The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 James Kirkpatrick Archive
Time for a National Conversation About MSM Incitement of Violence Against Trump, the GOP…And You
TrumpTraitor
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

This was inevitable. As of this writing, Congressman Steve Scalise remains in critical condition after being shot by a fanatically anti-Trump, Bernie Sanders supporting white male.

Needless to say, after the Main Stream Media has spent months screaming Republicans are literal traitors in service to a foreign power and that the President of the United States won office illegitimately in a “hacked election,” it’s not surprising elected officials are going to be attacked by Leftist partisans gaslit into shrieking hysteria.

Consider the New Normal:

What’s really remarkable is that there hasn’t been even more violence.

Yet this actually understates the malevolence of what is occurring. As the irreplaceable Vox Day put it in his classic book SJWs Always Lie, one of the rules of far-Left “Social Justice Warrior” behavior is that “SJWs Always Project.” It’s not just that the Left is encouraging violence while blaming conservatives. It’s that the Left is using this non-existent wave of supposed Right-wing violence to justify a sweeping crackdown on freedom of speech.

Just before Donald Trump’s election, we were told the Republican campaign had unleashed a wave of terror against racial minorities nationwide, including, most spectacularly, the burning of a black church, with the words “Vote Trump” triumphantly plastered on the ruins. This, of course, turned out to be fake.

After Donald Trump became President Trump, we were told of a wave of “hate crimes” nationwide allegedly inspired by the new Chief Executive. This became the rationale for a whole new round of MSM condemnations of the president for allegedly not “speaking up” to denounce the crimes which he, after all, had nothing to do with [Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes Are Spiking In The U.S. Donald Trump Won’t Speak Up, by Carol Kuruvilla, Huffington Post, February 27, 2017].

Of course, many of these “crimes” were either nonexistent or not even crimes as all (such as putting up flyers which Communists find “hateful” or allegedly saying mean words) [Big Spike In ‘Hate Crimes?’ Not So Fast, by Leo Hohmann, WND, November 21, 2016]. Nonetheless, our money-grubbing friends at the Southern Poverty Law Center demanded President Trump “apologize” for allegedly unleashing this supposed spate of nonexistent crimes. [Trump ‘Must Apologize For Unleashing Hate Crimes,’ by Art Moore, WND, November 29, 2016]

This was taken to its most spectacular extreme when there was a wave of “anti-Semitic bomb threats” supposedly made against Jewish community centers nationwide. The MSM screamed Donald Trump was to blame and accused him of not doing enough to combat this dire threat, even after the president actually acknowledged it at the beginning of his first State of the Union [Trump notes anti-Semitic threats and vandalism in speech to Congress, by Ron Kampeas, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, February 28, 2017. However, it then emerged some of the threats had been made by Juan Thompson, a black journalist. And an Israeli-American dual citizen was eventually found to be responsible for the rest.

Yet incredibly, the story didn’t just disappear down the memory hole; the “wave of anti-Semitism” story continued on without any acknowledgement that many of the threats were simply invented out of whole cloth.

For example, in a recent story about anti-Semitic comments at a high school, Vice declared: “So far this year, 150 bomb threats have been leveled at Jewish institutions in North America and several Jewish cemeteries have been vandalized, among other hate-fueled incidents”. [The Disturbing Spike in Anti-Semitism at Northern California Schools, by Max Cherney, May 25, 2017]

Similarly, your tax dollars funded a gushing interview on NPR with Heidi Beirich decrying the “almost 900 hate and bias incidents between the election and 10 days later”—with no mention of the fact that many of the tales being circulated by the MSM are as real as the UVA Rolling Stone Rape Hoax [SPLC Has Seen Rise In Hate Crime, Domestic Terrorism Attacks, NPR, May 27, 2017].

All of this is reminiscent of how the Black Lives Matter movement continued to use the “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” gesture that came out of Ferguson, Missouri, even after it was determined the late Michael Brown attacked Officer Darren Wilson, rather than meekly surrendering as the lying journalists had wanted us to believe.

Even when the lie has been definitively disproven, it still lives on and is referenced by journalists as common wisdom.

Meanwhile, the truth is pathologized. Revealingly, journalists and progressive activists are especially angry at Donald Trump not because of any policy decision he has made, but because he has emboldened normal Americans to speak their minds on issues surrounding race, immigration and Islamic terrorism.

The campaign against Trump and his supporters should be seen, not so much as an effort to drive out a political figure, but to restore the hegemony of the MSM over the Narrative, returning to Establishment journalists the power to determine who does and does not have the right to be heard.

Even figures once useful to the Left, such as Megyn Kelly, are now being savagely attacked by journalists for supposedly “normalizing” alternative media personalities like Alex Jones of Infowars [Advertisers withdrawing from Megyn Kelly’s show due to Alex Jones interview, by Brian Stelter, CNN, June 14, 2017]. Her career is now being targeted.

As shown by the purge of Katie McHugh, Breitbart has been successfully cowed by effort to pressure their advertisers.

Similarly, at least part of journalists’ hostility to Russia isn’t simply ethnic hatred, but by their fear that Russia’s media outlets are competitive threat, more open as they are to alternative points of view than websites and newspapers in the so-called “Free World.”

Aside from wild claims about Russia, the main argument journalists use to attack dissident organizations is accusing them of “hate speech” which leads, inevitably, to “hate crimes.” For example, CNN ran an article bemoaning the rise of “hate crimes,” especially by “mission-offenders [defined as “rare but often lethal hardcore hatemongers”] [who]… visit websites steeped in hate speech” [The four reasons people commit hate crimes, by Daniel Burke, June 12, 2017]. “Many hate-crime offenders believe that society supports their violent prejudices,” author Burke complains. “The Internet, with its hives of hate groups, has fed that feeling, especially with the ascendency of the alt-right during the 2016 presidential election.”

But it’s not the “alt-right” driving violence. It’s the “alt-right” which is having violence inflicted upon it—especially as the MSM’s definition of the “alt-right” is so expansive it includes practically every supporter of the President of the United States.

And if we accept the MSM’s premise that “hate crimes” are increasing because Donald Trump emboldened ordinary Americans to openly state what they consider “hate speech,” then what do we make of today’s violence? Unlike the Alt Right,” Leftist journalists enjoy staggering resources, all but unlimited reach, and the ability to popularize entire Narratives even when there is absolutely no evidence to support their claims.

Thus for months now, they have portrayed the President as a Manchurian Candidate, his supporters as Nazis, and members of his party as collaborators. What’s more, academics and journalists are increasingly blunt about declaring their open racial hatred against whites and telling non-whites that all whites are “racist,” and thus subject to justified violence.

Media-sanctioned hate speech has already led to the murder of European-Americans; now, it has struck down a Congressman. And many journalists and activists don’t even have the decency to keep from celebrating [Left-Wing Twitter Celebrates Shooting Of Rep. Scalise, Grabien News, June 14, 2017].

By their own standards, the Leftist media stands condemned. It is responsible for the violence today, violence it continues to cultivate. And as the situation in this country continues to spiral out of control, it will be the “mainstream,” “moderate” journalists who will bear the most responsibility for the blood that will be shed.

James Kirkpatrick [Email him] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc.

(Republished from VDare.com by permission of author or representative)
 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
    []
  1. Hodgkinson was a Native Born White American Working Class patriot and HERO!!!!….we need MORE heroes like Hodgkinson taking out these cockroaches!!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sam McGowan
    This person needs to be brought to the attention of the Secret Service.
    , @War for Blair Mountain
    I am going to presume that you are the commenter "Cornivus" who is using my handle....

    You little shit......in hindsight...it was predictable and obvious that you are an agent provocateur....yes..all the other commenters on Unz Review view as a liitle worthless shit...
    , @War for Blair Mountain
    UNZ REVIEW MODS


    You will of course remove the comments of the fake "War for Blair Mountain"....which has all the fingerprints of commenter "Cornivus" who has been egging on Unz Review commenters to engage in political violence for the past several months....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/article/time-for-a-national-conversation-about-msm-incitement-of-violence-against-trump-the-gopand-you/#comment-1907126
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. @War for Biair Mountain
    Hodgkinson was a Native Born White American Working Class patriot and HERO!!!!….we need MORE heroes like Hodgkinson taking out these cockroaches!!!

    This person needs to be brought to the attention of the Secret Service.

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    S0mebody else is using my handle on Unz Review....The first commenter the fake War for Blair Mountain is the impostor....I presume that it is Corvinus pretending that he is me...


    For the record:I oppose political assasinations and I ask Unz Review to remove the comments of the person impersonating me....
  3. Henry Ford in 1933 or so ended his campaign against what he saw as the judaisation of the USA when a world wide boycott of Ford cars succeeded.
    Francois de Wendel was of the opinion that Hitler’s great mistake was underestimating the power of international jewry.
    Jean-Noël Jeanneney, ‘Francois de Wendel en République, L’Argent et le Pouvoir 1914-1940, Paris 1976
    Clear is that institutions as AIPAC and AEI want USA world domination.
    Hollings in his 2004 speech stated that Bush jr attacked Iraq to get the jewish vote.
    Therefore a ‘America first’ president is as unwelcome as the America First organisation in the thirties, Charles Lindbergh the hated person, when he accused USA jewry of wanting war.
    Like Ford, Lindbergh lost.
    Kennedy was murdered two weeks after he threatened Israel with not selling them arms any more if they continued developing their atomic bomb.
    The book
    Avner Cohen,’Israel and the Bomb’, New York 1998
    is worth reading just for seeing how much trouble the writer took to confuse the reader about these two weeks.
    So I wonder who will win this time.

    Read More
    • Replies: @imbroglio
    As the Jews were being led out of the Warsaw ghetto at gunpoint to be transported to their fate, one uniformed SS oberstrumbannfuehrer was heard to remark to the other, "See? Living proof of the power of international Jewery."
    , @jacques sheete

    Like Ford, Lindbergh lost.
     
    Lots of others, too. Cynthia McKinney, for one. Larry P. McDonald, who did a Kennedy," for another.
    , @jacques sheete

    Henry Ford in 1933 or so ended his campaign against what he saw as the judaisation of the USA when a world wide boycott of Ford cars succeeded.
     
    People need to be aware of the role one of FDR's key advisers, Sidney Weinberg, of Goldman Sachs played vis a vis Ford Motor Company and how crises are used by a segment of the moneybag crowd to slowly infiltrate businesses and then eventually take control.

    I suspect that another way to bring a company to its knees is to promote agitation by unions. It's illuminating to see who controlled the unions and what happened to union agitation after a company was made non competitive through strikes and the resulting settlements.

    Another very "interesting" situation is how Ezra Merkin, Cerberus Management, (interesting names, those), and Bank Leumi of Israel got involved in GM after it went under. I suspect the government bailed it out not for the benefit of the workers...Christopher Bollyn has written some fine articles dealing with the subject.

    Something else to investigate is who/what controls small arms manufacturing in the USA...

    Add these to the reading list as well. They are short.

    Rupert Murdoch Murdoch, the FOX guy is clean as a whistle, right? We can trust him right?


    It seems that Arnon Milchan is not only a big Hollywood producer but he also traded nuclear triggers with Israel and did a deal with Murdoch for $200 million.

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/09/26/the-hollywood-big-shot-and-israels-nuclear-triggers/
     

    “The Israeli press is picking up Grant Smith’s revelation from FBI documents that Benjamin Netanyahu was part of an Israeli smuggling ring that spirited nuclear triggers out of the U.S. in the 80s and 90s.”

    http://mondoweiss.net/2012/07/netanyahu-implicated-in-nuclear-smuggling-from-u-s-big-story-in-israel.html
     

    , @Che Guava
    Wow! You have some strange interprations of history. 1933 was the year that the Zionist Council, Congress, whatever it is called, declared war on Germany, and demanded a boycott on allt trade with Germany.

    Ford motor vehicles were made in the USA.

    If it was also a definite turning point for Henry Ford (I had always though that was later, and only for the US war effort), you sure throw oil on a fire of conspiracy.

    ... and another thing to check if time allows.

    Even if the Zionists had called for a boycott of Ford products at that time, I can't see how it could have had any effect.

    JK, that is a good article.
    , @Anonymous
    I live near the Los Angeles & California headquarters of the ADL. Their logo is a globe wrapped in an ADL banner

    That logo says it all.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    Stupid arguments spoil the impact and weight any good arguments you may have will carry. It is *really stupid* to connect Kennedy's shooting in Dallas with, if you are right, what Kennedy had conveyed to Israel just 14 days before.

    Don't tell me you can't see why it is stupid!
  4. Agents of Hate follow the Bad Gremlins scenario: Utter the wrong words or feed them after midnight and they burn down churches, vanadalize cemetaries, tag mosques/synagogues, drive cars with nooses hanging out of windows, transform fraternities into meme-exchanging hate clubs, emit microaggressions and generally give SLPC/ADL a hard time.

    This is why uttering the wrong words or feeding after midnight must the utterly controlled, with zero-tolerance policy. With the President already an unmasked Bad Gremlin, victory is not assured.

    And underreporting is a problem:

    Brysk noted that “typically one of the major problems is underreporting. People for a variety of reasons are afraid” to report anti-Semitism at schools, “so that is an enduring problem with this issue.”

    As is the Pyramid of Hate:

    Brysk pointed to the ADL’s “pyramid of hate,” which shows how anti-Semitic and racist activity can build up from relatively small acts to much more serious and violent ones, and cautioned educators against downplaying what might appear to be minor incidents.

    We better upgrade our levels of fear, stress hormones, and hypervigilantism. Don’t just shrug at Bad Gremlinism.

    Read More
  5. Another fake comment intended to discredit a good regular commenter here at Unz.com. This is BIAIR not BLAIR. The real War should own this handle so he can’t be abused.

    Read More
  6. Why isn’t the Republican establishment instead holding hearings on revoking the licenses of the MSM and defunding leftist public broadcasting when there’s enough evidence to convict them of fraud and deceit a thousand times over?

    It should be obvious by now that the Republican establishment is using the Dems and MSM as proxies to neutralize President Trump and express their utter contempt for the rubes who put them in office.

    Since President Trump is a proxy for Americans of European ancestry, we finally see the owners of the MSM and financiers of the Left have literally a homicidal hatred for Americans that’s a replay of that the Bolsheviks had for Russians.

    Read More
  7. @jilles dykstra
    Henry Ford in 1933 or so ended his campaign against what he saw as the judaisation of the USA when a world wide boycott of Ford cars succeeded.
    Francois de Wendel was of the opinion that Hitler's great mistake was underestimating the power of international jewry.
    Jean-Noël Jeanneney, 'Francois de Wendel en République, L'Argent et le Pouvoir 1914-1940, Paris 1976
    Clear is that institutions as AIPAC and AEI want USA world domination.
    Hollings in his 2004 speech stated that Bush jr attacked Iraq to get the jewish vote.
    Therefore a 'America first' president is as unwelcome as the America First organisation in the thirties, Charles Lindbergh the hated person, when he accused USA jewry of wanting war.
    Like Ford, Lindbergh lost.
    Kennedy was murdered two weeks after he threatened Israel with not selling them arms any more if they continued developing their atomic bomb.
    The book
    Avner Cohen,’Israel and the Bomb’, New York 1998
    is worth reading just for seeing how much trouble the writer took to confuse the reader about these two weeks.
    So I wonder who will win this time.

    As the Jews were being led out of the Warsaw ghetto at gunpoint to be transported to their fate, one uniformed SS oberstrumbannfuehrer was heard to remark to the other, “See? Living proof of the power of international Jewery.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Franklin

    As the Jews were being led out of the Warsaw ghetto at gunpoint to be transported to their fate, one uniformed SS oberstrumbannfuehrer was heard to remark to the other, “See? Living proof of the power of international Jewery.”

     

    For a very short time in history, Jewish class supremacy was a big loser against German Aryan supremacy.
    , @Wally
    That's laughable. No such thing was said. No such "fate" occurred.

    "One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one."

    - endorsed by 34 "reputable historians" and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979
     
    "There's no Business Like Shoah Business"

    Only Liars Want Censorship
    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com
    , @jilles dykstra
    What such statements are worth, I never know.
    J.G. Burg, Schuld und Schicksal, Europas Juden zwischen Henkern und Heuchlern, München, 1962
    Burg, nom de plume for Ginsberg, was a Galician jew.
    He attended the Nuremberg trials, and remarked that few people were interested, that the trials were seen as jewish revenge.

    The USA chairman of the Supreme Court called the trials a 'farce', and warned Frankfurter that he did not go there as a judge, but as a jew.
    Bruce Allen Murphy, ‘The Brandeis/Frankfurter Connection, The Secret Political Activities of Two Supreme Court Justices’, New York, 1983
  8. Time for a National Conversation About MSM…

    Time for the author to get a clue. It’s time we quit using the term, “MSM.” Just because garbage is rammed into our faces 24/7 doesn’t mean it should be called “mainstream.”. Who benefits when we use corporate media terms for themselves? Corporate, gangster media is NOT mainstream in any way, shape or form, and to call it that legitimizes it to some degree.

    Presstitute media should never, ever be legitimized and the fact that any author chooses to use their self chosen terms shows how effective the brainwashing is. I, for one, have no use for the thoughts of the brainwashed.

    Sewer media, which is all big media, must be boycotted and ridiculed at every opportunity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sparkon
    Is it really a good idea to grandstand, and lambaste author James Kirkpatrick about this petty issue, as if it overshadows everything else?

    In your mind, apparently, calling a thief a thief somehow legitimizes theft. Is that how it works?

    You are free, of course, to use whatever clever terminology, wicked euphemisms, even hilarious metaphors your creative mind can produce to describe, mock, and ridicule the press and the networks, their talking heads, their hired hands, and all the toxic nonsense they spew, which is the main thing they do, and the main stream they create in the media.

    Like or not, it is what it is. Calling it something else won't change that, and is just getting bogged down in a labels game, which is a snipe hunt, and a distraction.

    If words are not correct, then language will not be in accordance with the truth of things.
    --Grand Master Kong

     

    Word games. These are home turf for the mindbenders and their wordsmiths. Don't be so eager to play their game.
    , @Achmed E. Newman

    Time for the author to get a clue. It’s time we quit using the term, “MSM.”
     
    I've read Mr. Kirkpatrick for a long time, Jack, and he has a clue, trust me. However, your point is well taken. We need to quit letting the cntrl-left control the language. On Peak Stupidity, the term of art is Government Media, though Lyin' Press may be used going forward.

    I like your terms too, though, Jack.

    BTW, garbage is only rammed down the face of those who are too lame to turn off the switch or cancel the cable TV. It's still voluntary for now, except at airports, and semi-voluntary at dentist-office lobbies.
  9. @jilles dykstra
    Henry Ford in 1933 or so ended his campaign against what he saw as the judaisation of the USA when a world wide boycott of Ford cars succeeded.
    Francois de Wendel was of the opinion that Hitler's great mistake was underestimating the power of international jewry.
    Jean-Noël Jeanneney, 'Francois de Wendel en République, L'Argent et le Pouvoir 1914-1940, Paris 1976
    Clear is that institutions as AIPAC and AEI want USA world domination.
    Hollings in his 2004 speech stated that Bush jr attacked Iraq to get the jewish vote.
    Therefore a 'America first' president is as unwelcome as the America First organisation in the thirties, Charles Lindbergh the hated person, when he accused USA jewry of wanting war.
    Like Ford, Lindbergh lost.
    Kennedy was murdered two weeks after he threatened Israel with not selling them arms any more if they continued developing their atomic bomb.
    The book
    Avner Cohen,’Israel and the Bomb’, New York 1998
    is worth reading just for seeing how much trouble the writer took to confuse the reader about these two weeks.
    So I wonder who will win this time.

    Like Ford, Lindbergh lost.

    Lots of others, too. Cynthia McKinney, for one. Larry P. McDonald, who did a Kennedy,” for another.

    Read More
  10. @imbroglio
    As the Jews were being led out of the Warsaw ghetto at gunpoint to be transported to their fate, one uniformed SS oberstrumbannfuehrer was heard to remark to the other, "See? Living proof of the power of international Jewery."

    As the Jews were being led out of the Warsaw ghetto at gunpoint to be transported to their fate, one uniformed SS oberstrumbannfuehrer was heard to remark to the other, “See? Living proof of the power of international Jewery.”

    For a very short time in history, Jewish class supremacy was a big loser against German Aryan supremacy.

    Read More
  11. @jilles dykstra
    Henry Ford in 1933 or so ended his campaign against what he saw as the judaisation of the USA when a world wide boycott of Ford cars succeeded.
    Francois de Wendel was of the opinion that Hitler's great mistake was underestimating the power of international jewry.
    Jean-Noël Jeanneney, 'Francois de Wendel en République, L'Argent et le Pouvoir 1914-1940, Paris 1976
    Clear is that institutions as AIPAC and AEI want USA world domination.
    Hollings in his 2004 speech stated that Bush jr attacked Iraq to get the jewish vote.
    Therefore a 'America first' president is as unwelcome as the America First organisation in the thirties, Charles Lindbergh the hated person, when he accused USA jewry of wanting war.
    Like Ford, Lindbergh lost.
    Kennedy was murdered two weeks after he threatened Israel with not selling them arms any more if they continued developing their atomic bomb.
    The book
    Avner Cohen,’Israel and the Bomb’, New York 1998
    is worth reading just for seeing how much trouble the writer took to confuse the reader about these two weeks.
    So I wonder who will win this time.

    Henry Ford in 1933 or so ended his campaign against what he saw as the judaisation of the USA when a world wide boycott of Ford cars succeeded.

    People need to be aware of the role one of FDR’s key advisers, Sidney Weinberg, of Goldman Sachs played vis a vis Ford Motor Company and how crises are used by a segment of the moneybag crowd to slowly infiltrate businesses and then eventually take control.

    I suspect that another way to bring a company to its knees is to promote agitation by unions. It’s illuminating to see who controlled the unions and what happened to union agitation after a company was made non competitive through strikes and the resulting settlements.

    Another very “interesting” situation is how Ezra Merkin, Cerberus Management, (interesting names, those), and Bank Leumi of Israel got involved in GM after it went under. I suspect the government bailed it out not for the benefit of the workers…Christopher Bollyn has written some fine articles dealing with the subject.

    Something else to investigate is who/what controls small arms manufacturing in the USA…

    Add these to the reading list as well. They are short.

    Rupert Murdoch Murdoch, the FOX guy is clean as a whistle, right? We can trust him right?

    It seems that Arnon Milchan is not only a big Hollywood producer but he also traded nuclear triggers with Israel and did a deal with Murdoch for $200 million.

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/09/26/the-hollywood-big-shot-and-israels-nuclear-triggers/

    “The Israeli press is picking up Grant Smith’s revelation from FBI documents that Benjamin Netanyahu was part of an Israeli smuggling ring that spirited nuclear triggers out of the U.S. in the 80s and 90s.”

    http://mondoweiss.net/2012/07/netanyahu-implicated-in-nuclear-smuggling-from-u-s-big-story-in-israel.html

    Read More
  12. The ‘mainstream’ media is even worse than Trump has said. It is in full sympathy with the worst of the campus Leftists. If it knew it could lose nay business from professing its beliefs, it would sing that it loves black cop murderers and white attempted assassins of Republican congressmen.

    Read More
  13. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    The attacks against Trump are nothing new. Not new at all.

    In decades leading up to the overthrow of the Czarist government in Russia in 1917, numerous articles started appearing in the American and European media detailing frequent pogroms supposedly occurring against Jews in in Russia.

    The American government in Washington, under pressure from Jewish groups, requested that the American embassy in Russia start to investigate the numerous claims of brutality. The embassy started sending out embassy officials to investigate what appeared to be in the American press simply to be one pogrom after another.

    The investigations instead revealed, time after time, that either these supposed pogroms never happened at all or if they did happen, they were far less serious that those portrayed in the media and often involved clashes by the government with radical Jewish left wing or Communist agitators rather than the claimed “innocent Jewish peasants and shop keepers” portrayed in the media. Even the radical and violent agitators who had unsuccessfully attempted the actual overthrow of the Czarist government back on 1905 were often claimed in the western press to be innocent bystanders being picked on by Russian police and army troops simply because they were Jews.

    Like today, the results of these investigations never appeared in the American press and the claims of ongoing pogroms continued being published in the media all the way up to the eventual fall of the Czar and the takeover of the government by the Communists.

    At one point the frequency and luridness of such reports reached such a fever pitch that even American Protestant ministers started joining in demanding sanctions against the Russian government to counter attacks against “our poor, innocent Jewish brothers” .

    Ironically, many of these “innocent Jews” were later to become high officials in the Communist government and ended up directing the actual murder of the now actually defenseless Russian Orthodox clergy..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Why have supremacist Jews have been marketing the '6,000,000' lie since at least 1869?

    http://i1117.photobucket.com/albums/k598/WhiteWolf722/TheSixMillionMyth.jpg
  14. Here are the facts:

    There exist two race-based nations within the borders of The US

    The Democratic Party is the post-1965 highly racialized nonwhite Nation

    The Republican Party=Native Born White American Historic Nation that voted for Trump…

    The Democratic Party harbors open genocidal intent towards THE HISTORIC NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN NATION….

    Donald Trump=con artist who hates THE HISTORIC NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN WORKING CLASS…

    Trump is openly funding…supporting aiding and abetting ISIS in Syria…

    Trump has committed War Crimes in Syria…

    Trump has committed War Crimes in Yemen

    Trump threatens Shia Muslim Iran

    Trump threatens Cuba

    Trump threatens Christian Russia over Crimea…

    Trump orders Miltary Excercises on Christian Russia’s border..

    Trump orders threatening Naval Excercises in the Baltic Sea…

    Trump continues to import highly racialized Chinese…Korean…Sihk….Hindu….Legal Immigrants=HINDU POTUS KAMALA HARRIS’s Democratic Party Voters…

    And as Noam Chomsky has repeatedly pointed out over the past year:White Males are dying off…at an unprecedented epidemic rate….worse than if their was a plague-epidemic…..worse than the Military Deaaths of White Males during WW2…and Chomsky fingered neo-liberal economic policy as the culprit….and he is dead on right about this….

    There isn’t going to be a National Dialogue….

    Native Born White American Males are being genocidally exterminated…by the Democratic Party and Donald Trump….

    There does need to be a dialogue among White Males before it’s too late…

    LET THE ABOVE SINK IN….

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    LOL
    Your hero Hodgekinson did not attack the con artist Trump. He lurked around a suburb of DC until he learned of a gathering of Republican congress critters and staff. He fired randomly at random Republicans.

    You constantly claim the Republican Party is the party of the Native Born American Working Class. Hodgekinson was Native Born American Working Class.
  15. @imbroglio
    As the Jews were being led out of the Warsaw ghetto at gunpoint to be transported to their fate, one uniformed SS oberstrumbannfuehrer was heard to remark to the other, "See? Living proof of the power of international Jewery."

    That’s laughable. No such thing was said. No such “fate” occurred.

    [MORE]

    “One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.”

    - endorsed by 34 “reputable historians” and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979

    “There’s no Business Like Shoah Business”

    Only Liars Want Censorship
    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
  16. Let me introduce the word I-Nazi. The International Socialist, as opposed to the National Socialist. Let us look at the characteristics of Fascism and see where the I-Nazi fits.

    - Demonising an enemy. Yes. The enemy is the traditional American Working class. The Deplorables.

    - Religion and Govt are intertwined. Yes. The religion is Environmentalism.

    - Control of the press. Yes. Only a single Newspaper in America endorsed Trump. The MSM has been carrying out a slow coup against him since his inauguration.

    - Obsession with National Security – Yes. The fear that there are Russians under every bed. Joe McCarthy would have been proud.

    - Uniforms. Yes. Black clad Antifa shock troops.

    - Corporate Power is Protected – Yes. Walls Street owns the Democrats and many Republicans. It shies away from Trump.

    - Glorification fo the Military. Obama attacked bombed six countries at least. Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia.

    The parallels are uncanny.

    Forte

    Read More
  17. @anon
    The attacks against Trump are nothing new. Not new at all.

    In decades leading up to the overthrow of the Czarist government in Russia in 1917, numerous articles started appearing in the American and European media detailing frequent pogroms supposedly occurring against Jews in in Russia.

    The American government in Washington, under pressure from Jewish groups, requested that the American embassy in Russia start to investigate the numerous claims of brutality. The embassy started sending out embassy officials to investigate what appeared to be in the American press simply to be one pogrom after another.

    The investigations instead revealed, time after time, that either these supposed pogroms never happened at all or if they did happen, they were far less serious that those portrayed in the media and often involved clashes by the government with radical Jewish left wing or Communist agitators rather than the claimed "innocent Jewish peasants and shop keepers" portrayed in the media. Even the radical and violent agitators who had unsuccessfully attempted the actual overthrow of the Czarist government back on 1905 were often claimed in the western press to be innocent bystanders being picked on by Russian police and army troops simply because they were Jews.

    Like today, the results of these investigations never appeared in the American press and the claims of ongoing pogroms continued being published in the media all the way up to the eventual fall of the Czar and the takeover of the government by the Communists.

    At one point the frequency and luridness of such reports reached such a fever pitch that even American Protestant ministers started joining in demanding sanctions against the Russian government to counter attacks against "our poor, innocent Jewish brothers" .

    Ironically, many of these "innocent Jews" were later to become high officials in the Communist government and ended up directing the actual murder of the now actually defenseless Russian Orthodox clergy..

    Why have supremacist Jews have been marketing the ’6,000,000′ lie since at least 1869?

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    It is maybe my clumsiness, but I cannot read what was written before say 1940 about six million.
  18. @jacques sheete

    Time for a National Conversation About MSM...
     
    Time for the author to get a clue. It's time we quit using the term, "MSM." Just because garbage is rammed into our faces 24/7 doesn't mean it should be called "mainstream.". Who benefits when we use corporate media terms for themselves? Corporate, gangster media is NOT mainstream in any way, shape or form, and to call it that legitimizes it to some degree.

    Presstitute media should never, ever be legitimized and the fact that any author chooses to use their self chosen terms shows how effective the brainwashing is. I, for one, have no use for the thoughts of the brainwashed.

    Sewer media, which is all big media, must be boycotted and ridiculed at every opportunity.

    Is it really a good idea to grandstand, and lambaste author James Kirkpatrick about this petty issue, as if it overshadows everything else?

    In your mind, apparently, calling a thief a thief somehow legitimizes theft. Is that how it works?

    You are free, of course, to use whatever clever terminology, wicked euphemisms, even hilarious metaphors your creative mind can produce to describe, mock, and ridicule the press and the networks, their talking heads, their hired hands, and all the toxic nonsense they spew, which is the main thing they do, and the main stream they create in the media.

    Like or not, it is what it is. Calling it something else won’t change that, and is just getting bogged down in a labels game, which is a snipe hunt, and a distraction.

    If words are not correct, then language will not be in accordance with the truth of things.
    –Grand Master Kong

    Word games. These are home turf for the mindbenders and their wordsmiths. Don’t be so eager to play their game.

    Read More
  19. @Wally
    Why have supremacist Jews have been marketing the '6,000,000' lie since at least 1869?

    http://i1117.photobucket.com/albums/k598/WhiteWolf722/TheSixMillionMyth.jpg

    It is maybe my clumsiness, but I cannot read what was written before say 1940 about six million.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Simply zoom in by selecting 'View' in the upper left of your screen or see:

    https://6millionfairytale.wordpress.com/more-proof-six-million-is-a-lie/


    ‘Antisemitism’:
    a logical reaction to the thievery, violence, destruction, and hate that is perpetrated and advocated by Jewish supremacists
     
  20. @imbroglio
    As the Jews were being led out of the Warsaw ghetto at gunpoint to be transported to their fate, one uniformed SS oberstrumbannfuehrer was heard to remark to the other, "See? Living proof of the power of international Jewery."

    What such statements are worth, I never know.
    J.G. Burg, Schuld und Schicksal, Europas Juden zwischen Henkern und Heuchlern, München, 1962
    Burg, nom de plume for Ginsberg, was a Galician jew.
    He attended the Nuremberg trials, and remarked that few people were interested, that the trials were seen as jewish revenge.

    The USA chairman of the Supreme Court called the trials a ‘farce’, and warned Frankfurter that he did not go there as a judge, but as a jew.
    Bruce Allen Murphy, ‘The Brandeis/Frankfurter Connection, The Secret Political Activities of Two Supreme Court Justices’, New York, 1983

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    The facts about Nuremberg:

    Recall that at Nuremberg is was stated that 'the court was not bound by technical rules of evidence.'

    The official use of torture in extracting "confessions" from Germans has been confirmed repeatedly.

    - All but two of the Germans [on trial at Nuremberg], in the 139 cases that we investigated, had their testicles kicked in beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators:" 23.1.49, The Sunday Pictorial (quoted in For Those Who Cannot Speak (ref. 27), p.21.The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months..The investigators would put a black hood over the accused's head, punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses. American judge, van Roden

    - Judge van Roden's allegation of torture to gain "confessions" is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred. Congressional Record, appendix v. 95, sec.12, 3/10/49

    - U.S. Congressional Representative, Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin said:
    " The Nuremberg Trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history."
    Congressional Record, appendix, v.95, sec.14, 6/15/49

    - All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was Standard Operating Procedure with American investigators.
    by Judge E. L. van Roden, "American Atrocities in Germany", The Progressive. February 1949, p. 21f.

    - Judge van Roden's allegation of torture to gain "confessions" is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred.
    - Congressional Record, appendix. v. 95,sec.12, 3/10/49

    - "The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to [Bernard] Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: 'Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse.'"(12)
    12.R. Butler, Legions of Death, Hamlyn, (London, 1983), p.237

    - The admission of Bernard Clarke was corroborated by Mr. Ken Jones in 'The Wrexham Leader', October 17, 1986.
    Mr. Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid in Schleswig-Holstein.
    "They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activites during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Hoess in his cell to help break him down for interrogation."
    "We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance," said Mr. Jones.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:

    - There was no legal precedent for this, one official noted, besides which "any court of inquiry into these allegations would be futile".

    - In one complaint lodged at the National Archives, a 27-year-old German journalist being held at this camp said he had spent two years as a prisoner of the Gestapo. And not once, he said, did they treat him as badly as the British.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:
    - "The London Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German officers and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed through the Cage, and more than 1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes. The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of German civilians joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948.
    As the work of the Cage was wound down, the interrogation of prisoners was switched to a number of internment camps in Germany. And there is evidence that the treatment meted out in these places was, if anything, far worse. While many of the papers relating to these interrogation centres remain sealed at the Foreign Office, it is clear that one camp in the British zone became particularly notorious. At least two German prisoners starved to death there, according to a court of inquiry, while others were shot for minor offences.
     
  21. @jacques sheete

    Time for a National Conversation About MSM...
     
    Time for the author to get a clue. It's time we quit using the term, "MSM." Just because garbage is rammed into our faces 24/7 doesn't mean it should be called "mainstream.". Who benefits when we use corporate media terms for themselves? Corporate, gangster media is NOT mainstream in any way, shape or form, and to call it that legitimizes it to some degree.

    Presstitute media should never, ever be legitimized and the fact that any author chooses to use their self chosen terms shows how effective the brainwashing is. I, for one, have no use for the thoughts of the brainwashed.

    Sewer media, which is all big media, must be boycotted and ridiculed at every opportunity.

    Time for the author to get a clue. It’s time we quit using the term, “MSM.”

    I’ve read Mr. Kirkpatrick for a long time, Jack, and he has a clue, trust me. However, your point is well taken. We need to quit letting the cntrl-left control the language. On Peak Stupidity, the term of art is Government Media, though Lyin’ Press may be used going forward.

    I like your terms too, though, Jack.

    BTW, garbage is only rammed down the face of those who are too lame to turn off the switch or cancel the cable TV. It’s still voluntary for now, except at airports, and semi-voluntary at dentist-office lobbies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    My dentist's clinic plays latter-day Disney and Pixar around the clock (working hours).

    Funny thing, the 'Disney' ones are so distorted from the original stories, I can tell they are supposed to be from fairy tales that I've read, from twenty minutes or so of viewing, I can't work out what they are supposed to be based on.
    , @Anonym
    "Legacy media" maybe appropriate. I like "Lugenpresse" myself. Oligopolist media I haven't seen used but perhaps gets to the heart of the problem - too much media ownership in too few, and often foreign hands. It should be illegal for any media to be owned by a foreign entity.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/katevinton/2016/06/01/these-15-billionaires-own-americas-news-media-companies/

    It is a travesty that Carlos Slim owns any part of the NYT. It is highly annoying that a Chinese is on that list, and that goys are the exception rather than the rule there.

    The media are way too powerful to have such concentration of ownership and trust busting ought to be brought to bear on them. Steve Sailer has remarked before why no one seems to have interest in anti-trust anymore since the days of the Microsoft case. I think the answer is that it is too close to home, such that any muck rakers interested in such affairs get stomped on hard.

    Btw glad that Katie McHugh got a mention.

  22. @jilles dykstra
    Henry Ford in 1933 or so ended his campaign against what he saw as the judaisation of the USA when a world wide boycott of Ford cars succeeded.
    Francois de Wendel was of the opinion that Hitler's great mistake was underestimating the power of international jewry.
    Jean-Noël Jeanneney, 'Francois de Wendel en République, L'Argent et le Pouvoir 1914-1940, Paris 1976
    Clear is that institutions as AIPAC and AEI want USA world domination.
    Hollings in his 2004 speech stated that Bush jr attacked Iraq to get the jewish vote.
    Therefore a 'America first' president is as unwelcome as the America First organisation in the thirties, Charles Lindbergh the hated person, when he accused USA jewry of wanting war.
    Like Ford, Lindbergh lost.
    Kennedy was murdered two weeks after he threatened Israel with not selling them arms any more if they continued developing their atomic bomb.
    The book
    Avner Cohen,’Israel and the Bomb’, New York 1998
    is worth reading just for seeing how much trouble the writer took to confuse the reader about these two weeks.
    So I wonder who will win this time.

    Wow! You have some strange interprations of history. 1933 was the year that the Zionist Council, Congress, whatever it is called, declared war on Germany, and demanded a boycott on allt trade with Germany.

    Ford motor vehicles were made in the USA.

    If it was also a definite turning point for Henry Ford (I had always though that was later, and only for the US war effort), you sure throw oil on a fire of conspiracy.

    … and another thing to check if time allows.

    Even if the Zionists had called for a boycott of Ford products at that time, I can’t see how it could have had any effect.

    JK, that is a good article.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Henry Ford Sr., ‘The international Jew, The world’s foremost problem’, 1948, 1995, Boring, Oregon
    ‘Rudolf Hess, Briefe 1908-1933, Herausgegeben von Wolf Rüdiger Hess, Einführung und Kommentaren von Dirk Bavendamm, München 1987.
    Hess corresponded with Henry Ford.
  23. @Achmed E. Newman

    Time for the author to get a clue. It’s time we quit using the term, “MSM.”
     
    I've read Mr. Kirkpatrick for a long time, Jack, and he has a clue, trust me. However, your point is well taken. We need to quit letting the cntrl-left control the language. On Peak Stupidity, the term of art is Government Media, though Lyin' Press may be used going forward.

    I like your terms too, though, Jack.

    BTW, garbage is only rammed down the face of those who are too lame to turn off the switch or cancel the cable TV. It's still voluntary for now, except at airports, and semi-voluntary at dentist-office lobbies.

    My dentist’s clinic plays latter-day Disney and Pixar around the clock (working hours).

    Funny thing, the ‘Disney’ ones are so distorted from the original stories, I can tell they are supposed to be from fairy tales that I’ve read, from twenty minutes or so of viewing, I can’t work out what they are supposed to be based on.

    Read More
  24. Yet incredibly, the story didn’t just disappear down the memory hole; the “wave of anti-Semitism” story continued on without any acknowledgement that many of the threats were simply invented out of whole cloth…

    Even when the lie has been definitively disproven, it still lives on and is referenced by journalists as common wisdom.

    Here is a clip of Dennis Prager on CNN bringing up this exact fact to a panel of the liars. The blatant ignoring of facts by these people is astounding. They begin discussing it at 3:10 of the video.

    Some of my favorite parts of Prager destroying these loons:

    At 4:11 of the video Prager saying “Alright this isn’t a University, you have to let people speak.” Lol

    At 5:34 the fake Conservative voice that CNN uses as a Brainwashing Banshee says: “You shouldn’t bring people like this on. They’re not helping the cause.”

    And at 4:54: “Hundreds of attack threats.”
    “All caused by two people, none of them in the right.”
    “You only cite two cases.”
    “Which are the cause of all the touted threats.”
    “You’re picking two cases, there were hundreds of threats [and therefore your argument is invalid].”
    “…”

    “You gotta be borderline retarded to not see that ignoring the very substance of a very simple objection makes it 100% clear you’re an idiot with no place in doing any intellectual work, Don.”
    - commenter fsmoura

    Read More
  25. And here’s a great video from one of my favorite Youtubers, The Hard Bastard, commenting on an article in the LA Times in which the ADL openly admits that it includes hoaxes in their statistics.

    Read More
  26. Along with “gaslighting” and other manipulation tactics, another that Trump uses so well is the “play-the-victim” mode, an ages old tactic perfected and used to extreme by, well…….. guess.

    The more Trump appears to be “poisecuted” by the media, the Democrats, , Mueller, Congress etc. the more people will rally to his side.

    I can’t think of anyone who likes his policies to date very much, if at all. Most absolutely hate the guy, when judging his actions, not his Twitter comments.

    Selling weapons to Saudi Arabia, Iran’s arch enemy, second only to Israel and the US? I mean, cui bono? Definitely NOT America, or at least Gentile America.

    Nah, if Trump were a real reformer, swatting these media scumbags is as easy as swatting flies. START A WEBSITE or MEDIA CHANNEL OF YOUR OWN, Mr. Trumpowitz. Bypass the bastards altogether. But, we’re getting to know you pretty well, some of us, anyway and we know that’s not your real plan.

    Using Twitter to communicate complex intentions, policy proposals, etc. is like talking with a potato in your mouth. But you know that already, don’t you.

    On the other hand, if your REAL intention is to generate sympathy for yourself while keeping John Q. Public as bamboozled as possible, with regard to who you REALLY are and your REAL plans, well….. Twitter makes perfect sense. One-line barbs are “made for Twitter-TV.”

    Unfortunately for everyone, including you Mr. Trumpowitz, we got it, already.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    His poll numbers are way up & rising. Try again.
  27. Jun. 14, 2012 These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America

    That’s consolidated from *50* companies back in 1983. But the fact that a few companies own everything demonstrates “the illusion of choice,” Frugal Dad says.

    http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6

    Jun 6, 2013 6 Corporations That Control Your Perception

    Abby Martin goes over the 6 corporations that control nearly everything in the mainstream media, and discusses a few of the most famous cases of media censorship with BTS producer, Manuel Rapalo.

    Read More
  28. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Wally
    That's laughable. No such thing was said. No such "fate" occurred.

    "One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one."

    - endorsed by 34 "reputable historians" and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979
     
    "There's no Business Like Shoah Business"

    Only Liars Want Censorship
    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Jews weren’t moved out of the Warsaw Ghetto?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Yes they were, no one said they weren't, so what?

    "Alone the fact that one may not question the Jewish "holocaust" and that Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions—while incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same averredly incontestable ‘holocaust’ occur—gives the game away. It proves that it must be a lie. Why else would one not be allowed to question it? Because it might offend the "survivors"? Because it "dishonors the dead"? Hardly sufficient reason to outlaw discussion. No, because the exposure of this leading lie might precipitate questions about so many other lies and cause the whole ramshackle fabrication to crumble."

    - Gerard Menuhin / Revisionist Jew, son of famous violinist
     

  29. @Achmed E. Newman

    Time for the author to get a clue. It’s time we quit using the term, “MSM.”
     
    I've read Mr. Kirkpatrick for a long time, Jack, and he has a clue, trust me. However, your point is well taken. We need to quit letting the cntrl-left control the language. On Peak Stupidity, the term of art is Government Media, though Lyin' Press may be used going forward.

    I like your terms too, though, Jack.

    BTW, garbage is only rammed down the face of those who are too lame to turn off the switch or cancel the cable TV. It's still voluntary for now, except at airports, and semi-voluntary at dentist-office lobbies.

    “Legacy media” maybe appropriate. I like “Lugenpresse” myself. Oligopolist media I haven’t seen used but perhaps gets to the heart of the problem – too much media ownership in too few, and often foreign hands. It should be illegal for any media to be owned by a foreign entity.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/katevinton/2016/06/01/these-15-billionaires-own-americas-news-media-companies/

    It is a travesty that Carlos Slim owns any part of the NYT. It is highly annoying that a Chinese is on that list, and that goys are the exception rather than the rule there.

    The media are way too powerful to have such concentration of ownership and trust busting ought to be brought to bear on them. Steve Sailer has remarked before why no one seems to have interest in anti-trust anymore since the days of the Microsoft case. I think the answer is that it is too close to home, such that any muck rakers interested in such affairs get stomped on hard.

    Btw glad that Katie McHugh got a mention.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    I think you are confusing the old kinds of cartels and monopolies that the trust busters had in their sights with the problems you see in today's media. The old problem of pricing power and excessive margins and profits simply doesn't exist in the media which no longer even have the advertising "rivers of gold" to support near monopolistic local newspapers, radio and TV. In the case of the media today someone who happens on reason to believe they mightn't have the story right on something that matters to them can explore many different sources at negligible cost.
  30. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @jilles dykstra
    Henry Ford in 1933 or so ended his campaign against what he saw as the judaisation of the USA when a world wide boycott of Ford cars succeeded.
    Francois de Wendel was of the opinion that Hitler's great mistake was underestimating the power of international jewry.
    Jean-Noël Jeanneney, 'Francois de Wendel en République, L'Argent et le Pouvoir 1914-1940, Paris 1976
    Clear is that institutions as AIPAC and AEI want USA world domination.
    Hollings in his 2004 speech stated that Bush jr attacked Iraq to get the jewish vote.
    Therefore a 'America first' president is as unwelcome as the America First organisation in the thirties, Charles Lindbergh the hated person, when he accused USA jewry of wanting war.
    Like Ford, Lindbergh lost.
    Kennedy was murdered two weeks after he threatened Israel with not selling them arms any more if they continued developing their atomic bomb.
    The book
    Avner Cohen,’Israel and the Bomb’, New York 1998
    is worth reading just for seeing how much trouble the writer took to confuse the reader about these two weeks.
    So I wonder who will win this time.

    I live near the Los Angeles & California headquarters of the ADL. Their logo is a globe wrapped in an ADL banner

    That logo says it all.

    Read More
  31. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    The author must be a conservative in that he hasn’t noticed the millions of crimes against Whites committed by blacks in the last 70 years all cheered on and excused by the MSM.
    He should read Amren. But he probably thinks Amren is racist and White supremacist.

    Read More
  32. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @War for Blair Mountain
    Here are the facts:

    There exist two race-based nations within the borders of The US


    The Democratic Party is the post-1965 highly racialized nonwhite Nation


    The Republican Party=Native Born White American Historic Nation that voted for Trump...


    The Democratic Party harbors open genocidal intent towards THE HISTORIC NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN NATION....

    Donald Trump=con artist who hates THE HISTORIC NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN WORKING CLASS...


    Trump is openly funding...supporting aiding and abetting ISIS in Syria...

    Trump has committed War Crimes in Syria...


    Trump has committed War Crimes in Yemen

    Trump threatens Shia Muslim Iran

    Trump threatens Cuba

    Trump threatens Christian Russia over Crimea...

    Trump orders Miltary Excercises on Christian Russia's border..


    Trump orders threatening Naval Excercises in the Baltic Sea...

    Trump continues to import highly racialized Chinese...Korean...Sihk....Hindu....Legal Immigrants=HINDU POTUS KAMALA HARRIS's Democratic Party Voters...

    And as Noam Chomsky has repeatedly pointed out over the past year:White Males are dying off...at an unprecedented epidemic rate....worse than if their was a plague-epidemic.....worse than the Military Deaaths of White Males during WW2...and Chomsky fingered neo-liberal economic policy as the culprit....and he is dead on right about this....

    There isn't going to be a National Dialogue....


    Native Born White American Males are being genocidally exterminated...by the Democratic Party and Donald Trump....


    There does need to be a dialogue among White Males before it's too late...


    LET THE ABOVE SINK IN....

    LOL
    Your hero Hodgekinson did not attack the con artist Trump. He lurked around a suburb of DC until he learned of a gathering of Republican congress critters and staff. He fired randomly at random Republicans.

    You constantly claim the Republican Party is the party of the Native Born American Working Class. Hodgekinson was Native Born American Working Class.

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    I am the real War for Blair Mountain.....you are responding to someone using my handle.....

    I oppose political assasination.....I highly suspect that that Cornivus is impersonating me....Anatoly Karlin take corrective action...remove the comments of the impostor...
    , @War for Blair Mountain
    I never claimed Hodgekins0n was my hero Cornivus(Using my handle....War for Blair Mountain....in the first comment of this thread)...Your comment has all of your textual fingerprints...by inspection of your comments in response to me any threads...
  33. @Anon
    Jews weren't moved out of the Warsaw Ghetto?

    Yes they were, no one said they weren’t, so what?

    “Alone the fact that one may not question the Jewish “holocaust” and that Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions—while incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same averredly incontestable ‘holocaust’ occur—gives the game away. It proves that it must be a lie. Why else would one not be allowed to question it? Because it might offend the “survivors”? Because it “dishonors the dead”? Hardly sufficient reason to outlaw discussion. No, because the exposure of this leading lie might precipitate questions about so many other lies and cause the whole ramshackle fabrication to crumble.”

    - Gerard Menuhin / Revisionist Jew, son of famous violinist

    Read More
  34. @jilles dykstra
    It is maybe my clumsiness, but I cannot read what was written before say 1940 about six million.

    Simply zoom in by selecting ‘View’ in the upper left of your screen or see:

    https://6millionfairytale.wordpress.com/more-proof-six-million-is-a-lie/

    ‘Antisemitism’:
    a logical reaction to the thievery, violence, destruction, and hate that is perpetrated and advocated by Jewish supremacists

    Read More
  35. @jilles dykstra
    What such statements are worth, I never know.
    J.G. Burg, Schuld und Schicksal, Europas Juden zwischen Henkern und Heuchlern, München, 1962
    Burg, nom de plume for Ginsberg, was a Galician jew.
    He attended the Nuremberg trials, and remarked that few people were interested, that the trials were seen as jewish revenge.

    The USA chairman of the Supreme Court called the trials a 'farce', and warned Frankfurter that he did not go there as a judge, but as a jew.
    Bruce Allen Murphy, ‘The Brandeis/Frankfurter Connection, The Secret Political Activities of Two Supreme Court Justices’, New York, 1983

    The facts about Nuremberg:

    [MORE]

    Recall that at Nuremberg is was stated that ‘the court was not bound by technical rules of evidence.’

    The official use of torture in extracting “confessions” from Germans has been confirmed repeatedly.

    - All but two of the Germans [on trial at Nuremberg], in the 139 cases that we investigated, had their testicles kicked in beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators:” 23.1.49, The Sunday Pictorial (quoted in For Those Who Cannot Speak (ref. 27), p.21.The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months..The investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head, punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses. American judge, van Roden

    - Judge van Roden’s allegation of torture to gain “confessions” is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred. Congressional Record, appendix v. 95, sec.12, 3/10/49

    - U.S. Congressional Representative, Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin said:
    ” The Nuremberg Trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history.”
    Congressional Record, appendix, v.95, sec.14, 6/15/49

    - All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was Standard Operating Procedure with American investigators.
    by Judge E. L. van Roden, “American Atrocities in Germany”, The Progressive. February 1949, p. 21f.

    - Judge van Roden’s allegation of torture to gain “confessions” is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred.
    - Congressional Record, appendix. v. 95,sec.12, 3/10/49

    - “The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to [Bernard] Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: ‘Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse.’”(12)
    12.R. Butler, Legions of Death, Hamlyn, (London, 1983), p.237

    - The admission of Bernard Clarke was corroborated by Mr. Ken Jones in ‘The Wrexham Leader’, October 17, 1986.
    Mr. Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid in Schleswig-Holstein.
    “They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activites during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks,” recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Hoess in his cell to help break him down for interrogation.”
    “We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance,” said Mr. Jones.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:

    - There was no legal precedent for this, one official noted, besides which “any court of inquiry into these allegations would be futile”.

    - In one complaint lodged at the National Archives, a 27-year-old German journalist being held at this camp said he had spent two years as a prisoner of the Gestapo. And not once, he said, did they treat him as badly as the British.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:
    - “The London Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German officers and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed through the Cage, and more than 1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes. The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of German civilians joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948.
    As the work of the Cage was wound down, the interrogation of prisoners was switched to a number of internment camps in Germany. And there is evidence that the treatment meted out in these places was, if anything, far worse. While many of the papers relating to these interrogation centres remain sealed at the Foreign Office, it is clear that one camp in the British zone became particularly notorious. At least two German prisoners starved to death there, according to a court of inquiry, while others were shot for minor offences.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    The van Roden quotes have nothing to do with Nuremberg.
  36. Is Trump going to make it to the end of his term in office? Today I think so – yesterday not – tomorrow ????

    Should Trump make it to the end of his term — the answer is a Big Fat YES! Unless Trump is actually guilty of collusion with the Russians – he must not be impeached. If the deep state can bring him down – then it is over for American democracy. It is that important. It is not about Trump per say – it is about all of America’s traditional values, and the beliefs that made it function.

    Nixon was brought down for a minor crime – for the next twenty years, all the left had to say to win arguments was “NIXON.” They will do the same with Trump – “Trump” will be the rallying cry of the Jew led deep state globalist thugs. Populism will be trashed with one word “Trump”.

    Clearly Trump is being obstructed by his gang of opponents. They are not playing fair. He must be given some leeway in fighting back. There can be no “obstruction of justice” for NO crime – period – end of story.

    The Republicans must build a wall of opposition that says, “no way” to impeachment. They must refuse any charge of obstructing justice. The Republicans MUST just say “NO”.

    I oppose Trump’s neocon Saudi moves – he will NEVER break up the big banks or mega Wall Street corporations – his “no inheritance tax” is a giveaway to undeserving wealthy trust fund babies.

    With that said, he is doing some good, in his limited way, he loves America – the deep state hates him with cause – he is hurting their hegemony over our nation.

    Peace — Art

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    Unless Trump is actually guilty of collusion with the Russians...
     
    Art, I'm surprised you even think there may be a scintilla of truth to this.

    Tell you what, I'm willing to wager that nothing, nada, zilch, zero evidence will be produced in the coming months that demonstrates those dastardly Ruskies had interfered with the election.

    All this is just fake news manufactured by the LOW, the Lugenpresse of Weimerica.

  37. @Sam McGowan
    This person needs to be brought to the attention of the Secret Service.

    S0mebody else is using my handle on Unz Review….The first commenter the fake War for Blair Mountain is the impostor….I presume that it is Corvinus pretending that he is me…

    For the record:I oppose political assasinations and I ask Unz Review to remove the comments of the person impersonating me….

    Read More
  38. @Anonymous
    LOL
    Your hero Hodgekinson did not attack the con artist Trump. He lurked around a suburb of DC until he learned of a gathering of Republican congress critters and staff. He fired randomly at random Republicans.

    You constantly claim the Republican Party is the party of the Native Born American Working Class. Hodgekinson was Native Born American Working Class.

    I am the real War for Blair Mountain…..you are responding to someone using my handle…..

    I oppose political assasination…..I highly suspect that that Cornivus is impersonating me….Anatoly Karlin take corrective action…remove the comments of the impostor…

    Read More
  39. I presume the Unz Review Mods already know that the IP address of the first War for Blair Mountain is different from mine…the authentic War for Blair Mountain…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    You presume wrong and are running out of fake excuses for making murderous threats.

    Use a different computer or an anonymizer = different IP no.

    Try again.
  40. @War for Biair Mountain
    Hodgkinson was a Native Born White American Working Class patriot and HERO!!!!….we need MORE heroes like Hodgkinson taking out these cockroaches!!!

    I am going to presume that you are the commenter “Cornivus” who is using my handle….

    You little shit……in hindsight…it was predictable and obvious that you are an agent provocateur….yes..all the other commenters on Unz Review view as a liitle worthless shit…

    Read More
  41. @War for Biair Mountain
    Hodgkinson was a Native Born White American Working Class patriot and HERO!!!!….we need MORE heroes like Hodgkinson taking out these cockroaches!!!

    UNZ REVIEW MODS

    You will of course remove the comments of the fake “War for Blair Mountain”….which has all the fingerprints of commenter “Cornivus” who has been egging on Unz Review commenters to engage in political violence for the past several months….

    Read More
  42. Anon says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    so…some cuck politician got shot? Some cuck politician who sold out america for corporate cash? and this is supposed to be a BAD thing?

    Sorry….not a problem on my end…

    Read More
  43. @Anonymous
    LOL
    Your hero Hodgekinson did not attack the con artist Trump. He lurked around a suburb of DC until he learned of a gathering of Republican congress critters and staff. He fired randomly at random Republicans.

    You constantly claim the Republican Party is the party of the Native Born American Working Class. Hodgekinson was Native Born American Working Class.

    I never claimed Hodgekins0n was my hero Cornivus(Using my handle….War for Blair Mountain….in the first comment of this thread)…Your comment has all of your textual fingerprints…by inspection of your comments in response to me any threads…

    Read More
  44. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Wally
    Yes they were, no one said they weren't, so what?

    "Alone the fact that one may not question the Jewish "holocaust" and that Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions—while incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same averredly incontestable ‘holocaust’ occur—gives the game away. It proves that it must be a lie. Why else would one not be allowed to question it? Because it might offend the "survivors"? Because it "dishonors the dead"? Hardly sufficient reason to outlaw discussion. No, because the exposure of this leading lie might precipitate questions about so many other lies and cause the whole ramshackle fabrication to crumble."

    - Gerard Menuhin / Revisionist Jew, son of famous violinist
     

    So where’d they go?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Zionists like yourself say they went to enormous mass graves.

    We're talking about an alleged '6M Jews & 5M others' ... 11,000,000.
    There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claims of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, or even yhe 35,000 alleged at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.

    also see:
    The illogical canard: 'Where did Jews go' & more
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8272

  45. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Wally
    The facts about Nuremberg:

    Recall that at Nuremberg is was stated that 'the court was not bound by technical rules of evidence.'

    The official use of torture in extracting "confessions" from Germans has been confirmed repeatedly.

    - All but two of the Germans [on trial at Nuremberg], in the 139 cases that we investigated, had their testicles kicked in beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators:" 23.1.49, The Sunday Pictorial (quoted in For Those Who Cannot Speak (ref. 27), p.21.The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months..The investigators would put a black hood over the accused's head, punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses. American judge, van Roden

    - Judge van Roden's allegation of torture to gain "confessions" is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred. Congressional Record, appendix v. 95, sec.12, 3/10/49

    - U.S. Congressional Representative, Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin said:
    " The Nuremberg Trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history."
    Congressional Record, appendix, v.95, sec.14, 6/15/49

    - All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was Standard Operating Procedure with American investigators.
    by Judge E. L. van Roden, "American Atrocities in Germany", The Progressive. February 1949, p. 21f.

    - Judge van Roden's allegation of torture to gain "confessions" is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred.
    - Congressional Record, appendix. v. 95,sec.12, 3/10/49

    - "The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to [Bernard] Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: 'Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse.'"(12)
    12.R. Butler, Legions of Death, Hamlyn, (London, 1983), p.237

    - The admission of Bernard Clarke was corroborated by Mr. Ken Jones in 'The Wrexham Leader', October 17, 1986.
    Mr. Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid in Schleswig-Holstein.
    "They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activites during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Hoess in his cell to help break him down for interrogation."
    "We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance," said Mr. Jones.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:

    - There was no legal precedent for this, one official noted, besides which "any court of inquiry into these allegations would be futile".

    - In one complaint lodged at the National Archives, a 27-year-old German journalist being held at this camp said he had spent two years as a prisoner of the Gestapo. And not once, he said, did they treat him as badly as the British.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:
    - "The London Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German officers and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed through the Cage, and more than 1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes. The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of German civilians joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948.
    As the work of the Cage was wound down, the interrogation of prisoners was switched to a number of internment camps in Germany. And there is evidence that the treatment meted out in these places was, if anything, far worse. While many of the papers relating to these interrogation centres remain sealed at the Foreign Office, it is clear that one camp in the British zone became particularly notorious. At least two German prisoners starved to death there, according to a court of inquiry, while others were shot for minor offences.
     

    The van Roden quotes have nothing to do with Nuremberg.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    You are not telling the truth, but then you are a Zionist, plus you ignored the other quotes & citations. Such as:

    Recall that at Nuremberg is was stated that 'the court was not bound by technical rules of evidence.' Ahem.

    The official use of torture in extracting "confessions" from Germans has been confirmed repeatedly.
    - U.S. Congressional Representative, Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin said:
    " The Nuremberg Trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history."
    Congressional Record, appendix, v.95, sec.14, 6/15/49

    - "The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to [Bernard] Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: 'Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse.'"(12)
    12.R. Butler, Legions of Death, Hamlyn, (London, 1983), p.237

    - The admission of Bernard Clarke was corroborated by Mr. Ken Jones in 'The Wrexham Leader', October 17, 1986.
    Mr. Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid in Schleswig-Holstein.
    "They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activites during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Hoess in his cell to help break him down for interrogation."
    "We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance," said Mr. Jones.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:

    - There was no legal precedent for this, one official noted, besides which "any court of inquiry into these allegations would be futile".

    - In one complaint lodged at the National Archives, a 27-year-old German journalist being held at this camp said he had spent two years as a prisoner of the Gestapo. And not once, he said, did they treat him as badly as the British.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:
    - "The London Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German officers and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed through the Cage, and more than 1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes. The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of German civilians joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948.
    As the work of the Cage was wound down, the interrogation of prisoners was switched to a number of internment camps in Germany. And there is evidence that the treatment meted out in these places was, if anything, far worse. While many of the papers relating to these interrogation centres remain sealed at the Foreign Office, it is clear that one camp in the British zone became particularly notorious. At least two German prisoners starved to death there, according to a court of inquiry, while others were shot for minor offences.
     
  46. @Art
    Is Trump going to make it to the end of his term in office? Today I think so – yesterday not – tomorrow ????

    Should Trump make it to the end of his term --- the answer is a Big Fat YES! Unless Trump is actually guilty of collusion with the Russians – he must not be impeached. If the deep state can bring him down – then it is over for American democracy. It is that important. It is not about Trump per say – it is about all of America’s traditional values, and the beliefs that made it function.

    Nixon was brought down for a minor crime – for the next twenty years, all the left had to say to win arguments was “NIXON.” They will do the same with Trump – “Trump” will be the rallying cry of the Jew led deep state globalist thugs. Populism will be trashed with one word “Trump”.

    Clearly Trump is being obstructed by his gang of opponents. They are not playing fair. He must be given some leeway in fighting back. There can be no “obstruction of justice” for NO crime – period – end of story.

    The Republicans must build a wall of opposition that says, “no way” to impeachment. They must refuse any charge of obstructing justice. The Republicans MUST just say “NO”.

    I oppose Trump’s neocon Saudi moves – he will NEVER break up the big banks or mega Wall Street corporations – his “no inheritance tax” is a giveaway to undeserving wealthy trust fund babies.

    With that said, he is doing some good, in his limited way, he loves America – the deep state hates him with cause – he is hurting their hegemony over our nation.

    Peace --- Art

    Unless Trump is actually guilty of collusion with the Russians…

    Art, I’m surprised you even think there may be a scintilla of truth to this.

    Tell you what, I’m willing to wager that nothing, nada, zilch, zero evidence will be produced in the coming months that demonstrates those dastardly Ruskies had interfered with the election.

    All this is just fake news manufactured by the LOW, the Lugenpresse of Weimerica.

    Read More
    • Agree: chris
    • Replies: @Art

    Unless Trump is actually guilty of collusion with the Russians…

    Art, I’m surprised you even think there may be a scintilla of truth to this.
     
    Hi geokat62,

    Of course – you are 100% correct – I do not think that Trump did anything traitorous.

    My intent was to draw a line between the whole cloth of a crime and Trump’s attempts to fight the injustice being done by the deep state cabal. To be fair, he must be given some slack.

    An aside. I am amazed at the week kneed Republicans – they should all be out there in the media attacking Hillary and the DNC for not protecting their servers from Russian hacking. This whole thing has come about because of their irresponsible actions.

    In truth and reality, 95% of this whole thing should be about the interplay between the Dems and the deep state FBI et al. That is the important cover up. (Again where are the Republicans?)

    Peace --- Art
  47. @Anon
    So where'd they go?

    Zionists like yourself say they went to enormous mass graves.

    We’re talking about an alleged ’6M Jews & 5M others’ … 11,000,000.
    There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claims of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, or even yhe 35,000 alleged at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.

    also see:
    The illogical canard: ‘Where did Jews go’ & more

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8272

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    You say they weren't killed. Fine. Where'd they go then?
  48. @geokat62

    Unless Trump is actually guilty of collusion with the Russians...
     
    Art, I'm surprised you even think there may be a scintilla of truth to this.

    Tell you what, I'm willing to wager that nothing, nada, zilch, zero evidence will be produced in the coming months that demonstrates those dastardly Ruskies had interfered with the election.

    All this is just fake news manufactured by the LOW, the Lugenpresse of Weimerica.

    Unless Trump is actually guilty of collusion with the Russians…

    Art, I’m surprised you even think there may be a scintilla of truth to this.

    Hi geokat62,

    Of course – you are 100% correct – I do not think that Trump did anything traitorous.

    My intent was to draw a line between the whole cloth of a crime and Trump’s attempts to fight the injustice being done by the deep state cabal. To be fair, he must be given some slack.

    An aside. I am amazed at the week kneed Republicans – they should all be out there in the media attacking Hillary and the DNC for not protecting their servers from Russian hacking. This whole thing has come about because of their irresponsible actions.

    In truth and reality, 95% of this whole thing should be about the interplay between the Dems and the deep state FBI et al. That is the important cover up. (Again where are the Republicans?)

    Peace — Art

    Read More
  49. @Anon
    The van Roden quotes have nothing to do with Nuremberg.

    You are not telling the truth, but then you are a Zionist, plus you ignored the other quotes & citations. Such as:

    [MORE]

    Recall that at Nuremberg is was stated that ‘the court was not bound by technical rules of evidence.’ Ahem.

    The official use of torture in extracting “confessions” from Germans has been confirmed repeatedly.
    - U.S. Congressional Representative, Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin said:
    ” The Nuremberg Trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history.”
    Congressional Record, appendix, v.95, sec.14, 6/15/49

    - “The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to [Bernard] Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: ‘Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse.’”(12)
    12.R. Butler, Legions of Death, Hamlyn, (London, 1983), p.237

    - The admission of Bernard Clarke was corroborated by Mr. Ken Jones in ‘The Wrexham Leader’, October 17, 1986.
    Mr. Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid in Schleswig-Holstein.
    “They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activites during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks,” recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Hoess in his cell to help break him down for interrogation.”
    “We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance,” said Mr. Jones.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:

    - There was no legal precedent for this, one official noted, besides which “any court of inquiry into these allegations would be futile”.

    - In one complaint lodged at the National Archives, a 27-year-old German journalist being held at this camp said he had spent two years as a prisoner of the Gestapo. And not once, he said, did they treat him as badly as the British.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:
    - “The London Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German officers and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed through the Cage, and more than 1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes. The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of German civilians joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948.
    As the work of the Cage was wound down, the interrogation of prisoners was switched to a number of internment camps in Germany. And there is evidence that the treatment meted out in these places was, if anything, far worse. While many of the papers relating to these interrogation centres remain sealed at the Foreign Office, it is clear that one camp in the British zone became particularly notorious. At least two German prisoners starved to death there, according to a court of inquiry, while others were shot for minor offences.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Van Roden was commenting on the defendants on the Malmedy, which was not tried at Nuremberg.
  50. @War for Blair Mountain
    I presume the Unz Review Mods already know that the IP address of the first War for Blair Mountain is different from mine...the authentic War for Blair Mountain...

    You presume wrong and are running out of fake excuses for making murderous threats.

    Use a different computer or an anonymizer = different IP no.

    Try again.

    Read More
  51. @War for Blair Mountain
    S0mebody else is using my handle on Unz Review....The first commenter the fake War for Blair Mountain is the impostor....I presume that it is Corvinus pretending that he is me...


    For the record:I oppose political assasinations and I ask Unz Review to remove the comments of the person impersonating me....

    How does that work here?

    Read More
  52. @DaveE
    Along with "gaslighting" and other manipulation tactics, another that Trump uses so well is the "play-the-victim" mode, an ages old tactic perfected and used to extreme by, well........ guess.

    The more Trump appears to be "poisecuted" by the media, the Democrats, , Mueller, Congress etc. the more people will rally to his side.

    I can't think of anyone who likes his policies to date very much, if at all. Most absolutely hate the guy, when judging his actions, not his Twitter comments.

    Selling weapons to Saudi Arabia, Iran's arch enemy, second only to Israel and the US? I mean, cui bono? Definitely NOT America, or at least Gentile America.

    Nah, if Trump were a real reformer, swatting these media scumbags is as easy as swatting flies. START A WEBSITE or MEDIA CHANNEL OF YOUR OWN, Mr. Trumpowitz. Bypass the bastards altogether. But, we're getting to know you pretty well, some of us, anyway and we know that's not your real plan.

    Using Twitter to communicate complex intentions, policy proposals, etc. is like talking with a potato in your mouth. But you know that already, don't you.

    On the other hand, if your REAL intention is to generate sympathy for yourself while keeping John Q. Public as bamboozled as possible, with regard to who you REALLY are and your REAL plans, well..... Twitter makes perfect sense. One-line barbs are "made for Twitter-TV."

    Unfortunately for everyone, including you Mr. Trumpowitz, we got it, already.

    His poll numbers are way up & rising. Try again.

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    You have just revealed yourself as the little insignificant shit who has appropriated my handle....
    , @DaveE
    Try reading my comment. Trump's rating increase means his "play the victim" strategy is working, which is the whole point of the operation.
  53. @Wally
    His poll numbers are way up & rising. Try again.

    You have just revealed yourself as the little insignificant shit who has appropriated my handle….

    Read More
  54. @jilles dykstra
    Henry Ford in 1933 or so ended his campaign against what he saw as the judaisation of the USA when a world wide boycott of Ford cars succeeded.
    Francois de Wendel was of the opinion that Hitler's great mistake was underestimating the power of international jewry.
    Jean-Noël Jeanneney, 'Francois de Wendel en République, L'Argent et le Pouvoir 1914-1940, Paris 1976
    Clear is that institutions as AIPAC and AEI want USA world domination.
    Hollings in his 2004 speech stated that Bush jr attacked Iraq to get the jewish vote.
    Therefore a 'America first' president is as unwelcome as the America First organisation in the thirties, Charles Lindbergh the hated person, when he accused USA jewry of wanting war.
    Like Ford, Lindbergh lost.
    Kennedy was murdered two weeks after he threatened Israel with not selling them arms any more if they continued developing their atomic bomb.
    The book
    Avner Cohen,’Israel and the Bomb’, New York 1998
    is worth reading just for seeing how much trouble the writer took to confuse the reader about these two weeks.
    So I wonder who will win this time.

    Stupid arguments spoil the impact and weight any good arguments you may have will carry. It is *really stupid* to connect Kennedy’s shooting in Dallas with, if you are right, what Kennedy had conveyed to Israel just 14 days before.

    Don’t tell me you can’t see why it is stupid!

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    One can make a long list of accidents, suicides and murders that happened to benefit Israel.
    In none of these cases, except one, there is evidence that Israel did it, or was involved.
    Yet the list is too long to believe in coincidence, an explanation might be that Jahwe interferered.
    There was a website specifying all the murders attributed to Perez.
    Jews murdered Bernadotte, 1948, the one murder in the list without any doubt.
    Hammarskjöld, he was too impartial, in jewish eyes.
    Anna Lyndh was in favor of an economic boycott of Israel by the EU.
    The tradition with asjkenazi jews for political murder goes back to tzarist Russia.
    The Cheka consisted of mainly jews.
    As Solschenytsyn writes 'communists hated Russians'.
    There is no doubt whatsoever that Kennedy threatened Israel with no longer selling or giving them weapons if they continued making the atomic bomb.
    That other enemies of Kennedy were involved, FBI and maffia, maybe also Johnson, sure as hell.
    The Warren Report just was whitewash.
    Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash – the report on the Warren Report’, 1965, 1966, New York
  55. @Anonym
    "Legacy media" maybe appropriate. I like "Lugenpresse" myself. Oligopolist media I haven't seen used but perhaps gets to the heart of the problem - too much media ownership in too few, and often foreign hands. It should be illegal for any media to be owned by a foreign entity.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/katevinton/2016/06/01/these-15-billionaires-own-americas-news-media-companies/

    It is a travesty that Carlos Slim owns any part of the NYT. It is highly annoying that a Chinese is on that list, and that goys are the exception rather than the rule there.

    The media are way too powerful to have such concentration of ownership and trust busting ought to be brought to bear on them. Steve Sailer has remarked before why no one seems to have interest in anti-trust anymore since the days of the Microsoft case. I think the answer is that it is too close to home, such that any muck rakers interested in such affairs get stomped on hard.

    Btw glad that Katie McHugh got a mention.

    I think you are confusing the old kinds of cartels and monopolies that the trust busters had in their sights with the problems you see in today’s media. The old problem of pricing power and excessive margins and profits simply doesn’t exist in the media which no longer even have the advertising “rivers of gold” to support near monopolistic local newspapers, radio and TV. In the case of the media today someone who happens on reason to believe they mightn’t have the story right on something that matters to them can explore many different sources at negligible cost.

    Read More
  56. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Wally
    You are not telling the truth, but then you are a Zionist, plus you ignored the other quotes & citations. Such as:

    Recall that at Nuremberg is was stated that 'the court was not bound by technical rules of evidence.' Ahem.

    The official use of torture in extracting "confessions" from Germans has been confirmed repeatedly.
    - U.S. Congressional Representative, Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin said:
    " The Nuremberg Trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history."
    Congressional Record, appendix, v.95, sec.14, 6/15/49

    - "The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to [Bernard] Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: 'Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse.'"(12)
    12.R. Butler, Legions of Death, Hamlyn, (London, 1983), p.237

    - The admission of Bernard Clarke was corroborated by Mr. Ken Jones in 'The Wrexham Leader', October 17, 1986.
    Mr. Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid in Schleswig-Holstein.
    "They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activites during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Hoess in his cell to help break him down for interrogation."
    "We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance," said Mr. Jones.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:

    - There was no legal precedent for this, one official noted, besides which "any court of inquiry into these allegations would be futile".

    - In one complaint lodged at the National Archives, a 27-year-old German journalist being held at this camp said he had spent two years as a prisoner of the Gestapo. And not once, he said, did they treat him as badly as the British.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:
    - "The London Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German officers and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed through the Cage, and more than 1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes. The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of German civilians joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948.
    As the work of the Cage was wound down, the interrogation of prisoners was switched to a number of internment camps in Germany. And there is evidence that the treatment meted out in these places was, if anything, far worse. While many of the papers relating to these interrogation centres remain sealed at the Foreign Office, it is clear that one camp in the British zone became particularly notorious. At least two German prisoners starved to death there, according to a court of inquiry, while others were shot for minor offences.
     

    Van Roden was commenting on the defendants on the Malmedy, which was not tried at Nuremberg.

    Read More
  57. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Wally
    Zionists like yourself say they went to enormous mass graves.

    We're talking about an alleged '6M Jews & 5M others' ... 11,000,000.
    There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claims of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, or even yhe 35,000 alleged at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.

    also see:
    The illogical canard: 'Where did Jews go' & more
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8272

    You say they weren’t killed. Fine. Where’d they go then?

    Read More
  58. @Wizard of Oz
    Stupid arguments spoil the impact and weight any good arguments you may have will carry. It is *really stupid* to connect Kennedy's shooting in Dallas with, if you are right, what Kennedy had conveyed to Israel just 14 days before.

    Don't tell me you can't see why it is stupid!

    One can make a long list of accidents, suicides and murders that happened to benefit Israel.
    In none of these cases, except one, there is evidence that Israel did it, or was involved.
    Yet the list is too long to believe in coincidence, an explanation might be that Jahwe interferered.
    There was a website specifying all the murders attributed to Perez.
    Jews murdered Bernadotte, 1948, the one murder in the list without any doubt.
    Hammarskjöld, he was too impartial, in jewish eyes.
    Anna Lyndh was in favor of an economic boycott of Israel by the EU.
    The tradition with asjkenazi jews for political murder goes back to tzarist Russia.
    The Cheka consisted of mainly jews.
    As Solschenytsyn writes ‘communists hated Russians’.
    There is no doubt whatsoever that Kennedy threatened Israel with no longer selling or giving them weapons if they continued making the atomic bomb.
    That other enemies of Kennedy were involved, FBI and maffia, maybe also Johnson, sure as hell.
    The Warren Report just was whitewash.
    Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash – the report on the Warren Report’, 1965, 1966, New York

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    You really don't belong to this. world. Apparently you didn't even understand the very simple point I was making.

    Try thinking "14 days to get up the plot to kill a US Ptesident"

    and try

    "14 days! does the President have to go so quickly? Dò we know for sure what the Vice President will do? Are there short term negotiations or other measures we should try before we effectively declare war on the most powerful country in the worĺd - or is it a matter of desperate urgency?"
    , @Incitatus
    “One can make a long list of accidents, suicides and murders that happened to benefit Israel.”

    Make no mistake. That seems your life's work jilles. Ever get tired of throwing the same old manure? Must be hard to wash off after it back-splatters all over you time after time.

    “Jews murdered Bernadotte, 1948, the one murder in the list without any doubt.”

    Well done jilles. I’d like to know more about Yehoshua Cohen and the rest of the hit team, and why they killed Folke. You seem uninterested. More devoted to unintelligent racism. BTW you don’t mention Lord Moyne, or André Sérot - also murdered “without and doubt” (you can thank me later). Blind hatred affecting your cognition? Failing in hate mongering skills?

    I know. Friends caution me. They say if economists had any brains they’d be ‘entrepreneurs’ who truly understood markets, invested, retired at an early age, and peddled themselves as ‘philanthropists.’ That, and the fact that ‘Economics’ rates only slightly higher than Physical Education on the academic chain has always been cautionary. What a burden for you.

    Even so, I blush at your following comments:

    “There is no doubt whatsoever that Kennedy threatened Israel with no longer selling or giving them weapons if they continued making the atomic bomb.
    That other enemies of Kennedy were involved, FBI and maffia, maybe also Johnson, sure as hell.
    The Warren Report just was whitewash.”

    You were alive in Nov ‘63 jilles? Don’t get me wrong. I love the authoritative source pearls (e.g. Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash’) you incontinently dribble in many posts. Weisberg self-published in ‘65 - how reputable was he?

    How’s Geert Wilders? Any chance you’ll be able to turn tables in the next election? Just imagine how magnificent you’d look in a really keen military uniform - it’ll’be the making of you. Black, no doubt, is your color. Not to worry - a red and white armband, a few ribbons commemorating heroic ghetto-clearing, ‘resettlement’, and the like. What wonderful prospects!

    No doubt you’re practicing the stechscritt (don’t forget supportive undergarments). Naturally beating up immigrants is high on your agenda, but don’t get caught.

    We’re counting on you jilles.

    PS. Say hi to Anders Behring Breivik for us.
  59. @Che Guava
    Wow! You have some strange interprations of history. 1933 was the year that the Zionist Council, Congress, whatever it is called, declared war on Germany, and demanded a boycott on allt trade with Germany.

    Ford motor vehicles were made in the USA.

    If it was also a definite turning point for Henry Ford (I had always though that was later, and only for the US war effort), you sure throw oil on a fire of conspiracy.

    ... and another thing to check if time allows.

    Even if the Zionists had called for a boycott of Ford products at that time, I can't see how it could have had any effect.

    JK, that is a good article.

    Henry Ford Sr., ‘The international Jew, The world’s foremost problem’, 1948, 1995, Boring, Oregon
    ‘Rudolf Hess, Briefe 1908-1933, Herausgegeben von Wolf Rüdiger Hess, Einführung und Kommentaren von Dirk Bavendamm, München 1987.
    Hess corresponded with Henry Ford.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Yes, I am aware of some of Ford's writings and activities outside his being a genius industrialist.

    Don't pretend that he was not in a position to know of what he spoke. He was, he was on and partly paid for a peace ship in WWI, when the Germans were just one among many imperialist powers.

    If there was a dramatic drop in Ford sales by 1933, it may just have been due to a little phenomenon called the Great Depression, n'est pas?

    If you have one serious proof of a boycott of Ford products and it having had an effect, cough it up.
  60. @Wally
    His poll numbers are way up & rising. Try again.

    Try reading my comment. Trump’s rating increase means his “play the victim” strategy is working, which is the whole point of the operation.

    Read More
  61. @jilles dykstra
    One can make a long list of accidents, suicides and murders that happened to benefit Israel.
    In none of these cases, except one, there is evidence that Israel did it, or was involved.
    Yet the list is too long to believe in coincidence, an explanation might be that Jahwe interferered.
    There was a website specifying all the murders attributed to Perez.
    Jews murdered Bernadotte, 1948, the one murder in the list without any doubt.
    Hammarskjöld, he was too impartial, in jewish eyes.
    Anna Lyndh was in favor of an economic boycott of Israel by the EU.
    The tradition with asjkenazi jews for political murder goes back to tzarist Russia.
    The Cheka consisted of mainly jews.
    As Solschenytsyn writes 'communists hated Russians'.
    There is no doubt whatsoever that Kennedy threatened Israel with no longer selling or giving them weapons if they continued making the atomic bomb.
    That other enemies of Kennedy were involved, FBI and maffia, maybe also Johnson, sure as hell.
    The Warren Report just was whitewash.
    Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash – the report on the Warren Report’, 1965, 1966, New York

    You really don’t belong to this. world. Apparently you didn’t even understand the very simple point I was making.

    Try thinking “14 days to get up the plot to kill a US Ptesident”

    and try

    “14 days! does the President have to go so quickly? Dò we know for sure what the Vice President will do? Are there short term negotiations or other measures we should try before we effectively declare war on the most powerful country in the worĺd – or is it a matter of desperate urgency?”

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    It is asserted that Johnson met rabbi's before the murder.
    The Dallas tour in an open car of course was an excellent opportunity.
    What would be the problem to organise it within two weeks, a Harvey Oswald already in position, getting some maffia sharp shooters ?
    And how dclare war, did not Warren do what he was supposed to do, did not have Kennedy enemies galore already, including the FBI and the maffia ?
    Whitewash made minced meat of the Warren story.
  62. @jilles dykstra
    Henry Ford Sr., ‘The international Jew, The world’s foremost problem’, 1948, 1995, Boring, Oregon
    ‘Rudolf Hess, Briefe 1908-1933, Herausgegeben von Wolf Rüdiger Hess, Einführung und Kommentaren von Dirk Bavendamm, München 1987.
    Hess corresponded with Henry Ford.

    Yes, I am aware of some of Ford’s writings and activities outside his being a genius industrialist.

    Don’t pretend that he was not in a position to know of what he spoke. He was, he was on and partly paid for a peace ship in WWI, when the Germans were just one among many imperialist powers.

    If there was a dramatic drop in Ford sales by 1933, it may just have been due to a little phenomenon called the Great Depression, n’est pas?

    If you have one serious proof of a boycott of Ford products and it having had an effect, cough it up.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Would Ford have lied in his own book ?
    Ford had prevented being blackmailed by banks by forcing his dealers to finance him.
    But what could he do against an international boycott ?
  63. @Wizard of Oz
    You really don't belong to this. world. Apparently you didn't even understand the very simple point I was making.

    Try thinking "14 days to get up the plot to kill a US Ptesident"

    and try

    "14 days! does the President have to go so quickly? Dò we know for sure what the Vice President will do? Are there short term negotiations or other measures we should try before we effectively declare war on the most powerful country in the worĺd - or is it a matter of desperate urgency?"

    It is asserted that Johnson met rabbi’s before the murder.
    The Dallas tour in an open car of course was an excellent opportunity.
    What would be the problem to organise it within two weeks, a Harvey Oswald already in position, getting some maffia sharp shooters ?
    And how dclare war, did not Warren do what he was supposed to do, did not have Kennedy enemies galore already, including the FBI and the maffia ?
    Whitewash made minced meat of the Warren story.

    Read More
  64. @Che Guava
    Yes, I am aware of some of Ford's writings and activities outside his being a genius industrialist.

    Don't pretend that he was not in a position to know of what he spoke. He was, he was on and partly paid for a peace ship in WWI, when the Germans were just one among many imperialist powers.

    If there was a dramatic drop in Ford sales by 1933, it may just have been due to a little phenomenon called the Great Depression, n'est pas?

    If you have one serious proof of a boycott of Ford products and it having had an effect, cough it up.

    Would Ford have lied in his own book ?
    Ford had prevented being blackmailed by banks by forcing his dealers to finance him.
    But what could he do against an international boycott ?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Jilles,

    Always thx, even if you are posting rubbish at times.

    I want to reply to Alden's post of the horror of our wartime efforts, I have likely studied that more than anyone else here, and do not want to give excuses, but there are no good excuses for the fire-bombing campaigns and finally atomic bombs here.

    I think the same goes for Germany, Hamburg, Dresden, etc., fire-bombing of Tokyo, many other places.

    Regards, work tomorrow, but I love the shots of our planes hitting and sinking the US ships at the Battle of Okinawa, it is magnificent.

    Close there, cheers is most definitely inappropriate.

    Regards.
  65. Why are we so surprised !!
    Did we forget what the Leftist done so far:

    - – Incite Afro Americans into hating whitey;
    - – Aid & abetted racial hustlers like Rev Al S
    - – Kept Afro Americans as permanent dependents of the state, in order to obtain votes
    - – incited riots (mostly in the form of race riots)
    - – planted bombs in the 60s & 70s against innocents
    - – falsely accused whites of racism
    - – defend violent criminal behavior
    - – prosecute legitimate self defense
    - – block busted thriving urban ethnic neighborhoods with public housing
    - – promoted violent demonstrations
    - – accused all debate with their leftist positions as being illegitimate (attacking free speech)
    - – suppressed the free exchange of ideas in academia
    - – accused working people for being greedy for wanting to withhold taxes from a misspending money junkie government (a govt that believes that it can just unilaterally decide how much money you are allowed to keep – – at what point is the govt not allowed to take your money without your consent?).
    etc etc etc etc

    The leftist will not change their ways… they will delay and obfuscate the issue until they can again gain the political advantage. They will never stop attacking until they get their way. They do not want political compromise; and only ask for it when they are losing or to get the other side to give up something. And it seems we will always tolerate it.

    Especially now, since the Republican alternative is selling the rest of us out, through underemployed, by pushing the free trade (cheap labor) corporatist position. Many of these underemployed masses still believe in the myth of “Democrats are for the working man”, when in actuality they are just the anti white male party.

    Any white male, or mother of a white male, who votes Democrat Party is just cutting their own personal throats. Yet the Democrats make it sound as if you vote, your rational self interest, against them, then you must be a white racist. This is a false dichotomy because voting against someone who is anti white is not synonymous with hating other races (they have nothing to do with each other); and we should not allow the leftist to frame the argument that way.
    When will we ever learn?

    Read More
  66. @jilles dykstra
    One can make a long list of accidents, suicides and murders that happened to benefit Israel.
    In none of these cases, except one, there is evidence that Israel did it, or was involved.
    Yet the list is too long to believe in coincidence, an explanation might be that Jahwe interferered.
    There was a website specifying all the murders attributed to Perez.
    Jews murdered Bernadotte, 1948, the one murder in the list without any doubt.
    Hammarskjöld, he was too impartial, in jewish eyes.
    Anna Lyndh was in favor of an economic boycott of Israel by the EU.
    The tradition with asjkenazi jews for political murder goes back to tzarist Russia.
    The Cheka consisted of mainly jews.
    As Solschenytsyn writes 'communists hated Russians'.
    There is no doubt whatsoever that Kennedy threatened Israel with no longer selling or giving them weapons if they continued making the atomic bomb.
    That other enemies of Kennedy were involved, FBI and maffia, maybe also Johnson, sure as hell.
    The Warren Report just was whitewash.
    Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash – the report on the Warren Report’, 1965, 1966, New York

    “One can make a long list of accidents, suicides and murders that happened to benefit Israel.”

    Make no mistake. That seems your life’s work jilles. Ever get tired of throwing the same old manure? Must be hard to wash off after it back-splatters all over you time after time.

    “Jews murdered Bernadotte, 1948, the one murder in the list without any doubt.”

    Well done jilles. I’d like to know more about Yehoshua Cohen and the rest of the hit team, and why they killed Folke. You seem uninterested. More devoted to unintelligent racism. BTW you don’t mention Lord Moyne, or André Sérot – also murdered “without and doubt” (you can thank me later). Blind hatred affecting your cognition? Failing in hate mongering skills?

    I know. Friends caution me. They say if economists had any brains they’d be ‘entrepreneurs’ who truly understood markets, invested, retired at an early age, and peddled themselves as ‘philanthropists.’ That, and the fact that ‘Economics’ rates only slightly higher than Physical Education on the academic chain has always been cautionary. What a burden for you.

    Even so, I blush at your following comments:

    “There is no doubt whatsoever that Kennedy threatened Israel with no longer selling or giving them weapons if they continued making the atomic bomb.
    That other enemies of Kennedy were involved, FBI and maffia, maybe also Johnson, sure as hell.
    The Warren Report just was whitewash.”

    You were alive in Nov ‘63 jilles? Don’t get me wrong. I love the authoritative source pearls (e.g. Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash’) you incontinently dribble in many posts. Weisberg self-published in ‘65 – how reputable was he?

    How’s Geert Wilders? Any chance you’ll be able to turn tables in the next election? Just imagine how magnificent you’d look in a really keen military uniform – it’ll’be the making of you. Black, no doubt, is your color. Not to worry – a red and white armband, a few ribbons commemorating heroic ghetto-clearing, ‘resettlement’, and the like. What wonderful prospects!

    No doubt you’re practicing the stechscritt (don’t forget supportive undergarments). Naturally beating up immigrants is high on your agenda, but don’t get caught.

    We’re counting on you jilles.

    PS. Say hi to Anders Behring Breivik for us.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    You shouldn't let a poor chap like Jilles make you lose your cool. He is so obviously "on the spectrum" as the jargon has it these days - though clearly he is no Michael Burry if he does deal with markets as you imply.

    After I gave him every chance he still didn't get the problem of Israel's government being so mad that it wouldn't try to find some way other than assassination to deal with the recently arisen (alleged) problem of Kennedy wanting to stop Israel building nuclear weapons. People with his total disconnection from ordinary human emotions and behaviour can read a thousand books but have no feel for the real probabilities which depend on human nature and actual functioning social and political arrangements.
    , @Sparkon

    You were alive in Nov ‘63 jilles? Don’t get me wrong. I love the authoritative source pearls (e.g. Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash’) you incontinently dribble in many posts. Weisberg self-published in ‘65 – how reputable was he?

    No doubt you’re right WoZ...jilles, like jacues/jacques sheete, harbors a conspiracy for every occasion...with obscure references vomited for scholarly patina.
     

    I guess you're making this really silly argument that jilles dykstra is not entitled to study or comment about any historical event unless he was alive when it happened. Prospective students of ancient civilizations should take notice, time travel still being impossible at this late date, and make plans to study only contemporaneous history, if there is such a thing.

    Weisberg, whom you seem to denigrate without justification, was an OSS officer in WWII, and an intelligence analyst for the State Dept., among other official positions, but irrespective of any appeals to his authority, and overlooking that he is known as the dean of JFK assassination researchers, all that matters is the truth and accuracy of what he writes:


    "Following thousands of hours of research in and analysis of the vast, chaotic, deliberately disorganized, padded and largely meaningless 26 volumes ... I establish that the inquiry into the assassination was a whitewash, using as proof only what the Commission avoided, ignored, misrepresented and suppressed of its own evidence."
     
    Whitewash did have a short run in paperback. I bought a copy in '66 or '67, but whether or not it was self-published, or irrespective of whether or not it had a long run, neither issue has any bearing on the primary question of the validity of Weisberg's criticism of the Warren Report, and begs the question: is that all you've got? If so, it ain't much.

    So, it's's an ill-advised attack on Harold Weisberg by Incitatus--poor fire discipline-- but at least sheete and dykstra know they are in very good company to come under attack by the same guy, straight from the horse's mouth, as it were.

    And so for light entertainment, we can enjoy the dog and pony show, note their true colors, and be amused by their antics.

    Back on topic, most of us know the injunction against falsely yelling "fire!" in a crowded theater. The rule also has an allegorical meaning, I suggest, prohibiting the stirring up of human emotions in a way that may cause human harm, chaos, even war.

    James Kirkpatrick is right that the MSM needs to be very careful, and much more restrained, and responsible in the way they present sensational material of questionable veracity.

  67. @Incitatus
    “One can make a long list of accidents, suicides and murders that happened to benefit Israel.”

    Make no mistake. That seems your life's work jilles. Ever get tired of throwing the same old manure? Must be hard to wash off after it back-splatters all over you time after time.

    “Jews murdered Bernadotte, 1948, the one murder in the list without any doubt.”

    Well done jilles. I’d like to know more about Yehoshua Cohen and the rest of the hit team, and why they killed Folke. You seem uninterested. More devoted to unintelligent racism. BTW you don’t mention Lord Moyne, or André Sérot - also murdered “without and doubt” (you can thank me later). Blind hatred affecting your cognition? Failing in hate mongering skills?

    I know. Friends caution me. They say if economists had any brains they’d be ‘entrepreneurs’ who truly understood markets, invested, retired at an early age, and peddled themselves as ‘philanthropists.’ That, and the fact that ‘Economics’ rates only slightly higher than Physical Education on the academic chain has always been cautionary. What a burden for you.

    Even so, I blush at your following comments:

    “There is no doubt whatsoever that Kennedy threatened Israel with no longer selling or giving them weapons if they continued making the atomic bomb.
    That other enemies of Kennedy were involved, FBI and maffia, maybe also Johnson, sure as hell.
    The Warren Report just was whitewash.”

    You were alive in Nov ‘63 jilles? Don’t get me wrong. I love the authoritative source pearls (e.g. Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash’) you incontinently dribble in many posts. Weisberg self-published in ‘65 - how reputable was he?

    How’s Geert Wilders? Any chance you’ll be able to turn tables in the next election? Just imagine how magnificent you’d look in a really keen military uniform - it’ll’be the making of you. Black, no doubt, is your color. Not to worry - a red and white armband, a few ribbons commemorating heroic ghetto-clearing, ‘resettlement’, and the like. What wonderful prospects!

    No doubt you’re practicing the stechscritt (don’t forget supportive undergarments). Naturally beating up immigrants is high on your agenda, but don’t get caught.

    We’re counting on you jilles.

    PS. Say hi to Anders Behring Breivik for us.

    You shouldn’t let a poor chap like Jilles make you lose your cool. He is so obviously “on the spectrum” as the jargon has it these days – though clearly he is no Michael Burry if he does deal with markets as you imply.

    After I gave him every chance he still didn’t get the problem of Israel’s government being so mad that it wouldn’t try to find some way other than assassination to deal with the recently arisen (alleged) problem of Kennedy wanting to stop Israel building nuclear weapons. People with his total disconnection from ordinary human emotions and behaviour can read a thousand books but have no feel for the real probabilities which depend on human nature and actual functioning social and political arrangements.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Incitatus
    No doubt you’re right WoZ.

    jilles, like jacues/jacques sheete, harbors a conspiracy for every occasion. Probably weather too. Most lead inevitably back to Israel and the Jews. Confronted by the simplest questions (e.g. how did FDR get Hitler to invade Poland and later declare war on the US) they’re mute. No clue.

    A tedious journey into very small minds.

    jacues/jacques favorite game is to cut and paste irrelevant classical quotes attempting academic expertise obviously unpossessed. He’s lately progressed to the founding fathers and 1787 antifederalists (those shunning strong central government) claiming:

    “I’d like to add further that I’m sure Adolph Hitler would have agreed with most, if not all, and that’s evidence that he wasn’t the evil that Allied propaganda would have us all believing to this day.”
    -jacues/jacques sheete 14Jun17 #83
    http://www.unz.com/freed/general-lee-speaks-had-it-figured-out/#comment-1904438

    Hitler extinguished German states rights ‘33-34 and instilled a centralized dictatorship. He’d be the last to “agree” with American States Rights. jacues/jacques sheete’s post? No better evidence of total intellectual incomprehension and unfitness exists.

    jilles markets similar nonsense with obscure references vomited for scholarly patina.

    You’re right about some who read but “have no feel for the real probabilities...” I doubt either of these read what they advertise, or comprehend what they read. Bathed in the dull blue light of computer monitors, their reality is equally inhabited by Captain Kirk, Spock, etc.

    If this is the next generation, we seem on the cusp of a new dark age.
  68. @Wizard of Oz
    You shouldn't let a poor chap like Jilles make you lose your cool. He is so obviously "on the spectrum" as the jargon has it these days - though clearly he is no Michael Burry if he does deal with markets as you imply.

    After I gave him every chance he still didn't get the problem of Israel's government being so mad that it wouldn't try to find some way other than assassination to deal with the recently arisen (alleged) problem of Kennedy wanting to stop Israel building nuclear weapons. People with his total disconnection from ordinary human emotions and behaviour can read a thousand books but have no feel for the real probabilities which depend on human nature and actual functioning social and political arrangements.

    No doubt you’re right WoZ.

    jilles, like jacues/jacques sheete, harbors a conspiracy for every occasion. Probably weather too. Most lead inevitably back to Israel and the Jews. Confronted by the simplest questions (e.g. how did FDR get Hitler to invade Poland and later declare war on the US) they’re mute. No clue.

    A tedious journey into very small minds.

    jacues/jacques favorite game is to cut and paste irrelevant classical quotes attempting academic expertise obviously unpossessed. He’s lately progressed to the founding fathers and 1787 antifederalists (those shunning strong central government) claiming:

    “I’d like to add further that I’m sure Adolph Hitler would have agreed with most, if not all, and that’s evidence that he wasn’t the evil that Allied propaganda would have us all believing to this day.”
    -jacues/jacques sheete 14Jun17 #83

    http://www.unz.com/freed/general-lee-speaks-had-it-figured-out/#comment-1904438

    Hitler extinguished German states rights ‘33-34 and instilled a centralized dictatorship. He’d be the last to “agree” with American States Rights. jacues/jacques sheete’s post? No better evidence of total intellectual incomprehension and unfitness exists.

    jilles markets similar nonsense with obscure references vomited for scholarly patina.

    You’re right about some who read but “have no feel for the real probabilities…” I doubt either of these read what they advertise, or comprehend what they read. Bathed in the dull blue light of computer monitors, their reality is equally inhabited by Captain Kirk, Spock, etc.

    If this is the next generation, we seem on the cusp of a new dark age.

    Read More
  69. @Incitatus
    “One can make a long list of accidents, suicides and murders that happened to benefit Israel.”

    Make no mistake. That seems your life's work jilles. Ever get tired of throwing the same old manure? Must be hard to wash off after it back-splatters all over you time after time.

    “Jews murdered Bernadotte, 1948, the one murder in the list without any doubt.”

    Well done jilles. I’d like to know more about Yehoshua Cohen and the rest of the hit team, and why they killed Folke. You seem uninterested. More devoted to unintelligent racism. BTW you don’t mention Lord Moyne, or André Sérot - also murdered “without and doubt” (you can thank me later). Blind hatred affecting your cognition? Failing in hate mongering skills?

    I know. Friends caution me. They say if economists had any brains they’d be ‘entrepreneurs’ who truly understood markets, invested, retired at an early age, and peddled themselves as ‘philanthropists.’ That, and the fact that ‘Economics’ rates only slightly higher than Physical Education on the academic chain has always been cautionary. What a burden for you.

    Even so, I blush at your following comments:

    “There is no doubt whatsoever that Kennedy threatened Israel with no longer selling or giving them weapons if they continued making the atomic bomb.
    That other enemies of Kennedy were involved, FBI and maffia, maybe also Johnson, sure as hell.
    The Warren Report just was whitewash.”

    You were alive in Nov ‘63 jilles? Don’t get me wrong. I love the authoritative source pearls (e.g. Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash’) you incontinently dribble in many posts. Weisberg self-published in ‘65 - how reputable was he?

    How’s Geert Wilders? Any chance you’ll be able to turn tables in the next election? Just imagine how magnificent you’d look in a really keen military uniform - it’ll’be the making of you. Black, no doubt, is your color. Not to worry - a red and white armband, a few ribbons commemorating heroic ghetto-clearing, ‘resettlement’, and the like. What wonderful prospects!

    No doubt you’re practicing the stechscritt (don’t forget supportive undergarments). Naturally beating up immigrants is high on your agenda, but don’t get caught.

    We’re counting on you jilles.

    PS. Say hi to Anders Behring Breivik for us.

    You were alive in Nov ‘63 jilles? Don’t get me wrong. I love the authoritative source pearls (e.g. Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash’) you incontinently dribble in many posts. Weisberg self-published in ‘65 – how reputable was he?

    No doubt you’re right WoZ…jilles, like jacues/jacques sheete, harbors a conspiracy for every occasion…with obscure references vomited for scholarly patina.

    I guess you’re making this really silly argument that jilles dykstra is not entitled to study or comment about any historical event unless he was alive when it happened. Prospective students of ancient civilizations should take notice, time travel still being impossible at this late date, and make plans to study only contemporaneous history, if there is such a thing.

    Weisberg, whom you seem to denigrate without justification, was an OSS officer in WWII, and an intelligence analyst for the State Dept., among other official positions, but irrespective of any appeals to his authority, and overlooking that he is known as the dean of JFK assassination researchers, all that matters is the truth and accuracy of what he writes:

    “Following thousands of hours of research in and analysis of the vast, chaotic, deliberately disorganized, padded and largely meaningless 26 volumes … I establish that the inquiry into the assassination was a whitewash, using as proof only what the Commission avoided, ignored, misrepresented and suppressed of its own evidence.”

    Whitewash did have a short run in paperback. I bought a copy in ’66 or ’67, but whether or not it was self-published, or irrespective of whether or not it had a long run, neither issue has any bearing on the primary question of the validity of Weisberg’s criticism of the Warren Report, and begs the question: is that all you’ve got? If so, it ain’t much.

    So, it’s’s an ill-advised attack on Harold Weisberg by Incitatus–poor fire discipline– but at least sheete and dykstra know they are in very good company to come under attack by the same guy, straight from the horse’s mouth, as it were.

    And so for light entertainment, we can enjoy the dog and pony show, note their true colors, and be amused by their antics.

    Back on topic, most of us know the injunction against falsely yelling “fire!” in a crowded theater. The rule also has an allegorical meaning, I suggest, prohibiting the stirring up of human emotions in a way that may cause human harm, chaos, even war.

    James Kirkpatrick is right that the MSM needs to be very careful, and much more restrained, and responsible in the way they present sensational material of questionable veracity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Incitatus
    “I guess you’re making this really silly argument that jilles dykstra is not entitled to study or comment about any historical event unless he was alive when it happened. Prospective students of ancient civilizations should take notice, time travel still being impossible at this late date, and make plans to study only contemporaneous history, if there is such a thing.”

    You guess incorrectly.

    Think jilles (or jacues/jacques) actually “study” what they “comment about”? They’re way beyond study - posting all manner of nitwit theory as fact. Think nice-guy Hitler would love 1779 states rights arguments? FDR and Churchill started WW2?

    Back to jilles #60. It takes little effort and less expertise to post “One can make a long list of accidents, suicides and murders that happened to benefit Israel...The tradition with asjkenazi jews for political murder goes back to tzarist Russia...Jews murdered Bernadotte...Hammarskjöld, he was too impartial, in jewish eyes...The Cheka consisted of mainly jews...There is no doubt whatsoever that Kennedy threatened Israel with no longer selling or giving them weapons if they continued making the atomic bomb...The Warren Report just was whitewash.” “Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash’” is mentioned as source justification.

    Tell us Sparkon, did ‘Whitewash’ touch all those bases? Did it zero in on Jews and Israel? Did they kill JFK?

    “Weisberg, whom you seem to denigrate without justification...”

    “Denigrate”? I asked “Weisberg self-published in ‘65 – how reputable was he?” Skepticism isn’t denigration. Your “dean of JFK assassination researchers” (school?) or the Wikapedia/book jacket blurb does little to make me a believer. OSS officer? So was Allen Dulles, and I wouldn’t trust him with a dime, let alone true history. I’m no cheerleader for the Warren Commission. Tell us Weisberg’s 22 Nov ‘63 theory (beyond simple cover up). Israel? Jews? Mafia? Castro?

    “Whitewash did have a short run in paperback. I bought a copy in ’66 or ’67, but whether or not it was self-published, or irrespective of whether or not it had a long run, neither issue has any bearing on the primary question of the validity of Weisberg’s criticism of the Warren Report, and begs the question: is that all you’ve got? If so, it ain’t much.”

    You have it backwards. Weisberg’s credibility has everything to do with indicting the record. Tell us his theory and supporting references. Why didn’t he find a publisher? Why isn’t it mainstream? Otherwise, as you might say, ‘you ain’t got much.’

    “James Kirkpatrick is right that the MSM needs to be very careful, and much more restrained, and responsible in the way they present sensational material of questionable veracity.”

    “...sensational material of questionable veracity.” Couldn’t agree more. jilles and jacues/jacques included.
  70. @Sparkon

    You were alive in Nov ‘63 jilles? Don’t get me wrong. I love the authoritative source pearls (e.g. Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash’) you incontinently dribble in many posts. Weisberg self-published in ‘65 – how reputable was he?

    No doubt you’re right WoZ...jilles, like jacues/jacques sheete, harbors a conspiracy for every occasion...with obscure references vomited for scholarly patina.
     

    I guess you're making this really silly argument that jilles dykstra is not entitled to study or comment about any historical event unless he was alive when it happened. Prospective students of ancient civilizations should take notice, time travel still being impossible at this late date, and make plans to study only contemporaneous history, if there is such a thing.

    Weisberg, whom you seem to denigrate without justification, was an OSS officer in WWII, and an intelligence analyst for the State Dept., among other official positions, but irrespective of any appeals to his authority, and overlooking that he is known as the dean of JFK assassination researchers, all that matters is the truth and accuracy of what he writes:


    "Following thousands of hours of research in and analysis of the vast, chaotic, deliberately disorganized, padded and largely meaningless 26 volumes ... I establish that the inquiry into the assassination was a whitewash, using as proof only what the Commission avoided, ignored, misrepresented and suppressed of its own evidence."
     
    Whitewash did have a short run in paperback. I bought a copy in '66 or '67, but whether or not it was self-published, or irrespective of whether or not it had a long run, neither issue has any bearing on the primary question of the validity of Weisberg's criticism of the Warren Report, and begs the question: is that all you've got? If so, it ain't much.

    So, it's's an ill-advised attack on Harold Weisberg by Incitatus--poor fire discipline-- but at least sheete and dykstra know they are in very good company to come under attack by the same guy, straight from the horse's mouth, as it were.

    And so for light entertainment, we can enjoy the dog and pony show, note their true colors, and be amused by their antics.

    Back on topic, most of us know the injunction against falsely yelling "fire!" in a crowded theater. The rule also has an allegorical meaning, I suggest, prohibiting the stirring up of human emotions in a way that may cause human harm, chaos, even war.

    James Kirkpatrick is right that the MSM needs to be very careful, and much more restrained, and responsible in the way they present sensational material of questionable veracity.

    “I guess you’re making this really silly argument that jilles dykstra is not entitled to study or comment about any historical event unless he was alive when it happened. Prospective students of ancient civilizations should take notice, time travel still being impossible at this late date, and make plans to study only contemporaneous history, if there is such a thing.”

    You guess incorrectly.

    Think jilles (or jacues/jacques) actually “study” what they “comment about”? They’re way beyond study – posting all manner of nitwit theory as fact. Think nice-guy Hitler would love 1779 states rights arguments? FDR and Churchill started WW2?

    Back to jilles #60. It takes little effort and less expertise to post “One can make a long list of accidents, suicides and murders that happened to benefit Israel…The tradition with asjkenazi jews for political murder goes back to tzarist Russia…Jews murdered Bernadotte…Hammarskjöld, he was too impartial, in jewish eyes…The Cheka consisted of mainly jews…There is no doubt whatsoever that Kennedy threatened Israel with no longer selling or giving them weapons if they continued making the atomic bomb…The Warren Report just was whitewash.” “Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash’” is mentioned as source justification.

    Tell us Sparkon, did ‘Whitewash’ touch all those bases? Did it zero in on Jews and Israel? Did they kill JFK?

    “Weisberg, whom you seem to denigrate without justification...”

    “Denigrate”? I asked “Weisberg self-published in ‘65 – how reputable was he?” Skepticism isn’t denigration. Your “dean of JFK assassination researchers” (school?) or the Wikapedia/book jacket blurb does little to make me a believer. OSS officer? So was Allen Dulles, and I wouldn’t trust him with a dime, let alone true history. I’m no cheerleader for the Warren Commission. Tell us Weisberg’s 22 Nov ‘63 theory (beyond simple cover up). Israel? Jews? Mafia? Castro?

    “Whitewash did have a short run in paperback. I bought a copy in ’66 or ’67, but whether or not it was self-published, or irrespective of whether or not it had a long run, neither issue has any bearing on the primary question of the validity of Weisberg’s criticism of the Warren Report, and begs the question: is that all you’ve got? If so, it ain’t much.”

    You have it backwards. Weisberg’s credibility has everything to do with indicting the record. Tell us his theory and supporting references. Why didn’t he find a publisher? Why isn’t it mainstream? Otherwise, as you might say, ‘you ain’t got much.’

    “James Kirkpatrick is right that the MSM needs to be very careful, and much more restrained, and responsible in the way they present sensational material of questionable veracity.”

    “…sensational material of questionable veracity.” Couldn’t agree more. jilles and jacues/jacques included.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sparkon

    Tell us his theory
     
    I gave you Weisberg's own words. You may ignore, misunderstand, or misread whatever you choose, but at your own peril.

    For emphasis and good presentation, I used the blockquote tag, but you do seem ignorant of its purpose. Maybe you're just too lazy to be bothered with convention, and good presentation, but always energetic enough, it would seem, to rally to the defense of the usual suspects, however garishly.


    Tell us Sparkon, did ‘Whitewash’ touch all those bases? Did it zero in on Jews and Israel? Did they kill JFK?
     
    My recollection after all these years is that Weisberg in Whitewash doesn't mention the Jews or Israel at all, but maybe you should resign yourself to the clever tactic, but apparently dreaded last resort, of actually reading Whitewash yourself to answer these compulsive questions you have: you know, go all bold and daring into the fringe media where narrow minds never venture, so you wouldn't be so ignorant about Whitewash, and perhaps a tad less hypocritical when you write:

    ...actually “study” what they “comment about”...They’re way beyond study...
     
    Now, you are seemingly trying to drag in all that other stuff, and connect it to Whitewash and Weisberg, apparently as evidence of your own density or ignorance, poor chap, but at least as I see it--he will have to speak for himself--dykstra's cite of Weisberg applies only to Whitewash, which encompasses only Weisberg's critique of the Warren Report--as if it needed explaining, although I acknowledge his presentation is not very good, leaving the door open a crack, I guess, for those eager to mount another fallacious attack on the messengers, which is what you do, and the antics we can enjoy, if for no other reason than education.

    Why isn’t it mainstream?
     
    Such a perplexing question! Gosh, where to start? Mainstream media have the money behind them, and as we know, those with the gold make the rules. The fact that Whitewash may not qualify as mainstream reflects the fact that the moneyboys behind the mainstream do not like it, and refuse to publish it. A rational person may recognize this as the best recommendation of all.

    Similarly, no matter what else one might say or think about Pres. Trump, one overarching fact is that the mainstream media don't like him.

    That alone is good enough for me!

    After all, the mainstream media are the lying sacks of shit we're looking for.

  71. “…Kennedy was murdered two weeks after he threatened Israel with not selling them arms any more if they continued developing their atomic bomb…”

    That was not even close to all of how Kennedy was pissing off the Jews and everyone else.
    1. Kennedy was stopping Israel getting nuclear weapons.
    2. He had fired the top CIA people and was going to fire lots more and reign them in.
    3. He had the mob, possibly, help fix his election then turned around and started busting them. The Jews ran the mob not the Italians.
    4. And the number ONE, big time reason Kennedy was killed. The major point that no one talks about much was he went around the FED and was issuing “silver certificates” through the Treasury department based on USA silver supplies. Completely passing buy the FED and doing what should have been done earlier and should be done now by having the US issue it’s own currency instead of begging Central Banks to do so. Why the last time this was done was Green Backs in the Civil War by Lincoln and he…well damn he was killed too. By a Jew named Booth.

    Read More
  72. @Incitatus
    “I guess you’re making this really silly argument that jilles dykstra is not entitled to study or comment about any historical event unless he was alive when it happened. Prospective students of ancient civilizations should take notice, time travel still being impossible at this late date, and make plans to study only contemporaneous history, if there is such a thing.”

    You guess incorrectly.

    Think jilles (or jacues/jacques) actually “study” what they “comment about”? They’re way beyond study - posting all manner of nitwit theory as fact. Think nice-guy Hitler would love 1779 states rights arguments? FDR and Churchill started WW2?

    Back to jilles #60. It takes little effort and less expertise to post “One can make a long list of accidents, suicides and murders that happened to benefit Israel...The tradition with asjkenazi jews for political murder goes back to tzarist Russia...Jews murdered Bernadotte...Hammarskjöld, he was too impartial, in jewish eyes...The Cheka consisted of mainly jews...There is no doubt whatsoever that Kennedy threatened Israel with no longer selling or giving them weapons if they continued making the atomic bomb...The Warren Report just was whitewash.” “Harold Weisberg, ‘Whitewash’” is mentioned as source justification.

    Tell us Sparkon, did ‘Whitewash’ touch all those bases? Did it zero in on Jews and Israel? Did they kill JFK?

    “Weisberg, whom you seem to denigrate without justification...”

    “Denigrate”? I asked “Weisberg self-published in ‘65 – how reputable was he?” Skepticism isn’t denigration. Your “dean of JFK assassination researchers” (school?) or the Wikapedia/book jacket blurb does little to make me a believer. OSS officer? So was Allen Dulles, and I wouldn’t trust him with a dime, let alone true history. I’m no cheerleader for the Warren Commission. Tell us Weisberg’s 22 Nov ‘63 theory (beyond simple cover up). Israel? Jews? Mafia? Castro?

    “Whitewash did have a short run in paperback. I bought a copy in ’66 or ’67, but whether or not it was self-published, or irrespective of whether or not it had a long run, neither issue has any bearing on the primary question of the validity of Weisberg’s criticism of the Warren Report, and begs the question: is that all you’ve got? If so, it ain’t much.”

    You have it backwards. Weisberg’s credibility has everything to do with indicting the record. Tell us his theory and supporting references. Why didn’t he find a publisher? Why isn’t it mainstream? Otherwise, as you might say, ‘you ain’t got much.’

    “James Kirkpatrick is right that the MSM needs to be very careful, and much more restrained, and responsible in the way they present sensational material of questionable veracity.”

    “...sensational material of questionable veracity.” Couldn’t agree more. jilles and jacues/jacques included.

    Tell us his theory

    I gave you Weisberg’s own words. You may ignore, misunderstand, or misread whatever you choose, but at your own peril.

    For emphasis and good presentation, I used the blockquote tag, but you do seem ignorant of its purpose. Maybe you’re just too lazy to be bothered with convention, and good presentation, but always energetic enough, it would seem, to rally to the defense of the usual suspects, however garishly.

    Tell us Sparkon, did ‘Whitewash’ touch all those bases? Did it zero in on Jews and Israel? Did they kill JFK?

    My recollection after all these years is that Weisberg in Whitewash doesn’t mention the Jews or Israel at all, but maybe you should resign yourself to the clever tactic, but apparently dreaded last resort, of actually reading Whitewash yourself to answer these compulsive questions you have: you know, go all bold and daring into the fringe media where narrow minds never venture, so you wouldn’t be so ignorant about Whitewash, and perhaps a tad less hypocritical when you write:

    …actually “study” what they “comment about”…They’re way beyond study…

    Now, you are seemingly trying to drag in all that other stuff, and connect it to Whitewash and Weisberg, apparently as evidence of your own density or ignorance, poor chap, but at least as I see it–he will have to speak for himself–dykstra’s cite of Weisberg applies only to Whitewash, which encompasses only Weisberg’s critique of the Warren Report–as if it needed explaining, although I acknowledge his presentation is not very good, leaving the door open a crack, I guess, for those eager to mount another fallacious attack on the messengers, which is what you do, and the antics we can enjoy, if for no other reason than education.

    Why isn’t it mainstream?

    Such a perplexing question! Gosh, where to start? Mainstream media have the money behind them, and as we know, those with the gold make the rules. The fact that Whitewash may not qualify as mainstream reflects the fact that the moneyboys behind the mainstream do not like it, and refuse to publish it. A rational person may recognize this as the best recommendation of all.

    Similarly, no matter what else one might say or think about Pres. Trump, one overarching fact is that the mainstream media don’t like him.

    That alone is good enough for me!

    After all, the mainstream media are the lying sacks of shit we’re looking for.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Incitatus
    “Tell us his theory” “I gave you Weisberg’s own words. You may ignore, misunderstand, or misread whatever you choose, but at your own peril.”

    The Wikapedia blurb? “Following thousands of hours of research in and analysis of the vast, chaotic, deliberately disorganized, padded and largely meaningless 26 volumes … I establish that the inquiry into the assassination was a whitewash, using as proof only what the Commission avoided, ignored, misrepresented and suppressed of its own evidence”?

    That’s proof of a coverup? If he spent ‘tens of thousands of hours’ (or said so) would that make him even more credible? You’re not being treated for paranoia are you? Just in case, be assured I’d never willingly ignore Weisberg. Wouldn’t want to put myself in “peril.”

    “My recollection after all these years is that Weisberg in Whitewash doesn’t mention the Jews or Israel at all, but maybe you should resign yourself to the clever tactic...”

    “Tactic” Sparkon? Forget jilles post #60? “One can make a long list of accidents, suicides and murders that happened to benefit Israel...The tradition with asjkenazi jews for political murder goes back to tzarist Russia...Jews murdered Bernadotte...Hammarskjöld, he was too impartial, in jewish eyes...The Cheka consisted of mainly jews...There is no doubt whatsoever that Kennedy threatened Israel with no longer selling or giving them weapons if they continued making the atomic bomb...The Warren Report just was whitewash”?

    “Gosh” as you might say! jilles (your pal) mentions Israel and Jews a lot. Forget? Amazing when you can’t recall Weisburg mentioning “the Jews or Israel at all.” What’s jilles “tactic” Sparkon?

    “Now, you are seemingly trying to drag in all that other stuff, and connect it to Whitewash and Weisberg, apparently as evidence of your own density or ignorance, poor chap...”

    Not at all. “All that other stuff” existed when you (uninvited) defended jilles and paired him with Jacues/Jacques Sheete as sacred “messengers.” You’ve since avoided specific comments on their posts. Your only contribution is Wikapedia, personal invective and blockquote hygiene tips. Simpleton passive-aggressive behavior. With a touch of paranoid inferiority.

    “Similarly, no matter what else one might say or think about Pres. Trump, one overarching fact is that the mainstream media don’t like him...That alone is good enough for me!”

    You’re easy to please. Couldn’t stand either candidate. Or the ‘mainstream media.’ Tell us, Sparkon. How many of DJT’s campaign promises have been broken so far? China? A “beautiful chocolate cake?” Wait, this may be easier. How many DJT promises have yet to be broken?
  73. @Sparkon

    Tell us his theory
     
    I gave you Weisberg's own words. You may ignore, misunderstand, or misread whatever you choose, but at your own peril.

    For emphasis and good presentation, I used the blockquote tag, but you do seem ignorant of its purpose. Maybe you're just too lazy to be bothered with convention, and good presentation, but always energetic enough, it would seem, to rally to the defense of the usual suspects, however garishly.


    Tell us Sparkon, did ‘Whitewash’ touch all those bases? Did it zero in on Jews and Israel? Did they kill JFK?
     
    My recollection after all these years is that Weisberg in Whitewash doesn't mention the Jews or Israel at all, but maybe you should resign yourself to the clever tactic, but apparently dreaded last resort, of actually reading Whitewash yourself to answer these compulsive questions you have: you know, go all bold and daring into the fringe media where narrow minds never venture, so you wouldn't be so ignorant about Whitewash, and perhaps a tad less hypocritical when you write:

    ...actually “study” what they “comment about”...They’re way beyond study...
     
    Now, you are seemingly trying to drag in all that other stuff, and connect it to Whitewash and Weisberg, apparently as evidence of your own density or ignorance, poor chap, but at least as I see it--he will have to speak for himself--dykstra's cite of Weisberg applies only to Whitewash, which encompasses only Weisberg's critique of the Warren Report--as if it needed explaining, although I acknowledge his presentation is not very good, leaving the door open a crack, I guess, for those eager to mount another fallacious attack on the messengers, which is what you do, and the antics we can enjoy, if for no other reason than education.

    Why isn’t it mainstream?
     
    Such a perplexing question! Gosh, where to start? Mainstream media have the money behind them, and as we know, those with the gold make the rules. The fact that Whitewash may not qualify as mainstream reflects the fact that the moneyboys behind the mainstream do not like it, and refuse to publish it. A rational person may recognize this as the best recommendation of all.

    Similarly, no matter what else one might say or think about Pres. Trump, one overarching fact is that the mainstream media don't like him.

    That alone is good enough for me!

    After all, the mainstream media are the lying sacks of shit we're looking for.

    “Tell us his theory” “I gave you Weisberg’s own words. You may ignore, misunderstand, or misread whatever you choose, but at your own peril.”

    The Wikapedia blurb? “Following thousands of hours of research in and analysis of the vast, chaotic, deliberately disorganized, padded and largely meaningless 26 volumes … I establish that the inquiry into the assassination was a whitewash, using as proof only what the Commission avoided, ignored, misrepresented and suppressed of its own evidence”?

    That’s proof of a coverup? If he spent ‘tens of thousands of hours’ (or said so) would that make him even more credible? You’re not being treated for paranoia are you? Just in case, be assured I’d never willingly ignore Weisberg. Wouldn’t want to put myself in “peril.”

    “My recollection after all these years is that Weisberg in Whitewash doesn’t mention the Jews or Israel at all, but maybe you should resign yourself to the clever tactic…”

    “Tactic” Sparkon? Forget jilles post #60? “One can make a long list of accidents, suicides and murders that happened to benefit Israel…The tradition with asjkenazi jews for political murder goes back to tzarist Russia…Jews murdered Bernadotte…Hammarskjöld, he was too impartial, in jewish eyes…The Cheka consisted of mainly jews…There is no doubt whatsoever that Kennedy threatened Israel with no longer selling or giving them weapons if they continued making the atomic bomb…The Warren Report just was whitewash”?

    “Gosh” as you might say! jilles (your pal) mentions Israel and Jews a lot. Forget? Amazing when you can’t recall Weisburg mentioning “the Jews or Israel at all.” What’s jilles “tactic” Sparkon?

    “Now, you are seemingly trying to drag in all that other stuff, and connect it to Whitewash and Weisberg, apparently as evidence of your own density or ignorance, poor chap…”

    Not at all. “All that other stuff” existed when you (uninvited) defended jilles and paired him with Jacues/Jacques Sheete as sacred “messengers.” You’ve since avoided specific comments on their posts. Your only contribution is Wikapedia, personal invective and blockquote hygiene tips. Simpleton passive-aggressive behavior. With a touch of paranoid inferiority.

    “Similarly, no matter what else one might say or think about Pres. Trump, one overarching fact is that the mainstream media don’t like him…That alone is good enough for me!”

    You’re easy to please. Couldn’t stand either candidate. Or the ‘mainstream media.’ Tell us, Sparkon. How many of DJT’s campaign promises have been broken so far? China? A “beautiful chocolate cake?” Wait, this may be easier. How many DJT promises have yet to be broken?

    Read More
  74. If I utter a threat towards you, and dependant on how it is interpretted, I may be arrested for misdemeanor, or felony assault up to a terroist threat which carries 17 years. . But not the freaks on TV who terrorize everyone daily. This includes the weatherman. Deadly Mega Storm coming your way. Right?

    Read More
  75. The good news is that, in the United States, credibility of the mainstream media has been falling like a rock.

    While many mainstream media outlets have cried foul over Donald Trump targeting outlets as “failing” or peddling “fake news,” that sentiment is largely shared by a majority of Americans.

    Gallup found that Americans’ trust in the mass media “to report the news fully, accurately and fairly” reached its lowest level in polling history, with only 32 percent saying they have a great deal or fair amount of trust in the media.

    …after a steady decline over the past 20 years, it took its deepest dive yet…

    http://wjla.com/news/nation-world/main-stream-media-continue-to-lose-the-publics-trust

    So much for the bogus notion that Americans are under the spell of the MSM. It’s just more fake news, which itself is merely a neologism, or euphemism for propaganda.

    Indeed, despite what the media constantly trumpet, Americans are remarkably skeptical about BS: we know what it looks like, and how it smells. For example, from the very beginning, a majority of Americans believed there was a conspiracy to kill JFK

    Americans were skeptical about the “lone gunman” theory almost immediately after Kennedy was killed. In a poll conducted Nov. 22-27, 1963, Gallup found that 29% of Americans believed one man was responsible for the shooting and 52% believed others were involved in a conspiracy.

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/165893/majority-believe-jfk-killed-conspiracy.aspx

    As he arrived in NYC in 1909 for a series of lectures on psychoanalysis, Freud is reported to have remarked to Jung, “They don’t realize we are bringing them the plague.”

    But Freud did not defend psychoanalysis on the basis of its therapeutic effectiveness; he had other, perhaps more imperial ambitions. (“Somewhere in my soul,” he admitted, “I am a fanatical Jew.”)

    http://www.chronicle.com/article/Freuds-Visit-to-Clark-U/48424

    And we hear the wailing still.

    Read More
  76. @jilles dykstra
    Would Ford have lied in his own book ?
    Ford had prevented being blackmailed by banks by forcing his dealers to finance him.
    But what could he do against an international boycott ?

    Jilles,

    Always thx, even if you are posting rubbish at times.

    I want to reply to Alden’s post of the horror of our wartime efforts, I have likely studied that more than anyone else here, and do not want to give excuses, but there are no good excuses for the fire-bombing campaigns and finally atomic bombs here.

    I think the same goes for Germany, Hamburg, Dresden, etc., fire-bombing of Tokyo, many other places.

    Regards, work tomorrow, but I love the shots of our planes hitting and sinking the US ships at the Battle of Okinawa, it is magnificent.

    Close there, cheers is most definitely inappropriate.

    Regards.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
While other top brass played press agents for the administration’s war, William Odom told the truth about Iraq—though few listened.
A thousand years of meritocracy shaped the Middle Kingdom.