The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Anatoly Karlin Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eric Margolis Forum Fred Reed Agnostic DavidB P-ter Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson JayMan John Derbyshire Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Razib Khan Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski Steve Sailer The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Ben Freeman Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David Irving David Lorimer David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jared Taylor Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Pilger John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Rothrock Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Mark Weber Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election Alt Right American Media American Military Anti-Semitism Blacks Books China Conspiracy Theories Crime Culture Donald Trump Economics Education Foreign Policy Genetics History Human Biodiversity Ideology Illegal Immigration Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Miscellaneous Movies Neocons Obama Open Thread Political Correctness Political Economy Politics Race/Ethnicity Real Estate Russia Science Sports Syria Terrorism Ukraine World War II 2008 Election 2010 Census 2012 Election 2012 US Elections 23andMe 9/11 A Farewell To Alms A Song Of Ice And Fire A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Academia Access Journalism Acheivement Gap Achievement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Adaptation Addiction Admin Administration ADMIXTOOLS Admixture Adoptees Adoption AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Aging Agriculture AIDS Ainu AIPAC Aircraft Carriers Airports Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexei Kudrin Alexei Navalny Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com American Atheists American Exceptionalism American History American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Pravda American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Anti-Gentilism Anti-Vaccination Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Apartheid Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Architecture Arctic Resources Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Arkham's Razor Armenia Army Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Ask A ScienceBlogger ASPM Assange Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attila The Hun Attractive Nuisance Doctrine Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Asiatic Austro-Hungarian Empire Autism Automation Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Azerbaijan Babes And Hunks Babri Masjid Baby Gap Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Poetry Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltics Baltimore Riots Banana Republicans Bangladesh Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Barbarians Barone Baseball Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables Basque Baumeister BDS Movement Beauty Behavior Genetics Behavioral Economics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Ben Cardin Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Benjamin Netanyahu Berezovsky Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders #BernieSoWhite Beta Males BICOM Big History BigPost Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Biodiversity Bioethics Biology Birth Order Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims #BlackJobsMatter #BlackLiesMurder Blade Runner Blog Blogging Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology boats-in-the-water bodybuilding Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Border Security Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brahmans Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brezhnev Brian Boutwell BRICs Brighter Brains Britain Burakumin Burma Bush Bush Administration Business Cagots California Californication Cambodia Cameron Russell Camp Of The Saints Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada #Cancel2022WorldCupinQatar Cancer Candida Albicans Capitalism Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carlos Slim Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catfight Catholic Church Catholicism Caucasus Cavaliers Cecil Rhodes Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Chetty Chicagoization Child Labor Children China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Economy Chinese Evolution Chinese History Chinese IQ Chinese Language Chinese People Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Stringer Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Circumcision Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilization CJIA Clannishness Clans Class Classical History Climate Climate Change Clinton Cliodynamics Clovis clusterfake Coal Coalition Coalition Of The Fringes Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cognitive Science Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission Colonialism Color Revolution Columba Bush Comments Communism Community Reinvestment Act Compton Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Conquistador-American Consanguinity Consequences Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Convergence Core Article Cornel West Corruption Corruption Perception Index Counterpunch Cousin Marriage Cover Story Creationism CRIF Crimea Crimean Tatars Crimethink Crisis Crispr Crops crops-rotting-in-the-fields Cruise Missiles Crying Among The Farmland Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuckold Envy Cuckoldry Cuckservative Cultural Anthropology Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dana Milbank Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Darwinism Data Data Analysis Data Posts David Foster Wallace David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Irving David Kramer David Lane David Moser David Petraeus Davide Piffer De Ploribus Unum Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire Deep Sleep Deep South Deep State Demic Diffusion Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Justice Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Detroit Development Developmental Noise Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dick Cheney Dienekes Diet Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination discussion Disease Disney Disparate Impact Displaced And Refugees Dissent Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Dmitry Medvedev DNA Dodecad Dogs Dollar Donme Dopamine Down Syndrome Dr James Thompson Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Drone War Drones Drought Drugs DSM DTC Personal Genomics Duterte Dylan Roof Dynasty Dysgenic E-books E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians Eastern Europe Ebola Ecology Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economic Theory Economy Ed Miller Edward Gibbon Edward Price Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Efraim Diveroli Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Eisenhower Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy Energy England Enhanced Interrogations Environment Environmentalism Epigenetics Epistemology Erdogan EROEI Espionage Estonia Estrogen Ethics Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Genomics European History European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Genomics Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News fallout False Flag Attack Family Family Matters Fantasy Far Abroad Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Shaming FBI FDA Federal Reserve Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response FEMEN Feminism Feminists Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Feuds Fiction Fields Medals FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland Finn Baiting Finnish Content First Amendment First World War FISA Fitness Flight From White Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football Forecasts Foreign Policy Foreign Service Fracking France Francis Gary Powers Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Freakonomics Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Canadians French Paradox Friday Fluff Friendly & Conventional Front National Frontlash Funny Futurism Gaddafi Game Game Of Nations Game Of Thrones Gangs Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gemayel Clan Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gender Relations Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Social Survey Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic History Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George R. R. Martin George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Gina Haspel Gladwell Glenn Beck Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization GMO God Delusion Golf Google Google Data Explorer Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Graphs GRE Great Leap Forward #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greeks Green Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection GSS Guangzhou Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gypsies H-1B H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Half Sigma Halloween Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule HammerHate Hanzi Happiness Harappa Ancestry Project Harriet Tubman Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara hate Hate Crimes hate-fraud hate-hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech HateStat Havelock Ellis Hbd Hbd Chick Hbd Fallout HBDchick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heather Norton Hegira Height Height Privilege Helmuth Nyborg Henry Harpending Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah Hillary Clinton Himachal Pradesh Hindu Caste System Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Hist kai Historical Genetics Historical Population Genetics Hitler Hodgepodge Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate homicides Homophobia Homosexuality Houellebecq House Intelligence Committee Housing Hox Hoxby HplusNRx Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Hug Thug Human Achievement human-capital Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genome Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Variation Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hybridization Hypocrisy Hypodescent I Love Italians I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan Ibn Khaldun Ibo Ice T Iceland Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Igor Strelkov Ilana Mercer IMF immigrants Immigration immigration-policy-terminology Immigriping Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Incest Income India India Genetics Indian Economy Indian Genetics Indian Genomics Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-European Indo-Europeans Indonesia industrialization Inequality Infection Theory Inflation Infrastructure inosmi Intellectuals Intelligence International Affairs International Comparisons International Relations Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Interracial Marriage Intersectionality Interviews Introgression Inuit Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Invasive Species Ioannis Metaxas Iosef Stalin Iosif Lazaridis Iosif Stalin Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Is It Good For The Jews? Is Love Colorblind ISIS. Terrorism Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamist-liberal Alliance Islamophobia Islamophobiaphobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying IT Italy J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Mattis James Watson James Wooley Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. JCPOA ¡Jeb! Jeb Bush Jeffrey Shuren Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Kasich John Kerry John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Michael Greer John Tooby John Updike Jonathan Pollard Joseph McCarthy Journalism Judaism Judge George Daniels Judicial System Judith Harris Julia Ioffe Kaboom Kalash Katz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kenneth Pomeranz Kennewick Man Kerry Killinger Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson Kids These Days Kim Jong Un Kin Selection Kindle Kinship Kissing Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kremlin Clans Ksenia Sobchak Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell LA Lady Gaga Lame Jesse Jackson Imitations Lame News Language Languages Larry Summers Las Vegas Massacre Late Obama Age Collapse Late Ov Latin America Latinos Latvia Law Law Of Supply And Demand Law Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lazy Glossophiliac Lead Poisoning Learning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left/Right Lenin Lesbians Lèse-diversité LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberal Opposition Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Linguistics Links Literacy Literature Litvinenko Living Standards Lloyd Blankfein Logan's Run Loooong Books Looting Lorde Love Dolls Lover Boys Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. Machiavellianism Mad Men Madeleine Albright Madoff Magritte Mahmoud Abbas Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Malnutrition Malthusianism Manor Manorialism Manspreading Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marcomentum! Marijuana Marine Le Pen mark-adomanis Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marketing Major Postmodernism Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Barghouti Marxism Masculinity Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Math Mathematics Matthew Weiner Max Blumenthal Max Boot Mayans McCain McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Media Medicine Medvedev Mega-Aggressions Megan Fox Megyn Kelly MEK Melanesians Melanin Memorial Day Men With Gold Chains Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Mesolithic Mexican-American War Mexican Mediocrity Mexico MH 17 Michael Anton Michael Flynn Michael Jackson Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michelle Bachmann Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarization Military Military Analysis Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millionaires Milner Group Minimum Wage Minorities Mirror Neurons Misdreavus Missile Defense Missing The Point Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Model Minority Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moore's Law Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Moxie Moynihan's Law Of The Canadian Border Mozilo MTDNA Mulatto Elite Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Multiregionalism Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai Myanmar NAEP NAMs Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Natalism National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Immigration Safety And Quality Board National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture navalny Naz Shah Nazi Nazism Nbc News Neandertal Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Ned Flanders Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neolithic Revolution Neoreaction Nerds Netherlands Neuroscience New Atheists New Cold War New Rules New Silk Road New World New World Order New York New York City New York Times News Neymar Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nieto Nigeria Night In The Museum Nikki Haley NIMBY Nobel Prize Nobel Prized #NobelsSoWhiteMale Nordics North Africa North Korea Northwest Europe Norway #NotOkay Novorossiya Sitrep NSA Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nurture Assumption Nutrition O Mio Babbino Caro Obamacare Obamanomics Obesity Obey Giant! Obituary Obscured American Occam's Butterknife Occam's Razor Occam's Rubber Room Occupy Oil Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders Operational Sex Ratio Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orissa Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden Out-of-Africa Out Of Africa Model Out Of African Outbreeding Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Paleoamerindians Paleoanthropology Paleolibertarianism Paleolithic Paleolithic Europeans Paleontology Palestine Palestinians Palin Pamela Geller Panama Papers Panhandling Paper Review Parasite Manipulation Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Parsi Partly Inbred Extended Family Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Pax Americana Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Perception Management Personal Personal Genomics Personality Peter Frost Peter Turchin P&G Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Philosophy Philosophy Of Science Phylogenetics Pigmentation Pigs Piketty Pioneer Hypothesis PISA Pizzagate Planned Parenthood Poetry Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Philosophy Politicians Polls Polygamy Polygenic Score Polygyny Poor Reading Skills Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Population Structure Population Substructure Populism Porn Pornography Portugal Post 201 Post-Modernism Post-Nationalism Poverty PRC Prediction Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Prester John Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Productivity Profiling Progressives Projection Pronoun Crisis Propaganda Prostitution Protectionism protest Protestantism Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome Putinsliv Pygmies Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec R. A. Fisher Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ race-realism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Profiling Racial Reality Racism Racist Objects Menace Racist Pumpkin Incident Radical Islam Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Raqqa Rationality Razib Khan R&D Reader Survey Reading RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red State Blue State redlining Redneck Dunkirk Refugee Boy Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome #RefugeesWelcomeInQatar Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Replication Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Party Republicans Responsibility Retconning Reuel Gerecht Review Revisionism Revolution Of 1905 Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Russell RIP rise-of-the-rest Ritholtz Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roger Ailes Rohingya Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Rome Romney Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Ross Perot Rotherham Rove Roy Moore RT International Rushton Russell Kirk Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Economy Russian Elections 2018 Russian Far East Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Politics Russian Reaction Russian Society Russian Spies Russophobes Ruth Benedict Saakashvili sabermetrics Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Sammy Sosa San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf Sarah Palin Sarin Gas SAT Satoshi Kanazawa Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Schizophrenia School Science Denialism Science Fiction Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Select Select Post Selection Self-obsession Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sergey Brin Sex Sex Differences Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Sibel Edmonds Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Mothers Single Women Six Day War SJWs Skin Color Skin Tone Skunk Works Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Smart Fraction Smoking Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Solzhenitsyn Songun Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South Asian Genetics South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet History Soviet Union Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain SPLC Sport Sputnik News Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Comparisons State Department State Formation States Rights Statistics Statue Of Liberty Statue Of Libertyism Statute Of Diversity Statute Of Immigration Statute Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Pinker Steven Spielberg Steve's Rice Thresher Columns Still Not Free Buddy Strategic Affairs Ministry Student Loans Stuff White People Like Stuxnet Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Submission Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subrealism Suicide Supercomputers Superintelligence Supreme Court Survey Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Syed Farook syr Syrian Civil War Syriza T.S. Eliot Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tajikistan Taki Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev Tamil Nadu Tashfeen Malik Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Television Terrorists Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Better Angels Of Our Nature The Bible The Black Autumn The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Deep South The Economist The Eight Banditos The Future The Golfocaust The Kissing Billionaire The Left The Megaphone The New York Times The Saker The Scramble For America The Son Also Rises The South The Washington Post The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Thermoeconomics Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Jefferson Thomas Perez Thomas Talhelm Thurgood Marshall Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Tiger Woods TIMSS TNC Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Hanks Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transsexuals Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling Tropical Humans Trudeau True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tsarnaev Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twintuition Twitter UK UKIP Ukrainian Crisis Unanswerable Questions Unbearable Whiteness Underperformin' Norman Mineta Unemployment Union Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universal Basic Income Universalism unwordly Upper Paleolithic Urbanization US Blacks US Civil War II US Elections 2016 US-Russia.org Expert Discussion Panel USA Used Car Dealers Moral Superiority Of USS Liberty Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Variation Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victor Canfield Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Violence Vioxx Virginia Tech Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Vladimir Putin Vladimir Zhirinovsky Voronezh Vote Fraud Vulcan Society W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wall Street War War In Donbass War On Terror Warhol Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watson Watsoning Waugh Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Westerns Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Death White Helmets White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy Whites Who Is The Fairest Of Them All? Who Whom Why We Can't Have Nice Things Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class World Cup World Values Survey World War G World War I World War III World War T Wretched Refuse Wretched Refuseism Writing WSJ WTF WTO WVS Xi Jinping Y Chromosome Yamnaya Yankees Yemen Yezidis Yochi Dreazen You Maniacs You Blew It Up Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies
Nothing found
"Anonymous White Male"
Comments
• My
Comments
153 Comments • 21,700 Words •  RSS
(Commenters may request that their archives be hidden by contacting the appropriate blogger)
All Comments
 All Comments
    Imagine that a nominee for secretary of state had shared platforms with white nationalist Richard B. Spencer and been given a major award by his National Policy Institute, which describes itself as "an independent organization dedicated to the heritage, identity, and future of people of European descent in the United States and around the world."...
  • @Avery
    {I think the Unz Review should provide commentary by the links to their threads. }

    If you read Unz.com somewhat regularly, you should be able to figure out what the articles/authors advocate, without additional commentary. Ron puts a lot of stuff out there for anyone who wants to read - to read. That is why it is an interesting site to visit. If he advocated some particular thread (...philosophy, idea, movement,...),, the site would become uninteresting and monotonous in short order.


    { It would help me ignore them .......}

    Again, you should be able to figure out from the title or a few words in the opening paragraph what the author is advocating. For example, when I saw this in the sub-title 'Islamophobia Enters the Government,.....', I knew immediately what the author is going to advocate or complain about - because the bogus word 'Islamophobia' was manufactured to disarm any resistance to Islamization of non-Muslim societies, particularly Western/Christian societies.
    I therefor did not waste time reading the article. Yeah, sometimes you miss out on some interesting stuff if you skip the entire article, but to me the cost/benefit of that decision works out.

    The problem is that you don’t know if something is irony until you’ve read too many sentences. Of course, the guy was jewish so that should have been a clue, too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I think the Unz Review should provide commentary by the links to their threads. Something like, “This guy is a douche. Ron just posts stuff like this to show what stupid twats are writing these days.” It would help me ignore them so I don’t waste any time reading some cut and paste wanker that wouldn’t know his ass from a hole in the ground.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {I think the Unz Review should provide commentary by the links to their threads. }

    If you read Unz.com somewhat regularly, you should be able to figure out what the articles/authors advocate, without additional commentary. Ron puts a lot of stuff out there for anyone who wants to read - to read. That is why it is an interesting site to visit. If he advocated some particular thread (...philosophy, idea, movement,...),, the site would become uninteresting and monotonous in short order.


    { It would help me ignore them .......}

    Again, you should be able to figure out from the title or a few words in the opening paragraph what the author is advocating. For example, when I saw this in the sub-title 'Islamophobia Enters the Government,.....', I knew immediately what the author is going to advocate or complain about - because the bogus word 'Islamophobia' was manufactured to disarm any resistance to Islamization of non-Muslim societies, particularly Western/Christian societies.
    I therefor did not waste time reading the article. Yeah, sometimes you miss out on some interesting stuff if you skip the entire article, but to me the cost/benefit of that decision works out.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I recently was asked to speak at an online conference entitled Deep Truth: Encountering Deep State Lies. My panel addressed Understanding Zionism: Deconstructing the Power Paradigm and my own topic was How Jewish Power Sustains the Israel Narrative. Working on my presentation, I was forced to confront the evolution of my own views on both...
  • This is off topic, but I came to Unz today to see if there was any North Korea news. I’ve quit coming to Unz as often as I used to because I just got tired of the poseurs that saw themselves as foreign policy experts and arm-chair generals. I wanted to see what the storyline is now from those same poseurs that declared how insane Kim Jong-un was. “Oh, he’s a madman that will destroy the world! Reeeeee….” At the time, whenever I would read such a specious post, I would say that Kim was not insane, he was pragmatic, and anyone who thought he was insane was just someone that read a lot of sound bites and fake news and regurgitated them. I’m hoping for a North Korean thread soon to see what the past “experts” will tell us now. Remember, just because you watch and read a lot of disinformation doesn’t make you an expert.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In early 2016, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced his country would no longer bomb the Islamic State. Defending this decision, the prime minister stated: “Call us old-fashioned, but we think that we ought to avoid doing precisely what our enemies want us to do. They want us to elevate, to give in to fear,...
  • “If You Fight Your Enemies, They Win”

    Not if they’re dead.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • During the long Cold War many Russians grew sufficiently disenchanted with the lies and omissions of their own news outlets that they turned to Western radio for a glimpse of the truth. The growth of the Internet has now provided Americans with a similar opportunity to click on a foreign website and discover the important...
  • Mr. Unz:

    I find it hard to believe that you have only been exposed to this information in the last 6 to 7 years. This information has been in play for decades. I know that I was first exposed to it about 30 years ago. I’m sure you would have considered the sources to be “conspiracy theories”, but when “conspiracy theories” are finally accepted, what do they become then? History? Not yet. There are still too many non-thinkers that are convinced that America is the good guy, and too many traitors that know it is the truth but can’t let it become History that will never allow the truth to be revealed until about two generations after the fact. It is like Schopenhauer’s quote:
    “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The United States has launched a three-pronged offensive on Russia. First, it's attacking Russia's economy via sanctions and oil-price manipulation. Second, it's increasing the threats to Russia's national security by arming and training militant proxies in Syria and Ukraine, and by encircling Russia with NATO forces and missile systems. And, third, it's conducting a massive...
  • During the War of Northern Aggression, Britain and France supported the South, Russia supported the North. Let’s just admit that all the players in the Great Game interfere with and engage in behavior that benefits the rulers in their own country at the expense of other countries/economic entities. The only difference now is that nationalism is frowned upon by “polite society” that supports a global financial entity at the expense of the rulers in a particular country. But, the title of this article could have been the “Russia’s Century-Long War on America”, if written by another person.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • From Real Clear Politics: Commenter WorkingClass observes: Yeah, but he can only go transgender like that wonderfully courageous Caitlyn Jenner, not tr
  • “Pelosi: My Grandson’s Birthday Wish Was To Have Brown Skin, Brown Eyes; “Face Of The Future Of Our Country”

    Gee, that doesn’t sound very diverse. I thought ol’ crinkle face wanted the World to celebrate diversity? Or did I just dream that?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • People sitting in cafes in Baghdad under the rule of Saddam Hussein used to be nervous of accidentally spilling their cup of coffee over the front page of the newspaper spread out in front of them. They had a good reason for their anxiety because Iraqi newspapers at that time always carried a picture of...
  • Apparently, Andrew’s cock burns. Antibiotics can often help that. I think Rob Reiner must write this fool’s material. It is no different.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ToivoS
    Andrew?? You must be referring to Patrick's younger brother. He has nothing to do with this article.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • With regard to Mr. Trump’s Border Wall, I am skeptical. Now, I freely concede that I am not an authority on Border Walls. In fact, I have never built a Border Wall. This may surprise readers. Yet it is true. So all that follows is in the nature of speculation. Be warned. Still, though I...
  • Let’s be honest. The only reason Fred is so engaged in this issue is because he married down and doesn’t want to have that rubbed in his face. Making a political decision that Mexicans and other mestizos do not benefit this country forces him to have to justify his !Jeb¡ decision.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • From something called Pajiba, an article about the upcoming Spielberg movie The Post, with Meryl Streep as Washington Post owner Katharine Graham and Tom Hanks as editor Ben Bradlee. Bob Odenkirk (Better Call Saul) is fourth-billed as reporter Ben Bagdikian: Bob Odenkirk is Fantastic in ‘The Post,’ and He Also Shouldn’t Have Been Cast By...
  • @Wilkey
    Biggest flight from white involves white britons who cast blacks as historical britons

    In the Hollow Crown series of Shakespearean histories Sophie Okonedo plays Queen Margaret in Henry VI (parts 1-3) and in Richard III. Okonedo is half Jewish but is not remotely passable as a 15th Century English queen.

    Then of course there was Alonzo Greer playing a black dude in ancient Britain in the "Roar" (alongside Heath Ledger and Vera Farmiga), and Angel Coulby as a black Guinevere in the BBC show "Merlin" - though I would give fantasies a lot more leeway than serious drama.

    We laugh at all of this, to some degree, but the sad fact is that 20 years from now there will be a lot of people running around who believe that blacks were all over the place in ancient Britain, and there are more than a few people who are happy to have it that way.

    “Historian”, and I use that term ironically, Mary Beard was used to promote the concept that Roman Britain contained negroes because there were African Romans. Of course, an African Roman would be a Berber or a descendent of the Carthaginians, or any other light skinned variants. She, and the BBC, used her “pedigree” to promote “multiculturalism” in Britain. The probability that there was a black Roman soldier in Britain may not be zero, but it is so minuscule that it could not be used to support the presence of negroes in Roman Britain unless, of course, there was a desire to promote the fact that Great Britain was not created by those of Germanic/Celtic/White descent. Which it was. This is political propaganda at its most obvious.

    https://imgur.com/tg25juJ

    In addition, you have the following disinformation passed off as reality:

    – Sub-Saharan Celts http:
    – A Sub-Saharan English Nobleman, 1215AD
    – A Sub-Saharan blacksmith, Iron Age Britain
    – A North-African Norman priest

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The path forward for the Democrats is clear. They need to accept responsibility for their humiliating defeat to Donald Trump and move on. That means they need to stop passing the buck and make a solid effort to reconnect with the millions of disillusioned ex-Dems in the center of the country who either didn’t vote,...
  • Mike Whitney is from Washington State. For those of you that think his post may be tongue-in-cheek, how can you tell with someone from Washington? Most of the population in that State has been infected with SJW. I’ve read another article of his on this site. It started out as reasonable, but before the end, he had dropped the turd in the punchbowl and you realized he had been infected with the virus.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jimbojones
    Seattle is very blue, but the rest of Washington is Trump country.
    https://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/washington/

    To a significant extent, the American red-blue divide is a rural-urban divide.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • For Americans concerned about Mexico and Mexicans, and what sort of wights they be, a little history may help. We seem to know almost nothing about a bordering nation of 130 million. It is not what most of us think it is. It is certainly not what the Loon Right would have us believe. For...
  • “For many years, until 1910, Mexico was run by Europeans, lastly under Porfirio Diaz, for the benefit of Europeans.”

    Still is, as you can see from these pictures. Look at the section titled Modern Mexico 1934 – present.

    https://infogalactic.com/info/List_of_heads_of_state_of_Mexico

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Here's a question. In pop culture history, there are countless male-male songwriting teams -- Rodgers-Hart/Hammerstein, Lennon-McCartney, Jagger-Richards, Page-Plant, Strummer-Jones, etc. And there are some male-female songwriting pairs, such as Comden-Green, Goffin-King, and Mann-Weil. But are there any female-female songwriting teams? I imagine there must be, but they are definitely rare. Why do women write so...
  • So many commentators try to either ignore the fact that the post deals with female/female writing partnerships by bringing up single female songwriters, like Joni Mitchell. It doesn’t disprove the premise. Also, the mere handful of female/female collaborators proves the rule. The truth is, female musical composers are a rarity. I would ask anyone to name a MAJOR female composer, but I know someone would name a insignificantly minor female composer. And this is not to say that women can not be musical virtuosos. In fact, I believe if you just examined the numbers of female vs. male pianists, you would find that more girls actually study piano when they are younger. It’s like dance. It’s one of the preferred female “activities”. It was even more noticeable in the 19th century, before TV and female “liberation”.

    I believe that there are few real female composers for the same reason that there are few real female comedians. And the comedians that are female are often lesbian. Testosterone is necessary for creation. Females don’t create. They incubate.

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    "Females don't create. They incubate"

    That's why the most famous female classical musicians, like Clara Schumann and Nadia Boulanger, are known for being inspirers and teachers of Great Men, in addition to being virtuosos, instead of composers. Composition is masculine.
    , @YetAnotherAnon
    "I would ask anyone to name a MAJOR female composer"

    You have to go back a long way.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hildegard_of_Bingen

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei88J4lERbk

    , @honesthughgrant
    You'd be hard to find many females at the head of any human endeavor. Males seem to dominate on both sides the IQ Bell Curve. But the lack of women composers/songwriters is somewhat surprising. The field is a meritocracy, everyone wants good songs and good music. Women are especially interested in music and it takes no heavy lifting or academic training.

    I wonder why Comden needed a male partner to write a screenplay or song lyrics. I'd suspect it might have been because she was the less talented half.

    , @blank-misgivings
    Too much of a generalization I think. It's probably mental module specific. In visual art and composing music men dominated and continue to dominate despite lessening of any social barriers to involvement, but in fiction and poetry women have some impressive achievements in the last 200 years or so (Dickinson, Austen, Marianne Moore, Woolf, to name but four,who can equal anything the men had to offer in their eras).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Michelle Goldberg. Here's a sample of Michelle Goldberg's output, from iSteve:
  • @eric
    Did ya see the new building named after the 'Hidden Figures' hero, Katherine Johnson? She's supposedly black, but looks whiter than typical European old folk.

    That’s because most “blacks” totted out as a “credit to their race” aren’t even of that race. They are mixed breeds and, because they are mixed, they are more intelligent and better looking. Not that Hidden Figures had any basis in fact, but it is funny how even the left won’t use blacks as role models. Like the gay mulatto.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Like many Americans during the past three weeks, I've been bombarded by news about the destructive power of Hurricane Harvey in Texas and Hurricane Irma in Florida. The stories are of misery, death and destruction. The misery, death and destruction are acutely difficult to accept because they have been visited upon innocents. I say that...
  • @Authenticjazzman
    " You're a pseudo-intellectual that doesn't even know what you don't know"

    So what you are really implying is that anyone who does not believe in your version of "God" is then a so-called "Pseudo-intellectual".

    Well the truth of this issue is thus : There is no external separate "God", rather every single human being is creating their own actual individual universe, complete with stars planets and the suns, and each human being is then the "God" of their own personal universe.

    This means that within this space arrangement there are roughly seven billion universes, and they are all overlapping and imposed upon each other, so a to lend the effect of there being only one universe, and each one of these universes has it's own creator and "God", those being : you, me, and every other individual located within these multiple universes.

    By the way, precisely who told your God that he could only have one son, seeing as "Gods" can do anything, your God should have been capable of creating millions of sons, and not being just limited to only one son, and then all of this talk about him having given his "Only son" to atone for our sins would have been superfluous.

    And also the question of : If Jesus was going around and performing miracles, one after the other, raising the dead, walking on water, multiplying fish, water to wine, if he was able to accomplish all of these miraculous feats, why was he, all of a sudden, after he was arrested, unable to perform any more miracles, such as flying up and off of the cross, or creating a mock-up of himself, to be beaten and whipped by the crowds.

    Of course your answers to these questions will be : These are mysteries which only God can understand.

    To be continued.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, Airborne trained US Army vet, and pro jazz aritist.

    No, I call someone a pseudo-intellectual when they claim there is no evidence for something and then claim that this is evidence for what they believe in. I also call someone that ends all his posts with “Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, Airborne trained US Army vet, and pro jazz aritist” someone that has some insecurities and can’t let his words speak for themselves. Then you compound your misinformed post by saying:

    “Well the truth of this issue is thus : There is no external separate “God”, rather every single human being is creating their own actual individual universe, complete with stars planets and the suns, and each human being is then the “God” of their own personal universe.

    This means that within this space arrangement there are roughly seven billion universes, and they are all overlapping and imposed upon each other, so a to lend the effect of there being only one universe, and each one of these universes has it’s own creator and “God”, those being : you, me, and every other individual located within these multiple universes.”

    Oh, you’ve seen/experienced this and can manipulate these universe yourself? No? I didn’t think so. You can imagine I’m going trust you to tell me about something you know nothing about. You’re going to tell me the “truth” of the entire nature of existence you’ve based on Eastern religious thought, science attempting to postulate things it cannot measure, and some mental masturbation common with self-righteous people. Let me repeat myself so you won’t misconstrue what I am saying.

    You and pseudo boy don’t have a clue about the nature of the universe except the experiences you have had. I don’t have a clue about the universe except the experiences I have had. However, when someone claims to “know” the truth, as of course you obviously do (sarc), and criticizes someone for having a different seat at the table than you do, you show you are no different than the person you criticize. We might ask you why you felt you had to pontificate on this issue. You and pseudo boy assume something that was not in evidence and then proceed to inform us of your “Mensa level” understanding of the nature of the cosmos. I assure you, you have none. Just like me. And atheists are among the most egregiously obnoxious true-believers, exceeded only, possibly, by Scientologists. Maybe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    Okay so your religious informs you that we humans are " Made in the image and likeness of god", so perhaps you could tell us just why your God is endowed with male reproductive organs, and women are not made in the image and likeness of God seeing as they are not endowed with said organs, or are these phenomena simply attributed to another "Mystery" which humans are unable to comprehend.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz musician.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • No, we do not agree that Christianity is no better or worse than worshipping the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Firstly, because you yourself do not believe in the FSM. It is your attempt at preening and saying “Look, aren’t I witty”. No, you’re not. You do enjoy mental masturbation, though. And as far as being no worse than believing Christianity, does your belief provide an ethical and moral framework for people to structure their lives around? I’m sure that you’ve heard that if religion didn’t exist it would have to be created? Maybe you could codify the FSM’s instructions to his/her/xer followers?

    You are an atheist and you know it. You proved it when you commented

    “I did not declare “what is not”. I declared that there is no solid evidence of a Supreme Being – Christian or otherwise. That is a fact that can be verified along the lines of, “there is no water in this glass.” I did not declare that there is certainly no God.”

    So, there is no Supreme Being but you did not declare that there is certainly no God. You are just playing with semantics. If you don’t believe in a Supreme Being but you do believe in a God, you are splitting hairs. And, if you don’t believe in a God, that’s fine. It’s your choice. If you cannot look at creation and see a Creator, there’s nothing I can say that will convince you, so I don’t waste my time. My feeling is that I can see order and structure in Nature which did not occur by chance. It requires more faith for me to believe this is all a matter of chance than that everything evinces an intelligence. I could almost believe that life was created from matter by accident if the only life form that existed was an amoeba like creature. However, where did the matter come from? Just always was? Isn’t that an assumption based on no evidence? But the complexity of our bodies, the interrelatedness of things in Nature, and the order of the cosmos rules that out for me.

    “Given no solid evidence of a supreme being over hundreds of years, one could confidently say that it is very, very unlikely that there is a supreme being.”

    This is more evidence of your mental masturbation. No solid evidence? How would you define this? Do you actually think that a finite mind such as yours can understand God? That is just hubris. You don’t even understand who and what you are, much less someone or something beyond time and space. Again, you are claiming that “non-evidence” is “evidence”. That is your faith. Whatever. Just remember you can’t use the excuse that just because you don’t believe in God you aren’t attached to a “faith”, which is what you will try to do. Faith has multiple definitions. For instance,

    1. confidence or trust in a person or THING – thing, like your confidence in your opinion.
    2. belief that is not based on proof – your only “proof” is “non-proof”.
    3. belief in anything, as a code of ethics, standards of merit, etc – do you want me to point this out to you or can you be honest?

    You top off your screed with

    “Also, given the complete lack of solid evidence, and by this I mean an appearance in person, or some other evidence that would reliably show cause and effect for example, all these “Holy Scriptures” are nothing more than comic book stuff and human philosophy”

    Would you even recognize an appearance in person? If someone exists in multiple non-physical dimensions, how would your eyes and ears discern them? And I’m sure you’re not honest enough to admit that your embrace of Darwinism is also nothing more than comic book stuff and human philosophy. Perhaps you can point to anything Darwin said, other than survival of the fittest, for which there is any solid evidence? Transitional forms? When and where? I also find it amusing that you won’t give any credence to historical evidence of Jesus but you will with the Trojan War.

    Sorry, atheism is just an attempt to shore up your ego. God has not revealed himself to you or asked your meaningless opinion about life. You resent that. All ego. Just remember that the adversary said if you do this, ye shall be as gods. That is your need. You're a pseudo-intellectual that doesn't even know what you don't know.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Scalpel
    Ok, I will stop here. I go by the motto, "Never argue with fools. They will bring you down to their level, then beat you on experience." You win
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @The Scalpel
    I am not an atheist. I believe in the flying spaghetti monster. Please explain to me why my beliefs are inferior to those of Christians

    Did I say your beliefs were inferior to Christians? What did I say? Go back and read it. What I said was in response to your Godlike statement of “It is all faith based on no evidence”. As is atheism. You consider yourself an intellectual, obviously. But, you are incapable of recognizing that declaring what “is not” is just as non-evidence based as declaring what “is”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Scalpel
    Ok, so we agree that Christianity is no better or worse than worshipping the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

    I did not declare "what is not". I declared that there is no solid evidence of a Supreme Being - Christian or otherwise. That is a fact that can be verified along the lines of, "there is no water in this glass." I did not declare that there is certainly no God. I will say that using the same logic, one cannot be certain of anything.

    Yet, humanity does advance scientifically. We do this based on probabilities. Given no solid evidence of a supreme being over hundreds of years, one could confidently say that it is very, very unlikely that there is a supreme being. Put another way, one could say it is very, very likely that there is no supreme being.

    Also, given the complete lack of solid evidence, and by this I mean an appearance in person, or some other evidence that would reliably show cause and effect for example, all these "Holy Scriptures" are nothing more than comic book stuff and human philosophy
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @The Scalpel
    I believe it is all a result of the Great Flying Spaghetti Monster. After all, there is more concrete existence of the great flying spaghetti monster than the God of the Christian Bible. I can just hear all the Christians out there saying that my statement is ridiculous. But what is it about the Christian Bible gives it any credibility at all aside from a fairly inaccurate history of regular people? It is all faith based on no evidence.

    As is atheism. When you people have the honesty to admit this, maybe you’ll STFU. Who am I kidding? Those that “know” what is NOT are no different than those who “know” what IS.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Scalpel
    I am not an atheist. I believe in the flying spaghetti monster. Please explain to me why my beliefs are inferior to those of Christians
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “For an atheist who rejects the dogma of mind/body dualism, the fantasy of a “soul” and afterlife, what’s to fear in and of death. Death is nothingness, oblivion, the cessation of consciousness, the end of pain and suffering, liberation and surcease from the “hell that is other people,” the annihilation of a lifetime of memories in which (for me and for most people) the bad and worse far exceed the good and better.Thus I face the end with stoicism and equanimity.”

    I guess your pronouncement on what death is must be proof that you’ve been there and done that. So, you’re just like the Messiah. Hallelujah! Hey everybody. SMK knows what death and the “soul” are! Just like he knows there is no God. Aren’t we blessed to have someone so wise and knowledgeable to guide us?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Arthur Jensen's generation of race hereditarians (Eysenck, Rushton, Shockley and perhaps even Charles Murray et al) were quite different in posture from many of their current young followers. Jensen, like most of his friends, apparently wished to be proved wrong about his genetic hypothesis of racial differences in IQ because he genuinely hoped that what...
  • @CanSpeccy
    Nicholas Kristof in the New York Times wrote:

    The average American in the year 1900 had an I.Q. that by today’s standards would measure about 67. Since the traditional definition of mental retardation was an I.Q. of less than 70, that leads to the remarkable conclusion that a majority of Americans a century ago would count today as intellectually disabled.
     
    Since the average American 117 years ago was probably at least as well off and as well educated as today's average Nigerian, what's the fuss about?

    One has to assume that if Nigerians become rich and well educated their IQ's will come to match those of Americans today, and that in the meantime, the minority of Nigerians who receive a good education or who devote much time to acquiring intellectual skills such as those required in playing chess or Scrabble, will perform pretty much as the better educated Americans, as the evidence seems to show.

    “The average American in the year 1900 had an I.Q. that by today’s standards would measure about 67.”

    And what IQ test did they determine that with? None? I hate to point out the obvious, but projecting IQ back over 100 years could only be accepted as “evidence” if you could not differentiate between reality and fiction or were a liar with an agenda to promote. Of course, if Nicholas Kristof of the NYT wrote about it, it MUST be true! Dream on, those of you that want to find ANY exception to the rule and use it as “proof” of an entire population.

    Read More
    • Replies: @res
    Has anyone ever taken one of the first IQ tests and given it to a modern population? That seems like a very direct and effective way of checking some of the more outlandish Flynn Effect claims.

    Some possible tests to use:
    http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_vault/2013/09/24/army_literacy_test_used_on_recruits_in_wwi.html
    http://www.assessmentpsychology.com/iqtest.htm
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_Alpha#History
    http://childpsych.umwblogs.org/intelligence-testing-2/binet-simon-scale/
    Or the first edition of the Stanford-Binet from 1916: http://childpsych.umwblogs.org/intelligence-testing-2/stanford-binet-scale/

    Where would a broad group of the current population score using the early 20th century norms for those tests?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Recently, a columnist-friend, Matt Kenney, sent me a 25-year-old newspaper with his chiding that my column had been given better play. Both had run in The Orange County Register on June 30, 1991. "Is there no room for new nations in the New World Order?" was my title, and the column began: "In turning a...
  • @Ivan K.
    Patrick Buchanan wrote: Croatia and Slovenia are today free ..... nationalism tore apart Yugoslavia

    Carroll Quigley (1965) wrote: “The first beginnings of Balkan nationalism must not be overemphasized. While the inhabitants of the area have always been unfriendly to outsiders and resentful of burdensome governments, these sentiments deserve to be regarded as provincialism or localism rather than nationalism. Such feelings are prevalent among all primitive peoples and must not be regarded as nationalism unless they are so wide as to embrace loyalty to all peoples of the same language and culture and are organized in such fashion that this loyalty is directed toward the state as the core of nationalist strivings.

    The breakup of Yugoslavia was followed by establishment of strongly independent states banana republics, and loyalty to all peoples of the same language and culture surge of unchecked corruption, clannishness and gangsterism.
    Instead of return of Croatian and Serbian immigrants to their liberated homelands, Croatia and Serbia produced new waves of mass emigration.
    Instead of defending every bit of their newly gained freedom & independence, Slovenia and Croatia joined EU, by which they lost much of the independence they gained in 1991.

    Tribalism leads to secession. To what a given case secession itself leads to is always uncertain.

    Online commenter Helmut_Schmidt69 calls us to go back to the first United Nations Conference, the Monetary and Financial Conference, that took place in 1944. The proposed mechanisms for international relations were UN control of exchange rates (i.e. a gold standard, with the UN setting the standard) and “decentralized autonomous regions (i.e. the "ethnostate") that would be unable to field the industrial and manpower necessary to challenge the global regime.”

    I have no problem with Catalonia and Scotland being independent, if they can be so genuinely.

    “I have no problem with Catalonia and Scotland being independent, if they can be so genuinely.”

    Catalonia and Scotland will just trade belonging in Spain or the United Kingdom with belonging to the EU empire. I think this is the way we should work it in America as well. If California will secede, other blue states might be emboldened to join them and they could become the Confederate States of America. Hmm, that name sounds familiar. Whatever. Anyway, this is a way around a civil war. Blue States despise Red States and Red States have contempt for Blue States. Why not allow them freedom from the idiots they hate? There are fundamental philosophical differences in what each one expects of government. Let the 83% of the land mass of the US, known as fly-over country by the Northeast and West Coast, live in their own decentralized fashion. Let the Blue States, that are driven by the urban “oases” full of diversity, live in their paradises of high population density.

    Of course, this is too rational to ever occur. Dissolving the Federal Government would possible lead to the repudiating of the Federal Debt, since the 14th Amendment ties all inhabitants of this country to eventually paying it off. Since that is impossible now, those that lent the imaginary money to real people will never give up their pound of flesh. Its not that Blue and Red States wouldn’t mind telling each other goodbye and fuck off. Its just that their leaders are all bought and paid for and no one would advise them in any way that did not benefit the (((bankers))). Americans have been dumbed down so much that they will expect someone to think for them and tell them what to do. There are plenty of people that will do just that for 40 pieces of silver.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Lawrence Fitton
    the primal need to compete for resources bands people together; along with the natural instinct to judge those of difference simply to determine if they pose a threat to survival.

    So, are you saying negroes are a threat to survival? Cause I sure consider them one.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Tiny Duck
    Leonard Pitts is a Pulitzer prize winning father of six

    What about his writings do you find objectionable? Name one

    Im waiting....

    Yeah, and the gay mulatto was given a Nobel Peace Prize, since he couldn’t earn any on his own. If you don’t know the difference between affirmative action awards and earning an award, well, you obviously don’t! I read a few Pitts columns a few decades ago in the Dallas Morning News, since he was the token black on the editorial page. Didn’t take long to see he was just another whining negro that could only write about how da man be keepin’ da bruthas down. Let’s look at some of his more recent columns. Oh, by the way, this is from Arcamax with the title “From the Left” above the token’s picture.

    “Nothing to see here, say climate deniers” – In addition to his Pulitzer Prize, Pitts is also a world renowned authority on climate models and the elements that produce climate. NOT! Pitts is just another liberal asswipe that worships at the altar of the First Church of Climatology. Calling someone a “climate denier” (by the way, who in world denies climate) is the equivalent of using the word “racist”. It is just an attempt to denigrate anyone that disagrees with you. Here’s a news flash: the majority of White people don’t care about being called racist anymore, now that the left has used it obsessively for decades.

    “America, a land of liberty and justice for some” – Before I read this, I’m going to go out on a limb here and declare that this editorial is about some negro that dindu nuffin and was lynched by institutionalized White racism. Lawd, have mercy! Iz mus’ be a prophet. Has a negro “journalist”, aside from Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams, ever written anything that doesn’t contain these clichés?

    “Charlottesville didn’t spring from nowhere” – Here we have a Pulitzer Prize journalist using a double negative. Of course, double negatives are juz Whites folks imposing day control over da blak man. Ebonics anyone? Let me do my Karnak the Magnificent routine and declare this is about inherent racism due to White privilege. Hey, two for two! You recognize this from the very first sentences, “It is important to look beyond the riot. Yes, last week’s violent demonstration by white supremacists in Charlottesville, Virginia, culminating in the death of 32-year-old Heather Heyer, made for a carnival of obscenity as sickening as it was riveting. But the thing is, it did not spring from nowhere.” This absolves this “brilliant” token from looking into where the mayor and police of Charlottesvile came from in initiating this false flag operation.

    “Sadly, America is not better than this” – I know I’m tempting fate, but I’m going to predict that this column is about “racism”. What do you know! Right again! Can negroes produce any type of literature that doesn’t hinge on excuses for their race’s millennia of failure? Even failures before the White man sucked all dey knowledge from dey brains?

    No, Pitts is a stereotype. He serves the same function as black actors being substituted for White historical figures. Cuz blak chilluns needs dem role models. By the way, are you a negro, Tiny, or just a liberal trying to interpret the world from your mother’s basement?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Tiny Duck
    People of Color are the future

    Your daughters will bear Children of Color

    the borders will be open

    Islam will be the religion of the future

    Read Leonard Pitts

    Tiny Dick is back! Leonard Pitts is just a negro with a perpetual chip on his soldier, moaning about the White devil and trying to scam the system. If you consider him insightful or intelligent, you are either a negro or stupid. Or both. Wait. That’s redundant.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tiny Duck
    Leonard Pitts is a Pulitzer prize winning father of six

    What about his writings do you find objectionable? Name one

    Im waiting....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Since the War if Northern Aggression invaded the South to prevent their cash cow from leaving the US, Amerika has resisted supporting secession anywhere. It did not oppose the breakup of the USSR, which was a type of ethnic secession, but only to become the unopposed dominant power in the world. This was something the (((elite))) needed to enforce their dominion over the majority of the world. Secession is, as Buchanan pointed out, the driving force behind the creation of this country and it is outlined quite well in the Declaration of Independence.

    “When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident…….That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

    The South believed that the contract they entered into with the North (The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution) was voluntary and, therefore, they could voluntarily leave. As many have tried to point out, the Constitution is not a suicide pact. And since the Civil War, the North has hidden behind the self-righteous facade of pretending they fought the South to “free the slaves”. Everyone with any knowledge of history and an IQ above room temperature sees this for the lie it is. The North and Lincoln could have cared less about black slaves. You can argue that slavery is wrong and therefore the results of the invasion of the South are justified. If the North really felt so strongly about slavery, all they had to do was pay the South for their loss of property, which is what slaves were.

    The question was and remains, do groups of people have the right to determine their own destiny or are we merely cattle that serve (((evil men)))? Somehow, the self-righteous cause of “saving the Union” has taken precedent over the rights of men to separate from what they perceive as a rigged game that does not benefit them at all. A non-existent corporate entity has become more important than actual citizens. And for those of you that think this is all well and good, ask yourself if the government we have now is something the Founders would have wanted or that Northern patsies would have died for if they could see what this nation has become.

    I support the right of all peoples to live under the government of their own choice. May both Kurdistan and California succeed at seceding. Centralization of power over a large and multi-ethnic empire is always doomed to fail. The way to prevent this is to remain relatively local and only have one ethnicity as your citizens. Biology trumps ideology and people have always preferred to associate with their own kind.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lawrence Fitton
    the primal need to compete for resources bands people together; along with the natural instinct to judge those of difference simply to determine if they pose a threat to survival.
    , @Joe Levantine
    Great post.
    "A non-existent corporate entity has become more important than actual citizens"
    See Jordan Maxwell's ' the United States is a corporation."
    The late Jim Marrs disclosed on Renseradio.com that when Linclon's aides asked him why he would not let the Southern states secede, his answer was " and who is going to pay the export taxes" meaning the big agricultural exports of the agrarian south. So they claimed that the war was about freeing slaves, an equivalent to Iraq's " weapons of mass destruction."
    The only refuge for a true democracy is a highly decentralized state where people can decide what is good for them and their identity without the oppression of a centre that escapes all forms of voters' accountability the way of the U S Federal Government. Add to this form of governance a total rebuke of imperialistic pursuits and the world will be a better place.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I used to command soldiers. Over the years, lots of them actually. In Iraq, Colorado, Afghanistan, and Kansas. And I’m still fixated on a few of them like this one private first class (PFC) in Kandahar, Afghanistan, in 2011. All of 18, he was short, scrawny, and popular. Nine months after graduating from high school,...
  • The only use for the military, aside from actually protecting this country (not that that it has been used for that since the South defended itself) is to provide training in strategy, tactics, discipline, weaponry, and killing for those that can help overthrow the parasitic government of this nation. I would like to ask the author of this piece what I consider a pertinent question: When the demons that control this country decide to use the military to kill White citizens, how many of your brothers-in-arms will stand with the government and how many will stand with the posterity? The military and the police are the weapons the parasites will use to hold on to their illegitimate power. Otherwise, the posterity would have no problem rooting the scum out. If the American military is as patriotic to We the People as the Soviet military was to the Russian citizenry, they will stand down. We can only hope our soldiers are as honorable as the Soviets. Where do you stand on this, Major Sjursen?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    I hate to say it, but I think the Civil War already answered your question. Ours is a country without any strong, cohesive national identity.
    , @NoseytheDuke
    This is THE question and I commend you for positing it.

    Morgan's Law dictates that there are two reasons for everything - a good reason and the real reason. It is highly likely that this is the real reason for wanting foreigners to serve in the military as a means to obtaining US citizenship.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Hurricane Harvey has been an incredible disaster, and we should keep the poor and beleaguered citizens of east Texas and southwestern Louisiana in our constant prayers and do what we can to assist them. This is a moment of need that will probably continue for months. About this immense and unprecedented natural disaster, I found...
  • And you are an ignorant POS. This is what you said, tiny dingus:

    “Hence, the real hierarchy of brains/talent/looks/character is :

    Successful whites
    Asians (East and South)
    Hispanics
    Blacks
    WNs”

    So, WN’s aren’t White? Show us some pictures of White Nationalists, why don’t you. And if you can’t, shut up. You are a troll. And if you really understood variance, you wouldn’t make such an ignorant statement as “Remember, the white race has to be divided into two”. The White race is a continuum, not just a dichotomy, fecal brains.

    This is what I asked you originally, which you avoided like the plaque:

    “Thomm, can you point to a White country that has allowed non-Whites in it that is better off for that mistake? And “diversity” is not an honest response, nor is “Everybody knows this is true!”. What have they brought to the table? Are there some races that are net negatives in maintaining the country they have been allowed to migrate to? And also, if the US collapses and forms different ethnic enclaves which then choose to allow citizenship only to Whites, will that be bad as well?”

    If you have no intention of answering this, go back to your mother’s basement.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thomm
    False. What I said is true, and you know it. That is why you are so butthurt and blueballed.

    I know the WN, and his vast limitations, all too well.

    Heh heh heh heh

    Sure, sure. You know the WN. On the internet. Saying that blacks are better looking than Whites is as untrue as you can get. Look up some pictures of negroes. NOT mulattoes. Not quadroons. Not octaroons. Etc. Then look up some pictures of some of the people you know are White Nationalists. You would have to be an idiot to make such a statement. Or a liar. Or both. And character? Yeah, blacks are really known for that as a race, aren’t they? I’m sure you could find one negro (not a mulatto, etc.) more intelligent than a White Nationalist, but the odds are against it as a group. Please stop making a fool of yourself. Or don’t.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    Saying that blacks are better looking than Whites is as untrue as you can get.
     
    I didn't say that at all.

    I just say that white variance is so high, that WNs have zero in common with successful whites. WNs represent wastebaskets that genetic matter is purged from. This is why white women rightfully want nothing to do with loser WN males.

    I realize you don't understand concepts like variance, etc., so you can't figure out why successful whites want nothing to do with you.

    You have no business taking credit for what successful whites do. You are just a wigger (a WN with a negro IQ).

    Remember, the white race has to be divided into two, so the hierarchy of brains/looks/talent/character is :

    Successful whites
    Asians
    Hispanics
    Blacks
    WNs

    I bet you still don't understand the concept of variance. Successful white are on the very top. WNs are on the very bottom. That is why successful whites don't let you into respectable society.

    Heh heh heh heh
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thomm
    I have been over this many times over here, so you will have to dig up my prior comments.

    In summary :

    1) White variance is extremely high. A WN loser has no more in common with a talented, successful white than a chihuahua has with a German Shepherd.

    Median white success tells us nothing. The two groups have to be split out. Hence, the real hierarchy of brains/talent/looks/character is :

    Successful whites
    Asians (East and South)
    Hispanics
    Blacks
    WNs

    2) Untalented people tend to be socialists and devise various rationalizations for why the property of talented people should be redistributed towards them. WNs are no different, because they want intra-white socialism.

    They are two orders of magnitude worse than white women.
     
    If you are *that* delusional, you deserve what you are getting. Thanks for reminding us that WN is a goddess cult.

    Libertarianism (or equivalent small-govt ideology) is the most fair and most just. WNs fare poorly under meritocracy, so they oppose it.

    Speaking of delusional, your putting blacks above White Nationalists in brains, looks, and character shows us three things. You don’t know any White Nationalists, you watch too much TV, and you are too young to have any wisdom.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm
    False. What I said is true, and you know it. That is why you are so butthurt and blueballed.

    I know the WN, and his vast limitations, all too well.

    Heh heh heh heh

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thomm
    SJWs are the dregs of humanity. White Nationalists (who are also leftists, albeit of a slightly different sort) are just as bad.

    Can you explain to us why “White Nationalism” is wrong? I think you are confusing White Nationalism with White Supremacism. Not that White Supremacism is wrong, since everyone already believes in it anyway. Whites because they realize that Whites have provided the majority of science and technology that has eliminated disease, provided food for the world, and made life more pleasant. Others because they realize they can’t live at a first world standard without Whites, with the possible exception of northeastern Orientals. I like something that the Oregon Muse posted on Ace of Spades.

    “Progressives think that America is the worst nation in the world, full of violence, racism, sexism, homophobia and Islamophobia and ruled by Literally Hitler in an orange fright wig. So why don’t they post warning signs on the border of this evil country and try to keep people out instead of inviting them all in?”

    Another of his cogent points stated:

    “What I want to know is, since when did American citizenship become a human right?”

    But, according to you, if we prevent those we don’t want to be here from becoming citizens we are White Nationalists, which, in your opinion, is beyond the pale of human behavior. Seems more like commonsense to me.

    Thomm, can you point to a White country that has allowed non-Whites in it that is better off for that mistake? And “diversity” is not an honest response, nor is “Everybody knows this is true!”. What have they brought to the table? Are there some races that are net negatives in maintaining the country they have been allowed to migrate to? And also, if the US collapses and forms different ethnic enclaves which then choose to allow citizenship only to Whites, will that be bad as well?

    Read More
    • Agree: SMK
    • Replies: @Clark Westwood

    Thomm, can you point to a White country that has allowed non-Whites in it that is better off for that mistake? And “diversity” is not an honest response, nor is “Everybody knows this is true!”. What have they brought to the table? Are there some races that are net negatives in maintaining the country they have been allowed to migrate to?
     
    I like this thought experiment as another way of getting at the same idea (I forget where I first came across this):

    Imagine you belong to the middle class (or whatever corresponds to the middle class) of some third-world country circa 1880. It doesn't matter what country -- it can be somewhere in Southeast Asia, South America, Africa, the South Pacific, wherever. Also imagine that you don't work for the existing government or depend on it in any direct way for your livelihood. Now imagine that you can choose any country in the world (including the country that we're imagining you live in) to "run" your country. Which one would you choose?

    The more I study history, the more certain I've become that I would want England to run my country. I think the Brits would do a better job than any other candidate.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • If you get your news from NBC, this is what you learned about yesterday’s Unite the Right rally: “Charlottesville White Nationalist Rally Violence Prompts State of Emergency.” That’s right: The problem was white nationalist violence. It was as if the demonstrators had behaved just like Black Lives Matter or masked antifa: looting, burning, stopping traffic,...
  • @Anonymous
    Also, aligning yourself with Nazis, neo-Nazis, and the KKK legitimates criticism of you in the eyes of probably at least 99% of the U.S. population. The adoption of such a strategy will lead almost certainly to an organization's destruction, not its growth.

    “Also, aligning yourself with Nazis, neo-Nazis, and the KKK legitimates criticism of you in the eyes of probably at least 99% of the U.S. population.”

    I doubt it is anywhere near 99%. You should have used majority instead. Not that there is really anything wrong with people choosing to be Nazis, neo-Nazis, or the KKK. Hey, if someone performs Female Genital Mutilation as a matter of religion and a certain percentage of America accepts this, how can being a Nazi or Klansmen be anymore ridiculous? Its a chose, isn’t it? Some people are Mormons or Jehovah’s Witnesses and they have some foolish beliefs as well. The Demonic Rats align with anti-fa, BLM, Muslims, illegal immigrants, and the LGBTUVWTF minorities. Does that legitimize criticism of them? For some people, yes. For the Demonic Rats, not in the least.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SMK
    The problem with your argument is that the left controls almost everything, the universities, the schools, the media (news, talk shows, TV shows, movies), the perception of reality which is often a distortion and inversion of objective reality, most perniciously and systemically in respect to race and nonwhite immigration. They "spin" the memes and control the narrative and hold the megaphone. They choose what is news and what is not news. They decide who and what is good and who and what is evil, who is respected, praised, feted, lionized, and who is demonized, vilified, caricatured, ridiculed.

    Ergo, the left-liberal establishment and Democratic party are not vilified and demonized for supporting or refusing to criticize and denounce "antifa" and BLM fanatics and terrorists or lying hatemongers and demagogues like Al Sharpton, while all race-realists and white advocates and immigration restrictionists, intelligent and rational and honest men like Jared Taylor and Peter Brimelow and John Derbyshire, are demonized and vilified as "racists" and "Nazis" and "white supremacists" and conflated with extremists who hold signs with swastikas and wave confederate flags and such at Charlottesville.
    , @SMK
    Because the left controls almost everything, we live in a nation in which Al Sharpton, a lying hatemonger and hoaxer who should have been buried in prison long ago for murder and tax-evasion, was invited to the White House over a 100 times during the Obama years, often to meet with and advise the President as his "go-to-man on race" and had a nightly talk show for 4-years on MSNBC and is described as a "civil rights activist," an appellation with positive, even heroic, connotations. We live in a nation in which BLM extemists -a quasi-terrorist organization that calls for the murder of white police officers ("what do we want, pigs in a blanket"), if not explicitly as a matter of policy then implicitly in their white-hating and police-hating rhetoric- were invited to the WH to meet with Obama and advise him on racial issues.

    And in the collusion with AG Eric Holder, Obama espoused their lies and canards on the shooting deaths, clearly in self-defense, of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, recklessly facilitating if not explicitly provoking riots and the shooting deaths of 5 police and the wounding of 7 others in Dallas by a white-hating black lunatic. And likewise in Louisiana. And for all this he endured only the mildest and most feckless criticism on Fox News and by a few Republicans and mainstream conservatives: no calls for impeachment, not legal actions, civil or criminal, no serious political repercussions.

    Imagine the outrage and hysteria if Trump invited Jared Taylor to the White House, which of course he would never even think of doing. Or even Ann Coulter.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Binyamin
    Ron, the Alt Right are pure evil. They are virtually indistinguishable from Nazis and Ku Klux Klan. The phrases, 'white nationalist', 'white supremacist' and Neo Nazi means the same. People who call themselves white nationalist are too cowardly to admit that they are effectively Neo Nazis. Senator Ted Cruz was right when he called them pure evil yesterday-I cannot quote him exactly but the gist of what he was saying was that when you are faced with evil you have to take a moral stand, and Ted Cruz is no left liberal, believe me. Have you read what Richard Spencer, the Nazi thug and Alt Right poster boy wrote recently? He has called for ethnic cleansing to create a white ethno state in America. Ethnic cleansing equals genocide and it is what ISIS are currently doing in the middle east to the Yazidis, the Christians and the Kurds.
    I think the media has been extremely generous to the Alt Right and has given it undeserved publicity and overlooked its tendency to violence, bigotry and intimidation. The Alt Right is an emerging proto- terrorist movement and most politically related violence and terrorism in the US over the past ten years has been committed by people on the far right rather than by Islamists. The security services knows about it yet the media has chosen to ignore this unpalatable fact. The security services has also known for some time that on-line radicalization of young white males, mainly the 'loser types' is causing a major security headache throughout America.
    Until last week Chancellorsville was a sleepy peaceful town where people just got on with their lives and got on with each other. Yesterday the town was invaded by uninvited Neo Nazis and KKK and the whole world saw on their TV screens the shameful spectacle of Nazi salutes in a small town America in the twenty first century.
    It is an irony Ron, that a significant fraction of the white nationalist crowd are foreign born extremists and hate preachers. I think it is time Homeland security moves in against them and carry out deportations. And finally Ron, you will earn some good Karma if you stop providing a platform to some of these foreign born right wing extremists and hate preachers.

    “Ron, the Alt Right are pure evil.”

    Puh-leeze! Your (((people))) removed the concept of absolute standards from the debate when you took God out of the equation.

    “They are virtually indistinguishable from Nazis and Ku Klux Klan. The phrases, ‘white nationalist’, ‘white supremacist’ and Neo Nazi means the same.”

    They are quite distinguishable. Just because it suits your narrative for them to be the same doesn’t mean some won’t see your deliberate deception for what it is.

    “Have you read what Richard Spencer, the Nazi thug and Alt Right poster boy wrote recently? He has called for ethnic cleansing to create a white ethno state in America.”

    Quote please, so we can make that determination for ourselves. Your opinion is based on quicksand.

    “The Alt Right is an emerging proto- terrorist movement and most politically related violence and terrorism in the US over the past ten years has been committed by people on the far right rather than by Islamists.”

    Oh, god! No data, no facts. Just (((your))) disinformation.

    “Yesterday the town was invaded by uninvited Neo Nazis and KKK and the whole world saw on their TV screens the shameful spectacle of Nazi salutes in a small town America in the twenty first century.”

    They also saw anti-fa, BLM, and police and authoritarian suppression of free speech.

    “It is an irony Ron, that a significant fraction of the white nationalist crowd are foreign born extremists and hate preachers”

    What might that percentage be? When you make such claims, you need to provide a statistical measure. Ooooh….hate preachers. Hate is the worst, isn’t it? Too bad what is “hate” for (((you))) is self-preservation for the host.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The US submarine captain says, “We’ve all got to die one day, some sooner and some later. The trouble always has been that you’re never ready, because you don’t know when it’s coming. Well, now we do know and there’s nothing to be done about it.” He says he will be dead by September. It...
  • I really can’t take the threat of nuclear “war” seriously. Yes, there are well informed people that either promote war or peace, but they are paid to do this. What would happen if a nuclear war occurred? Much of what passes for the wealth of the ((((elite)))) would be destroyed. Admittedly, these are evil people, but would they rather destroy everything out of spite? They would effect themselves as well. Sure, they could live out their pathetic lives in underground bunkers, with a supply of recycled water, food grown under artificial light and animals living in large enclosures. But, who would do the shit work for them? Hmm? I mean, if you’ve destroyed the world and you’re dependent on younger, stronger people to protect you and do your work, what will stop them from commandeering your environment and using your bodies to feed the pigs? Just a thought exercise.

    No, given the fact that an EMP in the upper atmosphere could take out the electrical grid just as effectively as laying waste to their own property, don’t you think that would be a preferred course of action for the ((((parasites))))?

    Read More
    • Replies: @plonialmoni
    As you point out, war is irrational. Those who make war destroy themselves. That never stops people from making war. does it?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Free speech is not doing particularly well on today’s college campuses. The good news is that resistance to the little commissars is mobilizing; the bad news is that this “resistance” consists almost entirely of abstract scholarly essays or grandiloquent soapbox speeches (see here, for example). Indeed, these pontifications have reached industrial scale proportions and scarcely...
  • @Che Guava
    I don't recall the name of the institution, Evergreen or something like that, photos I saw show a couple of black guys and a lot of, mainly fat, white lesbian feminists, sitting around with baseball bats.

    Unlikely coalition indeed.

    Black guys cannot lie. Dey liks big butts!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Yeah,
    They enjoyed the genes of peoples (of their own colour) they were wiping out to gain massive bums. That stupid reality progqamme.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The most remarkable thing about House of Cards, at this point, is that it hasn’t ended yet. The first season was great – the story of an ambitious, scheming, and profoundly immoral political couple, which afforded the audience an inside view of the workings of American politics. By the end of Season 2, it became...
  • House of Cards was originally derived from a British TV show of the same name. In the end, the Underwood character is killed, with participation of his wife in the death. I always assumed that they would end it the same way here. But, now they have the new narrative, in which a female is now the President. It is necessary for the media to promote the feminization of reality, so this is the direction they are going. I’m sure there will be resistance by the Kevin Spacey character due, of course, to his self-entitled White male vision of himself, so Claire may have him killed. But, I don’t think this will be continued through the Trump presidency. I think Kevin Spacey is getting bored and never had any intention of the series continuing as long as it has. We’ll see.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rhett Hardwick
    I recall the British House of Cards from the early 90's, seems to me it was much shorter. Probably goes to show the problem is world wide. I suppose it is, Caesar was killed by his friends.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Here’s a dictum I have read now and again on the internet: “an organization that isn’t explicitly anti-Left will eventually be swallowed up by the Left.” Here’s another I am making up on the fly (although I am sure others have said it many times before): “an organization that isn’t explicitly anti-nonwhite will eventually be...
  • @Priss Factor
    Yeah, all five of them. Japan remains ca.98% racially Asian (fully Japanese).

    I didn't say Japan as of NOW is filled with Negroes.

    I said it may happen in the future.

    Why?

    Because even though there are few blacks in Japan now, Negropholia is a cancer in Japan, and cancer spreads. No matter how small it begins, it spread and spreads and never stops spreading.

    Even in the past, there were some blacks in Japan, mostly due to US military presence and rappers/jazz artists. But back then, Japan regarded them as a mere presence, not some ideal to promote. Things are different now.

    1. Japanese no longer have the kind of pride they did. Most Japanese grew up as only-child. This happened over three generations, and this means many Japanese have no uncles, aunts, cousins, nieces, nephews. The kind of Japanese family culture seen in Ozu films are gone.
    Instead, Japanese kids grew up as single kids identifying with comic books, video games, professional fighters, and etc. So, Japanese grew up as loners, not as members of family instilled with Japanese culture and identity.

    2. Japanese have become more accepting of foreign domination. The most sacred sport of Japan is sumo, but Japanese allowed Mongols to totally take over and break all records. Now, Mongols are East Asians and similar to Japanese, but this should be humiliating, but Japan just accepted it like a bitch. Mongols failed to invade Japan but now they did. But what is interesting is how Japanese didn't take measures to stop importation of Mongols. MORE were brought to whup Japanese even more. It wont' be long before Negroes enter and totally whup all Japanese and hump the ho's.

    3. Anime, manga, video games, and J-pop made Japanese favor fantasy over reality. Also, these are all trans-racial and Japanese are mentally wanna-be-whites. But there is growing rap culture, and Japanese are into black culture. Many Japanese girls try to be gangsta and grow up listening rap. This means many young Japanese feel more globo-Afro than Japanese.

    4. There is a whole subculture where Japanese women seek out black men. A military guy who spent a lot of time in Yokohama told me that many Japanese women are into jungaru fever. And Japanese men are a bunch of cucks. He told me cuck culture is there in Japan too. Japanese men have white men and black men hump their ho's, and cuck pornography is a big thing in Japan. Jus think about it. Japan has few blacks, but their culture is already like this.

    5. Already, children of Japanese women who went with blacks are making big splash in media and sports. Some mulatto was Ms. Japan, and mulatto Japanese win Olympic medals. This makes Japanese see mulatto-ism as a good thing since it wins blings for Japan. Never mind that these mulattoes are products of Japanese women rejecting Japanese men as inferior.

    In the past, there were some mulattoes in Japan, but Japanese treated them like other minorities. Nuisance that had to be tolerated. But now, Japanese are promoting such people as the new ideal.
    Also, as US dominates global discourse, mistreatment of blacks is a far bigger issue than, say, mistreating other minorities. So, Japanese have imbibed 'white guilt' and try to prove that it is a 'good nation' by being pro-black. This will remove stigma from race-mixing, and more Japanese women will go black and have mulatto babies. Blacks, like Jews and homos, must get special consideration since they are protected by globalism as special people. If Japanese mistreat Iranian minorities, who cares? But if some Negro cries 'racism' in Japan, it's in the NY Times.

    6. Japanese men have already lost sexual confidence. By some news accts, 50% of Japanese men have given up on sex and marriage and look forward to buying sex robots. And 80% of Japanese women say they are sexually unsatisfied. Now, combine those factors with globalism, Liberal Japanese media's promotion of diversity-blacks-interracism, and you now have a mechanism in place to expand more interracism with blacks.

    7. Japanese now feel morally defensive about their homogeneity. They don't feel proud of it and apologize when pressed about it. In the past, Japanese were proud about their homogeneity and wrote books about how Japanese are a unique people. Now, such ideas are absent, and Japanese media push interracism and diversity.

    So, when we take into account all these factors, the problem of interracism isn't just a wound. It is now a cancer, and it will accelerate.

    We are told that Shinzo Abe is right-wing and ultra-nationalist, but it's of no use. As Japan is whore nation of the US, it can't do much with its so-called nationalism. What matters is what happens among the people, and they are cucked, infantilized(with kawaii culture), atomized and isolated, and globalized.

    And Japanese women have lost respect in Japanese men who now act and talk like pansies and dorks. And easy travel makes it possible for Japanese women to seeking Negro men. And as it's no longer frowned upon by Japanese society, it will spread and spread. Also, Japanese women are raised to be whores. Their fathers are TV-addicted morons and their mothers are whores themselves into adultery and stuff.

    Japanese power was always collective and traditional. It's a delicate ecology. As individuals, Japanese are vulnerable. Japanese men are small and can be whupped by any man. Also, they are timid and lack personality. IN the past, Japanese men and women were part of a cultural ecology, and they married according to collective rules and customs. But as they've broken down, atomized Japanese men withdraw into video game land, and Japanese women seek out better men or watch TV soap for fantasy.

    It is a cancer.

    “Japanese now feel morally defensive about their homogeneity. They don’t feel proud of it and apologize when pressed about it. In the past, Japanese were proud about their homogeneity and wrote books about how Japanese are a unique people. Now, such ideas are absent, and Japanese media push interracism and diversity.”

    “And Japanese women have lost respect in Japanese men who now act and talk like pansies and dorks. And easy travel makes it possible for Japanese women to seeking Negro men. And as it’s no longer frowned upon by Japanese society, it will spread and spread. Also, Japanese women are raised to be whores. Their fathers are TV-addicted morons and their mothers are whores themselves into adultery and stuff.”

    “As individuals, Japanese are vulnerable. Japanese men are small and can be whupped by any man. Also, they are timid and lack personality. IN the past, Japanese men and women were part of a cultural ecology, and they married according to collective rules and customs. But as they’ve broken down, atomized Japanese men withdraw into video game land, and Japanese women seek out better men or watch TV soap for fantasy.”

    Perhaps you can show us the data that makes this reality and not just the personal opinions of a black willy obsessed troll that got his butt kicked by blacks in school, apparently engaged with blacks in fellatio, and comes to this site to spread gossip, half-truths, distortions and irrational personal opinions. Say, Prissy, have you ever lived in Japan?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Yojimbo/Zatoichi
    He's talking out of his hat. Mostly made up.

    AGAIN. ca.98% of Japan is racially ethnically Japanese. As in BOTH sides of one's family are racially Japanese. Aside from the few US military who are stationed there, its extremely rare for ordinary Japanese to come into daily contact with blacks. Japanese isn't an easy language for whites to learn, much less for blacks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    Like it or not, the Negro Dong has become a viral meme or pop cultural trope in the West.

    These are white sorority girls.

    http://gawker.com/sorority-girl-celebrates-21st-birthday-with-racist-thre-1670470468

    I don't know them, and I didn't tell them to bake the cake. But they came up such stuff because they grew up talking graphically about sex and the negro.

    Here are white girls on the beach.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62SB_4JFLMg

    In the past, it was considered uncouth for girls to talk like this. Today, girls grow up watching porny Miley Cyrus and Beyonce videos. Already, Christina Aguilera is old hat.

    And Negro dong is one of those dominant cultural tropes. YOU can pretend that I'm just making it up. YOU are not paying attention to culture and society.

    This is Sex and City episode.

    https://youtu.be/U9RBnX1vUKc?t=2m57s

    This isn't just some fetish porn but prime time TV show seen by 100s of millions of young girls worldwide. It's gotten so that even Japanese women now seek out black men in Jamaica and Africa and have kids with them as 'new Japanese'.

    Also, the media promote this. Why? Negro is holy, so worshiping Negro prowess is next to godliness. Also, the globalist elites want to destroy white pride and power. So, by demoting white male pride by elevating black manhood, white women are jungle-feverized.

    Along with holy homomania, TV advertising promotes jungle fever in US and EU.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2jNQ9YP-0A

    As Joe Louis said, 'you can run, but you can't hide'.

    If you want to do something about the demise of white race, you need to honestly diagnose the disease and stop pretending it's all just made up.

    I’m not claiming you’re making it up. I’m just pointing out your fixation on black wee wees. Are you aware of it? Everytime there is a thread on black lack of intelligence, you promote what you admitted is a meme. And then you list a few anecdotal sites primarily by and for women. You want to talk about black willies? Why don’t you talk about the herd mentality of women and the misery loves company recruiting that accompanies females that do something they regret? You also add the myth that blacks are more muscular and destroy white pride by kicking white butt. And yet Whites are always the strongest weight lifters. And apparently you viewing blacks in an urban environment is your evidence that blacks kick White butt. Like in MMA? Maybe you meant to say they have a larger percentage of muscle mass? This is a ratio concerning body fat. Whites have more body fat, hence they are more buoyant. You know about how “Black Men Can’t Swim”? You also shill that blacks have bigger voices and this makes Whites respect blacks as ‘masterful’. Oh, you mean that blacks are louder and noisier than Whites? Are you White? Do you respect blacks as “masterful”?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    Please don't expect a reply from Prissy Boy as you are exhorting him to man up and quit bitching about black ding dong.
    , @Priss Factor
    You also shill that blacks have bigger voices and this makes Whites respect blacks as ‘masterful’. Oh, you mean that blacks are louder and noisier than Whites? Are you White? Do you respect blacks as “masterful”?

    It doesn’t matter what I think. I have zero power in the world. What matters is global perception.

    This Jungalo-Cuck video got 500 million views. Today, ideology and creeds are irrelevant in the culture war that is about sensationalization of animalism.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ekZEVeXwek

    White girls and all girls worldwide are growing up to images and sounds like that. That is presented as ‘innocent’ entertainment(as there are much raunchier stuff). At the Ariana concert in UK there were many little girls.

    Rightists bitch about Muslims, Sharia, and that nonsense, but for every person in the west who reads the Koran, a 10,000 listen to rap and music like song above. This is why even Japanese women are seeking out black men and having kids with them and raising them to beat Japanese in Japan. And PC forces in Japan are elevating mulattoes like royalty. Globalism is a worldwide tsunami that spreads Afromania all over.

    But because of hurt white male pride and because honest discussion about blacks is deemed ‘racist by PC, even rightists would rather bitch about sharia and Muslims instead. Rightists who pretend that Muslims are the main threat are really just alt-cucks. They attack Muslims for blowing up Ariana Grande concert(as 'western liberty') when what her ilk is promoting has more dire consequences for the white race.

    Pop Culture is THE culture in the West. It is more powerful than any religion, ideology, political party, etc. Indeed, the rise of homomania owes to the pop-culturalization of society where moral values are now about appeasing celebrities. Video games pop music, and blockbuster movies are even at the center of serious discourse among elites and academics. Mothers and daughters read the same 50 shades of grey novels.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ypg71Aixwc

    Now, what is the MAIN theme of Pop Culture? Other than homomania, is it not Jungle Fever and ACOWW? Who can deny this?

    So, while so many people discuss ‘serous’ ideas, the future is really being determined by the power of idols and sensations, by the siren calls of pop culture. Apollo has lost out to Dionysus and Aphrodite is now Afrodite into having mulatto babies.

    Just do the math. Millions upon millions of Africans are coming to Europe. EU culture is now pop culture. Furthermore, interracism, esp between black male and white female, is promoted by both pop culture and PC. Hollywood even plans to make next Bond 007.

    It’s not about what I think. I can agree with you 100%, and it won’t make the slightest difference.
    The fact is globalism worships the magic negro and mandingo. That crazy novel is now becoming the unspoken ideology of the West via pop culture. It says “white girl liberation means running to Negro, and white makes better accept and even praise this or else be called ‘racist’.” Even though kids are made to read TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD, the pop culture that they really obsess over is about MANDINGO. PC professes Mockingbird, Pop Culture promotes Mandingo. (Mandingo is the novel that should really be included in the curriculum.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandingo_(novel)

    So, what is the bigger threat to UK? Muslims and odd cases of terrorism OR massive Afro-colonization of white wombs via idolatry and mass immivasion?

    Just think. Even if I agree with you 100%, would it make any difference to current dire trends?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Priss Factor
    Also, perhaps I could shame the NR editors into showing at least a little self-respect during their long, sad goodbye. Guys, even for cucks, this is cucking.

    Good article, but it too cucks by pretending that the main problem is about IQ.

    Seriously, if blacks had lower IQ but had the physique of Emmanuel Lewis, would it matter?

    No, the real threat to whites is muscular, vocal, and genital.

    Blacks are more muscular and destroy white pride by kicking white butt.
    Blacks got bigger voices and this makes whites respect blacks as 'masterful'.
    Blacks got bigger dongs, and jungle fever further humiliates white men cuz of ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of white wombs.

    Those are the real reasons why whites need safe spaces from blacks.

    Men need pride of manhood for mental health, and white male pride is impossible around blacks due to BAMMAMA factor: blacks are more muscular and more aggressive.

    You really have a fixation on black penises. Have you experienced them personally or just on porn sites?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Like it or not, the Negro Dong has become a viral meme or pop cultural trope in the West.

    These are white sorority girls.

    http://gawker.com/sorority-girl-celebrates-21st-birthday-with-racist-thre-1670470468

    I don't know them, and I didn't tell them to bake the cake. But they came up such stuff because they grew up talking graphically about sex and the negro.

    Here are white girls on the beach.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62SB_4JFLMg

    In the past, it was considered uncouth for girls to talk like this. Today, girls grow up watching porny Miley Cyrus and Beyonce videos. Already, Christina Aguilera is old hat.

    And Negro dong is one of those dominant cultural tropes. YOU can pretend that I'm just making it up. YOU are not paying attention to culture and society.

    This is Sex and City episode.

    https://youtu.be/U9RBnX1vUKc?t=2m57s

    This isn't just some fetish porn but prime time TV show seen by 100s of millions of young girls worldwide. It's gotten so that even Japanese women now seek out black men in Jamaica and Africa and have kids with them as 'new Japanese'.

    Also, the media promote this. Why? Negro is holy, so worshiping Negro prowess is next to godliness. Also, the globalist elites want to destroy white pride and power. So, by demoting white male pride by elevating black manhood, white women are jungle-feverized.

    Along with holy homomania, TV advertising promotes jungle fever in US and EU.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2jNQ9YP-0A

    As Joe Louis said, 'you can run, but you can't hide'.

    If you want to do something about the demise of white race, you need to honestly diagnose the disease and stop pretending it's all just made up.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The word revisionist derives from roots meaning "to look again." And since history is an ongoing project, whose main purpose is to help us understand where we have come from and where we are going, we obviously need to keep taking fresh looks at the past as we propose new visions of the future. Obligatory...
  • @Che Guava
    Sorry, your meandering, meaningless reply does nothing to support your assertions.

    OK baby, just when were the two times a Chinese navy attempted to conquer Japan?

    Your kind of knowledge-free posts, we may do without.

    The Mongol attempt does not count.

    Try not to lie about things of which you know nothing, many posters know much.

    What a mindless douche. If you need to split hairs to make yourself feel intelligent, fine, be an asshole.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    That is no reply, ergo, your original statement was stupid and founded on nothing.

    Resort to meaningless insults, GTFO.

    Alright, you are a fool, but I ask again, when were the two attempts by a Chinese 'navy' to invading Japan?

    Come on, genius boy, you must knowing something nobody else in history does, so, I beg you, please to enlightening those of us who actually read history, from a critical perspective, with your vastly superior knowledge.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I have always assumed that the Ancients were wiser than us, but I admit that my evaluation is subject to survivor bias: the best of their thinking has been passed on to us, the mediocre rest forgotten. The Ancients were not all at the level of Socrates, they also included the dullards that killed him....
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    I have long expected the ancients to have been duller than us.

    The key issue is that progress gets harder over time, concepts build on each other, you need to tie more and more things together in increasingly complex ways. So the threshold for discovery keeps going up and up, as does the threshold for understanding those discoveries.

    Any of the ancient Greek philosophers can be fully understood by a committed 110-115 IQ college student. I would not say the same of Heidegger or Wittgenstein.

    Ergo for math, the sciences, and pretty much all other spheres of human accomplishment.

    “Any of the ancient Greek philosophers can be fully understood by a committed 110-115 IQ college student. I would not say the same of Heidegger or Wittgenstein.”

    Yeah, but Heidegger and Wittgenstein were Krauts (German, Austrian). When reading German Philosophers you come to the conclusion that they ranked each other by how much their books weighed. Talk about soporific! Just open any book by a “German” Philosopher. You will be sawing logs very shortly.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The word revisionist derives from roots meaning "to look again." And since history is an ongoing project, whose main purpose is to help us understand where we have come from and where we are going, we obviously need to keep taking fresh looks at the past as we propose new visions of the future. Obligatory...
  • @Che Guava
    Even in the voyages of Zheng He (or Hwang Ho, in transliteration from Cantonese), there were many cases of punitive expeditions when the natives were not seen as sufficiently cooperative. What is now Sri Lanka had a particularly good and relatively well-recorded example, but there were several similar incidents from S.E. Asia to E. Africa.

    It is interesting that the adventure came to such a sharp and sudden end. The reason given, if we have too much to do with the barbarians, we ourselves will be barbarized.

    attempted to use their navy to conquer japan twice
     
    When?

    A fifth of the sixth-century nobility here were of Chinese descent (most were from the Korean peninsula, another fifth seen as native), but China cannot be said to have had a navy at the time.

    Mongol invasion, sure, but again, the boats they used were not a navy, and it was a Mongol, not a Chinese, action.

    1894 to 1895? Not an attempt at conquest, and China's navy was not unitary at the time, also much corruption. It was about Korea to start, further Japanese ambitions as it progressed.

    So when were the two times you claim?

    “Mongol invasion, sure, but again, the boats they used were not a navy, and it was a Mongol, not a Chinese, action.”

    But, Kublai Khan had subdued all of China in 1271 and begun the Yuan dynasty of China. So, as emperor of China and because Mongolia did not have a fleet, how was this not a Chinese action? Especially since these ships were built in China and Korea. Let’s also not forget that the Qing dynasty was also not ruled by Chinese but by Manchurians. The “chinese” people have never really gone to war. Whoever was their ruler determined who they would go to war with and when. You can quibble about whether to say “navy” or “a whole bunch of ships directed toward a common goal”, but that is just semantics.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Sorry, your meandering, meaningless reply does nothing to support your assertions.

    OK baby, just when were the two times a Chinese navy attempted to conquer Japan?

    Your kind of knowledge-free posts, we may do without.

    The Mongol attempt does not count.

    Try not to lie about things of which you know nothing, many posters know much.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Of course the Chinese had built bigger and better ships centuries earlier, but being civilized people rather than ultra-bellicose barbarians, they used those ships for trade and exploration, not conquest.”

    I find the author’s statements to be simplistic utterances. Anyone that doubts the bellicosity of the Chinese only has to study Chinese history. They conquered Korea, and had external wars with the Mongols, Eastern and Western Turks, the Japanese, Vietnamese, and the Burmese, among others. But, they were absolutely ruthless against other Chinese. From the Battle of Banquan in the 26th century BC to today’s interference in Tibet, the Chinese have fought a larger number of wars than any European power. And they didn’t use ships for conquest probably because they didn’t have cannon. Even so, they attempted to use their Navy to conquer Japan twice. Chinese ships were larger than European vessels at the time of Zheng He in the 1400′s, but by the end of the 15th century and early 16th, European ships were faster, more maneuverable, with better sails designed for ocean going voyages. Chinese ships had a flatter hull, better in shallow water, although there were some additions that made deep water sailing easier. One has to wonder about their exploratory nature as they never really attempted to tackle the Pacific Ocean. They never attempted a really long stretch of ocean sailing, comparable to the European powers that traversed the Atlantic and Pacific in the 15th and 16th centuries.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Even in the voyages of Zheng He (or Hwang Ho, in transliteration from Cantonese), there were many cases of punitive expeditions when the natives were not seen as sufficiently cooperative. What is now Sri Lanka had a particularly good and relatively well-recorded example, but there were several similar incidents from S.E. Asia to E. Africa.

    It is interesting that the adventure came to such a sharp and sudden end. The reason given, if we have too much to do with the barbarians, we ourselves will be barbarized.

    attempted to use their navy to conquer japan twice
     
    When?

    A fifth of the sixth-century nobility here were of Chinese descent (most were from the Korean peninsula, another fifth seen as native), but China cannot be said to have had a navy at the time.

    Mongol invasion, sure, but again, the boats they used were not a navy, and it was a Mongol, not a Chinese, action.

    1894 to 1895? Not an attempt at conquest, and China's navy was not unitary at the time, also much corruption. It was about Korea to start, further Japanese ambitions as it progressed.

    So when were the two times you claim?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Pretty much everything our media tells us about China is wrong–or at least one-sided–including its tales of a China ‘debt problem’. The Chinese are, in all times and places, debt-averse and China’s government which, unlike ours, must take long-term responsibility for the economy, is no different. Mao set the example and grew GDP by 6.2...
  • @MBlanc46
    I'm an early Boomer, and I certainly don't have an "entitlement attitude". Nor does my slightly younger wife. Nor do my friends, who are mostly of the same generation. None of us doubted that we'd have to work our tails off for everything we got, and that's just what we did. Perhaps you should expend some effort learning about the way the world actually works instead of spouting the first piece of BS that comes into your empty head.

    Where in my post did I hyperbolically state that all Baby Boomers have these traits. I am a Baby Boomer myself. I have no delusions about our generation. There are many Boomers that are red-pilled, and many that vote DemonicRat. I do know that our generation, when compared with early generations, was essentially raised in the lap of luxury and many never learned the first thing about personal responsibility. And I noticed that you feel you have the need to complain about an imagined slight that a real adult would have never have reacted to. Sort of like a spoiled Baby Boomer. Thanks for providing the authentic example.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    You know no such thing about Boomers vs. other generations and personal responsibility; you just like to run your mouth about that of which you are ignorant. I will admit that smart-mouthed punks such as you elicit more of a response than perhaps they should. Hence, 30.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The United States and Europe used to be the economic powerhouses of the world. What happened? They turned their currency creation over to private banks and began borrowing their own money at interest. What else happened? The people of the West became spoiled. As evinced by the Baby Boomer generation, they developed an entitlement attitude in which they did not recognize that economic policy has economic consequences. The standard belief of your average lemming is that now that finance has corrected all of the problems associated with boom and bust cycles, we no longer have to fear severe economic disasters. They will only be slight hiccups which will be cured in short shrift. The people of Modern China have never experienced the type of prosperity they have now. I think it will be interesting to watch what happens when they become as spoiled as the West and expect their economy to always be stable and to constantly grow richer. But, we may not have the time to watch for this. The world economy is on a precipice now. We will all be effected by the outcome. Scary, but interesting times.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh

    The people of Modern China have never experienced the type of prosperity they have now. I think it will be interesting to watch what happens when they become as spoiled as the West and expect their economy to always be stable and to constantly grow richer.
     
    I highly suspect that your unstated thought will be true - they will become just as social justicey and entitled, and ultimately bring the exact same social pathologies which are already rising. In fact, I think this is probably the single greatest dismay in Japan to use another example - its not that the lives of the average Japanese is unpleasant at all, but there's a lot of frustration at the sense that life isn't getting betterand we aren't getting richer like our fathers were.

    When the set expectation that things will always get better, wealthier, freer, faster, etc, then even holding steady feels like a defeat. And then they engage in peculiar behavior in an effect to get the same high as they were before.

    I'm sure Godfree will disagree, in part because he believes that the centralized management of China will successfully do something different, and that the technocrats will pull off something amazing. Maybe. China is different from Japan and South Korea, more dynamic and competitive, often vicious and certainly willing to gamble on ideas, including terrible ones.

    But for myself I'm less optimistic about the state of humanity as a whole. I don't think any of us will escape the atomization trap.
    , @MBlanc46
    I'm an early Boomer, and I certainly don't have an "entitlement attitude". Nor does my slightly younger wife. Nor do my friends, who are mostly of the same generation. None of us doubted that we'd have to work our tails off for everything we got, and that's just what we did. Perhaps you should expend some effort learning about the way the world actually works instead of spouting the first piece of BS that comes into your empty head.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Although the Bard warned against finding the mind’s construction in the face, we are apt to try. Can facial features show us the power of the brain behind the mask? Lee et al. (2017) think so. Unlike minor Scottish nobility planning regicide, they have made their judgments using the medium of facial photographs of twins...
  • @Steve Sailer
    I've always wanted to see a scientific study of the insights of professional casting agents and makeup artists for movies and television. They tend to be very good at not casting somebody who looks wrong for a role.

    A very large fraction of the time when I say to myself: That's bad casting, that person doesn't look like the role he's playing ... it later turns out that he's really a double agent or something similar and the filmmakers wanted me to notice he didn't look quite right for his ostensible role.

    “I’ve always wanted to see a scientific study of the insights of professional casting agents and makeup artists for movies and television. They tend to be very good at not casting somebody who looks wrong for a role.”

    How do you determine this? Could the post hoc casting decision influence the viewer to believe that is what the character should look like? I’ve found very little “continuity control” in casting. Next time you watch a TV show or a movie with actors pretending to be relatives, ask yourself if they look anything alike. Most high budget movies cast highly paid name recognition actors. Plus, you have affirmative action casting where blacks or women are cast in roles that are for White men. Low budget pictures don’t usually care about what people look like.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sparkon
    Straight out of Central Casting:

    The name of this company has developed into a jargon term denoting a provider of generic or a stereotypical character type for film or television. The term has also been adopted outside of the film industry. For example, a person who happens to strongly match a particular stereotype could be said to be "straight out of central casting".
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Casting

    No doubt people judge others by looks. However, as we know:
    Appearances can be misleading.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • From The Atlantic:
  • @Steve Sailer
    Maybe she loved Thomas Jefferson?

    Steve, I’m very disappointed. Have you never researched this issue? The Sally Hemings myth is a lie that originated in the early 19th century by a disappointed office seeker and followed the typical journalistic political assassination techniques of the time. DNA results do not prove Thomas Jefferson was the father. It indicates that one of 25 males of the Jefferson line could be the father. The more obvious candidates are his brother Randolph or a nephew. Not to mention that

    “Hyland reveals that the oft-repeated claim that Jefferson was at Monticello at the time of each Hemings child’s conception failed to stand up under scrutiny even before it was discovered that Sally was not at the plantation throughout the entire period. (It is now known, through the incidental remarks found in various correspondences, that she was periodically hired out to other households and spent time away from the plantation with her mistress Maria.)”

    When you add this to that the fact that Jefferson was 64 at the time of Eton Hemings’ birth and had health issues at the time, Jefferson’s paternity becomes just another scurrilous leftist smear job to tarnish the Founding Fathers. Gordon-Reed herself, an affirmative action negress, is one of the most prominent authors of this lie, one in which she offers no proof but in which she implies that Thomas Jefferson fathered all 6 of Hemings children, not just Eton. But, Sally obviously got around. I’m sure she was raped, though, as everyone knows black women are such paragons of virtue. They would never engage in consensual sex with someone that could benefit their position. Six children? Hmm, must have been rape. At first.

    Anyone that has studied Jefferson’s writings knows how he felt about the black race. He also had an impeccable reputation in his time. Of course, over two hundred years later, the left knows so much more than the White people living at the same time Jefferson did.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Introduction Hip-hop is another cultural artefact attracting the attention of Christians working with young people. Back in January, at the five-day intensive university course for Youth Culture and Ministry, Andrew Root, a professor of youth ministry from Luther Seminary in Minneapolis, devoted an afternoon session to the subject. His very effective audio-visual presentation reflected what...
  • @owen
    Leaving aside a discussion of hip-hop itself, I was fascinated to discover that the short, rhythmic prose we associate with rap music has a history going back to John Skelton in the 1500's. Some examples of his work:

    Or if he speaketh plain
    Then he lacketh brain
    He is but a fool
    Let him go to school.

    My name is Colin Clout.
    I purpose to shake out
    All my cunning bag,
    Like a clerkly hag ;
    For though my rhyme be ragged,
    Tattered and jagged,
    Rudely rain beaten,
    Rusty and moth-eaten,
    If ye take well therewith,
    It hath in it some pith.

    see an article here: http://www.socialmatter.net/2017/02/04/poets-john-skelton/

    Critics make a living out of promoting certain artists above others. Their verbiage is so constructed to imply that the product is more “intellectual”, “innovative”, “exciting”, or a representation of “genius”. Prior to the early days of rap and hip-hop, lyrics or poetry that consisted of standard rap sloganeering would have been condemned as childish, formulaic, cliched, banal, and with no redeeming social value. However, because the introduction of this primitive and alien noise was deemed useful in brainwashing young Whites, critics reframed it as “authentic”, “visceral”, “vital”, any masturbatory adjective that could elevate feces to the level of “art”. Just like in the way those who must not be named introduced blues, R & B, and rock n’ roll into the national dialogue. Establishing an artistic and moral equivalence with the great White musical forms was vital in the deconstructionism of White culture.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Henry's Cat

    Prior to the early days of rap and hip-hop, lyrics or poetry that consisted of standard rap sloganeering would have been condemned as childish, formulaic, cliched, banal, and with no redeeming social value.
     
    Nursery rhymes, in other words.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • This is mental masturbation. The attempt to intellectualize something with no higher meaning than muthaf***er, muhdik, bitch, and gibsmedat is an attempt to elevate a type of noise with no higher qualities to a philosophy. Face it, “crap” is nothing more than “look at me” that your masters recognize has a corrosive effect on your culture and serves to coarsen social interactions. So they raise entire generations on it as “their” music so they will be dumbed down to the level of blacks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    The attempt to intellectualize something with no higher meaning than [garbage]...
     
    That is not only true, but a sick characteristic of "modern" Western "arts" in general, and too often, "science" (e.g., IQ testing) as well. When such offal has been pushed into our faces 24/7, further degeneration is inevitably self amplifying.

    None of this is the fault of Jews alone. In fact, decent Jews are no doubt affected as adversely by the sewage as everyone else.

    Yakov Rabkin, a professor of history at the University of Montreal. The central theme of [ Yakov Rabkin’s] book is how Zionists have exploited Judaism and western traditions to offer Israel as a liberal democracy when it is actually a nationalist colonialists project hanging on by its paranoid fingernails.

    http://mondoweiss.net/2017/06/devastating-tradition-liberalism/
     
    Not only have Zionists exploited Judaism, but so have a wide variety of money grubbers and decent Jews would do well to continue to stand up to the Synagogue of Satan.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Forgive me for complaining, but recent decades have not been easy ones for my peeps. I am from birth a member of the WHAM tribe, that once proud, but now embattled conglomeration of white, heterosexual American males. We have long been -- there’s no denying it -- a privileged group. When the blessings of American...
  • @Corvinus
    "We only want to be life as easy as it was under Eisenhower (to be fair, from Truman to LBJ)."

    Nostalgia has a funny way of warping our sense of reality. Life for some people was "easy" in the 1950's, but for a number of people, it was cold, hard, and dark.

    “Life for some people was “easy” in the 1950′s, but for a number of people, it was cold, hard, and dark.”

    Life has and always will be cold, hard, and dark for some people. Can you point to any point in history where this was not true? Expecting reality to be “fair” is like believing you can identify as a non-cisgendered flaming poo. You can believe all you want, but put that belief in one hand, spit in the other and see which one fills up first.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Sunday, a Navy F-18 Hornet shot down a Syrian air force jet, an act of war against a nation with which Congress has never declared or authorized a war. Washington says the Syrian plane was bombing U.S.-backed rebels. Damascus says its plane was attacking ISIS. Vladimir Putin's defense ministry was direct and blunt: "Repeated combat...
  • @Darin
    People were saying before 1914 that war between great powers would not make any sense, would be unwinnable and therefore will not happen.

    And, unlike WWI, WWIII can be started by one man pushing the button ( and few tens of people following orders)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_close_calls

    One man pushing a button. No, sorry, it will not be started by one man pushing the button. You’ve watched too much TV or too many movies.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There will be no nuclear war. There was never going to be a nuclear war. WWIII has been fought since 1946. Perpetual war for perpetual peace. Now, WWIV might be something to watch for.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Darin
    People were saying before 1914 that war between great powers would not make any sense, would be unwinnable and therefore will not happen.

    And, unlike WWI, WWIII can be started by one man pushing the button ( and few tens of people following orders)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_close_calls
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • From my new column in Taki's Magazine: Read the whole thing there. Pitt's movie War Machine is based on the reporting by Michael Hastings, who died in a spectacular one-car crash in Hollywood in 2013 that spawned so many conspiracy theories that I even left the house to investigate it.
  • @anon
    I thought a blind eye was turned toward opium farming as a way to curry favor with the peasant masses. You know, eff the Taliban; we'll tacitly permit your livelihood.


    In any event, I'm pretty sure domestic opiod consumption plays absolutely zero role in any of the US Military's strategic calculations. They've got a war to fight, for crying out loud!

    There are probably some in the military that understand the real reasons behind the absurdity. But, the common soldiery, not a clue. They’re just trying to stay alive so they can get out of that hellhole.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @HenryA
    I could never understand why we don't do aerial spraying of Afghanistan's opium fields with Roundup. I'm sure we could easily attach aerial sprayers to helicopter gunships. When the Afghans replant next year, we re-spray.

    The opium fields were replanted after the Taliban was defeated. Planted with CIA money and assistance. Opium production surged from a minimal 180 tons to a monumental 8,200 in the first five years of U.S. occupation. do you think anyone in the Swamp would want to decrease opium production? Sure, it would work, if DC wasn’t such an evil place, but cheap narcotics are a useful distraction for the masses.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    I thought a blind eye was turned toward opium farming as a way to curry favor with the peasant masses. You know, eff the Taliban; we'll tacitly permit your livelihood.


    In any event, I'm pretty sure domestic opiod consumption plays absolutely zero role in any of the US Military's strategic calculations. They've got a war to fight, for crying out loud!

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • People, please! The reason America is still in Afghanistan is because, according to the CIA Factbook, Afghanistan is the world’s primary opium producer, accounting for 82% of the global supply. They weren’t when the Taliban ruled. Do you not understand that this provides the people that own you, your children, and everything you pretend to hold dear, with literally trillions of dollars in revenue? It also serves the insidious purpose of anesthetizing millions of people worldwide so they won’t care that they are slaves.

    Read More
    • Replies: @HenryA
    I could never understand why we don't do aerial spraying of Afghanistan's opium fields with Roundup. I'm sure we could easily attach aerial sprayers to helicopter gunships. When the Afghans replant next year, we re-spray.
    , @mobi

    People, please! The reason America is still in Afghanistan is because, according to the CIA Factbook, Afghanistan is the world’s primary opium producer, accounting for 82% of the global supply. They weren’t when the Taliban ruled. Do you not understand that this provides the people that own you, your children, and everything you pretend to hold dear, with literally trillions of dollars in revenue? It also serves the insidious purpose of anesthetizing millions of people worldwide so they won’t care that they are slaves.
     
    You would think, with all their smarts and resources, they'd have seen Fentanyl coming.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Curiously, what made me give up all interest in the problems of blacks was not their virulent racism, their horrendous rates of crime, or their parasitism. Instead it was the assaults by blacks and their fellow travelers on Confederate monuments, particularly in New Orleans. Similarly, the banning of the Confederate battle flag at Gettysburg, for...
  • “Curiously, what made me give up all interest in the problems of blacks was not their virulent racism, their horrendous rates of crime, or their parasitism. Instead it was the assaults by blacks and their fellow travelers on Confederate monuments, particularly in New Orleans.”

    You mean after 50 years of TNB, you’ve actually had an “interest” in the problems of blacks up until a few weeks ago, Fred? Hmm, a bit slow, are we?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Last weekend’s clash in Portland OR was further evidence that the Alt Right, loosely defined, can field force on the streets—a completely new development in recent American politics (Portland Breathes a Sigh of Relief after Weekend Protester Showdown. But Several Questions Persist About Police Tactics| Police cracked down on only one side—the protesters who threw...
  • “For that reason, as Hines predicted, if there is a second American Civil War, we can expect most of the casualties in the beginning will be on the conservative side.”

    Let us hope so. If the initial casualties are leftists then the MSM will make sure that the “Martyrs” are glorified, have candlelight vigils for, get constant virtue signaling for years, eventually get a monument (and possible national holiday), and enter the history books to indoctrinate kindergarteners with the glory of the fallen comrades of la révolution. If the initial casualties are rightists, the MSM and the left will be relatively silent because they know they will have lost the “moral high ground”. Even though there is no legitimate morality on the left.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • As published in Harper’s Magazine. Let’s start with your 2006 Harper’s article. What did you see happening at that point? It was very clear that more and more of everybody’s income had to go to buying a
  • @jacques sheete

    I don’t consider it unearned.
     
    I have no doubt you've earned every penny, but I suspect Hudson is using the term in a specific, "academic" sense and that it probably doesn't have the same meaning that you and I would use in ordinary speech.

    I admit I haven't read the article yet, but I intend to especially since Hudson is a better thinker than most. Waaay better than the bankster mouthpieces, the Krugmans of the world, although I admit that's a pretty low bar.

    Well, he is an academic and an economist. Talk about unearned income! He knows words have meanings and, like most academics, he uses them as a bludgeon to advance his preferred objective. Rent as unearned income is similar to being told by Obama that businesses didn’t “build” that business.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Dashed line is institutionalization rate (prison + asylum), solid line is homicide rate. First year is 1928, last year 2000. Crossover points are c. 1936 (homicides falling), c. 1968 (homicides rising), and c. 1996 (homicides falling). Most news media coverage you read about how we must End Mass Incarceration Now starts with the factoid that...
  • @Flip
    I agree with Charles Murray who said that the state shouldn't provide welfare for children to unmarried women. We should pay for abortion or adoption/orphanages. My great-great grandmother was widowed in her early 20s with a newborn, and she then married another guy and had more children. She probably would have stayed a single mother if welfare had been available to my great grandfather's detriment.

    “We should pay for abortion or adoption/orphanages.”

    Paying for abortion makes the State, and hence, the masses an accessory to the murder of millions of innocents. With whatever karma that entails. There will always be sluts or childish women that will use their genitalia to acquire children they expect some male to support. If you shame them in public, the female herd will eventually realize that this behavior does not benefit them in any way. Reality is a bitch, isn’t it? But, it works. Interfering in it does not.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Judah Benjamin Hur
    I'm very sympathetic to many well-intentioned 1960s policies. I was only alive at the very end of the 60s, but I sort-of default to the Gene Roddenberry worldview until my brain kicks in. However, I'm not sympathetic to ignoring 50+ years of data that proves a lot of the 60s ideas were bunk, or at least need serious modification. I'm also convinced that some acknowledgement of HBD issues are necessary.

    Actually, what are the policies from the 1960′s that you are still sympathetic to? Legalization of pot? Indiscriminate sex? Mass non-White immigration legislation? The only one I still have any respect for is some of the music from that era. Not the self-righteous, preachy, we know better than you, but some of the greatest popular music of all time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In the years since the 2008 economic crisis, financial transactions taxes (FTTs) have gone from a fringe idea to a policy that is in mainstream policy debates. They are seen as a way to both raise large amounts of money and to slow the pace of churning in financial markets. For this reason, most progressive...
  • Redistribution of wealth is a religious dream that will never be accomplished. The people that promote it should be allowed to put their money where their mouths are and volunteer to pay more of their own “wealth” to support the parasites that take advantage of being losers. Understand this: your politicians use wealth redistribution for two reasons. First, to get elected and re-elected so they can keep their snouts in the pig trough. Second, borrow money into existence to pay for ridiculous schemes in ridiculous amounts and accrue more debt for the productive individuals. They don’t give two bowel movements about the people that the money is given too, or to the idiots that vote their “feelings”. Those of you that do participate in this swindle are useful idiots and have never bothered to think about the fragile nature of human interaction. The “system” will not go on for ever and never has. Another “system” will be substituted at some point and then you can pat yourselves on the back as to how enlightened you were in giving someone else’s money to a thousand people that do need help (and could get it through private charities if government wasn’t taking so much of your money) and also to the millions that are thieves and parasites. Thanks for being so “enlightened”!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Do you wonder why the legacy media are such puzzled otherworldly twits? Why, for example, they had no idea what was happening in the recent election? Why they seem to know so very little about America or much of anything else? Some thoughts from a guy who spent a career in the racket: Ask journalists...
  • @Negrolphin Pool
    The types of journalists and journolasses that show up on Bill Maher's show, for example, is probably what Fred had in mind. As long as you excluded the blacks, I think it's pretty safe to say you could form a large MENSA contingent if you forced them all to take the test. I'm thinking David Frum, that dotter reg chick, David Brooks etc.

    “The types of journalists and journolasses that show up on Bill Maher’s show, for example, is probably what Fred had in mind.”

    Please don’t tell me you think Maher is a MENSA quality intellect?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    You have a rather inflated opinion of MENSA.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Journalists are not stupid, running to well above average in intelligence. You could form a large chapter of Mensa by raiding newsrooms in Washington.”

    I have NEVER seen any evidence of this. I notice that Fred didn’t provide any data for these two comments.

    Read More
    • Agree: Andrei Martyanov
    • Replies: @Negrolphin Pool
    The types of journalists and journolasses that show up on Bill Maher's show, for example, is probably what Fred had in mind. As long as you excluded the blacks, I think it's pretty safe to say you could form a large MENSA contingent if you forced them all to take the test. I'm thinking David Frum, that dotter reg chick, David Brooks etc.
    , @Renault
    Well, it's tough to get a real job in journalism in DC/NYC if you didn't go to a good (read Ivy or similar) school, and it's pretty tough to get into said schools unless you're at least two standard deviations above the mean intelligence-wise.

    Journalists these days are very often wrong, but they're certainly not stupid.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • President Trump leaves the Middle East today, having done his bit to make the region even more divided and mired in conflict than it was before. At the same moment that Donald Trump was condemning the suicide bomber in Manchester as “an evil loser in life”, he was adding to the chaos in which al-Qaeda...
  • @Ivar the Legless
    Yes, the US and its imperialist running dogs should stop making war in the Middle East and yes, the Sunnis are guilty of more terrorist outrages than the Shia, but we still need to get the Muslims out of western countries.

    We've done it before - in Spain in 1492.

    We need to put pressure on the Muslims; either abandon the faith or live elsewhere.

    Muslim countries were not Muslim to begin with. After Muslim conquest, the existing faiths were put under pressure - by the Jizyah and other humiliations. Eventually the conquered succumbed and converted to the invaders faith. We need to do the same.

    “We need to put pressure on the Muslims; either abandon the faith or live elsewhere.”

    Since all “faiths”, even atheism, have been reduced to a meaningless equivalence, you would have to begin re-establishing a “faith” for the West before this can even be addressed. Try taking a religious argument to the secular high courts and see how far you get.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Why is it a “conspiracy theory” to think that a disgruntled Democratic National Committee staffer gave WikiLeaks the DNC emails, but not a conspiracy theory to think the emails were provided by Russia? Why? Which is the more likely scenario: That a frustrated employee leaked damaging emails to embarrass his bosses or a that foreign...
  • “Trump might be the worst US president of all time, in fact, he probably is.”

    I am no fan of Trump, but how can anyone make such a statement concerning someone that has only been in office for 4 months? I have noticed Whitney’s writing before. He has ridiculous comments inserted in with lucid ones. I wonder if his residence in Washington State is the cause of his delusions?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In a period of seven days this month, President Donald Trump fired James Comey as director of the FBI and was accused of sharing top-secret intelligence data with the Russian foreign minister and the Russian ambassador to the United States, the latter a known Russian spy. The Comey firing was clumsy and rude. Comey learned...
  • Apparently, “Judge” Napolitano can’t differentiate gas lighting from reality.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Donald Trump's election has elicited impassioned affirmations of a renewed commitment to unvarnished truth-telling from the prestige media. The common theme: you know you can’t trust him, but trust us to keep dogging him on your behalf. The New York Times has even unveiled a portentous new promotional slogan: “The truth is now more important...
  • “The conflict commonly referred to as the Afghanistan War is now the longest in U.S. history — having lasted longer than the Civil War, World War I, and World War II combined. What is the Pentagon’s plan for concluding that conflict? When might Americans expect it to end? On what terms?”

    As long as Afghanistan is the or one of the largest producers of opium, US troops will remain there in order to make sure that illicit demand can result in astronomical profits for those involved.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The New York Times is agog that Hollywood in 2017 is daring to challenge the societal taboo against action movies in which beautiful actresses who subsist on celery beat up hordes of beefy stuntmen. Women Who Have the Chops (and the Punches and the Kicks) Leer en español By JULIE BLOOM MAY 5, 2017 Speeding...
  • Physics proves that women are almost always incapable of delivering blows of sufficient power to kick a man’s butt. Why? Mass and velocity. The equation for kinetic energy is KE = 0.5 x m(v2). Here m stands for mass, the measure of how much matter is in an object, and v stands for velocity of the object, or the rate at which the object changes its position. If a woman has a larger mass than a male, the amount of mass in the equation would produce more force. But, the value of “speed” in the equation is squared. If the velocity is twice as fast, its value is then squared. Speed is much more important in the production of kinetic energy. Men are usually faster. A man is usually going to have more mass and more speed so the punch energy will be more. Add to this the fact that men are more aggressive, usually have more experience in fighting, have more skeletal density, and are taller with a longer reach, the fiction that a 110 lb. female could outfight a 220 lb. male is laughable. But then, beta male nerds like watching girls fight.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • With the upcoming French Presidential election in France the topic of Islam in Europe has again become central to the political discourse. This is nothing new, we also saw that in the UK, in Holland, in Austria and even in Switzerland where the Muslim communities were banned – by popular referendum - from building minarets...
  • @ia
    I'm not even sure "India" had anything resembling money in 1000 AD. There must have been many rajputs and maybe a fluid empire or two but surely no money or any way to calculate and relate to post-industrial GDP. Rather a barter economy I'd think.

    Paper money, no. But, punch marked silver ingots in circulation around the 5th century BCE and the first metallic coins minted around the 6th century BCE by the Mahajanapadas of the Gangetic plains were the earliest traces of coinage in India. While India’s many kingdoms and rulers issued coins, barter was still widely prevalent. Also, since today we have country specific currency and coinage, we forget that older civilizations had no problem accepting gold and silver coins from other parts of the world. They would possess a certain quantity of gold and silver, which would determine their intrinsic value. You could find Persian, Greek, Chinese, and Muslim coins in circulation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Numinous

    Do you think that on those minuscule occasions that a White migrates to a non-White country they practice what you consider “racism”?
     
    Of course they don't today. Post-1940s liberalism is highly ingrained into the Western mindset now (though maybe it's receding a bit, given the evidence of recent events.) But they most definitely harbored racist views when they migrated during the colonial era. Every country having a European community that wasn't in Europe was a de facto apartheid state, with whites forming the ruling class.

    On forums like these, it's hard to make cogent arguments when the targets keep moving. Whites of bygone eras deserve the criticism directed towards them. Not so today's whites, who are among the most liberal people on the planet. I'm not sure why it's so hard to separate these two for the sake of argument. Is it because of the HBD-dominated ideology prevailing here, which treats people as essentially unchanging but tribes as widely differing?

    “Is it because of the HBD-dominated ideology prevailing here, which treats people as essentially unchanging but tribes as widely differing?”

    And you don’t see that both can occur at the same time? “Unchanging” and “differing” can both be true.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Numinous
    The Japanese had a traumatic encounter with European power in the middle of the 19th century, and then (being smart people) decided to get ahead themselves by closely observing Europeans (and colonials and Americans....) and trying to emulate them as best as they could. European settlers practiced racism. Europeans colonizing other countries (India, SE Asia, N. Africa) practiced racism. Mid-19th century was also the period when scientific racism was peaking, so Japan, which wanted to ascend the food chain, thought it needed its own "ni.....rs" to kick around. So they picked miscellaneous East Asians (starting with the Koreans, then moving on to the Chinese....until Hiroshima and Nagasaki came to bite them in their rears.)

    People living in their own country tend to be a conservative bunch, and "prefer their own" (I agree with you there.) But only whites have practiced racism when they have migrated abroad, so I will treat them as unique in that respect. There is a substantial Japanese diaspora in South American countries like Peru and Brazil; I have no information to suggest that they are especially racist towards people other races there; to the contrary, they seem to blend so well that the Japanese in the motherland consider them to be aliens.

    “People living in their own country tend to be a conservative bunch, and “prefer their own” (I agree with you there.) But only whites have practiced racism when they have migrated abroad, so I will treat them as unique in that respect. There is a substantial Japanese diaspora in South American countries like Peru and Brazil; I have no information to suggest that they are especially racist towards people other races there; to the contrary, they seem to blend so well that the Japanese in the motherland consider them to be aliens.”

    Your reasoning is one-dimensional and faulty. Are you saying the Assyrians didn’t practice racism when they “migrated abroad”? Do you not grasp the difference between military conquest and migration? The Japanese practiced what you foolishly would call “racism” when they invaded every country they occupied in WWII. Just like the British in India, or the Aztecs in Mexico, they viewed their own nation as the group they existed within and performed any actions based on how it benefited their “race”. And as far as the Japanese in South America, they did not invade. They “migrated”. They were in the minority and probably actually viewed the host population as inferior. But, the Japanese are herd animals and will cooperate for the good of the entire organism. Just like Whites today. Do you think that on those minuscule occasions that a White migrates to a non-White country they practice what you consider “racism”? You are comparing apples to oranges and coming up with fig preserves.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Whether or not East Asian countries practice racism, I can't think of one that's mindless enough to encourage unlimited immigration with no standards at all. That borders on insanity and makes little logical sense.

    No society can be a free for all; we still live in a world of limited resources and unlimited wants, I mean.

    , @Numinous

    Do you think that on those minuscule occasions that a White migrates to a non-White country they practice what you consider “racism”?
     
    Of course they don't today. Post-1940s liberalism is highly ingrained into the Western mindset now (though maybe it's receding a bit, given the evidence of recent events.) But they most definitely harbored racist views when they migrated during the colonial era. Every country having a European community that wasn't in Europe was a de facto apartheid state, with whites forming the ruling class.

    On forums like these, it's hard to make cogent arguments when the targets keep moving. Whites of bygone eras deserve the criticism directed towards them. Not so today's whites, who are among the most liberal people on the planet. I'm not sure why it's so hard to separate these two for the sake of argument. Is it because of the HBD-dominated ideology prevailing here, which treats people as essentially unchanging but tribes as widely differing?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jilles dykstra
    " It is a civilization committed to territorial expansion and occupation."

    Islamic Spain shows that the assertion is false.
    Richard Fletcher, ‘Moorish Spain’, Berkeley 1992

    The Ottoman empire also was tolerant, as long as each religious group paid taxes, they had autonomy.
    Jason Goodwin, ‘Lords of the Horizons, A History of the Ottoman Empire’, New York, 1999
    Mark Mazower, 'Thessaloniki - stad van geesten, Christenen, moslims en joden 1430 - 1950', 2007, geen plaats van uitgave, (2004, Salonica - City of Ghosts)

    ” ‘It is a civilization committed to territorial expansion and occupation.’

    Islamic Spain shows that the assertion is false.
    Richard Fletcher, ‘Moorish Spain’, Berkeley 1992″

    So, you are saying that they are not committed to territorial expansion and occupation based on a country they performed a territorial expansion into and then occupied? Not too bright.

    “The Ottoman empire also was tolerant, as long as each religious group paid taxes, they had autonomy.”

    Apparently, you also exist in some kind of non-linear time dimension. Was the Ottoman empire tolerant while they were invading, killing and pillaging the countries they militarily occupied? And what empire in the entire world has NOT been tolerant as long as the defeated country paid their taxes? The autonomy you think they allowed for their conquered countries only existed as long as they did what they were told. You might want to lookup the Janissaries. I’m sure even you would think their kidnapping as children did not correspond to autonomy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists published a study, on 1 March 2017, which opened: It continues: This study was co-authored by America’s top three scientists specializing in analysis of weaponry and especially of the geostrategic balance between nations: Hans Kristensen, Matthew McKinzie, and Theodore Postol. Their report continues: This vast increase in US nuclear...
  • I don’t understand how after 70 years of using “nuclear weapons” as a bludgeon to keep the mindless slaves of the West in line anyone would actually think that there is any real possibility of a nuclear war. The media has been used to induce fear in people that don’t think. Start thinking!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Miro23
    It's hard to disagree with this article but the missing background is the US public.

    Americans have shown no remorse whatsoever for the murder of 100.000's of civilians in the Middle East. They are indifferent to the WMD lies, don't care about the destruction they have caused, and show zero empathy for their victims. Also keep in mind that young Americans ARE prepared to spend a lot of time on the rights and wrongs of so called campus "micro-aggression" and transgender "toilet rights".

    If Russia was destroyed overnight and 50 million Russians killed, no doubt the reaction would be the same - indifference. The US public has truly disconnected from moral responsibility , and only has interest in things that affect it directly, either physically or financially.

    If for example, the public had had to pay a supplementary war tax of $2000 per person for each Middle East war, there would no doubt have been a major outcry, and the wars would probably never have happened, but in the event, the FED was there to quietly provide the funding and unobviously put the public in debt. Their grandchildren will pay the bill, and truthfully, they're not really bothered about that either.

    Equally, as an extra precaution, the public is carefully sheltered from the reality of bombed cities and murdered and homeless families. The war party MSM excludes every trace of human interest related to the wanton murder of Arabs - calling them "Terrorists" which the dumb American public accepts while "nuke em" seems to be the even dumber and brainless reaction.

    If a nuclear bomb did actually explode on Washington D.C. the public would be as helpless as a crowd of babies, same as after the New Orleans disaster.

    It seems that Joseph de Maistre wrote, "toute nation a le gouvernement qu’elle mérite". Translated, this means "Every country has the government it deserves" but now it's a true disaster for the whole world, not just America.

    “If Russia was destroyed overnight and 50 million Russians killed, no doubt the reaction would be the same – indifference. The US public has truly disconnected from moral responsibility , and only has interest in things that affect it directly, either physically or financially.”

    Do you actually believe that if the US launched a nuclear strike against Russia that there would be no US casualties? Wouldn’t that “physically affect” the idiot masses that apparently you are superior to morally?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The dizzying spiral of incompetent military and political interventions carried out by Washington in the Middle East suggests strongly that the best U.S. foreign policy would be one that is essentially inert. One only has to look at the inherent contradictions in what appears to be the Trump Administration policy towards Syria to understand how...
  • “Erdogan’s electoral fraud must be challenged”

    If it does, let the Turks do it. Why do the arm chair generals here always want to interfere in another country’s affairs? Apparently, they are not interested in their own country’s problems. There’s some quote from someone famous about removing the beam from your own eye first. What a novel idea. Take care of your own problems and let some country on the other side of the world take care of theirs. If they don’t, too bad, so sad.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Introduction: US Empire building on a world-scale began during and shortly after WWII. Washington intervened directly in the Chinese civil war (providing arms to Chiang Kai Shek’s army while the Red Army battled the Japanese), backed France’s re-colonization war against the Viet Minh in Indo-China and installed Japanese imperial collaborator-puppet regimes in South Korea, Taiwan...
  • Petras implies that the Chinese “miracle” was driven and achieved by China alone. It was actually driven by Western business and financial interests that wanted to cripple the West and also to decrease their cost of production. Chinese labor was essentially slave labor, so that cost was drastically reduced. The Chinese were a relatively passive, educated, and of a massive population. They had no unions, people could live for pennies a day, and the government provided land and incentives for Western oligarchs to move their manufacturing base to China.

    What will be interesting to watch is how the “workers” in China respond to their relatively poor condition. The genie is out of the bottle. They’ve had a taste of disposable income, modern amenities, and technology. Let’s see if the dragon can control them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk
    Any idea how many CIA/MI6 trouble makers are running amok in China ?
    , @Alden
    Senator Feinstein's husband Richard Blum was heavily involved in that years before the Nixon/Kissinger opening to China. His investments in the PRC made him and the Senator multi billionaires.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @The Alarmist

    "This means US troops will operate (illegally) face-to-face with the advancing Syrian army, who are backed by Russian military air support (legally)."
     
    You don't seem to understand the definitions of legal and illegal in the current context: Anything the US declares legal and subject to its jurisdiction anywhere in the world is legal, otherwise it is still subject to US interpretation on its legality or not. In other words, US troops always operate legally, international law notwithstanding, and US laws have effect everywhere and at all times.

    The difference between “legal”, which is whatever the law says, and “lawful”. De facto vs. de jure.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    I don't profess to have a precise distinction in mind for "legal" v. " lawful" but I am sure the de jure/ de facto distinction is, well, a distinctly different one. "Lawful" is surely somewhat broader in its range of connotations. In particular it can be used metaphorically.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The more dangerous America’s crackpot President becomes, the saner the world believes him to be. Just look back at the initial half of his first 100 days: the crazed tweeting, the lies, the fantasies and self-regard of this misogynist leader of the Western world appalled all of us. But the moment he went to war...
  • @jacques sheete

    This site gets more anti-American by the day.
     
    Which America you talkin about? The one it's become or the one in your dreams?

    If you loved what America is supposed to stand for, you'd also be against what it's become.

    You want a pity party er sumpin? Go elsewhere.

    What is America “supposed” to stand for and when was this agreed upon by anyone? Facts, remember. Not your “opinion”.

    Read More
    • Troll: jacques sheete
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Antonin Chigurh
    Crackpot?

    Misogyny?

    Where am I? The Guardian? What is this leftist trash? What has happened to Unz? This place was one of the last ones.

    Since I have been reading Utz, there have always been articles posted by leftist authors. I don’t think Steve Sailer or the others agree with them. I think it is a know your enemy kind of thing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • BART police are beefing up patrols at Oakland stations after dozens of juveniles terrorized riders Saturday night when they invaded the Coliseum Station and commandeered at least one train car, forcing passengers to hand over bags and cell phones and leaving at least two with head injuries. The incident occurred around 9:30 p.m. Saturday. Witnesses...
  • @jacques sheete


    Your attempt at a tu quoque deflection only shows you can’t argue using facts, only that you want to derail the argument.
     

    It does?.
     
    Yes. It does.
     
    How duzzit? The onus probandi is on you, res.

    This thread is fast becoming a Latin review. Who derailed it? (Pun intended.)

    A tu quoque comment’s sole purpose is to not address the facts. Yes, blacks are more violent, criminal, and aggressive than Whites. I tried to post some links but Unz.com did not let me post them because it interpreted them as spam. I will try to do three without the http and see what happens. Nope, didn’t work. Look up the Color of Crime, Does MAOA gene make black people more violent, and Black crime facts that the white liberal media daren’t talk about.

    “I think we as a society have bigger problems than a few ill bred, mostly white “niggers.” I’d be willing to bet most of them got their “mean genes” from the slave owners what raped and bred their foremothers.”

    Nigga, plez! “We as a society”. What you mean we, paleface? Do you mean Trump supporters? I guess that is easier to believe than to actually think about what a fool you are. And I know it is hard to believe given the chaste behavior of modern black women, but slave owners did not rape those negro’s ancestors. This is a myth to try and make White women emphasize with those “poor” slaves and to give negroes an excuse for their behavior. Whites that raped blacks in the South were basically ostracized or disciplined severely. Southerners did not countenance such behavior. The black women that had sex with White men did so with the intention of getting something out of the relationship. Money, an easier life, a better job, a pretty trinket, a child. Ultimately, why do all women have sex with men? I mean, where do you think this rape occurred? In the slave quarters? In the mansion? Simon Legree was a fictional character, just like Uncle Tom, junior

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jim Christian
    You are correct AWM, although I ain't digging up links and attribution. Justice Department stats prior to the arrival at the AG's office of Loretta Lynch (who replaced Eric Holder as Obama's AG in 2012), routinely reported Black-on-White rapes at ratios of 10 or 12 THOUSAND to 1 vs. White-on-Black rapes. That was routine going back to the gathering of such statistics. If you read Paul Kersey's books about the systematic destruction of civil life in our cities by the Black hoards, you'll find that he quotes the Federal crime stats of White-on-Black crime in general and the contrasts are startling, as in un-fucking-believable. Paul has extensive attribution for all this in his charts in his books. Of course, Lynch decided, as in her handling of Hillary's email servers, that none of that be made public anymore, around 2013 or 2014. The crimes are listed, but not the perps' vs. victims' races. I suppose Sessions will follow the new tradition of not reporting such lob-sided statistics because that would be ray-ciss.

    Black males are committing, as 6% of our population (because it's men doing the crimes, nearly all of that is 12-25 year old men, making the violent group an even tinier percentage, maybe 2 or 3% of total population), 80-odd percent of the violent crime in this country. Whites are bound to get in the way by dint of Whites' sheer numbers in the population. And what does THAT say? Stay away from violent, African American diversity, their stomping grounds, their hoods, their public transit, their schools, etc. The percentages are lousy and you aren't even allowed to defend yourself. That would be ray-ciss. But BART isn't rare, this stuff has been going on for many decades everywhere there are Blacks. It's the reportage that's rare, not the crimes. The press simply won't report 99.999% of it. And FBI doesn't even gather it anymore. Bet it's only gotten worse since last they did.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Heymrguda
    It doesn't have to be this way. In hi school in the 60s I rode the bus into an exclusively black neighborhood, and they had the numbers to wreak havoc on us whites had they wanted to. But they were always quiet and minded their own business. No profanities, obscenities, nothing. The worst I ever got was when one of the gals giggled and said ... you need some head and Shoulders, boy. FaR worse were the white
    male bullies.
    What we're seeing is the result of 50 years of a steady drumbeat of indoctrination and propaganda from our "elites" in education, entertainment and elsewhere.

    You mean they didn’t drag you off the bus and kill you? Be honest. What percentage of the students in your desegregated school in the 60′s were black?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jacques sheete

    It also revolves around the fact that blacks are more violent, animalistic, and desperate.
     
    Yup, that accounts for who started all the significant wars of the past few millenia. For sure. Yup.

    Are all politicians, bankers and corporate thieves black?

    “jacques sheete says:

    Yup, that accounts for who started all the significant wars of the past few millenia. For sure. Yup.”

    You mean other than the significant wars that occurred due to the Chinese, Mongels, Indians, Arabs and other muslims? Your attempt at a tu quoque deflection only shows you can’t argue using facts, only that you want to derail the argument. And as far as Whites being responsible for “all” wars, you might want to review the wars that have occurred in Africa, black on black, over the past century. Their barbarity is unbelievable. Yeah, Whites are better at war, but then, we’re better at everything. Except runnin’, jumpin’, and hollerin’.

    “Are all politicians, bankers and corporate thieves black?”

    An UNBELIEVABLE amount of politicians. But for bankers and corporate thieves they would need to be an Affirmative Action candidate because they just don’t have the intelligence or initiative. You might want to research the large numbers of those who can’t be named that can pass for White in these fields as well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Your attempt at a tu quoque deflection only shows you can’t argue using facts, only that you want to derail the argument.
     
    It does?

    What does your evaluation of my abilities have to do with arguing the facts? Hmmmm?


    ...because they just don’t have the intelligence or initiative.
     
    If that's the case then why are you whining and filling your shorts over them? I think we as a society have bigger problems than a few ill bred, mostly white "niggers." I'd be willing to bet most of them got their "mean genes" from the slave owners what raped and bred their foremothers.

    Illegitimi non vos averteret.

    (Don't let the bastards distract ya, Sweet Thang!) ;)
     

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    The strongest individual may be white or Iranian or something.

    I'm not talking of that stuff.

    I'm talking of all-around toughness in speed, coordination, hardiness, and etc.

    I've seen race relations all my life in integrated setting, and blacks routinely whup whites.

    Blacks got more fast twitch muscle. Also, at gyms, I see negroes routinely out-lifting whites.

    Sure, some white guys are very big and strong, but when it comes to pound for pound strength, blacks beat whites.

    As I told you, toughness is an abstract variable that can’t be quantified. And now you are saying that blacks aren’t “stronger”, they are “stronger pound for pound”. OK, show us the evidence for this. I can prove that the strongest men are usually White, now prove to me, with actual evidence, that blacks are stronger pound for pound. Your anecdotes are that you’ve seen race relations and blacks routinely “whup” Whites. You’ve also said that you’ve “seen” blacks in the gym routinely outlifting Whites. Neither of these observation are proof. Merely your particular anecdotal experience. It also revolves around the fact that blacks are more violent, animalistic, and desperate. Whites want to avoid confrontations so they often don’t react to black aggression as quickly and forcefully as necessary. I would also posit that your “race relations” scenario involved mostly young people, didn’t they? Blacks mature physically faster than Whites. “Race relations” often involve packs of blacks and criminal behavior, don’t they?

    Analyze why blacks have dominated, at least until the last decade or so, heavyweight boxing. It has nothing to do with strength or “toughness”. It has to do with foot speed, arm length and a thicker cranium. Yes, blacks do tend to be faster in foot speed and muscle twitch. Speed is power. The equation for force involves mass and speed. If two boxers are the same mass but one is able to throw a punch with more speed, the force generated by the speed will add twice as much to the force as the mass. Add this to a natural arm length advantage and viola, this explains the difference. Please try and be honest. The sports that blacks “dominate” have to do with their legs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marty
    My god you're an egregious asshole. Analyze why you've never seen a single white guy whup a black on the street, your whole life. And noone you know's ever seen it. Or even heard about it. Where's the analog of Richie Allen knocks out Frank Thomas, Randall knocks out Lucchesi, Kermit Washngton collapses Tomjanovich's face, or Sprewell strangles Car!esimo? I punched a 19 year old black kid in the face in Berkeley in 1988. No effect, but my hand was useless for a week.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The Pentagon’s plan for seizing and occupying territory in east Syria is beginning to take shape. According to a Fox News exclusive: The move by ISIS corresponds to the secretive massing of US troops and military equipment on the Syria-Jordan border. It creates the perfect pretext for a ground invasion followed by a long-term military...
  • @SolontoCroesus
    the kicker is the Russians won that war that the USA built 35+ - years of prosperity upon.

    Putin is not Joe Stalin.

    But, the United States shipped supplies and weaponry to the USSR during the war. The US, England, and Canada shipped $130 billion in aid to the USSR with the US providing most of it. This from a Russian historian.

    http://rbth.com/business/2015/05/08/allies_gave_soviets_130_billion_under_lend-lease_45879.html

    The USSR might have been able to push the Germans out of Russia without Lend-Lease but the opinion seems to be that it wouldn’t have happened till after 1945.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bluedog
    Damn cheap at any price for Russia took out one and a half to two million German soldiers some of the best Germany had, and if they had been in France its doubtful we would have ever won without a bloodbath of out troops.
    , @Andrei Martyanov

    The USSR might have been able to push the Germans out of Russia without Lend-Lease but the opinion seems to be that it wouldn’t have happened till after 1945.
     
    We have been through this so many times on these discussion boards. While Lend-Lease was an important help... but let's US Military Academy at West Point speak, plus others.

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-c5hbLfJ9AVw/VjT_ccnWrtI/AAAAAAAAAOk/kDjVXsYCUGs/s1600/Glantz-House_2.jpg

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-A-bbcZU50dU/VjT_cQAbxDI/AAAAAAAAAOo/vC-BHm5guJc/s1600/West-Point_3.jpg

    There is a huge reason why Western, especially US, military historiography continued till 1990s to play with numbers and causalities of WW II. American superpowerdom was born in the crucible of the European theater of operations because Soviet Union took the brunt (varies from 75 to 80%) of cream of the cream of Wehrmacht (and Axis allies) on itself and by 1943 ground them to a complete halt and bled them white. By early 1944 Wehrmacht was pretty much done as the force which conquered Europe in a matter of weeks, not to speak about the force which was a backbone of Barbarossa in 1941.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • BART police are beefing up patrols at Oakland stations after dozens of juveniles terrorized riders Saturday night when they invaded the Coliseum Station and commandeered at least one train car, forcing passengers to hand over bags and cell phones and leaving at least two with head injuries. The incident occurred around 9:30 p.m. Saturday. Witnesses...
  • @Anon
    Slavery excuse is lame. Besides, blacks had slavery in Africa for 10,000 yrs.

    No, the reason for black violence is simple.

    Blacks are naturally tougher, stronger, and more aggressive. The fact that this simple obvious truth cannot be said speaks volumes about the Culture of Deception that defines this nation(that is instead obsessed with fantasies of Russian hacking).

    Look at Australia. There, black migrants were welcomed with open arms and showered with benefits.
    Their behavior?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOx8B3O-nDo

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91ZmTXCRII8

    “Blacks are naturally tougher, stronger,”

    How do you figure that? Tougher is a vague term that means nothing. Stronger?

    “That’s why I was struck by the Whiteness of the 2012 World’s Strongest Man competition while watching a replay of it on Youtube last weekend. That Whiteness was made even more striking by the fact that the event was recorded just outside Los Angeles — in possibly the most “diverse” county in America — yet all ten of the athletes in the final, were White. And that is just an extension of the racial reality of strength competition.”

    “Year in and year out, over 90 percent of the World’s Strongest Man competitors are White. And what’s more, the few non-Whites who are invited to the competition for “diversity’s” sake, routinely place in the bottom half of the competition. Usually dead last or very near it. This, of course, shows that they are really not qualified but are given the opportunity because of the event organizers anti-White desire to promote “diversity.”

    “White domination extends to all other strength sports as well. In fact, White men dominate any athletic endeavor founded in strength. Since their inception, they have dominated power-lifting and Olympic weightlifting competitions. They tend to predominate in the “field” events of track & field, Olympic wrestling (both freestyle and Greco Roman), and are even over-represented in the offensive lines of the NFL.”

    Still hasn’t changed since 2012.

    https://theforemostproblem.blogspot.com/2013/01/white-power-white-domination-of.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    The strongest individual may be white or Iranian or something.

    I'm not talking of that stuff.

    I'm talking of all-around toughness in speed, coordination, hardiness, and etc.

    I've seen race relations all my life in integrated setting, and blacks routinely whup whites.

    Blacks got more fast twitch muscle. Also, at gyms, I see negroes routinely out-lifting whites.

    Sure, some white guys are very big and strong, but when it comes to pound for pound strength, blacks beat whites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Ahh, they were “juveniles”. I wonder what that really means? We already know what “youths” means. Did they have to change their word of choice because it had become obvious?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alfa158
    I already have; I troll people by telling them that since "youths" is now commonly known to be a euphemism for the dreaded N word, it's use by White people is therefore racist. Personally, I prefer the term "youngsters", because it sounds so wholesome. We should start that as a trend.
    , @David In TN
    The story used "teenagers" once. The word "teens" used to be common in these stories, maybe it's becoming politically incorrect.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The Pentagon’s plan for seizing and occupying territory in east Syria is beginning to take shape. According to a Fox News exclusive: The move by ISIS corresponds to the secretive massing of US troops and military equipment on the Syria-Jordan border. It creates the perfect pretext for a ground invasion followed by a long-term military...
  • @KenH
    "Mad Dog" is just one of the many Dr. Strangelove characters Trump has filled his cabinet with. I now understand why Obama forced him into retirement.

    Mad Dog was in Israel recently getting his latest orders from Bibi Nutanyahoo, so no doubt we'll be taking further military actions designed to weaken the Assad regime since Israel's too cowardsly to do it themselves. Besides that's what their goy American slaves are for.

    Since we're the worst nation builders in world history and think the average ME Muslim is just like the average Iowan or Kansan, it won't be long before Syria is a complete friggin mess and Trump breaks yet another campaign promise to accommodate hundreds of thousands of Muslim refugees. And Christians if they don't all get martyred.

    I honestly don’t understand how anyone can believe that Obama did anything or that there is any difference in who runs this nation now, under Trump, than there was when the gay mullato was in office.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @bob sykes
    The huge disconnect between Trump's campaign, in which he promised to wind down our wars and improve relations with Russia and China, and the gross war mongering now underway suggests that the US has suffered a quiet coup d'etat, and that we are being governed by a secret junta. I suppose we can guess some of the names.

    Besides the Middle East, there is also the real danger of a major war on the Korean peninsula. Both Russia and China are urging restraint. One remembers that in the first Korean War both Russia and China participated on the side of the Norks. The MIG 15's were provided by Russia and flown by Russian pilots. The Chinese provided the infantry. They won; we lost.

    Haven’t we been ruled by a “secret junta” for over 160 years? The possibility of war on the Korean peninsula depends on only if the secret junta wants it, not what some North Korean leader wants or does.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @WorkingClass

    The good news is the US is close to bankruptcy so this really can’t go on for much longer.....
     
    Agreed. The final exhaustion and collapse of Imperial Washington is at hand. Time is on the side of the resistance. Unless the psyco killers in possession of the American war machine opt for nuclear winter.

    And the problem with this is that “pundits” have been predicting this for over 40 years. If the entrenched financial system of debt/usury can continue to find things to waste money on (like war) and as long as Western consumers can still purchase goods and services, the de facto rulers can stretch this out a little while longer. What is a little while? The implication of claiming something is close to happening or “exhaustion and collapse of Imperial Washington is at hand” is that it will happen very shortly. If it doesn’t happen within a year or two, you will appear to be a tin foil hat wearer. When someone actually claims that the collapse will occur within a certain year and it does, I will consider that this person knows what they are talking about.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In my last article, “Scrabble Spells Doom for the Racial Hypothesis of Intelligence,” I argued that Africans should not be able to come anywhere near dominating the games of Scrabble (both English and French) or professional checkers, as they apparently do, if their real biological intelligence was anywhere near as low as their nominal IQ...
  • “No there such thing ”genetic nature of IQ”

    “IQ is a thing, literally, a two or three digit numbers.”

    Again, your verbal abilities reflect low IQ. IQ means Intelligence Quotient. This is a result of the relationship between genetic factors. What you actually mean when you use the term IQ is “IQ test”. An IQ test is not the same as the thing it measures. If IQ tests measure spatial ability (visualizing shapes and figures), mathematical ability (using logic to solve problems), language ability (solving word puzzles or recognizing words with jumbled letters etc.), and memory (recalling visual or aural information), the resulting quotient will have a “genetic basis” reflecting the level of existing intellectual capabilities. The IQ test (the results – aren’t all tests about results?) measures things with a “genetic basis”. Your need to split hairs about this repeatedly is indicative of an insecure, neurotic individual. Maybe that’s what your link indicated?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Santoculto

    Again, your verbal abilities reflect low IQ.
     
    90% of your try of argumentation is IQistic, i think it's you who ''have'' lower IQ.

    I have exceptional verbal abstraction skills. Please, stop to write shit and REFUTE EVERY POINT if you want.

    A classical ''white-tard nationalist'', i imagine....


    IQ means Intelligence Quotient.
     
    oh my...

    This is a result of the relationship between genetic factors.
     
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-dbtLNG-6pFQ/VZafyVklWZI/AAAAAAAARH4/OBStDP-bwoE/s1600/dilma%2Bengra%25C3%25A7ada.jpg

    This sentence...

    oh my...

    IQ as well any test is a abstractization of organic thing.

    What is literal, physical, AS WELL a behavior, is reduced to the abstract symbols.


    What you actually mean when you use the term IQ is “IQ test”. An IQ test is not the same as the thing it measures.
     
    ooooh

    If IQ tests measure spatial ability (visualizing shapes and figures)
     
    an

    mathematical ability (using logic to solve problems)
     
    an

    language ability (solving word puzzles or recognizing words with jumbled letters etc.)
     
    an

    and memory (recalling visual or aural information)
     
    an

    the resulting quotient will have a “genetic basis” reflecting the level of existing intellectual abilities.
     
    an.. diagnosis: you don't understand nothing what i said, maybe my english is just terrible, maybe you have very lower verbal abstract skills... it's likely.

    You're just repeating the same known things everyone in this area know, it's not a REFUTATION, it's not just repetitive monologue.

    REFUTE point by point, if not, i will not answer more your comments.


    The IQ test (the results – aren’t all tests about results?) measures things with a “genetic basis”.
     
    things with a genetic basis, IQ is a vehicle, is a mean to reach a goal and goal is intelligence.

    I agree is need organize, hierarchize, summarize, create a way to identify easily, unify a plethora of organic things in such two a three single numbers.

    BUT, IQ is not intelligence, and when we want know the nature of what IQ express, what's matter = intelligence, so it's good avoid use this type of narrative ''search for genetic nature of IQ''... or not.

    in other and summarized words, stop to be IQist and learn the borders between IQ [the mean] and intelligence[ the goal, the end].

    , @Santoculto

    Your need to split hairs about this repeatedly is indicative of an insecure, neurotic individual. Maybe that’s what your link indicated?
     
    I'm insecure, maybe it's reflects in my intellectual humility...

    MY LORD, you do everything fine isn't**

    You give higher self-esteem to their.... moronic sons...

    I will expect little more when you start to REFUTE point by point my comment and not show me what you know about IQ.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • So the President formerly known as Hitler has apparently pulled his head out of his ass and gotten with the global capitalist program. The ruling classes couldn’t be more relieved, as it was beginning to look like they were going to have to carry on with their totally ridiculous “Manchurian President” propaganda indefinitely, or deal...
  • “and, no, I’m not referring to “the Jews,” I’m referring to the global capitalist establishment”

    Which are, interestingly enough, disproportionately jewish.

    “(and with Cohn and the usual Goldman Sachs guys making sure he doesn’t go nuts and start screwing around with their ongoing efforts to transform the planet into one big happy, neo-feudalist theme park prison)”

    Oh, I guess he is referring to “the jews”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    Even though I'm still not much of a capitalist, this is precisely why I abandoned the left. I just couldn't go through life policing my own thoughts in such a fashion. However hard I tried, I could just never quite manage to 'unsee' all those 'coincidences', such as how banking, foreign policy and the MSM are now almost completely Jew-dominated. I could never unsee how one tiny little country in the middle east--with a higher per capita income than our own!--was able to lay claim to the majority of our foreign aid (plus countless wars and Security Council vetoes) year after year after year. I just couldn't unsee how we're building monuments to the Holocaust in our own capital, even though our country had absolutely to do with it! In fact, we were at war with the very country that was. But we're supposed to feel guilty over something we never did.

    My own red-pill moment came about 15 years ago, when I noticed that all the neocons behind Bush were about 90% Jewish. That was far too high a percentage to be random. And once I started reading up on them, I was astonished at how closely they resembled the early Russian bolsheviks in their methods and worldview. I finally came to the conclusion that the Jew-mafia doesn't really care whether a system is capitalist or communist, so long as their little Jew-mafia controls it.

    Do I hate all Jews? No, of course. For example, I have immense respect for Mr. Unz because of his work through the years, culminating in the founding of this very--and very excellent--website. It may well be that the truly dangerous Jews are actually small in number; unfortunately though, it seems that they all too well how to push the buttons of most of the other Jews so as enforce the tribal mentality. Witness how they behaved during the Trump campaign (and yes, I am now over him, too): rage, desperation, hysteria! You would've thought Trump was a brownshirt or a cossack on horseback! Instead, he turned out to be just another bankster-controlled zionist.

    I have come to the conclusion that this Jew-mafia--along with their new-world-order goy allies, such as the Rockefellers--are the greatest menace our world now knows.
    , @nsa
    Cowardly brainwashed Hopkins tiptoes around the jooies.......the only group that cannot be depicted accurately in public. A caveat has to be added..... "some of my best friends and mentors are jooies (Linh Dinh)", "not all jooies are neocon Izzy firsters", "Unz is a good guy", etc etc. We have a first amendment here....unlike the subservient canadian colony and the hopeless euroweanies who actually prosecute "hate speech". The jooies run Trumpstein, run the media, run the banking system, run the entertainment industries......and deserve all the hatred heaped on them and then some.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In my last article, “Scrabble Spells Doom for the Racial Hypothesis of Intelligence,” I argued that Africans should not be able to come anywhere near dominating the games of Scrabble (both English and French) or professional checkers, as they apparently do, if their real biological intelligence was anywhere near as low as their nominal IQ...
  • @Santoculto
    Genetic nature of...

    a) intelligence

    b) genetics

    c) IQ

    d) nature

    IQists will answer: IQ


    http://tribzap2it.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/tumblr_n1udg2qzmz1r5zq6ao2_250.gif?w=1100

    I think your low IQ on verbal ability is showing through. Perhaps you meant to provide a brilliant riposte, but you failed. Do you consider me an IQist? If so, I can tell you that all of the above have a genetic basis.

    http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/07/neurotic-people-see-faces-in-things.html

    Does this link tell us you are neurotic?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Santoculto
    I think your incapacity to detect implicit information and verbal abstractions make you fool yourself here and there, and there and here...

    Maybe i think i'm one of many people here who you already call ''low IQ'' [lol IQ]

    IQ is a thing, literally, a two or three digit numbers.

    IQ EXPRESS a non-inanimate thing, ''our'' intelligence...

    No there such thing ''genetic nature of IQ''

    There is such organic thing GENETIC NATURE OF INTELLIGENCE

    I doubt you're geneticist to talk about ''genetic nature of'' with substance, you just repeat what other people says as a parrot, and i still think you can't visualize what genetic nature of INTELLIGENCE really is or mean.

    IQ is equivalent to weight size, in numbers.

    IQ is a abstract/numerical representation of something is trully what ''we'' can call a organic thing.

    I consider you a stupid and often it's also mean ''IQist''

    I'm writing in my non-mother tongue, whatever, what's matter is factual understanding, you fail to develop and intellectual humility [to find your own mistakes to improve your understanding].

    Neurotic people, i don't how common is, but i believe it's common among very neurotic people, tend to see faces in objects as well IQists tend to see genes where no there.

    Confuse what is a abstraction and what is a real thing.

    Intelligence [and creativity, and rationality] is:

    organic correlates: brain size, number of neurons and synapses, levels of conectivity between hemispheres, etc...

    ''We'' only can understand or conceptualize intelligence via its expression or behavior.

    So intelligence is:

    - capacity to adapt [namely during the challenging/changing environment]
    - creativity
    - reasoning
    -SELF KNOWLEDGE [one of the most underrated}
    - rationality
    - behavioral rationality
    - cognitive rationality

    Firstly must be needed associate behavior/expression with neurobiological correlates and start from here to search for correlated genes.

    One of the fundamental symptoms of IQism is

    all the time change the word intelligence by the ''word'' IQ as if both were synonimous...

    what you do all the time, PERIOD.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @CanSpeccy

    Even then, if it shows IQ to be a majority of genetic influences... it will be swept under the rug. Don’t want those that are predetermined to low intelligence to have their feelings hurt, do we?
     
    Why would IQ not have a strong genetic component? No one disputes that IQ tests measure verbal and numerical reasoning abilities, and there is surely evidence available already to show that such abilities have a large genetic component.

    The question you ignore is whether IQ measures anything other than verbal and numerical reasoning. As noted above, the brain is modular, that means (for the benefit of Santoculto) that different brain functions are performed by different parts of the brain. Therefore there is no obvious reason to suppose that IQ is correlated with forms of intelligence that IQ tests do not measure. Maybe your pathfinding bump, like that of an Australian aboriginal is enlarged and exceptionally effective, despite the fact you can hardly add up.

    This is the crux of the argument. Just because you have brilliant clerical skills, does that make you a potential Einstein? The IQists seem reluctant to address this question, speaking vaguely about statistical constructs and the mysterious g, even resorting when pushed to the suggestion that those who question their hypothesis must have a low IQ .

    Szopen states:


    It is necessarily true that people with high IQ scores are good at doing IQ tests and vice versa. That much is tautologous so it tells us nothing,
     
    which is like saying math tells us nothing because all mathematical arguments are tautologies. But of course IQ tests tell us something, as do mathematical proofs. They tell us about a person's verbal reasoning and elementary math skills. These are important qualifications for work in government service, middle management, teaching, and many other professions beside.

    What Szopen cannot explain and thus refuses to take questions on is why anyone should assume that verbal reasoning and numerical skill beyond a certain level are prerequisite to producing, original art work, music, scientific theories, or persuading a girl to remove that last item of clothing, or a crowd to vote for this party rather than that. These are all adaptive skills of vital importance. But there seems no reason to suppose that IQ has much if anything to do with any of them. Indeed, the fact that supposedly high IQ types are seen as nerdy, indicates a general perception that they are not strongly related.

    First of all, your comment toward me was rather pointless and neither understood my point nor what I believe. But, I will address two of your points.

    “Why would IQ not have a strong genetic component? No one disputes that IQ tests measure verbal and numerical reasoning abilities, and there is surely evidence available already to show that such abilities have a large genetic component.”

    But, this is not what leftist and blank slate proponents admit, is it? They do not want to acknowledge that people are born with completely different abilities, all of which are genetic. Since this leads to the reasonable conclusion that different races have differing abilities, as measured by statistical sampling, they must try to expunge anything that shows that there are differences between the races since that would show that they do not want a reality based model of the Universe.

    “The question you ignore is whether IQ measures anything other than verbal and numerical reasoning.”

    I didn’t even address this, since it had nothing to do with my comment. However, whatever it does measure correlates well with certain outcomes, such as success in life or with creative productivity. An IQ test is an index of general ability to solve problems and understand concepts. IQ and intelligence are synonymous but not analogous. High IQ is not the whole and sole formula for success. There is much more to success than IQ.

    Even the innocuous paragraph above is taboo for the scientific community to agree with publicly. Why? Because IQ tests can be statistically tabulated and have shown that different races have different mean IQ scores. This is anathema to the left. To admit this would force them to acknowledge that all races are not interchangeable. And since that is a lie they have pushed for almost a century now, it would require them to admit that their policies were not in everyone’s best interests. But, because they have presented themselves as the supreme arbitrators of morality, they could never admit this. This is not science. Science is dispassionate about the results it obtains. If they were wrong about this, they could be wrong about say, climate change. And leftist arguments tend to lean toward, “Science has proven my position!” “Oh, really? How has it been proven?” “You obviously are a hater. Everybody knows its true”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    But, this is not what leftist and blank slate proponents admit, is it? They do not want to acknowledge that people are born with completely different abilities, all of which are genetic. Since this leads to the reasonable conclusion that different races have differing abilities, as measured by statistical sampling, they must try to expunge anything that shows that there are differences between the races since that would show that they do not want a reality based model of the Universe.
     
    I'm not a blank slater. But I don't think IQ measures intelligence as intelligence is intelligently defined (see #319).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Santoculto

    Surely you realize driving is not a one dimensional skill?
     
    duh.

    We don’t even have a g factor for driving accounting for most of the variance so you are being even worse than the IQ-ist strawman you keep criticizing.
     
    Refute POINT BY POINT. It's not a real-talk.

    STRAWMAN = RACIST

    it's the dogmatic word IQists love to use when they no have a good argument.

    Is there any non-indirect way to measure driving skill?

     

    Irrelevant question because you start from the biased idea that i don't know driving skills is not ''unidimensional''.

    “STRAWMAN = RACIST

    it’s the dogmatic word IQists love to use when they no have a good argument.”

    I’m still waiting for a good argument from you. “Racist” is not one. You’re getting upset about this. I find that people that get upset about the genetic nature of IQ invariably don’t have one, although you’ll probably tell us you do. Of course, no proof.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Santoculto
    Oh dear!!!

    genetic nature of IQ

    What's your IQ*

    ''I’m still waiting for a good argument from you.''

    I think the same about you.

    genetic nature of weight size/number...


    http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/07/neurotic-people-see-faces-in-things.html

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “Will Scrabble Have the Last Word on the IQ Debate?”

    No. The last word on IQ debate will be to determine what intelligence is and map the genome for all areas that effect it. Even then, if it shows IQ to be a majority of genetic influences, as opposed to environmental influences, it will be swept under the rug. Don’t want those that are predetermined to low intelligence to have their feelings hurt, do we?

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Even then, if it shows IQ to be a majority of genetic influences... it will be swept under the rug. Don’t want those that are predetermined to low intelligence to have their feelings hurt, do we?
     
    Why would IQ not have a strong genetic component? No one disputes that IQ tests measure verbal and numerical reasoning abilities, and there is surely evidence available already to show that such abilities have a large genetic component.

    The question you ignore is whether IQ measures anything other than verbal and numerical reasoning. As noted above, the brain is modular, that means (for the benefit of Santoculto) that different brain functions are performed by different parts of the brain. Therefore there is no obvious reason to suppose that IQ is correlated with forms of intelligence that IQ tests do not measure. Maybe your pathfinding bump, like that of an Australian aboriginal is enlarged and exceptionally effective, despite the fact you can hardly add up.

    This is the crux of the argument. Just because you have brilliant clerical skills, does that make you a potential Einstein? The IQists seem reluctant to address this question, speaking vaguely about statistical constructs and the mysterious g, even resorting when pushed to the suggestion that those who question their hypothesis must have a low IQ .

    Szopen states:


    It is necessarily true that people with high IQ scores are good at doing IQ tests and vice versa. That much is tautologous so it tells us nothing,
     
    which is like saying math tells us nothing because all mathematical arguments are tautologies. But of course IQ tests tell us something, as do mathematical proofs. They tell us about a person's verbal reasoning and elementary math skills. These are important qualifications for work in government service, middle management, teaching, and many other professions beside.

    What Szopen cannot explain and thus refuses to take questions on is why anyone should assume that verbal reasoning and numerical skill beyond a certain level are prerequisite to producing, original art work, music, scientific theories, or persuading a girl to remove that last item of clothing, or a crowd to vote for this party rather than that. These are all adaptive skills of vital importance. But there seems no reason to suppose that IQ has much if anything to do with any of them. Indeed, the fact that supposedly high IQ types are seen as nerdy, indicates a general perception that they are not strongly related.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I expect the PRC government has a team of spooks and doctors whose main job is to monitor the Dalai Lama’s public appearances for indications concerning his health. The Dalai Lama’s April 8 visit to Tawang probably gave them something to chew on, because he didn’t look that good to me. He was mentally acute...
  • @DB Cooper
    WikiLeak has revealed the DL has for years been sending orphans under his care to go to war against Pakistan for India. These are underage kids made into child soldiers who do not have choice of not going.

    http://transmissionsmedia.com/the-dark-side-of-dalai-lama/

    https://followersofdorjeshugden.com/wikileaks/

    There are other morally degenerate things too. If you are interested I can tell you more.

    Go for it. But, first I think you should read your links. The first goes to a site that has links about the Dalai Lama’s consent going to another site that is in Spanish. The second really doesn’t have anything that links the Dalai Lama to these actions. It is usually someone else that is quoted, often the DL’s brother. Plus, it is from the CIA. They are notorious for evil.

    Claiming the DL is “morally degenerate” requires a series of acts that are well documented. Others have tried to point out that Nelson Mandela and MLK were “morally degenerate” as well. And there is more convincing proof for them, by the way.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    I'm at the point where I believe that all great men are also terrible men.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “I doubt the successor will carry anywhere near the current Dalai Lama’s prestige and authority.”

    And yet, every time a Pope is elected, he does carry all the previous “Vicars of Christ”‘ prestige and authority, doesn’t he? Organized, structured religious belief is a strong delusion among large populations. I don’t think the Tibetans are any different in this.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    Pop carries all the previous "Vicars of Christ" prestige and authority because he was elected through the due process. The next Dalai Lama can carry previous Dalai Lama' prestige and authority if he is elected through the due process. Mind you the due process of electing a Dalai Lama has to be approved and supervised by the Beijing authority as well as the elected candidate has be blessed by the Beijing authority in order to become a Dala Lama, this due process is hundreds years old ritual and as sacred as Jesus and Cross.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @DB Cooper
    Typical nonsense response. What does this have to do with Mao? Can they be both bad in a different way? Don't try to distract the issue.

    Well, how is he “morally degenerate”? Declaring an opinion is not the same as truth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @DB Cooper
    WikiLeak has revealed the DL has for years been sending orphans under his care to go to war against Pakistan for India. These are underage kids made into child soldiers who do not have choice of not going.

    http://transmissionsmedia.com/the-dark-side-of-dalai-lama/

    https://followersofdorjeshugden.com/wikileaks/

    There are other morally degenerate things too. If you are interested I can tell you more.
    , @Alden
    He means Tibetan diaspora young men are encouraged to join the Indian army at 17 or 18, the same minimum ages for enlistment in every army in the world including ours. US 17 year olds can sign up but must wait until their 18th birthday to actually enter the military.

    England accepts 16 year olds in the army.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There are the terrorists, who get attention out of all proportion to their actual clout, and then there are those with big-time clout -- I think of them as the terrarists -- who get almost no attention at all. Back in May 2013, I came up with that term and here’s how I described those...
  • This is just an example of defining the narrative. “Climate change” is undeniable. The climate changes from week to week, season to season, century to century. Has for as long as there has been a planet. Sometimes it is warmer, sometimes cooler. It has as much to do with the variable amounts of radiation coming from the Sun as anything else. What is BS, though, is “Man-Made” Climate change. Declaring that man has the capability to destroy this planet by his actions is just another variation of Humanism. Man is God. He can create or destroy things. It is proof of his “divinity” that he can destroy his planet and, as a result, destroy himself.

    If you talk to a believer in the Church of Climatology (TM), they will tell you all the proof, based on different “models”, as to why mankind is destroying the planet with his selfish actions. When you point out that it is not climate change which you deny but man-made climate change, you will see them calm down a bit. A bit. But, they will continue using the term climate change, rather than man-made climate change. Climate change let’s them play God. Man-made climate change forces them to acknowledge reality, which is why they avoid arguing against it and try to make the two synonymous.

    A fun type of the Church of Climatology (TM) zealot is the believer in Gaia. They assign a life and personality to the Earth itself. I usually mess with them by pointing out that if man ever really did threaten this entity, it would just shrug its shoulders and stop us. We are no more than insects to it. It has nothing to fear from us. This really screws with their minds. Try it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • What if our belief in self-government is a belief in a myth? What if the election of one political party over the other to control Congress changes only appearances? What if taxes stay high and regulations stay pervasive and the government stays oppressive and presidents fight wars no matter what the politicians promise and no...
  • Just remove the “what if” everywhere in this article and it will be accurate. There is no longer any doubt about it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • From Fox26:
  • @unpc downunder
    I think Steve's main point it that the MSM is so fixated on making up man bites dogs stories for ideological reasons, it can't even spot a literal man bites dog story.

    William Randolph Hearst must be rolling in his grave.

    Why would William Randolph Hearst be rolling in his grave? Wasn’t he responsible for massive amounts of fake news? Hey, if it helps sell the rag and influence outcomes, how can it be bad?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “If China is not going to solve North Korea, we will.” So thundered President Donald Trump last week. Unfortunately, neither China nor North Korea appeared intimidated by this presidential bombast or Trump’s Tweets. What would ‘we will’ actually entail? This clear threat makes us think seriously about what a second Korean War would be like....
  • “If there were ever a Just Cause for the Yanks to invade and bring democracy somewhere,”

    There never was and never will be. Democracy is not some magic panacea that will cure everyone everywhere. If you’ve paid attention over the last 3 decades you would know this. And the fact that you somehow justified draining the life out of your own country to accomplish these laughable military and ideological goals is really sad.

    Congratulations to all the arm chair generals here. I heard pretty much every talking point on this topic in this thread. As if any of you know anything.

    Read More
    • Replies: @basedKRN

    “If there were ever a Just Cause for the Yanks to invade and bring democracy somewhere,”

    There never was and never will be. Democracy is not some magic panacea that will cure everyone everywhere. If you’ve paid attention over the last 3 decades you would know this. And the fact that you somehow justified draining the life out of your own country to accomplish these laughable military and ideological goals is really sad.

    Congratulations to all the arm chair generals here. I heard pretty much every talking point on this topic in this thread. As if any of you know anything.
     
    Thank you, sir. I'm glad there are people who see this. Even if Yanks have noble intent, it seems along the way they have caused way too much destruction and brought about the resentment of the world. Even so, it seems a lot of (((neoconservatives))) have been the ones responsible for bringing "democracy" to the world, and it hasn't been all roses and chocolates for those involved.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.