The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Paul Kersey Archive
With NAACP Speech, Hillary Goes Full “Black Lives Matter, White Lives Don’t”
—And Her Convention Will Be Worse (Better)
naacphillary
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Only a day after another black radical—this time a member of the Nation of Islam—opened fire on white police in Baton Rouge (killing two white officers and one black officer, injuring multiple other white officers), the presumptive nominee for the Democrat Party has doubled down on the idea that racist white police are still out there hunting innocent black people.

Honestly, it’s hard to even keep a straight-face when reading what Hillary Clinton just told the NAACP National Convention in Cincinnati: that she will personally not stop leading a crusade against police “until we root out implicit bias and stop the killings of African Americans.”

She continued:

As president, l will bring the full weight of the law to bear and making sure those who kill police officers are brought to justice…And let’s admit it, there is clear evidence that African-Americans are disproportionately killed in police incidents compared to any other group. And African-American men are far more likely to be stopped and searched by police, charged with crimes and sentenced to longer prison terms than white men convicted of the same offenses. These facts tell us something is profoundly wrong. We can’t ignore that, we can’t wish it away.

[Hillary Clinton Decries Police Killings, Officer-Involved Shootings at NAACP Annual Conference, ABC News, by Liz Kreutz, July 18, 2016]

Eight police officers, seven white, have been assassinated in less than two weeks–and Clinton is inflaming the black community’s collective fantasy that there is a racial jihad by white police on “black bodies. “

Of course, the Lying Press, along with assorted NBA athletes [LeBron James on social activism: ‘We all have to do better’, ESPN, July 14, 2016] is piling on. Thus, incredibly, the white editor of the Memphis Commercial-Appeal [email him] just emitted an editorial addressed to the 65 percent black residents of the city, basically begging for forgiveness for daring to have a headline (Gunman Targeted Whites) reporting the simple truth that white police officers were the intended victims in Dallas. [CA Editor: We got it wrong., by Louis Graham, Memphis Commercial Appeal, July 13, 2016]

All of the black violence against white police (Witness heard Bristol gunman yelling, ‘Police suck! Black lives matter!’ as he opened fire, WTVR.com, July 8, 2016) comes at a time when President Obama persists in lecturing the very people being targeted for assassination by “black bodies” that the “if police organizations and departments acknowledge that there’s a problem (with white police racism/implicit bias against blacks) and there’s an issue, then that, too, is going to contribute to real solutions” [Obama: Police Can ‘Make the Job of Being a Cop a Lot Safer’ by Admitting Their Failures, MRC TV, by Craig Bannister, July 11, 2016]

The plain but still-amazing fact is that that this Black Lives Matter-inspired nationwide violence against white police officers has the tacit approval of the White House. Consider how Obama met with the self-proclaimed leaders of this decentralized movement (for three hours!!) only days after the Dallas attack and days before the Baton Rouge assault [DeRay Mckesson Meets With Obama At Black Lives Matter Meeting At White House, IBITimes.com, Cristina Silva, July 13, 2016]

So you have to ask yourself: will all of this black violence against police cool down?

Will some voice of sanity arise, convincing black people that, no, white police officers aren’t hunting “black bodies” and intentionally targeting them execution (that, indeed, the opposite is the truth)? [Surprising New Evidence Shows Bias in Police Use of Force but Not in Shootings, New York Times, by Quoctrung Bui and Amanda Cox, July 11, 2016]

The answer is a resounding “no.” Hillary Clinton has just gone all-in on the claim that white cops are hunting “black bodies” as the winning hand in defeating Donald J. Trump.

Seriously.

This is what her campaign will be defined upon. An entire day at the Democrat Convention next week in Philadelphia is being dedicated to allowing black mothers of would-be cop killers the chance to address the nation on behalf of their dead black sons:

Tuesday: A Lifetime Of Fighting For Children And Families

Featuring President Bill Clinton and Mothers of the Movement

Gavel time expected at 4:00 p.m.

Tuesday will feature the roll call vote and how Hillary Clinton has spent her entire career working to make a difference for children, families and our country. The Mothers of the Movement participating include Gwen Carr, mother of Eric Garner; Sybrina Fulton, mother of Trayvon Martin; Maria Hamilton, mother of Dontré Hamilton; Lucia McBath, mother of Jordan Davis; Lezley McSpadden, mother of Michael Brown; Cleopatra Pendleton-Cowley, mother of Hadiya Pendleton; Geneva Reed-Veal, mother of Sandra Bland.

[What To Expect At The Democratic Convention, NPR, by Daniel Kurtzleben, July 15, 2016]

Lezley McSpadden was famously last seen fighting with other family members over who had the right to sell merchandise in the name of her son, the “gentle giant” of Ferguson. See James Fulford’s The Mothers of the Movement–Hillary And The DNC Go All In For Dead Thugs for more detail.

All of this should be enough for Americans to forever tune out the insanity of what I’ve dubbed Black-Run America (BRA)—or what VDARE.com has succinctly called the Minority-Occupation Government—if it were not for Hollywood also going all-in, with what amounts to basically a celebration of black mass murderer Nat Turner:

natturnerThe latest poster for Nate Parker’s Birth of a Nation continues the theme of powerful historical images for the movie’s marketing campaign.

The one-sheet, which debuted on Tidal, shows Parker’s character, Nat Turner, being hanged by a noose made out of the American flag.

[New ‘Birth of a Nation’ Poster Shows Nate Parker in American Flag Noose, by Mia Gallupo, Hollywood Reporter, July 15, 2016. Links in original].

Donald J. Trump has stated unequivocally that he stands for “law and order.”

Folks: The Democrats, Hillary, Obama, the Main Stream Media, and those pulling the levers of power of BRA/Minority-Occupied Government are not playing poker anymore with Black Lives Matter–they are playing Russian Roulette.

The good news: This lunacy might just provide the event that forever frees the Historic American Nation from the seemingly eternal chains of white guilt.

And what’s more all we have to do is get out of the way and let our enemies pull the trigger.

Paul Kersey[Email him] is the author of the blog SBPDL, and has published the books SBPDL Year One, Hollywood in Blackface and Escape From Detroit, Opiate of America: College Football in Black and White and Second City Confidential: The Black Experience in Chicagoland. His latest book is The Tragic City: Birmingham 1963-2 013.

(Reprinted from VDare.com by permission of author or representative)
 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
    []
  1. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Cops should just go easy on black crime.

    Cops did all the dirty work to save cities so that affluent Libs can have their gentropolis.
    They were ordered to get tough on Negroes.
    But now, the Libs are acting like they are totally innocent and it’s all cops’ fault.

    Also, blacks never thank cops for saving blacks from… other blacks.

    So, cops should just let blacks kill blacks and let black burn down big Liberal cities and attack Libs.

    Who the hell cares?

    LET BLACKS KILL BLACKS AND WHITE/JEWISH/YELLOW/HOMO LIBERALS.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    Nothing is more certainly written in the book of Fate than
    that these people are to be free; nor is it less certain
    that the two races equally free cannot live under the same
    government.
     

    "The difference of race is one of the reasons why I fear war may always exist; because race implies difference, difference implies superiority, and superiority leads to predominance."

    "Progress and reaction are but words to mystify the millions. They mean nothing, they are nothing, they are phrases and not facts. All is race. In the structure, the decay, and the development of the various families of man, the vicissitudes of history find their main solution."
     
    Jefferson and, much more so, Jewish supremacist Disraeli may have been dislikeable.
    What too many aren't aware of is, truth is often, if not always, dislikeable.
    , @Anonymous
    I agree. Cops should stop policing blacks.

    Only deep shock can awake the asleep, and bring them back to reality.
    , @Intelligent Dasein
    I agree. Black on black crime is just negative feedback. But don't think they won't complain about that, too.
    , @Anonymous
    So you're for self inflicted genocide? Even on innocents?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/article/with-naacp-speech-hillary-goes-full-black-lives-matter-white-lives-dont/#comment-1498505
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Priss Factor
    Cops should just go easy on black crime.

    Cops did all the dirty work to save cities so that affluent Libs can have their gentropolis.
    They were ordered to get tough on Negroes.
    But now, the Libs are acting like they are totally innocent and it's all cops' fault.

    Also, blacks never thank cops for saving blacks from... other blacks.

    So, cops should just let blacks kill blacks and let black burn down big Liberal cities and attack Libs.

    Who the hell cares?

    LET BLACKS KILL BLACKS AND WHITE/JEWISH/YELLOW/HOMO LIBERALS.

    Nothing is more certainly written in the book of Fate than
    that these people are to be free; nor is it less certain
    that the two races equally free cannot live under the same
    government.

    “The difference of race is one of the reasons why I fear war may always exist; because race implies difference, difference implies superiority, and superiority leads to predominance.”

    “Progress and reaction are but words to mystify the millions. They mean nothing, they are nothing, they are phrases and not facts. All is race. In the structure, the decay, and the development of the various families of man, the vicissitudes of history find their main solution.”

    Jefferson and, much more so, Jewish supremacist Disraeli may have been dislikeable.
    What too many aren’t aware of is, truth is often, if not always, dislikeable.

    Read More
  3. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Priss Factor
    Cops should just go easy on black crime.

    Cops did all the dirty work to save cities so that affluent Libs can have their gentropolis.
    They were ordered to get tough on Negroes.
    But now, the Libs are acting like they are totally innocent and it's all cops' fault.

    Also, blacks never thank cops for saving blacks from... other blacks.

    So, cops should just let blacks kill blacks and let black burn down big Liberal cities and attack Libs.

    Who the hell cares?

    LET BLACKS KILL BLACKS AND WHITE/JEWISH/YELLOW/HOMO LIBERALS.

    I agree. Cops should stop policing blacks.

    Only deep shock can awake the asleep, and bring them back to reality.

    Read More
    • Replies: @gwynedd1
    Its already being happening. Chicago is already up 100 homicides from last year.
  4. @Priss Factor
    Cops should just go easy on black crime.

    Cops did all the dirty work to save cities so that affluent Libs can have their gentropolis.
    They were ordered to get tough on Negroes.
    But now, the Libs are acting like they are totally innocent and it's all cops' fault.

    Also, blacks never thank cops for saving blacks from... other blacks.

    So, cops should just let blacks kill blacks and let black burn down big Liberal cities and attack Libs.

    Who the hell cares?

    LET BLACKS KILL BLACKS AND WHITE/JEWISH/YELLOW/HOMO LIBERALS.

    I agree. Black on black crime is just negative feedback. But don’t think they won’t complain about that, too.

    Read More
  5. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    http://gothamist.com/2016/07/19/yale_slavery_window_smasher.php

    Social Justice Vandalism like during the Cultural Revolution.

    A dumb nation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @tbraton
    "Social Justice Vandalism like during the Cultural Revolution. "

    Interesting observation. Over the last couple of years, I have made a few references to the "Cultural Revolution" experienced by China in the late 60's/early 70's and likened it to what was going on in the U.S. and got no responses. I haven't been able to track down my TAC comments yet, but this is what I posted in response to a National Review article about "a year ago":

    "tbraton • a year ago
    Maybe I missed it, but I have seen no reference drawing a comparison between the current travails on campus and in our society as a whole (the PC position on SSM, "campus rape," man-made global warming (oops, make that "man-made climate change"), and you name it) with the trauma that consumed Communist China starting back in the mid-60's known as the "Cultural Revolution." I'm guessing that many Chinese intellectuals who lived through that trying period must be shaking their heads in wonderment and bemusement when they read about the current antics going on in the U.S. They must be thinking (in Chinese, of course) "been there, done that, better you than me." "

    BTW, it has nothing to do with the subject of this comment, but, in searching for my comments on TAC, I happened to run across this comment of mine dealing with the Libyan War five years ago, which made me laugh (although it is bad form, I often laugh at my own material):

    "tbraton says:
    March 20, 2011 at 4:55 pm
    “Odyssey Dawn in this regard by Day 2 already an obvious scam; Washington now buttoning up for incoming blowback.
    By the way, do you suppose the Classics scholar who was privileged to name this fiasco was slipping one over on his bosses or is just himself a dumb son-of-a bitch.”

    Classics? I think you are missing the point. Odyssey is a well-known minivan made by Honda. Dawn is a leading dish detergent made by Proctor and Gamble. Think marketing. They are trying to sell us a really bad product. I’m surprised they didn’t call the operation Edsel Classic Coke, but then the American public might have caught on."
  6. How revealing. Hildabeast and those like her live nowhere close to blacks.

    Put Section 8 housing in their neighborhoods and they would become Republicans.

    A must read:

    ‘Analysis of Washington Post police-shootings data reveals surprising result – nearly 2x more whites than blacks shot by police’

    - even though whites commit much, much less crimes

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/07/18/analysis-of-washington-post-police-shootings-data-reveals-surprising-result/

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish
    The results are only surprising to the lying LSM presstitutes because they haven't bothered to check the facts before spreading their lies.
  7. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    If the 1965 Immigration Reform Act had not been passed, and if a National Origins Immigration Policy had been passed that excluded all nonwhite Legal Immigrants, Hillary Clinton would not have a massive Democratic Party Voting Bloc in 2016….And Native Born White Americans would still be a 90 percent racial majority in the US in 2016. Hillary Clinton would not have a snowballs-chance-in-hell of ever being elected POTUS on Nov 8 2016.

    After the Democratic Party Convention, Native Born White American Males will be murdered in Cold Blood all over the US. The White Cops were for practice.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stonehands
    White women chemically neuter themselves with birth prevention pills -or have abortions. The more they are educated, the more neurotic they become. How can the U.S. remain 90 per cent white, if NO white western nation replenishes its demographic?
  8. Honestly, it’s hard to even keep a straight-face when reading what Hillary Clinton just told…

    Honestly, it’s hard to even keep a straight-face when considering that Hillary Clinton is a serious candidate. Instead, it belongs in a pen.

    Read More
  9. WOW, wow …. Here goes another crying White Christian bigot….

    NAACP was founded and still funded by Zionist Jews, who used Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. to fool Black Christian to become supporters of Israel, which is not unusual, as the great majority of White leaders are willing to sell even their mothers to dip into Zionist Jewish pockets.

    Baton Rouge shooter Gavin Eugene Long was a 101% Christian Black according ADL and had nothing to do with ADL’s no.1 enemy, Nation of Islam whose head Louis Farrakhan had called the Organized Jewry, THE SATANIC JEWS. Your story was cooked by the anti-Muslim The Daily Caller website – founded in 2010 by two ZioConservatives, Neil Patel, who served deputy to Jew criminal Libby Scooter and an adviser to Israel-First Dick Cheney – and Tucker Carlson, a Jewish-Poodle at the Fox News.

    A 2015 study conducted by a Washington DC-based Jewish lobby group, ‘New America Foundatio, claimed that twice as many people have died in attacks by White extremists than Muslim extremists since 9/11.

    The ‘study’ is based on 19 terrorist acts committed by White supremacists, and 7 by Muslim extremists during that period of time.

    The 7 terrorist acts for which the ‘study’ blamed Muslims have proven to be false flag operations carried out by Israeli Mossad with the help of local intelligence and law enforcement agencies. For example, the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing which killed four people had Mossad fingerprints all over. The Fort Hood shooting which killed 13 people, and was blamed on US Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was also a false flag operation to demonize American Muslim community……

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/06/26/lobby-white-folks-are-greatest-threat-to-us/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Greasy William

    NAACP was founded and still funded by Zionist Jews
     
    Enough with the Jews, already! We want to complain about blacks in peace.
  10. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Paul Kersey

    Richard Spencer should have mopped-the-floor up with the Haitian Foriegner Roland Martin who issued the Demographic Threat several times to Richard.

    Here is what Richard Spencer should said to the arrogant Haitin Roland Martin:”The Native Born White American Working Class have had their jobs and wages stolen by the imported nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc…..They didn’t consent to share our jobs and wages with them….The revolt against the Majority nonwhite Democratic Party’s open and deliberate policy of radically changing the racial composition of the US is COMMING….try and stop us Roland Martin”…

    So my question is:Why didn’t Richard Spencer say this on Roland Martin’s CNN show?..

    Read More
  11. @Rehmat
    WOW, wow .... Here goes another crying White Christian bigot....

    NAACP was founded and still funded by Zionist Jews, who used Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. to fool Black Christian to become supporters of Israel, which is not unusual, as the great majority of White leaders are willing to sell even their mothers to dip into Zionist Jewish pockets.

    Baton Rouge shooter Gavin Eugene Long was a 101% Christian Black according ADL and had nothing to do with ADL's no.1 enemy, Nation of Islam whose head Louis Farrakhan had called the Organized Jewry, THE SATANIC JEWS. Your story was cooked by the anti-Muslim The Daily Caller website - founded in 2010 by two ZioConservatives, Neil Patel, who served deputy to Jew criminal Libby Scooter and an adviser to Israel-First Dick Cheney – and Tucker Carlson, a Jewish-Poodle at the Fox News.

    A 2015 study conducted by a Washington DC-based Jewish lobby group, 'New America Foundatio, claimed that twice as many people have died in attacks by White extremists than Muslim extremists since 9/11.

    The ‘study’ is based on 19 terrorist acts committed by White supremacists, and 7 by Muslim extremists during that period of time.

    The 7 terrorist acts for which the ‘study’ blamed Muslims have proven to be false flag operations carried out by Israeli Mossad with the help of local intelligence and law enforcement agencies. For example, the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing which killed four people had Mossad fingerprints all over. The Fort Hood shooting which killed 13 people, and was blamed on US Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was also a false flag operation to demonize American Muslim community......

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/06/26/lobby-white-folks-are-greatest-threat-to-us/

    NAACP was founded and still funded by Zionist Jews

    Enough with the Jews, already! We want to complain about blacks in peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    "Enough with the Jews, already!"

    But darling - they are not finished with anti-Black White racist like you.

    Remembering Solon Blatt .....

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2013/06/04/the-strange-career-of-solomon-blatt/
    , @Eileen Kuch
    Greasy William, Rehmat's comment is quite valid. Black Lives Matter (BLM), the New Black Panthers, etc. are supported by none other than George Soros, a billionaire Jew. Soros has been paying anti-Trump protesters $15/hour to stage protests at Trump rallies, and has done so to stage protests at the RNC in Cleveland.
    Soros was also behind violent protests in a number of cities, paying $15/hour to the participants. Incitement to violence wherein either innocents and/or police are injured and/or killed is a felony. Period.
    , @Junior
    Fucking HILARIOUS line.

    And just to let you know, this is coming from someone that doesn't agree with the sentiment, so you KNOW that it's gotta be funny. Thanks for the laugh :)
  12. The left are trying to form a narrative around this which justifies the formation of a federalized police force. This federal police agency would replace your local police, state patrol, and sheriff’s deputies. Think about that for a moment.

    Read More
    • Replies: @another fred

    The left are trying to form a narrative around this which justifies the formation of a federalized police force.
     
    It's all in place just waiting for the Emergency to be declared, then all LEAs in the US are under Homeland Security, local boundaries vanish.

    All lines of authority are in place, everyone has their orders, all that lacks is the Emergency.

    Give it a decade or so yet.

    , @gwynedd1
    That is exactly what is behind this.
    , @Olorin
    Precisely.
    , @WorkingClass
    Federales coming to el norte. Probably much sooner than you think.
  13. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Paul Kersey

    I personally know White Women who suffered the home break-in-gang-rape terror that the Paul Kersey’s Wife and daughter experienced in the movie Death Wish. One of them who I know a….former waitress….went on to marry the Police Officer who arrived on the scene after the gang rape. They went on to have six Native Born White American Children. It is a mortal sin that White Men continue to watch NFL Negro Ball…

    A few more things that Richard Spencer could have said to the arrogant Haitian Roland Smith:”Blacks have benefited from the wealth generated by slavery just by virtue of being born in the US. The Black Middle Class and the multimillionaire Black Elites…all benefitted greatly…. in the historical-birth-contingency sense that you accuse The Native Born White American Working Class of having benefited from slavery…..Moreover, why should the The Native Born White American Working Class go along with being voted into a violently persecuted racial minority in the US by Hindu…Chinese….Koreans…Nigerians…Haitians…Sihks….Pakistani Muslims?…You can’t give my people a reason for doing this…so don’t be shocked that The Native Born White American Working Class revolts against The Democratic Party’s race-replacement immigration policy.”…”Moreover, The Native Born White American Working Class deserves reparations for having their wages and jobs stolen by the highly racialized nonwhite legal immigrant Democratic Party Voting Bloc and its nonwhite US born geneline”….

    Read More
  14. BLM doesn’t mean “White lives don’t matter”. That is just a weak, defensive derailment by white people who don’t know the slightest thing about ethnic conflict. You sound like the political equivalent of that kid who keeps going “What about meeeeeeee?!” Nobody will be convinced except for the people who already agree with you.

    The right response would be something like, who said black lives didn’t matter? Or, why does a few shootings mean black lives don’t matter? And if the activist insist on exaggerating their victimhood, then a good old fashioned “Fuck you, and fuck your fake grievances” should suffice.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    I agree with you.

    BLM by framing the issue of police brutality as a race issue is not really interested in solving the problem of police brutality which is a real problem affecting both whites and blacks. The rules of engagement practiced by American police need to be changed. Unfortunately this is very unlikely to happen as Americans really accept police brutality and consider it as normal (movies, media, historical American mentality of solving conflicts by violence). The uniquely American phenomenon of suicide by police is a proof that something is really very wrong with police rules of engagement. Robots with primitive AI software could produce the same outcomes. American police behave like occupational foreign force. Some like to compare it to IDF in Gaza citing training by Israel connected security firms. While this might be a factor, the problem of police brutality in America is older than the State of Israel.

    By framing the problem of police brutality as a racial issue assures that the problem will not be solved. BLM was started to stir things up to keep attention away from socioeconomic issues on which people could actually unite. It is a part of divide et impera tactics that always worked and sadly will always work. Having ethnic minority that is economically disadvantaged and criminogenic is really a gift to any ruling class. Slavery is a gift that keeps on giving to new plantation owners. Did the Founding Fathers know what they were doing?
    , @Priss Factor
    -----BLM doesn’t mean “White lives don’t matter”.------

    Considering that most racial violence is black on white and given that blacks are more likely to kill police(often white), BLM is a travesty.

    The movement we need is BLACK THUGGERY KILLS. But blacks act like perennial victims or blactims.

    And then, you got the middle class black angle. Black middle class have it good, but they are envious because other races still do better in prestigious departments in colleges. Blacks mostly major in social sciences or political science.
    So, black middle class is motivated mainly by resentment against their non-black peers(who are generally Liberal and proggy), but since it sounds petty to speak out in envy and resentment, they take up this bogus cause BLM as proxy for their personal and professional frustration.

    But these middle class blacks don't want to deal with ghetto negroes either. If anything, they segregate themselves from bad blacks and prefer to live with non-blacks.
    But that makes them sound like uncle toms. They lose street cred. So, even as they practice their own black flight, they pretend to be 'with the brothas and sistas' by yapping about BLM.
    In truth, middle class blacks want police protection from the bad black thugs.

    If they really cared for blacks in da hood, why don't they master business and set up business in those communities?
    Instead, they want 'clean' government jobs paid for by white tax payers.
    But unable to face up to their hypocrisy, they just drown out the truth with self-righteous and self-serving BS about BLM.

    As for police 'brutality', it was ordered by Libs themselves who want to revive cities from black crime.

    Lib elites are devious. They call for more tough policing but then blame police when blacks get riled up. They are like the devious general in PATHS OF GLORY. Playing both sides while serving oneself.

    , @Anonymous
    BLM doesn’t mean “White lives don’t matter”.


    Its exactly what it means and what they mean and most will even tell you. Now I know you are probably a white liberal so I understand your rhetoric but you are still full of shlt.
    , @boogerbently
    BLM is a HATE GROUP. The black version of KKK.
    Until they are reviled as much as the KKK, "no justice, no peace".
    , @KenH
    Yes it does and it's just another effort by worthless blacks to grab center stage and make their problems, which are largely of their own making, bigger and more important that any other racial group since this often translates into a transfer of wealth to them. Every time people say "All Lives Matter" the BLM people become enraged and scream, "No, black lives matter". And to my knowledge, no BLM members have condemned the shootings of the white police officers and the anti-white racial hatred that motivated them. So I can make a strong case that they are a black supremacist and anti-white terror supporting group.

    But the $64,000.00 question is why do black lives only matter when they are shot by white police officers when blacks kill other blacks 93% of the time? That is a question BLM, their many media allies and white libtards refuse to answer.

    , @Jim Christian
    Well, the question should really be "Do the particular thug Black lives snuffed by cops matter?"

    No to me they don't, not one bit. If the Black's lives don't matter to Blacks killing each other then explain to me why I as a law-abiding White male should care? Hell no they don't matter. Thug lives do NOT matter.

  15. @Epaminondas
    The left are trying to form a narrative around this which justifies the formation of a federalized police force. This federal police agency would replace your local police, state patrol, and sheriff's deputies. Think about that for a moment.

    The left are trying to form a narrative around this which justifies the formation of a federalized police force.

    It’s all in place just waiting for the Emergency to be declared, then all LEAs in the US are under Homeland Security, local boundaries vanish.

    All lines of authority are in place, everyone has their orders, all that lacks is the Emergency.

    Give it a decade or so yet.

    Read More
  16. @Anonymous
    I agree. Cops should stop policing blacks.

    Only deep shock can awake the asleep, and bring them back to reality.

    Its already being happening. Chicago is already up 100 homicides from last year.

    Read More
  17. @Epaminondas
    The left are trying to form a narrative around this which justifies the formation of a federalized police force. This federal police agency would replace your local police, state patrol, and sheriff's deputies. Think about that for a moment.

    That is exactly what is behind this.

    Read More
  18. I agree that cops should stand down enforcement activity. The millennials do not have a living memory of when crime was chaotic. They do not understand that a quarter century ago, when people traveled into a rust belt city they feared the reasonable chance of getting robbed, or their vehicle stolen.
    The leftist handlers promote the hatred of easily led afro americans because it helps with accomplishing their own agenda. That is why their is no cure for this until leftist die off, because they will never stop creating their destructive mischief. They view their misguided failures as success, which is completely contrary to the results produced (they just keep repeating their mantra that it needs more funding).
    But people do not ask what is the purpose of all this leftist created discontent? What is the end goal if it is not the creation of destructive chaos? Can they even articulate how the creation of our grievance culture and deficit spending will create a functioning prosperous nation.
    If leftist were not a influence then maybe we would have a chance of making many afro americans productive members of society, and compel them to give up their chronic complaining. But then the leftist would lose their power base.
    I do not mind when a leftist is victimized by crime, for let them suffer the consequences of the monster they created. Unfortunately while the leftist accumulate power for their massive social engineering experiment, & use ignorant afro americans to advance their agenda, the rest of us will be left with the bad results when it ultimately fails.

    Read More
  19. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    The act that Hillary still leads after all those dead cops and victims of terrorism shows that US is messed up.

    As for the lies of the Lib Glob elite, get a load of this.

    http://www.amren.com/news/2016/07/facebook-blames-its-lack-of-diversity-on-americas-lackluster-public-education-system/

    Funny. Even blacks in schools with inferior gym facilities have done better than other races.

    Could it have something to do with genetics?

    Gym Crow is real. Biology discriminates in favor of blacks in speed and power.
    But not in math and science.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Outwest
    You may be wrong on one point. The local university decided it couldn’t compete in sports without a $40,000,000 locker and workout room.
    , @War for Blair Mountain
    Hillary Clinton has a slight lead over Trump because the Democratic Party has been importing her...or should I refer to "her" as "it" instead.....nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc since 1965.

    Hillary Clinton would not be a viable POTUS candidate in 2016 if America was still 90 percent Native Born White American.

    The announcement of Hillary Clinton as POTUS on Nov 8 2016 will not be because of rigged voting machines. If Clinton is announced as POTUS on Nov 8 8PM, it will be a direct consequence of a demographically rigged Immigration Policy...rigged for 51 years.


    "I'm with It!!!!"...It 2016!!!!!!!!!!!!
  20. Those ‘Too Big to Fail’ Wall Street Casinos are in worse shape now than in 2007. The economy is still in the crapper. Our infrastructure is shot to hell and we’ve got endless wars going on overseas that are only benefitting a select few and what do people complain about?

    Nut case Hillary barking at the moon.

    Read More
  21. @Greasy William

    NAACP was founded and still funded by Zionist Jews
     
    Enough with the Jews, already! We want to complain about blacks in peace.

    “Enough with the Jews, already!”

    But darling – they are not finished with anti-Black White racist like you.

    Remembering Solon Blatt …..

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2013/06/04/the-strange-career-of-solomon-blatt/

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish

    ... racist like you.
     
    I guess I can start calling you a lying hypocrite camel humping raghead instead of just a lying camel humping raghead.
  22. So much for elections.

    LA Times / Jamie Kirchick* advocates military coup if Trump elected.

    http://www.breitbart.com/california/2016/07/20/coup-kirchick-los-angeles-times-suggests-president-trump/

    * Israel Firster, columnist for Israel’s Haaretz, neo-Con

    Read More
  23. @Priss Factor
    The act that Hillary still leads after all those dead cops and victims of terrorism shows that US is messed up.

    As for the lies of the Lib Glob elite, get a load of this.

    http://www.amren.com/news/2016/07/facebook-blames-its-lack-of-diversity-on-americas-lackluster-public-education-system/

    Funny. Even blacks in schools with inferior gym facilities have done better than other races.

    Could it have something to do with genetics?

    Gym Crow is real. Biology discriminates in favor of blacks in speed and power.
    But not in math and science.

    You may be wrong on one point. The local university decided it couldn’t compete in sports without a $40,000,000 locker and workout room.

    Read More
  24. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    This election should be patriotic people vs the globalist establishment.

    But the GLOB has many peoples on its side.

    Immigrant groups want open borders for tribal and economic reasons. They want free access to America for their people. So, the Estab has them.

    Also, GLOB controls elite education, therefore many college-educated people are into ‘virtue-signaling’ about how they are not ‘racist’. And so many Americans are now college-educated or college-indoctrinated.

    Also, everyone is into pop culture, and ‘coolness’ is associated with globalism, proggy-ism, and anti-white-ism. This affects even unprivileged whites. They don’t have much, but they feel ‘rich’ in their cultural ‘cool’ and moral upmanship in relation to PC and Pop Culture.

    And Dems have blacks cuz of Civil Rights legacy just like GOP had black votes for a long time due to Lincoln and Emancipation.

    But eventually, the party of Lincoln became the business party, the party of the rich. Its connection to blacks became symbolic than real.

    Same seems to be happening to the Democratic Party, now the party of the 1%.
    But because of its political legacy — New Deal, Civil Rights, etc — , Dems still carry many of the lefty votes.

    But the fact that Dems promote homomania above all else shows that it’s all about globo-elitism. After all, homo queenie meanies are a bunch of hissy elitists who cater to the rich and powerful. That’s why the 1% love them so much.

    Also, GOP got labeled as the party of rich and business class, and it’s gonna take some time to shake off that brand that is still stuck.
    Indeed, Trump represents the contradiction. He’s a rich globalist billionaire, but he panders to the American working class.

    GOP will eventually have to become a social democratic conservative patriotic party for the middle class and working class. Not hostile to capitalism but hostile to globalist brand of capitalism that prioritizes the profits of the 1% and urban professionals above all else.

    Also, pop culture is poisoning America. It is no longer just fun and games. It is destroying souls and lives.

    Read More
  25. @Jason Liu
    BLM doesn't mean "White lives don't matter". That is just a weak, defensive derailment by white people who don't know the slightest thing about ethnic conflict. You sound like the political equivalent of that kid who keeps going "What about meeeeeeee?!" Nobody will be convinced except for the people who already agree with you.

    The right response would be something like, who said black lives didn't matter? Or, why does a few shootings mean black lives don't matter? And if the activist insist on exaggerating their victimhood, then a good old fashioned "Fuck you, and fuck your fake grievances" should suffice.

    I agree with you.

    BLM by framing the issue of police brutality as a race issue is not really interested in solving the problem of police brutality which is a real problem affecting both whites and blacks. The rules of engagement practiced by American police need to be changed. Unfortunately this is very unlikely to happen as Americans really accept police brutality and consider it as normal (movies, media, historical American mentality of solving conflicts by violence). The uniquely American phenomenon of suicide by police is a proof that something is really very wrong with police rules of engagement. Robots with primitive AI software could produce the same outcomes. American police behave like occupational foreign force. Some like to compare it to IDF in Gaza citing training by Israel connected security firms. While this might be a factor, the problem of police brutality in America is older than the State of Israel.

    By framing the problem of police brutality as a racial issue assures that the problem will not be solved. BLM was started to stir things up to keep attention away from socioeconomic issues on which people could actually unite. It is a part of divide et impera tactics that always worked and sadly will always work. Having ethnic minority that is economically disadvantaged and criminogenic is really a gift to any ruling class. Slavery is a gift that keeps on giving to new plantation owners. Did the Founding Fathers know what they were doing?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Olorin

    The rules of engagement practiced by American police need to be changed.
     
    To what?

    BLM argues that blacks should be treated differently under the law (you know, separate but equal). Also given more leeway to commit petty and major crimes alike. Then not be equally treated afterwards. Even to get benefits (money, programs, services) from being sociopaths.

    At the same time, orderly and law-abiding populations are supposed to suffer the forced insertion into our neighborhoods of these lawless low-IQ no-impulse-control rampagers.

    The effect of this is to seed good neighborhoods with criminals who are given carte noire to victimize anyone they feel like in any way they feel like. Because racism.

    "American police," as you so Democratically/Hillary-ously put it (as though police are already a fully federalized/centralized/unitary function), have been changing how they engage with blacks my entire lifetime. Change after change, program after program, training after training, model after model, zillions after zillions of dollars.

    IT DOESN'T MATTER.

    Blacks are genetically blacks and will act the way they act. Without strong limits and swift punishments, they act worse.

    THEY ARE GENETICALLY INCAPABLE OF OTHERWISE ACTING.

    This is an evolutionary gap of some 50,000 years playing out. There isn't going to be white civilization in another 50 years, never mind 50,000, when these Stone Age types are allowed to run rampant in the name of whatever the SJW fantasy of the moment is (for getting votes with).

    The sooner liberals grow some balls and start admitting this (and recognizing they've believed this all along), the better off we'll all be. Including 85-90% of their pet blacks, who destroy their OWN lives precisely because they have none of the needed external checks on their behavior or consequences for running amok.

    So all this crap about how "the problem is the police" is just jungle-pandering. Disarm the law-abiding, let blacks commit mayhem, then the social worker cops come in and stroke their woolly little heads and tell them how downtrodden they be, here, have a few million dollars in taxpayer-funded Social Services staffed by nice SJWs with public pensions.

    I saw this play out in my home town from 1964 to the 1980s. I strongly recommend against any community taking the same path. Civilization cannot coexist with blacks being blacks.

    If you don't care about white civilization, or hate whitey, then at least pretend to care for the blacks this set of bat-shit-crazy politics is tormenting and destroying.

  26. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    There’s been a need for moral justification in American Politics.

    The Republican Party won the moral upperhand with the defeat over the Slave States and the freeing of the slaves. It was the party of Emancipation.
    This put Democrats, the Southern Party, at a disadvantage.

    But then, the Democrats gain moral righteousness as the party of poor white farmers, the working class, and needy immigrants against the rich Wasp elites concentrated in the GOP.
    And GOP moral credit further eroded because its link with blacks became more and more symbolic than real.

    When Democrats began to champion the blacks and radical youths, it lost many of the white ethnics, middle class, and working class. But the children of those ‘Nixon-Reagan Democrats’ were raised on PC education and Pop Culture that turned them into Progs.

    Today, Democrats have blacks, but the Democratic elites and blacks are drifting apart with homos and immigrants serving as a wedge. When will blacks realize that immigration is hurting them too? Blacks think in terms of ‘whatever is bad for GOP is good for us’. But the rise of homomania and immigration has put blacks in the back of the bus.

    And immigrants are pro-Democratic because Democratic elites value cheap docile immigrant labor and because immigrants vote Democratic.
    But we are seeing cracks in this coalition too. After all, the elites of Democratic Party are the richest people in America, very often Jewish.
    This makes many non-white groups leery of Jewish elite power.

    Trump is trying to bring together white middle class, white working class, blacks, and patriotic immigrants. Trump is hoping that immigrants who settled in the US in recent yrs favor Americanism over ethno-interests. But we are not seeing this with Hispanics. Even many legal Hispanics emotionally side with illegals and their native nations than with US patriotism that they associate with Gringo. On the other hand, they are none-too-happy with Democratic Party being controlled by the 1% in Wall Street and Hollywood and Silicon Valley, the super oligarchs, often Jewish.

    Read More
  27. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Priss Factor
    The act that Hillary still leads after all those dead cops and victims of terrorism shows that US is messed up.

    As for the lies of the Lib Glob elite, get a load of this.

    http://www.amren.com/news/2016/07/facebook-blames-its-lack-of-diversity-on-americas-lackluster-public-education-system/

    Funny. Even blacks in schools with inferior gym facilities have done better than other races.

    Could it have something to do with genetics?

    Gym Crow is real. Biology discriminates in favor of blacks in speed and power.
    But not in math and science.

    Hillary Clinton has a slight lead over Trump because the Democratic Party has been importing her…or should I refer to “her” as “it” instead…..nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc since 1965.

    Hillary Clinton would not be a viable POTUS candidate in 2016 if America was still 90 percent Native Born White American.

    The announcement of Hillary Clinton as POTUS on Nov 8 2016 will not be because of rigged voting machines. If Clinton is announced as POTUS on Nov 8 8PM, it will be a direct consequence of a demographically rigged Immigration Policy…rigged for 51 years.

    “I’m with It!!!!”…It 2016!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "Hillary Clinton has a slight lead over Trump because the Democratic Party has been importing her"

    That's too simple. Remember that even very white states like Maine and Iowa went for Obama.
    Also, the rich educated white upper classes and upper-middle classes are anti-white. Their money and talent go to Dems, not least because Democratic Party has fused privilege and 'progressivism'. For one thing, bulk of proggy issues are about homos and trannies, no economic threat to the affluent class.
    Also, immigrants are a docile class of servant scab class that serve the affluent class. Via immigration issue, the globalist rich can have both cheaper labor(and buffer between themselves and blacks) AND virtue-signaling about 'inclusion'.

    Unless whites are 'red-pilled' by huge presence of non-whites, esp blacks as in the South, they vote Democratic because their perception of reality comes from media and academia dominated by PC and Pop Culture.

    It's like your average European thinks American reality is about mean nasty rednecks whupping helpless Negroes.

    Among non-whites, it is overwhelmingly Democratic.
    Among whites, it is just marginally pro-Republican, esp in the South where too many whites have been redpilled by too many blacks.

    But if we take out the Deep South, whites are hardly pro-Republican. In some of the whitest states, whites lean Democratic, sometimes by a huge margin.

    Look at Vermont.

    , @KenH
    If not for the "Ethnic cleansing of Whites act" of 1965 we never would have heard of Barack Obama except maybe as the Al Sharpton of Chicago. He would have been politically non-viable with a white electorate of 85-90%.
  28. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Jason Liu
    BLM doesn't mean "White lives don't matter". That is just a weak, defensive derailment by white people who don't know the slightest thing about ethnic conflict. You sound like the political equivalent of that kid who keeps going "What about meeeeeeee?!" Nobody will be convinced except for the people who already agree with you.

    The right response would be something like, who said black lives didn't matter? Or, why does a few shootings mean black lives don't matter? And if the activist insist on exaggerating their victimhood, then a good old fashioned "Fuck you, and fuck your fake grievances" should suffice.

    —–BLM doesn’t mean “White lives don’t matter”.——

    Considering that most racial violence is black on white and given that blacks are more likely to kill police(often white), BLM is a travesty.

    The movement we need is BLACK THUGGERY KILLS. But blacks act like perennial victims or blactims.

    And then, you got the middle class black angle. Black middle class have it good, but they are envious because other races still do better in prestigious departments in colleges. Blacks mostly major in social sciences or political science.
    So, black middle class is motivated mainly by resentment against their non-black peers(who are generally Liberal and proggy), but since it sounds petty to speak out in envy and resentment, they take up this bogus cause BLM as proxy for their personal and professional frustration.

    But these middle class blacks don’t want to deal with ghetto negroes either. If anything, they segregate themselves from bad blacks and prefer to live with non-blacks.
    But that makes them sound like uncle toms. They lose street cred. So, even as they practice their own black flight, they pretend to be ‘with the brothas and sistas’ by yapping about BLM.
    In truth, middle class blacks want police protection from the bad black thugs.

    If they really cared for blacks in da hood, why don’t they master business and set up business in those communities?
    Instead, they want ‘clean’ government jobs paid for by white tax payers.
    But unable to face up to their hypocrisy, they just drown out the truth with self-righteous and self-serving BS about BLM.

    As for police ‘brutality’, it was ordered by Libs themselves who want to revive cities from black crime.

    Lib elites are devious. They call for more tough policing but then blame police when blacks get riled up. They are like the devious general in PATHS OF GLORY. Playing both sides while serving oneself.

    Read More
  29. @Priss Factor
    http://gothamist.com/2016/07/19/yale_slavery_window_smasher.php

    Social Justice Vandalism like during the Cultural Revolution.

    A dumb nation.

    “Social Justice Vandalism like during the Cultural Revolution. ”

    Interesting observation. Over the last couple of years, I have made a few references to the “Cultural Revolution” experienced by China in the late 60′s/early 70′s and likened it to what was going on in the U.S. and got no responses. I haven’t been able to track down my TAC comments yet, but this is what I posted in response to a National Review article about “a year ago”:

    “tbraton • a year ago
    Maybe I missed it, but I have seen no reference drawing a comparison between the current travails on campus and in our society as a whole (the PC position on SSM, “campus rape,” man-made global warming (oops, make that “man-made climate change”), and you name it) with the trauma that consumed Communist China starting back in the mid-60′s known as the “Cultural Revolution.” I’m guessing that many Chinese intellectuals who lived through that trying period must be shaking their heads in wonderment and bemusement when they read about the current antics going on in the U.S. They must be thinking (in Chinese, of course) “been there, done that, better you than me.” ”

    BTW, it has nothing to do with the subject of this comment, but, in searching for my comments on TAC, I happened to run across this comment of mine dealing with the Libyan War five years ago, which made me laugh (although it is bad form, I often laugh at my own material):

    “tbraton says:
    March 20, 2011 at 4:55 pm
    “Odyssey Dawn in this regard by Day 2 already an obvious scam; Washington now buttoning up for incoming blowback.
    By the way, do you suppose the Classics scholar who was privileged to name this fiasco was slipping one over on his bosses or is just himself a dumb son-of-a bitch.”

    Classics? I think you are missing the point. Odyssey is a well-known minivan made by Honda. Dawn is a leading dish detergent made by Proctor and Gamble. Think marketing. They are trying to sell us a really bad product. I’m surprised they didn’t call the operation Edsel Classic Coke, but then the American public might have caught on.”

    Read More
  30. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @War for Blair Mountain
    Hillary Clinton has a slight lead over Trump because the Democratic Party has been importing her...or should I refer to "her" as "it" instead.....nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc since 1965.

    Hillary Clinton would not be a viable POTUS candidate in 2016 if America was still 90 percent Native Born White American.

    The announcement of Hillary Clinton as POTUS on Nov 8 2016 will not be because of rigged voting machines. If Clinton is announced as POTUS on Nov 8 8PM, it will be a direct consequence of a demographically rigged Immigration Policy...rigged for 51 years.


    "I'm with It!!!!"...It 2016!!!!!!!!!!!!

    “Hillary Clinton has a slight lead over Trump because the Democratic Party has been importing her”

    That’s too simple. Remember that even very white states like Maine and Iowa went for Obama.
    Also, the rich educated white upper classes and upper-middle classes are anti-white. Their money and talent go to Dems, not least because Democratic Party has fused privilege and ‘progressivism’. For one thing, bulk of proggy issues are about homos and trannies, no economic threat to the affluent class.
    Also, immigrants are a docile class of servant scab class that serve the affluent class. Via immigration issue, the globalist rich can have both cheaper labor(and buffer between themselves and blacks) AND virtue-signaling about ‘inclusion’.

    Unless whites are ‘red-pilled’ by huge presence of non-whites, esp blacks as in the South, they vote Democratic because their perception of reality comes from media and academia dominated by PC and Pop Culture.

    It’s like your average European thinks American reality is about mean nasty rednecks whupping helpless Negroes.

    Among non-whites, it is overwhelmingly Democratic.
    Among whites, it is just marginally pro-Republican, esp in the South where too many whites have been redpilled by too many blacks.

    But if we take out the Deep South, whites are hardly pro-Republican. In some of the whitest states, whites lean Democratic, sometimes by a huge margin.

    Look at Vermont.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark F.
    "Unless whites are ‘red-pilled’ by huge presence of non-whites, esp blacks as in the South, they vote Democratic because their perception of reality comes from media and academia dominated by PC and Pop Culture. "

    Not really true, whites in heavily black cities like Oakland, LA, NY and Chicago also vote for Democrats by a wide margin
    , @War for Blair Mountain
    Anonymy


    What you wrote isn't at all incapatible with what I wrote.


    If you include the US born geneline of post-1965 nonwhite legal immigrants...well, Hillary Clinton's nonwhite Democratic Party Voting is massive and growing exponentially...it is a demographic time bomb...and when this demographic time bomb is fully activated...well, at best Trump...4 and out...and onto POTUS Chelsea...this is the Clinton game plan.
  31. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    One thing for sure, the feelings of fat black biatch matters.

    On a lighter note, culture war turns into culture circus.

    We live in a world where a conservative is a Jewish Greek with fake blonde hair taking black homo cocks up his ass arguing with a big fat black ho starring in some dumb remake.

    Read More
  32. Some statistics
    Prison inmates: White 39% Black 40%

    From these numbers regardless of the ethnic make up of the society we conclude that police makes about the same number of arrest (leading to incarceration) of Blacks and Whites.

    In 2015 990 arrest/interventions went bad resulting in killing of 494 Whites and 258 Blacks.

    This is 1.9 time more Whites than Blacks being killed per the same number of arrests/interventions leading to incarceration.

    How to explain this discrepancy?

    (1) Do Whites tend to resist arrest more?

    (1a) Are White people suiciding themselves by police as part of their recently discovered dropping longevity?

    (2) Is police more anti-White racists than anti-Black racist?

    (3) Is police more careful when arresting Blacks because of more severe repercussions in media in case of Blacks being killed than Whites? Is it because Whites are bigger law and order suckers who are less likely to complain about police brutality?

    (4) Or is it because there is much larger number of Whites being arrested but the arrests do not lead to incarceration and prison populations does not reflect the number of actual interactions between Whites and police?

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish

    In 2015 990 arrest/interventions went bad resulting in killing of 494 Whites and 258 Blacks.
     
    This is an incomplete number. Police departments (PDs) are not required to report shootings by cops to the FBI, so no real record exists of how many people cops actually murder each year. With the small number of states requiring PDs to report, I expect the actual numbers are 3X to 5X higher than what you have.
  33. @Wally
    How revealing. Hildabeast and those like her live nowhere close to blacks.

    Put Section 8 housing in their neighborhoods and they would become Republicans.

    A must read:

    'Analysis of Washington Post police-shootings data reveals surprising result – nearly 2x more whites than blacks shot by police'

    - even though whites commit much, much less crimes

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/07/18/analysis-of-washington-post-police-shootings-data-reveals-surprising-result/

    The results are only surprising to the lying LSM presstitutes because they haven’t bothered to check the facts before spreading their lies.

    Read More
  34. @Rehmat
    "Enough with the Jews, already!"

    But darling - they are not finished with anti-Black White racist like you.

    Remembering Solon Blatt .....

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2013/06/04/the-strange-career-of-solomon-blatt/

    … racist like you.

    I guess I can start calling you a lying hypocrite camel humping raghead instead of just a lying camel humping raghead.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    When was the last time you read your Talmud, creep?

    In May 2014, Netanyahu during a speech he delivered at his ruling Likud party’s Yaakov Vider (religious branch) said that Talmud should become the Constitution of the State. He proposed to adopt Hebrew calendar (based on Moon-sighting like the Islamic calendar), and the Jewish Shari’ah (Gemara and Minsha), which is totally barbaric when it comes to women’s rights.

    “I’m going to personally be involved in the law defining the state of Israel as the nation-state for the Jewish people. It’s a very important law that will influence how Israel will look like in the future,” Netanyahu told his racist Jewish audience.

    “I want to anchor in this law, that it will be a Basic Law that the state of Israel arose and exists on the basis of Torah and the Jewish traditions,” Netanyahu explained – promising to define the Hebrew calendar as the official state calendar.

    I bet Netanyahu is aware of the fact that only a small minority of Jews follow Torah (Old Testament). The rest, especially the European Jewish communities inside Israel and in the West, follow the Babylonian Talmud, written a century after the disappearance of Jesus. Torah doesn’t mention Jesus, while Talmud is full of hatred toward Jesus, his mother Mary and the Christians at large.

    https://rehmat1.com/2014/05/30/bibi-talmud-will-block-the-palestinian-state/
  35. @utu
    Some statistics
    Prison inmates: White 39% Black 40%

    From these numbers regardless of the ethnic make up of the society we conclude that police makes about the same number of arrest (leading to incarceration) of Blacks and Whites.

    In 2015 990 arrest/interventions went bad resulting in killing of 494 Whites and 258 Blacks.

    This is 1.9 time more Whites than Blacks being killed per the same number of arrests/interventions leading to incarceration.

    How to explain this discrepancy?

    (1) Do Whites tend to resist arrest more?

    (1a) Are White people suiciding themselves by police as part of their recently discovered dropping longevity?

    (2) Is police more anti-White racists than anti-Black racist?

    (3) Is police more careful when arresting Blacks because of more severe repercussions in media in case of Blacks being killed than Whites? Is it because Whites are bigger law and order suckers who are less likely to complain about police brutality?

    (4) Or is it because there is much larger number of Whites being arrested but the arrests do not lead to incarceration and prison populations does not reflect the number of actual interactions between Whites and police?

    In 2015 990 arrest/interventions went bad resulting in killing of 494 Whites and 258 Blacks.

    This is an incomplete number. Police departments (PDs) are not required to report shootings by cops to the FBI, so no real record exists of how many people cops actually murder each year. With the small number of states requiring PDs to report, I expect the actual numbers are 3X to 5X higher than what you have.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    It might be incomplete number but that is what we got. It is close what Guardian project reports:

    http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2015/jun/01/the-counted-police-killings-us-database

    They say it is 306 for Blacks and 581 for Whites.

    But you missed the most important part of my comment that Whites are 1.9 times more likely to be killed than Blacks per the same number of arrests leading to incarceration. The number of arrests leading to incarceration is a good surrogate for the number of interactions with police. What is wrong with Whites or police that Whites are killed 1.9 more frequently than Blacks per the same number of interactions with police?
  36. @Priss Factor
    "Hillary Clinton has a slight lead over Trump because the Democratic Party has been importing her"

    That's too simple. Remember that even very white states like Maine and Iowa went for Obama.
    Also, the rich educated white upper classes and upper-middle classes are anti-white. Their money and talent go to Dems, not least because Democratic Party has fused privilege and 'progressivism'. For one thing, bulk of proggy issues are about homos and trannies, no economic threat to the affluent class.
    Also, immigrants are a docile class of servant scab class that serve the affluent class. Via immigration issue, the globalist rich can have both cheaper labor(and buffer between themselves and blacks) AND virtue-signaling about 'inclusion'.

    Unless whites are 'red-pilled' by huge presence of non-whites, esp blacks as in the South, they vote Democratic because their perception of reality comes from media and academia dominated by PC and Pop Culture.

    It's like your average European thinks American reality is about mean nasty rednecks whupping helpless Negroes.

    Among non-whites, it is overwhelmingly Democratic.
    Among whites, it is just marginally pro-Republican, esp in the South where too many whites have been redpilled by too many blacks.

    But if we take out the Deep South, whites are hardly pro-Republican. In some of the whitest states, whites lean Democratic, sometimes by a huge margin.

    Look at Vermont.

    “Unless whites are ‘red-pilled’ by huge presence of non-whites, esp blacks as in the South, they vote Democratic because their perception of reality comes from media and academia dominated by PC and Pop Culture. ”

    Not really true, whites in heavily black cities like Oakland, LA, NY and Chicago also vote for Democrats by a wide margin

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    And yet by a wide margin those whites refuse to live in heavily black neighborhoods.

    So what do they really know about blacks?

    , @Priss Factor
    "Not really true, whites in heavily black cities like Oakland, LA, NY and Chicago also vote for Democrats by a wide margin."

    But Jews, whites, and homos control the Democratic machine in such places.
    When blacks take over Democratic machines, white just flee, as in Detroit.

    In the South, Democratic control means black takeover of power.

    This isn't necessarily the case in cities like Chicago, NY, San Fran, and even Oakland.

    Also, as urban Libs tend to be more skilled and privileged, they have ample means to rise above blacks and keep their privilege, something missing to dimwit hillbillies in the Sooooouuuth.
    , @War for Blair Mountain
    That's a tricky question because of White Blue Collar flight. Moreover, the relevant statistic is what percentage of the total eligible White Voters are actually voting in a given area.


    The Trump nomination yesterday is very strong evidence for massive red pilling going on amongst the Native Born White American Working Class...although a lot more red pilling is required.



    If you don't ask the right question....you'll never get the right answer.
  37. @Epaminondas
    The left are trying to form a narrative around this which justifies the formation of a federalized police force. This federal police agency would replace your local police, state patrol, and sheriff's deputies. Think about that for a moment.

    Precisely.

    Read More
  38. @utu
    I agree with you.

    BLM by framing the issue of police brutality as a race issue is not really interested in solving the problem of police brutality which is a real problem affecting both whites and blacks. The rules of engagement practiced by American police need to be changed. Unfortunately this is very unlikely to happen as Americans really accept police brutality and consider it as normal (movies, media, historical American mentality of solving conflicts by violence). The uniquely American phenomenon of suicide by police is a proof that something is really very wrong with police rules of engagement. Robots with primitive AI software could produce the same outcomes. American police behave like occupational foreign force. Some like to compare it to IDF in Gaza citing training by Israel connected security firms. While this might be a factor, the problem of police brutality in America is older than the State of Israel.

    By framing the problem of police brutality as a racial issue assures that the problem will not be solved. BLM was started to stir things up to keep attention away from socioeconomic issues on which people could actually unite. It is a part of divide et impera tactics that always worked and sadly will always work. Having ethnic minority that is economically disadvantaged and criminogenic is really a gift to any ruling class. Slavery is a gift that keeps on giving to new plantation owners. Did the Founding Fathers know what they were doing?

    The rules of engagement practiced by American police need to be changed.

    To what?

    BLM argues that blacks should be treated differently under the law (you know, separate but equal). Also given more leeway to commit petty and major crimes alike. Then not be equally treated afterwards. Even to get benefits (money, programs, services) from being sociopaths.

    At the same time, orderly and law-abiding populations are supposed to suffer the forced insertion into our neighborhoods of these lawless low-IQ no-impulse-control rampagers.

    The effect of this is to seed good neighborhoods with criminals who are given carte noire to victimize anyone they feel like in any way they feel like. Because racism.

    “American police,” as you so Democratically/Hillary-ously put it (as though police are already a fully federalized/centralized/unitary function), have been changing how they engage with blacks my entire lifetime. Change after change, program after program, training after training, model after model, zillions after zillions of dollars.

    IT DOESN’T MATTER.

    Blacks are genetically blacks and will act the way they act. Without strong limits and swift punishments, they act worse.

    THEY ARE GENETICALLY INCAPABLE OF OTHERWISE ACTING.

    This is an evolutionary gap of some 50,000 years playing out. There isn’t going to be white civilization in another 50 years, never mind 50,000, when these Stone Age types are allowed to run rampant in the name of whatever the SJW fantasy of the moment is (for getting votes with).

    The sooner liberals grow some balls and start admitting this (and recognizing they’ve believed this all along), the better off we’ll all be. Including 85-90% of their pet blacks, who destroy their OWN lives precisely because they have none of the needed external checks on their behavior or consequences for running amok.

    So all this crap about how “the problem is the police” is just jungle-pandering. Disarm the law-abiding, let blacks commit mayhem, then the social worker cops come in and stroke their woolly little heads and tell them how downtrodden they be, here, have a few million dollars in taxpayer-funded Social Services staffed by nice SJWs with public pensions.

    I saw this play out in my home town from 1964 to the 1980s. I strongly recommend against any community taking the same path. Civilization cannot coexist with blacks being blacks.

    If you don’t care about white civilization, or hate whitey, then at least pretend to care for the blacks this set of bat-shit-crazy politics is tormenting and destroying.

    Read More
  39. @Mark F.
    "Unless whites are ‘red-pilled’ by huge presence of non-whites, esp blacks as in the South, they vote Democratic because their perception of reality comes from media and academia dominated by PC and Pop Culture. "

    Not really true, whites in heavily black cities like Oakland, LA, NY and Chicago also vote for Democrats by a wide margin

    And yet by a wide margin those whites refuse to live in heavily black neighborhoods.

    So what do they really know about blacks?

    Read More
  40. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Mark F.
    "Unless whites are ‘red-pilled’ by huge presence of non-whites, esp blacks as in the South, they vote Democratic because their perception of reality comes from media and academia dominated by PC and Pop Culture. "

    Not really true, whites in heavily black cities like Oakland, LA, NY and Chicago also vote for Democrats by a wide margin

    “Not really true, whites in heavily black cities like Oakland, LA, NY and Chicago also vote for Democrats by a wide margin.”

    But Jews, whites, and homos control the Democratic machine in such places.
    When blacks take over Democratic machines, white just flee, as in Detroit.

    In the South, Democratic control means black takeover of power.

    This isn’t necessarily the case in cities like Chicago, NY, San Fran, and even Oakland.

    Also, as urban Libs tend to be more skilled and privileged, they have ample means to rise above blacks and keep their privilege, something missing to dimwit hillbillies in the Sooooouuuth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CCZ
    From Detroit Free Press, regarding U of Michigan disrupted Regents meeting, see especially last sentence:

    The demonstration broke out about 10 minutes into the regular public meeting, when the protesters jumped up from their seats in the audience. Chanting, "We don't need another committee. Open it up to Detroit city," and "Open it up or we'll shut it down."

    They pushed forward toward a roped-off area separating the public from administrators and the board. U-M officials and police tried to block the protesters as chanting grew louder.

    The police and protesters then engaged in a brief shoving match, with chairs being flipped over and tables pushed back.

    The regents and administrators then left.

    "When the activists broke through barriers, I thought my personal space was being invaded," said U-M Regent Denise Ilitch, a Democrat. "It was a new experience for me to feel physically threatened."
  41. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    http://dailykenn.blogspot.de/2012/11/stuff-white-people-invented.html?m=1

    Well, Motown isn’t an invention, but it was great in its heyday.

    Blacks are tops at inventing lies though.

    BLM, sheeeiiiit.

    Read More
  42. @woodNfish

    ... racist like you.
     
    I guess I can start calling you a lying hypocrite camel humping raghead instead of just a lying camel humping raghead.

    When was the last time you read your Talmud, creep?

    In May 2014, Netanyahu during a speech he delivered at his ruling Likud party’s Yaakov Vider (religious branch) said that Talmud should become the Constitution of the State. He proposed to adopt Hebrew calendar (based on Moon-sighting like the Islamic calendar), and the Jewish Shari’ah (Gemara and Minsha), which is totally barbaric when it comes to women’s rights.

    “I’m going to personally be involved in the law defining the state of Israel as the nation-state for the Jewish people. It’s a very important law that will influence how Israel will look like in the future,” Netanyahu told his racist Jewish audience.

    “I want to anchor in this law, that it will be a Basic Law that the state of Israel arose and exists on the basis of Torah and the Jewish traditions,” Netanyahu explained – promising to define the Hebrew calendar as the official state calendar.

    I bet Netanyahu is aware of the fact that only a small minority of Jews follow Torah (Old Testament). The rest, especially the European Jewish communities inside Israel and in the West, follow the Babylonian Talmud, written a century after the disappearance of Jesus. Torah doesn’t mention Jesus, while Talmud is full of hatred toward Jesus, his mother Mary and the Christians at large.

    https://rehmat1.com/2014/05/30/bibi-talmud-will-block-the-palestinian-state/

    Read More
  43. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Mark F.
    "Unless whites are ‘red-pilled’ by huge presence of non-whites, esp blacks as in the South, they vote Democratic because their perception of reality comes from media and academia dominated by PC and Pop Culture. "

    Not really true, whites in heavily black cities like Oakland, LA, NY and Chicago also vote for Democrats by a wide margin

    That’s a tricky question because of White Blue Collar flight. Moreover, the relevant statistic is what percentage of the total eligible White Voters are actually voting in a given area.

    The Trump nomination yesterday is very strong evidence for massive red pilling going on amongst the Native Born White American Working Class…although a lot more red pilling is required.

    If you don’t ask the right question….you’ll never get the right answer.

    Read More
  44. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Priss Factor
    "Hillary Clinton has a slight lead over Trump because the Democratic Party has been importing her"

    That's too simple. Remember that even very white states like Maine and Iowa went for Obama.
    Also, the rich educated white upper classes and upper-middle classes are anti-white. Their money and talent go to Dems, not least because Democratic Party has fused privilege and 'progressivism'. For one thing, bulk of proggy issues are about homos and trannies, no economic threat to the affluent class.
    Also, immigrants are a docile class of servant scab class that serve the affluent class. Via immigration issue, the globalist rich can have both cheaper labor(and buffer between themselves and blacks) AND virtue-signaling about 'inclusion'.

    Unless whites are 'red-pilled' by huge presence of non-whites, esp blacks as in the South, they vote Democratic because their perception of reality comes from media and academia dominated by PC and Pop Culture.

    It's like your average European thinks American reality is about mean nasty rednecks whupping helpless Negroes.

    Among non-whites, it is overwhelmingly Democratic.
    Among whites, it is just marginally pro-Republican, esp in the South where too many whites have been redpilled by too many blacks.

    But if we take out the Deep South, whites are hardly pro-Republican. In some of the whitest states, whites lean Democratic, sometimes by a huge margin.

    Look at Vermont.

    Anonymy

    What you wrote isn’t at all incapatible with what I wrote.

    If you include the US born geneline of post-1965 nonwhite legal immigrants…well, Hillary Clinton’s nonwhite Democratic Party Voting is massive and growing exponentially…it is a demographic time bomb…and when this demographic time bomb is fully activated…well, at best Trump…4 and out…and onto POTUS Chelsea…this is the Clinton game plan.

    Read More
  45. @woodNfish

    In 2015 990 arrest/interventions went bad resulting in killing of 494 Whites and 258 Blacks.
     
    This is an incomplete number. Police departments (PDs) are not required to report shootings by cops to the FBI, so no real record exists of how many people cops actually murder each year. With the small number of states requiring PDs to report, I expect the actual numbers are 3X to 5X higher than what you have.

    It might be incomplete number but that is what we got. It is close what Guardian project reports:

    http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2015/jun/01/the-counted-police-killings-us-database

    They say it is 306 for Blacks and 581 for Whites.

    But you missed the most important part of my comment that Whites are 1.9 times more likely to be killed than Blacks per the same number of arrests leading to incarceration. The number of arrests leading to incarceration is a good surrogate for the number of interactions with police. What is wrong with Whites or police that Whites are killed 1.9 more frequently than Blacks per the same number of interactions with police?

    Read More
    • Replies: @woodNfish
    No, I didn't miss anything. If you have followed my posts you know that I have repeatedly pointed out that cops murder more unarmed whites every year than blacks. I don't think it is racial, I think cops are trained to murder people. Paul Roberts agrees.
  46. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Priss Factor
    Cops should just go easy on black crime.

    Cops did all the dirty work to save cities so that affluent Libs can have their gentropolis.
    They were ordered to get tough on Negroes.
    But now, the Libs are acting like they are totally innocent and it's all cops' fault.

    Also, blacks never thank cops for saving blacks from... other blacks.

    So, cops should just let blacks kill blacks and let black burn down big Liberal cities and attack Libs.

    Who the hell cares?

    LET BLACKS KILL BLACKS AND WHITE/JEWISH/YELLOW/HOMO LIBERALS.

    So you’re for self inflicted genocide? Even on innocents?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jim Christian
    If THEY don't care about their self-inflicted genocide, why the hell should WE? As it is, Whites are on a roll toward self-inflicted genocide. You for that, Willardy?
  47. @Greasy William

    NAACP was founded and still funded by Zionist Jews
     
    Enough with the Jews, already! We want to complain about blacks in peace.

    Greasy William, Rehmat’s comment is quite valid. Black Lives Matter (BLM), the New Black Panthers, etc. are supported by none other than George Soros, a billionaire Jew. Soros has been paying anti-Trump protesters $15/hour to stage protests at Trump rallies, and has done so to stage protests at the RNC in Cleveland.
    Soros was also behind violent protests in a number of cities, paying $15/hour to the participants. Incitement to violence wherein either innocents and/or police are injured and/or killed is a felony. Period.

    Read More
  48. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Jason Liu
    BLM doesn't mean "White lives don't matter". That is just a weak, defensive derailment by white people who don't know the slightest thing about ethnic conflict. You sound like the political equivalent of that kid who keeps going "What about meeeeeeee?!" Nobody will be convinced except for the people who already agree with you.

    The right response would be something like, who said black lives didn't matter? Or, why does a few shootings mean black lives don't matter? And if the activist insist on exaggerating their victimhood, then a good old fashioned "Fuck you, and fuck your fake grievances" should suffice.

    BLM doesn’t mean “White lives don’t matter”.

    Its exactly what it means and what they mean and most will even tell you. Now I know you are probably a white liberal so I understand your rhetoric but you are still full of shlt.

    Read More
  49. @Jason Liu
    BLM doesn't mean "White lives don't matter". That is just a weak, defensive derailment by white people who don't know the slightest thing about ethnic conflict. You sound like the political equivalent of that kid who keeps going "What about meeeeeeee?!" Nobody will be convinced except for the people who already agree with you.

    The right response would be something like, who said black lives didn't matter? Or, why does a few shootings mean black lives don't matter? And if the activist insist on exaggerating their victimhood, then a good old fashioned "Fuck you, and fuck your fake grievances" should suffice.

    BLM is a HATE GROUP. The black version of KKK.
    Until they are reviled as much as the KKK, “no justice, no peace”.

    Read More
  50. @War for Blair Mountain
    Hillary Clinton has a slight lead over Trump because the Democratic Party has been importing her...or should I refer to "her" as "it" instead.....nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc since 1965.

    Hillary Clinton would not be a viable POTUS candidate in 2016 if America was still 90 percent Native Born White American.

    The announcement of Hillary Clinton as POTUS on Nov 8 2016 will not be because of rigged voting machines. If Clinton is announced as POTUS on Nov 8 8PM, it will be a direct consequence of a demographically rigged Immigration Policy...rigged for 51 years.


    "I'm with It!!!!"...It 2016!!!!!!!!!!!!

    If not for the “Ethnic cleansing of Whites act” of 1965 we never would have heard of Barack Obama except maybe as the Al Sharpton of Chicago. He would have been politically non-viable with a white electorate of 85-90%.

    Read More
  51. @Jason Liu
    BLM doesn't mean "White lives don't matter". That is just a weak, defensive derailment by white people who don't know the slightest thing about ethnic conflict. You sound like the political equivalent of that kid who keeps going "What about meeeeeeee?!" Nobody will be convinced except for the people who already agree with you.

    The right response would be something like, who said black lives didn't matter? Or, why does a few shootings mean black lives don't matter? And if the activist insist on exaggerating their victimhood, then a good old fashioned "Fuck you, and fuck your fake grievances" should suffice.

    Yes it does and it’s just another effort by worthless blacks to grab center stage and make their problems, which are largely of their own making, bigger and more important that any other racial group since this often translates into a transfer of wealth to them. Every time people say “All Lives Matter” the BLM people become enraged and scream, “No, black lives matter”. And to my knowledge, no BLM members have condemned the shootings of the white police officers and the anti-white racial hatred that motivated them. So I can make a strong case that they are a black supremacist and anti-white terror supporting group.

    But the $64,000.00 question is why do black lives only matter when they are shot by white police officers when blacks kill other blacks 93% of the time? That is a question BLM, their many media allies and white libtards refuse to answer.

    Read More
    • Replies: @another fred

    But the $64,000.00 question is why do black lives only matter when they are shot by white police officers when blacks kill other blacks 93% of the time? That is a question BLM, their many media allies and white libtards refuse to answer.
     
    The answer is very simple, the "Black Lives" are being used for political advantage. Neither "Justice" nor "Truth" have the least bit to do with the matter.

    /not to say that those on the right are pure hearted

  52. But sometimes the irony is acute and perhaps even true “social justice” prevails.

    From the news:

    With 55 shootings and five deaths, the weekend in Chicago was particularly bloody, so much so that Sunday marked itself as having the most shootings in a single day in over a year.

    First Deputy Superintendent John Escalante commented on one of the deaths, saying that in a particular way the justice system failed the victim.

    Raygene Jackson, 38, was murdered on Sunday, but according to Escalante, he should have still been safely in jail and not walking the streets.

    “I don’t mean to victimize this victim any further, this man lost his life,” Escalante said. “But our frustration is, in 1995 he was sentenced to 46 years in the Illinois Department of Corrections for a murder. In 1995. He was paroled last year. How and why he’s on the street, I don’t know. But if he was still serving his sentence, he wouldn’t be a murder victim right now.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Olorin
    Soooooooooo...liberals are freeing murderous blacks to commit the capital punishment on each other that SJWs can't bring themselves to approve?

    Hard to feel bad about that.
  53. @KenH
    Yes it does and it's just another effort by worthless blacks to grab center stage and make their problems, which are largely of their own making, bigger and more important that any other racial group since this often translates into a transfer of wealth to them. Every time people say "All Lives Matter" the BLM people become enraged and scream, "No, black lives matter". And to my knowledge, no BLM members have condemned the shootings of the white police officers and the anti-white racial hatred that motivated them. So I can make a strong case that they are a black supremacist and anti-white terror supporting group.

    But the $64,000.00 question is why do black lives only matter when they are shot by white police officers when blacks kill other blacks 93% of the time? That is a question BLM, their many media allies and white libtards refuse to answer.

    But the $64,000.00 question is why do black lives only matter when they are shot by white police officers when blacks kill other blacks 93% of the time? That is a question BLM, their many media allies and white libtards refuse to answer.

    The answer is very simple, the “Black Lives” are being used for political advantage. Neither “Justice” nor “Truth” have the least bit to do with the matter.

    /not to say that those on the right are pure hearted

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH

    /not to say that those on the right are pure hearted
     
    You'll have to explain what you mean. The right is more pure hearted than the anti-white left. The facts favor "the right" and our case against them is much stronger than their flimsy case against whites.
  54. @Epaminondas
    The left are trying to form a narrative around this which justifies the formation of a federalized police force. This federal police agency would replace your local police, state patrol, and sheriff's deputies. Think about that for a moment.

    Federales coming to el norte. Probably much sooner than you think.

    Read More
  55. @Priss Factor
    "Not really true, whites in heavily black cities like Oakland, LA, NY and Chicago also vote for Democrats by a wide margin."

    But Jews, whites, and homos control the Democratic machine in such places.
    When blacks take over Democratic machines, white just flee, as in Detroit.

    In the South, Democratic control means black takeover of power.

    This isn't necessarily the case in cities like Chicago, NY, San Fran, and even Oakland.

    Also, as urban Libs tend to be more skilled and privileged, they have ample means to rise above blacks and keep their privilege, something missing to dimwit hillbillies in the Sooooouuuth.

    From Detroit Free Press, regarding U of Michigan disrupted Regents meeting, see especially last sentence:

    The demonstration broke out about 10 minutes into the regular public meeting, when the protesters jumped up from their seats in the audience. Chanting, “We don’t need another committee. Open it up to Detroit city,” and “Open it up or we’ll shut it down.”

    They pushed forward toward a roped-off area separating the public from administrators and the board. U-M officials and police tried to block the protesters as chanting grew louder.

    The police and protesters then engaged in a brief shoving match, with chairs being flipped over and tables pushed back.

    The regents and administrators then left.

    “When the activists broke through barriers, I thought my personal space was being invaded,” said U-M Regent Denise Ilitch, a Democrat. “It was a new experience for me to feel physically threatened.”

    Read More
  56. @Anonymous
    So you're for self inflicted genocide? Even on innocents?

    If THEY don’t care about their self-inflicted genocide, why the hell should WE? As it is, Whites are on a roll toward self-inflicted genocide. You for that, Willardy?

    Read More
  57. @Jason Liu
    BLM doesn't mean "White lives don't matter". That is just a weak, defensive derailment by white people who don't know the slightest thing about ethnic conflict. You sound like the political equivalent of that kid who keeps going "What about meeeeeeee?!" Nobody will be convinced except for the people who already agree with you.

    The right response would be something like, who said black lives didn't matter? Or, why does a few shootings mean black lives don't matter? And if the activist insist on exaggerating their victimhood, then a good old fashioned "Fuck you, and fuck your fake grievances" should suffice.

    Well, the question should really be “Do the particular thug Black lives snuffed by cops matter?”

    No to me they don’t, not one bit. If the Black’s lives don’t matter to Blacks killing each other then explain to me why I as a law-abiding White male should care? Hell no they don’t matter. Thug lives do NOT matter.

    Read More
  58. There is much distraction from our most severe problems & the scapegoating of other groups. Of course some groups cause problems such as Islamic terrorism, or border crossing illegal immigrants (which is a economic drain on this nation). But when you triage & prioritize the problems in this nation, scaled to the disruption it causes, then it is obvious, all the other problems (and other scapegoated groups) do not compare with the current afro american problems in this nation.

    This includes the lunatic fantasies that the police are killing a massive amount of people for no reason, in every community in America, somehow without the rest of us noticing. This conspiracy just helps advance the leftist agenda: If you diminish the justified use of force by the police, you also diminish your own. Leftist attack police use of force because they want no one to be able to use force to defend themselves, and these nonsense conspiracy theories just enable the MSM to accomplish that goal.

    Illegal immigrants may cause an economic drain upon this nation, but if our govt could regain some fortitude and common sense, this problem can be addressed and eventually solved. The deaths by Islamic terrorism, in this country, is small in comparison to the amount of deaths caused by afro americans every year in this nation. The MSM distracts us from our primary problem, and also encourages so called black rage.

    We need to keep our eye on the ball, which is the problem of afro american racial balkanization, & violence, and a declining economy that is accumulating unserviceable debt. And one of the main reasons why we have this unserviceable debt, at multiple govt levels, is afro american entitlements.
    Yet with all of our efforts their racial animosity against this country, that provided them so much, grows. I see no reversing this trend line. The more afros complain the more we pander. Government cuts their traditional functions while increasing benefits to afros. And afro american balkanization continues to grow.

    If you keep going in a certain direction, we will eventually get there. We will eventually default, and have widespread economic disruption. We will see austerity as a result. We could see failed state circumstances in many municipalities/counties/state level. The Afros we spoiled will not accept less, when we were always promising more, and telling them it is never enough. As a result you will see violent racial balkanization in this nation.

    Many do not want to acknowledge this because it is too unpleasant
    To some this is inconceivable, because of their own normalcy bias. But human history teaches us that prosperity is not a normal human condition – – hardship is!

    Read More
  59. @another fred

    But the $64,000.00 question is why do black lives only matter when they are shot by white police officers when blacks kill other blacks 93% of the time? That is a question BLM, their many media allies and white libtards refuse to answer.
     
    The answer is very simple, the "Black Lives" are being used for political advantage. Neither "Justice" nor "Truth" have the least bit to do with the matter.

    /not to say that those on the right are pure hearted

    /not to say that those on the right are pure hearted

    You’ll have to explain what you mean. The right is more pure hearted than the anti-white left. The facts favor “the right” and our case against them is much stronger than their flimsy case against whites.

    Read More
  60. @utu
    It might be incomplete number but that is what we got. It is close what Guardian project reports:

    http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2015/jun/01/the-counted-police-killings-us-database

    They say it is 306 for Blacks and 581 for Whites.

    But you missed the most important part of my comment that Whites are 1.9 times more likely to be killed than Blacks per the same number of arrests leading to incarceration. The number of arrests leading to incarceration is a good surrogate for the number of interactions with police. What is wrong with Whites or police that Whites are killed 1.9 more frequently than Blacks per the same number of interactions with police?

    No, I didn’t miss anything. If you have followed my posts you know that I have repeatedly pointed out that cops murder more unarmed whites every year than blacks. I don’t think it is racial, I think cops are trained to murder people. Paul Roberts agrees.

    Read More
  61. Blacks protest against police brutality but Whites rarely do even though Whites when having an encounter with police are 1.9 times more likely to be killed than Blacks? What’s wrong with Whites? Why do they accept the brutality of American police whose rules of engagement are like that of occupational forces in Gaza or Iraq? American Whites are pathetic. A suicide cult? Must be. It shows in longevity statistics for white lower class males.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mr. meener
    whites are cowards and it will go down in history that the most heavily armed people in human history were genocided without firing a shot. gun owners worship cops. stupid cowardly whites will probably shoot each other over food instead of seeing that it is the govt that wants them eradicated from earth
  62. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Greasy William

    NAACP was founded and still funded by Zionist Jews
     
    Enough with the Jews, already! We want to complain about blacks in peace.

    Fucking HILARIOUS line.

    And just to let you know, this is coming from someone that doesn’t agree with the sentiment, so you KNOW that it’s gotta be funny. Thanks for the laugh :)

    Read More
  63. Hillary’s and Obama’s policies unleashed anarchy and sectarian violence in Libya and Syria. Now they are inciting a sectarian conflagration in the United States.

    Read More
  64. Why is she pandering to the one demographic that will rubber stamp her en masse in November anyway?

    I’m just not seeing the strategy here.

    Read More
  65. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    An entire day at the Democrat Convention next week in Philadelphia is being dedicated to allowing black mothers of would-be cop killers the chance to address the nation on behalf of their dead black sons… The Mothers of the Movement participating include Gwen Carr, mother of Eric Garner; Sybrina Fulton, mother of Trayvon Martin;

    Excuse me but where exactly do you get off spouting false racist bullshit like “black mothers of would be cop killers”? How exactly is Eric Garner, who was choked to death with an illegal choke-hold with his hands up for selling cigarettes, a “would-be cop killer”? And how exactly is Trayvon Martin, who was stalked by a lunatic that he got into a fight with for walking in Trayvon’s OWN neighborhood, a “would-be cop killer”? For someone that seems so offended by others painting in false broad strokes, you should be ashamed of yourself, Kersey, for writing such rubbish.

    All of this should be enough for Americans to forever tune out the insanity of what I’ve dubbed Black-Run America (BRA)—or what VDARE.com has succinctly called the Minority-Occupation Government

    As Rehmat and Eileen Kuch expressed in their posts much more eloquently than I will, you have to be a goddamn full-blown idiot to think that Zionist-Run America should be called BRA.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Greasy William

    you have to be a goddamn full-blown idiot to think that Zionist-Run America should be called BRA.
     
    You must not be familiar with BRA. BRA does not mean that blacks actually control America, on the contrary, Kersey has frequently described America's black community as marginalized and politically powerless. Rather the idea of BRA is that America is run with a focus on blacks and black issues.

    Keep in mind that Kersey introduced his BRA thesis in 2009 when the concept was much more tenable. Since then blacks seem to have really been displaced on the victim totem poll by gays, latinos, muslims and now even trannies. But the name has stuck.
    , @mr. meener
    and you are even dumber not to see that jews use the negroes as their army to destroy USA and thru brainwashing (with an enema) stupid white girls to breed with them. so they force intergration with busing affirmative blaction quota hires putting them in colleges with 7th grade reading level and they all got white gfs
  66. @CCZ
    But sometimes the irony is acute and perhaps even true “social justice” prevails.

    From the news:

    With 55 shootings and five deaths, the weekend in Chicago was particularly bloody, so much so that Sunday marked itself as having the most shootings in a single day in over a year.

    First Deputy Superintendent John Escalante commented on one of the deaths, saying that in a particular way the justice system failed the victim.

    Raygene Jackson, 38, was murdered on Sunday, but according to Escalante, he should have still been safely in jail and not walking the streets.

    “I don’t mean to victimize this victim any further, this man lost his life,” Escalante said. “But our frustration is, in 1995 he was sentenced to 46 years in the Illinois Department of Corrections for a murder. In 1995. He was paroled last year. How and why he’s on the street, I don’t know. But if he was still serving his sentence, he wouldn’t be a murder victim right now.”

    Soooooooooo…liberals are freeing murderous blacks to commit the capital punishment on each other that SJWs can’t bring themselves to approve?

    Hard to feel bad about that.

    Read More
  67. @Junior

    An entire day at the Democrat Convention next week in Philadelphia is being dedicated to allowing black mothers of would-be cop killers the chance to address the nation on behalf of their dead black sons... The Mothers of the Movement participating include Gwen Carr, mother of Eric Garner; Sybrina Fulton, mother of Trayvon Martin;
     
    Excuse me but where exactly do you get off spouting false racist bullshit like "black mothers of would be cop killers"? How exactly is Eric Garner, who was choked to death with an illegal choke-hold with his hands up for selling cigarettes, a "would-be cop killer"? And how exactly is Trayvon Martin, who was stalked by a lunatic that he got into a fight with for walking in Trayvon's OWN neighborhood, a "would-be cop killer"? For someone that seems so offended by others painting in false broad strokes, you should be ashamed of yourself, Kersey, for writing such rubbish.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfXqYwyzQpM

    All of this should be enough for Americans to forever tune out the insanity of what I’ve dubbed Black-Run America (BRA)—or what VDARE.com has succinctly called the Minority-Occupation Government
     
    As Rehmat and Eileen Kuch expressed in their posts much more eloquently than I will, you have to be a goddamn full-blown idiot to think that Zionist-Run America should be called BRA.

    you have to be a goddamn full-blown idiot to think that Zionist-Run America should be called BRA.

    You must not be familiar with BRA. BRA does not mean that blacks actually control America, on the contrary, Kersey has frequently described America’s black community as marginalized and politically powerless. Rather the idea of BRA is that America is run with a focus on blacks and black issues.

    Keep in mind that Kersey introduced his BRA thesis in 2009 when the concept was much more tenable. Since then blacks seem to have really been displaced on the victim totem poll by gays, latinos, muslims and now even trannies. But the name has stuck.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Junior

    Rather the idea of BRA is that America is run with a focus on blacks and black issues.
     
    I see what you mean but I feel that Kersey is race-baiting and playing right into their divide-and-conquer tactics. If he means Black-Focused America then he should call it BFA not BRA. It is exactly the same thing that the race-baiting BLM movement is doing by not calling itself All Lives Matter. With his misnaming he is pushing a false narrative that only results in distraction from the real jailers of this country that are trying to have us fighting amongst ourselves like prisoners in a prison yard. Our slave-masters want us pointing the finger of blame at each other instead of them for the problems that they are causing through their control of media, finance, the judicial system, and corrupted politicians.

    Distracting while they divide and conquer, that is exactly what Kersey is helping the Zionists do. The only real question is whether he is doing it intentionally or doesn't even realize that he's doing it.
  68. Even Hillary’s white folks are acting thuggish.

    Pittsburgh Action News:
    South Union Township, Pa. – Deanna Vicites, who is charged with shooting her husband, Fayette County Commissioner Vincent Vicites, resigned as a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, according to the Pennsylvania Democratic Party

    Deanna Marie Vicites is supposed to be in Philadelphia for the Democratic National Convention, but she’s in the Fayette County Jail — accused of trying to kill her husband, Vincent Vicites. Fayette County Commissioner Vincent Vicites remains hospitalized after being shot, allegedly by his wife, and the district attorney said any talk of it being an accidental shooting is false.

    The party listed Deanna Vicites as an at-large delegate in a June 11 press release announcing its delegation to the national convention to be held in Philadelphia July 25-28.

    She was arrested Sunday night after she was accused of shooting her husband at 1 a.m. Sunday. She was charged with attempted homicide and simple assault among other charges. District Attorney Rich Bower said the shooting was “not accidental.”

    Read More
  69. @utu
    Blacks protest against police brutality but Whites rarely do even though Whites when having an encounter with police are 1.9 times more likely to be killed than Blacks? What's wrong with Whites? Why do they accept the brutality of American police whose rules of engagement are like that of occupational forces in Gaza or Iraq? American Whites are pathetic. A suicide cult? Must be. It shows in longevity statistics for white lower class males.

    whites are cowards and it will go down in history that the most heavily armed people in human history were genocided without firing a shot. gun owners worship cops. stupid cowardly whites will probably shoot each other over food instead of seeing that it is the govt that wants them eradicated from earth

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    "[White] gun owners worship cops" - No the ones that have confrontations with police. They are 1.9 more likely to be killed than Blacks, so they must be less submissive than Blacks. However the majority of Whites do not feel solidarity with the "criminal" Whites, while the opposite is true among Blacks.
  70. @Junior

    An entire day at the Democrat Convention next week in Philadelphia is being dedicated to allowing black mothers of would-be cop killers the chance to address the nation on behalf of their dead black sons... The Mothers of the Movement participating include Gwen Carr, mother of Eric Garner; Sybrina Fulton, mother of Trayvon Martin;
     
    Excuse me but where exactly do you get off spouting false racist bullshit like "black mothers of would be cop killers"? How exactly is Eric Garner, who was choked to death with an illegal choke-hold with his hands up for selling cigarettes, a "would-be cop killer"? And how exactly is Trayvon Martin, who was stalked by a lunatic that he got into a fight with for walking in Trayvon's OWN neighborhood, a "would-be cop killer"? For someone that seems so offended by others painting in false broad strokes, you should be ashamed of yourself, Kersey, for writing such rubbish.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfXqYwyzQpM

    All of this should be enough for Americans to forever tune out the insanity of what I’ve dubbed Black-Run America (BRA)—or what VDARE.com has succinctly called the Minority-Occupation Government
     
    As Rehmat and Eileen Kuch expressed in their posts much more eloquently than I will, you have to be a goddamn full-blown idiot to think that Zionist-Run America should be called BRA.

    and you are even dumber not to see that jews use the negroes as their army to destroy USA and thru brainwashing (with an enema) stupid white girls to breed with them. so they force intergration with busing affirmative blaction quota hires putting them in colleges with 7th grade reading level and they all got white gfs

    Read More
    • Replies: @Junior

    and you are even dumber not to see that jews use the negroes as their army to destroy USA and thru brainwashing
     
    Wake up, mr. meener. The Zionists are using ALL of us as their army to destroy the USA.

    But maybe you're right and the problem is that I need to adjust the contrast settings on my TV because the people giving all the standing ovations in the video below are actually all black and I just didn't realize it. My damn TV must be on the fritz again.

    Wake up.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KMVhb57RqI
    , @Junior
    Or maybe you don't want to wake up and would rather stay in your ignorant sleep. In which case, please allow me to help you get back to your slumber with some appropriate music.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNnIJuWhOUQ
  71. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Greasy William

    you have to be a goddamn full-blown idiot to think that Zionist-Run America should be called BRA.
     
    You must not be familiar with BRA. BRA does not mean that blacks actually control America, on the contrary, Kersey has frequently described America's black community as marginalized and politically powerless. Rather the idea of BRA is that America is run with a focus on blacks and black issues.

    Keep in mind that Kersey introduced his BRA thesis in 2009 when the concept was much more tenable. Since then blacks seem to have really been displaced on the victim totem poll by gays, latinos, muslims and now even trannies. But the name has stuck.

    Rather the idea of BRA is that America is run with a focus on blacks and black issues.

    I see what you mean but I feel that Kersey is race-baiting and playing right into their divide-and-conquer tactics. If he means Black-Focused America then he should call it BFA not BRA. It is exactly the same thing that the race-baiting BLM movement is doing by not calling itself All Lives Matter. With his misnaming he is pushing a false narrative that only results in distraction from the real jailers of this country that are trying to have us fighting amongst ourselves like prisoners in a prison yard. Our slave-masters want us pointing the finger of blame at each other instead of them for the problems that they are causing through their control of media, finance, the judicial system, and corrupted politicians.

    Distracting while they divide and conquer, that is exactly what Kersey is helping the Zionists do. The only real question is whether he is doing it intentionally or doesn’t even realize that he’s doing it.

    Read More
  72. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @mr. meener
    and you are even dumber not to see that jews use the negroes as their army to destroy USA and thru brainwashing (with an enema) stupid white girls to breed with them. so they force intergration with busing affirmative blaction quota hires putting them in colleges with 7th grade reading level and they all got white gfs

    and you are even dumber not to see that jews use the negroes as their army to destroy USA and thru brainwashing

    Wake up, mr. meener. The Zionists are using ALL of us as their army to destroy the USA.

    But maybe you’re right and the problem is that I need to adjust the contrast settings on my TV because the people giving all the standing ovations in the video below are actually all black and I just didn’t realize it. My damn TV must be on the fritz again.

    Wake up.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mr. meener
    you are just to dense to understand what I said so have an adult read it to you. do you see politicians burning cities down? they have their role and so does the negro. but the permanent genocide of whites will be thru negroes breeding with whites. can white pols do that? jews severly reduced whites thru the 2 world wars and interbreeding is the final solution
  73. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @mr. meener
    and you are even dumber not to see that jews use the negroes as their army to destroy USA and thru brainwashing (with an enema) stupid white girls to breed with them. so they force intergration with busing affirmative blaction quota hires putting them in colleges with 7th grade reading level and they all got white gfs

    Or maybe you don’t want to wake up and would rather stay in your ignorant sleep. In which case, please allow me to help you get back to your slumber with some appropriate music.

    Read More
  74. @mr. meener
    whites are cowards and it will go down in history that the most heavily armed people in human history were genocided without firing a shot. gun owners worship cops. stupid cowardly whites will probably shoot each other over food instead of seeing that it is the govt that wants them eradicated from earth

    “[White] gun owners worship cops” – No the ones that have confrontations with police. They are 1.9 more likely to be killed than Blacks, so they must be less submissive than Blacks. However the majority of Whites do not feel solidarity with the “criminal” Whites, while the opposite is true among Blacks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mr. meener
    go on FB or disqs comments when a cop is shot or a unarmed man is shot and you will see. I have been thrown of all the gun forums for slightly going against the police state. I think most gun forums are run by the BATF anyway
    , @joef
    Majority of whites are not against the police, because they are against the criminals more. If you lived in a place like Chicago, St Louis, Bronx, Brooklyn, Newark, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New Orleans, Los Angeles, Camden Nj, Cleveland, etc etc, you would understand. But if you live in cupcake land you won't. Even for the whites in these areas who do not care for cops, there is a grudging respect for them because ghetto cops stood solo foot posts outgunned and out manned (dealing with thugs armed with machine pistols while only armed with six shot revolvers): they truly had to fight alone.

    There are many real police state problems such as:
    - - Ubiquitous use of police road blocks;
    - - Overuse of SWAT teams by small overeager police departments for non life threatening events;
    - - Traffic ticket quotas
    - - Stop & Seize civil forfeitures.
    - - The criminalization, by our legislature, of innocuous acts

    Now
    - - Are you saying that all police shootings involve completely innocent people?
    - - Are you saying that no one commits any violent felonies that require police intervention?
    - - Are you saying that you rather criminals are not stopped so they can continue to prey upon your fellow citizens (some of which are unable to defend themselves because of sex/age/disability)?
    - - Are you saying that all persons shot by the police are unarmed?
    - - If so have you ever been, or know someone who has been, on a one on one violent confrontation with an unarmed man who is trying to kill you (do you understand that kind of violent dynamic)?
    - - Are you saying that there are no circumstances where police are allowed to defend themselves ?
    - - Where did you get your figures (is the source bogus)?
    - - Are you saying all officers are accountable for all other officers, even if they do not know them, know of the incident involved, or work in the same geographic area (or police dept).
    - - Are you saying that we should incorporate the leftist concept of collective guilt against all police officers for the bad actions of some other police officers?
    - - Are you examining each event by a case by case basis or are you just making general statement that fits into an ideology?


    The problem with anarcho capitalist is that they are utopian ideologues, just like marxist. They use the same propaganda techniques, against the police, that leftist would use. It usually goes something like this: I have personal animosity against the police (in my local area), therefore they are all random killers of innocent people. Not exactly a logical argument that is full of objectivity.

    Now just because one obnoxious cop gave you a traffic ticket, and you believe it was equivalent to a trip to the gulag, does not make every other cop in the world responsible for it, nor does that mean they are routinely shooting innocent people like you suggested.

    Do you understand that, in many laws, the police use of force is equivalent to civilian use of force; & if you say police are not allowed to defend themselves in deadly force situations, you are making the case for leftist elites to deny all of us our right to protect ourselves with deadly force. What makes you believe that the leftist will deny the police use of force but allow you to use it when necessary? If you live in a violent urban area you are cognizant of that fact. Unfortunately you rather help contribute to leftist propaganda (guided by irrational hatred).

  75. @utu
    "[White] gun owners worship cops" - No the ones that have confrontations with police. They are 1.9 more likely to be killed than Blacks, so they must be less submissive than Blacks. However the majority of Whites do not feel solidarity with the "criminal" Whites, while the opposite is true among Blacks.

    go on FB or disqs comments when a cop is shot or a unarmed man is shot and you will see. I have been thrown of all the gun forums for slightly going against the police state. I think most gun forums are run by the BATF anyway

    Read More
  76. @Junior

    and you are even dumber not to see that jews use the negroes as their army to destroy USA and thru brainwashing
     
    Wake up, mr. meener. The Zionists are using ALL of us as their army to destroy the USA.

    But maybe you're right and the problem is that I need to adjust the contrast settings on my TV because the people giving all the standing ovations in the video below are actually all black and I just didn't realize it. My damn TV must be on the fritz again.

    Wake up.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KMVhb57RqI

    you are just to dense to understand what I said so have an adult read it to you. do you see politicians burning cities down? they have their role and so does the negro. but the permanent genocide of whites will be thru negroes breeding with whites. can white pols do that? jews severly reduced whites thru the 2 world wars and interbreeding is the final solution

    Read More
    • Replies: @Junior

    but the permanent genocide of whites will be thru negroes breeding with whites... interbreeding is the final solution
     
    You clearly have no idea what is going on so let me clue you in, Fellow Nee. The plan is for the depopulation and genocide of ALL races so that it will be easier to control the masses of "useless eaters" under a One World Governance. They have you thinking that they are targeting one race and pointing the finger at it distracted while they are going after EVERYBODY. They do it through war, poisoning of our water and food supply, manufactured diseases and viruses, suppression of cures, famine... Aw hell, here's an article that lists most of them so that I don't have to spend an hour trying to remember them all:

    There are many means and methods of depopulation that are being employed today, the 3 primary of which include; unsustainable/exploitative international development, which leads to massive hunger, starvation and famine worldwide (at least 40 million deaths annually), the fomentation of war, hatred and military procurements throughout the nations leading to millions of deaths worldwide, and finially, the creation and spread of infectious diseases leading to global pandemic, plague and pestilence on an unprecedented scale.

    Other methods used include; the build-up and use of nuclear, chemical and biological agents, weapons and warfare, the poisoning and contamination of the planet's food and water supplies, the introduction and use of deadly pharmacuetical drugs in society, weather modification and the triggering of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis through electromagnetic psychotronic weapons both on Earth and in space, the promotion of homosexuality to limit population growth and spread the deadly AIDS virus, forced sterilization in countries such as China, forced vaccinations, abortion, euthanasia etc...
     
    http://rense.com/general64/pordc.htm

    If your suggested method of how they are implementing a final solution through "interbreeding" were true, then how do you account for Planned Parenthood being the leading cause of death for Blacks? You would think that they would be trying to save as many Black Babies as possible to carry out your "interbreeding final solution", wouldn't you?


    you are just to dense to understand what I said so have an adult read it to you. do you see politicians burning cities down? they have their role and so does the negro.
     
    No, I haven't seen politicians burning cities down, but I'll tell you who I have ALSO seen burning cities down besides Blacks...

    During the 1863 New York City draft riots, white people ran amok, killing black Americans and destroying the African-American community’s churches, orphanages, businesses and schools.

    In 1921, over a 24-hour time period, whites destroyed the prosperous black community in Tulsa, Oklahoma. White rioters used machine guns and dropped bombs (in what may be one of the first recorded uses of a plane for that purpose) on the black community. Conservative estimates suggest that at least several hundred black people were killed.

    In East Saint Louis, whites engaged in a pogrom against the black community. Like Chicago, this was part of the “Red Summers” in which whites attempted to reassert their control and dominance over the black community in the aftermath of World War I.

    Scholars such as James Loewen estimate that as many as 3,000 black communities were “ethnically cleansed” by white violence and other means of intimidation

    Historian Gregory Downs has suggested that as many as 50,000 black Americans were killed by white racial terrorism in the 30 years following the end of the American Civil War. This total may not even include at least 4,000 blacks who were victims of lynchings by whites across the South and other parts of the United States... By most empirical measures (land taken, people killed and number of occurrences—there were 26 white-on-black race riots during the year 1919 alone)
     

    http://www.salon.com/2015/05/01/white_americas_racial_amnesia_the_sobering_truth_about_our_countrys_race_riots_partner/

    1824 Providence- white mobs attack blacks for refusing to get off sidewalk; destroy 20 buildings in black district.

    1841 Cincinnati-white mobs riot against black dock workers using a cannon, destroying property & killing an unknown number.

    1842-Philadelphia white mobs attack a black parade and riot for 3 days, beating many, looting black homes & burning a church.

    1863 Detroit-after a sensationalist rape trial white mobs riot, beating and killing blacks and burning down some 35 buildings.

    1866 New Orleans- whites attack black political parade outside the Mechanics Institute in New Orleans; 38 killed and 46 wounded.

    1866 Memphis-white mobs riot against black Union soldiers; 46 blacks killed, 5 black women raped, 100 buildings looted & burned

    1868 Louisiana-"Opelousas Massacre" political riots result in over 1000 armed whites massacring perhaps over 100 black opponents

    1870 Laurens, SC- mob of 2500 armed whites riot against local freedman's militia, black officeholders & their white allies.

    1870 Eutaw, Alabama- in political unrest, white mobs spark riots at polling places to terrorize and intimidate black voters.

    1871 Meridian, MS- rioting white mobs kill 30 blacks over several days. local black homes burned along with a black school.

    1873 Colifax, LA- armed white mobs riot against black officeholders, burning courthouse with blacks inside, killing 60 to 150.

    1874 Vicksburg, MS- white citizens, angered by black voters and officeholders, erupt into a riot. 31 people were killed.

    1874 Coushatta, Louisiana- paramilitary White League sparks riot killing some 20 freedmen officeholders and their white allies.

    1874 Liberty Place Riot- in Louisiana 5000 White League members riot against local govt seen favorable to blacks. 40 killed.

    1876 Hamburg, SC- armed white mobs riot in local black district, killing members of black militia and looting the town.

    1898 Wilmington, NC- white mob of 2000 attacks black newspaper, rampaging & looting black district. 15 to 60 blacks killed.

    1898 Phoenix, SC- white mobs riot to stop blacks from voting, killing many prominent blacks, chasing others from their homes.

    1898 Lake City, SC- white mob riots against black postmaster, burning his home, killing him and his infant 1 yr old daughter.

    1906 Atlanta- 10,000 whites rampage thru black Atlanta for 3 days. 40 blacks killed, black property burned, forced to flee city

    1908 Springfield, IL- for two days white mobs riot in black district. 2 blacks killed, 40 homes & 20 businesses destroyed.

    1917 St. Louis- 3000 strong white mob burn & loot black homes & destroy local black business district. 100 to 200 blacks killed.

    1921 Tulsa- white mobs riot in black business district. 10,000 left homeless; 35 blocks destroyed; 800 injured; 25 to 300 killed

    going to end here. not a comprehensive list. Rosewood, Red Summer 1919, Anti-Filipino, Zoot Suit Riots & more left unmentioned.
     

    https://storify.com/pdjeliclark/a-history-of-white-riots-and-race-in-america

    I state these numerous examples of White Riots because although you acknowledge that the Zionist are using the Black Community as a tool, it's quite clear from all your nonsense about "interbreeding" being the problem that you need to be shown that under the right circumstances it could EASILY be the White race being used as a tool by the Zionists for riots instead. You seem to be implying that Rioting is a condition of Race, when it is in fact a condition of circumstances. And Zionists are creating the circumstances for it to happen.

    As I have stated their agenda is to turn each other against ourselves. They WANT race wars. They WANT a Police force that would be angry enough to enforce martial law and overlook the rights of citizens because they have been unjustly maligned through the "media" and Soros sponsored protests. They WANT us distracted into thinking that this is about one race being superior to another. You are furthering their agenda.

    But maybe you’re right and the problem is that I need to adjust the contrast settings on my TV again because the people and gangs rioting in the video I've posted below from a movie based on the Draft Riots are actually all black and I just didn’t realize it. TV must be on the fritz again. Goddamn you Toshiba! If only those Globalism loving Zionist hadn't sent all our factories overseas, maybe I could have bought an American TV that actually works.

    Now, if you don't mind, adults are trying to have a conversation so if you're just going to keep on trying to distract from the truth then please go back to bed.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKJ_OOKQVrU

  77. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @mr. meener
    you are just to dense to understand what I said so have an adult read it to you. do you see politicians burning cities down? they have their role and so does the negro. but the permanent genocide of whites will be thru negroes breeding with whites. can white pols do that? jews severly reduced whites thru the 2 world wars and interbreeding is the final solution

    but the permanent genocide of whites will be thru negroes breeding with whites… interbreeding is the final solution

    You clearly have no idea what is going on so let me clue you in, Fellow Nee. The plan is for the depopulation and genocide of ALL races so that it will be easier to control the masses of “useless eaters” under a One World Governance. They have you thinking that they are targeting one race and pointing the finger at it distracted while they are going after EVERYBODY. They do it through war, poisoning of our water and food supply, manufactured diseases and viruses, suppression of cures, famine… Aw hell, here’s an article that lists most of them so that I don’t have to spend an hour trying to remember them all:

    There are many means and methods of depopulation that are being employed today, the 3 primary of which include; unsustainable/exploitative international development, which leads to massive hunger, starvation and famine worldwide (at least 40 million deaths annually), the fomentation of war, hatred and military procurements throughout the nations leading to millions of deaths worldwide, and finially, the creation and spread of infectious diseases leading to global pandemic, plague and pestilence on an unprecedented scale.

    Other methods used include; the build-up and use of nuclear, chemical and biological agents, weapons and warfare, the poisoning and contamination of the planet’s food and water supplies, the introduction and use of deadly pharmacuetical drugs in society, weather modification and the triggering of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis through electromagnetic psychotronic weapons both on Earth and in space, the promotion of homosexuality to limit population growth and spread the deadly AIDS virus, forced sterilization in countries such as China, forced vaccinations, abortion, euthanasia etc…

    http://rense.com/general64/pordc.htm

    If your suggested method of how they are implementing a final solution through “interbreeding” were true, then how do you account for Planned Parenthood being the leading cause of death for Blacks? You would think that they would be trying to save as many Black Babies as possible to carry out your “interbreeding final solution”, wouldn’t you?

    you are just to dense to understand what I said so have an adult read it to you. do you see politicians burning cities down? they have their role and so does the negro.

    No, I haven’t seen politicians burning cities down, but I’ll tell you who I have ALSO seen burning cities down besides Blacks…

    During the 1863 New York City draft riots, white people ran amok, killing black Americans and destroying the African-American community’s churches, orphanages, businesses and schools.

    In 1921, over a 24-hour time period, whites destroyed the prosperous black community in Tulsa, Oklahoma. White rioters used machine guns and dropped bombs (in what may be one of the first recorded uses of a plane for that purpose) on the black community. Conservative estimates suggest that at least several hundred black people were killed.

    In East Saint Louis, whites engaged in a pogrom against the black community. Like Chicago, this was part of the “Red Summers” in which whites attempted to reassert their control and dominance over the black community in the aftermath of World War I.

    Scholars such as James Loewen estimate that as many as 3,000 black communities were “ethnically cleansed” by white violence and other means of intimidation

    Historian Gregory Downs has suggested that as many as 50,000 black Americans were killed by white racial terrorism in the 30 years following the end of the American Civil War. This total may not even include at least 4,000 blacks who were victims of lynchings by whites across the South and other parts of the United States… By most empirical measures (land taken, people killed and number of occurrences—there were 26 white-on-black race riots during the year 1919 alone)

    http://www.salon.com/2015/05/01/white_americas_racial_amnesia_the_sobering_truth_about_our_countrys_race_riots_partner/

    1824 Providence- white mobs attack blacks for refusing to get off sidewalk; destroy 20 buildings in black district.

    1841 Cincinnati-white mobs riot against black dock workers using a cannon, destroying property & killing an unknown number.

    1842-Philadelphia white mobs attack a black parade and riot for 3 days, beating many, looting black homes & burning a church.

    1863 Detroit-after a sensationalist rape trial white mobs riot, beating and killing blacks and burning down some 35 buildings.

    1866 New Orleans- whites attack black political parade outside the Mechanics Institute in New Orleans; 38 killed and 46 wounded.

    1866 Memphis-white mobs riot against black Union soldiers; 46 blacks killed, 5 black women raped, 100 buildings looted & burned

    1868 Louisiana-”Opelousas Massacre” political riots result in over 1000 armed whites massacring perhaps over 100 black opponents

    1870 Laurens, SC- mob of 2500 armed whites riot against local freedman’s militia, black officeholders & their white allies.

    1870 Eutaw, Alabama- in political unrest, white mobs spark riots at polling places to terrorize and intimidate black voters.

    1871 Meridian, MS- rioting white mobs kill 30 blacks over several days. local black homes burned along with a black school.

    1873 Colifax, LA- armed white mobs riot against black officeholders, burning courthouse with blacks inside, killing 60 to 150.

    1874 Vicksburg, MS- white citizens, angered by black voters and officeholders, erupt into a riot. 31 people were killed.

    1874 Coushatta, Louisiana- paramilitary White League sparks riot killing some 20 freedmen officeholders and their white allies.

    1874 Liberty Place Riot- in Louisiana 5000 White League members riot against local govt seen favorable to blacks. 40 killed.

    1876 Hamburg, SC- armed white mobs riot in local black district, killing members of black militia and looting the town.

    1898 Wilmington, NC- white mob of 2000 attacks black newspaper, rampaging & looting black district. 15 to 60 blacks killed.

    1898 Phoenix, SC- white mobs riot to stop blacks from voting, killing many prominent blacks, chasing others from their homes.

    1898 Lake City, SC- white mob riots against black postmaster, burning his home, killing him and his infant 1 yr old daughter.

    1906 Atlanta- 10,000 whites rampage thru black Atlanta for 3 days. 40 blacks killed, black property burned, forced to flee city

    1908 Springfield, IL- for two days white mobs riot in black district. 2 blacks killed, 40 homes & 20 businesses destroyed.

    1917 St. Louis- 3000 strong white mob burn & loot black homes & destroy local black business district. 100 to 200 blacks killed.

    1921 Tulsa- white mobs riot in black business district. 10,000 left homeless; 35 blocks destroyed; 800 injured; 25 to 300 killed

    going to end here. not a comprehensive list. Rosewood, Red Summer 1919, Anti-Filipino, Zoot Suit Riots & more left unmentioned.

    https://storify.com/pdjeliclark/a-history-of-white-riots-and-race-in-america

    I state these numerous examples of White Riots because although you acknowledge that the Zionist are using the Black Community as a tool, it’s quite clear from all your nonsense about “interbreeding” being the problem that you need to be shown that under the right circumstances it could EASILY be the White race being used as a tool by the Zionists for riots instead. You seem to be implying that Rioting is a condition of Race, when it is in fact a condition of circumstances. And Zionists are creating the circumstances for it to happen.

    As I have stated their agenda is to turn each other against ourselves. They WANT race wars. They WANT a Police force that would be angry enough to enforce martial law and overlook the rights of citizens because they have been unjustly maligned through the “media” and Soros sponsored protests. They WANT us distracted into thinking that this is about one race being superior to another. You are furthering their agenda.

    But maybe you’re right and the problem is that I need to adjust the contrast settings on my TV again because the people and gangs rioting in the video I’ve posted below from a movie based on the Draft Riots are actually all black and I just didn’t realize it. TV must be on the fritz again. Goddamn you Toshiba! If only those Globalism loving Zionist hadn’t sent all our factories overseas, maybe I could have bought an American TV that actually works.

    Now, if you don’t mind, adults are trying to have a conversation so if you’re just going to keep on trying to distract from the truth then please go back to bed.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKJ_OOKQVrU

    Read More
    • Replies: @mr. meener
    I wish I was around when whites were proud to be white and not around whites who celebrate their genocide. as far as abortion for negroes you must come out of mommies basement. in the cities even in rural south they have 4-8 kids while half the whites have no kids. it is only the white race that is declining in % of world population. you wasted a lot of ink trying to make me feel sorry for negroes but I do not care about them at all. black brown and yellow populations are exploding while whites are declining worlwide. so instead of being a pompous blowhard look up those stats it is the whites being eradicated
    , @KenH

    I state these numerous examples of White Riots because although you acknowledge that the Zionist are using the Black Community as a tool, it’s quite clear from all your nonsense about “interbreeding” being the problem that you need to be shown that under the right circumstances it could EASILY be the White race being used as a tool by the Zionists for riots instead. You seem to be implying that Rioting is a condition of Race, when it is in fact a condition of circumstances. And Zionists are creating the circumstances for it to happen.
     
    Most of the white riots you cited happened 100 or more years ago and were not orchestrated by "Zionists" which is a term used by people who are too cowardly to say Jews. The citations also lack context and imply that whites were mindless savages just like the contemporary negro once upon a time. The white riots took place long before the white man became brainwashed and denatured and were often in retaliation for violence and depredations committed by the blacks. The purpose was usually to deter blacks from further bad behavior against whites which almost always had the desired effect.

    Blacks, otoh, always burn down their own neighborhoods and business districts when they feel whitey has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism.

    True, there are Zionist machinations today, but if you're trying to argue that without them blacks and whites would be getting along wonderfully that's totally false evidenced by the violent conflict that regularly occurred between the two races long before the Zionist stranglehold on much of the white, Western world. Racial differences are real, not artificial, and they are easy to exploit by the string pullers.

    The only thing that can bring peace and stability is the racial partition of the USA.

  78. @Junior

    but the permanent genocide of whites will be thru negroes breeding with whites... interbreeding is the final solution
     
    You clearly have no idea what is going on so let me clue you in, Fellow Nee. The plan is for the depopulation and genocide of ALL races so that it will be easier to control the masses of "useless eaters" under a One World Governance. They have you thinking that they are targeting one race and pointing the finger at it distracted while they are going after EVERYBODY. They do it through war, poisoning of our water and food supply, manufactured diseases and viruses, suppression of cures, famine... Aw hell, here's an article that lists most of them so that I don't have to spend an hour trying to remember them all:

    There are many means and methods of depopulation that are being employed today, the 3 primary of which include; unsustainable/exploitative international development, which leads to massive hunger, starvation and famine worldwide (at least 40 million deaths annually), the fomentation of war, hatred and military procurements throughout the nations leading to millions of deaths worldwide, and finially, the creation and spread of infectious diseases leading to global pandemic, plague and pestilence on an unprecedented scale.

    Other methods used include; the build-up and use of nuclear, chemical and biological agents, weapons and warfare, the poisoning and contamination of the planet's food and water supplies, the introduction and use of deadly pharmacuetical drugs in society, weather modification and the triggering of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis through electromagnetic psychotronic weapons both on Earth and in space, the promotion of homosexuality to limit population growth and spread the deadly AIDS virus, forced sterilization in countries such as China, forced vaccinations, abortion, euthanasia etc...
     
    http://rense.com/general64/pordc.htm

    If your suggested method of how they are implementing a final solution through "interbreeding" were true, then how do you account for Planned Parenthood being the leading cause of death for Blacks? You would think that they would be trying to save as many Black Babies as possible to carry out your "interbreeding final solution", wouldn't you?


    you are just to dense to understand what I said so have an adult read it to you. do you see politicians burning cities down? they have their role and so does the negro.
     
    No, I haven't seen politicians burning cities down, but I'll tell you who I have ALSO seen burning cities down besides Blacks...

    During the 1863 New York City draft riots, white people ran amok, killing black Americans and destroying the African-American community’s churches, orphanages, businesses and schools.

    In 1921, over a 24-hour time period, whites destroyed the prosperous black community in Tulsa, Oklahoma. White rioters used machine guns and dropped bombs (in what may be one of the first recorded uses of a plane for that purpose) on the black community. Conservative estimates suggest that at least several hundred black people were killed.

    In East Saint Louis, whites engaged in a pogrom against the black community. Like Chicago, this was part of the “Red Summers” in which whites attempted to reassert their control and dominance over the black community in the aftermath of World War I.

    Scholars such as James Loewen estimate that as many as 3,000 black communities were “ethnically cleansed” by white violence and other means of intimidation

    Historian Gregory Downs has suggested that as many as 50,000 black Americans were killed by white racial terrorism in the 30 years following the end of the American Civil War. This total may not even include at least 4,000 blacks who were victims of lynchings by whites across the South and other parts of the United States... By most empirical measures (land taken, people killed and number of occurrences—there were 26 white-on-black race riots during the year 1919 alone)
     

    http://www.salon.com/2015/05/01/white_americas_racial_amnesia_the_sobering_truth_about_our_countrys_race_riots_partner/

    1824 Providence- white mobs attack blacks for refusing to get off sidewalk; destroy 20 buildings in black district.

    1841 Cincinnati-white mobs riot against black dock workers using a cannon, destroying property & killing an unknown number.

    1842-Philadelphia white mobs attack a black parade and riot for 3 days, beating many, looting black homes & burning a church.

    1863 Detroit-after a sensationalist rape trial white mobs riot, beating and killing blacks and burning down some 35 buildings.

    1866 New Orleans- whites attack black political parade outside the Mechanics Institute in New Orleans; 38 killed and 46 wounded.

    1866 Memphis-white mobs riot against black Union soldiers; 46 blacks killed, 5 black women raped, 100 buildings looted & burned

    1868 Louisiana-"Opelousas Massacre" political riots result in over 1000 armed whites massacring perhaps over 100 black opponents

    1870 Laurens, SC- mob of 2500 armed whites riot against local freedman's militia, black officeholders & their white allies.

    1870 Eutaw, Alabama- in political unrest, white mobs spark riots at polling places to terrorize and intimidate black voters.

    1871 Meridian, MS- rioting white mobs kill 30 blacks over several days. local black homes burned along with a black school.

    1873 Colifax, LA- armed white mobs riot against black officeholders, burning courthouse with blacks inside, killing 60 to 150.

    1874 Vicksburg, MS- white citizens, angered by black voters and officeholders, erupt into a riot. 31 people were killed.

    1874 Coushatta, Louisiana- paramilitary White League sparks riot killing some 20 freedmen officeholders and their white allies.

    1874 Liberty Place Riot- in Louisiana 5000 White League members riot against local govt seen favorable to blacks. 40 killed.

    1876 Hamburg, SC- armed white mobs riot in local black district, killing members of black militia and looting the town.

    1898 Wilmington, NC- white mob of 2000 attacks black newspaper, rampaging & looting black district. 15 to 60 blacks killed.

    1898 Phoenix, SC- white mobs riot to stop blacks from voting, killing many prominent blacks, chasing others from their homes.

    1898 Lake City, SC- white mob riots against black postmaster, burning his home, killing him and his infant 1 yr old daughter.

    1906 Atlanta- 10,000 whites rampage thru black Atlanta for 3 days. 40 blacks killed, black property burned, forced to flee city

    1908 Springfield, IL- for two days white mobs riot in black district. 2 blacks killed, 40 homes & 20 businesses destroyed.

    1917 St. Louis- 3000 strong white mob burn & loot black homes & destroy local black business district. 100 to 200 blacks killed.

    1921 Tulsa- white mobs riot in black business district. 10,000 left homeless; 35 blocks destroyed; 800 injured; 25 to 300 killed

    going to end here. not a comprehensive list. Rosewood, Red Summer 1919, Anti-Filipino, Zoot Suit Riots & more left unmentioned.
     

    https://storify.com/pdjeliclark/a-history-of-white-riots-and-race-in-america

    I state these numerous examples of White Riots because although you acknowledge that the Zionist are using the Black Community as a tool, it's quite clear from all your nonsense about "interbreeding" being the problem that you need to be shown that under the right circumstances it could EASILY be the White race being used as a tool by the Zionists for riots instead. You seem to be implying that Rioting is a condition of Race, when it is in fact a condition of circumstances. And Zionists are creating the circumstances for it to happen.

    As I have stated their agenda is to turn each other against ourselves. They WANT race wars. They WANT a Police force that would be angry enough to enforce martial law and overlook the rights of citizens because they have been unjustly maligned through the "media" and Soros sponsored protests. They WANT us distracted into thinking that this is about one race being superior to another. You are furthering their agenda.

    But maybe you’re right and the problem is that I need to adjust the contrast settings on my TV again because the people and gangs rioting in the video I've posted below from a movie based on the Draft Riots are actually all black and I just didn’t realize it. TV must be on the fritz again. Goddamn you Toshiba! If only those Globalism loving Zionist hadn't sent all our factories overseas, maybe I could have bought an American TV that actually works.

    Now, if you don't mind, adults are trying to have a conversation so if you're just going to keep on trying to distract from the truth then please go back to bed.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKJ_OOKQVrU

    I wish I was around when whites were proud to be white and not around whites who celebrate their genocide. as far as abortion for negroes you must come out of mommies basement. in the cities even in rural south they have 4-8 kids while half the whites have no kids. it is only the white race that is declining in % of world population. you wasted a lot of ink trying to make me feel sorry for negroes but I do not care about them at all. black brown and yellow populations are exploding while whites are declining worlwide. so instead of being a pompous blowhard look up those stats it is the whites being eradicated

    Read More
    • Replies: @Junior
    Well, you're certainly right about one thing... I can be a pompous blowhard. ;)

    All I'm trying to say is that I think that if we don't all push back together as Americans against these Globalist "Elite" and their divide-and-conquer agenda, we don't have a chance of stopping them. Not as White-Americans, African-Americans, Chinese-Americans, etc., but just as AMERICANS first and foremost.

    United we stand. Divided we can kiss our ass goodbye.

    I hope that you at least consider it.
  79. @utu
    "[White] gun owners worship cops" - No the ones that have confrontations with police. They are 1.9 more likely to be killed than Blacks, so they must be less submissive than Blacks. However the majority of Whites do not feel solidarity with the "criminal" Whites, while the opposite is true among Blacks.

    Majority of whites are not against the police, because they are against the criminals more. If you lived in a place like Chicago, St Louis, Bronx, Brooklyn, Newark, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New Orleans, Los Angeles, Camden Nj, Cleveland, etc etc, you would understand. But if you live in cupcake land you won’t. Even for the whites in these areas who do not care for cops, there is a grudging respect for them because ghetto cops stood solo foot posts outgunned and out manned (dealing with thugs armed with machine pistols while only armed with six shot revolvers): they truly had to fight alone.

    There are many real police state problems such as:
    - – Ubiquitous use of police road blocks;
    - – Overuse of SWAT teams by small overeager police departments for non life threatening events;
    - – Traffic ticket quotas
    - – Stop & Seize civil forfeitures.
    - – The criminalization, by our legislature, of innocuous acts

    Now
    - – Are you saying that all police shootings involve completely innocent people?
    - – Are you saying that no one commits any violent felonies that require police intervention?
    - – Are you saying that you rather criminals are not stopped so they can continue to prey upon your fellow citizens (some of which are unable to defend themselves because of sex/age/disability)?
    - – Are you saying that all persons shot by the police are unarmed?
    - – If so have you ever been, or know someone who has been, on a one on one violent confrontation with an unarmed man who is trying to kill you (do you understand that kind of violent dynamic)?
    - – Are you saying that there are no circumstances where police are allowed to defend themselves ?
    - – Where did you get your figures (is the source bogus)?
    - – Are you saying all officers are accountable for all other officers, even if they do not know them, know of the incident involved, or work in the same geographic area (or police dept).
    - – Are you saying that we should incorporate the leftist concept of collective guilt against all police officers for the bad actions of some other police officers?
    - – Are you examining each event by a case by case basis or are you just making general statement that fits into an ideology?

    The problem with anarcho capitalist is that they are utopian ideologues, just like marxist. They use the same propaganda techniques, against the police, that leftist would use. It usually goes something like this: I have personal animosity against the police (in my local area), therefore they are all random killers of innocent people. Not exactly a logical argument that is full of objectivity.

    Now just because one obnoxious cop gave you a traffic ticket, and you believe it was equivalent to a trip to the gulag, does not make every other cop in the world responsible for it, nor does that mean they are routinely shooting innocent people like you suggested.

    Do you understand that, in many laws, the police use of force is equivalent to civilian use of force; & if you say police are not allowed to defend themselves in deadly force situations, you are making the case for leftist elites to deny all of us our right to protect ourselves with deadly force. What makes you believe that the leftist will deny the police use of force but allow you to use it when necessary? If you live in a violent urban area you are cognizant of that fact. Unfortunately you rather help contribute to leftist propaganda (guided by irrational hatred).

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    "Unfortunately you rather help contribute to leftist propaganda (guided by irrational hatred)." - My thinking is guided by what is right or what is wrong and what is true or not true. Whether truth helps this or that propaganda is for me irrelevant and it should be for everybody so we would not have to deal with propaganda based on lies.

    "Where did you get your figures (is the source bogus)?" I found several sources. For instance http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2015/jun/01/the-counted-police-killings-us-database tells me that in 2015 581 Whites were killed and 306 Blacks were killed by police. These numbers when adjusted for population are 2.93 Whites/million 7.66 Blacks/million. This means that Black are 2.61 times more likely to be killed by police than Whites. This is not surprising because we know how much higher is criminal behavior among Blacks that leads to more frequent interactions with police. So I asked the question about number of killings per interaction with police. What I found was totally surprising to me that frequency of killings of Whites per interaction with police is 1.947 TIMES HIGHER than for for Blacks. This factor I obtained as follows: I do not know the number of interactions with police in each population but I do know prison population in the US which is 39% non-Hispanic white and 40% black. These two numbers I use as the surrogate (a proxy) for the number of interactions with police. Actually these two numbers (39 and 40) are directly proportional to the numbers of interactions with police leading to incarceration. Then I calculate (581/39)/(306/40)=1.947. This means that white person is 1.947 times more likely to be killed by police during interaction with police than a black person.

    Does it mean that Blacks when dealing with police are actually more submissive because they are killed at 1.947 lower rate?

    Does it mean that police when dealing with Blacks actually shows larger restrain that with Whites?

    Explain to me why Whites are killed almost twice as often as Blacks when interacting with police?

    Is it possible that police shows larger restrain when dealing with Blacks because Blacks actually speak for their own and get media coverage when a killing that they perceive as unjustified happens? So police is less likely to get away with murder when the victim is black?

    Does it mean that Whites do not care when other Whites are killed by police and consider all killings justified? Does it mean that Whites are happy or pretend to be happy with their police even though the police kills Whites at 1.947 higher rate than Blacks because... for instance because Whites are cucks who are afraid to face the truth about American police and would not want to aid what they perceive as the left wing propaganda that criticize American police? Whites have solidarity with police but not with the other Whites, right? That criticizing American police cowardly rules of engagement would lead to restriction on gun use among civilians? It seems that American Whites, particularly the ones on the Right, developed very strong Stockholm syndrome.

    Too many people are killed by police. I have seen many killings by American police that in most European countries would be qualified as a murder. Actually I haven't seen a single video of shooting yet that I couldn't find another solution than the shooting to kill that police opted out for. American police is taught incorrect rules of engagement. They do not know how to diffuse conflict situations without shooting. Use of gun is their first resort while it should be the last. Their training makes them callous cowards who behave like robots that only know one thing: shoot to kill. If it was otherwise we would not have the phenomenon of suicide by police. Only in America.

    BTW I do not hate police. I had only uneventful encounters with them but I am extra careful during every interaction with them. I go extra mile to oblige and not provoke them because I know they have a very thin skin and hair triggers. Basically I deal with them in obliging and very passive way as I would have behave when dealing with IDF in Gaza or Jewish or German Gestapo in Warsaw Ghetto. But I am not in Gaza or Warsaw Ghetto so I have higher expectations.
  80. @joef
    Majority of whites are not against the police, because they are against the criminals more. If you lived in a place like Chicago, St Louis, Bronx, Brooklyn, Newark, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New Orleans, Los Angeles, Camden Nj, Cleveland, etc etc, you would understand. But if you live in cupcake land you won't. Even for the whites in these areas who do not care for cops, there is a grudging respect for them because ghetto cops stood solo foot posts outgunned and out manned (dealing with thugs armed with machine pistols while only armed with six shot revolvers): they truly had to fight alone.

    There are many real police state problems such as:
    - - Ubiquitous use of police road blocks;
    - - Overuse of SWAT teams by small overeager police departments for non life threatening events;
    - - Traffic ticket quotas
    - - Stop & Seize civil forfeitures.
    - - The criminalization, by our legislature, of innocuous acts

    Now
    - - Are you saying that all police shootings involve completely innocent people?
    - - Are you saying that no one commits any violent felonies that require police intervention?
    - - Are you saying that you rather criminals are not stopped so they can continue to prey upon your fellow citizens (some of which are unable to defend themselves because of sex/age/disability)?
    - - Are you saying that all persons shot by the police are unarmed?
    - - If so have you ever been, or know someone who has been, on a one on one violent confrontation with an unarmed man who is trying to kill you (do you understand that kind of violent dynamic)?
    - - Are you saying that there are no circumstances where police are allowed to defend themselves ?
    - - Where did you get your figures (is the source bogus)?
    - - Are you saying all officers are accountable for all other officers, even if they do not know them, know of the incident involved, or work in the same geographic area (or police dept).
    - - Are you saying that we should incorporate the leftist concept of collective guilt against all police officers for the bad actions of some other police officers?
    - - Are you examining each event by a case by case basis or are you just making general statement that fits into an ideology?


    The problem with anarcho capitalist is that they are utopian ideologues, just like marxist. They use the same propaganda techniques, against the police, that leftist would use. It usually goes something like this: I have personal animosity against the police (in my local area), therefore they are all random killers of innocent people. Not exactly a logical argument that is full of objectivity.

    Now just because one obnoxious cop gave you a traffic ticket, and you believe it was equivalent to a trip to the gulag, does not make every other cop in the world responsible for it, nor does that mean they are routinely shooting innocent people like you suggested.

    Do you understand that, in many laws, the police use of force is equivalent to civilian use of force; & if you say police are not allowed to defend themselves in deadly force situations, you are making the case for leftist elites to deny all of us our right to protect ourselves with deadly force. What makes you believe that the leftist will deny the police use of force but allow you to use it when necessary? If you live in a violent urban area you are cognizant of that fact. Unfortunately you rather help contribute to leftist propaganda (guided by irrational hatred).

    “Unfortunately you rather help contribute to leftist propaganda (guided by irrational hatred).” – My thinking is guided by what is right or what is wrong and what is true or not true. Whether truth helps this or that propaganda is for me irrelevant and it should be for everybody so we would not have to deal with propaganda based on lies.

    “Where did you get your figures (is the source bogus)?” I found several sources. For instance http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2015/jun/01/the-counted-police-killings-us-database tells me that in 2015 581 Whites were killed and 306 Blacks were killed by police. These numbers when adjusted for population are 2.93 Whites/million 7.66 Blacks/million. This means that Black are 2.61 times more likely to be killed by police than Whites. This is not surprising because we know how much higher is criminal behavior among Blacks that leads to more frequent interactions with police. So I asked the question about number of killings per interaction with police. What I found was totally surprising to me that frequency of killings of Whites per interaction with police is 1.947 TIMES HIGHER than for for Blacks. This factor I obtained as follows: I do not know the number of interactions with police in each population but I do know prison population in the US which is 39% non-Hispanic white and 40% black. These two numbers I use as the surrogate (a proxy) for the number of interactions with police. Actually these two numbers (39 and 40) are directly proportional to the numbers of interactions with police leading to incarceration. Then I calculate (581/39)/(306/40)=1.947. This means that white person is 1.947 times more likely to be killed by police during interaction with police than a black person.

    Does it mean that Blacks when dealing with police are actually more submissive because they are killed at 1.947 lower rate?

    Does it mean that police when dealing with Blacks actually shows larger restrain that with Whites?

    Explain to me why Whites are killed almost twice as often as Blacks when interacting with police?

    Is it possible that police shows larger restrain when dealing with Blacks because Blacks actually speak for their own and get media coverage when a killing that they perceive as unjustified happens? So police is less likely to get away with murder when the victim is black?

    Does it mean that Whites do not care when other Whites are killed by police and consider all killings justified? Does it mean that Whites are happy or pretend to be happy with their police even though the police kills Whites at 1.947 higher rate than Blacks because… for instance because Whites are cucks who are afraid to face the truth about American police and would not want to aid what they perceive as the left wing propaganda that criticize American police? Whites have solidarity with police but not with the other Whites, right? That criticizing American police cowardly rules of engagement would lead to restriction on gun use among civilians? It seems that American Whites, particularly the ones on the Right, developed very strong Stockholm syndrome.

    Too many people are killed by police. I have seen many killings by American police that in most European countries would be qualified as a murder. Actually I haven’t seen a single video of shooting yet that I couldn’t find another solution than the shooting to kill that police opted out for. American police is taught incorrect rules of engagement. They do not know how to diffuse conflict situations without shooting. Use of gun is their first resort while it should be the last. Their training makes them callous cowards who behave like robots that only know one thing: shoot to kill. If it was otherwise we would not have the phenomenon of suicide by police. Only in America.

    BTW I do not hate police. I had only uneventful encounters with them but I am extra careful during every interaction with them. I go extra mile to oblige and not provoke them because I know they have a very thin skin and hair triggers. Basically I deal with them in obliging and very passive way as I would have behave when dealing with IDF in Gaza or Jewish or German Gestapo in Warsaw Ghetto. But I am not in Gaza or Warsaw Ghetto so I have higher expectations.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    The Guardian is a leftist British Newspaper, and like all leftist they do not adhere to the truth but promote propaganda to advance an agenda. To a leftist the truth is a malleable thing that is secondary to there own ideology. (Its unfortunate that anarcho capitalist want to cozy up to the left with the 'I hate the police too' nonsense.)

    Now if you found some incidents of wrong doing, I can go along with that if that is in fact demonstrated to be so. But you are not examining specific incidents, you are just generalizing.
    In addition there are millions of police citizen encounters that result in no shooting deaths or force used, but you just assume that the incidents of force are the only police encounters, therefore most encounters lead to police shooting.
    But how many state laws on the use of force, SCOTUS cases, and police policies & procedures have you actually read? You seem to pontificate on something that you never conducted reasonable research on. Are we all suppose to believe that police promote shootings because you said so (is opinion now considered fact). If you considered this seriously, then you would know that different police departments have different rules of engagement, and there is not one universal rule for all police as you have suggested. You are making an extraordinary claim that all the people that police officers shoot are completely innocent of criminal acts and did not engage in deadly physical force. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to support such claims.

    I do agree with you with that it is actually true that police officers may engage in shooting before using other force options. This was as a result of MSM & ACLU (american criminal liberties union) complaining that any act of force used by the police is excessive. The urban police hierarchy and politicians responded by actively discouraging officers from using lower force options in order to control the situation. They did this to avoid bad press, and lawsuits, and they wanted there cops to behave like social workers. As a result some incidents that were not controlled early on with lower force options would escalate to deadly force situations. If the cop was permitted to take control of the situation early on, with lower force options, then maybe it would not have escalated into situation requiring deadly force.

    Second is that courts perform a catch and release program with crime (police catch & courts release). Thus instead of containing the most violent criminals away from society, they are at large to continue to roam & prey upon the public. This leaves the onus on the police to control crime that is performed by recidivist violent offenders. As a result it requires more citizen police interaction than would otherwise be necessary if crime was low. Unfortunately the public look to the police as the only solution to crime, and are not really cognizant of the fact that if recidivist violent felons were in prison then they would not be committing as much crime. The public should be demanding proper incarceration rates for criminals who are convicted in courts, so it will require less police intervention in the streets.
    Third is the new millennial cops are a product of the society they came from. Millennials (I am going to generalize here but with plenty of personal empirical experience to make this claim) do not have any common sense. When the WW2 generation retired, the ability to handle chaotic situations with grace retired with them, and this skill diminished every generation after that.

    Maybe you reside in a rural/suburban community where the cops in your town are too officious or have a tendency to act in what would be considered an abusive manner towards ordinary people. Maybe they take their car stops for minor traffic infractions a little too seriously (Maybe they also resent big city cops and treat them the same way). Or then again maybe not. But if that is the case: what does some cop walking the beat in the ghetto have to do with that (you seem to be assigning collective guilt)?

    But we, in white flight land, understand that policing is a full contact event, and that being pro police is not as important as being anti criminal. We also know that confrontations in a urban setting are serious events which usually can end with someone going to the hospital. We do not romanticize police with sanctimonious praise, but we acknowledge that most of them are necessary to containing high crime, and being an urban ghetto cop is a very very difficult job (if you think you can do better try it then). The consequences are very real to us because we all personally know crime victims who have been seriously hurt or killed (this is not the land of make believe!). However we do not personally know of too many incidents where the cop shot someone for no reason.

    So realistically we do not fear cops (even if there are some officers who are aggressive egocentrics), because over here we have the real fear of getting killed (or loved ones victimized) by criminal predators. We also recognize that the left has irresponsibly created a situation of racial balkanization, that coupled with a declining economy, is a social powder keg, and the urban ghetto police are the first line of defense. And we also are very keen to a fact that would never be reported in the Guarding newspaper: that afro americans kill more U.S. residents than all other groups; and that includes terrorist, and that includes police officers. And why are not submissive whites complaining about that?

  81. @War for Blair Mountain
    If the 1965 Immigration Reform Act had not been passed, and if a National Origins Immigration Policy had been passed that excluded all nonwhite Legal Immigrants, Hillary Clinton would not have a massive Democratic Party Voting Bloc in 2016....And Native Born White Americans would still be a 90 percent racial majority in the US in 2016. Hillary Clinton would not have a snowballs-chance-in-hell of ever being elected POTUS on Nov 8 2016.



    After the Democratic Party Convention, Native Born White American Males will be murdered in Cold Blood all over the US. The White Cops were for practice.

    White women chemically neuter themselves with birth prevention pills -or have abortions. The more they are educated, the more neurotic they become. How can the U.S. remain 90 per cent white, if NO white western nation replenishes its demographic?

    Read More
    • Replies: @mr. meener
    what about adding 120 million non whites to the USA in the last 45 years
  82. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @mr. meener
    I wish I was around when whites were proud to be white and not around whites who celebrate their genocide. as far as abortion for negroes you must come out of mommies basement. in the cities even in rural south they have 4-8 kids while half the whites have no kids. it is only the white race that is declining in % of world population. you wasted a lot of ink trying to make me feel sorry for negroes but I do not care about them at all. black brown and yellow populations are exploding while whites are declining worlwide. so instead of being a pompous blowhard look up those stats it is the whites being eradicated

    Well, you’re certainly right about one thing… I can be a pompous blowhard. ;)

    All I’m trying to say is that I think that if we don’t all push back together as Americans against these Globalist “Elite” and their divide-and-conquer agenda, we don’t have a chance of stopping them. Not as White-Americans, African-Americans, Chinese-Americans, etc., but just as AMERICANS first and foremost.

    United we stand. Divided we can kiss our ass goodbye.

    I hope that you at least consider it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mr. meener
    there is no "we" involved in this . it is the survival of the white race whose numbers in world population are dwindling. all other races are exploding in number they want what we have it is us against them
  83. @Junior
    Well, you're certainly right about one thing... I can be a pompous blowhard. ;)

    All I'm trying to say is that I think that if we don't all push back together as Americans against these Globalist "Elite" and their divide-and-conquer agenda, we don't have a chance of stopping them. Not as White-Americans, African-Americans, Chinese-Americans, etc., but just as AMERICANS first and foremost.

    United we stand. Divided we can kiss our ass goodbye.

    I hope that you at least consider it.

    there is no “we” involved in this . it is the survival of the white race whose numbers in world population are dwindling. all other races are exploding in number they want what we have it is us against them

    Read More
    • Replies: @Junior

    there is no “we” involved in this . it is the survival of the white race whose numbers in world population are dwindling. all other races are exploding in number they want what we have it is us against them
     
    Well if it makes you feel any better, the Globalist "Elite" Zionists, whose agenda you are advancing to make slaves of us all, are all old white guys.

    So I guess there's that little bit of silver lining for you to be glad about while they tighten the noose around all our necks. "Why so glum everybody? At least it's white guys killin us. Put on a happy face!"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_CE7GqqrvY
  84. @Stonehands
    White women chemically neuter themselves with birth prevention pills -or have abortions. The more they are educated, the more neurotic they become. How can the U.S. remain 90 per cent white, if NO white western nation replenishes its demographic?

    what about adding 120 million non whites to the USA in the last 45 years

    Read More
  85. @utu
    "Unfortunately you rather help contribute to leftist propaganda (guided by irrational hatred)." - My thinking is guided by what is right or what is wrong and what is true or not true. Whether truth helps this or that propaganda is for me irrelevant and it should be for everybody so we would not have to deal with propaganda based on lies.

    "Where did you get your figures (is the source bogus)?" I found several sources. For instance http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2015/jun/01/the-counted-police-killings-us-database tells me that in 2015 581 Whites were killed and 306 Blacks were killed by police. These numbers when adjusted for population are 2.93 Whites/million 7.66 Blacks/million. This means that Black are 2.61 times more likely to be killed by police than Whites. This is not surprising because we know how much higher is criminal behavior among Blacks that leads to more frequent interactions with police. So I asked the question about number of killings per interaction with police. What I found was totally surprising to me that frequency of killings of Whites per interaction with police is 1.947 TIMES HIGHER than for for Blacks. This factor I obtained as follows: I do not know the number of interactions with police in each population but I do know prison population in the US which is 39% non-Hispanic white and 40% black. These two numbers I use as the surrogate (a proxy) for the number of interactions with police. Actually these two numbers (39 and 40) are directly proportional to the numbers of interactions with police leading to incarceration. Then I calculate (581/39)/(306/40)=1.947. This means that white person is 1.947 times more likely to be killed by police during interaction with police than a black person.

    Does it mean that Blacks when dealing with police are actually more submissive because they are killed at 1.947 lower rate?

    Does it mean that police when dealing with Blacks actually shows larger restrain that with Whites?

    Explain to me why Whites are killed almost twice as often as Blacks when interacting with police?

    Is it possible that police shows larger restrain when dealing with Blacks because Blacks actually speak for their own and get media coverage when a killing that they perceive as unjustified happens? So police is less likely to get away with murder when the victim is black?

    Does it mean that Whites do not care when other Whites are killed by police and consider all killings justified? Does it mean that Whites are happy or pretend to be happy with their police even though the police kills Whites at 1.947 higher rate than Blacks because... for instance because Whites are cucks who are afraid to face the truth about American police and would not want to aid what they perceive as the left wing propaganda that criticize American police? Whites have solidarity with police but not with the other Whites, right? That criticizing American police cowardly rules of engagement would lead to restriction on gun use among civilians? It seems that American Whites, particularly the ones on the Right, developed very strong Stockholm syndrome.

    Too many people are killed by police. I have seen many killings by American police that in most European countries would be qualified as a murder. Actually I haven't seen a single video of shooting yet that I couldn't find another solution than the shooting to kill that police opted out for. American police is taught incorrect rules of engagement. They do not know how to diffuse conflict situations without shooting. Use of gun is their first resort while it should be the last. Their training makes them callous cowards who behave like robots that only know one thing: shoot to kill. If it was otherwise we would not have the phenomenon of suicide by police. Only in America.

    BTW I do not hate police. I had only uneventful encounters with them but I am extra careful during every interaction with them. I go extra mile to oblige and not provoke them because I know they have a very thin skin and hair triggers. Basically I deal with them in obliging and very passive way as I would have behave when dealing with IDF in Gaza or Jewish or German Gestapo in Warsaw Ghetto. But I am not in Gaza or Warsaw Ghetto so I have higher expectations.

    The Guardian is a leftist British Newspaper, and like all leftist they do not adhere to the truth but promote propaganda to advance an agenda. To a leftist the truth is a malleable thing that is secondary to there own ideology. (Its unfortunate that anarcho capitalist want to cozy up to the left with the ‘I hate the police too’ nonsense.)

    Now if you found some incidents of wrong doing, I can go along with that if that is in fact demonstrated to be so. But you are not examining specific incidents, you are just generalizing.
    In addition there are millions of police citizen encounters that result in no shooting deaths or force used, but you just assume that the incidents of force are the only police encounters, therefore most encounters lead to police shooting.
    But how many state laws on the use of force, SCOTUS cases, and police policies & procedures have you actually read? You seem to pontificate on something that you never conducted reasonable research on. Are we all suppose to believe that police promote shootings because you said so (is opinion now considered fact). If you considered this seriously, then you would know that different police departments have different rules of engagement, and there is not one universal rule for all police as you have suggested. You are making an extraordinary claim that all the people that police officers shoot are completely innocent of criminal acts and did not engage in deadly physical force. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to support such claims.

    I do agree with you with that it is actually true that police officers may engage in shooting before using other force options. This was as a result of MSM & ACLU (american criminal liberties union) complaining that any act of force used by the police is excessive. The urban police hierarchy and politicians responded by actively discouraging officers from using lower force options in order to control the situation. They did this to avoid bad press, and lawsuits, and they wanted there cops to behave like social workers. As a result some incidents that were not controlled early on with lower force options would escalate to deadly force situations. If the cop was permitted to take control of the situation early on, with lower force options, then maybe it would not have escalated into situation requiring deadly force.

    Second is that courts perform a catch and release program with crime (police catch & courts release). Thus instead of containing the most violent criminals away from society, they are at large to continue to roam & prey upon the public. This leaves the onus on the police to control crime that is performed by recidivist violent offenders. As a result it requires more citizen police interaction than would otherwise be necessary if crime was low. Unfortunately the public look to the police as the only solution to crime, and are not really cognizant of the fact that if recidivist violent felons were in prison then they would not be committing as much crime. The public should be demanding proper incarceration rates for criminals who are convicted in courts, so it will require less police intervention in the streets.
    Third is the new millennial cops are a product of the society they came from. Millennials (I am going to generalize here but with plenty of personal empirical experience to make this claim) do not have any common sense. When the WW2 generation retired, the ability to handle chaotic situations with grace retired with them, and this skill diminished every generation after that.

    Maybe you reside in a rural/suburban community where the cops in your town are too officious or have a tendency to act in what would be considered an abusive manner towards ordinary people. Maybe they take their car stops for minor traffic infractions a little too seriously (Maybe they also resent big city cops and treat them the same way). Or then again maybe not. But if that is the case: what does some cop walking the beat in the ghetto have to do with that (you seem to be assigning collective guilt)?

    But we, in white flight land, understand that policing is a full contact event, and that being pro police is not as important as being anti criminal. We also know that confrontations in a urban setting are serious events which usually can end with someone going to the hospital. We do not romanticize police with sanctimonious praise, but we acknowledge that most of them are necessary to containing high crime, and being an urban ghetto cop is a very very difficult job (if you think you can do better try it then). The consequences are very real to us because we all personally know crime victims who have been seriously hurt or killed (this is not the land of make believe!). However we do not personally know of too many incidents where the cop shot someone for no reason.

    So realistically we do not fear cops (even if there are some officers who are aggressive egocentrics), because over here we have the real fear of getting killed (or loved ones victimized) by criminal predators. We also recognize that the left has irresponsibly created a situation of racial balkanization, that coupled with a declining economy, is a social powder keg, and the urban ghetto police are the first line of defense. And we also are very keen to a fact that would never be reported in the Guarding newspaper: that afro americans kill more U.S. residents than all other groups; and that includes terrorist, and that includes police officers. And why are not submissive whites complaining about that?

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    Oops. Typo in last paragraph: I meant to say 'Guardian newspaper'.
    , @mr. meener
    there are to many cops and to many laws. cops are traitors because they work for white hating homo loving communists. every week I read about a small white town where the feds dump somalians and other muslims. mayor gets paid off and turns on the people. the people try to protest and cops come down on them. try to protest the buses at the border taking the illegals all over the US. local cops will bust you up. who asked the cops to go in ghettos and become "heroes". a cab drivers job more dangerous then a cops job. 80% of suburban cops should be fired and the rest disarmed. there is no crime so they make it up and go after people for tiny infractions to keep their job. they do not stop crime they get there AFTER you are dead raped robbed and beaten. only scared cowards worship cops
  86. The system that you have subscribed to-The fag Keynes system -requires that you continually add tax fodder; to be fleeced and pay the juice on the deficit that “doesn’t matter.”

    Where else are these helots supposed to come from? All white nations are in decline.

    Enjoy the fruits of this mechanical utopia that godless science has bestowed you.

    Read More
  87. @joef
    The Guardian is a leftist British Newspaper, and like all leftist they do not adhere to the truth but promote propaganda to advance an agenda. To a leftist the truth is a malleable thing that is secondary to there own ideology. (Its unfortunate that anarcho capitalist want to cozy up to the left with the 'I hate the police too' nonsense.)

    Now if you found some incidents of wrong doing, I can go along with that if that is in fact demonstrated to be so. But you are not examining specific incidents, you are just generalizing.
    In addition there are millions of police citizen encounters that result in no shooting deaths or force used, but you just assume that the incidents of force are the only police encounters, therefore most encounters lead to police shooting.
    But how many state laws on the use of force, SCOTUS cases, and police policies & procedures have you actually read? You seem to pontificate on something that you never conducted reasonable research on. Are we all suppose to believe that police promote shootings because you said so (is opinion now considered fact). If you considered this seriously, then you would know that different police departments have different rules of engagement, and there is not one universal rule for all police as you have suggested. You are making an extraordinary claim that all the people that police officers shoot are completely innocent of criminal acts and did not engage in deadly physical force. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to support such claims.

    I do agree with you with that it is actually true that police officers may engage in shooting before using other force options. This was as a result of MSM & ACLU (american criminal liberties union) complaining that any act of force used by the police is excessive. The urban police hierarchy and politicians responded by actively discouraging officers from using lower force options in order to control the situation. They did this to avoid bad press, and lawsuits, and they wanted there cops to behave like social workers. As a result some incidents that were not controlled early on with lower force options would escalate to deadly force situations. If the cop was permitted to take control of the situation early on, with lower force options, then maybe it would not have escalated into situation requiring deadly force.

    Second is that courts perform a catch and release program with crime (police catch & courts release). Thus instead of containing the most violent criminals away from society, they are at large to continue to roam & prey upon the public. This leaves the onus on the police to control crime that is performed by recidivist violent offenders. As a result it requires more citizen police interaction than would otherwise be necessary if crime was low. Unfortunately the public look to the police as the only solution to crime, and are not really cognizant of the fact that if recidivist violent felons were in prison then they would not be committing as much crime. The public should be demanding proper incarceration rates for criminals who are convicted in courts, so it will require less police intervention in the streets.
    Third is the new millennial cops are a product of the society they came from. Millennials (I am going to generalize here but with plenty of personal empirical experience to make this claim) do not have any common sense. When the WW2 generation retired, the ability to handle chaotic situations with grace retired with them, and this skill diminished every generation after that.

    Maybe you reside in a rural/suburban community where the cops in your town are too officious or have a tendency to act in what would be considered an abusive manner towards ordinary people. Maybe they take their car stops for minor traffic infractions a little too seriously (Maybe they also resent big city cops and treat them the same way). Or then again maybe not. But if that is the case: what does some cop walking the beat in the ghetto have to do with that (you seem to be assigning collective guilt)?

    But we, in white flight land, understand that policing is a full contact event, and that being pro police is not as important as being anti criminal. We also know that confrontations in a urban setting are serious events which usually can end with someone going to the hospital. We do not romanticize police with sanctimonious praise, but we acknowledge that most of them are necessary to containing high crime, and being an urban ghetto cop is a very very difficult job (if you think you can do better try it then). The consequences are very real to us because we all personally know crime victims who have been seriously hurt or killed (this is not the land of make believe!). However we do not personally know of too many incidents where the cop shot someone for no reason.

    So realistically we do not fear cops (even if there are some officers who are aggressive egocentrics), because over here we have the real fear of getting killed (or loved ones victimized) by criminal predators. We also recognize that the left has irresponsibly created a situation of racial balkanization, that coupled with a declining economy, is a social powder keg, and the urban ghetto police are the first line of defense. And we also are very keen to a fact that would never be reported in the Guarding newspaper: that afro americans kill more U.S. residents than all other groups; and that includes terrorist, and that includes police officers. And why are not submissive whites complaining about that?

    Oops. Typo in last paragraph: I meant to say ‘Guardian newspaper’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    American police are callous cowards. They do not have to be that way. After all they are technically human so by proper training and acculturation their basic human functions could be restored. Their low IQ (http://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836 ) actually may help in this process as people with low IQ are more impressionable. Perhaps you too could be helped even though you seem to be that ignorant obstinate type. But you can try. You may start by reading these:

    Look how bad it is in comparison with other countries:

    Why American Cops Kill So Many Compared To European Cops
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/american-cops-lethal_us_565cde59e4b079b2818b8870

    Police in the US Kill Citizens at Over 70 Times the Rate of Other First-World Nations
    http://thefreethoughtproject.com/police-kill-citizens-70-times-rate-first-world-nations/

    How normal people and normal policemen react to the killing:

    Iceland grieves after police shoot and kill a man for the first time in its history
    http://www.pri.org/stories/2013-12-03/iceland-grieves-after-police-kill-man-first-time-its-history

    How pro-police propaganda works:

    A Brief History of the "War on Cops": The False Allegation That Enables Police Violence
    http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/36930-a-brief-history-of-the-war-on-cops-the-false-allegation-that-enables-police-violence
  88. @joef
    Oops. Typo in last paragraph: I meant to say 'Guardian newspaper'.

    American police are callous cowards. They do not have to be that way. After all they are technically human so by proper training and acculturation their basic human functions could be restored. Their low IQ (http://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836 ) actually may help in this process as people with low IQ are more impressionable. Perhaps you too could be helped even though you seem to be that ignorant obstinate type. But you can try. You may start by reading these:

    Look how bad it is in comparison with other countries:

    Why American Cops Kill So Many Compared To European Cops
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/american-cops-lethal_us_565cde59e4b079b2818b8870

    Police in the US Kill Citizens at Over 70 Times the Rate of Other First-World Nations
    http://thefreethoughtproject.com/police-kill-citizens-70-times-rate-first-world-nations/

    How normal people and normal policemen react to the killing:

    Iceland grieves after police shoot and kill a man for the first time in its history
    http://www.pri.org/stories/2013-12-03/iceland-grieves-after-police-kill-man-first-time-its-history

    How pro-police propaganda works:

    A Brief History of the “War on Cops”: The False Allegation That Enables Police Violence
    http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/36930-a-brief-history-of-the-war-on-cops-the-false-allegation-that-enables-police-violence

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    Your typical leftist type: cannot win your argument through factual content, so you rely on ad hominem attacks & other useless leftist propaganda sources (I actually have a 3,7 gpa from a academically challenging university in Economics from the boswash area).

    If you are so intelligent as you pretend, then answer me this:
    You state that according to the Guardian cops kill 1.9 more whites than blacks therefore that proves that whites are killed in greater proportion than blacks
    Have you ever read a census genius: There are five times more whites than blacks in this nations, so 1.9 times means that there are less whites killed in proportion to blacks by cops in this nation. Your analysis is incomplete so next time do your math to its proper conclusion.
    Don't blame me that your conspiracy theories do not meet the test of logic. I lived in a rough place and my empirical knowledge of reality helped me survive, so I had no time to come up with silly theories about the police.

  89. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @mr. meener
    there is no "we" involved in this . it is the survival of the white race whose numbers in world population are dwindling. all other races are exploding in number they want what we have it is us against them

    there is no “we” involved in this . it is the survival of the white race whose numbers in world population are dwindling. all other races are exploding in number they want what we have it is us against them

    Well if it makes you feel any better, the Globalist “Elite” Zionists, whose agenda you are advancing to make slaves of us all, are all old white guys.

    So I guess there’s that little bit of silver lining for you to be glad about while they tighten the noose around all our necks. “Why so glum everybody? At least it’s white guys killin us. Put on a happy face!”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_CE7GqqrvY

    Read More
    • Replies: @mr. meener
    I will not stand in a field holding hands with all races of people singing we are the world. you are falling into the final solution for the white race....mixing with non whites. you talk about the Zionist plan but they do not allow non whites in Israel that is their plan
  90. @joef
    The Guardian is a leftist British Newspaper, and like all leftist they do not adhere to the truth but promote propaganda to advance an agenda. To a leftist the truth is a malleable thing that is secondary to there own ideology. (Its unfortunate that anarcho capitalist want to cozy up to the left with the 'I hate the police too' nonsense.)

    Now if you found some incidents of wrong doing, I can go along with that if that is in fact demonstrated to be so. But you are not examining specific incidents, you are just generalizing.
    In addition there are millions of police citizen encounters that result in no shooting deaths or force used, but you just assume that the incidents of force are the only police encounters, therefore most encounters lead to police shooting.
    But how many state laws on the use of force, SCOTUS cases, and police policies & procedures have you actually read? You seem to pontificate on something that you never conducted reasonable research on. Are we all suppose to believe that police promote shootings because you said so (is opinion now considered fact). If you considered this seriously, then you would know that different police departments have different rules of engagement, and there is not one universal rule for all police as you have suggested. You are making an extraordinary claim that all the people that police officers shoot are completely innocent of criminal acts and did not engage in deadly physical force. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to support such claims.

    I do agree with you with that it is actually true that police officers may engage in shooting before using other force options. This was as a result of MSM & ACLU (american criminal liberties union) complaining that any act of force used by the police is excessive. The urban police hierarchy and politicians responded by actively discouraging officers from using lower force options in order to control the situation. They did this to avoid bad press, and lawsuits, and they wanted there cops to behave like social workers. As a result some incidents that were not controlled early on with lower force options would escalate to deadly force situations. If the cop was permitted to take control of the situation early on, with lower force options, then maybe it would not have escalated into situation requiring deadly force.

    Second is that courts perform a catch and release program with crime (police catch & courts release). Thus instead of containing the most violent criminals away from society, they are at large to continue to roam & prey upon the public. This leaves the onus on the police to control crime that is performed by recidivist violent offenders. As a result it requires more citizen police interaction than would otherwise be necessary if crime was low. Unfortunately the public look to the police as the only solution to crime, and are not really cognizant of the fact that if recidivist violent felons were in prison then they would not be committing as much crime. The public should be demanding proper incarceration rates for criminals who are convicted in courts, so it will require less police intervention in the streets.
    Third is the new millennial cops are a product of the society they came from. Millennials (I am going to generalize here but with plenty of personal empirical experience to make this claim) do not have any common sense. When the WW2 generation retired, the ability to handle chaotic situations with grace retired with them, and this skill diminished every generation after that.

    Maybe you reside in a rural/suburban community where the cops in your town are too officious or have a tendency to act in what would be considered an abusive manner towards ordinary people. Maybe they take their car stops for minor traffic infractions a little too seriously (Maybe they also resent big city cops and treat them the same way). Or then again maybe not. But if that is the case: what does some cop walking the beat in the ghetto have to do with that (you seem to be assigning collective guilt)?

    But we, in white flight land, understand that policing is a full contact event, and that being pro police is not as important as being anti criminal. We also know that confrontations in a urban setting are serious events which usually can end with someone going to the hospital. We do not romanticize police with sanctimonious praise, but we acknowledge that most of them are necessary to containing high crime, and being an urban ghetto cop is a very very difficult job (if you think you can do better try it then). The consequences are very real to us because we all personally know crime victims who have been seriously hurt or killed (this is not the land of make believe!). However we do not personally know of too many incidents where the cop shot someone for no reason.

    So realistically we do not fear cops (even if there are some officers who are aggressive egocentrics), because over here we have the real fear of getting killed (or loved ones victimized) by criminal predators. We also recognize that the left has irresponsibly created a situation of racial balkanization, that coupled with a declining economy, is a social powder keg, and the urban ghetto police are the first line of defense. And we also are very keen to a fact that would never be reported in the Guarding newspaper: that afro americans kill more U.S. residents than all other groups; and that includes terrorist, and that includes police officers. And why are not submissive whites complaining about that?

    there are to many cops and to many laws. cops are traitors because they work for white hating homo loving communists. every week I read about a small white town where the feds dump somalians and other muslims. mayor gets paid off and turns on the people. the people try to protest and cops come down on them. try to protest the buses at the border taking the illegals all over the US. local cops will bust you up. who asked the cops to go in ghettos and become “heroes”. a cab drivers job more dangerous then a cops job. 80% of suburban cops should be fired and the rest disarmed. there is no crime so they make it up and go after people for tiny infractions to keep their job. they do not stop crime they get there AFTER you are dead raped robbed and beaten. only scared cowards worship cops

    Read More
  91. @Junior

    there is no “we” involved in this . it is the survival of the white race whose numbers in world population are dwindling. all other races are exploding in number they want what we have it is us against them
     
    Well if it makes you feel any better, the Globalist "Elite" Zionists, whose agenda you are advancing to make slaves of us all, are all old white guys.

    So I guess there's that little bit of silver lining for you to be glad about while they tighten the noose around all our necks. "Why so glum everybody? At least it's white guys killin us. Put on a happy face!"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_CE7GqqrvY

    I will not stand in a field holding hands with all races of people singing we are the world. you are falling into the final solution for the white race….mixing with non whites. you talk about the Zionist plan but they do not allow non whites in Israel that is their plan

    Read More
  92. The 2016 Democratic Party Platform pledges to “Bring Americans Together and Remove Barriers to Opportunities” by beginning with “Ending Systemic Racism” (Page 14).

    Although not defining “Systematic Racism,” their plan specifies the course of action from the general to a very specific, and no doubt the most important, action in the very first paragraph:

    “Democrats will fight to end institutional and systemic racism in our society. We will challenge and dismantle the structures that define lasting racial, economic, political, and social inequity. Democrats will promote racial justice through fair, just, and equitable governing of all public-serving institutions and in the formation of public policy. Democrats support removing the Confederate battle flag from public properties, recognizing that it is a symbol of our nation’s racist past that has no place in our present or our future. We will push for a societal transformation to make it clear that black lives matter and that there is no place for racism in our country.”

    Read More
  93. @utu
    American police are callous cowards. They do not have to be that way. After all they are technically human so by proper training and acculturation their basic human functions could be restored. Their low IQ (http://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836 ) actually may help in this process as people with low IQ are more impressionable. Perhaps you too could be helped even though you seem to be that ignorant obstinate type. But you can try. You may start by reading these:

    Look how bad it is in comparison with other countries:

    Why American Cops Kill So Many Compared To European Cops
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/american-cops-lethal_us_565cde59e4b079b2818b8870

    Police in the US Kill Citizens at Over 70 Times the Rate of Other First-World Nations
    http://thefreethoughtproject.com/police-kill-citizens-70-times-rate-first-world-nations/

    How normal people and normal policemen react to the killing:

    Iceland grieves after police shoot and kill a man for the first time in its history
    http://www.pri.org/stories/2013-12-03/iceland-grieves-after-police-kill-man-first-time-its-history

    How pro-police propaganda works:

    A Brief History of the "War on Cops": The False Allegation That Enables Police Violence
    http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/36930-a-brief-history-of-the-war-on-cops-the-false-allegation-that-enables-police-violence

    Your typical leftist type: cannot win your argument through factual content, so you rely on ad hominem attacks & other useless leftist propaganda sources (I actually have a 3,7 gpa from a academically challenging university in Economics from the boswash area).

    If you are so intelligent as you pretend, then answer me this:
    You state that according to the Guardian cops kill 1.9 more whites than blacks therefore that proves that whites are killed in greater proportion than blacks
    Have you ever read a census genius: There are five times more whites than blacks in this nations, so 1.9 times means that there are less whites killed in proportion to blacks by cops in this nation. Your analysis is incomplete so next time do your math to its proper conclusion.
    Don’t blame me that your conspiracy theories do not meet the test of logic. I lived in a rough place and my empirical knowledge of reality helped me survive, so I had no time to come up with silly theories about the police.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    You have no clue. I do not believe you have studied economics. Even a student of home economics should understand my argument and the difference among numbers I presented and their interpretations. But I will state it again:

    Absolute number of killed by police in 2015:
    581 Whites 306 Blacks

    Number of killed per 1 million of White and Black population respectively:
    2.93 Whites/million of Whites 7.66 Blacks/million of Blacks
    It is 2.61 time larger for Blacks because Blacks have more interactions with police than Whites.

    Number of killed per number of interactions with police (that lead to incarceration):
    There is not enough data to estimate the individual numbers but the ratio of the two numbers can be derived. The number is larger for Whites than for Blacks by factor of 1.947.

    What everybody should take home from it:
    A black male has 2.61 larger chance to be killed by police than a white male but among those who have interactions with police a chance to be killed is 1.947 times larger for Whites.

    I think the reason for it is (1) that Blacks are more savvy when dealing with police than the clueless Whites who still believe that police is their friend and (2) that police is more reluctant to kill Blacks because of possible backlash in the media because black community feels solidarity with their own even the so-called criminals while white community feels more solidarity with police than with other Whites. So they rarely complain and that's why (plus being naive about police) their killing while in confrontation with police is more likely (by almost the factor of two) than for Blacks.

    You made another typo. It should be "3,7 gpa from a [sic] academically challeng[ed] university."
  94. @Junior

    but the permanent genocide of whites will be thru negroes breeding with whites... interbreeding is the final solution
     
    You clearly have no idea what is going on so let me clue you in, Fellow Nee. The plan is for the depopulation and genocide of ALL races so that it will be easier to control the masses of "useless eaters" under a One World Governance. They have you thinking that they are targeting one race and pointing the finger at it distracted while they are going after EVERYBODY. They do it through war, poisoning of our water and food supply, manufactured diseases and viruses, suppression of cures, famine... Aw hell, here's an article that lists most of them so that I don't have to spend an hour trying to remember them all:

    There are many means and methods of depopulation that are being employed today, the 3 primary of which include; unsustainable/exploitative international development, which leads to massive hunger, starvation and famine worldwide (at least 40 million deaths annually), the fomentation of war, hatred and military procurements throughout the nations leading to millions of deaths worldwide, and finially, the creation and spread of infectious diseases leading to global pandemic, plague and pestilence on an unprecedented scale.

    Other methods used include; the build-up and use of nuclear, chemical and biological agents, weapons and warfare, the poisoning and contamination of the planet's food and water supplies, the introduction and use of deadly pharmacuetical drugs in society, weather modification and the triggering of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis through electromagnetic psychotronic weapons both on Earth and in space, the promotion of homosexuality to limit population growth and spread the deadly AIDS virus, forced sterilization in countries such as China, forced vaccinations, abortion, euthanasia etc...
     
    http://rense.com/general64/pordc.htm

    If your suggested method of how they are implementing a final solution through "interbreeding" were true, then how do you account for Planned Parenthood being the leading cause of death for Blacks? You would think that they would be trying to save as many Black Babies as possible to carry out your "interbreeding final solution", wouldn't you?


    you are just to dense to understand what I said so have an adult read it to you. do you see politicians burning cities down? they have their role and so does the negro.
     
    No, I haven't seen politicians burning cities down, but I'll tell you who I have ALSO seen burning cities down besides Blacks...

    During the 1863 New York City draft riots, white people ran amok, killing black Americans and destroying the African-American community’s churches, orphanages, businesses and schools.

    In 1921, over a 24-hour time period, whites destroyed the prosperous black community in Tulsa, Oklahoma. White rioters used machine guns and dropped bombs (in what may be one of the first recorded uses of a plane for that purpose) on the black community. Conservative estimates suggest that at least several hundred black people were killed.

    In East Saint Louis, whites engaged in a pogrom against the black community. Like Chicago, this was part of the “Red Summers” in which whites attempted to reassert their control and dominance over the black community in the aftermath of World War I.

    Scholars such as James Loewen estimate that as many as 3,000 black communities were “ethnically cleansed” by white violence and other means of intimidation

    Historian Gregory Downs has suggested that as many as 50,000 black Americans were killed by white racial terrorism in the 30 years following the end of the American Civil War. This total may not even include at least 4,000 blacks who were victims of lynchings by whites across the South and other parts of the United States... By most empirical measures (land taken, people killed and number of occurrences—there were 26 white-on-black race riots during the year 1919 alone)
     

    http://www.salon.com/2015/05/01/white_americas_racial_amnesia_the_sobering_truth_about_our_countrys_race_riots_partner/

    1824 Providence- white mobs attack blacks for refusing to get off sidewalk; destroy 20 buildings in black district.

    1841 Cincinnati-white mobs riot against black dock workers using a cannon, destroying property & killing an unknown number.

    1842-Philadelphia white mobs attack a black parade and riot for 3 days, beating many, looting black homes & burning a church.

    1863 Detroit-after a sensationalist rape trial white mobs riot, beating and killing blacks and burning down some 35 buildings.

    1866 New Orleans- whites attack black political parade outside the Mechanics Institute in New Orleans; 38 killed and 46 wounded.

    1866 Memphis-white mobs riot against black Union soldiers; 46 blacks killed, 5 black women raped, 100 buildings looted & burned

    1868 Louisiana-"Opelousas Massacre" political riots result in over 1000 armed whites massacring perhaps over 100 black opponents

    1870 Laurens, SC- mob of 2500 armed whites riot against local freedman's militia, black officeholders & their white allies.

    1870 Eutaw, Alabama- in political unrest, white mobs spark riots at polling places to terrorize and intimidate black voters.

    1871 Meridian, MS- rioting white mobs kill 30 blacks over several days. local black homes burned along with a black school.

    1873 Colifax, LA- armed white mobs riot against black officeholders, burning courthouse with blacks inside, killing 60 to 150.

    1874 Vicksburg, MS- white citizens, angered by black voters and officeholders, erupt into a riot. 31 people were killed.

    1874 Coushatta, Louisiana- paramilitary White League sparks riot killing some 20 freedmen officeholders and their white allies.

    1874 Liberty Place Riot- in Louisiana 5000 White League members riot against local govt seen favorable to blacks. 40 killed.

    1876 Hamburg, SC- armed white mobs riot in local black district, killing members of black militia and looting the town.

    1898 Wilmington, NC- white mob of 2000 attacks black newspaper, rampaging & looting black district. 15 to 60 blacks killed.

    1898 Phoenix, SC- white mobs riot to stop blacks from voting, killing many prominent blacks, chasing others from their homes.

    1898 Lake City, SC- white mob riots against black postmaster, burning his home, killing him and his infant 1 yr old daughter.

    1906 Atlanta- 10,000 whites rampage thru black Atlanta for 3 days. 40 blacks killed, black property burned, forced to flee city

    1908 Springfield, IL- for two days white mobs riot in black district. 2 blacks killed, 40 homes & 20 businesses destroyed.

    1917 St. Louis- 3000 strong white mob burn & loot black homes & destroy local black business district. 100 to 200 blacks killed.

    1921 Tulsa- white mobs riot in black business district. 10,000 left homeless; 35 blocks destroyed; 800 injured; 25 to 300 killed

    going to end here. not a comprehensive list. Rosewood, Red Summer 1919, Anti-Filipino, Zoot Suit Riots & more left unmentioned.
     

    https://storify.com/pdjeliclark/a-history-of-white-riots-and-race-in-america

    I state these numerous examples of White Riots because although you acknowledge that the Zionist are using the Black Community as a tool, it's quite clear from all your nonsense about "interbreeding" being the problem that you need to be shown that under the right circumstances it could EASILY be the White race being used as a tool by the Zionists for riots instead. You seem to be implying that Rioting is a condition of Race, when it is in fact a condition of circumstances. And Zionists are creating the circumstances for it to happen.

    As I have stated their agenda is to turn each other against ourselves. They WANT race wars. They WANT a Police force that would be angry enough to enforce martial law and overlook the rights of citizens because they have been unjustly maligned through the "media" and Soros sponsored protests. They WANT us distracted into thinking that this is about one race being superior to another. You are furthering their agenda.

    But maybe you’re right and the problem is that I need to adjust the contrast settings on my TV again because the people and gangs rioting in the video I've posted below from a movie based on the Draft Riots are actually all black and I just didn’t realize it. TV must be on the fritz again. Goddamn you Toshiba! If only those Globalism loving Zionist hadn't sent all our factories overseas, maybe I could have bought an American TV that actually works.

    Now, if you don't mind, adults are trying to have a conversation so if you're just going to keep on trying to distract from the truth then please go back to bed.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKJ_OOKQVrU

    I state these numerous examples of White Riots because although you acknowledge that the Zionist are using the Black Community as a tool, it’s quite clear from all your nonsense about “interbreeding” being the problem that you need to be shown that under the right circumstances it could EASILY be the White race being used as a tool by the Zionists for riots instead. You seem to be implying that Rioting is a condition of Race, when it is in fact a condition of circumstances. And Zionists are creating the circumstances for it to happen.

    Most of the white riots you cited happened 100 or more years ago and were not orchestrated by “Zionists” which is a term used by people who are too cowardly to say Jews. The citations also lack context and imply that whites were mindless savages just like the contemporary negro once upon a time. The white riots took place long before the white man became brainwashed and denatured and were often in retaliation for violence and depredations committed by the blacks. The purpose was usually to deter blacks from further bad behavior against whites which almost always had the desired effect.

    Blacks, otoh, always burn down their own neighborhoods and business districts when they feel whitey has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism.

    True, there are Zionist machinations today, but if you’re trying to argue that without them blacks and whites would be getting along wonderfully that’s totally false evidenced by the violent conflict that regularly occurred between the two races long before the Zionist stranglehold on much of the white, Western world. Racial differences are real, not artificial, and they are easy to exploit by the string pullers.

    The only thing that can bring peace and stability is the racial partition of the USA.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Junior

    Most of the white riots you cited happened 100 or more years ago and were not orchestrated by “Zionists” which is a term used by people who are too cowardly to say Jews.
     
    The Zionists orchestrated the circumstances which brought about the Civil War. If you'll notice those riots all occur right around the time of President Jackson's shutting down of the second attempt of the Zionist Banksters Second Bank of the US and the years following it. This is no coincidence. The Banksters fueled the civil unrest much in the same as they are doing now in an attempt to cause Civil War, as they achieved with it back then. Back then it was to force us into not using debt free money, now it's for the stage of trying to cause Racial Riots to bring about there Global Governance. They have been trying to destroy America since it's inception.

    The term Zionist is used because not all Jewish People are involved in this conspiracy. Unlike people who like to paint with a broadbrush to try to make it easier to identify, I choose to correctly identify instead of going the more convenient incorrect route. The cowards are the people that choose to be incorrect because it's easier for them.


    The citations also lack context and imply that whites were mindless savages just like the contemporary negro once upon a time. The white riots took place long before the white man became brainwashed and denatured and were often in retaliation for violence and depredations committed by the blacks. The purpose was usually to deter blacks from further bad behavior against whites which almost always had the desired effect.
     
    This statement is pure rationalizations and excuse making. If you replace the word "White" with the word "Black" in it, you will see that rationalizations is exactly what it is. Here's what I mean: "The media reports of today also lack context and imply that blacks are mindless savages just like the past whites of once upon a time. The black riots are taking place since the black man has become brainwashed and denatured and are often in retaliation for violence and depredations committed by the whites. The purpose is usually to deter whites from further bad behavior against blacks which almost always has not had the desired effect."

    Blacks, otoh, always burn down their own neighborhoods and business districts when they feel whitey has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism.
     
    I agree completely that burning down your own neighborhood is sheer stupidity, but it must be noted that this is the result of politicians that have their Police force allow for the rioting and instead of breaking it up, they keep it boxed in those neighborhoods with police lines protecting the neighborhoods they deem worthy. I'd also like to point out that your statement can again be said for whites to point out to you that it is a condition of the whole human race not one particular race: "Whites, otoh, always burn down their own sports stadiums, concert venues and business districts when they feel the opposing team that beat their team, a referee, or Guns & Roses not showing up for the concert has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism."

    As the Dead Kennedys explained the sheer stupidity of it in their INCREDIBLE song Riot:

    But you get to the place
    Where the real slave-drivers live
    It's walled off by the riot squad aiming guns right at your head
    So you turn right around
    And play right into their hands
    And set your own neighborhood
    Burning to the ground instead

    Riot, the unbeatable high
    Riot, shoots your nerves to the sky
    Riot, playing right into their hands
    Tomorrow you're homeless, tonight it's a blast?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF7e2rgzsrU


    True, there are Zionist machinations today, but if you’re trying to argue that without them blacks and whites would be getting along wonderfully that’s totally false evidenced by the violent conflict that regularly occurred between the two races long before the Zionist stranglehold on much of the white, Western world. Racial differences are real, not artificial, and they are easy to exploit by the string pullers.
     
    I agree completely with the statement that racial differences are easily exploited by the string pullers, but your statement beforehand about races not being able to get along is totally false as is evidenced by countries such as the most densely populated country in the world, the Netherlands where you see different races coexisting in relative peace with basically the same percentages as in the US. "Ethnic groups: Over 81,7% of the population are Dutch (Germanic and Gallo-Celtic stock), other 18,3% (of which 9% are non-western origin mainly Turks, Moroccans, Antilleans, Surinamese and Indonesians) (1999 est.)"
    http://www.amsterdam.info/netherlands/population

    The only thing that can bring peace and stability is the racial partition of the USA.
     
    I'd like to counter that with the fact that it's a moot point because there won't be ANY USA unless we all come together as Americans to free ourselves from our "Elite" slavemasters. I say, let's get our priorities straight and then we can figure out how to fix our racial issues that the string pullers have exploited.
  95. @joef
    Your typical leftist type: cannot win your argument through factual content, so you rely on ad hominem attacks & other useless leftist propaganda sources (I actually have a 3,7 gpa from a academically challenging university in Economics from the boswash area).

    If you are so intelligent as you pretend, then answer me this:
    You state that according to the Guardian cops kill 1.9 more whites than blacks therefore that proves that whites are killed in greater proportion than blacks
    Have you ever read a census genius: There are five times more whites than blacks in this nations, so 1.9 times means that there are less whites killed in proportion to blacks by cops in this nation. Your analysis is incomplete so next time do your math to its proper conclusion.
    Don't blame me that your conspiracy theories do not meet the test of logic. I lived in a rough place and my empirical knowledge of reality helped me survive, so I had no time to come up with silly theories about the police.

    You have no clue. I do not believe you have studied economics. Even a student of home economics should understand my argument and the difference among numbers I presented and their interpretations. But I will state it again:

    Absolute number of killed by police in 2015:
    581 Whites 306 Blacks

    Number of killed per 1 million of White and Black population respectively:
    2.93 Whites/million of Whites 7.66 Blacks/million of Blacks
    It is 2.61 time larger for Blacks because Blacks have more interactions with police than Whites.

    Number of killed per number of interactions with police (that lead to incarceration):
    There is not enough data to estimate the individual numbers but the ratio of the two numbers can be derived. The number is larger for Whites than for Blacks by factor of 1.947.

    What everybody should take home from it:
    A black male has 2.61 larger chance to be killed by police than a white male but among those who have interactions with police a chance to be killed is 1.947 times larger for Whites.

    I think the reason for it is (1) that Blacks are more savvy when dealing with police than the clueless Whites who still believe that police is their friend and (2) that police is more reluctant to kill Blacks because of possible backlash in the media because black community feels solidarity with their own even the so-called criminals while white community feels more solidarity with police than with other Whites. So they rarely complain and that’s why (plus being naive about police) their killing while in confrontation with police is more likely (by almost the factor of two) than for Blacks.

    You made another typo. It should be “3,7 gpa from a [sic] academically challeng[ed] university.”

    Read More
  96. I do not think you ever lived in reality, just obfuscations to promote your pet conspiracy theory. Thats the problem with todays generations, no discretion (including young cops), and no distinctions. With a lack of real world experience on the subject (if you did not personally experience it, I guess it does not exist); you just repeat other peoples theories that you agree with.
    Thus I will just leave you to what you want to believe, because their is not point in continuing. You cannot stand disagreement so you will just continue ad hominem attacks when challenged.
    Good luck on your deriving things where you have no data. Go live in your bubble, but do not live near a major urban ghetto, because your opinions may get challenged by harsh reality, and I wouldn’t want you to get disillusioned.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    You still don't get it. You need to unblock your mind and allow for a rudimentary thinking process to resume. It is possible. Do not give up. Expand the cognitive bubble you live in.
  97. @joef
    I do not think you ever lived in reality, just obfuscations to promote your pet conspiracy theory. Thats the problem with todays generations, no discretion (including young cops), and no distinctions. With a lack of real world experience on the subject (if you did not personally experience it, I guess it does not exist); you just repeat other peoples theories that you agree with.
    Thus I will just leave you to what you want to believe, because their is not point in continuing. You cannot stand disagreement so you will just continue ad hominem attacks when challenged.
    Good luck on your deriving things where you have no data. Go live in your bubble, but do not live near a major urban ghetto, because your opinions may get challenged by harsh reality, and I wouldn't want you to get disillusioned.

    You still don’t get it. You need to unblock your mind and allow for a rudimentary thinking process to resume. It is possible. Do not give up. Expand the cognitive bubble you live in.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    I hope you wake up too.
    I believe you are just scapegoating, but you are not alone. Most of society is looking for some group to blame, you just chose the police. I guess I cannot blame you completely, because you are just looking for answers (in the wrong places). I am guilty of it myself when I make statements that sounds as if I am blaming all blacks for the actions of a fraction of afro americans. We lack discernment and discretion. We replace empirical facts with arrogance. We are all guilty of it, and that will eventually lead to a social condition where its all against all.
    Good luck to you, I hope you find some peace (but with your current mindset, I do not think you really will).
  98. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @KenH

    I state these numerous examples of White Riots because although you acknowledge that the Zionist are using the Black Community as a tool, it’s quite clear from all your nonsense about “interbreeding” being the problem that you need to be shown that under the right circumstances it could EASILY be the White race being used as a tool by the Zionists for riots instead. You seem to be implying that Rioting is a condition of Race, when it is in fact a condition of circumstances. And Zionists are creating the circumstances for it to happen.
     
    Most of the white riots you cited happened 100 or more years ago and were not orchestrated by "Zionists" which is a term used by people who are too cowardly to say Jews. The citations also lack context and imply that whites were mindless savages just like the contemporary negro once upon a time. The white riots took place long before the white man became brainwashed and denatured and were often in retaliation for violence and depredations committed by the blacks. The purpose was usually to deter blacks from further bad behavior against whites which almost always had the desired effect.

    Blacks, otoh, always burn down their own neighborhoods and business districts when they feel whitey has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism.

    True, there are Zionist machinations today, but if you're trying to argue that without them blacks and whites would be getting along wonderfully that's totally false evidenced by the violent conflict that regularly occurred between the two races long before the Zionist stranglehold on much of the white, Western world. Racial differences are real, not artificial, and they are easy to exploit by the string pullers.

    The only thing that can bring peace and stability is the racial partition of the USA.

    Most of the white riots you cited happened 100 or more years ago and were not orchestrated by “Zionists” which is a term used by people who are too cowardly to say Jews.

    The Zionists orchestrated the circumstances which brought about the Civil War. If you’ll notice those riots all occur right around the time of President Jackson’s shutting down of the second attempt of the Zionist Banksters Second Bank of the US and the years following it. This is no coincidence. The Banksters fueled the civil unrest much in the same as they are doing now in an attempt to cause Civil War, as they achieved with it back then. Back then it was to force us into not using debt free money, now it’s for the stage of trying to cause Racial Riots to bring about there Global Governance. They have been trying to destroy America since it’s inception.

    The term Zionist is used because not all Jewish People are involved in this conspiracy. Unlike people who like to paint with a broadbrush to try to make it easier to identify, I choose to correctly identify instead of going the more convenient incorrect route. The cowards are the people that choose to be incorrect because it’s easier for them.

    The citations also lack context and imply that whites were mindless savages just like the contemporary negro once upon a time. The white riots took place long before the white man became brainwashed and denatured and were often in retaliation for violence and depredations committed by the blacks. The purpose was usually to deter blacks from further bad behavior against whites which almost always had the desired effect.

    This statement is pure rationalizations and excuse making. If you replace the word “White” with the word “Black” in it, you will see that rationalizations is exactly what it is. Here’s what I mean: “The media reports of today also lack context and imply that blacks are mindless savages just like the past whites of once upon a time. The black riots are taking place since the black man has become brainwashed and denatured and are often in retaliation for violence and depredations committed by the whites. The purpose is usually to deter whites from further bad behavior against blacks which almost always has not had the desired effect.”

    Blacks, otoh, always burn down their own neighborhoods and business districts when they feel whitey has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism.

    I agree completely that burning down your own neighborhood is sheer stupidity, but it must be noted that this is the result of politicians that have their Police force allow for the rioting and instead of breaking it up, they keep it boxed in those neighborhoods with police lines protecting the neighborhoods they deem worthy. I’d also like to point out that your statement can again be said for whites to point out to you that it is a condition of the whole human race not one particular race: “Whites, otoh, always burn down their own sports stadiums, concert venues and business districts when they feel the opposing team that beat their team, a referee, or Guns & Roses not showing up for the concert has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism.”

    As the Dead Kennedys explained the sheer stupidity of it in their INCREDIBLE song Riot:

    But you get to the place
    Where the real slave-drivers live
    It’s walled off by the riot squad aiming guns right at your head
    So you turn right around
    And play right into their hands
    And set your own neighborhood
    Burning to the ground instead

    Riot, the unbeatable high
    Riot, shoots your nerves to the sky
    Riot, playing right into their hands
    Tomorrow you’re homeless, tonight it’s a blast?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF7e2rgzsrU

    True, there are Zionist machinations today, but if you’re trying to argue that without them blacks and whites would be getting along wonderfully that’s totally false evidenced by the violent conflict that regularly occurred between the two races long before the Zionist stranglehold on much of the white, Western world. Racial differences are real, not artificial, and they are easy to exploit by the string pullers.

    I agree completely with the statement that racial differences are easily exploited by the string pullers, but your statement beforehand about races not being able to get along is totally false as is evidenced by countries such as the most densely populated country in the world, the Netherlands where you see different races coexisting in relative peace with basically the same percentages as in the US. “Ethnic groups: Over 81,7% of the population are Dutch (Germanic and Gallo-Celtic stock), other 18,3% (of which 9% are non-western origin mainly Turks, Moroccans, Antilleans, Surinamese and Indonesians) (1999 est.)”
    http://www.amsterdam.info/netherlands/population

    The only thing that can bring peace and stability is the racial partition of the USA.

    I’d like to counter that with the fact that it’s a moot point because there won’t be ANY USA unless we all come together as Americans to free ourselves from our “Elite” slavemasters. I say, let’s get our priorities straight and then we can figure out how to fix our racial issues that the string pullers have exploited.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Junior

    as is evidenced by countries such as the most densely populated country in the world, the Netherlands where you see different races coexisting in relative peace with basically the same percentages as in the US.
     
    Forgot to expound on this extremely important example of the races coexisting in relative peace in the Netherlands and why they are:

    While other Western countries have been the scene of ethnic riots, the Netherlands remained quiet. According to one new study, the Dutch have their police to thank for it.

    How has the Netherlands managed to escaped large-scale ethnic riots, wondered researcher Otto Adang and two of his colleagues. On Monday, Adang, who teaches public order and threat control at the Apeldoorn police academy, presented his findings to the acting minister of home affairs, Ernst Hirsch Ballin. The report titled Are we different? tries to explain why the rise in immigration, and tensions accompanying it, hasn’t led to an explosion.

    Knowing what lies behind the absence of ethnic riots in the Netherlands is important, said Adang, because some have warned they could happen any moment. "With reason," Adang said. "In a heavily polarised society, riots can easily break out."

    Other Western countries have seen their share of race riots. As recently as 2005, heavy rioting gripped the outer neighbourhoods of France’s major cities, but the first ethnic riots there took place in the 1970s. The UK, Belgium and the US have also been the scene of some violent ethnic rioting.

    Many incidents

    The Netherlands has some ethnic tensions of its own. In recent years, incidents could have easily escalated into more serious turmoil. A neighbourhood in the city of Gouda remained a hotbed of unrest long after a bus driver had been threatened in 2008, and his colleagues refused to traverse the neighbourhood.

    In Amsterdam's Slotervaart neighbourhood, emotions ran high after a Moroccan-Dutch man was shot and killed by a police officer in the same year he had stabbed both her and a colleague. Earlier this year, confrontations between youths of Moroccan and Moluccan descent rocked the rural town of Culemborg. The list of ethnic incidents goes on.

    "The reason for these ethnic riots lies largely in segregation and social-economic deprivation," Adang said. “Large scale immigration is a relatively recent phenomenon. We have ethnic neighbourhoods of course, but we don’t have ghettos like the US or the UK do. The Dutch social security system prevents extreme poverty." But that is not the only reason ethnic tensions may be milder in the Netherlands. Based on his research, Adang has concluded that the police also plays an important part.

    In general, two models for police action exist. In the repressive model, the police simply upholds the law by cracking down on violations. This type of police action is mainly directed at symptoms, not at underlying causes. The police force is an outsider in neighbourhoods, and it approaches residents as a group.

    In the second model of police action, police officers are familiar with a certain neighbourhood. Officers invest time and effort in their contacts with local residents and social organisations. They get in touch with mosques and social workers; they know the local priest and occasionally participate in neighbourhood meetings. In this model, police officers also uphold the law, but only through targeted action. Police officers are familiar with the peculiarities of ethnic groups, allowing them to respond adequately to problems.

    No dumb luck

    In the Netherlands, the police adopted the latter, network-oriented, approach as early as the 1980s. This helps to quell incipient riots, said Adang. "When trouble arises, they can fall back on their relationships. As a police officer, you have your sensors out in society. You can prevent escalation by using your network. It was more than dumb luck that we have avoided ethnic riots."

    According to Adang, investing in local work is the way to go. He wants this to get more attention both within the police and from politicians. Some experts he interviewed for his study said they could not rule out ethnic riots from taking place in the Netherlands in the future. At the same time, the tendency in recent years has been to emphasise repression and upholding of the law, Adang said. "Upholding the law is good. The police has cracked down on crime and anti-social behaviour. Nobody is against that,” he said.

    “But addressing people based on their group-membership instead of their behaviour doesn't work well. A police officer busy writing tickets and meeting targets can only spend part of this time maintaining relationships. The sense of balance is lost." The problem here, Adang said, is that there is no direct pay-off. "Connections only become valuable when trouble arises."

     

    http://vorige.nrc.nl/international/article2532816.ece/Absence_of_ethnic_violence_in_the_Netherlands_explained
    , @KenH

    The Zionists orchestrated the circumstances which brought about the Civil War. If you’ll notice those riots all occur right around the time of President Jackson’s shutting down of the second attempt of the Zionist Banksters Second Bank of the US and the years following it. This is no coincidence.
     
    Zionism didn't come into being until 1896. The civil war took place between 1861 and 1865 or 35 years before Zionism. Andrew Jackson served as president from 1829 to 1837. The first riot you cited occurred in 1824 while the second riot occurred in 1841, so a causal link cannot be established and this is speculation.

    Are you arguing that there were pre-Zionism "Zionists" who orchestrated the riots to dissuade Jackson from shutting down the second central bank?


    The term Zionist is used because not all Jewish People are involved in this conspiracy. Unlike people who like to paint with a broadbrush to try to make it easier to identify,.....
     
    Not all Jews are Zionists but all Zionists are Jews. And anti-Zionist Jews appear to be in the minority and their opposition to Zionists and Zionism largely ineffectual.

    I agree completely that burning down your own neighborhood is sheer stupidity, but it must be noted that this is the result of politicians that have their Police force allow for the rioting and instead of breaking it up, they keep it boxed in those neighborhoods with police lines protecting the neighborhoods they deem worthy.
     
    The police are always heavily outnumbered by the rioters so there's nothing stopping some or many black rioters from slipping through any net and rioting in non-black neighborhoods. In order to stop the rioting the police would need to shoot dozens of black rioters which would be decried as racism, police brutality, white supremacism ad infinitum and the police would have their lives destroyed.

    “Whites, otoh, always burn down their own sports stadiums, concert venues and business districts when they feel the opposing team that beat their team, a referee, or Guns & Roses not showing up for the concert has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism.”
     
    Cite when and where whites have burned down their own sports stadiums, concert venues and business districts with the same frequency to what blacks have been doing since 1965 and in L.A. in 1992, Cincinnati in 2001, Ferguson in 2014 and Baltimore in 2015.

    I agree completely with the statement that racial differences are easily exploited by the string pullers, but your statement beforehand about races not being able to get along is totally false as is evidenced by countries such as the most densely populated country in the world, the Netherlands where you see different races coexisting in relative peace with basically the same percentages as in the US.
     
    The Netherlands is approximately 80% white while the USA is 62% white. Nevertheless, the Netherlands has had some problems associated with multiculturalism which will only worsen as the native Dutch decline relative to the Muslims and non-whites.

    I’d like to counter that with the fact that it’s a moot point because there won’t be ANY USA unless we all come together as Americans to free ourselves from our “Elite” slavemasters.
     
    That's heartwarming but most non-whites identity with their race first and their nation second, if at all. For it was none other than black Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Obama's spiritual mentor who thundered "God Damn America!!!" from his bully pulpit.
  99. @utu
    You still don't get it. You need to unblock your mind and allow for a rudimentary thinking process to resume. It is possible. Do not give up. Expand the cognitive bubble you live in.

    I hope you wake up too.
    I believe you are just scapegoating, but you are not alone. Most of society is looking for some group to blame, you just chose the police. I guess I cannot blame you completely, because you are just looking for answers (in the wrong places). I am guilty of it myself when I make statements that sounds as if I am blaming all blacks for the actions of a fraction of afro americans. We lack discernment and discretion. We replace empirical facts with arrogance. We are all guilty of it, and that will eventually lead to a social condition where its all against all.
    Good luck to you, I hope you find some peace (but with your current mindset, I do not think you really will).

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    "We replace empirical facts with arrogance. " - I gave you some empirical facts and you fail to comprehend them and their significance.

    But I like the rest of your comment as it implies a degree of self awareness. Good luck to you too.
  100. @joef
    I hope you wake up too.
    I believe you are just scapegoating, but you are not alone. Most of society is looking for some group to blame, you just chose the police. I guess I cannot blame you completely, because you are just looking for answers (in the wrong places). I am guilty of it myself when I make statements that sounds as if I am blaming all blacks for the actions of a fraction of afro americans. We lack discernment and discretion. We replace empirical facts with arrogance. We are all guilty of it, and that will eventually lead to a social condition where its all against all.
    Good luck to you, I hope you find some peace (but with your current mindset, I do not think you really will).

    “We replace empirical facts with arrogance. ” – I gave you some empirical facts and you fail to comprehend them and their significance.

    But I like the rest of your comment as it implies a degree of self awareness. Good luck to you too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    I can only leave you with this advice: Discerning distinctions is a very valuable skill.
    Live long and prosper.
  101. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Junior

    Most of the white riots you cited happened 100 or more years ago and were not orchestrated by “Zionists” which is a term used by people who are too cowardly to say Jews.
     
    The Zionists orchestrated the circumstances which brought about the Civil War. If you'll notice those riots all occur right around the time of President Jackson's shutting down of the second attempt of the Zionist Banksters Second Bank of the US and the years following it. This is no coincidence. The Banksters fueled the civil unrest much in the same as they are doing now in an attempt to cause Civil War, as they achieved with it back then. Back then it was to force us into not using debt free money, now it's for the stage of trying to cause Racial Riots to bring about there Global Governance. They have been trying to destroy America since it's inception.

    The term Zionist is used because not all Jewish People are involved in this conspiracy. Unlike people who like to paint with a broadbrush to try to make it easier to identify, I choose to correctly identify instead of going the more convenient incorrect route. The cowards are the people that choose to be incorrect because it's easier for them.


    The citations also lack context and imply that whites were mindless savages just like the contemporary negro once upon a time. The white riots took place long before the white man became brainwashed and denatured and were often in retaliation for violence and depredations committed by the blacks. The purpose was usually to deter blacks from further bad behavior against whites which almost always had the desired effect.
     
    This statement is pure rationalizations and excuse making. If you replace the word "White" with the word "Black" in it, you will see that rationalizations is exactly what it is. Here's what I mean: "The media reports of today also lack context and imply that blacks are mindless savages just like the past whites of once upon a time. The black riots are taking place since the black man has become brainwashed and denatured and are often in retaliation for violence and depredations committed by the whites. The purpose is usually to deter whites from further bad behavior against blacks which almost always has not had the desired effect."

    Blacks, otoh, always burn down their own neighborhoods and business districts when they feel whitey has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism.
     
    I agree completely that burning down your own neighborhood is sheer stupidity, but it must be noted that this is the result of politicians that have their Police force allow for the rioting and instead of breaking it up, they keep it boxed in those neighborhoods with police lines protecting the neighborhoods they deem worthy. I'd also like to point out that your statement can again be said for whites to point out to you that it is a condition of the whole human race not one particular race: "Whites, otoh, always burn down their own sports stadiums, concert venues and business districts when they feel the opposing team that beat their team, a referee, or Guns & Roses not showing up for the concert has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism."

    As the Dead Kennedys explained the sheer stupidity of it in their INCREDIBLE song Riot:

    But you get to the place
    Where the real slave-drivers live
    It's walled off by the riot squad aiming guns right at your head
    So you turn right around
    And play right into their hands
    And set your own neighborhood
    Burning to the ground instead

    Riot, the unbeatable high
    Riot, shoots your nerves to the sky
    Riot, playing right into their hands
    Tomorrow you're homeless, tonight it's a blast?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF7e2rgzsrU


    True, there are Zionist machinations today, but if you’re trying to argue that without them blacks and whites would be getting along wonderfully that’s totally false evidenced by the violent conflict that regularly occurred between the two races long before the Zionist stranglehold on much of the white, Western world. Racial differences are real, not artificial, and they are easy to exploit by the string pullers.
     
    I agree completely with the statement that racial differences are easily exploited by the string pullers, but your statement beforehand about races not being able to get along is totally false as is evidenced by countries such as the most densely populated country in the world, the Netherlands where you see different races coexisting in relative peace with basically the same percentages as in the US. "Ethnic groups: Over 81,7% of the population are Dutch (Germanic and Gallo-Celtic stock), other 18,3% (of which 9% are non-western origin mainly Turks, Moroccans, Antilleans, Surinamese and Indonesians) (1999 est.)"
    http://www.amsterdam.info/netherlands/population

    The only thing that can bring peace and stability is the racial partition of the USA.
     
    I'd like to counter that with the fact that it's a moot point because there won't be ANY USA unless we all come together as Americans to free ourselves from our "Elite" slavemasters. I say, let's get our priorities straight and then we can figure out how to fix our racial issues that the string pullers have exploited.

    as is evidenced by countries such as the most densely populated country in the world, the Netherlands where you see different races coexisting in relative peace with basically the same percentages as in the US.

    Forgot to expound on this extremely important example of the races coexisting in relative peace in the Netherlands and why they are:

    [MORE]

    While other Western countries have been the scene of ethnic riots, the Netherlands remained quiet. According to one new study, the Dutch have their police to thank for it.

    How has the Netherlands managed to escaped large-scale ethnic riots, wondered researcher Otto Adang and two of his colleagues. On Monday, Adang, who teaches public order and threat control at the Apeldoorn police academy, presented his findings to the acting minister of home affairs, Ernst Hirsch Ballin. The report titled Are we different? tries to explain why the rise in immigration, and tensions accompanying it, hasn’t led to an explosion.

    Knowing what lies behind the absence of ethnic riots in the Netherlands is important, said Adang, because some have warned they could happen any moment. “With reason,” Adang said. “In a heavily polarised society, riots can easily break out.”

    Other Western countries have seen their share of race riots. As recently as 2005, heavy rioting gripped the outer neighbourhoods of France’s major cities, but the first ethnic riots there took place in the 1970s. The UK, Belgium and the US have also been the scene of some violent ethnic rioting.

    Many incidents

    The Netherlands has some ethnic tensions of its own. In recent years, incidents could have easily escalated into more serious turmoil. A neighbourhood in the city of Gouda remained a hotbed of unrest long after a bus driver had been threatened in 2008, and his colleagues refused to traverse the neighbourhood.

    In Amsterdam’s Slotervaart neighbourhood, emotions ran high after a Moroccan-Dutch man was shot and killed by a police officer in the same year he had stabbed both her and a colleague. Earlier this year, confrontations between youths of Moroccan and Moluccan descent rocked the rural town of Culemborg. The list of ethnic incidents goes on.

    “The reason for these ethnic riots lies largely in segregation and social-economic deprivation,” Adang said. “Large scale immigration is a relatively recent phenomenon. We have ethnic neighbourhoods of course, but we don’t have ghettos like the US or the UK do. The Dutch social security system prevents extreme poverty.” But that is not the only reason ethnic tensions may be milder in the Netherlands. Based on his research, Adang has concluded that the police also plays an important part.

    In general, two models for police action exist. In the repressive model, the police simply upholds the law by cracking down on violations. This type of police action is mainly directed at symptoms, not at underlying causes. The police force is an outsider in neighbourhoods, and it approaches residents as a group.

    In the second model of police action, police officers are familiar with a certain neighbourhood. Officers invest time and effort in their contacts with local residents and social organisations. They get in touch with mosques and social workers; they know the local priest and occasionally participate in neighbourhood meetings. In this model, police officers also uphold the law, but only through targeted action. Police officers are familiar with the peculiarities of ethnic groups, allowing them to respond adequately to problems.

    No dumb luck

    In the Netherlands, the police adopted the latter, network-oriented, approach as early as the 1980s. This helps to quell incipient riots, said Adang. “When trouble arises, they can fall back on their relationships. As a police officer, you have your sensors out in society. You can prevent escalation by using your network. It was more than dumb luck that we have avoided ethnic riots.”

    According to Adang, investing in local work is the way to go. He wants this to get more attention both within the police and from politicians. Some experts he interviewed for his study said they could not rule out ethnic riots from taking place in the Netherlands in the future. At the same time, the tendency in recent years has been to emphasise repression and upholding of the law, Adang said. “Upholding the law is good. The police has cracked down on crime and anti-social behaviour. Nobody is against that,” he said.

    “But addressing people based on their group-membership instead of their behaviour doesn’t work well. A police officer busy writing tickets and meeting targets can only spend part of this time maintaining relationships. The sense of balance is lost.” The problem here, Adang said, is that there is no direct pay-off. “Connections only become valuable when trouble arises.”

    http://vorige.nrc.nl/international/article2532816.ece/Absence_of_ethnic_violence_in_the_Netherlands_explained

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH
    "The Netherlands has some ethnic tensions of its own. In recent years, incidents could have easily escalated into more serious turmoil......."

    So this proves that there is ethnic tension in Netherlands and that it takes a special model of policing and a welfare state to diffuse tensions. Multiracial/multicultural societies are inherently unstable and dystopian.
  102. @Junior

    Most of the white riots you cited happened 100 or more years ago and were not orchestrated by “Zionists” which is a term used by people who are too cowardly to say Jews.
     
    The Zionists orchestrated the circumstances which brought about the Civil War. If you'll notice those riots all occur right around the time of President Jackson's shutting down of the second attempt of the Zionist Banksters Second Bank of the US and the years following it. This is no coincidence. The Banksters fueled the civil unrest much in the same as they are doing now in an attempt to cause Civil War, as they achieved with it back then. Back then it was to force us into not using debt free money, now it's for the stage of trying to cause Racial Riots to bring about there Global Governance. They have been trying to destroy America since it's inception.

    The term Zionist is used because not all Jewish People are involved in this conspiracy. Unlike people who like to paint with a broadbrush to try to make it easier to identify, I choose to correctly identify instead of going the more convenient incorrect route. The cowards are the people that choose to be incorrect because it's easier for them.


    The citations also lack context and imply that whites were mindless savages just like the contemporary negro once upon a time. The white riots took place long before the white man became brainwashed and denatured and were often in retaliation for violence and depredations committed by the blacks. The purpose was usually to deter blacks from further bad behavior against whites which almost always had the desired effect.
     
    This statement is pure rationalizations and excuse making. If you replace the word "White" with the word "Black" in it, you will see that rationalizations is exactly what it is. Here's what I mean: "The media reports of today also lack context and imply that blacks are mindless savages just like the past whites of once upon a time. The black riots are taking place since the black man has become brainwashed and denatured and are often in retaliation for violence and depredations committed by the whites. The purpose is usually to deter whites from further bad behavior against blacks which almost always has not had the desired effect."

    Blacks, otoh, always burn down their own neighborhoods and business districts when they feel whitey has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism.
     
    I agree completely that burning down your own neighborhood is sheer stupidity, but it must be noted that this is the result of politicians that have their Police force allow for the rioting and instead of breaking it up, they keep it boxed in those neighborhoods with police lines protecting the neighborhoods they deem worthy. I'd also like to point out that your statement can again be said for whites to point out to you that it is a condition of the whole human race not one particular race: "Whites, otoh, always burn down their own sports stadiums, concert venues and business districts when they feel the opposing team that beat their team, a referee, or Guns & Roses not showing up for the concert has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism."

    As the Dead Kennedys explained the sheer stupidity of it in their INCREDIBLE song Riot:

    But you get to the place
    Where the real slave-drivers live
    It's walled off by the riot squad aiming guns right at your head
    So you turn right around
    And play right into their hands
    And set your own neighborhood
    Burning to the ground instead

    Riot, the unbeatable high
    Riot, shoots your nerves to the sky
    Riot, playing right into their hands
    Tomorrow you're homeless, tonight it's a blast?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF7e2rgzsrU


    True, there are Zionist machinations today, but if you’re trying to argue that without them blacks and whites would be getting along wonderfully that’s totally false evidenced by the violent conflict that regularly occurred between the two races long before the Zionist stranglehold on much of the white, Western world. Racial differences are real, not artificial, and they are easy to exploit by the string pullers.
     
    I agree completely with the statement that racial differences are easily exploited by the string pullers, but your statement beforehand about races not being able to get along is totally false as is evidenced by countries such as the most densely populated country in the world, the Netherlands where you see different races coexisting in relative peace with basically the same percentages as in the US. "Ethnic groups: Over 81,7% of the population are Dutch (Germanic and Gallo-Celtic stock), other 18,3% (of which 9% are non-western origin mainly Turks, Moroccans, Antilleans, Surinamese and Indonesians) (1999 est.)"
    http://www.amsterdam.info/netherlands/population

    The only thing that can bring peace and stability is the racial partition of the USA.
     
    I'd like to counter that with the fact that it's a moot point because there won't be ANY USA unless we all come together as Americans to free ourselves from our "Elite" slavemasters. I say, let's get our priorities straight and then we can figure out how to fix our racial issues that the string pullers have exploited.

    The Zionists orchestrated the circumstances which brought about the Civil War. If you’ll notice those riots all occur right around the time of President Jackson’s shutting down of the second attempt of the Zionist Banksters Second Bank of the US and the years following it. This is no coincidence.

    Zionism didn’t come into being until 1896. The civil war took place between 1861 and 1865 or 35 years before Zionism. Andrew Jackson served as president from 1829 to 1837. The first riot you cited occurred in 1824 while the second riot occurred in 1841, so a causal link cannot be established and this is speculation.

    Are you arguing that there were pre-Zionism “Zionists” who orchestrated the riots to dissuade Jackson from shutting down the second central bank?

    The term Zionist is used because not all Jewish People are involved in this conspiracy. Unlike people who like to paint with a broadbrush to try to make it easier to identify,…..

    Not all Jews are Zionists but all Zionists are Jews. And anti-Zionist Jews appear to be in the minority and their opposition to Zionists and Zionism largely ineffectual.

    I agree completely that burning down your own neighborhood is sheer stupidity, but it must be noted that this is the result of politicians that have their Police force allow for the rioting and instead of breaking it up, they keep it boxed in those neighborhoods with police lines protecting the neighborhoods they deem worthy.

    The police are always heavily outnumbered by the rioters so there’s nothing stopping some or many black rioters from slipping through any net and rioting in non-black neighborhoods. In order to stop the rioting the police would need to shoot dozens of black rioters which would be decried as racism, police brutality, white supremacism ad infinitum and the police would have their lives destroyed.

    “Whites, otoh, always burn down their own sports stadiums, concert venues and business districts when they feel the opposing team that beat their team, a referee, or Guns & Roses not showing up for the concert has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism.”

    Cite when and where whites have burned down their own sports stadiums, concert venues and business districts with the same frequency to what blacks have been doing since 1965 and in L.A. in 1992, Cincinnati in 2001, Ferguson in 2014 and Baltimore in 2015.

    I agree completely with the statement that racial differences are easily exploited by the string pullers, but your statement beforehand about races not being able to get along is totally false as is evidenced by countries such as the most densely populated country in the world, the Netherlands where you see different races coexisting in relative peace with basically the same percentages as in the US.

    The Netherlands is approximately 80% white while the USA is 62% white. Nevertheless, the Netherlands has had some problems associated with multiculturalism which will only worsen as the native Dutch decline relative to the Muslims and non-whites.

    I’d like to counter that with the fact that it’s a moot point because there won’t be ANY USA unless we all come together as Americans to free ourselves from our “Elite” slavemasters.

    That’s heartwarming but most non-whites identity with their race first and their nation second, if at all. For it was none other than black Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Obama’s spiritual mentor who thundered “God Damn America!!!” from his bully pulpit.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Junior

    Zionism didn’t come into being until 1896.
     
    Contrary to what they have people believe, the first Zionist was a man called Sabbatai Zevi from the 17th century but he was followed by many others:

    "Modern Zionism has its roots in a 17th century false Jewish messiah by the name of Sabbatai Zevi who claimed to be the promised savior of the Jews that has come to establish the Jewish kingdom in the promised land known then as Palestine."
    http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2005/05may/zionismorigin.html

    Zevi's Shabbataism is what the Donmeh are that control Turkey. Zevi also inspired the Frankists.

    ""the Shabbatai followers continued their hidden life in the Turkish sect of the Donmeh, whose activities continue to this day, as reported extensively this year, even by the straid Jerusalem Post. One of the Donmeh followers was Jacob Frank (1726-1726), who would transform Europe and the world into a Shabbataian hell barely a century later." Jacob Frank succeeded Rebbe Berechiah and in eighteen century brought the Donmeh ideaology To Europe. He made an alliance near/in Frankfurt, Germany, with Jesuit Adam Weinhaupt (founder of the Illuminatti and the usurper of the Freemasonic lodges worldwide, specially that of England and Scotland) and the Rothschild empire."
    http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2005/05may/zionismorigin.html

    "In 1697 Rabbi Judah he-Hasid led 1,500 Ashkenazim from his native Poland, Germany, and Moravia; five hundred died before they reached the holy city of Jerusalem on October 14, 1700."
    http://san.beck.org/16-6-PalestineandZionism.html

    "In the 1700s, more than a century preceding the Zionist movement, relatively large numbers of Jews from Eastern Europe moved to the Land of Israel. They were basically either disciples of the Gaon of Vilna or the Baal Shem Tov, founder of Chassidism. Their motives were purely religious. They felt that the time of redemption was at hand and by populating the Holy Land they would somehow quicken the Messiah’s arrival."
    http://www.jewishhistory.org/the-first-aliyah/

    They may not have called it Zionism, much in the same way that early Christians didn't call themselves Christians, but Zionists(although not a religion like Christianity) are exactly what they were.

    Andrew Jackson served as president from 1829 to 1837. The first riot you cited occurred in 1824 while the second riot occurred in 1841, so a causal link cannot be established and this is speculation.

    Are you arguing that there were pre-Zionism “Zionists” who orchestrated the riots to dissuade Jackson from shutting down the second central bank?
     
    My point is that Jackson shut down the second bank in 1836. In 1841 President Tyler vetoed the act renewing the charter for the Bank. All hell breaks loose following this veto in 1841. The Banksters caused massive economic turmoil in the US which led to rioting and Blacks were the scapegoat. You are correct that it is speculation because we have no documentation from the Rothschild Zionist Banksters that this was their plan but we do know that there is a direct correlation between economic circumstances and social unrest and the Banksters caused the circumstances.

    Another important point in this timeline is in 1833, when Jackson started his second term which he campaigned on ending the bank, the newspaper The Sun(The New York Sun) and in 1941 when Tyler vetoed the renewal, the New York Tribune began putting out massive amounts of propaganda all across America with often sensationalized made up stories to cause civil unrest. These propaganda machines of the Zionists along with their causing of financial crisis contributed immensely to civil unrest much in the same as it is today.

    1830's: Beginning with THE NEW YORK SUN in 1833, papers took a turn towards reportage, seeking commercial success and mass readership. Advances in printing and papermaking technology led to an explosion of newspaper growth, the emergence of the "Penny Press." Costing a penny an issue, rather than the usual six cents, penny papers aggressively sought out local news, assigning reporters to the courts and to the coverage of "society."

    1841: Horace Greeley launched THE NEW YORK TRIBUNE, which quickly reached a circulation of 10,000, was strongly antislavery, and as a reform-minded journal of ideas, reported on women's rights, socialist experiments, temperance, and other reforms. In his autobiography, RECOLLECTIONS OF A BUSY LIFE, 1869, Greeley explained, "I founded the New York Tribune as a journal removed alike from servile partisanship on the one hand and from gagged and mincing neutrality on the other." By the 1850's the TRIBUNE surpassed 250,000 in circulation and was widely influential throughout the North and West. Using his paper as a platform to reach a large audience, Greeley mounted editorial attacks on the Fugitive Slave Act, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Dred Scott decision.
     
    http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/mediahistory.html

    Now I'm not saying that the result of ending slavery was bad, but I do however question their motives behind it.

    Cite when and where whites have burned down their own sports stadiums, concert venues and business districts with the same frequency to what blacks have been doing since 1965 and in L.A. in 1992, Cincinnati in 2001, Ferguson in 2014 and Baltimore in 2015.
     
    Oh come on. You know that white people riot all the time over sports team losses and even winning. And I won't even BEGIN to get into the Hooliganism in European soccer matches.

    http://www.alternet.org/11-stupid-reasons-white-people-have-rioted

    My point was not one of frequency but of capability. But if you want to see a listing of all the riots by white people in America compared to the 20(estimate) Black ones you listed, here's a list of them all. Sorry I lost count after 100 of the American ones.

    https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots#18th_century

    That’s heartwarming but most non-whites identity with their race first and their nation second, if at all.
     
    I agree that people not putting America first is the problem.
  103. @Junior

    as is evidenced by countries such as the most densely populated country in the world, the Netherlands where you see different races coexisting in relative peace with basically the same percentages as in the US.
     
    Forgot to expound on this extremely important example of the races coexisting in relative peace in the Netherlands and why they are:

    While other Western countries have been the scene of ethnic riots, the Netherlands remained quiet. According to one new study, the Dutch have their police to thank for it.

    How has the Netherlands managed to escaped large-scale ethnic riots, wondered researcher Otto Adang and two of his colleagues. On Monday, Adang, who teaches public order and threat control at the Apeldoorn police academy, presented his findings to the acting minister of home affairs, Ernst Hirsch Ballin. The report titled Are we different? tries to explain why the rise in immigration, and tensions accompanying it, hasn’t led to an explosion.

    Knowing what lies behind the absence of ethnic riots in the Netherlands is important, said Adang, because some have warned they could happen any moment. "With reason," Adang said. "In a heavily polarised society, riots can easily break out."

    Other Western countries have seen their share of race riots. As recently as 2005, heavy rioting gripped the outer neighbourhoods of France’s major cities, but the first ethnic riots there took place in the 1970s. The UK, Belgium and the US have also been the scene of some violent ethnic rioting.

    Many incidents

    The Netherlands has some ethnic tensions of its own. In recent years, incidents could have easily escalated into more serious turmoil. A neighbourhood in the city of Gouda remained a hotbed of unrest long after a bus driver had been threatened in 2008, and his colleagues refused to traverse the neighbourhood.

    In Amsterdam's Slotervaart neighbourhood, emotions ran high after a Moroccan-Dutch man was shot and killed by a police officer in the same year he had stabbed both her and a colleague. Earlier this year, confrontations between youths of Moroccan and Moluccan descent rocked the rural town of Culemborg. The list of ethnic incidents goes on.

    "The reason for these ethnic riots lies largely in segregation and social-economic deprivation," Adang said. “Large scale immigration is a relatively recent phenomenon. We have ethnic neighbourhoods of course, but we don’t have ghettos like the US or the UK do. The Dutch social security system prevents extreme poverty." But that is not the only reason ethnic tensions may be milder in the Netherlands. Based on his research, Adang has concluded that the police also plays an important part.

    In general, two models for police action exist. In the repressive model, the police simply upholds the law by cracking down on violations. This type of police action is mainly directed at symptoms, not at underlying causes. The police force is an outsider in neighbourhoods, and it approaches residents as a group.

    In the second model of police action, police officers are familiar with a certain neighbourhood. Officers invest time and effort in their contacts with local residents and social organisations. They get in touch with mosques and social workers; they know the local priest and occasionally participate in neighbourhood meetings. In this model, police officers also uphold the law, but only through targeted action. Police officers are familiar with the peculiarities of ethnic groups, allowing them to respond adequately to problems.

    No dumb luck

    In the Netherlands, the police adopted the latter, network-oriented, approach as early as the 1980s. This helps to quell incipient riots, said Adang. "When trouble arises, they can fall back on their relationships. As a police officer, you have your sensors out in society. You can prevent escalation by using your network. It was more than dumb luck that we have avoided ethnic riots."

    According to Adang, investing in local work is the way to go. He wants this to get more attention both within the police and from politicians. Some experts he interviewed for his study said they could not rule out ethnic riots from taking place in the Netherlands in the future. At the same time, the tendency in recent years has been to emphasise repression and upholding of the law, Adang said. "Upholding the law is good. The police has cracked down on crime and anti-social behaviour. Nobody is against that,” he said.

    “But addressing people based on their group-membership instead of their behaviour doesn't work well. A police officer busy writing tickets and meeting targets can only spend part of this time maintaining relationships. The sense of balance is lost." The problem here, Adang said, is that there is no direct pay-off. "Connections only become valuable when trouble arises."

     

    http://vorige.nrc.nl/international/article2532816.ece/Absence_of_ethnic_violence_in_the_Netherlands_explained

    “The Netherlands has some ethnic tensions of its own. In recent years, incidents could have easily escalated into more serious turmoil…….”

    So this proves that there is ethnic tension in Netherlands and that it takes a special model of policing and a welfare state to diffuse tensions. Multiracial/multicultural societies are inherently unstable and dystopian.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Junior

    So this proves that there is ethnic tension in Netherlands and that it takes a special model of policing and a welfare state to diffuse tensions. Multiracial/multicultural societies are inherently unstable and dystopian.
     
    But this is due to CULTURAL differences, not due to Race.
    , @Junior
    And due to the huge influx of immigrants, as the article notes, that are not assimilating and overwhelming their system in the past few years.
  104. @utu
    "We replace empirical facts with arrogance. " - I gave you some empirical facts and you fail to comprehend them and their significance.

    But I like the rest of your comment as it implies a degree of self awareness. Good luck to you too.

    I can only leave you with this advice: Discerning distinctions is a very valuable skill.
    Live long and prosper.

    Read More
  105. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @KenH

    The Zionists orchestrated the circumstances which brought about the Civil War. If you’ll notice those riots all occur right around the time of President Jackson’s shutting down of the second attempt of the Zionist Banksters Second Bank of the US and the years following it. This is no coincidence.
     
    Zionism didn't come into being until 1896. The civil war took place between 1861 and 1865 or 35 years before Zionism. Andrew Jackson served as president from 1829 to 1837. The first riot you cited occurred in 1824 while the second riot occurred in 1841, so a causal link cannot be established and this is speculation.

    Are you arguing that there were pre-Zionism "Zionists" who orchestrated the riots to dissuade Jackson from shutting down the second central bank?


    The term Zionist is used because not all Jewish People are involved in this conspiracy. Unlike people who like to paint with a broadbrush to try to make it easier to identify,.....
     
    Not all Jews are Zionists but all Zionists are Jews. And anti-Zionist Jews appear to be in the minority and their opposition to Zionists and Zionism largely ineffectual.

    I agree completely that burning down your own neighborhood is sheer stupidity, but it must be noted that this is the result of politicians that have their Police force allow for the rioting and instead of breaking it up, they keep it boxed in those neighborhoods with police lines protecting the neighborhoods they deem worthy.
     
    The police are always heavily outnumbered by the rioters so there's nothing stopping some or many black rioters from slipping through any net and rioting in non-black neighborhoods. In order to stop the rioting the police would need to shoot dozens of black rioters which would be decried as racism, police brutality, white supremacism ad infinitum and the police would have their lives destroyed.

    “Whites, otoh, always burn down their own sports stadiums, concert venues and business districts when they feel the opposing team that beat their team, a referee, or Guns & Roses not showing up for the concert has wronged them. This is sheer stupidity and animalism.”
     
    Cite when and where whites have burned down their own sports stadiums, concert venues and business districts with the same frequency to what blacks have been doing since 1965 and in L.A. in 1992, Cincinnati in 2001, Ferguson in 2014 and Baltimore in 2015.

    I agree completely with the statement that racial differences are easily exploited by the string pullers, but your statement beforehand about races not being able to get along is totally false as is evidenced by countries such as the most densely populated country in the world, the Netherlands where you see different races coexisting in relative peace with basically the same percentages as in the US.
     
    The Netherlands is approximately 80% white while the USA is 62% white. Nevertheless, the Netherlands has had some problems associated with multiculturalism which will only worsen as the native Dutch decline relative to the Muslims and non-whites.

    I’d like to counter that with the fact that it’s a moot point because there won’t be ANY USA unless we all come together as Americans to free ourselves from our “Elite” slavemasters.
     
    That's heartwarming but most non-whites identity with their race first and their nation second, if at all. For it was none other than black Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Obama's spiritual mentor who thundered "God Damn America!!!" from his bully pulpit.

    Zionism didn’t come into being until 1896.

    Contrary to what they have people believe, the first Zionist was a man called Sabbatai Zevi from the 17th century but he was followed by many others:

    “Modern Zionism has its roots in a 17th century false Jewish messiah by the name of Sabbatai Zevi who claimed to be the promised savior of the Jews that has come to establish the Jewish kingdom in the promised land known then as Palestine.”
    http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2005/05may/zionismorigin.html

    Zevi’s Shabbataism is what the Donmeh are that control Turkey. Zevi also inspired the Frankists.

    “”the Shabbatai followers continued their hidden life in the Turkish sect of the Donmeh, whose activities continue to this day, as reported extensively this year, even by the straid Jerusalem Post. One of the Donmeh followers was Jacob Frank (1726-1726), who would transform Europe and the world into a Shabbataian hell barely a century later.” Jacob Frank succeeded Rebbe Berechiah and in eighteen century brought the Donmeh ideaology To Europe. He made an alliance near/in Frankfurt, Germany, with Jesuit Adam Weinhaupt (founder of the Illuminatti and the usurper of the Freemasonic lodges worldwide, specially that of England and Scotland) and the Rothschild empire.
    http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2005/05may/zionismorigin.html

    [MORE]

    “In 1697 Rabbi Judah he-Hasid led 1,500 Ashkenazim from his native Poland, Germany, and Moravia; five hundred died before they reached the holy city of Jerusalem on October 14, 1700.”
    http://san.beck.org/16-6-PalestineandZionism.html

    “In the 1700s, more than a century preceding the Zionist movement, relatively large numbers of Jews from Eastern Europe moved to the Land of Israel. They were basically either disciples of the Gaon of Vilna or the Baal Shem Tov, founder of Chassidism. Their motives were purely religious. They felt that the time of redemption was at hand and by populating the Holy Land they would somehow quicken the Messiah’s arrival.”
    http://www.jewishhistory.org/the-first-aliyah/

    They may not have called it Zionism, much in the same way that early Christians didn’t call themselves Christians, but Zionists(although not a religion like Christianity) are exactly what they were.

    Andrew Jackson served as president from 1829 to 1837. The first riot you cited occurred in 1824 while the second riot occurred in 1841, so a causal link cannot be established and this is speculation.

    Are you arguing that there were pre-Zionism “Zionists” who orchestrated the riots to dissuade Jackson from shutting down the second central bank?

    My point is that Jackson shut down the second bank in 1836. In 1841 President Tyler vetoed the act renewing the charter for the Bank. All hell breaks loose following this veto in 1841. The Banksters caused massive economic turmoil in the US which led to rioting and Blacks were the scapegoat. You are correct that it is speculation because we have no documentation from the Rothschild Zionist Banksters that this was their plan but we do know that there is a direct correlation between economic circumstances and social unrest and the Banksters caused the circumstances.

    Another important point in this timeline is in 1833, when Jackson started his second term which he campaigned on ending the bank, the newspaper The Sun(The New York Sun) and in 1941 when Tyler vetoed the renewal, the New York Tribune began putting out massive amounts of propaganda all across America with often sensationalized made up stories to cause civil unrest. These propaganda machines of the Zionists along with their causing of financial crisis contributed immensely to civil unrest much in the same as it is today.

    1830′s: Beginning with THE NEW YORK SUN in 1833, papers took a turn towards reportage, seeking commercial success and mass readership. Advances in printing and papermaking technology led to an explosion of newspaper growth, the emergence of the “Penny Press.” Costing a penny an issue, rather than the usual six cents, penny papers aggressively sought out local news, assigning reporters to the courts and to the coverage of “society.”

    1841: Horace Greeley launched THE NEW YORK TRIBUNE, which quickly reached a circulation of 10,000, was strongly antislavery, and as a reform-minded journal of ideas, reported on women’s rights, socialist experiments, temperance, and other reforms. In his autobiography, RECOLLECTIONS OF A BUSY LIFE, 1869, Greeley explained, “I founded the New York Tribune as a journal removed alike from servile partisanship on the one hand and from gagged and mincing neutrality on the other.” By the 1850′s the TRIBUNE surpassed 250,000 in circulation and was widely influential throughout the North and West. Using his paper as a platform to reach a large audience, Greeley mounted editorial attacks on the Fugitive Slave Act, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Dred Scott decision.

    http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/mediahistory.html

    Now I’m not saying that the result of ending slavery was bad, but I do however question their motives behind it.

    Cite when and where whites have burned down their own sports stadiums, concert venues and business districts with the same frequency to what blacks have been doing since 1965 and in L.A. in 1992, Cincinnati in 2001, Ferguson in 2014 and Baltimore in 2015.

    Oh come on. You know that white people riot all the time over sports team losses and even winning. And I won’t even BEGIN to get into the Hooliganism in European soccer matches.

    http://www.alternet.org/11-stupid-reasons-white-people-have-rioted

    My point was not one of frequency but of capability. But if you want to see a listing of all the riots by white people in America compared to the 20(estimate) Black ones you listed, here’s a list of them all. Sorry I lost count after 100 of the American ones.

    https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots#18th_century

    That’s heartwarming but most non-whites identity with their race first and their nation second, if at all.

    I agree that people not putting America first is the problem.

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH
    Since early Zionism was concerned only with a homeland for Jews, I'm still not convinced that it had anything to do with the rioting you cited. Central banking and the recessions that it can bring was probably only a tangential cause at best. I would need to study each riot in some detail which I don't have time to do, but it seems you are an economic determinist and that you believe all major events are economic in origin so you overlook critical evidence that may exist to the contrary such as the reality of race and the immutability of racial differences.

    People try to dismiss race and attribute the problems to culture, but different races create cultures unique to their racial mentalities which is why many non-white, third world immigrants to America roundly reject American culture because it is alien to them. Europe is experiencing the same problems with non-white, mostly Muslim immigrants.


    Oh come on. You know that white people riot all the time over sports team losses and even winning. And I won’t even BEGIN to get into the Hooliganism in European soccer matches.
     
    Your first link proved that some whites, usually drunk and immature college kids, act stupid and do stupid things but nowhere is there an example of mobs of whites burning down sports stadiums, concert halls and business districts as you originally claimed. Or killing and injuring dozens of people in the process as often happens when blacks go postal over a black criminal getting killed. At most it seems like a few overturned cars, some bonfires, shouting at cops and throwing beer bottles.

    Even the youtube link in the alternet story regarding the 1998 Denver "riot" admitted it wasn't much of a riot and that as soon as cops sprayed tear gas the people scattered and went home. Other footage shows smiling fans next to bonfires drinking beverages, presumably alcoholic. A far cry from scowling blacks busting windows to stores and setting fire to everything. Possibly the Hunington Beach riots might qualify as animalistic but nobody got seriously injured or killed.

    I'm not defending anything these whites did but it falls far short of the damage, death and destruction wrought by black rioting of the 1960's till today.

  106. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @KenH
    "The Netherlands has some ethnic tensions of its own. In recent years, incidents could have easily escalated into more serious turmoil......."

    So this proves that there is ethnic tension in Netherlands and that it takes a special model of policing and a welfare state to diffuse tensions. Multiracial/multicultural societies are inherently unstable and dystopian.

    So this proves that there is ethnic tension in Netherlands and that it takes a special model of policing and a welfare state to diffuse tensions. Multiracial/multicultural societies are inherently unstable and dystopian.

    But this is due to CULTURAL differences, not due to Race.

    Read More
  107. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @KenH
    "The Netherlands has some ethnic tensions of its own. In recent years, incidents could have easily escalated into more serious turmoil......."

    So this proves that there is ethnic tension in Netherlands and that it takes a special model of policing and a welfare state to diffuse tensions. Multiracial/multicultural societies are inherently unstable and dystopian.

    And due to the huge influx of immigrants, as the article notes, that are not assimilating and overwhelming their system in the past few years.

    Read More
  108. From Associated Press “sympathetic whites are helping to fuel racial change.”

    Wonder if these folks did or did not get Ashleigh Shackelford’s “For White People Who Want to Attend #BlackLivesMatter Protests”: “Nothing you have is yours. Let me be clear: Nothing you have is yours. … So if you’re not willing to talk money, you are not here for #BlackLivesMatter as a movement or for us as individuals.”

    AP Article at:

    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_POLICE_SHOOTINGS_WHITE_SYMPATHY?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

    Read More
  109. @Junior

    Zionism didn’t come into being until 1896.
     
    Contrary to what they have people believe, the first Zionist was a man called Sabbatai Zevi from the 17th century but he was followed by many others:

    "Modern Zionism has its roots in a 17th century false Jewish messiah by the name of Sabbatai Zevi who claimed to be the promised savior of the Jews that has come to establish the Jewish kingdom in the promised land known then as Palestine."
    http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2005/05may/zionismorigin.html

    Zevi's Shabbataism is what the Donmeh are that control Turkey. Zevi also inspired the Frankists.

    ""the Shabbatai followers continued their hidden life in the Turkish sect of the Donmeh, whose activities continue to this day, as reported extensively this year, even by the straid Jerusalem Post. One of the Donmeh followers was Jacob Frank (1726-1726), who would transform Europe and the world into a Shabbataian hell barely a century later." Jacob Frank succeeded Rebbe Berechiah and in eighteen century brought the Donmeh ideaology To Europe. He made an alliance near/in Frankfurt, Germany, with Jesuit Adam Weinhaupt (founder of the Illuminatti and the usurper of the Freemasonic lodges worldwide, specially that of England and Scotland) and the Rothschild empire."
    http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2005/05may/zionismorigin.html

    "In 1697 Rabbi Judah he-Hasid led 1,500 Ashkenazim from his native Poland, Germany, and Moravia; five hundred died before they reached the holy city of Jerusalem on October 14, 1700."
    http://san.beck.org/16-6-PalestineandZionism.html

    "In the 1700s, more than a century preceding the Zionist movement, relatively large numbers of Jews from Eastern Europe moved to the Land of Israel. They were basically either disciples of the Gaon of Vilna or the Baal Shem Tov, founder of Chassidism. Their motives were purely religious. They felt that the time of redemption was at hand and by populating the Holy Land they would somehow quicken the Messiah’s arrival."
    http://www.jewishhistory.org/the-first-aliyah/

    They may not have called it Zionism, much in the same way that early Christians didn't call themselves Christians, but Zionists(although not a religion like Christianity) are exactly what they were.

    Andrew Jackson served as president from 1829 to 1837. The first riot you cited occurred in 1824 while the second riot occurred in 1841, so a causal link cannot be established and this is speculation.

    Are you arguing that there were pre-Zionism “Zionists” who orchestrated the riots to dissuade Jackson from shutting down the second central bank?
     
    My point is that Jackson shut down the second bank in 1836. In 1841 President Tyler vetoed the act renewing the charter for the Bank. All hell breaks loose following this veto in 1841. The Banksters caused massive economic turmoil in the US which led to rioting and Blacks were the scapegoat. You are correct that it is speculation because we have no documentation from the Rothschild Zionist Banksters that this was their plan but we do know that there is a direct correlation between economic circumstances and social unrest and the Banksters caused the circumstances.

    Another important point in this timeline is in 1833, when Jackson started his second term which he campaigned on ending the bank, the newspaper The Sun(The New York Sun) and in 1941 when Tyler vetoed the renewal, the New York Tribune began putting out massive amounts of propaganda all across America with often sensationalized made up stories to cause civil unrest. These propaganda machines of the Zionists along with their causing of financial crisis contributed immensely to civil unrest much in the same as it is today.

    1830's: Beginning with THE NEW YORK SUN in 1833, papers took a turn towards reportage, seeking commercial success and mass readership. Advances in printing and papermaking technology led to an explosion of newspaper growth, the emergence of the "Penny Press." Costing a penny an issue, rather than the usual six cents, penny papers aggressively sought out local news, assigning reporters to the courts and to the coverage of "society."

    1841: Horace Greeley launched THE NEW YORK TRIBUNE, which quickly reached a circulation of 10,000, was strongly antislavery, and as a reform-minded journal of ideas, reported on women's rights, socialist experiments, temperance, and other reforms. In his autobiography, RECOLLECTIONS OF A BUSY LIFE, 1869, Greeley explained, "I founded the New York Tribune as a journal removed alike from servile partisanship on the one hand and from gagged and mincing neutrality on the other." By the 1850's the TRIBUNE surpassed 250,000 in circulation and was widely influential throughout the North and West. Using his paper as a platform to reach a large audience, Greeley mounted editorial attacks on the Fugitive Slave Act, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Dred Scott decision.
     
    http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/mediahistory.html

    Now I'm not saying that the result of ending slavery was bad, but I do however question their motives behind it.

    Cite when and where whites have burned down their own sports stadiums, concert venues and business districts with the same frequency to what blacks have been doing since 1965 and in L.A. in 1992, Cincinnati in 2001, Ferguson in 2014 and Baltimore in 2015.
     
    Oh come on. You know that white people riot all the time over sports team losses and even winning. And I won't even BEGIN to get into the Hooliganism in European soccer matches.

    http://www.alternet.org/11-stupid-reasons-white-people-have-rioted

    My point was not one of frequency but of capability. But if you want to see a listing of all the riots by white people in America compared to the 20(estimate) Black ones you listed, here's a list of them all. Sorry I lost count after 100 of the American ones.

    https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots#18th_century

    That’s heartwarming but most non-whites identity with their race first and their nation second, if at all.
     
    I agree that people not putting America first is the problem.

    Since early Zionism was concerned only with a homeland for Jews, I’m still not convinced that it had anything to do with the rioting you cited. Central banking and the recessions that it can bring was probably only a tangential cause at best. I would need to study each riot in some detail which I don’t have time to do, but it seems you are an economic determinist and that you believe all major events are economic in origin so you overlook critical evidence that may exist to the contrary such as the reality of race and the immutability of racial differences.

    People try to dismiss race and attribute the problems to culture, but different races create cultures unique to their racial mentalities which is why many non-white, third world immigrants to America roundly reject American culture because it is alien to them. Europe is experiencing the same problems with non-white, mostly Muslim immigrants.

    Oh come on. You know that white people riot all the time over sports team losses and even winning. And I won’t even BEGIN to get into the Hooliganism in European soccer matches.

    Your first link proved that some whites, usually drunk and immature college kids, act stupid and do stupid things but nowhere is there an example of mobs of whites burning down sports stadiums, concert halls and business districts as you originally claimed. Or killing and injuring dozens of people in the process as often happens when blacks go postal over a black criminal getting killed. At most it seems like a few overturned cars, some bonfires, shouting at cops and throwing beer bottles.

    Even the youtube link in the alternet story regarding the 1998 Denver “riot” admitted it wasn’t much of a riot and that as soon as cops sprayed tear gas the people scattered and went home. Other footage shows smiling fans next to bonfires drinking beverages, presumably alcoholic. A far cry from scowling blacks busting windows to stores and setting fire to everything. Possibly the Hunington Beach riots might qualify as animalistic but nobody got seriously injured or killed.

    I’m not defending anything these whites did but it falls far short of the damage, death and destruction wrought by black rioting of the 1960′s till today.

    Read More
  110. I wonder, after the election, Hillary might think, “maybe White Lives matter”?

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
While other top brass played press agents for the administration’s war, William Odom told the truth about Iraq—though few listened.
A thousand years of meritocracy shaped the Middle Kingdom.