The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Greg Johnson Archive
Understanding the Poway Synagogue Shooting
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
John Earnest

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

It happens now with accelerating regularity: a white man who is alarmed at white ethnic displacement goes to a place of worship used by non-whites and starts shooting.

  • On Friday, March 15, 2019, a 28-year-old white man, Brenton Tarrant, reportedly entered the Al Noor Mosque and the Linwood Islamic Centre in Christchurch, New Zealand, killing at 50 people and wounding around 40 others.
  • On Saturday, October 27, 2018, a 46-year-old white man, Robert Bowers, was arrested for entering the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh, killing eleven people and wounding six others, including four police officers.
  • On Sunday, January 29, 2017, a 27-year-old white man, Alexandre Bissonnette, entered the Islamic Cultural Center in Quebec City, Canada, killed six Muslims gathered for prayer, and injured eight more.
  • On Wednesday, June 17, 2015, a 21-year-old white man, Dylann Storm Roof, entered the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina, killed nine blacks gathered for Bible study, and injured three more.
  • On Sunday, August 5, 2012, a 40-year-old white man, Wade Michael Page, a racist skinhead, opened fire at a Sikh temple near Milwaukee, killing six worshipers and wounding three others. He then shot and killed himself.

And now it has happened again:

  • On Saturday, April 27, a John Earnest, a 19-year-old white man reportedly walked into the Chabad synagogue in Poway, California, near Los Angeles and shot two people, killing one. Two others were injured by shrapnel.

Because these shootings all follow the same basic pattern, I have created a boilerplate article responding to them:

The basic argument is always the same. I just need to change a few of the particulars.

As a white person, I look down upon the criminals among us. I do not reflexively defend and glorify them. This was a terrible act: immoral, illegal, and politically damaging to white interests. I hope Earnest receives a fair trial and just punishment, but that seems unlikely given the racially charged atmosphere in America today.

We obviously don’t know all the facts yet, but based on the manifesto attributed to Earnest, he believes that Jews are collectively responsible for a long list of historical crimes, including the ongoing genocide of the white race:

Every Jew is responsible for the meticulously planned genocide of the European race. They act as a unit, and every Jew plays his part to enslave the other races around him—whether consciously or subconsciously. Their crimes are endless. For lying and deceiving the public through their exorbitant role in news media; for using usury and banks to enslave nations in debt and control all finances for the purpose of funding evil; for their role in starting wars on a foundation of lies which have costed millions of lives throughout history; for their role in cultural Marxism and communism; for pushing degenerate propaganda in the form of entertainment; for their role in feminism which has enslaved women in sin; for causing many to fall into sin with their role in peddling pornography; for their role in voting for and funding politicians and organizations who use mass immigration to displace the European race; for their large role in every slave trade for the past two-thousand years; for promoting race mixing; for their cruel and bloody history of genocidal behavior; for their persecution of Christians of old (including the prophets of ancient Israel—Jeremiah, Isaiah, etc.), members of the early church (Stephen—whose death at the hands of the Jews was both heart-wrenching and rage-inducing), Christians of modern-day Syria and Palestine, and Christians in White nations; for their degenerate and abominable practices of sexual
perversion and blood libel (you are not forgotten Simon of Trent, the horror that you and countless children have endured at the hands of the Jews will never be forgiven); for not speaking about these crimes; for not attempting to stop the members of their race from committing them. And finally, for their role in the murder of the Son of Man—that is the Christ. Every Jew young and old has contributed to these. For these crimes they deserve nothing but hell.

I will send them there.

I am sure many more facts will come to light in the coming months and at Earnest’s trial. But still, I can say three things with confidence.

First, this could not have happened in a homogeneously white society. It could not have happened if the Poway Chabad synagogue were located in Israel, for instance. I have no desire to absolve John Earnest, much less blame his victims. But he would not be a killer, and his victims would not be dead, if they did not have to coexist in a multicultural society.

When different peoples are forced to live together in the same system, frictions are inevitable. These frictions give rise to misunderstandings, distrust, alienation, and long-simmering resentments, which flare up into hatred, violence, and social upheaval. Earnest’s actions are predictable consequences of multiculturalism. Sadly, we will only see more such violence until white nations regain their sanity and reverse multiculturalism.

Thus the New Right stands for the principle of racial divorce. It is time for whites and non-whites to go our separate ways and pursue our own destinies. We stand for the creation of separate racially homogeneous societies, through the peaceful and humane process of redrawing borders and shifting populations.

In the case of recent immigrant populations, the best solution is for them to return to their homelands. I also think that is the best solution for groups like Jews, Japanese, and Chinese who have been in America for a long time but still maintain strong ties to their homelands. In the case of American Indians and the descendants of black slaves, territorial partition or semi-autonomous reservations would seem to be in order.

Second, we should resist dismissing Earnest with the all-too-easy claim that he was “crazy.” Yes, Earnest did something evil and stupid. But Earnest’s underlying motive — fear of white race replacement — is not irrational or insane. It is a healthy reaction to objective facts. All white people have innate ethnocentric tendencies, wired deep in our brains. We love our own and we fear strangers. As diversity increases, all of us will bear increased psychic costs, even those who pursue wealth and status by selling out their own people in favor of foreigners.

Earnest and people like him may be nothing more than canaries in a coal mine: the first to sense the presence of a threat to the survival of us all. Earnest may have just been abnormally sensitive to the terrible psychic consequences of losing control of our society to aliens: stress, alienation, anger, hatred, rage, etc. Earnest’s manifesto, in particular, is dominated by a tone of depression and hopelessness. This heightened sensitivity might also go along with a whole suite of other abnormal traits. But we dismiss people like Earnest at our own risk. For in the end, all of us will feel the same effects — unless we heed the warning signs and turn back the rising tide of color.

Third, Earnest’s “solution” to his rage and alienation — killing innocent people — just makes the racial situation worse rather than better. We will surely learn a lot more about Earnest’s ideas and affiliations in the coming months. But based on what we know now, we can say that his actions certainly resemble those of racially-motivated spree killers like Brenton Tarrant (whose example he explicitly cites), Robert Bowers(also mentioned by Earnest), Dylann Roof, Anders Behring Breivik, Wade Michael Page, and Frazier Glenn Miller, all of whom are products of what I call “Old Right” thinking.

By the “Old Right,” I mean classical Fascism and National Socialism and their contemporary imitators who believe that White Nationalism can be advanced through such means as one party-politics, terrorism, totalitarianism, imperialism, and genocide. Earnest specifically names Adolf Hitler as one of his inspirations, alongside Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, and Martin Luther. Earnest also names Ludwig van Beethoven, Pewdiepie, Moon Man, and Pink Guy. The last three, of course, are mentioned merely as Alt Right in-jokes.

Today’s Old Right scene is rife with fantasies of race war, lone wolf attacks on non-whites, and heroic last stands that end in a hail of police bullets. Intelligent and honorable people have emerged from this milieu. But there have been more than a few spree-killers as well.

This kind of violence is worse than a crime. It is a mistake. It does nothing to advance our cause and much to set us back.

Given that reason, science, and history are all on our side, and the greatest apparatus of coercion and brainwashing in human history is on the enemy’s side, doesn’t it make sense to attack the enemy at his weakest point rather than at his strongest? This is why the North American New Right pursues White Nationalism through intellectual and cultural means: we critique the hegemony of anti-white ideas and seek to establish a counter-hegemony of pro-white ideas.

Only a fool picks a battle he cannot win, and we cannot win with violence. Fortunately, we don’t have to. The Left lost the Cold War but won the peace through the establishment of intellectual and cultural hegemony. We can beat them the same way.

Furthermore, the only form of violence that even has a chance to be productive in halting multiculturalism and non-white immigration would target the people responsible for these policies, not random innocents.

Moreover, killing innocent people (at a place of worship!) has entirely predictable results. First, such violence creates sympathy for the victims. (Even I feel sympathy for them, and I would deport them all tomorrow if I had the power.) Second, it plays into the establishment narrative of evil, crazy, intolerant whites whose freedom of speech and weapons must be taken away.

As I argue in my essay “Against White Nationalist Terrorism,” White Nationalists are making tremendous progress by means of propaganda. We are converting people to our worldview. The more people we convert, the sooner we regain control of our homelands. This is why our enemies are hell-bent on censoring and deplatforming us. They use every shooting spree like Tarrant’s or Earnest’s as a pretext to further clamp down on our freedom of speech, which restricts our ability to change minds and delays the implementation of sane, nationalist policies. And every day we are delayed is paid for in white lives.

John Earnest killed one 60-year-old Jewish woman. But far more white people will die if his deeds lead to further erosions of freedom.

There is some reason to think that Earnest actually intended to encourage deplatforming. First of all, he makes it clear that he took primary inspiration from Tarrant, who expressly wished to provoke a crack-down on free speech and gun ownership. Second, Earnest’s mention of Pewdiepie was clearly patterned on Tarrant’s shout-out, which led to the shutdown of Pewdiepie’s Reddit page.

Was Earnest even thinking about the greater good of our people? Or was he merely indulging in blind, self-destructive spite?

Did he think this is just a game? The references to Pewdiepie, Moon Man, Pink Guy, and other Alt-Right memes are manifestations of the degenerate Alt-Right swamp of ironism, frivolity, and anti-intellectualism that will keep breeding catastrophes until it is drained and replaced with a nobler and more serious ethos.

And how exactly does praising spree killers help White Nationalists establish ourselves as representatives of the long-term best interests of our people?

I wish I could erect a wall between myself and the kind of unstable, undisciplined people who go on killing sprees, but you can’t change the world from a bunker. Thus responsible white advocates need to adopt the next best course of action: (1) we must be alert to the signs of mental instability and inclinations toward violence and rigorously screen out such people, (2) we need to draw clear, unambiguous intellectual lines between New Right and Old Right approaches, and (3) if anyone makes concrete threats of committing such acts in our circles, we need to be the ones to call the police.

The goal is to persuade our people that White Nationalism is the solution to ethnic conflict not the cause of it. Spree killers and the people who celebrate them are part of the problem, not part of the solution.

(Republished from Counter-Currents Publishing by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 44 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. I read Greg’s essay from bottom to top.

    it makes more sense that way.

    try it! NB:

    the entire alt-Lite/Right “leadership” is a complete joke.

    that’ll become evident when the Jewbuck dies. Then:

    uniform = skin color.

    • Replies: @Haxo Angmark
  2. @Haxo Angmark

    you can find John Earnest’s entire Manifesto @

    http://dailystormer.name

    it’s pretty solid stuff, though a bit repetitive.

    his Chopin performance is also there. And I’ll say this:

    he plays better than he shoots.

  3. Anon[106] • Disclaimer says:

    When different peoples are forced to live together in the same system, frictions are inevitable. These frictions give rise to misunderstandings, distrust, alienation, and long-simmering resentments, which flare up into hatred, violence, and social upheaval. Earnest’s actions are predictable consequences of multiculturalism. Sadly, we will only see more such violence until white nations regain their sanity and reverse multiculturalism.

    Thus the New Right stands for the principle of racial divorce. It is time for whites and non-whites to go our separate ways and pursue our own destinies. We stand for the creation of separate racially homogeneous societies, through the peaceful and humane process of redrawing borders and shifting populations.

    What happens now between homogeneous groups in the same country would happen then between homogeneous nations, the frictions, alienation, long-simmering resentments, flaring up into war.
    The more ethnocentrism in nations, the more wars between nations.
    At least, with multi-racialism, there is a try to defuse conflict.
    And if propaganda authors worked to spread appeasement, instead of working as they do to spread suspicion and resentment, most conflict between groups would disappear over some time.

  4. Anon[106] • Disclaimer says:

    We love our own and we fear strangers. As diversity increases, all of us will bear increased psychic costs

    Ancestral psychological heritage is there to be gotten past, step by step, when civilizational progress asks for it.
    Again: the problem is the anti-White propaganda, and, on a lesser level, other racist propaganda dressed as anti-racism, that aims to stoke suspicion and rivalry between groups.
    People are much more civilized than in the past, and, absent such propaganda, peaceful inter-ethnic co-existence would not be so out of reach a goal as it may seem now.

  5. peterAUS says:

    …if anyone makes concrete threats of committing such acts in our circles, we need to be the ones to call the police.

    Informative.

    May I suggest, just for your types:
    When something as this happens again you’ll need to up your game. You’ll need to get proactive. I mean, you haven’t seen that one coming, so, you must change your approach.
    So, you’ll need to start “probing”. Seeking possible “shooters”. You know, start conversations, see how it goes.
    Now, there is a catch. You have to be sure. I mean, calling the police in this atmosphere for THAT will surely destroy the fellow you reported in. Thinking about it…well…I am sure it occurred to you…that’s a nice way to get rid of somebody you don’t like. Anyway….
    Ah, one more thing. You “report” once you are in the system. There is a name for that person and the relationship with the police. The police know that too and act accordingly. Anyway….
    Ah, another catch: when you are “official”, I mean in the system, as sni…I mean “concerned citizen”, should an event happen and you failed to see it…hehe…you’ll assume some responsibility. I am sure you haven’t thought about it but don’t worry, you’ll get if fast.
    Makes sense?

    If not even better.

  6. Collectively blaming all Jews, just like collectively blaming all whites for various things, shows a person’s ignorance.

    If someone found out where a bunch of Zionist Neo-Cons hang out and went in and opened fired on them for all the misery their warmongering for Israel has caused….it would still be disgusting and evil, but it would be more understandable than opening fire on just average Jewish people who, like most Americans, have been brilliantly deceived and indoctrinated.

    • Replies: @in the middle
  7. WHAT says:

    Ivory tower of impotent intellectualism shall not be tainted by direct action, oy vey lol.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  8. Jay Fink says:

    I am not a self hating Jew in the least but I identify more strongly as an American and as a white person. I know you guys don’t think I’m white but I do and so does every single person who interacts with me. Being Jewish is not a part of my self identity. One friend of mine who has known me for 20 years just recently discovered I am Jewish and he was surprised. It just never came up. Not that I’m ashamed it’s just something I don’t think of much. I wasn’t raised religious and don’t know a word of Hebrew. I’m politically conservative and voted for Trump.

    If I went to Israel like you want it would be a foreign culture to me. I belong in the U.S with everyone who is here, not in Israel with only other Jews. What would you do with my one close Jewish friend? He has become a practicing Chriatian and is in a happy marriage with a Colombian woman. Do you split them apart, send him to Israel and her to Colombia? I don’t like your idea and thankfully it’s not going to happen.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
    , @HammerJack
  9. Dodgy elements in this house of religion shooting, as usual, as pointed out by Aangirfan on her site

    We are told the rabbi, whose life was saved when 60-year-old Lori Gilbert-Kaye jumped between him and the shooter … then continued his sermon after Gilbert-Kaye was shot and dead … Wot?

    The off-duty border patrolman was shooting back … and didn’t hit him? But then the young man who survived a gunfight and successfully escaped … immediately called the ‘911’ emergency number and invited the police to come and accept his docile surrender along the motorway?

    This event *exactly* 6 months after the ‘Pittsburgh synagogue massacre by Robert Bowers’ on 27 October 2018

    The ‘shooter manifesto’ once again seems fairly fake … plain text version online here:
    https://pastebin.com/VXXFQMTW

    The manifesto author continues the same joke as ‘Brenton Tarrant’ made, of tying the ‘white identity terrorists’ to one of the world’s most popular YouTubers, the Swedish video game commenter PewDiePie with tens of millions of followers. ‘John T. Earnest’ writes:

    « I did not do this alone. I had the help of a man named Felix Arvid Ulf Kjellberg. He was kind enough to plan and fund this whole operation – the sly bastard. Apparently, Pewdiepie hates Jews as much as Pajeets. Who would’ve known? »

    And the author makes a pre-emptive move to dismiss criticism of possible fakery here:

    « … remember Robert Bowers, remember Brenton Tarrant … and filter the schizos who will inevitably call this a ‘false flag’ … »

    ‘Earnest’ trolls Donald Trump, asking himself:
    « “Are you a Trump supporter?”
    You mean that Zionist, Jew-loving, anti-White, traitorous cocksucker? Don’t make me laugh. »

    ‘Earnest’, also claims to be the arsonist in a fire the previous month on 24 March at the nearby Dar-ul-Arqam mosque – Islamic Center of Escondido, California:

    « People grossly overestimate the police’s ability to solve ‘crimes’ such as ‘arson’ and ‘murder.’ … I scorched a mosque in Escondido with gasoline a week after Brenton Tarrant’s sacrifice and they never found shit on me … Also they didn’t report the message I spray-painted on the parking lot. I wrote ‘For Brenton Tarrant’ … It is so easy to … get away with burning a synagogue (or mosque) to the ground if you’re smart about it. »

    Chabad is know for its connections with Mossad … and Chabad synagogues are often seen as Mossad safe houses and operations centres

  10. neir says:

    here’s an explanation: some people did something

  11. the North American New Right pursues White Nationalism through intellectual and cultural means: we critique the hegemony of anti-white ideas and seek to establish a counter-hegemony of pro-white ideas

    ‘Renzo’, an Italian, posted a comment on Greg Johnson’s 2016 obituary for the Alt Right. A couple of excerpts:

    Many of us intellectual types like to think we can influence the public mood and way of thinking by rational argumentation and clever persuasion.

    Greg, you are my favorite author in the movement, and you make, as usual, very valid points, but I think you are far too optimistic about the possibility to slowly, patiently, reasonably influence the social and political currents in the next few years.

    Our (((enemies))) have reduced the white nations to a giant powder keg of misery, distrust, centuries old feuds, barely contained hatred and blood-lust. It is only a matter of time before some bigger than usual Muslim attack, some outrageous genocidal demand of overconfident overlords, the unintended consequences of a false flag or—most likely—a sharp economic downturn in the middle of a new migrant wave sets it all off.

    Nature is about to come back in the window, with a vengeance. The good news is, they can’t stop it. The bad news is, we can’t control it.

  12. KenH says:

    We can beat them the same way.

    While inroads have been made the (((enemy))) has no intention of letting us beat them the same way as evidenced by the doxxing and deplatforming. From things I’ve read much more is on the way and we can’t beat the enemy the same way when they’ve booted all pro-whites off social media and the internet.

    The Jews were once champions of a broadly interpreted first amendment since it was one of the weapons they used to brainwash unsuspecting white goyim and deconstruct our civilization But now that’s largely accomplished it’s now expendable, hence the calls for speech codes, censorship and “hate speech” laws.

  13. Polar says:

    I’m not going to praise what any of these shooters did either but will criticize people like this author who think that they are superior for being naive cowards that believe ZOG will allow them to peacefully vote their way out of being ethnically replaced.

    At least these shooters can accept the ugly reality stated by JFK that “when peaceful revolution becomes impossible, violent revolution becomes inevitable” even if the way they implement violence is counterproductive. Lone anything isn’t going to solve problems never mind shooting.

    People on the coward wing of the alt-right think they are “intelligent” (euphemism for cowardly) enough that they can thwart ethnic replacement without any substantial risk or sacrifice to themselves including missing a middle class paycheck in some cases.

    Oi Vey! The Goyim Know! Shut it down!

    Yup, that’s how ZOG works in the real world according to these “intelligent” cowards. Lol.

  14. @Jay Fink

    Thank you! I never understood the meme that goes: Born of a Jewish mother, always a Jew. I was born of a devout Christian mother, but have rejected that religion. Am I still born a Christian, always a Christian?

    • Replies: @Realist
  15. Johnson writes: “In the case of American Indians and the descendants of black slaves, territorial partition or semi-autonomous reservations would seem to be in order.” Please, Greg, you didn’t say the word RESERVATIONS did you?

    And what would Johnson do with the millions of mulattos/biracials today? Or how about President Obama? Since he is not descended from American slaves, does he go back to Africa? Or does his white half save him? I only point this example out to show that Johnson’s hopes for a white ethno-state, achieved thru peaceful means, belongs in the realm of fantasy. Face it, whites will never be allowed to “peacefully” secede. If nothing else, they need our tax money.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Anonymous
  16. More realistic would be listening to Jesus, rather than these fantastical suggestions.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Anon
  17. @freedom-cat

    I am glad some people found out who their real enemy is!

    All this stuff about, whites love their own, is ravish. I had contact with several racial groups, and one in particular was abhorrent to me: Vietnamese! They are disgusting group o people, all of them I have had contact with.
    Once my sister told me that she disliked such and such people, that they were this and that. I asked her, do you like all whites? she obviously said ‘no!”. well, then, there are ugly disgusting persons in all races. So Do you think that blacks love ‘all’ blacks? The obvious response is “NO”. Do Mexicans love all Mexicans? By the violence and killings in Mexico, what is the answer?

    Same everywhere, I guess. The ugliness in people, is not their ‘races’ but in their inner being. I was in the US Military with all sorts of people. And some were dislike-able, and others were pleasant.

    I only met three Jews, and to be truthful, all THREE were dislike-able, and treacherous, without going into details here. They lied, and treated others with contempt. So there it is.
    By the way, most people consider Jews as ‘whites’ except themselves!

  18. As a white person, I look down upon the criminals among us. I do not reflexively defend and glorify them. This was a terrible act: immoral, illegal, and politically damaging to white interests.

    This shooting was a hoax and so are the other shootings (i.e. New Zealand).

    https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=2GY3W7ANDXXH

    When the hell are people going to wake up and realize this level of ongoing, organic violence has NO precedent in US history, thus calling its authenticity into serious question?

    How many times do you need to see the AR-15 put on display and flanked by legislation in the Senate / House by Feinstein and (((Cicilline))) to realize this is, largely, an attack on the 2nd Amendment?

    How many times do you need to see white people featured prominently who miraculously leave behind “manifestos” to recognize this is a power struggle of Jews against white, Christian America? Brad Schneider, a Jew, has put up legislation to address the threat of terrorism from “white supremacists”. The obvious goal here is to run these hoaxes featuring “white supremacist” terrorists to ratchet up police state power/focus on the white, Christian majority in America.

    Beyond that, these hoaxes are used to paint the white, Christian majority as the enemy and promote Jewish victimhood to wage war on the 2nd Amendment and try to sneak in “hate crime” and “hate speech” legislation to protect Jews from criticism.

    • Replies: @Marvelous Goy
  19. @Marvelous Goy

    Correction: “wage war on the 2nd Amendment” -> “wage war on the 1st Amendment”

  20. Anonymous[418] • Disclaimer says:

    Doesn’t your idea of racial divorce imply that European Americans should return to Europe? Why should European Americans stay? If the answer is something about conquest it basically resorts to might is right which means war of all against all.

    My visions of Racial Divorce would be something like 25 percent of the U.S.A is declared to be Euros only and secedes, I don’t care which 25%, and the rest is declared to be the multicultural U.S.A it can’t help but be.

    Demanding more than 25% of the U.S is greedy and unnecessary. Euros should be able to have a nice decent wealthy country with that land. Don’t forget there is also Europe too, and there there is a much stronger case for 100% European Europe.

    • Replies: @KenH
  21. Realist says:

    Fox News is in deep lamentation and high dudgeon over the synagogue shooting; killing one and injuring three….while in Chicago this weekend six were killed and twenty-one injured….not a word.

  22. Realist says:
    @follyofwar

    Born of a Jewish mother, always a Jew.

    That is speaking genetically….not religiously.

  23. Realist says:
    @follyofwar

    Or does his white half save him?

    There is no ‘white half’…I have never heard of a black/white mixed race person claim to be White…..always black.

  24. Realist says:
    @Fran Macadam

    More realistic would be listening to Jesus, rather than these fantastical suggestions.

    Who is this Jesus you speak of?

  25. It is a shame that a seemingly intelligent young man has thrown away his life over this desperate
    incident. Maybe It was his intent to draw publicity to his manifesto the only way he knew how.
    Trump has condemned this as an act of hate but said nothing about the white boy thrown off
    the balcony at the Mall of America.

  26. Anon[289] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Macadam

    But Jesus’s teachings were destined to become the norm in the afterworld, not here on earth, weren’t they?

    Also: what happens, here on earth, where a party cleaves to Jesus’s directions whilst the other parties do not?

  27. KenH says:
    @Anonymous

    Doesn’t your idea of racial divorce imply that European Americans should return to Europe? Why should European Americans stay?

    Why would it and why would Euro Americans not stay?

    Don’t forget there is also Europe too, and there there is a much stronger case for 100% European Europe.

    There’s a very strong case for a European America. Whites founded and built the place and comprised a super duper majority until the 1965 immigration act began bearing fruit. I don’t know what brilliant logic you used to set aside only 25% of the nation for whites when they’re still 60% of the population.

    You sound like a non-white racial chauvinist who thinks the darker pigmentation of your skin confers moral superiority over whites and therefore entitles you to anything you desire, even 75% of the American landmass.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  28. Anonymous[418] • Disclaimer says:
    @KenH

    I came up with 25% because not all euro-americans people are race secessionist, given the choice of moving to a euro-americans only country I think many euro-americans would choose to stay in ethnically open America, whether that choice is right or wrong is not at issue here. I doubt 25% of Americans are white secessionist, so I think the grant of 25% of land is rather generous. Saying whites founded and built the place omits that there was a theft of land, and the use of forced and exploited non-European labor. Why should the descendants of Europeans who pioneered the land get the land but not the descendants of Chinese laborers who built the railways? Let’s also not bullshit that many euro-americans don’t have roots that go back before 1900. there are non-europeans who have been in America longer than euro-americans. European origins does not mean long roots in the U.S.A.

    If you have confidence in euro-American ability, as you should, then you should be able to build a proud prosperous nation on 25% of the landmass, don’t forget Europe too.

    Multiculturalism is a side-effect of empire and to avoid it one should also avoid empire.

    There is also the issue that the U.S has always been a mixing pot of sorts, it is just a side-effect of colonialism, then you add in the immigration from all countries and importation of non-europeans for labor, forced and unforced. European nationalist dreams can only be accomplished in Europe, trying to accomplish them elsewhere will lead to predictable disaster. Granting 25% of the land to race-separatist is very generous and a positive move. Demanding more than 25% is ridiculous and greedy.

    • Replies: @KenH
    , @James Scott
  29. America WAS an ethnostate before the nose opened the borders in 1965.

    America was NOT a “melting pot.”

    That term came from the nose.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  30. Anonymous[418] • Disclaimer says:
    @Robert Dolan

    I don’t know how it could be an ethnostate when it had migration of multiple ethnicities (Dutch, British, German, Italians and pretty much all European nations and immigration from Asia to California during the 1800s and the absorption of French and Spanish/Mexicans from land purchases and wars along with absorption of native tribes) and multiple religious identities and even enforced migration of African slaves. The idea of the U.S as an ethnostate is a total myth, many euros created mixed race children with native and blacks.

    I say all the above, not due to some interest to keep the U.S multi-ethnic. I have no such interest, but an obligation to say the truth and help people recognize the impossibility of making the U.S mono-ethnic because this country has always been multi-ethnic for better or for worse.

    • Replies: @James Scott
  31. Polar says:

    The biggest problem with proposition nations is that no such thing exists. Every state is at least a soft ethnostate. The United States has been a Jewish ethnostate since at least December 23, 1913.

  32. Anonymous[418] • Disclaimer says:
    @follyofwar

    If nothing else, they need our tax money.

    For clarity’s sake be specific. “They” are not the impoverished racial minorities, “they” are the Zionist.

  33. KenH says:
    @Anonymous

    I came up with 25% because not all euro-americans people are race secessionist

    LOL. Given that America is still pretty segregated in neighborhoods and churches the majority of whites definitely are race secessionist but would never admit it because they suffer from cognitive dissonance. In most cases where races are integrated it’s by force, not by choice, so whites have resigned themselves to it. Blacks and browns follow whites everywhere, but whites can do little about it other than move away if they have the means.

    The land theft talking point is laughable considering virtually every nation on earth was founded by conquest and displacement of aboriginal peoples if you go back far enough. America is no exception. It’s especially laughable when America was just a landmass peopled by small bands of nomadic and semi-nomadic Indians who perpetually fought and enslaved each other. So it wasn’t a conquest and overthrow of an established nation and the enslavement of its population.

    The entire third world wants to live in America, so they clearly have no objection to the “land theft” that occurred in the 18th and 19th centuries.

    Let’s also not bullshit that many euro-americans don’t have roots that go back before 1900.

    And let’s also not bullshit that the vast majority of non-whites with the exception of most blacks and American Indians don’t have roots that go back before 1965, so they aren’t entitled to 75% of the square mileage.

    America is largely right of center between the east and west coasts, so the best option is to cede the vast majority of flyover America to whites to include Texas and Florida while you can have most of the coastal states. Then pro-whites can take 25% of that as an ethnostate. Blacks could have parts of the deep south like Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia as an ethnostate which would quickly devolve into Haiti and Detroit writ large.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  34. Anonymous[418] • Disclaimer says:
    @KenH

    Given that America is still pretty segregated in neighborhoods and churches the majority of whites definitely are race secessionist.

    There is a difference between wanting to live in non-ethnically diverse neighborhoods and wanting to live in a country that is 100% monoethnic. There would be a lot of euro-americans who would like to keep non-euros around. So many industries and universities have foreign grad students and engineers, although I personally oppose bringing in so many foreigners, there are plenty of euro-americans who benefit from it, without employers there wouldn’t be such demand for foreign labor. Even the historical view has the history of euro-americans literally importing by force non-euros and recruiting them to come here. The Spanish American war was literally about annexing a bunch of non-euros and refusing to give them independence, they wanted to leave and renounce all ties to the U.S but the euro-americans kept them in.

    The land theft talking point is laughable considering virtually every nation on earth was founded by conquest and displacement of aboriginal peoples if you go back far enough. America is no exception. It’s especially laughable when America was just a landmass peopled by small bands of nomadic and semi-nomadic Indians who perpetually fought and enslaved each other. So it wasn’t a conquest and overthrow of an established nation and the enslavement of its population.

    This is an argument for war of all against all. If that is what you want than just own up to wanting to take things that weren’t yours, but don’t expect sympathy.

    And let’s also not bullshit that the vast majority of non-whites with the exception of most blacks and American Indians don’t have roots that go back before 1965, so they aren’t entitled to 75% of the square mileage.

    Are you wanting to create an America with only people who have been here with roots here from before 1965 or are you wanting to create a euro-american ethnostate? Because the two are not the same. I brought up my previous point about the long history of non-europeans here and the short history of many Europeans here, to get you realize the difference between the two.

    There also seems to be a confusion. I am not proposing 75% of land for non-euro-americans only, I am proposing 75% of land for everyone, and for the euro-american separatists 25% of the land.

    • Replies: @KenH
  35. Polar: “[I] … will criticize people like this author who think that they are superior for being naive cowards that believe ZOG will allow them to peacefully vote their way out of being ethnically replaced.”

    Yes, it’s ludicrous. As Red Rosa Luxemburg said, if voting could change anything, it would be illegal.

    Greg Johnson evidently wants to undo and reverse the trend toward globalization, since mixing and trans-locating populations is part of that. Like flying to the moon by flapping your arms, it’s deceptively simple in concept, yet equally impossible. All we need to do, he says, is provide each people with a homeland and then get them to voluntarily move there. But the devil is in the details. What do you do if they refuse to go? Violence is off the table, according to Greg. So now what? Even if some agree, who pays for relocating them? What about foreign ownership of another nation’s real estate or corporations? The foreigners and racial aliens may not want to sell. Shall we then “make them an offer they can’t refuse”? That would be a good way to start a war, but Johnson says all of this must happen peacefully. How? And what about white ownership of vital, scarce resources in foreign countries that are crucial to our own self interest? Shall we permit that only to ourselves? Somehow I doubt other countries or races would think that is fair. This list of questions could be extended indefinitely, because a global economy truly is a Gordian knot, with everything intricately tied together in such a way as to be impossible to unravel. It would take, in essence, is a cultural and financial revolution; something that would change human nature as it has been since civilization began. People would have to value preserving race over their own individual success and pleasure. Not just pay it lip service, but actually suffer a great deal to achieve it. Further, they’d have to admit that they’ve been fools all along to think that races could actually get along together. Psychologically, it would be impossible. For whites, the Christian religion as it currently is interpreted by more than 99.9% of Christians would have to be tossed out along with its cultural residue, for Christianity has triumphed in the West to such an extent that even most atheists nowadays subscribe to Christian moral tenets such as the so-called brotherhood of man. Besides, if race is now the highest value, how could the worship of the racial Other proceed?

    Call me a pessimist, but I don’t see any of this happening. It would be easier to crash technological civilization completely than to attempt to revise it along these lines. Johnson’s plan of peaceful separation just won’t work.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  36. @Anonymous

    If whites are given a homeland in the USA the vast majority of whites would find an excuse to move there. The non white part would fast become a shit hole

  37. @Anonymous

    There are three races pf man. Negroid Caucasians and Asians
    Until 1965 the USA had laws keeping it Caucasian. This is a fact and your claim we are multi ethinic may be true but we were not multi racial.

  38. KenH says:
    @Anonymous

    There would be a lot of euro-americans who would like to keep non-euros around

    Well yes, you do have white industrialists who want non-Euros around as a cheap and compliant labor supply, but not because they think diversity is so enriching or because they wish to live by them or socially coexist with them as equals. These whites are like modern day plantation owners who will face a “slave revolt” by their non-white cheap laborers sooner or later.

    Euro-Americans also forcibly brought large numbers of their fellow whites to America in chains as indentured servants which was no picnic and the anti-white left is either ignorant of this fact or willfully ignores it since it doesn’t suit their historical narrative about villainous whites enslaving and victimizing innocent non-whites.

    This is an argument for war of all against all.

    No it is not and I’m not following your reasoning on this point. You seem to be arguing that since there were non-whites in America before some whites arrived that they are entitled to a large portion of the American landmass. The only people who could rightfully make that claim are the Amerindians and not the blacks or descendants of Chinese railroad workers who were brought to America by whites for slave and cheap labor purposes….not to enjoy citizenship. There were no native black or Chinese populations in what is now the USA or Canada before whites arrived in North America.

    Then you seem to be arguing that since America was founded by “land theft” that whites have no greater claim to the U.S. than any other racial group. If so, then that is a recipe for all against all and opens the door to a “might makes right” solution which would be very bad for everyone.

    It seems that you’re trying to rewrite history to suit your political worldview.

    At the end of the day 25% of the American landmass strictly for white people who take pride in their race and don’t hate themselves would be a great start, but it would only grow from there as whites in other areas of the nation become disaffected with the multiracial experiment and turn their portions of the nation into white ethnostates.

  39. peterAUS says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Good post.
    Especially:

    Johnson’s plan of peaceful separation just won’t work

    I am positive he knows that.

    Minor quibble:

    Psychologically, it would be impossible.

    Hard, but not impossible.

  40. @Jay Fink

    We could use more Jews like you. Most consider it somewhere between apostasy and traitorous behavior to consider themselves Americans first.

  41. A Former Alt-Right Member’s Message: Get Out While You Still Can
    https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/rosiegray/katie-mchugh

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Greg Johnson Comments via RSS