The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 James Kirkpatrick Archive
Roll Over, Thucydides—“Failure Migration” Means the Weak Do What They Can, the Strong Suffer What They Must
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
VenezuelaRefugees

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The victory of Andrés Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO) in the recent Mexican presidential election likely means an increase in immigration to the United States. AMLO has called immigration a “human right that we will defend” and will probably continue the Mexican government’s meddling in American affairs. AMLO has also reportedly promised to demand “respect” from President Trump and the United States, which probably means less cooperation in stopping Central American migrants from moving through the country. [Mexican populist Lopez Obrador triumphs in presidential race, by Sabrina Rodriguez, Politico, July 1, 2018] If Mexico continues its decline into lawlessness or goes into recession, immigration from Mexico itself will sharply increase.

The ironic result of all this: the worse Mexico performs, the more powerful that nation becomes. Many nominal American citizens believe their first loyalty is with Mexico. Though they don’t want to live there, they don’t want to surrender their identity. [Not a country, not even a team, by Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, June 26, 2018] Exporting its underclass to the U.S. spares Mexico and other Latin American countries the need for internal reform. As Tucker Carlson recently put it: “America is now Mexico’s social safety net, and that’s a very good deal for the Mexican ruling class”. [Mexican presidential candidate calls mass migration to US a “human right,” by Dominic Mancini, Daily Caller, June 22, 2018]

Furthermore, Mexico and other Latin American countries continue to benefit from the endless flow of remittances from the U.S. America is literally paying welfare benefits to illegal aliens (if only for their anchor babies), some portion of which they then proceed to send home [Cutting welfare to illegal aliens would pay for Trump’s wall, by Paul Sperry, New York Post, March 10, 2018].

This phenomenon should be termed “Failure Migration.” The lower a people’s level of civilizational accomplishment, the more that people is able to expand its influence.

This paradox is another example of how the modern social and political system has a destructive and even dysgenic effect. Just as the welfare state is leading to dysgenic trends among the national population (satirized in the 2006 film Idiocracy) and global charitable efforts are leading to an unsustainable African population boom, so do progressive immigration policies and “asylum” claims allow dysfunction to spread.

One clear example: Central America. Recent days presented the unedifying spectacle of Vice President Mike Pence traveling to the region to beg its governments to stop exporting its people. “This exodus must end,” he whined to the leaders of Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador .[VP Pence tells Central America that the ‘exodus must end’ by Sonny Figueroa, Washington Post, June 29, 2018]

Yet why should these leaders listen to him? According to the World Bank, remittances constitute 11.2 percent of Guatemala’s GDP, 20.4 percent of El Salvador’s, and 18 percent of Honduras’s. Central American leaders would have to be as self-hating and suicidal as America’s to stop the migration.

Despite America’s far greater power, it is Pence who is begging Central America for help, not imposing conditions. It is as though Thucydides has been repudiated—the weak do what they can, and the strong suffer what they must (lest anti-American journalists call them racist).

The migration is especially remarkable because these “asylum seekers” are not fleeing a war so much as simply fleeing other Central Americans, including their propensity to organized crime and violence against women [Border Report: Why Central American Asylum-Seekers Keep Making Their Way to America’s Doorstep, by Maya Srikrishnan, Voice of San Diego, July 2, 2018]. If “fleeing violence” qualifies one for “asylum,” every Latin American in the world qualifies for entry into the United States. Needless to say, the only real result is the violence then spreads to the United States, which is why MS-13 is now merrily beating people to deathonly miles away from the American capital.

Nor is the Failure Migration problem merely confronting the U.S. Venezuela, whose experiment in socialism was gleefully praised by Michael Moore in America and Jeremy Corbyn in the United Kingdom, has now descended into an utter nightmare [Jeremy Corbyn’s silence on Venezuela speaks volumes, by Jason Mitchell, The Spectator, September 30, 2017]. The result: a massive outflow of Venezuelan refugees on the scale of those who fled the Syrian Civil War [Implosion of Venezuela creates refugees wave on scale of Syrian civil war, by Federico Puglie, Washington Times, April 12, 2018]. Countries such as Colombia, which have only recently recovered from their own internal chaos created by far-Left movements, are dealing with an increase in crime and instability caused by the unwanted influx of Venezuelans [The Crisis Next Door, by Anthony Faiola, Washington Post, March 2, 2018]. Needless to say, the United Nations is “supporting the relocation” of Venezuelans to neighboring countries like Brazil [UN Migration Agency Supports Latest Relocation of Venezuelans in Brazil, International Organization for Migration, May 4, 2018].

Yet this isn’t going unopposed by Brazilians; leading candidate for the presidency Jair Bolsonaro described the situation as “[T]he scum of the world is arriving in Brazil, as if we didn’t have enough problems to resolve” [Conservative’s star rises in Brazil as polarizing views tap into discontent, by Simon Romero, New York Times, May 7, 2016].

Many of these Venezuelans are probably just normal people escaping however they can. Yet Bolsonaro’s essential point is correct—it is impossible for any country to solve its longstanding problems if it is morally obligated to absorb the costs of every other country’s failures.

This is especially true when many of the failures of those nations are inherent to the people themselves. While policy choices matter, there’s no universe where Haiti is going to outperform Hong Kong, or Niger will outperform Norway. The only way international “equality” can be reached is if unlimited mass immigration reduces every country to the lowest common denominator—which may be the whole reason why globalists support it so much.

The effects of Failure Migration also distort the domestic politics of successful societies. Puerto Rico has been a festering sore on the U.S. for decades now, and cutting it loose is long overdue. Yet because Puerto Ricans have been given American citizenship, to some degree the damage is already done because so many have moved to the American mainland. While possessing American citizenship, they retain their Puerto Rican national consciousness, resentments against the Historic American nation, and Leftist voting habits.

Thus, NY-14 primary victor Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez can brag about how her Puerto Rican-born mother “scrubbed toilets” so she could be in America. She criticized the (white, male) incumbent for not speaking Spanish in a constituency that is now almost entirely post-American, less than 20 percent white [“Demographics” Did Help Ocasio-Cortez Win, and That’s a Good Thing, by Christina Cauterucci, Slate, July 1, 2018]. Now, because Americans made the mistake of subsidizing Puerto Rico over the last century and awarding them citizenship, they will be punished by having to deal with Ocasio-Cortez’ anti-white racial socialism, increasingly the dominant ideology of the post-Obama Democratic Party [Obama’s racial socialism, by Gregory Hood, Counter Currents, July 30, 2014]. If Puerto Rico had been cut away, Americans might not have to deal with this woman (or, for that matter, many of her constituents).

Civilization depends upon boundaries, just as markets depend on property rights. A people or nation can only build a good life and a secure future by ensuring its fate is not captive to the failures of others.

On paper, America is the strongest nation-state that has ever existed, yet our future is held hostage to every resentful wretch found around the globe. Even President Trump is begging Mexico’s new president to help us secure our own border [Trump predicts border help from Mexico’s president elect after call, by Steven Nelson, Washington Examiner, July 2, 2018].

In the end, the only thing that can stop the endless tide of failure and degeneracy is what Pat Buchanan called “force, rooted in justice, and backed by moral courage.” America’s future, and the future of every civilized nation around the world, depends on possessing the will to put one’s own people first.

President Trump already has the tools he needs to secure the future of this country in terms of his Supreme Court-sanctioned legal powers, the possibility of taxing remittances, and using the military to build a wall.

He must not keep getting on his knees to the leaders of failed countries who have no reason to help him—or America.

James Kirkpatrick [Email him] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc.

 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Immigration, Latin America, Mexico 
Hide 56 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Medvedev says:

    Our main problem is millions of self-hating liberals and Jews who hate and resent White America.
    With sane laws and policies and without anti-American pc hysteria it would be very easy to protect our borders:
    - build the wall;
    - enforce the law of the land;
    - kick off ‘infiltrators’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stan d Mute

    Our main problem is millions of self-hating liberals and Jews who hate and resent White America.
     
    See what I mean?

    It’s all them, their fault, I have no agency. Can’t do nothing. So gimme the clicker and let’s watch some sportsball on tv...
    , @AndrewR
    Well, they're part of the problem, but calling them the "main problem" ignores power structures. The anti-white academics and activists are useful idiots of insatiable global capitalists to whom borders are an intolerable inconvenience.
    , @Jordi
    Good read.

    Solutions exist, and should be sought. They would include a 20years moratorium on all immigration . America has a huge deficit, and needs money. How about a 20% tax on overseas money transfers ?

    Remittances are a drag on America's wealth, no reason to allow the fleecing to continue. Make America Rich Again !

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. James Kirkpatrick keeps writing persuasive articles about why it is imperative for Americans–if we are to remain prosperous, cohesive, and free–to preserve our European-derived culture and demographic core.

    Why? Orderliness, conscientiousness, industriousness and innovation do not happen by accident.

    What kind of civilization shall America resemble?–Great Britain and Germany?

    Or Haiti and Honduras?

    It is the citizens within a nation who make that culture desirable and safe. Not the reverse.

    ‘American exceptionalism’ (to use a somewhat arrogant term) is a product of our nation’s founding, European stock. It’s rare. It’s precious.

    E pluribus unum. Remember?

    Once these plain facts were taken for granted and widely embraced. But no more.

    Today, the ‘proposition nation’ myth has taken root. But this is a politically correct fairy tale, circulated by multiculturalists, ‘progressives’, and saboteurs. Despite their claims, demographics do matter. Stubbornly so. And ‘change’ is not always for the better. Some win. Others lose.

    Regulating immigration (especially from Third World countries) should therefore not be controversial or taboo. Not in the slightest. Yet it is.

    Why apologize for racial and cultural self-preservation?

    Isn’t ‘self-preservation’ a natural right for any people? Isn’t it entirely normal?

    Yes it is.

    Says Kirkpatrick: “it is impossible for any country to solve its longstanding problems if it is morally obligated to absorb the costs of every other country’s failures.”

    These ‘failures’ include the needy, migrating underclass of neighboring failed states.

    But if the US hopes to maintain its First World standards and enviable way of life, its demographic profile and cultural moorings must be preserved. Doing otherwise is not only counterproductive but subversive.

    These salient facts reminds us that America’s liberal wing is behaving badly. Very badly. Our country’s future (and our children’s future) hang in the balance.

    It must be stated: unlawful and un-democratic ‘Open Borders’ policies increase political discord; they increase domestic disunity; and they enlarge domestic poverty and dysfunction.

    Consider also the downward plight of American public sch00ls, where an avalanche of foreign languages now collide in the public classroom. Is this desirable? Of course not.

    How many students have been harmed by this out-of-control experiment?

    Due to (((liberal))) US immigration laws, these unpopular transformations are not only dangerous, but irreversible.

    Why take this path?

    Kirkpatrick explains that we are fast approaching a cultural/political tipping point.

    If Trump fails to stem this tide, our white-dominated, English-speaking culture might be lost.

    Why should white Americans take such a risk?

    There’s so little to gain, yet so much to lose.

    Indeed, if you want the US to resemble a Banana Republic, just sneak in a vast underclass from dysfunctional states. It’s that simple.

    And the process is now underway.

    Significantly, America’s (((mainstream media))) continues to play a pivotal and supporting role in this ongoing transformation. Lawful attempts to resist this invasion–even non-violently–are declared ‘racist’.

    Meanwhile, America is being clobbered by multiculturalism, bilingualism, sexual fragmentation, and the crusade to ‘spread’ democracy by any means necessary. Yet barriers endure. Tensions mount.

    So why exacerbate America’s long-term race problem with the addition of millions of poor, uneducated, Spanish-speaking mesoAmericans?

    Is this not adding fuel to this fire?

    Kirkpatrick notes also that as long as failed states such as Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala and even Mexico routinely flush their underclass northward, the elites in these corrupt oligarchies can resist reform and remain in power. This is nice for them. But there are huge costs for us..

    This unsought experiment has produced a political equation that is hopelessly unbalanced.

    It could spell our demise.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62
    As you know, I very much enjoy reading your thoughful posts, Mark. This is just another stellar example. Look forward to the next one.
    , @Stan d Mute

    These salient facts reminds us that America’s liberal wing is behaving badly. Very badly.
     
    I can’t even get through the comments, at #2 and we are batting 1000 (to use a term sportsball fans can understand). So what, who cares what the “liberal wing” is doing? Are America’s “conservatives” doing anything? Liberals are by definition a pack of limp wristed pansies, I bullied them relentlessly in school, the most they ever did was wet their panties and snitch to the teachers. Are they really stopping us from evicting the invaders or putting mines and tanks on the border? If they’re not stopping us, who is?
    , @KA
    re-https://lobelog.com/the-politics-behind-the-sabotage-of-the-iran-deal-in-europe/

    UKIP supports Trump's agenda on Iran . UKIP is blocking the resolutions which would enhance the chances of survival of JCOPA . This is the same UKIP who wants immigration from ME and Africa be stopped and the flow be reversed . So why are they creating the atmosphere that might lead to war and migration? Why are they preparing the ground for the war ?

    Venezuela is another example where the polices of America have always been to throw the regime out at any cost including through sanctions on import and export of simple products like baby food , medicines, school supplies, diapers and cereals beef and edibles .
    Trump went one step further looking for ways to invade that country .

    Immigration is the end result (of war ) from which far rights in EU get the tailwinds to sail . It seems those leaders want to continue down that path to score victory on ballot. When will they be exposed?

    It seems it is easier to go to Hondurus and ask them to stop migration but it is very difficult for these intelligent leaders to come to senses and understand the internal ( western ) origin of the dynamics.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. George says:

    “Now, because Americans made the mistake of subsidizing Puerto Rico”

    Puerto Rico is a colony. The US could have made PR an independent country but did not. It was not a mistake, there is a group of Americans that enjoy being bigshots and having colonies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    This is an under-appreciated point. Open Borders are just domestic imperialism or, as Whiskey puts it, passive-aggressive imperialism. It's the same attitude that makes a certain class of white people want to hire squat, illiterate Aztecs as opposed to a white or even black countryman, who can ask you in your own language if you caught the game last night, like they're a fellow citizen or something.
    , @myself

    there is a group of Americans that enjoy being bigshots and having colonies.
     
    This is an absolutely crucial observation.

    In the 19th century, American elites always looked with envy at the European top-echelon, specifically at the latter being colonial and imperial overlords.

    It was a sign of having proven their worthiness to sit at the top table when, at the end of the 1800s, America's rulers finally acquired overseas colonies, to include Puerto Rico and the Philippines.

    Finally, the non-slave owning white American could play "Pukka Sahib", not with Punjabis, but with native Filipinos, Central Americans and Hawaiians! America had arrived! It must have been a most satisfying feeling - to be the master by sheer dint of Providence and being born American - glorious.

    And now, it's biting us in the *ss. Historical blowback.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. @George
    "Now, because Americans made the mistake of subsidizing Puerto Rico"

    Puerto Rico is a colony. The US could have made PR an independent country but did not. It was not a mistake, there is a group of Americans that enjoy being bigshots and having colonies.

    This is an under-appreciated point. Open Borders are just domestic imperialism or, as Whiskey puts it, passive-aggressive imperialism. It’s the same attitude that makes a certain class of white people want to hire squat, illiterate Aztecs as opposed to a white or even black countryman, who can ask you in your own language if you caught the game last night, like they’re a fellow citizen or something.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. “Even President Trump is begging Mexico’s new president to help us secure our own border.”

    Offer $100k to the 100 million working-age Americans not in the workforce to resettle in Mexico. Even if only 10m take it, it will make a difference.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  6. If “fleeing violence” qualifies one for “asylum,” every Latin American in the world qualifies for entry into the United States.

    Not to mention every African.

    Read More
    • Replies: @europeasant
    There are about one billion Sub-Saharan Africans and there are at least four hundred thousand people living south of the USA. The projections are that Sub-Saharan Africa will be at two billion in the next 20 or 30 years . A truly frightening thought in a Democracy.

    Even if ten percent of them come to the USA it would be a very crowded country.

    It would be the end of European people ruling the USA.

    In my ward which has been redistricted a number of years ago the so called Hispanics are now 65% of the population of the ward and of course the Hispanics rule.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. myself says:
    @George
    "Now, because Americans made the mistake of subsidizing Puerto Rico"

    Puerto Rico is a colony. The US could have made PR an independent country but did not. It was not a mistake, there is a group of Americans that enjoy being bigshots and having colonies.

    there is a group of Americans that enjoy being bigshots and having colonies.

    This is an absolutely crucial observation.

    In the 19th century, American elites always looked with envy at the European top-echelon, specifically at the latter being colonial and imperial overlords.

    It was a sign of having proven their worthiness to sit at the top table when, at the end of the 1800s, America’s rulers finally acquired overseas colonies, to include Puerto Rico and the Philippines.

    Finally, the non-slave owning white American could play “Pukka Sahib”, not with Punjabis, but with native Filipinos, Central Americans and Hawaiians! America had arrived! It must have been a most satisfying feeling – to be the master by sheer dint of Providence and being born American – glorious.

    And now, it’s biting us in the *ss. Historical blowback.

    Read More
    • Agree: Clyde
    • Replies: @Clyde
    The 19th and 20th century versions of invade the world was fun because there was no inviting. Those whose who lived in Central American banana export nations. etc knew they were meant to stay in place. Not come here. Mexicans knew they must stay in Mexico, NAFTA blew this up.

    The only large exception was Vietnam. We went in there, 55 thousand Americans died. In return we have at least 2 million Vietnamese.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. The discussion between Merkel and Orban of Hungary is quite simple: Orban ‘we want to choose ourselves with whom we live together’, Merkel ‘the foundation of Europe (she hardly ever uses the word EU) is humanism’.
    If humanism includes destroying one’s own culture, as far as I know she never was asked.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Urban of Hungary should try to limit its interaction with US ,France and UK when these 3 countries get excited about imposing sanctions or waging wars by direct and indirect means . It should also limit its role in supporting Saudi ,Israel, or any French initiatives in Niger and Mali or Chad. People affected by the indirect and direct contributions from Orabns' country have a right to a piece of the land Orban struts along .
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Tyrion 2 says: • Website

    This is an excellent article. Practically every other sentence is outstanding, even absorbed individually, and the whole is somehow more than the already substantial sum of its parts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. Renoman says:

    Get tough now so your children won’t have to clean up your mess you rancid pussy’s.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  11. James

    Stop picking on the Venezuelan Goverment. Whatever economic policy mistakes it made….it should not be used as an excuse to use US taxpayer $$$$$ to destabilize Venezuelan Society. I do not want the scummy Venezuelan “White” elite moving to America and having a say in our people’s fate. More endless wars….the anti-commie crusade

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. E pluribus bunkum. The Great European New World Migration has failed and decivilization has thwarted the Founding Oligarchy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  13. Rich says:

    Thucydides is still proven correct because it is the strong and powerful in the US who want the swarms of illegals in the US so they can pay them subsistence wages and keep the wages of average Americans down. In poll after poll the American people have shown they want an end to this invasion, but the rich and powerful want more illegals to mow their lawns, babysit their kids and clean their toilets, so what do we get? More illegals.

    I guess you can’t blame these oligarchs, they look at the oligarchy South of the Border with envy, dreaming of having millions of peons to mistreat and abuse, but since the descendants of the people who built the US won’t do that, they have to import peons who will.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  14. mal says:

    Scuttling ICE would mean all one has to do to live in America is get a plane ticket and overstay the travel visa. Paul Ryan’s latest amnesty attempt didn’t include Everify, so legitimate employment would have been available to the newly flown-in illegal.
    The left and neocons/GOPe are still obviously working together. I’m sure Soros could afford many plane tickets.

    BTW….if I break into a bank at night with my kid and get caught, won’t the cops seperate me from my child when I’m arrested for criminal trespassing, even if I didn’t get in the vault? Hell, the kid would probably be put up for adoption while I was serving my jail sentence right?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. Tecumseh says:

    Great post, thank you! I was aware of the remittances but not the scale and consequences they bring. I am troubled by the lack of courage on the part of the administration. Never before has a president had the kind of mandate this man has to potentially end this invasion. Simply ending the invasion is not nearly enough to solve the problems but it would be a start. Mass deportations would naturally follow the successful closing of the southern border. I have said before and will now say again “If the president called for Americans to stream toward our southern border and begin protecting our nation from this economic Normandy, Americans would respond immediately. I believe enough to make a difference. Yes there would likely be bloodshed initially and probably for some time, however those making violence would most likely be “coyotes”. Mexico is a failed Narco State. Anyone believing differently and trusting that a “magic politician” like Alpo or whatever his name is, has somehow avoided a “bullet selfie” is dreaming. Hope is not a tactic. Close the border, violently if needed and begin deporting every illegal you can find. Trump holds the trump card, I just don’t think he wants to use it. Being a billionaire is pretty comfortable from what I’ve seen. Joe’s kid tried going “off script” but ended up with no one on the back of his limo. Trumpty ain’t gonna do that, he’s a smart guy and an earner. I pray for all who are willing to defend this country from foreign invasion and also fervently pray that they stop fucking around in the ME and come home and help close the border. Import the 3rd world, become the 3rd world.

    Read More
    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @Russ

    Mexico is a failed Narco State. Anyone believing differently and trusting that a “magic politician” like Alpo or whatever his name is, has somehow avoided a “bullet selfie” is dreaming.
     
    Have to wonder if this supposed Mexican Hugo Chavez just elected won't be a useful villain for Trump. I for one would dearly love to see AMLO mouth it up, and Trump respond by repositioning U.S. troops from Germany to the southern border ... with forays south of the southern border as needed.
    , @Stan d Mute
    MI?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. rienzi says:

    The solution is really quite simple. We don’t especially want these Latin-American invaders, but there IS a first-world country out there whose government just loves immigrants. The more the merrier.

    Instead of those caught by ICE being sent back to their native climes, why don’t we cram them into military transports, fly them to our airbases in Germany, and then shove them out the main gate into the welcoming arms of Angela Merkel. Imagine her joy and respect for our help in her effort to fill Germany to bursting with non-Germans.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  17. KenH says:

    The ironic result of all this: the worse Mexico performs, the more powerful that nation becomes. Many nominal American citizens believe their first loyalty is with Mexico. Though they don’t want to live there, they don’t want to surrender their identity.

    Mexicans want the best of both worlds just like every other third world demographic. They and others just want to create parallel societies and ethnostates within America while enjoying all of the economic, social and fringe benefits that America has to offer but that they can’t get in their native countries.

    This is a recipe for ethnic and religious conflict and civil war. There was a book titled Importing Revolution back in the 90′s which is what our immigration policy since 1965 has effectively achieved. The bottom line is you can’t keep a lid on racial and ethnic tension forever and eventually America will exhaust and bankrupt itself to where it can’t fund the police state agencies to prevent the widely disparate racial groups from harming each other. Punitive legal measures like all of the communist inspired civil rights legislation and brute force is the only way multiracial societies are held together.

    If Central Americans want to move to Mexico then Fredrico Reed should be all for it. The more the merrier. The average Central American has much more in common racially and culturally with the average Mestizo than the average Mestizo has in common with the average white or black American. So it’s a match made in heaven.

    I’ll even donate if they build a sprawling housing project for Central Americans somewhere very near where Fred and his lovely Violeta reside. Would be even better if they throw in around 50 MS-13 members.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  18. Russ says:
    @Tecumseh
    Great post, thank you! I was aware of the remittances but not the scale and consequences they bring. I am troubled by the lack of courage on the part of the administration. Never before has a president had the kind of mandate this man has to potentially end this invasion. Simply ending the invasion is not nearly enough to solve the problems but it would be a start. Mass deportations would naturally follow the successful closing of the southern border. I have said before and will now say again "If the president called for Americans to stream toward our southern border and begin protecting our nation from this economic Normandy, Americans would respond immediately. I believe enough to make a difference. Yes there would likely be bloodshed initially and probably for some time, however those making violence would most likely be "coyotes". Mexico is a failed Narco State. Anyone believing differently and trusting that a "magic politician" like Alpo or whatever his name is, has somehow avoided a "bullet selfie" is dreaming. Hope is not a tactic. Close the border, violently if needed and begin deporting every illegal you can find. Trump holds the trump card, I just don't think he wants to use it. Being a billionaire is pretty comfortable from what I've seen. Joe's kid tried going "off script" but ended up with no one on the back of his limo. Trumpty ain't gonna do that, he's a smart guy and an earner. I pray for all who are willing to defend this country from foreign invasion and also fervently pray that they stop fucking around in the ME and come home and help close the border. Import the 3rd world, become the 3rd world.

    Mexico is a failed Narco State. Anyone believing differently and trusting that a “magic politician” like Alpo or whatever his name is, has somehow avoided a “bullet selfie” is dreaming.

    Have to wonder if this supposed Mexican Hugo Chavez just elected won’t be a useful villain for Trump. I for one would dearly love to see AMLO mouth it up, and Trump respond by repositioning U.S. troops from Germany to the southern border … with forays south of the southern border as needed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. Two options-

    End all welfare payments to illegals

    Offer to continue welfare payments for two years in a country of their choice but not this one.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  20. geokat62 says:
    @mark green
    James Kirkpatrick keeps writing persuasive articles about why it is imperative for Americans--if we are to remain prosperous, cohesive, and free--to preserve our European-derived culture and demographic core.

    Why? Orderliness, conscientiousness, industriousness and innovation do not happen by accident.

    What kind of civilization shall America resemble?--Great Britain and Germany?

    Or Haiti and Honduras?

    It is the citizens within a nation who make that culture desirable and safe. Not the reverse.

    'American exceptionalism' (to use a somewhat arrogant term) is a product of our nation's founding, European stock. It's rare. It's precious.

    E pluribus unum. Remember?

    Once these plain facts were taken for granted and widely embraced. But no more.

    Today, the 'proposition nation' myth has taken root. But this is a politically correct fairy tale, circulated by multiculturalists, 'progressives', and saboteurs. Despite their claims, demographics do matter. Stubbornly so. And 'change' is not always for the better. Some win. Others lose.

    Regulating immigration (especially from Third World countries) should therefore not be controversial or taboo. Not in the slightest. Yet it is.

    Why apologize for racial and cultural self-preservation?

    Isn't 'self-preservation' a natural right for any people? Isn't it entirely normal?

    Yes it is.

    Says Kirkpatrick: "it is impossible for any country to solve its longstanding problems if it is morally obligated to absorb the costs of every other country’s failures."

    These 'failures' include the needy, migrating underclass of neighboring failed states.

    But if the US hopes to maintain its First World standards and enviable way of life, its demographic profile and cultural moorings must be preserved. Doing otherwise is not only counterproductive but subversive.

    These salient facts reminds us that America's liberal wing is behaving badly. Very badly. Our country's future (and our children's future) hang in the balance.

    It must be stated: unlawful and un-democratic 'Open Borders' policies increase political discord; they increase domestic disunity; and they enlarge domestic poverty and dysfunction.

    Consider also the downward plight of American public sch00ls, where an avalanche of foreign languages now collide in the public classroom. Is this desirable? Of course not.

    How many students have been harmed by this out-of-control experiment?

    Due to (((liberal))) US immigration laws, these unpopular transformations are not only dangerous, but irreversible.

    Why take this path?

    Kirkpatrick explains that we are fast approaching a cultural/political tipping point.

    If Trump fails to stem this tide, our white-dominated, English-speaking culture might be lost.

    Why should white Americans take such a risk?

    There's so little to gain, yet so much to lose.

    Indeed, if you want the US to resemble a Banana Republic, just sneak in a vast underclass from dysfunctional states. It's that simple.

    And the process is now underway.

    Significantly, America's (((mainstream media))) continues to play a pivotal and supporting role in this ongoing transformation. Lawful attempts to resist this invasion--even non-violently--are declared 'racist'.

    Meanwhile, America is being clobbered by multiculturalism, bilingualism, sexual fragmentation, and the crusade to 'spread' democracy by any means necessary. Yet barriers endure. Tensions mount.

    So why exacerbate America's long-term race problem with the addition of millions of poor, uneducated, Spanish-speaking mesoAmericans?

    Is this not adding fuel to this fire?

    Kirkpatrick notes also that as long as failed states such as Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala and even Mexico routinely flush their underclass northward, the elites in these corrupt oligarchies can resist reform and remain in power. This is nice for them. But there are huge costs for us..

    This unsought experiment has produced a political equation that is hopelessly unbalanced.

    It could spell our demise.

    As you know, I very much enjoy reading your thoughful posts, Mark. This is just another stellar example. Look forward to the next one.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mark green
    Thanx, Geo! Always nice to hear from you as well. -mg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. For the longest time, Pat Buchanan has been complaining about the southern ‘cesspool’ but never ever, has he once said that let’s send in the marines to clease it of its white overlords, who are directly responsible for the threat and his ersatz, James Kirkpatrick doesn’t say so now. As long as you protect the trash that runs Latin America, there will be no respite from the flood of humanity. Do you have the willingness to go into Mexico to kill your racial kith and kin to save your own backyard from noxious miasma of the non white, illegal immigrants? If not, STFU!

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Buchanan is a Roman Catholic who accepts black/Asian priests-popes. He is a useless cuck when it comes to defending and saving the West. His scribbles but that's it. When he ran for the presidency in 1992, he chose a black woman as his running mate. He is an evil coward.
    , @Dagon Shield
    The putative pugilist is verbalist nonpareil; however, his Roman Catholic upbringing will always put him short of that oomph, found in a Baptist, needed to flush out the toilet on the southern border.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. I’ve had similar thoughts lately regarding the relation between management and their employees in the modern workplace.

    Management today has a truly impossible task. It seems you’re not even allowed to so much as tell your employees to perform their jobs correctly in a firm tone of voice, but meanwhile employees can call in sick, show up drunk, go home in the middle of the day, talk, goof off, ignore performance standards, and yell back at the boss, and they’re basically untouchable. All the “rights” are on the side of the workers and none of the responsibilities. The management has responsibilities but no rights.

    I call this “making the weak strong.” By this I mean that the force of law is all on the side of those who need to be taken care of, who have the least skin in the game, and who have the lightest and least defined duties vis-a-vis the organization. In our highly feminized society we seem to make all the weak strong—employees against their bosses, immigrants against natives, welfare moochers against the productive, minorities against majorities, women against men.

    There are examples of societies that took the opposite approach of making the strong strong, who understood that the force of law must not shackle the mighty and that along with greater responsibility goes greater liberty. The Roman system in its heyday was one of these. I often can’t help but think that if my employees behaved toward a Roman proconsul the way they behave toward me, the officer would have simply removed their heads. He would have been entirely right to do so, and the laws of his society would have defended and compelled his actions. The laws of our society would put you in prison for murder and you would be dismissed as a lunatic or a psycho who “couldn’t control his anger.”

    But there are serious negative consequences for any society that makes the weak strong; and while the opposite, masculine societies offer up their own potential for abuse (i.e. the cruelty of the strong against the weak, the latter of whom may have no recourse even when they are in the right), I would say that this is by far the lesser of two evils. By empowering the weak and shielding people from the consequences of their own misbehavior, we have bred a huge amount of dependency—millions upon millions of people whose contributions to society do not justify their existence and who must subsist on the backs of the productive. We have destroyed legitimate authority in almost every field, deconstructed the family and the church and other necessary organs, polluted honest scholarship, and perverted the very notions of accomplishment, honor, and worthiness. We have created a society where “the strong” no longer have the right to exist, where the best people, rather than gracing society with their talents, are driven to isolation, despondency, madness, and suicide.

    This feminization of the culture must stop or it will certainly destroy us all. We have already gone deep into the error and a purge of immense proportions will be necessary to restore order, but it’s hard to see how that can be brought about.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. Sam Francis On Anarcho-Tyranny in 2004

    Anarcho-Tyranny—Where Multiculturalism Leads:

    Unwilling to control immigration and the cultural disintegration it causes, the authorities instead control the law-abiding.

    This is precisely the bizarre system of misrule I have elsewhere described as “anarcho-tyranny”—we refuse to control real criminals (that`s the anarchy) so we control the innocent (that`s the tyranny).

    What is now becoming obvious in Europe…ought to be no less obvious to our own decrepit rulers here.

    It`s already obvious to those they rule.

    All they need is a leader with the guts and brains to say it out loud.

    Mass Immigration Is Anarcho-Tyranny

    Tweet from 2015:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anthony Aaron
    We've been punishing the innocent for more than a century -- not wanting to cause some sort of psychological trauma to the guilty.

    We don't punish thieves -- we spend billion$ on electronic and other measures to prevent theft; we don't punish illegal aliens -- we spend billion$ on their SNAP, HUD, EITC, welfare, MEDICAL and other benefits -- all of which are paid by US Citizens and Taxpayers; we don't punish youth for committing crimes in schools -- b h o signed an Executive Order demanding 'equal outcomes' of criminal reports for blacks, hispanics and whites -- even though the blacks and hispanics commit the overwhelming bulk of such crimes -- all of which results in situations like Travon Martin and the guy who shot kids in his Florida high school -- both of whom should have been in the criminal justice system, but for b h o's EO.

    Countless other examples exist … but you get my drift.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. Blah, blah, blah.. Boring!

    Americans are too busy watching the Lardassians on TV or cheering their favorite sportsball team of illiterate criminal Africans to worry about unimportant crap like facts or the disappearance of their genome. “Lookie there! One of them Lardassians cut off his pecker and put on a dress. And Tyrone done ran fast with the sportsball! Gimme the clicker, Rachel Madcow is about to come on the teevee…”

    We truly deserve what is happening to us. That’s the worst fact of all. Our ENTIRE culture is rotten to the maggot infested core. Even hardcore 2A 3%ers drool on their guts watching sportsball and proudly wear the names of African sportsballers on their backs. They claim to oppose third world invasion while stuffing their third chins with greasy nachos. Even when their sons are murdered and their daughters raped, they do nothing. Then they blame “the joos”…

    Read More
    • Replies: @EagleEye
    Could not have said it better myself, bravo. But a couple of comments ......not sure about how many of these Latin American countries have been cohearsed and strong armed for decades in order for the American elite to fleece them. Not mentioned in this article. A great many of these people have been marginalized by Americas incessant meddling in their affairs. abetted of course by the local ruling elite. And often with extreme violence. Just like in the Middle East, everywhere America puts its finger there is ensuing chaos and misery....hence the massive flight to escape. They bring their hatred with them, anyone blame them?
    I think the writer correct on many points however . I have a huge beef with the double standard of most of the countries that profit from immigration to the US. First Mexico...I have lived there for going on 32 years. I was married at one point to a Mexican. I have the standard FM2 document that allows me to enter. For the last 10 years I have worked outside of Mexico and have not stayed put inside for a complete 2 years, the requirement for me to get a passport. Now, I have my principal residence in Mexico for 32 years, I have a business with employees and I own properties. For those first 22 years I did not stay out as I have lately...still they will not give me a passport. I speak and write fluent Spanish and have many Mexican "friends" and business connections. I deal in Fine Art and at some time or another have had dealings all the way up to the presidency in past administrations. I could be a consultant on anything Mexican......have been robbed at gunpoint and had employees beat up and robbed. I know the people. One thing that I can tell you , it is embedded in the psyche of each and every Mexican alive to one day repossess the parts of the US that was stolen from them and have revenge for the many arrogant and humiliating transgressions perpetrated against them. I honestly cannot blame them for that but each time I see a married couple purposely fly to Houston or San Diego and check into a hospital to have their new baby born and automatically be given a US passport.....it pisses me off.
    Now there is another country that I also have intimate knowledge of and that is Turkey and for lack of time I will not give examples but it is worse than Mexico ........When I saw Erdogan's henchmen bloodying some people in Washington and pushing his disgusting weight around at Mohammad Ali's funeral I was really PISSED. And the good ole' USofA? Bombing half the world and fleecing it's own massively ignorant and downright stupid population ........I have not lived there in 32 years, I speak 2 foreign languages and a little of a third........no plan to go back to watch the fireworks. There are some good points here that I agree about in this immigration issue.....but the fault lies with America. It is beyond the time when it can right itself in a practical way........ignorance at this point is not an excuse.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. @Medvedev
    Our main problem is millions of self-hating liberals and Jews who hate and resent White America.
    With sane laws and policies and without anti-American pc hysteria it would be very easy to protect our borders:
    - build the wall;
    - enforce the law of the land;
    - kick off 'infiltrators'.

    Our main problem is millions of self-hating liberals and Jews who hate and resent White America.

    See what I mean?

    It’s all them, their fault, I have no agency. Can’t do nothing. So gimme the clicker and let’s watch some sportsball on tv…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. @mark green
    James Kirkpatrick keeps writing persuasive articles about why it is imperative for Americans--if we are to remain prosperous, cohesive, and free--to preserve our European-derived culture and demographic core.

    Why? Orderliness, conscientiousness, industriousness and innovation do not happen by accident.

    What kind of civilization shall America resemble?--Great Britain and Germany?

    Or Haiti and Honduras?

    It is the citizens within a nation who make that culture desirable and safe. Not the reverse.

    'American exceptionalism' (to use a somewhat arrogant term) is a product of our nation's founding, European stock. It's rare. It's precious.

    E pluribus unum. Remember?

    Once these plain facts were taken for granted and widely embraced. But no more.

    Today, the 'proposition nation' myth has taken root. But this is a politically correct fairy tale, circulated by multiculturalists, 'progressives', and saboteurs. Despite their claims, demographics do matter. Stubbornly so. And 'change' is not always for the better. Some win. Others lose.

    Regulating immigration (especially from Third World countries) should therefore not be controversial or taboo. Not in the slightest. Yet it is.

    Why apologize for racial and cultural self-preservation?

    Isn't 'self-preservation' a natural right for any people? Isn't it entirely normal?

    Yes it is.

    Says Kirkpatrick: "it is impossible for any country to solve its longstanding problems if it is morally obligated to absorb the costs of every other country’s failures."

    These 'failures' include the needy, migrating underclass of neighboring failed states.

    But if the US hopes to maintain its First World standards and enviable way of life, its demographic profile and cultural moorings must be preserved. Doing otherwise is not only counterproductive but subversive.

    These salient facts reminds us that America's liberal wing is behaving badly. Very badly. Our country's future (and our children's future) hang in the balance.

    It must be stated: unlawful and un-democratic 'Open Borders' policies increase political discord; they increase domestic disunity; and they enlarge domestic poverty and dysfunction.

    Consider also the downward plight of American public sch00ls, where an avalanche of foreign languages now collide in the public classroom. Is this desirable? Of course not.

    How many students have been harmed by this out-of-control experiment?

    Due to (((liberal))) US immigration laws, these unpopular transformations are not only dangerous, but irreversible.

    Why take this path?

    Kirkpatrick explains that we are fast approaching a cultural/political tipping point.

    If Trump fails to stem this tide, our white-dominated, English-speaking culture might be lost.

    Why should white Americans take such a risk?

    There's so little to gain, yet so much to lose.

    Indeed, if you want the US to resemble a Banana Republic, just sneak in a vast underclass from dysfunctional states. It's that simple.

    And the process is now underway.

    Significantly, America's (((mainstream media))) continues to play a pivotal and supporting role in this ongoing transformation. Lawful attempts to resist this invasion--even non-violently--are declared 'racist'.

    Meanwhile, America is being clobbered by multiculturalism, bilingualism, sexual fragmentation, and the crusade to 'spread' democracy by any means necessary. Yet barriers endure. Tensions mount.

    So why exacerbate America's long-term race problem with the addition of millions of poor, uneducated, Spanish-speaking mesoAmericans?

    Is this not adding fuel to this fire?

    Kirkpatrick notes also that as long as failed states such as Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala and even Mexico routinely flush their underclass northward, the elites in these corrupt oligarchies can resist reform and remain in power. This is nice for them. But there are huge costs for us..

    This unsought experiment has produced a political equation that is hopelessly unbalanced.

    It could spell our demise.

    These salient facts reminds us that America’s liberal wing is behaving badly. Very badly.

    I can’t even get through the comments, at #2 and we are batting 1000 (to use a term sportsball fans can understand). So what, who cares what the “liberal wing” is doing? Are America’s “conservatives” doing anything? Liberals are by definition a pack of limp wristed pansies, I bullied them relentlessly in school, the most they ever did was wet their panties and snitch to the teachers. Are they really stopping us from evicting the invaders or putting mines and tanks on the border? If they’re not stopping us, who is?

    Read More
    • Replies: @mark green
    Good point. The one defense I will offer on behalf of the GOP concerns political taboos and public perception. Average voters, remember, watch a lot of TV. They don't read UNZ (unfortunately).

    Thus the racism boogeyman has paralyzed the conservative establishment (GOP, more or less) from doing what it successfully accomplished under Eisenhower ('Operation Wetback'), which was the speedy and successful deportation of tens of thousands of illegal 'wetbacks' (as they were once called) from the American southwest.

    Today's reigning liberal zeitgeist no longer tolerates that level of white solidarity and white purposefulness. OK, sure, Chamber of Commerce types do like cheap labor. And so also do a lot of the GOP elites.

    But rich, country club conservatives who run the GOP are also aware that the Spanish-speaking wave of illegal underachievers now entering America from below the Rio Grande vote overwhelmingly Democrat. This fact is fully understood.

    So clearly, the GOP--from top to bottom doesn't--want these gate-crashers (or their offspring) colonizing America. These demographic trends will inevitably marginalize the interests of the GOP's base as well as its white leadership. It's a problem that is understood.

    But these so-called conservatives are both worried and scared all the same.

    If they're identified by (((intellectuals/pundits))) as acting too aggressively on this issue (immigration), they will be tarred as 'nativist' or 'racist'. It's a bullshit charge but it can be career-ending.

    Like the smear of being tarred an 'anti-Semite', charges of (white) racism can spell political death. Recall that fact that even a millionaire movie star (Mel Gibson) was nearly destroyed for crossing a rhetorical 'red line' by making private comments that offended the Chosen People. These taboos are real.

    America's so-called conservative leadership is just too timid to go up against the prevailing zeitgeist which identifies 'racism' (including 'white advocacy') as a profound moral failing.

    These taboos ultimately serves the Dems, their base, as well as their various (((donors))).

    All these taboos are maintained by various 'experts' who dominate (and own) America's glorious (((mainstream media))). That's the unpleasant situation. This is why even Pat Buchanan must pull his punches.

    , @AndrewR
    We appreciate you identifying yourself as an unrepentant bully.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. @Tecumseh
    Great post, thank you! I was aware of the remittances but not the scale and consequences they bring. I am troubled by the lack of courage on the part of the administration. Never before has a president had the kind of mandate this man has to potentially end this invasion. Simply ending the invasion is not nearly enough to solve the problems but it would be a start. Mass deportations would naturally follow the successful closing of the southern border. I have said before and will now say again "If the president called for Americans to stream toward our southern border and begin protecting our nation from this economic Normandy, Americans would respond immediately. I believe enough to make a difference. Yes there would likely be bloodshed initially and probably for some time, however those making violence would most likely be "coyotes". Mexico is a failed Narco State. Anyone believing differently and trusting that a "magic politician" like Alpo or whatever his name is, has somehow avoided a "bullet selfie" is dreaming. Hope is not a tactic. Close the border, violently if needed and begin deporting every illegal you can find. Trump holds the trump card, I just don't think he wants to use it. Being a billionaire is pretty comfortable from what I've seen. Joe's kid tried going "off script" but ended up with no one on the back of his limo. Trumpty ain't gonna do that, he's a smart guy and an earner. I pray for all who are willing to defend this country from foreign invasion and also fervently pray that they stop fucking around in the ME and come home and help close the border. Import the 3rd world, become the 3rd world.

    MI?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. “President Trump already has the tools he needs to secure the future of this country in terms of his Supreme Court-sanctioned legal powers, the possibility of taxing remittances, and using the military to build a wall.”

    Correct, but Trump has cucked and will do nothing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. @Dagon Shield
    For the longest time, Pat Buchanan has been complaining about the southern 'cesspool' but never ever, has he once said that let's send in the marines to clease it of its white overlords, who are directly responsible for the threat and his ersatz, James Kirkpatrick doesn't say so now. As long as you protect the trash that runs Latin America, there will be no respite from the flood of humanity. Do you have the willingness to go into Mexico to kill your racial kith and kin to save your own backyard from noxious miasma of the non white, illegal immigrants? If not, STFU!

    Buchanan is a Roman Catholic who accepts black/Asian priests-popes. He is a useless cuck when it comes to defending and saving the West. His scribbles but that’s it. When he ran for the presidency in 1992, he chose a black woman as his running mate. He is an evil coward.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. The Vox Interview: In Which Barack Obama Agrees With The Late Sam Francis On The Effects Of Mass Immigration

    James Kirkpatrick in 2015:

    Mass immigration transforms a country into just a “hodgepodge of folks” who essentially have nothing in common with each other except that they live under the same government. The constant tension and dysfunction creates its own justification for never ending government intervention and various “community organizers,” “community leaders,” and other rent seekers.

    Tweet from 2015:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. The treasonous rats in the GOP ruling class have been in bed with the Democrat Party anti-White globalizers for decades.

    The treasonous rats in the GOP ruling class are fraudulent scum who pretend to oppose the Democrat Party and globalization.

    The treasonous rats in the GOP ruling class push open borders mass immigration and amnesty for illegal alien invaders.

    The treasonous rats in the GOP ruling class push sovereignty-sapping trade deal scams.

    The treasonous rats in the GOP ruling class push for more endless war that advances no clear interests of the United States.

    The treasonous rats in the GOP ruling class use Anarcho-Tyranny to keep White Core Americans frazzled and continuously on the defensive.

    Tweet from 2016:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  32. KA says:
    @mark green
    James Kirkpatrick keeps writing persuasive articles about why it is imperative for Americans--if we are to remain prosperous, cohesive, and free--to preserve our European-derived culture and demographic core.

    Why? Orderliness, conscientiousness, industriousness and innovation do not happen by accident.

    What kind of civilization shall America resemble?--Great Britain and Germany?

    Or Haiti and Honduras?

    It is the citizens within a nation who make that culture desirable and safe. Not the reverse.

    'American exceptionalism' (to use a somewhat arrogant term) is a product of our nation's founding, European stock. It's rare. It's precious.

    E pluribus unum. Remember?

    Once these plain facts were taken for granted and widely embraced. But no more.

    Today, the 'proposition nation' myth has taken root. But this is a politically correct fairy tale, circulated by multiculturalists, 'progressives', and saboteurs. Despite their claims, demographics do matter. Stubbornly so. And 'change' is not always for the better. Some win. Others lose.

    Regulating immigration (especially from Third World countries) should therefore not be controversial or taboo. Not in the slightest. Yet it is.

    Why apologize for racial and cultural self-preservation?

    Isn't 'self-preservation' a natural right for any people? Isn't it entirely normal?

    Yes it is.

    Says Kirkpatrick: "it is impossible for any country to solve its longstanding problems if it is morally obligated to absorb the costs of every other country’s failures."

    These 'failures' include the needy, migrating underclass of neighboring failed states.

    But if the US hopes to maintain its First World standards and enviable way of life, its demographic profile and cultural moorings must be preserved. Doing otherwise is not only counterproductive but subversive.

    These salient facts reminds us that America's liberal wing is behaving badly. Very badly. Our country's future (and our children's future) hang in the balance.

    It must be stated: unlawful and un-democratic 'Open Borders' policies increase political discord; they increase domestic disunity; and they enlarge domestic poverty and dysfunction.

    Consider also the downward plight of American public sch00ls, where an avalanche of foreign languages now collide in the public classroom. Is this desirable? Of course not.

    How many students have been harmed by this out-of-control experiment?

    Due to (((liberal))) US immigration laws, these unpopular transformations are not only dangerous, but irreversible.

    Why take this path?

    Kirkpatrick explains that we are fast approaching a cultural/political tipping point.

    If Trump fails to stem this tide, our white-dominated, English-speaking culture might be lost.

    Why should white Americans take such a risk?

    There's so little to gain, yet so much to lose.

    Indeed, if you want the US to resemble a Banana Republic, just sneak in a vast underclass from dysfunctional states. It's that simple.

    And the process is now underway.

    Significantly, America's (((mainstream media))) continues to play a pivotal and supporting role in this ongoing transformation. Lawful attempts to resist this invasion--even non-violently--are declared 'racist'.

    Meanwhile, America is being clobbered by multiculturalism, bilingualism, sexual fragmentation, and the crusade to 'spread' democracy by any means necessary. Yet barriers endure. Tensions mount.

    So why exacerbate America's long-term race problem with the addition of millions of poor, uneducated, Spanish-speaking mesoAmericans?

    Is this not adding fuel to this fire?

    Kirkpatrick notes also that as long as failed states such as Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala and even Mexico routinely flush their underclass northward, the elites in these corrupt oligarchies can resist reform and remain in power. This is nice for them. But there are huge costs for us..

    This unsought experiment has produced a political equation that is hopelessly unbalanced.

    It could spell our demise.

    re-https://lobelog.com/the-politics-behind-the-sabotage-of-the-iran-deal-in-europe/

    UKIP supports Trump’s agenda on Iran . UKIP is blocking the resolutions which would enhance the chances of survival of JCOPA . This is the same UKIP who wants immigration from ME and Africa be stopped and the flow be reversed . So why are they creating the atmosphere that might lead to war and migration? Why are they preparing the ground for the war ?

    Venezuela is another example where the polices of America have always been to throw the regime out at any cost including through sanctions on import and export of simple products like baby food , medicines, school supplies, diapers and cereals beef and edibles .
    Trump went one step further looking for ways to invade that country .

    Immigration is the end result (of war ) from which far rights in EU get the tailwinds to sail . It seems those leaders want to continue down that path to score victory on ballot. When will they be exposed?

    It seems it is easier to go to Hondurus and ask them to stop migration but it is very difficult for these intelligent leaders to come to senses and understand the internal ( western ) origin of the dynamics.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. @geokat62
    As you know, I very much enjoy reading your thoughful posts, Mark. This is just another stellar example. Look forward to the next one.

    Thanx, Geo! Always nice to hear from you as well. -mg

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Clyde says:
    @myself

    there is a group of Americans that enjoy being bigshots and having colonies.
     
    This is an absolutely crucial observation.

    In the 19th century, American elites always looked with envy at the European top-echelon, specifically at the latter being colonial and imperial overlords.

    It was a sign of having proven their worthiness to sit at the top table when, at the end of the 1800s, America's rulers finally acquired overseas colonies, to include Puerto Rico and the Philippines.

    Finally, the non-slave owning white American could play "Pukka Sahib", not with Punjabis, but with native Filipinos, Central Americans and Hawaiians! America had arrived! It must have been a most satisfying feeling - to be the master by sheer dint of Providence and being born American - glorious.

    And now, it's biting us in the *ss. Historical blowback.

    The 19th and 20th century versions of invade the world was fun because there was no inviting. Those whose who lived in Central American banana export nations. etc knew they were meant to stay in place. Not come here. Mexicans knew they must stay in Mexico, NAFTA blew this up.

    The only large exception was Vietnam. We went in there, 55 thousand Americans died. In return we have at least 2 million Vietnamese.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anthony Aaron
    I was in SoCal since '66 -- and even way back then there were millions of illegals from mexico in just San Diego, Orange and LA Counties.

    In the late-'70s, the government stated that, of the 7.5-8 million folks who lived in LA County, more than 2.5 MILLION of them were illegal mexicans … and, like any and all government statistics, was likely far understating the reality of the situation.

    Now we've got more than 60 M I L L I O N hispanics in the United States -- and guess what kind of a shitstorm they're going to make as time goes on.
    , @anon
    The Mexicans are just living in their native land.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Viceroyalty_of_the_New_Spain_1800_(without_Philippines).png
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. @Dagon Shield
    For the longest time, Pat Buchanan has been complaining about the southern 'cesspool' but never ever, has he once said that let's send in the marines to clease it of its white overlords, who are directly responsible for the threat and his ersatz, James Kirkpatrick doesn't say so now. As long as you protect the trash that runs Latin America, there will be no respite from the flood of humanity. Do you have the willingness to go into Mexico to kill your racial kith and kin to save your own backyard from noxious miasma of the non white, illegal immigrants? If not, STFU!

    The putative pugilist is verbalist nonpareil; however, his Roman Catholic upbringing will always put him short of that oomph, found in a Baptist, needed to flush out the toilet on the southern border.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. anon[266] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra
    The discussion between Merkel and Orban of Hungary is quite simple: Orban 'we want to choose ourselves with whom we live together', Merkel 'the foundation of Europe (she hardly ever uses the word EU) is humanism'.
    If humanism includes destroying one's own culture, as far as I know she never was asked.

    Urban of Hungary should try to limit its interaction with US ,France and UK when these 3 countries get excited about imposing sanctions or waging wars by direct and indirect means . It should also limit its role in supporting Saudi ,Israel, or any French initiatives in Niger and Mali or Chad. People affected by the indirect and direct contributions from Orabns’ country have a right to a piece of the land Orban struts along .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. @Stan d Mute

    These salient facts reminds us that America’s liberal wing is behaving badly. Very badly.
     
    I can’t even get through the comments, at #2 and we are batting 1000 (to use a term sportsball fans can understand). So what, who cares what the “liberal wing” is doing? Are America’s “conservatives” doing anything? Liberals are by definition a pack of limp wristed pansies, I bullied them relentlessly in school, the most they ever did was wet their panties and snitch to the teachers. Are they really stopping us from evicting the invaders or putting mines and tanks on the border? If they’re not stopping us, who is?

    Good point. The one defense I will offer on behalf of the GOP concerns political taboos and public perception. Average voters, remember, watch a lot of TV. They don’t read UNZ (unfortunately).

    Thus the racism boogeyman has paralyzed the conservative establishment (GOP, more or less) from doing what it successfully accomplished under Eisenhower (‘Operation Wetback’), which was the speedy and successful deportation of tens of thousands of illegal ‘wetbacks’ (as they were once called) from the American southwest.

    Today’s reigning liberal zeitgeist no longer tolerates that level of white solidarity and white purposefulness. OK, sure, Chamber of Commerce types do like cheap labor. And so also do a lot of the GOP elites.

    But rich, country club conservatives who run the GOP are also aware that the Spanish-speaking wave of illegal underachievers now entering America from below the Rio Grande vote overwhelmingly Democrat. This fact is fully understood.

    So clearly, the GOP–from top to bottom doesn’t–want these gate-crashers (or their offspring) colonizing America. These demographic trends will inevitably marginalize the interests of the GOP’s base as well as its white leadership. It’s a problem that is understood.

    But these so-called conservatives are both worried and scared all the same.

    If they’re identified by (((intellectuals/pundits))) as acting too aggressively on this issue (immigration), they will be tarred as ‘nativist’ or ‘racist’. It’s a bullshit charge but it can be career-ending.

    Like the smear of being tarred an ‘anti-Semite’, charges of (white) racism can spell political death. Recall that fact that even a millionaire movie star (Mel Gibson) was nearly destroyed for crossing a rhetorical ‘red line’ by making private comments that offended the Chosen People. These taboos are real.

    America’s so-called conservative leadership is just too timid to go up against the prevailing zeitgeist which identifies ‘racism’ (including ‘white advocacy’) as a profound moral failing.

    These taboos ultimately serves the Dems, their base, as well as their various (((donors))).

    All these taboos are maintained by various ‘experts’ who dominate (and own) America’s glorious (((mainstream media))). That’s the unpleasant situation. This is why even Pat Buchanan must pull his punches.

    Read More
    • Agree: geokat62
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. @Clyde
    The 19th and 20th century versions of invade the world was fun because there was no inviting. Those whose who lived in Central American banana export nations. etc knew they were meant to stay in place. Not come here. Mexicans knew they must stay in Mexico, NAFTA blew this up.

    The only large exception was Vietnam. We went in there, 55 thousand Americans died. In return we have at least 2 million Vietnamese.

    I was in SoCal since ’66 — and even way back then there were millions of illegals from mexico in just San Diego, Orange and LA Counties.

    In the late-’70s, the government stated that, of the 7.5-8 million folks who lived in LA County, more than 2.5 MILLION of them were illegal mexicans … and, like any and all government statistics, was likely far understating the reality of the situation.

    Now we’ve got more than 60 M I L L I O N hispanics in the United States — and guess what kind of a shitstorm they’re going to make as time goes on.

    Read More
    • Agree: Clyde
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. @Charles Pewitt
    Sam Francis On Anarcho-Tyranny in 2004

    Anarcho-Tyranny—Where Multiculturalism Leads:

    Unwilling to control immigration and the cultural disintegration it causes, the authorities instead control the law-abiding.

     


    This is precisely the bizarre system of misrule I have elsewhere described as "anarcho-tyranny"—we refuse to control real criminals (that`s the anarchy) so we control the innocent (that`s the tyranny).

     


    What is now becoming obvious in Europe...ought to be no less obvious to our own decrepit rulers here.

     


    It`s already obvious to those they rule.

     


    All they need is a leader with the guts and brains to say it out loud.

     

    Mass Immigration Is Anarcho-Tyranny

    Tweet from 2015:

    https://twitter.com/CharlesPewitt/status/576031160062586881

    We’ve been punishing the innocent for more than a century — not wanting to cause some sort of psychological trauma to the guilty.

    We don’t punish thieves — we spend billion$ on electronic and other measures to prevent theft; we don’t punish illegal aliens — we spend billion$ on their SNAP, HUD, EITC, welfare, MEDICAL and other benefits — all of which are paid by US Citizens and Taxpayers; we don’t punish youth for committing crimes in schools — b h o signed an Executive Order demanding ‘equal outcomes’ of criminal reports for blacks, hispanics and whites — even though the blacks and hispanics commit the overwhelming bulk of such crimes — all of which results in situations like Travon Martin and the guy who shot kids in his Florida high school — both of whom should have been in the criminal justice system, but for b h o’s EO.

    Countless other examples exist … but you get my drift.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. The only way international “equality” can be reached is if unlimited mass immigration reduces every country to the lowest common denominator—which may be the whole reason why globalists support it so much.

    It’s even worse than that. Even when we think we have reached the lowest common denominator, failed states will continue exporting people. They truly are the gift that keeps on giving.

    In 1900 the population of the USA was 76 million, and the population of Mexico was 14 million. If every Mexican had moved to the USA, the latter would have had 16% Mexicans. Instead, even though Mexico exported people and the USA imported people from all over the world, the Mexican population has grown much faster than America’s, and it is still exporting people to the USA.

    Somalia is far more dysfunctional than Mexico, and its people have emigrated all over Europe, causing major problems with crime in formerly peaceful countries such as Sweden. Yet Somalia has only 11 million people. The problem for Europe is that Somali women have an average of 5.8 children, and so the emigration will continue without end.

    European migration policy is so badly broken that, paradoxically, Europe would end up with a smaller Somali minority in year 2100 if it were to invite the entire population of Somalia, disperse them around the continent, and put the women on the Pill.

    Even if Western countries decide to refuse “Failure Migration”, people in failed states have another trick up their sleeve: the best way they can provide their children with a prosperous future (in Europe) is to sustain a permanent low-level civil war. Feeble-minded Europeans will be unwilling to send migrants back to a “war zone”.

    Current policies are clearly not sustainable. Idiocracy has already arrived.

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk

    Even if Western countries decide to refuse “Failure Migration”, people in failed states have another trick up their sleeve: the best way they can provide their children with a prosperous future (in Europe) is to sustain a permanent low-level civil war
     
    Wow !
    Those self inflicted shit holes , just so to pique the whitey's conscience eh ?
    nuthin, absolutely nuthin to do with that five years plan to do seven countries ?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw

    Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen —
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. What a stupid “article.”

    The problem with immigration is the rich. The rich–not just rich “liberals,” whatever they are, but all kinds of rich–want immigrants. (Immigrants keep the masses in their proper station. Under the bootheel.) And so we gets immigrants. But that am too hard for you High-IQ-ers to get.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  42. anon[308] • Disclaimer says:
    @Clyde
    The 19th and 20th century versions of invade the world was fun because there was no inviting. Those whose who lived in Central American banana export nations. etc knew they were meant to stay in place. Not come here. Mexicans knew they must stay in Mexico, NAFTA blew this up.

    The only large exception was Vietnam. We went in there, 55 thousand Americans died. In return we have at least 2 million Vietnamese.

    The Mexicans are just living in their native land.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde
    More proof that anyone can lay claim to anything at anytime. Your Spanish colonial conquest map shows this.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. denk says:
    @James N. Kennett

    The only way international “equality” can be reached is if unlimited mass immigration reduces every country to the lowest common denominator—which may be the whole reason why globalists support it so much.
     
    It's even worse than that. Even when we think we have reached the lowest common denominator, failed states will continue exporting people. They truly are the gift that keeps on giving.

    In 1900 the population of the USA was 76 million, and the population of Mexico was 14 million. If every Mexican had moved to the USA, the latter would have had 16% Mexicans. Instead, even though Mexico exported people and the USA imported people from all over the world, the Mexican population has grown much faster than America's, and it is still exporting people to the USA.

    Somalia is far more dysfunctional than Mexico, and its people have emigrated all over Europe, causing major problems with crime in formerly peaceful countries such as Sweden. Yet Somalia has only 11 million people. The problem for Europe is that Somali women have an average of 5.8 children, and so the emigration will continue without end.

    European migration policy is so badly broken that, paradoxically, Europe would end up with a smaller Somali minority in year 2100 if it were to invite the entire population of Somalia, disperse them around the continent, and put the women on the Pill.

    Even if Western countries decide to refuse "Failure Migration", people in failed states have another trick up their sleeve: the best way they can provide their children with a prosperous future (in Europe) is to sustain a permanent low-level civil war. Feeble-minded Europeans will be unwilling to send migrants back to a "war zone".

    Current policies are clearly not sustainable. Idiocracy has already arrived.

    Even if Western countries decide to refuse “Failure Migration”, people in failed states have another trick up their sleeve: the best way they can provide their children with a prosperous future (in Europe) is to sustain a permanent low-level civil war

    Wow !
    Those self inflicted shit holes , just so to pique the whitey’s conscience eh ?
    nuthin, absolutely nuthin to do with that five years plan to do seven countries ?

    Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen —

    Read More
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett

    Those self inflicted shit holes , just so to pique the whitey’s conscience eh ?
    nuthin, absolutely nuthin to do with that five years plan to do seven countries ?

    Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen
     

    The actual hit list in the video is: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran. The mad US plan stalled after the occupation of Iraq became much more difficult than the authors of the memo anticipated. When the Libyan civil war began, the US, UK and France took the opportunity to oppose Gaddafi. The US also fought in Somalia but did not attack the other four countries.

    It is right to say that the countries that start a war have some moral responsibility for refugees, although moving them thousands of miles for a new life in the West is not necessarily the most cost-effective or humane plan. Sweden and Germany are not certainly responsible for any Middle Eastern wars.

    Who is responsible for these wars?

    Iraq: previous war started by USA, UK; recent conflict with ISIS funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar with support from Turkey
    Syria: Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey
    Iran: not at war but still exporting people
    Libya: civil war, with limited airstrikes by US, UK, France
    Somalia: tribal war since time immemorial, but with help a decade ago from the USA
    Sudan: fighting among themselves
    Yemen: Saudi Arabia

    Other people exporters not on your list:
    Morocco: remarkably peaceful but still exports people, including surprising numbers of criminals (shades of Mariel?)
    Eritrea and Ethiopia: fighting among themselves
    Afghanistan: Taliban created by Pakistan's ISI, held in check by the USA and UK
    Bangladesh: not at war
    Pakistan: not at war
    Senegal: peaceful

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. Clyde says:
    @anon
    The Mexicans are just living in their native land.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Viceroyalty_of_the_New_Spain_1800_(without_Philippines).png

    More proof that anyone can lay claim to anything at anytime. Your Spanish colonial conquest map shows this.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. @denk

    Even if Western countries decide to refuse “Failure Migration”, people in failed states have another trick up their sleeve: the best way they can provide their children with a prosperous future (in Europe) is to sustain a permanent low-level civil war
     
    Wow !
    Those self inflicted shit holes , just so to pique the whitey's conscience eh ?
    nuthin, absolutely nuthin to do with that five years plan to do seven countries ?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw

    Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen —

    Those self inflicted shit holes , just so to pique the whitey’s conscience eh ?
    nuthin, absolutely nuthin to do with that five years plan to do seven countries ?

    Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen

    The actual hit list in the video is: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran. The mad US plan stalled after the occupation of Iraq became much more difficult than the authors of the memo anticipated. When the Libyan civil war began, the US, UK and France took the opportunity to oppose Gaddafi. The US also fought in Somalia but did not attack the other four countries.

    It is right to say that the countries that start a war have some moral responsibility for refugees, although moving them thousands of miles for a new life in the West is not necessarily the most cost-effective or humane plan. Sweden and Germany are not certainly responsible for any Middle Eastern wars.

    Who is responsible for these wars?

    Iraq: previous war started by USA, UK; recent conflict with ISIS funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar with support from Turkey
    Syria: Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey
    Iran: not at war but still exporting people
    Libya: civil war, with limited airstrikes by US, UK, France
    Somalia: tribal war since time immemorial, but with help a decade ago from the USA
    Sudan: fighting among themselves
    Yemen: Saudi Arabia

    Other people exporters not on your list:
    Morocco: remarkably peaceful but still exports people, including surprising numbers of criminals (shades of Mariel?)
    Eritrea and Ethiopia: fighting among themselves
    Afghanistan: Taliban created by Pakistan’s ISI, held in check by the USA and UK
    Bangladesh: not at war
    Pakistan: not at war
    Senegal: peaceful

    Read More
    • Replies: @Them Guys
    You forgot to Include Israel's Massive involvement in most of these wars and actions. Trained and gives medical support to ISSIS and AlCIAda and isrsaels constant fly by bomb runs on Syria.

    And too many more to list here.

    Plus the USA & UK both would not be involved if not for AIPAC and various other jew run orgs.

    , @denk
    Trump has banned refugees from ....
    Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen —

    http://hangthebankers.com/trump-bans-refugees-seven-countries-united-states-destroyed/

    Five of them were made failed states by murkkan shock and awe.

    Syria is still on going.
    Its so-called civil war was orchestrated by fukus using foreign imported jihadists mercs/

    Iran might be the next target.

    When the Libyan civil war began, the US, UK and France took the opportunity to oppose Gaddafi
     
    The 'civil war' was another proxy war sponsored by fukus [france, uk, us], another regime change project right from the start.

    Iraq: previous war started by USA, UK; recent conflict with ISIS funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar with support from Turkey
     
    Iraq had already been made a failed state by the first/second fukus perpetrated gulf wars. Saudi, Qatar, Turkey are nuthin but proxies led from afar in Washington.
    ISIS another fukus created proxy mercs, just like AQ, Boko Harm, Abu Sayyaf.......

    Sudan: fighting among themselves
     
    Sudan was balkanised into North/south by fukus, current 'civil war' in South Sudan is also made in USA...playing both sides.

    Target.......China.

    'If one asks the question “who benefits from the South Sudanese civil war?” the answer is clear. The USA is presently the ONLY beneficiary of the ongoing horrors in South Sudan for this latest round of conflict has once again shut down the Chinese run oil fields in the country.

    The USA has determined that its in its “national interests” to deprive China of access to Africa’s oil fields and has succeeded in its goal of again shutting down Chinese oil production in Sudan, the only majority Chinese owned oil field in Africa.

    What other evidence links the USA to the South Sudanese civil war? Thanks to Wikileaks we know that the USA via the CIA has been paying the salaries of the South Sudanese Army (SPLA) since 2009. In other words, both the soldiers (“rebels”) supporting Riek Machar and the soldier supporting President Salva Kiir are being paid by the USA, paid to kill each other?

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2014/01/23/the-usa-v-china-in-south-sudan/'

    Yemen: Saudi Arabia
     
    Another proxy war led from behind by uncle sham, there's a full blown genocide going on that make Fallujah looks like kindergarten stuff.

    Afghanistan: Taliban created by Pakistan’s ISI, held in check by the USA and UK
     
    Jeeze.
    By now its common knowledge that Taliban /Bin laden were all CIA assets created to fight the USSR

    The 2001 Invasion was justified by another false pretext of fighting terrorism.
    Real reasons were to put murkkan boots in China/Russia's backyard.

    Pakistan: not at war
     
    Has been ravished for years by fukusIndia sponsored TTP terrorism and Baloch separatists.

    Eritrea and Ethiopia: fighting among themselves
     
    Another uncle sham's proxy war using its Ethiopia cat paw ...

    Really, it'd be hard put to find any war/conflict in the world thats's free from fukus complicity !


    https://www.globalresearch.ca/u-s-sets-stage-for-libya-like-regime-change-in-eritrea-africas-cuba-2/5531735
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. Them Guys says:
    @James N. Kennett

    Those self inflicted shit holes , just so to pique the whitey’s conscience eh ?
    nuthin, absolutely nuthin to do with that five years plan to do seven countries ?

    Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen
     

    The actual hit list in the video is: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran. The mad US plan stalled after the occupation of Iraq became much more difficult than the authors of the memo anticipated. When the Libyan civil war began, the US, UK and France took the opportunity to oppose Gaddafi. The US also fought in Somalia but did not attack the other four countries.

    It is right to say that the countries that start a war have some moral responsibility for refugees, although moving them thousands of miles for a new life in the West is not necessarily the most cost-effective or humane plan. Sweden and Germany are not certainly responsible for any Middle Eastern wars.

    Who is responsible for these wars?

    Iraq: previous war started by USA, UK; recent conflict with ISIS funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar with support from Turkey
    Syria: Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey
    Iran: not at war but still exporting people
    Libya: civil war, with limited airstrikes by US, UK, France
    Somalia: tribal war since time immemorial, but with help a decade ago from the USA
    Sudan: fighting among themselves
    Yemen: Saudi Arabia

    Other people exporters not on your list:
    Morocco: remarkably peaceful but still exports people, including surprising numbers of criminals (shades of Mariel?)
    Eritrea and Ethiopia: fighting among themselves
    Afghanistan: Taliban created by Pakistan's ISI, held in check by the USA and UK
    Bangladesh: not at war
    Pakistan: not at war
    Senegal: peaceful

    You forgot to Include Israel’s Massive involvement in most of these wars and actions. Trained and gives medical support to ISSIS and AlCIAda and isrsaels constant fly by bomb runs on Syria.

    And too many more to list here.

    Plus the USA & UK both would not be involved if not for AIPAC and various other jew run orgs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk
    I understand that The Israel lobby wielded huge influence in murkka's ME policies.
    In the world at large tho, especially in Asia Pac [1] murkka is run by the Zbig clique who espouse the Mackinder heartland theory....controlling. , suppressing of peer competitors China/Russia .

    Following this track, fukus have been stalking and sabotaging Chinese foreign investments via covert/overt wars all over the world.

    'If conflict with China is inevitable, it makes sense to have U.S. bases in Afghanistan, Kyrgyzstan, Iraq and maybe Iran and Syria. If China is dependent on Middle East oil, it makes sense for the U.S. to be able to control how and where it flows from the Caspian Sea and Persian Gulf oil fields. It makes sense to cultivate an alliance with India, risking the accusation of nuclear hypocrisy in doing so. It makes sense to ratchet up tensions on the Korean Peninsula, by linking North Korea to Iran and Iraq, calling it ?evil,? dismissing South Korea?s ?sunshine diplomacy? efforts and encouraging Japan to take a hard line towards Pyongyang. It makes sense to get Tokyo to declare, for the first time, that the security of the Taiwan Straights is of common concern to it and Washington. It makes sense to regain a strategic toehold in the Philippines, in the name of the War on Terror, and to vilify the growing Filipino Maoist movement'

    http://dissidentvoice.org/Apr06/Leupp20.htm

    p.s.
    Sinophobia is not limited to the ruling class, its deeply ingrained at the glass root level.
    For reason best known to themselves,
    WTS [white trash supremacists] are inherently sinophobes.


    Read the comments in this thread.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-06/leaked-chinese-memo-warns-thucydides-trap-us-war-unavoidable
    [tip of an iceberg]

    UNZ has its fair share of WTS sinophobes, led by antilahun, GT, and many others...another one here is stan d mute.
    Even those supposedly anti imperialist like Can Speccy isnt immune .
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. @Randy the Auditor

    If “fleeing violence” qualifies one for “asylum,” every Latin American in the world qualifies for entry into the United States.
     
    Not to mention every African.

    There are about one billion Sub-Saharan Africans and there are at least four hundred thousand people living south of the USA. The projections are that Sub-Saharan Africa will be at two billion in the next 20 or 30 years . A truly frightening thought in a Democracy.

    Even if ten percent of them come to the USA it would be a very crowded country.

    It would be the end of European people ruling the USA.

    In my ward which has been redistricted a number of years ago the so called Hispanics are now 65% of the population of the ward and of course the Hispanics rule.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. CAC says:

    The USA founded in the 18th Century does not exist in our time. All else aside, the 1965 Immigration Act was the final straw, so to speak. The low-IQ, never-wanted-to-be-American “immigrants” were not the principal problems; their children, and now grand-children, are. For well over fifty years the USA has been importing people who hate us passionately and fervently, and their children and g-children, technically “Americans”, are now using our own laws to destroy the country from the inside. It would certainly be possible to re-christen this country as it was founded. Doing so without a great deal bloodshed and heartache, however, is not.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  49. denk says:
    @James N. Kennett

    Those self inflicted shit holes , just so to pique the whitey’s conscience eh ?
    nuthin, absolutely nuthin to do with that five years plan to do seven countries ?

    Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen
     

    The actual hit list in the video is: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran. The mad US plan stalled after the occupation of Iraq became much more difficult than the authors of the memo anticipated. When the Libyan civil war began, the US, UK and France took the opportunity to oppose Gaddafi. The US also fought in Somalia but did not attack the other four countries.

    It is right to say that the countries that start a war have some moral responsibility for refugees, although moving them thousands of miles for a new life in the West is not necessarily the most cost-effective or humane plan. Sweden and Germany are not certainly responsible for any Middle Eastern wars.

    Who is responsible for these wars?

    Iraq: previous war started by USA, UK; recent conflict with ISIS funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar with support from Turkey
    Syria: Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey
    Iran: not at war but still exporting people
    Libya: civil war, with limited airstrikes by US, UK, France
    Somalia: tribal war since time immemorial, but with help a decade ago from the USA
    Sudan: fighting among themselves
    Yemen: Saudi Arabia

    Other people exporters not on your list:
    Morocco: remarkably peaceful but still exports people, including surprising numbers of criminals (shades of Mariel?)
    Eritrea and Ethiopia: fighting among themselves
    Afghanistan: Taliban created by Pakistan's ISI, held in check by the USA and UK
    Bangladesh: not at war
    Pakistan: not at war
    Senegal: peaceful

    Trump has banned refugees from ….
    Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen —

    http://hangthebankers.com/trump-bans-refugees-seven-countries-united-states-destroyed/

    Five of them were made failed states by murkkan shock and awe.

    Syria is still on going.
    Its so-called civil war was orchestrated by fukus using foreign imported jihadists mercs/

    Iran might be the next target.

    When the Libyan civil war began, the US, UK and France took the opportunity to oppose Gaddafi

    The ‘civil war’ was another proxy war sponsored by fukus [france, uk, us], another regime change project right from the start.

    Iraq: previous war started by USA, UK; recent conflict with ISIS funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar with support from Turkey

    Iraq had already been made a failed state by the first/second fukus perpetrated gulf wars. Saudi, Qatar, Turkey are nuthin but proxies led from afar in Washington.
    ISIS another fukus created proxy mercs, just like AQ, Boko Harm, Abu Sayyaf…….

    Sudan: fighting among themselves

    Sudan was balkanised into North/south by fukus, current ‘civil war’ in South Sudan is also made in USA…playing both sides.

    Target…….China.

    ‘If one asks the question “who benefits from the South Sudanese civil war?” the answer is clear. The USA is presently the ONLY beneficiary of the ongoing horrors in South Sudan for this latest round of conflict has once again shut down the Chinese run oil fields in the country.

    The USA has determined that its in its “national interests” to deprive China of access to Africa’s oil fields and has succeeded in its goal of again shutting down Chinese oil production in Sudan, the only majority Chinese owned oil field in Africa.

    What other evidence links the USA to the South Sudanese civil war? Thanks to Wikileaks we know that the USA via the CIA has been paying the salaries of the South Sudanese Army (SPLA) since 2009. In other words, both the soldiers (“rebels”) supporting Riek Machar and the soldier supporting President Salva Kiir are being paid by the USA, paid to kill each other?

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2014/01/23/the-usa-v-china-in-south-sudan/’

    Yemen: Saudi Arabia

    Another proxy war led from behind by uncle sham, there’s a full blown genocide going on that make Fallujah looks like kindergarten stuff.

    Afghanistan: Taliban created by Pakistan’s ISI, held in check by the USA and UK

    Jeeze.
    By now its common knowledge that Taliban /Bin laden were all CIA assets created to fight the USSR

    The 2001 Invasion was justified by another false pretext of fighting terrorism.
    Real reasons were to put murkkan boots in China/Russia’s backyard.

    Pakistan: not at war

    Has been ravished for years by fukusIndia sponsored TTP terrorism and Baloch separatists.

    Eritrea and Ethiopia: fighting among themselves

    Another uncle sham’s proxy war using its Ethiopia cat paw …

    Really, it’d be hard put to find any war/conflict in the world thats’s free from fukus complicity !

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/u-s-sets-stage-for-libya-like-regime-change-in-eritrea-africas-cuba-2/5531735

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. AndrewR says:
    @Medvedev
    Our main problem is millions of self-hating liberals and Jews who hate and resent White America.
    With sane laws and policies and without anti-American pc hysteria it would be very easy to protect our borders:
    - build the wall;
    - enforce the law of the land;
    - kick off 'infiltrators'.

    Well, they’re part of the problem, but calling them the “main problem” ignores power structures. The anti-white academics and activists are useful idiots of insatiable global capitalists to whom borders are an intolerable inconvenience.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. AndrewR says:
    @Stan d Mute

    These salient facts reminds us that America’s liberal wing is behaving badly. Very badly.
     
    I can’t even get through the comments, at #2 and we are batting 1000 (to use a term sportsball fans can understand). So what, who cares what the “liberal wing” is doing? Are America’s “conservatives” doing anything? Liberals are by definition a pack of limp wristed pansies, I bullied them relentlessly in school, the most they ever did was wet their panties and snitch to the teachers. Are they really stopping us from evicting the invaders or putting mines and tanks on the border? If they’re not stopping us, who is?

    We appreciate you identifying yourself as an unrepentant bully.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. denk says:
    @Them Guys
    You forgot to Include Israel's Massive involvement in most of these wars and actions. Trained and gives medical support to ISSIS and AlCIAda and isrsaels constant fly by bomb runs on Syria.

    And too many more to list here.

    Plus the USA & UK both would not be involved if not for AIPAC and various other jew run orgs.

    I understand that The Israel lobby wielded huge influence in murkka’s ME policies.
    In the world at large tho, especially in Asia Pac [1] murkka is run by the Zbig clique who espouse the Mackinder heartland theory….controlling. , suppressing of peer competitors China/Russia .

    Following this track, fukus have been stalking and sabotaging Chinese foreign investments via covert/overt wars all over the world.

    ‘If conflict with China is inevitable, it makes sense to have U.S. bases in Afghanistan, Kyrgyzstan, Iraq and maybe Iran and Syria. If China is dependent on Middle East oil, it makes sense for the U.S. to be able to control how and where it flows from the Caspian Sea and Persian Gulf oil fields. It makes sense to cultivate an alliance with India, risking the accusation of nuclear hypocrisy in doing so. It makes sense to ratchet up tensions on the Korean Peninsula, by linking North Korea to Iran and Iraq, calling it ?evil,? dismissing South Korea?s ?sunshine diplomacy? efforts and encouraging Japan to take a hard line towards Pyongyang. It makes sense to get Tokyo to declare, for the first time, that the security of the Taiwan Straights is of common concern to it and Washington. It makes sense to regain a strategic toehold in the Philippines, in the name of the War on Terror, and to vilify the growing Filipino Maoist movement’

    http://dissidentvoice.org/Apr06/Leupp20.htm

    p.s.
    Sinophobia is not limited to the ruling class, its deeply ingrained at the glass root level.
    For reason best known to themselves,
    WTS [white trash supremacists] are inherently sinophobes.

    Read the comments in this thread.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-06/leaked-chinese-memo-warns-thucydides-trap-us-war-unavoidable

    [tip of an iceberg]

    UNZ has its fair share of WTS sinophobes, led by antilahun, GT, and many others…another one here is stan d mute.
    Even those supposedly anti imperialist like Can Speccy isnt immune .

    Read More
    • Agree: Them Guys
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. EagleEye says:
    @Stan d Mute
    Blah, blah, blah.. Boring!

    Americans are too busy watching the Lardassians on TV or cheering their favorite sportsball team of illiterate criminal Africans to worry about unimportant crap like facts or the disappearance of their genome. “Lookie there! One of them Lardassians cut off his pecker and put on a dress. And Tyrone done ran fast with the sportsball! Gimme the clicker, Rachel Madcow is about to come on the teevee...”

    We truly deserve what is happening to us. That’s the worst fact of all. Our ENTIRE culture is rotten to the maggot infested core. Even hardcore 2A 3%ers drool on their guts watching sportsball and proudly wear the names of African sportsballers on their backs. They claim to oppose third world invasion while stuffing their third chins with greasy nachos. Even when their sons are murdered and their daughters raped, they do nothing. Then they blame “the joos”...

    Could not have said it better myself, bravo. But a couple of comments ……not sure about how many of these Latin American countries have been cohearsed and strong armed for decades in order for the American elite to fleece them. Not mentioned in this article. A great many of these people have been marginalized by Americas incessant meddling in their affairs. abetted of course by the local ruling elite. And often with extreme violence. Just like in the Middle East, everywhere America puts its finger there is ensuing chaos and misery….hence the massive flight to escape. They bring their hatred with them, anyone blame them?
    I think the writer correct on many points however . I have a huge beef with the double standard of most of the countries that profit from immigration to the US. First Mexico…I have lived there for going on 32 years. I was married at one point to a Mexican. I have the standard FM2 document that allows me to enter. For the last 10 years I have worked outside of Mexico and have not stayed put inside for a complete 2 years, the requirement for me to get a passport. Now, I have my principal residence in Mexico for 32 years, I have a business with employees and I own properties. For those first 22 years I did not stay out as I have lately…still they will not give me a passport. I speak and write fluent Spanish and have many Mexican “friends” and business connections. I deal in Fine Art and at some time or another have had dealings all the way up to the presidency in past administrations. I could be a consultant on anything Mexican……have been robbed at gunpoint and had employees beat up and robbed. I know the people. One thing that I can tell you , it is embedded in the psyche of each and every Mexican alive to one day repossess the parts of the US that was stolen from them and have revenge for the many arrogant and humiliating transgressions perpetrated against them. I honestly cannot blame them for that but each time I see a married couple purposely fly to Houston or San Diego and check into a hospital to have their new baby born and automatically be given a US passport…..it pisses me off.
    Now there is another country that I also have intimate knowledge of and that is Turkey and for lack of time I will not give examples but it is worse than Mexico ……..When I saw Erdogan’s henchmen bloodying some people in Washington and pushing his disgusting weight around at Mohammad Ali’s funeral I was really PISSED. And the good ole’ USofA? Bombing half the world and fleecing it’s own massively ignorant and downright stupid population ……..I have not lived there in 32 years, I speak 2 foreign languages and a little of a third……..no plan to go back to watch the fireworks. There are some good points here that I agree about in this immigration issue…..but the fault lies with America. It is beyond the time when it can right itself in a practical way……..ignorance at this point is not an excuse.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mark green
    Thank you for the interesting and insightful comment. And I think that we can agree on this: political trends point to increased tension and more conflict ahead.

    Immediate objective: illegal immigration into the US must be halted. Zio-Washington must be contained.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. @EagleEye
    Could not have said it better myself, bravo. But a couple of comments ......not sure about how many of these Latin American countries have been cohearsed and strong armed for decades in order for the American elite to fleece them. Not mentioned in this article. A great many of these people have been marginalized by Americas incessant meddling in their affairs. abetted of course by the local ruling elite. And often with extreme violence. Just like in the Middle East, everywhere America puts its finger there is ensuing chaos and misery....hence the massive flight to escape. They bring their hatred with them, anyone blame them?
    I think the writer correct on many points however . I have a huge beef with the double standard of most of the countries that profit from immigration to the US. First Mexico...I have lived there for going on 32 years. I was married at one point to a Mexican. I have the standard FM2 document that allows me to enter. For the last 10 years I have worked outside of Mexico and have not stayed put inside for a complete 2 years, the requirement for me to get a passport. Now, I have my principal residence in Mexico for 32 years, I have a business with employees and I own properties. For those first 22 years I did not stay out as I have lately...still they will not give me a passport. I speak and write fluent Spanish and have many Mexican "friends" and business connections. I deal in Fine Art and at some time or another have had dealings all the way up to the presidency in past administrations. I could be a consultant on anything Mexican......have been robbed at gunpoint and had employees beat up and robbed. I know the people. One thing that I can tell you , it is embedded in the psyche of each and every Mexican alive to one day repossess the parts of the US that was stolen from them and have revenge for the many arrogant and humiliating transgressions perpetrated against them. I honestly cannot blame them for that but each time I see a married couple purposely fly to Houston or San Diego and check into a hospital to have their new baby born and automatically be given a US passport.....it pisses me off.
    Now there is another country that I also have intimate knowledge of and that is Turkey and for lack of time I will not give examples but it is worse than Mexico ........When I saw Erdogan's henchmen bloodying some people in Washington and pushing his disgusting weight around at Mohammad Ali's funeral I was really PISSED. And the good ole' USofA? Bombing half the world and fleecing it's own massively ignorant and downright stupid population ........I have not lived there in 32 years, I speak 2 foreign languages and a little of a third........no plan to go back to watch the fireworks. There are some good points here that I agree about in this immigration issue.....but the fault lies with America. It is beyond the time when it can right itself in a practical way........ignorance at this point is not an excuse.

    Thank you for the interesting and insightful comment. And I think that we can agree on this: political trends point to increased tension and more conflict ahead.

    Immediate objective: illegal immigration into the US must be halted. Zio-Washington must be contained.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. artichoke says:

    It is indeed too late to cut PR loose, as those people do have citizenship and would game any strategy we might try. Best to admit we’ll have to absorb them on the mainland, post-hurricanes. Low human capital and resentful, but so it goes, we can’t stop it anyway.

    But don’t “cut it loose”! It’s fantastic real estate. Once the inhabitants fail to rebuild and give up and move here, there’s a tropical paradise awaiting gentrification. With a world class port on the south shore. And WE CONTROL ALL SHIPPING THERE due to the Jones Act. A priceless, irreplaceable foothold in the Caribbean, formerly heavily populated because it is so temperate.

    As Trump says, first the bankruptcy must be cleared, and that will mean new, less socialist government will be mandated. Capitalists won’t take it on without some guarantees.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  56. Jordi says:
    @Medvedev
    Our main problem is millions of self-hating liberals and Jews who hate and resent White America.
    With sane laws and policies and without anti-American pc hysteria it would be very easy to protect our borders:
    - build the wall;
    - enforce the law of the land;
    - kick off 'infiltrators'.

    Good read.

    Solutions exist, and should be sought. They would include a 20years moratorium on all immigration . America has a huge deficit, and needs money. How about a 20% tax on overseas money transfers ?

    Remittances are a drag on America’s wealth, no reason to allow the fleecing to continue. Make America Rich Again !

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.