The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndre Vltchek Archive
Mostafa Afzalzadeh Interviews Andre Vltchek for Farhikhtegan
Is it the US that has weakened or have countries that resist become stronger?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Q: Do we see an increase in the number of countries resisting the bullying of the United States and its allies? What makes this resistance happen?

A: I believe that there are two main factors. The first one is the ‘moral one’: People are more and more aware of the brutality of the Western colonialism, neo-colonialism and imperialism, which have been torturing the planet for many centuries. This awareness became possible mainly thanks to the non-Western mass media outlets, such as RT, Telesur, Press TV, CGTN, but also NEO, Global Times and Sputnik. The second one is the “practical aspect”: Countries like Iran, Venezuela, or Cuba are looking around, and what they see are horrors that are happening to neighboring nations, which have already succumbed to the Western dictate: Iraq, Afghanistan, Honduras, for instance. They see total devastation and collapse, and they are coming to a logical conclusion: “Being a slave of the Western empire does not pay. It is better to maintain dignity and to fight for independence, no matter what. Dying upright is better than surviving on one’s knees, in a puddle of excrement.”

Q: Is it the US that has weakened or countries that resist have become stronger?

A: Both. The U.S. is weak because it is morally defunct. There is nothing optimistic in terrorizing other nations. To run an imperialist empire is deeply nihilistic and gloomy. To live from plunder is depressing. Depression and pessimism, nihilism and constant outbursts of aggressiveness, are weakening the spirit. On the other hand, positive resistance and revolutionary spirit, are strengthening both nations and the individuals. I described it in detail in my revolutionary philosophy book, “Revolutionary Optimism, Western Nihilism.”

Q: What happens to a country that does not resist the oppression of powerful countries? What makes countries surrender to the West and not believe in their own power?

A: Total collapse. It happened, for instance, to Indonesia, after the US-sponsored coup of 1965. It is, unfortunately, going to happen to Brazil, under the Bolsonaro regime, unless the country rises. It happened to Russia under Yeltsin. Countries surrender to the West because they lower their guard and their young people get fully indoctrinated by Western propaganda, as we can see, right now, in Hong Kong. Of course, local elites often play a very negative role: they get corrupted by the West, and they use their power over their own people, using the mass media outlets that they hold in their hands, as a tool of indoctrination and of the lowering of the intellectual standards of their nation. Education, too, can be a double-edge sword: ‘education’ does not always mean positive ‘knowledge’ – it can be something that brutally forces a person into accepting orthodox, banal concepts which ruin all creativity and make people accept a way of thinking that is injected into their country from abroad (the West). Excessive amounts of nihilist, pop ‘culture’ designed to negatively condition one’s brain, is there to weaken the country as a whole.

Q: Are the US and Britain as influential as they seem, or are they less powerful than the will of nations, in portraying themselves with the help of soft power?

A: Both the United States and Britain, but especially the United States, are extremely powerful and lethal, militarily. Together, they possess enough nuclear weapons, to destroy life on our planet, many times, over and over again. However, as societies, they are becoming increasingly weak. If you mingle with North American and British people, one thing that would strike you, is that most of the individuals living there are very confused, insecure and uncertain about countless basic things. There is a lot of fear there. People are scared of getting sick or old. They are terrified of ending up without a job, on the street. Many are incredibly lonely. But their brains have been conditioned, geared to embrace extreme individualism, and so, they are increasingly afraid to commit to anything or anybody. They are desperately longing to be part of a family, of a community, or of some movement, but they cannot commit to anything. If you are committed, let’s say you are a Communist or something else, they will ridicule you, smear you. It is quite an ugly world populated by mainly weak, spoilt people, who talk big, smear big, try to think about themselves as being big, but are terribly insecure and unhappy, often suicidal. They think they are free, but they are not. They think they are knowledgeable, but many of them are like ISIS; totally indoctrinated.

Q: To what extent has the Iranian people’s resistance and in the whole, the resistance of what is called axis of resistance (Syria, Iraq, Yemen …) been a model for the world’s dominated countries? How can the countries that have resisted, transfer their experiences to other countries?


A: Only through determined men and women – writers, journalists and filmmakers. The problem is that in the West, almost no one knows about the heroic struggle of the Iranian, Syrian, Venezuelan or Cuban people, and very few are really aware of the suffering of the Yemeni men, women and children. And the West basically controls the flow of information in places like Africa, Asia (except China) and to a great extent – Latin America. And this is precisely where we have to get people to know what is happening in the world. Cubans should now be close to Iranians, Syrians to Venezuelans. To the Russians and Chinese, with all those who are being attacked by the West. In a way, this is now beginning to happen, but slowly. Victims should unite, and fight. To survive together, to defeat imperialism, together, and to build much a better world, together. The resistance of heroic countries should be hailed. Imperialism should be shamed, stridently. We should help each other, support each other. The trend is in the right direction. I just wish things would move faster. I don’t want billions of human beings to continue dying in misery, unnecessarily, as they are now: alive but dead. I believe in justice, in social justice. That is why I support countries that are fighting against imperialism. I don’t expect them to be perfect. I only expect them to be better than those who are torturing the world. Better, stronger and kinder.


Andre Vltchek is a philosopher, novelist, filmmaker and investigative journalist. He has covered wars and conflicts in dozens of countries. Four of his latest books are Revolutionary Optimism, Western Nihilism, a revolutionary novel “Aurora” and a bestselling work of political non-fiction: “Exposing Lies Of The Empire”. View his other books here. Watch Rwanda Gambit, his groundbreaking documentary about Rwanda and DRCongo and his film/dialogue with Noam Chomsky “On Western Terrorism”. Vltchek presently resides in East Asia and the Middle East, and continues to work around the world. He can be reached through his website and his Twitter. His Patreon

Mostafa Afzalzadeh is an Iranian journalist and film maker

• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: American Military, Iran, Middle East 
Hide 2 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Hossein says:

    The mulla’s spread of sectarianism has proven to be as toxic as imperial interventions by western world powers.
    The results of such sectarianism can be witnessed by paying attention to the recent uprising of Iraqi patriots who want to rid their country of agents and mercenaries of Persian expansionism and western Imperialism.

    Mustafa fails to mention the fact that the Mullas were the ones who aided and abetted the Imperial powers in destroying Iraq. The actions of the Persian Rasputins, Sistani and Sadr,both Persian agents, and their relationship and collusion against people of Iraq speaks volume of similarities between Persian Neo Imperialism and western powers.

    Persian imperialist Mullas are as much of a danger to the well being of Iraq as the western imperialist powers and therefore the Iraqi people are absolutely right in demanding that their country be saved from those forces.

  2. Mostafa Afzalzadeh Interviews Andre Vltchek for Farhikhtegan

    Oops, sorry, my cat jumped on the keyboard.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andre Vltchek Comments via RSS