The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Robert Weissberg Archive
Transforming the Civil Rights Movement
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_379504663

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The passing of an era is barely noticed when it actually occurs. It’s hard to imagine millions waking up one morning and celebrating the arrival of the Age of Enlightenment let alone the birth of the Renaissance. A similar demarcation has occurred regarding the Civil Rights movement. To condense a long story, with the end of the Obama administration this movement has gone from one with a discernible, albeit somewhat contentious, agenda to a mishmash of foolish slogans and theatrical gestures that lack any ideological coherence.

The landmark Brown v. Board of Education (1954) was undoubtedly the beginning of the Modern Civil Rights movement. This movement sought—usually successfully– fairly specific objectives– court decrees to eliminate state-imposed racial segregation, the banning of racial discrimination in public accommodations and universities receiving public funding, equal access to the ballot (including measures to elect more blacks), compensatory programs for past injustices (e.g., affirmative action) and so on. Of the utmost importance, this agenda was directed by a few well-established organizations that provided a degree of reasonableness, even sanity to these demands. Yes, thousands of Detroit rioters might impart a sense of urgency to enacting a jobs program but the final outcome reflected the thinking of sensible lawyers and policy wonks.

This focus has largely vanished as “the movement” has become fragmented and thus no longer offers a clear-cut legislative/legal agenda. There is an impromptu, attention deficit disorder quality to today’s demands. The days when a few prominent leaders could energize the troops by imploring them to mobilize on behalf of a pending bill is long gone.

This even applied to long-established civil rights organization such as the NACCP. Its educational demands include the doomed-to-fail spending yet more public money on “needy” students, developing programs to award diplomas to everyone (yes, everyone) and eliminating zero tolerance discipline so as to keep kids in school. Also endorsed is multicultural education but it opposes charter schools. Regarding criminal justice, “The NAACP advocates for smarter, results-based criminal justice policies to keep our communities safe, including treatment for addiction and mental health problems, judicial discretion in sentencing, and an end to racial disparities at all levels of the system.” A similar loopy boilerplate is offered on healthcare: “This mission includes a focus on the right of African Americans and other people of color to have optimal health outcomes and access to timely, quality, affordable health care. African Americans continue to have the highest incidence, prevalence and mortality rates from chronic diseases like cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity, and issues like HIV/AIDS continue to overwhelm the Black community more so than any other racial or ethnic group.”

The Congressional Black Caucus likewise offers up a potpourri that continues to beat the dead horse of black voter suppression, their opposition to Trump reinstating the war on drugs, Trump’s opposition to affirmative action in higher education and his lack of enforcing civil rights laws. Throw in the Caucus’ call for eliminating private prisons and for reasons that are unclear, a condemnation of the administration’s anti-Islamic policies. The existence of statues of Confederate figures on federal property is also condemned along with a reference to expelling (unnamed) white supremacists from the White House.

The upshot of this vacuous hodge-podge is, predictably, a vacuum and into this vacuum flows a circus of racial entrepreneurs ever willing to profit from race-related incidents. After all, given today’s media appetite for “interesting” news, it takes little to certify oneself as a “racial spokesman” available to offer instant commentary on today’s attention-getting outage. How else can you explain the popularity of Maxine Waters (D-CA) other than her penchant for nutty sound bites?

A notable hotbed of this reality-challenged make-it-up-as-you-go-along mentality is, of course, today’s campus where even a hoax will trigger a media-worthy demonstration by outraged black students and their white social justice warrior allies. One website compiled a list of these demands in 2015 and among the most common were hiring more minority faculty, mandatory diversity training for all students, cultural centers exclusively for minority students, more mental health centers for black students and eliminating all racially offensive mascots and nicknames. More recently, protestors have shut down the speeches of alleged white racists such as Charles Murray, complained about cultural appropriations, micro-aggressions and rallied against the most mysterious and powerful force in the universe–white privilege .

No doubt, the preeminent example of this new black civil rights style is Black Lives Matter (BLM), a group lacking formal structures but specializing in holding up crude placards and shouting slogans such as “No Justice, No Peace.” Hard to imagine BLM having an elected president, a legal incorporation, a board of trustees, a dues-paying membership and all the rest that characterizes traditional groups such as the National Urban League. To be blunt, BLM is just a collection of angry blacks whose half-life is perhaps two years, at most.

But, more important for our purposes, are the bizarre nature of its demands. It recently released A Vision for Black Lives: Policy Demands for Black Power, Freedom and Justice,” a program put together—the group claims—by dozens of affiliated activists that consists of six core demands and 40 policy priorities: ending the war on black people, reparations for past and continuing harms, disinvestment from institutions that harm black people, economic justice and collective community ownership of economic resources, community control of laws, institutions and policies that impact the black community and, lastly, independent black political power and black self-determination in all areas of society. Additional proposals include the immediate release of all those people of color incarcerated for drug offenses, sex work-related and youth crimes, plus the demilitarization of the police and the end of systematic attacks on black youth. There’s more but this should suffice.

ORDER IT NOW

BLM is hardly alone in offering up hare-brained rhetoric somehow designed “to help blacks achieve equality.” Representative Al Green (D-Tex) just recently submitted articles of Impeachment to the House. This laundry list of alleged offenses included the President’s equivocating response to events in Charlottesville, Virginia, his assertion that President Obama had ordered a wiretap of Trump Tower, his claim regarding voter fraud in the 2016 election and, more generally, the accusation that President Trump had “undermined the integrity of his office” and “brought disrepute on the presidency.”

Lastly in this sampling are the grievances expressed by several National Football League players who refuse to stand during the national anthem. Despite all the attention given to this defiance, it’s unclear exactly what is being protested other than opposition to alleged police brutality and the unspecified injustices suffered by African Americans.

What explains the drift into often unreal if not bizarre incoherence? Most evidently, barely anything (perhaps nothing) in the old agenda works as intended and those policies that might, conceivably perform are either illegal, beyond reach or truly unspeakable. Now imagine if all possible proposals to end racial inequality were put in menu form and presented to government officials. But, next to each item would be a little notation, for example, an * or †. These would indicate “does not work,” “makes things worse,” or “is currently illegal” and let me suggest that the remaining options (if any) would be rather unappetizing, for example, sterilizing drug-addicted women. In other words, given past failures, civil rights advocates will lurch from one vague stupidity to the next since past proposals are either doomed to fail or pie in the sky.

The drift toward nuttiness is inevitable. Who would have predicted all the fuss about statues of Robert E. Lee or that professional football players could occupy center stage in a public discussion over racial inequality? Or that black actors would demand Oscars by racial quota? Moreover, the openness of American politics makes it crackpot friendly, a condition reinforced by a novelty obsessed mass media and the material rewards awaiting the next Al Sharpton. One might even argue that having an IQ exceeding 120 is a liability in attempting to join the “conversation on race.” The almost manic condemnation of President Trump as a white supremacist is but a harbinger of things to come and rest assured, there is nothing to stop this cacophony from getting even worse.

 
• Category: Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Black Lives Matter, Blacks, Civil Rights 
Hide 114 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Langley says:

    ‘African Americans continue to have the highest incidence, prevalence and mortality rates from chronic diseases like cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity, and issues like HIV/AIDS continue to overwhelm the Black community more so than any other racial or ethnic group.”

    The above are caused by behavior and genetics. Not Evil White Men.

    “Who would have predicted all the fuss about statues of Robert E. Lee or that professional football players could occupy center stage in a public discussion over racial inequality? Or that black actors would demand Oscars by racial quota? Moreover, the openness of American politics makes it crackpot friendly, a condition reinforced by a novelty obsessed mass media and the material rewards awaiting the next Al Sharpton.”

    William Luther Pierce?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    But don't ya know:

    "White folks was in the caves while we [blacks] was building empires … We built pyramids before Donald Trump ever knew what architecture was … we taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it."
    -- Al Sharpton

    , @Sin City Milla
    I think we should let blacks always go first through stop signs even if last to arrive. After all, letting the first to arrive go first is just White Privilege. This won't be too much of a problem. At every stop sign the drivers can exit their vehicles, categorize each other by race by measuring their respective degrees of melanin, peacefully conclude who should go through the stop sign first, then calmly proceed in the correct order. After all, this merely applies the logic of affirmative action, dictated by our enlightened n unbiased Supreme Court. This approach has worked so well in academia n business for the 60 years that the Court in its wisdom has decided to make it permanent. Only white racists could possibly object.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /article/transforming-the-civil-rights-movement/#comment-2046295
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. If cognitive is ray-ciss, why is every application at the VA and beyond headed by a blank to check for your race?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. vx37 says:

    Black people are simply incapable of building or maintaining an advanced modern society. Doesn’t necessarily make them bad people, but it is what it is. The real core of “Civil Rights” wasn’t about voting rights or school desegregation, it was about taxing whites to lift blacks above their abilities into a semblance of First World lives. Blacks living at their natural level within a First World nation was embarrassing to the elite, particularly after they began seeing themselves first and foremost as players on the imperial world stage.

    This game could have gone on for a long time but the powers that be decided to import a mass of third-worlders who, to a somewhat lesser degree than blacks, also have to be subsidized to bring them up to First World standards. As this mass grows there won’t be enough money to continue the program. Too much tick and not enough dog. And as whites become a hated minority in their former homeland there’s a chance that they will come to see the program as the hatred, robbery, and oppression that it always was and politically revolt against it. It’s this sense of decline, of the system falling apart, of the cash cow starting to wobble, that is responsible for the shrieking hysteria among “Civil Rights” activists. They had the chance to prove themselves and they have failed. Now their political efforts are being exposed as nothing more than naked sponging that will have to be ramped up to (unsuccessfully in the long run) compete for a share of the declining pie.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    In EVERY instance where blacks are in great numbers, control the governments of cities, counties, regions, states, countries, & continents we ALWAYS see:
    massive murder rates
    massive crime in general
    degraded property
    massive disease, especially STDs
    massive drug abuse
    general filth, squalor
    massive, unable to support their own children, birthrates
    massive youth pregnancies rates
    massive school dropout rates
    incredibly low IQs & test scores
    violence as a way of life
    fathers nowhere to be found
    , @Robert Weissberg
    Absolutely correct. Third world folk cannot understand the concept of the golden goose. They think that their loots is forever. The eternal EBT card.
    , @MBlanc46
    That first paragraph is pure gold. Blacks used to be (mostly) productive citizens. Recognizing their cognitive limitations, we might have made a greater effort to raise their standard of living. Instead, we accepted the dogma of racial equality, automated many of the jobs that blacks used to do, and imported a mass of the Third Worlders to do even more of those jobs.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding.

    Read More
    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding."

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Brabantian says: • Website

    What’s missing from the multiple good points made in this article, is the fact that the progressive / leftist incoherence and chaos, is quite oligarch-orchestrated … as are, e.g., the injustices of the system which are indeed unfairly jailing many minorities for non-violent crimes, plus railroading many minorities into prison via a totally skewered prosecutorial – legal system … this is not to deny the levels of minority crime, but to point out that the oligarchs have purposefully created a ‘justice’ system which is an utter farce and in which tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands, are coerced into ‘plea bargains’ for crimes they personally did not commit

    Chaos and injustice are the oligarch agenda, and the oligarchs’ media arms specifically sponsor this as much as the rigged and corrupt United States courts and lawyers … it is the crazy, corrupt, messed-up organisations which get the media support and funding sponsorship, and that is a core aspect of the game … set the lower classes against one another, and forever distract from the oligarchs pulling the strings behind the scenes

    It is not a simple matter to address the real problem … It is hard for most people to digest what is happening, as they are suffering from in-your-face ugly serious life issues, whereas the oligarch string-pullers are distant, hidden and ‘theoretical’ … versus the street crime in your face, or your minority family member or friend getting railroaded and jailed

    Read More
    • Replies: @animalogic
    Spot on Brabatian: "divide & rule" , page 1 of the Elites playbook.
    , @utu
    What’s missing from the multiple good points made in this article

    Chaos and injustice are the oligarch agenda

    One would think that the author would put two and two together by now. Is he a fiddle or the one who plays it?
    , @Alden
    It’s so obvious you know absolutely nothing about crime, criminals and the criminal justice system other than what you read is some naive pro criminal publication by some lying liberal.

    You don’t even know what plea bargain means do you? Almost all crimes committed are not just one crime but at least 2 usually more than 2 crimes.

    For instance a basic robbery often involves a weapon and a physical attack on the victim which injures the victim. A huge number of rapes happen after the criminal has broken and entered and invaded the victim’s home.

    So the criminal is charged with the several crimes he committed. The criminal then admits guilt of the least serious crime

    Thus instead of getting what he actually deserves, a lengthy sentence for armed robbery with a weapon and serious bodily injury to the victim, the criminal admits guilt only to simple robbery and gets probation and a very short sentence such as one year. Another thing you don’t know about is “ time off for good behavior”
    That means that every prison sentence is automatically cut in half unless the criminal Jill’s someone in prison and has to serve his full sentence.
    You’ve obviously been reading some liberal falsehoods about plea bargains written by a pro criminal ideologue

    Murder 1 often becomes man slaughter or even involuntary manslaughter. A well known case Re that is going on right now in San Francisco. The illegal alien felon who murdered Kate Stienle claims he just sat down on a bench. A gun was just lying there. He just touched the gun and the gun went off by itself killing Ms Stienle.

    The murderer claims involuntary manslaughter. But it was really homicide 2.

    You really should look to the source of what you read. If you’re in law school, 6 months as a public defender will cure you of your naive and ignorant beliefs about plea bargains.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Let me make a provocative argument:

    The young generation of NAMs and white/Asian SJWs given what they’ve been taught and what every elite institution repeatedly tells them are perfectly correct in being angry at the current situation and demanding much more aggressive policies to bring NAM achievement and living standards up to those of whites.

    Let’s consider what this society preaches as gospel.

    1. Blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, gays, etc., and, to a degree, white women are being held back in a variety of ways by white (mostly male) racism – both current and historic and both conscious and unconscious.

    2. This racism not only leads to lower living standards, it leads to NAM deaths in the form of increased crime levels (which are ultimately the long-term result of white racism though the actual killing is done by NAMs because of the difficult condition in which they are raised – conditions caused by white racism) and (white) police brutality. People of color are literally dying because of white racism!

    3. Despite 50+ years of government policies, affirmative action and diversity training in schools and corporations, whites (again, usually men) simply refuse to give up their racism. The proof can be seen in the continued underperformance and high crime rates of NAMs, particularly blacks. Since we know that race is a social construct and all peoples are identically capable and no more or less violent than one another, the only cause can white racism.

    4. Despite the failure of these policies, the leading politicians from both parties (usually white) and other leaders of society (academia, business, media, etc.) refuse to consider more aggressive tactics to get whites to give up their racism. The old guard is sitting on its hands while PoC die!

    5. Policies to solve white racism must become as aggressive as needed to end white racism, which is holding down millions of people of color and causing the deaths of thousands every year. Does destroying statutes compare to thousands of black deaths every year? No. Does beating a few white racists compare to thousands of black deaths every year? No. Does silencing the allies of white racists compare to thousands of black deaths every year? No.

    As you can see, once you assume that millions of NAMs are being forced to live in poverty or near poverty and thousands of blacks and Hispanics are being killed every year due to white racism, there are almost no limits on your policies to stop white racism. Confiscation of property. No problem. Beatings of whites. No problem. Killing a few whites. Regrettable, but so long as the numbers are lower than the number of blacks being killed each year, acceptable.

    If you believe what literally everyone in society has told you since birth – that white racism is causing untold pain in society – you would be justified in some pretty damn aggressive tactics to end it.

    This will not end well because no one is going to tell the truth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Michelle
    Beautifully stated, Sir.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. Issac says:

    “Who would have predicted all the fuss about statues of Robert E. Lee or that professional football players could occupy center stage in a public discussion over racial inequality?”

    Anyone with more than trivial exposure to black communities. Civil rights would be rolled back tomorrow if the gilded liberals who defend them were made to live within walking distance.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    At least some of the gilded liberals do live within walking distance, in places such as Hyde Park, Chicago; Morningside Heights, NYC; and New Haven. They do see black behavior first hand, yet they still refuse to see it.
    , @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    Disingenuous white liberals and sanctimonious white conservatives love blacks and the further away they live, the more they love them.

    I once remarked to a Jewish friend that one of the reasons why Jews tend to be liberal is because they tend to be affluent and so can escape the consequences of their purported idealism. She agreed with me.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Wally says:
    @vx37
    Black people are simply incapable of building or maintaining an advanced modern society. Doesn't necessarily make them bad people, but it is what it is. The real core of "Civil Rights" wasn't about voting rights or school desegregation, it was about taxing whites to lift blacks above their abilities into a semblance of First World lives. Blacks living at their natural level within a First World nation was embarrassing to the elite, particularly after they began seeing themselves first and foremost as players on the imperial world stage.

    This game could have gone on for a long time but the powers that be decided to import a mass of third-worlders who, to a somewhat lesser degree than blacks, also have to be subsidized to bring them up to First World standards. As this mass grows there won't be enough money to continue the program. Too much tick and not enough dog. And as whites become a hated minority in their former homeland there's a chance that they will come to see the program as the hatred, robbery, and oppression that it always was and politically revolt against it. It's this sense of decline, of the system falling apart, of the cash cow starting to wobble, that is responsible for the shrieking hysteria among "Civil Rights" activists. They had the chance to prove themselves and they have failed. Now their political efforts are being exposed as nothing more than naked sponging that will have to be ramped up to (unsuccessfully in the long run) compete for a share of the declining pie.

    In EVERY instance where blacks are in great numbers, control the governments of cities, counties, regions, states, countries, & continents we ALWAYS see:
    massive murder rates
    massive crime in general
    degraded property
    massive disease, especially STDs
    massive drug abuse
    general filth, squalor
    massive, unable to support their own children, birthrates
    massive youth pregnancies rates
    massive school dropout rates
    incredibly low IQs & test scores
    violence as a way of life
    fathers nowhere to be found

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    There are countries in Sub-Saharan Africa with lower crime rates than some countries in Europe. How many of those would be required for you to admit that you're wrong?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Corvinus says:
    @Diversity Heretic
    The genuine objective of the "Civil Rights Movement" was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding.

    “The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding.”

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated “separate but equal” as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Langley
    Stop hating on Southerners.

    You Yankees were the same.

    http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.com/2017/07/segregation-our-most-cherished-myths.html
    , @Joe Franklin
    The so-called civil rights movement was invented to promote unconstitutional federal group rights for delusional victim culture people.

    Democrats and neocons love this scheme because it enables them to reliably buy the votes of the ignorant American majority.

    Democrats and neocons are fond of this scheme so much that they've invented a euphemism to sell it to the ignorant public: diversity and inclusion.

    .................................................................................................................................................................

    Feminist are entitled by law because of assumed Male oppression
    Jewish are entitled by law because of assumed Gentile oppression
    Sodomites are entitled by law because of assumed Straight oppression
    Elective Abortionist are entitled by law because of assumed Innocent Life Advocate oppression
    Muslims are entitled by law because of assumed Christian oppression
    Disabled are entitled by law because of assumed Healthy oppression
    Afro-blacks are entitled by law because of assumed White oppression
    Latinos are entitled by law because of assumed Gringo oppression
    Hispanics are entitled by law because of assumed Gringo oppression
    Military Veterans are entitled by law because of assumed Militia oppression
    Native Americans are entitled by law because of assumed Paleface oppression
    Asians are entitled by law because of assumed Occidental oppression
    International Socialist are entitled by law because of assumed Local Government oppression
    Social Justice Crony Capitalist are entitled by law because of assumed Honest Businessmen oppression
    Zionist-Neocons are entitled by law because of assumed Anti-Fascist oppression
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That's not allowing people to live freely. It's the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn.

    How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans? Again, not exactly your libertarian, we-are-the-world Coke commercial philosophy.

    Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There's a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s.

    Finally, even assuming that it's not just a racial shake-down (a laughable assumption), the "Civil Rights" movement of today is based on two incorrect assumptions: 1) All groups are equally capable genetically and 2) every culture - which, of course, grows out of biology anyway - is equally good at producing achievement. As a result, all civil rights policies are based on disparate impact, i.e. any differences in group achievements are prima facie evidence of racism.

    The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter.

    As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement. You argue that this is fine, "Let everyone live where they want and be friends with whom they want" is your manta, curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one's people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals.

    But the Civil Rights movement doesn't believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy.

    If you don't understand this, you are a fool. If you do, you are a liar. Which is it?
    , @Wally
    Is that why black dysfunction & ignorance is greater than ever .... in spite of billions & billions of white dollars, preferences, set-asides, 'affirmative action', being thrown at it?

    You must have voted for Hillary.

    , @hyperbola
    Oh really? Then why are members of a certain racist-supremacist, mideast sect tgetting rich off the "civil rights movement"?

    SPLC transferring millions to offshore tax havens: Report
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/1/splc-transferred-millions-offshore-tax-havens/

    Exposing the Southern Poverty Law Center, Part III: Corrupt Connections
    http://www.resistancemedia.org/2017/05/exposing-southern-poverty-law-center.html
    , @Sin City Milla
    "Pursuing black equal rights" is nothing but a delusion of the uninformed imperial elitists of Washington n the northeast, n always has been. Whites in the south, n in the working classes of the rest of the US, have always had to defend tbemselves from a steady onslaught of black crime that the elite controlled media have always attempted to suppress.

    Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor's 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison.

    Most of these are not reported because everyone knows its a waste of time n the accused will soon just be back on the street. This is the permanent state of siege that the elites in Washington have forced on the south n on the white working class in this country n which the media actively silences. We know that the government is alien n useless n that we have no defense but our own guns. If it weren't for blacks, we would have almost no violent crime at all.

    Now that you are now better informed than before, maybe you can re-evaluate your opinions.
    , @Alden
    Blacks always had equal rights in Ohio, Michigan, New York, Illinois. Wisconsin, California and other states north of the Mason Dixon line.

    And look what they did to vast sections of NYC, Akron, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Gary, Chicago, Milwaukee and even Kenosha and Waukegan, Los Angeles, Sacramento and San Francisco.

    Sometimes it took 20 years, sometimes only 10 years before blacks totally destroyed vast sections of those cities. But never more than 20 years.

    I read your arguments in my parents library 60 years ago and got the full propaganda blast in a few college courses. Lucky for me, in the olden days only required sociology and a few other courses taught by commie profs were pro black anti White propaganda.

    Your argument is as old as I am. And it’s all liberal propaganda falsehoods.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. wayfarer says:

    “Illegal Immigration Hurts Black Men Most”

    “Immigrants Steal African-Americans’ 14th Amendment ‘Birthright’ “

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    It’s true that the anchor babies stole the equal rights of Americans.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Marc Faber spilled a whole kettle of race-realist beans today and got himself permanently booted off television. The truth is coming out and the efforts at repression are losing their force.

    “And thank God white people populated America, and not the blacks. Otherwise, the US would look like Zimbabwe, which it might look like one day anyway, but at least America enjoyed 200 years in the economic and political sun under a white majority.”

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-17/sprott-demand-marc-fabers-resignation-after-racist-diatribe

    Read More
    • Agree: Realist
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. @Brabantian
    What's missing from the multiple good points made in this article, is the fact that the progressive / leftist incoherence and chaos, is quite oligarch-orchestrated ... as are, e.g., the injustices of the system which are indeed unfairly jailing many minorities for non-violent crimes, plus railroading many minorities into prison via a totally skewered prosecutorial - legal system ... this is not to deny the levels of minority crime, but to point out that the oligarchs have purposefully created a 'justice' system which is an utter farce and in which tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands, are coerced into 'plea bargains' for crimes they personally did not commit

    Chaos and injustice are the oligarch agenda, and the oligarchs' media arms specifically sponsor this as much as the rigged and corrupt United States courts and lawyers ... it is the crazy, corrupt, messed-up organisations which get the media support and funding sponsorship, and that is a core aspect of the game ... set the lower classes against one another, and forever distract from the oligarchs pulling the strings behind the scenes

    It is not a simple matter to address the real problem ... It is hard for most people to digest what is happening, as they are suffering from in-your-face ugly serious life issues, whereas the oligarch string-pullers are distant, hidden and 'theoretical' ... versus the street crime in your face, or your minority family member or friend getting railroaded and jailed

    Spot on Brabatian: “divide & rule” , page 1 of the Elites playbook.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. utu says:
    @Brabantian
    What's missing from the multiple good points made in this article, is the fact that the progressive / leftist incoherence and chaos, is quite oligarch-orchestrated ... as are, e.g., the injustices of the system which are indeed unfairly jailing many minorities for non-violent crimes, plus railroading many minorities into prison via a totally skewered prosecutorial - legal system ... this is not to deny the levels of minority crime, but to point out that the oligarchs have purposefully created a 'justice' system which is an utter farce and in which tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands, are coerced into 'plea bargains' for crimes they personally did not commit

    Chaos and injustice are the oligarch agenda, and the oligarchs' media arms specifically sponsor this as much as the rigged and corrupt United States courts and lawyers ... it is the crazy, corrupt, messed-up organisations which get the media support and funding sponsorship, and that is a core aspect of the game ... set the lower classes against one another, and forever distract from the oligarchs pulling the strings behind the scenes

    It is not a simple matter to address the real problem ... It is hard for most people to digest what is happening, as they are suffering from in-your-face ugly serious life issues, whereas the oligarch string-pullers are distant, hidden and 'theoretical' ... versus the street crime in your face, or your minority family member or friend getting railroaded and jailed

    What’s missing from the multiple good points made in this article

    Chaos and injustice are the oligarch agenda

    One would think that the author would put two and two together by now. Is he a fiddle or the one who plays it?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Langley says:
    @Corvinus
    "The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding."

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.

    Stop hating on Southerners.

    You Yankees were the same.

    http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.com/2017/07/segregation-our-most-cherished-myths.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    On a previous thread on unz.com, I made people aware of one "Yankee Imperialist" who made several important counterpoints. I would advise that you take his/her perspective seriously.

    "Stop hating on Southerners."

    There is an observable difference between southrons and Southerners, Yankees and northerners.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. Hellifornia

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  17. @Corvinus
    "The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding."

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.

    The so-called civil rights movement was invented to promote unconstitutional federal group rights for delusional victim culture people.

    Democrats and neocons love this scheme because it enables them to reliably buy the votes of the ignorant American majority.

    Democrats and neocons are fond of this scheme so much that they’ve invented a euphemism to sell it to the ignorant public: diversity and inclusion.

    [MORE]

    ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

    Feminist are entitled by law because of assumed Male oppression
    Jewish are entitled by law because of assumed Gentile oppression
    Sodomites are entitled by law because of assumed Straight oppression
    Elective Abortionist are entitled by law because of assumed Innocent Life Advocate oppression
    Muslims are entitled by law because of assumed Christian oppression
    Disabled are entitled by law because of assumed Healthy oppression
    Afro-blacks are entitled by law because of assumed White oppression
    Latinos are entitled by law because of assumed Gringo oppression
    Hispanics are entitled by law because of assumed Gringo oppression
    Military Veterans are entitled by law because of assumed Militia oppression
    Native Americans are entitled by law because of assumed Paleface oppression
    Asians are entitled by law because of assumed Occidental oppression
    International Socialist are entitled by law because of assumed Local Government oppression
    Social Justice Crony Capitalist are entitled by law because of assumed Honest Businessmen oppression
    Zionist-Neocons are entitled by law because of assumed Anti-Fascist oppression

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "The so-called civil rights movement was invented to promote unconstitutional federal group rights for delusional victim culture people."

    Corrected for accuracy --> The civil rights movement bore witness to several groups of people who fought for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness because several rights found in the Constitution were perpetually violated by federal, state, and local officials.

    "Democrats and neocons love this scheme because it enables them to reliably buy the votes of the ignorant American majority."

    This "ignorant American majority" is white. Why are you denigrating your own kind? What makes YOU other than ignorant compared to your brethren?

    "Democrats and neocons are fond of this scheme so much that they’ve invented a euphemism to sell it to the ignorant public: diversity and inclusion."

    Diversity and inclusion is a feature, not a bug, of the United States since its inception.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. I’m all for reparations on the condition that it comes with a one-way ticket back to the Dark Continent. If we offer $250k to all volunteers, and if 20m of the 39m African-Americans take the deal, it will only cost us $5 trillion. I know that might sound like a lot, but the takers would likely be those most likely to be malcontents and non-contributors, so think of the longer-term savings on things like social-welfare spending, affirmative action subsidies, prisons, and the costs of crime.

    Now that I reflect on it, make that $1m per taker. Let’s make sure they can live like kings somewhere else.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  20. @Corvinus
    "The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding."

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.

    So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That’s not allowing people to live freely. It’s the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn.

    How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans? Again, not exactly your libertarian, we-are-the-world Coke commercial philosophy.

    Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There’s a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s.

    Finally, even assuming that it’s not just a racial shake-down (a laughable assumption), the “Civil Rights” movement of today is based on two incorrect assumptions: 1) All groups are equally capable genetically and 2) every culture – which, of course, grows out of biology anyway – is equally good at producing achievement. As a result, all civil rights policies are based on disparate impact, i.e. any differences in group achievements are prima facie evidence of racism.

    The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter.

    As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement. You argue that this is fine, “Let everyone live where they want and be friends with whom they want” is your manta, curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one’s people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals.

    But the Civil Rights movement doesn’t believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy.

    If you don’t understand this, you are a fool. If you do, you are a liar. Which is it?

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    Well stated.

    But I'm afraid you'll never disturb the locked down thoughts of Corvinus, who may be an adroit troll keeping track of how many replies his/her clichéd comments attract. A much more skilled Tiny Duck.

    , @Corvinus
    "So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That’s not allowing people to live freely. It’s the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn."

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the "good old days".

    "How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans?"

    **From the National Review, January 13, 2016….

    **Having previously accepted HUD funding through the Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) program, as well as HUD’s Community Development Block Grant program, Dubuque was formally obligated to “affirmatively further fair housing” in whatever way HUD defined that obligation.**

    Interesting. Dubuque willingly chose to take federal government funding for this particular program. Therefore, this city, fair or unfair, right or wrong, put itself in a position to abide by those rules.

    **Refusal to submit to HUD’s dictates would have led to the withdrawal of federal funding, a lawsuit for supposed discrimination, or both.**

    Lesson learned–do not accept federal funding lest one be subject to their regulations and "purposely" place blacks in white neighborhoods.

    **The cowed elected officials of Dubuque accordingly signed a “voluntary” (in truth, forced) consent agreement that effectively ceded control of the city’s housing policy to HUD for at least five years.**

    Again, the officials there completely understood that when they received federal money, they would be subject to stipulations. There was no “force” employed here. I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

    "Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There’s a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s."

    I am quite aware of northern de facto segregation. However, I am also old enough to remember when there were white families who sold their homes to non-white families, and while there were initial problems, those issues were addressed. And, of course, northern cities are "still livable for white families".

    "1) All groups are equally capable genetically".

    All people have the capability of being successful. Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.

    "2) every culture – which, of course, grows out of biology anyway – is equally good at producing achievement."

    Certainly, over the past two 200,000 years, people have developed new survival related cultural skills and technologies at a faster rate than natural selection could alter our bodies to adapt to those environmental challenges. So cultural evolution has shown to be faster than biological evolution, which has significantly modified the effect of natural selection on humans. However, there is a false perception that one culture is "better" than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

    "The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter."

    Of course the Civil Rights Movement was about equality of opportunity, considering Jim Crow laws denied opportunities for only a certain group of people. Is there an argument to be made that today's laws have leaned toward "equality of outcome"? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we "roll back" legislation to the "good old days" at the expense of liberty.

    "As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement."

    Refresh my memory as to exactly how I made this assertion and/or agree specifically with this assessment.

    "...curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one’s people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals."

    For SOME whites and non-whites, tribe and loyalty is important. You overstate the case.

    "But the Civil Rights movement doesn’t believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy."

    Assuming that there are these "genetic differences" in capability.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Truth says:

    (Yawn…) Another article by a slave who’s paid to spy on the other slaves. What else is new?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That's not allowing people to live freely. It's the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn.

    How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans? Again, not exactly your libertarian, we-are-the-world Coke commercial philosophy.

    Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There's a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s.

    Finally, even assuming that it's not just a racial shake-down (a laughable assumption), the "Civil Rights" movement of today is based on two incorrect assumptions: 1) All groups are equally capable genetically and 2) every culture - which, of course, grows out of biology anyway - is equally good at producing achievement. As a result, all civil rights policies are based on disparate impact, i.e. any differences in group achievements are prima facie evidence of racism.

    The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter.

    As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement. You argue that this is fine, "Let everyone live where they want and be friends with whom they want" is your manta, curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one's people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals.

    But the Civil Rights movement doesn't believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy.

    If you don't understand this, you are a fool. If you do, you are a liar. Which is it?

    Well stated.

    But I’m afraid you’ll never disturb the locked down thoughts of Corvinus, who may be an adroit troll keeping track of how many replies his/her clichéd comments attract. A much more skilled Tiny Duck.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Yeah, I figure that's exactly what he is. (I remember a few weeks back, he got surprisingly upset about an attack on Jewish influence. Interesting.) That's why I usually like to call him "the actor that plays Corvinus."

    Regardless, his comments while robotic and simple-minded need to be rebuffed occasionally for the uninformed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. Jake says:

    The Civil Rights movement always featured a strong dose of shake down con artistry. More troubling, back to at least the ‘Gay 90s’ (1890s), white sexual adventurists with money used blacks as their excuse to advocate for sexual revolution.

    You cannot separate black civil rights from sexual revolution.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    ...Muh Dyk.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. Corvinus says:
    @Langley
    Stop hating on Southerners.

    You Yankees were the same.

    http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.com/2017/07/segregation-our-most-cherished-myths.html

    On a previous thread on unz.com, I made people aware of one “Yankee Imperialist” who made several important counterpoints. I would advise that you take his/her perspective seriously.

    “Stop hating on Southerners.”

    There is an observable difference between southrons and Southerners, Yankees and northerners.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Corvinus says:
    @Joe Franklin
    The so-called civil rights movement was invented to promote unconstitutional federal group rights for delusional victim culture people.

    Democrats and neocons love this scheme because it enables them to reliably buy the votes of the ignorant American majority.

    Democrats and neocons are fond of this scheme so much that they've invented a euphemism to sell it to the ignorant public: diversity and inclusion.

    .................................................................................................................................................................

    Feminist are entitled by law because of assumed Male oppression
    Jewish are entitled by law because of assumed Gentile oppression
    Sodomites are entitled by law because of assumed Straight oppression
    Elective Abortionist are entitled by law because of assumed Innocent Life Advocate oppression
    Muslims are entitled by law because of assumed Christian oppression
    Disabled are entitled by law because of assumed Healthy oppression
    Afro-blacks are entitled by law because of assumed White oppression
    Latinos are entitled by law because of assumed Gringo oppression
    Hispanics are entitled by law because of assumed Gringo oppression
    Military Veterans are entitled by law because of assumed Militia oppression
    Native Americans are entitled by law because of assumed Paleface oppression
    Asians are entitled by law because of assumed Occidental oppression
    International Socialist are entitled by law because of assumed Local Government oppression
    Social Justice Crony Capitalist are entitled by law because of assumed Honest Businessmen oppression
    Zionist-Neocons are entitled by law because of assumed Anti-Fascist oppression

    “The so-called civil rights movement was invented to promote unconstitutional federal group rights for delusional victim culture people.”

    Corrected for accuracy –> The civil rights movement bore witness to several groups of people who fought for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness because several rights found in the Constitution were perpetually violated by federal, state, and local officials.

    “Democrats and neocons love this scheme because it enables them to reliably buy the votes of the ignorant American majority.”

    This “ignorant American majority” is white. Why are you denigrating your own kind? What makes YOU other than ignorant compared to your brethren?

    “Democrats and neocons are fond of this scheme so much that they’ve invented a euphemism to sell it to the ignorant public: diversity and inclusion.”

    Diversity and inclusion is a feature, not a bug, of the United States since its inception.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    See #22.

    This is a game for you, isn't it? And do replies like mine count?
    , @Joe Franklin
    The diversity scheme has always been dominated by white people, especially white queers, Jews, Zionist, and Feminist.

    Unconstitutional features are still unconstitutional.

    Your kind, the BLM and Antifa and Neocon style thugs, are violent hypocrites that endlessly demand more federal entitlements because you are smarmy, shameless criminals.

    The world is a big place, and your kind is free to leave and establish a totalitarian victim cult entitlement utopia elsewhere.

    US is not a democracy, it's a constitutional republic.

    Understand it as a fact, live by it, or be gone.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "The so-called civil rights movement was invented to promote unconstitutional federal group rights for delusional victim culture people."

    Corrected for accuracy --> The civil rights movement bore witness to several groups of people who fought for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness because several rights found in the Constitution were perpetually violated by federal, state, and local officials.

    "Democrats and neocons love this scheme because it enables them to reliably buy the votes of the ignorant American majority."

    This "ignorant American majority" is white. Why are you denigrating your own kind? What makes YOU other than ignorant compared to your brethren?

    "Democrats and neocons are fond of this scheme so much that they’ve invented a euphemism to sell it to the ignorant public: diversity and inclusion."

    Diversity and inclusion is a feature, not a bug, of the United States since its inception.

    See #22.

    This is a game for you, isn’t it? And do replies like mine count?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    In EVERY instance where blacks are in great numbers, control the governments of cities, counties, regions, states, countries, & continents we ALWAYS see:
    massive murder rates
    massive crime in general
    degraded property
    massive disease, especially STDs
    massive drug abuse
    general filth, squalor
    massive, unable to support their own children, birthrates
    massive youth pregnancies rates
    massive school dropout rates
    incredibly low IQs & test scores
    violence as a way of life
    fathers nowhere to be found

    There are countries in Sub-Saharan Africa with lower crime rates than some countries in Europe. How many of those would be required for you to admit that you’re wrong?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Really?

    Your proof is where?
    , @Jim
    Official statistics from Sub-Saharan countries are unreliable.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. Corvinus says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That's not allowing people to live freely. It's the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn.

    How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans? Again, not exactly your libertarian, we-are-the-world Coke commercial philosophy.

    Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There's a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s.

    Finally, even assuming that it's not just a racial shake-down (a laughable assumption), the "Civil Rights" movement of today is based on two incorrect assumptions: 1) All groups are equally capable genetically and 2) every culture - which, of course, grows out of biology anyway - is equally good at producing achievement. As a result, all civil rights policies are based on disparate impact, i.e. any differences in group achievements are prima facie evidence of racism.

    The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter.

    As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement. You argue that this is fine, "Let everyone live where they want and be friends with whom they want" is your manta, curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one's people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals.

    But the Civil Rights movement doesn't believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy.

    If you don't understand this, you are a fool. If you do, you are a liar. Which is it?

    “So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That’s not allowing people to live freely. It’s the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn.”

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the “good old days”.

    “How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans?”

    **From the National Review, January 13, 2016….

    **Having previously accepted HUD funding through the Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) program, as well as HUD’s Community Development Block Grant program, Dubuque was formally obligated to “affirmatively further fair housing” in whatever way HUD defined that obligation.**

    Interesting. Dubuque willingly chose to take federal government funding for this particular program. Therefore, this city, fair or unfair, right or wrong, put itself in a position to abide by those rules.

    **Refusal to submit to HUD’s dictates would have led to the withdrawal of federal funding, a lawsuit for supposed discrimination, or both.**

    Lesson learned–do not accept federal funding lest one be subject to their regulations and “purposely” place blacks in white neighborhoods.

    **The cowed elected officials of Dubuque accordingly signed a “voluntary” (in truth, forced) consent agreement that effectively ceded control of the city’s housing policy to HUD for at least five years.**

    Again, the officials there completely understood that when they received federal money, they would be subject to stipulations. There was no “force” employed here. I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

    “Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There’s a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s.”

    I am quite aware of northern de facto segregation. However, I am also old enough to remember when there were white families who sold their homes to non-white families, and while there were initial problems, those issues were addressed. And, of course, northern cities are “still livable for white families”.

    “1) All groups are equally capable genetically”.

    All people have the capability of being successful. Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.

    “2) every culture – which, of course, grows out of biology anyway – is equally good at producing achievement.”

    Certainly, over the past two 200,000 years, people have developed new survival related cultural skills and technologies at a faster rate than natural selection could alter our bodies to adapt to those environmental challenges. So cultural evolution has shown to be faster than biological evolution, which has significantly modified the effect of natural selection on humans. However, there is a false perception that one culture is “better” than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

    “The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter.”

    Of course the Civil Rights Movement was about equality of opportunity, considering Jim Crow laws denied opportunities for only a certain group of people. Is there an argument to be made that today’s laws have leaned toward “equality of outcome”? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.

    “As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement.”

    Refresh my memory as to exactly how I made this assertion and/or agree specifically with this assessment.

    “…curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one’s people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals.”

    For SOME whites and non-whites, tribe and loyalty is important. You overstate the case.

    “But the Civil Rights movement doesn’t believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy.”

    Assuming that there are these “genetic differences” in capability.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    OK, I’ll play:

    “However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.”

    Which groups? Exactly what legislation? And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?

    , @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the “good old days”.
     
    So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block "white racism."

    A few "warts", eh. You sound like Walter Durant defending Stalin. Gotta break a few eggs to stop those white racists.

    I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

     

    We're learning. Wait until we figure out that violence works as well. Just kidding. ;)

    And, of course, northern cities are “still livable for white families”.
     
    Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to "northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school.

    You sure are a useful tool for the rich. Curious.

    All people have the capability of being successful.
     
    First, I was talking average differences among groups. You deceitfully try to make it a question about individuals. You are a very disingenuous person and debater. It's unfortunate - and utterly predictable.

    Regardless, you are simply wrong. Blacks as a group cannot be as successful at creating and maintaining a modern civilization as whites and Asians. They simply don't have enough of a smart fraction. It's unfortunate and not their fault. But it is reality.

    Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground.

    So, no not all people - as in a race - are equally capable. If they were, we'd have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don't.

    Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.
     
    When did I ever say that group differences were 100% genetic. Indeed, I mentioned several times that culture/environment is important. Probably a 50-50 split.

    Why do you lie about what I said.

    The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren't that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics.

    Why can't you acknowledge that genetics matter with average group differences and that those difference matter in outcomes? To continually deny this is embarrassing for you.

    However, there is a false perception that one culture is “better” than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

     

    Some culture are "better" at achieving certain outcomes. Doesn't make them better in a general sense but it does make them better at some things, and if those things make for a wealthier or safer society on average, than you have to accept that.

    And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work. Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology. They act on each other but changing the biology via cultural pressure takes a very, very long time.

    Is there an argument to be made that today’s laws have leaned toward “equality of outcome”? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.

     

    So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism. And the proof of that racism is the underachievement of NAMs. And since you refuse to acknowledge that the NAM underachievement is caused - at least in part - by genetic differences, you will continue to use that NAM underachievement as proof of white racism. (See Tautology.)

    This proof will allow you to enforce ever more draconian policies against whites.

    Thank you Corvinus for finally showing your true colors.

    You are anti-science and will stand behind those who unfairly punish innocent whites - and Asians.

    You are a liar who twists words to achieve a simple goal.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. @vx37
    Black people are simply incapable of building or maintaining an advanced modern society. Doesn't necessarily make them bad people, but it is what it is. The real core of "Civil Rights" wasn't about voting rights or school desegregation, it was about taxing whites to lift blacks above their abilities into a semblance of First World lives. Blacks living at their natural level within a First World nation was embarrassing to the elite, particularly after they began seeing themselves first and foremost as players on the imperial world stage.

    This game could have gone on for a long time but the powers that be decided to import a mass of third-worlders who, to a somewhat lesser degree than blacks, also have to be subsidized to bring them up to First World standards. As this mass grows there won't be enough money to continue the program. Too much tick and not enough dog. And as whites become a hated minority in their former homeland there's a chance that they will come to see the program as the hatred, robbery, and oppression that it always was and politically revolt against it. It's this sense of decline, of the system falling apart, of the cash cow starting to wobble, that is responsible for the shrieking hysteria among "Civil Rights" activists. They had the chance to prove themselves and they have failed. Now their political efforts are being exposed as nothing more than naked sponging that will have to be ramped up to (unsuccessfully in the long run) compete for a share of the declining pie.

    Absolutely correct. Third world folk cannot understand the concept of the golden goose. They think that their loots is forever. The eternal EBT card.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    Exactly.

    Almost all black people assume that if blacks take over something that is already successful, that they will keep it that way. They pay no attention to actual failures, to black failure after black failure. It is like a magic belief for them: if they take it over, nothing will be lost.

    And if something is lost, well, obviously white racism, not black failure, caused it.

    And here is the really funny part: white Liberals hold the same childish faith in magic that blacks do. High IQ white liberals, Jews and Gentiles, have the same faith in magic that low IQ blacks have.

    In the real world: whatever city, whatever school system, whatever country, blacks take over will begin to decay into Haiti or Zimbabwe or Detroit within a few months.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. Jake says:
    @Robert Weissberg
    Absolutely correct. Third world folk cannot understand the concept of the golden goose. They think that their loots is forever. The eternal EBT card.

    Exactly.

    Almost all black people assume that if blacks take over something that is already successful, that they will keep it that way. They pay no attention to actual failures, to black failure after black failure. It is like a magic belief for them: if they take it over, nothing will be lost.

    And if something is lost, well, obviously white racism, not black failure, caused it.

    And here is the really funny part: white Liberals hold the same childish faith in magic that blacks do. High IQ white liberals, Jews and Gentiles, have the same faith in magic that low IQ blacks have.

    In the real world: whatever city, whatever school system, whatever country, blacks take over will begin to decay into Haiti or Zimbabwe or Detroit within a few months.

    Read More
    • Agree: SMK
    • Replies: @SMK
    For nearly all black and left-liberals, Democrats and Republicans, and even mainstream, respectable conservatives, the transformation of Detroit from the "Paris of the West" to the worst large city in the U.S. had nothing to do with biology, with innate racial group differences, and everything to do with culture and politics and the magic and curse of "racism" and the "legacy of slavery and segregation." Magically, the further blacks and whites are removed from slavery and segregation, the less "racist" (whatever that now means exactly) whites and society becomes, the worse it gets in regard to charges of "racism" and "white supremacy," and now "white privilege, the more blacks hate whites for reasons that are trivial or purely imaginary, and the worse they behave, criminally and otherwise, in most respects.
    , @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    That's true of other third world groups that have their eyes on part or all of the USA, namely Mexicans and Moslems. They are both too arrogant and stupid to realize that wherever they takeover, it'll quickly turn into a replica of the homeland that they fled.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. Wally says: • Website
    @Anon
    There are countries in Sub-Saharan Africa with lower crime rates than some countries in Europe. How many of those would be required for you to admit that you're wrong?

    Really?

    Your proof is where?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Here you go:

    https://data.unodc.org

    Madagascar, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, the French territory of Réunion, Sierra Leone, Seychelles, Mauritius, Equatorial Guinea, Liberia, Mozambique, Sao Tome and Principe, Burundi, Rwanda (!), Somalia, Kenya, Zambia, the French territory of Mayotte, and Cameroon all have a lower murder rate than lily white Lithuania.

    Belgium has a higher murder rate than six of the above countries. Estonia, which is INCREDIBLY white, has a higher murder rate than eight of them. Latvia's murder rate is higher than a dozen.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That’s not allowing people to live freely. It’s the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn."

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the "good old days".

    "How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans?"

    **From the National Review, January 13, 2016….

    **Having previously accepted HUD funding through the Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) program, as well as HUD’s Community Development Block Grant program, Dubuque was formally obligated to “affirmatively further fair housing” in whatever way HUD defined that obligation.**

    Interesting. Dubuque willingly chose to take federal government funding for this particular program. Therefore, this city, fair or unfair, right or wrong, put itself in a position to abide by those rules.

    **Refusal to submit to HUD’s dictates would have led to the withdrawal of federal funding, a lawsuit for supposed discrimination, or both.**

    Lesson learned–do not accept federal funding lest one be subject to their regulations and "purposely" place blacks in white neighborhoods.

    **The cowed elected officials of Dubuque accordingly signed a “voluntary” (in truth, forced) consent agreement that effectively ceded control of the city’s housing policy to HUD for at least five years.**

    Again, the officials there completely understood that when they received federal money, they would be subject to stipulations. There was no “force” employed here. I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

    "Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There’s a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s."

    I am quite aware of northern de facto segregation. However, I am also old enough to remember when there were white families who sold their homes to non-white families, and while there were initial problems, those issues were addressed. And, of course, northern cities are "still livable for white families".

    "1) All groups are equally capable genetically".

    All people have the capability of being successful. Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.

    "2) every culture – which, of course, grows out of biology anyway – is equally good at producing achievement."

    Certainly, over the past two 200,000 years, people have developed new survival related cultural skills and technologies at a faster rate than natural selection could alter our bodies to adapt to those environmental challenges. So cultural evolution has shown to be faster than biological evolution, which has significantly modified the effect of natural selection on humans. However, there is a false perception that one culture is "better" than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

    "The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter."

    Of course the Civil Rights Movement was about equality of opportunity, considering Jim Crow laws denied opportunities for only a certain group of people. Is there an argument to be made that today's laws have leaned toward "equality of outcome"? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we "roll back" legislation to the "good old days" at the expense of liberty.

    "As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement."

    Refresh my memory as to exactly how I made this assertion and/or agree specifically with this assessment.

    "...curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one’s people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals."

    For SOME whites and non-whites, tribe and loyalty is important. You overstate the case.

    "But the Civil Rights movement doesn’t believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy."

    Assuming that there are these "genetic differences" in capability.

    OK, I’ll play:

    “However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.”

    Which groups? Exactly what legislation? And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Which groups?"

    The Alt Right.
    White nationalists.
    Neo-reactionaries.

    "Exactly what legislation?"

    Any laws deemed to be leftist or liberal in nature.

    "And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?"

    Refer to Vox Day's 14 points.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. Wally says:
    @Corvinus
    "The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding."

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.

    Is that why black dysfunction & ignorance is greater than ever …. in spite of billions & billions of white dollars, preferences, set-asides, ‘affirmative action’, being thrown at it?

    You must have voted for Hillary.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Is that why black dysfunction & ignorance is greater than ever..."

    It's actually human dysfunction and ignorance that is greater than ever. You are proof positive of that phenomenon.

    "You must have voted for Hillary."

    Didn't vote for her or Trump. Both were historically weak candidates.
    , @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    The majority of black babies are born to the dregs of black society. They set the tone of black society.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. @anonymous
    Well stated.

    But I'm afraid you'll never disturb the locked down thoughts of Corvinus, who may be an adroit troll keeping track of how many replies his/her clichéd comments attract. A much more skilled Tiny Duck.

    Yeah, I figure that’s exactly what he is. (I remember a few weeks back, he got surprisingly upset about an attack on Jewish influence. Interesting.) That’s why I usually like to call him “the actor that plays Corvinus.”

    Regardless, his comments while robotic and simple-minded need to be rebuffed occasionally for the uninformed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. MBlanc46 says:
    @vx37
    Black people are simply incapable of building or maintaining an advanced modern society. Doesn't necessarily make them bad people, but it is what it is. The real core of "Civil Rights" wasn't about voting rights or school desegregation, it was about taxing whites to lift blacks above their abilities into a semblance of First World lives. Blacks living at their natural level within a First World nation was embarrassing to the elite, particularly after they began seeing themselves first and foremost as players on the imperial world stage.

    This game could have gone on for a long time but the powers that be decided to import a mass of third-worlders who, to a somewhat lesser degree than blacks, also have to be subsidized to bring them up to First World standards. As this mass grows there won't be enough money to continue the program. Too much tick and not enough dog. And as whites become a hated minority in their former homeland there's a chance that they will come to see the program as the hatred, robbery, and oppression that it always was and politically revolt against it. It's this sense of decline, of the system falling apart, of the cash cow starting to wobble, that is responsible for the shrieking hysteria among "Civil Rights" activists. They had the chance to prove themselves and they have failed. Now their political efforts are being exposed as nothing more than naked sponging that will have to be ramped up to (unsuccessfully in the long run) compete for a share of the declining pie.

    That first paragraph is pure gold. Blacks used to be (mostly) productive citizens. Recognizing their cognitive limitations, we might have made a greater effort to raise their standard of living. Instead, we accepted the dogma of racial equality, automated many of the jobs that blacks used to do, and imported a mass of the Third Worlders to do even more of those jobs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    I seem to remember Thomas Sowell writing that the Federal Government has been tracking labor force participation since 1954 and that black men, women and teenagers were more likely to be in the workface than whites and that the rates have declined since then.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. MBlanc46 says:
    @Issac
    "Who would have predicted all the fuss about statues of Robert E. Lee or that professional football players could occupy center stage in a public discussion over racial inequality?"

    Anyone with more than trivial exposure to black communities. Civil rights would be rolled back tomorrow if the gilded liberals who defend them were made to live within walking distance.

    At least some of the gilded liberals do live within walking distance, in places such as Hyde Park, Chicago; Morningside Heights, NYC; and New Haven. They do see black behavior first hand, yet they still refuse to see it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. @Corvinus
    "So how do you explain government-sponsored affirmative action? That’s not allowing people to live freely. It’s the forced promotion of one group over another, much like you condemn."

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the "good old days".

    "How do explain government housing policy that purposely places blacks in white neighborhoods via Section 8 housing and other plans?"

    **From the National Review, January 13, 2016….

    **Having previously accepted HUD funding through the Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) program, as well as HUD’s Community Development Block Grant program, Dubuque was formally obligated to “affirmatively further fair housing” in whatever way HUD defined that obligation.**

    Interesting. Dubuque willingly chose to take federal government funding for this particular program. Therefore, this city, fair or unfair, right or wrong, put itself in a position to abide by those rules.

    **Refusal to submit to HUD’s dictates would have led to the withdrawal of federal funding, a lawsuit for supposed discrimination, or both.**

    Lesson learned–do not accept federal funding lest one be subject to their regulations and "purposely" place blacks in white neighborhoods.

    **The cowed elected officials of Dubuque accordingly signed a “voluntary” (in truth, forced) consent agreement that effectively ceded control of the city’s housing policy to HUD for at least five years.**

    Again, the officials there completely understood that when they received federal money, they would be subject to stipulations. There was no “force” employed here. I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

    "Also, you do realize that northern cities had their own unofficial version of Jim Crow going on, right? They just never codified it. There’s a reason northern cities were still livable for white families (not childless hipsters) until the 1960s."

    I am quite aware of northern de facto segregation. However, I am also old enough to remember when there were white families who sold their homes to non-white families, and while there were initial problems, those issues were addressed. And, of course, northern cities are "still livable for white families".

    "1) All groups are equally capable genetically".

    All people have the capability of being successful. Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.

    "2) every culture – which, of course, grows out of biology anyway – is equally good at producing achievement."

    Certainly, over the past two 200,000 years, people have developed new survival related cultural skills and technologies at a faster rate than natural selection could alter our bodies to adapt to those environmental challenges. So cultural evolution has shown to be faster than biological evolution, which has significantly modified the effect of natural selection on humans. However, there is a false perception that one culture is "better" than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

    "The Civil Rights movement is no longer about equality of opportunity (if it ever was), but equality of outcome. Those are very different. You are deceitful (or stupid) by claiming the movement is about the former when it is about the latter."

    Of course the Civil Rights Movement was about equality of opportunity, considering Jim Crow laws denied opportunities for only a certain group of people. Is there an argument to be made that today's laws have leaned toward "equality of outcome"? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we "roll back" legislation to the "good old days" at the expense of liberty.

    "As even you acknowledge, there are genetic and cultural differences among the various races in the United States which result in different levels of achievement."

    Refresh my memory as to exactly how I made this assertion and/or agree specifically with this assessment.

    "...curiously forgetting that for most non-whites (and even some whites like the Jews), tribe and loyalty to one’s people are just as important, if not more important, than your libertarian ideals."

    For SOME whites and non-whites, tribe and loyalty is important. You overstate the case.

    "But the Civil Rights movement doesn’t believe in genetic differences, so they will continue to push for government action to rectify group achievement differences, a far cry from your libertarian, Coke commercial fantasy."

    Assuming that there are these "genetic differences" in capability.

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the “good old days”.

    So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block “white racism.”

    A few “warts”, eh. You sound like Walter Durant defending Stalin. Gotta break a few eggs to stop those white racists.

    I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

    We’re learning. Wait until we figure out that violence works as well. Just kidding. ;)

    And, of course, northern cities are “still livable for white families”.

    Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to “northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school.

    You sure are a useful tool for the rich. Curious.

    All people have the capability of being successful.

    First, I was talking average differences among groups. You deceitfully try to make it a question about individuals. You are a very disingenuous person and debater. It’s unfortunate – and utterly predictable.

    Regardless, you are simply wrong. Blacks as a group cannot be as successful at creating and maintaining a modern civilization as whites and Asians. They simply don’t have enough of a smart fraction. It’s unfortunate and not their fault. But it is reality.

    Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground.

    So, no not all people – as in a race – are equally capable. If they were, we’d have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don’t.

    Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.

    When did I ever say that group differences were 100% genetic. Indeed, I mentioned several times that culture/environment is important. Probably a 50-50 split.

    Why do you lie about what I said.

    The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren’t that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics.

    Why can’t you acknowledge that genetics matter with average group differences and that those difference matter in outcomes? To continually deny this is embarrassing for you.

    However, there is a false perception that one culture is “better” than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

    Some culture are “better” at achieving certain outcomes. Doesn’t make them better in a general sense but it does make them better at some things, and if those things make for a wealthier or safer society on average, than you have to accept that.

    And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work. Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology. They act on each other but changing the biology via cultural pressure takes a very, very long time.

    Is there an argument to be made that today’s laws have leaned toward “equality of outcome”? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.

    So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism. And the proof of that racism is the underachievement of NAMs. And since you refuse to acknowledge that the NAM underachievement is caused – at least in part – by genetic differences, you will continue to use that NAM underachievement as proof of white racism. (See Tautology.)

    This proof will allow you to enforce ever more draconian policies against whites.

    Thank you Corvinus for finally showing your true colors.

    You are anti-science and will stand behind those who unfairly punish innocent whites – and Asians.

    You are a liar who twists words to achieve a simple goal.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block “white racism.”

    There is no "white racism", just racism. And it's not "forced". Companies have the liberty to hire whom they want.

    "Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to “northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school."

    Chicago. New York. Boston. Wealthy whites live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school. You are not THAT dense, are you?

    "First, I was talking average differences among groups."

    Which you squarely focus on how biological differences among groups is THE factor why individuals in those groups are generally inferior.

    "Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground."

    Blacks create and maintain modern civilizations. They certainly have recently struggled in large part because of the longstanding effects of the "invade the world, invite the world" white mentality. Remember, a number of African nations only received their independence 60 years ago. They were wrecked by imperialism. Sure, Europeans built infrastructure and created schools, but their intervention created inevitable power vacuums. African nations were doing just fine building their own civilizations.

    "So, no not all people – as in a race – are equally capable. If they were, we’d have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don’t."

    Of course they are capable. They were simply bulldozed for 500 years.

    "The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren’t that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics."

    A combination of factors. Not just culture and not just genetics.

    "And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work."

    Assuming that this "Asian grind mentality" is actually a thing and assuming that blacks lack the capability to demonstrate a work ethic.

    "Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology."

    Possibly. But then again, maybe not.

    "So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism."

    It's not a "bogey man", as you clearly have demonstrated.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    Really?

    Your proof is where?

    Here you go:

    https://data.unodc.org

    Madagascar, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, the French territory of Réunion, Sierra Leone, Seychelles, Mauritius, Equatorial Guinea, Liberia, Mozambique, Sao Tome and Principe, Burundi, Rwanda (!), Somalia, Kenya, Zambia, the French territory of Mayotte, and Cameroon all have a lower murder rate than lily white Lithuania.

    Belgium has a higher murder rate than six of the above countries. Estonia, which is INCREDIBLY white, has a higher murder rate than eight of them. Latvia’s murder rate is higher than a dozen.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Pure bluff.

    Where? I see nothing of the kind.
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Hey, Anon is somewhat right. Supposedly, Central and South America (16.3 per 100,000) have a higher murder rate than Africa (12.5). (Of course, one might question the record-keeping abilities of African countries.)

    Europe comes in at 3.0, with Asia at 2.9.

    There are even a few African countries that slide in under Russia - the bad ass of the West. But I can't imagine that anyone wanting to dissuade whites and Asians that blacks are just a great bunch of guys would want people looking at these numbers - which I highly suspect undercount blacks/African crime. (Africa is notorious for bad record-keeping as anyone who has worked there knows.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. America is having a love affair with stupidity. The only question is are they going to go all the way.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  40. @Corvinus
    "The so-called civil rights movement was invented to promote unconstitutional federal group rights for delusional victim culture people."

    Corrected for accuracy --> The civil rights movement bore witness to several groups of people who fought for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness because several rights found in the Constitution were perpetually violated by federal, state, and local officials.

    "Democrats and neocons love this scheme because it enables them to reliably buy the votes of the ignorant American majority."

    This "ignorant American majority" is white. Why are you denigrating your own kind? What makes YOU other than ignorant compared to your brethren?

    "Democrats and neocons are fond of this scheme so much that they’ve invented a euphemism to sell it to the ignorant public: diversity and inclusion."

    Diversity and inclusion is a feature, not a bug, of the United States since its inception.

    The diversity scheme has always been dominated by white people, especially white queers, Jews, Zionist, and Feminist.

    Unconstitutional features are still unconstitutional.

    Your kind, the BLM and Antifa and Neocon style thugs, are violent hypocrites that endlessly demand more federal entitlements because you are smarmy, shameless criminals.

    The world is a big place, and your kind is free to leave and establish a totalitarian victim cult entitlement utopia elsewhere.

    US is not a democracy, it’s a constitutional republic.

    Understand it as a fact, live by it, or be gone.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "The diversity scheme has always been dominated by white people, especially white queers, Jews, Zionist, and Feminist."

    Diversity is other than a scheme. It is a component of our human nature. Unless you mean how the Britons, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Frisians, Romans, Danes, and Normas were deracinated in similar fashion as they got all tangled and twisted to create the English people, that bastion of Western Civilization?

    "Your kind, the BLM and Antifa and Neocon style thugs, are violent hypocrites that endlessly demand more federal entitlements because you are smarmy, shameless criminals."

    My kind is human. BLM, Antifa, Neocon...that's not my in-group.

    "The world is a big place, and your kind is free to leave and establish a totalitarian victim cult entitlement utopia elsewhere."

    Like the Alt Right?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. Jim says:
    @Anon
    There are countries in Sub-Saharan Africa with lower crime rates than some countries in Europe. How many of those would be required for you to admit that you're wrong?

    Official statistics from Sub-Saharan countries are unreliable.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    These are U.N. figures.
    , @gwynedd1
    A fine example of a well ordered society.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Michelle says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Let me make a provocative argument:

    The young generation of NAMs and white/Asian SJWs given what they've been taught and what every elite institution repeatedly tells them are perfectly correct in being angry at the current situation and demanding much more aggressive policies to bring NAM achievement and living standards up to those of whites.

    Let's consider what this society preaches as gospel.

    1. Blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, gays, etc., and, to a degree, white women are being held back in a variety of ways by white (mostly male) racism - both current and historic and both conscious and unconscious.

    2. This racism not only leads to lower living standards, it leads to NAM deaths in the form of increased crime levels (which are ultimately the long-term result of white racism though the actual killing is done by NAMs because of the difficult condition in which they are raised - conditions caused by white racism) and (white) police brutality. People of color are literally dying because of white racism!

    3. Despite 50+ years of government policies, affirmative action and diversity training in schools and corporations, whites (again, usually men) simply refuse to give up their racism. The proof can be seen in the continued underperformance and high crime rates of NAMs, particularly blacks. Since we know that race is a social construct and all peoples are identically capable and no more or less violent than one another, the only cause can white racism.

    4. Despite the failure of these policies, the leading politicians from both parties (usually white) and other leaders of society (academia, business, media, etc.) refuse to consider more aggressive tactics to get whites to give up their racism. The old guard is sitting on its hands while PoC die!

    5. Policies to solve white racism must become as aggressive as needed to end white racism, which is holding down millions of people of color and causing the deaths of thousands every year. Does destroying statutes compare to thousands of black deaths every year? No. Does beating a few white racists compare to thousands of black deaths every year? No. Does silencing the allies of white racists compare to thousands of black deaths every year? No.

    As you can see, once you assume that millions of NAMs are being forced to live in poverty or near poverty and thousands of blacks and Hispanics are being killed every year due to white racism, there are almost no limits on your policies to stop white racism. Confiscation of property. No problem. Beatings of whites. No problem. Killing a few whites. Regrettable, but so long as the numbers are lower than the number of blacks being killed each year, acceptable.

    If you believe what literally everyone in society has told you since birth - that white racism is causing untold pain in society - you would be justified in some pretty damn aggressive tactics to end it.

    This will not end well because no one is going to tell the truth.

    Beautifully stated, Sir.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Jim
    Official statistics from Sub-Saharan countries are unreliable.

    These are U.N. figures.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. Wally says:
    @Anon
    Here you go:

    https://data.unodc.org

    Madagascar, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, the French territory of Réunion, Sierra Leone, Seychelles, Mauritius, Equatorial Guinea, Liberia, Mozambique, Sao Tome and Principe, Burundi, Rwanda (!), Somalia, Kenya, Zambia, the French territory of Mayotte, and Cameroon all have a lower murder rate than lily white Lithuania.

    Belgium has a higher murder rate than six of the above countries. Estonia, which is INCREDIBLY white, has a higher murder rate than eight of them. Latvia's murder rate is higher than a dozen.

    Pure bluff.

    Where? I see nothing of the kind.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    It's all there. You seem like a smart lad. Find it yourself. I gave you everything you need to look for.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. gwynedd1 says:
    @Jim
    Official statistics from Sub-Saharan countries are unreliable.

    A fine example of a well ordered society.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. Truth says:
    @Jake
    The Civil Rights movement always featured a strong dose of shake down con artistry. More troubling, back to at least the 'Gay 90s' (1890s), white sexual adventurists with money used blacks as their excuse to advocate for sexual revolution.

    You cannot separate black civil rights from sexual revolution.

    …Muh Dyk.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    Pure bluff.

    Where? I see nothing of the kind.

    It’s all there. You seem like a smart lad. Find it yourself. I gave you everything you need to look for.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    IOW, you're bluffing. There's nothing there.

    Your BS was called.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. Wally says:
    @Anon
    It's all there. You seem like a smart lad. Find it yourself. I gave you everything you need to look for.

    IOW, you’re bluffing. There’s nothing there.

    Your BS was called.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    I'm not going to do your work for you. I gave you a place where you can find all the information. If you're too God-damned stupid to find it yourself, then that's your problem.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. @Anon
    Here you go:

    https://data.unodc.org

    Madagascar, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, the French territory of Réunion, Sierra Leone, Seychelles, Mauritius, Equatorial Guinea, Liberia, Mozambique, Sao Tome and Principe, Burundi, Rwanda (!), Somalia, Kenya, Zambia, the French territory of Mayotte, and Cameroon all have a lower murder rate than lily white Lithuania.

    Belgium has a higher murder rate than six of the above countries. Estonia, which is INCREDIBLY white, has a higher murder rate than eight of them. Latvia's murder rate is higher than a dozen.

    Hey, Anon is somewhat right. Supposedly, Central and South America (16.3 per 100,000) have a higher murder rate than Africa (12.5). (Of course, one might question the record-keeping abilities of African countries.)

    Europe comes in at 3.0, with Asia at 2.9.

    There are even a few African countries that slide in under Russia – the bad ass of the West. But I can’t imagine that anyone wanting to dissuade whites and Asians that blacks are just a great bunch of guys would want people looking at these numbers – which I highly suspect undercount blacks/African crime. (Africa is notorious for bad record-keeping as anyone who has worked there knows.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. Corvinus says:
    @anonymous
    OK, I’ll play:

    “However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.”

    Which groups? Exactly what legislation? And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?

    “Which groups?”

    The Alt Right.
    White nationalists.
    Neo-reactionaries.

    “Exactly what legislation?”

    Any laws deemed to be leftist or liberal in nature.

    “And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?”

    Refer to Vox Day’s 14 points.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Don't forget the Cossacks! They're always just over the mountain ready to strike. ;)
    , @Issac
    I'm not aware of any definition of "Liberty," that makes allowance for wealth redistribution, affirmative action, legal supremacy, and obligatory proximity. Indeed, you are defending anti-liberty as substitute for liberty that might harm your present material situation.
    , @anonymous
    Yep, you’re a B+ troll.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    IOW, you're bluffing. There's nothing there.

    Your BS was called.

    I’m not going to do your work for you. I gave you a place where you can find all the information. If you’re too God-damned stupid to find it yourself, then that’s your problem.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. @Corvinus
    "Which groups?"

    The Alt Right.
    White nationalists.
    Neo-reactionaries.

    "Exactly what legislation?"

    Any laws deemed to be leftist or liberal in nature.

    "And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?"

    Refer to Vox Day's 14 points.

    Don’t forget the Cossacks! They’re always just over the mountain ready to strike. ;)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Corvinus says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    Undoubtedly, affirmative action has its warts. But despite the progress made in our nation in the area of race relations, there are several groups of people who would at a drop of a hat work to change the system to the “good old days”.
     
    So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block "white racism."

    A few "warts", eh. You sound like Walter Durant defending Stalin. Gotta break a few eggs to stop those white racists.

    I thought whites are high in time preference and refrain from playing the victim card. Oops.

     

    We're learning. Wait until we figure out that violence works as well. Just kidding. ;)

    And, of course, northern cities are “still livable for white families”.
     
    Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to "northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school.

    You sure are a useful tool for the rich. Curious.

    All people have the capability of being successful.
     
    First, I was talking average differences among groups. You deceitfully try to make it a question about individuals. You are a very disingenuous person and debater. It's unfortunate - and utterly predictable.

    Regardless, you are simply wrong. Blacks as a group cannot be as successful at creating and maintaining a modern civilization as whites and Asians. They simply don't have enough of a smart fraction. It's unfortunate and not their fault. But it is reality.

    Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground.

    So, no not all people - as in a race - are equally capable. If they were, we'd have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don't.

    Genetics and environment each play a critical role. No one factor unequivocally tips the scales.
     
    When did I ever say that group differences were 100% genetic. Indeed, I mentioned several times that culture/environment is important. Probably a 50-50 split.

    Why do you lie about what I said.

    The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren't that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics.

    Why can't you acknowledge that genetics matter with average group differences and that those difference matter in outcomes? To continually deny this is embarrassing for you.

    However, there is a false perception that one culture is “better” than another culture, that cultural traits inherent in one culture are not found in other cultures, that other cultures lack any capability to adapt or adopt or assimilate into other cultures.

     

    Some culture are "better" at achieving certain outcomes. Doesn't make them better in a general sense but it does make them better at some things, and if those things make for a wealthier or safer society on average, than you have to accept that.

    And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work. Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology. They act on each other but changing the biology via cultural pressure takes a very, very long time.

    Is there an argument to be made that today’s laws have leaned toward “equality of outcome”? Absolutely. However, as I clearly stated before, there are several groups of people dedicated to ensuring that we “roll back” legislation to the “good old days” at the expense of liberty.

     

    So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism. And the proof of that racism is the underachievement of NAMs. And since you refuse to acknowledge that the NAM underachievement is caused - at least in part - by genetic differences, you will continue to use that NAM underachievement as proof of white racism. (See Tautology.)

    This proof will allow you to enforce ever more draconian policies against whites.

    Thank you Corvinus for finally showing your true colors.

    You are anti-science and will stand behind those who unfairly punish innocent whites - and Asians.

    You are a liar who twists words to achieve a simple goal.

    “So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block “white racism.”

    There is no “white racism”, just racism. And it’s not “forced”. Companies have the liberty to hire whom they want.

    “Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to “northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school.”

    Chicago. New York. Boston. Wealthy whites live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school. You are not THAT dense, are you?

    “First, I was talking average differences among groups.”

    Which you squarely focus on how biological differences among groups is THE factor why individuals in those groups are generally inferior.

    “Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground.”

    Blacks create and maintain modern civilizations. They certainly have recently struggled in large part because of the longstanding effects of the “invade the world, invite the world” white mentality. Remember, a number of African nations only received their independence 60 years ago. They were wrecked by imperialism. Sure, Europeans built infrastructure and created schools, but their intervention created inevitable power vacuums. African nations were doing just fine building their own civilizations.

    “So, no not all people – as in a race – are equally capable. If they were, we’d have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don’t.”

    Of course they are capable. They were simply bulldozed for 500 years.

    “The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren’t that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics.”

    A combination of factors. Not just culture and not just genetics.

    “And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work.”

    Assuming that this “Asian grind mentality” is actually a thing and assuming that blacks lack the capability to demonstrate a work ethic.

    “Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology.”

    Possibly. But then again, maybe not.

    “So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism.”

    It’s not a “bogey man”, as you clearly have demonstrated.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Corvinus,

    As your acting coach, I have to say that you'll letting your mask slip down. Stop admitting to being a classic hate whitey SJW and get back to your pseudo libertarian, we-are-the-world Coke commercial schtick.

    It's the better play.

    You can't tell the rubes the truth until we're 100% sure that they're defeated. Slow down. We need another generation or so.
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    The Actor Who Plays Corvinus,

    Prove white racism.

    You're only proof is black and Hispanic underachievement. But that very likely is caused by genetic differences, just as white underperformance compared to NE Asians is partially genetic.

    I have a lots of evidence on my side that this underperformance is at least partially genetic.

    The unraveling of our DNA shows that genes impact our intelligence and that genes are highly heretible. Twin studies show the same thing.

    Genetics count and our genes are not evenly distributed, not among individuals and not among population groups, i.e. races. Kind of fits the Theory of Evolution, doesn't it.

    Every test related to IQ shows NE Asians with a higher IQ than whites. Poor Asians outscore poor whites, middle class NE Asians outscore middle class whites, etc. This nice linear performance is important. Same goes for whites and blacks.

    What proof do you have that black underachievement to whites (and whites to NE Asians) is not heavily genetic?

    Where's your counter-argument?

    You don't have one. You have semantics. You have, "Legacy of racism!" But you have no proof.

    You're the modern equivalent of a medieval monk or a Soviet apparatchik. You're "arguments" only work with the converted or the cowed. Once a Galileo speaks up, you have nothing but threats and empty rhetoric.

    I can only hope that you're a troll, an actor, because at least you wouldn't be a fool.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. Corvinus says:
    @Wally
    Is that why black dysfunction & ignorance is greater than ever .... in spite of billions & billions of white dollars, preferences, set-asides, 'affirmative action', being thrown at it?

    You must have voted for Hillary.

    “Is that why black dysfunction & ignorance is greater than ever…”

    It’s actually human dysfunction and ignorance that is greater than ever. You are proof positive of that phenomenon.

    “You must have voted for Hillary.”

    Didn’t vote for her or Trump. Both were historically weak candidates.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. Issac says:
    @Corvinus
    "Which groups?"

    The Alt Right.
    White nationalists.
    Neo-reactionaries.

    "Exactly what legislation?"

    Any laws deemed to be leftist or liberal in nature.

    "And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?"

    Refer to Vox Day's 14 points.

    I’m not aware of any definition of “Liberty,” that makes allowance for wealth redistribution, affirmative action, legal supremacy, and obligatory proximity. Indeed, you are defending anti-liberty as substitute for liberty that might harm your present material situation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "I’m not aware of any definition of “Liberty,” that makes allowance for wealth redistribution, affirmative action, legal supremacy, and obligatory proximity."

    Of course liberty makes allowance for such things, especially when terms are made up like "obligatory proximity" without context or background. The citizens of our nation have the freedom to create or oppose policies such as wealth redistribution and affirmative action. As far as "legal supremacy", the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.

    "Indeed, you are defending anti-liberty as substitute for liberty that might harm your present material situation."

    You would be entirely misrepresenting the situation here.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "Which groups?"

    The Alt Right.
    White nationalists.
    Neo-reactionaries.

    "Exactly what legislation?"

    Any laws deemed to be leftist or liberal in nature.

    "And to what effect “at the expense of liberty”?"

    Refer to Vox Day's 14 points.

    Yep, you’re a B+ troll.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Yep, you’re a B+ troll."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqasAIyGeBU
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. Corvinus says:
    @Issac
    I'm not aware of any definition of "Liberty," that makes allowance for wealth redistribution, affirmative action, legal supremacy, and obligatory proximity. Indeed, you are defending anti-liberty as substitute for liberty that might harm your present material situation.

    “I’m not aware of any definition of “Liberty,” that makes allowance for wealth redistribution, affirmative action, legal supremacy, and obligatory proximity.”

    Of course liberty makes allowance for such things, especially when terms are made up like “obligatory proximity” without context or background. The citizens of our nation have the freedom to create or oppose policies such as wealth redistribution and affirmative action. As far as “legal supremacy”, the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.

    “Indeed, you are defending anti-liberty as substitute for liberty that might harm your present material situation.”

    You would be entirely misrepresenting the situation here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. Corvinus says:
    @Joe Franklin
    The diversity scheme has always been dominated by white people, especially white queers, Jews, Zionist, and Feminist.

    Unconstitutional features are still unconstitutional.

    Your kind, the BLM and Antifa and Neocon style thugs, are violent hypocrites that endlessly demand more federal entitlements because you are smarmy, shameless criminals.

    The world is a big place, and your kind is free to leave and establish a totalitarian victim cult entitlement utopia elsewhere.

    US is not a democracy, it's a constitutional republic.

    Understand it as a fact, live by it, or be gone.

    “The diversity scheme has always been dominated by white people, especially white queers, Jews, Zionist, and Feminist.”

    Diversity is other than a scheme. It is a component of our human nature. Unless you mean how the Britons, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Frisians, Romans, Danes, and Normas were deracinated in similar fashion as they got all tangled and twisted to create the English people, that bastion of Western Civilization?

    “Your kind, the BLM and Antifa and Neocon style thugs, are violent hypocrites that endlessly demand more federal entitlements because you are smarmy, shameless criminals.”

    My kind is human. BLM, Antifa, Neocon…that’s not my in-group.

    “The world is a big place, and your kind is free to leave and establish a totalitarian victim cult entitlement utopia elsewhere.”

    Like the Alt Right?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Franklin
    Diversity in accordance with the US constitution is 50 different state political solutions that are customized by and peculiar to the people of each state.

    In contrast, the leftist version of diversity is illicit totalitarian federal nonsense.

    Leftist have stolen state-people powers that are recognized in the US constitution 9th and 10th amendments.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. @Corvinus
    "So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block “white racism.”

    There is no "white racism", just racism. And it's not "forced". Companies have the liberty to hire whom they want.

    "Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to “northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school."

    Chicago. New York. Boston. Wealthy whites live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school. You are not THAT dense, are you?

    "First, I was talking average differences among groups."

    Which you squarely focus on how biological differences among groups is THE factor why individuals in those groups are generally inferior.

    "Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground."

    Blacks create and maintain modern civilizations. They certainly have recently struggled in large part because of the longstanding effects of the "invade the world, invite the world" white mentality. Remember, a number of African nations only received their independence 60 years ago. They were wrecked by imperialism. Sure, Europeans built infrastructure and created schools, but their intervention created inevitable power vacuums. African nations were doing just fine building their own civilizations.

    "So, no not all people – as in a race – are equally capable. If they were, we’d have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don’t."

    Of course they are capable. They were simply bulldozed for 500 years.

    "The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren’t that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics."

    A combination of factors. Not just culture and not just genetics.

    "And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work."

    Assuming that this "Asian grind mentality" is actually a thing and assuming that blacks lack the capability to demonstrate a work ethic.

    "Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology."

    Possibly. But then again, maybe not.

    "So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism."

    It's not a "bogey man", as you clearly have demonstrated.

    Corvinus,

    As your acting coach, I have to say that you’ll letting your mask slip down. Stop admitting to being a classic hate whitey SJW and get back to your pseudo libertarian, we-are-the-world Coke commercial schtick.

    It’s the better play.

    You can’t tell the rubes the truth until we’re 100% sure that they’re defeated. Slow down. We need another generation or so.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    All I am doing is running you in circles with rhetoric. You don't know whether you are coming or going.

    Tens of millions of Americans, upper class and lower class, from black to Hispanic to white to Asian, live their lives separately. They generally interact with one another in a kind, considerate manner.
    While there is a host of political, economic, and social problems, there still remains a core sense of loyalty to our nation. The young, especially the Millennials and Generation Y, will lead the way with their moderate economic views and liberal social views. Our nation is changing, no different than in past eras. There is no stopping it :)

    "You can’t tell the rubes the truth until we’re 100% sure that they’re defeated. Slow down. We need another generation or so."

    Exactly. You want to "force feed", at best, or "jackboot", at worst, a particular ideology regardless of the consequences. You are no different than the Jews, or the elites, or the globalists.

    Again, what makes you know better than the "ignorant" masses? Is it not possible that YOU have been hoodwinked and bamboozled?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. @Corvinus
    "So you do believe in forced promotion of NAMs to block “white racism.”

    There is no "white racism", just racism. And it's not "forced". Companies have the liberty to hire whom they want.

    "Check out the number of whites in DC. Then check out the number of white students in DC public high schools. You need to fix your statement to “northern cities are still livable for rich white families who can afford to live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school."

    Chicago. New York. Boston. Wealthy whites live in white neighborhoods and send their kids to private school. You are not THAT dense, are you?

    "First, I was talking average differences among groups."

    Which you squarely focus on how biological differences among groups is THE factor why individuals in those groups are generally inferior.

    "Please show me these wildly successful black populated and black run cities and countries. Maybe Barbados and Trinidad and Tabago. But those are tourist driven and have a long of white admixture. South Africa functions because of the whites and Indians. Outside of that, you get the depressingly long list of abject failure from Detroit to Zimbabwe where blacks took a well-functioning society/economy and ran it into the ground."

    Blacks create and maintain modern civilizations. They certainly have recently struggled in large part because of the longstanding effects of the "invade the world, invite the world" white mentality. Remember, a number of African nations only received their independence 60 years ago. They were wrecked by imperialism. Sure, Europeans built infrastructure and created schools, but their intervention created inevitable power vacuums. African nations were doing just fine building their own civilizations.

    "So, no not all people – as in a race – are equally capable. If they were, we’d have wealthy, functioning societies in sub-Saharan Africa, and we don’t."

    Of course they are capable. They were simply bulldozed for 500 years.

    "The point is that genetics are still 50% of the games, more in developed countries because environmental differences aren’t that great. Wealthy black continue to score below poor whites. Why? Culture. Of course not. Genetics."

    A combination of factors. Not just culture and not just genetics.

    "And, yes, so far, there is zero evidence that blacks AS A GROUP will adopt the Asian grind mentality when it comes to studying or work."

    Assuming that this "Asian grind mentality" is actually a thing and assuming that blacks lack the capability to demonstrate a work ethic.

    "Possibly because culture is an outgrowth of biology."

    Possibly. But then again, maybe not.

    "So I was right. The Civil Rights movement of today is all about defeating the bogey man of white racism."

    It's not a "bogey man", as you clearly have demonstrated.

    The Actor Who Plays Corvinus,

    Prove white racism.

    You’re only proof is black and Hispanic underachievement. But that very likely is caused by genetic differences, just as white underperformance compared to NE Asians is partially genetic.

    I have a lots of evidence on my side that this underperformance is at least partially genetic.

    The unraveling of our DNA shows that genes impact our intelligence and that genes are highly heretible. Twin studies show the same thing.

    Genetics count and our genes are not evenly distributed, not among individuals and not among population groups, i.e. races. Kind of fits the Theory of Evolution, doesn’t it.

    Every test related to IQ shows NE Asians with a higher IQ than whites. Poor Asians outscore poor whites, middle class NE Asians outscore middle class whites, etc. This nice linear performance is important. Same goes for whites and blacks.

    What proof do you have that black underachievement to whites (and whites to NE Asians) is not heavily genetic?

    Where’s your counter-argument?

    You don’t have one. You have semantics. You have, “Legacy of racism!” But you have no proof.

    You’re the modern equivalent of a medieval monk or a Soviet apparatchik. You’re “arguments” only work with the converted or the cowed. Once a Galileo speaks up, you have nothing but threats and empty rhetoric.

    I can only hope that you’re a troll, an actor, because at least you wouldn’t be a fool.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Prove white racism."

    Actually, it's prove racism. All groups of people have individuals who are racist. Unfortunately, the Coalition of the Right Fringe and the Coalition of the Left Fringe co-opt this term for their own designs. The normies, however, clearly understand racism exists even today despite your head in the sand approach.

    "I have a lots of evidence on my side that this underperformance is at least partially genetic."

    How one interprets that evidence is the source of that controversy.

    "The unraveling of our DNA shows that genes impact our intelligence and that genes are highly heretible. Twin studies show the same thing."

    With environment apparently playing a decided role. Chicken or egg?

    http://people.virginia.edu/~ent3c/papers2/Turkheimer%20psychological%20science.pdf

    "What proof do you have that black underachievement to whites (and whites to NE Asians) is not heavily genetic?"

    https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/the-heritability-of-intelligence-not-what-you-think

    https://medium.com/neodotlife/intelligence-genes-eb18c5ef759c

    http://bostonreview.net/science-nature-race/ned-block-race-genes-and-iq
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. Corvinus says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Corvinus,

    As your acting coach, I have to say that you'll letting your mask slip down. Stop admitting to being a classic hate whitey SJW and get back to your pseudo libertarian, we-are-the-world Coke commercial schtick.

    It's the better play.

    You can't tell the rubes the truth until we're 100% sure that they're defeated. Slow down. We need another generation or so.

    All I am doing is running you in circles with rhetoric. You don’t know whether you are coming or going.

    Tens of millions of Americans, upper class and lower class, from black to Hispanic to white to Asian, live their lives separately. They generally interact with one another in a kind, considerate manner.
    While there is a host of political, economic, and social problems, there still remains a core sense of loyalty to our nation. The young, especially the Millennials and Generation Y, will lead the way with their moderate economic views and liberal social views. Our nation is changing, no different than in past eras. There is no stopping it :)

    “You can’t tell the rubes the truth until we’re 100% sure that they’re defeated. Slow down. We need another generation or so.”

    Exactly. You want to “force feed”, at best, or “jackboot”, at worst, a particular ideology regardless of the consequences. You are no different than the Jews, or the elites, or the globalists.

    Again, what makes you know better than the “ignorant” masses? Is it not possible that YOU have been hoodwinked and bamboozled?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You're not a big one on facts, are you.

    Our nation is changing, no different than in past eras. There is no stopping it

     

    We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You're a dying breed. I'm the future - for all races in the U.S. It's inevitable. It's the nature curve of history.

    You are no different than the Jews
     
    You got that right.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. @Corvinus
    All I am doing is running you in circles with rhetoric. You don't know whether you are coming or going.

    Tens of millions of Americans, upper class and lower class, from black to Hispanic to white to Asian, live their lives separately. They generally interact with one another in a kind, considerate manner.
    While there is a host of political, economic, and social problems, there still remains a core sense of loyalty to our nation. The young, especially the Millennials and Generation Y, will lead the way with their moderate economic views and liberal social views. Our nation is changing, no different than in past eras. There is no stopping it :)

    "You can’t tell the rubes the truth until we’re 100% sure that they’re defeated. Slow down. We need another generation or so."

    Exactly. You want to "force feed", at best, or "jackboot", at worst, a particular ideology regardless of the consequences. You are no different than the Jews, or the elites, or the globalists.

    Again, what makes you know better than the "ignorant" masses? Is it not possible that YOU have been hoodwinked and bamboozled?

    You’re not a big one on facts, are you.

    Our nation is changing, no different than in past eras. There is no stopping it

    We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You’re a dying breed. I’m the future – for all races in the U.S. It’s inevitable. It’s the nature curve of history.

    You are no different than the Jews

    You got that right.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You’re a dying breed. I’m the future – for all races in the U.S. It’s inevitable. It’s the nature curve of history."

    No, it's the other way around. You really wish upon a star...

    https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/06/28/diversity-defines-the-millennial-generation
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. Corvinus says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You're not a big one on facts, are you.

    Our nation is changing, no different than in past eras. There is no stopping it

     

    We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You're a dying breed. I'm the future - for all races in the U.S. It's inevitable. It's the nature curve of history.

    You are no different than the Jews
     
    You got that right.

    “We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You’re a dying breed. I’m the future – for all races in the U.S. It’s inevitable. It’s the nature curve of history.”

    No, it’s the other way around. You really wish upon a star…

    https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/06/28/diversity-defines-the-millennial-generation

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Read history, my friend.

    People like you have existed forever. They always do well in the hothouse until . . .
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Btw, since you brought up the Jews, what's your feeling toward American Jews. I would think that you'd be hanging out on the comments section of Jewish publications since we sad racist whites could only dream of their level of ethnic cohesion and organization.

    So, Actor Who Plays Corvinus, what are your thoughts on American Jews and why are wasting your time here instead of berating American Jews on their lack of we-are-the-world philosophy?

    Personally, I love them and want to emulate them. So why are you here? You should be far too busy writing your boilerplate pseudo libertarian rantings against them.

    Hmm. Seems odd. Please give me a long diatribe against the tribe since they're exactly how we'd like to be except they're already there.

    Please, feel free to write all that you want. Or is that you don't want to bite the hand that feeds you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. @Corvinus
    "We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You’re a dying breed. I’m the future – for all races in the U.S. It’s inevitable. It’s the nature curve of history."

    No, it's the other way around. You really wish upon a star...

    https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/06/28/diversity-defines-the-millennial-generation

    Read history, my friend.

    People like you have existed forever. They always do well in the hothouse until . . .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Read history, my friend."

    More than you can even comprehend.

    "People like you have existed forever. They always do well in the hothouse until . . ."

    Until what? You and your homies with torches and pitchforks just itching for a race war? N-----, please.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. Corvinus says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    The Actor Who Plays Corvinus,

    Prove white racism.

    You're only proof is black and Hispanic underachievement. But that very likely is caused by genetic differences, just as white underperformance compared to NE Asians is partially genetic.

    I have a lots of evidence on my side that this underperformance is at least partially genetic.

    The unraveling of our DNA shows that genes impact our intelligence and that genes are highly heretible. Twin studies show the same thing.

    Genetics count and our genes are not evenly distributed, not among individuals and not among population groups, i.e. races. Kind of fits the Theory of Evolution, doesn't it.

    Every test related to IQ shows NE Asians with a higher IQ than whites. Poor Asians outscore poor whites, middle class NE Asians outscore middle class whites, etc. This nice linear performance is important. Same goes for whites and blacks.

    What proof do you have that black underachievement to whites (and whites to NE Asians) is not heavily genetic?

    Where's your counter-argument?

    You don't have one. You have semantics. You have, "Legacy of racism!" But you have no proof.

    You're the modern equivalent of a medieval monk or a Soviet apparatchik. You're "arguments" only work with the converted or the cowed. Once a Galileo speaks up, you have nothing but threats and empty rhetoric.

    I can only hope that you're a troll, an actor, because at least you wouldn't be a fool.

    “Prove white racism.”

    Actually, it’s prove racism. All groups of people have individuals who are racist. Unfortunately, the Coalition of the Right Fringe and the Coalition of the Left Fringe co-opt this term for their own designs. The normies, however, clearly understand racism exists even today despite your head in the sand approach.

    “I have a lots of evidence on my side that this underperformance is at least partially genetic.”

    How one interprets that evidence is the source of that controversy.

    “The unraveling of our DNA shows that genes impact our intelligence and that genes are highly heretible. Twin studies show the same thing.”

    With environment apparently playing a decided role. Chicken or egg?

    http://people.virginia.edu/~ent3c/papers2/Turkheimer%20psychological%20science.pdf

    “What proof do you have that black underachievement to whites (and whites to NE Asians) is not heavily genetic?”

    https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/the-heritability-of-intelligence-not-what-you-think

    https://medium.com/neodotlife/intelligence-genes-eb18c5ef759c

    http://bostonreview.net/science-nature-race/ned-block-race-genes-and-iq

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You are hilarious. You're linking to papers that agree with me, except the one written in 1995, and his arguments about indirect heritability are laughable and are never seen anymore, i.e you really had to work to dig up this garbage. C'mon Corny, you can do better.

    To be clear: these findings do not mean that differences in intelligence are entirely determined by culture. Numerous researchers have found that the structure of cognitive abilities is strongly influenced by genes (although we haven't the foggiest idea which genes are reliably important).
     
    Actually, we are beginning to discover those genes.

    Researchers have long known that intelligence is highly heritable, meaning much of the difference between your IQ and someone else’s — about 40 to 80 percent, depending on your age — is explained by genetic differences.
     
    Regardless, I tire of your refusal to answer questions. You would argue that there's no such thing the color yellow because we can define yellow differently. You're a hack magician using old and tired tricks.

    Are you right or am I right? We won't answer that here or today. The future will. My bet is with history and genetics, but you have your Coke commercial so who's to say.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. @Corvinus
    "We agree there. The future will act a lot more like me than you. You’re a dying breed. I’m the future – for all races in the U.S. It’s inevitable. It’s the nature curve of history."

    No, it's the other way around. You really wish upon a star...

    https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/06/28/diversity-defines-the-millennial-generation

    Btw, since you brought up the Jews, what’s your feeling toward American Jews. I would think that you’d be hanging out on the comments section of Jewish publications since we sad racist whites could only dream of their level of ethnic cohesion and organization.

    So, Actor Who Plays Corvinus, what are your thoughts on American Jews and why are wasting your time here instead of berating American Jews on their lack of we-are-the-world philosophy?

    Personally, I love them and want to emulate them. So why are you here? You should be far too busy writing your boilerplate pseudo libertarian rantings against them.

    Hmm. Seems odd. Please give me a long diatribe against the tribe since they’re exactly how we’d like to be except they’re already there.

    Please, feel free to write all that you want. Or is that you don’t want to bite the hand that feeds you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Please, feel free to write all that you want. Or is that you don’t want to bite the hand that feeds you."

    Again, it's easier and comforting for you to believe Jews are around the corner and up in the rafters
    just waiting to pounce on you. So, those who question your positions are simply labeled "Jews" or there are inferences made, like the one here, about my apparent "master". When, in reality, you are a slave to your own designs.

    "Btw, since you brought up the Jews, what’s your feeling toward American Jews."

    They are like any other group in our nation. They have their voting blocs, they have their deplorables, they have their shining stars.

    "So, Actor Who Plays Corvinus, what are your thoughts on American Jews and why are wasting your time here instead of berating American Jews on their lack of we-are-the-world philosophy?"

    Assuming that Jews in their near entirety are simply scheming as globalists--of course they are hiding in plain view--hell bent on indoctrinating the unwashed masses with Cultural Marxism.

    Again, how do YOU know better than the average American white man and woman? Why are YOU immune to ignorance compared to your brethren?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Wally says:
    @Langley
    'African Americans continue to have the highest incidence, prevalence and mortality rates from chronic diseases like cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity, and issues like HIV/AIDS continue to overwhelm the Black community more so than any other racial or ethnic group.”

    The above are caused by behavior and genetics. Not Evil White Men.

    "Who would have predicted all the fuss about statues of Robert E. Lee or that professional football players could occupy center stage in a public discussion over racial inequality? Or that black actors would demand Oscars by racial quota? Moreover, the openness of American politics makes it crackpot friendly, a condition reinforced by a novelty obsessed mass media and the material rewards awaiting the next Al Sharpton."

    William Luther Pierce?

    But don’t ya know:

    “White folks was in the caves while we [blacks] was building empires … We built pyramids before Donald Trump ever knew what architecture was … we taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”
    – Al Sharpton

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Sharpton got that from a book of lies and falsehood propaganda titled “ Black Athena”. It was written by a Jew professor named Bernal at Ivy League Cornell. Every word was a lie and easily refuted

    But it became a best seller and every college prof in the land believes every word
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. SMK says: • Website
    @Jake
    Exactly.

    Almost all black people assume that if blacks take over something that is already successful, that they will keep it that way. They pay no attention to actual failures, to black failure after black failure. It is like a magic belief for them: if they take it over, nothing will be lost.

    And if something is lost, well, obviously white racism, not black failure, caused it.

    And here is the really funny part: white Liberals hold the same childish faith in magic that blacks do. High IQ white liberals, Jews and Gentiles, have the same faith in magic that low IQ blacks have.

    In the real world: whatever city, whatever school system, whatever country, blacks take over will begin to decay into Haiti or Zimbabwe or Detroit within a few months.

    For nearly all black and left-liberals, Democrats and Republicans, and even mainstream, respectable conservatives, the transformation of Detroit from the “Paris of the West” to the worst large city in the U.S. had nothing to do with biology, with innate racial group differences, and everything to do with culture and politics and the magic and curse of “racism” and the “legacy of slavery and segregation.” Magically, the further blacks and whites are removed from slavery and segregation, the less “racist” (whatever that now means exactly) whites and society becomes, the worse it gets in regard to charges of “racism” and “white supremacy,” and now “white privilege, the more blacks hate whites for reasons that are trivial or purely imaginary, and the worse they behave, criminally and otherwise, in most respects.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    Mainstream Republicans and Fox News Conservatives blame the Democrats for Detroit, ignoring the fact that there are nice towns run by the Dems.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. joef says:

    Nothing will change because collectively as a society, we will never hold the afro american accountable. Holding them accountable does not mean a desire to destroy the afro, as leftist mythology proclaims. Holding afros accountable is to keep them from destroying us (economically, physically, and culturally). We as a polite society refuse to have the integrity to hold afros accountable, for fear of being politically incorrect.

    But nature/economics will be more unforgiving for allowing afros to far exceed their useful economic carrying capacity. This will eventually result in an involuntary hard economic reset back to sustainable levels, and the afros infantile understanding of economics will cause them to revolt when this occurs. We can choose to try to appease the afros, however this will not be possible indefinitely. Eventually the bill will come due at the end (and the longer we delay, the larger the bill will be).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  70. anarchyst says:

    …it will NEVER be enough for blacks…both special “civil-rights (for some)” laws and “affirmative action”, contract set-asides, scholarships for blacks only, and all other preferences based solely on race will still be around a hundred years from now. By the politicians allowing this sorry excuse for a race, this dysfunctional minority to dictate to us whites, destroying OUR history, they are prodding a “sleeping giant”. PUSHBACK IS COMING. The racial hatred that blacks have for us whites is self-destructive and will do them no good. Whatever happened to “equality of opportunity?? It has been replaced with “equality of results” (quotas) which NEVER works.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    One can but hope that pushback is coming. I’ve been looking for a counter revolution for decades. It’s nice to think about, but I doubt it will ever happen.

    The core of the problem is the unelected judiciary at every level. Getting the judiciary under control of the elected executive branch is the only way Whites can save ourselves from extermination
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. anarchyst says:

    I WAS PRESENT at the so-called “civil-rights” demonstrations of the 1960s and observed much criminal behavior that never got reported. You see, then as is now, the news media, communists and their fellow travelers had an agenda of their own and as such, could not “let a crisis go to waste”. The rapes, robberies, and the general trashing of the areas they occupied were never reported. Only the reactions of the local citizenry and law enforcement to the lawless behavior of the “demonstrators” was reported…
    These demonstrations were not peaceful by any means, the demonstrators being “egged on” by their new york-based jew “carpetbagger” handlers. The locals, both black and white, wanted NOTHING to do with these “outsiders” coming into their peaceful communities, who were there only to cause trouble. As most of the “civil-rights” handlers were new york-based leftist jews, we had a saying: “Behind every Negro, there is a jew”…
    I WAS THERE, and personally witnesses the criminal activity by these so-called “civil-rights (for some)” pioneers…
    Of course, the “mainstream media” could not afford to “let a crisis go to waste” and conveniently turned off their movie cameras and recording equipment during the numerous acts of violence by the demonstrators.
    Their agenda, then was the same as it is now…wait till the government eviscerates the first amendment (with today’s journalists approval).
    So-called “journalists” are pushing a “licensing scheme” (by the government) that would establish who a “real” journalist is…their goal is to get rid of the numerous bloggers, who, quite often, outscoop the mainstream media…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  72. Ben Frank says:

    The progressives are hiding the past, because history is truth, and progressivism cannot survive around truth. The word for African Americans was “Negro” until the 1970s. By banning that word, they have hidden hundreds of years of history. Wikipedia says “Negro superseded colored as the most polite word for African Americans at a time when black was considered more offensive.”

    Who now reads George Washington Carver, Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. Dubois and Booker T. Washington? For example Dubois in 1904 commented on the following claim:
    ‘“The Negro is three times as criminal as a native white, and one and a half as criminal as the foreign white, consisting in many cases of the scum of Europe.” Negro criminality is undoubtedly far greater than white, and I have little doubt that the foregoing statement is substantially, though not numerically, correct.’

    http://scua.library.umass.edu/digital/dubois/dubois9.pdf

    This disproved “disparate impact” more than a century ago.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  73. Corvinus says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Read history, my friend.

    People like you have existed forever. They always do well in the hothouse until . . .

    “Read history, my friend.”

    More than you can even comprehend.

    “People like you have existed forever. They always do well in the hothouse until . . .”

    Until what? You and your homies with torches and pitchforks just itching for a race war? N—–, please.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Corvinus says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Btw, since you brought up the Jews, what's your feeling toward American Jews. I would think that you'd be hanging out on the comments section of Jewish publications since we sad racist whites could only dream of their level of ethnic cohesion and organization.

    So, Actor Who Plays Corvinus, what are your thoughts on American Jews and why are wasting your time here instead of berating American Jews on their lack of we-are-the-world philosophy?

    Personally, I love them and want to emulate them. So why are you here? You should be far too busy writing your boilerplate pseudo libertarian rantings against them.

    Hmm. Seems odd. Please give me a long diatribe against the tribe since they're exactly how we'd like to be except they're already there.

    Please, feel free to write all that you want. Or is that you don't want to bite the hand that feeds you.

    “Please, feel free to write all that you want. Or is that you don’t want to bite the hand that feeds you.”

    Again, it’s easier and comforting for you to believe Jews are around the corner and up in the rafters
    just waiting to pounce on you. So, those who question your positions are simply labeled “Jews” or there are inferences made, like the one here, about my apparent “master”. When, in reality, you are a slave to your own designs.

    “Btw, since you brought up the Jews, what’s your feeling toward American Jews.”

    They are like any other group in our nation. They have their voting blocs, they have their deplorables, they have their shining stars.

    “So, Actor Who Plays Corvinus, what are your thoughts on American Jews and why are wasting your time here instead of berating American Jews on their lack of we-are-the-world philosophy?”

    Assuming that Jews in their near entirety are simply scheming as globalists–of course they are hiding in plain view–hell bent on indoctrinating the unwashed masses with Cultural Marxism.

    Again, how do YOU know better than the average American white man and woman? Why are YOU immune to ignorance compared to your brethren?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You are awesome at not answering direct questions. Do you get paid by the word, the number of replies, the amount of words in the replies?

    Just kidding.

    But I tire of your games. Time to see if you can be an honest man. Can you Corny? If not, let's all move on. Here are a few clear questions. Please give a one-word answer to each. (You're insufferable verbage needs to be reigned in. Simplicity is honestly after all.)


    1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people? (And if you use the "there's no such color red because there are different shades, I'm done with you forever because you're just too deceitful.)

    2. Do you believe that genetics play a role - a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada - in IQ and other behavioral traits?

    3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?

    4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups - assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races? (You would answer, No, if you don't believe genes are responsible for these traits.)

    5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live.

    6. Do you believe any race is "superior" in the eyes of God?


    Here are my answers.

    1. Yes
    2. Yes
    3. Yes
    4. Yes
    5. Yes
    6. No

    Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Corvinus says:
    @anonymous
    Yep, you’re a B+ troll.

    “Yep, you’re a B+ troll.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. @Corvinus
    "The diversity scheme has always been dominated by white people, especially white queers, Jews, Zionist, and Feminist."

    Diversity is other than a scheme. It is a component of our human nature. Unless you mean how the Britons, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Frisians, Romans, Danes, and Normas were deracinated in similar fashion as they got all tangled and twisted to create the English people, that bastion of Western Civilization?

    "Your kind, the BLM and Antifa and Neocon style thugs, are violent hypocrites that endlessly demand more federal entitlements because you are smarmy, shameless criminals."

    My kind is human. BLM, Antifa, Neocon...that's not my in-group.

    "The world is a big place, and your kind is free to leave and establish a totalitarian victim cult entitlement utopia elsewhere."

    Like the Alt Right?

    Diversity in accordance with the US constitution is 50 different state political solutions that are customized by and peculiar to the people of each state.

    In contrast, the leftist version of diversity is illicit totalitarian federal nonsense.

    Leftist have stolen state-people powers that are recognized in the US constitution 9th and 10th amendments.

    Read More
    • Agree: MBlanc46
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Diversity in accordance with the US constitution is 50 different state political solutions that are customized by and peculiar to the people of each state."

    No, diversity in accordance with the United States Constitution, by which the citizens of the 50 states have a say in such federal matters. Remember, southrons had their "state political solution"--Jim Crow. They flew too close to the sun, and got burned. Deservedly so.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. @Corvinus
    "Prove white racism."

    Actually, it's prove racism. All groups of people have individuals who are racist. Unfortunately, the Coalition of the Right Fringe and the Coalition of the Left Fringe co-opt this term for their own designs. The normies, however, clearly understand racism exists even today despite your head in the sand approach.

    "I have a lots of evidence on my side that this underperformance is at least partially genetic."

    How one interprets that evidence is the source of that controversy.

    "The unraveling of our DNA shows that genes impact our intelligence and that genes are highly heretible. Twin studies show the same thing."

    With environment apparently playing a decided role. Chicken or egg?

    http://people.virginia.edu/~ent3c/papers2/Turkheimer%20psychological%20science.pdf

    "What proof do you have that black underachievement to whites (and whites to NE Asians) is not heavily genetic?"

    https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/the-heritability-of-intelligence-not-what-you-think

    https://medium.com/neodotlife/intelligence-genes-eb18c5ef759c

    http://bostonreview.net/science-nature-race/ned-block-race-genes-and-iq

    You are hilarious. You’re linking to papers that agree with me, except the one written in 1995, and his arguments about indirect heritability are laughable and are never seen anymore, i.e you really had to work to dig up this garbage. C’mon Corny, you can do better.

    To be clear: these findings do not mean that differences in intelligence are entirely determined by culture. Numerous researchers have found that the structure of cognitive abilities is strongly influenced by genes (although we haven’t the foggiest idea which genes are reliably important).

    Actually, we are beginning to discover those genes.

    Researchers have long known that intelligence is highly heritable, meaning much of the difference between your IQ and someone else’s — about 40 to 80 percent, depending on your age — is explained by genetic differences.

    Regardless, I tire of your refusal to answer questions. You would argue that there’s no such thing the color yellow because we can define yellow differently. You’re a hack magician using old and tired tricks.

    Are you right or am I right? We won’t answer that here or today. The future will. My bet is with history and genetics, but you have your Coke commercial so who’s to say.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "You’re linking to papers that agree with me..."

    Agree to the extent that biological and environmental factors are in play and that traits are capable of being inherited or of passing by inheritance. Otherwise, the following links I provided offered nuance.

    "except the one written in 1995, and his arguments about indirect heritability are laughable and are never seen anymore."

    Block's work about "indirect heritability" is visible.

    http://www.nature.com/hdy/journal/v110/n1/full/hdy201256a.html

    https://gsejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1297-9686-46-30

    http://evolutionaryecologymq.com/papers/lynch_2017_interpreting.pdf

    "You would argue that there’s no such thing the color yellow because we can define yellow differently."

    No, I would argue that of course there is the color yellow. But there are also various shades of yellow. One has to be clear as to what shade of yellow one is discussing. It's called context.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. hyperbola says:
    @Corvinus
    "The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding."

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.

    Oh really? Then why are members of a certain racist-supremacist, mideast sect tgetting rich off the “civil rights movement”?

    SPLC transferring millions to offshore tax havens: Report

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/1/splc-transferred-millions-offshore-tax-havens/

    Exposing the Southern Poverty Law Center, Part III: Corrupt Connections

    http://www.resistancemedia.org/2017/05/exposing-southern-poverty-law-center.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. @Corvinus
    "Please, feel free to write all that you want. Or is that you don’t want to bite the hand that feeds you."

    Again, it's easier and comforting for you to believe Jews are around the corner and up in the rafters
    just waiting to pounce on you. So, those who question your positions are simply labeled "Jews" or there are inferences made, like the one here, about my apparent "master". When, in reality, you are a slave to your own designs.

    "Btw, since you brought up the Jews, what’s your feeling toward American Jews."

    They are like any other group in our nation. They have their voting blocs, they have their deplorables, they have their shining stars.

    "So, Actor Who Plays Corvinus, what are your thoughts on American Jews and why are wasting your time here instead of berating American Jews on their lack of we-are-the-world philosophy?"

    Assuming that Jews in their near entirety are simply scheming as globalists--of course they are hiding in plain view--hell bent on indoctrinating the unwashed masses with Cultural Marxism.

    Again, how do YOU know better than the average American white man and woman? Why are YOU immune to ignorance compared to your brethren?

    You are awesome at not answering direct questions. Do you get paid by the word, the number of replies, the amount of words in the replies?

    Just kidding.

    But I tire of your games. Time to see if you can be an honest man. Can you Corny? If not, let’s all move on. Here are a few clear questions. Please give a one-word answer to each. (You’re insufferable verbage needs to be reigned in. Simplicity is honestly after all.)

    1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people? (And if you use the “there’s no such color red because there are different shades, I’m done with you forever because you’re just too deceitful.)

    2. Do you believe that genetics play a role – a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada – in IQ and other behavioral traits?

    3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?

    4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups – assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races? (You would answer, No, if you don’t believe genes are responsible for these traits.)

    5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live.

    6. Do you believe any race is “superior” in the eyes of God?

    Here are my answers.

    1. Yes
    2. Yes
    3. Yes
    4. Yes
    5. Yes
    6. No

    Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Ha! Silly me. Meant "No" on question 4. Added one at the last minute. Screwed me up.

    Anyway, one-word answers Corny.
    , @Corvinus
    "You are awesome at not answering direct questions."

    I answered the questions posed. You are just not fond of the responses.

    "Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word."

    I will feel free to give whatever response I chose, considering the questions posed require other than simplistic answers. Just because your wife bosses you around does not mean you can take out your frustrations on this fine blog.

    "1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people?"

    Races exist. Race is biological, but it is also a human construct. It took someone to "label" it. For example, the California spotted owl is an animal. The name of the creature is a human designation—strix occidentalis. That is, binomial nomenclature refers to a formal system, developed by people, to name things, in this case a species. The California owl was not a “California owl” until someone actually and specifically attached a name to it. Likewise, races were labeled in such a fashion.

    "2. Do you believe that genetics play a role – a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada – in IQ and other behavioral traits?"

    As I stated before, genetics and environmental factors play a role in behavioral traits. It's just that there is argument as to which is more influential AND whether certain races undeniably possess particular traits generally due to those factors, like high IQ or high time preferences.

    "3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?"

    Of course traits are capable of being inherited or of passing by inheritance. Again, there has been significant controversy in the scientific community about the heritability of specific characteristics.

    "4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups – assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races?"

    There are racial and ethnic disparities say, for example, in health status that are genetically based.

    "5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live."

    It would appear environmental and cultural attributes, as well as genetic factors, are involved in long-term adaptation to high altitude.

    6. Do you believe any race is “superior” in the eyes of God?

    The human race is what most matters.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You are awesome at not answering direct questions. Do you get paid by the word, the number of replies, the amount of words in the replies?

    Just kidding.

    But I tire of your games. Time to see if you can be an honest man. Can you Corny? If not, let's all move on. Here are a few clear questions. Please give a one-word answer to each. (You're insufferable verbage needs to be reigned in. Simplicity is honestly after all.)


    1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people? (And if you use the "there's no such color red because there are different shades, I'm done with you forever because you're just too deceitful.)

    2. Do you believe that genetics play a role - a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada - in IQ and other behavioral traits?

    3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?

    4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups - assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races? (You would answer, No, if you don't believe genes are responsible for these traits.)

    5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live.

    6. Do you believe any race is "superior" in the eyes of God?


    Here are my answers.

    1. Yes
    2. Yes
    3. Yes
    4. Yes
    5. Yes
    6. No

    Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word.

    Ha! Silly me. Meant “No” on question 4. Added one at the last minute. Screwed me up.

    Anyway, one-word answers Corny.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. @Issac
    "Who would have predicted all the fuss about statues of Robert E. Lee or that professional football players could occupy center stage in a public discussion over racial inequality?"

    Anyone with more than trivial exposure to black communities. Civil rights would be rolled back tomorrow if the gilded liberals who defend them were made to live within walking distance.

    Disingenuous white liberals and sanctimonious white conservatives love blacks and the further away they live, the more they love them.

    I once remarked to a Jewish friend that one of the reasons why Jews tend to be liberal is because they tend to be affluent and so can escape the consequences of their purported idealism. She agreed with me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. @Jake
    Exactly.

    Almost all black people assume that if blacks take over something that is already successful, that they will keep it that way. They pay no attention to actual failures, to black failure after black failure. It is like a magic belief for them: if they take it over, nothing will be lost.

    And if something is lost, well, obviously white racism, not black failure, caused it.

    And here is the really funny part: white Liberals hold the same childish faith in magic that blacks do. High IQ white liberals, Jews and Gentiles, have the same faith in magic that low IQ blacks have.

    In the real world: whatever city, whatever school system, whatever country, blacks take over will begin to decay into Haiti or Zimbabwe or Detroit within a few months.

    That’s true of other third world groups that have their eyes on part or all of the USA, namely Mexicans and Moslems. They are both too arrogant and stupid to realize that wherever they takeover, it’ll quickly turn into a replica of the homeland that they fled.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. @Wally
    Is that why black dysfunction & ignorance is greater than ever .... in spite of billions & billions of white dollars, preferences, set-asides, 'affirmative action', being thrown at it?

    You must have voted for Hillary.

    The majority of black babies are born to the dregs of black society. They set the tone of black society.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. @MBlanc46
    That first paragraph is pure gold. Blacks used to be (mostly) productive citizens. Recognizing their cognitive limitations, we might have made a greater effort to raise their standard of living. Instead, we accepted the dogma of racial equality, automated many of the jobs that blacks used to do, and imported a mass of the Third Worlders to do even more of those jobs.

    I seem to remember Thomas Sowell writing that the Federal Government has been tracking labor force participation since 1954 and that black men, women and teenagers were more likely to be in the workface than whites and that the rates have declined since then.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    There was a Chicago Tribune article about it a few years ago. In the 1950s, blacks had a slightly higher labor force participation rate than blacks..
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. @SMK
    For nearly all black and left-liberals, Democrats and Republicans, and even mainstream, respectable conservatives, the transformation of Detroit from the "Paris of the West" to the worst large city in the U.S. had nothing to do with biology, with innate racial group differences, and everything to do with culture and politics and the magic and curse of "racism" and the "legacy of slavery and segregation." Magically, the further blacks and whites are removed from slavery and segregation, the less "racist" (whatever that now means exactly) whites and society becomes, the worse it gets in regard to charges of "racism" and "white supremacy," and now "white privilege, the more blacks hate whites for reasons that are trivial or purely imaginary, and the worse they behave, criminally and otherwise, in most respects.

    Mainstream Republicans and Fox News Conservatives blame the Democrats for Detroit, ignoring the fact that there are nice towns run by the Dems.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. Corvinus says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You are awesome at not answering direct questions. Do you get paid by the word, the number of replies, the amount of words in the replies?

    Just kidding.

    But I tire of your games. Time to see if you can be an honest man. Can you Corny? If not, let's all move on. Here are a few clear questions. Please give a one-word answer to each. (You're insufferable verbage needs to be reigned in. Simplicity is honestly after all.)


    1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people? (And if you use the "there's no such color red because there are different shades, I'm done with you forever because you're just too deceitful.)

    2. Do you believe that genetics play a role - a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada - in IQ and other behavioral traits?

    3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?

    4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups - assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races? (You would answer, No, if you don't believe genes are responsible for these traits.)

    5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live.

    6. Do you believe any race is "superior" in the eyes of God?


    Here are my answers.

    1. Yes
    2. Yes
    3. Yes
    4. Yes
    5. Yes
    6. No

    Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word.

    “You are awesome at not answering direct questions.”

    I answered the questions posed. You are just not fond of the responses.

    “Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word.”

    I will feel free to give whatever response I chose, considering the questions posed require other than simplistic answers. Just because your wife bosses you around does not mean you can take out your frustrations on this fine blog.

    “1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people?”

    Races exist. Race is biological, but it is also a human construct. It took someone to “label” it. For example, the California spotted owl is an animal. The name of the creature is a human designation—strix occidentalis. That is, binomial nomenclature refers to a formal system, developed by people, to name things, in this case a species. The California owl was not a “California owl” until someone actually and specifically attached a name to it. Likewise, races were labeled in such a fashion.

    “2. Do you believe that genetics play a role – a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada – in IQ and other behavioral traits?”

    As I stated before, genetics and environmental factors play a role in behavioral traits. It’s just that there is argument as to which is more influential AND whether certain races undeniably possess particular traits generally due to those factors, like high IQ or high time preferences.

    “3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?”

    Of course traits are capable of being inherited or of passing by inheritance. Again, there has been significant controversy in the scientific community about the heritability of specific characteristics.

    “4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups – assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races?”

    There are racial and ethnic disparities say, for example, in health status that are genetically based.

    “5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live.”

    It would appear environmental and cultural attributes, as well as genetic factors, are involved in long-term adaptation to high altitude.

    6. Do you believe any race is “superior” in the eyes of God?

    The human race is what most matters.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    I knew that you couldn't do it. (My apologies for setting a trap. I really did hope that you would prove to be an honest man.)

    Farewell, Corny.
    , @Alden
    Actually, it’s not The California Spotted Owl. They were always called spotted owls and they live all over the country.

    It was just a dispute between a Goldman Sachs subsidiary clear cutting lumber company and environmentalists wishing to preserve the redwood forests in California that made the spotted owl famous.

    You are as ignorant about owls as you are about crime and who commits most of it
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Corvinus says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    You are hilarious. You're linking to papers that agree with me, except the one written in 1995, and his arguments about indirect heritability are laughable and are never seen anymore, i.e you really had to work to dig up this garbage. C'mon Corny, you can do better.

    To be clear: these findings do not mean that differences in intelligence are entirely determined by culture. Numerous researchers have found that the structure of cognitive abilities is strongly influenced by genes (although we haven't the foggiest idea which genes are reliably important).
     
    Actually, we are beginning to discover those genes.

    Researchers have long known that intelligence is highly heritable, meaning much of the difference between your IQ and someone else’s — about 40 to 80 percent, depending on your age — is explained by genetic differences.
     
    Regardless, I tire of your refusal to answer questions. You would argue that there's no such thing the color yellow because we can define yellow differently. You're a hack magician using old and tired tricks.

    Are you right or am I right? We won't answer that here or today. The future will. My bet is with history and genetics, but you have your Coke commercial so who's to say.

    “You’re linking to papers that agree with me…”

    Agree to the extent that biological and environmental factors are in play and that traits are capable of being inherited or of passing by inheritance. Otherwise, the following links I provided offered nuance.

    “except the one written in 1995, and his arguments about indirect heritability are laughable and are never seen anymore.”

    Block’s work about “indirect heritability” is visible.

    http://www.nature.com/hdy/journal/v110/n1/full/hdy201256a.html

    https://gsejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1297-9686-46-30

    http://evolutionaryecologymq.com/papers/lynch_2017_interpreting.pdf

    “You would argue that there’s no such thing the color yellow because we can define yellow differently.”

    No, I would argue that of course there is the color yellow. But there are also various shades of yellow. One has to be clear as to what shade of yellow one is discussing. It’s called context.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Corvinus says:
    @Joe Franklin
    Diversity in accordance with the US constitution is 50 different state political solutions that are customized by and peculiar to the people of each state.

    In contrast, the leftist version of diversity is illicit totalitarian federal nonsense.

    Leftist have stolen state-people powers that are recognized in the US constitution 9th and 10th amendments.

    “Diversity in accordance with the US constitution is 50 different state political solutions that are customized by and peculiar to the people of each state.”

    No, diversity in accordance with the United States Constitution, by which the citizens of the 50 states have a say in such federal matters. Remember, southrons had their “state political solution”–Jim Crow. They flew too close to the sun, and got burned. Deservedly so.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. @Corvinus
    "You are awesome at not answering direct questions."

    I answered the questions posed. You are just not fond of the responses.

    "Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word."

    I will feel free to give whatever response I chose, considering the questions posed require other than simplistic answers. Just because your wife bosses you around does not mean you can take out your frustrations on this fine blog.

    "1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people?"

    Races exist. Race is biological, but it is also a human construct. It took someone to "label" it. For example, the California spotted owl is an animal. The name of the creature is a human designation—strix occidentalis. That is, binomial nomenclature refers to a formal system, developed by people, to name things, in this case a species. The California owl was not a “California owl” until someone actually and specifically attached a name to it. Likewise, races were labeled in such a fashion.

    "2. Do you believe that genetics play a role – a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada – in IQ and other behavioral traits?"

    As I stated before, genetics and environmental factors play a role in behavioral traits. It's just that there is argument as to which is more influential AND whether certain races undeniably possess particular traits generally due to those factors, like high IQ or high time preferences.

    "3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?"

    Of course traits are capable of being inherited or of passing by inheritance. Again, there has been significant controversy in the scientific community about the heritability of specific characteristics.

    "4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups – assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races?"

    There are racial and ethnic disparities say, for example, in health status that are genetically based.

    "5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live."

    It would appear environmental and cultural attributes, as well as genetic factors, are involved in long-term adaptation to high altitude.

    6. Do you believe any race is “superior” in the eyes of God?

    The human race is what most matters.

    I knew that you couldn’t do it. (My apologies for setting a trap. I really did hope that you would prove to be an honest man.)

    Farewell, Corny.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "I knew that you couldn’t do it. (My apologies for setting a trap. I really did hope that you would prove to be an honest man.)"

    Of course I am being honest, as I realized your game playing, which is exactly why I offered more substantial responses. Your questions required it.

    You lose.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. Corvinus says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    I knew that you couldn't do it. (My apologies for setting a trap. I really did hope that you would prove to be an honest man.)

    Farewell, Corny.

    “I knew that you couldn’t do it. (My apologies for setting a trap. I really did hope that you would prove to be an honest man.)”

    Of course I am being honest, as I realized your game playing, which is exactly why I offered more substantial responses. Your questions required it.

    You lose.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    You are not going to convince anyone here who has really experienced blacks that honesty about blacks is racism.

    So why keep posting? You remind me of every Jewish liberal I’ve ever known. It’s just the standard propaganda instilled in liberals. It’s like kids reciting the pledge of allegiance or some standard salesman’s spiel or prayers in church.

    You memorized the propaganda long ago and can type it without even thinking. I’ve heard it all my life.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. MBlanc46 says:
    @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    I seem to remember Thomas Sowell writing that the Federal Government has been tracking labor force participation since 1954 and that black men, women and teenagers were more likely to be in the workface than whites and that the rates have declined since then.

    There was a Chicago Tribune article about it a few years ago. In the 1950s, blacks had a slightly higher labor force participation rate than blacks..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. @Corvinus
    "The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding."

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.

    “Pursuing black equal rights” is nothing but a delusion of the uninformed imperial elitists of Washington n the northeast, n always has been. Whites in the south, n in the working classes of the rest of the US, have always had to defend tbemselves from a steady onslaught of black crime that the elite controlled media have always attempted to suppress.

    Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor’s 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison.

    Most of these are not reported because everyone knows its a waste of time n the accused will soon just be back on the street. This is the permanent state of siege that the elites in Washington have forced on the south n on the white working class in this country n which the media actively silences. We know that the government is alien n useless n that we have no defense but our own guns. If it weren’t for blacks, we would have almost no violent crime at all.

    Now that you are now better informed than before, maybe you can re-evaluate your opinions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    Yes, you have a substantial experience in racial reality that polite company refuses to acknowledge, and to which most afros consider it pay back time for the misbegotten gains of fake white privilege. Me myself, and most of the Whites/Hispanics I grew up with, have had similar bad experiences (as most others in the boswash/rustbelt city neighborhoods) Despite my neighborhood responding back with street justice, there was a long retreat from white flight, to the eventual afro ruination of the neighborhoods.

    The unfortunate effect from this is now the children of these white fight refugees have no idea what their parents escaped from. The first mistake of the white flight refugees was to allow the suburban school system to inculcate their children in white guilt propaganda. Many of these pathologically naive millennials now must relearn, what we already learned before at a great price. By shielding them, we actually made them more vulnerable to afro aggression, scams, and falsehoods.

    I remember when they desegregated my middle school by federal mandate in the late 70s. The afros were already 14 to 18, while we were 11 to 13, years of age. Guns and drugs were brought to school. Kids were routinely robbed at knife point, or gang assaulted, and the only response by the school administration was "if you make up that racist story again about you being robbed, we will suspend you!". Of course the school system did not want to be in contempt of Federal court, so they made it work at our expense, even when it disrupted their primary mission of providing an academic education.

    The result was what I lost in formal education, I made up in becoming very street smart in racial realism. The second result was I readily dismissed the nonsense peddled by the MSM, & academics (who pontificate from afar), about how the afros were victims of oppression. And the other result is that I became suspicious of official govt statements, knowing that they are willing to lie to keep this racial afro fraud going (no matter the economic cost, and the amount of non afro victims generated).

    Of course the demands are for us to deny our own experiences, and to ignore afro antisocial/parasitical behavior, claiming that it will get better. And of course for the last 50 years it has only gotten much much worse. I do not believe this nation will survive another 50 years of this, and when every metro area is in economic default, full of urban decay, it will be too late to correct.

    If the afros are figuratively at our throats now, when we are giving them everything, what will happen when we can no longer afford to pay for it? The answer is clear except to the polite company who chooses to ignore it, and claim we are the actual problem instead. The problem of daily afro domestic terrorism is our biggest national crisis, and everything else in comparison is just mere distraction. We did not choose for this to happen, the afros did (and if they choose to: undo) ; all we can do is make the appropriate responses (which right now we are collectively unwilling to do).

    , @Corvinus
    "Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor’s 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison."

    Made up experiences. Carry on...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. joef says:
    @Sin City Milla
    "Pursuing black equal rights" is nothing but a delusion of the uninformed imperial elitists of Washington n the northeast, n always has been. Whites in the south, n in the working classes of the rest of the US, have always had to defend tbemselves from a steady onslaught of black crime that the elite controlled media have always attempted to suppress.

    Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor's 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison.

    Most of these are not reported because everyone knows its a waste of time n the accused will soon just be back on the street. This is the permanent state of siege that the elites in Washington have forced on the south n on the white working class in this country n which the media actively silences. We know that the government is alien n useless n that we have no defense but our own guns. If it weren't for blacks, we would have almost no violent crime at all.

    Now that you are now better informed than before, maybe you can re-evaluate your opinions.

    Yes, you have a substantial experience in racial reality that polite company refuses to acknowledge, and to which most afros consider it pay back time for the misbegotten gains of fake white privilege. Me myself, and most of the Whites/Hispanics I grew up with, have had similar bad experiences (as most others in the boswash/rustbelt city neighborhoods) Despite my neighborhood responding back with street justice, there was a long retreat from white flight, to the eventual afro ruination of the neighborhoods.

    The unfortunate effect from this is now the children of these white fight refugees have no idea what their parents escaped from. The first mistake of the white flight refugees was to allow the suburban school system to inculcate their children in white guilt propaganda. Many of these pathologically naive millennials now must relearn, what we already learned before at a great price. By shielding them, we actually made them more vulnerable to afro aggression, scams, and falsehoods.

    I remember when they desegregated my middle school by federal mandate in the late 70s. The afros were already 14 to 18, while we were 11 to 13, years of age. Guns and drugs were brought to school. Kids were routinely robbed at knife point, or gang assaulted, and the only response by the school administration was “if you make up that racist story again about you being robbed, we will suspend you!”. Of course the school system did not want to be in contempt of Federal court, so they made it work at our expense, even when it disrupted their primary mission of providing an academic education.

    The result was what I lost in formal education, I made up in becoming very street smart in racial realism. The second result was I readily dismissed the nonsense peddled by the MSM, & academics (who pontificate from afar), about how the afros were victims of oppression. And the other result is that I became suspicious of official govt statements, knowing that they are willing to lie to keep this racial afro fraud going (no matter the economic cost, and the amount of non afro victims generated).

    Of course the demands are for us to deny our own experiences, and to ignore afro antisocial/parasitical behavior, claiming that it will get better. And of course for the last 50 years it has only gotten much much worse. I do not believe this nation will survive another 50 years of this, and when every metro area is in economic default, full of urban decay, it will be too late to correct.

    If the afros are figuratively at our throats now, when we are giving them everything, what will happen when we can no longer afford to pay for it? The answer is clear except to the polite company who chooses to ignore it, and claim we are the actual problem instead. The problem of daily afro domestic terrorism is our biggest national crisis, and everything else in comparison is just mere distraction. We did not choose for this to happen, the afros did (and if they choose to: undo) ; all we can do is make the appropriate responses (which right now we are collectively unwilling to do).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sin City Milla
    You're quite right. That very thing happened to me. Kids overprotected, inoculated by PC propaganda against hearing new facts or science. I myself am an American nationalist but with global interests, I served on trade delegations to several African countries, so I have black friends who are good kind people, but other black delegates I learned were 100% white haters who loudly stated that "nothing had changed" since the days of slavery. These included the black college professor n the black city officials n the elected (by blacks) city councilman. It is clear that they were mostly Black Nationalists who considered American Nationalists as their mortal enemy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. Corvinus says:
    @Sin City Milla
    "Pursuing black equal rights" is nothing but a delusion of the uninformed imperial elitists of Washington n the northeast, n always has been. Whites in the south, n in the working classes of the rest of the US, have always had to defend tbemselves from a steady onslaught of black crime that the elite controlled media have always attempted to suppress.

    Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor's 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison.

    Most of these are not reported because everyone knows its a waste of time n the accused will soon just be back on the street. This is the permanent state of siege that the elites in Washington have forced on the south n on the white working class in this country n which the media actively silences. We know that the government is alien n useless n that we have no defense but our own guns. If it weren't for blacks, we would have almost no violent crime at all.

    Now that you are now better informed than before, maybe you can re-evaluate your opinions.

    “Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor’s 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison.”

    Made up experiences. Carry on…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sin City Milla
    One more that I missed: my brother in law was run over by a black guy. Several blacks witnessed it but when the police arrived they lied n said he had walked against the light which wasn't true. So he had no case n spent several months in a wheelchair.

    No one is so blind as he who will not see.
    , @Alden
    My son in laws Grandfather had a son. When he was 19 he went to Los Angeles for some reason. A month later he was beaten to death by a gang of blacks.
    This happened in the late 1940’s.

    30 years later my kids formed their opinion of black kids just from riding city buses with them. It was only about 6 blocks before the blacks got off at their school bus stop but my kids observed and heard the screeching, cursing, howling and yowling. And the black girls had babies they brought to the school day care center.

    I suppose it’s vicious racism for 11 and 12 year old White girls to disapprove of 14 and 15 year old black girls with their illegitimate babies.

    But it was the filthy language and howling and yowling that really shocked my kids.

    It’s not just the crime, the destruction of our great cities and affirmative action that causes all other races to dislike blacks.

    It’s their behavior in public. Other races behave differently. Some like Mexican Indians stay quietly in their own space. Some like Persians and Armenians do subtle pushing and shoving. Whites sometimes talk too loudly.

    But no other race exhibits the horrible behavior of blacks in public. They can be heard 2 blocks away over heavy traffic. They constantly step backwards, forwards and sideways, arms and legs flailing about taking up as much space as possible.

    They need to look at themselves.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. @Corvinus
    "Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor’s 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison."

    Made up experiences. Carry on...

    One more that I missed: my brother in law was run over by a black guy. Several blacks witnessed it but when the police arrived they lied n said he had walked against the light which wasn’t true. So he had no case n spent several months in a wheelchair.

    No one is so blind as he who will not see.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    Made up experiences. Carry on…
     
    Of course that accusation is nothing but projection. No one makes up more made up experiences than afro americans with myths of oppression (while living off the fat of the land for the last 50 years with runaway entitlements), and accusations of nonexistent white privilege. I guess all the crime in the FBI uniform crime reporting (and news reports) is just made up as well, or maybe it was just committed by an unknown invisible force, and people Asians/Hispanics/Whites) just claimed it was done by Blacks because of racism?

    This leftist Orwellian denial of the truth cannot prevail against people who had real experience in these matters (you cannot deny your own true life experience when you, & others, know them to be true)... thus, the above statement was really meant for the pathologically naive White person who is always looking for an excuse to give the benefit of the doubt for extreme afro misbehavior.

    But one day, when national bankruptcy looms, and there is no more to give to the ungrateful afro, the luxury of the benefit of the doubt will no longer exist. Racial balkanization plus a deep economic crash equals major unrest. Without a thriving welfare system, the resultant afro initiated race war will leave two options for whitey: fight or die. We did not want this, it is the afro who keeps pushing the nation towards this direction; and it is they who can stop it, by not destroying the social capital of this nation (unfortunately they are too obsessed with hating whitey, and getting something for nothing, for them to change now).

    Afros, (as well as liberals & leftist) have a very immature economic outlook, believing they can get an infinite free lunch from a bottomless economic well forever. But when the economic well finally runs dry, we will all suffer the consequences, from our past attempts to appease unreasonable afro demands. Either afros become productive citizens, or they will be responsible for the economic bring down of the nation, by grossly exceeding their carrying capacity. And when that happens, it will be clear who is responsible for it (no more excuses for the afros then).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. @joef
    Yes, you have a substantial experience in racial reality that polite company refuses to acknowledge, and to which most afros consider it pay back time for the misbegotten gains of fake white privilege. Me myself, and most of the Whites/Hispanics I grew up with, have had similar bad experiences (as most others in the boswash/rustbelt city neighborhoods) Despite my neighborhood responding back with street justice, there was a long retreat from white flight, to the eventual afro ruination of the neighborhoods.

    The unfortunate effect from this is now the children of these white fight refugees have no idea what their parents escaped from. The first mistake of the white flight refugees was to allow the suburban school system to inculcate their children in white guilt propaganda. Many of these pathologically naive millennials now must relearn, what we already learned before at a great price. By shielding them, we actually made them more vulnerable to afro aggression, scams, and falsehoods.

    I remember when they desegregated my middle school by federal mandate in the late 70s. The afros were already 14 to 18, while we were 11 to 13, years of age. Guns and drugs were brought to school. Kids were routinely robbed at knife point, or gang assaulted, and the only response by the school administration was "if you make up that racist story again about you being robbed, we will suspend you!". Of course the school system did not want to be in contempt of Federal court, so they made it work at our expense, even when it disrupted their primary mission of providing an academic education.

    The result was what I lost in formal education, I made up in becoming very street smart in racial realism. The second result was I readily dismissed the nonsense peddled by the MSM, & academics (who pontificate from afar), about how the afros were victims of oppression. And the other result is that I became suspicious of official govt statements, knowing that they are willing to lie to keep this racial afro fraud going (no matter the economic cost, and the amount of non afro victims generated).

    Of course the demands are for us to deny our own experiences, and to ignore afro antisocial/parasitical behavior, claiming that it will get better. And of course for the last 50 years it has only gotten much much worse. I do not believe this nation will survive another 50 years of this, and when every metro area is in economic default, full of urban decay, it will be too late to correct.

    If the afros are figuratively at our throats now, when we are giving them everything, what will happen when we can no longer afford to pay for it? The answer is clear except to the polite company who chooses to ignore it, and claim we are the actual problem instead. The problem of daily afro domestic terrorism is our biggest national crisis, and everything else in comparison is just mere distraction. We did not choose for this to happen, the afros did (and if they choose to: undo) ; all we can do is make the appropriate responses (which right now we are collectively unwilling to do).

    You’re quite right. That very thing happened to me. Kids overprotected, inoculated by PC propaganda against hearing new facts or science. I myself am an American nationalist but with global interests, I served on trade delegations to several African countries, so I have black friends who are good kind people, but other black delegates I learned were 100% white haters who loudly stated that “nothing had changed” since the days of slavery. These included the black college professor n the black city officials n the elected (by blacks) city councilman. It is clear that they were mostly Black Nationalists who considered American Nationalists as their mortal enemy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    so I have black friends who are good kind people
     
    Yes, my experience with Sub Saharan African immigrants is mostly a positive one. I find them productive, pleasant, and civilized. They are nothing like afro americans, and many of the Sub Saharan African immigrants I met, do not have respect for the chronic complaining of afro americans. They explain what afro americans call poverty, is luxury in their home country (that there are no overweight poor people in Africa). And what is a further contradiction is that afro americans do not treat African immigrants kindly (with even other Blacks being subjected to afro american unfettered hatreds).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. joef says:
    @Sin City Milla
    One more that I missed: my brother in law was run over by a black guy. Several blacks witnessed it but when the police arrived they lied n said he had walked against the light which wasn't true. So he had no case n spent several months in a wheelchair.

    No one is so blind as he who will not see.

    Made up experiences. Carry on…

    Of course that accusation is nothing but projection. No one makes up more made up experiences than afro americans with myths of oppression (while living off the fat of the land for the last 50 years with runaway entitlements), and accusations of nonexistent white privilege. I guess all the crime in the FBI uniform crime reporting (and news reports) is just made up as well, or maybe it was just committed by an unknown invisible force, and people Asians/Hispanics/Whites) just claimed it was done by Blacks because of racism?

    This leftist Orwellian denial of the truth cannot prevail against people who had real experience in these matters (you cannot deny your own true life experience when you, & others, know them to be true)… thus, the above statement was really meant for the pathologically naive White person who is always looking for an excuse to give the benefit of the doubt for extreme afro misbehavior.

    But one day, when national bankruptcy looms, and there is no more to give to the ungrateful afro, the luxury of the benefit of the doubt will no longer exist. Racial balkanization plus a deep economic crash equals major unrest. Without a thriving welfare system, the resultant afro initiated race war will leave two options for whitey: fight or die. We did not want this, it is the afro who keeps pushing the nation towards this direction; and it is they who can stop it, by not destroying the social capital of this nation (unfortunately they are too obsessed with hating whitey, and getting something for nothing, for them to change now).

    Afros, (as well as liberals & leftist) have a very immature economic outlook, believing they can get an infinite free lunch from a bottomless economic well forever. But when the economic well finally runs dry, we will all suffer the consequences, from our past attempts to appease unreasonable afro demands. Either afros become productive citizens, or they will be responsible for the economic bring down of the nation, by grossly exceeding their carrying capacity. And when that happens, it will be clear who is responsible for it (no more excuses for the afros then).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. joef says:
    @Sin City Milla
    You're quite right. That very thing happened to me. Kids overprotected, inoculated by PC propaganda against hearing new facts or science. I myself am an American nationalist but with global interests, I served on trade delegations to several African countries, so I have black friends who are good kind people, but other black delegates I learned were 100% white haters who loudly stated that "nothing had changed" since the days of slavery. These included the black college professor n the black city officials n the elected (by blacks) city councilman. It is clear that they were mostly Black Nationalists who considered American Nationalists as their mortal enemy.

    so I have black friends who are good kind people

    Yes, my experience with Sub Saharan African immigrants is mostly a positive one. I find them productive, pleasant, and civilized. They are nothing like afro americans, and many of the Sub Saharan African immigrants I met, do not have respect for the chronic complaining of afro americans. They explain what afro americans call poverty, is luxury in their home country (that there are no overweight poor people in Africa). And what is a further contradiction is that afro americans do not treat African immigrants kindly (with even other Blacks being subjected to afro american unfettered hatreds).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sin City Milla
    My experience with blacks in Africa was that they were almost entirely polite, hard working, n had no ideology of victim hood. When they come here they are surprised by the sense of entitlement n laziness of many American blacks. At least that's what they tell me.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. @Langley
    'African Americans continue to have the highest incidence, prevalence and mortality rates from chronic diseases like cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity, and issues like HIV/AIDS continue to overwhelm the Black community more so than any other racial or ethnic group.”

    The above are caused by behavior and genetics. Not Evil White Men.

    "Who would have predicted all the fuss about statues of Robert E. Lee or that professional football players could occupy center stage in a public discussion over racial inequality? Or that black actors would demand Oscars by racial quota? Moreover, the openness of American politics makes it crackpot friendly, a condition reinforced by a novelty obsessed mass media and the material rewards awaiting the next Al Sharpton."

    William Luther Pierce?

    I think we should let blacks always go first through stop signs even if last to arrive. After all, letting the first to arrive go first is just White Privilege. This won’t be too much of a problem. At every stop sign the drivers can exit their vehicles, categorize each other by race by measuring their respective degrees of melanin, peacefully conclude who should go through the stop sign first, then calmly proceed in the correct order. After all, this merely applies the logic of affirmative action, dictated by our enlightened n unbiased Supreme Court. This approach has worked so well in academia n business for the 60 years that the Court in its wisdom has decided to make it permanent. Only white racists could possibly object.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. @joef

    so I have black friends who are good kind people
     
    Yes, my experience with Sub Saharan African immigrants is mostly a positive one. I find them productive, pleasant, and civilized. They are nothing like afro americans, and many of the Sub Saharan African immigrants I met, do not have respect for the chronic complaining of afro americans. They explain what afro americans call poverty, is luxury in their home country (that there are no overweight poor people in Africa). And what is a further contradiction is that afro americans do not treat African immigrants kindly (with even other Blacks being subjected to afro american unfettered hatreds).

    My experience with blacks in Africa was that they were almost entirely polite, hard working, n had no ideology of victim hood. When they come here they are surprised by the sense of entitlement n laziness of many American blacks. At least that’s what they tell me.

    Read More
    • Agree: joef
    • Replies: @Truth
    It's all a ruse, Sport. we are making you feel comforatable with our darker skinned Brothers in the mean time, then, when the signal to knee-grows is given...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2c32SvJf54
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. Truth says:
    @Sin City Milla
    My experience with blacks in Africa was that they were almost entirely polite, hard working, n had no ideology of victim hood. When they come here they are surprised by the sense of entitlement n laziness of many American blacks. At least that's what they tell me.

    It’s all a ruse, Sport. we are making you feel comforatable with our darker skinned Brothers in the mean time, then, when the signal to knee-grows is given…

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    It’s all a ruse,
     
    If you said it is a ruse by corporatist/neocons helping to instigate racial fears, in the working/middle class, so they will vote Republican; and this is done in order to have a free hand in cheap labor, environmental pollution, and military industrial complex wars (that are not in our national interest), I can somewhat agree with you... however, that does not mean that leftist/afros are innocent of misconduct (by inciting their own leftist hostilities against the working/middle class, the corporatist neocons have an easier sell).

    Basically once side wants to always pay min wage, and the other side wants to tax every cent of it earned, so either way the middle/working class economically losses. Although I do have a particular disdain for hypocritical limo libs who claim to be anti corporatist, but have an investment portfolio with them, and do not mind that the Clinton's make high paid speeches at Goldman Sachs, while limo libs lecture the rest of us on white privilege (yet reside in elitist neighborhoods).

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. Thanks…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  103. joef says:
    @Truth
    It's all a ruse, Sport. we are making you feel comforatable with our darker skinned Brothers in the mean time, then, when the signal to knee-grows is given...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2c32SvJf54

    It’s all a ruse,

    If you said it is a ruse by corporatist/neocons helping to instigate racial fears, in the working/middle class, so they will vote Republican; and this is done in order to have a free hand in cheap labor, environmental pollution, and military industrial complex wars (that are not in our national interest), I can somewhat agree with you… however, that does not mean that leftist/afros are innocent of misconduct (by inciting their own leftist hostilities against the working/middle class, the corporatist neocons have an easier sell).

    Basically once side wants to always pay min wage, and the other side wants to tax every cent of it earned, so either way the middle/working class economically losses. Although I do have a particular disdain for hypocritical limo libs who claim to be anti corporatist, but have an investment portfolio with them, and do not mind that the Clinton’s make high paid speeches at Goldman Sachs, while limo libs lecture the rest of us on white privilege (yet reside in elitist neighborhoods).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Not bad.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Truth says:
    @joef

    It’s all a ruse,
     
    If you said it is a ruse by corporatist/neocons helping to instigate racial fears, in the working/middle class, so they will vote Republican; and this is done in order to have a free hand in cheap labor, environmental pollution, and military industrial complex wars (that are not in our national interest), I can somewhat agree with you... however, that does not mean that leftist/afros are innocent of misconduct (by inciting their own leftist hostilities against the working/middle class, the corporatist neocons have an easier sell).

    Basically once side wants to always pay min wage, and the other side wants to tax every cent of it earned, so either way the middle/working class economically losses. Although I do have a particular disdain for hypocritical limo libs who claim to be anti corporatist, but have an investment portfolio with them, and do not mind that the Clinton's make high paid speeches at Goldman Sachs, while limo libs lecture the rest of us on white privilege (yet reside in elitist neighborhoods).

    Not bad.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. Alden says:
    @Brabantian
    What's missing from the multiple good points made in this article, is the fact that the progressive / leftist incoherence and chaos, is quite oligarch-orchestrated ... as are, e.g., the injustices of the system which are indeed unfairly jailing many minorities for non-violent crimes, plus railroading many minorities into prison via a totally skewered prosecutorial - legal system ... this is not to deny the levels of minority crime, but to point out that the oligarchs have purposefully created a 'justice' system which is an utter farce and in which tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands, are coerced into 'plea bargains' for crimes they personally did not commit

    Chaos and injustice are the oligarch agenda, and the oligarchs' media arms specifically sponsor this as much as the rigged and corrupt United States courts and lawyers ... it is the crazy, corrupt, messed-up organisations which get the media support and funding sponsorship, and that is a core aspect of the game ... set the lower classes against one another, and forever distract from the oligarchs pulling the strings behind the scenes

    It is not a simple matter to address the real problem ... It is hard for most people to digest what is happening, as they are suffering from in-your-face ugly serious life issues, whereas the oligarch string-pullers are distant, hidden and 'theoretical' ... versus the street crime in your face, or your minority family member or friend getting railroaded and jailed

    It’s so obvious you know absolutely nothing about crime, criminals and the criminal justice system other than what you read is some naive pro criminal publication by some lying liberal.

    You don’t even know what plea bargain means do you? Almost all crimes committed are not just one crime but at least 2 usually more than 2 crimes.

    For instance a basic robbery often involves a weapon and a physical attack on the victim which injures the victim. A huge number of rapes happen after the criminal has broken and entered and invaded the victim’s home.

    So the criminal is charged with the several crimes he committed. The criminal then admits guilt of the least serious crime

    Thus instead of getting what he actually deserves, a lengthy sentence for armed robbery with a weapon and serious bodily injury to the victim, the criminal admits guilt only to simple robbery and gets probation and a very short sentence such as one year. Another thing you don’t know about is “ time off for good behavior”
    That means that every prison sentence is automatically cut in half unless the criminal Jill’s someone in prison and has to serve his full sentence.
    You’ve obviously been reading some liberal falsehoods about plea bargains written by a pro criminal ideologue

    Murder 1 often becomes man slaughter or even involuntary manslaughter. A well known case Re that is going on right now in San Francisco. The illegal alien felon who murdered Kate Stienle claims he just sat down on a bench. A gun was just lying there. He just touched the gun and the gun went off by itself killing Ms Stienle.

    The murderer claims involuntary manslaughter. But it was really homicide 2.

    You really should look to the source of what you read. If you’re in law school, 6 months as a public defender will cure you of your naive and ignorant beliefs about plea bargains.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. Alden says:
    @Corvinus
    "The genuine objective of the “Civil Rights Movement” was and is white dispossession and displacement. It was and is succeeding."

    The absolute purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was and is to ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens of our great nation. Remember, it was southrons who repeatedly violated "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case (1896). Americans from different racial, ethnic, and soci0-economic backgrounds responded appropriately to the blatant efforts of southrons to deny blacks their fundamental liberties.

    Blacks always had equal rights in Ohio, Michigan, New York, Illinois. Wisconsin, California and other states north of the Mason Dixon line.

    And look what they did to vast sections of NYC, Akron, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Gary, Chicago, Milwaukee and even Kenosha and Waukegan, Los Angeles, Sacramento and San Francisco.

    Sometimes it took 20 years, sometimes only 10 years before blacks totally destroyed vast sections of those cities. But never more than 20 years.

    I read your arguments in my parents library 60 years ago and got the full propaganda blast in a few college courses. Lucky for me, in the olden days only required sociology and a few other courses taught by commie profs were pro black anti White propaganda.

    Your argument is as old as I am. And it’s all liberal propaganda falsehoods.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. Alden says:
    @Corvinus
    "Just my own experience: knifed at midnight by two black ex-cons who were professionals at mugging; 72 year old mother dragged down the street by a truck when she tried to get her money back from the black man who stole it; son held up at gun point by a gang of blacks who took his jacket n used it to then hold up a convenience store; sister attacked in broad daylight when a black man tried to stuff food down her throat; myself physically threatened by a black store clerk who objected to my buying a newspaper; one bicycle stolen from me by a black guy; an attempt to steal another bicycle; a steady stream of bank robberies n thefts by black men in my neighborhood that has lasted as long as I can remember: neighbor’s 17 year old son shot in the head n killed at his first paying job by a black man just released from prison."

    Made up experiences. Carry on...

    My son in laws Grandfather had a son. When he was 19 he went to Los Angeles for some reason. A month later he was beaten to death by a gang of blacks.
    This happened in the late 1940’s.

    30 years later my kids formed their opinion of black kids just from riding city buses with them. It was only about 6 blocks before the blacks got off at their school bus stop but my kids observed and heard the screeching, cursing, howling and yowling. And the black girls had babies they brought to the school day care center.

    I suppose it’s vicious racism for 11 and 12 year old White girls to disapprove of 14 and 15 year old black girls with their illegitimate babies.

    But it was the filthy language and howling and yowling that really shocked my kids.

    It’s not just the crime, the destruction of our great cities and affirmative action that causes all other races to dislike blacks.

    It’s their behavior in public. Other races behave differently. Some like Mexican Indians stay quietly in their own space. Some like Persians and Armenians do subtle pushing and shoving. Whites sometimes talk too loudly.

    But no other race exhibits the horrible behavior of blacks in public. They can be heard 2 blocks away over heavy traffic. They constantly step backwards, forwards and sideways, arms and legs flailing about taking up as much space as possible.

    They need to look at themselves.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. Alden says:
    @Corvinus
    "I knew that you couldn’t do it. (My apologies for setting a trap. I really did hope that you would prove to be an honest man.)"

    Of course I am being honest, as I realized your game playing, which is exactly why I offered more substantial responses. Your questions required it.

    You lose.

    You are not going to convince anyone here who has really experienced blacks that honesty about blacks is racism.

    So why keep posting? You remind me of every Jewish liberal I’ve ever known. It’s just the standard propaganda instilled in liberals. It’s like kids reciting the pledge of allegiance or some standard salesman’s spiel or prayers in church.

    You memorized the propaganda long ago and can type it without even thinking. I’ve heard it all my life.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. Alden says:
    @Corvinus
    "You are awesome at not answering direct questions."

    I answered the questions posed. You are just not fond of the responses.

    "Feel free to give me one-word questions in response assuming you can control yourself and keep your response to these questions to one word."

    I will feel free to give whatever response I chose, considering the questions posed require other than simplistic answers. Just because your wife bosses you around does not mean you can take out your frustrations on this fine blog.

    "1. Do you believe that races or population groups exist? Is there such a thing as a people?"

    Races exist. Race is biological, but it is also a human construct. It took someone to "label" it. For example, the California spotted owl is an animal. The name of the creature is a human designation—strix occidentalis. That is, binomial nomenclature refers to a formal system, developed by people, to name things, in this case a species. The California owl was not a “California owl” until someone actually and specifically attached a name to it. Likewise, races were labeled in such a fashion.

    "2. Do you believe that genetics play a role – a role, Corny, not the whole enchilada – in IQ and other behavioral traits?"

    As I stated before, genetics and environmental factors play a role in behavioral traits. It's just that there is argument as to which is more influential AND whether certain races undeniably possess particular traits generally due to those factors, like high IQ or high time preferences.

    "3. Do you believe that genes are heritable?"

    Of course traits are capable of being inherited or of passing by inheritance. Again, there has been significant controversy in the scientific community about the heritability of specific characteristics.

    "4. Do you believe that the genes responsible for IQ and other behavioral traits are equally distributed across racial groups – assuming, of course, that you believe that there are races?"

    There are racial and ethnic disparities say, for example, in health status that are genetically based.

    "5. Do you believe that genetic differences among the races leads to different AVERAGE capabilities. For example, Tibetans ON AVERAGE tend to have higher lung capacity compared to the Chinese due to where they live."

    It would appear environmental and cultural attributes, as well as genetic factors, are involved in long-term adaptation to high altitude.

    6. Do you believe any race is “superior” in the eyes of God?

    The human race is what most matters.

    Actually, it’s not The California Spotted Owl. They were always called spotted owls and they live all over the country.

    It was just a dispute between a Goldman Sachs subsidiary clear cutting lumber company and environmentalists wishing to preserve the redwood forests in California that made the spotted owl famous.

    You are as ignorant about owls as you are about crime and who commits most of it

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. Alden says:
    @anarchyst
    ...it will NEVER be enough for blacks...both special "civil-rights (for some)" laws and "affirmative action", contract set-asides, scholarships for blacks only, and all other preferences based solely on race will still be around a hundred years from now. By the politicians allowing this sorry excuse for a race, this dysfunctional minority to dictate to us whites, destroying OUR history, they are prodding a "sleeping giant". PUSHBACK IS COMING. The racial hatred that blacks have for us whites is self-destructive and will do them no good. Whatever happened to "equality of opportunity?? It has been replaced with "equality of results" (quotas) which NEVER works.

    One can but hope that pushback is coming. I’ve been looking for a counter revolution for decades. It’s nice to think about, but I doubt it will ever happen.

    The core of the problem is the unelected judiciary at every level. Getting the judiciary under control of the elected executive branch is the only way Whites can save ourselves from extermination

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. Alden says:
    @Wally
    But don't ya know:

    "White folks was in the caves while we [blacks] was building empires … We built pyramids before Donald Trump ever knew what architecture was … we taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it."
    -- Al Sharpton

    Sharpton got that from a book of lies and falsehood propaganda titled “ Black Athena”. It was written by a Jew professor named Bernal at Ivy League Cornell. Every word was a lie and easily refuted

    But it became a best seller and every college prof in the land believes every word

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. Alden says:
    @wayfarer
    "Illegal Immigration Hurts Black Men Most"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eru5lJr35yQ

    "Immigrants Steal African-Americans' 14th Amendment 'Birthright' "
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8d9qBXrEYTc

    It’s true that the anchor babies stole the equal rights of Americans.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    I beg to differ...it was those of "the greatest generation" who foisted the misguided and deadly "civil-rights" laws, "affirmative action" laws and third-world immigration invitation laws on us. This "greatest generation" also used federal troops and the threat of federal prosecution to enforce civil-rights laws on white Americans...
    Regards,
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. anarchyst says:
    @Alden
    It’s true that the anchor babies stole the equal rights of Americans.

    I beg to differ…it was those of “the greatest generation” who foisted the misguided and deadly “civil-rights” laws, “affirmative action” laws and third-world immigration invitation laws on us. This “greatest generation” also used federal troops and the threat of federal prosecution to enforce civil-rights laws on white Americans…
    Regards,

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
A simple remedy for income stagnation