The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Boyd D. Cathey Archive
The Self-Consuming Madness of the Social Justice Warriors
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_705142495
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Hurricane Harvey has been an incredible disaster, and we should keep the poor and beleaguered citizens of east Texas and southwestern Louisiana in our constant prayers and do what we can to assist them. This is a moment of need that will probably continue for months.

About this immense and unprecedented natural disaster, I found it utterly unspeakable that a Leftist sociology professor at the University of Tampa, by name of Ken Storey, wrote via social media, that the folks in east Texas are getting what they deserved from Hurricane Harvey—because they voted for President Trump! He called it “karma.” Although he has since apologized (and been terminated), such a display of “thoughtful” Leftwing “social justice,” “peace,” and “concern for the poor,” demonstrates the actual depth of sheer vicious hatred and frenzied lunacy that those people exhibit.

Their “concern,” such as it is, only seems to apply to wealthy brainwashed students whose parents can mindlessly fork over $50,000 a year to have their offspring mis-educated and indoctrinated at overpriced Marxist hothouses pretending to be institutions of higher learning, or to favored “minority groups” (e.g., LGBTQ, feminists, illegal aliens, and those black folks who obediently exist on the new culturally Marxist Democrat plantation).

Sadly, in the America of 2017 Professor Storey’s views are by no means unique. Indeed, such expressions have also been uttered by other “enlightened” champions of the progressivist Revolution, and these sentiments reflect views of millions of our fellow citizens.

And we are supposed to find “unity” with those people? Alas, recall the words of the Gospel of St. Matthew (10:34): “Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword”—words which are repeated in other passages of Holy Scripture.

That brings me to the recent demonstrations and violence in Charlottesville, Durham and most recently, Berkeley—again. And, in particular, the response to this from many of this nation’s Republican and “conservative” leaders.

Of course, the response from the Mainstream Media [MSM] and their whorish minions in the Democratic Party was to be expected. The fact is that one of America’s two major political parties has become little more than a front group and mouthpiece for open Marxist revolution in this country, and that the MSM, despite its dishonest posturing that it is still “objective,” has become a weaponized Praetorian Guard for the most advanced, most violent and worst Communist, “antifa” and anarchist scum imaginable.

The narrative spun out post-Charlottesville is that there must be one, giant universal condemnation of something called the “Alt-Right,” that is, a vaguely perceived assortment of the KKK, neo-Nazis, and “white nationalists.” And when President Trump not only condemned those folks in clear and unmistakable terms, but also suggested that the violence came from both a few of the legal Unite the Right demonstrators, but also, perhaps even more so, from the illegal, club-bearing, mace-can-holding “antifa,” Black Lives Matter, “Resist,” and other violent Marxists, bused into Charlottesville (with assistance of funds funneled into their accounts by globalist George Soros), well, you would have thought the Eschaton had arrived!

And, then, most recently, this past weekend [August 26-27] an attempted peaceful march by folks, mostly College Republicans from the University of California-Berkeley and members of the Patriot Prayer group, urging dialogue and the civil exchange of ideas, was thwarted and those who dared to show up were set upon, again by hooded, “antifa,” BLM, “resist Trump” Marxists and anarchists, armed with clubs and bats, cans of mace, cattle prods, and other such instruments of social justice and peace. And all the while holding signs denouncing “hate” and “racism” and, of course, the president.

After Charlottesville there went up the hue and cry from Republican Senators Mitch McConnell, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Jeff Flake, Orrin Hatch, Bob Corker, and others, plus House Speaker Paul Ryan and most of those irrepressible Neoconservative pundits on Fox, that the president had committed a grievous moral fault by somehow equating those “anti-hate” demonstrators with the thoroughly “hate-filled” Alt-Right folks. How could he be so obtuse and so tone-deaf, they asked in puffed-up moral indignation?

But, let me ask: how many of these self-professed Republican arbiters of “moral virtue” have taken a deeper look at what really occurred in Charlottesville and its implications? Even Nancy Pelosi has now been compelled to denounce the very blatant and unrestrained violence of “antifa” in Berkeley. But how many GOP leaders understand that the message of the radical Marxist mob in Berkeley is the same that they brought to Charlottesville?

How many see what is actually happening and has happened to this nation?

From these Republican supposed defenders of the traditional beliefs of Americans we get silence, and, as such, they stand accused before history and before the basic standards of human decency and morality of crass and despicable blindness and ideological legerdemain. They have, essentially, bought into the powerful Deep State and Leftist template and mindset that now dogmatically seeks to define right and wrong, good and evil, and silence all dissent. Again, I use the phrase coined a century ago by French politician, Rene Renoult, “pas d’ennemis a gauche!” “There are no enemies on the Left!” This is the narrative and the benchmark they implicitly, if not explicitly, accept.

Although it can be argued that perhaps the Ryans and the Flakes (no pun intended!) did not have “all the facts” about Charlottesville, there are just too many instances where the same commentary, the same response, has come from them as from those brazen militants on the Left. Although they zealously protest that they are “conservatives,” that they oppose “big government” and “defend liberty,” and so on, their actions belie their words. No; their essential philosophical outlook, like the committed Deep State Democrats, has been largely shaped…polluted and subverted…by the dominant culturally Marxist environment in which they live and their innate understanding that it is the Potomac River Establishment “swamp” and Wall Street, not to mention such internationalist financial ogres as George Soros, that eventually call the shots and provide the goodies.

They have fatally compromised whatever “moral” authority they may ever have had, and, as such, they no longer have any moral authority left.

It is, then, up to grass roots traditionalists and “deplorables” to call them out, loudly and boldly: “Have you no shame, Senator?” “Have you no moral standards, Congressman?” “How dare you speak as you have and claim to represent me, much less, the heritage and traditional beliefs of the American citizenry?”

“Come November 2018 and in succeeding years, we shall buy you a one-way bus ticket on Trailways back home!”

That should be our unalterable commitment and promise…not only to ourselves, but to our children and for the future of this country.

What Charlottesville, Berkeley, Durham, the “antifa”—Black Lives Matter—“Resist” mobs, and both the explicit and implicit support they garner from the Establishment, have demonstrated is that we confront an irresistible, impending crisis like none seen in this nation for over a century. We stare into the faces of our fellow citizens who have literally fallen into a state of madness, a mental “sickness” which now exhibits all the symptoms of an intellectual rabies pandemic. By far it is worse and more dangerous than the challenge of an old-fashioned stodgy Soviet Communism, for its essentially religious fervor is marked by an unquenchable fanaticism and destructiveness that can perhaps only be compared to the zealotry of the fiercest ISIS militant. But, at least the ISIS terrorists believe in an eventual reward in the afterlife. Our homegrown Marxist “social justice warriors” have no such hope; their very existence is wrapped up completely in the continuing and all-consuming fire of the never-ending struggle. It is the definition of Hell, itself.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Charlottesville, Social Justice Warriors 
    []
  1. Giuseppe says:

    a Leftist sociology professor at the University of Tampa, by name of Ken Storey, wrote via social media, that the folks in east Texas are getting what they deserved from Hurricane Harvey—because they voted for President Trump! He called it “karma.” Although he has since apologized (and been terminated)

    What Storey said was perfectly asinine but termination is absolutely ridiculous. People can’t say stupid things, left or right, or offer an opinion that is sort of out there anymore. What is this, the Civil War?

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    No, this is The Reign of Terror 2.0 ... As Robespierre himself once said

    "If the basis of popular government in peacetime is virtue, the basis of popular government during a revolution is both virtue and terror; virtue, without which terror is baneful; terror, without which virtue is powerless. Terror is nothing more than speedy, severe and inflexible justice; it is thus an emanation of virtue; it is less a principle in itself, than a consequence of the general principle of democracy, applied to the most pressing needs of the patrie."
     
    If it is any consolation, Robespierre was himself executed, and the Committee for Public Safety was, by popular demand, "reformed" and subsequently weakened.
    , @Authenticjazzman
    " What is this, civil war"

    Yeah, guess what it IS "civil war" and it was started by them, and they won't let up until either they or we are finally totally subdued.

    If one were to undertake a survey of party affiliation of people sitting in the waiting rooms of Psychiatrists, one would come to the not surprising result that 98% of them indentify as : Democrats.

    They SJW, anti-fa, etc, they are crazy and the longer they are not dealt with in this light the tougher it will be to stop the nation from dying.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army vet, and pro jazz musician.
    , @MBlanc46
    "What is this, the Civil War?"

    It's a cold civil war, so far, but it's heating up.
    , @SMK
    "People can't say stupid things, left or right, or offer an opinion that is sort of out there anymore."

    The only reason this scum was fired is because he didn't have tenure and because his comments were preternaturally vile and outrageous. He was extolling the immiseration, homelessness, devastation, impoverishment, and deaths of million of people because they voted for Trump. Tenured professors can say anything that isn't subject to criminal and/or civil penalties, however false, demonstrably so, absurd, psychotic, deranged, outrageous, etc. Many aren't even fired for explicitly calling for violence against groups and individuals.

    What percentage of tenured professors are left-liberals, and what percentage are cultural Marxists, communists, white-hating black racialists, doctrinaire feminists, SJW, La Raza revanchists, antifa sympathizers, ad nauseam?

    How many tenured professors are race-realists, white advocates, and immigration restrictionists who oppose an invasion of Third-Word legal and illegal aliens for explicitly racial and pro-white reasons -and, in respect to Muslims, also religious/cultural reasons? And even if there are any such professors, and even if they can't be fired to stating the facts and noting the obvious and telling the truth and living in the real world, they'd be compelled to quit their jobs so as not to be the victims of constant harassment, threats of violence, serious violence, and perhaps even murder.
    , @Randal

    What Storey said was perfectly asinine but termination is absolutely ridiculous. People can’t say stupid things, left or right, or offer an opinion that is sort of out there anymore.
     
    That was my first thought on reading that anecdote, as well. It's encouraging to see I'm not alone in that as I rather feared I would be.

    That said, it's difficult not to see the leftists, for a change, suffering from this kind of thing as being poetic justice, at least, and quite possibly the only way to slowly bring home to some, at least, of them the real stupidity of their repressive attitudes.
    , @Anon
    Let's get some perspective here. Any college prof from ANY era in American history who said what Storey did would have been fired. At no point would this have been tolerated by any college administration which does, after all, have to support itself by attracting students via parents who agree to pay their kids' tuition. It's bad salesmanship for the college, from the administration's point of view.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /article/the-self-consuming-madness-of-the-social-justice-warriors/#comment-1998101
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Trump is gone.
    The swamp engulfed #MAGA
    We are next.
    The kill list has been gathered.
    My family been here since 1630.
    I have graves in all the American wars, including with the revolutionary war.
    Revolutionary blood runs through my veins.
    I won’t go quietly.

    Read More
  3. Thomm says:

    SJWs are the dregs of humanity. White Nationalists (who are also leftists, albeit of a slightly different sort) are just as bad.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johnny Smoggins
    "White Nationalists (who are also leftists.........."

    Could you qualify and quantify that statement?

    White nationalism isn't an economic philosophy so while I'm sure there are some WNs who may fall under the category of "leftist" it has no central bearing on what defines a White nationalist. I would also argue that the majority of WNs are more right leaning than left. Perhaps I'm wrong. Could you clarify what you meant?

    What percentage of WNs would you say, exactly, are leftists?
    , @fnn
    How do you define leftism? Anything other than pure laissez-faire capitalism? By that standard, all the major powers of WW2 (NS Germany, USSR and New Deal America ) were leftist-making fleeing to Mexico as a draft evader the best option.
    , @Joe Franklin
    What your kind typically labels white nationalism is actually demands for equality under the laws of the US constitution.

    US constitution is supposed to guarantee equal protection of the laws enumerated in the constitution, not special unconstitutional federal rights for diversity freaks.

    The 14th amendment applies the enumerated rights of the constitution to the state governments; it does not create new and nebulous federal rights for diversity freaks as leftist liars frequently claim.

    Diversity and ANTIFA clowns can't stomach the US constitution as written because they are protected class supremacists similar to Bolsheviks.

    ......................................................................................................................................

    Feminist are federally entitled because of Male oppression
    Jewish are federally entitled because of Gentile oppression
    Queers are federally entitled because of Straight oppression
    Muslims are federally entitled because of Christian oppression
    Disabled are federally entitled because of Healthy oppression
    Afro-blacks are federally entitled because of White oppression
    Latinos are federally entitled because of Gringo oppression
    Hispanics are federally entitled because of Gringo oppression
    Military Veterans are federally entitled because of Militia oppression
    Native Americans are federally entitled because of Paleface oppression
    Asians are federally entitled because of Occidental oppression
    International Socialist are federally entitled because of Local Government oppression
    Social Justice Crony Capitalist are federally entitled because of Honest Businessmen oppression
    Zionist-Neocons are federally entitled because of Anti-Fascist oppression
    , @Anonymous White Male
    Can you explain to us why "White Nationalism" is wrong? I think you are confusing White Nationalism with White Supremacism. Not that White Supremacism is wrong, since everyone already believes in it anyway. Whites because they realize that Whites have provided the majority of science and technology that has eliminated disease, provided food for the world, and made life more pleasant. Others because they realize they can't live at a first world standard without Whites, with the possible exception of northeastern Orientals. I like something that the Oregon Muse posted on Ace of Spades.

    "Progressives think that America is the worst nation in the world, full of violence, racism, sexism, homophobia and Islamophobia and ruled by Literally Hitler in an orange fright wig. So why don't they post warning signs on the border of this evil country and try to keep people out instead of inviting them all in?"

    Another of his cogent points stated:

    "What I want to know is, since when did American citizenship become a human right?"

    But, according to you, if we prevent those we don't want to be here from becoming citizens we are White Nationalists, which, in your opinion, is beyond the pale of human behavior. Seems more like commonsense to me.

    Thomm, can you point to a White country that has allowed non-Whites in it that is better off for that mistake? And "diversity" is not an honest response, nor is "Everybody knows this is true!". What have they brought to the table? Are there some races that are net negatives in maintaining the country they have been allowed to migrate to? And also, if the US collapses and forms different ethnic enclaves which then choose to allow citizenship only to Whites, will that be bad as well?

    , @SMK
    So immigration restrictionists and white advocates and race-realists are "leftists" who are "just as bad" as SJW and cultural Marxists who seek to transform the U.S. into a nonwhite-majority country in which European-Americans are an increasingly dispossessed and persecuted minority.
  4. Miro23 says:

    The fact is that one of America’s two major political parties has become little more than a front group and mouthpiece for open Marxist revolution in this country, and that the MSM, despite its dishonest posturing that it is still “objective,” has become a weaponized Praetorian Guard for the most advanced, most violent and worst Communist, “antifa” and anarchist scum imaginable.

    The American Sodom and Gomorrah.

    Or taking Spain in 1936. Violent organized mobs of anarchists and republican left extremists burnt down hundreds of churches and other religious buildings in Madrid and other cities while the Republican (Bolshevik) national press cheered them on.

    Historian Stanley Payne put it this way in his even handed account “The Spanish Civil War” https://www.amazon.es/Spanish-Civil-Cambridge-Essential-Histories/dp/0521174708

    “…. Even though the authority of this government steadily declined, it would remain the key actor for the next five months, with responsibility for guiding the country and avoiding breakdown or civil war. It failed to meet these responsibilities because its priorities were, first, to maintain an exclusively all leftist government that rejected any compromise with the centre or moderate right, and second, to avoid any break with the revolutionaries, because their support was necessary to remain in power . The Republic’s first historian, the noted Catalan journalist Josep Pla, termed this strategy Azana’s “ideological Kerenskyism” referring to the Russian prime minister who also fell to the Bolsheviks.”

    The point seems to be that the government was not ready to compromise with traditional Spain and turned a blind eye to leftist violence.

    In American terms, Trump looks a lot like Calvo Sotelo, a powerless traditionalist surrounded by crazy counter cultural extremists – and for the record, Calvo-Sotelo was soon removed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @prusmc
    Not one in a hundred US college graduates including History majors know who Calvo Sotelo was so a Calvo Sotelo moment is a non-starter. Unlike Spain, there is not a single institution which has a shred of loyality or influence toward traditional American values, ideals or goals. Who will be a potential Francisco Franco on the USSR todsy? Gen. Betrayous, Diversity George Casey, Admiral Howard, Martin Dempsey, Gary North, Mad Dog, Lover Boy Allen, Kelly etc. they're all on the other side. Sadly so are the police and most sherrifs.
  5. wayfarer says:

    At a recent false-flag film production in Charlottesville Virginia, a troupe of intern crisis-actors and b-list drama queens utilized a genre of melodramatic performance art, in an attempt to convince the world that a public display of three confederate and two nazi flags represented more than just 0.0000015% of the 326,625,791 people in America.

    No, this arrogant display of white supremacist antagonism clearly indicates that liberal-left non-profits like the SPLC with $328 million in net assets will require even more tax-exempt cash donations, in order to continue fighting their manufactured “War on Hate!” in America.

    USHMM’s photo opportunity.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170905105133/https://www.ushmm.org/

    Read More
  6. I found it utterly unspeakable that a Leftist sociology professor at the University of Tampa, by name of Ken Storey, wrote via social media, that the folks in east Texas are getting what they deserved from Hurricane Harvey—because they voted for President Trump!

    It’s the secular quasi-spiritual version of a Christian saying some natural disaster was punishment from God. It goes to show that the PC mindset is essentially quasi-religious. In their eyes, Texas is Sodom because it went for Trump and lags behind in worshiping the true faith of Homomania and Open Borders.

    As terrible as the professor’s statement was, I don’t think he should have been terminated for that. It’s a matter of creed. If he really believes that, it’s a personal matter. We can denounce him as a person but as a professional, he should only be judged by his competence at the college.

    Suppose someone says he believes an earthquake in San Fran is God’s punishment for the homos. Many people may be appalled, but should the man be fired from his profession for his ‘offensive’ views?

    Read More
    • Replies: @helena
    In an ideal world, no. But this game can be won by mirroring. Because, ultimately, the Left does not make sense, because it is relativistic. So the only way to beat the Left is by copying what they do, or rather the inverse. That way the inconsistencies in their ideology can be made manifest.
    , @Jake
    To the Left, Sodom is good, at least in the sense that it is a victim if right wing Christian hate.
    , @animalogic
    Concepts like karma or "deserve" are juvenile. There is only cause & effect.
    Houston is a known site of extreme weather events. There has also been a sustained failure to invest in the infrastructure to mitigate such events- ergo....
    , @Nicholas Stix
    Priss Factor: "As terrible as the professor’s statement was, I don’t think he should have been terminated for that."

    Sometimes, two wrongs make a right. This is one of those times.

    If Ken Storey doesn't get fired, it means that Communists can act with carte blanche, while non-Coms can get fired for nothing. Communists must know that there are some acts that will result in their termination. Even with that, the situation in higher ed is intolerable, but let's try and keep it from getting worse still.
  7. Charlottesville was Tiananmen or Prague Crushing for the Alt Right.

    Still, there’s more freedom in the US to regroup.

    Tet.

    Read More
  8. “….their very existence is wrapped up completely in the continuing and all-consuming fire of the never-ending struggle. It is the definition of Hell, itself.”

    This leftist collective IS the Sovietisation of the United States. If/when their project is completed and they wake up to what they have been supporting, these passionate idiots will be off to the Gulag/Fema camps.

    If they’re lucky.

    Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov talks about very important matters, including the fate of EXACTLY such SJW people (at about 3:30) here:

    He raises the terrible dangers of impending US government Communism and suggests the educational program required for American survival.

    Read More
  9. Brabantian says: • Website

    There is an unusually powerful critique of the anti-free-speech mania, just published on Dissident Voice by former University of Ottawa physics professor Denis Rancourt

    What is distinctive in Rancourt’s short piece, is how he gives context to this phenomenon as a pathology of elites which cannot endure, given how it is severely de-stabilising, potentially bringing down the system upon the heads of the elites themselves as well as of the common folk

    Rancourt describes the legal system, as something which must be ‘balanced’ in favour of common folk if the society is to survive at all … As Rancourt points out, when elites can continually ‘hack’ the legal-judicial framework to their selfish benefit, success can only be short-term, as the system itself begins to rock and sway toward break-up. From Rancourt’s article:

    Anti-expression laws are eminently pathological from a systemic perspective.

    The anti-speech laws, whether cast as “hate speech” criminal code provisions, or civil defamation law, or civility “codes of conduct” on campuses, have been manipulatively introduced by the elite because the elite are those most threatened by free speech and free association.

    The present USA (civil) war on “hate expression” and its condoning by large swaths of society is a measure of a high degree of totalitarianism and a concomitant high degree of manipulation of public sentiment. It is an indicator of fundamental internal instability of the kind that accompanies the collapse of an empire.

    Civil rights are codified in law to protect mechanisms of essential counter measures against excessive exploitation of the hierarchy by elite classes, which destabilizes the entire society. Systemic pathology arises when elite classes can change the regulatory codes themselves, including civil rights protections, with impunity. Laws that quash civil rights are pathological in that they impede the system-repair mechanisms that are: free expression, free association, class opposition, and negotiated structural adjustments (otherwise known as democracy). Present anti-speech laws are extreme examples of pathological laws, the application of which is a measure of the degree of totalitarianism in the society.

    [Legal] codes themselves are often “hacked” by upper-strata groups that are overly ambitious in seeking additional relative advantages. The hacking upper-strata groups will recklessly change the laws for their own advantage in ways that materially threaten overall stability. This produces “pathological” laws that destabilize the overall hierarchy by driving society towards an intolerable degree of totalitarianism.

    https://dissidentvoice.org/2017/09/cause-of-usa-meltdown-and-collapse-of-civil-rights/

    Denis G. Rancourt was hit by a libel action after critiquing another professor, a black, as a ‘House Negro’. He is also a major ‘climate science’ sceptic:

    http://climateguy.blogspot.co.uk/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    Rancourt describes the legal system, as something which must be ‘balanced’ in favour of common folk if the society is to survive at all … As Rancourt points out, when elites can continually ‘hack’ the legal-judicial framework to their selfish benefit, success can only be short-term, as the system itself begins to rock and sway toward break-up.
     
    And behind this there's Trust/Morality, which is the unspoken common ground that unites society in much more depth than legislation.

    Take away the trust, morality and free speech and you take away the engine's lubricant, the system overheats and heads towards breakup or at least runs very slowly and inefficiently. The Soviets had enormous problems in getting their low trust, exploitative command economy work.
  10. Zoodles says:

    Mainstream conservatives are concerned with their position and social status. They dont want to win. They just want to enjoy their perks. They are perfectly happy being controlled opposition as long as they can keep their jobs at prestigious thinktanks and magazines and be able to hobnob with the Good People.

    The energies powering the alt-right are enormous, and these energies are growing. Properly harnessed, those energies are strong enough to overthrow the Social JustISIS scum. But Conservatism inc. doesn’t see the energies powering the so-called alt-right as a potential vanguard, they see it as a threat to their position. They would prefer to lose to the left and hold onto their scraps of social status than win and potentially lose their place as the big fish in their tiny pond. They are too stupid to understand that they will no longer be needed at all if the left finally wins.

    And so those energies will be harnessed by a much more radical and nihilistic group of people who do not care what the New York Times thinks and has a vested interest in burning everything to the ground.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    Corporate conservatives are bankrolled by the same folks who bankroll the Left: the transnational business class.
  11. “By far it is worse and more dangerous than the challenge of an old-fashioned stodgy Soviet Communism…” Absolutely, today’s SJWs by comparison make Brezhnev and his gang look like benevolent avuncular types straight out of Norman Rockwell. Even more horrifying is to see the likes of Mitt Romney defending them.

    See: http://fosterspeak.blogspot.com/2017/09/words-weapons-and-rituals-of-left-and.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier
    Romney is and has always been a scumbag. Like McCain. And Ryan.
  12. The fact that Pelosi was forced to denounce the atifa suggests the antifa aren’t polling well with the little people. Republicans seem to have their noses too far up donors’ nether parts to pick this up, and they reflexively throw the peaceful, law-abiding majority of the alt-Right under the bus because they have never gotten over the loser mentality they picked up by being out of the majority for the 60 or so years following FDR.

    The GOP really is the Stupid Party.

    Read More
  13. Langley says:

    Robert Kennedy Junior said the same thing about the state of Mississippi when Katrina was forecast to strike there instead of Louisiana.

    Read More
  14. @Thomm
    SJWs are the dregs of humanity. White Nationalists (who are also leftists, albeit of a slightly different sort) are just as bad.

    “White Nationalists (who are also leftists……….”

    Could you qualify and quantify that statement?

    White nationalism isn’t an economic philosophy so while I’m sure there are some WNs who may fall under the category of “leftist” it has no central bearing on what defines a White nationalist. I would also argue that the majority of WNs are more right leaning than left. Perhaps I’m wrong. Could you clarify what you meant?

    What percentage of WNs would you say, exactly, are leftists?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm
    All race nationalists tend to have economic views that are left-wing. They want tariffs, protectionism, and intra-white socialism.

    Hitler was left-wing. Nazi stood for 'Nationalist Socialist'.
    The KKK was Democrat.
    Contemporary WNs have uniformaly left-wing economic views. This is not a secret.

    What percentage of WNs would you say, exactly, are leftists?

    The vast majority.
  15. fnn says:

    Leftism in its essential form:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Terror#Atrocities

    At these times, there were numerous reports that Cheka interrogators used torture methods which were, according to Orlando Figes, “matched only by the Spanish Inquisition.”[26] At Odessa the Cheka tied White officers to planks and slowly fed them into furnaces or tanks of boiling water; in Kharkiv, scalpings and hand-flayings were commonplace: the skin was peeled off victims’ hands to produce “gloves”; the Voronezh Cheka rolled naked people around in barrels studded internally with nails; victims were crucified or stoned to death at Dnipropetrovsk; the Cheka at Kremenchuk impaled members of the clergy and buried alive rebelling peasants; in Orel, water was poured on naked prisoners bound in the winter streets until they became living ice statues; in Kiev, Chinese Cheka detachments placed rats in iron tubes sealed at one end with wire netting and the other placed against the body of a prisoner, with the tubes being heated until the rats gnawed through the victim’s body in an effort to escape.[27]

    Executions took place in prison cellars or courtyards, or occasionally on the outskirts of town, during the Red Terror and Russian Civil War. After the condemned were stripped of their clothing and other belongings, which were shared among the Cheka executioners, they were either machine-gunned in batches or dispatched individually with a revolver. Those killed in prison were usually shot in the back of the neck as they entered the execution cellar, which became littered with corpses and soaked with blood. Victims killed outside the town were moved by truck, bound and gagged, to their place of execution, where they sometimes were made to dig their own graves.[28]

    According to Edvard Radzinsky, “it became a common practice to take a husband hostage and wait for his wife to come and purchase his life with her body”.[3] During Decossackization, there were massacres, according to historian Robert Gellately, “on an unheard of scale”. The Pyatigorsk Cheka organized a “day of Red Terror” to execute 300 people in one day, and took quotas from each part of town. According to the Chekist Karl Lander, the Cheka in Kislovodsk, “for lack of a better idea”, killed all the patients in the hospital. In October 1920 alone more than 6,000 people were executed. Gellately adds that Communist leaders “sought to justify their ethnic-based massacres by incorporating them into the rubric of the ‘class struggle’”.[29]

    Members of the clergy were subjected to particularly brutal abuse. According to documents cited by the late Alexander Yakovlev, then head of the Presidential Committee for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Political Repression, priests, monks and nuns were crucified, thrown into cauldrons of boiling tar, scalped, strangled, given Communion with melted lead and drowned in holes in the ice.[30] An estimated 3,000 were put to death in 1918 alone.[30]

    Read More
  16. @Giuseppe

    a Leftist sociology professor at the University of Tampa, by name of Ken Storey, wrote via social media, that the folks in east Texas are getting what they deserved from Hurricane Harvey—because they voted for President Trump! He called it “karma.” Although he has since apologized (and been terminated)
     
    What Storey said was perfectly asinine but termination is absolutely ridiculous. People can't say stupid things, left or right, or offer an opinion that is sort of out there anymore. What is this, the Civil War?

    No, this is The Reign of Terror 2.0 … As Robespierre himself once said

    “If the basis of popular government in peacetime is virtue, the basis of popular government during a revolution is both virtue and terror; virtue, without which terror is baneful; terror, without which virtue is powerless. Terror is nothing more than speedy, severe and inflexible justice; it is thus an emanation of virtue; it is less a principle in itself, than a consequence of the general principle of democracy, applied to the most pressing needs of the patrie.”

    If it is any consolation, Robespierre was himself executed, and the Committee for Public Safety was, by popular demand, “reformed” and subsequently weakened.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Logan
    To be entirely fair to Rob (something which I'm not all that inclined to be), the French revolutionary regime faced a crisis far greater than anything any US government has ever faced. Foreign armies closing in from all sides, traitorous generals, inexperienced armies retreating without firing a shot, traitors in the government itself, etc.

    Don't approve at all of the methods they used to deal with these threats, but that doesn't mean the threats weren't real. People can get remarkably vicious when cornered, and the Revolution was definitely cornered.

    Also, Rob was by no means the most vicious of the Terrorists. Some of those who were survived him and blackened his name in the interests of coveriing their own crimes.
  17. helena says:
    @Priss Factor
    I found it utterly unspeakable that a Leftist sociology professor at the University of Tampa, by name of Ken Storey, wrote via social media, that the folks in east Texas are getting what they deserved from Hurricane Harvey—because they voted for President Trump!

    It's the secular quasi-spiritual version of a Christian saying some natural disaster was punishment from God. It goes to show that the PC mindset is essentially quasi-religious. In their eyes, Texas is Sodom because it went for Trump and lags behind in worshiping the true faith of Homomania and Open Borders.

    As terrible as the professor's statement was, I don't think he should have been terminated for that. It's a matter of creed. If he really believes that, it's a personal matter. We can denounce him as a person but as a professional, he should only be judged by his competence at the college.

    Suppose someone says he believes an earthquake in San Fran is God's punishment for the homos. Many people may be appalled, but should the man be fired from his profession for his 'offensive' views?

    In an ideal world, no. But this game can be won by mirroring. Because, ultimately, the Left does not make sense, because it is relativistic. So the only way to beat the Left is by copying what they do, or rather the inverse. That way the inconsistencies in their ideology can be made manifest.

    Read More
  18. fnn says:
    @Thomm
    SJWs are the dregs of humanity. White Nationalists (who are also leftists, albeit of a slightly different sort) are just as bad.

    How do you define leftism? Anything other than pure laissez-faire capitalism? By that standard, all the major powers of WW2 (NS Germany, USSR and New Deal America ) were leftist-making fleeing to Mexico as a draft evader the best option.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sane Left Libertarian

    How do you define leftism? Anything other than pure laissez-faire capitalism? By that standard, all the major powers of WW2 (NS Germany, USSR and New Deal America ) were leftist-making fleeing to Mexico as a draft evader the best option.

     

    Yes, unfortunately "Marxist" has no more meaning these days than "Nazi". Mr. Obama was the most corporate-friendly president in history, privatizing all sorts of things, ramping up the military, and giving our national healthcare to rapacious thieves and profiteers. Obama himself recognized that he is a 1980's republican. Yet, the fringe right continues to maintain that he is a Marxist, and that everyone who votes Democratic is as well. Beyond hyperbole and well into fantasyland.

    ETA: I have made unz a daily read for a couple months now because preposterous hyperbole and name-calling are generally absent - almost all of the content is very smart and well-reasoned. I'll need to take Mr. Cathey off of my read list.

  19. Liberals always assign themselves a superior moral position in order to justify the hatred and violence they spew against those who disagree with them…

    Read More
  20. Miro23 says:
    @Brabantian
    There is an unusually powerful critique of the anti-free-speech mania, just published on Dissident Voice by former University of Ottawa physics professor Denis Rancourt

    What is distinctive in Rancourt's short piece, is how he gives context to this phenomenon as a pathology of elites which cannot endure, given how it is severely de-stabilising, potentially bringing down the system upon the heads of the elites themselves as well as of the common folk

    Rancourt describes the legal system, as something which must be 'balanced' in favour of common folk if the society is to survive at all ... As Rancourt points out, when elites can continually 'hack' the legal-judicial framework to their selfish benefit, success can only be short-term, as the system itself begins to rock and sway toward break-up. From Rancourt's article:


    Anti-expression laws are eminently pathological from a systemic perspective.

    The anti-speech laws, whether cast as “hate speech” criminal code provisions, or civil defamation law, or civility “codes of conduct” on campuses, have been manipulatively introduced by the elite because the elite are those most threatened by free speech and free association.

    The present USA (civil) war on “hate expression” and its condoning by large swaths of society is a measure of a high degree of totalitarianism and a concomitant high degree of manipulation of public sentiment. It is an indicator of fundamental internal instability of the kind that accompanies the collapse of an empire.

    Civil rights are codified in law to protect mechanisms of essential counter measures against excessive exploitation of the hierarchy by elite classes, which destabilizes the entire society. Systemic pathology arises when elite classes can change the regulatory codes themselves, including civil rights protections, with impunity. Laws that quash civil rights are pathological in that they impede the system-repair mechanisms that are: free expression, free association, class opposition, and negotiated structural adjustments (otherwise known as democracy). Present anti-speech laws are extreme examples of pathological laws, the application of which is a measure of the degree of totalitarianism in the society.

    [Legal] codes themselves are often “hacked” by upper-strata groups that are overly ambitious in seeking additional relative advantages. The hacking upper-strata groups will recklessly change the laws for their own advantage in ways that materially threaten overall stability. This produces “pathological” laws that destabilize the overall hierarchy by driving society towards an intolerable degree of totalitarianism.

     

    https://dissidentvoice.org/2017/09/cause-of-usa-meltdown-and-collapse-of-civil-rights/

    Denis G. Rancourt was hit by a libel action after critiquing another professor, a black, as a 'House Negro'. He is also a major 'climate science' sceptic:
    http://climateguy.blogspot.co.uk/

    Rancourt describes the legal system, as something which must be ‘balanced’ in favour of common folk if the society is to survive at all … As Rancourt points out, when elites can continually ‘hack’ the legal-judicial framework to their selfish benefit, success can only be short-term, as the system itself begins to rock and sway toward break-up.

    And behind this there’s Trust/Morality, which is the unspoken common ground that unites society in much more depth than legislation.

    Take away the trust, morality and free speech and you take away the engine’s lubricant, the system overheats and heads towards breakup or at least runs very slowly and inefficiently. The Soviets had enormous problems in getting their low trust, exploitative command economy work.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dc.sunsets
    If anything, Americans became too trusting. They (we) were like marks lined up for fleecing by the legions of con artists represented on K-street.
  21. Jake says:
    @Priss Factor
    I found it utterly unspeakable that a Leftist sociology professor at the University of Tampa, by name of Ken Storey, wrote via social media, that the folks in east Texas are getting what they deserved from Hurricane Harvey—because they voted for President Trump!

    It's the secular quasi-spiritual version of a Christian saying some natural disaster was punishment from God. It goes to show that the PC mindset is essentially quasi-religious. In their eyes, Texas is Sodom because it went for Trump and lags behind in worshiping the true faith of Homomania and Open Borders.

    As terrible as the professor's statement was, I don't think he should have been terminated for that. It's a matter of creed. If he really believes that, it's a personal matter. We can denounce him as a person but as a professional, he should only be judged by his competence at the college.

    Suppose someone says he believes an earthquake in San Fran is God's punishment for the homos. Many people may be appalled, but should the man be fired from his profession for his 'offensive' views?

    To the Left, Sodom is good, at least in the sense that it is a victim if right wing Christian hate.

    Read More
  22. TG says:

    “The fact is that one of America’s two major political parties has become little more than a front group and mouthpiece for open Marxist revolution in this country”

    I must respectfully disagree. These ‘Social Justice Warriors’ are not mad – they are fools, they are gullible, they are chumps.

    They have been goaded into mindless actions which serve only to divide and conquer. They give cover for and provide a distraction to policies that the oligarchy favors, like open-borders cheap-labor immigration, wasting trillions of dollars on endless pointless winless wars on the other side of the planet while our own infrastructure crumbles, subsidizing speculative finance with trillions of dollars from the public treasury while starving main street of capital…

    The SJWs may talk Marxist, but they are useful idiots in the service of people like the Koch Brothers and the executives of Goldman Sachs and Bill Gates etc., and THESE people are very much NOT Marxist. Indeed, ‘cultural Marxist’ perhaps covers this – a Marxism concerned only with identity politics and old monuments – but the main force here is very much old-fashioned crony-capitalism kleptocracy.

    I respectfully submit that instead of falling into the trap of hating these SJWs – which would suit their backers just fine – we should pity them. If someone has been swindled we don’t usually call them insane or mad, just gullible or foolish. These SJWs have allowed themselves to be brainwashed by media coverage and herd instinct into thinking that screaming their mindless hatred for Trump or old statues is somehow going to have anything to do with jobs or healthcare or peace. They have been tricked into acting against their own interests, and the oligarchs are quietly laughing at them over glasses of champagne. Perhaps treating them with pity, as fools who have been conned, rather than as a mindless incoherent enemy, could be the deeper insult, and perhaps – perhaps – could make at least some of them reconsider (I can dream), whereas sticking with an us-vs-them conflict will lead nowhere good…

    Read More
    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    • Replies: @utu
    I agree with you. Most of SJW's are useful idiots. And they are not used by some hidden forcers of communist conspiracy but by our garden variety capitalists and libertarians like Koch brothers that you have mentioned.
    , @Authenticjazzman
    You have fallen into the trap of thinking that rich folks by virtue of the fact that they are in fact rich, cannot be Communists, and you are totally off base with this conclusion.
    On the contrary many of them are of the most rabid communistic mind-set, as paradoxical as it seems.

    Authenticjazzman " Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz artist.
  23. Anon says: • Website • Disclaimer

    http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/09/08/jennifer-lawrence-says-hurricanes-may-be-natures-wrath-for-trump-victory.html

    Another neo-Sodomism. Jennifer Lawrence says ‘nature’ punishes Texans for the election of Trump.

    Lawrence is a good illustration of why ‘white’ culture fails. Ashley Judd too.

    While many white communities tend to be ‘conservative’, they have no ideas and no culture of the mind/critique. So, when these bimbos go to Hollywood or some urban place, their empty minds become filled with Official Ideology associated with power and privilege. They are really conforming to Privilege but fooled into thinking it’s about ‘equality’ and ‘justice’. People who wanna rise above the rest pretend to stand up for the rest… or at least minorities and illegals.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm
    Lawrence is a good illustration of why ‘white’ culture fails. Ashley Judd too.

    Yes. White women, even the pretty ones, have zero race loyalty. Yet since WN is a goddess cult, the WN loser males will still worship a white woman no matter how much she is opposed to WN.
  24. Wally says: • Website

    And this is how they get away with it.

    [MORE]

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are laughable, scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    The ‘holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

    The ’6,000,000 Jews’ lie and the laughing Mexican:

    Read More
  25. utu says:
    @TG
    "The fact is that one of America’s two major political parties has become little more than a front group and mouthpiece for open Marxist revolution in this country"

    I must respectfully disagree. These 'Social Justice Warriors' are not mad - they are fools, they are gullible, they are chumps.

    They have been goaded into mindless actions which serve only to divide and conquer. They give cover for and provide a distraction to policies that the oligarchy favors, like open-borders cheap-labor immigration, wasting trillions of dollars on endless pointless winless wars on the other side of the planet while our own infrastructure crumbles, subsidizing speculative finance with trillions of dollars from the public treasury while starving main street of capital...

    The SJWs may talk Marxist, but they are useful idiots in the service of people like the Koch Brothers and the executives of Goldman Sachs and Bill Gates etc., and THESE people are very much NOT Marxist. Indeed, 'cultural Marxist' perhaps covers this - a Marxism concerned only with identity politics and old monuments - but the main force here is very much old-fashioned crony-capitalism kleptocracy.

    I respectfully submit that instead of falling into the trap of hating these SJWs - which would suit their backers just fine - we should pity them. If someone has been swindled we don't usually call them insane or mad, just gullible or foolish. These SJWs have allowed themselves to be brainwashed by media coverage and herd instinct into thinking that screaming their mindless hatred for Trump or old statues is somehow going to have anything to do with jobs or healthcare or peace. They have been tricked into acting against their own interests, and the oligarchs are quietly laughing at them over glasses of champagne. Perhaps treating them with pity, as fools who have been conned, rather than as a mindless incoherent enemy, could be the deeper insult, and perhaps - perhaps - could make at least some of them reconsider (I can dream), whereas sticking with an us-vs-them conflict will lead nowhere good...

    I agree with you. Most of SJW’s are useful idiots. And they are not used by some hidden forcers of communist conspiracy but by our garden variety capitalists and libertarians like Koch brothers that you have mentioned.

    Read More
  26. @Thomm
    SJWs are the dregs of humanity. White Nationalists (who are also leftists, albeit of a slightly different sort) are just as bad.

    What your kind typically labels white nationalism is actually demands for equality under the laws of the US constitution.

    US constitution is supposed to guarantee equal protection of the laws enumerated in the constitution, not special unconstitutional federal rights for diversity freaks.

    The 14th amendment applies the enumerated rights of the constitution to the state governments; it does not create new and nebulous federal rights for diversity freaks as leftist liars frequently claim.

    Diversity and ANTIFA clowns can’t stomach the US constitution as written because they are protected class supremacists similar to Bolsheviks.

    [MORE]

    ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

    Feminist are federally entitled because of Male oppression
    Jewish are federally entitled because of Gentile oppression
    Queers are federally entitled because of Straight oppression
    Muslims are federally entitled because of Christian oppression
    Disabled are federally entitled because of Healthy oppression
    Afro-blacks are federally entitled because of White oppression
    Latinos are federally entitled because of Gringo oppression
    Hispanics are federally entitled because of Gringo oppression
    Military Veterans are federally entitled because of Militia oppression
    Native Americans are federally entitled because of Paleface oppression
    Asians are federally entitled because of Occidental oppression
    International Socialist are federally entitled because of Local Government oppression
    Social Justice Crony Capitalist are federally entitled because of Honest Businessmen oppression
    Zionist-Neocons are federally entitled because of Anti-Fascist oppression

    Read More
  27. Sort of related:

    On the cover of Time Magazine

    I think Ilhan Omar is the first state legislator to have taken out a marriage certificate naming her brother as her husband. She is probably also the first state legislator to have taken out a marriage certificate naming her brother as her husband who also has a “cultural” husband as the father of her children….

    The Star Tribune followed up on the story last year, for example, but Omar declined to be interviewed. Democratic operative Ben Goldfarb spoke to the Star Tribune on Omar’s behalf: “Allegations that she married her brother and is legally married to two people are categorically ridiculous and false.” Omar’s campaign explained that she had never legally married “cultural” husband Ahmed Hirsi and flatly denied that Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, the guy named on her Minnesota marriage certificate, is her brother.

    Omar issued a statement that went back to the royal flush of bigotry accusations and decried the “Trump-style misogyny, racism, anti-immigration rhetoric and Islamophobic division” allegedly motivating questions about her marital status. When Star Tribune reporter Patrick Coolican requested a comment from me for his story, I asked him who Elmi is. “They won’t tell me,” he said….

    Omar prefers the national media to the Minnesota locals. The national media treat her like a rock star. They come to praise her. They don’t ask uncomfortable questions. They seek to add to her renown….

    The double standards she allegedly overcame are nothing compared to the double standards from which she has benefited. If Omar weren’t a Somali Muslim woman, she would have been expected to answer a few questions about her marital arrangements. If she were a conservative Republican, well, you know the rest of the story.

    http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/09/on-the-cover-of-time-magazine.php

    Read More
  28. So these are the people that mind control these people:

    To fight these people:

    https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Ffiftiesweb.com%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F07%2Ffifties-family.jpg&f=1

    Evil is most evil because it makes good people do bad things. Ouch!

    (Apologies to all the jews here, I wholeheartedly support Israel’s right to lebensraum in the Arab world as the arabs and russians are our sworn enemies I mean why are they our enemies, Yes they are our sworn enemies and must be crushed, agree)

    Read More
  29. One Tribe says:

    originally published at https://urblurb.wordpress.com/2017/09/03/get-over-the-political-left-to-right-divide/

    Get Over the Political Left to Right Divide

    2017 September 3rd

    It is definitely time to leave the old political characterizations of “Left” and “Right” behind.

    While one must be careful endorsing any large organizational entities, Wiki has an entry for “Left-Right political spectrum“. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left%E2%80%93right_political_spectrum

    While there may (?!) have been usefulness of this kind of binary differentiation in political discussions, these days, all it does is artificially fosters divisions within the 99%, further enabling the 0.1% to retain control above the inane din below.

    If you were to boil down the actual differences between these supposed ideologies, you might find, as I did, that ‘the left’ purports to in inherent, intrinsic level of responsibility, while ‘the right’ seems to support an attitude that if you paid for it, your responsibility is complete. Of course this is great simplification of the supposed spectrum (you could just as easily read ‘rectum‘), try it out for a while, and see what you think.

    The only real true divide in society is the top 0.1%-1% and the 99%, and this, of course, is in and of itself, a spectrum. But there is a significant difference between competing factions in the top 0.1% and everybody else, their defacto ‘jobs’ are maintaining the status quo for wealth/power divisions, in which they reign, versus the 99%, who are trying to make the most of what (little) they get.

    The artificial political divide maintained for the elite 0.1%, by their top 0.9% toadies is wearing thin after Charlottesville, and the Hillary Clinton Democratic National Committee cheat to win the Democrat nomination, then having been exposed by a leak, creating a full onslaught of fake Russia involvement news.

    So the two groups are: a. those that work towards maintaining their unreasonable control of power and wealth, and b. those that would like for a more equitable distribution of power and wealth, which needless to say, would comparatively favour them. There is a group c. the bottom 9/10ths of the top 1% (approximately) who vary across a range of i. being grateful for their existing level of wealth power, in the service of their masters in the top 0.1%, and willing to do whatever it takes to not slip into the bottom 99%, and ii. desiring to be in the top 0.1% and willing to do whatever it takes to get there.


    Recommendation:

    If you are in the 99%, better to let go of the left v. right divide and focus on addressing the dysfunctional distribution of wealth/power. The other differences between people in the 99% are less relevant until a better distribution of wealth/power is achieved.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Grandpa Charlie
    According to a website obviously not reliable on the subject, the SPLC ... but still there must be something to this and I make use of it only as a hypothetical:

    "In the first years of the 21st century, Cathey aided an extremist takeover attempt aimed at the Sons of Confederate Veterans, a Southern heritage group."
     
    Here the Left-Right relativistic thing may be meaningful, if we would describe the SCV as in the "Center". So there is a point, One Tribe, to your critique of the Left-Right spectrum, namely that you leave out the Center. I mean, if you think about it, you can't have Left/Right without Center. That's why Left/Right today seems to be a useless concept, because we have no Center, because our USA has been hollowed out.

    The Center might be like the middle squares of a chessboard -- so in theory, up for grabs at all times - still the Center is of enormous strategic interest. Sometimes the Center is vacant except for a million mines -- like the DMZ in Korea. Sometimes the Center looks to be hard-fought a USSR under Stalin or in North Korea under Kim Jong-un.

    Now, your 99% harks back to the days of OCCUPY and that harked back to the "Wobblies" or Industrial Workers of the World, which still exists today even though USA is indeed "post-industrial" or maybe "post-industrialized" (like "globalized"). The fact that IWW still exists attests to a few hardy souls who go beyond "true believers" to become an embattled few who refuse to come in out of the cold ... and of course the fact that IWW still exists attests also to its infiltration, like the infiltration of the US Communist Party or of the KKK or of the Black Block or of Antifa, by what today is called 'Deep State' but which I call 'DHS' (Department of Homeland Security), which is a part of the Deep State, I guess. After infiltration of any such group by "them" - as you say, One Tribe, we had best forget about any Left/Right, because it no longer matters, if it ever did.

    Anyway, anything 99% is obviously engaged in a battle for the Center, for populist control of the Center, which is why OCCUPY scared the crap out of the billionaire branch of the Deep State, to the extent that OCCUPY eventually came under the scrutiny and under attack by the Secret Government (secret because our government isn't supposed to be siding against and destroying any more-or-less successful populist political movement in the USA).

    You see, if you contest the very existence of a Left/Right divide, then you must be placing yourself in the Center and if you actually stir anything up there ... then you are a populist, a more-or-less successful populist, which is very threatening to just about any member of the global billionaire class, including for example, Kim Jong-un or Donald Trump or any of the Bushes. That's why Trump scared them all: he was too close to becoming a genuine populist leader, and that's why he is busying himself these days with showing that he can betray populism or the people right up there with the best of phonies, such as the Clintons.

    Anyway, thanks for the link to URBLURB. And you are correct to suggest that we dispense with the Left/Right divide, because we have no Center, we (USA) have been hollowed out.

    We are the hollow men
    We are the stuffed men
    Leaning together
    Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
    Our dried voices, when
    We whisper together
    Are quiet and meaningless
    As wind in dry grass
    Or rats' feet over broken glass
    In our dry cellar

    Shape without form, shade without colour,
    Paralysed force, gesture without motion;

    Those who have crossed
    With direct eyes, to death's other Kingdom
    Remember us-if at all-not as lost
    Violent souls, but only
    As the hollow men
    The stuffed men.

    -- from T. S. Eliot's The Hollow Men

    https://allpoetry.com/The-Hollow-Men
     
  30. Thomm says:
    @Johnny Smoggins
    "White Nationalists (who are also leftists.........."

    Could you qualify and quantify that statement?

    White nationalism isn't an economic philosophy so while I'm sure there are some WNs who may fall under the category of "leftist" it has no central bearing on what defines a White nationalist. I would also argue that the majority of WNs are more right leaning than left. Perhaps I'm wrong. Could you clarify what you meant?

    What percentage of WNs would you say, exactly, are leftists?

    All race nationalists tend to have economic views that are left-wing. They want tariffs, protectionism, and intra-white socialism.

    Hitler was left-wing. Nazi stood for ‘Nationalist Socialist’.
    The KKK was Democrat.
    Contemporary WNs have uniformaly left-wing economic views. This is not a secret.

    What percentage of WNs would you say, exactly, are leftists?

    The vast majority.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dc.sunsets
    Borders (which do tend to impede the free flow of goods, capital & people) are Left wing?

    That's a novel view.
    , @SMK
    So everyone who isn't an open-borders, free-market purist and monist who'd abolish the welfare-state is a "leftist" even if they're hated and censored and punished by the SJW/feminst/cultural Marxist/white-hating/black-racialist left for their views on non-and supra-economic issues such as racial and sexual differences and transformative nonwhite immigration.
  31. Logan says:
    @The Alarmist
    No, this is The Reign of Terror 2.0 ... As Robespierre himself once said

    "If the basis of popular government in peacetime is virtue, the basis of popular government during a revolution is both virtue and terror; virtue, without which terror is baneful; terror, without which virtue is powerless. Terror is nothing more than speedy, severe and inflexible justice; it is thus an emanation of virtue; it is less a principle in itself, than a consequence of the general principle of democracy, applied to the most pressing needs of the patrie."
     
    If it is any consolation, Robespierre was himself executed, and the Committee for Public Safety was, by popular demand, "reformed" and subsequently weakened.

    To be entirely fair to Rob (something which I’m not all that inclined to be), the French revolutionary regime faced a crisis far greater than anything any US government has ever faced. Foreign armies closing in from all sides, traitorous generals, inexperienced armies retreating without firing a shot, traitors in the government itself, etc.

    Don’t approve at all of the methods they used to deal with these threats, but that doesn’t mean the threats weren’t real. People can get remarkably vicious when cornered, and the Revolution was definitely cornered.

    Also, Rob was by no means the most vicious of the Terrorists. Some of those who were survived him and blackened his name in the interests of coveriing their own crimes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    "Foreign armies closing in from all sides, traitorous generals, inexperienced armies retreating without firing a shot, traitors in the government itself, etc."

    Sounds a lot like Iraq.
  32. @Miro23

    Rancourt describes the legal system, as something which must be ‘balanced’ in favour of common folk if the society is to survive at all … As Rancourt points out, when elites can continually ‘hack’ the legal-judicial framework to their selfish benefit, success can only be short-term, as the system itself begins to rock and sway toward break-up.
     
    And behind this there's Trust/Morality, which is the unspoken common ground that unites society in much more depth than legislation.

    Take away the trust, morality and free speech and you take away the engine's lubricant, the system overheats and heads towards breakup or at least runs very slowly and inefficiently. The Soviets had enormous problems in getting their low trust, exploitative command economy work.

    If anything, Americans became too trusting. They (we) were like marks lined up for fleecing by the legions of con artists represented on K-street.

    Read More
  33. @Thomm
    All race nationalists tend to have economic views that are left-wing. They want tariffs, protectionism, and intra-white socialism.

    Hitler was left-wing. Nazi stood for 'Nationalist Socialist'.
    The KKK was Democrat.
    Contemporary WNs have uniformaly left-wing economic views. This is not a secret.

    What percentage of WNs would you say, exactly, are leftists?

    The vast majority.

    Borders (which do tend to impede the free flow of goods, capital & people) are Left wing?

    That’s a novel view.

    Read More
  34. prusmc says:
    @Miro23

    The fact is that one of America’s two major political parties has become little more than a front group and mouthpiece for open Marxist revolution in this country, and that the MSM, despite its dishonest posturing that it is still “objective,” has become a weaponized Praetorian Guard for the most advanced, most violent and worst Communist, “antifa” and anarchist scum imaginable.
     
    The American Sodom and Gomorrah.

    Or taking Spain in 1936. Violent organized mobs of anarchists and republican left extremists burnt down hundreds of churches and other religious buildings in Madrid and other cities while the Republican (Bolshevik) national press cheered them on.

    Historian Stanley Payne put it this way in his even handed account "The Spanish Civil War" https://www.amazon.es/Spanish-Civil-Cambridge-Essential-Histories/dp/0521174708

    “…. Even though the authority of this government steadily declined, it would remain the key actor for the next five months, with responsibility for guiding the country and avoiding breakdown or civil war. It failed to meet these responsibilities because its priorities were, first, to maintain an exclusively all leftist government that rejected any compromise with the centre or moderate right, and second, to avoid any break with the revolutionaries, because their support was necessary to remain in power . The Republic’s first historian, the noted Catalan journalist Josep Pla, termed this strategy Azana’s “ideological Kerenskyism” referring to the Russian prime minister who also fell to the Bolsheviks.”

    The point seems to be that the government was not ready to compromise with traditional Spain and turned a blind eye to leftist violence.

    In American terms, Trump looks a lot like Calvo Sotelo, a powerless traditionalist surrounded by crazy counter cultural extremists - and for the record, Calvo-Sotelo was soon removed.

    Not one in a hundred US college graduates including History majors know who Calvo Sotelo was so a Calvo Sotelo moment is a non-starter. Unlike Spain, there is not a single institution which has a shred of loyality or influence toward traditional American values, ideals or goals. Who will be a potential Francisco Franco on the USSR todsy? Gen. Betrayous, Diversity George Casey, Admiral Howard, Martin Dempsey, Gary North, Mad Dog, Lover Boy Allen, Kelly etc. they’re all on the other side. Sadly so are the police and most sherrifs.

    Read More
  35. joef says:

    SJW, ANTIFA, BLM, SPLC are projecting their own hate.

    Then you have the limo liberal elites, who live in cupcake land, who feel better about themselves when they accuse the lower classes of whites of being racist, in order to appease their own feelings of white guilt.

    Then there is the ignorant millennials who have no idea what deplorable conditions white flight escaped from. Growing up in ignorance of this empirical experience, they instead were given MSM, and educational system, propaganda of an alternate liberal reality (formulated by elites who live in cupcake land).

    Then you have the BLM which obfuscates the issue with constant baseless accusations of racism, while afro americans themselves kill more of this nation’s residents than any other group, including terrorist.

    Finally you have our feckless politicians (which includes the corporatist republicans) who are willing to pay for never-ending extortion fees in the form of entitlements (so the afros will leave the elites alone). Once the debt ceiling is removed, this process will only be accelerated. It is disgusting that we will not fund the VA properly, but will provide parasitical white hating afros with as much welfare as we can give them.

    How long will this go on? Unfortunately it will continue until it cannot, because none of the above will reverse itself. Afros themselves are addicted to conflict with their host society, and are equally addicted to entitlements. But funding is finite and eventually things will start to break down, and more & more municipalities will start to resemble failed states.

    Afros who are firmly inculcated in the concept of a free lunch, will not understand when welfare can no longer be maintained. We are dealing with a group of people who do not understand what it takes to provide & maintain roads, bridges, running water, sanitation, electricity, food on the shelves, and gasoline in the tanks. When the scarcity begins then the rioting, raping, looting, and arson will become a semi chronic condition.

    Of course our leftist, and limo libs will think they are exempt from this afro entitlement rage, believing that they will be recognized as the “good white people”. What they will learn, the hard way, is that ghetto afros do not make such distinctions. Nor will they get much sympathy from the rest of us who know that they are the ones politically responsible for this national bring down.

    Leftist, and limo libs, being mostly physically helpless, and most dependent upon the protections of the city police, troopers, sheriffs, national guard, and military, will find the remaining forces (after severe govt spending cuts to keep the welfare state going) will not be too eager to protect the people responsible for their own persecution. This will set up conditions for the reality denying liberal (and their bad ideas) to eventually die off.
    [the avg liberal mindset constantly attempts to force reality to conform to their liberal opinions, and denial of reality is a very poor survival mechanism; thus without modern protections they will not last very long].

    Read More
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    If the pols are paying the afros to leave the elites alone, they're not getting good value for money.
  36. @Thomm
    SJWs are the dregs of humanity. White Nationalists (who are also leftists, albeit of a slightly different sort) are just as bad.

    Can you explain to us why “White Nationalism” is wrong? I think you are confusing White Nationalism with White Supremacism. Not that White Supremacism is wrong, since everyone already believes in it anyway. Whites because they realize that Whites have provided the majority of science and technology that has eliminated disease, provided food for the world, and made life more pleasant. Others because they realize they can’t live at a first world standard without Whites, with the possible exception of northeastern Orientals. I like something that the Oregon Muse posted on Ace of Spades.

    “Progressives think that America is the worst nation in the world, full of violence, racism, sexism, homophobia and Islamophobia and ruled by Literally Hitler in an orange fright wig. So why don’t they post warning signs on the border of this evil country and try to keep people out instead of inviting them all in?”

    Another of his cogent points stated:

    “What I want to know is, since when did American citizenship become a human right?”

    But, according to you, if we prevent those we don’t want to be here from becoming citizens we are White Nationalists, which, in your opinion, is beyond the pale of human behavior. Seems more like commonsense to me.

    Thomm, can you point to a White country that has allowed non-Whites in it that is better off for that mistake? And “diversity” is not an honest response, nor is “Everybody knows this is true!”. What have they brought to the table? Are there some races that are net negatives in maintaining the country they have been allowed to migrate to? And also, if the US collapses and forms different ethnic enclaves which then choose to allow citizenship only to Whites, will that be bad as well?

    Read More
    • Agree: SMK
    • Replies: @Clark Westwood

    Thomm, can you point to a White country that has allowed non-Whites in it that is better off for that mistake? And “diversity” is not an honest response, nor is “Everybody knows this is true!”. What have they brought to the table? Are there some races that are net negatives in maintaining the country they have been allowed to migrate to?
     
    I like this thought experiment as another way of getting at the same idea (I forget where I first came across this):

    Imagine you belong to the middle class (or whatever corresponds to the middle class) of some third-world country circa 1880. It doesn't matter what country -- it can be somewhere in Southeast Asia, South America, Africa, the South Pacific, wherever. Also imagine that you don't work for the existing government or depend on it in any direct way for your livelihood. Now imagine that you can choose any country in the world (including the country that we're imagining you live in) to "run" your country. Which one would you choose?

    The more I study history, the more certain I've become that I would want England to run my country. I think the Brits would do a better job than any other candidate.
  37. Led be Swecide. Sweden the Masochistic Superpower, as if to outdo rest of Europe.

    Read More
  38. Moi says:

    Mencken was right–no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people.

    Read More
  39. SMK says: • Website
    @Thomm
    SJWs are the dregs of humanity. White Nationalists (who are also leftists, albeit of a slightly different sort) are just as bad.

    So immigration restrictionists and white advocates and race-realists are “leftists” who are “just as bad” as SJW and cultural Marxists who seek to transform the U.S. into a nonwhite-majority country in which European-Americans are an increasingly dispossessed and persecuted minority.

    Read More
  40. RobinG says:
    @Logan
    To be entirely fair to Rob (something which I'm not all that inclined to be), the French revolutionary regime faced a crisis far greater than anything any US government has ever faced. Foreign armies closing in from all sides, traitorous generals, inexperienced armies retreating without firing a shot, traitors in the government itself, etc.

    Don't approve at all of the methods they used to deal with these threats, but that doesn't mean the threats weren't real. People can get remarkably vicious when cornered, and the Revolution was definitely cornered.

    Also, Rob was by no means the most vicious of the Terrorists. Some of those who were survived him and blackened his name in the interests of coveriing their own crimes.

    “Foreign armies closing in from all sides, traitorous generals, inexperienced armies retreating without firing a shot, traitors in the government itself, etc.”

    Sounds a lot like Iraq.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Logan
    Actually thought of that while typing in the response. But Iraq wasn't being invaded from every direction as France was. All of Europe essentially marched against France, and the Committee of Safety beat them. Quite a feat, actually.

    I think it's also fair to consider what would have happened in France had the forces of reaction defeated the Committee. There would without doubt have been massive repression and huge numbers of executions, including of many who had supported only the initial and moderate stages of the Revolution, such as, for instance, Lafayette.

    In all likelihood the White reaction would have killed more than the Red Revolution. As it did when the French national government crushed the Communards in 1871.

    Don't get me wrong. I'm not at all a fan of the French Revolution. But by that particular point in history, most of the common people were well aware that they could no longer go back to the mild authoritarianism of Louis XVI. They'd burned that bridge all the way down. Any restored monarchy would be savagely repressive and absolutist.

  41. @Anonymous White Male
    Can you explain to us why "White Nationalism" is wrong? I think you are confusing White Nationalism with White Supremacism. Not that White Supremacism is wrong, since everyone already believes in it anyway. Whites because they realize that Whites have provided the majority of science and technology that has eliminated disease, provided food for the world, and made life more pleasant. Others because they realize they can't live at a first world standard without Whites, with the possible exception of northeastern Orientals. I like something that the Oregon Muse posted on Ace of Spades.

    "Progressives think that America is the worst nation in the world, full of violence, racism, sexism, homophobia and Islamophobia and ruled by Literally Hitler in an orange fright wig. So why don't they post warning signs on the border of this evil country and try to keep people out instead of inviting them all in?"

    Another of his cogent points stated:

    "What I want to know is, since when did American citizenship become a human right?"

    But, according to you, if we prevent those we don't want to be here from becoming citizens we are White Nationalists, which, in your opinion, is beyond the pale of human behavior. Seems more like commonsense to me.

    Thomm, can you point to a White country that has allowed non-Whites in it that is better off for that mistake? And "diversity" is not an honest response, nor is "Everybody knows this is true!". What have they brought to the table? Are there some races that are net negatives in maintaining the country they have been allowed to migrate to? And also, if the US collapses and forms different ethnic enclaves which then choose to allow citizenship only to Whites, will that be bad as well?

    Thomm, can you point to a White country that has allowed non-Whites in it that is better off for that mistake? And “diversity” is not an honest response, nor is “Everybody knows this is true!”. What have they brought to the table? Are there some races that are net negatives in maintaining the country they have been allowed to migrate to?

    I like this thought experiment as another way of getting at the same idea (I forget where I first came across this):

    Imagine you belong to the middle class (or whatever corresponds to the middle class) of some third-world country circa 1880. It doesn’t matter what country — it can be somewhere in Southeast Asia, South America, Africa, the South Pacific, wherever. Also imagine that you don’t work for the existing government or depend on it in any direct way for your livelihood. Now imagine that you can choose any country in the world (including the country that we’re imagining you live in) to “run” your country. Which one would you choose?

    The more I study history, the more certain I’ve become that I would want England to run my country. I think the Brits would do a better job than any other candidate.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    I was in the Gambia a while ago and the vastly expressed preference was to have the Brits back.

    What I found really sad was the Christian graveyards full of hordes of Englishmen in their 20's.
  42. @Giuseppe

    a Leftist sociology professor at the University of Tampa, by name of Ken Storey, wrote via social media, that the folks in east Texas are getting what they deserved from Hurricane Harvey—because they voted for President Trump! He called it “karma.” Although he has since apologized (and been terminated)
     
    What Storey said was perfectly asinine but termination is absolutely ridiculous. People can't say stupid things, left or right, or offer an opinion that is sort of out there anymore. What is this, the Civil War?

    ” What is this, civil war”

    Yeah, guess what it IS “civil war” and it was started by them, and they won’t let up until either they or we are finally totally subdued.

    If one were to undertake a survey of party affiliation of people sitting in the waiting rooms of Psychiatrists, one would come to the not surprising result that 98% of them indentify as : Democrats.

    They SJW, anti-fa, etc, they are crazy and the longer they are not dealt with in this light the tougher it will be to stop the nation from dying.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army vet, and pro jazz musician.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Well said.

    ANTIFA = vegan ISIS.

    BLM = ISIS on crack
  43. @TG
    "The fact is that one of America’s two major political parties has become little more than a front group and mouthpiece for open Marxist revolution in this country"

    I must respectfully disagree. These 'Social Justice Warriors' are not mad - they are fools, they are gullible, they are chumps.

    They have been goaded into mindless actions which serve only to divide and conquer. They give cover for and provide a distraction to policies that the oligarchy favors, like open-borders cheap-labor immigration, wasting trillions of dollars on endless pointless winless wars on the other side of the planet while our own infrastructure crumbles, subsidizing speculative finance with trillions of dollars from the public treasury while starving main street of capital...

    The SJWs may talk Marxist, but they are useful idiots in the service of people like the Koch Brothers and the executives of Goldman Sachs and Bill Gates etc., and THESE people are very much NOT Marxist. Indeed, 'cultural Marxist' perhaps covers this - a Marxism concerned only with identity politics and old monuments - but the main force here is very much old-fashioned crony-capitalism kleptocracy.

    I respectfully submit that instead of falling into the trap of hating these SJWs - which would suit their backers just fine - we should pity them. If someone has been swindled we don't usually call them insane or mad, just gullible or foolish. These SJWs have allowed themselves to be brainwashed by media coverage and herd instinct into thinking that screaming their mindless hatred for Trump or old statues is somehow going to have anything to do with jobs or healthcare or peace. They have been tricked into acting against their own interests, and the oligarchs are quietly laughing at them over glasses of champagne. Perhaps treating them with pity, as fools who have been conned, rather than as a mindless incoherent enemy, could be the deeper insult, and perhaps - perhaps - could make at least some of them reconsider (I can dream), whereas sticking with an us-vs-them conflict will lead nowhere good...

    You have fallen into the trap of thinking that rich folks by virtue of the fact that they are in fact rich, cannot be Communists, and you are totally off base with this conclusion.
    On the contrary many of them are of the most rabid communistic mind-set, as paradoxical as it seems.

    Authenticjazzman ” Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz artist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    You are on the mark as usual. Many of the rich communist believe that they will remain the future power brokers, while they socially engineer the rest of us into acceptable behavior.

    What else is paradoxical is they claim to love mankind but lack empathy in interpersonal direct human contact. It is easy to love mankind from afar, and that is why they hate charity, because they are mostly incapable of it (just as they hate empirical experience, and call it anecdotal, is because they are lacking in it).

    However American communist (SJW, ANTIFA etc) are not like communist of other nations. They are not tough, prefering battles where the other side is not allowed to fight back. They hope that they can manipulate ghetto afros into doing their physical fighting for them, but that is not certain.

    The problems with this are: ghetto afros like easy targets (with some exceptions they are generally not hard fighters, however they do have the capacity for casual use of extreme violence), and are unwilling to sacrifice for the larger communist cause. Instead they are just interested in their ability to coerce unearned material gain from the nation.

    Also whitey hating afros do not make distinctions between good white people and bad white people, as naive libs want to believe. So it is doubtful that ghetto afros would remain loyal allies with whites who have communist ambitions.

  44. SMK says: • Website
    @Thomm
    All race nationalists tend to have economic views that are left-wing. They want tariffs, protectionism, and intra-white socialism.

    Hitler was left-wing. Nazi stood for 'Nationalist Socialist'.
    The KKK was Democrat.
    Contemporary WNs have uniformaly left-wing economic views. This is not a secret.

    What percentage of WNs would you say, exactly, are leftists?

    The vast majority.

    So everyone who isn’t an open-borders, free-market purist and monist who’d abolish the welfare-state is a “leftist” even if they’re hated and censored and punished by the SJW/feminst/cultural Marxist/white-hating/black-racialist left for their views on non-and supra-economic issues such as racial and sexual differences and transformative nonwhite immigration.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Where is the SJW outrage at the strict Israeli immigration laws which specify JEWS ONLY, while Zionist Jews demand massive 3rd world immigration into the US & Europe?
    , @Thomm
    So everyone who isn’t an open-borders, free-market purist and monist who’d abolish the welfare-state is a “leftist” even if they’re hated and censored and punished by the SJW/feminst/cultural Marxist/white-hating/black-racialist left

    Yes. There is more than one type of leftist. Hitler fought Stalin, you know.

    Anything that is not free-market/small government is leftist. White Nationalist-Leftists are particularly left-wing, given their love of tariffs and intra-white socialism*.

    *WN is really just untalented, bottom-tenth white males who want the resources of successful whites (like myself) to be shared with them, based on nothing other than shared ancestry from Europe centuries ago.

    Remember that white variance is very high, which is why there is such a huge gap between talented whites and WN losers.
  45. @fnn
    How do you define leftism? Anything other than pure laissez-faire capitalism? By that standard, all the major powers of WW2 (NS Germany, USSR and New Deal America ) were leftist-making fleeing to Mexico as a draft evader the best option.

    How do you define leftism? Anything other than pure laissez-faire capitalism? By that standard, all the major powers of WW2 (NS Germany, USSR and New Deal America ) were leftist-making fleeing to Mexico as a draft evader the best option.

    Yes, unfortunately “Marxist” has no more meaning these days than “Nazi”. Mr. Obama was the most corporate-friendly president in history, privatizing all sorts of things, ramping up the military, and giving our national healthcare to rapacious thieves and profiteers. Obama himself recognized that he is a 1980′s republican. Yet, the fringe right continues to maintain that he is a Marxist, and that everyone who votes Democratic is as well. Beyond hyperbole and well into fantasyland.

    ETA: I have made unz a daily read for a couple months now because preposterous hyperbole and name-calling are generally absent – almost all of the content is very smart and well-reasoned. I’ll need to take Mr. Cathey off of my read list.

    Read More
  46. RobinG says:

    Berkeley teacher Yvette Felarca arrested on charges of inciting a riot

    http://www.berkeleyside.com/2017/07/19/berkeley-middle-school-teacher-yvette-felarca-arrested-charges-inciting-riot/

    “Felarca was captured on video hitting a member of the Traditionalist Worker’s Party, a white nationalist group that had taken out permits for a rally on the west steps of the state capitol. Felarca, a member of the group By Any Means Necessary, and other counter-protesters blocked the rally by chasing and hitting members of the Traditional Worker’s Party. At least 10 people suffered stab wounds and lacerations in the melee.”

    Read More
  47. c matt says:

    So what does Mr. Storey think of Irma?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Hurricane Irma Is NOT the Most Powerful Atlantic Hurricane Ever Recorded.

    The last two serious hurricanes are the first ones in FOURTEEN YEARS.

    Hurricanes are not increasing in severity.

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/09/07/hurricane-irma-is-not-the-most-powerful-atlantic-hurricane-ever-recorded/
  48. Logan says:
    @RobinG
    "Foreign armies closing in from all sides, traitorous generals, inexperienced armies retreating without firing a shot, traitors in the government itself, etc."

    Sounds a lot like Iraq.

    Actually thought of that while typing in the response. But Iraq wasn’t being invaded from every direction as France was. All of Europe essentially marched against France, and the Committee of Safety beat them. Quite a feat, actually.

    I think it’s also fair to consider what would have happened in France had the forces of reaction defeated the Committee. There would without doubt have been massive repression and huge numbers of executions, including of many who had supported only the initial and moderate stages of the Revolution, such as, for instance, Lafayette.

    In all likelihood the White reaction would have killed more than the Red Revolution. As it did when the French national government crushed the Communards in 1871.

    Don’t get me wrong. I’m not at all a fan of the French Revolution. But by that particular point in history, most of the common people were well aware that they could no longer go back to the mild authoritarianism of Louis XVI. They’d burned that bridge all the way down. Any restored monarchy would be savagely repressive and absolutist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    Has anybody put together a list of examples where the absolute freedom of the people was better after than before?
  49. @One Tribe
    originally published at https://urblurb.wordpress.com/2017/09/03/get-over-the-political-left-to-right-divide/

    Get Over the Political Left to Right Divide
     
    2017 September 3rd

    It is definitely time to leave the old political characterizations of “Left” and “Right” behind.

    While one must be careful endorsing any large organizational entities, Wiki has an entry for “Left-Right political spectrum“. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left%E2%80%93right_political_spectrum

    While there may (?!) have been usefulness of this kind of binary differentiation in political discussions, these days, all it does is artificially fosters divisions within the 99%, further enabling the 0.1% to retain control above the inane din below.

    If you were to boil down the actual differences between these supposed ideologies, you might find, as I did, that ‘the left’ purports to in inherent, intrinsic level of responsibility, while ‘the right’ seems to support an attitude that if you paid for it, your responsibility is complete. Of course this is great simplification of the supposed spectrum (you could just as easily read ‘rectum‘), try it out for a while, and see what you think.

    The only real true divide in society is the top 0.1%-1% and the 99%, and this, of course, is in and of itself, a spectrum. But there is a significant difference between competing factions in the top 0.1% and everybody else, their defacto ‘jobs’ are maintaining the status quo for wealth/power divisions, in which they reign, versus the 99%, who are trying to make the most of what (little) they get.

    The artificial political divide maintained for the elite 0.1%, by their top 0.9% toadies is wearing thin after Charlottesville, and the Hillary Clinton Democratic National Committee cheat to win the Democrat nomination, then having been exposed by a leak, creating a full onslaught of fake Russia involvement news.

    So the two groups are: a. those that work towards maintaining their unreasonable control of power and wealth, and b. those that would like for a more equitable distribution of power and wealth, which needless to say, would comparatively favour them. There is a group c. the bottom 9/10ths of the top 1% (approximately) who vary across a range of i. being grateful for their existing level of wealth power, in the service of their masters in the top 0.1%, and willing to do whatever it takes to not slip into the bottom 99%, and ii. desiring to be in the top 0.1% and willing to do whatever it takes to get there.


    Recommendation:


    If you are in the 99%, better to let go of the left v. right divide and focus on addressing the dysfunctional distribution of wealth/power. The other differences between people in the 99% are less relevant until a better distribution of wealth/power is achieved.

    According to a website obviously not reliable on the subject, the SPLC … but still there must be something to this and I make use of it only as a hypothetical:

    “In the first years of the 21st century, Cathey aided an extremist takeover attempt aimed at the Sons of Confederate Veterans, a Southern heritage group.”

    Here the Left-Right relativistic thing may be meaningful, if we would describe the SCV as in the “Center”. So there is a point, One Tribe, to your critique of the Left-Right spectrum, namely that you leave out the Center. I mean, if you think about it, you can’t have Left/Right without Center. That’s why Left/Right today seems to be a useless concept, because we have no Center, because our USA has been hollowed out.

    The Center might be like the middle squares of a chessboard — so in theory, up for grabs at all times – still the Center is of enormous strategic interest. Sometimes the Center is vacant except for a million mines — like the DMZ in Korea. Sometimes the Center looks to be hard-fought a USSR under Stalin or in North Korea under Kim Jong-un.

    Now, your 99% harks back to the days of OCCUPY and that harked back to the “Wobblies” or Industrial Workers of the World, which still exists today even though USA is indeed “post-industrial” or maybe “post-industrialized” (like “globalized”). The fact that IWW still exists attests to a few hardy souls who go beyond “true believers” to become an embattled few who refuse to come in out of the cold … and of course the fact that IWW still exists attests also to its infiltration, like the infiltration of the US Communist Party or of the KKK or of the Black Block or of Antifa, by what today is called ‘Deep State’ but which I call ‘DHS’ (Department of Homeland Security), which is a part of the Deep State, I guess. After infiltration of any such group by “them” – as you say, One Tribe, we had best forget about any Left/Right, because it no longer matters, if it ever did.

    Anyway, anything 99% is obviously engaged in a battle for the Center, for populist control of the Center, which is why OCCUPY scared the crap out of the billionaire branch of the Deep State, to the extent that OCCUPY eventually came under the scrutiny and under attack by the Secret Government (secret because our government isn’t supposed to be siding against and destroying any more-or-less successful populist political movement in the USA).

    You see, if you contest the very existence of a Left/Right divide, then you must be placing yourself in the Center and if you actually stir anything up there … then you are a populist, a more-or-less successful populist, which is very threatening to just about any member of the global billionaire class, including for example, Kim Jong-un or Donald Trump or any of the Bushes. That’s why Trump scared them all: he was too close to becoming a genuine populist leader, and that’s why he is busying himself these days with showing that he can betray populism or the people right up there with the best of phonies, such as the Clintons.

    Anyway, thanks for the link to URBLURB. And you are correct to suggest that we dispense with the Left/Right divide, because we have no Center, we (USA) have been hollowed out.

    [MORE]

    We are the hollow men
    We are the stuffed men
    Leaning together
    Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
    Our dried voices, when
    We whisper together
    Are quiet and meaningless
    As wind in dry grass
    Or rats’ feet over broken glass
    In our dry cellar

    Shape without form, shade without colour,
    Paralysed force, gesture without motion;

    Those who have crossed
    With direct eyes, to death’s other Kingdom
    Remember us-if at all-not as lost
    Violent souls, but only
    As the hollow men
    The stuffed men.

    — from T. S. Eliot’s The Hollow Men

    https://allpoetry.com/The-Hollow-Men

    Read More
    • Replies: @One Tribe
    Chuck:

    Thanks for all the thought and consideration, obvious in your reply to my comment.

    While I totally agree that the middle class has been hollowed out, I think that you are closer to the facts (that we may never know), with your "...infiltration..." observations.

    When almost all of the people are so stressed out financially, it is so easy to buy them off, and infiltrate any 'benevolent' organization/social movement.

    We, especially in the U.S.A. (from what I can see from my nearby perspective), but now everywhere, as this culture has successfully been 'exported' to western Europe, live in a culture where zero sum gain and negative sum gain gaming the system is held in the highest esteem, even when it threatens to wipe out the planet!

    The advent of this new, incredibly powerful perception management capability (greatly enhanced by the internet/handheld interface technological pervasiveness), has resulted in people not paying almost any attention to what is occurring in the 'real' world, and putting more weight of 'reality' into the digitally moderated world.
    Obviously this is really, really problematic for the well-being 99% (where it is conflict with the insatiability of the 0.1% power-mongering faction sociopaths; which is always, from a socio-pathic perspective).

    The question is:

    What can be done?
     
    I'd enjoy reading your ruminations on that.
    , @Grandpa Charlie
    Ooops! Sometimes my fingers slip on the keyboard/trackpad ... so when I read over my comment, I discovered this:

    "sometimes the Center is vacant except for a million mines — like the DMZ in Korea. Sometimes the Center looks to be hard-fought a USSR under Stalin or in North Korea under Kim Jong-un."

    WTF happened there? No, the center under Stalin or Kim Jong-un ... there's no contesting it at all, unless on pain of death or worse.

    WHAT I MEANT TO TYPE WAS SOMETHING LIKE THIS:

    Sometimes the Center looks to be hard-fought: a battleground like Gettysburg. And sometimes the Center is a monolithic mass: a USSR under Stalin or North Korea under Kim Jong -un."
  50. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    This madness is too well organized and funded to be just madness. Individual morons on the street might believe that they are fighting for social justice, but no one with an IQ greater than 80 looking at the events in the US in the last months can possibly believe that. First, the pretext was women’s rights. There were huge demonstrations with vagina outfits, which later fizzled out. Ask yourself, how many people have that kind of costumes in their closets? So, someone invested quite a bit into these “protests”. Next pretext: confederacy and racism. The monuments to confederate figures stood for close to a hundred years and caused no violence. All of a sudden there are street battles about them. Real battles with real casualties. Even though General Lee did not own slaves, whereas Washington, Jefferson, and the majority of the founding fathers did. Neither logic nor social justice has anything to do with it. This is an orchestrated campaign by the globalist thieves who invested into corrupt old hag and lost. They won’t stop voluntarily. When this particular flavor of madness fizzles out, they are going to come up with a new pretext. They are defending their ill-gotten riches, after all. There is no crime they won’t stoop to in order to protect their ability to steal even more. The people should realize that this is worse than color revolution coming home. This won’t end unless globalist elites are defeated and destroyed.

    Read More
  51. MBlanc46 says:

    The Repubs are the flunkies of transnational finance capital. They care nothing about historic Western values.

    Read More
  52. Sam Francis’ described our current Anarcho-Tyranny better than any other. It’s unimaginable that white Americans would be allowed to behave as the Africans and the mindless Marxist zombies – we would be set upon by national guard troops immediately. The only place in America that I’ve seen shut down African mobs is Fort Lauderdale. Miami contains them during African beech week as does Daytona during African spring break, but Fort Lauderdale simply squashes them. I’ve seen no other city in America even come close.

    As for this ex-”Professor” in Tampa … perhaps Irma will find him next week. Or Jose the following week. There will be many drowned rats in Florida, let’s hope for one more.

    Read More
    • Replies: @David In TN
    I recall a column by Samuel Francis of twenty-some years ago. He wrote that "liberal compassion" doesn't extend to white victims of black crime.

    Christopher Lasch wrote years ago that the upper class (white) liberal wears a mask of "smiling benevolence" while underneath has a "venomous hatred" for working and lower middle class white people.
  53. MBlanc46 says:
    @Giuseppe

    a Leftist sociology professor at the University of Tampa, by name of Ken Storey, wrote via social media, that the folks in east Texas are getting what they deserved from Hurricane Harvey—because they voted for President Trump! He called it “karma.” Although he has since apologized (and been terminated)
     
    What Storey said was perfectly asinine but termination is absolutely ridiculous. People can't say stupid things, left or right, or offer an opinion that is sort of out there anymore. What is this, the Civil War?

    “What is this, the Civil War?”

    It’s a cold civil war, so far, but it’s heating up.

    Read More
  54. MBlanc46 says:
    @Zoodles
    Mainstream conservatives are concerned with their position and social status. They dont want to win. They just want to enjoy their perks. They are perfectly happy being controlled opposition as long as they can keep their jobs at prestigious thinktanks and magazines and be able to hobnob with the Good People.

    The energies powering the alt-right are enormous, and these energies are growing. Properly harnessed, those energies are strong enough to overthrow the Social JustISIS scum. But Conservatism inc. doesn't see the energies powering the so-called alt-right as a potential vanguard, they see it as a threat to their position. They would prefer to lose to the left and hold onto their scraps of social status than win and potentially lose their place as the big fish in their tiny pond. They are too stupid to understand that they will no longer be needed at all if the left finally wins.

    And so those energies will be harnessed by a much more radical and nihilistic group of people who do not care what the New York Times thinks and has a vested interest in burning everything to the ground.

    Corporate conservatives are bankrolled by the same folks who bankroll the Left: the transnational business class.

    Read More
  55. @Priss Factor
    Led be Swecide. Sweden the Masochistic Superpower, as if to outdo rest of Europe.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydPZRoLzu-E

    Who is the man in the video you posted?

    Read More
  56. joef says:
    @Authenticjazzman
    You have fallen into the trap of thinking that rich folks by virtue of the fact that they are in fact rich, cannot be Communists, and you are totally off base with this conclusion.
    On the contrary many of them are of the most rabid communistic mind-set, as paradoxical as it seems.

    Authenticjazzman " Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz artist.

    You are on the mark as usual. Many of the rich communist believe that they will remain the future power brokers, while they socially engineer the rest of us into acceptable behavior.

    What else is paradoxical is they claim to love mankind but lack empathy in interpersonal direct human contact. It is easy to love mankind from afar, and that is why they hate charity, because they are mostly incapable of it (just as they hate empirical experience, and call it anecdotal, is because they are lacking in it).

    However American communist (SJW, ANTIFA etc) are not like communist of other nations. They are not tough, prefering battles where the other side is not allowed to fight back. They hope that they can manipulate ghetto afros into doing their physical fighting for them, but that is not certain.

    The problems with this are: ghetto afros like easy targets (with some exceptions they are generally not hard fighters, however they do have the capacity for casual use of extreme violence), and are unwilling to sacrifice for the larger communist cause. Instead they are just interested in their ability to coerce unearned material gain from the nation.

    Also whitey hating afros do not make distinctions between good white people and bad white people, as naive libs want to believe. So it is doubtful that ghetto afros would remain loyal allies with whites who have communist ambitions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    " you are on the mark as usual"

    Mercy bow coupe.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz musician.

  57. anon says: • Disclaimer

    About this immense and unprecedented natural disaster

    It was hardly unprecedented. Houston floods all the time.
    This is a history of significant Houston floods:

    http://www.wxresearch.com/almanac/houflood.html

    http://www.rms.com/publications/natural-catastrophes

    Read More
  58. SMK says: • Website
    @Giuseppe

    a Leftist sociology professor at the University of Tampa, by name of Ken Storey, wrote via social media, that the folks in east Texas are getting what they deserved from Hurricane Harvey—because they voted for President Trump! He called it “karma.” Although he has since apologized (and been terminated)
     
    What Storey said was perfectly asinine but termination is absolutely ridiculous. People can't say stupid things, left or right, or offer an opinion that is sort of out there anymore. What is this, the Civil War?

    “People can’t say stupid things, left or right, or offer an opinion that is sort of out there anymore.”

    The only reason this scum was fired is because he didn’t have tenure and because his comments were preternaturally vile and outrageous. He was extolling the immiseration, homelessness, devastation, impoverishment, and deaths of million of people because they voted for Trump. Tenured professors can say anything that isn’t subject to criminal and/or civil penalties, however false, demonstrably so, absurd, psychotic, deranged, outrageous, etc. Many aren’t even fired for explicitly calling for violence against groups and individuals.

    What percentage of tenured professors are left-liberals, and what percentage are cultural Marxists, communists, white-hating black racialists, doctrinaire feminists, SJW, La Raza revanchists, antifa sympathizers, ad nauseam?

    How many tenured professors are race-realists, white advocates, and immigration restrictionists who oppose an invasion of Third-Word legal and illegal aliens for explicitly racial and pro-white reasons -and, in respect to Muslims, also religious/cultural reasons? And even if there are any such professors, and even if they can’t be fired to stating the facts and noting the obvious and telling the truth and living in the real world, they’d be compelled to quit their jobs so as not to be the victims of constant harassment, threats of violence, serious violence, and perhaps even murder.

    Read More
  59. Randal says:
    @Giuseppe

    a Leftist sociology professor at the University of Tampa, by name of Ken Storey, wrote via social media, that the folks in east Texas are getting what they deserved from Hurricane Harvey—because they voted for President Trump! He called it “karma.” Although he has since apologized (and been terminated)
     
    What Storey said was perfectly asinine but termination is absolutely ridiculous. People can't say stupid things, left or right, or offer an opinion that is sort of out there anymore. What is this, the Civil War?

    What Storey said was perfectly asinine but termination is absolutely ridiculous. People can’t say stupid things, left or right, or offer an opinion that is sort of out there anymore.

    That was my first thought on reading that anecdote, as well. It’s encouraging to see I’m not alone in that as I rather feared I would be.

    That said, it’s difficult not to see the leftists, for a change, suffering from this kind of thing as being poetic justice, at least, and quite possibly the only way to slowly bring home to some, at least, of them the real stupidity of their repressive attitudes.

    Read More
  60. yeah says:

    I don’t know if God is punishing East Texas for its “wickedness” in voting Trump, but I am fully convinced the Almighty has definitely punished this loony left-wing professor: Firstly, by creating him with a defect in his brainbox (a case of being born stupid); secondly, by placing him in an environment (of left-wing fluffy academics) where “he hath greatly added to his natural stock” by having copious amounts of stupidity constantly thrust into him; and lastly, by now throwing him on the heap of the unemployed. This last may well be an Act of Mercy (the ways of the Lord are mysterious), for nothing drives out stupidity and sloth better than driving taxis or delivering pizzas.
    (I got carried away and retract: I do not condone employers firing people for their views, however offensive to some they might be).

    Read More
  61. Wally says:
    @c matt
    So what does Mr. Storey think of Irma?

    Hurricane Irma Is NOT the Most Powerful Atlantic Hurricane Ever Recorded.

    The last two serious hurricanes are the first ones in FOURTEEN YEARS.

    Hurricanes are not increasing in severity.

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/09/07/hurricane-irma-is-not-the-most-powerful-atlantic-hurricane-ever-recorded/

    Read More
  62. Wally says:
    @SMK
    So everyone who isn't an open-borders, free-market purist and monist who'd abolish the welfare-state is a "leftist" even if they're hated and censored and punished by the SJW/feminst/cultural Marxist/white-hating/black-racialist left for their views on non-and supra-economic issues such as racial and sexual differences and transformative nonwhite immigration.

    Where is the SJW outrage at the strict Israeli immigration laws which specify JEWS ONLY, while Zionist Jews demand massive 3rd world immigration into the US & Europe?

    Read More
  63. Wally says:
    @Authenticjazzman
    " What is this, civil war"

    Yeah, guess what it IS "civil war" and it was started by them, and they won't let up until either they or we are finally totally subdued.

    If one were to undertake a survey of party affiliation of people sitting in the waiting rooms of Psychiatrists, one would come to the not surprising result that 98% of them indentify as : Democrats.

    They SJW, anti-fa, etc, they are crazy and the longer they are not dealt with in this light the tougher it will be to stop the nation from dying.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army vet, and pro jazz musician.

    Well said.

    ANTIFA = vegan ISIS.

    BLM = ISIS on crack

    Read More
  64. Thomm says:
    @SMK
    So everyone who isn't an open-borders, free-market purist and monist who'd abolish the welfare-state is a "leftist" even if they're hated and censored and punished by the SJW/feminst/cultural Marxist/white-hating/black-racialist left for their views on non-and supra-economic issues such as racial and sexual differences and transformative nonwhite immigration.

    So everyone who isn’t an open-borders, free-market purist and monist who’d abolish the welfare-state is a “leftist” even if they’re hated and censored and punished by the SJW/feminst/cultural Marxist/white-hating/black-racialist left

    Yes. There is more than one type of leftist. Hitler fought Stalin, you know.

    Anything that is not free-market/small government is leftist. White Nationalist-Leftists are particularly left-wing, given their love of tariffs and intra-white socialism*.

    *WN is really just untalented, bottom-tenth white males who want the resources of successful whites (like myself) to be shared with them, based on nothing other than shared ancestry from Europe centuries ago.

    Remember that white variance is very high, which is why there is such a huge gap between talented whites and WN losers.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark Presco
    Thomm, You have never adequately defined who you are and what your political position is. All you do is engage in immature name calling and sniping. To me you sound like a young naïve libertarian who is a true believer in the new religion of anti-racism. Like the fascist antifa, who call the alt-right fascist to try to discredit us, you are just as dishonest to call us leftists. Let me try to educate you in the error of your ways.

    It is my belief that the kind of libertarianism I think you promote exists only in this country. It was created by the independent, self-reliant pioneers that settled this country. Only white people with this particular aptitude demonstrate the necessary individual responsibility to make your kind of libertarianism work.

    Unfortunately, most white women don’t have this quality. Being more social and collectivist, they are using the franchise to move this country to the left by creating the nanny state. Women are using democracy to transfer financial responsibility for women and children from some beta male provider to the taxpayer. This is a very good deal for these women. They don’t have to have sex with the guy, cook for the guy, clean up after the guy or be inconvenienced by the guy in any way, shape or form. They just vote themselves the right to reach into the pockets of every man in this country and take what they want. They have voted themselves a license to steal.

    Most people of color are tribal collectivists who think the tribe should provide. They are two orders of magnitude worse than white women. So you see, your kind of libertarianism cannot survive in a democracy in the politically correct environment you promote. The parasites will seize control, run your life and steal you blind.

    I have defined myself as a libertarian in all but immigration policy. Dealing with white parasites is hard enough, dealing with a large population of non-white parasites is impossible in a democracy. Just ask the Venezuelans.

    How many non-white-males fit your definition of libertarian?

    http://www.salon.com/2015/06/10/why_libertarianism_is_so_popular_on_the_right_its_the_last_bastion_of_white_male_dominance/
  65. Thomm says:
    @Anon
    http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/09/08/jennifer-lawrence-says-hurricanes-may-be-natures-wrath-for-trump-victory.html

    Another neo-Sodomism. Jennifer Lawrence says 'nature' punishes Texans for the election of Trump.

    Lawrence is a good illustration of why 'white' culture fails. Ashley Judd too.

    While many white communities tend to be 'conservative', they have no ideas and no culture of the mind/critique. So, when these bimbos go to Hollywood or some urban place, their empty minds become filled with Official Ideology associated with power and privilege. They are really conforming to Privilege but fooled into thinking it's about 'equality' and 'justice'. People who wanna rise above the rest pretend to stand up for the rest... or at least minorities and illegals.

    Lawrence is a good illustration of why ‘white’ culture fails. Ashley Judd too.

    Yes. White women, even the pretty ones, have zero race loyalty. Yet since WN is a goddess cult, the WN loser males will still worship a white woman no matter how much she is opposed to WN.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Harold
    White women have higher same-race preference in dating than white men.
  66. MBlanc46 says:
    @joef
    SJW, ANTIFA, BLM, SPLC are projecting their own hate.

    Then you have the limo liberal elites, who live in cupcake land, who feel better about themselves when they accuse the lower classes of whites of being racist, in order to appease their own feelings of white guilt.

    Then there is the ignorant millennials who have no idea what deplorable conditions white flight escaped from. Growing up in ignorance of this empirical experience, they instead were given MSM, and educational system, propaganda of an alternate liberal reality (formulated by elites who live in cupcake land).

    Then you have the BLM which obfuscates the issue with constant baseless accusations of racism, while afro americans themselves kill more of this nation’s residents than any other group, including terrorist.

    Finally you have our feckless politicians (which includes the corporatist republicans) who are willing to pay for never-ending extortion fees in the form of entitlements (so the afros will leave the elites alone). Once the debt ceiling is removed, this process will only be accelerated. It is disgusting that we will not fund the VA properly, but will provide parasitical white hating afros with as much welfare as we can give them.

    How long will this go on? Unfortunately it will continue until it cannot, because none of the above will reverse itself. Afros themselves are addicted to conflict with their host society, and are equally addicted to entitlements. But funding is finite and eventually things will start to break down, and more & more municipalities will start to resemble failed states.

    Afros who are firmly inculcated in the concept of a free lunch, will not understand when welfare can no longer be maintained. We are dealing with a group of people who do not understand what it takes to provide & maintain roads, bridges, running water, sanitation, electricity, food on the shelves, and gasoline in the tanks. When the scarcity begins then the rioting, raping, looting, and arson will become a semi chronic condition.

    Of course our leftist, and limo libs will think they are exempt from this afro entitlement rage, believing that they will be recognized as the “good white people”. What they will learn, the hard way, is that ghetto afros do not make such distinctions. Nor will they get much sympathy from the rest of us who know that they are the ones politically responsible for this national bring down.

    Leftist, and limo libs, being mostly physically helpless, and most dependent upon the protections of the city police, troopers, sheriffs, national guard, and military, will find the remaining forces (after severe govt spending cuts to keep the welfare state going) will not be too eager to protect the people responsible for their own persecution. This will set up conditions for the reality denying liberal (and their bad ideas) to eventually die off.
    [the avg liberal mindset constantly attempts to force reality to conform to their liberal opinions, and denial of reality is a very poor survival mechanism; thus without modern protections they will not last very long].

    If the pols are paying the afros to leave the elites alone, they’re not getting good value for money.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    What can I say: liberalism is a mental disorder that denies reality, so they will always attempt to appease the unappeasable afro ghetto dweller, and then point to a success that isn't there.
  67. Mark Presco says: • Website
    @Thomm
    So everyone who isn’t an open-borders, free-market purist and monist who’d abolish the welfare-state is a “leftist” even if they’re hated and censored and punished by the SJW/feminst/cultural Marxist/white-hating/black-racialist left

    Yes. There is more than one type of leftist. Hitler fought Stalin, you know.

    Anything that is not free-market/small government is leftist. White Nationalist-Leftists are particularly left-wing, given their love of tariffs and intra-white socialism*.

    *WN is really just untalented, bottom-tenth white males who want the resources of successful whites (like myself) to be shared with them, based on nothing other than shared ancestry from Europe centuries ago.

    Remember that white variance is very high, which is why there is such a huge gap between talented whites and WN losers.

    Thomm, You have never adequately defined who you are and what your political position is. All you do is engage in immature name calling and sniping. To me you sound like a young naïve libertarian who is a true believer in the new religion of anti-racism. Like the fascist antifa, who call the alt-right fascist to try to discredit us, you are just as dishonest to call us leftists. Let me try to educate you in the error of your ways.

    It is my belief that the kind of libertarianism I think you promote exists only in this country. It was created by the independent, self-reliant pioneers that settled this country. Only white people with this particular aptitude demonstrate the necessary individual responsibility to make your kind of libertarianism work.

    Unfortunately, most white women don’t have this quality. Being more social and collectivist, they are using the franchise to move this country to the left by creating the nanny state. Women are using democracy to transfer financial responsibility for women and children from some beta male provider to the taxpayer. This is a very good deal for these women. They don’t have to have sex with the guy, cook for the guy, clean up after the guy or be inconvenienced by the guy in any way, shape or form. They just vote themselves the right to reach into the pockets of every man in this country and take what they want. They have voted themselves a license to steal.

    Most people of color are tribal collectivists who think the tribe should provide. They are two orders of magnitude worse than white women. So you see, your kind of libertarianism cannot survive in a democracy in the politically correct environment you promote. The parasites will seize control, run your life and steal you blind.

    I have defined myself as a libertarian in all but immigration policy. Dealing with white parasites is hard enough, dealing with a large population of non-white parasites is impossible in a democracy. Just ask the Venezuelans.

    How many non-white-males fit your definition of libertarian?

    http://www.salon.com/2015/06/10/why_libertarianism_is_so_popular_on_the_right_its_the_last_bastion_of_white_male_dominance/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm
    I have been over this many times over here, so you will have to dig up my prior comments.

    In summary :

    1) White variance is extremely high. A WN loser has no more in common with a talented, successful white than a chihuahua has with a German Shepherd.

    Median white success tells us nothing. The two groups have to be split out. Hence, the real hierarchy of brains/talent/looks/character is :

    Successful whites
    Asians (East and South)
    Hispanics
    Blacks
    WNs

    2) Untalented people tend to be socialists and devise various rationalizations for why the property of talented people should be redistributed towards them. WNs are no different, because they want intra-white socialism.

    They are two orders of magnitude worse than white women.
     
    If you are *that* delusional, you deserve what you are getting. Thanks for reminding us that WN is a goddess cult.

    Libertarianism (or equivalent small-govt ideology) is the most fair and most just. WNs fare poorly under meritocracy, so they oppose it.
    , @KenH

    Thomm, You have never adequately defined who you are and what your political position is. All you do is engage in immature name calling and sniping.
     
    I see you have become acquainted with Thomm the turd burgler and troll. You are right as there is almost never any data or cogency to his arguments and claims. Just baseless ad hominem attacks.

    He loves Indians (the red dot variety from India) and thinks they're the smartest people to ever grace planet earth but he can't explain why India remains stuck in 3rd world status or why their best and brightest want to leave for America and other white nations. Yet he claims to be a "a white male from the great lakes area" when pressed about his racial and ethnic lineage.

    He's the only white man I'm aware of who worships India and Indians.

  68. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Stephen Paul Foster
    "By far it is worse and more dangerous than the challenge of an old-fashioned stodgy Soviet Communism..." Absolutely, today's SJWs by comparison make Brezhnev and his gang look like benevolent avuncular types straight out of Norman Rockwell. Even more horrifying is to see the likes of Mitt Romney defending them.

    See: http://fosterspeak.blogspot.com/2017/09/words-weapons-and-rituals-of-left-and.html

    Romney is and has always been a scumbag. Like McCain. And Ryan.

    Read More
  69. jack ryan says: • Website

    Desperate to find an American Christian church which hadn’t embraced the worst forms of Feminism, cultural marxism, sexual degeneracy or worse, no sexual anything, I joined the Mormon LDS Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Lots and lots of nice folks, good looking wives, children – LDS Mormons make for good neighbors.

    Unfortunately, LDS Mormon pols like Orin Hatch, Mittens Romney and that “Mcfuffin” guy William Kristol and the J Neo Cons recruited to stop President Trump – they suck, as bad as the most pathetic, SJW liberals.

    These LDS Mormon cuckservatives just go with the idea that they should dress neat and agree with whomever happens to be in the room with them at the time. The Original LDS Mormons were kind of rowdy and rebellious – the prophet Joseph Smith and in particular his main body guard Porter Rockwell did lots of things we’d all like to do – get in to fist fights, gun fights – burn down abusive press buildings. The LDS Mormons got persecuted, Missouri Governor Boggs issued an “Extermination order” against the LDS Mormons – but these tough pioneers didn’t give up they did a wagon train relocate to the Pacific Northwest – wouldn’t lots of us like to do that now?

    I’ve met a few young LDS Mormons who do their “Mission” here on the South Side of Chicago – these guys have courage and aren’t pussies.

    But, the top of the Latter Day Saints Mormons suck – they should call the church the Church of Latter Day Sissies. This church wouldn’t let Jesus Christ, Joseph Smith or Porter Rockwell in their church now because all 3 got arrested and didn’t wear suits and suck up to rich (money changers) elites all the time.

    I call on all commenters here to make a vow that if they ever come in to physical contact with Mittens Romney they will mess up his always combed hair and call him out for a fist fight. Mitt Romney’s father as Governor of Michigan let lowest life Black criminals burn, loot and destroy my mom’s once beautiful city of Detroit Michigan in 1967. Then Gov. George Romney tried to embrace the Kerner Commission’s “It’s all because of White Racism” Report to run for President – end of his career. We should have ended Mitt Romney’s career when he made as bad as it gets WI Rep. Paul Ryan his VP.

    All of these cuckservatives need to get their arses beat, stripped to the underwear and then dropped off in the worse BlackLiesMatter, gang banging, M13 No Go Zone.

    I hate these cuckservatives worse than the worst Communists, ISIS.

    Read More
  70. jack ryan says: • Website
    @lavoisier
    Romney is and has always been a scumbag. Like McCain. And Ryan.

    Cuckservatives.

    John McCain is a bit worse.

    Read More
  71. joef says:
    @MBlanc46
    If the pols are paying the afros to leave the elites alone, they're not getting good value for money.

    What can I say: liberalism is a mental disorder that denies reality, so they will always attempt to appease the unappeasable afro ghetto dweller, and then point to a success that isn’t there.

    Read More
  72. Thomm says:
    @Mark Presco
    Thomm, You have never adequately defined who you are and what your political position is. All you do is engage in immature name calling and sniping. To me you sound like a young naïve libertarian who is a true believer in the new religion of anti-racism. Like the fascist antifa, who call the alt-right fascist to try to discredit us, you are just as dishonest to call us leftists. Let me try to educate you in the error of your ways.

    It is my belief that the kind of libertarianism I think you promote exists only in this country. It was created by the independent, self-reliant pioneers that settled this country. Only white people with this particular aptitude demonstrate the necessary individual responsibility to make your kind of libertarianism work.

    Unfortunately, most white women don’t have this quality. Being more social and collectivist, they are using the franchise to move this country to the left by creating the nanny state. Women are using democracy to transfer financial responsibility for women and children from some beta male provider to the taxpayer. This is a very good deal for these women. They don’t have to have sex with the guy, cook for the guy, clean up after the guy or be inconvenienced by the guy in any way, shape or form. They just vote themselves the right to reach into the pockets of every man in this country and take what they want. They have voted themselves a license to steal.

    Most people of color are tribal collectivists who think the tribe should provide. They are two orders of magnitude worse than white women. So you see, your kind of libertarianism cannot survive in a democracy in the politically correct environment you promote. The parasites will seize control, run your life and steal you blind.

    I have defined myself as a libertarian in all but immigration policy. Dealing with white parasites is hard enough, dealing with a large population of non-white parasites is impossible in a democracy. Just ask the Venezuelans.

    How many non-white-males fit your definition of libertarian?

    http://www.salon.com/2015/06/10/why_libertarianism_is_so_popular_on_the_right_its_the_last_bastion_of_white_male_dominance/

    I have been over this many times over here, so you will have to dig up my prior comments.

    In summary :

    1) White variance is extremely high. A WN loser has no more in common with a talented, successful white than a chihuahua has with a German Shepherd.

    Median white success tells us nothing. The two groups have to be split out. Hence, the real hierarchy of brains/talent/looks/character is :

    Successful whites
    Asians (East and South)
    Hispanics
    Blacks
    WNs

    2) Untalented people tend to be socialists and devise various rationalizations for why the property of talented people should be redistributed towards them. WNs are no different, because they want intra-white socialism.

    They are two orders of magnitude worse than white women.

    If you are *that* delusional, you deserve what you are getting. Thanks for reminding us that WN is a goddess cult.

    Libertarianism (or equivalent small-govt ideology) is the most fair and most just. WNs fare poorly under meritocracy, so they oppose it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous White Male
    Speaking of delusional, your putting blacks above White Nationalists in brains, looks, and character shows us three things. You don't know any White Nationalists, you watch too much TV, and you are too young to have any wisdom.
    , @Harold
    Belonging to a goddess cult is less contemptible than your bitterness towards women.
  73. @Priss Factor
    I found it utterly unspeakable that a Leftist sociology professor at the University of Tampa, by name of Ken Storey, wrote via social media, that the folks in east Texas are getting what they deserved from Hurricane Harvey—because they voted for President Trump!

    It's the secular quasi-spiritual version of a Christian saying some natural disaster was punishment from God. It goes to show that the PC mindset is essentially quasi-religious. In their eyes, Texas is Sodom because it went for Trump and lags behind in worshiping the true faith of Homomania and Open Borders.

    As terrible as the professor's statement was, I don't think he should have been terminated for that. It's a matter of creed. If he really believes that, it's a personal matter. We can denounce him as a person but as a professional, he should only be judged by his competence at the college.

    Suppose someone says he believes an earthquake in San Fran is God's punishment for the homos. Many people may be appalled, but should the man be fired from his profession for his 'offensive' views?

    Concepts like karma or “deserve” are juvenile. There is only cause & effect.
    Houston is a known site of extreme weather events. There has also been a sustained failure to invest in the infrastructure to mitigate such events- ergo….

    Read More
  74. The problem is right there, under your nose. Obese, angry, empowered women. ALL trouble starts there. Their moods outrun their meds and then we have riots. Their fellow SJWs, the ugly ones with penises, play along hoping to get some pussy. It’s that simple. Put the women back in the kitchens they should never have been allowed out of in the first place, all this stops. Thank God they abort or never breed in the first place. Their spawn we don’t need in the DNA pool.

    Read More
  75. @joef
    You are on the mark as usual. Many of the rich communist believe that they will remain the future power brokers, while they socially engineer the rest of us into acceptable behavior.

    What else is paradoxical is they claim to love mankind but lack empathy in interpersonal direct human contact. It is easy to love mankind from afar, and that is why they hate charity, because they are mostly incapable of it (just as they hate empirical experience, and call it anecdotal, is because they are lacking in it).

    However American communist (SJW, ANTIFA etc) are not like communist of other nations. They are not tough, prefering battles where the other side is not allowed to fight back. They hope that they can manipulate ghetto afros into doing their physical fighting for them, but that is not certain.

    The problems with this are: ghetto afros like easy targets (with some exceptions they are generally not hard fighters, however they do have the capacity for casual use of extreme violence), and are unwilling to sacrifice for the larger communist cause. Instead they are just interested in their ability to coerce unearned material gain from the nation.

    Also whitey hating afros do not make distinctions between good white people and bad white people, as naive libs want to believe. So it is doubtful that ghetto afros would remain loyal allies with whites who have communist ambitions.

    ” you are on the mark as usual”

    Mercy bow coupe.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz musician.

    Read More
  76. KenH says:

    This nation is nearing open civil war and it’s all the fault of the (((radical left))) and the non-whites they manipulate, particularly the blacks. They continue to push the envelope in states and cities controlled by Marxist Democrats knowing their violent antics will be met with a wink and a nod by the state and local authorities while the Trump DOJ fiddles.

    It’s both chilling and sobering that the violent left has so many enablers and sympathizers throughout the establishment and that the law is being used as a weapons against us. And that public and private institutions are actively working to marginalize and destroy rightist and pro-white political dissidents. The long march through the institutions has been a resounding success.

    White persons who merely defends the honor of their race, its history and icons invites charges of “white supremacy” and the wholesale destruction of their lives. The land of the free we are not. Anarcho-tyranny and creeping Bolshevist dictatorship we are becoming.

    It is not “morning again in America” and probably won’t ever be again until whites (the shrinking number that don’t hate themselves) can carve out a new nation from the stinking carcass of today’s multiracial weimerica.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    It is not “morning again in America” and probably won’t ever be again until whites (the shrinking number that don’t hate themselves) can carve out a new nation from the stinking carcass of today’s multiracial weimerica.
     
    Unfortunately historical trends take a very very long time, at times surpassing decades, lifetimes, or generations. Rome did not collapse all at once, it had a long period of slow & steady deterioration first.
    Order does eventually return from the chaos, but it also takes a long time.

    Most other groups have the same concerns as the rest of us in regards to running a household, and taking care of their family. Thus, it is only so far the leftist can manipulate them before these groups start to resist because the leftist agenda interferes with their own rational self interest. So its only so far that leftist can manipulate Hispanics, Asians, and Africans, for their political agenda.

    However, with afro americans the leftist found the perfect stooge. Through the afro americans' never-ending desire for immediate gratification, unearned free lunch entitlements, and other materialistic desires, they are easily manipulated by leftist. As I mentioned in a prior comment, leftist ultimately hope that afro americans will do their physical fighting for them, not understanding that the afro loyalty only goes as far as what goodies they can obtain (besides the fact that most afro thugs like easy targets, not hard fighting).

    The best we probably can do is, as sections/regions of this nation go failed state, is to persevere as we try to carry it forward at the local level for future generations (who hopefully will learn from the chaotic errors the leftist have wrought).
  77. @Thomm
    I have been over this many times over here, so you will have to dig up my prior comments.

    In summary :

    1) White variance is extremely high. A WN loser has no more in common with a talented, successful white than a chihuahua has with a German Shepherd.

    Median white success tells us nothing. The two groups have to be split out. Hence, the real hierarchy of brains/talent/looks/character is :

    Successful whites
    Asians (East and South)
    Hispanics
    Blacks
    WNs

    2) Untalented people tend to be socialists and devise various rationalizations for why the property of talented people should be redistributed towards them. WNs are no different, because they want intra-white socialism.

    They are two orders of magnitude worse than white women.
     
    If you are *that* delusional, you deserve what you are getting. Thanks for reminding us that WN is a goddess cult.

    Libertarianism (or equivalent small-govt ideology) is the most fair and most just. WNs fare poorly under meritocracy, so they oppose it.

    Speaking of delusional, your putting blacks above White Nationalists in brains, looks, and character shows us three things. You don’t know any White Nationalists, you watch too much TV, and you are too young to have any wisdom.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm
    False. What I said is true, and you know it. That is why you are so butthurt and blueballed.

    I know the WN, and his vast limitations, all too well.

    Heh heh heh heh

  78. Harold says:
    @Thomm
    Lawrence is a good illustration of why ‘white’ culture fails. Ashley Judd too.

    Yes. White women, even the pretty ones, have zero race loyalty. Yet since WN is a goddess cult, the WN loser males will still worship a white woman no matter how much she is opposed to WN.

    White women have higher same-race preference in dating than white men.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    White women have higher same-race preference in dating than white men.
     
    If that were the case, you would have a woman. Instead, you got passed over for a black guy.

    WNs combine the worst of all worlds. WNs have negro IQs combined with Asian nerdiness. They are the bottom of the barrel.

    That is why I thank white women for ensuring the genetic waste matter that is WNs gets cut off from reproduction and respectable society. I am greatly thankful to white women for cutting off the WN wiggers.

    Heh heh heh heh
  79. @Stan d Mute
    Sam Francis' described our current Anarcho-Tyranny better than any other. It's unimaginable that white Americans would be allowed to behave as the Africans and the mindless Marxist zombies - we would be set upon by national guard troops immediately. The only place in America that I've seen shut down African mobs is Fort Lauderdale. Miami contains them during African beech week as does Daytona during African spring break, but Fort Lauderdale simply squashes them. I've seen no other city in America even come close.

    As for this ex-"Professor" in Tampa ... perhaps Irma will find him next week. Or Jose the following week. There will be many drowned rats in Florida, let's hope for one more.

    I recall a column by Samuel Francis of twenty-some years ago. He wrote that “liberal compassion” doesn’t extend to white victims of black crime.

    Christopher Lasch wrote years ago that the upper class (white) liberal wears a mask of “smiling benevolence” while underneath has a “venomous hatred” for working and lower middle class white people.

    Read More
  80. Harold says:
    @Thomm
    I have been over this many times over here, so you will have to dig up my prior comments.

    In summary :

    1) White variance is extremely high. A WN loser has no more in common with a talented, successful white than a chihuahua has with a German Shepherd.

    Median white success tells us nothing. The two groups have to be split out. Hence, the real hierarchy of brains/talent/looks/character is :

    Successful whites
    Asians (East and South)
    Hispanics
    Blacks
    WNs

    2) Untalented people tend to be socialists and devise various rationalizations for why the property of talented people should be redistributed towards them. WNs are no different, because they want intra-white socialism.

    They are two orders of magnitude worse than white women.
     
    If you are *that* delusional, you deserve what you are getting. Thanks for reminding us that WN is a goddess cult.

    Libertarianism (or equivalent small-govt ideology) is the most fair and most just. WNs fare poorly under meritocracy, so they oppose it.

    Belonging to a goddess cult is less contemptible than your bitterness towards women.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    Belonging to a goddess cult is less contemptible than your bitterness towards women.

     

    LOL! Good job of advertising your loserdom. But thank you for footing the tab.

    Women want to have sex with red-pill men like me.
    I want to have sex with women.
    Loser dregs like Harold get to pay the bills!

    Everybody wins! Everybody reaches their full potential, especially Harold, who gets to man up, step up, and pay for a woman to have sex with the man she wants.

    Everybody wins!
  81. Thomm says:
    @Harold
    Belonging to a goddess cult is less contemptible than your bitterness towards women.

    Belonging to a goddess cult is less contemptible than your bitterness towards women.

    LOL! Good job of advertising your loserdom. But thank you for footing the tab.

    Women want to have sex with red-pill men like me.
    I want to have sex with women.
    Loser dregs like Harold get to pay the bills!

    Everybody wins! Everybody reaches their full potential, especially Harold, who gets to man up, step up, and pay for a woman to have sex with the man she wants.

    Everybody wins!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Harold
    Your bitterness is an obvious sign of your loserdom.
  82. joef says:
    @KenH
    This nation is nearing open civil war and it's all the fault of the (((radical left))) and the non-whites they manipulate, particularly the blacks. They continue to push the envelope in states and cities controlled by Marxist Democrats knowing their violent antics will be met with a wink and a nod by the state and local authorities while the Trump DOJ fiddles.

    It's both chilling and sobering that the violent left has so many enablers and sympathizers throughout the establishment and that the law is being used as a weapons against us. And that public and private institutions are actively working to marginalize and destroy rightist and pro-white political dissidents. The long march through the institutions has been a resounding success.

    White persons who merely defends the honor of their race, its history and icons invites charges of "white supremacy" and the wholesale destruction of their lives. The land of the free we are not. Anarcho-tyranny and creeping Bolshevist dictatorship we are becoming.

    It is not "morning again in America" and probably won't ever be again until whites (the shrinking number that don't hate themselves) can carve out a new nation from the stinking carcass of today's multiracial weimerica.

    It is not “morning again in America” and probably won’t ever be again until whites (the shrinking number that don’t hate themselves) can carve out a new nation from the stinking carcass of today’s multiracial weimerica.

    Unfortunately historical trends take a very very long time, at times surpassing decades, lifetimes, or generations. Rome did not collapse all at once, it had a long period of slow & steady deterioration first.
    Order does eventually return from the chaos, but it also takes a long time.

    Most other groups have the same concerns as the rest of us in regards to running a household, and taking care of their family. Thus, it is only so far the leftist can manipulate them before these groups start to resist because the leftist agenda interferes with their own rational self interest. So its only so far that leftist can manipulate Hispanics, Asians, and Africans, for their political agenda.

    However, with afro americans the leftist found the perfect stooge. Through the afro americans’ never-ending desire for immediate gratification, unearned free lunch entitlements, and other materialistic desires, they are easily manipulated by leftist. As I mentioned in a prior comment, leftist ultimately hope that afro americans will do their physical fighting for them, not understanding that the afro loyalty only goes as far as what goodies they can obtain (besides the fact that most afro thugs like easy targets, not hard fighting).

    The best we probably can do is, as sections/regions of this nation go failed state, is to persevere as we try to carry it forward at the local level for future generations (who hopefully will learn from the chaotic errors the leftist have wrought).

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH

    Most other groups have the same concerns as the rest of us in regards to running a household, and taking care of their family.
     
    But that doesn't make the different groups potential allies. Race is a major fault line in American politics and this will only intensify as whites decrease as a percentage of the population.

    If you think a rainbow coalition against the (((radical left))) is the possibility you will be sorely disappointed. The left is attacking whites, not blacks and latinos, so they have no reason to throw in with us. And those two groups are part of the coalition of orcs the left is gathering to disenfranchise and dethrone whites.
  83. Thomm says:
    @Harold
    White women have higher same-race preference in dating than white men.

    White women have higher same-race preference in dating than white men.

    If that were the case, you would have a woman. Instead, you got passed over for a black guy.

    WNs combine the worst of all worlds. WNs have negro IQs combined with Asian nerdiness. They are the bottom of the barrel.

    That is why I thank white women for ensuring the genetic waste matter that is WNs gets cut off from reproduction and respectable society. I am greatly thankful to white women for cutting off the WN wiggers.

    Heh heh heh heh

    Read More
    • Replies: @Harold
    It is the case. There are multiple sources of data on this.
  84. Thomm says:
    @Anonymous White Male
    Speaking of delusional, your putting blacks above White Nationalists in brains, looks, and character shows us three things. You don't know any White Nationalists, you watch too much TV, and you are too young to have any wisdom.

    False. What I said is true, and you know it. That is why you are so butthurt and blueballed.

    I know the WN, and his vast limitations, all too well.

    Heh heh heh heh

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous White Male
    Sure, sure. You know the WN. On the internet. Saying that blacks are better looking than Whites is as untrue as you can get. Look up some pictures of negroes. NOT mulattoes. Not quadroons. Not octaroons. Etc. Then look up some pictures of some of the people you know are White Nationalists. You would have to be an idiot to make such a statement. Or a liar. Or both. And character? Yeah, blacks are really known for that as a race, aren't they? I'm sure you could find one negro (not a mulatto, etc.) more intelligent than a White Nationalist, but the odds are against it as a group. Please stop making a fool of yourself. Or don't.
  85. KenH says:
    @Mark Presco
    Thomm, You have never adequately defined who you are and what your political position is. All you do is engage in immature name calling and sniping. To me you sound like a young naïve libertarian who is a true believer in the new religion of anti-racism. Like the fascist antifa, who call the alt-right fascist to try to discredit us, you are just as dishonest to call us leftists. Let me try to educate you in the error of your ways.

    It is my belief that the kind of libertarianism I think you promote exists only in this country. It was created by the independent, self-reliant pioneers that settled this country. Only white people with this particular aptitude demonstrate the necessary individual responsibility to make your kind of libertarianism work.

    Unfortunately, most white women don’t have this quality. Being more social and collectivist, they are using the franchise to move this country to the left by creating the nanny state. Women are using democracy to transfer financial responsibility for women and children from some beta male provider to the taxpayer. This is a very good deal for these women. They don’t have to have sex with the guy, cook for the guy, clean up after the guy or be inconvenienced by the guy in any way, shape or form. They just vote themselves the right to reach into the pockets of every man in this country and take what they want. They have voted themselves a license to steal.

    Most people of color are tribal collectivists who think the tribe should provide. They are two orders of magnitude worse than white women. So you see, your kind of libertarianism cannot survive in a democracy in the politically correct environment you promote. The parasites will seize control, run your life and steal you blind.

    I have defined myself as a libertarian in all but immigration policy. Dealing with white parasites is hard enough, dealing with a large population of non-white parasites is impossible in a democracy. Just ask the Venezuelans.

    How many non-white-males fit your definition of libertarian?

    http://www.salon.com/2015/06/10/why_libertarianism_is_so_popular_on_the_right_its_the_last_bastion_of_white_male_dominance/

    Thomm, You have never adequately defined who you are and what your political position is. All you do is engage in immature name calling and sniping.

    I see you have become acquainted with Thomm the turd burgler and troll. You are right as there is almost never any data or cogency to his arguments and claims. Just baseless ad hominem attacks.

    He loves Indians (the red dot variety from India) and thinks they’re the smartest people to ever grace planet earth but he can’t explain why India remains stuck in 3rd world status or why their best and brightest want to leave for America and other white nations. Yet he claims to be a “a white male from the great lakes area” when pressed about his racial and ethnic lineage.

    He’s the only white man I’m aware of who worships India and Indians.

    Read More
  86. Thomm says:

    White American girl raises $30K because father is racist against black boyfriend.

    While I am obviously not a fan of negros, I do note that each such example is evidence of the inadequacy (at all levels) of WN loser males.

    Since WNs are white males with negro IQs and no rhythm or athleticism, an actual black man is preferable for the girl.

    Read More
  87. @Thomm
    False. What I said is true, and you know it. That is why you are so butthurt and blueballed.

    I know the WN, and his vast limitations, all too well.

    Heh heh heh heh

    Sure, sure. You know the WN. On the internet. Saying that blacks are better looking than Whites is as untrue as you can get. Look up some pictures of negroes. NOT mulattoes. Not quadroons. Not octaroons. Etc. Then look up some pictures of some of the people you know are White Nationalists. You would have to be an idiot to make such a statement. Or a liar. Or both. And character? Yeah, blacks are really known for that as a race, aren’t they? I’m sure you could find one negro (not a mulatto, etc.) more intelligent than a White Nationalist, but the odds are against it as a group. Please stop making a fool of yourself. Or don’t.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    Saying that blacks are better looking than Whites is as untrue as you can get.
     
    I didn't say that at all.

    I just say that white variance is so high, that WNs have zero in common with successful whites. WNs represent wastebaskets that genetic matter is purged from. This is why white women rightfully want nothing to do with loser WN males.

    I realize you don't understand concepts like variance, etc., so you can't figure out why successful whites want nothing to do with you.

    You have no business taking credit for what successful whites do. You are just a wigger (a WN with a negro IQ).

    Remember, the white race has to be divided into two, so the hierarchy of brains/looks/talent/character is :

    Successful whites
    Asians
    Hispanics
    Blacks
    WNs

    I bet you still don't understand the concept of variance. Successful white are on the very top. WNs are on the very bottom. That is why successful whites don't let you into respectable society.

    Heh heh heh heh
  88. One Tribe says:
    @Grandpa Charlie
    According to a website obviously not reliable on the subject, the SPLC ... but still there must be something to this and I make use of it only as a hypothetical:

    "In the first years of the 21st century, Cathey aided an extremist takeover attempt aimed at the Sons of Confederate Veterans, a Southern heritage group."
     
    Here the Left-Right relativistic thing may be meaningful, if we would describe the SCV as in the "Center". So there is a point, One Tribe, to your critique of the Left-Right spectrum, namely that you leave out the Center. I mean, if you think about it, you can't have Left/Right without Center. That's why Left/Right today seems to be a useless concept, because we have no Center, because our USA has been hollowed out.

    The Center might be like the middle squares of a chessboard -- so in theory, up for grabs at all times - still the Center is of enormous strategic interest. Sometimes the Center is vacant except for a million mines -- like the DMZ in Korea. Sometimes the Center looks to be hard-fought a USSR under Stalin or in North Korea under Kim Jong-un.

    Now, your 99% harks back to the days of OCCUPY and that harked back to the "Wobblies" or Industrial Workers of the World, which still exists today even though USA is indeed "post-industrial" or maybe "post-industrialized" (like "globalized"). The fact that IWW still exists attests to a few hardy souls who go beyond "true believers" to become an embattled few who refuse to come in out of the cold ... and of course the fact that IWW still exists attests also to its infiltration, like the infiltration of the US Communist Party or of the KKK or of the Black Block or of Antifa, by what today is called 'Deep State' but which I call 'DHS' (Department of Homeland Security), which is a part of the Deep State, I guess. After infiltration of any such group by "them" - as you say, One Tribe, we had best forget about any Left/Right, because it no longer matters, if it ever did.

    Anyway, anything 99% is obviously engaged in a battle for the Center, for populist control of the Center, which is why OCCUPY scared the crap out of the billionaire branch of the Deep State, to the extent that OCCUPY eventually came under the scrutiny and under attack by the Secret Government (secret because our government isn't supposed to be siding against and destroying any more-or-less successful populist political movement in the USA).

    You see, if you contest the very existence of a Left/Right divide, then you must be placing yourself in the Center and if you actually stir anything up there ... then you are a populist, a more-or-less successful populist, which is very threatening to just about any member of the global billionaire class, including for example, Kim Jong-un or Donald Trump or any of the Bushes. That's why Trump scared them all: he was too close to becoming a genuine populist leader, and that's why he is busying himself these days with showing that he can betray populism or the people right up there with the best of phonies, such as the Clintons.

    Anyway, thanks for the link to URBLURB. And you are correct to suggest that we dispense with the Left/Right divide, because we have no Center, we (USA) have been hollowed out.

    We are the hollow men
    We are the stuffed men
    Leaning together
    Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
    Our dried voices, when
    We whisper together
    Are quiet and meaningless
    As wind in dry grass
    Or rats' feet over broken glass
    In our dry cellar

    Shape without form, shade without colour,
    Paralysed force, gesture without motion;

    Those who have crossed
    With direct eyes, to death's other Kingdom
    Remember us-if at all-not as lost
    Violent souls, but only
    As the hollow men
    The stuffed men.

    -- from T. S. Eliot's The Hollow Men

    https://allpoetry.com/The-Hollow-Men
     

    Chuck:

    Thanks for all the thought and consideration, obvious in your reply to my comment.

    While I totally agree that the middle class has been hollowed out, I think that you are closer to the facts (that we may never know), with your “…infiltration…” observations.

    When almost all of the people are so stressed out financially, it is so easy to buy them off, and infiltrate any ‘benevolent’ organization/social movement.

    We, especially in the U.S.A. (from what I can see from my nearby perspective), but now everywhere, as this culture has successfully been ‘exported’ to western Europe, live in a culture where zero sum gain and negative sum gain gaming the system is held in the highest esteem, even when it threatens to wipe out the planet!

    The advent of this new, incredibly powerful perception management capability (greatly enhanced by the internet/handheld interface technological pervasiveness), has resulted in people not paying almost any attention to what is occurring in the ‘real’ world, and putting more weight of ‘reality’ into the digitally moderated world.
    Obviously this is really, really problematic for the well-being 99% (where it is conflict with the insatiability of the 0.1% power-mongering faction sociopaths; which is always, from a socio-pathic perspective).

    The question is:

    What can be done?

    I’d enjoy reading your ruminations on that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Grandpa Charlie
    One Tribe:

    Before I get into your question for me, I note that I posted a correction to the comment on which you commented, and that correction is at #103.

    What can be done?
     
    There is one group that came to Charlottesville just to protect the Constitution. They came as peacekeepers. They call themselves and I think they are "Patriots".

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLA4lEtmH2A

    I think such people as these folks actually are the Center, which is springing to life.

    I am not a Southerner, never even been in the South, unless you would count San Antonio, and I wasn't there for long, although the folks I met there were welcoming and wonderful.

    Although I consider myself a conservative and a libertarian, I oppose the economic theories of the Mises Institute. My economic philosophy derives from Henry C. Simons, and Mises Institute types would consider me practically a communist. as they do Simons - although Simons was mentor of none other than Milton Friedman. Although I contend that I follow the true direction of Simons' philosophy of political economics, I am anti-globalization. I also admire the political philosophy of Sun Yat Sen: Three Principles of the People, including Nationalism (Democracy and Livelihood of the People).

    My general philosophy derives from Nichiren Buddhism: Nam Myoho Renge Kyo. And I believe in Jesus.

    I live pretty far out in the country in a Western state.

    And yes, I am a Constitutionalist. That's where we can find the Center, in the Constitution.

    E.g., I advocate that we embrace the Electoral College more fully, that we return to the original idea of it, that each state would have electors who would have to be non-political, not holding any political office, and who would act in each state as a kind of talent scouting organization. The job of the Electoral College should be to find candidates for the presidency, just like they originally found George Washington without any campaigning or political parties with primaries where the "electors" are mere place-holders for candidates. This change, I believe, would not even require passage of any Constitutional amendment.

    And yet, despite all my weird ideas, I relate to the people in the video, I feel myself to be partial to them, to the Patriots. They (we) are the Center.
  89. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Giuseppe

    a Leftist sociology professor at the University of Tampa, by name of Ken Storey, wrote via social media, that the folks in east Texas are getting what they deserved from Hurricane Harvey—because they voted for President Trump! He called it “karma.” Although he has since apologized (and been terminated)
     
    What Storey said was perfectly asinine but termination is absolutely ridiculous. People can't say stupid things, left or right, or offer an opinion that is sort of out there anymore. What is this, the Civil War?

    Let’s get some perspective here. Any college prof from ANY era in American history who said what Storey did would have been fired. At no point would this have been tolerated by any college administration which does, after all, have to support itself by attracting students via parents who agree to pay their kids’ tuition. It’s bad salesmanship for the college, from the administration’s point of view.

    Read More
  90. Thomm says:
    @Anonymous White Male
    Sure, sure. You know the WN. On the internet. Saying that blacks are better looking than Whites is as untrue as you can get. Look up some pictures of negroes. NOT mulattoes. Not quadroons. Not octaroons. Etc. Then look up some pictures of some of the people you know are White Nationalists. You would have to be an idiot to make such a statement. Or a liar. Or both. And character? Yeah, blacks are really known for that as a race, aren't they? I'm sure you could find one negro (not a mulatto, etc.) more intelligent than a White Nationalist, but the odds are against it as a group. Please stop making a fool of yourself. Or don't.

    Saying that blacks are better looking than Whites is as untrue as you can get.

    I didn’t say that at all.

    I just say that white variance is so high, that WNs have zero in common with successful whites. WNs represent wastebaskets that genetic matter is purged from. This is why white women rightfully want nothing to do with loser WN males.

    I realize you don’t understand concepts like variance, etc., so you can’t figure out why successful whites want nothing to do with you.

    You have no business taking credit for what successful whites do. You are just a wigger (a WN with a negro IQ).

    Remember, the white race has to be divided into two, so the hierarchy of brains/looks/talent/character is :

    Successful whites
    Asians
    Hispanics
    Blacks
    WNs

    I bet you still don’t understand the concept of variance. Successful white are on the very top. WNs are on the very bottom. That is why successful whites don’t let you into respectable society.

    Heh heh heh heh

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark Presco
    Thomm, your tired old tripe is not an argument. It is just your opinion, and it is presented in such an infantile manner that it makes your opinion worthless.

    You do not have the slightest clue what kind of people white nationalists are. Very few are neo-Nazis.

    You do not have the slightest clue what the white elite think about WNs. What we know about the politically correct white elite is that the vast majority of them live in lily-white gated communities that keep non-whites out.

    I assume that would include you, unless you can prove you are who you say you are. I’m betting you can’t.

    I am a white nationalist that prove your statements wrong. I am highly successful technologically and financially. Here are two examples.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEVlOo5DEFg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=960eV8h9u3U

    Can you do better?
  91. @Logan
    Actually thought of that while typing in the response. But Iraq wasn't being invaded from every direction as France was. All of Europe essentially marched against France, and the Committee of Safety beat them. Quite a feat, actually.

    I think it's also fair to consider what would have happened in France had the forces of reaction defeated the Committee. There would without doubt have been massive repression and huge numbers of executions, including of many who had supported only the initial and moderate stages of the Revolution, such as, for instance, Lafayette.

    In all likelihood the White reaction would have killed more than the Red Revolution. As it did when the French national government crushed the Communards in 1871.

    Don't get me wrong. I'm not at all a fan of the French Revolution. But by that particular point in history, most of the common people were well aware that they could no longer go back to the mild authoritarianism of Louis XVI. They'd burned that bridge all the way down. Any restored monarchy would be savagely repressive and absolutist.

    Has anybody put together a list of examples where the absolute freedom of the people was better after than before?

    Read More
  92. KenH says:
    @joef

    It is not “morning again in America” and probably won’t ever be again until whites (the shrinking number that don’t hate themselves) can carve out a new nation from the stinking carcass of today’s multiracial weimerica.
     
    Unfortunately historical trends take a very very long time, at times surpassing decades, lifetimes, or generations. Rome did not collapse all at once, it had a long period of slow & steady deterioration first.
    Order does eventually return from the chaos, but it also takes a long time.

    Most other groups have the same concerns as the rest of us in regards to running a household, and taking care of their family. Thus, it is only so far the leftist can manipulate them before these groups start to resist because the leftist agenda interferes with their own rational self interest. So its only so far that leftist can manipulate Hispanics, Asians, and Africans, for their political agenda.

    However, with afro americans the leftist found the perfect stooge. Through the afro americans' never-ending desire for immediate gratification, unearned free lunch entitlements, and other materialistic desires, they are easily manipulated by leftist. As I mentioned in a prior comment, leftist ultimately hope that afro americans will do their physical fighting for them, not understanding that the afro loyalty only goes as far as what goodies they can obtain (besides the fact that most afro thugs like easy targets, not hard fighting).

    The best we probably can do is, as sections/regions of this nation go failed state, is to persevere as we try to carry it forward at the local level for future generations (who hopefully will learn from the chaotic errors the leftist have wrought).

    Most other groups have the same concerns as the rest of us in regards to running a household, and taking care of their family.

    But that doesn’t make the different groups potential allies. Race is a major fault line in American politics and this will only intensify as whites decrease as a percentage of the population.

    If you think a rainbow coalition against the (((radical left))) is the possibility you will be sorely disappointed. The left is attacking whites, not blacks and latinos, so they have no reason to throw in with us. And those two groups are part of the coalition of orcs the left is gathering to disenfranchise and dethrone whites.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    If you think a rainbow coalition against the (((radical left))) is the possibility you will be sorely disappointed. The left is attacking whites, not blacks and latinos, so they have no reason to throw in with us.
     
    No, you misunderstood me, I expect no coalition at all. I am just saying when leftism intrudes upon peoples rational self interest they will abandon it.

    In regards to african americans, their ambitions almost completely coincide with the leftist agenda because of all the goodies they are provided. Where that relationship will break down is that leftist have an unrealistic expectation of afros ability to do their fighting for them. This will fail because a) afros hate whitey randomly without distinction, b) despite being capable of using extreme violence for innocuous reasons, afros generally like easy targets, and c) afro loyalty only extends as far as they are getting something out of it, and d) afros will be very unwilling to suffer personal hardship & sacrifice for a political cause.

    The other issue is that we are very far along with leftist spendthrift government policies, and this massive debt Ponzi scheme will continue to degrade our economy. Leftist will not want to reduce welfare spending to afros because deep down they know that is one of primary reasons they maintain afro loyalty (again, no goodies no loyalty). SO every other govt service will go on the chopping block in order to continue to buy (maintain) that afro loyalty.

    But ultimately the expensive leftist agenda itself will not be able to be maintained, and you will see regions of this nation devolve into similar conditions of a failed state with its resultant scarcity. Most other groups from third world nations know how to survive with less... but afros are going to look for someone to blame (which usually translates into blaming whitey). From this the violent unrest will become ubiquitous (until the afros themselves starve to death without white govt care).

    Without entitlements to buy afro loyalty, and the rest of us recognizing that the leftist are the ones mostly responsible for the economic bring down of this nation, they are going to have a major problem with their personal survival (leftists will finally reap what they sow). There die off would be a benefit, but the only problem is they will cause a broken country in their wake.

    The rebuilding will take decades... This is nothing new to history, and if we continue on this track, this is where we will eventually end up . So I am not worried about the leftist agenda because I know it will not last, because all leftist experiments eventually fail. What I worry about is how to outlast it (if that even happens within our lifetimes).
  93. Mark Presco says: • Website
    @Thomm

    Saying that blacks are better looking than Whites is as untrue as you can get.
     
    I didn't say that at all.

    I just say that white variance is so high, that WNs have zero in common with successful whites. WNs represent wastebaskets that genetic matter is purged from. This is why white women rightfully want nothing to do with loser WN males.

    I realize you don't understand concepts like variance, etc., so you can't figure out why successful whites want nothing to do with you.

    You have no business taking credit for what successful whites do. You are just a wigger (a WN with a negro IQ).

    Remember, the white race has to be divided into two, so the hierarchy of brains/looks/talent/character is :

    Successful whites
    Asians
    Hispanics
    Blacks
    WNs

    I bet you still don't understand the concept of variance. Successful white are on the very top. WNs are on the very bottom. That is why successful whites don't let you into respectable society.

    Heh heh heh heh

    Thomm, your tired old tripe is not an argument. It is just your opinion, and it is presented in such an infantile manner that it makes your opinion worthless.

    You do not have the slightest clue what kind of people white nationalists are. Very few are neo-Nazis.

    You do not have the slightest clue what the white elite think about WNs. What we know about the politically correct white elite is that the vast majority of them live in lily-white gated communities that keep non-whites out.

    I assume that would include you, unless you can prove you are who you say you are. I’m betting you can’t.

    I am a white nationalist that prove your statements wrong. I am highly successful technologically and financially. Here are two examples.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEVlOo5DEFg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=960eV8h9u3U

    Can you do better?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    You do not have the slightest clue what kind of people white nationalists are. Very few are neo-Nazis.
     
    Racism combined with left-wing economic views. It is all the same.

    hat we know about the politically correct white elite is that the vast majority of them live in lily-white gated communities that keep non-whites out.

    It is because of crime, not race. Those gated communities all have Asians. Every single one of the most expensive towns in America has disproportionate Asian presence. Then again, WNs don't do math, so you probably can't grasp this.

    But it is not about 'elite' whites. It is about normal whites, and the small (10%) minority that comprise the genetic wastebaskets that are WN. That is why WN never gets any traction with normal whites.

    You are a genetic aberration and continue to reside in the dustbin of history. One can dislike black dysfunction without being a Nationalist-Leftist.
  94. @Clark Westwood

    Thomm, can you point to a White country that has allowed non-Whites in it that is better off for that mistake? And “diversity” is not an honest response, nor is “Everybody knows this is true!”. What have they brought to the table? Are there some races that are net negatives in maintaining the country they have been allowed to migrate to?
     
    I like this thought experiment as another way of getting at the same idea (I forget where I first came across this):

    Imagine you belong to the middle class (or whatever corresponds to the middle class) of some third-world country circa 1880. It doesn't matter what country -- it can be somewhere in Southeast Asia, South America, Africa, the South Pacific, wherever. Also imagine that you don't work for the existing government or depend on it in any direct way for your livelihood. Now imagine that you can choose any country in the world (including the country that we're imagining you live in) to "run" your country. Which one would you choose?

    The more I study history, the more certain I've become that I would want England to run my country. I think the Brits would do a better job than any other candidate.

    I was in the Gambia a while ago and the vastly expressed preference was to have the Brits back.

    What I found really sad was the Christian graveyards full of hordes of Englishmen in their 20′s.

    Read More
  95. And you are an ignorant POS. This is what you said, tiny dingus:

    “Hence, the real hierarchy of brains/talent/looks/character is :

    Successful whites
    Asians (East and South)
    Hispanics
    Blacks
    WNs”

    So, WN’s aren’t White? Show us some pictures of White Nationalists, why don’t you. And if you can’t, shut up. You are a troll. And if you really understood variance, you wouldn’t make such an ignorant statement as “Remember, the white race has to be divided into two”. The White race is a continuum, not just a dichotomy, fecal brains.

    This is what I asked you originally, which you avoided like the plaque:

    “Thomm, can you point to a White country that has allowed non-Whites in it that is better off for that mistake? And “diversity” is not an honest response, nor is “Everybody knows this is true!”. What have they brought to the table? Are there some races that are net negatives in maintaining the country they have been allowed to migrate to? And also, if the US collapses and forms different ethnic enclaves which then choose to allow citizenship only to Whites, will that be bad as well?”

    If you have no intention of answering this, go back to your mother’s basement.

    Read More
  96. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    A “successful white” is just a white who’s livelihood (still) isn’t threatened by immigration, affirmative action and offshoring. That category gets smaller every year, and the days when only blue collar workers had to worry about these things are long past.

    Read More
  97. Thomm says:
    @Mark Presco
    Thomm, your tired old tripe is not an argument. It is just your opinion, and it is presented in such an infantile manner that it makes your opinion worthless.

    You do not have the slightest clue what kind of people white nationalists are. Very few are neo-Nazis.

    You do not have the slightest clue what the white elite think about WNs. What we know about the politically correct white elite is that the vast majority of them live in lily-white gated communities that keep non-whites out.

    I assume that would include you, unless you can prove you are who you say you are. I’m betting you can’t.

    I am a white nationalist that prove your statements wrong. I am highly successful technologically and financially. Here are two examples.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEVlOo5DEFg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=960eV8h9u3U

    Can you do better?

    You do not have the slightest clue what kind of people white nationalists are. Very few are neo-Nazis.

    Racism combined with left-wing economic views. It is all the same.

    hat we know about the politically correct white elite is that the vast majority of them live in lily-white gated communities that keep non-whites out.

    It is because of crime, not race. Those gated communities all have Asians. Every single one of the most expensive towns in America has disproportionate Asian presence. Then again, WNs don’t do math, so you probably can’t grasp this.

    But it is not about ‘elite’ whites. It is about normal whites, and the small (10%) minority that comprise the genetic wastebaskets that are WN. That is why WN never gets any traction with normal whites.

    You are a genetic aberration and continue to reside in the dustbin of history. One can dislike black dysfunction without being a Nationalist-Leftist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark Presco
    Well Thomm my man, there is just no getting through to you. I have given you arguments and evidence that disprove your claims but you just regurgitate the same old tripe. Here’s one more.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/life/caixin/2015/07/silicon_valley_white_asian_divide_why_families_self_segregate_and_what_can.html

    Even after I prove to you that I work in high tech, do math and have actually lived in one of those gated communities, you ignore it and begin your usual infantile insults and sniping. You really behave like you are a member of Antifa.

    You have failed to prove you are what you say you are even after braying about your grand achievements like a jackass. The only thing you have shown me is that you are the one with “a negro IQ”. From what I have read many at this site will agree with this.

    I will stop wasting my time now.
    , @BenKenobi
    Nexus 6 replicant detected.

    Recommend retirement.
  98. @Grandpa Charlie
    According to a website obviously not reliable on the subject, the SPLC ... but still there must be something to this and I make use of it only as a hypothetical:

    "In the first years of the 21st century, Cathey aided an extremist takeover attempt aimed at the Sons of Confederate Veterans, a Southern heritage group."
     
    Here the Left-Right relativistic thing may be meaningful, if we would describe the SCV as in the "Center". So there is a point, One Tribe, to your critique of the Left-Right spectrum, namely that you leave out the Center. I mean, if you think about it, you can't have Left/Right without Center. That's why Left/Right today seems to be a useless concept, because we have no Center, because our USA has been hollowed out.

    The Center might be like the middle squares of a chessboard -- so in theory, up for grabs at all times - still the Center is of enormous strategic interest. Sometimes the Center is vacant except for a million mines -- like the DMZ in Korea. Sometimes the Center looks to be hard-fought a USSR under Stalin or in North Korea under Kim Jong-un.

    Now, your 99% harks back to the days of OCCUPY and that harked back to the "Wobblies" or Industrial Workers of the World, which still exists today even though USA is indeed "post-industrial" or maybe "post-industrialized" (like "globalized"). The fact that IWW still exists attests to a few hardy souls who go beyond "true believers" to become an embattled few who refuse to come in out of the cold ... and of course the fact that IWW still exists attests also to its infiltration, like the infiltration of the US Communist Party or of the KKK or of the Black Block or of Antifa, by what today is called 'Deep State' but which I call 'DHS' (Department of Homeland Security), which is a part of the Deep State, I guess. After infiltration of any such group by "them" - as you say, One Tribe, we had best forget about any Left/Right, because it no longer matters, if it ever did.

    Anyway, anything 99% is obviously engaged in a battle for the Center, for populist control of the Center, which is why OCCUPY scared the crap out of the billionaire branch of the Deep State, to the extent that OCCUPY eventually came under the scrutiny and under attack by the Secret Government (secret because our government isn't supposed to be siding against and destroying any more-or-less successful populist political movement in the USA).

    You see, if you contest the very existence of a Left/Right divide, then you must be placing yourself in the Center and if you actually stir anything up there ... then you are a populist, a more-or-less successful populist, which is very threatening to just about any member of the global billionaire class, including for example, Kim Jong-un or Donald Trump or any of the Bushes. That's why Trump scared them all: he was too close to becoming a genuine populist leader, and that's why he is busying himself these days with showing that he can betray populism or the people right up there with the best of phonies, such as the Clintons.

    Anyway, thanks for the link to URBLURB. And you are correct to suggest that we dispense with the Left/Right divide, because we have no Center, we (USA) have been hollowed out.

    We are the hollow men
    We are the stuffed men
    Leaning together
    Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
    Our dried voices, when
    We whisper together
    Are quiet and meaningless
    As wind in dry grass
    Or rats' feet over broken glass
    In our dry cellar

    Shape without form, shade without colour,
    Paralysed force, gesture without motion;

    Those who have crossed
    With direct eyes, to death's other Kingdom
    Remember us-if at all-not as lost
    Violent souls, but only
    As the hollow men
    The stuffed men.

    -- from T. S. Eliot's The Hollow Men

    https://allpoetry.com/The-Hollow-Men
     

    Ooops! Sometimes my fingers slip on the keyboard/trackpad … so when I read over my comment, I discovered this:

    “sometimes the Center is vacant except for a million mines — like the DMZ in Korea. Sometimes the Center looks to be hard-fought a USSR under Stalin or in North Korea under Kim Jong-un.”

    WTF happened there? No, the center under Stalin or Kim Jong-un … there’s no contesting it at all, unless on pain of death or worse.

    WHAT I MEANT TO TYPE WAS SOMETHING LIKE THIS:

    Sometimes the Center looks to be hard-fought: a battleground like Gettysburg. And sometimes the Center is a monolithic mass: a USSR under Stalin or North Korea under Kim Jong -un.”

    Read More
  99. joef says:
    @KenH

    Most other groups have the same concerns as the rest of us in regards to running a household, and taking care of their family.
     
    But that doesn't make the different groups potential allies. Race is a major fault line in American politics and this will only intensify as whites decrease as a percentage of the population.

    If you think a rainbow coalition against the (((radical left))) is the possibility you will be sorely disappointed. The left is attacking whites, not blacks and latinos, so they have no reason to throw in with us. And those two groups are part of the coalition of orcs the left is gathering to disenfranchise and dethrone whites.

    If you think a rainbow coalition against the (((radical left))) is the possibility you will be sorely disappointed. The left is attacking whites, not blacks and latinos, so they have no reason to throw in with us.

    No, you misunderstood me, I expect no coalition at all. I am just saying when leftism intrudes upon peoples rational self interest they will abandon it.

    In regards to african americans, their ambitions almost completely coincide with the leftist agenda because of all the goodies they are provided. Where that relationship will break down is that leftist have an unrealistic expectation of afros ability to do their fighting for them. This will fail because a) afros hate whitey randomly without distinction, b) despite being capable of using extreme violence for innocuous reasons, afros generally like easy targets, and c) afro loyalty only extends as far as they are getting something out of it, and d) afros will be very unwilling to suffer personal hardship & sacrifice for a political cause.

    The other issue is that we are very far along with leftist spendthrift government policies, and this massive debt Ponzi scheme will continue to degrade our economy. Leftist will not want to reduce welfare spending to afros because deep down they know that is one of primary reasons they maintain afro loyalty (again, no goodies no loyalty). SO every other govt service will go on the chopping block in order to continue to buy (maintain) that afro loyalty.

    But ultimately the expensive leftist agenda itself will not be able to be maintained, and you will see regions of this nation devolve into similar conditions of a failed state with its resultant scarcity. Most other groups from third world nations know how to survive with less… but afros are going to look for someone to blame (which usually translates into blaming whitey). From this the violent unrest will become ubiquitous (until the afros themselves starve to death without white govt care).

    Without entitlements to buy afro loyalty, and the rest of us recognizing that the leftist are the ones mostly responsible for the economic bring down of this nation, they are going to have a major problem with their personal survival (leftists will finally reap what they sow). There die off would be a benefit, but the only problem is they will cause a broken country in their wake.

    The rebuilding will take decades… This is nothing new to history, and if we continue on this track, this is where we will eventually end up . So I am not worried about the leftist agenda because I know it will not last, because all leftist experiments eventually fail. What I worry about is how to outlast it (if that even happens within our lifetimes).

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    Another reason why a coalition will not be formed is because the two mechanisms to create such a coalition has been thoroughly eliminated by our current American leftist culture. These systems are assimilation of foreigners into patriotic Americans, and Christianity. Both being an American and Christianity, require subordination of your personal ethnic identity for a greater identity and purpose. These mechanisms no longer widely exist within our culture, therefore leftist inspired identify politics will continue to cause further social fractionalization in this nation (which risks the chaos of all against all).
    , @KenH
    Ok, I understand now and your assessment of blacks is pretty much spot on. Savages are of limited utility and can be difficult to control once they've been fired up. And American blacks are about as high maintenance as you can get. As you've said the only way to keep them on the plantation and semi-pacified is with continued massive welfare, medicaid, section 8 and set asides like AA.

    What I worry about is how to outlast it (if that even happens within our lifetimes).
     
    This nation could collapse almost overnight like the former Soviet Union or it could take another 2-3 decades for things to come crashing down around us. Parasitic groups like blacks and Latinos who live largely at the good will and from wealth and productivity generated by whites will see their birthrates implode and we could see those two groups victimizing each other in large numbers.

    But the white birthrate is barely at replacement level so it will be very hard to outlast cultural Marxism and the sweeping demographic changes if we won't reproduce. It's just a simple matter of math and time. Therefore, it's in our interest for the central government to collapse or become feeble so as to allow racially conscious whites to regroup and form ethnostates since the status quo will lead to genocide. By design.

  100. joef says:
    @joef

    If you think a rainbow coalition against the (((radical left))) is the possibility you will be sorely disappointed. The left is attacking whites, not blacks and latinos, so they have no reason to throw in with us.
     
    No, you misunderstood me, I expect no coalition at all. I am just saying when leftism intrudes upon peoples rational self interest they will abandon it.

    In regards to african americans, their ambitions almost completely coincide with the leftist agenda because of all the goodies they are provided. Where that relationship will break down is that leftist have an unrealistic expectation of afros ability to do their fighting for them. This will fail because a) afros hate whitey randomly without distinction, b) despite being capable of using extreme violence for innocuous reasons, afros generally like easy targets, and c) afro loyalty only extends as far as they are getting something out of it, and d) afros will be very unwilling to suffer personal hardship & sacrifice for a political cause.

    The other issue is that we are very far along with leftist spendthrift government policies, and this massive debt Ponzi scheme will continue to degrade our economy. Leftist will not want to reduce welfare spending to afros because deep down they know that is one of primary reasons they maintain afro loyalty (again, no goodies no loyalty). SO every other govt service will go on the chopping block in order to continue to buy (maintain) that afro loyalty.

    But ultimately the expensive leftist agenda itself will not be able to be maintained, and you will see regions of this nation devolve into similar conditions of a failed state with its resultant scarcity. Most other groups from third world nations know how to survive with less... but afros are going to look for someone to blame (which usually translates into blaming whitey). From this the violent unrest will become ubiquitous (until the afros themselves starve to death without white govt care).

    Without entitlements to buy afro loyalty, and the rest of us recognizing that the leftist are the ones mostly responsible for the economic bring down of this nation, they are going to have a major problem with their personal survival (leftists will finally reap what they sow). There die off would be a benefit, but the only problem is they will cause a broken country in their wake.

    The rebuilding will take decades... This is nothing new to history, and if we continue on this track, this is where we will eventually end up . So I am not worried about the leftist agenda because I know it will not last, because all leftist experiments eventually fail. What I worry about is how to outlast it (if that even happens within our lifetimes).

    Another reason why a coalition will not be formed is because the two mechanisms to create such a coalition has been thoroughly eliminated by our current American leftist culture. These systems are assimilation of foreigners into patriotic Americans, and Christianity. Both being an American and Christianity, require subordination of your personal ethnic identity for a greater identity and purpose. These mechanisms no longer widely exist within our culture, therefore leftist inspired identify politics will continue to cause further social fractionalization in this nation (which risks the chaos of all against all).

    Read More
  101. Mark Presco says: • Website
    @Thomm

    You do not have the slightest clue what kind of people white nationalists are. Very few are neo-Nazis.
     
    Racism combined with left-wing economic views. It is all the same.

    hat we know about the politically correct white elite is that the vast majority of them live in lily-white gated communities that keep non-whites out.

    It is because of crime, not race. Those gated communities all have Asians. Every single one of the most expensive towns in America has disproportionate Asian presence. Then again, WNs don't do math, so you probably can't grasp this.

    But it is not about 'elite' whites. It is about normal whites, and the small (10%) minority that comprise the genetic wastebaskets that are WN. That is why WN never gets any traction with normal whites.

    You are a genetic aberration and continue to reside in the dustbin of history. One can dislike black dysfunction without being a Nationalist-Leftist.

    Well Thomm my man, there is just no getting through to you. I have given you arguments and evidence that disprove your claims but you just regurgitate the same old tripe. Here’s one more.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/life/caixin/2015/07/silicon_valley_white_asian_divide_why_families_self_segregate_and_what_can.html

    Even after I prove to you that I work in high tech, do math and have actually lived in one of those gated communities, you ignore it and begin your usual infantile insults and sniping. You really behave like you are a member of Antifa.

    You have failed to prove you are what you say you are even after braying about your grand achievements like a jackass. The only thing you have shown me is that you are the one with “a negro IQ”. From what I have read many at this site will agree with this.

    I will stop wasting my time now.

    Read More
  102. @One Tribe
    Chuck:

    Thanks for all the thought and consideration, obvious in your reply to my comment.

    While I totally agree that the middle class has been hollowed out, I think that you are closer to the facts (that we may never know), with your "...infiltration..." observations.

    When almost all of the people are so stressed out financially, it is so easy to buy them off, and infiltrate any 'benevolent' organization/social movement.

    We, especially in the U.S.A. (from what I can see from my nearby perspective), but now everywhere, as this culture has successfully been 'exported' to western Europe, live in a culture where zero sum gain and negative sum gain gaming the system is held in the highest esteem, even when it threatens to wipe out the planet!

    The advent of this new, incredibly powerful perception management capability (greatly enhanced by the internet/handheld interface technological pervasiveness), has resulted in people not paying almost any attention to what is occurring in the 'real' world, and putting more weight of 'reality' into the digitally moderated world.
    Obviously this is really, really problematic for the well-being 99% (where it is conflict with the insatiability of the 0.1% power-mongering faction sociopaths; which is always, from a socio-pathic perspective).

    The question is:

    What can be done?
     
    I'd enjoy reading your ruminations on that.

    One Tribe:

    Before I get into your question for me, I note that I posted a correction to the comment on which you commented, and that correction is at #103.

    What can be done?

    There is one group that came to Charlottesville just to protect the Constitution. They came as peacekeepers. They call themselves and I think they are “Patriots”.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLA4lEtmH2A

    I think such people as these folks actually are the Center, which is springing to life.

    I am not a Southerner, never even been in the South, unless you would count San Antonio, and I wasn’t there for long, although the folks I met there were welcoming and wonderful.

    Although I consider myself a conservative and a libertarian, I oppose the economic theories of the Mises Institute. My economic philosophy derives from Henry C. Simons, and Mises Institute types would consider me practically a communist. as they do Simons – although Simons was mentor of none other than Milton Friedman. Although I contend that I follow the true direction of Simons’ philosophy of political economics, I am anti-globalization. I also admire the political philosophy of Sun Yat Sen: Three Principles of the People, including Nationalism (Democracy and Livelihood of the People).

    My general philosophy derives from Nichiren Buddhism: Nam Myoho Renge Kyo. And I believe in Jesus.

    I live pretty far out in the country in a Western state.

    And yes, I am a Constitutionalist. That’s where we can find the Center, in the Constitution.

    E.g., I advocate that we embrace the Electoral College more fully, that we return to the original idea of it, that each state would have electors who would have to be non-political, not holding any political office, and who would act in each state as a kind of talent scouting organization. The job of the Electoral College should be to find candidates for the presidency, just like they originally found George Washington without any campaigning or political parties with primaries where the “electors” are mere place-holders for candidates. This change, I believe, would not even require passage of any Constitutional amendment.

    And yet, despite all my weird ideas, I relate to the people in the video, I feel myself to be partial to them, to the Patriots. They (we) are the Center.

    Read More
  103. Harold says:
    @Thomm

    White women have higher same-race preference in dating than white men.
     
    If that were the case, you would have a woman. Instead, you got passed over for a black guy.

    WNs combine the worst of all worlds. WNs have negro IQs combined with Asian nerdiness. They are the bottom of the barrel.

    That is why I thank white women for ensuring the genetic waste matter that is WNs gets cut off from reproduction and respectable society. I am greatly thankful to white women for cutting off the WN wiggers.

    Heh heh heh heh

    It is the case. There are multiple sources of data on this.

    Read More
  104. Harold says:
    @Thomm

    Belonging to a goddess cult is less contemptible than your bitterness towards women.

     

    LOL! Good job of advertising your loserdom. But thank you for footing the tab.

    Women want to have sex with red-pill men like me.
    I want to have sex with women.
    Loser dregs like Harold get to pay the bills!

    Everybody wins! Everybody reaches their full potential, especially Harold, who gets to man up, step up, and pay for a woman to have sex with the man she wants.

    Everybody wins!

    Your bitterness is an obvious sign of your loserdom.

    Read More
  105. I would sure feel sorry for a naive, upstanding young guy would fall in love with any of those deranged nut-case ladies displayed on the above image.
    He would be in for the emotional hell-ride of his life, inevitably ending in heartbreak and dispair, and a distrust of all women for the rest of his days.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army Vet, and pro Jazz musician.

    Read More
  106. BenKenobi says:
    @Thomm

    You do not have the slightest clue what kind of people white nationalists are. Very few are neo-Nazis.
     
    Racism combined with left-wing economic views. It is all the same.

    hat we know about the politically correct white elite is that the vast majority of them live in lily-white gated communities that keep non-whites out.

    It is because of crime, not race. Those gated communities all have Asians. Every single one of the most expensive towns in America has disproportionate Asian presence. Then again, WNs don't do math, so you probably can't grasp this.

    But it is not about 'elite' whites. It is about normal whites, and the small (10%) minority that comprise the genetic wastebaskets that are WN. That is why WN never gets any traction with normal whites.

    You are a genetic aberration and continue to reside in the dustbin of history. One can dislike black dysfunction without being a Nationalist-Leftist.

    Nexus 6 replicant detected.

    Recommend retirement.

    Read More
  107. Perhaps Irma is karma for having elected Bush? Please, please, I’m kidding.

    Read More
  108. KenH says:
    @joef

    If you think a rainbow coalition against the (((radical left))) is the possibility you will be sorely disappointed. The left is attacking whites, not blacks and latinos, so they have no reason to throw in with us.
     
    No, you misunderstood me, I expect no coalition at all. I am just saying when leftism intrudes upon peoples rational self interest they will abandon it.

    In regards to african americans, their ambitions almost completely coincide with the leftist agenda because of all the goodies they are provided. Where that relationship will break down is that leftist have an unrealistic expectation of afros ability to do their fighting for them. This will fail because a) afros hate whitey randomly without distinction, b) despite being capable of using extreme violence for innocuous reasons, afros generally like easy targets, and c) afro loyalty only extends as far as they are getting something out of it, and d) afros will be very unwilling to suffer personal hardship & sacrifice for a political cause.

    The other issue is that we are very far along with leftist spendthrift government policies, and this massive debt Ponzi scheme will continue to degrade our economy. Leftist will not want to reduce welfare spending to afros because deep down they know that is one of primary reasons they maintain afro loyalty (again, no goodies no loyalty). SO every other govt service will go on the chopping block in order to continue to buy (maintain) that afro loyalty.

    But ultimately the expensive leftist agenda itself will not be able to be maintained, and you will see regions of this nation devolve into similar conditions of a failed state with its resultant scarcity. Most other groups from third world nations know how to survive with less... but afros are going to look for someone to blame (which usually translates into blaming whitey). From this the violent unrest will become ubiquitous (until the afros themselves starve to death without white govt care).

    Without entitlements to buy afro loyalty, and the rest of us recognizing that the leftist are the ones mostly responsible for the economic bring down of this nation, they are going to have a major problem with their personal survival (leftists will finally reap what they sow). There die off would be a benefit, but the only problem is they will cause a broken country in their wake.

    The rebuilding will take decades... This is nothing new to history, and if we continue on this track, this is where we will eventually end up . So I am not worried about the leftist agenda because I know it will not last, because all leftist experiments eventually fail. What I worry about is how to outlast it (if that even happens within our lifetimes).

    Ok, I understand now and your assessment of blacks is pretty much spot on. Savages are of limited utility and can be difficult to control once they’ve been fired up. And American blacks are about as high maintenance as you can get. As you’ve said the only way to keep them on the plantation and semi-pacified is with continued massive welfare, medicaid, section 8 and set asides like AA.

    What I worry about is how to outlast it (if that even happens within our lifetimes).

    This nation could collapse almost overnight like the former Soviet Union or it could take another 2-3 decades for things to come crashing down around us. Parasitic groups like blacks and Latinos who live largely at the good will and from wealth and productivity generated by whites will see their birthrates implode and we could see those two groups victimizing each other in large numbers.

    But the white birthrate is barely at replacement level so it will be very hard to outlast cultural Marxism and the sweeping demographic changes if we won’t reproduce. It’s just a simple matter of math and time. Therefore, it’s in our interest for the central government to collapse or become feeble so as to allow racially conscious whites to regroup and form ethnostates since the status quo will lead to genocide. By design.

    Read More
  109. Liberalism is the religion of the looney left. Their God is Bernie Sanders, assisted by a cabal of enablers namely all other prominent Jews like George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg, the Jew York Times, the two Jewgle founders, Chuck Schumer, Diane Feinstein, Gary Cohn, and all the Jews in Wall Street, Silicon Valley, the media, academia and Hollywood.

    The SJWs are their useful idiots, the youth branch, equivalent to Hitler’s Brown Coats or Mao’s Red Guards.

    Antifa and BLM are their ISIS, the militant wing readily deployed wherever needed to beat and cow any infidel into submission.

    Read More
  110. Steve Bannon gave an interview to Charlie Rose today and said that the GOP is the real enemy of the people. He is absolutely right. The Democrats have become the party of the FAR left since Obama, and the GOP has moved in to fill the void they left behind as the party of the Left. So now we have both parties on the left, both are in favor of amnesty, open borders, multiculturalism, same-sex marriage, drug legalization, 52 genders, big government, big brother style surveillance on citizens, more wars and more troops overseas.

    In short, both parties are now dominated by war mongering globalists.

    It’s time to merge the DNC and the GOP and call it the Globalist Party. Then we need a new party led by Steve Bannon, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Kris Kobach and call it the Nationalist Party. Then and only then can we have meaningful elections. The current two parties are both on the same side, there’s no difference who you vote for.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    In short, both parties are now dominated by war mongering globalists.

    It’s time to merge the DNC and the GOP and call it the Globalist Party. Then we need a new party led by Steve Bannon, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Kris Kobach and call it the Nationalist Party. Then and only then can we have meaningful elections. The current two parties are both on the same side, there’s no difference who you vote for.
     
    This looks a lot like an Independence Party based on the 1776 ideas of America First and the Constitution. States hold political power with the minimum delegated to Washington - with a strong bias towards avoiding foreign entanglements.

    I could see an Independence/Nationalist Party getting all the Trump voters and more, although the Ziocs would surely smear and block it every step of the way.
  111. Miro23 says:
    @The real enemy
    Steve Bannon gave an interview to Charlie Rose today and said that the GOP is the real enemy of the people. He is absolutely right. The Democrats have become the party of the FAR left since Obama, and the GOP has moved in to fill the void they left behind as the party of the Left. So now we have both parties on the left, both are in favor of amnesty, open borders, multiculturalism, same-sex marriage, drug legalization, 52 genders, big government, big brother style surveillance on citizens, more wars and more troops overseas.

    In short, both parties are now dominated by war mongering globalists.

    It's time to merge the DNC and the GOP and call it the Globalist Party. Then we need a new party led by Steve Bannon, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Kris Kobach and call it the Nationalist Party. Then and only then can we have meaningful elections. The current two parties are both on the same side, there's no difference who you vote for.

    In short, both parties are now dominated by war mongering globalists.

    It’s time to merge the DNC and the GOP and call it the Globalist Party. Then we need a new party led by Steve Bannon, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Kris Kobach and call it the Nationalist Party. Then and only then can we have meaningful elections. The current two parties are both on the same side, there’s no difference who you vote for.

    This looks a lot like an Independence Party based on the 1776 ideas of America First and the Constitution. States hold political power with the minimum delegated to Washington – with a strong bias towards avoiding foreign entanglements.

    I could see an Independence/Nationalist Party getting all the Trump voters and more, although the Ziocs would surely smear and block it every step of the way.

    Read More
  112. @Priss Factor
    I found it utterly unspeakable that a Leftist sociology professor at the University of Tampa, by name of Ken Storey, wrote via social media, that the folks in east Texas are getting what they deserved from Hurricane Harvey—because they voted for President Trump!

    It's the secular quasi-spiritual version of a Christian saying some natural disaster was punishment from God. It goes to show that the PC mindset is essentially quasi-religious. In their eyes, Texas is Sodom because it went for Trump and lags behind in worshiping the true faith of Homomania and Open Borders.

    As terrible as the professor's statement was, I don't think he should have been terminated for that. It's a matter of creed. If he really believes that, it's a personal matter. We can denounce him as a person but as a professional, he should only be judged by his competence at the college.

    Suppose someone says he believes an earthquake in San Fran is God's punishment for the homos. Many people may be appalled, but should the man be fired from his profession for his 'offensive' views?

    Priss Factor: “As terrible as the professor’s statement was, I don’t think he should have been terminated for that.”

    Sometimes, two wrongs make a right. This is one of those times.

    If Ken Storey doesn’t get fired, it means that Communists can act with carte blanche, while non-Coms can get fired for nothing. Communists must know that there are some acts that will result in their termination. Even with that, the situation in higher ed is intolerable, but let’s try and keep it from getting worse still.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
A simple remedy for income stagnation
Confederate Flag Day, State Capitol, Raleigh, N.C. -- March 3, 2007
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored