The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Robert Weissberg Archive
Why Is the Alt-Right So Threatening?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Alt-Right Leader Richard Spencer
Alt-Right Leader Richard Spencer

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Even in today’s acrimonious political landscape, nothing seems to draw as much vitriol as the minuscule “Alt-Right” (shorthand for an alternative to mainstream Conservatism Inc.). Indeed, if America’s political class organized 1984-style two-minute hates, the Alt-Right would be the star of the show with Richard Spencer substituting for Emmanuel Goldstein.

Given this aversion across the ideological spectrum, one might surmise that the Alt-Right embraced doctrines totally antithetical to core American values. Not quite. In at least in one key regard, the Alt-Right is as American as apple pie.

This apparent oddity flows from the movement’s paramount goal: preserving United States as a white ethno state, a nation with shared heritage, a single language and common biological ancestry. Ironically given the accusations of Alt-Right anti-Semitism, Israel with its total commitment to its Jewish identity is often heralded as the model for such a state.

Central to their advocacy is the belief, putatively supported by both Darwinian evolutionary biology and everyday plain-to-see facts, that racial and ethnic groups differ by nature and these inherited traits persist across generations and go beyond physical attributes like skin color to include multiple behaviors–educational achievement, criminality, work ethic, and patterns of family life among many, many others. Humans are not blank slates.

According to the Alt-Right world view, if a hundred thousand people of sub-Sahara African ancestry and an equal number of those of European stock were supplied with identical resources in comparable environments, after a few decades the two resulting community would diverge sharply in predictable ways. Doubters might just visit Portland, OR and Detroit MI. It is biology that makes today’s Scandinavian farmers in Minnesota closely resemble their Swedish and Norwegian ancestors despite 160 years of physical separation. Transporting Third Worlders to a First World setting would not substantially transform the new arrivals though these immigrants might relish the technological gadgets of their new home.

When stated boldly, this view of deeply ingrained, enduring genetic traits not amenable to social engineering totally contravenes America’s dominant public orthodoxy. It explicitly rejects the honored “self-evident” principle that America is a propositional nation where everyone—whether from Sudan or Sweden—can become a 100% “real red blooded American” by embracing our principles and values. It then follows, at least among those of the Alt-Right persuasion, that if the white European population grows proportionally smaller, either from low fertility or via Third World immigration, America as it currently exists will vanish and conceivably be transformed into something politically and culturally closer to Brazil.

The Alt-Right thus opposes immigration from non-Western nations, resists government efforts to impose ethnic/racial mixing (e.g., school integration, scattered site housing), and rejects the alleged benefits of diversity and multiculturalism. It champions freedom of association by restoring restrictive covenants, eliminating government anti-discrimation laws in housing and restaurants (the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in particular), and otherwise permitting Americans to escape those they want to avoid. Alt-Right adherents also condemn celebrating Cinco de Mayo, “pressing “2” for Spanish” on phone menus and bilingualism, in general, as un-American.

Now, what makes the Alt-Right’s White Nationalism American as Apple Pie? As Yogi Berra said, you can see a lot by just looking around. New York City where I live is a hotbed of racial liberalism and exalts racial and ethnic diversity, but a visiting Martian would conclude that Jim Crow laws were still on the books. Overwhelmingly, both private and public schools are highly segregated and, in fact, city public school administrators recently tried to enroll white children from affluent white families in the city’s über liberal West Side into a more “diverse” and less crowded nearby school. The (predictable) response was howls of outrage identical to what occurred during the forced racial integration in the South. Moreover, you will see scarcely any African Americans attending NY Philharmonic concerts, strolling through the Metropolitan Museum of Art or otherwise partaking of the city’s “high” culture. Nearly all residential neighborhoods are mono-racial/ethnic enclaves save for a few undergoing transition or gentrification. The City’s melting pot fantasy largely exists only in busses and subways.

New York City is hardly unique. Charles Murray’s fact-laden Coming Apart is only about white America but it deserves the subtitle How Affluent Whites Have Organized themselves into Racially Homogeneous Enclaves. One of Murray’s implications is that this burgeoning homogeneity is relatively new and, in all likelihood reflects the growing expansion of America’s non-white population.

The indisputable but almost unspeakable evidence abounds. Rich Benjamin in his Searching for Whitopia: An Improbable Journey to the Heart of White America took a nearly 27,000 mile journey across America visiting rapidly fast growing, nearly all-white small towns and exurban areas. Government has relentlessly tried to force diversity on its people but the response has been gated communities, restrictive zoning, high property taxes and similar ploys to maintain racial/ethnic homogeneity. Southern public schools have fought federal imposed racial integration to a standstill, often at considerable expense to white parents. Countless white Americans escape imposed diversity and enjoy vacations in resort towns that resemble America circa 1950, for example, Cape May, NJ or Door County, WI though few tourists may openly admit the lure of being totally surrounded by fellow whites.

Now for the awkward question: why are millions of white Americans, including nearly all political poobahs, pundits and the mass media talking heads, so averse to Alt-Right white nationalism when they themselves prefer small scale white ethno states?

ORDER IT NOW

Let me offer a speculative explanation. In an increasingly heterogeneous society where there is always a potential for internecine strife, prudence dictates permitting everyone (regardless of race or ethnicity) to create their own “private” ethno states, but caution also counsels the Mafia’s Omerta, the code of silence. Not even the liberal-dominated mass media will run stories of how real estate developers in cahoots with elected officials undermine residential diversity with under-the-radar “ethnic cleansing” by enticing large numbers of urban underclass blacks into suburban public housing (Ferguson, MO is one example). The only way a New Yorker might realize that whites are forcing out blacks in historically black Harlem is by reading reviews of new trendy restaurants and clubs in Harlem.

Into this Omerta comes the Alt-Right willing to speak the unspeakable: if we want America to be America, exclude low-IQ Syrian goat herders and wife beater with nine children who embrace a religion deeply incompatible with America’s core Christian principles. Alt-Right trouble-makers relish recounting grim tales of culturally indigestible immigrants or explaining how corporate America willingly destroys the country to attract cheap Third World labor all the while sending the clean-up bill—policing, welfare, medical care–to hapless, largely white taxpayers. The Alt-Righter resembles an un-socialized youngster who regularly blurts out the unspeakable, embarrassing truth.

And finally, there’s The Great Fear: this Alt-Right “virus” may escape the laboratory’s Petri dish and gain a modicum of political traction. Think Marine Le Pen and the National Front in France or, in Germany, Frauke Petry and the Alternative for Germany, two nationalist, anti-immigration parties that arrived out “of nowhere” and are now serious electoral players. After all, there is a demonstrable market for the idea of a white ethno state and an ambitious demagogue, perhaps a modern-day cleaned up George Wallace, could easily champion it. To be sure, an American National Party would be unlikely to capture any office, particularly under its current leadership, but it could peel off 5% or so of the popular vote as a protest vote in at least some states. Stranger things have happened so it is no wonder that the establishment obsesses over this tiny handful of heretics whose xenophobic views resonate with millions of deplorable Americans.

 
Hide 161 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /article/why-is-the-alt-right-so-threatening/#comment-1784331
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    Being Alt-Right isn’t enough.

    Alt-Righteousness is what matters.

    Read More
    • Replies: @pyrrhus
    But wait. According to Weissberg, you are "xenophobic" if you think a country should be run for the benefit of the people who built and maintain it, and its culture.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. The globalist oligarchy opposes and (successfully) forbids whites collectively defending their interests. How can one explain this?
    The most obvious one is that Jews (VERY committed to their own ethnic interests) have taken over leadership of the western world from whites and are determined to eliminate their major competitor for once and for all … via these kind of cultural mind wars. Oh, and by engineered mass immigration of Africans and Arabs into all (of what were once understood to be) white societies.

    Anyone got a better explanation?

    The only other possible explanation, as I see it, is that the invisible “oligarchy” driving global events are not primarily Jewish [they are certainly not ENTIRELY Jewish] but rather (for want of a better word) Satanists who, by definition, are entirely devoted to self-interest and who consider ordinary folk to be, at best, slaves and, at worst, an enemy to be systematically enslaved or destroyed. These Satanists, being very cunning, USE ‘The Jewish People’. They hide behind their amplified victimhood and use Jews, whenever possible, to front their criminal projects (in business, banking and government) in the public domain. So that if we turn on our masters we will attack only Jews and the entirely innocent ones (NEARLY ALL Jews who are merely brainwashed muppets like ourselves)

    Either way, the issue of who are are our warmongering diabolical rulers cannot be addressed without addressing this Jewish question. If Jews genuinely turn against their own leadership as Christ commanded them … we will all be saved. Without this collective Jewish change of heart it is hard to see anything but disaster on the horizon. One way or another.

    Jews need to ask themselves.
    This ‘Equality’, ‘Liberal’, ‘anti-Racist’ agenda to which we are all committed … are we committed because we LOVE ALL THE HUMAN RACE and will defend and protect universal rights? Or are we committed because we want to live in a society dominated by the globalist international bankers driving this Imperialist agenda.
    Do we REALLY love our neighbours or do we love the tyranny this hijacking of human moral conscience is actually manufacturing.
    Because it is “OUR” tyranny?
    The intention at the bottom (in Communist societies) can be sincere (if stupid). The intention at the top is always TOTALLY INSINCERE. The people at the top do not care about “equality” AT ALL!
    AT ALL!
    And sincerity (regarding spirituality and, please reflect on it, our eternal destiny) is everything.

    Read More
    • Agree: anarchyst, Robert Dunn
    • Replies: @Anonymouse
    "The globalist oligarchy opposes and (successfully) forbids whites collectively defending their interests. How can one explain this?
    The most obvious one is that Jews (VERY committed to their own ethnic interests) have taken over leadership of the western world from whites and are determined to eliminate their major competitor for once and for all … via these kind of cultural mind wars. Oh, and by engineered mass immigration of Africans and Arabs into all (of what were once understood to be) white societies.

    Anyone got a better explanation?"

    Yes. Political correctness and all that it implies and promotes was not invented by jews. PC is the current mode of the spirit of the times, its antecedents being the universal belief in value-free relativism that is taught everywhere to everyone. The commenter I am replying to is seeing conspiracy where there is no conspiracy.

    , @Clearpoint
    My answer would be the predatory workings of capitalism, in all its economic, political, social, educational and morally dogmatic aspects. For the elite minority who are pushing these diversity policies, this is a divide and conquer tactic, which is exactly the tactic you need to use when you are greatly outnumbered, and a tactic that goes back thousands of years. For both capitalism and Judaism, the strategy is that a united us will defeat a divided them no matter how greatly they outnumber us. Note how easily the Jewish elite join together with the gentile capitalist elite, and have common goals. There is a unity that transcends both systems.
    , @unpc downunder
    Better explanations:

    The left's shift to identity politics are allowed for an alliance between the liberal right and left with the aim of destroying populists, nationalists, traditionalists and old-school leftists who are opposed to economic and cultural globalisation

    Increasing urbanisation over the last century has had a liberalising effect on whites (most liberal whites live in big cities and most conservative whites live in small cities and towns and guess which side has the microphone).

    After the bloody anti-communism wars of the 50s and 60s, western elites decided to fight communism and promote capitalism by promoting free trade and open borders, rather than by direct military intervention.
    , @imbroglio
    Historically, when cultures falter and come apart, Jews are caught in the crossfire and are easy scapegoats largely because, as you say, they often front for the interests that care little for the common people. If you have experience of Jewish people, and it sounds as though you do, you realize that Jews, especially American Jews, are not monolithic. Jewish people, in increasing numbers, are losing their Jewish identity and assimilating into mainline white America at a rapid pace. Americans of partial Jewish ancestry are a rising proportion of the Jewish or, now, quasi-Jewish population.

    This is a problem for alt-right ethnicists. What's do be done with this people of mixed European race with traces, in many cases, of an ancient Aryan/Semitic admixture. The Jews are sui generis as the National Socialists well understood and fretted over. So you have an American Jewish population that, for the most part, lives like their white neighbors, thinks like their white neighbors, shares their white neighbors' values and, for all intents and purposes, have amalgamated with the white American "race" yet do not share, in all respects, the genetic makeup of the dominant white population.

    Prejudice will likely out, but for those of a broader view, what to make of the vanishing Jew? At a Burns Night supper in January, there were upwards of thirty Jewish men and women in attendance, the men in kilts and sporans, rising when the haggis was piped in, reciting the Selkirk Grace and behaving just like the American Scots in attendance. When asked what drew them to attend Burns Night, the reply was simply, "We love Robbie Burns." Interlopers? Or a people who feel it a privilege to be permitted to become a part of an America that many others are now happy to trash?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Amasius says:

    Richard Spencer’s take on the Trump speech:

    In a sane country HE’d be president. Or Duke would be president and he would be VP.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. A lot of food for thought in this article.
    On immigration, I find the progressive “blank cheque”/open slather views ridiculous. I resent especially the view that even questioning immigration is tantamount to racism. Regardless of WHERE immigrants come from, the quantity of yearly immigration is a technical question. A question that must be answered in reference to current/projected unemployment, business investment, infrastructure requirements & cultural institutions etc.
    Knowing this is anathema to many on Unz, I will still say that multiculturalism CAN work, IF it is done cautiously. You simply can not throw every — any ingredient into a pot & expect a great meal.
    All countries have a defining identity, an underlying culture. Every country has a right to maintain that culture.
    What I find annoying is, that progressives especially, can not understand this right to culture, to self definition. It is not, per se, a racial question. It could be an issue that QUANTITY may become QUALITY. With immigration absolute numbers DO count.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    I will still say that multiculturalism CAN work, IF it is done cautiously.

    Regardless of whether you are right or not, the real question is WHY would we want to make multiculturalism work? Why have multiculturalism at all?

    Why would a people bring another culture (another people) into their land and their lives? It can only lead to a weakening and/or dilution of your people and culture. It's a form of suicide.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. I do not know what the poet is trying to say!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. If the Alt Right is obsessed with IQ test score psychometrics…then the Alt Right will never be able to mobilize a Native Born White American Working Class revolt against the majority nonwhite Democratic Party. This I fear is the endgame for Richard Spencer’s fascination with Rusht0n-Lynn….irrelevancy.

    The IQ test score jibber-jabber is 100 percent irrelevant to mobilizing a very long overdue revolt against race-replacement immigration policy. Raise the IQ test score issue…and you have made race-replacement a debatable issue…which it is not. Same fatal flaw as the awfull immigration moratorium which reduces immigration to an economic policy issue:increase nonwhite legal immigration when the real wage starts to rise for The Historic Native Born White American Working Class…..insane…

    Since the case for not importing even one Asian Legal Immigrant is air-tight….the case against importing Hispanics and Muslims is equally air-tight:The Asians are not our racial kind…and they were a hardcore Barack Obama Democratic Party Voting Bloc 2008+2012..

    Jared Taylor has done terrible damage by obsessively waging the battle against Native Born White American race-replacement policy by heaving mountains of Social Science Studies at the Race Replacement Enthusiasts….Taylor is a fool…WTF…we need the approval of pointy headed Social Scientists before we can revolt against the open and deliberate policy of local and nation wide race-replacement of our People?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Yep. It's not IQ. It's about family. Races and ethnic groups are simply extended families. Whites are my people, my family.

    I don't want a white homeland or white enclaves within the U.S. because we're smarter than blacks. I want a white homeland and our own enclaves because I want to be with my own. Even if adding high-IQ Asians would improve the economies of such areas, I wouldn't want them because they aren't my people. (Would Israel accept a million 130+ IQ Chinese? Of course not.)

    I don't want to live among whites because I hate other groups. I want to live among whites because I love my people.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Escher says:

    For all their boorishness, they speak the truth. What gives America its unique identity is the White majority that settled and built this country, and that has (so far) embraced immigrants who were willing to assimilate and contribute.
    A “Tower of Babel” America will degenerate quickly into a continental empire held together by force, run by an oligarchy made up mostly of rich Whites, Jews and some Asians.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. If the Alt Right is threatening…it should be threatening and scary to the repellant, ugly, butch looking, old farting bulldyke and biological abnormality Rosie O’Donnell, because the Alt Right stands with Christian Russia!!!….no fucking apologies!!! God Bless Vladimir Putin and the Conservative Christian Russian People!!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace of Hearts
    You seemed to be obsessed with lesbians who may have gastrointestinal distress. Where does communism fit?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. If Trump’s civic nationalism fails, as I (sadly) think it will, more and more Whites will be attracted to the Alt-Right. Disaffected Whites are ripe for mobilization. Somewhere out there is a person or persons with the rhetorical skills of Huey Long and the organizational skills of Leon Trotsky.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  11. NickG says:

    Good piece.

    One small criticism…

    if the white European population grows proportionally smaller, either from low fertility or via Third World immigration,

    It’s not either or, it’s and!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. We are in a permanent state of war and must never assume that we have won. We are in the process of becoming united now and for the first time in my life I see a glimmer of hope. Rather than despair we must redouble our efforts. The outcome of a war can never be certain unless the enemy is annihilated completely, and this must be our objective to attack and defeat the liberal-socialist agenda in all of its guises. and never rest or relax our vigilance. Be sure our opponents think likewise and want us dead.
    I look at things in the perspective of my life. I was born in 1945. My upbringing was normal. Everything was normal. Then things started to go wrong, mass-immigration, and it has been going down hill ever since. Anti-racism laws, absolute equality, inclusion, positive discrimination, hate-crime laws, minority rights, the vibrant society, all immigration is good for the country, multiculturalism, vast integration projects, huge welfare costs, the welfare system in decline, appeasement, discrimination against the native majority, surrender to vile ideology.
    A collective insanity has gripped the so-called elite and the highly educated. Denial of self at all costs. Absolute equality the one guiding principle.

    Read More
    • Agree: The Anti-Gnostic
    • Replies: @Pumblechook
    It's an irony that the closer we move to becoming an actual minority, the more we will unite. I'm of the 1992 generation, so I was born into the thick of it - but I still feel hope for the future and even for my children.
    , @White European
    But, which is that "native majority" so many of you are talking about?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DHiUmSE2Do

    You could be "majority", but, certainly, not "native", none of you!
    , @Stonehands

    surrender to vile ideology.
     
    Amen, brother
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Jason Liu says:

    Perhaps deep down the leftists realize that desire for ethnic nationalism and homogeneity is basically the human norm, and one of, if not the most important political motivators throughout history.

    They tell themselves that “modern” values of pluralism and equality have superseded the ways of the past, but inside they suspect that humanity has not actually changed that much, and that their deeply held beliefs are actually a cult produced by naive 18th century European idealists who had no foresight or realistic understanding of human interactions.

    To see their own belief system crumble before their eyes, whether through white nationalism or their own aversion to the minorities, must cause a great cognitive dissonance for them. When people feel this way, they often double down on their erroneous beliefs, becoming more extreme as a way to combat their own inner doubts.

    This is why the angriest, most deranged leftists are often white people, because their leftism is an ideological devotion deeply enmeshed with their emotions, whereas minorities tend to support leftism for the more mundane and understandable reason of personal interest.

    Read More
    • Replies: @rtnl070818
    I think you've absolutely nailed it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Ironically given the accusations of Alt-Right anti-Semitism, Israel with its total commitment to its Jewish identity is often heralded as the model for such a state.

    This is the single biggest reservation I have about the Alt-Right: their seaming love affair with Zionism. Just because we American nationalists aspire to the same thing as the Zionists–sovereign control over our territory–does not automatically mean that we are ‘on the same side’, as some Alt-Righters seem to think. Whether Israel exists or not has almost no bearing on our existence and sovereignty. Israel, for me, is just another foreign country … and being a none-too-religious white Goy, I identify far, far more with the countries of Europe than with any Middle Eastern country.

    Moreover, some Alt-Righters seem to think they have a clever plot to turn the Zionists against the cultural-Marxist Jews. But in the end, who’ll be duping whom? In concrete terms, what are the Zionists going to do to help us white Goyim take back America from the cultmarx Jews? After all, don’t the Zionists themselves control our congress, along with a healthy chunk of finance and media? What interest would they conceivably have in giving that up? Remember what happened to the Christians a generation ago: ‘Oh, if only we try being nice to the Jews and praising Israel, then their media will be nice to us for a change and give us some help.’ So how did that turn out? From where I sit, the whole Moral Majority thing looks to have been an epic failure. Not only are they nowhere near restoring prayer in school, but now we have full-on homosexual marriage and even tranny bathrooms!

    I understand why some Alt-Righters would think of cultmarx Jews as a bigger danger than Zionists: it’s because the former cause most of their trouble at home, while the latter cause most of it overseas. But foreign policy ultimately affects us, too. And please remember that both factions of Jews control certain–and extensive–aspects of the domestic establishment in order to further their goals.

    It explicitly rejects the honored “self-evident” principle that America is a propositional nation where everyone—whether from Sudan or Sweden—can become a 100% “real red blooded American” by embracing our principles and values.

    I used to believe in that propositional-national stuff when I was a kid, too. But over the course of my life, I noticed that they just kept changing the propositions at their convenience (not ours!), and so I grew cynical and rejected the whole concept.

    Think Marine Le Pen and the National Front in France or, in Germany, Frauke Petry and the Alternative for Germany, two nationalist, anti-immigration parties that arrived out “of nowhere” and are now serious electoral players.

    That’s true of AfD, which was only founded in 2011, but it’s definitely not true of Front national, which was founded in 1972 and has been a force in French politics for about twenty years now.

    (Incidentally, I really hope Le Pen wins. If Europe has any hope at all, it’s France. And if France has any hope at all, it’s the FN.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jason Liu
    The alt-right does not really seek favors from Zionists, support for Zionism is the same as their support for nationalistic policies in Japan or the Philippines.

    Part of it is ideological allegiance, the other is that these states are assets and territories for nationalism in the fight against global leftism. The more nationalist states, the stronger the ideology, the further it spreads. There is tribalism based on race/ethnicity, and there is tribalism based on ideology. The world needs both.
    , @BenKenobi
    Don't think of Alt-Right praise of Israel and Zionism as trying to "cozy" up to the Tribe, or trying to "get them to go easy on us."

    It's a form of political judo. Philosemitic Nazis? That sound you hear is heads exploding.

    We just want to be more like the Jews, and follow their shining example.

    If anything, it's meant to turn up the heat on the Chosen. Take the BDS movement, for example. Those people already consider Israel to essentially be an apartheid White nation oppressing their brown population. We want to crank stuff like that up to eleven. An endorsement of Israel by the Alt-Right is meant to link the two brands in the minds of the diverse horde.

    The intersectionality of the oppressed has produced some very bizarre political alliances. Take radical feminists and radical Islam, for example. What we need is some intersectionality of the oppressors to produce an unlikely political alliance of our own.
    , @Art
    This is the single biggest reservation I have about the Alt-Right: their seaming love affair with Zionism.

    Breitbart is a pro-Israel Jew controlled organization. Part of the intended deception is to be called "anti-Semite."

    "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves" - Vladimir Lenin

    A Jew must always lead the Alt-right - the Alt-left - and the Alt-middle.

    The Jew leader will squash any anti-Jew speech.

    It is no more difficult to understand then that.

    Peace --- Art
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. bjdubbs says:

    [Typos fixed.]

    Weissberg is a professor and he misuses “adverse” and misspells “miniscule”?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Olaf
    He does neither.

    [Typos were fixed]
    , @MartinA
    Maybe Professor Weissberg still writes without a spellchecker? In this case it is commendable. Using a spellchecker hands the language over to central administration. Sooner or later they will start to manipulate it. Language is the gateway to the mind.

    (im not a native speaker so I probably do alot of spelling errors)

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. Renoman says:

    Let’s make a list of things created by sub Saharan Africans. It’s a very thin book. It’s not racism, it’s realism.

    Read More
    • LOL: Clyde
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Let’s make a list of things created by sub Saharan Africans.
     
    Better yet, let’s make a list of things NOT created by sub Saharan Africans.

    Here's a partial list to get us started: Churchill, Stalin, FDR, GWB, Netanyahu, Hillary and Billy, Obama, nuclear weapons, drones, Three Mile Island, Fukushima, Chernobyl, aircraft carriers, huge armies and navies, huge, grotesque bureaucracies, crippling worldwide debt, ignorant, loud mouth, dim-witted self-serving, world straddling politicians, a monstrously corrupt press, corporations that require special favors including massive infusions of other people's money (bailouts), wage slavery and endless wars, huge brainwashing bureaucracies posing as centers of education...

    Like I said, that's just the barest beginning.
    , @White trash
    Dance, music, sex, pretty important
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. mp says:

    Why is it threatening? The article hints, but beats too much around the bush. Just follow the money. Then find out who owns the money. Then consider the majority owner’s ethnic interests. It’s either that or maybe the Alt Right is just a front for Putin and his Russians. Yeah…that’s it. Now everyone can go back to watching television and drinking beer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  18. Actually the first non-native inhabitants of what became America were black Africans. Seventy nine years before the Jamestown Colony was attempted a Spanish colony in the Carolinas was abandoned but not before many African slaves had escaped. They went to live with the Indian tribes in the region and constitute the first non-aboriginal people to inhabit America.

    http://robertmagill.wordpress.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    Carolina? You're probably thinking of the Black Seminoles of Florida.
    , @pogohere
    More likely the first non-native inhabitants of the east coast of what became America trace back to at least as early as Erik the Red and his son Lief Eriksson, when the latter pursued the story told him by one Bjarni Herjolsson who claimed to have been blown off course while sailing from Iceland to Greenland in 986 CE. See G. Thompson's Victorious!, Queen's Champion--Prince Henry Sinclair, 2015, Misty Isles Press, Seattle, Internet Distributor: Lulu.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. Jason Liu says:
    @Seamus Padraig

    Ironically given the accusations of Alt-Right anti-Semitism, Israel with its total commitment to its Jewish identity is often heralded as the model for such a state.
     
    This is the single biggest reservation I have about the Alt-Right: their seaming love affair with Zionism. Just because we American nationalists aspire to the same thing as the Zionists--sovereign control over our territory--does not automatically mean that we are 'on the same side', as some Alt-Righters seem to think. Whether Israel exists or not has almost no bearing on our existence and sovereignty. Israel, for me, is just another foreign country ... and being a none-too-religious white Goy, I identify far, far more with the countries of Europe than with any Middle Eastern country.

    Moreover, some Alt-Righters seem to think they have a clever plot to turn the Zionists against the cultural-Marxist Jews. But in the end, who'll be duping whom? In concrete terms, what are the Zionists going to do to help us white Goyim take back America from the cultmarx Jews? After all, don't the Zionists themselves control our congress, along with a healthy chunk of finance and media? What interest would they conceivably have in giving that up? Remember what happened to the Christians a generation ago: 'Oh, if only we try being nice to the Jews and praising Israel, then their media will be nice to us for a change and give us some help.' So how did that turn out? From where I sit, the whole Moral Majority thing looks to have been an epic failure. Not only are they nowhere near restoring prayer in school, but now we have full-on homosexual marriage and even tranny bathrooms!

    I understand why some Alt-Righters would think of cultmarx Jews as a bigger danger than Zionists: it's because the former cause most of their trouble at home, while the latter cause most of it overseas. But foreign policy ultimately affects us, too. And please remember that both factions of Jews control certain--and extensive--aspects of the domestic establishment in order to further their goals.


    It explicitly rejects the honored “self-evident” principle that America is a propositional nation where everyone—whether from Sudan or Sweden—can become a 100% “real red blooded American” by embracing our principles and values.
     
    I used to believe in that propositional-national stuff when I was a kid, too. But over the course of my life, I noticed that they just kept changing the propositions at their convenience (not ours!), and so I grew cynical and rejected the whole concept.

    Think Marine Le Pen and the National Front in France or, in Germany, Frauke Petry and the Alternative for Germany, two nationalist, anti-immigration parties that arrived out “of nowhere” and are now serious electoral players.
     
    That's true of AfD, which was only founded in 2011, but it's definitely not true of Front national, which was founded in 1972 and has been a force in French politics for about twenty years now.

    (Incidentally, I really hope Le Pen wins. If Europe has any hope at all, it's France. And if France has any hope at all, it's the FN.)

    The alt-right does not really seek favors from Zionists, support for Zionism is the same as their support for nationalistic policies in Japan or the Philippines.

    Part of it is ideological allegiance, the other is that these states are assets and territories for nationalism in the fight against global leftism. The more nationalist states, the stronger the ideology, the further it spreads. There is tribalism based on race/ethnicity, and there is tribalism based on ideology. The world needs both.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Duncan Idaho
    Zionism wouldn't be so bad if:

    1. They did it on their own dime
    2. They didn't exercise an inordinate amount of influence on US policy
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. KenH says:

    New York City where I live is a hotbed of racial liberalism and exalts racial and ethnic diversity, but a visiting Martian would conclude that Jim Crow laws were still on the books.

    This supposed exaltation of racial diversity just means non-whites are a lot more equal of whites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  21. I’m not sure what the Alt-Right is, but it appears that what is being discussed here is racism. Racism is not threatening because it’s virtually non-existent and it has no future. Modern communications and travels make it look like an archaic superstition, and idiotic IQ-fetishism won’t persuade anyone. What I see here is nothing more substantial than a reaction to, and trolling of the PC-crazy liberals.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Saying racism has no future is like saying love of family has no future.

    Modern communications and travel will make racism more important in the future rather than less. Races and ethnic groups that don't defend their people will be over run by those that do via migration.
    , @SOL
    Says the guy sporting a Chinese monniker.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. @Renoman
    Let's make a list of things created by sub Saharan Africans. It's a very thin book. It's not racism, it's realism.

    Let’s make a list of things created by sub Saharan Africans.

    Better yet, let’s make a list of things NOT created by sub Saharan Africans.

    Here’s a partial list to get us started: Churchill, Stalin, FDR, GWB, Netanyahu, Hillary and Billy, Obama, nuclear weapons, drones, Three Mile Island, Fukushima, Chernobyl, aircraft carriers, huge armies and navies, huge, grotesque bureaucracies, crippling worldwide debt, ignorant, loud mouth, dim-witted self-serving, world straddling politicians, a monstrously corrupt press, corporations that require special favors including massive infusions of other people’s money (bailouts), wage slavery and endless wars, huge brainwashing bureaucracies posing as centers of education…

    Like I said, that’s just the barest beginning.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    Yours is an inapt analysis. Yes we created the mistakes of civilization. We also created the triumphs. This is true for all humans everywhere at all times.

    The remarkable thing about the Global South is its indigenous people's almost animal-like existence, with brutal skirmishes when there are too many males, vagaries of famine or disease, limited refinement of raw materials, etc. If or when the people from within the Hajnal lines disappear, they will sink back into hunter-gatherer or pastoralist existence.
    , @Inque Yutani
    Better better yet, lets make a list of things NOT created by dogs.

    Oh, look at that, same as your list.

    You're free to go live in a hut made out of shit and cholera with the rest of the noble peoples who don't perpetrate such evils upon the world.. No one is stopping you. No one will miss you.

    , @Stonehands
    ...But the love of wilderness is more than a hunger for what is always beyond reach; it is also an expression of loyalty to the earth, the earth which bore us and sustains us, the only home we shall ever know, the only paradise we ever need — if only we had the eyes to see. Original sin, the true original sin, is the blind destruction for the sake of greed of this natural paradise which lies all around us — if only we were worthy of it.
    - Edward Abbey
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. I was in Germany for eight months in the late 90′s. Visiting sites, historical and cultural, there were few if any black folks in evidence. Virtually all those blacks I did see were American GI’s. Yet there were hundreds/thousands of black military at the bases. Most of them, including officers, spent their leisure time at the clubs and bars. The availability of American tourist facilities almost everywhere notwithstanding.

    My wife and I have toured the US a bit the last two years. Bloody few blacks and third worlders were in evidence at our national parks and monuments. Most notable (and in Europe as well) were the busloads of Japanese almost everywhere.

    I live in what is accurately described as a black neighborhood, and have for 40 years. Fortunately single homes of middle class blacks. Yet it was refreshing to get into more ethnically homogeneous Euro-surroundings. As you might guess, many many of the whites at these places were of the SJW sort, along with their environmentalism and incredibly expensive hiking gear. I didn’t hear any of them complaining of the lack of “diversity.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. “When ‘Diversity’ means everyone MUST think alike about ‘diversity’, there is no diversity. Or freedom.” — very aware Canadian

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  25. pyrrhus says:
    @Anon
    Being Alt-Right isn't enough.

    Alt-Righteousness is what matters.

    But wait. According to Weissberg, you are “xenophobic” if you think a country should be run for the benefit of the people who built and maintain it, and its culture.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Robert Weissberg
    I would not judge wanting to be among whites and celebrating "white" culture xenophobic. That word is a slur. Rather, it is just normal for white people to want to be in a First World nation run by white people--things work, there is hardly any crime, streets are clean, people are polite and so on. In a draft version I mentioned how even white conservatives would not mind living in San Francisco despite is radical politics. Its all about civilization.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. @jacques sheete

    Let’s make a list of things created by sub Saharan Africans.
     
    Better yet, let’s make a list of things NOT created by sub Saharan Africans.

    Here's a partial list to get us started: Churchill, Stalin, FDR, GWB, Netanyahu, Hillary and Billy, Obama, nuclear weapons, drones, Three Mile Island, Fukushima, Chernobyl, aircraft carriers, huge armies and navies, huge, grotesque bureaucracies, crippling worldwide debt, ignorant, loud mouth, dim-witted self-serving, world straddling politicians, a monstrously corrupt press, corporations that require special favors including massive infusions of other people's money (bailouts), wage slavery and endless wars, huge brainwashing bureaucracies posing as centers of education...

    Like I said, that's just the barest beginning.

    Yours is an inapt analysis. Yes we created the mistakes of civilization. We also created the triumphs. This is true for all humans everywhere at all times.

    The remarkable thing about the Global South is its indigenous people’s almost animal-like existence, with brutal skirmishes when there are too many males, vagaries of famine or disease, limited refinement of raw materials, etc. If or when the people from within the Hajnal lines disappear, they will sink back into hunter-gatherer or pastoralist existence.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. I do beg for your indulgence for slightly taking different direction in my comment.
    My theory is this:
    Capitalistic society has two very different stages of development.
    Analysis of these stages must be done thoroughly and totally separately.
    First stage is functioning of capitalistic system in continuously expanding population.
    The second stage is functioning of capitalistic system in stagnation of population growth, and also relatively in negative population growth.

    In my opinion all western society are in second stage of capitalistic society, and all problems are arriving from this fact.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  28. HowardZ2 says:

    The ‘center’ or ‘mainstream’ is self-defined by people who want power and who want to use that power for their own benefit. When the lefty protesters were protesting against these rigged trade deals, they used a quote by one of the globalists that ‘there was no alternative’. The ‘center’ or ‘mainstream’ always tries to monopolize the convesation and pretend that there is no altertative to them grabbing power for themselves and making themselves fabulously wealthy.

    The ‘center’ or ‘mainstream’ thus regards as a major threat any group or movement. Since the ‘center’ is based on a propaganda campaign that tries to say that there is no alternative to them being powerful and wealthy and the rest of us working for them, they hate, attack and smear any group that tries to present an alternative vision.

    While the ‘center’ had the populist movements on the left well under control for the last decade, it turns out the populist rebellion erupted from the right. So, of course, the ‘center’ or ‘mainstream’ now hates the right and does everything to smear and discredit the uncontrolled populist movement on the right with the goal of trying to force everyone to again believe that the NY Times and CNN have a monopoly on truth and are the only ones to be listened to, read, watched and believed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. @jacques sheete

    Let’s make a list of things created by sub Saharan Africans.
     
    Better yet, let’s make a list of things NOT created by sub Saharan Africans.

    Here's a partial list to get us started: Churchill, Stalin, FDR, GWB, Netanyahu, Hillary and Billy, Obama, nuclear weapons, drones, Three Mile Island, Fukushima, Chernobyl, aircraft carriers, huge armies and navies, huge, grotesque bureaucracies, crippling worldwide debt, ignorant, loud mouth, dim-witted self-serving, world straddling politicians, a monstrously corrupt press, corporations that require special favors including massive infusions of other people's money (bailouts), wage slavery and endless wars, huge brainwashing bureaucracies posing as centers of education...

    Like I said, that's just the barest beginning.

    Better better yet, lets make a list of things NOT created by dogs.

    Oh, look at that, same as your list.

    You’re free to go live in a hut made out of shit and cholera with the rest of the noble peoples who don’t perpetrate such evils upon the world.. No one is stopping you. No one will miss you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Eustace Tilley (not)
    Not the same list.

    Dogs did not invent genital mutilation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. HowardZ2 says:

    So, instead of society debating the question of who has power, who runs things, who gets to be wealthy and comfortable and who has to be a poorly paid worker drone always being threatened with their job moving to China, the ‘center’ or ‘mainstream’ would much rather divert the discussion into talk about ‘claims’ of racism.

    Its a classic mis-direction tactic.

    The real fight is whether or not the world is ruled and run by and for the wall street bankers and the global elites with the rest of us just trying to survive by working to their benefit, or whether we have a free world where each of us can pursue life, liberty and the pursuits of happiness. Does Goldman-Sachs get to run everything and does the NY Times get to tell everyone what to think? Or do we have a free world where people can compete on a fair and even playing ground?

    That’s what this fight is about. And of course, since the NY Times realizes that they would lose a vote on whether or not only :) the elites should have a say in things or whether everyone should have a chance, they’d much rather get everyone talking about the supposed ‘racism of the alt-right’.

    Keep your eyes on the prize.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. Durandel says:

    For those who don’t really know what the Alt-Right is, please see the 16 points. It’s a big tent, but all the different groups in it, including Spencer’s, generally agree on these 16 points.

    And it is those points that will lead the Alt-Right to win, because it is in congruence with reality.

    What the Alt Right Is by Vox Day

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  32. You’re free to go live in a hut made out of shit and cholera with the rest of the noble peoples who don’t perpetrate such evils upon the world.

    You need to get out a bit more. And read some real history too.

    This is the 21st century and most intelligent folks reject propaganda for the dog doo that it is.

    PS, In any case, I’d rather live in a dung hut than downwind of Chernobyl or any of the other places made a wasteland by the self anointed ones.

    You can have your deranged Pyewtupia!

    PS: Been to Detroit lately? Even trump compares what’s going on in China, for example, with the the mostly derelict US, and ya know what? He’s correct!

    Trump compares US airports to ‘third-world country’

    http://thehill.com/policy/transportation/297935-trump-compares-us-airports-to-third-world-country

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  33. @animalogic
    A lot of food for thought in this article.
    On immigration, I find the progressive "blank cheque"/open slather views ridiculous. I resent especially the view that even questioning immigration is tantamount to racism. Regardless of WHERE immigrants come from, the quantity of yearly immigration is a technical question. A question that must be answered in reference to current/projected unemployment, business investment, infrastructure requirements & cultural institutions etc.
    Knowing this is anathema to many on Unz, I will still say that multiculturalism CAN work, IF it is done cautiously. You simply can not throw every -- any ingredient into a pot & expect a great meal.
    All countries have a defining identity, an underlying culture. Every country has a right to maintain that culture.
    What I find annoying is, that progressives especially, can not understand this right to culture, to self definition. It is not, per se, a racial question. It could be an issue that QUANTITY may become QUALITY. With immigration absolute numbers DO count.

    I will still say that multiculturalism CAN work, IF it is done cautiously.

    Regardless of whether you are right or not, the real question is WHY would we want to make multiculturalism work? Why have multiculturalism at all?

    Why would a people bring another culture (another people) into their land and their lives? It can only lead to a weakening and/or dilution of your people and culture. It’s a form of suicide.

    Read More
    • Agree: dc.sunsets
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Are we talking about the same thing? The point of multiculturalist doctrine I take to be that no attempt should be made to push assimilation. I remember a minor Jewish public intellectual working at the time for a conservative government saying multiculture was transitional, not to be expected to survive generations in Australia as Australians. And obviously you can't expect the first adult arrivals of a family of traditional Hindus or Coptic Christians or Muslims to assimilate. Then you have to start making all sorts of distinctions concerning numbers and tradeoffs. And it is hard to reject a tradeoff which encourages relatively high IQ immigration from diverse sources as Australia's current immigration policy imperfectly does when your native population is breeding dysgenically as Austraia's, though not as bad as Europe's, evidently is (cf. James Thompson's recent article - The Woodley Effect).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. The Alt White is threatening for the same reason Russia is threatening. It’s white. And it won’t be anybodies bitch. Now that the ruling class has openly declared war against the white race the Alt White sticks out like a sore thumb.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  35. @War for Blair Mountain
    If the Alt Right is obsessed with IQ test score psychometrics...then the Alt Right will never be able to mobilize a Native Born White American Working Class revolt against the majority nonwhite Democratic Party. This I fear is the endgame for Richard Spencer's fascination with Rusht0n-Lynn....irrelevancy.


    The IQ test score jibber-jabber is 100 percent irrelevant to mobilizing a very long overdue revolt against race-replacement immigration policy. Raise the IQ test score issue...and you have made race-replacement a debatable issue...which it is not. Same fatal flaw as the awfull immigration moratorium which reduces immigration to an economic policy issue:increase nonwhite legal immigration when the real wage starts to rise for The Historic Native Born White American Working Class.....insane...


    Since the case for not importing even one Asian Legal Immigrant is air-tight....the case against importing Hispanics and Muslims is equally air-tight:The Asians are not our racial kind...and they were a hardcore Barack Obama Democratic Party Voting Bloc 2008+2012..


    Jared Taylor has done terrible damage by obsessively waging the battle against Native Born White American race-replacement policy by heaving mountains of Social Science Studies at the Race Replacement Enthusiasts....Taylor is a fool...WTF...we need the approval of pointy headed Social Scientists before we can revolt against the open and deliberate policy of local and nation wide race-replacement of our People?

    Yep. It’s not IQ. It’s about family. Races and ethnic groups are simply extended families. Whites are my people, my family.

    I don’t want a white homeland or white enclaves within the U.S. because we’re smarter than blacks. I want a white homeland and our own enclaves because I want to be with my own. Even if adding high-IQ Asians would improve the economies of such areas, I wouldn’t want them because they aren’t my people. (Would Israel accept a million 130+ IQ Chinese? Of course not.)

    I don’t want to live among whites because I hate other groups. I want to live among whites because I love my people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Citizen of a Silly Country

    The Chinese in China aren't engaging the Tibetans and Uigurs in deep psychometric discussions about the research of Rushton....Lynne....Plomin...and Linda Gottfriefson...

    Nor are the Hindus in India engaging the Pakistanis in deep psychometric discussions about Rushton....Lynne...and Linda Gottfriedson's research when the issue of Kashmir comes up...
    , @Stonehands

    I want a white homeland and our own enclaves because I want to be with my own.
     
    It ain't gonna happen...

    White women go to college so they can take 30 cocks up the ass and redefine this as "empowerment."

    We are at war.

    A stable culture wont reappear until after the cleansing fire.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. @Mao Cheng Ji
    I'm not sure what the Alt-Right is, but it appears that what is being discussed here is racism. Racism is not threatening because it's virtually non-existent and it has no future. Modern communications and travels make it look like an archaic superstition, and idiotic IQ-fetishism won't persuade anyone. What I see here is nothing more substantial than a reaction to, and trolling of the PC-crazy liberals.

    Saying racism has no future is like saying love of family has no future.

    Modern communications and travel will make racism more important in the future rather than less. Races and ethnic groups that don’t defend their people will be over run by those that do via migration.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. woodNfish says:

    It is a normal part of being human to seek your own kind, economically, racially, and ethnically. In common language it is called communities. That is why as you travel this country you find white suburbs full of (shock!) white people, china towns full of Asians, Russian neighborhoods, Italian neighborhoods (Boston’s North End), latino communities, etc. Invariably, wherever you find blacks is usually run down and dangerous except, often government built welfare “projects” for where a few have escaped into other communities. There are some “integrated communities” in larger cities but they are rare, and if you travel through rural areas, they are almost all white.

    I find no problem with people wanting to be with their own kind. I am the same way. Leftists try to pretend otherwise, but it is a lie to try and make their dumbass selves feel better. See, leftists lie to everyone INCLUDING themselves.

    It is a shame blacks seem to be incapable of governing themselves, but they are, and they inflict their problems on everyone else. So the question isn’t whether or not human behavior is naturally racist, but why we put up with the problems caused by blacks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  38. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Yep. It's not IQ. It's about family. Races and ethnic groups are simply extended families. Whites are my people, my family.

    I don't want a white homeland or white enclaves within the U.S. because we're smarter than blacks. I want a white homeland and our own enclaves because I want to be with my own. Even if adding high-IQ Asians would improve the economies of such areas, I wouldn't want them because they aren't my people. (Would Israel accept a million 130+ IQ Chinese? Of course not.)

    I don't want to live among whites because I hate other groups. I want to live among whites because I love my people.

    Citizen of a Silly Country

    The Chinese in China aren’t engaging the Tibetans and Uigurs in deep psychometric discussions about the research of Rushton….Lynne….Plomin…and Linda Gottfriefson…

    Nor are the Hindus in India engaging the Pakistanis in deep psychometric discussions about Rushton….Lynne…and Linda Gottfriedson’s research when the issue of Kashmir comes up…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Its a long-standing Chinese tradition to respect the meritocracy of the examination system, to be honest. I will stand that we would probably be fine with any minority that does well in the gaokao - and indeed, minorities actually do get affirmative action to help them.

    I've nothing against ethnic nationalists, but I think its excessive to assume that China has the same attitude. While there may be some Han favorable concepts, the idea of the meritocracy has a long and storied tradition in Chinese history, myth and storytelling concept.

    One of the myths I grew up with was of a young boy during the dynastic era, who secretly listened to lessons and studied in spite of the incredible poverty of his parents, studying by candlelight at night. His dedication allows him to take the imperial examination, where he outpaces all of the rich bullies that once had harried him and in the end, is rewarded to become the governor over the province. The Confucian ideal of education and hard work is reinforced, though he goes a little blind for studying in the night.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. joe webb says:

    “Let me offer a speculative explanation. In an increasingly heterogeneous society where there is always a potential for internecine strife, prudence dictates permitting everyone (regardless of race or ethnicity) to create their own “private” ethno states, but caution also counsels the Mafia’s Omerta, the code of silence. ”

    “heterogeneous” the “genetic similarity” is contained in the word. Why fight nature anyway? O, for money.

    Very good point. Not sure what the end-game is in this scenario. Author states that France and Germany, and by implication all the other smaller Euro states are hatching their own versions of ethno-state politics. His word adjective choices I guess are ironic, like “xenophobic”, and this is fun. However, since xenophobic is the normal biological/genetic basis of social organization everywhere, especially if one broadens the term beyond race, then it is….

    incumbent upon the author to show us the difference between Europe and the US in the regard of his theoretical and unsubstantiated/analyzed view of just how we are different and why the US would be restricted to 5% while Europe is heading for 51% and more.

    The argument could be that the US is more democratic and anti-racist than Europe. I don’t know.
    Europe, especially France and Sweden, is screwier than the US in the regard of Egalite, especially race Equality… which may help one understand why “Identity” is the name of the racialist struggle in Europe, while in the US and Canada, race frankness is , while not acceptable in polite society, still fuels the coding of acceptable speech.

    Also, since Europe had outlawed free speech, and the US supports it….that may contribute to the campaign for , in effect, a white ethno -state in the US. “Omertà” as the gangster code of silence, and enforced by libs and conservative/Fox News with their own gangster Lose Your Job, etc. if not the similar Offer one cannot Refuse…expressed in what is called ostracism, nevertheless is very powerful, and is reinforced by the necessities of Commerce…don’t insult the useful untermenschen because it harms profits.

    Tucker Carlson last night on Fox had a rep from the European Parliament defending its new rule for banning racial, etc. speech. Carlson, ever the impish bone-smasher, called the whole thing totalitarian, and laughed his little boy laugh. Emperor’s Clothes kid.

    In another interview last night of a survivor/hostage in Syria I think, kidnapped by jihadists, frankly stated that only in Assad’s Syria was it safe and relatively normal for civilians. Carlson said, something like Wow, that counters the official story about Assad, etc. Carlson better Watch It! or he will be looking for another job.

    How those Fox News guys and gals, pretty smart all of them, can put up with the zionist fatwas…of Fox….

    Also, on MSNBC last night Chris Mathew wondered if Trump had been set-up by the Ruskies with a prostitute/agent and are now blackmailing him. Plus more weirdness…you gotta view these guys to get a real good sense of how nutty they are.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  40. Mark Green says: • Website

    This was a fairly good article, though it breaks no new ground and leaves out a lot. And as usual, Weissberg avoids the Jewish question as he zeros in on the incompatibility of Islam and Christianity. But that friction just part of the story. Indeed, America and the West didn’t even have a Muslim problem until Israel became America’s foremost sacred cow.

    As for the Alt-Right, Jewish activism is a central challenge to its political mission, which is to regain white independence and freedom of association for white Americans.

    Jewish/Zionist interests however are at odds with many of the aspirations held by those in the Alt-Right movement since race and religion are involved. So let’s be candid. Soft Jewish tyranny in America has had an immensely destructive impact on white America–yet Weissberg and countless other (mostly Jewish) intellectuals ignore this fact.

    Weissberg cites imported ‘Syrian goat-herders’ as a threat to white Christian American culture, but not, apparently, Jewish ACLU lawyers or Jewish Zionist activists and donors. His narrow view is highly deceptive.

    Indeed, over the past six decades, organized Jewish activists (sometimes operating under the banner of atheism or Constitutional fundamentalism) have banished Christianity from the public square as well as the American classroom. Yet Zionism and Holocaust indoctrination get a pass. Why does Weissberg invariably ignore this transformation?–not to mention numerous double-standards that benefit Jewry at a cost to others?

    We don’t know since Weissberg does not examine it forthrightly.

    Further, the theological divide between Judaism and Christianity is probably deeper that that which separates Islam from either faith. After all, Islam considers Christ a prophet. Judaism sees him as an enemy and a fraud. But Weissberg would pretend that America’s ‘Judeo-Christian heritage’ is genuine. Many in the Alt-right see through this deception. Not Weissberg.

    As for the demographic transitions now underway in the West, why are North African and Middle East Muslims flooding Europe and America in the first place?

    This unprecedented explosion of refugees is due to pan-Zionist militarism which has helped destroy Iraq, Palestine, Libya and Syria. Terrorism and the refugee crisis is a byproduct of Zio-American wars. Yet Weissberg habitually ignores this fact.

    In a similar vein, Jewish donors to both of America’s two major parties have kept illegal immigration off the political table for decades. They want the West’s borders largely OPEN. Trump changed this. Many powerful Jews however want white rule in the West diminished if not eliminated. Israel however is allowed to subjugate and expel its indigenous non-Jews.

    Weissberg implicitly pretends that political friction between whites and Jews does not and should not exist in America. But that can’t be true. Countless Jews are helping to orchestrate America’s unwanted demographic transformation as well as Washington’s serial warfare in the Middle East and beyond.

    This power imbalance explains why Hollywood, our glorious ‘liberal’ news media, and our government schools bombard white America with Israeli-Jewish-Auschwitz-KKK-slavery-white supremacism drek each and every day. So take your Jewish medicine children. Just turn on your TV for all the necessary news, information and entertainment. After that, you can visit your local Holocaust museum.

    This kosher propaganda matrix exists by design. Hasn’t Weissberg noticed?

    This ubiquitous mix of disinformation, propaganda and hasbara keeps Jews and their progeny aware and cohesive while our children and community are guilt-ridden and divided. Many in the Alt-right understands this. I bet Weissberg secretly does, too.

    Indeed, there are so many double-standards and special privileges that Jews now enjoy in America that it’s impossible not to notice. Israeli-Americans have carved out a privileged niche for themselves. But saying so is ‘anti-Semitic’. Yet Weissberg pretends not to notice. He’s got his Jewish blinders on.

    Indeed, due to inordinate Jewish influence, average Americans rarely get to see programs, films or academic lessons that examine organized Jewish malfeasance–from international crime, to heavy-handed Zionist lobbying, to the spread of harmful ideologies such as communism; not to mention serial, ongoing, pro-Zionist wars in the Middle East.

    These multiple, Mideast wars/interventions may now seem ‘normal’, but they are part of a vast, serial, criminal enterprise. Just count the bodies.

    These is a complex and explosive subject. But the examination of this phenomena remains under very tight supervision. Organized censorship is a key tool here. As is media control And what group, Mr. Weissberg, most ably manages this censorship and control?

    America has a Jewish problem. This quandary covers a lot of ground. It involves not only speech restrictions and taboos involving race and religion, but the strategic abuse of political power involving intervention and war. Jews have brilliantly steered America into a uniform, pro-Zionist direction.

    And since Jews are Caucasian, they demand, expect and now receive full access to white-majority groups, events, assemblies, corporations, colleges and what-have-you. But if you are white and you try to exclude Jews (or advance specifically non-Jewish interests such as neutrality in the Middle East) then you’ve got a fight on your hands. This is where the taboo of ‘anti-Semitism’ is played out in our Zionist-friendly media. It’s a another artful and brilliant accomplishment by Israeli-Americans. On this topic, Weissberg is also silent.

    Meanwhile, Jews demand the right to create and/or sustain all-Jewish groups, lobbies, federations, union and associations. And many of these exclusive, coordinated, all-Jewish organizations hold immense political power. They unashamedly advocate for Jewish causes and interests. Yet we’re not supposed to notice any conflict of group interests involving Jews and whites in America. Israel and America: in love forever.

    These distortions and fantasies have disarmed whites and empowered Jews. This is why the Alt-right movement is under constant pressure by the (Jewish-dominated) Left. White interests are ultimately at odds with Jewish supremacy.

    The Alt-Right therefore threatens Jewish power in America. It’s inevitable. Weissberg surely understands this. But he’s trying to manage it via omission. This is a familiar trick.

    And just who are the dominant agents in the conspiracy to criminalize political speech, Mr. Weissberg? (And yes, it is a conspiracy.)

    You know. We know.

    Ultimately, the Alt-Right wants the right to advocate for white interests–free of Jewish oversight. This is not unreasonable. But this distinction of group interests undermines Jewish influence as well as Israel’s artificial centrality in American life. That’s the rub. This is why there’s so much chatter about Trump’s alleged ‘anti-Semitism’ and his ties to ‘white supremacism’. This entire campaign is another Jewish canard. They are endless.

    Simply speaking, there are enormous problems associated with unchecked Jewish power in American life. Ignoring them will not solve the problem or make it go away. Too bad Weissberg is ultimately carrying water for the Zionist establishment. This deception deserves to be unmasked.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter
    The Jew does splendid (though not perfect) job of explaining the Alt Right and closes with typical Jewish intellectual snarkiness.
    , @Jack ryan
    He writes:

    "Indeed, America and the West didn’t even have a Muslim problem until Israel became America’s foremost sacred cow."

    I respond :

    Oh what a filthy liar you are!

    Read up on the sack of Constantinople, Ottoman Muslim Turk practices of grabbing White concubine slaves and grabbing White boys from the Balkans as Jannisary slave warriors .

    In our time Left Labour Party areas of Luton and Rotherham are PC anti Israel - the Muslims do child sexual grooming anyway.

    Pis$ of you pathetic coward and liar.

    Don t date show your arse at an Amren conference.
    , @Seamus Padraig
    Could not agree more.
    , @anarchyst
    You bring out a good point. Actually, Judaism and Islam are more alike than most realize.
    Both the Judaic Talmud and Islamic Qur'an espouse virtually the same hostility against outsiders, proscribing much greater punishments for those who transgress against each respective "tribe", while proscribing little or no punishment for those of their respective "tribes" who transgress against "non-believers".
    Having read both the Judaic Talmud and the Islamic Qur'an, there are virtually identical passages that espouse the above.
    One could argue that Islam is an Arabicized form of Judaism.
    BOTH Judaism and Islam promote their own (virtually identical) forms of supremacism.
    There is one divergence of note:
    Judaism regards Jesus Christ as an apostate, boiling in excrement for eternity while his mother Mary is considered a harlot who consorted with a Roman soldier.
    Islam regards Jesus Christ as a great prophet--not the "Son of God", but a great prophet, nevertheless. Christ's mother Mary is given a high place of honor and is specifically mentioned in the Qur'an.
    Now which "belief system" harbors a greater hostility towards Christianity??
    , @anarchyst
    A major problem is the concept of "dual citizenship".
    The United States government and other influential organizations are infested (infected?) with these "dual nationality" types.
    In fact, there are many thousands of government officials and their offspring who have served in the IDF, (Israeli Defense Forces) which should be contrary to the citizenship laws of the United States and should result in prosecution and loss of American citizenship. This behavior, in itself should be raising many "red flags" as to who really runs this country.
    "Dual nationality" and "dual citizenship" must be abolished.
    Any one holding "dual citizenship should be prohibited from having any influence or working in any capacity for any United States government agency...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. @Jason Liu
    The alt-right does not really seek favors from Zionists, support for Zionism is the same as their support for nationalistic policies in Japan or the Philippines.

    Part of it is ideological allegiance, the other is that these states are assets and territories for nationalism in the fight against global leftism. The more nationalist states, the stronger the ideology, the further it spreads. There is tribalism based on race/ethnicity, and there is tribalism based on ideology. The world needs both.

    Zionism wouldn’t be so bad if:

    1. They did it on their own dime
    2. They didn’t exercise an inordinate amount of influence on US policy

    Read More
    • Replies: @Karl
    41 Duncan Idaho > 1. They did it on their own dime 2. They didn’t exercise an inordinate amount of influence on US policy


    your bullet #1 is a valid concern, and buy the way is sometimes discussed here in terms of OUR OWN independence.


    your bullet #2 is nonsense. Whatever political vacuum we fill in Washington, is not a vacuum created by us. We do manipulate it for our own benefit, but it was there to start with. We didn't create a White Race that pays more attention to HighSchool Football Championships than to the amount of bullion backing the paper currency.

    By the way - Germany & France have state-sponsored culture-dissemination programs throughout the world. Does it bother you?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. The Alt-Right is simply a signpost.

    What upsets the Mainstream (Leftists across the spectrum, but all leftists) is that their signpost no longer enjoys the widespread, albeit half-hearted support it did during the last 40, 60, 100 or more years.

    We’re witnessing a once-in-centuries shift in the basic premises, the animating belief system, of an entire civilization. Leftism’s sacraments no longer have the hearts of growing numbers of people. I believe this has to do with very deep, pre-cognitive herding behavior described under Robert Prechter’s Socionomic Hypothesis, but regardless of attribution, people are breaking free of Leftism’s increasing estrangement from reality.

    There is no longer enough glue left to make people believe a man can be a woman or that race is nothing but a social construct. The harder the Mainstream (Leftist Theocracy, really) tries to shame, humiliate and pummel people back into line, the more those people resist, and they go looking for like-minded people.

    They find them in the Alt-Right.

    There, they find a treasure trove of information about economics, culture, crime, race, creed, etc., that was interdicted under the Leftist Theocracy. They learn WHY we in the West are wealthy, why our crime rates are (were) low, why Mayberry RFD was Whitopia, why inner-city schools are like 3rd world war zones, why there are persistent differences between people whose ancestors spent most of the last 1000 years under very different selective environments.

    This is why the Theocracy fears the Alt-Right. The Theocracy is battling an idea whose time has come, and is (as Victor Hugo described) predictably losing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  43. Recapitulating Archie Bunker.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rue
    (((Norman Lear))) --- the echo that reverberates with the tones of white genocide.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. @Inque Yutani
    Better better yet, lets make a list of things NOT created by dogs.

    Oh, look at that, same as your list.

    You're free to go live in a hut made out of shit and cholera with the rest of the noble peoples who don't perpetrate such evils upon the world.. No one is stopping you. No one will miss you.

    Not the same list.

    Dogs did not invent genital mutilation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Inque Yutani
    Well they do lick themselves.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. jack ryan says:

    Politics certainly makes for strange bedfellows. The American Lib Left Democrat elites are now losing their collective minds hating on all things Trump and hating Trump supporters (poor and working class White Americans, White Southerners, The Russians, Alt Right activists who don’t hate their own people and who correctly want peace with Russia and all remaining still majority White European nations and who also opposed the Neo Conservative intrigues and counter productive wars in the Middle East)

    So it’s a weird reality that the very Jewish dominated Liberal Left media, or just the MSM – Mainstream Media – hates Trump and thus takes the side of Muslim migrants, tries to deny Muslim atrocities in Europe or just the 1 million plus Muslim male migrants that invaded Western Europe in 2016.

    It’s a weird reality that American Lib Left Jews and also yeah Neo Conservatives Jews like William Kristol, David Frum, Elliot Abrams etc are on the same side of 1 billion plus world Muslims in everything that counts except Israel vs the Palestinians.

    Why? -The Muslims and Jews both hate or fear White Europeans, White European Americans – a lot of this is envy (Jewish women who are piss*** that Billy Joels of the world prefer Nordic Gentile blonde GFs, wives than Jewess wives. Few men of anything ethnic, cultural, religious backgrounds want to date or marry the likes of Elena Kagan or Ruth Bader Ginzberg. How many Jewish husbands did Christie Brinkley have?

    This weird Jewish Muslim alliance against Whites isn’t anything new. Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492 or put under the Inquisition in large part for taking the Muslim side against Spanish Catholics Whites, for being Muslim tax collectors, for trafficking White girls to Muslim buyers.

    Here’s the best history lesson of Whites (Catholics) Muslim Moors and the Jews in between in 15th Century Spain.

    This sh*** is happening now here in North America plus we had all kinds of weird other players like Social Justice Warriors pretending to be Black or Native American Indian (Sen. Elizabeth Warren)

    Spain 15th Century – Why the Jews were expelled Occidental Dissent

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2015/10/12/15th-century-spain-muslims-jews-and-our-guys/

    Yes, politics makes for strange bedfellows. The MSM, Neo Cons, Lib Left is spreading the meme that Trump and the Trump admin is in “Bed With the Russians”!

    I would love to be in bed with beautiful Russians like Miss Anna Kournikova and Maria Sharapova. Yeah I hear the rumors that both these Russian gals work for the KGB. If they interrogated me…

    I’d talk.
    :-)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "Billy Joels of the world prefer Nordic Gentile blonde GFs, wives than Jewess wives. Few men of anything ethnic, cultural, religious backgrounds want to date or marry the likes of Elena Kagan or Ruth Bader Ginzberg. How many Jewish husbands did Christie Brinkley have?"

    There is certainly the Portnoy Complex, but most white women, even Nordic women, do NOT look like fashion models.

    Also, the kind of Jewesses that make it in intellectual sphere tend to be geekettes, but this is true of every group. Most brainy women of all races look rather plain or homely..

    White, Asian, Hispanic, Jewish, etc babes generally don't become successful in brainy fields.
    Remember Janet Reno?
    , @pogohere
    Re: "Spain 15th Century – Why the Jews were expelled Occidental Dissent"

    Reads a bit like this one:

    STALIN’S WILLING EXECUTIONERS

    JEWS AS A HOSTILE ELITE IN THE USSR

    The Jewish Century

    Yuri Slezkine

    Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004 $29.95 (cloth) x + 438 pages

    Reviewed by Kevin MacDonald

    A persistent theme among critics of Jews—particularly those on the pre-World War II right—has been that the Bolshevik revolution was a Jewish revolution and that the Soviet Union was dominated by Jews. This theme appears in a wide range of writings, from Henry Ford’s International Jew, to published statements by a long list of British, French, and American political figures in the 1920s (Winston Churchill, Woodrow Wilson, and David Lloyd George), and, in its most extreme form, by Adolf Hitler, who wrote:

    "Now begins the last great revolution. By wresting political power for himself, the Jew casts off the few remaining shreds of disguise he still wears. The democratic plebeian Jew turns into the blood Jew and the tyrant of peoples. In a few years he will try to exterminate the national pillars of intelligence and, by robbing the peoples of their natural spiritual leadership, will make them ripe for the slavish lot of a permanent subjugation. The most terrible example of this is Russia."

    This long tradition stands in sharp contradiction to the official view, promulgated by Jewish organizations and almost all contemporary historians, that Jews played no special role in Bolshevism and indeed were specifically victimized by it. Yuri Slezkine’s book provides a much needed resolution to these opposing perspectives. It is an intellectual tour de force, alternately muddled and brilliant, courageous and apologetic.

    http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/slezkinerev.pdf
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @ThereisaGod
    The globalist oligarchy opposes and (successfully) forbids whites collectively defending their interests. How can one explain this?
    The most obvious one is that Jews (VERY committed to their own ethnic interests) have taken over leadership of the western world from whites and are determined to eliminate their major competitor for once and for all ... via these kind of cultural mind wars. Oh, and by engineered mass immigration of Africans and Arabs into all (of what were once understood to be) white societies.

    Anyone got a better explanation?

    The only other possible explanation, as I see it, is that the invisible "oligarchy" driving global events are not primarily Jewish [they are certainly not ENTIRELY Jewish] but rather (for want of a better word) Satanists who, by definition, are entirely devoted to self-interest and who consider ordinary folk to be, at best, slaves and, at worst, an enemy to be systematically enslaved or destroyed. These Satanists, being very cunning, USE 'The Jewish People'. They hide behind their amplified victimhood and use Jews, whenever possible, to front their criminal projects (in business, banking and government) in the public domain. So that if we turn on our masters we will attack only Jews and the entirely innocent ones (NEARLY ALL Jews who are merely brainwashed muppets like ourselves)

    Either way, the issue of who are are our warmongering diabolical rulers cannot be addressed without addressing this Jewish question. If Jews genuinely turn against their own leadership as Christ commanded them ... we will all be saved. Without this collective Jewish change of heart it is hard to see anything but disaster on the horizon. One way or another.

    Jews need to ask themselves.
    This 'Equality', 'Liberal', 'anti-Racist' agenda to which we are all committed ... are we committed because we LOVE ALL THE HUMAN RACE and will defend and protect universal rights? Or are we committed because we want to live in a society dominated by the globalist international bankers driving this Imperialist agenda.
    Do we REALLY love our neighbours or do we love the tyranny this hijacking of human moral conscience is actually manufacturing.
    Because it is "OUR" tyranny?
    The intention at the bottom (in Communist societies) can be sincere (if stupid). The intention at the top is always TOTALLY INSINCERE. The people at the top do not care about "equality" AT ALL!
    AT ALL!
    And sincerity (regarding spirituality and, please reflect on it, our eternal destiny) is everything.

    “The globalist oligarchy opposes and (successfully) forbids whites collectively defending their interests. How can one explain this?
    The most obvious one is that Jews (VERY committed to their own ethnic interests) have taken over leadership of the western world from whites and are determined to eliminate their major competitor for once and for all … via these kind of cultural mind wars. Oh, and by engineered mass immigration of Africans and Arabs into all (of what were once understood to be) white societies.

    Anyone got a better explanation?”

    Yes. Political correctness and all that it implies and promotes was not invented by jews. PC is the current mode of the spirit of the times, its antecedents being the universal belief in value-free relativism that is taught everywhere to everyone. The commenter I am replying to is seeing conspiracy where there is no conspiracy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @PV van der Byl
    Agree. Just consider Scandinavia.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. @War for Blair Mountain
    If the Alt Right is threatening...it should be threatening and scary to the repellant, ugly, butch looking, old farting bulldyke and biological abnormality Rosie O'Donnell, because the Alt Right stands with Christian Russia!!!....no fucking apologies!!! God Bless Vladimir Putin and the Conservative Christian Russian People!!!

    You seemed to be obsessed with lesbians who may have gastrointestinal distress. Where does communism fit?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thales the Milesian
    "Where does communism fit?"

    In the Heart of the Aces!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. BenKenobi says:
    @Seamus Padraig

    Ironically given the accusations of Alt-Right anti-Semitism, Israel with its total commitment to its Jewish identity is often heralded as the model for such a state.
     
    This is the single biggest reservation I have about the Alt-Right: their seaming love affair with Zionism. Just because we American nationalists aspire to the same thing as the Zionists--sovereign control over our territory--does not automatically mean that we are 'on the same side', as some Alt-Righters seem to think. Whether Israel exists or not has almost no bearing on our existence and sovereignty. Israel, for me, is just another foreign country ... and being a none-too-religious white Goy, I identify far, far more with the countries of Europe than with any Middle Eastern country.

    Moreover, some Alt-Righters seem to think they have a clever plot to turn the Zionists against the cultural-Marxist Jews. But in the end, who'll be duping whom? In concrete terms, what are the Zionists going to do to help us white Goyim take back America from the cultmarx Jews? After all, don't the Zionists themselves control our congress, along with a healthy chunk of finance and media? What interest would they conceivably have in giving that up? Remember what happened to the Christians a generation ago: 'Oh, if only we try being nice to the Jews and praising Israel, then their media will be nice to us for a change and give us some help.' So how did that turn out? From where I sit, the whole Moral Majority thing looks to have been an epic failure. Not only are they nowhere near restoring prayer in school, but now we have full-on homosexual marriage and even tranny bathrooms!

    I understand why some Alt-Righters would think of cultmarx Jews as a bigger danger than Zionists: it's because the former cause most of their trouble at home, while the latter cause most of it overseas. But foreign policy ultimately affects us, too. And please remember that both factions of Jews control certain--and extensive--aspects of the domestic establishment in order to further their goals.


    It explicitly rejects the honored “self-evident” principle that America is a propositional nation where everyone—whether from Sudan or Sweden—can become a 100% “real red blooded American” by embracing our principles and values.
     
    I used to believe in that propositional-national stuff when I was a kid, too. But over the course of my life, I noticed that they just kept changing the propositions at their convenience (not ours!), and so I grew cynical and rejected the whole concept.

    Think Marine Le Pen and the National Front in France or, in Germany, Frauke Petry and the Alternative for Germany, two nationalist, anti-immigration parties that arrived out “of nowhere” and are now serious electoral players.
     
    That's true of AfD, which was only founded in 2011, but it's definitely not true of Front national, which was founded in 1972 and has been a force in French politics for about twenty years now.

    (Incidentally, I really hope Le Pen wins. If Europe has any hope at all, it's France. And if France has any hope at all, it's the FN.)

    Don’t think of Alt-Right praise of Israel and Zionism as trying to “cozy” up to the Tribe, or trying to “get them to go easy on us.”

    It’s a form of political judo. Philosemitic Nazis? That sound you hear is heads exploding.

    We just want to be more like the Jews, and follow their shining example.

    If anything, it’s meant to turn up the heat on the Chosen. Take the BDS movement, for example. Those people already consider Israel to essentially be an apartheid White nation oppressing their brown population. We want to crank stuff like that up to eleven. An endorsement of Israel by the Alt-Right is meant to link the two brands in the minds of the diverse horde.

    The intersectionality of the oppressed has produced some very bizarre political alliances. Take radical feminists and radical Islam, for example. What we need is some intersectionality of the oppressors to produce an unlikely political alliance of our own.

    Read More
    • Agree: PV van der Byl
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Exactly.

    Using Jews as an example of your political thinking instantly crushes all opposition. "Are Jews a bunch of Nazis for wanting their own nation state?" "Are American Jews a bunch of Nazis for wanting to preserve their people and culture within our society?"

    If someone asks, I simply tell them that I want for whites what Jews want for their people.

    White liberals and cuckservatives will literally sputter with cognitive dissonance. They have no reply because there is no reply. Jews are good. White nationalists are evil. But they are the same. Cannot compute.

    Something similar happens if you tell a liberal or cuckservative that you want to live around whites not because you hate other groups but because you love your own people. You wish other peoples well; you just don't want to live around them. Liberals and cuckservatives have never considered that possibility.
    , @Lot

    An endorsement of Israel by the Alt-Right is meant to link the two brands in the minds of the diverse horde.
     
    Two things wrong with this. First, the actual anti-sem right just doesn't do this. They either don't take sides or are actively pro-Arab.

    Second, there is no need to link Israel and "racist" white conservative parties "in the minds of the diverse horde" because that link is already there and completely solid.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. @Anonymouse
    "The globalist oligarchy opposes and (successfully) forbids whites collectively defending their interests. How can one explain this?
    The most obvious one is that Jews (VERY committed to their own ethnic interests) have taken over leadership of the western world from whites and are determined to eliminate their major competitor for once and for all … via these kind of cultural mind wars. Oh, and by engineered mass immigration of Africans and Arabs into all (of what were once understood to be) white societies.

    Anyone got a better explanation?"

    Yes. Political correctness and all that it implies and promotes was not invented by jews. PC is the current mode of the spirit of the times, its antecedents being the universal belief in value-free relativism that is taught everywhere to everyone. The commenter I am replying to is seeing conspiracy where there is no conspiracy.

    Agree. Just consider Scandinavia.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    And the vast majority of Swedish media that pushes this rampant strain of PC is owned by Jews. The Swedes didn't push it on themselves.

    Jews are where the conversation about the West's downfall begins and ends. If anyone tries to tell you otherwise they a) aren't informed, or b) are running cover.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. @Mark Green
    This was a fairly good article, though it breaks no new ground and leaves out a lot. And as usual, Weissberg avoids the Jewish question as he zeros in on the incompatibility of Islam and Christianity. But that friction just part of the story. Indeed, America and the West didn't even have a Muslim problem until Israel became America's foremost sacred cow.

    As for the Alt-Right, Jewish activism is a central challenge to its political mission, which is to regain white independence and freedom of association for white Americans.

    Jewish/Zionist interests however are at odds with many of the aspirations held by those in the Alt-Right movement since race and religion are involved. So let's be candid. Soft Jewish tyranny in America has had an immensely destructive impact on white America--yet Weissberg and countless other (mostly Jewish) intellectuals ignore this fact.

    Weissberg cites imported 'Syrian goat-herders' as a threat to white Christian American culture, but not, apparently, Jewish ACLU lawyers or Jewish Zionist activists and donors. His narrow view is highly deceptive.

    Indeed, over the past six decades, organized Jewish activists (sometimes operating under the banner of atheism or Constitutional fundamentalism) have banished Christianity from the public square as well as the American classroom. Yet Zionism and Holocaust indoctrination get a pass. Why does Weissberg invariably ignore this transformation?--not to mention numerous double-standards that benefit Jewry at a cost to others?

    We don't know since Weissberg does not examine it forthrightly.

    Further, the theological divide between Judaism and Christianity is probably deeper that that which separates Islam from either faith. After all, Islam considers Christ a prophet. Judaism sees him as an enemy and a fraud. But Weissberg would pretend that America's 'Judeo-Christian heritage' is genuine. Many in the Alt-right see through this deception. Not Weissberg.

    As for the demographic transitions now underway in the West, why are North African and Middle East Muslims flooding Europe and America in the first place?

    This unprecedented explosion of refugees is due to pan-Zionist militarism which has helped destroy Iraq, Palestine, Libya and Syria. Terrorism and the refugee crisis is a byproduct of Zio-American wars. Yet Weissberg habitually ignores this fact.

    In a similar vein, Jewish donors to both of America's two major parties have kept illegal immigration off the political table for decades. They want the West's borders largely OPEN. Trump changed this. Many powerful Jews however want white rule in the West diminished if not eliminated. Israel however is allowed to subjugate and expel its indigenous non-Jews.

    Weissberg implicitly pretends that political friction between whites and Jews does not and should not exist in America. But that can't be true. Countless Jews are helping to orchestrate America's unwanted demographic transformation as well as Washington's serial warfare in the Middle East and beyond.

    This power imbalance explains why Hollywood, our glorious 'liberal' news media, and our government schools bombard white America with Israeli-Jewish-Auschwitz-KKK-slavery-white supremacism drek each and every day. So take your Jewish medicine children. Just turn on your TV for all the necessary news, information and entertainment. After that, you can visit your local Holocaust museum.

    This kosher propaganda matrix exists by design. Hasn't Weissberg noticed?

    This ubiquitous mix of disinformation, propaganda and hasbara keeps Jews and their progeny aware and cohesive while our children and community are guilt-ridden and divided. Many in the Alt-right understands this. I bet Weissberg secretly does, too.

    Indeed, there are so many double-standards and special privileges that Jews now enjoy in America that it's impossible not to notice. Israeli-Americans have carved out a privileged niche for themselves. But saying so is 'anti-Semitic'. Yet Weissberg pretends not to notice. He's got his Jewish blinders on.

    Indeed, due to inordinate Jewish influence, average Americans rarely get to see programs, films or academic lessons that examine organized Jewish malfeasance--from international crime, to heavy-handed Zionist lobbying, to the spread of harmful ideologies such as communism; not to mention serial, ongoing, pro-Zionist wars in the Middle East.

    These multiple, Mideast wars/interventions may now seem 'normal', but they are part of a vast, serial, criminal enterprise. Just count the bodies.

    These is a complex and explosive subject. But the examination of this phenomena remains under very tight supervision. Organized censorship is a key tool here. As is media control And what group, Mr. Weissberg, most ably manages this censorship and control?

    America has a Jewish problem. This quandary covers a lot of ground. It involves not only speech restrictions and taboos involving race and religion, but the strategic abuse of political power involving intervention and war. Jews have brilliantly steered America into a uniform, pro-Zionist direction.

    And since Jews are Caucasian, they demand, expect and now receive full access to white-majority groups, events, assemblies, corporations, colleges and what-have-you. But if you are white and you try to exclude Jews (or advance specifically non-Jewish interests such as neutrality in the Middle East) then you've got a fight on your hands. This is where the taboo of 'anti-Semitism' is played out in our Zionist-friendly media. It's a another artful and brilliant accomplishment by Israeli-Americans. On this topic, Weissberg is also silent.

    Meanwhile, Jews demand the right to create and/or sustain all-Jewish groups, lobbies, federations, union and associations. And many of these exclusive, coordinated, all-Jewish organizations hold immense political power. They unashamedly advocate for Jewish causes and interests. Yet we're not supposed to notice any conflict of group interests involving Jews and whites in America. Israel and America: in love forever.

    These distortions and fantasies have disarmed whites and empowered Jews. This is why the Alt-right movement is under constant pressure by the (Jewish-dominated) Left. White interests are ultimately at odds with Jewish supremacy.

    The Alt-Right therefore threatens Jewish power in America. It's inevitable. Weissberg surely understands this. But he's trying to manage it via omission. This is a familiar trick.

    And just who are the dominant agents in the conspiracy to criminalize political speech, Mr. Weissberg? (And yes, it is a conspiracy.)

    You know. We know.

    Ultimately, the Alt-Right wants the right to advocate for white interests--free of Jewish oversight. This is not unreasonable. But this distinction of group interests undermines Jewish influence as well as Israel's artificial centrality in American life. That's the rub. This is why there's so much chatter about Trump's alleged 'anti-Semitism' and his ties to 'white supremacism'. This entire campaign is another Jewish canard. They are endless.

    Simply speaking, there are enormous problems associated with unchecked Jewish power in American life. Ignoring them will not solve the problem or make it go away. Too bad Weissberg is ultimately carrying water for the Zionist establishment. This deception deserves to be unmasked.

    The Jew does splendid (though not perfect) job of explaining the Alt Right and closes with typical Jewish intellectual snarkiness.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. @Renoman
    Let's make a list of things created by sub Saharan Africans. It's a very thin book. It's not racism, it's realism.

    Dance, music, sex, pretty important

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    I will still say that multiculturalism CAN work, IF it is done cautiously.

    Regardless of whether you are right or not, the real question is WHY would we want to make multiculturalism work? Why have multiculturalism at all?

    Why would a people bring another culture (another people) into their land and their lives? It can only lead to a weakening and/or dilution of your people and culture. It's a form of suicide.

    Are we talking about the same thing? The point of multiculturalist doctrine I take to be that no attempt should be made to push assimilation. I remember a minor Jewish public intellectual working at the time for a conservative government saying multiculture was transitional, not to be expected to survive generations in Australia as Australians. And obviously you can’t expect the first adult arrivals of a family of traditional Hindus or Coptic Christians or Muslims to assimilate. Then you have to start making all sorts of distinctions concerning numbers and tradeoffs. And it is hard to reject a tradeoff which encourages relatively high IQ immigration from diverse sources as Australia’s current immigration policy imperfectly does when your native population is breeding dysgenically as Austraia’s, though not as bad as Europe’s, evidently is (cf. James Thompson’s recent article – The Woodley Effect).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Jack ryan says: • Website
    @Mark Green
    This was a fairly good article, though it breaks no new ground and leaves out a lot. And as usual, Weissberg avoids the Jewish question as he zeros in on the incompatibility of Islam and Christianity. But that friction just part of the story. Indeed, America and the West didn't even have a Muslim problem until Israel became America's foremost sacred cow.

    As for the Alt-Right, Jewish activism is a central challenge to its political mission, which is to regain white independence and freedom of association for white Americans.

    Jewish/Zionist interests however are at odds with many of the aspirations held by those in the Alt-Right movement since race and religion are involved. So let's be candid. Soft Jewish tyranny in America has had an immensely destructive impact on white America--yet Weissberg and countless other (mostly Jewish) intellectuals ignore this fact.

    Weissberg cites imported 'Syrian goat-herders' as a threat to white Christian American culture, but not, apparently, Jewish ACLU lawyers or Jewish Zionist activists and donors. His narrow view is highly deceptive.

    Indeed, over the past six decades, organized Jewish activists (sometimes operating under the banner of atheism or Constitutional fundamentalism) have banished Christianity from the public square as well as the American classroom. Yet Zionism and Holocaust indoctrination get a pass. Why does Weissberg invariably ignore this transformation?--not to mention numerous double-standards that benefit Jewry at a cost to others?

    We don't know since Weissberg does not examine it forthrightly.

    Further, the theological divide between Judaism and Christianity is probably deeper that that which separates Islam from either faith. After all, Islam considers Christ a prophet. Judaism sees him as an enemy and a fraud. But Weissberg would pretend that America's 'Judeo-Christian heritage' is genuine. Many in the Alt-right see through this deception. Not Weissberg.

    As for the demographic transitions now underway in the West, why are North African and Middle East Muslims flooding Europe and America in the first place?

    This unprecedented explosion of refugees is due to pan-Zionist militarism which has helped destroy Iraq, Palestine, Libya and Syria. Terrorism and the refugee crisis is a byproduct of Zio-American wars. Yet Weissberg habitually ignores this fact.

    In a similar vein, Jewish donors to both of America's two major parties have kept illegal immigration off the political table for decades. They want the West's borders largely OPEN. Trump changed this. Many powerful Jews however want white rule in the West diminished if not eliminated. Israel however is allowed to subjugate and expel its indigenous non-Jews.

    Weissberg implicitly pretends that political friction between whites and Jews does not and should not exist in America. But that can't be true. Countless Jews are helping to orchestrate America's unwanted demographic transformation as well as Washington's serial warfare in the Middle East and beyond.

    This power imbalance explains why Hollywood, our glorious 'liberal' news media, and our government schools bombard white America with Israeli-Jewish-Auschwitz-KKK-slavery-white supremacism drek each and every day. So take your Jewish medicine children. Just turn on your TV for all the necessary news, information and entertainment. After that, you can visit your local Holocaust museum.

    This kosher propaganda matrix exists by design. Hasn't Weissberg noticed?

    This ubiquitous mix of disinformation, propaganda and hasbara keeps Jews and their progeny aware and cohesive while our children and community are guilt-ridden and divided. Many in the Alt-right understands this. I bet Weissberg secretly does, too.

    Indeed, there are so many double-standards and special privileges that Jews now enjoy in America that it's impossible not to notice. Israeli-Americans have carved out a privileged niche for themselves. But saying so is 'anti-Semitic'. Yet Weissberg pretends not to notice. He's got his Jewish blinders on.

    Indeed, due to inordinate Jewish influence, average Americans rarely get to see programs, films or academic lessons that examine organized Jewish malfeasance--from international crime, to heavy-handed Zionist lobbying, to the spread of harmful ideologies such as communism; not to mention serial, ongoing, pro-Zionist wars in the Middle East.

    These multiple, Mideast wars/interventions may now seem 'normal', but they are part of a vast, serial, criminal enterprise. Just count the bodies.

    These is a complex and explosive subject. But the examination of this phenomena remains under very tight supervision. Organized censorship is a key tool here. As is media control And what group, Mr. Weissberg, most ably manages this censorship and control?

    America has a Jewish problem. This quandary covers a lot of ground. It involves not only speech restrictions and taboos involving race and religion, but the strategic abuse of political power involving intervention and war. Jews have brilliantly steered America into a uniform, pro-Zionist direction.

    And since Jews are Caucasian, they demand, expect and now receive full access to white-majority groups, events, assemblies, corporations, colleges and what-have-you. But if you are white and you try to exclude Jews (or advance specifically non-Jewish interests such as neutrality in the Middle East) then you've got a fight on your hands. This is where the taboo of 'anti-Semitism' is played out in our Zionist-friendly media. It's a another artful and brilliant accomplishment by Israeli-Americans. On this topic, Weissberg is also silent.

    Meanwhile, Jews demand the right to create and/or sustain all-Jewish groups, lobbies, federations, union and associations. And many of these exclusive, coordinated, all-Jewish organizations hold immense political power. They unashamedly advocate for Jewish causes and interests. Yet we're not supposed to notice any conflict of group interests involving Jews and whites in America. Israel and America: in love forever.

    These distortions and fantasies have disarmed whites and empowered Jews. This is why the Alt-right movement is under constant pressure by the (Jewish-dominated) Left. White interests are ultimately at odds with Jewish supremacy.

    The Alt-Right therefore threatens Jewish power in America. It's inevitable. Weissberg surely understands this. But he's trying to manage it via omission. This is a familiar trick.

    And just who are the dominant agents in the conspiracy to criminalize political speech, Mr. Weissberg? (And yes, it is a conspiracy.)

    You know. We know.

    Ultimately, the Alt-Right wants the right to advocate for white interests--free of Jewish oversight. This is not unreasonable. But this distinction of group interests undermines Jewish influence as well as Israel's artificial centrality in American life. That's the rub. This is why there's so much chatter about Trump's alleged 'anti-Semitism' and his ties to 'white supremacism'. This entire campaign is another Jewish canard. They are endless.

    Simply speaking, there are enormous problems associated with unchecked Jewish power in American life. Ignoring them will not solve the problem or make it go away. Too bad Weissberg is ultimately carrying water for the Zionist establishment. This deception deserves to be unmasked.

    He writes:

    “Indeed, America and the West didn’t even have a Muslim problem until Israel became America’s foremost sacred cow.”

    I respond :

    Oh what a filthy liar you are!

    Read up on the sack of Constantinople, Ottoman Muslim Turk practices of grabbing White concubine slaves and grabbing White boys from the Balkans as Jannisary slave warriors .

    In our time Left Labour Party areas of Luton and Rotherham are PC anti Israel – the Muslims do child sexual grooming anyway.

    Pis$ of you pathetic coward and liar.

    Don t date show your arse at an Amren conference.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. @BenKenobi
    Don't think of Alt-Right praise of Israel and Zionism as trying to "cozy" up to the Tribe, or trying to "get them to go easy on us."

    It's a form of political judo. Philosemitic Nazis? That sound you hear is heads exploding.

    We just want to be more like the Jews, and follow their shining example.

    If anything, it's meant to turn up the heat on the Chosen. Take the BDS movement, for example. Those people already consider Israel to essentially be an apartheid White nation oppressing their brown population. We want to crank stuff like that up to eleven. An endorsement of Israel by the Alt-Right is meant to link the two brands in the minds of the diverse horde.

    The intersectionality of the oppressed has produced some very bizarre political alliances. Take radical feminists and radical Islam, for example. What we need is some intersectionality of the oppressors to produce an unlikely political alliance of our own.

    Exactly.

    Using Jews as an example of your political thinking instantly crushes all opposition. “Are Jews a bunch of Nazis for wanting their own nation state?” “Are American Jews a bunch of Nazis for wanting to preserve their people and culture within our society?”

    If someone asks, I simply tell them that I want for whites what Jews want for their people.

    White liberals and cuckservatives will literally sputter with cognitive dissonance. They have no reply because there is no reply. Jews are good. White nationalists are evil. But they are the same. Cannot compute.

    Something similar happens if you tell a liberal or cuckservative that you want to live around whites not because you hate other groups but because you love your own people. You wish other peoples well; you just don’t want to live around them. Liberals and cuckservatives have never considered that possibility.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. @War for Blair Mountain
    Citizen of a Silly Country

    The Chinese in China aren't engaging the Tibetans and Uigurs in deep psychometric discussions about the research of Rushton....Lynne....Plomin...and Linda Gottfriefson...

    Nor are the Hindus in India engaging the Pakistanis in deep psychometric discussions about Rushton....Lynne...and Linda Gottfriedson's research when the issue of Kashmir comes up...

    Its a long-standing Chinese tradition to respect the meritocracy of the examination system, to be honest. I will stand that we would probably be fine with any minority that does well in the gaokao – and indeed, minorities actually do get affirmative action to help them.

    I’ve nothing against ethnic nationalists, but I think its excessive to assume that China has the same attitude. While there may be some Han favorable concepts, the idea of the meritocracy has a long and storied tradition in Chinese history, myth and storytelling concept.

    One of the myths I grew up with was of a young boy during the dynastic era, who secretly listened to lessons and studied in spite of the incredible poverty of his parents, studying by candlelight at night. His dedication allows him to take the imperial examination, where he outpaces all of the rich bullies that once had harried him and in the end, is rewarded to become the governor over the province. The Confucian ideal of education and hard work is reinforced, though he goes a little blind for studying in the night.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ron Unz

    One of the myths I grew up with was of a young boy during the dynastic era, who secretly listened to lessons and studied in spite of the incredible poverty of his parents, studying by candlelight at night. His dedication allows him to take the imperial examination, where he outpaces all of the rich bullies that once had harried him and in the end, is rewarded to become the governor over the province.
     
    Yes, this is a very important aspect of Traditional China, which I discussed at length in one of my own articles a few years ago:

    For the Ming (1368–1644) and Ch’ing (1644–1911) dynasties, statistics exist on the social origins of the chin-shih class, the highest official rank, and these demonstrate a rate of upward mobility unmatched by almost any Western society, whether modern or premodern. Over 30 percent of such elite degree-holders came from commoner families that for three previous generations had produced no one of high official rank, and in the data from earlier centuries, this fraction of “new men” reached a high of 84 percent. Such numbers far exceed the equivalent figures for Cambridge University during all the centuries since its foundation, and would probably seem remarkable at America’s elite Ivy League colleges today or in the past. Meanwhile, downward social mobility was also common among even the highest families. As a summary statistic, across the six centuries of these two dynasties less than 6 percent of China’s ruling elites came from the ruling elites of the previous generation.[22]

    The founding philosophical principle of the modern Western world has been the “Equality of Man,” while that of Confucianist China was the polar opposite belief in the inherent inequality of men. Yet in reality, the latter often seemed to fulfill better the ideological goals of the former. Frontier America might have had its mythos of presidents born in log-cabins, but for many centuries a substantial fraction of the Middle Kingdom’s ruling mandarins did indeed come from rural rice-paddies, a state of affairs that would have seemed almost unimaginable in any European country until the Age of Revolution, and even long afterward.
     

    http://www.unz.com/runz/how-social-darwinism-made-modern-china-248/#remarkable-upward-mobility-but-relentless-downward-mobility
    , @Anon
    "Its a long-standing Chinese tradition to respect the meritocracy of the examination system, to be honest. I will stand that we would probably be fine with any minority that does well in the gaokao – and indeed, minorities actually do get affirmative action to help them."

    Meritocracy is all very well and good, but Chinese wasted the principle by selecting for talents that turned out to be useless. Yes, one can have a meritocratic system on who can write fancy calligraphy on an eight-legged essay, but what will such talent do for the nation?

    Suppose we select for elites in a nation purely on a meritocratic basis but the test involves chess and scrabble. Okay, it will select the smarter people to be sure, but in the service of what? Useless knowledge.

    So, meritocracy isn't enough. It is relevancy of what is tested for merit. Otherwise, it turns into meretriciocracy.

    In hard sciences, meritocracy works fine in the West. But when it comes to social sciences, we have so much uselessness because PC forbids honest discussion. So, even as social sciences do select for ability and intelligence, the talent is really for the ability to lie, spin, and obfuscate than to explore and investigate honestly.

    , @Oldvannes
    China has 1.2 billion people and fewer than 1500 naturalized non Chinese citizens.

    Non Han indigenous groups are not outsiders.

    The reason the Chinese, Koreans, Japanese etc have no overtly nationalist parties is because they have no large outside non indigenous groups to deal with. Nor, after watching the West implode, will they ever put their societies in such a position.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. Truth says:

    Your Boy Milo’s a little threatening if you are a 12 year-old boy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  57. Lot says:
    @BenKenobi
    Don't think of Alt-Right praise of Israel and Zionism as trying to "cozy" up to the Tribe, or trying to "get them to go easy on us."

    It's a form of political judo. Philosemitic Nazis? That sound you hear is heads exploding.

    We just want to be more like the Jews, and follow their shining example.

    If anything, it's meant to turn up the heat on the Chosen. Take the BDS movement, for example. Those people already consider Israel to essentially be an apartheid White nation oppressing their brown population. We want to crank stuff like that up to eleven. An endorsement of Israel by the Alt-Right is meant to link the two brands in the minds of the diverse horde.

    The intersectionality of the oppressed has produced some very bizarre political alliances. Take radical feminists and radical Islam, for example. What we need is some intersectionality of the oppressors to produce an unlikely political alliance of our own.

    An endorsement of Israel by the Alt-Right is meant to link the two brands in the minds of the diverse horde.

    Two things wrong with this. First, the actual anti-sem right just doesn’t do this. They either don’t take sides or are actively pro-Arab.

    Second, there is no need to link Israel and “racist” white conservative parties “in the minds of the diverse horde” because that link is already there and completely solid.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. Ron Unz says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    Its a long-standing Chinese tradition to respect the meritocracy of the examination system, to be honest. I will stand that we would probably be fine with any minority that does well in the gaokao - and indeed, minorities actually do get affirmative action to help them.

    I've nothing against ethnic nationalists, but I think its excessive to assume that China has the same attitude. While there may be some Han favorable concepts, the idea of the meritocracy has a long and storied tradition in Chinese history, myth and storytelling concept.

    One of the myths I grew up with was of a young boy during the dynastic era, who secretly listened to lessons and studied in spite of the incredible poverty of his parents, studying by candlelight at night. His dedication allows him to take the imperial examination, where he outpaces all of the rich bullies that once had harried him and in the end, is rewarded to become the governor over the province. The Confucian ideal of education and hard work is reinforced, though he goes a little blind for studying in the night.

    One of the myths I grew up with was of a young boy during the dynastic era, who secretly listened to lessons and studied in spite of the incredible poverty of his parents, studying by candlelight at night. His dedication allows him to take the imperial examination, where he outpaces all of the rich bullies that once had harried him and in the end, is rewarded to become the governor over the province.

    Yes, this is a very important aspect of Traditional China, which I discussed at length in one of my own articles a few years ago:

    For the Ming (1368–1644) and Ch’ing (1644–1911) dynasties, statistics exist on the social origins of the chin-shih class, the highest official rank, and these demonstrate a rate of upward mobility unmatched by almost any Western society, whether modern or premodern. Over 30 percent of such elite degree-holders came from commoner families that for three previous generations had produced no one of high official rank, and in the data from earlier centuries, this fraction of “new men” reached a high of 84 percent. Such numbers far exceed the equivalent figures for Cambridge University during all the centuries since its foundation, and would probably seem remarkable at America’s elite Ivy League colleges today or in the past. Meanwhile, downward social mobility was also common among even the highest families. As a summary statistic, across the six centuries of these two dynasties less than 6 percent of China’s ruling elites came from the ruling elites of the previous generation.[22]

    The founding philosophical principle of the modern Western world has been the “Equality of Man,” while that of Confucianist China was the polar opposite belief in the inherent inequality of men. Yet in reality, the latter often seemed to fulfill better the ideological goals of the former. Frontier America might have had its mythos of presidents born in log-cabins, but for many centuries a substantial fraction of the Middle Kingdom’s ruling mandarins did indeed come from rural rice-paddies, a state of affairs that would have seemed almost unimaginable in any European country until the Age of Revolution, and even long afterward.

    http://www.unz.com/runz/how-social-darwinism-made-modern-china-248/#remarkable-upward-mobility-but-relentless-downward-mobility

    Read More
    • Agree: Daniel Chieh
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    “Into this Omerta comes the Alt-Right willing to speak the unspeakable”

    Bingo, that’s it.

    If Alt Right was ONLY about holding certain positions, it will only appeal to those who agree.

    But because Alt-Right-Sphere is one of the few areas where people can speak honestly in the West, it provokes thoughts even those who detest Alt-Right positions.

    Even if one disagrees with Alt Right positions, its spirit of free discussion on taboo subjects makes them relevant to what is REALLY happening.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  60. Art says:
    @Seamus Padraig

    Ironically given the accusations of Alt-Right anti-Semitism, Israel with its total commitment to its Jewish identity is often heralded as the model for such a state.
     
    This is the single biggest reservation I have about the Alt-Right: their seaming love affair with Zionism. Just because we American nationalists aspire to the same thing as the Zionists--sovereign control over our territory--does not automatically mean that we are 'on the same side', as some Alt-Righters seem to think. Whether Israel exists or not has almost no bearing on our existence and sovereignty. Israel, for me, is just another foreign country ... and being a none-too-religious white Goy, I identify far, far more with the countries of Europe than with any Middle Eastern country.

    Moreover, some Alt-Righters seem to think they have a clever plot to turn the Zionists against the cultural-Marxist Jews. But in the end, who'll be duping whom? In concrete terms, what are the Zionists going to do to help us white Goyim take back America from the cultmarx Jews? After all, don't the Zionists themselves control our congress, along with a healthy chunk of finance and media? What interest would they conceivably have in giving that up? Remember what happened to the Christians a generation ago: 'Oh, if only we try being nice to the Jews and praising Israel, then their media will be nice to us for a change and give us some help.' So how did that turn out? From where I sit, the whole Moral Majority thing looks to have been an epic failure. Not only are they nowhere near restoring prayer in school, but now we have full-on homosexual marriage and even tranny bathrooms!

    I understand why some Alt-Righters would think of cultmarx Jews as a bigger danger than Zionists: it's because the former cause most of their trouble at home, while the latter cause most of it overseas. But foreign policy ultimately affects us, too. And please remember that both factions of Jews control certain--and extensive--aspects of the domestic establishment in order to further their goals.


    It explicitly rejects the honored “self-evident” principle that America is a propositional nation where everyone—whether from Sudan or Sweden—can become a 100% “real red blooded American” by embracing our principles and values.
     
    I used to believe in that propositional-national stuff when I was a kid, too. But over the course of my life, I noticed that they just kept changing the propositions at their convenience (not ours!), and so I grew cynical and rejected the whole concept.

    Think Marine Le Pen and the National Front in France or, in Germany, Frauke Petry and the Alternative for Germany, two nationalist, anti-immigration parties that arrived out “of nowhere” and are now serious electoral players.
     
    That's true of AfD, which was only founded in 2011, but it's definitely not true of Front national, which was founded in 1972 and has been a force in French politics for about twenty years now.

    (Incidentally, I really hope Le Pen wins. If Europe has any hope at all, it's France. And if France has any hope at all, it's the FN.)

    This is the single biggest reservation I have about the Alt-Right: their seaming love affair with Zionism.

    Breitbart is a pro-Israel Jew controlled organization. Part of the intended deception is to be called “anti-Semite.”

    The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves” – Vladimir Lenin

    A Jew must always lead the Alt-right – the Alt-left – and the Alt-middle.

    The Jew leader will squash any anti-Jew speech.

    It is no more difficult to understand then that.

    Peace — Art

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sherman
    Hey Genius,

    "Then that" should be "than that".

    It's no wonder Jews are so powerful.

    Their enemies are so stupid.

    Peace,

    Sherm
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Daniel Chieh
    Its a long-standing Chinese tradition to respect the meritocracy of the examination system, to be honest. I will stand that we would probably be fine with any minority that does well in the gaokao - and indeed, minorities actually do get affirmative action to help them.

    I've nothing against ethnic nationalists, but I think its excessive to assume that China has the same attitude. While there may be some Han favorable concepts, the idea of the meritocracy has a long and storied tradition in Chinese history, myth and storytelling concept.

    One of the myths I grew up with was of a young boy during the dynastic era, who secretly listened to lessons and studied in spite of the incredible poverty of his parents, studying by candlelight at night. His dedication allows him to take the imperial examination, where he outpaces all of the rich bullies that once had harried him and in the end, is rewarded to become the governor over the province. The Confucian ideal of education and hard work is reinforced, though he goes a little blind for studying in the night.

    “Its a long-standing Chinese tradition to respect the meritocracy of the examination system, to be honest. I will stand that we would probably be fine with any minority that does well in the gaokao – and indeed, minorities actually do get affirmative action to help them.”

    Meritocracy is all very well and good, but Chinese wasted the principle by selecting for talents that turned out to be useless. Yes, one can have a meritocratic system on who can write fancy calligraphy on an eight-legged essay, but what will such talent do for the nation?

    Suppose we select for elites in a nation purely on a meritocratic basis but the test involves chess and scrabble. Okay, it will select the smarter people to be sure, but in the service of what? Useless knowledge.

    So, meritocracy isn’t enough. It is relevancy of what is tested for merit. Otherwise, it turns into meretriciocracy.

    In hard sciences, meritocracy works fine in the West. But when it comes to social sciences, we have so much uselessness because PC forbids honest discussion. So, even as social sciences do select for ability and intelligence, the talent is really for the ability to lie, spin, and obfuscate than to explore and investigate honestly.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Meretriciocracy is the challenge of bureaucracies around the world, and as we can see, has now been proven to afflict us from over two thousand years. The eight-legged essay was probably not the best metric, but was hereditary influence much better?

    These days, we use other metrics but all too often, we're basically selecting for the ability to lie most efficiently.

    What do you think is the better idea?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    The media are always looking for new scandals. So, we have this-gate, that-gate.

    But given the failure of the media to investigate so much real news and instead give us fake news, the media scandal should be called Investi-Gate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  63. Corvinus says:

    “This apparent oddity flows from the movement’s paramount goal: preserving United States as a white ethno state, a nation with shared heritage, a single language and common biological ancestry.”

    Except from its inception the United States was not a white ethno state–it was a mix of various European ethnic groups along with Native American and imported Africans.

    “Central to their advocacy is the belief, putatively supported by both Darwinian evolutionary biology and everyday plain-to-see facts…”

    Alternative facts, yes. Fake News Stories, indeed.

    “that racial and ethnic groups differ by nature and these inherited traits persist across generations and go beyond physical attributes like skin color to include multiple behaviors–educational achievement, criminality, work ethic, and patterns of family life among many, many others.”

    There are much assumptions and questionable conclusions made by the human biodiversity crowd.

    “Humans are not blank slates.”

    Environmental and biological factors mold the person.

    “It champions freedom of association by restoring restrictive covenants, eliminating government anti-discrimation laws in housing and restaurants (the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in particular), and otherwise permitting Americans to escape those they want to avoid.”

    Nope. That ship has sailed. The people have spoken on this matter. Had Southrons just observed “separate but equal”, had their observed due process of the “darkies”, maybe, just maybe, there would not have been a push for such federal oversight. You do realize, correct, that there had been southern whites who had wanted to marry black people, who had wanted to sell their property to them, who wanted to hire them, but were denied by the law and social custom those liberties? How was their freedom of association protected in this case?

    Read More
    • Troll: Amasius
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  64. @Philip Smeeton
    We are in a permanent state of war and must never assume that we have won. We are in the process of becoming united now and for the first time in my life I see a glimmer of hope. Rather than despair we must redouble our efforts. The outcome of a war can never be certain unless the enemy is annihilated completely, and this must be our objective to attack and defeat the liberal-socialist agenda in all of its guises. and never rest or relax our vigilance. Be sure our opponents think likewise and want us dead.
    I look at things in the perspective of my life. I was born in 1945. My upbringing was normal. Everything was normal. Then things started to go wrong, mass-immigration, and it has been going down hill ever since. Anti-racism laws, absolute equality, inclusion, positive discrimination, hate-crime laws, minority rights, the vibrant society, all immigration is good for the country, multiculturalism, vast integration projects, huge welfare costs, the welfare system in decline, appeasement, discrimination against the native majority, surrender to vile ideology.
    A collective insanity has gripped the so-called elite and the highly educated. Denial of self at all costs. Absolute equality the one guiding principle.

    It’s an irony that the closer we move to becoming an actual minority, the more we will unite. I’m of the 1992 generation, so I was born into the thick of it – but I still feel hope for the future and even for my children.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. Because some members of the alt right are literally crazy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  66. Why Is the Alt-Right So Threatening?

    A significant part of the answer probably lies in the fact that Americans seem to thrive on feeling threatened about all kinds of bogeymen. If it’s not one thing, it’s another, or more likely, a whole passel of things.

    I think it’s always been the U S of Quivering Idiots and it seems to be getting worse. No wonder so many people in the US are on one form of mood altering drug or another most of the time.

    Gimmee a mud hut instead!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  67. @Philip Smeeton
    We are in a permanent state of war and must never assume that we have won. We are in the process of becoming united now and for the first time in my life I see a glimmer of hope. Rather than despair we must redouble our efforts. The outcome of a war can never be certain unless the enemy is annihilated completely, and this must be our objective to attack and defeat the liberal-socialist agenda in all of its guises. and never rest or relax our vigilance. Be sure our opponents think likewise and want us dead.
    I look at things in the perspective of my life. I was born in 1945. My upbringing was normal. Everything was normal. Then things started to go wrong, mass-immigration, and it has been going down hill ever since. Anti-racism laws, absolute equality, inclusion, positive discrimination, hate-crime laws, minority rights, the vibrant society, all immigration is good for the country, multiculturalism, vast integration projects, huge welfare costs, the welfare system in decline, appeasement, discrimination against the native majority, surrender to vile ideology.
    A collective insanity has gripped the so-called elite and the highly educated. Denial of self at all costs. Absolute equality the one guiding principle.

    But, which is that “native majority” so many of you are talking about?

    You could be “majority”, but, certainly, not “native”, none of you!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. @pyrrhus
    But wait. According to Weissberg, you are "xenophobic" if you think a country should be run for the benefit of the people who built and maintain it, and its culture.

    I would not judge wanting to be among whites and celebrating “white” culture xenophobic. That word is a slur. Rather, it is just normal for white people to want to be in a First World nation run by white people–things work, there is hardly any crime, streets are clean, people are polite and so on. In a draft version I mentioned how even white conservatives would not mind living in San Francisco despite is radical politics. Its all about civilization.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "I would not judge wanting to be among whites and celebrating “white” culture xenophobic. That word is a slur."

    Would it be called a slur to label whites who exercise their liberty to marry and procreate with non-whites as being "bad whites"?

    "Rather, it is just normal for white people to want to be in a First World nation run by white people–things work, there is hardly any crime, streets are clean, people are polite and so on."

    It' is normal for AMERICANS to ensure that their nation remains First World run by AMERICANS.

    "In a draft version I mentioned how even white conservatives would not mind living in San Francisco despite is radical politics. Its all about civilization."

    There's that term again...civilization. Sir, Asian and African cultures prior to significant European contact clearly met the definition of civilization. Now, these societies certainly lacked the technological prowess of the English or the French or the Spanish; nonetheless, they were content with their way of life. When European colonizers came knocking on their door via colonization and imperialism, their policies interrupted and interfered with potential advancements suited for their own environment made for and by Asians and Africans. Invade the world, invite the world indeed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Olaf says:
    @bjdubbs
    [Typos fixed.]

    Weissberg is a professor and he misuses "adverse" and misspells "miniscule"?

    He does neither.

    [Typos were fixed]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Sherman says:
    @Art
    This is the single biggest reservation I have about the Alt-Right: their seaming love affair with Zionism.

    Breitbart is a pro-Israel Jew controlled organization. Part of the intended deception is to be called "anti-Semite."

    "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves" - Vladimir Lenin

    A Jew must always lead the Alt-right - the Alt-left - and the Alt-middle.

    The Jew leader will squash any anti-Jew speech.

    It is no more difficult to understand then that.

    Peace --- Art

    Hey Genius,

    “Then that” should be “than that”.

    It’s no wonder Jews are so powerful.

    Their enemies are so stupid.

    Peace,

    Sherm

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art

    “Then that” should be “than that”.

    It’s no wonder Jews are so powerful.

    Their enemies are so stupid.
     
    Hey Sherm,

    Talk about dumb – the FBI actually found the bomb caller to the Jew centers before the ADL/Mossad did. (Saved his life.)

    He is an alt-left fake news reject from the Jew MSM. Just like everyone thought, one of your guys did it.

    To funny!

    Peace --- Art

    p.s. Moshe asks me to do the writing errors – he gets a kick out of you making a fool of yourself.

    p.s. If you Jews are so smart – why are you more disliked today then yesterday?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. SOL says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji
    I'm not sure what the Alt-Right is, but it appears that what is being discussed here is racism. Racism is not threatening because it's virtually non-existent and it has no future. Modern communications and travels make it look like an archaic superstition, and idiotic IQ-fetishism won't persuade anyone. What I see here is nothing more substantial than a reaction to, and trolling of the PC-crazy liberals.

    Says the guy sporting a Chinese monniker.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. JackOH says:

    Thanks, Prof. Weissberg.

    “In an increasingly heterogeneous society where there is always a potential for internecine strife, prudence dictates permitting everyone (regardless of race or ethnicity) to create their own “private” ethno states, but caution also counsels the Mafia’s Omerta, the code of silence” [emphasis mine].

    The role of civic silence, Omerta, studied ignorance, cultivated hypocrisy, strategic cowardice–call it what you will–in enforcing an odious political equilibrium is overlooked. I am confident to a certainty that among, say, the top quartile, many people simply think: “I’ve got mine, mo’ fo’, I’ve got mine.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  73. @Ace of Hearts
    You seemed to be obsessed with lesbians who may have gastrointestinal distress. Where does communism fit?

    “Where does communism fit?”

    In the Heart of the Aces!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Oldvannes says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    Its a long-standing Chinese tradition to respect the meritocracy of the examination system, to be honest. I will stand that we would probably be fine with any minority that does well in the gaokao - and indeed, minorities actually do get affirmative action to help them.

    I've nothing against ethnic nationalists, but I think its excessive to assume that China has the same attitude. While there may be some Han favorable concepts, the idea of the meritocracy has a long and storied tradition in Chinese history, myth and storytelling concept.

    One of the myths I grew up with was of a young boy during the dynastic era, who secretly listened to lessons and studied in spite of the incredible poverty of his parents, studying by candlelight at night. His dedication allows him to take the imperial examination, where he outpaces all of the rich bullies that once had harried him and in the end, is rewarded to become the governor over the province. The Confucian ideal of education and hard work is reinforced, though he goes a little blind for studying in the night.

    China has 1.2 billion people and fewer than 1500 naturalized non Chinese citizens.

    Non Han indigenous groups are not outsiders.

    The reason the Chinese, Koreans, Japanese etc have no overtly nationalist parties is because they have no large outside non indigenous groups to deal with. Nor, after watching the West implode, will they ever put their societies in such a position.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Well, they were once outsiders too. We just have more assimilated them. As for the West, the glory of the West is that their strong ideas can often forge them ahead to great new heights and the failure of the West is that their strong ideas seem to drive them to suicidal excesses, too.
    , @Dave Bowman
    Spot on, friend.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. @Philip Smeeton
    We are in a permanent state of war and must never assume that we have won. We are in the process of becoming united now and for the first time in my life I see a glimmer of hope. Rather than despair we must redouble our efforts. The outcome of a war can never be certain unless the enemy is annihilated completely, and this must be our objective to attack and defeat the liberal-socialist agenda in all of its guises. and never rest or relax our vigilance. Be sure our opponents think likewise and want us dead.
    I look at things in the perspective of my life. I was born in 1945. My upbringing was normal. Everything was normal. Then things started to go wrong, mass-immigration, and it has been going down hill ever since. Anti-racism laws, absolute equality, inclusion, positive discrimination, hate-crime laws, minority rights, the vibrant society, all immigration is good for the country, multiculturalism, vast integration projects, huge welfare costs, the welfare system in decline, appeasement, discrimination against the native majority, surrender to vile ideology.
    A collective insanity has gripped the so-called elite and the highly educated. Denial of self at all costs. Absolute equality the one guiding principle.

    surrender to vile ideology.

    Amen, brother

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    “To be sure, an American National Party would be unlikely to capture any office, particularly under its current leadership, but it could peel off 5% or so of the popular vote as a protest vote in at least some states.”

    This is a false impression that the MSM gives, that no one agrees with the Alt Right or is willing to support it. I think the recent elections put this one to rest- An alt right candidate can take the presidency.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  77. @Eustace Tilley (not)
    Not the same list.

    Dogs did not invent genital mutilation.

    Well they do lick themselves.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. @jacques sheete

    Let’s make a list of things created by sub Saharan Africans.
     
    Better yet, let’s make a list of things NOT created by sub Saharan Africans.

    Here's a partial list to get us started: Churchill, Stalin, FDR, GWB, Netanyahu, Hillary and Billy, Obama, nuclear weapons, drones, Three Mile Island, Fukushima, Chernobyl, aircraft carriers, huge armies and navies, huge, grotesque bureaucracies, crippling worldwide debt, ignorant, loud mouth, dim-witted self-serving, world straddling politicians, a monstrously corrupt press, corporations that require special favors including massive infusions of other people's money (bailouts), wage slavery and endless wars, huge brainwashing bureaucracies posing as centers of education...

    Like I said, that's just the barest beginning.

    …But the love of wilderness is more than a hunger for what is always beyond reach; it is also an expression of loyalty to the earth, the earth which bore us and sustains us, the only home we shall ever know, the only paradise we ever need — if only we had the eyes to see. Original sin, the true original sin, is the blind destruction for the sake of greed of this natural paradise which lies all around us — if only we were worthy of it.
    - Edward Abbey

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. Karl says:

    > preserving United States as a

    white

    > ethno state, a nation with shared heritage, a single language and common biological ancestry

    My two cents: I don’t agree that the majority of “alt-right” voters, want to include RACE in the “national conversation”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  80. Karl says:
    @Duncan Idaho
    Zionism wouldn't be so bad if:

    1. They did it on their own dime
    2. They didn't exercise an inordinate amount of influence on US policy

    41 Duncan Idaho > 1. They did it on their own dime 2. They didn’t exercise an inordinate amount of influence on US policy

    your bullet #1 is a valid concern, and buy the way is sometimes discussed here in terms of OUR OWN independence.

    your bullet #2 is nonsense. Whatever political vacuum we fill in Washington, is not a vacuum created by us. We do manipulate it for our own benefit, but it was there to start with. We didn’t create a White Race that pays more attention to HighSchool Football Championships than to the amount of bullion backing the paper currency.

    By the way – Germany & France have state-sponsored culture-dissemination programs throughout the world. Does it bother you?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Yep. It's not IQ. It's about family. Races and ethnic groups are simply extended families. Whites are my people, my family.

    I don't want a white homeland or white enclaves within the U.S. because we're smarter than blacks. I want a white homeland and our own enclaves because I want to be with my own. Even if adding high-IQ Asians would improve the economies of such areas, I wouldn't want them because they aren't my people. (Would Israel accept a million 130+ IQ Chinese? Of course not.)

    I don't want to live among whites because I hate other groups. I want to live among whites because I love my people.

    I want a white homeland and our own enclaves because I want to be with my own.

    It ain’t gonna happen…

    White women go to college so they can take 30 cocks up the ass and redefine this as “empowerment.”

    We are at war.

    A stable culture wont reappear until after the cleansing fire.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    Jewish elites have a powerful hold on PC, and their code of silence might be called
    Omatza.

    Read More
    • LOL: Stonehands
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  83. @Robert Magill
    Actually the first non-native inhabitants of what became America were black Africans. Seventy nine years before the Jamestown Colony was attempted a Spanish colony in the Carolinas was abandoned but not before many African slaves had escaped. They went to live with the Indian tribes in the region and constitute the first non-aboriginal people to inhabit America.
    http://robertmagill.wordpress.com

    Carolina? You’re probably thinking of the Black Seminoles of Florida.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Robert Magill
    No,actually there was a failed Spanish colony in the Carolinas much earlier c. 1528.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. A says:

    Great Article – but the real reason the (((media))) fears us is because we expose the jews.

    The JEWS who own the media, the JEWS who own the banks, the JEWS who own our politicians, the JEWS who are the most privileged and most wealthy people in America. The same jews who always bring up the imaginary holocaust, and the same jews who bring up antisemitism every time you tell the truth about Israel and how Israel continues to steal Palestenian land, jail Palestenians, torture Palestenians in jail and kill their people.

    It’s not antisemitism if I’m speaking the truth. It’s not antisemitism if we continue to expose the Jews sinister plan of killing our white brothers and sisters by importing muslims in Europe. Their plan is to destroy the white race which they hate more than anything.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
    Word-perfect. Right on, friend.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. @Mark Green
    This was a fairly good article, though it breaks no new ground and leaves out a lot. And as usual, Weissberg avoids the Jewish question as he zeros in on the incompatibility of Islam and Christianity. But that friction just part of the story. Indeed, America and the West didn't even have a Muslim problem until Israel became America's foremost sacred cow.

    As for the Alt-Right, Jewish activism is a central challenge to its political mission, which is to regain white independence and freedom of association for white Americans.

    Jewish/Zionist interests however are at odds with many of the aspirations held by those in the Alt-Right movement since race and religion are involved. So let's be candid. Soft Jewish tyranny in America has had an immensely destructive impact on white America--yet Weissberg and countless other (mostly Jewish) intellectuals ignore this fact.

    Weissberg cites imported 'Syrian goat-herders' as a threat to white Christian American culture, but not, apparently, Jewish ACLU lawyers or Jewish Zionist activists and donors. His narrow view is highly deceptive.

    Indeed, over the past six decades, organized Jewish activists (sometimes operating under the banner of atheism or Constitutional fundamentalism) have banished Christianity from the public square as well as the American classroom. Yet Zionism and Holocaust indoctrination get a pass. Why does Weissberg invariably ignore this transformation?--not to mention numerous double-standards that benefit Jewry at a cost to others?

    We don't know since Weissberg does not examine it forthrightly.

    Further, the theological divide between Judaism and Christianity is probably deeper that that which separates Islam from either faith. After all, Islam considers Christ a prophet. Judaism sees him as an enemy and a fraud. But Weissberg would pretend that America's 'Judeo-Christian heritage' is genuine. Many in the Alt-right see through this deception. Not Weissberg.

    As for the demographic transitions now underway in the West, why are North African and Middle East Muslims flooding Europe and America in the first place?

    This unprecedented explosion of refugees is due to pan-Zionist militarism which has helped destroy Iraq, Palestine, Libya and Syria. Terrorism and the refugee crisis is a byproduct of Zio-American wars. Yet Weissberg habitually ignores this fact.

    In a similar vein, Jewish donors to both of America's two major parties have kept illegal immigration off the political table for decades. They want the West's borders largely OPEN. Trump changed this. Many powerful Jews however want white rule in the West diminished if not eliminated. Israel however is allowed to subjugate and expel its indigenous non-Jews.

    Weissberg implicitly pretends that political friction between whites and Jews does not and should not exist in America. But that can't be true. Countless Jews are helping to orchestrate America's unwanted demographic transformation as well as Washington's serial warfare in the Middle East and beyond.

    This power imbalance explains why Hollywood, our glorious 'liberal' news media, and our government schools bombard white America with Israeli-Jewish-Auschwitz-KKK-slavery-white supremacism drek each and every day. So take your Jewish medicine children. Just turn on your TV for all the necessary news, information and entertainment. After that, you can visit your local Holocaust museum.

    This kosher propaganda matrix exists by design. Hasn't Weissberg noticed?

    This ubiquitous mix of disinformation, propaganda and hasbara keeps Jews and their progeny aware and cohesive while our children and community are guilt-ridden and divided. Many in the Alt-right understands this. I bet Weissberg secretly does, too.

    Indeed, there are so many double-standards and special privileges that Jews now enjoy in America that it's impossible not to notice. Israeli-Americans have carved out a privileged niche for themselves. But saying so is 'anti-Semitic'. Yet Weissberg pretends not to notice. He's got his Jewish blinders on.

    Indeed, due to inordinate Jewish influence, average Americans rarely get to see programs, films or academic lessons that examine organized Jewish malfeasance--from international crime, to heavy-handed Zionist lobbying, to the spread of harmful ideologies such as communism; not to mention serial, ongoing, pro-Zionist wars in the Middle East.

    These multiple, Mideast wars/interventions may now seem 'normal', but they are part of a vast, serial, criminal enterprise. Just count the bodies.

    These is a complex and explosive subject. But the examination of this phenomena remains under very tight supervision. Organized censorship is a key tool here. As is media control And what group, Mr. Weissberg, most ably manages this censorship and control?

    America has a Jewish problem. This quandary covers a lot of ground. It involves not only speech restrictions and taboos involving race and religion, but the strategic abuse of political power involving intervention and war. Jews have brilliantly steered America into a uniform, pro-Zionist direction.

    And since Jews are Caucasian, they demand, expect and now receive full access to white-majority groups, events, assemblies, corporations, colleges and what-have-you. But if you are white and you try to exclude Jews (or advance specifically non-Jewish interests such as neutrality in the Middle East) then you've got a fight on your hands. This is where the taboo of 'anti-Semitism' is played out in our Zionist-friendly media. It's a another artful and brilliant accomplishment by Israeli-Americans. On this topic, Weissberg is also silent.

    Meanwhile, Jews demand the right to create and/or sustain all-Jewish groups, lobbies, federations, union and associations. And many of these exclusive, coordinated, all-Jewish organizations hold immense political power. They unashamedly advocate for Jewish causes and interests. Yet we're not supposed to notice any conflict of group interests involving Jews and whites in America. Israel and America: in love forever.

    These distortions and fantasies have disarmed whites and empowered Jews. This is why the Alt-right movement is under constant pressure by the (Jewish-dominated) Left. White interests are ultimately at odds with Jewish supremacy.

    The Alt-Right therefore threatens Jewish power in America. It's inevitable. Weissberg surely understands this. But he's trying to manage it via omission. This is a familiar trick.

    And just who are the dominant agents in the conspiracy to criminalize political speech, Mr. Weissberg? (And yes, it is a conspiracy.)

    You know. We know.

    Ultimately, the Alt-Right wants the right to advocate for white interests--free of Jewish oversight. This is not unreasonable. But this distinction of group interests undermines Jewish influence as well as Israel's artificial centrality in American life. That's the rub. This is why there's so much chatter about Trump's alleged 'anti-Semitism' and his ties to 'white supremacism'. This entire campaign is another Jewish canard. They are endless.

    Simply speaking, there are enormous problems associated with unchecked Jewish power in American life. Ignoring them will not solve the problem or make it go away. Too bad Weissberg is ultimately carrying water for the Zionist establishment. This deception deserves to be unmasked.

    Could not agree more.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. @Seamus Padraig
    Carolina? You're probably thinking of the Black Seminoles of Florida.

    No,actually there was a failed Spanish colony in the Carolinas much earlier c. 1528.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    Did not know that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. @ThereisaGod
    The globalist oligarchy opposes and (successfully) forbids whites collectively defending their interests. How can one explain this?
    The most obvious one is that Jews (VERY committed to their own ethnic interests) have taken over leadership of the western world from whites and are determined to eliminate their major competitor for once and for all ... via these kind of cultural mind wars. Oh, and by engineered mass immigration of Africans and Arabs into all (of what were once understood to be) white societies.

    Anyone got a better explanation?

    The only other possible explanation, as I see it, is that the invisible "oligarchy" driving global events are not primarily Jewish [they are certainly not ENTIRELY Jewish] but rather (for want of a better word) Satanists who, by definition, are entirely devoted to self-interest and who consider ordinary folk to be, at best, slaves and, at worst, an enemy to be systematically enslaved or destroyed. These Satanists, being very cunning, USE 'The Jewish People'. They hide behind their amplified victimhood and use Jews, whenever possible, to front their criminal projects (in business, banking and government) in the public domain. So that if we turn on our masters we will attack only Jews and the entirely innocent ones (NEARLY ALL Jews who are merely brainwashed muppets like ourselves)

    Either way, the issue of who are are our warmongering diabolical rulers cannot be addressed without addressing this Jewish question. If Jews genuinely turn against their own leadership as Christ commanded them ... we will all be saved. Without this collective Jewish change of heart it is hard to see anything but disaster on the horizon. One way or another.

    Jews need to ask themselves.
    This 'Equality', 'Liberal', 'anti-Racist' agenda to which we are all committed ... are we committed because we LOVE ALL THE HUMAN RACE and will defend and protect universal rights? Or are we committed because we want to live in a society dominated by the globalist international bankers driving this Imperialist agenda.
    Do we REALLY love our neighbours or do we love the tyranny this hijacking of human moral conscience is actually manufacturing.
    Because it is "OUR" tyranny?
    The intention at the bottom (in Communist societies) can be sincere (if stupid). The intention at the top is always TOTALLY INSINCERE. The people at the top do not care about "equality" AT ALL!
    AT ALL!
    And sincerity (regarding spirituality and, please reflect on it, our eternal destiny) is everything.

    My answer would be the predatory workings of capitalism, in all its economic, political, social, educational and morally dogmatic aspects. For the elite minority who are pushing these diversity policies, this is a divide and conquer tactic, which is exactly the tactic you need to use when you are greatly outnumbered, and a tactic that goes back thousands of years. For both capitalism and Judaism, the strategy is that a united us will defeat a divided them no matter how greatly they outnumber us. Note how easily the Jewish elite join together with the gentile capitalist elite, and have common goals. There is a unity that transcends both systems.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig

    Note how easily the Jewish elite join together with the gentile capitalist elite, and have common goals. There is a unity that transcends both systems.
     
    It's now one system, the AngloZionist System, as our own Saker calls it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. MartinA says:
    @bjdubbs
    [Typos fixed.]

    Weissberg is a professor and he misuses "adverse" and misspells "miniscule"?

    Maybe Professor Weissberg still writes without a spellchecker? In this case it is commendable. Using a spellchecker hands the language over to central administration. Sooner or later they will start to manipulate it. Language is the gateway to the mind.

    (im not a native speaker so I probably do alot of spelling errors)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. Corvinus says:
    @Robert Weissberg
    I would not judge wanting to be among whites and celebrating "white" culture xenophobic. That word is a slur. Rather, it is just normal for white people to want to be in a First World nation run by white people--things work, there is hardly any crime, streets are clean, people are polite and so on. In a draft version I mentioned how even white conservatives would not mind living in San Francisco despite is radical politics. Its all about civilization.

    “I would not judge wanting to be among whites and celebrating “white” culture xenophobic. That word is a slur.”

    Would it be called a slur to label whites who exercise their liberty to marry and procreate with non-whites as being “bad whites”?

    “Rather, it is just normal for white people to want to be in a First World nation run by white people–things work, there is hardly any crime, streets are clean, people are polite and so on.”

    It’ is normal for AMERICANS to ensure that their nation remains First World run by AMERICANS.

    “In a draft version I mentioned how even white conservatives would not mind living in San Francisco despite is radical politics. Its all about civilization.”

    There’s that term again…civilization. Sir, Asian and African cultures prior to significant European contact clearly met the definition of civilization. Now, these societies certainly lacked the technological prowess of the English or the French or the Spanish; nonetheless, they were content with their way of life. When European colonizers came knocking on their door via colonization and imperialism, their policies interrupted and interfered with potential advancements suited for their own environment made for and by Asians and Africans. Invade the world, invite the world indeed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    are jews subject to the charge of xenophobic, or racist, or any of the current words that are defined as bigotry?

    Words change. My old , 1963 Webster's Collegiate...defines bigot as someone who refuses new information and gets indignant about others' contrary opinions.

    Today, if you google bigot, bigot is a racist, the sin of sins, the guilty to be cast down to the Whatever.

    liberals are bigots. Joe Webb
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. anarchyst says:
    @Mark Green
    This was a fairly good article, though it breaks no new ground and leaves out a lot. And as usual, Weissberg avoids the Jewish question as he zeros in on the incompatibility of Islam and Christianity. But that friction just part of the story. Indeed, America and the West didn't even have a Muslim problem until Israel became America's foremost sacred cow.

    As for the Alt-Right, Jewish activism is a central challenge to its political mission, which is to regain white independence and freedom of association for white Americans.

    Jewish/Zionist interests however are at odds with many of the aspirations held by those in the Alt-Right movement since race and religion are involved. So let's be candid. Soft Jewish tyranny in America has had an immensely destructive impact on white America--yet Weissberg and countless other (mostly Jewish) intellectuals ignore this fact.

    Weissberg cites imported 'Syrian goat-herders' as a threat to white Christian American culture, but not, apparently, Jewish ACLU lawyers or Jewish Zionist activists and donors. His narrow view is highly deceptive.

    Indeed, over the past six decades, organized Jewish activists (sometimes operating under the banner of atheism or Constitutional fundamentalism) have banished Christianity from the public square as well as the American classroom. Yet Zionism and Holocaust indoctrination get a pass. Why does Weissberg invariably ignore this transformation?--not to mention numerous double-standards that benefit Jewry at a cost to others?

    We don't know since Weissberg does not examine it forthrightly.

    Further, the theological divide between Judaism and Christianity is probably deeper that that which separates Islam from either faith. After all, Islam considers Christ a prophet. Judaism sees him as an enemy and a fraud. But Weissberg would pretend that America's 'Judeo-Christian heritage' is genuine. Many in the Alt-right see through this deception. Not Weissberg.

    As for the demographic transitions now underway in the West, why are North African and Middle East Muslims flooding Europe and America in the first place?

    This unprecedented explosion of refugees is due to pan-Zionist militarism which has helped destroy Iraq, Palestine, Libya and Syria. Terrorism and the refugee crisis is a byproduct of Zio-American wars. Yet Weissberg habitually ignores this fact.

    In a similar vein, Jewish donors to both of America's two major parties have kept illegal immigration off the political table for decades. They want the West's borders largely OPEN. Trump changed this. Many powerful Jews however want white rule in the West diminished if not eliminated. Israel however is allowed to subjugate and expel its indigenous non-Jews.

    Weissberg implicitly pretends that political friction between whites and Jews does not and should not exist in America. But that can't be true. Countless Jews are helping to orchestrate America's unwanted demographic transformation as well as Washington's serial warfare in the Middle East and beyond.

    This power imbalance explains why Hollywood, our glorious 'liberal' news media, and our government schools bombard white America with Israeli-Jewish-Auschwitz-KKK-slavery-white supremacism drek each and every day. So take your Jewish medicine children. Just turn on your TV for all the necessary news, information and entertainment. After that, you can visit your local Holocaust museum.

    This kosher propaganda matrix exists by design. Hasn't Weissberg noticed?

    This ubiquitous mix of disinformation, propaganda and hasbara keeps Jews and their progeny aware and cohesive while our children and community are guilt-ridden and divided. Many in the Alt-right understands this. I bet Weissberg secretly does, too.

    Indeed, there are so many double-standards and special privileges that Jews now enjoy in America that it's impossible not to notice. Israeli-Americans have carved out a privileged niche for themselves. But saying so is 'anti-Semitic'. Yet Weissberg pretends not to notice. He's got his Jewish blinders on.

    Indeed, due to inordinate Jewish influence, average Americans rarely get to see programs, films or academic lessons that examine organized Jewish malfeasance--from international crime, to heavy-handed Zionist lobbying, to the spread of harmful ideologies such as communism; not to mention serial, ongoing, pro-Zionist wars in the Middle East.

    These multiple, Mideast wars/interventions may now seem 'normal', but they are part of a vast, serial, criminal enterprise. Just count the bodies.

    These is a complex and explosive subject. But the examination of this phenomena remains under very tight supervision. Organized censorship is a key tool here. As is media control And what group, Mr. Weissberg, most ably manages this censorship and control?

    America has a Jewish problem. This quandary covers a lot of ground. It involves not only speech restrictions and taboos involving race and religion, but the strategic abuse of political power involving intervention and war. Jews have brilliantly steered America into a uniform, pro-Zionist direction.

    And since Jews are Caucasian, they demand, expect and now receive full access to white-majority groups, events, assemblies, corporations, colleges and what-have-you. But if you are white and you try to exclude Jews (or advance specifically non-Jewish interests such as neutrality in the Middle East) then you've got a fight on your hands. This is where the taboo of 'anti-Semitism' is played out in our Zionist-friendly media. It's a another artful and brilliant accomplishment by Israeli-Americans. On this topic, Weissberg is also silent.

    Meanwhile, Jews demand the right to create and/or sustain all-Jewish groups, lobbies, federations, union and associations. And many of these exclusive, coordinated, all-Jewish organizations hold immense political power. They unashamedly advocate for Jewish causes and interests. Yet we're not supposed to notice any conflict of group interests involving Jews and whites in America. Israel and America: in love forever.

    These distortions and fantasies have disarmed whites and empowered Jews. This is why the Alt-right movement is under constant pressure by the (Jewish-dominated) Left. White interests are ultimately at odds with Jewish supremacy.

    The Alt-Right therefore threatens Jewish power in America. It's inevitable. Weissberg surely understands this. But he's trying to manage it via omission. This is a familiar trick.

    And just who are the dominant agents in the conspiracy to criminalize political speech, Mr. Weissberg? (And yes, it is a conspiracy.)

    You know. We know.

    Ultimately, the Alt-Right wants the right to advocate for white interests--free of Jewish oversight. This is not unreasonable. But this distinction of group interests undermines Jewish influence as well as Israel's artificial centrality in American life. That's the rub. This is why there's so much chatter about Trump's alleged 'anti-Semitism' and his ties to 'white supremacism'. This entire campaign is another Jewish canard. They are endless.

    Simply speaking, there are enormous problems associated with unchecked Jewish power in American life. Ignoring them will not solve the problem or make it go away. Too bad Weissberg is ultimately carrying water for the Zionist establishment. This deception deserves to be unmasked.

    You bring out a good point. Actually, Judaism and Islam are more alike than most realize.
    Both the Judaic Talmud and Islamic Qur’an espouse virtually the same hostility against outsiders, proscribing much greater punishments for those who transgress against each respective “tribe”, while proscribing little or no punishment for those of their respective “tribes” who transgress against “non-believers”.
    Having read both the Judaic Talmud and the Islamic Qur’an, there are virtually identical passages that espouse the above.
    One could argue that Islam is an Arabicized form of Judaism.
    BOTH Judaism and Islam promote their own (virtually identical) forms of supremacism.
    There is one divergence of note:
    Judaism regards Jesus Christ as an apostate, boiling in excrement for eternity while his mother Mary is considered a harlot who consorted with a Roman soldier.
    Islam regards Jesus Christ as a great prophet–not the “Son of God”, but a great prophet, nevertheless. Christ’s mother Mary is given a high place of honor and is specifically mentioned in the Qur’an.
    Now which “belief system” harbors a greater hostility towards Christianity??

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. rw95 says:

    In what world is Dicky “Controlled Opposition” Spencer threatening?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  92. anarchyst says:
    @Mark Green
    This was a fairly good article, though it breaks no new ground and leaves out a lot. And as usual, Weissberg avoids the Jewish question as he zeros in on the incompatibility of Islam and Christianity. But that friction just part of the story. Indeed, America and the West didn't even have a Muslim problem until Israel became America's foremost sacred cow.

    As for the Alt-Right, Jewish activism is a central challenge to its political mission, which is to regain white independence and freedom of association for white Americans.

    Jewish/Zionist interests however are at odds with many of the aspirations held by those in the Alt-Right movement since race and religion are involved. So let's be candid. Soft Jewish tyranny in America has had an immensely destructive impact on white America--yet Weissberg and countless other (mostly Jewish) intellectuals ignore this fact.

    Weissberg cites imported 'Syrian goat-herders' as a threat to white Christian American culture, but not, apparently, Jewish ACLU lawyers or Jewish Zionist activists and donors. His narrow view is highly deceptive.

    Indeed, over the past six decades, organized Jewish activists (sometimes operating under the banner of atheism or Constitutional fundamentalism) have banished Christianity from the public square as well as the American classroom. Yet Zionism and Holocaust indoctrination get a pass. Why does Weissberg invariably ignore this transformation?--not to mention numerous double-standards that benefit Jewry at a cost to others?

    We don't know since Weissberg does not examine it forthrightly.

    Further, the theological divide between Judaism and Christianity is probably deeper that that which separates Islam from either faith. After all, Islam considers Christ a prophet. Judaism sees him as an enemy and a fraud. But Weissberg would pretend that America's 'Judeo-Christian heritage' is genuine. Many in the Alt-right see through this deception. Not Weissberg.

    As for the demographic transitions now underway in the West, why are North African and Middle East Muslims flooding Europe and America in the first place?

    This unprecedented explosion of refugees is due to pan-Zionist militarism which has helped destroy Iraq, Palestine, Libya and Syria. Terrorism and the refugee crisis is a byproduct of Zio-American wars. Yet Weissberg habitually ignores this fact.

    In a similar vein, Jewish donors to both of America's two major parties have kept illegal immigration off the political table for decades. They want the West's borders largely OPEN. Trump changed this. Many powerful Jews however want white rule in the West diminished if not eliminated. Israel however is allowed to subjugate and expel its indigenous non-Jews.

    Weissberg implicitly pretends that political friction between whites and Jews does not and should not exist in America. But that can't be true. Countless Jews are helping to orchestrate America's unwanted demographic transformation as well as Washington's serial warfare in the Middle East and beyond.

    This power imbalance explains why Hollywood, our glorious 'liberal' news media, and our government schools bombard white America with Israeli-Jewish-Auschwitz-KKK-slavery-white supremacism drek each and every day. So take your Jewish medicine children. Just turn on your TV for all the necessary news, information and entertainment. After that, you can visit your local Holocaust museum.

    This kosher propaganda matrix exists by design. Hasn't Weissberg noticed?

    This ubiquitous mix of disinformation, propaganda and hasbara keeps Jews and their progeny aware and cohesive while our children and community are guilt-ridden and divided. Many in the Alt-right understands this. I bet Weissberg secretly does, too.

    Indeed, there are so many double-standards and special privileges that Jews now enjoy in America that it's impossible not to notice. Israeli-Americans have carved out a privileged niche for themselves. But saying so is 'anti-Semitic'. Yet Weissberg pretends not to notice. He's got his Jewish blinders on.

    Indeed, due to inordinate Jewish influence, average Americans rarely get to see programs, films or academic lessons that examine organized Jewish malfeasance--from international crime, to heavy-handed Zionist lobbying, to the spread of harmful ideologies such as communism; not to mention serial, ongoing, pro-Zionist wars in the Middle East.

    These multiple, Mideast wars/interventions may now seem 'normal', but they are part of a vast, serial, criminal enterprise. Just count the bodies.

    These is a complex and explosive subject. But the examination of this phenomena remains under very tight supervision. Organized censorship is a key tool here. As is media control And what group, Mr. Weissberg, most ably manages this censorship and control?

    America has a Jewish problem. This quandary covers a lot of ground. It involves not only speech restrictions and taboos involving race and religion, but the strategic abuse of political power involving intervention and war. Jews have brilliantly steered America into a uniform, pro-Zionist direction.

    And since Jews are Caucasian, they demand, expect and now receive full access to white-majority groups, events, assemblies, corporations, colleges and what-have-you. But if you are white and you try to exclude Jews (or advance specifically non-Jewish interests such as neutrality in the Middle East) then you've got a fight on your hands. This is where the taboo of 'anti-Semitism' is played out in our Zionist-friendly media. It's a another artful and brilliant accomplishment by Israeli-Americans. On this topic, Weissberg is also silent.

    Meanwhile, Jews demand the right to create and/or sustain all-Jewish groups, lobbies, federations, union and associations. And many of these exclusive, coordinated, all-Jewish organizations hold immense political power. They unashamedly advocate for Jewish causes and interests. Yet we're not supposed to notice any conflict of group interests involving Jews and whites in America. Israel and America: in love forever.

    These distortions and fantasies have disarmed whites and empowered Jews. This is why the Alt-right movement is under constant pressure by the (Jewish-dominated) Left. White interests are ultimately at odds with Jewish supremacy.

    The Alt-Right therefore threatens Jewish power in America. It's inevitable. Weissberg surely understands this. But he's trying to manage it via omission. This is a familiar trick.

    And just who are the dominant agents in the conspiracy to criminalize political speech, Mr. Weissberg? (And yes, it is a conspiracy.)

    You know. We know.

    Ultimately, the Alt-Right wants the right to advocate for white interests--free of Jewish oversight. This is not unreasonable. But this distinction of group interests undermines Jewish influence as well as Israel's artificial centrality in American life. That's the rub. This is why there's so much chatter about Trump's alleged 'anti-Semitism' and his ties to 'white supremacism'. This entire campaign is another Jewish canard. They are endless.

    Simply speaking, there are enormous problems associated with unchecked Jewish power in American life. Ignoring them will not solve the problem or make it go away. Too bad Weissberg is ultimately carrying water for the Zionist establishment. This deception deserves to be unmasked.

    A major problem is the concept of “dual citizenship”.
    The United States government and other influential organizations are infested (infected?) with these “dual nationality” types.
    In fact, there are many thousands of government officials and their offspring who have served in the IDF, (Israeli Defense Forces) which should be contrary to the citizenship laws of the United States and should result in prosecution and loss of American citizenship. This behavior, in itself should be raising many “red flags” as to who really runs this country.
    “Dual nationality” and “dual citizenship” must be abolished.
    Any one holding “dual citizenship should be prohibited from having any influence or working in any capacity for any United States government agency…

    Read More
    • Agree: dc.sunsets
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. @Clearpoint
    My answer would be the predatory workings of capitalism, in all its economic, political, social, educational and morally dogmatic aspects. For the elite minority who are pushing these diversity policies, this is a divide and conquer tactic, which is exactly the tactic you need to use when you are greatly outnumbered, and a tactic that goes back thousands of years. For both capitalism and Judaism, the strategy is that a united us will defeat a divided them no matter how greatly they outnumber us. Note how easily the Jewish elite join together with the gentile capitalist elite, and have common goals. There is a unity that transcends both systems.

    Note how easily the Jewish elite join together with the gentile capitalist elite, and have common goals. There is a unity that transcends both systems.

    It’s now one system, the AngloZionist System, as our own Saker calls it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. @Robert Magill
    No,actually there was a failed Spanish colony in the Carolinas much earlier c. 1528.

    Did not know that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. joe webb says:
    @Corvinus
    "I would not judge wanting to be among whites and celebrating “white” culture xenophobic. That word is a slur."

    Would it be called a slur to label whites who exercise their liberty to marry and procreate with non-whites as being "bad whites"?

    "Rather, it is just normal for white people to want to be in a First World nation run by white people–things work, there is hardly any crime, streets are clean, people are polite and so on."

    It' is normal for AMERICANS to ensure that their nation remains First World run by AMERICANS.

    "In a draft version I mentioned how even white conservatives would not mind living in San Francisco despite is radical politics. Its all about civilization."

    There's that term again...civilization. Sir, Asian and African cultures prior to significant European contact clearly met the definition of civilization. Now, these societies certainly lacked the technological prowess of the English or the French or the Spanish; nonetheless, they were content with their way of life. When European colonizers came knocking on their door via colonization and imperialism, their policies interrupted and interfered with potential advancements suited for their own environment made for and by Asians and Africans. Invade the world, invite the world indeed.

    are jews subject to the charge of xenophobic, or racist, or any of the current words that are defined as bigotry?

    Words change. My old , 1963 Webster’s Collegiate…defines bigot as someone who refuses new information and gets indignant about others’ contrary opinions.

    Today, if you google bigot, bigot is a racist, the sin of sins, the guilty to be cast down to the Whatever.

    liberals are bigots. Joe Webb

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "are jews subject to the charge of xenophobic, or racist, or any of the current words that are defined as bigotry?"

    EVERY group is subject to being called a racist. Just don't expect that group to take those accusations kindly or to heart.

    Now, are Jews compared to any other group more racist? If yes, in what ways?

    "liberals are bigots."

    No, only those liberals who meet the criteria of bigotry. The statement you made is a generalization. Now, are conservatives other than bigots? If yes, in what ways?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @PV van der Byl
    Agree. Just consider Scandinavia.

    And the vast majority of Swedish media that pushes this rampant strain of PC is owned by Jews. The Swedes didn’t push it on themselves.

    Jews are where the conversation about the West’s downfall begins and ends. If anyone tries to tell you otherwise they a) aren’t informed, or b) are running cover.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    Look up "Barbara Lerner Spectre" to see what the "chosen" have in store for all of us whites...
    , @Jake
    The conversation about the West's downfall begins with the Reformation and proceeds to the Enlightenment. Jews did not cause those things. Jews simply came out of each the biggest winner, because the white Christian West chose to rebel against itself.

    Every Jews in the 'western' would could be expelled today, and the suicide of the West would continue, perhaps even speeding up, if the West did not follow the path the Russians have recently begun: back to Christendom.

    It is either Christ or chaos. It is either Christendom or European cultures and genetics will be swamped by the Third World.
    , @PV van der Byl
    Virtually all Swedish media, including state owned television, pushes this.

    Name the Swedish media that "are owned by Jews."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. Corvinus says:
    @joe webb
    are jews subject to the charge of xenophobic, or racist, or any of the current words that are defined as bigotry?

    Words change. My old , 1963 Webster's Collegiate...defines bigot as someone who refuses new information and gets indignant about others' contrary opinions.

    Today, if you google bigot, bigot is a racist, the sin of sins, the guilty to be cast down to the Whatever.

    liberals are bigots. Joe Webb

    “are jews subject to the charge of xenophobic, or racist, or any of the current words that are defined as bigotry?”

    EVERY group is subject to being called a racist. Just don’t expect that group to take those accusations kindly or to heart.

    Now, are Jews compared to any other group more racist? If yes, in what ways?

    “liberals are bigots.”

    No, only those liberals who meet the criteria of bigotry. The statement you made is a generalization. Now, are conservatives other than bigots? If yes, in what ways?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    EVERY group is subject to being called a racist.
     
    Hmm. I don't think so; not in the sense you presented it here. An institution, ideology ('liberalism', for example), or practice can be racist. But calling an ethnic group composed of individuals of a variety of ideologies, mindsets, and all different walks of life 'racist' makes no sense at all, imo.

    In fact, what you're doing here is introducing a negative ethnic stereotype, which itself is rather problematic...

    , @joe webb
    using my old Webster's definition of bigot, that it is someone intolerant of new information/ideas, and completely closed minded, and emotionally very reactive, etc. then conservatives too can be bigots.

    however, the conservative, holds on to old truths and prejudices, which are usually correct. Etc.

    The liberal commies, etc. are in total emotional reaction to the new old information on race, intelligence, and so on.

    They think Evolution stopped short of Equality, etc.

    So, my personal experience with conservatives in regard to race,jews, etc. when i was still a liberal of sorts, was that they were not bigoted in the above sense. They always treated me well.

    Liberals, etc today are besides themselves with fury. For example I was successfully flirting with a y
    young MD at the gym, but had stayed away for a year or so, cuz i though she was a jew. Since I was quitting cuz of the negroes, and other techies, and chinks...and stupid white bone-smashers, I decided to check this gal out and finally approached her.

    We were getting along famously, ( you know how the ladies can gush ) and as it turned out she was not a jew, but an Iranian, and we clicked on the Jewish Question, I mentioned that I was kinda conservative. End of Story. She went ballistic. Are you a Trump guy? Goodbye to rationality as the female, especially , psyche kicked it, even in a smart gal, again, MD. She said that she knew how I thought and felt.

    That is aggression. I told her that she did not know. I could have said that I knew how she felt and thought since I had been there as a lib-rad. I gave her the global north/south Ice Age and Out of Africa thing, She got it immediately, but then got even more nutty.

    So, liberals are bigots. Big Time. Conservatives can be so too, but in my experience are much less likely to be so.

    JW
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @jack ryan
    Politics certainly makes for strange bedfellows. The American Lib Left Democrat elites are now losing their collective minds hating on all things Trump and hating Trump supporters (poor and working class White Americans, White Southerners, The Russians, Alt Right activists who don't hate their own people and who correctly want peace with Russia and all remaining still majority White European nations and who also opposed the Neo Conservative intrigues and counter productive wars in the Middle East)

    So it's a weird reality that the very Jewish dominated Liberal Left media, or just the MSM - Mainstream Media - hates Trump and thus takes the side of Muslim migrants, tries to deny Muslim atrocities in Europe or just the 1 million plus Muslim male migrants that invaded Western Europe in 2016.

    It's a weird reality that American Lib Left Jews and also yeah Neo Conservatives Jews like William Kristol, David Frum, Elliot Abrams etc are on the same side of 1 billion plus world Muslims in everything that counts except Israel vs the Palestinians.

    Why? -The Muslims and Jews both hate or fear White Europeans, White European Americans - a lot of this is envy (Jewish women who are piss*** that Billy Joels of the world prefer Nordic Gentile blonde GFs, wives than Jewess wives. Few men of anything ethnic, cultural, religious backgrounds want to date or marry the likes of Elena Kagan or Ruth Bader Ginzberg. How many Jewish husbands did Christie Brinkley have?

    This weird Jewish Muslim alliance against Whites isn't anything new. Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492 or put under the Inquisition in large part for taking the Muslim side against Spanish Catholics Whites, for being Muslim tax collectors, for trafficking White girls to Muslim buyers.

    Here's the best history lesson of Whites (Catholics) Muslim Moors and the Jews in between in 15th Century Spain.

    This sh*** is happening now here in North America plus we had all kinds of weird other players like Social Justice Warriors pretending to be Black or Native American Indian (Sen. Elizabeth Warren)

    Spain 15th Century - Why the Jews were expelled Occidental Dissent

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2015/10/12/15th-century-spain-muslims-jews-and-our-guys/

    Yes, politics makes for strange bedfellows. The MSM, Neo Cons, Lib Left is spreading the meme that Trump and the Trump admin is in "Bed With the Russians"!

    I would love to be in bed with beautiful Russians like Miss Anna Kournikova and Maria Sharapova. Yeah I hear the rumors that both these Russian gals work for the KGB. If they interrogated me...

    I'd talk.

    :-)

    “Billy Joels of the world prefer Nordic Gentile blonde GFs, wives than Jewess wives. Few men of anything ethnic, cultural, religious backgrounds want to date or marry the likes of Elena Kagan or Ruth Bader Ginzberg. How many Jewish husbands did Christie Brinkley have?”

    There is certainly the Portnoy Complex, but most white women, even Nordic women, do NOT look like fashion models.

    Also, the kind of Jewesses that make it in intellectual sphere tend to be geekettes, but this is true of every group. Most brainy women of all races look rather plain or homely..

    White, Asian, Hispanic, Jewish, etc babes generally don’t become successful in brainy fields.
    Remember Janet Reno?

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    Was Janet Reno a woman or a man? (ugggh)...
    , @dcite

    Most brainy women of all races look rather plain or homely..
     
    Most people of any IQ, are average looking, because most of us don't live in Lake Wobegone where all children are above average. Still, there were studies showing that higher intelligence is associated in both sexes with better physical development and better looks. I know of a fair number of women scientists at the local space agency who are gorgeous. While personal anecdotes are not proof to any except oneself, two very beautiful girls in my senior class, scored highest in IQ, upper 1% in the world, overall. A 16 year old beauty I once worked with (who married an 18 year old husband and is still married to him decades later) was VP of a major bank by the time she was in her 20s. She graduated high school early and did college while working a real job. Seen this sort of thing enough to have a tendency to associate exceptional beauty in women with great brains and success, unless they choose to just "use" the looks and then they seem dumber than dirt. Depends.

    Interesting feature of the highest IQ girls in my class, including the very beautiful one. They were NOT PC and complained bitterly about harrasment by blacks at certain events. One was an aspiring singer, and while trying to perform at the Flower Mart, the whole affair was ruined by marauding blacks, who trashed that innocent annual arts fair several years in row, for no apparent reason. The PC qualities of the young in the last decades of the 20th c., have been grossly overstated. Most of those not from "Whitopias" knew better.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. @Anon
    "Its a long-standing Chinese tradition to respect the meritocracy of the examination system, to be honest. I will stand that we would probably be fine with any minority that does well in the gaokao – and indeed, minorities actually do get affirmative action to help them."

    Meritocracy is all very well and good, but Chinese wasted the principle by selecting for talents that turned out to be useless. Yes, one can have a meritocratic system on who can write fancy calligraphy on an eight-legged essay, but what will such talent do for the nation?

    Suppose we select for elites in a nation purely on a meritocratic basis but the test involves chess and scrabble. Okay, it will select the smarter people to be sure, but in the service of what? Useless knowledge.

    So, meritocracy isn't enough. It is relevancy of what is tested for merit. Otherwise, it turns into meretriciocracy.

    In hard sciences, meritocracy works fine in the West. But when it comes to social sciences, we have so much uselessness because PC forbids honest discussion. So, even as social sciences do select for ability and intelligence, the talent is really for the ability to lie, spin, and obfuscate than to explore and investigate honestly.

    Meretriciocracy is the challenge of bureaucracies around the world, and as we can see, has now been proven to afflict us from over two thousand years. The eight-legged essay was probably not the best metric, but was hereditary influence much better?

    These days, we use other metrics but all too often, we’re basically selecting for the ability to lie most efficiently.

    What do you think is the better idea?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. @Oldvannes
    China has 1.2 billion people and fewer than 1500 naturalized non Chinese citizens.

    Non Han indigenous groups are not outsiders.

    The reason the Chinese, Koreans, Japanese etc have no overtly nationalist parties is because they have no large outside non indigenous groups to deal with. Nor, after watching the West implode, will they ever put their societies in such a position.

    Well, they were once outsiders too. We just have more assimilated them. As for the West, the glory of the West is that their strong ideas can often forge them ahead to great new heights and the failure of the West is that their strong ideas seem to drive them to suicidal excesses, too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier
    Interesting idea.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. @Corvinus
    "are jews subject to the charge of xenophobic, or racist, or any of the current words that are defined as bigotry?"

    EVERY group is subject to being called a racist. Just don't expect that group to take those accusations kindly or to heart.

    Now, are Jews compared to any other group more racist? If yes, in what ways?

    "liberals are bigots."

    No, only those liberals who meet the criteria of bigotry. The statement you made is a generalization. Now, are conservatives other than bigots? If yes, in what ways?

    EVERY group is subject to being called a racist.

    Hmm. I don’t think so; not in the sense you presented it here. An institution, ideology (‘liberalism’, for example), or practice can be racist. But calling an ethnic group composed of individuals of a variety of ideologies, mindsets, and all different walks of life ‘racist’ makes no sense at all, imo.

    In fact, what you’re doing here is introducing a negative ethnic stereotype, which itself is rather problematic…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "But calling an ethnic group composed of individuals of a variety of ideologies, mindsets, and all different walks of life ‘racist’ makes no sense at all, imo."

    I never said "ethnic group". I clearly stated "group". Read carefully next time.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. anarchyst says:
    @Anon
    And the vast majority of Swedish media that pushes this rampant strain of PC is owned by Jews. The Swedes didn't push it on themselves.

    Jews are where the conversation about the West's downfall begins and ends. If anyone tries to tell you otherwise they a) aren't informed, or b) are running cover.

    Look up “Barbara Lerner Spectre” to see what the “chosen” have in store for all of us whites…

    Read More
    • Replies: @rw95
    Yes, because that one quote by one Jewish lady that is constantly spammed by the alt-right proves the Jewish conspiracy against whites...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. anarchyst says:
    @Anon
    "Billy Joels of the world prefer Nordic Gentile blonde GFs, wives than Jewess wives. Few men of anything ethnic, cultural, religious backgrounds want to date or marry the likes of Elena Kagan or Ruth Bader Ginzberg. How many Jewish husbands did Christie Brinkley have?"

    There is certainly the Portnoy Complex, but most white women, even Nordic women, do NOT look like fashion models.

    Also, the kind of Jewesses that make it in intellectual sphere tend to be geekettes, but this is true of every group. Most brainy women of all races look rather plain or homely..

    White, Asian, Hispanic, Jewish, etc babes generally don't become successful in brainy fields.
    Remember Janet Reno?

    Was Janet Reno a woman or a man? (ugggh)…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Jake says:
    @Anon
    And the vast majority of Swedish media that pushes this rampant strain of PC is owned by Jews. The Swedes didn't push it on themselves.

    Jews are where the conversation about the West's downfall begins and ends. If anyone tries to tell you otherwise they a) aren't informed, or b) are running cover.

    The conversation about the West’s downfall begins with the Reformation and proceeds to the Enlightenment. Jews did not cause those things. Jews simply came out of each the biggest winner, because the white Christian West chose to rebel against itself.

    Every Jews in the ‘western’ would could be expelled today, and the suicide of the West would continue, perhaps even speeding up, if the West did not follow the path the Russians have recently begun: back to Christendom.

    It is either Christ or chaos. It is either Christendom or European cultures and genetics will be swamped by the Third World.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    good point. Still, the secularization seems to be just the way it is, as science and rationality explain just about everything. Thales, I think, the old Greek, stated that everything was a result of Natural causes, not the Gods, etc.

    Since all races are more or less susceptible to irrationality and are emotionally driven, not rationally driven when it comes to personal and inter-personal matters, that is the problem.

    Arguably Whites are less irrational, but the problem remains.

    The conservative virtues, family, etc. are psychologically ultra important. We are talking about the psyche here, not Shoulds, etc.

    Applying socio-biology to the matter, the ancient virtues are correct. Reading The Ancient City by Coulanges, and I will report more as I get into the book, he discusses Greek and Roman prehistory and what we know ( he was writing mid-19th C.) about the ancient family.

    The father carried the generational. It was thought that only the male carried the seed, that it was planted in the female, but all of the inheritance was the result of the Father. Hence the lower rank of female and mother, etc. Ancestors were all important, and the Family included all the essentially male dead of the past. The family shrine had to be carefully attended, including the family tomb, which was located nearby. The ancient religion was the religion of the Family and did not include society. This is all completely compassed by socio-biology today.

    Psychologically, we are no different now than a few thousand years ago. Probably.

    Cosmopolitan modern White society is more or less totally cut off from Family, Father, Ancestors.

    Roots are gone or are crawling around looking for themselves in all the wrong places. Etc.

    The radical individualism of our times is part of this. Hence, as the Family/Father principle that guides and restrains, is gone while the Mass cosmopolitanism beats at the doors of personal identity.

    Part of this Identity thru the Mass, not the Family/Father principle of Guidance and restraint, leads to lots of crazy ideas without links to bio-social reality. We think we are part of Humanity, and we are not so linked except in the very limited context of race.

    So we go to College and say goodbye to the Father, but not necessarily the Mother who is the guide to household/social amity. Mother is Private, and Father is Public in the limited sense, of guidance as to everything outside the home. Fundamentally, Father lays down the law, and the law is extreme awareness of the dangers of life outside the family. Mother just loves everybody, in principle, she is indiscriminate. Until her kids are endangered.

    Deprived of this Father/Conservative principle, the kids start to Luv Everybody, especially when the Mother principle carries no warnings about outsiders.

    The kids are untethered and Free of domination by the Father principle. In other words, they apply the Mother principle of loving everybody and here we are.

    In the old days of Rome, a father could kill his children. He could also adopt to assure that the Principle of Father was continued, setting aside consanguinity for the far more important principle of inter-generational Family...again, starting with ancestors.

    Without Family, we become mass: undifferentiated fools who will believe anything, especially if it feels good...Mother principle again. Love everybody. Father says basically, get ready to kill anybody outside the Family. Be careful.

    Liberals, commies, etc as the zombies looking for love anywhere they can get it.

    I have known a few guys who have lost their Father connection, but retained Mom. They are out of control.

    Father is the anchor, Mother is the tether to the anchor, which allows for a little freedom of movement, but keeps the orbit small. If you lose Mother, you will survive with some bumps, but if you lose Father, you are prey to any idiocy du jour.



    Joe Webb
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. Treg says:

    Besides the physical, what is whiteness?….. I’ve met physically white 20 year old females that were 100% “get to” or “hoodrat” or you might as well use the “n” word…and it’s all really “them”, not a putt on, not a fake. And the same for some physically black women I’ve met, they were 100% white, nothing about them was “black”…. and the same has been true of Asian and Latin men I’ve met, 100% white. White bread to the point that it’s you who scratches your head. …. so what is whiteness and isn’t that, specifically that, that the nonracist American longs to see more of? That’s a multi ethnic America, but so white? Sure maybe a touch of non whiteness here or there, for “flavor” like on 1964 star trek episode, but all so well, white. Liberal and white maybe… but not conservative ( of any color) and white.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  106. Svigor says:

    An endorsement of Israel by the Alt-Right is meant to link the two brands in the minds of the diverse horde.

    Two things wrong with this. First, the actual anti-sem right just doesn’t do this. They either don’t take sides or are actively pro-Arab.

    Perhaps not, but I certainly do this:

    Don’t think of Alt-Right praise of Israel and Zionism as trying to “cozy” up to the Tribe, or trying to “get them to go easy on us.”

    It’s a form of political judo. Philosemitic Nazis? That sound you hear is heads exploding.

    We just want to be more like the Jews, and follow their shining example.

    Second, there is no need to link Israel and “racist” white conservative parties “in the minds of the diverse horde” because that link is already there and completely solid.

    Jews seem to expend a great deal of energy reinforcing links that are already there and completely solid. I’ll follow their example.

    Really, I play both sides, donning and doffing my Devil’s Advocate (leftist voice) hat at will. Because it makes sense to critique phonies this way. On one hand, Jews are the leftist brain trust in the diaspora, and on the other, they have their Levantine Reich. And contrary to what a naive sap might expect, these two groups overlap, and are BFFs.

    “This apparent oddity flows from the movement’s paramount goal: preserving United States as a white ethno state, a nation with shared heritage, a single language and common biological ancestry.”

    Except from its inception the United States was not a white ethno state–it was a mix of various European ethnic groups along with Native American and imported Africans.

    So? Israel from its inception was not a Jewish ethno-state – it was a mix of various Jewish ethnic groups along with native Arab and other groups.

    Yet it still has as its paramount goal the preservation of Israel as a Jewish ethno-state. And they get help from millions of phony-leftist diaspora Jews.

    There are much assumptions

    Your usual facility with the language is on display (this one’s on your side, Shermy).

    Nope. That ship has sailed.

    The ship never sails on self-determination. It’s always there, waiting to be wielded.

    your bullet #2 is nonsense. Whatever political vacuum we fill in Washington, is not a vacuum created by us. We do manipulate it for our own benefit, but it was there to start with. We didn’t create a White Race that pays more attention to HighSchool Football Championships than to the amount of bullion backing the paper currency.

    You rely on ignorance and deceit. Never a good long-term policy. This is how Jews get themselves expelled like clockwork, throughout history.

    “I would not judge wanting to be among whites and celebrating “white” culture xenophobic. That word is a slur.”

    Would it be called a slur to label whites who exercise their liberty to marry and procreate with non-whites as being “bad whites”?

    Here you go with this again. Slurring whites who exercise their liberty to marry and procreate only with whites (unless both parties are Jewish, of course) is the reigning order. It’s blared from every minaret 5 times a day. But you are only concerned with the slurring that goes in the other direction, the resistance to The Man, coming from a tiny minorit. You’re like some weird Goldman-Sacks troll, or Soros troll, who doesn’t even bother to hide his loyalty to the globalist oligarch order.

    When European colonizers came knocking on their door via colonization and imperialism, their policies interrupted and interfered with potential advancements suited for their own environment made for and by Asians and Africans. Invade the world, invite the world indeed.

    Sort of like when your Mandarins, the Jews, came knocking on the Palestinians’ door.

    are jews subject to the charge of xenophobic, or racist, or any of the current words that are defined as bigotry?

    EVERY group is subject to being called a racist. Just don’t expect that group to take those accusations kindly or to heart.

    “Sure,” said Corvy. “Just never expect to hear those accusations coming from me. Europeans are so tolerant, their nations are slipping away; which is why I spend all my accusations-of-racism time on Europeans. Jews have a colonialist ethno-state going right now, which is why I never criticize Jews for their colonialism or ethnocentrism.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  107. @ThereisaGod
    The globalist oligarchy opposes and (successfully) forbids whites collectively defending their interests. How can one explain this?
    The most obvious one is that Jews (VERY committed to their own ethnic interests) have taken over leadership of the western world from whites and are determined to eliminate their major competitor for once and for all ... via these kind of cultural mind wars. Oh, and by engineered mass immigration of Africans and Arabs into all (of what were once understood to be) white societies.

    Anyone got a better explanation?

    The only other possible explanation, as I see it, is that the invisible "oligarchy" driving global events are not primarily Jewish [they are certainly not ENTIRELY Jewish] but rather (for want of a better word) Satanists who, by definition, are entirely devoted to self-interest and who consider ordinary folk to be, at best, slaves and, at worst, an enemy to be systematically enslaved or destroyed. These Satanists, being very cunning, USE 'The Jewish People'. They hide behind their amplified victimhood and use Jews, whenever possible, to front their criminal projects (in business, banking and government) in the public domain. So that if we turn on our masters we will attack only Jews and the entirely innocent ones (NEARLY ALL Jews who are merely brainwashed muppets like ourselves)

    Either way, the issue of who are are our warmongering diabolical rulers cannot be addressed without addressing this Jewish question. If Jews genuinely turn against their own leadership as Christ commanded them ... we will all be saved. Without this collective Jewish change of heart it is hard to see anything but disaster on the horizon. One way or another.

    Jews need to ask themselves.
    This 'Equality', 'Liberal', 'anti-Racist' agenda to which we are all committed ... are we committed because we LOVE ALL THE HUMAN RACE and will defend and protect universal rights? Or are we committed because we want to live in a society dominated by the globalist international bankers driving this Imperialist agenda.
    Do we REALLY love our neighbours or do we love the tyranny this hijacking of human moral conscience is actually manufacturing.
    Because it is "OUR" tyranny?
    The intention at the bottom (in Communist societies) can be sincere (if stupid). The intention at the top is always TOTALLY INSINCERE. The people at the top do not care about "equality" AT ALL!
    AT ALL!
    And sincerity (regarding spirituality and, please reflect on it, our eternal destiny) is everything.

    Better explanations:

    The left’s shift to identity politics are allowed for an alliance between the liberal right and left with the aim of destroying populists, nationalists, traditionalists and old-school leftists who are opposed to economic and cultural globalisation

    Increasing urbanisation over the last century has had a liberalising effect on whites (most liberal whites live in big cities and most conservative whites live in small cities and towns and guess which side has the microphone).

    After the bloody anti-communism wars of the 50s and 60s, western elites decided to fight communism and promote capitalism by promoting free trade and open borders, rather than by direct military intervention.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. Svigor says:

    I understand why some Alt-Righters would think of cultmarx Jews as a bigger danger than Zionists

    I think of the lot of them as cultmarx Zionist Jews.

    Weissberg is a professor and he misuses “adverse” and misspells “miniscule”?

    Miniscule or Minuscule

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  109. Svigor says:

    From the article linked above:

    The current media story line is that the Spanish, in a fit of blind religious fanaticism, cut off their noses to spite their faces by kicking out the clever and enterprising Jewish community. Having heard these tearful tales over and over again, history buffs could be forgiven for thinking that only mass insanity could have led Spaniards to commit such an enormous gaffe.

    This is the default explanation for everything, from the Jewish Narrativists. It’s misanthropic, but hating (almost) all of humanity, Jews’ eternal sin, isn’t a sin any more; only hating part of humanity (racism) is a sin any more (this is the kind of morality you get when you let Jews run your culture).

    It’s lazy, and stupid, but it’s convenient for Jews, because crazy people will do anything, for no reason at all. So Jews can cook up as implausible and stupid a version of history as they like, and explain it all as the work of crazy people.

    Per usual, when it comes to Jews, the story they tell is, shall we say, at variance with the facts. Fourteen hundred and ninety-two was the year Spanish civilization took off like a rocket. Within a century or two, Cervantes was writing Don Quixote; Velasquez was painting his incomparable portraits; Calderon was writing his brilliant plays. It almost seemed as if the presence of the Jews had kept Spanish culture under wraps and their forced removal unloosed tremendous bursts of artistic, literary and economic energy. (Might it be possible that the same unshackling of cultural forces would produce similar results if the Jews left the U. S.?)

    Something similar happened in England, when they kicked the Jews out.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    The Normans, who at the time were 100% Francophone and decidedly anti-Anglo-Saxon in cultural terms, expelled Jews from the parts of Britain they ruled. When Cromwell grabbed absolute power, he made deals to bring Jews back into England. In fact, Cromwell, whose heretical theology was behind the decision at least as much as Jewish money, gave Jews rights and privileges denied to not merely Catholics but also most Protestants.

    Germanic culture and language brought into rebellion against historic Christendom guarantees cultural philosemitism. And that leads to disaster for both white Gentiles and, eventually, for Jews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. Keith Vaz says:

    OfC it is to a Weissberg.

    Not to me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  111. rw95 says:
    @anarchyst
    Look up "Barbara Lerner Spectre" to see what the "chosen" have in store for all of us whites...

    Yes, because that one quote by one Jewish lady that is constantly spammed by the alt-right proves the Jewish conspiracy against whites…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. Art says:
    @Sherman
    Hey Genius,

    "Then that" should be "than that".

    It's no wonder Jews are so powerful.

    Their enemies are so stupid.

    Peace,

    Sherm

    “Then that” should be “than that”.

    It’s no wonder Jews are so powerful.

    Their enemies are so stupid.

    Hey Sherm,

    Talk about dumb – the FBI actually found the bomb caller to the Jew centers before the ADL/Mossad did. (Saved his life.)

    He is an alt-left fake news reject from the Jew MSM. Just like everyone thought, one of your guys did it.

    To funny!

    Peace — Art

    p.s. Moshe asks me to do the writing errors – he gets a kick out of you making a fool of yourself.

    p.s. If you Jews are so smart – why are you more disliked today then yesterday?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sherman
    Hey Genius,

    "To funny" should be "too funny".

    You're even dumber than I give you credit for.

    Peace,
    Sherm

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. Jake says:
    @Svigor
    From the article linked above:

    The current media story line is that the Spanish, in a fit of blind religious fanaticism, cut off their noses to spite their faces by kicking out the clever and enterprising Jewish community. Having heard these tearful tales over and over again, history buffs could be forgiven for thinking that only mass insanity could have led Spaniards to commit such an enormous gaffe.
     
    This is the default explanation for everything, from the Jewish Narrativists. It's misanthropic, but hating (almost) all of humanity, Jews' eternal sin, isn't a sin any more; only hating part of humanity (racism) is a sin any more (this is the kind of morality you get when you let Jews run your culture).

    It's lazy, and stupid, but it's convenient for Jews, because crazy people will do anything, for no reason at all. So Jews can cook up as implausible and stupid a version of history as they like, and explain it all as the work of crazy people.

    Per usual, when it comes to Jews, the story they tell is, shall we say, at variance with the facts. Fourteen hundred and ninety-two was the year Spanish civilization took off like a rocket. Within a century or two, Cervantes was writing Don Quixote; Velasquez was painting his incomparable portraits; Calderon was writing his brilliant plays. It almost seemed as if the presence of the Jews had kept Spanish culture under wraps and their forced removal unloosed tremendous bursts of artistic, literary and economic energy. (Might it be possible that the same unshackling of cultural forces would produce similar results if the Jews left the U. S.?)
     
    Something similar happened in England, when they kicked the Jews out.

    The Normans, who at the time were 100% Francophone and decidedly anti-Anglo-Saxon in cultural terms, expelled Jews from the parts of Britain they ruled. When Cromwell grabbed absolute power, he made deals to bring Jews back into England. In fact, Cromwell, whose heretical theology was behind the decision at least as much as Jewish money, gave Jews rights and privileges denied to not merely Catholics but also most Protestants.

    Germanic culture and language brought into rebellion against historic Christendom guarantees cultural philosemitism. And that leads to disaster for both white Gentiles and, eventually, for Jews.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Diversity Heretic
    I thought that the expulsion of the Jews from England was during the reign of King Edward I (1239-1307), generally regarded as one of the strongest and most effective kings of England. The Norman Conquest occurred in 1066, almost two hundred years earlier.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. @Anon
    And the vast majority of Swedish media that pushes this rampant strain of PC is owned by Jews. The Swedes didn't push it on themselves.

    Jews are where the conversation about the West's downfall begins and ends. If anyone tries to tell you otherwise they a) aren't informed, or b) are running cover.

    Virtually all Swedish media, including state owned television, pushes this.

    Name the Swedish media that “are owned by Jews.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @benjaminl
    Well... looks like it's not zero at least...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonnier_family
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dagens_Nyheter

    https://redice.tv/news/how-and-why-sweden-became-multicultural
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. Corvinus says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    EVERY group is subject to being called a racist.
     
    Hmm. I don't think so; not in the sense you presented it here. An institution, ideology ('liberalism', for example), or practice can be racist. But calling an ethnic group composed of individuals of a variety of ideologies, mindsets, and all different walks of life 'racist' makes no sense at all, imo.

    In fact, what you're doing here is introducing a negative ethnic stereotype, which itself is rather problematic...

    “But calling an ethnic group composed of individuals of a variety of ideologies, mindsets, and all different walks of life ‘racist’ makes no sense at all, imo.”

    I never said “ethnic group”. I clearly stated “group”. Read carefully next time.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    Read carefully next time.
     
    Heh. This sounds familiar - are you a liberal? Yeah, being an asshole unable to communicate with people is the most common liberal trait; thanks for reminding me.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. benjaminl says:
    @PV van der Byl
    Virtually all Swedish media, including state owned television, pushes this.

    Name the Swedish media that "are owned by Jews."
    Read More
    • Replies: @PV van der Byl
    You are brilliant benjaminl! You point to a family with fractional Jewish ancestry over a century ago. None of whom practice Judaism today and whose ranks include a Bishop of the Swedish National (Lutheran) Church.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. @benjaminl
    Well... looks like it's not zero at least...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonnier_family
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dagens_Nyheter

    https://redice.tv/news/how-and-why-sweden-became-multicultural

    You are brilliant benjaminl! You point to a family with fractional Jewish ancestry over a century ago. None of whom practice Judaism today and whose ranks include a Bishop of the Swedish National (Lutheran) Church.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. anon says: • Disclaimer

    The alt-right is threatening because the emperor has no clothes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  119. dcite says:
    @Anon
    "Billy Joels of the world prefer Nordic Gentile blonde GFs, wives than Jewess wives. Few men of anything ethnic, cultural, religious backgrounds want to date or marry the likes of Elena Kagan or Ruth Bader Ginzberg. How many Jewish husbands did Christie Brinkley have?"

    There is certainly the Portnoy Complex, but most white women, even Nordic women, do NOT look like fashion models.

    Also, the kind of Jewesses that make it in intellectual sphere tend to be geekettes, but this is true of every group. Most brainy women of all races look rather plain or homely..

    White, Asian, Hispanic, Jewish, etc babes generally don't become successful in brainy fields.
    Remember Janet Reno?

    Most brainy women of all races look rather plain or homely..

    Most people of any IQ, are average looking, because most of us don’t live in Lake Wobegone where all children are above average. Still, there were studies showing that higher intelligence is associated in both sexes with better physical development and better looks. I know of a fair number of women scientists at the local space agency who are gorgeous. While personal anecdotes are not proof to any except oneself, two very beautiful girls in my senior class, scored highest in IQ, upper 1% in the world, overall. A 16 year old beauty I once worked with (who married an 18 year old husband and is still married to him decades later) was VP of a major bank by the time she was in her 20s. She graduated high school early and did college while working a real job. Seen this sort of thing enough to have a tendency to associate exceptional beauty in women with great brains and success, unless they choose to just “use” the looks and then they seem dumber than dirt. Depends.

    Interesting feature of the highest IQ girls in my class, including the very beautiful one. They were NOT PC and complained bitterly about harrasment by blacks at certain events. One was an aspiring singer, and while trying to perform at the Flower Mart, the whole affair was ruined by marauding blacks, who trashed that innocent annual arts fair several years in row, for no apparent reason. The PC qualities of the young in the last decades of the 20th c., have been grossly overstated. Most of those not from “Whitopias” knew better.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. Sherman says:
    @Art

    “Then that” should be “than that”.

    It’s no wonder Jews are so powerful.

    Their enemies are so stupid.
     
    Hey Sherm,

    Talk about dumb – the FBI actually found the bomb caller to the Jew centers before the ADL/Mossad did. (Saved his life.)

    He is an alt-left fake news reject from the Jew MSM. Just like everyone thought, one of your guys did it.

    To funny!

    Peace --- Art

    p.s. Moshe asks me to do the writing errors – he gets a kick out of you making a fool of yourself.

    p.s. If you Jews are so smart – why are you more disliked today then yesterday?

    Hey Genius,

    “To funny” should be “too funny”.

    You’re even dumber than I give you credit for.

    Peace,
    Sherm

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art

    “To funny” should be “too funny”.

    You’re even dumber than I give you credit for.
     

    Hi Sherm,

    How true, my writing skills are meager. I know when iffen calls me an 88 - that he is snickering - he thinks that 88 is my IQ. (I fear he gives me to much credit.)

    But then - who is better off - someone who is not so bright but tells the truth, or someone who is bright, but bases his whole existence on a packet of untruths?

    Peace --- Art

    , @Karl
    120 Sherm >Hey Genius,
    >
    >“To funny” should be “too funny”.


    Karl's Razor: do not blame on "poor grammar", that which is more likely to be "poor typing"
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. Gene Su says:

    I want to split my response to this article in two parts:

    New York City where I live is a hotbed of racial liberalism and exalts racial and ethnic diversity, but a visiting Martian would conclude that Jim Crow laws were still on the books. Overwhelmingly, both private and public schools are highly segregated and, in fact, city public school administrators recently tried to enroll white children from affluent white families in the city’s über liberal West Side into a more “diverse” and less crowded nearby school.

    Dr. Weissburg is only half correct. I have lived in New York City for four years. I wasn’t surprised to hear on the radio that it was the most segregated city in America, especially in its school system. When I attended an elite private engineering school, I was only slightly shocked to hear my classmates making disparaging remarks about blacks. The elite high schools (Stuyvesant, Bronx-Science) have a far lower percentage of blacks than their residential ratio in the city.

    Having said that, I also wish to state that the rulers of New York do comparatively little to enrage blacks. In fact, they go out of their way to appease blacks. Let me recount a story. When I worked part-time in the college doing some menial tasks for the audio-visual people, there was a black tech who never showed up on time and never did what he was told. The manager wanted to fire him, but the tech sued him for racism. The manager tried to defend himself by asserting … get this … that he was black himself. Strangely, the judge would not hear of it. You see, the manager was a Jamaican and not “authentically black” or native born. The judge sided with the tech and the manager had to fork over a few thousand dollars. Only in liberal New York … It’s easier to just appease people with money then to hold them responsible.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Days of Broken Arrows
    Your example of the black tech is similar to something I witnessed at the Maryland college I attended. We had a woman in administration who was never at her post and wouldn't speak to whites except for one-word answers. Even the most liberal university officials openly said she was a product of Affirmative-Action and they couldn't fire her "because she says she'll pick up the phone and call her lawyers."

    So, I wonder if your assertion that it happens "only in liberal New York" needs to be broadened a bit.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. Gene Su says:

    Here is part 2 of my reaction to this article (and many other similar articles on the Unz review). Warning: long post follows.

    I think someone needs to write an article on *why* so many whites are fooled into believing that there is no black underclass problem and that the Alt-Right’s rantings are completely untrue. Conservatives harp about how the media has painted a rosy picture of blacks but that is a minor factor. I have written this argument on the blog posts for Dr. Gottfried’s recent article and will probably write this more times in the future.

    Most whites have *zero* contact with underclass blacks. This is especially true during their adolescent years. Most non-whites do not attend public schools that are majority black. A white child is more likely to encounter a white thug in elementary school than a black thug.

    No, seriously, think about it! If you go to a public school that is 99% white, chances are that all of the delinquents and trouble makers you meet are white. Amren likes to publish lots of nasty incidents involving black punks. So? There are plenty of incidents with white punks. I have seen white boys and white girls violently beating one another. I have had rocks thrown at me by white a-holes. I have had my stuff stolen by white thugs. I once violently beat the crap out of a white kid who threw a rock at me in summer camp and the counselor care-taker (who I admit was black) tried to protect him. Nicholas Stix once griped about how black adults (especially women) would try to protect black thugs. So? There were innumerable times when I was told by white teachers and caretakers that I better ignore my tormenters and turn the other cheek. It is very difficult to expel or discpline a white troublemaker in a suburban school.

    This has nothing to do with racism. The problem is that there is a massive decline in disciplinary standards in our public schools. A child also has far less freedom and options today to avoid punks and thugs. When you have a bloated bureaucracy like in many public schools, you’re going to have some adult care-takers who might not be morally responsible.

    A child who constantly is subjected to this might conclude that the white society from which these trouble makers come from is rotten to the core and has nothing to offer. Note that I am trying to point out the disconnect between what most people witness in their formative years and what the overall reality is. Unless you have access to crime statistics like Steve Sailer and Jared Taylor, you would not know that the black underclass is disproportionately responsible for most violent crime in America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
    I have some breaking news for you:

    The vast majority of intelligent, well-read Whites are NOT "fooled into believing that there is no black underclass problem and that the Alt-Right’s rantings are completely untrue".

    On the contrary, the vast majority of (intelligent, well-read) Whites know perfectly well that the essence of what the Alt-Right stands for - full White ethnic seperation and self-rule in their OWN homelands, the exclusion of all lawless, illiterate, wholly unskilled and useless third-world non-White immigrants (and all of their dissatisfied, rootless, self-hating, crime-prone offpring) from White society, and an end to unopposed, mass displacement-level immigration - most of it Moslem - into traditionally White Christian homelands of Europe and America, is completely empirically necessary, both economically and socially. As a measure of White societal re-birth, rejuvenation, strengthening and solidification, it is also undeniable, morally truthful, politically far-seeing, and ultimately unavoidable - if we are to avoid the fast-growing, anti-White racist criminal Black underclass turning its hatred for all things Whitey into full-scale race war.

    If we fail to do this, we will fail also to protect our historic heritage, history, culture, language, religion, and traditional White way of life - not just for ourselves, but even more critically, for our children - and all of their children after them. Once the White world - and all it's varied catalogue of millennial achievements in art, science, medicine, historical research, democracy and the march of civilisation is gone, it is GONE for ever. This hard, unchanging Reality frightens and terrifies most White people a thousand times more than the occasional random excesses of a sometimes over-zealous Alt-Right movement.

    For your homework, please research the entirely different question of WHY, PRECISELY, knowing and sensing all of this, the vast majority of White people are going silently and obediently to their death and destruction under the control of the Overlords who rule our mass media, our political institutions, print our newspapers, run our schools, propagandize every moment's output of television, cinema, fashion and the social science curriculum, and tirelessly re-write the history books to remove the evidences of their own ongoing, utterly ruthless, millennial, dark ages evil.

    Better still, before you do that, find out just exactly WHO those Overlords are. If that is granted, all else follows.
    , @martin2
    I agree with you. Because white people interact on a daily basis mainly with other white people, any bad experiences to be had are almost certainly going to be involving other white people. I wrote about this many years ago elsewhere when a hard up white lady of my acquaintance was ripped off for a thousand pounds by a white plumber. I asked at the time: how are we supposed to feel any affinity with HIM just because he is white? These types of experiences are more likely to induce visceral hate.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. @Gene Su
    I want to split my response to this article in two parts:

    New York City where I live is a hotbed of racial liberalism and exalts racial and ethnic diversity, but a visiting Martian would conclude that Jim Crow laws were still on the books. Overwhelmingly, both private and public schools are highly segregated and, in fact, city public school administrators recently tried to enroll white children from affluent white families in the city’s über liberal West Side into a more “diverse” and less crowded nearby school.
     
    Dr. Weissburg is only half correct. I have lived in New York City for four years. I wasn't surprised to hear on the radio that it was the most segregated city in America, especially in its school system. When I attended an elite private engineering school, I was only slightly shocked to hear my classmates making disparaging remarks about blacks. The elite high schools (Stuyvesant, Bronx-Science) have a far lower percentage of blacks than their residential ratio in the city.

    Having said that, I also wish to state that the rulers of New York do comparatively little to enrage blacks. In fact, they go out of their way to appease blacks. Let me recount a story. When I worked part-time in the college doing some menial tasks for the audio-visual people, there was a black tech who never showed up on time and never did what he was told. The manager wanted to fire him, but the tech sued him for racism. The manager tried to defend himself by asserting ... get this ... that he was black himself. Strangely, the judge would not hear of it. You see, the manager was a Jamaican and not "authentically black" or native born. The judge sided with the tech and the manager had to fork over a few thousand dollars. Only in liberal New York ... It's easier to just appease people with money then to hold them responsible.

    Your example of the black tech is similar to something I witnessed at the Maryland college I attended. We had a woman in administration who was never at her post and wouldn’t speak to whites except for one-word answers. Even the most liberal university officials openly said she was a product of Affirmative-Action and they couldn’t fire her “because she says she’ll pick up the phone and call her lawyers.”

    So, I wonder if your assertion that it happens “only in liberal New York” needs to be broadened a bit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. pogohere says: • Website
    @Robert Magill
    Actually the first non-native inhabitants of what became America were black Africans. Seventy nine years before the Jamestown Colony was attempted a Spanish colony in the Carolinas was abandoned but not before many African slaves had escaped. They went to live with the Indian tribes in the region and constitute the first non-aboriginal people to inhabit America.
    http://robertmagill.wordpress.com

    More likely the first non-native inhabitants of the east coast of what became America trace back to at least as early as Erik the Red and his son Lief Eriksson, when the latter pursued the story told him by one Bjarni Herjolsson who claimed to have been blown off course while sailing from Iceland to Greenland in 986 CE. See G. Thompson’s Victorious!, Queen’s Champion–Prince Henry Sinclair, 2015, Misty Isles Press, Seattle, Internet Distributor: Lulu.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. pogohere says: • Website
    @jack ryan
    Politics certainly makes for strange bedfellows. The American Lib Left Democrat elites are now losing their collective minds hating on all things Trump and hating Trump supporters (poor and working class White Americans, White Southerners, The Russians, Alt Right activists who don't hate their own people and who correctly want peace with Russia and all remaining still majority White European nations and who also opposed the Neo Conservative intrigues and counter productive wars in the Middle East)

    So it's a weird reality that the very Jewish dominated Liberal Left media, or just the MSM - Mainstream Media - hates Trump and thus takes the side of Muslim migrants, tries to deny Muslim atrocities in Europe or just the 1 million plus Muslim male migrants that invaded Western Europe in 2016.

    It's a weird reality that American Lib Left Jews and also yeah Neo Conservatives Jews like William Kristol, David Frum, Elliot Abrams etc are on the same side of 1 billion plus world Muslims in everything that counts except Israel vs the Palestinians.

    Why? -The Muslims and Jews both hate or fear White Europeans, White European Americans - a lot of this is envy (Jewish women who are piss*** that Billy Joels of the world prefer Nordic Gentile blonde GFs, wives than Jewess wives. Few men of anything ethnic, cultural, religious backgrounds want to date or marry the likes of Elena Kagan or Ruth Bader Ginzberg. How many Jewish husbands did Christie Brinkley have?

    This weird Jewish Muslim alliance against Whites isn't anything new. Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492 or put under the Inquisition in large part for taking the Muslim side against Spanish Catholics Whites, for being Muslim tax collectors, for trafficking White girls to Muslim buyers.

    Here's the best history lesson of Whites (Catholics) Muslim Moors and the Jews in between in 15th Century Spain.

    This sh*** is happening now here in North America plus we had all kinds of weird other players like Social Justice Warriors pretending to be Black or Native American Indian (Sen. Elizabeth Warren)

    Spain 15th Century - Why the Jews were expelled Occidental Dissent

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2015/10/12/15th-century-spain-muslims-jews-and-our-guys/

    Yes, politics makes for strange bedfellows. The MSM, Neo Cons, Lib Left is spreading the meme that Trump and the Trump admin is in "Bed With the Russians"!

    I would love to be in bed with beautiful Russians like Miss Anna Kournikova and Maria Sharapova. Yeah I hear the rumors that both these Russian gals work for the KGB. If they interrogated me...

    I'd talk.

    :-)

    Re: “Spain 15th Century – Why the Jews were expelled Occidental Dissent”

    Reads a bit like this one:

    STALIN’S WILLING EXECUTIONERS

    JEWS AS A HOSTILE ELITE IN THE USSR

    The Jewish Century

    Yuri Slezkine

    Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004 $29.95 (cloth) x + 438 pages

    Reviewed by Kevin MacDonald

    A persistent theme among critics of Jews—particularly those on the pre-World War II right—has been that the Bolshevik revolution was a Jewish revolution and that the Soviet Union was dominated by Jews. This theme appears in a wide range of writings, from Henry Ford’s International Jew, to published statements by a long list of British, French, and American political figures in the 1920s (Winston Churchill, Woodrow Wilson, and David Lloyd George), and, in its most extreme form, by Adolf Hitler, who wrote:

    “Now begins the last great revolution. By wresting political power for himself, the Jew casts off the few remaining shreds of disguise he still wears. The democratic plebeian Jew turns into the blood Jew and the tyrant of peoples. In a few years he will try to exterminate the national pillars of intelligence and, by robbing the peoples of their natural spiritual leadership, will make them ripe for the slavish lot of a permanent subjugation. The most terrible example of this is Russia.”

    This long tradition stands in sharp contradiction to the official view, promulgated by Jewish organizations and almost all contemporary historians, that Jews played no special role in Bolshevism and indeed were specifically victimized by it. Yuri Slezkine’s book provides a much needed resolution to these opposing perspectives. It is an intellectual tour de force, alternately muddled and brilliant, courageous and apologetic.

    http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/slezkinerev.pdf

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    Yuri Slezkine’s book provides a much needed resolution to these opposing perspectives. It is an intellectual tour de force, alternately muddled and brilliant, courageous and apologetic.
     
    I'm not sure about that. I read it some years ago and would call it more intellectually dishonest (plenty of distortion through omission) and celebratory of some truly evil people.

    Just one example from my notes after reading it:

    The main body of the book deals with the Jewish experience in Russia, mostly after the 1917 Bolshevik revolution, and highlights the leading role of Jews in the revolution itself and in the top echelons of the Communist government. In fact they had an explicitly protected status until the final years of the Stalin dictatorship and the author shows that they were the most enthusiastic revolutionary activists.

    An evaluation of their "work" is missing from Slezkine's account, but it actually involved supervising the murder of the Russian royal family, arranging the liquidation or transportation to work/death camps of all educated Russians, the murder of 50% or more of national minorities and organizing the killing of 3 million+ Ukrainian farmers in the winter of 1932-1933. The latter atrocity was planned and executed by Lazar Kaganovich who astonishingly only gets a sympathetic page with regard to his childhood education. Furthermore, the slaughter of the Russian and Ukrainian Slavic population was accompanied by the establishment of a new Jewish "revolutionary" bourgeoise which the author documents in some detail as they enjoy their new country dachas, worship Pushkin and attend elite educational academies (the inspiration behind George Orwell's book, "Animal Farm: A Fairy Story".
    https://www.amazon.com/Animal-farm-Fairy-George-Orwell/dp/0451526341/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1488746139&sr=1-1&keywords=animal+farm%2C+orwell

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. @Corvinus
    "But calling an ethnic group composed of individuals of a variety of ideologies, mindsets, and all different walks of life ‘racist’ makes no sense at all, imo."

    I never said "ethnic group". I clearly stated "group". Read carefully next time.

    Read carefully next time.

    Heh. This sounds familiar – are you a liberal? Yeah, being an asshole unable to communicate with people is the most common liberal trait; thanks for reminding me.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Heh. This sounds familiar – are you a liberal?"

    No, just a white American man, married with children, who is able to make his own decisions about race and culture.
    , @Daniel Chieh
    The Corvinus being is a liberal troll.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. FBI’s Suspect for Anti-Semitic Threats: Bernie Voter, Fake News Reporter

    The Department of Justice unsealed a complaint against a journalist who made national headlines for fabricating stories after he allegedly conducted a campaign of harassment against at least eight Jewish community centers while cyberstalking his ex-girlfriend on Friday.

    The FBI arrested Juan Thompson in St. Louis on Friday, and he’s due to appear in court in Manhattan. Thompson’s arrest is the first since Jewish community centers and schools were targeted for threats and harassment across the country.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/03/fbis-suspect-for-anti-semitic-threats-bernie-voter-fake-news-reporter/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  128. @Jake
    The Normans, who at the time were 100% Francophone and decidedly anti-Anglo-Saxon in cultural terms, expelled Jews from the parts of Britain they ruled. When Cromwell grabbed absolute power, he made deals to bring Jews back into England. In fact, Cromwell, whose heretical theology was behind the decision at least as much as Jewish money, gave Jews rights and privileges denied to not merely Catholics but also most Protestants.

    Germanic culture and language brought into rebellion against historic Christendom guarantees cultural philosemitism. And that leads to disaster for both white Gentiles and, eventually, for Jews.

    I thought that the expulsion of the Jews from England was during the reign of King Edward I (1239-1307), generally regarded as one of the strongest and most effective kings of England. The Norman Conquest occurred in 1066, almost two hundred years earlier.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. @Oldvannes
    China has 1.2 billion people and fewer than 1500 naturalized non Chinese citizens.

    Non Han indigenous groups are not outsiders.

    The reason the Chinese, Koreans, Japanese etc have no overtly nationalist parties is because they have no large outside non indigenous groups to deal with. Nor, after watching the West implode, will they ever put their societies in such a position.

    Spot on, friend.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. @Gene Su
    Here is part 2 of my reaction to this article (and many other similar articles on the Unz review). Warning: long post follows.

    I think someone needs to write an article on *why* so many whites are fooled into believing that there is no black underclass problem and that the Alt-Right's rantings are completely untrue. Conservatives harp about how the media has painted a rosy picture of blacks but that is a minor factor. I have written this argument on the blog posts for Dr. Gottfried's recent article and will probably write this more times in the future.

    Most whites have *zero* contact with underclass blacks. This is especially true during their adolescent years. Most non-whites do not attend public schools that are majority black. A white child is more likely to encounter a white thug in elementary school than a black thug.

    No, seriously, think about it! If you go to a public school that is 99% white, chances are that all of the delinquents and trouble makers you meet are white. Amren likes to publish lots of nasty incidents involving black punks. So? There are plenty of incidents with white punks. I have seen white boys and white girls violently beating one another. I have had rocks thrown at me by white a-holes. I have had my stuff stolen by white thugs. I once violently beat the crap out of a white kid who threw a rock at me in summer camp and the counselor care-taker (who I admit was black) tried to protect him. Nicholas Stix once griped about how black adults (especially women) would try to protect black thugs. So? There were innumerable times when I was told by white teachers and caretakers that I better ignore my tormenters and turn the other cheek. It is very difficult to expel or discpline a white troublemaker in a suburban school.

    This has nothing to do with racism. The problem is that there is a massive decline in disciplinary standards in our public schools. A child also has far less freedom and options today to avoid punks and thugs. When you have a bloated bureaucracy like in many public schools, you're going to have some adult care-takers who might not be morally responsible.

    A child who constantly is subjected to this might conclude that the white society from which these trouble makers come from is rotten to the core and has nothing to offer. Note that I am trying to point out the disconnect between what most people witness in their formative years and what the overall reality is. Unless you have access to crime statistics like Steve Sailer and Jared Taylor, you would not know that the black underclass is disproportionately responsible for most violent crime in America.

    I have some breaking news for you:

    The vast majority of intelligent, well-read Whites are NOT “fooled into believing that there is no black underclass problem and that the Alt-Right’s rantings are completely untrue”.

    On the contrary, the vast majority of (intelligent, well-read) Whites know perfectly well that the essence of what the Alt-Right stands for – full White ethnic seperation and self-rule in their OWN homelands, the exclusion of all lawless, illiterate, wholly unskilled and useless third-world non-White immigrants (and all of their dissatisfied, rootless, self-hating, crime-prone offpring) from White society, and an end to unopposed, mass displacement-level immigration – most of it Moslem – into traditionally White Christian homelands of Europe and America, is completely empirically necessary, both economically and socially. As a measure of White societal re-birth, rejuvenation, strengthening and solidification, it is also undeniable, morally truthful, politically far-seeing, and ultimately unavoidable – if we are to avoid the fast-growing, anti-White racist criminal Black underclass turning its hatred for all things Whitey into full-scale race war.

    If we fail to do this, we will fail also to protect our historic heritage, history, culture, language, religion, and traditional White way of life – not just for ourselves, but even more critically, for our children – and all of their children after them. Once the White world – and all it’s varied catalogue of millennial achievements in art, science, medicine, historical research, democracy and the march of civilisation is gone, it is GONE for ever. This hard, unchanging Reality frightens and terrifies most White people a thousand times more than the occasional random excesses of a sometimes over-zealous Alt-Right movement.

    For your homework, please research the entirely different question of WHY, PRECISELY, knowing and sensing all of this, the vast majority of White people are going silently and obediently to their death and destruction under the control of the Overlords who rule our mass media, our political institutions, print our newspapers, run our schools, propagandize every moment’s output of television, cinema, fashion and the social science curriculum, and tirelessly re-write the history books to remove the evidences of their own ongoing, utterly ruthless, millennial, dark ages evil.

    Better still, before you do that, find out just exactly WHO those Overlords are. If that is granted, all else follows.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "On the contrary, the vast majority of (intelligent, well-read) Whites know perfectly well that the essence of what the Alt-Right stands for"

    So, who are these "intelligent, well-read" white people? Are they conservatives by trade? Exclusively other than Jewish? Generally southrons? Only WASPS?

    "full White ethnic seperation and self-rule in their OWN homelands"

    You are arguing from a false premise in that America was founded and developed exclusively by white Europeans. First, Europeans saw themselves as unique in and of themselves during the Age of Exploration. They did not "mix" with one another, except for the aristocrats in order to secure power and influence. Second, Africans were imported for labor, and tribal groups removed by force. Third, American whites today generally do not refer to themselves as being a English-American or a German-American or a white European, but an American who comes from one or more European backgrounds. Americans are racial and ethnic mutts.

    "the exclusion of all lawless, illiterate, wholly unskilled and useless third-world non-White immigrants (and all of their dissatisfied, rootless, self-hating, crime-prone offpring) from White society"

    Correct, but not lawful, literate, semi-skilled and useful third-world non-white immigrants to be excluded. Remember, nativists today who are opposed to certain immigrants employed the same arguments used by nativists in the 1840's and 1850's against the Germans and Irish, and in the 1890's and 1900's against the Italians and Poles--these white Europeans were considered to be other than white or less white, with degenerative blood and of questionable morality. The nativists did NOT see these groups as being white and a superior European, but as being other than white and an inferior European, utterly incapable of assimilating. Yet, these groups, along with the Assyrians and the Vietnamese, for example, have become integrated in our society.

    " and an end to unopposed, mass displacement-level immigration – most of it Moslem – into traditionally White Christian homelands of Europe and America..."

    You ought to study your history. Recall that Africans who were imported as slaves were Muslim and were forced to convert to Christianity. In his seminal Letter on Toleration (1689), John Locke insisted that Muslims and all others who believed in God be tolerated in England. Campaigning for religious freedom in Virginia, Thomasn Jefferson followed Locke in demanding recognition of the religious rights of the "Mahamdan," the Jew and the "pagan." Supporting Jefferson was his old ally, Richard Henry Lee, who had made a motion in Congress on June 7, 1776, that the American colonies declare independence. "True freedom," Lee asserted, "embraces the Mahomitan and the Gentoo (Hindu) as well as the Christian religion."

    Moreover, the Founding Fathers inserted an important component to the First Amendment--freedom of religion.

    "As a measure of White societal re-birth, rejuvenation, strengthening and solidification, it is also undeniable, morally truthful, politically far-seeing, and ultimately unavoidable – if we are to avoid the fast-growing, anti-White racist criminal Black underclass turning its hatred for all things Whitey into full-scale race war."

    First, must all whites believe in what you believe in? Why? Second, do whites have the liberty to make up their own mind when it comes to racial matters? Why? Third, how are you preparing for this inevitable, "full-scale race war"?

    "If we fail to do this, we will fail also to protect our historic heritage, history, culture, language, religion, and traditional White way of life – not just for ourselves, but even more critically, for our children – and all of their children after them."

    Should not we enable our children by their own volition to have friendships and relationships with non-whites? What makes YOU the exclusive arbiter as to how white men and women conduct their own personal affairs regarding race?

    "Once the White world – and all it’s varied catalogue of millennial achievements in art, science, medicine, historical research, democracy and the march of civilisation is gone, it is GONE for ever."

    Except white people have and will continue to achieve.

    "the vast majority of White people are going silently and obediently to their death and destruction under the control of the Overlords who rule our mass media, our political institutions, print our newspapers, run our schools, propagandize every moment’s output of television, cinema, fashion and the social science curriculum, and tirelessly re-write the history books to remove the evidences of their own ongoing, utterly ruthless, millennial, dark ages evil."

    Probably because they do not subscribe to your False News Stories and Alternative Facts. Again, must all white people submit to your position on race and culture?

    More importantly, if you are indeed so concerned about these Overlords, what are you physically doing to combat their evil manipulations? Please be detailed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. joe webb says:
    @Jake
    The conversation about the West's downfall begins with the Reformation and proceeds to the Enlightenment. Jews did not cause those things. Jews simply came out of each the biggest winner, because the white Christian West chose to rebel against itself.

    Every Jews in the 'western' would could be expelled today, and the suicide of the West would continue, perhaps even speeding up, if the West did not follow the path the Russians have recently begun: back to Christendom.

    It is either Christ or chaos. It is either Christendom or European cultures and genetics will be swamped by the Third World.

    good point. Still, the secularization seems to be just the way it is, as science and rationality explain just about everything. Thales, I think, the old Greek, stated that everything was a result of Natural causes, not the Gods, etc.

    Since all races are more or less susceptible to irrationality and are emotionally driven, not rationally driven when it comes to personal and inter-personal matters, that is the problem.

    Arguably Whites are less irrational, but the problem remains.

    The conservative virtues, family, etc. are psychologically ultra important. We are talking about the psyche here, not Shoulds, etc.

    Applying socio-biology to the matter, the ancient virtues are correct. Reading The Ancient City by Coulanges, and I will report more as I get into the book, he discusses Greek and Roman prehistory and what we know ( he was writing mid-19th C.) about the ancient family.

    The father carried the generational. It was thought that only the male carried the seed, that it was planted in the female, but all of the inheritance was the result of the Father. Hence the lower rank of female and mother, etc. Ancestors were all important, and the Family included all the essentially male dead of the past. The family shrine had to be carefully attended, including the family tomb, which was located nearby. The ancient religion was the religion of the Family and did not include society. This is all completely compassed by socio-biology today.

    Psychologically, we are no different now than a few thousand years ago. Probably.

    Cosmopolitan modern White society is more or less totally cut off from Family, Father, Ancestors.

    Roots are gone or are crawling around looking for themselves in all the wrong places. Etc.

    The radical individualism of our times is part of this. Hence, as the Family/Father principle that guides and restrains, is gone while the Mass cosmopolitanism beats at the doors of personal identity.

    Part of this Identity thru the Mass, not the Family/Father principle of Guidance and restraint, leads to lots of crazy ideas without links to bio-social reality. We think we are part of Humanity, and we are not so linked except in the very limited context of race.

    So we go to College and say goodbye to the Father, but not necessarily the Mother who is the guide to household/social amity. Mother is Private, and Father is Public in the limited sense, of guidance as to everything outside the home. Fundamentally, Father lays down the law, and the law is extreme awareness of the dangers of life outside the family. Mother just loves everybody, in principle, she is indiscriminate. Until her kids are endangered.

    Deprived of this Father/Conservative principle, the kids start to Luv Everybody, especially when the Mother principle carries no warnings about outsiders.

    The kids are untethered and Free of domination by the Father principle. In other words, they apply the Mother principle of loving everybody and here we are.

    In the old days of Rome, a father could kill his children. He could also adopt to assure that the Principle of Father was continued, setting aside consanguinity for the far more important principle of inter-generational Family…again, starting with ancestors.

    Without Family, we become mass: undifferentiated fools who will believe anything, especially if it feels good…Mother principle again. Love everybody. Father says basically, get ready to kill anybody outside the Family. Be careful.

    Liberals, commies, etc as the zombies looking for love anywhere they can get it.

    I have known a few guys who have lost their Father connection, but retained Mom. They are out of control.

    Father is the anchor, Mother is the tether to the anchor, which allows for a little freedom of movement, but keeps the orbit small. If you lose Mother, you will survive with some bumps, but if you lose Father, you are prey to any idiocy du jour.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. @A
    Great Article - but the real reason the (((media))) fears us is because we expose the jews.

    The JEWS who own the media, the JEWS who own the banks, the JEWS who own our politicians, the JEWS who are the most privileged and most wealthy people in America. The same jews who always bring up the imaginary holocaust, and the same jews who bring up antisemitism every time you tell the truth about Israel and how Israel continues to steal Palestenian land, jail Palestenians, torture Palestenians in jail and kill their people.

    It's not antisemitism if I'm speaking the truth. It's not antisemitism if we continue to expose the Jews sinister plan of killing our white brothers and sisters by importing muslims in Europe. Their plan is to destroy the white race which they hate more than anything.

    Word-perfect. Right on, friend.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. Corvinus says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    Read carefully next time.
     
    Heh. This sounds familiar - are you a liberal? Yeah, being an asshole unable to communicate with people is the most common liberal trait; thanks for reminding me.

    “Heh. This sounds familiar – are you a liberal?”

    No, just a white American man, married with children, who is able to make his own decisions about race and culture.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. Corvinus says:
    @Dave Bowman
    I have some breaking news for you:

    The vast majority of intelligent, well-read Whites are NOT "fooled into believing that there is no black underclass problem and that the Alt-Right’s rantings are completely untrue".

    On the contrary, the vast majority of (intelligent, well-read) Whites know perfectly well that the essence of what the Alt-Right stands for - full White ethnic seperation and self-rule in their OWN homelands, the exclusion of all lawless, illiterate, wholly unskilled and useless third-world non-White immigrants (and all of their dissatisfied, rootless, self-hating, crime-prone offpring) from White society, and an end to unopposed, mass displacement-level immigration - most of it Moslem - into traditionally White Christian homelands of Europe and America, is completely empirically necessary, both economically and socially. As a measure of White societal re-birth, rejuvenation, strengthening and solidification, it is also undeniable, morally truthful, politically far-seeing, and ultimately unavoidable - if we are to avoid the fast-growing, anti-White racist criminal Black underclass turning its hatred for all things Whitey into full-scale race war.

    If we fail to do this, we will fail also to protect our historic heritage, history, culture, language, religion, and traditional White way of life - not just for ourselves, but even more critically, for our children - and all of their children after them. Once the White world - and all it's varied catalogue of millennial achievements in art, science, medicine, historical research, democracy and the march of civilisation is gone, it is GONE for ever. This hard, unchanging Reality frightens and terrifies most White people a thousand times more than the occasional random excesses of a sometimes over-zealous Alt-Right movement.

    For your homework, please research the entirely different question of WHY, PRECISELY, knowing and sensing all of this, the vast majority of White people are going silently and obediently to their death and destruction under the control of the Overlords who rule our mass media, our political institutions, print our newspapers, run our schools, propagandize every moment's output of television, cinema, fashion and the social science curriculum, and tirelessly re-write the history books to remove the evidences of their own ongoing, utterly ruthless, millennial, dark ages evil.

    Better still, before you do that, find out just exactly WHO those Overlords are. If that is granted, all else follows.

    “On the contrary, the vast majority of (intelligent, well-read) Whites know perfectly well that the essence of what the Alt-Right stands for”

    So, who are these “intelligent, well-read” white people? Are they conservatives by trade? Exclusively other than Jewish? Generally southrons? Only WASPS?

    “full White ethnic seperation and self-rule in their OWN homelands”

    You are arguing from a false premise in that America was founded and developed exclusively by white Europeans. First, Europeans saw themselves as unique in and of themselves during the Age of Exploration. They did not “mix” with one another, except for the aristocrats in order to secure power and influence. Second, Africans were imported for labor, and tribal groups removed by force. Third, American whites today generally do not refer to themselves as being a English-American or a German-American or a white European, but an American who comes from one or more European backgrounds. Americans are racial and ethnic mutts.

    “the exclusion of all lawless, illiterate, wholly unskilled and useless third-world non-White immigrants (and all of their dissatisfied, rootless, self-hating, crime-prone offpring) from White society”

    Correct, but not lawful, literate, semi-skilled and useful third-world non-white immigrants to be excluded. Remember, nativists today who are opposed to certain immigrants employed the same arguments used by nativists in the 1840′s and 1850′s against the Germans and Irish, and in the 1890′s and 1900′s against the Italians and Poles–these white Europeans were considered to be other than white or less white, with degenerative blood and of questionable morality. The nativists did NOT see these groups as being white and a superior European, but as being other than white and an inferior European, utterly incapable of assimilating. Yet, these groups, along with the Assyrians and the Vietnamese, for example, have become integrated in our society.

    ” and an end to unopposed, mass displacement-level immigration – most of it Moslem – into traditionally White Christian homelands of Europe and America…”

    You ought to study your history. Recall that Africans who were imported as slaves were Muslim and were forced to convert to Christianity. In his seminal Letter on Toleration (1689), John Locke insisted that Muslims and all others who believed in God be tolerated in England. Campaigning for religious freedom in Virginia, Thomasn Jefferson followed Locke in demanding recognition of the religious rights of the “Mahamdan,” the Jew and the “pagan.” Supporting Jefferson was his old ally, Richard Henry Lee, who had made a motion in Congress on June 7, 1776, that the American colonies declare independence. “True freedom,” Lee asserted, “embraces the Mahomitan and the Gentoo (Hindu) as well as the Christian religion.”

    Moreover, the Founding Fathers inserted an important component to the First Amendment–freedom of religion.

    “As a measure of White societal re-birth, rejuvenation, strengthening and solidification, it is also undeniable, morally truthful, politically far-seeing, and ultimately unavoidable – if we are to avoid the fast-growing, anti-White racist criminal Black underclass turning its hatred for all things Whitey into full-scale race war.”

    First, must all whites believe in what you believe in? Why? Second, do whites have the liberty to make up their own mind when it comes to racial matters? Why? Third, how are you preparing for this inevitable, “full-scale race war”?

    “If we fail to do this, we will fail also to protect our historic heritage, history, culture, language, religion, and traditional White way of life – not just for ourselves, but even more critically, for our children – and all of their children after them.”

    Should not we enable our children by their own volition to have friendships and relationships with non-whites? What makes YOU the exclusive arbiter as to how white men and women conduct their own personal affairs regarding race?

    “Once the White world – and all it’s varied catalogue of millennial achievements in art, science, medicine, historical research, democracy and the march of civilisation is gone, it is GONE for ever.”

    Except white people have and will continue to achieve.

    “the vast majority of White people are going silently and obediently to their death and destruction under the control of the Overlords who rule our mass media, our political institutions, print our newspapers, run our schools, propagandize every moment’s output of television, cinema, fashion and the social science curriculum, and tirelessly re-write the history books to remove the evidences of their own ongoing, utterly ruthless, millennial, dark ages evil.”

    Probably because they do not subscribe to your False News Stories and Alternative Facts. Again, must all white people submit to your position on race and culture?

    More importantly, if you are indeed so concerned about these Overlords, what are you physically doing to combat their evil manipulations? Please be detailed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. joe webb says:
    @Corvinus
    "are jews subject to the charge of xenophobic, or racist, or any of the current words that are defined as bigotry?"

    EVERY group is subject to being called a racist. Just don't expect that group to take those accusations kindly or to heart.

    Now, are Jews compared to any other group more racist? If yes, in what ways?

    "liberals are bigots."

    No, only those liberals who meet the criteria of bigotry. The statement you made is a generalization. Now, are conservatives other than bigots? If yes, in what ways?

    using my old Webster’s definition of bigot, that it is someone intolerant of new information/ideas, and completely closed minded, and emotionally very reactive, etc. then conservatives too can be bigots.

    however, the conservative, holds on to old truths and prejudices, which are usually correct. Etc.

    The liberal commies, etc. are in total emotional reaction to the new old information on race, intelligence, and so on.

    They think Evolution stopped short of Equality, etc.

    So, my personal experience with conservatives in regard to race,jews, etc. when i was still a liberal of sorts, was that they were not bigoted in the above sense. They always treated me well.

    Liberals, etc today are besides themselves with fury. For example I was successfully flirting with a y
    young MD at the gym, but had stayed away for a year or so, cuz i though she was a jew. Since I was quitting cuz of the negroes, and other techies, and chinks…and stupid white bone-smashers, I decided to check this gal out and finally approached her.

    We were getting along famously, ( you know how the ladies can gush ) and as it turned out she was not a jew, but an Iranian, and we clicked on the Jewish Question, I mentioned that I was kinda conservative. End of Story. She went ballistic. Are you a Trump guy? Goodbye to rationality as the female, especially , psyche kicked it, even in a smart gal, again, MD. She said that she knew how I thought and felt.

    That is aggression. I told her that she did not know. I could have said that I knew how she felt and thought since I had been there as a lib-rad. I gave her the global north/south Ice Age and Out of Africa thing, She got it immediately, but then got even more nutty.

    So, liberals are bigots. Big Time. Conservatives can be so too, but in my experience are much less likely to be so.

    JW

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "using my old Webster’s definition of bigot, that it is someone intolerant of new information/ideas, and completely closed minded, and emotionally very reactive, etc. then conservatives too can be bigots."

    So far, so good.

    "however, the conservative, holds on to old truths and prejudices, which are usually correct. Etc."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ytCEuuW2_A

    You ASSUME that these "old truths and prejudices" are usually correct.

    "The liberal commies, etc. are in total emotional reaction to the new old information on race, intelligence, and so on."

    Here you assume, once gain, that liberals are commies, and commies are liberals. When you have this mentality, you will dismiss any information to the contrary. That makes substantive conversation difficult.

    "Liberals, etc today are besides themselves with fury. For example I was successfully flirting with a young MD at the gym, but had stayed away for a year or so, cuz i though she was a jew."

    So a potential mate whom you thought was Jewish, you refused to have a conservation with. That sounds reasonable (rolling of eyes).

    "Since I was quitting cuz of the negroes, and other techies, and chinks…and stupid white bone-smashers, I decided to check this gal out and finally approached her."

    So you quit a gym because of your own bigotry. That seems reasonable (rolling of eyes).

    "We were getting along famously, ( you know how the ladies can gush ) and as it turned out she was not a jew, but an Iranian, and we clicked on the Jewish Question, I mentioned that I was kinda conservative. End of Story. She went ballistic. Are you a Trump guy? Goodbye to rationality as the female, especially , psyche kicked it, even in a smart gal, again, MD. She said that she knew how I thought and felt."

    Irony escapes you. You were irrational when you refused to talk to her and quit the gym. You acted in EXACTLY the same way.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. Corvinus says:
    @joe webb
    using my old Webster's definition of bigot, that it is someone intolerant of new information/ideas, and completely closed minded, and emotionally very reactive, etc. then conservatives too can be bigots.

    however, the conservative, holds on to old truths and prejudices, which are usually correct. Etc.

    The liberal commies, etc. are in total emotional reaction to the new old information on race, intelligence, and so on.

    They think Evolution stopped short of Equality, etc.

    So, my personal experience with conservatives in regard to race,jews, etc. when i was still a liberal of sorts, was that they were not bigoted in the above sense. They always treated me well.

    Liberals, etc today are besides themselves with fury. For example I was successfully flirting with a y
    young MD at the gym, but had stayed away for a year or so, cuz i though she was a jew. Since I was quitting cuz of the negroes, and other techies, and chinks...and stupid white bone-smashers, I decided to check this gal out and finally approached her.

    We were getting along famously, ( you know how the ladies can gush ) and as it turned out she was not a jew, but an Iranian, and we clicked on the Jewish Question, I mentioned that I was kinda conservative. End of Story. She went ballistic. Are you a Trump guy? Goodbye to rationality as the female, especially , psyche kicked it, even in a smart gal, again, MD. She said that she knew how I thought and felt.

    That is aggression. I told her that she did not know. I could have said that I knew how she felt and thought since I had been there as a lib-rad. I gave her the global north/south Ice Age and Out of Africa thing, She got it immediately, but then got even more nutty.

    So, liberals are bigots. Big Time. Conservatives can be so too, but in my experience are much less likely to be so.

    JW

    “using my old Webster’s definition of bigot, that it is someone intolerant of new information/ideas, and completely closed minded, and emotionally very reactive, etc. then conservatives too can be bigots.”

    So far, so good.

    “however, the conservative, holds on to old truths and prejudices, which are usually correct. Etc.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ytCEuuW2_A

    You ASSUME that these “old truths and prejudices” are usually correct.

    “The liberal commies, etc. are in total emotional reaction to the new old information on race, intelligence, and so on.”

    Here you assume, once gain, that liberals are commies, and commies are liberals. When you have this mentality, you will dismiss any information to the contrary. That makes substantive conversation difficult.

    “Liberals, etc today are besides themselves with fury. For example I was successfully flirting with a young MD at the gym, but had stayed away for a year or so, cuz i though she was a jew.”

    So a potential mate whom you thought was Jewish, you refused to have a conservation with. That sounds reasonable (rolling of eyes).

    “Since I was quitting cuz of the negroes, and other techies, and chinks…and stupid white bone-smashers, I decided to check this gal out and finally approached her.”

    So you quit a gym because of your own bigotry. That seems reasonable (rolling of eyes).

    “We were getting along famously, ( you know how the ladies can gush ) and as it turned out she was not a jew, but an Iranian, and we clicked on the Jewish Question, I mentioned that I was kinda conservative. End of Story. She went ballistic. Are you a Trump guy? Goodbye to rationality as the female, especially , psyche kicked it, even in a smart gal, again, MD. She said that she knew how I thought and felt.”

    Irony escapes you. You were irrational when you refused to talk to her and quit the gym. You acted in EXACTLY the same way.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    the fundamental principle of sanity is don't do things that don't work for you .

    An Open Mind is an empty mind...an old line from a dead friend.

    One's mind is Open until one has filled it with argument and evidence. Sooner or later, you close y0ur mind to the same old nonsense.

    I did not refuse to talk to her, except on the jewish issue, which I have already covered. I have had several jewish girl friends, but now that I have become jew-wise, it just saves time, theirs and mine to forget about it....I remained courteous while she had lit the fuse to her abuse...she started making hostile remarks, like are you going to go home and watch Trump? etc. I let that go and kept smiling.

    Maybe I did not make clear that there were two interactions separated by a couple days. I went back the second time to see if she had sobered up a bit. She hadn't. After she insulted me again, I wished her good luck, and that was it.

    So, Corvinus, you must be real young. You don't see the logic in leaving certain people alone...when they crap on you. Jews, Negroes, chinks, etc. have all had their probationary periods with me. They have failed to make the cut. Also quite a few White Nationalists have failed as well.

    Grow up there Corvinas, it saves time. Close your mind to proven fools. and get on down the road of counter-revolution. Others Out, including your own genome.
    JW
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. Art says:
    @Sherman
    Hey Genius,

    "To funny" should be "too funny".

    You're even dumber than I give you credit for.

    Peace,
    Sherm

    “To funny” should be “too funny”.

    You’re even dumber than I give you credit for.

    Hi Sherm,

    How true, my writing skills are meager. I know when iffen calls me an 88 – that he is snickering – he thinks that 88 is my IQ. (I fear he gives me to much credit.)

    But then – who is better off – someone who is not so bright but tells the truth, or someone who is bright, but bases his whole existence on a packet of untruths?

    Peace — Art

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. joe webb says:
    @Corvinus
    "using my old Webster’s definition of bigot, that it is someone intolerant of new information/ideas, and completely closed minded, and emotionally very reactive, etc. then conservatives too can be bigots."

    So far, so good.

    "however, the conservative, holds on to old truths and prejudices, which are usually correct. Etc."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ytCEuuW2_A

    You ASSUME that these "old truths and prejudices" are usually correct.

    "The liberal commies, etc. are in total emotional reaction to the new old information on race, intelligence, and so on."

    Here you assume, once gain, that liberals are commies, and commies are liberals. When you have this mentality, you will dismiss any information to the contrary. That makes substantive conversation difficult.

    "Liberals, etc today are besides themselves with fury. For example I was successfully flirting with a young MD at the gym, but had stayed away for a year or so, cuz i though she was a jew."

    So a potential mate whom you thought was Jewish, you refused to have a conservation with. That sounds reasonable (rolling of eyes).

    "Since I was quitting cuz of the negroes, and other techies, and chinks…and stupid white bone-smashers, I decided to check this gal out and finally approached her."

    So you quit a gym because of your own bigotry. That seems reasonable (rolling of eyes).

    "We were getting along famously, ( you know how the ladies can gush ) and as it turned out she was not a jew, but an Iranian, and we clicked on the Jewish Question, I mentioned that I was kinda conservative. End of Story. She went ballistic. Are you a Trump guy? Goodbye to rationality as the female, especially , psyche kicked it, even in a smart gal, again, MD. She said that she knew how I thought and felt."

    Irony escapes you. You were irrational when you refused to talk to her and quit the gym. You acted in EXACTLY the same way.

    the fundamental principle of sanity is don’t do things that don’t work for you .

    An Open Mind is an empty mind…an old line from a dead friend.

    One’s mind is Open until one has filled it with argument and evidence. Sooner or later, you close y0ur mind to the same old nonsense.

    I did not refuse to talk to her, except on the jewish issue, which I have already covered. I have had several jewish girl friends, but now that I have become jew-wise, it just saves time, theirs and mine to forget about it….I remained courteous while she had lit the fuse to her abuse…she started making hostile remarks, like are you going to go home and watch Trump? etc. I let that go and kept smiling.

    Maybe I did not make clear that there were two interactions separated by a couple days. I went back the second time to see if she had sobered up a bit. She hadn’t. After she insulted me again, I wished her good luck, and that was it.

    So, Corvinus, you must be real young. You don’t see the logic in leaving certain people alone…when they crap on you. Jews, Negroes, chinks, etc. have all had their probationary periods with me. They have failed to make the cut. Also quite a few White Nationalists have failed as well.

    Grow up there Corvinas, it saves time. Close your mind to proven fools. and get on down the road of counter-revolution. Others Out, including your own genome.
    JW

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. joe webb says:

    liberals and commies….as an old democratic socialist, and as retaining a bit of that in my political metaphysic…share the wealth with my fellow whites cuz we are unequal and you or I did not Earn our high brain power, etc, surprise surprise, I do know what I am talking about after a lifetime of observation on the various fauna of the left.?

    As Wilmore Robertson said a half century ago, Liberalism is the pimping little sister of communism. I could go on and on with this. For example the handsome Negro Van Jones who is now a Big Deal at the Dem Party, is a communist. I know cuz i have seen him operate personally a dozen plus years ago and so on before I had consolidated my conversion to sanity.

    Then there are the obvious examples of the negro Black Panther, Angela Davis ( is that right?) or the Ayers commie of Obongo, and so on. The liberals love the Hollywood Ten, all jews, from yesteryear. etc. They love every Person Of Kolor to come along who Hates Whitey, etc. Maybe you are just too young and have not read the social history of the Left in America.

    You have an Open Mind. Time to grow up. JW

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    correction: with regard to Robertson, it is Wilmot, not Wilmore. HIs book is The Dispossessed Majority and he also wrote a book on how to achieve a White State.

    I wish I had discovered The Dispossessed Majority back in the 70s...it would have Changed me likitysplit, or at least within a couple months.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. Karl says:
    @Sherman
    Hey Genius,

    "To funny" should be "too funny".

    You're even dumber than I give you credit for.

    Peace,
    Sherm

    120 Sherm >Hey Genius,
    >
    >“To funny” should be “too funny”.

    Karl’s Razor: do not blame on “poor grammar”, that which is more likely to be “poor typing”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. Svigor says:

    You are arguing from a false premise in that America was founded and developed exclusively by white Europeans. First, Europeans saw themselves as unique in and of themselves during the Age of Exploration. They did not “mix” with one another, except for the aristocrats in order to secure power and influence. Second, Africans were imported for labor, and tribal groups removed by force. Third, American whites today generally do not refer to themselves as being a English-American or a German-American or a white European, but an American who comes from one or more European backgrounds. Americans are racial and ethnic mutts.

    Is there a point in there, somewhere? Other than to deny the obvious, that America was founded and developed exclusively by Europeans, I mean. Which non-European group made a substantial contribution to the American Revolution?

    You ought to study your history. Recall that Africans who were imported as slaves were Muslim and were forced to convert to Christianity.

    Well, they were forced to convert to Islam and made into slaves by Muslims, so maybe they were used to it. A heck of a lot of black slaves were previously animist, not Muslim, btw.

    Irony escapes you. You were irrational when you refused to talk to her and quit the gym. You acted in EXACTLY the same way.

    This from Corvanus, the guy who freely admits that he doesn’t post on lefty sites, because they’ll ban him. His presence here is a testament to leftist bigotry.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  142. Svigor says:

    One’s mind is Open until one has filled it with argument and evidence. Sooner or later, you close y0ur mind to the same old nonsense.

    Amen to that. I have heard all of their lies, hundreds of times over. At some point it behooves the rational man to devote a much smaller portion of his time and mental resources to entertaining them. Sort of like I scan Corvanus’ posts just enough to pick out 4 or 5 stupidities per post to fling back at him. He’s a complete shitbird and liar (I despise liars) and deserves no serious attention.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    thanks Svigor. the only thing I would add with regard to an Open mind is one can remain on stand-by for anything relevant that comes along. Like Slezkine and Solzhenitsyn.

    Also, the stonewalling and water-muddying of the current Ruskies Are Coming of the Dems, demands a bit of our attention. What the Dems are bringing is civil war, which will be the first civil war to play out in context of the Large State/large military and ]police.

    JW
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. joe webb says:
    @joe webb
    liberals and commies....as an old democratic socialist, and as retaining a bit of that in my political metaphysic...share the wealth with my fellow whites cuz we are unequal and you or I did not Earn our high brain power, etc, surprise surprise, I do know what I am talking about after a lifetime of observation on the various fauna of the left.?

    As Wilmore Robertson said a half century ago, Liberalism is the pimping little sister of communism. I could go on and on with this. For example the handsome Negro Van Jones who is now a Big Deal at the Dem Party, is a communist. I know cuz i have seen him operate personally a dozen plus years ago and so on before I had consolidated my conversion to sanity.

    Then there are the obvious examples of the negro Black Panther, Angela Davis ( is that right?) or the Ayers commie of Obongo, and so on. The liberals love the Hollywood Ten, all jews, from yesteryear. etc. They love every Person Of Kolor to come along who Hates Whitey, etc. Maybe you are just too young and have not read the social history of the Left in America.

    You have an Open Mind. Time to grow up. JW

    correction: with regard to Robertson, it is Wilmot, not Wilmore. HIs book is The Dispossessed Majority and he also wrote a book on how to achieve a White State.

    I wish I had discovered The Dispossessed Majority back in the 70s…it would have Changed me likitysplit, or at least within a couple months.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. Miro23 says:
    @pogohere
    Re: "Spain 15th Century – Why the Jews were expelled Occidental Dissent"

    Reads a bit like this one:

    STALIN’S WILLING EXECUTIONERS

    JEWS AS A HOSTILE ELITE IN THE USSR

    The Jewish Century

    Yuri Slezkine

    Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004 $29.95 (cloth) x + 438 pages

    Reviewed by Kevin MacDonald

    A persistent theme among critics of Jews—particularly those on the pre-World War II right—has been that the Bolshevik revolution was a Jewish revolution and that the Soviet Union was dominated by Jews. This theme appears in a wide range of writings, from Henry Ford’s International Jew, to published statements by a long list of British, French, and American political figures in the 1920s (Winston Churchill, Woodrow Wilson, and David Lloyd George), and, in its most extreme form, by Adolf Hitler, who wrote:

    "Now begins the last great revolution. By wresting political power for himself, the Jew casts off the few remaining shreds of disguise he still wears. The democratic plebeian Jew turns into the blood Jew and the tyrant of peoples. In a few years he will try to exterminate the national pillars of intelligence and, by robbing the peoples of their natural spiritual leadership, will make them ripe for the slavish lot of a permanent subjugation. The most terrible example of this is Russia."

    This long tradition stands in sharp contradiction to the official view, promulgated by Jewish organizations and almost all contemporary historians, that Jews played no special role in Bolshevism and indeed were specifically victimized by it. Yuri Slezkine’s book provides a much needed resolution to these opposing perspectives. It is an intellectual tour de force, alternately muddled and brilliant, courageous and apologetic.

    http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/slezkinerev.pdf

    Yuri Slezkine’s book provides a much needed resolution to these opposing perspectives. It is an intellectual tour de force, alternately muddled and brilliant, courageous and apologetic.

    I’m not sure about that. I read it some years ago and would call it more intellectually dishonest (plenty of distortion through omission) and celebratory of some truly evil people.

    Just one example from my notes after reading it:

    The main body of the book deals with the Jewish experience in Russia, mostly after the 1917 Bolshevik revolution, and highlights the leading role of Jews in the revolution itself and in the top echelons of the Communist government. In fact they had an explicitly protected status until the final years of the Stalin dictatorship and the author shows that they were the most enthusiastic revolutionary activists.

    An evaluation of their “work” is missing from Slezkine’s account, but it actually involved supervising the murder of the Russian royal family, arranging the liquidation or transportation to work/death camps of all educated Russians, the murder of 50% or more of national minorities and organizing the killing of 3 million+ Ukrainian farmers in the winter of 1932-1933. The latter atrocity was planned and executed by Lazar Kaganovich who astonishingly only gets a sympathetic page with regard to his childhood education. Furthermore, the slaughter of the Russian and Ukrainian Slavic population was accompanied by the establishment of a new Jewish “revolutionary” bourgeoise which the author documents in some detail as they enjoy their new country dachas, worship Pushkin and attend elite educational academies (the inspiration behind George Orwell’s book, “Animal Farm: A Fairy Story”.

    https://www.amazon.com/Animal-farm-Fairy-George-Orwell/dp/0451526341/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1488746139&sr=1-1&keywords=animal+farm%2C+orwell

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    Slezkine is a must-read even if it is incomplete.

    As I recall he is half Russian and half Jew. At least he gets at it somewhat, from a respectable position in academe.

    It provides space for Solzhenitsyn's Two Hundred Years Together, which will probably tell the whole tale when it appears in English.

    I have a partial edition put out in binder and cheap paper form. Does anybody know if the book form in English in available? HW
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. annamaria says:

    Off-topic but this is so nicely (and timely) written on the faux president/peace laureate, that this reserves more exposure:

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/03/03/obamas-book-deal-the-60-million-selfie/

    “Obama’s Book Deal: the $60 Million Selfie,” by Mat Stevenson
    “The person beating the loudest drums against Obama having written the songs of himself is Jack Cashill, a midwestern professor, who—as if deconstructing Shakespeare in search of homoerotic imagery—chose to pull apart Obama’s books to prove that Obama did not write Dreams [from My Father] and, further, that whoever wrote Dreams did not write The Audacity of Hope, a book of campaign hackwork.”
    Yes, Ladies and Gentlemen, Mr. Obama has been consistently fraudulent in everything, including his alleged authorship of two autobiographies.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  146. Toad says:

    What is ignorant about the ‘alt-right’ and even this article is that Asians outperform whites.

    Hence, there are no ‘white enclaves’ in big cities anymore, since Asians can outprice whites.

    Asians includes both yellow Asians and brown Indians.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  147. joe webb says:
    @Miro23

    Yuri Slezkine’s book provides a much needed resolution to these opposing perspectives. It is an intellectual tour de force, alternately muddled and brilliant, courageous and apologetic.
     
    I'm not sure about that. I read it some years ago and would call it more intellectually dishonest (plenty of distortion through omission) and celebratory of some truly evil people.

    Just one example from my notes after reading it:

    The main body of the book deals with the Jewish experience in Russia, mostly after the 1917 Bolshevik revolution, and highlights the leading role of Jews in the revolution itself and in the top echelons of the Communist government. In fact they had an explicitly protected status until the final years of the Stalin dictatorship and the author shows that they were the most enthusiastic revolutionary activists.

    An evaluation of their "work" is missing from Slezkine's account, but it actually involved supervising the murder of the Russian royal family, arranging the liquidation or transportation to work/death camps of all educated Russians, the murder of 50% or more of national minorities and organizing the killing of 3 million+ Ukrainian farmers in the winter of 1932-1933. The latter atrocity was planned and executed by Lazar Kaganovich who astonishingly only gets a sympathetic page with regard to his childhood education. Furthermore, the slaughter of the Russian and Ukrainian Slavic population was accompanied by the establishment of a new Jewish "revolutionary" bourgeoise which the author documents in some detail as they enjoy their new country dachas, worship Pushkin and attend elite educational academies (the inspiration behind George Orwell's book, "Animal Farm: A Fairy Story".
    https://www.amazon.com/Animal-farm-Fairy-George-Orwell/dp/0451526341/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1488746139&sr=1-1&keywords=animal+farm%2C+orwell

    Slezkine is a must-read even if it is incomplete.

    As I recall he is half Russian and half Jew. At least he gets at it somewhat, from a respectable position in academe.

    It provides space for Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together, which will probably tell the whole tale when it appears in English.

    I have a partial edition put out in binder and cheap paper form. Does anybody know if the book form in English in available? HW

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. joe webb says:
    @Svigor

    One’s mind is Open until one has filled it with argument and evidence. Sooner or later, you close y0ur mind to the same old nonsense.
     
    Amen to that. I have heard all of their lies, hundreds of times over. At some point it behooves the rational man to devote a much smaller portion of his time and mental resources to entertaining them. Sort of like I scan Corvanus' posts just enough to pick out 4 or 5 stupidities per post to fling back at him. He's a complete shitbird and liar (I despise liars) and deserves no serious attention.

    thanks Svigor. the only thing I would add with regard to an Open mind is one can remain on stand-by for anything relevant that comes along. Like Slezkine and Solzhenitsyn.

    Also, the stonewalling and water-muddying of the current Ruskies Are Coming of the Dems, demands a bit of our attention. What the Dems are bringing is civil war, which will be the first civil war to play out in context of the Large State/large military and ]police.

    JW

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. joe webb says:

    here is more on our current discontents…Third World Democracy:

    NYTimes.com: Protesters Disrupt Speech by ‘Bell Curve’ Author at Vermont College

    >
    Sent: Sunday, March 5, 2017 10:36 AM
    Subject: Fw: NYTimes.com: Protesters Disrupt Speech by ‘Bell Curve’ Author at Vermont College

    “There, several masked protesters, who were believed to be outside agitators, began pushing and shoving Mr. Murray and Ms. Stanger, Mr. Burger said. “Someone grabbed Allison’s hair and twisted her neck,” he said.”

    The Third World Democrats, and assorted low life do the only thing they can do, since they can do nothing else. Where were the cops anyway?

    Murray, who, it has been said, that after the punishment he got from the libs for The Bell Curve, had not ventured out again into the killing fields of Race in America, was apparently going to speak about his recent book, Coming Apart, which is an examination of social forces mostly amongst whites, not third worlders, with regard to the election.

    What he said at the podium was not reported here. He had retreated to a TV studio to speak after being shouted down and this above quote apparently concerns the walk to the studio. The conservative students who had invited him apparently were looking for more info in the regard of white voters and Trump.

    The jewtimes describes the armies of the night, as ‘disruptive’….not exactly, they forced the cancellation of the talk. And they committed assault and battery, and aggravated by Hatred.

    “Bill Burger, a spokesman for the college, said in an interview: “There are people who are eager to portray college students or the entire higher education establishment as hopelessly out of touch, a bastion of liberal indoctrination, and I think that’s fundamentally false. However, events like last night’s do feed that false narrative.””

    Jewyorktimes & Co. is responsible for this outlaw behavior. Where were the cops? They were corralled by the libs and cowardly cop administrators who fear the Left and the Liberal capons, who hate cops, especially if they are white.

    Contrary to Bill Burger, above, the college culture in the US is another manifestation of the historically rooted religious evangelism/Great Awakeningings now morphed into Revolutionary politics in a secular age. It is a millenarian movement of Human Perfectionism, Perfection on Earth as it is in Heaven, which has long rocked the boat of Religion per se, like the actual evangelism of the Return of Christ types, who also link that to Israel and Second Coming, etc. Guaranteed war in this all-or-nothing insanity.

    The Reformation’s wilder side included political revolution’s leveling, sexual libertinism, and lots of violence. The chat about Separation of Church and State, is wildly far off the mark, never mind the simple matter of no establishment of religion by the State. Separation of the Religious from The Political is fundamental to politics.

    When the two are confounded, the result is utopian excess, violence, and Non-negotiable Demands, Black-speak in other words. The State must protect itself from this invasion of fantastic Ideas of Equality, especially racial equality. The cops need to be called, heads cracked, criminals into the slammer, and the rest of it.

    Imagine if Murray, growing some balls, decided to smash these assault/batterers in the chops, maybe getting killed himself…the likely outcome. He would go down in the books as a hero and a real Man, who possibly started the next phase of Trumpism. The Open Minds, including mine for many years…the childishness of liberals and lefties, blind to 50 years of Uplift for the Negro. Nothing has worked after a trillion dollars down the black hole of Education Programs, etc.

    What Murray and Hernstein found in The Bell Curve, by deconstructing many studies of True Believers, is that nothing determined success or failure of Blacks but Black IQ. They found, among other things that medical schools indeed lowered their standards for Blacks, one standard in particular of 114, as I recall , being the lowest IQ limit for admissions, was frequently violated.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  150. @Jason Liu
    Perhaps deep down the leftists realize that desire for ethnic nationalism and homogeneity is basically the human norm, and one of, if not the most important political motivators throughout history.

    They tell themselves that "modern" values of pluralism and equality have superseded the ways of the past, but inside they suspect that humanity has not actually changed that much, and that their deeply held beliefs are actually a cult produced by naive 18th century European idealists who had no foresight or realistic understanding of human interactions.

    To see their own belief system crumble before their eyes, whether through white nationalism or their own aversion to the minorities, must cause a great cognitive dissonance for them. When people feel this way, they often double down on their erroneous beliefs, becoming more extreme as a way to combat their own inner doubts.

    This is why the angriest, most deranged leftists are often white people, because their leftism is an ideological devotion deeply enmeshed with their emotions, whereas minorities tend to support leftism for the more mundane and understandable reason of personal interest.

    I think you’ve absolutely nailed it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. juster says:

    Professor Weissberg is hardly unfamiliar with the Jewish question, given his earlier friendly correspondence with Kevin MacDonald.

    The fact is increasingly there are a few Jews who see what is happening to whites and don’t like it. There is no desire for us Jews to lead the alt-right in any way. We are trying to describe its rationale using Israel and Zionism as a comparison so that Jews and liberals can understand it.

    This piece is by a Jew who is friendly to whites and can see their struggle from their point of view. There’s no reason to make it into anything more complicated (or sinister) than that. You’ll increasingly see more of this in the future.

    Better that some Jews sympathize than keep calling you Nazis.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  152. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Daniel Chieh
    Well, they were once outsiders too. We just have more assimilated them. As for the West, the glory of the West is that their strong ideas can often forge them ahead to great new heights and the failure of the West is that their strong ideas seem to drive them to suicidal excesses, too.

    Interesting idea.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. @Mao Cheng Ji

    Read carefully next time.
     
    Heh. This sounds familiar - are you a liberal? Yeah, being an asshole unable to communicate with people is the most common liberal trait; thanks for reminding me.

    The Corvinus being is a liberal troll.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. imbroglio says:
    @ThereisaGod
    The globalist oligarchy opposes and (successfully) forbids whites collectively defending their interests. How can one explain this?
    The most obvious one is that Jews (VERY committed to their own ethnic interests) have taken over leadership of the western world from whites and are determined to eliminate their major competitor for once and for all ... via these kind of cultural mind wars. Oh, and by engineered mass immigration of Africans and Arabs into all (of what were once understood to be) white societies.

    Anyone got a better explanation?

    The only other possible explanation, as I see it, is that the invisible "oligarchy" driving global events are not primarily Jewish [they are certainly not ENTIRELY Jewish] but rather (for want of a better word) Satanists who, by definition, are entirely devoted to self-interest and who consider ordinary folk to be, at best, slaves and, at worst, an enemy to be systematically enslaved or destroyed. These Satanists, being very cunning, USE 'The Jewish People'. They hide behind their amplified victimhood and use Jews, whenever possible, to front their criminal projects (in business, banking and government) in the public domain. So that if we turn on our masters we will attack only Jews and the entirely innocent ones (NEARLY ALL Jews who are merely brainwashed muppets like ourselves)

    Either way, the issue of who are are our warmongering diabolical rulers cannot be addressed without addressing this Jewish question. If Jews genuinely turn against their own leadership as Christ commanded them ... we will all be saved. Without this collective Jewish change of heart it is hard to see anything but disaster on the horizon. One way or another.

    Jews need to ask themselves.
    This 'Equality', 'Liberal', 'anti-Racist' agenda to which we are all committed ... are we committed because we LOVE ALL THE HUMAN RACE and will defend and protect universal rights? Or are we committed because we want to live in a society dominated by the globalist international bankers driving this Imperialist agenda.
    Do we REALLY love our neighbours or do we love the tyranny this hijacking of human moral conscience is actually manufacturing.
    Because it is "OUR" tyranny?
    The intention at the bottom (in Communist societies) can be sincere (if stupid). The intention at the top is always TOTALLY INSINCERE. The people at the top do not care about "equality" AT ALL!
    AT ALL!
    And sincerity (regarding spirituality and, please reflect on it, our eternal destiny) is everything.

    Historically, when cultures falter and come apart, Jews are caught in the crossfire and are easy scapegoats largely because, as you say, they often front for the interests that care little for the common people. If you have experience of Jewish people, and it sounds as though you do, you realize that Jews, especially American Jews, are not monolithic. Jewish people, in increasing numbers, are losing their Jewish identity and assimilating into mainline white America at a rapid pace. Americans of partial Jewish ancestry are a rising proportion of the Jewish or, now, quasi-Jewish population.

    This is a problem for alt-right ethnicists. What’s do be done with this people of mixed European race with traces, in many cases, of an ancient Aryan/Semitic admixture. The Jews are sui generis as the National Socialists well understood and fretted over. So you have an American Jewish population that, for the most part, lives like their white neighbors, thinks like their white neighbors, shares their white neighbors’ values and, for all intents and purposes, have amalgamated with the white American “race” yet do not share, in all respects, the genetic makeup of the dominant white population.

    Prejudice will likely out, but for those of a broader view, what to make of the vanishing Jew? At a Burns Night supper in January, there were upwards of thirty Jewish men and women in attendance, the men in kilts and sporans, rising when the haggis was piped in, reciting the Selkirk Grace and behaving just like the American Scots in attendance. When asked what drew them to attend Burns Night, the reply was simply, “We love Robbie Burns.” Interlopers? Or a people who feel it a privilege to be permitted to become a part of an America that many others are now happy to trash?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Brigadon
    Secular traitors?

    I wonder why people keep ignoring the explicit pro-christianity core of the alt right. Because it is not as 'shocking' as the race realism? Or because there are a bunch of alt-Dawkins entryists that still try to pretend that christian values are not every bit as mandatory to the creation and survival of western-style culture as northern European Stock?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. Brigadon says:
    @imbroglio
    Historically, when cultures falter and come apart, Jews are caught in the crossfire and are easy scapegoats largely because, as you say, they often front for the interests that care little for the common people. If you have experience of Jewish people, and it sounds as though you do, you realize that Jews, especially American Jews, are not monolithic. Jewish people, in increasing numbers, are losing their Jewish identity and assimilating into mainline white America at a rapid pace. Americans of partial Jewish ancestry are a rising proportion of the Jewish or, now, quasi-Jewish population.

    This is a problem for alt-right ethnicists. What's do be done with this people of mixed European race with traces, in many cases, of an ancient Aryan/Semitic admixture. The Jews are sui generis as the National Socialists well understood and fretted over. So you have an American Jewish population that, for the most part, lives like their white neighbors, thinks like their white neighbors, shares their white neighbors' values and, for all intents and purposes, have amalgamated with the white American "race" yet do not share, in all respects, the genetic makeup of the dominant white population.

    Prejudice will likely out, but for those of a broader view, what to make of the vanishing Jew? At a Burns Night supper in January, there were upwards of thirty Jewish men and women in attendance, the men in kilts and sporans, rising when the haggis was piped in, reciting the Selkirk Grace and behaving just like the American Scots in attendance. When asked what drew them to attend Burns Night, the reply was simply, "We love Robbie Burns." Interlopers? Or a people who feel it a privilege to be permitted to become a part of an America that many others are now happy to trash?

    Secular traitors?

    I wonder why people keep ignoring the explicit pro-christianity core of the alt right. Because it is not as ‘shocking’ as the race realism? Or because there are a bunch of alt-Dawkins entryists that still try to pretend that christian values are not every bit as mandatory to the creation and survival of western-style culture as northern European Stock?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. Rue says:
    @Cloudswrest
    Recapitulating Archie Bunker.

    https://youtu.be/ALE6ENavvJQ

    (((Norman Lear))) — the echo that reverberates with the tones of white genocide.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. martin2 says:
    @Gene Su
    Here is part 2 of my reaction to this article (and many other similar articles on the Unz review). Warning: long post follows.

    I think someone needs to write an article on *why* so many whites are fooled into believing that there is no black underclass problem and that the Alt-Right's rantings are completely untrue. Conservatives harp about how the media has painted a rosy picture of blacks but that is a minor factor. I have written this argument on the blog posts for Dr. Gottfried's recent article and will probably write this more times in the future.

    Most whites have *zero* contact with underclass blacks. This is especially true during their adolescent years. Most non-whites do not attend public schools that are majority black. A white child is more likely to encounter a white thug in elementary school than a black thug.

    No, seriously, think about it! If you go to a public school that is 99% white, chances are that all of the delinquents and trouble makers you meet are white. Amren likes to publish lots of nasty incidents involving black punks. So? There are plenty of incidents with white punks. I have seen white boys and white girls violently beating one another. I have had rocks thrown at me by white a-holes. I have had my stuff stolen by white thugs. I once violently beat the crap out of a white kid who threw a rock at me in summer camp and the counselor care-taker (who I admit was black) tried to protect him. Nicholas Stix once griped about how black adults (especially women) would try to protect black thugs. So? There were innumerable times when I was told by white teachers and caretakers that I better ignore my tormenters and turn the other cheek. It is very difficult to expel or discpline a white troublemaker in a suburban school.

    This has nothing to do with racism. The problem is that there is a massive decline in disciplinary standards in our public schools. A child also has far less freedom and options today to avoid punks and thugs. When you have a bloated bureaucracy like in many public schools, you're going to have some adult care-takers who might not be morally responsible.

    A child who constantly is subjected to this might conclude that the white society from which these trouble makers come from is rotten to the core and has nothing to offer. Note that I am trying to point out the disconnect between what most people witness in their formative years and what the overall reality is. Unless you have access to crime statistics like Steve Sailer and Jared Taylor, you would not know that the black underclass is disproportionately responsible for most violent crime in America.

    I agree with you. Because white people interact on a daily basis mainly with other white people, any bad experiences to be had are almost certainly going to be involving other white people. I wrote about this many years ago elsewhere when a hard up white lady of my acquaintance was ripped off for a thousand pounds by a white plumber. I asked at the time: how are we supposed to feel any affinity with HIM just because he is white? These types of experiences are more likely to induce visceral hate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. […] “Why Is the Alt-Right So Threatening?” by Robert Weissberg, Unz.com, March 2, […]

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
A simple remedy for income stagnation