The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
What Obama Should Have Told Bibi
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Bibi and Obama

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is currently making one of his periodic devastating plundering raids on Washington and New York. During his visit he discreetly picked up a bunch of large checks from the Wall Street crowd, benefited from the plaudits dutifully delivered by the media and chattering class and has even met with President Barack Obama, whom he quite openly despises. Netanyahu and Obama carefully concealed their mutual dislike when in front of the cameras but the president also made all the right noises about Israel’s security “needs.” Apparently all the violence occurring in Israel-Palestine is the fault of the Palestinians and Israel always has the right to do whatever it wants to defend itself. Obama will follow up on the meeting by throwing billions of dollars of additional Danegeld at Netanyahu as a token of America’s undying love and fealty to Israel’s interests.

One wonders if Obama had his fingers crossed behind his back to indicate that he was lying to Bibi except for the intention to come up with more money, which is always an easy way out for America’s ruling class. It is generally convenient to pay off blackmailers like Netanyahu in hopes that they will stop whining. The president will in any event have to prepare himself to endure the usual firestorm coming from GOP presidential candidates later this week over his less than enthusiastic support for America’s greatest ally and best friend, which would have been a consequence of the visit no matter how it had turned out.

Last Thursday a full page ad placed by the World Jewish Congress appeared in the Washington Post, New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. The group’s president Ronald Lauder, the cosmetics company heir, provided the White House with suggestions for how to deal with the visiting Israeli leader. Predictably, he delivered some debatable assertions in constructing his argument as to why the president and prime minister should kiss and make up.

Lauder wants to “reinvigorate” the relationship with Israel because “never has this relationship been more important.” Wrong Ron, the Israeli connection is an enormous liability for the United States strategically speaking that has cost well in excess of $100 billion to the American taxpayer and has done untold political damage. Compared to other strategic partners in the region including Turkey and Egypt Israel is of little or no importance but for the fact that it has an enthusiastic, politically powerful and extremely wealthy domestic lobby conniving on its behalf. Which includes you, Ron.

Lauder goes on to cite “human disaster in Syria, ISIS moving on Iraq, [and] Iran’s bid to destabilize the region.” Well Ron, the human disaster in Syria and ISIS in Iraq have been caused by policies pushed by Israel and carried out by the United States, all starting with the Iraq war which was initiated at least in part for Israel by a cadre of neocons in the Bush Administration. Iran may not be a friend of the United States, but its support is desperately needed to eliminate ISIS and help stabilize Iraq. As always, Israel sees a U.S. led military solution to each and every problem dealing with Muslims. That might provide a comfort zone for Israeli politicians but it is bad for the United States and to be completely honest it is not even good for the Israeli people.

The ad also cites “the ongoing violent attacks against Jews in Israel” and that Israel is the “only democracy” in the Middle East. Ron, more than seven Palestinians have been killed for each dead Israeli, many of them shot execution style, but you seem to have forgotten that. The simple solution to the attacks would be for Israel to give up its endless and endlessly brutal occupation of the West Bank as well as its siege of Gaza. The knifings would end.

And what about democracy when it only applies to Jews? Netanyahu has proposed expelling thousands of Palestinians from East Jerusalem, where they and their ancestors have lived for centuries. And the continuous theft of Arab land and destruction of their livelihoods proceeds at an accelerated pace. If Ron Lauder and his friends really cared about suffering humanity instead of only the Jewish subset he would be using his considerable leverage to complain directly to Netanyahu and ask him to reverse his policies.

And how to fix things? Lauder claims that Netanyahu has “the greatness, the vision and the courage to move this relationship forward on a positive path.” Sure. And pigs have wings. Let’s face it Ron, Bibi is quite likely clinically insane. Even many Israelis are saying so, though they still vote for him based on his government’s relentlessly implemented and self-fulfilling program of inciting fear of Arabs.

For what it’s worth, this is what I propose Obama should have said to Bibi but didn’t, with a transcript of the conversation also faxed over to Ron Lauder at the World Jewish Congress:

  • “Nice to have you back Prime Minister, but not really as it’s close to lunchtime, to which, incidentally, you are not invited. Why don’t you stay home? You have been interfering in our politics and denigrating both me personally and my office for far too long. How would you like it if I were to go to Israel and endorse one of your opponents? If you keep up this crap I will revoke your visa and you’ll never visit here again.”
  • “And by the way, your plan to expel thousands of Arabs from East Jerusalem and to shoot kids throwing stones at your occupying army is not acceptable to us. And then there are new reports of your harvesting organs and other medical transplant material from the bodies of Palestinians that you have killed. There’s a long history of that in your country, but it’s a bit much even by your standards, isn’t it, and it begs the question whether there is anything that you won’t do. Next time a motion comes up in the United Nations condemning your brutality we will support it. Maybe we’ll co-sponsor or even propose it to show that we’re serious.”
  • “We are running out of money here in Washington and are thinking of cutting benefits to our own people. I note that Israelis have free medical care and university education, which means that we are subsidizing things that we Americans do not have so it hardly seems fair. We have been giving you more than $3 billion in aid every year and also looking the other way when you benefit from tax free charitable contributions that actually are illegal under American law. By executive order, I am stopping the cash flow and asking the IRS to look at your friends over here.”
  • “And speaking of Israel’s many friends, your good buddy at the State Department Victoria Nuland is now working down in the mail room. And I am asking the Justice Department to register the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) as a foreign agent, subject to having its finances and operations monitored by U.S. authorities. Oh, and your spy Jonathan Pollard will be denied parole later this month and will be the guest of a federal prison for the next twenty years.”
  • “I cannot see where you have done anything for us except complain. As you are now pledging Israel to continue its occupation of Palestinian land and ‘live by the sword’, meaning the killing of Arabs will accelerate, I am suspending all military cooperation with you until you come up with a plan to remove most of your settlers from the West Bank. Come back when you have something to show me. Don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.”

Well, okay, it was never bloody likely to happen that way, but I can dream, can’t I? If you think Obama is spineless when confronted by Ron Lauder and the usual suspects, just think of how bad it will be when we have President Clinton or President Rubio, proxies for their Israel firster donors Haim Saban and Paul Singer respectively. The new president and his or her staff will have to learn how to perform proskynesis whenever Netanyahu enters the oval office.

 
Hide 326 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Mark Green says: • Website

    Numerous American Presidents since Gerald Ford have complained about Israel’s ‘stranglehold’ on Washington. Even Truman–who unhesitatingly recognized the new Jewish state in 1948–deeply resented the Zionist lobby, writing in his diary that the implacable friends of Israel are “very, very selfish”. This unrelenting political distortion now affects all of Western civilization.

    With that in mind, the case can be made that it is Israel–not the US–that has become the world’s foremost superpower.

    After all, not only do Israelis and their minions shape all Mideast policies (and wars) coming out of Washington, but they enjoy undue influence in London, Paris, Frankfurt, Brussels, NY/Wall St., the Fed, Hollywood and even our courts. The situation is not good. Not by any means.

    What’s worse, judging by the rhetoric and pledges of every wannabe US presidential candidate, this undiagnosed malignancy is going to metastasize further before it’s recognized for what it is.

    Read More
    • Replies: @chris
    Very interesting point, Mark: "Israel–not the US–that has become the world’s foremost superpower"

    Their assent to the present situation is truly of biblical proportions; not necessarily in the Armageddon sense, but more in "pride before the fall," sense (though it's hard to see how you could have the latter without the former.)

    However, with them at the helm of the world, it doesn't exactly feel like the onset of the "1000 years of peace;" right now, there seems to be a certain brutality and desperation about their actions, like they're betting everything on the last card. (by "them" I mean, of course, Likudniks and those who line themselves up with them)

    Being a minority, Jews have usually worked in the background of political movements, shunning the spotlight that associated individuals with their race, but when you make an ass out of the nominal head of the empire, and then go and do your polka in his end zone, you've crossed a line from which you can't return to the status quo ante.

    This relationship will by necessity prove to be the Achilles's heel of the otherwise, seemingly, unstoppable empire.

    , @Chet Roman
    Actually, Truman recognized the State of Israel and specifically did not want to recognize it as the "Jewish State".

    http://www.trumanlibrary.org/exhibit_documents/index.php?tldate=1948-05-14&groupid=3429&pagenumber=1&collectionid=ROIexhibit
    , @Orville H. Larson
    " . . . Even Truman--who unhesitatingly recognized the new Jewish state in 1948--deeply resented the Zionist lobby, writing in his diary that the implacable friends of Israel are 'very, very selfish.'"

    Truman--the failed haberdasher/"Senator from Pendergast"/-turned President--recognized Israel over the strong objections of James V. Forrestal and George C. Marshall. Oh, yeah, and also in return for $2 million in campaign contributions from pro-Zionist sources.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. chris says:

    sadly, a very funny article, Phil ! Thanks !

    The only thing I am shocked about is that “Bibi” came to pick up the check and adulation himself and didn’t have Obama walk to Canossa and wait 3 days to be let in.

    Also, if I may add to your Wittenberg theses, we need to proscribe all companies and oligarchs who support the Apartheid regime, the way we’re currently doing to Russia.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. Frankie P says:

    Philip,

    Perhaps it’s time to admit that the US is not just a big idiot being led about by the Israelis and their fifth column in the US; the US is completely complicit in all the mess in the Middle East, Ukraine, etc. The majority of Americans seem to side with the apartheid state in the Levant, and I see NO SIGN of a politician emerging who will take on the Lobby. It’s time to start rooting for the voices of reason, you know, the ones Asshat Ashton Carter says pose strategic threats. Time to drop the nostalgic longing for the way we were and face the ugly present and potentially nightmarish future. All brought to you by your elected representatives in Washington. Either that, or put down your pen and pick up a gun. Time to water that tree again.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Greasy William

    Perhaps it’s time to admit that the US is not just a big idiot being led about by the Israelis and their fifth column in the US; the US is completely complicit in all the mess in the Middle East, Ukraine, etc. The majority of Americans seem to side with the apartheid state in the Levant, and I see NO SIGN of a politician emerging who will take on the Lobby
     
    Thank you! Finally one of you retards admits the truth. The American people do not give a shit about what happens to the Palestinians and there is nothing you can do to save them.

    Please educate your fellow retarded Paleocons so the rest of us don't need to keep listening to their endless complaining on the internet.


    If it makes you feel any better, Israel won't be an apartheid state much longer, as soon the Palestinians will all be dead or expelled. Enjoy them while they last.
    , @KA
    It is easy for us to blame the politicians on the ground of what is right and what is wrong. They are the products of the system . They are the finished and packaged goods ready for serve ,ready for delivery Ashton Carter,H Clinton, Huckabee Carson or Petreus or Fox anchors have gone through the ripening process and been well marinated . They are seasoned and veteran now.
    In some way they could be compared to the priest or lawyers or doctors who have graduated from the program. These people would not have graduated if they did not believe in God/ Bible, respect ing the judge , or in saving life and do no harm.
    Sme but perverse way , politicians wouldn't have come this far in their careers had they not learnt the essential of American policy regarding Middle East .already . If they had any weird ideas like " even handed ness or sticking to facts" pertaining to Israel and Middle East,they possibly would not have been even accepted in their youth in any political roles.

    It is true of any politicl system anywhere . But there is a big differrnce. At least in other countries ,it is still about the country concerned - their elite,their business,their financial houses nd military might and not about mortgaging those vital essentials to the whims of a foreign country.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. chris says:
    @Mark Green
    Numerous American Presidents since Gerald Ford have complained about Israel's 'stranglehold' on Washington. Even Truman--who unhesitatingly recognized the new Jewish state in 1948--deeply resented the Zionist lobby, writing in his diary that the implacable friends of Israel are "very, very selfish". This unrelenting political distortion now affects all of Western civilization.

    With that in mind, the case can be made that it is Israel--not the US--that has become the world's foremost superpower.

    After all, not only do Israelis and their minions shape all Mideast policies (and wars) coming out of Washington, but they enjoy undue influence in London, Paris, Frankfurt, Brussels, NY/Wall St., the Fed, Hollywood and even our courts. The situation is not good. Not by any means.

    What's worse, judging by the rhetoric and pledges of every wannabe US presidential candidate, this undiagnosed malignancy is going to metastasize further before it's recognized for what it is.

    Very interesting point, Mark: “Israel–not the US–that has become the world’s foremost superpower”

    Their assent to the present situation is truly of biblical proportions; not necessarily in the Armageddon sense, but more in “pride before the fall,” sense (though it’s hard to see how you could have the latter without the former.)

    However, with them at the helm of the world, it doesn’t exactly feel like the onset of the “1000 years of peace;” right now, there seems to be a certain brutality and desperation about their actions, like they’re betting everything on the last card. (by “them” I mean, of course, Likudniks and those who line themselves up with them)

    Being a minority, Jews have usually worked in the background of political movements, shunning the spotlight that associated individuals with their race, but when you make an ass out of the nominal head of the empire, and then go and do your polka in his end zone, you’ve crossed a line from which you can’t return to the status quo ante.

    This relationship will by necessity prove to be the Achilles’s heel of the otherwise, seemingly, unstoppable empire.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Clyde says:

    Obama is yesterday’s papers to Netanyahu who would have preferred to skip the meeting. But when in Washintoon DC you can’t skip out on a presidential summons. Obama needed this meet to give off the appearance of being even handed after screwing Israel on Iran and in countless other ways. Obama is as anti-Semitic as Louis Farrakhan who he interacted with while living in Chicago.

    Obama has been replaced. Netanyahu has been sidling up to Bad Vlad who looks like he/Russia will be providing cover and protection for a colossal Israeli developed (along with Texas Noble Energy) natural gas field off the Israeli coast. The Israelis don’t want to spend billions on natgas infrastructure then have it under constant rocket and missile bombardment by psychos of the Hamas and Hezbollah persuasions.
    So it looks like Israel will under the developing Middle Eastern Pax Russ. Power abhors vacuums, so while Obama has been shrinking the US role there, Bad Vlad is expanding Russia’s in Syria, Iran, Israel and so on.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Eustace Tilley (not)
    "...psychos of the Hamas and Hezbollah persuasions", my well-circumcised friend?

    Nazrallah is the shrewdest, most courageous, and (not incidentally) most successful leader in the Near East.
    , @Junior

    Obama is as anti-Semitic as Louis Farrakhan who he interacted with while living in Chicago.
     
    What makes you say that he's anti-Semitic, Clyde?

    "I decry racism and anti-Semitism in every form and strongly condemn the anti-Semitic statements made by Minister Farrakhan. I assume that Trumpet magazine made its own decision to honor Farrakhan based on his efforts to rehabilitate ex-offenders, but it is not a decision with which I agree." - Sen. Barack Obama (Jan. 15, 2008)

    http://mediamatters.org/research/2008/02/27/russert-persisted-in-questioning-obama-on-farra/142695
    , @annamaria
    Poor Israel. Ever a victim. A little parasitic exclave for the economic migrants from Eastern Europe, religious fanatics with superiority complex, and disillusioned progeny of kibbutznik. The problem with the US and EU is not so much the obnoxious, apartheid-channeling "chosen" that are suffering from their super ego (legacy of provincial shtettls), but the parasitic habits of using other people and other states to achieve the"chosen's" goals. From Jacob Shift to Kissinger and to the Kagans' cabal, the Zionists have been a malicious and destroying presence in the US. It is an open secret, that the last 14 years of the bloody wars in the Middle East have been serving mostly to Israel interests. There is, indeed, a "great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity," which has captured the US Congress and made the US into a substrate serving the interests of non-Americans.

    P.N.A.C: The Plan To Destabilize The Middle-East: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqTq8QL86TY
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9961877/Cost-to-US-of-Iraq-and-Afghan-wars-could-hit-6-trillion.html
    , @JoaoAlfaiate
    Hope so. Supporting the zionist state in Palestine makes the US a target. Let someone else pay for its crimes.
    , @Eileen Kuch
    There's nothing bad about Russian President Vladimir Putin, Clyde; he brought Russia out of dire poverty under the drunkard Boris Yeltsin by clearing out the mostly Jewish oligarchs that had been bleeding the country dry by pillaging the Treasury and restoring Russia to its Orthodox Christian roots.
    In addition, Putin has overhauled Russia's military to the point where no adversary .. even the USSA .. is able to defeat. To top it off, he didn't need a huge budget with which to accomplish this feat. Russia's weapons systems .. both defensive and offensive .. are superior, bar none; its fighter and bomber jets are superior .. as are its tanks and submarines.
    Also, in any meetings/dealings with Bibi, Putin didn't hesitate to put Israel's dictator in his place; whereas, in his most recent meeting with Bibi, Obama just about gave away the USSA store to him. And, guess what .. Teleprompter Barry never even once asked for our permission. That's how much he hates America.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Art says:

    Merry Christmas!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:

    Let’s face it Ron, Bibi is quite likely clinically insane.

    Truer words have never been spoke and they literally made me laugh out loud. The huge amount of lies that come out of both sides of the mouths of Netanyahu and his fellow Zionists is unbelievable. They truly represent hypocrisy at its finest.

    Lauder claims that Netanyahu has “the greatness, the vision and the courage to move this relationship forward on a positive path.” Sure. And pigs have wings.

    I guess that it’s to be expected that Lauder, of Estee Lauder cosmetics fame, would try putting lipstick on a pig and then try to make it fly. It’s still a pig no matter how much BS he tries to make-up.

    And, for what it’s worth also, here’s a video of what I was thinking would be my dream of what Obama should have said to Bibi. If ONLY Obama had the balls to treat Bibi like he does this heckler for what he’s done to America and the Palestinians as SOON as Bibi walked into the room before he even tries to say a word… No. Shame on ya. Get out… I’d be cheering Obama’s name like the people in this video. Hell, I’d throw him a ticker-tape parade. If only.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. @Clyde
    Obama is yesterday's papers to Netanyahu who would have preferred to skip the meeting. But when in Washintoon DC you can't skip out on a presidential summons. Obama needed this meet to give off the appearance of being even handed after screwing Israel on Iran and in countless other ways. Obama is as anti-Semitic as Louis Farrakhan who he interacted with while living in Chicago.

    Obama has been replaced. Netanyahu has been sidling up to Bad Vlad who looks like he/Russia will be providing cover and protection for a colossal Israeli developed (along with Texas Noble Energy) natural gas field off the Israeli coast. The Israelis don't want to spend billions on natgas infrastructure then have it under constant rocket and missile bombardment by psychos of the Hamas and Hezbollah persuasions.
    So it looks like Israel will under the developing Middle Eastern Pax Russ. Power abhors vacuums, so while Obama has been shrinking the US role there, Bad Vlad is expanding Russia's in Syria, Iran, Israel and so on.

    “…psychos of the Hamas and Hezbollah persuasions”, my well-circumcised friend?

    Nazrallah is the shrewdest, most courageous, and (not incidentally) most successful leader in the Near East.

    Read More
    • Agree: Vendetta
    • Replies: @Frankie P
    I really enjoy Nazrallahs speeches; I watched one with English subtitles a few years ago, and I was pleasantly surprised by the rational, reasonable explanations and policies he has for the situation in Lebanon, Syria and Palestine. I have since watched many of his speeches. He is a breath of fresh air; he is determined, fair-minded, and resolute. He has the spine that so many western leaders are missing. Grew up in a poor, multi-religious neighborhood in Beiruit. He still understands the importance of tolerance for those of other religious faiths, but he is adamant about the need for justice for the oppressed and displaced. He certainly does NOT hate Jews, but he DOES hate the crimes, past and present, of the State of Israel.
    , @Clyde

    Nazrallah is the shrewdest, most courageous, and (not incidentally) most successful leader in the Near East.
     
    If he's so smart how come his people walk around in rags same as before there ever was an Israel? All he offers them is war to take their minds off their hungry bellies and their children needing medicines. Allah is a war god. He is bored by peace so the Shiites will duke it out with the Sunnis when there is no one else around around. Now a days we have Alewites (semi-Shiite) fighting Sunni ISIS. Iran funds the Alewite regime and Gulf states fund ISIS. Everyone pitches in to back their favorite. It's much more interesting to the Islamic world this way, when they have skin in the game.
    Same way you might place a bet on a football game to make it more interesting.
    , @Vendetta
    Hamas are a gang of worthless psychopaths, but Hezbollah is a real different story. Never found stories about Hezbollah beheading their enemies or stabbing old ladies on the street. Nasrallah is deeply charismatic and clever, and if nothing else you have to respect them for their fighting skills. Best infantry in the Arab world.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:
    @Clyde
    Obama is yesterday's papers to Netanyahu who would have preferred to skip the meeting. But when in Washintoon DC you can't skip out on a presidential summons. Obama needed this meet to give off the appearance of being even handed after screwing Israel on Iran and in countless other ways. Obama is as anti-Semitic as Louis Farrakhan who he interacted with while living in Chicago.

    Obama has been replaced. Netanyahu has been sidling up to Bad Vlad who looks like he/Russia will be providing cover and protection for a colossal Israeli developed (along with Texas Noble Energy) natural gas field off the Israeli coast. The Israelis don't want to spend billions on natgas infrastructure then have it under constant rocket and missile bombardment by psychos of the Hamas and Hezbollah persuasions.
    So it looks like Israel will under the developing Middle Eastern Pax Russ. Power abhors vacuums, so while Obama has been shrinking the US role there, Bad Vlad is expanding Russia's in Syria, Iran, Israel and so on.

    Obama is as anti-Semitic as Louis Farrakhan who he interacted with while living in Chicago.

    What makes you say that he’s anti-Semitic, Clyde?

    “I decry racism and anti-Semitism in every form and strongly condemn the anti-Semitic statements made by Minister Farrakhan. I assume that Trumpet magazine made its own decision to honor Farrakhan based on his efforts to rehabilitate ex-offenders, but it is not a decision with which I agree.” – Sen. Barack Obama (Jan. 15, 2008)

    http://mediamatters.org/research/2008/02/27/russert-persisted-in-questioning-obama-on-farra/142695

    Read More
    • Replies: @Chet Roman
    Not only is Obama not anti-Semitic, he was essentially put in power by the American zionists like the Pritzkers and Crowns and is their obedient puppet. Penny Pritzker, one of the worst fraudsters in the recent financial crisis and a strong opponent of unions, didn't get appointed to head the Dept. of Commerce because of her progressive views.

    Abner Mikva, the former Jewish Chicago congressman, federal judge and White House counsel to President Bill Clinton said during Obama’s 2008 campaign:

    "I think when this is all over, people are going to say that Barack Obama is the first Jewish president,"

    Some of my earliest and most ardent supporters came from the Jewish community in Chicago," Obama told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency in 2004, The Chicago Jewish News, October 24, 2008

    Comcast (owned by uber zionists) was among the top backers of Barack Obama's presidential runs, with Comcast vice president David Cohen raising over $2.2 million from 2007 to 2012.

    I believe part of the reason for Netanyahoo's disdain for Obama is that he feels superior to the "Schwartza" and feels insulted that Obama doesn't immediately bend to his will. It's well known that with the rise of racism and Israeli supremacism that darks skinned people are treated much like they were in Alabama in the 1950's or very much worse.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. Frankie P says:
    @Eustace Tilley (not)
    "...psychos of the Hamas and Hezbollah persuasions", my well-circumcised friend?

    Nazrallah is the shrewdest, most courageous, and (not incidentally) most successful leader in the Near East.

    I really enjoy Nazrallahs speeches; I watched one with English subtitles a few years ago, and I was pleasantly surprised by the rational, reasonable explanations and policies he has for the situation in Lebanon, Syria and Palestine. I have since watched many of his speeches. He is a breath of fresh air; he is determined, fair-minded, and resolute. He has the spine that so many western leaders are missing. Grew up in a poor, multi-religious neighborhood in Beiruit. He still understands the importance of tolerance for those of other religious faiths, but he is adamant about the need for justice for the oppressed and displaced. He certainly does NOT hate Jews, but he DOES hate the crimes, past and present, of the State of Israel.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. geokat62 says:

    Phil, this article was like music to my ears.

    Speaking of music, you may not look a whole lot like Aaron Neville, but you sure do sound like him. Here, give a little listen:

    http://youtu.be/BXy93iEe2co

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. November 9 2015
    A day that will live in infamy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    MEANWHILE, for those following the Free Speech trial of RadicalPress publisher Arthur Topham in Canada.....
    http://dissidentvoice.org/2015/11/the-extraordinary-trial-of-arthur-topham/

    Excerpt:

    "The Crown chose to use an expert witness to show hate, and qualified Len Rudner as an expert in Judaism and anti-Semitism. Mr. Rudner’s biography indicates that he is a ‘professional Jew,’ in that he has been employed for the last 15 years by the Canadian Jewish Congress and its successor organization, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA). Prior to this trial, Rudner has attempted to force Mr. Topham’s internet service provider to shut down his web site, and has lodged civil complaints against Mr. Topham."

    and

    "Like a rabbi on acid, Atzmon explained his philosophy, allowed few questions, and browbeat the attorneys. He dealt with his own philosophical approach to Jewishness and the dangers of believing oneself ‘chosen’ and then he got in a few swipes at categories one and two as well. The jury was mesmerized. Later, Atzmon told friends that he had directed his remarks to the juror sleeping in the first row. If he could be made to listen, presumably the others could as well."
     
    GILAD ATZMON'S EXPERT TESTIMONY FOR TOPHAM
    http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/2015/11/9/the-expert-witness-part-1
    (This is brilliant. I encourage you to read all.)

    Excerpt:


    "Expert Witness Gilad Atzmon: Correct, yet, the fact that Jews feel hated doesn’t mean that anyone really hates them. It is also be possible that some Jews feel hated because they actually project their own hatred onto others.

    Attorney Barclay Johnson: I am slightly confused here it seems as if we are dealing with a sophisticated multi layered identity.

    Expert Witness Gilad Atzmon: You are totally correct, this topic is indeed confusing and for a reason. Contemporary Diaspora Jewish politics struggles to maintain this confusion because it stifles any from of criticism of Jewish politics. In order to understand this construct we should imagine the following kosher trinity.









    When we criticise Jewish politics (Israel, Zionism, the Lobby etc’) some Jews are“racially offended” in spite of the fact that race, biology, blood or ethnicity was never mentioned. When we criticise Jewish racism some Jews hide behind the argument that we are criticizing their religion. When we occasionally criticise the religion or some obscene Jewish religious teaching we are quick to learn that Jews are hardly religious anymore (which is true by the way). The meaning of it is simple, yet devastating. The Jewish triangle makes it very difficult, or even impossible to criticise Jewish politics, ideology and racism because the Identity is set as a field with a tri-polar gravity centre. The identity morphs endlessly. The contemporary 3rd category (political) Jew is everywhere and nowhere simultaneously, this is the quantum mechanics that is set to supress any possible criticism."
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. LondonBob says:

    If the Israelis were smart they would trade the occupied territories for the Golan Heights whilst the going was good. International opinion is turning, the narrative has changed and the invasions of Lebanon and Gaza were failures.

    Unfortunately the growth in the religious extremists makes such a rational settlement highly unlikely.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus

    If the Israelis were smart they would trade the occupied territories for the Golan Heights whilst the going was good.
     
    Black Gold Under the Golan

    Dick Cheney is an investor in the Texas business that formed an Israeli subsidiary to exploit the shale oil find in Golan.
    , @Quartermaster
    Israel can't give up the so called "occupied territories." Israel has not strategic depth without them and would not have survived the Yom Kippur war if she had not held them then. It would be an act of insanity to give them, or the Golan, up.

    International opinion may turning, but those in the know have seen that coming for some time. It will not end well for the enemies of Israel.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. annamaria says:
    @Clyde
    Obama is yesterday's papers to Netanyahu who would have preferred to skip the meeting. But when in Washintoon DC you can't skip out on a presidential summons. Obama needed this meet to give off the appearance of being even handed after screwing Israel on Iran and in countless other ways. Obama is as anti-Semitic as Louis Farrakhan who he interacted with while living in Chicago.

    Obama has been replaced. Netanyahu has been sidling up to Bad Vlad who looks like he/Russia will be providing cover and protection for a colossal Israeli developed (along with Texas Noble Energy) natural gas field off the Israeli coast. The Israelis don't want to spend billions on natgas infrastructure then have it under constant rocket and missile bombardment by psychos of the Hamas and Hezbollah persuasions.
    So it looks like Israel will under the developing Middle Eastern Pax Russ. Power abhors vacuums, so while Obama has been shrinking the US role there, Bad Vlad is expanding Russia's in Syria, Iran, Israel and so on.

    Poor Israel. Ever a victim. A little parasitic exclave for the economic migrants from Eastern Europe, religious fanatics with superiority complex, and disillusioned progeny of kibbutznik. The problem with the US and EU is not so much the obnoxious, apartheid-channeling “chosen” that are suffering from their super ego (legacy of provincial shtettls), but the parasitic habits of using other people and other states to achieve the”chosen’s” goals. From Jacob Shift to Kissinger and to the Kagans’ cabal, the Zionists have been a malicious and destroying presence in the US. It is an open secret, that the last 14 years of the bloody wars in the Middle East have been serving mostly to Israel interests. There is, indeed, a “great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity,” which has captured the US Congress and made the US into a substrate serving the interests of non-Americans.

    P.N.A.C: The Plan To Destabilize The Middle-East: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqTq8QL86TY

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9961877/Cost-to-US-of-Iraq-and-Afghan-wars-could-hit-6-trillion.html

    Read More
    • Agree: geokat62
    • Replies: @Clyde
    Half or more Israelis are from the Middle East, not Europe so you are wrong. Lots of Israeli Jews look like Arabs and have same skin color. Christians and Yazidi are preyed upon by ISIS Sunni Muslims because they are not armed. The Jews are armed. So big difference in the Middle East if your ethnic group has effective weaponry. You or at least your parents must be Christian. Think less about Israel and more about the ISIS brand of imperialism and Lebensraum that is slaughtering Christian Arabs and destroying Christian villages and communities across Iraq and Syria.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. @LondonBob
    If the Israelis were smart they would trade the occupied territories for the Golan Heights whilst the going was good. International opinion is turning, the narrative has changed and the invasions of Lebanon and Gaza were failures.

    Unfortunately the growth in the religious extremists makes such a rational settlement highly unlikely.

    If the Israelis were smart they would trade the occupied territories for the Golan Heights whilst the going was good.

    Black Gold Under the Golan

    Dick Cheney is an investor in the Texas business that formed an Israeli subsidiary to exploit the shale oil find in Golan.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    Dick Cheney is an investor in the Texas business...
     
    Cheney is also an investor in Haliburton, a company that was awarded no-bid contracts for rebuilding Iraq.

    So this is how the game is played: the US MIC gets billions in armament sales to destroy the Zionist Project's enemies, and companies like Halibuton make billions to rebuild it. Rinse and repeat.

    If you look at the portfolios of the top Zionists/Israel firsters, they are heavily weighted in these two types of stocks.

    And the best thing about it is if you are God's chosen, you don't have any sense of guilt because you know that, on the basis of Exodus 17:14, G-d has promised his people that he will help them "blot out the name" of Amalek.

    So what has become abundantly clear over the last decade and a half is that governments no longer pursue policies that are in the national interest. They pursue policies that are in the interest of the 1%. But I can assure you that their Return on Investment (ROI) is much higher than 1%. Just ask Cheney et al.
    , @Vendetta
    Rocket targets in the Golan Heights, an investment plan that's sure to pay off.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. Sherman says:

    Israel has an “enthusiastic, politically powerful and extremely wealthy domestic Libby conniving on its [email protected]

    Thank goodness for that.

    This more than offsets the hate-filled anti-Israel propaganda from fringe Holocaust deniers like Giraldi.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Junior

    This more than offsets the hate-filled anti-Israel propaganda from fringe Holocaust deniers like Giraldi.
     
    You keep making this claim of Mr. Giraldi being a "Holocaust denier" and yet you have yet to give any proof. So? Care to share some examples with links or are you just going to keep on making unsubstantiated libelous claims?
    , @annamaria
    "Israel has an “enthusiastic, politically powerful and extremely wealthy domestic Lobby conniving on its behalf.."
    Conniving against whom? And for whose expense? The victims of the WWII included the enormous numbers of other non-arians, for instance, Slavs, yet the Holocaust Museums are focused on one ethnic group only. The deaths of Palestinian children and teenagers by Israeli weaponry are more than a stain on the Israeli narrative of Holocaust - the collective punishment of the civilian populations on the Israel-occupied territories, and the astonishing murderous behavior of Illegal settlers, make a rejection of the moral loading of the Holocaust narrative. Zionism is an ugly and malignant disease that puts conscientious Jewery in a difficult position. Zionist has evolved into the apartheid practices, warmongering, stealing other people' land and property, while generously dressing the rationale for these activities with theocratic source and often-questionable historical claims.
    The current discussion is actually about the Zionists' disloyalty to the countries of their comfortable dwelling. The USA have been used by Israel via the US Zionists; this use was and is parasitic.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. I’ve done everything for Jew.

    They’ve done nothing for me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  18. Marais says:

    “…this is what I propose Obama should have said…”

    I’d settle for:

    Good morning Prime Minister. I believe you know former President Jimmy Carter, who has selflessly consented to be our new ambassador to your wonderful country. He will have full authority over all future aid (if any) and will chair the meeting today. I have other commitments, so President Carter will conduct you to a conference room at DOS. Please give my regards to Ran Baratz.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. Clyde says:
    @Eustace Tilley (not)
    "...psychos of the Hamas and Hezbollah persuasions", my well-circumcised friend?

    Nazrallah is the shrewdest, most courageous, and (not incidentally) most successful leader in the Near East.

    Nazrallah is the shrewdest, most courageous, and (not incidentally) most successful leader in the Near East.

    If he’s so smart how come his people walk around in rags same as before there ever was an Israel? All he offers them is war to take their minds off their hungry bellies and their children needing medicines. Allah is a war god. He is bored by peace so the Shiites will duke it out with the Sunnis when there is no one else around around. Now a days we have Alewites (semi-Shiite) fighting Sunni ISIS. Iran funds the Alewite regime and Gulf states fund ISIS. Everyone pitches in to back their favorite. It’s much more interesting to the Islamic world this way, when they have skin in the game.
    Same way you might place a bet on a football game to make it more interesting.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Eustace Tilley (not)
    Yes, he is greatly to blame for not being able to hop on an El Al jet, address the fawning claque of the US Congress, pose for a photo op with Mr. President, and shake down the goyim for tens of billions of dollars in goyische Schuldgeld. Maybe he should hire some Western "historians" and "scholars" to write a fake Holy Book about the Shia being the Chosen People of A***h having an eternal sacred right to Lebanon. Maybe he should buy the Western Lugenpresse to tell only his side of the story.
    , @Druid
    You revel in ignorance!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Clyde says:
    @annamaria
    Poor Israel. Ever a victim. A little parasitic exclave for the economic migrants from Eastern Europe, religious fanatics with superiority complex, and disillusioned progeny of kibbutznik. The problem with the US and EU is not so much the obnoxious, apartheid-channeling "chosen" that are suffering from their super ego (legacy of provincial shtettls), but the parasitic habits of using other people and other states to achieve the"chosen's" goals. From Jacob Shift to Kissinger and to the Kagans' cabal, the Zionists have been a malicious and destroying presence in the US. It is an open secret, that the last 14 years of the bloody wars in the Middle East have been serving mostly to Israel interests. There is, indeed, a "great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity," which has captured the US Congress and made the US into a substrate serving the interests of non-Americans.

    P.N.A.C: The Plan To Destabilize The Middle-East: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqTq8QL86TY
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9961877/Cost-to-US-of-Iraq-and-Afghan-wars-could-hit-6-trillion.html

    Half or more Israelis are from the Middle East, not Europe so you are wrong. Lots of Israeli Jews look like Arabs and have same skin color. Christians and Yazidi are preyed upon by ISIS Sunni Muslims because they are not armed. The Jews are armed. So big difference in the Middle East if your ethnic group has effective weaponry. You or at least your parents must be Christian. Think less about Israel and more about the ISIS brand of imperialism and Lebensraum that is slaughtering Christian Arabs and destroying Christian villages and communities across Iraq and Syria.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JoaoAlfaiate
    Are you saying ISIS is practicing ethnic cleansing like the zionists in 1948 and 1967?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Marais says:

    2,200 more settlement units were approved by the Likud government yesterday as Netanyahu met with Obama. Coincidence?

    http://mondoweiss.net/2015/11/netanyahu-flips-settlements

    America should start deducting $1,000,000 from US aid for each new settlement unit: in this case $2,200,000,000. If Israel has the money to build illegal settlements, it has the money to pay for weapons.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. geokat62 says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    If the Israelis were smart they would trade the occupied territories for the Golan Heights whilst the going was good.
     
    Black Gold Under the Golan

    Dick Cheney is an investor in the Texas business that formed an Israeli subsidiary to exploit the shale oil find in Golan.

    Dick Cheney is an investor in the Texas business…

    Cheney is also an investor in Haliburton, a company that was awarded no-bid contracts for rebuilding Iraq.

    So this is how the game is played: the US MIC gets billions in armament sales to destroy the Zionist Project’s enemies, and companies like Halibuton make billions to rebuild it. Rinse and repeat.

    If you look at the portfolios of the top Zionists/Israel firsters, they are heavily weighted in these two types of stocks.

    And the best thing about it is if you are God’s chosen, you don’t have any sense of guilt because you know that, on the basis of Exodus 17:14, G-d has promised his people that he will help them “blot out the name” of Amalek.

    So what has become abundantly clear over the last decade and a half is that governments no longer pursue policies that are in the national interest. They pursue policies that are in the interest of the 1%. But I can assure you that their Return on Investment (ROI) is much higher than 1%. Just ask Cheney et al.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62
    Oh, I almost forgot to ask you something. In another thread, I believe it was Germany Against Itself, you indicated that the edit function was not working.

    Was this a one-time occurrence, or is the edit function still not working for you?
    , @another fred

    So what has become abundantly clear over the last decade century and a half is that governments no longer pursue policies that are in the national interest.
     
    FTFY

    Unless, of course, one holds that the business of America is business.

    , @Marais

    “Cheney is also an investor in Haliburton, a company that was awarded no-bid contracts for rebuilding Iraq.”
     
    KBR (spun off from Halliburton 2007) leads the list of government contracts for Iraq 2003-13: $39.5 billion of a $138 billion total [Angelo Young, IBTimes 19 Mar 2013].

    “I can tell you, Joe, the government had absolutely nothing to do with it.”
    -Dick Cheney, responding to Lieberman’s comment that he had done well financially at Halliburton, October 2000 Debate
     
    Government had everything to do with it.

    Cheney, who had little business experience and none in the oil industry, was hired as CEO of Halliburton in August 1995. The company’s government business under LOGCAP (which Cheney helped craft as Secretary of Defense in 1992) went from $144 million in 1994 to $423 million in 1996, and $900 million plus in 1999. The company billed the government $2 billion for Project Joint Endeavor (Bosnia & Kosovo) 1995-2000 on a cost-plus basis.

    Under Cheney, Halliburton rose from 73rd to 18th on the Pentagon’s contractor list; it’s government contracting rose 91%. Halliburton secured $100 million in government backed loans from the US Export-Import Bank 1990-1995; under Cheney’s tenure it received $1.5 billion (1995-2000).

    Cheney resigned from Halliburton in July 2000 to run with GW Bush. He cashed in $30 million in stock options and continued to receive deferred salary ($205,298 in 2001; $162,392 in 2002; $178,437 in 2003) and held 433,333 unexercised stock options in 2004. His net worth (after five years as CEO of a private company) was estimated at $70 million plus.

    “governments no longer pursue policies that are in the national interest. They pursue policies that are in the interest of the 1%.”
     
    The 1% probably share the same belief as Louis XIV: “L’État c’est moi” (“I am the state”). And they’re busy replacing republican democracy with corporate feudalism.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. geokat62 says:
    @geokat62

    Dick Cheney is an investor in the Texas business...
     
    Cheney is also an investor in Haliburton, a company that was awarded no-bid contracts for rebuilding Iraq.

    So this is how the game is played: the US MIC gets billions in armament sales to destroy the Zionist Project's enemies, and companies like Halibuton make billions to rebuild it. Rinse and repeat.

    If you look at the portfolios of the top Zionists/Israel firsters, they are heavily weighted in these two types of stocks.

    And the best thing about it is if you are God's chosen, you don't have any sense of guilt because you know that, on the basis of Exodus 17:14, G-d has promised his people that he will help them "blot out the name" of Amalek.

    So what has become abundantly clear over the last decade and a half is that governments no longer pursue policies that are in the national interest. They pursue policies that are in the interest of the 1%. But I can assure you that their Return on Investment (ROI) is much higher than 1%. Just ask Cheney et al.

    Oh, I almost forgot to ask you something. In another thread, I believe it was Germany Against Itself, you indicated that the edit function was not working.

    Was this a one-time occurrence, or is the edit function still not working for you?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. @geokat62

    Dick Cheney is an investor in the Texas business...
     
    Cheney is also an investor in Haliburton, a company that was awarded no-bid contracts for rebuilding Iraq.

    So this is how the game is played: the US MIC gets billions in armament sales to destroy the Zionist Project's enemies, and companies like Halibuton make billions to rebuild it. Rinse and repeat.

    If you look at the portfolios of the top Zionists/Israel firsters, they are heavily weighted in these two types of stocks.

    And the best thing about it is if you are God's chosen, you don't have any sense of guilt because you know that, on the basis of Exodus 17:14, G-d has promised his people that he will help them "blot out the name" of Amalek.

    So what has become abundantly clear over the last decade and a half is that governments no longer pursue policies that are in the national interest. They pursue policies that are in the interest of the 1%. But I can assure you that their Return on Investment (ROI) is much higher than 1%. Just ask Cheney et al.

    So what has become abundantly clear over the last decade century and a half is that governments no longer pursue policies that are in the national interest.

    FTFY

    Unless, of course, one holds that the business of America is business.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Realist says:

    It does not matter what Obama does in his time left. Since the ‘Supreme Court’ ruled that there was no limit on the amount of money a person could give in support of a candidate the rich have totally controlled the election process in the US. This plus the fact that politicians have no morals or integrity will drive this country to oblivion. Most of the money comes from rich Zionist Jews in support of Israel.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  26. Rurik says:

    Bibi is quite likely clinically insane.

    Moshe Yatom, a prominent Israeli psychiatrist who successfully cured the most extreme forms of mental illness throughout a distinguished career, was found dead at his home in Tel Aviv yesterday from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound. A suicide note at his side explained that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been his patient for the last nine years, had “sucked the life right out of me.”

    “I can’t take it anymore,” wrote Yatom. “Robbery is redemption, apartheid is freedom, peace activists are terrorists, murder is self-defense, piracy is legality, Palestinians are Jordanians, annexation is liberation, there’s no end to his contradictions. Freud promised rationality would reign in the instinctual passions, but he never met Bibi Netanyahu. This guy would say Gandhi invented brass knuckes.”

    http://gauhar.com/?p=626

    Psychiatrists are familiar with the human tendency to massage the truth to avoid confronting emotionally troubling material, but Yatom was apparently stunned at what he called the “waterfall of lies” gushing from his most illustrious patient. His personal diary details the steady disintegration of his once invincible personality under the barrage of self-serving rationalizations put forth by Netanyahu.

    >>><<<

    The first of Yatom’s strokes occurred when Netanyahu offered his opinion that the 911 attacks on Washington and New York “were good.” The second followed a session in which Netanyahu insisted that Iran and Nazi Germany were identical. And the third occurred after the Prime Minister declared Iran’s nuclear energy program was a “flying gas chamber,” and that all Jews everywhere “lived permanently in Auschwitz.” Yatom’s efforts to calm Netanyahu’s hysteria were extremely taxing emotionally and routinely ended in failure. “The alibi is always the same with him,” complained another diary entry. “The Jews are on the verge of annihilation at the hands of the racist goyim and the only way to save the day is to carry out one final massacre.”

    there’s more there at the link

    but is isn’t just Bibi. He is a representation of something gone terribly wrong with the megalomaniacal psychopathic id of the Zionist. Where killing teenagers willy-nilly to harvest their organs is considered a ho hum no-brainer. Just like the buying and selling of European young women smuggled in as abject sex slaves, raped, beaten, drugged and literally bought and sold naked on the block as grotesquely as any negro slave in 17th century America. This stuff is all taken for granted by these people, who bring comfy chairs and sofas to watch the shelling of Gaza from the hill tops. Or congratulating their brave comrades in arms as they take pot shots at children playing on rooftops.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUibXSgILv0

    it isn’t just Bibi who’s insane

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sherman
    The "Moshe Yatom" story is a discredited hoax you imbecile. There was never such a person.

    If he was indeed such a "prominent Israeli psychiatrist" his name would have appeared outside of fringe anti-Israel websites when he is Googled.

    If you choose to be an anti-Semite at least be a competent one.
    , @SolontoCroesus
    Even as the president of the United States, Barack Also-insane Obama, damned Palestinians and gave Bibi the Insane Netanyahu yet more weapons to kill Palestinians (and Iranians), one mile away, at the Palestine Center, a crowded theater watched and listened as Mads Gilbert displayed photos and played the sounds of children screaming as their shattered bodies were attempted to be repaired by Dr. Gilbert and his fellows after IDF had shattered them with DIME and other hi-tech weapons.

    Night in Gaza

    Chris Hedges has written of the many creative uses Israelis make of the billions of dollars in weaponry that the American people supply to that pariah state:

    A Gaza Diary, by Chris Hedges It is still. The camp waits, as if holding its breath. And then, out of the dry furnace air, a disembodied voice crackles over a loudspeaker.

    "Come on, dogs," the voice booms in Arabic. "Where are all the dogs of Khan Younis? Come! Come!"

    I stand up. I walk outside the hut. The invective continues to spew: "Son of a bitch!" "Son of a whore!" "Your mother's cunt!"

    The boys dart in small packs up the sloping dunes to the electric fence that separates the camp from the Jewish settlement. They lob rocks toward two armored jeeps parked on top of the dune and mounted with loudspeakers. Three ambulances line the road below the dunes in anticipation of what is to come.

    A percussion grenade explodes. The boys, most no more than ten or eleven years old, scatter, running clumsily across the heavy sand. They descend out of sight behind a sandbank in front of me. There are no sounds of gunfire. The soldiers shoot with silencers. The bullets from the M-16 rifles tumble end over end through the children's slight bodies. Later, in the hospital, I will see the destruction: the stomachs ripped out, the gaping holes in limbs and torsos.

    Yesterday at this spot the Israelis shot eight young men, six of whom were under the age of eighteen. One was twelve. This afternoon they kill an eleven-year-old boy, Ali Murad, and seriously wound four more, three of whom are under eighteen. Children have been shot in other conflicts I have covered—death squads gunned them down in El Salvador and Guatemala, mothers with infants were lined up and massacred in Algeria, and Serb snipers put children in their sights and watched them crumple onto the pavement in Sarajevo—but I have never before watched soldiers entice children like mice into a trap and murder them for sport.
     
    ----------------

    All governments lie, as I.F. Stone pointed out, including Israel and Hamas. But Israel engages in the kinds of jaw-dropping lies that characterize despotic and totalitarian regimes. It does not deform the truth; it inverts it. It routinely paints a picture for the outside world that is diametrically opposed to reality. And all of us reporters who have covered the occupied territories have run into Israel’s Alice-in-Wonderland narratives, which we dutifully insert into our stories—required under the rules of American journalism—although we know they are untrue.

    I saw small boys baited and killed by Israeli soldiers in the Gaza refugee camp of Khan Younis. The soldiers swore at the boys in Arabic over the loudspeakers of their armored jeep. The boys, about 10 years old, then threw stones at an Israeli vehicle and the soldiers opened fire, killing some, wounding others. I was present more than once as Israeli troops drew out and shot Palestinian children in this way. Such incidents, in the Israeli lexicon, become children caught in crossfire. I was in Gaza when F-16 attack jets dropped 1,000-pound iron fragmentation bombs on overcrowded hovels in Gaza City. I saw the corpses of the victims, including children. This became a surgical strike on a bomb-making factory. I have watched Israel demolish homes and entire apartment blocks to create wide buffer zones between the Palestinians and the Israeli troops that ring Gaza. I have interviewed the destitute and homeless families, some camped out in crude shelters erected in the rubble. The destruction becomes the demolition of the homes of terrorists. I have stood in the remains of schools—Israel struck two United Nations schools in the last six days, causing at least 10 fatalities at one in Rafah on Sunday and at least 19 at one in the Jebaliya refugee camp Wednesday—as well as medical clinics and mosques. I have heard Israel claim that errant rockets or mortar fire from the Palestinians caused these and other deaths, or that the attacked spots were being used as arms depots or launching sites. I, along with every other reporter I know who has worked in Gaza, have never seen any evidence that Hamas uses civilians as “human shields.”

    There is a perverted logic to Israel’s repeated use of the Big Lie—Große Lüge—the lie favored by tyrants from Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin to Saddam Hussein. The Big Lie feeds the two reactions Israel seeks to elicit—racism among its supporters and terror among its victims.

    By painting a picture of an army that never attacks civilians, that indeed goes out of its way to protect them, the Big Lie says Israelis are civilized and humane, and their Palestinian opponents are inhuman monsters. The Big Lie serves the idea that the slaughter in Gaza is a clash of civilizations, a war between democracy, decency and honor on one side and Islamic barbarism on the other. And in the uncommon cases when news of atrocities penetrates to the wider public, Israel blames the destruction and casualties on Hamas. Why Israel Lies," by Chris Hedges
     
    ---

    As commented and linked elsewhere, Kathy Peiss reported with enormous satisfaction that her uncle was among those Jews and other WWII victors who stole, removed, and destroyed books and documents of Nazi racism. The world can never know the truth of that era; as Peiss revealed, the chain-of-evidence has been tainted. Nothing that any Jewish person or Allied victor says can be believed.

    But this time around, the world is watching in real-time, bearing witness, and compiling evidence dossiers, as American and Israeli leaders, and the many American, Jewish and Israeli people who support them, carry on committing crimes against humanity.

    They think they act with impunity.

    Every gutter-level addict and every habitual criminal thinks he acts with impunity.

    But there are witnesses to these crimes against humanity.

    Moreover, there is one certainty in this life: addicts, and criminals, will hit the wall.

    The only question is how many lives will be destroyed until that happens.

    --- ah -- another question: What can those who witness this destructive behavior do to hasten the moment when those criminals hit the wall?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. @LondonBob
    If the Israelis were smart they would trade the occupied territories for the Golan Heights whilst the going was good. International opinion is turning, the narrative has changed and the invasions of Lebanon and Gaza were failures.

    Unfortunately the growth in the religious extremists makes such a rational settlement highly unlikely.

    Israel can’t give up the so called “occupied territories.” Israel has not strategic depth without them and would not have survived the Yom Kippur war if she had not held them then. It would be an act of insanity to give them, or the Golan, up.

    International opinion may turning, but those in the know have seen that coming for some time. It will not end well for the enemies of Israel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sherman
    International opinion is turning but it seems to be turning in favor of Israel.

    China and India are tripping over each other to do business in Israel.

    Today London Mayor Boris Johnson - who has an eye on becoming PM some day - is in Israel and praising the country.
    , @JoaoAlfaiate
    On the other hand if the zionist enterprise had not been holding Sinai, the Golan, occupied east Jerusalem, etc., etc., the Yom Kippur attack would never have taken place.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. Sherman says:
    @Rurik

    Bibi is quite likely clinically insane.
     
    Moshe Yatom, a prominent Israeli psychiatrist who successfully cured the most extreme forms of mental illness throughout a distinguished career, was found dead at his home in Tel Aviv yesterday from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound. A suicide note at his side explained that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been his patient for the last nine years, had “sucked the life right out of me.”

    “I can’t take it anymore,” wrote Yatom. “Robbery is redemption, apartheid is freedom, peace activists are terrorists, murder is self-defense, piracy is legality, Palestinians are Jordanians, annexation is liberation, there’s no end to his contradictions. Freud promised rationality would reign in the instinctual passions, but he never met Bibi Netanyahu. This guy would say Gandhi invented brass knuckes.”

    http://gauhar.com/?p=626

    Psychiatrists are familiar with the human tendency to massage the truth to avoid confronting emotionally troubling material, but Yatom was apparently stunned at what he called the “waterfall of lies” gushing from his most illustrious patient. His personal diary details the steady disintegration of his once invincible personality under the barrage of self-serving rationalizations put forth by Netanyahu.

    >>><<<

    The first of Yatom’s strokes occurred when Netanyahu offered his opinion that the 911 attacks on Washington and New York “were good.” The second followed a session in which Netanyahu insisted that Iran and Nazi Germany were identical. And the third occurred after the Prime Minister declared Iran’s nuclear energy program was a “flying gas chamber,” and that all Jews everywhere “lived permanently in Auschwitz.” Yatom’s efforts to calm Netanyahu’s hysteria were extremely taxing emotionally and routinely ended in failure. “The alibi is always the same with him,” complained another diary entry. “The Jews are on the verge of annihilation at the hands of the racist goyim and the only way to save the day is to carry out one final massacre.”


    there's more there at the link

    but is isn't just Bibi. He is a representation of something gone terribly wrong with the megalomaniacal psychopathic id of the Zionist. Where killing teenagers willy-nilly to harvest their organs is considered a ho hum no-brainer. Just like the buying and selling of European young women smuggled in as abject sex slaves, raped, beaten, drugged and literally bought and sold naked on the block as grotesquely as any negro slave in 17th century America. This stuff is all taken for granted by these people, who bring comfy chairs and sofas to watch the shelling of Gaza from the hill tops. Or congratulating their brave comrades in arms as they take pot shots at children playing on rooftops.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUibXSgILv0

    it isn't just Bibi who's insane

    The “Moshe Yatom” story is a discredited hoax you imbecile. There was never such a person.

    If he was indeed such a “prominent Israeli psychiatrist” his name would have appeared outside of fringe anti-Israel websites when he is Googled.

    If you choose to be an anti-Semite at least be a competent one.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JoaoAlfaiate
    You mean the whole story is a hoax? Isn't that what some people say about Bibi's claim that the Palestinians are responsible for the Holocaust (TM) ?
    , @Rurik
    http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Moshe-Yatom/1503303119

    https://rehmat2.wordpress.com/2010/07/08/study-is-mental-illness-a-jewish-disease/

    OK general, well it appears I may have been duped. Won't be the first time.

    However, if he did or didn't drive some people to suicide with his playing fast and loose with the truth and his rapid and infamous contempt for the sanctity of human life and dignity of all human beings, regardless of their religion or race, it still has little to do with the facts that we all agree on. He is leading a movement to genocide the rightful and legal owners of the land of Palestine by a campaign of mass-murder and human rights atrocities. His IDF shoots teenagers for target practice when they aren't running over idealistic American young women with bulldozers who foolishly believe that no man would do such a thing. That poor girl was wrong. We should have all warned her.

    And for the record, general, I'm no more an anti-Semite than I am an anti-Zionist. I believe that all peoples have a right to self-determination. Jews too. I just don't believe that Jewish self-determination should be achieved by genociding another people off the planet. It creates the Jewish state on a foundation of illegitimacy and the blood of innocents. Perhaps that's what N. America was built on too, but today, and especially after humanities' moral maturity following the Holocaust, we ought to know better now. Especially the Jews.

    So yes, I do offer a critique of Zionism as it's being foisted today, and especially as I'm being forced with my tax dollars and the collaboration of my government at every level of this terrible crime today to be complicit with it. 'It' being the murder and theft and humiliation of an entire people for the crime of existing on land that is coveted by others. It's monstrous and a blight on the human race that it is tolerated, let alone funded and praised.

    So, on that day that the nobility that lingers in the Jewish soul finds its voice, I'll be there standing strong and proud with my brothers and sisters of the human race. Until that day, as long as psychopaths torment helpless people for the fun and cruelty of it all, I'll condemn it. And with your help, pointing out when I'm in error, together we'll get to the truth of it all.

    So thank you general. I'm grateful for your careful vetting of the accuracy of what's said here, and especially when I'm in error somehow. That is the last thing I want- quite the contrary- and one of the things I love about this place.

    Salaam Alaikum
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. Sherman says:
    @Quartermaster
    Israel can't give up the so called "occupied territories." Israel has not strategic depth without them and would not have survived the Yom Kippur war if she had not held them then. It would be an act of insanity to give them, or the Golan, up.

    International opinion may turning, but those in the know have seen that coming for some time. It will not end well for the enemies of Israel.

    International opinion is turning but it seems to be turning in favor of Israel.

    China and India are tripping over each other to do business in Israel.

    Today London Mayor Boris Johnson – who has an eye on becoming PM some day – is in Israel and praising the country.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    Well:
    "China and Iran's New Love Affair?" http://nationalinterest.org/feature/china-irans-new-love-affair-13434
    "India and Iran: Challenges and Opportunity" http://thediplomat.com/2015/09/india-iran-relations-challenges-and-opportunity/
    The most important factor explaining the US/UK politicians' loudly-proclaimed love for Israel is money. The smothering stench of corruption.
    , @Realist
    "International opinion is turning but it seems to be turning in favor of Israel."

    In your dreams.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. @Quartermaster
    Israel can't give up the so called "occupied territories." Israel has not strategic depth without them and would not have survived the Yom Kippur war if she had not held them then. It would be an act of insanity to give them, or the Golan, up.

    International opinion may turning, but those in the know have seen that coming for some time. It will not end well for the enemies of Israel.

    On the other hand if the zionist enterprise had not been holding Sinai, the Golan, occupied east Jerusalem, etc., etc., the Yom Kippur attack would never have taken place.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. @Sherman
    The "Moshe Yatom" story is a discredited hoax you imbecile. There was never such a person.

    If he was indeed such a "prominent Israeli psychiatrist" his name would have appeared outside of fringe anti-Israel websites when he is Googled.

    If you choose to be an anti-Semite at least be a competent one.

    You mean the whole story is a hoax? Isn’t that what some people say about Bibi’s claim that the Palestinians are responsible for the Holocaust (TM) ?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. @Clyde
    Half or more Israelis are from the Middle East, not Europe so you are wrong. Lots of Israeli Jews look like Arabs and have same skin color. Christians and Yazidi are preyed upon by ISIS Sunni Muslims because they are not armed. The Jews are armed. So big difference in the Middle East if your ethnic group has effective weaponry. You or at least your parents must be Christian. Think less about Israel and more about the ISIS brand of imperialism and Lebensraum that is slaughtering Christian Arabs and destroying Christian villages and communities across Iraq and Syria.

    Are you saying ISIS is practicing ethnic cleansing like the zionists in 1948 and 1967?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. RobinG says:
    @SolontoCroesus
    November 9 2015
    A day that will live in infamy.

    MEANWHILE, for those following the Free Speech trial of RadicalPress publisher Arthur Topham in Canada…..

    http://dissidentvoice.org/2015/11/the-extraordinary-trial-of-arthur-topham/

    Excerpt:

    “The Crown chose to use an expert witness to show hate, and qualified Len Rudner as an expert in Judaism and anti-Semitism. Mr. Rudner’s biography indicates that he is a ‘professional Jew,’ in that he has been employed for the last 15 years by the Canadian Jewish Congress and its successor organization, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA). Prior to this trial, Rudner has attempted to force Mr. Topham’s internet service provider to shut down his web site, and has lodged civil complaints against Mr. Topham.”

    and

    “Like a rabbi on acid, Atzmon explained his philosophy, allowed few questions, and browbeat the attorneys. He dealt with his own philosophical approach to Jewishness and the dangers of believing oneself ‘chosen’ and then he got in a few swipes at categories one and two as well. The jury was mesmerized. Later, Atzmon told friends that he had directed his remarks to the juror sleeping in the first row. If he could be made to listen, presumably the others could as well.”

    GILAD ATZMON’S EXPERT TESTIMONY FOR TOPHAM

    http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/2015/11/9/the-expert-witness-part-1

    (This is brilliant. I encourage you to read all.)

    Excerpt:

    “Expert Witness Gilad Atzmon: Correct, yet, the fact that Jews feel hated doesn’t mean that anyone really hates them. It is also be possible that some Jews feel hated because they actually project their own hatred onto others.

    Attorney Barclay Johnson: I am slightly confused here it seems as if we are dealing with a sophisticated multi layered identity.

    Expert Witness Gilad Atzmon: You are totally correct, this topic is indeed confusing and for a reason. Contemporary Diaspora Jewish politics struggles to maintain this confusion because it stifles any from of criticism of Jewish politics. In order to understand this construct we should imagine the following kosher trinity.

    When we criticise Jewish politics (Israel, Zionism, the Lobby etc’) some Jews are“racially offended” in spite of the fact that race, biology, blood or ethnicity was never mentioned. When we criticise Jewish racism some Jews hide behind the argument that we are criticizing their religion. When we occasionally criticise the religion or some obscene Jewish religious teaching we are quick to learn that Jews are hardly religious anymore (which is true by the way). The meaning of it is simple, yet devastating. The Jewish triangle makes it very difficult, or even impossible to criticise Jewish politics, ideology and racism because the Identity is set as a field with a tri-polar gravity centre. The identity morphs endlessly. The contemporary 3rd category (political) Jew is everywhere and nowhere simultaneously, this is the quantum mechanics that is set to supress any possible criticism.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. @Clyde
    Obama is yesterday's papers to Netanyahu who would have preferred to skip the meeting. But when in Washintoon DC you can't skip out on a presidential summons. Obama needed this meet to give off the appearance of being even handed after screwing Israel on Iran and in countless other ways. Obama is as anti-Semitic as Louis Farrakhan who he interacted with while living in Chicago.

    Obama has been replaced. Netanyahu has been sidling up to Bad Vlad who looks like he/Russia will be providing cover and protection for a colossal Israeli developed (along with Texas Noble Energy) natural gas field off the Israeli coast. The Israelis don't want to spend billions on natgas infrastructure then have it under constant rocket and missile bombardment by psychos of the Hamas and Hezbollah persuasions.
    So it looks like Israel will under the developing Middle Eastern Pax Russ. Power abhors vacuums, so while Obama has been shrinking the US role there, Bad Vlad is expanding Russia's in Syria, Iran, Israel and so on.

    Hope so. Supporting the zionist state in Palestine makes the US a target. Let someone else pay for its crimes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. Vendetta says:
    @Eustace Tilley (not)
    "...psychos of the Hamas and Hezbollah persuasions", my well-circumcised friend?

    Nazrallah is the shrewdest, most courageous, and (not incidentally) most successful leader in the Near East.

    Hamas are a gang of worthless psychopaths, but Hezbollah is a real different story. Never found stories about Hezbollah beheading their enemies or stabbing old ladies on the street. Nasrallah is deeply charismatic and clever, and if nothing else you have to respect them for their fighting skills. Best infantry in the Arab world.

    Read More
    • Replies: @L.K
    VENDETTA wrote;
    "Hamas are a gang of worthless psychopaths".

    One does not have to be a fan of Hamas to understand that your statement is nonsense.

    - It's Israel, almost everytime, which causes the 'wars' in Gaza, does not negotiage in good faith and does not want a 2 state solution. Not Hamas.

    The book 'Method and Madness: The Hidden Story of Israel’s Assaults on Gaza', by Norman G. Finkelstein, a well known Jewish scholar (New York and London: OR Books, 2014), addresses these matters.


    Finkelstein writes in the preface that ‘a trio of themes form the connective tissue of the book’s narrative’. First, each attack on Gaza was preceded by a pattern of deliberate Israeli provocations leading to Hamas retaliation by means of largely ineffectual rockets, which Israel then exploited as a pretext. Second, in each case, Israel managed to evade accountability from the international community. Third, each massacre ended in a stalemate and the continuation of the siege of Gaza.

    Israel’s motivations have also remained consistent. Whereas Israel presents its offensives as reluctant responses to Palestinian aggression, the truth, Finkelstein argues, is precisely the opposite. Israel’s provocations and attacks typically follow Palestinian ‘peace offensives’—peace overtures that undermine Israel’s pretexts for rejecting a two-state solution and hence threaten it with the prospect of having to give up land in the West Bank. To forestall an unwelcome peace, Israel instigates a war and brands the Palestinians as ‘terrorists’ with whom no peace can be made. Finkelstein traces this pattern back to the 1982 war on Lebanon and takes the phrase ‘peace offensive’ from an Israeli analyst writing at the time. A second consistent objective behind Israel’s attacks on Gaza is to restore what Israel calls its ‘deterrence capability’ as the dominant power in the region. Finkelstein traces this policy back to the Six Day War. But whereas in 1967 Israel established deterrence by defeating the Arab world’s major military power, the enfeebled Israeli military of today must resort to Gaza as a demonstrative punching bag in lieu of taking on a more formidable enemy, such as Hezbollah.

     

    But the Palestinian militants at Gaza in 2014(hamas & co) gave the israelis a huge headache... over several days of ground combat, and without any real deep penetrations and occupation attempts, over 530 israeli soldiers were KIA or WIA. The israeli military planners objected deeper thrusts into Gaza on the grounds they'd suffer thousands of casualties.
    Former terrorist and israeli soldier turned zio light/"peace" activist, Uri Avnery, recognized the palestinians fought bravely and skillfully.

    Uri avnery wrote, for example;

    "AFTER 29 DAYS of fighting (until now), who has won?
    It is, of course, much too early to draw final conclusions. The ceasefire has blown up. It will take months and years to sum up all the consequences. But Israeli popular wisdom has already drawn its own conclusions: it is a draw.
    [...]
    WHEN A guerrilla organization with at most 10,000 fighters achieves a draw with one of the mightiest armies in the world, equipped with the most ultra-modern weapons, that is by itself a kind of victory.
    Hamas has not only shown a lot of courage during the fighting, but also surprising ingenuity in preparing for this campaign. It is still standing upright.
    ...
    The Israeli army, on the other hand, has shown very little imagination. It was quite unprepared for the maze of tunnels.
    ...
    Indeed, as a commentator dared to write, the army has become a heavy, cumbersome, conservative machine.[...]. Its doctrine was, in essence, to pound the civilian population into submission, causing as much killing and destruction as possible, so as to deter the "resistance" as much and as long as possible. In Israel, the terrible pictures of death and destruction did not evoke compassion. On the contrary. People were proud of it."
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. Vendetta says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    If the Israelis were smart they would trade the occupied territories for the Golan Heights whilst the going was good.
     
    Black Gold Under the Golan

    Dick Cheney is an investor in the Texas business that formed an Israeli subsidiary to exploit the shale oil find in Golan.

    Rocket targets in the Golan Heights, an investment plan that’s sure to pay off.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. {If the Israelis were smart they would trade the occupied territories for the Golan Heights whilst the going was good.}

    If people were smart, would not write such a dumb line. Golan Heights is NOT part of the occupied land of Palestine (Israel) to ‘trade’ with another occupied piece of land. It has been taken by terrorism and aggression.

    These people are part of Khazar tribe and have NO relations with Palestine, Hebrew people of the region and the ME. They adapted Judaism in 9th century and lived around the black sea. They are COLONISTS at the best. Nathan Rothschild around 1911 told the world that Rothschild family controls the British Empire. He said:
    {I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.}

    Stealing of Palestinian land achieved using $$$ of Jewish plutocracy, Rothschild family, who controlled the British Empire.

    In his diary, Theodor Herzl, describes submitting his draft proposals to the Rothschild Family Council, noting: “I bring to the Rothschilds and the big Jews their historical mission. I shall welcome all men of goodwill — we must be united — and crush all those of bad.”
    Theodor Herzl’s eyes were on Palestine. Thus, he used the wealth of the Jewish plutocracy to buy Abdulhamid II, the Ottoman ruler with little success.
    Modern Jewish immigration into Palestine began in 1882. The Ottoman Government was aware of this influx from the outset, and decided to oppose Jewish immigration to Palestine in 1881, some months before the increased flow of Jews got under way. There was a great pressure from the European on Ottoman Empire to accept Jews to settle on the east bank of the River Jordan, because neither the ruler nor the people of the empire desired to have Jews in their land. Since Abdulhamid did not accept, then HE WAS OVERTHROWN by the Zionist Jews and their stooges in Europe.
    In November 1881, in response to the Anglo-German group’s approach, the Ottoman Government announced that: “Jewish immigrants will be able to settle as scattered groups throughout the Ottoman Empire, excluding PALESTINE.” *
    * Neville J. Mandel, “The Arabs and Zionism”, 1980

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  38. Sam Shama says:

    Hello friends:
    Thought I ought to drop a word or two in the mix, having just returned from a work trip in Asia and the ME.

    The mood, as far as I could discern in Asia and India is really one of indifference to the social conditions arising from hostilities the ME. Most of the people I spoke with were familiar with the population movements towards Europe, but remain only mildly interested in the matter. They are however very much in the grip of two things: rising Nationalism and a drive towards economic expansion nary a thought devoted to oppression or exploitation.

    In the Gulf somewhat similarly, while people are more intimately familiar with the Syrian theatre and the unending, pathetic, conditions afflicted upon the Pals, there is a sense of fatigue and even a deliberate indifference to the matter, and at the worst a growing support for Saudi actions and those of Netanyahu! (I was really flabbergasted at this – although mind you, these are the gulf Arabs, never particularly interested in very much, save the price of oil)

    So I come back to State-side, with an odd feeling that the world is not what I had thought it would be, east of our own bearings.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62
    Welcome back, Sam. In your absence, I posed a few questions in your direction. Look forward to your responses.

    PS - to expedite the process, you could quickly peruse my archive and do a "Sam" or "SS" search.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. Rurik says:
    @Sherman
    The "Moshe Yatom" story is a discredited hoax you imbecile. There was never such a person.

    If he was indeed such a "prominent Israeli psychiatrist" his name would have appeared outside of fringe anti-Israel websites when he is Googled.

    If you choose to be an anti-Semite at least be a competent one.

    http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Moshe-Yatom/1503303119

    https://rehmat2.wordpress.com/2010/07/08/study-is-mental-illness-a-jewish-disease/

    OK general, well it appears I may have been duped. Won’t be the first time.

    However, if he did or didn’t drive some people to suicide with his playing fast and loose with the truth and his rapid and infamous contempt for the sanctity of human life and dignity of all human beings, regardless of their religion or race, it still has little to do with the facts that we all agree on. He is leading a movement to genocide the rightful and legal owners of the land of Palestine by a campaign of mass-murder and human rights atrocities. His IDF shoots teenagers for target practice when they aren’t running over idealistic American young women with bulldozers who foolishly believe that no man would do such a thing. That poor girl was wrong. We should have all warned her.

    And for the record, general, I’m no more an anti-Semite than I am an anti-Zionist. I believe that all peoples have a right to self-determination. Jews too. I just don’t believe that Jewish self-determination should be achieved by genociding another people off the planet. It creates the Jewish state on a foundation of illegitimacy and the blood of innocents. Perhaps that’s what N. America was built on too, but today, and especially after humanities’ moral maturity following the Holocaust, we ought to know better now. Especially the Jews.

    So yes, I do offer a critique of Zionism as it’s being foisted today, and especially as I’m being forced with my tax dollars and the collaboration of my government at every level of this terrible crime today to be complicit with it. ‘It’ being the murder and theft and humiliation of an entire people for the crime of existing on land that is coveted by others. It’s monstrous and a blight on the human race that it is tolerated, let alone funded and praised.

    So, on that day that the nobility that lingers in the Jewish soul finds its voice, I’ll be there standing strong and proud with my brothers and sisters of the human race. Until that day, as long as psychopaths torment helpless people for the fun and cruelty of it all, I’ll condemn it. And with your help, pointing out when I’m in error, together we’ll get to the truth of it all.

    So thank you general. I’m grateful for your careful vetting of the accuracy of what’s said here, and especially when I’m in error somehow. That is the last thing I want- quite the contrary- and one of the things I love about this place.

    Salaam Alaikum

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    Rurik,

    Your comment to Sherman was generous and wise.

    But this statement--

    today, and especially after humanities’ moral maturity following the Holocaust, we ought to know better now. Especially the Jews.
     
    There is nothing that provides more convincing evidence that the holocaust narrative is, shall we say exaggerated in the extreme than the behavior of the Allies and "especially the Jews" in the aftermath of the wars in Europe and the brutality they have exhibited that has only increased over the years.

    The crescendo of chaos that we are witnessing does not signal moral maturity. Rather, it suggests in terms almost impossible to refute that there was something radically distorted in the these actors from the get-go.

    Netanyahu does not have to make ludicrous statements about the Mufti to cast doubt on the credibility of the dogmatized holocaust narrative; his behavior, cut from the same whole cloth as his zionist forebears, and replicated in his colleagues as well as the population he leads, demonstrates in real-time that psychopathology expressed in brutality, not moral maturity, is the dominant feature of the zionist value set.

    I shuddered to hear Bibi state that "the American people and Israelis share values . . ."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. geokat62 says:
    @Sam Shama
    Hello friends:
    Thought I ought to drop a word or two in the mix, having just returned from a work trip in Asia and the ME.

    The mood, as far as I could discern in Asia and India is really one of indifference to the social conditions arising from hostilities the ME. Most of the people I spoke with were familiar with the population movements towards Europe, but remain only mildly interested in the matter. They are however very much in the grip of two things: rising Nationalism and a drive towards economic expansion nary a thought devoted to oppression or exploitation.

    In the Gulf somewhat similarly, while people are more intimately familiar with the Syrian theatre and the unending, pathetic, conditions afflicted upon the Pals, there is a sense of fatigue and even a deliberate indifference to the matter, and at the worst a growing support for Saudi actions and those of Netanyahu! (I was really flabbergasted at this - although mind you, these are the gulf Arabs, never particularly interested in very much, save the price of oil)

    So I come back to State-side, with an odd feeling that the world is not what I had thought it would be, east of our own bearings.

    Welcome back, Sam. In your absence, I posed a few questions in your direction. Look forward to your responses.

    PS – to expedite the process, you could quickly peruse my archive and do a “Sam” or “SS” search.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    thanks Geo,

    Will read and reply soon.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. annamaria says:
    @Sherman
    International opinion is turning but it seems to be turning in favor of Israel.

    China and India are tripping over each other to do business in Israel.

    Today London Mayor Boris Johnson - who has an eye on becoming PM some day - is in Israel and praising the country.

    Well:
    “China and Iran’s New Love Affair?” http://nationalinterest.org/feature/china-irans-new-love-affair-13434
    “India and Iran: Challenges and Opportunity” http://thediplomat.com/2015/09/india-iran-relations-challenges-and-opportunity/
    The most important factor explaining the US/UK politicians’ loudly-proclaimed love for Israel is money. The smothering stench of corruption.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ivan
    Right on the mark annamarina. Much the world's hardware is made in China, they also do cut rate software. India is not very far behind in manufacturing and software either. Yet to hear the Israeli partisans tell it, one would think that without them nothing happens.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. @Mark Green
    Numerous American Presidents since Gerald Ford have complained about Israel's 'stranglehold' on Washington. Even Truman--who unhesitatingly recognized the new Jewish state in 1948--deeply resented the Zionist lobby, writing in his diary that the implacable friends of Israel are "very, very selfish". This unrelenting political distortion now affects all of Western civilization.

    With that in mind, the case can be made that it is Israel--not the US--that has become the world's foremost superpower.

    After all, not only do Israelis and their minions shape all Mideast policies (and wars) coming out of Washington, but they enjoy undue influence in London, Paris, Frankfurt, Brussels, NY/Wall St., the Fed, Hollywood and even our courts. The situation is not good. Not by any means.

    What's worse, judging by the rhetoric and pledges of every wannabe US presidential candidate, this undiagnosed malignancy is going to metastasize further before it's recognized for what it is.

    Actually, Truman recognized the State of Israel and specifically did not want to recognize it as the “Jewish State”.

    http://www.trumanlibrary.org/exhibit_documents/index.php?tldate=1948-05-14&groupid=3429&pagenumber=1&collectionid=ROIexhibit

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. Sherman says:

    If the Jews are “genociding” another people off the planet they’re not doing a very efficient job, are they?

    The Arab populations of Israel, the WB and Gaza have experienced explosive growth over the past few decades.

    In fact, these areas have experienced substantial Arab growth since Jews brought prosperity to the land and Arabs from surrounding countries started moving there.

    If the Israelis are engaged in “genocide” it’s the most incompetent genocide in history.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    If the Jews are “genociding” another people off the planet they’re not doing a very efficient job, are they?
     
    sounds almost like you're complaining

    as for the genocide, this is what people are talking about

    http://ifamericansknew.org/images/FourMaps.jpg

    also the way the Palestinians jammed into those open air prisons are treated

    it's an abomination to treat people this way. But you have to have a soul to understand that other people have souls too
    , @Art
    "If the Israelis are engaged in “genocide” it’s the most incompetent genocide in history."

    Hi Sherm,

    Poor you - a victim again. Those darn babies.

    But never fear - your Mufti Netanyahu has big plans. You can count on Obama backing his Big Jew diabolical strategy for the future of the Palestinian people.

    Art
    , @Clyde

    If the Israelis are engaged in “genocide” it’s the most incompetent genocide in history.
     
    Muslims are very competent genociders. For an example today just look at what ISIS is doing to Shiites, Christians and Yazidi. But never a peep here from our Israel-centric commenters here. Israel kills on the retail level (in self defense) while the Muslims do it to each other (Shiite vs Sunni) on the wholesale level. The Muslims wish they could kill off Israeli Jews on the wholesale level but the IDF is too strong.

    In the past the Islamics killed 80 million Hindus over a few centuries when conquering parts of India. Every Muslim from that area has Hindu ancestors if you can go back far enough.
    There is no imperialism like Islamic imperialism and that's why they covet the land that Jews live on in Israel. A few years back Osama Bin Laden was bellyaching about the Spanish Reconquista. How the Christians had taken back their lands from the Muslim imperialists. This runs against Islamic doctrine (such that it is), that once a land has gone Muslim it must never be permitted to revert back to non-Muslim rule. Israel is a thorn in their side for this same reason.

    Through the ages there has been no imperialism like Islamic imperialism. The heart plucking Aztecs were chumps compared to the Islamic death toll. The peoples Islam has conquered and destroyed through the ages.

    When Obama studied Koran in Indonesia this consisted of him mindless memorizing then reciting the Koran in Arabic. Why? Because Arab imperialism is at the center of Islamic imperialism. In fact Islam got its start as a convenient fairy tale vehicle for Arab conquest/killings/forced conversions of their pagan and Christian neighbors. The Middle East was mostly Christian by the time Muhammad's armies rolled out in 622. Islamic imperialism destroyed all this.


    The military career of Muhammad lasted for the final ten years of his life when he served as the leader of the ummah at Medina. They also sent out raiding parties against Arabic-speaking communities ruled under the Roman Empire. Muhammad was believed by the Muslims to be divinely chosen to spread Islam in world, and Muhammad ultimately permitted warfare as one aspect of this struggle.[1] After initially refusing to accede to requests by his followers to fight the Meccans for continued persecution and provocation, he eventually proclaimed the revelations of the Quran:

    "Permission to fight is given to those who are fought against because they have been wronged -truly Allah has the power to come to their support- those who were expelled from their homes without any right, merely for saying, 'Our Lord is Allah'..." (Quran, 22:39-40)"
     

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. @Junior

    Obama is as anti-Semitic as Louis Farrakhan who he interacted with while living in Chicago.
     
    What makes you say that he's anti-Semitic, Clyde?

    "I decry racism and anti-Semitism in every form and strongly condemn the anti-Semitic statements made by Minister Farrakhan. I assume that Trumpet magazine made its own decision to honor Farrakhan based on his efforts to rehabilitate ex-offenders, but it is not a decision with which I agree." - Sen. Barack Obama (Jan. 15, 2008)

    http://mediamatters.org/research/2008/02/27/russert-persisted-in-questioning-obama-on-farra/142695

    Not only is Obama not anti-Semitic, he was essentially put in power by the American zionists like the Pritzkers and Crowns and is their obedient puppet. Penny Pritzker, one of the worst fraudsters in the recent financial crisis and a strong opponent of unions, didn’t get appointed to head the Dept. of Commerce because of her progressive views.

    Abner Mikva, the former Jewish Chicago congressman, federal judge and White House counsel to President Bill Clinton said during Obama’s 2008 campaign:

    “I think when this is all over, people are going to say that Barack Obama is the first Jewish president,”

    Some of my earliest and most ardent supporters came from the Jewish community in Chicago,” Obama told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency in 2004, The Chicago Jewish News, October 24, 2008

    Comcast (owned by uber zionists) was among the top backers of Barack Obama’s presidential runs, with Comcast vice president David Cohen raising over $2.2 million from 2007 to 2012.

    I believe part of the reason for Netanyahoo’s disdain for Obama is that he feels superior to the “Schwartza” and feels insulted that Obama doesn’t immediately bend to his will. It’s well known that with the rise of racism and Israeli supremacism that darks skinned people are treated much like they were in Alabama in the 1950′s or very much worse.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. @Rurik

    Bibi is quite likely clinically insane.
     
    Moshe Yatom, a prominent Israeli psychiatrist who successfully cured the most extreme forms of mental illness throughout a distinguished career, was found dead at his home in Tel Aviv yesterday from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound. A suicide note at his side explained that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been his patient for the last nine years, had “sucked the life right out of me.”

    “I can’t take it anymore,” wrote Yatom. “Robbery is redemption, apartheid is freedom, peace activists are terrorists, murder is self-defense, piracy is legality, Palestinians are Jordanians, annexation is liberation, there’s no end to his contradictions. Freud promised rationality would reign in the instinctual passions, but he never met Bibi Netanyahu. This guy would say Gandhi invented brass knuckes.”

    http://gauhar.com/?p=626

    Psychiatrists are familiar with the human tendency to massage the truth to avoid confronting emotionally troubling material, but Yatom was apparently stunned at what he called the “waterfall of lies” gushing from his most illustrious patient. His personal diary details the steady disintegration of his once invincible personality under the barrage of self-serving rationalizations put forth by Netanyahu.

    >>><<<

    The first of Yatom’s strokes occurred when Netanyahu offered his opinion that the 911 attacks on Washington and New York “were good.” The second followed a session in which Netanyahu insisted that Iran and Nazi Germany were identical. And the third occurred after the Prime Minister declared Iran’s nuclear energy program was a “flying gas chamber,” and that all Jews everywhere “lived permanently in Auschwitz.” Yatom’s efforts to calm Netanyahu’s hysteria were extremely taxing emotionally and routinely ended in failure. “The alibi is always the same with him,” complained another diary entry. “The Jews are on the verge of annihilation at the hands of the racist goyim and the only way to save the day is to carry out one final massacre.”


    there's more there at the link

    but is isn't just Bibi. He is a representation of something gone terribly wrong with the megalomaniacal psychopathic id of the Zionist. Where killing teenagers willy-nilly to harvest their organs is considered a ho hum no-brainer. Just like the buying and selling of European young women smuggled in as abject sex slaves, raped, beaten, drugged and literally bought and sold naked on the block as grotesquely as any negro slave in 17th century America. This stuff is all taken for granted by these people, who bring comfy chairs and sofas to watch the shelling of Gaza from the hill tops. Or congratulating their brave comrades in arms as they take pot shots at children playing on rooftops.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUibXSgILv0

    it isn't just Bibi who's insane

    Even as the president of the United States, Barack Also-insane Obama, damned Palestinians and gave Bibi the Insane Netanyahu yet more weapons to kill Palestinians (and Iranians), one mile away, at the Palestine Center, a crowded theater watched and listened as Mads Gilbert displayed photos and played the sounds of children screaming as their shattered bodies were attempted to be repaired by Dr. Gilbert and his fellows after IDF had shattered them with DIME and other hi-tech weapons.

    Night in Gaza

    Chris Hedges has written of the many creative uses Israelis make of the billions of dollars in weaponry that the American people supply to that pariah state:

    A Gaza Diary, by Chris Hedges It is still. The camp waits, as if holding its breath. And then, out of the dry furnace air, a disembodied voice crackles over a loudspeaker.

    “Come on, dogs,” the voice booms in Arabic. “Where are all the dogs of Khan Younis? Come! Come!”

    I stand up. I walk outside the hut. The invective continues to spew: “Son of a bitch!” “Son of a whore!” “Your mother’s cunt!”

    The boys dart in small packs up the sloping dunes to the electric fence that separates the camp from the Jewish settlement. They lob rocks toward two armored jeeps parked on top of the dune and mounted with loudspeakers. Three ambulances line the road below the dunes in anticipation of what is to come.

    A percussion grenade explodes. The boys, most no more than ten or eleven years old, scatter, running clumsily across the heavy sand. They descend out of sight behind a sandbank in front of me. There are no sounds of gunfire. The soldiers shoot with silencers. The bullets from the M-16 rifles tumble end over end through the children’s slight bodies. Later, in the hospital, I will see the destruction: the stomachs ripped out, the gaping holes in limbs and torsos.

    Yesterday at this spot the Israelis shot eight young men, six of whom were under the age of eighteen. One was twelve. This afternoon they kill an eleven-year-old boy, Ali Murad, and seriously wound four more, three of whom are under eighteen. Children have been shot in other conflicts I have covered—death squads gunned them down in El Salvador and Guatemala, mothers with infants were lined up and massacred in Algeria, and Serb snipers put children in their sights and watched them crumple onto the pavement in Sarajevo—but I have never before watched soldiers entice children like mice into a trap and murder them for sport.

    —————-

    All governments lie, as I.F. Stone pointed out, including Israel and Hamas. But Israel engages in the kinds of jaw-dropping lies that characterize despotic and totalitarian regimes. It does not deform the truth; it inverts it. It routinely paints a picture for the outside world that is diametrically opposed to reality. And all of us reporters who have covered the occupied territories have run into Israel’s Alice-in-Wonderland narratives, which we dutifully insert into our stories—required under the rules of American journalism—although we know they are untrue.

    I saw small boys baited and killed by Israeli soldiers in the Gaza refugee camp of Khan Younis. The soldiers swore at the boys in Arabic over the loudspeakers of their armored jeep. The boys, about 10 years old, then threw stones at an Israeli vehicle and the soldiers opened fire, killing some, wounding others. I was present more than once as Israeli troops drew out and shot Palestinian children in this way. Such incidents, in the Israeli lexicon, become children caught in crossfire. I was in Gaza when F-16 attack jets dropped 1,000-pound iron fragmentation bombs on overcrowded hovels in Gaza City. I saw the corpses of the victims, including children. This became a surgical strike on a bomb-making factory. I have watched Israel demolish homes and entire apartment blocks to create wide buffer zones between the Palestinians and the Israeli troops that ring Gaza. I have interviewed the destitute and homeless families, some camped out in crude shelters erected in the rubble. The destruction becomes the demolition of the homes of terrorists. I have stood in the remains of schools—Israel struck two United Nations schools in the last six days, causing at least 10 fatalities at one in Rafah on Sunday and at least 19 at one in the Jebaliya refugee camp Wednesday—as well as medical clinics and mosques. I have heard Israel claim that errant rockets or mortar fire from the Palestinians caused these and other deaths, or that the attacked spots were being used as arms depots or launching sites. I, along with every other reporter I know who has worked in Gaza, have never seen any evidence that Hamas uses civilians as “human shields.”

    There is a perverted logic to Israel’s repeated use of the Big Lie—Große Lüge—the lie favored by tyrants from Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin to Saddam Hussein. The Big Lie feeds the two reactions Israel seeks to elicit—racism among its supporters and terror among its victims.

    By painting a picture of an army that never attacks civilians, that indeed goes out of its way to protect them, the Big Lie says Israelis are civilized and humane, and their Palestinian opponents are inhuman monsters. The Big Lie serves the idea that the slaughter in Gaza is a clash of civilizations, a war between democracy, decency and honor on one side and Islamic barbarism on the other. And in the uncommon cases when news of atrocities penetrates to the wider public, Israel blames the destruction and casualties on Hamas. Why Israel Lies,” by Chris Hedges

    As commented and linked elsewhere, Kathy Peiss reported with enormous satisfaction that her uncle was among those Jews and other WWII victors who stole, removed, and destroyed books and documents of Nazi racism. The world can never know the truth of that era; as Peiss revealed, the chain-of-evidence has been tainted. Nothing that any Jewish person or Allied victor says can be believed.

    But this time around, the world is watching in real-time, bearing witness, and compiling evidence dossiers, as American and Israeli leaders, and the many American, Jewish and Israeli people who support them, carry on committing crimes against humanity.

    They think they act with impunity.

    Every gutter-level addict and every habitual criminal thinks he acts with impunity.

    But there are witnesses to these crimes against humanity.

    Moreover, there is one certainty in this life: addicts, and criminals, will hit the wall.

    The only question is how many lives will be destroyed until that happens.

    — ah — another question: What can those who witness this destructive behavior do to hasten the moment when those criminals hit the wall?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. Rehmat says:

    United States has long become a colony of the Zionist regime. Netanyahu has come to collect increased taxes to the tune of $5 billion per year in military aid from his American subjects. Barack Obama promised Netanyahu that a few months ago.

    Netanyahu has the reputation of calling everyone “antisemite”, even G-d and Bible.

    http://rehmat1.com/2015/11/10/netanyahu-obama-and-bible-hate-jews/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  47. @Rurik
    http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Moshe-Yatom/1503303119

    https://rehmat2.wordpress.com/2010/07/08/study-is-mental-illness-a-jewish-disease/

    OK general, well it appears I may have been duped. Won't be the first time.

    However, if he did or didn't drive some people to suicide with his playing fast and loose with the truth and his rapid and infamous contempt for the sanctity of human life and dignity of all human beings, regardless of their religion or race, it still has little to do with the facts that we all agree on. He is leading a movement to genocide the rightful and legal owners of the land of Palestine by a campaign of mass-murder and human rights atrocities. His IDF shoots teenagers for target practice when they aren't running over idealistic American young women with bulldozers who foolishly believe that no man would do such a thing. That poor girl was wrong. We should have all warned her.

    And for the record, general, I'm no more an anti-Semite than I am an anti-Zionist. I believe that all peoples have a right to self-determination. Jews too. I just don't believe that Jewish self-determination should be achieved by genociding another people off the planet. It creates the Jewish state on a foundation of illegitimacy and the blood of innocents. Perhaps that's what N. America was built on too, but today, and especially after humanities' moral maturity following the Holocaust, we ought to know better now. Especially the Jews.

    So yes, I do offer a critique of Zionism as it's being foisted today, and especially as I'm being forced with my tax dollars and the collaboration of my government at every level of this terrible crime today to be complicit with it. 'It' being the murder and theft and humiliation of an entire people for the crime of existing on land that is coveted by others. It's monstrous and a blight on the human race that it is tolerated, let alone funded and praised.

    So, on that day that the nobility that lingers in the Jewish soul finds its voice, I'll be there standing strong and proud with my brothers and sisters of the human race. Until that day, as long as psychopaths torment helpless people for the fun and cruelty of it all, I'll condemn it. And with your help, pointing out when I'm in error, together we'll get to the truth of it all.

    So thank you general. I'm grateful for your careful vetting of the accuracy of what's said here, and especially when I'm in error somehow. That is the last thing I want- quite the contrary- and one of the things I love about this place.

    Salaam Alaikum

    Rurik,

    Your comment to Sherman was generous and wise.

    But this statement–

    today, and especially after humanities’ moral maturity following the Holocaust, we ought to know better now. Especially the Jews.

    There is nothing that provides more convincing evidence that the holocaust narrative is, shall we say exaggerated in the extreme than the behavior of the Allies and “especially the Jews” in the aftermath of the wars in Europe and the brutality they have exhibited that has only increased over the years.

    The crescendo of chaos that we are witnessing does not signal moral maturity. Rather, it suggests in terms almost impossible to refute that there was something radically distorted in the these actors from the get-go.

    Netanyahu does not have to make ludicrous statements about the Mufti to cast doubt on the credibility of the dogmatized holocaust narrative; his behavior, cut from the same whole cloth as his zionist forebears, and replicated in his colleagues as well as the population he leads, demonstrates in real-time that psychopathology expressed in brutality, not moral maturity, is the dominant feature of the zionist value set.

    I shuddered to hear Bibi state that “the American people and Israelis share values . . .”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik
    I share your skepticism about the details of the Holocaust. It happened, but to what degree and if there were actually genocidal gas chambers and an official agenda of a so-called 'final solution' is fodder for debate. But we've all grown up with the tales and grainy images of emaciated bodies and open pit graves. It's part of our collective sub-conscious, and there is a lesson it it, regardless of the crass and by now tiresome finger pointing, and that is that man can often be unimaginably cruel to man, (and women and child), and that we should all make an effort to listen to our better angels. That's what I come away from the Holocaust with. Not that Germans are all evil and that Jews are eternal victims- like they'd have us all knee-jerk, genuflect like Pavlovian dogs to that narrative. But rather that we humans can act like demons to each other, and that we shouldn't. Or something like that. I would like to hope that our moral maturity is somewhere in that lesson.

    If we didn't learn it from the barbarism of WWII, then perhaps we'll never learn it. Certainly the evidence of Gaza and Syria and Libya and Odessa and Gitmo and so many other places suggest we're beyond redemption. But I hope not. I hope..
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. @Frankie P
    Philip,

    Perhaps it's time to admit that the US is not just a big idiot being led about by the Israelis and their fifth column in the US; the US is completely complicit in all the mess in the Middle East, Ukraine, etc. The majority of Americans seem to side with the apartheid state in the Levant, and I see NO SIGN of a politician emerging who will take on the Lobby. It's time to start rooting for the voices of reason, you know, the ones Asshat Ashton Carter says pose strategic threats. Time to drop the nostalgic longing for the way we were and face the ugly present and potentially nightmarish future. All brought to you by your elected representatives in Washington. Either that, or put down your pen and pick up a gun. Time to water that tree again.

    Perhaps it’s time to admit that the US is not just a big idiot being led about by the Israelis and their fifth column in the US; the US is completely complicit in all the mess in the Middle East, Ukraine, etc. The majority of Americans seem to side with the apartheid state in the Levant, and I see NO SIGN of a politician emerging who will take on the Lobby

    Thank you! Finally one of you retards admits the truth. The American people do not give a shit about what happens to the Palestinians and there is nothing you can do to save them.

    Please educate your fellow retarded Paleocons so the rest of us don’t need to keep listening to their endless complaining on the internet.

    If it makes you feel any better, Israel won’t be an apartheid state much longer, as soon the Palestinians will all be dead or expelled. Enjoy them while they last.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    If it makes you feel any better, Israel won’t be an apartheid state much longer, as soon the Palestinians will all be dead or expelled. Enjoy them while they last.
     
    I'd like to know how well your statement would go over if we simply replaced two words in it:

    If it makes you feel any better, Deutschland won’t be an apartheid state much longer, as soon the Jews will all be dead or expelled. Enjoy them while they last.
     
    , @MarkinLA
    Thank you! Finally one of you retards admits the truth. The American people do not give a shit about what happens to the Israelis or Palestinians and want F-all to do with either of them.

    There FIFY.
    , @schmenz
    I congratulate you, Greasy. For cold-hearted, reptilian, merciless cynicism you have no peer. The other Israeli cheerleaders here cannot hold a candle to you.

    I want to go out and vomit.
    , @bunga
    You will be listening for a long time unfortunately .
    Cowards ,incompetent job seekers, people coveting for positions do all the time what Neera Tanden or whole CAP just did. Education is way down the list of priority ,when the job you wanted to have ,could be had only after gutting reason ,expressing internalized fear with respect ,and rigging the debates through rigged questions ,screening attendees, shutting audience and claiming how successful the show was in merit and how forceful was the conviction . When there is no job to have ,you still want to hang around for some emotional crumbs after long years of browbeating by the rascals masquerading as national leader . That way you tell the world : you are still relevant .You still have services to offer to the rascals.


    http://mondoweiss.net/2015/11/netanyahu-conversation-twilight
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Sam Shama says:
    @geokat62
    Welcome back, Sam. In your absence, I posed a few questions in your direction. Look forward to your responses.

    PS - to expedite the process, you could quickly peruse my archive and do a "Sam" or "SS" search.

    thanks Geo,

    Will read and reply soon.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. geokat62 says:
    @Greasy William

    Perhaps it’s time to admit that the US is not just a big idiot being led about by the Israelis and their fifth column in the US; the US is completely complicit in all the mess in the Middle East, Ukraine, etc. The majority of Americans seem to side with the apartheid state in the Levant, and I see NO SIGN of a politician emerging who will take on the Lobby
     
    Thank you! Finally one of you retards admits the truth. The American people do not give a shit about what happens to the Palestinians and there is nothing you can do to save them.

    Please educate your fellow retarded Paleocons so the rest of us don't need to keep listening to their endless complaining on the internet.


    If it makes you feel any better, Israel won't be an apartheid state much longer, as soon the Palestinians will all be dead or expelled. Enjoy them while they last.

    If it makes you feel any better, Israel won’t be an apartheid state much longer, as soon the Palestinians will all be dead or expelled. Enjoy them while they last.

    I’d like to know how well your statement would go over if we simply replaced two words in it:

    If it makes you feel any better, Deutschland won’t be an apartheid state much longer, as soon the Jews will all be dead or expelled. Enjoy them while they last.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. Ironic that a cosmetics mogul should be putting lipstick on Likud pork. Somehow it just doesn’t seem kosher. Congrats on the NYT op-ed by the way, even though it wasn’t quite like what’s here. Some good comments in response there, though.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Philip Giraldi
    Thanks Fran!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. @Fran Macadam
    Ironic that a cosmetics mogul should be putting lipstick on Likud pork. Somehow it just doesn't seem kosher. Congrats on the NYT op-ed by the way, even though it wasn't quite like what's here. Some good comments in response there, though.

    Thanks Fran!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Donald says:

    Just can’t resist this one ……

    Q: What should have Obama told Bibi?
    A: You’re FIRED!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  54. Art says:

    I wanted to vomit when Mufti Netanyahu said that he wanted a two state solution and peace with the Palestinians at the WH yesterday. He sullied the whole world with that lie. Obama was like a zombie.

    Fox-n-Krauthammer must have put that giant lie on air fifty times.

    The control of the Jews over our country is mind numbing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    Want to wretch a little more? C-SPAN showed Bibi live from CAP. Hillary's harlot Neera Tanden was predictably lame with the soft-balls, passing on the lies. Pathetic.

    http://www.c-span.org/video/?400521-1/conversation-israeli-prime-minister-benjamin-netanyahu

    (BTW, is this where you get your big Jew, little Jew? "...Theodor Herzl, describes submitting his draft proposals to the Rothschild Family Council, noting: “I bring to the Rothschilds and the big Jews their historical mission...")
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. @Clyde

    Nazrallah is the shrewdest, most courageous, and (not incidentally) most successful leader in the Near East.
     
    If he's so smart how come his people walk around in rags same as before there ever was an Israel? All he offers them is war to take their minds off their hungry bellies and their children needing medicines. Allah is a war god. He is bored by peace so the Shiites will duke it out with the Sunnis when there is no one else around around. Now a days we have Alewites (semi-Shiite) fighting Sunni ISIS. Iran funds the Alewite regime and Gulf states fund ISIS. Everyone pitches in to back their favorite. It's much more interesting to the Islamic world this way, when they have skin in the game.
    Same way you might place a bet on a football game to make it more interesting.

    Yes, he is greatly to blame for not being able to hop on an El Al jet, address the fawning claque of the US Congress, pose for a photo op with Mr. President, and shake down the goyim for tens of billions of dollars in goyische Schuldgeld. Maybe he should hire some Western “historians” and “scholars” to write a fake Holy Book about the Shia being the Chosen People of A***h having an eternal sacred right to Lebanon. Maybe he should buy the Western Lugenpresse to tell only his side of the story.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. Rurik says:
    @Sherman
    If the Jews are "genociding" another people off the planet they're not doing a very efficient job, are they?

    The Arab populations of Israel, the WB and Gaza have experienced explosive growth over the past few decades.

    In fact, these areas have experienced substantial Arab growth since Jews brought prosperity to the land and Arabs from surrounding countries started moving there.

    If the Israelis are engaged in "genocide" it's the most incompetent genocide in history.

    If the Jews are “genociding” another people off the planet they’re not doing a very efficient job, are they?

    sounds almost like you’re complaining

    as for the genocide, this is what people are talking about

    also the way the Palestinians jammed into those open air prisons are treated

    it’s an abomination to treat people this way. But you have to have a soul to understand that other people have souls too

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. Rurik says:
    @SolontoCroesus
    Rurik,

    Your comment to Sherman was generous and wise.

    But this statement--

    today, and especially after humanities’ moral maturity following the Holocaust, we ought to know better now. Especially the Jews.
     
    There is nothing that provides more convincing evidence that the holocaust narrative is, shall we say exaggerated in the extreme than the behavior of the Allies and "especially the Jews" in the aftermath of the wars in Europe and the brutality they have exhibited that has only increased over the years.

    The crescendo of chaos that we are witnessing does not signal moral maturity. Rather, it suggests in terms almost impossible to refute that there was something radically distorted in the these actors from the get-go.

    Netanyahu does not have to make ludicrous statements about the Mufti to cast doubt on the credibility of the dogmatized holocaust narrative; his behavior, cut from the same whole cloth as his zionist forebears, and replicated in his colleagues as well as the population he leads, demonstrates in real-time that psychopathology expressed in brutality, not moral maturity, is the dominant feature of the zionist value set.

    I shuddered to hear Bibi state that "the American people and Israelis share values . . ."

    I share your skepticism about the details of the Holocaust. It happened, but to what degree and if there were actually genocidal gas chambers and an official agenda of a so-called ‘final solution’ is fodder for debate. But we’ve all grown up with the tales and grainy images of emaciated bodies and open pit graves. It’s part of our collective sub-conscious, and there is a lesson it it, regardless of the crass and by now tiresome finger pointing, and that is that man can often be unimaginably cruel to man, (and women and child), and that we should all make an effort to listen to our better angels. That’s what I come away from the Holocaust with. Not that Germans are all evil and that Jews are eternal victims- like they’d have us all knee-jerk, genuflect like Pavlovian dogs to that narrative. But rather that we humans can act like demons to each other, and that we shouldn’t. Or something like that. I would like to hope that our moral maturity is somewhere in that lesson.

    If we didn’t learn it from the barbarism of WWII, then perhaps we’ll never learn it. Certainly the evidence of Gaza and Syria and Libya and Odessa and Gitmo and so many other places suggest we’re beyond redemption. But I hope not. I hope..

    Read More
    • Replies: @L.K
    "It happened, but to what degree and if there were actually genocidal gas chambers and an official agenda of a so-called ‘final solution’ is fodder for debate."

    No, it did NOT, not as alleged.
    No, there were NO homicidal gas chambers at the camps.
    No, there was no agenda, official or otherwise, to physically exterminate the Jews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. Has anyone else noticed the approval of more settlement housing was timed to Netanyahu’s visit? Sort of like Bibi deliberately had his thumb up his butt ready to pull it out and jam it into the nose of Obama on arrival as in ‘how do you like the aroma’?

    No argument with anything you’ve noted concerning Bibi. But I think you’re far too generous to Obama. American corporate neo-colonialism is drifting towards the world being DC’s occupied west bank, with the Obama/Brennan ‘kill list Tuesdays’, where drone hits are discussed over lunch, resembles supporting occupying settlers outposts. You know, settlers named Lockheed Martin, Chevron, Raytheon and ‘friends.’ Thought I’d bring that up, sort of along the lines of people living in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones… amended to ‘let the stones fly in all directions’

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/08/22/demons-anonymous/

    ^ it’s a satire that’ll never get tired so long as Netanyahu continues his career as a failed Jewish comedian (in his present leadership iteration taking all the Israelis to hell in a hand-basket with him.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  59. Art says:
    @Sherman
    If the Jews are "genociding" another people off the planet they're not doing a very efficient job, are they?

    The Arab populations of Israel, the WB and Gaza have experienced explosive growth over the past few decades.

    In fact, these areas have experienced substantial Arab growth since Jews brought prosperity to the land and Arabs from surrounding countries started moving there.

    If the Israelis are engaged in "genocide" it's the most incompetent genocide in history.

    “If the Israelis are engaged in “genocide” it’s the most incompetent genocide in history.”

    Hi Sherm,

    Poor you – a victim again. Those darn babies.

    But never fear – your Mufti Netanyahu has big plans. You can count on Obama backing his Big Jew diabolical strategy for the future of the Palestinian people.

    Art

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. RobinG says:
    @Art
    I wanted to vomit when Mufti Netanyahu said that he wanted a two state solution and peace with the Palestinians at the WH yesterday. He sullied the whole world with that lie. Obama was like a zombie.

    Fox-n-Krauthammer must have put that giant lie on air fifty times.

    The control of the Jews over our country is mind numbing.

    Want to wretch a little more? C-SPAN showed Bibi live from CAP. Hillary’s harlot Neera Tanden was predictably lame with the soft-balls, passing on the lies. Pathetic.

    http://www.c-span.org/video/?400521-1/conversation-israeli-prime-minister-benjamin-netanyahu

    (BTW, is this where you get your big Jew, little Jew? “…Theodor Herzl, describes submitting his draft proposals to the Rothschild Family Council, noting: “I bring to the Rothschilds and the big Jews their historical mission…”)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. MarkinLA says:
    @Greasy William

    Perhaps it’s time to admit that the US is not just a big idiot being led about by the Israelis and their fifth column in the US; the US is completely complicit in all the mess in the Middle East, Ukraine, etc. The majority of Americans seem to side with the apartheid state in the Levant, and I see NO SIGN of a politician emerging who will take on the Lobby
     
    Thank you! Finally one of you retards admits the truth. The American people do not give a shit about what happens to the Palestinians and there is nothing you can do to save them.

    Please educate your fellow retarded Paleocons so the rest of us don't need to keep listening to their endless complaining on the internet.


    If it makes you feel any better, Israel won't be an apartheid state much longer, as soon the Palestinians will all be dead or expelled. Enjoy them while they last.

    Thank you! Finally one of you retards admits the truth. The American people do not give a shit about what happens to the Israelis or Palestinians and want F-all to do with either of them.

    There FIFY.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Art says:

    “(BTW, is this where you get your big Jew, little Jew? “”

    I do not remember how I started up with the “Big Jew Little Jew” theme. It was on another site some ten years ago. It could have come from Theodor Herzl – I do not know.

    Big Jew Little Jew is effective because it is so true. Within 24 hours of some event, 80% of all Jews come out with the same exact story concocted by the Big Jews. Little Jews almost always support the Big Jews.

    The Big Jews may disagree on something – it may take them 48 hours or 72 hours – but one story will win out.

    An example is the “Mufti Palestinian” lie put out by Netanyahu – most Big Jews hated it and they won out – so today NO Jew will say “Mufti.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art
    Sorry - this post is a response to a comment made by RobinG
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. Art says:
    @Art
    @RobinG

    "(BTW, is this where you get your big Jew, little Jew? “"

    I do not remember how I started up with the “Big Jew Little Jew” theme. It was on another site some ten years ago. It could have come from Theodor Herzl - I do not know.

    Big Jew Little Jew is effective because it is so true. Within 24 hours of some event, 80% of all Jews come out with the same exact story concocted by the Big Jews. Little Jews almost always support the Big Jews.

    The Big Jews may disagree on something – it may take them 48 hours or 72 hours – but one story will win out.

    An example is the “Mufti Palestinian” lie put out by Netanyahu – most Big Jews hated it and they won out – so today NO Jew will say “Mufti.”

    Sorry – this post is a response to a comment made by RobinG

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. The vomiting of the State of Israel on the people of Palestine was the greatest strategic error since WWII.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  65. @Mark Green
    Numerous American Presidents since Gerald Ford have complained about Israel's 'stranglehold' on Washington. Even Truman--who unhesitatingly recognized the new Jewish state in 1948--deeply resented the Zionist lobby, writing in his diary that the implacable friends of Israel are "very, very selfish". This unrelenting political distortion now affects all of Western civilization.

    With that in mind, the case can be made that it is Israel--not the US--that has become the world's foremost superpower.

    After all, not only do Israelis and their minions shape all Mideast policies (and wars) coming out of Washington, but they enjoy undue influence in London, Paris, Frankfurt, Brussels, NY/Wall St., the Fed, Hollywood and even our courts. The situation is not good. Not by any means.

    What's worse, judging by the rhetoric and pledges of every wannabe US presidential candidate, this undiagnosed malignancy is going to metastasize further before it's recognized for what it is.

    ” . . . Even Truman–who unhesitatingly recognized the new Jewish state in 1948–deeply resented the Zionist lobby, writing in his diary that the implacable friends of Israel are ‘very, very selfish.’”

    Truman–the failed haberdasher/”Senator from Pendergast”/-turned President–recognized Israel over the strong objections of James V. Forrestal and George C. Marshall. Oh, yeah, and also in return for $2 million in campaign contributions from pro-Zionist sources.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. L.K says:
    @Rurik
    I share your skepticism about the details of the Holocaust. It happened, but to what degree and if there were actually genocidal gas chambers and an official agenda of a so-called 'final solution' is fodder for debate. But we've all grown up with the tales and grainy images of emaciated bodies and open pit graves. It's part of our collective sub-conscious, and there is a lesson it it, regardless of the crass and by now tiresome finger pointing, and that is that man can often be unimaginably cruel to man, (and women and child), and that we should all make an effort to listen to our better angels. That's what I come away from the Holocaust with. Not that Germans are all evil and that Jews are eternal victims- like they'd have us all knee-jerk, genuflect like Pavlovian dogs to that narrative. But rather that we humans can act like demons to each other, and that we shouldn't. Or something like that. I would like to hope that our moral maturity is somewhere in that lesson.

    If we didn't learn it from the barbarism of WWII, then perhaps we'll never learn it. Certainly the evidence of Gaza and Syria and Libya and Odessa and Gitmo and so many other places suggest we're beyond redemption. But I hope not. I hope..

    “It happened, but to what degree and if there were actually genocidal gas chambers and an official agenda of a so-called ‘final solution’ is fodder for debate.”

    No, it did NOT, not as alleged.
    No, there were NO homicidal gas chambers at the camps.
    No, there was no agenda, official or otherwise, to physically exterminate the Jews.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    No, it did NOT, not as alleged.
    No, there were NO homicidal gas chambers at the camps.
    No, there was no agenda, official or otherwise, to physically exterminate the Jews.
     
    "as alleged"

    Isn't that exactly what I said?

    Jews were rounded up and put into camps, if they were suspected of being communists they were shot and likely never even made it to the camps. (personally from my pov, if they were commies, Jewish or otherwise, they deserved to be shot).

    Once in the camps they were often mistreated and from the videos of the emaciated bodies and ditches full of them, it is clear that the Holocaust was real.

    The details of which; whether or not there were homicidal gas chambers, lamp shades made from Jewish skin, soap, shrunken heads, bears and eagles used for killing, geysers of blood blasting out of the ground, lorries filled with Jewish babies that were tossed onto bomb fires, and all the rest of the hysterical lies are a blood libel they use to extort the German people specifically (and all white gentiles in general) who also suffered horribly- and the German civilians especially AFTER the war was over.

    What we know is that the Nazis did run camps for certain ethnicities including Jews, and that those Jews (and homosexuals and Gypsies and others) were often mistreated. That's what I call the Holocaust. I don't think that is disputed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Realist says:
    @Sherman
    International opinion is turning but it seems to be turning in favor of Israel.

    China and India are tripping over each other to do business in Israel.

    Today London Mayor Boris Johnson - who has an eye on becoming PM some day - is in Israel and praising the country.

    “International opinion is turning but it seems to be turning in favor of Israel.”

    In your dreams.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. L.K says:
    @Vendetta
    Hamas are a gang of worthless psychopaths, but Hezbollah is a real different story. Never found stories about Hezbollah beheading their enemies or stabbing old ladies on the street. Nasrallah is deeply charismatic and clever, and if nothing else you have to respect them for their fighting skills. Best infantry in the Arab world.

    VENDETTA wrote;
    “Hamas are a gang of worthless psychopaths”.

    One does not have to be a fan of Hamas to understand that your statement is nonsense.

    - It’s Israel, almost everytime, which causes the ‘wars’ in Gaza, does not negotiage in good faith and does not want a 2 state solution. Not Hamas.

    The book ‘Method and Madness: The Hidden Story of Israel’s Assaults on Gaza’, by Norman G. Finkelstein, a well known Jewish scholar (New York and London: OR Books, 2014), addresses these matters.

    Finkelstein writes in the preface that ‘a trio of themes form the connective tissue of the book’s narrative’. First, each attack on Gaza was preceded by a pattern of deliberate Israeli provocations leading to Hamas retaliation by means of largely ineffectual rockets, which Israel then exploited as a pretext. Second, in each case, Israel managed to evade accountability from the international community. Third, each massacre ended in a stalemate and the continuation of the siege of Gaza.

    Israel’s motivations have also remained consistent. Whereas Israel presents its offensives as reluctant responses to Palestinian aggression, the truth, Finkelstein argues, is precisely the opposite. Israel’s provocations and attacks typically follow Palestinian ‘peace offensives’—peace overtures that undermine Israel’s pretexts for rejecting a two-state solution and hence threaten it with the prospect of having to give up land in the West Bank. To forestall an unwelcome peace, Israel instigates a war and brands the Palestinians as ‘terrorists’ with whom no peace can be made. Finkelstein traces this pattern back to the 1982 war on Lebanon and takes the phrase ‘peace offensive’ from an Israeli analyst writing at the time. A second consistent objective behind Israel’s attacks on Gaza is to restore what Israel calls its ‘deterrence capability’ as the dominant power in the region. Finkelstein traces this policy back to the Six Day War. But whereas in 1967 Israel established deterrence by defeating the Arab world’s major military power, the enfeebled Israeli military of today must resort to Gaza as a demonstrative punching bag in lieu of taking on a more formidable enemy, such as Hezbollah.

    But the Palestinian militants at Gaza in 2014(hamas & co) gave the israelis a huge headache… over several days of ground combat, and without any real deep penetrations and occupation attempts, over 530 israeli soldiers were KIA or WIA. The israeli military planners objected deeper thrusts into Gaza on the grounds they’d suffer thousands of casualties.
    Former terrorist and israeli soldier turned zio light/”peace” activist, Uri Avnery, recognized the palestinians fought bravely and skillfully.

    Uri avnery wrote, for example;

    “AFTER 29 DAYS of fighting (until now), who has won?
    It is, of course, much too early to draw final conclusions. The ceasefire has blown up. It will take months and years to sum up all the consequences. But Israeli popular wisdom has already drawn its own conclusions: it is a draw.
    [...]
    WHEN A guerrilla organization with at most 10,000 fighters achieves a draw with one of the mightiest armies in the world, equipped with the most ultra-modern weapons, that is by itself a kind of victory.
    Hamas has not only shown a lot of courage during the fighting, but also surprising ingenuity in preparing for this campaign. It is still standing upright.

    The Israeli army, on the other hand, has shown very little imagination. It was quite unprepared for the maze of tunnels.

    Indeed, as a commentator dared to write, the army has become a heavy, cumbersome, conservative machine.[...]. Its doctrine was, in essence, to pound the civilian population into submission, causing as much killing and destruction as possible, so as to deter the “resistance” as much and as long as possible. In Israel, the terrible pictures of death and destruction did not evoke compassion. On the contrary. People were proud of it.”

    Read More
    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Clyde says:
    @Sherman
    If the Jews are "genociding" another people off the planet they're not doing a very efficient job, are they?

    The Arab populations of Israel, the WB and Gaza have experienced explosive growth over the past few decades.

    In fact, these areas have experienced substantial Arab growth since Jews brought prosperity to the land and Arabs from surrounding countries started moving there.

    If the Israelis are engaged in "genocide" it's the most incompetent genocide in history.

    If the Israelis are engaged in “genocide” it’s the most incompetent genocide in history.

    Muslims are very competent genociders. For an example today just look at what ISIS is doing to Shiites, Christians and Yazidi. But never a peep here from our Israel-centric commenters here. Israel kills on the retail level (in self defense) while the Muslims do it to each other (Shiite vs Sunni) on the wholesale level. The Muslims wish they could kill off Israeli Jews on the wholesale level but the IDF is too strong.

    In the past the Islamics killed 80 million Hindus over a few centuries when conquering parts of India. Every Muslim from that area has Hindu ancestors if you can go back far enough.
    There is no imperialism like Islamic imperialism and that’s why they covet the land that Jews live on in Israel. A few years back Osama Bin Laden was bellyaching about the Spanish Reconquista. How the Christians had taken back their lands from the Muslim imperialists. This runs against Islamic doctrine (such that it is), that once a land has gone Muslim it must never be permitted to revert back to non-Muslim rule. Israel is a thorn in their side for this same reason.

    Through the ages there has been no imperialism like Islamic imperialism. The heart plucking Aztecs were chumps compared to the Islamic death toll. The peoples Islam has conquered and destroyed through the ages.

    When Obama studied Koran in Indonesia this consisted of him mindless memorizing then reciting the Koran in Arabic. Why? Because Arab imperialism is at the center of Islamic imperialism. In fact Islam got its start as a convenient fairy tale vehicle for Arab conquest/killings/forced conversions of their pagan and Christian neighbors. The Middle East was mostly Christian by the time Muhammad’s armies rolled out in 622. Islamic imperialism destroyed all this.

    The military career of Muhammad lasted for the final ten years of his life when he served as the leader of the ummah at Medina. They also sent out raiding parties against Arabic-speaking communities ruled under the Roman Empire. Muhammad was believed by the Muslims to be divinely chosen to spread Islam in world, and Muhammad ultimately permitted warfare as one aspect of this struggle.[1] After initially refusing to accede to requests by his followers to fight the Meccans for continued persecution and provocation, he eventually proclaimed the revelations of the Quran:

    “Permission to fight is given to those who are fought against because they have been wronged -truly Allah has the power to come to their support- those who were expelled from their homes without any right, merely for saying, ‘Our Lord is Allah’…” (Quran, 22:39-40)”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ivan
    Can you please check the population of the world at the time when Muslims were in a position to commit genocide against the 80 million Hindus credited to their bloodlust? See if this makes sense against the fact that like the Mongols, they needed a large helot population to keep them in luxury? This piece of fakery may ironically be the only item remembered of Will Durant's history. The Indian Muslims are largely converts from the lower castes as can be seen from their faces. The upper caste Muslims look different, like the Bollywood faces, since they were largely descended from Persians and Arabs, but these form a minority among the Muslims.
    , @KA
    How was Egypt turned into a muslim majority country?

    Jacobite(Coptic) had been persecuted and mistreated by the Orthodox . Jacobite hated tyrannical Byzantine administrations. (according to Caetani vol 1v p 81 , Justinian is said to have had 200,000 Copts put to death in the city of Alexandria
    Wansleben : THE PRESENT STATE OF EGYPT ,p 11 (London 1678)

    Caetani ( Leone,Principle di Teano): Annali deli Islam (Milano 1905- )

    Coptic or Jacobite became doctrinally more close to Islam by 12 th century .Some declared Jesus to be a man , a prophet .This added to the existing tension and the confusion.
    Egypt embraced Christianity very rapidly and gave up also very quickly . By the 7th century , Christianity had lost hold on the great mass of Egypt.
    Relief from taxation played a part as well.

    Severus: Severus ben el Moqaffa, Historia Patriarcharum Alexandrinorum,ed C F Seybold ( Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium , Scripture arabica Ser iii Tom ix ) (beryti 1905 )
    Even in 1290 christian used to have a majority presence in countries of Middle East other than Egypt and Arabia. That is according to the Crusade participant monk by name Burchard. It is most likley a n exaggeration But it tells something about the visibility and the survival of Christianity in Arab land .
    Burchard:Burchardi de Monte Sion Descriptio Terrae Sanctae (Peregrinatores Medii Aevi Quatuor . Ed. J C M Laurent ..Lipsiae 1864
    , @KA
    It is invalid and irrelevant to judge the 4 th century or 14 century from the prism of 21 century . It is but very valid to judge the epoch by the same measures that formed the essence of the laws,ethics,and morality of that era across the globe .
    In this age of decolonization , democracy,and support for freedom movement across the world , it is perfectly legitimate to renew same demands for Palestinian . In this age where we fight for LGBT right,women's rights,protection of children,and allude to Nuremberg ,right to feel secure in one's own home ,and proclaim property rights and freedom from state violence , it is perfectly normal and legal and moral to fight for the same right in Palestine or Congo or Hondurus or Tibet or Western Sahara .

    In this age where immigrants form the bulk of the population of Fiji,Mauritus, Guyana and of Australia or NZ and where immigrants could become senator and governor in US or UK or Canada or become the dominant power player in Indonesia or Phillipines , it is anachronistic to accept the expulsion and ethnic cleansing in Burma (and that is also under the cover of the democracy !) .
    Activities by the 10 th century Arabs should be judged by the standard the existing or the preceding regimes across the entire universe from China to Britain , from Moscow to Tanzania , and from India to Cambodia were exhibiting .
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. KA says:
    @Frankie P
    Philip,

    Perhaps it's time to admit that the US is not just a big idiot being led about by the Israelis and their fifth column in the US; the US is completely complicit in all the mess in the Middle East, Ukraine, etc. The majority of Americans seem to side with the apartheid state in the Levant, and I see NO SIGN of a politician emerging who will take on the Lobby. It's time to start rooting for the voices of reason, you know, the ones Asshat Ashton Carter says pose strategic threats. Time to drop the nostalgic longing for the way we were and face the ugly present and potentially nightmarish future. All brought to you by your elected representatives in Washington. Either that, or put down your pen and pick up a gun. Time to water that tree again.

    It is easy for us to blame the politicians on the ground of what is right and what is wrong. They are the products of the system . They are the finished and packaged goods ready for serve ,ready for delivery Ashton Carter,H Clinton, Huckabee Carson or Petreus or Fox anchors have gone through the ripening process and been well marinated . They are seasoned and veteran now.
    In some way they could be compared to the priest or lawyers or doctors who have graduated from the program. These people would not have graduated if they did not believe in God/ Bible, respect ing the judge , or in saving life and do no harm.
    Sme but perverse way , politicians wouldn’t have come this far in their careers had they not learnt the essential of American policy regarding Middle East .already . If they had any weird ideas like ” even handed ness or sticking to facts” pertaining to Israel and Middle East,they possibly would not have been even accepted in their youth in any political roles.

    It is true of any politicl system anywhere . But there is a big differrnce. At least in other countries ,it is still about the country concerned – their elite,their business,their financial houses nd military might and not about mortgaging those vital essentials to the whims of a foreign country.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. KA says:

    Israel and its supporters have been telling not to trust Hamas or Iran . Israel claim that they hide behind the words and the languages.

    Not that long ago Netanyahu promised that here would be no Palestinian state . His predecessors have said that stopping settlement is kind of ruse to keep America quiet before the visits .Dennis Ross has claimed that settlement is not the problem but problem is Palestinian insistence to stop settlement . Now Netanhyu promising American of him having good intention of working towards a Palestinan state . ( http://m.jpost.com/Israel-News/Politics-And-Diplomacy/Obama-to-Netanyahu-The-security-of-Israel-remains-a-top-priority-432495#article=6024MTBCOUM5MjgyMThCMEU0QTQ1QUM1N0UwODIxNzExRUE=)

    Language does help Israel in hiding its thoughts quite well
    .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {Language does help Israel in hiding its thoughts quite well}

    Same with your denialist Turk kin and your Neo-Ottoman Sultan lying Erdogan.
    Who are Uyguroğlar Turks from East Asia to rag on Israel ?
    When nomad Turks vacate the lands they are illegally occupying now, then they can legitimately complain about Israel occupying Palestinian lands.

    And Israelis are pikers compared to Turks when it comes to killing.
    How many Palestinians have Israelis killed or murdered since its founding ?
    25,000?
    30,000?
    Max.

    Between 1915-1923 alone Asiatic nomad Uyguroğlar Turks murdered about 4 million Christians in Asia Minor: Armenians, Assyrians, Pontic Greeks.
    Invading Turks are still occupying 40% of Cyprus.
    Who are you Turks to say anything about Israel ?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:
    @Sherman
    Israel has an "enthusiastic, politically powerful and extremely wealthy domestic Libby conniving on its [email protected]

    Thank goodness for that.

    This more than offsets the hate-filled anti-Israel propaganda from fringe Holocaust deniers like Giraldi.

    This more than offsets the hate-filled anti-Israel propaganda from fringe Holocaust deniers like Giraldi.

    You keep making this claim of Mr. Giraldi being a “Holocaust denier” and yet you have yet to give any proof. So? Care to share some examples with links or are you just going to keep on making unsubstantiated libelous claims?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:

    I could not BELIEVE during the GOP debate last night that John Kasich said the following words, “In Israel, we have no better ally in the world. No more criticizing them in public. We should support them.”

    No more criticizing them in public?! We are going bankrupt, our infrastructure is literally collapsing around us, and have an untold number of unemployed struggling Americans. Yet we send BILLIONS to Israel in aid and arms. BILLIONS. And the MOST important of all, we send OUR loved ones to die in THEIR wars. Why? What the hell have they EVER done for us other than bring us grief? And he doesn’t want us discussing how we benefit from and whether we should even BE supporting their Apartheid Regime?! Israel gets criticized because the disgusting-ness of an Apartheid Regime and its stranglehold on our politics DESERVES to be criticized. Unbelievable.

    “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” – Voltaire

    Here is a link to the debate. John Kasich’s above quote begins at the 2:00 mark. Please click on it if you would like to “simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YvvP49A4lg

    Read More
    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    • Replies: @Rurik
    He also said the TPP was necessary for jobs.

    Sometimes I imagine using a block and tackle

    http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/media/american_english/fullsize/b/blo/block/blockandtackle.jpg

    it's a simple device that allows an individual to lift much larger weights that he would otherwise be able to. Part of the reason is the load is lifted slowly. Like the average man could lift a 200lb load right into the air!

    So I imagine listening to someone like Kasich going on ...

    "We need to stop criticizing Israel, who is our greatest ally, and we've got to finally start getting tough with terrorists like Hamas and Assad and those returning American vets, and we need to be outsourcing and insourcing our jobs to protect our jobs and we need to confront Putin's aggressions and force him to respect international laww, anddd eeerrr!, wwweesghgrrr ugggrrrssshshsh "
    , @Realist
    "I could not BELIEVE during the GOP debate last night that John Kasich said the following words, “In Israel, we have no better ally in the world. No more criticizing them in public. We should support them.”"

    This is the sentiment of every presidential candidate, regardless of party. Most of their money comes from rich Zionist Jews.

    , @Art

    I could not BELIEVE during the GOP debate last night that John Kasich said the following words, “In Israel, we have no better ally in the world. No more criticizing them in public. We should support them.”
     
    What an outrage - Kasich lost it - he is through. We are hearing less and less “I’ll call Bibi on the first day of my presidency and give away the store.” I think the blind support for Israel is not an automatic winner with everyone anymore. I think that there is a voting constituency that does not like the control Jews hold over America.

    If Rand Paul would find the gonads to routinely use the word “neocon” and make more anti-war statements – guaranteed he could make it to the Republican convention.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Ivan says:
    @annamaria
    Well:
    "China and Iran's New Love Affair?" http://nationalinterest.org/feature/china-irans-new-love-affair-13434
    "India and Iran: Challenges and Opportunity" http://thediplomat.com/2015/09/india-iran-relations-challenges-and-opportunity/
    The most important factor explaining the US/UK politicians' loudly-proclaimed love for Israel is money. The smothering stench of corruption.

    Right on the mark annamarina. Much the world’s hardware is made in China, they also do cut rate software. India is not very far behind in manufacturing and software either. Yet to hear the Israeli partisans tell it, one would think that without them nothing happens.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Ivan says:
    @Clyde

    If the Israelis are engaged in “genocide” it’s the most incompetent genocide in history.
     
    Muslims are very competent genociders. For an example today just look at what ISIS is doing to Shiites, Christians and Yazidi. But never a peep here from our Israel-centric commenters here. Israel kills on the retail level (in self defense) while the Muslims do it to each other (Shiite vs Sunni) on the wholesale level. The Muslims wish they could kill off Israeli Jews on the wholesale level but the IDF is too strong.

    In the past the Islamics killed 80 million Hindus over a few centuries when conquering parts of India. Every Muslim from that area has Hindu ancestors if you can go back far enough.
    There is no imperialism like Islamic imperialism and that's why they covet the land that Jews live on in Israel. A few years back Osama Bin Laden was bellyaching about the Spanish Reconquista. How the Christians had taken back their lands from the Muslim imperialists. This runs against Islamic doctrine (such that it is), that once a land has gone Muslim it must never be permitted to revert back to non-Muslim rule. Israel is a thorn in their side for this same reason.

    Through the ages there has been no imperialism like Islamic imperialism. The heart plucking Aztecs were chumps compared to the Islamic death toll. The peoples Islam has conquered and destroyed through the ages.

    When Obama studied Koran in Indonesia this consisted of him mindless memorizing then reciting the Koran in Arabic. Why? Because Arab imperialism is at the center of Islamic imperialism. In fact Islam got its start as a convenient fairy tale vehicle for Arab conquest/killings/forced conversions of their pagan and Christian neighbors. The Middle East was mostly Christian by the time Muhammad's armies rolled out in 622. Islamic imperialism destroyed all this.


    The military career of Muhammad lasted for the final ten years of his life when he served as the leader of the ummah at Medina. They also sent out raiding parties against Arabic-speaking communities ruled under the Roman Empire. Muhammad was believed by the Muslims to be divinely chosen to spread Islam in world, and Muhammad ultimately permitted warfare as one aspect of this struggle.[1] After initially refusing to accede to requests by his followers to fight the Meccans for continued persecution and provocation, he eventually proclaimed the revelations of the Quran:

    "Permission to fight is given to those who are fought against because they have been wronged -truly Allah has the power to come to their support- those who were expelled from their homes without any right, merely for saying, 'Our Lord is Allah'..." (Quran, 22:39-40)"
     

    Can you please check the population of the world at the time when Muslims were in a position to commit genocide against the 80 million Hindus credited to their bloodlust? See if this makes sense against the fact that like the Mongols, they needed a large helot population to keep them in luxury? This piece of fakery may ironically be the only item remembered of Will Durant’s history. The Indian Muslims are largely converts from the lower castes as can be seen from their faces. The upper caste Muslims look different, like the Bollywood faces, since they were largely descended from Persians and Arabs, but these form a minority among the Muslims.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde
    The 80 million figure is from Hindu websites. This killing was done over five centuries so is a realistic number. You tell me what the worlds population was. The population of India was> Do want to cut this number in half to 40 million?
    I call this Islamic genocide and Islamic imperialism.
    Islam conquest in variable. Sometimes they forcibly convert or you will be killed. Sometimes conquered peoples are retained to slave away and pay the infamous Jizya tax. Sometimes Christian sons are stolen when young, brainwashed into Islam to serve in the Caliphate's armies. These were the Janissary armies of the imperialist Ottoman Empire. The Christians in the Balkans were forced to submit on this (convert and become Janissaries) because Islam is all about submission to Allah and then to his representatives on earth

    Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent mainly took place from the 12th to the 16th centuries (wikipedia)
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. Avery says:
    @KA
    Israel and its supporters have been telling not to trust Hamas or Iran . Israel claim that they hide behind the words and the languages.

    Not that long ago Netanyahu promised that here would be no Palestinian state . His predecessors have said that stopping settlement is kind of ruse to keep America quiet before the visits .Dennis Ross has claimed that settlement is not the problem but problem is Palestinian insistence to stop settlement . Now Netanhyu promising American of him having good intention of working towards a Palestinan state . ( http://m.jpost.com/Israel-News/Politics-And-Diplomacy/Obama-to-Netanyahu-The-security-of-Israel-remains-a-top-priority-432495#article=6024MTBCOUM5MjgyMThCMEU0QTQ1QUM1N0UwODIxNzExRUE=)

    Language does help Israel in hiding its thoughts quite well
    .

    {Language does help Israel in hiding its thoughts quite well}

    Same with your denialist Turk kin and your Neo-Ottoman Sultan lying Erdogan.
    Who are Uyguroğlar Turks from East Asia to rag on Israel ?
    When nomad Turks vacate the lands they are illegally occupying now, then they can legitimately complain about Israel occupying Palestinian lands.

    And Israelis are pikers compared to Turks when it comes to killing.
    How many Palestinians have Israelis killed or murdered since its founding ?
    25,000?
    30,000?
    Max.

    Between 1915-1923 alone Asiatic nomad Uyguroğlar Turks murdered about 4 million Christians in Asia Minor: Armenians, Assyrians, Pontic Greeks.
    Invading Turks are still occupying 40% of Cyprus.
    Who are you Turks to say anything about Israel ?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. If history were more fair, Germany would now be a Jewish State and ethnic Germans would be the ones living in the condition of Palestinians…

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    I've got to assume this is some weird form of sarcasm...

    Fran Macadam says:
    If history were more fair, Germany would now be a Jewish State and ethnic Germans would be the ones living in the condition of Palestinians…
     
    , @Rurik

    If history were more fair, Germany would now be a Jewish State and ethnic Germans would be the ones living in the condition of Palestinians…
     
    I hope it's not against the terms of service but I'm posting some porn just for you!

    http://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/may/01/news.features11

    or especially read this one, it will satisfy all your prurient needs for that void you feel that demands 'fairness'

    http://rense.com/general39/allied.htm

    more:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbp61fOVFaE


    My take is that no innocent person, (even of the German race [if that's possible from your perspective] can absolve the crimes of the criminals who committed them. If I'm not mistaken, it was the Nazi wrath against the Jewish banker class- who foisted the war in the first place- that gave them the pretext to persecute innocent Jews. I don't think the road to redemption of the human race is to persecute other innocents, be they German, Palestinian, or anyone else. But that's just my take.
    , @Anonymous
    Aha, the jew shows her true colors. Listen, Germany's already repaid whatever debt they incurred to world jewry 6 million times over. They don't owe you parasites a thing.
    , @SolontoCroesus

    If history were more fair, Germany would now be a Jewish State and ethnic Germans would be the ones living in the condition of Palestinians…
     
    Benjamin Netanyahu shares your sentiment, Fran Macadam:


    Netanyahu says Palestinian acceptance of Israeli security control key to two-state deal
    WASHINGTON—Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday that the “real test” of a two-state solution is Palestinians, Arabs and the world accepting Israeli security control over areas ceded in a peace deal.
    Netanyahu, who later met with members of Congress, said Israel must be able to defend itself, by itself.
    This includes threats from any territory Israel relinquishes, including hundreds of kilometres of borders subject to potential tunneling.
    Palestinians oppose this demand because they see it as blocking a “fully sovereign” Palestinian state, the Israeli leader said at the Center for American Progress think-tank in Washington.
    But he cited South Korea and World War II losers Germany and Japan as countries that prospered under foreign security control.
     
    "Foreign security control" is another word for Occupied, and attendant prosperity is, as was the Marshall Plan, more for the benefit of the occupier than the people who had surrendered their sovereignty. In other words, prosperity under foreign security control is socialized colonization in which colonizers eliminate the occupied's right to self-defense, and derive economic and strategic benefits but disclaim responsibility for the well-being of the population.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. I don’t get it. The article & comments give me the assumption that everyone here can’t wait for the destruction of Israel/Jews/Jerusalem etc. What is wrong with the Jewish people having Israel/Jerusalem as their homeland? We know – and they (Jews) know the Arabs want them all dead. I’m more concerned with the Pope calling for a New World Order… Please, someone respond.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
    "Please, someone respond"

    Ok, I'll bite. Clearly you're not familiar with the article's author and the people commenting or willfully choose not to notice there are people commenting other than anti-Semites, including Hasbara posing as anti-Semites who're present to smear the article's author with guilt by association for calling out Netanyahu on his BS. As well there are Jews who disapprove of Israeli policy and hate Netanyahu (e.g. Sam Shama), Goyim who disapprove of Israeli policy who're NOT anti-Semites and are NOT opposed to the state of Israel in per se (e.g. JR who expects behaviors from Israel conformed to the rules of international law.)

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/11/11/kafka-the-human-zoo/

    ^ My recent two cents on a great Jewish thinker radical Zionism wishes to claim; contrasted to a more primitive mindset (Jew & Goy alike), it's not a simplistic black & white subject no matter what certain cretins would prefer & pretend -

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. RobinG says:
    @Fran Macadam
    If history were more fair, Germany would now be a Jewish State and ethnic Germans would be the ones living in the condition of Palestinians...

    I’ve got to assume this is some weird form of sarcasm…

    Fran Macadam says:
    If history were more fair, Germany would now be a Jewish State and ethnic Germans would be the ones living in the condition of Palestinians…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. KA [AKA "Carthage"] says:
    @Clyde

    If the Israelis are engaged in “genocide” it’s the most incompetent genocide in history.
     
    Muslims are very competent genociders. For an example today just look at what ISIS is doing to Shiites, Christians and Yazidi. But never a peep here from our Israel-centric commenters here. Israel kills on the retail level (in self defense) while the Muslims do it to each other (Shiite vs Sunni) on the wholesale level. The Muslims wish they could kill off Israeli Jews on the wholesale level but the IDF is too strong.

    In the past the Islamics killed 80 million Hindus over a few centuries when conquering parts of India. Every Muslim from that area has Hindu ancestors if you can go back far enough.
    There is no imperialism like Islamic imperialism and that's why they covet the land that Jews live on in Israel. A few years back Osama Bin Laden was bellyaching about the Spanish Reconquista. How the Christians had taken back their lands from the Muslim imperialists. This runs against Islamic doctrine (such that it is), that once a land has gone Muslim it must never be permitted to revert back to non-Muslim rule. Israel is a thorn in their side for this same reason.

    Through the ages there has been no imperialism like Islamic imperialism. The heart plucking Aztecs were chumps compared to the Islamic death toll. The peoples Islam has conquered and destroyed through the ages.

    When Obama studied Koran in Indonesia this consisted of him mindless memorizing then reciting the Koran in Arabic. Why? Because Arab imperialism is at the center of Islamic imperialism. In fact Islam got its start as a convenient fairy tale vehicle for Arab conquest/killings/forced conversions of their pagan and Christian neighbors. The Middle East was mostly Christian by the time Muhammad's armies rolled out in 622. Islamic imperialism destroyed all this.


    The military career of Muhammad lasted for the final ten years of his life when he served as the leader of the ummah at Medina. They also sent out raiding parties against Arabic-speaking communities ruled under the Roman Empire. Muhammad was believed by the Muslims to be divinely chosen to spread Islam in world, and Muhammad ultimately permitted warfare as one aspect of this struggle.[1] After initially refusing to accede to requests by his followers to fight the Meccans for continued persecution and provocation, he eventually proclaimed the revelations of the Quran:

    "Permission to fight is given to those who are fought against because they have been wronged -truly Allah has the power to come to their support- those who were expelled from their homes without any right, merely for saying, 'Our Lord is Allah'..." (Quran, 22:39-40)"
     

    How was Egypt turned into a muslim majority country?

    Jacobite(Coptic) had been persecuted and mistreated by the Orthodox . Jacobite hated tyrannical Byzantine administrations. (according to Caetani vol 1v p 81 , Justinian is said to have had 200,000 Copts put to death in the city of Alexandria
    Wansleben : THE PRESENT STATE OF EGYPT ,p 11 (London 1678)

    Caetani ( Leone,Principle di Teano): Annali deli Islam (Milano 1905- )

    Coptic or Jacobite became doctrinally more close to Islam by 12 th century .Some declared Jesus to be a man , a prophet .This added to the existing tension and the confusion.
    Egypt embraced Christianity very rapidly and gave up also very quickly . By the 7th century , Christianity had lost hold on the great mass of Egypt.
    Relief from taxation played a part as well.

    Severus: Severus ben el Moqaffa, Historia Patriarcharum Alexandrinorum,ed C F Seybold ( Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium , Scripture arabica Ser iii Tom ix ) (beryti 1905 )
    Even in 1290 christian used to have a majority presence in countries of Middle East other than Egypt and Arabia. That is according to the Crusade participant monk by name Burchard. It is most likley a n exaggeration But it tells something about the visibility and the survival of Christianity in Arab land .
    Burchard:Burchardi de Monte Sion Descriptio Terrae Sanctae (Peregrinatores Medii Aevi Quatuor . Ed. J C M Laurent ..Lipsiae 1864

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    Thank you
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. KA [AKA "Carthage"] says:
    @Clyde

    If the Israelis are engaged in “genocide” it’s the most incompetent genocide in history.
     
    Muslims are very competent genociders. For an example today just look at what ISIS is doing to Shiites, Christians and Yazidi. But never a peep here from our Israel-centric commenters here. Israel kills on the retail level (in self defense) while the Muslims do it to each other (Shiite vs Sunni) on the wholesale level. The Muslims wish they could kill off Israeli Jews on the wholesale level but the IDF is too strong.

    In the past the Islamics killed 80 million Hindus over a few centuries when conquering parts of India. Every Muslim from that area has Hindu ancestors if you can go back far enough.
    There is no imperialism like Islamic imperialism and that's why they covet the land that Jews live on in Israel. A few years back Osama Bin Laden was bellyaching about the Spanish Reconquista. How the Christians had taken back their lands from the Muslim imperialists. This runs against Islamic doctrine (such that it is), that once a land has gone Muslim it must never be permitted to revert back to non-Muslim rule. Israel is a thorn in their side for this same reason.

    Through the ages there has been no imperialism like Islamic imperialism. The heart plucking Aztecs were chumps compared to the Islamic death toll. The peoples Islam has conquered and destroyed through the ages.

    When Obama studied Koran in Indonesia this consisted of him mindless memorizing then reciting the Koran in Arabic. Why? Because Arab imperialism is at the center of Islamic imperialism. In fact Islam got its start as a convenient fairy tale vehicle for Arab conquest/killings/forced conversions of their pagan and Christian neighbors. The Middle East was mostly Christian by the time Muhammad's armies rolled out in 622. Islamic imperialism destroyed all this.


    The military career of Muhammad lasted for the final ten years of his life when he served as the leader of the ummah at Medina. They also sent out raiding parties against Arabic-speaking communities ruled under the Roman Empire. Muhammad was believed by the Muslims to be divinely chosen to spread Islam in world, and Muhammad ultimately permitted warfare as one aspect of this struggle.[1] After initially refusing to accede to requests by his followers to fight the Meccans for continued persecution and provocation, he eventually proclaimed the revelations of the Quran:

    "Permission to fight is given to those who are fought against because they have been wronged -truly Allah has the power to come to their support- those who were expelled from their homes without any right, merely for saying, 'Our Lord is Allah'..." (Quran, 22:39-40)"
     

    It is invalid and irrelevant to judge the 4 th century or 14 century from the prism of 21 century . It is but very valid to judge the epoch by the same measures that formed the essence of the laws,ethics,and morality of that era across the globe .
    In this age of decolonization , democracy,and support for freedom movement across the world , it is perfectly legitimate to renew same demands for Palestinian . In this age where we fight for LGBT right,women’s rights,protection of children,and allude to Nuremberg ,right to feel secure in one’s own home ,and proclaim property rights and freedom from state violence , it is perfectly normal and legal and moral to fight for the same right in Palestine or Congo or Hondurus or Tibet or Western Sahara .

    In this age where immigrants form the bulk of the population of Fiji,Mauritus, Guyana and of Australia or NZ and where immigrants could become senator and governor in US or UK or Canada or become the dominant power player in Indonesia or Phillipines , it is anachronistic to accept the expulsion and ethnic cleansing in Burma (and that is also under the cover of the democracy !) .
    Activities by the 10 th century Arabs should be judged by the standard the existing or the preceding regimes across the entire universe from China to Britain , from Moscow to Tanzania , and from India to Cambodia were exhibiting .

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    Indeed.

    How long since we were enslaving, beating, lashing other humans? How recently were the British practicing keel-hauling, imprisonment for debt, and execution by drawing and quartering?

    Centuries after the Romans, there was crucifixion and impalement in Europe.

    "Medieval law codes such as the Holy Roman Empire’s “Constitutio Criminalis Carolina” stipulated that malevolent witchcraft should be punished by fire, ... the burning of witches across parts of modern day Germany, Italy, Scotland, France and Scandinavia. Historians estimated between the 15th and 18th centuries some 50,000 people executed in Europe. Many of these victims were hanged or beheaded first... Other were still alive when they faced the flames..."
    , @Clyde
    You are a super commie. You have thrown everything into the blender with that one. Have you ever met a national liberation movement you didn't like? Uncle Joe Stalin would have liked you except for that LBGT stuff. Stalin was all man and wanted nothing to do with gays. Similar to why Bad Vlad has such a low opinion of the bi-sexual Obama who forces gay US ambassadors down the throats of Muslim and other third world nations just to rub it in their faces. You know those cultures are hostile to gays. They don't have the tolerance we have here for these yoyos be they Bruce Jenner or whatever is in sexual fashion these days.

    Remember: There is no imperialism like Islamic imperialism and colonialism. Read up on Islam's bloody historical record when you have the time. It all started with Muhammad's first bloody wars of conquest in 622AD. His armies also fought for booty, the spoils of war and to procure female sex slaves same as ISIS does today.
    So contrary to your thinking it is correct to judge Islamic war making by how they did it 14 centuries ago because they are still using the same tactics. Especially terrorism.

    The statement of Muhammad: “I have been made victorious with terror.” The Hadith, collected by Bukhari (4.52.220) goes as follows:
    Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
    http://www.exmuslim.org/i-have-been-made-victorious-by-terror.html
     

    Islamic terrorism, however, did not start in 9/11 of 2001, nor did it start with the Iranian Islamic Revolution in 1979. Islamic terrorism has its origin in the sayings and examples set by Muhammad.

    In the last ten years of his life, after Muhammad migrated to Medina , he launched no less than 78 raids called qazwa (raid, ambush, sudden attack). Some of these qazwas involved the assassination of one opponent by one or a group of volunteers, and others were carried out by hundreds or thousands of warriors. Nonetheless a common characteristic of all Muhammad’s incursions was that they were done without notice. The enemy was caught off guard without being given the chance to prepare himself or be armed. As such all Muhammad’s victims were civilians.
    http://faithfreedom.org/challenge/terrorist.htm
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. Rurik says:
    @L.K
    "It happened, but to what degree and if there were actually genocidal gas chambers and an official agenda of a so-called ‘final solution’ is fodder for debate."

    No, it did NOT, not as alleged.
    No, there were NO homicidal gas chambers at the camps.
    No, there was no agenda, official or otherwise, to physically exterminate the Jews.

    No, it did NOT, not as alleged.
    No, there were NO homicidal gas chambers at the camps.
    No, there was no agenda, official or otherwise, to physically exterminate the Jews.

    “as alleged”

    Isn’t that exactly what I said?

    Jews were rounded up and put into camps, if they were suspected of being communists they were shot and likely never even made it to the camps. (personally from my pov, if they were commies, Jewish or otherwise, they deserved to be shot).

    Once in the camps they were often mistreated and from the videos of the emaciated bodies and ditches full of them, it is clear that the Holocaust was real.

    The details of which; whether or not there were homicidal gas chambers, lamp shades made from Jewish skin, soap, shrunken heads, bears and eagles used for killing, geysers of blood blasting out of the ground, lorries filled with Jewish babies that were tossed onto bomb fires, and all the rest of the hysterical lies are a blood libel they use to extort the German people specifically (and all white gentiles in general) who also suffered horribly- and the German civilians especially AFTER the war was over.

    What we know is that the Nazis did run camps for certain ethnicities including Jews, and that those Jews (and homosexuals and Gypsies and others) were often mistreated. That’s what I call the Holocaust. I don’t think that is disputed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. Rurik says:
    @Junior
    I could not BELIEVE during the GOP debate last night that John Kasich said the following words, "In Israel, we have no better ally in the world. No more criticizing them in public. We should support them."

    No more criticizing them in public?! We are going bankrupt, our infrastructure is literally collapsing around us, and have an untold number of unemployed struggling Americans. Yet we send BILLIONS to Israel in aid and arms. BILLIONS. And the MOST important of all, we send OUR loved ones to die in THEIR wars. Why? What the hell have they EVER done for us other than bring us grief? And he doesn't want us discussing how we benefit from and whether we should even BE supporting their Apartheid Regime?! Israel gets criticized because the disgusting-ness of an Apartheid Regime and its stranglehold on our politics DESERVES to be criticized. Unbelievable.

    "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Voltaire

    Here is a link to the debate. John Kasich's above quote begins at the 2:00 mark. Please click on it if you would like to "simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YvvP49A4lg

    He also said the TPP was necessary for jobs.

    Sometimes I imagine using a block and tackle

    it’s a simple device that allows an individual to lift much larger weights that he would otherwise be able to. Part of the reason is the load is lifted slowly. Like the average man could lift a 200lb load right into the air!

    So I imagine listening to someone like Kasich going on …

    “We need to stop criticizing Israel, who is our greatest ally, and we’ve got to finally start getting tough with terrorists like Hamas and Assad and those returning American vets, and we need to be outsourcing and insourcing our jobs to protect our jobs and we need to confront Putin’s aggressions and force him to respect international laww, anddd eeerrr!, wwweesghgrrr ugggrrrssshshsh “

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. Rurik says:
    @Fran Macadam
    If history were more fair, Germany would now be a Jewish State and ethnic Germans would be the ones living in the condition of Palestinians...

    If history were more fair, Germany would now be a Jewish State and ethnic Germans would be the ones living in the condition of Palestinians…

    I hope it’s not against the terms of service but I’m posting some porn just for you!

    http://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/may/01/news.features11

    or especially read this one, it will satisfy all your prurient needs for that void you feel that demands ‘fairness’

    http://rense.com/general39/allied.htm

    more:

    My take is that no innocent person, (even of the German race [if that's possible from your perspective] can absolve the crimes of the criminals who committed them. If I’m not mistaken, it was the Nazi wrath against the Jewish banker class- who foisted the war in the first place- that gave them the pretext to persecute innocent Jews. I don’t think the road to redemption of the human race is to persecute other innocents, be they German, Palestinian, or anyone else. But that’s just my take.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. @Invisible man
    I don't get it. The article & comments give me the assumption that everyone here can't wait for the destruction of Israel/Jews/Jerusalem etc. What is wrong with the Jewish people having Israel/Jerusalem as their homeland? We know - and they (Jews) know the Arabs want them all dead. I'm more concerned with the Pope calling for a New World Order... Please, someone respond.

    “Please, someone respond”

    Ok, I’ll bite. Clearly you’re not familiar with the article’s author and the people commenting or willfully choose not to notice there are people commenting other than anti-Semites, including Hasbara posing as anti-Semites who’re present to smear the article’s author with guilt by association for calling out Netanyahu on his BS. As well there are Jews who disapprove of Israeli policy and hate Netanyahu (e.g. Sam Shama), Goyim who disapprove of Israeli policy who’re NOT anti-Semites and are NOT opposed to the state of Israel in per se (e.g. JR who expects behaviors from Israel conformed to the rules of international law.)

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/11/11/kafka-the-human-zoo/

    ^ My recent two cents on a great Jewish thinker radical Zionism wishes to claim; contrasted to a more primitive mindset (Jew & Goy alike), it’s not a simplistic black & white subject no matter what certain cretins would prefer & pretend -

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik
    Hey Ronald,

    it seems like once these threads ebb off the radar, they become more or less abandoned and ignored, and so I feel a little more leeway in taking things off topic a bit.

    From your link


    Kafka posits the real nature of freedom and all of its beauty must be surrendered and be conformed to the White anthropomorphic expectation … to escape The Human Zoo..
     
    this is bizarre

    white ethnocentrism aside (which every race and tribe feels for their own- as they should), what does "the real nature of freedom and all of its beauty" have to do with "White anthropomorphic expectation"?

    you seem to be treating an appreciation for one's own kind as mutually exclusive to 'freedom and natural beauty'- concepts that span not just earthly and natural beauty, like sunsets or leopards, but the entire universe and beyond - and reduce all of this to the anthropomorphism of white people who happen to be enamored of their own (as all people should be). What about "black is beautiful"? Is that ethnocentrism also an example of a surrender of all beauty and freedom to anthropomorphic expectation?

    But this escape is at best superficial because of those physical traits Black people possess that White Europeans interpret as relating Blacks to apes. Blacks, like apes, in Kafka’s quite accurate perception, can never be peer to the European whose prejudice is an innate, immutable cultural supremacism based in a superficial narcissism of a White appearance
     
    What struck me about your essay was the mention of "The Human Zoo". One of the most influential books I read as a teenager was The Naked Ape by Desmond Morris. His subsequent book was The Human Zoo, also quite good. (I recommend them both). Anyways his point is that we are all apes, and nothing but apes, even if the human ape is in many ways quite extraordinary, yet we are all, in every single way, apes. And that is how we act, just like apes. Territorial, spending our days foraging and hunting (careers) and eating and fornicating and grooming and sleeping and doing all the things that great apes do.

    So I saw a little irony in the way you were accusing white people of seeing black people like apes. We are all apes. Through and though. No matter how much conceit we might muster that we're like little gods walking around.
    , @Invisible man
    Thanks for the info, Ronald. Not sure I understand much of it such as calling out Netanyahu on his BS.(?) Also, radical Zionism. What does this mean?... Over here in the States we hear screaming and shouting at Israel for being mean & cruel to the people who are trying to obliterate them and Jerusalem off the face of the Earth. Doesn't seem to make sense.

    I love the photo in your article Kafka & The Human Zoo. The photo reminds me of Detroit circa 2015. I was born in Detroit on the inside of the fence. 50 years later all us white people are on the outside of the sharp stick fence. As I see it, African Americans moved in, whites moved out and behold a similar human zoo was created.

    Thanks again,

    *
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. RobinG says:
    @KA
    It is invalid and irrelevant to judge the 4 th century or 14 century from the prism of 21 century . It is but very valid to judge the epoch by the same measures that formed the essence of the laws,ethics,and morality of that era across the globe .
    In this age of decolonization , democracy,and support for freedom movement across the world , it is perfectly legitimate to renew same demands for Palestinian . In this age where we fight for LGBT right,women's rights,protection of children,and allude to Nuremberg ,right to feel secure in one's own home ,and proclaim property rights and freedom from state violence , it is perfectly normal and legal and moral to fight for the same right in Palestine or Congo or Hondurus or Tibet or Western Sahara .

    In this age where immigrants form the bulk of the population of Fiji,Mauritus, Guyana and of Australia or NZ and where immigrants could become senator and governor in US or UK or Canada or become the dominant power player in Indonesia or Phillipines , it is anachronistic to accept the expulsion and ethnic cleansing in Burma (and that is also under the cover of the democracy !) .
    Activities by the 10 th century Arabs should be judged by the standard the existing or the preceding regimes across the entire universe from China to Britain , from Moscow to Tanzania , and from India to Cambodia were exhibiting .

    Indeed.

    How long since we were enslaving, beating, lashing other humans? How recently were the British practicing keel-hauling, imprisonment for debt, and execution by drawing and quartering?

    Centuries after the Romans, there was crucifixion and impalement in Europe.

    “Medieval law codes such as the Holy Roman Empire’s “Constitutio Criminalis Carolina” stipulated that malevolent witchcraft should be punished by fire, … the burning of witches across parts of modern day Germany, Italy, Scotland, France and Scandinavia. Historians estimated between the 15th and 18th centuries some 50,000 people executed in Europe. Many of these victims were hanged or beheaded first… Other were still alive when they faced the flames…”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Marais says:
    @geokat62

    Dick Cheney is an investor in the Texas business...
     
    Cheney is also an investor in Haliburton, a company that was awarded no-bid contracts for rebuilding Iraq.

    So this is how the game is played: the US MIC gets billions in armament sales to destroy the Zionist Project's enemies, and companies like Halibuton make billions to rebuild it. Rinse and repeat.

    If you look at the portfolios of the top Zionists/Israel firsters, they are heavily weighted in these two types of stocks.

    And the best thing about it is if you are God's chosen, you don't have any sense of guilt because you know that, on the basis of Exodus 17:14, G-d has promised his people that he will help them "blot out the name" of Amalek.

    So what has become abundantly clear over the last decade and a half is that governments no longer pursue policies that are in the national interest. They pursue policies that are in the interest of the 1%. But I can assure you that their Return on Investment (ROI) is much higher than 1%. Just ask Cheney et al.

    “Cheney is also an investor in Haliburton, a company that was awarded no-bid contracts for rebuilding Iraq.”

    KBR (spun off from Halliburton 2007) leads the list of government contracts for Iraq 2003-13: $39.5 billion of a $138 billion total [Angelo Young, IBTimes 19 Mar 2013].

    “I can tell you, Joe, the government had absolutely nothing to do with it.”
    -Dick Cheney, responding to Lieberman’s comment that he had done well financially at Halliburton, October 2000 Debate

    Government had everything to do with it.

    Cheney, who had little business experience and none in the oil industry, was hired as CEO of Halliburton in August 1995. The company’s government business under LOGCAP (which Cheney helped craft as Secretary of Defense in 1992) went from $144 million in 1994 to $423 million in 1996, and $900 million plus in 1999. The company billed the government $2 billion for Project Joint Endeavor (Bosnia & Kosovo) 1995-2000 on a cost-plus basis.

    Under Cheney, Halliburton rose from 73rd to 18th on the Pentagon’s contractor list; it’s government contracting rose 91%. Halliburton secured $100 million in government backed loans from the US Export-Import Bank 1990-1995; under Cheney’s tenure it received $1.5 billion (1995-2000).

    Cheney resigned from Halliburton in July 2000 to run with GW Bush. He cashed in $30 million in stock options and continued to receive deferred salary ($205,298 in 2001; $162,392 in 2002; $178,437 in 2003) and held 433,333 unexercised stock options in 2004. His net worth (after five years as CEO of a private company) was estimated at $70 million plus.

    “governments no longer pursue policies that are in the national interest. They pursue policies that are in the interest of the 1%.”

    The 1% probably share the same belief as Louis XIV: “L’État c’est moi” (“I am the state”). And they’re busy replacing republican democracy with corporate feudalism.

    Read More
    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    • Replies: @Rurik
    Please also don't forget that not only Cheney is set to benefit from the oil drilling in the Golan Heights, but also Rupert Murdoch, who uses his media empire to sell the idea that "Assad must go!", never pointing out the obvious conflict of interest. So every time you hear some shill on Fox News shilling about supporting the "moderate rebels", that's Murdoch blatantly trying to steal the Golan from Syria and hand it to his Zionist buddies in Israel.

    http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21677597-geologists-israel-think-they-have-found-oilin-very-tricky-territory-black-gold?frsc=dg%7Cc

    http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/11/11/437193/US-Israel-Golan-Heights-Syria-Neytanyahu-Obama
    , @Orville H. Larson
    Piss on "Five Deferments Dick" Cheney, that armchair commando of renown.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Clyde says:
    @KA
    It is invalid and irrelevant to judge the 4 th century or 14 century from the prism of 21 century . It is but very valid to judge the epoch by the same measures that formed the essence of the laws,ethics,and morality of that era across the globe .
    In this age of decolonization , democracy,and support for freedom movement across the world , it is perfectly legitimate to renew same demands for Palestinian . In this age where we fight for LGBT right,women's rights,protection of children,and allude to Nuremberg ,right to feel secure in one's own home ,and proclaim property rights and freedom from state violence , it is perfectly normal and legal and moral to fight for the same right in Palestine or Congo or Hondurus or Tibet or Western Sahara .

    In this age where immigrants form the bulk of the population of Fiji,Mauritus, Guyana and of Australia or NZ and where immigrants could become senator and governor in US or UK or Canada or become the dominant power player in Indonesia or Phillipines , it is anachronistic to accept the expulsion and ethnic cleansing in Burma (and that is also under the cover of the democracy !) .
    Activities by the 10 th century Arabs should be judged by the standard the existing or the preceding regimes across the entire universe from China to Britain , from Moscow to Tanzania , and from India to Cambodia were exhibiting .

    You are a super commie. You have thrown everything into the blender with that one. Have you ever met a national liberation movement you didn’t like? Uncle Joe Stalin would have liked you except for that LBGT stuff. Stalin was all man and wanted nothing to do with gays. Similar to why Bad Vlad has such a low opinion of the bi-sexual Obama who forces gay US ambassadors down the throats of Muslim and other third world nations just to rub it in their faces. You know those cultures are hostile to gays. They don’t have the tolerance we have here for these yoyos be they Bruce Jenner or whatever is in sexual fashion these days.

    Remember: There is no imperialism like Islamic imperialism and colonialism. Read up on Islam’s bloody historical record when you have the time. It all started with Muhammad’s first bloody wars of conquest in 622AD. His armies also fought for booty, the spoils of war and to procure female sex slaves same as ISIS does today.
    So contrary to your thinking it is correct to judge Islamic war making by how they did it 14 centuries ago because they are still using the same tactics. Especially terrorism.

    [MORE]

    The statement of Muhammad: “I have been made victorious with terror.” The Hadith, collected by Bukhari (4.52.220) goes as follows:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

    http://www.exmuslim.org/i-have-been-made-victorious-by-terror.html

    Islamic terrorism, however, did not start in 9/11 of 2001, nor did it start with the Iranian Islamic Revolution in 1979. Islamic terrorism has its origin in the sayings and examples set by Muhammad.

    In the last ten years of his life, after Muhammad migrated to Medina , he launched no less than 78 raids called qazwa (raid, ambush, sudden attack). Some of these qazwas involved the assassination of one opponent by one or a group of volunteers, and others were carried out by hundreds or thousands of warriors. Nonetheless a common characteristic of all Muhammad’s incursions was that they were done without notice. The enemy was caught off guard without being given the chance to prepare himself or be armed. As such all Muhammad’s victims were civilians.

    http://faithfreedom.org/challenge/terrorist.htm

    Read More
    • Replies: @bunga
    Yes I looked at the history and see Cannanites, Hyskos, Amalekite Hiparu, and I hear Esther. I read and try to understand why Muslim Prophet did not slaughter all the Jews he could after the victory against bani ( quite a few were there in Arab at that time .) I wonder why Jews lived as Dhimmi and why they did not leave for a better place in Africa or China or Germany . At least the Jews have been always leaving for greener pastures . They are leaving now Eastern Europe and Russia and Argentina for Germany,UK,and US
    , @bunga
    Saddam was just a ‘neighborhood bully,’ Netanyahu says– 13 years after saying Saddam threatened ‘security of our entire world’ - See more at: http://mondoweiss.net/2015/11/neighborhood-netanyahu-threatened#sthash.NnhQ8s83.dpuf

    The deception by Hipru ( Hebrew ) against Cannanite and later against Persian still ring so recent , poignant ,and fresh . Nothing has changed even the selecting "other" to carry out the task..
    , @KA
    "Empires cost money, and the price of ours – which in based on the principle of everything goes out and nothing comes in – is exorbitantly high. Which is probably what led Center for American Progress head honcho Neera Tanden, who is close to Hillary Clinton, to propose charging countries that we invade and conquer for the costs of subjugating and occupying them. Tanden proposed – seriously – that we seize Libya’s oil as the price for “liberating” them, i.e. turning their country into a terrorist version of Disney World.
    "
    "Empires cost money, and the price of ours – which in based on the principle of everything goes out and nothing comes in – is exorbitantly high. Which is probably what led Center for American Progress head honcho Neera Tanden, who is close to Hillary Clinton, to propose charging countries that we invade and conquer for the costs of subjugating and occupying them. Tanden proposed – seriously – that we seize Libya’s oil as the price for “liberating” them, i.e. turning their country into a terrorist version of Disney World.

    http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2015/11/10/the-enemy-within/
    "
    Did it originate from Neera Tnfen or dd she borrow it from Wolfowitz ? Or may be she borrowed it from Trump
    This is better,perfected version of imperialism.
    I wonder why she didnot demand for the soldiers from those countries also to fight ,occupy and thus spare the Americn lives
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. Realist says:
    @Junior
    I could not BELIEVE during the GOP debate last night that John Kasich said the following words, "In Israel, we have no better ally in the world. No more criticizing them in public. We should support them."

    No more criticizing them in public?! We are going bankrupt, our infrastructure is literally collapsing around us, and have an untold number of unemployed struggling Americans. Yet we send BILLIONS to Israel in aid and arms. BILLIONS. And the MOST important of all, we send OUR loved ones to die in THEIR wars. Why? What the hell have they EVER done for us other than bring us grief? And he doesn't want us discussing how we benefit from and whether we should even BE supporting their Apartheid Regime?! Israel gets criticized because the disgusting-ness of an Apartheid Regime and its stranglehold on our politics DESERVES to be criticized. Unbelievable.

    "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Voltaire

    Here is a link to the debate. John Kasich's above quote begins at the 2:00 mark. Please click on it if you would like to "simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YvvP49A4lg

    “I could not BELIEVE during the GOP debate last night that John Kasich said the following words, “In Israel, we have no better ally in the world. No more criticizing them in public. We should support them.””

    This is the sentiment of every presidential candidate, regardless of party. Most of their money comes from rich Zionist Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. Clyde says:
    @Ivan
    Can you please check the population of the world at the time when Muslims were in a position to commit genocide against the 80 million Hindus credited to their bloodlust? See if this makes sense against the fact that like the Mongols, they needed a large helot population to keep them in luxury? This piece of fakery may ironically be the only item remembered of Will Durant's history. The Indian Muslims are largely converts from the lower castes as can be seen from their faces. The upper caste Muslims look different, like the Bollywood faces, since they were largely descended from Persians and Arabs, but these form a minority among the Muslims.

    The 80 million figure is from Hindu websites. This killing was done over five centuries so is a realistic number. You tell me what the worlds population was. The population of India was> Do want to cut this number in half to 40 million?
    I call this Islamic genocide and Islamic imperialism.
    Islam conquest in variable. Sometimes they forcibly convert or you will be killed. Sometimes conquered peoples are retained to slave away and pay the infamous Jizya tax. Sometimes Christian sons are stolen when young, brainwashed into Islam to serve in the Caliphate’s armies. These were the Janissary armies of the imperialist Ottoman Empire. The Christians in the Balkans were forced to submit on this (convert and become Janissaries) because Islam is all about submission to Allah and then to his representatives on earth

    Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent mainly took place from the 12th to the 16th centuries (wikipedia)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ivan
    The Hindu buggers got it from Will Durant who was of the pre-internet age. Muslim conquerors were responsible for genocides as can be read from Crowds and Power by Elias.Canetti. But they could never have anywhere near 80 millions. The population at the turn of the 20th century was about 1 billion. Extrapolate it back to see if this figure is plausible. Not everything done in the name of Islam is due to the Arabs and Persians. The Mongols who devastated Baghdad were pretty much in action in India too.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. Rurik says:
    @Ronald Thomas West
    "Please, someone respond"

    Ok, I'll bite. Clearly you're not familiar with the article's author and the people commenting or willfully choose not to notice there are people commenting other than anti-Semites, including Hasbara posing as anti-Semites who're present to smear the article's author with guilt by association for calling out Netanyahu on his BS. As well there are Jews who disapprove of Israeli policy and hate Netanyahu (e.g. Sam Shama), Goyim who disapprove of Israeli policy who're NOT anti-Semites and are NOT opposed to the state of Israel in per se (e.g. JR who expects behaviors from Israel conformed to the rules of international law.)

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/11/11/kafka-the-human-zoo/

    ^ My recent two cents on a great Jewish thinker radical Zionism wishes to claim; contrasted to a more primitive mindset (Jew & Goy alike), it's not a simplistic black & white subject no matter what certain cretins would prefer & pretend -

    Hey Ronald,

    it seems like once these threads ebb off the radar, they become more or less abandoned and ignored, and so I feel a little more leeway in taking things off topic a bit.

    From your link

    Kafka posits the real nature of freedom and all of its beauty must be surrendered and be conformed to the White anthropomorphic expectation … to escape The Human Zoo..

    this is bizarre

    white ethnocentrism aside (which every race and tribe feels for their own- as they should), what does “the real nature of freedom and all of its beauty” have to do with “White anthropomorphic expectation”?

    you seem to be treating an appreciation for one’s own kind as mutually exclusive to ‘freedom and natural beauty’- concepts that span not just earthly and natural beauty, like sunsets or leopards, but the entire universe and beyond – and reduce all of this to the anthropomorphism of white people who happen to be enamored of their own (as all people should be). What about “black is beautiful”? Is that ethnocentrism also an example of a surrender of all beauty and freedom to anthropomorphic expectation?

    But this escape is at best superficial because of those physical traits Black people possess that White Europeans interpret as relating Blacks to apes. Blacks, like apes, in Kafka’s quite accurate perception, can never be peer to the European whose prejudice is an innate, immutable cultural supremacism based in a superficial narcissism of a White appearance

    What struck me about your essay was the mention of “The Human Zoo”. One of the most influential books I read as a teenager was The Naked Ape by Desmond Morris. His subsequent book was The Human Zoo, also quite good. (I recommend them both). Anyways his point is that we are all apes, and nothing but apes, even if the human ape is in many ways quite extraordinary, yet we are all, in every single way, apes. And that is how we act, just like apes. Territorial, spending our days foraging and hunting (careers) and eating and fornicating and grooming and sleeping and doing all the things that great apes do.

    So I saw a little irony in the way you were accusing white people of seeing black people like apes. We are all apes. Through and though. No matter how much conceit we might muster that we’re like little gods walking around.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
    Hey Hasbara, how's tricks?

    Desmond Morris? He probably got his impressions reading Edgar Rice Burroughs as a child and ran with them. I notice you've neglected altogether the Blacks kept in captivity and on public display in Europe. So, we're all apes but as Orwell had noted (paraphrased) all apes are equal but some apes are more equal. Like the Great White apes, right?

    Here's the link again so people interested in your out of context misrepresentations can see your omissions for themselves:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/11/11/kafka-the-human-zoo/

    Or, for those who prefer satire (piece includes Desmond Morris)

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/04/01/merge/

    ^
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. Rurik says:
    @Marais

    “Cheney is also an investor in Haliburton, a company that was awarded no-bid contracts for rebuilding Iraq.”
     
    KBR (spun off from Halliburton 2007) leads the list of government contracts for Iraq 2003-13: $39.5 billion of a $138 billion total [Angelo Young, IBTimes 19 Mar 2013].

    “I can tell you, Joe, the government had absolutely nothing to do with it.”
    -Dick Cheney, responding to Lieberman’s comment that he had done well financially at Halliburton, October 2000 Debate
     
    Government had everything to do with it.

    Cheney, who had little business experience and none in the oil industry, was hired as CEO of Halliburton in August 1995. The company’s government business under LOGCAP (which Cheney helped craft as Secretary of Defense in 1992) went from $144 million in 1994 to $423 million in 1996, and $900 million plus in 1999. The company billed the government $2 billion for Project Joint Endeavor (Bosnia & Kosovo) 1995-2000 on a cost-plus basis.

    Under Cheney, Halliburton rose from 73rd to 18th on the Pentagon’s contractor list; it’s government contracting rose 91%. Halliburton secured $100 million in government backed loans from the US Export-Import Bank 1990-1995; under Cheney’s tenure it received $1.5 billion (1995-2000).

    Cheney resigned from Halliburton in July 2000 to run with GW Bush. He cashed in $30 million in stock options and continued to receive deferred salary ($205,298 in 2001; $162,392 in 2002; $178,437 in 2003) and held 433,333 unexercised stock options in 2004. His net worth (after five years as CEO of a private company) was estimated at $70 million plus.

    “governments no longer pursue policies that are in the national interest. They pursue policies that are in the interest of the 1%.”
     
    The 1% probably share the same belief as Louis XIV: “L’État c’est moi” (“I am the state”). And they’re busy replacing republican democracy with corporate feudalism.

    Please also don’t forget that not only Cheney is set to benefit from the oil drilling in the Golan Heights, but also Rupert Murdoch, who uses his media empire to sell the idea that “Assad must go!”, never pointing out the obvious conflict of interest. So every time you hear some shill on Fox News shilling about supporting the “moderate rebels”, that’s Murdoch blatantly trying to steal the Golan from Syria and hand it to his Zionist buddies in Israel.

    http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21677597-geologists-israel-think-they-have-found-oilin-very-tricky-territory-black-gold?frsc=dg%7Cc

    http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/11/11/437193/US-Israel-Golan-Heights-Syria-Neytanyahu-Obama

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marais
    Thanks for the links (I’m woefully behind reading the Economist). Larry Summers, Richardson, and ‘WW4’ Wolsey too! It just keeps getting better and better. Does FNC still have Saudi prince Al-Waleed bin Talal as major investor?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. @Rurik
    Hey Ronald,

    it seems like once these threads ebb off the radar, they become more or less abandoned and ignored, and so I feel a little more leeway in taking things off topic a bit.

    From your link


    Kafka posits the real nature of freedom and all of its beauty must be surrendered and be conformed to the White anthropomorphic expectation … to escape The Human Zoo..
     
    this is bizarre

    white ethnocentrism aside (which every race and tribe feels for their own- as they should), what does "the real nature of freedom and all of its beauty" have to do with "White anthropomorphic expectation"?

    you seem to be treating an appreciation for one's own kind as mutually exclusive to 'freedom and natural beauty'- concepts that span not just earthly and natural beauty, like sunsets or leopards, but the entire universe and beyond - and reduce all of this to the anthropomorphism of white people who happen to be enamored of their own (as all people should be). What about "black is beautiful"? Is that ethnocentrism also an example of a surrender of all beauty and freedom to anthropomorphic expectation?

    But this escape is at best superficial because of those physical traits Black people possess that White Europeans interpret as relating Blacks to apes. Blacks, like apes, in Kafka’s quite accurate perception, can never be peer to the European whose prejudice is an innate, immutable cultural supremacism based in a superficial narcissism of a White appearance
     
    What struck me about your essay was the mention of "The Human Zoo". One of the most influential books I read as a teenager was The Naked Ape by Desmond Morris. His subsequent book was The Human Zoo, also quite good. (I recommend them both). Anyways his point is that we are all apes, and nothing but apes, even if the human ape is in many ways quite extraordinary, yet we are all, in every single way, apes. And that is how we act, just like apes. Territorial, spending our days foraging and hunting (careers) and eating and fornicating and grooming and sleeping and doing all the things that great apes do.

    So I saw a little irony in the way you were accusing white people of seeing black people like apes. We are all apes. Through and though. No matter how much conceit we might muster that we're like little gods walking around.

    Hey Hasbara, how’s tricks?

    Desmond Morris? He probably got his impressions reading Edgar Rice Burroughs as a child and ran with them. I notice you’ve neglected altogether the Blacks kept in captivity and on public display in Europe. So, we’re all apes but as Orwell had noted (paraphrased) all apes are equal but some apes are more equal. Like the Great White apes, right?

    Here’s the link again so people interested in your out of context misrepresentations can see your omissions for themselves:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/11/11/kafka-the-human-zoo/

    Or, for those who prefer satire (piece includes Desmond Morris)

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/04/01/merge/

    ^

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik
    shall I call you ghost of Custer,

    you’ve neglected altogether the Blacks kept in captivity and on public display in Europe.
     
    sure, Europeans and others put human curiosities on display. Ever been to a circus? But if you're condemning the European race for that, perhaps as bad as it was, it's better than what blacks often did to white missionaries during those days. As in New Guinea, the Congo, and elsewhere. Hmm, yummy!

    All peoples have their cultural peculiarities. For civilized (relatively) Europe, the peoples of uncivilized places must surely have been as much a curiosity as any bearded lady or 'Elephant' man.

    So, we’re all apes but as Orwell had noted (paraphrased) all apes are equal but some apes are more equal. Like the Great White apes, right?
     
    No Custer, you have it exactly backwards. In today's western society, and especially the US, it is strictly speaking the great "white" ape who is officially and "legally" treated less equal. Told to get to the back of the line for jobs and promotions and university or medical school slots. Denigrated in movies and print, his ancestors smeared as evil. But never enough to satisfy the raging resentments of some of those self-purported 'more equal than other' apes.

    I wonder what the chances are of non-white apes of handing over the reins of their nations and societies to white people out of a sense of sympathy and compassion? - Two things that whites seem to have in such abundance that there's no amount of self-flagellation that will ever sate the hate of some other.. apes.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. Marais says:
    @Rurik
    Please also don't forget that not only Cheney is set to benefit from the oil drilling in the Golan Heights, but also Rupert Murdoch, who uses his media empire to sell the idea that "Assad must go!", never pointing out the obvious conflict of interest. So every time you hear some shill on Fox News shilling about supporting the "moderate rebels", that's Murdoch blatantly trying to steal the Golan from Syria and hand it to his Zionist buddies in Israel.

    http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21677597-geologists-israel-think-they-have-found-oilin-very-tricky-territory-black-gold?frsc=dg%7Cc

    http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/11/11/437193/US-Israel-Golan-Heights-Syria-Neytanyahu-Obama

    Thanks for the links (I’m woefully behind reading the Economist). Larry Summers, Richardson, and ‘WW4’ Wolsey too! It just keeps getting better and better. Does FNC still have Saudi prince Al-Waleed bin Talal as major investor?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    Wolsey too!
     
    I know

    I consider him to be one of the very top worst human beings on the planet, and perhaps the worst traitor to "his" country alive today. A real piece of work that guy. And there they all are.
    , @anonymous
    Woolsey to address Westminster Institute

    http://www.westminster-institute.org/announcements/events/when-iran-goes-nuclear-technology-and-ideology-with-former-cia-director-james-woolsey/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. Art says:
    @Junior
    I could not BELIEVE during the GOP debate last night that John Kasich said the following words, "In Israel, we have no better ally in the world. No more criticizing them in public. We should support them."

    No more criticizing them in public?! We are going bankrupt, our infrastructure is literally collapsing around us, and have an untold number of unemployed struggling Americans. Yet we send BILLIONS to Israel in aid and arms. BILLIONS. And the MOST important of all, we send OUR loved ones to die in THEIR wars. Why? What the hell have they EVER done for us other than bring us grief? And he doesn't want us discussing how we benefit from and whether we should even BE supporting their Apartheid Regime?! Israel gets criticized because the disgusting-ness of an Apartheid Regime and its stranglehold on our politics DESERVES to be criticized. Unbelievable.

    "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Voltaire

    Here is a link to the debate. John Kasich's above quote begins at the 2:00 mark. Please click on it if you would like to "simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YvvP49A4lg

    I could not BELIEVE during the GOP debate last night that John Kasich said the following words, “In Israel, we have no better ally in the world. No more criticizing them in public. We should support them.”

    What an outrage – Kasich lost it – he is through. We are hearing less and less “I’ll call Bibi on the first day of my presidency and give away the store.” I think the blind support for Israel is not an automatic winner with everyone anymore. I think that there is a voting constituency that does not like the control Jews hold over America.

    If Rand Paul would find the gonads to routinely use the word “neocon” and make more anti-war statements – guaranteed he could make it to the Republican convention.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    And I think you're succumbing to wishful thinking. “I’ll call Bibi on the first day of my presidency and give away the store,” is EXACTLY what Hillary is saying, and she's looking increasingly likely. The Dems won't challenge her, and the Reps don't go beyond her emails. They won't call her a bloodthirsty neocon hawk, because so are they.

    Who really disappoints me is O'Malley. His pal Chafee was making good points about foreign policy - which nobody noticed because he shot himself in the foot by bringing up the metric system so that was all the MSM covered. I had hoped when Chafee dropped out that O'Malley would pick up the banner, but no such luck.

    Anyway, maybe all my hopes were ill-founded if the Pope is really pro-Israel. O'Malley's Catholicism and Jesuit education might have translated into moral diplomacy. His debate points have just been political generalities (for the benefit of the Dem Party). If he's not playing to win, at least he could call out the Israel Lobby. I guess he's afraid he'd have no public OR private career later if he did that.
    , @geokat62

    If Rand Paul would find the gonads to routinely use the word “neocon” and make more anti-war statements – guaranteed he could make it to the Republican convention.
     
    Didn't his father, Ron Paul, have "the gonads to routinely use the word 'neocon' and make more anti-war statements," but he still didn't make it to the convention?

    People need to wake up to the fact that the political system has been hijacked by the 1% (otherwise known as the 4 big Bs: Big Banking, Big Pharma, Big MIC, and last but not least Big Zion) and they are not about to relinquish it voluntarily.

    Big changes are needed and they are not going to come from within the system itself.
    , @Junior

    I think that there is a voting constituency that does not like the control Jews hold over America.
     
    There is a voting constituency that does not like the control Zionists hold over America.

    Kasich is NOT Jewish, he is Protestant. The majority of our Congressmen are NOT Jewish, but they ARE Zionists. Be it for personal gain or religious reasons, they are Zionists because they seek to further the Political Agenda of Zionism. Not all Jewish people are Zionists and not all Zionists are Jewish. By your blaming of a religion, Judaism, instead of blaming the political ideology, Zionism, you are not only misdirecting your blame but you are also giving a free pass to all the non-Jewish Zionists. And there are a LOT of them.

    Zionism is support for the State of Israel. Zionists will TRY to make you believe that all Jewish people are Zionists but this is false. Zionism is NOT Judaism. Our problem is not Judaism. The problem is our support for the State of Israel, aka Zionism.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. @Marais

    “Cheney is also an investor in Haliburton, a company that was awarded no-bid contracts for rebuilding Iraq.”
     
    KBR (spun off from Halliburton 2007) leads the list of government contracts for Iraq 2003-13: $39.5 billion of a $138 billion total [Angelo Young, IBTimes 19 Mar 2013].

    “I can tell you, Joe, the government had absolutely nothing to do with it.”
    -Dick Cheney, responding to Lieberman’s comment that he had done well financially at Halliburton, October 2000 Debate
     
    Government had everything to do with it.

    Cheney, who had little business experience and none in the oil industry, was hired as CEO of Halliburton in August 1995. The company’s government business under LOGCAP (which Cheney helped craft as Secretary of Defense in 1992) went from $144 million in 1994 to $423 million in 1996, and $900 million plus in 1999. The company billed the government $2 billion for Project Joint Endeavor (Bosnia & Kosovo) 1995-2000 on a cost-plus basis.

    Under Cheney, Halliburton rose from 73rd to 18th on the Pentagon’s contractor list; it’s government contracting rose 91%. Halliburton secured $100 million in government backed loans from the US Export-Import Bank 1990-1995; under Cheney’s tenure it received $1.5 billion (1995-2000).

    Cheney resigned from Halliburton in July 2000 to run with GW Bush. He cashed in $30 million in stock options and continued to receive deferred salary ($205,298 in 2001; $162,392 in 2002; $178,437 in 2003) and held 433,333 unexercised stock options in 2004. His net worth (after five years as CEO of a private company) was estimated at $70 million plus.

    “governments no longer pursue policies that are in the national interest. They pursue policies that are in the interest of the 1%.”
     
    The 1% probably share the same belief as Louis XIV: “L’État c’est moi” (“I am the state”). And they’re busy replacing republican democracy with corporate feudalism.

    Piss on “Five Deferments Dick” Cheney, that armchair commando of renown.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marais
    Liz (half of his latest ventriloquist act) also merits irrigation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. annamaria says:
    @KA
    How was Egypt turned into a muslim majority country?

    Jacobite(Coptic) had been persecuted and mistreated by the Orthodox . Jacobite hated tyrannical Byzantine administrations. (according to Caetani vol 1v p 81 , Justinian is said to have had 200,000 Copts put to death in the city of Alexandria
    Wansleben : THE PRESENT STATE OF EGYPT ,p 11 (London 1678)

    Caetani ( Leone,Principle di Teano): Annali deli Islam (Milano 1905- )

    Coptic or Jacobite became doctrinally more close to Islam by 12 th century .Some declared Jesus to be a man , a prophet .This added to the existing tension and the confusion.
    Egypt embraced Christianity very rapidly and gave up also very quickly . By the 7th century , Christianity had lost hold on the great mass of Egypt.
    Relief from taxation played a part as well.

    Severus: Severus ben el Moqaffa, Historia Patriarcharum Alexandrinorum,ed C F Seybold ( Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium , Scripture arabica Ser iii Tom ix ) (beryti 1905 )
    Even in 1290 christian used to have a majority presence in countries of Middle East other than Egypt and Arabia. That is according to the Crusade participant monk by name Burchard. It is most likley a n exaggeration But it tells something about the visibility and the survival of Christianity in Arab land .
    Burchard:Burchardi de Monte Sion Descriptio Terrae Sanctae (Peregrinatores Medii Aevi Quatuor . Ed. J C M Laurent ..Lipsiae 1864

    Thank you

    Read More
    • Replies: @KA
    Welcome
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. RobinG says:
    @Art

    I could not BELIEVE during the GOP debate last night that John Kasich said the following words, “In Israel, we have no better ally in the world. No more criticizing them in public. We should support them.”
     
    What an outrage - Kasich lost it - he is through. We are hearing less and less “I’ll call Bibi on the first day of my presidency and give away the store.” I think the blind support for Israel is not an automatic winner with everyone anymore. I think that there is a voting constituency that does not like the control Jews hold over America.

    If Rand Paul would find the gonads to routinely use the word “neocon” and make more anti-war statements – guaranteed he could make it to the Republican convention.

    And I think you’re succumbing to wishful thinking. “I’ll call Bibi on the first day of my presidency and give away the store,” is EXACTLY what Hillary is saying, and she’s looking increasingly likely. The Dems won’t challenge her, and the Reps don’t go beyond her emails. They won’t call her a bloodthirsty neocon hawk, because so are they.

    Who really disappoints me is O’Malley. His pal Chafee was making good points about foreign policy – which nobody noticed because he shot himself in the foot by bringing up the metric system so that was all the MSM covered. I had hoped when Chafee dropped out that O’Malley would pick up the banner, but no such luck.

    Anyway, maybe all my hopes were ill-founded if the Pope is really pro-Israel. O’Malley’s Catholicism and Jesuit education might have translated into moral diplomacy. His debate points have just been political generalities (for the benefit of the Dem Party). If he’s not playing to win, at least he could call out the Israel Lobby. I guess he’s afraid he’d have no public OR private career later if he did that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art
    "If he’s (O'Malley) not playing to win, at least he could call out the Israel Lobby. I guess he’s afraid he’d have no public OR private career later if he did that."

    Exactly – he has to work the Jew divide and conquer political scene – or he will be trashed.

    Look at what is happening to these liberal collage administrators – they are being thrown under the buss by the latest divide and conquer politics – the extreme over the top Black Panther like “black lives matter” nonsense.

    I do not know how anyone can vote for these destructive people.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. Rurik says:
    @Ronald Thomas West
    Hey Hasbara, how's tricks?

    Desmond Morris? He probably got his impressions reading Edgar Rice Burroughs as a child and ran with them. I notice you've neglected altogether the Blacks kept in captivity and on public display in Europe. So, we're all apes but as Orwell had noted (paraphrased) all apes are equal but some apes are more equal. Like the Great White apes, right?

    Here's the link again so people interested in your out of context misrepresentations can see your omissions for themselves:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/11/11/kafka-the-human-zoo/

    Or, for those who prefer satire (piece includes Desmond Morris)

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/04/01/merge/

    ^

    shall I call you ghost of Custer,

    you’ve neglected altogether the Blacks kept in captivity and on public display in Europe.

    sure, Europeans and others put human curiosities on display. Ever been to a circus? But if you’re condemning the European race for that, perhaps as bad as it was, it’s better than what blacks often did to white missionaries during those days. As in New Guinea, the Congo, and elsewhere. Hmm, yummy!

    All peoples have their cultural peculiarities. For civilized (relatively) Europe, the peoples of uncivilized places must surely have been as much a curiosity as any bearded lady or ‘Elephant’ man.

    So, we’re all apes but as Orwell had noted (paraphrased) all apes are equal but some apes are more equal. Like the Great White apes, right?

    No Custer, you have it exactly backwards. In today’s western society, and especially the US, it is strictly speaking the great “white” ape who is officially and “legally” treated less equal. Told to get to the back of the line for jobs and promotions and university or medical school slots. Denigrated in movies and print, his ancestors smeared as evil. But never enough to satisfy the raging resentments of some of those self-purported ‘more equal than other’ apes.

    I wonder what the chances are of non-white apes of handing over the reins of their nations and societies to white people out of a sense of sympathy and compassion? – Two things that whites seem to have in such abundance that there’s no amount of self-flagellation that will ever sate the hate of some other.. apes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
    Hey again Hasbara, how clever you imagine yourself, detracting from the whole of my initial comment, reproduced in full here:

    “Please, someone respond”

    Ok, I’ll bite. Clearly you’re not familiar with the article’s author and the people commenting or willfully choose not to notice there are people commenting other than anti-Semites, including Hasbara posing as anti-Semites who’re present to smear the article’s author with guilt by association for calling out Netanyahu on his BS. As well there are Jews who disapprove of Israeli policy and hate Netanyahu (e.g. Sam Shama), Goyim who disapprove of Israeli policy who’re NOT anti-Semites and are NOT opposed to the state of Israel in per se (e.g. JR who expects behaviors from Israel conformed to the rules of international law.)

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/11/11/kafka-the-human-zoo/

    ^ My recent two cents on a great Jewish thinker radical Zionism wishes to claim; contrasted to a more primitive mindset (Jew & Goy alike), it’s not a simplistic black & white subject no matter what certain cretins would prefer & pretend -

    ***

    Meanwhile, glad to see you whine about becoming part of that 'great White minority' having to move over and make some room -

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Rurik says:
    @Marais
    Thanks for the links (I’m woefully behind reading the Economist). Larry Summers, Richardson, and ‘WW4’ Wolsey too! It just keeps getting better and better. Does FNC still have Saudi prince Al-Waleed bin Talal as major investor?

    Wolsey too!

    I know

    I consider him to be one of the very top worst human beings on the planet, and perhaps the worst traitor to “his” country alive today. A real piece of work that guy. And there they all are.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marais
    Woolsey certainly is a piece of work - a soul as dark as Michael Ledeen, but smarter, more dangerous, and a lot greedier.

    “Only fear will reestablish [Arab] respect for us...We need a little bit of Machiavelli.”
    -James Woolsey Glasgow Sunday Herald 13 April 2003
     
    ‘Iraqi Freedom’ in Woolsey’s view was all about instilling fear in Arabs, ‘shock and awe’ sanctified by Bernard Lewis and others:

    “America needed to hit someone in the Arab-Muslim world. Smashing Saudi Arabia or Syria would have been fine. But we hit Saddam for one simple reason: because we could, and because he deserved it.”
    -Thomas Friedman New York Times 4 June 2003
     
    And who else shares their view?

    "The rules of engagement have become so rigid that governments often straightjacket themselves in the face of unambiguous aggression...The application of military force, or the prospect of such application, inhibits terrorist violence."
    -Benjamin Netanyahu 'Terrorism: How the West Can Win' 1987
     
    It’s a pity they didn’t watch Pontecorvo’s ‘Battle of Algiers’ (or learned nothing from it).

    Woolsey’s interest in Iraq seems pretty basic: financial self-enrichment:

    “The Iraq war is part of World War IV. This is going to be a long war, very long indeed. I hope not as long as the Cold War, 40 plus years, but certainly longer than either World War I or World War II. I rather imagine it's going to be measured, I'm afraid, in decades...”
    -James Woolsey April 2003
     
    Woolsey hoped for “a long war...measured in decades.” The ventures he advised, the boards on which he sat would need time to maximize revenue. Paladin’s Homeland Security Fund, for example, would need a stable, long term conflict to attract investors and manifest profits.

    I wonder if he’s involved in TPP.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. annamaria says:
    @Sherman
    Israel has an "enthusiastic, politically powerful and extremely wealthy domestic Libby conniving on its [email protected]

    Thank goodness for that.

    This more than offsets the hate-filled anti-Israel propaganda from fringe Holocaust deniers like Giraldi.

    “Israel has an “enthusiastic, politically powerful and extremely wealthy domestic Lobby conniving on its behalf..”
    Conniving against whom? And for whose expense? The victims of the WWII included the enormous numbers of other non-arians, for instance, Slavs, yet the Holocaust Museums are focused on one ethnic group only. The deaths of Palestinian children and teenagers by Israeli weaponry are more than a stain on the Israeli narrative of Holocaust – the collective punishment of the civilian populations on the Israel-occupied territories, and the astonishing murderous behavior of Illegal settlers, make a rejection of the moral loading of the Holocaust narrative. Zionism is an ugly and malignant disease that puts conscientious Jewery in a difficult position. Zionist has evolved into the apartheid practices, warmongering, stealing other people’ land and property, while generously dressing the rationale for these activities with theocratic source and often-questionable historical claims.
    The current discussion is actually about the Zionists’ disloyalty to the countries of their comfortable dwelling. The USA have been used by Israel via the US Zionists; this use was and is parasitic.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. geokat62 says:
    @Art

    I could not BELIEVE during the GOP debate last night that John Kasich said the following words, “In Israel, we have no better ally in the world. No more criticizing them in public. We should support them.”
     
    What an outrage - Kasich lost it - he is through. We are hearing less and less “I’ll call Bibi on the first day of my presidency and give away the store.” I think the blind support for Israel is not an automatic winner with everyone anymore. I think that there is a voting constituency that does not like the control Jews hold over America.

    If Rand Paul would find the gonads to routinely use the word “neocon” and make more anti-war statements – guaranteed he could make it to the Republican convention.

    If Rand Paul would find the gonads to routinely use the word “neocon” and make more anti-war statements – guaranteed he could make it to the Republican convention.

    Didn’t his father, Ron Paul, have “the gonads to routinely use the word ‘neocon’ and make more anti-war statements,” but he still didn’t make it to the convention?

    People need to wake up to the fact that the political system has been hijacked by the 1% (otherwise known as the 4 big Bs: Big Banking, Big Pharma, Big MIC, and last but not least Big Zion) and they are not about to relinquish it voluntarily.

    Big changes are needed and they are not going to come from within the system itself.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art
    “Didn’t his father, Ron Paul, have “the gonads to routinely use the word ‘neocon’ and make more anti-war statements,” but he still didn’t make it to the convention?”

    We do not have to win this time. But we have to start someplace.

    If Rand Paul were to go to the Republican convention with 5 or 10 percent of the delegates spouting his anti-neocon, anti-war, anti-fed message that would be a major victory.

    Today we have ZERO. We need a acknowledged presence in the body politic. The truth is powerful – it will work its way.

    p..s. We could have a brokered Republican convention were no one have the required votes to win – those 5 or 10 percent could be king makers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. schmenz says:
    @Greasy William

    Perhaps it’s time to admit that the US is not just a big idiot being led about by the Israelis and their fifth column in the US; the US is completely complicit in all the mess in the Middle East, Ukraine, etc. The majority of Americans seem to side with the apartheid state in the Levant, and I see NO SIGN of a politician emerging who will take on the Lobby
     
    Thank you! Finally one of you retards admits the truth. The American people do not give a shit about what happens to the Palestinians and there is nothing you can do to save them.

    Please educate your fellow retarded Paleocons so the rest of us don't need to keep listening to their endless complaining on the internet.


    If it makes you feel any better, Israel won't be an apartheid state much longer, as soon the Palestinians will all be dead or expelled. Enjoy them while they last.

    I congratulate you, Greasy. For cold-hearted, reptilian, merciless cynicism you have no peer. The other Israeli cheerleaders here cannot hold a candle to you.

    I want to go out and vomit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. bunga says:
    @Clyde
    You are a super commie. You have thrown everything into the blender with that one. Have you ever met a national liberation movement you didn't like? Uncle Joe Stalin would have liked you except for that LBGT stuff. Stalin was all man and wanted nothing to do with gays. Similar to why Bad Vlad has such a low opinion of the bi-sexual Obama who forces gay US ambassadors down the throats of Muslim and other third world nations just to rub it in their faces. You know those cultures are hostile to gays. They don't have the tolerance we have here for these yoyos be they Bruce Jenner or whatever is in sexual fashion these days.

    Remember: There is no imperialism like Islamic imperialism and colonialism. Read up on Islam's bloody historical record when you have the time. It all started with Muhammad's first bloody wars of conquest in 622AD. His armies also fought for booty, the spoils of war and to procure female sex slaves same as ISIS does today.
    So contrary to your thinking it is correct to judge Islamic war making by how they did it 14 centuries ago because they are still using the same tactics. Especially terrorism.

    The statement of Muhammad: “I have been made victorious with terror.” The Hadith, collected by Bukhari (4.52.220) goes as follows:
    Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
    http://www.exmuslim.org/i-have-been-made-victorious-by-terror.html
     

    Islamic terrorism, however, did not start in 9/11 of 2001, nor did it start with the Iranian Islamic Revolution in 1979. Islamic terrorism has its origin in the sayings and examples set by Muhammad.

    In the last ten years of his life, after Muhammad migrated to Medina , he launched no less than 78 raids called qazwa (raid, ambush, sudden attack). Some of these qazwas involved the assassination of one opponent by one or a group of volunteers, and others were carried out by hundreds or thousands of warriors. Nonetheless a common characteristic of all Muhammad’s incursions was that they were done without notice. The enemy was caught off guard without being given the chance to prepare himself or be armed. As such all Muhammad’s victims were civilians.
    http://faithfreedom.org/challenge/terrorist.htm
     

    Yes I looked at the history and see Cannanites, Hyskos, Amalekite Hiparu, and I hear Esther. I read and try to understand why Muslim Prophet did not slaughter all the Jews he could after the victory against bani ( quite a few were there in Arab at that time .) I wonder why Jews lived as Dhimmi and why they did not leave for a better place in Africa or China or Germany . At least the Jews have been always leaving for greener pastures . They are leaving now Eastern Europe and Russia and Argentina for Germany,UK,and US

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. @Rurik
    shall I call you ghost of Custer,

    you’ve neglected altogether the Blacks kept in captivity and on public display in Europe.
     
    sure, Europeans and others put human curiosities on display. Ever been to a circus? But if you're condemning the European race for that, perhaps as bad as it was, it's better than what blacks often did to white missionaries during those days. As in New Guinea, the Congo, and elsewhere. Hmm, yummy!

    All peoples have their cultural peculiarities. For civilized (relatively) Europe, the peoples of uncivilized places must surely have been as much a curiosity as any bearded lady or 'Elephant' man.

    So, we’re all apes but as Orwell had noted (paraphrased) all apes are equal but some apes are more equal. Like the Great White apes, right?
     
    No Custer, you have it exactly backwards. In today's western society, and especially the US, it is strictly speaking the great "white" ape who is officially and "legally" treated less equal. Told to get to the back of the line for jobs and promotions and university or medical school slots. Denigrated in movies and print, his ancestors smeared as evil. But never enough to satisfy the raging resentments of some of those self-purported 'more equal than other' apes.

    I wonder what the chances are of non-white apes of handing over the reins of their nations and societies to white people out of a sense of sympathy and compassion? - Two things that whites seem to have in such abundance that there's no amount of self-flagellation that will ever sate the hate of some other.. apes.

    Hey again Hasbara, how clever you imagine yourself, detracting from the whole of my initial comment, reproduced in full here:

    “Please, someone respond”

    Ok, I’ll bite. Clearly you’re not familiar with the article’s author and the people commenting or willfully choose not to notice there are people commenting other than anti-Semites, including Hasbara posing as anti-Semites who’re present to smear the article’s author with guilt by association for calling out Netanyahu on his BS. As well there are Jews who disapprove of Israeli policy and hate Netanyahu (e.g. Sam Shama), Goyim who disapprove of Israeli policy who’re NOT anti-Semites and are NOT opposed to the state of Israel in per se (e.g. JR who expects behaviors from Israel conformed to the rules of international law.)

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/11/11/kafka-the-human-zoo/

    ^ My recent two cents on a great Jewish thinker radical Zionism wishes to claim; contrasted to a more primitive mindset (Jew & Goy alike), it’s not a simplistic black & white subject no matter what certain cretins would prefer & pretend -

    ***

    Meanwhile, glad to see you whine about becoming part of that ‘great White minority’ having to move over and make some room -

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik
    Hey Custer,

    Kafka was indeed a genius, and an extraordinary man

    I didn't comment your initial comment because I have no issue with it

    I did however comment on the bizarre theory that suggested that all things of 'freedom and beauty' are somehow negated by white people's 'narcissistic anthropomorphic expectation'. It just sounded a little out there, Custer.

    And I guess I was a little bored. Wanted to stir the pot a little. ; )
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. “This more than offsets the hate-filled anti-Israel propaganda from fringe Holocaust deniers like Giraldi.”

    There are definitely comments here that are overtly antisemitic, so exaggerated and over the top, that I wonder whether they are from genuinely unhinged people who hate “the Jews” pathologically, or are from Hasbara opportunists who seek to create an impression of guilt by association for anyone who offers needed critique of the Likudnik faction’s policies.

    As for my comment about history being more fair were Germans subjected to the treatment that Palestinians receive instead by proxy, even the Likud Israeli Prime Minister’s recent comments reveal as much. He said that the Germans didn’t want to gas Jews; that was the device of Palestinians. Since even the German leadership corrected him with the information that it was indeed Germans who thought it up, Mr. Netanyahu is clearly making Palestinians hapless stand-ins for the Germans.

    Without the German program of genocide against Jews, accompanied by the wholly inadequate response to it by the rest of the gentile world, there would currently be no Israel as currently constituted. Its creation is the byproduct of the consequences of two world wars and the Holocaust.

    The Palestinians displaced through a lesser form of ethnic cleansing to give Jewish settlers living space are those who are suffering the consequences for the war crimes that Germany as a nation committed from the 1930s, once ruled by the Nazis with popular support.

    One notion of justice is that the evil that one plans for others, comes back on one instead. In this case, Germany has escaped most consequences, notably because of its usefulness for the proxy wars with the Soviet Union. The head of West German intelligence was a notorious Nazi protected by the west and catapulted into that useful position.

    The Palestinians, without financial clout or political importance, were seen as disposable, their displacement the useful path of least resistance. Of course, no people really are disposable and eventually the chickens come home to roost, or described in realistic Chalmers Johnson terms, blowback.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik
    Hello Fran,

    As for my comment about history being more fair were Germans subjected to the treatment that Palestinians receive instead by proxy, even the Likud Israeli Prime Minister’s recent comments reveal as much
     
    OK, so you weren't being facetious. You do feel it would be fair for the German people today to suffer what the Palestinians suffer. You do feel that people are guilty of the crimes of their ancestors. And that they should be made to pay. Even if they had no part in it.

    Since even the German leadership corrected him with the information that it was indeed Germans who thought it up,
     
    In case you haven't noticed the German government today is one of the most completely and absolutely occupied by the Zionists and Jewish power structure. A German politician doesn't fart unless he's sure it's OK with the Jews, even more so than England or the US or Israel, for that matter. I think the only government more slavishly under the boot of the Zionists, is.. well, there isn't one. So when the German government (or media) tells the world that the German people are guilty for all time for the Holocaust, (much of which is lies) we are not hearing precisely from people who are representing the interests of the German people without prejudice.

    Without the German program of genocide against Jews, accompanied by the wholly inadequate response to it by the rest of the gentile world,
     
    let me help you out here, what you mean to say is the Nazi program of genocide. OK? There is a difference, even if you have been inundated with decades of anti-German propaganda. If you want to blame the German people for all perpetuity because of the crimes of a government they had 70+ years ago, then you have to blame all people everywhere for the crimes of some obscure people who lived long ago and did terrible things to others during war. That pretty much encompasses us all.

    The Palestinians displaced through a lesser form of ethnic cleansing to give Jewish settlers living space are those who are suffering the consequences for the war crimes that Germany as a nation committed from the 1930s, once ruled by the Nazis with popular support.
     
    now the displacement (and slaughter) of the Palestinians from their own ancient lands is a "lesser" form of ethnic cleansing. And if you didn't know, it was the Jews who wanted and coveted that land. The Germans didn't force them to go there. It was Jewish terrorists who slaughtered their way across Palestine and drove those people out of their homes and villages. But now somehow all of that genocidal terror and butchery is now the direct fault of a German child born today.

    One notion of justice is that the evil that one plans for others, comes back on one instead.
     
    But Fran, all the Nazis are dead. Punishing a race (out of pure hate) for the crimes of what a few of them did is exactly what the Nazi did. Do you understand that? It's what the Zionists do to Gaza when they bomb them indiscriminately for a so called rocket attack. To say the Germans should be genocided and displaced and tormented by Jewish sadists is the same evil mentality that the Nazis and Zionists were and are engaged in, respectively.

    No one deserved to be punished for the crimes of others. A child born in America today does not deserve to suffer for the myriad and unprecedented crimes that the US government is committing today. Russians today should not be punished for the crimes of Stalin. Vietnamese children should not be punished for the crimes of Pol Pot, Chinese should not be punished for the crimes of Mao. But some of us can't get past our hate. We want to heap blame and guilt upon others, not for anything that they've done, but for what they look like. It's sad and pathetic.
    , @SolontoCroesus
    some time ago Giraldi explained that Fran Macadam was an old friend.

    perhaps Giraldi the historian can correct his old friend's historical failures revealed in this comment:

    [A] Without the German program of genocide against Jews, [B] accompanied by the wholly inadequate response to it by the rest of the gentile world, there would [C} currently be no Israel as currently constituted.
     
    I. The chronological failures:
    1. Israel "as currently constituted" was conceived and gestated beginning in the first decade of the 20th century. The German Warburgs, the international banking family Rothschild, and other German-born and German-educated experts established the core institutions of "Israel as currently constituted," including acquiring some of the most fertile land in the region, the Jezreal valley, and building Tel Aviv, by 1910.
    No holocaust in sight in 1910, other than in Rabbi Stephen Wise's preaching.

    2. By 1917 Chaim Weizmann had secured the Balfour Declaration, the pledge of the British government to "look with favour on the establishment of a homeland for Jews in Palestine," -- a pledge addressed to Baron Rothschild by which the world's then-mightiest empire extended security guarantees to the zionist colonization project.
    1917 and still no holocaust in sight.

    3. In 1937 David Ben Gurion wrote to his son to the effect that the small footprint that Jews had in Palestine "as an outcome of the Great War" did not satisfy the intentions of the zionist colonizers but would do until the plans for expansion could be fully implemented.

    Also by 1937, zionist Jews had built luxury residences for Chaim Weizmann and the Schocken family in Rehovath; had built Hebrew University and a medical center also in Rehovath. Erich Mendelsohn, "the Jewish architect" who designed and built those institutions created the international style of housing and other buildings that dominated Palestine-turning-into-Israel; by 1937 zionist settlers had established governing bodies, banks, unions, kibbutzes, farms, schools and roads in the zionist project in Palestine. "Israel" had many of the institutions of a state; it was lacking only a declaration of statehood, declared boundaries, and a constitution.
    Still no holocaust.

    In a meeting on June 11, 1944 of the Jewish Agency in Tel Aviv, headed by David Ben Gurion, the Agency asserted that "Auschwitz is a labor camp," and they elected to refrain from asking the Allies to "bomb Auschwitz" lest "a single Jewish person be harmed." (source; a paper by Rafael Medoff of Wyman Institute).

    Israel self-declared itself in 1948. Israel has not yet declared boundaries nor a constitution.
    That declaration was preceded by an alleged holocaust of Jews and coincided with the mass transfer of millions of ethnic Germans and Russians, many of them to their deaths, as well as the dispossession of an estimated 700,000 residents of Palestine and the killing of thousands more of Palestinians by well-armed and organized Jewish militias and terror organizations.

    Thus, Fran Macadam's chronology is backward: C. came before A, (to the extent A. has truth-value), and B. is a vicious slur on the American people.

    II. Failures in cause-effect:

    1. If the above timeline is irrefutably true, and it is, then it cannot be said that a "German program of genocide" caused the constitution of the zionist project in Palestine: an effect cannot occur before its causality. Thus, zionism caused Nazism.

    2. Fran Macadam seems to agree with Robert Cohen that persons such as this commenter who question the illogic and implausibility of the holocaust narrative are on the "fringe;" Cohen wrote:

    Holocaust denial will remain a fringe issue. The documentation is secure in its veracity and overwhelming in its volume. If anything, today’s school children are in danger of thinking that Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin went to war against Hitler because of what was happening to the Jews. - http://mondoweiss.net/2015/01/auschwitz-revisited#sthash.rWtU7hOj.dpuf
     
    As well, Fran Macadam is squarely in the camp of those "school children [who] are in danger thinking" what Cohen implies is a totally wrong apprehension of reality -- that "Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin went to war against Hitler because of what was happening to the Jews."

    The question, Why did "Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin go to war against Hitler" is left unanswered, despite "documentation [that] is secure in its veracity and overwhelming in its volume" -- but which, as Prof. Kathy Peiss reports, also has been pilfered, filtered, censored and destroyed by Jewish persons such as her uncle and other Allied agents.

    III. When so much is at stake, it's extremely important to get the facts and logic right.
    Fran Macadam's statement fails on all counts.
    If ordinary critical analysis is now the equivalent of 'holocaust denial," then call me Fringe and unhinged. The alternative is to live in the same bizarro world as Bibi Netanyahu.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. bunga says:

    Recognize Israeli annexation of Golan, Netanyahu hints to Obama

    As Syrian war grinds on into fifth year, Israel believes it is time ‘to think differently’ about ownership of plateau

    By Times of Israel staff November 10, 2015, 6:35 pm 20

    US ,UK, France ,Germany, Guam ,Hondurus and Australia might recognize .So can Portugal or half of Africa
    But it does not mean the struggle to take in back even after 100 years will be illegal or will be an expression of Jihad .
    Israeli lovers would like to label it that way though to get more money from US or capture more land from some other country .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  108. bunga says:
    @Greasy William

    Perhaps it’s time to admit that the US is not just a big idiot being led about by the Israelis and their fifth column in the US; the US is completely complicit in all the mess in the Middle East, Ukraine, etc. The majority of Americans seem to side with the apartheid state in the Levant, and I see NO SIGN of a politician emerging who will take on the Lobby
     
    Thank you! Finally one of you retards admits the truth. The American people do not give a shit about what happens to the Palestinians and there is nothing you can do to save them.

    Please educate your fellow retarded Paleocons so the rest of us don't need to keep listening to their endless complaining on the internet.


    If it makes you feel any better, Israel won't be an apartheid state much longer, as soon the Palestinians will all be dead or expelled. Enjoy them while they last.

    You will be listening for a long time unfortunately .
    Cowards ,incompetent job seekers, people coveting for positions do all the time what Neera Tanden or whole CAP just did. Education is way down the list of priority ,when the job you wanted to have ,could be had only after gutting reason ,expressing internalized fear with respect ,and rigging the debates through rigged questions ,screening attendees, shutting audience and claiming how successful the show was in merit and how forceful was the conviction . When there is no job to have ,you still want to hang around for some emotional crumbs after long years of browbeating by the rascals masquerading as national leader . That way you tell the world : you are still relevant .You still have services to offer to the rascals.

    http://mondoweiss.net/2015/11/netanyahu-conversation-twilight

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. Ivan says:
    @Clyde
    The 80 million figure is from Hindu websites. This killing was done over five centuries so is a realistic number. You tell me what the worlds population was. The population of India was> Do want to cut this number in half to 40 million?
    I call this Islamic genocide and Islamic imperialism.
    Islam conquest in variable. Sometimes they forcibly convert or you will be killed. Sometimes conquered peoples are retained to slave away and pay the infamous Jizya tax. Sometimes Christian sons are stolen when young, brainwashed into Islam to serve in the Caliphate's armies. These were the Janissary armies of the imperialist Ottoman Empire. The Christians in the Balkans were forced to submit on this (convert and become Janissaries) because Islam is all about submission to Allah and then to his representatives on earth

    Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent mainly took place from the 12th to the 16th centuries (wikipedia)
     

    The Hindu buggers got it from Will Durant who was of the pre-internet age. Muslim conquerors were responsible for genocides as can be read from Crowds and Power by Elias.Canetti. But they could never have anywhere near 80 millions. The population at the turn of the 20th century was about 1 billion. Extrapolate it back to see if this figure is plausible. Not everything done in the name of Islam is due to the Arabs and Persians. The Mongols who devastated Baghdad were pretty much in action in India too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @KA
    India is interesting in many ways .
    Today's NYT on page B1-India Facing Climate Change,
    " 30% of the world's poorest call it home living less than 1.90 dollar a day. 304 million don't have access to electricity ;92 million have no access to safe drinking water "
    Against this statistics,how do the countries in turmoil in Middle East compare? How did the countries in Latin America compare?
    Both Christianity and Islam freed the poor,the indigent,the downtrodden to think beyond what was told and what was explained to them by the God 's own class- the self defined and self -appointed elite and High Priest . They did not accept the arrangement by the rulrs , they did not stay beholden to the imposed dispensation . They revolted .

    In India,these poor think that it is their fate .They are told to love and enjoy it ( sometime back Narendra Modi told that these poor actually enjoyed serving the rich,doing the menial job )

    This is why India doesn't engage in revolt . They had to get converted to Islam,Christinity,Buddhism or Communist to think that they are human being .This is one of the reason of targeted anger against Christianity in Northern India .
    , @Clyde
    I get your thinking. What do you think the Hindu population was back then and what percentage was killed by the Islamic invaders? You don't like the 80 million number. What to make a guess? My opinion it was a very high number. 20% at least, and up to 40% of Hindus slaughtered.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. bunga says:
    @Clyde
    You are a super commie. You have thrown everything into the blender with that one. Have you ever met a national liberation movement you didn't like? Uncle Joe Stalin would have liked you except for that LBGT stuff. Stalin was all man and wanted nothing to do with gays. Similar to why Bad Vlad has such a low opinion of the bi-sexual Obama who forces gay US ambassadors down the throats of Muslim and other third world nations just to rub it in their faces. You know those cultures are hostile to gays. They don't have the tolerance we have here for these yoyos be they Bruce Jenner or whatever is in sexual fashion these days.

    Remember: There is no imperialism like Islamic imperialism and colonialism. Read up on Islam's bloody historical record when you have the time. It all started with Muhammad's first bloody wars of conquest in 622AD. His armies also fought for booty, the spoils of war and to procure female sex slaves same as ISIS does today.
    So contrary to your thinking it is correct to judge Islamic war making by how they did it 14 centuries ago because they are still using the same tactics. Especially terrorism.

    The statement of Muhammad: “I have been made victorious with terror.” The Hadith, collected by Bukhari (4.52.220) goes as follows:
    Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
    http://www.exmuslim.org/i-have-been-made-victorious-by-terror.html
     

    Islamic terrorism, however, did not start in 9/11 of 2001, nor did it start with the Iranian Islamic Revolution in 1979. Islamic terrorism has its origin in the sayings and examples set by Muhammad.

    In the last ten years of his life, after Muhammad migrated to Medina , he launched no less than 78 raids called qazwa (raid, ambush, sudden attack). Some of these qazwas involved the assassination of one opponent by one or a group of volunteers, and others were carried out by hundreds or thousands of warriors. Nonetheless a common characteristic of all Muhammad’s incursions was that they were done without notice. The enemy was caught off guard without being given the chance to prepare himself or be armed. As such all Muhammad’s victims were civilians.
    http://faithfreedom.org/challenge/terrorist.htm
     

    Saddam was just a ‘neighborhood bully,’ Netanyahu says– 13 years after saying Saddam threatened ‘security of our entire world’ – See more at: http://mondoweiss.net/2015/11/neighborhood-netanyahu-threatened#sthash.NnhQ8s83.dpuf

    The deception by Hipru ( Hebrew ) against Cannanite and later against Persian still ring so recent , poignant ,and fresh . Nothing has changed even the selecting “other” to carry out the task..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde
    There are 1.5 billion Muslims and they are invading Europe right now. There are 15 million Jews with about 6 million in Israel. What is the real threat to the world? Crazy nuked up Muslims in Iran and other nations or 6 million Zionist Jews in Israel?
    40 million Muslims have invaded Europe and most are are bleeding dry the European welfare systems. Due to centuries old Islamic colonialism and imperialism they just will not leave Israel alone. Then you have the world's leftist social justice warriors hating Israel too and aligning themselves with the great Muslim Jihad. Commies and Muslims in bed together, making common cause.
    Europe = a slow Jihad situation
    Israel = a fast Jihad situation
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. Moi says:

    Phil,

    You know Obama will ignore your advice, instead he will again do a Lewinsky on B. Nutty.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  112. Rurik says:
    @Ronald Thomas West
    Hey again Hasbara, how clever you imagine yourself, detracting from the whole of my initial comment, reproduced in full here:

    “Please, someone respond”

    Ok, I’ll bite. Clearly you’re not familiar with the article’s author and the people commenting or willfully choose not to notice there are people commenting other than anti-Semites, including Hasbara posing as anti-Semites who’re present to smear the article’s author with guilt by association for calling out Netanyahu on his BS. As well there are Jews who disapprove of Israeli policy and hate Netanyahu (e.g. Sam Shama), Goyim who disapprove of Israeli policy who’re NOT anti-Semites and are NOT opposed to the state of Israel in per se (e.g. JR who expects behaviors from Israel conformed to the rules of international law.)

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/11/11/kafka-the-human-zoo/

    ^ My recent two cents on a great Jewish thinker radical Zionism wishes to claim; contrasted to a more primitive mindset (Jew & Goy alike), it’s not a simplistic black & white subject no matter what certain cretins would prefer & pretend -

    ***

    Meanwhile, glad to see you whine about becoming part of that 'great White minority' having to move over and make some room -

    Hey Custer,

    Kafka was indeed a genius, and an extraordinary man

    I didn’t comment your initial comment because I have no issue with it

    I did however comment on the bizarre theory that suggested that all things of ‘freedom and beauty’ are somehow negated by white people’s ‘narcissistic anthropomorphic expectation’. It just sounded a little out there, Custer.

    And I guess I was a little bored. Wanted to stir the pot a little. ; )

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. @Clyde
    Obama is yesterday's papers to Netanyahu who would have preferred to skip the meeting. But when in Washintoon DC you can't skip out on a presidential summons. Obama needed this meet to give off the appearance of being even handed after screwing Israel on Iran and in countless other ways. Obama is as anti-Semitic as Louis Farrakhan who he interacted with while living in Chicago.

    Obama has been replaced. Netanyahu has been sidling up to Bad Vlad who looks like he/Russia will be providing cover and protection for a colossal Israeli developed (along with Texas Noble Energy) natural gas field off the Israeli coast. The Israelis don't want to spend billions on natgas infrastructure then have it under constant rocket and missile bombardment by psychos of the Hamas and Hezbollah persuasions.
    So it looks like Israel will under the developing Middle Eastern Pax Russ. Power abhors vacuums, so while Obama has been shrinking the US role there, Bad Vlad is expanding Russia's in Syria, Iran, Israel and so on.

    There’s nothing bad about Russian President Vladimir Putin, Clyde; he brought Russia out of dire poverty under the drunkard Boris Yeltsin by clearing out the mostly Jewish oligarchs that had been bleeding the country dry by pillaging the Treasury and restoring Russia to its Orthodox Christian roots.
    In addition, Putin has overhauled Russia’s military to the point where no adversary .. even the USSA .. is able to defeat. To top it off, he didn’t need a huge budget with which to accomplish this feat. Russia’s weapons systems .. both defensive and offensive .. are superior, bar none; its fighter and bomber jets are superior .. as are its tanks and submarines.
    Also, in any meetings/dealings with Bibi, Putin didn’t hesitate to put Israel’s dictator in his place; whereas, in his most recent meeting with Bibi, Obama just about gave away the USSA store to him. And, guess what .. Teleprompter Barry never even once asked for our permission. That’s how much he hates America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde
    I have a thousand times more respect for Vlad Putin than for Obama. Putin is a nationalist who loves his people.
    Obama by the way is featured this month in Out Magazine. A gay publication. Obama's photo is on the cover and he has an interview inside.
    Putin is laughing at this anti-Israel idiot.
    http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/11/11/455630392/obama-featured-on-the-cover-of-lgbt-magazine-out
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. @Ronald Thomas West
    "Please, someone respond"

    Ok, I'll bite. Clearly you're not familiar with the article's author and the people commenting or willfully choose not to notice there are people commenting other than anti-Semites, including Hasbara posing as anti-Semites who're present to smear the article's author with guilt by association for calling out Netanyahu on his BS. As well there are Jews who disapprove of Israeli policy and hate Netanyahu (e.g. Sam Shama), Goyim who disapprove of Israeli policy who're NOT anti-Semites and are NOT opposed to the state of Israel in per se (e.g. JR who expects behaviors from Israel conformed to the rules of international law.)

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/11/11/kafka-the-human-zoo/

    ^ My recent two cents on a great Jewish thinker radical Zionism wishes to claim; contrasted to a more primitive mindset (Jew & Goy alike), it's not a simplistic black & white subject no matter what certain cretins would prefer & pretend -

    Thanks for the info, Ronald. Not sure I understand much of it such as calling out Netanyahu on his BS.(?) Also, radical Zionism. What does this mean?… Over here in the States we hear screaming and shouting at Israel for being mean & cruel to the people who are trying to obliterate them and Jerusalem off the face of the Earth. Doesn’t seem to make sense.

    I love the photo in your article Kafka & The Human Zoo. The photo reminds me of Detroit circa 2015. I was born in Detroit on the inside of the fence. 50 years later all us white people are on the outside of the sharp stick fence. As I see it, African Americans moved in, whites moved out and behold a similar human zoo was created.

    Thanks again,

    *

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    ".... the people who are trying to obliterate them and Jerusalem off the face of the Earth. "

    I.M. - TRY TO STAY AWAY FROM THE KOOL-AID......
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. Rurik says:
    @Fran Macadam
    "This more than offsets the hate-filled anti-Israel propaganda from fringe Holocaust deniers like Giraldi."

    There are definitely comments here that are overtly antisemitic, so exaggerated and over the top, that I wonder whether they are from genuinely unhinged people who hate "the Jews" pathologically, or are from Hasbara opportunists who seek to create an impression of guilt by association for anyone who offers needed critique of the Likudnik faction's policies.

    As for my comment about history being more fair were Germans subjected to the treatment that Palestinians receive instead by proxy, even the Likud Israeli Prime Minister's recent comments reveal as much. He said that the Germans didn't want to gas Jews; that was the device of Palestinians. Since even the German leadership corrected him with the information that it was indeed Germans who thought it up, Mr. Netanyahu is clearly making Palestinians hapless stand-ins for the Germans.

    Without the German program of genocide against Jews, accompanied by the wholly inadequate response to it by the rest of the gentile world, there would currently be no Israel as currently constituted. Its creation is the byproduct of the consequences of two world wars and the Holocaust.

    The Palestinians displaced through a lesser form of ethnic cleansing to give Jewish settlers living space are those who are suffering the consequences for the war crimes that Germany as a nation committed from the 1930s, once ruled by the Nazis with popular support.

    One notion of justice is that the evil that one plans for others, comes back on one instead. In this case, Germany has escaped most consequences, notably because of its usefulness for the proxy wars with the Soviet Union. The head of West German intelligence was a notorious Nazi protected by the west and catapulted into that useful position.

    The Palestinians, without financial clout or political importance, were seen as disposable, their displacement the useful path of least resistance. Of course, no people really are disposable and eventually the chickens come home to roost, or described in realistic Chalmers Johnson terms, blowback.

    Hello Fran,

    As for my comment about history being more fair were Germans subjected to the treatment that Palestinians receive instead by proxy, even the Likud Israeli Prime Minister’s recent comments reveal as much

    OK, so you weren’t being facetious. You do feel it would be fair for the German people today to suffer what the Palestinians suffer. You do feel that people are guilty of the crimes of their ancestors. And that they should be made to pay. Even if they had no part in it.

    Since even the German leadership corrected him with the information that it was indeed Germans who thought it up,

    In case you haven’t noticed the German government today is one of the most completely and absolutely occupied by the Zionists and Jewish power structure. A German politician doesn’t fart unless he’s sure it’s OK with the Jews, even more so than England or the US or Israel, for that matter. I think the only government more slavishly under the boot of the Zionists, is.. well, there isn’t one. So when the German government (or media) tells the world that the German people are guilty for all time for the Holocaust, (much of which is lies) we are not hearing precisely from people who are representing the interests of the German people without prejudice.

    Without the German program of genocide against Jews, accompanied by the wholly inadequate response to it by the rest of the gentile world,

    let me help you out here, what you mean to say is the Nazi program of genocide. OK? There is a difference, even if you have been inundated with decades of anti-German propaganda. If you want to blame the German people for all perpetuity because of the crimes of a government they had 70+ years ago, then you have to blame all people everywhere for the crimes of some obscure people who lived long ago and did terrible things to others during war. That pretty much encompasses us all.

    The Palestinians displaced through a lesser form of ethnic cleansing to give Jewish settlers living space are those who are suffering the consequences for the war crimes that Germany as a nation committed from the 1930s, once ruled by the Nazis with popular support.

    now the displacement (and slaughter) of the Palestinians from their own ancient lands is a “lesser” form of ethnic cleansing. And if you didn’t know, it was the Jews who wanted and coveted that land. The Germans didn’t force them to go there. It was Jewish terrorists who slaughtered their way across Palestine and drove those people out of their homes and villages. But now somehow all of that genocidal terror and butchery is now the direct fault of a German child born today.

    One notion of justice is that the evil that one plans for others, comes back on one instead.

    But Fran, all the Nazis are dead. Punishing a race (out of pure hate) for the crimes of what a few of them did is exactly what the Nazi did. Do you understand that? It’s what the Zionists do to Gaza when they bomb them indiscriminately for a so called rocket attack. To say the Germans should be genocided and displaced and tormented by Jewish sadists is the same evil mentality that the Nazis and Zionists were and are engaged in, respectively.

    No one deserved to be punished for the crimes of others. A child born in America today does not deserve to suffer for the myriad and unprecedented crimes that the US government is committing today. Russians today should not be punished for the crimes of Stalin. Vietnamese children should not be punished for the crimes of Pol Pot, Chinese should not be punished for the crimes of Mao. But some of us can’t get past our hate. We want to heap blame and guilt upon others, not for anything that they’ve done, but for what they look like. It’s sad and pathetic.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Fran Macadam
    Notice I said "fairer" not "fair." But we all know, life's not fair.
    And in no way do I subscribe to a particular demonization of Jews, nor of Palestinians, nor Germans.
    On the other hand, those who benefit from the crimes of their forebears, can't reap the benefits without being called to account. After all, it was precisely the claim to benefit posterity that was used by German leadership to justify the hard means they had chosen. Those who carried out the policies suffered bouts of conscience only subsumed by drunkenness and active pep talks by authorities about how their sacrifices were for the better future of mankind.
    , @schmenz
    Well stated, Rurik.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. @Rurik
    Hello Fran,

    As for my comment about history being more fair were Germans subjected to the treatment that Palestinians receive instead by proxy, even the Likud Israeli Prime Minister’s recent comments reveal as much
     
    OK, so you weren't being facetious. You do feel it would be fair for the German people today to suffer what the Palestinians suffer. You do feel that people are guilty of the crimes of their ancestors. And that they should be made to pay. Even if they had no part in it.

    Since even the German leadership corrected him with the information that it was indeed Germans who thought it up,
     
    In case you haven't noticed the German government today is one of the most completely and absolutely occupied by the Zionists and Jewish power structure. A German politician doesn't fart unless he's sure it's OK with the Jews, even more so than England or the US or Israel, for that matter. I think the only government more slavishly under the boot of the Zionists, is.. well, there isn't one. So when the German government (or media) tells the world that the German people are guilty for all time for the Holocaust, (much of which is lies) we are not hearing precisely from people who are representing the interests of the German people without prejudice.

    Without the German program of genocide against Jews, accompanied by the wholly inadequate response to it by the rest of the gentile world,
     
    let me help you out here, what you mean to say is the Nazi program of genocide. OK? There is a difference, even if you have been inundated with decades of anti-German propaganda. If you want to blame the German people for all perpetuity because of the crimes of a government they had 70+ years ago, then you have to blame all people everywhere for the crimes of some obscure people who lived long ago and did terrible things to others during war. That pretty much encompasses us all.

    The Palestinians displaced through a lesser form of ethnic cleansing to give Jewish settlers living space are those who are suffering the consequences for the war crimes that Germany as a nation committed from the 1930s, once ruled by the Nazis with popular support.
     
    now the displacement (and slaughter) of the Palestinians from their own ancient lands is a "lesser" form of ethnic cleansing. And if you didn't know, it was the Jews who wanted and coveted that land. The Germans didn't force them to go there. It was Jewish terrorists who slaughtered their way across Palestine and drove those people out of their homes and villages. But now somehow all of that genocidal terror and butchery is now the direct fault of a German child born today.

    One notion of justice is that the evil that one plans for others, comes back on one instead.
     
    But Fran, all the Nazis are dead. Punishing a race (out of pure hate) for the crimes of what a few of them did is exactly what the Nazi did. Do you understand that? It's what the Zionists do to Gaza when they bomb them indiscriminately for a so called rocket attack. To say the Germans should be genocided and displaced and tormented by Jewish sadists is the same evil mentality that the Nazis and Zionists were and are engaged in, respectively.

    No one deserved to be punished for the crimes of others. A child born in America today does not deserve to suffer for the myriad and unprecedented crimes that the US government is committing today. Russians today should not be punished for the crimes of Stalin. Vietnamese children should not be punished for the crimes of Pol Pot, Chinese should not be punished for the crimes of Mao. But some of us can't get past our hate. We want to heap blame and guilt upon others, not for anything that they've done, but for what they look like. It's sad and pathetic.

    Notice I said “fairer” not “fair.” But we all know, life’s not fair.
    And in no way do I subscribe to a particular demonization of Jews, nor of Palestinians, nor Germans.
    On the other hand, those who benefit from the crimes of their forebears, can’t reap the benefits without being called to account. After all, it was precisely the claim to benefit posterity that was used by German leadership to justify the hard means they had chosen. Those who carried out the policies suffered bouts of conscience only subsumed by drunkenness and active pep talks by authorities about how their sacrifices were for the better future of mankind.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    On the other hand, those who benefit from the crimes of their forebears, can’t reap the benefits without being called to account.
     
    The German people have hardly reaped benefits from the antics of the Nazis. In a war that Hitler and the German people did not want, they had their country bombed into smoking ruins, their people burned alive by the hundreds of thousands in places like Dresden and Hamburg, millions upon millions of them starved to death after the war was over. Hundreds of thousands of German men were enslaved after the war and held in bondage for years. Millions of German women were brutally raped and Germany was ground down into the dust of abject misery and despair for years after the war. Occupied by hate-consumed brutes and thugs from both the east and the west, German teenage boys were murdered off en masse in POW camps due to exposure and starvation. Their country was looted and their women disgraced. But perhaps most of all, and worst of all, the German people have been relentlessly excoriated as evil people for a Holocaust that is more lies than truth.

    And after all of this and during an occupation that continues today.. because the German people are congenitally hard working and intelligent and have rebuilt their country from its ashes, they accused of having benefited from the war. Amazing isn't it?

    it was precisely the claim to benefit posterity that was used by German leadership to justify the hard means they had chosen.
     
    that hard means would have never have happened were it not for the treachery and hatred that the German people and nation had suffered from the allies after the first world war. It was France and Belgium and England and Russia and especially Poland who forced WWII by continuing to treat the German people under their occupation with savagery and racial hatred. (much like the Palestinians suffer today) I'm no apologist for the Nazis, but they didn't want that war. It was forced upon them by yes, Jewish bankers who had funded Trotsky and Lenin and Stalin and the whole communist insanity and owned FDR and Churchill outright, just like they do the British and US politicians today. But we never hear that side of the story do we, only the relentless blood libels against the German people.

    The Nazis did persecute innocent people, but they were taught the lessons of treachery and injustice by the consummate masters of treachery and injustice; the hose of Rothschild and the British aristocracy, and the other demonic scum from the allied powers. And when it comes to murderous evil and contempt for innocent life, there are none that compare to the nemeses of the Nazis, good ol Uncle Joe Stalin. But we never hear about all of that, do we Fran. It's all evil Germans all day long. And always nothing but innocent Jews and victims of the Nazis who were just playing violins and minding their own business.

    So, I just like to point out the stuff we never hear about, because it's all happening again Fran. Germany is today being invaded and forced into civil war just like it was in the thirties, and just like the thirties, all the German people (and the rest of the sane Europeans) who object to being inundated with Muslims are accused of being Nazis and racists. And just like in the thirties, the ones foisting all of this madness and hate and strife are yep, you guessed it, the same ones who funded Trotsky and Lenin. The British and US bankers. The EU and the boyz at the ECB. And the only reason they're able to get away with all of this evil is because of the knee-jerk mind set of the sheeple in the west and Europe who're afraid of saying anything lest someone call them a Nazi or a racist. And this will not end well Fran. Not at all. So I would posit that we should all at least have some historical perspective to all of this, because it's deja vu all over again.

    I'm ranting again..

    (it's what I do ; )

    I'll leave you with this German politician whom I'm sure you would pat on the head as one of the very few 'good Germans'. When he say Nazis as he's referring to Germans, he reminds me of you ; )

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riQh4Qpvxm4
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. Old Jew says:

    Mr. Giraldi,

    You wrote:

    “…. Netanyahu has proposed expelling thousands of Palestinians from East Jerusalem, where they and their ancestors have lived for centuries”.

    Could you be more precise?

    Who are these families?

    There are 300 thousand East-Jerusalemites. How were these particular thousand selected?

    Where will they go (Syria? Jordan? Gaza?). Has the UN prepared the tents?

    You are a journalist. Don’t let yourself be duped.

    What I understand is that there were some outlying Palestinian villages that the Jerusalem municipality declared to be part of Greater Jerusalem.

    It gave them an advantage over other West-Bank (Occupied Palestine) villages.

    They could receive Israeli citizenship (which these patriotic Palestinians refused) or an Israeli ID (which no Palestinian refused, because it entitled them to welfare checks, medicaid, and right to travel/work all over Israel with Israeli license plates).

    Most of the heroic Youth that participated in the knife attacks, came from two or three of such villages.

    Netanyahu did not propose that people be removed from their houses/land.

    He suggested that these villages be removed from within the borders of Municipal Jerusalem
    and return to the status of occupied Palestine.

    About half of the families in these villages live under the Israeli poverty levels and thus receive payments (the equivalent of Welfare Checks and Medicaid in the USA).

    It happens because they have so many children [... Allah (or the State of Israel) will provide...]

    The Israeli viewpoint: What is the point to feed / cure families whose children are out to slaughter you?

    Will it happen?

    Most likely not.

    Israel has so many layers of bureaucracy, courts, appeals, etc., .

    Netanyahu may propose, but it is bound to come to nothing.

    So Mr. Giraldi, please use the verb “expel” only when family are actually removed, not when municipal boundaries may be modified.

    Israel has plenty real flaws. No point to pile up imaginary crimes.

    SF

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  118. RobinG says:
    @Invisible man
    Thanks for the info, Ronald. Not sure I understand much of it such as calling out Netanyahu on his BS.(?) Also, radical Zionism. What does this mean?... Over here in the States we hear screaming and shouting at Israel for being mean & cruel to the people who are trying to obliterate them and Jerusalem off the face of the Earth. Doesn't seem to make sense.

    I love the photo in your article Kafka & The Human Zoo. The photo reminds me of Detroit circa 2015. I was born in Detroit on the inside of the fence. 50 years later all us white people are on the outside of the sharp stick fence. As I see it, African Americans moved in, whites moved out and behold a similar human zoo was created.

    Thanks again,

    *

    “…. the people who are trying to obliterate them and Jerusalem off the face of the Earth. ”

    I.M. – TRY TO STAY AWAY FROM THE KOOL-AID……

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62
    Who knew stone throwing was that effective?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. geokat62 says:
    @RobinG
    ".... the people who are trying to obliterate them and Jerusalem off the face of the Earth. "

    I.M. - TRY TO STAY AWAY FROM THE KOOL-AID......

    Who knew stone throwing was that effective?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. […] 11, 2015 “Information Clearing House” – “Unz Review” – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is currently making one of his periodic […]

    Read More
  121. […] “Unz Review” – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is currently making one of his periodic devastating plundering raids on Washington and New York. During his visit he discreetly picked up a bunch of large checks from the Wall Street crowd, benefited from the plaudits dutifully delivered by the media and chattering class and has even met with President Barack Obama, whom he quite openly despises. Netanyahu and Obama carefully concealed their mutual dislike when in front of the cameras but the president also made all the right noises about Israel’s security “needs.” Apparently all the violence occurring in Israel-Palestine is the fault of the Palestinians and Israel always has the right to do whatever it wants to defend itself. Obama will follow up on the meeting by throwing billions of dollars of additional Danegeld at Netanyahu as a token of America’s undying love and fealty to Israel’s interests. […]

    Read More
  122. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Marais
    Thanks for the links (I’m woefully behind reading the Economist). Larry Summers, Richardson, and ‘WW4’ Wolsey too! It just keeps getting better and better. Does FNC still have Saudi prince Al-Waleed bin Talal as major investor?
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:
    @Art

    I could not BELIEVE during the GOP debate last night that John Kasich said the following words, “In Israel, we have no better ally in the world. No more criticizing them in public. We should support them.”
     
    What an outrage - Kasich lost it - he is through. We are hearing less and less “I’ll call Bibi on the first day of my presidency and give away the store.” I think the blind support for Israel is not an automatic winner with everyone anymore. I think that there is a voting constituency that does not like the control Jews hold over America.

    If Rand Paul would find the gonads to routinely use the word “neocon” and make more anti-war statements – guaranteed he could make it to the Republican convention.

    I think that there is a voting constituency that does not like the control Jews hold over America.

    There is a voting constituency that does not like the control Zionists hold over America.

    Kasich is NOT Jewish, he is Protestant. The majority of our Congressmen are NOT Jewish, but they ARE Zionists. Be it for personal gain or religious reasons, they are Zionists because they seek to further the Political Agenda of Zionism. Not all Jewish people are Zionists and not all Zionists are Jewish. By your blaming of a religion, Judaism, instead of blaming the political ideology, Zionism, you are not only misdirecting your blame but you are also giving a free pass to all the non-Jewish Zionists. And there are a LOT of them.

    Zionism is support for the State of Israel. Zionists will TRY to make you believe that all Jewish people are Zionists but this is false. Zionism is NOT Judaism. Our problem is not Judaism. The problem is our support for the State of Israel, aka Zionism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    "The majority of our Congressmen are NOT Jewish, but they ARE Zionists."

    Well, the majority of our Congressmen are kowtowing to politically organized Jews, i.e. AIPAC, CFIJA, CFI, LFI, CRIF etc’. Even J-Street is primarily dedicated to a jewish supremacist Israel.

    “The wealthy Jews control the world, in their hands lies the fate of governments and nations. They set governments one against the other. When the wealthy Jews play, the nations and the rulers dance. One way or the other, they get rich.” (Theodor Herzl, Deutsche Zeitung)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. KA [AKA "Carthage"] says:
    @Ivan
    The Hindu buggers got it from Will Durant who was of the pre-internet age. Muslim conquerors were responsible for genocides as can be read from Crowds and Power by Elias.Canetti. But they could never have anywhere near 80 millions. The population at the turn of the 20th century was about 1 billion. Extrapolate it back to see if this figure is plausible. Not everything done in the name of Islam is due to the Arabs and Persians. The Mongols who devastated Baghdad were pretty much in action in India too.

    India is interesting in many ways .
    Today’s NYT on page B1-India Facing Climate Change,
    ” 30% of the world’s poorest call it home living less than 1.90 dollar a day. 304 million don’t have access to electricity ;92 million have no access to safe drinking water ”
    Against this statistics,how do the countries in turmoil in Middle East compare? How did the countries in Latin America compare?
    Both Christianity and Islam freed the poor,the indigent,the downtrodden to think beyond what was told and what was explained to them by the God ‘s own class- the self defined and self -appointed elite and High Priest . They did not accept the arrangement by the rulrs , they did not stay beholden to the imposed dispensation . They revolted .

    In India,these poor think that it is their fate .They are told to love and enjoy it ( sometime back Narendra Modi told that these poor actually enjoyed serving the rich,doing the menial job )

    This is why India doesn’t engage in revolt . They had to get converted to Islam,Christinity,Buddhism or Communist to think that they are human being .This is one of the reason of targeted anger against Christianity in Northern India .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ivan
    India with 1.2 billions is a world by itself. There are countless races and religions holding the balance in a matrix of forces and co-operation. This is the way most Indians, like myself like it. It ensures for one thing that we don't get the kind of "development" that China had with its mass starvations. We have our freedoms, with no thanks to the RSS-BJP combine. The majority of Indians have a live and let live attitude, but the Hindu fascists want to target the minority Muslims and Christians in order to pursue their agenda of a neverland of Hindu purity based on partly on cow-worship. The majority of Indians, Hindu or otherwise don't buy it as can be seen from the elections in Bihar.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. “The simple solution to the attacks would be for Israel to give up its endless and endlessly brutal occupation of the West Bank as well as its siege of Gaza. The knifings would end.”

    My guess is there probably has been maybe three or four actual unprovoked (in the immediate sense) knife attacks by the natives on the Hebrew-speaking Boers. The rest are simple murders by Jews passed off as self-defense. Notice all the “light injuries?” WTF is a “light injury” anyway? A sprained ankle from running like a pussy when someone yells “terrorsts?”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  126. L.K says:

    Everybody, but perhaps Americans above all, should take the time to watch the following:

    Jeffrey Blankfort(who, btw, is Jewish) – Are there Israel lobby gatekeepers and damage control squads on the Left?

    Alison Weir: Findings from the new book “Against Our Better Judgement”

    Grant Smith: A brief history of Israeli foreign agent, smuggling & spy cases.

    Ernie Gallo: The U.S.S Liberty: what really happened? What did not?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  127. KA [AKA "carthage"] says:
    @Clyde
    You are a super commie. You have thrown everything into the blender with that one. Have you ever met a national liberation movement you didn't like? Uncle Joe Stalin would have liked you except for that LBGT stuff. Stalin was all man and wanted nothing to do with gays. Similar to why Bad Vlad has such a low opinion of the bi-sexual Obama who forces gay US ambassadors down the throats of Muslim and other third world nations just to rub it in their faces. You know those cultures are hostile to gays. They don't have the tolerance we have here for these yoyos be they Bruce Jenner or whatever is in sexual fashion these days.

    Remember: There is no imperialism like Islamic imperialism and colonialism. Read up on Islam's bloody historical record when you have the time. It all started with Muhammad's first bloody wars of conquest in 622AD. His armies also fought for booty, the spoils of war and to procure female sex slaves same as ISIS does today.
    So contrary to your thinking it is correct to judge Islamic war making by how they did it 14 centuries ago because they are still using the same tactics. Especially terrorism.

    The statement of Muhammad: “I have been made victorious with terror.” The Hadith, collected by Bukhari (4.52.220) goes as follows:
    Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
    http://www.exmuslim.org/i-have-been-made-victorious-by-terror.html
     

    Islamic terrorism, however, did not start in 9/11 of 2001, nor did it start with the Iranian Islamic Revolution in 1979. Islamic terrorism has its origin in the sayings and examples set by Muhammad.

    In the last ten years of his life, after Muhammad migrated to Medina , he launched no less than 78 raids called qazwa (raid, ambush, sudden attack). Some of these qazwas involved the assassination of one opponent by one or a group of volunteers, and others were carried out by hundreds or thousands of warriors. Nonetheless a common characteristic of all Muhammad’s incursions was that they were done without notice. The enemy was caught off guard without being given the chance to prepare himself or be armed. As such all Muhammad’s victims were civilians.
    http://faithfreedom.org/challenge/terrorist.htm
     

    “Empires cost money, and the price of ours – which in based on the principle of everything goes out and nothing comes in – is exorbitantly high. Which is probably what led Center for American Progress head honcho Neera Tanden, who is close to Hillary Clinton, to propose charging countries that we invade and conquer for the costs of subjugating and occupying them. Tanden proposed – seriously – that we seize Libya’s oil as the price for “liberating” them, i.e. turning their country into a terrorist version of Disney World.

    “Empires cost money, and the price of ours – which in based on the principle of everything goes out and nothing comes in – is exorbitantly high. Which is probably what led Center for American Progress head honcho Neera Tanden, who is close to Hillary Clinton, to propose charging countries that we invade and conquer for the costs of subjugating and occupying them. Tanden proposed – seriously – that we seize Libya’s oil as the price for “liberating” them, i.e. turning their country into a terrorist version of Disney World.

    http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2015/11/10/the-enemy-within/


    Did it originate from Neera Tnfen or dd she borrow it from Wolfowitz ? Or may be she borrowed it from Trump
    This is better,perfected version of imperialism.
    I wonder why she didnot demand for the soldiers from those countries also to fight ,occupy and thus spare the Americn lives

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. @Fran Macadam
    "This more than offsets the hate-filled anti-Israel propaganda from fringe Holocaust deniers like Giraldi."

    There are definitely comments here that are overtly antisemitic, so exaggerated and over the top, that I wonder whether they are from genuinely unhinged people who hate "the Jews" pathologically, or are from Hasbara opportunists who seek to create an impression of guilt by association for anyone who offers needed critique of the Likudnik faction's policies.

    As for my comment about history being more fair were Germans subjected to the treatment that Palestinians receive instead by proxy, even the Likud Israeli Prime Minister's recent comments reveal as much. He said that the Germans didn't want to gas Jews; that was the device of Palestinians. Since even the German leadership corrected him with the information that it was indeed Germans who thought it up, Mr. Netanyahu is clearly making Palestinians hapless stand-ins for the Germans.

    Without the German program of genocide against Jews, accompanied by the wholly inadequate response to it by the rest of the gentile world, there would currently be no Israel as currently constituted. Its creation is the byproduct of the consequences of two world wars and the Holocaust.

    The Palestinians displaced through a lesser form of ethnic cleansing to give Jewish settlers living space are those who are suffering the consequences for the war crimes that Germany as a nation committed from the 1930s, once ruled by the Nazis with popular support.

    One notion of justice is that the evil that one plans for others, comes back on one instead. In this case, Germany has escaped most consequences, notably because of its usefulness for the proxy wars with the Soviet Union. The head of West German intelligence was a notorious Nazi protected by the west and catapulted into that useful position.

    The Palestinians, without financial clout or political importance, were seen as disposable, their displacement the useful path of least resistance. Of course, no people really are disposable and eventually the chickens come home to roost, or described in realistic Chalmers Johnson terms, blowback.

    some time ago Giraldi explained that Fran Macadam was an old friend.

    perhaps Giraldi the historian can correct his old friend’s historical failures revealed in this comment:

    [A] Without the German program of genocide against Jews, [B] accompanied by the wholly inadequate response to it by the rest of the gentile world, there would [C} currently be no Israel as currently constituted.

    I. The chronological failures:
    1. Israel "as currently constituted" was conceived and gestated beginning in the first decade of the 20th century. The German Warburgs, the international banking family Rothschild, and other German-born and German-educated experts established the core institutions of "Israel as currently constituted," including acquiring some of the most fertile land in the region, the Jezreal valley, and building Tel Aviv, by 1910.
    No holocaust in sight in 1910, other than in Rabbi Stephen Wise's preaching.

    2. By 1917 Chaim Weizmann had secured the Balfour Declaration, the pledge of the British government to "look with favour on the establishment of a homeland for Jews in Palestine," -- a pledge addressed to Baron Rothschild by which the world's then-mightiest empire extended security guarantees to the zionist colonization project.
    1917 and still no holocaust in sight.

    3. In 1937 David Ben Gurion wrote to his son to the effect that the small footprint that Jews had in Palestine "as an outcome of the Great War" did not satisfy the intentions of the zionist colonizers but would do until the plans for expansion could be fully implemented.

    Also by 1937, zionist Jews had built luxury residences for Chaim Weizmann and the Schocken family in Rehovath; had built Hebrew University and a medical center also in Rehovath. Erich Mendelsohn, "the Jewish architect" who designed and built those institutions created the international style of housing and other buildings that dominated Palestine-turning-into-Israel; by 1937 zionist settlers had established governing bodies, banks, unions, kibbutzes, farms, schools and roads in the zionist project in Palestine. "Israel" had many of the institutions of a state; it was lacking only a declaration of statehood, declared boundaries, and a constitution.
    Still no holocaust.

    In a meeting on June 11, 1944 of the Jewish Agency in Tel Aviv, headed by David Ben Gurion, the Agency asserted that "Auschwitz is a labor camp," and they elected to refrain from asking the Allies to "bomb Auschwitz" lest "a single Jewish person be harmed." (source; a paper by Rafael Medoff of Wyman Institute).

    Israel self-declared itself in 1948. Israel has not yet declared boundaries nor a constitution.
    That declaration was preceded by an alleged holocaust of Jews and coincided with the mass transfer of millions of ethnic Germans and Russians, many of them to their deaths, as well as the dispossession of an estimated 700,000 residents of Palestine and the killing of thousands more of Palestinians by well-armed and organized Jewish militias and terror organizations.

    Thus, Fran Macadam's chronology is backward: C. came before A, (to the extent A. has truth-value), and B. is a vicious slur on the American people.

    II. Failures in cause-effect:

    1. If the above timeline is irrefutably true, and it is, then it cannot be said that a "German program of genocide" caused the constitution of the zionist project in Palestine: an effect cannot occur before its causality. Thus, zionism caused Nazism.

    2. Fran Macadam seems to agree with Robert Cohen that persons such as this commenter who question the illogic and implausibility of the holocaust narrative are on the "fringe;" Cohen wrote:

    Holocaust denial will remain a fringe issue. The documentation is secure in its veracity and overwhelming in its volume. If anything, today’s school children are in danger of thinking that Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin went to war against Hitler because of what was happening to the Jews. - http://mondoweiss.net/2015/01/auschwitz-revisited#sthash.rWtU7hOj.dpuf

    As well, Fran Macadam is squarely in the camp of those "school children [who] are in danger thinking” what Cohen implies is a totally wrong apprehension of reality — that “Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin went to war against Hitler because of what was happening to the Jews.”

    The question, Why did “Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin go to war against Hitler” is left unanswered, despite “documentation [that] is secure in its veracity and overwhelming in its volume” — but which, as Prof. Kathy Peiss reports, also has been pilfered, filtered, censored and destroyed by Jewish persons such as her uncle and other Allied agents.

    III. When so much is at stake, it’s extremely important to get the facts and logic right.
    Fran Macadam’s statement fails on all counts.
    If ordinary critical analysis is now the equivalent of ‘holocaust denial,” then call me Fringe and unhinged. The alternative is to live in the same bizarro world as Bibi Netanyahu.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. Rurik says:
    @Fran Macadam
    Notice I said "fairer" not "fair." But we all know, life's not fair.
    And in no way do I subscribe to a particular demonization of Jews, nor of Palestinians, nor Germans.
    On the other hand, those who benefit from the crimes of their forebears, can't reap the benefits without being called to account. After all, it was precisely the claim to benefit posterity that was used by German leadership to justify the hard means they had chosen. Those who carried out the policies suffered bouts of conscience only subsumed by drunkenness and active pep talks by authorities about how their sacrifices were for the better future of mankind.

    On the other hand, those who benefit from the crimes of their forebears, can’t reap the benefits without being called to account.

    The German people have hardly reaped benefits from the antics of the Nazis. In a war that Hitler and the German people did not want, they had their country bombed into smoking ruins, their people burned alive by the hundreds of thousands in places like Dresden and Hamburg, millions upon millions of them starved to death after the war was over. Hundreds of thousands of German men were enslaved after the war and held in bondage for years. Millions of German women were brutally raped and Germany was ground down into the dust of abject misery and despair for years after the war. Occupied by hate-consumed brutes and thugs from both the east and the west, German teenage boys were murdered off en masse in POW camps due to exposure and starvation. Their country was looted and their women disgraced. But perhaps most of all, and worst of all, the German people have been relentlessly excoriated as evil people for a Holocaust that is more lies than truth.

    And after all of this and during an occupation that continues today.. because the German people are congenitally hard working and intelligent and have rebuilt their country from its ashes, they accused of having benefited from the war. Amazing isn’t it?

    it was precisely the claim to benefit posterity that was used by German leadership to justify the hard means they had chosen.

    that hard means would have never have happened were it not for the treachery and hatred that the German people and nation had suffered from the allies after the first world war. It was France and Belgium and England and Russia and especially Poland who forced WWII by continuing to treat the German people under their occupation with savagery and racial hatred. (much like the Palestinians suffer today) I’m no apologist for the Nazis, but they didn’t want that war. It was forced upon them by yes, Jewish bankers who had funded Trotsky and Lenin and Stalin and the whole communist insanity and owned FDR and Churchill outright, just like they do the British and US politicians today. But we never hear that side of the story do we, only the relentless blood libels against the German people.

    The Nazis did persecute innocent people, but they were taught the lessons of treachery and injustice by the consummate masters of treachery and injustice; the hose of Rothschild and the British aristocracy, and the other demonic scum from the allied powers. And when it comes to murderous evil and contempt for innocent life, there are none that compare to the nemeses of the Nazis, good ol Uncle Joe Stalin. But we never hear about all of that, do we Fran. It’s all evil Germans all day long. And always nothing but innocent Jews and victims of the Nazis who were just playing violins and minding their own business.

    So, I just like to point out the stuff we never hear about, because it’s all happening again Fran. Germany is today being invaded and forced into civil war just like it was in the thirties, and just like the thirties, all the German people (and the rest of the sane Europeans) who object to being inundated with Muslims are accused of being Nazis and racists. And just like in the thirties, the ones foisting all of this madness and hate and strife are yep, you guessed it, the same ones who funded Trotsky and Lenin. The British and US bankers. The EU and the boyz at the ECB. And the only reason they’re able to get away with all of this evil is because of the knee-jerk mind set of the sheeple in the west and Europe who’re afraid of saying anything lest someone call them a Nazi or a racist. And this will not end well Fran. Not at all. So I would posit that we should all at least have some historical perspective to all of this, because it’s deja vu all over again.

    I’m ranting again..

    (it’s what I do ; )

    I’ll leave you with this German politician whom I’m sure you would pat on the head as one of the very few ‘good Germans’. When he say Nazis as he’s referring to Germans, he reminds me of you ; )

    Read More
    • Agree: SolontoCroesus
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Macadam
    If history were more fair, Germany would now be a Jewish State and ethnic Germans would be the ones living in the condition of Palestinians...

    Aha, the jew shows her true colors. Listen, Germany’s already repaid whatever debt they incurred to world jewry 6 million times over. They don’t owe you parasites a thing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. Ivan says:
    @KA
    India is interesting in many ways .
    Today's NYT on page B1-India Facing Climate Change,
    " 30% of the world's poorest call it home living less than 1.90 dollar a day. 304 million don't have access to electricity ;92 million have no access to safe drinking water "
    Against this statistics,how do the countries in turmoil in Middle East compare? How did the countries in Latin America compare?
    Both Christianity and Islam freed the poor,the indigent,the downtrodden to think beyond what was told and what was explained to them by the God 's own class- the self defined and self -appointed elite and High Priest . They did not accept the arrangement by the rulrs , they did not stay beholden to the imposed dispensation . They revolted .

    In India,these poor think that it is their fate .They are told to love and enjoy it ( sometime back Narendra Modi told that these poor actually enjoyed serving the rich,doing the menial job )

    This is why India doesn't engage in revolt . They had to get converted to Islam,Christinity,Buddhism or Communist to think that they are human being .This is one of the reason of targeted anger against Christianity in Northern India .

    India with 1.2 billions is a world by itself. There are countless races and religions holding the balance in a matrix of forces and co-operation. This is the way most Indians, like myself like it. It ensures for one thing that we don’t get the kind of “development” that China had with its mass starvations. We have our freedoms, with no thanks to the RSS-BJP combine. The majority of Indians have a live and let live attitude, but the Hindu fascists want to target the minority Muslims and Christians in order to pursue their agenda of a neverland of Hindu purity based on partly on cow-worship. The majority of Indians, Hindu or otherwise don’t buy it as can be seen from the elections in Bihar.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    Hello Ivan,
    I was in India recently on a business trip (Mumbai and Delhi). I found the country to be a fascinating mix of ultra-rich and poor, modernists and antiquarians, hyper-nationalists and globalists. The people were universally warm. (I also visited the synagogues in Mumbai and they were absolute jewels).

    Narendra Modi, appears to be a man of vision.

    I was impressed and convinced that the Indian economy presents an unique situation: a combination of IT-human-capital based growth and a huge and under-invested opportunity in infrastructure and medium to heavy industry.

    I hear that Bibi Netanyahu is about to visit New Delhi soon. Modi ought to be careful.

    I'd be interested in your views.
    , @KA
    I don't think the issue of tolerance is the problem for the millions holed up in the abyss of the poverty . Exclude Muslim and Christian and just focus on the poor among the broad spectrum of Hindu. Why is this silence why is this lack of movement,why is this blind acceptance of the condition?
    Its not that Indian poor have revolted. They have against British along with the rest and they have as recent as 2002 and 2013 against local Muslim in Gujrat and North Indian state near Delhi. But often these movements have been helmed by the upper caste .
    Most of the right against Muslim or Christian are carried out by poor equally marginilaizrd low caste Hindus . The agitation against mosque and churches and Muslim shrines from1987 have been carried out by the poor lower caste Hindus . All these agitations and violences happened at the instigation of upper caste ( through media, Videos,Policy decisions,focussed destruction of cottage business owned by Muslim , using security forces and public festivals ,theater ,nd TV serials ) One of the classis distraction was the riot that broke out in1990 after a high caste student immolated himself in fire to protest against newly created extra reservation for lower caste ( for votes) . To divert the attention BJP started nationwide movement against Muslim and the very same lower caste made it possible .
    But these lower caste as a group have never staked a claim that challenges the subliminal pervasive,diffuse psychological religious social control of Indian rich caste . They can only go after other lower caste after Muslim after Christian. This is in sharp contrast from the revolt people see in Africa. N Africa, Middle East . This has put them at a disadvantage because this weakness is internalized and is part of their defined existence .
    , @KA
    RSS is not India .Neither the Zionist can claim to represent all Jewish people . But majority just want to get along and keep to themselves

    I am sure large number of Hindus area aghast at this Fatwa -

    "NEW DELHI: RSS mouthpiece, Panchjanya, has justified the killing of Mohammad Akhlaq over rumours that he had eaten and stored beef in his house., in its latest edition has said the Vedas order the killing of 'sinners' who slaughter cows, reported Indian Express.

    The RSS weekly alleges that Muslim leadership teach Muslims to hate the Indian's traditions."

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/RSS-mouthpiece-says-Vedas-ordered-killing-of-cow-killers/articleshow/49437196.cms
    , @KA
    ". In his Karamyog (2007), Modi writes that those castes fated to do sanitation work (clean gutters, sweep houses and cart away refuse), such as the Balmikis, do so as an “experience in spirituality.” “I do not believe that they have been doing this job just to sustain their livelihood,” says Modi, who anoints them to this despicable work because it is their “duty to work for the happiness of the entire society.” "

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/11/on-the-wings-of-intolerance/

    It is no surprise that Modi enjoys so much following among rich Indian ,upper caste Indians and commands popularity and respects from Indian business communities . Cheap and voiceless labor are in plenty available on demand !
    But why do the poor ,indigent,and lower caste allow him or his party to get away with this racist condescending attitude?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. RobinG says:
    @Junior

    I think that there is a voting constituency that does not like the control Jews hold over America.
     
    There is a voting constituency that does not like the control Zionists hold over America.

    Kasich is NOT Jewish, he is Protestant. The majority of our Congressmen are NOT Jewish, but they ARE Zionists. Be it for personal gain or religious reasons, they are Zionists because they seek to further the Political Agenda of Zionism. Not all Jewish people are Zionists and not all Zionists are Jewish. By your blaming of a religion, Judaism, instead of blaming the political ideology, Zionism, you are not only misdirecting your blame but you are also giving a free pass to all the non-Jewish Zionists. And there are a LOT of them.

    Zionism is support for the State of Israel. Zionists will TRY to make you believe that all Jewish people are Zionists but this is false. Zionism is NOT Judaism. Our problem is not Judaism. The problem is our support for the State of Israel, aka Zionism.

    “The majority of our Congressmen are NOT Jewish, but they ARE Zionists.”

    Well, the majority of our Congressmen are kowtowing to politically organized Jews, i.e. AIPAC, CFIJA, CFI, LFI, CRIF etc’. Even J-Street is primarily dedicated to a jewish supremacist Israel.

    “The wealthy Jews control the world, in their hands lies the fate of governments and nations. They set governments one against the other. When the wealthy Jews play, the nations and the rulers dance. One way or the other, they get rich.” (Theodor Herzl, Deutsche Zeitung)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Junior

    Well, the majority of our Congressmen are kowtowing to politically organized Jews
     
    "Politically organized" is the KEY in your statement. And what are they politically organized to promote? They are NOT promoting the Jewish religion. They are promoting support for Israel. They are Zionists.

    Blame Jewish-Zionists, Christian-Zionists, Hindu-Zionists, Muslim-Zionists, Atheistic-Zionists, Buddhist-Zionists, and Followers of the Prophet/Profit- Zionists. Blame ANYONE who puts the interests of Israel over the interests of America. Blame the political ideology of supporting Israel that they are politically organized to promote, Zionism.

    The following is from the TrueTorahJews website:

    "While Herzl claimed that the establishment of a "Jewish" state would cure anti-Semitism, he also promoted anti-Semitism to further his cause.

    Herzl stated in his diary:

    "It would be an excellent idea to call in respectable, accredited anti-Semites as liquidators of property. To the people they would vouch for the fact that we do not wish to bring about the impoverishment of the countries that we leave. At first they must not be given large fees for this; otherwise we shall spoil our instruments and make them despicable as 'stooges of the Jews.' Later their fees will increase, and in the end we shall have only Gentile officials in the countries from which we have emigrated. The anti-Semites will become our most dependable friends, the anti-Semitic countries our allies." (The Complete Diaries of Theodor Herzl. Vol. 1, edited by Raphael Patai, translated by Harry Zohn, page 83-84)

    The Israeli Historian Benny Morris described how Herzl foresaw how anti-Semitism could be harnessed for the realization of Zionism. He stated:

    "Herzl regarded Zionism's triumph as inevitable, not only because life in Europe was ever more untenable for Jews, but also because it was in Europe's interests to rid the Jews and relieved of anti-Semitism: The European political establishment would eventually be persuaded to promote Zionism. Herzl recognized that anti-Semitism would be harnessed to his own--Zionist-purposes." (Righteous Victims, p. 21) "

    A.K.A., you are being used as a tool by the Zionists to further their cause by promoting anti-Semitism.

    http://www.truetorahjews.org/herzl

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4_1dfp3tAM

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. Clyde says:
    @bunga
    Saddam was just a ‘neighborhood bully,’ Netanyahu says– 13 years after saying Saddam threatened ‘security of our entire world’ - See more at: http://mondoweiss.net/2015/11/neighborhood-netanyahu-threatened#sthash.NnhQ8s83.dpuf

    The deception by Hipru ( Hebrew ) against Cannanite and later against Persian still ring so recent , poignant ,and fresh . Nothing has changed even the selecting "other" to carry out the task..

    There are 1.5 billion Muslims and they are invading Europe right now. There are 15 million Jews with about 6 million in Israel. What is the real threat to the world? Crazy nuked up Muslims in Iran and other nations or 6 million Zionist Jews in Israel?
    40 million Muslims have invaded Europe and most are are bleeding dry the European welfare systems. Due to centuries old Islamic colonialism and imperialism they just will not leave Israel alone. Then you have the world’s leftist social justice warriors hating Israel too and aligning themselves with the great Muslim Jihad. Commies and Muslims in bed together, making common cause.
    Europe = a slow Jihad situation
    Israel = a fast Jihad situation

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    Due to centuries old Islamic colonialism and imperialism they just will not leave Israel alone.
     
    Mr. Clyde, as you well know, you have things backwards. It's the Zionists who wont leave the Muslims alone. Just ask the Palestinians who have been suffering under a brutal occupation for the last 50 years... due to Zionist colonialism and imperialism.
    , @annamaria
    "...40 million Muslims have invaded Europe..."
    have you noticed that these Muslim invaders were first invaded by the military superior force of some powerful state? Check the names "Falluja" and "depleted uranium." Check the state of Libyan economy before the US-led "liberation" of thousands of Libyans of their homes and lives. And then check PNAC and Yinon Plan. “[The Yinon plan] is an Israeli strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority. It insists and stipulates that Israel must reconfigure its geo-political environment through the balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states." http://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815

    Q: Why had Jewish people been leaving Europe en masse in the end for 1930-s, flooding both South and North Americas, abandoning their homes and the ways of living? A: Because there was a powerful state with supremacist plans that targeted non-arians, while looking for more land and mineral resource.
    Q: Why have people from Libya, Syria, and Iraq been leaving their ancestral homes? - Because their lives became gravely endangered by the plans of two "exceptional" states.
    , @Avery
    {...Crazy nuked up Muslims in Iran and other nations...}

    I agree with some of the things you write.
    But you guys need to stop this ridiculous and false demonizing of Iran and Iranian people.
    Iran is neither "nuked up" nor crazy.
    Iran/Persia is an ancient, peaceful civilization.
    It hasn't attacked anyone in centuries.
    It was attacked by Iraq - egged on by US, UK, Saudi Arabia, Israel: Iranians lost several hundred thousand men, mostly young men, to stop the Iraqi invasion.

    Iranian leaders are very rational.
    On the other hand, Israel's current leaders are nuts.
    And Israel is the country that openly threatens to take down Europe if it itself goes down, even though Europe would have had absolutely nothing to do with the hypothetical future demise of Israel.

    You don't think that's Crazy with a capital C ?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. Clyde says:
    @Eileen Kuch
    There's nothing bad about Russian President Vladimir Putin, Clyde; he brought Russia out of dire poverty under the drunkard Boris Yeltsin by clearing out the mostly Jewish oligarchs that had been bleeding the country dry by pillaging the Treasury and restoring Russia to its Orthodox Christian roots.
    In addition, Putin has overhauled Russia's military to the point where no adversary .. even the USSA .. is able to defeat. To top it off, he didn't need a huge budget with which to accomplish this feat. Russia's weapons systems .. both defensive and offensive .. are superior, bar none; its fighter and bomber jets are superior .. as are its tanks and submarines.
    Also, in any meetings/dealings with Bibi, Putin didn't hesitate to put Israel's dictator in his place; whereas, in his most recent meeting with Bibi, Obama just about gave away the USSA store to him. And, guess what .. Teleprompter Barry never even once asked for our permission. That's how much he hates America.

    I have a thousand times more respect for Vlad Putin than for Obama. Putin is a nationalist who loves his people.
    Obama by the way is featured this month in Out Magazine. A gay publication. Obama’s photo is on the cover and he has an interview inside.
    Putin is laughing at this anti-Israel idiot.

    http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/11/11/455630392/obama-featured-on-the-cover-of-lgbt-magazine-out

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    Putin is laughing at this anti-Israel idiot.
     
    If you despise Obama because he is "anti-Israel," one can only imagine what you thought of Ron Paul as president.
    , @KA
    Putin is always described by media as poker faced. When was he seen laughing?
    By the way Israel was again given a lot of free money,free goodies and some raw intelligence by Obama. ( I am sure some of these money return to US to provide the Congressional junket to Israel and some go as donation to politicians who then make rules more friendly to Israel and some are offered the bestows igion from where they could shape foreign relation,justice department,treasury department and defense. Not that long ago,may be 3 yrs ago, US agreed to sell 40 billion worth of military supplies to Saudi and Gulf . To balance and to preserve the" Israeli upper hand". Obama agreed to provide 30 billion dollar worth of military supplies . But it was free. Israel would get it delivered even free ) And Obamais Antisemitic? Because? Because he did not destroy Iran. That's why.

    A nice article on relationship ( Israel US) --http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/acknowledging-reality-the-us-israeli-relationship-14289
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. Sam Shama says:
    @Ivan
    India with 1.2 billions is a world by itself. There are countless races and religions holding the balance in a matrix of forces and co-operation. This is the way most Indians, like myself like it. It ensures for one thing that we don't get the kind of "development" that China had with its mass starvations. We have our freedoms, with no thanks to the RSS-BJP combine. The majority of Indians have a live and let live attitude, but the Hindu fascists want to target the minority Muslims and Christians in order to pursue their agenda of a neverland of Hindu purity based on partly on cow-worship. The majority of Indians, Hindu or otherwise don't buy it as can be seen from the elections in Bihar.

    Hello Ivan,
    I was in India recently on a business trip (Mumbai and Delhi). I found the country to be a fascinating mix of ultra-rich and poor, modernists and antiquarians, hyper-nationalists and globalists. The people were universally warm. (I also visited the synagogues in Mumbai and they were absolute jewels).

    Narendra Modi, appears to be a man of vision.

    I was impressed and convinced that the Indian economy presents an unique situation: a combination of IT-human-capital based growth and a huge and under-invested opportunity in infrastructure and medium to heavy industry.

    I hear that Bibi Netanyahu is about to visit New Delhi soon. Modi ought to be careful.

    I’d be interested in your views.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. geokat62 says:
    @Clyde
    There are 1.5 billion Muslims and they are invading Europe right now. There are 15 million Jews with about 6 million in Israel. What is the real threat to the world? Crazy nuked up Muslims in Iran and other nations or 6 million Zionist Jews in Israel?
    40 million Muslims have invaded Europe and most are are bleeding dry the European welfare systems. Due to centuries old Islamic colonialism and imperialism they just will not leave Israel alone. Then you have the world's leftist social justice warriors hating Israel too and aligning themselves with the great Muslim Jihad. Commies and Muslims in bed together, making common cause.
    Europe = a slow Jihad situation
    Israel = a fast Jihad situation

    Due to centuries old Islamic colonialism and imperialism they just will not leave Israel alone.

    Mr. Clyde, as you well know, you have things backwards. It’s the Zionists who wont leave the Muslims alone. Just ask the Palestinians who have been suffering under a brutal occupation for the last 50 years… due to Zionist colonialism and imperialism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    How true is this?
    "CONSPIRACY ISIS Leader ‘Al-Baghdadi’ Is A ‘Jewish Mossad Agent’ – French Reports:" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FNQ4NeTmOc
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. geokat62 says:
    @Clyde
    I have a thousand times more respect for Vlad Putin than for Obama. Putin is a nationalist who loves his people.
    Obama by the way is featured this month in Out Magazine. A gay publication. Obama's photo is on the cover and he has an interview inside.
    Putin is laughing at this anti-Israel idiot.
    http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/11/11/455630392/obama-featured-on-the-cover-of-lgbt-magazine-out

    Putin is laughing at this anti-Israel idiot.

    If you despise Obama because he is “anti-Israel,” one can only imagine what you thought of Ron Paul as president.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde
    Ron Paul for president was 100% false flag operation. How he fooled so many is despicable!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. annamaria says:
    @Clyde
    There are 1.5 billion Muslims and they are invading Europe right now. There are 15 million Jews with about 6 million in Israel. What is the real threat to the world? Crazy nuked up Muslims in Iran and other nations or 6 million Zionist Jews in Israel?
    40 million Muslims have invaded Europe and most are are bleeding dry the European welfare systems. Due to centuries old Islamic colonialism and imperialism they just will not leave Israel alone. Then you have the world's leftist social justice warriors hating Israel too and aligning themselves with the great Muslim Jihad. Commies and Muslims in bed together, making common cause.
    Europe = a slow Jihad situation
    Israel = a fast Jihad situation

    “…40 million Muslims have invaded Europe…”
    have you noticed that these Muslim invaders were first invaded by the military superior force of some powerful state? Check the names “Falluja” and “depleted uranium.” Check the state of Libyan economy before the US-led “liberation” of thousands of Libyans of their homes and lives. And then check PNAC and Yinon Plan. “[The Yinon plan] is an Israeli strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority. It insists and stipulates that Israel must reconfigure its geo-political environment through the balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states.” http://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815

    Q: Why had Jewish people been leaving Europe en masse in the end for 1930-s, flooding both South and North Americas, abandoning their homes and the ways of living? A: Because there was a powerful state with supremacist plans that targeted non-arians, while looking for more land and mineral resource.
    Q: Why have people from Libya, Syria, and Iraq been leaving their ancestral homes? – Because their lives became gravely endangered by the plans of two “exceptional” states.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus

    Q: Why had Jewish people been leaving Europe en masse in the end for 1930-s, flooding both South and North Americas, abandoning their homes and the ways of living?

    A: Because there was a powerful state with supremacist plans that targeted non-arians, while looking for more land and mineral resource.
     
    I disagree.

    The posted Answer is the propagandized version that we've all been programmed to recite for all our lives.

    First, consider the status of Jews in Germany vis a vis Germans in Germany: which was the "invading" force and which was the indigenous body? Germany was German; Jews did and could still live in Germany as long as they became German in all ways. That was not happening in the 1930s: Jews from Russia and Poland flooded into Germany much as Germany is being overrun today. The difference is Hitler, alleged to have undescended testicles, nevertheless had balls and Merkel does not. NSDAP adopted legal remedies to remove those Jews who were not assimilatable from Germany.

    Assimilation was not good enough for zionist Jews: key to the zionist Jewish mindset is the notion that Jews must be in charge.

    The reality is Jews left Germany, under the directive of Louis Brandeis, after Brandeis & other zionist and Jewish leaders recognized that the vision they conceived in the aftermath of WWI and the German Revolution in 1918, of Jews successfully taking control of Germany, failed: Jews were a dominant force in Weimar and Weimar was a failure, politically, intellectually, financially and culturally.

    Two other greener fields presented themselves: the USA offered untapped opportunities for political and economic control and exploitation, and as home to an increasingly immigrant population, sufficiently pre-dumped-down so as to make the work of an exploiting elite a piece of cake. Jews flocked to the USA and took over plum positions in government, banking and universities. This was accomplished thru favored treatment granted on the plea of "victimization" (!) and "persecution" (!!). The pleas -- false tho they were -- worked marvelously well: Jews were admitted to USA in numbers far exceeding real victims in other European and other states: if persecution were the standard, why not admit thousands of Chinese, or Ukrainians who were being starved to death by Bolsheviks?

    Furthermore, Jewish persons who wriggled themselves into positions of influence, such as Henry Morgenthau, Jr as Secretary of Treasury, used US taxpayer money to finance Jewish migration to US, and also to finance Stalin's continued slaughter of Russian people and the planned destruction of Germany.

    Jews left Germany for greener pastures after they had despoiled Germany -- which NSDAP repaired, btw, necessitating an even more vicious and total program of devastation, sowing Carthage in salt.

    In their myth-history, on their way out Jews destroy the states where they had earlier dwelt prosperously, Egypt is the model. It is not an accident that Leon Uris's Exodus is the 'theme song' of the Jewish emigration from Germany, whose destruction they arranged for, and migration to USA and Palestine -- whose destruction they are implementing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. Marais says:
    @Orville H. Larson
    Piss on "Five Deferments Dick" Cheney, that armchair commando of renown.

    Liz (half of his latest ventriloquist act) also merits irrigation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. annamaria says:
    @geokat62

    Due to centuries old Islamic colonialism and imperialism they just will not leave Israel alone.
     
    Mr. Clyde, as you well know, you have things backwards. It's the Zionists who wont leave the Muslims alone. Just ask the Palestinians who have been suffering under a brutal occupation for the last 50 years... due to Zionist colonialism and imperialism.

    How true is this?
    “CONSPIRACY ISIS Leader ‘Al-Baghdadi’ Is A ‘Jewish Mossad Agent’ – French Reports:”

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62
    As I mentioned in a previous comment, I'd love to get a glimpse of the Mossad's to-do list.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. Marais says:
    @Rurik

    Wolsey too!
     
    I know

    I consider him to be one of the very top worst human beings on the planet, and perhaps the worst traitor to "his" country alive today. A real piece of work that guy. And there they all are.

    Woolsey certainly is a piece of work – a soul as dark as Michael Ledeen, but smarter, more dangerous, and a lot greedier.

    “Only fear will reestablish [Arab] respect for us…We need a little bit of Machiavelli.”
    -James Woolsey Glasgow Sunday Herald 13 April 2003

    ‘Iraqi Freedom’ in Woolsey’s view was all about instilling fear in Arabs, ‘shock and awe’ sanctified by Bernard Lewis and others:

    “America needed to hit someone in the Arab-Muslim world. Smashing Saudi Arabia or Syria would have been fine. But we hit Saddam for one simple reason: because we could, and because he deserved it.”
    -Thomas Friedman New York Times 4 June 2003

    And who else shares their view?

    “The rules of engagement have become so rigid that governments often straightjacket themselves in the face of unambiguous aggression…The application of military force, or the prospect of such application, inhibits terrorist violence.”
    -Benjamin Netanyahu ‘Terrorism: How the West Can Win’ 1987

    It’s a pity they didn’t watch Pontecorvo’s ‘Battle of Algiers’ (or learned nothing from it).

    Woolsey’s interest in Iraq seems pretty basic: financial self-enrichment:

    “The Iraq war is part of World War IV. This is going to be a long war, very long indeed. I hope not as long as the Cold War, 40 plus years, but certainly longer than either World War I or World War II. I rather imagine it’s going to be measured, I’m afraid, in decades…”
    -James Woolsey April 2003

    Woolsey hoped for “a long war…measured in decades.” The ventures he advised, the boards on which he sat would need time to maximize revenue. Paladin’s Homeland Security Fund, for example, would need a stable, long term conflict to attract investors and manifest profits.

    I wonder if he’s involved in TPP.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    I wonder if he’s involved in TPP.
     
    it would certainly be in his character

    There are very many whores of Zion on the world's stage as we all know. The repulsive Hagees and assorted religious prostitutes of Moloch. The intellectual whores to sniveling ambition like Newt Gingrich or George Will, the imbeciles like George W, the legions of treasonous opportunists of every stripe in our fecal government in DC.

    There are war pigs like the loathsome Lindsey Graham or the ever feculent McCain

    But for me, for some reason the worst of the worst of the worst is the man who I've come to consider the ultimate modern day kapo. Like those Jews in the camps who would collaborate with the Nazis and viciously beat or inform on their fellow Jews for that pat on the head. And especially for that extra privilege and better food! Perhaps even a swig or even a bottle! of schnapps for having put particularly nasty welts on some insolent Jew as an example to the others.

    That's how I see Woolsey. He comes across as a seriously vicious prick. I'm reminded of the hired Apache scouts who were invaluable to the US Army in finding the hiding places of the renegade Apaches.

    If I thought he had a drop of Jewish blood, then I wouldn't feel he was nearly so bad. Just another John Bolton type. But these Shabbos goys who serve the very worst of the Zionists with a rabid zeal, inspire a sickening feeling in me. Especially as they self-righteously put on airs like they're American patriots

    **hurl**
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. KA [AKA "Carthage"] says:
    @Ivan
    India with 1.2 billions is a world by itself. There are countless races and religions holding the balance in a matrix of forces and co-operation. This is the way most Indians, like myself like it. It ensures for one thing that we don't get the kind of "development" that China had with its mass starvations. We have our freedoms, with no thanks to the RSS-BJP combine. The majority of Indians have a live and let live attitude, but the Hindu fascists want to target the minority Muslims and Christians in order to pursue their agenda of a neverland of Hindu purity based on partly on cow-worship. The majority of Indians, Hindu or otherwise don't buy it as can be seen from the elections in Bihar.

    I don’t think the issue of tolerance is the problem for the millions holed up in the abyss of the poverty . Exclude Muslim and Christian and just focus on the poor among the broad spectrum of Hindu. Why is this silence why is this lack of movement,why is this blind acceptance of the condition?
    Its not that Indian poor have revolted. They have against British along with the rest and they have as recent as 2002 and 2013 against local Muslim in Gujrat and North Indian state near Delhi. But often these movements have been helmed by the upper caste .
    Most of the right against Muslim or Christian are carried out by poor equally marginilaizrd low caste Hindus . The agitation against mosque and churches and Muslim shrines from1987 have been carried out by the poor lower caste Hindus . All these agitations and violences happened at the instigation of upper caste ( through media, Videos,Policy decisions,focussed destruction of cottage business owned by Muslim , using security forces and public festivals ,theater ,nd TV serials ) One of the classis distraction was the riot that broke out in1990 after a high caste student immolated himself in fire to protest against newly created extra reservation for lower caste ( for votes) . To divert the attention BJP started nationwide movement against Muslim and the very same lower caste made it possible .
    But these lower caste as a group have never staked a claim that challenges the subliminal pervasive,diffuse psychological religious social control of Indian rich caste . They can only go after other lower caste after Muslim after Christian. This is in sharp contrast from the revolt people see in Africa. N Africa, Middle East . This has put them at a disadvantage because this weakness is internalized and is part of their defined existence .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art

    The agitation against mosque and churches and Muslim shrines from 1987 have been carried out by the poor lower caste Hindus . All these agitations and violences happened at the instigation of upper caste
     
    Sounds exactly like the Jim Crow south. The rich white elite kept the poor whites and blacks at each others throats and invested their monetary gains in the north. Thus keeping the local poor - poor --- and they the elite in power, skimming the profits, generation after generation.

    The rich of a tribal group agitate and sucker the poor of their group to hate and attack an outside grouping or faction. With the result, that the rich remain rich and the poor remain poor – such a deal.

    That is the mechanism of internal tribalism The poor folks get sucked into this infernal system of group hate, that keeps the elite of a tribal in power.

    p.s. Democracy or not - that his how it works. In the past the local wealthy maintained this system by owning everything that is important within the local culture. Even worse, today everything is owned by Wall Street. For things to change, local folks must legally and jointly own all the local important things that makes their culture function - stores, factories, and governments.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. Avery says:
    @Clyde
    There are 1.5 billion Muslims and they are invading Europe right now. There are 15 million Jews with about 6 million in Israel. What is the real threat to the world? Crazy nuked up Muslims in Iran and other nations or 6 million Zionist Jews in Israel?
    40 million Muslims have invaded Europe and most are are bleeding dry the European welfare systems. Due to centuries old Islamic colonialism and imperialism they just will not leave Israel alone. Then you have the world's leftist social justice warriors hating Israel too and aligning themselves with the great Muslim Jihad. Commies and Muslims in bed together, making common cause.
    Europe = a slow Jihad situation
    Israel = a fast Jihad situation

    {…Crazy nuked up Muslims in Iran and other nations…}

    I agree with some of the things you write.
    But you guys need to stop this ridiculous and false demonizing of Iran and Iranian people.
    Iran is neither “nuked up” nor crazy.
    Iran/Persia is an ancient, peaceful civilization.
    It hasn’t attacked anyone in centuries.
    It was attacked by Iraq – egged on by US, UK, Saudi Arabia, Israel: Iranians lost several hundred thousand men, mostly young men, to stop the Iraqi invasion.

    Iranian leaders are very rational.
    On the other hand, Israel’s current leaders are nuts.
    And Israel is the country that openly threatens to take down Europe if it itself goes down, even though Europe would have had absolutely nothing to do with the hypothetical future demise of Israel.

    You don’t think that’s Crazy with a capital C ?

    Read More
    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. KA says:
    @Clyde
    I have a thousand times more respect for Vlad Putin than for Obama. Putin is a nationalist who loves his people.
    Obama by the way is featured this month in Out Magazine. A gay publication. Obama's photo is on the cover and he has an interview inside.
    Putin is laughing at this anti-Israel idiot.
    http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/11/11/455630392/obama-featured-on-the-cover-of-lgbt-magazine-out

    Putin is always described by media as poker faced. When was he seen laughing?
    By the way Israel was again given a lot of free money,free goodies and some raw intelligence by Obama. ( I am sure some of these money return to US to provide the Congressional junket to Israel and some go as donation to politicians who then make rules more friendly to Israel and some are offered the bestows igion from where they could shape foreign relation,justice department,treasury department and defense. Not that long ago,may be 3 yrs ago, US agreed to sell 40 billion worth of military supplies to Saudi and Gulf . To balance and to preserve the” Israeli upper hand”. Obama agreed to provide 30 billion dollar worth of military supplies . But it was free. Israel would get it delivered even free ) And Obamais Antisemitic? Because? Because he did not destroy Iran. That’s why.

    A nice article on relationship ( Israel US) –http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/acknowledging-reality-the-us-israeli-relationship-14289

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    Turks keep ragging on Israel, while their genocidal, criminal, IslamoFascist, ISIS terrorist supporting state is squatting on Christian lands that were ethnically cleansed of indigenous Christians by invading nomad Turks from Uyguristan.
    Ethnically cleansed after a Genocide of about 4 millions Christians (1915-1923).
    Israelis can't hold a candle to Genocidal Turks when it comes to killing and murder on a mass scale.
    Murder of defenseless civilians: old men and women; women; children; babies.

    At least some Israeli Jews can claim historic links to the lands of their ancestors living in Judea.
    What claim do you nomad Turks from Uyguristan have living in Asia Minor ?
    What are your nomad Turks doing occupying 40% of Cyprus ?
    Who are you invadonomad Turks to criticize Israel for anything ?

    Get out of Christian lands and go back to Uyguristan before you concern yourself with Israel.

    , @Clyde

    Not that long ago,may be 3 yrs ago, US agreed to sell 40 billion worth of military supplies to Saudi and Gulf . To balance and to preserve the” Israeli upper hand”.
     
    Then Israel should get $40 million too. The Zionists got ripped off by Obama! Israel gets about 3 billion a year, mostly in military aid that must be spent with US arms manufacturers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. KA [AKA "Carthage"] says:
    @annamaria
    Thank you

    Welcome

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. @annamaria
    "...40 million Muslims have invaded Europe..."
    have you noticed that these Muslim invaders were first invaded by the military superior force of some powerful state? Check the names "Falluja" and "depleted uranium." Check the state of Libyan economy before the US-led "liberation" of thousands of Libyans of their homes and lives. And then check PNAC and Yinon Plan. “[The Yinon plan] is an Israeli strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority. It insists and stipulates that Israel must reconfigure its geo-political environment through the balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states." http://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815

    Q: Why had Jewish people been leaving Europe en masse in the end for 1930-s, flooding both South and North Americas, abandoning their homes and the ways of living? A: Because there was a powerful state with supremacist plans that targeted non-arians, while looking for more land and mineral resource.
    Q: Why have people from Libya, Syria, and Iraq been leaving their ancestral homes? - Because their lives became gravely endangered by the plans of two "exceptional" states.

    Q: Why had Jewish people been leaving Europe en masse in the end for 1930-s, flooding both South and North Americas, abandoning their homes and the ways of living?

    A: Because there was a powerful state with supremacist plans that targeted non-arians, while looking for more land and mineral resource.

    I disagree.

    The posted Answer is the propagandized version that we’ve all been programmed to recite for all our lives.

    First, consider the status of Jews in Germany vis a vis Germans in Germany: which was the “invading” force and which was the indigenous body? Germany was German; Jews did and could still live in Germany as long as they became German in all ways. That was not happening in the 1930s: Jews from Russia and Poland flooded into Germany much as Germany is being overrun today. The difference is Hitler, alleged to have undescended testicles, nevertheless had balls and Merkel does not. NSDAP adopted legal remedies to remove those Jews who were not assimilatable from Germany.

    Assimilation was not good enough for zionist Jews: key to the zionist Jewish mindset is the notion that Jews must be in charge.

    The reality is Jews left Germany, under the directive of Louis Brandeis, after Brandeis & other zionist and Jewish leaders recognized that the vision they conceived in the aftermath of WWI and the German Revolution in 1918, of Jews successfully taking control of Germany, failed: Jews were a dominant force in Weimar and Weimar was a failure, politically, intellectually, financially and culturally.

    Two other greener fields presented themselves: the USA offered untapped opportunities for political and economic control and exploitation, and as home to an increasingly immigrant population, sufficiently pre-dumped-down so as to make the work of an exploiting elite a piece of cake. Jews flocked to the USA and took over plum positions in government, banking and universities. This was accomplished thru favored treatment granted on the plea of “victimization” (!) and “persecution” (!!). The pleas — false tho they were — worked marvelously well: Jews were admitted to USA in numbers far exceeding real victims in other European and other states: if persecution were the standard, why not admit thousands of Chinese, or Ukrainians who were being starved to death by Bolsheviks?

    Furthermore, Jewish persons who wriggled themselves into positions of influence, such as Henry Morgenthau, Jr as Secretary of Treasury, used US taxpayer money to finance Jewish migration to US, and also to finance Stalin’s continued slaughter of Russian people and the planned destruction of Germany.

    Jews left Germany for greener pastures after they had despoiled Germany — which NSDAP repaired, btw, necessitating an even more vicious and total program of devastation, sowing Carthage in salt.

    In their myth-history, on their way out Jews destroy the states where they had earlier dwelt prosperously, Egypt is the model. It is not an accident that Leon Uris’s Exodus is the ‘theme song’ of the Jewish emigration from Germany, whose destruction they arranged for, and migration to USA and Palestine — whose destruction they are implementing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sam Shama

    First, consider the status of Jews in Germany vis a vis Germans in Germany: which was the “invading” force and which was the indigenous body?
     
    You cannot mean that German Jews as a group were actively plotting against their country; or perhaps you do mean it, for it matters not at at all, Jews being eternal non-citizens definitionally, grouping Germans [who happened to be Jews] with the East European Bolsheviks [not all of whom were Jews] is par for the course. You often throw names like Weizman, Jabotinsky, Phillipe Rothschild etc. when you proffer these pro-NSDAP [better know as Nazis] tropes. Yet it is a rather straightforward matter, turning these particularist arguments on their heads, by simply noting that none of these 'Big Jews' owed any particular allegiance to Germany. To Britain, the Czar and France: certainly, and they shouldered those responsibilities admirably. That the Balfour Declaration was payment for a job well done - well what of it?

    Assimilation was not good enough for zionist Jews: key to the zionist Jewish mindset is the notion that Jews must be in charge
     
    Assimilation is an idea resisted by all human groups: it is called social choice; but that in no way precludes fealty to the country in which such groups claim and receive citizenship. If the Zionist mindset yearns to be in charge, so does the Italian, the British, the American, the Chinese, the Japanese, the Nigerian, the Iranian, and the Zambian. It might be coded in our DNA, broadly referred to as the human condition.

    The reality is Jews left Germany, under the directive of Louis Brandeis, after Brandeis & other zionist and Jewish leaders recognized that the vision they conceived in the aftermath of WWI and the German Revolution in 1918, of Jews successfully taking control of Germany, failed: Jews were a dominant force in Weimar and Weimar was a failure, politically, intellectually, financially and culturally.
     
    I would not call it a directive; more like sound advice on account of the slaughter that follwed. So if the Jews had failed in their sinister plot to take over Germany in 1918, how does that reconcile with you subsequent claim that Jews were undermining Germany from their internal control?

    The two paragraphs that follow the block I highlighted immediately above, are pathetic. Jewish immigration to the U.S. whether the result of opportunities or asylum, aided or not by prominent American Jews who were citizens of the U.S., presents no crime as such, does it? There is no requirement that individuals or citizen advocacy groups engage the channels of immigration, observing some strict requirement of uniformity administered to all nationalities. It has never been so in the U.S. That Jewish American citizens advocated for Jewish immigration, is no different from any other group or groups [WASPs e.g.] that have historically advocated immigration for their own kith and kin and, not to put too fine a point on it, had actually resisted immigration from southern and eastern Europe and prevented it from Asia.


    In their myth-history, on their way out Jews destroy the states where they had earlier dwelt prosperously, Egypt is the model.
     
    Right you are. Would you care for a bit of that 'Prosperity'? I hear the Saudis, wearing the modern mantle of Pharaonic traditions are happy to oblige.

    I oppose the WB Zionists and their facilitators in this country, but the more I read such accounting of Jews as viruses, the less constant I feel in my resolve, that people can get past - once again - the Human Condition.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. annamaria says:

    Interesting:
    “Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana’s Apologists”

    http://thesaker.is/time-is-running-out-for-pax-americanas-apologists/

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    "Did Russia just “gently” threaten the USA?"
    http://thesaker.is/did-russia-just-gently-threaten-the-usa/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. annamaria says:
    @annamaria
    Interesting:
    "Time Is Running Out For Pax Americana’s Apologists"
    http://thesaker.is/time-is-running-out-for-pax-americanas-apologists/

    “Did Russia just “gently” threaten the USA?”

    http://thesaker.is/did-russia-just-gently-threaten-the-usa/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. Rurik says:
    @Marais
    Woolsey certainly is a piece of work - a soul as dark as Michael Ledeen, but smarter, more dangerous, and a lot greedier.

    “Only fear will reestablish [Arab] respect for us...We need a little bit of Machiavelli.”
    -James Woolsey Glasgow Sunday Herald 13 April 2003
     
    ‘Iraqi Freedom’ in Woolsey’s view was all about instilling fear in Arabs, ‘shock and awe’ sanctified by Bernard Lewis and others:

    “America needed to hit someone in the Arab-Muslim world. Smashing Saudi Arabia or Syria would have been fine. But we hit Saddam for one simple reason: because we could, and because he deserved it.”
    -Thomas Friedman New York Times 4 June 2003
     
    And who else shares their view?

    "The rules of engagement have become so rigid that governments often straightjacket themselves in the face of unambiguous aggression...The application of military force, or the prospect of such application, inhibits terrorist violence."
    -Benjamin Netanyahu 'Terrorism: How the West Can Win' 1987
     
    It’s a pity they didn’t watch Pontecorvo’s ‘Battle of Algiers’ (or learned nothing from it).

    Woolsey’s interest in Iraq seems pretty basic: financial self-enrichment:

    “The Iraq war is part of World War IV. This is going to be a long war, very long indeed. I hope not as long as the Cold War, 40 plus years, but certainly longer than either World War I or World War II. I rather imagine it's going to be measured, I'm afraid, in decades...”
    -James Woolsey April 2003
     
    Woolsey hoped for “a long war...measured in decades.” The ventures he advised, the boards on which he sat would need time to maximize revenue. Paladin’s Homeland Security Fund, for example, would need a stable, long term conflict to attract investors and manifest profits.

    I wonder if he’s involved in TPP.

    I wonder if he’s involved in TPP.

    it would certainly be in his character

    There are very many whores of Zion on the world’s stage as we all know. The repulsive Hagees and assorted religious prostitutes of Moloch. The intellectual whores to sniveling ambition like Newt Gingrich or George Will, the imbeciles like George W, the legions of treasonous opportunists of every stripe in our fecal government in DC.

    There are war pigs like the loathsome Lindsey Graham or the ever feculent McCain

    But for me, for some reason the worst of the worst of the worst is the man who I’ve come to consider the ultimate modern day kapo. Like those Jews in the camps who would collaborate with the Nazis and viciously beat or inform on their fellow Jews for that pat on the head. And especially for that extra privilege and better food! Perhaps even a swig or even a bottle! of schnapps for having put particularly nasty welts on some insolent Jew as an example to the others.

    That’s how I see Woolsey. He comes across as a seriously vicious prick. I’m reminded of the hired Apache scouts who were invaluable to the US Army in finding the hiding places of the renegade Apaches.

    If I thought he had a drop of Jewish blood, then I wouldn’t feel he was nearly so bad. Just another John Bolton type. But these Shabbos goys who serve the very worst of the Zionists with a rabid zeal, inspire a sickening feeling in me. Especially as they self-righteously put on airs like they’re American patriots

    **hurl**

    Read More
    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. schmenz says:
    @Rurik
    Hello Fran,

    As for my comment about history being more fair were Germans subjected to the treatment that Palestinians receive instead by proxy, even the Likud Israeli Prime Minister’s recent comments reveal as much
     
    OK, so you weren't being facetious. You do feel it would be fair for the German people today to suffer what the Palestinians suffer. You do feel that people are guilty of the crimes of their ancestors. And that they should be made to pay. Even if they had no part in it.

    Since even the German leadership corrected him with the information that it was indeed Germans who thought it up,
     
    In case you haven't noticed the German government today is one of the most completely and absolutely occupied by the Zionists and Jewish power structure. A German politician doesn't fart unless he's sure it's OK with the Jews, even more so than England or the US or Israel, for that matter. I think the only government more slavishly under the boot of the Zionists, is.. well, there isn't one. So when the German government (or media) tells the world that the German people are guilty for all time for the Holocaust, (much of which is lies) we are not hearing precisely from people who are representing the interests of the German people without prejudice.

    Without the German program of genocide against Jews, accompanied by the wholly inadequate response to it by the rest of the gentile world,
     
    let me help you out here, what you mean to say is the Nazi program of genocide. OK? There is a difference, even if you have been inundated with decades of anti-German propaganda. If you want to blame the German people for all perpetuity because of the crimes of a government they had 70+ years ago, then you have to blame all people everywhere for the crimes of some obscure people who lived long ago and did terrible things to others during war. That pretty much encompasses us all.

    The Palestinians displaced through a lesser form of ethnic cleansing to give Jewish settlers living space are those who are suffering the consequences for the war crimes that Germany as a nation committed from the 1930s, once ruled by the Nazis with popular support.
     
    now the displacement (and slaughter) of the Palestinians from their own ancient lands is a "lesser" form of ethnic cleansing. And if you didn't know, it was the Jews who wanted and coveted that land. The Germans didn't force them to go there. It was Jewish terrorists who slaughtered their way across Palestine and drove those people out of their homes and villages. But now somehow all of that genocidal terror and butchery is now the direct fault of a German child born today.

    One notion of justice is that the evil that one plans for others, comes back on one instead.
     
    But Fran, all the Nazis are dead. Punishing a race (out of pure hate) for the crimes of what a few of them did is exactly what the Nazi did. Do you understand that? It's what the Zionists do to Gaza when they bomb them indiscriminately for a so called rocket attack. To say the Germans should be genocided and displaced and tormented by Jewish sadists is the same evil mentality that the Nazis and Zionists were and are engaged in, respectively.

    No one deserved to be punished for the crimes of others. A child born in America today does not deserve to suffer for the myriad and unprecedented crimes that the US government is committing today. Russians today should not be punished for the crimes of Stalin. Vietnamese children should not be punished for the crimes of Pol Pot, Chinese should not be punished for the crimes of Mao. But some of us can't get past our hate. We want to heap blame and guilt upon others, not for anything that they've done, but for what they look like. It's sad and pathetic.

    Well stated, Rurik.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. Avery says:
    @KA
    Putin is always described by media as poker faced. When was he seen laughing?
    By the way Israel was again given a lot of free money,free goodies and some raw intelligence by Obama. ( I am sure some of these money return to US to provide the Congressional junket to Israel and some go as donation to politicians who then make rules more friendly to Israel and some are offered the bestows igion from where they could shape foreign relation,justice department,treasury department and defense. Not that long ago,may be 3 yrs ago, US agreed to sell 40 billion worth of military supplies to Saudi and Gulf . To balance and to preserve the" Israeli upper hand". Obama agreed to provide 30 billion dollar worth of military supplies . But it was free. Israel would get it delivered even free ) And Obamais Antisemitic? Because? Because he did not destroy Iran. That's why.

    A nice article on relationship ( Israel US) --http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/acknowledging-reality-the-us-israeli-relationship-14289

    Turks keep ragging on Israel, while their genocidal, criminal, IslamoFascist, ISIS terrorist supporting state is squatting on Christian lands that were ethnically cleansed of indigenous Christians by invading nomad Turks from Uyguristan.
    Ethnically cleansed after a Genocide of about 4 millions Christians (1915-1923).
    Israelis can’t hold a candle to Genocidal Turks when it comes to killing and murder on a mass scale.
    Murder of defenseless civilians: old men and women; women; children; babies.

    At least some Israeli Jews can claim historic links to the lands of their ancestors living in Judea.
    What claim do you nomad Turks from Uyguristan have living in Asia Minor ?
    What are your nomad Turks doing occupying 40% of Cyprus ?
    Who are you invadonomad Turks to criticize Israel for anything ?

    Get out of Christian lands and go back to Uyguristan before you concern yourself with Israel.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. Art says:
    @KA
    I don't think the issue of tolerance is the problem for the millions holed up in the abyss of the poverty . Exclude Muslim and Christian and just focus on the poor among the broad spectrum of Hindu. Why is this silence why is this lack of movement,why is this blind acceptance of the condition?
    Its not that Indian poor have revolted. They have against British along with the rest and they have as recent as 2002 and 2013 against local Muslim in Gujrat and North Indian state near Delhi. But often these movements have been helmed by the upper caste .
    Most of the right against Muslim or Christian are carried out by poor equally marginilaizrd low caste Hindus . The agitation against mosque and churches and Muslim shrines from1987 have been carried out by the poor lower caste Hindus . All these agitations and violences happened at the instigation of upper caste ( through media, Videos,Policy decisions,focussed destruction of cottage business owned by Muslim , using security forces and public festivals ,theater ,nd TV serials ) One of the classis distraction was the riot that broke out in1990 after a high caste student immolated himself in fire to protest against newly created extra reservation for lower caste ( for votes) . To divert the attention BJP started nationwide movement against Muslim and the very same lower caste made it possible .
    But these lower caste as a group have never staked a claim that challenges the subliminal pervasive,diffuse psychological religious social control of Indian rich caste . They can only go after other lower caste after Muslim after Christian. This is in sharp contrast from the revolt people see in Africa. N Africa, Middle East . This has put them at a disadvantage because this weakness is internalized and is part of their defined existence .

    The agitation against mosque and churches and Muslim shrines from 1987 have been carried out by the poor lower caste Hindus . All these agitations and violences happened at the instigation of upper caste

    Sounds exactly like the Jim Crow south. The rich white elite kept the poor whites and blacks at each others throats and invested their monetary gains in the north. Thus keeping the local poor – poor — and they the elite in power, skimming the profits, generation after generation.

    The rich of a tribal group agitate and sucker the poor of their group to hate and attack an outside grouping or faction. With the result, that the rich remain rich and the poor remain poor – such a deal.

    That is the mechanism of internal tribalism The poor folks get sucked into this infernal system of group hate, that keeps the elite of a tribal in power.

    p.s. Democracy or not – that his how it works. In the past the local wealthy maintained this system by owning everything that is important within the local culture. Even worse, today everything is owned by Wall Street. For things to change, local folks must legally and jointly own all the local important things that makes their culture function – stores, factories, and governments.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. Clyde says:
    @geokat62

    Putin is laughing at this anti-Israel idiot.
     
    If you despise Obama because he is "anti-Israel," one can only imagine what you thought of Ron Paul as president.

    Ron Paul for president was 100% false flag operation. How he fooled so many is despicable!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. Clyde says:
    @KA
    Putin is always described by media as poker faced. When was he seen laughing?
    By the way Israel was again given a lot of free money,free goodies and some raw intelligence by Obama. ( I am sure some of these money return to US to provide the Congressional junket to Israel and some go as donation to politicians who then make rules more friendly to Israel and some are offered the bestows igion from where they could shape foreign relation,justice department,treasury department and defense. Not that long ago,may be 3 yrs ago, US agreed to sell 40 billion worth of military supplies to Saudi and Gulf . To balance and to preserve the" Israeli upper hand". Obama agreed to provide 30 billion dollar worth of military supplies . But it was free. Israel would get it delivered even free ) And Obamais Antisemitic? Because? Because he did not destroy Iran. That's why.

    A nice article on relationship ( Israel US) --http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/acknowledging-reality-the-us-israeli-relationship-14289

    Not that long ago,may be 3 yrs ago, US agreed to sell 40 billion worth of military supplies to Saudi and Gulf . To balance and to preserve the” Israeli upper hand”.

    Then Israel should get $40 million too. The Zionists got ripped off by Obama! Israel gets about 3 billion a year, mostly in military aid that must be spent with US arms manufacturers.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Old Jew
    Not the same!

    Saudi pay.

    Israel receives for free.

    , @KA
    Israeli supporters should do openly and in full view of the informed people , and hopefully Americans could hear from CNN ,NYT,FOX and doesn't have to come to this site or to this one, http://www.ifamericansknew.org/stat/usaid.html

    Well ,then whole American will be called antisemites or who knows , might be accused of enforcing Yellow Ribbon .

    -"JERUSALEM — In a stinging rebuke to Israel, the European Union insisted on Wednesday that some goods produced on land seized in the 1967 war must be labeled “made in settlements,” a mandate that added to Israel’s deep unease over a growing international boycott.
    From Our Advertisers

    European officials tried to play down the decision, saying the guidelines merely clarified existing rules. But the move exacerbated already simmering tensions between Israel and Europe as Israeli politicians condemned it as an echo of the Holocaust-era branding of European Jews and their storefronts with yellow stars."

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/12/world/middleeast/eu-labels-israeli-settlements.html?src=me&_r=0

    , @KA
    "In 2007, the Bush Administration and the Israeli government agreed to a 10-year, $30 billion military aid package for the period from FY2009 to FY2018. During his March 2013 visit to Israel, President Obama pledged that the United States would continue to provide Israel with multi-year commitments of military aid subject to the approval of Congress. This week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will be seeking a 10-year, $50 billion military aid package to succeed the current arrangement. The United States is pledged to insure that Israel commands a "qualitative military edge" over its neighbors."

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/9/bruce-fein-end-mideast-arms-sales-nonhumanitarian-/print/



    From same article -"Since October 2010, President Obama has notified Congress of proposed sales to Saudi Arabia of fighter aircraft, helicopters, missile defense systems, missiles, bombs, armed vehicles, and related equipment and services exceeding $90 billion.

    In 2014, the United States approved weapons sales to Iraq approaching $15 billion."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. Art says:
    @RobinG
    And I think you're succumbing to wishful thinking. “I’ll call Bibi on the first day of my presidency and give away the store,” is EXACTLY what Hillary is saying, and she's looking increasingly likely. The Dems won't challenge her, and the Reps don't go beyond her emails. They won't call her a bloodthirsty neocon hawk, because so are they.

    Who really disappoints me is O'Malley. His pal Chafee was making good points about foreign policy - which nobody noticed because he shot himself in the foot by bringing up the metric system so that was all the MSM covered. I had hoped when Chafee dropped out that O'Malley would pick up the banner, but no such luck.

    Anyway, maybe all my hopes were ill-founded if the Pope is really pro-Israel. O'Malley's Catholicism and Jesuit education might have translated into moral diplomacy. His debate points have just been political generalities (for the benefit of the Dem Party). If he's not playing to win, at least he could call out the Israel Lobby. I guess he's afraid he'd have no public OR private career later if he did that.

    “If he’s (O’Malley) not playing to win, at least he could call out the Israel Lobby. I guess he’s afraid he’d have no public OR private career later if he did that.”

    Exactly – he has to work the Jew divide and conquer political scene – or he will be trashed.

    Look at what is happening to these liberal collage administrators – they are being thrown under the buss by the latest divide and conquer politics – the extreme over the top Black Panther like “black lives matter” nonsense.

    I do not know how anyone can vote for these destructive people.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. Art says:
    @geokat62

    If Rand Paul would find the gonads to routinely use the word “neocon” and make more anti-war statements – guaranteed he could make it to the Republican convention.
     
    Didn't his father, Ron Paul, have "the gonads to routinely use the word 'neocon' and make more anti-war statements," but he still didn't make it to the convention?

    People need to wake up to the fact that the political system has been hijacked by the 1% (otherwise known as the 4 big Bs: Big Banking, Big Pharma, Big MIC, and last but not least Big Zion) and they are not about to relinquish it voluntarily.

    Big changes are needed and they are not going to come from within the system itself.

    “Didn’t his father, Ron Paul, have “the gonads to routinely use the word ‘neocon’ and make more anti-war statements,” but he still didn’t make it to the convention?”

    We do not have to win this time. But we have to start someplace.

    If Rand Paul were to go to the Republican convention with 5 or 10 percent of the delegates spouting his anti-neocon, anti-war, anti-fed message that would be a major victory.

    Today we have ZERO. We need a acknowledged presence in the body politic. The truth is powerful – it will work its way.

    p..s. We could have a brokered Republican convention were no one have the required votes to win – those 5 or 10 percent could be king makers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. Sam Shama says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Q: Why had Jewish people been leaving Europe en masse in the end for 1930-s, flooding both South and North Americas, abandoning their homes and the ways of living?

    A: Because there was a powerful state with supremacist plans that targeted non-arians, while looking for more land and mineral resource.
     
    I disagree.

    The posted Answer is the propagandized version that we've all been programmed to recite for all our lives.

    First, consider the status of Jews in Germany vis a vis Germans in Germany: which was the "invading" force and which was the indigenous body? Germany was German; Jews did and could still live in Germany as long as they became German in all ways. That was not happening in the 1930s: Jews from Russia and Poland flooded into Germany much as Germany is being overrun today. The difference is Hitler, alleged to have undescended testicles, nevertheless had balls and Merkel does not. NSDAP adopted legal remedies to remove those Jews who were not assimilatable from Germany.

    Assimilation was not good enough for zionist Jews: key to the zionist Jewish mindset is the notion that Jews must be in charge.

    The reality is Jews left Germany, under the directive of Louis Brandeis, after Brandeis & other zionist and Jewish leaders recognized that the vision they conceived in the aftermath of WWI and the German Revolution in 1918, of Jews successfully taking control of Germany, failed: Jews were a dominant force in Weimar and Weimar was a failure, politically, intellectually, financially and culturally.

    Two other greener fields presented themselves: the USA offered untapped opportunities for political and economic control and exploitation, and as home to an increasingly immigrant population, sufficiently pre-dumped-down so as to make the work of an exploiting elite a piece of cake. Jews flocked to the USA and took over plum positions in government, banking and universities. This was accomplished thru favored treatment granted on the plea of "victimization" (!) and "persecution" (!!). The pleas -- false tho they were -- worked marvelously well: Jews were admitted to USA in numbers far exceeding real victims in other European and other states: if persecution were the standard, why not admit thousands of Chinese, or Ukrainians who were being starved to death by Bolsheviks?

    Furthermore, Jewish persons who wriggled themselves into positions of influence, such as Henry Morgenthau, Jr as Secretary of Treasury, used US taxpayer money to finance Jewish migration to US, and also to finance Stalin's continued slaughter of Russian people and the planned destruction of Germany.

    Jews left Germany for greener pastures after they had despoiled Germany -- which NSDAP repaired, btw, necessitating an even more vicious and total program of devastation, sowing Carthage in salt.

    In their myth-history, on their way out Jews destroy the states where they had earlier dwelt prosperously, Egypt is the model. It is not an accident that Leon Uris's Exodus is the 'theme song' of the Jewish emigration from Germany, whose destruction they arranged for, and migration to USA and Palestine -- whose destruction they are implementing.

    First, consider the status of Jews in Germany vis a vis Germans in Germany: which was the “invading” force and which was the indigenous body?

    You cannot mean that German Jews as a group were actively plotting against their country; or perhaps you do mean it, for it matters not at at all, Jews being eternal non-citizens definitionally, grouping Germans [who happened to be Jews] with the East European Bolsheviks [not all of whom were Jews] is par for the course. You often throw names like Weizman, Jabotinsky, Phillipe Rothschild etc. when you proffer these pro-NSDAP [better know as Nazis] tropes. Yet it is a rather straightforward matter, turning these particularist arguments on their heads, by simply noting that none of these ‘Big Jews’ owed any particular allegiance to Germany. To Britain, the Czar and France: certainly, and they shouldered those responsibilities admirably. That the Balfour Declaration was payment for a job well done – well what of it?

    Assimilation was not good enough for zionist Jews: key to the zionist Jewish mindset is the notion that Jews must be in charge

    Assimilation is an idea resisted by all human groups: it is called social choice; but that in no way precludes fealty to the country in which such groups claim and receive citizenship. If the Zionist mindset yearns to be in charge, so does the Italian, the British, the American, the Chinese, the Japanese, the Nigerian, the Iranian, and the Zambian. It might be coded in our DNA, broadly referred to as the human condition.

    The reality is Jews left Germany, under the directive of Louis Brandeis, after Brandeis & other zionist and Jewish leaders recognized that the vision they conceived in the aftermath of WWI and the German Revolution in 1918, of Jews successfully taking control of Germany, failed: Jews were a dominant force in Weimar and Weimar was a failure, politically, intellectually, financially and culturally.

    I would not call it a directive; more like sound advice on account of the slaughter that follwed. So if the Jews had failed in their sinister plot to take over Germany in 1918, how does that reconcile with you subsequent claim that Jews were undermining Germany from their internal control?

    The two paragraphs that follow the block I highlighted immediately above, are pathetic. Jewish immigration to the U.S. whether the result of opportunities or asylum, aided or not by prominent American Jews who were citizens of the U.S., presents no crime as such, does it? There is no requirement that individuals or citizen advocacy groups engage the channels of immigration, observing some strict requirement of uniformity administered to all nationalities. It has never been so in the U.S. That Jewish American citizens advocated for Jewish immigration, is no different from any other group or groups [WASPs e.g.] that have historically advocated immigration for their own kith and kin and, not to put too fine a point on it, had actually resisted immigration from southern and eastern Europe and prevented it from Asia.

    In their myth-history, on their way out Jews destroy the states where they had earlier dwelt prosperously, Egypt is the model.

    Right you are. Would you care for a bit of that ‘Prosperity’? I hear the Saudis, wearing the modern mantle of Pharaonic traditions are happy to oblige.

    I oppose the WB Zionists and their facilitators in this country, but the more I read such accounting of Jews as viruses, the less constant I feel in my resolve, that people can get past – once again – the Human Condition.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik
    Hello Sam and welcome back!

    Not to jump in here, it was just this one quip of yours that I wanted to respond to..

    That the Balfour Declaration was payment for a job well done – well what of it?
     
    This is a nice little treatise by one of your fellow Jews. A smart and connected man, he knew of what he spoke

    http://www.themodernreligion.com/jihad/freedman.html

    when I read this decades ago, it was a kind of red pill for me back then

    I had marinated in 'the narrative' for so long, it hit me like a ton of bricks
    , @Fran Macadam
    I'm not sure it's worth engaging some of these solopsistic commenters. Their delusions - if they are not rather interlopers out to discredit legitimate critique by proximity to over the top antisemitism - are impregnable. Either way, facts will never change their habits. The only reason to post is then to engage with the original author's writing, or in extremis to act as an antidote to the smear attempts to discredit him. Maybe some naive but otherwise fair soul who might get sucked in otherwise by some of the deceptive comments will see how easily they are debunked.
    , @RobinG
    Sam,

    "– the Human Condition."

    There's no escape. So what are we to do?
    , @Art

    I oppose the WB Zionists and their facilitators in this country, but the more I read such accounting of Jews as viruses, the less constant I feel in my resolve, that people can get past – once again – the Human Condition.
     
    Sam,

    We humans have inherent good traits and bad traits. One side of the Human Condition promotes tribalness, pyramid top down coercion, and zero-sum thinking. On the other side of the Human Condition we find a hopefulness, kindness, and forgiveness that is exemplified in Christian philosophy.

    Why is it so often that the Jews (Big and Little) are found on the negative coercive side of the Human Condition, taking advantage of the worst side of our humanness?

    Art

    , @SolontoCroesus

    Yet it is a rather straightforward matter, turning these particularist arguments on their heads, by simply noting that none of these ‘Big Jews’ owed any particular allegiance to Germany. To Britain, the Czar and France: certainly, and they shouldered those responsibilities admirably. That the Balfour Declaration was payment for a job well done – well what of it?
     
    Weizmann = Chalabi. He was not exerting his efforts for the ultimate benefit of the British; rather, he instrumentalized Britain for the benefit of Jews/zionists/the Palestine project.

    In what way did Weizmann benefit the British?
    Did the British win WWI in any meaningful way?

    The British did not win the war, but Germany certainly lost.

    Jews, however, did win: Edwin Black wrote in "The Transfer Agreement" that zionist Jews returned from Versailles in triumph -- a dual triumph: they had acquired a homeland for Jews in Palestine, and affirmation of minority rights for Jews in European states where they dwelt.

    It's possible, just maybe, that the German people noticed that at the cost of their children dying of starvation, Jews "achieved a dual triumph."

    Rurik's use of the word "treacherous" is appropriate:
    1. According to his long-time assistant, Leonard Stein, Weizmann set up three categories of antisemitism in the British leaders for whom, in your view, Weizmann was providing so much value. He assessed the type of antisemitism evident in the leaders he would need to influence, then set about exploiting that antisemitic impetus to gain his goal -- the Balfour declaration.
    2. Once having isolated Lord Balfour as a suitable quarry, Baron Rothschild visited him daily, stroking his ego.
    3. Jews did not keep a key term of the Balfour declaration -- that the Arabs in the region not be negatively impacted by Jewish settlement. The British agreed to plant Jews in Palestine for their own strategic interests, but it was also essential to British interests to maintain good relations with Arabs. Jews in Palestine interfered with that British requirement. Before very long, Jews effectively expelled the British from Palestine, having been weakened by the war that Weizmann helped them win.

    As for Rathenau -- if I recall correctly he was in charge of industrial production and also of balancing domestic and war demands. Once again referring to Edwin Black's "The Transfer Agreement," where Black mentions in a decidedly cavalier manner the starvation-death of 800,000 German civilians, he blames it on inappropriate decisions to use resources to fight the war rather than to feed the population. Those decisions would have been made at Rathenau's desk.
    (The very fact that Black treats the starvation of 800,000 German civilians so off-handedly suggests that very few, if any, Jews suffered starvation. Indeed, Jewish welfare agencies operated throughout the region during and after the war, assisting Polish Jews to safer harbor in Germany, and distributing either food or sufficient financial resources so that German Jews could obtain stuffs on black market. Germans who watched their children die may not have failed to notice that Jewish children were not starving.)

    ---
    Louis Brandeis's directive that Jews should leave Germany will be discussed at a later time.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. Rurik says:
    @Sam Shama

    First, consider the status of Jews in Germany vis a vis Germans in Germany: which was the “invading” force and which was the indigenous body?
     
    You cannot mean that German Jews as a group were actively plotting against their country; or perhaps you do mean it, for it matters not at at all, Jews being eternal non-citizens definitionally, grouping Germans [who happened to be Jews] with the East European Bolsheviks [not all of whom were Jews] is par for the course. You often throw names like Weizman, Jabotinsky, Phillipe Rothschild etc. when you proffer these pro-NSDAP [better know as Nazis] tropes. Yet it is a rather straightforward matter, turning these particularist arguments on their heads, by simply noting that none of these 'Big Jews' owed any particular allegiance to Germany. To Britain, the Czar and France: certainly, and they shouldered those responsibilities admirably. That the Balfour Declaration was payment for a job well done - well what of it?

    Assimilation was not good enough for zionist Jews: key to the zionist Jewish mindset is the notion that Jews must be in charge
     
    Assimilation is an idea resisted by all human groups: it is called social choice; but that in no way precludes fealty to the country in which such groups claim and receive citizenship. If the Zionist mindset yearns to be in charge, so does the Italian, the British, the American, the Chinese, the Japanese, the Nigerian, the Iranian, and the Zambian. It might be coded in our DNA, broadly referred to as the human condition.

    The reality is Jews left Germany, under the directive of Louis Brandeis, after Brandeis & other zionist and Jewish leaders recognized that the vision they conceived in the aftermath of WWI and the German Revolution in 1918, of Jews successfully taking control of Germany, failed: Jews were a dominant force in Weimar and Weimar was a failure, politically, intellectually, financially and culturally.
     
    I would not call it a directive; more like sound advice on account of the slaughter that follwed. So if the Jews had failed in their sinister plot to take over Germany in 1918, how does that reconcile with you subsequent claim that Jews were undermining Germany from their internal control?

    The two paragraphs that follow the block I highlighted immediately above, are pathetic. Jewish immigration to the U.S. whether the result of opportunities or asylum, aided or not by prominent American Jews who were citizens of the U.S., presents no crime as such, does it? There is no requirement that individuals or citizen advocacy groups engage the channels of immigration, observing some strict requirement of uniformity administered to all nationalities. It has never been so in the U.S. That Jewish American citizens advocated for Jewish immigration, is no different from any other group or groups [WASPs e.g.] that have historically advocated immigration for their own kith and kin and, not to put too fine a point on it, had actually resisted immigration from southern and eastern Europe and prevented it from Asia.


    In their myth-history, on their way out Jews destroy the states where they had earlier dwelt prosperously, Egypt is the model.
     
    Right you are. Would you care for a bit of that 'Prosperity'? I hear the Saudis, wearing the modern mantle of Pharaonic traditions are happy to oblige.

    I oppose the WB Zionists and their facilitators in this country, but the more I read such accounting of Jews as viruses, the less constant I feel in my resolve, that people can get past - once again - the Human Condition.

    Hello Sam and welcome back!

    Not to jump in here, it was just this one quip of yours that I wanted to respond to..

    That the Balfour Declaration was payment for a job well done – well what of it?

    This is a nice little treatise by one of your fellow Jews. A smart and connected man, he knew of what he spoke

    http://www.themodernreligion.com/jihad/freedman.html

    when I read this decades ago, it was a kind of red pill for me back then

    I had marinated in ‘the narrative’ for so long, it hit me like a ton of bricks

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    I will keep this brief, acknowledging Fran's advise to limit discussion (mostly) to the columnist's topic at hand.

    I am familiar with Ben Freedman's extemporaneous speech. There are many aspects in the prosecution of a war. Procuring the correct allies and proper use of diplomacy is part and parcel of it. The simple historical fact is that The British and their allies - the French and Russians, but mostly the British - were far more effective at it as the final results revealed.

    One can go as far back as one wishes in the European theatre to essentially witness that the Germans were every bit as covetous as any organised country, in their attempts to gain territory, economic resources and colonial assets of the day. So do spare me the hurt glances. They were simply outmanoeuvred by the British et al.

    And I have never claimed that the Zionists did not have their own motives, which was to carve out a piece of Palestine. They were more or less rebuffed by Germany, but struck a deal with the British. That is how the great powers have always played the game.

    Notice I have not inserted any value judgments of our present day on the plain story of the past: we can, and I do, especially in the context of the Palestinian situation; but that is another matter altogether, another challenge to overcome what I have called the human condition.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. @Sam Shama

    First, consider the status of Jews in Germany vis a vis Germans in Germany: which was the “invading” force and which was the indigenous body?
     
    You cannot mean that German Jews as a group were actively plotting against their country; or perhaps you do mean it, for it matters not at at all, Jews being eternal non-citizens definitionally, grouping Germans [who happened to be Jews] with the East European Bolsheviks [not all of whom were Jews] is par for the course. You often throw names like Weizman, Jabotinsky, Phillipe Rothschild etc. when you proffer these pro-NSDAP [better know as Nazis] tropes. Yet it is a rather straightforward matter, turning these particularist arguments on their heads, by simply noting that none of these 'Big Jews' owed any particular allegiance to Germany. To Britain, the Czar and France: certainly, and they shouldered those responsibilities admirably. That the Balfour Declaration was payment for a job well done - well what of it?

    Assimilation was not good enough for zionist Jews: key to the zionist Jewish mindset is the notion that Jews must be in charge
     
    Assimilation is an idea resisted by all human groups: it is called social choice; but that in no way precludes fealty to the country in which such groups claim and receive citizenship. If the Zionist mindset yearns to be in charge, so does the Italian, the British, the American, the Chinese, the Japanese, the Nigerian, the Iranian, and the Zambian. It might be coded in our DNA, broadly referred to as the human condition.

    The reality is Jews left Germany, under the directive of Louis Brandeis, after Brandeis & other zionist and Jewish leaders recognized that the vision they conceived in the aftermath of WWI and the German Revolution in 1918, of Jews successfully taking control of Germany, failed: Jews were a dominant force in Weimar and Weimar was a failure, politically, intellectually, financially and culturally.
     
    I would not call it a directive; more like sound advice on account of the slaughter that follwed. So if the Jews had failed in their sinister plot to take over Germany in 1918, how does that reconcile with you subsequent claim that Jews were undermining Germany from their internal control?

    The two paragraphs that follow the block I highlighted immediately above, are pathetic. Jewish immigration to the U.S. whether the result of opportunities or asylum, aided or not by prominent American Jews who were citizens of the U.S., presents no crime as such, does it? There is no requirement that individuals or citizen advocacy groups engage the channels of immigration, observing some strict requirement of uniformity administered to all nationalities. It has never been so in the U.S. That Jewish American citizens advocated for Jewish immigration, is no different from any other group or groups [WASPs e.g.] that have historically advocated immigration for their own kith and kin and, not to put too fine a point on it, had actually resisted immigration from southern and eastern Europe and prevented it from Asia.


    In their myth-history, on their way out Jews destroy the states where they had earlier dwelt prosperously, Egypt is the model.
     
    Right you are. Would you care for a bit of that 'Prosperity'? I hear the Saudis, wearing the modern mantle of Pharaonic traditions are happy to oblige.

    I oppose the WB Zionists and their facilitators in this country, but the more I read such accounting of Jews as viruses, the less constant I feel in my resolve, that people can get past - once again - the Human Condition.

    I’m not sure it’s worth engaging some of these solopsistic commenters. Their delusions – if they are not rather interlopers out to discredit legitimate critique by proximity to over the top antisemitism – are impregnable. Either way, facts will never change their habits. The only reason to post is then to engage with the original author’s writing, or in extremis to act as an antidote to the smear attempts to discredit him. Maybe some naive but otherwise fair soul who might get sucked in otherwise by some of the deceptive comments will see how easily they are debunked.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Junior

    Their delusions – if they are not rather interlopers out to discredit legitimate critique by proximity to over the top antisemitism – are impregnable.
     
    I know exactly what you mean in your post to Sam, Fran. I think that a few of them ARE genuinely mislead but the MAJORITY of them are "interlopers out to discredit legitimate critique by proximity to over the top antisemitism" and attempting to smear Mr. Giraldi. They have no rational arguments that they can make in defense of Israel's abhorrent actions because the truth is the truth, and so they resort to trying to turn people off to the truth by flooding his comments section with disgusting anti-Semitism.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. Old Jew says:
    @Clyde

    Not that long ago,may be 3 yrs ago, US agreed to sell 40 billion worth of military supplies to Saudi and Gulf . To balance and to preserve the” Israeli upper hand”.
     
    Then Israel should get $40 million too. The Zionists got ripped off by Obama! Israel gets about 3 billion a year, mostly in military aid that must be spent with US arms manufacturers.

    Not the same!

    Saudi pay.

    Israel receives for free.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde

    Not the same! Saudi pay. Israel receives for free.
     
    Because the Saudis are rich as can be from petroleum. And soon "the Jews" will be too with their new off shore natural gas fields that Bad Vlad and his crew will include under the emerging Russian MiddleEast-Iran defense umbrella.
    About 15 years ago I read a Rand Institute estimate that Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the other Gulf oil states got 40 billion a year in free American aid in the form of the US Navy protecting the regional oil shipping lanes. This number must be roughly similar today under commie-Bama.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. RobinG says:
    @Sam Shama

    First, consider the status of Jews in Germany vis a vis Germans in Germany: which was the “invading” force and which was the indigenous body?
     
    You cannot mean that German Jews as a group were actively plotting against their country; or perhaps you do mean it, for it matters not at at all, Jews being eternal non-citizens definitionally, grouping Germans [who happened to be Jews] with the East European Bolsheviks [not all of whom were Jews] is par for the course. You often throw names like Weizman, Jabotinsky, Phillipe Rothschild etc. when you proffer these pro-NSDAP [better know as Nazis] tropes. Yet it is a rather straightforward matter, turning these particularist arguments on their heads, by simply noting that none of these 'Big Jews' owed any particular allegiance to Germany. To Britain, the Czar and France: certainly, and they shouldered those responsibilities admirably. That the Balfour Declaration was payment for a job well done - well what of it?

    Assimilation was not good enough for zionist Jews: key to the zionist Jewish mindset is the notion that Jews must be in charge
     
    Assimilation is an idea resisted by all human groups: it is called social choice; but that in no way precludes fealty to the country in which such groups claim and receive citizenship. If the Zionist mindset yearns to be in charge, so does the Italian, the British, the American, the Chinese, the Japanese, the Nigerian, the Iranian, and the Zambian. It might be coded in our DNA, broadly referred to as the human condition.

    The reality is Jews left Germany, under the directive of Louis Brandeis, after Brandeis & other zionist and Jewish leaders recognized that the vision they conceived in the aftermath of WWI and the German Revolution in 1918, of Jews successfully taking control of Germany, failed: Jews were a dominant force in Weimar and Weimar was a failure, politically, intellectually, financially and culturally.
     
    I would not call it a directive; more like sound advice on account of the slaughter that follwed. So if the Jews had failed in their sinister plot to take over Germany in 1918, how does that reconcile with you subsequent claim that Jews were undermining Germany from their internal control?

    The two paragraphs that follow the block I highlighted immediately above, are pathetic. Jewish immigration to the U.S. whether the result of opportunities or asylum, aided or not by prominent American Jews who were citizens of the U.S., presents no crime as such, does it? There is no requirement that individuals or citizen advocacy groups engage the channels of immigration, observing some strict requirement of uniformity administered to all nationalities. It has never been so in the U.S. That Jewish American citizens advocated for Jewish immigration, is no different from any other group or groups [WASPs e.g.] that have historically advocated immigration for their own kith and kin and, not to put too fine a point on it, had actually resisted immigration from southern and eastern Europe and prevented it from Asia.


    In their myth-history, on their way out Jews destroy the states where they had earlier dwelt prosperously, Egypt is the model.
     
    Right you are. Would you care for a bit of that 'Prosperity'? I hear the Saudis, wearing the modern mantle of Pharaonic traditions are happy to oblige.

    I oppose the WB Zionists and their facilitators in this country, but the more I read such accounting of Jews as viruses, the less constant I feel in my resolve, that people can get past - once again - the Human Condition.

    Sam,

    “– the Human Condition.”

    There’s no escape. So what are we to do?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. Art says:
    @Sam Shama

    First, consider the status of Jews in Germany vis a vis Germans in Germany: which was the “invading” force and which was the indigenous body?
     
    You cannot mean that German Jews as a group were actively plotting against their country; or perhaps you do mean it, for it matters not at at all, Jews being eternal non-citizens definitionally, grouping Germans [who happened to be Jews] with the East European Bolsheviks [not all of whom were Jews] is par for the course. You often throw names like Weizman, Jabotinsky, Phillipe Rothschild etc. when you proffer these pro-NSDAP [better know as Nazis] tropes. Yet it is a rather straightforward matter, turning these particularist arguments on their heads, by simply noting that none of these 'Big Jews' owed any particular allegiance to Germany. To Britain, the Czar and France: certainly, and they shouldered those responsibilities admirably. That the Balfour Declaration was payment for a job well done - well what of it?

    Assimilation was not good enough for zionist Jews: key to the zionist Jewish mindset is the notion that Jews must be in charge
     
    Assimilation is an idea resisted by all human groups: it is called social choice; but that in no way precludes fealty to the country in which such groups claim and receive citizenship. If the Zionist mindset yearns to be in charge, so does the Italian, the British, the American, the Chinese, the Japanese, the Nigerian, the Iranian, and the Zambian. It might be coded in our DNA, broadly referred to as the human condition.

    The reality is Jews left Germany, under the directive of Louis Brandeis, after Brandeis & other zionist and Jewish leaders recognized that the vision they conceived in the aftermath of WWI and the German Revolution in 1918, of Jews successfully taking control of Germany, failed: Jews were a dominant force in Weimar and Weimar was a failure, politically, intellectually, financially and culturally.
     
    I would not call it a directive; more like sound advice on account of the slaughter that follwed. So if the Jews had failed in their sinister plot to take over Germany in 1918, how does that reconcile with you subsequent claim that Jews were undermining Germany from their internal control?

    The two paragraphs that follow the block I highlighted immediately above, are pathetic. Jewish immigration to the U.S. whether the result of opportunities or asylum, aided or not by prominent American Jews who were citizens of the U.S., presents no crime as such, does it? There is no requirement that individuals or citizen advocacy groups engage the channels of immigration, observing some strict requirement of uniformity administered to all nationalities. It has never been so in the U.S. That Jewish American citizens advocated for Jewish immigration, is no different from any other group or groups [WASPs e.g.] that have historically advocated immigration for their own kith and kin and, not to put too fine a point on it, had actually resisted immigration from southern and eastern Europe and prevented it from Asia.


    In their myth-history, on their way out Jews destroy the states where they had earlier dwelt prosperously, Egypt is the model.
     
    Right you are. Would you care for a bit of that 'Prosperity'? I hear the Saudis, wearing the modern mantle of Pharaonic traditions are happy to oblige.

    I oppose the WB Zionists and their facilitators in this country, but the more I read such accounting of Jews as viruses, the less constant I feel in my resolve, that people can get past - once again - the Human Condition.

    I oppose the WB Zionists and their facilitators in this country, but the more I read such accounting of Jews as viruses, the less constant I feel in my resolve, that people can get past – once again – the Human Condition.

    Sam,

    We humans have inherent good traits and bad traits. One side of the Human Condition promotes tribalness, pyramid top down coercion, and zero-sum thinking. On the other side of the Human Condition we find a hopefulness, kindness, and forgiveness that is exemplified in Christian philosophy.

    Why is it so often that the Jews (Big and Little) are found on the negative coercive side of the Human Condition, taking advantage of the worst side of our humanness?

    Art

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. KA says:
    @Clyde

    Not that long ago,may be 3 yrs ago, US agreed to sell 40 billion worth of military supplies to Saudi and Gulf . To balance and to preserve the” Israeli upper hand”.
     
    Then Israel should get $40 million too. The Zionists got ripped off by Obama! Israel gets about 3 billion a year, mostly in military aid that must be spent with US arms manufacturers.

    Israeli supporters should do openly and in full view of the informed people , and hopefully Americans could hear from CNN ,NYT,FOX and doesn’t have to come to this site or to this one, http://www.ifamericansknew.org/stat/usaid.html

    Well ,then whole American will be called antisemites or who knows , might be accused of enforcing Yellow Ribbon .

    -”JERUSALEM — In a stinging rebuke to Israel, the European Union insisted on Wednesday that some goods produced on land seized in the 1967 war must be labeled “made in settlements,” a mandate that added to Israel’s deep unease over a growing international boycott.
    From Our Advertisers

    European officials tried to play down the decision, saying the guidelines merely clarified existing rules. But the move exacerbated already simmering tensions between Israel and Europe as Israeli politicians condemned it as an echo of the Holocaust-era branding of European Jews and their storefronts with yellow stars.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/12/world/middleeast/eu-labels-israeli-settlements.html?src=me&_r=0

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde

    Well ,then whole American will be called antisemites or who knows , might be accused of enforcing Yellow Ribbon .
     
    Do you deny that half the posters here are anti-Semites? I mean lets call a spade a spade. Aside from lame jokes that the definition of anti-Semite is anyone Jews don't like. The usual real world situation (as opposed to the fantasies here) is someone doesn't like Jews and Jews don't like him. Meaning the hatred is mutual.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. KA [AKA "Carthage"] says:
    @Clyde

    Not that long ago,may be 3 yrs ago, US agreed to sell 40 billion worth of military supplies to Saudi and Gulf . To balance and to preserve the” Israeli upper hand”.
     
    Then Israel should get $40 million too. The Zionists got ripped off by Obama! Israel gets about 3 billion a year, mostly in military aid that must be spent with US arms manufacturers.

    “In 2007, the Bush Administration and the Israeli government agreed to a 10-year, $30 billion military aid package for the period from FY2009 to FY2018. During his March 2013 visit to Israel, President Obama pledged that the United States would continue to provide Israel with multi-year commitments of military aid subject to the approval of Congress. This week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will be seeking a 10-year, $50 billion military aid package to succeed the current arrangement. The United States is pledged to insure that Israel commands a “qualitative military edge” over its neighbors.”

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/9/bruce-fein-end-mideast-arms-sales-nonhumanitarian-/print/

    From same article -”Since October 2010, President Obama has notified Congress of proposed sales to Saudi Arabia of fighter aircraft, helicopters, missile defense systems, missiles, bombs, armed vehicles, and related equipment and services exceeding $90 billion.

    In 2014, the United States approved weapons sales to Iraq approaching $15 billion.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. Sam Shama says:
    @Rurik
    Hello Sam and welcome back!

    Not to jump in here, it was just this one quip of yours that I wanted to respond to..

    That the Balfour Declaration was payment for a job well done – well what of it?
     
    This is a nice little treatise by one of your fellow Jews. A smart and connected man, he knew of what he spoke

    http://www.themodernreligion.com/jihad/freedman.html

    when I read this decades ago, it was a kind of red pill for me back then

    I had marinated in 'the narrative' for so long, it hit me like a ton of bricks

    I will keep this brief, acknowledging Fran’s advise to limit discussion (mostly) to the columnist’s topic at hand.

    I am familiar with Ben Freedman’s extemporaneous speech. There are many aspects in the prosecution of a war. Procuring the correct allies and proper use of diplomacy is part and parcel of it. The simple historical fact is that The British and their allies – the French and Russians, but mostly the British – were far more effective at it as the final results revealed.

    One can go as far back as one wishes in the European theatre to essentially witness that the Germans were every bit as covetous as any organised country, in their attempts to gain territory, economic resources and colonial assets of the day. So do spare me the hurt glances. They were simply outmanoeuvred by the British et al.

    And I have never claimed that the Zionists did not have their own motives, which was to carve out a piece of Palestine. They were more or less rebuffed by Germany, but struck a deal with the British. That is how the great powers have always played the game.

    Notice I have not inserted any value judgments of our present day on the plain story of the past: we can, and I do, especially in the context of the Palestinian situation; but that is another matter altogether, another challenge to overcome what I have called the human condition.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    P.S.: Art and RobinG

    Surely humans have a benevolent and a malevolent side. The struggle is to at least suppress the latter. In that regard I will say that among the Abrahamic religions, Christianity offers a simpler and elegant set of principles, but probably underestimates the cunning nature of the bi-pedal creature.

    The solution: I am still searching, but it must start from the individual, by recognising one's own shortcomings and working towards the common good. It should be easier today with social media etc., should it not?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. Sam Shama says:
    @Sam Shama
    I will keep this brief, acknowledging Fran's advise to limit discussion (mostly) to the columnist's topic at hand.

    I am familiar with Ben Freedman's extemporaneous speech. There are many aspects in the prosecution of a war. Procuring the correct allies and proper use of diplomacy is part and parcel of it. The simple historical fact is that The British and their allies - the French and Russians, but mostly the British - were far more effective at it as the final results revealed.

    One can go as far back as one wishes in the European theatre to essentially witness that the Germans were every bit as covetous as any organised country, in their attempts to gain territory, economic resources and colonial assets of the day. So do spare me the hurt glances. They were simply outmanoeuvred by the British et al.

    And I have never claimed that the Zionists did not have their own motives, which was to carve out a piece of Palestine. They were more or less rebuffed by Germany, but struck a deal with the British. That is how the great powers have always played the game.

    Notice I have not inserted any value judgments of our present day on the plain story of the past: we can, and I do, especially in the context of the Palestinian situation; but that is another matter altogether, another challenge to overcome what I have called the human condition.

    P.S.: Art and RobinG

    Surely humans have a benevolent and a malevolent side. The struggle is to at least suppress the latter. In that regard I will say that among the Abrahamic religions, Christianity offers a simpler and elegant set of principles, but probably underestimates the cunning nature of the bi-pedal creature.

    The solution: I am still searching, but it must start from the individual, by recognising one’s own shortcomings and working towards the common good. It should be easier today with social media etc., should it not?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
    Hi Sam

    I would note Christianity is a schizophrenic religion divided between Yeshua and Saul. Never will the teaching of the two converge, they travel divergent paths. The end result is there are always 'Christians' on both sides of nearly every controversy; from the left to center right more those of the 'simple and elegant' Yeshua persuasion and on the neo-conservative right the 'cunning bi-pedal' of the accomplished liar Saul. But with the rise of neo-liberalism, the distinction is becoming less clear. In more or less all cases, on both sides of the divide, this schism is treated dishonestly for the collective social fear of facing a profound internal religious dissonance where one of the faith's great teachers cannot be reconciled to the other.
    , @Art
    Surely humans have a benevolent and a malevolent side. The struggle is to at least suppress the latter.

    Sam,

    Good is not the absence of bad – good has to be created – good is a product of actual work. Good can only happen when effort is expended.

    Our time is limited. Time spent suppressing bad is wasted time – it is not time spent working on good. On a plus minus scale – suppressing bad only gets you back to zero. It does not produce the good things that we need to sustain ourselves.

    The answer to bad people is to have nothing to do with them – to ostracize them – thus freeing one’s self for creative work that does good life extending things.

    Art
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. KA [AKA "Carthage"] says:
    @Ivan
    India with 1.2 billions is a world by itself. There are countless races and religions holding the balance in a matrix of forces and co-operation. This is the way most Indians, like myself like it. It ensures for one thing that we don't get the kind of "development" that China had with its mass starvations. We have our freedoms, with no thanks to the RSS-BJP combine. The majority of Indians have a live and let live attitude, but the Hindu fascists want to target the minority Muslims and Christians in order to pursue their agenda of a neverland of Hindu purity based on partly on cow-worship. The majority of Indians, Hindu or otherwise don't buy it as can be seen from the elections in Bihar.

    RSS is not India .Neither the Zionist can claim to represent all Jewish people . But majority just want to get along and keep to themselves

    I am sure large number of Hindus area aghast at this Fatwa -

    “NEW DELHI: RSS mouthpiece, Panchjanya, has justified the killing of Mohammad Akhlaq over rumours that he had eaten and stored beef in his house., in its latest edition has said the Vedas order the killing of ‘sinners’ who slaughter cows, reported Indian Express.

    The RSS weekly alleges that Muslim leadership teach Muslims to hate the Indian’s traditions.”

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/RSS-mouthpiece-says-Vedas-ordered-killing-of-cow-killers/articleshow/49437196.cms

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. Rurik says:

    acknowledging Fran’s advise to limit discussion

    well Fran plays fast and loose with acusations of ‘anti-Semitism’, but for the record, I never said anything about Jews deserving to suffer. What I did say was that it’s wrong to want to see any innocent people suffer, even innocent Germans (if you believe there is such a thing) or anyone else for that matter- for things they had no part of. If that makes me an anti-Semite, then so be it

    No one is pooh-poohing diplomacy Sam. What is salient is the use of treachery and ignoble betrayal to achieve one’s nefarious goals, like tricking your foe into laying down his arms in a gesture of mutual diplomatic respect in a sort of white flag treaty, only to betray that diplomacy and attack you opponent once he’s disarmed- and then starve him into selling his progeny into slavery. Diplomacy is one thing, but the Brits were all too well known for duplicity and sticking knives into backs. Nothing to be proud of, even if you were ‘victorious’.

    As for value judgments, there are times in history when they should be made. Cruelty for its own sake, dishonesty, treachery as I’ve mentioned and genocide are a short list that to my mind are things that are reprehensible and vile sins that stain the fabric of your character, whether individual or national, even when it’s done to “win”.

    To this day people like Benedict Arnold, Quisling, Stalin, Judas and most recently Merkel are names that will live in infamy as name/words that describe a type of person that you don’t want to be. Justifiably and universally reviled, they are examples of the human condition at its worst. Moral relativism is the refuge of the scoundrel, and history can and should be a harsh judge. At least in my humble opinion. ; )

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik
    oops

    the above post was meant for Sam (and Fran ; )
    , @Sam Shama

    What is salient is the use of treachery and ignoble betrayal to achieve one’s nefarious goals, like tricking your foe into laying down his arms in a gesture of mutual diplomatic respect in a sort of white flag treaty, only to betray that diplomacy and attack you opponent once he’s disarmed- and then starve him into selling his progeny into slavery.
     
    Rurik,
    Its been a long day at work.

    You have used a number of charged terms: 'nefarious', 'ignoble', 'white flag treaty' among others. One should use those terms under careful advisement.

    Once again I will strive to keep this short in the interest of limiting the discussion of off-topic threads.

    I question your use of Freedman's version of of the proceedings for the war period 1914-1919, by noting that his was a flawed version, not just in the factual accounting of events but more so in its failure to clearly distinguish responsibilities of various parties, including Zionist leaders who showed up in numbers at Versailles to secure a promise made to them by the British.

    We are not imposing value judgements at this juncture; but we can, and will in due course.

    First, other than a few, short and sharp German successes in early 1914, the War was very much in stalemate through 1917. It was the Allied Spring offensive of 1918 followed by the Summer, including the U.S., by that time,which sealed Germany's fate and they sued for an armistice; they could have carried on, much like the exhausted Brits, just prior to Spring 1918, but they did not, did they? [ American zionists as American citizens lobbied successfully to procure American participation, and that was the clinching factor, but it is hardly the principal reason why America went to war; it saw great commercial and Industrial opportunity in an expectedly defeated postwar Germany] So the Germans lost, signed an armistice and the victorious allies continued to exact punishment on the German population until they saw their way clear to go to Versailles. If that is what you call 'ignoble', you would be wrong, since Germany would have done precisely the same, as they had amply demonstrated in previous wars with Russia and France.

    This was war.

    What was the treachery? On the part of which German Jew?

    Walther Rathenau whose name Freedman bandies carelessly in that screed, was a loyal German citizen who built one of the most successful German companies, AEG, and helped Germany during the blockade to manage its dwindling resources, was beseeched by the republic to be its Foreign Minister. He did accept that responsibility and shepherded Germany through the Treaty of Rapallo with the nascent Soviet Union and Versailles, only to be assassinated by the extreme Right. The Right in Germany [including the military leadership corps] conveniently and absurdly blamed the Jews for their own failure to win the Spring Offensive, and precipitated Rathenau's assassination. Many years later Rathenau's assassin [one of them I think] saw the mistake of his actions [especially after he received a letter from Rathenau's mother forgiving him] and condemned the Nazis, stating something along the lines of 'It is your philosophy that brought ruin to Germany in the past!'

    So who are you calling a traitor? Weizmann? Jabotinsky? Arlozoroff? None of these men were German and owed no allegiance to Germany! They correctly backed the winner and demanded that the victor honour their pledge in the form of the Balfour Declaration.

    That is about the long of it.


    Now we can come to the value judgements. There are a few, and I choose only to highlight one: British support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, even with its cryptic protections extended to native populations, was tenuous at best. Palestine was not their's to carve. But such has always been the game of the Great Powers.

    And that is about the short of it.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:
    @RobinG
    "The majority of our Congressmen are NOT Jewish, but they ARE Zionists."

    Well, the majority of our Congressmen are kowtowing to politically organized Jews, i.e. AIPAC, CFIJA, CFI, LFI, CRIF etc’. Even J-Street is primarily dedicated to a jewish supremacist Israel.

    “The wealthy Jews control the world, in their hands lies the fate of governments and nations. They set governments one against the other. When the wealthy Jews play, the nations and the rulers dance. One way or the other, they get rich.” (Theodor Herzl, Deutsche Zeitung)

    Well, the majority of our Congressmen are kowtowing to politically organized Jews

    “Politically organized” is the KEY in your statement. And what are they politically organized to promote? They are NOT promoting the Jewish religion. They are promoting support for Israel. They are Zionists.

    Blame Jewish-Zionists, Christian-Zionists, Hindu-Zionists, Muslim-Zionists, Atheistic-Zionists, Buddhist-Zionists, and Followers of the Prophet/Profit- Zionists. Blame ANYONE who puts the interests of Israel over the interests of America. Blame the political ideology of supporting Israel that they are politically organized to promote, Zionism.

    The following is from the TrueTorahJews website:

    “While Herzl claimed that the establishment of a “Jewish” state would cure anti-Semitism, he also promoted anti-Semitism to further his cause.

    Herzl stated in his diary:

    “It would be an excellent idea to call in respectable, accredited anti-Semites as liquidators of property. To the people they would vouch for the fact that we do not wish to bring about the impoverishment of the countries that we leave. At first they must not be given large fees for this; otherwise we shall spoil our instruments and make them despicable as ‘stooges of the Jews.’ Later their fees will increase, and in the end we shall have only Gentile officials in the countries from which we have emigrated. The anti-Semites will become our most dependable friends, the anti-Semitic countries our allies.” (The Complete Diaries of Theodor Herzl. Vol. 1, edited by Raphael Patai, translated by Harry Zohn, page 83-84)

    The Israeli Historian Benny Morris described how Herzl foresaw how anti-Semitism could be harnessed for the realization of Zionism. He stated:

    “Herzl regarded Zionism’s triumph as inevitable, not only because life in Europe was ever more untenable for Jews, but also because it was in Europe’s interests to rid the Jews and relieved of anti-Semitism: The European political establishment would eventually be persuaded to promote Zionism. Herzl recognized that anti-Semitism would be harnessed to his own–Zionist-purposes.” (Righteous Victims, p. 21) ”

    A.K.A., you are being used as a tool by the Zionists to further their cause by promoting anti-Semitism.

    http://www.truetorahjews.org/herzl

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    If you want to construe anything I've said (or my quoting Hertzl) as anti-Jewish, that's your problem. Similarly, Canada has just found Arthur Topham guilty for satirizing - and thereby exposing - T.N. Kaufman's "Germany Must Perish".

    http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/2015/11/13/arthur-topham-vs-theodore-nathan-kaufman

    By Gilad Atzmon

    Arthur Topham, the man behind Radical Press, was found guilty yesterday on one count of communicating statements that “wilfully promote hatred against an identifiable group.”

    Some Canadians such as Harry Abrams, former B.C. representative for the League of Human Rights for B’nai Brith Canada, were thrilled. “Canada says that you should be able to walk in peace and not be fearful to be victimized, to be vilified, because of who you are or who you were born as,” Abrams told CBC News. But Topham, who has been married to a Jewish woman for over 37 years, doesn’t criticise or vilify Jews for who they are or the family into which they were born. He actually criticises some Jews, like Abrams, who subscribe to some particularly noxious tribally exclusive politics and ideology. Topham must have wrongly assumed that in a Western society, all forms of politics and ideologies, including Jewish ones, must be subject to criticism.

    Topham’s case is full of surprises. Topham was found guilty on ‘count one’ but not guilty on ‘count two.’ But the two counts are pretty much identical in meaning, content and context. Both counts refer to “communication of statements, other than in private conversation, that wilfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.“ The two counts differ only in the dates they cover.

    Some commentators and legal experts speculated yesterday what led the jury to form such an inconsistent ruling. The documents, books and texts disseminated by Topham on his site (The Radical Press) within the period covered by both counts are all widely available to the Canadian public on many on-line outlets including amazon.ca. The one document on Topham’s site that has not been widely available recently is: ‘Israel Must Perish!’

    In fact, ‘Israel Must Perish!’ is a hateful text. It promotes hatred against an ‘identifiable group.’ The book advocates the genocide through sterilization of all Israelisand the territorial dismemberment of Zion. The text is a deeply problematic pamphlet that demands the strongest possible condemnation, except that it wasn’t really written by Arthur Topham. ‘Israel Must Perish!’ was actually written by a politically driven Zionist Jew named Theodore N. Kaufman in 1941 under the title ‘Germany Must Perish!’ While ‘Germany Must Perish!’, is advocating the extinction of all Germans, Topham’s ‘Israel Must Perish!’ is clearly a satire, quoting as it does,verbaitm from Kaufman’s original (He substitutes the word ‘Israel’ for ‘Germany’ and ‘Zionist(s) for German(s).)

    Topham’s satire, published in 2011, was obviously intended to make Israelis and Zionists reflect on their politics following a decade of extensive Jewish lobby advocacy of more and more immoral interventionist wars (Iraq, Syria, Libya, Iran etc). ‘Israeli Must Perish!’ is a mirror placed in front of the forgotten Kaufman’s ‘Germany Must Perish!’ Presumably, Topham saw some applicability of a critique of Germany in 1941 to Israel and global Zionism today.

    If history is the attempt to narrate the past as we move along, then the return to Kaufman’s text couldn’t be more timely and essential. In an interview in the September 26, 1941, issue of The Canadian Jewish Chronicle, Kaufman attempted to justify his plan for the “sterilization of all Germans". He said:

    “I believe, that the Jews have a mission in life. They must see to it that the nations of the world get together in one vast federation. ‘Union Now’ is the beginning of this. Slowly but surely the world will develop into a paradise. We will have perpetual peace. And the Jews will do the most to bring about this confederation, because they have the most to gain. … Let us sterilize all Germans and wars of world domination will come to an end!” (Harold U. Ribalow (September 26, 1941). "Hitler Will Be Nothing But A Rosebud Says Author 'Germany Must Perish!'. One Man's Plan For Peace Forever". The Canadian Jewish Chronicle. p. 5. Retrieved December 4, 2011.)

    At the time, Kaufman’s book was widely quoted in Germany as evidence of a Jewish plan for genocide against the German people. Goebbels wrote,

    “Thanks to the Jew Kaufman, we Germans know only too well what to expect in case of defeat.”

    American journalist Howard K. Smith was in Germany when Germany Must Perish! became known. He wrote:

    “No man has ever done so irresponsible a disservice to the cause his nation is fighting and suffering for than Nathan Kaufman. His half-baked brochure provided the Nazis with one of the best light artillery pieces they have, for, used as the Nazis used it, it served to bolster up that terror which forces Germans who dislike the Nazis to support, fight and die to keep Nazism alive ...”( Howard K. Smith, Last Train from Berlin (London: Phoenix Pr., 1942), 134)

    When the Jews of Hanover were evicted on September 8, 1941, the local authorities cited Kaufman's book as one of the reasons. The well respected German philosopher and historian Ernst Nolte argued recently that the German reaction to ‘Germany Must Perish!’ supports his view that WWIIwas a genuine response to German knowledge of a worldwide Jewish plot.

    And yet, Kaufman’s book was concealed for 7 decades. It didn’t fit into the Zionist Shoah narrative. It was, in fact, Arthur Topham and his crude satire that brought Kaufman’s hateful text to our attention.

    Topham’s crime is obvious, the radical man is guilty of unveiling some shameful corners in Jewish past, exposing some documents Jews would prefer to keep deep under the carpet.

    If Topham has to be penalised for contextualizing Israeli present within a Jewish historical continuum, we may have to accept it. Within the western ethos often enough the brave truth teller pays heavily for other people’s sins. But we should never forget that that within the same Western ethos, the truth has the unique capacity to resurrect itself.



    Make sure to save a copy of Germany Must Perish! onto your HD before it is removed by the Canadian thought police: http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=1314
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. Clyde says:
    @Old Jew
    Not the same!

    Saudi pay.

    Israel receives for free.

    Not the same! Saudi pay. Israel receives for free.

    Because the Saudis are rich as can be from petroleum. And soon “the Jews” will be too with their new off shore natural gas fields that Bad Vlad and his crew will include under the emerging Russian MiddleEast-Iran defense umbrella.
    About 15 years ago I read a Rand Institute estimate that Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the other Gulf oil states got 40 billion a year in free American aid in the form of the US Navy protecting the regional oil shipping lanes. This number must be roughly similar today under commie-Bama.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. Clyde says:
    @Ivan
    The Hindu buggers got it from Will Durant who was of the pre-internet age. Muslim conquerors were responsible for genocides as can be read from Crowds and Power by Elias.Canetti. But they could never have anywhere near 80 millions. The population at the turn of the 20th century was about 1 billion. Extrapolate it back to see if this figure is plausible. Not everything done in the name of Islam is due to the Arabs and Persians. The Mongols who devastated Baghdad were pretty much in action in India too.

    I get your thinking. What do you think the Hindu population was back then and what percentage was killed by the Islamic invaders? You don’t like the 80 million number. What to make a guess? My opinion it was a very high number. 20% at least, and up to 40% of Hindus slaughtered.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. Rurik says:
    @Rurik

    acknowledging Fran’s advise to limit discussion
     
    well Fran plays fast and loose with acusations of 'anti-Semitism', but for the record, I never said anything about Jews deserving to suffer. What I did say was that it's wrong to want to see any innocent people suffer, even innocent Germans (if you believe there is such a thing) or anyone else for that matter- for things they had no part of. If that makes me an anti-Semite, then so be it

    No one is pooh-poohing diplomacy Sam. What is salient is the use of treachery and ignoble betrayal to achieve one's nefarious goals, like tricking your foe into laying down his arms in a gesture of mutual diplomatic respect in a sort of white flag treaty, only to betray that diplomacy and attack you opponent once he's disarmed- and then starve him into selling his progeny into slavery. Diplomacy is one thing, but the Brits were all too well known for duplicity and sticking knives into backs. Nothing to be proud of, even if you were 'victorious'.

    As for value judgments, there are times in history when they should be made. Cruelty for its own sake, dishonesty, treachery as I've mentioned and genocide are a short list that to my mind are things that are reprehensible and vile sins that stain the fabric of your character, whether individual or national, even when it's done to "win".

    To this day people like Benedict Arnold, Quisling, Stalin, Judas and most recently Merkel are names that will live in infamy as name/words that describe a type of person that you don't want to be. Justifiably and universally reviled, they are examples of the human condition at its worst. Moral relativism is the refuge of the scoundrel, and history can and should be a harsh judge. At least in my humble opinion. ; )

    oops

    the above post was meant for Sam (and Fran ; )

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. Clyde says:
    @KA
    Israeli supporters should do openly and in full view of the informed people , and hopefully Americans could hear from CNN ,NYT,FOX and doesn't have to come to this site or to this one, http://www.ifamericansknew.org/stat/usaid.html

    Well ,then whole American will be called antisemites or who knows , might be accused of enforcing Yellow Ribbon .

    -"JERUSALEM — In a stinging rebuke to Israel, the European Union insisted on Wednesday that some goods produced on land seized in the 1967 war must be labeled “made in settlements,” a mandate that added to Israel’s deep unease over a growing international boycott.
    From Our Advertisers

    European officials tried to play down the decision, saying the guidelines merely clarified existing rules. But the move exacerbated already simmering tensions between Israel and Europe as Israeli politicians condemned it as an echo of the Holocaust-era branding of European Jews and their storefronts with yellow stars."

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/12/world/middleeast/eu-labels-israeli-settlements.html?src=me&_r=0

    Well ,then whole American will be called antisemites or who knows , might be accused of enforcing Yellow Ribbon .

    Do you deny that half the posters here are anti-Semites? I mean lets call a spade a spade. Aside from lame jokes that the definition of anti-Semite is anyone Jews don’t like. The usual real world situation (as opposed to the fantasies here) is someone doesn’t like Jews and Jews don’t like him. Meaning the hatred is mutual.

    Read More
    • Replies: @KA
    This site is anti " every race,religion,and culture"
    May be Russian Orthodox religion and Chinese political leaders fare better .
    Give an example of anti semitism with the context and the links . We can have a discussion.
    .
    , @OilcanFloyd
    Does everyone have to like and agree with Jews? There is a whole lot to dislike and oppose about organized Jewry, Jewish politics and culture and many individual Jews if you are a white American, European or a Muslim. The so-called anti-semitism that is being complained about is nothing compared to the anti-white or anti-Muslim hatred spewed daily in the media by Jews. I'd say that "anti-semitism" is often just a reaction to Jewish activism, politics and actions. It makes perfect sense to be in opposition.

    "Anti-semites" are generally pretty tame when compared to the average Jewish activist.
    , @annamaria
    "...someone doesn’t like Jews and Jews don’t like him. Meaning the hatred is mutual..."
    1. It is profitable for you to conflate Jewishness and Zionism, but this conflation does not reflect reality: people could adore Spinoza and the beauty of his mind and, at the same time, abhor the Moldovan felon Avigdor Lieberman and his racist proclamations.
    2 The alleged "beacon of democracy" in the Middle East does not have a constitution, still. Do you know why? Does this absence have something to do with recognition of the highly undesirable principle of equality before the low? By the way, Israel does not have well-defined geographical borders, for the same reason.
    3. The US' most-war-mongering think tanks are staffed with Zionists (you are free to refute this statement if you have facts). The wars that the US fought on instigation of Israel-firsters have depleted the US treasury and brought the US reputation into gutter. The Israel-firsters do not want their children to fight these wars (with a singe exception of a war maniac Ledeen): the Israel-firsters want to use the US' dime and limb to achieve the Israel's dominance in the Middle East, showing thus an exemplary behavior of a parasite using a host' body. Why then are you surprised that so many Americans hate Zionists?
    4. Jewish people live in all main cultural centers around the globe, the best of these people are ashamed of Israel's policies. Perhaps this shame is a true manifestation of Jewishness and of the noble traditions of Judaism.
    5. As a tribalist, you cannot escape the fact that any tribe includes both the best human beings and the worst. Here we are back to the faux accusation of anti-Semitism: it is proper to abhor the worst in human beings, whatever their ethnicity.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. KA [AKA "Carthage"] says:
    @Ivan
    India with 1.2 billions is a world by itself. There are countless races and religions holding the balance in a matrix of forces and co-operation. This is the way most Indians, like myself like it. It ensures for one thing that we don't get the kind of "development" that China had with its mass starvations. We have our freedoms, with no thanks to the RSS-BJP combine. The majority of Indians have a live and let live attitude, but the Hindu fascists want to target the minority Muslims and Christians in order to pursue their agenda of a neverland of Hindu purity based on partly on cow-worship. The majority of Indians, Hindu or otherwise don't buy it as can be seen from the elections in Bihar.

    “. In his Karamyog (2007), Modi writes that those castes fated to do sanitation work (clean gutters, sweep houses and cart away refuse), such as the Balmikis, do so as an “experience in spirituality.” “I do not believe that they have been doing this job just to sustain their livelihood,” says Modi, who anoints them to this despicable work because it is their “duty to work for the happiness of the entire society.” ”

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/11/on-the-wings-of-intolerance/

    It is no surprise that Modi enjoys so much following among rich Indian ,upper caste Indians and commands popularity and respects from Indian business communities . Cheap and voiceless labor are in plenty available on demand !
    But why do the poor ,indigent,and lower caste allow him or his party to get away with this racist condescending attitude?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  175. geokat62 says:
    @annamaria
    How true is this?
    "CONSPIRACY ISIS Leader ‘Al-Baghdadi’ Is A ‘Jewish Mossad Agent’ – French Reports:" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FNQ4NeTmOc

    As I mentioned in a previous comment, I’d love to get a glimpse of the Mossad’s to-do list.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Orville H. Larson
    "As I mentioned in a previous comment, I'd love to get a glimpse of the Mossad's to-do list."

    Hell, I'd love to get a glimpse of the Mossad's blackmail list. Half the U.S. Government is probably on it. . . .
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:
    @Fran Macadam
    I'm not sure it's worth engaging some of these solopsistic commenters. Their delusions - if they are not rather interlopers out to discredit legitimate critique by proximity to over the top antisemitism - are impregnable. Either way, facts will never change their habits. The only reason to post is then to engage with the original author's writing, or in extremis to act as an antidote to the smear attempts to discredit him. Maybe some naive but otherwise fair soul who might get sucked in otherwise by some of the deceptive comments will see how easily they are debunked.

    Their delusions – if they are not rather interlopers out to discredit legitimate critique by proximity to over the top antisemitism – are impregnable.

    I know exactly what you mean in your post to Sam, Fran. I think that a few of them ARE genuinely mislead but the MAJORITY of them are “interlopers out to discredit legitimate critique by proximity to over the top antisemitism” and attempting to smear Mr. Giraldi. They have no rational arguments that they can make in defense of Israel’s abhorrent actions because the truth is the truth, and so they resort to trying to turn people off to the truth by flooding his comments section with disgusting anti-Semitism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
    Precisely correct
    , @Rurik
    Hello Jr.

    I have no way of knowing if Fran is referring to moi with her indignant if curious levy of "anti-Semitism". But perusing this thread, I seem to be the one who's ruffled her delicate feathers; and if anyone has bothered to notice why she seems to be accusing me thus, it isn't because I claimed or suggested in any way that Jews in general are bad or blighted or deserving any appropriation whatsoever. No.

    What I did say is comment on her assertion that it would be somehow "more fair" if the German people were- instead of the Palestinians today- genocded out of their ancient lands (something many Jews are often known to fantasize about and even advocate for openly [see Plan, Morgenthau]) and persecuted and tormented and endlessly humiliated (even more so than they even are today) for something virtually none of them living had anything to do with whatsoever.

    That is what I said that seemingly threw her into a tizzy. ~ BTW, I like Fran's comments here and have come to respect her intelligence and humanity, but that doesn't mean that when she goes off the deep end in some crazed ethno-hate-fest that I or anyone else should be precluded from pointing out that irrational hatred of Germans is no less vile than irrational hatred of Jews, or anyone else for that matter.

    No?

    Now, is that reason enough to charge someone with the despicable charge of anti-Semitism? That they don't hate Germans with enough genocidal vigor? That they don't want to see the German people (or anyone else for that matter and especially the Palestinians who've suffered for so damn long) treated like Palestinians?!

    I didn't think so.

    And to be fair and to be honest, I did point out some of the lies we've all been marinated vis a vis WWII and the Holocaust. I did mention that much of what we've been told about the Holocaust is lies. But then so too do all respected scholars, (including Jewish scholars) agree that there were many lies indeed about the Holocaust. Lies about lampshades and lies about soap, and then the numbers at Auschwitz are quietly amended from 4 million to 1.5 million but we're all supposed to genuflect before that bullshit number of 6 million.

    But it would be silly and stupid and indeed, anti-Semitic to blame all Jews for the lies and treachery of a few. (something so obvious I shouldn't even have to point it out!) In fact I was just talking to Sam about how during war people are often treacherous and full of menace and perfidy, but do I blame the English people for the demonic crimes of its government? Of course not! So why is it that if you criticize Israel or some of the terrible things some Jews have done, that right on cue, 'boom' there it is again, that screeching that you are a crazed, blind, hate-filled anti-Semite! And solipsistic too! ; )

    Is telling the truth, (and having some fun doing it) not welcome here?. In the short time I've come to this place I've grown to like it. It's full of intelligent and eclectic people with widely ranging opinions and views. All I'm doing is trying to get a handle on things. Sometimes I put stuff out there that I'm not even sure of, and then 'bang', if I was wrong, boy oh boy do I find out right away. It's great. But then too it seems there are times when the paradigm and narrative are treated like some kind of religions dogma that you're not allowed to question. When that happens I always seem to find myself in trouble somehow.

    ~ Rurik, a natural born heretic ~
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. @Sam Shama
    P.S.: Art and RobinG

    Surely humans have a benevolent and a malevolent side. The struggle is to at least suppress the latter. In that regard I will say that among the Abrahamic religions, Christianity offers a simpler and elegant set of principles, but probably underestimates the cunning nature of the bi-pedal creature.

    The solution: I am still searching, but it must start from the individual, by recognising one's own shortcomings and working towards the common good. It should be easier today with social media etc., should it not?

    Hi Sam

    I would note Christianity is a schizophrenic religion divided between Yeshua and Saul. Never will the teaching of the two converge, they travel divergent paths. The end result is there are always ‘Christians’ on both sides of nearly every controversy; from the left to center right more those of the ‘simple and elegant’ Yeshua persuasion and on the neo-conservative right the ‘cunning bi-pedal’ of the accomplished liar Saul. But with the rise of neo-liberalism, the distinction is becoming less clear. In more or less all cases, on both sides of the divide, this schism is treated dishonestly for the collective social fear of facing a profound internal religious dissonance where one of the faith’s great teachers cannot be reconciled to the other.

    Read More
    • Agree: Sam Shama
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. @Junior

    Their delusions – if they are not rather interlopers out to discredit legitimate critique by proximity to over the top antisemitism – are impregnable.
     
    I know exactly what you mean in your post to Sam, Fran. I think that a few of them ARE genuinely mislead but the MAJORITY of them are "interlopers out to discredit legitimate critique by proximity to over the top antisemitism" and attempting to smear Mr. Giraldi. They have no rational arguments that they can make in defense of Israel's abhorrent actions because the truth is the truth, and so they resort to trying to turn people off to the truth by flooding his comments section with disgusting anti-Semitism.

    Precisely correct

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. KA says:
    @Clyde

    Well ,then whole American will be called antisemites or who knows , might be accused of enforcing Yellow Ribbon .
     
    Do you deny that half the posters here are anti-Semites? I mean lets call a spade a spade. Aside from lame jokes that the definition of anti-Semite is anyone Jews don't like. The usual real world situation (as opposed to the fantasies here) is someone doesn't like Jews and Jews don't like him. Meaning the hatred is mutual.

    This site is anti ” every race,religion,and culture”
    May be Russian Orthodox religion and Chinese political leaders fare better .
    Give an example of anti semitism with the context and the links . We can have a discussion.
    .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. @Clyde

    Well ,then whole American will be called antisemites or who knows , might be accused of enforcing Yellow Ribbon .
     
    Do you deny that half the posters here are anti-Semites? I mean lets call a spade a spade. Aside from lame jokes that the definition of anti-Semite is anyone Jews don't like. The usual real world situation (as opposed to the fantasies here) is someone doesn't like Jews and Jews don't like him. Meaning the hatred is mutual.

    Does everyone have to like and agree with Jews? There is a whole lot to dislike and oppose about organized Jewry, Jewish politics and culture and many individual Jews if you are a white American, European or a Muslim. The so-called anti-semitism that is being complained about is nothing compared to the anti-white or anti-Muslim hatred spewed daily in the media by Jews. I’d say that “anti-semitism” is often just a reaction to Jewish activism, politics and actions. It makes perfect sense to be in opposition.

    “Anti-semites” are generally pretty tame when compared to the average Jewish activist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    The so-called anti-semitism that is being complained about is nothing compared to the anti-white or anti-Muslim hatred spewed daily in the media by Jews.
     
    I was watching Bill Maher a couple days ago and he had on David Frum and Anthony Weiner and as he did a segment on a study of the numbers of a demographic of white people dying off that harken back to the post Soviet era in Russia by suicides and deaths by heroine overdoses and alcohol poisoning in America, Bill Maher was openly gloating. He said something about 'it's a bad time for whites', and then had a laugh like his whole audience hates white folks and couldn't be happier that they were dying off and killing themselves.

    They went on to speculate that part of the problem white folks were having was that they had zero clout in our society today, (at least the ones who were snuffing it in droves) and that as Maher even mentioned, because America is an oligarchy today.

    I couldn't help wonder what the reaction would have been if a white person had openly gloated on television that blacks or Jews were dying off in staggering numbers. But the very reason he was able to gloat thus is perhaps a clue as to why these white people feel so alienated. (hated and despised and made second-class citizens in their own country) But to hate white folks (and Germans in particular) is par for the course. We're all supposed to! If we don't, we're accused of being 'racists' or 'anti-Semites'
    , @Clyde
    No one has to agree with or like Jews but are half the posters here anti-Semites? I say yes. What do you say?
    Wait! Is it Jews or Zionists? Amazingly enough the most fiercely anti-Zionist here claim they have nothing against average Jews. I don't believe them! They are so pro-Muslim because they like anyone who will destroy Israel. They should make their Hajj to Mecca and make their conversion complete.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  181. Rurik says:
    @Junior

    Their delusions – if they are not rather interlopers out to discredit legitimate critique by proximity to over the top antisemitism – are impregnable.
     
    I know exactly what you mean in your post to Sam, Fran. I think that a few of them ARE genuinely mislead but the MAJORITY of them are "interlopers out to discredit legitimate critique by proximity to over the top antisemitism" and attempting to smear Mr. Giraldi. They have no rational arguments that they can make in defense of Israel's abhorrent actions because the truth is the truth, and so they resort to trying to turn people off to the truth by flooding his comments section with disgusting anti-Semitism.

    Hello Jr.

    I have no way of knowing if Fran is referring to moi with her indignant if curious levy of “anti-Semitism”. But perusing this thread, I seem to be the one who’s ruffled her delicate feathers; and if anyone has bothered to notice why she seems to be accusing me thus, it isn’t because I claimed or suggested in any way that Jews in general are bad or blighted or deserving any appropriation whatsoever. No.

    What I did say is comment on her assertion that it would be somehow “more fair” if the German people were- instead of the Palestinians today- genocded out of their ancient lands (something many Jews are often known to fantasize about and even advocate for openly [see Plan, Morgenthau]) and persecuted and tormented and endlessly humiliated (even more so than they even are today) for something virtually none of them living had anything to do with whatsoever.

    That is what I said that seemingly threw her into a tizzy. ~ BTW, I like Fran’s comments here and have come to respect her intelligence and humanity, but that doesn’t mean that when she goes off the deep end in some crazed ethno-hate-fest that I or anyone else should be precluded from pointing out that irrational hatred of Germans is no less vile than irrational hatred of Jews, or anyone else for that matter.

    No?

    Now, is that reason enough to charge someone with the despicable charge of anti-Semitism? That they don’t hate Germans with enough genocidal vigor? That they don’t want to see the German people (or anyone else for that matter and especially the Palestinians who’ve suffered for so damn long) treated like Palestinians?!

    I didn’t think so.

    And to be fair and to be honest, I did point out some of the lies we’ve all been marinated vis a vis WWII and the Holocaust. I did mention that much of what we’ve been told about the Holocaust is lies. But then so too do all respected scholars, (including Jewish scholars) agree that there were many lies indeed about the Holocaust. Lies about lampshades and lies about soap, and then the numbers at Auschwitz are quietly amended from 4 million to 1.5 million but we’re all supposed to genuflect before that bullshit number of 6 million.

    But it would be silly and stupid and indeed, anti-Semitic to blame all Jews for the lies and treachery of a few. (something so obvious I shouldn’t even have to point it out!) In fact I was just talking to Sam about how during war people are often treacherous and full of menace and perfidy, but do I blame the English people for the demonic crimes of its government? Of course not! So why is it that if you criticize Israel or some of the terrible things some Jews have done, that right on cue, ‘boom’ there it is again, that screeching that you are a crazed, blind, hate-filled anti-Semite! And solipsistic too! ; )

    Is telling the truth, (and having some fun doing it) not welcome here?. In the short time I’ve come to this place I’ve grown to like it. It’s full of intelligent and eclectic people with widely ranging opinions and views. All I’m doing is trying to get a handle on things. Sometimes I put stuff out there that I’m not even sure of, and then ‘bang’, if I was wrong, boy oh boy do I find out right away. It’s great. But then too it seems there are times when the paradigm and narrative are treated like some kind of religions dogma that you’re not allowed to question. When that happens I always seem to find myself in trouble somehow.

    ~ Rurik, a natural born heretic ~

    Read More
    • Replies: @Junior
    I was agreeing with Fran's observation in general of the reason why some commenters are anti-Semitic or pretending to be . I wasn't trying to direct it at anyone in particular. I, without a DOUBT, enjoy reading your comments, Rurik! What's funny though is that I don't even think that the comment from Fran to Sam was about one of your comments when you check the thread :)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. Rurik says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    Does everyone have to like and agree with Jews? There is a whole lot to dislike and oppose about organized Jewry, Jewish politics and culture and many individual Jews if you are a white American, European or a Muslim. The so-called anti-semitism that is being complained about is nothing compared to the anti-white or anti-Muslim hatred spewed daily in the media by Jews. I'd say that "anti-semitism" is often just a reaction to Jewish activism, politics and actions. It makes perfect sense to be in opposition.

    "Anti-semites" are generally pretty tame when compared to the average Jewish activist.

    The so-called anti-semitism that is being complained about is nothing compared to the anti-white or anti-Muslim hatred spewed daily in the media by Jews.

    I was watching Bill Maher a couple days ago and he had on David Frum and Anthony Weiner and as he did a segment on a study of the numbers of a demographic of white people dying off that harken back to the post Soviet era in Russia by suicides and deaths by heroine overdoses and alcohol poisoning in America, Bill Maher was openly gloating. He said something about ‘it’s a bad time for whites’, and then had a laugh like his whole audience hates white folks and couldn’t be happier that they were dying off and killing themselves.

    They went on to speculate that part of the problem white folks were having was that they had zero clout in our society today, (at least the ones who were snuffing it in droves) and that as Maher even mentioned, because America is an oligarchy today.

    I couldn’t help wonder what the reaction would have been if a white person had openly gloated on television that blacks or Jews were dying off in staggering numbers. But the very reason he was able to gloat thus is perhaps a clue as to why these white people feel so alienated. (hated and despised and made second-class citizens in their own country) But to hate white folks (and Germans in particular) is par for the course. We’re all supposed to! If we don’t, we’re accused of being ‘racists’ or ‘anti-Semites’

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    Bill Maher is a good example, but this has been going on for a long time. Jewish activists, comedians/comediennes, etc. have been spewing hatred in plain sight for decades. I think it's funny that so many people want to make this issue into an academic or intellectual pissing match, when all you have to do is turn on the television, walk into a movie theater, switch on the radio or open a book, magazine or newspaper and it's all right there in plain sight. Obviously the hatred and aggression is a major part of Jewish culture and religion, and it's not just a few prominent people involved.
    , @RobinG
    Rurik, you are positing something very strange here: that Maher (or any Jew, by reason of being a Jew) doesn't consider himself white. This would be an interesting research project for you. Can you find out what percentage of this O.D. cohort is Jewish?

    I don't watch Maher, but that study is well reported. The demographic is middle-aged (more or less) white males. IMO Maher's "clout" and "oligarchy" analysis is unnecessarily over-the-top. (He's just a mean little idiot who tries to make nasty people feel clever.) A better analyst observed, not that they lack 'clout', but that they need a good job. Real unemployment rates are grossly underreported. As to why Blacks and Latinos aren't showing the same spike in death rates in that age group, he speculated that it's a matter of expectations. The white males assumed they'd be able to succeed, whereas the others did not and therefore did not have the same sense of failure.

    The details of these extra deaths would also be interesting. We may assume they are blue-collar types whose jobs have been outsourced, but there are plenty of law school grads working as admins, and college grads working as baristas. Probably some Jews among them.
    , @another fred

    But to hate white folks (and Germans in particular) is par for the course.
     
    A lot of that comes from an innate human* conception of agency, i.e. if something happened, something caused it, connected to a romantic belief that life is supposed to be "good". Without a Satan on whom to place blame for the ills of the world, people just look around to find someone who seems to be in control and therefore the "agent" of all those ills.

    For some folks here that is the Jews, for others Whites, and for still others, blacks. For the Muslims, especially Shiites, the US becomes "The Great Satan".

    People have a hard time wrapping their heads around the idea that evolution is a painful, profligate process.

    * There is evidence that some other animals have a rudimentary sense of agency, which is logical if one believes that evolution is real.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. annamaria says:
    @Clyde

    Well ,then whole American will be called antisemites or who knows , might be accused of enforcing Yellow Ribbon .
     
    Do you deny that half the posters here are anti-Semites? I mean lets call a spade a spade. Aside from lame jokes that the definition of anti-Semite is anyone Jews don't like. The usual real world situation (as opposed to the fantasies here) is someone doesn't like Jews and Jews don't like him. Meaning the hatred is mutual.

    “…someone doesn’t like Jews and Jews don’t like him. Meaning the hatred is mutual…”
    1. It is profitable for you to conflate Jewishness and Zionism, but this conflation does not reflect reality: people could adore Spinoza and the beauty of his mind and, at the same time, abhor the Moldovan felon Avigdor Lieberman and his racist proclamations.
    2 The alleged “beacon of democracy” in the Middle East does not have a constitution, still. Do you know why? Does this absence have something to do with recognition of the highly undesirable principle of equality before the low? By the way, Israel does not have well-defined geographical borders, for the same reason.
    3. The US’ most-war-mongering think tanks are staffed with Zionists (you are free to refute this statement if you have facts). The wars that the US fought on instigation of Israel-firsters have depleted the US treasury and brought the US reputation into gutter. The Israel-firsters do not want their children to fight these wars (with a singe exception of a war maniac Ledeen): the Israel-firsters want to use the US’ dime and limb to achieve the Israel’s dominance in the Middle East, showing thus an exemplary behavior of a parasite using a host’ body. Why then are you surprised that so many Americans hate Zionists?
    4. Jewish people live in all main cultural centers around the globe, the best of these people are ashamed of Israel’s policies. Perhaps this shame is a true manifestation of Jewishness and of the noble traditions of Judaism.
    5. As a tribalist, you cannot escape the fact that any tribe includes both the best human beings and the worst. Here we are back to the faux accusation of anti-Semitism: it is proper to abhor the worst in human beings, whatever their ethnicity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde

    4. Jewish people live in all main cultural centers around the globe, the best of these people are ashamed of Israel’s policies. Perhaps this shame is a true manifestation of Jewishness and of the noble traditions of Judaism.
     
    Those are the communist/socialist/liberal/leftist Jews. All other Jews support Israel. You have a love affair with Islam and its false prophet. Admit it! Don't be ashamed. You are 1000% pro-Muslim because they try to destroy Israel which in your fevered mind is the source of all evil in that region. Even as Sunni and Shiite are killing each other by the thousands right now! You could care less about this slaughter. Some humanitarian you turned out to be!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. @Rurik

    The so-called anti-semitism that is being complained about is nothing compared to the anti-white or anti-Muslim hatred spewed daily in the media by Jews.
     
    I was watching Bill Maher a couple days ago and he had on David Frum and Anthony Weiner and as he did a segment on a study of the numbers of a demographic of white people dying off that harken back to the post Soviet era in Russia by suicides and deaths by heroine overdoses and alcohol poisoning in America, Bill Maher was openly gloating. He said something about 'it's a bad time for whites', and then had a laugh like his whole audience hates white folks and couldn't be happier that they were dying off and killing themselves.

    They went on to speculate that part of the problem white folks were having was that they had zero clout in our society today, (at least the ones who were snuffing it in droves) and that as Maher even mentioned, because America is an oligarchy today.

    I couldn't help wonder what the reaction would have been if a white person had openly gloated on television that blacks or Jews were dying off in staggering numbers. But the very reason he was able to gloat thus is perhaps a clue as to why these white people feel so alienated. (hated and despised and made second-class citizens in their own country) But to hate white folks (and Germans in particular) is par for the course. We're all supposed to! If we don't, we're accused of being 'racists' or 'anti-Semites'

    Bill Maher is a good example, but this has been going on for a long time. Jewish activists, comedians/comediennes, etc. have been spewing hatred in plain sight for decades. I think it’s funny that so many people want to make this issue into an academic or intellectual pissing match, when all you have to do is turn on the television, walk into a movie theater, switch on the radio or open a book, magazine or newspaper and it’s all right there in plain sight. Obviously the hatred and aggression is a major part of Jewish culture and religion, and it’s not just a few prominent people involved.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. Rurik says:

    Beautifully said annamarina !

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  186. Clyde says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    Does everyone have to like and agree with Jews? There is a whole lot to dislike and oppose about organized Jewry, Jewish politics and culture and many individual Jews if you are a white American, European or a Muslim. The so-called anti-semitism that is being complained about is nothing compared to the anti-white or anti-Muslim hatred spewed daily in the media by Jews. I'd say that "anti-semitism" is often just a reaction to Jewish activism, politics and actions. It makes perfect sense to be in opposition.

    "Anti-semites" are generally pretty tame when compared to the average Jewish activist.

    No one has to agree with or like Jews but are half the posters here anti-Semites? I say yes. What do you say?
    Wait! Is it Jews or Zionists? Amazingly enough the most fiercely anti-Zionist here claim they have nothing against average Jews. I don’t believe them! They are so pro-Muslim because they like anyone who will destroy Israel. They should make their Hajj to Mecca and make their conversion complete.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    "No one has to agree with or like Jews but are half the posters here anti-Semites? I say yes. What do you say?"

    I don't care. Why should I? Jews aren't exactly famous for calling out or examining their own hate-mongers and sinners. I'd even say that when zionist and anti-zionist Jews fight, it mostly over who is the bigger threat to Jewish power or cohesiveness, rather than over the wrongs of either group.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. Clyde says:
    @annamaria
    "...someone doesn’t like Jews and Jews don’t like him. Meaning the hatred is mutual..."
    1. It is profitable for you to conflate Jewishness and Zionism, but this conflation does not reflect reality: people could adore Spinoza and the beauty of his mind and, at the same time, abhor the Moldovan felon Avigdor Lieberman and his racist proclamations.
    2 The alleged "beacon of democracy" in the Middle East does not have a constitution, still. Do you know why? Does this absence have something to do with recognition of the highly undesirable principle of equality before the low? By the way, Israel does not have well-defined geographical borders, for the same reason.
    3. The US' most-war-mongering think tanks are staffed with Zionists (you are free to refute this statement if you have facts). The wars that the US fought on instigation of Israel-firsters have depleted the US treasury and brought the US reputation into gutter. The Israel-firsters do not want their children to fight these wars (with a singe exception of a war maniac Ledeen): the Israel-firsters want to use the US' dime and limb to achieve the Israel's dominance in the Middle East, showing thus an exemplary behavior of a parasite using a host' body. Why then are you surprised that so many Americans hate Zionists?
    4. Jewish people live in all main cultural centers around the globe, the best of these people are ashamed of Israel's policies. Perhaps this shame is a true manifestation of Jewishness and of the noble traditions of Judaism.
    5. As a tribalist, you cannot escape the fact that any tribe includes both the best human beings and the worst. Here we are back to the faux accusation of anti-Semitism: it is proper to abhor the worst in human beings, whatever their ethnicity.

    4. Jewish people live in all main cultural centers around the globe, the best of these people are ashamed of Israel’s policies. Perhaps this shame is a true manifestation of Jewishness and of the noble traditions of Judaism.

    Those are the communist/socialist/liberal/leftist Jews. All other Jews support Israel. You have a love affair with Islam and its false prophet. Admit it! Don’t be ashamed. You are 1000% pro-Muslim because they try to destroy Israel which in your fevered mind is the source of all evil in that region. Even as Sunni and Shiite are killing each other by the thousands right now! You could care less about this slaughter. Some humanitarian you turned out to be!

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    "...the communist/socialist/liberal/leftist Jews. All other Jews support Israel."
    "You are 1000% pro-Muslim because they try to destroy Israel..."

    May I suggest that you are a hasbarist-troll on the Unz Review comment site?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  188. RobinG says:
    @Rurik

    The so-called anti-semitism that is being complained about is nothing compared to the anti-white or anti-Muslim hatred spewed daily in the media by Jews.
     
    I was watching Bill Maher a couple days ago and he had on David Frum and Anthony Weiner and as he did a segment on a study of the numbers of a demographic of white people dying off that harken back to the post Soviet era in Russia by suicides and deaths by heroine overdoses and alcohol poisoning in America, Bill Maher was openly gloating. He said something about 'it's a bad time for whites', and then had a laugh like his whole audience hates white folks and couldn't be happier that they were dying off and killing themselves.

    They went on to speculate that part of the problem white folks were having was that they had zero clout in our society today, (at least the ones who were snuffing it in droves) and that as Maher even mentioned, because America is an oligarchy today.

    I couldn't help wonder what the reaction would have been if a white person had openly gloated on television that blacks or Jews were dying off in staggering numbers. But the very reason he was able to gloat thus is perhaps a clue as to why these white people feel so alienated. (hated and despised and made second-class citizens in their own country) But to hate white folks (and Germans in particular) is par for the course. We're all supposed to! If we don't, we're accused of being 'racists' or 'anti-Semites'

    Rurik, you are positing something very strange here: that Maher (or any Jew, by reason of being a Jew) doesn’t consider himself white. This would be an interesting research project for you. Can you find out what percentage of this O.D. cohort is Jewish?

    I don’t watch Maher, but that study is well reported. The demographic is middle-aged (more or less) white males. IMO Maher’s “clout” and “oligarchy” analysis is unnecessarily over-the-top. (He’s just a mean little idiot who tries to make nasty people feel clever.) A better analyst observed, not that they lack ‘clout’, but that they need a good job. Real unemployment rates are grossly underreported. As to why Blacks and Latinos aren’t showing the same spike in death rates in that age group, he speculated that it’s a matter of expectations. The white males assumed they’d be able to succeed, whereas the others did not and therefore did not have the same sense of failure.

    The details of these extra deaths would also be interesting. We may assume they are blue-collar types whose jobs have been outsourced, but there are plenty of law school grads working as admins, and college grads working as baristas. Probably some Jews among them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nannerglans
    I'm presently employed by a division of an extremely large corporation that does work primarily for the railroad industry. (We have a few other customers-utilities, pipeline companies, and as unlikely as it sounds dog racing tracks-but it's 95% rail.) I frequently visit rail facilities and interact with union craft railroaders quite a bit. Most of those jobs require only a high school or GED education, but I am no longer surprised when I find out that Fred the carman or Donna the clerk has a master's, professional, or Ph.D. degree. I'd say more than a quarter have at least a bachelor's degree and so far I have met just about everything but an actual M.D. I have met CPAs, lawyers, engineers, airline pilots, IT people in some profusion, former clergymen, you name it.

    Some are there because of personal or professional problems in their former careers but most because they figure it's less work for the same or more money. Most say that no amount of money would lure them off the yard.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  189. @Clyde
    No one has to agree with or like Jews but are half the posters here anti-Semites? I say yes. What do you say?
    Wait! Is it Jews or Zionists? Amazingly enough the most fiercely anti-Zionist here claim they have nothing against average Jews. I don't believe them! They are so pro-Muslim because they like anyone who will destroy Israel. They should make their Hajj to Mecca and make their conversion complete.

    “No one has to agree with or like Jews but are half the posters here anti-Semites? I say yes. What do you say?”

    I don’t care. Why should I? Jews aren’t exactly famous for calling out or examining their own hate-mongers and sinners. I’d even say that when zionist and anti-zionist Jews fight, it mostly over who is the bigger threat to Jewish power or cohesiveness, rather than over the wrongs of either group.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG

    You said, " I’d even say that when zionist and anti-zionist Jews fight, it mostly over who is the bigger threat to Jewish power or cohesiveness, rather than over the wrongs of either group."
     
    Yes, that's why some people refer to the Jewish left as anti-Zionist Zionists. And hence the big flap over Alison Weir, and whether JVP and US Campaign are gatekeepers that prevent meaningful progress re. Palestine. This, of course, is debatable, but the chokehold that the Israel Lobby has on US politics is not.

    Awareness is growing. There's a new book out --
    Congress and the Shaping of the Middle East
    http://www.amazon.com/Congress-Shaping-Middle-East-Beattie/dp/1609805615/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8
    , @Clyde

    Jews aren’t exactly famous for calling out or examining their own hate-mongers and sinners.
     
    The same applies to the Muslim world or is it only Jews that you apply your genius level analytical skills to?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. @geokat62
    As I mentioned in a previous comment, I'd love to get a glimpse of the Mossad's to-do list.

    “As I mentioned in a previous comment, I’d love to get a glimpse of the Mossad’s to-do list.”

    Hell, I’d love to get a glimpse of the Mossad’s blackmail list. Half the U.S. Government is probably on it. . . .

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    Sadly, this conjecture is most likely true...
    , @Avery
    {Hell, I’d love to get a glimpse of the Mossad’s blackmail list. Half the U.S. Government is probably on it. . . .}

    There are apparently lots of US Congress blackmail lists.
    Maybe names on blackmail lists are being sold or exchanged between parties.

    Years ago former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds was saying that former Speaker Hastert was being blackmailed. She didn't say by whom. But this year it came out, when Hastert was nailed for lying about suspicious large cash withdrawals.

    Apparently he was paying off one of his victims for many years.
    Hastert was sexually victimizing male students when he was coach at some high school.
    Apparently Turks found out about it - or bought the info from some other party, most likely Israelis - and blackmailed him into going along with their denialist agenda. Apparently there was also a payoff of $500K.

    Hastert pleaded guilty to some federal financial crime: so there will be no public trial. All the years of him prostituting himself for some foreign government(s), while on the payroll of US taxpayers, gets buried.

    How convenient.

    Anyone remember Senator Larry Craig ? the one who was arrested for soliciting a male prostitute in a public restroom.
    US Congress must be full of weirdos, who are hiding something and are being blackmailed.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  191. RobinG says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    "No one has to agree with or like Jews but are half the posters here anti-Semites? I say yes. What do you say?"

    I don't care. Why should I? Jews aren't exactly famous for calling out or examining their own hate-mongers and sinners. I'd even say that when zionist and anti-zionist Jews fight, it mostly over who is the bigger threat to Jewish power or cohesiveness, rather than over the wrongs of either group.

    You said, ” I’d even say that when zionist and anti-zionist Jews fight, it mostly over who is the bigger threat to Jewish power or cohesiveness, rather than over the wrongs of either group.”

    Yes, that’s why some people refer to the Jewish left as anti-Zionist Zionists. And hence the big flap over Alison Weir, and whether JVP and US Campaign are gatekeepers that prevent meaningful progress re. Palestine. This, of course, is debatable, but the chokehold that the Israel Lobby has on US politics is not.

    Awareness is growing. There’s a new book out –
    Congress and the Shaping of the Middle East

    http://www.amazon.com/Congress-Shaping-Middle-East-Beattie/dp/1609805615/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde

    This, of course, is debatable, but the chokehold that the Israel Lobby has on US politics is not.
     
    Some chokehold. Obama and the half-Jew by blood John Kerry*** screwed Israel to the wall on Iran. AIPAC that you revile all the time got zero traction with the commie-Obama regime and not enough traction in Congress to stop anything. So much for those all powerful Zionist mind rays that make your shabbos goys dance to Hava Nagilla like a Zionist organ grinder's monkey.
    Your tunnel vision keeps you from seeing this.

    ***Two of John Kerry's grandparents were born Jewish which made you Jewish enough for the Germans to send you to the concentration camps during WW2.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. Clyde says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    "No one has to agree with or like Jews but are half the posters here anti-Semites? I say yes. What do you say?"

    I don't care. Why should I? Jews aren't exactly famous for calling out or examining their own hate-mongers and sinners. I'd even say that when zionist and anti-zionist Jews fight, it mostly over who is the bigger threat to Jewish power or cohesiveness, rather than over the wrongs of either group.

    Jews aren’t exactly famous for calling out or examining their own hate-mongers and sinners.

    The same applies to the Muslim world or is it only Jews that you apply your genius level analytical skills to?

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    @Clyde

    Who said Muslims are big on self/group criticism? I didn't. We know that whites are more than capable of self or group criticism. The issue is Jews, and it's pretty obvious that they are very tribal, for the most part. Muslims have very little voice or power in the West, and whites who confront Jewish power don't have the same platform as even minor Jewish personalities in the media. Phil Giraldi would never be given major media time to offer his reasonable and mild views, yet I constantly see Jewish SJWs given airtime to bash whites, Christians, Muslims, the West, or to vent whatever other hatreds or bigotries they hold. One doesn't have to be a genius or have great analytical skills to see the obvious.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. Clyde says:
    @RobinG

    You said, " I’d even say that when zionist and anti-zionist Jews fight, it mostly over who is the bigger threat to Jewish power or cohesiveness, rather than over the wrongs of either group."
     
    Yes, that's why some people refer to the Jewish left as anti-Zionist Zionists. And hence the big flap over Alison Weir, and whether JVP and US Campaign are gatekeepers that prevent meaningful progress re. Palestine. This, of course, is debatable, but the chokehold that the Israel Lobby has on US politics is not.

    Awareness is growing. There's a new book out --
    Congress and the Shaping of the Middle East
    http://www.amazon.com/Congress-Shaping-Middle-East-Beattie/dp/1609805615/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8

    This, of course, is debatable, but the chokehold that the Israel Lobby has on US politics is not.

    Some chokehold. Obama and the half-Jew by blood John Kerry*** screwed Israel to the wall on Iran. AIPAC that you revile all the time got zero traction with the commie-Obama regime and not enough traction in Congress to stop anything. So much for those all powerful Zionist mind rays that make your shabbos goys dance to Hava Nagilla like a Zionist organ grinder’s monkey.
    Your tunnel vision keeps you from seeing this.

    ***Two of John Kerry’s grandparents were born Jewish which made you Jewish enough for the Germans to send you to the concentration camps during WW2.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    Thank you for outing yourself unequivocally. As Annamarina said, "..you are a hasbarist-troll.." (Unless you're just pathetically brainwashed.)

    There never was an Iranian nuclear threat, so no selling out. For playing along with the Mossad's planted lap-tops the US now gets to gift Israel an additional 20 Billion (up form 30B to 50B) over the next 10 years, plus all kinds of weapons in addition.

    Phil's review of "Manufactured Crisis"-
    http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2014/03/31/targeting-iran-2/
    "I am going to explain why Gareth Porter’s new book Manufactured Crisis: the Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare is possibly the most important expose of political corruption and government malfeasance to appear in the past ten years. ...the US and Israeli governments both knew that the entire process was completely bogus and that Iran had no nuclear weapons program.."
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. annamaria says:
    @Clyde

    4. Jewish people live in all main cultural centers around the globe, the best of these people are ashamed of Israel’s policies. Perhaps this shame is a true manifestation of Jewishness and of the noble traditions of Judaism.
     
    Those are the communist/socialist/liberal/leftist Jews. All other Jews support Israel. You have a love affair with Islam and its false prophet. Admit it! Don't be ashamed. You are 1000% pro-Muslim because they try to destroy Israel which in your fevered mind is the source of all evil in that region. Even as Sunni and Shiite are killing each other by the thousands right now! You could care less about this slaughter. Some humanitarian you turned out to be!

    “…the communist/socialist/liberal/leftist Jews. All other Jews support Israel.”
    “You are 1000% pro-Muslim because they try to destroy Israel…”

    May I suggest that you are a hasbarist-troll on the Unz Review comment site?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde
    Why not admit you will support any Muslims who want to destroy Israel? Wear it proudly! Go wear it in France where the Jihadist cause that you want to destroy Israel is destroying Paris first. 150 dead so far and the maimed might be maimed for life. Missing a leg, an arm, a kidney and so on. Same as many were maimed by the Muslim mini-Jihad at the Boston Marathon a few years ago. To my memory five people lost a leg.
    , @Clyde
    My take is the Israelis are paying you to make the Iranians and other Muslim Jihadists look bad via your fanatical posts. I must admit its a clever form of hasbara. Are you allowed to tell me how much the Likud party pay you for this? Also what's the inside scoop on Benjamin Netanyahu? Does he really think Obama is a gay crypto-Muslim?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. annamaria says:
    @Orville H. Larson
    "As I mentioned in a previous comment, I'd love to get a glimpse of the Mossad's to-do list."

    Hell, I'd love to get a glimpse of the Mossad's blackmail list. Half the U.S. Government is probably on it. . . .

    Sadly, this conjecture is most likely true…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  196. @Clyde

    Jews aren’t exactly famous for calling out or examining their own hate-mongers and sinners.
     
    The same applies to the Muslim world or is it only Jews that you apply your genius level analytical skills to?

    Who said Muslims are big on self/group criticism? I didn’t. We know that whites are more than capable of self or group criticism. The issue is Jews, and it’s pretty obvious that they are very tribal, for the most part. Muslims have very little voice or power in the West, and whites who confront Jewish power don’t have the same platform as even minor Jewish personalities in the media. Phil Giraldi would never be given major media time to offer his reasonable and mild views, yet I constantly see Jewish SJWs given airtime to bash whites, Christians, Muslims, the West, or to vent whatever other hatreds or bigotries they hold. One doesn’t have to be a genius or have great analytical skills to see the obvious.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  197. RobinG says:
    @Clyde

    This, of course, is debatable, but the chokehold that the Israel Lobby has on US politics is not.
     
    Some chokehold. Obama and the half-Jew by blood John Kerry*** screwed Israel to the wall on Iran. AIPAC that you revile all the time got zero traction with the commie-Obama regime and not enough traction in Congress to stop anything. So much for those all powerful Zionist mind rays that make your shabbos goys dance to Hava Nagilla like a Zionist organ grinder's monkey.
    Your tunnel vision keeps you from seeing this.

    ***Two of John Kerry's grandparents were born Jewish which made you Jewish enough for the Germans to send you to the concentration camps during WW2.

    Thank you for outing yourself unequivocally. As Annamarina said, “..you are a hasbarist-troll..” (Unless you’re just pathetically brainwashed.)

    There never was an Iranian nuclear threat, so no selling out. For playing along with the Mossad’s planted lap-tops the US now gets to gift Israel an additional 20 Billion (up form 30B to 50B) over the next 10 years, plus all kinds of weapons in addition.

    Phil’s review of “Manufactured Crisis”-

    http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2014/03/31/targeting-iran-2/

    “I am going to explain why Gareth Porter’s new book Manufactured Crisis: the Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare is possibly the most important expose of political corruption and government malfeasance to appear in the past ten years. …the US and Israeli governments both knew that the entire process was completely bogus and that Iran had no nuclear weapons program..”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde
    I am not a hasbarist and The Israelis don't pay me you fool! There is more chance of the Iranians paying you. Wake up, there is a bigger world out there/ The Muslims you cater to went on Jihad in Paris last night killing 150. So wake up dudeski! Snap out of it!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  198. Avery says:
    @Orville H. Larson
    "As I mentioned in a previous comment, I'd love to get a glimpse of the Mossad's to-do list."

    Hell, I'd love to get a glimpse of the Mossad's blackmail list. Half the U.S. Government is probably on it. . . .

    {Hell, I’d love to get a glimpse of the Mossad’s blackmail list. Half the U.S. Government is probably on it. . . .}

    There are apparently lots of US Congress blackmail lists.
    Maybe names on blackmail lists are being sold or exchanged between parties.

    Years ago former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds was saying that former Speaker Hastert was being blackmailed. She didn’t say by whom. But this year it came out, when Hastert was nailed for lying about suspicious large cash withdrawals.

    Apparently he was paying off one of his victims for many years.
    Hastert was sexually victimizing male students when he was coach at some high school.
    Apparently Turks found out about it – or bought the info from some other party, most likely Israelis – and blackmailed him into going along with their denialist agenda. Apparently there was also a payoff of $500K.

    Hastert pleaded guilty to some federal financial crime: so there will be no public trial. All the years of him prostituting himself for some foreign government(s), while on the payroll of US taxpayers, gets buried.

    How convenient.

    Anyone remember Senator Larry Craig ? the one who was arrested for soliciting a male prostitute in a public restroom.
    US Congress must be full of weirdos, who are hiding something and are being blackmailed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Fran Macadam
    One of the very practical purposes for a mass surveillance system that stores everything recorded for use by posterity. Should anyone show importance, they can be investigated and if anything at all is found, turned to advantage. It works whether it's deployed against enemy foreigners, or allied opponents or even loyal citizens. The object is dominance and control. The technological imperative in our age, where there is a deep state, as Phil's recent presentation at Georgetown showed, and where secret legal memos justify anything, is that there is no more moral restraint beyond "what can be done, will be done."

    One of the interesting aspects I would have liked to have brought out had I been able to be present at that session with Bill Lind and Phil, is to ask about the transnational aspect of the Deep State, as evidenced by the integration of the democratically unaccountable Five Eyes Anglo agencies, which seem to have a greater loyalty and accountability to each other than to their respective public facing governments. The recent statements by British military leaders that they would never allow a democratically elected Corbyn government to take power means their loyalty lies elsewhere. Where?
    , @geokat62

    Apparently Turks found out about it – or bought the info from some other party, most likely Israelis – and blackmailed him into going along with their denialist agenda.
     
    This is how the game is played: through the power of The Lobby, the USG has entered into an MOU with the Zionist state to “share” signal intelligence that is collected on all US citizens. And to mitigate against the risk of blackmail, the MOU stipulates that should the Israelis come across information on high level USG officials, they will immediately destroy it. Ever wonder why some congress people – Lindsey Graham, John McCain, Dennis Hastert, Jan Schakowsky, etc. – are passionate defenders of the Zionist state?… now you know.
    , @Orville H. Larson
    " . . . US Congress must be full of weirdos, who are hiding something and are being blackmailed."

    Could be. In any case, they're bought-and-paid-for hacks.

    You may be sure that the Mossad avidly collects dirt on the members of the Parliament of Whores. In case they deviate from the we-love-Israel script, the Mossad can yank their leash--hard.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  199. @Avery
    {Hell, I’d love to get a glimpse of the Mossad’s blackmail list. Half the U.S. Government is probably on it. . . .}

    There are apparently lots of US Congress blackmail lists.
    Maybe names on blackmail lists are being sold or exchanged between parties.

    Years ago former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds was saying that former Speaker Hastert was being blackmailed. She didn't say by whom. But this year it came out, when Hastert was nailed for lying about suspicious large cash withdrawals.

    Apparently he was paying off one of his victims for many years.
    Hastert was sexually victimizing male students when he was coach at some high school.
    Apparently Turks found out about it - or bought the info from some other party, most likely Israelis - and blackmailed him into going along with their denialist agenda. Apparently there was also a payoff of $500K.

    Hastert pleaded guilty to some federal financial crime: so there will be no public trial. All the years of him prostituting himself for some foreign government(s), while on the payroll of US taxpayers, gets buried.

    How convenient.

    Anyone remember Senator Larry Craig ? the one who was arrested for soliciting a male prostitute in a public restroom.
    US Congress must be full of weirdos, who are hiding something and are being blackmailed.

    One of the very practical purposes for a mass surveillance system that stores everything recorded for use by posterity. Should anyone show importance, they can be investigated and if anything at all is found, turned to advantage. It works whether it’s deployed against enemy foreigners, or allied opponents or even loyal citizens. The object is dominance and control. The technological imperative in our age, where there is a deep state, as Phil’s recent presentation at Georgetown showed, and where secret legal memos justify anything, is that there is no more moral restraint beyond “what can be done, will be done.”

    One of the interesting aspects I would have liked to have brought out had I been able to be present at that session with Bill Lind and Phil, is to ask about the transnational aspect of the Deep State, as evidenced by the integration of the democratically unaccountable Five Eyes Anglo agencies, which seem to have a greater loyalty and accountability to each other than to their respective public facing governments. The recent statements by British military leaders that they would never allow a democratically elected Corbyn government to take power means their loyalty lies elsewhere. Where?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {The recent statements by British military leaders that they would never allow a democratically elected Corbyn government to take power means their loyalty lies elsewhere. Where?}

    Don't know where their loyalties lie, but glad you brought up the British military leaders publicly affirming that the charade the Anglo-American imperial nannies have been foisting on the weak and defenseless of the world to justify their invasions and meddling - "Democracy" - is a colossal fraud.

    The security apparatus in the supposed "Law & Order", "Magna Carta", "Democracy", "Liberty", etc, etc UK will veto or overthrow any democratically elected government that they - and only they - consider "unacceptable": no different that any other dictatorships that the A-A Imperialists have "regime changed" to bring 'liberty' and 'democracy' to the benighted Hoi Polloi.

    The dirty tricks of the real rulers of UK is nothing new.
    People who are interested can look up the saga of PM Harold Wilson: MI5 mounted a full-on campaign to discredit him by dirty tricks, lies, innuendo, ....and have him overthrown. This was about 40 years ago.

    , @Art

    The technological imperative in our age, where there is a deep state, as Phil’s recent presentation at Georgetown showed, and where secret legal memos justify anything, is that there is no more moral restraint beyond “what can be done, will be done.”
     
    Well stated - how true - thanks.
    , @RobinG
    Do you mean this at GW ?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipWqr1Vnyj4
    The State and Modern War
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  200. Druid says:
    @Clyde

    Nazrallah is the shrewdest, most courageous, and (not incidentally) most successful leader in the Near East.
     
    If he's so smart how come his people walk around in rags same as before there ever was an Israel? All he offers them is war to take their minds off their hungry bellies and their children needing medicines. Allah is a war god. He is bored by peace so the Shiites will duke it out with the Sunnis when there is no one else around around. Now a days we have Alewites (semi-Shiite) fighting Sunni ISIS. Iran funds the Alewite regime and Gulf states fund ISIS. Everyone pitches in to back their favorite. It's much more interesting to the Islamic world this way, when they have skin in the game.
    Same way you might place a bet on a football game to make it more interesting.

    You revel in ignorance!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  201. Art says:
    @Sam Shama
    P.S.: Art and RobinG

    Surely humans have a benevolent and a malevolent side. The struggle is to at least suppress the latter. In that regard I will say that among the Abrahamic religions, Christianity offers a simpler and elegant set of principles, but probably underestimates the cunning nature of the bi-pedal creature.

    The solution: I am still searching, but it must start from the individual, by recognising one's own shortcomings and working towards the common good. It should be easier today with social media etc., should it not?

    Surely humans have a benevolent and a malevolent side. The struggle is to at least suppress the latter.

    Sam,

    Good is not the absence of bad – good has to be created – good is a product of actual work. Good can only happen when effort is expended.

    Our time is limited. Time spent suppressing bad is wasted time – it is not time spent working on good. On a plus minus scale – suppressing bad only gets you back to zero. It does not produce the good things that we need to sustain ourselves.

    The answer to bad people is to have nothing to do with them – to ostracize them – thus freeing one’s self for creative work that does good life extending things.

    Art

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    Agree. Which is why I said ' ....at least suppress the latter'
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  202. Avery says:
    @Fran Macadam
    One of the very practical purposes for a mass surveillance system that stores everything recorded for use by posterity. Should anyone show importance, they can be investigated and if anything at all is found, turned to advantage. It works whether it's deployed against enemy foreigners, or allied opponents or even loyal citizens. The object is dominance and control. The technological imperative in our age, where there is a deep state, as Phil's recent presentation at Georgetown showed, and where secret legal memos justify anything, is that there is no more moral restraint beyond "what can be done, will be done."

    One of the interesting aspects I would have liked to have brought out had I been able to be present at that session with Bill Lind and Phil, is to ask about the transnational aspect of the Deep State, as evidenced by the integration of the democratically unaccountable Five Eyes Anglo agencies, which seem to have a greater loyalty and accountability to each other than to their respective public facing governments. The recent statements by British military leaders that they would never allow a democratically elected Corbyn government to take power means their loyalty lies elsewhere. Where?

    {The recent statements by British military leaders that they would never allow a democratically elected Corbyn government to take power means their loyalty lies elsewhere. Where?}

    Don’t know where their loyalties lie, but glad you brought up the British military leaders publicly affirming that the charade the Anglo-American imperial nannies have been foisting on the weak and defenseless of the world to justify their invasions and meddling – “Democracy” – is a colossal fraud.

    The security apparatus in the supposed “Law & Order”, “Magna Carta”, “Democracy”, “Liberty”, etc, etc UK will veto or overthrow any democratically elected government that they – and only they – consider “unacceptable”: no different that any other dictatorships that the A-A Imperialists have “regime changed” to bring ‘liberty’ and ‘democracy’ to the benighted Hoi Polloi.

    The dirty tricks of the real rulers of UK is nothing new.
    People who are interested can look up the saga of PM Harold Wilson: MI5 mounted a full-on campaign to discredit him by dirty tricks, lies, innuendo, ….and have him overthrown. This was about 40 years ago.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nannerglans
    One, most non-white peoples don't even want "democracy", and two, when they do get it and then vote in a way the white powers don't like, they know they will be overruled anyway.

    Almost all Arabs want the Jews out of Palestine, but if they all vote for that, is it going to change anything? Of course not.

    Any normal person will resent being involved in something they see as a humiliating sham.

    When I was in junior high, two kids got hit by cars coming out of a blind exit on the side of the building. (None were killed or maimed, but one lost a couple of teeth, and one had a broken arm.) The students petitioned the principal to have a stop sign and a line put on the exit. A student council kid asked for an assembly. The principal held one-and the students were told that it was the student's fault and that nothing would be done, and said "Anyone who wants to talk about this can come to my office, and we'll talk about five seconds, and they will be suspended and their parents can explain it to them." (In those days, in our town, parents all backed the administration pretty much one hundred percent. It was the good old days there, even if it was the Disco Era out East.)

    Most of us in that assembly never voted in any sort of student council or other such election as long as we attended that school. I never did. We never said a word, we just didn't participate in elections.

    Years later, I worked in a manufacturing plant where the management had a similar attitude. They always asked us what we thought or if we had any ideas to improve things. At first, people participated, but after every proposed idea was ignored at best and occasionally ridiculed, we decided we were not playing any more. No one would be seen within fifteen feet of the "Suggestion Box", and at "team meetings", quiet was the rule.

    Seen in that light, the failure of "bringing democracy" to the Middle East, or everyplace else it has failed, makes perfect sense.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  203. Art says:
    @Fran Macadam
    One of the very practical purposes for a mass surveillance system that stores everything recorded for use by posterity. Should anyone show importance, they can be investigated and if anything at all is found, turned to advantage. It works whether it's deployed against enemy foreigners, or allied opponents or even loyal citizens. The object is dominance and control. The technological imperative in our age, where there is a deep state, as Phil's recent presentation at Georgetown showed, and where secret legal memos justify anything, is that there is no more moral restraint beyond "what can be done, will be done."

    One of the interesting aspects I would have liked to have brought out had I been able to be present at that session with Bill Lind and Phil, is to ask about the transnational aspect of the Deep State, as evidenced by the integration of the democratically unaccountable Five Eyes Anglo agencies, which seem to have a greater loyalty and accountability to each other than to their respective public facing governments. The recent statements by British military leaders that they would never allow a democratically elected Corbyn government to take power means their loyalty lies elsewhere. Where?

    The technological imperative in our age, where there is a deep state, as Phil’s recent presentation at Georgetown showed, and where secret legal memos justify anything, is that there is no more moral restraint beyond “what can be done, will be done.”

    Well stated – how true – thanks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  204. Sam Shama says:
    @Rurik

    acknowledging Fran’s advise to limit discussion
     
    well Fran plays fast and loose with acusations of 'anti-Semitism', but for the record, I never said anything about Jews deserving to suffer. What I did say was that it's wrong to want to see any innocent people suffer, even innocent Germans (if you believe there is such a thing) or anyone else for that matter- for things they had no part of. If that makes me an anti-Semite, then so be it

    No one is pooh-poohing diplomacy Sam. What is salient is the use of treachery and ignoble betrayal to achieve one's nefarious goals, like tricking your foe into laying down his arms in a gesture of mutual diplomatic respect in a sort of white flag treaty, only to betray that diplomacy and attack you opponent once he's disarmed- and then starve him into selling his progeny into slavery. Diplomacy is one thing, but the Brits were all too well known for duplicity and sticking knives into backs. Nothing to be proud of, even if you were 'victorious'.

    As for value judgments, there are times in history when they should be made. Cruelty for its own sake, dishonesty, treachery as I've mentioned and genocide are a short list that to my mind are things that are reprehensible and vile sins that stain the fabric of your character, whether individual or national, even when it's done to "win".

    To this day people like Benedict Arnold, Quisling, Stalin, Judas and most recently Merkel are names that will live in infamy as name/words that describe a type of person that you don't want to be. Justifiably and universally reviled, they are examples of the human condition at its worst. Moral relativism is the refuge of the scoundrel, and history can and should be a harsh judge. At least in my humble opinion. ; )

    What is salient is the use of treachery and ignoble betrayal to achieve one’s nefarious goals, like tricking your foe into laying down his arms in a gesture of mutual diplomatic respect in a sort of white flag treaty, only to betray that diplomacy and attack you opponent once he’s disarmed- and then starve him into selling his progeny into slavery.

    Rurik,
    Its been a long day at work.

    You have used a number of charged terms: ‘nefarious’, ‘ignoble’, ‘white flag treaty’ among others. One should use those terms under careful advisement.

    Once again I will strive to keep this short in the interest of limiting the discussion of off-topic threads.

    I question your use of Freedman’s version of of the proceedings for the war period 1914-1919, by noting that his was a flawed version, not just in the factual accounting of events but more so in its failure to clearly distinguish responsibilities of various parties, including Zionist leaders who showed up in numbers at Versailles to secure a promise made to them by the British.

    We are not imposing value judgements at this juncture; but we can, and will in due course.

    First, other than a few, short and sharp German successes in early 1914, the War was very much in stalemate through 1917. It was the Allied Spring offensive of 1918 followed by the Summer, including the U.S., by that time,which sealed Germany’s fate and they sued for an armistice; they could have carried on, much like the exhausted Brits, just prior to Spring 1918, but they did not, did they? [ American zionists as American citizens lobbied successfully to procure American participation, and that was the clinching factor, but it is hardly the principal reason why America went to war; it saw great commercial and Industrial opportunity in an expectedly defeated postwar Germany] So the Germans lost, signed an armistice and the victorious allies continued to exact punishment on the German population until they saw their way clear to go to Versailles. If that is what you call ‘ignoble’, you would be wrong, since Germany would have done precisely the same, as they had amply demonstrated in previous wars with Russia and France.

    This was war.

    What was the treachery? On the part of which German Jew?

    Walther Rathenau whose name Freedman bandies carelessly in that screed, was a loyal German citizen who built one of the most successful German companies, AEG, and helped Germany during the blockade to manage its dwindling resources, was beseeched by the republic to be its Foreign Minister. He did accept that responsibility and shepherded Germany through the Treaty of Rapallo with the nascent Soviet Union and Versailles, only to be assassinated by the extreme Right. The Right in Germany [including the military leadership corps] conveniently and absurdly blamed the Jews for their own failure to win the Spring Offensive, and precipitated Rathenau’s assassination. Many years later Rathenau’s assassin [one of them I think] saw the mistake of his actions [especially after he received a letter from Rathenau's mother forgiving him] and condemned the Nazis, stating something along the lines of ‘It is your philosophy that brought ruin to Germany in the past!’

    So who are you calling a traitor? Weizmann? Jabotinsky? Arlozoroff? None of these men were German and owed no allegiance to Germany! They correctly backed the winner and demanded that the victor honour their pledge in the form of the Balfour Declaration.

    That is about the long of it.

    Now we can come to the value judgements. There are a few, and I choose only to highlight one: British support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, even with its cryptic protections extended to native populations, was tenuous at best. Palestine was not their’s to carve. But such has always been the game of the Great Powers.

    And that is about the short of it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik
    Hey Sam,

    The weekend is here!

    charged terms: ‘nefarious’, ‘ignoble’, ‘white flag treaty’ among others. One should use those terms under careful advisement.
     
    I agree

    I question your use of Freedman’s version of of the proceedings for the war period 1914-1919, by noting that his was a flawed version, not just in the factual accounting of events but more so in its failure to clearly distinguish responsibilities of various parties, including Zionist leaders who showed up in numbers at Versailles to secure a promise made to them by the British.
     
    huh?

    It was Freedman's point that WWI was dragged out and Germany was defeated due to the intrigues of Zionists. You seem to be re-making his point for him.

    American zionists as American citizens lobbied successfully to procure American participation, and that was the clinching factor, but it is hardly the principal reason why America went to war; it saw great commercial and Industrial opportunity in an expectedly defeated postwar Germany] So the Germans lost, signed an armistice and the victorious allies continued to exact punishment on the German population until they saw their way clear to go to Versailles. If that is what you call ‘ignoble’, you would be wrong, since Germany would have done precisely the same, as they had amply demonstrated in previous wars with Russia and France.
     
    The American people didn't want war and didn't care about "Industrial opportunities". They had to be lied into the war with lies about Belgian babies tossed on bayonets and the sinking of the Lusitania, which was cynically used by the regime as a casus belli to get Americans to agree to fight the war. And we all know now that the Germans were right and that the Lusitania was an armaments ship full of war munitions and Germany had every right to sink it. The American passengers were used just like their tried to use the sailors on the USS Liberty, as chumps to be sacrificed for their war treachery aims. (there's that word again. I call it treachery because the American government knew the ship had munitions and hoped and expected the Germans to sink it. When they boarded the American passengers on that ship, they did so hoping they would die horribly so that their lives could be used as a pretext to slaughter even more people. Kind of like 911, when they told the people in the second tower after the first jet hit to return to their offices and cubicles and that there was no danger. Knowing that the second jet was on its way and knowing that many of those people were going to be slaughtered. But just like with the Lusitania, and USS Liberty, they wanted maximum casualties as their pretext and casus belli for a contrived war. I call that treachery Sam. What would you call it?)

    What I call ignoble Sam is the way the allies tricked the Germans into disarming so they could starve them into signing the extremely ignoble Treaty of Versailles that tuned the German people into slaves of the allies and handed them over to hostile regimes by the millions and allowed people hostile to the Germans (mainly Jews) to buy up Germany's newspapers and cultural institutions like the theaters and positions of power at pennies on the dollar and then lord it over the Germans and mock them and scourge them and turn their teenagers into prostitutes and often homosexual prostitutes and turned Berlin into one big brothel for the perverts of the world. Very ignoble indeed. But perhaps not as ignoble as the betrayal (and I consider all betrays as ignoble Sam) as using Wilson's Fourteen Points to get the Germans to trust the devious scoundrels who plotted against Germany (out of sheer envy) and told the German people that if they would just lay down their arms, that the agreement that was going to be used was based on these Fourteen Points that promised national self-determination. Which is all Germany ever wanted in the first place. So the German government agreed to this treachery and the ignoble betrayal followed. Once Germany laid down their arms, the allies ripped up the Fourteen Points and told Germany that they were to agree to enslave the people of Germany to the allies and bankers and assorted treacherous fiends who hated the German people and foisted the infamous Weimar Republic on them which led to Adolf Hitler and the Nazis and the Holocaust and sixty million people slaughtered that basically you can trace to the Balfour Declaration. But then they got their Israel didn't they? On the smoking ruins of Europe and so many millions of dead Russians and Europeans and unimaginable suffering. I guess in order to make an omelet, eh Sam?

    What was the treachery? On the part of which German Jew?
     
    No, the treachery was on the part of the allies. England and Belgium and France and Poland, etc. Wilson and his Fourteen Points was a dupe and was simply laughed out of the room. As far as the Jews go, that's all there in Freedman's screed. And their treachery came latter in the form of abusing the German people once they had control of the government and cultural institutions. They used that power to promote homosexuality and denigrate the Germans and even their ancestors and perhaps most intolerably the young men whose lives were so tragically squandered in the trenches by fat, rich old men who profited while the young men

    http://www.corbisimages.com/images/Corbis-UWW371INP.jpg?size=67&uid=a5b1ae9a-5d32-454d-9b3e-46992904ebc1

    Kipling wrote a short poem about it

    If any ask why we died- tell them because our fathers lied


    'Charged terms' like ‘nefarious’ or ‘ignoble’ don't even begin to describe the evil and horrors these young men suffered. The mustard gas, artillery wounds, the mindless inhumanity and all because of rich old sacs of shit who didn't get so much as a scratch on their manicured fingers.
    (I'm not a fan of contrived wars for the fun and profit of powerful old men while the poor are burned alive or enslaved in gulags are worked to death or wander the world missing limbs or eyes or worse. Words like nefarious are inadequate. Men like John McCain and Lindsey Graham and Dick Cheney deserve to die like the way they send others to die for their own profit and vanity. May they rot in hell.

    He did accept that responsibility and shepherded Germany through the Treaty of Rapallo with the nascent Soviet Union and Versailles, only to be assassinated by the extreme Right.
     
    Good!


    The Right in Germany [including the military leadership corps] conveniently and absurdly blamed the Jews for their own failure to win the Spring Offensive
     
    They blamed the Jews f0r bringing America into the war against them. And they were right to do so. Even as the Jewish people prospered and thrived in Germany, they treacherously brought about Germany's ruin for goals of their own. You too would be resentful for such a thing if you were a young corporal in the trenches watching your comrades get maimed and slaughtered for nothing.

    I guess Sam you'd just put all of that down to, 'hey, it was war'. But then what about the Holocaust? Was that also just a case of.. 'what's the big deal. It was war after all?'

    So who are you calling a traitor? Weizmann? Jabotinsky? Arlozoroff? None of these men were German and owed no allegiance to Germany! They correctly backed the winner and demanded that the victor honour their pledge in the form of the Balfour Declaration.

     

    did I call anyone a traitor? It wasn't that the Jews were traitors, it was specifically the treachery of selling out Germany, (who had welcomed the Jews into their country after they came running for their lives from the Tzar and were very prosperous in Germany, only to have their hospitality betrayed when the Jews saw some advantage for themselves in backing England. How would you feel if you were a German back then and watched all of this unfold? Germany suffered terribly under the Versailles Treaty. They suffered the ravages of having foreign Jews buy up Germany after the war. Remember our conversations about the Fed and how it's a counterfeiting machine for the Jewish bankers who own it? Well they used that counterfeiting machine to buy up Germany and turn it into a playground for the world's wealthy and powerful perverts and assorted scum. (I admit those last words were a value judgment call)

    Palestine was not their’s to carve.
     
    on that Sam, we agree.

    as for value judgments, Germany trusted the honor and that 'white flag treaty' of the allies when Germany disarmed and put the fate of Germany and the German people and their future in the, by now infamous Fourteen Points. And then they were betrayed and literally starved into signing away the future of Germany to fiends and scoundrels who took full advantage and raped Germany raw. To add insult to injury they made Germany accept responsibility for a war that Germany didn't start, didn't want to fight and were dragged into by the schemes and treachery of Russia and Europe. It was Germany who wanted to end the war when it was clear that the flower of Europe's youth were being wasted in those terrible trenches. Germany seemed to be the one noble and honorable player in that whole sickening affair, and then were rewarded for their nobility by having the ignoble of the world rape Germany as viciously as any war time rape of an enemies' women.

    The result was WWII and even more slaughter and rape and horrors. And they're (bankers and assorted wealthy and powerful old men) trying to do the same thing in this century.

    Not just Jews Sam, but with people like the Kagan cabal and Sheldon Adelson and Kristol and Bibi and a lot of others, Jews are woefully overrepresented in the cheerleader sections for war. I wish it were otherwise, and its also important to realize that it certainly isn't only Jews clamoring for the blood of innocents. The Sunni regimes and their sub-human thugs running around the Levant are also very troublesome as are the legions of gentile war-pig traitors of Europe and the US to their nations and people.

    I hope saner heads prevail, Sam. I get the impression you'd agree with at least that part.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  205. Sam Shama says:
    @Art
    Surely humans have a benevolent and a malevolent side. The struggle is to at least suppress the latter.

    Sam,

    Good is not the absence of bad – good has to be created – good is a product of actual work. Good can only happen when effort is expended.

    Our time is limited. Time spent suppressing bad is wasted time – it is not time spent working on good. On a plus minus scale – suppressing bad only gets you back to zero. It does not produce the good things that we need to sustain ourselves.

    The answer to bad people is to have nothing to do with them – to ostracize them – thus freeing one’s self for creative work that does good life extending things.

    Art

    Agree. Which is why I said ‘ ….at least suppress the latter’

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  206. @Sam Shama

    First, consider the status of Jews in Germany vis a vis Germans in Germany: which was the “invading” force and which was the indigenous body?
     
    You cannot mean that German Jews as a group were actively plotting against their country; or perhaps you do mean it, for it matters not at at all, Jews being eternal non-citizens definitionally, grouping Germans [who happened to be Jews] with the East European Bolsheviks [not all of whom were Jews] is par for the course. You often throw names like Weizman, Jabotinsky, Phillipe Rothschild etc. when you proffer these pro-NSDAP [better know as Nazis] tropes. Yet it is a rather straightforward matter, turning these particularist arguments on their heads, by simply noting that none of these 'Big Jews' owed any particular allegiance to Germany. To Britain, the Czar and France: certainly, and they shouldered those responsibilities admirably. That the Balfour Declaration was payment for a job well done - well what of it?

    Assimilation was not good enough for zionist Jews: key to the zionist Jewish mindset is the notion that Jews must be in charge
     
    Assimilation is an idea resisted by all human groups: it is called social choice; but that in no way precludes fealty to the country in which such groups claim and receive citizenship. If the Zionist mindset yearns to be in charge, so does the Italian, the British, the American, the Chinese, the Japanese, the Nigerian, the Iranian, and the Zambian. It might be coded in our DNA, broadly referred to as the human condition.

    The reality is Jews left Germany, under the directive of Louis Brandeis, after Brandeis & other zionist and Jewish leaders recognized that the vision they conceived in the aftermath of WWI and the German Revolution in 1918, of Jews successfully taking control of Germany, failed: Jews were a dominant force in Weimar and Weimar was a failure, politically, intellectually, financially and culturally.
     
    I would not call it a directive; more like sound advice on account of the slaughter that follwed. So if the Jews had failed in their sinister plot to take over Germany in 1918, how does that reconcile with you subsequent claim that Jews were undermining Germany from their internal control?

    The two paragraphs that follow the block I highlighted immediately above, are pathetic. Jewish immigration to the U.S. whether the result of opportunities or asylum, aided or not by prominent American Jews who were citizens of the U.S., presents no crime as such, does it? There is no requirement that individuals or citizen advocacy groups engage the channels of immigration, observing some strict requirement of uniformity administered to all nationalities. It has never been so in the U.S. That Jewish American citizens advocated for Jewish immigration, is no different from any other group or groups [WASPs e.g.] that have historically advocated immigration for their own kith and kin and, not to put too fine a point on it, had actually resisted immigration from southern and eastern Europe and prevented it from Asia.


    In their myth-history, on their way out Jews destroy the states where they had earlier dwelt prosperously, Egypt is the model.
     
    Right you are. Would you care for a bit of that 'Prosperity'? I hear the Saudis, wearing the modern mantle of Pharaonic traditions are happy to oblige.

    I oppose the WB Zionists and their facilitators in this country, but the more I read such accounting of Jews as viruses, the less constant I feel in my resolve, that people can get past - once again - the Human Condition.

    Yet it is a rather straightforward matter, turning these particularist arguments on their heads, by simply noting that none of these ‘Big Jews’ owed any particular allegiance to Germany. To Britain, the Czar and France: certainly, and they shouldered those responsibilities admirably. That the Balfour Declaration was payment for a job well done – well what of it?

    Weizmann = Chalabi. He was not exerting his efforts for the ultimate benefit of the British; rather, he instrumentalized Britain for the benefit of Jews/zionists/the Palestine project.

    In what way did Weizmann benefit the British?
    Did the British win WWI in any meaningful way?

    The British did not win the war, but Germany certainly lost.

    Jews, however, did win: Edwin Black wrote in “The Transfer Agreement” that zionist Jews returned from Versailles in triumph — a dual triumph: they had acquired a homeland for Jews in Palestine, and affirmation of minority rights for Jews in European states where they dwelt.

    It’s possible, just maybe, that the German people noticed that at the cost of their children dying of starvation, Jews “achieved a dual triumph.”

    Rurik’s use of the word “treacherous” is appropriate:
    1. According to his long-time assistant, Leonard Stein, Weizmann set up three categories of antisemitism in the British leaders for whom, in your view, Weizmann was providing so much value. He assessed the type of antisemitism evident in the leaders he would need to influence, then set about exploiting that antisemitic impetus to gain his goal — the Balfour declaration.
    2. Once having isolated Lord Balfour as a suitable quarry, Baron Rothschild visited him daily, stroking his ego.
    3. Jews did not keep a key term of the Balfour declaration — that the Arabs in the region not be negatively impacted by Jewish settlement. The British agreed to plant Jews in Palestine for their own strategic interests, but it was also essential to British interests to maintain good relations with Arabs. Jews in Palestine interfered with that British requirement. Before very long, Jews effectively expelled the British from Palestine, having been weakened by the war that Weizmann helped them win.

    As for Rathenau — if I recall correctly he was in charge of industrial production and also of balancing domestic and war demands. Once again referring to Edwin Black’s “The Transfer Agreement,” where Black mentions in a decidedly cavalier manner the starvation-death of 800,000 German civilians, he blames it on inappropriate decisions to use resources to fight the war rather than to feed the population. Those decisions would have been made at Rathenau’s desk.
    (The very fact that Black treats the starvation of 800,000 German civilians so off-handedly suggests that very few, if any, Jews suffered starvation. Indeed, Jewish welfare agencies operated throughout the region during and after the war, assisting Polish Jews to safer harbor in Germany, and distributing either food or sufficient financial resources so that German Jews could obtain stuffs on black market. Germans who watched their children die may not have failed to notice that Jewish children were not starving.)


    Louis Brandeis’s directive that Jews should leave Germany will be discussed at a later time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  207. RobinG says:
    @Fran Macadam
    One of the very practical purposes for a mass surveillance system that stores everything recorded for use by posterity. Should anyone show importance, they can be investigated and if anything at all is found, turned to advantage. It works whether it's deployed against enemy foreigners, or allied opponents or even loyal citizens. The object is dominance and control. The technological imperative in our age, where there is a deep state, as Phil's recent presentation at Georgetown showed, and where secret legal memos justify anything, is that there is no more moral restraint beyond "what can be done, will be done."

    One of the interesting aspects I would have liked to have brought out had I been able to be present at that session with Bill Lind and Phil, is to ask about the transnational aspect of the Deep State, as evidenced by the integration of the democratically unaccountable Five Eyes Anglo agencies, which seem to have a greater loyalty and accountability to each other than to their respective public facing governments. The recent statements by British military leaders that they would never allow a democratically elected Corbyn government to take power means their loyalty lies elsewhere. Where?

    Do you mean this at GW ?

    The State and Modern War

    Read More
    • Replies: @Philip Giraldi
    No this - http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/a-new-way-forward-for-american-foreign-policy-2/?mc_cid=4cbe9c855f&mc_eid=17a379207c
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  208. geokat62 says:
    @Avery
    {Hell, I’d love to get a glimpse of the Mossad’s blackmail list. Half the U.S. Government is probably on it. . . .}

    There are apparently lots of US Congress blackmail lists.
    Maybe names on blackmail lists are being sold or exchanged between parties.

    Years ago former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds was saying that former Speaker Hastert was being blackmailed. She didn't say by whom. But this year it came out, when Hastert was nailed for lying about suspicious large cash withdrawals.

    Apparently he was paying off one of his victims for many years.
    Hastert was sexually victimizing male students when he was coach at some high school.
    Apparently Turks found out about it - or bought the info from some other party, most likely Israelis - and blackmailed him into going along with their denialist agenda. Apparently there was also a payoff of $500K.

    Hastert pleaded guilty to some federal financial crime: so there will be no public trial. All the years of him prostituting himself for some foreign government(s), while on the payroll of US taxpayers, gets buried.

    How convenient.

    Anyone remember Senator Larry Craig ? the one who was arrested for soliciting a male prostitute in a public restroom.
    US Congress must be full of weirdos, who are hiding something and are being blackmailed.

    Apparently Turks found out about it – or bought the info from some other party, most likely Israelis – and blackmailed him into going along with their denialist agenda.

    This is how the game is played: through the power of The Lobby, the USG has entered into an MOU with the Zionist state to “share” signal intelligence that is collected on all US citizens. And to mitigate against the risk of blackmail, the MOU stipulates that should the Israelis come across information on high level USG officials, they will immediately destroy it. Ever wonder why some congress people – Lindsey Graham, John McCain, Dennis Hastert, Jan Schakowsky, etc. – are passionate defenders of the Zionist state?… now you know.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. @RobinG
    Do you mean this at GW ?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipWqr1Vnyj4
    The State and Modern War
    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    Thanks. Same thing (but your link has the other panels).
    , @Fran Macadam
    Sorry about that - everything inside the Beltway exists for me through a haze best described as Foggy Bottom. George Washington, not Georgetown, yes. I suppose I was as confused as Washington Irving's somnolent fugitive from a termagant spouse, when he found the King George Arms transformed into the George Washington Arms, but this time in the other direction.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  210. RobinG says:
    @Philip Giraldi
    No this - http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/a-new-way-forward-for-american-foreign-policy-2/?mc_cid=4cbe9c855f&mc_eid=17a379207c

    Thanks. Same thing (but your link has the other panels).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  211. Compare Niall Ferguson’s version of the WWI narrative with Sam Shama’s:

    “A narrative of WWI makes no sense. . . . A war begins. Bad guys in Central Europe start a war. They are hugely successful in the initial phase of the war. The British intervene and do disastrously in 1915. Then in 1916 they do even more disastrously. Then in 1917 they set a new record for doing disastrously, called Passendale. Then in the Spring of 1918 the Germans come within shelling distance of Paris with the most successful offensive of the war in the Western front to that date. And then in the Summer of 1918 the Germans collapse and the Allies win the war. . . . It makes no sense, because right up until the very last minute the side that wins seems to be doing significantly worse, and indeed it is.
    . . . The central powers were able to kill more than 30% of our side than they themselves endured. On a month-by-month basis there is no period when the Germans are not successfully killing more French and British soldiers then they are losing themselves.

    So my book . . . asks three questions: Why did the war start; Why on earth did it keep going, and why does it stop?

    It was inevitable that a war would start in Europe. What was not inevitable was the decision of the British government to intervene in that war. The decision taken in August 1914 was the greatest error of the 20th century: it was unlikely that the British would join the inevitable war on the European continent, and even more unlikely that the war should be joined by the United States of America.

    It would have been better for the world in general if Britain had not intervened in 1914 and allowed the Germans to win a continental war, as they had allowed the Germans to win in 1870. . . .

    What would a German victory have looked like? Answer: a lot like the European Union that we see today. That was a stated aim of the German war effort, and this goalThe German goals of unifying Europe and dismantling Russia posed in no way a threat to the British empire, and posed a lesser threat to the British than intervening. . . .”

    close

    but no ceegar.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  212. @Philip Giraldi
    No this - http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/a-new-way-forward-for-american-foreign-policy-2/?mc_cid=4cbe9c855f&mc_eid=17a379207c

    Sorry about that – everything inside the Beltway exists for me through a haze bes