The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 K.R. Bolton Archive
Review: A FAIR HEARING
The Alt-Right in the Words of its Members and Leaders
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Richard Spencer speaking at a public gathering in 2016. Credit: Vas Panagiotopoulos, CC BY 2.0
Richard Spencer speaking at a public gathering in 2016. Credit: Vas Panagiotopoulos, CC BY 2.0

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

A Fair Hearing: The Alt-Right in the Words of its Members and Leaders, edited by George T. Shaw,
Arktos Media Ltd., 2018

ORDER IT NOW

The Alt-Right became a part of the US political lexicon during the Trump-Clinton presidential campaigns, when Clinton, like Obama and Trotsky, wanted to appear as the people’s champion rather than the oligarch’s choice. Looking about for a red-herring, a bogeyman and a scapegoat she – or her scriptwriters –chose the Alt-Right, a hitherto obscure, broad movement that could be depicted as a neo-Nazi or revived Klan threat because its agenda included white survival. Because Alt-Right pioneers were well-educated, articulate and presentable, and had their foundations prepared by the traditional Old Right that had become marginalized partly by the mainstreaming of the misnamed “neoconservatives,” there had been a fertilized ground from which the Alt-Right grew, rather than just cropping up from nowhere. These origins are often obscure in stating that the Alt-Right, as in Europe, is a New Right. It is actually, as Daniel Friberg, CEO of Arktos Media has stated in his own book “the return of the ‘real right’.” (Friberg, The Real Right Returns, Arktos Media Ltd., 2015). The “Right” does not need reinventing, it needs reiterating. What was called “Right,” especially in the Anglophone states, is a reanimation of Liberal-Whiggery that subverted and obscured the traditional Right. The Right is organic, Liberal-Whiggery and Communism alike disrupt organic bonds, the former with the fracture of individualism, the latter with the fracture of class, and both with the primacy of economics. Hence one now sees the revival of interest of Rightist philosophers such as Oswald Spengler and Julius Evola among the Alt-Right.

The interregnum between the traditional Right, which Dr. Paul Gottfried termed “palaeoconservative” to distinguish it from the bastardous misnomer, the “neoconservatives,” was maintained by certain traditional-Conservatives such as Pat Buchanan, Joe Sobran, Sam Dixon, Jared Taylor, et al. The two latter are included in this anthology of Alt-Right activists and writers. The inclusion of a chapter from Dr. Gottfried would have perhaps been apt given that Dr. Kevin MacDonald’s expertise on Jewish matters as they pertain to Western culture, are included, and Dr. Gottfried is an example of a Jew whose sincerity and contribution to the Right (whether called “palaeo,” “true,” real” or “Old”) might only be questioned by the most obsessive Judaeophobes of which the Right, Old, Alt and New, has many, as distinct from a justified and rational “Counter-Semitism,” defined in George T. Shaw’s “Alt-Right Counterrevolutionary Lexicon” as “suspicion of or distaste for Jewish behaviors and agendas as a response to initiatory hostile actions from Jews.”

The Clinton-Psychotic alliance was trumped because Americans en masse saw Hilary as obnoxious, arrogant, and distant. She needed a scapegoat for her loss; or more than one, when we consider Russia’s alleged but elusive “interference in the US elections,” never mind that a vast network called “civil society” and mainly US based stretches over the world, and regards Russia as the primary target. (K R Bolton, Russia’s Fight against Globalisation, Black House Publishing, 2018).

The editor, George T Shaw, introduces this collection of essays with his chapter “An Alternative to Failure.” His immediate definition of Alt-Right is that of race survival for whites like any other distinct human population. This primary moral imperative of the Alt-Right is expressed as ethnostates, to which everyone is entitled. The Alt-Right as a US phenomenon is of course predicated on the American experience. Race separatism is long part of that heritage, and Sam Dixon, a Southern lawyer who bridges the time-factor between the Old Right and Alt-Right, is cited by Mr Shaw, who writes that “the actual spiritual and philosophical struggle that has been taking place in America since World War II… has been racial.” Shaw lists three fundamental, interrelated concerns of the Alt-Right: demographic destiny, the Jewish question, and white genocide. (Shaw, A Fair Hearing, xi, xii). The “mainstream right” has been inadequate in dealing with these questions, or really one big question; but a new generation has awoken to find demonized what were only a few generations ago normal values.

Gregory Hood’s “The New Kulaks: Whites as an Enemy Class,” examines this demonization and marginalization of whites per se, as a “social construct”
based on privilege and exploitation of “people of color,” without any other identity, in contrast to all others, whose identity assumes profound significance. (Hood, A Fair Hearing, p. 3). Such blind hatred leads to irrational claims such as the notion of “white privilege,” and “white” itself becomes an “insult.” One might note that like “identity politics” for “people of color,” the appendage of “white privilege” was unknown to the Left until recently. Friedrich Engels, in writing of the poor of Britain, did not see anything of “white privilege.” And to conclude that the White working class has tagged along with the oligarchy, or that the oligarchy has any loyalties other than to money, is typical of the way the Left has historically served the interests of money, as Spengler pointed out in The Decline of the West , Prussianism and Socialism and The Hour of Decision, decades ago.

So pervasive is the obliteration of “whiteness” that even when a supposedly “conservative” columnist, Brendan O’Neill, argues in The Spectator that the term “white men” has become “the most dehumanizing insult of our times,” he explains that he does not want to be called a “white man,” as he searches for an identity that includes those of different “color or gender.” (Hood, A Fair Hearing, p. 5). Mr O’Neil began with the Revolutionary Communist Party in Britain and shifted to become a libertarian, as many Communists did. He writes also for the American Conservative, and some of it is quite good. Ultimately libertarianism is not “Right” as “race” is a collective entity, prompting Ayn Rand to call “racism” the “lowest form of collectivism.” (Rand, “Racism,” 1963, https://ari.aynrand.org/issues/culture-and-society/more/Racism). Hood continues that “white identity” is conceded only so far as there is “white privilege.” Hood sees this as paralleling the Stalinist demonization of the “kulaks” as the exploitative wealthy farmers who required eliminating as “class enemies.” “White privilege” inexorably leads to “white supremacy” and to genocide, according to this line. Hence, even the most gutless mob action of Antifa, and the cry of “no platform of Nazis,” can be rationalized as a purely defensive measure for the good of humanity. “Deconstructing a group’s identity as entirely negative is a precursor to politically, economically, and physically destroying that group.” (Hood, p. 8).

One might also ask, when the class warriors of the Left cry that “white racism is divisive,” and has no place in a plural, democratic society, as per the present brouhaha about letting Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux into Australia, Britain, and New Zealand, to speak about multiculturalism, what exactly is “class struggle” if not divisive? Indeed, what is multiculturalism if not intrinsically divisive, when the name itself refers to a multiplicity of cultures within a given ecological niche, where in any other niche one would expect conflict over resources? Such awkwardness is answered with doublespeak phrases such as “unity in diversity.” The Left, having also jumped onto the ecological bandwagon in recent decades, despite their ideological foundation being that forces of social production transcend nature, now claim that mankind must be part of the eco-system, like any other species. However, when it comes to intra-species competition within an eco-system, the Left revert to their 19th century theories about social production and mankind suddenly rises about nature Faustian style.

In “A Normie’s Guide to the Alt-Right” Colin Liddell states that the Alt-Right rejects the simplistic dichotomy of Republicans vs. Democrats; Conservatives vs. Liberals. Before Trump the two parties were indistinguishable. The Alt-Right exists to challenge Leftist globalism, states Mr Liddell. The basic assumptions of this Leftist globalism are not challenged by Conservatives. (Liddell, A Fair Hearing, pp. 17-18). Whether this really can be called “Conservativism” is debatable. Paul Gottfried coined the term palaeoconservative to distinguish the Right from the neocons, whose legacy is not any in sense from the “Right” but from Wilsonian internationalism, and the Trotskyites and other Marxists who went en masse over to the U.S. side during the Cold War, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) being a continuing legacy of this. Such was the exodus of Trotskyites that even Natalia Sedova, in keeping with the judas legacy of her husband, resigned from the Fourth International over the issue of the Korean War, regarding the USSR rather than the USA as the greater threat to world socialism, (Natalia Sedova, 1951, https://www.marxists.org/archive/sedova-natalia/1951/05/09.htm ) which indeed it was, as Trotsky had lamented in The Revolution Betrayed. From the start of Trotsky’s ouster from the Soviet state, Trotskyites, Mensheviks and Social Democrats poured in multitudes into the ranks of the anti-Soviet cause, and later the CIA and its front the Congress for Cultural Freedom, in what has become known as the “cultural Cold War.” Marxists such as Dr Sidney Hook and Carl Gershman became celebrated U.S. “cold warriors,” the NED, whose chief target remains Russia, was established by Trotskyites to pull down the Soviet bloc. This is the legacy of what is often misnamed “conservativism” in the USA, but which continues to coin typically Trotskyite sounding terms such as “Islamo-fascism,” and sees the USA as the herald of a “world revolution,” where once it was – briefly – the USSR. They talk of a “revolutionary mission” in the same manner as the old Trotskyites spoke, and this is called “conservativism.”

With Sam Dickson we approach a veteran who spans the generations of the Right, with 55 years involvement. Indeed, his chapter is aptly called “From Generation to Generation.” Mr Dickson identifies the election of Franklin Roosevelt as an epochal event (Dickson, A Fair Hearing, p. 24). Mr Dickson states that the nationalist wave represented by the America First movement erred in folding up, to “patriotically” support the war effort, on the assumption that after the war, and with the return of a mass of veterans, the movement could be resumed. (Dickson, p. 25). The wartime propaganda did not cease with the end of the war, but continued apace (Dickson, p. 26). It can be added that the Leftward surge was greatly assisted by lifting en masse the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory, the Jewish-Freudian-Marxist refugees from Fascism, to the USA, where they became ensconced throughout academia, courtesy of Rockefeller sponsorship. This emigration was to have far more significant and enduring ramifications than the Anglo-U.S. sponsorship of Trotsky’s return from New York to Russia in 1917. The latter was ousted in short order; the former never were and their influence endures. The Cold War, as mentioned previously, provided an impetus for Trotskyites and Social Democrats, who entered the ranks of conservativism courtesy of the anti-Soviet preoccupation of the Right. The Right because of its intrinsic anti-Marxism was readily co-opted by the Establishment and rendered harmless. Here we resume Dickson’s narrative with his allusion to the founding of National Review in 1955 by William F. Buckley. This was safe conservativism, embracing Wilsonian interventionism, and discarding whatever might have remained of the America First ideology. As Mr Dickson states, the American Right conformed to the platitudes of the present, agonized over “godless Communism” in Korea and Vietnam, while the USA was “colonized by racial aliens.” (Dickson, A Fair Hearing, pp. 26-27). When Natalia Sedova Trotsky broke with the Fourth International, publicly stating that it was the USSR and its allies that represent the greatest bulwark against the world revolution, the Right could have learnt something from that, but apart from Francis Parker Yockey and his several mentors, the periodical Common Sense, TRUD, and the eccentric National Renaissance Party, few did. Mr Dickson states that the “‘Red Menace’” was a critical factor in the misdirection of a whole generation of European Americans…” “Fighting communism,” states Dickson, was a comfortable distraction,” and prevented the cultivation of “race loyalists.” (Dickson, p. 27). This is precisely what Yockey, TRUD and Common Sense were trying to say at the time, and they regarded much of the U.S. Right as a sham and a con.

It was a “controlled opposition,” including The John Birch Society, which the media and the Kennedy Administration turned into a looming menace, and a witch-hunt against nationalist officers such as General Edwin Walker, (who later led the fight against school de-segregation) proceeded in the aftermath of Senator McCarthy’s aborted crusade against Communist subversion. Opposition to the USSR was the Establishment line. This was different from opposition to domestic Marxism, which had the potential for seeding a genuine nationalist rebellion on American soil. Hence the real Right was stunted and diverted, General MacArthur was sacked, as was General Walker (who was put into a lunatic asylum) and Senator McCarthy was driven to his death. Although Mr Dickson does not allude to those details, he does allude to the marginalization of “race loyalists” from this era. The John Birch Society played its part as well, condemning “race loyalty” as serving the “Communist conspiracy.” There were however, significant pockets of resistance, and Mr Dickson mentions The Putnam Letters Committee founded by Princeton graduate and Northerner Carleton Putnam, who infused the segregation fight with scientific arguments, with bestselling books The Reality of Race, and Race and Reason. Others of significance in keeping the Right alive were Willis Carto’s Liberty Lobby and Spotlight, and Wilmot Robertson’s Instauration magazine and his well-documented book The Dispossessed Majority (Dickson, p. 32) during the 1970s, which provided an intellectual foundation. During the 1990s “transition figures” appeared, primarily Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, and the columnist Sam Francis.

Reaching the present, Mr Dickson sees the new generation of the Alt-Right as a spontaneous phenomenon. The existential crisis that defined the generation of the 1960s, albeit a crisis and reaction created and controlled by the “Establishment,” has assumed other forms outside of Establishment control, among another generation that sees the bankruptcy and failure of liberalism. Mr Dickson sees the ideological foundations more akin to that of the Right of the interwar era than the post-1945 era. It is this Right that has a metaphysical quality that appeals to real idealism, and that is not only a rejection and a reaction, but a transcendence.

Evan McLaren, executive director of the National Policy Institute, analyzes “Ground Zero at Charlottesville.” He points out that NPI was not an organizer of this “Unite the Right” event, but that Richard Spencer was an invited speaker. What was clearly a set-up in which the police were used to ensure that the event would not proceed peaceably, and that participants would be required to confront the Left, was used as justification to close the event, in the interests of public order. Many, including those on the Right, have called the event a major tactical mistake, a defeat that has damaged the Alt-Right label beyond repair. Evan remains optimistic.

To what extent should the Right acquiesce to Establishment miscreance, media lies, and Leftist hysteria? President Trump had it near right when he said there were decent people on both sides, near right, because the assumption that there might be decent people on the Left is one that has not been demonstrated. The other option is to claim that any public action by the Right will be a provocation and should not proceed in case the “normies” get a bad impression. There have been many such confrontations between the Left and Trump supporters. The masses who support their President are necessarily aware that the submen causing the violence against them are the same as those at Charlottesville. What’s more, if the catalyst for the rally, to oppose the dismantling of monuments to the Southern heritage, is not a reasonable and legitimate aim, then nothing the Right attempts ever will be; and of course that is precisely the situation: whatever the Right does or does not do, and however it is framed, will still be demonized. The death of Heather Heyer could not have been foreseen, regardless of how the rally was planned. Miss Heyer chose to participate with a violent and gutless mob against the Right, and somehow died while a young man was attempting to leave the area in his automobile whilst pursued by elements of that mob. In Britain, during the 1970s Blair Peach, part of a Trotskyite mob, was similarly martyrized, when he died while rioting against the police, in a protest with overtly violent intent, against a lawful National Front march. He has a school named in his honor.

Hungarian-American writer, You Tuber, Arktos Media editor and wife and mother Melissa Mészáros in “Lessons from Homeless Feminists” considers the adverse impact feminist ideology has had on women, contrasting the modern woman with her hard drinking, straight-talking, fun-filled Hungarian Great-Grandma. Like other versions of the Left, feminism is a mental aberration, and Miss Mészáros provides examples of its misandric obsessions.

In any other context such misandry would be called “hate,” but the traditional “patriarchy” is apparently an obstacle, like everything traditional, to the oligarchy, regardless of its own male-dominated hierarchy. In this instance, feminism serves to fully integrate women into the economy, analogous to the manner by which early Bolshevism sought to fully integrate women into the labor force by attempting to abolish parenthood. Feminism, like the rest of the New Left, would not have gained traction without sponsorship from the CIA, from the CIA-connected Washington Post, and from other U.S. power centers, as part of a Cold War strategy. How this continues to play out can be discerned by the support given by Soros’s Open Society network to “women’s issues,” including “reproductive rights.” Is the ultimate objective the replacement of genders per se, like the replacement of races, by creating a nebulous mass of economic automatons, without gender or race or attachment to a homeland? Is transgenderism the next step in that process? Since sexual dimorphism is increasingly pronounced the further one goes up the scale of species hierarchy, one might wonder whether the aim of those who sponsor feminism and what is becoming referred to as “gradients of sexuality” is to establish an amorphous mass that is raceless, sexless, landless, and cultureless. Why do economic automatons need any of those attachments, when they get in the way of maximum exploitation? Again, this is done doublespeak style in the name of “opposing exploitation.”

Miss Mészáros cites Australian feminist Polly Dunning writing in the Morning Herald over her revulsion of being pregnant with a son, which she later tempered by saying that he would be raised as a feminist. (Mészáros, A Fair Hearing, p. 55). But after over 50 years of feminism women are in a declining position according to the feminists, never mind that feminism has assisted in the destruction of the traditional protection-and-sustenance male-female pair bond. We are told that the patriarchy has made women “homeless.” If feminism sought to destroy the home, I suppose homelessness might be a by-product of neurosis- and psychosis-induced women who have sought meaning as part of the economy rather than as wives and mothers, and if the economy malfunctions, as it inherently does under the debt-finance system, then women in the workforce are going to take the consequences like men: surely an example of equality?

Marcus Follin (a.k.a. “The Golden One”) is a bodybuilder and You Tube commentator who seeks to provide an example to young folk. His message is one of ironing out individual weaknesses to succeed in one’s aims rather than making do with something lesser. Use failures and drawbacks to identify what needs correcting in oneself and surmount it, states Mr Follin in a chapter called “Cut off the Path of Retreat.” It seems to suggest a Nietzschean type of self-overcoming, or a Jungian individuation, where the total being is integrated mentally and physically, or the Classical ideal of balance.

Jared Howe is an example of the many who are coming to the Alt-Right form the “liberty movement,” in this instance from the Ron Paul presidential campaigns. There have been sundry notables among the Alt-Right or New Right in the USA originating as libertarians, one example being Dr. Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents/North American New Right. These libertarians embark on routes that take them to White advocacy. While Dr. Johnson has purged himself of all things libertarian and, most laudably, the silly notion of Free Trade being compatible with the Right, other converts to the Right from libertarianism seem to retain the Free Trade doctrine which derailed the Old Right during the 1960s. Nonetheless, Howe’s “Regarding the Insidious Libertarian-to-Alt-Right Pipeline” is an interesting explanation of the phenomenon from his experiences. Hence his initial sentence is from Matt Lewis of the Daily Beast that “Libertarianism has an alt-right problem. Many prominent leaders of the alt-right have, at some point, identified as libertarians. I am curious as to … why?” (p. 64). What Mr Howe saw was the manner by which Left-liberals subverted the libertarian movement, and in particular condemn the “fascist,” “statist” character of border controls and immigration restrictions. Mr Howe and others such as Lew Rockwell argue that such “open borders are an assault on private property.” (Howe, A Fair Hearing, p. 67). I am not convinced that an appeal to property rights is a strong argument, but if it can get intelligent libertarians thinking, that is to be welcomed, so long as they do not subvert the Right as they did post-1945 with their preoccupations about private property versus “socialism,” where what the Right traditionally argues for is what Spengler called “Prussian Socialism.” (Spengler, Prussian Socialism and Other Essays, Black House Publishing, 2018).

Ethan Edwards uses a comment by actor/director Rob Reiner, of Archie Bunker memory, to examine how the Left sees the Trump presidency in their ongoing attack on White America, quoting Mr Reiner: “Make no mistake, this shutdown boils down to one thing: RACISM. GOP frightened to death of the browning of America. They will lose this last battle of the Civil War. Diversity is our strength.” The interregnum was the Civil Rights Movement. (Edwards, A Fair Hearing, p. 77). Never mind that desegregation has been a disaster for everyone. Facts should not undermine dogma, and the Left is nothing if not dogma-driven. Mr Reiner is an interesting example of the Leftist elite: of Jewish origin, but an atheist, conforming to Hollywood clichés, a supporter of Hilary Clinton, the oligarch’s choice; this good liberal has joined the Left-oligarchic-neocon axis against Trump, as a member of the advisory board of the Committee to Investigate Russia, hobnobbing with former CIA directors and the like, in a shared hatred of both Trump and Putin. (Committee to Investigate Russia, Advisory Board, https://investigaterussia.org/advisory-board ). Mr Edwards states that Mr Reiner et al “know that something important has been unleashed, and that this may well end in their being knocked from their perches and set upon by angry mobs.” “We have seen the little man behind the curtain, and he looks a lot like Harvey Weinstein. The leftist dream, the promise of a someday color-blind, gender-blind, multicultural utopia, is dead and starting to smell.” (Edwards, A Fair Hearing, p. 83). What we might also be reminded of, however, by this reference to a Hollywood identity, is that the President Trump victory shows that a political grassroots revolt is not sufficient; not by a long shot. What is required is a cultural revolution, or what the Alt-Right and New Right call metapolitics. Trump is showing how little a U.S. president, or any nation’s political leader, can actually do. The state is only one part of a pervasive apparatus that the New Left called “The System,” (despite the irony of the New Left being a controlled opposition of that “System”). The entertainment industry, news media and Hollywood, music and now social media, are an essential part of that System. When someone is perceived as opposing any aspect of that “System” he is destroyed on a multiplicity of levels, as shown by the fate of Senator Joseph McCarthy, General Patton, or Edwin Walker. Reiner is an essential part of that “System,” with the posturing typical of a liberal lackey, like the gaggle of other “entertainment celebrities” who jump on to any such bandwagon, to pose as “radicals” in the pursuit of causes that a thoroughly conformist.

Bre Faucheux, a novelist and former feminist who “red pilled,” and now hosts 27 Crows Radio, explains “How the Alt-Right Benefits Women.” The Left and its System masters portray the Alt-Right as not only a male phenomenon but anti-female. Those women who are attracted to the Alt-Right are presented as “psychologically defective,” [which we should recall is a strategy that was contrived by Theodor Adorno et al in the epochal study The Authoritarian Personality, with his “F” for “Fascism” scale that classified hitherto normal attitudes as intrinsically genocidal]. Given that feminism had sponsorship from The Washington Post, CIA, and sundry Foundations, one should question the motives. Miss Faucheux provides an answer: 71% of women in the Western world are working mothers. (Faucheux, A Fair Hearing, p. 89). The number goes up when it is considered that stay-at-home mothers are mostly non-white immigrants. While the Western patriarchy has been targeted, paradoxically, the multicultural immigration programs sponsored by the same power cabals that sponsor feminism are importing a “patriarchy” that, states Miss Faucheux, has no respect for women.

The contradictory character of liberalism and the Left has seen homosexuals and feminists come over to the Right on the matter of multiculturalism, because they see Western Enlightenment liberalism being undermined by Third World migration. Unfortunately ,this seeming advance of the Right is rather another subversion and diversion, as Western Enlightenment liberalism is not “Right,” so we get a plethora of pseudo-Right parties, some having done quite well on the anti-immigration bandwagon, such as UKIP and Geert Wilder’s Freedom Party, that are far removed from the “Right” in everything but a reaction to immigration. We might be reminded that the assassinated Dutch anti-immigration politician Pim Fortuyn came over from the Left to the “Right” because of Muslim attitudes towards homosexuality. His party remained thoroughly liberal, despite being labeled as “Right,” and of course diverted what would otherwise have been support for the actual Right. Staying with The Netherlands, as an example, Geert Wilders’ Party of Freedom unequivocally states that it is a “liberal” party.

Miss Faucheux states that given the violent character of the opposition to the Right, it is often not a good place for women to be, while the Alt-Right males maintain the protective instincts that are part of an ancient legacy. Miss Faucheux has noted that the tactic of the Left is to put their women at the front in any confrontation with the Right. As she states, it lacks class and chivalry. (Faucheux, A Fair Hearing, p. 91). Such notions are beyond the comprehension of the Left; that is the nature of those attracted to it. Chivalry would be dismissed as “reactionary.” “Women build the nests. Men reshape the world,” and they are most successful in doing so when women build “a strong nest,” she writes. (Faucheux, p. 92). That there are women who find such a prospect abhorrent states something of their mental state, rationalized as an ideology. It was not always that way: the Suffragettes in Britain, prior to and during World War I, were authoritarian, martial, patriotic, and notable figures such as Adele Pankhurst, Norah Elam and Mary Allen (founder of the women’s police auxiliary) supported the inter-war radical Right, with Elam, Allen and other Suffragette notables committing themselves to Oswald Mosley. Women such as Elizabeth Dilling were notable as leaders in the pre-World War II American Right, and remained so soon after the war. Miss Faucheux concludes with: “In the final telling, the alt-right benefits women by allowing them to be who and what they actually are.” (Faucheux, p. 93).

Richard Spencer, whose name is synonymous with Alt-Right, considers the etiolating impact of spectator sports, with particular focus on the Black-dominated National Football League. He makes an interesting point, quoting Robert E. Lee that slavery degrades both master and slave, adding that the “black playing sees himself as a kind of thuggish fool, a high paid slave who puts his body and ego on the line for overweight white fans who call him abusive names if he drops a pass…” (Spencer, A Fair Hearing, p. 99). As for the spectator life, Spencer states that “The system does not want us to do; it wants us to watch. It doesn’t want us to create but consume… ‘Fandom’ is the collective identity the system is willing to offer us.” It weakens, while providing revenue. “So be a man. Stop being a fan.” (Spencer, p. 111).

Jared Taylor, starting American Renaissance as a print magazine in 1990, is one of the links between generations. The focus is on race, with both its biological and sociological ramifications, in the chapter “Race Realism,” a term that confronts such Left/Liberal words as “racism,” and “white supremacists.” Mr Taylor’s position, and that of the Alt-Right generally in the Anglophone world, the world of Darwin, Galton, Madison Grant, et al is one of genetic determinism, in seeking to confound the Leftist definition of race as a “social construct” that can be deconstructed, albeit only if it is “white.” For the European New Right, with a legacy of Spengler, Voegelin, Jung, Fichte and Herder, the concept of “race” is an historical construct rather than primarily a question of genetic clusters. (Bolton, The Decline and Fall of Civilisations, Black House Publishing, 2017). Nonetheless, however one wants to proceeds, “race” is a “reality” which gives meaning and identity, something that is recognized as much by the Left as the Right, with the exception that it is only the “White” who is denied that identity with the use of semantics rather than science. Taylor points out that “pride” for a non-white “becomes “hate” for a “white.”

Roderick Kaine, a biochemist, considers breeding patterns in “The Sexual Prisoner’s Dilemma.” His approach is sociobiological and one of long-term group interest versus short-term individual interests. The high divorce rate in the West, mainly initiated by women, is a reflection of fundamental sociobiolgical premises.

Bill Matheson in “Irreconcilable Differences” goes through the fundamentals of human race differences, analogous to other forms of speciation. He confounds the assumption that being able to reproduce fertile offspring is necessarily an indicator of a common species. He asks why Black differences that account for their success in certain sports for example, are celebrated, while failures in other areas are blamed on White oppression?

Emeritus professor of psychology Dr Kevin MacDonald outlines the issue for which he is most widely known – the Jewish Question, in “The Alt-Right and the Jews.” He approaches the question of Jews within the “Right,” which usually means the neoconservatives, pointing out that here too Jewish interests over-ride American, (MacDonald, A Fair Hearing, p. 148), albeit behind a façade of “patriotism,” as distinct from the traditional Jewish involvement in the Left. Yet even within the Jewish “Right” there is still the promotion of open borders, and despite Trump’s zeal for Israel and his Jewish family connections, Jewish neocons such as Daniel Pipes largely remain as adverse to President Trump as Jewish Leftists and for the same reasons. (MacDonald, p. 150). When Jews exerted influence over the Old Right they used their positions to purge real nationalists, as happened to Revilo Oliver, Patrick Buchanan, and more recently Joe Sobran, Samuel Francis, and Richard Spencer.

Dr MacDonald cites the role of Jews in entering the conservative movements in Germany and Austria and attempting to derail these from a völkish doctrine, analogous to the present Jewish background of the neocons claiming to represent the American Right. (MacDonald, pp. 158-159). However, there seems to be a trend, hopefully marginal, within the Alt-Right that is intent on placing Jews in a no-win situation, by damning not only the Leftists and neocons, but those in the Alt-Right as cunning infiltrators. It is enough for some that Dr. Paul Gottfried is a Jew, whatever his other qualities, and that Oswald Spengler had Jews in the family tree. Dr MacDonald concludes that “In guarded optimism, we might look to the future and hope that some influential Jews… come to see that their own best interests lie with a renewed European America.” (MacDonald, p. 161). Yet when some do so, they are still regarded not just with suspicion but with anathema. In the USA Benjamin H Freedman and Henry Klein endured much in confronting the Jewish agenda, and supporting nationalists. It is forgotten history that there were many Jews in Weimar Germany that participated in German-Jewish nationalist and veterans’ association, that abhorred both Communism and Zionism, that the head of the Stahlhelm was a Jew, that prior to Hitler few German-Jews supported Zionism, and regarded themselves as Germans of Jewish descent, not as Jews in Germany, and that German-Jews, certain allegations to the contrary, generally had an impressive war record. (Bolton, Zionism, Islam and the West, Black House, pp. 79-101).

Ryan Faulk of the Alternative Hypothesis argues that biological evolution can happen quickly within a generation, and that an entire population can gain a new trait within a short period. This has had a eugenic impact. Faulk sees the modern world as a vast improvement on the Medieval era, now that we have free markets rather than trade regulation. He sees economic progress as occurring in tandem with eugenic processes. A “New European” appeared that created “modern government, modern conceptions of human rights, modern manufacturing and technology, and the generalized economy we are all familiar with,” (Faulk, A Fair Hearing, p. 170). – to which I suggest this also means the ineptitude of parliamentary democracy, the dissolution of the rights of association and co-operation, the dominance of usury and monopoly, longer working hours, alienation and futility, distortion of form in art and architecture, and the forgetting of medical and other techniques through the disparaging of the “Gothic” in favor of an obsession with reviving the Graeco-Roman, that served as a model for the Western Enlightenment, which diverted the West from its High Culture into something inane and fractured. While I would not wish to return to the brute savagery of a past era, the psyche of man often lags behind his social environment, as Jung and others have stated, with a multi-layered unconscious that remains in different phases of his ancestral past. We need not revive what Faulk states was the Medieval practice of cat-burning, for example, to return the guild and its social ethos, and ban usury.

Daniel Friberg explains “The Metapolitical Warfare of the Alt-Right.” Mr Friberg begins by abjuring those who regard withdrawing from society, rationalized by Julius Evola’s dictum, “ride the tiger,” in the hope that they can maintain their inner integrity [for perhaps several centuries?] while the System implodes and a new era emerges. Mr Friberg states that this might include “accumulating empty beer bottles and binging on porn in a seedy apartment…” They might venture, thanks to the internet to criticize others who are trying to do things, as being too moderate, too liberal, or criticize some characteristic they discern in someone who is trying to do things. (Friberg, A Fair Hearing, p. 177). I suggest that one practical means that could be employed is a stricter approach by editors to website forums, where the inane and the outright abusive are permitted free-flow in the name of free-speech.

George T. Shaw, the editor of the volume, offers some semantic strategies in “Dismantling Anti-White Newspeak,” referring to Orwell’s description of “newspeak” in Nineteen Eighty-Four. The Left and its System controllers use newspeak continually, where slogans are now regarded as intellectual discourses, such as “diversity is our strength,” (Shaw, A Fair Hearing, p. 185) or telling a debt-ridden, overworked, underpaid, White laborer that he rides the crest of “white privilege.” Shaw explains that “a Newspeak term is a vessel for delivering absurdities past our logical defenses…” (Shaw, p. 188). This vessel is reinterpreted to fit an agenda. Hence, “racism” becomes an implicit evil, rather than a world-view that might have a scientific predicate. “Sexist” is someone who holds an outlook that was “normal” until Theodor Adorno and the American Jewish Committee decided otherwise (The Authoritarian Personality, which the AJC sponsored), although Orthodox Jewish attitudes towards women do not seem to be included in such studies, nor why Jewish women are so prominent in “feminism.” Shaw suggests that the Newspeak of the “shitlibs” (sic) be confronted with analytical precision as to definitions: “One can simply say ‘Define x’.” (Shaw, p. 191) Shaw includes “A Counterrevolutionary Lexicon,” with definitions of “Bugman,” “Cat Lady,” and “THOT.”

Conclusion

The multiplicity of views and backgrounds of the Alt-Right are well captured in A Fair Hearing. As one would expect from this American manifestation of the European New Right, albeit with origins going back to the Old Right in the USA, it has its own foci. These in particular revolve around race and biology. This is not surprising given the relationship between whites and blacks since the founding of the American Colonies. Also relevant is the Anglophone legacy of race theory deriving from Darwin and Galton, and developed by Anglo-Americans such as Madison Grant and Lothrop Stoddard. On the Occident the New Right has developed along different lines, with the legacy of Spengler, Nietzsche et al. What remains overlooked are socioeconomic and financial issues, which seem hardly discernible in the Alt-Right, but which have a legacy in Father Coughlin, Congressman McFadden, and Ezra Pound. While the attitude is generally that “race is the issue,” and that financial questions can be considered after race survival is secured, Spengler and Brooks Adams (The Law of Civilization and Decay, 1896) pointed out that the rise of plutocracy is a symptom of certain epochs of civilisation, and it is hence a culture problem. Such questions are the soft underbelly of the Left, which does not aim to transcend capitalism, as Spengler and Evola showed.

 
Hide 68 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. tac says:

    A good portion of the alt-right has been, from the outset, controlled opposition like Gavin McInnes–founder of the proud boys–who will tout a controlled narrative meant not to blame the real culprit.

    Jimmy Dore show Wherein he blasts MSNBC, CNN, Fox and the other MSM lapdogs:

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  2. Rational says:

    THE ALT-RIGHT—EPIC BATTLE OF GOOD VERSUS EVIL.

    Thanks for the excellent article, Sir. Lots of useful info.

    The alt-right is an interesting term, but like you say, the alt right is basically people who believe in the things you mentioned—the right of white people to stand up against the theft of their homeland by immigration and the war on their race.

    White people not only have a right, but a duty, to protect themselves, their culture, their homeland, and their race–from being ethnically cleansed out.

    There are no ifs or buts about it.

    The liberals who attack us for standing up for these basic principles are not just people of a different honest opinion, but they are evil and their motives and tactics are evil. Eg. Antifas are criminals.

    We are in epic battle of good versus evil and we are the good, and they are the evil. This is not just a self-serving statement, but a matter of obvious fact that we must not lose sight of. What that means is, that we must not cower or give in to their bullying and aggressive screams of “racist”, “racist” but persist, and persist, as great men of character and valor do in adverse times.

    • Agree: SBaker
  3. Glancing through the 6300 words the German expression ‘in der Beschränkung zeigt sich der Meister’, somewhat the same as a Dutch civil servant began a memo ‘I excuse myself for the long memo, did not have the time to write a short one’.
    The Gettysburgh Address also comes in my mind.
    But possibly my limited knowledge about Alt Right is a factor.
    What we have nowadays is a clash of cultures, where the white culture, despite its superior contributions to civilisation in science and technology, is on the losing side.
    In stead of being proud many whites see themselves as evil.
    But, it must be admitted that Churchill was right, ‘ the higher civilisation has the better weapons’, though it might seem that ‘a society with better weapons is higher’.
    One more thing, I more and more am beginning to think that many peoples under colonialism had better lives than under self rule.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  4. Socail leftism of Pim Fortuyn and Gert Wilders have nothing to do with classical liberalism. For example, classical liberal James Fitzjames Stephen, countering James Stuart Mill, insisted in his “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” that state should intervene in upholding of public morality. In Weimar Germany where communists and to lesser degree Social Democrats were already supporting early gay movement led by Magnus Hirschfeld, not only most of liberals wanted to uphold German anti-sodomy laws but some of them participated in proposals to make punishment for homosexual act more severe.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  5. Alt-Right Leaders

    The problem with the “white movement” is that few of its “leaders” are impressive self-made billionaires like Donald Trump.

    Spencer, who apparently needed a DNA test to figure out his own European ancestry (So many white American nationalists have not a clue what city in Europe their family is from; this is odd to a Northern white since most of us are the great-grandchildren of immigrants from 1900 or so) was a perpetual student still working on that degree at age 30.

    The leaders of the Alt-Right look like they were old enough to have bought Nirvana albums on CD and are just not not that impressive.

    A white ethno-state run by Richard Spencer or Roosh, who hangs around clubs trying to make coeds when he is 40 and has grey threading through his beard. These guys are my age, practically. Where were they when Gen X was making money in the 90′s?

    • Replies: @El Dato
  6. Sean says:

    Dr. Gottfried is an example of a Jew whose sincerity and contribution to the Right (whether called “palaeo,” “true,” real” or “Old”) might only be questioned by the most obsessive Judaeophobes of which the Right, Old, Alt and New, has many, as distinct from a justified and rational “Counter-Semitism,” defined in George T. Shaw’s “Alt-Right Counterrevolutionary Lexicon” as “suspicion of or distaste for Jewish behaviors and agendas as a response to initiatory hostile actions from Jews.”

    Ninth Circle (Treachery)

    Dante speaks to the traitors in the ice, Canto XXXII.
    Canto XXXII
    At the base of the well, Dante finds himself within a large frozen lake: Cocytus, the Ninth Circle of Hell. Trapped in the ice, each according to his guilt, are punished sinners guilty of treachery against those with whom they had special relationships. The lake of ice is divided into four concentric rings (or “rounds”) of traitors corresponding, in order of seriousness, to betrayal of family ties, betrayal of community ties, betrayal of guests, and betrayal of lords. This is in contrast to the popular image of Hell as fiery; as Ciardi writes, “The treacheries of these souls were denials of love (which is God) and of all human warmth. Only the remorseless dead center of the ice will serve to express their natures. As they denied God’s love, so are they furthest removed from the light and warmth of His Sun. As they denied all human ties, so are they bound only by the unyielding ice.”[97] This final, deepest level of hell is reserved for traitors, betrayers and oathbreakers.

    Kol Nidre (Aramaic: כָּל נִדְרֵי) is a recited in the synagogue before the beginning of the evening service on every Yom Kippur.

    “All vows we are likely to make, all oaths and pledges we are likely to take between this Yom Kippur and the next Yom Kippur, we publicly renounce. Let them all be relinquished and abandoned, null and void, neither firm nor established. Let our vows, pledges and oaths be considered neither vows nor pledges nor oaths.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_S._Mosby

    “I am not ashamed of having fought on the side of slavery—a soldier fights for his country—right or wrong—he is not responsible for the political merits of the course he fights in” and that “The South was my country”.

  7. anonymous[204] • Disclaimer says:

    K.I.S.S.

    80 % of USAians think Putin “interfered” with election in order to elect Trump, and they maintain equally fervently that “Hillary got more votes.”

    You are dealing with a morbidly dumbed down populace.

    Evola?

    Isn’t that a flesh eating mosquito released by Iranians in death camps ??

  8. Vinnie O says:

    Thanks a whole friggin’ lot. Now I’ve got 10 more books to read. Just when I thought I was almost caught up.

  9. Miro23 says:

    “Deconstructing a group’s identity as entirely negative is a precursor to politically, economically, and physically destroying that group.” (Hood, p. 8).

    That’s the way the Bolsheviks did it, and to look for any sense in their “dialectic” is pointless.

    It’s an attack on the traditional (majority) holders of power in a country (ethnic Russians in Russia, Germans in Germany and Anglo-Europeans in the US) with a view to taking absolute power. Jewish activists successfully took power in Russia 1917 (Lenin & Trotsky with their Bolshevik Terror), for a while in Hungary in 1919 ( Kuhn’s Hungarian Soviet Republic with its Red Terror) and failed in Germany 1919 (Luxemburg’s Spartacist Uprising in Berlin + Levine’s Bavarian Soviet Republic).

    It’s instructive that both the German coups failed in intense street fighting involving artillery, flamethrowers and armored vehicles as Germany’s 20.000 strong paramilitary Freikorps destroyed them and directly executed Luxemburg & Levine.

  10. conatus says:

    Richard Spencer’s ‘Stop Watching Football’ is a good essay, included in the book. People feel insignificant in a crowded world and being part of something bigger than themselves sort of erases that feeling of insignificance.
    So put on your Giants jersey and paint your face blue and white. On game day sit in the parking lot(because you can’t afford a ticket) and root for a bunch of guys who dislike you because of the color of your skin. (It is still white underneath all that blue and white paint). That is the theme of the movie ‘Big Fan’ that Spencer mentions in his essay.
    How about spending that energy sticking up for your grandchildren on Intersectionality(who’s the biggest victim) grounds so your granddaughter won’t have to pull tricks to survive?
    This misdirected energy and time also applies to the wealthy Whites as Steve Sailer has mentioned many times, where the Jews buy politicians, wealthy goyim types contribute to their college football team.Huh? How is that gunna help your granddaughter?
    So while other Identities have an outlet for their Insignificance fears(BLM, ADL,La Raza) YT sees only social disapproval and possible unemployment in engaging in Identity politics so he runs to the parking lot to root for the National Felons League. “I am a Giants fan”
    ‘An expense of spirit in a waste of shame’ this lust for something bigger than yourself would be better spent in a more pragmatic way so your granddaughter doesn’t have to pull those tricks to survive. Ask the South African farmer’s granddaughters what they are gunna do?Richard Spencer’s ‘Stop Watching Football’ is a good essay, included in the book. People feel insignificant in a crowded world and being part of something bigger than themselves sort of erases that feeling of insignificance.
    So put on your Giants jersey and paint your face blue and white. On game day sit in the parking lot(because you can’t afford a ticket) and root for a bunch of guys who dislike you because of the color of your skin. (It is still white underneath all that blue and white paint). That is the theme of the movie ‘Big Fan’ that Spencer mentions in his essay.
    How about spending that energy sticking up for your grandchildren on Intersectionality(who’s the biggest victim) grounds so your granddaughter won’t have to pull tricks to survive?
    This misdirected energy and time also applies to the wealthy Whites as Steve Sailer has mentioned many times, where the Jews buy politicians, wealthy goyim types contribute to their college football team.Huh? How is that gunna help your granddaughter?
    So while other Identities have an outlet for their Insignificance fears(BLM, ADL,La Raza) YT sees only social disapproval and possible unemployment in engaging in Identity politics so he runs to the parking lot to root for the National Felons League. “I am a Giants fan”
    ‘An expense of spirit in a waste of shame’ this lust for something bigger than yourself would be better spent in a more pragmatic way so your granddaughter doesn’t have to pull those tricks to survive. Ask the South African farmer’s granddaughters what they are gunna do?

  11. @Hildebrand

    Both Fortuyn and Wilders, earlier Janmaat, were/are, primarily against Muslim immigration.
    Fortuyn, a homosexual, felt particularly offended ‘for them I’m less than a dog’.
    Wilders, his grandmother jewish, his grandfather made to resign because of not paying bills in the then Dutch Indies, by Muslims, on top of that Wilders lived in Israel for two years or so, is mainly a Islam hater.
    Wilders is unable to see what the west and Israel perpetrate on Muslims.

  12. @Miro23

    Indeed, Rudolf Hess fired with artillery in the streets, as there had been no time to fix the cannon properly into the street, with each shot he went backwards several metres

  13. How does one leave out from such an article George Lincoln Rockwell, William Luther Pierce, David Duke, the National Alliance…?

    • Replies: @Them Guys
    , @THIM
  14. schrub says:

    Just how bad can it get?

    Here is an interview Tucker Carson has just had with the recently released UK activist Tommy Robinson about his treatment in prison.

    The UK is now worse than the USSR. Truly disturbing!!!

    http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/tommy-robinson-gives-powerful-interview-with-tucker-carlson/

  15. If I understand Mr Bolton correctly, he sees the US alt-right as people who essentially seek to use Trump as a useful idiot to advance the interests of Vladimir Putin. Why he assimilates the interests of Vladimir Putin to those of the US is something he needs to explain.

    • Replies: @El Dato
  16. Rich says:

    “Judaeophobe”? I don’t think this is the correct word. “Judaeophobe” implies a fear of Jews, which I doubt many on the Alt-Right, or Traditional Right have. Anti-Jewish, or ant-leftist, or even anti-Bolshevik might be better?

  17. Dan443 says:

    There can be no advancement of the true Right, in any form, without first completely defeating the Neoconservatives and their sock puppets.

    They need to be driven so hard into the deep Earth that they can never rise again.

    Unless and until this occurs, communism as its assurance of eventual total victory.

  18. “Even a good idea has little value when enunciated by a solemn ass.” – Oswald Spengler

  19. Richard Spencer is a creation of the Eric Holder Department of Justice. He’s controlled opposition; a minion in the ongoing war against whiteness waged by the Holder operatives still embedded within the DOJ bureaucracy. Peter Strzok is the public face of this network, which also includes John Brennan. In the fevered minds of these Trotskyites, the war against Trump is also a war against whiteness.

  20. Them Guys says:
    @Miro23

    Miro23: Which well proves that in the article where he said that at this point, No Matter What right side White’s do or don’t do….They Lose. Not exact quoted obviously. But its what he meant.

    Or as from another website owners coined phrase states, at site of Incogman website.

    “All of You White’s that Seek & Speak Factual Truth’s….Are Going to Be Hated, and Called Vile names such as, Evil Nazi’s, and Jew Hater’s and Rabid Racist’s and their all time favorite slander of, Antisemite!…No Matter What You Do, Good or Bad….Therefore, You May as Well Go All Out”

    Many, perhaps Most White’s at this point so far, are as yet not willing to admit to this factor as stated above in Incogman’s quote. They do admit that Whitey has been totally targeted for destruction, and final replacement by Browning and Blackening of America, and that the rate of such has accelerated into Hyper Velocity Warp Speed just within the past few years or so.

    Yet at same time, they refuse to admit that, like it or not, there Now is not, and likely wont be in near future terms, any real political solution based on voting for various perceived pro Whitey Pols. Nor a vote cast for any so called anti illegal immigrants proponents. Due to every time, every one elected quickly shows true stripe’s and turns a 180 degree opposite after safely elected.

    I am 65 years old now, and in my entire lifetime, I cannot recall a single time we got an elected official that actually stood by any promotional stated pro whitey etc statements once elected. And actually made a difference we consider as good for Whitey or America.

    There simply exists zero real valid or doable political solutions. Nor can or will any sort of conversing or debating with the opposition that so hate Whites, and especially White Males. Do any real good nor maintain any valid lasting reality that can then lead to a real valid solution.

    It sounds very unfortunate, and I too agree with it, but we have now reached a point close to exactly as happened prior in 1917 Russia, and as well in 1920-30′s Germany, where we now live in the eerie quiet just before the vast storm arrives. Yes in a national and nationwide sense, that coming storm may get held off for perhaps yet another decade or even two decades if lucky.

    However, that storm of total evilness awaiting its turn to pounce upon Whites within the usa lands, is probably not going to be halted on any permanent basis, unless of course we experience a true Divine Intervention. And so far with what I have seen in the past 40-50 years of life in usa, and all that has downgraded in society etc. I wont hold breath for any such divine intervention any time soon if at all. Yes I do hope sincerely I am totally wrong about this stuff. But do not think I am.

    Hence, at some future point and likely while many of Us boomer gen guys still remain alive, we will experience a scenario very few are really prepared to deal with, and many wont be able to even if well prepared and well armed etc.

    One thing that truely baffels me most is how, so many folks, Whitey’s mainly, have kids and grand kids, yet are so fully unaware and uncareing of this situation. I have No kids nor grand kids. I thank God for it too at this point. But what of the rest? A vast majority do have kids and grand kids…yet most care not a whit about anything other than nigger ball sports games on tv=Talmudvision aka, Electronic Rabbi in their living room’s. And get their entire world view of whats going on Via Fox TV news shows, and Sunday preacher dog & pony shows always related to and revolving around, Jews and Israel and abject Worship of both, teachings. That is the main primary influences and typical extent of their full knowledges of what really matters most. Even to nicely mildly suggest to them that, perhaps there is a bit more they need concern selves with, or do research on? Forget it unless you want to be a forever new enemy of them. These fools will be first at bat to call vile names at you. And literally have spittle or drool dripping with every vile name they label you with.

    I rekon they justify it as some form of true christian Hatred eh?! as much an oxymoronic statement as calling them selves a jewdeo-christian.

    Wherein one can locate the deep rooted and very real base problem. Of Infiltrations by international jewry, and at most every level that matters today. Which is also why I do not believe anything but a very small, even tiny number total of jewish involvement can or will produce any real solid goodness within the right side movement or alt right or whatever name it calls itself now or later on. I realize many as stated in article wish this to not be true, however if one is to learn thru prior history and events, one must admit that in most every former political party, private org like Tea Partys, well funded or not Org’s, repubs or dem or libertarian, all of them at some point became infiltrated by what many assumed to be very well meaning and well versed or high intelectual type jewish people. Only to witness soon a destruction or irrelevance of the particular org or group or party until it has zero power or effect worth a thin dime.

    With many members of alt right or tea party etc being more motivated to join up, in order for it to be a percieved avenue of selling more new books and cashing in. What else is new eh?

    I do hope I get fully proven wrong as can be, and live to see a true great and White run America again…and done withOUT any blood spilled nor any violence on our parts…That’s a very swell sounding Dream, no?….But while we of late keep hearing of “Deams” and Mexican Illegal “Dreamers” galore…One must remain asleep at the wheel in order to dream. Only once wide awake can one deal with the situation at hand, and soon to worsen probably eh. What else for now can the avg reg normal White man do, other than await and lay low untill it all goes Hot and everyone then shall comprehend the wisdom of the 2nd amendt?

  21. Them Guys says:
    @George F. Held

    Duke and those others you named are too honest and far too truthful in speaking out on the vast Jewish problems. Those too honest guys are always Excluded, from every venue or party invite by the rest of self anointed leaders of anything to do with the Right or Alt-Right side. How can they sell more new books and cash in, if Dukes name is even mentioned in a passing sense eh? Also many have websites they own, and depend on ads for revenue. But most all online ads, same as off line mainstream ads are paid for by a jew buis owner who will yank his ad funds in a Jew York Minute, if any name like David Duke appears in print on a website his ads on.

  22. Parbes says:

    Rob Reiner is a truly vile and nauseating creature – both in terms of what he espouses, and also in physical appearance as well (the repulsive visage of the typical contemporary Western liberal middle-aged pseudointellectual, with the pudgy round face, the egg-shaped crown with the bald pate, the arrogant know-it-all messianic pout-smile, and the scraggly fringe of “university professah” beard). He and his ilk are detrimental to any healthy society or civilization – they should be purged, harshly punished, simply banished.

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
  23. m edward says:

    Wow ! A pretty extensive article.
    I just want to comment that the Alt-Right are controlled by Israel and Russia. Most of it’s “leaders” are Zionists and Neo-Bolsheviks.
    The purpose of the Alt-Right’s emergence during the last presidential election cycle was to support the Israeli/Russian puppet, Donald Trump.
    Trump was the lesser of two evils, but evil is the operative word……
    Zio-Bolshevism is EVIL !!!!!!!!!
    The only hope for western civilization begins with a military coup d’etat to restore the U.S. constitution and relpace the existing government and supreme court….
    Otherwise, it’s all over and global enslavement is just beyond the horizon.

  24. THIM says:
    @George F. Held

    Won`t get anywhere following that neo Nazi scum. The real Nazis, at least they were men. But this American neo Nazi trash you mentioned, no one wants to follow that garbage. The Third Reich died 73 long years ago. Everyone else has moved on. You should too.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @mcohen
    , @Jeff Stryker
  25. El Dato says:
    @Michael Kenny

    Keep smoking the peyoe Mr. Kenny, you will get it eventually.

  26. @Parbes

    He and his ilk are detrimental to any healthy society or civilization – they should be purged, harshly punished, simply banished.

    And then thrown into the Pit of Despair with the life-sucking machine cranked up to 11.

  27. El Dato says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    The leaders of the Alt-Right look like they were old enough to have bought Nirvana albums on CD and are just not not that impressive.

    Preferable to firebrand speakers that articulate well on the podium but are afflicted with illusions of adequacy as they have massaged the ideas in their head only once so far. That leads to major problems really quickly, as they are either bought out or lead a lynch mob out of the auditorium.

    And there is nothing wrong with Nirvana albums on CD.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  28. @Rational

    Only dogmatic ideologues reduce politics to a simple battle of good versus evil. Antifa also reduces politics to a battle of good versus evil. Politics is full of gray areas and lots of people hold hybrid positions which mix and match different ideologies. Doing so does not automatically mean you are “controlled opposition.”

    As far as overriding ideological trends we are shifting from a dogmatic neoliberal/progressive era into a much looser liberal populist era. This will involve a blending of liberal and populist/nationalist ideas. So don’t be surprised to see more anti-Islamic homosexuals, pro-tariff libertarians, Jewish immigration restrictionists, free speech lesbians, and other surprising political blends coming out of the woodwork.

    How far the nationalist/traditionalist right will benefit from this ideological shift remains to be seen.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  29. Wally says:
    @THIM

    Explain to us what’s wrong with “neo-Nazis & Nazis” in general.

    Can you do that?

    “We must vilify and incite hatred against those with which we disagree.”

    - Vladimir Lenin

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

  30. peterAUS says:
    @unpc downunder

    Good post.
    Agree with

    Politics is full of gray areas and lots of people hold hybrid positions which mix and match different ideologies.

    with

    As far as overriding ideological trends we are shifting from a dogmatic neoliberal/progressive era into a much looser liberal populist era.

    and

    How far the nationalist/traditionalist right will benefit from this ideological shift remains to be seen.

  31. Jason Liu says:

    These particular figures don’t seem to represent the alt-right, though. Most of them predate the alt-right.

    By and large the Alt-right is a bunch of disorganized, unserious fuckbois with terrible social/verbal skills who think trolling is the height of ideological conflict. At first they seemed like something new, now they’re just a younger version of Stormfront, and nearly as ineffective.

    The neoreactionary/dark enlightenment people would’ve kicked much more leftist ass in the culture wars because they focus on the ideological root of the problem, not just screeching about the symptoms.

    • Agree: Thomm
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  32. I believe the hour has passed for independence of the white, Christian race and any attempt even to secure what is highly improbable will result in an impossible situation, furthering woes to no end thus, leaving it in a catch-22… damned, you are if either you do or you don’t!

  33. Thomm says:

    The thing is, the ‘Alt-Right’ is really just ‘Paleo-Left’, since White Trashionalists have very left-wing economic views. This is evidenced by their strong affinity for Bernie Sanders.

    There are many examples of Nationalist-Leftist groups in the past, from the Third Reich to the KKK.

    The real Alt-Right is the Anti-Misandry Sphere, since ‘feminism’ is the ultimate big-government ideology. Most White Trashionalist have an immense ideological overlap with ‘feminism’, due to White Trashionalism being dominated by incel males and/or homosexuals.

  34. Who owns the definition of Alt-Right?

    I agree that the Clinton campaign popularized it as a durogatory term. But it was just like “racist, sexist, misogynyst, homophobe, hater,” etc. – just another label used to slander anyone they disagreed with.

    A property rights advocate is alt-right. So is an advocate for jury trials or someone for controlled borders.

    It’s just another emotional-warfare Saul Alinsky tactic of the left. If you want to implement Marxism then first you make normal people out to be some insane new threat.

    Certainly, many took joy in being the enemy of Clinton, and embraced the term as their own. They co-opted the term in the same way Trump supporters co-opted “fake news”.

    But there was no self-initiating political movement calling itself “alt-right”. Not that I could see.

  35. @El Dato

    I don’t think Spencer is particularly articulate. His speeches about white ethnic states have been around since Geraldo brawls and there is no possible way that a white ethno-state would be formed in the US through eminent domain.

    What has happened is that whites have been transformed into transients. They’re born in a Midwest city that goes ghetto, so they move to California and then that becomes a dangerous barrio, they then move somewhere else.

    There’s little for whites to do but play hopscotch from one urban center to another once is goes South (Literally in the case of Los Angeles).

  36. @Jason Liu

    One is an open homosexual. Another haunts nightclubs and lives in his mother’s basement. Spencer was a perpetual student at the age of 20 who edited an online blog.

    These guys are going to be the leaders of the white ethnic state. Which is going to be where? The Ozark mountains? Alaska.

    Theoretically, it is possible with the vast US interior spaces to move out of the population centers but these places are remote.

    • Replies: @Eric Novak
  37. mcohen says:
    @THIM

    You have to wonder about this american generation of political players.they have swapped guns for iphones.twitter is the new weapon of choice.
    Never mind the weatherman.he is yesterday’s tv

  38. Hilary

    I was wondering where people got those extra Ls they misattributed to Michele Bachmann. They were taken from Hillary.

    Sam Dixon

    Sam Dickson. Let’s at least get the names on our side right.

  39. Friedrich Engels… did not see anything of “white privilege.”

    No, but he prefigured John Lennon’s “Woman is the Nigger of the World” by almost a century. That was his true destructive influence on the West.

    Similarly, abortion was mostly a men’s issue in the 1950s and early 1960s. Gotta keep a close eye on male feminists, the worst kind.

  40. @THIM

    Duke lives in the Ukraine.

    Roosh V lives in Mom’s basement.

    Spencer was some perpetual student whose life experience including being on campus and a brief spell as a contributor to an online blog.

    Milo is gay and Jewish and kisses his boyfriend in public.

  41. @jilles dykstra

    …a Dutch civil servant began a memo ‘I excuse myself for the long memo, did not have the time to write a short one’.

    The Dutch read Mark Twain, too?

  42. Art says:

    The Alt-Right has a huge problem – it is not defending Christian Western culture – the very best thing about us, is our culture – not our skin.

    We need to be defending Christianity and the culture it produced – not white skin color.

    In 6,300 words there is one reference to “Western culture” – and there is NO reference to “Christianity.”

    Clearly the Jews have been successful in eliminating Christian philosophy from the equation.

    Maybe it is to late, but by putting Christianity back in the equation — we will not have a race war, that we cannot win.

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Maintain Hope, Love, Truth, & Idealism — Art

    p.s. Sorry but some truth, Trump’s belligerence and shallowness are feeding our divisions.

    p.s. He is doing some right things, but in the wrong way (especially with his Jew dominated foreign policy).

    • Replies: @SBaker
    , @Miro23
  43. renfro says:
    @Miro23

    “Deconstructing a group’s identity as entirely negative is a precursor to politically, economically, and physically destroying that group.” (Hood, p. 8).

    Of course it is.

    And as French writer Jean Francois Revel wrote,…… “Clearly, a civilization that feels guilty for everything it is and does will lack the energy and conviction to defend itself.”…….. is another tactic being used to destroy white culture and the US…..the constant drumbeat of condemning the evil white man.

    I am however not too worried about whites being replaced in the end ….history as a guide will confirm one thing they accuse us of …..that we many white Europeans, Irish, Scots, etc., are descended from are the violent, war loving Celtic and Viking barbarians that populated Europe …..conquest is our history.
    So there will be wars of sorts when whites can no longer tolerate the chattering mass that hates us.

  44. “Prussian socialism”? I can’t think of too many things that sound more un-American.

    However, one particular shard of that political philosophy did make it to America and take root– the public school. Fat lot of good that did us.

    We’re homeschooling our kids. That’s illegal in today’s Prussia, by the way.

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
  45. renfro says:

    In the USA Benjamin H Freedman and Henry Klein endured much in confronting the Jewish agenda, and supporting nationalists. It is forgotten history that there were many Jews in Weimar Germany that participated in German-Jewish nationalist and veterans’ association, that abhorred both Communism and Zionism, that the head of the Stahlhelm was a Jew, that prior to Hitler few German-Jews supported Zionism, and regarded themselves as Germans of Jewish descent, not as Jews in Germany, and that German-Jews, certain allegations to the contrary, generally had an impressive war record.

    That is mostly true of ‘German’ Jews and by German Jews I mean those Jews who had been in Germany for many generations…..not the East European Jews, particularly the Polish Jews who had immigrated to Germany.

    BUT …….you do not want to do this:

    Dr MacDonald concludes that “In guarded optimism, we might look to the future and hope that some influential Jews… come to see that their own best interests lie with a renewed European America.”

    Because in the US (and Israel) you are not dealing with German Jews in the Jewish influential cabal—–you are dealing with Eastern European Jews primarily from Poland, Austria-Hungary, and Romania—-they are the 2 million Jews that came into the US between 1890 and 1924 —-and they are whole different breed of cats—-they are from the hardcore zionist jewish ‘supremacy’ pockets of Europe. It was this East European Jewish wave that started to infiltrate US government and academia. If you do the bios of the most influential US Jews you will see that 99% of them are East European……not Germans.

    The German Jews came to US in the mid 1800s and did not settle in metro ghettos, they dispersed thruout the country. The German Jews that left Germany during the run up to WWII went mainly first to France and then to South America, not the US, as immigration to the US was very restricted at that time.

    My point is….Do Not invite these Jews into your tent….these Eastern European Jews have been the ‘internationals ‘ and traveling locust herd that every country has suffered from.

  46. Art
    I agree with your sentiments re Christianity and Western civilization, and that the Alt Right and European New Right are generally not predicated on this, but rather neo-paganism and darwinism. I suppose the review could have been made a thousand words longer to address the matter. I consider the Christian foundations of the West in my own book, The Decline and Fall of Civilisations (Black House Publishing, London, 2018).

    • Replies: @SBaker
    , @Art
  47. JackOH says:

    Thanks, K. R. I wish the alt-Right folks well. We could use fresh thinking that helps solve problems. But, I’ll tell you how things look in my part of NE Ohio.

    Richard Spencer’s bid to speak at a college campus about forty miles west of me was chewed up by university pushback and legalities. Maybe he’s low on cash, maybe he found a better engagement. My Democrat Congressman is a standard-issue “liberal” carrying water for the Democrats’ national central committee. He’s in a safe seat and young enough he could still be Congressman in 2050. The Republican Congressman in the district just south of me is likewise in a safe seat.

    Their opponents have completely overlooked an astonishing alt-Rightish issue that’s in my local paper. That is the apparent deliberate corporate recruitment of 3,000 Quiche-speaking Guatemalans into a county of about 100,000 population. Many work in a meat packing plant. You don’t have to be alt-Right, redneck, or anything to raise a modest public question about how that came to be and what it means. The incumbents won’t touch it, neither will their opponents.

    There’s a local blue-collar guy who’s a big Trump fan boy. Very alert and articulate, he landed a few national interviews after Trump visited here. He’s a one-man band, though. A few local Democrats for Trump grumbled about do-nothing unions when asked why they voted Trump. There’s a prominent local woman, a Republican I think, who Black-bashed a bit when mentioning her support of Trump, and got caught by a gotcha journalist. She dialed back her statements.

    I’ll guess the midterm election will be a very rough proxy for whether President Trump has coattails, and likewise, whether the alt-Right, as I understand it, has the potential to be more than a blog ‘n’ comment gig.

  48. @Reg Cæsar

    “Prussian socialism”? I can’t think of too many things that sound more un-American.

    However, one particular shard of that political philosophy did make it to America and take root– the public school. Fat lot of good that did us.

    You don’t seem to have any idea what the term refers to. Prussian Socialism has nothing to do with schooling, public or otherwise. Its meaning, as Spengler coined it, was economic. It specifically refers to the economics of advanced, industrial societies sans ideology. By focusing on the physical facts of production and consumption rather than on the unit of account, it avoids both the waste and criminality of American oligo-capitalist cronyism and the stifling, world-alien charade of Marxism, but without falling into the Ludditism that tends to follow close on the heels of distributistism.

    There were elements of it in Mussolini’s fascism, but the heart of it delves deep into the old land values of the physiocrats and the political economy of Friedrich List.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  49. SBaker says:
    @Art

    Few people on this site will ever give credit to the impact that Christianity had in establishing western civilization.

    • Replies: @Art
  50. SBaker says:
    @K R Bolton

    I agree with you both. If we look at America and the impact Christians had in its founding the results were astounding. If we only had a complete list I would cite it, but to name just a couple, think of higher education, hospitals, the declaration of independence, ……….98% of the European founders were Christian.

  51. Miro23 says:
    @Art

    The Alt-Right has a huge problem – it is not defending Christian Western culture – the very best thing about us, is our culture – not our skin.
    We need to be defending Christianity and the culture it produced – not white skin color.

    The Christian idea is surely long gone (at least in Western Europe). The last time it was fashionable to “be received” into the (Catholic) church was probably the 1920′s.

    The religion of the 1930′s onwards was Communism with members of the intellectual elite fashionably “joining” the Party with its God (Stalin), and dogma (Marxism), to fight the Devil (Hitler) and his works (Fascism) – never mind that revolutionary Communism was just as totalitarian with its Gulags and liquidation of “class enemies”.

    The interesting thing, is that Communism has also now gone (1989 collapse of the Soviet Union), with the world’s leftists morphing into Capitalists or finding a refuge in socially destructive Counter-Cultural identity politics, or now, increasingly turning on their Neocon “friends”.

    Recommended on the Christian foundations of Europe: Christopher Dawson, “Religion and the Rise of Western Culture”.

    https://www.amazon.com/Religion-Rise-Western-Culture-Civilization/dp/0385421109/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1533476949&sr=1-1&keywords=Religion+and+the+Rise+of+Western+Culture

    • Replies: @Art
  52. Art says:
    @Miro23

    Miro23,

    Despite its many grubby preachers, priests, and potentates, Western Christianity has delivered prosperity.

    Christ’s philosophical words deliver a volitional set of ideals – these ideals actuate an ever better evolving more prosperous culture.

    These volitional ideals are – live with hope – life is sacred – love your neighbor – seek the truth – forgive the past – extend grace to all. One major aspect of their success, is that they are voluntary. Using government force to implement these ideals always backfires.

    The secular West without voluntary Christian idealism will decline into tribalness. End of story.

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Maintain Hope, Love, Truth, & Idealism — Art

    • Replies: @Miro23
  53. Mulegino1 says:

    Good point about “Fanism” and the idiocy of the professional sports camp followers- particularly the morons who follow the NFL and the NBA. A total and utter waste of mental space, and especially degenerative for the descendants of European Christendom. To think we used to look up to men like Charlemagne, Napoleon, Generals Grant and Lee, Charles Lindbergh Jr. (and senior for that matter), Nikola Tesla, Thomas Edison, Charles Dickens and Beethoven. Now any hopping and jumping dolt who can push a ball through a basket or dodge defenders somehow becomes heroic. Gresham’s Law applies to culture as well: mediocre and even criminal role models drive out good and great ones.

  54. Art says:
    @SBaker

    Few people on this site will ever give credit to the impact that Christianity had in establishing western civilization.

    SBaker,

    Exactly – it is amazing that so many good people have bought into the Jew Talmudic hateful anti-Christian agenda.

    Clearly there is something very good and prosperous about Christian culture.

    When Christianity goes haywire, is when it embraces the Jew Old Testament.

    It is not complicated, when Christians in their daily life, freely stick with the philosophical words of Jesus – things bet better.

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Maintain Hope, Life, Love, Truth, & Idealism — Art

  55. @Intelligent Dasein

    Anything ending in -ism is suspicious on its face.

    And the intensity with which East Germans practised Communism (and National Socialism and imperialism and Lutheranism before it) and now miss it puts the adjective “Prussian” under suspicion as well.

    If Spengler was simply describing an organic society, he could have come up with a more attractive name for it, couldn’t he?

    Germans and Slavs– Prussians descended from the latter as much as the former– love being told what to do. Anglo-Saxons hate it. So what’s organic and “right wing” in one culture will look very different in another.

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
  56. Miro23 says:
    @Art

    One major aspect of their success, is that they are voluntary.

    In other words it’s a Christian community, and I do think that Christian communities have a lot to offer, especially the impressive early type that was nearer to the time of Christ. They had a strong emphasis on personal ethics and family life (basically known for their honesty and reliability with Christians and non-Christians).

    Robin Lane Fox wrote a fine book about them “Pagans and Christians”. If communities like this reappeared, they would find the same kind of sleaze in the US that they encountered in the decadent and collapsing Late Roman Empire, but it was Christianity that survived and flourished while Paganism died.

    How was that? The barbarian invaders converted to Christianity and brought it back to Northern Europe and the “Eastern Christianity” of Byzantium spread through the Middle East and North to Russia.

    https://www.amazon.com/PAGANS-CHRISTIANS-Robin-Lane-Fox/dp/0394554957/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1533503380&sr=1-1&keywords=pagans+and+christians+robin+lane+fox

    • Replies: @Art
  57. Art says:
    @K R Bolton

    I agree with your sentiments re Christianity and Western civilization, and that the Alt Right and European New Right are generally not predicated on this, but rather neo-paganism and darwinism.

    K R Bolton,

    How can we defend White people without being racist? (Sorry but many of these Alt-Right people in this article come across as closet racists.)

    Clearly we must defend our culture – not our skin color.

    Christian Western culture strives for knowledge, beauty, and a wonder that leads to prosperity.

    Our science, music, art, and personal energy are unmatched elsewhere.

    All these things billions of people want.

    It is a fact that mostly White people accomplished this – we are more then willing to share.

    Think Peace — Art

  58. @Reg Cæsar

    If Spengler was simply describing an organic society, he could have come up with a more attractive name for it, couldn’t he?

    He was not describing an organic society. He was outlining a practical plan of action for the modern world, for a nation that wanted to ensure its survival in an a Period of Contending States, when the entire economic and technological means of nations would be arrayed one against another in total war.

    Spengler was and to my knowledge remains one of the only thinkers ever to address the economic and social problems of “Man and Technics” in a realistic way. That was the title of one of his books. He fully anticipated the carnage of the Second World War, and he denounced far in advance the catastrophe that would result from Western man sharing his technical expertise with non-Western races (he refer to such acts as “race-treason”). He also understood the vast social disruption that would result from advanced industrial production techniques subverting the place formerly held by “labor,” he anticipated that Communism would fall to consumer capitalism, and he foresaw the eventual cargo-culting of technology as decadent modern societies produced fewer and fewer first rate engineers who really understood the machines but masses of useless consumers who could not exist except by the productivity enabled by the machines. The entire history of the 20th and 21st centuries so far has done nothing but bear out the predictions of Spengler, so he is worth paying attention to.

    Spengler was clear-headed enough to realize that, for us who must live in this modern age, the “organic society” is only a Beatrice. It is something the contemplation of which will lead us to beauty and truth and God, but not something we can actually possess in the here and now. The brutal facts of our time demand “Prussian Socialism”—a readiness and willingness to prevail against an enemy who uses the coldest, most abstract, and most technically advanced means to lay total waste to his foes.

    The one nation in the world today actually practicing something like that is Russia. While Russia still has many problems, Vladimir Putin’s campaign against the oligarchs and the renewal of the Russian military provide a fleeting glimpse of the possibilities of Prussian Socialism in action. They are examples of the sort of deeds that must be accomplished by a Western “Caesar” in order to haul our own societies back from the brink.

  59. @Rational

    One of the problems with the alt-right is that they cannot get the air time or summon up the production values of an Anderson Cooper or an Ellen Degeneres or Oprah, whose every single show has a cost of $100,000 and includes famous guests.

    The alt-right, barring FOX, are just a bunch of guys sitting in a shoddy venue blabbing. Even Jared Taylor, whose points are quite valid, just seems to be doing his broadcasts out of his living room.

    The left has the air time, the cable channels, the vast production budget to reach the mass.

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
  60. Art says:
    @Miro23

    In other words it’s a Christian community, and I do think that Christian communities have a lot to offer, especially the impressive early type that was nearer to the time of Christ. They had a strong emphasis on personal ethics and family life (basically known for their honesty and reliability with Christians and non-Christians).

    Miro23,

    Post Roman European history is labeled as “the dark ages.” They were not dark, they were peaceful times dominated by Christianity. In truth, peaceful local Christian communities dominated Europe.

    History will repeat itself. With the end of the world dominating US Empire, the overpowering nation state will lose its appear to humanity. Like after Rome, the regional city state will reappear as the seat of organization. In this new city arrangement, all its functions will be contracted out to privately owned enterprises. Suburbs and rural governments (police, fire, roads) will be privately owned by their residents (not a subsidiary function of some vertical state power).

    The ideals of Christian philosophy will guide these cultures. The notion of force lawfully crushing bad behavior, will give way to idea of society building good idealistic community behavior.

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Maintain Hope, Life, Love, Truth, & Idealism — Art

  61. M Edward says:

    Hi Internet Friends,
    I hate to be a wet blanket or to pee on anyones parade, but the Alt-Right is controlled opposition. It is a propaganda project run out of Tel Aviv and Moscow and all of the presumed leaders are Jewish.
    I have nothing against Jews as a people, but Bolshevism and Zionism have no place in western countries. Russia is still the Soviet Union under a different flag and a different map.
    The primary purpose is to portray ant-Zionist and anti-Communists/Marxists as racist and bigots.
    Period.
    The Nazis were Marxists/Socialist. I am anti-Marxist and anti-Socialist. Therefore by default I’m anti-Nazi.
    I don’t understand the preoccupation Europeans and their ethnic bretheren around the world have with Nazis and national-socialism.
    Socialism must be stamped-out in ALL western countries.
    The Alt-Right represent Zio-Bolshevism in it’s most oppressive form.
    I hope so-called white-nationalists come to realize that promoting Nazism will get you genocided in a New York minute.
    It’s like begging to by murdered by the Zionist state apparatus.
    It’s time to move forward, not backward.

  62. @Art

    You are right. I will mention you in my rosary, good sir.

  63. @Jeff Stryker

    The left has the air time, the cable channels, the vast production budget to reach the mass.

    The Left doesn’t simply “have” these things as if they had won them in the lottery. Oprah and Ellen make big money because this is what the mass wants. Traditional conservatism—which is the ultimate wellspring of the Alt-Right even though many current Alt-Righters seem to have forgotten that—is not and cannot ever be a popular opinion. It is necessarily a sentiment held by and for elites. The real elites of the intellect, that is; not the Globalist oligarchs who also are referred to as such.

  64. You’ll find few globalist oligarchs who would live in a ghetto any sooner than a Klavern of Klansman.

  65. @Jeff Stryker

    Spencer was a National Review editor and graduate of the University of Chicago. If you aren’t impressed with his writing, your GED score probably qualifies you for a management position at a Quizno’s franchise. You don’t know anything about the Alt-Right, the coinage of the title being the sole creation of Richard Spencer himself, so why do you leave yourself open to ridicule? Are you on meds for ADHD? What’s the point of your commentary?

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  66. @Eric Novak

    “GED score”

    That’s pretty funny.

    The idea of a white ethno-state is not a new concept. Fed government would never let it happen.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.