The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Patrick McDermott Archive
South Africa’s Protection Racket
Rainbow Nation shows its colors
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

South Africa is an ongoing topic of concern among the dissident right, which views it as a cautionary tale about the dangers of becoming a minority in your own country. The Rainbow Nation has been largely ignored by the mainstream media since the end of apartheid, but last year Donald Trump scandalized the global establishment by highlighting it in a tweet.

Predictably, the media coverage was overwhelmingly negative. One response came from a transplanted American white woman living in South Africa, Eve Fairbanks, who wrote an article for Politico entitled “Trust Me, Donald Trump, White South Africans are Doing Fine.”

In it, she wrote about an email she received from a concerned friend who lived in America. “I didn’t know what to say because it was all so far from the truth that it beggared belief,” she wrote. “The reality they under-report is that white life is amazing.”

“In the context of South Africa,” she continued, “fearing or predicting a massacre of whites there allows whites elsewhere to act like the kind of people who possibly ought to be massacred.” It was a stunning and chilling statement, particularly coming from a Jewish woman.

The reality of South Africa’s farm murders is as well-documented as it is horrific. Fairbanks nevertheless makes a broader point that should not be ignored. What about the rest of South Africa’s whites? Are they really doing as well as she says?

The answer is no. In fact, there is good reason to believe that the plight of the nation’s Afrikaner farmers is foreshadowing worse to come for the entire white population. Understanding why, however, requires better understanding the nation’s notoriously corrupt and increasingly dangerous political and economic situation.

No one is safe

South Africa’s farm murders are part of a much larger crime problem. The nation’s homicide rate is already among the highest in the world and it has been increasing since 2011. Most of it is concentrated in poor black townships.

Nyanga, a township outside Cape Town, is a one of the most dangerous in the country. “I have been robbed more times than I can remember, says Sandiso Phaliso, a longtime resident. “Fortunately, I am still alive although I have been stabbed on a number of occasions and bear the scars.”

“Five of my friends have been killed over the last three years,” he says. “They were too drunk to defend themselves.”

South Africa’s violent crime is overwhelmingly black-on-black or black-on-white. Almost all of the convicts in its prisons are either black (79.6%) or mixed race (18.2%).

Homicides account for just three percent of the much larger number of violent crimes committed every year. The rate of rape is the highest in the world (at least among countries that publish plausible statistics). Police are ineffectual, often corrupt, and sometimes a criminal menace themselves. Vigilantism is common in the townships, where mobs routinely beat and often kill the violent criminals who roam their communities, sometimes using the gruesome practice of necklacing.

Urban whites are safer than poor blacks, but only because of herculean efforts to protect themselves that leave them virtually imprisoned. The vast majority live in (and stick to) heavily segregated, largely white areas of the cities and suburbs, often in apartment buildings with security services and cameras, and in gated communities. The nation’s citizens employ more private security than its police and army combined. Highs walls, razor wire, and dogs are affordable alternatives. According to some estimates, more than half of homes have such security measures.

Every journey outside is risky. Smash and grab artists roam the streets and can rob through a car window in seconds. Tourist areas are heavily protected. According to one resident, Cape Town’s waterfront “is well lit, rigorously patrolled by private security guards, and has over 800 CCTV cameras that are centrally monitored by a control room that can dispatch armed security or medical services to any point within minutes.”

In other parts of the city, pickpockets and street urchins are pervasive. Visitors are warned to remain in well-traveled, well-lit areas. Outside these areas, “things get less safe pretty quickly.” Indeed, most South Africans feel unsafe walking around their own neighborhoods after dark.

Many avoid going out altogether. “Life in Johannesburg mostly happens indoors,” says Dan Roodt, an Afrikaner activist. “You move from one secure environment and one security complex to another. Or you could move from a gated community to a shopping center. Everything is guarded.”

Politics: the deadly game

Bongani Skhosan, a young black candidate for a low-level city council position in the Umziwabantu municipality, got in his pick-up truck. It was just another Monday morning and he was taking his kids to school. He probably never saw the gunmen coming.

Two head shots ended it quickly. His children watched their father die.

Political violence is commonplace in South Africa, particularly in predominantly black areas such as KwaZulu-Natal. Disruption of political gatherings, threats, and beatings are a regular occurrence, especially when elections are close. Police usually do little to stop it and sometimes they are active participants. Killing is normally a last resort, but it has been a growing phenomenon. There have been at least 90 political assassinations since 2016, double the rate of the previous 15 years.

The reason is simple: money. For many black South Africans, politics is the only realistic path to wealth and many are more than willing to kill for it. For those that do, the payoff can be substantial.

While there are many contributors to the nation’s corruption, one of the most important is Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), a national policy rolled out over the past twenty years that gives economic preferences to businesses with substantial black ownership. The result has been a series of sweetheart deals with white-owned businesses that have made leading black political leaders instantly rich in exchange for inside access and political protection.

Cyril Ramaphosa, the nation’s current president, chaired a commission that helped develop BEE. Today he is one of the wealthiest men in the country, with a net worth of R6.4 billion ($550 million). Numerous political families have also benefitted, including those of Jacob Zuma and Nelson Mandela, but they are not the only ones. By 2015, an estimated R350 billion ($24 billion) in BEE deals had been done by the top 100 companies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. By the end of 2013, about 23 percent of its market capitalization was held by Black Economic Empowerment groups, a figure that is probably higher today.

Politically-connected black entrepreneurs who miss out on BEE deals have other options. Some become wealthy with government contracts, known locally as “tenders.” Tenders usually combine high prices and poor delivery, which helps make the recipients rich, but they are an exceptionally bad deal for the public.

“For your business to survive and thrive, you must know a politician,” one black tenderpreneur told The New York Times. “If I didn’t have the networks and the access to resources, I wouldn’t be where I am.”

Cronyism spills further down the food chain through widespread political hiring in government agencies and state-owned enterprises. The result is a government that barely functions. Pervasive incompetence and corruption have hobbled the police, social services, health care, education, municipal services, and the military. Years of mismanagement at Eskom, the state-owned energy utility, has produced a broken system that subjects the nation to intermittent power outages.

The primary purpose of these dysfunctional governmental agencies and state-owned businesses is to prop up the ruling African National Congress (ANC). These entities employ most of the nation’s relatively small black middle class. They also provide leverage over the poor, who are afraid to vote the wrong way for fear of losing social grants, pensions, access to public housing, food assistance, and low-paying jobs on public projects.

For the lucky few at the top, however, the system has brought sudden wealth and appalling levels of indulgence. Newly-minted “BEE men” are constantly one-upping each other with flashy suits, new cars, and cases of Chivas Regal and Dom Perignon. Kenny Kunene, one of the nation’s wealthiest black businessmen, arguably outshined them all with extravagant birthday parties that featured guests eating sushi off the bellies of half-naked women.

BMWs, the favored ride, are so ubiquitous that locals say the acronym stands for “black man’s wishes.” Vusi Nzapheza, a black columnist, says it is not unusual to see one parked next to a shack. “In some quarters, a car is mightier than a house,” he wrote. “A BMW is a panty-dropper while a bonded house is unlikely to get you laid on a Saturday night.”

Unsurprisingly, given the many opportunities for illicit gain, political campaigns in some parts of the country are beginning to look like gang wars. Contract killings, complete with hit lists, are becoming more frequent. Criminal gangs are often called upon to do the job to hide the identity of the true perpetrators.

Some are resigned to the changed landscape .”When you get involved in ANC party politics in Mpumalanga,” wrote one local journalist, “you know you may be killed.”

White Monopoly Capital

Superficially, most whites in South Africa are better off than most blacks, most of whom are poor. The white unemployment rate, 7.1 percent in 2018, is substantially lower than that of blacks (31.1%), mixed race or “colored” people (21.8%), and Indians/Asians (10.1%). Such comparisons are probably the best evidence for Eve Fairbanks’s claim that “white life is amazing.”

These statistics are misleading. Most whites face substantial discrimination due to government-imposed affirmative action. A 2017 survey by the liberal-leaning Institute of Race Relations found that 53 percent of white South Africans had personally experienced racism directed toward them, a figure more than double the 23 percent of black people who said the same thing. Moreover, after years of being forced out of government jobs, whites are now just 7.5 percent of the public workforce, a level below their proportion of the population.

What explains their relatively low unemployment? First, whites do better in the private sector, where for-profit corporate employers rely on their skills and formal education in management and professional positions to make a profit. Second, they excel in small business. About half the nation’s formally-registered small businesses are white-owned.

The deciding factor in each case is competence, something that can easily be seen by comparing the performance of the public and private sectors. Ilana Mercer, author of Into the Cannibal’s Pot, said a black editor of the Sunday Times once candidly admitted as much. “My African colleagues who manage large companies or government departments tell me that to get a job done, you usually have to employ a white,” he said.

This skill differential is not enough by itself to protect white jobs, however. The private sector is not immune from affirmative action laws. Left-leaning governmental bodies like the South Africa Human Rights Commission have called for stronger measures to address the remaining racial imbalances in private industry, but they have not been imposed, at least not yet.

Why not? The reason has little to do with the power of whites as a voting block. White voters are principally represented in parliament by the Democratic Alliance (DA), a liberal, multi-racial party that historically opposed apartheid and only holds about a fifth of the seats. The modern embodiment of the old Afrikaner Conservative Party, called Freedom Front Plus, holds just four of the four hundred seats in the National Assembly. All told, these parties are overwhelmingly outnumbered by the two major black-dominated parties, the ANC and a smaller black nationalist party called the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF). In a nation that is 80 percent black and only eight percent white, democracy provides little protection.

As is so often the case, the real answer can be found by following the money. Hints can be found in a phrase that much of the world’s corporate establishment (or at least The New York Times) views as disreputable: “white monopoly capital.” This theory, generally backed by left-leaning politicians and academics, posits that the same white industrialists who once ruled South Africa under apartheid still rule it today. Despite its leftist pedigree, the idea appears to be well-grounded in fact.

More than two decades after the end of apartheid, the ranks of South Africa’s richest families remain largely the same, a reality broken only by a few token black BEE millionaires. Nicky Oppenheimer, whose family ran the De Beers diamond company for decades, tops the list. The connections between his family, the Jewish-dominated diamond industry, and the Rothschilds provide plenty to chew on for the conspiracy-minded.

Credit Image: © Richard B. Levine/Levine Roberts/Newscom via ZUMA Press
Credit Image: © Richard B. Levine/Levine Roberts/Newscom via ZUMA Press

Such explanations, however, are incomplete. Only about a quarter of South Africa’s wealthiest individuals are Jewish. Moreover, although he objects to the characterization, the most prominent example of white monopoly capital is a Calvinist Afrikaner named Johann Rupert. The nation’s second richest man, his wealth includes ownership of international luxury goods makers like Cartier and most of the nation’s corporate media.

His father, Anton Rupert, was a member of the Broederbond, a secretive Afrikaner brotherhood that dominated the ruling National Party during the apartheid era. Johann grew up in Stellenbosch, a leafy wine country town anchored by an elite university where he and many of the nation’s wealthy scions went to school. These connections form the core of an allegedly all-powerful business network, called the “Stellenbosch mafia,” which has reputedly used BEE payoffs and secret donations to keep the ANC’s black leadership in line.

Whatever the real or imagined influence of this group, few dispute that the two most powerful families, the Oppenheimers and Ruperts, played a central role in ending apartheid. Harry Oppenheimer, Nicky’s father, organized a conference of business leaders in 1976 to address racial issues after the Soweto uprising. The following year, he helped create the Urban Foundation to support the business community’s agenda and develop future black leaders. Cyril Ramaphosa, South Africa’s current president, was among its first recruits. Oppenheimer also played a key role in drumming up international opposition. In 1960, he met with Britain’s prime minister, Harold MacMillan, before he delivered a famous speech that called apartheid into question. In the early 1980s, he hosted Henry Kissinger in a visit to discuss ways to end it.

Despite his enormous wealth and influence, however, Oppenheimer was something of an outsider in South African politics. During the apartheid era, he supported the Progressive Party, the National Party’s principal political opposition. Anton Rupert, Johann’s father, arguably played the larger role because, unlike Oppenheimer, he was working to undermine apartheid from within the ruling party.

At the time, Anton Rupert was a leading financier of the Nationalists and a member of its inner circle. His son Johann was a friend and supporter of F.W. de Klerk, who in 1989 was elected to lead the party just as international sanctions were beginning to take a heavy toll. The party was also heavily dependent on corporate funding, which further weakened its resolve. When Anton Rupert urged it to bury “the stinking corpse of apartheid,” saying it was bad for business, the party listened.

These two powerful families and the nation’s other wealthy industrialists were the people that de Klerk was serving when he ended apartheid. In 1992, when he called a whites-only referendum to endorse his negotiations with the ANC, he was strongly backed by both the business community and the corporate and government-controlled media. The opposition, underfunded and denied media coverage, lost badly. Mandela did not win power on his own, it was given to him. Two years later, he was elected president.

The nation’s business elite did not hand over control to the ANC unchecked, however. While de Klerk willingly traded away political protections for ordinary Afrikaners and Anglos who were now a minority, he worked feverishly to protect business interests. He utilized a variety of tools, including constitutional protections, debt service agreements, international trade rules, and IMF assistance to handcuff Mandela and his successor, Thabo Mbeki.

Mandela changed after hobnobbing with the globalist jet set in Davos. During and after his negotiations with de Klerk, he and Mbeki regularly consulted with their ally, Harry Oppenheimer. In gratitude, Mandela later spoke out in defense of De Beers corporate interests. He called Oppenheimer’s contribution “monumental” after his death.

Some on the radical left were less impressed. “No man walks out of prison after 27 years and then becomes the president unless there is a script and a plan behind the scenes,” Khalid Muhammad, a Nation of Islam and New Black Panther Party leader, told Phil Donahue in 1994.

The business community’s capture of the ANC seemed complete, at least until Jacob Zuma, a corrupt character who looks and acts like Jabba the Hutt, seized the presidency in 2009. Zuma and his merry band of cronies, including the notorious Gupta brothers, then proceeded to loot the state, scandalizing the establishment in the process. Zuma held on for eight long years, but in 2017 the business elite struck back. Their protégé, Cyril Ramaphosa, defeated Zuma’s anointed successor in an ANC party contest and recaptured the presidency in early 2018.

Unlike the 1990s, the business community no longer advertises its influence in black-dominated South Africa. Johann Rupert knows he is “toxic” and he denies any involvement with the government. Responding to the EFF’s Julius Malema, who claims he is the real power behind the throne, Rupert joked that if Malema “doesn’t stop lying about me, I’m going to tell the world that I actually do give him money.”

True power is often invisible. Results sometimes are not. After his election, Ramaphosa called for an end to the phrase “white monopoly capital” and said “we should treat our entrepreneurs as heroes.” He has since matched his rhetoric with action, making business-friendly appointments to key government positions.

For now, the white population gets to keep their private sector jobs, but their safety comes at a price. South Africa’s business elite is not saving them out of any genuine concern for their well-being. This is the same group that brought in black miners to break white miners’ unions a century ago and later worked to end apartheid in a way that only protected themselves. They do not care about Afrikaner farmers or the growing number of poor whites in squatter camps.

They care about money. In a country riven by corruption and incompetence, they desperately need a skilled labor force. They only care about the white population if they help make them rich. Like the nation’s burgeoning security industry and its legions of BEE men, white monopoly capital is just another part of the South African protection racket.

Danger on the horizon

Attie Potgieter, a white farmer, fell dead outside his home, cut and stabbed 151 times with a panga and knives. His two-year old daughter, Wilmien, ran to his side. She was shot in the head execution style. Her mother, Wilna, was found dead inside the house.

“We have killed them. We are coming back,” read the note on the gate. These are the wages of betrayal.

There may be more to come. When Cyril Ramaphosa sought the ANC top position in late 2017, defeating one of Jacob Zuma’s ex-wives, it was a narrow victory. The race was evenly split, pitting those who benefitted from Zuma’s corrupt rule against those who did not. At the time, the balance of power rested with a gangster politician from Mpumalanga named David Mabuza.

Mabuza had worked his way up through the ANC in the usual way, stealing education money from the children of his province to line the pockets of supporters. Like many ANC politicians, he has been accused of ordering hits on those who got in his way – including Jimmy Mohlala, a local politician who had exposed graft in the province and was ruthlessly gunned down. In 2017, he saw an opportunity in the Ramaphosa-Zuma contest and made his appointment to the deputy presidency the price of his support. Ramaphosa paid the devil his due.

Mabuza later said of Ramaphosa, “We’ll rally around him as a leader and we’re going to walk next to him. He’s very safe with me next to him.” It must have been cold comfort. Many believe the nation’s deputy president is a stone-cold killer.

Cyril Ramaphosa and David Mabuza
Cyril Ramaphosa and David Mabuza

Many of the nation’s wealthy elite are no longer taking any chances. In late 2018, Johann Rupert, who has reportedly grown disillusioned with South Africa, announced a major expansion of his luxury lines in China. In 2011, the Oppenheimer family sold its stake in De Beers to Anglo American, a long-time partner, to diversify their holdings.

They are not alone. Between 2007 and 2015, over 40 percent of the nation’s white millionaires left the country. Over seven percent of the entre white population has emigrated since 2002 – mostly skilled professionals, tradespeople, entrepreneurs and experienced corporate employees and their families. They are part of a larger brain drain that has hit the nation hard. Undoubtedly, more would leave if they could. Unlike Zimbabwe in the 1980s, there is no safer country to the south for whites to run to.

While many of the nation’s most productive citizens are leaving, millions of poor and uneducated migrants are pouring in from the rest of Africa. There are currently an estimated 2-5 million illegal immigrants in the country, most from nearby nations like Zimbabwe, Mozambique, and the Congo. The numbers are still manageable and current population projections assume this will not change, but that assumption is questionable.

The United Nations projects that sub-Saharan Africa’s population will grow to over four billion by the end of this century, with the world’s black population approaching that of the rest of the world combined. Polls already show that over half of those living in many poor black countries want to emigrate to the West. It is inconceivable that this will not affect South Africa.

Meanwhile, service delivery protests by the nation’s poor are a daily occurrence and trouble is brewing on its increasingly radical college campuses. According to a 2017 poll, 61 percent of blacks say South Africa is “now a country for black Africans and whites must take second place.”

“We’re sitting on a serious time bomb,” Bongi Vilakazi, a black businessman, told The New York Times. “Everyone I talk to is of the mind that we need to take what is rightfully ours.”

How long can this go on? Some, like Simon Roche of Suidlanders, a civil defense group, think South Africa may be on the brink of civil war. Even the establishment-backed South African Institute of Race Relations is sounding alarms, calling the current demonization of farmers a dangerous left turn by Ramaphosa and his supporters.

Frans Cronje, the organization’s CEO, has mapped out several future scenarios, but he thinks the most likely is one where the nation breaks up into semi-autonomous enclaves divided along racial, class and ethnic lines. He also sees political danger on the horizon. If the ANC fails to win 50 percent of the vote, either in 2019 or thereafter, he thinks they may be forced into an alliance with the EFF and Julius Malema, who has infamously committed to “cutting the throat of whiteness.” This would drive the government even further left, possibly producing an economic crisis like the one in Venezuela, where millions have fled to other countries.

Such a crisis, however, could open the door to white independence. In a 2016 interview, Dan Roodt dismissed the possibility that a breakaway effort would be suppressed, arguing that the South African military has become dysfunctional and inept under ANC leadership. “We have always been outnumbered. I don’t think that’s the problem,” he said. “Only other whites could endanger us.”

“There would have been some sort of revolt a long time ago already if it weren’t for the fact that people here are really scared of the USA and the European Union – and military action from them on the side of the ANC,” he said. “The more Europe and North America gets embroiled in their own multicultural problems, the more space it will open up for us here.”

Politicians like Donald Trump and the national populists of Europe have roiled the body politic, but neoliberal and neoconservative elites still hold significant power. The same global forces that once broke South Africa are working to do the same thing to every Western country. If they succeed, South Africa’s protection racket could await us all.

The natural

In a nation plagued by corruption and decay, the financial district of Sandton in Johannesburg is a startling contrast. This is the commercial heart of South Africa’s business elite. Its gleaming office towers and luxury shopping emanate a kind of discordant vibrance, as if it were a vampire sucking the life from the rest of the country.

Sandton. (Credit Image: © Xinhua via ZUMA Wire)
Sandton. (Credit Image: © Xinhua via ZUMA Wire)

The surrounding city better reflects the nation as a whole. The downtown is marked by crumbling buildings and urban rot. The skyline is dominated by Ponte tower, an overcrowded tenement that once held ten stories of trash in its open core. The building’s brutalist aura is so dystopian that it was used in a movie about a coming zombie apocalypse.

The inner courtyard of the Ponte City tower in Johannesburg. (Credit Image: © Julia Naue/DPA via ZUMA Press)
The inner courtyard of the Ponte City tower in Johannesburg. (Credit Image: © Julia Naue/DPA via ZUMA Press)

The region’s black townships are worse – a wasteland of crime, drugs, and garbage. In 2008, the filmmaker Louis Theroux interviewed one of the residents, a carjacker named Maleven. He and a companion bragged that they had taken four cars the night before and were no strangers to home invasion. Theroux asked how they convinced their victims to hand over their money.

“You never give me? You never give me?” Maleven answered defiantly.

“I take your wife and put a knife here, like example,” he said, pointing to his neck. “You see the blood. I say ‘I finish up now! You don’t give me money or you give me?’ What can you say?”

“You will give me. No other way.”

This is Africa in its purest form. The devil’s bargain facing the white population is no less clear: “Make me rich or you die.”

Maleven was later arrested and subsequently killed in jail by his fellow inmates, which is a shame. He might have made a good politician.

Mr. McDermott is a political analyst in Washington, DC.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 95 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. ‘…“There would have been some sort of revolt a long time ago already if it weren’t for the fact that people here are really scared of the USA and the European Union – and military action from them on the side of the ANC,” …’

    That could get interesting. Most of our elite combat troops are white themselves.

    • Replies: @Tom Welsh
    , @L Woods
  2. Wally says:

    ‘Only a quarter of SA’s wealthiest are Jews’?

    Says who?

    Define “wealthiest”.

    Most Jews do not identify as “Jews” in religious surveys, censuses … when the question is even permitted.

    In fact they are told not to be counted by their own.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Antonius
  3. Great article.Whites were purposely put in this situation by the Christ hating thus White hating Jews.Time and time again we see the Jew behind just about every tragedy the White race has suffered.They are literally Satan’s agents on Earth and they target Whites because they hate Christ and we are his children.I despise them but really cannot understand Whites who accept money and power to sell out their own kind.It is truly sickening to think how low some will go to achieve material possessions.May the Oppenheimers and Ruperts burn in Hell together for what they have done to our kinsmen.It is being done to all White countries.May God deliver us from this.Thank you Mr.McDermott for giving all of us the very important gift of knowledge we must have to overcome this evil enemy.Without knowledge the brainwashed masses merely punch at the air or the targets chosen by the Jew media.I am particularly saddened that White nations under Jewish control(U.S.,U.K.)have been used to harm our own people in Rhodesia,South Africa and Germany.We must never give up and final victory will be ours.We then must make sure such evil never harms our people again.God bless the author and all readers on this site,truly a blessing.

    • Agree: Druid
    • Replies: @Reuben Kaspate
    , @mr meener
  4. This is coming to America and sooner than you think. Read the following article from the Yale News. You won’t believe it:

    https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2019/02/07/davis-marks-evil-is-banal/

    Could you imagine what would happen if a white person wrote that about a black boy? Of course, it wouldn’t be published in the Yale New now would it!

    Here’s another article about the hoax committed by Smollett and how the police are afraid to charge him with the crime because blacks will riot.

    https://pjmedia.com/trending/none-dare-call-it-a-hoax-the-jussie-smollett-saga-continues/

    You are just one incident away from this cesspool called America perhaps exploding.

    • Replies: @joeshittheragman
  5. Whitewolf says:

    Surely no one expected things to get better with apartheid gone? You only have to look at the rest of Africa to see what would happen.

  6. gT says:

    Excellent article, I’ll forgive the author for forgetting about the KhoiSan, the only true indigenous inhabitants of Southern Africa, because I want to make a suggestion: that the US and Europe can kick their Hispanics and Muslims and assorted other African rapefugee trash out if in return South Africa can kick its beloved White trash colonizers out. That is fair is it not?

    Actually its not fair, us savages in South Africa are going to be kick our White trash colonizers out anyway because it is in our nature, but the Hispanics and Muslims and Africans in Europe are never leaving and are in fact going to increase in numbers because the Jews want it so.

    Bwa! ha! ha! ha! ha!

    Actually the Jews can’t be bothered about the Whites in South Africa because Blacks are easier to manage, something about making the right choice when it comes to the “lead or gold” persuasive argument. The Jews also won’t allow separate semi-autonomous enclaves in South Africa, they want Globalization with the One World Government remember!

    The more Blacks the merrier, the lower the IQ the easier it is for the “true” Elites to govern, so countries with high IQ must be turned into low IQ, the browning is a negligible side effect, White sperm and eggs can always be kept on ice for the future production of female entertainment. “Hierarchical society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance” – 1984

    • Replies: @kula
  7. The attempt to draw parallels between South Africa and the US is nonsensical. The Whites were never more than a tiny minority and it thus never was “their” country! According to Wikipedia, 79% of the population is Black, 8% “Coloured” (i.e. of mixed race), 8% White and 2% Asian. There is thus no parallel with the modern US, where the colonists largely exterminated the native peoples and introduced African slaves.

  8. RouterAl says:

    Shame on that white girl having food eaten off her. She cannot be that poor.

    • Replies: @Tom Welsh
    , @dvorak
  9. So is South Africa another case of capitalists backing communists?

    I get it that this has indeed been so in other cases, but I cannot explain how it serves capitalist interests and leads to them maximising their profits. Or if there is some other agenda behind it greater than profits that serves capitalist interests.

    I mean I can present evidence of this from the Russian revolution onwards but I can’t quite explain why?

  10. Tom Welsh says:

    “The reason is simple: money. For many black South Africans, politics is the only realistic path to wealth and many are more than willing to kill for it. For those that do, the payoff can be substantial”.

    In other words, American-style “freedom and democracy” are flourishing in South Africa. The root axiom of the American way of life is that money is the universal value, and the more of it you have – however acquired – the more virtuous you are. Hence the supremely ambiguous expression “net worth”.

  11. Tom Welsh says:

    “You move from one secure environment and one security complex to another. Or you could move from a gated community to a shopping center. Everything is guarded.”

    I imagine this describes the kind of life Eve Fairbanks lives. Bien-pensant “liberal” Democrats do not live on farms, and if possible they avoid the countryside altogether. It’s muddy, messy, icky, and full of nasty animals and poor people. Not to mention Nature, of which they strongly disapprove.

  12. Tom Welsh says:

    “Only about a quarter of South Africa’s wealthiest individuals are Jewish”.

    “Only”…

    Whereas South Africa’s approximately 69,500 Jewish people comprise about 1.26 percent of the nation’s total population.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_population_by_country#Table

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  13. Tom Welsh says:
    @RouterAl

    Although she wears a professional smile, it disturbing that she appears to be handcuffed to the table.

    • Replies: @Matthias Eckert
  14. Tom Welsh says:
    @Colin Wright

    There has been news recently of South African whites asking Russia to give them citizenship so they can employ their farming skills there.

    That looks like a win-win-win, as the South Africans would be safe while Russia would benefit from their vast experience and their undoubted character strengths.

    And if the South African government, and the majority who vote for it, want to get rid of white people, the sooner it is done (and taken to its logical conclusion) the better.

    Then South Africans will get their wish, and the rest of us can see the outcome of this interesting social experiment.

  15. Tom Welsh says:

    “Its gleaming office towers and luxury shopping emanate a kind of discordant vibrance, as if it were a vampire sucking the life from the rest of the country”.

    Just like all financial centres everywhere (including the USA and UK).

  16. Tom Welsh says:
    @Michael Kenny

    Indeed, it seems to me that the position of the whites in South Africa is getting closer and closer to that of the Native Americans.

    Both groups were very small minorities overwhelmed by the vastly greater numbers of others who took over the country.

    One hopes that the white South Africans will manage to escape the fate of 99 percent of Native Americans – although those refugee camps do sound distressingly like Native American “reservations”.

    • Replies: @Rogue
  17. anon[393] • Disclaimer says:

    Obviously its hit the point it cant be reversed or remain as is but america has also been this was for a few decades same deal elites betraying their own with jew connivance eventually you reach the tipping point where war becomes inevitable unfortunately the elite hold on to the military and the cucks to their hopes etc so long that by the time war comes it will be armageddon like hundreds of millions will die hopefully whites will survive and slants will not take advantage, if elites can continue to seize control of all communication and privacy maybe they will be able to enslave us totally but they are reaching points of tension they might not be able to handle the muds are trying to take over and the deep state is alienating some leftists

    • Replies: @William Badwhite
  18. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @Walter Duranty

    Not disputing your take, but this sentence seems needless, even force-fit:

    “This would drive the government even further left, possibly producing an economic crisis like the one in Venezuela, where millions have fled to other countries.”

    Why would the author want readers to associate Venezuela — the Empire’s newest target — with the reported atrocities in South Africa?

    • Replies: @Negrolphin Pool
  19. @Wally

    There would only be a small fraction of all Jews who felt bound by some obscure religious objection to being counted who would fail to identify themselves as Jews on those grounds but it would be hard to mount a conclusive argument one way or the other whether exaggerating their number in America, or elsewhere, or minimising their number would serve some supposed ethnic interest.

    • Replies: @Wally
  20. Anonymous[846] • Disclaimer says:

    The nation’s citizens employ more private security than its police and army combined. Highs walls, razor wire, and dogs are affordable alternatives. According to some estimates, more than half of homes have such security measures.

    That probably includes all “homes” in SA. I’ve lived in Johannesburg for a few years and didn’t meet a single white person who didn’t live behind a high wall. Most of us lived in “complexes” – which is a walled, gated cluster of residential units with patrolling guards, electrical (non-lethal) fence on top of the wall and private, armed response units on call.

    most South Africans feel unsafe walking around their own neighborhoods after dark.

    Not applicable in Johannesburg. No white person walks around their neighbourhood day or night. You walk inside your “complex” to your car and then drive to another secure area. Public transport is mostly informal and completely unsafe for whites.

    Such a crisis, however, could open the door to white independence. In a 2016 interview, Dan Roodt dismissed the possibility that a breakaway effort would be suppressed, arguing that the South African military has become dysfunctional and inept under ANC leadership. “We have always been outnumbered. I don’t think that’s the problem,” he said. “Only other whites could endanger us.”

    He’s a moron. Small arms infantry are no match for tanks, planes and artillery – “dysfunctional” or not.

    The same global forces that once broke South Africa are working to do the same thing to every Western country. If they succeed, South Africa’s protection racket could await us all.

    Worse. If we allow it, the white race will be genocided much more overtly at some point.

  21. dvorak says:
    @RouterAl

    Shame on that white girl having food eaten off her. She cannot be that poor.

    In the Christian past, acting/modeling was considered sordid, on the continuum of prostitution.

    Consider that the next time you attend a high school musical.

    Naked-woman-sushi-platter is supposed to be humiliating, anyway, not fun ‘n sexy. It originated as a way for gangsters to humiliate a debtor by forcing his daughter/wife to participate. The Japanese cringe when they see foreigners unwittingly turning this horror into humor.

  22. dvorak says:
    @Anonymous

    Small arms infantry are no match for tanks, planes and artillery – “dysfunctional” or not.

    Tanks? What if an SA nigger drives his tank with the top open and his head sticking out? 😀

    Planes? What if SA niggers leave their airfield lightly guarded at night. Those planes will never again leave the ground.

    Artillery? Can SA niggers defend a supply line that is under attack? What will they fire out of the artillery, human feces?

  23. @niteranger

    because blacks will riot.
    ———————–
    Nah, it’s not riot season yet.

  24. Heros says:

    One of my favorite people alive is Dr. Peter Hammond, a South African missionary who has fought and worked for the welfare of Blacks across Africa for his entire life. Yet he is branded as a racist by many for standing up firmly against the white genocide going on in South Africe.

    He has had an incredible life, and I listen to him whenever I see some new material. Here is a list of interviews of him by AHC, pick any one that looks interesting and I will guarantee that you will learn a lot:

    https://andrewcarringtonhitchcock.com/?s=hammond

    • Replies: @Rogue
  25. Hitler was right. If there is no nation than there cannot be a state.

  26. fnn says:

    I think you left out the railway fatalities:
    https://www.transportworldafrica.co.za/2017/11/21/railway-fatalities-on-the-rise/

    The number of deaths resulting from railway operational occurrences have increased by 8% in the 2016/17 reporting period, says the Railway Safety Regulator (RSR).

    The regulator held a media briefing on Monday in Johannesburg. The research general manager at the RSR, Dr Cornel Manal, said about 495 fatalities have been recorded, which shows an increase of 8% compared to the 2015/16 reporting period.

  27. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Bingo, I hit a nerve of a hasbarist.

    “Small fraction”? LOL
    As if Jews do not do “what’s good for Jews”.

    Jews want everyone else to think they are so few & helpless victims when in fact they create massive resentment towards themselves by their owns actions.

    “Obscure” my ass:

    – The US Census is prohibited from counting ‘Jews’ and all US federal, state and local governments are similarly disallowed from ‘noticing’ Jewish formation and over representation.

    [MORE]

    According to Jewish law Jews are to avoid being counted.
    “To actually count Jews directly is forbidden (Talmud, Yoma 22b), as the prophet says: “And the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which shall neither be measured nor counted.”
    http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/896203/jewish/Laws-of-Counting-Jews.htmand

    ‘Why is it forbidden to count Jews?’
    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/18472

    “This opening verse of our Biblical portion teaches that it is forbidden to take a number count of the Israelites, a census activity which Jewish organizations are constantly involved in doing. This prohibition is reinforced by the prophet Hosea (chapter 2), when he declares: “The number of the children of Israel shall be as the sands of the sea, which cannot be numbered and cannot be counted…” And historically even King David learned the bitter lesson of the power of this command, when- against the will of his Chief Commander Joab – he ordered a census, and the Israelites suffered a plague (II Samuel, 24).”

    – “This prohibition is reinforced by the prophet Hosea (chapter 2), when he declares: “The number of the children of Israel shall be as the sands of the sea, which cannot be numbered and cannot be counted…”

    – “I have seen all the (Jewish?) works that are done under the sun; and, behold, all is vanity and a striving after wind. That which is crooked cannot be made straight, and that which is wanting cannot be numbered….” Book of Ecclesiaste

  28. wayfarer says:

    South Africa: Failed State 2.0

    South Africa: Failed State Incoming

    South Africa 2019: Beginning of the End

  29. Wally says:
    @Michael Kenny

    Please present proof that US colonists “exterminated the native peoples” (actually migrated Asians*) and “introduced African slaves” (actually it’s black Africans who initially sold their slaves to largely Jew slave dealers*).
    Sure are a lot of brown ‘Indians’ running around that were not “exterminated”.

    * Stone-age Europeans were the first to set foot on North America, beating American Indians by some 10,000 years, new archaeological evidence : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9110838/Stone-age-Europeans-were-the-first-to-set-foot-on-North-America.html

    * African chiefs urged to apologise for slave trade, Nigerian civil rights group says tribal leaders’ ancestors sold people to slavers and should say sorry: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/18/africans-apologise-slave-trade
    “African chiefs were the ones waging war on each other and capturing their own people and selling them. If anyone should apologise it should be the African chiefs. We still have those traitors here even today.”

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  30. republic says:

    talk at the EU by Simon Roche of Suidlanders, the South African Survivalist group

  31. @Michael Kenny

    Before the 1990s the cities in South Africa were mostly white.

    I’ve visited South Africa several times in the early 2000 and by car traveled to, Botswana, Zim, Zam, Mozambique, Namibia, Tanzania and Malawi.

    Every white person I met, had a loved one, or friend that had been murdered.

    The whites that I met, lived extraordinary lives and managed the risks, but despite the horrors, loved their country deeply. The Afrikaners, were hard working and decent people and a truly masculine culture.

    The masses and the different tribes – some aggressive, some passive and some were very proud – was a mind altering experience. It changed my entire perspective on brotherly love. These humans were functioning on a primal level and you do not want them in your neighborhood. Even rabbits do not breed this fast.

    Another standout that I observed, was that this entire geographical area, was corporate, color blind and deadly to human existence and this dystopia is coming to a community near you.

  32. republic says:

    The late white nationalist leader,Dr. William L. Pierce wrote this article in 1998
    about the selling out of the whites by the elites in South Africa

    https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/12/the-lesson-of-south-africa/

    The lessons of South Africa

    • Replies: @Heros
  33. republic says:
    @Michael Kenny

    The White population in the early 20th century was about 22%.

    In the South African Republic, an independent country in the late 19th century, the percentage of whites was much,much higher.

  34. @Christians aka God's true chosen people

    Your sermon makes no sense unless you reserve the opprobrium for the Ruperts exclusively, for the nemesis is well-known but the enemy within lurks behind the walls, out in the open. The White Christian race can’t save itself until it can deal with its own demons decisively!

  35. Heros says:
    @republic

    Interesting article and very true.

    “For at least 11 years before 1993 the Church had been back-pedaling on its racial doctrine. The Church would have made the Boers feel guilty if they had taken the hard measures against the Blacks that were called for to ensure the future of their own people. It was easy for the Blacks to contemplate massacring the Whites — the African National Congress had the slogan “one settler, one bullet” — but the Whites could no longer contemplate massacring the Blacks without feeling guilty.

    The US is rapidly following South Africa down the turd bowl, and Europe swirling not far behind.

    • Replies: @Rogue
  36. @Wally

    But I do have to solicit admission from you. It was still more humain deed from them than cook the captives and eat them. Presentation of this fact in movies was more humorous but in reality it was reality.

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  37. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Sometimes when I do see what the blacks are doing in States today I do feel to curse the chieftains for abandoning their age long practice.

  38. Rogue says:
    @Michael Kenny

    The Whites were never more than a tiny minority

    Nonsense. Approximately one hundred years ago the Black SA population outnumbered the White SA population by about 50%.

    Due to generous White funding by the “evil apartheid regime” Black infant mortality plummeted, and Black life expectancy soared over the subsequent decades – substantially better than anywhere else in Sub-Saharan Africa.

    Whites, like everywhere else in the world, stopped having children.

    • Agree: Mr McKenna
  39. Rogue says:
    @Tom Welsh

    Whilst the Native Americans suffered undeniable injustice (as do all subjugated peoples), if they disappeared altogether America would be no worse or better of.

    If South Africa’s Whites – and to a lesser extent it’s Asian population – leave or get thrown out, the country will collapse.

    Apparently, if you are White and think what I’ve just written above – then you are a racist.

    Well, by that definition then I’m a racist.

    FWIW, I consider racism wrong – but denying race-realism is, at best, simply being naive.

    • Replies: @Whitewolf
  40. Rogue says:
    @Anonymous

    I live in Cape Town, so things are a little different.

    Where I currently stay I would be a little leery about walking around at night, but wouldn’t necessarily say it was too dangerous to do so. However, the neighborhood I used to stay in a year and a half ago (not very far from where I currently live) was pretty safe to take strolls in at one in the morning. I often did.

    Cape Town (and the whole Western Cape province) is governed by the DA party referenced in the above article. It’s still mostly a White party and – surprise, surprise – maintains infrastructure and other stuff in a mostly first-world manner. All eight other provinces are run by the (overwhelmingly Black) ANC – and it shows.

  41. Rogue says:
    @Heros

    I agree, he’s an interesting individual.

    I don’t agree with everything he says, but unquestionably he is a very brave man.

    Also, as you say, they try to brand him a supporter of Apartheid – which is a bald-faced lie – when his main mission field in the last few years has been South Sudan.

    Apparently, by not joining in the Mandela worship cult, he’s been deemed to be a racist!

    The world we live in …

  42. Rogue says:
    @Heros

    the African National Congress had the slogan “one settler, one bullet”

    No, that is not true.

    That quote comes from the fringe group called the Pan Africanist Congress.

    They have largely become irrelevant in modern day SA.

    Their radical ideas live on, however. To what extent their views are held by the Black population is difficult to say. But, worryingly, almost certainly more so by the “youth” (a somewhat elastic term in SA) than by the older generations.

  43. Antonius says:
    @Wally

    Ernest Oppenheimer was a convert to Anglicanism. And if you’re going down that path check out Alfred Beit et al and Thomas Pakenham’s excellent “The Boer War”.

  44. Whitewolf says:
    @Rogue

    You consider racism wrong? You’re part of the problem. The current troubles in South Africa and Zimbabwe are the direct result of thinking racism is wrong.

    Racism is thought to mean treating other people badly because of the color of their skin. The reality though is that the word is used by anti-Whites to describe any act or thought of racial solidarity by Whites whatsoever. Therefore if Whites think or say racism is wrong they think any act or thought of racial solidarity by Whites is wrong subconsciously.

    When trying to decide if “racism” or “anti-semitism” or other mind control words are wrong, look first at their actual usage. The difference between what you think a word or phrase means and how it’s employed by anti-Whites is usually very substantial. As an example the word violent. Most people don’t like “violent” people. What happens though if one group of people are called violent just for defending themselves against another group violently attacking them? Imagine this other group doing the attacking never being called violent. That’s where we are today.

    • Replies: @Rogue
    , @anarchyst
  45. @Tom Welsh

    She is wearing 2 fragile wristbands. Maybe you just have bad eyes but imagine what a psychologist could interpret into your statement.

  46. Anonymous[425] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tom Welsh

    1.26 Per mille, 1.26 in 1000 not in 100

    • Replies: @Tom Welsh
  47. @Anonymous

    Light infantry can defeat mechanized forces with artillery and air support. Look at the Lebanon War of 2006. And the Israeli military, despite not being nearly as strong as itself and the anglo jew worshipers like to portray it, is much better than the South African.
    Then there is Chechnya were the Russians needed massive numerical superiority and bribes to take control of the country.
    Also possibly it wont be a conflict of Whites versus everyone else but of Blacks vs everyone else as most Asians and Coloureds seem to be discontent with ANC rule too. Furthermore it isn’t unlikely that there will be a lot of infighting along tribal, party, gang lines on the black side. Meaning the numbers won’t be as uneven after all.

    Given the great breakdown in South Africa will actually happen. According to many of it’s prophets it has been 3 to 5 years away since at least 15 years.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  48. South Africa today has been a planned event from the beginning. Yes they’re kicking whites from their land and handing it over to blacks. But, what happens to the mortgage? I hear the evicted white farmers are still responsible for it, and if they don’t pay or can’t, well there’s always the property itself. So I see this as a huge land grab with the ultimate winner as usual will be the white owned Banks and their respective Tribe. I mean it’s Africa, a tribal continent. Right? We hear about farmers and think crops and livestock, we don’t think about the minerals under the ground. All these farms, tens of thousands of acres have old school mortgages that don’t restrict the owner’s rights to top soil only. So how do they, the banks, get at the mineral wealth, the gas, gold, oil, they perform a sort of white only exorcism, and cleanse the land. The poor uneducated blacks who take over these farms will never know what hit them. It’s a Tribal thing, and the Tribe I’m talking about ain’t black.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  49. Rogue says:
    @Whitewolf

    I stated quite clearly that I’m a race-realist.

    I’m not a “racist” (granted, a ridiculously stretchy-term) and consider racism a moral wrong. That is to say, I’m utterly against having contempt or hatred for a different ethnic group simply for who they are.

    The current problems in SA and what was Rhodesia have bugger-all to do with thinking racism was wrong.

    Rhodesia folded because the White SA government threw them under the bus. Yes! Fact!

    White SA folded for other reas0ns – not least due to treasonous elites, international sanctions by the West, the recalling of foreign loans by Western financial institutions (the real back-breaker) and the collapse of Marxism in Eastern Europe.

    Some like to believe (to sooth their very fragile inferiority-complexes) that the Black “liberation” groups within – and the Cuban forces without – caused this fundamental shift on the part of the White SA government .

    Laughable.

    However, De Klerk and his lickspittle minions hardly come up smelling of roses on this issue.

  50. i suppose the writer believe that the sanctions and other bs the US have pestered Venezuela with the last 15+ yrs play no part in its downward spiral? It is only socialism`s fault. Apart from that it was a interesting article tho.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  51. Joe Wong says:
    @Walter Duranty

    The article reminds me how the American fabricated a negative image about China during the Cold War, actually the fabrication about China is on going and it was started from Opium War. Bad mouthing others seems a trait of the ‘God-fearing’ morally defunct evil ‘xtians’.

    • Replies: @Wally
  52. @Rogue

    “”I’m not a “racist” (granted, a ridiculously stretchy-term) and consider racism a moral wrong.”

    Racism is an invented word conjured up by people looking to silence debate and vilify certain groups (whites) . That is why the word will induce the broadest scope of defining as you suggest. For a majority of those stretchy definitions there is already a previously existing word. For example:

    “That is to say, I’m utterly against having contempt or hatred for a different ethnic group simply for who they are.”

    The word for that is “bigotry.”

    If I had to apply a definition to the term “racism,” I would say that it’s basically: looking out for the interests of one’s own racial group first (notice this only a bad thing when whites engage in the process.) But admittedly that definition can be applied to the word tribalism. Either way I find no moral objection to it, despite what we’ve been made to believe.

    • Replies: @Rogue
  53. TG says:

    Interesting. Yes, it bears repeating that what’s really going on in South Africa is that the white elite threw their fellow whites under the bus – and their black fellow citizens as well.

    Consider. In 1960 South Africa was broadly prosperous, with a low fertility rate (despite what you may have heard, countries with no frontier and sustained high fertility rates are never rich), and a white population that was about 25% of the total.

    But the elites didn’t care for this. Because nothing, but nothing, makes the rich richer than cheap labor. So the white elites imported massive numbers of black refugees from poorer African nations to drive wages down and profits up. This created poverty amongst the working class blacks, and reduced the fraction of the South African population that was white.

    Now the black elites – probably under the guidance of the old white elites – are continuing their policy of flooding the labor market with cheap foreign labor. South African blacks protesting this policy are predictably maligned as ‘racist’ or ‘xenophobic.’

    So with all these angry young unemployed black men, the black elites need a scapegoat to draw attention away from their abusive immigration policies. So they target white farmers and the white working class – but of course, the real white elite is untouched.

    Suppose the South Africans circa 1960 had been left alone. A South Africa that is 25% white might be harder to marginalize whites than one that is 6% white. A South Africa that was broadly prosperous, might be one where perhaps the blacks and whites could have come to some accommodation. Perhaps not. We only know that the South Africans were not allowed to try, because the rich love cheap labor more than anything else.

    It’s easy to see South Africa through the lens of race, and surely race is important, but it’s really all about class war. Follow the money.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  54. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @Per/Norway

    Thanks. My question (#21) about that has so far been ignored.

  55. anarchyst says:
    @Whitewolf

    “Racism” is a made-up word that was introduced by the inventors of communism . . . in order to destabilize non-communist cultures and make them ripe for takeover.
    True “racism” is desirable as it promotes the advancement of the culture and forges a “common bond” between the members of the race. True “racism” merely denotes commonality of purpose among like-minded individuals with a common culture.
    Every race is expected to promote and advance its own culture; hence, the NAACP and “congressional black caucus” for blacks, the ADL and $PLC for jews and la raza and mecha for hispanics.
    It is the unique sense of white altruism that has made so-called “civil-rights (for some)” laws possible. “Affirmative action”, contract set-asides and preferences, other government “programs” for minorities only unrestricted immigration from third-world countries while white immigrants “need not apply”. . .and other unequal treatment has resulted in more-qualified whites being denied opportunities that would rightly be theirs. This is white altruism in action. . . NO OTHER RACE has EVER given people of other races a “break” . . . It has never happened in the history of humanity, save our own. . . white altruism will spell the demise (and destruction) of the white race. . .
    It is only whites that are expected to shed all vestiges of racial cohesiveness.
    Guess which race maintains the most racial and cultural insularity and cohesiveness yet decries racial cohesiveness by whites??
    I will leave it to the gentle readers to figure it out . . .
    I am PROUD to be considered “racist” and thank my accusers enthusiastically and “thank them for noticing”. The confused, bewildered looks on their faces is priceless…

  56. Asagirian says: • Website

    The example of South Africa proves that those who favor ideology-over-identity will lose to those who favor identity-over-ideology. Those who choose blood over ink will prevail over those who choose ink over blood. Now, everyone has some identity and some ideology. The question is a matter of which goes on top. Among whites, it used to be identity first, ideology second. Now, it is ideology first, identity second. Or it’s idolatry first, ideology second, and identity last? Idolatry of worshiping the Holy Three of Jews, Homos, and Negroes. The ideology of DIOS or ‘diversity is our strength’ and ‘white guilt’. And last and also the least, white identity. In contrast, Jews and blacks put identity before ideology. Also, they celebrate the idolatry of worshiping themselves over the Other. Jews elevate and disseminate the image of Jews as Holy Holocaust People and Happy Humor People. Negroes elevate and lionize themselves as the superior badass people who win in sports, pop music, fighting, and sex. Blood is stronger than ink, seed is stronger than creed.

    Indeed, we can see the results of identity-over-ideology vs ideology-over-identity in recent US history(as well as in South Africa or any other part of the world). Two highly intelligent and talented groups have been Ashkenazi Jews and Anglo-Episcopalians. Studies show that both groups have equal intelligence, generally one standard deviation above the American average. Some estimates even suggest Anglo-Episcopalians may have slightly higher IQ than the Ashkenazi Jews. So, given parity in intelligence and talent, the two groups should have been neck-and-neck. Or the Anglo-Episcopalians should have had the advantage since they are Christian and share race and religion with the white majority population, among whom Anglo or Northern European stock has been prominent. But since the end of World War II, Jews kept gaining while Anglo-Episcopalians kept losing ground. Now, one reason could be personality. Maybe Jews have more a dogged, aggressive, and insistent personalities, the chutzpah thing. Or, maybe Jews were more adept at navigating through modernity due to greater(and more shameless) familiarity with strangeness, and indeed, the 20th century was a very strange era with so many upheavals and transformations. Due to their long history as a nomadic people who developed Zelig-ish and Houdini-like means to adapt to different nations and cultures, all the while maintaining a strong and resilient sense of tribal continuity and identity, Jews were perhaps more ‘creative’ in the way they played the game of modernity. After all, if there are two boxers of equal speed and ability but one is rather stiff while other is fluid, the latter will have the advantage. Shamelessness was part of the fluidity that allowed Jews to take control of vice industries that, though disreputable(at least initially), made Jews a lot of money in stuff like gambling and pornography. Also, this strange fluidity served Jewish Identity well because hostile identity had to be camouflaged with hopeful ideology. Jews couldn’t have won over goyim if they’d insisted on their identity alone. Imagine if Jews said, “We are so proud to be Jewish and want you goyim to do the bidding of us Jews.” Even the biggest Philo-Semites would have been offended by such presumption and arrogance. So, Jews cleverly sought power by spouting ideological talking points about ‘justice’, ‘equality’, ‘progress’, ‘universal values’, ‘human rights’, ‘proposition nation’, ‘fighting hate’, ‘diversity’, ‘tolerance’, and etc. By pushing such ideological themes, Jews created the impression that human progress depends on peoples all over the world suppressing their particular identities to welcome the one-and-only universal ideology. After all, identity is rooted and tangible whereas ideology is rootless and abstract. You can’t immediately transform someone to another national identity(nor would you want to, that is if you want to maintain the integrity of identity), but you can quickly convert anyone to your beliefs and values.
    Now, if Jewish Power led the charge with identity, goyim would have countered with their own identities. If Jews say, “We are Jewish, we are proud, and we work for Jewish power!”, then goyim such as Poles would have countered with “We are Polish, we are Catholic, we are proud, and we work for Polish power!” Therefore, Jews decided to charge with ideology than identity. Jews said, “We are for justice and progress based on ‘western values’ and universal human rights, and if you oppose us, you’re a bunch of ‘racists’, ‘supremacists’, ‘xenophobes’, and probably ‘anti-Semites’ too.” This had a disarming effect on the goyim. After all, if Jews claim such noble neo-Christo-visions of bringing all of humanity under one umbrella of justice, tolerance, and understanding, why should any people say NO?
    In truth, however, Jews weren’t charging with ideology to serve ideology above all else. They were charging with ideology to smash goy identity so that Jewish identity could squeeze through the barriers and score the touchdown to win the game. In football, the offensive linemen do not smash into defensive linemen to score touchdowns. The offensive linemen rarely get to handle the ball. Their only role is to defend the quarterback and/or open up holes for the running back to slip through. And this is the game that Jews have been playing. They used the force of ideology as offensive linemen so that the ball of Jewish identity handled by the quarterback/runningback would slip through and score the touchdown. So, in the end, the elite competition in the US after WWII was not about Jewish commitment to ideology vs Anglo-Episcopalian commitment to ideology. It was Jewish commitment to ideology masked with ideology vs Anglo-Episcopalian commitment to ideology over identity. Well, guess who won that game? Increasingly, Anglo-elites lost their sense of identity. They even came to regard it as evil and wicked. This spread not only among Anglo-elites in the US but spread to the UK where the elites now celebrate the fact that UK will be overrun with Africans and Muslims. (To be sure, white elites seek to preserve their own status and privilege, so they don’t really practice the ideology they preach. But unlike Jews, they are not using ideology as cover for identity. Rather, they use ideology to have immunity. Sticking with PC talking points buys them some protection from criticism.) Anglo-elites have chosen ideology(and immunity) over identity… without realizing that Jews pushed the toxic ideology that is now poisoning the West in order to favor Jewish identity above all else. Jews didn’t push ideology over all identities. They pushed ideology only against goy identities to make space for Jewish identity(that got passover rights). So, while Anglo-American elites in US and Anglo-British elites in UK have been pissing away their land, legacy, and lineage, Jewish elites the world over have been doing everything to reinforce and strengthen Israel as a Jewish State and to turn Holocaustianity as the reigning neo-religion all around the world.

    [MORE]

    Now, who knows how the world might turn out IF all groups sincerely and conscientiously committed themselves to ideology over identity. Whatever the result may be, at the very least one could say all groups acted in good faith. But reality is never one where all sides behave with utmost honesty and highest principles. After all, why does every nation have an intelligence agency that specializes in spying, stealing secrets, planting disinformation, subverting other nations though covert means, and etc? So much for mutual trust and fair play. Or look how corporations operate. Why do they get sued? Why do they have to pay fines? Because they are often caught cheating or doing stuff to gain an edge. It’s always been like that and always will be. If anything, most big corporations seek monopoly power so that they won’t have to deal with competition. It’s the nature of power. Then, it’s the same with tribes, peoples, and nations. The idea that all peoples will be equally committed to ideology-over-identity is a pipe-dream. Furthermore, even if MOST peoples do somehow manage to favor ideology-over-identity, it only takes ONE violator to mess up everything. Suppose there are 100 people, and 99 of them act fair and honest while ONE guy exploits the ‘naivete’ of others to steal the entire loot for himself. Just like one bad apple can spread its mold and mess up the whole barrel, one transgressor can mess up everything. This is why libertarianism never works. It assumes that all of humanity could be persuaded to behave as principled individuals who are sincerely committed to liberty and personal responsibility, but that is fairyland. Consider how all those guys on Wall Street were preaching about ‘free markets’ and against government regulation, but the minute their fortunes were threatened by the crash of 2008, they were the first to run to government for bailouts and protection. And notice how they used their muscle to ensure that none of them would go to jail. Talk about professional(and tribal) courtesy. Indeed, the reason why the US is so corrupt is because it came under the domination of Jews who rose in power by pushing ideology only to favor their own identity above all else. Indeed, Jews favor Jewish identity not only above goy identities but above the ideology that they pretend to espouse. What applies to other groups doesn’t apply to Jews. So, the US must sanction Iran, Russia, Syria, and any nation hated by Jews, but if any conscientious people want to sanction Israel for its Occupation of West Bank and brutality in Gaza, the hell with free speech, freedom of conscience, and universal justice: Criminalize BDS. Its Juden Uber Alles. Current Israel is more further right(often in dark ways) than any European nation, but notice the Jewish-dominated media never call it ‘far right’ while the label is used so often to denigrate even moderate nationalist movements in Europe. So, even the slightest sign of white/European identity or Christian consciousness(the real kind as opposed to globo-homo-infected cucktianity) is ‘far right'(implying connection to Nazism) while even the most hardline Zionist extremism and supremacism is merely described as ‘right-wing’.
    The main reason why Jews get so triggered about white goyim in EU, US, Russia, and etc. expressing the slightest concern for whites in South Africa is because such sentiments suggest at the stirrings of white identity, i.e., whites coming to realize that they must choose identity-over-ideology for the survival and well-being of their race. Jews want identity-over-ideology only for themselves. Indeed, Jewish-dominated media even try to suppress it among black Africans. While the globohomo media have no problem with Jews doing everything possible to keep Israel predominantly Jewish, they have lambasted black South Africans for trying to stem the tide of migration-invasion from neighboring African nations like Zimbabwe(with economy worse than South Africa’s due to total black rule or misrule). Jews fear that if whites favor identity-over-ideology, whites will come to favor their own identity over any other. And that means whites will put their own racial pride and racial interests above those of Jews. If that happens, Jewish Supremacism and globohomo hegemony could well end sooner than later. The utter hypocrisy of Jews is most evident in their reaction to white favoring of Jewish identity over goyim, white or otherwise. If Jews are indeed disdainful of identity(as tribal , dangerous, and obsolete), why are they so happy to see so many white people pledging their support to Jews and Israel? Isn’t Jewishness an identity and isn’t Israel an identitarian-state? For whites to favor Jews means favoring one identity over another. e.g. Zionists over Palestinians. If the politics of identity is so toxic and if Jews insist that whites must forsake their own racial identity, why do they also insist that whites must extol Jewish/Zionist identity and do everything in the world to serve and defend it? Why should whites favor Jews over Palestinians? Why should whites favor Israel over Syria or Iran? Why should whites favor economic sanctions on any people, nation, or group hated by Jews — consider the sanctions on Russia, Syria, Iran, Venezuela, Palestinians, Christians who won’t bend over to Homomania, white identitarians like Jared Taylor who are denied Twitter and Paypal, and etc. — while showering Israel with billions in ‘aid’ every year? Why should whites get all worked up over non-existent nukes in Iran while overlooking the nukes in Israel built with uranium stolen from the US? But then, Jewish logic would have us believe that actual Jewish communist spies and subversives in the 40s and 50s were innocent victims of the McCarthyite ‘witchhunt’ whereas Trump and his associates are guilty of ‘Russia Collusion’ even though there isn’t a shred of evidence and the ‘evidence’, as such exists, was fabricate by goons hired by the Hillary Campaign and the Deep State. Jews often deflect criticism by invoking the concept of Protected Groups. Because Jews have defined themselves as the Holy Holocaust people, they insist on Protected Status. Perversely, such protection has led to Jews becoming the New Nazis or Judeo-Nazis. It’s one thing to offer special protection to weak and helpless groups. After all, it makes sense to offer protection to few remaining tigers in their natural habitat. But if tigers were plentiful and prowling the streets to devour people, should they be protected? Maybe it made sense to offer protection to the badly wounded Jewish tiger after WWII, but today, the Jewish Tiger is the apex predator, and protected status for such power is dangerous for all of humanity. Just ask the Palestinians, Russians, Syrians, Iranians, white Christians, Libyans, white Europeans, Arabs, Muslims, etc. Or, consider the twisted logic when it comes to Jews and Muslims. Jews say Muslims need to be protected in the West due to ‘Islamophobia’, but it was Jewish Hollywood that made all those movies that portrayed Arabs and Muslims as subhuman scum terrorists. Furthermore, the biggest tragedies that befell the Muslim World since the End of the Cold War have been due to Wars for Israel steered by Jewish Neocons and Neolibs. So, Jewish Power has done tremendous harm to Arabs and Muslims. And yet, Jewish idea of Protected Status for Muslims and Arabs has NOTHING to do with what Jewish Power is doing to those people. Rather, it’s about protecting Muslims from Donald Trump and his supporters who, if anything, are more likely to oppose further Wars for Israel and want to bring US troops from the Middle East. The concept of Protected Groups has rendered justice meaningless when it comes to Jewish-and-Arab relations. If, as Jews insist, Jews and Arabs/Muslims both deserve special protection, what are we to do when Arabs/Muslims need protection from Jewish Power? After all, isn’t BDS a movement that calls for special protection for the much beleaguered Palestinians from Zionist-imperialist-supremacism? But, because Jews are also protected or more-protected-than-others, Jewish greed takes precedence over Palestinian needs. The end result is the Protected Supremacism of the Jews who, posing as Eternal Holy Holocaust People, get to justify all their nasty deeds by pretending to be a ‘victim group’ in this day and age. Imagine Nazi Germany invading Poland and then trying to silence all international opposition by claiming Protected Status for Germany. Nazi Germany and Judeo-Nazis both demonstrate how the Cult of Victimhood can blind so many to their victimization of Others. Because so many Germans felt that their nation got a raw deal at Versailles and suffered so much during the interwar period, they regarded themselves as righteous victims righting wrongs even though they were doing wrongs to other people. And because Jews rationalize everything through the prism of ‘Munich’ and destroying ‘new hitlers’, they are blind to how they’ve become the new hitlers.

    Identity-over-ideology will always beat ideology-over-identity. The recent history of Jews vs Anglo-Episcopalians bear this out. And it explains why Israel is proud and has healthy birthrates while Scandinavian nations are browbeaten and have low birthrates; it’s because Israeli Jews put identity over ideology whereas the Scandies put ideology over identity.
    Now, this doesn’t mean that a people should be all about identity and no ideology. “My country right or wrong” is a terrible idea. There must be a constant effort toward shared principles of fair play, justice, and mutuality among nations, peoples, and cultures, just like individuals mustn’t think in terms of ‘myself uber alles’. If you did something, you need to pay the price. Even so, to an individual, his own survival and well-being come first(as long as he doesn’t maliciously harm others). To a nation or people, their survival or well-being comes first. As long as a nation or people acknowledge the right of other nations and peoples to feel and act likewise, there should be no problem. The problem with Jewish Power is not universal nationalism, which is a sound idea. The problem is mono-nationalism whereby Jews and Only Jews get to enjoy the rights of nationalism while all other peoples must forsake their own nationalism mainly so that Jewish hegemonic power can systematically penetrate their nations and take control, especially with the aid of globo-homo ‘gay’ collaborators of every nation. (Homos around the world collaborate with Jewish Power because the spread of Jewish supremacism means homo-favoritism.) Even as Jews tell goyim to abandon their identity, Jews not only cling to theirs but practice what is essentially ‘my country right or wrong’. Jewish mono-nationalism isn’t a fair kind of nationalism but a gangster-nationalism where the politics of Jewish Identity is above the law and beyond reproach. Zionists occupying West Bank? Israel aiding terrorists in Syria? Wars for Israel turning millions of Arabs/Muslims into homeless nomads? Whatever happens, never blame Jews. Even though Israel is aggressor against Syria, the cuck-puppets in the media yammer about how ISRAEL needs to be protected from Syria. It’s all so surreal, so very strange and Kafkaesque, but then, Jews are masters of strangeness. Ironically, Jews have become like the Nazis who were into ‘my country right or wrong’ mentality. Now, if Nazi Germans and Globo-Zionists were without power, it wouldn’t matter what they think. But because Nazi Germany was a great power, its arrogance and supremacist lunacy brought the world to the brink. And now, Jewish globo-homo hegemonic power is doing much the same, spreading filth, hate, and lies all over. In some ways, Jewish globo-homo lunacy is more dangerous than Nazi lunacy because, at the very least, the Nazis were honest and forthright about their arrogance, contempt, and supremacism. Even those who admired certain aspects of National Socialism could see that it was led by real a**holes. Jewish supremacist are also monsters but notice how they pretend to be human-rightists, liberal-democracists, universal-valueists, diversitists, and etc. But boil down the Jewish stew to its essentials, and remaining salts in the pot taste like Kosher Supremacism.

    Now, there is a better kind of nationalism. A tempered and moderate one where a nation, people, and culture prioritize their survival, preservation, and well-being all the while rejecting the arrogant mentality of ‘my country right or wrong’. Thus, if that nation or people are known to have done something wrong, they fess up and make amends. It’s like if your son commits a crime, it is only right that he should pay a fine or do time in jail. But that doesn’t mean he’s not your son. After serving time, you still favor him and try to help him because he’s part of the family. It was this kind of nationalism that prevailed for a time after WWII. Germany and Japan were made to admit their wrongs and paid a heavy price. But they were allowed to survive and take care of their own interests. Their nationalism was okay as long as it respected the nationalisms of other peoples. Back then, the US and Europe were ruled by genuine nationalist leaders who felt a strong bond with their own folks, culture, and history.
    But ever since Jews gained supremacist power in the US(that controls so much of the world through money, hard power, and soft power), the ideological coding of the West has been altered so that its goy elites would not only favor ideology over identity but abort even the mere thought of white identity within the white womb. And yet, this ideology was bogus because it wasn’t molded out of good will and reciprocity but to dupe goyim into dropping their own identities so that Jewish identity could slip through the weakened cracks to make the touchdown and win the superbowl of Global Power. It’s like Jews want whites to surrender their guns so that Jewish-controlled institutions will monopolize all the firepower. At this point, trusting Jewish Power is like trusting a fox in a henhouse. Tails I win, heads you lose. Maybe, it needn’t have been this way IF Jews, as the new elites, favored ‘what is good for American people’ over ‘what is good for Jewish supremacism’? It need not have been a zero-sum game. But as the new elites, Jews never felt much fondness or connection with the non-Jewish majority and just focused on increasing diversity to make goyim-fight-goyim while they grab more of the loot.

    People need ideology because identity alone isn’t enough. But ideology must serve or revolve around identity. Just like Earth revolves around the Sun, ideology must revolve around identity. A people must be identocentric than ideocentric, just like true astronomy is Helio-centric than Geo-centric. Those who choose to be ideo-centrists will surely lose to those who choose to be idento-centrists(while feigning as ideo-centrists). That is the history of Ashkenazi Jews vs Anglo-Episcopalians since the end of World War II. So… which side won and why? Just do the political math.
    And in South Africa, why are things getting worse for white Afrikaners while it’s looking so up and up for Jewish super-capitalists? Jews all over the world, in the spirit of identitarianism, stick up for Monopoly-Capitalist Jews in South Africa. In contrast, whites all over the world have been made to feel that it’s ‘racist’ and ‘white supremacist’ to care about white women being raped and white children being beaten to a pulp by blacks in South Africa.

  57. Not ‘black man’s wishes’ when we went in field trips or to PLC when I was in primary school. W was like the Groundskeeper, we’d grab each others’ hand when we spotted the BMW and said: ‘ ewwwww, you touched a black man’s groundskeeper!!!’

    Schools would be too PC for that now. Some diversitsrd teacher too dumb to understand the curriculum would haul the poor kid before a teacher. Then a lardarsed, frizzy-haired ratfaced yenta would send it on a diversitard tax-payer funded field trip to ‘ ‘Aushwitz’ to learn about da Holohoax TM!!!

  58. peterAUS says:

    Frans Cronje, the organization’s CEO, has mapped out several future scenarios, but he thinks the most likely is one where the nation breaks up into semi-autonomous enclaves divided along racial, class and ethnic lines.

    Dan Roodt dismissed the possibility that a breakaway effort would be suppressed, arguing that the South African military has become dysfunctional and inept under ANC leadership. “We have always been outnumbered. I don’t think that’s the problem,” he said. “Only other whites could endanger us.”

    “There would have been some sort of revolt a long time ago already if it weren’t for the fact that people here are really scared of the USA and the European Union – and military action from them on the side of the ANC,” he said. “The more Europe and North America gets embroiled in their own multicultural problems, the more space it will open up for us here.”

    Pretty much.
    My bold, in particular.

    Having said that, there is ONE element, well known re Afrikaners, missing from the article and all the comments so far.
    Unless that element is properly addressed, even “dysfunctional and inept” military can suppress white breakaway effort, with ease.
    Anyway…..

  59. mr meener says:
    @Christians aka God's true chosen people

    how come the jew Ilana mercer didn’t write this article being her Bolshevik jew father played a big part along with joe slovo the head Bolshevik putting the senile simpleton in power while creating the communist ANC. then as the country was going down they fled south afreaka and now she poses as a right winger

  60. KenH says:

    Now that the midterms are over Trump doesn’t have to pretend to care about SA whites. Besides, they aren’t Jews and only Jews matter to him. And Tucker’s probably been warned not to broach the plight of SA whites anymore so they’ll be left to fend for themselves.

    SA has an Asian Indian population and I wonder how they are faring and if India provides them assistance. Are they victims of violent crime and living in tent cities as an increasing number of poor whites are?

    • Replies: @Druid
  61. peterAUS says:
    @TG

    ….white elite threw their fellow whites under the bus…

    ….Because nothing, but nothing, makes the rich richer than cheap labor. So the white elites imported massive numbers of black refugees from poorer African nations to drive wages down and profits up. …

    ….with all these angry young unemployed black men, the black elites need a scapegoat to draw attention away from their abusive immigration policies. So they target white farmers and the white working class – but of course, the real white elite is untouched.

    ….it’s really all about class war.

    You could be onto something here.
    And, looks familiar re processes we’ve seen in Western world overall.

    Fear not. One day in distant future, when people on “alt-right” accept there is that thing called “class war” among whites, things will start getting better. Actually, “if”, not “when”.”If” with rather low probability, that is.

    As for:

    Follow the money.

    You appear not on the program. It’s all about bad Joos, you know. Never about rich bastards among whites.
    Funny, a?

  62. For 40 years, or was it longer, I can’t remember, I did all I could to give people houses, hospitals, schools, and when they were hungry, I gave them food. I even made Benghazi into farmland from the desert. I stood up to attacks from that cowboy Reagan. When he killed my adopted orphaned daughter, he was trying to kill me; instead he killed that poor innocent child.

    I helped my brothers and sisters from Africa with money for the African Union; I did all I could to help people understand the concept of real democracy, where people’s committees ran our country. But that was never enough, as some told me, even people who had 10-room homes, new suits and furniture, were never satisfied. As selfish as they were they wanted more, and they told Americans and other visitors they needed “democracy” and “freedom,” never realizing it was a cut-throat system, where the biggest dog eats the rest.

    But they were enchanted with those words, never realizing that in America, there was no free medicine, no free hospitals, no free housing, no free education and no free food, except when people had to beg or go to long lines to get soup.

    No, no matter what I did, it was never enough for some, but for others, they knew I was the son of Gamal Abdel Nasser, the only true Arab and Muslim leader we’ve had since Salah’a’Deen, when he claimed the Suez Canal for his people, as I claimed Libya, for my people. It was his footsteps I tried to follow, to keep my people free from colonial domination — from thieves who would steal from us…

    Now, I am under attack by the biggest force in military history. My little African son, Obama, wants to kill me, to take away the freedom of our country, to take away our free housing, our free medicine, our free education, our free food, and replace it with American style thievery, called “capitalism.”

    But all of us in the Third World know what that means, it means corporations run the countries, run the world, and the people suffer. So, there is no alternative for me, I must make my stand, and if Allah wishes, I shall die by following his path, the path that has made our country rich with farmland, with food and health, and even allowed us to help our African and Arab brothers and sisters to work here with us, in the Libyan Jammohouriyah.

    I do not wish to die, but if it comes to that, to save this land, my people, all the thousands who are all my children, then so be it.

    Let this testament be my voice to the world, that I stood up to crusader attacks of NATO, stood up to cruelty, stood up to betrayal, stood up to the West and its colonialist ambitions, and that I stood with my African brothers, my true Arab and Muslim brothers, as a beacon of light. When others were building castles, I lived in a modest house, and in a tent. I never forgot my youth in Sirte, I did not spend our national treasury foolishly, and like Salah’a’deen, our great Muslim leader, who rescued Jerusalem for Islam, I took little for myself.

    In the West, some have called me “mad,” “crazy,” but they know the truth and continue to lie. They know that our land is independent and free, not in the colonial grip, that my vision, my path, is, and has been clear and for my people and that I will fight to my last breath to keep us free. May Allah almighty help us to remain faithful and free.

    -Muammar Gaddafi, April 17, 2011

    I don’t know, they look pretty united protesting Israel.

    Whats the media in S Africa like? If anything like ours, they’re probably to blame for most of the division, violence and hatred.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  63. Lets hear it for the African girl with bigger balls and more integrity than all of our fellow Caucasians in congress and Mr. Trump.

    Actually had the guts to call out The Lobby, good to see. Now if some Caucasians would follow suit instead of giving Satan himself, Bibi, 30 standing ovations like the traitors, cowards and LOSERS that they are. Sad!

    • Replies: @Wally
  64. Wally says:
    @redmudhooch

    Yet she caved and kissed Jew butt.

  65. Wally says:
    @Joe Wong

    Oh yawn.

    As if Chairman Mao wasn’t a “negative image” without American help. Nothing “fabricated” about it.

    The Chinese deserve their share of being “bad mouthed”.

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  66. Whitewolf says:
    @Rogue

    You might be a race realist but you aren’t very observant when it comes to the word “racist”. It is a mind control word with a fluid meaning. Anything any White person does, says or even thinks about that might be considered in even a slight way pro-White or just show solidarity with Whites is labelled “racist”. To declare you are not a racist means you haven’t really paid attention to the actual usage of the word much like most Whites. The only way you can be not “racist” if you are White is by supporting White Genocide. Like Noel Ignatiev said a long time ago “the idea of abolishing the White race is so desirable only a committed White supremacist would oppose it”.

    • Replies: @Rogue
  67. @redmudhooch

    Those who brought down Gaddafi so that now Libyans can hunt blacks and kill them for sport or drag them to the slave market are the same ones who brought down apartheid in South Africa expecting Mandela to become SA’s Gaddafi and raise the blacks to then Libyan standards. Sometimes it gets hard to follow what they’re up to. I’m sure it’s somewhere in their Protocols but still … I suppose it makes sense to them.

  68. Joe Wong says:
    @Wally

    Without the ‘god-fearing’ morally defunct evil Anglo, Jap and the white man opium pushers, war mongers and death merchants, there won’t be any Mao in China, hundreds of millions death, endless wars and destruction around the world, ever enduring cult like hatred and belittling between human beings, trade wars, and crazies like Donald Trump, Dick Cheney, John Bolton, Peter Navarro, Tony Blair, etc. screwing up the peace, commerce, prosperity, and harmony of the world.

    • Replies: @Heros
  69. L Woods says:
    @Colin Wright

    The last place on Earth you can expect any succor is from white male military men — they’re on the whole conformist lapdogs through and through.

  70. ‘The last place on Earth you can expect any succor is from white male military men — they’re on the whole conformist lapdogs through and through.’

    Still. Clearing white homesteads after black child rapists have gone through them might be a bit too much even so.

    …then there would be the impact of the stories leaking back to all the deplorables back home.

    It could all work out for the best.

    …except for the South African whites themselves, of course. But then, I never understood how they could be so foolish as to cede power.

    • Replies: @Rogue
    , @Joe Wong
  71. Rogue says:
    @MikeatMikedotMike

    Sure, I know that the word “racist” was popularized by Leon Trotsky, from what I can gather. Specifically to sow racial discord.

    Also, that many Blacks and Browns the world over – or at least those in White or formerly White countries – deny that they can be racist. Only Whitey apparently.

    I’m not unaware of the humbug in all of this.

  72. Rogue says:
    @Whitewolf

    I agree with much of what you say.

    See my reply to MikeatMikedotMike.

    Anyway, I use the term “racist” in inverted commas because I’m aware it’s a quite dishonest description of racial animosity between different ethnic groups. That is, it’s clearly more directed at Whites than any other ethnic group. Or, as you say, it’s only directed at Whitey. Certainly, most of the time.

    However, I have had several genuine Black and Brown friends when I lived and worked in the UK, and at least one many years ago in SA. Not to mention a good number of friendly “POC” acquaintances in both the UK and SA.

    Some of the viciousness of so-called “White Nationalists” – regarding non-Whites in general – is not to my liking.

  73. Rogue says:
    @Colin Wright

    You are right. We were foolish to cede power.

    But we had all kinds of pressure endlessly directed against us. Economic sanctions by the West and the recalling of foreign loans in the 80’s turned the economic screws big time. Furthermore, there was always the threat dangling in the air that an oil embargo would be applied against SA. Clearly, we would have been screwed at that point.

    Add to that, cultural and sports boycotts, and being portrayed as the skunk of the world.

    We didn’t have an Israeli-style lobby in the USA.

    Indeed, we had close ties to Israel for several decades – until Israel decided we were surplus to requirements and dropped White SA like a ton of bricks in the late 80’s.

    On top of which, there was the possible threat, however remote, that Western military forces would eventually force the issue.

    Because communism so spectacularly collapsed in Eastern Europe in 1989, the White SA government felt they could proceed with a multiracial political dispensation with the quite avowedly Black Marxist “liberation” groups in SA.

    Informal talks had been going on for some years already between the White government and the Black liberation groups at the time of the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe (though the SA public knew nothing of this at the time).

    In other words, the SA government thought that Marxism had been mortally discredited as an economic and governmental model. With hindsight, we know they were wrong.

    However, I give no pass to our wondrous “leaders” of the time. Ultimately, I think they were bumbling clods – men of straw – and possibly even traitors, although the status quo was also no longer possible.

    My solution would have been complete separation into different states.

    Most likely just a pipe-dream now.

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  74. Heros says:
    @Joe Wong

    Joe, it looks like the jews have convinced the Chinese like you to blame whites for their opium trade monopoly the same way they have the blacks blaming whites for the jews slave trade monopoly. It was the Sassoons with their Rothschild sponsors who owned the China opium monopoly and started the Opium wars for their own benefit. This is a case of jews using whites as bullets against the Chinese, just as they used the Chinese as bullets against Tibet and Korea.

    The fact is that China got jewed by Mao. Mao was from the part of China where jews had settled centuries before and was likely a crypto.

    Whether he was crypto or not, Mao has also been closely linked to Yale and to the Skull and Bones (322) of Kerry,Bush and so many more. There is no doubt that the entire revolution in 1949 was just another commie-jew putsch, and Mao was their stooge just like Lenin, Kuhn and all the others.

    http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2011/06/jews-in-china.html

    http://www.darknessisfalling.com/darknessisfallingblogblog/mao-zedong-yale-in-china-skull-bones-and-the-jesuits

    http://mygen.com/users/ufo/Mao_was_a_Yale_Man.html

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  75. Tom Welsh says:
    @Anonymous

    Thanks for setting me right. I was trying to make a point, and overlooked that I was understating the case.

  76. @Walter Duranty

    The PATHETIC result of the WHITE man’s Supremacist Bigoted transgressions on Indigenous lands around the World.

    They marched into the lands with guns blazing, in effect, to steal land and resources and murder any African who stands in their way and then to “consummate” the “ownership” use so-called “agreements” such as but not limit4d to DEEDS, based on THEIR RULES, called Statutory Laws, to claim OWNERSHIP of lands and resources which actually belonged to the Indigenous, by virtue of the Natural LAW of THEIR thousands of years of Occupation, by their own, RIGHTFUL, standards

    To hopefully maintain this farce the WHITES made certain to keep the REAL AFRICANS POOR and IGNORANT, of European Statutory laws.

    Now they are wondering what went wrong

    Their ( and American) Supremacist, Bigoted ARROGANCE will always prevent them from understanding that WHITE Supremacy is slowly dying and will continue,including that of WHITE Jews (Ashkenazi). The Jews will take a little longer, but they too will lose.

    I will celebrate when I see Rothschild go down. I hope to live long enough

    This is a painful, but well–deserved, time for Whites and will continue for quite a while and YES I am white-White Irish. The British did to us what the Boers did to South Africans. We eventually prevailed under British WHITE tyranny after over 600 years of THEIR Thefts and Murders, of our land and peoeple which was added to by Jewish White Supremacy under Cromwell, when he invited the Jews back to England in the 1600’s.

    Indigenous people are on the march to obtain and in some way, to revenge and recover, WHAT HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM THEM.

    The times,”they are a changing” !

  77. Joe Wong says:
    @Heros

    There are only so many Jews around the world, they cannot do all the harm as you wish to offload all the sins and crimes against humanity committed by the Whites onto them. The Whites are the initators, planners, and executioners of all those sins and crimes against humanity, but the Whites like the coward unrepentant war criminal Japanese do not have the courage to take up the responsiblity for their own deeds. Being said that, I did not say the Jews are innoncent.

  78. Joe Wong says:
    @onebornfree

    John Pilger`s documentary on Nelson Mandela “John Pilger Nelson Mandela and the ANC“ is also very revealing about the holy man Nelson Mendela.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=16&v=9dmjZ41yKXo

  79. Joe Wong says:
    @Colin Wright

    The white South African did not cede power willingly. Cuban supported by the Russian defeated the white South African in Angola and liberated the southern Africa from the white imperialists. The white South African could either fight on and ended like the Whites in Rhodesia, or they could cede power to a poppet black government and enjoyed apartheid in reality that is South Africa today.

    https://monthlyreview.org/2013/04/01/the-military-defeat-of-the-south-africans-in-angola/

    • Troll: L Woods
  80. Joe Wong says:
    @Rogue

    The white South African did not cede power, they were defeated.

    • Replies: @Rogue
  81. Rogue says:
    @Joe Wong

    Sheer nonsense.

    I read the Marxist screed that you linked to regarding Cuito Canavale.

    So many errors and half-truths it would be difficult to know where to begin.

    The Cubans can be credited with speeding up the process of Namibian independence, though even there the SA government had agreed to Namibian independence several years before – it was a question of timing.

    However, their claims of a great military victory over the SA army are just that: claims – and nothing else.

    Cuba had nothing to do with ending White minority rule in SA.

    Western sanctions, Western financial pressure in the form of the recalling of foreign loans made the economic situation untenable.

    Added to that, the sudden and unforseen collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe in 1989 made it possible for the avowedly anti-Marxist White government to feel that negotiations with the Black liberation groups within SA – which had been going on covertly for years – could try to reach a political settlement.

    That communism hasn’t been discredited, unfortunately, was something they didn’t anticipate.

    Fact: there was a Whites only referendum in the early 90’s about proceeding with negotiations with the Black “liberation” groups. (They’ve certainly liberated the public coffers since coming to power – but not much else). What fear existed in the minds of the White population about Cuba? None whatsoever. Easily 95% of the entire SA population knew nothing about Cuito Canavale – and that remains the case still today.

    Try reading some actual serious literature on the subject, and not a load of b/s by some Mickey Mouse Marxist “authority.”

    • Replies: @AlexT
  82. Druid says:
    @KenH

    Indians in SA have little to no contact with India and are routinely subject to violent and other crime, living in virtual prisons behind walls, burglar proofing, guards, etc. nobody talks about them, that’s all

  83. Sam J. says:

    I have read that the leadership of South Africa during the end of apartheid were involved in the same pedo scandals that our politicians are here and that is why they sold out the other Whites. The guy bringing this to light was of course murdered.

    It should also be noted there were next to no Africans in South Africa when Whites got there. To say the Bantu tribe that emigrated to South Africa after Whites built it up own the land is the same as saying the Mongols own France. The Blacks running things now moved there from the north.

  84. AlexT says:
    @Rogue

    Come to Europe, we would love to have you. Especially in Serbia, there we could really use your gifts as a people.

  85. @onebornfree

    Thank god someone has some sense in here. Mandela was a terrorist along with his buddies. My grandpops grew up in apartheid SA (indian) and he said it was not bad but I digress. Mandela was a terrorist and this should be parroted because everyone thinks he was some sort of saint.He was not. He even won the Peace Prize, he was like the Obama of the post lmao.

  86. Anonymous[359] • Disclaimer says:
    @Matthias Eckert

    Light infantry can defeat mechanized forces with artillery and air support. Look at the Lebanon War of 2006.

    Yes, they were trained and equipped to resist in a nation that supports them.

    I’ve bolded the important differences.

    For starters: “small arms infantry” is not “light infantry”.

  87. @anonymous

    You just caused in me the epiphany that the hallmark of all leftist whorenalism is the force-fit sentence.

    A lack thereof is what makes this article and most others that Unz carries so invigoratingly refreshing.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  88. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @Negrolphin Pool

    So why do you think the sentence I highlighted was included in this article?

  89. kula says:
    @gT

    The KhoiSan have had their wicked way. Despite all attempts to destroy the people and their culture, by black and white, they thrive and dominate. Those genes are strong and no amount of intermarriage has diluted them. All these words discussing black, white, pink and blue and the Khoisan just keep getting stronger. And nobody notices. The First People are real sneaky.

  90. anarchyst says:

    Apartheid was put in place to keep the normally warring tribes from decimating each other. As a result, South Africa became one of the most economically stable countries on the African continent. Despite the so-called “evils” of apartheid, there was a large influx of black immigrants into South Africa. Food was plentiful. Apartheid was able to “keep the peace” and was successful until communism’s “inventors”–(despite having arms agreements with South Africa) helped dismantle apartheid. The rest is history . . . South Africa is a “basket case”; its white farmers (producers) are being murdered. Farms that have been “appropriated” by blacks are being looted–not usable for farming anymore because anything of value is being sold for scrap. It is obvious that SA blacks have no propensity for farming…
    If one good thing comes of this, it will be the deserved “retribution” placed on the South African communists (jews) for being a major part in destroying this once-prosperous country. I would welcome the immigration of SA whites to the USA as they would be an asset to our country, but current American immigration laws do not allow for the immigration of whites to the USA, despite white genocide taking place.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution