The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 James Kirkpatrick Archive
The Cathedral Redux: Michael Malice’s the NEW RIGHT Underestimates How Trump’s Election Has Actually Strengthened the Left—for Now
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Michael Malice’s book The New Right is interesting but he’s fundamentally wrong about the Trump presidency’s impact on American politics. “In my view, the salient thing about the Trump presidency is how he has mainstreamed several formerly marginalized strands of right-wing thought and behavior,” he writes. Yet the Republican Establishment has largely co-opted Trump. Main Stream Media journalist enforcers, financial institutions, government officials and law enforcement are now far more aggressive against dissidents on the nationalist Right. Far from being undermined, “The Cathedral,” Mencius Moldbug’s term for the interlocking network of media outlets and universities that preach the egalitarian faith and manufacture public opinion, is more demanding than ever. Maybe that’s because they’re panicking, but the fact cannot be denied.

Malice defines The New Right as:

… A loosely connected group of individuals united by their opposition to progressivism, which they perceive to be a thinly veiled fundamentalist religion dedicated to egalitarian principles and intent on totalitarian world domination via globalist hegemony.

Excitable vocabulary notwithstanding, that’s about right. As Malice himself notes, the “Alt Right,” which he defines (debatably) as those who think race is an important issue, is simply a faction within a broader movement.

Though Malice doesn’t really explore this, the “Alt Right” and “Alt Light” once worked together. The break didn’t occur until Hailgate in November 2016. The Alt Right remained a coherent force even after Charlottesville until it was essentially crushed by government action, lawfare, defunding and deplatforming.

Malice a New York Observer columnist and talk show host, is a self-described anarchist, discovered the “New Right” the same way most others did—via the libertarian-to-AltRight pipeline. On a “secret” Facebook group mostly composed of Murray Rothbard reading anarchists, he saw links to VDARE.com and American Renaissance.

Malice draws on the writings of neoreactionary Mencius Moldbug and his concept of the “Cathedral,” whose “principle of organization,” in Moldbug’s words, is “the leftward direction itself.” Malice notes that conservatism (“progressivism driving the speed limit”) can’t halt this leftward trend, citing Robert Lewis Dabney’s famous description of American conservatism as “the shadow that follows Radicalism…. towards perdition.”

Malice recounts how National Review went from comparing homosexuality to necrophilia (!) in 1996 to championing same-sex marriage in 2015. “The point isn’t how offensive such an article might be in retrospect,” Malice writes. “The point is how blithely conservatives will adopt progressive ideas and not bat an eye about it, considering the new stance a mere evolution.”

Malice writes the “New Right” can “be defined as precisely those who were driven from mainstream conservatism,” including of course, our own Peter Brimelow and John Derbyshire. For that reason, Malice is correct to say the “New Right actually isn’t all that new” and that its roots lie in the alliance between the paleolibertarians and paleoconservatives during the 1992 Buchanan campaign.

In my view, the best part of the book is Malice’s analysis of anti-democratic thinkers, including Gaetano Mosca, Georges Sorel, Robert Michels, and Vilfredo Pareto. This is covered in the same chapter that covers “game” and “pick-up artists,” and Malice makes it work.

I was taken aback when Malice said that the book he’d recommend to everyone else “was precisely the book Mencius Moldbug recommends above all others: The Machiavellians [PDF]by James Burnham.” I’d say the same. Alas, Burnham’s most influential pupil, the man Patrick J. Buchanan called the “Clausewitz of the Right,” Sam Francis, is barely mentioned, though Jim Goad and Gavin McInnes receive extensive coverage in later chapters.

Malice reports attending the 2016 VDARE Christmas Party, where “everyone at the event was quite friendly.” (We are!) He calls Adios America by party attendee Ann Coulter “the most influential book of the 2016 presidential campaign” and gives a reasonably fair accounting of our arguments.

Unfortunately, he’s also probably right that “Coulter and VDARE can be considered the furthest edge of the Overton Window.” Malice says one party attendee “blanched” when he said he was an New York Observer columnist—he no doubt feared being outed, because “supporting VDARE was akin to being gay fifty years ago; not just a firing offense but also a perversion of what is holy.” Malice’s characterization of the Left as fundamentally religious is correct.

Malice is oddly flippant when it comes to American Renaissance’s Jared Taylor. He says Taylor’s “like William F. Buckley without the smugness and smarm” and “very hard to dismiss.” Yet while Malice doesn’t straw-man Taylor himself, he does straw-man Taylor’s arguments.

Malice says that blacks’ higher crime rates could be explained by factors other than race. However, he says, it’s hard to examine these issues or fight crime even in a colorblind way when “a religion that regards any criticism of minorities as a taboo… has clout.” Yet how is that “religion” to be overcome if white identity is forbidden?

Malice bizarrely argues that IQ doesn’t equate to good countries because “the undisputable fact is that the worst butchers in human history… all came from populations that white nationalists regard as being highly intelligent.” Is this true of the genocide in Rwanda or the crimes of Idi Amin? Besides, dismissing IQ because smart people might kill you is absurd. As Garret Jones showed in Hive Mind, national IQ has a huge impact on quality of life.

Malice argues whites have fought among themselves throughout history. In response to Taylor’s argument that the Founding Fathers were essentially white nationalists, Malice says the main dividing lines during the country’s early years were the state borders themselves. Perhaps, but the North-South tensions that ultimately caused the Civil War were mostly driven by the differences between a slave society ruling over blacks and a society composed overwhelmingly of free whites. Racial diversity didn’t help.

As Jared Taylor asks, “[W]hy add problems?” To this, Malice retorts, “What country hasn’t had problems?” Ok, but the problems of Switzerland and Swaziland are different.

Malice says an overwhelmingly white state already exists—New Hampshire. “I don’t know any measure where New Hampshire can be considered some sort of Shangri-La,” sneers Malice (an adoptive New Yorker). Yet New Hampshire is being targeted by the MSM because it is “too white” and has few social problems. Compared to most Central American countries, or to some parts of California, New Hampshire isparadise.

Throughout the book, Malice refers to his Jewish identity—like Max Boot and Cathy Young, he was born in the Soviet Union and brought to the U.S. by his family presumably under the Lautenberg Amendment—and though he’s clearly willing to take a joke, he doesn’t like people who are hostile to his ethnic group. (Who does, other than affluent liberal whites?)

However, even in Israel, the self-defined “Nation-State of the Jewish People,” there are massive divisions among Jews that lead to violence. Yet it would be absurd and offensive to conclude from this that “Jewish” or “Israeli” identity isn’t important. Jews fighting amongst themselves doesn’t erase distinctions between them and non-Jews. Besides, even among Jewish Israelis, race matters.

Still, Malice makes a fascinating argument when he says the marginalization of white males may lead to increased creativity. We’ve seen that online. However, that presupposes that white males will still have an outlet for that creativity. Increasingly, any activity whites disproportionately engage in, even craft brewing, is targeted by smear campaigns.

Here, we see the book’s main problem. Malice suggests social media and technological changes allow people to get around attempts to impose control from above. However, he doesn’t really cover the repression that has occurred since President Trump’s election. Malice chronicles the rise and fall of Milo Yiannopoulos briefly but dismisses Milo’s fall as a “speedbump.” It wasn’t to Milo—or to the new audience he was introducing to Dissident Right ideas.

It’s even doubtful the Facebook group that introduced Malice to these ideas would even be suffered to exist today. If it did, undoubtedly someone would rat out the members to the MSM so we could get breathless doxes of random people.

If anything, the barriers between the “New Right” and the Conservative Movement have increased since President Trump was elected. President Trump allows the Left to claim the romantic mantle of #Resistance, without facing any actual resistance. Though he’s often called “authoritarian,” President Trump is no Caesar—he’s just Tweeter-in-Chief.

The White House staff is filled with “Never Trumpers,” to the shocked disappointment of many supporters. The main legislative accomplishment was an unpopular tax cut any Republican would have pushed. Instead of challenging racial taboos, the Republican Party is still trying to prove it is not racist. Many figures with crossover appeal between the mainstream conservative movement and the Dissident Right—Milo and also Lauren Southern–for example—no longer exist.

One key reason: the blatant Democrat mugging of the 2017 Charlottesville Unite The Right Rally and subsequent repercussions. Incredibly, though Malice meets with participants, he doesn’t analyze the political impact of Heather Heyer’s death. It’s as if he wrote that chapter the week of the rally and never revisited it.

“Charlottesville” is now something of a Sacred Myth to the “evangelical left” Malice decries, yet it goes mostly unexamined. This event increased the faith progressives have in “the Cathedral’s” message, because it created the bogeyman of a “Nazi movement” on the march.

The New Right is worth reading, but it’s surprising that it came out in May 2019. It mostly reads like something from early 2017.

The MSM hasn’t been chastened: it has grown more hysterical. “The Cathedral” is apparently far more powerful than the White House. Individuals around the country live in fear of a hit piece if they say or tweet the wrong thing.

The ideas discussed in The New Right are more marginalized than they were in 2015 because adherents are less able to express them. The sole (but important) exception is Tucker Carlson, the real leader of the American Right but someone Malice mentions only in passing.

However, one can’t argue with Malice’s conclusion. He quotes Camus on Sisyphus, who recognizes the absurdity of his condition but finds fulfillment in the struggle towards the heights.

The New Right has been suppressed through naked force. This should give us hope. If the boot slips off our necks for even a moment, victory isn’t just likely, but virtually certain. 2016 was just the beginning.

James Kirkpatrick [Email him |Tweet him @VDAREJamesK] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Alt Right, Conservative Movement, Donald Trump 
Hide 11 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. The New Right has been suppressed through naked force. This should give us hope. If the boot slips off our necks for even a moment, victory isn’t just likely, but virtually certain. 2016 was just the beginning.

    Yes, the Ctrl-Left has lost the argument. Unfortunately, that fact doesn’t guarantee they’ll lose the war … but they might, and that bare thought just tears them up inside.

  2. BCB232 says:

    I suspect the final result of the Trump presidency will be the election of a far-left candidate in 2020 – then it will be payback time and they’ll accomplish many more of their goals than Trump did. Guess we should have voted for a cuck like Jeb.
    Great article.

    • Replies: @Dutch Boy
  3. A123 says:

    Trump is pushing the ultra left to be more extreme, but it has little to do with race based campaigning (at least on his part). Trump’s popularity with all racial groups is improving (1).

    “Race also played a factor in Trump’s job approval rating. Hispanics, this time around, were much more likely to approve of his job performance (49% approve/51% disapprove), while the president also saw his numbers jump with African Americans. This was his second straight poll with over a quarter support from African Americans (28% approve/70% disapprove). If Trump wins half of Hispanics and a quarter of African Americans in 2020, Democrats will be in trouble!”

    The push to the ultra extreme left is more about his ability to beat the Fake Stream Media, forcing positive coverage of Main Street issues. Nothing generates hatred and anger among Authoritarians more than the Truth getting out to the people. Their entire fragile house of cards is based on the use of deception to pit groups of Americans against each other. And, the numbers show that this is no longer working.

    PEACE 😇
    _____

    (1) https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/zogby-poor-performances-of-democrats-boost-trumps-approval-to-51-up-with-blacks-hispanics

  4. Dutch Boy says:
    @BCB232

    Maybe 2024 (Texas may have flipped by then).

  5. Anon[664] • Disclaimer says:

    We aren’t actually egalitarian. America has tremendous economic inequality. We are a society where the elites manipulate the masses for their own will to power. The GOP and businesses want cheap labor, Democrats want votes, and ethnic minorities are motivated by ethnic nationalism. Calls for equality are mostly just a disguise for ruthless self-interest.

    The left also tries to divide and conquer Whites in a variety of ways, one of which is to demonize White men. That strategy has mostly failed because most White women voted for Trump. However, the so-called men’s rights movement is the flipside of contemporary feminism and it demonizes White women, usually relying on pseudo-scientific arguments. They have been much more successful at driving away both White men and White women from any White nationalist movement.

    The alt-right was never a coherent force and was always just a small group of internet trolls. It was entirely the creation of liberal media hype. If it was a genuine White nationalist movement it wouldn’t be celebrating non-White pick-up artists like Roosh who brag about raping White women. I saw that Guillaume Durocher recently directed his readers to learn how to be men from Roosh. That speaks for itself.

    You even take a shot at the South and evangelicals, even though that region has until recently always been the source of White racial consciousness in America. The nation of immigrants started in the North and is largely a consequence of modern capitalism.

  6. Anon[664] • Disclaimer says:

    We aren’t actually egalitarian. America has tremendous economic inequality. We are a society where the elites manipulate the masses for their own will to power. The GOP and businesses want cheap labor, Democrats want votes, and ethnic minorities are motivated by ethnic nationalism. Calls for equality are mostly just a disguise for ruthless self-interest.

    The left also tries to divide and conquer Whites in a variety of ways, one of which is to demonize White men. That strategy has mostly failed because most White women voted for Trump. However, the so-called men’s rights movement is the flipside of contemporary feminism and it demonizes White women, usually relying on pseudo-scientific arguments. They have been much more successful at driving away both White men and White women from any White nationalist movement.

    The alt-right was never a coherent force and was always just a small group of internet trolls. It was entirely the creation of liberal media hype. If it was a genuine White nationalist movement it wouldn’t be celebrating non-White pick-up artists like Roosh who brag about raping White women. I saw that Guillaume Durocher recently directed his readers to learn how to be men from Roosh. That speaks for itself.

    You even take a little shot at the South and evangelicals, even though that region has until recently always been the source of White racial consciousness in America. The nation of immigrants started in the North and is largely a consequence of modern capitalism.

  7. anon[339] • Disclaimer says:

    Trump’s science denialism–with both the environment and climate change–is greatly strengthening the Left.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    , @anon
  8. @anon

    “Science” today is a government grant-seeking cargo cult.

    This “banned” former Ted Talk may help you open your eyes that have been closed by the mass media and university brainwashing.

    There is so much to learn–once your mind has been freed from its chains.

    You _can_ be part of the solution instead of part of the problem.

    (Rupert Sheldrake–The Science Delusion)

    • Replies: @anon
  9. anon[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Justvisiting

    Anti-science rhetoric = Sour grapes.

    BTW, I’ve already watched it. The guy believes in “mysterious telepathy-type interconnections between organisms and of collective memories within species.” (His own words.) Mystical magic that has no scientific evidence. Thus, more Sour Grapes from Sheldrake.

  10. KenH says:

    Malice notes that conservatism (“progressivism driving the speed limit”) can’t halt this leftward trend,

    Conservatism as progressivism driving the speed limit is a good one and apropos. Contemporary conservatism (cuckservatism) essentially wants to impose all of the things that the (((radical left))) does but at a slower pace and in smaller doses so as not to alarm the hoi polloi.

    One example is the gun control debate. It wasn’t long ago that conservatives largely opposed red flag laws, universal background checks and so called “common sense” gun laws as nothing more than back door confiscations. Now the left is pushing the illegalization and confiscation of any gun with a detachable magazine that holds more than five rounds and the conservatives, led by el Trumpo, are instead pushing red flag laws, universal background checks and “common sense” gun laws.

    (((Conservatism, inc.))) also welcomes white minority status and believes its much ado about nothing so long as we have free markets and everyone swears fealty to the cohenstitution.

  11. anon[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Example of how Trump can’t grasp science, then stupidly denies it.

    Unfortunately, Trump got his wish for more global warming, fast and hard. In spite of the paradoxical polar vortex blasts caused by global warming, January 2019 was the third warmest January in the history of human existence, and both June 2019 and July 2019 were the warmest. There is no sea ice within 155 miles of Alaska. Unprecedented thunderstorms and lightning at the North Pole. Paris, France roasting at 109°F. And his Midwest White farmer base suffering under the wettest Spring ever recorded, another consequence of global warming, tweeting #noplant19.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All James Kirkpatrick Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?