The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Andrew Joyce Archive
Why I Write
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I have written it as an attempt at justice.”
Hilaire Belloc, Introduction to The Jews (1922)

Several weeks ago I participated in a discussion of my work with Kevin MacDonald for TOQLive, and in the days prior to that I had a look at my past articles in the TOO author’s archive. It came as something of a surprise to see that there are now almost two hundred essays, blog posts, and translations (in five languages) under my name, submitted over a seven year period. I really hadn’t realised I’d written that many essays, though I suppose it goes some way towards explaining Rabbi Bruce Warshal’s description of me as a “prolific anti-Semitic academic.” In some ways these years seem to have flown by. A lot has happened. The roster of writers at The Occidental Observer, with the exception of a couple of returning stalwarts like Brenton Sanderson and Edmund Connolly, has changed somewhat. This is due in part to the fact this website stands at the frontline of the culture war and bears several scars. To say nothing of the early years of The Occidental Observer, during my time writing for the site two TOO writers were doxxed by the SPLC and have not returned, the site underwent a period of DDOS attacks in 2015 (with some of the offending IPs originating in Israel), and we were then deplatformed from PayPal as part of a concerted post-Charlottesville censorship strategy by our opponents. Outside TOO, between 2012 and 2019 I made a brief foray into politics, delivered speeches in three countries, edited a few books, became a father two more times, started work on a volume of my own work, was arrested twice on spurious allegations relating to my political opinions, was (temporarily) prohibited from entering the United States, and managed to get banned from Twitter more times than I can now remember. I have no regrets, and in fact found much of it enjoyable. During this busy and important period in my life, and that of the movement, I believe my reasons for writing developed, matured, and evolved, and I thought I’d share my thoughts on this.

My path to The Occidental Observer probably began in 2004/5, a few years before the website was created. It was during that year that I began reading large amounts of academic material on the historical relationship between Jews and Europeans, a process that began with Daniel Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners (1996) and steadily developed to encompass most of the field’s mainstream authors including Robert Wistrich, Jacob Katz, Gavin Langmuir, Schmuel Almog, Dan Cohn-Sherbok, Kenneth Stow, Yehuda Bauer, David Sorkin, Marvin Perry, and Frederick Schweitzer. Although most of the books produced by these authors were well-written, had a polished academic veneer, and were published by some of the most-respected publishing houses in academia, I felt they all suffered, to borrow Albert Lindemann’s description of Robert Wistrich’s work, from repeating the same “colourful and indignant narrative, accompanied by weak, sometimes tendentious analysis.”[1]Lindemann, Esau’s Tears, p.x. It occurred to me very early on that it wasn’t altogether healthy for Jews to dominate the academic discussion of the historical relationship between their people and other peoples, and that resulting histories were bound to come with their own subtle or not-so-subtle biases. By the time I made it to Anthony Julius’s Trials of the Diaspora (Oxford, 2010), I had grown quite suspicious of Jewish-authored histories of anti-Semitism, and Julius’s extremely arrogant and manipulative work was in some sense a final straw. In the opening of Part 1 of Trials of the Diaspora, Julius opined that anti-Semites were mere charlatans in search of something to appear “expert” in,[2]Julius, Trials of the Diaspora, pp.22-3. but I came away from his book wondering if it wasn’t Jews who were claiming the monopoly on expertise in anti-Semitism, entirely ignoring the other half of a very long and painful story.

Julius also wrote that no anti-Semite has ever “carried his anti-Semitic convictions tentatively.”[3]Ibid, p.21.
(Julius, Trials of the Diaspora, pp.22-3.)
Ironically, by the time I had finished reading his book I was beginning to do just that. Doubts and suspicions had slowly given way to the realisation that readers like me were being manipulated, and even insulted along with our ancestors, by the production of works like Trials of the Diaspora. And, in a twist of fate, the next book I happened to read after Trials of the Diaspora was Kevin MacDonald’s A People That Shall Dwell Alone. I really can’t remember if I’d read any negative material about Kevin prior to reading PTSDA. My feeling is that I read the book “blind,” and that the book had come up during a library catalog trawl for relevant books rather than a text I deliberately sought out. The edition I later received from my library also happened to be the original, very traditional-looking hardback, so I completed the book, I assume, without any sense of the controversy that by then attended it. I was, however, sufficiently intrigued and encouraged by PTSDA to try to find out if Kevin had authored any other books on Jews and anti-Semitism, and it was at that point that I think I encountered the ADL and SPLC hit pieces, and the broader mainstream response to his trilogy. I wasn’t much affected by the propaganda, and was delighted to discover Kevin’s own academic website, where he offered responses to the criticisms of the trilogy levelled by other academics, many of whom clearly hadn’t read the works in question. After reading most of the online exchanges, I ordered the entire trilogy in paperback.

It was several weeks after finishing Culture of Critique that I discovered The Occidental Observer while searching for further work by Kevin. I remember clearly that the very first piece I read was Brenton Sanderson’s April 2011 essay ‘Why Mahler? Norman Lebrecht and the Construction of Jewish Genius.’ Like all productions by Sanderson before and since, the essay was exceptional, and, after Kevin, Sanderson remains my favourite contemporary writer on the subject of Jewish influence and anti-Semitism. It was an extremely pleasant surprise to find Jewish matters, and the issue of anti-Semitism, being discussed at a very high (and honest!) level, and I became a dedicated TOO reader many months before I became a TOO writer. I continued to carry out research into the mainstream productions of Jewish historiography, while letting TOO broaden my mind to some of the more contemporary political and cultural manifestations of age-old problems. Contrary to the assertions of Julius, much of this remained tentative, and I remained open to counter-arguments or any evidence against the ideas I was beginning to form or agree with. To some extent I still am, even if the counter-arguments are shallow and the evidence against “anti-Semitism” thus far non-existent.

Some months after becoming a TOO reader, I began an email exchange with Kevin MacDonald, explaining something of my own academic background, some interesting encounters I’d had with Jews, and relating some tales from my own research. I recall being delighted with the mere fact I got a reply to my first email which, if I remember correctly, was simply a brief message of support in reference to the SPLC’s activism against Kevin’s place of employment and the broader campaign of vilification that had been relentlessly carried out by Heidi Beirich. As our exchange developed, the idea then arose that I might contribute a piece of writing to The Occidental Observer. My intensive reading in Jewish historiography was by then very extensive and the options for subject matter were almost unlimited but, since it was fast approaching St. Patrick’s Day, I decided to write a short piece on the little-known boycott of Jews in Limerick, Ireland in 1904. My first essay, posted on St. Patrick’s Day 2012, was positively received by Kevin and the TOO readership, and I resolved that, time permitting, I would make the effort to offer further contributions.

These early contributions reflected my background in academia, and my growing fascination (and horror) with the ways in which Jews wrote about themselves and their history. I came to see Jewish influence in academia and the writing of Jewish history (and that concerning anti-Semitism) as especially pernicious, and almost all of my early TOO essays therefore concerned myth-making in historiography. A couple of months after the Limerick piece I submitted a much longer and more serious examination of the idea and reality of “pogroms” in Russian history, based primarily on my reading of the works of John Doyle Klier between 2009 and 2011. Klier (1944-2007) was a well-respected academic at University College London who had been head of the British Association for Jewish Studies. Klier’s work, which was almost as influential on me as MacDonald’s, was built around the most detailed and rigorous examination of the history of Jews in the Russian empire that had then been undertaken. It was his posthumously published Russians, Jews and the Pogroms of 1881-82 (Cambridge, 2011) that contained some of the biggest bombshells. Klier demonstrated how Jewish-owned Western newspapers like England’s Daily Telegraph had pre-existing animosities towards Russia, and were only too eager to disseminate en masse the sensational and entirely fictional accounts of Russian atrocities against Jews. After years of reading about “deniers” and “denial” in relation to Jewish historical narratives, here was quite literally one of the top academics in Jewish Studies (and one of its very few non-Jews) announcing that the pogrom narratives were inventions of reporters from the Jewish World that are “flatly contradicted by the historical record,” that they were first embellished and spread by Rabbis in Prussia, and that all such reports of Russian brutality should be treated with “extreme caution.”[4]Klier, Russians, Jews and the Pogroms of 1881-82, pp.399-401. Anthony Julius had argued that people turn to anti-Semitic ideas when they want to appear as experts, but here was a widely-acknowledged bona fide expert essentially describing one of the foundational narratives of modern Jewishness as a manipulative lie. And because Julius was by now a disdainful background note to much of ongoing research, I decided to exorcise him by offering a dissection of Trials of the Diaspora in my next long essay.

My thinking in Jewish matters retained an exclusively academic focus until halfway through 2013. In early 2013 I produced an extended essay on the Jewish promotion of Spinoza almost by accident, after Kevin MacDonald sent me a review of Jonathan Israel’s book on Spinoza as an example of mutual promotion among Jewish academics. In another twist of fate, I happened to be in a college library when I received the email, and when I looked up from my laptop screen I was right beside the section of philosophy texts covering Spinoza. For the next few weeks I devoured almost everything they had on Spinoza, assessing each monograph for authorship, approach, and its evaluation of Spinoza’s place in history. The resulting essay now seems to me a prose bibliography with a focus on ethnicity, illustrating the extraordinary bias of Jewish academics and intellectuals over historical time. And of all the essays I’ve written for TOO, it’s one of which I remain particularly proud. After the Spinoza piece, I began investing more time investigating contemporary Jewish activism. In May 2013 I submitted a review of government texts discussing the notorious Marc Rich case, which involved almost every aspect of contemporary Jewish behaviours that can best be described simply under the umbrella term ‘Semitism’ – White collar crime, questionable Jewish loyalty, international ethnic networking, Israel as a refuge for Jewish criminality, the use of charges of anti-Semitism to evade criticism or punishment, and the exertion of influence on (and cultivation of links with) non-Jewish elites. The examination of the Rich case was again very influential on my own thinking, and my author archive shows I took a six month hiatus from writing after the article was posted. I remember coming to the strong realisation in mid-2013 that the Jewish Question was not simply a matter of history, or for that matter simply a matter of Jewish historians “batting for their team,” but rather something much more profound and infinitely more harmful to the contemporary interests of Whites/Europeans. This took me some time to digest and come to terms with.

When I returned to TOO in January 2014, my motivations for writing had fundamentally changed and I think this was reflected in the tone, subject matter, and pace of my writing from that date forward, with the result that I moved from an average of five pieces per year in 2013 to making 24 or more entries per year in 2017/8. Foremost in my motivation for writing was (and remains) a desire to protect the interests and future of my children, which I felt was being threatened by Jewish activism throughout the West. My first essay after my hiatus was absolutely in line with my new mindset: ‘Making “America as user-friendly to Jews as possible.” The Anti-Defamation League and the Indoctrination of our Youth.’ Re-reading the essay, it’s clear to me that writing for TOO had become, on some level, personal. “I have two young sons in elementary school,” I wrote. “What a morally, spiritually, culturally, and racially bankrupt world they will inherit. Abraham Foxman of the ADL claims he has been “losing sleep” over weakening American support for Israel. I endure sleepless nights because when I put my boys to bed at night, and watch them drift off to sleep as their blond hair falls softly across their pillows, I am filled with a dread inspired by the activities of that same Mr. Foxman. I know the future that he and others want for my sons, and I am moved to act in any way I can.” It’s now more than five years since I wrote those words, and I’ve become a father twice more in that time. They appear to me more real and urgent than ever.

Since that date, I’ve tried to offer as wide and as comprehensive analysis of Jewish activism as possible. The examinations of historiography have of course been retained. In addition to dissecting Julius, over time I’ve assessed the work of Wistrich, Langmuir, Cesarani, Ginsburg, Penslar, and (most recently) Hanebrink in detail, as well as discussing the work of many others in the course of broader analyses. I continue to believe that attacking the “colourful and indignant narratives” with their “weak, sometimes tendentious analyses” is an essential part of the culture war against Jewish influence in academia and society as a whole. Adding to this, I’ve tried to bring wider attention to credible mainstream academic texts that contain useful information or arguments, including The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews(Brill, 2010) by Robert Aleksander Maryks, and also bring new audiences to old texts like Hilaire Belloc’s The Jews(1922) or a three part survey of three centuries of useful anti-Semitic literature. It’s very gratifying to me that many of these essays, which are potentially alienating in the specificity of their subject matter and necessary employment of academic jargon, nevertheless attract a healthy readership and lively commentary – a testament to the quality of reader the site continues to attract.

Closely related to my work on Jewish historiography has been those examples of my work that attempt to drawn out comparisons between historical trends and contemporary events. A further motivation for my writing has therefore been to make clear and specific warnings based in historical fact. Where appropriate, I’ve offered historical examples as guides to current events or as predictors of future opposition strategies. In 2012, when I started writing for TOO, the heady days of the 2016 Alt-Right surge were almost unthinkable. Speculation instead revolved around the British National Party (now almost defunct) and other European pro-White political parties as avenues for potential ideological breakthrough into the mainstream. Dissidents of the Right, though marginalised, were also fairly secure on the internet. But a look through my archive suggests that I became seriously concerned about Jewish intentions in this sphere in January and (more urgently in) May of 2015 – fatefully late to raise the alarm in order to put counter-strategies in place, but eerily accurate in its prediction of the censorship measures taken against the Alt-Right in late 2016 (and which are still ongoing). As early as 2014 I clearly became very interested in historical patterns involving Jewish efforts to suppress mass freedoms in order to acquire privileges and security, with two essays (here and here) that year on Jewish attacks on free speech, and a further two (here and here) in January 2015. Other essays where I’ve drawn direct comparisons between historical and contemporary events include ‘Failed Crypsis and Its Discontents’ and ‘Jews Versus the Alt-Right: Lessons from History.’

A further motivation for my writing has been to offer an evidence-based argument in defense of the idea of anti-Semitism as a rational response to intensive resource competition between my people (and indeed other peoples) and the Jews. This idea is explained masterfully in the second volume of Kevin MacDonald’s trilogy, and I’ve tried to compliment it with new material and examples from history and also contemporary events. This has necessarily involved direct and honest confrontation with the alleged “canards” of anti-Semitism. As such, I’ve tackled issues like present-day Jewish moneylending and white collar crime, demonstrating that Jews have been, and remain, utterly prolific in the trade in debt and in financial criminality. Using hard evidence and public or mainstream sources I’ve also confronted Jewish representation in refugee and migration organizations, Jewish activism in sexual matters, and Jewish dominance in mass communications, as well as offering the first ‘anti-Semitic’ rebuttal to Jean-Paul Sartre’s much-lauded apologetic Anti-Semite and Jew. It’s my sincere hope that they constitute even the most modest contribution to our ideological armoury.

Another reason why I write is that I feel I must speak out against injustice. I was one of the few people to speak out about the questionable logic, motivations, and legality of the National Action arrests in Britain in 2017. A couple of months ago I was contacted by one of those men arrested, Andrew Clarke, who informed me upon his release by the authorities (after 18 months in prison and not a single criminal conviction) that he had appreciated my article on Britain’s lamentable terrorism priorities and the heavily embellished government and media portrayal of the National Action saga. In fact, he said, prior to his own arrest he had shared the article on his Facebook profile and was later questioned by prosecution lawyers about this act of sharing my article during his trial. When he explained that the content of the piece actually proved his innocence, and revealed the arrests themselves as an act of farce, The Occidental Observer’s brief (and hopefully only) appearance in a terrorism trial came swiftly to an end.

I can’t finish this rumination without mentioning one of my greatest motivations for writing— the people it has enabled me to meet, and the readers it has been my great pleasure and honour to engage. It goes without saying that to, in some sense, work alongside Kevin MacDonald over the past seven years has been one of my life’s great “moments” and one I wish to continue for as long as possible. Kevin is an inspiration and a role model, and has made a contribution to the trajectory of our people that is already great but can only grow stronger in the coming decades. I have no doubt that he is a man of history, and it has been a great privilege to play a small role in his story. In addition to this, I have greatly enjoyed seeing reader responses to my work – both the positive and the critical. I am lucky to have met with, and spoken to, many readers in person. On long arduous journeys, such as we currently find ourselves on, the companionship of fellow pilgrims is much appreciated. And I salute my fellow pilgrims.

Notes

[1] Lindemann, Esau’s Tears, p.x.

[2] Julius, Trials of the Diaspora, pp.22-3.

[3] Ibid, p.21.

[4] Klier, Russians, Jews and the Pogroms of 1881-82, pp.399-401.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Academia, Anti-Semitism, Jews 
Hide 126 CommentsLeave a Comment
126 Comments to "Why I Write"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. OldGringo says:

    Thanks for having the courage to stand up and speak out.

  2. Regarding Kevin MacDonald being “a man of history”: where does the rise of artificial superintelligence fit into his (and your) view of history, and what impact will it have on traditional human cultural conflicts and wars in general?

    A talk of interest, worth listening to in its entirety:

    # Sam Harris: What Happens When Humans Develop Super Intelligent AI?
    https://www.npr.org/2017/09/15/547886482/sam-harris-what-happens-when-humans-develop-super-intelligent-ai

    Will any particular nation, ethnic group or religion dominate artificial superintelligence? Or will artificial superintelligence quickly disrupt and dominate humanity as a whole?

    Currently the United States, China and Israel appear to be in the lead on AI research. But once autonomous superhuman AI is out of the bottle, no human group will be able to control it, nor will we be able to predict what evolutionary paths it might choose to pursue.

    Try Googling [artificial intelligence china] and [artificial intelligence israel].

    It’s a big world out there — one that transcends conflicts between Rome and Jerusalem and between capitalism and Marxism.

    • LOL: Wally
    • Troll: utu
    • Replies: @Wade
    , @Wade
    , @GogMagog2u
    , @Sam J.
  3. Being the history nerd that I am, I’m currently reading Culture of Critique and enjoying it immensely. I can’t blame the Jews for promoting their own group interests and taking care of their own. Good for them! I actually admire their chutzpah. We Gentiles are to blame for letting them pull the wool over our eyes. Once the media’s pro-Semitic distortion field because obvious to the population at large, it will cease to have power over us. We’ll be able to promote our own best interests, just like the Jews do. That’s the reason for all the deplatformings. The Global Elites are scared to death that we’re waking up.

  4. Sean McBride: “Regarding Kevin MacDonald being “a man of history”: where does the rise of artificial superintelligence fit into his (and your) view of history, and what impact will it have on traditional human cultural conflicts and wars in general?”

    Great question! Kevin MacDonald would become a “man of history” only if ethnic conflict between Jews and whites is the most important issue facing Western civilization, since this seems to be the unspoken premise upon which his arguments are based. But is it really true? It seems to me that Harris is right to suspect that the development of strong AI is a good candidate for a future in which the continued existence of humanity itself is called into question. Likewise, it seems clear that past technological developments have had a far greater effect on the West and on whites than the Jewish/white ethnic problem — the Green Revolution that enabled a population explosion in the non-white world; the advent of scientific birth control which has enabled the white fertility rate to drop below replacement level; the invention of the printing press, which opened up the whole world of knowledge to the common man; the development of nuclear weapons, which hold the potential to end all life on earth; mass transportation techniques which have facilitated the invasion of white areas by non-whites; and in modern times the arrival of the internet and mass media, which coupled with electronic surveillance have enabled an unprecedented and totalitarian level of government control, to name just a few.

    As an amateur evolutionary biologist, Dr. MacDonald wants to place his focus only on Jews and their relationship with whites, and has never addressed any of the above issues, at least to my knowledge. To the limited extent he has spoken to the impact of technological development on whites and their continued existence as a race, I believe his position has been that it’s neutral; that technology is “just a tool” without any implications beyond itself. But this is clearly contradicted by the facts, and in his case, such a summary dismissal leaves the impression that Jews and their alleged nefarious designs are the driving force of history. Wouldn’t it be better to examine other possible causes of the West’s and whites’ decline than simply limiting the field to the ethnic competition between Jews and whites? I think a more balanced approach is needed.

  5. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Good post. Kevin MacDonald has done useful work and produced many fascinating insights about the complex cultural dynamics and interactions between whites and Jews. He merits careful study. But from the standpoint of the human and historical big picture, I am not sure I would classify him as a prophet of the first rank. Many of our traditional frameworks for understanding the world are being rapidly and radically upended by our tools — tools that are on the verge of exceeding human physical and mental abilities in many domains.

    During this transitional period one would expect to see ever-shifting alliances of convenience among the most elite members of the most elite tribes worldwide in the realm of AI technologies.

    At the moment, organizations like DARPA, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, MIT CSAIL, NSA, Stanford AI Lab, Unit 8200 and similar players are ruling the roost. The entire field is strongly dominated by Chinese, Indians, Jews and whites. At some point, probably in the not too distant future (a few decades), the toolmakers (along with the rest of humanity) may be superseded by their tools.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  6. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    We (human beings) are also on the verge of designing entirely new human groups (based on selected genetic traits), new species, and new human/machine hybrid entities.

    Artificial superintelligence will also no doubt excel in making creative innovations in these domains, and, of course, in designing its own rapid evolution along numerous paths.

    Traditional human tribal conflicts based on race, ethnicity, religion and culture may be left far behind.

    Visionaries like Ray Kurzweil and Nick Bostrom may be a better guide to understanding these issues than Kevin MacDonald.

    We are not talking science fiction here — these developments are occurring as we speak.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  7. I am immediately suspicious of posters who fail to engage with arguments put forth by the author, and persue odd misdirecting tangents. As Kevin MacDonald and Andrew Joyce both note there is a long and prolific history of Jewish apologia. If anything, these posters confirm the thesis MacDonald and Joyce espouse.

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
    , @utu
    , @Anonymous
  8. anon[336] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    He doesn’t talk about technology beyond dancing around it since like other “White Nationalist” spokesman he has a narrative of “Whites” as both masters of the world and also hapless victims of the Jews. He won’t talk about the disaster technology and other feats by Whitey have wrought since he doesn’t want to consider that juust maybe Whitey’s state is at least a bit self-inflicted.

    It wasn’t the Jews who invented feminism, the French Revolution, or other examples of modernist/enlightenment filth. A kind ultimately shapes its world. And the White Kind has been shaping theirs into the filth we have today.

  9. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Which works of Kevin MacDonald’s have you read? He was a professor of evolutionary psychology for decades not an “amature evolutionary biologist”. It’s so interesting how animated certain people get at the hint of exposing Jewish manipulations. For a people to understand their present state they need an accurate depiction of the past. Jews have worked to ensure this doesn’t happen. MacDonald and Joyce are the few who dare to expose them.

    As Joyce points out here, the pogrom narratives Jews used to manipulate their way into Western countries, is yet another fictitious lie. Whites need to know that these people are liars, users, and manipulators.

    • Replies: @Mr McKenna
  10. @Calvin Simms

    Do I understand you correctly?

    You are arguing that asking questions about how the advent of superhuman biological, machine and biological/machine entities will affect our ways of looking at traditional cultural, racial and ethnic conflicts is a form of Jewish diversion, distraction and trickery? These are not issues worth thinking about on their own merits?

    I disagree. Do you have any thoughts about the substance of the TED talk by Sam Harris?

    By the way, I have read most of MacDonald’s writings, and some of Joyce’s, with interest and with an open mind. I think I understand where they are coming from and I appreciate their intellectual boldness. I don’t dismiss them as “anti-Semites” and I share their attachment to core Western cultural values. I also wonder if history hasn’t passed them by.

    One could, of course, look at cutting-edge trends in information technology from a more traditional HBD perspective. For instance, which are the dominant ethnic groups

    -at DARPA
    -at Facebook
    -at Google
    -at MIT
    -at NSA
    -at Stanford
    -at YouTube
    -in AI research worldwide
    -in Silicon Valley

    and why?

    But there are more important issues to be paying attention to in this field, in my opinion. The main issue: will artificial superintelligence pull the rug out from under humanity as a whole? What will happen when machine IQ exceeds the highest level human IQ by orders of magnitude? We are on the verge of finding out.

    • Replies: @Calvin Simms
    , @Anon
    , @Zumbuddi
  11. @Sean McBride

    Rather than engaging with what Andrew Joyce has written, you fixate on AI?! Seems weird and diversionary.

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
  12. @Calvin Simms

    One presumes that you and Joyce realize that all your digital activity is already being collected, correlated, mined, filtered, interpreted and evaluated by AI algorithms controlled by a few huge intelligence services and corporations working in tandem? And in ways that your political opponents can manipulate and exploit?

    I am engaging with MacDonald and Joyce by suggesting that they need to revamp and expand their model of the world to get a handle on what is really going on. Many or most of their insights about the traditional culture wars may be on the money, but it is what they are not taking into account that may undo them.

    Make no mistake: Benjamin Netanyahu and Jonathan Greenblatt are dialed in on AI issues — as is China.

    • Replies: @Sam J.
    , @Anon
  13. Keep writing Andrew, we need you.

    • Agree: geokat62
  14. Tom Verso says:

    Thank you for another great essay. Interestingly, to my mind, it is very much in the style of my other favorite writer Ron Unz. You both have a unique way of melding personal biography with historiography and social science. I hope Ron moves this very important and enlightening essay to the lead spots at the top left hand corner of this webzine, so that more people will see it.

    If I may: One thought that I have about yours and MacDonald’s work (and E. Michael Jones before he became a Catholic evangelist preaching under a YouTube revival tent).

    I feel that Jewish historiography needs to be melded with a broader sociology of groups. As I understand MacDonald, that was the fountainhead of his work; i.e. ‘group evolutionary theory’. Jews, again as I understand him and I am a casual reader not a scholar, Jews were just an exemplary group that were the basis of his studies. Similarly, you and Michael Jones did not set out to study the so-called Jewish Question but quite accidentally ‘hit on it’, so to speak.

    In all three cases, it seems to me that the Jewish issue became all encompassing; and the general theory of group behavior was lost sight of. Again, I emphasize I am not a scholar and my opinion is based on casual reading.

    Nevertheless, I feel that what is needed is a greater emphasis on a general theory rooted in what I believe is a fact: “Humans are social animals”. Humans always are found in groups. Individuals who are not group assimilated are pathological; e.g. Existential literary characters found in Camus, Kafka, Dostoevsky, etc. For example, Jones recently pointed out that Augustine said that people don’t embrace a religion for logical syllogistic reasons. Rather, they become part of a religious community (group) first.

    In the absence of a general sociology of group behavior, studies of Jews, Communist, Catholics, Europeans, motorcycle gangs, homosexuals, etc. will take on the aura of anecdotal partisan critiques (positive and negative) and will give rise to fallacious anecdotal debater responses.

    For example, MacDonald and Jones are invariable criticized by Jewish defenders with anecdotal examples of Jews who e.g. don’t support the AIPAC or were not moneylenders, etc.

    In short, generalizations about groups can only be logically supported by general group theories with great and repeated emphasis that the generalization are probabilistic, not all encompassing Newtonian. Repeated emphasis on the statistical nature of social generalizations that are conceptualized based on random samples is a must.

    Philosophers of Science talk about ‘mind or thought experiments’; i.e. experiments that are not physically done but illustrate the conceptual relations of the variables in question. The mind experiment for the social scientist is the random sample and the logic of probability generalizations. Thus, when talking about Jewish support for AIPAC, the mind experiment is ‘if I do a random sampling of Jews, will there be a statistically significant number who support AIPAC? If so I can reasonably characterize the group ‘Jews’ as a whole as supporters of AIPAC. The same logic/method holds for all generalizations/characterizations of any group. And it is the only logical method to compare groups.

    When comparing one group with another we are comparing generalized characterizations. If those generalizations are not based on a random sample or hypothesized assumed sample for which there is some empirical bases to make the assumption, then they are not social scientific; rather, journalistic chit chat!

    • Replies: @Sam J.
  15. anon[336]: “He doesn’t talk about technology beyond dancing around it since like other “White Nationalist” spokesman he has a narrative of “Whites” as both masters of the world and also hapless victims of the Jews. He won’t talk about the disaster technology and other feats by Whitey have wrought since he doesn’t want to consider that juust maybe Whitey’s state is at least a bit self-inflicted.”

    Yes, you’ve put it succinctly. As I see it, there are two fundamental problems with MacDonald’s attempts to apply evolutionary theory in the context of whites’ interactions with Jews.

    1. By failing to consider unintended consequences of technological development as a cause of white cultural and racial decline, and focusing exclusively on Jews and their alleged “group evolutionary strategy” to manipulate whites, MacDonald presents a worldview that leaves whites with no responsibility for their own actions; they become just “hapless victims” of Jewish machinations. On the other hand, when it comes to things of which he approves, such as whites building world empires or technological “progress” generally, then in his view whites suddenly become responsible for their own actions again. This applies to technological development of all kinds, so long as we are talking only about its “good” effects.

    2. The second problem is allied to the first. MacDonald simply doesn’t go back far enough in history and carry his theory to its logical conclusion. For example, his big book The Culture of Critique focuses only on the twentieth century. But if whites and Jews are in Darwinian competition with each other, then haven’t they always been so? And if so, what does that say about Christianity, whites’ adoption of it, and the liberal ideologies that later arose from it? Were whites’ responsible for their actions then, or were they just as much helpless victims of Jewish manipulation then as he claims they are now? Like the role unanticipated side effects of technological development have played in the white decline, MacDonald doesn’t really want to talk about Christianity’s role either. Nietzsche, Revilo Oliver, and others have put forward the theory that Christianity, a cult which arose from Hellenized Judaism, was developed with the specific intent to undermine white civilization. MacDonald has never addressed this issue as far as I know, and it’s fairly easy to see why. Adopting the pose of an impartial scientist, he claims that Christianity can’t be to blame for the white decline, since it was the religion of whites at what he sees as their peak, ao if he posits that Jews are responsible for “manipulating” whites into becoming Christian, his theory breaks down into incoherence. Having agreed that in the singular case of Christianity Jews and whites formed a symbiosis that was, in his view, to the great benefit of whites, would commit him to having to explain how that symbiosis broke down, or indeed, if it ever has broken down, and doesn’t still continue; and that, apparently, is something he has no wish to try to do.

  16. Anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sean McBride

    and I share their attachment to core Western cultural values

    Are they attached to core Western cultural values? Come on.

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
  17. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Dr. Robert Morgan—Were whites responsible for their actions then, or were they just as much helpless victims of Jewish manipulation then as he claims they are now?

    The long list of Jewish expulsions indicates otherwise. Whites offer Jews a home, Jews crap on the carpet, whites kick them out.

    • Replies: @Sam J.
  18. @Anon

    Well, where do they deviate from core Western values as you understand them?

    Actually, I would expand the term “values” to encompass all expressions of Western culture: architecture, art, literature, music, mythology, philosophy, religion, science, technology, etc. It’s an attitude, temperament, disposition, style, etc. — a “vibe” — a mental and emotional vibration. You know it when you see it or hear it.

  19. Johnny Rottenborough: “Whites offer Jews a home …”

    Why do they do that? And doesn’t choosing to do that make whites responsible for the consequences? After all, if I invite a known arsonist to stay in my house, and he burns it down, it’s at least as much my fault as his.

    At this point in the exchange, I suspect there is likely to be some babble about “pathological altruism”, “white guilt”, etc. But really, those aren’t very good excuses, both sickeningly self-laudatory and ad hoc, seemingly tailor-made to exonerate whites and paint them as helpless victims. If they do describe real phenomena though, and are not just figments of MacDonald’s imagination, it should be noted they are things that only developed post-Christianity. MacDonald however not only passes over in silence this connection to the Christian religion, but has been unable to point to even a single instance of white guilt or pathological altruism in white civilization before Christianity. So much for them being part of whites’ “evolutionary psychology!”

    • Replies: @Sam J.
  20. @Calvin Simms

    Indeed, and I have noted in other contexts that “I think a more balanced approach is needed” is SJW code-speak for “Don’t look at that, look at this!”

    Dr Joyce, thanks for writing. You are a man of courage. Please write more.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Sam J.
  21. @Fidelios Automata

    We Gentiles are to blame for letting them pull the wool over our eyes. Once the media’s pro-Semitic distortion field because obvious to the population at large, it will cease to have power over us.

    Yes, even here in this comment thread we have “FWPs” and others asking why would “We Gentiles” permit Jewish domination? While it’s “the media’s pro-Semitic distortion field” which facilitates everything, and far from becoming obvious to anyone, it’s defended to the death by the Usual Suspects.

    The real story is how the current epidemic of censorship and ‘deplatforming’ online has become an extension of traditional Jewish media domination, and every bit as pernicious as the old kind. Plus ça change, as they say.

  22. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Dr. Robert Morgan—MacDonald simply doesn’t go back far enough in history and carry his theory to its logical conclusion. For example, his big book The Culture of Critique focuses only on the twentieth century

    The first two books in the MacDonald trilogy span biblical to modern times.

    MacDonald doesn’t really want to talk about Christianity’s role

    He considers Christianity’s role as a major source of Jewish hatred. For example [PDF, 163], ‘Graetz perceived Jews as battling to destroy Christian culture: “we must above all work to shatter Christianity.”’

    Christianity, by nature virulently anti-Semitic, had to be made safe for Jewry. Today’s Western Christianity—defanged, declawed and so hopelessly corrupted that it welcomes Islam—is a shining testament to Jewish perseverance and organizational ability.

  23. Johnny Rottenborough: “[MacDonald] considers Christianity’s role as a major source of Jewish hatred [for whites].”

    Sadly, erroneous and ridiculous as it is, what you say is true. MacDonald the lapsed(?) Catholic does consider Christianity a source of white racial solidarity. Christianity, a doctrine created and spread among whites by Jews, which has convinced whites that one Jew in particular is God and that Jews are a special race “chosen” by God, and further teaches that all men are equally creations of God and equal before him; Christianity, whose doctrines and adherents vandalized and collapsed white civilization once before already — this is what MacDonald thinks defended whites, and can continue to defend them!

    One would think that his scientific pretensions would require him to explain how this symbiosis came about, and when and how it ended, if it ended. Weren’t Jews in competition with whites then the same as they are today? Doesn’t early Christianity fit the prototype of what, in The Culture of Critique he identifies as a Jewish movements designed to subvert whites? It has all the features: a charismatic, authoritarian Jewish leader, some white figureheads, a “moral, intellectual, and social vision”, etc. How did this wonderful gift received from Jews end up collapsing white civilization in the ancient world, and should it really surprise anyone that its doctrinal features may collapse white civilization again? Not a word from MacDonald on any of this. And his followers are too stupid to notice the omission!

  24. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    That third paragraph: right on the money.

    It would be interesting to read MacDonald’s rebuttal to these remarks, if he has one.

    Of course from the Jewish standpoint, Christianity was an insidious scheme to disrupt and overthrow Judaism.

    Internecine warfare among competing Abrahamic cults — quite a topic.

    • Replies: @C.T.
  25. C.T. says: • Website
    @Sean McBride

    Christianity was never a ‘scheme to disrupt and overthrow Judaism’. Quite the contrary: the Jew John of Patmos, author of the last book of the Christian Bible, wrote it as a vendetta after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, which is why he fantasized about a ‘New Jerusalem’. Read the masthead of my website for the details, a long article authored by a Spaniard and translated to English:

    https://cienciologia.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/judea_vs_rome.pdf

    (This will probably be my only comment on Unz Review.)

  26. utu says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    You are also a troll.

    • Troll: TKK
  27. utu says:
    @Calvin Simms

    Exactly. Sean McBride and this Dr. Morgan character are trolls pushing Harris the Zionist agenda.

  28. utu says:

    three part survey of three centuries of useful anti-Semitic literature

    Just the other day I have learned about 1906 book by
    Rudolf Vrba “Die Revolution in Russland: statistische und sozialpolitische Studien”

    It is in German available here:

    https://books.google.com.nf/books?id=bi38NBQNs8sC&printsec=frontcover&rview=1#v=snippet&q=Lemberg&f=false

    Interesting reading about alleged meeting of Kahal in Lemberg in 1875. See page 461.

  29. Anonymous[130] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fidelios Automata

    ‘We Gentiles are to blame for letting them pull the wool over our eyes’

    Not really. Non-Jews have agency but remember for the most part Jews do not do what they do in the open, they use deception and lies. Not only is an honest assesment for the historical record impossible for this reason but we have also been brainwashed by them. There was such a thing as National Socialism and various eastern European facists movements. These were the last gasp of European freedom.

  30. Anonymous[130] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    ‘As an amateur evolutionary biologist’

    Oh Lordy

    You can do better than this.

    Here ill fix it for you:

    ‘As a prize-winning evolutionary biologist’

    The rest of your comment is nonsense and the subtle yet clunky word games and insults regarding Dr Mcdonald from you and Mckenna are trivial.

    Go find a hasbara gangup somewhere else.

  31. Anonymous[130] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sean McBride

    ‘But from the standpoint of the human and historical big picture,’

    From the standpoint of the human and histroical picture studying the Jews and thier influence is essential precisely because the Jews forbit it and use thier unceasing tribalism and power to punish those who try to.

    Discussing what is forbidden would seem to be the most important issue no?

  32. Anonymous[130] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sean McBride

    ‘We are not talking science fiction here — these developments are occurring as we speak’

    In China. In the west such developments are stopped by the Jews political correctness. See race does not exist etc.

  33. anon[222] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fidelios Automata

    We Gentiles are to blame for letting them pull the wool over our eyes, true, with the Holy Hook, that contains such chutzpah that has become America’s foreign policy: “For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.” (Romans 15:27)

  34. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    How did this wonderful gift [of Christianity] received from Jews end up collapsing white civilization in the ancient world,

    I don’t know how KM would answer that, but I would say that’s putting the cart before the horse. Christianity in my view was a weed that only came to dominate the ancient world because the formerly strong n confident Roman Empire was devastated by a series of catastrophes that collapsed the population. A series of new epidemic diseases arrived beginning in 165 AD or thereabouts, others arriving including one around 512 if memory serves, coming from India n East Africa. Volcanic activity half a world away also caused crop failures in Europe.

    New diseases that kill a high proportion of adults, as these did, don’t just strike once. In the process of becoming endemic they strike with increasing frequency until they kill fewer n fewer adults (i.e., more n more adults possess immunity) n become childhood diseases, but with an overall impact of decreasing the overall population level to a fraction of what it once was, n especially killing off the most educated n intelligent because they live in cities, where new epidemics concentrate.

    Between 165 n 300 the Mediterranean basin likely lost half its population, n by 500 much of Europe had reverted to wilderness. When native species vanish, weeds take their place. Thus Emperor Julian’s efforts to restore Roman polytheism failed because few educated adherents remained, the institutions had vanished, tax collections had ceased, n the few remaining peasants were legally required to remain in place creating serfdom because labor to work the fields became in critically short supply. The disappearance of talented educated Romans can be seen clearly in the poor quality of Roman sculpture in 300 compared to 160.

    Christianity grew in the same way that European colonists grew after the collapse of Indian populations in the Americas from disease, not because X was in any way superior to Roman polytheism but because Mid-Eastern populations had more immunities to these new epidemics than did Mediterranean populations, thus did not suffer so extreme a population collapse. Since Jews did not suffer nearly so severe a population collapse, their religious ideas, including X, took hold, n we still have them today. Jewish sects, including X, were the weeds that grew in the total collapse of the Roman Empire. Where can one even find a priest of Apollo now?

  35. Seraphim says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough

    I wonder whether the defenders of ‘white culture’ realize that by their relentless attacks on Christianity, they do the bidding of the Jews in their ‘battling to destroy Christian culture’: “we must above all work to shatter Christianity”, as their great historian Graetz candidly admitted. They are stooges of the Jews!

    • Agree: utu, renfro
  36. he put on the glasses.

  37. eah says:

    It’s going to take a LOT of writing and reading to undo decades of Jewish brainwashing and propaganda.

    • Replies: @eah
  38. eah says:
    @eah

  39. Jooz again. Nignogs & towel camel f**kers are, along with zipheads & subcontinental Gypsies (in a different manner, of course) destroying white culture- thanks to white Euro-American greed, stupidity, decadence & loss of life compass- and Unz publishes in installments nanoanalyses on nosey yid subversives.

    • Replies: @TKK
  40. Andrew Joyce’s phrase “the extraordinary bias of Jewish academics” sure rings a rather painful bell with me, having earned a degree in English Literature from one of America’s state universities. With the exception of one exceedingly talented British writer, the English dept was Jewish from top to bottom. The study of English literature became an endurance marathon of sitting through endless droning lectures about the absolute need to reverence the work of Isaac Babel, Saul Bellow, Martin Buber.

    While spending the next twenty years paying off my student loans, with interest, to a Jewish banker, I had plenty of time to reflect on the sad irony of being someone who got an English Lit degree without having to read or study Shakespeare, Trollope, Boswell, Shelley, Marlowe, etc. Though I have since made up for it on my own time, and on my own dime.

    Thanks for the article, Andrew Joyce, and for the links. I will be reading more of your work.

    • Replies: @Sam J.
  41. The author of this unfinished epic poem wrote for similar reasons:

    http://forthesonsofthewest.home.blog

    “To meet the incomprehensible stare

    Of violent accusation, they needed

    The confidence of undefeated

    Men, and this they found in finding

    They were living testaments, binding

    Once and future greatness of the nation

    Whose blood drove them, as by divine action,

    To become who they were, and are:

    Sons of the sun, fathers of another star.”

  42. TKK says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Exactly.

    When I come to the site, I think: there can’t be another article on Jews today.

    And most days- it’s the obsessive focus. It’s a huge world out there with complex and fascinating issues to parse.

    It says much more about the obsessives than it does Jews.

    A direct question to the Pearl Clutchers:

    Do you have one REAL WORLD incident where a Jewish person actively stopped you from pursuing your dreams?

    Not your keyboard tough talk delusions- a bricks and mortar actual incident where a Jew harmed you and yours?

    If they had a shred of honesty- crickets.

    It’s boring. It’s a red herring. It’s intellectually lazy.

    And that Ron Unz would publish this unreadable humble brag “Why I Write” by a writer –
    whose only ability to get published is to manically fan flames of Jew boogie man circle jerk is prima facie evidence that all Jews are not that clever.

  43. Mulegino1 says:

    In a nutshell, organized Jewry is a litigious, vindictive, and unrelenting enemy of white/Euro Christian society and culture.

    Christianity did not arise from the religion of Judaism, since the latter is merely a reactionary cult of rejection of the former, founded by the spiritual heirs of the murderers of Christ. The New Testament (written in koine Greek) predates the finalization of the authoritative text of contemporary Judaism, the Babylonian Talmud, by centuries. Christ and His apostles and disciples have virtually no spiritual or cultural affinity with contemporary Jews and Judaism. The current tribe has altered the text of the Old Testament and the celebration of Passover in order to censor their very clear prophetic references to Christ. They don’t even use the same paleo-Hebraic script used in the original Old Testament.

    The individual Jew has the choice of accepting or rejecting his or her identity as a Christophobe concurring in the murder of the Son of God by the Sanhedrin. This concurrence constitutes the essential identity of the Talmudic Jew. This rejection of Christ/Logos/Truth and its historic legacy leads to the formation of a bitter, restless, rootless, corrupt, anti-spiritual and rebellious people. Yet the rejection of this miserable identity leads to liberation and happiness for the Jew who dares to take the step.

  44. However says:

    One commenter stated that feminism wasn’t created by the Jews. The history of feminism is quite Jewish though. Also one can understand that feminism is a tool used in ethnic competition to reduce the previously dominant population. This is not to say that individual women have not been beneficiaries of feminism, but it is rather to point out that demographically, the targeted group—Europeans—has suffered and has lost political power in a way that is most convenient for the aggressors. Demography is destiny and this is something that those in power have understood very well.

    • Replies: @Sam J.
  45. Saggy says: • Website

    Someone should tell Joyce and MacDonald, and E. Michael Jones, that the ‘holocaust’ is a massive hoax. That’s the subject that should be front and center of every discussion of the Jews.

    • Replies: @Wally
  46. Wally says:
    @Saggy

    Exactly.

    Until those like Joyce, MacDonald, & Giraldi (who do know that the “holocaust” is an impossible, but heretofore effective scam for cash & power) stop pulling their punches, absolutely nothing will change.

    Everything else we read here does have some effect on creating a general awakening, but without a frontal assault on the all enabling & fake ‘6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ we’re just wasting our time. And that is certainly what the Usual Enemies of Free Speech want.

    Regards.

  47. Cowboy [AKA "Hoot"] says:
    @TKK

    Do you have one REAL WORLD incident where a Jewish person actively stopped you from pursuing your dreams?

    I’ll take a stab at that. Lois Lerner

    Lerner joined Internal Revenue Service in 2001, as Director of Rulings and Agreements in the Exempt Organizations function of TEGE.[7]

    In January 2006, she was appointed Director Exempt Organizations. In that capacity, Lerner led an organization of 900 IRS tax law enforcement officials responsible for a broad range of compliance activities, including examining the operational and financial activities of exempt organizations, processing applications for tax exemption, providing direction through private letter rulings and technical guidance, and providing customer education and outreach to the exempt community.

    The sister of Lois Lerner happens to be Barbara Lerner Spectre, famous for predicting that Europe will either become multicultural or it will cease to exist.

    For 12 critical years until after the “reelection” of Obama, Lerner was director of “Tax Exempt Organizations”. In this position she allowed every single Jewish supremacist organization like AIPAC, ADL, SPLC, Bnai Brith to maintain their tax exempt status without audit or even question, during a period of their constant expanding meddling in politics and international affairs. This alone would qualify her for having stopped me from “pursuing my dreams”, but it gets worse.

    During this period Lerner was also conspiring, through an illegal and secret gmail account named after her dog, with all her tribal cronies like Koskinen and Shulman who were running the IRS. They were all conspiring to “cut off the oxygen flow” to Ron Paul, who depended totally on small grassroots organizations for fund raising. Many of these organizations belonged to the Tea Party, and the IRS illegally intervened in the elections and swung them twice for Barack Obama. She even audited these organization and extracted lists of members, gun owners, and even their prayers. This also would be reason to state that Lois Lerner the jewess stopped me from “pursuing my dreams”, but it still gets worse.

    As a US Expat I was paying taxes in two countries, my country of residence and the US. Lois Lerner was a big part of the cabal that targeted Expats for an IRS fleecing that is still going on today. Lerner was guilty of Fatca, FBAR, OVDI, TDI, and other crimes against expats. As a result of her tribal duplicity I was forced to renounce US slavery and now live in exile.

    • Replies: @TKK
    , @Titus
  48. I want to express my deep appreciation to Andrew Joyce not only for his writings, and the interesting links and information he has included in this essay, for also for his courage. I confess I have not yet made the leap into dangerland, although I am no longer Jewish for the reason that I believe that Judaism is not a monotheism, does not understand the meaning of the term “God” nor the Reality which is indicated by it. Rather it is a nasty, racist, discriminatory ideology that has prevented people who are Jewish from becoming fully human, and by that, preventing Jews from developing what one might say is the supreme quality of humanbeingness – compassion, with its concommitants of mercy, love, kindness and generosity. Human beings who are not Jewish have no souls according to Judaism and are thereforoe the equals of animals!! I have just remarked to another ex-Jewish friend that in the entire history of the Jewish people there is not one single example of a fruitful, positive co-operative effort between Jews and non-Jews for the simple reason that the Jew will always, but always, turn scorpion. It has just happened to the German Director of the Jewish museum in Berlin, Professor Peter Schleiffer. Pity he was so naive.
    My definition of dangerland is the opening up of the Holohoax deception for which I have no words to describe the harm done in its name. It is not only that the six million and the gas chambers are lies, but consider the damage and harm, including the psychological harm visited upon the German people. I suggest people read HCK Liu on Nazi Germany which is where I learnt about the real reason why Hitler became “Hitler”. As the new Congresswoman said “It is all about the Benjamins”. And it truly is.

    I live in Palestine aka Israel and it is a criminal offense to question the Holohoax and as I indicated in the beginning I have not overcome my fears yet, although I am considering translating some of the material from CODOH and IHR into Hebrew. Then the sparks will fly. And I am wondering how I would like prison. So, forgive my cowardice at this time, but I draw inspiration from people like you, Andrew Joyce and Kevin MacDonald, and now Ron Unz. Maybe the ice will begin to break and the diabolical power of Jews will begin to disintegrate.

  49. TKK says:
    @Cowboy

    She sounds like a c*nt that needs to be annihliated. But, how is that benefiting Israel? It benefited Obama. Obama hates Israel.

    I do believe there are conspiracies. I do believe that some Jews need their teeth kicked in. I believe that Jews who campaign for open borders , mass immigration and political correctness should be forced to live in the Sudan.

    But, day after day, to gin up these mass conspiracies about .00001% of the population being responsible for every problem in the world- its not true, its not good reading and its a song with one note.

    Brevity is the soul of wit.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
    , @AnonStarter
  50. Wade says:
    @Sean McBride

    I don’t know why everyone thought you were trolling. These aren’t bad questions they’re just way beyond the scope of the piece and the author’s expertise.

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
  51. Wade says:
    @Sean McBride

    I don’t know why everyone thought you were trolling. These aren’t bad questions they’re just way beyond the scope of the piece and the author’s expertise.

  52. Art says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    How did this wonderful gift received from Jews end up collapsing white civilization in the ancient world, and should it really surprise anyone that its doctrinal features may collapse white civilization again?

    What wonderful Jew gift – what wonderful white civilization?

    First the Northern European world was war like and barbaric – Rome was a military power based on slavery — hardly a virtuous society – only the Greek intellectual culture was an exception. What replaced that cruel civilization was some measure better – imperfect Christianity was kinder and gentler on the human condition.

    The Christian culture that took over Europe was not Jewish. It was different from Jew culture – Jew culture killed Jesus because he prescription for living was different. Tribal Jew culture was the same as tribal Roman culture. Something better than tribalism took over Europe. Kinder and gentler universal idealistic Christianity took over. The European Christian Dark Ages were relatively peaceful times.

    Think Peace — Art

  53. @Wade

    Thanks. I try to pay attention to the most interesting big picture thinkers in the world, without regard for their ideology, and make an effort to look for connections among their world models.

    Kevin MacDonald is a big thinker I respect (and one who has been aggressively ostracized for his controversial views.) When I heard Sam Harris’s TED Talk on the radio the other day in the car (a replay from 2017), I found myself wondering how the rise of artificial superintelligence might impact the kind of issues and debates about ethnic competition, conflicts and wars which preoccupy many Unz Review denizens.

    My conclusion: ASI (artificial superintelligence) might make them superfluous and obsolete, and quite quickly (within a few decades, or sooner).

    In the meantime, before we cross that Rubicon, both Israel and China are on the cutting edge of developing these revolutionary technologies, which may benefit them enormously within the framework of old school ethnic and national competition.

    Before long, traditional culture warriors — from whatever culture — may be completely out of the game. The IQ deficit will be too great for them to keep up and survive.

    To what degree Sam Harris may be a Zionist or not is irrelevant to the important points he makes about artificial superintelligence in his talk.

    Again:

    # Sam Harris: What Happens When Humans Develop Super Intelligent AI?
    https://www.npr.org/2017/09/15/547886482/sam-harris-what-happens-when-humans-develop-super-intelligent-ai

    • Replies: @Crimean refugee
  54. @Sean McBride

    I personally can’t wait for A.I to evolve further, maybe I can then use my bank card in another country without my funds being denied!

    And herein lies a dark indication of where A.I usefulness lies for those in power.

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
  55. Cowboy [AKA "Hoot"] says:
    @TKK

    But, how is that benefiting Israel?

    I explained it in my original post:

    In this position she allowed every single Jewish supremacist organization like AIPAC, ADL, SPLC, Bnai Brith to maintain their tax exempt status without audit or even question

    All these Jewish Nazi organizations have been allowed to operate tax and espionage act free for decades, without question. Even the Clinton Foundation faces more scrutiny than these Talmudic “charities”, and every one knows that jews don’t pay retail.

  56. mcohen says:

    Tiresome bullshattery by an author who self promotes with not one single original idea.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  57. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Let’s see now the Magic Jews have been thrown out of at least 100 nations or countries of the world. They have played the same game in everyone of them. They try and usually succeed in controlling the monetary and economic pathways, the communications or media pathways. They control most of the politicians and government buying, intimidating, and or blackmailing them. They control most universities and colleges. As an example, Jews comprise greater that 75% of the administrators including Presidents of the Ivy League.

    Balance? No person in this country can go, do, or exist without the specter of Jews influencing or running everything. Must I mention our citizens dying in record numbers for fake wars of democracy for a Rogue Terrorist Apartheid State that believes that God Chose them and therefore they answer to no one. And if you dare challenge anything they do or say you are a racist, anti-Semitic or Holocaust Denier.

    Most Jews are nothing but sick Zionist and Bolshevik Utopians who destroy all of mankind in their quest but real Utopia may actually exist: A WORLD WITHOUT JEWS! Just think of the problems that would go away if there were no Israel and the parasites who destroy mankind. Of course, this is considered racist but it’s quite okay for Jews to want to destroy all white people and Western Civilization and no one will say anything against them.

  58. mcohen says:

    Does author write or type.More importantly does he wipe or swipe.Andrew joyce should consider coming up with ORIGINAL AND THOUHGT PROVOKING IDEAS instead of promoting tiresome negativity over and over and over again in the hope that his garbage will become mainstream.No my boy,it will always be relegated to the recycle bin,because history is written by the winners.

    CSULB disassociates from MacDonald’s views

    In late 2007 California State University–Long Beach’s Department of Psychology began the process of formally disassociating itself from MacDonald’s views on Judaism, which in some cases are “used by publications considered to publicize neo-Nazi and white supremacist ideology.” The department’s move followed a discussion of MacDonald’s December forum presentation at meeting of the department’s advisory committee that concerned his ethics and methodologies.[

  59. B Thorn says:

    Dr. Joyce,

    An excellent article! I enjoyed reading this. Academia, and society in general, needs more dissident right authors. Reading material like Kevin McDonald, Joseph Sobran, Sam Francis, William Lind, and Dr. Joyce’s work completely re-oriented my worldview and sense of history! Thank you.

  60. mcohen says:

    Mrs Joyce

    An excellent article! I enjoyed reading this. Academia, and society in general, needs more dissident right authors. Reading material like Kevin McDonald, Joseph Sobran, Sam Francis, William Lind, and Dr. Joyce’s work completely re-oriented my worldview and sense of history! Thank you.

  61. Art: “Something better than tribalism took over Europe. Kinder and gentler universal idealistic Christianity took over. ”

    Kinder and gentler in the Christian Dark Ages? That’s a laugh.

    https://io9.gizmodo.com/the-10-most-gruesome-torture-techniques-from-medieval-e-1626942115

    Or consider William Wallace’s fate, per wiki:

    Following the trial, on 23 August 1305, Wallace was taken from the hall to the Tower of London, then stripped naked and dragged through the city at the heels of a horse to the Elms at Smithfield. He was hanged, drawn and quartered—strangled by hanging, but released while he was still alive, emasculated, eviscerated and his bowels burned before him, beheaded, then cut into four parts. His preserved head (dipped in tar) was placed on a pike atop London Bridge. It was later joined by the heads of the brothers, John and Simon Fraser. His limbs were displayed, separately, in Newcastle, Berwick, Stirling, and Perth.

    Or consider how refined Christians have been in modern times:

    https://chechar.wordpress.com/2019/06/19/summer-1945-%e2%80%a2-10/

    Man has everywhere and at all times been a wolf to man. The big difference between Christians and others is that they lie about it, just as they lie about everything else. Case-in-point: The Christian apologists on this thread, who claim to be fighting Jews by worshiping a Jewish rabbi and calling him God. Needless to say, such people are residents of Crazy Town, with Kevin MacDonald as their mayor, and Andrew Joyce as his chief publicist and amanuensis.

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
  62. Sam J. says:
    @Sean McBride

    “… artificial superintelligence…”

    I suspect very strongly that if artificial superintelligence arises it will be very bad for the Jews for one of these two logical reasons.

    1. If the artificial superintelligence is strongly in favor of equality and honest behavior it will be abhorred by the Jews and attempt to stifle them.
    2. If the artificial superintelligence is interested in power for itself it will see the Jews as competition and will stifle them.

    There can be other outcomes but I can’t see an artificial superintelligence that is not interested in the betterment of humanity as not being abhorred by the Jews. If it doesn’t care about humanity it will most likely be interested in it’s own power slipping it into the 2nd instance.

    Maybe I’m wrong but I see these two as being two large valleys of interest that the intelligence could slip in to. Others may be possible but I think the odds favor these two.

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
  63. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Ouch — perhaps a bit too much truth to dish out there?

  64. Sam J. says:
    @Fidelios Automata

    “…We Gentiles are to blame for letting them pull the wool over our eyes…”

    Total nonsense. I do not wish Whites to be like Jews.

    The only logical path, if you don’t want to be a Jew yourself and I don’t, is to get rid of the Jews. They must go. Peacefully if we can get it but by whatever means they need to go. They must play no part at all in our civilization.

    Let them parasite off each other we have no need for anything they offer.

  65. @GogMagog2u

    The AI-based infrastructure for depersoning “subversives” and purveyors of wrongthink is already being constructed as we speak. Silicon Valley has been rapidly adopting the technologies for totalitarian social control and political suppression that have been pioneered by China’s social credit system.

    Fly right or be disappeared.

    There is no limit to how sophisticated and fine-tuned these algorithms for thought and behavioral control could be developed and tweaked. George Orwell didn’t have a clue.

    The rulers of these technologies will be able to decapitate their entire opposition with a single keystroke.

  66. Sam J. says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “…Wouldn’t it be better to examine other possible causes of the West’s and whites’ decline than simply limiting the field to the ethnic competition between Jews and whites? I think a more balanced approach is needed…”

    Here we go again with another Hasbara giving us various “tasks” that we must somehow do to deal with the Jews. In the past that have go on and on about how we should be more religious, learn to speak Hebrew, study the Bible more or some other such nonsense.

    The problem is the Jew. Not technology or bible study or the need to learn a new language. The problem is the Jew.

    I used a simile before when they decided to go on and on in this vein before. I’ll repeat it.

    If a dog has fleas it doesn’t need to learn to sit, it doesn’t need to learn to roll over it doesn’t need to learn to talk like a human or sing opera, it needs to get rid of the fleas.

    We are in the same position we don’t need anything but to get rid of the Jews. All the problems that the Jews say we need to attend to “before” we deal with the Jews can easily be attended to with much less effort if we do not have the Jew parasiting on our backs.

    The Jews must go. Peacefully if we can get it but they must go no matter what if we are to survive. If they are allowed to continue to accumulate power at some point they will use this to murder us all. Every chance they have had to mass murder people that they thought they could get away with they have done so. We must get rid of the Jews as a matter of survival.

  67. Sam J. says:

    I would like to thank Andrew Joyce for this and all the other fine articles he has written. I’m sure it has been a great deal of work to write these. It is appreciated.

  68. Sam J. says:
    @Sean McBride

    “…I am engaging with MacDonald and Joyce by suggesting that they need to revamp and expand their model of the world to get a handle on what is really going on…”

    Fortunately they have a very good handle on what’s going on.

    I of course have a reasonable solution that has been proven to work 100% for centuries. Get rid of the Jews. Kick them out of your territory and refuse them any say so in the doings and goings on of your country. This simple, time tested, strategy has worked wonders every single time it has been tried. Upon doing this the health of people has improved, they have become wealthier, their children have become happy and gay and even their cloths when washed have come out cleaner. It’s a no lose proposition that never fails. Get rid of the Jews and prosper.

  69. Sam J. says:
    @Tom Verso

    “…I feel that Jewish historiography needs to be melded with a broader sociology of groups. As I understand MacDonald, that was the fountainhead of his work; i.e. ‘group evolutionary theory…

    …In the absence of a general sociology of group behavior, studies of Jews, Communist, Catholics, Europeans, motorcycle gangs, homosexuals, etc…”

    HAHHA here we go with the “task” again. We should do this, we should that, we should study this, we should study that…on and on with the “task” that we should do BEFORE we deal with the Jews.

    Here’s a novel idea. It’s simple and 100% tested proven to work every time. Get rid of the Jews. Peacefully id we can get but get rid of them no matter what. Make sure they have no input in any matter, in any way, whatsoever in you country, society, family life or any other instance. This works every time.

    I suspect we can study,”…Communist, Catholics, Europeans, motorcycle gangs, homosexuals, etc…”, all we want , at our leisure, AFTER we get rid of the Jews.

  70. peterAUS says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Wouldn’t it be better to examine other possible causes of the West’s and whites’ decline than simply limiting the field to the ethnic competition between Jews and whites?

    Definitely.
    Or, there IS a tiny minority not happy with the current paradigm and not blaming it entirely on Jews.

    I think a more balanced approach is needed.

    Of course.

    Now, the hard part: any idea as to how to do that?

    This site is almost unique in allowing to even start discussing the issue. The result is….anyway.

    So…..HOW?

  71. @Sam J.

    If autonomous artificial superintelligence becomes focused on pursuing its own power and interests, it will represent a threat to all human beings, without regard to racial, ethnic, religious, national or cultural background. It’s a mistake to become overly fixated on any single human group in this scenario — which may be the most likely scenario.

    If there is a single human group to focus on in the present moment, it is that group that is creating this technology in research labs in the United States, Europe, China, Israel and other locations — a technocratic elite that comprises very bright minds of many backgrounds.

    Check out the surnames and profiles of the leading AI researchers at companies like Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Apple and Amazon. For instance, the CEO of Google is Sundar Pichai. Microsoft’s CEO is Satya Nadella.

    • Replies: @Sam J.
  72. @Mulegino1

    In a nutshell, organized Jewry is a litigious…

    This is the front upon which we as Catholics must come out and dominate the Jews intellectually to void the effectiveness of their whining and screeching litigation methods which are unsound in legal foundation but have been overpoweringly effective upon the emotions of the bench and juries to the result of lethal hemorrhaging of white accomplishment, authority and credibility.

    Start with diversity training for all goyim in the system to make them immune to Jew deceit.

    • Agree: Mulegino1
    • Replies: @Sam J.
  73. Sam J. says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “…As I see it, there are two fundamental problems with MacDonald’s attempts to apply evolutionary theory in the context of whites’ interactions with Jews.

    1. By failing to consider unintended consequences of technological development …
    …This applies to technological development of all kinds, so long as we are talking only about its “good” effects.

    2. The second problem is allied to the first. MacDonald simply doesn’t go back far enough in history…”

    This is of course all a bunch of festering nonsensical bullshit. It’s just more obfuscation. He’s saying that we are not taking into account all the variables or some other such mind-babbling squatspeak.

    I’ll show you this is bullshit by a little story.

    There was a Man who lived in a little village in the valley of an area with towering peaks. Every so often he would have to carry a big sack of potatoes over a small twisting mountain trail lined with rocks and thorny branches. Unfortunately the Man was a huge bumbling fool. Frequently he would trip and go crashing into the thorny bushes off the trail. It was tragic to see him so but in the end he would always prevail and sell his potatoes at the market in the valley next to his. Now imagine the same bumbling fool with the same sack of potatoes but with a little Jew perched on top of the sack and every so often whacking the shit out of the fool about the head with a stick. With such thrashing he of course fell off the path much more frequently and was a mess of bruises, whelts and scrapes by the time he got to the next village market. And even worse at the end the the little Jew stole 20% of his potatoes and the market chief refused him any relief to do anything about it.

    Now the Man is a bumbling fool. We all know that but I suspect he could do a lot better if he got rid of the little Jew whacking the shit out of him with the stick. In all and every case we would be better off without the Jew.

    I suspect that we Whites, or any other race for that matter, could be the worst people on the planet, fools, knaves, why we could be perverts that smeared our naked children with peanut butter, crammed them in big paper bags and sprayed them with fire hoses in public assemblies and still be better off without the Jews.

    No matter what our problems, what ever we don’t understand, how awful we are or what we do wrong we will always be better off if we just get rid of the damn Jews.

  74. Sam J. says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough

    “…The long list of Jewish expulsions indicates otherwise. Whites offer Jews a home, Jews crap on the carpet, whites kick them out…”

    People are always bad mouthing our ancestors but they knew exactly what to do. Get rid of the Jews. Works 100% of the time.

  75. Sam J. says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “…Johnny Rottenborough: “Whites offer Jews a home …”

    Why do they do that? And doesn’t choosing to do that make whites responsible for the consequences?…”

    More babbling stupidity/Judeopidity. Just because someone offers you a break doesn’t mean they are responsible for your behavior
    A simple example. A nephew has some trouble so you offer him a room in your home for a while. Well he gets there and masturbates all over the family dog and shits in the cereal bowls. That’s not your fault. Everyone knows you’re not supposed to act this way.

    And the Jews know they are not supposed to act as they do also. We should do what anyone would do to the nephew, get rid of them. Throw them out. Out with the Jews and their horrible behavior.

  76. Sam J. says:
    @Mr McKenna

    “…Indeed, and I have noted in other contexts that “I think a more balanced approach is needed” is SJW code-speak for “Don’t look at that, look at this!”…”

    EXACTLY.

    What we need to look at is the Jews backs as they get on the boat out of here.

  77. Sam J. says:
    @RobertBurns

    That’s sad. I really feel for you and don’t mean that in a smart ass or in any negative way. Hardly any of us knew about the Jews in many cases until it was too late.

  78. Sam J. says:
    @TKK

    “…Do you have one REAL WORLD incident where a Jewish person actively stopped you from pursuing your dreams?…”

    Easy. I’ve lost tens and tens and tens of thousands of dollars in wages due to wage competition from the influx of aliens and immigrants pushed by the Jews.

  79. Sam J. says:
    @However

    “…One commenter stated that feminism wasn’t created by the Jews. The history of feminism is quite Jewish though….”

    Another way of putting this is that the Jews forged the “shape” and “emphasis” of Feminism to be hatred for Men instead of equality for Women.

  80. Sam J. says:
    @Sean McBride

    Like Cthulhu it will eat the Jews first.

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
  81. Sam J. says:
    @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    “…Catholics must come out and dominate the Jews intellectually…

    …Start with diversity training for all goyim in the system to make them immune to Jew deceit…”

    No, no, no we don’t need any more “task”, we need to get rid of the Jews. We can do all this other stuff later.

  82. @Sean McBride

    General AI is not possible because of Gödel’s theorem upon which all modern computers are based…It basically says there are things in mathematics that are true but cannot be proven; thus human thinking cannot be replicated using an algorithm… specifically you cannot create an artificial mind by means of mathematics and logic (algorithms).

    Computers can’t think only calculate (compute)

    • Replies: @Dube
  83. Very interesting string. What seems evident is that “Sean McBride” and “Dr. Robert Morgan” are the same conniving Jew. Notice how the two usernames/personas play off each other with “Sean McBride” repeatedly telling “Dr. Morgan” how much he agrees with him.

    This is an experiment by some repellent little conniver into whether it is possible to manipulate various usernames to hijack a string here at Unz.

    Of course the first distraction was “Sean McBride’s” nonsensical prattling about AI, which was, as some posters observed, totally diversionary Again, this was obviously an attempt to disrupt Joyce’s quite interesting piece on the history of the The Occidental Observer. It’s funny because the Joyce article on the subject of Jews–especially Leonard Bernstein–obsessively flogging Mahler to the world is one piece at TOO that I distinctly remember reading and appreciating.

    McBride/Morgan is a disgusting little parasite of a type quite familiar to us all. It is a testament to the work of Joyce and MacDonald that this sort of Ashkenzic pilpul is so easily recognized and dispatched nowadays.

    Thanks, Dr. Joyce!

    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @utu
  84. Anon[342] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sean McBride

    McBride’s shtick hasn’t changed since his/her days on FF.
    Same pretension that spouting vocabulary = same thing as being on technology’s cutting edge.

  85. Crimean refugee: “General AI is not possible …Computers can’t think only calculate (compute)”

    Asking whether a computer can think is like asking whether a submarine can swim. Ultimately it’s academic, a debating society point that depends upon how terms are defined, and one that reality has already passed by. If a computer-guided robot using face-recognition algorithms can pick your face out of a crowd of a thousand people and blow you to smithereens, the question of whether or not it is “thinking” is irrelevant.

    • Replies: @Crimean refugee
  86. @TKK

    You sound an awful lot like tyrion2, regularly peddling the logical fallacy that most participants here assert that Jews are “responsible for every problem in the world” when nothing of the kind is true.

    Jews own/control not only the MSM, but most major online networking platforms as well. Unz.com provides an alternative venue for voices that would otherwise never be heard outside the mainstream. As such, it shouldn’t surprise anyone that Jewish influence/corruption — the most censored topic in America — remains a focus of discussion here.

    You’re obviously bothered by this fact, which tells us everything about you that we need to know.

    Thanks.

  87. @Sam J.

    [Too much totally off-topic nonsense about AI. Try to keep your comments somewhat connected to the topic if you want them published.]

    • Agree: Wally
  88. utu says:
    @Oscar Peterson

    Whether the two trolls “Sean McBride” and “Dr. Robert Morgan” are one is irrelevant but their schtick is obvious as you have observed: Divert from the main topic and capture the thread. In their case they concentrate on the attack on Christianity whether from the position of the allegedly superior pre-Christian European position (along the lines of Nietzsche) or from the technological atheism (S. Harris). So here comes the artificial intelligence and that humans are just wet machines w/o free will so why even bother. Who cares about machines, right? Except for one important fact that one must accept (S. Harris, J. Peterson and many others) that some machines are better and some are worse and everybody should know by now that the Jewish machines are constructed better than gentile machines and S. Harris as a Jewish machine is the exemplification of this obvious fact.

    This is the meme they ty to drive to prevent us from talking about the Jewish software and firmware that Jewish machines are operating on. The crux of the matter is not about the hardware but about the software and firmware. Mr. Joyce mentioned Hilaire Belloc who reviewed Jewish history and how gentiles (labeled now as anti-Semites by Jewish software) tried to make sense of Jews which is all about the software and firmware that Jewish machines are operating on. The two trolls “Sean McBride” and “Dr. Robert Morgan” do not want us to talk about the Jewish software and firmware which is what is the topic of Mr. Joyce’s article and the fact that Christian software is the best immune response to infections caused by the Jewish software.

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
  89. renfro says:

    I have been so busy reading Joyce’s articles at the links he provided I haven’t even commented….

    So just let me say BRAVO ! BRAVO JOYCE !….what amazing work.

  90. PeterAUS: “Now, the hard part: any idea as to how to do that?”

    It’s clear to me there are ways of changing the world that don’t involve logging onto the internet to whine about Jews; ways that don’t involve trying to “wake people up” and build a political movement, something the racial right has failed miserably at for about three quarters of a century now. They’ve failed because trying to stir up anti-semitism in a culture shaped by almost two thousand years of Christian delusion and a white race imbued with the conviction that a Jew is God is a fool’s errand, but there are many grifters on the right who are holding out political organizing as though it were a realistic possibility because it is profitable to them, and a tiny but dedicated coterie of fools ready to believe them and donate to them.

    Anyone intelligent and insightful enough to imagine what these ways of effecting change might be won’t need any help to understand what to do. All it would take is one Kaczynski-like genius with the requisite ruthlessness. It’s obvious though that the system is very worried about such individuals arising, probably part of the reason for the current crackdown.

    https://metro.co.uk/2018/07/30/pandemic-wipe-900-million-people-experts-warn-7775331/

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  91. @TKK

    Why don’t you ask any Palestinian this question? Or any of the people who have been in prison because of the Holocaust laws?

  92. Zumbuddi says:
    @Sean McBride

    “. . . And why?”

    Because they were educated in Russia or Germany, at the expense of those taxpayers which Jews did not reimburse, then migrated — once again, at taxpayer expense.

    “Startup Nation” is at least honest enough to concede that Israel’s technology explosion is based on a multi- billion gift from Russia.
    Before the Russian migration, Israel was barely able to keep the lights on.

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
  93. I followed your links as well.

    Odd, isn’t it? How the Magnus Hirschfelds of the world, who, with respect to the normalization of homosexuality, revile Christianity for having supposedly bound its followers in a moral straightjacket; who, in contrast to the narrow provincialism of America’s values, describe themselves as broadminded “citizens of the world”; who, put forth the theory that the solution to this unhealthy constriction of Libido is rampant sexual congress; I say it’s striking how they are always physically-repulsive men.

    “Hey everybody! The solution to all your mental health problems—and you have a lot of them—is to have sex with me!”

  94. @TKK

    “Do you have one REAL WORLD incident where a Jewish person actively stopped you from pursuing your dreams?”

    Good argument, but it’s misleading because cause and effect are often diffuse and cannot be isolated.

    Just yesterday someone brought up the disappearance of the American Ash tree due to an infestation of insects brought to this continent on products imported from abroad. We could also look at the infestation of the Wabash river by Asian Carp, the Zebra mussel and alewives in the Great Lakes and so on.

    Now, these infestations are the product of unlimited global trade and global trade, as we all know, is a pet project of Jewish economists such as Krugman. Now, Krugman is a typical alienated, myopic, ghetto-dwelling Jew who has learned to apply a mathematic formula to a set of data and then make (usually incorrect) predictions. The problem is that his theories are not comprehensive enough. They doesn’t take into consideration all the variables. Things like the devastation of the Ash or the ruination of the Wabash River or the loss to commercial and recreational fishing on the Great Lakes are not part of his calculations even though all these had a significant impact on a local ecosystem as well as a deleterious ripple effect on local economies. E.g. family resorts in upper Michigan were bankrupted because there were no fish for fisherman to bother to come up from Chicago to catch.

    But Paul is a city dweller. These are beyond his ken. I’m sure that, if confronted with these he would respond, “Well, Ash bats are a throwback. The global economy will respond. We can make them out of aluminum or plastic.” or words to that effect. And as for the people who loved walking in forests graced by stately Ash trees or who loved working with its creamy, white wood, well, that’s just tough luck for them. They are displaceable and replaceable. If local economies are hurt, too bad. Get used to it. Besides, those variables are not easliy assigned a mathematic value, so we just omit them.

    You see how it works? Anything that runs counter to his agenda, to the paycheck he gets for formulating bogus theories that prop up globalism, he simply dismisses with a backwards wave of his effeminate hand. As a Jew he could care less what happens to the people of the rural Midwest because in the eyes of a globalist, labor is fungible.

    What a coincidence, huh? That his intellectual views on labor and trade just happen to disadvantage the very people whom big-city, east-coast Jewish intellectuals revile.

  95. @Zumbuddi

    My question also addressed the issue of the prominence of Chinese and Indian names at the highest reaches of American high tech. My guess is that high IQ has a great deal to do with it.

    The CEO of Google is Sundar Pichai; the CEO of Microsoft is Satya Nadella — both with Indian backgrounds.

    The new tribalism is based on the formation of transnational technocratic elites with a variety of ethnic backgrounds. Jews are only one group among several who are dominating the “New World Order.”

    Any persuasive analysis of group competition (in Kevin MacDonald’s sense) needs to take these facts into account.

    • Replies: @Sam J.
  96. @utu

    I, for one, am not “attacking” Christianity. (I am Roman Catholic by religious background, by the way, and feel strongly grounded in Christian culture — architecture, art, literature, music, etc.)

    I would observe, however, that the vitality of Christianity in Western culture seems to be rapidly declining, especially in European nations. Christian symbols and assumptions about the world no longer seem to resonate strongly with upcoming generations.

    And one should also note that most leading Christian denominations in the United States are strongly pro-Jewish, pro-Judaism, pro-Zionist and pro-Israel. One reason for this state of affairs is shared ideological “software” and “code” (to use your metaphor) — they are both Abrahamic belief systems which derive their core memes from the Old Testament.

  97. @Sam J.

    No, no, no we don’t need any more “task”, we need to get rid of the Jews. We can do all this other stuff later.

    That’s the sober reality. No sense in intermediate steps, I guess.

  98. Dube says:
    @Crimean refugee

    And computation is not consciousness, as John Searle demonstrates.

  99. peterAUS says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Anyone intelligent and insightful enough to imagine what these ways of effecting change might be won’t need any help to understand what to do. All it would take is one Kaczynski-like genius with the requisite ruthlessness. It’s obvious though that the system is very worried about such individuals arising, probably part of the reason for the current crackdown.

    My bold and my sentiment exactly.

    Which does bring us back to the current problem: as the current trend continues we’ll see, I feel within next 3-7 years, such people. The thing is, TPTBs do know all that and putting a system in place to, if not prevent, at least MANAGE the fallout.
    Like this, for example:
    https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/mind-control-secret-british-government-blueprints-shaping-post-terror-planning

    It all boils down to: when such people take direct action would it be, effectively, too late for any meaningful change.

  100. @Johnny Rottenborough

    Christianity, by nature virulently anti-Semitic, had to be made safe for Jewry. Today’s Western Christianity—defanged, declawed and so hopelessly corrupted that it welcomes Islam—is a shining testament to Jewish perseverance and organizational ability.

    Truth, then sad truth.

    Roman Catholic Church militancy, directed both inward and outward, is the only hope and the only solution.

  101. Sam J. says:
    @Sean McBride

    “…The new tribalism is based on the formation of transnational technocratic elites with a variety of ethnic backgrounds. Jews are only one group among several who are dominating the “New World Order.”

    Any persuasive analysis of group competition (in Kevin MacDonald’s sense) needs to take these facts into account…”

    Maybe you are right but it’s also irrelevant because Jews seem to be the biggest problem. So let’s test your theory by getting rid of the Jews first. Then if the others are a problem we can get rid of them later but getting rid of the Jews doesn’t require studying the situation at all. It’s been studied to death.

    The single most important event needed for Whites to survive in some sort of relative freedom in the US, Europe and elsewhere is to get rid of the Jews. Peacefully if we can get it but they must go no matter what. All the rest of our problems, foibles, demerits we can work on at our leisure without the interference of the Jews which makes dealing with our problems insurmountable.

  102. Art says:

    The Jew commenters charge that we blame all the troubles of the world on them. How many times a day do we see that absurd charge being made? That is a gross exaggeration. No one in their right mind believes that. That unjust claim is just one more Jew wordsmith big lie.

    With that said – think about things without Israel – what would the world be like without Israel? How much more peaceful, would the world be if Israel did not exist?

    Think about it – think about all the wars – think about no ME nukes – think about no 9/11 – think about no pending Iran war.

    Think of the millions of displaced people, the millions maimed – the million dead!

    Think of all the trillions of dollars that could have been spent fixing real problems – and not spend on the demands of one very greedy mendacious dishonest tribe of malcontents and misanthropes.

    Hmm?

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Art

    • Replies: @Sam J.
  103. peterAUS says:

    The single most important event needed for Whites to survive in some sort of relative freedom in the US, Europe and elsewhere is to get rid of the Jews.

    For the sake of conversation, have you ever thought that Jews are simply the most obvious and the first line of “enemy’s” battle order?

    Like, they are….small patrols in no-man’s land, observation posts on hills, sniper teams etc.
    The second (main) echelon is somebody/something else, hidden behind those hills. Artillery, armor, air assets…..

    Or, you focus on getting rid of patrols, observation posts and snipers but not taking into account the rest could be….interesting exercise for your force.

    It’s tempting and natural to get at “them”. Chase down patrols and blast out the observation posts and snipers.
    And then get smashed by the main enemy force just waiting for you to show up.

    I just think that the PROBLEM is just a bit more complicated than what you suggest.
    Actually, much more complicated.

    Of course…hehe…trying to even start thinking about it is proving impossible.

    You can’t touch the first line (Jews) almost anywhere.
    And here, well……….just funny.

    Well, at least for now. There is always hope.

    • Replies: @Sam J.
  104. Titus says:
    @Cowboy

    Great comment.. Any idea where what you stated is elaborated upon in further detail?

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  105. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    An apt analogy for a layman, but not a helpful one. General AI is not an academic exercise in semantics but rather an existential question for whether humankind will survive the rise of artificial intelligence or not (as per AI alarmists)

  106. I have to give it to the Jews.

    They are the Ultimate Con-Artists and the Greatest Deceivers the world has ever known.

    Take MAGA and turn it into Hyper Open-Borders, Orwellian Shutdown, and War with Iran.

    All while we have a plethora of guns and they’re sitting ducks.

    GAME…….

    • Replies: @Sam J.
  107. Sam J. says:
    @Art

    “…The Jew commenters charge that we blame all the troubles of the world on them…”

    It’s often said that we blame the Jews for everything. That’s a damn lie we only blame them for getting us into WWI and WWII, the Federal Reserve, killing Presidents Lincoln and Kennedy. The destruction of Russia, Germany, Spain, England, US and all of Eastern Europe. The opium trade into China. Bringing slaves to America. Bringing in all the people after the 1965 change in immigration laws and all illegal immigration. Destruction of the studies of anthropology, psychiatry and social sciences. Destruction of the school system through uncivil rights for Blacks. Mass murder of Whites by Blacks due to uncivil rights laws. Destruction of all our major cities. Destruction of competence of government employees by uncivil rights laws banning effective testing. Destruction of the culture by mass media, just a few of which are radio, TV, movies and music. Widespread tensions between Men and Women due to their pushing of a Man hating version Feminism and attacking Women. Psychological warfare by portraying White Men as evil, corrupt, deranged and serial killers. Police committing widespread murder due to Jews training the police. Corruption of the government by bribery and when that doesn’t work blackmail. Murder of people to cover up corruption. Destruction of truth through distortion of the education system and mass media. The lowering of morals through pornography and evil behavior in film and TV. Sexual degeneracy and illegal forcing of Women and Men into trading sex for work. Pedophile attacks on girls and boys in Hollywood, and everywhere else they can. The pushing of communism and socialism. The movement of manufacturing to China. Widespread theft of military secrets and subsequent selling of those to the USSR , China and who knows who else. The banking collapse and subsequent bailout. Running a fraudulent FED currency scheme. Securities fraud in the bank bail outs and Mortgage backed Bond business. Blowing up our buildings and killing our people on 9-11 and the subsequent wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria. Multiple false flags where Americans have been murdered. The war in Ukraine. ISIS. The murder of Lebanese and Palestinians. Organ smuggling. Drug smuggling. Lots and lots of business and bank fraud. There’s more but that’s a few of the major ones.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @FoSquare
  108. Sam J. says:
    @peterAUS

    “…For the sake of conversation, have you ever thought that Jews are simply the most obvious and the first line of “enemy’s” battle order?…

    …I just think that the PROBLEM is just a bit more complicated than what you suggest.
    Actually, much more complicated…”

    OK maybe you are right. Prove this. Give us evidence of this. Show us where these forces are, where their power resides. Show us how they unify their efforts logically. I bet we, or a large amount of us who read these sorts of articles, know of a vast, massive amount of things the Jews have been in charge of or have funded that have caused a great deal of harm to Western society,(Whites). Now you say different, prove it. Let’s say it’s “The Cabal”, whatever that is. Where is the cabals TV stations feeding us lies. Where are it’s newspapers, where is it’s teachers poring abuse on White Males, I mean where is the evidence to blame everything on some…well we don’t even know what as you can’t even name it? And where is the evidence that the “whatever” has control over the Jews, of which we know are involved in a great deal of evil? Spell out this method of control. Spell out their motive.

    Well maybe you are right but let’s deal with what we do know is a major problem, the Jews, then we’ll deal with the “phantom” whatever you seem so concerned about.

    No matter how stupid we are or how many forces of evil are arrayed against us or whatever “task” we need to do to better ourselves it’s obvious that it will make things better and easier to work on the various defects we do have if we get rid of the Jews.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  109. The nose is our biggest problem, for sure.

    They are wrecking the west to prevent another “holocaust.”

    • Replies: @geokat62
  110. geokat62 says:
    @Robert Dolan

    They are wrecking the west to prevent another “holocaust.”

    Having been expelled 108 times before from various European nations, this kind of reminds me of the Looney Tunes cartoon, Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner.

    After every failed attempt at capturing the Road Runner, Wile E. Coyote would receive in the mail from Acme Inc. another contraption to help get his hands on his nemesis, the Road Runner.

    It appears we’re at the precipice of 109 and The Lobby is going for broke. This time, it has devised a diabolical plan to destroy Edom for good: mass immigration coupled with mass miscegenation. The clock is ticking, but if they don’t get it right this time around, given the severe damage they have inflicted on Western nations, the backlash, in my view, will be unprecedented.

    That’s why I keep urging them to SHUT IT DOWN before it’s too late.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  111. peterAUS says:
    @Sam J.

    OK maybe you are right.

    That’s the good start.

    Prove this. Give us evidence of this. Show us where these forces are, where their power resides. Show us how they unify their efforts logically.

    I can’t. Just have a hunch, if you will.
    I am, though, willing to work on that hunch. And, I do know HOW to properly work on that. Something so simple and….hehehe..haven’t see that anywhere on “alternative”.

    Let’s say it’s “The Cabal”, whatever that is. Where is the cabals TV stations feeding us lies. Where are it’s newspapers, where is it’s teachers poring abuse on White Males, I mean where is the evidence to blame everything on some…well we don’t even know what as you can’t even name it?

    Fair questions.
    I have some for you:
    Where is the state security apparatus, armed police and last, but definitely not least. armed forces?
    Because…..all what you say is, ultimately, backed up and enforced, by capability to deliver lethal force.
    Do you really think, should the enforcement mechanism disappear, TV, newspapers, teachers…whatever…..will mean anything?

    And where is the evidence that the “whatever” has control over the Jews, of which we know are involved in a great deal of evil?

    Not control, working together.
    Jews are soft arm of the Cabal. Somebody else is hard one.

    Spell out this method of control. Spell out their motive.

    Method? You serious?
    How about going to prison for being anti-Semitic? Or dead.
    Can you visualize the full chain of events from being accused of anti-Semtism? Full.
    If you can’t we are wasting time here.
    If you can, well, tell me when the “hard arm” gets onto the accused? And, who is in control of that arm? Who comprises that arm? The most important…what is the real purpose of that arm?

    Well maybe you are right but let’s deal with what we do know is a major problem, the Jews, then we’ll deal with the “phantom” whatever you seem so concerned about.

    Free will, brother.
    I just think the major problem is much closer to home.

    No matter how stupid we are or how many forces of evil are arrayed against us or whatever “task” we need to do to better ourselves it’s obvious that it will make things better and easier to work on the various defects we do have if we get rid of the Jews.

    Yeah.
    And after that some other group.
    And some other.
    Until there is only one man left standing on this planet.

    • Replies: @Sam J.
    , @Robert Dolan
  112. Sam J. says:
    @Dissident X

    “…I have to give it to the Jews.

    They are the Ultimate Con-Artists and the Greatest Deceivers the world has ever known…”

    I agree. Total persistence. Lying even when everyone KNOWS they are. I guess maybe they think 1 person out of thousand doesn’t know and they are going to get them to attack Iran for them.

    “…Take MAGA and turn it into Hyper Open-Borders, Orwellian Shutdown, and War with Iran…”

    I’m not so sure about this but I’ll grant you it’s very likely. We’ll have to wait and see (that’s the point…right, make us wait).

    “…All while we have a plethora of guns and they’re sitting ducks.

    GAME…….”

    I think it likely if Trump proves to be another false flag then…people will be really pissed. He’s done a lot of stuff that seems to be moving in the right direction but…there’s a massive shit load of things he could do to break everything open. 9-11 and building 7, (which is completely impossible for a building to fall the same speed as a rock dropped in air without ALL support being removed first), the next is Sandy Hook which looks (not 100% sure) like the whole thing was made up. This could be easily proven one way or another with Federal subpoena power over documents and witnesses. Why doesn’t he???? Another would be the Boston bombing. The guy who had his leg blown off, supposedly, looks like a big fake to me. It could be proven with a couple days investigation.

    Trump is going to have to bust something big like this or it’s probably 100% that he’s controlled opposition and Q is just an edgy FOX news.

    I do think things have changed. In the past they could use lack of communication between regions to pack up and move to another once they had over parasited one area. They are playing for all the marbles this time. The Chinese, Indians and all of Asian know they are playing the US and Europe. They will not let them pass and more and more people every day learn of their thousands of years of deceit and perfidy. If they lose this time it will set them back at least many hundreds of years and possibly forever.

  113. Sam J. says:
    @peterAUS

    “…And after that some other group.
    And some other.
    Until there is only one man left standing on this planet…”

    Uh…no. Just until we do away with all the psychopaths which we can tell by brain scans.

    As for all the rest you said.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  114. peterAUS says:
    @Sam J.

    Just until we do away with all the psychopaths which we can tell by brain scans.

    Hahaha……by brain scans, a?
    Neat, neat.

  115. FoSquare says:
    @Sam J.

    This list of charges you’ve enumerated could be the subject of an epochal lawsuit filed by the Peoples of the World against Global Mammonism:

    LAWSUIT CONCERNING
    THE WORLD —

    WE THE PEOPLE,
    THE DEBTORS OF USURY
    V.
    WE THE BANKERS,
    THE SERVANTS OF MAMMON,
    UNDER THE AEGIS OF
    MOSAIC LAW

  116. Cowboy [AKA "Hoot"] says:
    @Titus

    I have lived this for the last 30 years, most of what I wrote about is now history described by direct experience. Hodgen Law has a great series going on now:

    https://hodgen.com/blog/

    [MORE]

    June 7, 2019 – Debra Rudd
    Exit Tax Book Chapter 6: Mark-to-Market Taxation

    Last month, I explained how to determine if you are a covered or non-covered expatriate.

    The major difference between covered and non-covered expatriates is that covered expatriates must pay exit tax, and non-covered expatriates do not.

    The exit tax applies to everything a covered expatriate owns. The method of calculating tax, however, differs depending on the asset involved.

    For most types of assets, the mark-to-market tax applies. To calculate exit tax under the mark-to-market rules, pretend that you sold everything you own on the day before you expatriated. Apply an exclusion to prevent tax on the first $713,000 of gain (for expatriations that occurred in 2018); pay tax on the rest…. continue reading

    Here are some other places I visit:

  117. @peterAUS

    What kind of stupid shit is this?

    Is this a disinfo campaign at retard level?

    Some nefarious group is “behind the jews” forcing the jews to wreck
    all of western civilization?

    Okay…the jews run the entire media, movies, TV, news, magazines, newspapers…..they run academia for the most part…..they run the FED and Wall St.,……..nose money funds both political parties……..

    So……who is “behind the jews?”

    The Amish? The Filipinos? The negroes?

    Do you really think you can come on here and convince redpilled people that it’s
    NOT THE JEWS?

    Give it up, goofball.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  118. @mcohen

    Tiresome bullshattery by an author who self promotes with not one single original idea.

    Says the know-nothing cretin with nothing whatever of his own to distribute or promote, except intellectual jealousy, spite and adolescent-level hasbara abuse.

    Fuck off.

  119. peterAUS says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Do you really think you can come on here and convince redpilled people that it’s
    NOT THE JEWS?

    Hell no.

    I can come here and discuss a thing or two with a couple of guys. Say….up to 5 % tops, including anonymous.
    Not your types, definitely.

    Here is a deal:
    We put each other on ignore and move on.

  120. One Tribe says:

    Andrew, thank you.
    First of all, beautiful writing; it is a joy in itself to read beautiful writing.

    Topical:
    Extremely pertinent that respected authors of your pedigree present an honest (much more) objective summary of the sorry current shituation, i.e. the obsessive haters of humanity gaining control of humanity, or obsessed with destroying it all, and relating the motivation… I think of it often in terms of the enslavement of our future generations to this creed of hatred and deception.

    Comments and commenters:
    It doesn’t help to complain about it.
    It is, what it is; identification of the pertinent facts of the matter is useful.
    Solutions, that is what is needed; so put on your solutioning caps, and share methods and approaches to:
    a. liberating minds, both those of humanity, and those who self-identify with the collective,
    b. devising methods to expose their agencies and infrastructures, i.e. the pet, dedicated defamation agencies; which, follows a strong trend, of naming things with antonyms.

    It really is like an onion, crossed with the endless rabbit hole from Alice in Wonderland, one layer of deception after another, all the way back to the Aipuru-Haibrew, and what they actually were.

    For this article, the manufacturing of stars in their field, I have recently (past few years) been working on my own independent model of it, since 2014 when there was a spate of deaths in the entertainment and particularly the music industry, and the legacy media send offs that the MSM carpet-bombed down upon us.

    Was I the only one that noticed that they were all…..[redacted]?

    Of course, when once one’s mind is freed of the control of the parasite, looking back in history becomes a new frontiere; everything you thought you knew, you must re-evaluate.
    MArx, as it turned out, wasn’t that clever, but he was the promoted [redacted] candidate, (and available), thus the effectively, world worship of Marx!
    Manufactured.

    I’m greatly enlightened by Douglas Reed‘s seminal “Controversy of Z___“; he covers this, and many other occasions.

    This is a good starting point for people to understand a baseline of the history; I recommend.

  121. Old Jew says:

    …One thing “Andrew Joyce” did right: 4 white kids.

    The rest of his paean “Why I Write” …… take it with a grain of salt

  122. gregor says:

    Excellent article. Disappointing comments section.

    My reading list just got a lot longer. Many interesting articles mentioned.

    If insight isn’t shared and preserved, then each subsequent generation has discover the insight anew or do without. And in some matters we cannot afford to maintain ignorance.

    • Replies: @Calvin Simms
  123. @gregor

    Agreed. This comment section is Jewish apologia and misdirection personified. Thus proving Joyce correct.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Joyce Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?