The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
Towards a Sensible Immigration Policy
National culture and identity must be respected
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Refugees

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I am intrigued by one aspect of both the Donald Trump campaign and the Brexit vote, namely the nearly fanatical vilification of the suggestion that a nation might actually seek to exercise some kind of control over immigration in order to maintain its cultural and religious identity. Both Trump supporters and Brexit voters have been dismissed by the establishment media as troglodytes, poorly educated ageing “white people” whose complete irrelevancy will be demonstrated when they all die off, taking their bigotry along with them. And may it come soon, according to the people who pontificate over such issues inside the Beltway and in the media.

Trump has even been attacked as “racist” for his wanting to deport illegal immigrants, something that is eminently sensible from a rule-of-law, national security and cultural identity point of view though practically problematic as there might be as many as 20 million of them in the U.S. If one does not believe that the schools and health care facilities in working class towns all over the United States have been negatively impacted by the wave of new and illegal arrivals one is either not paying attention or is willfully looking the other way.

I perhaps not surprisingly see the issue somewhat differently than the open borders or globalist crowd. We still live in a world of nation states, many of which have been around for a long time. Most have a dominant identity or unifying narrative which might well be ethnic, religious or even, as in the United States, cultural or institutional, which has sometimes been described as “civic nationalism.” In a country like the U.S. or Britain, where a form of democracy occasionally prevails, it would seem to me that the voters have a perfect right to demand that their government limit immigration both in numbers and by source in order to maintain the dominant culture. Edmund Burke once observed that “Society is indeed a contract … it becomes a participant not only between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born.” That means that a nation is both a compact among the living and a legacy issue for those who are to come. Being able to control one’s borders to include who can and cannot enter is an integral part of what national sovereignty and identity are all about.

Indeed, immigration into most countries is restricted in various ways and many countries do not permit anyone to become a citizen or legal resident under any circumstances. No one in the U.S. media is complaining about Saudi Arabia or Israel’s strict immigration policies, but the nations that are under fire for not being accessible enough to new waves of essentially third world immigration are those countries that already have fairly open doors, to include Western Europe and the United States. In deciding whom to let in by plebiscite, race or religion might certainly be a determinant in part in the mind of some of the voters who favor such restriction but it is my impression that “racism” is being exploited by those so-called “Social Justice Warriors” (SJWs) who wish to advance their globalist agenda by depicting any process for admitting new citizens selectively to maintain the dominant culture as morally unacceptable.

The advocates for more free immigration are really talking about inviting the third world, admitting large numbers of people who do not speak the local language, have the same religion or have the same social values as the established population. There is more than a touch of smugness and moral superiority in those who promote turning advanced and normally tolerant Western nations where the rule of law generally prevails into something more like Guatemala or Nigeria. That stems from the misguided notion that diversity and multiculturalism are wonderful things because all cultures are equally valid. They are not necessarily so. In Sudan the local culture supports clitoridectomy and many Pakistanis believe in honor killing.

The U.S. once had rational immigration policies that favored nationalities that already had large constituencies in place in the country. The intention was to maintain some measure of demographic stability, and it was indeed heavily weighted towards Europe. But that all changed in 1965 when Senator Ted Kennedy and colleagues decided that U.S. immigration had to be opened to the world, to include lotteries to assign visas at random. The new immigrants were inevitably followed by their extended families. Additional legislation followed in 1986 and 1990. By 1990 only 16% of new legal immigrants came from Europe. This third world bias in legal immigration coupled with the millions of illegals has already brought about a major demographic shift in the United States.

But immigration by lottery and “without documents” has proven to be a risky proposition for national identity and stability as there is considerable evidence that immigrants who are far outside the prevailing norms of the country they move to will fail to assimilate. This process has been exacerbated by the entry of tens of thousands of refugees from America’s wars, what Steve Sailer calls “invade the world-invite the world,” new citizens who surely bring with them deep seated grievances about what the U.S. refers to as foreign policy. Pat Buchanan once addressed the immigration issue in his characteristic salty fashion by saying in 1991“If we had to take a million immigrants in, say Zulus, next year, or Englishmen, and put them up in Virginia, what group would be easier to assimilate and would cause less problems for the people of Virginia?” If one replaces Zulus with Laplanders the comment becomes similarly valid without any racial overtones, but that would be a disappointment for the perpetually aggrieved SJW crowd which can only focus on the fact that Zulus are black and most Englishmen are white.

The entire issue of immigration, legal or otherwise is awash with liberal doublespeak. President Barack Obama has characteristically been on both sides of the illegal-“undocumented” issue, apparently testing the political winds and asking “What’s in it for me?” before taking any action. He first said he could not legally change the enforcement of immigration law by Executive Order and then proceeded to do just that. He has directed his Attorney General and Director of Homeland Security to slow down on deportations, with the numbers of those repatriated per Border Control Agent declining sharply and more reliance being placed on catch-and-release which is essentially get out of jail free for those who have chosen to enter illegally.

Obama repeatedly asserts in his characteristic pious tone that the White House wants to help illegals “get right with the law” but fails to support the obvious way to do so, i.e. by returning home and applying for a visa. And his Executive Order (which has just been overturned by the Supreme Court) has granted illegals access to all government benefits. These “undocumented immigrants” are not making us “stronger” as a nation in spite of repeated assertions by the White House. They bring few skills with them and the educational achievement levels for both Hispanic legals and illegals are very low, creating something like a permanent underclass.

But the average American, who foots the bill for the federal government induced dysfunction, apparent cannot have any say in the matter of who enters the country and how because it might be “racist” or “culturally insensitive” to do so. That point of view is absurd. I haven’t heard anyone suggesting that Washington should deport residents who arrived here legally based on race or religion and no one is denying any citizen his or her fundamental liberties. But no resident of a foreign country has a right to come and live in the United States just because he or she might want to. No country anywhere is required to take in immigrants and America is not a smorgasbord where one buys a chit and sits down to dine. Indeed, there have been calls for a moratorium on all immigration into the United States as the current situation appears to many to be both out of control and driven by partisan political considerations. Becoming an American citizen is a privilege that should be based on the ability to contribute something and the willingness to abide by both the law and local customs. The United States, insofar as it is the property of anyone, rightly belongs to the citizens who already live here and they have a right to set the rules. If someone doesn’t like that they are free to go somewhere else.

 
• Category: Foreign Policy, Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Brexit, Immigration 
Hide 111 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Except for Israel, right?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Yep, "Jews Only" for 'Israel'.

    also see:
    Jews in US admit "Israel First"
    http://mondoweiss.net/2016/07/bluntly-firsters-politics/

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /pgiraldi/towards-a-sensible-immigration-policy/#comment-1478879
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. chris says:

    just ask native Americans about the benefits of multiculturalism

    Read More
    • Replies: @Chris Mallory
    Do you mean the descendants of the British Protestants who founded the United States (the only people who should be called native Americans)? Or the tribes of Asian immigrants who are better called by their tribal names?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Wally says: • Website
    @Anonymous
    Except for Israel, right?

    Yep, “Jews Only” for ‘Israel’.

    also see:
    Jews in US admit “Israel First”

    http://mondoweiss.net/2016/07/bluntly-firsters-politics/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    Mondoweiss is a closet "Israel First". It allows criticism of Israel but not the Jews even Israeli Jews. Just read website's commenting policy.

    As Gilad Atzmon says, "Palestine Solidarity movement is full of such rats.

    I was not surprised when Rabbi Michael Lerner called Gilad Atzmon, ASSHOLE for exposing him a 'rat' over delivering a speech at boxer Muhammad Ali's funeral.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/06/27/rabbi-lerner-calls-gilad-atzmon-asshole/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Mr. Obama follows orders by announcing that it is a “moral imperative” to legalize immigrants who arrived here illegally. They are not really immigrants but trespassers. Try jumping over a wall in a wealthy San Francisco subdivision or the Vatican and pitch a tent to see what compassion the resident “liberals” show you.

    Obama pretends this is not support for open borders by setting a specific date, and has stated that who arrived before 2012 should be granted visas to remain forever. But there is no visa stamp for those who arrive illegally, so all can simply claim they were here before that date. But I must ask why it is a moral imperative to grant visas to those who knowingly broke out laws and cut in line ahead of those waiting abroad for their legal visas? I must also ask why it is not a moral imperative to grant visas to those who arrived in 2012, or 2013, or yesterday?

    Nothing has caused more harm to poor American blacks, latinos, and whites that permitting mass illegal immigration. Illegals and legals drive up rents, drive down wages, and crowd hospitals and schools. It mostly benefits wealthy Americans. Bernie Sanders spoke about these facts, until a year ago, when he was undermined by rich “liberals” who took advantage of his weaknesses for pleasing liberals. This is why he lost, and why Jeb and other corporate spokesmen running for President lacked popular support.

    Read More
    • Agree: CanSpeccy
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Kiza says:

    Dear Phil

    Both Trump supporters and Brexit voters have been dismissed by the establishment media as troglodytes, poorly educated ageing “white people” whose complete irrelevancy will be demonstrated when they all die off, taking their bigotry along with them. And may it come soon

    I am just wondering how long it may take for the MSM and Establishment followers to help the two groups you mention (it could even be one and the same) get there, that is die. The US may not be too far from another civil war. I hope not.

    This is where you put your finger on the crux of the matter:

    Indeed, immigration into most countries is restricted in various ways and many countries do not permit anyone to become a citizen or legal resident under any circumstances. No one in the U.S. media is complaining about Saudi Arabia or Israel’s strict immigration policies, but the nations that are under fire for not being accessible enough to new waves of essentially third world immigration are those countries that already have fairly open doors, to include Western Europe and the United States.

    The only thing that you could have mentioned is that illegal immigration is all about profit, it is the good old private profit at public loss. The connected get the profit, the whole society loses, especially the middle class. But this is always wrapped up in some beautiful images of doing good (pulling emotional strings). This is identical to the US military interventions, that is attacks and destruction of countries wrapped up in R2P, saving some victims and so on.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Harry Heller
    Please remember: Paul RINO's heart just bleeds for more "productive, hardworking" immigrants - I guess not the 60%+ who receive some form of Gov welfare ... TWENTY years and more after their naturalizations??!!?

    IMMIGRATION = INVASION

    That's all there is to it. Migratory imperialism. Demographic warfare. Totalitarian population replacement.

    Not only can no authentic "conservative" ever support mass immigration invasions, neither can any genuine "libertarian". All mass immigration is is the treasonous handing over of citizenship (ie, in another STATE, something libertarians are supposed to oppose) to unassimilable aliens: aka INVADERS. What is "libertarian" about what Blood Traitor Merkel did to Germany and the EU -forcing the German and other European people to accept mass waves of migratory, Islamic jihadist-settler-colonialist-rapists into their civilized societies?

    It's time for EVERYONE (that includes YOU, Mr. Unz!) to recognize that the non-Nazi white nationalists were ALWAYS correct. "Diversity" is a disaster for the white peoples of the globe, and mass immigration is a form of elite class war against the historic nation.

    Trump is far too moderate.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. edNels [AKA "geoshmoe"] says:

    Whoever it was that wrote of the Holocaust times that the camp inmates had a new mental/social disease that they labeled something like concentration camp syndrome, or something. The new part of this malady was that people were hopeless and were from diverse places and couldn’t come together or build any bonds that might help to gain a footing to fight back, but more were totally undermined in everyway psychologically etc. so that made them utterly passive and hopeless.

    The new Nazi Global state well on its way to a new Euro/Reich, dispenses with the rousing marching music, and night rallies with torches, and so on, but this time cooly makes for a pacification of all resistant populations by annihilation of all their cultural identity, making a polyglot mess of mixed up refugees, so nobody will be comfortable anymore, you won’t be at home in whatever city or country, because you must share space with swarming hordes of rootless folks.

    In the end everybody gets driven into Fema camps, where they can pray together, in different ways.

    Only the ones that are Exceptional, get to be the new lords and masters of the Universe, and then they won’t have to share anything.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    Always try to remember, in today's West, "Every lie is a truth, and every truth is "conspiracy theory".

    Take for example, who much fame and money Elie Wiesel received by fabricating Holocaust stories.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/07/03/elie-wiesel-worlds-greatest-holohoaxer-dies-at-87/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. I can’t argue with anything the author has written here. All good points.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. Realist says:

    “Towards a Sensible Immigration Policy”

    The only sensible immigration policy is none.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. Rehmat says:

    Dr. Giraldi, with due respect, let me state historical facts to refute some of myths you have mentioned in the article.

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.

    2. The first wave of non-White immigrants were brought-in to the US, Britain, France, Dutch, etc. by the colonists from Africa, Asia, and Middle East – not on humanitarian basis, but as a cheap labor.

    3. Calling United States a “sort of democracy” is the biggest example of ignorance. It’s in fact a “Dollarcracy”.

    4. The “clitoridectomy” and “honor killing” is universal and were practiced in the world even before the arrival of Islam 1400 years ago or the establishment of Pakistan in 1947.

    For example, in Eritrea 89% of Catholics and 85% of Protestants practice female genital mutilation (FGM,) whereas in Niger (94% Muslim) 80% (more according to some surveys) of the people do NOT practice FGM.

    Talking about the called “honor killing” or most probably “domestic violence”. Over 30% of women killed in the United States are killed by their husbands or boyfriends. In Italy the figure is 75% are killed by their current of former husbands or boyfriends. In comparison, in Muslim Jordan 25% of women who are killed are killed by male members of their families. This is the highest rate of the crime in Arab and Muslim countries, even though it is lower than the rate of murder of women in the United States by their husbands or boyfriends.

    You see Mr. Giraldi, it’s considered a “freedom of speech” to practice “Doublegoodthinking”.

    http://newdemocracyworld.org/culture/muslims5.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    Rehmat, how many Muslims would there be today without the Muslim conquests? By your logic, Islam is completely invalid.

    I don't really care what Muslims believe, or how they behave, as long as they believe and do in their homelands. If only I could turn over the Western leaders who have destroyed the ME for Qadaffi treatment, I would gladly do so. Would you be willing to turn over Muslims who are guilty of harming innocent non-Muslims?
    , @Anonymous
    Antiwhites like you will say literally anything to justify white genocide.

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.
     
    Here's an analogy for you:

    ProudFoot lives in a dilapidated shed in the wilderness. I come over uninvited, we have a tussle, I win. Over the next 200 years, I turn that shed into a mansion, and the forest into a prosperous town.

    This is a moral dilemma. ProudFoot deserves some consideration for being on the land and me coming uninvited, as do I for later building, investing in, and defending it.

    This a property dispute between me and ProudFoot. I can grant him a private part of the mansion and special privileges in the town, for example. I can even decide to vacate the land entirely, and return ProudFoot his land and his previous state of desolation. There are plenty of options here.

    But either way, and pay close attention now: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.

    Inviting people like you makes ProudFoot's problem worse! You're just another burglar according to your position.

    2. The first wave of non-White immigrants were brought-in to the US, Britain, France, Dutch, etc. by the colonists from Africa, Asia, and Middle East – not on humanitarian basis, but as a cheap labor.
     
    OK, then the Europeans can work out an agreement with the the descendants of those cheap labour regarding privileges and status in the US. Deal.

    Again, this leads to the same conclusion: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.

    How much time do you devote to fretting about the colonialism of say, North Africa?

    How much time do you devote to demanding open borders in the lands of your colonizing kin, like Turkey?

    Or apologizing for the widespread colonialism and rampant slavery done by your kin of say, the Balkans?

    Why do you spend your time demanding "Diversity" in ALL and ONLY white populations?
    , @Durruti
    Rehmat,

    Nice response to Giraldi.

    "I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority." Need more be said?

    Your description of American political culture is more accurate than those who are attempting to support the 2016 Electoral Circus, by handicapping for one of the Twin Political Gangs, by supporting one of the puppet candidates, as Giraldi does here:

    "Both Trump supporters and Brexit voters have been dismissed by the establishment media as troglodytes, poorly educated ageing “white people” whose complete irrelevancy will be demonstrated when they all die off, taking their bigotry along with them."

    Therefore Casino Trump must not be dismissed, but is the superior of the official candidates, (as Giraldi, cleverly pimps for Casino Owner Trump).

    A Democratic Republic knows no Racial, Cultural, or Religious distinctions. As ML King said, We are all members of one Race, the Human race.

    For the Restoration of our Republic!
    , @Wally
    So then, American Indians were xenophobic / racist for resisting European migrants.
    , @Salger

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.
     
    http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/06/02/the-non-genocide-of-northern-native-americans/

    http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/16/the-solutrean-hypothesis/

    https://board.freedomainradio.com/topic/47655-youtube-the-truth-about-the-native-american-genocide/

    You might as well demand Saudi Arabia have Open Borders for the conquest sprees carried out by Muslims. And throw in Japan for that matter. And Mongolia.

    4.

    Islam is feminist friendly!
     
    http://catalogingthedeclineofthewest.tumblr.com/tagged/islam-and-women
    , @Brad Smith
    1) Disease killed most of the Native Americans not the White Man. The diseases raced ahead of the White Men so that in most places all they found were empty lands. Furthermore, the various American Indians had no problem at all killing and stealing land from each other. So who do you give it back to? The evil White Man did not Genocide the Natives that is one huge myth. In fact it's very likely that there are more American Indians in America today than when this nation was founded. Yes there were some wars but nobody made an attempt to wipe out all the American Indians that is simply not true.

    2) Who cares how the Evil White Dudes first got here? We came here in various ways and built a great nation with a culture that is envied around the world. It's not something to be ashamed of and the ungrateful assclowns who don't like the nation and culture we built, can go find someplace else to live if they don't like it. You don't need to turn the US into Mexico when there is already a Mexico. If you like that culture go and live their, the same is true for any other place on Earth.

    3) non-sequitur

    4) Is a Straw-man because he never suggested that we want them coming here either.

    Your last point is simply ridiculous. All cultures have problems with violence but not all cultures have a code where murder is acceptable. If you want to live in a place where it is acceptable go live there because we don't want you.

    To put it very bluntly, if you don't want to be an American who shares our common values then you don't belong here. It literally took thousands of years to create Western Culture and we are not going to toss it away for ungrateful people who think so very little of us.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. Rehmat says:
    @edNels


    Whoever it was that wrote of the Holocaust times that the camp inmates had a new mental/social disease that they labeled something like concentration camp syndrome, or something. The new part of this malady was that people were hopeless and were from diverse places and couldn't come together or build any bonds that might help to gain a footing to fight back, but more were totally undermined in everyway psychologically etc. so that made them utterly passive and hopeless.

    The new Nazi Global state well on its way to a new Euro/Reich, dispenses with the rousing marching music, and night rallies with torches, and so on, but this time cooly makes for a pacification of all resistant populations by annihilation of all their cultural identity, making a polyglot mess of mixed up refugees, so nobody will be comfortable anymore, you won't be at home in whatever city or country, because you must share space with swarming hordes of rootless folks.

    In the end everybody gets driven into Fema camps, where they can pray together, in different ways.

    Only the ones that are Exceptional, get to be the new lords and masters of the Universe, and then they won't have to share anything.

    Always try to remember, in today’s West, “Every lie is a truth, and every truth is “conspiracy theory”.

    Take for example, who much fame and money Elie Wiesel received by fabricating Holocaust stories.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/07/03/elie-wiesel-worlds-greatest-holohoaxer-dies-at-87/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Rolando says:

    Towards a Sensible Immigration Policy

    Stop ALL immigration.

    Immigration into the US is the Democrat Party’s Greatest Voter Drive in World History.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    The whole point of post-1965 US Immigration Policy is to deprive The Historic Native Born White American Working Class of the very great benefit of a very severe labor scarcity….which is a very high real wage.

    Post-1965 US Immigration is under the control of Greedy Cheating Oligarchs and nonwhite foreign nationals such as the India Policy Group which owns the US Congress. And as a consequence, Greedy Cheating White Oligarchs have been stealing the wealth of The Native Born White American Working Class for over 40 years….and, the Asian Fifth Column has been able to vote for the very rapid race-replacement of The Historic Native Born White American Working Class every 4 years at POTUS time.

    The combination of Greedy Cheating White MEGA-CEO Power and South Asian Race Power is on full-display in the area surrounding Gruman Corp where Donald Trump had his big rally two months ago in the old LEM building. In the summer of 1969, The US put two Alpha Native Born White American Males on the Moon. These two Alpha Native Born White American Males descended down from the Gruman Corp LEM which was designed and built by Native Born White American Male Engineer’s and Technicians…all of them WW2…Korea War…and Vietnam War Vets. A few years after the 1969 Moon landing, Greedy Cheating White Male Gruman Corp Execs began race-replacing it’s Native Born White American Male Engineering and Technian Workforce with legal immigrants from China….India….and Pakistan. Through family reunification legal immigration….the area surrounding Gruman Corp has been annexed by India. But the Gruman Corp Execs and their Corporate Lawyers did get their multi-million dollar homes in Llyod Neck(Fiddlers Green Area). This is the area of Billy Joel’s 1978 hit “Eddy and Brenda”…Happy Days malt-shop Lilly-White.

    I am for 0 nonwhite legal immigrants forever….this is what should have happened in 1965 when the 1965 Immigration Reform Act was passed. The 1965 Immigration Reform Act should be called the “1965 Native Born White American Working Class Extermination Act!!!!”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    I just want to follow up the following:A very severe labor scarcity must never never be used as an excuse to race-replace The Historic Native Born White American Working Class. The Greedy Cheating White Male MEGA-CEOs go hysterical over severe labor scarcities to justify race-replacing The Historic Native Born White American Working Class in places such as the area surrounding Gruman Corp where Trump held his Rally in the old LEM building. two months ago.


    The horrible immigration moratorium proposal of vdare.com concedes the labor scarcity issue to the race-replacement enthusiasts such as the Kenyan Foreigner who now threatens Conservative Orthodox Christian Russia with thermonuclear extermination on a daily basis.


    The homosexual War Criminal Kenyan Foreigner would never have had a snowballs chance in hell of ever being elected POTUS in 2008+2012 if the 1965 Immigration Reform Act had not been passed, and if there had been a National Origins Immigration Policy that excluded all nonwhites. His Nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc never would have existed in the US and his Muslim Kenyan Father would never have been allowed into the US to knock up the 17 year old weirdo Anne Dunham.
    , @Tommy
    America was never meant to be a white-only country. If so, America would never have brought in negro slaves.

    Asians are more economically successful than whites. America should always let in higher-skilled immigrants, who in this case, happen to be Asian.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Well said, and stating the obvious. I just can’t figure out just who the driving force behind all this could be. It’s a damn mystery.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    I smell gefilte fish.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @War for Blair Mountain
    The whole point of post-1965 US Immigration Policy is to deprive The Historic Native Born White American Working Class of the very great benefit of a very severe labor scarcity....which is a very high real wage.


    Post-1965 US Immigration is under the control of Greedy Cheating Oligarchs and nonwhite foreign nationals such as the India Policy Group which owns the US Congress. And as a consequence, Greedy Cheating White Oligarchs have been stealing the wealth of The Native Born White American Working Class for over 40 years....and, the Asian Fifth Column has been able to vote for the very rapid race-replacement of The Historic Native Born White American Working Class every 4 years at POTUS time.

    The combination of Greedy Cheating White MEGA-CEO Power and South Asian Race Power is on full-display in the area surrounding Gruman Corp where Donald Trump had his big rally two months ago in the old LEM building. In the summer of 1969, The US put two Alpha Native Born White American Males on the Moon. These two Alpha Native Born White American Males descended down from the Gruman Corp LEM which was designed and built by Native Born White American Male Engineer's and Technicians...all of them WW2...Korea War...and Vietnam War Vets. A few years after the 1969 Moon landing, Greedy Cheating White Male Gruman Corp Execs began race-replacing it's Native Born White American Male Engineering and Technian Workforce with legal immigrants from China....India....and Pakistan. Through family reunification legal immigration....the area surrounding Gruman Corp has been annexed by India. But the Gruman Corp Execs and their Corporate Lawyers did get their multi-million dollar homes in Llyod Neck(Fiddlers Green Area). This is the area of Billy Joel's 1978 hit "Eddy and Brenda"...Happy Days malt-shop Lilly-White.

    I am for 0 nonwhite legal immigrants forever....this is what should have happened in 1965 when the 1965 Immigration Reform Act was passed. The 1965 Immigration Reform Act should be called the "1965 Native Born White American Working Class Extermination Act!!!!".

    I just want to follow up the following:A very severe labor scarcity must never never be used as an excuse to race-replace The Historic Native Born White American Working Class. The Greedy Cheating White Male MEGA-CEOs go hysterical over severe labor scarcities to justify race-replacing The Historic Native Born White American Working Class in places such as the area surrounding Gruman Corp where Trump held his Rally in the old LEM building. two months ago.

    The horrible immigration moratorium proposal of vdare.com concedes the labor scarcity issue to the race-replacement enthusiasts such as the Kenyan Foreigner who now threatens Conservative Orthodox Christian Russia with thermonuclear extermination on a daily basis.

    The homosexual War Criminal Kenyan Foreigner would never have had a snowballs chance in hell of ever being elected POTUS in 2008+2012 if the 1965 Immigration Reform Act had not been passed, and if there had been a National Origins Immigration Policy that excluded all nonwhites. His Nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc never would have existed in the US and his Muslim Kenyan Father would never have been allowed into the US to knock up the 17 year old weirdo Anne Dunham.

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH
    You are right. Japan is aging and experiencing a labor shortage in some industries but since they are both sane and racially conscious (unlike most feckless white Americans and their equally feckless shabbos goy politicians) they steadfastly refuse to throw open their borders to the third world. Instead they are opting for increased automation.

    The Japanese are under no illusion that Japan is a proposition nation, an experiment and that anybody can become Japanese.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Since Americans have never had a chance to directly vote on immigration, and our voices are purposely ignored, I’d have no problem with having the 1965 act, and later amnesties, deemed illegal, and stripping every single immigrant and their families of citizenship. Why not? It’s the fair thing to do, if you care about Americans, and it’s no less radical that what’s been done over the last fifty years.

    The charge of racism is meaningless when it’s not being used as a smear, or a tool of harm. I have absolutely no problem admitting that I prefer to be around whites. Why not admit as much? The immigrants themselves seem to flock to nations that were created and settled mainly by white Europeans.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. @chris
    just ask native Americans about the benefits of multiculturalism

    Do you mean the descendants of the British Protestants who founded the United States (the only people who should be called native Americans)? Or the tribes of Asian immigrants who are better called by their tribal names?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    If they were British Protestants who founded something called the United States, shouldn't they be called British Protestants or United Statesians or British Protestant United Statesians, etc.?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    Policies are not about being sensible.

    They are about POWER, and it just so happens that the ‘sensible’ is an obstacle to GLOB supremacism.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  18. dahoit says:
    @ISmellBagels
    Well said, and stating the obvious. I just can't figure out just who the driving force behind all this could be. It's a damn mystery.

    I smell gefilte fish.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. kiismerh says:

    I am for multiculturalism and that is why I dont want immigration, because with that at the end there will only be brown people. Google french football team …

    Read More
    • Replies: @kiismerh
    And I should add... brown and stupid.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. That means that a nation is both a compact among the living and a legacy issue for those who are to come. Being able to control one’s borders to include who can and cannot enter is an integral part of what national sovereignty and identity are all about.

    I am quoting this in little too many comments maybe, but it’s too perfect a picture not to:

    “If we broke up the big banks tomorrow,” Mrs. Clinton asked the audience of black, white and Hispanic union members, “would that end racism? Would that end sexism? Would that end discrimination against the L.G.B.T. community?,” she said, using an abbreviation for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender. “Would that make people feel more welcoming to immigrants overnight?”

    At each question, the crowd called back with a resounding no.

    I don’t think anybody’s unaware of what you say.
    Some want that identity to change; some want changes as for not only identity but also national sovereignty (they are already internationally sovereign: national sovereignty must look like a mere hindrance to these kings). Some, whom we name “white people” want their identity to disappear, that is, like the above, a change as regards identity.

    Those so-called “Social Justice Warriors” (SJWs) who wish to advance their globalist agenda by depicting any process for admitting new citizens selectively to maintain the dominant culture as morally unacceptable.

    SJWs are “engined” by technocratic finance, that’s what really hold all the power.
    They are made to believe there’s common goals, and their energy is exploited to the latter’s use.
    Not all of them are unaware of this. But they’d rather be pawn and isntruments of other powers and get the destruction of what they want destroyed (Western civilization, democracy) than be independent and fight what they claim be their prime enemy, capitalism, and in truth is now their (upper in hierarchy) ally.

    We shouldn’t mistake actors for factors.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  21. kiismerh says:
    @kiismerh
    I am for multiculturalism and that is why I dont want immigration, because with that at the end there will only be brown people. Google french football team ...

    And I should add… brown and stupid.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. The advocates for more free immigration are really talking about inviting the third world, admitting large numbers of people who do not speak the local language, have the same religion or have the same social values as the established population. There is more than a touch of smugness and moral superiority in those who promote turning advanced and normally tolerant Western nations where the rule of law generally prevails into something more like Guatemala or Nigeria. That stems from the misguided notion that diversity and multiculturalism are wonderful things because all cultures are equally valid. They are not necessarily so. In Sudan the local culture supports clitoridectomy and many Pakistanis believe in honor killing.

    The U.S. once had rational immigration policies that favored nationalities that already had large constituencies in place in the country.

    We never get to the bottom of this if we don’t detect the deep psychological and philosophical causes of it. The subterranean voice of our time: that everything is nothing. Nihilism.
    It began with the Nietzsches and Leopardis and Schopenhauers 2 century ago; it has reached, as unconscious feeling rather than rationalized thought, wide portions of populations, especially, as is obvious, the high-IQ ones.

    Masochism and the will for self-obliteration are the result: the normal response to pain is to evade pain; the normal response to existential pain is to evade existence.
    We see statistics for suicide among different ethnic groups. We also know that very few people in the lower income classes commit suicide for any reason but their economic struggle. On the other hand, more kill themselves in the middle and high income classes, and none of them due to economic problems.

    Add to this that complete liberty inflicts grave existential pain too; there is an enormous — and unconscious, as it needs be — will to be relieved from liberty.
    And here it is that society based on denying freedom become appealing, are admired.

    There is, as there must be, a lot of inconsistency in the words and openly expressed thoughts: that’s a result of the conscious-subconscious interplay. Looking at the bottom of it, all is perfectly consistent.

    Leopardi’s Zibaldone pictured the future of Western white civilization 2 centuries beforehand (not by chance it’s still a poorly understood book…)
    ————–
    The contempted “third-worlders” are nothing but the executors of a will of the West.

    The adjective “rational” belongs not in the topic. This is about a will that lies deep: under the surface of rationality.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. @Rehmat
    Dr. Giraldi, with due respect, let me state historical facts to refute some of myths you have mentioned in the article.

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.

    2. The first wave of non-White immigrants were brought-in to the US, Britain, France, Dutch, etc. by the colonists from Africa, Asia, and Middle East - not on humanitarian basis, but as a cheap labor.

    3. Calling United States a "sort of democracy" is the biggest example of ignorance. It's in fact a "Dollarcracy".

    4. The "clitoridectomy" and "honor killing" is universal and were practiced in the world even before the arrival of Islam 1400 years ago or the establishment of Pakistan in 1947.

    For example, in Eritrea 89% of Catholics and 85% of Protestants practice female genital mutilation (FGM,) whereas in Niger (94% Muslim) 80% (more according to some surveys) of the people do NOT practice FGM.

    Talking about the called "honor killing" or most probably "domestic violence". Over 30% of women killed in the United States are killed by their husbands or boyfriends. In Italy the figure is 75% are killed by their current of former husbands or boyfriends. In comparison, in Muslim Jordan 25% of women who are killed are killed by male members of their families. This is the highest rate of the crime in Arab and Muslim countries, even though it is lower than the rate of murder of women in the United States by their husbands or boyfriends.

    You see Mr. Giraldi, it's considered a "freedom of speech" to practice "Doublegoodthinking".

    http://newdemocracyworld.org/culture/muslims5.html

    Rehmat, how many Muslims would there be today without the Muslim conquests? By your logic, Islam is completely invalid.

    I don’t really care what Muslims believe, or how they behave, as long as they believe and do in their homelands. If only I could turn over the Western leaders who have destroyed the ME for Qadaffi treatment, I would gladly do so. Would you be willing to turn over Muslims who are guilty of harming innocent non-Muslims?

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus

    I don’t really care what Muslims believe, or how they behave, as long as they believe and do in their homelands.
     
    With you 300%, OilcanFloyd; get those damn Muslim military bases out of their 800-odd locations throughout the Yoo-nited States! Don't these people respect borders and sovereignty, fer chrissakes! Buncha Mooslim retards.
    , @Rehmat
    OilcanFloyd, how many Jews there would be today without racism and hatred towards over five billion non-Jews. By your logic, Judaism is completely invalid - just ask British Jewish writer, peace activist and ex-blogger.

    a great majority of 3.7 billion Muslims and Christians don't care what Jews believe, but they do fear their evil nature, as long as they do it homelands from where they're expelled over 108 times. If I only can convince the western leaders who had killed hundreds of thousands of Jewish evil-doers, I gladly tell them to listen to American Jewish writer Steve Lendman very, very carefully, who says kill all those bastard Jews who killed 3,000 Christians and Muslims at WTC on September 11, 2001.

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/03/10/paul-eisen-judaism-is-not-religion-of-peace/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. An excellent, well-reasoned article, Phil, as usual. One small correction. You say that the hideous practice of clitoridectomy is supported by the local culture in Sudan. In fact, it is practiced quite widely in Arab and African countries. Typically, western feminists, in a permanent outrage at the crimes of the “patriarchy,” have yet to denounce this atrocity inflicted on millions of girls and women in the third world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  25. Phil wrote:

    “The U.S. once had rational immigration policies that favored nationalities that already had large constituencies in place in the country. The intention was to maintain some measure of demographic stability, and it was indeed heavily weighted towards Europe. But that all changed in 1965 when Senator Ted Kennedy and colleagues decided that U.S. immigration had to be opened to the world, “

    Nation of Nations: A Great American Immigration Story, by Tom Gjelten

    “George Reedy said it was “just that he thought something ought to be done, and he did it. . . .There’s not much to say about it.” Moreover, it apparently took some time for him to get up to speed on the subject.
    Irving Bernstein, another historian of the Johnson presidency, said the new president was “uninformed” about immigration reform when he took office and had to be educated on the issue by Myer Feldman, the Kennedy aide who ghostwrote “A Nation of Immigrants.”

    Feldman told one interviewer that Johnson initially worried that immigration might be too hot an issue for him to take on.

    But Feldman, Abba Schwartz, and other former Kennedy advisers soon convinced Johnson that if he were really going to produce a civil rights law that eliminated “every trace of discrimination and oppression that is based upon race or color,” as he had promised to do shorty after taking over the presidency, he would also have to commit to the elimination of the national origin bias in immigration law.

    In his first State of the Union speech [08 Jan 1964], delivered just six weeks after taking office, Johnson envisioned a world “in which all men, goods, and ideas can freely move across every border and every boundary,” and he called for the elimination of visa quotas based on national origin.

    (((keep in mind JFK was assassinated by a lone gunman — he probably had mental issues– and LBJ was neither repaying debts nor servicing Matilda Krim on June 8, 1967.))

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  26. @OilcanFloyd
    Rehmat, how many Muslims would there be today without the Muslim conquests? By your logic, Islam is completely invalid.

    I don't really care what Muslims believe, or how they behave, as long as they believe and do in their homelands. If only I could turn over the Western leaders who have destroyed the ME for Qadaffi treatment, I would gladly do so. Would you be willing to turn over Muslims who are guilty of harming innocent non-Muslims?

    I don’t really care what Muslims believe, or how they behave, as long as they believe and do in their homelands.

    With you 300%, OilcanFloyd; get those damn Muslim military bases out of their 800-odd locations throughout the Yoo-nited States! Don’t these people respect borders and sovereignty, fer chrissakes! Buncha Mooslim retards.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik



    I don’t really care what Muslims believe, or how they behave, as long as they believe and do in their homelands.
     
    With you 300%, OilcanFloyd; get those damn Muslim military bases out of their 800-odd locations throughout the Yoo-nited States! Don’t these people respect borders and sovereignty, fer chrissakes! Buncha Mooslim retards.
     
    the one and only reason the Zio-boyz are able to foist these assorted wars and atrocities and outrages against the Islamic nations- using the Western peoples and militaries like the US and England and Germany- is because the people of these nations have no sense of themselves. They've been Zionised, and are now war fodder zombies in the service of Zion. Duh

    how many wars against Islam have nationalists like Pat Buchannan advocated, eh SC?

    or even David Duke for that matter.

    all the exact same people speaking out against the Islamic invasions of the West are the exact same people speaking out against the wars and military invasions of those same countries. Like myself for instance. Or even PG here. We don't like the strife and hatred and blood-shed and slaughter, whether the invasions are going out from the West into the Muslim world, or from the Muslim world into the West. We want peace and mutual respect. We don't want hatred and wars. We're not filled with an imperative to get back at anyone. We just want the world to act like sane people who are not killing and invading each other.

    Or, hadn't you noticed that?

    The most powerful and vociferous voices against the wars and the saber rattling against Iran and Russia are the exact same voices saying we don't want to hand over complete and absolute control of our nations to the Zionists, who're obviously using immigration to weaken our voices and rule with absolute power, and what then SC? Had you even considered that?

    No, obviously not.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. Thank you, Philip Giraldi, for helping break down the prohibition against the paradox of national governments claiming that nationalism is bad. If our government does not work for us, who do they work for? If the nation had known what Ted Kennedy was going to do with civil rights, there would have been more outcry. But it happened by stealth, and no one wanted to be called racist during the decades since while our borders were erased without our consent.

    The so-called social justice warriors have made a compelling case for a moratorium on all immigration. They have made it painfully obvious, if you accept their view, that not even slavery’s descendants have been assimilated, ever will be, or even should be. Reparations are next. Obama is bringing in new generations of people who will more likely join this Grievance Industry than ever assimilate. A national government that harms it own nation this way might be losing its ‘legitimacy’ (Hello, Obama, president of the world?).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  28. RudyM says:

    The “clitoridectomy” and “honor killing” is universal and were practiced in the world even before the arrival of Islam 1400 years ago or the establishment of Pakistan in 1947.

    Giraldi did not link clitoridectomy to Islam. And it is far from globally universal, to the best of my knowledge.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Epaminondas
    Try reading this...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. SC, I’m not sure how you get that I support having U.S. troops in Muslim nations, or that I view Muslims as a bunch of “Mooslim retards.” My wish would be to remove U.S. troops from the ME and to put the people who sent them there on trial, along with the idea and money men who pulled the strings. I support neither the invade nor the invite. Both are wrong.

    I just want to be an American in a country that I recognize, and governed by people like me, who have my best interests at heart, and who have no animosity towards me. Is that really too much to ask?

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    A few days ago a friend (an immigrant from Japan) asked me to explain "tongue in cheek."

    ---

    It seems to me part of the conversation on immigration that we in the USA must have would emphasize that borders have two sides, and that US government policy makers have respected neither side of its own borders; they have neither controlled who comes into the USA nor controlled themselves from aggressing outside their own borders.

    "Invade the world invite the world" is cute but perhaps does not frame the argument strongly enough. Phil made the case for the rights of the American people to have their government respect their voices and wishes to protect their national culture and sovereignty, and I applaud and endorse his argument.

    In my view, the American people have an equal right and responsibility to demand that their government stop invading other people's lands and undermining their governments, sovereignty and cultures. That's not just a nice thing to do, it's an obligation, one that is, in my view, even more important than the responsibility to insist that our government control migration into USA. It's more important because US acts of invading other countries and destabilizing other states amount to criminal acts of aggression.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    Diversity has almost always been the product of imperialism, military or demographic.

    Brazil is the future of ‘diverse’ Europe that is under Zionist elite imperialism and demographic invasion from the 3rd world. Europeans are the new Palestinians. What did Jewish immigration into Palestine lead to?

    Imperialism = Diversity = Dysfunction(esp with lots of blacks)

    http://www.cbc.ca/sports/olympics/rio2016/sailing/rio-sailing-pollution-1.3664380?cmp=rss

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. RudyM says:

    I’m still pretty ambivalent on this topic. I don’t believe in open borders but given American history, I can’t swallow the idea of making the US as white as possible. It seems like a slap in the face to the Native Americans whose land this was initially, to the descendants of African brought here as slaves, to those who descend from Hispanics who became US citizens through war (or, more truthfully, conquest), and to all who have legally come here as immigrants. Given that history, I cannot be comfortable with claims that the US is for white people–period.

    At the same time, I am honestly concerned where things are headed if whites become a minority, especially given some of the rhetoric of those who cheer on that supposed inevitability. It’s also true that, by and large, our institutions are western European, heavily indebted to England and Germany, and rooted in a Protestant heritage. I think it’s fair to want immigrants who are likely to share the political values our (admittedly, extremely imperfect) institutions are based upon.

    Read More
    • Agree: iffen
    • Replies: @Chris Mallory

    I can’t swallow the idea of making the US as white as possible.
     
    Yet for most of our history, we were as white as possible.
    , @Epaminondas
    Imagine the scenario of wandering tribes who enforce their "borders" by tribal warfare. Is that better than what the Europeans brought over? I don't think so.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Rehmat
    Dr. Giraldi, with due respect, let me state historical facts to refute some of myths you have mentioned in the article.

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.

    2. The first wave of non-White immigrants were brought-in to the US, Britain, France, Dutch, etc. by the colonists from Africa, Asia, and Middle East - not on humanitarian basis, but as a cheap labor.

    3. Calling United States a "sort of democracy" is the biggest example of ignorance. It's in fact a "Dollarcracy".

    4. The "clitoridectomy" and "honor killing" is universal and were practiced in the world even before the arrival of Islam 1400 years ago or the establishment of Pakistan in 1947.

    For example, in Eritrea 89% of Catholics and 85% of Protestants practice female genital mutilation (FGM,) whereas in Niger (94% Muslim) 80% (more according to some surveys) of the people do NOT practice FGM.

    Talking about the called "honor killing" or most probably "domestic violence". Over 30% of women killed in the United States are killed by their husbands or boyfriends. In Italy the figure is 75% are killed by their current of former husbands or boyfriends. In comparison, in Muslim Jordan 25% of women who are killed are killed by male members of their families. This is the highest rate of the crime in Arab and Muslim countries, even though it is lower than the rate of murder of women in the United States by their husbands or boyfriends.

    You see Mr. Giraldi, it's considered a "freedom of speech" to practice "Doublegoodthinking".

    http://newdemocracyworld.org/culture/muslims5.html

    Antiwhites like you will say literally anything to justify white genocide.

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.

    Here’s an analogy for you:

    ProudFoot lives in a dilapidated shed in the wilderness. I come over uninvited, we have a tussle, I win. Over the next 200 years, I turn that shed into a mansion, and the forest into a prosperous town.

    This is a moral dilemma. ProudFoot deserves some consideration for being on the land and me coming uninvited, as do I for later building, investing in, and defending it.

    This a property dispute between me and ProudFoot. I can grant him a private part of the mansion and special privileges in the town, for example. I can even decide to vacate the land entirely, and return ProudFoot his land and his previous state of desolation. There are plenty of options here.

    But either way, and pay close attention now: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.

    Inviting people like you makes ProudFoot’s problem worse! You’re just another burglar according to your position.

    2. The first wave of non-White immigrants were brought-in to the US, Britain, France, Dutch, etc. by the colonists from Africa, Asia, and Middle East – not on humanitarian basis, but as a cheap labor.

    OK, then the Europeans can work out an agreement with the the descendants of those cheap labour regarding privileges and status in the US. Deal.

    Again, this leads to the same conclusion: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.

    How much time do you devote to fretting about the colonialism of say, North Africa?

    How much time do you devote to demanding open borders in the lands of your colonizing kin, like Turkey?

    Or apologizing for the widespread colonialism and rampant slavery done by your kin of say, the Balkans?

    Why do you spend your time demanding “Diversity” in ALL and ONLY white populations?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Bingo! Well said.

    Everywhere whites went / go the locals benefit. When whites leave the locals are worse off.
    , @Rurik

    and return ProudFoot his land and his previous state of desolation. There are plenty of options here.

    But either way, and pay close attention now: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.
     
    when it comes to the West, doormat is the Unz Review's yapping little rabid dog of Islam

    I'm usually very sympathetic to the Muslim nations that the Z-USA has destroyed, and all those terribly suffering millions upon millions of people. I feel they are all owed a great debt from what the Z-USA has done to them.

    But then when I hear the little rabid dog, and imagine that there are others like him, (as surely Islam has attempted thousands of times over centuries to invade and despoil the West), I think we (Western man) should march straight back into Constantinople and toss every single one like doormat right out on their arses- and build a wall there too! On the South Eastern border of a resurgent Constantinople/Christendom.

    Luckily not all Muslims are like the little yapping dog.

    What's comical is that he relentlessly rails against Zionism, but in his secret fantasies wants them to destroy the spirit and will of the West so he can finally get laid, even if he has to take it. ;)
    , @SolontoCroesus
    [Hiding your identity by using multiple handles is not acceptable here. Pick a handle and stick to it or don't be surprised if your future comments are summarily trashed.]

    ProudFoot lives in a dilapidated shed in the wilderness. I come over uninvited, we have a tussle, I win. Over the next 200 years, I turn that shed into a mansion, and the forest into a prosperous town.
     
    1. It's your opinion that ProudFood's "shed" is "dilapidated."

    2. What's the address of the mansion that you so graciously granted him a piece of? Mighty white of you to let him live in a part of the land that you stole from him. Is your estate agent named Netanyahu, perchance?

    3. But of course you presented an analogy, an abstraction, not a real world example.
    , @Rehmat
    I'm sorry to hear that your brother ProudFoot lives in a dilapidated shed in the wilderness. But I'm sure you know why? Because he is a lazy White bum who prefer to live on welfare than work on a pay for which most Asian and African immigrants love to work.

    So please, advise the bum to fabricate some Holocaust story and live like millionaire Joseph Hirt

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/06/12/joseph-hirt-the-latest-holocaust-imposter/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. Sam Shama says:

    Hill gets off scot-free in other news.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  34. Durruti says:
    @Rehmat
    Dr. Giraldi, with due respect, let me state historical facts to refute some of myths you have mentioned in the article.

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.

    2. The first wave of non-White immigrants were brought-in to the US, Britain, France, Dutch, etc. by the colonists from Africa, Asia, and Middle East - not on humanitarian basis, but as a cheap labor.

    3. Calling United States a "sort of democracy" is the biggest example of ignorance. It's in fact a "Dollarcracy".

    4. The "clitoridectomy" and "honor killing" is universal and were practiced in the world even before the arrival of Islam 1400 years ago or the establishment of Pakistan in 1947.

    For example, in Eritrea 89% of Catholics and 85% of Protestants practice female genital mutilation (FGM,) whereas in Niger (94% Muslim) 80% (more according to some surveys) of the people do NOT practice FGM.

    Talking about the called "honor killing" or most probably "domestic violence". Over 30% of women killed in the United States are killed by their husbands or boyfriends. In Italy the figure is 75% are killed by their current of former husbands or boyfriends. In comparison, in Muslim Jordan 25% of women who are killed are killed by male members of their families. This is the highest rate of the crime in Arab and Muslim countries, even though it is lower than the rate of murder of women in the United States by their husbands or boyfriends.

    You see Mr. Giraldi, it's considered a "freedom of speech" to practice "Doublegoodthinking".

    http://newdemocracyworld.org/culture/muslims5.html

    Rehmat,

    Nice response to Giraldi.

    “I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.” Need more be said?

    Your description of American political culture is more accurate than those who are attempting to support the 2016 Electoral Circus, by handicapping for one of the Twin Political Gangs, by supporting one of the puppet candidates, as Giraldi does here:

    “Both Trump supporters and Brexit voters have been dismissed by the establishment media as troglodytes, poorly educated ageing “white people” whose complete irrelevancy will be demonstrated when they all die off, taking their bigotry along with them.”

    Therefore Casino Trump must not be dismissed, but is the superior of the official candidates, (as Giraldi, cleverly pimps for Casino Owner Trump).

    A Democratic Republic knows no Racial, Cultural, or Religious distinctions. As ML King said, We are all members of one Race, the Human race.

    For the Restoration of our Republic!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Salger
    1. You outed yourself as anti-White.

    2. Race is a thing. Contrart to what postmodern Leftoids pretend.

    3. MLK was a plagiarist who supported what was in practice Affirmative Action.

    4. The United States had immigration restricted to Whites of good character.
    , @Rehmat
    I'm afraid you had been fooled by the Jewish Lobby's description of late Martin Luther King Jr. Yes, he said many good things on White racism in America - but many Americans don't know that like Barack Obama, MLK was also groomed by the Organized Jewry.

    January 21, 2013 is going to be remembered for three historical events. Barack Obama’s taking oath on Rev. Martin Luther King’s copy of the Bible, federal celebration of King’s birthday – and a new Jewish prayer in honor of Dr. King. The prayer was distributed nationwide to synagogues representing all major Jewish denomination by the Foundation for Ethnic Understanding. The prayer goes as follows:

    “Heavenly God, who desires us to do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with You, we thank You for inspiring us with the life and example of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.”

    Stuart Appelbaum, president of the Jewish Labor Committee (JLC), reminded American Jewish community that late Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., was not only a great supporter of Israel but he never equated Zionism to racism - an opinion two famous African leaders, Bishop Desmond Tutu (South Africa) and Louis Farrakhan (USA) disagree.....

    https://rehmat1.com/2013/01/22/dr-king-jr-jews-zionism-and-israel/
    , @woodNfish
    The US us not a democracy. It is a federal republic. And the "Human Race" is not a race, it is a species.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. @OilcanFloyd
    SC, I'm not sure how you get that I support having U.S. troops in Muslim nations, or that I view Muslims as a bunch of "Mooslim retards." My wish would be to remove U.S. troops from the ME and to put the people who sent them there on trial, along with the idea and money men who pulled the strings. I support neither the invade nor the invite. Both are wrong.

    I just want to be an American in a country that I recognize, and governed by people like me, who have my best interests at heart, and who have no animosity towards me. Is that really too much to ask?

    A few days ago a friend (an immigrant from Japan) asked me to explain “tongue in cheek.”

    It seems to me part of the conversation on immigration that we in the USA must have would emphasize that borders have two sides, and that US government policy makers have respected neither side of its own borders; they have neither controlled who comes into the USA nor controlled themselves from aggressing outside their own borders.

    “Invade the world invite the world” is cute but perhaps does not frame the argument strongly enough. Phil made the case for the rights of the American people to have their government respect their voices and wishes to protect their national culture and sovereignty, and I applaud and endorse his argument.

    In my view, the American people have an equal right and responsibility to demand that their government stop invading other people’s lands and undermining their governments, sovereignty and cultures. That’s not just a nice thing to do, it’s an obligation, one that is, in my view, even more important than the responsibility to insist that our government control migration into USA. It’s more important because US acts of invading other countries and destabilizing other states amount to criminal acts of aggression.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    SC, Americans have no more say in military policies than they have in immigration policies. Wrong is wrong, and you are putting the blame for the wars where it doesn't belong.

    Flooding our nation with people who don't understand or care about our problems, or who often obviously dislike the natives, is no way to solve our problems. I don't see massive immigration bringing back traditional American isolationism. To a degree, I see immigrants as muddying the waters, especially when they serve as nothing more than mercenaries in the military.

    It's also wrong to say that Americans don't make their voices heard. Warhawks don't do so well, just ask John McCain and Bush I. Even George W. Bush isn't held in high regard by most Republicans at this point.
    , @iffen
    In my view, the American people have an equal right and responsibility to demand that their government stop invading other people’s lands and undermining their governments, sovereignty and cultures.

    But we can't, the Jewspiracy stops us. Duh!
    , @helena
    Well said. Many in UK who oppose mass migration also oppose wars in ME - two 'current affairs' that it has been taboo to speak about in public.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. Wally says: • Website
    @Anonymous
    Antiwhites like you will say literally anything to justify white genocide.

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.
     
    Here's an analogy for you:

    ProudFoot lives in a dilapidated shed in the wilderness. I come over uninvited, we have a tussle, I win. Over the next 200 years, I turn that shed into a mansion, and the forest into a prosperous town.

    This is a moral dilemma. ProudFoot deserves some consideration for being on the land and me coming uninvited, as do I for later building, investing in, and defending it.

    This a property dispute between me and ProudFoot. I can grant him a private part of the mansion and special privileges in the town, for example. I can even decide to vacate the land entirely, and return ProudFoot his land and his previous state of desolation. There are plenty of options here.

    But either way, and pay close attention now: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.

    Inviting people like you makes ProudFoot's problem worse! You're just another burglar according to your position.

    2. The first wave of non-White immigrants were brought-in to the US, Britain, France, Dutch, etc. by the colonists from Africa, Asia, and Middle East – not on humanitarian basis, but as a cheap labor.
     
    OK, then the Europeans can work out an agreement with the the descendants of those cheap labour regarding privileges and status in the US. Deal.

    Again, this leads to the same conclusion: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.

    How much time do you devote to fretting about the colonialism of say, North Africa?

    How much time do you devote to demanding open borders in the lands of your colonizing kin, like Turkey?

    Or apologizing for the widespread colonialism and rampant slavery done by your kin of say, the Balkans?

    Why do you spend your time demanding "Diversity" in ALL and ONLY white populations?

    Bingo! Well said.

    Everywhere whites went / go the locals benefit. When whites leave the locals are worse off.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. Wally says:
    @Rehmat
    Dr. Giraldi, with due respect, let me state historical facts to refute some of myths you have mentioned in the article.

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.

    2. The first wave of non-White immigrants were brought-in to the US, Britain, France, Dutch, etc. by the colonists from Africa, Asia, and Middle East - not on humanitarian basis, but as a cheap labor.

    3. Calling United States a "sort of democracy" is the biggest example of ignorance. It's in fact a "Dollarcracy".

    4. The "clitoridectomy" and "honor killing" is universal and were practiced in the world even before the arrival of Islam 1400 years ago or the establishment of Pakistan in 1947.

    For example, in Eritrea 89% of Catholics and 85% of Protestants practice female genital mutilation (FGM,) whereas in Niger (94% Muslim) 80% (more according to some surveys) of the people do NOT practice FGM.

    Talking about the called "honor killing" or most probably "domestic violence". Over 30% of women killed in the United States are killed by their husbands or boyfriends. In Italy the figure is 75% are killed by their current of former husbands or boyfriends. In comparison, in Muslim Jordan 25% of women who are killed are killed by male members of their families. This is the highest rate of the crime in Arab and Muslim countries, even though it is lower than the rate of murder of women in the United States by their husbands or boyfriends.

    You see Mr. Giraldi, it's considered a "freedom of speech" to practice "Doublegoodthinking".

    http://newdemocracyworld.org/culture/muslims5.html

    So then, American Indians were xenophobic / racist for resisting European migrants.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. I find myself in agreement with with Mr. Giraldi’s argument. At the same time, I would note that that while uncontrolled immigration presents real risks and threatens important American cultural narratives and the social contract, other factors may represent far greater risks and prove more difficult to address effectively.

    The American home and family along with traditional religious narratives are under assault as never before in our history as uncontrolled technological change guided only by what are euphemistically called “market forces” play havoc with core religious and civic values.

    The recent Sunday evening broadcast of CBS’s 60 Minutes featured a segment promoting the latest Disney Star Wars movie.

    Bill Whitaker: It’s not just the fans here; this is global.

    J.J. Abrams: It’s not a movie. It’s bigger than all of us. It’s almost a religion for people.

    Bill Whitaker: What grabbed you about Star Wars?

    J.J. Abrams: The experience of it was so profound and so moving and so funny and so sweet that for me, as a kid — it — it blew my mind. And it was just — it said, “Anything is possible.”

    Abrams has been working on “The Force Awakens” non-stop for three years. He’s managed to keep a tight lid on it. This is one of the few clips Disney has released. He told us his movie is set about 30 years after “Return of the Jedi,” the final film in the first trilogy. At the end of that movie, the good guys had vanquished the empire and subdued the dark side…or so it seemed.

    Hollywood is at the center of the most sophisticated communications system the world has ever seen. The ability of unelected entertainment industry moguls to shape, limit, and direct the public discussion is effectively unchallenged and unfettered. Hollywood’s dominant narrative is violence, enormously lucrative, socially-destabilizing, violent and hyper-violent media product as entertainment fare.

    If you think for a moment Hollywood doesn’t heavily influence government policy, recall that Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative was sold to the public as Star Wars.

    How difficult is it to understand that the deluge of Hollywood’s violent fantasies, dressed up as art and peddled to a public kept ignorant, made gullible, and shamelessly manipulated by broadcast media and a national press that is for all practical purposes a function of the entertainment industry, inform the gun mania that has swept the nation and contribute directly to the epidemic of gun massacre murders in our nation’s schools, shopping malls, places of worship, movie theaters, controlled-access government facilities, and other workplaces?

    The entertainment industry is busy creating a new American religion of violence, a fictional cosmology based on violent, ruthless, relentless competition. Hollywood is replacing the ethic of reciprocity at the heart of the Christian narrative with an ethic of might makes right through violence. Hollywood routinely sensationalizes, glamorizes, and glorifies vengeful, vicious, exciting, technicholor violence, desensitizing large audiences to violence and teaching generations of Americans – and others – that violence is the method of choice for resolving disputes.

    That’s America’s new dominant narrative, and we see it played out on the world stage as perpetual war (that causes mass migrations) and uncritical support for Israel’s slow-motion genocide of the captive Palestinian civilian populations in the West Bank and Gaza that the Israeli arms industry uses as guinea pigs for testing weapons and tactics that are exported to other repressive regimes around the world.

    At the same time, the entertainment uses its influence to corrupt government in the USA at every level. “Follow the Money: the Entertainment Software Association Attack on Video Game Regulation” by Profitt and Susca of Florida State University’s College of Communication and Information documents the legalized bribery of state and federal legislators and bureaucrats in a long list of federal agencies including law enforcement.

    Would that uncontrolled immigration was the nation’s biggest or most pressing problem. But it’s not. Americans have lost control of their government, which is now in the hands of barbarians whose only allegiance is to money and the arbitrary exercise of power. They don’t trust in God. They don’t even know God. And they have robbed Americans of the ability to have a meaningful role in government.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  39. @SolontoCroesus
    A few days ago a friend (an immigrant from Japan) asked me to explain "tongue in cheek."

    ---

    It seems to me part of the conversation on immigration that we in the USA must have would emphasize that borders have two sides, and that US government policy makers have respected neither side of its own borders; they have neither controlled who comes into the USA nor controlled themselves from aggressing outside their own borders.

    "Invade the world invite the world" is cute but perhaps does not frame the argument strongly enough. Phil made the case for the rights of the American people to have their government respect their voices and wishes to protect their national culture and sovereignty, and I applaud and endorse his argument.

    In my view, the American people have an equal right and responsibility to demand that their government stop invading other people's lands and undermining their governments, sovereignty and cultures. That's not just a nice thing to do, it's an obligation, one that is, in my view, even more important than the responsibility to insist that our government control migration into USA. It's more important because US acts of invading other countries and destabilizing other states amount to criminal acts of aggression.

    SC, Americans have no more say in military policies than they have in immigration policies. Wrong is wrong, and you are putting the blame for the wars where it doesn’t belong.

    Flooding our nation with people who don’t understand or care about our problems, or who often obviously dislike the natives, is no way to solve our problems. I don’t see massive immigration bringing back traditional American isolationism. To a degree, I see immigrants as muddying the waters, especially when they serve as nothing more than mercenaries in the military.

    It’s also wrong to say that Americans don’t make their voices heard. Warhawks don’t do so well, just ask John McCain and Bush I. Even George W. Bush isn’t held in high regard by most Republicans at this point.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. iffen says:
    @SolontoCroesus
    A few days ago a friend (an immigrant from Japan) asked me to explain "tongue in cheek."

    ---

    It seems to me part of the conversation on immigration that we in the USA must have would emphasize that borders have two sides, and that US government policy makers have respected neither side of its own borders; they have neither controlled who comes into the USA nor controlled themselves from aggressing outside their own borders.

    "Invade the world invite the world" is cute but perhaps does not frame the argument strongly enough. Phil made the case for the rights of the American people to have their government respect their voices and wishes to protect their national culture and sovereignty, and I applaud and endorse his argument.

    In my view, the American people have an equal right and responsibility to demand that their government stop invading other people's lands and undermining their governments, sovereignty and cultures. That's not just a nice thing to do, it's an obligation, one that is, in my view, even more important than the responsibility to insist that our government control migration into USA. It's more important because US acts of invading other countries and destabilizing other states amount to criminal acts of aggression.

    In my view, the American people have an equal right and responsibility to demand that their government stop invading other people’s lands and undermining their governments, sovereignty and cultures.

    But we can’t, the Jewspiracy stops us. Duh!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    Globalism is an elite supremacist project.

    But it’s difficult to sell to the people as such. It needs mass support, or it must at least guilt-bait the masses into compliance.

    So, globalism bribes the Third World masses with promise of better life in the West. Thus, it has the support of the non-white masses. With their support, the globalist elites have the mantle of ‘anti-racist’ and ‘anti-xenophobic’ credentials. With this, they guilt-bait white masses who object to the invasion. Also, via media and academia, the elites associate everything good with ‘diversity’ and everything bad with homogeneity. It’s ‘more restaurants’ vs the Nazis. (Never mind that Nazis became truly evil when they went from homogeneous mode to the imperialist mode of ruling over diverse peoples.)
    So, many young people poisoned by PC come to see Diversity as the solution to all problems… even to the problems caused by diversity itself. So, if too many Muslims and Africans cause problems, what is needed is even more Africans and Muslims in order to reduce ‘racism’ even more. We are told the problem is that host nation is, as yet, not welcoming enough.

    Anyway, elite agendas are problematic because most people don’t want to serve elite interests.
    So, elites have always associated or bundled their agendas with mass themes.

    So, Russian Tsar and German Kaiser invoked collective national pride in unleashing WWI.
    So, Bush II invoked War on Terror and WMD scares(ostensibly to protect American public) to bring about the invasion of Iraq that was really a narrow War for Israel.
    So, Wall Street allied with Christian dummy masses in the GOP in the 80s and 90s to push through ‘free trade’ and financial deregulation. Since Wall Streeters in the GOP didn’t have enough voters, they needed the hoi polloi Christian dummies to provide the vote, and they did this by invoking ‘family values’ in the GOP platform.
    And NY Democratic elites have their own scheme of privilege, but Jews don’t have enough votes. So, they win over blacks, browns, and women by scare-mongering about GOP as the KKK-lite party.

    Elites have their own agendas, but in order to win over the unsuspecting masses, they bundle their interests with themes that appeal to the dummy masses.
    The elite-globalists in India bundled their economic interests with Hindu Nationalism since they need the votes of many poor people to win. Rich votes alone won’t do the job.

    The elites will play demagogue with left populism or right populism to win votes for an agenda that is above all oligarchic and elitist.

    And so many masses fall for this demagoguery that is often injected with strong moralistic content.

    The paradox of moralism and excessive righteousness(as opposed to true morality) is that they can lead to a kind of nihilism. Notice that some of the most nihilistic people are intensely moralistic. Why?
    Because if you think your values, cause, agenda, or vision is so totally, absolutely, and irrefutably true, then you must use ‘any means necessary’ to defeat the forces of evil.

    Sabrina Rubin Erderly feels so self-righteous that she feels it’s okay to cook up lies if it serves the good cause. (Of course, it serves careerism too via sensationalism and attention-hogging.)

    So, the extremely moralistic Medieval Christians, Bolsheviks, Maoist Red Guards, Khmer rouge, Jim Jones Cult, Muslim Jihadis, Jews Holocausters(who see everything in terms of Jews vs Nazis), Black Panthers, the KKK, US soldiers of Abu Grahib, Black Lives matter thugs, Antifa morons, Homomaniacs(who want WWIII over Russia because nothing is holier than worship of the ‘gay’ butt), and etc. are utterly blind to their rottenness. They are so morally sure of their cause that they believe anything is justified to further it.

    Is it any wonder that ‘hate hoaxes’(the rape of truth)are so common? Even lies are fine as long as they serve the ‘Truth of Righteousness’.
    Even principles like free speech must be sacrifice. All that matters is the Power. To be sure, the means of power are justified for the Noble End, but the ugly means become the end.
    Moralism turns into Nihilism.

    That was the point of the film Baader Meinhof Complex.

    So many SJWs suffer from that ‘complex’, the paradox of moralism into nihilism.
    But then, maybe what they really lust after is power and thrills, and moralism is just a handy excuse for them to indulge themselves.

    Globalism and Utopianism are arrogant.
    A deadly mix.

    We need something on a saner scale, and it is nationalism and humanism.

    No nation should pretend to be or represent the entire world.

    Humans need to accept the truth of their nature and limits instead of reaching for save-the-humanity delusions that see humans as guinea pigs of massive social engineering.

    I think one negative byproduct of America is that it is so big, so rich, so diverse, and so everything that it is like a world unto itself. If the New World had consisted of land mass the size of Germany, the Anglo settlers would have made a nice country, but it would have been seen as a nation like any other. But US was so vast and could take in so many people that it created the impossible ideal that any nation could itself be the world, indeed should and must. And this template is now applied even on small European nations.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  42. Salger says:
    @Durruti
    Rehmat,

    Nice response to Giraldi.

    "I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority." Need more be said?

    Your description of American political culture is more accurate than those who are attempting to support the 2016 Electoral Circus, by handicapping for one of the Twin Political Gangs, by supporting one of the puppet candidates, as Giraldi does here:

    "Both Trump supporters and Brexit voters have been dismissed by the establishment media as troglodytes, poorly educated ageing “white people” whose complete irrelevancy will be demonstrated when they all die off, taking their bigotry along with them."

    Therefore Casino Trump must not be dismissed, but is the superior of the official candidates, (as Giraldi, cleverly pimps for Casino Owner Trump).

    A Democratic Republic knows no Racial, Cultural, or Religious distinctions. As ML King said, We are all members of one Race, the Human race.

    For the Restoration of our Republic!

    1. You outed yourself as anti-White.

    2. Race is a thing. Contrart to what postmodern Leftoids pretend.

    3. MLK was a plagiarist who supported what was in practice Affirmative Action.

    4. The United States had immigration restricted to Whites of good character.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    "The United States had immigration restricted to Whites of good character."

    Are you applying that Russian Jew White immigrants were not of "good character"?

    Beware of Abraham Foxman's dagger you 'antisemite'.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. Rurik says:
    @Anonymous
    Antiwhites like you will say literally anything to justify white genocide.

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.
     
    Here's an analogy for you:

    ProudFoot lives in a dilapidated shed in the wilderness. I come over uninvited, we have a tussle, I win. Over the next 200 years, I turn that shed into a mansion, and the forest into a prosperous town.

    This is a moral dilemma. ProudFoot deserves some consideration for being on the land and me coming uninvited, as do I for later building, investing in, and defending it.

    This a property dispute between me and ProudFoot. I can grant him a private part of the mansion and special privileges in the town, for example. I can even decide to vacate the land entirely, and return ProudFoot his land and his previous state of desolation. There are plenty of options here.

    But either way, and pay close attention now: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.

    Inviting people like you makes ProudFoot's problem worse! You're just another burglar according to your position.

    2. The first wave of non-White immigrants were brought-in to the US, Britain, France, Dutch, etc. by the colonists from Africa, Asia, and Middle East – not on humanitarian basis, but as a cheap labor.
     
    OK, then the Europeans can work out an agreement with the the descendants of those cheap labour regarding privileges and status in the US. Deal.

    Again, this leads to the same conclusion: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.

    How much time do you devote to fretting about the colonialism of say, North Africa?

    How much time do you devote to demanding open borders in the lands of your colonizing kin, like Turkey?

    Or apologizing for the widespread colonialism and rampant slavery done by your kin of say, the Balkans?

    Why do you spend your time demanding "Diversity" in ALL and ONLY white populations?

    and return ProudFoot his land and his previous state of desolation. There are plenty of options here.

    But either way, and pay close attention now: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.

    when it comes to the West, doormat is the Unz Review’s yapping little rabid dog of Islam

    I’m usually very sympathetic to the Muslim nations that the Z-USA has destroyed, and all those terribly suffering millions upon millions of people. I feel they are all owed a great debt from what the Z-USA has done to them.

    But then when I hear the little rabid dog, and imagine that there are others like him, (as surely Islam has attempted thousands of times over centuries to invade and despoil the West), I think we (Western man) should march straight back into Constantinople and toss every single one like doormat right out on their arses- and build a wall there too! On the South Eastern border of a resurgent Constantinople/Christendom.

    Luckily not all Muslims are like the little yapping dog.

    What’s comical is that he relentlessly rails against Zionism, but in his secret fantasies wants them to destroy the spirit and will of the West so he can finally get laid, even if he has to take it. ;)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. Cyrano says:

    Multiculturalism or chaotic and unrestricted immigration breaks down social cohesion, and guess what – you need social cohesion if you want a united front against the government. In other words, multiculturalism is good for preventing regime change revolutions.

    The message that the government is sending to their citizens via the uncontrolled immigration is: If you don’t like us – that’s too bad, we can replace you with someone who will love us – immigrants from the third world. Immigration takes away jobs from the natives and keeps them weak. Instead of outsourcing the jobs overseas, with immigration – the jobs are outsourced internally – to the newcomers.

    The newcomers feel nothing but gratitude for the governments in their new countries and they are the population that the government can count on the most in terms of loyalty. Love is easy to buy, and love bought by the government from third world immigrants is way cheaper than trying to buy love from the indigenous population which demands ever increasing wages, social services and all kinds of other privileges.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  45. @Anonymous
    Antiwhites like you will say literally anything to justify white genocide.

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.
     
    Here's an analogy for you:

    ProudFoot lives in a dilapidated shed in the wilderness. I come over uninvited, we have a tussle, I win. Over the next 200 years, I turn that shed into a mansion, and the forest into a prosperous town.

    This is a moral dilemma. ProudFoot deserves some consideration for being on the land and me coming uninvited, as do I for later building, investing in, and defending it.

    This a property dispute between me and ProudFoot. I can grant him a private part of the mansion and special privileges in the town, for example. I can even decide to vacate the land entirely, and return ProudFoot his land and his previous state of desolation. There are plenty of options here.

    But either way, and pay close attention now: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.

    Inviting people like you makes ProudFoot's problem worse! You're just another burglar according to your position.

    2. The first wave of non-White immigrants were brought-in to the US, Britain, France, Dutch, etc. by the colonists from Africa, Asia, and Middle East – not on humanitarian basis, but as a cheap labor.
     
    OK, then the Europeans can work out an agreement with the the descendants of those cheap labour regarding privileges and status in the US. Deal.

    Again, this leads to the same conclusion: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.

    How much time do you devote to fretting about the colonialism of say, North Africa?

    How much time do you devote to demanding open borders in the lands of your colonizing kin, like Turkey?

    Or apologizing for the widespread colonialism and rampant slavery done by your kin of say, the Balkans?

    Why do you spend your time demanding "Diversity" in ALL and ONLY white populations?

    [Hiding your identity by using multiple handles is not acceptable here. Pick a handle and stick to it or don't be surprised if your future comments are summarily trashed.]

    ProudFoot lives in a dilapidated shed in the wilderness. I come over uninvited, we have a tussle, I win. Over the next 200 years, I turn that shed into a mansion, and the forest into a prosperous town.

    1. It’s your opinion that ProudFood’s “shed” is “dilapidated.”

    2. What’s the address of the mansion that you so graciously granted him a piece of? Mighty white of you to let him live in a part of the land that you stole from him. Is your estate agent named Netanyahu, perchance?

    3. But of course you presented an analogy, an abstraction, not a real world example.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Salger
    When does Saudi Arabia get Open Borders.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @RudyM
    I'm still pretty ambivalent on this topic. I don't believe in open borders but given American history, I can't swallow the idea of making the US as white as possible. It seems like a slap in the face to the Native Americans whose land this was initially, to the descendants of African brought here as slaves, to those who descend from Hispanics who became US citizens through war (or, more truthfully, conquest), and to all who have legally come here as immigrants. Given that history, I cannot be comfortable with claims that the US is for white people--period.

    At the same time, I am honestly concerned where things are headed if whites become a minority, especially given some of the rhetoric of those who cheer on that supposed inevitability. It's also true that, by and large, our institutions are western European, heavily indebted to England and Germany, and rooted in a Protestant heritage. I think it's fair to want immigrants who are likely to share the political values our (admittedly, extremely imperfect) institutions are based upon.

    I can’t swallow the idea of making the US as white as possible.

    Yet for most of our history, we were as white as possible.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Rurik says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    I don’t really care what Muslims believe, or how they behave, as long as they believe and do in their homelands.
     
    With you 300%, OilcanFloyd; get those damn Muslim military bases out of their 800-odd locations throughout the Yoo-nited States! Don't these people respect borders and sovereignty, fer chrissakes! Buncha Mooslim retards.

    I don’t really care what Muslims believe, or how they behave, as long as they believe and do in their homelands.

    With you 300%, OilcanFloyd; get those damn Muslim military bases out of their 800-odd locations throughout the Yoo-nited States! Don’t these people respect borders and sovereignty, fer chrissakes! Buncha Mooslim retards.

    the one and only reason the Zio-boyz are able to foist these assorted wars and atrocities and outrages against the Islamic nations- using the Western peoples and militaries like the US and England and Germany- is because the people of these nations have no sense of themselves. They’ve been Zionised, and are now war fodder zombies in the service of Zion. Duh

    how many wars against Islam have nationalists like Pat Buchannan advocated, eh SC?

    or even David Duke for that matter.

    all the exact same people speaking out against the Islamic invasions of the West are the exact same people speaking out against the wars and military invasions of those same countries. Like myself for instance. Or even PG here. We don’t like the strife and hatred and blood-shed and slaughter, whether the invasions are going out from the West into the Muslim world, or from the Muslim world into the West. We want peace and mutual respect. We don’t want hatred and wars. We’re not filled with an imperative to get back at anyone. We just want the world to act like sane people who are not killing and invading each other.

    Or, hadn’t you noticed that?

    The most powerful and vociferous voices against the wars and the saber rattling against Iran and Russia are the exact same voices saying we don’t want to hand over complete and absolute control of our nations to the Zionists, who’re obviously using immigration to weaken our voices and rule with absolute power, and what then SC? Had you even considered that?

    No, obviously not.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. Salger says:
    @Rehmat
    Dr. Giraldi, with due respect, let me state historical facts to refute some of myths you have mentioned in the article.

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.

    2. The first wave of non-White immigrants were brought-in to the US, Britain, France, Dutch, etc. by the colonists from Africa, Asia, and Middle East - not on humanitarian basis, but as a cheap labor.

    3. Calling United States a "sort of democracy" is the biggest example of ignorance. It's in fact a "Dollarcracy".

    4. The "clitoridectomy" and "honor killing" is universal and were practiced in the world even before the arrival of Islam 1400 years ago or the establishment of Pakistan in 1947.

    For example, in Eritrea 89% of Catholics and 85% of Protestants practice female genital mutilation (FGM,) whereas in Niger (94% Muslim) 80% (more according to some surveys) of the people do NOT practice FGM.

    Talking about the called "honor killing" or most probably "domestic violence". Over 30% of women killed in the United States are killed by their husbands or boyfriends. In Italy the figure is 75% are killed by their current of former husbands or boyfriends. In comparison, in Muslim Jordan 25% of women who are killed are killed by male members of their families. This is the highest rate of the crime in Arab and Muslim countries, even though it is lower than the rate of murder of women in the United States by their husbands or boyfriends.

    You see Mr. Giraldi, it's considered a "freedom of speech" to practice "Doublegoodthinking".

    http://newdemocracyworld.org/culture/muslims5.html

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.

    http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/06/02/the-non-genocide-of-northern-native-americans/

    http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/16/the-solutrean-hypothesis/

    https://board.freedomainradio.com/topic/47655-youtube-the-truth-about-the-native-american-genocide/

    You might as well demand Saudi Arabia have Open Borders for the conquest sprees carried out by Muslims. And throw in Japan for that matter. And Mongolia.

    4.

    Islam is feminist friendly!

    http://catalogingthedeclineofthewest.tumblr.com/tagged/islam-and-women

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Salger says:
    @SolontoCroesus
    [Hiding your identity by using multiple handles is not acceptable here. Pick a handle and stick to it or don't be surprised if your future comments are summarily trashed.]

    ProudFoot lives in a dilapidated shed in the wilderness. I come over uninvited, we have a tussle, I win. Over the next 200 years, I turn that shed into a mansion, and the forest into a prosperous town.
     
    1. It's your opinion that ProudFood's "shed" is "dilapidated."

    2. What's the address of the mansion that you so graciously granted him a piece of? Mighty white of you to let him live in a part of the land that you stole from him. Is your estate agent named Netanyahu, perchance?

    3. But of course you presented an analogy, an abstraction, not a real world example.

    When does Saudi Arabia get Open Borders.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    http://stuartschneiderman.blogspot.com/2016/07/a-new-world-order.html

    “Last week Putin delivered an address before the All Russian Historical Assembly about the importance of teaching Russian history to Russia’s citizens.
    Putin used Israel as a model for how historical knowledge empowers a nation.
    Putin said, “Israel… relies and develops its identity and brings up its citizens with reliance on historical examples.” Putin’s use of Israel as a positive role model showed that Putin’s sudden courtship of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is not solely the product of strategic and economic interests. He happens to admire Israel.”

    What a wacky world.

    Putin and Trump praise Israel and say gentiles must admire/emulate the Jewish Zionists.

    But many Jews in US and EU hate Putin and Trump the most.

    In relation to gentiles, they think in terms of “Do as we say, not as we do.”

    Nationalism and positive historical consciousness are exclusive to the Tribe.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  51. Rurik says:

    Putin and Trump praise Israel and say gentiles must admire/emulate the Jewish Zionists.

    But many Jews in US and EU hate Putin and Trump the most.

    In relation to gentiles, they think in terms of “Do as we say, not as we do.”

    if Russia and the West actually did emulate Israel, Islam and its adherents would be gone in the blink of an eye

    the wacky thing is that while Israel genocides the Muslims (and Christians) out of their (respective) lands, (with the eager assistance of the Western governments and militaries), the people of the West are urged to genocide themselves.

    And why? Because in the past “they” committed genocide, (the same thing Israel is committing today)

    it is a wacky, wacky world, no doubt

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  52. Rurik says:
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  53. Rurik says:
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  54. jtgw says: • Website

    There was a time when the US had open borders. Then again, they also allowed the states a lot of power to regulate residence of non-citizens, and citizenship itself was generally restricted to white males “of good character”. The need to regulate immigration at the federal level is generally a product of post-Civil War centralization, as well as the distorting effects of welfare in attracting indigents and social undesirables.

    Should the collective be allowed to regulate immigration at all, though? The libertarian in me says no. However, the libertarian in me also recognizes that we don’t live in a libertarian system. If we had true free markets and freedom of association, then only those who were invited would immigrate; there would be no need for centralized regulation of immigration. But when natives are forced to associate with immigrants and forced to pay for their residence and sustenance, then it’s another matter entirely.

    If we declared a moratorium on immigration, we would exclude all those undesirables. However, we would also exclude the desirables: the entrepreneurs, the talented individuals who increase productivity, generating wealth for everybody. Discerning the desirable from the undesirable is simply not a task that the government is up to. How can the federal bureaucracy really know how many of each kind of immigrant we need? This is something only the market, operating under minimal regulation, can determine. Sadly, very few candidates for office are making a straightforward call for decentralization and deregulation, which is the best answer to this problem.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Chris Mallory
    Every wave of immigration since 1800 has been bad for Americans and our freedoms. We should have closed the borders in 1800 and spared our nation the hordes of Irish, Germans and other undesirables.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    http://sputniknews.com/latam/20160705/1042491546/brazil-olympics-water-bacteria.html

    Athletes from all over the world can wade in the fecal matter of Diversity.

    Worship homo fecal penetration, and row/swim in diverse fecal pollution.

    But it’s DIVERSE, so it’s the pollution of hope.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  56. JackOH says:

    Thanks, Phil, for this good, sober article. In my area, the mostly English-stock steelmakers’ appetite for and abuses of cheap, pliant Euro-immigrant labor from the 1870s on were checked by institutions such as the Ku Klux Klan (the Northern variant), the Mafia, organized labor, ethnic solidarity organizations, sometimes government, and sometimes organized do-gooders. It could be very touchy. Common religion could also buffer serious intra- and inter-ethnic animosity and workplace quarrels.

    Those institutions that once moderated corporate excesses are gone or severely diminished. Government is a plaything of corporate interests that have an expert understanding of how to use the media for social control. I’m not seeing a good ending here with Corporate America turning most, but not all, Americans into happy, consumerist idiots.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  57. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Chris Mallory
    Do you mean the descendants of the British Protestants who founded the United States (the only people who should be called native Americans)? Or the tribes of Asian immigrants who are better called by their tribal names?

    If they were British Protestants who founded something called the United States, shouldn’t they be called British Protestants or United Statesians or British Protestant United Statesians, etc.?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    Maybe increasing diversity not good for homos.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/06/world/americas/brazil-anti-gay-violence.html?smid=tw-nytimesworld&smtyp=cur

    In the US, homos are underoverdogs. They are overdogs or topdogs pretending to be underdogs, a trick learned from Jews and Christians(who carried on with ‘fed to lions’ shtick long after they gained dominance).

    In Brazil, a mess of a nation, it’s just dog eat dog. Everyone faces possible mayhem, and no one is spared.

    Anyway, it looks like wild blacks and Latin thugs are more dangerous to homos than Muslims are.

    In the Muslim world, homos know they better stay in the closet. So, they remain safe.

    In wild Brazil, the message to all is ‘do what you want’.
    So, homos act wildly homos, blacks act wildly black, and Latim machismo is in overdrive. And all these wild transgressions don’t see eye to eye.

    It’s New York in the 70s x 100.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  59. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  60. Rehmat says:
    @OilcanFloyd
    Rehmat, how many Muslims would there be today without the Muslim conquests? By your logic, Islam is completely invalid.

    I don't really care what Muslims believe, or how they behave, as long as they believe and do in their homelands. If only I could turn over the Western leaders who have destroyed the ME for Qadaffi treatment, I would gladly do so. Would you be willing to turn over Muslims who are guilty of harming innocent non-Muslims?

    OilcanFloyd, how many Jews there would be today without racism and hatred towards over five billion non-Jews. By your logic, Judaism is completely invalid – just ask British Jewish writer, peace activist and ex-blogger.

    a great majority of 3.7 billion Muslims and Christians don’t care what Jews believe, but they do fear their evil nature, as long as they do it homelands from where they’re expelled over 108 times. If I only can convince the western leaders who had killed hundreds of thousands of Jewish evil-doers, I gladly tell them to listen to American Jewish writer Steve Lendman very, very carefully, who says kill all those bastard Jews who killed 3,000 Christians and Muslims at WTC on September 11, 2001.

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/03/10/paul-eisen-judaism-is-not-religion-of-peace/

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    My point is that if you claim that America is invalid as a nation, and that white Americans have no claim to the nation that their ancestors founded, colonized, settled and built because of European expansion at the expense of the native tribes, then Islam itself is invalid due to Muslim expansion. Are you willing to disown Allah, Muhammad and the Muslim conquests?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. Rehmat says:
    @Anonymous
    Antiwhites like you will say literally anything to justify white genocide.

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.
     
    Here's an analogy for you:

    ProudFoot lives in a dilapidated shed in the wilderness. I come over uninvited, we have a tussle, I win. Over the next 200 years, I turn that shed into a mansion, and the forest into a prosperous town.

    This is a moral dilemma. ProudFoot deserves some consideration for being on the land and me coming uninvited, as do I for later building, investing in, and defending it.

    This a property dispute between me and ProudFoot. I can grant him a private part of the mansion and special privileges in the town, for example. I can even decide to vacate the land entirely, and return ProudFoot his land and his previous state of desolation. There are plenty of options here.

    But either way, and pay close attention now: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.

    Inviting people like you makes ProudFoot's problem worse! You're just another burglar according to your position.

    2. The first wave of non-White immigrants were brought-in to the US, Britain, France, Dutch, etc. by the colonists from Africa, Asia, and Middle East – not on humanitarian basis, but as a cheap labor.
     
    OK, then the Europeans can work out an agreement with the the descendants of those cheap labour regarding privileges and status in the US. Deal.

    Again, this leads to the same conclusion: This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH RANDOM THIRD PARTIES LIKE REHMAT ABDUL MOHAMMED BLAHBLAH WHATEVER.

    How much time do you devote to fretting about the colonialism of say, North Africa?

    How much time do you devote to demanding open borders in the lands of your colonizing kin, like Turkey?

    Or apologizing for the widespread colonialism and rampant slavery done by your kin of say, the Balkans?

    Why do you spend your time demanding "Diversity" in ALL and ONLY white populations?

    I’m sorry to hear that your brother ProudFoot lives in a dilapidated shed in the wilderness. But I’m sure you know why? Because he is a lazy White bum who prefer to live on welfare than work on a pay for which most Asian and African immigrants love to work.

    So please, advise the bum to fabricate some Holocaust story and live like millionaire Joseph Hirt

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/06/12/joseph-hirt-the-latest-holocaust-imposter/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Rehmat says:
    @Durruti
    Rehmat,

    Nice response to Giraldi.

    "I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority." Need more be said?

    Your description of American political culture is more accurate than those who are attempting to support the 2016 Electoral Circus, by handicapping for one of the Twin Political Gangs, by supporting one of the puppet candidates, as Giraldi does here:

    "Both Trump supporters and Brexit voters have been dismissed by the establishment media as troglodytes, poorly educated ageing “white people” whose complete irrelevancy will be demonstrated when they all die off, taking their bigotry along with them."

    Therefore Casino Trump must not be dismissed, but is the superior of the official candidates, (as Giraldi, cleverly pimps for Casino Owner Trump).

    A Democratic Republic knows no Racial, Cultural, or Religious distinctions. As ML King said, We are all members of one Race, the Human race.

    For the Restoration of our Republic!

    I’m afraid you had been fooled by the Jewish Lobby’s description of late Martin Luther King Jr. Yes, he said many good things on White racism in America – but many Americans don’t know that like Barack Obama, MLK was also groomed by the Organized Jewry.

    January 21, 2013 is going to be remembered for three historical events. Barack Obama’s taking oath on Rev. Martin Luther King’s copy of the Bible, federal celebration of King’s birthday – and a new Jewish prayer in honor of Dr. King. The prayer was distributed nationwide to synagogues representing all major Jewish denomination by the Foundation for Ethnic Understanding. The prayer goes as follows:

    “Heavenly God, who desires us to do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with You, we thank You for inspiring us with the life and example of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.”

    Stuart Appelbaum, president of the Jewish Labor Committee (JLC), reminded American Jewish community that late Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., was not only a great supporter of Israel but he never equated Zionism to racism – an opinion two famous African leaders, Bishop Desmond Tutu (South Africa) and Louis Farrakhan (USA) disagree…..

    https://rehmat1.com/2013/01/22/dr-king-jr-jews-zionism-and-israel/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Durruti
    Monsieur Rehmat,

    You insist:

    "I’m afraid you had been fooled by the Jewish Lobby’s description of late Martin Luther King Jr. Yes, he said many good things on White racism in America – but many Americans don’t know that like Barack Obama, MLK was also groomed by the Organized Jewry."

    I suppose so. Perhaps, I also was fooled by the American Government's assassination of ML King. I guess the American imperialist Government and the CIA/MOSSAD liked ML King so much, that they assassinated him for no reason at all. Possibly you believe that ML King was shot by a white racist who had no connections to the American Zionist government. Perhaps you believe he was not shot at all.

    Perhaps ML King's resistance to the American imperialist war against Vietnam is not of consequence (to you). Perhaps you have an explanation for the overthrow of America's Republic on November 22, 1963, the murder of the Kennedy's, ML King, Malcolm X, Fred Hampton, John Lennon, and millions of others.

    What Applebaum reminded people of is not proof, as Applebaum was a supporter of Land Thievery and ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians. His words hold little sway before the court of history. There is one essential clue as to the difference between Applebaum and ML King; King was assassinated by the American Zionist Government, along with the Kennedys, Malcolm X, Fred Hampton, Patrice Lumumba, and thousands of other resisters, and Applebaum was not.

    The Jewish lobby cannot fool me; perhaps, you wish to.

    Restore the American Republic! You always talk around that necessity. Why do you do that?

    Durruti
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. KenH says:
    @War for Blair Mountain
    I just want to follow up the following:A very severe labor scarcity must never never be used as an excuse to race-replace The Historic Native Born White American Working Class. The Greedy Cheating White Male MEGA-CEOs go hysterical over severe labor scarcities to justify race-replacing The Historic Native Born White American Working Class in places such as the area surrounding Gruman Corp where Trump held his Rally in the old LEM building. two months ago.


    The horrible immigration moratorium proposal of vdare.com concedes the labor scarcity issue to the race-replacement enthusiasts such as the Kenyan Foreigner who now threatens Conservative Orthodox Christian Russia with thermonuclear extermination on a daily basis.


    The homosexual War Criminal Kenyan Foreigner would never have had a snowballs chance in hell of ever being elected POTUS in 2008+2012 if the 1965 Immigration Reform Act had not been passed, and if there had been a National Origins Immigration Policy that excluded all nonwhites. His Nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc never would have existed in the US and his Muslim Kenyan Father would never have been allowed into the US to knock up the 17 year old weirdo Anne Dunham.

    You are right. Japan is aging and experiencing a labor shortage in some industries but since they are both sane and racially conscious (unlike most feckless white Americans and their equally feckless shabbos goy politicians) they steadfastly refuse to throw open their borders to the third world. Instead they are opting for increased automation.

    The Japanese are under no illusion that Japan is a proposition nation, an experiment and that anybody can become Japanese.

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    KENH


    I don't want the US born children of Asian and Muslim legal immigrants to assimilate. If they assimilate...it will much easier for them to vote The Historic Native Born White American Working Class into a racial minority every 4 years.

    I want them to look...talk...and act foriegn...much easier to round them up for mass expulsion!!!!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:
    @KenH
    You are right. Japan is aging and experiencing a labor shortage in some industries but since they are both sane and racially conscious (unlike most feckless white Americans and their equally feckless shabbos goy politicians) they steadfastly refuse to throw open their borders to the third world. Instead they are opting for increased automation.

    The Japanese are under no illusion that Japan is a proposition nation, an experiment and that anybody can become Japanese.

    KENH

    I don’t want the US born children of Asian and Muslim legal immigrants to assimilate. If they assimilate…it will much easier for them to vote The Historic Native Born White American Working Class into a racial minority every 4 years.

    I want them to look…talk…and act foriegn…much easier to round them up for mass expulsion!!!!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. @Rehmat
    OilcanFloyd, how many Jews there would be today without racism and hatred towards over five billion non-Jews. By your logic, Judaism is completely invalid - just ask British Jewish writer, peace activist and ex-blogger.

    a great majority of 3.7 billion Muslims and Christians don't care what Jews believe, but they do fear their evil nature, as long as they do it homelands from where they're expelled over 108 times. If I only can convince the western leaders who had killed hundreds of thousands of Jewish evil-doers, I gladly tell them to listen to American Jewish writer Steve Lendman very, very carefully, who says kill all those bastard Jews who killed 3,000 Christians and Muslims at WTC on September 11, 2001.

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/03/10/paul-eisen-judaism-is-not-religion-of-peace/

    My point is that if you claim that America is invalid as a nation, and that white Americans have no claim to the nation that their ancestors founded, colonized, settled and built because of European expansion at the expense of the native tribes, then Islam itself is invalid due to Muslim expansion. Are you willing to disown Allah, Muhammad and the Muslim conquests?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Durruti says:
    @Rehmat
    I'm afraid you had been fooled by the Jewish Lobby's description of late Martin Luther King Jr. Yes, he said many good things on White racism in America - but many Americans don't know that like Barack Obama, MLK was also groomed by the Organized Jewry.

    January 21, 2013 is going to be remembered for three historical events. Barack Obama’s taking oath on Rev. Martin Luther King’s copy of the Bible, federal celebration of King’s birthday – and a new Jewish prayer in honor of Dr. King. The prayer was distributed nationwide to synagogues representing all major Jewish denomination by the Foundation for Ethnic Understanding. The prayer goes as follows:

    “Heavenly God, who desires us to do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with You, we thank You for inspiring us with the life and example of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.”

    Stuart Appelbaum, president of the Jewish Labor Committee (JLC), reminded American Jewish community that late Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., was not only a great supporter of Israel but he never equated Zionism to racism - an opinion two famous African leaders, Bishop Desmond Tutu (South Africa) and Louis Farrakhan (USA) disagree.....

    https://rehmat1.com/2013/01/22/dr-king-jr-jews-zionism-and-israel/

    Monsieur Rehmat,

    You insist:

    “I’m afraid you had been fooled by the Jewish Lobby’s description of late Martin Luther King Jr. Yes, he said many good things on White racism in America – but many Americans don’t know that like Barack Obama, MLK was also groomed by the Organized Jewry.”

    I suppose so. Perhaps, I also was fooled by the American Government’s assassination of ML King. I guess the American imperialist Government and the CIA/MOSSAD liked ML King so much, that they assassinated him for no reason at all. Possibly you believe that ML King was shot by a white racist who had no connections to the American Zionist government. Perhaps you believe he was not shot at all.

    Perhaps ML King’s resistance to the American imperialist war against Vietnam is not of consequence (to you). Perhaps you have an explanation for the overthrow of America’s Republic on November 22, 1963, the murder of the Kennedy’s, ML King, Malcolm X, Fred Hampton, John Lennon, and millions of others.

    What Applebaum reminded people of is not proof, as Applebaum was a supporter of Land Thievery and ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians. His words hold little sway before the court of history. There is one essential clue as to the difference between Applebaum and ML King; King was assassinated by the American Zionist Government, along with the Kennedys, Malcolm X, Fred Hampton, Patrice Lumumba, and thousands of other resisters, and Applebaum was not.

    The Jewish lobby cannot fool me; perhaps, you wish to.

    Restore the American Republic! You always talk around that necessity. Why do you do that?

    Durruti

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. @Rehmat
    Dr. Giraldi, with due respect, let me state historical facts to refute some of myths you have mentioned in the article.

    I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority.

    2. The first wave of non-White immigrants were brought-in to the US, Britain, France, Dutch, etc. by the colonists from Africa, Asia, and Middle East - not on humanitarian basis, but as a cheap labor.

    3. Calling United States a "sort of democracy" is the biggest example of ignorance. It's in fact a "Dollarcracy".

    4. The "clitoridectomy" and "honor killing" is universal and were practiced in the world even before the arrival of Islam 1400 years ago or the establishment of Pakistan in 1947.

    For example, in Eritrea 89% of Catholics and 85% of Protestants practice female genital mutilation (FGM,) whereas in Niger (94% Muslim) 80% (more according to some surveys) of the people do NOT practice FGM.

    Talking about the called "honor killing" or most probably "domestic violence". Over 30% of women killed in the United States are killed by their husbands or boyfriends. In Italy the figure is 75% are killed by their current of former husbands or boyfriends. In comparison, in Muslim Jordan 25% of women who are killed are killed by male members of their families. This is the highest rate of the crime in Arab and Muslim countries, even though it is lower than the rate of murder of women in the United States by their husbands or boyfriends.

    You see Mr. Giraldi, it's considered a "freedom of speech" to practice "Doublegoodthinking".

    http://newdemocracyworld.org/culture/muslims5.html

    1) Disease killed most of the Native Americans not the White Man. The diseases raced ahead of the White Men so that in most places all they found were empty lands. Furthermore, the various American Indians had no problem at all killing and stealing land from each other. So who do you give it back to? The evil White Man did not Genocide the Natives that is one huge myth. In fact it’s very likely that there are more American Indians in America today than when this nation was founded. Yes there were some wars but nobody made an attempt to wipe out all the American Indians that is simply not true.

    2) Who cares how the Evil White Dudes first got here? We came here in various ways and built a great nation with a culture that is envied around the world. It’s not something to be ashamed of and the ungrateful assclowns who don’t like the nation and culture we built, can go find someplace else to live if they don’t like it. You don’t need to turn the US into Mexico when there is already a Mexico. If you like that culture go and live their, the same is true for any other place on Earth.

    3) non-sequitur

    4) Is a Straw-man because he never suggested that we want them coming here either.

    Your last point is simply ridiculous. All cultures have problems with violence but not all cultures have a code where murder is acceptable. If you want to live in a place where it is acceptable go live there because we don’t want you.

    To put it very bluntly, if you don’t want to be an American who shares our common values then you don’t belong here. It literally took thousands of years to create Western Culture and we are not going to toss it away for ungrateful people who think so very little of us.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {.... if you don’t want to be an American....}

    The IslamoFascist ingrate parasite is currently squatting in Christian Canada, taking advantage of Christian Canadian hospitality, sucking up benefits, while proselytizing for Islamist supremacists. The ingrate parasite escaped the s__hole in his native S___tistan (Pakistan) to settle in complete safety and security in Christian Canada.

    The ingrate IslamoFascist parasite is currently scratching out a living shoveling pig s____ in a Canadian-bacon pig farm. He is a certified pig s____ "engineer".
    , @Rehmat
    So explain Sherlock Homes why Organized Jewry persecute western scholars who claim that most of the Jews died of disease in Nazi camps and were not gassed by Nazis?

    On April 6, 2016, a court in Paris exposed the true face of ‘freedom of speech’ in the Western nations. It fined Jean-Marie Le Pen, the founder and former leader of country’s third largest political party, Front National, 30,000 euros (£24,000) for denying the existence of Nazi gas chambers.

    The judges ordered their verdict to be published in three major newspapers (all owned by Zionist Jews) and said Le Pen must also pay €10,001 in damages to three Jewish charities that brought the case.

    In April 2015, French Jewish Lobby CRIF took him to court for saying the Nazi gas chambers were a ‘detail’ of history.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/04/07/french-leader-fined-for-denying-gas-chambers/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. A “sensible” immigration policy would take into account the needs of labor, business, the economy and the immigrants themselves. It has become obvious that the culture and traditions of the country must also enter the equation. But such a sensible policy would need to be formulated, legislated and enforced by an honest and intelligent government. Washington is neither.

    The people who own the federal government need open borders and free trade to further enrich themselves and to rob nation states even of their sovereignty. They want no interference from sovereign states to stand between them and the total exploitation of the people of planet earth. Global Feudalism is the goal with the .01% as masters and the rest of us as serfs. Donald Trump has said “You can’t have a country without borders”. That is exactly the point. The neoliberal agenda calls for the transfer of sovereignty from nation states to corporate conglomerates. This dovetails nicely with the neoconservative agenda for ruling the world by force of arms. First sovereignty is stolen by Washington and subsequently transferred to the stateless global monopolists.

    Don’t bother arguing immigration policy with the people responsible for it. They are agents of the .01%. They will tell you stupid shit like diversity is our strength. Or they will tell you they would like to help but the D’s won’t cooperate. Or the R’s won’t cooperate. I recommend you get behind the Trump Campaign. Trump wants to preserve the nation state. Look around and take note of who is with you and who is against you. Whatever happens in November the Trump supporters will be the van guard of American resistance to the new Feudalism.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  69. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3675154/Left-wing-German-politician-raped-migrants-admits-LIED-police-attackers-nationality-did-not-want-encourage-racism.html

    Orwellian Virtue.

    Lie is Truth, and truth is Evil because truth is ‘racist’.

    But then, US does this by referring to black thugs as ‘teens’ and ‘youths’.

    This is to be expected in a world where a man with wig is a ‘woman’ and a homo man’s fecal hole is the ‘sexual’ equivalent of a vagina that births life.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  70. @RudyM

    The “clitoridectomy” and “honor killing” is universal and were practiced in the world even before the arrival of Islam 1400 years ago or the establishment of Pakistan in 1947.
     
    Giraldi did not link clitoridectomy to Islam. And it is far from globally universal, to the best of my knowledge.
    Read More
    • Replies: @RudyM
    Yes, it predates Islam, but was also not stamped out by Islam. Not sure about your point.

    An African-American woman I was friends with a long while back, an old hippie, once said she was glad her ancestors were brought to the U.S. from Africa because if she were back in Africa they'd cut off her clitoris.

    She periodically said things of that sort that scandalized me at the time.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. @RudyM
    I'm still pretty ambivalent on this topic. I don't believe in open borders but given American history, I can't swallow the idea of making the US as white as possible. It seems like a slap in the face to the Native Americans whose land this was initially, to the descendants of African brought here as slaves, to those who descend from Hispanics who became US citizens through war (or, more truthfully, conquest), and to all who have legally come here as immigrants. Given that history, I cannot be comfortable with claims that the US is for white people--period.

    At the same time, I am honestly concerned where things are headed if whites become a minority, especially given some of the rhetoric of those who cheer on that supposed inevitability. It's also true that, by and large, our institutions are western European, heavily indebted to England and Germany, and rooted in a Protestant heritage. I think it's fair to want immigrants who are likely to share the political values our (admittedly, extremely imperfect) institutions are based upon.

    Imagine the scenario of wandering tribes who enforce their “borders” by tribal warfare. Is that better than what the Europeans brought over? I don’t think so.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RudyM

    Imagine the scenario of wandering tribes who enforce their “borders” by tribal warfare. Is that better than what the Europeans brought over? I don’t think so.
     
    Maybe not, but that doesn't negate the injustice of conquest. I think the more important point is that a whole form of life was made it possible with European conquest in what became the United States. Culturally, Native American worldviews and ways of living were not reconcilable with European culture. A Lockean notion of property, for instance, especially with regard to land, can't be reconciled with a communalist approach to it. And it's not obvious to me that Locke is superior on this point. The idea of land property rights is pretty problematic.

    The wars between tribes at least didn't normally result in the same utter disruption that Europeans brought. I think so, anyway. I admit I don't know much about it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. KenH says:

    But that all changed in 1965 when Senator Ted Kennedy and colleagues decided that U.S. immigration had to be opened to the world….

    And some of those unnamed colleagues were Jewish, like Emmanuel Celler and Jacob Javits, and according to some sources the inspiration and guiding force behind the 1965 act which should be renamed the “Demographic Warfare Against the White Race Act” since that has been the obvious result. Whites were 90% of the population in 1965 but are barely 62% today and falling like a rock.

    I don’t know why pundits and writers like Ann Coulter, Pat Buchanan and now Philip Giraldi are afraid to mention the aforementioned Jews and act like Ted Kennedy single handedly passed this destructive piece of legislation. They don’t even need to say the J word, but must still fear being labeled “anti-semitic” and drawing attention to Jewish supporters of the bill both inside and outside the government.

    Read More
    • Agree: Rurik
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  73. Avery says:
    @Brad Smith
    1) Disease killed most of the Native Americans not the White Man. The diseases raced ahead of the White Men so that in most places all they found were empty lands. Furthermore, the various American Indians had no problem at all killing and stealing land from each other. So who do you give it back to? The evil White Man did not Genocide the Natives that is one huge myth. In fact it's very likely that there are more American Indians in America today than when this nation was founded. Yes there were some wars but nobody made an attempt to wipe out all the American Indians that is simply not true.

    2) Who cares how the Evil White Dudes first got here? We came here in various ways and built a great nation with a culture that is envied around the world. It's not something to be ashamed of and the ungrateful assclowns who don't like the nation and culture we built, can go find someplace else to live if they don't like it. You don't need to turn the US into Mexico when there is already a Mexico. If you like that culture go and live their, the same is true for any other place on Earth.

    3) non-sequitur

    4) Is a Straw-man because he never suggested that we want them coming here either.

    Your last point is simply ridiculous. All cultures have problems with violence but not all cultures have a code where murder is acceptable. If you want to live in a place where it is acceptable go live there because we don't want you.

    To put it very bluntly, if you don't want to be an American who shares our common values then you don't belong here. It literally took thousands of years to create Western Culture and we are not going to toss it away for ungrateful people who think so very little of us.

    {…. if you don’t want to be an American….}

    The IslamoFascist ingrate parasite is currently squatting in Christian Canada, taking advantage of Christian Canadian hospitality, sucking up benefits, while proselytizing for Islamist supremacists. The ingrate parasite escaped the s__hole in his native S___tistan (Pakistan) to settle in complete safety and security in Christian Canada.

    The ingrate IslamoFascist parasite is currently scratching out a living shoveling pig s____ in a Canadian-bacon pig farm. He is a certified pig s____ “engineer”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    I have not heard a single "Islamofascist" being executed for treason but their are hundred of Ziofascists who met their Lord Crucifer in hell through different ways.

    Remember your Jewish uncle/aunt Julius and Ethel Rosenberg Avery? How about brother Jonathan Pollard or "slippery" Gross - or how about your grandfather Elie Wiesel who just flew to join his Nazi brothers ....

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/07/07/max-blumenthal-elie-wiesel-was-a-hateful-person/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    I think that strict rules for citizenship are a good idea. I also think that all federal labor laws and regulations should be repealed, which would make it easier for immigrants to find jobs. Why not just have a requirement for no felony record and no deadly transferable disease, plus a $50 or $100 fee, and then you can take what ever private sector job you can find?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Chris Mallory
    Even better, to be employed in the US, you be born of American born parents who were born of American born parents, back to the 7th generation. Everyone else can emigrate to where ever will have them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. @Kiza
    Dear Phil

    Both Trump supporters and Brexit voters have been dismissed by the establishment media as troglodytes, poorly educated ageing “white people” whose complete irrelevancy will be demonstrated when they all die off, taking their bigotry along with them. And may it come soon
     
    I am just wondering how long it may take for the MSM and Establishment followers to help the two groups you mention (it could even be one and the same) get there, that is die. The US may not be too far from another civil war. I hope not.

    This is where you put your finger on the crux of the matter:


    Indeed, immigration into most countries is restricted in various ways and many countries do not permit anyone to become a citizen or legal resident under any circumstances. No one in the U.S. media is complaining about Saudi Arabia or Israel’s strict immigration policies, but the nations that are under fire for not being accessible enough to new waves of essentially third world immigration are those countries that already have fairly open doors, to include Western Europe and the United States.

     

    The only thing that you could have mentioned is that illegal immigration is all about profit, it is the good old private profit at public loss. The connected get the profit, the whole society loses, especially the middle class. But this is always wrapped up in some beautiful images of doing good (pulling emotional strings). This is identical to the US military interventions, that is attacks and destruction of countries wrapped up in R2P, saving some victims and so on.

    Please remember: Paul RINO’s heart just bleeds for more “productive, hardworking” immigrants – I guess not the 60%+ who receive some form of Gov welfare … TWENTY years and more after their naturalizations??!!?

    IMMIGRATION = INVASION

    That’s all there is to it. Migratory imperialism. Demographic warfare. Totalitarian population replacement.

    Not only can no authentic “conservative” ever support mass immigration invasions, neither can any genuine “libertarian”. All mass immigration is is the treasonous handing over of citizenship (ie, in another STATE, something libertarians are supposed to oppose) to unassimilable aliens: aka INVADERS. What is “libertarian” about what Blood Traitor Merkel did to Germany and the EU -forcing the German and other European people to accept mass waves of migratory, Islamic jihadist-settler-colonialist-rapists into their civilized societies?

    It’s time for EVERYONE (that includes YOU, Mr. Unz!) to recognize that the non-Nazi white nationalists were ALWAYS correct. “Diversity” is a disaster for the white peoples of the globe, and mass immigration is a form of elite class war against the historic nation.

    Trump is far too moderate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. helena says:
    @SolontoCroesus
    A few days ago a friend (an immigrant from Japan) asked me to explain "tongue in cheek."

    ---

    It seems to me part of the conversation on immigration that we in the USA must have would emphasize that borders have two sides, and that US government policy makers have respected neither side of its own borders; they have neither controlled who comes into the USA nor controlled themselves from aggressing outside their own borders.

    "Invade the world invite the world" is cute but perhaps does not frame the argument strongly enough. Phil made the case for the rights of the American people to have their government respect their voices and wishes to protect their national culture and sovereignty, and I applaud and endorse his argument.

    In my view, the American people have an equal right and responsibility to demand that their government stop invading other people's lands and undermining their governments, sovereignty and cultures. That's not just a nice thing to do, it's an obligation, one that is, in my view, even more important than the responsibility to insist that our government control migration into USA. It's more important because US acts of invading other countries and destabilizing other states amount to criminal acts of aggression.

    Well said. Many in UK who oppose mass migration also oppose wars in ME – two ‘current affairs’ that it has been taboo to speak about in public.

    Read More
    • Agree: Rurik
    • Replies: @iffen
    Helena,

    Last week I experienced a lesser epiphany. (God, how I love them.)

    When people say something has not been covered in the MSM, what they usually mean is that the MSM didn’t cover it to the extent that they think it should have been or that the coverage was overtly biased. By the same measure, when someone says some event was covered up, what they usually mean is that the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc. investigation or report did not reach the conclusions that they wanted.

    I feel much better now. It was confusing to me because I couldn’t understand how otherwise intelligent people were making statements that were demonstrable incorrect.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. RudyM says:
    @Epaminondas
    Imagine the scenario of wandering tribes who enforce their "borders" by tribal warfare. Is that better than what the Europeans brought over? I don't think so.

    Imagine the scenario of wandering tribes who enforce their “borders” by tribal warfare. Is that better than what the Europeans brought over? I don’t think so.

    Maybe not, but that doesn’t negate the injustice of conquest. I think the more important point is that a whole form of life was made it possible with European conquest in what became the United States. Culturally, Native American worldviews and ways of living were not reconcilable with European culture. A Lockean notion of property, for instance, especially with regard to land, can’t be reconciled with a communalist approach to it. And it’s not obvious to me that Locke is superior on this point. The idea of land property rights is pretty problematic.

    The wars between tribes at least didn’t normally result in the same utter disruption that Europeans brought. I think so, anyway. I admit I don’t know much about it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Salger
    Go spit your White Guilt somewhere else. The noble savage myth is just a myth.
    , @iffen
    the injustice of conquest

    The conquest and displacement of a people by another people is not an injustice.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. RudyM says:
    @Epaminondas
    Try reading this...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation

    Yes, it predates Islam, but was also not stamped out by Islam. Not sure about your point.

    An African-American woman I was friends with a long while back, an old hippie, once said she was glad her ancestors were brought to the U.S. from Africa because if she were back in Africa they’d cut off her clitoris.

    She periodically said things of that sort that scandalized me at the time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. Salger says:
    @RudyM

    Imagine the scenario of wandering tribes who enforce their “borders” by tribal warfare. Is that better than what the Europeans brought over? I don’t think so.
     
    Maybe not, but that doesn't negate the injustice of conquest. I think the more important point is that a whole form of life was made it possible with European conquest in what became the United States. Culturally, Native American worldviews and ways of living were not reconcilable with European culture. A Lockean notion of property, for instance, especially with regard to land, can't be reconciled with a communalist approach to it. And it's not obvious to me that Locke is superior on this point. The idea of land property rights is pretty problematic.

    The wars between tribes at least didn't normally result in the same utter disruption that Europeans brought. I think so, anyway. I admit I don't know much about it.

    Go spit your White Guilt somewhere else. The noble savage myth is just a myth.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. iffen says:
    @helena
    Well said. Many in UK who oppose mass migration also oppose wars in ME - two 'current affairs' that it has been taboo to speak about in public.

    Helena,

    Last week I experienced a lesser epiphany. (God, how I love them.)

    When people say something has not been covered in the MSM, what they usually mean is that the MSM didn’t cover it to the extent that they think it should have been or that the coverage was overtly biased. By the same measure, when someone says some event was covered up, what they usually mean is that the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc. investigation or report did not reach the conclusions that they wanted.

    I feel much better now. It was confusing to me because I couldn’t understand how otherwise intelligent people were making statements that were demonstrable incorrect.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    the MSM didn’t cover it to the extent that they think it should have been
     
    check out Michael Hastings

    or "Syrian gas attack"

    or USS Liberty

    or a thousand other acts of treason and murder, covered up with the absolute and eager complicity of the msm

    what does your 'epiphany' say about them?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    The usual unenforceable White supremacist rubbish to try to force migrants to always do what they are told by Whites.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Salger
    Shouldn't you be covering for migrant criminals?
    , @Rurik

    White supremacist rubbish to try to force migrants to always do what they are told by Whites.
     
    no one is "forcing" them to come

    fool
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. Salger says:
    @Anonymous
    The usual unenforceable White supremacist rubbish to try to force migrants to always do what they are told by Whites.

    Shouldn’t you be covering for migrant criminals?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. @Frank TALKER:
    Something has to give. It’s completely obvious that immigration and multiculturalism are a disaster for America. There’s no way to know what will happen, but events could get ugly, and it’s obvious that many non-whites have bad intentions.

    Some of talk is over the top, but so is what has been done to America. What kind of supremacists should we call the people who are hell-bent on replacing, harming or dispossessing whites? Do you claim that those people don’t exist?

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    Comment 83 was meant for Frank TALKER. Keypad went berserk and I wasn't allowed to edit afterwards.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. iffen says:
    @RudyM

    Imagine the scenario of wandering tribes who enforce their “borders” by tribal warfare. Is that better than what the Europeans brought over? I don’t think so.
     
    Maybe not, but that doesn't negate the injustice of conquest. I think the more important point is that a whole form of life was made it possible with European conquest in what became the United States. Culturally, Native American worldviews and ways of living were not reconcilable with European culture. A Lockean notion of property, for instance, especially with regard to land, can't be reconciled with a communalist approach to it. And it's not obvious to me that Locke is superior on this point. The idea of land property rights is pretty problematic.

    The wars between tribes at least didn't normally result in the same utter disruption that Europeans brought. I think so, anyway. I admit I don't know much about it.

    the injustice of conquest

    The conquest and displacement of a people by another people is not an injustice.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    the injustice of conquest

    The conquest and displacement of a people by another people is not an injustice.
     
    Zionism much?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. most Englishmen are white

    Is this a joke?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  86. @OilcanFloyd
    @Frank TALKER:
    Something has to give. It's completely obvious that immigration and multiculturalism are a disaster for America. There's no way to know what will happen, but events could get ugly, and it's obvious that many non-whites have bad intentions.

    Some of talk is over the top, but so is what has been done to America. What kind of supremacists should we call the people who are hell-bent on replacing, harming or dispossessing whites? Do you claim that those people don't exist?

    Comment 83 was meant for Frank TALKER. Keypad went berserk and I wasn’t allowed to edit afterwards.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Rurik says:
    @Anonymous
    The usual unenforceable White supremacist rubbish to try to force migrants to always do what they are told by Whites.

    White supremacist rubbish to try to force migrants to always do what they are told by Whites.

    no one is “forcing” them to come

    fool

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Rurik says:
    @iffen
    Helena,

    Last week I experienced a lesser epiphany. (God, how I love them.)

    When people say something has not been covered in the MSM, what they usually mean is that the MSM didn’t cover it to the extent that they think it should have been or that the coverage was overtly biased. By the same measure, when someone says some event was covered up, what they usually mean is that the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc. investigation or report did not reach the conclusions that they wanted.

    I feel much better now. It was confusing to me because I couldn’t understand how otherwise intelligent people were making statements that were demonstrable incorrect.

    the MSM didn’t cover it to the extent that they think it should have been

    check out Michael Hastings

    or “Syrian gas attack”

    or USS Liberty

    or a thousand other acts of treason and murder, covered up with the absolute and eager complicity of the msm

    what does your ‘epiphany’ say about them?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. Rurik says:
    @iffen
    the injustice of conquest

    The conquest and displacement of a people by another people is not an injustice.

    the injustice of conquest

    The conquest and displacement of a people by another people is not an injustice.

    Zionism much?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. iffen says:

    Zionists, a group similar to many thousands.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  91. RobinG says:

    “I haven’t heard anyone suggesting that Washington should deport residents who arrived here legally based on race or religion and no one is denying any citizen his or her fundamental liberties.”
    Really Phil? Maybe your definition of “anyone” and “any” is different from mine. Sorry, but I’d rate this article as not one of your best efforts. Normally, I assiduously avoid all such wedge issues, but I’m dismayed there isn’t better critique of the gun debate, so…

    WAS THE DEMOCRATS’ SIT-IN FOR GUN CONTROL A ZIONIST PLOT?

    Well, perhaps not, but the “No Fly, No Buy” proposal, an assault on our Constitutional Rights, plays into an anti-American, pro-Israel agenda. And today, even after [insufficient] criticism from left/liberal/progressives, the Dems. are doubling down on their secret watch-list promotion, and some Repubs. (Susan Collins, et al) are following suit.

    Why is the criticism insufficient? Here is part of the ACLU comment:

    “Our nation’s watchlisting system is error-prone and unreliable because it uses vague and overbroad criteria and secret evidence to place individuals on blacklists without a meaningful process to correct government error and clear their names,”

    Quite true. ACLU goes on in that vein, as do others, but never gets to the point that No Fly, No Buy would set a precedent for denying our Constitutional Rights on the basis of secret evidence produced by the FBI. Gee, what could go wrong there?

    My guess is that anti-gun lobbyists are so eager to curtail gun sales that they don’t care how unfairly they do it. Maybe they don’t understand the meaning of precedent. If you can undermine the 2nd amendment with a secret watchlist, how about the First? You know, Speech, Peaceable Assembly, Petitioning the government, all that good stuff.

    What does this have to do with Zionism? Take a look at the anti-BDS laws being passed in states like NY, courtesy of the Israel Lobby. The pro-BDS activists are fighting such legislation based on (the supposed Right of) Free Speech. Interesting. Now take a look at Canada, where a journalist was recently convicted of a hate-crime for publishing something perceived to be anti-Semitic. Take a look at Europe, where people have been sent to prison for questioning the official Holocaust narrative.

    How many steps do you think there are between anti-BDS laws, and laws proscribing criticism of Israel? How many steps between a secret list denying the purchase of guns, and a secret list denying my internet access for writing this?

    Any change to existing law should be transparent, not some fear-induced secret short-cut through the Bill of Rights.

    Read More
    • Agree: Rurik, Mark Green
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  92. woodNfish says:
    @Durruti
    Rehmat,

    Nice response to Giraldi.

    "I. The White majority in the US like Australia and New Zealand is descendants of White invading immigrants who like the present-day Israeli Jews, applied ethnic-cleansing of tens of millions natives to establish the present-day White majority." Need more be said?

    Your description of American political culture is more accurate than those who are attempting to support the 2016 Electoral Circus, by handicapping for one of the Twin Political Gangs, by supporting one of the puppet candidates, as Giraldi does here:

    "Both Trump supporters and Brexit voters have been dismissed by the establishment media as troglodytes, poorly educated ageing “white people” whose complete irrelevancy will be demonstrated when they all die off, taking their bigotry along with them."

    Therefore Casino Trump must not be dismissed, but is the superior of the official candidates, (as Giraldi, cleverly pimps for Casino Owner Trump).

    A Democratic Republic knows no Racial, Cultural, or Religious distinctions. As ML King said, We are all members of one Race, the Human race.

    For the Restoration of our Republic!

    The US us not a democracy. It is a federal republic. And the “Human Race” is not a race, it is a species.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. MMM says:

    Excellent article – but one point needs elaboration/correction: Ted Kennedy did not pass the Immigration Act of 1965:

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/05/ted-kennedy-did-not-pass-the-immigration-act-of-1965/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  94. Great article. But why bring up muh social contract?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  95. Dutch Boy says:

    If anyone can explain to me why a nation of over 300,000,000 million people that cannot educate or employ the people it already has needs immigrants, I’m all ears.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "If anyone can explain to me why a nation of over 300,000,000 million people that cannot educate or employ the people it already has needs immigrants, I’m all ears."

    For those very reasons.

    Blacks are beyond educating and too many American-born are spoiled, so think the elites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. Rehmat says:
    @Salger
    1. You outed yourself as anti-White.

    2. Race is a thing. Contrart to what postmodern Leftoids pretend.

    3. MLK was a plagiarist who supported what was in practice Affirmative Action.

    4. The United States had immigration restricted to Whites of good character.

    “The United States had immigration restricted to Whites of good character.”

    Are you applying that Russian Jew White immigrants were not of “good character”?

    Beware of Abraham Foxman’s dagger you ‘antisemite’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. Rehmat says:
    @Brad Smith
    1) Disease killed most of the Native Americans not the White Man. The diseases raced ahead of the White Men so that in most places all they found were empty lands. Furthermore, the various American Indians had no problem at all killing and stealing land from each other. So who do you give it back to? The evil White Man did not Genocide the Natives that is one huge myth. In fact it's very likely that there are more American Indians in America today than when this nation was founded. Yes there were some wars but nobody made an attempt to wipe out all the American Indians that is simply not true.

    2) Who cares how the Evil White Dudes first got here? We came here in various ways and built a great nation with a culture that is envied around the world. It's not something to be ashamed of and the ungrateful assclowns who don't like the nation and culture we built, can go find someplace else to live if they don't like it. You don't need to turn the US into Mexico when there is already a Mexico. If you like that culture go and live their, the same is true for any other place on Earth.

    3) non-sequitur

    4) Is a Straw-man because he never suggested that we want them coming here either.

    Your last point is simply ridiculous. All cultures have problems with violence but not all cultures have a code where murder is acceptable. If you want to live in a place where it is acceptable go live there because we don't want you.

    To put it very bluntly, if you don't want to be an American who shares our common values then you don't belong here. It literally took thousands of years to create Western Culture and we are not going to toss it away for ungrateful people who think so very little of us.

    So explain Sherlock Homes why Organized Jewry persecute western scholars who claim that most of the Jews died of disease in Nazi camps and were not gassed by Nazis?

    On April 6, 2016, a court in Paris exposed the true face of ‘freedom of speech’ in the Western nations. It fined Jean-Marie Le Pen, the founder and former leader of country’s third largest political party, Front National, 30,000 euros (£24,000) for denying the existence of Nazi gas chambers.

    The judges ordered their verdict to be published in three major newspapers (all owned by Zionist Jews) and said Le Pen must also pay €10,001 in damages to three Jewish charities that brought the case.

    In April 2015, French Jewish Lobby CRIF took him to court for saying the Nazi gas chambers were a ‘detail’ of history.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/04/07/french-leader-fined-for-denying-gas-chambers/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says:
    @Dutch Boy
    If anyone can explain to me why a nation of over 300,000,000 million people that cannot educate or employ the people it already has needs immigrants, I'm all ears.

    “If anyone can explain to me why a nation of over 300,000,000 million people that cannot educate or employ the people it already has needs immigrants, I’m all ears.”

    For those very reasons.

    Blacks are beyond educating and too many American-born are spoiled, so think the elites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. joe webb says:

    Make America White Again. Almost 100 years ago at the time of the great immigration debate that resulted in the 1924 Immigration Act, Senator Vail said that if there was any changing to be done to the US, that the White people of America would do the changing. Nobody else, and certainly not jews and other pointy heads.

    No White people have ever been asked if they want any immigration, much less brown and black immigration. The thing has been linked to Glob-alism and commerce so everybody must be equal to sell them shit, otherwise they will complain. Remember , they have Human Rights…no they do not. They have no right to the bounty of White America or our soil. Back to the shit holes from which you came….build your own country…he he.

    America was a racialist country from the first, and everybody wanted to keep it that way, including Abe Lincoln and every prez on down to about Kennedy. The lunacy took hold after jews wrote the race equality books, the Darwinian social science was driven semi-underground (see Carl Degler’s book on this history: In Search of Human Nature) and jews took over academe led by Franz Boas, a jewish communist from the 1920-s on. Then there was Hitler as well. Jews are the biggest fascists in the West….

    Today, a Specter is Haunting Europe and the US…the specter of Darwinism ( not a jew) and soon a trillion thoroughly pissed off Whites.

    Make America and Europe White Again, and feel safe on the street, sending your kinds to school…walking to school…think of that! Safe. Go for a walk in the evening…led your kids walk to the mall, or the beach, or the park, or the movies…This was the White Reality a half-dentruy ago.

    As a 9 year old I rode the bus all over
    Seattle alone. We kids hitchhiked ditto, out to the beach at Golden Gardens , I was about 7.

    Finally, per Robt. Putnam’s study on Diversity about ten years ago, people can start trusting one-another again if we make America White Again.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  100. Immigration is a local phenomenon that is administered nationally, with typically dysfunctional outcomes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  101. Rehmat says:
    @Wally
    Yep, "Jews Only" for 'Israel'.

    also see:
    Jews in US admit "Israel First"
    http://mondoweiss.net/2016/07/bluntly-firsters-politics/

    Mondoweiss is a closet “Israel First”. It allows criticism of Israel but not the Jews even Israeli Jews. Just read website’s commenting policy.

    As Gilad Atzmon says, “Palestine Solidarity movement is full of such rats.

    I was not surprised when Rabbi Michael Lerner called Gilad Atzmon, ASSHOLE for exposing him a ‘rat’ over delivering a speech at boxer Muhammad Ali’s funeral.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/06/27/rabbi-lerner-calls-gilad-atzmon-asshole/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    [More than 30 dead & 60 wounded in Shi'ite holy site bombing, shooting outside Baghdad – reports]
    https://www.rt.com/news/350031-gunmen-attack-mausoleum-baghdad/

    Any of your uncles, brothers, fathers, grandfathers amongst the terrorist murderers?
    {Reuters news agency cites local security sources as saying that after the blast, several gunmen stormed the site and opened fire on worshipers celebrating the festival of Eid al-Fitr.}
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. Rehmat says:
    @Avery
    {.... if you don’t want to be an American....}

    The IslamoFascist ingrate parasite is currently squatting in Christian Canada, taking advantage of Christian Canadian hospitality, sucking up benefits, while proselytizing for Islamist supremacists. The ingrate parasite escaped the s__hole in his native S___tistan (Pakistan) to settle in complete safety and security in Christian Canada.

    The ingrate IslamoFascist parasite is currently scratching out a living shoveling pig s____ in a Canadian-bacon pig farm. He is a certified pig s____ "engineer".

    I have not heard a single “Islamofascist” being executed for treason but their are hundred of Ziofascists who met their Lord Crucifer in hell through different ways.

    Remember your Jewish uncle/aunt Julius and Ethel Rosenberg Avery? How about brother Jonathan Pollard or “slippery” Gross – or how about your grandfather Elie Wiesel who just flew to join his Nazi brothers ….

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/07/07/max-blumenthal-elie-wiesel-was-a-hateful-person/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {I have not heard a single “Islamofascist” being executed for treason...}

    Have you heard of your fellow Jihadist IslamoFascists murdering Americans?

    2009: Ingrate IslamoFascist Jihadist Nidal Hasan, a U.S. Army major and psychiatrist, son of immigrants who were most generously allowed by Christian America to escape their miserable existence in Islamistan and settle here in US, murders 13 of his colleagues and injures more than 30 others.

    2015: Ingrate IslamoFascist Jihadists Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, parasites living in Christian America, originally from Pakistan, murder 14 people and injure 22.

    2016: Ingrate IslamoFascist Jihadist Omar Mateen, originally from Afghanistan, murders 49 people and wounds at least 53,

    Any of those Jihadist IslamoFascist terrorist murderers related to youse, Mohammad ?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. @jtgw
    There was a time when the US had open borders. Then again, they also allowed the states a lot of power to regulate residence of non-citizens, and citizenship itself was generally restricted to white males "of good character". The need to regulate immigration at the federal level is generally a product of post-Civil War centralization, as well as the distorting effects of welfare in attracting indigents and social undesirables.

    Should the collective be allowed to regulate immigration at all, though? The libertarian in me says no. However, the libertarian in me also recognizes that we don't live in a libertarian system. If we had true free markets and freedom of association, then only those who were invited would immigrate; there would be no need for centralized regulation of immigration. But when natives are forced to associate with immigrants and forced to pay for their residence and sustenance, then it's another matter entirely.

    If we declared a moratorium on immigration, we would exclude all those undesirables. However, we would also exclude the desirables: the entrepreneurs, the talented individuals who increase productivity, generating wealth for everybody. Discerning the desirable from the undesirable is simply not a task that the government is up to. How can the federal bureaucracy really know how many of each kind of immigrant we need? This is something only the market, operating under minimal regulation, can determine. Sadly, very few candidates for office are making a straightforward call for decentralization and deregulation, which is the best answer to this problem.

    Every wave of immigration since 1800 has been bad for Americans and our freedoms. We should have closed the borders in 1800 and spared our nation the hordes of Irish, Germans and other undesirables.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jtgw
    I assume your Irish name is ironic?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Avery says:

    {Remember your Jewish uncle/aunt Julius and Ethel Rosenberg Avery? How about brother Jonathan Pollard or “slippery” Gross – or how about your grandfather Elie Wiesel…}

    The methane gas you have been inhaling all these years in the Canadian pig farm you have been working in, processing pig fertilizer, has destroyed a large proportion of your senile brain cells.

    You are one very confused IslamoFascist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  105. @Anonymous
    I think that strict rules for citizenship are a good idea. I also think that all federal labor laws and regulations should be repealed, which would make it easier for immigrants to find jobs. Why not just have a requirement for no felony record and no deadly transferable disease, plus a $50 or $100 fee, and then you can take what ever private sector job you can find?

    Even better, to be employed in the US, you be born of American born parents who were born of American born parents, back to the 7th generation. Everyone else can emigrate to where ever will have them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. Avery says:
    @Rehmat
    Mondoweiss is a closet "Israel First". It allows criticism of Israel but not the Jews even Israeli Jews. Just read website's commenting policy.

    As Gilad Atzmon says, "Palestine Solidarity movement is full of such rats.

    I was not surprised when Rabbi Michael Lerner called Gilad Atzmon, ASSHOLE for exposing him a 'rat' over delivering a speech at boxer Muhammad Ali's funeral.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/06/27/rabbi-lerner-calls-gilad-atzmon-asshole/

    [More than 30 dead & 60 wounded in Shi'ite holy site bombing, shooting outside Baghdad – reports]

    https://www.rt.com/news/350031-gunmen-attack-mausoleum-baghdad/

    Any of your uncles, brothers, fathers, grandfathers amongst the terrorist murderers?
    {Reuters news agency cites local security sources as saying that after the blast, several gunmen stormed the site and opened fire on worshipers celebrating the festival of Eid al-Fitr.}

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. jtgw says: • Website
    @Chris Mallory
    Every wave of immigration since 1800 has been bad for Americans and our freedoms. We should have closed the borders in 1800 and spared our nation the hordes of Irish, Germans and other undesirables.

    I assume your Irish name is ironic?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. Avery says:
    @Rehmat
    I have not heard a single "Islamofascist" being executed for treason but their are hundred of Ziofascists who met their Lord Crucifer in hell through different ways.

    Remember your Jewish uncle/aunt Julius and Ethel Rosenberg Avery? How about brother Jonathan Pollard or "slippery" Gross - or how about your grandfather Elie Wiesel who just flew to join his Nazi brothers ....

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/07/07/max-blumenthal-elie-wiesel-was-a-hateful-person/

    {I have not heard a single “Islamofascist” being executed for treason…}

    Have you heard of your fellow Jihadist IslamoFascists murdering Americans?

    2009: Ingrate IslamoFascist Jihadist Nidal Hasan, a U.S. Army major and psychiatrist, son of immigrants who were most generously allowed by Christian America to escape their miserable existence in Islamistan and settle here in US, murders 13 of his colleagues and injures more than 30 others.

    2015: Ingrate IslamoFascist Jihadists Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, parasites living in Christian America, originally from Pakistan, murder 14 people and injure 22.

    2016: Ingrate IslamoFascist Jihadist Omar Mateen, originally from Afghanistan, murders 49 people and wounds at least 53,

    Any of those Jihadist IslamoFascist terrorist murderers related to youse, Mohammad ?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. Tommy says:
    @War for Blair Mountain
    The whole point of post-1965 US Immigration Policy is to deprive The Historic Native Born White American Working Class of the very great benefit of a very severe labor scarcity....which is a very high real wage.


    Post-1965 US Immigration is under the control of Greedy Cheating Oligarchs and nonwhite foreign nationals such as the India Policy Group which owns the US Congress. And as a consequence, Greedy Cheating White Oligarchs have been stealing the wealth of The Native Born White American Working Class for over 40 years....and, the Asian Fifth Column has been able to vote for the very rapid race-replacement of The Historic Native Born White American Working Class every 4 years at POTUS time.

    The combination of Greedy Cheating White MEGA-CEO Power and South Asian Race Power is on full-display in the area surrounding Gruman Corp where Donald Trump had his big rally two months ago in the old LEM building. In the summer of 1969, The US put two Alpha Native Born White American Males on the Moon. These two Alpha Native Born White American Males descended down from the Gruman Corp LEM which was designed and built by Native Born White American Male Engineer's and Technicians...all of them WW2...Korea War...and Vietnam War Vets. A few years after the 1969 Moon landing, Greedy Cheating White Male Gruman Corp Execs began race-replacing it's Native Born White American Male Engineering and Technian Workforce with legal immigrants from China....India....and Pakistan. Through family reunification legal immigration....the area surrounding Gruman Corp has been annexed by India. But the Gruman Corp Execs and their Corporate Lawyers did get their multi-million dollar homes in Llyod Neck(Fiddlers Green Area). This is the area of Billy Joel's 1978 hit "Eddy and Brenda"...Happy Days malt-shop Lilly-White.

    I am for 0 nonwhite legal immigrants forever....this is what should have happened in 1965 when the 1965 Immigration Reform Act was passed. The 1965 Immigration Reform Act should be called the "1965 Native Born White American Working Class Extermination Act!!!!".

    America was never meant to be a white-only country. If so, America would never have brought in negro slaves.

    Asians are more economically successful than whites. America should always let in higher-skilled immigrants, who in this case, happen to be Asian.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. Fairly well said, Giraldi, even if you are a delusional “anti-racist” cuck who – I’m guessing – still can’t get over his “oh my poor grandfather” syndrome.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  111. rakewind says:

    What a thoughtful, balanced and objective view of immigration, so much so that one could substitute UK for America/US in the text and aside from historical data germane to the US alone, the picture presented by the author fits to a tee.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.
Pay no mind to the Mossad agent on the line.