The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Karl Nemmersdorf Archive
The Life and Times of Fay Stender, Radical Attorney for the Black Panthers and Disrupter of White Social Order
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Fay Stender

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Introduction

Fay Stender earned fame as a radical attorney in the 1960s and 1970s, defending two of the most prominent Black Panthers in highly publicized court cases. During the course of her career in left-wing activism, she embraced numerous “causes” with a passion as flamboyant as it was unbalanced. She worked strictly within the stream of Jewish anti-White activism, but inside that framework her aims were essentially random, a consequence of her peculiar personality. She displayed during the course of her work a toxic combination of Jewish radicalism, selfishness, ambition, egotism, and unrestrained female emotion. The blend eventually destabilized social institutions and got people killed.

Fay was the personification of psychological intensity, a classic marker of Jewish activism. Her personality traits were etched in bold lettering. People “who knew her intimately . . . regarded her as one of the most forceful persons they had ever met.”[1]The main sources on the life of Fay Stender are David Horowitz and Peter Collier, “Requiem for a Radical” in Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About the Sixties (New York, 1990), and Lise Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra: The Life and Times of Movement Lawyer Fay Stender (Berkeley, CA: Regent Press, 2018), and American Justice on Trial: People v. Newton (Berkeley: Regent Press, 2016). The quote is from Horowitz and Collier, “Requiem for a Radical,” 24. Her sympathetic biographer mentions her “extraordinary” ego, and even her husband was appalled by her “analytic, calculating ambition.”[2]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 279; Horowitz and Collier, 28. She was “deeply typical” of the radical movement, says a fellow 1960s leftist, “the paradigmatic radical—relentlessly pushing at human limits; driven to a fine rage by perceived injustices; searching for personal authenticity in her revolutionary commitments.”[3]Horowitz and Collier, 22. Like many subversives of the 1960s, she was also a strongly identified Jew, and consciously linked the supposed values of her Jewish heritage with her social activism.

Her life story is a revealing case study in Jewish activism.

Early Life and Education

Fay Stender was born in San Francisco in 1932, into a middle-class Jewish family. Her grandparents hailed from the old country: Brest-Litovsk, Hungary, and Germany. Her father, Sam Abraham, was a chemical engineer; her mother, Ruby, was a teacher. They were a conventional family, not “political” or activist. Sam was Orthodox, but Fay and her only sibling, Lisie, were raised Reform, and they observed the Sabbath and other Jewish rites.[4]Pearlman covers Stender’s ancestry in Call Me Phaedra, 9-11.

Fay began piano lessons at four years of age, and quickly showed real talent. By the time she entered her teen years she was on track to become a concert pianist. She earned the privilege of performing Beethoven’s Emperor Concerto with the San Francisco Symphony when she was just fourteen years old.

Not long afterward, she rebelled against her rigorous schedule. She wasn’t happy with her stunted social life (she was attending private school to maximize practice time); she demanded to be allowed to attend Berkeley High School with her friend Hilde Stern. She also wanted to reduce her practice time. Her parents submitted only after much argument. She did not fit in very well in high school, however, because Hilde’s circle of friends considered her arrogant. She was “a loner, restless and impatient with frivolity.”[5]Horowitz and Collier, 25. She read much in her spare time and made the National Honor Society.

Fay and her family evinced a good deal of neurosis. Her mother was “controlling” and “tended toward hypochondria,” frequently dragging Fay around to doctors and imposing unnecessary therapies on her. Fay herself suffered periods of serious depression throughout her life, and may have suffered from bipolar disorder.[6]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 11-12. She also enjoyed provoking authority. At public institutions, she would open doors marked “private” and boldly entering, implicitly challenging the White social order.

At seventeen, Fay followed Hilde Stern to Portland, Oregon, to study English at Reed College. Reed had a reputation as left wing and iconoclastic. Fay reveled in her freedom from parental control, and began dating for the first time. She was, like many young people, almost painfully idealistic. A letter of advice to her younger sister featured this earnest impression: “The real meaning of life is in three things, love, beauty and pain. And these three are all really one which is God or Truth. And you will only come to know and understand this by giving, and giving too much.”[7]Ibid., 32.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 11-12.)

A young Fay Stender at Reed College
A young Fay Stender at Reed College

Jewish idealism does not frown upon unorthodox modes of sexual expression. Sex is also, of course, a well-known tool of revolutionaries. In her sophomore year she fell for a youthful professor, Stanley Moore, a womanizing Communist with a taste for bondage (Fay’s biographer Lise Pearlman describes the relationship as “sado-masochistic.”[8]Ibid., 91-2.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 11-12.)
) Moore turned her strongly to the left and “convinced her to reject her cloistered upbringing and bourgeois Jewish values.”[9]Ibid., 37, 40.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 11-12.)
It began to dawn on Fay that “there was something wrong with this country, something I wanted to change.”[10]Perry, Douglas. “Why Reedie and radical lawyer Fay Stender fought for prison reform — and paid with her life,” The Oregonian, June 27, 2015. Viewed September 14, 2017: http://www.oregonlive.com/living/index.ssf/2015/06/...r.html She quickly embraced radical ideas, a rare example of a Gentile converting a Jew to revolution.

In her junior year she transferred to the University of California at Berkeley. There she befriended a fellow student, Chinese immigrant Betty Lee, and, talking “a million miles a minute,” “passionately expounded on Communism, racism and imperialism.”[11]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 37. Her knowledge of these issues must have been superficial, but her passion wasn’t. She was vocal enough with her new beliefs that the FBI opened a file on her and Betty as suspected Communists.[12]Ibid., 44. Betty went on to become a radical member of the Berkeley City Council.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 37.)
The FBI would track Fay through much of her life.

Law School

At this point, Fay decided to become a lawyer; she felt the profession commanded influence. Her ambition fired, she took extra courses and graduated early (January 1953) with honors. She won a scholarship to the University of Chicago Law School, which was considered one of the best in the country at the time, at least by progressives. It was a center of “Legal Realism,” which was the idea “that the law was a flexible tool which balanced competing interests to accomplish particular public goals,” that is, liberal goals. The school had a large number of Jewish students and professors, in a city with the world’s third largest community of Jews.[13]Ibid., 47, 49. Bernardine Dohrn of the Weathermen would later obtain a J.D. from this school.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 37.)

At this time very few women attended law school, and even fewer graduated. It was the almost universal belief within the profession that women lacked the emotional stability to become good trial lawyers; Stender’s career would provide tragic backing for that belief.

Fay entered the school that fall on the lookout for an outlet for activism. She was already alert to the plight of the “oppressed” and “disadvantaged.” She was aware that the school was surrounded by the Black ghetto of Chicago and gave visiting friends tours along its streets.[14]Horowitz and Collier, 26. George Jackson, the Black convict with whom her fate later became entwined, was then a budding thug on those very streets.

In her first semester, Fay attended a meeting of the National Lawyers Guild (NLG). There she met the president of the student chapter, Marvin Stender, a third-year law student and native of Chicago. He was a tall, earnest, true-believing leftist. They quickly fell in love and married, a match described as “a relationship both saw as a joint venture on behalf of the oppressed.”[15]Ibid., 26.
(Horowitz and Collier, 26.)
Her parents were happy she finally settled upon—after many dalliances with Gentiles—a member of the tribe.

Fay and Marvin threw themselves into cauldron of leftist politics. Fay was “finding it increasingly difficult to suppress her disapproval of how the law aided the haves over the have nots.”[16]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 69. Fay assisted Professor Malcolm Sharp, president of the NLG, who was working on an appeal for Jewish atomic spy Morton Sobell. The NLG, a Communist front organization, would be the base of their activism throughout their lives. Marvin worked with Jewish Professor Hans Zeisel on a landmark study of trials and juries (The American Jury) that would have the effect of opening up juries to the machinations of identity politics, an opening that Fay later exploited, perverting justice and destabilizing institutions.[17]Ibid., 68. Zeisel’s work “later played a key role in assuring a diverse and sympathetic jury for the Huey Newton murder trial.”
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 69.)
They both raised funds for the Rosenberg boys and worked on the electoral campaign of Congressman (and eventual judge and Bill Clinton presidential advisor) Abner Mikva.[18]Ibid., 68.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 69.)
Their activism was always aligned with the Jewish current.

The Stenders and their friends had closely followed the Rosenberg case, which had reached a jolting conclusion that summer of 1953. They watched the McCarthy hearings and cheered when in the spring of 1954 Army chief counsel Joseph Welch dramatically confronted Joseph McCarthy—“Have you no sense of decency, sir?”—in defense of a National Lawyers Guild member.[19]Ibid., 59.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 69.)

Early Career in Berkeley

In the summer of 1956, Fay obtained her law degree, finishing in the top third of her class. She prevailed upon Marvin to move to the Bay Area. There Fay got a position clerking for an elderly Gentile judge on the California Supreme Court, but was horrified to learn he supported anti-miscegenation laws. He was sexist too, so she quit. She and Marvin wanted to work for NLG stalwarts Barney Dreyfus and Charles Garry, the two most prominent Leftist lawyers on the West Coast, but they were facing subpoenas from the House Un-American Activities Committee at the time. They steered Fay to a Black lawyer, and she spent some time defending Black prostitutes, at least until her new boss was disbarred for perjury. Here she enlightened one dark corner of racist America: she “convinced judges to order the same lenient sentences as white prostitutes routinely received.”[20]Ibid., 74-7.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 69.)
Are we to believe that the judges upholding the stern monolith of White supremacy saw the error of their ways merely because of the honeyed suasion of the young Jewish lawyer?

In September 1957, President Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock, Arkansas, to enforce racial integration in the schools there. Fay would spend much of her career working in the civil rights movement.

In 1958, Fay gave birth to a son, Neal, and in early 1960, a girl, Oriane. She stayed home with them for three years even though “she could not keep up with the demands of motherhood and had no desire to manage a household.”[21]Ibid., 80.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 69.)
She was depressed; after all, she had a deeply racist and sexist society to set right. Worse, Marvin chose this time to begin an affair. Fay moved out of their house and rented an apartment. She still thought fondly of Stanley Moore—“obsession” is the word used by her biographer—and considered reuniting with him.[22]Ibid., 81-2.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 69.)

Yet even as a full-time mother, Fay found time to agitate. Her new focus on children, as grudging it was, opened another part of American society to her gaze. Over the past century or so, activist Jews like Fay have relentlessly dragged every aspect of human society into the sphere of political agitation, usually with disastrous results. For a change, however, her work here had positive results. She advocated for natural home birth and breast-feeding, and successfully brought suit to change a California law that barred husbands from the delivery rooms of hospitals. She donated her time to help young mothers learn how to navigate the passage of childbirth, earning the devotion of a number of these women.

Working for Garry and Dreyfus

In 1961, Fay again asked Charles Garry for a job. This time he gave her a part-time position. Garry was Armenian; his main partner, Barney Dreyfus, was the product of an Irish-Jewish marriage. Both men were NLG members and former Communists. For decades they were at the center of most of the groundbreaking radical court cases in the Bay Area. Fay also gained entry to their social circle, particularly the group around leftist Jewish lawyer Bob Treuhaft and his wife Jessica Mitford, both also former Communists. (Most former Communists didn’t repudiate their ideology, needless to say, only the stifling party discipline.) The couple had connections galore, and “threw the best Leftist parties around.”[23]Ibid., 82-8. In 1971, Hilary Rodham would clerk for the former Communist Treuhaft.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 69.)
A decade later, Fay and Jessica would work together on prison reform in California.

Fay joined the San Francisco branch of the NLG, of which Dreyfus was the long-time president. A couple years later he would take over the national organization, and place “civil rights” at the top of the agenda.[24]Ibid., 96.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 69.)

Fay mainly did research for the firm, filing motions or working on appeals; Garry did not consider her capable of trying cases in a courtroom. Her new bosses quickly learned that Fay would relentlessly pursue every possible angle to help win a case. She would identify herself totally with a case, even a minor one, as if it were a deeply important cause. Finally the firm allowed her and another lawyer to take charge of a case at trial, one they considered a loser. Fay promptly violated courtroom etiquette by challenging a routine police test, and waved her hands about “to underscore her arguments.” The judge was “unimpressed” and they lost.[25]Ibid., 90.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 69.)

In 1963, still separated from Marvin (but not divorced), she re-connected with another lover from Reed, Bob Richter, for periodic nights together; this arrangement would last for eighteen years.[26]Ibid., 90-91.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 69.)
She also saw a number of other men, including Stanley Moore. At the same time, she and Marvin enjoyed occasional pastimes together with the children.

Fay by this time reversed her earlier repudiation, however deep it may have been, of her Jewish heritage. She wanted her children to grow up Jewish. Every year her parents held a large family Passover Seder, and Fay usually attended. Now she brought her children too. Fay wanted them to “benefit from . . . the Torah’s ideals of justice and freedom.” (Ah yes, the Torah’s well-known ideals . . .)[27]Rabbi Yosef Ovadia, former Chief Rabbi of Israel and head of the Council of Torah Sages: “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world . . .” See also Kevin MacDonald’s comments here.

Civil Rights Activism: Freedom Summer

By 1963, Marvin and Fay were following the burgeoning civil rights movement with growing excitement. They joined with others to form the East Bay Friends of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), which became a major fund-raiser for the national organization. The SNCC had grown out of the 1960 sit-in movement, meant to function as a student arm of the civil rights movement. Fay, Marvin and their (Jewish) friends held “hundreds” of fund-raising events over the next few years.[28]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 95.

That fall, SNCC announced a summer campaign for 1964 to register Blacks to vote in Mississippi. SNCC chose Mississippi because it was the most militantly segregationist state.[29]Kenneth Heineman, Put Your Bodies Upon the Wheels: Student Revolt in the 1960s (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2001), 36. The activists desired drama and clashes, and counted on shocking publicity like Bull Connor’s firehoses and dogs to help accomplish their agenda.[30]Connor was the Chief of Police in Birmingham, Alabama, who used dogs and firehoses to break up civil rights demonstrations in May 1963. The resulting publicity produced widespread disgust and led to the first Civil Rights Act in July 1964. The effort was labelled “Freedom Summer.” Jews across the nation thrilled with excitement; an offensive against the most recalcitrant, racist White bastion was about to begin. (The Jewish liberal Allard Lowenstein shared responsibility for the idea.)[31]Bruce Watson, Freedom Summer: The Savage Season of 1964 That Made Mississippi Burn and Made America a Democracy (New York: Penguin Books, 2010), 63. Almost two-thirds of the approximately 900 White volunteers for Freedom Summer were Jewish.[32]Jonathan Kaufman, Broken Alliance: The Turbulent Times Between Blacks and Jews in America (New York: Touchstone, 1995), 98. It was a movement closely aligned with radical Jewish sensibilities: a majority of the White volunteers “had parents affiliated with the Communist party and other Marxist organizations,” and the event “underscored SNCC’s declining religiosity and growing identification with sexual liberation and revolutionary communism.”[33]Heineman, Put Your Bodies Upon the Wheels, 37, 39. The original Christian pacifism of SNCC had rapidly turned into something quite different under the influence of its new “White” associates.

In early June 1964, Fay signed up to provide free legal help for the SNCC activists. She arrived in Jackson, Mississippi on August 10 for a short stint. Tensions in Mississippi were sky high when Fay arrived; the natives correctly regarded the coming of the Northern radicals as an invasion meant to break down their social structure; local papers often referred to “race-mixing invaders.”[34]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 97. Bruce Watson refers to Freedom Summer volunteers as “invaders” more than a dozen times. Less than a week before, the corpses of civil rights activists Michael Schwerner, Andrew Goodman, and James Chaney had been discovered buried in an earthen dam only eighty miles away; angry locals had killed them.[35]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 97. Schwerner and Goodman were—of course—New York Jews; Chaney was a Black Mississippian.

One aspect of Freedom Summer that still evokes very painful memories from many White participants is interracial strife, particularly concerning sex. This issue ties in with Fay Stender’s later career as prison reformer, as we will see. There was a great deal of sexual coercion on the part of Black men, who could be “persistent and aggressive,” with “scarcely veiled hostility.”[36]Mary Aickin Rothschild, A Case of Black and White: Northern Volunteers and the Southern Freedom Summers, 1964-1965 (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1982), 138-39. At the orientation of the White volunteers, a Black staff member had frankly warned of the possibility of rape: “The only way . . . a Negro man has been able to express his manhood is sexually and so you find a tremendous sexual aggressiveness . . . so, in a sense, what passes itself off as desire quite often . . . is probably a combination of hostility and resentment, because he resents what the society has done to him, and he wants to take it out on somebody who symbolizes the establishment . . .”[37]Rothschild, A Case of Black and White, 138. If a woman was strong enough to resist, “she generally became a focus for the hostility of the black men on the project.”[38]Ibid, 139.
(Rothschild, A Case of Black and White, 138.)

By the end of Freedom Summer, Whites and Blacks had gotten a handle on each other—a strongly negative one. Blacks viewed whites—usually Jews—as “smug, superior, [and] condescending,” and Whites labelled Blacks with such terms as “slow,” “lazy,” or “bullshitting Negroes.”[39]Bruce Watson, Freedom Summer, 267. So much for the idea that interaction reduces bigotry.

Thus we see, according to Jewish author Debra Schultz, why it is “extremely difficult to talk about interracial sex in the southern civil rights movement.”[40]Debra Schultz, Going South: Jewish Women in the Civil Rights Movement (New York: New York University Press, 2001), 115. The White women went through sexual hell, hard enough in itself to discuss, but they also didn’t want to air atrocious Black behavior, which would tend to discredit the movement. Very few of them were prepared to reconsider the basis of their activism, so silence was their only option. When Fay Stender finished working for Black rights, she didn’t want to talk about it, either.

 

Legal Work for the Movement

When she returned to Berkeley, Fay “felt energized.”[41]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 98. So did other returnees. Mario Savio, fresh from Mississippi, launched the Free Speech Movement (FSM) at UC Berkeley that fall, kicking off the wider radical crusade of the 1960s. When the police began to clear Sproul Hall of protesting students in the early morning of December 3, Bob Treuhaft was the first one arrested; he had been called by Savio and arrived just in time for the bust.[42]When protestor Joe Blum reached Santa Rita prison after dawn, he heard a voice call out, “Hey Joe! How many of you motherfuckers are coming out here?” It was his friend from Merritt College, Huey Newton, in prison for assault. From Hugh Pearson, The Shadow of the Panther (Addison Wesley, 1994), 73. The Free Speech Movement—surprise—was every bit as Jewish as Freedom Summer. The occupiers of Sproul Hall held a Hanukkah service during the sit-in, and the biggest base of support for the radicals came from the Jews in the student body.[43]Arthur Liebman, Jews and the Left (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979), 68. Fay “relished seeing the Berkeley campus develop into a hotbed of Movement fervor.”[44]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 98. The fact that it was a Jewish movement was presumably a source of pride for her, given her strong Jewish identity.

The arrestees called for legal help and Fay jumped into action. Her energy at times like this could be awe-inspiring, and the FSM members “secretly fell in love with her.”[45]Ibid., 100.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 98.)
Over the years, many people would describe Fay as attractive, intelligent, and generous, especially when she could immerse herself in a cause. She helped arrange for bail and performed other legal work in a blur of activity.

Shortly afterward, Fay held a Seder (a ceremonial Passover dinner) for SNCC personnel at her home. She “incorporated into it references to Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Civil Rights Movement.”[46]Ibid., 100-01.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 98.)
This was fitting because the Jews had invested heavily in the movement; indeed, they had generally succeeded in guiding the direction of the civil rights campaign from the time they initiated the NAACP in 1909.[47]See Kevin MacDonald, “Jews, Blacks, and Race” here, and E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History, Chapter 16.

Fay had another reason to feel good in the spring of 1965. She and Marvin reunited and leased a house in the Berkeley flats. They made their home a haven for movement friends, who were excited by yet another looming cause: the Vietnam War. (No rest for the wicked.) They plunged into an effort to help young men resisting the draft and others demonstrating against the war.[48]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 101-02. Fay, Marvin, and their lawyer friends Peter Franck and Aryay Lenske set up the Council for Justice (CFJ) to provide legal services for the entire range of leftist causes. The Executive Committee of the CFJ included Beverly Axelrod, who would soon make Eldridge Cleaver famous.[49]Ibid., 102. Franck is Jewish; so was Axelrod.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 101-02.)

The CJF didn’t last long, but not to worry; there is always another cause, another front in the war against White society. Sure enough, one soon appeared, one that carried a menacing—murderous, even—revolutionary swagger, so calculated to set Jewish hearts aflutter. Better yet, this group was Black, and so would be entirely dependent upon Jewish brains and money.

Eldridge Cleaver and the Revolutionary Glorification of Black Criminality

In the wake of Freedom Summer and the racial rancor it generated within the civil rights movement, more pugnacious Blacks rose to ascendancy in SNCC and other civil rights organizations. Stokely Carmichael became chairman of SNCC in May 1966, and quickly repudiated civil disobedience. He embraced “Black Power” and Black separatism, and by the end of the year he expelled Whites from the SNCC. A position paper worked up to explain the move stated, “All White people are racists.”[50]Heineman, 42. Jewish revolutionaries were outraged; one cited Jewish support of civil rights organizations and their “strategic role in organizing and funding the struggle,” and concluded “it was clear to everyone that [Jews] were the primary target” of Carmichael’s new racial militancy.[51]David Horowitz, Radical Son: A Generational Odyssey (New York: The Free Press, 1997), 227. Jews can get awfully sensitive when their revolutionary proxies get it into their heads to steer their own way.

It was in this context that the Black Panthers appeared in the Bay Area in October 1966. The Black Panthers reviled the “White power structure” but were open to alliances with White radicals. Jewish leftists immediately connected with their movement. Advocacy for the Panthers would become the dramatic climax of Fay’s career. She would throw herself into the maelstrom of pro-Panther activism with total incomprehension of their true nature, just like many other Jewish revolutionaries.

We begin with Eldridge Cleaver, because his career was so largely a Jewish creation, and provides necessary background for Fay’s new endeavor. In1966 Cleaver was doing time for attempted rape and attempted murder. His infamous predilection for violating White women would soon be broadcast by Jewish publicists. He read politics and history in prison, but his ideas crystallized upon reading George Breitman’s book, Last Year of Malcolm X: The Evolution of a Revolutionary. Breitman, a Jew, depicted Malcolm at the end of his life as less a religious leader than a socialist revolutionary. “The Malcolm X of the Breitman book went far beyond seeing racism as a flaw in the hearts of the American people. It was endemic to the nation’s economic system, a necessary feature of capitalism. The whole structure had to go.”[52]Eric Cummins, The Rise and Fall of California’s Radical Prison Movement (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994), 97. The book impacted Black inmates “like a lightning strike.” They now spurned mere reform or talk of civil rights; “[t]here was nothing to be gained by trying to fit in. The very structure of the society would have to be razed.” Cleaver was the inmate “who followed this line of thought most closely.”[53]All quotes from Cummins, 97. A Jew thus lit yet another spark for Black revolution.

From prison, Cleaver managed to contact Beverly Axelrod, a Jewish lawyer and veteran radical. He hoped that he could pay her legal fees with his writing, and she could win his parole. Axelrod smuggled forbidden literature into prison for Cleaver, and he gave her his numerous tracts, which she sent to Norman Mailer, whose 1957 essay “The White Negro” reminded more than one critic of Cleaver’s scribblings. With Mailer’s enthusiastic approval, she was able to get Ramparts magazine, soon to become the most prominent publication of the New Left, to publish selections.[54]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 113. Robert Scheer, editor at Ramparts (son of a Russian Jewess and a German Gentile), also helped place Cleaver’s work in the magazine; his role would become big enough to earn the description of “perhaps the key person to launch the career of Eldridge Cleaver.”[55]Hugh Pearson, The Shadow of the Panther, 104. Eldridge Cleaver was a Jewish creation, and the Jews were on their way to replacing the SNCC as their controlled vehicle of social demolition.[56]“Cleaver . . . would do more than anyone else to facilitate Huey Newton’s Black Panther Party replacing SNCC as the national symbol of Black disenchantment.” Pearson, 104.

In August 1966, Ramparts published Eldridge’s “Letters from Prison,” which included this famous passage: “Rape was an insurrectionary act. It delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon the White man’s law, upon his system of values, and that I was defiling his women.”[57]Peter Richardson, A Bomb in Every Issue: How the Short, Unruly Life of Ramparts Magazine Changed America (New York: The New Press, 2009), 69-70. Whatever Beverly Axelrod thought of this passage, it didn’t stop her from falling in love with him. By the time she got him out on parole at the end of 1966, they were lovers and planned to marry. Cleaver’s book Soul on Ice came out in the spring of 1967. The book “whipped tough cultural observations in with a froth of sexual lore, and the result was a violence-steeped Maileresque Black sexual-political myth …”[58]Cummins, California’s Radical Prison Movement, 100. It featured letters to and from Beverly and was dedicated to her, “with whom I share the ultimate of love.”[59]Richardson, A Bomb in Every Issue, 121. Jewish media sources received it rapturously; the lefty Jewish critic Maxwell Geismar in his introduction to the book wrote that Cleaver was “simply one of the best cultural critics writing today.”[60]Ibid., 122-23. Cleaver’s warden from San Quentin had a different view of his writing. He thought it was “racist as hell, talking about the White honkies and death to the White man and that sort of thing . . . I consider[ed] it garbage, the words of a diseased mind.” (from Cummins, 98.)
(Richardson, A Bomb in Every Issue, 121.)

Cleaver could portray his crimes as politically motivated all he wanted, but without Jewish publicists, it would have amounted to nothing. Because he was able to gain the ear of radical Jews, the myth of the criminal-as-revolutionary was born: “crime . . . became a revolutionary challenge to the state.”[61]Cummins, 103. This idea—putting the final touch on a dangerous concoction—created “room for criminal male violence in the ideology of the New Left.”[62]Cummins, 103. A direct path was laid down to domestic revolutionary violence and terrorism. It led in a straight line from the Black Panthers, to the Weathermen, the Symbionese Liberation Army, and now, Antifa.

Huey Newton and Fay Stender

At a party celebrating the publication of Soul on Ice, Fay Stender met Cleaver and toasted his engagement to Axelrod.[63]Lise Pearlman, American Justice, 110-11. (The engagement would not last long; Cleaver soon abandoned her for a much younger woman. Cleaver later admitted that he used Axelrod, eleven years his senior, to get out of prison.) It was through Axelrod that Fay would become involved in the case that made her famous.

However, Fay was depressed again. She was no closer to a full partnership in the firm of Garry & Dreyfus; she mostly did research for the “name” partners. She was envious of Beverly Axelrod, the toast of the radical community, and Marvin had embarked upon yet another affair. She needed a new cause. As it happened, it wasn’t long in coming: in the early morning hours of October 28, 1967, the thuggish founder of the Black Panthers, Huey Newton, murdered John Frey.

Oakland police officer John Frey had pulled over a vehicle with Newton and a friend inside. Ten minutes later Frey was dying of five bullet wounds, two in the back from close range.[64]Horowitz and Collier, 29. An hour later Newton showed up at Kaiser Hospital with a gunshot wound in his abdomen. There the cops caught up to him; so did Charles Garry and Fay Stender. Eldridge Cleaver, who had joined the Panthers after his release from prison and now stepped up as leader, had called Axelrod for help and she called Garry.[65]Pearlman, American Justice, 133. Fay “would never forget the impact of seeing Huey Newton lying half-naked under armed guard. . . . At first sight, she felt a strong sexual attraction.”[66]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 118. Her depression vanished; she “instantly realized this might be the career break she was looking for.” She would be at the center of the “hottest Movement case around”: a capital murder trial for a Black man “struggling” against the “racist” American system.[67]Pearlman, American Justice, 110.

Huey Newton in Beverly Axelrod’s apartment, 1967. Props by Cleaver.
Huey Newton in Beverly Axelrod’s apartment, 1967. Props by Cleaver.

Fay wasn’t the only turned-on radical. Newton (who reportedly had a Jewish grandfather[68]Pearson, 292.) and the Panthers had already gotten major press coverage; less than three months before Frey’s murder, Israeli-born Sol Stern had done a write-up on the Panthers for New York Times Magazine (August 6). This was the first exposure the Panthers had received in the mainstream press. “Stern had asked Newton if he was truly prepared to kill a police officer; Newton replied that he was.” Stern couldn’t help concluding that, for the Panthers, “the execution of a police officer would be as natural . . . as the execution of a German soldier by a member of the French Resistance.”[69]Richardson, 92-3. Stern probably knew the “French Resistance” was largely Jewish; see “Was the French Resistance Jewish?” in the Tablet: https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/bo...jewish In the immediate aftermath of the killing of Frey, the underground newspaper Berkeley Barb (owned and run by the Jew Max Scherr[70]See here for Scherr.), which had been covering the Panthers steadily since early 1967, “hastily concluded” that the Newton case was a “clear case of police provocation” and declared him a political prisoner.[71]Cummins, 113-14. The Barb would continue to cover Newton’s case full-blast.

Many radicals believed that Newton had killed Frey, and hoped it presaged a real revolution.

Fay would assist Garry in the case, along with Barney Dreyfus and another partner, Alex Hoffmann, a diminutive Viennese Jew. Garry planned a “super-aggressive defense . . . raising every possible factual and legal issue,” with a maximum of publicity to arouse sympathy for Newton.[72]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 119. Fay, who had virtually no experience in criminal trials, would do research and write motions and briefs that challenged everything that might lead to plausible grounds for a subsequent appeal. Garry would conduct the trial in the courtroom. Nevertheless, the case looked very bad for the defense; everything pointed to Newton having an electrifying end to his career.

Garry planned to put the “racist” American system on trial and the prosecutor on the defensive. Lise Pearlman describes it as the first “Movement trial”; the Chicago Seven Trial was yet to come.[73]Pearlman, American Justice, 112, 136. The Panthers and their White backers would mount large demonstrations around the courthouse at each pre-trial hearing and all through the trial, and the leftwing press and its Jewish scribes would provide fawning coverage.

The Panthers at the time of Frey’s death numbered only about a dozen people. With a cause célèbre like Newton imprisoned in a racially explosive murder case, Blacks flocked to the Party. Within eighteen months, there were over forty chapters around the country with 5,000 members. Their paper, The Black Panther, launched in Beverly Axelrod’s apartment, grew to a circulation of over 100,000.[74]Ibid., 38.
(Pearlman, American Justice, 112, 136.)
Newton, many remarked, was more valuable in prison, a likely martyr, than free.

The prosecutor quickly obtained an indictment from a grand jury. Fay and Barney Dreyfus immediately prepared a constitutional challenge to the composition of the jury, because it was too White. It didn’t reflect a “cross-section of the community.”[75]Ibid., 117-18.
(Pearlman, American Justice, 112, 136.)
They invested immense effort and time on this angle. (Their argument would fail; they would appeal; again denied.[76]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 121.) This, together with their later agitation against the composition of the trial jury, would have the terrible effect of making juries and the judicial process subject to identity politics, and lead to rampant Black juror sabotage of criminal cases against Blacks.

In January 1968, Fay began visiting Newton regularly in the Alameda County Jail. She was “delighted at his warm reception,”[77]Ibid., 122.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 121.)
and began dressing more attractively, with makeup, on her visits. She was “but one of a growing number of his new female devotees.”[78]Pearlman, American Justice, 151. Newton was able to bamboozle her completely. He told her he learned to read after high school by repeatedly attempting Plato’s Republic. She in turn shared personal details with him, and was soon panting, “he is truly a great man. Huey is a loving, gentle, kind person . . . He has a righteous force, a fierce combination of moral outrage and anger.”[79]Ibid., 151.
(Pearlman, American Justice, 151.)
What is this but pure female emotion, utterly duped by radical ideology and a dangerous but charming poseur?

In late February 1968, the government released the Kerner Report. It infamously blamed White racism for Black failure and the Black inner-city riots of the preceding few years, providing top-level government backing for the claim that Huey Newton’s actions were simply the result of frustration with oppression.

Five weeks later, after a night of whoring in Memphis, the Reverend Martin Luther King met God, unexpectedly.[80]In his book And the Walls Came Tumbling Down, Ralph Abernathy, close associate of Martin Luther King, testifies that King spent time with two women that night, neither one his wife, and beat up a third. See http://articles.latimes.com/1989-11-12/books/bk-188...athy/2 In protest, Blacks across the nation attacked and burned down their own communities.[81]After the Watts riots in August 1965, in which the Blacks of Los Angeles had destroyed much of their community, they nevertheless felt that they had “had chastised the White power structure.” Heineman, 41. President Johnson had to call in 13,000 troops to quell the violence and arson in Washington, D.C. Amidst the excitement, Eldridge Cleaver gathered four carloads of heavily armed Panthers and set out to “off” some “pigs” and “stoke the image of [the Panthers] as the future revolutionary vanguard.”[82]Pearson, 154. A shootout ensued. Police killed one Panther and hauled Cleaver off to prison. Cleaver insisted he and the Panthers were innocently “preparing a picnic” for the morrow.[83]Pearson, 155. “To the Bastille!” brayed the Berkeley Barb at this “police outrage.” Susan Sontag and Norman Mailer, among others, demanded Cleaver’s release.[84]Cummins, 121.

Meanwhile, Fay worked round the clock on the case. She attended Panther meetings, read books that Huey assigned her, and prepared motions. When the state rejected her challenge of the grand jury, she assembled a panel of sociologists to help her strategize for the trial. This was “a novel concept. Today professional jury consultants are often used in high profile . . . cases . . . but back then the use of sociologists . . . was pioneering.”[85]Pearlman, American Justice, 161-62. They specifically sought ways to shape a jury to their liking, i.e., one with as many minorities as possible. Fay reached out to David Wellman, a friend and movement journalist who was working on a Ph.D. in “race relations” at Berkeley. He brought his colleagues Bob Blauner, a “confirmed Marxist,” Professor Jan Dizard, and Dr. Bernard Diamond to meet with Fay.[86]Ibid., 177.
(Pearlman, American Justice, 161-62.)
Fay and her “experts” prepared hundreds of questions that Charles Garry could ask prospective jurors to root out racial “bias.” This is another example showing that outsiders or Jews will not play by the “gentleman’s rules” that bind together a homogeneous high-trust society. They literally act as a social corrosive.

Garry and Fay knew full well that their chances of winning an acquittal, or a hung jury, rested on whether they could seat Blacks on the jury. Did they really think that Blacks would judge the evidence with greater acumen and dispassion than middle-class Whites? Not bloody likely. They were well aware that minorities on juries were prone to siding with their racial brothers at the expense of facts.[87]Ibid., 217.
(Pearlman, American Justice, 161-62.)
Garry wanted “to create the impression that every member of a minority group would understand his client’s perspective better than Whites, but he knew better” [emphasis added].[88]Ibid., 223.
(Pearlman, American Justice, 161-62.)
He knew many Blacks in Oakland did not view the Panthers positively. He was banking on naked racial solidarity to spring a murderer and increase his own fame. Did Fay think of the implications of their strategy? Or did she simply accept the idea that Newton was justified in his actions because of White racism?

The Newton Trial

The trial began with jury selection on July 15, 1968. Judge Monroe Friedman presided. The prosecutor was the tall, courtly, almost ridiculously decent Lowell Jensen. Even Pearlman points out the contrast in style and behavior between the prosecution and the defense; it was exactly what one might expect between a WASP and a group consisting mostly of Jews.[89]Ibid., 215.
(Pearlman, American Justice, 161-62.)

Security for the trial was unprecedented. Outside, Panthers and thousands of supporters marched, chanted, and screamed. Some held signs reading, “The Nation Shall be Reduced to Ashes, the Sky’s the Limit if Anything Happens to Huey.”[90]Pearson, 167. It was blatant intimidation of the judge and jury, orchestrated by the radicals, and should never have been permitted.

For three days, Fay trotted out her experts to explain to Judge Friedman how biased Whites were: Jan Dizard, Bob Blauner, Alex Hoffmann, Dr. Sanford (one of the authors of The Authoritarian Personality), Dr. Diamond, and even Hans Zeisel from Chicago.[91]Pearlman, American Justice, 210-13. It is hard to see how the affair could have been more Jewish; only Dizard and Sanford were Gentiles. The judge denied most of the defense’s requests, but did permit a longer questioning period for possible jurors. Questioning of the jury pool then took nearly three excruciating weeks. One defense strategy ironically backfired; most Blacks stated under oath that they couldn’t impose the death penalty under any conditions, and Jensen logically proceeded to exclude them, greatly reducing the number of Blacks who could sit on the jury. Both Fay and Garry had actually hoped that minorities would lie about their feelings on the death penalty so they could be seated and vote against death, if it came to that.[92]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 126. The fact that the defense assumed they would lie, and that they were eager to profit from it, says everything we need to know about their ethics. Such are the imperatives of tikkun olam.

The jury seated five minorities, including one Black man. Jensen, fair to a fault, didn’t strive to exclude minorities just because they were minorities.

The defense put Newton, a good speaker, on the stand. He denied shooting Frey. Then, with Garry prompting him, he “talked at length . . . about hundreds of years of oppression,” over the objections of Jensen, because Judge Friedman “was fascinated” by the history lesson.[93]Pearlman, American Justice, 284-85. Newton, of course, had no direct knowledge of “hundreds of years” of oppression; his “testimony” was totally extraneous to the case. Newton swore that the Panthers were committed to nonviolence, at virtually the same moment protestors outside were chanting, “Revolution has come – Time to pick up your gun,” and “Off the pigs.”[94]Ibid., 286.
(Pearlman, American Justice, 284-85.)

The Black juror, David Harper, “found himself profoundly affected” when Newton testified about racism in American society.[95]Ibid., 327.
(Pearlman, American Justice, 284-85.)

When cross-examined by Jensen, Newton claimed that Officer Frey had been rough with him, called him “nigger,” and pushed him; he fell, Frey pulled his gun, and Newton felt a hot flash on his stomach. He claimed he remembered nothing more.[96]Ibid., 287-88.
(Pearlman, American Justice, 284-85.)
Garry brought Dr. Diamond to the stand to testify that soldiers shot in the stomach commonly experience amnesia and unconsciousness.[97]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 130-31.

Jensen’s final remarks included a “chilling” account of the killing. Only Newton could have fired the fatal shots, he concluded. Garry then closed. He compared Newton to Christ and invoked both the Holocaust and the Armenian genocide. With tears in his eyes, he embraced Newton and implored the jury to find him innocent.[98]Pearlman, American Justice, 298-302.

During jury deliberations, the lone Black man and a Cuban held out for acquittal. Finally they compromised by opting for a verdict of manslaughter. It was a “stunning” victory for the defense, but it left Fay and Alex Hoffmann devastated (Pearlman speculates that Hoffmann, a homosexual, may have been in love with Newton).[99]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, xiv. Newton was sentenced to two to fifteen years, under the “indeterminate” sentencing law. It was an outrageous violation of justice, worked by Jews and non-Whites at the expense of a White policeman and White society. The demoralization of White society consequent upon such a violation of justice would be hard to calculate, but surely it would have serious and long-lasting effects.

Fay began working on the appeal the next morning. Garry was busy with other cases, and handed it over to her. She would read the 4,000-page trial transcript, and eventually write a near 200-page brief arguing for a reversal of the verdict, even though historically there was very little chance for success. She threw herself into fund-raising, recruiting celebrities to lend their names to the “Free Huey” campaign, and speaking at colleges, all with her customary full-bore intensity.[100]Pearlman, American Justice, 357-58. She also reached out to rabbis involved in civil rights work: “Fay relished making connections between her religious heritage and her current mission. In her view, Newton’s freedom should be the rabbis’ cause as well.”[101]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 143-44.

She visited Newton in prison, along with Alex Hoffmann. As his attorney, they could meet in a small room with some privacy. She felt it her duty to keep Newton’s spirits up. “She seemed . . . to be almost in love with Newton. They looked deeply at each other during her visits, sometimes touching when the guards’ attention wandered.”[102]Horowitz and Collier, 31. They did more than touch; once “a startled guard reported seeing Stender bent down apparently engaged in oral sex with Newton.”[103]Pearlman, American Justice, 358. It was a combination Fay couldn’t resist: her own powerful sexual appetite, a poor victim of brutish White racism, an intimate moment with a real revolutionary. Did she think of her husband? Her children? Venereal disease?

In the summer of 1969, Fay and Marvin took time for a trip to Europe and Israel. They “marveled at the transformation in Israel wreaked by the collective blood, sweat and tears of so many Jews.” A relative with an Uzi on his back showed them around what Lise Pearlman calls the “newly liberated” West Bank.[104]Both quotes from Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 150. Fay would later become “distanced” from other leftists over the issue of Palestine (they often denounced Israeli imperialism); she acknowledged the Arabs had a right to the land, but so did “the survivors of the Holocaust.”[105]Ibid., 336.
(Both quotes from Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 150.)

When they returned, Fay left Garry & Dreyfus and joined with Peter Franck (her old friend from the Council for Justice) in a new radical law “collective” in Berkeley: Franck, Stender, Hendon, Hill, & Ziegler. All but Hill were Jewish. Collectives were the new thing; they would have no distinctions in status or pay. Naturally, they would devote themselves to “Movement” work.

She finished her brief for Newton’s appeal in January 1970. In what amounted to a grand fishing expedition, she claimed, among other things, that the grand jury and the trial jury did not reflect Newton’s “peer group,” despite the fact that the prosecutor had not excluded minorities per se. Fay and Garry presented oral arguments on February 11. The appellate decision would come down in late May.

George Jackson and the Soledad Brothers

Meanwhile, Fay met George Jackson.

Huey Newton had told Fay about George Jackson and asked if she could help him. Jackson (whose family had relocated to California) was serving a life sentence in Soledad Prison for a $70 robbery, according to his sympathizers. The truth is a bit otherwise. He had committed a long string of muggings and burglaries, and the State of California finally wised up and sentenced the teenager to one year to life.[106]Paul Liberatore, The Road to Hell: The True Story of George Jackson, Stephen Bingham, and the San Quentin Massacre. (New York: The Atlantic Monthly Press, 1996), 15-16. He could have gotten out in a year or two, if he had behaved. He didn’t. He and a buddy formed a prison gang, ran a gambling ring, sold drugs and alcohol, and pimped homosexual prisoners.[107]Liberatore, 16-17. He fought with guards and beat other prisoners. The prison administration considered him a violent sociopath. Consequently, his sentenced was continually extended, and he spent years in solitary with his cell door welded shut.[108]Horowitz and Collier, 32.

Jackson was intelligent and could express himself well. Like Cleaver, he read revolutionary literature—Marx, Lenin, Mao, Fanon—and wrote feverishly. He believed that America’s Blacks were a “colonized” people (an idea picked up by the Weathermen); that “the country’s institutions depended on their continued enslavement and subjugation; and that this state of affairs could only be reversed by an armed, violent revolution.”[109]Max Nelson, “Extreme Remedies” in The Paris Review, December 7, 2015. Accessed November 19, 2017: https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2015/12/07/extre...edies/ While his yearning for violent revolution was genuine, he would admit that Marxism was his “hustle.”[110]Horowitz and Collier, 32. Jackson was a leader and a good organizer, and formed a group of dedicated followers.

In mid-January 1970, shortly before Newton told Fay about him, Jackson had murdered a White prison guard in cold blood. It was his response to the killing (by White prison guards) of three Blacks who were engaged in a prison-yard fight with Whites. Jackson and two others were charged with the murder and became famous—the subversive publicity machine roared into action—as the “Soledad Brothers.”

Fay visited Jackson in Soledad in early February. He spoke to her with feigned diffidence and her “heart melted.”[111]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 168. She immediately felt a strong attraction to him, and decided to take on his case. She assembled a legal team, the Soledad Brothers Defense Committee, and worked almost round the clock. Some of her friends smiled at her insistence that this undertaking was (now) the most important cause in the world.

George Jackson
George Jackson

She issued a leaflet: “Three young Black inmates . . . may soon be murdered by the State of California . . . They are innocent. Their right to a fair trial is being systematically and intentionally destroyed by the prison administration . . . They will be railroaded to the gas chamber unless we move to stop this injustice.”[112]Ibid., 173.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 168.)
It was a typical effusion from Stender: literally hysterical.

Fay interviewed many Soledad inmates in connection with the Jackson case. Few of them had knowledge of the murder but all of them had grievances to share. Fay believed every word they said, and conceived a major effort at prison reform. This reform was firmly connected in her mind with revolution. Fay was convinced the prisoners were “going to be in the vanguard of the social revolution.”[113]Horowitz and Collier, 36. She “embraced the need for social revolution [and] recognized people might die,” flippantly justifying it all: “People are dying all the time. The important thing is that they die in the right cause.”[114]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 205. She would come to regret these sentiments, but not before blood was spilled.

Newton Freed and Fay Spurned

On May 29, 1970, the appellate court decision in the Newton case was unsealed; it was a totally unexpected reversal of conviction. The court ordered a new trial, and Newton was released on bail in August.[115]Ibid., 157-58. The decision did not accept Fay’s argument about jury composition, but rather faulted the jury instructions of the judge.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 205.)
Fay, who was entirely responsible for the appeal, had sprung a murderer, and basked in the sort of fame that only subversives could value. At a party the night of his release, reveling Panthers declared that Newton needed a woman; they corralled Fay and escorted the two to a bedroom. Fay was ecstatic and later bragged about it to female colleagues, some of whom were appalled. Fay thought it meant that the Panthers viewed her as a real comrade, but Pearlman suggests that Newton simply regarded her as another woman he could use.[116]Ibid., 214-15.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 205.)
In fact, it wasn’t long before he coldly snubbed her in public, and that was that. She had spent thousands of hours laboring joyfully for a psychopathic murderer, and garnered the natural reward.

Newton in the meantime lived the high life: he hobnobbed with lefty Hollywood celebs, snorted cocaine and hosted various beautiful women in his penthouse in downtown Oakland, paid for by Jewish movie producer Bert Schneider.[117]Ibid., 223-24.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 205.)
In saving him from the electric chair, Fay would ensure that many other people would fall victim to Newton’s violence, including numerous murders that he committed personally or ordered his henchmen to carry out. Huey lingered on for years, a thug posing less and less plausibly as public benefactor, until a younger thug shot him down on the street in 1989.

Fay and Huey Newton at a press conference upon his release, August 5, 1970.
Fay and Huey Newton at a press conference upon his release, August 5, 1970.

Working for George Jackson

Meanwhile Fay worked with her customary manic energy on Jackson’s case, seventy hours a week. She brought in a lead counsel, and planned to put “the system” on trial as in the Newton case. She couldn’t see that Jackson was using her as Newton had. She raised hundreds of thousands of dollars with speeches and appeals, and chaired fund-raising events featuring Jane Fonda and Dick Gregory. She was riding high on hectic activism and fame.

It was a time heavy with portents. The Black Panther Fred Hampton had been shot dead the previous December in what was portrayed as a police assassination; Charles Garry charged the police with genocide against the Panthers; the Weathermen went underground and began bombing shortly after; in early May 1970 the Kent State shootings claimed the lives of four students amid enormous antiwar demonstrations. It seemed to many as if the system was on the point of dissolution. The revolutionaries were living day to day in a state of acute excitement, and Fay was as giddy as any of them.

Fay began collecting and editing the letters Jackson had written in prison, hoping to duplicate the success Beverly Axelrod had had with Soul on Ice. Publication would generate funds for the defense, provide favorable publicity, and promote her career. Jackson had written at length about his violent revolutionary fantasies (waging guerrilla warfare, poisoning the water supply of Chicago, taking bloody revenge on the system, etc.), but Fay deleted the worst of it because she wanted to portray him as a sympathetic victim of racism.[118]Horowitz and Collier, 37; Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 186-87. She thought she could win at trial with that strategy, but he had no faith in that avenue and was intent on a prison breakout.

She took to visiting Jackson in a miniskirt and high boots. She thought she was perfectly fit to relate to prisoners: “our interaction is more flowing, more natural, because I’m a woman. It might also be because they know I regard them as brothers and believe in them.”[119]Douglas Perry, “Why Reedie and radical lawyer Fay Stender fought for prison reform – and paid with her life,” The Oregonian, June 27, 2015. Accessed September 14, 2017: http://www.oregonlive.com/living/index.ssf/2015/06/...r.html She believed in them, all right: she began having sex with Jackson in the semi-private visiting rooms that attorneys could use, and on one occasion prison guards dragged her out half disrobed.[120]Horowitz and Collier, 36. At other times, she would embrace Jackson libidinously in front of other (appalled) lawyers, letting him rub against her “for relief.”[121]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 204 She had also initiated a lesbian affair with a young female legal assistant.

Fay recruited volunteers to help with the Jackson case as well as with other prisoners—often young female volunteers. It became a dangerous mixture of ultra-violent felons, heady social activism, and hormones. Fay actually encouraged her volunteers to “comfort” the inmates any way they could, meaning sex.[122]Ibid., 204.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 204)
And they did:

The inmates courted any woman who expressed interest in them. With few exceptions . . . the women responded like besotted rock star groupies. One guard confiscated a nude picture of a paralegal. Women legal assistants or attorneys . . . surprised the wardens when they used private conference rooms for trysts.[123]Ibid., 242.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 204)

Needless to say, Fay and her horny assistants earned the burning contempt and anger of the prison administration. Fostering the resentment of the inmates and encouraging their violent revolutionary fantasies made the California prisons a ferment of discontent. Correctional officers could see an explosion on the horizon.

The Break with Jackson

Fay’s partnership with Jackson would not last long. He had no desire to pose as a downtrodden victim in a courtroom and was planning a breakout. He had followers training for guerrilla warfare in the California hills, and planned to lead them personally in a war against America after making his escape. He thirsted for revenge against the White man. He began to demand that Fay and others smuggle weapons and explosives into the prison.[124]Horowitz and Collier, 40. Fay denied this request, but others hesitated.

Jackson’s first attempt to escape was a spectacularly bloody failure. On 7 August 1970, Jackson’s seventeen-year-old brother Jonathan invaded the Marin County Courthouse armed with guns purchased by the notorious Communist Angela Davis, who had fallen in love with George and become involved in his defense. (The lovebirds had bonded over the prospect of killing White people; she gushed to him in a letter, “We have to learn to rejoice when pig’s blood is spilled.”[125]Liberatore, 82.) Jonathan intended to take hostages and force the liberation of the Soledad Brothers. He armed several convicts who were testifying in court and they seized the judge, prosecutor, and three jurors. The judge, Jonathan, and two of the convicts perished in a shoot-out before they could make their getaway. (Davis eventually faced trial for murder, but was acquitted, permitting her to forge a career as lifelong pain-in-the-ass to White America.)

Jonathan Jackson leading hostages out of the Marin County Courthouse. The judge has a shotgun taped around his neck.
Jonathan Jackson leading hostages out of the Marin County Courthouse. The judge has a shotgun taped around his neck.

In October 1970, Soledad Brother, Fay’s collection of George’s prison letters, was published. This led to a crisis. Jackson was unhappy that Fay toned down his image by deleting his more homicidal musings, and Jackson’s family and Black supporters were angry that White lawyers were claiming the royalties from the book for the Soledad Defense Committee. White supporters had already been the target of paranoid denunciations and even violence from Blacks around the case who didn’t understand the work they were doing or simply resented White solicitude.

The book portrayed prison officials as vicious racists and brought crushing press attention to bear on conditions in California prisons. It created a highly volatile situation in the prison system, endangering both guards and inmates.[126]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 228-29.

Jackson demanded that the money from his book, and other monies going to his Defense Committee, be diverted to his guerrilla army “training” in the Santa Cruz hills. Fay refused to cooperate, insisting they go to trial. It appears she shrank from a real plunge into violent revolution, although she considered Jackson a “comrade” in the “struggle.” Jackson somehow managed to divert defense money to his real comrades, and deceived his family about where the money went; the result was that his family and friends conceived a hatred for the “thieving” White lawyers. The disagreement between Fay and Jackson over the book royalties culminated in an “epic shouting match,”[127]Horowitz and Collier, 40. and Jackson fired her, whereupon she quit.

It was February 1971. She was emotionally exhausted and sought comfort at home, reading novels in her bathrobe and putting on weight. Her marriage was turning sour again as well. Her departure from the case drained much of the life out of the effort: “quiet hopelessness has taken possession of everyone,” lamented a friend.[128]Horowitz and Collier, 41. Tragically, however, Fay would never be free of George Jackson. His Black followers quickly jumped to the conclusion that she was a “turncoat,” and their hatred would pursue her for years. The police would later uncover a “hit list” with Fay’s name on it. The only thing Fay had gained from working for Blacks was a deep sense of fear.

Fay and Prison Reform: the Prison Law Project

California wasn’t getting off that easy, however. Fay quickly floated a new venture, the Prison Law Project, with nine young female lawyers and assistants, including her lover. They intended to work on prison reform in general and render legal help to individual prisoners. Fay brought suits against the California prison system, gained grants from the federal government, and sparked legislative investigations of the prisons. Prison officials (who were working with poor human and financial resources) began to feel even more besieged. Conditions in the main prisons were bad, and some reform was necessary, but coupling this reform to a revolutionary agenda was equivalent to lighting a powder keg.

As soon as word got around the prisons about the project (and the young White females running it), letters flooded in from inmates pleading for their help. Again, the women were intoxicated in the presence of purported outlaws and revolutionaries. One of them later said, “Every visit was like a first date, like a drug.”[129]Eve Pell, We Used to Own the Bronx: Memoirs of a Former Debutante. (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009), 175. The quote is from Erlinda Castro. Fay herself resumed her old ways; she was kicked out of one prison for making out with yet another Black convict, a man who later murdered two people.[130]Ibid., 182-83, 186.
(Eve Pell, We Used to Own the Bronx: Memoirs of a Former Debutante. (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009), 175. The quote is from Erlinda Castro.)

In late June 1971, Newton again went to trial for the murder of Officer Frey; it resulted in a hung jury thanks to a Hispanic female.[131]Pearlman, American Justice, 394. A third trial also ended with a hung jury, and District Attorney Lowell Jensen reluctantly but wisely decided to drop the case.

Two months later, on August 21, the saga of George Jackson came to an end in San Quentin Prison, where he had been transferred. Somehow, he got hold of a gun, probably slipped to him by one of his radical lawyers. After a meeting with his new lawyers, he was taken back to his cell block, stopped and searched:

A clip of bullets hidden in his Afro wig clattered to the floor. Suddenly he was brandishing a 9-millimeter automatic . . . “The Dragon has come,” he said to the guards

. . . he ordered the cell blocks opened . . . There was a moment of euphoria and then the realization that there was nowhere to go. In the next few minutes, Jackson and his group of supporters released friends and rounded up guards and enemies. The scene quickly careened out of control; within minutes, three [White] guards and two White convicts lay in Jackson’s cell choking on their own blood, their throats slit by razor blades embedded in toothbrushes [Jackson shot one of the guards in the head point-blank]. As authorities moved to isolate the uprising, Jackson realized that the game was up. True to his vision of himself, he yelled to his friends, “It’s me they want!” and charged into the prison yard, firing blindly at the guard towers above, where sharpshooters lay on their bellies, waiting for him to come into their sights. The first of the two shots . . . splintered his shinbone; the next one caught him in the tenth rib, ricocheted up his spine, and exited the roof of his skull.[132]Horowitz and Collier, 42-3.

The news hit Fay very hard; she clearly still loved him. A week later the Weather Underground carried out three bombings in Jackson’s honor; later that year Bob Dylan recorded “George Jackson,” calling the vicious murderer “a man I really loved.” In early September, the inmates of Attica Prison in New York rose in rebellion; although they had not planned the uprising, the death of Jackson had triggered strong emotions among the prisoners. The revolt ended with the deaths of twenty-nine inmates and nine guards after a very heavy-handed suppression of the revolt.[133]Larry Getlen. “The True Story of the Attica Prison Riot.” New York Post, August 20, 2016. Viewed October 1, 2019: https://nypost.com/2016/08/20/the-true-story-of-the-...-riot/ One can blame the cops for brutality, but obviously their fears had reached a pitch from years of agitation and the specter of prison revolt. Several factors combined to cause the unrest in American prisons in this era, but Fay Stender must take her share of the blame for her shamefully ignorant activism.[134]A commission called by California Governor Reagan to investigate the Jackson affair placed much blame on Stender and the “bad press Stender had generated about Soledad Prison . . . Prison officials insisted Stender had egged on the prisoners’ rights movement by spreading false and incendiary charges of inmate mistreatment and baseless and lawsuits.” Pearlman, American Justice, 404. She made herself liable for blood.

When Fay decided not to defend Jackson’s prison buddies who carried out the bloodbath on the day he died (the “San Quentin Six), her Prison Law Project broke apart bitterly. The young hard-liners could not brook abandoning these prison “comrades.” Fay’s lesbian lover became her most severe critic, accusing her of running the law “collective” as an autocrat. Half of the Project split away to form a new legal team, and some of them never spoke to Fay again.[135]Horowitz and Collier, 44-45.

Fay plunged ahead. In December 1972, she won a major “victory” against indeterminate sentences. Under these old guidelines, offenders would be sentenced to (say) “one to ten years,” and the system could then evaluate an offender and release him when he deserved it, or continue to hold him. When the California Supreme Court ruled against indeterminate sentences, it opened the door for—something Fay should have foreseen—mandatory longer sentences.[136]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 281. The result was more prisoners and longer sentences. As so often, Fay’s activism had made conditions worse because she could not see the value of compromise.

By early 1973, her funds had run out, and Fay shut down the Prison Law Project. She was actually relieved. By this time, Fay had finally come to see the real nature of the convicts she had tried to help. She told Marvin that of all the men she had freed, “only one, absolutely only one, stayed out.” More than one had committed rapes or murders after being freed. She told a friend that hardcore convicts “had a screw loose somewhere . . . there was always a reason they were incarcerated.”[137]The first quote is from Horowitz and Collier, 46; the second is from Lise Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 283. What a tangled complex of feelings must have accompanied the epiphany! To her credit, she admitted her mistake to friends.

Fay at Loose Ends: Feminism and Gay Rights

Fay was disenchanted and depressed. She had turned forty. She had lost her female lover, was losing her husband, and her most cherished political cause had blown up in her face. It was 1973, and the entire “Movement” had sputtered to a halt and was in the process of metamorphosing; the radicals had lost their faith in militant activism outside “the system” and began to enter that system in droves to work from within. The process was not smooth; many leftists spent years coming to terms with the collapse of the movement.

Since any facet of society could be turned into a “cause,” Fay would not be adrift for long. Soon she turned (along with many other radical Jews) to feminist and homosexual issues. She entered another relationship with a woman, called “Katherine” by Pearlman. One of the cases she became involved with helped push California law into accepting the “rights” of lesbians in custody cases.[138]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 313-14. Another gash in the fabric of Gentile society.

In 1978, Fay went on a tour of Europe with her old friend Hilde Stern. It was a soul-searching jaunt. She wanted to ponder her future direction, and whether to try to save her marriage. Once in Europe, her Jewish identity rose to dominate her consciousness. She visited the synagogues and places of Jewish interest wherever she went. In Athens, viewing the ancient structures on the Acropolis, she felt only “an overwhelming urge to reaffirm her own heritage” and peevishly wondered “why her professors had never credited ancient Jewish culture with any lasting influence on Western tradition.”[139]Ibid., 330.
(Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 313-14.)

In Geneva she visited friends and gifted them, as if it were a priceless artifact, a letter she had kept from George Jackson. She went to Stockholm for a UN conference on children. There she began to do push-ups in imitation of the imprisoned Jackson, who had done hundreds every day, and worked on manuscripts about Jackson and feminism.[140]Horowitz and Collier, 50-52. She thought about living permanently in Sweden, but it troubled her that Sweden had continued its relations with Germany during World War II. She proceeded to Warsaw for another conference; she had read up on the Warsaw uprising of 1943, and was angered to find so little commemoration of the event in the city. She was well aware of the Jewish history in Poland and was in high dudgeon against Polish “Anti-Semitism.” At the Warsaw Symphony she was “anguished by the absence of any musicians who looked even faintly Jewish.”[141]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 342-43. (Would she have any sympathy for Whites, who in the near future will look in vain for fellow White faces in their own nations? Would she see the contradiction if she did not?)

She also thought about her sexual identity. She decided to break up with Marvin for good and reunite with her lesbian lover. In early 1979, she returned to Berkeley. She and Marvin ended their marriage amicably, and Fay kept the house and the children, who lived at home in their young adulthood. Fay resumed her relationship with “Katherine.”

The End

May 28, 1979. The doorbell rang, well after midnight. Fay’s son Neal, used to unexpected visitors, opened the door. A Black man stuck a gun in his face and demanded Fay Stender. Neal led him upstairs and roused his mother from bed. The man demanded an answer to a chilling question: “Don’t you feel you betrayed George Jackson?” Fay calmly denied it. He ordered her to write a dictated note and sign it: “I, Fay Stender, admit I betrayed George Jackson and the prison movement when they needed me most.” She protested but finished writing. He pocketed the note then demanded money; Fay escorted him downstairs and gave him some from her kitchen drawer. He walked past her to the door as if to leave, then wheeled, crouched, and shot her five times with hollow-point .38 caliber bullets.[142]The shooting is described by Pearlman in Call Me Phaedra, 355-58, and by Horowitz and Collier, 52-55.

Fay suffered terrible damage to her liver, chest and arms; she was paralyzed from the waist down. She would face months or years of rehabilitation and would never again lead a normal life. She didn’t leave the hospital until late July, going straight into a rehabilitation center.

The shooting shocked the radical community in the Bay Area. The police shared with reporters a purported “hit list” with the names of Fay and others on it. Fay’s family and friends were terrified; some of them asked for police protection. Marvin obtained a gun permit and sent their children into hiding. A few radicals began to suspect the truth about convicts.

Despite her depression and pain, she resolved to put her assailant away. To find justice, she would need the help of—exquisite irony—Lowell Jensen, still District Attorney. Jensen, incredibly, bore her no ill will, and assigned her case to a good prosecutor.

The police quickly apprehended a suspect, Edward Brooks. He was an ex-con and a member of a prison gang co-founded by George Jackson, the Black Guerrilla Family. He had shot Fay from a sense of loyalty to Jackson and other prisoners whom Fay had supposedly betrayed.[143]Horowitz and Collier, 56.

The shooting of Fay highlighted the hypocrisy in the radical community. Almost all of them now supported the police and district attorney and wanted the shooter prosecuted, even though they had “spent their professional lives denouncing the criminal justice system as an instrument of racial and class oppression and defending accused criminals as social victims.”[144]Ibid., 56.
(Horowitz and Collier, 56.)
The hypocrisy reached a greater poignancy when a former colleague of Fay’s, a member of the Prison Law Project, appeared on the shooter’s defense team, stating later, “I was just seething at the way the White Left reacted to Brooks’ arrest. It was racist. They had never taken this attitude . . . in the past. . . . And yet, when one of their own was shot, they immediately cooperated with the cops.”[145]Ibid., 57-8.
(Horowitz and Collier, 56.)

Fay was plunged into despair, alternating between self-pity and bitter anger over how the Blacks had repaid her ministrations. She could barely play the piano and could not sit up for long; she found relief only by lying on her back. She sent her Sapphic lover away, unable to have (what amounted to) abnormal relations. She really wanted Marvin back for his steady strength, but he had a new woman and declined her hints. She resolved to commit suicide, but wanted to see Brooks put away first. She would have to summon the strength to testify against him, in the same courtroom she had defended Huey Newton so long before.

On January 18, 1979, Fay took the stand. Charles Garry was in attendance, but not a single Black recipient of her aid showed up to support her. The jury quickly found Brooks guilty, and a few weeks later he was sentenced to seventeen years.[146]Ibid., 62-3.
(Horowitz and Collier, 56.)

Fay then burned all her papers, moved to Hong Kong, and after a good deal of hesitation and anguish, killed herself on May 19, 1980. She was forty-eight. Her body was brought back for a Jewish funeral, attended by 300. David Horowitz, former editor of Ramparts, was present; he was struck by how few Blacks attended. (He would write a long article on Fay, based on his conversations with Eve Pell, who had worked with Fay on the Prison Law Project.) Another radical in attendance observed, “no matter what you do, if you are White, it doesn’t matter if you spent your whole life working for Blacks.”[147]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 430.

Huey Newton did not attend the funeral; the next month he would earn a sham Ph.D. from UC-Santa Cruz (submitting—perhaps even writing— a paper entitled “War Against the Panthers: a Study in Repression in America”[148]Pearson, 287.). He would be shot dead on an Oakland street in August 1989, also by a member of the Black Guerrilla Family. He was forty-seven, the same age as Fay when she was shot.[149]Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 440.

The saga of Fay Stender thus sputtered to an end.

Conclusion

Fay’s life perfectly illustrates the nature of radical Jewish activism and the immense harm that it can inflict upon society. Her work amounted to nothing more than “disruption of White society.” Her Jewish perspective could not register the rationales that underlay the compromises between perfect justice and practicality that form the myriad bonds of a Gentile culture. White society is not perfect; it is not perfect because man’s nature and the world are not perfect. However, it is on balance just, and, above all, workable. To strain mightily to “perfect” the solid patterns of a settled society is to create tensions that inevitably build to an explosion. The explosion in Fay’s case saw guards massacred in San Quentin and five bullets pierce her own body.

Fay Stender indicted the entire justice system as “racist” without bothering to regard the nature of Black social pathology, or the damage that her activism could cause to a society that had settled itself around a workable solution to pervasive Black crime, or the personal danger that she risked for herself and her family.

One last note on personality. I believe that Fay possessed a measure of charity; that is, a will to do good. No one is purely evil, of course, and somewhere in the thicket of ego, ambition, leftist ideology, and blind selfishness that was Fay Stender, there was at least a small core of good intentions. Unfortunately, her good will labored under defects greater than these failings. First, unhampered female emotion crimped her ability to see a reasonable approach to problems. (A Gentile spouse of that era would certainly have forced her to accept far tighter boundaries on her activity.) There was the contempt she felt—possibly amounting to hatred—for Whites and their society. Most importantly, the nature of her Jewish radicalism, as applied to a Gentile society, could be nothing but deleterious. If a mathematical formula could be found to represent the harm that an activist Jew can do to a White society, it would have to incorporate a special symbol representing “one Fay Stender.”

Notes

[1] The main sources on the life of Fay Stender are David Horowitz and Peter Collier, “Requiem for a Radical” in Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About the Sixties (New York, 1990), and Lise Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra: The Life and Times of Movement Lawyer Fay Stender (Berkeley, CA: Regent Press, 2018), and American Justice on Trial: People v. Newton (Berkeley: Regent Press, 2016). The quote is from Horowitz and Collier, “Requiem for a Radical,” 24.

[2] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 279; Horowitz and Collier, 28.

[3] Horowitz and Collier, 22.

[4] Pearlman covers Stender’s ancestry in Call Me Phaedra, 9-11.

[5] Horowitz and Collier, 25.

[6] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 11-12.

[7] Ibid., 32.

[8] Ibid., 91-2.

[9] Ibid., 37, 40.

[10] Perry, Douglas. “Why Reedie and radical lawyer Fay Stender fought for prison reform — and paid with her life,” The Oregonian, June 27, 2015. Viewed September 14, 2017: http://www.oregonlive.com/living/index.ssf/2015/06/why_reedie_and_radical_lawyer.html

[11] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 37.

[12] Ibid., 44. Betty went on to become a radical member of the Berkeley City Council.

[13] Ibid., 47, 49. Bernardine Dohrn of the Weathermen would later obtain a J.D. from this school.

[14] Horowitz and Collier, 26.

[15] Ibid., 26.

[16] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 69.

[17] Ibid., 68. Zeisel’s work “later played a key role in assuring a diverse and sympathetic jury for the Huey Newton murder trial.”

[18] Ibid., 68.

[19] Ibid., 59.

[20] Ibid., 74-7.

[21] Ibid., 80.

[22] Ibid., 81-2.

[23] Ibid., 82-8. In 1971, Hilary Rodham would clerk for the former Communist Treuhaft.

[24] Ibid., 96.

[25] Ibid., 90.

[26] Ibid., 90-91.

[27] Rabbi Yosef Ovadia, former Chief Rabbi of Israel and head of the Council of Torah Sages: “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world . . .” See also Kevin MacDonald’s comments here.

[28] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 95.

[29] Kenneth Heineman, Put Your Bodies Upon the Wheels: Student Revolt in the 1960s (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2001), 36.

[30] Connor was the Chief of Police in Birmingham, Alabama, who used dogs and firehoses to break up civil rights demonstrations in May 1963. The resulting publicity produced widespread disgust and led to the first Civil Rights Act in July 1964.

[31] Bruce Watson, Freedom Summer: The Savage Season of 1964 That Made Mississippi Burn and Made America a Democracy (New York: Penguin Books, 2010), 63.

[32] Jonathan Kaufman, Broken Alliance: The Turbulent Times Between Blacks and Jews in America (New York: Touchstone, 1995), 98.

[33] Heineman, Put Your Bodies Upon the Wheels, 37, 39.

[34] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 97. Bruce Watson refers to Freedom Summer volunteers as “invaders” more than a dozen times.

[35] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 97.

[36] Mary Aickin Rothschild, A Case of Black and White: Northern Volunteers and the Southern Freedom Summers, 1964-1965 (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1982), 138-39.

[37] Rothschild, A Case of Black and White, 138.

[38] Ibid, 139.

[39] Bruce Watson, Freedom Summer, 267.

[40] Debra Schultz, Going South: Jewish Women in the Civil Rights Movement (New York: New York University Press, 2001), 115.

[41] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 98.

[42] When protestor Joe Blum reached Santa Rita prison after dawn, he heard a voice call out, “Hey Joe! How many of you motherfuckers are coming out here?” It was his friend from Merritt College, Huey Newton, in prison for assault. From Hugh Pearson, The Shadow of the Panther (Addison Wesley, 1994), 73.

[43] Arthur Liebman, Jews and the Left (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979), 68.

[44] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 98.

[45] Ibid., 100.

[46] Ibid., 100-01.

[47] See Kevin MacDonald, “Jews, Blacks, and Race” here, and E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History, Chapter 16.

[48] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 101-02.

[49] Ibid., 102. Franck is Jewish; so was Axelrod.

[50] Heineman, 42.

[51] David Horowitz, Radical Son: A Generational Odyssey (New York: The Free Press, 1997), 227.

[52] Eric Cummins, The Rise and Fall of California’s Radical Prison Movement (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994), 97.

[53] All quotes from Cummins, 97.

[54] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 113.

[55] Hugh Pearson, The Shadow of the Panther, 104.

[56] “Cleaver . . . would do more than anyone else to facilitate Huey Newton’s Black Panther Party replacing SNCC as the national symbol of Black disenchantment.” Pearson, 104.

[57] Peter Richardson, A Bomb in Every Issue: How the Short, Unruly Life of Ramparts Magazine Changed America (New York: The New Press, 2009), 69-70.

[58] Cummins, California’s Radical Prison Movement, 100.

[59] Richardson, A Bomb in Every Issue, 121.

[60] Ibid., 122-23. Cleaver’s warden from San Quentin had a different view of his writing. He thought it was “racist as hell, talking about the White honkies and death to the White man and that sort of thing . . . I consider[ed] it garbage, the words of a diseased mind.” (from Cummins, 98.)

[61] Cummins, 103.

[62] Cummins, 103.

[63] Lise Pearlman, American Justice, 110-11.

[64] Horowitz and Collier, 29.

[65] Pearlman, American Justice, 133.

[66] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 118.

[67] Pearlman, American Justice, 110.

[68] Pearson, 292.

[69] Richardson, 92-3. Stern probably knew the “French Resistance” was largely Jewish; see “Was the French Resistance Jewish?” in the Tablet: https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/201308/was-the-french-resistance-jewish

[70] See here for Scherr.

[71] Cummins, 113-14.

[72] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 119.

[73] Pearlman, American Justice, 112, 136.

[74] Ibid., 38.

[75] Ibid., 117-18.

[76] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 121.

[77] Ibid., 122.

[78] Pearlman, American Justice, 151.

[79] Ibid., 151.

[80] In his book And the Walls Came Tumbling Down, Ralph Abernathy, close associate of Martin Luther King, testifies that King spent time with two women that night, neither one his wife, and beat up a third. See http://articles.latimes.com/1989-11-12/books/bk-1880_1_ralph-david-abernathy/2

[81] After the Watts riots in August 1965, in which the Blacks of Los Angeles had destroyed much of their community, they nevertheless felt that they had “had chastised the White power structure.” Heineman, 41.

[82] Pearson, 154.

[83] Pearson, 155.

[84] Cummins, 121.

[85] Pearlman, American Justice, 161-62.

[86] Ibid., 177.

[87] Ibid., 217.

[88] Ibid., 223.

[89] Ibid., 215.

[90] Pearson, 167.

[91] Pearlman, American Justice, 210-13.

[92] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 126.

[93] Pearlman, American Justice, 284-85.

[94] Ibid., 286.

[95] Ibid., 327.

[96] Ibid., 287-88.

[97] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 130-31.

[98] Pearlman, American Justice, 298-302.

[99] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, xiv.

[100] Pearlman, American Justice, 357-58.

[101] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 143-44.

[102] Horowitz and Collier, 31.

[103] Pearlman, American Justice, 358.

[104] Both quotes from Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 150.

[105] Ibid., 336.

[106] Paul Liberatore, The Road to Hell: The True Story of George Jackson, Stephen Bingham, and the San Quentin Massacre. (New York: The Atlantic Monthly Press, 1996), 15-16.

[107] Liberatore, 16-17.

[108] Horowitz and Collier, 32.

[109] Max Nelson, “Extreme Remedies” in The Paris Review, December 7, 2015. Accessed November 19, 2017: https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2015/12/07/extreme-remedies/

[110] Horowitz and Collier, 32.

[111] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 168.

[112] Ibid., 173.

[113] Horowitz and Collier, 36.

[114] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 205.

[115] Ibid., 157-58. The decision did not accept Fay’s argument about jury composition, but rather faulted the jury instructions of the judge.

[116] Ibid., 214-15.

[117] Ibid., 223-24.

[118] Horowitz and Collier, 37; Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 186-87.

[119] Douglas Perry, “Why Reedie and radical lawyer Fay Stender fought for prison reform – and paid with her life,” The Oregonian, June 27, 2015. Accessed September 14, 2017: http://www.oregonlive.com/living/index.ssf/2015/06/why_reedie_and_radical_lawyer.html

[120] Horowitz and Collier, 36.

[121] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 204

[122] Ibid., 204.

[123] Ibid., 242.

[124] Horowitz and Collier, 40.

[125] Liberatore, 82.

[126] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 228-29.

[127] Horowitz and Collier, 40.

[128] Horowitz and Collier, 41.

[129] Eve Pell, We Used to Own the Bronx: Memoirs of a Former Debutante. (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009), 175. The quote is from Erlinda Castro.

[130] Ibid., 182-83, 186.

[131] Pearlman, American Justice, 394.

[132] Horowitz and Collier, 42-3.

[133] Larry Getlen. “The True Story of the Attica Prison Riot.” New York Post, August 20, 2016. Viewed October 1, 2019: https://nypost.com/2016/08/20/the-true-story-of-the-attica-prison-riot/

[134] A commission called by California Governor Reagan to investigate the Jackson affair placed much blame on Stender and the “bad press Stender had generated about Soledad Prison . . . Prison officials insisted Stender had egged on the prisoners’ rights movement by spreading false and incendiary charges of inmate mistreatment and baseless and lawsuits.” Pearlman, American Justice, 404.

[135] Horowitz and Collier, 44-45.

[136] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 281.

[137] The first quote is from Horowitz and Collier, 46; the second is from Lise Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 283.

[138] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 313-14.

[139] Ibid., 330.

[140] Horowitz and Collier, 50-52.

[141] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 342-43.

[142] The shooting is described by Pearlman in Call Me Phaedra, 355-58, and by Horowitz and Collier, 52-55.

[143] Horowitz and Collier, 56.

[144] Ibid., 56.

[145] Ibid., 57-8.

[146] Ibid., 62-3.

[147] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 430.

[148] Pearson, 287.

[149] Pearlman, Call Me Phaedra, 440.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Of Related Interest
Is it a Hate Crime to Call Roberta Kaplan a "chubby lesbian kike"?
Hide 245 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. unit472 says:

    Good article about horrible people and a trip down memory lane for me. I had attended Berkeley High School for a semester until I prevailed upon my parents to get me out of that ‘Black Panther’ wannabe nightmare. The most vicious blacks had pretty white girlfriends and to meet the quota of black teachers hoodrats from Laney Junior College were hired to teach Afro American studies courses. Being a helluva lot more conversant with ‘Afro American’ history and politics than these teachers I even enrolled in on the so called courses. The hoodrat teacher complemented me on my familiarity with the The Honorable Elijah Muhammed and chastised the dull uncomprehending faces of his black students for not reading more about the ‘revolution’ that was supposedly taking place but they preferred to just wear those ridiculous black leather “Panther” coats and beachball sized Afros as their vocabularies were far too limited to rant about ‘greedy avaricious pigs’ like their idol Huey.

    That Fay Stender reaped what she sowed but she wasn’t alone. I’ve seen studies that show white women in relationships with black men are more than 12 times as likely to be murdered by their partner than if their partner was white. If they bore a child with a negro they became damaged goods and likely to be impoverished for the rest of their lives as negro men just do not make good providers.

  2. @unit472

    Thanks for bringing this article to my attention. Really opened my eyes.
    Another case of Barney Fife being correct, nip it in the bud.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  3. Alden says:

    We, (Bay Area Law Enforcement) had a big party to celebrate her killing at the hands of one of her beloved pets. I knew her husband Marvin. How any woman could reject that handsome White man for the likes of Jackson, Newton etc. Marvin was no Woody Allan. He looked like the typical handsome Irishman, prematurely gray hair, handsome face, big boned but not chubby.

    And now Chesa Boudin, son of weather underground black panthers Kathy Boudin is running for San Francisco DA on a platform of close down the jail and criminal courts. As of Thursday Nov 7 results are still not clear but his opponent, Susan Loftus, District Attorney, career prosecutor appointed by the Mayor is winning.

    Stender is really not a San Franciscan. She’s a Berkeleyite along with Jessica Mitford, Allan Ginsburg, Robert Scheer, Tom Hayden, Bob Truehaft, Bettina Apthotker and the rest of the communists revolutionaries who settled in that horrible town.

    Results are the ruination of a nice little college town by the Jewish liberals beloved Oakland blacks

    • Replies: @Guyan
  4. Alden says:
    @unit472

    By the way, Huey and the other Panthers of Oakland were nothing but a criminal gang of pimps, robbers, extortionists and thieves. Jewish communists and liberals are either very dumb or very smart in falling for that black revolutionary garbage.

  5. El Dato says:

    That’s a sad story of intelligence not being used for intelligent goals, but instead for self-indulgence and rank narcissism, with the externalities being offloaded to society.

    But whence the relentlessly burning Jungle Fever going into self-abasement, holy damn.

    At a party the night of his release, reveling Panthers declared that Newton needed a woman; they corralled Fay and escorted the two to a bedroom. Fay was ecstatic and later bragged about it to female colleagues, some of whom were appalled.

    This is not the Story of O, take a shower!!

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    , @fish
  6. AceDeuce says:

    I knew a groid woman originally from Oakland, who grew up with Newton. She said he was “pretty” as a young kid, and kind of shy, and preferred playing with the girls rather than the boys, earning him the title of “sissy” from the young male ghetto rats.

    Probably his later life was a way of making up for that–and indulgent, naive, guilt-ridden YTs were ideal enablers.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @Alden
  7. Alden says:

    The Black Panthers originated at Oakland community college black students group. Sergeant Shriver, father of Maria Schriver Schwarzenegger brother in law of President Kennedy was the White liberal who discovered and funded the Panthers Shriver was head of LBJ’s War on Poverty Program. All their money came from the War on Poverty.

    Nothing, absolutely nothing has changed in Bay Area politics in the last 70 years.

  8. Alden says:
    @AceDeuce

    Newton was very handsome and light colored. So were Katherine Cleaver. Angela Davis, Malcolm X and many others. I’m sure the communists selected them partly for their looks.

    Never forget Angela Davis was raised by hard left White Quakers. There were Quakers in The American Friends Service Committee who worked with the Stender/Garry Prison Law Project, Black Panthers and other deeply subversive groups.

    Someone once did the math. There were more Johnson Nixon Carter federally funded commie hard left do gooders invading the San Francisco Criminal Courts than there were convicted felons in the entire County whether in county jail, state prison or out of prison.

    The county jail was full of civilian sheriff employees called social workers who were felons convicted of serious crimes including murder. One committed several rapes while employed as a sheriff’s civilian employee. Sheriff the Head Sheriff of the county Mike Hennessy really went to bat personally for that black rapist. He raised the man’s bail Rapist was convicted and sent maximum term to San Quentin

    Things are just as bad nowadays. The gays and trannies are harmless compared to the underlying hard left destructive subversive liberalism of the San Francisco high high up establishment. Bohemian Club, types, not Olympic Club types.

    • Replies: @Neil Templeton
  9. Alden says:
    @AceDeuce

    Newton and the Black Panthers were primarily pimps of pathetic retarded skank black street prostitutes and extortionists who terrorized big and small businesses all over Oakland. They were just standard Oakland thugs with 90 instead of 70 IQs. They could read!!!!!!!

    And the liberals just adored them. Another nasty group liberals, especially liberal Jewish hippy revolutionary girls just adored were Hell’s Angels

  10. Excellent article, thanks. Sad story but not uncommon. Growing up on Chicago’s North Side I skated around the edge of many of the radical leftist groups (Wobblies, Young Lords, and Young Patriots) who were active in the community. Radical black group members were treated like celebrities by the white North Siders who were playing at being revolutionaries. Many of these black radicals seemed mostly preoccupied with getting high and getting laid.

    I had a Jewish friend at the time whose mother serially entered into relationships with Black men involved in civil rights activities. She had divorced this kid’s father to devote more of her time to the “struggle for civil rights.”

    Her son was bothered to no end by his mother’s choices in romantic partners. The saddest thing about it was he was very troubled by his “racist” reaction to his mother’s lovers. Eventually we started running in different circles and I heard a few years later that he had attempted suicide and ended up in an institution. I had not thought about my friend in quite some time until this article brought him to mind.

  11. anon[920] • Disclaimer says:

    It is not as if something like this had not happened before, either. Stender’s ego was huge.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Betty_Van_Patter

    Lefties always assume they won’t become targets.

  12. Miro23 says:

    The trial began with jury selection on July 15, 1968. Judge Monroe Friedman presided. The prosecutor was the tall, courtly, almost ridiculously decent Lowell Jensen. Even Pearlman points out the contrast in style and behavior between the prosecution and the defense; it was exactly what one might expect between a WASP and a group consisting mostly of Jews.

    It’s clearly not going to be tall, courtly, decent people who fix this problem.

    Most importantly, the nature of her Jewish radicalism, as applied to a Gentile society, could be nothing but deleterious. If a mathematical formula could be found to represent the harm that an activist Jew can do to a White society, it would have to incorporate a special symbol representing “one Fay Stender.”

    A virus like this has to be quarantined (in Israel).

  13. Alden says:

    “ A gentile spouse of that era would certainly have forced her to accept tighter boundaries on her activity”’

    Umm ummm I knew Marvin pretty well. He was even more of a greatest generation hard left communist than Faye was. He’s jewish the way he’s German and I’m English, just hereditary. His parents were anti Jewish religion atheist communists and so was he. They married for the same reason Lenin and Krupska did or Karl and Jennie Marx or Priscilla and Alger Huss and Bernadette Dohrn and Bill Ayers. To have a partner for the revolution.

    Marvin was as much an America hating kneegrow loving liberal as Faye was if not worse. He just loved her association with Huey. It proved their bonafides as true blue commie and revolutionaries. They urged their daughter to have a black criminal for sex. He wanted that. Most of those commie women born 1930-1950 with black men were urged and brought up to it by their commie parents both parents because divorce was rare in the old days. Plus commie parents were devoted to the cause and didn’t divorce because they needed partners to help the revolution.

    Marvin was proud Faye was involved sexually with Huey and other black criminal trash.

    Then when gays became the fashionable liberal cause Faye became a lesbian of course. Were she still alive she’d be campaigning for climate change or anti vaccines or compulsory hijabs and burkas in public schools to make Muslims feel inclusive safe not offended and comfortable.

    And now a 4th generation Jewish communist grandson of attorney for CPUSA Leonard Boudin son of Weather Underground Black Panther terrorists Kathy Boudin and Dave Gilbert is the elected DA of San Francisco. He ran on a campaign of closing the jail, not charging any black criminals, convicting police of non existent police brutality and other goals of the Soros DAs. Pw

  14. Franz says:

    Someone once did the math. There were more Johnson Nixon Carter federally funded commie hard left do gooders invading the San Francisco Criminal Courts than there were convicted felons in the entire County whether in county jail, state prison or out of prison.

    I believe it.

    The (now deceased) Chicago muckraking columnist Sherman Skolnick did an investigation of every one of the “Chicago Seven” radicals charged for planning the riot at the Democratic Convention there in 1968. Every stinking one of them was funded via various front organizations that Sherman traced back to the Rockefeller Foundation.

    If it ain’t the government, it’s the other felons known as NGOs.

    That whole era was nothing but one big Color Revolution. No Soros, but the game plan was the same.

    • Agree: Alden
  15. Anon[708] • Disclaimer says:

    That sort of ideological foolishness was possible in her generation because it was an amazingly sheltered generation. Nowadays, with social media, you really have to make an effect to hide black criminality and black stupidity from yourself.

    • Replies: @Wally
  16. “Burn the coal,….”

  17. Eze Victor says: • Website

    So much quality in one website..Kudos

  18. @unit472

    You are right she reaped what she sowed and this happens all of the time but is not reported by the media. The Jews have a weakness they believe that by helping and supposedly controlling blacks, Muslims and other minorities they will destroy all the white race. What they haven’t figured out if the white race is destroyed they will be done too as the blacks and Muslims will kill them too.

    The Jewish owners of the NFL, and NBA are called “Slave and Plantation Masters by the Black Players and will attack them at a moments notice but the Jewish owners haven’t figured that out yet. This is an excellent article and represents a real world of example of what these crazy Jews will do. Furthermore, it shows the lengths they will go to, to appease and promote these thugs. Behind every Black in public there is usually a Jew or group of them controlling the dialogue and their actions. From King to Obama it’s all the same to these destroyers of society.

  19. Guyan says:

    I lived in Berkeley from the spring of 1971 until November of 1975. Fay Stender was a virulent anti-White.

    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
  20. ((((((Fay Stender))))))

    Because sometimes triple parentheses isn’t enough.

    • LOL: Kolya Krassotkin
  21. @El Dato

    Some females have black fetish. They crave not human masculinity, but bestiality. Let them have it & disappear from our/white history & identity.

    https://www.counter-currents.com/2014/09/the-question-of-female-masochism/

    [MORE]

    • Agree: Richard B
    • Replies: @teachem2think
  22. A superb article. Kudos!

    The destructiveness of these people generally ends only when they die. Their intellectual and moral heirs rarely learn from this, however.

    Any healthy people wants for its own kind to survive. Despite the lower intelligence and lack of long term planing or ability to defer gratification of negroes and aboriginals, they are loyal to their own. Whites don’t get it, and apart from a small remnant it does not appear as though they will.

    White society understood blacks and kept their pathologies under control in America until the “civil rights era”, a dysphemism, because its first premise was a systematic violation of the first and most basic civil right, that of free association between individuals both as individuals and corporately. Since then untold misery has been brought on both whites and blacks.

    Blacks were better off before “civil rights” because although many chafed at society’s restrictions on them, the murder rate in “the community” (sic) was a fraction of what it is today and those blacks who behaved themselves and had a little on the ball did okay. The “talented tenth”, stuck among their own people, provided valuable guidance and set a better example to average blacks, and blacks were improving slowly but steadily as the better ones prospered and the failures tended to be weeded out, being less likely to have children. Now the stupidest and most vicious black bucks are siring the most children with the laziest and stupidest black women and the best blacks are mimicking white liberals in childlessness.

    • Agree: Sick of Orcs
    • Replies: @Right Reaction
  23. Nodwink says:

    The Black Panthers were awesome, probably my favourite American political group.

  24. Well because it’s open for discussion, which is usually the point of these articles, which aren’t news’

    “Did Fay think of the implications of their strategy? Or did she simply accept the idea that Newton was justified in his actions because of White racism?

    This would be a double edged sword at play here. On the one hand it was a famous case for her, on the other if she didn’t provide the best defense possible for her client then A) she loses her law license B) she’s a racist and didn’t provide a proper defense because he is a black man.
    So the legal team sought him out to provide the best defense possible to a black man because he was a black man making them revolutionaries, money grubbers, and radicals standing telling truth to power, standing with the working man against a corrupt white system, whcih is far better then just being a white racist.

    Thanks for triggering open discussion. A+

  25. @Alden

    Not questioning your comment on that family, but here:

    Karl and Jennie Marx

    you got it all wrong. This was a true love story having nothing to do with any revolution (or “revolution”).

    • Replies: @Alden
  26. “Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out” – D. Horowitz

    If you took the most ardent revolutionary, vested him in absolute power, within a year he would be worse than the Tsar himself. – Mikhail Bakunin

    No social or political order is ever completely fair (it cannot be, because life is not fair), but is like a thin sheet of ice over chaos.

    Those who hack at this thin ice should be careful what they wish, and work, for. They always seem to think they will be in charge after the ice is broken, but that’s not the Nature of things.

  27. On the physiognomy of this Stender creature (I’m not talking hook noses):

    She evokes Stanley Ann Dunham .

    • Replies: @Alden
  28. The most interesting part of this article is the last several paragraphs. The pattern of the Jew faux-leftist emerging later in life as a full-blown Judeonationalist/Judesupremacist is well established.

    Jew leftism is only a psychological sublimation of Jew hatred for Western Christian culture. So after a career of undermining our society, the faux-leftist Jew begins to sense that the outcome may not, after all, be good for the Jews (his only real framework–conscious or sub-conscious–for analyzing anything) and begins–surreptitiously–to move to the right. It’s a further extension of Norman Podhoretz’s proto-neocon 1963 “My Negro Problem and Ours.” (No points for guessing who the “ours” refers too.)

    In this piece, we sees this unbearably odious Jewess following the pattern to a tee. She transfers her faux-leftism to a much more authentic Judeonationalism, whining, just before her death, about Poland’s lack of interest in focusing on Jews:

    “she had read up on the Warsaw uprising of 1943, and was angered to find so little commemoration of the event in the city. She was well aware of the Jewish history in Poland and was in high dudgeon against Polish ‘Anti-Semitism.’ At the Warsaw Symphony she was ‘anguished by the absence of any musicians who looked even faintly Jewish.’”

    It’s appropriate that the article cites Bob Dylan who followed a similar, though less self-destructive, and therefore more typically Jewish, trajectory of early faux-universalism and then, as he aged, became an increasingly overt Jew. Jerry Seinfeld’s trip to Israel and family fun with the IDF is the same sort of “getting in touch with my roots” hypocrisy that is legion among our hypocrites in the synagogue. It’s the kind of thing he might have mocked in Seinfeld had it been a goy’s particularism rather than his getting in touch with his own ideological Jewishness. David Goldman (AKA “Spengler”) a sort of Trotskyite in his youth, is now a rampant Judeonationalist obsessed with promoting Jews and Jewishness in the most repulsively hypocritical ways, to include trying to convince the Chinese that Jews should be their new best friend.

    This phenomenon is to be found all over the popular culture that Jews disseminate to the goyim. Take, for example, the comics character of The Black Panther, developed and written by Jews in the 1960s. By the mid-1970s, the Jew, now scared by the kind of black behavior illustrated in this article, added the Killmonger character to personify the Jew’s idea of a bad, scary black radical as distinct from the good, scary (to white goyim) black radical who would act in a golem role on behalf of the Jew towards the white, Christian social institutions that the Jew hates with an undying passion (except when they are harnessed to the Jew’s goals.)

    The author notes that, “a former colleague of Fay’s, a member of the Prison Law Project, appeared on the shooter’s defense team, stating later, “I was just seething at the way the White Left reacted to Brooks’ arrest. It was racist. They had never taken this attitude . . . in the past. . . . And yet, when one of their own was shot, they immediately cooperated with the cops.”

    Just substitute “Jew” for “white”–which is how it should read–and the tribalist, faux-universalist hypocrisy is fully evident.

    This article is an excellent piece, providing a very illustrative case study of Jew faux-univeralism and the pattern by which it evolves over the life-span of the Jew, along neoconservative and Likudist pathways, into a latent and then increasingly overt and aggressive Judeotribalism that, of course, leaves in place all the damage the Jew faux-leftist has done to non-Jew culture and social arrangements, and impels him on a whole new career of social damage by trying to further Jewify the culture with heavy doses of culture-sickening, overt Judaization instead of the faux-universalist, crypto-Jewish prescriptions that he advocated in his younger days.

  29. Richard B says:
    @Female in FL

    A Jew thus lit yet another spark for Black(s against Whites).

    nip it in the bud

    If only we did.

    Here they are, at it again, some 50 years later.

    Krassner (Jewish) Philadelphia DA, aligns with Michael White (Black), who murdered Sean Schellenger (White).

    http://www.unz.com/sbpdl/his-name-is-sean-schellenger/

    With cases like this one and the overturning of the guilty verdict of the 1989 Central Park rape, anti-White violence is being normalized, legalized, justified, validated and magnified and multiplied.

    • Replies: @anonspeech
  30. Anon[388] • Disclaimer says:

    I think the social engineers have now co-opted the courts and law enforcement to be their new proxy warriors. It is much more effective for social change. They have stacked the courts with leftist judges and prosecutors. They have seen to it that organizations like DOJ and the FBI are run (and largely staffed) by loyal proxy warriors. Sadly Republicans are oblivious to this and still harbor the illusion that law enforcement is on their side, even after the FBI-backed Russia hoax coup attempt and local police allowing Antifa to crack the skulls of Trump rally goers with totally immunity from prosecution. And in one case of conservatives fighting back with their fists against Antifa in NYC the conservatives defending themselves received multiple-year prison sentences.

    Without fail judges and prosecutors and law enforcement have all shown complete fealty to their globalist oligarch masters. The federal/state/local government-backed astronomical increase in pay and benefits and pensions to law enforcement in the past few decades has been startling. State police used to live and sleep in barracks and get crappy pay. Now they can live in upper-middle class neighborhoods and make $250k/year and get a six-figure tax-free pension at 50. And the social engineers, who like the devil plays both ends to the middle, have provided the propaganda that this eyebrow-raising trend in law enforcement pay and power is due to cops having a dangerous job or, to placate those of choleric temperament, it’s the all-powerful public unions strong-arming politicians.

    Back to the article. Fay Stender was an evil woman who committed much evil and was an accessory in the commission of so much evil. Too bad she apparently never found Christ and confessed her sins and received absolution. Let’s hope in the end she did in some small way.

  31. Hrw-500 says:

    The attempt murder of Fay Stender reminds me of this politically incorrect cartoon done by a guy nicknamed A. Wyatt Mann then I saw at https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/web-sermon-5.html or check it on Imgur if you don’t want to read the whole article. https://imgur.com/a/tNoyRM2

  32. I’m glad this story had a happy ending.

  33. Anon[308] • Disclaimer says:

    Jackson’s first attempt to escape was a spectacularly bloody failure. On 7 August 1970, Jackson’s seventeen-year-old brother Jonathan invaded the Marin County Courthouse armed with guns purchased by the notorious Communist Angela Davis, who had fallen in love with George and become involved in his defense. (The lovebirds had bonded over the prospect of killing White people; she gushed to him in a letter, “We have to learn to rejoice when pig’s blood is spilled.”[125]) Jonathan intended to take hostages and force the liberation of the Soledad Brothers. He armed several convicts who were testifying in court and they seized the judge, prosecutor, and three jurors. The judge, Jonathan, and two of the convicts perished in a shoot-out before they could make their getaway. (Davis eventually faced trial for murder, but was acquitted, permitting her to forge a career as lifelong pain-in-the-ass to White America.)

    One thing that could’ve been inserted here is that Angela Davis was recruited and given a full scholarship to attend… [drum roll please]… Brandeis University. It was at Brandeis where Davis was inculcated with radical leftists politics from the likes of philosopher Herbert Marcuse (a Jew who also once worked for OSS/CIA) among others.

  34. @Anon

    Without fail judges and prosecutors and law enforcement have all shown complete fealty to their globalist oligarch masters. The federal/state/local government-backed astronomical increase in pay and benefits and pensions to law enforcement in the past few decades has been startling. State police used to live and sleep in barracks and get crappy pay. Now they can live in upper-middle class neighborhoods and make $250k/year and get a six-figure tax-free pension at 50. And the social engineers, who like the devil plays both ends to the middle, have provided the propaganda that this eyebrow-raising trend in law enforcement pay and power is due to cops having a dangerous job or, to placate those of choleric temperament, it’s the all-powerful public unions strong-arming politicians.

    That’s the idea. Without the fearsome black hovering in the shadows to scare the whities, there might not be justification for all that money being transferred from the taxpayers to the law enforcement community.

    Suddenly, Andy Griffiths style of law enforcement might seem to be enough. But then what would become of all those unemployed enforcers and their legal people. Might they be forced to resort to crime to sustain themselves?

    Simply put, the relationship between the parties involved is symbiotic. They need each other.

    • Agree: Jim bob Lassiter
  35. @Guyan

    I recall the satisfaction I felt when I read Horowitz’s writing about the attempt on the life of this nasty woman and her eventual suicide. I hope she suffered horribly.

  36. A highly intelligent woman, if not brilliant, whose life went totally off the tracks in a fruitless attempt to square circles while simultaneously pursuing a will o’ the wisp— only to end in tragedy. Very sad…very sad. Good article.

  37. Richard B says:
    @Anon

    What an excellent, on target comment.

    Too bad you ended it with this ludicrous non sequitur

    Too bad she apparently never found Christ and confessed her sins and received absolution. Let’s hope in the end she did in some small way.

    A very real and evil, White-hating jew is going to be redeemed by an imaginary jew worshiped by people who jews hate.

    Really, seriously, what is wrong with you guys?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Hibernian
  38. Good story; many good comments. Yet here we are again, whitey males in the cross hairs.

    • Replies: @Sir Launcelot Canning
  39. aandrews says:

    “A few radicals began to suspect the truth about convicts.”

    lolol

    duuuhhh

    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
  40. anarchyst says:

    It’s the JEWS…it’s always the JEWS…

    Our present situation and the devolving into the morass of “multiculturalism” and “diversity” is no accident. The jewish talmud and that jewish invention-communism has “rules” for the debasement of (white) civil society.

    The following statements are a result of personal experiences–your mileage may vary…

    I came of age during the first so-called “civil-rights” movement and saw for myself the underhanded dealings, the demonization of decent, law-abiding whites, and in general, the deterioration of civil society.

    Almost all of the “civil-rights” workers and demonstration “handlers” were of one persuasion–New York based leftist communist jews. They cared not one wit about true “civil rights”, but were there to create hate and discontent among their black charges (who were too stupid or naive to see that they were being used to suborn and destroy legitimate government and society–a favorite communist tactic).

    These New York-based “carpetbaggers” fomented their hate and discontent, only to become future “civil-rights” attorneys, race-hustlers, and America-hating leftist communists…and the ADL and $PLC being invented.

    Those of us whites who were in the middle of this “civil-rights” revolution had a saying: “Behind every negro, there is a jew”. No truer words were spoken.

    Let’s not forget their infestation of the nation’s education and entertainment systems, (which continues to the present day), in which they can spread their jewish supremacist poison.

    The so-called “non-violent civil-rights demonstrations” were anything but “non-violent”. Robberies, rapes, and other criminal acts were common, but never reported, as even the “mainstream media” was “in on the game” and conveniently turned off their cameras during the acts of violence. You see, even then,”creating crises” was a part of the agenda.

    The “beginning of the end” of America was the use of federal troops against white Americans, which, in itself was a violation of “posse commitatus”–the prohibition on the use of federal troops for domestic “law enforcement” purposes. As most whites were (and still are) law-abiding, they (we) were “steamrollered” by the use of federal troops to crush honest dissent. We never recovered from those unconstitutional actions. It was all downhill from there…

    The next step may be “civil-war” in which us whites will have to take back our birthright by force.

    • Agree: Sunshine
    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  41. segundo says:

    An excellent article. I knew the bare bones of this, but hardly any of the disgusting details. Keep up the good work!

  42. Although there is nothing new in this bizarre life story, it corroborates, for I don’t know many times, positions I’ve formed some time ago…

    1. Blacks turn everything to shit. I know, lovers of jazz will protest, but since I don’t give a hoot about jazz, I remain unmoved. Their all mental production is shit. Frantz Fanon, various American radicals turned writers, Richard Wright, James Baldwin, Toni Morrison…. this all is, more or less, shit. I’ve read it & their mental-emotional-spiritual universes are garbage. Worthless copies of copies of copies..of 3rd rate European authors. The same with music & visual arts.

    2. Jews have a death wish of a sort, at least radical ones. R.M. Nixon spoke about it privately. I’m not an anti-Semite, but it is evident they behave sometimes destructively & virtually always as alien species among other whites (visually, they are not very different from Mediterranean Europeans). Jewish “activism” is too evident to be overlooked- why was not there massive Irish, Italian, German-American, Greek, Scotch-Irish …. activism in USA? I’m not denying many contributions creative Jews have done to US (and the world) in various fields (cinema, exact sciences, linguistics, literature, culture dissemination, translators, violin virtuosi…)- but Jewish activism & politics have always been, perhaps with a few exceptions- bad news.

    There is not a grand plan to “destroy white civilization”, but Judaist Jews seem to be active in undermining the very fabric of normalcy, not just antiquated stuff that needs to be removed (but not violently). They support or are in alliance with: gays, blacks, Asians, Muslims, sex promiscuity, radical feminism, totalitarian tendencies, restriction of freedom of speech, destruction of American historical identity ….. with anyone non-Western or anti-Western.

    One could argue that they want more equality for everyone- not freedom, but equality. OK, let’s try this. If so- why were/are they not vocal in, say, defense of white Boers in South Africa? Or impoverished Russian masses during drunken Yeltsyn years? Or white victims of opioid epidemic in the US? Or British, French, …victims of “immigrant” violence?

    If Jews are, as political-social activists, one-dimensional & dogmatic- why is not their dogmatic activism “evenly distributed”, but always ends up as subversive of whites? If equality dogma & forced equalization are the real motivation- how come they don’t apply when whites/Euros are underdogs?

    3. as for blacks & Jews, here seems to be a strange dynamic at work (on Jews’ part). I don’t see they- Jews- get a thrill out of interaction with other races (Mestizos, various types of Asians, brown Muslims). True, they sometimes intermarry with the Chinese & other non-whites, but that’s more status-socio-economic matter. On the other hand, they drool & dance around blacks, many of them worthless & despicable lowlifes, as if they’re something Precious (really- Precious) & exciting.

    Blacks, save for a few Bible nuts & crazy fringe Christian cultists, don’t care about Jews. Jews, on the other hand- and, interestingly enough, mostly secular ones- seem to be fascinated with blacks as such. Is there something sexual about it? I don’t know, just it all looks like something deeper than a calculated coalition of fringes.

  43. Durruti says:
    @Oscar Peterson

    The most interesting part of this article is the last several paragraphs. The pattern of the Jew faux-leftist emerging later in life as a full-blown Judeonationalist/Judesupremacist is well established.

    Agree with your points, although you omitted the fitting conclusion – overview.

    THE ethnic cleansing of the PALESTINIAN NATION by the Zionist Land Thieves. This is the major crime being committed today; all other crimes stem from this one.

    It is significant that few Jewish leftists had time to criticize the racist Apartheid Entity. There were Jews who broke with their heritage. The Chessmaster Bobby Fisher converted, and denounced Zionism. Even Dylan converted to Christianity (for a while). Koestler (read The Thirteenth Tribe), a survivor of 3 Concentration Camps and early settler in Palestine (1930s), awoke, opposed Zionism, and immediately beat his wife, had sex with women, and raped 84 other women.

    https://www.amazon.com/Thirteenth-Tribe-Arthur-Koestler/dp/0945001428

    Harvey Weinstein supported a Movie – sympathetic to Palestinians, MIRAL, & also raped 84 women.

    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/harvey-weinstein-miral-critics-are-167548

    Weinstein is not an innocent, but he is innocent of the slanders printed in the Jewish owned & controlled Mainstream Media.

    Former Senator Franken was forced out of the Senate for his reluctance to be a puppet of the Entity.

    Understand, Weinstein & Franken are not heroes, perhaps decent humans. Some Jews do understand & wish to rejoin the Human Race. At the same time, the terrorist crimes & lack of empathy of the overwhelming majority of Jews for the rest of the human Race, is a problem.

    The Key for judging a People is how they treat others they have control over. Zionists, most Jews, are forever condemned before God and Lovers of Liberty, for their brutality against other humans. Their greed and hatred, (extermination of every living person & animal in Jericho, to their murder of Christ, to their genocide against the Palestinians), condemn them – for eternity. Need we recall the Zionist support for the Apartheid Government in South Africa, (where they constructed their Nuclear Bombs), which political trajectory/necessity led them to murder our last constitutional President, John F. Kennedy (as Kennedy insisted on ending Apartheid, and the disarming – de nuclearizing), of the Zionist entity.

    Rothschilds, Epstein, Maxwells, Polanski, Ehud Barak, Bill Clinton in a Blue Dress, – verb needed?

    The Zionist oligarchs murdered our last Constitutional President, John Kennedy, & our Republic, in a hail of bullets on November 22, 1963. These facts should have appeared in Nemmersdorf’s article, for Historical Balance. What happens in Oakland & Berkeley, happens all over the world!!!

    God Bless this website, and its Founder. [Get the point?]

    *Read his UNZarticles on the assassination of J F Kennedy, and responsibility for the 9/11 terror.

    Durruti

    • Agree: Druid
  44. @niteranger

    The Jewish owners of the NFL, and NBA are called “Slave and Plantation Masters by the Black Players and will attack them at a moments notice but the jew owners haven’t figured that out yet.

    “(T)he Black Players” are wealthy but unsophisticated young guys, too often dupes constantly being used by their Jew agents and the Jew league commissioners/owners as golem for the jews in their #jew$4WHITE.GENOCIDE initiative..

    LeBron was a big, bad militant ripping NFL team owners as “old white men” with “slave mentality”, but the instant he got reprimanded by the Jews’ Media for posting an instagram quoting lyrics mentioning jew wealth “We been getting that Jewish money; Everything is Kosher” he groveled to jew power.

    So he aggressively vilifies those he thinks of as white and cowers in obedience to those he knows to be jews.

  45. Anonymous[388] • Disclaimer says:
    @Richard B

    Bobby Fischer in a radio interview in 1999:

    “Jews are antisocial, destructive, intolerant, mean-spirited, deceitful. They wish to destroy, rule and kill, rob whoever gets in their way. To facilitate them getting what they want, they have developed a perverted, unnatural, destructive, evil lifestyle. Even though they live off the non-Jews as parasites, they still hate them and wish to destroy them. Jews hate nature and the natural order, because it’s pure and beautiful, and also because it’s bigger and stronger than they are, and they feel that they cannot fully control it. Nature’s beauty and harmony stands in stark contrast to their squalidness and ugliness, and that makes them hate it all the more… Jews are destroyers.”

    Now, a quote from from Bobby Fischer at the end of his life (from Endgame, Frank Brady’s biography of Fischer):

    “The only hope for the world is through Catholicism.”

    Nb: Fischer requested a Catholic burial and his funeral (mass?) was conducted by Father Jakob Rolland of the Diocese of Reykiavik.

  46. Sean says:

    Fay wanted to use Jackson’s trial to put the system in the dock, and fell out with Jackson because she saw him demanding for her bringing in guns for a breakout and escape to the hills to fight gorilla warfare plan as a obvious attempt to kill himself. Jackson in fact effectively commited suicide three days prior to the start of his murder trial for the 1970 killing of officer John Mills, According to the authorities Jacksons new lawyer Stephen Bingham brought in the gun Jackson used in the the takeover. Bingham was of the gentile elite, the very Waspiest of WASPs, but not in the intellectual class of Stender , who stunned experts with her musical ability, and was an ace appellate attorney. Just your average Jewish genius.

    He had shot Fay from a sense of loyalty to Jackson and other prisoners whom Fay had supposedly betrayed

    I think the source referenced actually said the very strong suspicion among Fay’s circle was that a nasty Latina paralegal who was counselor to the Hugo Pinell the Nicaraguan head of the Black Guerilla family, and said after the shooting that Fay got what she deserved, was responsible for inveigling Pinell into ordering the murder of Fay.

    The actual black Fleeta Drumgo tried to warn Stender through her daughter in the street a few days before the shooting that people were after her mother.

    ‘Yogi’ Pinell originally in prison for rape, had repeatedly attacked guards, and stabbed a guard to death a few months before he participated in Jackson’s riot and killed three guards and two white convicts by cutting their throat. He later stabbed his own lawyer in the throat with a pen.

    Jackson wore glasses, so a bit more intelligent than he sounds from his wasted life. Huey Newton was part Jewish.

    https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1979/7/6/sociobiology-pioneer-joins-black-panthers-probert/
    “At Harvard, I dealt with a lot of light and middleweight minds. It is a pleasure to come into contact with a real heavyweight mind, such as that of Huey, a man who has a great deal of genuine warmth and love for people and a very deep commitment to justice.” Trivers said in the same interview

  47. IstvanIN says:

    At least she suffered for a time before she killed herself. Some small consolation.

  48. Wiki’s description of her shooting is different by a fair piece from that depicted in this article. From Wiki, “In 1979, Black Guerrilla Family member Edward Glenn Brooks, recently paroled, entered Stender’s home in Berkeley, tied up her son, daughter, and her lover Joan Morris [9] and shot Stender several times for what he said was Stender’s betrayal of Jackson.”

    • Replies: @Alden
  49. White society is not perfect; it is not perfect because man’s nature and the world are not perfect. However, it is on balance just, and, above all, workable. To strain mightily to “perfect” the solid patterns of a settled society is to create tensions that inevitably build to an explosion.

    …indicted the entire justice system as “racist” without bothering to regard the nature of Black social pathology, or the damage that her activism could cause to a society that had settled itself around a workable solution to pervasive Black crime


    Whitey is The Golden Goose.

    “Black social pathology” and “pervasive Black crime” are realities, TRUTHS, for which blacks are solely responsible and of which blacks are the first but far from the only victims – society is victimized to a hideous degree. Blaming Whitey for black wrongdoing devastates society as this article describes, but it devastates blacks first and foremost.

    Whitey is The Golden Goose because his system of beliefs, values and rational judgment absent Jew subversion is the most beneficial thing to which the descendants of Black Africa have ever been exposed as black flourishing/thriving here in the USA relative to elsewhere has proven.

    Whitey is The Golden Goose because he brought the good news of God Incarnate Jesus to the descendants of Black Africa while others like jews attempt relentlessly to turn blacks away from God Incarnate Jesus.

  50. Sounds like she was powered by her hormones to me. She should have found a nice Jewish boy and settled down. Well, she served her purpose. Bob Dylan and his sick fucking music sucks anyway, nice to know HE’s an asshole, too.

    Meanwhile, here’s a Black Panther for the lot of them.

    • Replies: @Alden
  51. @Oscar Peterson

    Jew leftism is only a psychological sublimation of Jew hatred for Western Christian culture.

    Truth.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  52. Alden says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Whatever you think. One of their daughters was a coal burner BTW. They also owned a serf. The serf, Helen Demuth was a wedding present from Jennie’s parents. They all lived together in a nasty 3 room apartment in London with the 3 daughters of Jennie. Had Karl really loved Jenny he would not have had his son Frederick with Helene.

    Love, ain’t it loverly

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  53. fish says:
    @El Dato

    At a party the night of his release, reveling Panthers declared that Newton needed a woman; they corralled Fay and escorted the two to a bedroom. Fay was ecstatic and later bragged about it to female colleagues, some of whom were appalled.

    Ugh…..this makes me respect Newton even less (and I wasn’t sure that was possible)! In the first photo Faye Stender looks like middle aged Edward Teller!

    https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/scientist-edward-teller-news-photo/50658341

  54. Alden says:
    @Jim Christian

    Faye Stender did find a nice Jewish boy in University of Chicago law school, married him, brought him back to that lovely little communist town of Berkeley Ca had 2 kids and settled down.

    His name was Marvin Stender. He made a lot of money in his law practice was a good provider good husband good father. Like Faye, Marvin was raised by radical left Jewish parents. He was as much of a black loving White hating Jewish communist as she was.

    She met Marvin a good 15 years before she got involved with Huey. Huey was very handsome but Marvin was even more handsome. And a good husband and father not just another squirt and scram kneeegrow ghetto thug.

    Only a crazy communist Jew would choose Huey over Marvin.

    • Replies: @Jim Christian
  55. Alden says:
    @Jim Christian

    The news paper accounts in the Bay Area claimed Brooks knocked on the door came in with a gun went upstairs and shot her in bed as I remember. But it was a long time ago and wiki isn’t the most accurate source The author might have spoken with the son if he’s still alive.

    What a wonderful day that was. Sadly, Stender, Charles Garry and the 60’s radical Jews have triumphed.

    • Replies: @SeekingDirectEvidence
  56. Wally says:
    @Oscar Peterson

    Not surprising

    Scientists Discover Gene That Predisposes Ashkenazi Jews to Schizophrenia
    Variations of the DNST3 gene make Ashkenazi Jews 40 percent more likely to develop schizophrenia and similar diseases.
    ’: https://www.haaretz.com/.premium-ashkenazi-gene-increases-schizophrenia-1.5294333

    Does the strong Jew tendency towards mental illness assist in their ‘holocaust’ : fantasies?:https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12239

  57. Wally says:
    @Anon

    talk about foolishness:

    “she acknowledged the Arabs had a right to the land, but so did “the survivors of the Holocaust.”[105]”

    No doubt this twisted Fay Stender rationalized her hated of Euro whites because of Zionist “holocaust” propaganda.

    Amazing how that nonsense is used … but then that’s largely why it was contrived.

    • Replies: @Sean
  58. @Anon

    Whatever she found,it surely was not Christ!

  59. @Alden

    Faye Stender did find a nice Jewish boy in University of Chicago law school, married him, brought him back to that lovely little communist town of Berkeley Ca had 2 kids and settled down.

    I understand that. She had kids, but Marvin wasn’t a nice, if Jewish, boy and she didn’t settle down. She was a real psycho and (the both of them) promiscuous to the core. Wouldn’t surprise me if Marvin isn’t the father of her two spawn. Wonder how many abortions she had to rid herself of Black children that could only have been Black in between her stints with Marvin, who she only used.

    She tried to feed us the lie that Black criminality can be tempered, or maybe she thought she could buy their love. What a surprise. She probably felt like the backpacking lesbians in Pakistan about the time that guy shot her. I don’t wish for folks to have misfortune in advance, but this cunt right here, what happened to her makes me feel real fine in the aftermath. I hope she suffered, I hope her shit-bag ran over at the most inopportune times. But you know, our society is filled with cunts just like her, male and female. They are our ruin from which we’ll never recover. The Reiners, Larry David and Seinfeld, Chuck Lorre and Arohnson, each of them, their shows pushing the envelope, getting the ground ready for depravities untried until they pushed it in TV. And now, it’s over, all that’s left is the last bits of decline. Even the Jews and Israelis agree as they turn from the ruined husk they ruined that is the U.S. and attempt a pivot to China. Maybe they think they can escape the pitchforks here by going there. In any case, they’re using China for every big-buck project in Israel from the ports in Haifa to the new US Embassy in Jerusalem. They don’t even throw the Americans a fucking bone, not a shekel, even as they bleed us and ruin the society.

    That asswipes like Dylan worshiped these criminals tells me all I need to know about HIM, too.

    • Replies: @Alden
  60. @aandrews

    I suspect a large number of lefties, including far left radicals, like this nasty woman, operate under the Dunning-Kruger effect, the tendency to overestimate one’s understanding and abilities. Fuller and more accurate understanding of one’s abilities comes with time, and the more a wise man knows, the more he knows how little he really knows.

    The left, where good intentions count for more than knowledge and accuracy is the natural political home of radicals and children. With time, knowledge and experience, people move naturally rightward.

    We’ve all read innumerable personal accounts of people becoming more conservative. But in my slightly more than 50 years on earth, never have I read of a person moving politically right to left.

    • Replies: @Houston 1992
  61. Muggles says:

    My slogan for the public right now is : Read Atlas Shrugged.

    Yes, it was written circa 1956 and Ayn Rand’s prose seems over the top at times. But in this seminal novel she describes a world overrun with communist/socialist style collectivism very similar to what we are witnessing now. Here fictional hero John Galt lets the world suffer its deserved fate.

    This article above is another illustration of how Rand accurately depicts the moral corruption and consequences of evil collectivist ideas. When the Jim Jones massacre (also from the deep red Bay Area) occurred I was astonished at how that event was far worse than any fictional account of collectivism poison and its consequences that Rand penned. Jones was a villain out of Rand’s novel.

    Sure the “official” Objectivist movement was taken over by Rand nephew Leonard Piekoff after her death and is still run by that clan. Very poorly. But Rand’s novel is amazingly accurate in the effects of bad ideas held by opportunists and fools. With AOC and the rest of the neocommie socialists running the Democrat Party now, philosophical clarity is more vital than ever.

    You don’t have to subscribe to everything Rand wrote to grasp how prescient she was, this novel written at the cusp of Dwight Eisenhower’s second term. It holds up well. And predicts today.

  62. @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    Liberalism is a cover for the naked self interest of the jews.

    Political correctness is the collective will of the jews.

  63. Mulegino1 says:

    “She had read up on the Warsaw uprising of 1943, and was angered to find so little commemoration of the event in the city. She was well aware of the Jewish history in Poland and was in high dudgeon against Polish ‘Anti-Semitism.’ At the Warsaw Symphony she was ‘anguished by the absence of any musicians who looked even faintly Jewish.’”

    That’s because the real Warsaw Uprising happened in 1944, and was one of the most destructive battles of the Second World War. It involved the Polish Home Army revolting against the German occupation forces at the behest of the Soviets, whose armies remained in close proximity to the city on the eastern banks of the Vistula. The Red Army made no attempt to assist the uprising. The German commanders were so impressed by the valor of the Poles of the Home Army that they gave those captured prisoner of war status. Technically- as partisans- they could have executed them.

    The “Warsaw Ghetto Action” of 1943, on the other hand, which people like this ethnocentric Jewess obsess about, was a minor police action, carried out by the SS with the aid of Polish auxiliaries and involved no aircraft, heavy tanks or heavy artillery. I believe there was something like one half track involved, and the casualties were minuscule. Hollywood, of course, has helped to propagate the myth that this law enforcement action was the real “Uprising.”

  64. awry says:
    @Alden

    Then when gays became the fashionable liberal cause Faye became a lesbian of course.

    Looking at her ugly man face, she must have been a lesbian all along.

    • Replies: @fish
  65. @Alden

    Have their descendants reverted to the mean in terms of ethnocentrism etc

    • Replies: @Alden
  66. @Kolya Krassotkin

    Most RINO politicians and judges seem a little conservative before they reach DC. After a few months on the Georgetown party circuit they “grow” and “evolve “ garnishing “strange new respect.”

    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
  67. Alden says:
    @Jim Christian

    Never could stand Dylan’s gawd awful singing cracked croaking voice. Virtually every song he sang came straight out of The Anthology of American Folk Music. Husband loved Dylan back in the day so I listened to a lot of Dylan.

    One of Dylan’s first girl friends, the one on the album cover with him came from an important Jew communist family connected to the NYC music industry. He went right to the top soon as he met that family. Such a surprise.

    And Kathy Boudin went to the same hard left Quaker communist private school as Angela Davis.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  68. @Gidoutahere

    And until whitey males get organized it will remain that way. These Jews are ultra organized and well funded. Why aren’t white males?

  69. @Oscar Peterson

    Footnote- David Godman (aka Spengler) was once a close colleague of Lyndon LaRouche and helped write one of the Labor Committee’s most important books: Dope, Inc.

    https://archive.org/details/DopeInc.BritainOpiumWarAgainstTheUs1978.pdfVersion2/page/n1

  70. Sean says:
    @Wally

    “she acknowledged the Arabs had a right to the land,

    A right is something you can enforce (meaning it exists within a particular society) or it is nothing.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    , @Herald
  71. Alden says:
    @Muggles

    I remember reading the part of Atlas Shrugged where the rich liberals had a party and blathered their liberal do gooder philosophy. It was identical to the way my parents San Francisco wealthy kneeegrow loving friends spoke and thought. I don’t know why my parents had a book so diametrically opposed to their save every worthless critter and foment a liberal revolution in their house.

    On the other hand, Fountain Head glorified Brutalist architecture.

    • Replies: @Hamlet's Ghost
  72. @Bardon Kaldian

    “There is not a grand plan to “destroy white civilization”, but Judaist Jews seem to be active in undermining the very fabric of normalcy, not just antiquated stuff that needs to be removed (but not violently). ”

    Judaism itself is the grand plan to destroy White civilization. Jews do not create conspiracies, they themselves are the conspiracy. Their sole reason for being is to destroy Europeans and the societies we create. If you disagree, ask yourself what else do Jews do.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  73. Alden says:
    @Houston 1992

    I don’t know. Her son was there when Brooks killed Fay. The kids were raised in Berkeley. They were teens in the 60’s when the Oakland blacks wreaked terror in Berkeley. The good White commies of course defended the criminals and attacked the Berkeley police constantly.

    I remember a patrol officer heard a woman screaming in a park. He interrupted a rape in progress. Black Oakland worthless scum White UC student. The black told the cop, “ lemme finish” and refused to get off the victim. So the cop shot him in the butt and dragged him off the victim.

    The Berkeley good Whites led by the Stenders and other Jews had a fit at this police brutality and forced the Berkeley police chief to go on TV and publicly apologize because the officer had to shoot the rapist to get him off the victim.

    • Replies: @Lloyd
  74. Cyrano says:

    I read somewhere once that Nietzche 10 years before his death saw a horse being whipped by its owner on the street in Turin – I believe – then he run down to the street, hugged his fellow co-sufferer – the horse, went mad and never recovered.

    I guess it depends on the person’s imagination who are they going to pick as “fellow co-sufferers”. The fact that this particular nasty woman picked the blacks, shows not only wild imagination, but mental sickness as well.

    Blacks have no choice in whether they are different or not. Jews have that choice. They want to be different, but they don’t want to be treated differently – meaning worse. When you have no country for close to 2 millenniums, you wander around the world, and depend on the kindness of strangers, the basic minimum that you can do – and which common sense should compel you to do – is to try to be like the ones whose countries you are immigrating to are.

    If you try to preserve your “identity” and if as a result of that you are treated differently – in a sense worse – then, I am sorry to say, but you probably have brought it on yourself. So don’t start looking around for various miscreants with whom you’re going to identify as “fellow co-sufferers”.

    • Agree: Druid
    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  75. Anon[263] • Disclaimer says:

    If you can tolerate it, here’s a radio interview with Lise Pearlman on Fay Stender:

  76. @Richard B

    It’s not as if Jews “make” black people hate whites. Blacks have their own associations and organizations that cater strictly to them, universtiies and colleges churches and communties, which they enjoy. They have their own and are quite protective of it, they just want everyone else’s too and don’t want you. I feel they would be that way even without the Jews. I don’t care if they want to be racist but that should go for everyone. Pretty much the only people that can be discriminated against are “white supremacist bigots”.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    , @Richard B
  77. @Alden

    Are you sure they ever even read it? Ayn Rand may have had a first-rate intellect but she was a godawful fiction writer.

    • Replies: @Muggles
    , @Achilles Wannabe
  78. @Houston 1992

    I should have noted that I was talking about private citizens. But your point is well taken.

    Professional politicians LIE, no matter what their party affiliation. The ability to LIE with ease and smoothness is the sine qua non of being a politician, and I wonder what the McCains, the Ryans, the Romneys and the Bushes, who “grow” in office, really believe in their heart of hearts.

  79. @Staudegger

    Judaism, as it has crystallized over past 1500-2000 years, has nothing for or against “white civilization”. It is a typical Levantine ethnocentric theocratic cult, with all its obsessions over food, dress & other taboos. Nothing more.

    • Replies: @Staudegger
  80. @Sir Launcelot Canning

    White males don’t own the Federal Reserve.

  81. @anonspeech

    Blacks’ motto: what is mine is mine only; what is yours is mine, too.

  82. eah says:

    Good article about horrible people and a trip down memory lane for me.

    Yes, interesting and informative — while most of the names are very familiar, some of the details had been forgotten; however I did remember the judge with the shotgun taped to his neck.

    It annoyed me some to see Stender referenced familiarly as “Fay” pretty much throughout the entire article; this unfortunate practice is rather common nowadays, the most egregious example being how Hillary Rodham Clinton is called “Hillary” all the time — the familiar/first name simply should not be normally used, especially for this base woman; for the main reason why, see the video of her cackling like a psychopath over the gruesome murder of Gaddafi.

    I see Wikipedia has retconned most of these guys who were, in large part, violent criminals — eg on the disambiguation page, George Jackson is an “activist” (also on his main page), and on his Wikipedia page he’s a “an African-American author” — Eldridge Cleaver “was an American writer, and political activist” — Huey Newton “was a revolutionary African-American political activist”.

  83. @Alden

    One of their daughters was a coal burner BTW

    Not true. Laura Lafargue was married to a Creole, physician & socialist Paul Lafargue. He was a Creole who looked white. True, Marx and Engels had made racist jokes about Lafargue in private communications, but Marx was “softened” by Lafargue’s good financial position at the time. Be as it may, Lafargue didn’t look black or mulatto (one can look at his photos).

    They also owned a serf. The serf, Helen Demuth was a wedding present from Jennie’s parents. They all lived together in a nasty 3 room apartment in London with the 3 daughters of Jennie. Had Karl really loved Jenny he would not have had his son Frederick with Helene.

    This is a popular myth. True, Helene Demuth, Marx’s servant, did have a child out of wedlock, but it remained unknown who the father of Frederick Demuth, her son, was. Engels has acknowledged paternity to spare Helene of embarrassment in Victorian England. In socialist circles, after Marx’s death, a gossip – instigated by wives of German socialist emigres – began to circulate that Marx was the real father of Helene’s son. But, there is no substantial corroboration for that claim. It is just a tale which many modern biographers have uncritically adopted.
    https://reviews.history.ac.uk/review/1474

    The early period of the Marxs’ life in London was also overshadowed by the birth of an illegitimate child. Their housekeeper, Helene Demuth, gave birth to a son, Frederick, in 1851. The reputed father was Marx, although the unmarried Engels claimed paternity, allegedly to save Marx’s reputation and marriage. The story of Marx’s paternity is a telling example of the way his biography has been a battlefield of political interests. In another recent Marx biography Paul Thomas has cast doubts on the veracity of the story. Thomas highlights that the story was first included in Marx biographies in the 1960s, politically highly charged times. He also points out that the account is based on one single source: a letter written by the wife of the social democrat Karl Kautsky in 1898, who had never met Marx. It is this letter that recounted the supposed deathbed revelation of Engels about the true paternity of Helene Demuth’s son. No other source ever mentioned the story, and the addressee of the letter, August Bebel, never brought it up. Most notably there is no evidence of such a rumour circulating around the time of Frederick Demuth’s birth itself, when Marx’s many political opponents in London would have devoured any opportunity for gossip about him.(9) Sperber, however, defends the fact that Marx fathered the child, although, taking into account chronological evidence, he struggles to establish when the child could have been conceived (p. 262). Whether one believes Thomas’ account or Sperber’s, the issue shows that details of Marx’s life remain controversial.

    • Replies: @Alden
  84. Muggles says:
    @Hamlet's Ghost

    Sure, some of her plots were rather operatic, but if you re-read her description of life in America when Galt & Co. bugged out, you will find it rather mild compared to what we now have.

    Jim Jones made Rand look like a wimp. AOC & Comrades? The entire crop of neo commie Dems?

    This was all written approx. 65 years ago. Who else was describing future Eisenhower America (now under collectivist mania) in such accurate terms during the mid 50s?

    When those Boeing Max 787’s started dropping out of the sky, I recalled the same “godawful” fiction as you call it being depicted by Ms. Rand. Airplanes falling out of the sky due to collectivist engineering and construction was one of her signs of the apocalypse in Atlas Shrugged.

    Who else’s fiction (yes, as I said originally, over the top) is so widely read today? Who wrote of future American socialism worship and rabid collectivist “cancelling” other than Rand at that time? Not a long list… And she was denounced fiercely for being so pessimistic. By everyone on the political spectrum. Libertarians (other than Rothbard) didn’t even exist at the time.

  85. @Sean

    Wooo woo! Such wisdom! I hereby declare that I have a right to your mother’s poon. If you or she or any other of your mouth-breathing brethren cannot defend it, I WILL have a right to it.

    How do you like them apples, huh? It is easy to sit back in your whatever and expound on concepts like “rights,” BUT IT IS ANOTHER TO LIVE THEM.

    Note: Yes, I agree with you completely. A right is nothing unless you can defend it or it is part of your — large — environment in which it exists. The Bill of Rights was a real thing in America when it existed in an environment conducive to its function and purpose.

  86. Herald says:
    @Sean

    A right is something you can enforce (meaning it exists within a particular society) or it is nothing.

    On that basis there is no right other than might. What a sordid viewpoint.

    • Replies: @Sean
  87. first-rate essay on a run-of-the-mill (((Red Princess))); here’s a few others:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20190809032808/http://seductivejewess4.com/kosher-tropes-j-the-red-princess

    one caveat:

    the Blacks didn’t “use” Fay Stender;

    Jews, who have smarts + $$$ but not numbers,

    used and continue to use Blacks and many others for their own Tribal machinations.

    at present they have formatted Blacks in ‘Murka into an increasingly efficient

    anti-White Einsatzgruppe.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  88. Angharad says:

    Brilliant article. Jews and Blacks LOVE mayhem and chaos, don’t they? And especially they love murdering Whites.

    The true fact details of this article provide a stark clarity for Whites to demand and GET complete separation from these savage genetic FIENDS.

  89. Lloyd says: • Website
    @Alden

    So it’s worse to be raped than to be shot?

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @Angharad
  90. @Haxo Angmark

    jews give agency to blacks, mexicans, asians, gays, etc.,the entire rainbow coalition, to destroy white Christian civilization.

    The non-whites are the foot soldiers for the nose.

    The “civil rights” movement was engineered by jews to disempower white people.

    David Duke and Don Black were right 50 years ago when they were teenagers…..and nobody was listening.

  91. Dannyboy says:

    Oh, poor Fay…lol

    Every once in a while beautiful serendipity occurs in our world.

    SPLC filth are mugged and stabbed to death by niggers.

    Dumb cunt white traitor whores who a make a living coddling goatfuckers and spics are raped and beaten to death by the misguided objects of their affections.

    And sometimes dirty nigger enabling Jews are gunned down by their own special little pets.

    Too bad the coon didn’t shoot her brat as well.

  92. Sean says:
    @Herald

    Not at all. The weakest child has rights that cannot be violated with impunity, but that is because if you violate their rights the law will concentrate the necessary amount of coercive power to stop and punish you. All that is within a particular society that agrees to those laws.

    Societies contain rights, individuals or peoples don’t have them. Being outside a particular society abstract human rights are nonsense, just a way to attack societies from within and without.

    • Replies: @Herald
  93. @Cyrano

    ‘… When you have no country for close to 2 millenniums, you wander around the world, and depend on the kindness of strangers, the basic minimum that you can do – and which common sense should compel you to do – is to try to be like the ones whose countries you are immigrating to are…’

    But the ones who do that soon cease to be Jews.

    Almost necessarily, each generation of Jews consists disproportionately of those unwilling or unable to assimilate.

  94. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @Alden

    I used to play in a band with a guy whose parents were bigtime revival preachers and he was no longer into organized religion but he really believed Dylan had “gone to the crossroads” a la Robert Johnson. Looking back at his career and how bad he really was originally….well, it’s kind of spooky sometimes.

    Someone or something was looking out for Dylan, it does seem sometimes. Although like Warhol it may have been more of being the right kind of fool at the right time in the right place.

  95. Alden says:
    @Lloyd

    The rapist was shot, and not seriously wounded, not the victim. Epitome of how liberals and Jews side with black criminals against police.

  96. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @Muggles

    Rand was a Russian Jewess (and I use the term Russian Jewess in the true sense: many Jews in Russia were in no wise Russian, but many were in many ways quite so, and she was one) who hated being Russian, hated being Jewish, hated being a woman. But she was not stupid. Her intelligence and drive combined with her internal conflicts and fixations resulted in her work.

    And it has a certain appeal, but ultimately it’s as unreal and as false as Marx. It is contrary, ultimately, to human nature. Galt’s Gulch is like the Soviet New Communist Man, a theoretical ideal that can not and never will exist.

    • Replies: @S
    , @Hibernian
  97. Alden says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Marx didn’t like the quadroon son in law. Frederick was widely acknowledged to be Karl’s son. Frederick was the only one of the family not a Marxist revolutionary. The Haitian son in law and coal burner daughter were heavily involved in the 1871 Paris Commune Revolution. The French government troops wiped the Communards out. Good, I hope everyone of them died a horrible painful death.

    Too bad any of those Bolshevik ever made it to America. Don’t try to whitewash Marx and his followers such as Prison Law Project , Fay and Marvin Stender. They are nothing but a destructive force and I knew them all when they were in their glory days. They used Lyndon Johnson for funding and invaded California and destroyed it.

    Admire Marx and his legacy if you want. I saw what his followers did.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  98. Danvil says:

    She is a perfect copy of the Jews found in E Michael Jones’ book, “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit”.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  99. Alden says:
    @Jim bob Lassiter

    Faye Stender, Stanley Anne Dunham, Lynn Stewart and all those White mostly Jewish women who had black sex partners were raised be very very hard left parents who encouraged it.

    One goal was to produce the ultimate triumph, Obama. Overall the goal was to breed a revolutionary cohort of light skinned average intelligence black Jews who would lead America into the mess we have today

    It succeeded all too well.

    • Replies: @Monotonous Languor
  100. anon20 says:
    @unit472

    Being with a black guy is probably the dumbest thing a white girl can do.

  101. Herald says:
    @Sean

    There are certain inalienable rights which clearly exist whether or not they are backed by a some society’s rules or its policing arrangements. That there are violations of these rights that often go unpunished has no bearing on the fundamental nature of those rights.

  102. Anonymous[375] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The Jewish attraction to Blacks is pretty simple. Blacks have the physical brawn jews wish they had.

    I watched ‘Once Were Kings’, the Muhammad Ali documentary. It was really striking to see these Jewish sports writers and intellectuals smiling like children when discussing Ali. Norman Mailer looked like he was about to cream his jeans while relaying some anecdote. I was young when I saw the film and not even aware of this dynamic, I didn’t even know these guys were Jewish at the time, but even then I found this absurd fawning strange.

    Everything Ali did was like magic to these guys… I watched and couldn’t understand their glee. You had guys with 150 IQs completely entranced by this black guy making silly children’s rhymes and acting goofy. It was embarrassing to witness.

    I’m of the opinion the entire Muhammad Ali ‘cult’ is pretty much a creation of these Jews. They loved that he was physically what they could never be, and that he resisted the draft and dabbled in radical politics… even though it would be a stretch to believe he even understood much of this stuff.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  103. fish says:
    @awry

    Fay was disenchanted and depressed. She had turned forty. She had lost her female lover, was losing her husband, and her most cherished political cause had blown up in her face. It was 1973, and the entire “Movement” had sputtered to a halt and was in the process of metamorphosing; the radicals had lost their faith in militant activism outside “the system” and began to enter that system in droves to work from within. The process was not smooth; many leftists spent years coming to terms with the collapse of the movement.

    You would have to have a heart of stone not to laugh!

    – somebody

  104. Angharad says:
    @Lloyd

    Lloyd – the Nigra would not have been shot if he hadn’t been raping. Capiche? Too bad the cop didn’t finish the job.

  105. Saggy says: • Website
    @Bardon Kaldian

    If you don’t like black music then there is simply no hope for you understanding or appreciating black people. So, give it up, you are just talking mindless shit.

    And it ain’t just me, for Christ’s sake, blacks have dominated popular music and dance in the US for 100 years – google Lindy Hop.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  106. jsigur says:

    This is what (((They))) do. The crackdown on free speech I strongly believe was connected to many whites becoming aware of what they do.
    OF course the subversion is subservient to bringing about a NWO run by Jews and they’ve been doing it since Paul got his vision on the road to Damascus and decided to quit prosecuting Jews and start conning whites or pagans

  107. It’s with sadness for her children and her parents that I state this: she was a complicated person, whose lust for life and perhaps private ghosts led her to shonda.

    • Replies: @Alden
  108. Hibernian says:
    @Richard B

    Some people believe in Him as Lord and Savior, others don’t. As to His being imaginary, He is just as real as Julius Caesar and other historical figures of that era.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  109. So… all descendants of slaves from Africa are and always have been hopeless violent criminals who are not endowed by their creator with any inalienable rights? This author is astonishingly lacking in vision. So contrary to the principles the country was founded on. Leaves the reader with no hope. No inspiration. Just more darkness for the darkest side of human darkness.

    After decades of occasionally and half-heartedly thinking about converting to some non-committed form of Judaism, this article is the strongest incentive I’ve had in a long time to finally do it, simply because people like the blind-man-talking author of this piece have not quite yet faded away.

    Maybe the author isn’t old enough to have personally witnessed the degree of injustice African Americans suffered (the word “suffered” chosen very intentionally) for generations in the U.S. If you were alive in the 1950s and 60s, you may remember how sickening it was, and how much BETTER things are now. Yes, BETTER.

    There was a young man by the name of Carl Hampton, a devoted church-going, patriotic American, model high-school student and football star who enlisted to serve his country in the 1960s. He returned to his home-town aware of how much he was hated by whites — who did not know him, or his fine character, or his life-plan to be of service to others and do what’s right — simply because he was not white. Nevertheless, in true Christian form, when he returned home, he got busy doing one of the many selfless and honorable things whites accuse blacks of never doing. This guy, Carl Hampton, to the best of his early-20s ability, started helping people in Houston who were unskilled, unhoused, and hungry get skills, shelter, and food. (How many Unz readers have ever gone out into the real world of modern white-homelessness and actually tried to do anything about it?) Then one day, Carl Hampton went outside unarmed. And he was murdered in cold blood by Houston police who’d been hiding on the roof of a nearby building, waiting. Waiting with loaded guns to put an end to the life of a guy whose Christian dedication to helping people who needed help was not a fit with their demonic false image of African Americans.

    And even though the author probably would at least privately acknowledge that there are people of all kinds who will fight injustice across the board, including injustice against white men (me for one) — the unstated basis of this piece is the idea that white men have every right to fight injustice against white men, but anyone who isn’t a white man has no right to fight injustice they face against themselves.

    Is a vision of people getting along with each other, standing for justice, not Christian enough? Could suffocating hypocrisy help explain why non-Christians cringe and circle the wagons? And get busy defending ideals of people like George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson?

    Too often, I leave Unz ashamed once again to be Euro-American. And I want to make a reasonable request: For every charge you make against “the Jews,” ask yourself if that charge doesn’t apply at least equally to other groups. Be objective. If it does, either drop the charge, or acknowledge a more complete spectrum that it applies to.

    p.s. The Black Panthers brought unloaded guns to “photo opps,” but they also defended themselves with guns when violently attacked with guns in places like Houston and Oakland. Attacked because they were actively taking a stand against the injustice they faced. Following the thinking of a realistic white male, they fought, in full First-Amendment form, against a system that tyrannized them.

  110. @Anonymous

    Everything Ali did was like magic to these guys… I watched and couldn’t understand their glee. You had guys with 150 IQs completely entranced by this black guy making silly children’s rhymes and acting goofy. It was embarrassing to witness.

    No, while Ali was no intellectual genius, he had a genius for celebrity. He was a real personality, something most boxers are not. He was a great boxer and had comic instinct like the Marx brothers.
    Also, he stood by his conviction when he gave up his championship for conscience during the Vietnam War. He really paid a price(something Kapernick never did) and climbed his way back to the top by doing the impossible, KO’ing Foreman(who topped that feat at the age of 45 by regaining championship). You gotta give him credit.

    Jews, like most people, are drawn to the best in anything. Blacks are best in sports. Jews are also drawn to Aryan female beauty. Woody Allen’s movies are neurotic valentines to them. So are the films of Albert Brooks.

    And it’s not just Jews. All those white cucks in Southern universities who cheer for black football and basketball player are not Jewish. They are southern boys who’ve come to terms with cucky-wuckery as it’s pretty much over for the white race. Sad thing is white race may take down other races by spreading jungalo fever all over the world. It’s like white race, in serving Jews, also spread globo-homo all over.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  111. Miro23 says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    There is not a grand plan to “destroy white civilization”, but Judaist Jews seem to be active in undermining the very fabric of normalcy, not just antiquated stuff that needs to be removed (but not violently). They support or are in alliance with: gays, blacks, Asians, Muslims, sex promiscuity, radical feminism, totalitarian tendencies, restriction of freedom of speech, destruction of American historical identity ….. with anyone non-Western or anti-Western.

    There’s no grand plan to “destroy white civilization” like there’s no grand plan about which way to go in a shoal of fish – but the movements still look to be highly choreographed.

    This suggests that if there was only one Jew left in the world he/she would be a radical one person sh-t stirrer. No community or religion required – so it looks like some kind of destructive hard wired genetic arrangement.

  112. @Sir Launcelot Canning

    Wherever 3 white gentile males are gathered together, one will be an FBI agent

  113. @Alden

    Next step in the master plan: they’ll be trying to do the same with the Chinese.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Alden
  114. @anarchyst

    it is emerging that there is a certain kind of boomer who is and was not necessarily brain dead: the Southern White. Who would have guessed it?

  115. @unit472

    Now try re-reading the article looking for DIRECT evidence of all the shocking statements. The author takes gargantuan liberties in saying whatever helps pile more invective on the subject, supportable or not. Just pointing out a fact.

    • Replies: @anon_231
    , @Alden
  116. MarkinLA says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    The Panthers were no better than the KKK.

  117. Richard B says:
    @Anonymous

    Fair enough. That’s one down. How many more to go?

  118. Richard B says:
    @Hibernian

    As to His being imaginary, He is just as real as Julius Caesar and other historical figures of that era.

    That’s exactly right. And, just for the record, I was baptized a Catholic. And, though I left the church, I have nothing against it, Christianity, or Jesus Christ. I just don’t consider him my Lord and Savior.

    I simply wanted to contrast an historical figure with something very real indeed. As in, a real threat.

  119. Richard B says:
    @anonspeech

    Yet another boring JIDF Troll.

    The only supremacists in the world are jews.

    Just as there’s only one KKK. The Kvetching Kosher Khazars.

    You know, trolls like you.

  120. Guyan says:
    @Alden

    When I heard that she committed suicide,I was ecstatic. As a former Trotskyist living in Sausalito at the time, I saw that White men were becoming passe and that White and Jewish women were interested in Black men . A few years earlier myself , a Jewish guy and 3 Irish American men (all of us ex Trots) started a men’s conscious raising group to talk about our oppression .
    My sex life then revolved around transient White women , massage parlors , and drunk older White women whom I met driving a cab.

  121. @Alden

    The report I remember was that her son answered the door, was asked if Faye was home, son called for Fay, Fay went to the door, and was shot. In any case, the entire story above leaves out a lot of facts, and adds a lot of unsupported ideas, about the life and times of Fay Stender. This article is one of those times when you need to dig a lot deeper to get a more accurate image of what actually happened. The author himself knows how much he indulged in making things up and exaggerating to create his case.

    • Replies: @Alden
  122. anon[234] • Disclaimer says:
    @Muggles

    My slogan for the public right now is : Read Atlas Shrugged.

    LOL, hello Boomer!

    • Replies: @Jim Christian
  123. @Hamlet's Ghost

    Amen to that. I lashed myself religiously to keep reading Atlas just to find out what the great libertarian was about. I got to 250 or so and broke down. I’m no literary critic so I can’t really say why it doesn’t work as a novel. But am I alone in noticing the sadomasochistic qualities of the heroine? Spirited entrepreneur that she is, she do love to submit to the hero, huh? f curse it was the 50’s so you had to read between the lines. When I hear about Congressman Paul Ryan saying he got his intellectual chops from that book, I think of little Paul in his room with his dick in his hand

  124. anon[234] • Disclaimer says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    Next step in the master plan: they’ll be trying to do the same with the Chinese.

    They can try, but they will fail. The Han are not high-trust inner Hajnal suckers. Not even close.

  125. @Anonymous

    Given the 60’s zeitgeist, I think Dylan was a genius. Whether one approves of that zeitgeist is another question

    • Replies: @Alden
  126. @Muggles

    I was thinking of Rand’s views as I read this fascinating article.

    Folks like Stender that ignore reality get burned eventually.

    Stender’s suicide was beautifully symbolic–first she worked 24/7 to suicide western civilization–then she offed herself.

    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
  127. @Miro23

    Good point. Jews don’t need to meet secretly in smoke free rooms to plan the Revolutionary materialist Zio order. They just need to be Jews. Being a Jew is reflexive. If it wasn’t they probably would have stopped being Jews a long time ago. Jewish history isn’t the sob story they have turned it into but it wasn’t easy.

  128. @Saggy

    Popularity of something does not mean it is of any worth. Jazz, rap,… were& are popular.

    And they’re shit.

    Harry Potter’s books are ultra-popular.

    And they’re shit.

    It just means that a very big chunk of a population consists of mindless morons.

    • Agree: Poco
  129. @Alden

    Are you capable of rational thought?

    I presented to you that whatever Lafargue’s possible ancestry may have been, he was visually indistinguishable from other whites- so there was no case of “coal burning” in his case; and evidence for Marx’s paternity in the case of Frederick Demuth is flimsy & actually non-existent.

    These are the facts.

    The rest is fantasy & rubbish.

    • Replies: @Alden
  130. @Priss Factor

    Jews, like most people, are drawn to the best in anything. Blacks are best in sports.

    Blacks are best is sports popular only in the US, with some exceptions. If you look at 20 most highly rated sports in the world, you’ll see that whites dominate most sports: https://list25.com/25-most-popular-sports-in-the-world/

    Also, although I don’t care much for any sport, I’ve seen that media glorify (consciously?) blacks in any sport.

    As for Ali, I agree- he was a great entertainer, boxer & had a charismatic personality.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Bookish1
  131. Stender’s cautionary tale will not dissuade a single Chosenite from “helping” the Noble Negro.

    The schvartzes are too useful as weapons against Whites.

  132. @Miro23

    Could be. But, Jewish presence is not the crucial factor is West’s suicidal trajectory. It can be seen in lands where there are virtually no Jews, or if they are there, they don’t have much power (Italy, Germany, Sweden, Finland, Spain,..).

    Suicidal immigration policy, for instance, in these countries has nothing to do with Jewish activism. You can add Britain or New Zealand or any other country with similar problems- the suicidal behavior of affluent white countries is homegrown & the result of disintegration processes of those European or Europe-derived peoples, and not of any Jewish activism.

    The same can be said of the US, where Jews are powerful & influential. If Euro-Americans had not been prone to decadence, excess, idiotic self-ruination themselves, no amount of Jewish activism would have mattered.

    • Agree: Miro23, Cyrano
  133. @Justvisiting

    “Folks like Stender that ignore reality get burned eventually.”

    I wish such nutjobs were limited to the left. But on the right we have whackos like Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney, the miscellaneous Bushes and now Charlie Cuck and his traveling freak show, still pretending that more of the same quackery that Conservatism, Inc. has peddled for the last 50 years will save the republic. In their own crazy ways, they’re as out of touch with reality as Bernie Sanders, Liz Warren and AOC.

  134. @Anonymous

    He has the voice of an adenoidal goat. Shelter From The Storm reminds me of the braying of a Billy Goat, I swear to Gawd..

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    , @Alden
  135. @anon

    LOL, ignore the lessons of Rand, it’s bye-bye Millennial. And no great loss at that. No great loss.

  136. S says:
    @Anonymous

    And it has a certain appeal, but ultimately it’s as unreal and as false as Marx. It is contrary, ultimately, to human nature. Galt’s Gulch is like the Soviet New Communist Man, a theoretical ideal that can not and never will exist.

    She was a proselyte for artificially hyper-individualistic Capitalism whose counterpart were the equally fanatic proselytes for artificially hyper-collectivist Communism with their hammer and sickle symbol.

    I saw a movie on the life of Ayn Rand. There was a scene where she was shown drawing upon a dusty window sill with her finger tip the symbol she had decided upon to represent her Randian ‘objectivist’ libertarian ideology in all it’s true meaning and glory.

    Appropriately enough, it was the dollar sign ‘$’.

  137. anon_231 says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    The author takes gargantuan liberties in saying whatever helps pile more invective on the subject, supportable or not.

    who cares?

    that’s what joomedia does to whites every day for over 100 years

  138. Alden says:
    @Really No Shit

    Her parents were hard left communist Jews who joyfully participated in every left wing cause that came along. They moved to Berkeley and raised her there because it was the hard left communist strong hold of California at the time.

    • Replies: @Really No Shit
  139. Alden says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    I remember it all and I remember when criminal blacks and communist revolutionary Jews like Stender took over San Francisco Oakland, Berkeley Richmond and Pittsburgh.

    We had a big party to celebrate her death and I’m proud we did. Ding dong the witch was dead!

  140. Alden says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Marxists like you believe the Marxist lies. The rest of the world knows the truth.

    And the Communard revolution was severely put down by the French army as every other communist revolution should have been.

    The incalculable harm marxist jews like the Stenders and their Jewish friends did to N California is blatant and obvious, just as the harm communism did to Russia Central Asia and Eastern Europe is.

    Enjoy your fantasies of a glorious marxist world that never was and never will be.

  141. Issar says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    Hey. Thanks for your comment. I just plowed through 108 of these things. Until now, no sign of pushback against the group think. All I can say is, ‘hey, they’re right– also completely wrong.’ And isn’t that true of any group of people blinded by some specialized ideology? The Jews maybe? Though I am grateful to the author to learn about this fascinating story– he is an obvious ‘misguided individual’ with a Torquemada complex. He’s going to put ‘Fay’ on the rack. As far as ‘the Jews’ go, it’s a big topic and extremely complex phenomena.

    I hope to comment on the article later. For now, after all the slander and weird comments, all I can say is– she’s my kind of gal. Let’s call it ‘the Jewish revolutionary spirit.’ Ha ha. Fay Stender didn’t kill anybody. The deaths were thanks to the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) Bingham weirdo who brought Jackson the gun.

  142. @Alden

    No doubt they were leftists and if that was their cross to bear then so be it. But I was referring to feelings of parents toward its children’s behavior, especially, when facts come to be known that she, Fay Stender, had become a common whore to black murderers in prison. Only a meshuggah would not think about what others would think!

    • Replies: @Alden
  143. @Bardon Kaldian

    I would recommend you read Mark Brahmin’s dissectiona of Judaism and Jewish art at The Apollonian Transmission. He shows that, far from being just a “typical Levantine ethnocentric cult,” it is specifically a religion that posits Whites as its enemy and teaches Jews how to infiltrate, subvert, and come to rule over White hosts. Start here:

    http://theapolloniantransmission.com/the-bride-gathering-cult/

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  144. MarkinLA says:
    @Jim Christian

    There was this funny skit on the Dan Patrick show where “The Boss” and Dylan were being idolized. One of the guys said their voices stink and went into alternate immitations of Dylan and Springsteen. It was so funny everybody in the studio – even those idolizing those two had to laugh.

    • Replies: @MikeatMikedotMike
  145. Alden says:
    @Really No Shit

    Her parents might not have been alive when she dumped Marvin for black criminals. Being Jewish communists who choose to raise their children in Berkeley and brainwash them from birth in the noble Jewish cause of saving scared blacks from the evil White goyim her parents might have approved. Or might not have.

    But don’t judge hard left Jewish communists by your standards. They have different standards.

  146. Alden says:
    @Jim Christian

    Goats bleating is far more harmonious and pleasant than Dylan’s voice. And before he had extensive plastic surgery he was just hideous, hideous. He was more ugly but slightly less repulsive than Woody Allen.

    He’s an excellent example of how the media and music industry can take a man with a horrible face and even worse voice, buy a copy of The Anthology Of American Folk Music, change his last name, and turn him into a musical icon

  147. Alden says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    How was he a genius? Every single song he sang the first 10 years came straight out of The Anthology if American Folk Music

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  148. Anonymous[388] • Disclaimer says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    All this stuff is way before my time so I just read up on Carl Hampton. Sounds like a peach of a guy. Heavily-armed militant Black Panther, pulling a concealed gun on a cop, barricading himself against police, etc. Innocent salt-of-the-earth Christian man that Carl Hampton. LMAO.

    Long Live the Revolutionary Spirit of Carl Hampton!!!

    http://www.itsabouttimebpp.com/Chapter_History/Police_Assassination_of_Carl_Hampton.html

  149. Dannyboy says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    I’m gonna cut you some slack, because after reading your heartfelt, idealistic , yet deeply flawed and even contradictory bullshit, it’s obvious you’re probably a Millennial.

    Too often, I leave Unz ashamed once again to be Euro-American.

    First off, I’d bet my left nut that you were taught quite a while ago to be ashamed of being “Euro-American”… known here in the US as “white”.

    Secondly, Washington and Jefferson were both Virginian slaveholders who were essentially “white supremacists”. Adams may not have owned niggers personally, but the entire society around him certainly had no problem with it, and in fact enriched themselves on it nearly till the eve of the Civil War.

    http://slavenorth.com/

    Thirdly, you may wish to check with your Leftist Jew Commissars before extending the faux olive branch, because they are busy doing their level best to eradicate the memory of the “old dead racist whiteboys” you pretend to admire.

  150. Alden says:
    @SeekingDirectEvidence

    I was right there in the middle of it all. I knew those people. I knew Bernadine Dohrn when she put a bomb in a windowsill of Park Police Station and killed one officer and blinded another. She was getting a federal paycheck at the time working under a false name in some Legal Services for Criminals bogus NGO.

    I knew those Prison Law Project witches.

    The author is telling the truth. The Stenders Charles Garry, they did exactly what the author describes. It wasn’t just jews. Quakers were heavily involved as well.

  151. Alden says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    Lots of articles in the Jewish community publications about that in the last 20 years. This time it’s jewish men and Chinese women.

  152. @Muggles

    My slogan for the public right now is : Read Atlas Shrugged.

    So your slogan is legalize all drugs and open the borders?

    You don’t have to subscribe to everything Rand wrote to grasp how prescient she was

    Most of what she wrote was junk and steeped in liberal denial of group differences. Somalia should be a utopia according to her theories.

    Her books belong in the trash.

    • Agree: Dannyboy, Bardon Kaldian
  153. Alden says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    I was right there and I knew all those people. That’s what happened.

  154. Here are a few Ayn Rand quotes

    First her opinion on Southern segregation:

    The policy of the Southern states toward Negroes was and is a shameful contradiction of this country’s basic principles. Racial discrimination, imposed and enforced by law, is so blatantly inexcusable an infringement of individual rights that the racist statutes of the South should have been declared unconstitutional long ago.

    Now let’s see what she had to say about Arabs:

    Their culture is primitive, and they resent Israel because it’s the sole beachhead of modern science and civilization on their continent. When you have civilized men fighting savages, you support the civilized men, no matter who they are.

    Don’t forget that she also made fun of Christianity. Is Rand Paul aware of any of this?

  155. @MarkinLA

    I’m guessing it was Frank Caliendo doing the impersonations. The guy is unmatched:

  156. Let me see if I get this straight. A woman’s among many female liberals rode the political gravy train of liberal post modern and early deconstruction theories got wealthy, got married, got divorced, got married, had children, got famous or prominant among white liberals with money and influence —

    Ohhh and might have been propositioned by some black guys. Black guys who according to hear say rumor and no small number of white women notions of blacks were forced to have relations.

    This story sounds very familiar — ohhh, I know white women playing the black male predator card that same card used as routine for two hundred years of US history. and the just cause for hanging, beating, enslaving, violating due process, fear mongering and abridging every reasonable standard kn own to man —

    the virtue of white womanhood.

    Well shiver me timbers “jungle fever” remains a staple of white fear mongering — I know this kind of play is great for the law enforcement, political and social manipulation gravy train . . . but the number of black men raping white women is less than 0.005% and i am being generous, last time I looked.

    So much for the right cries of taking responsibility for one’s action — when it comes to relations – progressives haven’t made a dent in the black white narrative — its still 1700, where the mixing was so much an issue regarding marriage that they had make laws to prevent it. i guess i shouldn’t be surprised that some author and no small number of commenters haven’t left 1700 British colonial life.

    God save the Queen,

    whose grand children apparently are not so inclined.

  157. @Bardon Kaldian

    If you look at 20 most highly rated sports in the world, you’ll see that whites dominate most sports

    There are many sports in which blacks don’t participate.

    In sports where black have equal access, they tend to outperform other races, sometimes by a lot.

    Sprinting, fighting, basketball, and football are very popular and open to all races in the US, and blacks dominate.

    And even in sports where fewer blacks participate, they do very well. Blacks have won their share of wrestling medals in the Olympics. Blacks have also won in tennis, gymnastics, and soccer(last world cup was won by Afro-French players).

  158. I stand partially corrected. I had forgotten, so didn’t mention, that so much happened in the ten days leading to Carl Hampton’s assassination, and how much was happening at that time.

    I will add that disapproval of Hampton is like King George’s disapproval of those no-good colonists firing at his Red Coats, and Pol Pot’s view of the Vietnamese who kicked him out of Phnom Penh, and Hitler’s view of the Allied Forces, and Geronimo’s view of invaders who killed his family, and General Gapp’s view of the U.S. military who killed HIS family, and Caesar’s view of the Basques… endless list…

    A friend of mine went to high school with Carl Hampton. Carl and my friend were born around 1949 in the area of Houston, Texas. It’s because of my friend that I know a little bit about Carl Hampton. Carl, and my friend, and pretty much everybody in the African American community in Texas in the 1950s were, in fact, patriotic church-going people who cared about their country, communities, and neighbors. Connection to farming was still strong all over the country, so economics didn’t have such harsh effect on the everyday struggle to survive. African Americans fought without hesitation in WW2. People who knew how to farm, and had served in the military, and went to church every single Sunday, and dealt with the cruelty violence costs inconveniences indignities of racism, were the kind of people who raised Carl and my friend. My friend’s grandfather had been a carpenter who built a lot of houses in Texas. I don’t know anything about Carl’s parents. But my friend told me, with no reason to be untruthful or even inaccurate, that Carl was the promising star of his high school. I don’t know remember if he was valedictorian (quite possible), but he was described as a model student and star football player. A leader. Trusted and admired. Not a troublemaker. And the story goes that he enlisted in the U.S. military. And while Carl was away, the African American community was in fact dealing with terrifying brutality of white cops against black everyday people. For one example, walking down the street, my friend was attacked and beaten by Houston police. My friend is dignified, gentle person, an intellectual. He was not a high-school troublemaker either, and I believe him when he says that what he was doing when he was beaten was simply walking down the street. I’m pretty sure this happened in an area of Houston where my friend often was, i.e. where the majority of people were African American. He was not invading a white neighborhood where a lot of people would have been suspicious and afraid of him. White police attacking black people happened pretty much every day. The court’s were corrupt. And to get back to Carl… My friend says everybody was shocked when Carl came back home. He was a different person. His hair was long. Most young men started letting their hair and beards grow in the late 1960s to differentiate themselves from the 1950s-ish thought/behavior-police ubiquity of military crew-cuts. It was a very clear way to protest the Vietnam war. It was a way of expressing grief and rage about the spiritual torture and physical crippling of so many of the good guys, barely men, who returned from Vietnam alive, and so many others who did not return alive. It was also a way of protesting the very rigid, “hawkish,” manichean, stifling era they grew up in. (It’s hard to imagine the zeitgeist of the day, but it bugged a lot of people. Not just Fay and Marvin Stender.) Carl came back from wherever it was he went a different person. You don’t have to dig very deep to find out about the kinds of “activism” so many post-WW2 kids were undertaking. Seemed like literally everybody was politically active. And the main reason for that was the Vietnam war. The assassination of JFK was part of it too. But for about ten solid years, almost every family, definitely every neighborhood, had lost their treasured sons. Some of the finest young guys of the generation were killed, or crippled, or in comas because of this pointless, unjust war. And people were sick of it. You know how we’re all so sick of the harmful, useless media today? Or “the deep state”? In those days we perceived it as “the establishment” that was destroying our lives. Somebody help me here: how would you define what was meant by the term “the establishment” back in the 1960s? It inclulded a U.S. Congress that kept funding wars and kept not representing their constituents. It included cops and WW2 vets who demanded blind obedience from their sons, because WW2 had seemed so justified, and the US seemed so noble. It didn’t include the privately-owned press so much back then; most people believed pretty much everything that was published in newspapers and TV. But back then every single boy was required by law to register to be “drafted” into the military, aka register to be shot at in a jungle thousands of miles away in a concocted false-flag conflict (though almost nobody knew it was false-flag nonsense at the time). These fine young men, like Carl Hampton, truly loved and honored the United States. Until they saw what was actually happening in Vietnam and Cambodia. And came back home. And (very understandably in my opinion) became politically active — consistent with their integrity-based souls. Thousands of guys did that. This is what boomers are remembering when they wonder why “nobody is politically active anymore.” I guess we thought 20-somethings would always be out on the streets, righting wrongs, feeding homeless, stopping wars, being free.

    Here’s a good report about Carl Hampton’s last days:
    http://www.itsabouttimebpp.com/Chapter_History/Police_Assassination_of_Carl_Hampton.html
    It doesn’t report anything about who he was before he left Houston as a teenager. Before he woke up.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    , @Alden
    , @anon_231
  159. Bookish1 says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Blacks are not better in sports than whites. The truth is when blacks enter a sport in certain numbers the rules change to fit their character which is a burst of power without strict, refined rules to inhibit them. For instance in basketball years ago before blacks entered the sport in numbers there was a rule that if you dribbled higher than your waist while your feet were in motion it was traveling. Now they dribble all the way up to their shoulders when their feet are in motion. Another rule was called palming the ball. If you rolled the ball with your palm while turning a corner it was a violation of rules. It was a difficult thing to learn to dribble moving sideways and took a lot of practice to do it right. Many others rules like that made basketball a difficult sport to learn. All those rules are gone now. Blacks dont like intricate, refined rules because it inhibits their power burst. The rules changed to fit their character of playing.

    • Replies: @Pincher Martin
  160. @Bookish1

    Oh for Christ’s sakes. Give me a break.

    In any sport which requires foot speed and/or quickness, from basketball to sprinting, blacks have an obvious advantage. At any position in any sport – say, cornerback in the NFL or point guard in the NBA – which requires speed and/or quickness, they have an advantage.

    For instance in basketball years ago before blacks entered the sport in numbers there was a rule that if you dribbled higher than your waist while your feet were in motion it was traveling. Now they dribble all the way up to their shoulders when their feet are in motion. Another rule was called palming the ball. If you rolled the ball with your palm while turning a corner it was a violation of rules. It was a difficult thing to learn to dribble moving sideways and took a lot of practice to do it right. Many others rules like that made basketball a difficult sport to learn. All those rules are gone now. Blacks dont like intricate, refined rules because it inhibits their power burst. The rules changed to fit their character of playing.

    Complete horseshit.

    • Replies: @Neil Templeton
  161. Incredible article and I wish my father were still alive. He was a warden and commissioner in California from the late 50s to 80s. I found his stories, such as this, fascinating. Just to add another depressing story, I remember him once mentioning the name of a well-known Jewish attorney who defended Black Panthers. The attorney told them he couldn’t help them anymore. My dad said the attorney received a call to immediately come home. Some Panthers held his naked wife down on the bed, then “asked” him to reconsider. I remember dad just shook his head, actually feeling sad for the guy. My father was one never to be fooled by these violent “revolutionaries.” As a former ghetto cop he knew how they were on the street in real life.

  162. MarkinLA says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    So you are saying that some cops are psychotic assholes even those who aren’t some times are assholes and sometimes fuck-up. Yeah, they do that to whites (especially poor whites) too? Good thing you told me, I never knew.

  163. Hibernian says:
    @Anonymous

    It’s common for Russian Jews to have Russian given names like Boris or Ivan.

  164. Bookish1 says:

    Also to be considered is the MSM that makes heroes out of blacks when they score. I noticed that when a black hit a homerun in the world series the media focused on him like he was a god. When a white hit a homerun it wasn’t played up nearly as much. TV programs nearly always show a white guy to be a low life criminal and blacks to be law abiding citizens with a black male detective with his white female partner usually chasing a white but a white that is obviously European descent and never with a trace of a possible jewish look. That sort of thing has been going on for many years now. This whole system is designed to elevate blacks and minorities and to put whites down.

  165. @Alden

    I wasn’t right there, but I knew people who knew those people. For several years, I used to talk almost every day with somebody whose mother was one of Fay Stender’s closest friends. I think Fay taught him to play the piano when he was very small. He told me that was one of the ways Fay enormously helped him and his mother when and (or) after his father died. Fay helped his mother raise him. He said Fay could play all of some of the most challenging works of classical-piano perfectly, from memory. Their mothers spent a lot of time together, so he was often at Fay’s house. He said he and Fay’s kids would sometimes watch FBI agents sitting in cars on the street outside Fay’s house. (The FBI really does do stuff like that.) (And how would you like to have that happen to you?) His parents were secular, non-practicing Jewish; he was not a devotee of any form of Judaism and didn’t practice any religion. Other than working the way Americans tend to work. (Hard.) As you know, a lot of European Americans were wholeheartedly in favor of the civil rights movement — all over the country. Actively. African Americans, Mexican Americans, Japanese Americans, Filipino Americans, Jewish Americans, and TONS of European Americans were REALLY sick of systemic injustices against non-whites. Of politically-active blacks being accused and convicted of crimes they didn’t commit. For a very long time, as you know, African Americans were prohibited from pretty much everything but sports and entertainment. They were excluded from major-league baseball teams, even when athletes like Satchel Paige (and many others) could out-pitch and out-play any major-league white pitcher. And on the rare occasions an African American got a role in a movie, it was almost almost always one for an illiterate, one-dimensional Steppin Fetchit stereotype. These are facts. There were LOTS AND LOTS of Euro-Americans who wanted to do what they could do to stop this nonsense. Some knew and worked with the Stenders. One who comes to mind was a guy named Skip (aka Franklin) Glen. PRE-anti-war-era he was: high-school valedictorian, star athlete, scholarship recipient for undergrad at Stanford, law school at Boalt/Berkeley, more law school in the Marine Corps, U.S. Military attorney in Vietnam in the 1960s… Beloved. Respected. Immensely kind. Impeccable integrity. Goes to Vietnam. See the reality of what’s going on there. Returns home to join thousands and thousands of people who were actively opposing the war, literally in the streets. (By the way, years later, Ben Bradlee, Jr., wrote a book called The Ambush Murders about one of Skip’s cases. And if you want an example of a somebody with qualities this Fay Stender piece hurls at “the Jews,” take a look at the WASPiest possible WASP Ben Bradlee, Sr. and
    his thoroughly WASPy family.) Had Skip not inexplicably dropped dead at the age of 39, he’d probably be famous now. I call these people, that you, Alden, and I knew, BLEEDING-HEART CONSERVATIVES. No one was a more devoted patriot and citizen than Skip Glen. Worked hard and honorably, in every way he believed he could. Devoted and faithful husband, even while overseas. Raised hard-working, honorable kids. Served as an officer in the military. Deserved the scholarships and awards he worked so hard for. Is this a description of a “conservative” or a “liberal”? I ask that question to help point out the uselessness of trying to fit everyone and everything into those imaginary either/or slots. Reality is complicated. Hence my term: bleeding-heart conservatives, i.e. people who live conservative lifestyles while actively living up to their civic duties and responsibilities, including working for liberty and justice for all. But, as a legal representative of the US military, Skip Glen refused to join the US government in the diabolical act of betraying people who wholeheartedly trusted the representatives they’d elected. When Fay was shot, Skip, and people like Leonard Wineglass, and many others — not all Jewish as you must know if you were there taking part in what was going on back then — Skip and others didn’t know if they were targeted to be shot too. Some of them, including Skip, booked hotel rooms (in L.A. near LAX I think) together for safety until they felt safe enough to go home. It was a different time. Remember? Skip was one of thousands of guys who went through the transition — from completely believing in the rightness of whatever the US said should be done in and to Vietnam, to first being completely enraged with the US government, and then, as fierce loyalists to the US Constitution, taking full advantage of the 1st Amendment in order to get the US out of that war. And save a lot of lives.
    Thousands of young people all over the country, and in Europe and Australia, and elsewhere, were very politically active in those days. It can be hard to imagine, if not remember, what life was like back then. The country has changed. The zeitgeist has changed. Maybe because of what people you knew back then did? Nobody wants to be enslaved. Nobody ever will. Hence endless political activism. (P.S. Skip Glen’s next case was going to be the war hero Geronimo Pratt — another one of the thousands who come to actively oppose the Vietnam war after serving there. But he died before he could start.) Alden, can you take a few minutes to explain what it was like for you to witness the changes that happened in the East Bay? The lifestyles of the European Americans. And those of African Americans. Do you disagree that African Americans were unfairly prohibited from their natural rights? If not, what would have been a better way to get justice? Should Euro-Africans whose lives, businesses, and homes are being destroyed by a racist system fight back? How? Gently? Forcefully? With or without mistakes? Whatever it takes? And where are we now, here in America, post-civil-rights movement? Can injustices that are happening to whites be stopped? Should they be?

    • Replies: @Neil Templeton
    , @Alden
  166. @Alden

    Are wonderful, deep water ports particularly susceptible to corruption? If so, why?

    • Replies: @Alden
  167. @Bardon Kaldian

    If Euro-Americans had not been prone to decadence, excess, idiotic self-ruination themselves, no amount of Jewish activism would have mattered.

    Oh come now. For sure, The Jews could not have done it by themselves. Without the help of the WASP elite – plus the Anglo individualism which makes it impossible for a tribe to psychologically defend itself against another tribe- we gentile whites would still have secure national borders
    But that does not mean that Organized Jewry hasn’t played a major determinative role in our
    crisis. Meanwhile in europe every Jewish organization and Jewish money is working for open borders and telling nationals that they have to go global. One way we white gentiles have improved in the last generation is that The Jews are increasingly recognized as the would be destroyers of Euro nation states and communities = an old Euro gentile commonsensical recognition which was brainwashed out of us during the second World War by Anglo and philosemetic elites. Your argument belies that perhaps history making re- recognition. Your argument is a regression to the philosemite infantilism I grew up with and internalized in some of our better educational institutions. Give it up. Or are you Jewish?

  168. @Issar

    Good chutzpah. Historically it has often been your undoing. Keep it up.

    • Agree: Dannyboy
  169. @Pincher Martin

    Maybe the rules didn’t change, but interpretation sure did. Palming is a right, traveling is to Miami.

    • Replies: @Pincher Martin
  170. @Alden

    Is that a typo or a joke? In the first 10 years he remade ‘american folk music. That is why he was accused by folkies of betraying it or destroying it.

    • Replies: @Alden
  171. @Dannyboy

    Yes, I’ve come to agree, with astonishment and enormous reluctance, that a conscious effort is under way, and has been for a few decades, to get US citizens to not understand that the creation AND implementation of the US Constitution was one of the most beneficial social achievements in human history. It’s not just a rewriting of history (including texts used for “English” lessons) in school text books; it’s also media and entertainment. It’s a conscious effort to recreate the country’s identity and replace its European legacy and future, even if they have no idea what they’re trying to replace it with. “A multi-cultural culture.” Probably to hell in a row-boat. People aren’t going like living in un-cohesive cities and communities. I have hope that truthful information will always be available and that people will keep reading all their lives, and will figure out the lies we’re talking about. That’s quite possible. It seems to be emanating at least partially if not entirely from the U.N. But not from an exclusive all-powerful club of “the Jews.” Sorry! Tons of WASPS and non-Jews are devoted promoters of this propaganda campaign too. How can whites with too much shame be healed? Practical, specific ways. How can we forgive each other? How can we create something better? Taking reality into consideration. I don’t think more division and vitriol is going to help. If we have a big bloody war, guess who wins? Banks and gun-makers, as always. Not us.

    I think there are a lot of documents that show that the men who created the US Constitution, and the foundation of the country, were as “idealistic” as I am. (And I hope reality never wears down my faith.) When they signed their names to “All men are created equal,” what were they thinking? It’s hard for me to believe that they didn’t hope they were lighting a fuse. The Statue of Liberty. Another great, great achievement by white men. Idealistic as can be. I’m pretty sure European men since about the 1600s have done more to help other human beings than any other, ever. Lots of fighting and damage too. A very wide Bell curve, anyway.

    Prince Hall Freemasons.
    Sally Hemmings, whose help I believe Jefferson said he could not run his business without.
    Jefferson, and his businesses and farm, and his illegitimate children, were in a predicament modern consciousness can’t comprehend. The predicament was a result of a rigid, unopposable belief system. And I’m not a man, so I don’t know what it’s like to need sex, but … well, we know Jefferson adored his first wife… and she died when they both were still quite young. And there he is living on a farm. I’m not sure how far from town. But what with rigging up horses and dealing with weather and so forth, and all the work that needed to be done every day on the farm, trips to town probably didn’t happen too often. Can he go to town and court single young ladies? Can he request friends and acquaintances in other colonies (which were sparsely populated) to send him a new wife? I think for practical reasons, but also emotional reasons, he thought of his family as his and Martha’s daughters. and the other people who lived on his farm. Yes, Sally Hemmings was taken, as property, for Jefferson’s normal, biological need for sex. She had no say in the matter, right? But I’m sure they didn’t act like robots. They talked every day. He knew Sally Hemmings’ parents. I don’t think Jefferson treated his slaves the way Frederick Douglass was treated. And wasn’t the first slave owner in the “New World” African? Wouldn’t surprise me if TJ was the kind of guy who kept his emotions to himself, even with his wife Martha. But I think there are historical documents that show that when his illegitimate children grew up, and his paternity became obvious and scandalous, he didn’t do what modern people would do, but he did do more than what most of his contemporaries would have done, namely just send his illegitimate kids far away and nothing more. He reportedly helped ensure his illegitimate kids were able to live as free non-slaves, and live the rest of their lives safely and in high-social standing. I think Sally Hemmings stayed with him on the farm until he died, didn’t she? His society would not have permitted him to use the courts/clergy to free and marry a slave. I’m pretty sure what I’m typing is true. People form emotional bonds. Have you ever worked in a small company? People do horrible, cruel things to each other. And people also care about each other and do things that are kind and loving and selfless. People form bonds with each other when they work together with a common goal. I just don’t think most of the white men who operated farms were sociopathic monsters and had no affection and concern for the people they lived with, died with, birthed with, danced with, farmed with, built with, and received devotion from. And John Adams stood out from other people of the day as much more of a humanitarian than most. Yes, they owned slaves. They spent a lot of time thinking and arguing about God-given, natural rights of human beings. Didn’t Jefferson take the courageous risk of vocally and on-public-record opposing slavery? I think he did but can’t cite. The system that slaves and slave owners depended on had not yet been destroyed and replaced. (Did you know slavery was not illegal in Nigeria until the 1970s? I think that’s true.) (Did you know Pythagoras was enslaved for part of his life?) Now, the slavery we’re guilty of is wearing clothes that are made in sweat shops, and using all kinds of products, produced by slaves, and eating food that’s farmed by people with few if any rights.

    Victor Hugo, French white guy with a bottomless depth of compassion for and understanding of the human soul and its potential.

    Granville Sharpe, abolitionist from England, 1700s or so. Other European and EuroAmerican abolitionists.

    Tons of white guys who have worked hard for liberty and justice for all. More than any other group, for whatever reason.

    Usually I’m proud of my European ancestry and “cousins.” I’m not proud when someone of European descent firehoses every single member of a perceived foreign community as incorrigible criminals, since it isn’t and can’t be true, and it’s so lacking in creativity and possibility, and it’s so self-serving. It’s no different from the thinking that caused the 100 years war, and thousands of other wars, where people with power of the pulpit keep voiceless people eternally fighting with each other.

    Have you had friends of different backgrounds and ancestries?

    But if I were to give up hope and idealism, and think maybe mobbing is as embedded in human behavior as dreaming, then I’d have to wonder if maybe we will always gang together and pick on other gangs. If that’s true, then let’s talk frankly about the realities of that. Are you left with any hope if that’s the reality?? What’s the rest of human history going to be like if that’s a fact?

  172. @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    Injustice to whites should continue until they wake from their drunken stupor. And not before.

    • Troll: Alden
    • Replies: @Alden
  173. Alden says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    Paragraphs needed. I know what Stender and the rest of the Jew commie lawyers and their black stormtroopers did.

    I don’t read badly written posts with no comments. Stender and Prison Law Project witches hated me and did their best to destroy me because I sent black rapists to state prison for maximum teens.

    Don’t bother with your liberal nonsense. Those Jew commie attorneys and their black stormtrooper clients were destructive and evil. Blacks destroyed Oakland.

  174. @Issar

    ! Great comments! And funny. And informed. And wise. I hope you do find time to comment on all this again; what you would say would dig into the complexities and realities and grays and conundrums and paradoxes of it all. (Be careful about mentioning Torquemada around here. Might give the wrong people some bad ideas. :o) ) I didn’t know Fay, but I knew two people who knew her. And I grew up and spent most of my life in California and knew a lot of people like her. I was about 20 years younger, but part of the zeitgeist of that whole era. I very naively believed poverty was being eliminated. In the 1980s, I remember being unable to comprehend the increase in homelessness. It was a new word: “homeless.” We thought Reagan had caused it. He didn’t help, but people like me (back then) thought poverty could be solved by giving just barely, barely enough tax money to survive to poor people for a few generations. Dumb idea didn’t seem dumb in the 1960s. We thought we were electing people who would get the US out of foreign wars. We thought people of every background were going to be undivided (and that has actually happened in a few places I know of, but not very many). We thought men and women were going to all work together, equally, side by side, at home and away from home. I think it must have been one of history’s most well-intentioned times. Fay’s is one of the most interesting stories of them all. And yeah, Stephen Bingham’s crucial role was left out of the article above. Everybody had heard of Stephen Bingham at the time; not so many had heard of Fay Stender. I wonder why that was. And I think there’s a lot more to the story behind the man who shot her. Seems more like a co-intel-pro job than a BP job. Who knows. Anybody know? I’d like to know. Have been wondering for a long time. Everybody has stories from those days. The hitch-hiking and rock concerts and drugs. Lots of very weird, horrible stuff like that, that I don’t miss at all. Too bad drugs are not gone yet. Glad the bad parts of those days are over. But people seem so confused now. Picking the wrong fights. Not picking the right fights. Not getting together and working together and still falling for all the dumb divide-and-conquer tricks…

    • Replies: @schrub
  175. @Alden

    If you put criminals in jail and thereby protected innocent people, I thank you.

    • LOL: Alden
  176. @Neil Templeton

    Maybe the rules didn’t change, but interpretation sure did. Palming is a right, traveling is to Miami.

    It wasn’t done to give blacks an advantage. Nor has it provided blacks an advantage, since white players are perfectly capable of palming the ball.

  177. Alden says:
    @Neil Templeton

    Global ports are probably susceptible to corruption. But Seattle San Diego and LA San Pedro stayed normal when San Francisco went insane and black crime went out of control,

    What happened the town Berkeley became infested with communists and Jews in the 1930s. WW2 brought the Black Plague to work in war industry Oakland became a crime ridden black ghetto. So did parts of San Francisco

    Then Lyndon Johnson’s war on poverty gave billions in federal grants to Jewish communist radicals to organize blacks into a revolution

    The commie liberals must have targeted the Bay Area because of the Berkeley and San Francisco White communists and the solidly black criminal town of Oakland.

    The Jewish radical carpetbaggers grabbed the Johnson Nixon Carter federal money and just invaded the Bay Area law enforcement and criminal courts.

    Although they were solid middle class, they were also what were called red diaper babies. Their parents were 1930s Jewish communists. Their grandparents were usually 1900 Russian Jew communist immigrants.

    The new pro criminal anti police anti victim of crime district attorney of San Francisco isChesa Boudin. He’s a 4th generation Jewish communist anti White activist.

    He’s not the first pro crime San Francisco district attorney. Terence Hallinan 1996 to 2004 was another. He was a third generation communist. Within a week he’d fired most of the experienced prosecutors and hired other liberals.

    When police find evidence and put together a good case, a prosecutor has to file charges. Hallinan’s liberal prosecutors just seldom filed charges. So there was a high crime rate when Hallinan was district attorney

    Boudin’s reign will be worse. He’s one of the many pro black and illegal alien criminal district attorneys George Soros is funding in many American counties.

    Soros’ district attorneys won’t just refuse to prosecute crime in their counties. They will join the state and national district attorney associations. Those associations, along with police and sheriff associations lobby for anti crime laws at the state and national level.

    It was the DAs associations that pushed 3 strikes you’re out, use a gun go to jail, and all the victim’s rights laws. For instance in the sentencing hearing used to be just the defense attorney speaking about how the criminal is just a poor pathetic stupid black victim or racism and slavery and shouldn’t go to prison.

    Once the DA police and anti crime groups got victim’s rights laws through the legislatures, then the victim could also speak at the sentencing hearing and the judge could be persuaded to give the criminal the sentence he deserved.

    So you can see that once these Soros DAs take over the state and national DAs associations the laws will be changed to be even more favorable to criminals than they are now.

    The new DA has promised not to prosecute non violent crimes. That means he won’t prosecute burglaries and a lot of theft. He might stretch non violence to was the victim hurt or not. If 3 criminals point guns at a robbery victim and he gives them his car keys and money or the contents of the cash register Boudin’s office might consider that non violent.

    Well, San Franciscan’s voted for him. They’ll get what they deserve.

  178. Alden says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    If you want people to read your posts use paragraphs and try to stick with the topic instead of just pasting in your Africans American History term paper.

  179. @Alden

    It could help if you would document your experiences and publish them here or somewhere. So much people don’t know.Even those of us who were watching from the sidelines like me. How will people of the future know if nobody reports? And all the many people, old folks now, like the Stenders and the Black Panthers, can handle it. They need to know the truth even if they can’t.

    • Replies: @Alden
  180. @Priss Factor

    Blacks are very visible in basketball & American football, as in the field and track athletics. They virtually dominate these sports. They are present in soccer, but not dominant. In all other 200 sports they’re barely present.

    In tennis, male, which is the no1. world individual sport- nothing.

    In volleyball, handball, water polo,… nothing.

    In various types of fighting, their presence has either diminished (boxing, with entrance of EE boxers) or they truly are present, but the best are European & white American fighters (MMA).

    Hockey- nothing.

    Everything with water & snow & air- nothing.

    Almost everything with machines- nothing.

    Everything else- almost zero. Just check & you can see for various individual sports:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sports

    • Agree: Dannyboy
  181. @Dannyboy

    This is interesting… Benjamin Banneker, Thomas Jefferson, slavery in America in the late 18th century… https://www.biography.com/scientist/benjamin-banneker

  182. Alden says:
    @Neil Templeton

    Sorry, I hit the wrong word I meant agree, not troll

  183. Alden says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    It’s neither a typo nor a joke.

    Long before Robert Zimmerman was a singer I read 2 books. One was The Anthology Of American Folk Music. The other was America Sings, an anthology of American Music and Poetry.

    I read them for the pictures of square dancers, Mississippi riverboats and log cabins. I read them for the 2 page historical tales of the settlement if America by farmers and working men.

    I also read the names and lyrics of the songs. John Henry, Erie Canal Copper Kettle Rally Round the Bonnie Blue Flag Barbara Allen and the others. Also first time I heard of the Whiskey Rebellion was in one of those books Copper Kettle was partially about the Whiskey Rebellion.

    So when Joan Baez and Robert Zimmerman and others began singing those songs I recognized them from those books published before they were born.

    Most of their songs, especially in the first years had been written and sung 100, 200, even 3 and 400 years ago in Europe

    That’s what I meant.

    Zimmerman’s songs were standard American Folk music written and sung by Americans long before he was born.

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  184. @Priss Factor

    Little Croatia almost beat them. If Europe could assemble a white team from multiple countries as France did with their African “French” players, then they would probably win.

    • Agree: Dannyboy
  185. schrub says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    Please consider using more paragraphs to make your comments easier to read.

  186. anarchyst says:
    @Anonymous

    Your comment:

    “Someone or something was looking out for Dylan, it does seem sometimes.”

    The answer is easy. Zimmerman is a JEW. Jews look out for each other to the nth degree.

    Zimmerman (Dylan) sounds like a cat in heat and has NO talent, never has never will.

    • Replies: @FLgeezer
  187. @Issar

    “The deaths were thanks to the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) Bingham weirdo who brought Jackson the gun.”

    Yeah, let’s look at how that weirdo ended up where he did.

    From a story in the New London Day, by (((Bernard Gavzer))) from 1971:

    “Steve [Bingham] joined the Yale young Democrats. He served on the Student Advisory Board. And, as a senior, he was the executive editor of the Yale Daily News. Life might have remained tranquil and orderly except for the appearance of (((Allard Lowenstein))) a peripatetic dynamo of vast energy and enthusiasm.”

    Last August 1st [1970] Steve [Bingham] joined a law firm, actually a law collective, then known as (((Franck, Hill, Stender, Ziegler and Hendon))).

    “A man who has known three generations of Binghams remarks, with compassion: ‘There is a certain naivete about all the Binghams.’”

    In other words, Bingham was just the sort of foolish WASP who is and has been easily influenced and co-opted by conniving/psychotic Jewry. After having been radicalized by the Jew and then inducted into a largely Jewish counter-culture “law collective,” it’s not surprising that the witless goy ended up as a delivery man for the even more witless radical blacks.

    As usual, for every stone pulled up, out crawls a Jew. But in the end, of c0urse, when all the havoc had been wrought by these Jews, they snuck away from the mess they had created and began to move in force into overt Judeotribalist neoconservatism. “Time to stop worrying about these ungrateful schwartzes, now that we have overthrown the WASPs, and focus on questions like why Poland isn’t reverential about the Warsaw Ghetto!”

    • Agree: Dannyboy
    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  188. Dannyboy says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    Blah Blah Blah Blah…Typical Leftist Blizzard of Bullshit.

    Once again, The Founding Fathers were racist, sexist, white supremacists, most of whom would have likely favored the Confederate cause.

    The vast majority of the Left have already let the mask slip and expressed their true hatred for white America and it’s European Christian roots. You should probably pick a side.

    • Agree: Alden
  189. Dannyboy says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    Usually I’m proud of my European ancestry and “cousins.” I’m not proud when someone of European descent firehoses every single member of a perceived foreign community as incorrigible criminals, since it isn’t and can’t be true, and it’s so lacking in creativity and possibility, and it’s so self-serving.

    Well hey, I got an idea! How about you and Corvinus and EliteComm get together and move yourselves to a majority black city. Lots of nice cheap housing there. Send your your brats to “school” with those long suffering and noble African-Americans.

    You boys really need to get reacquainted with your beloved pets. Full immersion is the only way to go.

    • Agree: Alden
  190. @donvonburg

    White society understood blacks and kept their pathologies under control in America until the “civil rights era”

    I’d be interested to know what you’re referring to by their pathologies.
    I’m not inclined to label a race of people as having pathologies but perhaps their penchant for ending up in criminality was a result of the centuries of slavery that their ancestors underwent. The result of slavery has permeated down the bloodline and entered into the subconscious of the descendents we know today and is coming out in variety of negative manifestations.

    Black people I think are not leaders though they are followers and have been used over many centuries either by Europeans or Arabs mainly. They work better though when they are controlled by something like Christianity or Islam or some strong conservative ideology but left to their own devices yeah it can be bad for them and others.

  191. MarkinLA says:
    @Oscar Peterson

    When I used to also view FrontPageMagazine, Horowitz had a few stories about his radical days. In one, he was at a meeting with the Panthers and other white radicals. Supposedly, Tom Hayden came up with some plan for violence and was angling to find somebody who might take it up. One of the Panthers said, “Yeah Tom, get a nigger to pull the trigger”.

  192. The rare story of a subversive Jew that actually has a happy ending.

    • Agree: Dannyboy
  193. @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    I think there are a lot of documents that show that the men who created the US Constitution, and the foundation of the country, were as “idealistic” as I am. (And I hope reality never wears down my faith.) When they signed their names to “All men are created equal,” what were they thinking?

    That was the declaration of independence, not the constitution.

    You have only been given the establishment view of Jefferson which is egalitarian. Both liberals and conservatives try to hide how politically incorrect he was:
    http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch15s28.html

    Tons of white guys who have worked hard for liberty and justice for all. More than any other group, for whatever reason.

    The global situation isn’t that simple as liberty and justice for all. The West pushed to end White rule in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe in the name of liberty and justice. Well White farmers were brutally killed and then a Black hero of the left named Mugabe took over and destroyed the economy. Where was the justice for the farmers? The entire Western media just looked the other way and *hoped and wished* Mugabe wouldn’t be so bad.

    All evidence suggests that there are differences between Africans and Europeans that go beyond superficial features. Some are undisputed like lactase persistence but aren’t discussed in the media to maintain the narrative.

    What you need to realize is that your sense of idealism runs into problems because of racial differences, not because you are trying to do the right thing.

    Many of us are ex-liberals that were not happy to leave liberalism. I was never converted by some nebulous right that lurks on the internet. I started to lose my faith after a friend showed me how the school he worked at was falsifying grades. The corruption within liberal institutions is beyond what you might imagine, and in their minds it is all “doing the right thing” and we are the bad people. Why have they stooped so low to falsify grades? Do they really believe in equality?

  194. Anonymous[404] • Disclaimer says:
    @Alden

    QUOTE: Were [Fay] still alive she’d be campaigning … anti vaccine …

    WRONG. Worshipers of the modern “Leftist” cult orchestrated by Big Glob are stridently PRO-vaccination, as they are PRO any and all government compulsion. The less valuable and the more dangerous the vaccination, the more the modern worshiper is in favor of draconian enforcement.

    Of course, there are always big $$$ to be made from vaccines. This has resulted in an unholy alliance of Big Pharma and “progressive” lobbyists, to say nothing of decades of vaccine propaganda in the school system.

    Big Pharma has managed to push through numerous regulatory changes to ensure that (1) many vaccines are only available from a single monopoly provider; and (2) victims of mass vaccination – a small percentage of patients will CERTAINLY wind up with major brain damage and other side effects – are boxed in by a highly restrictive legal regime that limits damages.

    This is not to say that all vaccinations are noxious. Vaccinations fall on a wide spectrum of usefulness and risk. COMBINING vaccinations presents higher overall risk than separate vaccinations because the patient is exposed to a higher dose at once.

    Note that the vaccination fanatics have recently come up with a new rationale for FORCED vaccination: Joe Sixpack should get vaccinated so that HIS LAYABOUT NEIGHBOR won’t catch the targeted infection without having to get vaccinated himself.

    • Replies: @Alden
  195. Alden says:
    @Anonymous

    When your unvaccinated kids get polio diphtheria and Scarlett fever tell me how you feel about it .

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  196. Alden says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    Why should I do anything a White hating liberal like you wants? You hate me because I’m White.

  197. Alden says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    Without paragraphs no one’s going to read your African American Studies term paper. Wasted effort. We’ve heard the same White hating liberal propaganda all our lives.

  198. Anonymous[352] • Disclaimer says:
    @Staudegger

    What does “JEM” mean?

    This may be unfair, but a usually reliable tell that a website is run by a lunatic is the use of private jargon, acronyms, and word-meanings known only to the author.

    • Replies: @Staudegger
  199. Gary5775 says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    You lost a lot of credibility when you brought up Sally Hemmings in your rambling tany. As I understand it, there is evidence that she has some Jefferson family DNA, but nobody has ever established that Thomas Jefferson sired children with her or even ever had sex with her. Instead, it is more likely that one of his Jefferson’s relatives, such as his brother, had the sexual relations with Hemmings.

    I also question your implicit claim that white men essentially had black sex slaves in the 1700s and early 1800s. I doubt that this was ever as common as liberals claim it was. To the extent that that sexual relations occurred, I would bet that the vast, vast majority of the time, the black women were willing participants. But I doubt that it ever happened that often. Anecdotally I can tell you that I do not know many white men who are even attracted to black women today. I would imagine that black women were viewed even more negatively centuries ago

    • Replies: @Michael888
  200. FLgeezer says:
    @anarchyst

    >has NO talent, never will.

    Ditto Dustin Hoffman.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  201. @Anonymous

    Read the glossary.
    https://theapolloniantransmission.com/a-glossary-of-terms/
    JEM = Jewish Esoteric Moralization. It’s a symbolic strategy Jews use in their art (movies, novels, TV shows, etc) to moralize their race and demoralize Whites. It’s the reason why Hollywood has been so successful at subverting America. I originally thought the author’s thoughts were a bit out there, but a close look at Jewish media content shows that he’s right about a lot of what he says.

  202. @Gary5775

    From what I’ve read, Jefferson’s father-in-law sired Sally Hemmings, who was Jefferson’s wife’s half- sister, as well as her servant and slave. She was supposedly 3/4 white and was often confused with Martha, his wife. After Martha died, Sally became Jefferson’s lover. Given the times, women were hard to come by in certain colonial locales.
    While many have the belief that most mixed Blacks were the result of “slave rape”, the vast majority appear to have resulted from unions of immigrant Irish women and Blacks in the late 1800s. The Black men had higher status and incomes than immigrant Irish men at the time.

    • LOL: Alden
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Gary5775
  203. While many have the belief that most mixed Blacks were the result of “slave rape”, the vast majority appear to have resulted from unions of immigrant Irish women and Blacks in the late 1800s. The Black men had higher status and incomes than immigrant Irish men at the time.

    Not true. A recent study of African American genes showed that interracial mixing declined after the Civil War and that most of the white ancestry in African Americans entered their gene pool in the antebellum period when blacks were still enslaved.

  204. anon_231 says:
    @DesperatelyCallingJefferson

    poor Carl

    i’ll think of him the next time I hear that another coal-burner’s been killed or another white woman’s been raped – if they even report that any more

  205. @Alden

    I am talking abut Dylan’s = or, if you will, Zimmerman’s – music and not Bayez’s From Dylan’s second Album – The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan – practically all of it was original lyrics By 1964 the folkie Pete Seeger was trying to cut Dylan’s mike at the Folk Festival because he considered Dylan anti folk. Dylan had a different and new idea of what folk was

    • Replies: @Alden
  206. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Michael888

    The Irish immigrant women were in the northern cities. The black men were in the rural south, hundreds of miles apart. So how did they get together?

    I assume you’re one of those southern confederate heritage people who deny the fact that it was black women and White men who made the mulatto quadroon and octoroon population explode.

    • Replies: @Dannyboy
  207. Gary5775 says:
    @Michael888

    Show me one credible source which proves that Thomas Jefferson was Sally Hemmings’ lover. I certainly have not seen one. All I have read is that she had some Jefferson family DNA, but it wasn’t necessary that of Thomas Jefferson. The Left just wants to crap all over the white “Founding Fathers” of the USA, so they have been pushing this story about Jefferson having a black slave as a lover.

    • Replies: @Alden
  208. Dannyboy says:
    @Anon

    I’ve got news for you, genius, Union troops raped boatloads of slaves as well as white women while on their glorious crusade to “stamp out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored”. Mr Sherman’s “bummers” were especially active in that regard.

    In-between their other favorite pastimes, namely looting and burning…lol

  209. Alden says:
    @Dannyboy

    You must not have read my post. It wasn’t about union soldiers and southern women.

    It was about immigrant Irish women who lived hundreds of miles away from black men.

    You can’t blame 240 years of happy miscegenation between southern White men and black women on a few years of union soldiers and southern black women.

    Confederate heritage is one thing, but southerners should admit the facts that were it not for southern White men, there’d be far far fewer blacks around today. Think of almost White Eric Holder, Cory Booker, Jesse Jackson and that Ford political family in Tennessee.

    Ever seen Jesse Jackson? I have. His features are Africans but his skin is the color of a lemon.
    White men and black women produced the 40 million criminal useless Black Plague.

    You can’t blame it on Irish immigrant women hundreds of miles from blacks. Nor can you blame it on a couple years of union soldiers. It’s 240 years of joyful miscegenation between White men and primitive Africans. Gross and disgusting

    • Replies: @Dannyboy
    , @Hibernian
  210. Alden says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    Original lyrics all right; original lyrics and music written 100 years before Zimmerman was born.

    I heard Zimmerman’s croaking and recognized the lyrics.

  211. Dannyboy says:
    @Alden

    I was replying to Anon’s comment, not yours.

    • Replies: @Alden
  212. Dannyboy says:

    Confederate heritage is one thing, but southerners should admit the facts that were it not for southern White men, there’d be far far fewer blacks around today.

    Sounds familiar…lol

    I suggest you do some reading here, before you attempt to wash your ancesteral hands of “blacks in the United States”.

    http://slavenorth.com/slavenorth.htm

  213. Alden says:
    @Gary5775

    DNA proves the father or father’s of Heming’s children was a Jefferson male. Jefferson’s daughters by his wife Martha always claimed it was Peter Carr a nephew of Thomas Jefferson.

    But there’s the fact that Sally got pregnant when she was with the Jefferson Family in Paris where only one Jefferson male was in Paris, Thomas. She had six children and one stillborn over 20 years by a White man who created more blacks.

    Whatever, some White Jefferson man was the father of Sally’s children. Given that she was cream, not butterscotch or caramel colored, it’s likely that her great grandfather as well as her known grandfather and father were White men.

    Sally Hemings was the daughter and grand daughter of black women and White men.

    White men and black women together created the blacks of America. Without the White men there wouldn’t be as many of them and the destructive damage they’ve done and will continue doing.

    • Replies: @SurfingUSA
  214. Alden says:
    @Dannyboy

    I responded to your claim that it wasn’t 240 years of miscegenation between black women and White men but a couple years of union soldiers and black women. It was 240 years of miscegenation between black women and White men centuries before The War of Northern Aggression.

    Southern White men were the ancestors of most American blacks. Their animal sex with black women produced the American black population that causes so much crime, public school problems, affirmative action and cost to the taxpayers.

  215. Dannyboy says:

    You can’t blame it on Irish immigrant women hundreds of miles from blacks. Nor can you blame it on a couple years of union soldiers. It’s 240 years of joyful miscegenation between White men and primitive Africans. Gross and disgusting

    Nothing that your folks weren’t doing as well, albeit on a smaller scale. Of course that had much more to do with climate and duration of growing season, than anything else.

    [MORE]

    Despite the Puritan strictures against sexuality (Massachusetts was one of a handful of colonies to punish what later was called “miscegenation”), free whites and black slaves had sex under a range of circumstances, and a population of mulattos began to grow. By the early 18th century, Connecticut and Massachusetts had to recognize mulattoes as a separate race classification. Exact numbers from colonial times are difficult to pinpoint, but Rhode Island did make a specific census in 1782, which found that, of 3,806 non-whites in the colony, 464 or one-eight were mulattoes. The districts with the highest number of black slaves had the fewest mulattoes, which is consistent with the pattern in the South a century later.

    Strict moral and social pressure rejected any romantic attachments across race lines. Anne Grant wrote that New Yorkers believed nature had drawn a line between the races “which it was in a high degree criminal and disgraceful to pass; they considered a mixture of such distinct races with abhorrence, as a violation of her laws.”[7] Yet it happened. In the case of New England, white women outnumbered white men, while demand for slave laborers meant black adult males in Massachusetts outnumbered black adult females in 1755 by nearly 2 to 1. Instances of co-habitation and even marriage (when and where it could be legally accomplished) between black men and white women are recorded throughout New England and to a lesser extent in the middle colonies. Such activity was not without risk, however: in 1718 a Connecticut man discovered a black man and a white woman together, and in his enraged reaction he castrated the other man. The “Boston News Letter” reported this, approvingly.[8]

    The situation was reversed for rural Vermonters during the 1800s, when the population of white women fell because so many had moved down to the towns to take factory work. Black women, who did not have that option, were still around and were the only other choice for wives. Vermont changed its rules about birth certificates to speed the legal assimilation of mulattoes into the white population. Certificates for first-generation children of interracial marriages were marked “negro;” second generation, “colored;” and third generation “white.” To the average Vermonter, however, even after the third generation they were just “bleached niggers.”

    Neither were the Northern colonial mulattoes exclusively free people. Many were slaves. A sampling of New England runaways showed that one in six were advertised as mulattoes, and the proportion was similar in the middle colonies. The 1780 slave register of Chester County, Pennsylvania, shows mulattoes made up 20% of the total. The “Pennsylvania Chronicle” from 1767-73 advertised 61 fugitives, of whom about 20% had white blood in some degree. In some cases the proportion was so high that the advertisers warned the fugitive slave could pass for white and probably would attempt to do so.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    , @Alden
  216. Kelso says:

    Goyim-hatred, not White hatred

  217. Miro23 says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The same can be said of the US, where Jews are powerful & influential. If Euro-Americans had not been prone to decadence, excess, idiotic self-ruination themselves, no amount of Jewish activism would have mattered.

    An opportunistic infection. The patient has lost his/her immune system.

  218. @Alden

    You can’t blame it on Irish immigrant women hundreds of miles from blacks.

    You are wrong and @Michael888 is correct. The first miscegenation laws in the U.S. were promulgated in Virginia in the 1691, as a result of Irish indentured servants, female, carrying on with African slave males. Maryland followed in 1717.

    https://guides.loc.gov/american-women-law/state-laws
    (click on the tab reading Slavery and Indentured Servants)

    The Virginia law:

    And for prevention of that abominable mixture and spurious issue which hereafter may encrease in this dominion, as well by negroes, mulattoes, and Indians intermarrying with English, or other white women, as by their unlawfull accompanying with one another, Be it enacted by the authoritie aforesaid, and it is hereby enacted, that for the time to come, whatsoever English or other white man or woman being free shall intermarry with a negroe, mulatto, or Indian man or woman bond or free shall within three months after such marriage be banished and removed from this dominion forever. . . .41

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @Anon
  219. Hibernian says:
    @Alden

    There were some Irish immigrants in the South pre-Civil War, particularly in New Orleans. Nonetheless, explaining the racial mixing as a case of Irish women and Black men is ridiculous, by and large. And the timeframe in which Irish soldiers of the Union might have raped, or had consensual sexual relations with, Black women, was a few years only, and likewise is nowhere near an adequate explanation for the racial mixing. Nor, obviously, are the two phenomena in combination anywhere near an adequate explanation. Neoconfederates, don’t use us Hibernians as props for your propaganda!

    • Replies: @Alden
  220. Hibernian says:
    @Dannyboy

    Northern guilt for slavery, which was great, was mainly for acting as the cotton buyers and financial backers behind the slaveocracy, and shipbuilders and owners in connection with the slave trade, and also direct participation in the slave trade.

    Neoconfederates are great at taking a molehill, such as Irish woman/Black man coupling, and calling it a mountain.

  221. Alden says:
    @SurfingUSA

    That law doesn’t say Irish does it?? You lied when you write the law was passed because if Irish slave women. The law doesn’t say Irish women.

    Most American and Caribbean blacks are the descendants of White men having sex with black women. It’s just ridiculous for confederates to deny it. All anyone has to do is look at American blacks to see the truth.

    From Frederick Douglas to Malcolm X to Jessie Jackson to Cory Booker it’s obvious most black leaders are more White than black. Just look at them. Kamala Harris’ very light skinned father is a grandson of a White plantation owner married to a black woman, actually partly black woman with a White father.

    Should have picked your own cotton and if not satisfied with White women should have had sex with the cows and chickens instead of breeding more and more of the Black Plague

    • Replies: @SurfingUSA
  222. Alden says:
    @Hibernian

    I know the Irish coolies were brought in to dig the big shipping canal because blacks were valuable livestock whose lives and health couldn’t be risked.

    I believe the confederates have been brainwashed by all those TV ADs in the last few years showing White women black men couples.

    Confederate men should stop their lies that pre civil war White women copulated with blacks and caused the black population boom. It just turns off anyone who might be sympathetic to preserving confederate monuments and confederate music.

    I’m confederate heritage myself. Several ancestors in the confederate army none that I know of in the union army. They all
    Seem to have left New England for the area around Frankfort Kentucky by 1820. And yes, they owned slaves.

    But the insistence that White men didn’t breed more blacks with black women contributes to lack of sympathy for preserving the confederate heritage.

    • Replies: @Dannyboy
  223. Alden says:
    @Dannyboy

    2 siblings had 23 and me DNA testing. Not a drop of black DNA. Can White southerners say the same after 400 years of living with the Black Plague.?

  224. @Dannyboy

    I’ve got news for you, genius, Union troops raped…

    Pretty flippant address for a follow up that’s completely fouled up, i.e., TOTALLY INACCURATE.

    There is written account from eye witness of color describing local black women coming out to the Union encampments at night night-after-night as the troops moved through different localities to greet and comfort the conquering heroes.

    It’s right here online, too. All it takes is learning a little bit of AMERICAN HISTORY. Just look up the greatest black author of all time and peruse his online publication for his account.

    p.s. the Jews got their puppet negroes to vilify and disavow him for daring to write the truth with his light-skinned off hand, the only one he had left after his sacrifice in uniform for Emancipation.

  225. Dannyboy says:
    @Alden

    Nobody who cares about what the Confederacy fought for wants your sympathy.

    Everyone knows that those Puritan New Englanders would never even think of copulating with niggers, much less actually engage in that sort of behavior. In the rare case that it did happen, it was in all probability those Irish sluts, not pure Anglo women…lol

    People like to talk about the mythology of the “Lost Cause”. I’m afraid if we were to attempt document the entirety of the New England Yankee mythology, it would require an eight volume set.

    • Replies: @Alden
  226. Alden says:

    Deny deny deny all you want, but you can’t deny that we’d have only 5 or 6 percent black population if White men had not indulged themselves with black women. And exactly what did the confederacy fight for? The right to live in cities that are 60, 70 percent black? The right to live in states that are 25% black whose every government job is filled by blacks?

    • Replies: @Dannyboy
  227. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @SurfingUSA

    Had the writers of that law meant Irish indentured servant women they would have written Irish indentured servant women. The writers did however, specifically mention English women.

    No wonder the south lost the war if the strategists thought as you do.

    • Replies: @SurfingUSA
  228. Clearly, we need to do whatever we can to stamp out racism — to encourage more friendly relationships between our fellow white people and our more heavily-melanated brethren.

    It’s a mitzvah!

    Tikkun olam, my friends.

  229. @Bardon Kaldian

    It is always a pleasure to be reacquainted with Polymath-Bardon and his articulate insights. With respect to the Geaux-Tabeaux, he (and others here) may already be acquainted with E. Michael Jones’ excellent historical analyses, specifically The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit: And Its Impact on World History. May we also suggest The Plot Against The Church by “Maurice Pinay”? As a summary states accurately:

    “What gives this book definite, provable worth is that it deals with a magnificent and imposing compilation of documents and sources of undeniable importance and authenticity, which demonstrates with no room for doubt the existence of a great conspiracy, which the traditional enemies of the Church have prepared against Holy Catholic Church, and against the Free World.”

    As for our favorite sub-culture and their obtuse, ongoing, self-disabling politics, the multitudinous corrections which they require include social and public chastisements but never reparations. Most unfortunately, the anti-Christian demographic that helped to foment violence and vandalism as a tool of political intimidation — thanks to LBJ, Alinsky, and, of course, an “over-the-shoulder acknowledgement to … Lucifer” — has succeeded in maintaining not only their poverty and ignorance but also their political enslavement to the leftist agendas.

    Add to all this the continuing Aztec Invasion and perhaps Mr. Derbyshire is correct: we may, in fact, be doomed.

  230. Anonymous[249] • Disclaimer says:
    @Alden

    Alden QUOTE:

    When your unvaccinated kids get polio diphtheria and Scarlett fever tell me how you feel about it.

    Looks like Alden missed this paragraph:

    This is not to say that all vaccinations are noxious. Vaccinations fall on a wide spectrum of usefulness and risk.

    Also:

    COMBINING vaccinations presents higher overall risk than separate vaccinations because the patient is exposed to a higher dose at once.

    Obviously the statement of an anti-vaccination fanatic, such as, e.g. Centers for Disease Control.

    • Replies: @Alden
  231. @Bardon Kaldian

    Unless and until they have absolute power as they did in the Soviet Union, they like to work behind the scenes and under the radar. Check out the video of Barbara Spector in Sweden. Europe and the West needs to repatriate them to Tel Aviv … for their preservation and ours.

  232. Dannyboy says:
    @Alden

    I just posted documented evidence of the existence of hundreds of mulattoes in Massachusetts and Connecticut and Rhode Island in 1792.

    That’s long before the influx of Irish Catholics ( whom the “purebred” virtuous WASP Yankees like to blame pretty much everything on) to those areas.

    So who exactly was engaging in this behavior?

    Listen pal, I’m not arguing that it didn’t happen in greater quantity on the South. Everything pertaining to blacks happened more in the South because there were millions more there. Stands to reason.

    Let’s just not pretend that the current negro problem is exclusively a “Southern” responsibility, because that’s utter nonsense. Especially egregious is the fact that New England busybodies made it their business to overturn the entire racial dynamic in the South not once, but twice. Thanks in large part to Jews like this Stender cunt.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @Alden
  233. Alden says:
    @Anonymous

    Another ignorant internet “researcher” who believes the stories of hysterical rich women with too much time in their hands.

  234. Alden says:
    @Dannyboy

    What did the confederacy fight for? 100 years of poverty for 90 percent of the population? Being an economic colony of northern banks and businesses? Being the cheap labor reservoir of the country? Pellagra and other diseases of malnutrition? And eventual rule by affirmative action blacks?

    • Replies: @Dannyboy
  235. Alden says:
    @Dannyboy

    “hundreds” not even a thousand mulattos in 3 states isn’t much. And it was overwhelmingly White men black women who produced those things, not Irish immigrant women.

  236. Dannyboy says:
    @Alden

    What did the confederacy fight for?

    Well how do you like what you “won” now?

    How many hare brained schemes did the New England elites come up with? Public schools, Prohibition, Female voting/ Feminism etc..etc

    LOL

    • Replies: @Alden
  237. Alden says:
    @Dannyboy

    The confederate states lost. Get over it. FYI, prohibition was more of a southern and midwestern cause then New England. In fact, many southern counties and towns voted dry long before prohibition and remained dry long after prohibition.

    • Replies: @Dannyboy
  238. Dannyboy says:
    @Alden

    B

    The confederate states lost. Get over it.

    Southerners have been “over it “ for quite sometime, sir. I’d say the people who are still obsessing over it are the ones who feel the need to tear down flags and monuments, desecrate graves and blacken the memory of anyone connected with the Confederacy, lest one of their special pets become offended.

    It’s not enough to be conquered, one must also be sufficiently ashamed.

    As for Prohibition, you’re wrong again. The same self righteous do-gooder weirdo fucks who put people in stocks for celebrating Christmas championed that swell idea…lol

    • Replies: @Alden
  239. Alden says:
    @Dannyboy

    No, it was the southern baptists and KKK who were the champions of prohibition. The KKK was run out of Indiana because as soon as prohibition was enacted the Indiana KKK set up roadblocks and started searching cars for alcohol.

    Prohibition of Christmas and prohibition of alcohol were 300 years apart. I believe you have the Irish and Puritan buttinskies of New England confused. You’re confused. There are plenty of confederate heritage sites where you can get together with the lost cause fools. Have you done a DNA test to make sure your confederate ancestors didn’t bequeath you a touch of the tar brush

    The south lost the war. Get used to it.

    • Replies: @Dannyboy
  240. Alden says:
    @Dannyboy

    Stender her parents and grandparents weren’t New England Puritans. Stender never went near the south. She defended California black criminals who were immigrants from the south.

    Much of the civil rights movement was the politicians of the north wreaking revenge on the south for producing the Black Plague that destroyed so many northern cities during and after WW2. Find some other confederate heritage types with which to commiserate.

    • Replies: @Dannyboy
  241. Dannyboy says:
    @Alden

    First statewide prohibition laws in the nation were Maine, Mass and Conn, years before the Volstead Act.

    The American Temperance Society (ATS), formed in Boston in 1826, helped initiate the first temperance movement and served as a foundation for many later groups. By 1835 the ATS had reached 1.5 million members, with women constituting 35% to 60% of its chapters.

    The Prohibition movement, also known as the dry crusade, continued in the 1840s, spearheaded by pietistic religious denominations, especially the Methodists.

    Pietistic denominations in the United States included Northern Methodists, Northern Baptists, Scandinavian Lutherans, Congregationalists, Presbyterians, Disciples of Christ, and some smaller groups. The great majority were based in the northern states; some of these groups in the South would rather support the Democrats.

    In 1881 Kansas became the first state to outlaw alcoholic beverages in its Constitution

    lol…”Jayhawkers”, i.e. Yankees moved West and of course their philosophical brethren, 48’er German Marxists.

    On and on it goes…

    These are the people who believed they were the “elect”, on a divinely mandated mission to stamp out vice and evil, and bring about the “Kingdom of God” on Earth.

    All they end up doing is wreaking havoc, pissing away shit tons of money and making everyone else miserable.

    Sound familiar?

  242. Dannyboy says:
    @Alden

    Stender never went near the south.

    I suggest you actually read the article you’re commenting on before posting, boss.

  243. @Alden

    My dear, misguided, angry and misinformed friend. You remain incorrect. Stop rewatching “Mandingo” and learn some facts. It was Irish females and African males in the colonial Tidewater that led to miscegenation laws, full stop.

    https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2713814.pdf

    White, indentured women such as “Irish Nell” were deliberately married off to Negro slaves to produce a higher class of slave. Archives of Maryland, 1637-1664.

    https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4362&context=flr

    Second, while white Virginians were largely indifferent to the issue of black women having interracial children (as long as the children of slaves were also deemed to be slaves, as called for by the 1662 law), they were deeply troubled by the notion of white women having interracial children. It was white women (and not white men) who were charged with the responsibility of keeping the white race “pure.” White women were understood, in effect, to be the guarantors of racial purity, and, as such, had to be punished when they transgressed by engaging in sexual relationships that crossed racial lines. 28
    For three decades after the enactment of the 1662 statute, the only legal disincentive for white women to engage in sexual relationships with black men was the existence of the fornication statute that doubled the punishment for interracial sex. By definition, however, the crime of fornication did not apply if the individuals in question were married to each other. And, indeed, there are reported cases of white women marrying black men in seventeenth-century Virginia.

  244. @Anon

    Bwa ha ha. Of course they are going to write the law broadly to cover all white women, not just Irish.

    Here’s the story of Irish Nell, Eleanor Butler:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eleanor_Butler

    Butler, who was of Irish origin, was an indentured servant to Charles Calvert, 3rd Baron Baltimore.[1] At around 16 years of age she announced her intention to marry a man referred to only as “Negro Charles”.[2] A 1664[b] Maryland law outlined the legal status of a free woman who voluntarily married a slave: she would serve the master of her husband until his death, and any offspring of their union would be born into slavery.[3][c] Despite this, Butler was determined to be wed.[1] The thought of a white woman becoming a slave apparently distressed Lord Baltimore somewhat, and he warned against the union for that reason.[1]

    Lord Baltimore petitioned Maryland’s provincial assembly to change the 1664 law, and in 1681 key provisions of the law were in fact repealed.[2][4] The new law additionally outlawed marriages between female servants and slaves, and provided for huge punitive fines to be levied on the master of any slave thus wed.[4]

    Despite this, Butler and Charles apparently married in 1681, but before the law went into effect.[3] Because the new law did not apply retroactively, and perhaps also because Lord Baltimore left Maryland indefinitely in 1684,[5] Butler and Charles lived out the rest of their lives as the slaves of William Boarman, Eleanor Butler’s husband’s owner.[1][4] They had seven or eight children, all born after the repeal of the 1664 law, but these were nonetheless born slaves. One son, Jack, apparently escaped and later bought his freedom from the Boarman family.[1] The rest remained chattel.[6]

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Karl Nemmersdorf Comments via RSS