The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Kevin MacDonald Archive
Why Do Jewish Organizations Want Anti-Israel Refugees?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
The 2014 WaPo caption: "People hold a banner"--they mean "Arab Immigrants hold a banner." Credit: VDare.com.
The 2014 WaPo caption: "People hold a banner"--they mean "Arab Immigrants hold a banner." Credit: VDare.com.

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The Main Stream Media predicts Donald J. Trump will appeal for “national unity” in his Inaugural Address this Friday, but they’ve been mistaken before. One way he could wrong-foot the Narrative: by announcing an immediate pause in “refugee” admissions, currently surging, to be followed by a zero quota for the next fiscal year—something that, by a legal quirk, he has absolute authority to do. There would be hysteria, in which the major Jewish organizations would, almost certainly, join. My question: why would they do that?

The major Jewish organizations have certainly been in the forefront welcoming Syrian refugees [For Jewish Groups, Syrian Refugees are a Reminder, Not a Threat By Ron Kampeas, JTA.org, November 24, 2015; As Anti-Refugee Sentiment Builds, Jewish Agencies Push for Settlement, Greg Salisbury, JewishExponent.com, November 25, 2015]. This seems bizarre, given the well-known anti-Jewish, anti-Israel sentiments common among Muslims.

The Jewish leaders’ own rationales—which we should take seriously—generally derive from how they view the past. And it’s the fact that Jews were sometimes denied the ability to flee Hitler’s Germany.

But in privileging their own perceived interests, the Jewish organizations obviously are not taking into account the legitimate concerns of Americans about refugee resettlement’s impact on terrorism, social cohesion, unemployment, crime, and welfare costs—not to mention the ethnic genetic interests of whites. The entire issue is seen through the lens of Jewish memories. There is no attempt to make a case that admitting “refugees” will actually benefit America— the vast majority are uneducated and cannot be expected to contribute to a First World economy. [An ill wind, The Economist, January 23, 2016,]

Moreover, even granting that denying refuge to Jews in the 1930s was indefensible (and I don’t agree) there are solutions to the refugee problem that would not mean more unassimilable, non-White immigrants. Thus Trump has already proposed providing a Mid-East safe zone.

But why are Jewish organizations so sanguine about immigrants who harbor anti-Jewish, anti-Israeli attitudes?

Given that Jewish organizations do not promote anti-Jewish immigration to Israel—or, indeed, any non-Jewish immigration to Israel—we can rule out high humanitarian principles.

Rather we must seek an answer in terms of Jewish perceptions of their self-interest.

But for an evolutionary psychologist, this immediately presents a problem. There are several mechanisms implicated in the evolved psychological basis of ethnic conflict, But the most relevant: people have negative stereotypes of outgroups, and to discriminate against them. So why would Jews promote admitting people into Western countries even though they (like everyone else) are inclined to see the migrants negatively?

Separation and Its DiscontentsFor Jews living in Western societies, however, the migrants aren’t the only outgroup. Western peoples and cultures themselves are an outgroup— see my book Separation and Its Discontents. Hence one would expect Jewish negative attitudes toward both immigrants and the host white culture.

So Jewish attitudes could be analyzed as simply whichever outgroup summons up the greater hostility. And Jewish attitudes are primarily determined by their hostility towards whites.

Still, humans have rational thought processes that process culturally-available information and can suppress negative attitudes toward outgroups, while inducing empathy and guilt. In my view, these processes are central to understanding why so many Europeans wholeheartedly welcome refugees—after reading empathy-inducing accounts of suffering women and children in the Main Stream Media, and after being exposed to guilt-inducing education.

(And, of course, the anti-White revolution is nothing if not massively incentivized.)

But what rational calculations might lead Jewish organizations to promote the refugee invasion of Europe?

As reflected in their statements, first and foremost is the perception that racially-conscious, racially-homogeneous Germany turned against Jews during the National Socialist period; and that other European and European-derived countries (such as the U.S.) failed eagerly to accept Jewish refugees.

Lack of racial/ethnic homogeneity in diaspora countries is therefore seen as making Jews safer (see, e.g., here, p. 246).

Moreover, Jewish intellectual movements—prototypically, the Frankfurt School—have successfully portrayed ethnocentrism among Europeans as pathological—hence talk about the “virus” of anti-Semitism. Fear and loathing of White, Christian America runs deep. It is seen as a far greater threat than importing a substantial but relatively small community of Muslims, even if they are prone to terrorism and anti-Jewish attitudes.

Terrorism, after all is a strategy pursued by non-elite groups. An elite group like American Jews pursue their interests in the MSM, the legislative process, and the judicial system—top-down influence that is far more compatible with oligarchy than democracy. (An oligarchic model fits U.S. politics much better than a democratic model—see Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page in Perspectives on Politics, September 2014, Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens).

Muslim immigrants, given their proneness to street crime and low academic achievement, are no threat to the elite status of Jews. Nor are they a threat to the current oligarchical power structure of Western societies, an unholy alliance between large donors, politicians, and MSM and academia elites.

Moreover, the idea of any limitation on immigration to the West by a particular racial/ethnic or religious group is completely at odds with the ideology of multiculturalism and diversity, the “we’re all the same” mantra, and the ideology that Western countries are “proposition nations” committed only to abstract ideas like “freedom” and “democracy,” with no ethnic or religious content. And this ideology has been promoted by Jewish intellectual movements at least since World War II—a theme of The Culture of Critique. It has been internalized across the elite spectrum—by Republicans and Democrats, Jews and non-Jews alike

Commitment to immigration and multiculturalism is thus a central aspect of Jewish self-identity. It would be something like getting the Jewish community to turn its back on Zionism if it became politically costly as a result of pro-Palestinian activism. Not going to happen.

The late Lawrence Auster, a Jewish convert to Christianity, framed Jewish attitudes in terms of a “slippery slope” argument:

Now when Jews put together the idea that “any social prejudice or exclusion directed against Jews leads potentially to Auschwitz” with the idea that “all bigotry is indivisible,” they must reach the conclusion that any exclusion of any group, no matter how alien it may be to the host society, is a potential Auschwitz.

So there it is. We have identified the core Jewish conviction that makes Jews keep pushing relentlessly for mass immigration, even the mass immigration of their deadliest enemies. In the thought-process of Jews, to keep Jew-hating Muslims out of America would feed exclusionary attitudes among America’s white Gentile majority that could result in another Jewish Holocaust . Why Jews welcome Muslims The View from the Right, December 9, 2002.

Moreover, Jewish organizations have combined advocating high levels of immigration with simultaneously advocating intensification of police-state-type controls to ensure Jewish security. For example, in Germany even before the refugee influx, synagogues, Jewish schools and other organizations have been under constant police protection. [Migrant Influx In Germany Raises Fears Of Anti-Semitism, By Alison Smale, NYT, January 26, 2016]

Thus, for Jewish organizations, an obvious upside of refugee crime is that it provide a rationale for policies that have long been advocated by many in the Jewish community—especially curbs on free speech, and in particular speech related to ethnicity and immigration. It is no accident that, for example, in Germany, the migrant crisis has led to a campaign to shut down Facebook criticism of the invasion—with the full cooperation of fanatical immigration enthusiast Mark Zuckerberg.

As a result, the consensus view among Jews seems to be that the transformation of the West is manageable. And if some non-elite Jews, like the upward of 9,000 who left France in 2015 [French immigration to Israel surges in summer of 2015, YNet News, June 17, 2015], emigrate to Israel because of Muslim street-level hostility, this will not impact the Jewish elites.

The only real cloud on the horizon: the possibility that Leftist political parties, powered by non-Whites and White Social Justice Warriors, will become hostile toward Israel. Thus Muslims in the UK typically end up making alliances with White Leftists critical of Israel. The Labour Party is now dependent on MSM power, Muslim votes and Jewish donors—but Jewish money has been deserting as Labour takes an ever more critical view of Israel.

The same process is brewing in the US but will take a while longer. An important harbinger: President Obama’s abstention for the UN Security Council resolution condemning the West Bank settlements. Another: the fact that Rep. Keith Ellison, who has called Israel an “apartheid state,” is a candidate for chair of the Democratic National Committee.

Anti-Israel attitudes are quite common in the Democratic Party— a recent Pew Poll of Democrats found a near-even split, 33% favoring Israel, 31% favoring the Palestinians. This has led to considerable angst among pro-Israel pundits like James Kirchick. [A Warning to Jewish Democrats: The Time to Fight for Your Party Is Now, by James Kirchick, The Tablet, January 9, 2017]

If the UK is any indication, the Jewish donor base that is so critical for the Democrats will bail if the Democrats adopt anti-Israel positions. One can even imagine that in the future Jews will be far more likely to vote Republican.

In fact, one might speculate that Trump’s strongly pro-Israel stance is an attempt recruit Jewish support for his other policies, such as a ban on immigration of Muslims—much like Geert Wilders, who, like Trump, has called for restrictions on Muslim immigration while also being very pro-Israel.

I doubt this will succeed, but the logic is certainly there.

Notice that such a shift in Jewish attitudes on immigration would not be the result of low-level street crime and occasional acts of terrorism, but because of a possible loss of political control—because Muslim votes are having an effect on nationwide policy that affects Jewish interests.

To the Jewish Establishment, that is indeed very worrying.

Kevin MacDonald [email him] is emeritus professor of psychology at California State University–Long Beach. His research has focused on developing evolutionary perspectives in developmental psychology, personality theory, Western culture, and ethnic relations (group evolutionary strategies). He edits and is a frequent contributor to The Occidental Observer and The Occidental Quarterly. For his website, click here .

(Republished from VDare.com by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 159 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Mark Green says: • Website

    This is a very insightful and penetrating analysis. When it comes to this thorny subject, MacDonald is in a class by himself. Bravo, Professor!

    Read More
    • Agree: Kyle McKenna
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    This is a very insightful and penetrating analysis.
     
    But what analysis? He poses a rhetorical question in the title, which has a fairly obvious answer, and then fails to provide the answer.

    The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad. Of course, there is hardly any real antisemitism in the West, at least in the sense of a hatred of Jews just for being Jews. The lack of antisemitism is a problem for them ideologically, not its presence.

    Generally speaking, the purpose of all the synthetic terrorist events in which Muslims are framed is a strategy of tension. The resulting tension is quite useful to the Zionist power structure. That it could lead to negative outcomes for the ordinary Jewish person in France is not really a consideration for them.

    MacDonald is in a class by himself.
     
    Actually, Professor MacDonald seems to be in a class by himself in terms of a bounded understanding of the world. There are things he understands extremely well and I have learned from his writing. However, there are other things, like false flag terrorism, that he simply does not seem to understand at all -- unless he is being disingenuous, which is a possibility I have considered.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /article/why-do-jewish-organizations-want-anti-israel-refugees/#comment-1735996
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. joe webb says:

    I am unable to perceive a conclusion here. The jews need to be able leave any country. OK. Whites are a far greater danger to Jews than a few muslims.ok White guilt can be tapped and it is good to keep whites feeling guilty, especially about jews. OK. Lawrence Auster says that exclusion policies could be used against jews. OK. Curbs on free speech is a jewish goal and curbing anti muslim speech by whites is good for the Jews, since it can be used to keep hostile White sentiment toward jews under control as well. OK.

    1.”As a result, the consensus view among Jews seems to be that the transformation of the West is manageable.” 2. yet, that Muslim votes here in the US could become a dangerous factor. 3. that the Dem Party is about split now on Israel. 3. Jews are worried. OK.

    The fundamental question , per the title, is why jews support muslim immigration. I don’t think you have completely covered it.

    First, America, the most Protestant Nation of all Protestant Nations, and the only one that takes its religion seriously, in NEVER going to abandon the holy jews. That can be seen at every level of social and political and media reality, especially Fox News. Trump could be a joker, but I doubt it.

    Second, the chances of large muslim voting is nearly nil. When T. and the American populace, not the liberals, get done with it, the muzzies will be lucky if they can stay, let alone vote. However , again, Protestantism and even the Catholics now, luv the jews. It may be that only casual religious folks and the non-religious will really get straight with the jews. That does not mean that the Jewish Wars cannot be stopped. Trump has got himself in the hard place/rock place with his words so far re Israel and Isis, and so on.

    Third, like you said right off the bat, jews hate whites far far more than muzzies…in the US of course. The old Divide and Conquer strategy, taking up the Negroes as a holy Oppressed people and getting us Whites to fight over it, that is fundamental to jewish strategies here. Same thing can apply to muzzies, but will likely Not be at all successful, except for jewyorktimes and hollywood.

    Therefore, jews are stuck with their race equality song and dance, despite the obvious hypocrisy with regard to the Judenstaat. This is overlooked by Whites because of holocaust stories and religion. Jews get to be the great exception to consistency in the immigration wars. God wants them to be exempt from criticism of any type. but nothing lasts forever.

    So it remains Divide Whites and Conquer them. Nevertheless, anti-Jew feeling is mounting and all these jewish shenanigans are eroding their privileged place
    in the White psyche, especially among young folks and Dem Party anti-zionist folks.

    As Thomas Mann put it in Dr. Faustus (I think it was) “you jews are soon to be in real jewish
    trouble.’

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rabbitnexus
    What a racist, small minded and delusional rant.
    , @Wally
    The only reason the average American is more likely to agree with Israel is because they’ve had their head filled with various absurd fictions such as 'holocau$t' propaganda, “Judeo-Christian values”, and Jews being a uniquely righteous, exceptional, and persecuted people.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Jewish 'law' / Jewish supremacism / psychosis of Judaism / treatment of Christians

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIcHyDjZNYE

    Why have supremacist Jews have been marketing the '6,000,000' lie since at least 1869?

    http://i1117.photobucket.com/albums/k598/WhiteWolf722/TheSixMillionMyth.jpg

    , @Wizard of Oz
    America the most Protestant nation? Rubbish. The Scandinavian countries and Scotland, probably the whole UK, are more Protestant although they are indeed a lot less enthusiastic about religion than the US.
    , @shropster
    "anti-Jew feeling is mounting and all these jewish shenanigans are eroding their privileged place in the White psyche" - It's about time. Israel is not our ally and never has been.

    We need to get our troops out of the Middle East and let Rothschild, Inc. finace the entity that they have created and hire mercinaries to protect Israel from the Arabs.
    No more American blood should be lost to fight Israel's wars!!
    , @anarchyst
    There is much more to the story...when one understands the "roots" of Islam and comes to the realization that Islam is an Arabicized form of Judaism.
    The Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran have virtually identical passages that promote each "cult's" form of supremacy and hostility toward outsiders--those not of each respective "faith". The Talmud regards gentiles as livestock, to be used for the advantage of the Jew.
    One could safely argue that Judaism is practiced by Sephardic Jews and Islam is practiced by Arabic Moslems, hence the lack of real hostility between Jews and Moslems.
    When one understands this,the realization is that Judaism and Islam are closely related and each cult promotes its particular brand of "supremacism".
    The "snag" in the ointment is the Ashkenazic Jews, who hail from Eastern Europe, and have less "baggage", but more hostility when it comes to Judeo-Islamic affairs. Being the inventors and promoters of communism, the Ashkenazics are more atheistic and utilize Judaism more as a social organization than a religious or cultural belief system. Ashkenazic Jews show much more hostility to Arabs, Whites and other "outsiders" than Sephardic Jews...
    Both the Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran proscribe harsh punishments for transgressions against their respective believers and minimize the punishments for transgressions committed by believers against "outsiders"...
    One difference between Judaism and Islam is the treatment of Jesus Christ and his mother Mary.
    The Jewish Talmud states that Jesus Christ is boiling in hot excrement for eternity while his mother Mary is considered to be a harlot who consorted with a Roman soldier to birth Christ.
    The Islamic Koran regards Jesus Christ as a prophet--not the "Son of God", but a respected prophet, nevertheless. Mary is specifically mentioned in the Koran and is given a place of high honor.
    Now, which "faith" is more hostile to Christianity?
    , @gustafus
    As Thomas Mann put it in Dr. Faustus (I think it was) “you jews are soon to be in real jewish trouble.’

    Or as I've said to many an insufferable Jew..... NEXT TIME - REAL OVENS

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Why Do Jewish Organizations Want Anti-Israel Refugees?

    Because these refugees are diversity, a organized victim cult embraced by all Jews and Israel, and are intrinsically hostile to the Jewish people’s ultimate enemy, the white-straight-independent-nonhispanic-Christian-male.

    Jews and their unctuous diversity disciples frequently refer to their ultimate enemy as being a Nazi or white supremacist.

    The diversity credo:

    [MORE]

    Women are entitled because of Male oppression
    Jewish are entitled because of Gentile oppression
    Queers are entitled because of Straight oppression
    Muslims are entitled because of Christian oppression
    Disabled are entitled because of Healthy oppression
    Afro-blacks are entitled because of White oppression
    Latinos are entitled because of Gringo oppression
    Hispanics are entitled because of Gringo oppression
    Military Veteran are entitled because of Militia oppression
    2-party System Dependents are entitled because of Independent oppression
    Aboriginals are entitled because of Paleface oppression
    Asians are entitled because of Occidental oppression
    National Socialist are entitled because of local-state Government oppression
    Crony Capitalist are entitled because of honest Businessmen oppression
    Criminals are entitled because of Law-Abiding people oppression
    Zionist are entitled because of anti-Fascist oppression

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. Karl says:

    > Given that Jewish organizations do not promote anti-Jewish immigration to Israel—or, indeed, any non-Jewish immigration to Israel

    sad to say, that is not correct.

    Affluent north Tel Aviv is full of leftists who think its fabulous to retain thousands of wetback muslim africans…. in the poor neighborhoods of south Tel Aviv, of course.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. @Mark Green
    This is a very insightful and penetrating analysis. When it comes to this thorny subject, MacDonald is in a class by himself. Bravo, Professor!

    This is a very insightful and penetrating analysis.

    But what analysis? He poses a rhetorical question in the title, which has a fairly obvious answer, and then fails to provide the answer.

    The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad. Of course, there is hardly any real antisemitism in the West, at least in the sense of a hatred of Jews just for being Jews. The lack of antisemitism is a problem for them ideologically, not its presence.

    Generally speaking, the purpose of all the synthetic terrorist events in which Muslims are framed is a strategy of tension. The resulting tension is quite useful to the Zionist power structure. That it could lead to negative outcomes for the ordinary Jewish person in France is not really a consideration for them.

    MacDonald is in a class by himself.

    Actually, Professor MacDonald seems to be in a class by himself in terms of a bounded understanding of the world. There are things he understands extremely well and I have learned from his writing. However, there are other things, like false flag terrorism, that he simply does not seem to understand at all — unless he is being disingenuous, which is a possibility I have considered.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad.
     
    If this were true there would be no Chosenites in lands which are hostile to or uninterested in Jewish Supremaicism, like Iran and eastern Europe. Israel is really more like a staging ground for their bad behavior, a sort of bunker where ideas and resources stolen from the enemy can be held.
    , @Karl
    5 Jonathon Revusky> The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad.

    sorry, you don't get to define Zionism. Zionists do.

    Zion must exist because we were commanded to live there. It is against OUR OWN rules to (permanently) live anyplace else.

    Very few people are more comfortably situated than American Jews, yet we throw money at the problem of trying to talk them into leaving America and moving here. I'm not even sure that having them here would really help, but if are going to bring in the Ethiopians (I had mixed feelings about that, but that's a done deal), we should bring in the American Jews.

    I might have a secret plan to move the best of the GoodWhites to Freeholds in Samaria, in which case, I get define who a White person is. But anyplace else in the world, white people deine who they are. If they want to exclude some rather Aryan-looking Jews (there are plenty) - so be it. Self-determination is a thing.

    What's going here under the surface is that whites can't pull off a nationalist movement. They're GREAT at talking about it..... but let there be a REAL white-ethnic country (eg, Sweden, Germany, Netherlands).... and they will Somali-ize it all by themselves.

    When the wife of a beta fat slob fucks the pool boy, there's two people at fault, and none of them are the pool boy.


    I don't know if Rakhine people are good or bad, but I know that they do more than talk about building an ethno-state. Rakhines aren't white, maybe that's why they can spit in the face of the entire worldwide Muslim Ummah and not feel guilty about it.

    If we dispassionately look at it - the way an actuary or a commodities-speculator would look at it - guys like Jonathan Revusky cannot build nations that last.

    Fix THAT problem, John.

    , @L.K

    Actually, Professor MacDonald seems to be in a class by himself in terms of a bounded understanding of the world. There are things he understands extremely well and I have learned from his writing. However, there are other things, like false flag terrorism, that he simply does not seem to understand at all — unless he is being disingenuous, which is a possibility I have considered.
     
    That is my feeling as well, very good point.
    On Jewish power, strategies and influence though, he really is unmatched.
    , @OilcanFloyd
    Actually, Professor MacDonald seems to be in a class by himself in terms of a bounded understanding of the world. There are things he understands extremely well and I have learned from his writing. However, there are other things, like false flag terrorism, that he simply does not seem to understand at all — unless he is being disingenuous, which is a possibility I have considered.

    Do you think there is any real terrorism? I'm not that familiar with your views, so I'm asking. I don't buy the official 9-11 story, but I do believe that some terrorism is due to blowback or actual anti-western views.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Why Do Jewish Organizations Want Anti-Israel Refugees?

    Because Israel itself is, in many ways, anti-Jewish as well as anti-Semitic, and despite the hype, it’s a Zionist state; not a Jewish one.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. And it’s the fact that Jews were sometimes denied the ability to flee Hitler’s Germany.

    Glad you said, “sometimes.”

    They were, in fact, encouraged to leave Germany and it wasn’t easy to find a place to go. In fact, those who went to England could expect to wind up in concentration camps within the Brit empire (e.g., at York and the Isle of Man), and to be shipped to Canada and Australia.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dearieme
    The entry visas for Jews to enter Palestine were never fully taken up during the Hitler years. So there always was somewhere to flee to, but it would have meant living a poor agricultural life on the desert's edge, surrounded by people who hated you.

    For cultured, educated, urban Germans that would have been pretty unappealing.

    And of course "those who went to England could expect to wind up in concentration camps" is balls, plain and simple.
    , @Expletive Deleted
    Churchill's "collar the lot" order was understood to refer to all German/Axis refugees (and potential fifth-columnists) in the Isles. Obviously, given the circumstances, lots of them were Jews. The key criterion was being a recent arrival from Germany and the like.
    The wife's great-uncle, for ex., just carried on working on top-secret radio stuff as per. In naval uniform. Seeing as his 'educated Brummie' accent (like Enoch Powell) lent him an air of plausibility on the "one of us" front. Sound fellow; I had the great good fortune to inspect his attic and shed full of the most fantastic contraptions and souvenirs shortly before he died, including a very rare giant glass thermionic valve thingie that was something to do with the first attempts at radar. Maybe?. All went in the skip/dumpster after the funeral, I think.
    The IoM wasn't horrific (well apart from actually being the Isle of Man, fair enough), or all that long. One notable torture was to let a prominent German (?-Jewish?) archaeology professor teach the Brits how to excavate properly, using local Iron Age and other sites to demonstrate. With picnics. The utter beasts!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Gabriel M says:

    As a result, the consensus view among Jews seems to be that the transformation of the West is manageable. And if some non-elite Jews, like the upward of 9,000 who left France in 2015 [French immigration to Israel surges in summer of 2015, YNet News, June 17, 2015], emigrate to Israel because of Muslim street-level hostility, this will not impact the Jewish elites.

    LOL.

    Turns out it’s not a group evolutionary strategy after all. It’s a bit like Marx writing an article in which he casually mentioned that labour doesn’t actually determine after all.

    Pretty sad that the election of Trump has sent the great minds of the Jew-Theory-of-Everything into such contortions. Anything rather than downgrade their observations into a Jew-Theory-of-Some-Things I guess.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    .
    Turns out it’s not a group evolutionary strategy after all.

    It's called quantum social theory. Up, down, here, not here, there, good, evil, light, dark, positive, negative, ether, solid, meta-physical, materialist, God, and devil all in one discrete entity, yet universal and all encompassing; not what it is, but always what you want it to be.

    , @reiner Tor
    So aren't Jews voting overwhelmingly against Republicans and even more overwhelmingly against Trump (i.e. the first nationalistic Republican for a very long time)? That needs some explanation in a world where whites (this includes Jews already) have overwhelmingly voted Republican. Especially since Jews are higher income, and until this very election higher income people tended to vote more Republican.

    So what is your explanation for this overwhelming support for multiculturalism even seemingly against their self-interest?

    Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. I’ll answer first and then read the article and comments.

    1. They would rather see America/the West watered down and destroyed by immigration, than to see Israel swamped by Muslims or any immigrants.
    2. They hate white Americans and Europeans, and are happy to destroy what white Americans and Europeans have created in their homelands.
    3. They believe that they can keep Israel Jewish and inherit the West if they destroy the West and position themselves as the kings of the non-whites.

    Those seem to be the main reasons. It’s interesting that the JQ is allowed to be debated so freely at Unz. I wonder how this will end?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. Divide and conquer, and enemy of my enemy thinking. Couldn’t agree more with those who have reached this conclusion regarding their overlying strategy.

    Culture is key. Multiculturalism is their strategy to pit different cultures against each other. Immigration, white guilt, hate crimes, and the emphasis on and elevation of minority cultures along racial, sexual and religious lines is designed to both boost the ability of minority cultures to weaken the majority culture, and to hide and obscure where the real culture war is being fought. The real cultural war is being fought on economic grounds. It’s a very small group of economic elites waging war on everyone else.

    Once you redefine your assumptions of the cultural war along economic lines and away from the heavily propagandized racial, sexual, religious lines, apparent contradictions disappear, and many seemingly complex answers begin to easily fall into place.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  11. macilrae says:

    Lack of racial/ethnic homogeneity in diaspora countries is therefore seen as making Jews safer

    Exactly so, and ..

    Since the Hollywood films of the 194os the media have portrayed Arabs as bungling idiots and bloodthirsty assassins – although this has moderated in recent years, anti Arab (and of course anti Persian) propaganda is to be seen throughout the western corporate media. Sometimes blatant and crude, sometimes subtle. The goal of all this is to fix in the minds of the majority a strong distaste for these people, thereby serving Israel’s interests first and foremost. This has been extremely successful and the people themselves have definitely not helped their own cause – tending to have some rather unpleasing idiosyncrasies which are seized upon by the press at every opportunity.

    “Support” for Syrian immigration serves two purposes – it displays the racial tolerance for which the Jewish community is said to be famous (by whom?) and it brings Americans face to face with the new arrivals who, it has to be said, do not generally assimilate well. Thereby general dislike is enhanced; serving the main agenda admirably and inconveniencing the Jewish community hardly at all.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. iffen says:
    @Gabriel M

    As a result, the consensus view among Jews seems to be that the transformation of the West is manageable. And if some non-elite Jews, like the upward of 9,000 who left France in 2015 [French immigration to Israel surges in summer of 2015, YNet News, June 17, 2015], emigrate to Israel because of Muslim street-level hostility, this will not impact the Jewish elites.
     
    LOL.

    Turns out it's not a group evolutionary strategy after all. It's a bit like Marx writing an article in which he casually mentioned that labour doesn't actually determine after all.

    Pretty sad that the election of Trump has sent the great minds of the Jew-Theory-of-Everything into such contortions. Anything rather than downgrade their observations into a Jew-Theory-of-Some-Things I guess.

    .
    Turns out it’s not a group evolutionary strategy after all.

    It’s called quantum social theory. Up, down, here, not here, there, good, evil, light, dark, positive, negative, ether, solid, meta-physical, materialist, God, and devil all in one discrete entity, yet universal and all encompassing; not what it is, but always what you want it to be.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Muslim immigrants, given their proneness to street crime and low academic achievement, are no threat to the elite status of Jews.

    Well, I think Kevin MacDonald adequately answers his own question here.

    To put it crisply, Jews are going to prosper more – at least in relative terms – in an 85 IQ Lebanized society than in a 100 IQ homogenous society.

    Second, one could argue that a few minor assaults every year on the poorer Jewish schmucks by angry Muslims might be preferable to living in everyday safety and security but running the very low but constant risk of an ethnic “existential risk” such a second Holocaust.

    Read More
    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    The problem is that the ethnic strategy is not conscious. It's not like Jews discuss the possibilities and decide a rational policy to reduce the risks, instead it's just Jews share a certain attitude based on their shared ethnic history and consciousness as filtered down over the generations, which will lead to overwhelming support for certain policies among them. Since it's not rationally thought out, the policies they support might not actually be beneficial.

    the very low but constant risk of an ethnic “existential risk” such a second Holocaust.
     
    That was true until 1948. Perhaps until 1967. With a strong and nuclear armed Israel, such existential risks seem to be very low - certainly not higher than the remaining existential risk of multicultural people suddenly uniting against Jews, for example by converting the same religion. (Like at the end of the Roman Empire. I'd guess this religion will be Islam. Once Islam becomes a strong plurality, it could quickly become a dominant force through the intolerant minority rule, with which concept I'm sure you're familiar with. Then there will still be a lot of whites, but they will perhaps shred their previous identities and become fanatical Muslims.) I'd wager such an outcome is not any lower than the very low risk of another National Socialist government arising.

    The other possibility is the backlash by whites. I'd wager that if a white minority of 35-40% suddenly goes racially/ethnically conscious and espouses a National Socialist-like ideology, then they might actually regain control over their lands. I mean, 35% might be enough to win a however bloody civil war (especially since the 60-65% will still be divided into many small groups mutually hating each other), after which brutal ethnic cleansing will no longer be out of the question. If a National Socialist-like white leadership (with only 35% whites in the country) wins a Syria- or Lebanon-like (only much bloodier) civil war, it might easily become possible to commit mass murder on a previously unimaginable scale. Once you murder a quarter or more of your population, Jews will be a rounding error there. And given attitudes towards Jews among the racially conscious whites...

    Moreover, both scenarios will not only imply governments that are extremely dangerous to Jews, they will also imply fanatical governments obsessed with Jews and/or Israel. The Muslim takeover scenario will involve governments which might view Israel as a central problem (Muslims in Malaysia etc. are known to have espoused the Palestinian problem), while the Late National Socialist revival will mean bloody civil wars, after which going after Jews and Israel will seem like a minor thing to do. (That's very unlike how a NS government would behave if it just came to power in a still ethnically homogenous country. Such a government would have incentives not to risk the prosperity of its people by risking a conflict with a nuclear armed Israel. Besides, I think a NS government in the absence of mass immigration would be basically impossible.)

    Therefore, Jews currently are supporting a policy which might actually create the very dangers (either if whites submit and convert to Islam, or if they turn to the very hard right) that they are trying to escape.

    What is a third scenario for the endgame of multiculturalism? Is there one? I would like some civic nationalism, but it's basically impossible for civic nationalism to turn the tide of white dispossession, it can merely slow it down. So what next?
    , @Jonathan Revusky

    To put it crisply, Jews are going to prosper more – at least in relative terms – in an 85 IQ Lebanized society than in a 100 IQ homogenous society.
     
    Wow, a few million Arab refugees coming into Germany, with a population of 80 million, will lower the average IQ 15 points, from something like 100 down to 85. Gee, I wonder what the average IQ of the Arabs coming in must be. Wow, like a negative number, eh?


    Second, one could argue that a few minor assaults every year on the poorer Jewish schmucks by angry Muslims
     
    Something like that is a feature, not a bug. In fact, if none of these "minor assaults" organically happen, Mossad will stage some synthetic events.
    , @anon
    Dear Anatoly,
    You must think of yourself as a genius. Is it not said somewhere that such mentality is the surest sign of a moron?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Tulip says:

    I suspect in reality there are at least 3 tribes at play: i.) Orthodox (and Haredim), who are very ethnonationalist and don’t really care about transforming the Goyim, ii.) Liberal, pro-Israel folks who display the hypocrisy outlined above, iii.) Jews who actually believe in the multikult shite and are ambivalent to hostile to Jewish identity and Israel.

    The ranking i., ii., and iii. correlates with tfr, so you are looking at future, present and past to some extent. I think group i. can work with Euro nationalists if interests line up, I think group ii. will see the handwriting on the wall eventually and realize Muslim immigration at some point undermines Jewish interests (but probably too late). Group iii. will remain hostile until they stage their self-imposed demographic disappearance.

    One of the problems I have with MacDonald’s analysis is that the Jews that most exemplify “Jewishness” for MacDonald have the lowest tfr’s and highest intermarriage rates. This class of Jews will be extinct in one-two generations on their own accord.

    Read More
    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    No, for MacDonald it's group ii. which exemplifies "Jewishness" the most.

    But I agree that a finer resolution is possible, and that the Ultra-Orthodox might view things differently. To my knowledge they have voted overwhelmingly for Trump.

    I wouldn't trust them much, though. I know that for example in Hungary the Chabad-Lubavitch support Orbán, but are also supporting the suppression of free speech (especially promoting laws against Holocaust denial and "incitement of hatred"), were active in the doxing of a prominent (pseudonymous) holocaust denier, so to me they look like milder versions of the same SJW Jews. (At least they are against Muslim immigration.)
    , @biz
    Your comment is spot on* and contains more insight than the article and all of the other comments combined, but will be ignored because simple minded people love their simplistic categories such as 'Jews are like X.'

    * the one thing I would amend is that your group i) is actually divided pretty sharply into two very different ones: ia) Orthodox and some Haredi Jews who are ethnonationalist and pro-Israel, and ib) the other Haredi Jews who are anti-Israel and separatist, wanting no engagement or accommodation with either Zionism or modern Western civilization. In terms of TFR group ib is actually currently higher than ia, however there is much more drift from ib into ia than vice-versa so it is likely that 1a eventually dominate in Israel and elsewhere.

    Going forward, group ii will be diminished in percent but still dominate culturally and economically in Israel for the forseeable future, and will still be a major part of Jewish life in the West for a generation, while group iii is headed to demographic oblivion in Israel and the West at a rapid rate.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. dearieme says:
    @jacques sheete

    And it’s the fact that Jews were sometimes denied the ability to flee Hitler’s Germany.
     
    Glad you said, "sometimes."

    They were, in fact, encouraged to leave Germany and it wasn't easy to find a place to go. In fact, those who went to England could expect to wind up in concentration camps within the Brit empire (e.g., at York and the Isle of Man), and to be shipped to Canada and Australia.

    The entry visas for Jews to enter Palestine were never fully taken up during the Hitler years. So there always was somewhere to flee to, but it would have meant living a poor agricultural life on the desert’s edge, surrounded by people who hated you.

    For cultured, educated, urban Germans that would have been pretty unappealing.

    And of course “those who went to England could expect to wind up in concentration camps” is balls, plain and simple.

    Read More
    • Agree: reiner Tor
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. @Gabriel M

    As a result, the consensus view among Jews seems to be that the transformation of the West is manageable. And if some non-elite Jews, like the upward of 9,000 who left France in 2015 [French immigration to Israel surges in summer of 2015, YNet News, June 17, 2015], emigrate to Israel because of Muslim street-level hostility, this will not impact the Jewish elites.
     
    LOL.

    Turns out it's not a group evolutionary strategy after all. It's a bit like Marx writing an article in which he casually mentioned that labour doesn't actually determine after all.

    Pretty sad that the election of Trump has sent the great minds of the Jew-Theory-of-Everything into such contortions. Anything rather than downgrade their observations into a Jew-Theory-of-Some-Things I guess.

    So aren’t Jews voting overwhelmingly against Republicans and even more overwhelmingly against Trump (i.e. the first nationalistic Republican for a very long time)? That needs some explanation in a world where whites (this includes Jews already) have overwhelmingly voted Republican. Especially since Jews are higher income, and until this very election higher income people tended to vote more Republican.

    So what is your explanation for this overwhelming support for multiculturalism even seemingly against their self-interest?

    Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gabriel M

    So what is your explanation for this overwhelming support for multiculturalism even seemingly against their self-interest?

    Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.
     
    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.

    So, according to you, white people have an ethnic hatred of white people.
    , @OilcanFloyd
    "Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me."

    That sure seems likely to me. The message coming for Jews in the MSM is overwhelmingly one of anti-white hatred. Is that even worth debating?

    If Americans should defend themselves against Muslims, rampaging minorities and hordes of immigrants, how long until they decide that they should also protect themselves against Jews? Don't we all have a right to defend ourselves?
    , @Karl
    16 reiner Tor > Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.

    do ==you== intermarry with people you hate?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. geokat62 says:

    How about some Joe Biden mixed in with a little Abe Foxman?

    [MORE]

    In a remarkable but under-reported address, Vice President Joe Biden recently acknowledged that the “immense” and “outsized” Jewish role in the US mass media and cultural life has been the single most important factor in shaping American attitudes over the past century, and in driving major cultural- political changes.

    “Jewish heritage has shaped who we are – all of us – as much or more than any other factor in the last 223 years. And that’s a fact,” Biden told a gathering of Jewish leaders on May 21, 2013, in Washington, DC. “The truth is that Jewish heritage, Jewish culture, Jewish values are such an essential part of who we are that it’s fair to say that Jewish heritage is American heritage,” he added.

    “Think – behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those [social-political] changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good,” he said. “We talk about it in terms of the incredible accomplishments and contributions” of individual Jews, Biden went on, but it’s more profound than that “because the values, the values are so deep and so engrained in American culture, in our Constitution.”

    …….

    “The Jewish people have contributed greatly to America. No group has had such an outsized influence per capita,” Biden also said. More specifically, he cited the Jewish role in shaping popular attitudes and in setting policies on race relations, the role of women in society, and “gay rights.” He went on: “You can’t talk about the civil rights movement in this country without talking about Jewish freedom riders and Jack Greenberg … You can’t talk about the women’s movement without talking about Betty Friedan.” Biden also praised the Jewish community’s “embrace of immigration.”

    “I believe what affects the [social-political] movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else,” said Biden. “It wasn’t anything we [politicians] legislatively did,” he went on. “It was [such television shows as] ‘Will and Grace,’ it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace, and rapidly embrace same-sex marriage.”

    …..

    Another important consequence of the Jewish hold on the mass media and cultural life has been – as Vice President Biden suggested – a broad decades-long promotion of cultural-racial “diversity” and “pluralism.” Jewish-Zionist leaders regard maximum “tolerance” and “diversity” in the US and other non-Jewish societies as beneficial to Jewish community interests. “America’s pluralistic society is at the heart of Jewish security,” says Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League – a leading Jewish-Zionist organization. “In the long run,” he continues, “what has made American Jewish life a uniquely positive experience in Diaspora history and which has enabled us to be such important allies for the State of Israel, is the health of a pluralistic, tolerant and inclusive American society.”

    http://ihr.org/other/biden_jewish_role

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62
    Addendum:

    Consistent with this outlook, the ADL has for years promoted the slogan “Diversity is Our Strength.” In keeping with this motto, which it claims to have invented, the ADL has devoted great effort and resources to persuading Americans -- especially younger Americans -- to welcome and embrace ever more social, cultural and racial “diversity.”

    This campaign has been very successful. American politicians and educators, and virtually the entire US mass media, promote “diversity,” “multiculturalism” and “pluralism,” and portray those who do not embrace these objectives as hateful and ignorant. At the same time, influential Jewish-Zionist organizations such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, insist that the US must recognize and defend Israel as a specifically Jewish ethnic-religious state. Pluralism and diversity, it seems, are only for non-Jews. What’s good for Jews in their own homeland, Jewish-Zionist leaders seem to say, is not diversity and multiculturalism, but a tribalistic nationalism.

    http://ihr.org/other/jewishzionistpower2015
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Gabriel M says:

    To put it crisply, Jews are going to prosper more – at least in relative terms – in an 85 IQ Lebanized society than in a 100 IQ homogenous society.

    Name one.

    I have a theory for the behaviour of Jewish Liberal elites: they believe in liberalism.

    I also have a theory for the behaviour of non-Jewish Liberal elites: they believe in liberalism.

    But where’s the fun in that?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. @Anatoly Karlin

    Muslim immigrants, given their proneness to street crime and low academic achievement, are no threat to the elite status of Jews.
     
    Well, I think Kevin MacDonald adequately answers his own question here.

    To put it crisply, Jews are going to prosper more - at least in relative terms - in an 85 IQ Lebanized society than in a 100 IQ homogenous society.

    Second, one could argue that a few minor assaults every year on the poorer Jewish schmucks by angry Muslims might be preferable to living in everyday safety and security but running the very low but constant risk of an ethnic "existential risk" such a second Holocaust.

    The problem is that the ethnic strategy is not conscious. It’s not like Jews discuss the possibilities and decide a rational policy to reduce the risks, instead it’s just Jews share a certain attitude based on their shared ethnic history and consciousness as filtered down over the generations, which will lead to overwhelming support for certain policies among them. Since it’s not rationally thought out, the policies they support might not actually be beneficial.

    the very low but constant risk of an ethnic “existential risk” such a second Holocaust.

    That was true until 1948. Perhaps until 1967. With a strong and nuclear armed Israel, such existential risks seem to be very low – certainly not higher than the remaining existential risk of multicultural people suddenly uniting against Jews, for example by converting the same religion. (Like at the end of the Roman Empire. I’d guess this religion will be Islam. Once Islam becomes a strong plurality, it could quickly become a dominant force through the intolerant minority rule, with which concept I’m sure you’re familiar with. Then there will still be a lot of whites, but they will perhaps shred their previous identities and become fanatical Muslims.) I’d wager such an outcome is not any lower than the very low risk of another National Socialist government arising.

    The other possibility is the backlash by whites. I’d wager that if a white minority of 35-40% suddenly goes racially/ethnically conscious and espouses a National Socialist-like ideology, then they might actually regain control over their lands. I mean, 35% might be enough to win a however bloody civil war (especially since the 60-65% will still be divided into many small groups mutually hating each other), after which brutal ethnic cleansing will no longer be out of the question. If a National Socialist-like white leadership (with only 35% whites in the country) wins a Syria- or Lebanon-like (only much bloodier) civil war, it might easily become possible to commit mass murder on a previously unimaginable scale. Once you murder a quarter or more of your population, Jews will be a rounding error there. And given attitudes towards Jews among the racially conscious whites…

    Moreover, both scenarios will not only imply governments that are extremely dangerous to Jews, they will also imply fanatical governments obsessed with Jews and/or Israel. The Muslim takeover scenario will involve governments which might view Israel as a central problem (Muslims in Malaysia etc. are known to have espoused the Palestinian problem), while the Late National Socialist revival will mean bloody civil wars, after which going after Jews and Israel will seem like a minor thing to do. (That’s very unlike how a NS government would behave if it just came to power in a still ethnically homogenous country. Such a government would have incentives not to risk the prosperity of its people by risking a conflict with a nuclear armed Israel. Besides, I think a NS government in the absence of mass immigration would be basically impossible.)

    Therefore, Jews currently are supporting a policy which might actually create the very dangers (either if whites submit and convert to Islam, or if they turn to the very hard right) that they are trying to escape.

    What is a third scenario for the endgame of multiculturalism? Is there one? I would like some civic nationalism, but it’s basically impossible for civic nationalism to turn the tide of white dispossession, it can merely slow it down. So what next?

    Read More
    • Agree: Anatoly Karlin
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Gabriel M says:
    @reiner Tor
    So aren't Jews voting overwhelmingly against Republicans and even more overwhelmingly against Trump (i.e. the first nationalistic Republican for a very long time)? That needs some explanation in a world where whites (this includes Jews already) have overwhelmingly voted Republican. Especially since Jews are higher income, and until this very election higher income people tended to vote more Republican.

    So what is your explanation for this overwhelming support for multiculturalism even seemingly against their self-interest?

    Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.

    So what is your explanation for this overwhelming support for multiculturalism even seemingly against their self-interest?

    Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.

    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.

    So, according to you, white people have an ethnic hatred of white people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    The vast majority of whites worldwide are clueless about Trump and what actually goes on in America. They also don't support the destruction of their own nations, families and cultures. Multiculturalism and mass immigration are largely forced on whites.

    If only whites were allowed to vote, Trump would have won by a popular landslide, and there would be no demographic change.
    , @lavoisier
    Indeed they do.

    Because in today's world of endless hate filled lies and propaganda from our controlled media against whites, being anti-white is fashionable. Weak people are susceptible to the charms of fashion.

    But shame on them for buying into this masochistic narrative.
    , @iffen
    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.

    I guess the 63% of white men who voted and 53% of white women who voted didn't get your message.
    , @Jonathan Revusky

    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.
     
    Uhh, yeah, and they came about these views independently, eh? Like, no mention of who dominates the media, higher education, Hollywood, i.e. all the institutions that define "respectable" public opinion, that largely form the mental world that people live in.

    No, everybody just thought about it independently and came to these conclusions. Whatever...

    Oh, by the way, Gabe, how's that rebuttal of my latest article coming along? I suppose it will be really devastating, like the rebuttals you wrote of my previous articles, eh?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. @Tulip
    I suspect in reality there are at least 3 tribes at play: i.) Orthodox (and Haredim), who are very ethnonationalist and don't really care about transforming the Goyim, ii.) Liberal, pro-Israel folks who display the hypocrisy outlined above, iii.) Jews who actually believe in the multikult shite and are ambivalent to hostile to Jewish identity and Israel.

    The ranking i., ii., and iii. correlates with tfr, so you are looking at future, present and past to some extent. I think group i. can work with Euro nationalists if interests line up, I think group ii. will see the handwriting on the wall eventually and realize Muslim immigration at some point undermines Jewish interests (but probably too late). Group iii. will remain hostile until they stage their self-imposed demographic disappearance.

    One of the problems I have with MacDonald's analysis is that the Jews that most exemplify "Jewishness" for MacDonald have the lowest tfr's and highest intermarriage rates. This class of Jews will be extinct in one-two generations on their own accord.

    No, for MacDonald it’s group ii. which exemplifies “Jewishness” the most.

    But I agree that a finer resolution is possible, and that the Ultra-Orthodox might view things differently. To my knowledge they have voted overwhelmingly for Trump.

    I wouldn’t trust them much, though. I know that for example in Hungary the Chabad-Lubavitch support Orbán, but are also supporting the suppression of free speech (especially promoting laws against Holocaust denial and “incitement of hatred”), were active in the doxing of a prominent (pseudonymous) holocaust denier, so to me they look like milder versions of the same SJW Jews. (At least they are against Muslim immigration.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tulip
    I think MacDonald moves between ii.) and iii.) often without noticing.

    Certainly, support for feminism, LGBT rights, sympathy for Palestinian activists (can you say ADL), these are not positions one takes if you want to secure a future for ethnic Jews. Certainly, some Jews view these things (like mass immigration) as good for the goyim, but many Jews (in my experience) actually sincerely embrace this crap for Jews, which belies an unconscious death wish.

    I don't want to get into the good Jew/bad Jew stuff. I don't actually care beyond what the group can (or cannot) contribute to the movement. However, there is a certain diversity of frameworks and different possible combinations politically which should be recognized.

    Personally, I think the Jews are screwed, and will get screwed harder than the Anglo-Saxons. Once the West hits peak Muslim (and Europe is already there), Jews will be marginalized then purged from the Left. Once the Jews are purged, then the Left can unify Black, Brown and White in a "class-based" resistance to parasitic "financial capitalism" and "bankers" (e.g. Jews). The Right by that time will be obsessed primarily with the creeping horde of color (and concerned about leaking white working class support to the Socialists), and whatever "home" the Jews will find on the right will be of the strange bedfellow variety.

    However, I give the multikult about 20 years before the Great God of Diversity receives daily blood offerings.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. @reiner Tor
    So aren't Jews voting overwhelmingly against Republicans and even more overwhelmingly against Trump (i.e. the first nationalistic Republican for a very long time)? That needs some explanation in a world where whites (this includes Jews already) have overwhelmingly voted Republican. Especially since Jews are higher income, and until this very election higher income people tended to vote more Republican.

    So what is your explanation for this overwhelming support for multiculturalism even seemingly against their self-interest?

    Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.

    “Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.”

    That sure seems likely to me. The message coming for Jews in the MSM is overwhelmingly one of anti-white hatred. Is that even worth debating?

    If Americans should defend themselves against Muslims, rampaging minorities and hordes of immigrants, how long until they decide that they should also protect themselves against Jews? Don’t we all have a right to defend ourselves?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Karl
    22 Oilcan Floyd > Don’t we all have a right to defend ourselves?


    First you would need a set of balls that's larger than your keyboard, Floyd.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. biz says:
    @Tulip
    I suspect in reality there are at least 3 tribes at play: i.) Orthodox (and Haredim), who are very ethnonationalist and don't really care about transforming the Goyim, ii.) Liberal, pro-Israel folks who display the hypocrisy outlined above, iii.) Jews who actually believe in the multikult shite and are ambivalent to hostile to Jewish identity and Israel.

    The ranking i., ii., and iii. correlates with tfr, so you are looking at future, present and past to some extent. I think group i. can work with Euro nationalists if interests line up, I think group ii. will see the handwriting on the wall eventually and realize Muslim immigration at some point undermines Jewish interests (but probably too late). Group iii. will remain hostile until they stage their self-imposed demographic disappearance.

    One of the problems I have with MacDonald's analysis is that the Jews that most exemplify "Jewishness" for MacDonald have the lowest tfr's and highest intermarriage rates. This class of Jews will be extinct in one-two generations on their own accord.

    Your comment is spot on* and contains more insight than the article and all of the other comments combined, but will be ignored because simple minded people love their simplistic categories such as ‘Jews are like X.’

    * the one thing I would amend is that your group i) is actually divided pretty sharply into two very different ones: ia) Orthodox and some Haredi Jews who are ethnonationalist and pro-Israel, and ib) the other Haredi Jews who are anti-Israel and separatist, wanting no engagement or accommodation with either Zionism or modern Western civilization. In terms of TFR group ib is actually currently higher than ia, however there is much more drift from ib into ia than vice-versa so it is likely that 1a eventually dominate in Israel and elsewhere.

    Going forward, group ii will be diminished in percent but still dominate culturally and economically in Israel for the forseeable future, and will still be a major part of Jewish life in the West for a generation, while group iii is headed to demographic oblivion in Israel and the West at a rapid rate.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    The problem is that Jews tend to be enough like X to be an issue.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. nate says:
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  25. @Gabriel M

    So what is your explanation for this overwhelming support for multiculturalism even seemingly against their self-interest?

    Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.
     
    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.

    So, according to you, white people have an ethnic hatred of white people.

    The vast majority of whites worldwide are clueless about Trump and what actually goes on in America. They also don’t support the destruction of their own nations, families and cultures. Multiculturalism and mass immigration are largely forced on whites.

    If only whites were allowed to vote, Trump would have won by a popular landslide, and there would be no demographic change.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gabriel M

    The vast majority of whites worldwide are clueless about Trump and what actually goes on in America.
     
    The vast majority of Jews are clueless about Trump and what actually goes on in America.

    They also don’t support the destruction of their own nations, families and cultures
     
    Of course, they don't "want" it, but they have voted for it persistently. No-one wants the bad consequences of the ideology they believe in.

    Multiculturalism and mass immigration are largely forced on whites.
     
    By Whites, who other whites vote for.

    If only whites were allowed to vote, Trump would have won by a popular landslide, and there would be no demographic change.
     
    As American Whites come closer to being a minority, they start voting like a minority, that is to say in blocks. Europeans will catch up, but in the meantime they vote for liberalism. Overwhelmingly white America voted in LBJ in a real landslide far dwarfing what Trump would have achieved among contemporary Whites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. geokat62 says:
    @geokat62
    How about some Joe Biden mixed in with a little Abe Foxman?

    In a remarkable but under-reported address, Vice President Joe Biden recently acknowledged that the “immense” and “outsized” Jewish role in the US mass media and cultural life has been the single most important factor in shaping American attitudes over the past century, and in driving major cultural- political changes.

    “Jewish heritage has shaped who we are – all of us – as much or more than any other factor in the last 223 years. And that's a fact," Biden told a gathering of Jewish leaders on May 21, 2013, in Washington, DC. “The truth is that Jewish heritage, Jewish culture, Jewish values are such an essential part of who we are that it's fair to say that Jewish heritage is American heritage,” he added.

    “Think - behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those [social-political] changes, whether it's in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good,” he said. “We talk about it in terms of the incredible accomplishments and contributions” of individual Jews, Biden went on, but it's more profound than that “because the values, the values are so deep and so engrained in American culture, in our Constitution.”

    .......

    “The Jewish people have contributed greatly to America. No group has had such an outsized influence per capita,” Biden also said. More specifically, he cited the Jewish role in shaping popular attitudes and in setting policies on race relations, the role of women in society, and “gay rights.” He went on: “You can't talk about the civil rights movement in this country without talking about Jewish freedom riders and Jack Greenberg ... You can't talk about the women's movement without talking about Betty Friedan.” Biden also praised the Jewish community's “embrace of immigration.”

    “I believe what affects the [social-political] movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else,” said Biden. “It wasn't anything we [politicians] legislatively did,” he went on. “It was [such television shows as] ‘Will and Grace,' it was the social media. Literally. That's what changed peoples' attitudes. That's why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace, and rapidly embrace same-sex marriage."

    .....

    Another important consequence of the Jewish hold on the mass media and cultural life has been – as Vice President Biden suggested – a broad decades-long promotion of cultural-racial “diversity” and “pluralism.” Jewish-Zionist leaders regard maximum “tolerance” and “diversity” in the US and other non-Jewish societies as beneficial to Jewish community interests. “America's pluralistic society is at the heart of Jewish security,” says Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League – a leading Jewish-Zionist organization. “In the long run,” he continues, “what has made American Jewish life a uniquely positive experience in Diaspora history and which has enabled us to be such important allies for the State of Israel, is the health of a pluralistic, tolerant and inclusive American society.”

    http://ihr.org/other/biden_jewish_role

     

    Addendum:

    Consistent with this outlook, the ADL has for years promoted the slogan “Diversity is Our Strength.” In keeping with this motto, which it claims to have invented, the ADL has devoted great effort and resources to persuading Americans — especially younger Americans — to welcome and embrace ever more social, cultural and racial “diversity.”

    This campaign has been very successful. American politicians and educators, and virtually the entire US mass media, promote “diversity,” “multiculturalism” and “pluralism,” and portray those who do not embrace these objectives as hateful and ignorant. At the same time, influential Jewish-Zionist organizations such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, insist that the US must recognize and defend Israel as a specifically Jewish ethnic-religious state. Pluralism and diversity, it seems, are only for non-Jews. What’s good for Jews in their own homeland, Jewish-Zionist leaders seem to say, is not diversity and multiculturalism, but a tribalistic nationalism.

    http://ihr.org/other/jewishzionistpower2015

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clearpoint
    Jews can be segregated into two groups, and only two groups. Economic elites and the rabble. Granted the Jewish rabble are several steps up the socio-economic ladder than most rabble. All the rest is just noise.

    The Jewish economic elite use their rabble just like any other economic elite group uses their rabble. They are well paid rabble because much is demanded of them. This is a very expensive thing to do, but the Jewish-created economic system of financial capitalism insures that their high compensation is paid for from other people's money, and out of other people's hard work.

    Multiculturalism in Europe and the US? Of course, because the greater the diversity the greater the struggle between much larger enemy cultures against each other. And the Jews are marketed in the wealthy countries they depend on to finance and support their goals as a tolerant and peaceful people.

    Tribalistic nationalism in the promised land, a seemingly huge contradiction? Not at all, unless you insist in looking at these positions through an ideological prism based on off point classifications of the Jewish people. As opposed to Europe and the US, where diversity creates conflict, in Israel it is tribalistic nationalism which creates the conflict, which is needed to further the cultural mythology of the Jews as the persecuted chosen ones, and to gain the sympathy and support of enemy cultures in Europe and the US that they parasiticly feed off of.

    These economic elites are psychopaths, and they rule their culture with an iron fist. Their culture is closed and exclusive for to permit it to be open and inclusive would result in the destruction of their own power. Their rabble are highly educated, but also highly indoctrinated, constantly in pursuit of wealth and power through intellectually demanding and satisfying careers, and culturally and ideologically distinct from the rest of the world. The result is an environment in which their rabble are content to live their lives in blissful ignorance, turn a blind eye to the violence and cruelty of the policies of their leaders, and place their faith in the angry, vengeful God of the Old Testament who punishes all sinners who stand in the way. To question any of this is forbidden; in biblical terms it is to take a bite of the apple from the tree of knowledge, and thereby surrender your place in the Garden of Eden.

    Never underestimate man's willingness to escape the freedom of a hard reality for the safety and security of a compelling fantasy.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. @biz
    Your comment is spot on* and contains more insight than the article and all of the other comments combined, but will be ignored because simple minded people love their simplistic categories such as 'Jews are like X.'

    * the one thing I would amend is that your group i) is actually divided pretty sharply into two very different ones: ia) Orthodox and some Haredi Jews who are ethnonationalist and pro-Israel, and ib) the other Haredi Jews who are anti-Israel and separatist, wanting no engagement or accommodation with either Zionism or modern Western civilization. In terms of TFR group ib is actually currently higher than ia, however there is much more drift from ib into ia than vice-versa so it is likely that 1a eventually dominate in Israel and elsewhere.

    Going forward, group ii will be diminished in percent but still dominate culturally and economically in Israel for the forseeable future, and will still be a major part of Jewish life in the West for a generation, while group iii is headed to demographic oblivion in Israel and the West at a rapid rate.

    The problem is that Jews tend to be enough like X to be an issue.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. KA says:

    Why do the Jeiwsh organizations invite Jews hating Muslim in the west? The reason is same and no different from the reason the Neocons and the Evanlgoalcoholics offered before the invasion of Iraq . The said one thing ,planned for another thing and got ready for a completely different thing . Jewish know of the sickness that exists among the disadvantaged white American , Evangelicals rogues and the military Pentagon murderers : self promotion at the cost of Muslim lives under the respective covers of American Execptionalism, God given right to uproot and bomb people with no personal or social cost . The deal is sweetened by breaking of control of foreign resources ,getting large number of unemployable whites employed as adviser,contractors,security operatives and ,business analysts, NGO directors, housing of them in palatial complex .

    Israel benefits from continued friction between Arab and West between Muslim and Christian . It receives more military gadgets because of potential security thereat from the unglued dislocated masses .
    The right wings who used to be anti Jews 5 generations ago have become pro Israel because of money and space provided to them by Jewish controlled media like FOX WSJ and numerous other outlet But this benefit is exclusively restricted to issues of Muslim and Immigration of Muslim and to the Wetsern obligation to secure more lands and money for Jewish state . In that sense Right wing movement has been fully co-opted by the Neocons . Actually the right movement started germinating in Europe immediately after 911 -long before mass immigration – Fallacia of Italy was spewing her demented venom on Islam . Very soon the cartoon controversy was erupting Those controversies where planned and created by the right wingers in Holland and their financier and supporters in US . This created a climate of Islamophobia which later came to be criticized by the creators and the manipulators of the Islamophobia while same time allowing political parties and the candidates financed by them ( GOP Candidates in US elections) to ratchet up the canard and innuendo against Muslim and Islam .In other cases by supporting /financing Blairites in UK or Hollandite in France and Clinton in US made sure the war staging Muslim would roll on in Iran or Syria or some newly designated Muslim lands

    Here I see a shadow of painful pleading here by Mr McDonald to the Jewish- to be spared and saved . Not that long ago another columnist thought of the same – how about supporting Israel to the hilt and the Jews drop the demands for immigration It was followed by another article- —what about Israel accept Crimean annexation and America accept the annexation of Golan Height and thus getting Russia on the board for next phase of colonization-imperialism .

    Sounds like the deals that the nobles like Balfour Wilson LLoyd, Sykes Picot made among themselves with full blessings of Rudyrad Kipling are now reappearing .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Gabriel M

    So what is your explanation for this overwhelming support for multiculturalism even seemingly against their self-interest?

    Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.
     
    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.

    So, according to you, white people have an ethnic hatred of white people.

    Indeed they do.

    Because in today’s world of endless hate filled lies and propaganda from our controlled media against whites, being anti-white is fashionable. Weak people are susceptible to the charms of fashion.

    But shame on them for buying into this masochistic narrative.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. iffen says:
    @Gabriel M

    So what is your explanation for this overwhelming support for multiculturalism even seemingly against their self-interest?

    Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.
     
    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.

    So, according to you, white people have an ethnic hatred of white people.

    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.

    I guess the 63% of white men who voted and 53% of white women who voted didn’t get your message.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gabriel M
    I guess you don't know what "worldwide" means.
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-poll-international-countries-uk-hillary-clinton-rcp-us-presidential-live-election-a7367591.html

    Trump is simply stunningly unpopular with Whites around the globe. For example, even though Trump is explicitly pro-Britain and Obama was implicitly anti-Britain, Hillary beats Trump 64-15. White people just believe in liberalism, with due exception for Conquest's first law. America is a massive outlier.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. Gabriel M says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    The vast majority of whites worldwide are clueless about Trump and what actually goes on in America. They also don't support the destruction of their own nations, families and cultures. Multiculturalism and mass immigration are largely forced on whites.

    If only whites were allowed to vote, Trump would have won by a popular landslide, and there would be no demographic change.

    The vast majority of whites worldwide are clueless about Trump and what actually goes on in America.

    The vast majority of Jews are clueless about Trump and what actually goes on in America.

    They also don’t support the destruction of their own nations, families and cultures

    Of course, they don’t “want” it, but they have voted for it persistently. No-one wants the bad consequences of the ideology they believe in.

    Multiculturalism and mass immigration are largely forced on whites.

    By Whites, who other whites vote for.

    If only whites were allowed to vote, Trump would have won by a popular landslide, and there would be no demographic change.

    As American Whites come closer to being a minority, they start voting like a minority, that is to say in blocks. Europeans will catch up, but in the meantime they vote for liberalism. Overwhelmingly white America voted in LBJ in a real landslide far dwarfing what Trump would have achieved among contemporary Whites.

    Read More
    • Replies: @KA
    Human nature is obstinately unidirectional. It is guided be shorter and longer version of the self- preservation. America is getting hit at the longer version- dominance and control of other nation's resources and labors Europe like France is more at. the shorter version- issues closer to home . I have met French skeptics of sub Saharn North Africaner's integrative potential I also have heard not an alphabet let alone a word about the exploitative duplicitous violent French policies in Chad,Niger,CAR and in Libya . Neither I heard a word from Danish columnists and cartoonist on the daily relentless voluminous dumping of waste and radioactive materials on the coastal lines of Eriteria and Somalia .Longer version of self aggrandizement is undermining.the shorter version in Europe .
    , @OilcanFloyd
    "The vast majority of Jews are clueless about Trump and what actually goes on in America."

    Hence the shock by the MSM.

    "Of course, they don’t “want” it, but they have voted for it persistently. No-one wants the bad consequences of the ideology they believe in."

    Whites have repeatedly voted against the Republican establishment in congressional elections, but have repeatedly been given the bait and switch by their representatives. That's been going on for decades. The national party never offered up much of a candidate, which is why Obama won twice and Trump won this time. If the Republican presidents/majorities had done something for their constituents in the past 30+ years we'd have a far different country today.

    "Of course, they don’t “want” it, but they have voted for it persistently. No-one wants the bad consequences of the ideology they believe in."

    Few whites vote for the bait and switch offered by our elites. Their ideology is not ours, which is why they never say what they believe, or what they will eventually do when running for office. Why else have the major parties traded turns at being thrown out of power en masse over and over in the last 3 decades?

    "By Whites, who other whites vote for."

    Few whites would have ever voted for mass immigration, demographic change or multiculturalism if given the choice. We've just reached the point where the elites can't lie anymore.

    "As American Whites come closer to being a minority, they start voting like a minority, that is to say in blocks. Europeans will catch up, but in the meantime they vote for liberalism. Overwhelmingly white America voted in LBJ in a real landslide far dwarfing what Trump would have achieved among contemporary Whites."

    Whites have always voted their interests, just along regional lines. Nobody ever got to vote on immigration and multiculturalism. Those things were always pushed behind the scenes. LBJ was rejected to the point that he refused to run for a final term. And LBJ didn't exactly present himself as a war-monger and anti-white.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Gabriel M says:
    @iffen
    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.

    I guess the 63% of white men who voted and 53% of white women who voted didn't get your message.

    I guess you don’t know what “worldwide” means.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-poll-international-countries-uk-hillary-clinton-rcp-us-presidential-live-election-a7367591.html

    Trump is simply stunningly unpopular with Whites around the globe. For example, even though Trump is explicitly pro-Britain and Obama was implicitly anti-Britain, Hillary beats Trump 64-15. White people just believe in liberalism, with due exception for Conquest’s first law. America is a massive outlier.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Well, actually I do know what worldwide means. It's just that the 63% and 53% are what concern me. My connections to those worldwide "white people" are problematic. There are some elections ahead this year in other "white people" countries; we may see interesting results. Just because I'm not an anti-Semite doesn't mean that I'm not a patriot.
    , @BB753
    Never trust polls.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Jonathan Revusky

    This is a very insightful and penetrating analysis.
     
    But what analysis? He poses a rhetorical question in the title, which has a fairly obvious answer, and then fails to provide the answer.

    The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad. Of course, there is hardly any real antisemitism in the West, at least in the sense of a hatred of Jews just for being Jews. The lack of antisemitism is a problem for them ideologically, not its presence.

    Generally speaking, the purpose of all the synthetic terrorist events in which Muslims are framed is a strategy of tension. The resulting tension is quite useful to the Zionist power structure. That it could lead to negative outcomes for the ordinary Jewish person in France is not really a consideration for them.

    MacDonald is in a class by himself.
     
    Actually, Professor MacDonald seems to be in a class by himself in terms of a bounded understanding of the world. There are things he understands extremely well and I have learned from his writing. However, there are other things, like false flag terrorism, that he simply does not seem to understand at all -- unless he is being disingenuous, which is a possibility I have considered.

    The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad.

    If this were true there would be no Chosenites in lands which are hostile to or uninterested in Jewish Supremaicism, like Iran and eastern Europe. Israel is really more like a staging ground for their bad behavior, a sort of bunker where ideas and resources stolen from the enemy can be held.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    " Israel is really more like a staging ground for their bad behavior, a sort of bunker where ideas and resources stolen from the enemy can be held."

    You nailed it.

    Think Israeli / 'Russian' oligarchs, think Israeli military industries, think Israeli software companies, think Israeli anything.

    They are commonly described as parasites for good reason.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. iffen says:
    @Gabriel M
    I guess you don't know what "worldwide" means.
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-poll-international-countries-uk-hillary-clinton-rcp-us-presidential-live-election-a7367591.html

    Trump is simply stunningly unpopular with Whites around the globe. For example, even though Trump is explicitly pro-Britain and Obama was implicitly anti-Britain, Hillary beats Trump 64-15. White people just believe in liberalism, with due exception for Conquest's first law. America is a massive outlier.

    Well, actually I do know what worldwide means. It’s just that the 63% and 53% are what concern me. My connections to those worldwide “white people” are problematic. There are some elections ahead this year in other “white people” countries; we may see interesting results. Just because I’m not an anti-Semite doesn’t mean that I’m not a patriot.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    " Just because I'm not an antisemite, doesn't mean I'm not a patriot.

    Throughout your entire life, you and every American, have been brainwashed into believing the Jewish definition of what anti Semitism is.

    Truthful Definition: An Anti Semite is someone who is hated by Jews for exposing the negative impact they have had on the US economy (Goldman and Sachs, Berni Madoff, and the Federal Reserve), on politics (AIPAC's control of Congress and the Executive Branch) on Academia (Holohoax and Jewish Bolshevism) on Hollywood (decadence and warmongering) on Supreme Court (40% Jewish liberalism) on Foreign policy
    ( NeoCons and Iraq war and war on terrorism) Flase Flag attacks (King David Hotel, the USS Liberty.) on the treat to humanity (Sampson Option) on Freedom of Speech (anti BDS laws and criminalizing Holocaust Revision)

    Read Charles Lindbergh last speech and find out why he established the American First Party. This will help you with why there is so much antisemitism in the US. You will also learn what Patriotism is and what it means to be a Patriot of the US.

    What is the main objectives of the UNZ Review. Isn't to compile a list of all of the US anti Semite PATRIOTS for the ADL?

    Lastly, the Jewish religion and race has nothing to do with Antisemitism.
    Antisemitism and Patriotism is a natural response to US Jews and international Jewry 's behavior.


    Keith

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. KA says:
    @Gabriel M

    The vast majority of whites worldwide are clueless about Trump and what actually goes on in America.
     
    The vast majority of Jews are clueless about Trump and what actually goes on in America.

    They also don’t support the destruction of their own nations, families and cultures
     
    Of course, they don't "want" it, but they have voted for it persistently. No-one wants the bad consequences of the ideology they believe in.

    Multiculturalism and mass immigration are largely forced on whites.
     
    By Whites, who other whites vote for.

    If only whites were allowed to vote, Trump would have won by a popular landslide, and there would be no demographic change.
     
    As American Whites come closer to being a minority, they start voting like a minority, that is to say in blocks. Europeans will catch up, but in the meantime they vote for liberalism. Overwhelmingly white America voted in LBJ in a real landslide far dwarfing what Trump would have achieved among contemporary Whites.

    Human nature is obstinately unidirectional. It is guided be shorter and longer version of the self- preservation. America is getting hit at the longer version- dominance and control of other nation’s resources and labors Europe like France is more at. the shorter version- issues closer to home . I have met French skeptics of sub Saharn North Africaner’s integrative potential I also have heard not an alphabet let alone a word about the exploitative duplicitous violent French policies in Chad,Niger,CAR and in Libya . Neither I heard a word from Danish columnists and cartoonist on the daily relentless voluminous dumping of waste and radioactive materials on the coastal lines of Eriteria and Somalia .Longer version of self aggrandizement is undermining.the shorter version in Europe .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. BB753 says:
    @Gabriel M
    I guess you don't know what "worldwide" means.
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-poll-international-countries-uk-hillary-clinton-rcp-us-presidential-live-election-a7367591.html

    Trump is simply stunningly unpopular with Whites around the globe. For example, even though Trump is explicitly pro-Britain and Obama was implicitly anti-Britain, Hillary beats Trump 64-15. White people just believe in liberalism, with due exception for Conquest's first law. America is a massive outlier.

    Never trust polls.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. Karl says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    This is a very insightful and penetrating analysis.
     
    But what analysis? He poses a rhetorical question in the title, which has a fairly obvious answer, and then fails to provide the answer.

    The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad. Of course, there is hardly any real antisemitism in the West, at least in the sense of a hatred of Jews just for being Jews. The lack of antisemitism is a problem for them ideologically, not its presence.

    Generally speaking, the purpose of all the synthetic terrorist events in which Muslims are framed is a strategy of tension. The resulting tension is quite useful to the Zionist power structure. That it could lead to negative outcomes for the ordinary Jewish person in France is not really a consideration for them.

    MacDonald is in a class by himself.
     
    Actually, Professor MacDonald seems to be in a class by himself in terms of a bounded understanding of the world. There are things he understands extremely well and I have learned from his writing. However, there are other things, like false flag terrorism, that he simply does not seem to understand at all -- unless he is being disingenuous, which is a possibility I have considered.

    5 Jonathon Revusky> The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad.

    sorry, you don’t get to define Zionism. Zionists do.

    Zion must exist because we were commanded to live there. It is against OUR OWN rules to (permanently) live anyplace else.

    Very few people are more comfortably situated than American Jews, yet we throw money at the problem of trying to talk them into leaving America and moving here. I’m not even sure that having them here would really help, but if are going to bring in the Ethiopians (I had mixed feelings about that, but that’s a done deal), we should bring in the American Jews.

    I might have a secret plan to move the best of the GoodWhites to Freeholds in Samaria, in which case, I get define who a White person is. But anyplace else in the world, white people deine who they are. If they want to exclude some rather Aryan-looking Jews (there are plenty) – so be it. Self-determination is a thing.

    What’s going here under the surface is that whites can’t pull off a nationalist movement. They’re GREAT at talking about it….. but let there be a REAL white-ethnic country (eg, Sweden, Germany, Netherlands)…. and they will Somali-ize it all by themselves.

    When the wife of a beta fat slob fucks the pool boy, there’s two people at fault, and none of them are the pool boy.

    I don’t know if Rakhine people are good or bad, but I know that they do more than talk about building an ethno-state. Rakhines aren’t white, maybe that’s why they can spit in the face of the entire worldwide Muslim Ummah and not feel guilty about it.

    If we dispassionately look at it – the way an actuary or a commodities-speculator would look at it – guys like Jonathan Revusky cannot build nations that last.

    Fix THAT problem, John.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Karl,

    Zion must exist because we were commanded to live there. It is against OUR OWN rules to (permanently) live anyplace else.
     
    Question here - the siege and capture of Jerusalem and practically the lion's share of what is now Israel was completed by Sultan Saladin around 1187:
    http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/this-day-in-jewish-history/this-day-in-jewish-history-saladin-captures-jerusalem-from-the-crusaders-1.467797

    Rabbi Maimonides was alive for another 15 years or so after that - yet spent his life and died in Cairo/Fustat, Egypt.

    Did he completely miss out on that rule? His rulings were sought from the Jews of Yemen, North Africa, Levant, etc. Is there any proof he told Jewish people that they should go and live in that area now that the Crusaders had been kicked out and it was open for settlement because of the prohibition to live permanently elsewhere?


    Rakhines aren’t white, maybe that’s why they can spit in the face of the entire worldwide Muslim Ummah and not feel guilty about it.
     
    Yeah - it's really a shame a lot of the Chechens are caught up in extremism right now and on some stupid pipe-dream mission with Daesh. The Caucasians (Whites without guilt) have traditionally provided us with great shock troops to deal with this sort of thing.

    Peace.

    , @Clearpoint
    And the toilet must exist because you are commanded to shit. Feel free to call that little bit of Zion your anti-shitmantic safety valve, for use in those times when the proverbial shit hits the fan. I promise not to get territorial over the definition.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. Karl says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    "Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me."

    That sure seems likely to me. The message coming for Jews in the MSM is overwhelmingly one of anti-white hatred. Is that even worth debating?

    If Americans should defend themselves against Muslims, rampaging minorities and hordes of immigrants, how long until they decide that they should also protect themselves against Jews? Don't we all have a right to defend ourselves?

    22 Oilcan Floyd > Don’t we all have a right to defend ourselves?

    First you would need a set of balls that’s larger than your keyboard, Floyd.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    "First you would need a set of balls that’s larger than your keyboard, Floyd."

    That would be an awfully large set of balls! I guess I'm supposed to challenge you to a fight now? Is that how it works?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. Karl says:
    @reiner Tor
    So aren't Jews voting overwhelmingly against Republicans and even more overwhelmingly against Trump (i.e. the first nationalistic Republican for a very long time)? That needs some explanation in a world where whites (this includes Jews already) have overwhelmingly voted Republican. Especially since Jews are higher income, and until this very election higher income people tended to vote more Republican.

    So what is your explanation for this overwhelming support for multiculturalism even seemingly against their self-interest?

    Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.

    16 reiner Tor > Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.

    do ==you== intermarry with people you hate?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. @Anatoly Karlin

    Muslim immigrants, given their proneness to street crime and low academic achievement, are no threat to the elite status of Jews.
     
    Well, I think Kevin MacDonald adequately answers his own question here.

    To put it crisply, Jews are going to prosper more - at least in relative terms - in an 85 IQ Lebanized society than in a 100 IQ homogenous society.

    Second, one could argue that a few minor assaults every year on the poorer Jewish schmucks by angry Muslims might be preferable to living in everyday safety and security but running the very low but constant risk of an ethnic "existential risk" such a second Holocaust.

    To put it crisply, Jews are going to prosper more – at least in relative terms – in an 85 IQ Lebanized society than in a 100 IQ homogenous society.

    Wow, a few million Arab refugees coming into Germany, with a population of 80 million, will lower the average IQ 15 points, from something like 100 down to 85. Gee, I wonder what the average IQ of the Arabs coming in must be. Wow, like a negative number, eh?

    Second, one could argue that a few minor assaults every year on the poorer Jewish schmucks by angry Muslims

    Something like that is a feature, not a bug. In fact, if none of these “minor assaults” organically happen, Mossad will stage some synthetic events.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. @Gabriel M

    The vast majority of whites worldwide are clueless about Trump and what actually goes on in America.
     
    The vast majority of Jews are clueless about Trump and what actually goes on in America.

    They also don’t support the destruction of their own nations, families and cultures
     
    Of course, they don't "want" it, but they have voted for it persistently. No-one wants the bad consequences of the ideology they believe in.

    Multiculturalism and mass immigration are largely forced on whites.
     
    By Whites, who other whites vote for.

    If only whites were allowed to vote, Trump would have won by a popular landslide, and there would be no demographic change.
     
    As American Whites come closer to being a minority, they start voting like a minority, that is to say in blocks. Europeans will catch up, but in the meantime they vote for liberalism. Overwhelmingly white America voted in LBJ in a real landslide far dwarfing what Trump would have achieved among contemporary Whites.

    “The vast majority of Jews are clueless about Trump and what actually goes on in America.”

    Hence the shock by the MSM.

    “Of course, they don’t “want” it, but they have voted for it persistently. No-one wants the bad consequences of the ideology they believe in.”

    Whites have repeatedly voted against the Republican establishment in congressional elections, but have repeatedly been given the bait and switch by their representatives. That’s been going on for decades. The national party never offered up much of a candidate, which is why Obama won twice and Trump won this time. If the Republican presidents/majorities had done something for their constituents in the past 30+ years we’d have a far different country today.

    “Of course, they don’t “want” it, but they have voted for it persistently. No-one wants the bad consequences of the ideology they believe in.”

    Few whites vote for the bait and switch offered by our elites. Their ideology is not ours, which is why they never say what they believe, or what they will eventually do when running for office. Why else have the major parties traded turns at being thrown out of power en masse over and over in the last 3 decades?

    “By Whites, who other whites vote for.”

    Few whites would have ever voted for mass immigration, demographic change or multiculturalism if given the choice. We’ve just reached the point where the elites can’t lie anymore.

    “As American Whites come closer to being a minority, they start voting like a minority, that is to say in blocks. Europeans will catch up, but in the meantime they vote for liberalism. Overwhelmingly white America voted in LBJ in a real landslide far dwarfing what Trump would have achieved among contemporary Whites.”

    Whites have always voted their interests, just along regional lines. Nobody ever got to vote on immigration and multiculturalism. Those things were always pushed behind the scenes. LBJ was rejected to the point that he refused to run for a final term. And LBJ didn’t exactly present himself as a war-monger and anti-white.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. @Gabriel M

    So what is your explanation for this overwhelming support for multiculturalism even seemingly against their self-interest?

    Ethnic hatred of white gentiles seems like a good explanation to me.
     
    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.

    So, according to you, white people have an ethnic hatred of white people.

    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.

    Uhh, yeah, and they came about these views independently, eh? Like, no mention of who dominates the media, higher education, Hollywood, i.e. all the institutions that define “respectable” public opinion, that largely form the mental world that people live in.

    No, everybody just thought about it independently and came to these conclusions. Whatever…

    Oh, by the way, Gabe, how’s that rebuttal of my latest article coming along? I suppose it will be really devastating, like the rebuttals you wrote of my previous articles, eh?

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Multiculturalism is just a code-word for anti-white. And no most whites worldwide do not support it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. @Karl
    22 Oilcan Floyd > Don’t we all have a right to defend ourselves?


    First you would need a set of balls that's larger than your keyboard, Floyd.

    “First you would need a set of balls that’s larger than your keyboard, Floyd.”

    That would be an awfully large set of balls! I guess I’m supposed to challenge you to a fight now? Is that how it works?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. @jacques sheete

    And it’s the fact that Jews were sometimes denied the ability to flee Hitler’s Germany.
     
    Glad you said, "sometimes."

    They were, in fact, encouraged to leave Germany and it wasn't easy to find a place to go. In fact, those who went to England could expect to wind up in concentration camps within the Brit empire (e.g., at York and the Isle of Man), and to be shipped to Canada and Australia.

    Churchill’s “collar the lot” order was understood to refer to all German/Axis refugees (and potential fifth-columnists) in the Isles. Obviously, given the circumstances, lots of them were Jews. The key criterion was being a recent arrival from Germany and the like.
    The wife’s great-uncle, for ex., just carried on working on top-secret radio stuff as per. In naval uniform. Seeing as his ‘educated Brummie’ accent (like Enoch Powell) lent him an air of plausibility on the “one of us” front. Sound fellow; I had the great good fortune to inspect his attic and shed full of the most fantastic contraptions and souvenirs shortly before he died, including a very rare giant glass thermionic valve thingie that was something to do with the first attempts at radar. Maybe?. All went in the skip/dumpster after the funeral, I think.
    The IoM wasn’t horrific (well apart from actually being the Isle of Man, fair enough), or all that long. One notable torture was to let a prominent German (?-Jewish?) archaeology professor teach the Brits how to excavate properly, using local Iron Age and other sites to demonstrate. With picnics. The utter beasts!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. KenH says:

    As a result, the consensus view among Jews seems to be that the transformation of the West is manageable.

    I definitely think this is the case. Even as Western nations get torn asunder by insane multicultural policies put in place largely by diaspora Jewish influence, they feel that they will be able to stay above the fray and use their power to manipulate events and the disparate racial groups to their own group advantage. But I think they are wrong.

    Diaspora Jews are playing a dangerous game of Russian roulette in supporting mass third world immigration into the West.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  46. anon says: • Disclaimer

    As this article clearly shows, Jews have a great deal to answer for. I have to believe that some day all this duplicity of playing both ends against the middle is going to backfire on them. In many ways organized Jewry is its own worst enemy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  47. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Jonathan Revusky

    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.
     
    Uhh, yeah, and they came about these views independently, eh? Like, no mention of who dominates the media, higher education, Hollywood, i.e. all the institutions that define "respectable" public opinion, that largely form the mental world that people live in.

    No, everybody just thought about it independently and came to these conclusions. Whatever...

    Oh, by the way, Gabe, how's that rebuttal of my latest article coming along? I suppose it will be really devastating, like the rebuttals you wrote of my previous articles, eh?

    Multiculturalism is just a code-word for anti-white. And no most whites worldwide do not support it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. Terrorism, after all is a strategy pursued by non-elite groups.

    This statement is completely wrong. Terrorism, particularly false flag terrorism, is something that the Zionists clearly specialize in. In fact, to be carried off successfully, a prerequisite is substantial control of the media. Remember how everybody knew for certain that Osama Bin Laden was behind 9/11 within a day.

    An elite group like American Jews pursue their interests in the MSM, the legislative process, and the judicial system—top-down influence that is far more compatible with oligarchy than democracy. (An oligarchic model fits U.S. politics much better than a democratic model

    Well, I am increasingly convinced that an oligarchic model, with different competing power factions, which is what the Western so-called “democracies” really are — this is the environment in which synthetic events such as false flag terrorism flourish.

    What Professor MacDonald is saying is probably about 180 degrees away from the truth here. What is strange is that he is still the go-to guy on certain topics that relate to the Judaeo-Zionist power structure. It is very strange the extent of bounded awareness he shows.

    Read More
    • Replies: @L.K
    Professor MacDonald:

    Terrorism, after all is a strategy pursued by non-elite groups.
     
    J.R's reaction:

    This statement is completely wrong. Terrorism, particularly false flag terrorism, is something that the Zionists clearly specialize in.
     
    I too cringed when I read that line by Prof.MacDonald.
    Ridiculous really.
    For one thing, State terrorism is much more destructive than non State terror and for another thing, ZUSA, Israel, England and others are all supporters of non state terror groups.
    In fact, there would be no ISIS without ZUSA.
    The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom – noted:

    Because the United States itself has a long record of supporting terrorists and using terrorist tactics, the slogans of today’s war on terrorism merely makes the United States look hypocritical to the rest of the world.

     

    Odom also said:

    By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.
     
    The Washington Post reported in 2010:

    The United States has long been an exporter of terrorism, according to a secret CIA analysis released Wednesday by the Web site WikiLeaks.
     
    , @L.K
    Hey J.Revusky,

    Although Corbett, Sibel et al., also have their own no go zones – how can anyone seriously discuss all this stuff going on in the Mena region without mentioning the Zios?? – they do bring up a lot of interesting points to the table in the following debate:
    Who Is REALLY Behind the EU Migrant Crisis?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzPiZSw3FP0
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. HBM says:

    Jews love freedom of movement because they want frictionless, borderless merchanting for maximum wealth extraction from goyim for themselves and for unimpeded fleeing when the host finally wakes up and turns on them.

    They also purportedly love immigrants because of Judaism’s true origins in the phony tale of the “Returners from Exile”; and they compulsively repeat this trope endlessly, but having cast themselves in the role of the “Returners” fixing (read: transforming) the local population wherever they go.

    After the Jews and their typical behaviors started a civil war in ancient Alexandria in 41AD, Emperor Claudius wrote a letter to the the inhabitants of the city:

    “Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, Imperator, Pontifex Maximus, Holder of the Tribunician Power, Consul Designate, to the City of the Alexandrians, greeting [...]

    As for the question , which party was responsible for the riots and feud (or rather, if the truth be told, the war) with the Jews [...] I was unwilling to make a strict inquiry, though guarding within me a store of immutable indignation against whichever party renews the conflict.

    And I tell you once and for all that unless you put a stop to this ruinous and obstinate enmity against each other, I shall be driven to show what a benevolent Prince can be when turned to righteous indignation [...] On the one hand, the Alexandrians [should] show themselves forebearing and kindly towards the Jews who for many years have dwelt in the same city, and dishonor none of the rites observed by them in the worship of their god, but allow them to observe their customs as in the time of the Deified Augustus, which customs I also, after hearing both sides, have sanctioned.

    And on the other hand, I explicitly order the Jews not to agitate for more privileges than they formerly possessed, and not in the future to send out a separate embassy as though they lived in a separate city (a thing unprecedented), and not to force their way into gymnastic games, while enjoying their own privileges and sharing a great abundance of advantages in a city not their own, and not to bring in or admit Jews who come down the river from Egypt or from Syria, a proceeding which will compel me to conceive serious suspicions.

    Otherwise I will by all means take vengeance on them as fomenters of which is a general plague infecting the whole world. If, desisting from these courses, you consent to live with mutual forebearance and kindliness, I on my side will exercise a solicitude of very long standing for the city, as one which is bound to us by traditional friendship.

    Farewell.”

    Clearly Claudius’ suspicions weren’t strong enough.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  50. Jelco says:

    Sound’s like the creation of the perfect “false flag”, this one will be years in the making. Israel will have created an ennemy, that will sound so “anti-semite” when in fact it will be anti-zionist; creating a backlash in the european population, against the “muslim world”. And people are going to fall for it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  51. @joe webb
    I am unable to perceive a conclusion here. The jews need to be able leave any country. OK. Whites are a far greater danger to Jews than a few muslims.ok White guilt can be tapped and it is good to keep whites feeling guilty, especially about jews. OK. Lawrence Auster says that exclusion policies could be used against jews. OK. Curbs on free speech is a jewish goal and curbing anti muslim speech by whites is good for the Jews, since it can be used to keep hostile White sentiment toward jews under control as well. OK.

    1."As a result, the consensus view among Jews seems to be that the transformation of the West is manageable." 2. yet, that Muslim votes here in the US could become a dangerous factor. 3. that the Dem Party is about split now on Israel. 3. Jews are worried. OK.

    The fundamental question , per the title, is why jews support muslim immigration. I don't think you have completely covered it.

    First, America, the most Protestant Nation of all Protestant Nations, and the only one that takes its religion seriously, in NEVER going to abandon the holy jews. That can be seen at every level of social and political and media reality, especially Fox News. Trump could be a joker, but I doubt it.

    Second, the chances of large muslim voting is nearly nil. When T. and the American populace, not the liberals, get done with it, the muzzies will be lucky if they can stay, let alone vote. However , again, Protestantism and even the Catholics now, luv the jews. It may be that only casual religious folks and the non-religious will really get straight with the jews. That does not mean that the Jewish Wars cannot be stopped. Trump has got himself in the hard place/rock place with his words so far re Israel and Isis, and so on.

    Third, like you said right off the bat, jews hate whites far far more than muzzies...in the US of course. The old Divide and Conquer strategy, taking up the Negroes as a holy Oppressed people and getting us Whites to fight over it, that is fundamental to jewish strategies here. Same thing can apply to muzzies, but will likely Not be at all successful, except for jewyorktimes and hollywood.

    Therefore, jews are stuck with their race equality song and dance, despite the obvious hypocrisy with regard to the Judenstaat. This is overlooked by Whites because of holocaust stories and religion. Jews get to be the great exception to consistency in the immigration wars. God wants them to be exempt from criticism of any type. but nothing lasts forever.

    So it remains Divide Whites and Conquer them. Nevertheless, anti-Jew feeling is mounting and all these jewish shenanigans are eroding their privileged place
    in the White psyche, especially among young folks and Dem Party anti-zionist folks.

    As Thomas Mann put it in Dr. Faustus (I think it was) "you jews are soon to be in real jewish
    trouble.'

    Joe Webb

    What a racist, small minded and delusional rant.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. utu says:

    Voltaire the Anti-Semite:

    “The Kaffirs, the Hottentots, and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and more honest people than your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables, in bad conduct, and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny.”

    “They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gabriel M
    LOL

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reign_of_Terror
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Wally says: • Website
    @joe webb
    I am unable to perceive a conclusion here. The jews need to be able leave any country. OK. Whites are a far greater danger to Jews than a few muslims.ok White guilt can be tapped and it is good to keep whites feeling guilty, especially about jews. OK. Lawrence Auster says that exclusion policies could be used against jews. OK. Curbs on free speech is a jewish goal and curbing anti muslim speech by whites is good for the Jews, since it can be used to keep hostile White sentiment toward jews under control as well. OK.

    1."As a result, the consensus view among Jews seems to be that the transformation of the West is manageable." 2. yet, that Muslim votes here in the US could become a dangerous factor. 3. that the Dem Party is about split now on Israel. 3. Jews are worried. OK.

    The fundamental question , per the title, is why jews support muslim immigration. I don't think you have completely covered it.

    First, America, the most Protestant Nation of all Protestant Nations, and the only one that takes its religion seriously, in NEVER going to abandon the holy jews. That can be seen at every level of social and political and media reality, especially Fox News. Trump could be a joker, but I doubt it.

    Second, the chances of large muslim voting is nearly nil. When T. and the American populace, not the liberals, get done with it, the muzzies will be lucky if they can stay, let alone vote. However , again, Protestantism and even the Catholics now, luv the jews. It may be that only casual religious folks and the non-religious will really get straight with the jews. That does not mean that the Jewish Wars cannot be stopped. Trump has got himself in the hard place/rock place with his words so far re Israel and Isis, and so on.

    Third, like you said right off the bat, jews hate whites far far more than muzzies...in the US of course. The old Divide and Conquer strategy, taking up the Negroes as a holy Oppressed people and getting us Whites to fight over it, that is fundamental to jewish strategies here. Same thing can apply to muzzies, but will likely Not be at all successful, except for jewyorktimes and hollywood.

    Therefore, jews are stuck with their race equality song and dance, despite the obvious hypocrisy with regard to the Judenstaat. This is overlooked by Whites because of holocaust stories and religion. Jews get to be the great exception to consistency in the immigration wars. God wants them to be exempt from criticism of any type. but nothing lasts forever.

    So it remains Divide Whites and Conquer them. Nevertheless, anti-Jew feeling is mounting and all these jewish shenanigans are eroding their privileged place
    in the White psyche, especially among young folks and Dem Party anti-zionist folks.

    As Thomas Mann put it in Dr. Faustus (I think it was) "you jews are soon to be in real jewish
    trouble.'

    Joe Webb

    The only reason the average American is more likely to agree with Israel is because they’ve had their head filled with various absurd fictions such as ‘holocau$t’ propaganda, “Judeo-Christian values”, and Jews being a uniquely righteous, exceptional, and persecuted people.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    Jewish ‘law’ / Jewish supremacism / psychosis of Judaism / treatment of Christians

    Why have supremacist Jews have been marketing the ’6,000,000′ lie since at least 1869?

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    I just got off the phone with a friend who loves my stuff but is religious, and says that the only thing about which he disagrees with me is Israel. Serious Protestant. He agrees that just abut everything I say about the Jews is true...BUT...God's wayward children, etc.

    I don't know why the average anti-semite and race realist refuses to recognize this HUGE FACT about American Christians. It is so obvious to those with familiarity with Christianity, especially Protestants, and their zealous little brothers...fundamentalilsts, and Scofield Bible types.

    I admit, as a non-religious person, that I had to be informed by E. Michael Jones and his The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, which I hold in high regard. HIs several hundred pages on the Reformation is chock full of great evidence of jewish subversion....the Luther, Calvin types went back to the OT and used it as a club against Rome. Sola Scriptura is the Protestant claim, and a huge amount of their writing , is about the OT and the Jews.

    If you go to the average Catholic service here in the SF Bay area, Per a Catholic friend of mine, there is always a reading from the OT, and maybe a couple from the NT.

    IF you know anything about the Puritans ....they were more or less jewish zealots, and thought the Amerindians were one of the lost tribes of Israel. This shows up in Hawthorne's novel, The Scarlet Letter. Of course, Hester Prynne laughed.

    I would be interested if there is another book on the jews and Protestantism besides Jones' book.

    Joe Webb
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Muslim immigrants, given their proneness to street crime and low academic achievement, are no threat to the elite status of Jews.
     
    Well, I think Kevin MacDonald adequately answers his own question here.

    To put it crisply, Jews are going to prosper more - at least in relative terms - in an 85 IQ Lebanized society than in a 100 IQ homogenous society.

    Second, one could argue that a few minor assaults every year on the poorer Jewish schmucks by angry Muslims might be preferable to living in everyday safety and security but running the very low but constant risk of an ethnic "existential risk" such a second Holocaust.

    Dear Anatoly,
    You must think of yourself as a genius. Is it not said somewhere that such mentality is the surest sign of a moron?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. joe webb says:
    @Wally
    The only reason the average American is more likely to agree with Israel is because they’ve had their head filled with various absurd fictions such as 'holocau$t' propaganda, “Judeo-Christian values”, and Jews being a uniquely righteous, exceptional, and persecuted people.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Jewish 'law' / Jewish supremacism / psychosis of Judaism / treatment of Christians

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIcHyDjZNYE

    Why have supremacist Jews have been marketing the '6,000,000' lie since at least 1869?

    http://i1117.photobucket.com/albums/k598/WhiteWolf722/TheSixMillionMyth.jpg

    I just got off the phone with a friend who loves my stuff but is religious, and says that the only thing about which he disagrees with me is Israel. Serious Protestant. He agrees that just abut everything I say about the Jews is true…BUT…God’s wayward children, etc.

    I don’t know why the average anti-semite and race realist refuses to recognize this HUGE FACT about American Christians. It is so obvious to those with familiarity with Christianity, especially Protestants, and their zealous little brothers…fundamentalilsts, and Scofield Bible types.

    I admit, as a non-religious person, that I had to be informed by E. Michael Jones and his The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, which I hold in high regard. HIs several hundred pages on the Reformation is chock full of great evidence of jewish subversion….the Luther, Calvin types went back to the OT and used it as a club against Rome. Sola Scriptura is the Protestant claim, and a huge amount of their writing , is about the OT and the Jews.

    If you go to the average Catholic service here in the SF Bay area, Per a Catholic friend of mine, there is always a reading from the OT, and maybe a couple from the NT.

    IF you know anything about the Puritans ….they were more or less jewish zealots, and thought the Amerindians were one of the lost tribes of Israel. This shows up in Hawthorne’s novel, The Scarlet Letter. Of course, Hester Prynne laughed.

    I would be interested if there is another book on the jews and Protestantism besides Jones’ book.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. Svigor says:

    European populations are Jews’ favorite hosts, by far. Keeping them from getting uppity is priority #1 for diaspora Jews. Divide and rule would hardly be a surprise to anyone who has seen how slaveholding elites worked in the past.

    Muslim immigrants, given their proneness to street crime and low academic achievement, are no threat to the elite status of Jews. Nor are they a threat to the current oligarchical power structure of Western societies, an unholy alliance between large donors, politicians, and MSM and academia elites.

    And let’s face it, Muslims over here have hardly gone out of their way to target Jews, since 9/11. I wouldn’t be surprised if some of them felt a sort of quid pro quo was in place: Jews keep the borders open, Muslims kill them last.

    Now when Jews put together the idea that “any social prejudice or exclusion directed against Jews leads potentially to Auschwitz” with the idea that “all bigotry is indivisible,” they must reach the conclusion that any exclusion of any group, no matter how alien it may be to the host society, is a potential Auschwitz.

    So there it is. We have identified the core Jewish conviction that makes Jews keep pushing relentlessly for mass immigration, even the mass immigration of their deadliest enemies. In the thought-process of Jews, to keep Jew-hating Muslims out of America would feed exclusionary attitudes among America’s white Gentile majority that could result in another Jewish Holocaust . Why Jews welcome Muslims The View from the Right, December 9, 2002.

    If Israel didn’t exist, this would be a lot more plausible. Israel is run by and for Jews. Israel has loads of prejudice and exclusion vs. non-Jews. The Jewish bigotry there is indivisible. Somewhere in there, there has to be a “but it’s great when Jews do it.” Auster wasn’t so good at full disclosure.

    Anti-Israel attitudes are quite common in the Democratic Party— a recent Pew Poll of Democrats found a near-even split, 33% favoring Israel, 31% favoring the Palestinians

    That the Democrats are evenly split over what to think of the west’s most oppressive state, Apartheid Israel, is an astounding PR coup for Zionists. I wonder how long they can keep it up?

    First, America, the most Protestant Nation of all Protestant Nations, and the only one that takes its religion seriously, in NEVER going to abandon the holy jews. That can be seen at every level of social and political and media reality, especially Fox News. Trump could be a joker, but I doubt it.

    Jews don’t buy that. They know themselves too well, in their own, twisted way (it’s all denial and projection and retconned history and BS, but it’s there, if you look).

    “Given that Jewish organizations do not promote anti-Jewish immigration to Israel—or, indeed, any non-Jewish immigration to Israel”

    sad to say, that is not correct.

    Affluent north Tel Aviv is full of leftists who think its fabulous to retain thousands of wetback muslim africans…. in the poor neighborhoods of south Tel Aviv, of course.

    Would you name a few powerful Jewish organizations that promote anti-Jewish or even non-Jewish immigration to Israel? Because I can name quite a few that don’t (but it would be quicker to just say “organized Jewry”), but are just fine with the current, fascist Israeli immigration policies.

    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.

    So, according to you, white people have an ethnic hatred of white people.

    You tried to dodge, but failed. A solid majority of White Americans voted for Trump. 71% of American Jews voted for Hillary.

    Unless your point was that Jews are like a foreign body in America – that makes sense.

    On the other hand, the supposedly liberal Europe you’re referring to is far Whiter than America. It’s much easier to play with other people’s money. Meanwhile, Europe has seen a slow but steady rise of the anti-Open Borders right (far bigger than anything in America), in response to much smaller demographic invasions than America is facing. Maybe it’s because we have so many more Jews than they do…

    do ==you== intermarry with people you hate?

    1. The very term, “intermarriage” is an indication of Jewish ethnocentrism. It refers to something (people from one White ethnic group marrying people from other White ethnic groups) that nobody else even has a word for. French marries English, whoop-te-doo! But Jews have a word for it, their version of “miscegenation,” I suppose. They keep track of this stuff. No one else does.

    2. Guess what? The Jewish “intermarriage” rate is waaaaaay lower than that for the rest of White America. I’d guess no more than half; at least 90% of the rest of White America “intermarries” without a word said about it. They’d look at you funny if you held out your White ethnic group’s “intermarriage” rate as proof of high-mindedness.

    3. The way you guys say this shows your ethnocentrism. My, shouldn’t we all be so very grateful for the “intermarriage” of the lofty Jews?

    4. Barry Bonds is an anti-White racist, and he married a White woman. I’m sure many a slaveholder banged his slaves, and a few no doubt married them. I bet their attitudes toward their slaves in general had a lot to do with how “uppity” they found them. I find a lot of similarity in how Jews approach Whites. They’re all peaches and cream, as long as the Goyim are tame. But when they get uppity, it’s time for the whip.

    Name one.

    I have a theory for the behaviour of Jewish Liberal elites: they believe in liberalism.

    I also have a theory for the behaviour of non-Jewish Liberal elites: they believe in liberalism.

    But where’s the fun in that?

    I have a theory for why Jews want to suppress Mein Kampf: because Hitler mentioned how every day is a new day when you’re arguing with a Jew. None of the ass-kicking you gave them yesterday is acknowledged; they just pretend everything starts out at 0 again. This is the mark of a liar, and it’s why Jew-wise people tend to treat Jews like natural-born liars; they get tired of all the lying. Ethnocentrism overrides everything for a great many Jews: morality, honor, dignity, decency, self-respect…

    The problem with your theory is Apartheid Israel, and the phony-leftist Jewish diaspora’s die-hard support for her.

    5 Jonathon Revusky> The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad.

    sorry, you don’t get to define Zionism. Zionists do.

    Nope. Zionists define “Nazism,” “Race-realism,” and everything else they please, so I define Zionism. Get your Zionists in line first, and we’ll reciprocate. Good luck.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gabriel M

    You tried to dodge, but failed. A solid majority of White Americans voted for Trump. 71% of American Jews voted for Hillary.

    Unless your point was that Jews are like a foreign body in America – that makes sense.
     
    Actually, yes. Jews, along with coastal liberals, are much more in tune with global-white opinion than heartland American Whites, who are an extreme outlier, thoroughly despised by their fellow Whites. I, of course, sympathise, being from another group who is a target for their hatred.

    I have a theory for why Jews want to suppress Mein Kampf: because Hitler mentioned how every day is a new day when you’re arguing with a Jew. None of the ass-kicking you gave them yesterday is acknowledged; they just pretend everything starts out at 0 again. This is the mark of a liar, and it’s why Jew-wise people tend to treat Jews like natural-born liars; they get tired of all the lying. Ethnocentrism overrides everything for a great many Jews: morality, honor, dignity, decency, self-respect…
     
    You're starting to sound like Revusky now. Calm down.
    , @Karl
    56 Svigor > Would you name a few powerful Jewish organizations that promote anti-Jewish or even non-Jewish immigration to Israel?


    I can name Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.

    Yes, they're quite active in North america - after all that's where the donors LIVE.... but they also are actively in court here, trying to prevent Sudanese from being deported.

    Their donors love Negroes, and HIAS knows which side its bread is buttered on.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. Svigor says:

    Dear Anatoly,
    You must think of yourself as a genius. Is it not said somewhere that such mentality is the surest sign of a moron?

    Dear nobody,
    You must be a wife-beater. Is it not said that wife-beating is the surest sign of a small dick?

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Overestimated your genius. Wrong on both counts.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @iffen
    Well, actually I do know what worldwide means. It's just that the 63% and 53% are what concern me. My connections to those worldwide "white people" are problematic. There are some elections ahead this year in other "white people" countries; we may see interesting results. Just because I'm not an anti-Semite doesn't mean that I'm not a patriot.

    ” Just because I’m not an antisemite, doesn’t mean I’m not a patriot.

    Throughout your entire life, you and every American, have been brainwashed into believing the Jewish definition of what anti Semitism is.

    Truthful Definition: An Anti Semite is someone who is hated by Jews for exposing the negative impact they have had on the US economy (Goldman and Sachs, Berni Madoff, and the Federal Reserve), on politics (AIPAC’s control of Congress and the Executive Branch) on Academia (Holohoax and Jewish Bolshevism) on Hollywood (decadence and warmongering) on Supreme Court (40% Jewish liberalism) on Foreign policy
    ( NeoCons and Iraq war and war on terrorism) Flase Flag attacks (King David Hotel, the USS Liberty.) on the treat to humanity (Sampson Option) on Freedom of Speech (anti BDS laws and criminalizing Holocaust Revision)

    Read Charles Lindbergh last speech and find out why he established the American First Party. This will help you with why there is so much antisemitism in the US. You will also learn what Patriotism is and what it means to be a Patriot of the US.

    What is the main objectives of the UNZ Review. Isn’t to compile a list of all of the US anti Semite PATRIOTS for the ADL?

    Lastly, the Jewish religion and race has nothing to do with Antisemitism.
    Antisemitism and Patriotism is a natural response to US Jews and international Jewry ‘s behavior.

    Keith

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. Wally says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad.
     
    If this were true there would be no Chosenites in lands which are hostile to or uninterested in Jewish Supremaicism, like Iran and eastern Europe. Israel is really more like a staging ground for their bad behavior, a sort of bunker where ideas and resources stolen from the enemy can be held.

    ” Israel is really more like a staging ground for their bad behavior, a sort of bunker where ideas and resources stolen from the enemy can be held.”

    You nailed it.

    Think Israeli / ‘Russian’ oligarchs, think Israeli military industries, think Israeli software companies, think Israeli anything.

    They are commonly described as parasites for good reason.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. @joe webb
    I am unable to perceive a conclusion here. The jews need to be able leave any country. OK. Whites are a far greater danger to Jews than a few muslims.ok White guilt can be tapped and it is good to keep whites feeling guilty, especially about jews. OK. Lawrence Auster says that exclusion policies could be used against jews. OK. Curbs on free speech is a jewish goal and curbing anti muslim speech by whites is good for the Jews, since it can be used to keep hostile White sentiment toward jews under control as well. OK.

    1."As a result, the consensus view among Jews seems to be that the transformation of the West is manageable." 2. yet, that Muslim votes here in the US could become a dangerous factor. 3. that the Dem Party is about split now on Israel. 3. Jews are worried. OK.

    The fundamental question , per the title, is why jews support muslim immigration. I don't think you have completely covered it.

    First, America, the most Protestant Nation of all Protestant Nations, and the only one that takes its religion seriously, in NEVER going to abandon the holy jews. That can be seen at every level of social and political and media reality, especially Fox News. Trump could be a joker, but I doubt it.

    Second, the chances of large muslim voting is nearly nil. When T. and the American populace, not the liberals, get done with it, the muzzies will be lucky if they can stay, let alone vote. However , again, Protestantism and even the Catholics now, luv the jews. It may be that only casual religious folks and the non-religious will really get straight with the jews. That does not mean that the Jewish Wars cannot be stopped. Trump has got himself in the hard place/rock place with his words so far re Israel and Isis, and so on.

    Third, like you said right off the bat, jews hate whites far far more than muzzies...in the US of course. The old Divide and Conquer strategy, taking up the Negroes as a holy Oppressed people and getting us Whites to fight over it, that is fundamental to jewish strategies here. Same thing can apply to muzzies, but will likely Not be at all successful, except for jewyorktimes and hollywood.

    Therefore, jews are stuck with their race equality song and dance, despite the obvious hypocrisy with regard to the Judenstaat. This is overlooked by Whites because of holocaust stories and religion. Jews get to be the great exception to consistency in the immigration wars. God wants them to be exempt from criticism of any type. but nothing lasts forever.

    So it remains Divide Whites and Conquer them. Nevertheless, anti-Jew feeling is mounting and all these jewish shenanigans are eroding their privileged place
    in the White psyche, especially among young folks and Dem Party anti-zionist folks.

    As Thomas Mann put it in Dr. Faustus (I think it was) "you jews are soon to be in real jewish
    trouble.'

    Joe Webb

    America the most Protestant nation? Rubbish. The Scandinavian countries and Scotland, probably the whole UK, are more Protestant although they are indeed a lot less enthusiastic about religion than the US.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hibernian
    Ratio of Protestant to Catholic Presidents: 44 to 1. Scandinavian nations might be called the most Protestant based on %age of the population which is Protestant. Scotland or the entire UK? A lot of Irish Catholic immigrants and their descendants there, including, I think, 3 of the 4 Lads from Liverpool (or maybe 3 1/2, I'm not sure about Harrison.) I'm not sure but I think Sean Connery and Rod Stewart may be relatives of mine.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. Svigor says:

    I just got off the phone with a friend who loves my stuff but is religious, and says that the only thing about which he disagrees with me is Israel. Serious Protestant. He agrees that just abut everything I say about the Jews is true…BUT…God’s wayward children, etc.

    Sounds kind of like a heretic. There is nothing inherently better about God’s wayward Jewish children, than about God’s wayward human children in general. They deserve no special treatment. The special treatment ended when Christ took away their mojo, and gave it to humanity.

    On the contrary, one might say that God’s wayward children who haven’t spent the last 2000 years rejecting His offerings, deserve more regard.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  62. Svigor says:

    Since the edit window is still a few minutes too short:

    I just got off the phone with a friend who loves my stuff but is religious, and says that the only thing about which he disagrees with me is Israel. Serious Protestant. He agrees that just abut everything I say about the Jews is true…BUT…God’s wayward children, etc.

    Sounds kind of like a heretic (who doesn’t know Israel Covenant was dissolved, and Christendom is now Israel). There is nothing inherently better about God’s wayward Jewish children, than about God’s wayward human children in general. They deserve no special treatment. The special treatment ended when Christ took away their mojo, and gave it to humanity.

    On the contrary, one might say that God’s wayward children who haven’t spent the last 2000 years rejecting His offerings, deserve more regard.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  63. mcohen says:

    I love these bait articles in unz.brings all the worms out of the hole

    If there was no oil in the middle east there would be no refugees.
    The 1000 rabbis are attempting to heal this wound.

    Here is the connection

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleppo_Codex

    Unfortunately one of the other consequences of the middle east oil wars is the loss of jewish communities in places like Aleppo.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  64. Gabriel M says:
    @Svigor
    European populations are Jews' favorite hosts, by far. Keeping them from getting uppity is priority #1 for diaspora Jews. Divide and rule would hardly be a surprise to anyone who has seen how slaveholding elites worked in the past.

    Muslim immigrants, given their proneness to street crime and low academic achievement, are no threat to the elite status of Jews. Nor are they a threat to the current oligarchical power structure of Western societies, an unholy alliance between large donors, politicians, and MSM and academia elites.
     
    And let's face it, Muslims over here have hardly gone out of their way to target Jews, since 9/11. I wouldn't be surprised if some of them felt a sort of quid pro quo was in place: Jews keep the borders open, Muslims kill them last.

    Now when Jews put together the idea that “any social prejudice or exclusion directed against Jews leads potentially to Auschwitz” with the idea that “all bigotry is indivisible,” they must reach the conclusion that any exclusion of any group, no matter how alien it may be to the host society, is a potential Auschwitz.

    So there it is. We have identified the core Jewish conviction that makes Jews keep pushing relentlessly for mass immigration, even the mass immigration of their deadliest enemies. In the thought-process of Jews, to keep Jew-hating Muslims out of America would feed exclusionary attitudes among America’s white Gentile majority that could result in another Jewish Holocaust . Why Jews welcome Muslims The View from the Right, December 9, 2002.
     
    If Israel didn't exist, this would be a lot more plausible. Israel is run by and for Jews. Israel has loads of prejudice and exclusion vs. non-Jews. The Jewish bigotry there is indivisible. Somewhere in there, there has to be a "but it's great when Jews do it." Auster wasn't so good at full disclosure.

    Anti-Israel attitudes are quite common in the Democratic Party— a recent Pew Poll of Democrats found a near-even split, 33% favoring Israel, 31% favoring the Palestinians
     
    That the Democrats are evenly split over what to think of the west's most oppressive state, Apartheid Israel, is an astounding PR coup for Zionists. I wonder how long they can keep it up?

    First, America, the most Protestant Nation of all Protestant Nations, and the only one that takes its religion seriously, in NEVER going to abandon the holy jews. That can be seen at every level of social and political and media reality, especially Fox News. Trump could be a joker, but I doubt it.
     
    Jews don't buy that. They know themselves too well, in their own, twisted way (it's all denial and projection and retconned history and BS, but it's there, if you look).

    "Given that Jewish organizations do not promote anti-Jewish immigration to Israel—or, indeed, any non-Jewish immigration to Israel"

    sad to say, that is not correct.

    Affluent north Tel Aviv is full of leftists who think its fabulous to retain thousands of wetback muslim africans…. in the poor neighborhoods of south Tel Aviv, of course.
     
    Would you name a few powerful Jewish organizations that promote anti-Jewish or even non-Jewish immigration to Israel? Because I can name quite a few that don't (but it would be quicker to just say "organized Jewry"), but are just fine with the current, fascist Israeli immigration policies.

    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.

    So, according to you, white people have an ethnic hatred of white people.
     
    You tried to dodge, but failed. A solid majority of White Americans voted for Trump. 71% of American Jews voted for Hillary.

    Unless your point was that Jews are like a foreign body in America - that makes sense.

    On the other hand, the supposedly liberal Europe you're referring to is far Whiter than America. It's much easier to play with other people's money. Meanwhile, Europe has seen a slow but steady rise of the anti-Open Borders right (far bigger than anything in America), in response to much smaller demographic invasions than America is facing. Maybe it's because we have so many more Jews than they do...

    do ==you== intermarry with people you hate?
     
    1. The very term, "intermarriage" is an indication of Jewish ethnocentrism. It refers to something (people from one White ethnic group marrying people from other White ethnic groups) that nobody else even has a word for. French marries English, whoop-te-doo! But Jews have a word for it, their version of "miscegenation," I suppose. They keep track of this stuff. No one else does.

    2. Guess what? The Jewish "intermarriage" rate is waaaaaay lower than that for the rest of White America. I'd guess no more than half; at least 90% of the rest of White America "intermarries" without a word said about it. They'd look at you funny if you held out your White ethnic group's "intermarriage" rate as proof of high-mindedness.

    3. The way you guys say this shows your ethnocentrism. My, shouldn't we all be so very grateful for the "intermarriage" of the lofty Jews?

    4. Barry Bonds is an anti-White racist, and he married a White woman. I'm sure many a slaveholder banged his slaves, and a few no doubt married them. I bet their attitudes toward their slaves in general had a lot to do with how "uppity" they found them. I find a lot of similarity in how Jews approach Whites. They're all peaches and cream, as long as the Goyim are tame. But when they get uppity, it's time for the whip.

    Name one.

    I have a theory for the behaviour of Jewish Liberal elites: they believe in liberalism.

    I also have a theory for the behaviour of non-Jewish Liberal elites: they believe in liberalism.

    But where’s the fun in that?
     
    I have a theory for why Jews want to suppress Mein Kampf: because Hitler mentioned how every day is a new day when you're arguing with a Jew. None of the ass-kicking you gave them yesterday is acknowledged; they just pretend everything starts out at 0 again. This is the mark of a liar, and it's why Jew-wise people tend to treat Jews like natural-born liars; they get tired of all the lying. Ethnocentrism overrides everything for a great many Jews: morality, honor, dignity, decency, self-respect...

    The problem with your theory is Apartheid Israel, and the phony-leftist Jewish diaspora's die-hard support for her.

    5 Jonathon Revusky> The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad.

    sorry, you don’t get to define Zionism. Zionists do.
     
    Nope. Zionists define "Nazism," "Race-realism," and everything else they please, so I define Zionism. Get your Zionists in line first, and we'll reciprocate. Good luck.

    You tried to dodge, but failed. A solid majority of White Americans voted for Trump. 71% of American Jews voted for Hillary.

    Unless your point was that Jews are like a foreign body in America – that makes sense.

    Actually, yes. Jews, along with coastal liberals, are much more in tune with global-white opinion than heartland American Whites, who are an extreme outlier, thoroughly despised by their fellow Whites. I, of course, sympathise, being from another group who is a target for their hatred.

    I have a theory for why Jews want to suppress Mein Kampf: because Hitler mentioned how every day is a new day when you’re arguing with a Jew. None of the ass-kicking you gave them yesterday is acknowledged; they just pretend everything starts out at 0 again. This is the mark of a liar, and it’s why Jew-wise people tend to treat Jews like natural-born liars; they get tired of all the lying. Ethnocentrism overrides everything for a great many Jews: morality, honor, dignity, decency, self-respect…

    You’re starting to sound like Revusky now. Calm down.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    "Actually, yes. Jews, along with coastal liberals, are much more in tune with global-white opinion than heartland American Whites, who are an extreme outlier, thoroughly despised by their fellow Whites. I, of course, sympathise, being from another group who is a target for their hatred."

    You can't really believe that, can you? Maybe you are just projecting and fooling yourself. Have you paid any attention to what's going on in Europe? The globalism that is pushed/accepted by the people you mention is hated by many whites across the globe. I wonder if Weimar era Jews were as delusional?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. because then they will no longer be crying wolf. they can point their fingers at the anti semites they help imported.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  66. Gabriel M says:
    @utu
    Voltaire the Anti-Semite:

    “The Kaffirs, the Hottentots, and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and more honest people than your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables, in bad conduct, and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny.”

    “They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.”
     
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Karl says:
    @Svigor
    European populations are Jews' favorite hosts, by far. Keeping them from getting uppity is priority #1 for diaspora Jews. Divide and rule would hardly be a surprise to anyone who has seen how slaveholding elites worked in the past.

    Muslim immigrants, given their proneness to street crime and low academic achievement, are no threat to the elite status of Jews. Nor are they a threat to the current oligarchical power structure of Western societies, an unholy alliance between large donors, politicians, and MSM and academia elites.
     
    And let's face it, Muslims over here have hardly gone out of their way to target Jews, since 9/11. I wouldn't be surprised if some of them felt a sort of quid pro quo was in place: Jews keep the borders open, Muslims kill them last.

    Now when Jews put together the idea that “any social prejudice or exclusion directed against Jews leads potentially to Auschwitz” with the idea that “all bigotry is indivisible,” they must reach the conclusion that any exclusion of any group, no matter how alien it may be to the host society, is a potential Auschwitz.

    So there it is. We have identified the core Jewish conviction that makes Jews keep pushing relentlessly for mass immigration, even the mass immigration of their deadliest enemies. In the thought-process of Jews, to keep Jew-hating Muslims out of America would feed exclusionary attitudes among America’s white Gentile majority that could result in another Jewish Holocaust . Why Jews welcome Muslims The View from the Right, December 9, 2002.
     
    If Israel didn't exist, this would be a lot more plausible. Israel is run by and for Jews. Israel has loads of prejudice and exclusion vs. non-Jews. The Jewish bigotry there is indivisible. Somewhere in there, there has to be a "but it's great when Jews do it." Auster wasn't so good at full disclosure.

    Anti-Israel attitudes are quite common in the Democratic Party— a recent Pew Poll of Democrats found a near-even split, 33% favoring Israel, 31% favoring the Palestinians
     
    That the Democrats are evenly split over what to think of the west's most oppressive state, Apartheid Israel, is an astounding PR coup for Zionists. I wonder how long they can keep it up?

    First, America, the most Protestant Nation of all Protestant Nations, and the only one that takes its religion seriously, in NEVER going to abandon the holy jews. That can be seen at every level of social and political and media reality, especially Fox News. Trump could be a joker, but I doubt it.
     
    Jews don't buy that. They know themselves too well, in their own, twisted way (it's all denial and projection and retconned history and BS, but it's there, if you look).

    "Given that Jewish organizations do not promote anti-Jewish immigration to Israel—or, indeed, any non-Jewish immigration to Israel"

    sad to say, that is not correct.

    Affluent north Tel Aviv is full of leftists who think its fabulous to retain thousands of wetback muslim africans…. in the poor neighborhoods of south Tel Aviv, of course.
     
    Would you name a few powerful Jewish organizations that promote anti-Jewish or even non-Jewish immigration to Israel? Because I can name quite a few that don't (but it would be quicker to just say "organized Jewry"), but are just fine with the current, fascist Israeli immigration policies.

    The vast majority of White people worldwide support multiculturalism and despise Trump.

    So, according to you, white people have an ethnic hatred of white people.
     
    You tried to dodge, but failed. A solid majority of White Americans voted for Trump. 71% of American Jews voted for Hillary.

    Unless your point was that Jews are like a foreign body in America - that makes sense.

    On the other hand, the supposedly liberal Europe you're referring to is far Whiter than America. It's much easier to play with other people's money. Meanwhile, Europe has seen a slow but steady rise of the anti-Open Borders right (far bigger than anything in America), in response to much smaller demographic invasions than America is facing. Maybe it's because we have so many more Jews than they do...

    do ==you== intermarry with people you hate?
     
    1. The very term, "intermarriage" is an indication of Jewish ethnocentrism. It refers to something (people from one White ethnic group marrying people from other White ethnic groups) that nobody else even has a word for. French marries English, whoop-te-doo! But Jews have a word for it, their version of "miscegenation," I suppose. They keep track of this stuff. No one else does.

    2. Guess what? The Jewish "intermarriage" rate is waaaaaay lower than that for the rest of White America. I'd guess no more than half; at least 90% of the rest of White America "intermarries" without a word said about it. They'd look at you funny if you held out your White ethnic group's "intermarriage" rate as proof of high-mindedness.

    3. The way you guys say this shows your ethnocentrism. My, shouldn't we all be so very grateful for the "intermarriage" of the lofty Jews?

    4. Barry Bonds is an anti-White racist, and he married a White woman. I'm sure many a slaveholder banged his slaves, and a few no doubt married them. I bet their attitudes toward their slaves in general had a lot to do with how "uppity" they found them. I find a lot of similarity in how Jews approach Whites. They're all peaches and cream, as long as the Goyim are tame. But when they get uppity, it's time for the whip.

    Name one.

    I have a theory for the behaviour of Jewish Liberal elites: they believe in liberalism.

    I also have a theory for the behaviour of non-Jewish Liberal elites: they believe in liberalism.

    But where’s the fun in that?
     
    I have a theory for why Jews want to suppress Mein Kampf: because Hitler mentioned how every day is a new day when you're arguing with a Jew. None of the ass-kicking you gave them yesterday is acknowledged; they just pretend everything starts out at 0 again. This is the mark of a liar, and it's why Jew-wise people tend to treat Jews like natural-born liars; they get tired of all the lying. Ethnocentrism overrides everything for a great many Jews: morality, honor, dignity, decency, self-respect...

    The problem with your theory is Apartheid Israel, and the phony-leftist Jewish diaspora's die-hard support for her.

    5 Jonathon Revusky> The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad.

    sorry, you don’t get to define Zionism. Zionists do.
     
    Nope. Zionists define "Nazism," "Race-realism," and everything else they please, so I define Zionism. Get your Zionists in line first, and we'll reciprocate. Good luck.

    56 Svigor > Would you name a few powerful Jewish organizations that promote anti-Jewish or even non-Jewish immigration to Israel?

    I can name Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.

    Yes, they’re quite active in North america – after all that’s where the donors LIVE…. but they also are actively in court here, trying to prevent Sudanese from being deported.

    Their donors love Negroes, and HIAS knows which side its bread is buttered on.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    I can name Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.
     
    I was so intrigued by your response that there was, indeed, a major Jewish organization that promoted anti-Jewish or even non-Jewish immigration to Israel, that I decided to visit their website to learn more. Here is what visitors see when they enter the HIAS website http://www.hias.org:

    1,500+ Rabbis Urge U.S. to Keep Doors Open for Refugees

    We, Rabbis from across the United States, call on our newly elected officials to keep America’s doors open to refugees.

    Faced with the largest refugee crisis in all of human history, the United States must continue to be a safe haven for people fleeing religious persecution, genocide, and terror.

    Our Jewish tradition teaches that every individual was created in the image of God. We must not turn our backs to the suffering of those individuals who have fled horrific violence, and who continue to be in extreme peril.

    Furthermore, Jewish history bears witness to the critical choice facing our country: whether to rescue those in need or to construct barriers to keep them out. Jews have seen America at its best, and we know what it looks like for our country to provide the chance at a new beginning. In generations past, our families were given opportunities to gain education, join the workforce, and become part of building our great nation.

    But we also know what it looks like for America to turn its back on refugees. We have seen xenophobia overwhelm our nation’s capacity for compassion, and we have seen the doors slam shut in our greatest hours of need. Severe restrictions kept countless Jewish immigrants in danger, and too many people faced death in Europe after being turned away from these shores.

    We appeal to our elected officials to ensure that the refugee program be maintained and strengthened for refugees of all ethnic and religious backgrounds — not halted, paused, or restricted.

    As Rabbis, we take seriously the biblical mandate to “welcome the stranger.” Grounded in our history and values, we will continue to raise our voices in support of refugees and call on our great nation to uphold a legacy of welcome.
     
    Tell Congress to Keep America's Doors Open For Refugees

    As we mark the beginning of the 115th Congress and the upcoming inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States, please join us in urging the new Congress to prioritize refugee resettlement, protection, and human rights.

    SEND A MESSAGE TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVES

    They even do the heavy lifting by drafting your own personal message:

    I urge you to support and protect refugees and asylum seekers who seek safety, freedom, and dignity. As we mark the beginning of the 115th Congress, we must keep in mind that there are a record 65 million displaced people around the world.

    The United States has a long legacy of providing safe haven and protection to families who flee their homes because of who they are and what they believe. We provide life-saving support for refugees around the world and welcome refugees to our shores where they have the opportunity to restart their lives in safety. Refugees who come to the U.S. enrich our communities with their skills and talents by starting new businesses and revitalizing neighborhoods.

    Critical refugee services are funded by the U.S. State Department, through its Migration and Refugee Assistance account, and the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Refugee Resettlement. Given the growing needs of vulnerable populations including refugees, asylees, and unaccompanied minors, Congress must prioritize funding for these agencies.

    As your constituent, I urge you to welcome and protect refugees, to prioritize funding for agencies like the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement, to hold presidential appointees accountable to addressing the acute and critical needs of refugees and asylum seekers, and to oppose any legislation that seeks to halt or restrict resettlement or funding for any group of refugees.

    It is important to note that resettlement--to the U.S. or anywhere else--is often the last resort for refugees who may never be able to return to their homes or have any access to a productive future in the country to which they first fled. The U.S. Refugee Admissions Program is a critical tool for achieving our humanitarian goals, promoting our economic interests, and enhancing our national security. Unfortunately, this program--and specifically the Office of Refugee Resettlement--has been chronically underfunded for decades while the need for humanitarian protection has increased greatly. We need your support and leadership today more than ever.

    Throughout history, Jews have been refugees, fleeing violence and persecution and seeking safety in new lands. The Jewish community deeply understands what it looks like for nations to offer hope and opportunity--and for nations to slam their doors. Guided by history and the Jewish value of "welcoming the stranger," I am urging you to use your unique leadership role to continue America's proud humanitarian legacy and to continue to welcome families fleeing persecution into communities throughout our great country.
     
    Now, it is true that HIAS indeed has a section on its website related to Israel. After clicking on a couple of links, the following information is provided:

    HIAS in Israel
    Today, now that the Israeli government and the Jewish Agency have assumed full responsibility for immigration and absorption of olim, HIAS is using our expertise to help the country develop a humane admission system for refugees and asylum seekers that adheres to international legal standards and protects the security of the state. According to UNHCR, there are 55,000 refugees in Israel: roughly 36,000 from Eritrea, 15,000 from Sudan, and 4,000 from other African countries.

    Assistance to Individual Refugees in Israel
    HIAS meets with individuals and families (mostly from Eritrea and Sudan) to help them evaluate options for reuniting with family in other countries, including the United States, Canada, Italy, Australia, Switzerland, and Sweden.

    So while refugee resettlement lies at the heart of HIAS’ work in the U.S., it is not a priority for HIAS in Israel. In israel, HIAS is merely willing to meet with the African refugees to help them reunite with their family in western countries, but not to help them resettle in the Zionist state. There are no appeals by rabbis telling the Knesset to keep Israel's doors open for the refugees, urging them to prioritize refugee resettlement, protection, and human rights. No pre drafted personal letter to send to their Member of the Knesset.

    So much for being guided by history and the Jewish value of "welcoming the stranger."

    If you're looking for a clue that explains this difference, HIAS itself reveals it in the following:

    HIAS is using our expertise to help [Israel] develop a humane admission system for refugees and asylum seekers that adheres to international legal standards and protects the security of the state.

    I looked all over, but I couldn't find a similar qualifier for HIAS' work in the US.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Hibernian says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    America the most Protestant nation? Rubbish. The Scandinavian countries and Scotland, probably the whole UK, are more Protestant although they are indeed a lot less enthusiastic about religion than the US.

    Ratio of Protestant to Catholic Presidents: 44 to 1. Scandinavian nations might be called the most Protestant based on %age of the population which is Protestant. Scotland or the entire UK? A lot of Irish Catholic immigrants and their descendants there, including, I think, 3 of the 4 Lads from Liverpool (or maybe 3 1/2, I’m not sure about Harrison.) I’m not sure but I think Sean Connery and Rod Stewart may be relatives of mine.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. geokat62 says:
    @Karl
    56 Svigor > Would you name a few powerful Jewish organizations that promote anti-Jewish or even non-Jewish immigration to Israel?


    I can name Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.

    Yes, they're quite active in North america - after all that's where the donors LIVE.... but they also are actively in court here, trying to prevent Sudanese from being deported.

    Their donors love Negroes, and HIAS knows which side its bread is buttered on.

    I can name Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.

    I was so intrigued by your response that there was, indeed, a major Jewish organization that promoted anti-Jewish or even non-Jewish immigration to Israel, that I decided to visit their website to learn more. Here is what visitors see when they enter the HIAS website http://www.hias.org:

    1,500+ Rabbis Urge U.S. to Keep Doors Open for Refugees

    We, Rabbis from across the United States, call on our newly elected officials to keep America’s doors open to refugees.

    Faced with the largest refugee crisis in all of human history, the United States must continue to be a safe haven for people fleeing religious persecution, genocide, and terror.

    Our Jewish tradition teaches that every individual was created in the image of God. We must not turn our backs to the suffering of those individuals who have fled horrific violence, and who continue to be in extreme peril.

    Furthermore, Jewish history bears witness to the critical choice facing our country: whether to rescue those in need or to construct barriers to keep them out. Jews have seen America at its best, and we know what it looks like for our country to provide the chance at a new beginning. In generations past, our families were given opportunities to gain education, join the workforce, and become part of building our great nation.

    But we also know what it looks like for America to turn its back on refugees. We have seen xenophobia overwhelm our nation’s capacity for compassion, and we have seen the doors slam shut in our greatest hours of need. Severe restrictions kept countless Jewish immigrants in danger, and too many people faced death in Europe after being turned away from these shores.

    We appeal to our elected officials to ensure that the refugee program be maintained and strengthened for refugees of all ethnic and religious backgrounds — not halted, paused, or restricted.

    As Rabbis, we take seriously the biblical mandate to “welcome the stranger.” Grounded in our history and values, we will continue to raise our voices in support of refugees and call on our great nation to uphold a legacy of welcome.

    Tell Congress to Keep America’s Doors Open For Refugees

    As we mark the beginning of the 115th Congress and the upcoming inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States, please join us in urging the new Congress to prioritize refugee resettlement, protection, and human rights.

    SEND A MESSAGE TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVES

    They even do the heavy lifting by drafting your own personal message:

    I urge you to support and protect refugees and asylum seekers who seek safety, freedom, and dignity. As we mark the beginning of the 115th Congress, we must keep in mind that there are a record 65 million displaced people around the world.

    The United States has a long legacy of providing safe haven and protection to families who flee their homes because of who they are and what they believe. We provide life-saving support for refugees around the world and welcome refugees to our shores where they have the opportunity to restart their lives in safety. Refugees who come to the U.S. enrich our communities with their skills and talents by starting new businesses and revitalizing neighborhoods.

    Critical refugee services are funded by the U.S. State Department, through its Migration and Refugee Assistance account, and the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement. Given the growing needs of vulnerable populations including refugees, asylees, and unaccompanied minors, Congress must prioritize funding for these agencies.

    As your constituent, I urge you to welcome and protect refugees, to prioritize funding for agencies like the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement, to hold presidential appointees accountable to addressing the acute and critical needs of refugees and asylum seekers, and to oppose any legislation that seeks to halt or restrict resettlement or funding for any group of refugees.

    It is important to note that resettlement–to the U.S. or anywhere else–is often the last resort for refugees who may never be able to return to their homes or have any access to a productive future in the country to which they first fled. The U.S. Refugee Admissions Program is a critical tool for achieving our humanitarian goals, promoting our economic interests, and enhancing our national security. Unfortunately, this program–and specifically the Office of Refugee Resettlement–has been chronically underfunded for decades while the need for humanitarian protection has increased greatly. We need your support and leadership today more than ever.

    Throughout history, Jews have been refugees, fleeing violence and persecution and seeking safety in new lands. The Jewish community deeply understands what it looks like for nations to offer hope and opportunity–and for nations to slam their doors. Guided by history and the Jewish value of “welcoming the stranger,” I am urging you to use your unique leadership role to continue America’s proud humanitarian legacy and to continue to welcome families fleeing persecution into communities throughout our great country.

    Now, it is true that HIAS indeed has a section on its website related to Israel. After clicking on a couple of links, the following information is provided:

    HIAS in Israel
    Today, now that the Israeli government and the Jewish Agency have assumed full responsibility for immigration and absorption of olim, HIAS is using our expertise to help the country develop a humane admission system for refugees and asylum seekers that adheres to international legal standards and protects the security of the state. According to UNHCR, there are 55,000 refugees in Israel: roughly 36,000 from Eritrea, 15,000 from Sudan, and 4,000 from other African countries.

    Assistance to Individual Refugees in Israel
    HIAS meets with individuals and families (mostly from Eritrea and Sudan) to help them evaluate options for reuniting with family in other countries, including the United States, Canada, Italy, Australia, Switzerland, and Sweden.

    So while refugee resettlement lies at the heart of HIAS’ work in the U.S., it is not a priority for HIAS in Israel. In israel, HIAS is merely willing to meet with the African refugees to help them reunite with their family in western countries, but not to help them resettle in the Zionist state. There are no appeals by rabbis telling the Knesset to keep Israel’s doors open for the refugees, urging them to prioritize refugee resettlement, protection, and human rights. No pre drafted personal letter to send to their Member of the Knesset.

    So much for being guided by history and the Jewish value of “welcoming the stranger.”

    If you’re looking for a clue that explains this difference, HIAS itself reveals it in the following:

    HIAS is using our expertise to help [Israel] develop a humane admission system for refugees and asylum seekers that adheres to international legal standards and protects the security of the state.

    I looked all over, but I couldn’t find a similar qualifier for HIAS’ work in the US.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clearpoint
    Throw a party and invite the world because this is your moral obligation. Any party we decide to throw will be by invitation only, highly exclusive, and will be supported and funded and defended by you because it is your moral obligation to respect our beliefs, no matter how much it costs and no matter how many people we don't like die in the process. Those moral paragons of virtue we call "rabbis" are hilarious.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Tulip says:
    @reiner Tor
    No, for MacDonald it's group ii. which exemplifies "Jewishness" the most.

    But I agree that a finer resolution is possible, and that the Ultra-Orthodox might view things differently. To my knowledge they have voted overwhelmingly for Trump.

    I wouldn't trust them much, though. I know that for example in Hungary the Chabad-Lubavitch support Orbán, but are also supporting the suppression of free speech (especially promoting laws against Holocaust denial and "incitement of hatred"), were active in the doxing of a prominent (pseudonymous) holocaust denier, so to me they look like milder versions of the same SJW Jews. (At least they are against Muslim immigration.)

    I think MacDonald moves between ii.) and iii.) often without noticing.

    Certainly, support for feminism, LGBT rights, sympathy for Palestinian activists (can you say ADL), these are not positions one takes if you want to secure a future for ethnic Jews. Certainly, some Jews view these things (like mass immigration) as good for the goyim, but many Jews (in my experience) actually sincerely embrace this crap for Jews, which belies an unconscious death wish.

    I don’t want to get into the good Jew/bad Jew stuff. I don’t actually care beyond what the group can (or cannot) contribute to the movement. However, there is a certain diversity of frameworks and different possible combinations politically which should be recognized.

    Personally, I think the Jews are screwed, and will get screwed harder than the Anglo-Saxons. Once the West hits peak Muslim (and Europe is already there), Jews will be marginalized then purged from the Left. Once the Jews are purged, then the Left can unify Black, Brown and White in a “class-based” resistance to parasitic “financial capitalism” and “bankers” (e.g. Jews). The Right by that time will be obsessed primarily with the creeping horde of color (and concerned about leaking white working class support to the Socialists), and whatever “home” the Jews will find on the right will be of the strange bedfellow variety.

    However, I give the multikult about 20 years before the Great God of Diversity receives daily blood offerings.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. @geokat62
    Addendum:

    Consistent with this outlook, the ADL has for years promoted the slogan “Diversity is Our Strength.” In keeping with this motto, which it claims to have invented, the ADL has devoted great effort and resources to persuading Americans -- especially younger Americans -- to welcome and embrace ever more social, cultural and racial “diversity.”

    This campaign has been very successful. American politicians and educators, and virtually the entire US mass media, promote “diversity,” “multiculturalism” and “pluralism,” and portray those who do not embrace these objectives as hateful and ignorant. At the same time, influential Jewish-Zionist organizations such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, insist that the US must recognize and defend Israel as a specifically Jewish ethnic-religious state. Pluralism and diversity, it seems, are only for non-Jews. What’s good for Jews in their own homeland, Jewish-Zionist leaders seem to say, is not diversity and multiculturalism, but a tribalistic nationalism.

    http://ihr.org/other/jewishzionistpower2015
     

    Jews can be segregated into two groups, and only two groups. Economic elites and the rabble. Granted the Jewish rabble are several steps up the socio-economic ladder than most rabble. All the rest is just noise.

    The Jewish economic elite use their rabble just like any other economic elite group uses their rabble. They are well paid rabble because much is demanded of them. This is a very expensive thing to do, but the Jewish-created economic system of financial capitalism insures that their high compensation is paid for from other people’s money, and out of other people’s hard work.

    Multiculturalism in Europe and the US? Of course, because the greater the diversity the greater the struggle between much larger enemy cultures against each other. And the Jews are marketed in the wealthy countries they depend on to finance and support their goals as a tolerant and peaceful people.

    Tribalistic nationalism in the promised land, a seemingly huge contradiction? Not at all, unless you insist in looking at these positions through an ideological prism based on off point classifications of the Jewish people. As opposed to Europe and the US, where diversity creates conflict, in Israel it is tribalistic nationalism which creates the conflict, which is needed to further the cultural mythology of the Jews as the persecuted chosen ones, and to gain the sympathy and support of enemy cultures in Europe and the US that they parasiticly feed off of.

    These economic elites are psychopaths, and they rule their culture with an iron fist. Their culture is closed and exclusive for to permit it to be open and inclusive would result in the destruction of their own power. Their rabble are highly educated, but also highly indoctrinated, constantly in pursuit of wealth and power through intellectually demanding and satisfying careers, and culturally and ideologically distinct from the rest of the world. The result is an environment in which their rabble are content to live their lives in blissful ignorance, turn a blind eye to the violence and cruelty of the policies of their leaders, and place their faith in the angry, vengeful God of the Old Testament who punishes all sinners who stand in the way. To question any of this is forbidden; in biblical terms it is to take a bite of the apple from the tree of knowledge, and thereby surrender your place in the Garden of Eden.

    Never underestimate man’s willingness to escape the freedom of a hard reality for the safety and security of a compelling fantasy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art
    Here is the mountain that humanity has to conquer.

    Rothschild family wealth is five times that of the top eight billionaires combined.

    >>> >>> >>> >>>

    Fast forward to 2016, the Rothschild family is a dynasty of unimaginable wealth which manages to somehow conceal it for the most part, never quite being publicly credited as the richest and most influential family in the world. By dividing their capital and holdings up amongst the many members of the family, including numerous descendants and heirs, occasionally a single member of the family will appear on a list of the world’s top individuals, however, the family as a whole represents the largest fortune ever known.

    “Traditionally, the Rothschild fortune is invested in closely held corporations. Most family members are employed by these corporations directly or invested in operations that generate family wealth. The remarkable success of the family has largely been due to a strong interest in cooperation, being entrepreneurs and the practice of shrewd business principles.”

    Investopedia estimates the family’s total wealth at over $2 trillion in assets and holdings, including some of the world’s oldest living corporations:

    http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/01/20/rothschild-family-wealth-five-times-worlds-top-8-billionaires-combined/

     

    This giant wealth controls the Western nations and their central banks – end of story.

    Nothing CAN change until this is addressed. True democracy cannot exist in the face of this enormous Jew wealth.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. joe webb says:

    one definition of an anti-semite is someone who hates the jews more than is necessary.

    At the personal level, starting out as a philo-semite since my family was, yes indeed, communist compleat with several jewish friends who always treated me well…although one of my strongest memories about them was when in college and working in summertime, I went to work for one of these nice jews painting a fence at one of their rental units, as I recall, and returning at quitting time to aforesaid nice jewish couple’s home to meet my wife, etc….nice jewish gal offered me a snack.

    I said sure. Would you like some nuts? Sure. I watched as she went to the cupboard, and got out a can of nuts. She began shaking the can to spill out some nuts into a bowl. She shook a few out, stopped, did it again, stopped, did it again…and I got a little bowl half full, or half empty, depending on whether your are jewish or white.

    Poor dear, as my mother remarked later, she was a Russian Jew and “grew up in poverty,” although now she was more or less rich…merchants in town.

    Over the years my philo-semitism eroded as the experiences with my jewish friends yielded lots of unpleasantness….chief of which was, ahem, that they did not really love me, but were acutely competitive and envious. So way before I got straightened out politically, my personal experience resulted in getting rid of all jews in my personal life. I might add that these were men, and that my several Jewish girlfriends in my 30s and 40s was not bad….they loved having a Viking, as they often remarked, but given my general inability to sustain a relationship, picky, picky, picky…they too were dismissed.

    (Now that I am informed by biology and realism, I have gotten far more accepting of folks just the way they are…biology.)

    So, one might argue, that my experience was subjective, etc. Guess what, the vast majority of mankind see things the same way…Jews are nasty, in general, and, and, and…

    Objectively, as we used to say on the Left, Jews wrote almost all the race equality books, starting with Boas, and on and on. My favorite is the Mismeasurement of Man, by the ghoul…Stephen Gould, whom Jehovah mercifully snatched from life to spare him the unpleasant experience to have been adjudged a LIAR by peers…with regard to Morton’s skull measurements of blacks and whites.

    So, Svigor argues that Jews are just liberals, like about half of white americans. Case closed as jews like to say. The Jew has Spoken! Fact: White liberals are so because of their abundant Altruism, the racial curse of Whites. Jews are liberals for exactly the reverse…their hatred of Whites, and actually everybody else, especially their beloved schwartzes, whom they champion to ruin White Power wherever they happen to be, Europe or the US or Russia, etc.

    Clever little Darwinian devils….And whites should become a little more devilish ourselves…modeling the Jews to remove their Lies and themselves from the Body Politic. Jews are parasites, who will kill their host, but what they hey, they got The Bomb, and can retreat to the Blood and Soil homeland.

    O , forgot to add that Jews are fascists, not there is anything wrong with that, except that like the Jews, HItler took it too far…going after Slavs, etc, etc. Do I hate the Jews more than is necessary?

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  73. @Gabriel M

    You tried to dodge, but failed. A solid majority of White Americans voted for Trump. 71% of American Jews voted for Hillary.

    Unless your point was that Jews are like a foreign body in America – that makes sense.
     
    Actually, yes. Jews, along with coastal liberals, are much more in tune with global-white opinion than heartland American Whites, who are an extreme outlier, thoroughly despised by their fellow Whites. I, of course, sympathise, being from another group who is a target for their hatred.

    I have a theory for why Jews want to suppress Mein Kampf: because Hitler mentioned how every day is a new day when you’re arguing with a Jew. None of the ass-kicking you gave them yesterday is acknowledged; they just pretend everything starts out at 0 again. This is the mark of a liar, and it’s why Jew-wise people tend to treat Jews like natural-born liars; they get tired of all the lying. Ethnocentrism overrides everything for a great many Jews: morality, honor, dignity, decency, self-respect…
     
    You're starting to sound like Revusky now. Calm down.

    “Actually, yes. Jews, along with coastal liberals, are much more in tune with global-white opinion than heartland American Whites, who are an extreme outlier, thoroughly despised by their fellow Whites. I, of course, sympathise, being from another group who is a target for their hatred.”

    You can’t really believe that, can you? Maybe you are just projecting and fooling yourself. Have you paid any attention to what’s going on in Europe? The globalism that is pushed/accepted by the people you mention is hated by many whites across the globe. I wonder if Weimar era Jews were as delusional?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gabriel M

    The globalism that is pushed/accepted by the people you mention is hated by many whites across the globe. I wonder if Weimar era Jews were as delusional?
     
    It is hated by a small minority of Whites, strongly concentrated among the old and uneducated. No nationalist party in Western Europe is going to get anywhere close to power except maybe in Austria. Paris has been transformed into a warzone and Marine Le Pen - who is well to the Left of Trump - can't crack 30% of the vote, let alone the 30% she will actually need. UKIP, who are not even right-wing, have 1 MP despite the fact of mass sexual-slavery of indigenous girls by Pakistanis

    Again, I'm on the side of the old and uneducated. I understand perfectly well how the majority of Whites are manipulated by the universities, schools and media into supporting policies that are disastrous for themselves. I'm just stating facts.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Jeff77450 says:

    “The Jewish leaders’ own rationales—which we should take seriously—generally derive from how they view the past. And it’s the fact that Jews were sometimes denied the ability to flee Hitler’s Germany.” I’m a layman but this sounds like false equivalency to me. From 1933 to 1945 Jews in Europe were very limited in where they could go and actually be safe. But the Organization of Islamic Cooperation has 57 member states, most of which aren’t at war. The so-called tragic refugees, most of which are likely coming for economic reasons, don’t need to go to non-Islamic nations.

    The following analogy may not be exact but everyone who wants to welcome the refugees/migrants with open arms reminds me of that famous observation made by Sir Winston Churchill, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @joe webb
    "denied to flee Hitler's Germany" false. Lennie Brenner wrote two books about the Agreement between Hitler and the jews, revisionists I think like Jabotinsky. A coin was struck to commemorate the event with a mogen david on one side and a swastika on the other. How extensive this was I don't know, but I have the books.\\

    Obviously it was a good deal for both. It is possible for two fascisms to get along, but not in the same territory, assuming that it is Blood and Soil for both.

    Joe Webb.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Talha says:
    @Karl
    5 Jonathon Revusky> The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad.

    sorry, you don't get to define Zionism. Zionists do.

    Zion must exist because we were commanded to live there. It is against OUR OWN rules to (permanently) live anyplace else.

    Very few people are more comfortably situated than American Jews, yet we throw money at the problem of trying to talk them into leaving America and moving here. I'm not even sure that having them here would really help, but if are going to bring in the Ethiopians (I had mixed feelings about that, but that's a done deal), we should bring in the American Jews.

    I might have a secret plan to move the best of the GoodWhites to Freeholds in Samaria, in which case, I get define who a White person is. But anyplace else in the world, white people deine who they are. If they want to exclude some rather Aryan-looking Jews (there are plenty) - so be it. Self-determination is a thing.

    What's going here under the surface is that whites can't pull off a nationalist movement. They're GREAT at talking about it..... but let there be a REAL white-ethnic country (eg, Sweden, Germany, Netherlands).... and they will Somali-ize it all by themselves.

    When the wife of a beta fat slob fucks the pool boy, there's two people at fault, and none of them are the pool boy.


    I don't know if Rakhine people are good or bad, but I know that they do more than talk about building an ethno-state. Rakhines aren't white, maybe that's why they can spit in the face of the entire worldwide Muslim Ummah and not feel guilty about it.

    If we dispassionately look at it - the way an actuary or a commodities-speculator would look at it - guys like Jonathan Revusky cannot build nations that last.

    Fix THAT problem, John.

    Hey Karl,

    Zion must exist because we were commanded to live there. It is against OUR OWN rules to (permanently) live anyplace else.

    Question here – the siege and capture of Jerusalem and practically the lion’s share of what is now Israel was completed by Sultan Saladin around 1187:

    http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/this-day-in-jewish-history/this-day-in-jewish-history-saladin-captures-jerusalem-from-the-crusaders-1.467797

    Rabbi Maimonides was alive for another 15 years or so after that – yet spent his life and died in Cairo/Fustat, Egypt.

    Did he completely miss out on that rule? His rulings were sought from the Jews of Yemen, North Africa, Levant, etc. Is there any proof he told Jewish people that they should go and live in that area now that the Crusaders had been kicked out and it was open for settlement because of the prohibition to live permanently elsewhere?

    Rakhines aren’t white, maybe that’s why they can spit in the face of the entire worldwide Muslim Ummah and not feel guilty about it.

    Yeah – it’s really a shame a lot of the Chechens are caught up in extremism right now and on some stupid pipe-dream mission with Daesh. The Caucasians (Whites without guilt) have traditionally provided us with great shock troops to deal with this sort of thing.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gabriel M

    Did he completely miss out on that rule? His rulings were sought from the Jews of Yemen, North Africa, Levant, etc. Is there any proof he told Jewish people that they should go and live in that area now that the Crusaders had been kicked out and it was open for settlement because of the prohibition to live permanently elsewhere?
     
    He went to live there and left because he couldn't make a living. The community there was on the brink of starvation after the ravages of 100s of years of war. As Maimonides writes himself, it is permitted to leave the land of Israel in order to earn a living (as well to find a wife or to study Torah).

    If you want to read what Maimonides wrote on the commandment to live in Israel go here:

    http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1188349/jewish/Melachim-uMilchamot-Chapter-5.htm

    Start at law 9.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Svigor

    Dear Anatoly,
    You must think of yourself as a genius. Is it not said somewhere that such mentality is the surest sign of a moron?
     
    Dear nobody,
    You must be a wife-beater. Is it not said that wife-beating is the surest sign of a small dick?

    Overestimated your genius. Wrong on both counts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. As always, the question we must ask of this or anything is, “Yes, but is it good for the Jews?”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  78. @geokat62

    I can name Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.
     
    I was so intrigued by your response that there was, indeed, a major Jewish organization that promoted anti-Jewish or even non-Jewish immigration to Israel, that I decided to visit their website to learn more. Here is what visitors see when they enter the HIAS website http://www.hias.org:

    1,500+ Rabbis Urge U.S. to Keep Doors Open for Refugees

    We, Rabbis from across the United States, call on our newly elected officials to keep America’s doors open to refugees.

    Faced with the largest refugee crisis in all of human history, the United States must continue to be a safe haven for people fleeing religious persecution, genocide, and terror.

    Our Jewish tradition teaches that every individual was created in the image of God. We must not turn our backs to the suffering of those individuals who have fled horrific violence, and who continue to be in extreme peril.

    Furthermore, Jewish history bears witness to the critical choice facing our country: whether to rescue those in need or to construct barriers to keep them out. Jews have seen America at its best, and we know what it looks like for our country to provide the chance at a new beginning. In generations past, our families were given opportunities to gain education, join the workforce, and become part of building our great nation.

    But we also know what it looks like for America to turn its back on refugees. We have seen xenophobia overwhelm our nation’s capacity for compassion, and we have seen the doors slam shut in our greatest hours of need. Severe restrictions kept countless Jewish immigrants in danger, and too many people faced death in Europe after being turned away from these shores.

    We appeal to our elected officials to ensure that the refugee program be maintained and strengthened for refugees of all ethnic and religious backgrounds — not halted, paused, or restricted.

    As Rabbis, we take seriously the biblical mandate to “welcome the stranger.” Grounded in our history and values, we will continue to raise our voices in support of refugees and call on our great nation to uphold a legacy of welcome.
     
    Tell Congress to Keep America's Doors Open For Refugees

    As we mark the beginning of the 115th Congress and the upcoming inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States, please join us in urging the new Congress to prioritize refugee resettlement, protection, and human rights.

    SEND A MESSAGE TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVES

    They even do the heavy lifting by drafting your own personal message:

    I urge you to support and protect refugees and asylum seekers who seek safety, freedom, and dignity. As we mark the beginning of the 115th Congress, we must keep in mind that there are a record 65 million displaced people around the world.

    The United States has a long legacy of providing safe haven and protection to families who flee their homes because of who they are and what they believe. We provide life-saving support for refugees around the world and welcome refugees to our shores where they have the opportunity to restart their lives in safety. Refugees who come to the U.S. enrich our communities with their skills and talents by starting new businesses and revitalizing neighborhoods.

    Critical refugee services are funded by the U.S. State Department, through its Migration and Refugee Assistance account, and the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Refugee Resettlement. Given the growing needs of vulnerable populations including refugees, asylees, and unaccompanied minors, Congress must prioritize funding for these agencies.

    As your constituent, I urge you to welcome and protect refugees, to prioritize funding for agencies like the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement, to hold presidential appointees accountable to addressing the acute and critical needs of refugees and asylum seekers, and to oppose any legislation that seeks to halt or restrict resettlement or funding for any group of refugees.

    It is important to note that resettlement--to the U.S. or anywhere else--is often the last resort for refugees who may never be able to return to their homes or have any access to a productive future in the country to which they first fled. The U.S. Refugee Admissions Program is a critical tool for achieving our humanitarian goals, promoting our economic interests, and enhancing our national security. Unfortunately, this program--and specifically the Office of Refugee Resettlement--has been chronically underfunded for decades while the need for humanitarian protection has increased greatly. We need your support and leadership today more than ever.

    Throughout history, Jews have been refugees, fleeing violence and persecution and seeking safety in new lands. The Jewish community deeply understands what it looks like for nations to offer hope and opportunity--and for nations to slam their doors. Guided by history and the Jewish value of "welcoming the stranger," I am urging you to use your unique leadership role to continue America's proud humanitarian legacy and to continue to welcome families fleeing persecution into communities throughout our great country.
     
    Now, it is true that HIAS indeed has a section on its website related to Israel. After clicking on a couple of links, the following information is provided:

    HIAS in Israel
    Today, now that the Israeli government and the Jewish Agency have assumed full responsibility for immigration and absorption of olim, HIAS is using our expertise to help the country develop a humane admission system for refugees and asylum seekers that adheres to international legal standards and protects the security of the state. According to UNHCR, there are 55,000 refugees in Israel: roughly 36,000 from Eritrea, 15,000 from Sudan, and 4,000 from other African countries.

    Assistance to Individual Refugees in Israel
    HIAS meets with individuals and families (mostly from Eritrea and Sudan) to help them evaluate options for reuniting with family in other countries, including the United States, Canada, Italy, Australia, Switzerland, and Sweden.

    So while refugee resettlement lies at the heart of HIAS’ work in the U.S., it is not a priority for HIAS in Israel. In israel, HIAS is merely willing to meet with the African refugees to help them reunite with their family in western countries, but not to help them resettle in the Zionist state. There are no appeals by rabbis telling the Knesset to keep Israel's doors open for the refugees, urging them to prioritize refugee resettlement, protection, and human rights. No pre drafted personal letter to send to their Member of the Knesset.

    So much for being guided by history and the Jewish value of "welcoming the stranger."

    If you're looking for a clue that explains this difference, HIAS itself reveals it in the following:

    HIAS is using our expertise to help [Israel] develop a humane admission system for refugees and asylum seekers that adheres to international legal standards and protects the security of the state.

    I looked all over, but I couldn't find a similar qualifier for HIAS' work in the US.

    Throw a party and invite the world because this is your moral obligation. Any party we decide to throw will be by invitation only, highly exclusive, and will be supported and funded and defended by you because it is your moral obligation to respect our beliefs, no matter how much it costs and no matter how many people we don’t like die in the process. Those moral paragons of virtue we call “rabbis” are hilarious.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. @Karl
    5 Jonathon Revusky> The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad.

    sorry, you don't get to define Zionism. Zionists do.

    Zion must exist because we were commanded to live there. It is against OUR OWN rules to (permanently) live anyplace else.

    Very few people are more comfortably situated than American Jews, yet we throw money at the problem of trying to talk them into leaving America and moving here. I'm not even sure that having them here would really help, but if are going to bring in the Ethiopians (I had mixed feelings about that, but that's a done deal), we should bring in the American Jews.

    I might have a secret plan to move the best of the GoodWhites to Freeholds in Samaria, in which case, I get define who a White person is. But anyplace else in the world, white people deine who they are. If they want to exclude some rather Aryan-looking Jews (there are plenty) - so be it. Self-determination is a thing.

    What's going here under the surface is that whites can't pull off a nationalist movement. They're GREAT at talking about it..... but let there be a REAL white-ethnic country (eg, Sweden, Germany, Netherlands).... and they will Somali-ize it all by themselves.

    When the wife of a beta fat slob fucks the pool boy, there's two people at fault, and none of them are the pool boy.


    I don't know if Rakhine people are good or bad, but I know that they do more than talk about building an ethno-state. Rakhines aren't white, maybe that's why they can spit in the face of the entire worldwide Muslim Ummah and not feel guilty about it.

    If we dispassionately look at it - the way an actuary or a commodities-speculator would look at it - guys like Jonathan Revusky cannot build nations that last.

    Fix THAT problem, John.

    And the toilet must exist because you are commanded to shit. Feel free to call that little bit of Zion your anti-shitmantic safety valve, for use in those times when the proverbial shit hits the fan. I promise not to get territorial over the definition.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. Art says:
    @Clearpoint
    Jews can be segregated into two groups, and only two groups. Economic elites and the rabble. Granted the Jewish rabble are several steps up the socio-economic ladder than most rabble. All the rest is just noise.

    The Jewish economic elite use their rabble just like any other economic elite group uses their rabble. They are well paid rabble because much is demanded of them. This is a very expensive thing to do, but the Jewish-created economic system of financial capitalism insures that their high compensation is paid for from other people's money, and out of other people's hard work.

    Multiculturalism in Europe and the US? Of course, because the greater the diversity the greater the struggle between much larger enemy cultures against each other. And the Jews are marketed in the wealthy countries they depend on to finance and support their goals as a tolerant and peaceful people.

    Tribalistic nationalism in the promised land, a seemingly huge contradiction? Not at all, unless you insist in looking at these positions through an ideological prism based on off point classifications of the Jewish people. As opposed to Europe and the US, where diversity creates conflict, in Israel it is tribalistic nationalism which creates the conflict, which is needed to further the cultural mythology of the Jews as the persecuted chosen ones, and to gain the sympathy and support of enemy cultures in Europe and the US that they parasiticly feed off of.

    These economic elites are psychopaths, and they rule their culture with an iron fist. Their culture is closed and exclusive for to permit it to be open and inclusive would result in the destruction of their own power. Their rabble are highly educated, but also highly indoctrinated, constantly in pursuit of wealth and power through intellectually demanding and satisfying careers, and culturally and ideologically distinct from the rest of the world. The result is an environment in which their rabble are content to live their lives in blissful ignorance, turn a blind eye to the violence and cruelty of the policies of their leaders, and place their faith in the angry, vengeful God of the Old Testament who punishes all sinners who stand in the way. To question any of this is forbidden; in biblical terms it is to take a bite of the apple from the tree of knowledge, and thereby surrender your place in the Garden of Eden.

    Never underestimate man's willingness to escape the freedom of a hard reality for the safety and security of a compelling fantasy.

    Here is the mountain that humanity has to conquer.

    Rothschild family wealth is five times that of the top eight billionaires combined.

    >>> >>> >>> >>>

    Fast forward to 2016, the Rothschild family is a dynasty of unimaginable wealth which manages to somehow conceal it for the most part, never quite being publicly credited as the richest and most influential family in the world. By dividing their capital and holdings up amongst the many members of the family, including numerous descendants and heirs, occasionally a single member of the family will appear on a list of the world’s top individuals, however, the family as a whole represents the largest fortune ever known.

    “Traditionally, the Rothschild fortune is invested in closely held corporations. Most family members are employed by these corporations directly or invested in operations that generate family wealth. The remarkable success of the family has largely been due to a strong interest in cooperation, being entrepreneurs and the practice of shrewd business principles.”

    Investopedia estimates the family’s total wealth at over $2 trillion in assets and holdings, including some of the world’s oldest living corporations:

    http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/01/20/rothschild-family-wealth-five-times-worlds-top-8-billionaires-combined/

    This giant wealth controls the Western nations and their central banks – end of story.

    Nothing CAN change until this is addressed. True democracy cannot exist in the face of this enormous Jew wealth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clearpoint
    And exactly what did they do that merits the accumulation of all that wealth? The Rothschild parasites figured out a way to insert themselves in between nearly every human economic transaction and extract a toll out of it. So, yes, I agree. Economic productivity is not the problem. If it were, the Rothschilds' would never have been able to accumulate such wealth. As a matter of fact, economic productivity of the recent past has been so great as to mask the real problem---that being the equitable distribution of responsibility for, and benefits of, that economic productivity.

    There are a lot of toll booths that feed off of the productive economy. The Jewish created system of privately held banks, money creation, and financial capitalism, of which the Rothschild empire is the flagship for, is by far the worst of them. Eventually this system must be destroyed for humanity to advance forward.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. Max Payne says:

    Of course Jewish organizations will advocate for the West to take in refugees. How else can they clear out Arabs from their land to create greater Israel? Once they leave there is no right to return (for them anyway).

    All the other types of refugees are just a by-product of this plan.

    Fear of the past? Pshh….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  82. joe webb says:
    @Jeff77450
    "The Jewish leaders’ own rationales—which we should take seriously—generally derive from how they view the past. And it’s the fact that Jews were sometimes denied the ability to flee Hitler’s Germany." I'm a layman but this sounds like false equivalency to me. From 1933 to 1945 Jews in Europe were very limited in where they could go and actually be safe. But the Organization of Islamic Cooperation has 57 member states, most of which aren't at war. The so-called tragic refugees, most of which are likely coming for economic reasons, don't need to go to non-Islamic nations.

    The following analogy may not be exact but everyone who wants to welcome the refugees/migrants with open arms reminds me of that famous observation made by Sir Winston Churchill, "An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."

    “denied to flee Hitler’s Germany” false. Lennie Brenner wrote two books about the Agreement between Hitler and the jews, revisionists I think like Jabotinsky. A coin was struck to commemorate the event with a mogen david on one side and a swastika on the other. How extensive this was I don’t know, but I have the books.\\

    Obviously it was a good deal for both. It is possible for two fascisms to get along, but not in the same territory, assuming that it is Blood and Soil for both.

    Joe Webb.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. Svigor says:

    Actually, yes. Jews, along with coastal liberals, are much more in tune with global-white opinion than heartland American Whites, who are an extreme outlier, thoroughly despised by their fellow Whites broke strongly for Trump. I, of course, sympathise, being from another group who is a target for their hatred.

    FIFY

    You’re starting to sound like Revusky now. Calm down.

    Oh, we weren’t just throwing out stupid, ignoramus theories? Cuz I thought that’s what we were doing.

    Note the rest of my comment, which Gabe ignored.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gabriel M
    I think my "ignoramus theory" is that the majority American Jews believe in liberalism, in line with the great majority of Whites worldwide. Apparently, being confronted with the simple fact that the majority of Whites around the world despise you causes you to get angry and start rambling. I sympathise, but one has to learn to deal with these things.

    You counter-argument is that most American Jews are pro-Israel so their liberalism can't be sincere.

    1) All liberals are somewhat hypocritical about things that affect them personally.
    2) As a general rule, the more liberal a given Jew's beliefs are about Israel the more liberal his beliefs about things in general.
    3) American Jews do not have significantly different views about Israel to Americans in general.
    4) Israel is really not anywhere near as right-wing as you imagine it to be and so the degree of hypocrisy is not as significant as you imagine.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbYopiz6sLg


    So your theory amounts to "the average Jew has opinions about Israel that are slightly more right wing than his opinions in general", i.e. a nothingburger.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. Nandish says:

    Read Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman “To Eliminate the Opiate” and Gershom Scholem “The Messianic Idea in Judaism” for deep analyses of this cultural and political phenomenon, as well as jaw-dropping suppressed Jewish history.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  85. I imagine they plan on killing them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  86. Gabriel M says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    "Actually, yes. Jews, along with coastal liberals, are much more in tune with global-white opinion than heartland American Whites, who are an extreme outlier, thoroughly despised by their fellow Whites. I, of course, sympathise, being from another group who is a target for their hatred."

    You can't really believe that, can you? Maybe you are just projecting and fooling yourself. Have you paid any attention to what's going on in Europe? The globalism that is pushed/accepted by the people you mention is hated by many whites across the globe. I wonder if Weimar era Jews were as delusional?

    The globalism that is pushed/accepted by the people you mention is hated by many whites across the globe. I wonder if Weimar era Jews were as delusional?

    It is hated by a small minority of Whites, strongly concentrated among the old and uneducated. No nationalist party in Western Europe is going to get anywhere close to power except maybe in Austria. Paris has been transformed into a warzone and Marine Le Pen – who is well to the Left of Trump – can’t crack 30% of the vote, let alone the 30% she will actually need. UKIP, who are not even right-wing, have 1 MP despite the fact of mass sexual-slavery of indigenous girls by Pakistanis

    Again, I’m on the side of the old and uneducated. I understand perfectly well how the majority of Whites are manipulated by the universities, schools and media into supporting policies that are disastrous for themselves. I’m just stating facts.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    At no point during the whole campaign did I seriously believe Britain would leave.

    Either way, though, he probably won’t win so you might as well make the best of it.

    No nationalist party in Western Europe is going to get anywhere close to power except maybe in Austria.

    Should we expect you to achieve 0 for 3 or 1 for 3?

    , @OilcanFloyd
    "It is hated by a small minority of Whites, strongly concentrated among the old and uneducated."

    Globalism and multiculturalism are only hated by a small amount of whites worldwide, and mostly among the elderly and uneducated? That's really your claim?

    First of all, when speaking of whites worldwide, you dismiss whites in Russia and much of central and eastern Europe, who tend to be against globalism and multiculturalism. I assume the same would be the case with many whites in the commonwealth nations outside of Canada.

    Populism and nationalism are definitely gaining steam in Europe. In Sweden, the Sweden Democrats and other right of center parties garner a higher percentage of votes, when combined, than the ruling party. Merkel is definitely unpopular, as are her counterparts throughout Europe. If you are going to move the goalposts and say that only neo-nazis can be counted as whites who oppose globalism and multiculturalism, then that's a different argument than you or anyone else has made or responded to.

    The Globalist/Multicult order in Europe and North America is definitely being challenged by the natives, and the natives are mostly white. The game is just beginning, and I expect more whites to enter the opposition, as it becomes more obvious that the intent to destroy their nations, cultures, livelihoods, and possible their physical beings, becomes more obvious.

    As for France, the Global Left is definitely being challenged. The fact that LePen may not crack 30% means little, since her opponents aren't doing much/any better, and some of those opponents are on the right. If Fillon, who is projected to beat her, and is also talking about cracking down on immigration, gets more votes, then the voters who are opponents of the Globalist System aren't a tiny minority of the elderly and uneducated. What remains to be seen is how sincere the politicians really are.

    I'm not even sure what you consider uneducated, since most people, white or otherwise, don't go to college. The "uneducated" and elderly make up a very large percentage of whites around the world, and their voices should be heard. Either way, it's not those people who are mismanaging the world for their own benefit. Only time will tell if the opposition will become organized enough to topple the Global Leftists, but it's possible that it will happen, and there is definitely a large group of whites in opposition. Conflict is likely when one group openly declares war on another.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Gabriel M says:
    @Talha
    Hey Karl,

    Zion must exist because we were commanded to live there. It is against OUR OWN rules to (permanently) live anyplace else.
     
    Question here - the siege and capture of Jerusalem and practically the lion's share of what is now Israel was completed by Sultan Saladin around 1187:
    http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/this-day-in-jewish-history/this-day-in-jewish-history-saladin-captures-jerusalem-from-the-crusaders-1.467797

    Rabbi Maimonides was alive for another 15 years or so after that - yet spent his life and died in Cairo/Fustat, Egypt.

    Did he completely miss out on that rule? His rulings were sought from the Jews of Yemen, North Africa, Levant, etc. Is there any proof he told Jewish people that they should go and live in that area now that the Crusaders had been kicked out and it was open for settlement because of the prohibition to live permanently elsewhere?


    Rakhines aren’t white, maybe that’s why they can spit in the face of the entire worldwide Muslim Ummah and not feel guilty about it.
     
    Yeah - it's really a shame a lot of the Chechens are caught up in extremism right now and on some stupid pipe-dream mission with Daesh. The Caucasians (Whites without guilt) have traditionally provided us with great shock troops to deal with this sort of thing.

    Peace.

    Did he completely miss out on that rule? His rulings were sought from the Jews of Yemen, North Africa, Levant, etc. Is there any proof he told Jewish people that they should go and live in that area now that the Crusaders had been kicked out and it was open for settlement because of the prohibition to live permanently elsewhere?

    He went to live there and left because he couldn’t make a living. The community there was on the brink of starvation after the ravages of 100s of years of war. As Maimonides writes himself, it is permitted to leave the land of Israel in order to earn a living (as well to find a wife or to study Torah).

    If you want to read what Maimonides wrote on the commandment to live in Israel go here:

    http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1188349/jewish/Melachim-uMilchamot-Chapter-5.htm

    Start at law 9.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Gabriel,

    Very, very interesting stuff - thanks much for the link. It seems like, at least from a practical perspective, this has been basically disregarded for much of history - or at least the practical exemption for leaving to earn a living, makes it mostly a non-issue.

    Also interesting that it declares Egypt a no-go area, but that the Rabbi himself lived, taught and died in it due to practicing on the exemptions from the general rule.

    Peace.

    Note: The flow of the language and style of the text (not content) is very familiar to anyone who has read texts of Muslim jurists - that's pretty cool. :)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Gabriel M says:
    @Svigor

    Actually, yes. Jews, along with coastal liberals, are much more in tune with global-white opinion than heartland American Whites, who are an extreme outlier, thoroughly despised by their fellow Whites broke strongly for Trump. I, of course, sympathise, being from another group who is a target for their hatred.
     
    FIFY

    You’re starting to sound like Revusky now. Calm down.
     
    Oh, we weren't just throwing out stupid, ignoramus theories? Cuz I thought that's what we were doing.

    Note the rest of my comment, which Gabe ignored.

    I think my “ignoramus theory” is that the majority American Jews believe in liberalism, in line with the great majority of Whites worldwide. Apparently, being confronted with the simple fact that the majority of Whites around the world despise you causes you to get angry and start rambling. I sympathise, but one has to learn to deal with these things.

    You counter-argument is that most American Jews are pro-Israel so their liberalism can’t be sincere.

    1) All liberals are somewhat hypocritical about things that affect them personally.
    2) As a general rule, the more liberal a given Jew’s beliefs are about Israel the more liberal his beliefs about things in general.
    3) American Jews do not have significantly different views about Israel to Americans in general.
    4) Israel is really not anywhere near as right-wing as you imagine it to be and so the degree of hypocrisy is not as significant as you imagine.

    So your theory amounts to “the average Jew has opinions about Israel that are slightly more right wing than his opinions in general”, i.e. a nothingburger.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. @Art
    Here is the mountain that humanity has to conquer.

    Rothschild family wealth is five times that of the top eight billionaires combined.

    >>> >>> >>> >>>

    Fast forward to 2016, the Rothschild family is a dynasty of unimaginable wealth which manages to somehow conceal it for the most part, never quite being publicly credited as the richest and most influential family in the world. By dividing their capital and holdings up amongst the many members of the family, including numerous descendants and heirs, occasionally a single member of the family will appear on a list of the world’s top individuals, however, the family as a whole represents the largest fortune ever known.

    “Traditionally, the Rothschild fortune is invested in closely held corporations. Most family members are employed by these corporations directly or invested in operations that generate family wealth. The remarkable success of the family has largely been due to a strong interest in cooperation, being entrepreneurs and the practice of shrewd business principles.”

    Investopedia estimates the family’s total wealth at over $2 trillion in assets and holdings, including some of the world’s oldest living corporations:

    http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/01/20/rothschild-family-wealth-five-times-worlds-top-8-billionaires-combined/

     

    This giant wealth controls the Western nations and their central banks – end of story.

    Nothing CAN change until this is addressed. True democracy cannot exist in the face of this enormous Jew wealth.

    And exactly what did they do that merits the accumulation of all that wealth? The Rothschild parasites figured out a way to insert themselves in between nearly every human economic transaction and extract a toll out of it. So, yes, I agree. Economic productivity is not the problem. If it were, the Rothschilds’ would never have been able to accumulate such wealth. As a matter of fact, economic productivity of the recent past has been so great as to mask the real problem—that being the equitable distribution of responsibility for, and benefits of, that economic productivity.

    There are a lot of toll booths that feed off of the productive economy. The Jewish created system of privately held banks, money creation, and financial capitalism, of which the Rothschild empire is the flagship for, is by far the worst of them. Eventually this system must be destroyed for humanity to advance forward.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art

    There are a lot of toll booths that feed off of the productive economy. The Jewish created system of privately held banks, money creation, and financial capitalism, of which the Rothschild empire is the flagship for, is by far the worst of them. Eventually this system must be destroyed for humanity to advance forward.
     
    The Rothschild family cabal has so much power that ALL the worlds mainstream journalists refuse to write about their wealth. They NEVER make any list of the world's most wealthy. Not even the left who hate capitalists, will write about them. Only raw naked fear can accomplish that.

    The Rothschilds are the pride of Judaism.

    Peace --- Art
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. iffen says:
    @Gabriel M

    The globalism that is pushed/accepted by the people you mention is hated by many whites across the globe. I wonder if Weimar era Jews were as delusional?
     
    It is hated by a small minority of Whites, strongly concentrated among the old and uneducated. No nationalist party in Western Europe is going to get anywhere close to power except maybe in Austria. Paris has been transformed into a warzone and Marine Le Pen - who is well to the Left of Trump - can't crack 30% of the vote, let alone the 30% she will actually need. UKIP, who are not even right-wing, have 1 MP despite the fact of mass sexual-slavery of indigenous girls by Pakistanis

    Again, I'm on the side of the old and uneducated. I understand perfectly well how the majority of Whites are manipulated by the universities, schools and media into supporting policies that are disastrous for themselves. I'm just stating facts.

    At no point during the whole campaign did I seriously believe Britain would leave.

    Either way, though, he probably won’t win so you might as well make the best of it.

    No nationalist party in Western Europe is going to get anywhere close to power except maybe in Austria.

    Should we expect you to achieve 0 for 3 or 1 for 3?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. L.K says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    This is a very insightful and penetrating analysis.
     
    But what analysis? He poses a rhetorical question in the title, which has a fairly obvious answer, and then fails to provide the answer.

    The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad. Of course, there is hardly any real antisemitism in the West, at least in the sense of a hatred of Jews just for being Jews. The lack of antisemitism is a problem for them ideologically, not its presence.

    Generally speaking, the purpose of all the synthetic terrorist events in which Muslims are framed is a strategy of tension. The resulting tension is quite useful to the Zionist power structure. That it could lead to negative outcomes for the ordinary Jewish person in France is not really a consideration for them.

    MacDonald is in a class by himself.
     
    Actually, Professor MacDonald seems to be in a class by himself in terms of a bounded understanding of the world. There are things he understands extremely well and I have learned from his writing. However, there are other things, like false flag terrorism, that he simply does not seem to understand at all -- unless he is being disingenuous, which is a possibility I have considered.

    Actually, Professor MacDonald seems to be in a class by himself in terms of a bounded understanding of the world. There are things he understands extremely well and I have learned from his writing. However, there are other things, like false flag terrorism, that he simply does not seem to understand at all — unless he is being disingenuous, which is a possibility I have considered.

    That is my feeling as well, very good point.
    On Jewish power, strategies and influence though, he really is unmatched.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    On Jewish power, strategies and influence though, he really is unmatched.
     
    Yeah, from another sort of angle, Philip Giraldi can be quite good, but there is again this sort of "limited hangout" problem, where people will tell the truth about a certain set of things, but then there are all these other things they won't touch. Of course, Giraldi is retired CIA, so...

    Professor MacDonald breaks the taboos of discussing Jewish power, and really drills down into the ideological constructs that are a big part of it. In fact, I think, in a previous draft of the last article I wrote, I even mentioned him by name, when I allude to the out-sized role of Jewish intellectuals in the whole "ARRF" thing, but then cut out that paragraph. But then this guy respects the CT taboo, believing (or pretending to believe) in this whole bogus "blowback" construct.

    It's a funny thing. That last article I wrote that was 12,000 words long, which is quite long, but then when I review what I wrote, I see more parts where I could have written far more, as opposed to less. The overall topic was so broad that some things were covered in a pretty cursory fashion really.

    I wrote a section with the heading "On being partially pregnant", and the idea I really wanted to put across was that, when it comes to this whole ideological construct (called ARRF in the article) it is probably futile to have this sort of bounded awareness of what one is up against. What you have with a lot of writers on this site is that they write all these anti-PC screeds but then they completely toe the line on the other ARRF strands. So, just for example, Anatoly Karlin, who is totally anti-PC, wrote recently that he would ban so-called "Holocaust deniers" from commenting. I mean, regardless of what he thinks really happened, what is there about "freedom of speech" that the poor boy doesn't understand?

    Or you have Fred Reed writing his pathetic hit piece about the wearers of "tin foil hats".... Anybody who was defending him after that, it was sort of like: "but Fred writes good stuff about other topics", which is true, I suppose. But the problem is that reality exists in all its facets and... can you really pick and choose?

    But anyway, the whole "bounded awareness" issue I was getting at there, I wrote far less about that than I could have. A lot of the whole "gatekeeper" phenomenon involves that. There is also this concept of "limited hangout", where they tell the truth about one thing or a few things, but then there are other key aspects that they continue to blow smoke about.

    The whole thing is a very complex issue nonetheless. You can learn things from gatekeepers, like Chomsky even. You can learn things from Chomsky, but then you have to finally understand that there are all these things he will just NEVER tell the truth about!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. L.K says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    Terrorism, after all is a strategy pursued by non-elite groups.
     
    This statement is completely wrong. Terrorism, particularly false flag terrorism, is something that the Zionists clearly specialize in. In fact, to be carried off successfully, a prerequisite is substantial control of the media. Remember how everybody knew for certain that Osama Bin Laden was behind 9/11 within a day.

    An elite group like American Jews pursue their interests in the MSM, the legislative process, and the judicial system—top-down influence that is far more compatible with oligarchy than democracy. (An oligarchic model fits U.S. politics much better than a democratic model
     
    Well, I am increasingly convinced that an oligarchic model, with different competing power factions, which is what the Western so-called "democracies" really are -- this is the environment in which synthetic events such as false flag terrorism flourish.

    What Professor MacDonald is saying is probably about 180 degrees away from the truth here. What is strange is that he is still the go-to guy on certain topics that relate to the Judaeo-Zionist power structure. It is very strange the extent of bounded awareness he shows.

    Professor MacDonald:

    Terrorism, after all is a strategy pursued by non-elite groups.

    J.R’s reaction:

    This statement is completely wrong. Terrorism, particularly false flag terrorism, is something that the Zionists clearly specialize in.

    I too cringed when I read that line by Prof.MacDonald.
    Ridiculous really.
    For one thing, State terrorism is much more destructive than non State terror and for another thing, ZUSA, Israel, England and others are all supporters of non state terror groups.
    In fact, there would be no ISIS without ZUSA.
    The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom – noted:

    Because the United States itself has a long record of supporting terrorists and using terrorist tactics, the slogans of today’s war on terrorism merely makes the United States look hypocritical to the rest of the world.

    Odom also said:

    By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.

    The Washington Post reported in 2010:

    The United States has long been an exporter of terrorism, according to a secret CIA analysis released Wednesday by the Web site WikiLeaks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. Talha says:
    @Gabriel M

    Did he completely miss out on that rule? His rulings were sought from the Jews of Yemen, North Africa, Levant, etc. Is there any proof he told Jewish people that they should go and live in that area now that the Crusaders had been kicked out and it was open for settlement because of the prohibition to live permanently elsewhere?
     
    He went to live there and left because he couldn't make a living. The community there was on the brink of starvation after the ravages of 100s of years of war. As Maimonides writes himself, it is permitted to leave the land of Israel in order to earn a living (as well to find a wife or to study Torah).

    If you want to read what Maimonides wrote on the commandment to live in Israel go here:

    http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1188349/jewish/Melachim-uMilchamot-Chapter-5.htm

    Start at law 9.

    Hey Gabriel,

    Very, very interesting stuff – thanks much for the link. It seems like, at least from a practical perspective, this has been basically disregarded for much of history – or at least the practical exemption for leaving to earn a living, makes it mostly a non-issue.

    Also interesting that it declares Egypt a no-go area, but that the Rabbi himself lived, taught and died in it due to practicing on the exemptions from the general rule.

    Peace.

    Note: The flow of the language and style of the text (not content) is very familiar to anyone who has read texts of Muslim jurists – that’s pretty cool. :)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gabriel M
    The vast majority of Jews historical believed that they the Messiah would bring them back to Israel and that he would have semi-magic powers, so they did not need to actually do much. Rashi writes explicitly that the third temple will literally fall from the sky.

    Maimonides himself strongly rejected this view. He writes explicitly that the Messiah will not have any magic powers and strongly implies he will only come after mass Jewish re-settlement. He himself failed to return to Israel, but you can see him as initiating a slow increase in the Jewish population that eventually culminated in the Zionist movement. (Even the (in)famous Neteurei Karta are the descendants of those who traveled to Israel to fulfill the commandment to settle the land so as to bring about the Messianic age).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. @Gabriel M

    The globalism that is pushed/accepted by the people you mention is hated by many whites across the globe. I wonder if Weimar era Jews were as delusional?
     
    It is hated by a small minority of Whites, strongly concentrated among the old and uneducated. No nationalist party in Western Europe is going to get anywhere close to power except maybe in Austria. Paris has been transformed into a warzone and Marine Le Pen - who is well to the Left of Trump - can't crack 30% of the vote, let alone the 30% she will actually need. UKIP, who are not even right-wing, have 1 MP despite the fact of mass sexual-slavery of indigenous girls by Pakistanis

    Again, I'm on the side of the old and uneducated. I understand perfectly well how the majority of Whites are manipulated by the universities, schools and media into supporting policies that are disastrous for themselves. I'm just stating facts.

    “It is hated by a small minority of Whites, strongly concentrated among the old and uneducated.”

    Globalism and multiculturalism are only hated by a small amount of whites worldwide, and mostly among the elderly and uneducated? That’s really your claim?

    First of all, when speaking of whites worldwide, you dismiss whites in Russia and much of central and eastern Europe, who tend to be against globalism and multiculturalism. I assume the same would be the case with many whites in the commonwealth nations outside of Canada.

    Populism and nationalism are definitely gaining steam in Europe. In Sweden, the Sweden Democrats and other right of center parties garner a higher percentage of votes, when combined, than the ruling party. Merkel is definitely unpopular, as are her counterparts throughout Europe. If you are going to move the goalposts and say that only neo-nazis can be counted as whites who oppose globalism and multiculturalism, then that’s a different argument than you or anyone else has made or responded to.

    The Globalist/Multicult order in Europe and North America is definitely being challenged by the natives, and the natives are mostly white. The game is just beginning, and I expect more whites to enter the opposition, as it becomes more obvious that the intent to destroy their nations, cultures, livelihoods, and possible their physical beings, becomes more obvious.

    As for France, the Global Left is definitely being challenged. The fact that LePen may not crack 30% means little, since her opponents aren’t doing much/any better, and some of those opponents are on the right. If Fillon, who is projected to beat her, and is also talking about cracking down on immigration, gets more votes, then the voters who are opponents of the Globalist System aren’t a tiny minority of the elderly and uneducated. What remains to be seen is how sincere the politicians really are.

    I’m not even sure what you consider uneducated, since most people, white or otherwise, don’t go to college. The “uneducated” and elderly make up a very large percentage of whites around the world, and their voices should be heard. Either way, it’s not those people who are mismanaging the world for their own benefit. Only time will tell if the opposition will become organized enough to topple the Global Leftists, but it’s possible that it will happen, and there is definitely a large group of whites in opposition. Conflict is likely when one group openly declares war on another.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. @Jonathan Revusky

    This is a very insightful and penetrating analysis.
     
    But what analysis? He poses a rhetorical question in the title, which has a fairly obvious answer, and then fails to provide the answer.

    The Zionists have an ideology in which the State of Israel must exist because it is a place for Jews to escape to, if antisemitism gets too bad. Of course, there is hardly any real antisemitism in the West, at least in the sense of a hatred of Jews just for being Jews. The lack of antisemitism is a problem for them ideologically, not its presence.

    Generally speaking, the purpose of all the synthetic terrorist events in which Muslims are framed is a strategy of tension. The resulting tension is quite useful to the Zionist power structure. That it could lead to negative outcomes for the ordinary Jewish person in France is not really a consideration for them.

    MacDonald is in a class by himself.
     
    Actually, Professor MacDonald seems to be in a class by himself in terms of a bounded understanding of the world. There are things he understands extremely well and I have learned from his writing. However, there are other things, like false flag terrorism, that he simply does not seem to understand at all -- unless he is being disingenuous, which is a possibility I have considered.

    Actually, Professor MacDonald seems to be in a class by himself in terms of a bounded understanding of the world. There are things he understands extremely well and I have learned from his writing. However, there are other things, like false flag terrorism, that he simply does not seem to understand at all — unless he is being disingenuous, which is a possibility I have considered.

    Do you think there is any real terrorism? I’m not that familiar with your views, so I’m asking. I don’t buy the official 9-11 story, but I do believe that some terrorism is due to blowback or actual anti-western views.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    Do you think there is any real terrorism?
     
    I suppose you mean terrorism that is not a false flag of some sort. Hmm... I would hesitate to say there is none, but every major terrorist event that I have studied in detailed does seem to be a false flag of some sort.

    The article in which I analyzed the "blowback" concept and expressed my own doubts about the concept is this one:

    http://www.unz.com/article/a-framework-for-reclaiming-reality/

    I don’t buy the official 9-11 story, but I do believe that some terrorism is due to blowback or actual anti-western views.
     
    Well, okay. So which specific events are in that category then?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. Art says:
    @Clearpoint
    And exactly what did they do that merits the accumulation of all that wealth? The Rothschild parasites figured out a way to insert themselves in between nearly every human economic transaction and extract a toll out of it. So, yes, I agree. Economic productivity is not the problem. If it were, the Rothschilds' would never have been able to accumulate such wealth. As a matter of fact, economic productivity of the recent past has been so great as to mask the real problem---that being the equitable distribution of responsibility for, and benefits of, that economic productivity.

    There are a lot of toll booths that feed off of the productive economy. The Jewish created system of privately held banks, money creation, and financial capitalism, of which the Rothschild empire is the flagship for, is by far the worst of them. Eventually this system must be destroyed for humanity to advance forward.

    There are a lot of toll booths that feed off of the productive economy. The Jewish created system of privately held banks, money creation, and financial capitalism, of which the Rothschild empire is the flagship for, is by far the worst of them. Eventually this system must be destroyed for humanity to advance forward.

    The Rothschild family cabal has so much power that ALL the worlds mainstream journalists refuse to write about their wealth. They NEVER make any list of the world’s most wealthy. Not even the left who hate capitalists, will write about them. Only raw naked fear can accomplish that.

    The Rothschilds are the pride of Judaism.

    Peace — Art

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. Svigor says:

    I think my “ignoramus theory” is that the majority American Jews believe in liberalism, in line with the great majority of Whites worldwide. Apparently, being confronted with the simple fact that the majority of Whites around the world despise you causes you to get angry and start rambling. I sympathise, but one has to learn to deal with these things.

    The overwhelming bulk of American Jews are phony leftists. They pose as leftists. But it’s all a sham; they’re just fine with right-wing-run, Apartheid Israel.

    You counter-argument is that most American Jews are pro-Israel so their liberalism can’t be sincere.

    1) All liberals are somewhat hypocritical about things that affect them personally.

    This one’s way too big to just dismiss like that. Apartheid Israel is far and away the most oppressive “western” country. USA treats Israel better than Britian, France, or Germany, while Israel acts like Apartheid South Africa. And it’s not really “personal” at all for the vast majority of American Jews, it’s ethnic, racial – precisely the sort of thing that (white) leftists are supposed to be squared-away on (all of them except the Jews, apparently). This is not a mere peccadillo, this is a deal-breaker. It invalidates their leftism, shows it up for phony. It would be like White leftists giving the Nazis a pass.

    2)

    Adding numbers does not give your argument more weight.

    3) American Jews do not have significantly different views about Israel to Americans in general.

    Nonsense. Jews are much more informed about Israel. A great many Americans in general are not. Jews have a lot to do with that situation. And insofar as leftists are simpatico with American views on Israel (which are very right-wing), their leftism is phony as Hell, too.

    But yes, it is odd how 71% of Jews voted for Hillary, in stark contrast with American Whites, who broke strongly for Trump, yet, there’s so much less daylight in between the two on Israel. Almost as if Jews’ leftism was phony…

    4) Israel is really not anywhere near as right-wing as you imagine it to be and so the degree of hypocrisy is not as significant as you imagine.

    In other words, I’m not as right-wing as all of that. Because a White Israel would be good enough for me. Please tell your fellow tribesmen, who scream “HIIIITTTLLLEERRR!!!” every time anyone asks for a White Israel (because they’re phony leftists).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gabriel M

    In other words, I’m not as right-wing as all of that. Because a White Israel would be good enough for me.
     
    Really? You want a country the size of New Jersey, with a 25% non-white population and an Arab on your supreme court? Honestly, I think you can do better, aim high man.

    But yes, it is odd how 71% of Jews voted for Hillary, in stark contrast with American Whites,
     
    And in absolute conformity to non-American Whites. (Actually, not quite, Europeans favoured Hillary almost as much as American blacks).

    This is not a mere peccadillo, this is a deal-breaker. It invalidates their leftism, shows it up for phony. It would be like White leftists giving the Nazis a pass.
     
    Except it's not, because Israel is nothing like Nazi Germany. Essentially, you believe that for anyone to be honest they have to accept the most extreme Communist/Muslim caricature of Israel, which you have accepted solely because you are dishonest.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. Many prominent rabbis could be that prove this has nothing to do with Jewish memory and everything to do with Jewish agenda: The destruction of European culture both here and in Europe! (George Soros is instrumental in flooding Europe with ‘refugees’ many from central Africa and many are violent rapists!). This is because the white races have seen the ruse of the Jewish nation destroyers and expelled them from dozens of their countries with Germany being only the latest one. The reason they don’t want refugees in Israel is obvious. Israel is the only country to love and support.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  99. L.K says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    Terrorism, after all is a strategy pursued by non-elite groups.
     
    This statement is completely wrong. Terrorism, particularly false flag terrorism, is something that the Zionists clearly specialize in. In fact, to be carried off successfully, a prerequisite is substantial control of the media. Remember how everybody knew for certain that Osama Bin Laden was behind 9/11 within a day.

    An elite group like American Jews pursue their interests in the MSM, the legislative process, and the judicial system—top-down influence that is far more compatible with oligarchy than democracy. (An oligarchic model fits U.S. politics much better than a democratic model
     
    Well, I am increasingly convinced that an oligarchic model, with different competing power factions, which is what the Western so-called "democracies" really are -- this is the environment in which synthetic events such as false flag terrorism flourish.

    What Professor MacDonald is saying is probably about 180 degrees away from the truth here. What is strange is that he is still the go-to guy on certain topics that relate to the Judaeo-Zionist power structure. It is very strange the extent of bounded awareness he shows.

    Hey J.Revusky,

    Although Corbett, Sibel et al., also have their own no go zones – how can anyone seriously discuss all this stuff going on in the Mena region without mentioning the Zios?? – they do bring up a lot of interesting points to the table in the following debate:
    Who Is REALLY Behind the EU Migrant Crisis?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Have to disagree and wonder, what is the author trying to do? “And Jewish attitudes are primarily determined by their hostility towards whites.” So called Jews are white, they know it we know it, but they are chosen and that’s the difference. Chosen by the Family that inherited its Jew-ism from its genetic people, who were and are white, Caucasian. It just so happens the Family, actually the man, the King, who/that decides who is and who isn’t Jew, just like Hitler decided who was a Jew and who wasn’t a Jew, usually the Jew was the one that was more than glad to commit acts of terrorism against Germany and the German people. Just like today there are people not Jews who are more than willing to see Israel turned back over to the Palestinians, or any and other bad thing(s) happen to the people in Israel, the people who call themselves Jews, not Israelite’s, there is a huge difference there/here too, but, Jews don’t like to talk about that. Hitler, had a huge Jewish army, that is a huge army of white men and women who called themselves Jews. I do digress.
    So, what is the reason the white Jews, Ashkenazi Jews, like to see the nations of white people not white Jews torn apart by whatever means they, the Ashkenazi’s white Jews, can muster? It is an old saying and easily understood, doesn’t need one with a cardboard placard on the wall to delineate either: killing two birds with one stone, or, getting half the poor people to kill the other half; either way, say it ither way, the Family, the King, that is in a hurry to depopulate a bunch of us before we destroy their Earth, cannot lose, they think. Israel, isn’t wanting to be -just loaded down, with nuclear weapons for funnies and the Family, the King, don’t live in Israel, for good reasons. In the end it isn’t “Jew” against anyone else, it is Jew against everyone else, which is fine with me as long as I and the people I love, make the cut. The alive cut, not the other.
    I hope this gets published, but I doubt it will. Why? Because it is too simple, to much truth, simple, plain, back-alley truth. You know, the way the world of rich and poor really works.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  101. One solution to ending Jewish power in the US is to criminalize the seditious activities of Jewish organizations such as the ACLU and ADL and AIPAC.

    ACLU lobbies the federal court system for more illicit federal entitlements for victim cult people.

    ADL lobbies the US president and congress for more illicit federal entitlements for victim cult people.

    AIPAC lobbies congress for more illicit federal entitlements for the Jewish victim cult state of Israel.

    The federal entitlement brokerage performed by Jewish organizations is coordinated with Jewish-owned broadcast media to not only grant more illicit federal entitlements to victim cultists, but also to steer national elections in favor of victim cult supporting politicians.

    [MORE]

    Women are federally entitled because of Male oppression
    Jewish are federally entitled because of Gentile oppression
    Queers are federally entitled because of Straight oppression
    Muslims are federally entitled because of Christian oppression
    Disabled are federally entitled because of Healthy oppression
    Afro-blacks are federally entitled because of White oppression
    Latinos are federally entitled because of Gringo oppression
    Hispanics are federally entitled because of Gringo oppression
    Military Veteran are federally entitled because of Militia oppression
    2-party System Dependents are federally entitled because of Independent oppression
    Aboriginals are federally entitled because of Paleface oppression
    Asians are federally entitled because of Occidental oppression
    National Socialist are federally entitled because of Local-state Government oppression
    Crony Capitalist are federally entitled because of Honest Businessmen oppression
    Crooks are federally entitled because of Law-Abiding people oppression
    Zionist are federally entitled because of Anti-Fascist oppression

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  102. HL says:

    They want them to feed on later ‘Pizza gate’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  103. @OilcanFloyd
    Actually, Professor MacDonald seems to be in a class by himself in terms of a bounded understanding of the world. There are things he understands extremely well and I have learned from his writing. However, there are other things, like false flag terrorism, that he simply does not seem to understand at all — unless he is being disingenuous, which is a possibility I have considered.

    Do you think there is any real terrorism? I'm not that familiar with your views, so I'm asking. I don't buy the official 9-11 story, but I do believe that some terrorism is due to blowback or actual anti-western views.

    Do you think there is any real terrorism?

    I suppose you mean terrorism that is not a false flag of some sort. Hmm… I would hesitate to say there is none, but every major terrorist event that I have studied in detailed does seem to be a false flag of some sort.

    The article in which I analyzed the “blowback” concept and expressed my own doubts about the concept is this one:

    http://www.unz.com/article/a-framework-for-reclaiming-reality/

    I don’t buy the official 9-11 story, but I do believe that some terrorism is due to blowback or actual anti-western views.

    Well, okay. So which specific events are in that category then?

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    I mean terrorism that isn't a false flag event. My guess is that most large scale attacks are likely false flag, even if the actual terrorists are ignorant patsies who have little to do with the actual planning of the attack.

    The beheading of the British soldier, Lee Rigby, and some of the attacks on U.S. military bases, recruiting stations and soldiers by Muslim soldiers or radicals are likely legitimate attacks. I consider the rape epidemics and racial/ethnic/religious violence against the natives in places like Germany, Norway, Sweden and other European nations to be authentic forms of terrorism, and have seen the growing hostility among Muslims and other immigrants when traveling. It's obvious that there are many who would carry out attacks if they could, and many more who cheer the attacks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. @L.K

    Actually, Professor MacDonald seems to be in a class by himself in terms of a bounded understanding of the world. There are things he understands extremely well and I have learned from his writing. However, there are other things, like false flag terrorism, that he simply does not seem to understand at all — unless he is being disingenuous, which is a possibility I have considered.
     
    That is my feeling as well, very good point.
    On Jewish power, strategies and influence though, he really is unmatched.

    On Jewish power, strategies and influence though, he really is unmatched.

    Yeah, from another sort of angle, Philip Giraldi can be quite good, but there is again this sort of “limited hangout” problem, where people will tell the truth about a certain set of things, but then there are all these other things they won’t touch. Of course, Giraldi is retired CIA, so…

    Professor MacDonald breaks the taboos of discussing Jewish power, and really drills down into the ideological constructs that are a big part of it. In fact, I think, in a previous draft of the last article I wrote, I even mentioned him by name, when I allude to the out-sized role of Jewish intellectuals in the whole “ARRF” thing, but then cut out that paragraph. But then this guy respects the CT taboo, believing (or pretending to believe) in this whole bogus “blowback” construct.

    It’s a funny thing. That last article I wrote that was 12,000 words long, which is quite long, but then when I review what I wrote, I see more parts where I could have written far more, as opposed to less. The overall topic was so broad that some things were covered in a pretty cursory fashion really.

    I wrote a section with the heading “On being partially pregnant”, and the idea I really wanted to put across was that, when it comes to this whole ideological construct (called ARRF in the article) it is probably futile to have this sort of bounded awareness of what one is up against. What you have with a lot of writers on this site is that they write all these anti-PC screeds but then they completely toe the line on the other ARRF strands. So, just for example, Anatoly Karlin, who is totally anti-PC, wrote recently that he would ban so-called “Holocaust deniers” from commenting. I mean, regardless of what he thinks really happened, what is there about “freedom of speech” that the poor boy doesn’t understand?

    Or you have Fred Reed writing his pathetic hit piece about the wearers of “tin foil hats”…. Anybody who was defending him after that, it was sort of like: “but Fred writes good stuff about other topics”, which is true, I suppose. But the problem is that reality exists in all its facets and… can you really pick and choose?

    But anyway, the whole “bounded awareness” issue I was getting at there, I wrote far less about that than I could have. A lot of the whole “gatekeeper” phenomenon involves that. There is also this concept of “limited hangout”, where they tell the truth about one thing or a few things, but then there are other key aspects that they continue to blow smoke about.

    The whole thing is a very complex issue nonetheless. You can learn things from gatekeepers, like Chomsky even. You can learn things from Chomsky, but then you have to finally understand that there are all these things he will just NEVER tell the truth about!

    Read More
    • Replies: @L.K
    J.R:

    But anyway, the whole “bounded awareness” issue I was getting at there, I wrote far less about that than I could have. A lot of the whole “gatekeeper” phenomenon involves that. There is also this concept of “limited hangout”, where they tell the truth about one thing or a few things, but then there are other key aspects that they continue to blow smoke about.
     
    I totally agree and it can be quite annoying.

    Take care and keep writing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. shropster says:
    @joe webb
    I am unable to perceive a conclusion here. The jews need to be able leave any country. OK. Whites are a far greater danger to Jews than a few muslims.ok White guilt can be tapped and it is good to keep whites feeling guilty, especially about jews. OK. Lawrence Auster says that exclusion policies could be used against jews. OK. Curbs on free speech is a jewish goal and curbing anti muslim speech by whites is good for the Jews, since it can be used to keep hostile White sentiment toward jews under control as well. OK.

    1."As a result, the consensus view among Jews seems to be that the transformation of the West is manageable." 2. yet, that Muslim votes here in the US could become a dangerous factor. 3. that the Dem Party is about split now on Israel. 3. Jews are worried. OK.

    The fundamental question , per the title, is why jews support muslim immigration. I don't think you have completely covered it.

    First, America, the most Protestant Nation of all Protestant Nations, and the only one that takes its religion seriously, in NEVER going to abandon the holy jews. That can be seen at every level of social and political and media reality, especially Fox News. Trump could be a joker, but I doubt it.

    Second, the chances of large muslim voting is nearly nil. When T. and the American populace, not the liberals, get done with it, the muzzies will be lucky if they can stay, let alone vote. However , again, Protestantism and even the Catholics now, luv the jews. It may be that only casual religious folks and the non-religious will really get straight with the jews. That does not mean that the Jewish Wars cannot be stopped. Trump has got himself in the hard place/rock place with his words so far re Israel and Isis, and so on.

    Third, like you said right off the bat, jews hate whites far far more than muzzies...in the US of course. The old Divide and Conquer strategy, taking up the Negroes as a holy Oppressed people and getting us Whites to fight over it, that is fundamental to jewish strategies here. Same thing can apply to muzzies, but will likely Not be at all successful, except for jewyorktimes and hollywood.

    Therefore, jews are stuck with their race equality song and dance, despite the obvious hypocrisy with regard to the Judenstaat. This is overlooked by Whites because of holocaust stories and religion. Jews get to be the great exception to consistency in the immigration wars. God wants them to be exempt from criticism of any type. but nothing lasts forever.

    So it remains Divide Whites and Conquer them. Nevertheless, anti-Jew feeling is mounting and all these jewish shenanigans are eroding their privileged place
    in the White psyche, especially among young folks and Dem Party anti-zionist folks.

    As Thomas Mann put it in Dr. Faustus (I think it was) "you jews are soon to be in real jewish
    trouble.'

    Joe Webb

    “anti-Jew feeling is mounting and all these jewish shenanigans are eroding their privileged place in the White psyche” – It’s about time. Israel is not our ally and never has been.

    We need to get our troops out of the Middle East and let Rothschild, Inc. finace the entity that they have created and hire mercinaries to protect Israel from the Arabs.
    No more American blood should be lost to fight Israel’s wars!!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. Miro23 says:

    It’s a good article from McDonald but maybe the reality is just Anglo tiredness with Jewish activism.

    After all, it was US Anglos who built a tremendously successful state, that from the 1880′s managed to take world technological and industrial leadership. They also tipped the balance in two world wars against racist Imperialism and cemented the position of Democracy as the basic Western political system (mutually respecting states governed by the rule of law).

    This was no small achievement, and it attracted immigrants from around the world wishing to join the project and become Americans and be successfully integrated through the “melting pot” (a new “America First” identity regardless of race).

    The problem is that the US is now facing the same issues that European states have experienced at least since the Middle Ages – having Jewish minorities who wish to live in closed communities, with their own loyalties, promote racial intermarriage and generally live apart. The solution in the Middle Ages was to accept the reality and categorize Jews as Jews rather than Germans, Russians, Hungarians etc. and letting them form mini states-within-a-state with restricted trades and excluded from national government ( a sort of directed Foreign Resident status).

    Democracy doesn’t work this way. The assumption (false) is that US Jewry is American First, the same as everyone else, with ethnicity being secondary or irrelevant, but in reality and unsurprisingly, a large section of US Jewry is Jewish first and always has been. And they have found that their traditional system of Jewish racial patronage in employment/advancement can give spectacular results when played on a level playing field, or better still, a diversity promoting one.

    Result that 98% of America doesn’t want to be dictated to by a 2% Jewish elite, with PC speech rules, an economy distorted to favour Jewish interests and a foreign policy aimed at arming, financing and politically supporting an exclusively Jewish racial state.

    The 9/11 Coup was probably an attempt to formalize (through a dictatorship) informal Jewish US power , but its failure only served to destabilize further the whole situation with the Jewish directed MSM frantically shutting down “Conspiracy Theory” talk.

    So in the end it probably comes down to 98% unity, particularly the Anglo part (newly starting to see themselves as White Anglos rather than Americans). A peaceful pushback would involve excluding special interest access to Congressmen (during and after Congressional service), obliging Congressmen to truly represent the wishes of their voters, and clearing out multiculturalism for the government, media and schools (stop accepting a hyphenated American identity).

    Read More
    • Replies: @L.K
    miro23: "it was US Anglos who built a tremendously successful state, that from the 1880′s managed to take world technological and industrial leadership. They also tipped the balance in two world wars against racist Imperialism and cemented the position of Democracy as the basic Western political system (mutually respecting states governed by the rule of law)."

    Yours is a romantic but largely false account of US history. BTW, in the world wars you fought on the side of the main Imperial powers... in fact ZUSA was already an Empire then.
    As another poster wrote once:

    All US wars have been wars of choice triggered by the smell of weakness and the opportunity for easy pickings. Cutting through the thick fog of high-minded rhetoric and other mumbo-jumbo it’s apparent the US is a bandit state cruising the world for victims to waylay. That’s it in a nutshell, it’s a gangster state that has smaller accomplices such as Britain, roaming around looking for the next score. This is the history of the US; once it consolidated itself territorially it saw the weakness of Spain and moved in, grabbing properties such as the Philippines which thus inserted it into Asia and made it an Asian power also. From that point on it’s been on the move ever since, whenever the chance presented itself. Here and there it’s suffered a bloody rebuff such as in Korea and Vietnam when it miscalculated it’s strength and underestimated the other. The US is a country that’s been almost continually at war or actively interfering in other countries just about every single year since 1898.
    The average American of course desires peace, stability and an increasing standard of living. They’ve been propagandized into thinking that the US is a peaceful state that has to protect itself now and then. The truth is the very opposite, that war is the natural state of being for the US and it is an aggressive country always on the march. Always was, is now, and will continue to be so until it hits the wall of resistance of other countries big enough to defend themselves. Force is what it understands and respects, nothing else. Once people realize this then it all becomes very clear.
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. @Jonathan Revusky

    Do you think there is any real terrorism?
     
    I suppose you mean terrorism that is not a false flag of some sort. Hmm... I would hesitate to say there is none, but every major terrorist event that I have studied in detailed does seem to be a false flag of some sort.

    The article in which I analyzed the "blowback" concept and expressed my own doubts about the concept is this one:

    http://www.unz.com/article/a-framework-for-reclaiming-reality/

    I don’t buy the official 9-11 story, but I do believe that some terrorism is due to blowback or actual anti-western views.
     
    Well, okay. So which specific events are in that category then?

    I mean terrorism that isn’t a false flag event. My guess is that most large scale attacks are likely false flag, even if the actual terrorists are ignorant patsies who have little to do with the actual planning of the attack.

    The beheading of the British soldier, Lee Rigby, and some of the attacks on U.S. military bases, recruiting stations and soldiers by Muslim soldiers or radicals are likely legitimate attacks. I consider the rape epidemics and racial/ethnic/religious violence against the natives in places like Germany, Norway, Sweden and other European nations to be authentic forms of terrorism, and have seen the growing hostility among Muslims and other immigrants when traveling. It’s obvious that there are many who would carry out attacks if they could, and many more who cheer the attacks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    The beheading of the British soldier, Lee Rigby, and some of the attacks on U.S. military bases, recruiting stations and soldiers by Muslim soldiers or radicals are likely legitimate attacks.
     
    Possibly, but I doubt it. All that shit is fake too.

    I consider the rape epidemics and racial/ethnic/religious violence against the natives in places like Germany, Norway, Sweden and other European nations to be authentic forms of terrorism
     
    If it was actually happening, then I guess it would be...

    But that's all a hoax too. All these mass sexual assaults in wide open public places, why is there no video of any of these things?


    and have seen the growing hostility among Muslims and other immigrants when traveling.
     
    Oh really? What specifically did you see? Where?

    It’s obvious that there are many who would carry out attacks if they could, and many more who cheer the attacks.

     

    Obvious, eh? What people are you talking about? The Pakistani greengrocer where I buy my veggies? My Moroccan cleaning lady?

    I don't think that any of the Muslims that I know would carry out any attacks or even "cheer them on". I mean, one infers that you're talking about people you've actually met or observed.

    Who? Where? When? Could you be a bit more precise?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. Z-man says:

    Besides the Jew’s rabid support for the Ethno religious zealot state of Israel is its unflinching goal of destroying Western Christian civilization. As MacDonald says himself, ‘the view among Jews seems to be that the transformation of the West is manageable.’ Hopefully this will boomerang and save the West and expose Satan.
    A pox on them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  109. @OilcanFloyd
    I mean terrorism that isn't a false flag event. My guess is that most large scale attacks are likely false flag, even if the actual terrorists are ignorant patsies who have little to do with the actual planning of the attack.

    The beheading of the British soldier, Lee Rigby, and some of the attacks on U.S. military bases, recruiting stations and soldiers by Muslim soldiers or radicals are likely legitimate attacks. I consider the rape epidemics and racial/ethnic/religious violence against the natives in places like Germany, Norway, Sweden and other European nations to be authentic forms of terrorism, and have seen the growing hostility among Muslims and other immigrants when traveling. It's obvious that there are many who would carry out attacks if they could, and many more who cheer the attacks.

    The beheading of the British soldier, Lee Rigby, and some of the attacks on U.S. military bases, recruiting stations and soldiers by Muslim soldiers or radicals are likely legitimate attacks.

    Possibly, but I doubt it. All that shit is fake too.

    I consider the rape epidemics and racial/ethnic/religious violence against the natives in places like Germany, Norway, Sweden and other European nations to be authentic forms of terrorism

    If it was actually happening, then I guess it would be…

    But that’s all a hoax too. All these mass sexual assaults in wide open public places, why is there no video of any of these things?

    and have seen the growing hostility among Muslims and other immigrants when traveling.

    Oh really? What specifically did you see? Where?

    It’s obvious that there are many who would carry out attacks if they could, and many more who cheer the attacks.

    Obvious, eh? What people are you talking about? The Pakistani greengrocer where I buy my veggies? My Moroccan cleaning lady?

    I don’t think that any of the Muslims that I know would carry out any attacks or even “cheer them on”. I mean, one infers that you’re talking about people you’ve actually met or observed.

    Who? Where? When? Could you be a bit more precise?

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    I'm not attacking you, Mr. Revusky. Mostly, I'm interested in your opinions.


    Possibly, but I doubt it. All that shit is fake too.

    Why would you say that the beheading of Rigby, or the other shootings that I mentioned, were faked? What about the attacks on tour buses/tourists in Egypt? That's happened several times over the last two or three decades. Do you think there are no extremists who would attack western targets? Do you think terrorists don't exist?

    Oh really? What specifically did you see? Where?

    There are places that I travel to where I have seen changes as more Muslims and immigrants have moved in. The hostility is definitely there. Do you not take seriously the claims of no-go areas in many European cities or a clash between cultures? There are areas in many American cities where it's wise not to go if you are not of the right ethnic or racial background, which usually means white. Why is it so far-fetched to believe that minorities and immigrants in Europe would also be similarly hostile or protective of their new-found turf?

    But that’s all a hoax too. All these mass sexual assaults in wide open public places, why is there no video of any of these things?

    Why is there no video? The videos I've seen of Koln that night just show chaos. I would guess that the men who attacked the women did so in large groups against vulnerable women, so there was no one who could get close enough to film, if anyone were there to do so. I don't know. Given the way that the mayor and police chief of Koln responded, I doubt that they would make footage from public cameras available to the press. If the U.S. authorities have it in their interests to hide the truth behind 9-11, the German authorities definitely have an interest in hiding the Koln attacks. The Swedish, Norwegian and other European governments also have an interest in downplaying the rape culture that has developed among their own migrants, minorities and immigrants. The violence and rape is a form of terrorism.

    It's interesting to me that so many people who are suspicious of 9-11, and many of the other suspicious acts that seem too outrageous to believe, are unwilling to believe that there are actual terrorists and people who sympathize with them. They are kind of like the people in the U.S. who deny that BLM actually killed/attacked the police because they hate white cops, and that there are people who support their actions, or people who deny that there could possibly be actual racial animosity behind interracial crime and rapes in the U.S. when whites are the victims. I don't know what your actual views are on those issues, but I know people who fit the mold.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. L.K says:
    @Miro23
    It's a good article from McDonald but maybe the reality is just Anglo tiredness with Jewish activism.

    After all, it was US Anglos who built a tremendously successful state, that from the 1880's managed to take world technological and industrial leadership. They also tipped the balance in two world wars against racist Imperialism and cemented the position of Democracy as the basic Western political system (mutually respecting states governed by the rule of law).

    This was no small achievement, and it attracted immigrants from around the world wishing to join the project and become Americans and be successfully integrated through the "melting pot" (a new "America First" identity regardless of race).

    The problem is that the US is now facing the same issues that European states have experienced at least since the Middle Ages - having Jewish minorities who wish to live in closed communities, with their own loyalties, promote racial intermarriage and generally live apart. The solution in the Middle Ages was to accept the reality and categorize Jews as Jews rather than Germans, Russians, Hungarians etc. and letting them form mini states-within-a-state with restricted trades and excluded from national government ( a sort of directed Foreign Resident status).

    Democracy doesn't work this way. The assumption (false) is that US Jewry is American First, the same as everyone else, with ethnicity being secondary or irrelevant, but in reality and unsurprisingly, a large section of US Jewry is Jewish first and always has been. And they have found that their traditional system of Jewish racial patronage in employment/advancement can give spectacular results when played on a level playing field, or better still, a diversity promoting one.

    Result that 98% of America doesn't want to be dictated to by a 2% Jewish elite, with PC speech rules, an economy distorted to favour Jewish interests and a foreign policy aimed at arming, financing and politically supporting an exclusively Jewish racial state.

    The 9/11 Coup was probably an attempt to formalize (through a dictatorship) informal Jewish US power , but its failure only served to destabilize further the whole situation with the Jewish directed MSM frantically shutting down "Conspiracy Theory" talk.

    So in the end it probably comes down to 98% unity, particularly the Anglo part (newly starting to see themselves as White Anglos rather than Americans). A peaceful pushback would involve excluding special interest access to Congressmen (during and after Congressional service), obliging Congressmen to truly represent the wishes of their voters, and clearing out multiculturalism for the government, media and schools (stop accepting a hyphenated American identity).

    miro23: “it was US Anglos who built a tremendously successful state, that from the 1880′s managed to take world technological and industrial leadership. They also tipped the balance in two world wars against racist Imperialism and cemented the position of Democracy as the basic Western political system (mutually respecting states governed by the rule of law).”

    Yours is a romantic but largely false account of US history. BTW, in the world wars you fought on the side of the main Imperial powers… in fact ZUSA was already an Empire then.
    As another poster wrote once:

    All US wars have been wars of choice triggered by the smell of weakness and the opportunity for easy pickings. Cutting through the thick fog of high-minded rhetoric and other mumbo-jumbo it’s apparent the US is a bandit state cruising the world for victims to waylay. That’s it in a nutshell, it’s a gangster state that has smaller accomplices such as Britain, roaming around looking for the next score. This is the history of the US; once it consolidated itself territorially it saw the weakness of Spain and moved in, grabbing properties such as the Philippines which thus inserted it into Asia and made it an Asian power also. From that point on it’s been on the move ever since, whenever the chance presented itself. Here and there it’s suffered a bloody rebuff such as in Korea and Vietnam when it miscalculated it’s strength and underestimated the other. The US is a country that’s been almost continually at war or actively interfering in other countries just about every single year since 1898.
    The average American of course desires peace, stability and an increasing standard of living. They’ve been propagandized into thinking that the US is a peaceful state that has to protect itself now and then. The truth is the very opposite, that war is the natural state of being for the US and it is an aggressive country always on the march. Always was, is now, and will continue to be so until it hits the wall of resistance of other countries big enough to defend themselves. Force is what it understands and respects, nothing else. Once people realize this then it all becomes very clear.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23
    It was the US that pioneered commercial electricity generation and high voltage transmission, mass production of automobiles and was the home of Edison, Marconi etc. The US was the world technological/industrial leader before and during the two world wars.

    I take WWI as the dividing line for Imperialism. Before 1914, Imperial projects (often mixed with ideas of racial superiority) were probably the norm for industrial powers including the US.

    So, in my opinion, the WW2 German and Japanese Imperial expansions happened in a world that had generally abandoned the Imperial idea. The fact is that the Japanese (in traditional Imperial style) wanted permanent domination over East Asia and regarded the native populations as racially inferior. Similarly Hitler had detailed plans for an Empire stretching to the Urals with the destruction of Slavic cities (Moscow and St Petersburg were to be demolished ) and the enslavement and removal of native populations.

    I think that without US participation it would have been far more difficult to roll back this evil, so the US was on the right side, even if it did have to ally with one of the world's worst mass murderers (Stalin).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. Miro23 says:
    @L.K
    miro23: "it was US Anglos who built a tremendously successful state, that from the 1880′s managed to take world technological and industrial leadership. They also tipped the balance in two world wars against racist Imperialism and cemented the position of Democracy as the basic Western political system (mutually respecting states governed by the rule of law)."

    Yours is a romantic but largely false account of US history. BTW, in the world wars you fought on the side of the main Imperial powers... in fact ZUSA was already an Empire then.
    As another poster wrote once:

    All US wars have been wars of choice triggered by the smell of weakness and the opportunity for easy pickings. Cutting through the thick fog of high-minded rhetoric and other mumbo-jumbo it’s apparent the US is a bandit state cruising the world for victims to waylay. That’s it in a nutshell, it’s a gangster state that has smaller accomplices such as Britain, roaming around looking for the next score. This is the history of the US; once it consolidated itself territorially it saw the weakness of Spain and moved in, grabbing properties such as the Philippines which thus inserted it into Asia and made it an Asian power also. From that point on it’s been on the move ever since, whenever the chance presented itself. Here and there it’s suffered a bloody rebuff such as in Korea and Vietnam when it miscalculated it’s strength and underestimated the other. The US is a country that’s been almost continually at war or actively interfering in other countries just about every single year since 1898.
    The average American of course desires peace, stability and an increasing standard of living. They’ve been propagandized into thinking that the US is a peaceful state that has to protect itself now and then. The truth is the very opposite, that war is the natural state of being for the US and it is an aggressive country always on the march. Always was, is now, and will continue to be so until it hits the wall of resistance of other countries big enough to defend themselves. Force is what it understands and respects, nothing else. Once people realize this then it all becomes very clear.
     

    It was the US that pioneered commercial electricity generation and high voltage transmission, mass production of automobiles and was the home of Edison, Marconi etc. The US was the world technological/industrial leader before and during the two world wars.

    I take WWI as the dividing line for Imperialism. Before 1914, Imperial projects (often mixed with ideas of racial superiority) were probably the norm for industrial powers including the US.

    So, in my opinion, the WW2 German and Japanese Imperial expansions happened in a world that had generally abandoned the Imperial idea. The fact is that the Japanese (in traditional Imperial style) wanted permanent domination over East Asia and regarded the native populations as racially inferior. Similarly Hitler had detailed plans for an Empire stretching to the Urals with the destruction of Slavic cities (Moscow and St Petersburg were to be demolished ) and the enslavement and removal of native populations.

    I think that without US participation it would have been far more difficult to roll back this evil, so the US was on the right side, even if it did have to ally with one of the world’s worst mass murderers (Stalin).

    Read More
    • Replies: @L.K
    Miro: "So, in my opinion, the WW2 German and Japanese Imperial expansions happened in a world that had generally abandoned the Imperial idea."

    Pure fiction.

    Also, you obviously still believe in what is, in point of fact, "history" by the victors, re WWII...
    A completely one-sided, synthetic narrative that does not have a leg to stand on.

    You would do well to use a bit of the curiosity that enabled you to pierce through the lies of 9-11 and apply it to other important subjects. The myth, and it is a myth, of the 'good war', would be a good starting point for you. Just saying...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. Jewish groups are all for bringing in large numbers of Muslims refugees into western countries, because it is good for further consolidation of Jewish power. Multiculturalism dilutes the cohesiveness of white people and in democratic societies, makes it easier for jews to control the country by forming human rights organizations and ethnic advocacy organizations and acting as lawyers and middlemen between these groups and government. Jews lobby for hate laws and special monies being set aside for ethnic community centers, while denying such monies for White ethnic groups. Professor McDonald is right that Jews use their historical memory of being denied as refugees (the right to come to such places as the United States and Canada in WW2) as a pretext to support their present day support of Muslim refugees. However, it is not out of humanitarianism that they do it. They do it because it is good for Jewish interests, no other interests exist as far as they are concerned.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    It should be noted that Islam is a form of “arabicized judaism”. Many of the “rules” in the jewish Talmud are virtually identical to the “rules” in the Koran. Both belief system operate with an air of supremacy of each respective “system”–relegating “outsiders” to inferior status, with special “taxes” levied by each respective system, as well as the supremacists in each group being immune from the equivalent of “justice” when wrongdoing is done to the “outsiders”… Having read both the Talmud and Koran, I have come to the above conclusion…
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. Anony says:

    Jews often support things that tend to destroy American culture and tradition, such as the Lgbt movement. They don’t identify with traditional American culture.

    It may also be a divide and conquer strategy by Jews. Rip America apart and pick up the pieces. Jews are wanderers, after all, not always tied to one country, especially not a Christian one.

    Look at the USSR. Was it Jewish Bolshevik or anti-Semitic? Could it be both? Is it still?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  114. L.K says:
    @Miro23
    It was the US that pioneered commercial electricity generation and high voltage transmission, mass production of automobiles and was the home of Edison, Marconi etc. The US was the world technological/industrial leader before and during the two world wars.

    I take WWI as the dividing line for Imperialism. Before 1914, Imperial projects (often mixed with ideas of racial superiority) were probably the norm for industrial powers including the US.

    So, in my opinion, the WW2 German and Japanese Imperial expansions happened in a world that had generally abandoned the Imperial idea. The fact is that the Japanese (in traditional Imperial style) wanted permanent domination over East Asia and regarded the native populations as racially inferior. Similarly Hitler had detailed plans for an Empire stretching to the Urals with the destruction of Slavic cities (Moscow and St Petersburg were to be demolished ) and the enslavement and removal of native populations.

    I think that without US participation it would have been far more difficult to roll back this evil, so the US was on the right side, even if it did have to ally with one of the world's worst mass murderers (Stalin).

    Miro: “So, in my opinion, the WW2 German and Japanese Imperial expansions happened in a world that had generally abandoned the Imperial idea.”

    Pure fiction.

    Also, you obviously still believe in what is, in point of fact, “history” by the victors, re WWII…
    A completely one-sided, synthetic narrative that does not have a leg to stand on.

    You would do well to use a bit of the curiosity that enabled you to pierce through the lies of 9-11 and apply it to other important subjects. The myth, and it is a myth, of the ‘good war’, would be a good starting point for you. Just saying…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. dr zimpf says:

    Once Jews have been allowed into Christian nations they have historically set about destroying those nations–culturally, morally, economically and ethnically– which explains why they’ve been expelled so often and sometimes exterminated. Jews have a blood curse upon them as shown in the New Testament after they participated in murdering Jesus. Judaism is a satanic, dead religion, and Jesus called them the “synagogue of Satan.” This invasion by third world savage Muslims into Europe and the US, was orchestrated by Jewish power entities, in fact the 1965 US immigration law was created by a Jewish swine known as Howard Metzenbaum. Jews HATE Christians even more than they hate Muslims. The Jews also believe–falsely–that by flooding America/Europe with savage Muslims, that this will somehow take any focus away from the Jewish-orchestrated pollution of the Christian west. But this will eventually backfire upon the Jews. Scripture tells us that a NEW true Holocaust is on the way. The last one took out 1 in 3 Jews–the final one will take 2 out of 3 and I suspect that Muslims will play a major role in this.

    Read More
    • Agree: Z-man
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  116. @Jonathan Revusky

    The beheading of the British soldier, Lee Rigby, and some of the attacks on U.S. military bases, recruiting stations and soldiers by Muslim soldiers or radicals are likely legitimate attacks.
     
    Possibly, but I doubt it. All that shit is fake too.

    I consider the rape epidemics and racial/ethnic/religious violence against the natives in places like Germany, Norway, Sweden and other European nations to be authentic forms of terrorism
     
    If it was actually happening, then I guess it would be...

    But that's all a hoax too. All these mass sexual assaults in wide open public places, why is there no video of any of these things?


    and have seen the growing hostility among Muslims and other immigrants when traveling.
     
    Oh really? What specifically did you see? Where?

    It’s obvious that there are many who would carry out attacks if they could, and many more who cheer the attacks.

     

    Obvious, eh? What people are you talking about? The Pakistani greengrocer where I buy my veggies? My Moroccan cleaning lady?

    I don't think that any of the Muslims that I know would carry out any attacks or even "cheer them on". I mean, one infers that you're talking about people you've actually met or observed.

    Who? Where? When? Could you be a bit more precise?

    I’m not attacking you, Mr. Revusky. Mostly, I’m interested in your opinions.

    Possibly, but I doubt it. All that shit is fake too.

    Why would you say that the beheading of Rigby, or the other shootings that I mentioned, were faked? What about the attacks on tour buses/tourists in Egypt? That’s happened several times over the last two or three decades. Do you think there are no extremists who would attack western targets? Do you think terrorists don’t exist?

    Oh really? What specifically did you see? Where?

    There are places that I travel to where I have seen changes as more Muslims and immigrants have moved in. The hostility is definitely there. Do you not take seriously the claims of no-go areas in many European cities or a clash between cultures? There are areas in many American cities where it’s wise not to go if you are not of the right ethnic or racial background, which usually means white. Why is it so far-fetched to believe that minorities and immigrants in Europe would also be similarly hostile or protective of their new-found turf?

    But that’s all a hoax too. All these mass sexual assaults in wide open public places, why is there no video of any of these things?

    Why is there no video? The videos I’ve seen of Koln that night just show chaos. I would guess that the men who attacked the women did so in large groups against vulnerable women, so there was no one who could get close enough to film, if anyone were there to do so. I don’t know. Given the way that the mayor and police chief of Koln responded, I doubt that they would make footage from public cameras available to the press. If the U.S. authorities have it in their interests to hide the truth behind 9-11, the German authorities definitely have an interest in hiding the Koln attacks. The Swedish, Norwegian and other European governments also have an interest in downplaying the rape culture that has developed among their own migrants, minorities and immigrants. The violence and rape is a form of terrorism.

    It’s interesting to me that so many people who are suspicious of 9-11, and many of the other suspicious acts that seem too outrageous to believe, are unwilling to believe that there are actual terrorists and people who sympathize with them. They are kind of like the people in the U.S. who deny that BLM actually killed/attacked the police because they hate white cops, and that there are people who support their actions, or people who deny that there could possibly be actual racial animosity behind interracial crime and rapes in the U.S. when whites are the victims. I don’t know what your actual views are on those issues, but I know people who fit the mold.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    I’m not attacking you, Mr. Revusky.
     
    Well, I never said you were. I'm the one attacking you at this point. I see what a lying piece of shit you are and it's time now to cut the pretenses.

    Mostly, I’m interested in your opinions.
     
    I doubt it. You just have your talking points you are here to put out.


    Oh really? What specifically did you see? Where?
     
    There are places that I travel to where I have seen changes as more Muslims and immigrants have moved in.
     
    Sorry, dude. You just exposed yourself as a liar. I ask you specifically where and it's "There are places that I travel to" (WHERE?) and "I have seen changes..." (WHAT CHANGES?)

    No mention of even the continent where it was, much less the country or city???? What did you see? Where did you see it?

    You're obviously a shill.


    The videos I’ve seen of Koln that night just show chaos. I would guess that the men who attacked the women did so in large groups against vulnerable women, so there was no one who could get close enough to film, if anyone were there to do so. I don’t know.
     
    As far as I can tell, the reason there is no video that shows anything remotely like what is claimed happened is quite simple: it didn't happen. It's a psy-op hoax.

    But anyway, to me it's so utterly obvious that you are some kind of shill with a set of talking points that you are trying to put across here. A real participant, if he had traveled in whatever countries and observed whatever, if you asked him which countries, would name them. He wouldn't just respond with "There are places that I travel to that...". I can see this, but I can imagine that there are legitimate participants here who are so brainfucked that they are unable to see it. There are people here who are so stupid that they will come to your defense and say "Oh, why is that terrible Revusky guy attacking this legitimate participant Oilcan Floyd?"

    There are people on these various online forums who really are disinfo agents and I am pretty sure you are one of them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. L.K says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    On Jewish power, strategies and influence though, he really is unmatched.
     
    Yeah, from another sort of angle, Philip Giraldi can be quite good, but there is again this sort of "limited hangout" problem, where people will tell the truth about a certain set of things, but then there are all these other things they won't touch. Of course, Giraldi is retired CIA, so...

    Professor MacDonald breaks the taboos of discussing Jewish power, and really drills down into the ideological constructs that are a big part of it. In fact, I think, in a previous draft of the last article I wrote, I even mentioned him by name, when I allude to the out-sized role of Jewish intellectuals in the whole "ARRF" thing, but then cut out that paragraph. But then this guy respects the CT taboo, believing (or pretending to believe) in this whole bogus "blowback" construct.

    It's a funny thing. That last article I wrote that was 12,000 words long, which is quite long, but then when I review what I wrote, I see more parts where I could have written far more, as opposed to less. The overall topic was so broad that some things were covered in a pretty cursory fashion really.

    I wrote a section with the heading "On being partially pregnant", and the idea I really wanted to put across was that, when it comes to this whole ideological construct (called ARRF in the article) it is probably futile to have this sort of bounded awareness of what one is up against. What you have with a lot of writers on this site is that they write all these anti-PC screeds but then they completely toe the line on the other ARRF strands. So, just for example, Anatoly Karlin, who is totally anti-PC, wrote recently that he would ban so-called "Holocaust deniers" from commenting. I mean, regardless of what he thinks really happened, what is there about "freedom of speech" that the poor boy doesn't understand?

    Or you have Fred Reed writing his pathetic hit piece about the wearers of "tin foil hats".... Anybody who was defending him after that, it was sort of like: "but Fred writes good stuff about other topics", which is true, I suppose. But the problem is that reality exists in all its facets and... can you really pick and choose?

    But anyway, the whole "bounded awareness" issue I was getting at there, I wrote far less about that than I could have. A lot of the whole "gatekeeper" phenomenon involves that. There is also this concept of "limited hangout", where they tell the truth about one thing or a few things, but then there are other key aspects that they continue to blow smoke about.

    The whole thing is a very complex issue nonetheless. You can learn things from gatekeepers, like Chomsky even. You can learn things from Chomsky, but then you have to finally understand that there are all these things he will just NEVER tell the truth about!

    J.R:

    But anyway, the whole “bounded awareness” issue I was getting at there, I wrote far less about that than I could have. A lot of the whole “gatekeeper” phenomenon involves that. There is also this concept of “limited hangout”, where they tell the truth about one thing or a few things, but then there are other key aspects that they continue to blow smoke about.

    I totally agree and it can be quite annoying.

    Take care and keep writing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. It is so transparent. Israel does not want any Muslims around them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    That pretty much covers it, Ilyana.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. @Ilyana Rozumova
    It is so transparent. Israel does not want any Muslims around them.

    That pretty much covers it, Ilyana.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. There’s another possible explanation for this phenomenon, that no one seems to have considered in this thread. For a people, a nation, to maintain their separate identity, genetics, and culture over a period of thousands of years, without a country, living as a minority in multiple different lands, is highly unusual. There are two major threats to such a group as the Jews. One is the direct physical threat of expulsion or destruction. The other is the more subtle threat of assimilation.

    If there is too much conflict between Jews and the host population, expulsion, eradication, or forced conversion (the cultural/ religious equivalent of eradication) are the major threats. If times are “too good,” with Jews treated well, and little conflict with the hosts, then the larger threat is assimilation. How can this be prevented?

    The social construct of “anti-Semitism” is essential to Jewish survival as a separate tribe. It enhances ethnic cohesion, and works to stop assimilation. There is no parallel concept with respect to any other minority group that I am aware of. “Anti-gypsyism?” Nah. One could argue that the others are subsumed under the more general rubric of “racism” simply due to Jewish control of the narrative and Jewish supremacism/ self-importance, but I don’t really think that adequately explains it. The idea that non-Jews commonly harbor a psychotic, irrational hatred for Jews qua Jews (as opposed to say, a generalized suspicion of, and dislike for, outsiders), for no reason at all, is a rather paranoid, deeply irrational concept that is just about unique to the Jewish people. Coincidentally (or not), the Jews have survived as a coherent group in the diaspora for thousands of years.

    Where am I going with this? Well, today’s US, and Western Europe, are some of the most philo-Semitic countries in the history of the world. They bow down to the Holocaust narrative, imprison those who dissent from it, jail dissidents for 5 years for mocking Jewish MPs (Joshua Bonehill), hardly ever name the Jew, and Jews have a remarkable amount of political and media power (and financial success) relative to their small numbers. There’s precious little in the way of real life “anti-Semitism” to kvetch about. The Tribe might relax, and blend in.

    Solution? Import some more convincing “anti-Semitic” bogeymen to enhance ethnic cohesion. It’s working, isn’t it? Look at those French Jews making aliyah, hmm?

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    hmm?

    Maybe some Jews are in favor of open borders because they fall within a powerful and centuries old tradition of thinking in terms of the universal brotherhood of mankind, Jesus and Marx come to my mind.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. iffen says:
    @JamesForrestal
    There's another possible explanation for this phenomenon, that no one seems to have considered in this thread. For a people, a nation, to maintain their separate identity, genetics, and culture over a period of thousands of years, without a country, living as a minority in multiple different lands, is highly unusual. There are two major threats to such a group as the Jews. One is the direct physical threat of expulsion or destruction. The other is the more subtle threat of assimilation.

    If there is too much conflict between Jews and the host population, expulsion, eradication, or forced conversion (the cultural/ religious equivalent of eradication) are the major threats. If times are "too good," with Jews treated well, and little conflict with the hosts, then the larger threat is assimilation. How can this be prevented?

    The social construct of "anti-Semitism" is essential to Jewish survival as a separate tribe. It enhances ethnic cohesion, and works to stop assimilation. There is no parallel concept with respect to any other minority group that I am aware of. "Anti-gypsyism?" Nah. One could argue that the others are subsumed under the more general rubric of "racism" simply due to Jewish control of the narrative and Jewish supremacism/ self-importance, but I don't really think that adequately explains it. The idea that non-Jews commonly harbor a psychotic, irrational hatred for Jews qua Jews (as opposed to say, a generalized suspicion of, and dislike for, outsiders), for no reason at all, is a rather paranoid, deeply irrational concept that is just about unique to the Jewish people. Coincidentally (or not), the Jews have survived as a coherent group in the diaspora for thousands of years.

    Where am I going with this? Well, today's US, and Western Europe, are some of the most philo-Semitic countries in the history of the world. They bow down to the Holocaust narrative, imprison those who dissent from it, jail dissidents for 5 years for mocking Jewish MPs (Joshua Bonehill), hardly ever name the Jew, and Jews have a remarkable amount of political and media power (and financial success) relative to their small numbers. There's precious little in the way of real life "anti-Semitism" to kvetch about. The Tribe might relax, and blend in.

    Solution? Import some more convincing "anti-Semitic" bogeymen to enhance ethnic cohesion. It's working, isn't it? Look at those French Jews making aliyah, hmm?

    hmm?

    Maybe some Jews are in favor of open borders because they fall within a powerful and centuries old tradition of thinking in terms of the universal brotherhood of mankind, Jesus and Marx come to my mind.

    Read More
    • Troll: Jonathan Revusky
    • Replies: @geokat62

    Jesus and Marx come to my mind...
     
    The Frankfurt School comes to mine.
    , @JamesForrestal
    "Maybe some Jews are in favor of open borders because they fall within a powerful and centuries old tradition of thinking in terms of the universal brotherhood of mankind..."

    Don't you mean "the universal brotherhood of goyim?"

    Because it doesn't really seem as if they include themselves in any "universal brotherhood" with non-Jews. As the late Rabbi Ovadia Yosef propounded in 2010:
    “The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews. Why are the Gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why Gentiles were created.”

    Who was Yosef? A minor figure in Judaism? Hardly. He was the former Sephardi Chief Rabbi of Israel.

    His funeral in Jerusalem was the largest in Israel's history, with an estimated attendance of 850,000.

    When the Rabbi passed away, Benjamin Netanyahu unapologetically declared, “The Jewish people have lost one of the wisest men of this generation.”
    Shimon Peres added, “When I pressed his hand, I felt I was touching history, and when I kissed his head, it was as though I kissed the very greatness of Israel.”

    Go tikkun someone else's olam, bud. We don't want any.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. Markle says:

    SUNNIsemite, JEWISHsemite, SHIITTEsemite, they are kissing cousins.
    All are Zenophobic Tribalism …. held together by hatred of all NON-members.
    Sharia law is copied from Halacha law.
    Halal is copied from Kosher in slaughtering of animals in kosher and halal, Though the slaughtering is the same, Jews, who follow kosher, do not pronounce the name of God on each animal they slaughter. http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/difference-between-kosher-and-halal/#ixzz4QIwe7Mx2
    Muhammed lived among/with Jews and just rewrote/reworded their beliefs.
    Muslums deny the Divinty of Jesus. Jews Deny the EXISTENCE of Jesus and CURSE HIM.
    Islam is Judaism for DUMMIES.
    Islam is Judaism LITE.
    Orthodox islamists & Orthodox Jews ……. same TRIBAL based beliefs.
    What the Jewish Rabbis think of JESUS “As for Christianity, there is a dispute among Halachic authorities, but the vast majority consider it idolatry as well. Islam, on the other hand, is not considered idolatry.” Read that last bit again: “Islam, on the other hand, is not considered idolatry.”
    BOTH follow WAR gods ….. BOTH insist on total submission to their WAR god.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  123. Markle says:

    Send the muslims to Israel. Israel is the land of DIVERSITY, TOLERANCE, and INCLUSIVENESS. Thank the ADL,SPLC, ACLU,for INJECTING these foreign viruses into OUR society with their “tolerance, diversity, inclusion” aimed and designed to fracture and infect OUR White, Christian,Western, People. Even as they BRAG that they are creating a”PURE JEWISH” Israel.
    The SEMITES should all be together.

    Actually it is Turkey/Erdogan who dreams of a new Ottoman Empire, Israel grabbing land for “greater israel”, and America, the “MASTERBLASTER” from the movie “Thunderdome” a giant moron ridden on and directed by Twisted Jewish Dwarves ……..Who PROFITS? Who benefits by clearing enemy populations away from their borders so it can steal land for “greater israel” while genocidally flooding CHRISTianity at the same time.
    Israel does not have the NUMBERS to flood Europe so it uses the muslums as SHOCK TROOPS. What do the Jews think of JESUS? “As for Christianity, there is a dispute among Halachic authorities, but the vast majority consider it idolatry …. Islam, on the other hand, is not considered idolatry.” Read that last bit again: “Islam, on the other hand, is not considered idolatry.”
    http://12.onsocialengine.com/post/5682193/israeli-ngo-helping-migrant-boats-reach-europes-shores-instructs

    There is no way that millions just start migrating out of the Middle East into Europe because of a sudden impulse to do so, some very powerful supporting group is behind this and it simply is not clear what would be the motivation for such a massive invasion this mass movement of people across European borders IS genocide:
    http://news.antiwar.com/2016/06/21/israeli-intel-chief-we-dont-want-isis-defeated-in-syria/ http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/09/us-launches-open-war-on-syrian-government-forces.html

    http://www.salon.com/2016/08/23/israeli-think-tank-dont-destroy-isis-its-a-useful-tool-against-iran-hezbollah-syria/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialflow

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpnYpQaHAuc&feature=youtu.be — mass migration

    Who has the most desire to empty the Levant of Arabs and send them packing to Europe. You kill so many birds with that one stone it’s irresistible.

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/10/12/us-caught-faking-it-in-syria/

    http://thegoldenreport.net/a-biblical-storm-aimed-at-jerusalem/ here Jews are actively AIDDING the invaders.
    Who killed Christ and has HATED His followers for 2,000 years?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  124. geokat62 says:
    @iffen
    hmm?

    Maybe some Jews are in favor of open borders because they fall within a powerful and centuries old tradition of thinking in terms of the universal brotherhood of mankind, Jesus and Marx come to my mind.

    Jesus and Marx come to my mind…

    The Frankfurt School comes to mine.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    The Frankfurt School comes to mine.

    Perhaps, I actually haven't read much from them. My German language skills are non-existent.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. @iffen
    hmm?

    Maybe some Jews are in favor of open borders because they fall within a powerful and centuries old tradition of thinking in terms of the universal brotherhood of mankind, Jesus and Marx come to my mind.

    “Maybe some Jews are in favor of open borders because they fall within a powerful and centuries old tradition of thinking in terms of the universal brotherhood of mankind…”

    Don’t you mean “the universal brotherhood of goyim?”

    Because it doesn’t really seem as if they include themselves in any “universal brotherhood” with non-Jews. As the late Rabbi Ovadia Yosef propounded in 2010:
    “The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews. Why are the Gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why Gentiles were created.”

    Who was Yosef? A minor figure in Judaism? Hardly. He was the former Sephardi Chief Rabbi of Israel.

    His funeral in Jerusalem was the largest in Israel’s history, with an estimated attendance of 850,000.

    When the Rabbi passed away, Benjamin Netanyahu unapologetically declared, “The Jewish people have lost one of the wisest men of this generation.”
    Shimon Peres added, “When I pressed his hand, I felt I was touching history, and when I kissed his head, it was as though I kissed the very greatness of Israel.”

    Go tikkun someone else’s olam, bud. We don’t want any.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. iffen says:
    @geokat62

    Jesus and Marx come to my mind...
     
    The Frankfurt School comes to mine.

    The Frankfurt School comes to mine.

    Perhaps, I actually haven’t read much from them. My German language skills are non-existent.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    I actually haven’t read much from them. My German language skills are non-existent.
     
    Not to worry... they have written plenty in English. I'm currently reading Adorno's The Authoritarian Personality. In addition to the F-scale (which supposedly measures the extent to which someone has fascistic tendencies), he also introduced the A-S scale, which supposedly measures the extent to which Americans were deemed to be anti-Semitic. I believe the American Jewish Committee funded this work as part of a 5-volumes series called Studies in Prejudice.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. geokat62 says:
    @iffen
    The Frankfurt School comes to mine.

    Perhaps, I actually haven't read much from them. My German language skills are non-existent.

    I actually haven’t read much from them. My German language skills are non-existent.

    Not to worry… they have written plenty in English. I’m currently reading Adorno’s The Authoritarian Personality. In addition to the F-scale (which supposedly measures the extent to which someone has fascistic tendencies), he also introduced the A-S scale, which supposedly measures the extent to which Americans were deemed to be anti-Semitic. I believe the American Jewish Committee funded this work as part of a 5-volumes series called Studies in Prejudice.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Not to worry… they have written plenty in English. I’m currently reading

    Let us know if you find anything of value.

    As I understand it the most important of their goals was to figure out why the German working class and other working classes turned to Nazism instead of communism. Since the American working class just elected our own Hitler and there are possibilities that some European working classes might to do the same this year in Europe, this is a colossal failure on the part of the Frankfurt School. I take colossal failure as evidence that you don’t know what you are doing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. iffen says:
    @geokat62

    I actually haven’t read much from them. My German language skills are non-existent.
     
    Not to worry... they have written plenty in English. I'm currently reading Adorno's The Authoritarian Personality. In addition to the F-scale (which supposedly measures the extent to which someone has fascistic tendencies), he also introduced the A-S scale, which supposedly measures the extent to which Americans were deemed to be anti-Semitic. I believe the American Jewish Committee funded this work as part of a 5-volumes series called Studies in Prejudice.

    Not to worry… they have written plenty in English. I’m currently reading

    Let us know if you find anything of value.

    As I understand it the most important of their goals was to figure out why the German working class and other working classes turned to Nazism instead of communism. Since the American working class just elected our own Hitler and there are possibilities that some European working classes might to do the same this year in Europe, this is a colossal failure on the part of the Frankfurt School. I take colossal failure as evidence that you don’t know what you are doing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    I take colossal failure as evidence that you don’t know what you are doing.
     
    The FS produced most of their work between the 30s and 50s. Have you heard of the term, The New Left? Well, they are the ones who were responsible for the development of this movement. As you rightly pointed out, the FS was determined to understand why the various working classes in Europe turned to fascism instead of Bolshevism. There were two individuals who provided a very intriguing explanation as to why this happened. Their names are Antonio Gramsci and George Lukacs. They both independently put forth the same theory that Marx placed the emphasis on the wrong element of his base-superstructure duality. Rather than emphasizing the importance of the base (or the economy) in the class struggle, Gramsci and Lukacs emphasized the superstructure (or the culture) of civil society as the true battleground against the capitalist system. Gramsci coined this struggle as "The March Through Institutions" (political, media, religious, the family, and the media). In short, it was to be a struggle for cultural hegemony. Once the FS latched on to this brilliant insight, they began to write books that propagated these ideas.

    So, rather than being unsuccessful, as you suggest, these ideas (commonly referred to as Western or cultural Marxism or the New Left) were wildly successful as they spread through Western institutions, becoming the dominant ideology of the 60s and 70s. But since this is a dialectical process, for every trend that becomes the new thesis a new antithesis develops. We are now beginning to witness of the new antithesis to cultural Marxism. It first began in Europe in response to the developments that occurred during the May 1968 events in France. This counter movement, referred to as The New Right, formed an institution of their own, called GRECE. Its members described themselves as "Gramscians of the Right". A good reference for those interested in learning more about this movement is Michael O'Meara's New Culture, New Right: Anti-liberalism in Postmodern Europe.

    The New Right in Europe is what inspired the Alt-Right in America. Will these two reactions succeed in marching through the institutions of western societies in their battle against the dominant ideology of the The New Left? Only time will tell.

    P.S. Another, equally important goal for the FS was the elimination of antisemitism. To what extent these two goals overlapped in the minds of FS members, is an open question.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. geokat62 says:
    @iffen
    Not to worry… they have written plenty in English. I’m currently reading

    Let us know if you find anything of value.

    As I understand it the most important of their goals was to figure out why the German working class and other working classes turned to Nazism instead of communism. Since the American working class just elected our own Hitler and there are possibilities that some European working classes might to do the same this year in Europe, this is a colossal failure on the part of the Frankfurt School. I take colossal failure as evidence that you don’t know what you are doing.

    I take colossal failure as evidence that you don’t know what you are doing.

    The FS produced most of their work between the 30s and 50s. Have you heard of the term, The New Left? Well, they are the ones who were responsible for the development of this movement. As you rightly pointed out, the FS was determined to understand why the various working classes in Europe turned to fascism instead of Bolshevism. There were two individuals who provided a very intriguing explanation as to why this happened. Their names are Antonio Gramsci and George Lukacs. They both independently put forth the same theory that Marx placed the emphasis on the wrong element of his base-superstructure duality. Rather than emphasizing the importance of the base (or the economy) in the class struggle, Gramsci and Lukacs emphasized the superstructure (or the culture) of civil society as the true battleground against the capitalist system. Gramsci coined this struggle as “The March Through Institutions” (political, media, religious, the family, and the media). In short, it was to be a struggle for cultural hegemony. Once the FS latched on to this brilliant insight, they began to write books that propagated these ideas.

    So, rather than being unsuccessful, as you suggest, these ideas (commonly referred to as Western or cultural Marxism or the New Left) were wildly successful as they spread through Western institutions, becoming the dominant ideology of the 60s and 70s. But since this is a dialectical process, for every trend that becomes the new thesis a new antithesis develops. We are now beginning to witness of the new antithesis to cultural Marxism. It first began in Europe in response to the developments that occurred during the May 1968 events in France. This counter movement, referred to as The New Right, formed an institution of their own, called GRECE. Its members described themselves as “Gramscians of the Right”. A good reference for those interested in learning more about this movement is Michael O’Meara’s New Culture, New Right: Anti-liberalism in Postmodern Europe.

    The New Right in Europe is what inspired the Alt-Right in America. Will these two reactions succeed in marching through the institutions of western societies in their battle against the dominant ideology of the The New Left? Only time will tell.

    P.S. Another, equally important goal for the FS was the elimination of antisemitism. To what extent these two goals overlapped in the minds of FS members, is an open question.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    My view is that they were likely reasonably bright people, but they didn’t understand the problem. The problem wasn’t that the working class didn’t behave like it was “supposed” to; the problem was that the “scientific” model was defective. As an analogy, think of group of physicists that notice a problem with the behavior of an object with relation to their model of gravity. They decide work on what is “wrong” with their object and never consider the possibility that their theory of gravity is faulty.

    The amount of credit do the New Left for our present political, economic and social situation is open for debate. My opinion is that it has more to do with the lack of a coherent, organized, effective and virtuous opposition.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. Svigor says:

    Maybe some Jews are in favor of open borders because they fall within a powerful and centuries old tradition of thinking in terms of the universal brotherhood of mankind, Jesus and Marx come to my mind.

    Scheisse. Jesus staged a coup and stole Jews’ Chosenness (opposite of universal brotherhood of mankind) and gave it to all of mankind (precisely the universal brotherhood of mankind), and the Jews got him executed for it. And they’ve been hating him, and the fruits of his labors, ever since.

    It takes real chutzpah to produce a quote like that, and true ignorance to take it seriously.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    You mean you don't like it when Jews try to define/redefine Christianity for Christians? Jewsplainin' is a blast, and it doesn't stop with Christianity!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. iffen says:
    @geokat62

    I take colossal failure as evidence that you don’t know what you are doing.
     
    The FS produced most of their work between the 30s and 50s. Have you heard of the term, The New Left? Well, they are the ones who were responsible for the development of this movement. As you rightly pointed out, the FS was determined to understand why the various working classes in Europe turned to fascism instead of Bolshevism. There were two individuals who provided a very intriguing explanation as to why this happened. Their names are Antonio Gramsci and George Lukacs. They both independently put forth the same theory that Marx placed the emphasis on the wrong element of his base-superstructure duality. Rather than emphasizing the importance of the base (or the economy) in the class struggle, Gramsci and Lukacs emphasized the superstructure (or the culture) of civil society as the true battleground against the capitalist system. Gramsci coined this struggle as "The March Through Institutions" (political, media, religious, the family, and the media). In short, it was to be a struggle for cultural hegemony. Once the FS latched on to this brilliant insight, they began to write books that propagated these ideas.

    So, rather than being unsuccessful, as you suggest, these ideas (commonly referred to as Western or cultural Marxism or the New Left) were wildly successful as they spread through Western institutions, becoming the dominant ideology of the 60s and 70s. But since this is a dialectical process, for every trend that becomes the new thesis a new antithesis develops. We are now beginning to witness of the new antithesis to cultural Marxism. It first began in Europe in response to the developments that occurred during the May 1968 events in France. This counter movement, referred to as The New Right, formed an institution of their own, called GRECE. Its members described themselves as "Gramscians of the Right". A good reference for those interested in learning more about this movement is Michael O'Meara's New Culture, New Right: Anti-liberalism in Postmodern Europe.

    The New Right in Europe is what inspired the Alt-Right in America. Will these two reactions succeed in marching through the institutions of western societies in their battle against the dominant ideology of the The New Left? Only time will tell.

    P.S. Another, equally important goal for the FS was the elimination of antisemitism. To what extent these two goals overlapped in the minds of FS members, is an open question.

    My view is that they were likely reasonably bright people, but they didn’t understand the problem. The problem wasn’t that the working class didn’t behave like it was “supposed” to; the problem was that the “scientific” model was defective. As an analogy, think of group of physicists that notice a problem with the behavior of an object with relation to their model of gravity. They decide work on what is “wrong” with their object and never consider the possibility that their theory of gravity is faulty.

    The amount of credit do the New Left for our present political, economic and social situation is open for debate. My opinion is that it has more to do with the lack of a coherent, organized, effective and virtuous opposition.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    The amount of credit do the New Left for our present political, economic and social situation is open for debate.
     
    Not according to Pat Buchanan:

    "The United States has undergone a cultural, moral and religious revolution. A militant secularism has arisen in this country. It has always had a hold on the intellectual and academic elites, but in the 1960s it captured the young in the universities and the colleges.

    This is the basis of the great cultural war we're undergoing….We are two countries now. We are two countries morally, culturally, socially, and theologically. Cultural wars do not lend themselves to peaceful co-existence. One side prevails, or the other prevails.

    The truth is that while conservatives won the Cold War with political and economic Communism, we've lost the cultural war with cultural Marxism, which I think has prevailed pretty much in the United States. It is now the dominant culture. Whereas those of us who are traditionalists, we are, if you will, the counterculture."
     
    This quote is taken from the opening scenes of James Jaeger's film, Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America, a must see for every patriotic American.

    https://youtu.be/Ki6YUb1U77A

    Or if you prefer the written form, here is an article that summarizes the culture wars:

    Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America

    http://www.thedailybell.com/editorials/nelson-hultberg-cultural-marxism-the-corruption-of-america/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. @Svigor

    Maybe some Jews are in favor of open borders because they fall within a powerful and centuries old tradition of thinking in terms of the universal brotherhood of mankind, Jesus and Marx come to my mind.
     
    Scheisse. Jesus staged a coup and stole Jews' Chosenness (opposite of universal brotherhood of mankind) and gave it to all of mankind (precisely the universal brotherhood of mankind), and the Jews got him executed for it. And they've been hating him, and the fruits of his labors, ever since.

    It takes real chutzpah to produce a quote like that, and true ignorance to take it seriously.

    You mean you don’t like it when Jews try to define/redefine Christianity for Christians? Jewsplainin’ is a blast, and it doesn’t stop with Christianity!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. geokat62 says:
    @iffen
    My view is that they were likely reasonably bright people, but they didn’t understand the problem. The problem wasn’t that the working class didn’t behave like it was “supposed” to; the problem was that the “scientific” model was defective. As an analogy, think of group of physicists that notice a problem with the behavior of an object with relation to their model of gravity. They decide work on what is “wrong” with their object and never consider the possibility that their theory of gravity is faulty.

    The amount of credit do the New Left for our present political, economic and social situation is open for debate. My opinion is that it has more to do with the lack of a coherent, organized, effective and virtuous opposition.

    The amount of credit do the New Left for our present political, economic and social situation is open for debate.

    Not according to Pat Buchanan:

    “The United States has undergone a cultural, moral and religious revolution. A militant secularism has arisen in this country. It has always had a hold on the intellectual and academic elites, but in the 1960s it captured the young in the universities and the colleges.

    This is the basis of the great cultural war we’re undergoing….We are two countries now. We are two countries morally, culturally, socially, and theologically. Cultural wars do not lend themselves to peaceful co-existence. One side prevails, or the other prevails.

    The truth is that while conservatives won the Cold War with political and economic Communism, we’ve lost the cultural war with cultural Marxism, which I think has prevailed pretty much in the United States. It is now the dominant culture. Whereas those of us who are traditionalists, we are, if you will, the counterculture.”

    This quote is taken from the opening scenes of James Jaeger’s film, Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America, a must see for every patriotic American.

    Or if you prefer the written form, here is an article that summarizes the culture wars:

    Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America

    http://www.thedailybell.com/editorials/nelson-hultberg-cultural-marxism-the-corruption-of-america/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. Gabriel M says:
    @Svigor

    I think my “ignoramus theory” is that the majority American Jews believe in liberalism, in line with the great majority of Whites worldwide. Apparently, being confronted with the simple fact that the majority of Whites around the world despise you causes you to get angry and start rambling. I sympathise, but one has to learn to deal with these things.
     
    The overwhelming bulk of American Jews are phony leftists. They pose as leftists. But it's all a sham; they're just fine with right-wing-run, Apartheid Israel.

    You counter-argument is that most American Jews are pro-Israel so their liberalism can’t be sincere.

    1) All liberals are somewhat hypocritical about things that affect them personally.
     
    This one's way too big to just dismiss like that. Apartheid Israel is far and away the most oppressive "western" country. USA treats Israel better than Britian, France, or Germany, while Israel acts like Apartheid South Africa. And it's not really "personal" at all for the vast majority of American Jews, it's ethnic, racial - precisely the sort of thing that (white) leftists are supposed to be squared-away on (all of them except the Jews, apparently). This is not a mere peccadillo, this is a deal-breaker. It invalidates their leftism, shows it up for phony. It would be like White leftists giving the Nazis a pass.

    2)
     
    Adding numbers does not give your argument more weight.

    3) American Jews do not have significantly different views about Israel to Americans in general.
     
    Nonsense. Jews are much more informed about Israel. A great many Americans in general are not. Jews have a lot to do with that situation. And insofar as leftists are simpatico with American views on Israel (which are very right-wing), their leftism is phony as Hell, too.

    But yes, it is odd how 71% of Jews voted for Hillary, in stark contrast with American Whites, who broke strongly for Trump, yet, there's so much less daylight in between the two on Israel. Almost as if Jews' leftism was phony...

    4) Israel is really not anywhere near as right-wing as you imagine it to be and so the degree of hypocrisy is not as significant as you imagine.
     
    In other words, I'm not as right-wing as all of that. Because a White Israel would be good enough for me. Please tell your fellow tribesmen, who scream "HIIIITTTLLLEERRR!!!" every time anyone asks for a White Israel (because they're phony leftists).

    In other words, I’m not as right-wing as all of that. Because a White Israel would be good enough for me.

    Really? You want a country the size of New Jersey, with a 25% non-white population and an Arab on your supreme court? Honestly, I think you can do better, aim high man.

    But yes, it is odd how 71% of Jews voted for Hillary, in stark contrast with American Whites,

    And in absolute conformity to non-American Whites. (Actually, not quite, Europeans favoured Hillary almost as much as American blacks).

    This is not a mere peccadillo, this is a deal-breaker. It invalidates their leftism, shows it up for phony. It would be like White leftists giving the Nazis a pass.

    Except it’s not, because Israel is nothing like Nazi Germany. Essentially, you believe that for anyone to be honest they have to accept the most extreme Communist/Muslim caricature of Israel, which you have accepted solely because you are dishonest.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. Gabriel M says:
    @Talha
    Hey Gabriel,

    Very, very interesting stuff - thanks much for the link. It seems like, at least from a practical perspective, this has been basically disregarded for much of history - or at least the practical exemption for leaving to earn a living, makes it mostly a non-issue.

    Also interesting that it declares Egypt a no-go area, but that the Rabbi himself lived, taught and died in it due to practicing on the exemptions from the general rule.

    Peace.

    Note: The flow of the language and style of the text (not content) is very familiar to anyone who has read texts of Muslim jurists - that's pretty cool. :)

    The vast majority of Jews historical believed that they the Messiah would bring them back to Israel and that he would have semi-magic powers, so they did not need to actually do much. Rashi writes explicitly that the third temple will literally fall from the sky.

    Maimonides himself strongly rejected this view. He writes explicitly that the Messiah will not have any magic powers and strongly implies he will only come after mass Jewish re-settlement. He himself failed to return to Israel, but you can see him as initiating a slow increase in the Jewish population that eventually culminated in the Zionist movement. (Even the (in)famous Neteurei Karta are the descendants of those who traveled to Israel to fulfill the commandment to settle the land so as to bring about the Messianic age).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Gabriel,

    Thanks for more details on this topic; very interesting.

    He himself failed to return to Israel
     
    Well, I guess in a way he did - didn't they repatriate his body?

    I mean, from our perspective, you guys missed the boat on the Messiah (Son of Mary [pbuh]) but I always find it helpful to gather these details to understand peoples' motivations.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. @OilcanFloyd
    I'm not attacking you, Mr. Revusky. Mostly, I'm interested in your opinions.


    Possibly, but I doubt it. All that shit is fake too.

    Why would you say that the beheading of Rigby, or the other shootings that I mentioned, were faked? What about the attacks on tour buses/tourists in Egypt? That's happened several times over the last two or three decades. Do you think there are no extremists who would attack western targets? Do you think terrorists don't exist?

    Oh really? What specifically did you see? Where?

    There are places that I travel to where I have seen changes as more Muslims and immigrants have moved in. The hostility is definitely there. Do you not take seriously the claims of no-go areas in many European cities or a clash between cultures? There are areas in many American cities where it's wise not to go if you are not of the right ethnic or racial background, which usually means white. Why is it so far-fetched to believe that minorities and immigrants in Europe would also be similarly hostile or protective of their new-found turf?

    But that’s all a hoax too. All these mass sexual assaults in wide open public places, why is there no video of any of these things?

    Why is there no video? The videos I've seen of Koln that night just show chaos. I would guess that the men who attacked the women did so in large groups against vulnerable women, so there was no one who could get close enough to film, if anyone were there to do so. I don't know. Given the way that the mayor and police chief of Koln responded, I doubt that they would make footage from public cameras available to the press. If the U.S. authorities have it in their interests to hide the truth behind 9-11, the German authorities definitely have an interest in hiding the Koln attacks. The Swedish, Norwegian and other European governments also have an interest in downplaying the rape culture that has developed among their own migrants, minorities and immigrants. The violence and rape is a form of terrorism.

    It's interesting to me that so many people who are suspicious of 9-11, and many of the other suspicious acts that seem too outrageous to believe, are unwilling to believe that there are actual terrorists and people who sympathize with them. They are kind of like the people in the U.S. who deny that BLM actually killed/attacked the police because they hate white cops, and that there are people who support their actions, or people who deny that there could possibly be actual racial animosity behind interracial crime and rapes in the U.S. when whites are the victims. I don't know what your actual views are on those issues, but I know people who fit the mold.

    I’m not attacking you, Mr. Revusky.

    Well, I never said you were. I’m the one attacking you at this point. I see what a lying piece of shit you are and it’s time now to cut the pretenses.

    Mostly, I’m interested in your opinions.

    I doubt it. You just have your talking points you are here to put out.

    Oh really? What specifically did you see? Where?

    There are places that I travel to where I have seen changes as more Muslims and immigrants have moved in.

    Sorry, dude. You just exposed yourself as a liar. I ask you specifically where and it’s “There are places that I travel to” (WHERE?) and “I have seen changes…” (WHAT CHANGES?)

    No mention of even the continent where it was, much less the country or city???? What did you see? Where did you see it?

    You’re obviously a shill.

    The videos I’ve seen of Koln that night just show chaos. I would guess that the men who attacked the women did so in large groups against vulnerable women, so there was no one who could get close enough to film, if anyone were there to do so. I don’t know.

    As far as I can tell, the reason there is no video that shows anything remotely like what is claimed happened is quite simple: it didn’t happen. It’s a psy-op hoax.

    But anyway, to me it’s so utterly obvious that you are some kind of shill with a set of talking points that you are trying to put across here. A real participant, if he had traveled in whatever countries and observed whatever, if you asked him which countries, would name them. He wouldn’t just respond with “There are places that I travel to that…”. I can see this, but I can imagine that there are legitimate participants here who are so brainfucked that they are unable to see it. There are people here who are so stupid that they will come to your defense and say “Oh, why is that terrible Revusky guy attacking this legitimate participant Oilcan Floyd?”

    There are people on these various online forums who really are disinfo agents and I am pretty sure you are one of them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    "Well, I never said you were. I’m the one attacking you at this point. I see what a lying piece of shit you are and it’s time now to cut the pretenses."

    Eaxctly what did I lie about? Outside of not giving you direct personal anecdotes and revealing where I travel for fun, I'm not sure what the issue is, since my personal anecdotes would likely be called trivial, anway.

    If you have to know, I have seen major changes in small and large towns across Scandinavia and Europe due to immigration. Are you denying the problems that immigration has brought about? No-go zones, violence, rioting, rapes, etc.? Is that all just psy-ops and lies? I don't buy 9-11 as presented, but I understand culture-clash, immigration as warfare and small-scale blowback. Those things are real.

    "You’re obviously a shill."

    Since you like specifics, can you tell me exactly who I am shilling for? This should be fun. Whose talking points am I putting out?

    "As far as I can tell, the reason there is no video that shows anything remotely like what is claimed happened is quite simple: it didn’t happen. It’s a psy-op hoax.

    But you don't know that, and the German federal and local Koln governments have every reason to downplay or hide what happened, which would be far easier to do than rigging 9-11 and covering it up. Not many people film themselves raping or assaulting other people, and about as many bystanders stand around to document serious assaults. Chances are that the victims were singled out because they were vulnerable and alone, which would mean that only the gangs were around to film, and that didn't happen. Does that mean there were no rapes or assaults? Rape by immigrants is an issue across Europe, and I believe that it is as deliberate as much of the interracial rape in the U.S.

    From what I've read about the situation in Koln, the local police were overwhelmed. Are those reports also lies?

    I'll give you a personal anecdote: I have visited the town of Norrkoping in Sweden many times over the last 25 or so years. When I first visited, whatever immigrants there were, were not very visible, and they were very polite. Not so today. My recent experience is that they clearly don't want you in their businesses or neighborhoods. Apparently, the local Swedes agree, since flight from the city has engulfed the local countryside around Lake Glan. The same thing happens just about everywhere pockets or waves of immigrants settle. Stockholm has issues, and the same is true for Oslo, Helsinki, London, Paris and many large and small towns in Europe. Is that all psy-op and shilling?

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/17/huge-increase-attacks-swedish-police/

    Is that good enough for you?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. Talha says:
    @Gabriel M
    The vast majority of Jews historical believed that they the Messiah would bring them back to Israel and that he would have semi-magic powers, so they did not need to actually do much. Rashi writes explicitly that the third temple will literally fall from the sky.

    Maimonides himself strongly rejected this view. He writes explicitly that the Messiah will not have any magic powers and strongly implies he will only come after mass Jewish re-settlement. He himself failed to return to Israel, but you can see him as initiating a slow increase in the Jewish population that eventually culminated in the Zionist movement. (Even the (in)famous Neteurei Karta are the descendants of those who traveled to Israel to fulfill the commandment to settle the land so as to bring about the Messianic age).

    Hey Gabriel,

    Thanks for more details on this topic; very interesting.

    He himself failed to return to Israel

    Well, I guess in a way he did – didn’t they repatriate his body?

    I mean, from our perspective, you guys missed the boat on the Messiah (Son of Mary [pbuh]) but I always find it helpful to gather these details to understand peoples’ motivations.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gabriel M
    My turn for a question.

    There's a common practice in Jewish circles of not cutting a boy's hair until he is three year's old. There is no Biblical, Mishnaic or Talmudic source for such a practice, nor do any of the medieval legal authorities mention it. Worst of all, it seems to derive from a pagan practice designed to shield male infants from vengeful female demons. Nevertheless, it was strongly championed by followers of Lurianic Kabbalah and is now (to my chagrin) the majority practice among orthodox Jews.

    Anyway, my wife and I periodically see Arabs in Jerusalem walking around with boys with long hair that looks very much like it has never been cut. I doubt they picked this up from Jews, so I was wondering if any such practice exists in Islam.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. @Jonathan Revusky

    I’m not attacking you, Mr. Revusky.
     
    Well, I never said you were. I'm the one attacking you at this point. I see what a lying piece of shit you are and it's time now to cut the pretenses.

    Mostly, I’m interested in your opinions.
     
    I doubt it. You just have your talking points you are here to put out.


    Oh really? What specifically did you see? Where?
     
    There are places that I travel to where I have seen changes as more Muslims and immigrants have moved in.
     
    Sorry, dude. You just exposed yourself as a liar. I ask you specifically where and it's "There are places that I travel to" (WHERE?) and "I have seen changes..." (WHAT CHANGES?)

    No mention of even the continent where it was, much less the country or city???? What did you see? Where did you see it?

    You're obviously a shill.


    The videos I’ve seen of Koln that night just show chaos. I would guess that the men who attacked the women did so in large groups against vulnerable women, so there was no one who could get close enough to film, if anyone were there to do so. I don’t know.
     
    As far as I can tell, the reason there is no video that shows anything remotely like what is claimed happened is quite simple: it didn't happen. It's a psy-op hoax.

    But anyway, to me it's so utterly obvious that you are some kind of shill with a set of talking points that you are trying to put across here. A real participant, if he had traveled in whatever countries and observed whatever, if you asked him which countries, would name them. He wouldn't just respond with "There are places that I travel to that...". I can see this, but I can imagine that there are legitimate participants here who are so brainfucked that they are unable to see it. There are people here who are so stupid that they will come to your defense and say "Oh, why is that terrible Revusky guy attacking this legitimate participant Oilcan Floyd?"

    There are people on these various online forums who really are disinfo agents and I am pretty sure you are one of them.

    Well, I never said you were. I’m the one attacking you at this point. I see what a lying piece of shit you are and it’s time now to cut the pretenses.

    Eaxctly what did I lie about? Outside of not giving you direct personal anecdotes and revealing where I travel for fun, I’m not sure what the issue is, since my personal anecdotes would likely be called trivial, anway.

    If you have to know, I have seen major changes in small and large towns across Scandinavia and Europe due to immigration. Are you denying the problems that immigration has brought about? No-go zones, violence, rioting, rapes, etc.? Is that all just psy-ops and lies? I don’t buy 9-11 as presented, but I understand culture-clash, immigration as warfare and small-scale blowback. Those things are real.

    You’re obviously a shill.

    Since you like specifics, can you tell me exactly who I am shilling for? This should be fun. Whose talking points am I putting out?

    As far as I can tell, the reason there is no video that shows anything remotely like what is claimed happened is quite simple: it didn’t happen. It’s a psy-op hoax.

    But you don’t know that, and the German federal and local Koln governments have every reason to downplay or hide what happened, which would be far easier to do than rigging 9-11 and covering it up. Not many people film themselves raping or assaulting other people, and about as many bystanders stand around to document serious assaults. Chances are that the victims were singled out because they were vulnerable and alone, which would mean that only the gangs were around to film, and that didn’t happen. Does that mean there were no rapes or assaults? Rape by immigrants is an issue across Europe, and I believe that it is as deliberate as much of the interracial rape in the U.S.

    From what I’ve read about the situation in Koln, the local police were overwhelmed. Are those reports also lies?

    I’ll give you a personal anecdote: I have visited the town of Norrkoping in Sweden many times over the last 25 or so years. When I first visited, whatever immigrants there were, were not very visible, and they were very polite. Not so today. My recent experience is that they clearly don’t want you in their businesses or neighborhoods. Apparently, the local Swedes agree, since flight from the city has engulfed the local countryside around Lake Glan. The same thing happens just about everywhere pockets or waves of immigrants settle. Stockholm has issues, and the same is true for Oslo, Helsinki, London, Paris and many large and small towns in Europe. Is that all psy-op and shilling?

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/17/huge-increase-attacks-swedish-police/

    Is that good enough for you?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    Eaxctly what did I lie about?
     
    You claimed that you traveled to various places (without specifying any of them even approximately) and that you saw various things (without specifying what they were.)

    I asked you to specify and you refused, because you were lying. Everybody with a grain of sense should be able to see that.


    Outside of not giving you direct personal anecdotes and revealing where I travel for fun, I’m not sure what the issue is, since my personal anecdotes would likely be called trivial, anway.
     
    Well, you were the one talking about your alleged "personal travel experiences" as part of your argument. I asked you where they were specifically, I mean, like even the country, even the continent, and you refuse to say where. You were obviously lying. I have a sixth sense for this.

    If you have to know, I have seen major changes in small and large towns across Scandinavia and Europe due to immigration.
     
    I very much doubt you have even been to any Scandinavian country. Again, if you really had been to any Scandinavian country, you'd mention the country or countries by name. I recognize when somebody is lying in these kinds of spots because they're always trying to be maximally generalist because it's understood that if you start getting precise, you'll end up getting tied up in your own contradictions. Or at the very least, if your lies get very precise, you need a very good memory to keep your lies straight.

    I know you're lying. I have a sixth sense for this kind of thing. In any case, it's obvious.

    I don’t buy 9-11 as presented, but...
     
    Hmm, I see that this is the new Zio shill line. This is a gambit so that people won't think you're a zio shill. They do seem to have modified the playbook a little, eh...


    Since you like specifics, can you tell me exactly who I am shilling for? This should be fun. Whose talking points am I putting out?
     
    Well, obviously, you know exactly who you are shilling for. Why would you need to ask me? LOL.

    But, the answer is pretty obvious. It's the same faction that is behind all the Islamophobia campaign, like the Gatestone Institute and the Pamela Geller stuff and all of it. And everybody knows who is behind it. It's a Zionist thing. It's a certain faction of Zionist politics. They want the Goyim to hate Arabs as much as they do.


    From what I’ve read about the situation in Koln, the local police were overwhelmed. Are those reports also lies?
     
    As far as I can tell, nothing significant really happened. So, to answer your question, it's all a bunch of lies basically.


    I’ll give you a personal anecdote: I have visited the town of Norrkoping in Sweden many times over the last 25 or so years.
     
    I do not believe you have ever been to Norrkoping, Sweden. If I had to bet, I would bet that you are probably a pimply faced kid who was not even alive 25 years ago.

    I don't believe anything you say, but maybe some people do believe you. So for them, I will pose the question; What first brought you to Norrkoping, Sweden some 25 years ago and why did you return there so many times since then?

    As for breitbart.com, I do not trust that as a news source.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. Gabriel M says:
    @Talha
    Hey Gabriel,

    Thanks for more details on this topic; very interesting.

    He himself failed to return to Israel
     
    Well, I guess in a way he did - didn't they repatriate his body?

    I mean, from our perspective, you guys missed the boat on the Messiah (Son of Mary [pbuh]) but I always find it helpful to gather these details to understand peoples' motivations.

    Peace.

    My turn for a question.

    There’s a common practice in Jewish circles of not cutting a boy’s hair until he is three year’s old. There is no Biblical, Mishnaic or Talmudic source for such a practice, nor do any of the medieval legal authorities mention it. Worst of all, it seems to derive from a pagan practice designed to shield male infants from vengeful female demons. Nevertheless, it was strongly championed by followers of Lurianic Kabbalah and is now (to my chagrin) the majority practice among orthodox Jews.

    Anyway, my wife and I periodically see Arabs in Jerusalem walking around with boys with long hair that looks very much like it has never been cut. I doubt they picked this up from Jews, so I was wondering if any such practice exists in Islam.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey Gabriel,

    Nevertheless, it was strongly championed by followers of Lurianic Kabbalah and is now (to my chagrin) the majority practice among orthodox Jews.
     
    LOL! I had no clue you guys had a concept of bid'ah.

    The only practice dealing with hair on a child that I am aware of is that you shave a new born's head (when it is healthy and safe to do so - seventh day is best) and give the equivalent weight (to the hair) in gold or silver to charity.

    Other than that, I am not aware of any other practice. Now, being a father of three boys myself - I know they can be very fickle about getting haircuts when they are very young so maybe part of it stems from people just not wanting to deal with the madness. My youngest had a head of long curly hair for a very long time before his first haircut - but not the other two.

    The Sunnah for length of hair (for males) is to have it anywhere between the bottom of the ear down to the shoulder - but that is irrespective of age.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. Talha says:
    @Gabriel M
    My turn for a question.

    There's a common practice in Jewish circles of not cutting a boy's hair until he is three year's old. There is no Biblical, Mishnaic or Talmudic source for such a practice, nor do any of the medieval legal authorities mention it. Worst of all, it seems to derive from a pagan practice designed to shield male infants from vengeful female demons. Nevertheless, it was strongly championed by followers of Lurianic Kabbalah and is now (to my chagrin) the majority practice among orthodox Jews.

    Anyway, my wife and I periodically see Arabs in Jerusalem walking around with boys with long hair that looks very much like it has never been cut. I doubt they picked this up from Jews, so I was wondering if any such practice exists in Islam.

    Hey Gabriel,

    Nevertheless, it was strongly championed by followers of Lurianic Kabbalah and is now (to my chagrin) the majority practice among orthodox Jews.

    LOL! I had no clue you guys had a concept of bid’ah.

    The only practice dealing with hair on a child that I am aware of is that you shave a new born’s head (when it is healthy and safe to do so – seventh day is best) and give the equivalent weight (to the hair) in gold or silver to charity.

    Other than that, I am not aware of any other practice. Now, being a father of three boys myself – I know they can be very fickle about getting haircuts when they are very young so maybe part of it stems from people just not wanting to deal with the madness. My youngest had a head of long curly hair for a very long time before his first haircut – but not the other two.

    The Sunnah for length of hair (for males) is to have it anywhere between the bottom of the ear down to the shoulder – but that is irrespective of age.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. @OilcanFloyd
    "Well, I never said you were. I’m the one attacking you at this point. I see what a lying piece of shit you are and it’s time now to cut the pretenses."

    Eaxctly what did I lie about? Outside of not giving you direct personal anecdotes and revealing where I travel for fun, I'm not sure what the issue is, since my personal anecdotes would likely be called trivial, anway.

    If you have to know, I have seen major changes in small and large towns across Scandinavia and Europe due to immigration. Are you denying the problems that immigration has brought about? No-go zones, violence, rioting, rapes, etc.? Is that all just psy-ops and lies? I don't buy 9-11 as presented, but I understand culture-clash, immigration as warfare and small-scale blowback. Those things are real.

    "You’re obviously a shill."

    Since you like specifics, can you tell me exactly who I am shilling for? This should be fun. Whose talking points am I putting out?

    "As far as I can tell, the reason there is no video that shows anything remotely like what is claimed happened is quite simple: it didn’t happen. It’s a psy-op hoax.

    But you don't know that, and the German federal and local Koln governments have every reason to downplay or hide what happened, which would be far easier to do than rigging 9-11 and covering it up. Not many people film themselves raping or assaulting other people, and about as many bystanders stand around to document serious assaults. Chances are that the victims were singled out because they were vulnerable and alone, which would mean that only the gangs were around to film, and that didn't happen. Does that mean there were no rapes or assaults? Rape by immigrants is an issue across Europe, and I believe that it is as deliberate as much of the interracial rape in the U.S.

    From what I've read about the situation in Koln, the local police were overwhelmed. Are those reports also lies?

    I'll give you a personal anecdote: I have visited the town of Norrkoping in Sweden many times over the last 25 or so years. When I first visited, whatever immigrants there were, were not very visible, and they were very polite. Not so today. My recent experience is that they clearly don't want you in their businesses or neighborhoods. Apparently, the local Swedes agree, since flight from the city has engulfed the local countryside around Lake Glan. The same thing happens just about everywhere pockets or waves of immigrants settle. Stockholm has issues, and the same is true for Oslo, Helsinki, London, Paris and many large and small towns in Europe. Is that all psy-op and shilling?

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/17/huge-increase-attacks-swedish-police/

    Is that good enough for you?

    Eaxctly what did I lie about?

    You claimed that you traveled to various places (without specifying any of them even approximately) and that you saw various things (without specifying what they were.)

    I asked you to specify and you refused, because you were lying. Everybody with a grain of sense should be able to see that.

    Outside of not giving you direct personal anecdotes and revealing where I travel for fun, I’m not sure what the issue is, since my personal anecdotes would likely be called trivial, anway.

    Well, you were the one talking about your alleged “personal travel experiences” as part of your argument. I asked you where they were specifically, I mean, like even the country, even the continent, and you refuse to say where. You were obviously lying. I have a sixth sense for this.

    If you have to know, I have seen major changes in small and large towns across Scandinavia and Europe due to immigration.

    I very much doubt you have even been to any Scandinavian country. Again, if you really had been to any Scandinavian country, you’d mention the country or countries by name. I recognize when somebody is lying in these kinds of spots because they’re always trying to be maximally generalist because it’s understood that if you start getting precise, you’ll end up getting tied up in your own contradictions. Or at the very least, if your lies get very precise, you need a very good memory to keep your lies straight.

    I know you’re lying. I have a sixth sense for this kind of thing. In any case, it’s obvious.

    I don’t buy 9-11 as presented, but…

    Hmm, I see that this is the new Zio shill line. This is a gambit so that people won’t think you’re a zio shill. They do seem to have modified the playbook a little, eh…

    Since you like specifics, can you tell me exactly who I am shilling for? This should be fun. Whose talking points am I putting out?

    Well, obviously, you know exactly who you are shilling for. Why would you need to ask me? LOL.

    But, the answer is pretty obvious. It’s the same faction that is behind all the Islamophobia campaign, like the Gatestone Institute and the Pamela Geller stuff and all of it. And everybody knows who is behind it. It’s a Zionist thing. It’s a certain faction of Zionist politics. They want the Goyim to hate Arabs as much as they do.

    From what I’ve read about the situation in Koln, the local police were overwhelmed. Are those reports also lies?

    As far as I can tell, nothing significant really happened. So, to answer your question, it’s all a bunch of lies basically.

    I’ll give you a personal anecdote: I have visited the town of Norrkoping in Sweden many times over the last 25 or so years.

    I do not believe you have ever been to Norrkoping, Sweden. If I had to bet, I would bet that you are probably a pimply faced kid who was not even alive 25 years ago.

    I don’t believe anything you say, but maybe some people do believe you. So for them, I will pose the question; What first brought you to Norrkoping, Sweden some 25 years ago and why did you return there so many times since then?

    As for breitbart.com, I do not trust that as a news source.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. You need a new sixth sense. And not giving personal anecdotes is not lying. I was actually right in knowing that my own anecdotes would be dismissed. What I didn’t expect was that you would deny them completely.

    I’m not a liar, shill, agent or zionist. I’m none of those things, and I’m especially not any sort of zionist. I may have mistakenly pegged a poster as a hasbarist before, but you are especially bad!

    And what difference does it make why I went to Norrkoping originally, or why I’ve visited afterwards? I could discuss the town and the surrounding villages that I’m familiar with, but why? Either you understand what’s going on, or you don’t.

    And who cares what you think of Breitbart? I have my issues with Breitbart, but the article I posted is likely accurate. Besides, it mostly quoted Swedish police and officials. Are they lying, also?

    My original interest in your opinions was that so many people who suspect the truth of 9-11 also deny the obvious about immigration and the possibility of culture-clash, terrorism, blowback or immigration used to wage war. I don’t understand those people. I’d rather have Islam and Judaism/zionism bottled up in the ME, and out of the West.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
    Mo

    You need a new sixth sense.
     
    I don't think so. You need to improve your lying skills.

    And what difference does it make why I went to Norrkoping originally, or why I’ve visited afterwards? I could discuss the town and the surrounding villages that I’m familiar with, but why?
     
    No you couldn't. At least not without making up a bunch of bullshit.

    Because you've never been to any of those places.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. @OilcanFloyd
    You need a new sixth sense. And not giving personal anecdotes is not lying. I was actually right in knowing that my own anecdotes would be dismissed. What I didn't expect was that you would deny them completely.

    I'm not a liar, shill, agent or zionist. I'm none of those things, and I'm especially not any sort of zionist. I may have mistakenly pegged a poster as a hasbarist before, but you are especially bad!

    And what difference does it make why I went to Norrkoping originally, or why I've visited afterwards? I could discuss the town and the surrounding villages that I'm familiar with, but why? Either you understand what's going on, or you don't.

    And who cares what you think of Breitbart? I have my issues with Breitbart, but the article I posted is likely accurate. Besides, it mostly quoted Swedish police and officials. Are they lying, also?

    My original interest in your opinions was that so many people who suspect the truth of 9-11 also deny the obvious about immigration and the possibility of culture-clash, terrorism, blowback or immigration used to wage war. I don't understand those people. I'd rather have Islam and Judaism/zionism bottled up in the ME, and out of the West.

    Mo

    You need a new sixth sense.

    I don’t think so. You need to improve your lying skills.

    And what difference does it make why I went to Norrkoping originally, or why I’ve visited afterwards? I could discuss the town and the surrounding villages that I’m familiar with, but why?

    No you couldn’t. At least not without making up a bunch of bullshit.

    Because you’ve never been to any of those places.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    I guess your reply means that you believe that there is no culture clash or blowback at any level? That was what you were really trying to avoid answering.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. Suit yourself.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  145. anarchyst says:
    @joe webb
    I am unable to perceive a conclusion here. The jews need to be able leave any country. OK. Whites are a far greater danger to Jews than a few muslims.ok White guilt can be tapped and it is good to keep whites feeling guilty, especially about jews. OK. Lawrence Auster says that exclusion policies could be used against jews. OK. Curbs on free speech is a jewish goal and curbing anti muslim speech by whites is good for the Jews, since it can be used to keep hostile White sentiment toward jews under control as well. OK.

    1."As a result, the consensus view among Jews seems to be that the transformation of the West is manageable." 2. yet, that Muslim votes here in the US could become a dangerous factor. 3. that the Dem Party is about split now on Israel. 3. Jews are worried. OK.

    The fundamental question , per the title, is why jews support muslim immigration. I don't think you have completely covered it.

    First, America, the most Protestant Nation of all Protestant Nations, and the only one that takes its religion seriously, in NEVER going to abandon the holy jews. That can be seen at every level of social and political and media reality, especially Fox News. Trump could be a joker, but I doubt it.

    Second, the chances of large muslim voting is nearly nil. When T. and the American populace, not the liberals, get done with it, the muzzies will be lucky if they can stay, let alone vote. However , again, Protestantism and even the Catholics now, luv the jews. It may be that only casual religious folks and the non-religious will really get straight with the jews. That does not mean that the Jewish Wars cannot be stopped. Trump has got himself in the hard place/rock place with his words so far re Israel and Isis, and so on.

    Third, like you said right off the bat, jews hate whites far far more than muzzies...in the US of course. The old Divide and Conquer strategy, taking up the Negroes as a holy Oppressed people and getting us Whites to fight over it, that is fundamental to jewish strategies here. Same thing can apply to muzzies, but will likely Not be at all successful, except for jewyorktimes and hollywood.

    Therefore, jews are stuck with their race equality song and dance, despite the obvious hypocrisy with regard to the Judenstaat. This is overlooked by Whites because of holocaust stories and religion. Jews get to be the great exception to consistency in the immigration wars. God wants them to be exempt from criticism of any type. but nothing lasts forever.

    So it remains Divide Whites and Conquer them. Nevertheless, anti-Jew feeling is mounting and all these jewish shenanigans are eroding their privileged place
    in the White psyche, especially among young folks and Dem Party anti-zionist folks.

    As Thomas Mann put it in Dr. Faustus (I think it was) "you jews are soon to be in real jewish
    trouble.'

    Joe Webb

    There is much more to the story…when one understands the “roots” of Islam and comes to the realization that Islam is an Arabicized form of Judaism.
    The Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran have virtually identical passages that promote each “cult’s” form of supremacy and hostility toward outsiders–those not of each respective “faith”. The Talmud regards gentiles as livestock, to be used for the advantage of the Jew.
    One could safely argue that Judaism is practiced by Sephardic Jews and Islam is practiced by Arabic Moslems, hence the lack of real hostility between Jews and Moslems.
    When one understands this,the realization is that Judaism and Islam are closely related and each cult promotes its particular brand of “supremacism”.
    The “snag” in the ointment is the Ashkenazic Jews, who hail from Eastern Europe, and have less “baggage”, but more hostility when it comes to Judeo-Islamic affairs. Being the inventors and promoters of communism, the Ashkenazics are more atheistic and utilize Judaism more as a social organization than a religious or cultural belief system. Ashkenazic Jews show much more hostility to Arabs, Whites and other “outsiders” than Sephardic Jews…
    Both the Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran proscribe harsh punishments for transgressions against their respective believers and minimize the punishments for transgressions committed by believers against “outsiders”…
    One difference between Judaism and Islam is the treatment of Jesus Christ and his mother Mary.
    The Jewish Talmud states that Jesus Christ is boiling in hot excrement for eternity while his mother Mary is considered to be a harlot who consorted with a Roman soldier to birth Christ.
    The Islamic Koran regards Jesus Christ as a prophet–not the “Son of God”, but a respected prophet, nevertheless. Mary is specifically mentioned in the Koran and is given a place of high honor.
    Now, which “faith” is more hostile to Christianity?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. imbroglio says:

    The Jews have long been Prof. MacDonald’s dybbuk and so he overlooks what he would presumably take to be the real threat to the body politic posed by American Jews: intermarriage, interbreeding, assimilation and disappearance at what an anti-semite might take to be an alarming clip. Run of the mill American Jews, under the age of forty, have by and large become so Americanized that their Jewish identity means little to them, a vestige of a past they don’t know or care much about unless and until they find themselves singled out for opprobrium.

    The last thing Prof. MacDonald would appear to want is the peaceful disappearance of the Jews into the much larger body of whatever constitutes the white race. If he has the courage of his convictions, he’ll call for the instititution of Nuremburg-type laws and policies to keep the Jews just where he wants them: the betes noir of his racial mania.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    Run of the mill American Jews, under the age of forty, have by and large become so Americanized that their Jewish identity means little to them, a vestige of a past they don’t know or care much about unless and until they find themselves singled out for opprobrium.

    I don't buy that at all. Jews of all ages tend to vote and act like the stereotypical Jewish SJW. I rarely see Jews who truly identify with traditional America. When Jews talk of assimilation, it just means that that they accept popular culture, which is largely inspired by Jews. How many Jews would like to go back to pre-1965 America? Not many.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. anarchyst says:
    @Ole Alesund
    Jewish groups are all for bringing in large numbers of Muslims refugees into western countries, because it is good for further consolidation of Jewish power. Multiculturalism dilutes the cohesiveness of white people and in democratic societies, makes it easier for jews to control the country by forming human rights organizations and ethnic advocacy organizations and acting as lawyers and middlemen between these groups and government. Jews lobby for hate laws and special monies being set aside for ethnic community centers, while denying such monies for White ethnic groups. Professor McDonald is right that Jews use their historical memory of being denied as refugees (the right to come to such places as the United States and Canada in WW2) as a pretext to support their present day support of Muslim refugees. However, it is not out of humanitarianism that they do it. They do it because it is good for Jewish interests, no other interests exist as far as they are concerned.

    It should be noted that Islam is a form of “arabicized judaism”. Many of the “rules” in the jewish Talmud are virtually identical to the “rules” in the Koran. Both belief system operate with an air of supremacy of each respective “system”–relegating “outsiders” to inferior status, with special “taxes” levied by each respective system, as well as the supremacists in each group being immune from the equivalent of “justice” when wrongdoing is done to the “outsiders”… Having read both the Talmud and Koran, I have come to the above conclusion…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. @imbroglio
    The Jews have long been Prof. MacDonald's dybbuk and so he overlooks what he would presumably take to be the real threat to the body politic posed by American Jews: intermarriage, interbreeding, assimilation and disappearance at what an anti-semite might take to be an alarming clip. Run of the mill American Jews, under the age of forty, have by and large become so Americanized that their Jewish identity means little to them, a vestige of a past they don't know or care much about unless and until they find themselves singled out for opprobrium.

    The last thing Prof. MacDonald would appear to want is the peaceful disappearance of the Jews into the much larger body of whatever constitutes the white race. If he has the courage of his convictions, he'll call for the instititution of Nuremburg-type laws and policies to keep the Jews just where he wants them: the betes noir of his racial mania.

    Run of the mill American Jews, under the age of forty, have by and large become so Americanized that their Jewish identity means little to them, a vestige of a past they don’t know or care much about unless and until they find themselves singled out for opprobrium.

    I don’t buy that at all. Jews of all ages tend to vote and act like the stereotypical Jewish SJW. I rarely see Jews who truly identify with traditional America. When Jews talk of assimilation, it just means that that they accept popular culture, which is largely inspired by Jews. How many Jews would like to go back to pre-1965 America? Not many.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. @Jonathan Revusky
    Mo

    You need a new sixth sense.
     
    I don't think so. You need to improve your lying skills.

    And what difference does it make why I went to Norrkoping originally, or why I’ve visited afterwards? I could discuss the town and the surrounding villages that I’m familiar with, but why?
     
    No you couldn't. At least not without making up a bunch of bullshit.

    Because you've never been to any of those places.

    I guess your reply means that you believe that there is no culture clash or blowback at any level? That was what you were really trying to avoid answering.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  151. […] MacDonald wrote a thoughtful piece trying to unravel the mystery, Why Do Jewish Organizations Want Anti-Israel Refugees? and […]

    Read More
  152. I’m pissed at my former land lord, he never returned my rental deposit he also happens to be Jewish. Does that make me anti-semite?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  153. […] MacDonald wrote a thoughtful piece trying to unravel the mystery, Why Do Jewish Organizations Want Anti-Israel Refugees? and published […]

    Read More
  154. […] MacDonald wrote a thoughtful piece trying to unravel the mystery, Why Do Jewish Organizations Want Anti-Israel Refugees? and published […]

    Read More
  155. […] MacDonald ha scritto un pezzo in cui fa una riflessione per cercare di svelare questo mistero, per quale motivo  delle […]

    Read More
  156. gustafus says:
    @joe webb
    I am unable to perceive a conclusion here. The jews need to be able leave any country. OK. Whites are a far greater danger to Jews than a few muslims.ok White guilt can be tapped and it is good to keep whites feeling guilty, especially about jews. OK. Lawrence Auster says that exclusion policies could be used against jews. OK. Curbs on free speech is a jewish goal and curbing anti muslim speech by whites is good for the Jews, since it can be used to keep hostile White sentiment toward jews under control as well. OK.

    1."As a result, the consensus view among Jews seems to be that the transformation of the West is manageable." 2. yet, that Muslim votes here in the US could become a dangerous factor. 3. that the Dem Party is about split now on Israel. 3. Jews are worried. OK.

    The fundamental question , per the title, is why jews support muslim immigration. I don't think you have completely covered it.

    First, America, the most Protestant Nation of all Protestant Nations, and the only one that takes its religion seriously, in NEVER going to abandon the holy jews. That can be seen at every level of social and political and media reality, especially Fox News. Trump could be a joker, but I doubt it.

    Second, the chances of large muslim voting is nearly nil. When T. and the American populace, not the liberals, get done with it, the muzzies will be lucky if they can stay, let alone vote. However , again, Protestantism and even the Catholics now, luv the jews. It may be that only casual religious folks and the non-religious will really get straight with the jews. That does not mean that the Jewish Wars cannot be stopped. Trump has got himself in the hard place/rock place with his words so far re Israel and Isis, and so on.

    Third, like you said right off the bat, jews hate whites far far more than muzzies...in the US of course. The old Divide and Conquer strategy, taking up the Negroes as a holy Oppressed people and getting us Whites to fight over it, that is fundamental to jewish strategies here. Same thing can apply to muzzies, but will likely Not be at all successful, except for jewyorktimes and hollywood.

    Therefore, jews are stuck with their race equality song and dance, despite the obvious hypocrisy with regard to the Judenstaat. This is overlooked by Whites because of holocaust stories and religion. Jews get to be the great exception to consistency in the immigration wars. God wants them to be exempt from criticism of any type. but nothing lasts forever.

    So it remains Divide Whites and Conquer them. Nevertheless, anti-Jew feeling is mounting and all these jewish shenanigans are eroding their privileged place
    in the White psyche, especially among young folks and Dem Party anti-zionist folks.

    As Thomas Mann put it in Dr. Faustus (I think it was) "you jews are soon to be in real jewish
    trouble.'

    Joe Webb

    As Thomas Mann put it in Dr. Faustus (I think it was) “you jews are soon to be in real jewish trouble.’

    Or as I’ve said to many an insufferable Jew….. NEXT TIME – REAL OVENS

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. […] MacDonald ha scritto un pezzo in cui fa una riflessione per cercare di svelare questo mistero, per quale motivo  delle […]

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
A simple remedy for income stagnation