintain the values of Western Civilization.

    Read More
    • Replies: @HogHappenin
    When we become Zionist lackeys, killing and dying for the Zionist Jews who espouse the (now (in)famous) "invade the world invite the world" policy for whitey (and extreme ethno-centrism for themselves in Israel), we are as much to be blamed for this.

    Unless we are able to pry our collective selves out of this zombified Zionist worship, this will never stop. The Zionists use whitey as their toolkit to shape the world as per their liking and in return we are "enriched" with diversity, many a times from the very nations we've helped them destroy.

    Now that they are aching for a war with Christian Russia, I think the days of whitey and indeed many people are numbered. Which is why I've left this madhouse circus long back since I don't think it's possible to re-program people's mind which has been poisoned by such crap as Diversity and the notion of American "exceptionalism" pushed by the same bunch who pretends to be Leftist and right ones to fools dumb cattle like us.

    Nonetheless, I hope you get what you strive for! I hope and pray to at least see it within our lifetimes!

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Up until, or on the day, a predictable calamity unfolds in South Africa, you still find Western Media insisting that, No, there's no racial component to the butchering of thousands of white rural folks in ways that would make Shaka Zulu proud. No, the mutilated, tortured, white bodies of Boer and British men, women and...
  • I was hoping for more insight about how this developed. My limited understanding of how South Africa evolved is this:

    Whites, mainly Boers, developed mostly unoccupied, and in some cases, marginal land. The 7 major indigenous tribes kept their homelands and numbered about 5 million.

    As whites created an economy and jobs, migrants from all over Africa flooded in, swelling the population to over 50 million. They were not enslaved.

    This created the infamous townships intended the keep the migrants from swamping both the white communities and the indigenous homelands. This was the main purpose of apartheid, the preservation of traditional cultures: multiculturalism

    The ANC was voted into power by the people of these townships because they are now the majority. They have no traditional claims to the land. They were not brought there against their will. They were not genocided.

    They want what they came for, a better quality of life. First, they were furious at whites because whites improved their life only marginally. Otherwise they would have returned home. Then they were furious at the ANC because it is was even worse. Now they are desperately grabbing for everything they can get.

    Please forgive my bias and laziness, but most of what I have read drips with white guilt tripping. Feel free to enlighten me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Can corporate America be forced to end its diversity obsession? Abolishing racial and ethnic preferences has proven difficult enough in higher education and government employment but stopping private businesses from “trying to look like America” seems nearly impossible given their freedom to recruit whoever they want (save, of course, hiring only white males). Are airline...
  • @Joe Wong
    The author is a White propagandist trolling NRA style strawman fallacy to expand more discrimination against minorities.

    The American corporations are dominated by the White at the top and the diversity only happens at the bottom echelon. If the performance of the American corporations is appalling, it is the result of incompetence at the top and the top is pocketing too much from the corporations for themselves instead of reinvesting in their corporations to nurture it and grow it.

    The main culprit suffocating the American corporations is the American elite which has a mindset belonging to the past, stalled in the old days of colonialism and constrained by the zero-sum cold war mentality, they are barring FDI (money and brain) left and right from aboard for their cult like and regressive ideological wars.

    Americans need to realize that no fresh investments like no fresh blood and air to the brain, it will decay and die. Diversity is not the cause of American corporation poor performance, but the American laws, regulations and toxic ideological political environment is, they are like clamps chocking off fresh blood to the brain.

    What you claim is injustice is caused by the fact that for all intent and purposes only white men create jobs for anyone in this country. White men CREATE the businesses, jobs and wealth. The white male working class think that too many of these white elites are all too willing to replace them with cheaper non-white-male labor.

    White females won’t shut up about the fact that less than 5% of CEOs are women. If women had created an equal share of the businesses and jobs then they would be equally represented in management because they would be CEOs of their own companies.

    A black author asserts that less than 1% of the jobs held by blacks in this country are created by blacks. Show me one country in the entire world where blacks create enough jobs for their own.

    People of native American descent are flooding across our borders because this is where the white men are. There are now more southern natives “squatting” in the USA than there are indigenous natives. Had they tried this before white men seized control, the locals would have killed them.

    We are doomed to become minorities in our own cultures because the non-white races cannot figure out how to improve their quality of life other than elbow their way into white countries, dump themselves on white men demand that we provide them a quality of life they cannot provide themselves. If we do not do this for them to their satisfaction, they scream racism, oppression, marginalization and white male privilege.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Russ
    Quite so. Note also how we _never_ see a market attacked by an all-female or an all-black firm. If Diversity Inc is anything other than white male dilution, wouldn't the challengers at least occasionally band together to display their bona fides?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Look, I realize Elon Musk is really cool and all, but this latest is just not that significant. The Falcon Heavy can carry 63 tons into orbit - but only if the rocket isn't reused. If it is, it's just a sad 8 tons [for GTO launches]. That already rules out commercial applications involving very...
  • I believe the first off-world colony should be in earth orbit. The IIS should be re-tasked to be a permanent colony, tourist hotel and space port. All of the commercial pieces are in place, including Bigelow modules with expansion capabilities.

    Very large shuttles could be assembled here for colonizing the rest of the solar system. Another primary goal is to become totally self-sustaining, and it can be more easily supported from Earth until it does.

    This means that the permanent colonists will have to commit to a zero-G life style. I am optimistic that great evolutionary strides will be made in zero-G. People can essentially fly and there is lots of room to grow out there.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Just when you thought the corporatocracy couldn't possibly get more creepily Orwellian, the Twitter Corporation starts sending out emails advising that they "have reason to believe" we have "followed, retweeted," or "liked the content of" an account "connected to a propaganda effort by a Russia government-linked organization known as the Internet Research Agency." While it's...
  • Mr. Hopkins. While I wholeheartedly support your position, I have to disagree on two points.

    First, I don’t think the new nationalism, or populism (a desperate effort to ridicule it) is doomed to fail. Momentum is rapidly growing all over the world.

    Second, you assume that things will continue to limp along the way they have been. This is the least likely scenario. There are many step functions that can occur that no one, not even the globalists, can control. They include:

    1. A total global economic collapse will divest the elite of their wealth, and foment civil wars.

    2. The Islamic armies that are currently invading the West will soon deem it necessary to coordinate their violence.

    The West has been though it all before. Freedom loving white men will again rise to the challenge and take back our culture.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • It is usual to distinguish between biological and machine intelligence, and for good reason: organisms have interacted with the world for millennia and survived, machines are a recent human construction, and until recently there was no reason to consider them capable of intelligent behaviour. Computers changed the picture somewhat, but until very recently artificial intelligence...
  • Humans will integrate with machines and possess the best of both worlds. Work it already progressing towards this union.

    This union will provide a positive feedback loop than should accelerate human evolution to the next level. My favorite, “Star Trek: The Motion Picture”, discusses this concept.

    There is no such thing as artificial intelligence. It is all part of a natural progression.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong

    Humans will integrate with machines and possess the best of both worlds. Work it already progressing towards this union.
     
    The product is called the Borg.
    , @mobi

    Humans will integrate with machines and possess the best of both worlds. Work it already progressing towards this union.
     
    One would hope so. Of course, the fear is that, long before such a clumsy process bears fruit, there will prove to be far too little in it for the machines
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A burly unattractive woman in her late fifties or sixties, dyed hair, pearl laces around wrinkled neck, tearfully relating a story of unwanted sexual attention that maybe occurred many years ago, presents a most embarrassing sight. Perhaps once Beverly Young Nelson was young and pretty, and could awake passion in a man’s loins, but that...
  • Your only claim to immortality is to live on though your children. Your true soul, your true self are your genes. These genes are passed from body to body in a continuous existence that reaches all of the way back to the beginning of life on this planet. We are, all of us – every living thing, over 3.5 billion years old.

    To walk this world as a white man again requires white women. No one has contributed more to improve the quality of life for others than white men. The white male bashing we are being subjected to is simply jealousy and envy.

    The bitchiness of so many white women is due to the fact that white men have spoiled them rotten. How to solve this problem requires more space than this comment allows, but solve it we must.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous

    The white male bashing we are being subjected to is simply jealousy and envy.
     
    Partially true, I agree.

    But, given the spiritual losers the whites are, the jealousy and envy is not too high :D

    Believe me, the guys who maintain the following website, are doing humanity a great favour.

    http://www.badnewsaboutchristianity.com/db0_onegod.htm

    http://www.badnewsaboutchristianity.com/m01_religion.htm
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Not so long ago, mere mention of the deliberate murder of whites in South Africa—country folk and commercial farmers, in particular—was called "racist." "Raaacist!" the media collective brayed when candidate Trump retweeted a related "white genocide" hashtag. It's still "racist" to suggest that the butchering of these whites, almost daily, in ways that beggar belief,...
  • @dc.sunsets
    Don't bother replying to leftist self-haters. Theirs is a mental affliction, so you're essentially arguing with a schizophrenic.

    All we await is for the 50 year delusion that seized First World whites (of all nationalities) to reach its natural reversal.

    It won't matter if the USA is majority minority or if Europe is 15% African, there will still be ample numbers of high capability whites to invest their ingenuity into expelling those who are determined to harm them.

    Changes to collective moral calculus occur frequently throughout history. When whites embrace a belief that their children's future depends on wiping out those who have had a history of attacking them (and oh boy do we already have that precondition), it won't remotely be a fair fight.

    Agree. The new religion of anti-racism is on the wane due to the overt hyper-racism of non-whites, especially blacks. It’s just a matter of time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I'd like to better understand the conservative media's orgy over Harvey Weinstein, the disgraced and disgraceful Hollywood film producer and studio executive who used his power over decades to have his way with starlets. To listen to conservative talkers, the women affronted or assaulted by Weinstein were all Shakespearean talent in the making—female clones of...
  • Women have been sexually exploiting Men for a living for 5 million years. Women’s price for sex has always been that men provision them. There is nothing wrong with this. It helped shaped both human physical and cultural evolution and we might have gone extinct without it.

    The thing that interests me is, why now. The casting couch has been a stereotype all of my life. Why the piling on at this time?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    The casting couch has been a stereotype all of my life. Why the piling on at this time?
     
    perhaps because of The Trumpening

    perhaps now that Trump is in DC, there are forces at work that have bristled under the excruciatingly dishonest levels of hypocrisy coming out of the leftisphere.

    accusing Trump of being disrespectful to women, as they rape women and girls wholesale, and the entire leftist power structure always looks the other way, so long as the rapist is a leftist himself, and will use his power for the leftist agenda.

    so these serial predators like Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein all get a pass from the feminists and liberal, progressives, so long as they assist with The Agenda to destroy Western Civilization, (and the people who created it ; ).
    As long as Bill Clinton hails the day when whites will be a minority in this country, (to the cheers of liberal college students), he can rape women all day long. He can sexually harass, as the most powerful man in the world, powerless girls in the White House, and all to a thunderous silence from the entire leftist, progressive (hypocritical / hatred-consumed) power structure. Because he works towards their agenda. [the same agenda, BTW - that destroyed S. Africa and Rhodesia]

    But for a man like Trump, who seems to have raised daughters who respect themselves, and seem to conduct themselves with a certain dignity- that isn't what's important. What's important is what is always important...

    THE AGENDA

    the relentless, drum-beating agenda to destroy Western values. To eviscerate the culture of 1950s America (with virtues like honor and temperance) once and for all, and replace it with a septic tank value system, where self-respect is replaced with self-loathing. Where dignity and femininity is replace with twerking with your tongue out. Where Hollywood starlets howl about how "nasty" they are, as if being a skank is a moral badge of feminine honor.

    That's what's going on here. We're in the trenches of the cold culture war, turned hot culture war.

    They wanted to destroy Trump and the deplorables with shrieking about how Trump was disrespectful to women. But now the cover of the giant septic tank known as Hollywood has been lifted off, for all the world to gasp at the slithering creatures and whiff the terrible stench.

    I wonder if it's a kind of payback time for Hillary and her army of morally preening orcs, feasting on the flesh of young women, and smacking their liver lips with anticipation of the next young shiksa to walk though that hotel room door.

    I only hope we get an investigation into Pizzagate next, with perhaps a nice expose' of Jeffrey Epstein's Child Rape Island, and all those liberal, progressive morally preening men who take so many trips there.

    this might just be all a sign of the great Trumpening
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Newsweek recently sounded the alarm in a long-form piece on what they view as a troubling new trend: Sixty years after Brown vs. Board, forty years after the end of busing, it appears that all the social engineering in the world can't make our multicultural dreams come true: Economist Tyler Cowen, who is a conservative,...
  • Blacks threw the whole idea of a colorblind society right out the window immediately following the Civil Rights movement with their concept of affirmative action. They now demand we notice their skin color and give them preferential treatment in all things because of it. The rationale was that it would facilitate them becoming fully enfranchised citizens of this county, by contributing equally to it. They have failed to deliver on that promise.

    Instead, they have focused on being appropriately black. They have created a culture that is intended to be not just different than the white culture, it is anti-white; and it is almost entirely parasitic.

    In the ‘60s 24% of black children were born to unwed mothers, today it’s 74%. The vast majority of black women now use and abuse their children in a deliberate effort to abuse the system. These children are raised to believe that they are victims of white oppressors even though it’s white taxpayers who are doing more to put food in their belles, clothes on their backs and roof over their heads than their own parents.

    Blacks are increasingly playing the past injustice card in order to obfuscate the current injustice they inflict on this country. The same goes for Black Lives Matter.

    The only solution for this problem is a total separation of the races.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Affirmative action was done by the WASPS President Lyndon Johnson, his VP Hubert Humphrey and most of all, by President Richard Nixon the Quaker and 3 men named Bloomrosen, Levy and Levine whom Nixon appointed to the EEOC.

    There weren't any black Senators and very few black congress critters when the 1968 affirmative action civil rights act was passed. And very few women were in congress. It was all done by White men, mostly not Jews.

    And it was an all White, mostly protestant supreme court that sentenced hundreds of millions of White children to 12 years of horror with their decision in Brown vs Topeka 1956. And it was that minion of satan on earth, Justice Brennan White and probably a Catholic don't know or care who penned those words words that made discrimination against Whites the law of the land: "Disproportionate representation is in and of itself clear and present evidence of discrimination" Griggs vs Duke Power.


    But of course, 20 years later when all the White government workers had retired or been driven out and Whites pointed out that some especially big city government departments are like 70 percent black, the justices refused to hear the cases. When 13 percent of the population holds 60 percent of the job, that's not discrimination if they are black.

    Brown vs Topeka 1956 the supreme court led by that minion of satan, Earl Warren, Republican WASP
    ruled that it is against the 14th amendment and other constitutional rights the minions of Satan made up for that case for a black child to be assigned an all black school 10 blocks away from home when there is a White school nearer. Well, that seems reasonable. The supreme court has the aboslute power to make up any law it chooses and has had that power since 1804 when President Madison gave it to the supreme court of evil old men and women in black robes.

    But within ten years the minions of satan on the supreme court and in all the lower federal courts were decreeing that the 14th amendment and the constitution decreed that both black and White and all races of children get up at 5/am, walk to their neighborhood school be picked up by a bus at 6/30 and driven 80 miles to another school. Then reverse the process after school.

    a trillion dollars have been spent on school desegregation and full employment for black schooll bus drivers and those black infested big city school departments. Those school departments are nothing but full employment projects for black women.

    I've made a list of the anti White attorneys in all the school bussing and affirmative action cases. even as far back as the infamous Brown vs Topeka. In the case of Brown vs Topeka, all the attorneys but the black actor Thurgood Marshall were Jews. Even brown , the plaintiff wasn't the little black girl who had to walk 10 blocks over railroad tracks to school. She was a Jew attorney. And Why, in the world the minions of satan who run the courts accepted an adult attorney as plaintiff for a grade school admission case, only satan can tell us.

    Has anyone ever heard of an attorney being both plaintiff and attorney for the plaintiff? Any lawyers on the site who can answer that. Adn if you read the jewish publications bragging about how they have destroyed the White goyim, you will learn that all the money since 1930 that resulted in Brown vs Topeka was donated by AJC, ADL and other jewish organizations.

    I don't know why protestants keep yammering on about some prostitute who lived 3,000 years ago in Babylon and ignore the true evil done against the White goyim by the supreme court and lower federal courts.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 marked the end of the longest experiment in Communism in recent history. Many saw this event as the proof that Communism (or Marxism-Leninism, I use these interchangeably here) was not a viable ideology. After all, if in Russia Communism was formally ended in 1991, the Chinese quietly...
  • The main problem with this article and the comments is that it discusses differences in “isms” but not differences in people. People are not fungible.

    I now define the “Left” as collectivists and the “Right” as individualists. These two basic personality traits are not very compatible. Unfortunately, there is no hard definition of this because most people have some combination of both traits.

    I believe that the USA was as successful as it was because a large population of high functioning individualists were pretty much left alone to conduct business via a meritocracy. I refer to the independent, self-reliant pioneers that settled this country. These people thrived on room to grow, natural resources, and the ability of the cream to rise. Contrast this to the indigenous population that was highly collectivist.

    This is why I have become a White Nationalist. People develop cultures as a means of survival, based upon their history, character and environment. We are not the same even within races. It would be best if we could live in a culture best suited to our nature. Forcing incompatible people to live together is a very bad idea.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    " I define the " Left" as collectivists and the "Right" as individualists"

    Not off the mark, however I define the "Left" as : Dummköpfe" , dummies who wouldn't be Leftists if they were not such idiots.

    There is no such animal as an "Intelligent" Leftist, and all of the blather about the edumacation level of Leftists is simply that : Blather. They, Leftists, are not truely educated or intelligent, by any stretch of the imagination, as they do not EVER understand the issues and constellations within which they are delving.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz artist.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The Indian tribesman's claim to his ancient stomping grounds can't be reduced to a title search at the deeds office. That's the stuff of the positive law. And this was the point I took away from a conversation, circa 2000, with Mr. Property Rights himself, Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Dr. Hoppe argued unassailably—does he argue any other...
  • I will call them Native Americans for want of a better term, but I wish they would come up with a name they prefer. Every so often blacks come up with a new label they demand we call them.

    Like so many of the discussions here on Unz, you people get bogged down arguing about past injustice or whose factoids are more correct. The only thing that really matters is how we move forward.

    It is my observation that all Native American tribes are determined to rebuild their nations. For the most part they have rejected full integration into the USA proposed during the Dawes era. They accepted US citizenship in 1924 in order take advantage of the growing US welfare system, but they want sovereignty as well.

    There are 567 or so tribes in America all wanting separate sovereign nations. These people are so racist that they won’t live with one another. To be a citizen of the Navajo Nation you must have at least one quarter Navajo blood. A Cherokee citizen must be descended for someone listed on the Dawes rolls. Most other nations are equally racist.

    As a White Nationalist I support this. The local tribe has worked hard to get upgraded from a Rancheria to a fully recognized federal nation even though there are only about 1000 of them. I am currently in negotiations with them to turn over 3 acres of my land to their nation. However, they were not happy when I sat in a tribal council meeting and pointed out to them that they are every bit the racists that I am. Negotiations continue though.

    This is where this country needs to go. We need to live with our own people, in our own cultures.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Catalonia, in the southeastern corner of Spain, is in the news.[Catalonia Government Declares Overwhelming Vote for Independence, by Raphael Minder, NYT, Oct 6, 2017] I was there once, back in my salad days, on my way to a camping vacation down the coast at a sleepy little whitewashed village named Oropesa del Mar, now all...
  • As a born and bred Californian now living in Del Norte County, I support California’s secession. Northern Californians have been trying to secede from California since 1941. This might give us that opportunity.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_(proposed_Pacific_state)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In post-America, holidays to honor what were once national heroes are now opportunities for iconoclasm. The black-clad communist terrorists known as “Antifa” have announced plans to spend Monday defacing and destroying monuments to the great Italian explorer who opened up America to large-scale European settlement [Antifa group plans nationwide ‘deface Columbus Day’ Actions for Monday,...
  • @Charles Pewitt
    The baby boomers are currently benefiting from extraordinary monetary policy from the globalized central banks. I don't concern myself with negative or positive attributes of this or that sort between generations. An honest baby boomer would admit that they would be financially wiped out if the federal funds rate were to go to the normal level of 6 percent. Debt has saved the financial bacon of the baby boomers. When Americans born after 1965 refuse to pay the debt, the whole American Empire will implode. Then we will have true economic growth as we build again.

    To answer the question of whether I would collapse the bubbles in stocks, bonds and real estate to create the political conditions necessary to halt mass immigration and begin mass deportations, the answer is yes.

    22 percent federal funds rate in 1981. That would collapse the asset bubbles in two weeks.

    Firstly, I am an example that your first statement is wrong. I have planned for my own retirement. I don’t collect social security but live off of my savings. If I was making an honest return on my savings my capital would be increasing, not decreasing. Zero percent interest rate is theft from me. I’m sure this applies to a lot of boomers, but I deem it a moot point.

    I agree that a total global economic collapse is the only thing that will save Western Civilization. It is absolutely inevitable and I eagerly await it. I would rather go down fighting than die a rich old man in bed.

    You still haven’t told me why you think your generation is more capable than the boomers. Most of the people I know who gearing up for the civil war that will follow the economic collapse are old farts like me. What is your generation doing?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Charles Pewitt
    James Kirkpatrick says:

    The battle to redefine Columbus Day is part of a larger War on Whites which has the goal of rendering the dispossession of Europeans worldwide as legitimate and even praiseworthy.

     

    I say:

    The War On Whitey(WOW) will be won by Whites born after the year 1965. I see the War On Whitey as being an internecine war conducted by evil baby boomer scum such as Bill Clinton, George W Bush, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Clinton, Bush, Obama and Hillary are just fronts for larger demographic forces at work in the world.

    Whites born after the year 1965 can refuse to fight on the battlefields of their enemies choosing. Government debt repudiation will be the superweapon used by Whites born after 1965 to put an end to the anti-White attacks currently underway.

    The White baby boomers who are attacking their own young people know that monetary policy is the only thing propping up the asset bubbles in stocks, bonds and real estate. Baby boomers are the ones benefiting from the money printing and asset purchases of the globalized central banks.

    DEBT AND DEMOGRAPHY

    Treasonous baby boomers are the one global cohort that is keeping the War On Whitey going. Once the baby boomers are financially liquidated by government debt repudiation, the Whites born after 1965 will defeat the anti-White evil that is conducting the War On Whitey.

    I like your spunk Charles and I hope you are right, but I don’t perceive that determination in your generation.

    From my perspective the younger generations have drunk even more of the Kool-Aid. Antifa is of this generation. I can no longer tolerate the multiculturalism and diversity that saturates the popular culture of your generation. I don’t watch any TV anymore and refuse to watch movies that inject Africans into European folklore. I could go on and on.

    Please show us why you are so optimistic about your generation. I would love to see it.

    Love from a Boomer.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Charles Pewitt
    The baby boomers are currently benefiting from extraordinary monetary policy from the globalized central banks. I don't concern myself with negative or positive attributes of this or that sort between generations. An honest baby boomer would admit that they would be financially wiped out if the federal funds rate were to go to the normal level of 6 percent. Debt has saved the financial bacon of the baby boomers. When Americans born after 1965 refuse to pay the debt, the whole American Empire will implode. Then we will have true economic growth as we build again.

    To answer the question of whether I would collapse the bubbles in stocks, bonds and real estate to create the political conditions necessary to halt mass immigration and begin mass deportations, the answer is yes.

    22 percent federal funds rate in 1981. That would collapse the asset bubbles in two weeks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Sex differences are in the news. A male Google employee reviewed some of the literature on the topic in the context of his workplace practices, and got sacked. A book questioning the role of testosterone in sex differences, and more generally the veracity of innate biological sex differences, got the Royal Society Science Book prize,...
  • @John Jeremiah Smith

    The only way women are going to be equally represented in management is do it the same way men did it: create their fair share of the pie. If women had created their fair share of the businesses and jobs then they would be equally represented in management because they would be CEOs of their own companies. The glass ceiling exists because women are totally dependent on men to promote them.
     
    Valid counterpoints, agreed. In defense of my position, permit me to re-state that I refer solely to hiring, to job assignment, to task performance in at-will employment, i.e. as HR Director, who do I hire and why?

    Building a successful company and becoming CEO is not a "Who do I hire and why?" set of conditions; it is entrepeneurial and participatory.

    In defense of my position, permit me to re-state that I refer solely to hiring, to job assignment, to task performance in at-will employment, i.e. as HR Director, who do I hire and why?

    I deliberately deleted a paragraph that addressed your position for brevity because I just assumed that it was obvious that the ultimate example applies across the board.

    Climbing the corporate ladder, or for that matter academia, is equally competitive. The list of achievers in the STEM fields are mostly male because white men are the most competitive people on the planet. Women have to place themselves on this list on their own before they will be seen as equals.

    There are lots of other differences in the way men and women approach the work place, not the least of which is that a man is his work. The great men in history that I admire are remembered for their body of work. Do I have to name them for you? I’m astonished that as an HR person you seem totally unaware of this.

    Do you hire for affirmative action and diversity? Does equality to you mean equal outcomes but not equal contributions?

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    Do you hire for affirmative action and diversity? Does equality to you mean equal outcomes but not equal contributions?
     
    You've gone too far afield. Sorry, no interest.

    Reminder: Is a score on an IQ test the proper measure of an individual's desirability as an employee? Answer: No. Only demonstrated merit, experience and ability are proper measures of suitability to employment, or, in the case of inexperienced new hires, aptitude and attitude.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • James Thompson tries to make a scientific argument for the under representation of women in certain areas by crunching the only raw data available, IQ. I have to agree with John Jeremiah Smith that this is a bad approach, but I can’t agree with some of his other arguments. Let me use another data set to make the same point.

    The only way women are going to be equally represented in management is do it the same way men did it: create their fair share of the pie. If women had created their fair share of the businesses and jobs then they would be equally represented in management because they would be CEOs of their own companies. The glass ceiling exists because women are totally dependent on men to promote them. If women have not shown an equal ability to create successful businesses, why should men assume they are equally qualified to run them.

    There are many reasons the percentage of female CEOs do not track IQ. One reason is NOT some white male good old boy system. Successful businesses are survivors of ruthless cutthroat competition and are as objective as is possible in this world.

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    The only way women are going to be equally represented in management is do it the same way men did it: create their fair share of the pie. If women had created their fair share of the businesses and jobs then they would be equally represented in management because they would be CEOs of their own companies. The glass ceiling exists because women are totally dependent on men to promote them.
     
    Valid counterpoints, agreed. In defense of my position, permit me to re-state that I refer solely to hiring, to job assignment, to task performance in at-will employment, i.e. as HR Director, who do I hire and why?

    Building a successful company and becoming CEO is not a "Who do I hire and why?" set of conditions; it is entrepeneurial and participatory.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Genuflecting is in the news—football players, mainly black ones, “taking a knee” during pre-game playing of the National Anthem. The most recent example, from this Sunday: teams kneeling before the anthem, and being booed anyway–NFL fans booed players for kneeling before national anthem and standing for it | NFL players tried to show support for...
  • I believe there will be a separation of the races.

    The bankers and welfare/warfare state have already destroyed the economy. It is remarkable to me that it hasn’t collapsed already, but they are steaming full speed ahead toward it’s inevitable demise.

    When it collapses there will be civil unrest. This will explode into civil war and there is no doubt in my mind that it will fracture along racial lines.

    White people need to start planning to defend their communities and then rebuild this nation as our founding fathers intended: for “white persons of good character”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790

    We did it before and we can do it again.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • [This piece has been adapted and expanded from Alfred W. McCoy’s new book, In the Shadows of the American Century: The Rise and Decline of U.S. Global Power.] For the past 50 years, American leaders have been supremely confident that they could suffer military setbacks in places like Cuba or Vietnam without having their system...
  • I am no expert, but as far as I know, the Chinese economy is still utterly dependant upon manufacturing for Western consumerism. Despite trying to shift to local consumption, their economy is so precarious that it would suffer greatly without massive exporting.

    What would happen if we raised tariffs dramatically? Would this not be a windfall to the US government by essentially taxing Western consumers? How would the Chinese economy fair?

    I really don’t think the Chinese want to mess with their cash cow.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Vidi

    What would happen if we raised tariffs dramatically? Would this not be a windfall to the US government by essentially taxing Western consumers? How would the Chinese economy fair [sic]?
     
    China would suffer, but not too much. Only 18.3 percent of their exports go to the U.S. (http://www.worldstopexports.com/chinas-top-import-partners/). However, the $388 billion going to the U.S. is only the nominal amount; due to something called "transfer pricing", China actually earns much less than that. A company might buy a pair of shoes for $5 in China and sell it for $100 in the U.S. (it's an example, so I made up the numbers, though something like this is common). The trade is registered as a $100 surplus in China's favor, but China only earns $5 from it. Therefore, if they lose this trade they will suffer, but not too much.

    Meanwhile, if the U.S. tariffs stopped all imports from China, the shelves of Walmart (e.g.) would be practically empty -- for years. Millions of Americans, who are already on the brink, will be destroyed if the prices of their daily necessities go way up. If the U.S. only experienced riots as a consequence, it would be lucky; a violent revolution would be very possible.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • By now many of you must have heard the news: a Russian Lieutenant-General, Valery Asapov, and two Colonels have been killed in what appears to be a very precisely targeted mortar attack. Just as in the case of the Russian military police unit recently attacked near Deir ez-Zor, the Russians are accusing the Americans of...
  • I never quite understood why Congress and the Deep State have shown so much animosity toward Russia for the past few years, the sanctions bill etc.

    It also seems that they are trying to kill two birds with one stone by linking Trump with Russian hacking. All Jeff Sessions has done is roll over for Trumps enemies by appointing a special prosecutor for this; I have yet to hear of him seriously investigating any member of the Deep State.

    I have to conclude that the Deep State has been planning for this Syrian end game for a long time. They have done their preparation work well.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • With the rise in public visibility of far-right-wing militants in the U.S. following the events in Charlottesville, much of the public is scrambling to understand just what this movement is and what forces are driving it. With much of the public discussing strategies for how best to fight right-wing extremism, the need for constructive solutions...
  • DiMaggio labels white nationalists far-right. There has been an effort of late to label WNs leftists because we are collectivist, promote social programs for whites, blah, blah, blah.

    This appears to be yet one more organized effort to demoralize and discredit the alt-right. Does anyone know where this is coming from?

    Read More
    • Replies: @FKA Max

    This appears to be yet one more organized effort to demoralize and discredit the alt-right. Does anyone know where this is coming from?
     
    I believe Steve Bannon was/is behind it, read lengthy comment of mine about this here:

    I believe these Alt Light/Lite attacks on the Alt Right are orchestrated and coordinated by Steve Bannon
    [...]
    “Ethno-nationalism — it’s losers. It’s a fringe element. I think the media plays it up too much, and we gotta help crush it, you know, uh, help crush it more.
     
    - http://www.unz.com/article/charlottesville-and-the-new-york-times/#comment-1986722
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Late this morning, outraged emails started pouring in. My correspondents reported "getting sick" and having their "heart ache". The cause of all that? They had just watched Trump's speech at the UN. I sighed and decided to watch the full speech for myself. Yeah, it was painful. You can read the full (rush,not official) text...
  • @Cyrano
    You really don’t get it, do you? Pure capitalism is pure evil. Dreaming of some return to an idyllic past when capitalism was pure and wonderful is idiotic because it has no links to reality. Communism – or more exactly Socialism – made the lives of the working classes better everywhere in the world.

    If it wasn’t for the October Revolution, people will still be working 16 hour days for slave wages. All concessions to the working class in capitalist countries were done AFTER the October revolution.

    Social security act in US was passed in 1935 in the midst of the deepest recession the capitalism has ever experienced. Why was it passed at particular time, when financially US was in so much trouble it could hardly afford it? Because the capitalists grew a hearth and started feeling sorry for the millions of unemployed and destitute? Hardly. Those concessions to the working class were done under the threat of possible Communist revolution like the one that occurred in USSR not even 2 decades earlier.

    Communism improved the lives of almost everyone on this planet – except the rich. Something has to be seriously wrong with someone’s head to think that the solution to everything is going back to some “purer” form of capitalism.

    Be careful what you wish for, the living standards in the US started stagnating after 1991. Also the income inequalities started growing around the same time. Coincidence? I don’t think so.

    There is no communist threat anymore to keep the greedy in check. They feel safe, so they can indulge in rewarding themselves after the long decades of “suffering” because of communism, when they were limited in how much they can allow their greed to roam wild.

    The only thing that the invisible hand is good for is to make the money invisibly disappear into the pockets of the rich.

    There is one aspect of American capitalism you fail to factor in. Henry Ford showed that his company profited best when his employees were able to buy the products they manufactured. You cannot manufacture for mass consumerism if you have no consumers. Enlightened self interest. Globalism is destabilizing this balance.

    Read More
    • Agree: Talha
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Immigration patriots are fighting back against Donald Trump’s dalliance with a DACA [Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals] Amnesty, and there’s evidence they’re having the predicted impact. But in the furor, the H-1B “temporary” worker program has been pushed to the background. Patriots need to keep their eyes on this program as well. Most VDARE.com readers...
  • @DB Cooper
    You keep on bragging that Indians in America has the highest income. But can you provide one study that shows that Indians are on par with the rest of the world in terms of cognitive ability?

    I have yet to see one study that shows that Indians are on average as smart as they claim themselves to be. On the other hand studies over studies have shown that Indian perform dismally in whatever subjects that need brain power. The only thing that Indians are good at are spelling bees competition. I can give them that.

    I have worked with Indian engineers in the USA and Singapore, and I am not impressed. I was hired by a design center based in Singapore to get a microprocessor development program back on track. The 4 Chinese and 3 Indian engineers didn’t know how to proceed. I finished up the architecture and supervised the detailed design. Look at under Computers and Graphics here:

    http://myplace.frontier.com/~mpresco/index.htm

    The average IQ in India is 82, so the only way to account for the high average in this country is that we have succeeded in cherry picking. These people are needed far more in India than here. Who has the greater responsibility, we white people to provide them a first world quality of life, or these achievers to help raise the quality of life for their own people? Until India becomes a first world country, they victimize the world by failing to become equal partners of the “International Community”. These Indians who have fled the third world cesspool they have made of their part of the world are self serving scumbags out to benefit no one but themselves.

    Read More
    • Agree: ATX Hipster
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • OK, immigration, the ongoing soap opera. Let’s start with the week’s logical disaster: The Dreamers, 800,000 artfully named Latinos who were brought over as children, sometimes as children of thirty-five. Under something called DACA, a sort of almost amnesty, they had work permits. They were working. Yes, doing their part as Americans: paying taxes to...
  • Fred just refuses to get it. Wasn’t he supposed to go into hiding? Like most globalists he doesn’t understand that cultures reflect the content of the character of the people who create them.

    He paints these dreamers as victims because they will have to live in the shitholes their people have made of their parts of the world while ignoring how Americans are being victimized by being forced to foot the bill to facilitate them turning our part of the world into the same kinds of shitholes that they don’t want to live in.

    Their parents are assholes for intentionally having children they know cannot provide for, and then intentionally dumping them on us and conning us into providing for them. What makes Fred think that they are not the next generation of identical assholes. In the movie “Elysium” they were still doing this into the twenty second century even though we fled the earth to escape there parasites.

    All of this is justified, of course, because we’re rich and they’re poor. Bullocks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Hurricane Harvey has been an incredible disaster, and we should keep the poor and beleaguered citizens of east Texas and southwestern Louisiana in our constant prayers and do what we can to assist them. This is a moment of need that will probably continue for months. About this immense and unprecedented natural disaster, I found...
  • @Thomm

    You do not have the slightest clue what kind of people white nationalists are. Very few are neo-Nazis.
     
    Racism combined with left-wing economic views. It is all the same.

    hat we know about the politically correct white elite is that the vast majority of them live in lily-white gated communities that keep non-whites out.

    It is because of crime, not race. Those gated communities all have Asians. Every single one of the most expensive towns in America has disproportionate Asian presence. Then again, WNs don't do math, so you probably can't grasp this.

    But it is not about 'elite' whites. It is about normal whites, and the small (10%) minority that comprise the genetic wastebaskets that are WN. That is why WN never gets any traction with normal whites.

    You are a genetic aberration and continue to reside in the dustbin of history. One can dislike black dysfunction without being a Nationalist-Leftist.

    Well Thomm my man, there is just no getting through to you. I have given you arguments and evidence that disprove your claims but you just regurgitate the same old tripe. Here’s one more.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/life/caixin/2015/07/silicon_valley_white_asian_divide_why_families_self_segregate_and_what_can.html

    Even after I prove to you that I work in high tech, do math and have actually lived in one of those gated communities, you ignore it and begin your usual infantile insults and sniping. You really behave like you are a member of Antifa.

    You have failed to prove you are what you say you are even after braying about your grand achievements like a jackass. The only thing you have shown me is that you are the one with “a negro IQ”. From what I have read many at this site will agree with this.

    I will stop wasting my time now.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thomm

    Saying that blacks are better looking than Whites is as untrue as you can get.
     
    I didn't say that at all.

    I just say that white variance is so high, that WNs have zero in common with successful whites. WNs represent wastebaskets that genetic matter is purged from. This is why white women rightfully want nothing to do with loser WN males.

    I realize you don't understand concepts like variance, etc., so you can't figure out why successful whites want nothing to do with you.

    You have no business taking credit for what successful whites do. You are just a wigger (a WN with a negro IQ).

    Remember, the white race has to be divided into two, so the hierarchy of brains/looks/talent/character is :

    Successful whites
    Asians
    Hispanics
    Blacks
    WNs

    I bet you still don't understand the concept of variance. Successful white are on the very top. WNs are on the very bottom. That is why successful whites don't let you into respectable society.

    Heh heh heh heh

    Thomm, your tired old tripe is not an argument. It is just your opinion, and it is presented in such an infantile manner that it makes your opinion worthless.

    You do not have the slightest clue what kind of people white nationalists are. Very few are neo-Nazis.

    You do not have the slightest clue what the white elite think about WNs. What we know about the politically correct white elite is that the vast majority of them live in lily-white gated communities that keep non-whites out.

    I assume that would include you, unless you can prove you are who you say you are. I’m betting you can’t.

    I am a white nationalist that prove your statements wrong. I am highly successful technologically and financially. Here are two examples.

    Can you do better?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    You do not have the slightest clue what kind of people white nationalists are. Very few are neo-Nazis.
     
    Racism combined with left-wing economic views. It is all the same.

    hat we know about the politically correct white elite is that the vast majority of them live in lily-white gated communities that keep non-whites out.

    It is because of crime, not race. Those gated communities all have Asians. Every single one of the most expensive towns in America has disproportionate Asian presence. Then again, WNs don't do math, so you probably can't grasp this.

    But it is not about 'elite' whites. It is about normal whites, and the small (10%) minority that comprise the genetic wastebaskets that are WN. That is why WN never gets any traction with normal whites.

    You are a genetic aberration and continue to reside in the dustbin of history. One can dislike black dysfunction without being a Nationalist-Leftist.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thomm
    So everyone who isn’t an open-borders, free-market purist and monist who’d abolish the welfare-state is a “leftist” even if they’re hated and censored and punished by the SJW/feminst/cultural Marxist/white-hating/black-racialist left

    Yes. There is more than one type of leftist. Hitler fought Stalin, you know.

    Anything that is not free-market/small government is leftist. White Nationalist-Leftists are particularly left-wing, given their love of tariffs and intra-white socialism*.

    *WN is really just untalented, bottom-tenth white males who want the resources of successful whites (like myself) to be shared with them, based on nothing other than shared ancestry from Europe centuries ago.

    Remember that white variance is very high, which is why there is such a huge gap between talented whites and WN losers.

    Thomm, You have never adequately defined who you are and what your political position is. All you do is engage in immature name calling and sniping. To me you sound like a young naïve libertarian who is a true believer in the new religion of anti-racism. Like the fascist antifa, who call the alt-right fascist to try to discredit us, you are just as dishonest to call us leftists. Let me try to educate you in the error of your ways.

    It is my belief that the kind of libertarianism I think you promote exists only in this country. It was created by the independent, self-reliant pioneers that settled this country. Only white people with this particular aptitude demonstrate the necessary individual responsibility to make your kind of libertarianism work.

    Unfortunately, most white women don’t have this quality. Being more social and collectivist, they are using the franchise to move this country to the left by creating the nanny state. Women are using democracy to transfer financial responsibility for women and children from some beta male provider to the taxpayer. This is a very good deal for these women. They don’t have to have sex with the guy, cook for the guy, clean up after the guy or be inconvenienced by the guy in any way, shape or form. They just vote themselves the right to reach into the pockets of every man in this country and take what they want. They have voted themselves a license to steal.

    Most people of color are tribal collectivists who think the tribe should provide. They are two orders of magnitude worse than white women. So you see, your kind of libertarianism cannot survive in a democracy in the politically correct environment you promote. The parasites will seize control, run your life and steal you blind.

    I have defined myself as a libertarian in all but immigration policy. Dealing with white parasites is hard enough, dealing with a large population of non-white parasites is impossible in a democracy. Just ask the Venezuelans.

    How many non-white-males fit your definition of libertarian?

    http://www.salon.com/2015/06/10/why_libertarianism_is_so_popular_on_the_right_its_the_last_bastion_of_white_male_dominance/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm
    I have been over this many times over here, so you will have to dig up my prior comments.

    In summary :

    1) White variance is extremely high. A WN loser has no more in common with a talented, successful white than a chihuahua has with a German Shepherd.

    Median white success tells us nothing. The two groups have to be split out. Hence, the real hierarchy of brains/talent/looks/character is :

    Successful whites
    Asians (East and South)
    Hispanics
    Blacks
    WNs

    2) Untalented people tend to be socialists and devise various rationalizations for why the property of talented people should be redistributed towards them. WNs are no different, because they want intra-white socialism.

    They are two orders of magnitude worse than white women.
     
    If you are *that* delusional, you deserve what you are getting. Thanks for reminding us that WN is a goddess cult.

    Libertarianism (or equivalent small-govt ideology) is the most fair and most just. WNs fare poorly under meritocracy, so they oppose it.
    , @KenH

    Thomm, You have never adequately defined who you are and what your political position is. All you do is engage in immature name calling and sniping.
     
    I see you have become acquainted with Thomm the turd burgler and troll. You are right as there is almost never any data or cogency to his arguments and claims. Just baseless ad hominem attacks.

    He loves Indians (the red dot variety from India) and thinks they're the smartest people to ever grace planet earth but he can't explain why India remains stuck in 3rd world status or why their best and brightest want to leave for America and other white nations. Yet he claims to be a "a white male from the great lakes area" when pressed about his racial and ethnic lineage.

    He's the only white man I'm aware of who worships India and Indians.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • To understand many Mexican attitudes toward the United States and immigration, you have to go back to the Mexican-American War of 1846-48, of which most Americans have never heard. The United States attacked Mexico in a war of territorial acquisition, occupied Texas, California, New Mexico, and Arizona, and drove south to conquer Mexico City. It...
  • Fred has gotten only one thing right. They are coming here because there are no jobs down there. The reason for this is that there are not enough white men down there to provide enough jobs for everyone. Every country south of our border that is minority white is, without exception, a third country that they do not want to live in.

    People of native American descent are flooding across our borders because this is where the white men, the wealth creators and job creators, are. Their homelands were always south of our borders. The “reconquista” is just one of the many lame excuses they use to justify why they have the right to elbow their way into this country, dump themselves on white men and demand that we provide them a quality of life they cannot provide themselves.

    If we do not do this for them to their satisfaction, they scream racism, oppression, marginalization, disenfranchisement and white male privilege. However, when this country becomes minority white, there won’t be enough of us to provide jobs, welfare, food stamps, housing and healthcare for them here either.

    Read More
    • Agree: Alden, SMK
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • After chatting with Brett Stevens on Twitter, this is my attempt to move beyond the recent tiff and explain why White Nationalism 1.0 failed and how the Alt-Right is moving beyond that now. I’ve outlined the external and internal factors that held the movement back: Structural Factors Here’s a summary of the most important external...
  • @Thomm
    I’ve noticed that Thomm is some kind of troll who comes on this site just to sneer at Whites.

    Wrong again. I come here to PRAISE the top 70% of whites (like myself) who find WNs to be losers.

    What your butthurt comments continue to reveal is that successful whites are SOOOO different from WN wiggers that WNs just don't get taken in and given handouts by successful whites.

    So someone like me, who praises my fellow whites for successfully keeping our ne'er do wells outside of polite society, is so bothersome for the WN losers.

    In summary :
    i) I praise successful whites, and how we swiftly kick WNs out.
    ii) This is the single greatest sadness for WNs. This is why white women don't want WNs.
    iii) The WN like Alden in turn attempts to speak for successful whites who just kicked him out yet again.

    Rinse and repeat. White variance is very high, so despite many whites being the very best, the bottom few are incompetitive with any other race. They have Negro IQs and Asian male seductive abilities. The worst of all worlds.

    Heh heh heh heh

    Wrong again. I come here to PRAISE the top 70% of whites (like myself) who find WNs to be losers.

    How many of these wonderful whites that you tout live in lily white neighborhoods? Do you live in a community that is minority white? Does the term “white flight” mean anything to you?

    You are a closet white nationalist if you commute longer than necessary and/or pay higher housing costs than you would living in a minority white community.

    The main difference between the two groups is that white nationalists are honest about it. If you are what you say you are, your ilk are dishonest, hypocritical, virtue signaling, braying jackasses that deserve what’s coming to you: becoming minorities in a third world county.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Prior to Hillary Clinton’s attack on it in her acceptance speech at the Democratic Party Convention last year, few Americans had heard of the alt-right. Hillary’s dramatic disquisition tried to conjure up nightmarish specters of radical anti-Semites, goose-stepping neo-Nazis, Klansmen in white robes, and of course the closet white supremacists at Breitbart.com. While the alt-right...
  • The author fails to acknowledge a highly correlated fact. Every country in Latin America that is minority white is a third world country because there are not enough white men to provide jobs for everyone.

    Latin Americans are heading north by the tens of millions because this is where the white men are, the wealth creators and job creators. When the USA becomes minority white, there won’t be enough of us to provide jobs for them here either.

    Only white men can create white cultures, and only white men can maintain them. It is called Western Civilization.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Billionaire businessman Marc Cuban insists that the H-1B visa racket is a feature of the vaunted American free market. This is nonsense on stilts. It can't go unchallenged. Another billionaire, our president, has ordered that the H-1B program be reformed. This, too, is disappointing. You'll see why. First, let's correct Mr. Cuban: America has not...
  • @Astuteobservor II
    the program would never be gone because it is part of the "brain drain." how else are we going to come up with smart people?

    the program would never be gone because it is part of the “brain drain.” how else are we going to come up with smart people?

    Well I see your point if you are a typical example of American intelligence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    I don't think you can see any points even when they hit you in the face :)))
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Inertiller
    Kudos for the comment that suggests this country will have more than a few problems if H1-Bs leave. Uncomfortable as it sounds, they are a major support column for entire industries. Pull that away and the whole shebang collapses into it's own footprint. Corporations come and go as they please. They move money at the speed of light, it's the white infidel and his co-worker, the wetback who have to obey the rules the corporate tyranny forced upon them about where they can go, moreover who they can work for.

    Consider the impact of a ban on the foreigners: IT departments from your local utility to your neighborhood bank, defense contractors, manufacturers - all of these venerable institutions have taken the race to the bottom approach - they have sourced or supplemented with the best bang for the buck. Conservaive propagandists have insisted (for 40 years)that paying market wages is downright communsit. Both political parties are on the same page here, don't be fooled. The Orange Realtor is pretending the workin' man matters all of sudden.

    Bullshit. The entire conservative pedagogy, featuring fairy tales of the free market, superior breeding, Ayn Rand, stoicism, boot strap pulling and the sloth of the natives has been sold and bought by the average American idiot, while the middle class has been crushed. Gates, Bezos, Koch, Immelt, Blankfein, Schmidt, countless welfare recipients you've never heard of - have destroyed labor in this country.

    They even changed the definition of free market, which leads us to read blather like this from a psuedo-libertarian on a rich man's blog. Deeply authoritarian - by the way. I suppose "the Government" is going to have to make sure workers are treated fairly? Doesn't that get in the way of the cherished freedom of preying on, playing immigrants and the natives off each other and generally swindling people?

    But who else is going to give the alt-right their lusted for version of a punishment society? Trump loves the cops. Corporations love 'em too, as much as they do the Government they own, the laws they write, and the guns they control.

    Unfortunately, I can’t understand most of what you wrote. I do get the part that if it is not insourced, then it will be outsourced.

    If the job is lost to cheap third world labor, then better outsourced, than becoming minorities in a third world country. You should have also read the comments that along with the worker comes an extended family. I buy argument that this is a net burden to taxpayers for generations.

    In the case of manufacturing, there will be a crossing point when the overseas labor costs do not counterbalance the shipping costs. When the robots take over, increasing the unemployable population will exacerbate the problem.

    As for high tech, I have worked in the industry all of my life and have been extremely underwhelmed by the capabilities of third world engineers. I prefer to take my chances with higher skilled and innovative white men. We created the whole damn thing and we can solve the problems going forward.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @EugeneGur
    I wonder if people here advocating of the abolishment of H1 visa realize what would become of the fabled American universities if this happens. I'll tell you - they will slowly empty out. They will be no one to teach the students or do research, and the famous American science will soon become a thing of the past. Without the import of skilled foreign workers science is unsustainable, and the university education, already hideously expensive, would become even more so.

    The imported workers are not geniuses, of course, and oftentimes they aren't even fully qualified. But they do want to work in science or teach for the salary offered, whereas the Americans prefer do other things. The government spends money to train American citizens to do science, and then they go elsewhere in search of a better life. Foreigners, on they other hand, receive education in their home countries at someone else's expense, and they come here to do the job the Americans do not want. As simple as that.

    Given a chance, any university employer would prefer to hire a citizen, since they have many advantages over foreigners: visas cost money; visa applications cause delays; people cannot travel outside of the US without re-applying for the visa, so even a trip to attend a scientific conference becomes impossible; spouses on H4 (dependent for H1) are restricted in their ability to work; citizens are eligible for various grants and fellowships; not to mention all sorts of language and cultural barriers. There aren't just many available, that's all.

    So, getting rid of H1 vis or even severely restricting it would be catastrophic for this country. I know what I am talking about and not out of Wikipedia.

    Oh my, however did we manage before we were saved by the brown invasion. We built this incredibly desirable country without their help, and we can maintain it without them.

    Perhaps these indispensable people are needed in their own countries so that the third world cesspools they are fleeing will become first world countries. That they have turned their backs on their less fortunate relatives, in order to improve their quality of life here shows what self-serving scum they are. This is proven by their assertion that we have an obligations to afford them a shot at the America dream, while they shirk the responsibility to turn their countries into first world countries and improve the quality of life for their people. Until they do this, they victimize the world by not becoming fully contributing partners of the “International Community.”

    We of the Alt-Right have been appalled at how our institutions of higher learning have been turned into useless, corrupt, taxpayer scamming, lefty snowflake bastions of ineptitude. You just showed us many reasons why.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Ilana,

    Thank you for perceptively discussing this festering problem.

    For those wishing further detailed discussion, feel free to consult Norm Matloff where he provides exhaustive details on the functioning of the H-1B Program and how its purpose is to provide cheap, immobile, de facto indentured labor!

    The tragedy of these programs is that it prevents native born Americans from entering STEM fields.

    Read More
    • Agree: Mark Presco, Realist
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Washington has never made any effort to conceal its contempt for North Korea. In the 64 years since the war ended, the US has done everything in its power to punish, humiliate and inflict pain on the Communist country. Washington has subjected the DPRK to starvation, prevented its government from accessing foreign capital and markets,...
  • @bluedog
    Hmm seems a man that's little but a chicken hawk would stay away from subjects he knows nothing about for there were two Trails of Tears,the Cherokees which took no slaves with them for they died by the hundreds on that long trip in the winter to Oklahoma. where they lived in holes in the ground while they built Ft. Still the second one was the Navahos who made the same journey and suffered the same fate as their brothers and they took no slaves with them for I have yet to find or read where they ever owned any,and if you read your history of that time you will find that the whites were little different then those you call savages for who else would skin a women's breast for a tobacco pouch.....

    Look who doesn’t know what he’s talking about:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherokee_freedmen_controversy

    This supports my previous assertion that Native Americans are the most racist people in this country because citizenship in their nations is based solely on bloodlines. They won’t even with one another. However, as a White Nationalist I support this because we must all live with our own people in our own cultures.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bluedog
    Of course its the bloodline from the mothers side for you always know who your mother is while your father may be suspect..how about you...and the clans were set up the same way to prevent inbreeding and we would have been smart to have copied that, probably would have improved the gene pool.There you had the Five Civilized Tribes while here we had The Six Nation governed by representitives from each tribe depending on the number in the tribe, in fact part of our constitution is derived from their form of government,as far as the Freedman's they were free no longer slaves as we had just fought a war freeing ALL slaves so if any went they went of their own free will,the problem which arose within the Cherokee nation and the freedman was of course the allotment of money from the oil wells etc which included free health education and cash allotments which many/most felt should go to the blooded Cherokee people which didn't included the Freedman's..
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @basedKRN

    Why the North Koreans allow these horrid little trolls, the Kims, to control their lives like this is beyond me. White men wouldn’t tolerate this. This says something about the Asian mind.
     
    Right, white men wouldn't tolerate living under a Communist regime. They clearly rose up in effective, violent revolution and overthrew the USSR on the other side of the Iron Curtain out of their own sheer force of will, right? Hey, how come the Cubans tolerated Castro's regime for so long? Must say something about the white/Mestizo mind, after all Cubans are 64% white.

    Sir, that's a very shallow way of looking at it. Yes, white men can be very strong and independent as seen in the Founding Fathers, but cut my people some slack in the North for being brainwashed. Anybody who is caught organizing is sent to the death camps along with his entire family, and many North Koreans cannot trust even their closest friend if they say or do something out of line. Or so I've heard, maybe it's just propaganda.

    Well, we did something about it in South Korea, and no matter how badly some of you think we screwed it up, South Korea is a success story. But it isn’t a white culture and it shouldn’t be.
     
    South Korea is a success story, but you could argue if (((Washington))) didn't get America into WWI on some flimsy pretext, people who worked with those who pushed Communism in Europe, then perhaps we wouldn't have needed a war to fight off Communism in the first place.

    Imagine someone hires a bunch of people to set your neighborhood on fire, and then hires other people to come to your house to rescue you from your home. Yes, I'm grateful for the US veterans and other UN soldiers who came to fight off Communism in my homeland, but if their government had fought the USSR instead of Germany, we might have been better off.

    Sir, that’s a very shallow way of looking at it. Yes, white men can be very strong and independent as seen in the Founding Fathers, but cut my people some slack in the North for being brainwashed.

    I agree with most of what you have said here and in other comments, and I appreciate your candor. However, I will stick to my guns.

    For the last 40 or more years, you Koreans have been left well enough alone to work out your own problems. The Kims and his toadies have made it impossible. Your attempt to justify and excuse this behavior and the failure of the North Koreans to take control of their own future doesn’t work for me.

    Also your attempt to blame past events such as WW1 and WW2 for current failures is an old dodge usually used by black people. It doesn’t work for me either.

    It is precisely the failure of you Koreans to solve this problem that we are in this pickle. Do you think the belligerency of North Korea causes the neighboring nations legitimate concern?

    Now I don’t know what the hell Trump is up to, and so far I don’t like it. This is not why I voted for him. On this we agree 100%.

    I can only surmise that there are as many slimy Asian nations behind this move as three are slimy Middle East nations behind the Syrian move. And of course the US deep state mucking with it all.

    We freedom loving white men thought we had finally voted for a non deep state candidate. He’s not off to a good start. I am quite confident there are enough of us to use force if necessary.

    Check out the Battle of Berkeley video.

    See comment 90.

    See comment 36.

    Read More
    • Replies: @basedKRN

    For the last 40 or more years, you Koreans have been left well enough alone to work out your own problems. The Kims and his toadies have made it impossible. Your attempt to justify and excuse this behavior and the failure of the North Koreans to take control of their own future doesn’t work for me.
     
    If that were my perception, then I would agree with you. But that's not how I see it. From what little I know, most of the elected leaders since South Korea's establishment have been considered puppets of the US. I have no problem admitting the incompetence of my people, but again, I didn't see Eastern Europeans rise up to overthrow Communist rule. Besides, the US military pointing its immense military might and nuclear weapons of its own at North Korea doesn't have some effect on our relations? Have South Korean-US behavior in response to NK always been civil, reasonable? And with America having such a stellar track record of bringing peace and prosperity throughout the most of its foreign policy, the Norks surely are unjustified in spreading propaganda about US imperialism.

    Also your attempt to blame past events such as WW1 and WW2 for current failures is an old dodge usually used by black people. It doesn’t work for me either.
     
    I've never heard blacks say that before, but in either case, you are not making an argument here. And neither am I getting my views from niggers.

    What do you know about the sinking of the Lusitania being a flimsy pretext for America joining WWI? And what do you know about Soviet spy infiltration of the White House leading to war between Japan and America?

    https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/history/item/17147-the-communist-agent-who-caused-pearl-harbor-and-global-economic-havoc

    All I'm saying is, American foreign policy is how we got in this whole situation in the first place.

    It is precisely the failure of you Koreans to solve this problem that we are in this pickle. Do you think the belligerency of North Korea causes the neighboring nations legitimate concern?

    Now I don’t know what the hell Trump is up to, and so far I don’t like it. This is not why I voted for him. On this we agree 100%.

    I can only surmise that there are as many slimy Asian nations behind this move as three are slimy Middle East nations behind the Syrian move. And of course the US deep state mucking with it all.
     
    Yeah, Trump aka the US isn't helping us with the current situation. He's been aggravating it. Also, it's hard for me to know how much agency us Koreans actually have in all these affairs, and how much of it is influenced by America, and also Zionist influence on the Deep State.

    We freedom loving white men thought we had finally voted for a non deep state candidate. He’s not off to a good start. I am quite confident there are enough of us to use force if necessary.
     
    For the sake of America and the freedom of mankind, I hope you're right. There is no greater threat to elites who want to rule the world than free white persons of good character, armed and independent.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @MBlanc46
    As a white guy, I wish that I could agree with you. But white guys put up with the Bolshevik nightmare for seventy years.

    As a white guy, I wish that I could agree with you. But white guys put up with the Bolshevik nightmare for seventy years.

    I have never lived in North Korea or Russia, but it is my perception that NKs suffer a subjugation that is an order of magnitude greater than the Soviets. They are not equal simply because they both call themselves communist.

    NKs are not allowed to travel, their TVs and radios receive only government stations and way too many have been deliberately starved to death in order to fund missiles and nukes. They are controlled and regimented to a degree I still assert white men would not tolerate.

    Soviets were major players in the worlds arenas from sports to fine arts despite the risk of defection. I worked in the defense industry during the Cold War, but I liked the Russians, and felt the Russians liked us. This includes all the other Soviet satellites. It was our governments that couldn’t get along. Today, their cultures are not all that different than they were during the Cold War as far as I can tell. In fact there are lots of Soviets who are nostalgic for the good old days.

    https://communismgr.blogspot.com/2016/08/nostalgia-for-ussr-people-in-former.html

    In any case, there were real elections that resulted in leadership that thought that the remaining restrictions of Soviet rule should be removed so that Russians and the satellites could take their rightful place on the world stage. For my money, Gorbachev is the man of the century because he gave up personal power for what he thought was best for his people. Yeltsin doubled down, and the Russian military would not fire on its own people.

    https://www.pri.org/stories/2011-09-26/gorbachev-yeltsin-and-demise-ussr

    A Russian friend of mine told me the real reason Gorbachev is hated is because he restricted vodka.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_the_Russian_Empire_and_the_Soviet_Union

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • If any Koreans are reading this post, perhaps you would be interested in getting some information out.

    During the Viet Nam war, I was stationed in Korea and took up photography as a hobby. I published these pictures online in order to make them available to anyone interested in them; especially the people themselves or their relatives.

    http://korea1967.blogspot.com/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • This essay is completely biased against the USA. Both sides were ruthless and self serving. There is plenty of blame to go around. Past recriminations are pointless.

    The real problem since the war as I see it is that both sides have had the opportunity to move closer together and rebuild their country more suited to the Korean people. The only reason that hasn’t happened is that the Kims and the privileged that support them will not give up power.

    In order to maintain their privileged positions , the elite have kept the masses ignorant and hungry, even starving. This is inexcusable. Mike simply ignores this inconvenient truth.

    Why the North Koreans allow these horrid little trolls, the Kims, to control their lives like this is beyond me. White men wouldn’t tolerate this. This says something about the Asian mind. I have heard ex-pat Chinese, and others, say something should be about human rights in China. If a billion and a half Chinese can’t do something to improve their human rights, how can we? Why should we?

    Well, we did something about it in South Korea, and no matter how badly some of you think we screwed it up, South Korea is a success story. But it isn’t a white culture and it shouldn’t be.

    The globalists are completely wrong to believe people are fungible.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bluedog
    Of course "white men" wouldn't tolerate it but oops it was the "white men" who slaughtered a few million in Nam and surrounding countries not to mention 58,000 of our own, a million or so in Iraq Libya Syria Yemen and the rest of Africa, so one rousing cheer for the "white men' but if you don't mind I'll sit out of the cheering sector...
    , @MBlanc46
    As a white guy, I wish that I could agree with you. But white guys put up with the Bolshevik nightmare for seventy years.
    , @denk
    'The real problem since the war as I see it is that both sides have had the opportunity to move closer together and rebuild their country more suited to the Korean people. The only reason that hasn’t happened is that the Kims and the privileged that support them will not give up power'


    Korean war,
    How did the wound gets to fester for so long since ww2 ?

    In case you forget,

    murkka refused to sign a peace treaty with NK.

    Wolfowicz blocked a Chinese initiated peace talk in 1980.

    James Baker, sec of state
    'While we need to be sensitive to South Korea's concerns, they need to appreciate that our security commitments and interests give us a big say too."

    Another security 'crisis' ...
    MADE IN USA.
    Whose interest might that be, Lockheed Martin ?


    Cheney sabotaged another Chinese organised peace talk to de nuke Korean Peninsula in 2003,
    'I have been charged by the President with making sure that none of the tyrannies in the world are negotiated with. We don't negotiate with evil; we defeat it.'

    The same sordid affair continued in the following years right up to this day,
    Washington would throw a spanner into any Chinese/NK initiated peace plan, then blamed China for the mess.

    FF 2017

    China,
    'Washington should stop its provocations, so NK can drop its nuke progam, China would gaurantee NK's security'

    Trump
    'If China isnt doing anything ,...We will. !

    'If China isnt doing anything ...

    'If China isnt doing anything ...

    With that, Trump joins the 'prestigious ' ranks of the previous 44 liars voted into WH. !

    'Why the North Koreans allow these horrid little trolls, the Kims, to control their lives like this is beyond me. White men wouldn’t tolerate this. This says something about the Asian mind'

    As for those who elected 45 liars and war criminals at a stretch and allow them to run amok all over the planet.....

    Enuff said.
    , @basedKRN

    Why the North Koreans allow these horrid little trolls, the Kims, to control their lives like this is beyond me. White men wouldn’t tolerate this. This says something about the Asian mind.
     
    Right, white men wouldn't tolerate living under a Communist regime. They clearly rose up in effective, violent revolution and overthrew the USSR on the other side of the Iron Curtain out of their own sheer force of will, right? Hey, how come the Cubans tolerated Castro's regime for so long? Must say something about the white/Mestizo mind, after all Cubans are 64% white.

    Sir, that's a very shallow way of looking at it. Yes, white men can be very strong and independent as seen in the Founding Fathers, but cut my people some slack in the North for being brainwashed. Anybody who is caught organizing is sent to the death camps along with his entire family, and many North Koreans cannot trust even their closest friend if they say or do something out of line. Or so I've heard, maybe it's just propaganda.

    Well, we did something about it in South Korea, and no matter how badly some of you think we screwed it up, South Korea is a success story. But it isn’t a white culture and it shouldn’t be.
     
    South Korea is a success story, but you could argue if (((Washington))) didn't get America into WWI on some flimsy pretext, people who worked with those who pushed Communism in Europe, then perhaps we wouldn't have needed a war to fight off Communism in the first place.

    Imagine someone hires a bunch of people to set your neighborhood on fire, and then hires other people to come to your house to rescue you from your home. Yes, I'm grateful for the US veterans and other UN soldiers who came to fight off Communism in my homeland, but if their government had fought the USSR instead of Germany, we might have been better off.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • If you are a white student in college, you doubtless hear daily that white people are evil, the principal cause of everything wrong with the world. Whiteness is bad, white people are bad. We are to blame for everything. If you believe this, you are being gamed. What you are being told is nonsense. If...
  • @kemerd
    You do not mention Russians in your article; assuming, I suppose, they are white. But, they are certainly not only white.

    In any case, the proud owner of any achievement is the people who actually are responsible for the deed, not the race he belongs to. There is indeed an impact of the culture that allows/hinders creative people thrive but this is about culture, and country, and certainly not race.

    You, sir, are indeed racist.

    You could not be more wrong. Culture is almost entirely race based. See comment 113.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The only solution for the race problem is a total separation of the races. It has become absolutely clear to me that we can’t live together, as all of the bickering and recriminations in the comments have amplified.

    Far more important than specific white achievements, are the cultures we have built. Only white men can create white cultures and only white men can maintain them. It’s called Western Civilization. The main reason for this is that virtually all of the jobs in this county are created by white men.

    The great cities we have built, Detroit, Chicago etc. are turning to shit because black men don’t provide jobs for their people anywhere in the world. Every country south of our border that is minority white is a third world country because there are not enough white men to provide jobs for them. Hispanics are flooding across our borders by the tens of millions because this is where the white men – the job creators and wealth creators – are.

    The white bashing that Fred talks about is a carefully crafted relentless racist con game designed to convince whites that we have no choice, we must resign ourselves to becoming minorities in this country in a futile attempt to provide non-whites with economic parity to white men.

    This is not possible. When we become a minority, there won’t be enough white men to provide jobs for everyone. Latin America proves that beyond a shadow of a doubt, because white immigration began there 130 years before the English colonies.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • So it's been a few days since the Syria Strikes, everyone and his dog have thrown in their two cents, and there has been a set of confusing and contradictory reactions from US officials and pretty much everyone else involved in this saga. The more the contradictions pile on, the less clear the picture becomes....
  • @Amanda
    Following up on the monster bomb drop to kill 36 ISIS (@ $8.7 million each), this guy says this was more about showing up the weapons the psychos running the US have, as a threat to the rest of the world (Russia, Iran, NK, anyone else who doesn't go along)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koQH9nhyvyg

    Trump is lying and he knows it. He has no credible evidence to be so positive that Assad used chemical weapons. I can’t believe he is so stupid that he thinks he will get away with it. There has to be some extremely compelling reason to risk the negative consequences of being caught in a lie.

    This video suggests that a failing economy may be involved. While I have been thrilled to watch Trump outmaneuver the establishment, I always thought that it really won’t matter in the long run because he can do nothing to prevent the coming economic collapse.

    Some conspiracy theorists believe that the globalists want an economic collapse to complete their plans of bringing the West under the control of the New World Oligarchy. I have previously discounted this because the oligarchs would lose their wealth and have no chance of controlling the resulting chaos anyway.

    Could the threat of intentionally collapsing the economy be the leverage used against Trump?

    Might Trump have been convinced that war is the only tool left in the kit to prevent an imminent economic collapse?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The latest US cruise missile attack on the Syrian airbase is an extremely important event in so many ways that it is important to examine it in some detail. I will try to do this today with the hope to be able to shed some light on a rather bizarre attack which will nevertheless have...
  • @Anonymous
    You are obviously one of those white supremacist scum who think they own the world, and can do anything with it because they discovered or invented stuff, people are so in awe of.

    Mass murder, and sustaining such, means nothing for you. It proves the moral ciphers, evil and psychopathic, the likes of you are.

    Also, the likes of you are quite probably pagan polytheist idolaters, and with the rest of you being from the ranks of the godless. That proves the spiritual losers you are.

    The "cowards" you mention above are running away from war, created and sustained by the likes of you. At least those "cowards" see the evil that war brings to your soul, and want no part in it.

    Now, which is better, being cowards, or mass murdering evil psychopaths?

    And, let us be very clear, the greatest mass murdering evil psychopaths the world has ever known, have been pale faced scum, the likes of you.

    So you hate white people. Terrific, glad to hear it. I have a solution for you. Get the hell out of white cultures and stay the hell out of white cultures.

    What proves you wrong is that there are millions upon millions upon millions upon millions upon millions…. 10s of millions of people who are determined to put themselves under the heels of us evil white oppressors.

    So many in fact that we are doomed to become minorities in our own countries to these people. Apparently to people like you who hate us. Any sane white person should oppose this.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @bluedog
    Yes it did provide the highest standard of living at the expense of the rest of the world, but where is our standard of living now, gone baby gone for we are now reaping what we sowed chaos..

    Ah, the victim card.

    The greater truth is that the economic engines of Western Civilization have improved the lives of everyone in the world. The science, technology and medicine have made us all wealthier than we were 200 years ago.

    For 500 years we have been showing the world how it’s done, but except for Japan, China, South Korea and a handful other Asian nations, the rest of the world is not getting it.

    There is absolutely no excuse for the fact that the rest of the world has failed to forge themselves into first world countries. Because of this they victimize us all. They are not part of the “International Community” responsible for helping the truly needy, but chronically in need of help themselves.

    The chaos you asserted is caused by fact that the only thing they have figured out to do is elbow their way into white cultures, dump themselves on white men and demand that white men provide it for them. If we don’t do this for them to their satisfaction, we are demonized as racist, Nazis, fascists etc. The only possible explanation there can be for racial inequality is white male privilege.

    I’ll repeat myself. White cultures cannot function properly without a high degree of individual responsibility. Not only do Libertarian ideals fail, but the comprehensive social welfare system we have constructed collapses when parasites take more from the system than they contribute to it.

    Read More
    • Agree: Ace
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    Yes, we're all wealthier now at a time when debt has increased exponentially. Don't you just love 21st Century economics? All those gleaming American cities with state of the art industry and infrastructure, they have never looked better I have to admit. Another good bit is that it is now possible to eat a slice of delicious Black Forrest cake and find it still there after you've finished eating it. Truly amazing stuff indeed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @utu
    "If it were true, libertarianism would be pushed by the media 24/7"

    Not if the objective is to target the contrarians, those who think independently, those who are somewhat immune to media and in opposition to it. Anyway the end product are people who have affirmative attitude with respect to any excesses of corporations.

    Maybe I’m dense but I have tried to follow your thread on Libertarianism and I can’t figure out what you are talking about. Some snide comments that may mean something to you, but have no meaning to me. I haven’t heard one cogent argument from any of you.

    Are you totally anti-corporate? Do Bill’s remarks have something to do with conservative Christianity?

    For all of its faults, corporate America has helped provide Americans with one the highest standards of living in the history of the world. Sure there have been problems, but you haven’t provided a cogent solution. Everything everyone else has tried has been far worse.

    My concept of Libertarianism is simply maximizing individual freedoms. This allows the cream to rise resulting in maximizing individual achievements.

    The issues you anti-libertarianists have come up with don’t even begin to convince me that we should throw the baby out with the bathwater.

    The one caveat I have with Libertarianism is that it only works in white cultures. Only white men demonstrate the individual responsibility necessary to make it work. Importing black slaves, third world labor or outsourcing jobs screw it all up.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bluedog
    Yes it did provide the highest standard of living at the expense of the rest of the world, but where is our standard of living now, gone baby gone for we are now reaping what we sowed chaos..
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @alexander
    That's interesting ,anon

    I find the entire mess a total disaster....and we should have never gotten involved militarily anywhere over there.

    I also find our pattern of behavior has created a new species of war...where the desired outcome is NO outcome at all....not ever......just more WAR....

    Take Libya , for example, we overthrow a milk toast dictator, which creates anarchy, chaos and a breeding ground for new terrorists...which we will ,one day soon, need to destroy..then we will install another dictator... who we will eventually "tomahawk"..... to create "more" terrorists....

    I do not find we have done ONE constructive thing anywhere we have dropped a bomb or ravaged a village .

    I really don't....... Do you ?

    who can argue, Syria , Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Libya have become BETTER places since we went in there ?

    Nobody.

    The decimation on human lives is just immense....and all we have to show for all this bloodshed and heartache is a monstrous 20 trillion dollar HOLE in our balance sheet.

    The greatest waste of taxpayer money in the entire history of western civilization.

    It is a very sad time for all of us...

    Whats worst of all is our "elites" seem almost pathologically addicted to killing people.....Like where does that come from ?

    Has anyone examined the roots of this rather perverse pathology ?

    Do our elites feel EMPOWERED when the hit the million dead number ?..... or when they can successfully false flag us into war ? is that the big rush ?

    Is this the "creme de la creme" of global power ? Like the finest "wine of war" or something ?

    Is it the ultimate high....like going 240 in your Ferrari around Le mans ?

    How surreal is it, that Donald Trump gets his BONA FIDES from our big media, for launching an unconstitutional strike against Syrians who, in all likelihood, were never participants in the crime for which they were tomahawked ?

    Is there a big "Ohh Baby" we did it .again !...YES !.......Sweeeet !!........ Is that it ?

    Can anyone explain this with some degree of sophistication ?

    No, but I’ll try.

    As far as I can figure out, there are a lot of assholes out there, some with lots of money, who simply want what they want and don’t care who gets hurt it the process. In fact, some of these elites think that they are doing the world a favor by ridding the world of excess population.

    In the case of Syria: Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia etc. want Assad gone, big oil wants a pipeline, and all sorts of other economic and political interests.

    The main goal of US politicians is to get reelected and so they have to prostitute themselves for contributions. They are all bought and paid for by the aforementioned assholes and the assholes want it that way. The US is extremely susceptible to this. The motives of the Deep State are far less transparent, but every bit as self-serving as the politicians.

    The US military and arms suppliers are ready, willing and eager to go to war anywhere, anytime because it is good for profits and promotions. And what’s to worry about since no one has ever been prosecuted for war crimes.

    Almost all of these people are even more bat-shit crazy and more shortsighted than Trump is accused of being. They don’t care about the long term, much like corporate quarterly report shortsightedness. Few of them care about the world citizen. It is extremely disappointing to me that Trump seems to be getting so little help from patriotic Americans in the military and intelligence community who still believe in the Constitutional Republic and the rule of law.

    These asshats just don’t understand that the health and integrity of a nation is directly proportional to the health and integrity of its citizens.

    This ties into the thread about Libertarians. Whenever the elites have too much control, be they socialist or capitalist or monarchist, the effect is stifling. Allowing a nations citizens the maximum amount of freedom allows the cream to rise. I don’t know how to do this exactly, but it seems to me that the greatest period of advancement in this country was when it was so wide open that individual achievement was unfettered.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ghost
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLylpRn9uXQ

    This is an inspiring video and I think that is more true than not; but it begs the question of why millions of Syrian men of fighting age have fled the country.

    If they are patriotic Syrians then they should be counted among the freedom fighters who are depicted in the video. Obviously, they are cowards.

    If they are jihadis, are they cowards for fleeing a lost war, or brave for bringing that war to the US and Europe?

    Either way, I have no symphony or respect for Syrian migrants.

    Read More
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    Agreed, and the same can be said of young men from Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran. Truly it is shameful not to defend one's own country and people. The vast majority of "refugees" are young, single men.

    I know an old guy who has taken in two Iranian "refugee" boarders out of the kindness of his heart. They have suddenly "found" Christianity and are desperately seeking women (with citizenship) to marry ASAP. One dated a Chinese woman briefly but ended it pronto upon discovering that like himself she neither had citizenship nor permanent residency.
    , @Anonymous
    You are obviously one of those white supremacist scum who think they own the world, and can do anything with it because they discovered or invented stuff, people are so in awe of.

    Mass murder, and sustaining such, means nothing for you. It proves the moral ciphers, evil and psychopathic, the likes of you are.

    Also, the likes of you are quite probably pagan polytheist idolaters, and with the rest of you being from the ranks of the godless. That proves the spiritual losers you are.

    The "cowards" you mention above are running away from war, created and sustained by the likes of you. At least those "cowards" see the evil that war brings to your soul, and want no part in it.

    Now, which is better, being cowards, or mass murdering evil psychopaths?

    And, let us be very clear, the greatest mass murdering evil psychopaths the world has ever known, have been pale faced scum, the likes of you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • As a society crumbles, as bitter divisions grow and disorder spreads and nothing seems to work, anger comes and people begin to want a man who will say “Enough!” and slap down the malefactors–by any means necessary. A man who will make the trains run on time. A man who will make it safe to...
  • I believe that the trigger will be an economic collapse. The west is drowning in debt and the only thing keeping it afloat is massive money printing. This has always ended disastrously in the past.

    This will result in civil unrest, then civil war. There is no doubt in my mind that this war will fracture along racial lines.

    My best guess is that the White response will be to go almost entirely defensive. As we regroup, the freedom loving white men who built this country will take back our culture. We won’t be looking for authority figures.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Never betray your friends to court the favor of your enemies. If you betray your friends, the most principled and perceptive among them will drop you, leaving only the delusional and venal. That is not a good trade, given that the approval you gain is bound to be fleeting and contingent, whereas the contempt and...
  • @Randal

    The pivotal question is did Assad really order the chemical attack.
     
    Only if you think the US should be the self-appointed world policeman.

    Even if Assad did order a chemical attack (which is self-evidently absurd), and even if you think the US being the world's policeman is a great idea (which is stupid because the US has neither the power nor the honesty to do so effectively), it was still totally wrong to respond the way Trump and the US regime did:

    They attacked within two days, long before even the pretence of acting on the basis of anything more than unfounded allegations from untrustworthy sources was credible.

    The attack was a straightforward breach of international law, and the US's treaty obligations.

    The attack was almost certainly in breach of the US constitution, for whatever that is worth these days.

    These things will come back to bite Trump and the US, once all the initial hysterical arousal from neocons and other bomb-lovers subsides.

    Perhaps I was unclear in my wording. My intent was to suggest that the consensus that he did not do it is true.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal
    I don't think you were unclear. I was just pointing out that even if it were true it would not mitigate, still less justify, Trump's egregious crime and blunder.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The pivotal question is did Assad really order the chemical attack. From what I’ve seen the consensus is no.

    What happens when this is proven to be true? How will Trump respond? Can he claim that he was misled by the intelligence community, the Deep State that have been working to remove Assad for years?

    Is it too much to hope that he can use this as a reason to begin draining the swamp in earnest?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal

    The pivotal question is did Assad really order the chemical attack.
     
    Only if you think the US should be the self-appointed world policeman.

    Even if Assad did order a chemical attack (which is self-evidently absurd), and even if you think the US being the world's policeman is a great idea (which is stupid because the US has neither the power nor the honesty to do so effectively), it was still totally wrong to respond the way Trump and the US regime did:

    They attacked within two days, long before even the pretence of acting on the basis of anything more than unfounded allegations from untrustworthy sources was credible.

    The attack was a straightforward breach of international law, and the US's treaty obligations.

    The attack was almost certainly in breach of the US constitution, for whatever that is worth these days.

    These things will come back to bite Trump and the US, once all the initial hysterical arousal from neocons and other bomb-lovers subsides.
    , @RaceRealist88
    >still believing he'll "drain the swamp"

    How is life being so delusional?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Oh boy, that did not take long. As I wrote in February, the Neocons and the US deep state have completely neutered Trump. Just look at these two headlines from RT (and read the articles): ‘It crossed a lot of lines’: Trump on alleged chemical gas attack in Syria ‘We are compelled to take own...
  • @Stephen R. Diamond

    No matter what you think of his boom and bust track record he has been smart enough to claw back billions of dollars of it, creating lots of jobs in the process.
     
    I doubt that the marginal effect of his activities created rather than destroyed jobs.

    But that's entirely beside the point - except demonstrating the "job creator" mentality of some alt-rightists. He must have had some acumen, more than he is showing, to have avoided losing money when he was a developer handling high-risk projects. But that was then. He's now demented.

    [Look at him! is that the visage of a smart man?]

    [Look at him! is that the visage of a smart man?]

    I suppose that you think Hillary Clinton is the visage of a smart woman – the only other choice. Oh wait, I bet George W. Bush is your paragon of smartness.

    I doubt that the marginal effect of his activities created rather than destroyed jobs.

    So how many jobs has Trump created as a businessman?
    A CNNMoney analysis calculates at least 34,000 jobs attributable to the Donald.

    “A more generous estimate would be to view the Trump Organization as a financial services or management company. Then the employment multiplier would be 3. That would bring jobs attributable to Trump to 67,000.”

    http://money.cnn.com/2015/09/03/news/economy/donald-trump-jobs-created/

    It’s up to you guys to show how he has lost more jobs than that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ron Unz


    Still can’t figure out whether he was a fraud all along, or the Deep State/Neocons got to him some how.
     
    Let me get this straight; they got to a 71 y/o multi-billionaire… in 3 months?
     
    A totally ignorant reality-TV star 71 y/o multi-billionaire? Someone who never reads books and watches lots of FoxNews TV? Sure. That's exactly my reading of the situation...

    Your comment has the same bias as left wing MSM, you totally ignore 99% of the facts that do not fit your narrative.

    Most of Trump’s experience is in business. No matter what you think of his boom and bust track record he has been smart enough to claw back billions of dollars of it, creating lots of jobs in the process.

    He did not do this by reading books. He did it by going out and dealing with the movers and shakers of the world. I will wager he has far more firsthand experience with the achievers and scum of the earth than you do.

    I am extremely disappointed with these latest developments. I hope he manages to regain his legs and follow through on the promises that got him elected.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stephen R. Diamond

    No matter what you think of his boom and bust track record he has been smart enough to claw back billions of dollars of it, creating lots of jobs in the process.
     
    I doubt that the marginal effect of his activities created rather than destroyed jobs.

    But that's entirely beside the point - except demonstrating the "job creator" mentality of some alt-rightists. He must have had some acumen, more than he is showing, to have avoided losing money when he was a developer handling high-risk projects. But that was then. He's now demented.

    [Look at him! is that the visage of a smart man?]
    , @Z-man
    Reading books is over rated!

    I am extremely disappointed with these latest developments. I hope he manages to regain his legs and follow through on the promises that got him elected.
     
    Yes I hope so also. He's got to get the Neocon infestation out of the Whitehouse. Buchanan and Giraldi should get a pipeline in to see or at least call him!


    @Stephen R. Diamond
    He's now demented.

    [Look at him! is that the visage of a smart man?]
     

    From the looks of the last few days, especially when he was with King Abdullah, you have a point.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Our country and its Jewish intelligentsia are currently torn by a debate about immigration. On one side the Trump administration is trying to pass executive orders limiting immigration from particular, though certainly not all, Muslim-majority countries while also deporting people — largely from Mexico or Central America — who are in the US illegally. On...
  • @Seamus Padraig
    Actually, the US constitution banned the importation of slaves as of 1807. So no: Southern planters were not guilty of encouraging 'immigration' in the run-up to the Civil War.

    That law was every bit as effective at stopping slave trafficking as the drug laws are at stopping drug trafficking.

    I used the word infest, not import. The real reason for the reduction of the Atlantic route was that slave holders had an even more profitable business of breeding their own. Jimmy The Greek got fired for asserting that they were bred for specific physical traits.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jacques sheete

    The USA is not a fake nation despite the Civil War. Every State entered voluntarily.
     
    Then why couldn't they leave voluntarily or without the threat of violence?

    And do you really think each state did so voluntarily? Did their respective ruling elites have anything to do with it?

    The Civil war was fought to stop traitorous white business owners from continuing to infest this country with black people. Exactly the same kind of traitorous white business owners who are screwing over the white working class today by importing hordes of cheap third world labor.

    The slave problem became the North’s problem as blacks sought freedom in their states.

    I believe Lincoln was assassinated by southern sympathizers because had a plan to remove blacks from this country. This must be true because all talk of removal ceased and the South kept it’s cheap black labor. Southern agro-business then established tenant farming, slavery by another name, and added to it the poor whites who survived the war.

    The Confederate flag does not stand for white pride, it represents traitorous white agro-business. We think southern rednecks are as dumb as dirt because the fat cats got them to do their fighting and dying for them, so they could continue to screw over the white working class.

    Apparently only another civil war will stop the fat cats from screwing over the white working class by importing hordes of cheap third world labor.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    Actually, the US constitution banned the importation of slaves as of 1807. So no: Southern planters were not guilty of encouraging 'immigration' in the run-up to the Civil War.
    , @Sam J.
    "...I believe Lincoln was assassinated by southern sympathizers because had a plan to remove blacks from this country..."

    That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Booth was a Jew. The Jews killed Lincoln.

    As for the author's essay. It's too late to say,"oops we shouldn't have imported so many aliens". They're already here and violence will ensue eventually. Remember that they are responsible for them being here and act accordingly if Whites are violently attacked.
    , @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    If the rich Whites wrecked havoc on the poor ones once before and got away with it, then what makes you think that they won't get away this time... The object of wrath for the Civil War poor Whites were the then slave and not the real culprits; are you similarly planning to target the 'third world' immigrants and not the guilty?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mao Cheng Ji

    The main problem with your argument is that most African and Middle Eastern countries are fake countries, created by European colonial powers as they divvied up the world.
     
    All countries start as 'fake'; look at Italy. It takes time (and effort) for the population to internalize their identity as a citizen and to elevate it above their ethnic and regional identities. It takes generations.

    Bad example, there are 6 active separatist movements in Italy right now spearheaded by these parties: The Friulian Front, Independence Front Lombardy, Sardinia Nation, Sicilian Independentist Movement, South Tyrolean secessionist movement and Liga Veneta. Basically northern Italians want to succeed from Italy.

    There are separatist movements all over the world. Please don’t make me spell them all out for you.

    The USA is not a fake nation despite the Civil War. Every State entered voluntarily. However, it will balkanize because of all the disparate ethnic groups. And just so you know, balkanization refers to another fake country, Yugoslavia, which blew apart rather violently.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mao Cheng Ji

    Countries are not arbitrary designations on a map; and borders are not imaginary lines.
     
    This is true, but not for the reasons you cite; it has nothing to do with demographics.

    Countries are not containers of ethnic identities; countries are autonomous (sovereign) self-governing communities, with their own rules, their own economies, and often with their own philosophies.

    These sovereign communities have a perfect right to regulate immigration; while of course individual members and organization/institutions inside these communities have a perfect right to advocate their favorite immigration policies, including the 'open borders'. None of this has anything to do with your (or anyone else's) ethnic self-identification.

    The main problem with your argument is that most African and Middle Eastern countries are fake countries, created by European colonial powers as they divvied up the world.

    They are all flying apart because of ethnic and sectarian self interests.

    Colonialism and Neo- Colonialism must all be undone. We must all live with our own people in our own cultures.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    The main problem with your argument is that most African and Middle Eastern countries are fake countries, created by European colonial powers as they divvied up the world.
     
    All countries start as 'fake'; look at Italy. It takes time (and effort) for the population to internalize their identity as a citizen and to elevate it above their ethnic and regional identities. It takes generations.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • From their plush apartments, over groaning dinner tables, pseudo-intellectuals have the luxury of depicting squalor and sickness as idyllic, primordially peaceful and harmonious. After all, when the affluent relinquish their earthly possessions to return to the simple life, it is always with aid of sophisticated technology and the option to be air-lifted to a hospital...
  • I will wager that the commenters who decry the evils of colonialism praise neo-colonialism, the colonization of Western Civilization by mass third world immigration.

    It is absurdly ironic that white taxpayers who funded the colonial armies, are now paying for the food, clothing, housing and healthcare of hostile invaders. This supports Mercer’s argument that non-whites benefit from both colonialism and neo-colonialism.

    It must all be undone. We must all live with our own people in our own cultures.

    Read More
    • Agree: woodNfish
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • We have a president who is belligerent towards Iran, who is sending “boots on the ground” to fight ISIS, who loves Israel passionately and who is increasing already bloated defense budgets. If one were a neoconservative, what is there not to like, yet neocons in the media and ensconced comfortably in their multitude of think...
  • @Sherman
    Hey, it's pretty cool that Jews have all this money and power.

    All Giraldi can do about it is cry on a fringe website.

    This smug attitude is why Jews have been kicked out of virtually every country in Europe over the millennia.

    For such supposedly intelligent people they are slow learners. They keep making the same mistakes over and over again.

    History will repeat itself.

    Read More
    • Agree: Cyrano
    • Replies: @Sherman
    Yes, Jews are intelligent. That's why we're all so rich and powerful. Thanks for the kind words.

    I was in a few European countries last month for work.

    I can assure you the Europeans have much bigger problems and concerns these days than hating Jews.

    In fact, I encountered a tremendous amount of respect for Israel on my trip (I work for a European company and we have big and very profitable operations in Israel).

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The U.S. economy is weak. Very weak. But the Federal Reserve is planning to raise interest rates anyway. Why? Here’s what’s going on: According to the Atlanta Fed the US economy is expected to grow at a respectable 2.8 percent for the first quarter of 2017 That’s not bad considering that, for the entire year...
  • It looks to me that the enormous debt bubble that these bankers have created is so toxic that when it pops it is all going to go. The wealth of the elite should evaporate, resulting a massive global reset.

    Can someone out there please explain why these global oligarchs think that they will retain power and control?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    Can someone out there please explain why these global oligarchs think that they will retain power and control?
     
    They know better than you or me when the bubble is going to pop, and you can be sure that they'll have their wealth somewhere else when it does. Billions can shift between currencies and countries with a few clicks, and a private jet doesn't take long to get from New York to London or Zurich.

    When it's all over , I assume that they'll come back to the rescue and buy everything up cheap.
    , @another fred

    Can someone out there please explain why these global oligarchs think that they will retain power and control?
     
    "They", or some portion of them, will retain power because people have huddled themselves into dependent masses crowded into cities. The small, independent farms and local businesses are no longer the core of the economy.

    When TSHTF the people will scream for the government to "do something".

    They will.

    As long as the earth is overcrowded with a dependent population "they", whoever they are, will be in charge. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • See also: Trump Administration Must Use Civil Rights Law To Defend #BasedStickMan, Supporters Against Berkeley Anarcho-Tyranny America is not bound by blood or culture, we are told incessantly, but by a dedication to certain “ideals.” As we can’t even agree on what those ideals are, all that we have to hold us together is the...
  • @Truth
    Why is it that you guys love Indians so much? I never got that.

    At the close of the 19th century, progressives in this country thought the solution for the Indian problem was to fully integrate them into the White culture. In order prosecute their grand plan, they ripped Indian children from their families, sent them to white run schools, cut off their hair and forbade them to speak their own language. These progresso-fascists were determined to dictate to Native-Americans who they were going to live, what they can say and what they could think.

    The Native-American response was “screw you” we will preserve our own cultures. So now what you have in this country are 326 to 567 sovereign Native-American nations, depending on how you define them. These nations are not multicultural and diverse. They are totally racist and xenophobic. There are hundreds of them because they won’t even live with each other. The one common theme I perceive is to live independently of other cultures, and I support this.

    The bottom line is this: Whenever these progresso-fascists assert that White Nationalism or separatism is a non-starter, there are hundreds of sovereign Native-American nations that prove them wrong.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    The Native-American response was “screw you” we will preserve our own cultures. So now what you have in this country are 326 to 567 sovereign Native-American nations, depending on how you define them. These nations are not multicultural and diverse. They are totally racist and xenophobic. There are hundreds of them because they won’t even live with each other. The one common theme I perceive is to live independently of other cultures, and I support this.
     
    My friend, this reads like one of those 1950s Disney movies with Tab Hunter wearing greasepaint. I am not flabbergasted often, but here, I don't even know where to start...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I consider myself to be a White Nationalist. However, in the interest of preserving all traditional cultures, true multiculturalism, I am considering bequeathing 3 acres of my land to the local Indian tribe.

    Anyone of you out there have strong opinions about that?

    Read More
    • Replies: @daniel le mouche
    yes, though i love the indians, would you consider passing it on to me and my family? we might just be able to make a living out of it. also, it sounds as if you have enough to spare and are kind-hearted, so why not consider a white (german-irish) brother in need, in fact quite desperate? (though i think we'd likely become friends)
    , @Truth
    Why is it that you guys love Indians so much? I never got that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.