The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Brenton Sanderson Archive
The Jewish War on White Australia
Colin Tatz and the Genocide Charge
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Captain James Cook statue, with graffiti
Captain James Cook statue, with graffiti

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
Table of ContentsOptions
List of Bookmarks

Part One

January 26 is Australia Day, a national public holiday marking the date the first permanent British settlers (mostly convicts) arrived in Sydney in 1788. These thousand or so souls — transported to the other side of the world and told to fend for themselves — laid the foundations for one of the most successful nations in history. Traditionally a day to celebrate this remarkable achievement, Australia Day has, in recent years, been attacked by leftwing activists who, emboldened by the escalating anti-White rhetoric of the intellectual establishment, have rebranded it “Invasion Day.” Every year sees shrill demands for Australia Day to be moved to another date, recast as a day of mourning, or abolished altogether. Despite the growing agitation against Australia Day, two-thirds of Australians favor retaining the date as a national public holiday.

Speaking to an “Invasion Day” protest rally in Melbourne this year, Aboriginal activist Tarneen Onus-Williams, screamed: “Fuck Australia,” expressing her hope “it burns to the ground.” A statement produced by her organization, the so-called Warriors of the Aboriginal Resistance (WAR), drew freely on the Cultural Marxist lexicon, insisting they “would not rest until this entire rotten settler colony called Australia, illegally and violently imposed on stolen Aboriginal land at the expense of the blood of countless thousands, burns to the fucking ground, until every corrupt and illegal institution of white supremacist, patriarchal, capitalist settler colonial power forced upon us is no more… Fuck your flag, your anthem and your precious national day. … Abolish Australia, not just Australia Day.” Aboriginal activist Tony Birch insistedAustralia “does not deserve a national celebration in any capacity,” while Onus-Williams later claimed “people who celebrate Australia Day are celebrating the genocide of Aboriginal people, waving Australian flags in our faces. It’s disgusting.” Aboriginal activist Dan Sultan likewise maintained that Australia Day marks the “day that started the ongoing genocide of our people.” A local councilor for the city of Moreland (in Melbourne) claimed that commemorating Australia Day is “like celebrating the Nazi Holocaust.”

Tarneen Onus-Williams at an “Invasion Day” protest rally on January 26
Tarneen Onus-Williams at an “Invasion Day” protest rally on January 26

The origins of the “genocide” charge embedded in these comments can be traced (inevitably) to a coterie of Jewish academics and intellectuals including, most prominently, Latrobe University historian Tony Barta and Sydney University genocide studies professor and “anti-racism” crusader Colin Tatz. In collaboration with Winton Higgins, Anna Haebich, and A. Dirk Moses, these Jewish intellectual activists have succeeded in ensuring that “genocide is now in the vocabulary of Australian politics.” The word “genocide” was first used regarding Australia’s Aborigines by Barta at an academic conference in 1984 in a presentation entitled “After the Holocaust: Consciousness of Genocide in Australia” where he proclaimed that “genocide had indeed occurred here.”[A1]Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 251. For Barta, a laudable focus on “the Holocaust” had “inhibited consciousness of the violent past that had enabled us to meet on ground named after the colonial secretary, Lord Sydney. The question was equally suppressed where I had settled with my family, the city named after Lord Melbourne.”[A2]Tony Barta, “Realities, Surrealities and the Membrane of Innocence,” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 161.

The policies of the British administrators of the Australian colonies of the late-eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and those of Australian state and federal governments in the twentieth century, cannot, by any objective standard, be regarded as “genocidal” as the term was defined by Raphael Lemkin, the Polish-Jewish jurist who coined it in 1944. The problem for anti-White activists has been that Lemkin’s definition, subsequently adopted by the UN, relies heavily on “intent to destroy,” which has proved problematic in an Australian context where, “without being able to prove intent on behalf of the colonial administration, the case for genocide is weak.”[A3]A. Francis Johnson, Australian Fiction as Archival Salvage: Making and Unmaking the Postcolonial Novel (Boston: Brill Rodopi, 2016), 198. Barta, therefore, redefined “genocide” to make it encompass the totality of European colonial societies like Australia. His redefinition was “a way of obviating the centrality of state policy and premeditation” embedded in Lemkin’s ‘hegemonic intentionalist’ definition of genocide.”[A4]A. Dirk Moses, “Genocide and Settler Society in Australian History” In: Genocide and Settler Society: Frontier Violence and Stolen Indigenous Children in Australian History, Ed. A. Dirk Moses (Sydney: Berghahn Books, 2004), 26.

Lemkin had defined “genocide” as involving “a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of the essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating groups themselves.” Aware no such plan or policies existed for Australia’s Aborigines, Barta — extrapolating the Marxian emphasis on economic relations for understanding sociological reality —argued for “relations of genocide” as an inherent feature of the interaction between Europeans and indigenous peoples in colonial societies like Australia. He writes:

Genocide, strictly, cannot be a crime of unintended consequences; we expect it to be acknowledged in consciousness. In real historical relationships, however, unintended consequences are legion, and it is from the consequences, as well as the often-muddled consciousness, that we have to deduce the real nature of the relationship. In Australia very few people are conscious of having any relationship at all with Aborigines. My thesis is that all white people in Australia do have such a relationship; that in the key relation, the appropriation of the land, it is fundamental to the history of the society in which they live; and that implicitly rather than explicitly, in ways which were inevitable rather than intentional, it is a relationship of genocide.

Such a relationship is systemic, fundamental to the type of society rather than to the type of state, and has historical ramifications extending far beyond any political regime. … My conception of a genocidal society — as distinct from a genocidal state — is one in which the whole bureaucratic apparatus might officially be directed to protect innocent people but in which a whole race is nevertheless subject to remorseless pressures of destruction inherent in the very nature of the society. It is in this sense that I would call Australia, during the whole 200 years of its existence, a genocidal society. [Emphasis added][A5]Tony Barta, Relations of Genocide: Land and Lives in the Colonisation of Australia (Los Angeles: Sage, 2008) 239-40.

Thus “all white people in Australia” are implicated in a “relationship of genocide” with Aborigines even if they (or their ancestors) lacked any such intention, had only benevolent interactions with Aborigines, or had no contact with them at all. When colonial, and later state and federal governments implemented policies designed to protect Aboriginal people, “genocide” was, for Barta, still “inherent in the very nature of the society.” This amounts to a sweeping moral indictment of all White Australians and their ancestors, and of Western civilization generally.

Tony Barta
Tony Barta

Barta’s redefinition of genocide enabled him to conclude that “Australia — not alone among the nations of the colonized world — is a nation founded on genocide.” He advocates this message “be the credo taught to every generation of schoolchildren—the key recognition of Australia as a nation founded on genocide.”[A6]Ibid., 238; 174.
(Tony Barta, Relations of Genocide: Land and Lives in the Colonisation of Australia (Los Angeles: Sage, 2008) 239-40.)
Decades of activism has succeeded in embedding this ahistorical notion in school curricula where White Australian children are encouraged to loathe not only their race, but also their ancestors and to disregard their achievements. The Sydney Jewish Museum is proudly playing its part in training Australian teachers “not only about the Holocaust” but also about “the Australian genocide.” It is this kind of anti-White activism, masquerading as objective historical analysis, that foments the seething hostility to White Australia seen in recent attacks on Australia Day.

This activism, and the widely-publicized removal of confederate monuments in the United States, prompted the disfiguring of a statue of Captain James Cook last year with the slogans “NO PRIDE IN GENOCIDE” and “CHANGE THE DATE” (see lead photograph). Lisa Murray, the City of Sydney’s official historian, defended this act of historical illiteracy (Cook had nothing to do with the First Fleet) for challenging the cultural power of White Australia. For her, the real vandals were the cleaners who removed the graffiti. “Should the graffiti have been removed?” she asked. “Is challenging the dominant historical narrative a legitimate part of the monument’s heritage? I ask again; should the graffiti have been removed. … Slave traders and representatives of colonial imperialism are equally on the nose in Britain, parts of Europe and America.”

Far from being a slave trader, Captain James Cook led a scientific voyage of discovery that charted the east coast of Australia for the first time in a ship containing botanists, an astronomer, artists and boxes of scientific equipment. This reality did not prevent Bronwyn Carlson, a Macquarie University associate professor who identifies as Aboriginal, from calling for tearing down not just Cook’s statue, but those of Lachlan Macquarie, Australia’s fifth colonial governor, on the basis that such statues “continue to represent those people who were part of genocide in this country.”

An “inspirational moment”

Recalling how he was inspired by Barta’s genocide thesis, Jewish academic Colin Tatz claimed it “set my wheels going about seeing not parallels or analogies but echoes of the Holocaust here — at the very least making me realize that genocide doesn’t have to be a sharp annihilatory episode confined to 1939 to 1945.”[A7]Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 251-52. For Tatz, Barta’s presentation was an “inspirational moment and one that became central to my life thereafter.”[A8]Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 499. Embracing and weaponizing the bogus notion of the “Stolen Generations” (discussed in Part 4), Tatz claims that as a result of “the public’s first knowledge of the wholesale removal of Aboriginal children, the dreaded ‘g’ word is firmly with us,” affirming that the “purpose of my university and public courses” is “to keep it here.”[A9]Colin Tatz, With Intent to Destroy: Reflecting on Genocide (London; Verso, 2003), xvi.

Colin Tatz
Colin Tatz

According to Barta, Professor Tatz has “achieved his goals as an activist scholar.” His recent publications include: The Magnitude of Genocide, his memoir Human Rights and Human Wrongs, and his latest book, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide. His work has, unsurprisingly, been praised to the skies by other Jewish activists and intellectuals. Israel Charny, Executive Director of the Institute on the Holocaust and Genocide in Jerusalem described The Magnitude of Genocide, as “an amazingly readable intellectual tour de force. Rarely have I seen the dread topic of genocide addressed so humanely and interestingly.” Acknowledging Tatz’s increasing success in conferring on Australia a global reputation for “genocide,” Barta contends that:

His attack on the membrane of ignorance and innocence was sustained and effective. Work on Australian genocide by other scholars combined with Indigenous activism began to bring international attention to bear on our history. I believe the most cited and defining intervention was Tatz’s 1999 paper “Genocide in Australia,” supported by his path-breaking work on racism. He succeeded in installing genocide studies as an academic discipline with institutional support and founding [the academic journal] Genocide Perspectives to stimulate Australian scholarship in an environment of ignorance, ideology and interests resistant to any association with genocide.[A10]Barta, “Realities, Surrealities and the Membrane of Innocence,” 173-4.

Barta and Tatz, in their determination to associate White Australians with “genocide,” obviously have agendas and interests of their own. Barta’s agenda leads him to insist that White Australians who reject his tendentious characterization of their history, “as settler-colonial, based on genocide,” will necessarily “deny others their history — as victims or perpetrators or bystanders — of conflicts elsewhere.”[A11]Ibid., 66.
(Barta, “Realities, Surrealities and the Membrane of Innocence,” 173-4.)
The result of the “genocide denial” of White Australians is, he contends, the creation of “a climate in which Australia shows no compassion for those fleeing conflict and seeking better lives elsewhere.”[A12]Ibid., 66-7.
(Barta, “Realities, Surrealities and the Membrane of Innocence,” 173-4.)

Here the real motivation of Barta’s intellectual activism is revealed: the inculcation of White guilt to suppress opposition to non-White immigration and multiculturalism. Barta’s colleague, A. Dirk Moses, recently associated critics of these policies with “Anders Breivik and Steven Bannon” for their suggesting “Western countries are succumbing to a poisonous cocktail of multiculturalism, Muslim immigration, political correctness and cultural Marxism that dilutes the white population and brainwashes young people at school and university.” According to Tatz, White people who reject his “genocide” label exhibit psychological disturbances manifested in “paroxysms, ranging from upset to extreme angst to even more extreme anger, when the (literal) spectres of genocide appear as facets of their proudly democratic histories.”[A13]Tatz, With Intent to Destroy, xiii; xvi.

Inevitably, Barta and Tatz liken rejection of, or even ambivalence toward, their assertion that “Australia is a nation built on genocide” to “Holocaust denial.” Here they are joined by fellow Jewish academic and leading proponent of the “Stolen Generations” myth, Professor Robert Manne. Former editor in chief of The Australian, Chris Mitchell, noted Manne’s penchant for “manipulation of the idea of the Holocaust for political advantage, particularly in the Stolen Generations debate,” observing “this Holocaust tactic, like the related use of the word ‘denier,’ is a simple trick to undermine an opponent’s moral position when a polemicist has little intellectual case.”[A14]Chris Mitchell, “A critic untroubled by facts who seeks to silence dissent,” The Australian (Sydney, September 17, 2011). In levelling the “genocide” charge against White Australians, these Jewish activists seek to exert the kind of psychological leverage used so effectively against Germans, who, as Tatz notes, are “weighed down by the Schuldfrage (guilt question)” to such an extent that “guilt, remorse, shame permeate today’s Germany.”[A15]Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 3009.

Robert Manne’s essay “In Denial: The Stolen Generations and the Right” as published in ultra-Zionist Morrie Schwartz’s Quarterly Essay
Robert Manne’s essay “In Denial: The Stolen Generations and the Right” as published in ultra-Zionist Morrie Schwartz’s Quarterly Essay

Tatz has dedicated his professional life to ensuring that an analogous guilt permeates and becomes indissolubly linked with White Australian identity. In this endeavor, he is careful, however, not to detract from the metaphysical pre-eminence of “the Holocaust.”[A16]Tatz, With Intent to Destroy, xiii. A writer for the Australian Jewish News notes how “painful memories of the Holocaust still resonate and make us sensitive to comparisons,” emphasizing the supreme importance of ensuring that “recognizing the genocide of the Aboriginal inhabitants of Australia does not diminish the horror of the Holocaust.” To mitigate this danger, Tatz insists that, in discussing other putative genocides, scholars have an obligation to never “ignore, or evade, the lessons and legacies of the Holocaust in pursuit of other case histories.” The Holocaust must forever remain “the paradigm case, the one more analyzed, studied, dissected, filmed, dramatized than all other cases put together.” It must endure as “the yardstick by which we measure many things” and be the highest point on “a ‘Richter Scale’ that can help us to locate the intensity, immensity of a case so that we don’t equate all genocides.”[A17]Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 261.

Jews at the forefront of Aboriginal activism

Australia’s Aborigines, in contrast to Jews, are a group characterized by extremely low average intelligence, and are, therefore, a poorly organized and essentially headless community devoid of effective leadership. It is unsurprising, therefore, that activist Jews, with their deep animosity toward Europeans, have been pivotal in establishing, funding, and leading Aboriginal activist organizations. This Jewish activist front is an adjunct of a broader campaign by transform Australia through non-White immigration and multiculturalism. Dan Goldberg, journalist for Haaretz and former editor of the Australian Jewish News, observed how “In addition to their activism on Aboriginal issues, Jews were instrumental in leading the crusade against the White Australia policy, a series of laws from 1901 to 1973 that restricted non-White immigration to Australia.”

Jewish journalist Debra Jobson insists that “Indigenous people need additional voices raised on their behalf given that the ‘tyranny of the majority’ can oppress within a democracy, as we can see in Trump’s America.” For the Jewish academic Nikki Marczak, the intellectual activism of Colin Tatz “embodies the relationship between the Jewish community and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.” Tatz, who describes himself as “the anthropologist of the White tribes of policy makers and bureaucrats,” is frustrated by “the reluctance of Aborigines to go international with their grievances. There is some external activity but not nearly enough when compared to the strategies of other minority groups.”[A18]Ibid., 356.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 261.)
Noting the outsized Jewish contribution to Aboriginal activism in Australia going back decades, The Sydney Jewish Museum declared last year that:

When we say, “never again” to the Holocaust, we make a moral judgment about the German nation. We don’t accept the claim that they didn’t know. Many did know, and those who didn’t, should have. Thanks to the work of scholars like Colin Tatz and the work of lawyers like Ron Castan, in 1992 in the Mabo Case, the High Court was able to make a judicial statement that “Aborigines were dispossessed of their land parcel by parcel, to make way for the expanding colonial settlement.” … The late Ron Castan summarised it well when he commented on what motivated his legal work for Aboriginal people: “What was the meaning of my determination to do my part never to permit a future destruction of the Jewish people, if I just stood by and participated in the bounty and opportunity of the Australian nation?

In a 1998 speech, Castan implored the government to say it was sorry, citing Holocaust denial in his argument: “The refusal to apologize for dispossession, for massacres and for the theft of children is the Australian equivalent of the Holocaust deniers — those who say it never really happened.”

Tatz welcomes the fact that White Australian identity has increasingly broken down when “confronted with increasingly strident Aboriginal assertions and other ethnic challenges to the assimilationist mould. The old shibboleths about ‘one people’ people sharing the same hopes, loyalties, customs and beliefs began to fragment some time ago.”[A19]Tatz, With Intent to Destory, xvi. This social fragmentation is the direct (and fully intended) result of mass non-White immigration and multiculturalism: Jewish-originated and -championed policies designed to preserve Jewish particularism, while demographically, politically and culturally weakening a White Australia seen as threatening to Jews. The supposed benefits to Australian Jewry of this social transformation, most notably the diminished threat of the emergence of a mass movement of anti-Semitism among White Australians, is perceived to outweigh any negative effects of large scale immigration like the fact that “Some Australian Jews fear that migrants arriving from Muslim countries will contribute to anti-Semitic currents in Australia, inflame extremist groups and pose a threat to the relative peace they currently enjoy.”[A20]Marcus Einfeld, “We Too Have Been Strangers: Jews and the Refugee Struggle,” In: New Under the Sun — Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski (Melbourne: Black Inc., 2006), 311 & 314.

Activist Jews know full well that racial and cultural heterogeneity are prime sources of national weakness. In a recent opinion piece entitled “Iran is Hardly a Nation and Will Likely Fall Apart,” Mordechai Kedar, a Zionist academic from Bar-Ilan University in Israel, contended that “there is no such thing as an Iranian people or an Iranian nation.” Instead, Iran is, he asserts, a country divided into various ethnic and religious groups riven by conflicting interests. He notes that “All these parts of the population have little in common, the awareness of nationhood is weak and, as a result, the state is always under threat of breaking apart.” He urges Western nations to facilitate this disintegration by finding “those anti-ayatollah forces” to “support them and empower them to bring Iran to the same end that met the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia by creating homogenous ethnic states on the ruins of the artificial state of Iran.” Divide and conquer remains the overriding Jewish group strategy pursued at both national and international levels.

Part Two

Professor Colin Tatz
Professor Colin Tatz

Colin Tatz is a stereotypical Jewish intellectual activist whose mindset is characterized by an intense ethnocentrism and an equally intense hostility to the traditional people and culture of the West. He reflexively subjects White people and Western societies to radical critique while exempting Jews from any equivalent evaluation. Identifying with, and taking great pride in the Jewish penchant for critiquing Western societies, Tatz claims that “Whatever else, I am a ‘product’ of Lasswell, of Cecil Roth and his notion that Jews (or some Jews) are the eternal protest-ants, of the doctrine of the Jewish Sages about tikkun olam. It is a synonym for social action, a conscious manipulating of skills to be proactive rather than reflective or contemplative.”[B1]Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 347.

Cecil Roth, a Jewish historian, had argued “Jewish intellectualism” was primarily about “protesting at the insufficiency of the status quo.” Tatz agrees, and points to “a Jewish existential value which asserts that history has taught us that whatever is, no matter what it is, it is not good enough—hence the moral dictate of tikkun olam, that one is compelled to try to repair a flawed world.”[B2]Ibid., 345.
(Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 347.)
Of course, for “fiercely argumentative” Jews like Tatz, a “flawed world” is any world where Jewish interests are not forever prioritized. Tatz claims that “My activism is motivated by both personal and societal alienation,” and the “inner dynamic of my life, the foremost factor, is my version and interpretation of my Jewishness.” He notes that a “related if not conjoined propulsion” is “a lifelong devotion to matters of race and racism.”[B3]Ibid., 5.
(Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 347.)

Tatz makes no pretense of Jewishness being anything but an essentially biological phenomenon. Despite being an avowed atheist he remains a proud Jew, declaring his “unshakeable admiration, even a veneration for what I call Jewishness,” observing how “I remain within even while lacking faith, ritual, observance or any sense of Covenant.”[B4]Ibid., 345.
(Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 347.)
For Tatz, Jews comprise an easily identifiable ethnic type characterized by “body mannerisms, the shrugs, distains, the ever-present deprecatory and interrogative tenses of body and voice.”[B5]Ibid., 346.
(Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 347.)

Tatz is a descendent of the Litvaks, the Jews from Lithuania who, prior to their recent mass exodus from post-Apartheid South Africa to countries like Britain and Australia, made up ninety per cent of that country’s 120,000 Jews. According to Tatz, Lithuanian Jews were “economically forlorn and politically intimidated” and left Lithuania in “hordes” in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the majority landing in England, the United States and South Africa. He notes that “In South Africa I learned to live in a Lithuanian communitas, a transposed shtetl world of like-minded, like-speaking, like-behaving people. It was a society in transition from Tsarist oppression to a semi-welcomed ethnic minority moving into modernity.”[B6]Ibid., 348.
(Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 347.)
The hyper-ethnocentric mentality of South Africa’s Lithuanian Jews was encapsulated in “daily pontification about the Jewish-goyishe divide” and his grandfather’s refrain that “The worst of ours are better than the best of theirs.”[B7]Ibid., 16.
(Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 347.)

During World War II the South African government officially supported the Allies, with Prime Minister Jan Smuts appointed to Britain’s war cabinet. Despite this, most Afrikaners backed the Germans, and Tatz claims his childhood in South Africa in the 1940s was dominated by awareness of “a raging world war, civil strife between the pro- and anti-war forces, between English- and Afrikaans-speakers for political power, violent anti-Semitism in a country rife with fascist movements, the seeming calamity for Jews when the Nationalist Party came to power in the late 1940s, the fear of rising racial tensions of the 1940s, 1950s and beyond.”[B8]Ibid., 15.
(Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 347.)
Tatz claims to still be haunted by “domains that are oppressively black and cruelly white; and me, not quite a crowd—Jewish, alienated, migratory, and deeply troubled by food.”

Colin Tatz in South Africa in the 1950s
Colin Tatz in South Africa in the 1950s

Tatz’s obsession with the inveterate “anti-Semitism” of White people took deep root early in 1945 when, attending a cinema, “a loud but hidden voice hushed the cinema audience, urging children under twelve to leave the cinema for ten minutes or to place hands over their eyes. We stayed and peeked through fingers—at the first Bergen-Belsen footage. This was incomprehensible: how could people be so skeletal? Were they human? Were they us?” It was under the strength of such early influences that his “morbid obsession with genocide had begun.”[B9]Ibid., 35; 36.
(Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 347.)
This ultimately led to his “studying, teaching, writing and talking a great deal about genocide and Holocaust especially.”[B10]Ibid., 5.
(Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 347.)
Tatz is one of those Jews, who, as he expresses it, bases “their quintessential beings—their political and psychological souls and psyches—on their genocidal victimhood.”[B11]Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 2181.

Hatred of Daniel Malan

In 1948 the Nationalist Party of Daniel François Malan came to power in South Africa on a platform of greater segregation of the four officially recognized races: Whites (or Europeans), the Cape Colored people (originally descendants of mixed unions between male Dutch East India Company officials, local farmers, soldiers, and settlers with local Hottentot and Bushman women), Indians (originally indentured Tamil laborers), and the Black majority (Bantu-speaking Africans known variously as Kaffirs, Natives, Bantu and Blacks). While Malan coined the term “apartheid,” South Africa’s first laws, regulations, and customs segregating the races date back to the 1770s. Apartheid was subsequently extended and entrenched under the “granite philosophy” of Dr Henrik Verwoerd in the 1950s who regarded it as model for the rest of the world to follow. Tatz claims that:

In early teenage years I began to take notice of the separate racial facilities: red buses and trams for Whites, green ones for Blacks, each with its own stops; separate ambulances; separate elevators in buildings; separate queues in post offices; different hospitals; all-White schools (we didn’t even know where Black children went to school); all-White cinemas, concerts; separate and much smaller stands for blacks at sports events; separate entrances and exits in buildings and businesses; Blanke and nie-Blanke signs on public benches and public toilets. Churches were segregated in the sense that Whites and Blacks attended in separate shifts: Blacks usually at the earliest possible time slots and Whites at the most convenient ones.[B12]Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 58.

Tatz claims to have found all this deeply morally offensive, despite Jewish ethnic segregation having been a normative part of the Lithuanian Jewish subculture he claims to still revere. His real aversion to the South Africa of his youth lay, however, in what he describes as “the virulent anti-Semitism of Afrikaner nationalism and the right-wing movements.” According to Tatz, the atmosphere was such that “I didn’t really belong; on the surface, yes, but more a sense of toleration by virtue of being considered, but only barely, part of the ‘White race.’”[B13]Ibid., 55.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 58.)
The South African state classified Litvaks, who made up 90 per cent of South Africa’s 120,000 Jews, as White, but neither the Afrikaners nor British descendants welcomed these clannish interlopers.

In the mid-1930s South Africa stopped all Jewish immigration. Malan, an Afrikaner nationalist acutely aware of the Jewish Question, declared in 1939 that “We have, moreover, the Jewish problem which hangs like a dark cloud over South Africa. Behind organized Jewry stands the organized Jewry of the world. They have so robbed the population of its heritage that the Afrikaner resides in the land of his fathers but no longer possesses it.”[B14]Ibid., 52.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 58.)
According to Tatz, Malan, whom he regards as demonic figure, “cuddled and coddled” the various pro-German Shirt movements like the Ossewa Brandwag (Ox-Wagon Guard) who “attacked synagogues [and] Jewish shops . . . and printed and distributed Nazi leaflets and propaganda.” Malan, who would go on to lead South Africa as Prime Minister between 1948 and 1954, regarded Jews as an “unabsorbable minority.”[B15]Ibid.,11.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 58.)

Daniel François Malan
Daniel François Malan

Despite their relative economic success, many South African Jews felt alienated by life under Malan’s rule, and Tatz claims that “Here, indeed, was a special kind of alienation, of belonging but not quite belonging, of Jews hoping, believing, even preaching, that they were mainstream South Africans but somehow sensing that they had no place in this white South Africanism.”[B16]Colin Tatz, With Intent to Destroy: Reflecting on Genocide (London; Verso, 2003), 4. Tatz heard that thirteen Jewish families had migrated to Australia in 1948 “on the basis that life under the frightening Dr Malan wasn’t livable.”[B17]Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 107. He was, a decade later, to join them.

As a deeply (and stereotypically) alienated Jew, Tatz assessed that life in apartheid South Africa presented him with five options. He dismissed the first, of identifying with mainstream Afrikaner nationalism, as “impossible.” The second, of identifying with Black nationalist movements, initially attractive, was ultimately not to his taste either. The third option, embraced by many South African Jews, was to join the Communist Party. Tatz claims he rejected this option because he didn’t need the “false camaraderie which accompanied Jews when they joined the Russian Revolution in 1917.”[B18]Tatz, With Intent to Destroy, 7. The fourth option was “to put on blinkers and pretend that there was nothing amiss around me.” For the intensely political Tatz, this was simply “out of the question.” The fifth option, which he initially adopted, was to stay in South Africa and “write critiques of the system.” He pursued this option while a postgraduate student at the University of Natal, and it led to his first book, Shadow and Substance, written as a moral critique of South Africa’s racial policies. The sixth option, which he ultimately embraced, was “to remove myself from this environment altogether.”

The disingenuous nature of Tatz’s moral opposition to apartheid South Africa is revealed by the fact that, having committed himself to emigration, his first preference was to head to Israel: a nation founded on terrorism, ethnic cleansing, and institutionalized ethnic discrimination and apartheid. Tatz recounts that by 1959 he had decided to leave South Africa with his wife Sandra by the end of 1960. His plans changed when he was informed that an academic job was unlikely to become available in Israel because rich American professors “were free to volunteer their vacation services and they occupied all positions.” Tatz claims that, “Pretty shaken at the rejection of what I believed was young and willing talent, we were at a loss. Part of me still tells me that we should have persisted, and that Israel was the emotionally sensible place to be.”[B19]Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 101.

Tatz sees no irony in his desire to leave a supposedly morally-objectionable South Africa for the Jewish ethno-state of Israel.[B20]Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 108. One searches in vain through his voluminous writings on “genocide” and “racism” for even passing acknowledgement that Israel was founded on ethnic cleansing (where ninety per cent of the Indigenous Palestinian population have been killed or expelled). The Zionist project has created some eight million Palestinian refugees, and the highly abusive, violent and indefinite confinement of presently five million Palestinians: two million in the Gaza Strip and three million in the West Bank. Israeli Palestinians live as third-class citizens under a two-tier political and legal system. None of this is ever mentioned, let alone condemned, by the sanctimonious Tatz, nor the fact that Israel’s immigration policy openly discriminates against non-Jews, and bans marriage between Jews and non-Jews.

Instead he remains a fervent Zionist, and recounts how arriving in Israel in 1976, thanks to a state-sponsored three-week visit, “was an emotional turmoil evoking pangs about why I wasn’t there as a resident.”[B21]Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 217. While in Israel, Tatz was given access to figures like General Moshe Dayan, Prime Minister Yitzak Rabin, the Eichmann Prosecutor Gideon Hausner and Foreign Minister Abba Eban. He recalls that “I hardly needed such a visit to make me Israel-aware, but the visit evoked an emotional reaction. I couldn’t wait to go there again and again.”[B22]Ibid., 219.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 217.)

The rank (but entirely characteristic) hypocrisy of this Jewish intellectual activist is also evident in his having written several books about the “racism” supposedly endemic in Australian sport while participating in the Maccabi Games in Israel—a strictly Jews-only sporting festival. In his 2011 book One-Eyed: A View of Australian Sport, he contended that Australia’s traditional preoccupation with sport was evidence of the deep-seated racism and misogyny that undergirded White Australian society, and touted his book is a “strong and provocative piece of social and political criticism” that explores themes of “militarism, or Empire-ism, Britain’s motherhood, sport and war, sport as moral education, anti-femininity, racism” amongst others.[B23]Ibid., 306.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 217.)

Since the end of apartheid, over 15,000 South African Jews have migrated to this incurably “racist” Australia. Tatz claims these Jews “are the world’s most educated émigrés, 70.8 per cent at tertiary level, the most well-heeled, the most cosmopolitan in the way they travel, the only migrant group capable of spending time and money coming on visits before selecting their relocation spots.”[B24]Ibid., 350.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 217.)
Even he has been taken aback by the insularity of these newcomers, observing how “socially, spatially, culturally, religiously, they huddle in enclaves of their own creation.” “Marrying out” for these intensely parochial Jews means marrying a non-South African Jewish spouse.

Tatz ascribes this hyper-ethnocentrism to the fact that “the shtetl remains engraved in their immigrant souls.” From the time of the mass Jewish exodus from Lithuania to South Africa in the early twentieth century, these Jews were, he notes, “saturated” with the notion of separateness. Ever-willing to wallow in the soothing psychological balm of lachrymose Jewish victimhood narratives, he also attributes their extreme ingroup preference to “the specter of antisemitism, the dark shadow of rejection by an anti-Semitic and intolerant world.” It is only among themselves, he maintains, that they can “relax at least for a while—laugh, cry, be brash, busy, creative, funny and not worry about what the goyim think.”[B25]Ibid.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 217.)
The reputation of South African Jews in Australia took a significant hit in 2009 when the Sydney Morning Herald reportedthat Barry Tannenbaum, a South African Jewish immigrant, had scammed investors out of $1.5 billion in a Ponzi scheme that was likened to Bernie Madoff’s crime in the United States.

Tatz evinces no embarrassment at the state of the post-Apartheid South Africa that he and countless other Jews strived to bring about (Jews made up all six of the “whites” indicted in the Rivonia Trial of 1963 when several leaders of ANC, including Mandela, were given life sentences for plotting terrorism against the government). “I have taught many courses on South African racial history” he observes, “and still find the energy to read of events in the ‘rainbow country’—even with a doom-laden sense of watching a failed state or one looking perilously like one.”[B26]Ibid., 349.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 217.)
Ignoring the ongoing mass murder of White South African farmers, he notes with anguish how Cape Coloreds, now ten percent of the population, “are increasingly converts to militant Islam, filled with Jihadist hate and violence, especially towards Cape Town’s remnant Jewish population.”[B27]Ibid., 56.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 217.)

Arriving in Australia

Jewish cartoonist Jonathon Shapiro recently equated Australian Immigration Minister Peter Dutton with leaders of apartheid South Africa for his willingness to save White South African farmers from mass murder
Jewish cartoonist Jonathon Shapiro recently equated Australian Immigration Minister Peter Dutton with leaders of apartheid South Africa for his willingness to save White South African farmers from mass murder

Having been generously allowed to migrate to Australia in 1960 to pursue postgraduate studies at the Australian National University in Canberra, Tatz repaid the hospitality of his new host by plunging into what he describes as the “unexpectedly depressing realm of Australia’s race relations.”[B28]Ibid., 113.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 217.)
Arriving in Canberra he quickly plugged into Jewish ethnic networks.

On my first day I walked to the nearest payphone, looked up J for Jewish, found a number and spoke to a public servant, David Smith, later official secretary to five Governors-General and knighted. Stay where you are, he said, and 20 minutes later we were under his family’s friendly wing. The very small Jewish community met for a few services at the Riverside Huts and for the high holy days in a hired trade union hall, and although we couldn’t contribute financially we were accepted as fully-fledged members of that small society[B29]Ibid., 116.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 217.)

Tatz speaks with contempt of the Anglo-Australian society of the 1960s and 1970s that he and his family “endured.” A move from Canberra to Melbourne was prompted by his appointment as a lecturer in politics and sociology at Monash University. Life in a prosperous, safe and orderly White middleclass suburb of Melbourne was purgatory for Tatz, who recalls how “We lived in Mount Waverley—then a social and cultural disaster zone but reasonably close to Monash—and endured that suburban wasteland from 1964 to the end of 1970. The American Jewish comic Allan Sherman once said he lived in 10 Sparrowfart Lane; our house was definitely number 8.”[B30]Ibid., 154.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 217.)

Further ethnic networking led to his wife landing “a useful and attractive job at Jewish Welfare in [the suburb of] South Yarra, as assistant to Walter Lippmann, an outstanding figure in Jewish multicultural and migration affairs.”[B31]Ibid.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 217.)
Walter Lippmann was, as I have previously discussed, the driving force behind getting “multiculturalism” embedded at the heart of state and federal government social policy. Lippmann also successfully lobbied for the creation of Australia’s first dedicated refugee policy and, then, its expansion in numbers and countries of origin.

Distaining to send his three children to a local school “heavily populated by a Christian Science congregation,” Tatz approached

Bialik College, a Zionist-oriented Jewish Day School in [the inner Melbourne suburb of] Hawthorn. Despite our inability to meet the fees, the Israeli principal wanted the three children. It was arranged that we could make desultory payments until our fortunes improved. The school was good for the children. They rode to school in a taxi subsidized by Bialik but even with that trip taken care of, Sandra drove something like 80km daily.[B32]Ibid., 154-5
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 217.)

Tatz’s willingness to go to extreme lengths to avoid sending his children to a local goyish school is noteworthy given his claims to have first become aware of “social injustice,” and that “something was particularly amiss for Jews” in South Africa, in noticing the separation of Jewish and non-Jewish students at his school in South Africa, the King Edward VII High School, where “We were kept truly apart . . . with no explanation or justification.” For Tatz, this “embryonic awareness launched a lifelong journey into the study of politics and race.”

Australian patriotism Bialik College-style
Australian patriotism Bialik College-style

Tatz left Monash University in 1971 after being appointed the chair of politics at the University of New England in New South Wales where he established courses “on comparative race politics, racism and nationalism, and on Aboriginal studies for teacher trainees in particular.”[B33]Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 490. In 1982 he took up the chair of politics at Macquarie University in Sydney. After studying at the Yad Vashem Holocaust Center in Jerusalem in 1986, he founded the Centre for Comparative Genocide Studies and introduced a genocide studies course at Macquarie. It was during repeated visits to Yad Vashem in the 1980s that he claims his “experiences, observations and analyses of racism merged into a stream of Holocaust consciousness.”[B34]Douglas Booth “Colin Tatz: Compelled to Repair a Flawed World” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 7. Yad Vashem provided him with a new “analytical toolbox” in which the Holocaust connected seemingly disparate cases of racism, such as those experienced by Aboriginal Australians and Native Americans, that at first glance “have little in common with processes in the Third Reich.”[B35]Colin Tatz & Winton Higgins, The Magnitude of Genocide, (Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2016), xii. Dissatisfied with funding, Tatz relocated the center to the University of New South Wales in 1999.

Kevin MacDonald has written extensively about the Jewish guru phenomenon, of Jewish intellectual leaders who take on a semi-divine status in the minds of their adoring acolytes. Tatz’s guru is the “great Holocaust scholar” Yehuda Bauer who he describes as his “mentor and inspiration.”[B36]Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 22. Tatz first met his idol at Yad Vashem during the first Gulf War in 1991, and claims hearing or reading Bauer always left him awestruck by his “intensity, passion, and dedication to both detail and to the broader sweeps of that history.”[B37]Ibid., 359.
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 22.)
The lessons that Tatz internalized from his guru are that White people are inveterate and incorrigible “anti-Semites” and that the hopes of Jewish activist organizations of eventually eliminating “anti-Semitism” are illusory:

Yehuda Bauer once said that of the death of 50 million people worldwide because of Hitler’s war against the Jews doesn’t deter people from hating, baiting and harming Jews, then nothing will. A sobering thought as I have come to accept his dictum that anti-Semitism is part of the Western world’s intellectual and populist baggage. It has always been there and always will be despite some valiant efforts by Jewish organizations to combat it. … If one believes that anti-Semitism is a “disease,” a “mental disorder,” one can understand the efforts at therapy. If one accepts it as “normal,” one can stop chasing down badly or insultingly worded crossword clues, offbeat comments on talkback radio, criticism of Israel and its military and [golf club] Royal Sydney’s membership policy. I believe that sanction is the only plausible remedy, one that can halt overt action against people and property; some Australian jurisdictions are halfway there with the criminalization of hate speech and incitement to racial hatred. Although you can do something to stop anti-Semitic behavior, you can’t stop the mindsets.[B38]Ibid., 305
(Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 22.)

A proponent of the full criminalization of “anti-Semitism,” Tatz is generally skeptical of attempts by Jewish activist organizations to fight criticism of Jews through re-education programs like “Click against Hate,” an “early intervention” program run by Australia’s Anti-Defamation Commission for schoolchildren from Years 5 to 10 that is funded by billionaire Jewish property developer (and ardent Zionist) John Gandel. Tatz maintains that:

Race relations education programs the world over have shown that trying to educate people out of their racism doesn’t work. Founded in 1913, the reputable Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in the United States is dedicated to fighting anti-Semitism and all forms of bigotry. It has had a few wins and a few interventions, but essentially one has to say that its campaigns on anti-Jewish sentiment and behavior has had little, if any, success in broad terms. (Much of the anti-defamation activity the world over treats racism as some form of illness and in need of a therapeutic approach. For reasons difficult to comprehend, making racism illegal is rarely considered an option.)[B39]Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 3210-3211.

Despite his skepticism regarding the effectiveness of Jewish re-education programs, Tatz remains a staunch advocate for the introduction of courses about Aborigines, anti-Semitism, and “the Holocaust” in schools and universities. Despite the ubiquity of “the Holocaust” in Western culture, with its constant solicitations to White guilt, Tatz finds “disturbing” the “reluctance of curriculum-setting people, in schools and universities, to take the subject on board.”[B40]Tatz, With Intent to Destroy: Reflecting on Genocide, xvii. In 2012 the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies succeeded, after intense lobbying, in having study of “the Holocaust” mandated for all New South Wales school students. Tatz recommends that all students should make a pilgrimage to the Holocaust shrine of Auschwitz. His massage is “to go and see it, feel it, cry, gasp, take very deep breaths, and then recognize, in this very place, the stark reality that Jews will never be liked, let alone loved; that despite European Jewry enriching the world, much of the European world wanted to be rid of Jews and assisted the Nazis in their mission.”[B41]Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 340-41.

Part Three

Professor Colin Tatz
Professor Colin Tatz

Critiquing Australia

From his arrival in Australia in 1961, Colin Tatz quickly identified those aspects of Australian society to his extreme distaste—what he describes as the “warts, some of which I have watched grow into malignant lumps.”[C1]Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 347. Foremost among these, he claims, was the gap in social indicators between White Australians and the Aborigines. Australia’s indigenous population has always had the worst health, and the lowest educational, occupational, economic, and social status of any identifiable section of the Australian population. The annual report on progress in the Australian government’s strategy of “Closing the Gap” between indigenous and non-indigenous Australians has been called an “annual statement of failure, a catalogue of defeat.”

In 2015–16, $33.4 billion of Australian taxpayers’ money was spent on Aboriginal programs: $44,886 for every Aborigine in the nation. More than a thousand government initiatives seek to ameliorate the myriad manifestations of Aboriginal social and economic dysfunction. In many communities there is one service for every five residents. Wilcannia, in New South Wales, for example, had 102 funded services in 2012 for an indigenous population of 474. Despite this, Aboriginal people continue to trail other Australians in virtually all metrics including life expectancy, child mortality, health, education and employment. As journalist Grace Collier noted: “The problems are shocking but seem intractable—we feel horrified and helpless; we don’t know how to assist. Worse, no matter how much money we give, it is never enough. Thirty-three billion dollars a year goes off into the ether, never to be seen again, and nothing seems to ever improve.”

Despite the burgeoning funding of proliferating Aboriginal programs, the Aboriginal leader and activist June Oscar had the nerve to excoriate successive governments for “abandoning” their commitment to tackling Aboriginal disadvantage, and for failing to execute and adequately fund Closing the Gap. Rather than responsibility for the lack of any improvement residing with Aboriginal people themselves, Oscar maintained that failure of achieve the Closing the Gap targets measured nothing but “the collective failure of Australian governments to work together and stay the course.”

Closing the Gap Data: The Gap in School Attendance is Clearly the Result of White Racism
Closing the Gap Data: The Gap in School Attendance is Clearly the Result of White Racism

Colin Tatz is dismissive of government efforts to close the gulf between Aborigines and non-Aborigines, arguing this approach “reduces Aboriginal Australians to a range of indicators of deficit, to be monitored and rectified towards government-set standards.”[C2]Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 1772. In his view, the Closing the Gap strategy is more about “achieving government desires to alter statistics that look bad for us, a First World prosperous country.”[C3]Ibid., 3169.
(Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 1772.)
Tatz attributes the dysfunction in Aboriginal communities not to Aborigines themselves, but to the poor treatment he claims they receive at the hands of White Australian bureaucrats, whose efforts to relieve Aboriginal distress are merely designed “to make the ‘rescuers’ look better, more like decent and democratic colonisers.”[C4]Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 355.

This attempt to blame the intractable social pathologies of Australia’s Aborigines on the evil legacy of European colonialism, “genocide” and “racism” is the purest anti-White propaganda. The traditional hunter-gatherer lifestyle of the Australia’s Aborigines was severely disrupted by the arrival of Europeans. There were around 300,000 Aborigines in Australia at the time of European colonization in 1788. Their numbers declined considerably in the decades that followed, mainly due to diseases contracted from Europeans for which they had no immunity. Aborigines were also killed by Whites in violent clashes on the frontier—often in reprisal for attacks on Whites. Violence against Aborigines was specifically prohibited by the governing authorities, and White settlers were charged with murder and executed for killing Aborigines. The 1961 census reported that the Aboriginal population of Australia at around 106,000. This had increased to 171,000 by 1981, and, incredibly, to over 800,000 in the 2016 census, suggesting the $33 billion in Closing the Gap programs is fueling a population boom. This figure has been inflated by those with tiny amounts of Aboriginal ancestry (or none) now claiming to be Aboriginal to take advantage of the ever-multiplying indigenous welfare programs, scholarships and career opportunities.

Denial of low Aboriginal IQ

Notwithstanding the fact European colonization had a range of negative effects on Australia’s Aborigines, the real (though never acknowledged) source of their dysfunctional communities is their extraordinarily low average intelligence. According to psychologist Richard Lynn, the first attempt to estimate the intelligence of the Australian Aborigines was made by Francis Galton in 1869. From descriptions of their accomplishments, he estimated that their intelligence was approximately three “grades” below that of the English. Lynn explains that: “In Galton’s metric, a grade was equivalent to 10.4 IQ points. Hence in terms of the IQ scale, he estimated the Australian Aborigine IQ at 68.8. Seventeen studies of the intelligence of Australian Aborigines assessed by intelligence tests have shown that this was a fairly accurate assessment. … The median IQ of the seventeen studies is 62 and represents the best estimate of the average intelligence of Australia’s Aborigines”[C5]Richard Lynn, The Global Bell Curve (Washington Summit, 2010), 47-8.

The findings from studies into Aboriginal IQ have been corroborated by a study showing Aborigines have slower reaction times (reaction time being moderately correlated with IQ). Four studies of the average IQ of Aboriginal-European hybrids put it at 78—midway between the IQs of Aborigines and Europeans. The low average intelligence of Aborigines is supported by their very low levels of educational attainment. Lynn notes that: “Aborigines do poorly in education, consistently with their low intelligence, showing that their low cognitive abilities are not confined to their performance on intelligence tests.”[C6]Ibid., 48.
(Richard Lynn, The Global Bell Curve (Washington Summit, 2010), 47-8.)
A recent report from the Grattan Institute found that remote indigenous children are five years behind the typical student in numeracy, six years behind in reading, and seven to eight years behind in writing by the time they are in Year 9 [aged 15]. “In other words,” according to the study author Peter Goss, “the average Year 9 indigenous student in a very remote area scores worse on the NAPLAN writing test than the average Year 3 [aged 8] non-indigenous student.” The reality is that a population with a mean IQ of 62 (or even 78 for mixed race Aborigines) is incapable of functioning effectively in a modern technological society like Australia.

Tatz exposes himself as an intellectual charlatan in his comprehensive rejection of the accumulated evidence demonstrating racial differences in average intelligence. In his determination to subordinate the truth to his ethnic agenda, Tatz, who purports to be “meticulous about matters of fact,” dismisses the accumulated psychometric evidence by deploying the epithet “scientistic racism.” His rhetorical technique is not to cite contradictory evidence (for there is none), but to catalogue the supposedly wrongheaded and malevolent claims about race that, he insists, Western scientists have historically used to justify the oppression of non-Whites:

Appreciating the race factor also requires going through the growth of “scientistic racism,” that is, the works of anatomists and physical anthropologists who began to examine and compare the human form and then started to attribute social characteristics to the physical ones. When physical forms as such could not establish a “suitable” hierarchy of races, they turned to measurements of “intelligence,” using craniology (skull measurement) as the ultimate criterion. Researchers concluded that Caucasians—named after what was thought to be the perfect (“white”) skull found in the Caucasus mountains in Russia—had the largest brain casing (87 cubic inches), according to physician Samuel Morton in his Crania Americana (1839). Native Americans had a mean volume of 82 cubic inches (measured using mustard seed) that, Morton deduced, made them slow of thought, averse to agriculture, vengeful, and lovers of warfare. Ethiopian and black skulls held an even smaller quantity of seed (78 cubic inches) but their owners’ bodies were the more muscular. Thus, laboratories spawned the brain versus brawn (or white versus black) dichotomy that is still prevalent in many circles. Australia’s Indigenous people (“Australoids”) had less skull volume than any other people, and were ascribed as having even more reduced capacities—a furphy propagated in Australian school texts until the 1980s.[C7]Colin Tatz, “Teaching About Genocide,” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 241-2.

Tatz cites no actual evidence to contradict this “furphy,” and conveniently ignores more recent and precise measures of skull volume including seven studies showing the average brain size of Aborigines is significantly smaller that Europeans (brain size being correlated with IQ at approximately 0.4). The most authoritative study of Aboriginal brain size is that of Smith and Beals (1990) which gave a brain size difference of 144cc. or about 10 per cent. Tatz also completely rejects the validity of IQ testing, including the Stanford-Binet intelligence test which he claims is “still in use, or misuse, today for streaming children into different levels of education, for separating classes of people, the bright from the simple, and so on.” He contends that, “No matter what spin one puts on modern IQ testing, it remains of the same genre and ‘scientific’ validity as skull measuring.”[C8]Ibid., 242.
(Colin Tatz, “Teaching About Genocide,” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 241-2.)
For Tatz, IQ tests were developed as part of the conspiracy by White supremacists in the U.S. to create a society that was White and Protestant and excluded Jews and Blacks.[C9]Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 892.

Such sophistry emanates from a man extolled by a colleague for his “fierce fidelity to truth,” a trait that has “won him a well-deserved international reputation as an intellectual,” and has “attracted the toxic enmity of those who have a vested interest in untruth.”[C10]Douglas Booth, “Colin Tatz: ‘Compelled to Repair a Flawed World,’” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 16. Tatz aptly characterizes his own egregious denial of racial differences in intelligence in noting that “individuals and collectives usually know (or can reasonably infer) a great deal more than they’re prepared to acknowledge. Denialist discourses present accounts of circumstances in question that obliterate or falsify their actual character. … The common technique is quintessentially assertion and contention rather than any attempt at demonstration or affirmation of their viewpoints.[C11]Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 2146. He shares this trait with fellow Jewish academic and “Stolen Generations” propagandist, Robert Manne, who, as historian Bain Attwood has pointed out, “asserts rather than argues.”[C12]Bain Attwood, The Stolen Generations and Genocide, 166.

Dismissing over a century of psychometric evidence showing a gulf in mean IQ between White Australians and Aborigines allows Tatz to ascribe the dismal state of Aboriginal communities exclusively to White malevolence. He even makes the laughable claim that, prior to the 1960s, “Aborigines were, in general, the most law-abiding sector of the Australian population,” whereas now they would have to be “considered, statistically, to be the most criminal population on the planet.”[C13]Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 1343. Indeed, he claims, “as more education, training and intervention programs are established, so more and more youth are imprisoned. Some 28 percent of all prisoners in custody are Aboriginal, a figure that brands them as the world’s foremost criminals.”[C14]Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 355. The link between low intelligence and a greater propensity for violent crime has been well established by criminological research.

A study recently published in the British Medical Journal by Australian researchers found, in a study of about 100 young people aged 10–17 incarcerated in Western Australia (which has a very high Aboriginal prison population), 89 per cent had at least one area of severe neurodevelopmental impairment, such as problems with memory, cognition or motors skills. The study found about a quarter were found to have to have an intellectual disability, with an IQ score at or below 70. The director of the study, Carol Bower, noted that “Almost half the young people had severe problems with language, how to listen and reply and explain what they think.”

Denial of the anthropological record

In his risible claim that Aborigines were once “the most law-abiding sector of the Australian population,” Tatz disregards anthropological evidence showing Aboriginal societies were, prior to contact with Europeans, extremely abusive to women and children and generally violent. In 1995 paleopathologist Stephen Webb published his analysis of 4500 individuals’ bones from mainland Australia going back 50,000 years. These bone collections were at the time being handed over to Aboriginal communities for re-burial, which stopped any follow-up studies.

He found highly disproportionate rates of injuries and fractures to women’s skulls, with the injuries suggesting deliberate attack and often attacks from behind, perhaps from domestic squabbles. In the tropics, for example, female head injury frequency was about 20–33%, versus 6.5–26% for males. The most extreme results were on the south coast, from Swanport and Adelaide, with female cranial trauma rates as high as 40–44%—two to four times the rate of male cranial trauma. In desert and south coast areas, 5–6% of female skulls had three separate head injuries, and 11–12% had two injuries.

The high rate of injuries to female heads was very different from the results from studies of other peoples. His findings, according to anthropologist Peter Sutton, confirm that serious armed assaults were common in Australia over thousands of years prior to the arrival of Europeans.

From British settlement in 1788, Europeans arriving in Australia were shocked at the extreme physical violence Aboriginal men inflicted on their women. Watkin Tench, a British marine officer who arrived on the First Fleet, noticed a young woman’s head “covered by contusions, and mangled by scars.” She had a spear wound above her left knee caused by a man who dragged her home to rape her. Tench wrote: “They are in all respects treated with savage barbarity; condemned not only to carry the children, but all other burthens. They meet in return for submission only with blows, kicks and every other mark of brutality.”[C15]Nowra, Bad Dreaming: Aboriginal Men’s Violence Against Women & Children (Melbourne: Pluto Press, 2007), 10. Tench observed that when an Aboriginal man “is provoked by a woman, he either spears her, or knocks her down on the spot; on this occasion he always strikes on the head, using indiscriminately a hatchet, a club, or any other weapon, which may chance to be in his hand.” British soldier William Collins recounted how “We have seen some of these unfortunate beings with more scars upon their shorn heads, cut in every direction, than could be well distinguished or counted.”[C16]Peter Sutton, The Politics of Suffering: Indigenous Australia and the End of the Liberal Consensus (Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press, 2009), 100.

Watkin Tench
Watkin Tench

In 1802 an explorer in the Blue Mountains in New South Wales wrote how, for a trivial reason, an Aboriginal “took his club and struck his wife’s head such a blow that she fell to the ground unconscious. After dinner … he got infuriated and again struck his wife on the head with his club, and left her on the ground nearly dying.”[C17]Nowra, Bad Dreaming, 13. In 1825, the French explorer Louis-Antoine de Bougainville observed that “that young girls are brutally kidnapped from their families, violently dragged to isolated spots and are ravished after being subjected to a good deal of cruelty.”[C18]Joan Kimm, A Fatal Conjunction: Two Laws Two Cultures (Sydney: Federation Press, 2004), 76.

George Robinson observed in the 1830s that Aboriginal men in Tasmania “courted” their women by stabbing them with sharp sticks and cutting them with knives prior to rape.[C19]Nowra, Bad Dreaming, 12. A contemporaneous account by an ex-convict named Lingard noted that: “I scarcely ever saw a married woman, but she had got six or seven cuts in her head, given by her husband with a tomahawk, several inches in length and very deep.”[C20]Ibid., 12.
(Nowra, Bad Dreaming, 12.)
Explorer Edward John Eyre similarly observed that “women are often sadly ill-treated by their husbands and friends. … They are frequently beaten about the head, with waddies [clubs], in the most dreadful manner, or speared in the limbs for the most trivial offences. … Few women will be found, upon examination, to be free from frightful scars upon their head, or the marks of spear wounds about the body. I have seen a young woman, who, from the number of these marks, appeared to have been riddled with spear wounds.”[C21]Stephanie Jarrett, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence (Victoria: Ballan, 2013), 123.

Tribal warfare and paybacks were endemic among Aborigines. The anthropologist T.G.H. Strehlow witnessed a battle in 1875 in Central Australia which was triggered by a perceived sacrilege: “The warriors turned their murderous attention to the women and older children and either clubbed or speared them to death. Finally, according to the grim custom of warriors and avengers they broke the limbs of the infants, leaving them to die ‘natural deaths.’” The final number of the dead could well have reached the high figure of 80 to 100 men, women and children. Subsequent revenge killings by the victims’ clan amounted to more than 60 people.[C22]website

Respected historian Geoffrey Blainey estimated that annual death rates among Aboriginal tribes in the Port Phillip Bay area were comparable with countries involved in the two world wars. A tribe in Arnhem Land in Northern Australia was so violent in the 1920s it could be placed among the world’s most lethal societies, with a homicide rate of at least 300 per 100,000 (which Stephanie Jarrett, in her book Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence, suggests could be grossly under-estimated). This is over three times that of the country with the highest homicide rate in the world in 2017 (El Salvador at 82.84 homicides per 100,000), and almost three times that of the city with the highest homicide rate in the world in 2017 (Los Cabos in Mexico at 111.33 homicides per 100,000).

William Buckley
William Buckley

Escaped convict William Buckley, who lived for over three decades with an Aboriginal tribe around Port Phillip Bay in present-day Victoria in the early nineteenth century, witnessed constant raids, ambushes and massacres. Buckley noted how the Watouronga tribe of Geelong in night raids “destroyed without mercy men, women and children.”

Buckley also described the practice of cannibalism between the warring tribes of the area, including the practice of eating flesh from the legs of slain warriors which “was greedily devoured by these savages.” He mentions their practice of mortuary cannibalism for love, relating that “they eat also the flesh of their own children to whom they have been much attached should they die a natural death,” and described how:

They have a brutal aversion to children who happen to be deformed at their birth. I saw the brains of one dashed out at a blow, and a boy belonging to the same woman made to eat the mangled remains. The act of cannibalism was accounted for in this way. The woman at particular seasons of the moon, was out of her senses; the moon—as they thought—having affected the child also; and certainly it had a very singular appearance. This caused the husband to deny his being the father, and the reason given for making the boy eat the child was, that some evil would befall him of he had not done so.[C23]William Buckley, The Life and Adventures of William Buckley: Thirty-Two Years a Wanderer Amongst the Aborigines of the Then Unexplored Country Round Port Phillip, Now the Province of Victoria (Hobart: Archibald MacDougall, 1852), 66-7.

Tatz ignores Buckley’s detailed eyewitness account of Aboriginal cannibalism, falsely claiming that “we do not have a single eyewitness account of Aboriginal cannibalism.” When the Australian politician Pauline Hanson referred to the Aboriginal practice of cannibalism in 1997, an incensed Tatz equated it with “the blood libel against the Jews,” claiming “the Hanson vilification about cannibalism is not of the same magnitude or consequence, but it is very much in the same genre.”[C24]Raphael Israeli, The Blood Libel and Its Derivatives: The Scourge of Anti-Semitism (London: Routledge, 2017), 4.

The anthropological record totally undermines Tatz’s preferred narrative that the current epidemic of violence in Aboriginal communities is an historical aberration that can be attributed to their “genocide” and victimization at the hands of Whites. The above referenced Stephanie Jarrett notes that violence and abuse against women and children in Aboriginal communities are currently at “catastrophic levels” and that “It is important to acknowledge [the] link between today’s Aboriginal violence and violent, pre-contact tradition, because until policymakers are honest in their assessment of the causes, Aboriginal people can never be liberated from violence. … Deep cultural change is necessary, away from traditional norms and practices of violence.”[C25]Jarrett, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence, 1. Aboriginal woman Bess Price, in her forward to Jarrett’s book pointed out that “my own body is scarred by domestic violence” and noted that “Aboriginal people have to acknowledge the truth. We can’t blame all of our problems on the white man.”[C26]Ibid., 291.
(Jarrett, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence, 1.)

The late political cartoonist Bill Leak drops a truth bomb
The late political cartoonist Bill Leak drops a truth bomb

Given the anthropological record, it is hardly surprising that today’s Aborigines are ten times more likely to commit homicide than Europeans and are ten to fifteen times more likely to commit a serious assault. The latest statistics from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare show that Aboriginal women are 32 times more likely than non-Aboriginal women to be hospitalized because of family violence. Similarly, Aboriginal men are 23 times more likely to be hospitalized. Two in five homicide victims (41 percent) were killed by a current or former partner, compared with one in five homicide victims. Aboriginal communities suffer Australia’s worst rates of family violence, which are causing Aboriginal women to be hospitalized at 35 times the rate of non-Aboriginal women. Aborigines are, consequently, vastly overrepresented in Australia’s prison population.

It is common to blame White Australia for this astounding level of incarceration. Richard Lynn cites an Australian sociologist who argues that “the key general cause of the perceived criminalisation of Aborigines is universally perceived to be socioeconomic deprivation and consequential exclusion” and that “the underlying issues of unemployment, poverty, ill-health, dispossession, and disenfranchisement are the causes of the over-involvement of Aborigines in prison” and that these are themselves “the product of indirect discrimination.” Lynn notes wryly that: “Thus it is the Europeans who are responsible for the high crime rates of the Aborigines.”[C27]Ibid. p. 56
(Jarrett, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence, 1.)

Part Four

The “Stolen Generations”

Colin Tatz has made the “Stolen Generations” the lynchpin of the “genocide” charge he levels against White Australia. The myth of the “Stolen Generations” was born in 1981 with the publication of a short pamphlet by a postgraduate history student, Peter Read, who argued that part-Aboriginal children were systematically removed to separate them from the rest of their race, claiming that “welfare officers, removing children solely because they were Aboriginal, intended and arranged that they should lose their Aboriginality, and that they should never return home.” He based this controversial thesis on interviews with Aborigines about their experiences with the welfare system, and his research into the New South Wales official records, from which he asserted that 5,625, or up to one in six Aboriginal children had been taken in New South Wales with the intent of permanent removal from their culture between 1883 and 1969.

Read, who wrote his pamphlet “at white heat in a single day,” initially wanted to call it “The Lost Generations” but his wife thought this too bland and suggested the more polemical “Stolen Generations.” Following its enthusiastic reception on the radical Left, Read, who later became Professor of History at the University of Sydney, hardened his thesis to claim Australian authorities sought not just to end Aboriginal culture, but to physically eliminate Aborigines altogether: “Their extinction, it seemed, would not occur naturally after all, but would have to be arranged.” In later writings, he drew an explicit analogy between the “Stolen Generations” and “the Holocaust.”[D1]Keith Windschuttle, The Fabrication of Aboriginal History: The Stolen Generations (Sydney: Macleay Press, 2009), 61.

Read’s thesis was the default assumption for the polemical Bringing Them Home report of 1997, the result of an inquiry by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, which claimed that, in various parts of the country, up to one in five Aboriginal children were forcibly removed from their families during the sixty years prioe to 1970. This report relied on the anonymous and unverified testimony of people claiming to have been affected by removals. Echoing the later pamphlet by Read, a finding of genocide was presented: the removals were intended to “absorb,” “merge” and “assimilate” the children, “so that Aborigines as a distinct group would disappear.” It urged the federal government to apologize and offer compensation to the alleged victims and their families.

In 2008, then Prime Minister Kevin Rudd issued a formal apology, declaring “for the removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families, their communities, and their country. For the pain, suffering and hurt of these Stolen Generations, their descendants and for their families left behind, we say sorry.”

Two decades after the publication of Read’s pamphlet, historian Keith Windschuttle took the trouble to examine all 1,200 pages of records Read claimed to have studied, and found his research and conclusions, the two foundational props of the Stolen Generations myth, were filled with errors and distortions.[D2]Ibid., 76.
(Keith Windschuttle, The Fabrication of Aboriginal History: The Stolen Generations (Sydney: Macleay Press, 2009), 61.)
Tatz’s response to this devastating critique of Read’s figures and methodology is to label Windschuttle a “denier,” and insist “debates about quantification in genocide context are not a key issue. The fulcrum is intent, and the nature of the act(s) rather than raw numbers or percentages.”[D3]Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 1916. Thus, when the alleged actions that form the basis of the “Stolen Generations” charge are shown to bogus, Tatz resorts to arguing this is ultimately irrelevant because “intent” is sufficient for the charge to be levelled: “Did such actions occur? In any discussion of genocide, the intent rather than the motive and the actual outcome is all that matters.”[D4]Ibid., 1952.
(Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 1916.)

Tatz continues to cite Read’s pamphlet as a trusted source, and to assert that Aboriginal children were removed as part of a genocidal policy of assimilating them into the White Australian population. He also continues to recycle the totally discredited claim that 100,000 part-Aboriginal children were removed even though fellow “Stolen Generations” propagandist Robert Manne acknowledges the 100,000 number, contained in the Bringing Them Home report, is entirely spurious, the result of a journalist’s misunderstanding of an observation by Peter Read but then uncritically recycled during in the Bringing Them Home report, and repeated on many occasions since.[D5]See Bain Attwood, “The Stolen Generations and genocide: Robert Manne’s In Denial: The Stolen Generations and the Right,” Aboriginal History, Vol. 25 (Sydney: 2001), 255-56.

After carefully combing through the public records, Windschuttle put the total number of Aboriginal children taken into care from 1880 to 1970 in all states and territories of Australia at 8,250. This figure includes children fostered or adopted into White families, those forcibly or voluntarily separated from their parents for good (and sometimes bad) reasons, those sent with parents’ consent to be educated and trained elsewhere, and those taken away because they were neglected or abused by their parents.[D6]Windschuttle, The Fabrication of Aboriginal History, 617. Windschuttle found no evidence of any policy by any state or federal government to steal children from parents to eliminate the Aboriginal race.

Despite Windschuttle’s debunking of the “Stolen Generations” myth, Tatz continues to assert that Aboriginal child removals, rather than motivated by concerns for child welfare, were prompted by White authorities responding to its “Aboriginal problem” by finding a “solution in biology” based on “the forcible removal of Aboriginal children from their parents, and their subsequent assimilation by intermarriage into white society.”[D7]Quoted in: Douglas Booth, “Colin Tatz: ‘Compelled to Repair a Flawed World,’” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 14. To support this contention, he cites a handful of statements made by White Australian clergymen and bureaucrats at various points in the twentieth century, such as a brief statement from a national summit at Canberra in 1937 that: “The destiny of the natives of Aboriginal origin, but not of full blood, lies in their ultimate absorption by the people of the Commonwealth and it is therefore recommended that all efforts shall be directed to this end.”[D8]Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 1874.

Tatz takes for granted the desire expressed in this and similar statements (to assimilate mixed-descent Aborigines into the White Australian population) is “genocidal,” claiming that such ideas “go to the heart of genocidal thought and action, resorting to biological solutions to social and racial problems.”[D9] He also regards historical laws banning Aboriginal intermarriage with Europeans as a viciously racist “intrusion into marriage and sexual relations.”[D10]Ibid., 1612.
(Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 1874.)
White Australians are thus condemned for promoting the genetic assimilation of Aborigines and for preventing it.

Despite the statements Tatz cites as evidence to support his genocide charge, there is no evidence such views ever gained wide support or were translated into government policy. Historian Bain Attwood notes how “these statements of intent” are invariably “mistaken for action(s)” by the likes of Tatz and Manne who, in their writings, seem to assume the espousers of such views “won broad acceptance for their eugenicist policies and were able to implement them,” when the reality is that “a close reading of the historical record of actions does not support this claim.”[D11]Attwood, “The Stolen Generations and genocide,” 169.

Despite their strident claims, Tatz and Manne have, as conservative journalist Andrew Bolt repeatedly points out, been unable to identify even ten children “stolen” just for being Aboriginal. The judiciary in the Northern Territory has been unable to find any evidence of a “stolen generation,” despite a huge test case and subsequent appeal. Activist lawyers picked Lorna Cubillo and Peter Gunner as their first and best two claimants from among 550 people in the Northern Territory who registered with them as having been “stolen” for being Aboriginal. The Howard government in power at the time fought the claims and won. The Federal Court in 2000 found that Gunner had been sent to Alice Springs by his mother for schooling, and Cubillo had been rescued from a bush camp where she was found abandoned by her father, her mother dead and her grandmother far away. Witnesses in the case who also signed up were all shown not to have been “stolen.”

Professor Robert Manne
Professor Robert Manne

After going through the records of Aboriginal policy in the Northern Territory, the judge ruled that the “evidence does not support a finding that there was any policy of removal of part-Aboriginal children such as that alleged by the applicants. That finding was upheld on appeal and no evidence to the contrary has emerged since that finding. Court cases in Western Australia and South Australia have likewise found no proof children were “stolen” from their families just for being Aboriginal, rather than for being abandoned or abused. Those claiming to be “stolen” have, on closer checking, turned out to have been rescued instead—just as authorities still rescue Aboriginal children today.

Tatz claims in his book Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide that officials in Victoria in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries used their “powers to remove children of mixed descent, to absorb them physically and culturally and so end their Aboriginality” with between 20,000 and 35,000 children taken away “to institutions to extinguish their Aboriginality” and that this “became a cornerstone of action by state and federal administrators.”[D12]Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 1844. He neglects to mention that the Victorian Labor government was informed by its specially appointed Stolen Generations Taskforce in 2003 that while some 36 organizations were now helping the state’s “stolen generations,” not one truly “stolen” child could be found. In fact, the Aboriginal-led taskforce admitted that in the entire history of Victoria there had been “no formal policy for removing children.”

In Western Australia, a Supreme Court judge rejected claims there was ever any official program in the state to implement a “Stolen Generations” policy of forced assimilation into the White Australian community. Justice Pritchard dismissed damages claims by the Aborigines Don and Sylvia Collard and seven of their 14 children removed or made state wards. She specifically dealt with a claim that the children were removed “pursuant to a policy of assimilation of aboriginal children,” instead finding they were removed to safeguard their physical welfare, finding “the references to ‘assimilation’ in the evidence I have set out above are not sufficient to support a finding on the balance of probabilities that at the time of the wardships there was, within the Department of Native Welfare or the Child Welfare Department, the pursuit of a policy of assimilation of aboriginal people into white Australian society through the wardship of aboriginal children.”

In truth, the so-called “Stolen Generations” saved thousands of children from systematic abuse, neglect and molestation. Figures released in 2016 by the Australian government Institute for Family Studies show that nearly 17,000 Aboriginal children are in out-of-home care, up 65 percent since former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s apology to the “Stolen Generations” in 2008. Reflecting on these figures, an incensed Greens MP recently declared: “It’s just ludicrous. Saying sorry (for the ‘Stolen Generations’), say you’re not going to do it again, and we still continue to see our children being ripped out of mothers’ arms.” The ABC interviewed a “stolen generations survivor” who likewise complained that this alleged child-stealing was still happening: “They have to stop taking our kids.” The ABC failed to explain that these children—like the “stolen generations” before them—were taken to save them from being neglected, starved, bashed or raped. Aboriginal children are today five times more likely to be hospitalized for assault and almost ten times more likely to be taken into care.

“Justification of genocidal practices”

Tatz labels any justification for the removal of Aboriginal children on welfare grounds as “lame attempts at justification of genocidal practices.” Nor, apparently, does it concern him that the “Stolen Generations” myth he so zealously propagates is killing Aboriginal children today by making authorities reluctant to save Aboriginal children from dangers that would once have prompted immediate intervention. The “Stolen Generations” myth necessitates denying that Aboriginal children are being removed today for good reasons as this implicitly concedes that the “Stolen Generations” were very likely removed for good reasons too. The results of this particularly noxious brand of anti-White activism are truly horrific for Aboriginal children today.

Earlier this year, the Northern Territory’s child protection minister refused to rule out allowing a toddler who had been raped in a suburban home in an Aboriginal community in Tennant Creek from returning to the same house where the rape had occurred. The house was in an area locals call “The Bronx,” notorious for alcohol-fueled violence. A subsequent investigation found the girl, who was infected with a sexually transmitted disease, was raped in an entirely foreseeable attack. Child protection services received 52 reports on the children in the family documenting “all possible harm types” including experiences of, and exposure to, domestic violence and parental substance abuse, truancy, neglect, emotional harm, physical harm and sexual abuse of children. Police had 150 “recorded interactions” with the child’s parents and siblings. Only after being raped was the child and her brother removed from their mother’s care by the Department of Child Protection South Australia.

In Queensland, officials took an Aboriginal girl from her White foster parents and returned her to the dysfunctional Aurukun Aboriginal community, where she was pack-raped again.

An epidemic of similar cases in Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory necessitated a direct military intervention by the Howard government over a decade ago. A long-serving pediatrician who worked in Alice Springs in the Northern Territory, Tors Clothier, notes that child abuse is rife in remote Aboriginal communities and doubts many Aboriginal females made it to puberty without experiencing unwanted sexual attention: “Abuse is rife. I thought vividly of the case of a seven-month-old child who was badly raped years ago and died from her injuries. My impression was that sexual and physical abuse of children was common.” Clothier said that during his long career he had become increasingly frustrated with the reluctance of child protection services to protect at-risk children: “Clearly with the spectre of the Stolen Generations hanging in the background, people are reluctant to take away kids. … The children that were being injured or neglected or physically abused were not at the apex of the triangle where they should have been.”

The Australian recently reported that “Child protection authorities are overwhelmed by the scale of neglect and under-reported sexual activity involving children in the Northern Territory, which has seen rates of sexually transmitted infections soar over the past decade.” In the decade between 2006 and 2016, “the numbers of notified cases of childhood STIs rose by as much as 180 percent for some diseases. Underage Aboriginal girls are now almost 60 times more likely to contract syphilis than their non-Aboriginal counterparts and 30 times more likely to contract gonorrhea or trichomoniasis, according to official figures.” These figures reveal the horrifying extent of child sexual abuse in Aboriginal communities. Aboriginal men made up two-thirds of all those charged in the Northern Territory with child sexual offences over the past ten years, despite Aboriginal people only comprising one-third of the Territory’s population.

Former Northern Territory child protection minister John Elferink has attacked agencies who, because of the “Stolen Generations” myth, are now reluctant to remove at-risk children, noting how “On one occasion I had to support my department CEO’s sacking of a manager because that manager endorsed an underage marriage rather than protect the child because the manager unilaterally decided it was culturally acceptable. Sadly, kinship care as a concept has decayed into simply making excuses for child abuse for cultural reasons. Genital mutilation is one such example.”

Tatz slams politicians and bureaucrats for banning Aboriginal rituals like circumcision and subincision [the slitting open of the male urethra] and child marriage, which he regards as unwarranted intrusions into traditional Aboriginal culture which he regards as having “world’s best practices in terms of child-rearing.”[D13]Ibid.,1742.
(Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 1844.)
Among these “world’s best practices” banned by the White authorities was the practice of the “intercision of the girls at the age of puberty. The vagina is cut with glass by the old men, and that involves a great deal of suffering.”[D14]Windschuttle, The Fabrication of Aboriginal History, 464.

The Australian recently observed how that “the shadow cast by the Stolen Generations has meant authorities (not only in the Territory) are extremely reluctant to remove at-risk children from their families, and preferred placement with relatives may not eliminate the risk.” Aboriginal woman Jacinta Price noted that “Many of us who have known of the sex abuse horrors for years have been trying to reveal the truth while others while others have attempted to shut us down. Claims of ‘racism’ and ‘impacts of colonisation’ have been the easy distraction from this disgraceful situation, which is all too prevalent in some Aboriginal communities.”

None of this dissuades Tatz from opposing the removal of Aboriginal children from dangerous homes. Instead he maintains that:

The paradigm of Aboriginal families as sites of danger and risk for their children continues to be rolled out to endorse ongoing removals and to raise public support for stricter levels of government intervention and management, ostensibly to improve health and wellbeing. The Federal Government used allegations that child sexual abuse was rife in Indigenous communities to validate the invasive actions of the Northern Territory Intervention. The West Australian government made similar claims in threatening to close up to 150 communities. The forced removal of Aboriginal children remains an integral process of the Australian settler colony.

This shift has been accompanied by greater prevalence of populist racist characterisations of neglect and abuse as pertaining to cultural and individual Indigenous deficits rather than founded in colonial experiences and systemic disadvantage. Fears of so-called problem populations—Indigenous, ethnic, refugees and asylum seekers—threaten national security and peace. Global terrorism generates dehumanising of “problem populations” and support for harsh solutions that hark back to carceral institutions for Indigenous populations in settler colonial states.[15]

Instead of being “founded in colonial experiences and systemic disadvantage,” the anthropological evidence shows that extreme physical and sexual abuse of women and children was a normative part of pre-contact Aboriginal culture. Historian John Kimm points out that “the sexual use of young girls by older men, indeed often much older men, was an intrinsic part of Aboriginal culture, a heritage that cannot easily be denied.”[D16]A Fatal Conjunction: Two Laws Two Cultures (Sydney: Federation Press, 2004), 24. Playwright and author Louis Nowra concurs: “Despite local variation, there is a consistent pattern of Aboriginal men’s treatment of women that was harsh, sexually aggressive (gang-rape for instance) and, in our term, misogynist. Given its pervasive nature across the whole of Australia, we can say that it was ancient and long-lasting.”[D17]Nowra, Bad Dreaming: Aboriginal Men’s Violence Against Women & Children (Melbourne: Pluto Press, 2007), 24.

Nowra cites an anthropologist in Queensland who described how, at the turn of the twentieth century when a girl of the Pitta-Pitta tribe first showed signs of puberty, “several men would drag her into the bush and forcibly enlarge her vaginal orifice by tearing it downwards with the first three fingers wound round and round with opossum string. Other men come forward from all directions, and the struggling victim has to submit in rotation to promiscuous coition with all the ‘bucks’ present.” Even worse was his description of practices around Glenormiston in Victoria, where: “A group of men, with cooperation from old women, ambush a young woman, and pin her so an old man can slit up the shrieking girl’s perineum with a stone knife, followed by sweeping three fingers round the inside of the vaginal orifice. She is next compelled to undergo copulation with all the bucks present; again the same night, and a third time, on the following morning.”[18]

In traditional Aboriginal culture there are no age restrictions at which a girl would be delivered up to a much older man, and it was not an “uncommon occurrence to see an individual carrying on his shoulder his little child-wife who is perhaps too tired to toddle any further.” In 1905 the local telegraph operator in Queensland reported that a five-year old half-caste girl, Polly, was taken by an Aboriginal man who, with others, raped her over two days. The operator noted that such actions “are very common among the men.”[D19]Windschuttle, The Fabrication of Aboriginal History, 443.

John Elferink observes that too many children were being “left in harm’s way because we have become gun-shy of trampling on culture” by removing them: “if we accept the notion that cultural practices justify the suspension of the human rights of a child then we need to be prepared to accept that we support the notion that children will be in sexual relationships.”

Conclusion

The decades-long propagation of the genocide charge against White Australians by Tony Barta, Colin Tatz and a phalanx of other Jewish academics and intellectuals is an especially pernicious example of Jewish ethnic warfare through the construction of culture—in this case Australia’s historical narrative. In levelling the “genocide” charge these ethnic activists seek to exercise the kind of psychological leverage that has been used with such devastating effect against generations of Germans and the West in general (e.g., in the UK, the legacy of slavery and colonialism; in the U.S., the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow laws). This is evident in their willingness to liken rejection of, or even ambivalence toward, their tendentious assertion that “Australia is a nation built on genocide” to “Holocaust denial.” This inculcation of guilt among White Australian for their supposed “genocide” of Aborigines is ultimately about suppressing opposition to non-White immigration and multiculturalism—policies that have the universal support of Australia’s Jewish activist organizations.

Given Tatz’s fervent support for Israel, despite that nation’s history of ethnic cleansing and harshly restrictive policies against all non-Jewish migrants and refugees, his sanctimonious words about the alleged historical sins and moral failings of White Australians are exposed for what they are: a mask for Jewish ethnic aggression against a feared and reviled outgroup. He informs his readers that if his “writing comes across as passionate, so be it,” insisting there “can be no dispassion in matters of race, let alone genocide.”[D20]Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 104. While blatant activism should evoke discomfort in the academy—given its incompatibility with detached reflection and scholarly objectivity and integrity, Tatz is unusually upfront about his agenda: “My bias is clear,” he affirms in Obstacle Race, his major treatise on the racism that is supposedly ubiquitous in Australian sport: “it is pro-Aboriginal in most things and anti-racist [i.e., anti-White] in all things.”[D21]Colin Tatz, Obstacle Race: Aborigines in Sport (Sydney: UNSW Press, 1995), 8.

Observing how ethic activism permeates Tatz’s work, Tony Barta notes how he has made “everything he wrote a political intervention. He made sport an activist concept. He made Aboriginal Affairs an activist site.”[D22]Douglas Booth, “Colin Tatz: ‘Compelled to Repair a Flawed World,’” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 14. One Jewish source implicitly acknowledges the truth: that Tatz is not an objective, truth-seeking academic but a shameless ethnic activist and anti-White propagandist. He “does not pretend to be detached,” and beneath the thin veneer of scholarly objectivity, “the emotion ripples.” This emotion leads him to dismiss all inconvenient facts which undermine the anti-White narrative he has assiduously constructed: the extremely low mean IQ of Australia’s Aborigines, their pre-contact history of extreme violence and sexual assault (especially against women and children), and the real reasons for Aboriginal child removals in the twentieth century. Given the suffering of Aboriginal children not removed from their families because of this activism, it’s clear that Tatz does not even have the best interests of the Aborigines at heart.

Tatz lets the truth be damned and instead propagates “noble lies” intended to make White Australian feel guilty and Aborigines feel good by blaming their endemic dysfunction on Whites. This tactic is motivated by the Marxist-Leninist principle that the end justifies the means. As the goal of overthrowing the White racial and cultural domination in Australia is held to be a moral imperative that trumps literally everything else—even the interests of many of the supposed beneficiaries of this activism—presenting blatantly false accounts as authentic history, anthropology, and sociology is held to be morally justified. Consistent with the postmodernist argument that truth is only true when it benefits non-White minority groups, false accounts are not false if they contribute to the anti-White narrative and nurture White guilt and serve Jewish interests. The history of the genocide charge against White Australia, and its increasingly pernicious cultural and political ramifications, is a salutary lesson in the dangers of ceding control of people’s historical narrative to a hostile outgroup.

Footnotes

[A1] Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 251.

[A2] Tony Barta, “Realities, Surrealities and the Membrane of Innocence,” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 161.

[A3] A. Francis Johnson, Australian Fiction as Archival Salvage: Making and Unmaking the Postcolonial Novel (Boston: Brill Rodopi, 2016), 198.

[A4] A. Dirk Moses, “Genocide and Settler Society in Australian History” In: Genocide and Settler Society: Frontier Violence and Stolen Indigenous Children in Australian History, Ed. A. Dirk Moses (Sydney: Berghahn Books, 2004), 26.

[A5] Tony Barta, Relations of Genocide: Land and Lives in the Colonisation of Australia (Los Angeles: Sage, 2008) 239-40.

[A6] Ibid., 238; 174.

[A7] Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 251-52.

[A8] Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 499.

[A9] Colin Tatz, With Intent to Destroy: Reflecting on Genocide (London; Verso, 2003), xvi.

[A10] Barta, “Realities, Surrealities and the Membrane of Innocence,” 173-4.

[A11] Ibid., 66.

[A12] Ibid., 66-7.

[A13] Tatz, With Intent to Destroy, xiii; xvi.

[A14] Chris Mitchell, “A critic untroubled by facts who seeks to silence dissent,” The Australian (Sydney, September 17, 2011).

[A15] Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 3009.

[A16] Tatz, With Intent to Destroy, xiii.

[A17] Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 261.

[A18] Ibid., 356.

[A19] Tatz, With Intent to Destory, xvi.

[A20] Marcus Einfeld, “We Too Have Been Strangers: Jews and the Refugee Struggle,” In: New Under the Sun — Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski (Melbourne: Black Inc., 2006), 311 & 314.

[B1] Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 347.

[B2] Ibid., 345.

[B3] Ibid., 5.

[B4] Ibid., 345.

[B5] Ibid., 346.

[B6] Ibid., 348.

[B7] Ibid., 16.

[B8] Ibid., 15.

[B9] Ibid., 35; 36.

[B10] Ibid., 5.

[B11] Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 2181.

[B12] Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 58.

[B13] Ibid., 55.

[B14] Ibid., 52.

[B15] Ibid.,11.

[B16] Colin Tatz, With Intent to Destroy: Reflecting on Genocide (London; Verso, 2003), 4.

[B17] Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 107.

[B18] Tatz, With Intent to Destroy, 7.

[B19] Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 101.

[B20] Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 108.

[B21] Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 217.

[B22] Ibid., 219.

[B23] Ibid., 306.

[B24] Ibid., 350.

[B25] Ibid.

[B26] Ibid., 349.

[B27] Ibid., 56.

[B28] Ibid., 113.

[B29] Ibid., 116.

[B30] Ibid., 154.

[B31] Ibid.

[B32] Ibid., 154-5

[B33] Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 490.

[B34] Douglas Booth “Colin Tatz: Compelled to Repair a Flawed World” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 7.

[B35] Colin Tatz & Winton Higgins, The Magnitude of Genocide, (Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2016), xii.

[B36] Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 22.

[B37] Ibid., 359.

[B38] Ibid., 305

[B39] Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 3210-3211.

[B40] Tatz, With Intent to Destroy: Reflecting on Genocide, xvii.

[B41] Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 340-41.

[C1] Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 347.

[C2] Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 1772.

[C3] Ibid., 3169.

[C4] Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 355.

[C5] Richard Lynn, The Global Bell Curve (Washington Summit, 2010), 47-8.

[C6] Ibid., 48.

[C7] Colin Tatz, “Teaching About Genocide,” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 241-2.

[C8] Ibid., 242.

[C9] Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 892.

[C10] Douglas Booth, “Colin Tatz: ‘Compelled to Repair a Flawed World,’” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 16.

[C11] Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 2146.

[C12] Bain Attwood, The Stolen Generations and Genocide, 166.

[C13] Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 1343.

[C14] Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 355.

[C15] Nowra, Bad Dreaming: Aboriginal Men’s Violence Against Women & Children (Melbourne: Pluto Press, 2007), 10.

[C16] Peter Sutton, The Politics of Suffering: Indigenous Australia and the End of the Liberal Consensus (Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press, 2009), 100.

[C17] Nowra, Bad Dreaming, 13.

[C18] Joan Kimm, A Fatal Conjunction: Two Laws Two Cultures (Sydney: Federation Press, 2004), 76.

[C19] Nowra, Bad Dreaming, 12.

[C20] Ibid., 12.

[C21] Stephanie Jarrett, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence (Victoria: Ballan, 2013), 123.

[C22] website

[C23] William Buckley, The Life and Adventures of William Buckley: Thirty-Two Years a Wanderer Amongst the Aborigines of the Then Unexplored Country Round Port Phillip, Now the Province of Victoria (Hobart: Archibald MacDougall, 1852), 66-7.

[C24] Raphael Israeli, The Blood Libel and Its Derivatives: The Scourge of Anti-Semitism (London: Routledge, 2017), 4.

[C25] Jarrett, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence, 1.

[C26] Ibid., 291.

[C27] Ibid. p. 56

[D1] Keith Windschuttle, The Fabrication of Aboriginal History: The Stolen Generations (Sydney: Macleay Press, 2009), 61.

[D2] Ibid., 76.

[D3] Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 1916.

[D4] Ibid., 1952.

[D5] See Bain Attwood, “The Stolen Generations and genocide: Robert Manne’s In Denial: The Stolen Generations and the Right,” Aboriginal History, Vol. 25 (Sydney: 2001), 255-56.

[D6] Windschuttle, The Fabrication of Aboriginal History, 617.

[D7] Quoted in: Douglas Booth, “Colin Tatz: ‘Compelled to Repair a Flawed World,’” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 14.

[D8] Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 1874.

[9] Ibid., 1880.

[D10] Ibid., 1612.

[D11] Attwood, “The Stolen Generations and genocide,” 169.

[D12] Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 1844.

[D13] Ibid.,1742.

[D14] Windschuttle, The Fabrication of Aboriginal History, 464.

[D15] Quoted in: Anna Haebich, “Reflecting on the Bringing Them Home Report,” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017),40-41.

[D16] A Fatal Conjunction: Two Laws Two Cultures (Sydney: Federation Press, 2004), 24.

[D17] Nowra, Bad Dreaming: Aboriginal Men’s Violence Against Women & Children (Melbourne: Pluto Press, 2007), 24.

[D18] Ibid., 16.

[D19] Windschuttle, The Fabrication of Aboriginal History, 443.

[D20] Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide, 104.

[D21] Colin Tatz, Obstacle Race: Aborigines in Sport (Sydney: UNSW Press, 1995), 8.

[D22] Douglas Booth, “Colin Tatz: ‘Compelled to Repair a Flawed World,’” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 14.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 109 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. ThereisaGod says: • Website

    Nathan Rothschild famously said in the early 1800′s that “Whoever controls the issuance of money controls the Empire and I control the issuance of money.”…. so, regarding the ‘crimes of Empire’ it is clear that Jews played a, perhaps the, leading role in those crimes.

    Thus, ‘Anti-Semitism’ is a natural and justified response to the Jewish ethnic aggression described in this excellent article.

    Perhaps we need gentile Professors here and there to start publishing books and teaching the world about THE GENOCIDE OF GENTILES in conflicts and Imperial adventures instigated by Jews; World Wars One and Two being obvious cases in point, given the overwhelming and oppressive influence of Jewish overlords on the “great” puppet political leaders (The Greys, the Wilsons, the Churchills) who sold this Jewish genocide to their (stupidly) trusting and uncomprehending peoples.

    These people will never stop until we stop them, one way or another.

    The best way would be to make the almost totally enslaved Spiritual donkey sactuary, that is “The Jewish People” aware of the crimes of their leaders and the Satanic nature of that leadership (as Christ, in His day, did) that the scales may fall from their eyes and the brainwashing that has been imposed on them undone. Well done The Unz Review for leading this (hopefully benign) process. Jewish enlightenment, rare though it appears to be, is a far preferable thing to gentile rage.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @JamesinNM
  2. Anonymous[342] • Disclaimer says:
    @ThereisaGod

    Jewsus was a Jew too. And Jewsus despised Gentiles (Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, Luke 22:25), just like any typical Jew. Why would you worship such an anti-White Rabbi?

    “Christianity, sprung from Jewish roots and comprehensible only as a growth on this soil, represents the counter-movement to any morality of breeding, of race, privilege: it is the anti-Aryan religion par excellence. Christianity—the revaluation of all Aryan values, the victory of chandala values, the gospel preached to the poor and base, the general revolt of all the downtrodden, the wretched, the failures, the less favored, against ‘race:’ the undying chandala hatred is disguised as a religion of love.”

    Friedrich Nietzsche
    Twilight of the Idols (Chap. 6)

    P.S. There is no obligation on the White man’s part to take sides in Jew-on-Jew violence. Who cares if the Jews didn’t like Jewsus and had him killed? The Communists assassinated Trotsky too, and we don’t think he’s great. The enemy of my enemy isn’t always my friend. Think about it.

  3. anon[146] • Disclaimer says:

    Jews (as a group) make trouble everywhere they go to other countries.

    • Replies: @Druid
  4. Anonymous[402] • Disclaimer says:

    Aborigenes have flags?

    Now that’s cultural appropriation.

    The Australian Aboriginal Flag was designed in 1971 by Aboriginal artist Harold Thomas, who is descended from the Luritja people of Central Australia and holds intellectual property rights to the flag’s design. The flag was originally designed for the land rights movement, and it became a symbol of the Aboriginal people of Australia.

    The sale of condoms in the colours of the Aboriginal flag won a public health award in 2005 for the initiative’s success in improving safe sex practices among young Indigenous people.

    The flag was to be part of the logo on Google Australia’s home page on Australia Day 2010, but the company was forced to modify the design due to Harold Thomas demanding payment if Google were to use it.

    The anti-Islamic group Reclaim Australia ["Reclaim Australia is a far-right Australian nationalist protest group which is associated with nationalist and neo-Nazi hate groups. Reclaim Australia primarily opposes Islam in Australia and is considered Islamophobic."] used the flag at their protests, which was openly condemned by the author Harold Thomas. He said of the use:

    They should get permission from Aboriginal communities in general. The flag is our identity and expression of who we are. It’s quite clear we use it freely and willingly and the government recognises the flag. It has its place.

    But to utilise it as a banner for anger or for another skewered reason is idiotic.

    • Replies: @Herald
  5. Anonymous[402] • Disclaimer says:

    Lemkin had defined “genocide” as involving “a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of the essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating groups themselves.”

    The obvious conclusion is that there is not a shadow of a doubt that Israel and its supporters in Western societies are engaged in a persistent, nasty and very well documented genocide in the Middle East that is ongoing and perhaps increasing in intensity even today.

    Where are the sanctions and condemnations and where are the “Responsibility to Protect” F-15s?

  6. No mention here of the ideologically difficult issue of Israeli support for Aparthied South Africa. Or Aussie/American neo-con support for anti-communist non-white immigration.

    Never let the complex and ironic truth get in the way of a simple story.

  7. There is little doubt that whites killed most of the Aboriginals
    Labumore: Elsie Roughsey, ‘An Aboriginal Mother Tells of the Old and the New´, Fitzroy, Victoria, 1984
    The last aboriginal Tasmanian died at the beginning of the 20th century.
    However, anyone who reads the old testament, the Torah, can see that it was little more than genocide and ethnic cleansing.
    The Roman empire defeated the jews, then jewry was further undermined by christianity.
    What jewry would have done if it had not been defeated, militarily and ideologically, anybody’s guess.
    If there had been a WWII without Bernard Baruch, 70 million or more deaths, also anybody’s guess.
    Had there been the Afghanistan and Iraq wars without AIPAC, I doubt it.

    • Replies: @Anon
  8. “Schuldfrage …”

    No, it is Schuldfreude, or joy in guilt, that all non-ethnic Western-persons are expected to embrace as they join the chorus calling for their own extirpation.

  9. Franz says:

    White folk have to stop thinking of “safe zones” for future habitation. At least without a serious spiritual readjustment.

    Nobody ever thought Australia would ever be anything but white as recently as the early post WWII era. Nobody thought Canada would ever be accused of “racism” since it was only the USA that had black slaves and Canada that was The Good Guy at the end of the Underground Railroad. Nobody thought Scandinavia would ever take immigrants in from anywhere, for any reason.

    All wrong. All under attack. Always the same attackers.

    Whites have a serious conceptual problem on that score. As long as they remain Christian, part of the enemy resides inside each white Christian’s head. Like the old Vedas reminded us all, if you worship your enemy’s god you will lose. But the white tribe will never give up Jesus.

    Or will it? The current year has seen a bestseller in the UK called The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical World by Catherine Nixey. There’s plenty more where that came from if one checks around a bit.

    I cannot imagine a non-Christian white society allowing Jewish academics and activists the “free pass” to attack their hosts in the way Christian societies let them. It’s at least a good reason to find out what Europe’s actual spiritual heritage really was, and what lured us into giving it up in the first place. Scholars, get to work!

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  10. DFH says:
    @Anonymous

    Who cares what a syphilitic failed philology professor rambled about?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  11. @Anonymous

    So The Man who gave us the parable of “The Good Samaratin” (telling the Judahites that gentiles were capable of being as close as or closer to God than Jews), who taught Jews to “Love your enemy” (i.e. go beyong the commands of the Pharissees that Jews must love other Jews but hate gentiles) … this man was not an avatar of The Divine, but a gentile-hater?

    Thanks, Rabbi.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  12. Funny how these academics seem to have missed what’s going on in Palestine.

    • Replies: @Grumbler
  13. Anonymous[935] • Disclaimer says:
    @ThereisaGod

    Hillarious! First, I’m not a Rabbi, so now we know what kind of Christian you are: a typical one. A damned liar.

    But even funnier!—you attempt to insult me by calling me what Jewsus was, a Rabbi. Jewsus is called a Rabbi, and acknowledges he was a Rabbi several times in the Jew Testament. And Jewsus was a very popular Rabbi among his fellow Kikes too.

    Luke 4:15 He taught in their synagogues and was glorified by everyone.

    Go on, ThereisaGod, try to insult me some more. I’m looking forward to smacking a cretin like you around some more with your own Jew Testament.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  14. Anonymous[718] • Disclaimer says:
    @Franz

    Indeed, it’s time to stop worshiping and pedestalizing the Jews as Christians do.

    • “We worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.” John 4:22
    • “The Jew first.” Romans 1:16

    And it’s time to stop feeding the Parasites as Christian Gentiles do.

    • “For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.” Romans 15:27

  15. DanFromCT says:

    Some years ago I caught an episode of Aussie TV’s Border Security show in which an Hasidic Jew coming from Israel was stopped at Sydney airport while attempting to smuggle several fairly large bags of rust-infected tree leaves. As I recall he claimed they were for cooking, but since no crop fungus, undetectable at departure, could fully engulf the leaves in so short a trip, and since no one would ever plan to cook with such tainted material, what could it have been but materiel for incubating an agricultural epidemic? This man, wearing Hasidic attire, tried to intimidate the customs inspector, at first by claiming to be a law professor in Israel, and when that didn’t work, by asserting he had acquired legal Aboriginal status. Australia has been and is being colonized by a lethal parasite of a more deadly sort it mistakes for the cure of its racial tensions.

  16. lavoisier says: • Website

    For Jews like Tatz, a “flawed world” is any world where Jewish interests are not forever prioritized.

    This is the take home message of this article.

    And it is a disturbing message for those of us who hope, however foolishly, that the Jewish question can somehow be resolved in a peaceful and reasonable manner for everyone.

    As it is now, far too many Jews have decided to declare a war on white people, whether explicit or not, and their actions are destroying western nations and their people.

    This has to stop.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Druid
  17. Anonymous[297] • Disclaimer says:
    @DFH

    DFH must state that he prefers insane Jew ramblings over White ramblings, because he’s a member of the genital mutilator Tribe.

    Philippians 3:3 For it is we [Christians] who are the Circumcision.

    And yeah, Jesus was insane. The Jew Testament says so.

    When his friends heard it, they went out to seize him: for they said, “He is insane.” Mark 3:21

    And the insanity became worse. What else would you call a crazy Jew who goes around cursing trees for not having fruit out of season?

    The next day as they were leaving Bethany, Jesus was hungry. Seeing in the distance a fig tree in leaf, he went to find out if it had any fruit. When he reached it, he found nothing but leaves, because it was not the season for figs. Then he said to the tree, “May no one ever eat fruit from you again”. And his disciples heard him say it. Mark 11:12–14, 20–25

    Puts new meaning to the word “ramblings,” does it not? LOL

  18. Anonymous[297] • Disclaimer says:
    @lavoisier

    If this has to stop, then what has to stop first is Christians poodles begging their Jewish Masters for crumbs.

    Matthew 15:27 “Yes, Lord, but even the White Poodles eat the crumbs which fall from their masters’ table.”

    Jewsus despised Gentiles, and stated it openly in Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, and Luke 22:25. Jewsus also demanded Whites “hate” their own blood (Luke 14:26) and “forsake” their own soil (Matthew 19:27-30).

    So hate the Magical Rabbi back. He has nothing to offer that can save White man anyway.

    • Replies: @Druid
  19. Miggle says:

    Great article Dr Sanderson, thanks!

    But it will take me a few days to digest it, so I won’t be making a detailed and suitably Judeophobic comment till then, if at all.

    But two points I can make, relating to the scarring of the women and the … disappearance … of the Tasmanians, which I think further document one of your and one of the Jews’ points.

    You write or quote:

    The high rate of injuries to female heads was very different from the results from studies of other peoples. His findings, according to anthropologist Peter Sutton, confirm that serious armed assaults were common in Australia over thousands of years prior to the arrival of Europeans.

    From British settlement in 1788, Europeans arriving in Australia were shocked at the extreme physical violence Aboriginal men inflicted on their women. Watkin Tench, a British marine officer who arrived on the First Fleet, noticed a young woman’s head “covered by contusions, and mangled by scars.” She had a spear wound above her left knee caused by a man who dragged her home to rape her. Tench wrote: “They are in all respects treated with savage barbarity; condemned not only to carry the children, but all other burthens. They meet in return for submission only with blows, kicks and every other mark of brutality.”[C15] Tench observed that when an Aboriginal man “is provoked by a woman, he either spears her, or knocks her down on the spot; on this occasion he always strikes on the head, using indiscriminately a hatchet, a club, or any other weapon, which may chance to be in his hand.” British soldier William Collins recounted how “We have seen some of these unfortunate beings with more scars upon their shorn heads, cut in every direction, than could be well distinguished or counted.”[C16]

    From James Bonwick, “The Lost Tasmanian Race” (1880 very approx.), the words of the French naturalist Péron, who landed on the island in 1802. First, about the women (p.15):

    Almost all were covered with scars, sad fruits of ill-treatment from
    their ferocious husbands.

    On that a point to be made is that they were all naked, so it was not possible to tell the women to cover their hair with some garment. Even today, Jewesses are being told to wear wigs, and Muslim women are being told to cover their hair. In the New Testament somewhere, Christian women are told to cover their hair.

    So, the need to make one’s wife look ugly to other men is universal. The naked Tasmanians were doing what civilized people all over them world throughout history were doing. They had no choice but to do it they way they did it.

    And at page 18, after describing the meeting of the Frenchmen with the native women, a cordial encounter in which they sang songs to each other and exchanged caresses, first a quote from Péron, and then Bonwick’s words:

    Thus ended our interview with the inhabitants of Diemen’s Land. All
    descriptions I have given are of the most rigorous exactitude, and without
    doubt it would have been difficult to deny oneself the sweet emotions
    which similar circumstances ought to inspire. …

    A lengthy, romantic paragraph by the Frenchman. Then the author:

    Such were the sentiments entertained of a people, almost universally
    regarded by English colonists, a few years later, as tigers and
    demons, whose destruction would be a deed of merit, as well as an act
    of necessity. Smile as we may at the simplicity of Péron, had our faith
    in the poor creatures been more like that of the kind-hearted Frenchmen,
    the reader might have been spared the story of the crimes and horrors
    attending the history of `The Lost Tasmanian Race.”

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  20. Michael7 says:

    The origins of the “genocide” charge embedded in these comments can be traced (inevitably) to a coterie of Jewish academics and intellectuals including, most prominently, Latrobe University historian Tony Barta and Sydney University genocide studies professor and “anti-racism” crusader Colin Tatz.

    It is disgusting how racism is openly practiced against whites while being presented as “anti-racism”.

    I can’t help but notice the lack of similar “anti-racism” overtures for the Palestinians and other oppressed people within Middle Eastern countries who have been kicked out of their homes, suffered in poverty, have been raped, killed, and forced to live in deplorable conditions. Conversely, the BDS movement, which seeks to protect real victims of oppression, has been viciously attacked by Jewish/Zionist groups. There’s a distinction to be made between ‘real victims’ and ‘fake victims’. The Israelis shoot and bomb Palestinians (a group of people with no standing army to protect themselves) and fire missiles into Syrian territory from the relative safety of Lebanese airspace, then they claim that they’re innocent victims acting in self-defense! Such behavior is an astonishing display of depravity and lack of empathy, one which every person who values human rights for all peoples should vehemently oppose and speak out against.

    One further point which is seldom mentioned: there are thousands of Christian Palestinians.

    • Agree: Miggle
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  21. Anonymous[312] • Disclaimer says:
    @Michael7

    There are millions of Christian Jews.

    Data from the Pew Research Center has it that, as of 2013, about 1.6 million adult American Jews identify themselves as Christians, most as Protestants.[52][53][54] According to the same data, most of the Jews who identify themselves as some sort of Christian (1.6 million) were raised as Jews or are Jews by ancestry.[53] According to a 2012 study, 17% of Jews in Russia identify themselves as Christians.[55][56]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Christian

    What exactly was your point?

    • Replies: @Michael7
    , @Miggle
    , @Miggle
  22. Anonymous[202] • Disclaimer says:

    Jews may be waging a war on Whites, but their war a minor sideshow. Whites are committing cultural suicide by accepting the universalist teachings of the International Jewsus.

    • John 3:16-17 For Jewgod so loved the universe [kosmos] … that the universe [kosmos] through him might be saved.
    • Go therefore and make disciples of all nations. Matthew 28:19
    • Proclaimed in his name to all nations. Luke 24:47

    And liberal secular humanists believe Jewsus the most, as John Gray points out:

    [T]he narrative of redemption that sustains secular humanists everywhere – is a hollowed-out version of a theistic myth.

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/what-scares-the-new-atheists

    Whites are committing suicide because they believe in the globalist vision of Jewsus that was shoved down their (or their parents’) throats in Sunday School, even if they don’t believe in the magical miracles anymore.

    Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in (((his))) sight.

  23. pyrrhus says:

    Skipping over the details, it’s just another example of the alien forces, mostly but not entirely jewish academics and journalists, that strive continually to destroy all white European countries, after thoroughly milking them…Either Australia wakes up, or it will be a 3d world hell hole with, at best, a minority white population.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  24. schrub says:

    I hope everyone realizes the gift that Ron Unz gives us by presenting information like this.

    I also want readers here to now pretend that they are trying to be like those sixth century AD Irish monks who worked so diligently to save so much of the literature from the ancient Greek and Roman worlds. Instead of books, however , you are now trying to save websites.

    How do you do this with Unz.com site and other non-PC sites?

    You do it by downloading entire websites like Unz.com to EXTERNAL hard drives to protect their contents for use in the future.

    WARNING: If you get lazy and leave this EXTERNAL hard drive permanently plugged into your computer once the website copying is completed, the information on it can be obliterated or altered by malicious online sources. If the hard drive is permanently attached, the information on it it can be found by any well-funded entity (especially state-funded ones) searching the web.

    If you don’t presently have an EXTERNAL hard drive, buy one, a big one. You want this new hard drive to be completely blank so do a full format on it before use to remove the junk and potential spyware software that hard drive manufacturers put on new drives.

    You can now get a four terabyte EXTERNAL hard drive for less than $100. At this point, using flash memory to do this quantity of preservation this is simply too expensive.

    Then encrypt this file once it is on this EXTERNAL drive.

    Then UNPLUG this drive and don’t use it for anything storing anything else, especially other things that you have downloaded from the web. (Take a tip from the Bitcoin crowd: nothing you store on a computer attached to the internet is actually yours)

    Read about the software that will allow you to do this here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTrack

    Download this software here:

    http://www.httrack.com/page/2/

    Learn about how it works here:

    http://www.httrack.com/html/shelldoc.html

    Read a Norton review as to its safety here:

    https://safeweb.norton.com/report/show?name=httrack.com

    Encryption: I use this source which is based in Sweden. You can do a little research to find another provider. Do yourself a favor and pay for the higher level of encryption. Free encryption software is worth exactly what you paid for it: i.e. almost nothing.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AxCrypt

  25. Anonymous[189] • Disclaimer says:
    @pyrrhus

    Do we consider Christians, who are loyal to a “King of Israel” (John 1:49) and consider themselves “citizens” (Philippians 3:20, Ephesians 2:19) of the foreign capital city Jerusalem (Revelation 21:2) as alien forces?

    Would Australians behave differently if they considered their own people as chosen and their own land as holy and, for those needing an afterlife narrative to ameliorate their mortality salience, looked forward to an immortal eternity of shrimp on the barbie on a Pacific beach in the outback?

  26. Between 1500 and 1900, an ever-increasing flood of culturally confident, technologically supreme, and numerous white people joyously washed over the earth, taking just about everything they wished to.

    The responses of the various indigenous peoples varied, from the Japanese realizing ‘we’d better catch up about now‘ to various American Indian tribes deciding to roll over and die — literally.

    Generally, the response seems to have varied according to the sophistication of the people invaded. The Indians of the sub-continent, for example, are obviously still digesting the experience, but seem to have gotten the idea, at least in theory. American Indian farming tribes such as the Cherokee and Pueblo are still around and functioning, if not necessarily paragons of social success. Advanced paleolithic hunters like the Sioux, on the other hand, have massive and very visible problems. The more primitive hunter-gatherers, on the other hand like those Indians who originally inhabited the San Francisco Bay Area promptly died — so fast that we barely know anything about them.

    So looked at in that way, it was pretty inevitable that Australian aborigines would do badly — and they have. Spectacularly so. It’s really no more the fault of the white people than it’s the fault of the wolf that sheep aren’t very good at self-defense. Of course we were going to take and repopulate Australia. There was literally nothing to stop us.

    • Replies: @Hu Mi Yu
    , @Kratoklastes
  27. Herald says:
    @Anonymous

    Nobody could accuse you of dwelling on trivia.

  28. Respect says:
    @Anonymous

    Nietzsche was a humped siphilitic prussian .

    The good jews followed Christ and became Christians .

    The bad jews , the farisees and alike rejected and killed Christ and remained servants of dark Baal .

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  29. ‘…Aboriginal activist Tarneen Onus-Williams…’

    She’s certainly hideous enough, but judging by her complexion, Ms. Onus-Williams must be part white.

    Anyway, since she rejects white Australia and all its works, why not dump her in a remote part of the Outback and see how her aboriginal survival skills are? Remember to take pictures…

    • Replies: @Grumbler
  30. @Miggle

    Well, I suppose the British needed an excuse for the genocide of the Tasmanians.
    Just after 1900 the last one died.
    How the British behaved there
    Marcus Clarke, ‘For the Term of his Natural Life’, 1874, 1970, London
    it is a novel, but with a historical basis.

  31. Another note on the ‘genocide’ charge.

    Britain’s complicity in any such programme is, to say the least, doubtful. As I recall, as early as the 1830′s the colonial government moved decisively against violence aimed at Aborigines, trying and hanging several whites who had killed some Aborigines.

    Compare and contrast, incidentally, with Israel’s treatment of Jews who murder Palestinians.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  32. Ram says:

    Sometime ago I happened to read that when Captain Cook (or the Portugese who allegedly arrived before him at the North Coast) there were some 3.000,000 natives on the land but today there are but 300,000.

    We know that Holocaust memorials and museums have been built all over the Western World, Is there any such for the natives of Australia. ?

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Wally
  33. Anonymous[415] • Disclaimer says:
    @Respect

    You said “The good jews.” And that’s the problem with Christianity. It’s based on worship of those allegedly “good Jews.”

    But they weren’t so good after all, being proto-Bolshevists, as economist Ludwig von Mises noted when he wrote that “primitive Christianity is Bolshevism.” (Socialism, p. 413)

    “Not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them…and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.” Acts 4:32-35

    Of course, you might be the type who thinks Bolshevism is good. After all, you do worship a Jew.

    • Replies: @Respect
  34. Mace says:

    I read this over at TOO last week. Talk about a triggering article. What’s really fascinating is how these academic jews cherrypick history and then just blatantly lie about what happened, and then it just becomes common knowledge, and a source of vast shame. I’d already known the “stolen generations” thing was mostly BS, but I wasn’t aware of the extent of it.

    Truth serves virtually no role in our modern discourse. Everything is twisted to conform to the overriding narrative: whites are evil.

  35. The Aboriginals complain that everything was better before white man arrived in Australia. But they have a choice. They can drop their pants, throw away the keys to the Toyota, forsake the McDonalds drive-thru, sharpen themselves a stick and wander into the scrub to live the lives of their ancestors. I’ve yet to hear of one of them taking up the opportunity

    • Replies: @Liza
  36. How are Jewish folks who emigrated to Australia then not equally oppressors, just for their very presence on the land like everyone else? Most Jewish people are a subset of “white,” after all.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @OilcanFloyd
  37. Anonymous[316] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright

    Genocide, murder, whatever you want to call it, is the only way civilization gets done.

    “A Civilization is a dominant community that imposes its beliefs upon all other communities by violence, which must involve the use of genocide; so any community that recoils from inflicting genocide will suffer genocide.”

    Philip Atkinson
    http://www.ourcivilisation.com

    If you’re not doing it, you’re getting it done to you. One way or the other, you’re going to be involved in genocide.

    “Genocide is as human as art or prayer.”

    John Gray
    Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals

    Accept your nature.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Grumbler
  38. Emigrate.
    Ruthlessly criticize, exaggerate, denigrate…subvert, lie, cheat, steal.
    Welcome to the ‘Jew Game’(rigged).
    Attack, attack, attack.
    Revel and gloat about the power you have bought (media).
    Scream anti-semite, Holocaust,Self-hating jew if anyone complains.
    Rinse, repeat.
    Successful formula?

    What happens when no one believes it anymore but kooky old blue-haired dykes?

    It’s okay Jews. Your elites have thought ahead, hint: learn ukrainian.

  39. Respect says:

    https://www.rt.com/news/438638-swedish-professor-biologically-different/

    Are the swedes , archetypes of the blond arian whites , one of the most stupid and fanatic people on earth ? or do we blame the jews for Sweden`s idiocy ?

    No matter how much scientific progress the west has made ,and how rich it is , increasing numbers of non whites , and even of whites , are feeling a tremendous anger , rejection and aggression towards the prevalent western paradigm which they perceive as pervert , fanatical , tyrannical and void of common sense .

    • Replies: @Wally
  40. Respect says:
    @Anonymous

    Christians saved Greco-Roman civilization for more than a millenium , I don`t think you can say they were were proto-bolsheviks .

    Ludwig von Misses ( is he a prophet ? ) , and Donald Duck can kiss banker’s ass , Economics is a false science .

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  41. Wally says:
    @Ram

    said:
    “We know that Holocaust memorials and museums have been built all over the Western World, Is there any such for the natives of Australia. ?”

    As for just one such fake “museum” for a fake story:

    Tax exempt cash taken in by USHMM (US Holocau$t Memorial Museum), aka: ‘Holocau$t’ Theme Park, for fiscal year 2016 which supports huge salaries for Jews only, which most of the remaining money goes to Jews & Zionist organizations:
    $151,826,695.00 : https://www.ushmm.org/m/pdfs/042717-IRS-Form-990-FY16.pdf
    US taxpayers money to the USHMM in the 2017 budget:
    56,999,500.00 : https://www.ushmm.org/m/pdfs/20160209-fy17-pres-budget-request.pdf
    There are over 100 ‘holocaust’ oriented ‘museums’ / indoctrination centers throughout the US alone, they all receive US taxpayer funding.

    http://www.vho.org/GB/c/DT/gcturen.html

    U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum displays standard German air-raid shelter door, describing it as the door to a gas chamber at Majdanek
    see text via linkhttp://www.vho.org/GB/c/DT/gcturen_files/doorcasting.jpg
    Gas Van Film and Photo Fraud / German News Magazine and Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Museum Caught Faking Photo and Film Captions: http://codoh.com/library/document/3276

    http://www.codoh.com

  42. Wally says:
    @Ram

    And who counted these “3,000,000 natives”?

    Or did that fat woman shown in the article just make it up?

  43. Wally says:
    @Fran Macadam

    Ah.
    That’s a big reason why they invented the fake ‘holocaust’. A weapon and a shield.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

  44. @Anonymous

    ‘Genocide, murder, whatever you want to call it, is the only way civilization gets done.’

    This actually isn’t true. It has happened, but more generally, conquest and the spreading of civilization is a process of assimilation and synthesis. Most of Latin America is a lot more like Spain than it is like the various pre-Columbian Indian cultures — but genetically, the various peoples tend to be more Indian than Caucasian. I suspect most Eastern ‘Germans’ are at least partly Slav. Spaniards in at least Southern Spain very visibly share some genetic material with Morocco. ‘Turks’ can be indistinguishable from Greeks. And so on.

  45. Wally says:
    @Respect

    said:
    “No matter how much scientific progress the west has made ,and how rich it is , increasing numbers of non whites , and even of whites , are feeling a tremendous anger , rejection and aggression towards the prevalent western paradigm which they perceive as pervert , fanatical , tyrannical and void of common sense .”

    Hellooo, I wonder what conditioned them to feel & think that.

    Indeed, one of prime purposes of the fake ‘holocaust’ was to get such results.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

  46. Anonymous[229] • Disclaimer says:
    @Respect

    Oh sure, Jew-worshiper, put the spin on those Dark Ages.

    27 February AD 380: Christianity becomes the state religion of the Roman Empire.
    Between AD 400 and 800: Various famines in Western Europe…population of the city of Rome fell by over 90%, mainly because of famine and plague.

    • Replies: @Michael7
    , @Colin Wright
  47. Last week Germany television showed a reportage about antisemitism in Germany (I believe about 45 minutes long, actually in the last times they seem to talk about this every day). It was done for German television by an Australian Jew who speaks German with a heavy accent and makes mistakes. He discovered that there is antisemitism when he saw someone criticising Israel.

    And there was on the same day an interview in Spiegel online with an unknown Jewish author, Max Czollek, talking about his first book (I believe), a book about Germany. I couldn’t read the interview as it was behind a pay wall. I tried to get some information about the book and read some pages which are available. The title of the book is “Desintegriert euch!”. As far as I understood, what he means is very simple. Germany should desintegrate in order that he feels better in Germany as a Jew. He seems also to say more or less that the matter of the Holocaust isn’t finished yet and that the whole thing hasn’t been forgotten. In short, Germany has to desintegrate in order that he feels better in Germany.

  48. Michael7 says:
    @Anonymous

    @Anonymous[312]

    There are millions of Christian Jews.

    What exactly was your point?

    The point was that the mainstream media typically conceals the fact (that there are thousands of Christian Palestinians) from the Western public so as not to arouse ire from Christians whenever the IDF launches an attack. The narrative is carefully constructed.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  49. Michael7 says:
    @Anonymous

    @Anonymouse[229]

    Correlation does not equal causation. Am I to understand it that you’re trying to blame Christianity for the spread of famine and plague? Really?

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Anonymous
  50. @Anonymous

    That’s the most ridiculous and ignorant ‘graph’ I’ve ever seen.

    Oh sure: put your assumptions into a graph, and it becomes fact.

    Too bad your assumptions are garbage. I won’t even bother with refuting them.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  51. JamesinNM says:

    Destroy every living thing, below, on, and above Australia and make Australia uninhabitable for eternity. Give her her wish and make her the last one to die so she can realize her wish

  52. @Michael7

    ‘Correlation does not equal causation. Am I to understand it that you’re trying to blame Christianity for the spread of famine and plague? Really?’

    Indeed. This is something anti-religionists do a lot. A given group of people adopt a faith — and then all of a sudden, every single failure and moral shortcoming becomes the fault of that faith.

    Various less spectacular illustrations exist, but we inadvertently conducted an experiment in the last century. What happens if we strip a people of their religion? Does their behavior improve? See Communist Russia and Nazi Germany; not exactly.

    Wilhelmine Germany was capable of the brutal suppression of the Hereros; Nazi Germany committed the Holocaust. The Tsar’s Holy Armament had never exactly been renowned for good behavior — but it was nothing compared to the Red Army when it entered Germany.

    Christianity (and Islam, and I would assume Buddhism) don’t magically make people into saints. However, they do discernably improve their behavior, overall.

  53. JamesinNM says:
    @ThereisaGod

    Read Michael Hoffman’s books on Judaism.

    • Replies: @ThereisaGod
  54. Liza says:
    @Voltara Smith

    Don’t they do this once in a lifetime or something, even today? I think it’s called the walkabout in search of the dreamtime or some such words where, without any accoutrements, they go into the outback like they did a long time ago before evil Whitey came along. I guess after a few months of that, McDonalds looks good! After living on ants, grubs and dew for water.

    Couldn’t be bothered looking it up; maybe someone here knows more about this practice.

  55. JamesinNM says:

    False Jews. Revelation 2:9 and 3:9.

  56. Anonymous[202] • Disclaimer says:
    @Michael7

    Michael7: Correlation does not equal causation.

    False. Parroting half-truth bromides just makes you look stupid. Correlation is the only way we can determine causation. So here’s a lesson for you:

    The shortest true statement that can be made about causality and correlation is one of the following: (a) “Empirically observed covariation is a necessary but not sufficient condition for causality.” (b) “Correlation is not causation but it sure is a hint.” wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation

    You’ve been schooled. Don’t pull that crap again, Jew-worshiper.

    Consider the ravens: They do not sow or reap, they have no storeroom or barn; yet God feeds them. And how much more valuable you are than birds! Luke 12:24

    Then the bird-brains starved, because they were told the cares of this world were a sin. Such are the consequences of Jew-worship.

  57. Miggle says:
    @Anonymous

    Dear Anonymous[935],

    They say that Ashkenazi Jews are of higher intelligence than the rest of us. Do you think that applies to yourself? You are making highly intelligent comments?

    Another question: Did the word “rabbi” ante-date Rabbinical Judaism? (To explain to others, I mean was it in use before Rabbinical Judaism existed?) If so, what did usage of the word signify way back then? If not, when and by whom was it legally defined with its present meaning?

    Please bring your intelligence to bear on my questions.

    Regards,
    Miggle

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  58. Anonymous[144] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright

    Insults followed by apoplexy. Much resist. Very progress. Are you a Hillary voter too?

    Successful Farmer: “I will store my surplus grain.”

    Jewsus: “You fool!”

    Luke 12:13-21 – The Parable of the Rich Fool

    There are consequences for a society that believes a Jewish fairytale that grain storage leads to being roasted alive by a petulant Jewgod.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  59. Anonymous[259] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright

    Being anti-Jew makes one into an “anti-religionist?” Wow, you’re fully kiked now, if you imagine there are no other religions other than Jewdeo-originated.

    Worshiping a Jew will discernably improve their behavior? LOLOL You’re dumber than I thought. Believing in the Magical Jew is as stupid as believing in Magical Soil.

    79 percent of African-Americans say religion is very important in their lives while 56 percent of all U.S. adults said the same

    African-Americans Most Religiously Devout Group

    https://www.christianpost.com/news/african-americans-most-religiously-devout-group-36736/

    Dey gots Jayzuz! There’s power in the Jew, power in the Jew!

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  60. Anonymous[311] • Disclaimer says:
    @Michael7

    Ah, just like Christians typically conceal the fact from debate that Jesus was a Rabbi who despised Gentiles and was popular among the Jews in the Synagogues. Usually these deceitful Christians use the Greek term for good, Christ, rather than Jewish name Jesus. The narrative is carefully constructed.

    So anyway, why would Whites in North America or Europe be upset their so-called “brothers” in Middle-eastern Asia, if they aren’t as universalist/globalists as George Soros himself?

  61. @Anonymous

    ‘…Being anti-Jew makes one into an “anti-religionist?” Wow, you’re fully kiked now, if you imagine there are no other religions other than Jewdeo-originated…’

    I have to admit that inasmuch as it was previously decided I was a Jew in disguise, it would make sense that I’m ‘fully kiked’ as well.

    Oh, whatever to do…

  62. @Anonymous

    ‘Insults followed by apoplexy. Much resist. Very progress. Are you a Hillary voter too?’

    No, I’m not a Hillary voter. I didn’t even become apoplectic.

    …but your graph really is stupid. Trust me.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  63. @Fran Macadam

    How many Jews moved to America to live in wigwams and teepees, and experience a stone-age and nomadic existence? Exactly none. By Jewish logic, the tribe is attempting to receive stolen property. What they are really attempting to do is conquer the West and repopulate it with people that they believe they can dominate or work with and still remain privileged.

  64. Anonymous[311] • Disclaimer says:
    @Miggle

    The Jew Paul writes in the Jew Testament that Christians are of lower intelligence and ignoble to boot.

    One Corinthians 1:18-26 “For the message about the cross is nonsense…the nonsense of our preaching…Not many of you were wise by human standards…not many were noble…”

    Do you think that applies to yourself? You are making low intelligent comments? Or is the Jew Paul wrong? Please bring your inept fanaticism to bear on my questions.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  65. Druid says:
    @anon

    The first step in the destruction of a country is Jewish immigration

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  66. Druid says:
    @lavoisier

    I’ve been wondering for 30 years when people will wake up to this tribal disease that is talmudism

  67. Druid says:
    @Anonymous

    Zio troll! I am no Christian but Jesus was far superior to your talmudist shite rabbis and you

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @anomalous
  68. Anonymous[889] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright

    Ah, you can’t explain anything rationally like a White man, you just say “trust me.” Just like the Hebes.

    Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is confidence.

    The Hebrew tribe of confidence men is definitely your kin. You’re playing a confidence game just like Bernie “Trust Me” Madoff.

  69. Anonymous[889] • Disclaimer says:
    @Druid

    Moi? Not a zionist, not a jew. Never read the talmud. Never met a rabbi. So that makes you a liar.

    But Jesus was a Zionist. Jesus was a Jew. Jesus was a Rabbi.

    So how is a Zionist Jewish Rabbi “far superior” to Zionist Jewish Rabbis, hmm?

    Luke 4:15 He [Jewsus] taught in their synagogues and was glorified by everyone.

    • Troll: renfro
  70. Miggle says:
    @Anonymous

    There are millions of Christian Jews.

    Data from the Pew Research Center has it that, as of 2013, about 1.6 million adult American Jews identify themselves as Christians, most as Protestants.[52][53][54] According to the same data, most of the Jews who identify themselves as some sort of Christian (1.6 million) were raised as Jews or are Jews by ancestry.[53] According to a 2012 study, 17% of Jews in Russia identify themselves as Christians.[55][56]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Christian

    What exactly was your point?

    That is deceptive nonsense. If modern Jews convert to Christianity they cease to be Jews. You are implying that they become Christians but remain of the “Jewish race”. There is no such thing, with the single exception of the Palestinians, who are Muslims and Christians of the ancient Jewish race. Your Wikipedia reference explains that with its opening words, that Jewish Christians were Bible-era geographical Judeans. If there’s something devious further into that Wikipedia article I didn’t come to it.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  71. Anonymous[889] • Disclaimer says:
    @Druid

    Jewish immigration, like this?

    And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world.

    Jesus, AD 33
    Jerusalem, Israel
    (((Mark 16:15)))

    You are right about the destruction.

    For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (((Matthew 10:35)))

  72. Hu Mi Yu says:
    @Colin Wright

    The more primitive hunter-gatherers, on the other hand like those Indians who originally inhabited the San Francisco Bay Area promptly died — so fast that we barely know anything about them.

    No, they are still around. Digger Indians were prominent in San Francisco hippydom. Indians harvest acorns from the public spaces as allowed by treaty. If you go at the right time, you can watch them from the Mountain View public library.

    They caught on quickly. You can’t tell from the census data. By a quirk of California law they were counted as white as soon as they could speak Spanish or English. Just over the hills near Los Baños there are Indians who still speak their native language.

  73. Miggle says:
    @Anonymous

    There are millions of Christian Jews.

    Data from the Pew Research Center has it that, as of 2013, about 1.6 million adult American Jews identify themselves as Christians, most as Protestants.[52][53][54] According to the same data, most of the Jews who identify themselves as some sort of Christian (1.6 million) were raised as Jews or are Jews by ancestry.[53] According to a 2012 study, 17% of Jews in Russia identify themselves as Christians.[55][56]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Christian

    What exactly was your point?

    That is deceptive nonsense. If modern Jews convert to Christianity they cease to be Jews. You are implying that they become Christians but remain of the “Jewish race”. There is no such thing, with the single exception of the Palestinians, who are Muslims and Christians of the ancient Jewish race. Your Wikipedia reference explains that with its opening words, that Jewish Christians were Bible-era geographical Judeans. If there’s something devious further into that Wikipedia article I didn’t come to it.

    In other words there are ZERO Christian Jews today.

  74. Anonymous[889] • Disclaimer says:
    @Miggle

    If modern Jews convert to Christianity they cease to be Jews.

    Tada!

    Talk about deceptive nonsense; that’s the Magic Soil narrative, on steroids. Read some European history, they already tried out your silly story.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  75. @Colin Wright

    Between 1500 and 1900, an ever-increasing flood of culturally confident, technologically supreme, and numerous white people joyously washed over the earth, taking just about everything they wished to.

    True as far as it goes, but for a goodly chunk of that space (from the miod-1700s onwards) the Eurotrash were putatively – according to their own law – operating under a system whereby if the indigenes had a recognisable set of rules that governed property, they had to be invaded “properly” (i.e., with a declaration of war) or they had to be negotiated with. If they didn’t have that sort of institutional infrastructure, then the land was declared terra nullius (which absolutely does not mean “uninhabited” – it just means “There’s nobody here we can meaningfully talk to“.

    In places where they did not apply the doctrine of terra nullius, the Poms were particularly bad at working out which of “invade/negotiate’ they claimed to be doing – and often, it was clear that they were deliberately keeping things opaque.

    Furthermore, their ‘negotiations’ were often underhand and in obvious bad faith, as is has been made abundantly clear by the ‘diff’ between the Maori and Pakeha versions of Te Tiriti o Waitangi; in the Maori (which is what the Maori signatories understood), the rangatira (chiefs) invited the British to set up a system of governance (kawanatanga) over the growing (white) immigrant population… but they specifically did not cede sovereignty (rangatiratanga) .

    The English version… not so much. The British claimed sovereignty, and also asserted that the Crown was the only valid purchaser of land.

    Nek minnit, Poms were turning up with what they claimed were titles to land (as it happens, land near Waitara, which belongs to my tribe); deeds of sale signed by people who did not have the right to sell so much as a square inch of soil. (In fact under Maori law, nobody has the right to dispose of land; it belongs to the iwi and can change hands only by conquest)

    That has been the cause of 4 wars, and litigation ever since… and now the NZ government is about to sign a $300 million settlement with Ngapuhi (the tribe next door to mine) for the punitive seizure of land after an insurrection in protest at Treaty violations by the Crown.

    Let me be clear where I stand though: I have some sympathy for the Aborigines. They weren’t ‘invaded’, in any formal sense, so the land was not acquired by the Crown by dint of conquest, which would have made the acquisition valid; there were also no negotiations worth talking about, and the Aboringinal societies certainly had a system that qualifies as ‘property law’ (they excluded; they inherited; they asserted sole right to occupy).

    They got dudded, big time – but unlike the Maori they did not fight back with enough alacrity to get the Poms to notice. This is a big ask for the Aborigines because of the huge distances involved in Australia, but bear in mind there were more Aborigines living within 500 miles of Botany Bay, than there were Maori in the whole of New Zealand… and yet the Kiwi chocolates were able to fight England to a draw (which, against a superpower, counts as a win), whereas the Aussie chocolates got thumped.

    Kinda like modern rugby.

    Oh… and one final thing (about flags): the Aboriginal flag is a fiction invented well after Australia was colonised.

    By stark contrast, the flag of the United Tribes of New Zealand dates from 1830 and along with the Declaration of the Independence of New Zealand (He Wakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni) served as the assertion of sovereignty prior to negotiations with the Crown (which in turn pre-dated British attempts at colonising NZ after 1840).

    That Declaration of Independence was the primary piece of evidence that the rangatira did not ever intend to cede sovereignty to England, and so the English version of the Treaty is invalid in the law as it stood at the time (and subsequently).

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @anon
  76. sb says:

    I don’t know how many times this has to be said.
    Here we go again.

    There are plenty of people alive today who consider themselves to be Tasmanian Aborigines and are accepted as such
    Just as there are plenty of people in North America who claim to be of a specific indigenous American tribe and are accepted as such even though they are of mixed heritage
    There is a large community in New Zealand who call themselves Maori and yet it is doubtful if any of them have 100% Maori ancestry

    Tasmanian aborigines were always few in number – a couple of thousand at best -and their numbers were decreasing before whites entered the picture.
    Just another guns germs and steel episode of many

  77. Given that you’re such a stickler about the word genocide being used correctly, you should agree with me that all the white nationalists and alt-righters making a fuss about “white genocide” are a bunch of nutcases.

  78. The Jewish population of Australia is only about half of one per cent and Aborigines, even including those just cashing in on having some Aboriginal ancestry are only about 2.5 per cent so bizarre characters like Katz are not likely to be remembered in 20 years time. The selective immigration by ethnic Chinese and Indians (already much larger than the Aboriginal and Jewish populations combined) will also probably fortify Australia’s resistance to the American and British PC diseases.

    One correction. I once had some correspondence with Dirk Moses – also a purveyor of bizarre views – and, in the course of it he said he was not Jewish.

  79. @Kratoklastes

    If you were an Israeli lawyer advising the New Zealand government do you think you could assure them that the settled disposition of sovereignty and possession of property as at 1948 should be an adequate test of validity?

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
  80. Anon[160] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    “Whites killed most of the Aboriginals”. Absolute BS. They killed some, and there were some mass murders as at Myall Creek for which white men were hanged. But most deaths were from Eurasian diseases Aborigines had no.immunity to.

  81. @JamesinNM

    I have ‘Judaism’s Strange Gods’ and ‘ and ‘Judaism Discovered’ on a shelf beside me. What point are you making?

  82. anomalous says:
    @Druid

    Ron, Ron, Ron!

    Deep flaw in your software. The numbered Anonymous. So many! Can’t you give us the option of switching of comments from and replies to them all, so that those mainly nonsensical posts are not even seen?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  83. Miggle says:
    @Anonymous

    “If modern Jews convert to Christianity they cease to be Jews.”

    Tada!

    Talk about deceptive nonsense; that’s the Magic Soil narrative, on steroids. Read some European history, they already tried out your silly story.

    Simple denial gets you nowhere, with or without the tone of mockery. Why no quotations and cited sources? In any case it’s not a matter of opinion, it’s a formal change of religion.

    That your dear late friend Adolf was in full agreement with you, insisting for pragmatic reasons that modern Jews are a race, brushing aside post-Biblical history, does not advance your credibility one little bit.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  84. From one of Australia’s greatest success stories with a 9/11 connection:

    Australia ‘moving in the wrong direction ‘says Frank Lowy

    Lots of Shoah grist for the mill in this one yet still it’s never enough for Australia to have welcomed him we must discriminate against our own children in favour of his.

    ““There is a rising crescendo of opinion from columnists and politicians saying we should reduce our immigration intake.”

    “And in the past year our immigration intake has declined. We have gone from migration targets to migration caps. I think we are moving in the wrong direction.”

    I don;t blame “Sir” Frank for being pro his people but ffs fuck off to Israel if you’re so concerned about our immigration policy, and take your bleeding heart pom Churchillian contingent with you as you go.

    We owe you nothing, Frank. You owe us everything.

    There is only ONE Australia:

    It is White.

    It is Celt-Anglo at base.

    It is completely at ease with itself:

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  85. Michael7 says:
    @Colin Wright

    Indeed. This is something anti-religionists do a lot. A given group of people adopt a faith — and then all of a sudden, every single failure and moral shortcoming becomes the fault of that faith.

    Yes, those with an axe to grind against religion always find a hundred different ways to attack it, perhaps to counteract a guilty conscious, i.e. justify sin. Or, because they hate a particular group and want to justify harming them. It’s ironic how so many of the pro-Hitler supporters fail to discern how evil national socialist Germany was under his reign. Just for the record, opposing Hitler doesn’t automatically mean favoring the Weimar Republic or the Bolshevik communists, as I’m opposed to all.

    @Miggle

    They say that Ashkenazi Jews are of higher intelligence than the rest of us.

    This isn’t true at all.

    As you can see, Israel ranks around 40 overall in math, science and reading. If what you said were true then this would be reflected in the overall scores.

    • Replies: @Anon
  86. Anonymous[364] • Disclaimer says:
    @Miggle

    Calling people Nazis? Do you dye your hair purple too?

  87. @Pat Hannagan

    Isn’t there a simpler explanation for Frank Lowy’s pro immigration views? It’s good for the bottom line if you are in his business. A test would be to see if he agrees with Australia’s current immigration criteria which does not favour cheap labour or adding to the Labor Party’s ethnic supporters (much). It would be very suspicious if he supported open borders.

  88. Anon[353] • Disclaimer says:
    @Michael7

    Duh! What proportion of Israelis, even just Israeli Jews, do you think are Ashkenazim?

  89. Anonymous[224] • Disclaimer says:
    @anomalous

    That option is already implemented. Just press alt+F4.

  90. Grumbler says:
    @JoaoAlfaiate

    Always remember, it is not wrong if Jews do it. Because y’know six million or something…

  91. Grumbler says:
    @Colin Wright

    Love the irony of the aboriginal activist demanding all of Whiteness be removed while she is speaking with a microphone and a cell phone in her hand. Will this lovely POC refuse to have any of the things like electricity and cell phones that evil White people created and shared with POC? POC hate Whitey but man they sure love the White man’s inventions that have made their lives one million times better.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  92. Grumbler says:
    @Anonymous

    The history of almost all of humanity- not just White history – has been one of fighting for resources and conquering others. That Whites have emerged (currently) as the victors in this eternal struggle does not make Whites “more guilty” than POC of universal human behavior.

    The openly stated purpose of forced immigration of POC into White Western Civ is to destroy what Whites have built by bringing about “diversity” which is just code for White Genocide.

  93. Anonymous[224] • Disclaimer says:

    You’re not alone:

  94. @Grumbler

    ‘Love the irony of the aboriginal activist demanding all of Whiteness be removed while she is speaking with a microphone and a cell phone in her hand. Will this lovely POC refuse to have any of the things like electricity and cell phones that evil White people created and shared with POC?’

    For a real hoot, imagine Ms Overfed Mulatto trying to live with bunch of actual Australian Aborigines living the actual Aborigine lifestyle in the actual Outback.

    She’s a parasite in the worst way possible. Not only is she utterly dependent on her host, she sees it as her duty to abuse him as much as possible. At least your basic tapeworm tries to keep quiet about it.

  95. @Colin Wright

    Enough with the holohoax. We’re all tired of the lie. Go sell it somewhere else judeo-supremacisf.

  96. Miggle says:
    @Anonymous

    The Jew Paul writes in the Jew Testament that Christians are of lower intelligence and ignoble to boot.

    One Corinthians 1:18-26 “For the message about the cross is nonsense…the nonsense of our preaching…Not many of you were wise by human standards…not many were noble…”

    Do you think that applies to yourself? You are making low intelligent comments? Or is the Jew Paul wrong? Please bring your inept fanaticism to bear on my questions.

    The subject of the article is “Jewish War on White Australia”. How do your hate-filled words and deceptive Bible quotations fit into that?

    Are you a Jew expressing your hatred of Australia, or of Christians?

    Or are you a nothing, trying to stir up Christian hatred of Jews? If so, why?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  97. Anonymous[202] • Disclaimer says:
    @Miggle

    Hate-filled words, say you?

    Luke 14:26 “If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters–yes, even their own life–such a person cannot be my disciple.

    Try harder next time, ok? Morons like you don’t even know what the hateful Jewsus character said. You’ve been schooled.

    • Troll: Giuseppe
  98. @Wizard of Oz

    That’s an easy one – almost a Dorothy Dixer.

    It all comes down to Yahweh the Foreskin-Obsessed Sky Maniac.

    When he was considering conferring Master-Race-ness over part of his earthly bits of creation, Yahweh plumped for an incestuous couple of Mesopotamian[0] goatherds (Avram and Sarai were half-siblings: same father).

    Yadda yadda
    , Moses, 2 million people taking 40 years to travel 150 miles but leaving no archeological trace (Exodus), yadda yadda Assyrian/Phoenecian/Roman conquest yadda yadda Diaspora…

    So the jurisprudence is absolutely clear: if I’m a Zionist lawyer, and you disagree with my analysis, you’re a despicable anti-Semite and basically exactly the same as that shouty-gesticulatey Austrian dude from 80 years ago with a red armband and a weird moustache.

    Sounds fucking stupid, right?

    But that’s basically the story: some Litvaks and other Eurotrash conduct a campaign of ethnic cleansing in 1948, legitimised because a provably-ahistorical fiction says that Yahweh promised the land to the descendants of some incestuous Mesopotamian nomads. (Otherwise the Hill of Foreskins[1] is for naught).

    Compare that to: the Poms craft a dodgy treaty in 2 language versions with different meanings, and now the NZ government relies on the English version to buttress its claim to rightful sovereignty over Maori land (sovereignty that the current government inherited from the “Magic Genitals” system in the UK).

    The second example, while stupendously risible, is more plausible. It will not survive judicial review; in another half-century Crown land in NZ will be owned by Maori, and all major cities that are on illegitimately-acquired[2] Maori land will pay reparational taxes – that is the plan, and there’s no stopping it now.

    [0] “Ur of the Chaldees” might also be in modern-day Turkey; depends who you ask. In reality, Avram was a fictional character anyhow, so it’s like trying to work out the lat/lon of Smallville, Kansas. (At least we know Spider-Man is real, because Peter Parker was born in New York)

    [1] the Hill of Foreskins is a thing. It’s 100000% retarded, but it’s a thing.

    [2] Some cities in NZ are located on land that was legitimately acquired. Not many in the North Island, but most of the South Island is fine. That’s why American billionaires are buying land down there.

  99. anon[146] • Disclaimer says:
    @Kratoklastes

    Your revisionism is amazing.

  100. Miggle says:

    We need some blackfellas to comment here. Come on, you blokes and sheilas! You abos! Agree with Onus-Williams? With Tatzarlatan? What’s the best way forward? The best future scenario?

    • Replies: @Miggle
    , @peterAUS
  101. Miggle says:
    @Miggle

    Oops! No need! Jacinta Price has said it all!

    • Replies: @Miggle
  102. peterAUS says:
    @Miggle

    We need some blackfellas to comment here.

    Not really.

    What’s the best way forward?
    The best future scenario?

    You mean for them? I’ll tell you:look at South Africa.
    True, numbers aren’t good for them in Australia; a lot better in NZ though.

    So….take South Africa as a model/foundation and customize it for Kiwis/Aussies, in that order.

    Having said that, that’s what “blackfellas” elites want. Simply to rule, be on the top.
    Will it happen, who knows?
    The “problem” in that desire/vision are Chinese and Indians. Something like in Fiji, for example. We know how local “blackfellas” elites fixed that issue.

    Time and demographics mate……….time and demographics…..

  103. Anon[258] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Jesus is a Jewish-Greek invention: a refinement of their Dionysus Cult, which was the ancient equivalent of cultural Marxism and just as vicious (they would murder those who got in their way).

    He is the equivalent of Adonis, Adonai, Tammuz, Dionysus, and Baachus. All of the symbolism is seasonal/calendar symbolism. It’s a Jewish cult, through and through, meant to destroy Rome via subversion of cultural standards. After Rome ejected the Jews for promoting the cult (in the form of Sabazius), and executed 7000 Dionysan cult members, the cult finally won in the more refined Christian form.

    Its the cult of the Bull, disordered life, and a rejection of law and order in favor of the Father (Aryan man, Death, Law and Order, Judgement, Protection, the Ram, the original and real god), mixing with the goddess of the East (“Easter”, Eastern women), to form mixed race. This result, the “Bull”, or Adonai, Adonis, Pan, Dionysus, and even symbolically the Minotaur (all mixed race symbolism – man and the lower beast), is the primary Jewish god that represents the Mongolian-Western admixture that we find in most Jews and Turks.

    Jews concentrate on Life, yes? That is not what it seems. The original god was death, which resulted in proper social morality, ethics, and an ordered society (think the struggle of the farmer against disorder). This is the god of oaths and judgement. His free reign is represented by the death of the Bull at the Autumn equinox. The god of life is tolerant to promote disorder (think the disordered life of spring and the forest). He is represented at the death of the lamb-ram at the vernal equinox.

  104. Anon[258] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright

    There is nothing morally wrong with just death dealing, say to the convicted and existential enemies of just law and order.

    Though, true justification and judgement of death is only the realm of the Western god who specializes in Law and Order (the Western Father). Traditionally, the culturally varied forms of this god included An, Amun, Anubis, Yama, Mitra, Mars, Tyr, etc.

    The Jewish god of (unjust) Life (Adonai, Adonis, Pan, Dionysus, etc) specializes in unjust death as a protest against the Law and Order of just Death (ie: sees nothing wrong with child sacrifice as a means of provoking an unnatural act against the natural order).

    However, the Holocaust never happened. Stating that it did would be, again, the realm of the Jewish god that despises metaphysically derived (true) law and order in favor of lies that would unjustly have innocent people persecuted for generations to the benefit of the actual murderers.

  105. Miggle says:
    @Miggle

    Double oops! Clumsy me. Or clueless me. No underline either. Trying again.

    Jacinta Price, aboriginal woman, has debunked in a few words essentially everything Tony Barta and Colin Tatz write on the subject, defending the current date of Australia Day, and urging aborigines to stop being “professional mourners”. And more. Including that “if we are pressured enough to change the date then there will be something else for aboriginal middle class activists and guilt ridden white fellas to be offended about.”

    Good summary of The Jewish War on Australian Whitefellas.

  106. But most Jews are not living on the verge of death in the United States-poor whites, blacks and Mexicans are.

    Most Jews live in fairly nice suburbs and are overdosing on heroin pills or piling up in the prisons.

    There are a few instances in New York of Jews being victimized by blacks or Mestizos, but it is really poor white proles that end up in the harm’s way of blacks.

    I don’t, for example, hear of Jewish girls being groomed by Pakistani gangs in the UK.

    For that matter, Jewish South Africans did not end up victimized in South Africa.

    Of course they have the escape hatch of Israel.

  107. Anonymous[192] • Disclaimer says:

    Be suspicious of Jewish groups who yell about the Holocaust.

    The leading Jewish groups in the US have long been against recognition of the Genocide of Christian Armenians committed by Turkey.

  108. Bukowski says:

    I first became aware of the Jew attack on free speech in 1993 when David Irving was banned from Australia. All of their talk about “democracy” and “tolerance” went out the window and it was truly sickening to see what hypocrites they are. David Irving offended Jews and was banned. Salman Rushdie offended Muslims and was allowed into Australia. Some people are more equal than others in the Australian version of “democracy”.

    https://codoh.com/library/document/2417/

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.