RSS
Editor’s Note: This trial has nothing to do with Russia, but I am running this series for I have seen no other reporting from inside the courthouse which is sympathetic to the defendant, who, on the face of things, has a very strong case that he is not guilty of the charges. Unfortunately for him, he faces a clearly biased judge, dishonest and hysterical media coverage, an apparently incompetent defense team (court-appointed public defenders), and most importantly, a local jury drawn from a small, hyper-liberal town which is hot for a lynching. That the judge denied a motion to move the trial to a less biased location gives you an idea of the inequity of proceedings and the mood of the judge.
Andrew Anglin, the proprietor of the Daily Stormer, has laid out the facts of the case very well here and here. (For those of you unfamiliar with the Stormer, keep in mind that it makes liberal use of satire. It has very intelligent and spot-on analysis couched in deliberately inflammatory language. We sometimes republish their articles related to Russia, which are often excellent. You can see an archive of them here.)
As the author points out, this is an important case because it will test the US justice system – can it deliver a fair trial in such a politically and emotionally charged case? Can an impecunious, naive young white man get a fair hearing with the powers that be lined up against him? The initial signs suggest he cannot.
- Charles Bausman, Editor.
November 29, 2018. CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA.
Fifteen months after the now notorious Unite the Right rally (UTR), James Alex Fields is finally having his day in court.
Fields is facing a slate of charges including first degree murder for crashing his Dodge Challenger into a crowd in downtown Charlottesville two hours after UTR was forcibly disbursed by police. He was arrested minutes after the incident, denied bail, and has been imprisoned ever since. He has also been charged with federal hate crimes, for which he will likely face prosecution next year.
This case is important for three reasons. First, it has the potential to break the “Charlottesville Narrative.” Whether Fields is found guilty or not, the public will be deluged with facts about the Challenger incident and about UTR generally, many of which are not favorable to the leftist narrative. The left has used (and will continue to use) Charlottesville as a bludgeon against the dissident right and mainstream conservatives alike. The left is able to do so because of media mendacity and because conservatives would rather fold than fight–always ready to grovel whenever the left accuses them of “racism” or some other thought crime.
Second, the trial will be a barometer of whether United States still functions according to Rule of Law. All of the UTR attendees prosecuted so far have been convicted in ludicrously unfair proceedings, and all the “counter-protestors” have either not been charged or have received preferential treatment. The judge in the Fields case, Richard E. Moore, also presided at the trials of Jacob Goodwin, Alex Ramos and Daniel Borden. All three were convicted of malicious wounding for beating up Deandre Harris, 20, a black, after the rally.
As usual, that isn’t the whole story. Before the beating, Harris can be seen on film slamming an elderly UTR attendee with a flashlight. What was Harris’ punishment? Nothing. He was found not guilty and got to keep $160,000+ in donations given him by the liberal cyber-mob, which he appears to have used to make a rap video in which he dispenses worldly wisdom on a life in crime, drug use, and shooting people:
https://www.youtube.com/watch/?v=xdiJlRvSkQ8
Third, the outcome will affect several other key cases. One such case is Sines v. Kessler, a sprawling civil suit brought on behalf of 11 plaintiffs against every key figure and organization who participated in UTR. The suit is being argued by two New York-based law firms, Boies Schiller Flexner and Kaplan Hecker & Fink, whose ethnic composition is worth noting. The suit alleges that UTR attendees conspired to commit violence because of “hate,” “racism,” and other species of badthink. The Fields trial will also likely affect the trials of four UTR attendees who were recently arrested in California and accused of “conspiracy to riot.”
Fields faces an uphill battle. His fate will be decided by a jury of twelve (and four alternates) who are all Charlottesville residents. Suffice it to say, they are unlikely to be sympathetic. A Charlottesville jury, when presented with incontestable proof of an assault on UTR organizer Jason Kessler, decided to fine the assailant $1. The defense did file a motion in August to hold the Fields trial in a different venue, but Judge Moore denied it.
Jury selection started Monday, but was not complete until Thursday morning. Of the 16 jurors all but one is white (or Jewish/light Hispanic, perhaps). The only outlier is a middle-aged black man. There are nine women and seven men, generally older. Only 4 or 5 appeared under 40.
Prosecution Opening Statement
The prosecution isn’t pulling any punches. The facts are not on their side, so they are going in for maximum emotional effect. During her 20-minute opening statement, Senior Assistant Commonwealth’s attorney Nina Antony stressed the gruesome nature of victim’s injuries, and suggested that Fields had premeditated the whole thing, mentioning that three months before UTR, Fields had posted an image of a car running into a crowd of people on Instagram. “Fields was here in Charlottesville with anger and images of violence fixed in his mind.”
She also went to great lengths to eulogize Heather Heyer, the only person to die at the scene. The cause of her death is still disputed, as no reliable photos or video of her being struck by Fields’ car have yet emerged. But the prosecution seems confident. Ms. Antony claimed that Heyer was hit with the full force of the vehicle and that she was “lifted into the air off her feet.” Then, according to the prosecution, Fields “[took] with him her blood and flesh still on his fender.” But did Heyer die as a direct result? Heyer’s mother stated that she died of a heart attack.
The reliance on rhetorical flourish stems from a dearth of evidence. The facts are not on the prosecution’s side. Their case relies on the idea that posting an edgy picture on the Internet substantiates premeditation. This trial may well come down to an argument over what constitutes irony.
Defense blunders
The defense’s opening statement left a lot to be desired. Fields’ attorney John Hill did not contest any of the prosecution’s facts. He began by noting that the prosecutor “is correct, this is not a who-done-it case.” He went on to explain that the defense had nothing to dispute about the facts… this coming right after the rather colorful claims of the Commonwealth’s main prosecutrix. Perhaps this is tactical–a forceful defense is unlikely to carry a Charlottesville jury, especially given that they have been subjected to 15 months of the shrillest propaganda about Fields and UTR.
But the defense made two arguments that seem like a bad strategy. First, to illustrate that Fields did not come to the event intending to engage in violence, Mr. Hill argued that Fields had only brought a change of clothes; he brought no weapons, no poles, no face-mask. Sounds reasonable, all the attendees were publically instructed by the rally organizers not to bring weapons. But watch for the prosecution to turn this argument on its head: that Fields brought no baggage specifically because he intended to carry out a car attack. Why bring a toothbrush when you are committed to murder and mayhem?
Second, Mr. Hill argued that Fields did not “flee” the scene, he merely “left.” This line seems intended to fight the charge of fleeing the scene. But does he really expect the jury to see a distinction? Moreover, it undermines Fields’ main argument: that he felt endangered and acted in self defense. How could he have felt that he was in danger before the car crash, but that he didn’t feel scared enough to flee after his car hit a mass of people who then smashed out his windows? It is totally illogical. The easiest application of the self-defense argument is in relation to the people who were injured when Fields sped away in reverse–many of them were attacking his car with bats and sticks. Why on earth would his lawyer argue that he was NOT fleeing?
However, Hill did provide some useful details about Fields’ activities and interactions in the two hours between the time when UTR was forcibly (and illegally) dispersed and when the car crash happened. Fields left Lee Park by walking west–the safer way–and returned to the UTR staging ground at McIntyre Park. He went back to his car at the McDonald’s up the road (presumably this one). At the Shell gas station across the street, he met three other UTR attendees, who needed to get back to their cars, all parked in the still-dangerous downtown. Fields volunteered to give them a lift back to their cars. Dropping them off, Fields and his new acquaintances resolved to meet up later for lunch.
The Stakes
If Fields is found guilty, he faces life in prison and even the death penalty. There is immense political pressure to convict Fields. Judge Moore has shown himself a consistent persecutor of his city’s political enemies, while turning a benevolent eye toward the real criminals: the anarchists, black thugs, and degenerates who successfully denied UTR attendees the right to free assembly and free speech.
If Moore continues in this vein, he is only finishing the job started by the Charlottesville Mayor, city council and police department, in collusion with the Virginia State Police and, no doubt, more senior elements. The fault was theirs, whether by negligence or device. This is not a groundless theory, but the findings of the independent report of Timothy Heaphy, the former (and Obama-appointed) US Attorney for the Western District of Virginia.
Should Fields be found not guilty, the authorities know that they will have to contend with a maelstrom leftist outrage, as other jurisdictions across America are all too familiar. From Ferguson to Portland, Berkeley to Washington DC, the forces of radical decline have scarred the face of our nation.
If only our leaders had the will to rule.
Note: Quotes are based on notes taken in court the morning of 29 November, 2018. I do not know shorthand, and at times the attorneys spoke quickly or inaudibly. There may be some minor mistakes in transcription, but the overall tone and substance is true.
He’s entitled to a fair trial. I’m surprised it wasn’t moved. The jury pool has clearly been saturated by inflammatory information about the case.
With that said, I wouldn’t accept Anglin and the Daily Stormer at face value. He’s too skilled a propagandist to fit with the supposed community college/ OSU dropout background.
Is anyone down there talking about anything like the ‘sudden emergency’ doctrine?
Why does Alex Fields just have a public defender?
Surely we have resources enough to hire a respectable local defense attorney.
Uh oh, Brett better run and hide.
I have seen Fields car damaged rear. My question is when the damage happened. Was he breaking before accident, or it did happen when he was backing?
Naturally if the damage happened when he was breaking and following car run into him then Field is totally innocent.
goofball in the photo looks like he’s straight out of Deliverance
Solid piece by Greg, hope to see more first-hand coverage like this. One has to wonder who organized these leftist groups who freely marched for hours after Terry McAuliffe’s govt declared a state of emergency and the lawfully permitted rallygoers had gone. Also, pics of said “prosecutrix” needed, thx.
I’m impressed by Mr. Favre for the USS Liberty mention.
What is the goyim defense league? I’ve never heard of it.
What is the moral of this story?
The public defender who is representing the defendant knows full well that he will suffer tremendous repercussions from his peers if he was to accidentally win this case despite what appears to be his best efforts to deliberately throw it. I guarantee that his fellow civil servants have already made these threats quite clear to him and in no uncertain terms.
Public defenders (not the sharpest tacks in the legal box) are usually known for their excessive plea bargaining in order to avoid the extra work that goes along with actual jury trials. This results in many or most public defender having comparatively little or no experience with a trial before an actual jury. Judges go along with this perversion of justice simply because they are usually as lazy as the public defenders and only want to clear out their court docket as quickly as possible. Fields’ public defender already hates him simply because of all the extra work this case is causing him.
David Boies, the lead attorney in the case against Jason Kessler, is probably one the most expensive
lawyers on the east coast and will even take up a case if it doesn’t pay him his $2000+ hourly fee (like he is rumored to have gotten for successfully arguing the case for gay marriage before the US supreme court). I am willing to bet that Boies is probably also advising the prosecution in the case against Fields.
To my knowledge, none the supposed leadership of the alt-right ever mentioned setting up a defense fund for Fields ( despite a lot of their loud grandstanding ) to pay for ANY private attorney, even a cheap one just out of law school. Any relatively impartial attorney that wasn’t also a government employee.
Thanks for this, Greg. It’s great to see you’re here at unz.com.
That pretty much says all we need to know about the judge.
The public will be deluged with nothing of the kind. The public will be deluged with anti-white propaganda, same as on every other day of the year.
It’s worth repeating that only one side needed a permit to protest–got the permit–and were then assaulted by illegal violent thugs who apparently didn’t need any permits at all, but instead were protected and facilitated by ‘public safety’ officers.
Let’s please not pretend that this trial is any kind of measure of ‘justice’ in today’s USA. That ship sailed long ago.
It would be about time that the wider “movement” get involved and hire him a good defense attorney.
But as far as I remember, most figureheads found it more tactically expedient to distance themselves from the Charlottesville car incident as much as possible back when the details were largely unknown. Beside obvious pecuniary consideration, might cynical political tactics have something to do with why he doesn’t receive more help?
I am, of course, grasping, as the reasons are most likely practical. Most figureheads who could start a drive for donations seem to be involved in their own legal quagmires right now, so they’re resources are already stretched too thin for a case of this magnitude.
He’s a soft studies professor LARPing as a redneck as a show of solidarity or something.
I wonder how, after O J Simpson was acquitted, anyone can have any confidence in the USA trial by jury system.
All, as far as I know, Dutch judges and lawyers after the OJ Simson show agreed, in the Dutch system without juries he would have been convicted.
USA juries consist of, on average, citizens with low IQ.
As far as I understand, anyone with a job or business of some importance can avoid becoming a juror.
Already some 20 years ago I discussed the different legal systems in the USA.
The one and only argument for the jury system seems to be that judges can be bribed, and, the assertion ‘it is better to be judged by your peers’.
My statement that Dutch judges cannot be bribed was not believed.
As it happens, by coincidence, I knew personally quite a few Dutch judges, knew, some died already.
I’m convinced that Dutch judges cannot be bribed.
What the Charlotteville trial is about I do not quite understand.
It is not contested, as far as I understand, that the accused drove his car into a group of people deliberately.
One woman died, cause of death not quite clear.
So what is the trial, I’m not a lawyer, I suppose just the choice between premeditated murder and severely injuring people.
Premeditated murder cannot be proved, I understand, this leaves severely injuring people, maybe aggravated by the asserted intention of killing people.
Race, my view, has nothing to do with it.
We had a somewhat similar case just now in the Netherlands, anti Black Pete demonstrators stopped by blocking a highway for reaching their destination.
The judge made it quite clear that the trial had nothing to do with Black Pete, just with blocking a highway, endangering traffic, preventing that the right of demonstration could be used.
What would have happened in this case with a jury system, a lot of political fuss, I suppose.
College town full of and run by N-Words. What can one expect. That’s the problem with Portland Portland; few N-Words, but other than Nike headquarters the main business of Portland is colleges and all the perpetual students and hangers on who are anti fa White haters .
I know White southerners love the south but how can you stand them, especially now they have such political and AA government worker power? I read The Guardian article about the Mississippi senate race. One would think Hitler instead of a White woman won the election. The European liberal hatred of White southerners is blatant.
Remember the Duke Lacrosse fiasco.A White DA decided to prosecute them even though the police investigators decided the accusation was unfounded. The so called victim is now in prison for murder. White Duke professors and staff went on a year long hate rampage.
We are a diseased, horrible race destroying ourselves.
Antifa with red scarves looks to be an officially state sanctioned embryonic wannabe ‘Red Guards’ on standby to enact a Chinese style ‘cultural revolution’ circa 1966 – 68 in the United States.
Xie Fuzhi, the national police chief, said it was “no big deal” if Red Guards were beating “bad people” to death.
Murder, torture, and humilation, were all part of the ‘cultural revolution’.
In August and September 1966, there were 1,772 people murdered in Beijing alone.
Nothing was sacred. Statues, grave sites, places of worship, were desecrated and destroyed.
Many famous temples, shrines, and other heritage sites in Beijing were attacked.
By the summer of 1968 the Red Guards were no longer needed by the establishment which had officially fostered them, and were disgarded and suppressed, some forcibly so in the same manner as Robespierre and the Old Bolsheviks.
Antifa people should take note.
At the same time the PLA carried out mass executions of Red Guards in Guangxi province…Mao, the Chairman informed them gently of the end of the [Red Guard] movement with a tear in his eye..
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Guards
Thank you for this report.
The problem with American judges is not ordinary bribery although it does happen. The problem is that the law schools were taken over by pro criminal White hating communist Jews starting about 100 years ago and completed by 1950. Affirmative action for leftist women and black judges made things worse as most black and many women judges are hard left and pro criminal.
How a long term criminal court judge can see the same thugs year after year and still go out of their way to stretch laws and procedure to favor them is beyond belief.
I read that the Dutch railways are to pay reparations to Israel because the Germans used the railroad during the war. Soon Israel will demand reparations from the water sanitation street gas and electric agencies because the Germans used those services too. Next they will sue the farm cooperatives and associations because Germans ate Dutch raised food during the occupation.
American jurors aren’t low IQ. The laws exempting people from jury duty because of their important jobs are long gone. Important business is no excuse.
Lots of lawyers have jury duty. Even former president Obama was called for jury duty in Chicago. He didn’t serve in a jury but he showed up and chatted with the other prospective juries.
In my experience the more educated also known as brainwashed jurors are much more inclined to be lenient with black criminals and find them innocent no matter how much evidence that they are guilty.
The entire print and TV media in America is pro black criminal. It’s only on the internet and among law enforcement that you’ll find people who know the truth about black crime.
you wrote:
“With that said, I wouldn’t accept Anglin and the Daily Stormer at face value. He’s too skilled a propagandist to fit with the supposed community college/ OSU dropout background.”
you may have a point…he is the best humorist out there..how did he get to be that way?
and in the same vein, why is patrick little still on youtube?
Here’s a book you’ll enjoy. It’s about corrupt judges in the most corrupt county in the country, Cook County Illinois in which is the most corrupt city Chicago.
Author Robert Cooley is a former criminal defense attorney who won almost all his cases because he just bribed the judges. In our system, there are preliminary hearings before a jury trial. The defense always asks the judge to just dismiss the case in these hearings. That’s all he did, just give the judge a bribe and ask for a dismissal.
Cooley also tells how the organized crime mafia criminals influenced the elections and re elections of judges. Cooley was a corrupt police officer before he became a corrupt lawyer and relates police corruption. One police officer he knew had a part time job. The part time job was murdering people for the mafia.
The book reinforces every negative stereotype about Chicago and Cook County.
Book is When Corruption Was King by Robert Cooley and Hillel Levin. Carroll & Graf Publishers 2004. I’m sure you can find it on Amazon.
He drove his car in to a crowd of people. People were injured. One died. Heart attack or not, having been struck by a car at a highly charged event such as Charlottesville could lead to a heart attack.
The young man made two mistakes. One, he was naive enough to go a UTR rally, as if a rally can change the course of politics and save us from ourselves. Two, he drove in to a crowd of people. He should have known better than to drive his car in to such an event. His judgement is way off.
I believe it was fear that caused him to panic and crash in to a crowd. But it’s no excuse. He could have left his car home that day.
Does he deserve life? Not in my opinion. Six months of creative punishment, a working sentence, should do the trick.
Frankly, the kid isn’t too bright. Nor are protesters on either side of the divide. True change doesn’t start at stupid rallies.
It starts inside the home.
I think you’re right.
I presume Ajax Amsterdam the football club of Dutch Nazis WHO PROVIDED A LIST OF THEIR JEWISH MEMBERS to the liberators WITHOUT BEING ASKED will be throwing in a few guilders as well?
Yeah, for purported non-PC “truthtellers” the alt-right is still prone to movement-politics, denial, and groupthink.
Heather Heyer is the fault of James Fields. Even if she died of a heart attack and not from injuries from the vehicle impact, the triggering event for the heart attack was the car ramming into Antifa.
And James Fields happened because of poor operational security and messaging by the alt-right. The Stormers claim to be satirists, but it has been one long slippery slope for them and their lying leader.
FYI, rumor is that Greg Conte and Richard Spencer split after Conte caught Spencer in a three-some with Conte’s girlfriend.
Is it safe to assume that the Dutch legal system and law schools are not completely dominated by Jews? In the USA, you are more likely to find an impartial jury than an impartial judge.
There’s no proof chain-smoking hamplanet Heyer was hit by anything other than early onset congestive heart failure.
I’m sure Brett was just being trolled by someone. He seems to be reading off what he said. I doubt he was familiar with either the Goyim Defense League or the USS Liberty.
Look into Know More News on Youtube. Adam Green started it.
lol!
No, you don’t Remember the Jews stole all your money or something?
” I read that the Dutch railways are to pay reparations to Israel because the Germans used the railroad during the war. ”
I read that too.
In this respect nothing amazes me any more.
Do not know what it is, running out of camp guards who can be prosecuted, and/or that a substantial part of the Dutch, one third, or even two third, have no idea whatsoever about WWII, and holocaust.
I’m getting the impression that all these holocaust remembrance clubs are mainly convincing themselves that what they do have effect.
I don’t know, seems to me a free citizen should have the right to attend a peaceful demonstration without having to worry about being attacked by violent communists protected by the local government, no? Also seems to me that if an angry crowd is hunting people down with baseball bats, a reasonable person should be allowed to drive as fast and hard as possible to avoid being attacked.
Are you people too stupid to watch a video? No there was no damage on his car when he killed Heather Heyer.
I read that book and it was fascinating! Especially how they were going to kill him. Boy was Pat Marcy powerful.
The difference between that Italian mafia and our current “legal mafia” is the old mob broke laws and the new Jewish mob has the laws changed to suit their whims. And the old mob would kill you but the new “legal criminals” will just ruin you. And the FBI decimated the old mafia but is now an arm of the Jewish mob in America.
From this side of the Atlantic it is difficult to form an opinion about the USA judicial system.
Books and tv series galore about corrupt policmen, judges, persecutors, politicians.
But even in our own country it is difficult to get an idea about integrety, honesty, etc.
I happen to have known, completely privately, such as a judge who might have become my father in law, an neighbour, former colleague, quite a few judges.
Any of them were/are in my opinion capable men, honest, could not be bought.
Dutch judges judge one another, informally.
Remember one perjury case, a judge who had caused a small traffic incident, lied under oath about the profile of the tyres of his car.
He was not caught officially, but his colleagues were not lenient.
What they did exactly, I was never told.
My idea about the USA jury system is negative, but as I said, I just know it from novels and tv series.
Let me add that Dutch judges are not infallible, also here innocent people are convicted, but, as we do not have the death penalty, mistakes can, to some extent, be put right.
Not unimportant, in the Dutch system appeal is always possible, though it may take years before a procedure in appeal comes to an end.
Right exists, most of the time, for those with money and pateince.
The idea to justify ramming a car into a crowd of people out of “fear” or “self defense” is hard to digest. But I guess anything is possible in extraordinary circumstances.
With the terrible Antifa thugs, with guns and battering rams foaming out of their mouths chasing you..
Well, here goes this theory down the drain;
Judging by this video he is driving mostly empty street into the crowd. He wasn’t boxed in with no way to run. No armies of Antifa thugs behind him, no battering rams or guns in sight. His car is in pristine condition prior to the collision with the crowd so it wasn’t beaten up before!? Who is he running from in panic trying to save his bacon?
And are we supposed to have some sympathy for this madman because one of his victims was obese and smoked?
The picture this article is trying to paint looks false to me. I don’t have a clue if this nut-case is going to get a fair trial. Honestly I can’t say I really care, his victims didn’t.
What I don’t get is how defending this guy is going to further or improve the cause of the alt-right or any cause for that matter?
I guess I need to read the transcript but sounds like Fields’ defense attorneys are merely going through the motions and just want to get this over with which guarantees he’ll be found guilty. Seemingly no mention of the Heapy report proving a city and police conspiracy to harm the UtR rallygoers, the terroristic threats made against Fields by inbred leftist retard Dwayne Dixon just prior to the crash or the fact that Fields’ car impacted another because he was fleeing a violent left wing mob.
The evidence clearly shows that Fields was in fight or flight mode and trying to save his own life as any reasonable person would do and not, contrary to the dishonest left wing prosecutor, channeling his inner Mohammed on his way out of the outhouse that some call Charlottesville, VA.
Similar to how Silicon Valley is nullifying the first amendment for wrongthinkers, municipalities controlled by the far left are nullifying the Bill of Rights for wrong thinkers and non-leftists like Fields and others. Charlottesville is leading the way.
Trump, the Republican party and conservatism, inc. don’t have the will to rule so won’t fight these culture wars since they accept the media’s narrative that the UtR defendants are too far to the right and too controversial to receive recognition for their plight or a fair trial. As such, white racialists are under no obligation to observe laws or recognize courts since these have been weaponized for use against the (((left’s))) enemies.
how about you do it, Mr. Moneybags
May 22, 2017 The Inconvenient Truth About the Democratic Party
Did you know that the Democratic Party defended slavery, started the Civil War, founded the KKK, and fought against every major civil rights act in U.S. history? Watch as Carol Swain, professor of political science at Vanderbilt University, shares the inconvenient history of the Democratic Party.
he was naive enough to think this was still America, where people had the right to Free Speech
the funny part is, i hear she’s a GOPe RINO at best – another Uniparty sellout
don’t stoop to self-flattery, jilles
here you sound like an idiot – there’s nothing special about Dutch judges
Charlottesville is an interesting place.
Located at Charlottesville is the University of Virginia established by the wealthy plantation residing and slave owning Thomas Jefferson. Just outside the city is his home Monticello where Jefferson is buried.
Jefferson, as the author of the 1776 American Declaration of Independence, was a Founding Father of the Capitalist United States. This is the same nascent US which in 1776 had the multinational corporation British East India Company flag (identical to the Grand Union flag) flying over it to symbolize its Capitalist revolution.
In this, Jefferson the person, like Charlottesville the place, is interesting.
As Thomas Jefferson, a Founding Father of the Capitalist 1776 Revolution, was also a Founding Father of the 1789 Communist French Revolution.
The French Revolution it will be recalled had its ‘Commune’, ‘Whites’, ‘counter-revolutionaries’, and mass executions, from which the Communist Soviet Union and Red China would evolve. Paris, the 1789 Revolution’s capital, accordingly has a city square today named ‘Stalingrad’ to honor that city’s Communist defenders.
Groups such as Antifa would also evolve from the 1789 French Communist Revolution.
Jefferson, as the American representative in France during the latter 1780′s and a firm supporter of the French Revolution, was the acting ‘consultant’ for fellow Capitalist revolutionary Lafayette and one additional Frenchmen in the writing of the Declaration of the Rights of Man.
The Rights of Man is considered a core statement of the values of the Communist French Revolution.
So, should it be that the US Capitalist establishment allows for Antifa to go the route of a full blown Maoist Red Guard style cultural revolution in America, when they come upon Jefferson’s grave at Monticello outside Charlottesville, will the Antifa tear down his monument and desicrate his grave by digging up his mouldering corpse as was done in China?
Or..
Perhaps more appropriately on their part considering the actual history of these things, will Antifa cry out in unison ‘Father!!’ at the sight of the Capitalist slave owner Thomas Jefferson’s grave, hang their heads in shame, and go home?
‘..rather than it [the French Revolution] should have failed, I would have seen half the earth desolated..’
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_the_Rights_of_Man_and_of_the_Citizen
https://www.eutouring.com/place_de_la_bataille_de_stalingrad_square.html
https://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/french-revolution
During the preliminary hearing on December 14, 2017, defense attorney Denise Lunsford caused Detective Steven Young to testify that James Fields’s shirt was stained with urine when Fields was arrested. See the preliminary hearing’s transcript, page 40.
Before Lunsford thus had revealed that Fields’ shirt was stained with urine, Lunsford had established that Fields had spent time with three other witnesses who saw Fields before he drove into downtown Charlottesville. I assume that all three witnesses say that Fields’ shirt was not stained with urine when he drove into downtown Charlottesville.
It should be clear to this trial’s jury that someone threw urine onto Fields, while he was sitting in his car, right before Fields began driving toward the crowd of counter-protesters.
On my blog, I have published a series of articles about the Charlottesville incident.
Once Alex Fields is executed we can turn our attention to people like Greg Cunte.
Really. The alt-right are a bunch of impoverished rednecks who can’t keep employment. It’s weird to expect them to be able to mount any kind of monetary defense.
There’s more to this whole “holocaustianity” business…
The latest jewish “holocaust” swindle is that of “holocaust transference syndrome” where (only) jewish “holocaust” memories are transferred to their children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and even to unrelated jewish persons. This claim by two jewish psychiatrists is gaining traction among jewish “holocaust” promoters in order to “keep the dream alive” and to “keep the reparations and shekels flowing”. You see, these children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and other unrelated jewish individuals are also seen as jewish “holocaust” survivors, worthy of reparations and special treatment.
When will it end?
If jews have their way…NEVER
“Defense blunders”
I do not understand why Americans continue to believe that the “public defender” is somehow working for the defendant. The “public defender” is an officer of the court. His job is not to help the defendant with a competent defense. His job is not to help the defendant win.
The “public defender’s” job is to make sure that the defendant’s rights are not violated at trial so that the defendant does not have an appealable case.
The “public defender’s” job is to make sure the conviction will not be overturned.
James Alex Fields’ trial is a dog and pony show for America’s viewing enjoyment.
Fields is a ward of the court, a legal incompetent, a child, unable to handle his own legal affairs. How do we know? We know because he is “represented by” John Hill.
Of course John Hill “had nothing to dispute about the facts”. Hill’s job is to help the show trial end with an unappealable conviction.
Welcome to America.
☮
If you have ever been near a criminal court you would know that in many cases the public defender is better than 80% of the garbage lawyers who infest the place. The problem is that top 20% are extremely expensive.
I once talked to one of those firms – 15,000 just to represent you up to the preliminary hearing on a felony charge. Then by the hour after that. The prosecution knows that and uses it.
yes, apparently there is a website where you can pay celebrities $500 and more to read some few sentences you want them to
considering all the money Favre has made over his career (well over $100 million) its sad to see him resort to this
Judging by this video he is driving mostly empty street into the crowd. He wasn’t boxed in with no way to run.
From other sources he didn’t have other ways to go. He was forced by the thugs to go down the street where the Antifa crowd was. If all the access routes are cut off but one, there is no place else to go. He could have gotten out of his car and ran but when he got back his car would have been torched. What would you do?
His car was hit from behind (several times), just before he accelerated.
Yes, comrade. I agree. Our comrades in the DOJ and FBI are doing well. We must continue to work with them.
Are you so smart that you can’t see the armed mob terrorizing people all over the city?
It’s quite possible Fields had some sort of medical incident prior to this. I mean hell, an Orthodox Jew in NYC just killed someone after putting his car in reverse and driving 30 mph backwards down the street. He claimed he was trying to parallel park. He got a summons for his troubles and is free pending a hearing.
Take a look at the very end of the video when he is backing out. The street is empty behind him. Where did the crowd chasing him go?
Was he hit from behind?
Rear end of the car seems intact to me. If you guys have more videos or other evidence – please post them.
BTW – I would burn down my car and my truck and my boat before ramming a crowd of innocent people with any of them.
To me this video shows deliberate attack. His only defense is insanity.
if that makes you feel better, sure
btw, here’s Dwayne Dixon, confronted by someone with a camera over his waving a gun at Fields – watch Dwayne panic and run:
Red Ice TV
Yeah, smoking caused her early onset heart failure. Idiot
I am irritated by all of the false images of Heather Heyer.
She was a fat sow.
So, standby for the whale
MAN THE HARPOONS!
Why does Red Elephant insist that Favre has no idea what he is talking about? Is it because he was a stupid football player (although q’backs are supposed to be the smart ones)? Maybe he’s suffered one too many concussions? Is it impossible to believe that Favre is an actual patriot instead of a paid shill for a group that I never heard of before? Is he, an independently wealthy multi-millionaire (unless he’s gambled away all his money), willing to say something he doesn’t believe in for a few lousy shekels?
I live near Atlanta. The anti-white government policy is open and commonplace. There were stories of city council meetings where black members would openly say, “You ain’t bringing your white blah blah in here!” Forget about getting a white mayor. I remember a few elections ago, there was a black man running who had a white WIFE. I remember the media stories that ran: “How could he understand our struggle with his WHITE WIFE?” Every election, some group runs ads about how, “If you elect X, he’ll put you back in CHAINS!”
That and they keep going to prison. No use denying it. It’s why you’re crying like a bitch.
OTOH, this could be the ONE chance these lowly public defenders have to make a name for themselves. Imagine if they actually get him off? (I know that’s a HUGE stretch). Their services could be in big demand as they lose that hick town for the big bucks that await. Hey, if Johnny Cochran can get OJ off…?
Video of the moments leading up to the collision:
Yes, that’s exactly what I said, cigarettes did it. Moron.
I just re-watched the scene of the accident, immediately after he hits the crowd about ten guys with baseball bats jump out and start assaulting his car. You can see it on any video you watch. The question would be, where was the local softball field and how did this group of weekend ballplayers just suddenly appear out of nowhere?
If you would be willing to be pulled out of your car and beaten to death, or into severe injury, which has happened on many occasions, (see Reginald Denny), that says a lot about you.
As I recall Fields collided with a car in front of his whereupon antifags began damaging his car and smashing the rear window and passenger side front window in an attempt to get into the car and physically harm Fields. This proves that he was driving through extremely hostile territory. This forced Fields to back up and hit more snarling left wing terrorists to get out of a dire situation or die or face serious injury.
This video leaves those critical pieces out which is no accident.
If Fields was hell bent on killing people with his car there were several opportunities to do so before this actual event. Hell, he could have just stayed in his car during the rally and started clipping the violent left wing counter protestors or started mowing people down on the sidewalks immediately after the rally. But he didn’t. Not only that the police are on record as stating that Fields was totally unaware that anyone died as a result of his actions and showed remorse.
But like all leftists you’re going to take liberties with the actual facts and infer malign intent because you don’t like James Field’s politics.
CGI recreation of crash based on official sources:
Not sure which video you mean. Link? The ones I’ve seen do not capture the vehicle before it begins to accelerate down the side street toward Heyer and the other marchers. Given the generally violent scene and Antifa people with clubs around the question arises whether anyone was threatening Fields or pounding on his car before he took off toward the place were Heyer was marching.
My impression is that Fields car turned onto a side street from the street that runs past the parking garage. I believe Charlottesville has a lot of video cameras around the parking garage and I’m wondering if any of them captured anything relevant to the cause of his accelerating toward the Mall.
This a terrible mish-mosh.
I do not have all day to answer this, (unless UNZ chooses to hire me – at a Living Wage, (plus free beer)??? I guess not; so I’ll just have some fun – briefly.
It’s [S's) main purpose appears to support the Zionist New World Order narrative that:
1. All revolution is bad.
2. America (and its founders are/were evil) - not to mention - Straight White Males.
3. Most of the (Founders') ideals (which implies-all of their ideals), are incorrect.
4. Thomas Jefferson was evil (as the Zionists liquidators of America insist). Mr. Gorbachev, tear down those statues. Replace with one of Liberace, or Tiny Tim.
5. Capitalists are Communists. - So what is all the fighting about?
I quote - at nausea:
"Jefferson, as the American representative in France during the latter 1780′s and a firm supporter of the French Revolution, was the acting ‘consultant’ for fellow Capitalist revolutionary Lafayette and one additional Frenchmen in the writing of the Declaration of the Rights of Man."
" The Rights of Man is considered a core statement of the values of the Communist French Revolution."
Point #5 above "Capitalists are Communists." Even my students have gotten beyond this.
We don't want that "Rights of Man" stuff. Because:
"The Rights of Man is considered a core statement of the values of the Communist French Revolution."
Yipes!
1. There has been NO "Communist French Revolution." Have I missed something here? Hollande, Macon, Henri Bernard Levy? All 3 Rothschild puppets, and Mr. Macon (the man married to his grandmother), is a former Rothschild Bank Employee, have exchanged leadership roles of the French Puppet Government. Dieudonné, and Soral, are proscribed, not allowed to visit America, Britain, practically under House arrest. Marine le Pen, the leader of the French Opposition, is threatened with confinement in an Asylum.
2. I do not know about you; but no one here, specially me, wants any of this "Rights of Man."
Lafayette. I am not coming! Life, liberty, the Pursuit of Property-(Locke), later expanded by the 'Communist' Jefferson, to the "pursuit of Happiness." Too hot for me.
3. We don't want none of that happiness stuff! A little property, maybe some of Palestine (Hell! All of Palestine - from the Euphrates to the Nile). But, definitely, NO HAPPINESS!
The Vicodin is wearing off. I'll leave you with this.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles
I have no idea who wrote this. Might have been one of those "Commie" Founding Fathers.
Boy! one of them could write!
I'm with Sartre, I think, therefore; I might be alive! This is what I think!
Trotsky and JF Kennedy were murdered.
God Bless America!
God Bless our Republic! [as soon as we restore it]
Durruti
its true, the right is being selectively prosecuted by corrupt government, both in Virginia and on a nationwide level
actually you’re the one that seems emotionally upset
Feilds (and others) fell into a trap set by Terence Richard McAuliffe and local authorities. The purpose of staged events at Charlottesville was to equate protesters and white people in general with Nazis.
Don’t even speak of justice in this has been country. It does not exist. Before you decide to participate in a public political event understand that your civil liberties only exist on paper and that you cannot expect the police to protect you from violence.
Just because they are public defenders, how could you say that Fields’ attorneys are “merely going through the motions?” You don’t know that. The case just started Friday after 4 days of jury selection (if I have my dates right) and the prosecution always goes first. His attorneys, in the perhaps unlikely event they get Fields off, will have made a big name for themselves, their services would be in demand, and the money will follow. It’s David vs Goliath, but sometimes David wins.
lol. The crash is on video, but sure, let’s go with a Nazi recreation. You guys are beyond stupid.
I wish one of you brain-dead Nazis would actually get a law degree and defend this guy. “Your honor, he had to drive at high speed through a crowd because someone spit on his car earlier in the day.”
I presume no crowd-funding platforms will be allowed to raise money for Fields’ defense but I would absolutely kick in should one appear. I don’t think I’ve got the stomach to watch this kid get railroaded and maybe do life for the “crime” of defending his life against a masked and armed mob attacking his car en masse after being set up to do so by the local cops and politicians.
This right here is where the rubber meets the road. I fully expect the usual suspects – everyone from the NYT to the cable-news scuttlefish up to and including the UK’s utterly heinous Guardian to either ignore, dismiss or shamelessly distort what coverage there is. We’ll see now if Fox News or Breitbart or any would-be libertarian, paleoconservative or civil-liberties news/commentary venues besides the already-marginalized samizdat sources will put their money where their mouths are. But I tender them all the same warning: you may choose to join the jeering mob, or sit silent and say nothing (just as bad), and play the percentages that, later on, no one is going to remember or care enough to sort through the mountain of noise and garbage to sort the truth from lies and the patriots from the blue-haired agents of chaos and anarchy; but you’re wrong. Stand with the Bolshevik mob – even (especially) the ones with six and seven-figure incomes – and your treason will follow you for the rest, and to the end, of your days.
Defending our Republic from anarchists in masks is both your birthright and your responsibility as an American citizen. I urge you not to look into your heart, where the America of Howard Zinn and George Soros resides – but instead to read our Constitution, and then the Federalist Papers, and to do the right thing: acquit Fields of all charges before this totalitarian madness tears our country to shreds.
In the present climate a name attorney who defended Fields would be taking a risk since a lot of people would condemn him and attempt to punish him in some way. Your best chance would be to get someone with outstanding liberal/left credentials like Alan Dershowitz. Good luck with that.
I watched that Red Ice video yesterday. It’s a long one, and sure shows compelling evidence that Fields, who just seems to be a lonely guy who went to the rally for some like-minded companionship, had no intention to harm anyone. If anything, he was just guilty of stupidity for driving his new found friends back into the dangerous city to get their cars, after which he got lost on Charlottesville’s many one-way streets. I hope the defense lawyers watch this video. Too bad they probably can’t present it in court.
Someone getting prosecuted for driving into a crowd and killing someone could only be considered “selective” by morons.
i don’t believe it was staged but it does seem likely that the left was prepared for this, even down to having a fake right-winger showing up with a swastika flag so the (((media))) could take many photos of him.
I agree that the goal since then has been to label the event (with the help of jew media) as a Nazi or White Supremacist happening even though i bet less than 10% of those who showed up actually espouse those views. Most who showed up probably just wanted the damn border and immigration laws enforced and the illegal aliens and Visa overstayers removed.
which is it, “they” or one?
you’re dishonest too, i see
Do you actually know any lawyers or law students?
Greg has a long history of stirring up trouble between White men and women. I hope that doesn’t continue.
Even a black leftist is nixed for criticizing Israel.
Marc Lamont Hill get fired by CNN
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BW3KUAUMe5E/
Sounds like a pretty important point, but I didn’t see it expanded upon in the article. Also, the “military-grade assault rifle” phrase channels Dianne Feinstein.
Find the video showing his car clubbed on the left rear just before accelerating.
The main lesson to be learned from the C-ville incident is that police should keep protestors and counter-protestors apart. Things were bound to happen.
Fields is a tragic figure in many respects. His father died in a car accident before he was born, and he was raised by his paraplegic mother. He was being treated for psychological issues. There was no strong parent figure to grab him by the lapels and get his thinking straight. The two sides were provoking each other all day, there was a predictable flash of anger, and two lives have been ended or ruined.
Consider the clubbing to the left rear of the car.
Sammich.
Well?
In every case the fat pig was jaywalking!!!!
Really?
When he rams into the crowd his car is intact. Only after the horrific collision is his car beaten with bats by guys that obviously were right there – in the very crowd he ran into. Honestly can you blame them?
Around the 55 sec mark in this video one can see empty street behind him as far as can be seen. This is where he was coming from. Where is the army of thugs scaring the poor bastard to try to “escape” through the crowd at 20-30 mph. The only reason he didn’t injure or kill many more people is because he hit the cars inside the crowd.
I have no idea what was happening inside his head – if anything moments before he hit the crowd – but this looks really bad for him. Insanity at best.
Reduce the emotion, C2, and let’s see what remains, if anything.
Your video animation study at #69 is a helpful contribution, fnn. I’d elsewhere seen the clubbing of Fields’ Dodge at its left rear, prior to advancing toward the impact, but wasn’t aware of the near-simultaneous blow from the right, both of them prior to the impact. Neither was I aware of Dixon exhibiting his rifle at the side of the street prior to the two clubbings of the Dodge.
Pointing out the low speed both prior and subsequent to the two clubbings is also relevant.
Again, where was the softball game? Why are so many of your people strolling through Charlottesville with baseball bats and magically appear after the accident? Can you get off your ideological horse for 10 seconds and see that there was more to this than just some maniac driving into a crowd? The police encouraged a riot, allowed armed groups to rampage through the streets, and in the midst of the mayhem, someone died. The police chief and mayor should be on trial for causing this death.
Here is another video
Charlottesville Reconstructed: See it from James Field’s Point of View!
also 4chan/pol has a lot of good research
/pol/ – Politically Incorrect » Searching for posts with the subject ‘charlottesville’.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/subject/charlottesville/
Yes, there seem to be many parallels. Antifa is a Red Guard with political power, supported by the media and backed by millions so convinced they are justified in fighting the Four Olds, or in this case “hate,” that they don’t notice they have also destroyed the rule of law. Selective justice is no justice.
We will all suffer as our country is destroyed, but those gleefully helping bring it about apparently believe the consequences will not apply to them as well.
Thanks for the post.
As if the authorities didn’t know that already. It was a deliberate decision to let the two sides “fight it out.”
https://www.npr.org/2018/08/02/634890750/in-the-wake-of-charlottesville-journalist-begins-documenting-hate-in-america
https://dailycaller.com/2017/12/05/media-hero-needs-to-answer-for-charlottesville-police-failure/
https://vdare.com/posts/charlottesville-narrative-collapse-heaphy-confirms-sam-dickson-police-told-let-them-fight-it-out
I agree generally. I myself don’t understand how anyone could claim reasonable knowledge of Fields’ state of mind at the time of the accident, under the circumstances. However, the case seems to hinge on proving that Field did act with malice aforethought. I wonder whether denial of the change in venue constitutes grounds for an appeal. Maybe that’s when a serious crowdfunding campaign will begin.
He actually drove his car into a white convertibe, and “deliberately” is actually THE point of contention in the trial. I do admit we’ve been given the impression that the story line is “not contested”.
As an antidote to the incurious coverage by conventional news channels, you may be interested in the videos by William Evans, on his SonOfNewo youtube channel. Here’s a story about him:
http://www.c-ville.com/videos-of-fatal-crash/
and here’s one of his earlier analyses:
His thoroughness, and his critical attitude toward the official story line, together qualify him as a “conspiracy theorist” to the MSM and the PTB’s. You may judge the significance of his reports yourself.
There is a lot of very stupid uninformed commentary in this thread.
Fields was attacked and freaked out. He did not intend to harm anyone.
The whole thing was the fault of the city and the police.
The white men had a permit to be there to protest the removal of a statue.
Antifa STARTED the violence, yet they walk, as the DOJ tries to nail every white man
that attended.
It’s a bullshit farce.
Vince at Red Elephants has the best analysis I’ve seen.
So why didn’t the airbags deploy when the Challenger rear ended one of two vehicles standing bumper to bumper at the intersection with their engines off? Why were two vehicles with their engines off standing bumper to bumper at the intersection? Why did no one emerge from the two vehicles when hit? Because the vehicles were unoccupied, having been placed there in advance to serve as a target for a false flag vehicle attack to be blamed on so-called “white supremicists”. The airbags had to be disabled as their deployment would interfere with the professional driver making his getaway. The Challenger was then handed off to Fields who was contracted to pose as a ” Nazi” and take the blame. Its complicated now because Heather Heyer had a heart attack and died. Heyer was not hit by anything, the prosecutor is lying. This was a very sophisticated and evil false flag attack.
Jewish Privilege on display
Fields had been driving around for a little while trying to find a means of egress from Charlottesville and most of the people he saw on the streets were hostile left wing counterprotestors. Your video does nothing to dispel that fact nor do split second camera shots on other videos.
He had several opportunities to run leftists down before the collision in the video yet time and again he preoccupied himself only with getting out of the city until he evidently began to panic and tried forcing his way through the crowd.
The leftist counterprotestors had no legal right to be milling around in the middle of streets blocking through traffic and acting like complete a$$holes. It was through incompetence and conspiracy on the part of the Charlottesville PD (likely on orders from the Jewish mayor and black panther vice mayor) that created the chain of events that led to this unfortunate incident.
Insanity is an improvement from premeditated murder and hate crimes that he’s being charged with but remove the politics and he would only be charged with involuntary manslaughter. This trial is all about claiming another right wing scalp for the radical left and has nothing to do with traditional concepts of justice.
Was Fields a “hate mongering criminal”, or revolutionary patriot?
Thanks, that is a helpful video. Despite the mitigating circumstances, he is being charged with 1st degree murder and hate crimes. Yet, the mayor and police who created these lawless circumstances are still fully employed and haven’t had to hire lawyers, as far as I know.
That this judge did not see fit to remove the case from the town where officials could have been charged as well really makes it appear that justice will not be done.
You are correct that I don’t know that and assumed that from the article. I conceded that reading the court transcripts may shed light on the defense strategy and paint them in a better light but I don’t know if its available and have no desire nor the time to do that right now.
But from the article it seems the defense conceded all of the prosecution’s central claims in their opening arguments which to me doesn’t seem smart. Usually competent defense counsel will contradict as many of the prosecution’s claims as possible and put damaging evidence into a different context that does less harm to their client.
The Challenger did not “ram into the crowd”. Nearly all ” the crowd” was on the sidewalks walking around two unoccupied vehicles standing bumper to bumper with engines off. The Challenger rear ended one of these mysterious vehicles. It has not been established that Fields was driving the Challenger. If the driver of the Challenger wished to kill the people in” the crowd” the time to do it was when “the crowd” was moving down the center of the street before they reached the mysterious vehicles. Why did no one emerge from the standing vehicles after the collision? Where were the drivers? Why were the vehicles bumper to bumper engines off at the intersection? Who owns these two vehicles? Why were they there? This stinks of the false flag stink.
of course the police already knew this and since the right had a permit to speak it was the job of the police to make sure they were able to exercise that right
So why didn’t the airbags deploy when the Challenger rear ended one of two vehicles standing bumper to bumper at the intersection with their engines off? Why were two vehicles with their engines off standing bumper to bumper at the intersection? Why did no one emerge from the two vehicles when hit? Because the vehicles were unoccupied, having been placed there in advance to serve as a target for a false flag vehicle attack to be blamed on so-called “white supremicists”. The airbags had to be disabled as their deployment would interfere with the professional driver making his getaway. The Challenger was then handed off to Fields who was contracted to pose as a ” Nazi” and take the blame. Its complicated now because Heather Heyer had a heart attack and died. Heyer was not hit by anything, the prosecutor is lying. This was a very sophisticated and evil false flag attack.
They are also claiming that holocaust trauma is transmitted epigenetically to the children of holocaust survivors.
I was a juror on a murder trial where the defendent was being represented by a public defender. The public defender made his concluding presentation to tbe jury wearing a Yosemite Sam tie with both pistols blasting! I couldn’t believe it. I could have done a better job defending the accused.
Does anybody know of any videos showing clearly what happened here at about the 7 sec point here? No video I’ve seen shows clearly the situation between the car and the crowd right at the moment of “impact”. For instance, were the people in the crowd making threatening gestures, like brandishing clubs, as the car approached? Did the people on the ground afterward at the side of the car jump backward, or were they hit? Pre and post events are reasonably clear, but the critical situation exactly when the car encountered the crowd is a blur, figuratively and literally
I don’t know what was happening in his head either. Since we agree we can’t assign intent, we’d have to at let him off with manslaughter or negligent homicide at worst. He is innocent until proven guilty, right? But that’s not what the prosecution is saying.
And what I presume is that you’re not just a loonie, but a disinfo agent, trying to spread confusion in an idiotic manner, since Ajax’s one nickname is “de Joden”, which is what their rivals call them at times, like Tottenham Hotspur supporters in North London call themselves.
Stop defiling Cruijff’s name, you whackjob.
Neither.
He was a sucker who believed that a widely publicized racial rally could be anything other than controlled opposition.
If I were (((hyperwealthy and powerful))), I would be worried about the racial right, and the redistributionist left. They are threats from different angles. I would infiltrate and/or fund both sides, so that I could control the outcome of any confrontation, collect information on the participants, and terrorize everyone else into submission.
None of the retards in this comment section can explain why a well-financed Jew runs the English Defense League, while at the same time another Jew funds Antifa, yet both can serve the same (((moneyed))) interests simultaneously.
The reason that many commentators here will never figure it out is that most of you believe in fair play, and you project your good intentions on people who are not well-intentioned.
I find it hard to have any sympathy for a simpleton like Fields.
yeah, exactly, the public defenders in large cities are good…they are required to have experience….now, when i was a lawyer I managed to get a few cases as a public defender out on the edge of the metro…I had little idea what to do…why? Because law school is a scam…
“One of Fields’ teachers has said he was fascinated by Nazism and admired Adolf Hitler”
That right there means the trial is over. He should have took a plea deal. He WILL BE found guilty no matter what the evidence suggests.
Guilt, innocence…….these terms are meaningless if the above testimony is true! This is just the world we live in now.
“Are you people too stupid to watch a video?”
No, but it’s obvious that you are — as video evidence clearly shows at least two of the rioters attacking Fields’ vehicle with clubs prior to the accident.
https://giphy.com/gifs/RkDLvzsdkgEtlNV3zs
Not to mention the videotaped confession by professor Dwayne Dixon (a known member of the terrorist group “antifa”) in which he admitted that he threatened Fields with a loaded rifle shortly before the collision. Bragged about his attack on Fields on social media, too:
Antifa wants to overthrow the ZOG-Govt.
Alt-right wants to overthrow the ZOG- Govt.
Whats the fuss? Get together, find common ground, both share a common enemy, goals.
Work out the details after the main goal is done. Both, assuming both are not Govt. agents themselves, are just playing into (((their))) hands fighting each other. If you are focusing your energy, resources, and time on anyone but th e common enemy, then you are both gonna lose. The enemy will win, without lifting a finger.
Wise up. Stop letting yourself be duped. Not smart!
The holohoax had a 150% survival rate, one only needs to see all of the “survivors” still alive 75 years later. It wouldn’t be surprising if these same “survivors” are around 150 years after the “holocaust”. Meanwhile, when was the last time anyone heard from a survivor of the Bolshevik genocide? The Holodomor? The Armenian genocide? The Khumer Rouge? Does anyone else see a deductive reasoning issue with lack of vocal “survivors” of real genocide, but an abundance of “holocaust” survivors still around 75 years later?
That this quote:
“The deceased, and local favorite: the Newport smoking, morbidly obese, black-uniformed, Antifa-loving, leftist radical Heather Heyer.”
appears in this article under her photo is worth more than a thousand words that tell what a horrid bigoted hateful article this is and proves that the people supporting the idea that this man did not at least commit manslaughter, is proof to me that he is involved with hateful people and has most likely committed a hate crime. Just those words beneath the photo of the deceased is a hate crime.
What is truly sad about this man who rightfully feared being Reginald Dennyied, is that he did not immediately appreciate the fact that his life was over, surrounded by mortal enemies and a just-us system that would make certain that his life ended that day.
Had he fully appreciated his martyrdom, perhaps the correct thing for him to do since he is forever labeled a “monster” was to be that monster and effect as many making good of vile filth as possible.
In the genocide that is coming for ethnic Europeans across the globe, the only way to stave it is to become the monster. In battle people die, in “civilized society” co-opted by genociders, it is only the target populations who are meant to die.
Yes, really.
To this point, I have not watched video of this bullshit. From what YOU posted, Trump’s initial reaction was completely right, in that there were stoked, armed, violent mobs on both (and maybe more than two) sides.
I have no idea if the driver was psycho, scared, or somewhere in between. I know for sure that the mob who assailed his vehicle were in a very similar mental state.
I also have no doubt which side the cops were on. It’s the cops’ fault more than anyone else’s, to judge from your clip.
said:
“i don’t believe it was staged”
Try this:
If blacks get behind trashng of ‘Israel’ the game will have changed.
Knowing that blacks oddly have a lot of influence on public perception, buying off blacks has been the game. Think of guys like Le Bron James, Don Cheadle. How long that can hold is questionable.
It was clearly a troll operation. Favre got trolled. There is NO WAY that he consciously and knowingly said that. Too Much to Lose.
I’ll bet he is now in run-and-hide mode and hoping the stuff will just blow over. And it just might because MSM doesn’t want to make USS Liberty a big issue.
But it is totally LOL. Trolls surely can be creative.
LOL
This is same absurdly incompetent crimson2 that was demolished by his fantasy ‘Nazis’ in his feeble attempts to prop up the laughably fake & impossible. ‘holocaust’ storyline. It was a rout.
Check it out in the comments here:
American Pravda: Holocaust Denial, by Ron Unz: http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/
Cheers.
http://www.codoh.com
I wonder how, after O J Simpson was acquitted, anyone can have any confidence in the USA trial by jury system.
The prosecution never made a case to the jury of how, timeline-wise, he could have done it. That’s what they said. I have to accept that. They blew it, not the jury.
You are correct. There are tens of thousands of American “holocaust survivors” who have never left the USA, or never lived in Europe during WW2, who are receiving tax-free “holocaust reparations” payments…
to me “staged” means both sides are in on it
do you really believe this?
Antifa works for the status quo, so effectively they work for the ZOG govt
Well presented, James Forrestal. Your #116 shows the two blows to the Dodge Challenger prior to impact.
Nobody is geonciding white people. Y’all are just huge cowards.
Wally is actually the best argument for white genocide. Luckily most of the whit race isn’t as worthless.
We are going to get to you people and make you howl before all is said and done.
Take that to the bank.
Death to the Left! Worldwide.
losers resort to insults when they’ve lost the argument
Unlike that fearless nog warrior crimson2. Drink you a big ol glass of stfu, nog, or else just stfu. The good news is, either way, that fearless nog warrior crimson2 gets to stfu.
Who hurt you, snowflake?
Hello.
You wrote that these words were, in and of themselves, a “hate crime.” While the description was not flattering, was it not true? She did smoke Newports, was (medically) morbidly obese, and was wearing all black in support of the BLM/antifa movement. The only speculative part was that she was a “leftist radical,” but I suspect she would not have been offended by that characterization.
I agree that Fields could face manslaughter charges, but he’s not being charged with that. He’s being charged with premeditated murder and a hate crime. He is also presumed to be innocent until proven guilty.
I disagree that this is a “horrid hateful article…proof to me that he is involved with hateful people and has most likely committed a hate crime.”
Your standard for proof of guilt seems set on a hair trigger. Your eagerness to condemn all of us on the grounds that we hate must mean that your hatred of us is the good kind, which is exactly what started all of this.
Neither. Fields was paid to pose as a “Nazi”. He was paid to be part of a false flag terror attack. He didn’t even drive the car. You are a chump conned into rationalizing the deed and defending him. Fields is a JDL agent. Wakeup.
Did you see the photos of her on the stretcher, clad in only in her Shamu-sized “sexy” panties? Imagine the apocalyptic grease fire if they cremated that swamp donkey.
Allow me to suggest to the commenters wasting their time responding to “crimson2″: Stop giving him what he wants: attention from white people. As a typical black living in the US, he defines his very existence by his access to whites. Whites with a shred of self respect do not go to his worldstar forums or whatever to “see what homie thinks,” because no one really cares what hordes of semi-literate grievance leeches think. But he cares what whites think. That is why he is here. Not to discuss or debate a given topic rationally, because that would like expecting a fish to ride a bicycle. No, he is here to draw attention to himself with his low brow, low rent, low intellect bigotry, because that is how he’s measures his value.
His shtick isn’t even creative as far as black bigotry goes – he is the Dollar Store of fatherless black anger. Shop elsewhere.
He is an embarrassment to the trolls here at Unz who actually put some thought into it.
Mr Dixon should be terminated with extreme prejudice as well as the other “professor” from Berkely who tried to crush the skull of the Trump supporter.
Here is article I wrote, titled SonofNewo’s Two Major Mistakes About the Charlottesville Incident.
Most of the Left will have to be disappeared/liquidated. The young ones will need hard labor/ re-education camps.
Building monuments to our people and our great civilization.
Yes and no. The Antifa are the street arm of the Zio/Glob MSM, but they’re hard to control and go off script.
And in the UK:
In that The New American and Steve, among others, have noted the similarities between our “cultural” revolution and Mao’s, I don’t think it is the first time that it has been pointed out that Antifa and Black Lies Matter are basically salt and pepper versions of the Red Guard.
Evidence, or at least sources please.
What makes you think he or she is black? I think most readers probably think he/she is Jewish.
He was surrounded.
He doesn’t need to have been hit from behind. He was menaced from the front by an angry mob.
That doesn’t matter. He was being threatened by an angry mob. Justifiable self defense.
And by the way, why are his brake lights on in the photo you posted?
Great points.
Why would any actually pounding on his car be required to create conditions of justifiable self defense? He was confronted with an overwhelming number of violent, angry thugs. A thicket of them in front of his view.
Thanks, but from the other side of the Atlantic I do not have the illusion of being able to find the facts.
The case is interesting for me because of all the fuss and hysteria around it.
Beyond my comprehension how in such an atmosphere there can be a fair trial, even in the Netherlands hysteria has influence on trials, up to convictions of innocent people.
But how where there is a jury deciding on guilt or not, there now can be fair trial, impossible, in my opinion.
The innocent conviction, in the Netherlands one can always appeal.
In the case I’m thinking of, just detectives with so much pressure that the not too intelligent woman just signed, could no longer stand it.
She got money, but for me this hardly is a compensation.
A lot of Nazis in prison?
YOU aren’t going to do shit. I mean, you’ll jerk off to anime at some point and make sweeping plans of a world takeover, but you’ll either continue to be basement-bound or you’ll die in a hail of police gunfire. Kinda hoping for the latter.
Some real intellectual heft undergirding this little Nazi movement at Unz.
It’s gonna be hard to preserve the master race when the only place your seed ends up is covering your Nanna’s My Pillow ™.
And here’s Mr. Louisville slugger on the follow through:
He was only going 25 mph at the time of the collision. Not a very determined “terrorist.”
no, someone hit the left rear of his car with a bat or stick before he had done anything
why had they already decided that he was the enemy?
and after he hit the car in front of him, rather than being shocked they were all ready to attack him and did so
seems to be accurate
why does it hurt your feelings?
I said what I said with a solid awareness that the world and humanity as a whole had in 1776 and 1789, and does have at present in 2018, many severe problems between peoples, and between men and women, that need working on. And that there’s plenty of responsibility to share for the present sad shape of things.
I used the terms Capitalism and Communism liberally in my previous post as people in places such as the ‘sister republics’ of the United States and France sometimes forget the exact ideological origins/nature of their respective ‘sister’ revolutions, the former with its artificial hyper-individualism, the latter with its artificial hyper-collectivism.
Indeed, there seems to be almost something like historical embarrassment in this area at times, though to be sure I think there are likely additional reasons besides.
Some might not wish these matters looked at too closely today as it ‘complicates’ things.
As an example, regarding the nascent US flag of 1776, the ‘Grand Union’, and its being identical to the multinational corporation British East India Company flag, when it’s addressed at all (generally it’s not) it’s something along the lines of ‘by remarkable coincidence’ the Grand Union flag as designed ‘looked a lot like’ the East India Company flag.
It’s as if we’re supposed to believe the founding revolutionary elite of the United States were all a bunch of country bumpkins rather than the quite sophisticated individuals a great many of them actually were, who had no awareness of the two flags being identical.
It was, it should be said, a belief in souless Capitalism that led to the rape of the land, practically wiped out the buffallo, the ‘Indian’ tribes largely too, and is in the process at present of genociding by ‘mixing’ what remains of the organic identity of the people of the United States, Western Europe, and much of the remainder of the world as well.
Not dissimilarly regarding the French Revolution of 1789, with its Commune, ‘counter-revolutionarys’, political commissars (commissaire politique), and mass arrests and executions, etc, there seems also to be ‘embarrassment’, ie a loathness to admit, that this was the template for what evolved into the closely paralleling [to Capitalism] and equally souless Communism of the Soviet Union and Red China (and let’s not forget Cambodia), and their associated murders of tens of millions.
This I submit has been from the beginning a manufactured, contrived, and faux Hegelian Dialectic of thesis (1776 – Capitalism), anti-thesis (1789 – Communism), and synthesis (present and into the future – global Multi-Culturalism).
However, you add the zero of Capitalism and the zero of Communism, and you still get zero with Multi-Culturalism.
People as individuals, and as part of larger peoples, ie as living entities, are not meant to be souless automatons to be programmed, manipulated, coerced, and forced into an anti-life, artificial, and hatred driven dialectic and paradigm.
As stated, the world does have many problems that need working on, but not in this way…ie as it is being conducted under cover of what amounts to a gigantic deception by playing both ‘sides’ of this manufactured dialectic – thoroughly corrupting those doing so – and thereby entering into the realm of the Big Lie, is ‘empire’ seeking (see the link below regarding the ‘New Rome’) in a quest for total world power, has wage slavery (ie chattel slavery and its trade monetized via the ‘cheap labor’/mass immigration system) as its economic and political basis, utilizes massive amounts of violence, ie WWI, WWII, Vietnam, Korea, Antifa, etc and is hatred driven which this faux dialectic’s promoters project upon everyone else.
Regarding hatred, simply politely and in a civil manner (as one should always do and be) question certain of the tenants of multi-culturalism with a believer in that ideology, and then you’ll see some real hatred.
All this can be said without it absurdly (as part of a false dichotomy) ipso facto making one a ‘Hater!’TM, a ‘Fascist’!TM, Nazi!TM, or, an ‘Anti-Semite!’TM, etc.
I can only suppose that there are plenty of others besides myself who would be plenty content with a small non-empire seeking, non-slavery based, non-multicultural freedom of association allowing, even US style in certain ways, republic, that actually represented the interest of its citizens.
As it stands, as part of the ‘synthesis’ of this contrived dialectic, the world appears ever more likely to be on the cusp of WWIII and billions of people may very well die.
And what then?
A ‘perfect’ world state is to be ushered in?
A glorious and in theory democratic global republic, the United States of the World/World Union perhaps?
If achieved, it would be naive to think that those elites and hangers on of the various peoples involved, who have historically for hundreds of years now utilized on a grand scale, deception, fraud, theft, violence, slavery, and mass murder to achieve this end, would change their spots, or, even be able to.
And where will people run to then?
Anyhow..
The ‘cure’ for the world’s ills that’s been offered to the peoples of the world and to mankind as a whole since 1776 and 1789, with this manufactured and contrived dialectic, is worse than the ‘disease’.
It’s literally killing us.
‘The defection of Marseilles soon produced that of Lyons. This important city became the central point of the counter revolution in the South…’
https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/revolution_and_counter_revolution
https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_new_rome_or_the_united_states_of_the_world_1853
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_commissar
and this was owned and run not by British but by a certain 2% or 1% per usual….
Prosecution witnesses are apparently being coached — they all use the word “joyful” to describe the “anti-protestors” aka the unruly antifa mob.
Antifa prof Dwayne Dixon admits brandishing an assault rifle at Fields.
That pussy professor admitted to assault with a deadly weapon. He should be in trial as well.
When I made my comment yesterday I didn’t know that Favre had apologized. If he didn’t understand the hidden meaning of what he was reading, yet put it out there for the world to see, then perhaps he should have had a proof reader. At least he gave the $500 to charity. As I said, maybe too many concussions.
True that.
As an aside, but related, many are not aware or have forgotten, that circa 1970 the same tactic those groups use now to extra-judicially neutralize the police, by literally surrounding them as they do their work with picture takers, was used then, almost fifty years ago.
Of course, as the technology was different, it would be persons with Polaroids, Kodaks, and super 8 movie cameras rather than the cell phone cameras of today.
But the desired effect was achieved, even so, to make the police hesitant and to second guess themselves about doing their (in general) lawful duties, while allowing ‘activists’ a much freer hand to engage in what was often not so lawful activity.
Same forces at work.
Same corporate media as today giving a ‘green light’ to these ‘demonstraters’ with favorable coverage.
“I used the terms Capitalism and Communism liberally in my previous post as people in places such as the ‘sister republics’ of the United States and France sometimes forget the exact ideological origins/nature of their respective ‘sister’ revolutions, the former with its artificial hyper-individualism, the latter with its artificial hyper-collectivism.”
Let’s parse:
“I”… “sometimes forget the exact ideological origins/nature of their respective ‘sister’ revolutions”
My point: My major critique of your first post.
“I said what I said with a solid awareness that the world and humanity as a whole had in 1776 and 1789, and does have at present in 2018, many severe problems between peoples, and between men and women, that need working on.”
OK! Ice cream tastes great. Elvis had a great voice.
“However, you add the zero of Capitalism and the zero of Communism, and you still get zero with Multi-Culturalism.”
Hmm! Are any of these 3 zeros? All are complete failures? Or is your point unclear?
You might try to have a friend proofread (for understanding & context) your comments. When I write seriously, (not for this forum), I usually have a love one (or anyone), proofread.
It is helpful for we citizens – as sometimes we have too many brilliant thoughts and cannot find a way to express them so that others understand. A good critique sometimes forces us to improve.
The conscious efforts to confuse the people – by way of imprecise use of language (on the part of government and controlled Media), is a terrible weapon against American Citizens’ need to understand, and move forward. One example of this misuse of language is, the use of the term “anti-Semite” to mean any criticism of Zionism, and, or, Jews, (the overwhelming majority of whom are not Semites -peoples of the Middle East). The actual anti-Semites are the Zionist Oligarchs and their in-tow Jews, who ethnically cleanse Palestinians, and make war against, and denigrate all the Arab (Semitic) peoples.
This was your conclusion:
“As it stands, as part of the ‘synthesis’ of this contrived dialectic, the world appears ever more likely to be on the cusp of WWIII and billions of people may very well die.”
You should have ended here, – to begin next time with a suggestion of where (and How), we may go from here to avoid this horrifying threat.
As American Patriots: we must
Restore our Republic, that was destroyed (in a hail of gunfire), on November 22, 1963, along with our last Constitutional President, John F. Kennedy
All leftists? Pity; you had been making so much sense….
Consider the ACLU: it initially supported the UTR rally, but under Antifa pressure withdrew its traditional support of Constitutional free speech. After 90 years of keeping faith with ts demanding charter, the ACLU lost its raison d’etre as a radical supporter of Constitutional rights. Did those who had joined the ACLU suddenly drop their principles as well? And did all left supporters of Constitutional radicalism suddenly shift as well? You do stalwart leftists who were horrified by this shift a disservice.
In fairness to the ACLU and other organizations coming under exceptional political pressures, it’s difficult to defend a Constitution when city officials and police officers entrusted to its implementation fail to enforce it. This has led to a wholesale breakdown of “law and order”, where demonstrators are treated unequally. Really, this official negligence is the elephant in the political room. The situational crisis has its origins not in a political divide, but in elite ineptitude/corruption failing to guarantee lawful behavior and enforcement thereof.
I agree with your, “infer malign intent because you don’t like James Field’s politics”, but the political bias of the trial, and acceptance of this premise, should be no surprise. The justice system it claims to uphold is governed by the same system as the one that neglected peacekeeping responsibility and engaged in biased enforcement during and after the UTR demonstration. The fact that our institutions are collapsing at the mechanistic level deserves closer inspection. (The bureaucratic bias here is unnervingly similar to that exposed in the behavior and attitudes of the FBI.)
Instead of ascribing speculative motives to the left, you might be better off pondering the ancient question, Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Quite true. They don’t seem to have thought it out. (Of course that’s provided they do any thinking.
)
By now, even the dumbest Antifa knows DOJ/FBI is on their side.
That video is ridiculously sped up. Either that or the people in it are faster than the Flash.
Apparently YOU are too stupid to watch a video, or have selective vision. All the video I have seen show his car being attacked by at least two “protesters” with sticks/bats before the incident. Not to mention the admission of that phaggy commie professor “chasing Fields away with a rifle” right before. Either you are blind or a liar.
And you call yourself “Wizard of Oz”? Use your noggin Zardoz.
The usual suspects decided he shouldn’t have a proper defense, and banned any online crowdfunding attempts.
Dixon encouraging antifa
scum“counter-protestors” to be “joyful”.He runs away like a girl and calls police when confronted about his possession/use of a weapon that day.
Sounds pretty much like what kikes in Germany and Leftist filth in Spain were mouthing right before they ended up in ditches.
It’s gonna be a real hoot disposing of trash like you.
I wonder if Fields can file charges against him? That would go a log way toward getting this POS fired.
Because he was speeding toward a crowd of people?
He’s guilty and the arguments in this thread are so fucking terrible even his desperate defense won’t touch them.
Seriously, are you going to break down in tears when your boy is convicted?
Nazis ended up killing their own children last time, and they actually had an army. Now you have a group of twenty fellow virgins–and probably four of them are feds.
At least you won’t have to kill your own kids since you’ll probably never get laid. Baby steps.
Most of the heavies on the left have convicted James Fields already. So if not all leftists then who on the left is treating this case objectively and dispassionately instead of with the usual lynch mob mentality one sees on MSNBC and CNN?
To be fair, former AG Jeff Sessions, who’s supposedly a conservative, labeled James Fields a duh-mestic tearist in the immediate wake of the incident when he should have remained neutral until all the facts were known. The presumption of innocence clearly doesn’t apply to wrong thinking whites.
Well that’s great stuff for SNL and the like, but the reality is your lies are slowly being brought down. Let’s face it, you ladies blew a gasket when Trump was elected..lol
Our people still do the work to keep this country going. When we decide we’ve had enough, YOU and your kind are going to have an epiphany.
Objectively?
I live thousands of miles away in a different country and I have no horse in this race. Few minutes on youtube show me why this guy is being charged with serious crimes. Nothing strange about it after what he did. Same thing would happen all over the world. The excuses put forth in the article and comments here are not convincing at all.
In marches and protests this is frequently a problem. Few, even one bad apple ruin everything for the rest. Like this guy did, whatever moral high ground or public support the UTR had went down the drain when he rammed his car into a crowd of people. It sucks I know but grasping straws and denying what he did doesn’t help the situation in any way.
If I understand correctly – this march was in part about white supremacy. In my view this is not how it works and neither how it’s done.
Regarding the British East India Company circa 1776, not saying that’s not the case, don’t know, but do you have a source regarding that by chance?
I’m familiar with The Great Red Dragon book of 1890 but it doesn’t go into detail regarding its claims.
Hmmm…I have quite a good grasp of what both Capitalism and Communism are and meant what I wrote as written.
It seems we have a simple difference of belief on the subject, and that’s cool.
One difference would seem to be that you take seriously and believe the whole Capitalist/Communist, Conservative/Liberal, Left/Right paradigm of the past two hundred plus years, seeing it as viable (combined with a not too good of an understanding of what all that exactly is) whereas I don’t take it seriously, nor believe, or see it as viable, and only see it as a somewhat vague at times descriptor of people’s beliefs that many choose to go by.
As stated, that’s cool.
We’ll just agree to disagree and leave it at that.
You know, regarding the ‘Four Olds’ of ‘old customs, old culture, old habits and old ideas,’ that the Red Guards went after in China, I could very well see an officially sanctioned Antifa doing the very same in the United States; ie destroying ‘old’ books, changing ‘old’ street names, destroying museums, burning down prominent ‘old’ churches, invading ‘old’ grave yards, toppling the grave stones, and literally digging up corpses and exposing them to humiliation.
Would they be ‘officially allowed’ to go so far as to desecrate the graves of founding revolutionary elite such as George Washington, Ben Franklin, and John Hancock in such a way…or as a sop be only ‘allowed’ to do so to the graves of ‘renegade’ Southern Confederacy elites such as Jefferson Davis and Robert E Lee?
The latter might be the more likely scenario.
And wasn’t it, in a much broader and destructive sense, going after the ‘Four Olds’ of Germany when the Capitalist United States fire bombed and destroyed the German art city of Dresden in early 1945?
And not dissimilarly in the US army’s standing down and deliberately allowing the wanton looting of Iraq’s antiquities in Baghdad after Saddam Hussein’s fall?
Within this manufactured and contrived dialectic of Capitalism and Communism that’s been in place since 1776 and 1789, a major aspect of it has been the destruction of people’s organic identity, to make way for the planned world state.
The statue destruction we’ve seen in the United States, is for the promoters of this faux dialectic, likely just the beginning of what they intend to do.
What do you want? Progress from the times of Pharaohs with broken noses?
Any narrative that doen’t bring up the likely possibility that the car attack was staged and a stunt driver substituted for Fields who was the designated patsy helps the Deep State.
Our side seems to prefer the OCT (probably because many of the alt-right leaders were accomplices in the charade)
The fact is, the Deep State controls everything including the media and will spin it how they want and the American ppl , told to clap on command, will clap on command except our group which has become the new Osama Bin Laden clan
One would think, but then self-delusion can run very strong.
Some, such as the hard core Red Guards of China, the Old Bolsheviks of Russia, or Calif Rep Leo Ryan along with many hundreds of others at Jonestown, ‘didn’t get the memo’, and will believe right up until the very end, and then some.
And though it pains me to say it, the flag wavers who openly and proudly proclaim themselves ‘Capitalists’ on the AM radio talk shows, are operating under a not dissimilar self-delusion as the Antifa people who call themselves ‘Communists’.
How that anyone can still believe in the Capitalist/Communist, Left/Right, conservative/liberal paradigm with what’s known now defys logic. WWII by itself, where supposed arch enemies the Capitalist US and Communist Russia figuratively embraced and openly joined forces should of been enough to strongly discourage belief in the faux paradigm.
I believed in it at one time too, though.
The power of the Big Lie one can only suppose.
Such a big lie, who could believe that it exist?
As for the Antifa people, my guess is that should a planned economic collapse of the US take place as some think (ie a loudly proclaimed ‘Fall of Capitalism’) the Antifa types will be allowed to play out a Red October 2.0 type of event, very possibly followed by a Russian Civil War like scenario mixed with Red Guard style ‘Cultural Revolution’.
The ultimate aim (should all that take place) would perhaps be the creation of something like China at present with its heavy mix of Capitalism and Communism, the bulk of the surviving future US population reduced to being an internationally mobile force of unskilled and skilled wage slaves, ‘paid’ ten cents to a dollar an hour instead of the twenty or twenty-five dollars or more the labor would in reality be worth, and sans the benefit and comfort the Chinese at least have at present of ethnicity and a geographic home.
In such a scenario what they are promoting today regarding the acceptance of ‘mass immigration’ will have become true..
We’re all immigrants now.
The rank and file Antifa may well join up in droves a renamed NSA, manifesting as a Stasi like organization, as over grown hall monitors to keep a close eye on potential ‘Fascist!TM’ amongst the public, ie most everyone who doesn’t believe just as they do, a lot of people, perhaps most.
Got to keep a close watch over even their own fellow Antifa don’t you know.
The hardcore Antifa, who might not understand the still large chunks of at times all too often dominating Capitalism mixed in with the Communism, and might even ‘peek behind the curtain’ and see signs of the ‘money power’ and or ‘plutocracy’ behind the scenes running the show, and who might therefore choose to persist in continuing ‘the fight’ for pure Communism, well their fate may well be that of their brethren in late 1960′s China.
If they’re really lucky they might merely be sent to a ‘re-education’/hard labor camp for a few years.
‘At the same time the PLA carried out mass executions of Red Guards in Guangxi province…Mao, the Chairman informed them gently of the end of the [Red Guard] movement with a tear in his eye..’
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Guards
As if it’s that unusual a thing for a pedestrian to be struck and killed by a motor vehicle. Keep in mind that this is a small town without significant public transit and a “state of emergency” was declared. The motorist was attempting to comply with orders of the Governor of Virginia, but found ways of egress blocked at several points by angry and hostile protestors who were disobeying the Guv’s orders and illegally walking in the street. His vehicle was attacked at least twice briefly before the collision, and the car was only traveling at 25 mph at the moment of impact.
I don’t fully understand what you’re trying to say, but my impression is that the main point of the aborted rally was to protest the impending removal of the statue of Gen. Robert Lee that had stood at what was to be the rally site for about 100 years.
Was Fields a “hate mongering criminal”, or revolutionary patriot?
Also, how do I post images, is this going through?
There is a lesson to be learned here about having a movement’s credibility destroyed by allowing extremists into the fold.
The Right is not allowed to allowed to deny anyone access to a public event. Clearly however , the Left ( e.g., Antifa) *is* allowed to do so, proving that they are auxiliary paramilitary of the deep state/permanent government. See Moldbug for copious details.
100% correct. Finally a commenter with a brain. Notice how the chumps have been herded by the “alt-right” agents provacatuers into assuming Fields did it and supporting the bogus “self defense” theory, so easily slapped down by professional disinformation agents like “niceland”. Notice how ” niceland” simply ignores my reply to him asking why didn’t the Challengers airbags deploy, or to account for the two vehicles, unoccupied with engines off bumper to bumper blocking the street at the intersection of 4th and Water( maroon minivan and white sedan with black top). How the Challenger reversing at high speed up the street is so obviously a highly skilled professional stunt driver. Wake up people you are being led by your idiotic contard nose!!!!
he’s a jew, that makes him your boy
thats what the media would like you to believe
“If I understand correctly – this march was in part about white supremacy. ”
You don’t understand correctly. Do some more reading before you continue making a fool of yourself.
i) Why didn’t the air bags deploy? What first comes to mind is -why would they deploy? This wasn’t a “hard” collision for what appears to be 4000lb car. It pushed the other vehicles a bit reducing the negative acceleration picked up by the sensor(s) controlling the air bag system. Granted I am not familiar with this car nor it’s air bag system but judging by my own experience and observations I am not surprised the air bags didn’t deploy. If there is something suspicious about this I am sure you can put forth data to back up your perspective.
ii) The other two cars – I don’t know, perhaps they were simply stuck in “traffic” from the crowd or belonged to some members of the crowd or whatever. Videos from the incident show wast crowd of people in front of these cars totally blocking their path.
iii) Car reversing in high speed indicating professional driver – In my view it was well done but nothing exceptional. Judging by his choice of car Mr. Fields might be a car guy and experienced and capable driver.
iv)As for your overall theory there isn’t much to discuss until you put forth some supporting evidence!?
And anyone in the jury pool who demonstrates, during jury selection, that he knows a fact from a fig newton will be dismissed by peremptory challenge from one side or the other. Happened to me on a murder case.
It brings joy to my heart to learn the Charlottesville march by the UTR was not about white supremacy. Because there was nothing supreme about it whatsoever. My viking ancestors who crossed the north Atlantic and settled our cold rock on the very edge of the hospitable world would be spinning in their graves if they learned about the incompetence, stupidity and lack of valor displayed in Charlottesville on behalf of the white race. Thankfully – according to you this is of no concern because it didn’t happen.
Since this article is about the state of mind of one Mr Field – Why was he present, was he trying to unite the right or did he drive all night from Ohio to Charlottesville because he was history buff and concerned with the legacy of Robert Lee?
There are filthy liars on this thread.
A five minutes ago CNN did show the moment of the impact.
There were two cars stuck together going. The second car was pushing the first car.
The first car had his trunk totally pushed in.
Field is absolutely not guilty.
“My viking ancestors who crossed the north Atlantic and settled our cold rock on the very edge of the hospitable world would be spinning in their graves if they learned about the incompetence, stupidity and lack of valor displayed in Charlottesville on behalf of the white race.”
As would mine, but that isn’t the issue I addressed.
“Thankfully – according to you this is of no concern because it didn’t happen. ”
Straw man. Read the following carefully: There is no white supremacy movement in the United States. The loosely defined idea of the so-called “alt-right” is about United States Americans of European ancestry coming to the realization that their heritage and history are being criminalized and distorted while their right to associate freely has been all but eliminated. This “movement” for lack of a better term, does not wish to reign supreme over any other ethnic or racial group, it wishes to simply to secure for itself a place that people of European ancestry can live in peace free of the degenerate, parasitic, globalist coalition of African, Asian, mestizo etc, etc, hordes that feel they not only have a right to access whites and their productivity, but to tell whites they are evil for not readily and happily turning over their wealth and produce to those same groups of leeches.
With that said, I wish the Chinese, and the Africans, and the Muslims, and the mestizos all the best, AFTER they return to their own countries. If that is your definition of supremacy, then you need to file a lawsuit against your country’s educational system for gross negligence.
“Since this article is about the state of mind of one Mr Field – Why was he present, was he trying to unite the right or did he drive all night from Ohio to Charlottesville because he was history buff and concerned with the legacy of Robert Lee?”
The article is about the trial of Fields and its relation to the injustices already applied in other trials related to the UTR event. If you truly want to know why he was present, I suggest you send him a letter while he sits in prison. I’m not a mind reader.
1) Airbags. Niceland, you position appears to be that the collision was too light to trigger the airbags, but you offer only subjective opinion for that. So what does the NHTSA have to say? Airbags are designed to deploy in a moderate to severe collision. Against a solid barrier a moderate collision is 8mph, a severe collision 14mph and higher. Against a parked car a moderate collision is 16mph, a severe collision 28mph and higher. The Challenger hit, barrier style, a parked sedan that was bumper to bumper with a parked minivan(this is confirmed by video taken of the two standing vehicles taken well before “the crowd” arrived). It would be safe to say the total mass of those two vehicles was equal to or greater than the Challenger. I have watched the Challenger videos many times and it was moving fast, even considering the subjective distortion of the narrow street. The apologists for Fields, who seek to minimize how fast the Challenger was traveling, acknowledge it was moving at least 25mph. Even allowing that the Challenger slowed before impact, it is hardly an exaggeration to claim it hit the white sedan at 16mph, which would trigger the airbags. I have “put forth data to back up my perspective”, how about you? 2) The other two cars. There is video of the intersection of 4th and Water well before the incident. The maroon minivan is seen standing at the intersection blocking traffic on 4th no less than 15 minutes before “the crowd” arrives, and doesn’t move(interestingly the video catches the Challenger driving slowly on Water past the front of the minivan). Soon after, video picks up the white car with black top standing bumper to bumper with the minivan. Both vehicles have heavy tinted windows blacking out the interior and neither moves before, or after,the incident. After the collision no passengers emerge from the sedan or minivan, as would be reasonably expected, indicating there were no passengers. Your rationalizations about why these two vehicles were standing at the intersection are not supported by the video evidence.3) If you think reversing at that speed uphill on a narrow laneway straight as an arrow is “nothing exceptional”, you must be a nondriver. I am an excellent driver of 45 years experience and I would not dare. OK, differance of opinion, but I don’t take yours seriously. 4) You and I are discussing the supporting evidence, and I thank you, Niceland, for your courteous challenge, your move.
An hour-long discussion of the incident and the legal process that followed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEDy9Yj1FSg&feature=push-lbss&attr_tag=tvK_z6mBEtHtjYux%3A6
A philosophical discussion for the benefit of those who choose to focus on ideological questions rather than the facts of the facts of the case:
In Israel???
So “a few minutes on youtube” makes you an expert and has convinced you of an airtight case against James Fields? I wouldn’t want you on the jury.
Fake news and you fell for it because you’re a left wing political bigot. It was about protecting confederate monuments that are slated for removal but some attendees did speak out about the race replacement immigration policies that are making whites a minority in the nation their ancestors founded and built.
If A professional stunt driver was used sleeps with the fishes like the Seth Rich killer.
I can almost hear the banjo playing: da da ding ding ding ding ding ding ding.
I heard they took aliens from Area 51 and dressed them up as neo-Nazis and anyone who discounts my theory is just a tool of the Deep State and proof that I’m right.
Brilliant comment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Should be immediately accepted as white people MANIFESTO.
What? I had no idea. We really need to advertise this fact. I suggest that we line up a bunch of alt-right guys and drive a car over them at 25 mph just to show everyone how it’s no big deal.
I volunteer to drive. Who wants to save the white race with me?
nothing wrong with that but it demonstrates once again the dishonesty of the (((media)))
also, they are admitting that people would feel less sympathy for the real (300 lb) Heather Heyer by only showing the thinner version
You’re the ones who are always blocking roadways and yelling, “WHOSE STREETS? OUR STREETS!” You really can’t expect to do that decade after decade without suffering an occasional casualty.
I hope that SOMEONE out there was paying attention at the time of the Charlottesville psyop. Fields could not have been the driver of “the car.” Photos of the driver while backing show it clearly wasn’t him. Analysis of the photos posted supposedly showing the “ramming” provide proof that multiple takes of the “crash” were made. “Heather Heyer”s mother was a professional crisis actor, and I assume Heather was as well (did she really die?). The whole thing stinks on ice, and the truth has no way of being served by the persecution of Fields.
more likely it wasn’t antifa but the ACLU’s (((donors))) that decided they didn’t like Free Speech after all
“It is not contested, as far as I understand, that the accused drove his car into a group of people deliberately.”
That is an accurate description of the legacy media narrative.
It is not an accurate description of the facts.
Let’s review the major events of the day prior to the collision.
https://dailycaller.com/2017/08/14/heres-how-the-virginia-state-police-provoked-violence-at-charlottesville/
Major points:
The peacefully-assembled nationalists were waiting in Lee Park for the lawfully-permitted rally to begin at its scheduled time of noon when Gov. McAuliffe declared the bogus “state of emergency” at 11:30 AM.
This was immediately followed by a mass police assault on the lawfully-assembled nationalists at 11:42 AM.
At the time of the initial police attack, the police controlled roads on the N, E, and W sides of the park. The street to the south of the park (Market St.) was filled with rioting antifa (no permit required, of course), but since access to the park was by 2 narrow stairways, the nationalists had been able to prevent this chaos from penetrating into the park itself up to this point. Law enforcement had made no attempt to keep the antifa attackers separate from the rally, of course. The police assault consisted of a line of close to 1000 police moving southward from the north end of the park with pepper spray, batons, and riot gear — deliberately forcing the nationalists out of the narrow access stairways at the south end of the park, into the antifa/ BLM ambush.
There were no police on Market St — absolutely zero effort was made to contain rioting antifa/ BLM. The police involved in the initial attack then withdrew/ returned to Lee Park, leaving the nationalists to make their way out of area via a gauntlet of antifa/ BLM attacks with:
–clubs
–pepper spray
– flamethrowers
–various projectiles including bottles, sticks, rocks, and balloons filled with feces/ urine — the last is a typical antifa tactic when attacking/ suppressing political dissidents. At the time of his arrest, Fields’ shirt was noted to be saturated with urine from these attacks.
Note that traffic collision involving Fields occurred at 1:42 PM — more than 2 hours after McAuliffe declared the bogus “state of emergency.” The excuse given for this declaration was that law enforcement had lost control of the rioting, and need to break up any public assemblies in order to regain control. Needless to say, this seems rather… odd, as law enforcement made zero effort to interfere with antifa rioting in the streets over the next couple of hours. During this period of time, the nationalists were making their way out of the city as best they could — while antifa and BLM attacked them and generally engaged in unimpeded rioting.
Take a look at any of the photos of the scene immediately before and after the collision — masses of people blocking traffic/ rioting in defiance of the “unlawful assembly” order, but no law enforcement presence anywhere to be seen.
Professor Dwayne Dixon (a known member of the terrorist group “antifa”) has confessed on video that he threatened Fields with a loaded rifle and “chased” him shortly before the collision. Dixon bragged about his attack on Fields on social media, too:
http://i68.tinypic.com/34o7olg.png
Immediately prior to the collision, at least two of the rioters attacked Fields’ vehicle with clubs.
The legacy media narrative that has been universally promoted is that this was a premeditated terrorist attack. let’s take a little deeper look at that. In a typical “Allahu Akbar!” type of terrorist attack with a vehicle:
–The attacker has a definite target in mind
–He uses a heavy, tall/ high-profile vehicle (typically a box truck, or at least a full-size van)
–He is not attacked or threatened by pedestrians prior to colliding with them
–The vehicle is stolen, hijacked, or rented.
–The attacker deliberately drives at high speed into a pedestrian area
–He continues to pursue pedestrians until the vehicle is stuck/ no longer operable
–After the vehicle comes to a stop, the attacker either attempts to escape, or jumps out and continues to attack pedestrians with a hand-held weapon.
–Attacker does not show evidence of remorse.
By contrast, Fields was:
–Simply trying to find a clear path out of Charlottesville that would allow him to escape from antifa, who had already attacked him before he got to his car, chased him/ threatened him with loaded firearms while in the car, and attacked his vehicle with clubs when he slowed down.
–Driving a passenger car that is relatively low to the ground, thus a poor choice for deliberately crushing pedestrians.
–Attacked/ threatened by antifa multiple times prior to the collision. The mob was stopping traffic and attacking other cars as well.
–Driving his own car.
–Driving at speeds of 15-25 mph, in traffic lanes, just prior to the collision, and hit the brakes several times. He collided with the stopped traffic in front of him at low enough speed that the car’s airbags did not deploy.
–Remained in the car, did not attempt to flee the scene, and appeared upset/ tearful.
We know of Fields’ apparent mental state in the immediate aftermath of the collision (and some of the other details) in part because of Tweets from Taylor Lorenz, a “journalist” who was at the scene immediately after the accident. She works for The Atlantic and The Hill — neither of which is known as a whitesupreemistnazifascist publication, to say the least.
She deleted this and other tweets about the aftermath of the collision once the legacy media false narrative of “muh deliberate terrorist attack” became clearer.
http://www.vdare.com/posts/car-that-crashed-was-reportedly-being-swarmed-by-antifa-was-it-self-defense?
Note that Lorenz was attacked at the scene — punched in the face, and had her phone knocked out of her had. By antifa, of course. Attacking anyone filming their crimes is a common antifa tactic, used both to limit any potential legal evidence, and to make it easier to establish and control the desired legacy media narrative.
More context on Charlottesville and Fields:
https://vdare.com/articles/charlottesville-after-a-year-repression-of-unite-the-right-rally-just-the-beginning-can-historic-america-nation-survive
https://vdare.com/articles/ann-coulter-charlottesville-hate-crime-prosecution-sarah-jeong-better-drive-carefully
The Heaphy Report, an independent review of the Charlottesville events that was commissioned by the city government, concluded that Charlottesville government, the various law enforcement organizations involved, and the city and state attorneys were, at best, incompetent and negligent in their planning for and management of the situation. A more reasonable interpretation would be that they deliberately worked to facilitate antifa attacks on the nationalists.
https://www.policefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Charlottesville-Critical-Incident-Review-2017.pdf
Who was that 3rd person – you?
Yes the “counter protesters” were just as violent as the UTR members – your president was correct about that one. They were infuriated by the earlier KKK march in July, when the clan in robes and all marched and held speeches under heavy police protection. And yes, the police involvement, or lack there of is strange indeed. However reading the report cited in the article it’s clear the issue is complex mixture of many things. https://www.policefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Charlottesville-Critical-Incident-Review-2017.pdf
Kicking off the UTR event with the torch march on the Friday night was quite something. Thinking about symbolism and the earlier KKK march, I wonder what the message was? In any case if there was any hope of further infuriating counter protesters and prohibit wide public support – this was as good as it gets. In my book this doesn’t quite match the honest and modest wish for the right to assemble and exercise the right of free speech. This was something else.
What I find remarkable is the idea that marches like this can really change anything. In the end the U.S. has sizable police force and various forces under government control armed to the teeth including endless lines of three letter agencies – it will use to crush violent protests if they will – like a bug. The only chance anti immigration groups have is by rallying massive public support and strong financial backers. Fridays torch march was like a big stop sign in this regard.
The horrible and sad incident when one Mr. Fields rammed his car into a crowd was the nail in the coffin. The only way out of that one was denouncing him right away, giving public statements – not in our name etc – but this wasn’t the case. On the contrary he was defended and excused – at least by some “leaders” of the “alt-right” groups. Gigantic P.R. mistake if the alt-right wanted to accomplish anything in the public arena. Apparently it didn’t. Instead it offered it’s head on a silver platter to the MSM. And the MSM didn’t fall out of the skies yesterday, it’s function should be well understood by the alt-right leaders of all people.
“UTR” was a bad idea in the first place for the grey-haired people protesting removal of Robert E. Lee statues. Like inviting Pol Pot to a Bernie Sanders rally.
How many of you brain-dead rednecks has to be put away before you realize that you’re unwanted here? Go to Russia or Hungary or some other white paradise.
@jilles dykstra
“It is not contested, as far as I understand, that the accused drove his car into a group of people deliberately.”
That is an accurate description of the legacy media narrative.
It is not an accurate description of the facts.
Let’s review the major events of the day prior to the collision.
https://dailycaller.com/2017/08/14/heres-how-the-virginia-state-police-provoked-violence-at-charlottesville/
No.
I’ve been living outside the US for 16 years.
The defenses of Fields are lunacy. As usual, there are unanswered questions (such as why the van was parked at the intersection) but really no doubt whatsoever that Fields deliberately drove at killing speed into the crowd. He braked at the last moment, probably because he didn’t see the two cars blocking his path until the then, and before that thought he was just going to run through and over people. Nobody struck him with a “bat” until it was too late to matter. If the guy who claims to have threatened him with a gun (“military-grade assault rifle”? LOL!) actually did that, it was far too early to be relevant to Fields’ guilt. His airbags didn’t deploy? It’s a tricked out muscle car. Who says they were in working order? Heather Heyer can be seen directly in front of Fields’ car, over the roof, about 50′ up the street from where she ended up, and her “heart attack” consisted of a torn aorta associated with a severe contusion to her chest. She was struck and killed, and her obesity didn’t cause her death, as if that mattered. Etc.
All sorts of government malfeasance and judicial scandal has been and is being directed at the UtR protesters. And a lot of lying, too. But Fields is guilty of murder and numerous vehicular assaults. Deal with it.
He is not guilty of first degree murder. At best he should be sanctioned by the International Whaling Commission for harvesting a whale without a tag while using the wrong harpoon type.
Heather Heyer was not struck by the Challenger, nor was she ever “directly in front of Fields’ car”. She was standing close to the left side of the unoccupied, engine off, white car with black top that stood bumper to bumper with the maroon minivan( also unoccupied with engine off). No vehicle or debris hit Heyer, but the emotional shock of the collision, aggravated by her poor health, did cause a heart attack. Note that it has not been established that Fields was at the wheel of the Challenger when it collided with the white car/maroon minivan combination.
Yes — the guilty parties in the unfortunate death of the morbidly obese individual in question are: Mayor Michael ‘Shalom’ Signer, primarily; secondarily, various individuals in the police department who ordered and carried out the “stand down.”
One panicked individual in a car trying to flee cowardly Signer rioting mob but tragically getting caught in it, should not be charged with any crime.
So Michael Signer is much more guilty than James Fields. If hate crime is a valid legal concept (and for this, there seems no doubt that Fields will be convicted), Rabbi Signer ought to be charged with Hatred of ethnonationalist Whites.
_______________
It is a shame that Mr. Conte did not mention Michael Signer in this writeup; the Mayor is guilty of both unconstitutional suppression of free speech and deliberately creating mob violence. No Signer, no Heather Heyer heart attack. I wonder if Signer has any sense of personal remorse over this. Unlikely.
See also: Red Ice TV interview with an expert on the James Fields case [1h 30m], including many videos and pictures of the incident. It goes into a lot more depth than this 1,900-word article can for reasons of space.
How many of the ’60s Red Guards were dangerously obese?
Note: “This video is unavailable.”
___________
Yes. There seems no solid case that Fields deliberately aimed to injure or kill anyone, either in days/weeks before Unite the Right, or on the day of, or in the moments before the incident. A lot more plausible is panic as his car was getting smashed by Antifa baseball bats and threatened with guns (Greg Conte’s article’s lead graphic; this is the first I had heard of the gun threat).
Fields should be found Not Guilty on these grounds, self defense or the like. He was trying to get out of town as Unite the Right collapsed following coward Mike Signer’s last-minute stab-in-the-back, “stand down” order.
Surely if Fields had come to Charlottesville to kill Antifa members, he would have done a whole lot differently, and surely he would have “bagged” more than one (at that, the one that died was perhaps the most physically unhealthy Antifa member among the anti Unite the Right group that day; and she died of a heart attack). Just look at the kill counts for Muslim vehicular terror in Europe…
A little more on Signer:
He and his wife Emily Blout are both Jewish. Their wedding announcement was published in the New York Times despite neither being from New York (Signer [born circa 1973] is from the Washington DC metro area; Blout [born circa 1984] is from the Boston area). The “Dictionary of American Family Names” gives Blout as an exclusively Jewish surname. Signer was covered favorably in the Jewish press in Israel for his crusade against White racialists.
Neither Emily Blout nor Michael Signer have any apparent longstanding ties to Charlottesville. One would think the mayor of a city would have local roots, either personal or perhaps by marriage. Signer’s ties date back to his showing up as a young adult to get a JD at the University of Virginia likely some time in the 2000s, apparently after his PhD from Berkeley. As of 2012, he had strong ties to Washington, D.C., where he worked and presumably lived.
Here is a snippet from his official mayoral bio — you know, those dry, ‘cookie cutter’ lists of life accomplishments:
This is rather unprofessional and undignified language from Mayor Signer; and — if I may say so — fascist rhetoric from Mayor Signer. “The right to peaceably assemble? Never! Run them out of town!”
Mike ‘By Deception Make War’ Signer seems to be a lifelong Democratic Party activist of its left-wing, as does his wife. This is likely the way they met; Blout was working as a press secretary for a Virginia Democratic Congressman before the marriage to Signer. She was also a DC area resident at this time, studying at National Defense University. (IOW, these are Deep Staters or wannabe Deep Staters.)
They were married in Charlottesville in 2012 and it is at this time that they may have become permanent residents of that city for the first time. A mere three years later, lifelong Democratic Party machine man Signer was elected to the city council (Nov. 2015), and appointed Mayor in Jan. 2016 by the city council. Unite the Right followed 18 months later.
It is hard to imagine a figure so cowardly, so deceitfully malicious, as Mike Signer, the architect of the Charlottesville fiasco. May his name live in infamy.
Thank you; well stated.
That mayor’s name: Michael Signer.
Signer is guilty of illegal suppression of peaceful assembly. Guilty of (essentially, literal) incitement to racial-political violence. Responsible for the death of one obese individual, and arguably also guilty for the police helicopter crash that killed two officers — Why was a helicopter needed for a run-of-the-mill demonstration? The helicopter incident further goes to show that Charlottesville was entirely a political stunt by the coward Mayor Signer; whether others are involved, as Greg Conte speculates, we don’t know. But we do know Signer’s direct role.
As they used to say about Seth Rich: “His name is Michael Signer.” Let it not be forgotten or dumbed-down to “the mayor.”
It’s a shame that Signer is Deep State, and it’s a shame that the Donald ‘Do Nothing’ Trump’s Justice Department is asleep at the switch (i.e., “Voted for Trump; got Jeb”). A prosecution of Michael Signer for illegal suppression of free speech could, in principle, be in the jurisdiction of the U.S. Justice Department, if it were actually in populist-nationalist hands.