The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Jean Marois Archive
Prison for a Cartoon in the France of Voltaire
The Persecution of Alain Soral
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Alain Finkielkraut recently stated: “Soral is the most dangerous and ominous character of the public scene.” To understand the significance of these words, you have to know who is Alain Finkielkraut, and who is Alain Soral.

Finkielkraut is one of our French neoconservatives. Formerly a Trotskyist, he is now a nationalist. He embodies what Soral calls National-Zionism, that new ideology massively promoted by Jewish “intellectuals” and media pundits who, after calling for the abolition of borders and drowning Europe in mass immigration, now tell the French people to turn to Israel as a model for dealing with Muslims.

Finky, as we like to call him, also embodies the arrogance of ethnocentric Jews who get an undeserved ubiquity on television complaining about anti-Semitism and the next Holocaust. It is true that, when Finkielkraut shows up in a Yellow Vest gathering, he will be called “Sale sioniste!” which, as everyone is supposed to know, means “Sale juif!” which in turn is a potential holocaust. And so, whenever Finkielkraut gets insulted in the street, which happens, it is national news, and the President himself has to make the standard declaration: “The anti-Semitic insults he has been subjected to are the absolute negation of who we are and what makes us a great nation. We will not tolerate them.” That is the kind of important person Finkielkraut is. Oh! and Finkielkraut has been elected in the prestigious Académie Française among those we call “the Immortals”, although it is unclear under what pretext. Like Bernard-Henri Lévy, Finkielkraut does write books that are more and more heavily promoted but less and less read.

Alain Soral is indeed the most dangerous person for the National-Zionists. And the French elite of the media-finance-political complex are justifiably worried about the “soralisation des esprits”, an expression that has surfaced in recent weeks, as Soral’s name is heard here and there among the Yellow Vests. So the National-Zionists couldn’t hide their joy when learning from the national press agency (AFP) on April 15 that Soral was sentenced to one year in prison with an arrest warrant “pour contestation de l’existence de la Shoah” (“for denying the existence of the Holocaust”), an expression which only makes sense, I believe, if the Holocaust is God.

Listen here to Soral’s own analysis of his sentence, with English subtitles.

Soral’s crime was the publication, on the website of his association “Égalité et Réconciliation”, of a parody of a Charlie Hebdo cover mocking the Shoah mythology. The original cover, on the left below, appeared after the terrorist attack in Belgium in March 2016, which made 35 dead and 300 wounded. According to the judges, the original cover is protected by free-speech law, while the parody is obviously a crime deserving one year imprisonment, not for the artist, but for the man whose association posted it on Internet.

This is not the first time Soral is convicted. He has faced 60 court cases in recent years, and been fined to a total of 371,000 euros. Significantly, he has never been condemned for the contents of his books or videos, but for cartoons and illustrations posted on his website. Here are a couple of them:

Last year, Soral was also put on trial for posting this photoshopped picture of Emmanuel Macron with his campaign slogan “En Marche” and three of his sponsors behind him, who happen to be Jewish: Jacob Rothschild (Macron worked for the Rothschild bank), Jacques Attali (a presidential adviser since Mitterrand, who boasts of having “put Macron’s foot on the stirrup”), and Patrick Drahi (Israeli owner of the major media that sold Macron to the French public).

Soral was finally discharged because a Socialist Party member named Gérard Filoche also tweeted this picture (then apologized), and the French court couldn’t decently convict Soral and not Filoche.

ORDER IT NOW

Soral is an essayist who has published best-selling polemical essays such as Vers la féminisation? – Démontage d’un complot antidémocratique (“Towards feminisation? – Analysis of an antidemocratic plot”). His latest book Comprendre l’Empire: Demain la gouvernance mondiale ou la Révolte des nations (“Understanding the Empire: Tomorrow global governance or an uprising of nations”), published in 2011, propelled him as one of the most insightful critic of the American-Zionist Machiavellian hubris.

Since then, Soral has produced about a hundred long videos commenting current events, some of them totaling half a million views, which is enormous for France. He has a real genius for producing analyses of deep politics and social issues that are profound, synthetic, and clear. He exposes in plain language the evil schemes of our elites and the lies of mainstream media. And he is not afraid to criticize this Jewish power that Gilad Atzmon defines as “the capacity to silence criticism of Jewish Power” (Atzmon’s books, by the way, are translated in French by Soral’s publishing company KontreKulture).

Soral has become the most outspoken critic of the “dictatorship of the CRIF (Conseil representative des Institutions juives),” the French equivalent of AIPAC and ADL combined. Thanks to the work of Soral and his team of investigators, literally millions of Frenchmen have become aware of the obscene power of the CRIF and their nefarious intrigue for criminalizing any criticism of Israel or Jewish power, under the pretext of fighting against “anti-Semitism”.

I once compared Soral to an exorcist, because by his very words, he forces the demons to come out and reveal themselves. He has become the bête noire of our corrupt political and media circus, and crystallizes their hatred. In 2014, Prime minister Manuel Valls had declared war on Soral as well as on his friend humorist Dieudonné, making it a national priority. This fury from the part of a statesman who declared, on a Jewish radio, being “eternally bond to Israel through my wife” contributed to both Vall’s discredit and Soral’s prestige, especially after Valls pathetically returned to his native Catalonia after his divorce.

Every sentence Soral receives makes him stronger, because it proves him right. Soral is uniquely dangerous because he never apologizes. He may very soon become the first Frenchman imprisoned for a political cartoon, and thereby the living proof that French democracy is dead. One year in prison is all he needs to write his next book: Mon Combat.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Alain Soral, Anti-Semitism, France, Jews 
Hide 208 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. anon[310] • Disclaimer says:

    A bittersweet article. Bitter, because of Jews destroying liberté. Yet the cartoons were sweet!

  2. It’s all about Benjamins and…..Jacobins

  3. Voltaire once wrote about Jews

    Quote All of the other people have committed crimes, the Jews are the only ones who have boasted about committing them. They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race. End Quote.

    It appears Voltaire was prescient.

    • Agree: Moi, Beefcake the Mighty
    • Replies: @Jake
    , @Moi
    , @YessirreeBob
  4. How many Jews live in France? Why are they blamed for France’s speech-suppression laws? There aren’t enough Jews left in France to blame. French Christians or secularists, the majority, could change their laws to support freedom of political speech, letting the majority of Holocaust believers challenge the minority of Holocaust deniers to a debate, rather than winning by jailing their debate competitors.

    The French take their cartoons seriously!

    In America, most artists are a running joke—associated as they are with poverty and underemployment. French punishment is severe and disproportionate when taking on either group via contour-line drawings, but whereas French Muslims shoot rebel cartoonists dead—execution style—anti-Holocaust-deniers just put the cartoon peddlers in jail.

    I don’t believe the Holocaust deniers, but none of those who support criminalizing political speech need to be making moralizing speeches about Stalin’s Gulag.

    Je Suis Gulag is more like it.

  5. Anon[105] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Dirty politics in Bananada.

    • Replies: @Genrick Yagoda
  6. Wally says:
    @Endgame Napoleon

    said:
    ” letting the majority of Holocaust believers challenge the minority of Holocaust deniers to a debate”

    – It’s been done repeatedly, The irrational True Believers have lost on every occasion. Examples provided upon request.

    That is why there are law against free speech, the ridiculous “holocaust” narrative cannot withstand rational, scientific scrutiny.

    said:
    “I don’t believe the Holocaust deniers, but none of those who support criminalizing political speech need to be making moralizing speeches about Stalin’s Gulag.”

    – Yet you demonize Revisionists by referring to them as “deniers”.

    – It is those like you who deny facts of science, rational thought and logic.

    – Now tell us why you believe in the impossible.

    “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”
    – so called “holocaust historian” Raul Hilberg

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Agree: freedom-cat, Alfred
  7. “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”

    Just as it is useless to close the stable door after the steed has bolted, fat good The Jews attempting to corral Soral after his message has already reached the public mind. They want to make an example of him so that we may serve them out of fear; they make of him only an example to follow.

    To paraphrase the Coen brothers, “You’re not God, LICRA, people just thought you were. Now that they’ve stopped thinking it, you’ll stop acting like it.”

    • Agree: annamaria
    • Replies: @c matt
  8. Mulegino1 says:

    The stifling of free expression in a society increases in direct proportion to the influence which the Jews exercise in it. This is principally due to the behavior of the Jewish collective, which, as its power increases, becomes ever more outrageous, litigious, and corrupt Its public face becomes one of bold effrontery and duplicity. This elicits an inevitable response among the host population, to which organized Jewry responds with its typical censoriousness and hypocrisy. This only increases the resentment and hostility of the people.

    The Jews- again, as a collective- are the world’s spoiled children, whose tantrums only increase in intensity as their wishes are accommodated by the useful idiots that they place and keep in power.

  9. The cartoons are vile, but opinion is (or should be) protected freedom of speech.

    • Agree: James N. Kennett
  10. Thanks to Jean Marois for writing this article, to Mr. Unz for publishing the article on his site and for one of the rare places where real freedom of expression is accepted. Also, in one of the few previous comments I’ve put up, thanks to all the people who are sharing their knowledge and insights on the various topics to be found at UNZ.

    On another article I had linked some of his videos, translated by other people, which I will repost here. I am also currently working on a translation of his latest interview where he is asked about this 1 year prison sentence and a few other things (duration of 35mins).

    Here again is the French AIPAC video, the “CRIF” 8 mins 47 seconds, from 2012.

    And a video of 38 mins back from 2013 where Soral clearly explains what he believes are some of the problems in France.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  11. Soral like Faurisson before, have become martyrs. They are both like the former christian martyrs for daring speaking out what they believe. Truth have become anathema for those running France and Justice has been turned into inquisition, sending to hell the new heathens, those who are opposing the New world order and/or the Zionists .

    The New world order had to be fought for having for objectives, the destruction of the European Christian society, its culture, its faith and the enslaving of the gentile; the zionists with their fanatism, hoax and terrorism are on the eve of triggering the third world war.

    Soral is some sort of Don Quichotte for he is fighting against the New world order and the Zionists which both are running the western world by having in theirs hands the puppets running the governments, the finance and the media. He is a hero trying to awake people before it is too late !

    • Agree: Mulegino1, Mike P, Robjil
    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
    , @Wally
  12. This affair reminds me of the old Soviet joke: “Of course people love artists here. We’re so passionate about them that we even jail them.”

  13. @Joe Neutral

    Why are they vile?

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  14. romar says:

    France’s political setup has really gone to the dogs…

  15. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Bill Jones

    Why are they vile?

    If you have to ask, you must be an antiSemite.

    • Replies: @Saggy
    , @Nonny
  16. @Mulegino1

    Jewish concept of freedom for the goyim:

    Freedom is the right to do that which the law allows.

    Source:

    The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

    PROTOCOL No. 12

    1 . The word “freedom, ” which can be interpreted in various ways, is defined by us as follows –

    2. Freedom is the right to do that which the law allows. This interpretation of the word will at the proper time be of service to us, because all freedom will thus be in our hands, since the laws will abolish or create only that which is desirable for us according to the aforesaid program.

    https://archive.org/stream/TheProtocolsOfTheLearnedEldersOfZion/ProtocolsOfTheEldersOfZion_djvu.txt

    Waters Flowing Eastward (1933) is a book written by the American born wife/widow of a Russian military officer explaining how “The Protocals” first surfaced. The books preface summarized the dynamics in play which result in the suppression of free expression:

    PREFACE

    It has been frequently observed that our civilization follows the course of the sun westward: from Greece to Rome, from Scandinavia and Germany to England, France and Spain, from Europe to America. It looks towards the west for fresh lands where it may build nobler cities and create more perfect forms of life, unhampered by the trammels of the past. It may be said that the west stands for independence of thought, free expression, and representative government: these principles are involved in the western conception of progress.

    Beneath this great westward flow of our civilization, there are undercurrents moving eastward. These are impelled by a spirit which looks back to the east, to the days of tyrant and slave, of luxury and misery, and incidentally the suppression of western culture. This spirit is retrogressive, though often calling itself ” Progress,” and its ways are devious. But the currents for which it is responsible are broad, deep and violent in their effect.

    http://educate-yourself.org/cn/WatersFlowingEastward.pdf

    • Agree: Mulegino1
    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
  17. While any criminalization of thought & expression is detestable, examples here are not well chosen. Finkielkraut, with all his faults, is a French patriot who had warned of possible ethnic swamping of France many times; Soral, on the other hand, is a charming monomaniac, obsessed with Jews & simultaneously not giving a squeak about ongoing Islamization & Africanization of France.

  18. @Jean de Peyrelongue

    Soral like Faurisson before, have become martyrs.

    The same thought came to my mind shortly after starting to read the article. This is one author I intend to return to.

  19. @Endgame Napoleon

    … but whereas French Muslims shoot rebel cartoonists dead—execution style—…

    Oh, give it up already.

    Have you nothing better to do than come here and post inanites? FYI, this is the 21st century, and you’re posting at UR; that means most of us goyim, and sometimes even a non-goy, know that such claims are BS.

  20. @Endgame Napoleon

    I’m certain it’s similar to Canada. In 1953, the Canadian Jewish Congress made their first presentation before parlaiment agitating for “Hate Speech” laws and “Hate Crime” laws. They continued with their agitation forming the COHEN commission, and even paid a 22 year old pretend Nazi alcoholic to try to arrange Nazi Rallies to be held in a park. (more than 1,500 Jews showed up, and no Nazis)

    Beattie’s group was infiltrated by Jews, and Beattie was set up in order to have “hate Speech” laws passed in Canada. And the Jews have been using them ever since, including when 4 Jew Judges on Canada’s Supreme Court declared that “truth is no defense” when it comes to Hate Speech.

    https://www.thespec.com/news-story/4817061-former-canadian-nazi-runs-for-office-in-ontario-s-cottage-country/

    https://www.macleans.ca/archives/my-16-months-as-a-nazi/

  21. @Anon

    Thanks for that video. For those who don’t know, Canadians are forced to endure every meeting opening with an homage to the Stone Age Siberians who were eating tree roots and one another before whitey showed up. Every public meeting opens up with “We acknowledge and would like to thank the XYZ Tribe, on whose land this meeting is conducted”. Even if the XYZ tribe was never closer than 500 miles to where the meeting is held.

    Canada is absolutely ground zero of Hate Whitey politics. Not even Sweden is close.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
    , @One tRibe
  22. @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    Fry is excellent. Here’s more.:

    Henceforth, Britain will do the bidding of her real masters ; she has
    become the tool of the schemers against all she holds dear, namely, her
    faith, her patriotism, traditions, civilisation. She grants the “ returned ”
    aliens equality of civil rights ; they may and do become mayors over
    Christian population, and within a short time Britain is ruled by a
    Jewish Prime Minister, Disraeli, first and foremost a Jew and the
    flunkey of the powerful Rothschild financiers.

    One of the consequences of this disastrous political mistake is the
    transformation of the national attitude of Great Britain and her
    colonies into that of the British Empire. Disraeli who inspired it
    knew what he was scheming for, the British people did not. But with
    him, Zionism is carried up to the very heights of the British Throne, a
    Zionist World Empire is on the high road to realisation.

    -Leslie Fry, “The Jews and the British Empire,” 1935

    … a
    Zionist World Empire is on the high road to realisation.

    Who is so purblind as to not see it or has the chutzpah to deny it?

  23. Hear that folks?

    Bardon instructs us that Finkielraut is a “patriot” because he warns about the “Islamist threat” to France. After all, that’s what made Napoleon great – right?

    However, Soral is apparently “monomaniacal” because he’s merely obsessed with the direct attack on the freedom of expression principally sponsored, carried out and enforced by CRIF and its fellow gang members and which now encompasses just about any possible criticism of “Zionism”. That’s what made Voltaire great too – right?

    Watching the demarcation of this debate going on in France is like watching the hasbara heads operate here on Unz: bashing musselmen is to be encouraged – just so long as that assault doesn’t blow back onto Zionism.

    • Agree: Jacques Sheete
    • Replies: @WalkingAlong
  24. lavoisier says: • Website
    @WalkingAlong

    Fascinating video.

    It is amazing how the playbook stays the same and how easy it is to gain total control of a culture.

    The problem is the same in France as it is here in the United States. Not enough men of courage and conviction to stand up to the Zionist bullies.

    That is why they are in charge.

    • Replies: @WalkingAlong
  25. anarchyst says:

    The “new religion” that jews have foisted on the world is “holocaustianity”.

    • Replies: @anon
  26. One Tribe says:

    Thank you for bringing this information to this publisher, so that I had the opportunity to read it.
    Thank you to the commenters.

    It is tragic, and… it could be said, more than a bit horrific to know of the real life events in the destruction of “western democratic institutions“.
    I am personally saddened by the destruction of one of the nicest places one used to be able to go to, to visit or live.

    I write again that the model of subversion of yet another nation, is incredibly well-trended, and is thus to a very real extent, predictable. This trend, unfortunately, always shows a subsequent destruction of the subordinated nation.

    I have yet to see much analysis, even in the alternative media, of how the burning of Notre Dame fits, like a key, into the corresponding ceremonial symbolic destruction/desecration that is also always part of this historic trend of subversion of nations.

    But the primary intent of my contribution, here, is to focus the discussion on the behaviours, and to the extent possible, avoid applying labels denoting some kind of inherent commonality beyond individuals deciding and acting/behaving, and in so doing, intrinsically accepting values of inherent discrimination and hatred against humanity.

    The affiliation discussed is ultimately bound only by their common consent and acceptance of systemic discrimination and hatred against humanity.

    That is all!

    Even if one (incorrectly, in my opinion) accepted the concept of ‘race‘, this referred to affiliation of adherents of Rabbanical Talmudism, in no way meet any scientifically determinable physiological commonality, nor shared heredity.

    The issue is with the shared behavioural traits, and supporting value structure which is the problem, and the (more or less) voluntary acceptance and adoption of those behaviour-constraining, and anti-social behaviour-directing dictums, which is what needs to be overcome.

    Any writing and/or social discourse, which in anyway, even passively, supports the acceptance of commonality of this affiliation beyond each individuals decision to accept his/her role with the affiliation, ultimately strengthens the affiliations ability to implement its agenda.

    In the case of the subject of this article, the behaviours at issue, are in the collective actions of adherents to this affiliation, corrupting the function of multiple ‘democratic‘ institutions, so that an individual, who is presenting material a. documenting and b. analyzing, the actions of the affiliation, in complete alignment with the founding values of the republic, is unfairly discriminated against, so as to stop the otherwise legal, (and some might even say a fundamental responsibility of citizenship in the republican democracy) actions of the individual to preserve the democracy.

    Summary:

    The essence of the issue is of activities of individuals, affiliated by voluntarily acceptance of a dangerously dysfunctional extreme anti-social behavioural code.

    It is an ideology, followed by a group of fanatics, and should be referred to as such, and treated, as such!

  27. Jake says:
    @Genrick Yagoda

    But he failed to discern that he possessed the Gentile French form, which indeed is milder and less insane, of the same fanaticism he descried in Jews – unrelenting hatred of Christ and Christendom.

    The Voltaires of the world never help because they are a major part of the problem. Jews piggyback them right into absolute power.

  28. @lavoisier

    Thanks lavoisier, and to Iris and Tsigantes who have also replied to a previous post. Just trying to share information with others, hoping to reach a better understanding of this mess and how we got here. I have no insights, merely sharing information from the different sources I come across. I’ll quote someone else: “I quote others to better express myself.”
    Far more capable people than me have already done the work; it’s there in books and in the heads of some who share their real life experiences and by their struggles help shed light on the problems we face.

  29. Understanding the Empire: Tomorrow global governance or an uprising of nations

    There is no English translation of this book on Amazon. Anybody want to propose a good English source of Soral’s writing?

    • Replies: @WalkingAlong
  30. anon[157] • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst

    The “new religion” that jews have foisted on the world is “holocaustianity”.

    Dr. Lorraine Day was saying this several years ago

  31. It is not anti semitism which is on the rise. It is simply the truth in relation to all of the deceptions which enabled one exclusive group to wield so much power so irresponsibly. Their leaders boast of owning and controlling just about everything which matters and then expect to be exempt from any criticisms as to some of the rather sociopathic means they used to achieve their prominence. Apart from the financial control and influences their leaders exercised in the 19th century, history is now revealing their virtual dominance in controlling finances and politics in the 20th century for their own advancement, which according to the Talmud is their right and their duty.

    From the banksters betrayal of Germany in 1916 and their pressures and inducements on GB to continue that war, with their control of the US also bringing it into it, it is difficult not to say that the entire course of the remainder of the 20th century, which was a century of extreme violence and and unrest, was not a direct result of the machinations of the real power brokers pulling everyone’s financial chain, as well as controlling not only most Western legislatures but the Kremlin as well.

    Trying to exterminate any ethic group is still a horrendous evil but the historical question to put things in perspective is what led to that? Yes, the victors got to write the narrative and the six million number is inflated. But, so what. The real question is how a nation like Germany could so suddenly turn its back on its Christian heritage and opt for the gods of Woden and Thor. The evidence is that the real rift went back to 1916.

    Like 9/11, the Zionists just keep parroting the official narrative which they created, and all of the establishment whores just keep spewing it out. As for 9/11 the truth seeking public has sifted the evidence and does not want anymore fake US trials. The evidence is already in and the judgement in the court of public opinion has been made. The emperor has no clothes. The ruthless methods Israel and the Zionist particularly in the Middle East is another direct reflection of an exclusive and plundering ethos behind the movement, and also a reflection of that in the minds of the power brokers like the Rothschild’s who have backed Zionism and take credit for creating Israel. As the deeds of 1916 determined the course of the 20th century we can only hope that as the truth about that century and 9/11 2001 unfolds that heros like Soral will be noticed and followed so that the people in the West can take back the control of their nations, their finances, their cultures and their lives. But perhaps we are mostly to blame. If we behave like cows then why should we complain when we treated like them.

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
    • Disagree: Grace Poole
    • Replies: @Grace Poole
    , @Wizard of Oz
  32. The only clear pathway, that I can see, for humanity to seize control of it’s very own future, and thus ensure a civilized existence for our children, is for every nation that has a central bank, for that nation to nationalize their central bank. It is only by controlling our own money supply that the Jews can hold onto the advantage they have over us, and by that advantage progress towards their vision of a 1 world government with the seat of power located in Jerusalem. And, for a glimpse of how that would end for both Christians and Moslems one need only research the Talmud, or read the many statements made by many rabbi’s to the effect we are worth less than cattle, and on earth for the one sole purpose, and that is to serve them so they may live like effendi. These are their words not mine.

    • Agree: Digital Samizdat
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  33. @aucontraire

    Spot on aucontraire! Jean-Marie le Pen, a real patriot, was warning about this for over 40 years and Finkielkraut’s tribal cousins, the media and the system, were spitting, insulting and calling him a horrible racist. The man has his flaws, as we all do, but he was honest in his fight and never backed down, never crawled begging for forgiveness.

    The media, always serving Power, worked wonders. I still remember when I was in my 10th grade civics course I mentioned France should be for the French in a derisive way, and a guy beside me laughed and said “alright Le Pen!” I laughed as well; agreeing and knowing without the slightest doubt how much of a horrible racist he was. Meanwhile, I had never read or heard a single thing Jean-Marie Le Pen had said that didn’t come from the news. Such certainties and convictions while being a grade-A ignoramus. Teenagers…. Makes you burn with shame when you look back.

    Alain Soral once said: “a journalist is either a whore or he’s out of work”.

  34. @simple_pseudonymic_handle

    Hi simple_pseudonymic_handle, I don’t know of any English translations of his books or texts. I’ll try to ask E&R or just translate some of them myself when I can. I only know there are videos are out there that people have translated (quality varies).

  35. Vojkan says:
    @Endgame Napoleon

    How many Jews in France? Unofficially (ethnic statistics are forbidden in France) 700,000. Most of them in and around Paris. Many of them in high positions. There’s a rule with Jews, one in is one too many as he will help his kin sneak in and in a shortwhile, your house won’t be your house any more. They will first make it public and then they will sell it for cheap to Jewish buyers. That’s what they do everywhere and France is no different.
    I have grown up in France and left for a short period when the socialists came to power. By the time I returned, I was amazed at how much the Jews had infiltrated French institutions in just a few years of socialist rule. To be clear, there were Jewish officials during de Gaulle’s rule, but their behaviour never incited doubt about their allegiance to France. There has always been a globalist clique infiltrated in French politics that couldn’t care less about French people but it never has been as blatant and outrageous as during the Mitterrand years. Free speech in France had already been attacked with laws voted under Pompidou and Giscard. The first major attack has been a law passed in 1972, the “loi Pleven”, that criminalised any form of “discrimination”, but the final nail in the coffin was the “loi Gayssot” in 1990 that effectively criminalised the objective study of History, as any finding going against the official truth could henceforth land its author in jail.
    From that point, France ceased to be a democracy and became a Zionist colony.

    • Replies: @Iris
  36. Anon[346] • Disclaimer says:

    If candidness and truth are stomped on all over the world in every matter from smallest to biggest, if the most popular and trusted are always those who lie best and most… there must be a cause to this.
    And what is it, or rather, who are they?
    A group of people that make up some 0.5% of the global human populace.

    So simple and comfy and reassuring — the kind of answer everyone loves.

  37. Anon[307] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    The goofy side of free speech:

  38. Moi says:
    @Genrick Yagoda

    Anyone know why these people are the way they are? Is it genetics, is it the Torah, is it the Talmud…???

  39. Mulegino1 says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    If you want to cure a disease, you attack the cause and not the symptoms.

  40. @Genrick Yagoda

    Yes, we have to endure it, and my norm is to mutter, not so quietly, “Oh shit, not again.”
    No mention is made of the ancient “first nations” accounts of the people they slaughtered – the red-haired “giants”.
    The illusion that they lived in harmony with nature is absolute well rotted male bovine excrement. When they hunted, they killed as many as they could, whenever they could boars/bucks, sows/does, and cubs/fawns in every season, just like they slaughtered each other. If fishing, it was the same thing. They were nomadic, because they had driven the prey into hiding.
    I hold no grudge against them. but it is becoming a farce. The idea that the treaties were meant to give back massive tracts of land that had been conquered or bought is ludicrous. The man responsible for the treaties continually thought we had a responsibility for the Stone Age Siberians who have been dis-possessed of their land.
    Next year I suspect we will have land claims filed by the Chosen tribe saying they were really here first, and that YHWH promised them the land.

    • Replies: @Genrick Yagoda
  41. Iris says:
    @Vojkan

    From that point, France ceased to be a democracy and became a Zionist colony.

    Sad but entirely correct.

  42. Vojkan says:
    @Moi

    I don’t think they’re all that way, I happen to be personally acquainted with a few who aren’t. As my character, my personal ethics, my way of reasoning vastly differ from those of any of my relatives, I am wary of the genetical explanation, and as I regard both the Torah and the Talmud more as consequences of an already existing collective outlook on the world rather than its cause, I think that a valid appraisal of why so many Jews do so many bad things so systematically would require a thorough scientific study. The thing is, goyim are strongly advised against endeavouring on such terrain, the penalty for such an audacity being social death. The goyim are only allowed to praise Jews not study them, because studying them would mean putting in doubt their angelic purity, and doubting that Jews are God’s gift to the mankind is worse than blasphemy. It is simply verboten.
    We are therefore limited to make the observation that Jews indeed systematically commit a lot of misdeeds but we mustn’t try to understand why.

  43. Iris says:

    Alain Soral is indeed the most dangerous person for the National-Zionists

    Over the past decade, Alain Soral has accomplished an outstanding work in raising political awareness of ordinary people about the globalists’ shenanigans.

    His insight is reflected in the political maturity of the “Gilets Jaunes” national movement, where his influence is noticeable.

    During this hard time where so many people are crushed by the Zionist Iron Heel, he stands out, almost alone, for his courage. Kudos to him.

    • Agree: Tsigantes
  44. Excellent article, Mr. Marois, even if the news is bad.

    I first heard of Alain Soral through the Saker and started following his VK feed a few years ago. I haven’t read any of his books, since my French just isn’t that good, but I hear they’re excellent. It’s ironic that both Soral and Assange have been taken prisoner within a month of each other for committing the crime of free speech–ironic and sad.

    As far as this ‘national Zionism’ business is concerned, trust me: the French aren’t the only ones having to put up with it. In America, we have not only national Zionists but Christian Zionists as well; and the latter follow the former around, like so many goyishe cattle headed for the slaughterhouse. Sad …

    But it’s good to see that, as bad as things are, the French people have not given up or given in completely. It’s good to see that the spirit of resistance is still alive and well. I wish both Alain Soral and the gilets jaunes all the best in their struggle against tyranny.

  45. @the grand wazoo

    You are surely a troll whose purpose is to associate criticism of Jews and of Israel with mental disorder. That you think or pretend to think that central banls are not nationalised is so crazily away with the pixies that you could find your family worrying about your capacity to manage uour affairs.

  46. @Genrick Yagoda

    Voltaire was correct. The Jews murdered Jesus and rebelled against God, which according to Dr. E Michael Jones, made them revolutionaries forever. Zionism is an enemy to Mankind.

    • Replies: @Miggle
    , @Jacques Sheete
  47. @Curmudgeon

    During the negotiations for Treaty 10, James A.J. McKenna treaty commissioner told the Indians;

    QUOTE I pointed out to them that the government could not undertake to maintain the Indians in idleness; that the same means of earning a livelihood would continue after the treaty was made as existed before it; and that Indians would be expected to make as good use of them in the future as in the past END QUOTE

    I guess that part of the treaty didn’t take too well, since they have had their hands out for more than a trillion dollars since then.

    As to whether or not they lived in harmony, only a few years ago the bones of 498 women and children were unearthed at Crow Creek. It seems their men were on the losing side of a battle with some other tribe, and after murdering and scalping all the men, the victorious tribe proceeded to murder, scalp and eat every single one of the almost 500 women and children. And we know this from the cut marks on their bones.

    Why we are forced to pretend anything other than these “people” were complete Stone Aged Savages is beyond me. Faith Goldie did a great job at the beginning of that video, but I long for the day when someone stands up and states, “Today we acknowledge we are on the land where the Mic’Mac ate the Beothuk off the face of the earth in their typical savage manner”.

  48. One tRibe says:
    @Genrick Yagoda

    GY:

    Indeed, Canada has come to be in a pre-collapse state, like most of the empire.

    The subversions by the international gang of haters of humanity, many living and working towards their affiliations objectives, even when they are in direction contradiction of the best interests of the nationstate of Canada, has resulted in the undermining of democratic institutions and you can see people abandoning their responsibilities under the relationship between society and the individual, simply because society is not delivering to them; it’s all being stolen by the secretly operating extra-national affiliation of haters of humanity.

    To your comment.
    Yes, the extremist political correctness cabal is tedious to endure.
    On the issue of First Nations, I hope you might consider a broader context.

    The Canada that exists today is almost exclusively a colonial project.

    And while it may have many aspects which can be held up as noble, in the end, it was a colonial project, which at its basis was a kleptocratic genocide.

    I would like to clarify that since I don’t agree to the basic concepts of racial differentiation (certainly, at the very least, as the basis of discrimination), one must consider the concept of ‘genocide‘ to ultimately be cultural.

    Certainly, a culture may be decimated by destroying all of the individuals living according to a given culture, and in our colonial Canada, systemic disadvantaging of the First Peoples has greatly contributed to increased mortality and decreased social mobility.

    With a clear perspective, and observance of the facts, one can see that the genocide against the First Peoples, is still well underway, and has almost accomplished the implicit end objective, irrecoverable destruction of the cultures of the First Peoples, and therefore, success in the grand theft of the land and resources.

    Okay, so why is this relevant? (good question!)

    It is relevant, because what we see in France, and all countries under the auspices of the empire, is a colonial displacement project, very, very similar to the genocide against the First Peoples.

    What is happening in Palestine is happening everywhere!

    So, to get out of hypocrisy, as a society, we need to actually practice resistance to genocide, in all its forms. Acknowledgement of the First Peoples is a (albeit tepid) good step, and the national policy must be changed to enforce antagonism to genocidal programs underway everywhere.

    Nobody could be blamed for an adverse reaction to the political correctness gestapo, certainly brought to us by the manipulators of societies and the hubristic “by way of deception” warmongers, at the same time, this one, the acknowledgement of the genocide, and universal rejection of it, is a necessary building block to fight the enemies of humanity.

    • Replies: @Genrick Yagoda
  49. Saggy says: • Website
    @CanSpeccy

    I am a bot, triggered by ‘antisemite’.

    Antisemitism is the only rational response to the machinations of the Jews, the most egregious are–

    #1 – The Jewish religion posits that the mashiach will arrive, rebuild the temple, and conquer and subjugate all nations of the world, ushering in the olam ha ba, or world to come. In the world to come all non-Jews will serve the Jews and be subject to Jewish laws for gentiles only known as the Noahide laws. The Noahide laws are already formulated, the usual penalty for transgression is decapitation – see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah and
    and Rabbi Schneerson and Bibi discussing the mashiach,

    and a young Jewish yeshiva student discussing the mashiach and the wars to come


    #2 – The US military acting in the interests of Israel has turned four countries in the ME, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria, into killing fields, with millions dead, and even greater destruction likely in the future, with the next target being Iran. See
    https://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/john-mearsheimer/the-israel-lobby
    and

    #3 – The Jews are actively destroying western culture with cultural Marxism, see

    and destroying western populations with unrestricted 3rd world immigration, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-tvGcZ1Snk

    #4 – The holohoax is a preposterous and degenerate hoax that is promoted by nearly every Jew on the planet, and that is being used to destroy western civilization. For a 12 minute red pill see –

    for a 30-minute red pill see – https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ul72dV4SbAoh/

  50. One tRibe says:
    @Vojkan

    Luckily, some extremely courageous people have studied “them”, and, of course, as you have pointed out, subsequently had to deal with all sorts of harassment and challenges to the existence within the societies from which they were raised.

    While I don’t agree with everything he presents, Michael A. Hoffman has published a great contemporary analysis, “Judaism’s Strange Gods“, which was available by… the usual online megamonopoly, but now I think you would have to go to Mr. Hoffman’s site, at https://www.revisionisthistory.org/

    I also recommend the godfather of this subject of literary analysis in Douglas Reed’s seminal “The Controversy of Zion“, which is available online; as always, please take precautions while on the internet to protect your anonymity and privacy by a reputable VPN service provider and advanced software protective measures.

  51. @One tRibe

    You and I are in extreme opposite ends of this equation. You see yourself as a victim of those who hate humanity. I see you as a tool of those who hate humanity.

    The Stone Age Siberians who immigrated to North America had not advanced one single decade since they first set foot on the place. You certainly weren’t first, you never were nations, and you had no claim to anything, any more than the deer who migrated looking for better food sources.

    The Crow Creek Massacre I referred to above was committed in around the year 1,300 AD. Long before a single modern white man arrived. Without whitey’s intervention, it’s doubtful you would have survived at all, given your way of life was primarily war, theft, and violence. In 1867, there were around 80,000 of you in the vastness of Canada. Under whitey’s benevolence, you have grown to some number of millions today.

    I make no apologies for anything. We did not genocide you, it’s the complete opposite. And for the last 50 years, you have been used as the single most oppressive tool to drive the country into debt, and to drive white children into the self loathing that most of them feel, too guilt ridden to stand up for themselves in the face of the destruction of their country and their people.

    Your noble savage BS will fall on deaf ears where this commentor is concerned. Although you are not directly responsible, you are a willing participant in the same fraud that is being perpetrated on Canadians. In other words, you are playing for their team.

    • Replies: @One Tribe
  52. I don’t understand French very well, and I have not spoken the language since many many years, but this is clearly irrelevant when you see these brilliant cartoons. This transcends borders and language boundaries, and it is clearly legible and understandable to us all. My oh my, they are indeed quite clever. Got a chuckle out of me. Cheers

  53. Alfred says:
    @Joe Neutral

    The cartoons are vile

    But shooting defenceless Palestinians in the biggest concentration camp in the world – Gaza – is not vile according to our Zionist-controlled mass media. In fact, it is unreported and if it is ever reported the Palestians are accused of being terrorists.

    • Agree: Iris, Jacques Sheete
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  54. Wally says:
    @Jean de Peyrelongue

    Concerning the late great, Dr. Robert Faurisson:

    The ever changing fake Auschwitz numbers:
    https://forum.codoh.com/search.php?keywords=faurisson&t=5631&sf=msgonly

    The fake ‘Gas Chamber’ of Auschwitz I, By DR. Robert Faurisson : https://codoh.com/library/document/2852/?lang=en

    Dr. Faurisson shreds J.C Pressac’s ‘gas chambers’: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6457

    Revisionist Historian, Dr. Robert faurisson, Suffers Savage Beating: https://codoh.com/library/document/300/?lang=en
    much more on Dr. Faurisson: https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=faurisson+

    http://www.codoh.com

  55. @Fred Baggins

    Trying to exterminate any ethic group is still a horrendous evil but the historical question to put things in perspective is what led to that?

    Yes, that’s one question but the first question is, Did it happen?
    The next question, in conjunction with your query, is WHEN did the alleged holocaust happen?

    Do the exercise for yourself:

    When did Hitler come to power?
    What happened to Jews when Hitler came to power?
    Why did Hitler and NSDAP do what they did?
    What did Jews do immediately after Hitler came to power?
    Who engineered those things that Jews did?
    Why did Jews do what they did?

    Attach the numbers — the years — to the events.

    You wrote:

    Yes, the victors got to write the narrative and the six million number is inflated. But, so what. The real question is how a nation like Germany could so suddenly turn its back on its Christian heritage and opt for the gods of Woden and Thor. The evidence is that the real rift went back to 1916.

    You have taken the wrong path and are lost in the woods.

    – Arguing over the number is meaningless.
    – “The real question” that you posit is not a real question at all; it is based on the unsubstantiated assumption that such a thing as a holocaust of Jews took place.

    -In 1942, USA began testing the most efficient way to create firestorms to incinerate German civilians and destroy German workers housing.

    In a discussion with Chris. Hitchens, ethicist A C Greyling said that “the firebombing was immoral, but it would have been more immoral to have failed to have defeated the Nazis.”

    Was there a holocaust in 1942?
    What great, “immoral” thing had Germans done in/by 1942 that made the war crime and crime against humanity of deliberately planning and carrying out the incineration of German civilians — specifically targeting “infants in their cribs” — morally permissible?

    In a meeting on June 11, 1944, David Ben Gurion, head of the Jewish agency in Palestine, conveyed the consensus view of the group: they believed that Auschwitz was a labor camp, and would not, therefore, ask the Allies to bomb Auschwitz “lest a single Jew be killed.”

    No holocaust in 1944, yet Allies have been bombing German cities for over a year, “de-housing” 7 million German civilians, killing god only knows how many women and children, on the way to the reduction to dust of 131 German cities, 70% of Germany’s infrastructure.

    In “Capturing the German Eye,” author Cora Sol Goldstein wrote that the images recorded by (Jewish Hollywood studio) videographers and photographers who accompanied US forces as they entered the concentration camps in the Spring of 1945

    ” became, retroactively, the defining representation of the Nazi genocidal project.”

    https://books.google.com/books/about/Capturing_the_German_Eye.html?id=d-Qyqp15fDkC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button#v=snippet&q=retroactively&f=f

    We know for a fact that at least some of the images captured in the camps were bogus:
    – the shrunken heads, lampshades and soap of Jewish flesh was fable, recanted by Jewish authors.
    – Nordhausen was bombed and shot up by Allied forces, but photographed, blamed on the Germans, and those photos used as evidence at Nuremberg to hang Germans.

    In short: Not until 1945, AFTER war crimes had been committed against the German people in order to bring about their unconditional surrender and prostration was evidence recorded (or contrived) to support the claim that Nazis were so immoral that Allied war crimes planned in 1942 and carried out in 1943 – 1945, were legitimized.

    Allied immoral acts preceded the casus belli.

    In a situation of such momentous import, the fact that the shrunken heads and soap-and-lampshades evidence was falsified, destroys the credibility of every other claim.

    Dr. Kevin Barrett was correct: “The Holocaust is a Myth that Conceals our Shame.”

    Please, people, rearrange your thinking: it is a failure of critical analysis to begin your argument with the premise that the holocaust (of Jews) narrative is valid.

    (nb. Your suggestion that Germans “turned their back on Christianity,” and your shot at “the gods of Woden and Thor” are mistaken and misguided. Not only did Germans not “turn their backs on Christianity,” the were busily engaged in attempting to redefine ways for Germans to express Christianity that excised the murderous gods of the Old Testament. A century + earlier, Thomas Jefferson did the same exercise.
    As to “Woden and Thor” — each culture is defined by its own traditions, folk tales and ancient myths. One of the healthiest things Germans did was to revitalize the myths that form a cultural bond for their people.
    One of the tragedies that makes it possible for the American people to be so easily divided against each other is the lack of a unifying myth. )

  56. glib says:

    should I visit Paris in the near future, how can I buy one or more of Soral’s books?

    • Replies: @Iris
  57. anon[275] • Disclaimer says:
    @Endgame Napoleon

    I don’t believe the Holocaust deniers, but none of those who support criminalizing political speech need to be making moralizing speeches about Stalin’s Gulag.

    this shouldn’t be your default position

    look into it a little bit and you’ll find that lots of lies have been told, enough so that you don’t really have any obligation to believe their holohoax tale

    they have a lot of explaining to do

  58. anon[275] • Disclaimer says:
    @Vojkan

    The thing is, goyim are strongly advised against endeavouring on such terrain, the penalty for such an audacity being social death. The goyim are only allowed to praise Jews not study them, because studying them would mean putting in doubt their angelic purity, and doubting that Jews are God’s gift to the mankind is worse than blasphemy. It is simply verboten.

    they become irate when the cattle turn the tables and put them under the microscope

  59. nosoygoy says:

    “National-Zionism” shortens to “NaZi”.
    “National Socialism” shortened to “NaSo”.

    Bolshevik, Trotskyite, Socialist, Neo-conservative, Liberal, Anarchist.
    All the same people.

  60. Tungarian says:
    @Endgame Napoleon

    but whereas French Muslims shoot rebel cartoonists dead—execution style—anti-Holocaust-deniers just put the cartoon peddlers in jail.

    Both responses are wrong but then it tells you who is actually ruling France and other western ‘nations’. or as I call them ‘cuckeries’

  61. @Joe Neutral

    The cartoons are actually terrific and do what humour is supposed to do, present an alternate perspective. A joke will wound according to its truth content. You don’t have to like them and by describing them as vile, clearly you don’t. Perhaps Larson is more your cup of Earl Grey?

    • Replies: @atlantis_dweller
  62. @Wizard of Oz

    Is it ignorance, delusion or have you been at the sherry again?

  63. Is it just that you can’t resist the urge to be gratuitously rude or do you really think the world’s central banks are private non-nationalised like the Rothschilds-manipulated-Wilson-in-1913 comic book economists who turn up on UR? The curious structure of the Fed does of course confuse the simple minded though be it noticed, even by the dimmest that it was the President trying to appoint Steven Moore to the Fed and the Senate, not private owners, who were the barrier.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  64. @Grace Poole

    You might care to try and understand the distinction between the bombing of German cities, against which much can be and has been said, and the deliberate policy of many people high in the Nazi government to solve the Jewish problem, from about the time of the invasion of the USSR by exterminating them. In principle the people in cities where German industry was concentrated could have been evacuated to tent cities in the countryside. Jewish children and old people were deported from cities which were not being bombed solely to facilitate the final solution.

    • Replies: @Grace Poole
  65. @Fred Baggins

    Would you be so good as to spell out what you are referring to when you write of the 1916 banksters betrayal of Germany and what the primary evidence for it is. That the 1917 Balfour declaration was the follow up to negotiations with American and other Zionists intended to get America into the war is hardly in doubt but you seem to be referring to something quite different.

  66. Anonymous[191] • Disclaimer says:

    They tried to destroy Zundel, they couldn’t, they tried to destroy Faurisson, and now they are trying to destroy Soral, they can’t. The more they try to silence the truth about jewish power, the more the truth will get out.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  67. @Jack Highlands

    Good joke, indeed. Although I don’t believe Soral musters the kind of broad international institutional and financial support that the other guy had in 1923!

  68. Lisa says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Finkielkraut, with all his faults, is a French patriot

    Wrong.
    Here are Finkielkraut’s own words:
    “Je suis né à Paris mais je suis le fils d’immigrants polonais. Mon père a été déporté de France. Ses parents ont été déportés et ont été assassinés à Auschwitz. Mon père est rentré d’Auschwitz en France. Ce pays mérite notre haine : ce qu’il a fait à mes parents fut bien plus violent que ce qu’il a fait aux Africains.”
    (I was born in Paris but I’m the son of Polish immigrants. My father was deported from France. His parents were deported and assassinated in Auschwitz. My father came back from Auschwitz to France. This country deserves our hatred: what it did to my parents is much more violent than what it did to Africans.)

    • Agree: Vojkan
    • Replies: @anon
  69. Bill65 says:

    Mr. Soral does not deserve to spend one hour in prison let alone a year. Surely the people of France cannot allow this to happen

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  70. anon[843] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lisa

    I was born in Paris but I’m the son of Polish immigrants. My father was deported from France. His parents were deported and assassinated in Auschwitz. My father came back from Auschwitz to France. This country deserves our hatred: what it did to my parents is much more violent than what it did to Africans.

    he goes with “this country” to blame all French but what did his people do to Africans?

    maybe he’d like to be blamed for Genrik Yagoda and the bolsheviks too?

  71. lesmis says:

    So 500k-700k members of the 67-ish million population of France can dictate what the rest of the country can say about a particular topic and have them imprisoned and punished if they don’t obey?

    That doesn’t sound like egalite – it sounds like a bunch of over-active and over-indulged lobbyists on a supremacist high.

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  72. PeterMX says:
    @Endgame Napoleon

    I wish I could find an article I once read every time I need to, to make a point. The Jews have enormous power over every European country, the USA, every western country and even in countries like Japan, The are the world’s leading power, not the USA (which they dominate).

    The poet turned historian Dr. Robert Faurisson, a holocaust negationist did great work exposing the lies of the “holocaust”. He was repeatedly attacked and beaten by French Jewish thugs and the French courts let the Jews get away with it for 40 years, basically telling Faurisson to change his opinion. In one article he describes being in a French court where several Jews continuously attacked him and the police did nothing. They just stood there. Those were their orders. That is the power they have in France, Germany, Great Britain, all over Europe and the USA.

    How many Jews are there in the USA. About 2% of the population, but BDS and anti-Semitism (which is whatever Jews don’t like) has been outlawed in several American states, never mind the constitution.

    The holocaust has already been largely disproven so that the claims are now completely different than they once were. The allies and Jews have been exposed as gross liars.

    All over Europe, lawyers, historians and others have been thrown in jail for saying things Jews don’t like.

    This German lawyer was jailed at least twice, including just a few years ago for making this speech to a free speech advocacy group in Switzerland. How many Jews are there in Switzerland? Not many.

    AZK – Sylvia Stolz – Lawyer Who Was Jailed for Presenting Evidence in the Zundel Trial (full)

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
    , @anon
  73. Iris says:
    @glib

    You can buy Alain Soral’s books online.
    They are produced by his own publishing house, Kontre Kulture.

    https://www.kontrekulture.com/

    Kontre Kulture is an excellent publishing house. It is much commendable for having translated and made available for the first time to the French public, the works of demonised authors such as Ezra Pound, Eustace Mullins, Douglas Reed..

  74. @Wizard of Oz

    Rude? Good grief! I was being more than kind to you by including the option that your cognitive dissonance may simply be due to the over consumption of sherry. A rude person would just have stated that you are a deluded fool and an arsehole to boot. I would never do such a thing, however appropriate it would be to do so.

    • Replies: @Grace Poole
    , @Anonymous
  75. Vojkan says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    “Finkielkraut, with all his faults, is a French patriot”

    LOL. Though there are folks in France who fall for it. Granted, Finkielkraut is very clever and cultured but he is a Zionist and doesn’t give a hoot about France. The only reason he is “giving a squeak” about the ongoing invasion of France y Muslims is because, well, unlike the French who are a quite tolerant, live and let live bunch, those folks happen to truly hate Jews.

  76. Vojkan says:
    @Bill65

    Nobody asks the people of France. Nobody asked them when their will expressed through a referendum on the European Constitution was ignored. Nobody asked them when same-sex marriage was legalised and adoption rights were granted to homosexual couples. Nobody asked them when the highly profitable and perfectly maintained French highways or the Roissy airport were privatised for a song. Why do you think the Yellow Vests movement happened?
    The uninvited guests of France who have long overstayed their welcome are simply abusing the French disinclination to violence.

  77. @NoseytheDuke

    Earl Grey tea, my favourite. The only one I find pleasure in drinking, actually.

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  78. Vojkan says:
    @atlantis_dweller

    That’s because you haven’t tasted organic Darjeeling whole leaf first flush. Though it is a bit expensive. As everyday tea, I still prefer Chinese Dianhong. Earl Grey is not real tea.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  79. @Jacques Sheete

    A brilliantly insightful and prescient woman, indeed, with remarkable courage.

    Reportedly born Louise A. Chandor (February 16, 1882 – July 15, 1970) of American parents living in Russia, pen name L. (Leslie) Fry, Russian married Paquita Louise de Shishmareff (married in Russia in 1906, husband Feodor Ivanovich Shishmarev, an officer in the Russian Imperial Army, was murdered in 1917 by the Jew Bolsheviks), reportedly her name is given as Paquita Deshishmaref in the US SSDI (Social Security Death Index).

    Called by wikipedia “an antisemitic, pro-Christian activist”. Can there be any higher earthly honor?

    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
  80. Vojkan says:
    @lesmis

    Well if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, chances are it is a duck. So maybe it is indeed what it sounds like. Something I experienced during my years at university in France in the 1990s.

  81. geokat62 says:
    @Vojkan

    I think that a valid appraisal of why so many Jews do so many bad things so systematically would require a thorough scientific study.

    I’d recommend Prof. KMac’s Culture of Critique, but it’s been banned by Amazon.

  82. annamaria says:
    @Endgame Napoleon

    The GULAG organizers were Bolshevik Jews. For instance, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naftaly_Frenkel

    Naftaly Frenkel is best known for his role in the organisation of work in the GULAG. …

    Frenkel presided over the development of the nourishment scale, or the “you-eat-as-you-work system”… In practice the system divided prisoners very rapidly into those who would survive and those who would perish. …

    Frenkel ensured that everything that did not contribute to the camp’s economic productivity was discarded…

    Some remembered him as a dandy … Others hated and feared him… “thanks to his horribly insensitive initiatives, millions of unhappy people are overwhelmed by terrible labour, by atrocious suffering.”

  83. annamaria says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    “Finkielkraut is a French patriot.”
    — Wrong.

    1. Finkielkraut has been active in destroying some of the most important achievements of French culture and western civilization, such as the freedom of speech and freedom of information.

    2. Has Finkielkraut ever protested the ongoing Wars for Israel in the Middle East? No? He has actually approved the French bombing of Libya? — Then he is the cause of the stream of refugees from those Middle Eastern countries that have experienced the EU/US “humanitarian interventions” (the Supreme Crime of War of Aggression, see Nuremberg Protocols).

    A related Q:
    Has Finkielkraut ever protested the Jewish State’s material support for neo-Nazi in Ukraine and Daesh in the Middle East? Never? — It is Bibi who should be put in a prison (not Soral) both for Bibi’s active “Holocaust denial” — providing Israeli rifles to Ukrainian neo-Nazis — and Bibi’s promotion of nationalistic hatred by the Israel-loved Banderites.

    Soral is an honest and intelligent person. Finkielkraut is not: he is a zionist.

    • Replies: @Iris
  84. @Wizard of Oz

    “. . .and the deliberate policy of many people high in the Nazi government to solve the Jewish problem, from about the time of the invasion of the USSR by exterminating them. “

    If you can supply solid evidence for your assertion, show it.
    Otherwise, logic demands that you recant your claim, as it is unsupported.

    In principle the people in cities where German industry was concentrated could have been evacuated to tent cities in the countryside.

    The firebombing campaign was not directed solely toward “cities where German industry was concentrated.” We know this, not least from documents produced by the US government Department of the Interior, that a deliberate policy of “morale-bombing,” specifically targeting working-class German civilians, to the extent that planning contemplated killing “young families with infants in cribs.”

    Your third assertion:

    “Jewish children and old people were [a.] deported from cities which were not being bombed [b.] solely to facilitate the final solution.

    This fails on several counts:
    a. Jews were “deported from Paris.” Paris was bombed. By Allies. Jews were deported from Berlin. Allies bombed Berlin. QED

    b. If Jews were deported “solely to facilitate the final solution,” why were they given medical attention; why was extensive attention paid to their hygiene; why were they numbered; why did the Jewish agency in Palestine, that apparently was aware of the existence and nature of Auschwitz, state in a communication on June 11, 1944 that “they believed Auschwitz was a labor camp;” why did so many survive; why did survivors of the camps that existed “solely to facilitate the final solution” demand and receive compensation for their labor?

    It’s remarkable that in contrast to your assertion, above, that “many people high in the Nazi government” formed the “deliberate policy” of “exterminating” the Jewish people, no such documents have so far been found to support that claim. On the other hand, there is documented proof that persons high in the Allied governments; namely, Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill themselves, ordered the development, planning and execution of deliberate campaigns of the “extermination” by firebombing of German civilians.

    Refute these facts and my arguments if you can, Wizard of Oz.
    If you cannot, the intellectually honest thing to do is to concede that your claims are false.

  85. Marmitica says:

    Voltaire himself has said -“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

  86. Rurik says:

    I haven’t read all the comments, but just wanted to chime in with this thought..

    For my entire life, I’ve been barraged with ranting hysterics about ‘those evil Germans’ who persecuted the Jews!!!’ (Gas chambers!!!, blah, blah, blah..)

    Especially coming from Brits and the French and Russians.

    OK, so this thread is about the French. So I’ll just say that watching the smug of the French all these decades, taking their sanctimonious, ‘superior’ shit in Germany’s face all these generations, that on some level it’s sort of satisfying to see the French get the “Jew’ treatment, but good.

    Germany suffered betrayal at Versailles, and the consequent enslavement under the ((Weimar regime)). All to the chuckles of Frenchmen everywhere.

    How was life under Vichy, France? Compared to life under the tender mercies of the Jewish supremacist today, eh?

    France is going to descend into a dystopian hell on earth. Your cities and towns will be overrun. Your children will become the playthings of sexual monsters. Your traditions and heritage will be mocked and demonized, as will your ancestors, as anti-Semites and “racists’.

    There is no depth of depraved hatred that will not be brought down upon the French people by their ((new masters)).

    And as your cathedrals and burned to the ground, and your lands and cities and towns are violated..

    .. the only thing that seems a certainly to me, is that the French will cling to their snide arrogance to the last breath, as they continue to pretend that they were and always will be the moral superiors of those ‘evil Germans’, who tried to free themselves (and the French) from the clutches of the Fiend.

    Sadly, the only hope for France is for them to do an impossible act of self-reflection, over the last century’s horrors, and come to an epiphany that the Nazis were right. And that Europe was in a battle for its very existence during WWII, a battle they lost. Today’s antics are simply the consequences of that historic loss. Duh.

    And that there is no devil’s deal you can make with a Zionist, Jewish supremacist, except to agree to enslave your people over to their tender mercies. Just as Macron has done and is doing.

    One wonders.. at what point would a Frenchman ever allow himself to see the obvious truth, that Nazi Germany was the last gasp of hope for Europe?

    And that by burning Germany to the ground, and keeping your sanctimonious boot on her humiliated neck, all these decades, that all you’ve done is planted the seeds of your own inevitable slog into the (((abyss))).

    Better to live as a Palestinian, than to ever question your great “victory” over the Nazis, huh?

    (and I’m speaking to Brits and Russians and Poles and Americans and everyone else who likes to puff up their chests and wax all morally superior to those evil Nazis, who tried to save the planet from the Jewish supremacists that are today, menacing all of your/our nations. Duh!)

    • Troll: Mike P
    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Jacques Sheete
    , @refl
  87. @Grace Poole

    I am finally learning to respond to my feelings of guilt about the time I waste on hopelessly mediocre UR threads and, if you want to know why I class you with those whose credibility would be crushed by half an hour’s cross-examination by even moderately capable trial counsel (or by court of appeal judges hearing you in an appeal court) spend $1000 on the time of a smart young trial counsel who might help you out. Good bye.

  88. Rurik says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    That you think or pretend to think that central banls are not nationalised is so crazily

    the lady doth protest!

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  89. @Wizard of Oz

    Just when I was firming up a comparison between the relentless dissemination of contrived pictures of “the extermination camps,” beginning by May, 1945 and used “retroactively” to “define” Nazi barbarity, and these paragraphs from Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse Five:

    I happened to tell a University of Chicago professor at a cocktail party about the raid as I had seen it, about the book I would write. He was a member of a thing called The Committee on Social Thought. And he told me about the concentration camps, and about how the Germans had made soap and candles out of the fat of dead Jews and so on.
    All I could say was, ‘I know, I know. I know.’
    . . .
    I wrote the Air Force back then, asking for details about the raid on Dresden, who ordered it, how many planes did it, why they did it, what desirable results there had been
    and so on. I was answered by a man who, like myself, was in public relations. He said that he was sorry, but that the information was top secret still.
    I read the letter out loud to my wife, and I said, ‘Secret? My God-from whom?’

    all for nought.
    the pitiful story of my tragic victimized life.

    But — bidness is bidness:

    Your comment #90 bleats that you cannot present evidence to support your position, nor can you refute the evidence and arguments I presented.

    And you do not have the intellectual integrity or moral courage to attempt a defense, or to concede the errancy of your claims.

    h/t Nosey the Duke: “A rude person would just have stated that you are a deluded fool and an arsehole to boot. I would never do such a thing, however appropriate it would be to do so.”

    btw — “getting in touch w your guilt feelings” — spending that $1000 on shrinks instead of “smart young counsel” are we? good that it’s working out for ya

  90. TKK says:

    Anyone should be able to say anything they wish about the Holocaust, Jews, the Caliphate, Muslims, the Polish, Bolivians, Africans, Americans et al- with no fear of criminal charges. If someone defames or slanders an individual- specific untruths that cause harm- take it up civilly.

    What’s horrifying is they fined and threatened his lawyer. That’s an obscenity that does erode the foundation of Western Jurisprudence. It’s unprecedented thuggery.

    Of the many examples of Jewish machinations and power presented here that are questionable- this is rock solid proof that France has lost its collective balls to the Shofar Gang.

    They are just as protective of their pet Muslims and strangely silent regarding the Islamification of France. I remember the Black Muslim rapper who beat boxed about killing white French kids- that was okay. He got off with a fine.

    It’s just white Christian men with a target on their backs.

    Au revoir France. C’était une bonne course.

    • Replies: @anon
  91. Rurik says:
    @Rurik

    • Troll: Mike P

    what’s the matter Mike?

    Are you unable to make the cognitive leap necessary to understand that the problems being discussed about France (and England and Germany and the ZUSA, etc..) today, are a direct consequence of what was done to Germany and Europe, during and after the war?

    Do you suppose that the enemy Germany was fighting (International Jewish supremacism//Bolshevism/banking) was something entirely different than the Jewish supremacists running France (into the ground) today?

    Or, is it possible that they are somehow connected?

    • Replies: @Mike P
  92. TKK says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    It would be more interesting to see her photo. (if the name is reflective)

    Any chick spending that much effort frothing with rage over WW2 doesn’t have much good going for her.

  93. Rurik says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    those whose credibility would be crushed by half an hour’s cross-examination by even moderately capable trial counsel

    that’s what’s so great about a forum like Unz, (as opposed to the controlled environment of a court room, for instance, where the arguments are subject to certain protocols ; ).

    Here you have to make the case before an unlimited audience, rather than a coterie of like-minded lawyers, pretending to be antagonistic (as they loot the public purse and their clients).

    Here, the merits of your arguments depend on the cogence of your words, not on your pompous displays of courtroom panache, (or lack there of ; )

    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
  94. Bukowski says:
    @Endgame Napoleon

    The anti revisionist law was brought into being in France back in 1990 after the incident at Carpentras where a Jewish grave was desecrated. Jews were clamouring for something to be done so the non Jews appeased them with a law against holocaust revisionism.
    https://codoh.com/library/document/688/

    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
  95. Iris says:
    @annamaria

    Soral is an honest and intelligent person. Finkielkraut is not: he is a zionist.

    Correct. Finkielkraut’s contribution to the French intellectual scene is naught.

    His schoolboy “philosophy” is based on two simple principles:
    – Accuse everybody of anti-Semitism
    – Censor anybody who does not agree with him.

    A video of the deranged Finkielkraut have a tantrum on TV and shouting like a lunatic:

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @WalkingAlong
  96. renfro says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    if you want to know why I class you with those whose credibility would be crushed by half an hour’s cross-examination by even moderately capable trial counsel

    I’ll take that challenge if Grace wont …..go ahead try to crush me right here by cross examination on anything to do with Israel or Zionist or Jews.

  97. renfro says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    p.s.

    But I warn you if you try to claim the bible as your deed to Palestine I will call the guys in the white coats with straight jackets to come haul you away. You should all be in mental institutions anyway….you’re a crazy cult.

    ”Israel’s UN Ambassador Danny Danon is now claiming the bible as proof to Israel’s fundamental right to all of Palestine. During his speech at a UN Security Council meeting on Monday, Danon held up a bible at for all the ambassadors present to see and said, “This is our deed to our land.” Jonathan Ofir says this is just an indication of Israel’s desperation for legitimacy.

    Such a religious, literally biblical claim, coming from a supposedly secular representative of a supposedly secular democratic state, put forth to a serious political world assembly, may seem bizarre, to say the least. But it is actually not new, nor isolated to the Israeli political right, which Danon belongs to (Likud). On January 8th, 1937, the New York Times reported how David Ben Gurion was claiming the bible as a kind of deed to the land, in his testimony to the British Royal Peel Commission:

    Deputy Foreign Minister Tzipi Hotovely has also used the bible as a direct claim for all of Palestine. Her motto: “This land is ours. All of it is ours. We did not come here to apologize for that”. A couple of years ago she waved an empty book at Palestinian lawmakers in the Knesset, saying that it’s their empty history, and that they are “thieves of history” (stealing it from the Jews, as it were). ”

    This historical resort to the bible is an indication of Israel’s desperation for legitimacy. When you don’t have any more claims that can have any meaning in modern international law, you resort to old books and old myths, in hope that someone will fall for it.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Tsigantes
  98. Iris says:
    @TKK

    Any chick spending that much effort frothing with rage over WW2 doesn’t have much good going for her

    In that you are very wrong: the most attractive men are the intelligent ones, including those crazy enough to discuss WW2 for days onwards. I’d say it is you who have not much going on in your life 🙂 🙂

    • Replies: @Grace Poole
  99. Mike P says:
    @Rurik

    I don’t mind your political and historical theorising, but I do mind your gloating at the misery of the French. I am not French, but I absolutely hate watching what is being done to them; I wouldn’t wish it on my enemies. All the French I have met were perfectly amiable, kind, thoughtful people, and they live today and are not to blame for what went wrong in history.

    So, I stand by my “Troll” – with respect to this one post of yours.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Rurik
  100. @Wizard of Oz

    You should ask other commentators where they got their information instead of dismissing them as crazy. You could then do some research and look it up yourself.

    In the case of France and the EU; the French government used to be able to borrow at 0% interest from its national bank in order to finance massive public works benefiting their citizens. On the 3rd of January 1973, under the presidency of Georges Pompidou (a previous director of the Rothschild bank) a law was passed called the Pompidou-Giscard law, known to “the Extreme-Right” as Pompidou-Giscard-Rothschild law. In “polite” company that last name is omitted. For the rest of the EU, on the quick, under article 104 of the Maastricht accords, and then called article 123 for the Treaty of Lisbon. France, along with other countries, held a referendum on the treaty of Lisbon, a majority voted against it but it was passed by their treasonous deputies in parliament. There is a lot more with regards to those EU accords and treaties and the historical context surrounding them but, on the whole, that’s what they were about.

    Some people choose to forget history is made by individuals and groups. It’s like they think ideologies create themselves; appearing out of the void and progressing on inexorably. People, by their words and actions, carry ideologies forward. People choose to promote, support and defend an ideology for all kinds of reasons and by doing so become the personification, the embodiment of that ideology. Their works further its progress. Not to mention the development of an ideology over time might yield consequences that where never intended in the first place. Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet (1627-1704) said: “God laughs at those who, while condemning the effects cherish the causes.”
    Banks are not some imperceptible, autonomous force either; they were founded at some point by people and it’s those people, its owners which profit. Rothschild (Word wants his name spelled correctly) isn’t some bogeyman! That dynasty worked extremely hard to get to the top among the other elites. You have to admire their tenacity, determination, intellect, cunning and the will it took to get to power. I don’t believe they plan, control and are behind everything that goes on in the world but, I think they and other elites try to take advantage of things as they come up; to steer events in their favor. They’re like a surfer; they try to keep control, to stay on top but they have no control over the waves.

    As I’ve said in a previous post, I like quotes. Better men have already said it and far more succinctly and eloquently that I ever could. Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs back in November 2009
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-goldmansachs-blankfein/goldman-sachs-boss-says-banks-do-gods-work-idUSTRE5A719520091108

  101. c matt says:
    @Felix Culpa

    All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it bites you in the ass.

  102. One Tribe says:
    @Genrick Yagoda

    There are several disconnections on facts/assumptions here; for example, I am not of First Peoples descent (that I know of), though of long, long landed colonial descent.

    Some of your remarks about pre-European colonialization seems … out-of-alignment with the facts, as I know them.

    I think it very unlikely that we are “in extreme opposite ends of this equation”, though perhaps we can agree to disagree, and perhaps start again at a later time.

    To be clear, I am against the wave of post-European colonization that is happening now, not on any racial grounds, for I do not believe that the concept of race can be proven by scientific measurement, but I am against the current subversion of our culture by colonialists who operate, according to them, “by way of deception”, and their necessarily associated dysfunctional anti-social values and behaviours, which I believe, threatens the biosphere.

    Peace.

  103. annamaria says:
    @Grace Poole

    Thank you for the clarity of your well-informed post.

    As for W of O, it is quite possible that he/she is an aged zionist, which means that there is no point in reasoning with this excessively self-confident and old commenter.

  104. annamaria says:
    @Iris

    Agree, Finkielkraut is degenerate.

  105. Rurik says:
    @Mike P

    but I do mind your gloating at the misery of the French.

    my girlfriend is French

    I’m not gloating at the misery of the French, so much as admonishing them for their self-serving myopia. I suspect they’d lose every last inch of France over to their enemies so long as they could continue to pretend that they were the good guys during that war. Just like the Russians and Poles and Brits and Americans.

    I have a Cuban buddy of mine who absolutely hates it that Americans have become so politically correct. He asks me ‘when is the white man ever going to straighten up, and tell them all to get their dicks out of his collective arse?’

    And sadly, I have to wonder if the answer is ‘ever’.

    People become addicted to their self-assuaging vanities and narratives. The Brits and Russians and French and Americans all love, love, love their masturbatory narrative that they ‘saved the world from the evil Nazis’, as they’re all being menaced by the very same Jewish supremacist$ that used them as cannon fodder to destroy Germany.

    If you’re being menaced by an enemy, or a disease, for instance, but your conceits prevent you from acknowledging it and naming it, lest it is psychically uncomfortable for you to do so, and you’d rather die than admit your mistake, then my point is to shake you to your core, in order to make you want to survive.

    As long as the French, (and English and Russians and Poles and Americans…) are all sooo enamored of their status as ‘heroes’ for what they did to Germany, that they allow themselves to be genocided off the planet to protect their precious narrative, so that they can all (finally) feel superior to Germans, then yes, I almost feel like they have it coming. (and I’m not German, btw).

    If you see a friend being crushed by a thug, and you can’t get to him to help him, and you see his will to fight slowly ebbing away, then I wonder if laughing at him and mocking him is the way to go, just to get him to fight back!

    As long as the French continue to scorn the Germans for their temerity vis-a-vis “the Jews” during WWII, then they’re never going to be able to toss the Jewish supremacist yoke off themselves.

    And I sort of suspect, that if it meant France must die a humiliating death, crushed under the mindless tyranny of Zion, by the same people who murdered off the Kulaks, because to resist would make them seem too much like those ‘evil Nazis’…

    Then I ask you.. do they deserve to keep their nation?

    This is the thing..

    We all have to realize that we’re all in this together. Russians, Brits, Norwegians, Venezuelans, French, Ukrainians, Americans, Palestinians and all the rest / vs. the Jewish supremacist Zionists that are controlling most of our governments in absolute terms.

    As long as the French are happy to see this on Drudge right now:

    Mohammed Number One Name for Baby Boys in Berlin…

    Because those Germans deserve it for thumbing their noses to The Jews, then yes, I sort of feel like they deserve to get the “Jew” treatment, but only until they FINALLY wake the fuck up! And pull that kosher *** out of their collective arse.

    And if their butt-hurt towards Germany is sooo strong, that they prefer to hand their nation away to Africans and Middle Easterners and everyone else, just out of spite against their blond brothers and sisters across the border, then perhaps they do have it coming.

    • Replies: @Mike P
  106. Bukowski says:

    Britain has already jailed people for distributing holocaust cartoons. Back in 2010 Simon Sheppard and Luke O’Farrell were imprisoned for handing out a comic book called Tales of the Holohoax.
    http://www.heretical.com/sgs-2013/jdiaryp1.html

    Here are the cartoons that the men were sent to jail for – http://jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/TalesOfTheHolohoax.pdf

  107. @WalkingAlong

    A few follow up questions for Mr. Blankfein could have been: What God are you talking about? Who worships this God? How do they worship it? What are the tenants of this religion? What are the details and objectives of this divinely inspired work? How long has this project been going on? Who else is involved in this holy work? What are virtues and sins proclaimed by this religion?

  108. Mike P says:
    @Rurik

    As long as the French are happy to see this on Drudge right now:

    Mohammed Number One Name for Baby Boys in Berlin…

    So what exactly do the French have to do with this?

    Also, I don’t really have to tell you, but – it is not really the Muslims that are Europe’s worst problem. Someone else is.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  109. @Iris

    Finkie has some wires that are crossed. He is smart enough to understand what is going on in France but cant get passed the tribal veil. Can’t allow himself to see the damage his cousins have done and are continuing to do. He admires some of the great works of french culture but as Lisa (comment 69) said he is also very angry at France. Even thought France was defeated by Germany and was under occupation. They had to follow orders. Even then, many French risked their lives by harboring, helping escape and warning Jewish families of imminent arrest.

    But as Norman Finkelstein has explained and as Alain Soral remarked many times, the exploitation of Jewish suffering is a very profitable racket.
    Documentary called Defamation is a must see!

    • Replies: @Iris
  110. Rurik says:
    @Mike P

    I am not French, but I absolutely hate watching what is being done to them; I wouldn’t wish it on my enemies.

    it seems I’m not done..

    I agree with you here.

    But how do you get them to save themselves, when they refuse to name their enemy?!

    Because doing so would make them seem too much like ‘Nazis’ ?

    If a man in England or France or Germany, says they don’t want mass-immigration, then all anyone needs to do is call them a Nazi, and they piss their pants, hand over their money and daughters, and ask please never to be called that again.

    are not to blame for what went wrong in history.

    it’s not about what went wrong in history, it’s about today! And the reason things are the way they are today, is because of history.

    We fought on the wrong side of that war. If it would have ended with a defeated and humiliated Germany, then perhaps that would be one thing. But it didn’t end there, did it?

    And it will not end ever until we are all reduced to Kulaks/Palestinians,

    Or..

    Europe and the West find the strength of character to fight this fiend. And the first thing necessary in the battle, is to name the Jewish supremacist Zionists, who Germany heroically tried to save Europe from.

    Now imagine a Frenchman (or Brit or Pole or Russian) with the stones to speak that plain (and by now obvious) truth.

  111. Iris says:
    @WalkingAlong

    He admires some of the great works of french culture but as Lisa (comment 69) said he is also very angry at France. Even thought France was defeated by Germany and was under occupation. They had to follow orders.

    The problem with the organised Talmudic sect is that a lot of their so called suffering is complete fabrication, so it is difficult to believe their version of “history”.

    In French North-African colonies, for instance (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia), where there was little to no control of the Vichy administration, Jewish communities were protected by BOTH the French colonial authorities and the indigenous Muslim population. Their specific “suffering” was zero, apart from the drastic food restrictions that affected everybody.

    A few concentration camps existed, which inmates were only “resistants” (the guerrilla fighters who opposed German occupation), i.e. white Christians deported from mainland France.

    Nevertheless, the Talmudist sect screams that they were badly abused and even demand compensation for the “suffering” they endured in North Africa.

  112. @Wizard of Oz

    Always the same tiresome response; ad hominem attack and sputtering outrage.

  113. Rurik says:
    @Mike P

    So what exactly do the French have to do with this?

    this article is about the French, and their descent into depraved slavery/genocide

    being orchestrated by Jewish supremacists and their armies of quislings (Macron, for instance)

    My point is trying to be a thunderclap in the face of the French ~ that what is being done to them is exactly what was (and is) being done to Germany. By the exact, same forces.

    And that’s what WWII was all about.

    Because, as they lament what is being done to the French, (taxed to fund their replacements), they also continue to heap scorn on Germany for her alleged “crimes”, during that evil war. The same Germany that wanted no part of a war with France, (or England), but who only wanted to march into Russia and rout out the fiend who had Russia ‘by the hair of the head’, and was menacing Germany. Duh.

    But because Zionists in control of the world’s governments, were able to use France and England and the ZUSA to help Russia to crush Germany (again), they created this false narrative of these ‘evil Nazis’ trying to take over the world and gas anyone who wasn’t Aryan. And now that narrative is like a drug to the egos of the French, (and Brits, and “Greatest generation” Americans, etc.. ad nauseam).

    It is this false narrative that the French are too enamored of to question, because doing so might cause them some qualms about the ‘moral superiority’ they’ve strutted around with for generations vis-a-vis Germany.

    That’s why some French no doubt gloat over the invasion of Berlin, as they no doubt miss the irony that the same invasion is happening to France.

    Someone else is.

    yes, orchestrated by ((Someone else)).

    But how many Frenchmen are willing (like Dieudonné, for instance) to say that out loud?

    • Replies: @WalkingAlong
  114. Mike P says:

    qualms about the ‘moral superiority’ they’ve strutted around with for generations vis-a-vis Germany

    JC, man. Were you born yesterday? Have you ever seen a loser who did not ‘strut around with moral superiority?’ We all do it. Give it a rest.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  115. Nonny says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Such flattery, CanSpeccy!

  116. @Iris

    I’d give you a hug, Iris, but you might catch my ugly.

    Settle for a 🙂

  117. @TKK

    Any chick spending that much effort frothing with rage over WW2 doesn’t have much good going for her.

    How many people get their WWII history from History channel?
    How much time do they spend watching History channel to so thoroughly cement the propaganda?
    More to the point, how much do they spend on cable fees to be propagandized?
    Library books are free.
    This chick (rooster?) hasn’t had cable in >10 years.
    Minimum $9500 in my pocket.
    Pays for a lot of spa time to conceal ugly.

  118. anon[274] • Disclaimer says:

    “Finkielkraut is one of our French neoconservatives. Formerly a Trotskyist, he is now a nationalist. He embodies what Soral calls National-Zionism, that new ideology massively promoted by Jewish “intellectuals” and media pundits who, after calling for the abolition of borders and drowning Europe in mass immigration, now tell the French people to turn to Israel as a model for dealing with Muslims.”

    This is the way they keep their businesses of making money large and small across ages by causing frictions among non Jews.

  119. @Wizard of Oz

    A cowardly and pathetic display from you. Run away….

  120. @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    Called by wikipedia “an antisemitic, pro-Christian activist”. Can there be any higher earthly honor?

    It would be hard to top it.

  121. @Rurik

    All true and well said. I’d like to see the trolls attempt to refute any point you made.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  122. @Vojkan

    How do you know that person hasn’t tried it? Real tea is simply tea that a person enjoys drinking and there are enough varieties to go around. A cuppa varies anyway, with the treatment of the leaves after picking, preparation and serving methods. It’s all fine if one enjoys it that way. Earl Grey is not my personal favourite and I have lots that has remained unused for long enough to justify throwing it out. I used it as a punchline. I tried using Lapsang Souchong but it was a little too obscure. As for drinking, I like a good blend and I currently mostly drink a delicious (when I make it) and inexpensive brand called Dilmah. Cheers

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  123. @Wizard of Oz

    Is it even possible for a human waste of space to waste his time? One for the philosophers to ponder.

    • LOL: Grace Poole
    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
  124. Anonymous[167] • Disclaimer says:
    @NoseytheDuke

    The words “cognitive dissonance” tossed in like a drunken bar boor’s farting out the far end bits of his overheard vocabulary are most diagnostic. Because you would – but I challenge you – be pushed to find evidence of “cognitive dissonance” in even the most longwinded WoZ comments. A sample definition:

    the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioural decisions and attitude change.

    Thoughts and tentative beliefs which he/she tries openly to reconcile is of course something different; and tends to be boring and exasperating to some of the shortwinded crew that you cluster with on these Unz threads.

    “Avoidance of cognitive dissonance” is the usual subject of discussions which include cognitive dissonance. If I were to speculate wildly I would suggest that your surprising introduction of sherry into your original unenlightening comment on this thread was a subtle way of distancing yourself from the knowledge of what is at the core of your alcoholism, long ago pointed out by your WoZ bête noir.

    • LOL: NoseytheDuke
    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
  125. @Grace Poole

    Good bye again! Just 5 seconds!

  126. @Rurik

    Well, that comment should have left you with some mental energy. What about coming up with some evidence and argument in favour of the loony tunes views of central banks you seem to want to join in propagating on Ron Unz’s often valuable threads.

    Don’t assume you are only barking in the zoo. One of my old school friends was appointed by government to the Board of the Reserve Bank of Oz. A university friend was one of the most senior members of the BoE governing board.

    Where do you think the Fed gets its dual mandate from? What do you know about the origins of the BoE’s and Oz Reserve Bank’s inflation targetting?

    • Replies: @Rurik
  127. @WalkingAlong

    I owe you, and accord you, some respect for that but…. really…. wasn’t your first paragraph just a hook to be able to hang the rest of your quite interesting stuff on?

    Please don’t tell me you think that the loonies who waste our time on UR with totally ignorant tosh about central banks deserve to be indulged. Here I repeat my reply to Rurik:

    “Well, that comment should have left you with some mental energy. What about coming up with some evidence and argument in favour of the loony tunes views of central banks you seem to want to join in propagating on Ron Unz’s often valuable threads.

    Don’t assume you are only barking in the zoo. One of my old school friends was appointed by government to the Board of the Reserve Bank of Oz. A university friend was one of the most senior members of the BoE governing board.

    Where do you think the Fed gets its dual mandate from? What do you know about the origins of the BoE’s and Oz Reserve Bank’s inflation targetting?”

  128. Zumbuddi says:
    @PeterMX

    Thanks for mentioning Sylvia Stolz,
    Courageous woman.

    Who in USA is her equal?

  129. @Rurik

    Hello Rurik, first off thanks for all the posts you’ve done in the past on various articles. If you have any books or previous posts where you touch on the following subjects I’d love to know about it. Please bear with me while I try to sort this out.
    With regards to individual and collective responsibility, the roles of elites, self-proclaimed or not (leaders/rulers, the top % making decisions affecting the remainder of the country and their countrymen).

    I vaguely remember some neocon when speaking about Iraq, said the people who passively submit to Saddam are just as guilty, just as responsible as he was. They are to be blamed and have no excuses for the all the misery they suffered since they did not rebel. Of course, that never applies to the Tribe and the actions of their organized minority. Double standards all the way! Alain Soral briefly touches on this in the 38 min video, saying he makes a distinction between a people and its leaders (21 minute mark). However, if we accept that neocon’s theory of guilt then the entire West, for its actions in the Middle East and elsewhere are as responsible as their leaders and are, to a lesser degree, culpable in the destruction and misery brought about by the Empire. But it’s ALWAYS been a silent majority lead by a small organized, active, determined minority. A previous poster on another thread had said it’s 98% that follow, 1% that rule and another 1% that are trying to get power.
    The internet allows us to share information and find different sources, it gives us the unique possibility to forge an informed opinion and have different facts. Never has such a situation existed! The majority of people followed their government’s announcements, the various news reports, never questioning any of it. They never even considered the possibility it was false. Some brave men tried to stir up the mass, Louis T. McFadden, Charles Lindbergh Sr., Ezra Pound, Eustace Mullins to name a few but, the forces of Money, of Mammon won out. And that just about money! So many people tried to raise awareness about various other facets of Life.

    People have received a conditioning since birth! The media, always serving Power, worked wonders. An example I gave in a previous post was, word for word, “when I was in my 10th grade civics course I mentioned France should be for the French in a derisive way, and a guy beside me laughed and said “alright Le Pen!” I laughed as well; agreeing and knowing without the slightest doubt how much of a horrible racist he was. Meanwhile, I had never read or heard a single thing Jean-Marie Le Pen had said that didn’t come from the news. Such certainties and convictions while being a grade-A ignoramus.”

    Do people, as they learn about the realities and complexities of this world and past events, as the veil is torn from their eyes, do they become responsible for the state of things if they do nothing? The majority of people are just going about trying to live a good life, to get a job, raise a family and have a little fun before the end. What actions would you say are enough? Someone else said: “only the power of blood can stop the power of money”. The past leaders and elites, who fell to the worshippers of Mammon, Jewish and Gentile, did they fail due to a lack of violence on their part? Did their lack of vigilance bring about their destruction?
    Thanks and sorry if this is a mess. I tried to put some order to it.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Tsigantes
    , @Rurik
  130. @renfro

    Well one of the first things Legal Aid counsel would do in order to give you a sense of realism about your litigious possibilities would be to ask you

    “is there anything you can point to which justifies your evident belief that WoZ *might* claim that the Bible provides some claim on Palestine?”

    No? Well why do you say such things. I’m afraid some of the judges in our busy courts get rather testy and are likely to suggest psychiatry has more to offer you than the law.

  131. @2stateshmustate

    Well last chance for you to waste my time further. Can you come up with any justification for the central bank nonsense implicit in that nationalisation remark?

  132. @Moi

    Most Jews aren’t this way, but a sufficient number are, such that it makes sense to distinguish Jews from non-Jews (in a collective sense). And the fact is, most Jews won’t criticize or ostracize the subversives in their midst, so indirectly make themselves part of the problem, unfortunately.

    • Agree: Vojkan, Iris
  133. @Grace Poole

    What makes the Anglo-American terror bombing of German civilian centers so shameful is that, unlike the Soviets, they had no plausible claims for vengeance. It is truly fitting that Britain has fallen into the status of Third World Orwellian toilet.

    • Agree: Robjil, Iris, Jacques Sheete
  134. @BengaliCanadianDude

    He said he was leaving, but came right back. Promises, promises.

  135. Is what you say about what make’s sense analagous to the notion of it making sense to treat large black men in an urban setting as dangerous and to be avoided when one knows very well that the large black men who are professors at your child’s university or your child’s boss at the bank or consultancy are appropriately treated as peers or family friends? The analogy is perhaps even more instructive because the proportions are reversed. In your words “Most Jews aren’t this way”.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  136. @BengaliCanadianDude

    I’m sorry that was all my rather summary expression of, not cowardice, but contempt, inspired in you. Perhaps after a bit longer on UR threads wondering whether you are using your time well you will have some sympathy.

  137. @TKK

    Perhaps you should post your own pic first and demonstrate to all what a chick-magnet you are, and anyway, Casanova himself was reported to have said, “The older I get the more I find myself attracted to a woman for her intelligence”.

  138. Miggle says:
    @YessirreeBob

    At the end you make a strange switch from Judaism to Zionism. The Zionists murdered Jesus?

    Incidentally, early in Acts, Peter addresses the Jews who murdered Jesus, accuses them of it, and they repent. Just the rabble, of course.

    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
  139. @2stateshmustate

    Always the same tiresome response; ad hominem attack and sputtering outrage.

    That, and unctuous pedantry. Full of himself and opinions and not one of them ever substantiated as far as I can tell.

  140. @Grace Poole

    Your comment #90 bleats that you cannot present evidence to support your position, nor can you refute the evidence and arguments I presented.
    And you do not have the intellectual integrity or moral courage to attempt a defense, or to concede the errancy of your claims.

    You nailed it, Grace! Hey, he obviously thinks he’s special and doesn’t need to do any of the above; instead, we’re just supposed to take it all on his “authority.”

    Pathetic.

  141. @TKK

    Any chick spending that much effort frothing with rage over WW2 doesn’t have much good going for her.

    You got that backwards, totally off by 180, but I wouldn’t you expect to ever have a clue as to why.

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  142. @Vojkan

    I think that a valid appraisal of why so many Jews do so many bad things so systematically would require a thorough scientific study.

    I vote for positive reinforcement; they reap what they consider, ( in their childish approach to the world), rewards for what they do but I’ve long ago given up trying to find an answer beyond that. For me, it really doesn’t matter any more. In fact, it’s no wonder their own G-wd keeps “smoting” them time after time. In fact, I wonder why their G-wd even created the vile perverts in the first place.

  143. @YessirreeBob

    The Jews … rebelled against God…

    While I’m no bible scholar, it seems to me that their “rebellion” is a rather constant theme of their “prophets” in general, yet they keep rebelling.

    What I find laughable is the fact that those who consider themselves blessed with “high IQs” needed to have 10 basic rules of behavior written in stone and presented to them and even with that, they still don’t know how to behave. Like children, they appear to be clueless as to what the fuss is all about.

    • LOL: turtle
  144. @Grace Poole

    Nice work there Grace! All of it, as usual.

    This is something I would never have thought of in several millennia,

    Not only did Germans not “turn their backs on Christianity,” the were busily engaged in attempting to redefine ways for Germans to express Christianity that excised the murderous gods of the Old Testament. A century + earlier, Thomas Jefferson did the same exercise.

    Would you kindly provide a reference so I could read more about TJ in that regard?

    • Replies: @Grace Poole
  145. @Grace Poole

    In “Capturing the German Eye,” author Cora Sol Goldstein wrote that the images recorded by (Jewish Hollywood studio) videographers and photographers who accompanied US forces as they entered the concentration camps in the Spring of 1945”

    That’s one thing; here’s another.:

    Hitchcock project F3080

    [The former POWs] agreed that the cattle cars were filled with captured German soldiers who were infected with typhus and dysentery. They were in fact unwitting extras in a movie being made by Alfred Hitchcock, the Hollywood horror-film specialist. He had been awarded a contract to make a movie about concentration camps for the Nuremberg tribunal. At night the dead prisoners would be unloaded at Buchenwald, Dachau and other concentration camps by those who were still alive. Hitchcock would then film them, depicting the heaps of corpses as victims of German atrocities. A large number of corpses were dumped at Buchenwald at night, and next day the citizens of Weimar were forced to walk past the heaps of rotting corpses and smell the sickening stench. Some of them actually believed the American propaganda, that the corpses had been concentration-camp inmates. It was all filmed as part of Hitchcock’s movie. Afterwards the corpses were shoved into mass graves in the vicinity. That too was part of the script. This is the explanation that the two former officers of the US Army gave me concerning the trainload of dying German prisoners that I witnessed on June 16, 1945.

    -Nemo Anonymous, –Auschwitz, Buchenwald and Alfred Hitchcock’s First Horror Movie, From the Memoirs of a German Soldier

    Alfred Hitchcock was persuaded by Sidney Bernstein to leave Hollywood to assist on project “F3080.” F3080 was the name given to a project to compile a documentary film on German atrocities. The project originated in February 1945 in the Psychological Warfare Division of SHAEF (Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force). Hitchcock was recorded expressing his primary concern that “we should try to prevent people thinking that any of this was faked.”

    By Studio publicity still. Connormah at en.wikipedia [Public domain], from Wikimedia Commons

    • Replies: @Wally
  146. @Grace Poole

    Thanks for mentioning Goldstein, who writes some interesting things…

    The American occupation of Germany (1945-1949) stands as a model exercise in democratization by force.

    During WW II, psychological warfare played an important role in America’s military strategy against the Third Reich. As soon as the U.S. Army entered Germany, American psychological warfare experts disseminated propaganda …[and]…the Army shut down German newspapers, journals, and radio stations in the American zone and sector, to ensure a monopoly over information and propaganda. As a result, the information Germans received in the U.S. areas came exclusively from American information fliers (Mitteilungblätter), Army newspapers, and radio Luxembourg.

    – Dr. Cora Sol Goldstein,
    A Strategic Failure, American Information Control Policy in Iraq

    The emphases are mine. I would add that not only were Germans subjected to a “monopoly over information and propaganda”, but so were Americans, and many still parrot the atrocious, mindless garbage to this day.

  147. Vojkan says:
    @NoseytheDuke

    I concede after I re-read my comment that it may appear somewhat smug. Such wasn’t my intention.

  148. @Wizard of Oz

    I think you’re replying to me, and yes, it’s just as analogous. Most blacks aren’t violent criminals, but enough are that, lacking prior information in certain settings, it’s wise to use caution. (Similarly, most blacks won’t call out their troublemakers.) Ultimately it’s a question of conditional information.

  149. Vojkan says:
    @Jacques Sheete

    Odd how people who resort to ad hominem don’t realise that it most often reveals their own true nature.

    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
  150. One Tribe says:
    @Grace Poole

    I extend my acknowledgement and appreciation to your courageousness (flying in the face of many strange and exceptional laws censoring such discussions, irrelative of their factual merit), in assembling facts and presenting them in a coherent narrative (much more coherent that the legally-dictated narrative, which is laughably ridiculous).

    I am informed in my opinions, to no small amount, by readings of Douglas Reed work, and most specifically, The Controversy of Zion, which I urge you to read, if you haven’t already done so.

    I suggest that the ‘when‘ referred to you in your opening paragraphs is better considered in a millennial time frame, and that the data points are very prominent; this data can be collected from the large body of written material surviving from in-affiliation authors of Rabbanical Talmudism.

    One can see a very, very robust trend of systematized negative sum gain gaming behaviours by a trans-territorial collective. It is much easier to destroy-and-take-profit-from than it is to build societies, since the earning of trust, on both sides of the equation is necessary. SO, we can easily identify a trend in the millennial time frame abundance of data points, the societies (i.e. the nation state structure common in our current era) infected by what is extremely analogous to a predatory parasitic infection, always die!

    Other observations:
    1. An almost obsessively used information manipulation tactic is for this collective to:
    a. either doing some horrific crime and then immediate expend a huge amount of effort accusing other groups/peoples (i.e. cohesive groups of alternative values structures, i.e. not being predatory negative sum gain gamers of societies) of committing such a crime,
    and/or
    b. expend a huge amount of effort accusing one or more out-group(s) of committing horrendous crime, (typically against them), then using the leverage and a centuries old set of tactics to manipulate naive societies into granting exceptional privilege and protection to them, which they then manipulate to… commit horrendous crimes.

    2. I should like to note that genocide‘ is ultimately cultural

    3. Genocide has been committed against the so-called German peoples, as it was identified as an objective, like most of them, destructive, by a centuries old collective of like-minded individuals accepting values of universal hatred, and the development and enablement of that particular objective is well-documented by the aforementioned collective’s writers.

    4. At a similar time in the mid-1800s, at the latest,
    a. the figure of 6 million murdered had already been arrived at and committed to as part of a large social perception engineering program, to further the overall mission of enslavement of humanity,
    b. the terms “anti-semite” and “jew” were developed specifically to intimidate out-group thinkers and leaders from disseminating relevant factual information about the collective’s behaviour and ongoing ‘crimes’ against society/humanity, i.e. holding them accountable,

    There is so much evidence which is widely available to anyone to access (albeit, certainly access to this information is monitored, and records will be kept if the data can be captured about who is accessing the information).

    For such as you, I infer you appreciate the facts, subsequent reading recommendations will inevitably go to the expert, Michael A. Hoffman; don’t be put off by his seeming acceptance of the legally-endorsed narrative of … the most made note of events surrounding the European mid-century war.

    Certainly any fact-recognizing intelligence who investigates even a little bit below the surface of the-legally-endorsed-narrative-of-the-most-made-note-of-events-surrounding-the-European mid-century war, comes away with a lot of questions about the logical inadequacies, and is bewildered to eventually find out that it is in most jurisdiction illegal to investigate!

    • Replies: @annamaria
  151. @Jack Highlands

    Why? Aren’t those last two words a bit inconsistent and the only words of the article not so nice? (besides, ‘Nazism’ is hardly a new ideology)
    National-Zionists=Trotskyite-Zionists=Neoconservative-Zionists. It’s that simple, it’s the same gang. (which Anglo-American/CIA scam did Adolf Hitman represent?)
    Big lies and false flags are their trademark and the big lies/terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 were hardly their biggest nor their first ones.

  152. @NoseytheDuke

    Is it even possible for a human waste of space to waste his time? One for the philosophers to ponder.

    I ain’t no feel-o-sifer, but I quit reading that one’s contentless comments because they were a huge waste of everyone else’s time. Sounds as if little has changed.

  153. @Anonymous

    The words “cognitive dissonance” tossed in like a drunken bar boor’s farting out the far end bits of his overheard vocabulary are most diagnostic.

    Well, that comment sounds as if it were authored by someone with first-hand experience…

  154. @Miggle

    The Zionists murdered Jesus?

    Yup. They just didn’t call themselves “Zionists” at that time.

  155. @Vojkan

    Odd how people who resort to ad hominem don’t realise that it most often reveals their own true nature.

    Yup. They project quite consistently too.

  156. annamaria says:
    @One Tribe

    “Genocide has been committed against the so-called German peoples”

    Genocide had been also committed against the Russian people, specifically against Russian nobility, clergy, academics, and prosperous peasantry. https://www.revisionisthistory.org/communist.html

    Wayne McGuire: “Lenin was a Jew by the standards of Israel’s Law of Return: he possessed a Jewish grandparent. … Lenin was a Jewish racist who deliberately gave Jews especially, the most ‘intellectually demanding tasks.’ He admitted that 50% of the communist terrorist vanguard in the south and west of Russia was comprised of Jews.”

    Lenin declared, “We are exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class.” His partner in crime, Apfelbaum (Zinoviev) stated: “The interests of the revolution require the physical annihilation of the bourgeoisie class.” Who were these bourgeoisie? Certainly not Jews. …

    The first law passed after the Communists seized power in Russia made anti-semitism a crime punishable by death.

    The top Communist Judaic official Zinoviev stated: “Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds. Let them be thousands; let them drown themselves in their own blood.

    Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), historian and critic of Communist totalitarianism:

    “You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse.

    The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.” It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.

    The worst genocide in history wasn’t the Holocaust … in fact, it was perpetrated by members of the very same group of people who claim they were the victims of one.

    • Replies: @One Tribe
  157. Tsigantes says:
    @renfro

    Good point Rurik.

    Little known by the way is how Palestine got its name. Circa 1200 BC when disaster struck the MENA world and civilisations like the Minoans and Myceneans disappeared seemingly overnight, overrun by marauding Sea Peoples, the Myceneans were driven themselves to take to the sea as sea peoples. The Mycenean sea group were called the Palestra.

    By 11ooBC they settled on the Mediterranean’s eastern littoral and the land they settled became known as Palestine. Obviously there were people there before that too. The settling appears to have been peaceful.

    Jewish claims to Palestine are hokum. Unless one chooses to believe that a tribal god’s word (according to a self-serving, tribally authored text) giving these desert nomads a right to Judea / Canaan constitutes reliable history and a valid claim. There never was an Israel either. Not according to the multitudinous historical records of this periods where the Hebrews do not appear except much later in brief mentions as a small aggressive tribe.

    We should note that when Rothschild started buying land in Palestine he had in the same period bought shares in the Suez canal under a pseudonym, and was engaged in Azerbaijan in driving the Armenians out of the oil business. Palestine along with Egypt bordered Suez and the Red Sea, that vital single link to the Indian Ocean.
    The rest is history.

    • Replies: @Tsigantes
    , @Tsigantes
  158. Wally says:
    @Jacques Sheete

    Excellent work that exposes the lies & stagecraft of The Allies in post-war Germany:

    Nazi Shrunken Heads, A 24-minute free video about lies which justify war : https://codoh.com/library/document/1528/?lang=en
    Buchenwald—A Dumb Dumb Portrayal Of Evil: https://codoh.com/library/document/1529/?lang=en

    A 2 hour and 22 minute movie, in 22 episodes:
    Episodes:

    Human Skin Lampshade,
    The Director, Shrunken Heads,
    Tattooed Skin Taken From Bodies,
    Ilse Koch Anachronistic Problem,
    Moral High Ground or Ethno-Genetic Strategy?,
    A Psyche Warfare Operation Makes History,
    Spotting The Chief of Psyche Warfare In The Propaganda Movie,
    Why America Believes In The Holocaust,
    Understanding The Piles Of Bodies,
    USA, Britain Caused Way More Starvation Deaths Than Nazis,
    Eisenhower’s Holocaust Hoax Strategy,
    For Eisenhower The Holocaust Myth Was An Incoming Popularity Coup – And The “Military Industrial Complex” Speech Was An Outgoing Popularity Coup,
    People’s Thinking Wants To Evolve Beyond Good Guys Fighting Bad Guys – But The Holocaust Myth Gets In The Way,
    Using Dead Bodies To Frame The Nazis And Justify World War II,
    Psyche Warfare’s Flawed Strategy: Using The Pfaffenberger Affidavit,
    Objects Planted By Psyche Warfare End Up As Nuremberg Trial Evidence,
    The Same Americans Who Helped Create The Holocaust Myth,
    Then Went On To Create The Cold War,
    Proof That Psyche Warfare Worked With The New York Times To Promote The Holocaust Myth, Buchenwald Executions,
    A Scriptwriter’s Great Idea: Baking Ovens To Cremation Ovens,
    Militarism Needs The Holocaust Myth

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
  159. Tsigantes says:
    @Tsigantes

    ps Judea existed long before the hebrew tribe entered it from the south, despite the seeming relation of its name to the modern, fairly recent appellation ‘jews’. As did Jerusalem which was neither founded nor built by the hebrews. They conquered it for a brief period of several decades, but even as a conquered city the hebrew population was never much more than 30%.

    Historically, the hebrews never had a country ‘Israel’ and really only managed to conquer and hold small areas and groups of villages for short periods of time, and changing over time.

    Modern textual scholarship has established that the Torah and the rest of what is called Old Testament was written very late – 250 BC – in Alexandria, written in Greek not hebrew, for inclusion in the Alexandria library. (The jews more or less admit this: their claim is that they sent 60 scholars to Alexandria who each worked in isolation for 60 years and – miraculously – each one produced the exact same text down to every single word.)

    Modern analysis, and historical record shows that the hebrews sent a group of (literate) scribes to Alexandria who spent 60? years reading the Greek texts and toward the end produced their own book. Their guiding text is clearly (due to references) Plato’s The Republic, a cynical book describing step by step how to create a republic, a ‘history’ and a mythology out of thin air, including just enough detail from tribal oral story telling to be recognisable….to convince a people or tribe within one generation that this is their history. Plato’s emphasis is on creating a body of laws (to control this tribe) – which any reader of the Torah will recognise at once as constituting the main part of the first 5 books.

    Textual analysis further shows that whole passages and phrases are lifted from various Greek texts, including Homer – and that Greek myths and stories are ‘borrowed’ and adapted too.

    The Greek version of the Torah was then translated to hebrew, with Greek vocabulary greatly enlarging the hebrew language and providing its grammatical structure.

  160. Tsigantes says:
    @Tsigantes

    Is it too much of a ‘reach’ to point out similarity between

    …a tribal god’s word (according to a self-serving, tribally authored text) giving these desert nomads a right to Judea / Canaan constitutes reliable history and a valid claim.

    and Ziocon USA’s claim today that Juan Guaido is president of Venezuala when the Venezualans voted in Maduro and Guaido never even ran as a candidate?

    i.e. Do verbal claims [Official Recognition] by a hostile enemy – based on a verifiably transparent lie – make something ‘true’?

    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
    , @anarchyst
  161. @Wally

    2 hour and 22 minute movie

    Glad you liked my post and thanks for the links, but generally, I do not do vids because they are too time consuming and too easily geared to propaganda purposes, which I resent highly. I find reading is a way better use of my time, and I can formulate opinions and ideas while reading and check them out as well in ways that never could be done while absorbing vids, which are, to a very great extent, the lazy way of approaching problems. I’ll grant you that clips of events can sometimes be of value, though the bias and degree of veracity of the reporting seems easier to detect in the written word than through vids, and reporter bias is extremely important in my always humble goy opinion.

    2 hour and 22 minute movie

    You have to be kidding. Me, sit there for that length of time drooling and farting, when there is so much to do out there? (For instance, right now, I must go check on my bees.) Absolutely no way.

    Anyway, I do not mean that as an insult, and I do appreciate the thought.

  162. @Rurik

    Here you have to make the case before an unlimited audience, rather than a coterie of like-minded lawyers, pretending to be antagonistic (as they loot the public purse and their clients).

    Here, the merits of your arguments depend on the cogence of your words, not on your pompous displays of courtroom panache, (or lack there of ; )

    You nailed it again.

    I get a big kick out of their whining when it finally dawns on them that no one with a brain gives a damn for their supposed credentials and displays of “authority.”

    They are as pathetic as they are risible. Here, the masks are off and it’s plain to see that the bigwigs and bigshots are not only mediocre nothings, but hideous sights as well. Thanks to everyone for their ability to call ’em out.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  163. @Tsigantes

    OMG!

    Your comment is very fascinating and sounds credible to me. Where can I find more info on all that?

    Their guiding text is clearly (due to references) Plato’s The Republic, a cynical book describing step by step how to create a republic, a ‘history’ and a mythology out of thin air, including just enough detail from tribal oral story telling to be recognisable….to convince a people or tribe within one generation that this is their history.

    I read, but did not study, that work many decades ago and I missed much more then than now, but it sounds as if Plato was a Machiavelli prototype to a degree. Would you care to comment on that idea?

    I recall that there was a lot about that work that discomfited me, and now I need to find the time to revisit it with your insights in mind.

    Thanks a ton. Amazing stuff there. Ευχαριστώ πολι.

    • Replies: @Tsigantes
  164. annamaria says:
    @Tsigantes

    Thank you for your scholarship.

  165. @Tsigantes

    Is it too much of a ‘reach’ to point out similarity between…

    No, and here’re are a few more similarities…

    World Zionist organization, or Jewish agency, or Alliance Israelite Universelle— whatever name it takes, it is at bottom always the Kahal with its eighteen centuries of accumulated experience. Its aims and principles, whether shrouded in the mysticism of the Talmud or bluntly stated in the Protocols, are the same to-day as under the Roman empire. But in recent years the technical improvements in its methods of operating31 and the debility of national governments32 have advanced its cause with singular rapidity. Just fifty years ago, a German wrote:33 ” Russia is the last defence against the Jews, and its surrender is only a matter of time. The elastic spirit of Jewish intrigue will crush Russia in a revolution, such as the world has never seen the like. When it has overthrown Russia, it will have nothing to fear from any quarter; when it has seized in Russia all the offices of state as it has done with us, then the Jews will openly undertake the destruction of western civilization, and this ” last hour ” of condemned Europe will strike within a hundred or a hundred and fifty years at the latest, since the march of events moves more rapidly in our era than in preceding centuries*.”

    -Leslie Fry, WATERS FLOWING EASTWARD, document unpaginated but quote at the end of Part 1, Ch VI,. TEN YEARS OF ZIONISM First published in 1931

    *I guess we can write ‘Ol Wilhelm Marr off as a “kunspiracy theorist…”

  166. anarchyst says:
    @Tsigantes

    My reply is “God is not a real estate agent”.

  167. refl says:
    @Rurik

    I think that’s what is dawning to most people on this site. As I represent the Evil People involved I have to say that I am not prepared to let my grandfathers off the hook. In the end, if you get beaten up you have to ask yourself if something was wrong with you in the first place.
    One thing is certainly that just as most people in Central and Eastern Europe they allways wanted ever so much to be like the West. The Kaiser dressed in British uniforms, Hitler dreamed that he would reign the continent in cooperation with British sea power.

    And indeed, the feeling what it is like to be dispensable nations is coming home to the Westerners.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  168. France is going to descend into a dystopian hell on earth. Your cities and towns will be overrun. Your children will become the playthings of sexual monsters. Your traditions and heritage will be mocked and demonized, as will your ancestors, as anti-Semites and “racists’.

    You’d think people would learn from what went on in the French Revolution 200 years+ ago.

    There is no depth of depraved hatred that will not be brought down upon the French people by their ((new masters)).

    One would think, but…

    One would also hope that the masses of smug, ignorant ‘Merkins would get a clue already and learn from the experience of many others and themselves, but I’m not holding my breath.

  169. Rurik says:
    @Jacques Sheete

    refute any point you made

    nothing so far, is seems Jacques..

    Just an unfortunate misconstruing of my point- that the hubris and malice that France (and England and Russia…) have all heaped upon a prostrate and ((occupied)) Germany, (all these generations) for trying to save them all from the fiend that menaces them today, is not to wish them (the French) harm, but rather to wake them up, so they’ll save themselves!

    But they’re so God damn enamored of their moral status as “superior” to the Germans for all time!

    That for the sake of their vanity and self-righteous sanctimony, they’ll submit to the ((NWO)), just so they never, ever! have to admit “the Germans were right” !

  170. Rurik says:
    @refl

    And indeed, the feeling what it is like to be dispensable nations is coming home to the Westerners.

    there is blame to go around, that is for sure.

    Looking at Ukraine today, abasing itself to the ((We$t)), one wonders at the seeming madness of this nation. Are they that cut off from all information in the world today?

    A very tragic people, who will find out just how dispensable those who make a deal with the devil, really are.

  171. Rurik says:
    @Jacques Sheete

    Thanks to everyone for their ability to call ’em out.

    few, if any.. better at that than you, Sir.

  172. Rurik says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    One of my old school friends was appointed by government to the Board of the Reserve Bank of Oz. A university friend was one of the most senior members of the BoE governing board.

    Oh shucks lizard, why didn’t you say that in the first place?!

    With those credentials, why anyone would be a fool to doubt or question your infallibility in all things!

    Where do you think the Fed gets its dual mandate from?

    Is this your best Sam Shama impersonation?

    The Fed is a privately owned institution, used to loot the American people of their wealth and fruits of their hard-earned labors, in order to enrich the most (((villainous scoundrels))) the world has ever known.

    Our constitution demands that our government mint our currency for a reason, because the founders fought a war to prevent debt slavery to (fiat currency banksters) for their progeny.

    As long as banksters are in control of our central banks, operating in secret and for profit, creating money out of thin air, and then loaning it out in back-room deals to their buddies, all while flouting the interests of the people they’re supposed to serving.

    What a joke. Just consider what the Fed is supposed to do, and if you check them out, they’re doing the opposite.

    They’re supposed to prevent depressions, but instead they cause them, in order to loot entire economies, and plunder nations.

    Just as the Fed deliberately caused the housing bubble in 2008, intentionally doing the opposite of their stated charter.

    Did your school buddies ever bother to explain that to you, lizard?

    • Agree: Cloak And Dagger
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  173. Rurik says:
    @WalkingAlong

    Hello WalkingAlong,

    Thank you for your thoughtful reply. I’ll try to respond in kind later when I get a chance..

  174. One Tribe says:
    @annamaria

    Annamaria, thank you for reading/commenting on my comment.

    Yes, Russia appears to have been permanently altered.

    Now we have similar programs against all out-group people, aka humanity, underway, by way of deception, (so situationally intelligentclever, clever – my aren’t we clever!).

    Creating inoculation to the war against humanity should be the primary focus.

    Just as it was stated in the movie, many minds are not ready to be freed from the informational tyranny, and must be guided into the shallows patiently.

    Also, emancipating the first victims (and in this case, they actually are victims), i.e. the average person who self-identifies with the collective, thus has accepted the duplicitous value-proposition, which inherently undermines their host nation state and humanity in general, can undermine the ‘activist fifth column‘, and thereby unravel the psychotic yarn.

    We must keep first and foremost in mind that this social disease is an ideology, no human is born with it, though they may be born into it.

    Currently it is comparatively easy for the adherents of Rabbanical Talmudism to go along with it, as they sense the risk of being exposed, and held accountable is so low, thus the inherent cognitive dissonance caused by, what is ultimately, a creed of universal hatred, is managed.
    Exposing the vast majority of these adherents-only-when-rarely-called-upon-for-apparently-innocuous-favours to increased cognitive dissonance pressures will likely result in an accelerating attrition rate, and hopefully one day soon, mass disavowals of the ideology and rejection of the self-identification.

    This is what we must work towards.

  175. anon[306] • Disclaimer says:
    @TKK

    WTF you are talking about ? Get your thought a little bit more clear .

  176. Tsigantes says:
    @Jacques Sheete

    Jacques, thank you and may I say I always read your comments with appreciation!

    Much of what I said is common knowledge and historiography in the SE Mediterranean. Meanwhile we could ask why the history of the ancient Mediterranean and Asia Minor is no longer taught in western Europe – nor Latin and Greek. Even the Byzantine Empire has been dropped from the curriculum – and that’s modern
    With eastern Europe we also have a rather different take on WW1.

    A hoary old question among historians concerning the hebrews’ claims to great antiquity [in the region] is why then did Herodotus – who spent decades travelling in Asia Minor and Palestine and recording the most minute details – never once mention them or come across them?

    In english Toynbee covers the relevant period 300BC – 300AD in numerous books.

    From the horse’s mouth Israeli scholar Shlomo Sand has written The Invention of the Jewish Peoples and The Invention of the Land of Israel.

    Concerning textual scholarship the best introduction – considering the multilingual skills demanded by his books – is a (long but definitely worth it) Sott radio interview with Russell Gmirkin ‘Plato and the Creation of the Jewish Bible’. The implications are staggering and I am amazed that it has not been taken up.

    • Replies: @Iris
    , @Jacques Sheete
  177. Iris says:
    @Tsigantes

    Thanks ever so much for sharing.

  178. Tsigantes says:
    @Tsigantes

    Thank you annamaria. I’m glad that Americans especially are becoming aware of the overwhelming punishment and calumny heaped on the Germans…..but for me the great wound in Europe was what was done to Russia. Thank you for bringing it up.

  179. @Bukowski

    The anti revisionist law was brought into being in France back in 1990 after the incident at Carpentras where a Jewish grave was desecrated.

    Gee, I wonder whodunnit!

    Cui bono?:

    Jews were clamouring for something to be done so the non Jews appeased them with a law against holocaust revisionism.

  180. @WalkingAlong

    You could then do some research and look it up yourself.

    Never happen. And besides, yer supposed to take him on his “authority.” Always.

  181. @Tsigantes

    Thank you , Sir!

    I have read Shlomo Sand’s fine book and found it both interesting and illuminating and recommend it highly.

    I keep adding books to read, and I’m not only adding your suggestion, but putting it at the top of the list.

    Bless you.

  182. anon[316] • Disclaimer says:
    @PeterMX

    Sylvia Stolz is a hero

    • Agree: anarchyst
  183. anon[316] • Disclaimer says:
    @Grace Poole

    On the other hand, there is documented proof that persons high in the Allied governments; namely, Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill themselves, ordered the development, planning and execution of deliberate campaigns of the “extermination” by firebombing of German civilians.

    shame

  184. @Rurik

    And have you forgotten, or did you even notice, that the whole subthread was about some commenter’s foolish and ignorant demand that central banks [plural] be nationalised? That you have chosen to treat it as an opportunity for a typical anti Fed deranged rant can’t help raise the question whether your mental instability makes it a question whether one should ever spend time on your posts in hope of a fact, idea or argument that adds something positive.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    , @Rurik
  185. @Wizard of Oz

    Kindly explain why Rurik’s comment shows how he is deranged in your opinion? What grounds do you have to question Rurik’s mental stability when your own is questioned much more frequently here than his? Could it be that there is a certain (((type))) who tends to accuse others of exactly that which is actually true about themselves?

    Of course the central banks should be nationalised and owned by the nation, with the management being of necessity independent of any political influence. Money is the “bloodstream” of any nation and is just as important as essential infrastructure is, if not more so. There are a great many industries that are best left in private hands but the issuance and distribution of currency isn’t one of them.

    “Essential infrastructure is vital to the wellbeing and security of the nation and is thus too important to be left to the whims of profit” Friedrich List

    “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws” Mayer Amschel Rothschild

    In a (true) democratic society ownership belongs to the people. That we have fraud and treachery in our supposed democracies is due to the fact that those that we entrust with the management of our nations are rarely, if ever, held to account for the crimes and misdeeds they commit while in office. The Chinese rightly shoot them.Be real, you surely know all of this and are really here just to lie, deny and defend the indefensible because that’s the sort of low value person that you are.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Rurik
  186. anonymous[708] • Disclaimer says:
    @NoseytheDuke

    What is it about the sometimes long winded but careful WoZ posts that brings out the worst in you, you pathetic creature. No one with half a brain could defend Rurik or the original bleat about nationalizing central banks as if the Fed’s dual mandate or the B of E’s inflation mandate weren’t proof enough that the private sector doesn’t own and control even those central banks. And then to make sure you align yourself with the crazies you bring out (((…))) and the favourite phony Rothschild made up quote. Don’t forget to do your fly up after pissing off the grog on the nearest lamp post.

  187. Tsigantes says:
    @WalkingAlong

    What a wonderful comment thank you!

    How convenient and atavistic for a neocon to extend blame from enemy leaders to entire ‘enemy’ populations, since this would seem to legitimise ‘collateral damage’ and attacks on non-military targets; it legitimises by implication bio weapons, torture and Guantanamo itself. Yet under long standing existing law ALL civilians are off limits and even enemy armies are relieved of such blame, which is why there used to be proper POW camps.

    Greeks, Spanish, Italians and others demonstrated hard and for years against TPTB – until this was savagely criminalised by their own governments [ahem, “EU” / PTB] – and in the case of Greece made moot, redundant, in 2015. Perhaps because these ‘battles’ were focused on and fought in front of their respective parliaments and manipulated into violence by Black Bloc? Too late we understood that the punishing conditions imposed from above on the PIIGS was never going to be changed by demonstrations and that this was not ‘national’. More to the point our minor country statuses and gutless compradore leaders had no say or control over decisions anyway.

    By 2019, never have the populations of the EU been more divorced from the “leadership” and (IMHO) better informed. Although hope turned to Italy last year with the Salvini government, only the French Gilets Jaunes have managed to make this reality crystal clear. An entire population (80+%) – all over France, not just in Paris – has become the leadership’s ‘enemy’ and ‘moving target’. More to the point, their resistance proves beyond doubt that today’s leaders are fraudulent *fake* place-men and thoroughly anti-national, absolutely opposed to the interests of their countries and peoples. Even more courageous the French are in direct confrontation with one head of the Hydra and not a mere captive and minor government….

    The trapped populations of the EU salute you, our hopes go with you!

  188. @anonymous

    What is it about the sometimes long winded but careful WoZ posts that brings out the worst in you, you pathetic creature.

    Golly gosh, that is a really good question. Thank you for asking. BTW, questions are customarily followed by question marks, i.e. these things ???

    I suppose it could be that no matter how many times various commenters have set WoZ straight on things, he just comes right back with his original BS. In short, he serves no useful purpose here. It could also be that he defends those creatures that are the enemies of the very worst elements of society such as the banksters behind the proven frauds that have caused a great many decent hard-working people to lose their homes and destroyed families and futures.

    The endless wars too, they don’t sit well with me and anyone attempting to justify them or even to obfuscate awareness of who is behind them is deserving of scorn as far as I’m concerned. These wars have caused a great many deaths both in our societies and in the nations destroyed by them, not to mention the waste of (((borrowed))) money used to wage them.

    The curtailing of rights, interference in politics etc, is there anything they don’t meddle in?

    That a pompous, long-winded author of rambling, barely coherent and frequently misspelled comments would have the chutzpah (I think that’s the right word) to call me an alcoholic, well, I think this brief account of why this worthless bloviator is the target of a few well-deserved insults from myself and other commenters needs no further explanation, even though, with a headache inducing review of his comment history, I’m sure I could add to this. You don’t have a comment history but I’m sure that if you did it would reveal a long list of comments from a like-minded waste of space.

    I hope I’ve been able to answer your question and thanks again for asking.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  189. @anonymous

    p.s. Did you know that the word grog originally referred to watered down rum?

  190. @NoseytheDuke

    Correction:

    It could also be that he defends those creatures that are the enemies of the very worst elements of society such as the banksters

    Should read.. It could also be that he defends those creatures that are the very worst elements of society such as the banksters

  191. Rurik says:
    @WalkingAlong

    Hello again WalkingAlong,

    If you have any books or previous posts

    There isn’t any one book or article I can point to, other than to say that my personal ‘red pill’, was the speech by Benjamin Freedman I read so long ago. Everything I’ve read since then only bolstered Freedman’s points.

    To your question about collective responsibility for what our governments do, I appreciate how nuanced and tangled this issue is, as you eloquently express.

    And you’re right, of course, about how you can’t blame people for believing the lies they’ve been told by virtually every single source of information, from their parents to their churches and schools and of course, the ((media)).

    In general, I suppose I do get frustrated with a kind of willful ignorance of so many people, and what I consider to be a moral cowardice, when it comes to being willing to question so many of the obvious lies and false narratives we’re all marinating in.

    When it became obvious that Saddam had no WMD, where was the outrage from the American people? The chimp even made jokes about it

    Why haven’t the British people demanded the arrest of Tony Blair for lying them into a war?

    So you’re right, with the media and all the institutions of power (universities, courts) at their finger tips, it seems they can get away with anything, (USS Liberty, bankster bailouts, 9/11, lying us into Eternal Wars for Israel, etc..). The people are too often as cow-like as The Protocols mocks them for being.

    But there is some shred of hope, I’d say, since in every case that I’m aware, the American people always vote for the peace candidate for president, and then in every case (Trump’s still pending), we get betrayed with war.

    But this is all in a very general sense, and what I was doing on this thread, was speaking of France in particular. Not that the French are uniquely guilty, but I figured I’d at least vent some spleen ‘in their general direction’. (with apologies to Monty Python ; ).

    I’ll explain..

    This is how it seems to me. The Russians are too often macho, ultra-nationalists, (like the Poles, for instance), in their hatred and resentment for Germans. They know the stories of gas chambers was all a blood libel, used to demonize the German people, but they like the lie, because it’s used to crush the spirit of the German people, and I suspect there’s something soothing to the Slavic temperament to see the Germans face shoved into the manure, generation after generation.

    Sure, there’s no love for the zhids in Russia, as they’re treated to ((Bolshevik and Soviet)) genocide and slavery for so long, only to turn ‘capitalist’ on a dime, and then have their nation looted by the same tribe who treated them to their ‘equality utopia’, for so terribly long.

    But they don’t seem to hate the ‘zhids’, with the same kind of visceral rancor they reserve for Germans. I suppose it’s sort of like how brothers sometimes hate their brothers the most, for being more successful than they are. That’s kind of how I see the hatred so many have for the Germans, because they’re a great people. If the Germans never amounted to anything, then I don’t think they’d be so resented (hated) like they are all over Europe. Especially by their neighbors.

    Which brings me to France.

    We all know that France under Vichy was not too terribly harsh. The Germans obviously didn’t hate or want to harm the French people, they simply didn’t want to fight them, and that’s why they had to occupy France, so they didn’t have to kill the French people, who were previously, (just like today) under the absolute domination of the tribe. Were it not for Vichy, the French government would have demanded that every single French Gentile give their life dying to kill Germans (a la Ilya Ehrenburg), who had raised their hand to the tribe.

    This stuff all goes back generations. And it’s just as true of England, as it is of France.

    People get a kind of dopamine rush by feeling superior to others. Especially when those ‘others’ are strong and intelligent with a proud past. What better way to put them in their place than to pile on, and sneer your sanctimonious reproach at those ‘guilty’ people.

    That’s sort of how I see the Brits and French attitude towards Germans. And (those by now mythical) ‘Nazis’.

    The reason the French (and Brits and others..) can’t solve what ails their nations, is because if they mention the cause, someone, somewhere will say they sound like a Nazi, and so it shuts them up, doesn’t it?

    No one wants to sound like a Nazi (or ‘racist’ or KKK redneck imbecile, etc..), and so as the Jewish supremacists are in the process of flooding France with Third World replacements of the French people, who’re being taxed like crazy to fund the replacement process, they still don’t dare speak out, for fear of being called a ‘Nazi’.

    “Only the Germans are Nazis!!’

    I even remember reading something somewhere by some Frenchman who was complaining about how minorities were destroying French society, and then someone said he sounded like an American racist. Whereupon the Frenchman declared with great indignation that the racism of Americans was of course very real and vile, but was due exclusively to the American history of slavery, and that it was wrong and outrageous to compare a Frenchman’s perspective on immigration to an Americans, because the French don’t have the same racist history of slavery and Jim Crow, as American’s do.

    Do you see what I’m getting at?

    I’m not a writer or academic, and only offer my perspective as a working class bloke, who tries to see things the way they are. Because too often, it seems to me that people’s ‘feel-good’ myopia are their undoing.

    I hate to see what’s happening to France (and England and Germany and N. America, etc..) today.

    But as long as the narrative of ‘evil Nazis’ are the only ones who would complain!’ pervades, and as long as the French (and Brits and Russians…) get all smug and giddy at being able to sneer at Germans for their ‘crimes’ and their ‘guilt’, then they’re not going to be able to deal with the elephant in the living room = Jewish supremacist power over their governments and media and institutions.

    The exact same Jewish supremacist power that drove the Nazis to the brink and over it, into the abyss.

    Yes, the Nazis were racialist and arrogant to a fault, but they were right about the existential threat of Jewish supremacist power, that had taken over the central banks of the West and were using that nefarious power to dominate Europe and Russia and N. America and beyond.

    Exactly like we see today.

    Wars and spiritual sewage and demographic shifts that are intended to cause as much hatred and strife in people’s lives as exists in the black heart of your typical Jewish supremacist.

    There is no way out of the troubles that plague France except straight though the Jewish supremacists, who own the current government and media of France in absolute terms.

    As long as the French can be cowed with jeers of ‘Nazi’, for anyone who defends Le Pen, for instance, then they’re doomed to the kind of horrors that were visited upon the people of Germany under the ((Weimar)) regime. Or the Hungarian people under Kun, and on and on.

    And seeing that Hungary today has freed itself from the devil’s grip, that gives me hope for France.

    But they have to leave their nationalist conceits behind, especially concerning the narrative of WWII, with the Germans as the bad guys.

    The bad guys were the genocidal Bolsheviks, who showed their hand (and true nature) by the way their treated the Kulaks, (and at Katyn, etc..).

    The Nazis were a survival response to that dire threat, and what they did was laudable, from a purely survival perspective.

    How do I know this?

    Because of everything I see happening today.

    The Jewish supremacist imperative to be absolutely on top, and to shit down upon everyone else, with a vicious hatred for their victims.

    Their demand that all great races commit suicide, as their pig-god demands.

    Their serial treachery and guile and hegemony. It pervades every shred of our national and societal life. Hatred on acid, is the order of the day.

    And as it’s clear today, so too everything I’ve read about real history, means that it was thus back in the 1930s as well.

    We the people of the West have to harden ourselves to a dire reality. If we don’t sever the ownership of our central banks from the tribe of hatred-consumed supremacists – that are using that power to destroy us, then it’s going to be one hell of a horror show as our nations are driven to the brink, and over it into the abyss, just like was done to Russia and Germany in the last century.

    I guess I just don’t want to see that boot, stamping on that human (French) face, for all eternity.

  192. Rurik says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    some commenter’s foolish and ignorant demand that central banks [plural] be nationalised?

    I guess six million wasn’t enough for that anti-Semite!

    Nationalizing the Fed = geysers Eli Wiesel’s blood shooting out of the ground!

  193. Rurik says:
    @anonymous

    No one with half a brain could defend Rurik or the original bleat about nationalizing central banks

    no one but a raging anti-Semite, that is!

    anyone who talks of nationalizing the Fed, is really talking about gas chambers and ovens!

    take the power to print unlimited Federal Reserve Notes from Jewish supremacists,

    and we’d have no more wars for Israel!!

    is that what these people want?! Peace! For God’s sake?!

    we’d have no more demands for open borders!

    we’d have Gentiles in the movie and media business!

    do people want more movies by that hateful Nazi Mel Gibson?

    Sieg Heil, you goose-stepping Himmlers. Never Again, means Never Again!

    The Fed must always stay ko$her!

  194. Rurik says:
    @NoseytheDuke

    Of course the central banks should be nationalised and owned by the nation, with the management being of necessity independent of any political influence. Money is the “bloodstream” of any nation and is just as important as essential infrastructure is, if not more so. There are a great many industries that are best left in private hands but the issuance and distribution of currency isn’t one of them.

    I was tempted to ask why six million wasn’t enough for you, Duke,

    but then perhaps my attempt at wry humor is getting old.

    So I’ll just say well said Sir, as usual.

    And also add for the record, that it is control of America’s central bank; the Fed, (and the fact that the US dollar is the world’s reserve currency), that gives Zionists / Jewish supremacists their near unlimited power over the government’s of the dying West.

    Take away that nefarious power, and peace and happiness would soon be restored to so much of the planet, now being menaced by the fiend.

  195. Wally says:

    Soral’s sentence has been overturned.
    Jews go nuts!

    https://www.algemeiner.com/2019/05/07/french-jews-furious-as-notorious-antisemite-dodges-jail-time-for-holocaust-denial/

    French Jews Furious as “Notorious Antisemite” Dodges Jail Time for Holocaust Denial

    French Jews reacted with fury on Tuesday after the Paris public prosecutor overturned a historic decision reached last month to sentence one of the country’s most notorious Holocaust deniers to a year in jail.

    Far-right activist Alain Soral — who has earned several previous convictions for hate speech and Holocaust denial without being incarcerated — had been sentenced to twelve months behind bars on Apr. 15, after he was found guilty of publishing an article that denied the Holocaust on his website, “Égalité et Réconciliation” (“Equality and Reconciliation”).

    But on Tuesday, the Paris public prosecutor’s office overruled that decision, arguing that the court sentence had wrongly applied the criminal code and was unlawful.

    Many of the individuals and groups that hailed Soral’s original sentencing as a sea-change in the approach of French courts to antisemitic agitation angrily denounced the decision to spare him from actual jail time.

    Only lies require censorship.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Parisian Guy
    , @annamaria
  196. @Jacques Sheete

    Thanks, frère Jacques.

    I’m sure you know what the comment alluded to — Thomas Jefferson composed his own bible, using only the New Testament, eliminating all miracles, etc.

    The Jefferson Bible
    https://www.beliefnet.com/resourcelib/docs/62/The_Jefferson_Bible_The_Life__Morals_of_Jesus_of_Nazareth_1.html

    F Forrester Church wrote the Preface to a Beacon Press publication of The Jefferson Bible. It opens with this paragraph:

    “In 1956, my father, Frank Church, [as in Church Committee, 1975] won election to the United States Senate. As had been the custom since 1904, on the day of his swearing in he was presented with a copy of Thomas Jefferson’s Bible, The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth. Two years later he gave the book to me.” (Forrester Church then recounts how that book was the first step to his study at Harvard Divinity school and to becoming a Unitarian minister.)

    That practice was “quietly discontinued” in 1957, but revived in 1997 by a “traditional values Christian” and (now) emeritus professor of economics, Judd W. Patton. https://www.beliefnet.com/news/2005/02/the-peoples-bible-goes-to-washington.aspx
    (Can’t figure out if the practice still continues; I suspect not.)

    In addition, Jefferson worked from time to time on something he called the Syllabus: a comparison of the Greek and Roman philosophers; the Hebrews, and the teachings of Jesus. His assessment of Jews was not favorable:

    “II. Jews.
    1. Their system was Deism; that is, the belief in one only God. But their ideas of him and of his attributes were degrading and injurious.
    2. Their Ethics were not only imperfect, but often irreconcilable with the sound dictates of reason and morality, as they respect intercourse with those around us; and repulsive and anti-social, as respecting other nations. They needed reformation, therefore, in an eminent degree.

    — but was corrected by Jesus:

    III. Jesus
    In this state of things among the Jews, Jesus appeared. . . .

    1. He corrected the Deism of the Jews, confirming them in their belief of one only God, and giving them juster notions of His attributes and government.
    2. His moral doctrines, relating to kindred and friends were more pure and perfect than those of the most correct of the philosophers, and greatly more so than those of the Jews; and they went far beyond both in inculcating universal philanthropy, not only to kindred and friends, to neighbors and countrymen, but to all mankind, gathering all into one family under the bonds of love, charity, peace, common wants and common aids. A development of this head will evince the peculiar superiority of the system of Jesus over all others.
    3. The precepts of philosophy, and of the Hebrew code, laid hold of actions only. He pushed his scrutinies into the heart of man; erected his tribunal in the region of his thoughts, and purified the waters at the fountain head.
    4.He taught, emphatically, the doctrines of a future state, which was either doubted or disbelieved by the Jews, and wielded it with efficacy as an important incentive, supplementary to the other motives to moral conduct.

    http://www.angelfire.com/co/JeffersonBible/jeffbsyl.html

    It’s been awhile since I focused on Jefferson’s studies into Jesus, but iirc, the study itself was actually very much in the mainstream: Napoleon’s conquest of Egypt and consequent archeological explorations in Egypt motivated many challenges to the ordained narrative of the Hebrew bible as the equivalent to civilization’s One Book of the History of the World.

    It was in this same timeframe that Ernest Joseph Renan wrote his Life of Jesus http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/16581/pg16581-images.html

    The search was on for a “human Jesus,” and Jefferson was part of it.

    Now that. you’ve got me started — Giuseppe Verdi and Richard Wagner were also part of this general cultural ferment. Both took part in the 1848 revolutions (about which I know nothing except that they occurred).

    I sure do hope “the B team” as Zarif called them (Bolton, Bibi, bin Salman) do not blow up the world before I’ve learned about the extraordinary contributions of that era, and what the world might have been like if We American’s [hadn’t] got punked in 1913. Woodrow Wilson’s girlfriend was the most expensive poon in the history of man.

  197. @Wally

    The sentence has not been overturned.

    The algemeiner did not understand.

    The sentence said that Soral must be sent without delay to jail, without waiting for an appeal trial.

    That “without delay” is unlawful. This fact has been recognized by the judiciary authority.
    That’s all. Nothing more and nothing less.

  198. annamaria says:
    @Wally

    “Only lies require censorship”.

    — Agree.
    The demise of French Republic: https://thesaker.is/gilet-jaune-sitrep-for-labor-day-and-acte-25/

    164,000 people took to the streets on Wednesday, May 1, including 28,000 in the capital…

    In Paris, even before the procession starts, the police officers started using tear gas to raise the tension. The police violence reached a new high.

    “The demonstration had not yet begun that the first traps were set up, the first sequences of gassings”.

    The police spend its time breaking the long procession, cornering small groups to gas and beat them. One of this sequence happened in front of hospital La Salpétrière’s entrance gate.

    Castaner, and the plutocratic media following him, publicly stated that “the hospital of La Pitié-salpêtrière was under attack by the “Gilets Jaunes” and saved by the intervention of the police”. In reality, CRSs encircled demonstrators, cornered them in the entrance of the hospital so that, under the effect of tear gas, they were just looking for shelter inside the hospital. Nurses confirm that not much has happened. Absolutely no attack. Even the newspaper Libération, then other mainstream media following, were forced to refute Castaner’s comments. Some people have however been arrested for “organized gang attacks”. Castaner is beginning to be seriously questioned, even in the mainstream press. The case turns into a public scandal. Macron did not react. …

  199. Anon[216] • Disclaimer says:
    @2stateshmustate

    Some don’t have wide repertories, arguably :).

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jean Marois Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?