The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
Poison for the Goyim: More Hysteria and Hyperbole About Labour Anti-Semitism
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Jonathan Sacks is given an award by the war-criminal Tony Blair
Jonathan Sacks is given an award by the war-criminal Tony Blair

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Jeremy Corbyn has a beard. So has Jonathan Sacks. But this shared philopogony hasn’t brought the two men closer together. Sacks is the former Chief Rabbi of Britain and, to be fair, I think we be better off if more Jews were like him. He doesn’t seem to hate Whites and the Christian religion in the way so many of his co-ethnics do.

Battle of the Beards

But that doesn’t mean Sacks is a reasonable or objective man where his own race is concerned. He can be ethnocentric and apply double standards with the best of them, as he’s just proved by his comments on his fellow beardie:

Jeremy Corbyn is “an anti-Semite” who has “given support to racists, terrorists and dealers of hate”, the former chief rabbi Jonathan Sacks has said. In an exclusive interview with the New Statesman, the peer described Corbyn’s recently reported 2013 remarks on “Zionists” as “the most offensive statement made by a senior British politician since Enoch Powell’s 1968 ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech”.

Sacks, who was chief rabbi from 1991 until 2013, added: “It was divisive, hateful and like Powell’s speech it undermines the existence of an entire group of British citizens by depicting them as essentially alien.”

At a speech made at the Palestinian Return Centre in London in 2013, Corbyn said of a group of British “Zionists”: “They clearly have two problems. One is they don’t want to study history and, secondly, having lived in this country for a very long time, probably all their lives, they don’t understand English irony either.” (Corbyn’s “Zionist” remarks were “most offensive” since Enoch Powell, says ex-chief rabbi, The New Statesman, 28th August 2018)

Enoch Powell predicted that mass immigration would lead to race war. Jeremy Corbyn said that some Zionists don’t get “English irony.” Whether or not you agree with Powell, is it reasonable to compare the words of the two men? Are they “hateful” and “divisive” in a similar way? I’d say no, they’re obviously not, and the vast majority of British Whites probably agree with me.

Sacks doesn’t agree with me, and he has the Community with him, according to the Jewish Chronicle: “Reform Rabbi Jonathan Romain of Maidenhead Synagogue said that, while the Enoch Powell analogy may have shocked people, ‘it accurately reflected what most British Jews feel.’”

The poisoning of Britain’s politics

Well, if Rabbi Sacks and other Jews want anti-Semitism, I think they should look much closer to home. This is from the Jerusalem Post in 2007:

Sacks: Multiculturalism threatens democracy

Multiculturalism promotes segregation, stifles free speech and threatens liberal democracy, Britain’s top Jewish official warned in extracts from [a recently published] book … Jonathan Sacks, Britain’s chief rabbi, defined multiculturalism as an attempt to affirm Britain’s diverse communities and make ethnic and religious minorities more appreciated and respected. But in his book, The Home We Build Together: Recreating Society, he said the movement had run its course. “Multiculturalism has led not to integration but to segregation,” Sacks wrote in his book, an extract of which was published in the Timesof London.

“Liberal democracy is in danger,” Sacks said, adding later: “The politics of freedom risks descending into the politics of fear.” Sacks said Britain’s politics had been poisoned by the rise of identity politics, as minorities and aggrieved groups jockeyed first for rights, then for special treatment. The process, he said, began with Jews, before being taken up by blacks, women and gays. He said the effect had been “inexorably divisive.” “A culture of victimhood sets group against group, each claiming that its pain, injury, oppression, humiliation is greater than that of others,” he said. In an interview with the Times, Sacks said he wanted his book to be “politically incorrect in the highest order.” (Sacks: Multiculturalism threatens democracy, The Jerusalem Post, 20th October 2007; emphasis added)

So Sacks claimed that “Britain’s politics had been poisoned” by a self-serving, self-pitying, self-aggrandizing ideology that “began with Jews” and had been “inexorably divisive.” His claim is absolutely classic anti-Semitism, peddling a stereotype of Jews as subversive, manipulative and divisive outsiders whose selfish agitation has done huge harm to a gentile society.

Sacks was right, of course: Jews do demand special treatment and did indeed invent the “identity politics” that has poisoned British politics (and American, Australian, French and Swedish politics too).

By saying all that, Sacks was being far more “anti-Semitic” than Jeremy Corbyn was, even by the harshest interpretation of those comments on Zionists. Furthermore, Sacks has proved that Corbyn was right. Zionists do lack irony. In 2007 Sacks, a staunch Zionist, claimed that the “poisoning” of British politics “began with Jews.” In 2018 he’s condemning Jeremy Corbyn for saying something much milder about Zionists.

“Absolutely nothing apartheid about this”

And in 2018 Sacks is also offering a ridiculous defence of a new law in his beloved land of Israel:

Asked by the New Statesman to comment on Israel’s new nationality law, which states that the Jewish people have “an exclusive right to national self-determination” in the country and stripped the Arab language of its official status, Sacks said: “I’m not an expert on this. My brother is, I’m not, he’s a lawyer in Jerusalem, he tells me that there’s absolutely nothing apartheid about this, it’s just correcting a lacuna. … As far as I understand, it’s a technical process that has none of the implications that have been levelled at it.” (Corbyn’s “Zionist” remarks were “most offensive” since Enoch Powell, says ex-chief rabbi)

When Sacks said there was “absolutely nothing apartheid about this,” he was protesting too much. He is clearly uncomfortable about the new law and struggling to defend it, which is why his usual fluency deserted him when he spoke to the New Statesman. One “levels” accusations, not implications. And the implications of the new law are perfectly clear, which is why Sacks was driven to waffle about “a technical process.” Yes, the law is a technical process whereby Arabs are defined as second-class citizens and Jewish supremacism is openly proclaimed as the guiding principle of the Israeli state.

Of Monkeys and Men

I’m sure that one of Sacks’ heroes, the great Jewish philosopher and Talmudic scholar Maimonides (c. 1135-1208), would have applauded the new law. This is what Maimonides wrote in his hugely influential Guide for the Perplexed (c. 1190), one of the most revered and respected texts in the three thousand years of Judaism:

The people who are abroad are all those that have no religion, neither one based on speculation nor one received by tradition. Such are the extreme Turks that wander about in the north, the Kushites [Blacks] who live in the south, and those in our country who are like these. I consider these as irrational beings, and not as human beings; they are below mankind, but above monkeys, since they have the form and shape of man, and a mental faculty above that of the monkey. (Guide for the Perplexed, Book 3, chapter 51)

Now that is racism, ladies and gentlemen. And if you want proof that Maimonides’ poisonous ideas are alive and well in the Jewish world today, look no further than Yitzchak Yosef, the Sephardic Chief Rabbi in Israel, who was condemned this very year for “calling black people ‘monkeys’.” Rabbi Yosef has visited the headlines before: in 2016 he “stated that non-Jews should not be allowed to live in Israel, except to serve the Jewish population.” The Jewish Chronicle added that he “later reversed this position.”

“Very, very good relations with the Jewish community”

Well, he might have said he no longer believed it, but that wouldn’t be speaking the truth. Servitude for goyim, the superiority of Jews and the subhumanity of Blacks are all perfectly orthodox Jewish doctrines. Jews are not the philanthropic egalitarians that they pretend to be, and Jonathan Sacks was perfectly correct to describe them as poisoners of British politics. He himself has upended another vat of poison by joining in the hysteria and hyperbole about Jeremy Corbyn’s mild comments on Zionists.

Let’s compare Corbyn with the shabbos goy Tony Blair, who gave Sacks a “Lifetime Achievement Award” in February this year and hailed Sacks as “one of my heroes.” According to the Jewish Chronicle, Blair “was conscious of the need to have very, very good relations” with “the Jewish community.”

In other words, the tiny Jewish minority pulled Blair’s strings. At the behest of his Jewish “fundraiser” Lord Levy, Blair lied Britain into a hugely expensive war on Iraq that killed vast numbers of innocent civilians, fomented sectarian strife in the Middle East and terrorism in Europe, and led directly to the rise of Islamic State. Jeremy Corbyn resolutely opposed the war and predicted its dire consequences. Blair is a liar, confidence-trickster and war-criminal who will one day, I hope, face the death-penalty for what he and his Jewish immigration minister Barbara Roche did to Britain. Jeremy Corbyn, by contrast, is a virtue-signalling Marxist idiot who opposes war and the military-industrial complex.

But Blair obeyed Jewish orders and Corbyn doesn’t. That’s why Blair is now worth more than £60 million and Corbyn is endlessly vilified in the British media. Few British Whites know the term “ethnocentrism,” but more and more of them can see the Jews practising it.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 39 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. I can see a backlash developing from these phony accusations of anti-semitism, particularly since the pro-Israeli types are also pro-war. They become scapegoats if the war they desire occurs and causes serious damage, a major likelihood in the nuclear age.

  2. Franz says:

    Asked by the New Statesman to comment on Israel’s new nationality law, which states that the Jewish people have “an exclusive right to national self-determination” in the country and stripped the Arab language of its official status, Sacks said: “I’m not an expert on this. My brother is, I’m not, he’s a lawyer in Jerusalem, he tells me that there’s absolutely nothing apartheid about this, it’s just correcting a lacuna. … As far as I understand, it’s a technical process that has none of the implications that have been levelled at it.”

    Well that’s the whole ballgame, Rabbi Sacks!

    All the political hair-splitting in the world don’t mean beans it it’s a technical issue, which indeed it is. Different groups of people need their own space. All the hemming and hawing about “multiculturalism” just means gutter lice such as Sacks won’t let Europeans solve their technical processes the way Israel can, and that’s the point that’s rubbing non-Israelis, especially the European variety, the wrong way.

    Henceforth all European (and European-derived) nations need a Minister of Technical Processes to get the migrants back to where they all came from, to keep Europe not only looking European, but even reversing the malignant in-migration forced on them for the last two decades or so.

    Just being technical about it, as the Good Rabbi says, right?

  3. Talmudmen says:

    Jew state technical process means shyster contortions of logic to worm out of binding commitments and obligations of the civilized world.

    https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR/C/ISR/CO/4&Lang=En

    “The State Party should interpret the Covenant in good faith, in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to its terms in their context, including subsequent practice, and in light of the object and purpose of the Covenant.”

    [Same as when the locksmith shows up and demands an extra hundred dollars. This is a culture of weasels.]

    “The Jewish and non-Jewish population are treated differently in several regards and that the State party’s domestic legal framework maintains a three-tiered system of laws affording different civil status, rights and legal protection for Jewish Israeli citizens, Palestinian citizens of Israel and Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem (arts. 2 and 26).

    “The Committee reiterates its previous recommendation (CCPR/C/ISR/CO/3, para. 6) that the State party amend its Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty 5752-1992 to explicitly incorporate the principle of equality and non-discrimination. It should ensure equal treatment for all persons within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction , regardless of their national or ethnic origin , and in particular , pursue the review of all laws discriminating against Palestinian citizens of Israel and ensure that any future legislation is fully compatible with the principle of equality and non-discrimination.”

    [These are totally standard white supremacists. This is white supremacism for ugly swarthy white guys with no pupils and low sperm count.]

    But read the whole thing. Israel is a primitive culture imposed by a genocidal state, enemies of humanity. Just because some pedo rabbi genitally mutilated me when I was a baby, that doesn’t mean I’m one of these assholes.

  4. Svigor says:

    His claim is absolutely classic anti-Semitism, peddling a stereotype of Jews as subversive, manipulative and divisive outsiders whose selfish agitation has done huge harm to a gentile society.

    Yeah but where’s the lie tho?

    The people who are abroad are all those that have no religion, neither one based on speculation nor one received by tradition. Such are the extreme Turks that wander about in the north, the Kushites [Blacks] who live in the south, and those in our country who are like these. I consider these as irrational beings, and not as human beings; they are below mankind, but above monkeys, since they have the form and shape of man, and a mental faculty above that of the monkey. (Guide for the Perplexed, Book 3, chapter 51)

    Lol based Jew.

    • Replies: @Anon
  5. great article, i “ranted” a longer comment but managed to delete half of it and im to damn lazy to rewrite it.
    Corbyn have made me curious tho, the attacks on him are damn vicious and ugly, they really fear him it seems. You brits should probably vote for him think.

  6. Altai says:

    You know, it would help if some of you people admitted that Corbyn just has different political views and priorities in life rather than call him an ‘idiot’. He is also the only party leader in many years to have called mass migration a serious strain on wages and housing and was low energy on campaigning for ‘Remain’ because of this. (Asylum seekers may consume welfare, but they are often not terribly competitive in the job market, it’s the EU migrants who displace people from jobs and housing. Asylum seekers put a strain on the middle and upper class through taxes, EU migrants hammer the working class.)

    The neoliberial matrix of which mass migration of both third world and cheap East and Southern European origin is an inherent part emerged from the right. When the Berlin wall fell the Overton window shifted and they became integrated into the left.

    He’s the only man of any power with any principals left in British politics and you’re content to stick the knife in so long as it’s from another direction.

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    , @Sean
    , @Moi
  7. Lukacs G says:

    The zionists don’t seem to realize that the more tediously they drone on about ‘anti-semitism’ the more likely they are to actually create it.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anonymous
  8. Anon[211] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lukacs G

    I like the vast majority of Jewish people that I’ve met, but what I’ve noticed is a tendency toward self righteousness and a lack of ability to attenuate, as well as properly apportion, anger from perceived wrongs over time. In other words, grudges are somewhat permanent and can be rather unbalanced in tone.

    This may lead to aggressive behavior, which they see as justified response / defense, that they inevitably fail to monitor the broader social tolerance of.

    Eventually, society is shouting “enough” at them as they continue obliviously down the same path.

    I believe that this might explain a lot of Western history.

    • Replies: @Wally
  9. renfro says:

    Sacks like many Jews is a Anti-Gentiles.
    Play offense not defense.
    Just get use to calling Jews anti- gentiles and anti- Christians.

  10. Anonymous[336] • Disclaimer says:

    Superiority of Jews:

    • John 4:22 “We worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.”
    • Acts 3:25 “He said to Abraham, ‘Through your offspring all peoples on earth will be blessed.’”
    • Romans 1:16 “The Jew first.”
    • Romans 9:4 “The people of Israel, chosen.”

    Servitude for goyim:

    • Romans 15:27 “For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.”

    All perfectly orthodox Jewish doctrines.

    And that, in a nutshell, is the problem with the Jew Testament.

    • Replies: @Moi
    , @Anon
  11. Wally says:

    All enabled by the fake & impossible ’6M Jews’ nonsense.
    see:
    American Pravda: Holocaust Denial http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

    Jews have been pushing their ’6,000,000′ lie since at least 1823: https://imgur.com/a/0LFFF
    and: http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php

  12. Wally says:
    @Anon

    Jews:
    the bride at every wedding, the corpse at every funeral

    said:
    “I believe that this might explain a lot of Western history.”

    Western history that is not as Jews tell it.

  13. @Altai

    “He’s the only man of any power with any principals left in British politics and you’re content to stick the knife in so long as it’s from another direction.”

    Corbyn is also, perhaps, one of the last friends and advocates for common workers to be found in the Labour party.

  14. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    One good thing, NYC Mayor De Blasio funded and elected by rich Jewish liberals is bussing little black orcs into the public schools in the rich liberal Jewish neighborhoods.

    Wealthy city liberal and conservative Christians don’t send their kids to public schools. Only wealthy city Jews send their kids to public schools for 2 reasons

    1 so the Jews won’t have to compete with high IQ goyim. In a city public school Jews will shine

    2 to save money for the $200,000 to one million dollar incredibly vulgar bar bat mitzvahs that are an absolute requirement to bring a Jew.

    Anyway, I hope that the children of the wealthy Jewish civil rights attorneys get treated by the black savages the way the savages treat all Whites.

    It’s hard for people who’ve never been in one to realize what just 20 percent blacks can do to a school.

  15. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Svigor

    Jews, or the Jewish leadership is always subversive divisive agitators who do enormous harm to most societies.

    The other Jews follow the Jewish leadership.

  16. I really wonder: if Corbyn stood absolutely no chance of being elected Britain’s next PM, would the antisemitic card ever have been played so enthusiastically? This appears to be an instance of blatant interference of goyim elections on behalf of a foreign Zionist state. Indications are the more the card is waved, the more the goyim voters will rally behind Corbyn.

  17. Corbyn reminds me of Samuel, first British High Commisioner of the Mandate Palestine.
    Samuel, according to the zionists, was ‘too objective’, the same as Hammarskjöld, who died in a plane crash.
    Samuel, according to his memoirs, indeed was objective, one of the passages in these memoirs is something like ‘it would be a great pity of jews, from their centuries of oppression in ghetto’s, had learned nothing but how to oppress others’.
    The Rt. Hon. Viscount Samuel. P.C., G.C.B., G.B.E., Hon. D.C.L. (Oxford). Hon. Fellow of Balliol College, Oxford, ‘Memoirs’, London, 1945

    • Replies: @Sean
    , @anon
    , @Anon
  18. Arioch says:

    > there’s absolutely nothing apartheid about this, it’s just correcting a lacuna. … As far as I understand, it’s a technical process

    That makes it just worse.

    He said, that the law did not changed status quo, but just detailed it, made it more structured and “ruled”.

    This however is on structure vs chaos gauge, not on apartheid vs cohabitude

    IOW, he did not refute the very claim that Israeli situation is apartheid, he just said that the law did not change the situation.

    What he de facto said that whether one considers the Israel post-law environment as apartheid then it necessarily follows that it was apartheid years before the law too.

  19. Sean says:
    @Altai

    Britain would suffer if Corbyn became PM because his Israel policy would make him such a target that he would introduce unlimited non European immigration (which his inclination is probably to do anyway). Corbyn should worry less less about the Palestinians and more about those who elect him.

  20. Sean says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Corbyn reminds me of Samuel, first British High Commisioner of the Mandate Palestine. Samuel, according to the zionists, was ‘too objective’,

    Why would he not be objective about other peoples’ countries

    Perhaps Jeremy ‘No Upper Limit to Immigration’ Corbyn is too objective for a British MP elected in the delegatory role of seeing to the interests of British people in Britain.

  21. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lukacs G

    As the late Joe Sobran once said, “Anti-semite used to mean someone who didn’t like Jews. Now anti-Semite means someone Jews don’t like.”

  22. This excellent article damasks this so-called Rabbi who is not a Rabbi of Judaism but of the racist Zionist ideology that reigns in the Apartheid State of Israel. “The tiny Jewish minority” pulled not only Blair’s strings but also that of the May regime. But what they need is to topple Corbyn to gain control of the Labor Party again to install a kind of Blair, Miliband and their ilk to do the Zionist bidding. “But Blair obeyed Jewish orders, and Corbyn doesn’t. That’s why Blair is now worth more than £60 million, and Corbyn is endlessly vilified in the British media.

    The author is right in stating that Sacks hero would be Maimonides who would not only applaud the new State Law of the Zionist regime, but one should not forget that Maimonides legitimized the racist and anti-human behavior so-called observant Jews nowadays refer to. Just read Israel Shahak’s “Jewish History, Jewish Religion. The Weight of Three Thousand Years”, which was first published in 1994 by Pluto Press.

    At that time, I reviewed it in German, and I was shocked. The Foreword, written by Gore Vidal, is an eyeopener. I can highly recommend the book to understand the racism within Judaism.

  23. Amen says:

    Zionist rag Breitbart just reported that 40% of Jews in the UK would leave if Corbyn becomes PM.

    Why is it always such a conundrum on both sides of the Atlantic? Either you get rid of the Jews, end all foreign wars and have unlimited immigration, or you sleep with the Jews, have endless wars and have slightly less immigration.

    And if you think that’s bad, no matter who you vote for, you end up with unlimited wars and unlimited immigration, because Deep State the un-elected cabal is running the world, and they hold the megaphone, i.e. msm.

    • Replies: @Arioch
  24. The British monkeys should have stayed close to the home (Europe) instead of gallivanting around the world on the Hebrew dime to travel on and intelligence regarding the wealth of the East and, India in particular. Now that the chickens are coming home to roost, the SLIMEYS (slick + Limeys) are crying bloody murder… it’s too late for the self introspection. As to the donkey, Tony Blair, by enriching himself to the tune of sixty million quids, the Gentiles are poor by, at least, sixty billion pounds and not to mention few million lives lost. Enjoy the pyrrhic victory boys!

  25. Arioch says:
    @Amen

    > Zionist rag Breitbart just reported that 40% of Jews in the UK would leave if Corbyn becomes PM.

    Corbin should make it into his commercial

  26. Moi says:
    @Altai

    Corbyn does not have the balls of a Tony Benn or Ken Livingstone, so hard to work up any sympathy for his Anti-Semitism predicament.

  27. Moi says:
    @Anonymous

    So who is at the top of the totem pole–the Chosen or the Exceptional? Or is there a difference?

  28. renfro says:

    Let us cut thru the bullshit.
    What do the publics want most?….to end rampant immigration?
    If so then marginalizing the Jews in Europe and the US politically is the first step.
    If you don’t do that first then you are just pissing at the Jew guarded establishment only to have your piss splatter back on you.

    You take the main tumor out first then you excise the smaller tumors……elect leaders who are against the Jewish Fifth Column and after that ‘influence ‘ immigration segment is removed it will be easier to clamp down on immigration because the majority is against illegal immigration and their protest will carry more political influence.

  29. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:

    At a speech made at the Palestinian Return Centre in London in 2013, Corbyn said of a group of British “Zionists”: “They clearly have two problems. One is they don’t want to study history and, secondly, having lived in this country for a very long time, probably all their lives, they don’t understand English irony either.” (Corbyn’s “Zionist” remarks were “most offensive” since Enoch Powell, says ex-chief rabbi, The New Statesman, 28th August 2018)

    Much worse things have been said about Muslims following terror attacks and ‘not following ‘ terror attacks by leaders from UK and France . At times white conservatives have been ridiculed and derided .
    what is his (Sacks) issue?

  30. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Samuel played a very destructive games in Palestine hurting the natives .

  31. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Wasn’t he appointed because he was a Jew?

  32. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    I admire your scholarship, but how can you stand reading the Bible all the time?

  33. This is relevant.

    It is proposed that Labour guarantee Jewish MP’s their seats. That way, their fears of rampant anti-semitism can be assuaged.

    https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/jewish-labour-mps-should-be-automatically-re-selected-says-john-mann-1.469148

    All animals are equal but some are more equal than others. There are twenty two Jewish members of parliament — nineteen of them representing Labour. Labour has 229 seats at the moment. Since Jews make up about a third of one percent of Britain’s population, it would follow that one would be a more appropriate number than nineteen.

    But no. Jews are to be guaranteed at least the nineteen.

    • Replies: @Otterboy
  34. Otterboy says:
    @Colin Wright

    “Labour has 229 seats at the moment. Since Jews make up about a third of one percent of Britain’s population, it would follow that one would be a more appropriate number than nineteen.

    But no. Jews are to be guaranteed at least the nineteen.”

    This is absolutely ridiculous. John Mann seems to work full time for the Israeli government via Labour Friends of Israel.

    They just don’t know when to stop

  35. Miggle says:

    I’m disgusted whenever I see the use of “anti-Semitism” to mean Judeophobia. It starts by accepting and propagating, propagating, a fundamental deception, that modern Jews are Semites. There is post-Biblical history. They are not. Even before the time of Christ, at least post-Alexander, the majority were not. But they, the Jews, invest huge resources into proving they are: because not being Semites means not being of the Tribe of Judah, not being the Chosen Race, and therefore not being Jews. The so-called religion ceases to exist.

    So this entire discussion disgusts me. But I’ve already convicted myself of anti-Semitism just by writing those few words, haven’t I? They, the Jews, I said. Anti-Semite therefore, aren’t I?

    Beyond deception, the talk of “anti-Semitism” represents oppression. No freedom of speech. Only newspeak. (I live in Oceania, by the way.) No freedom to speak objectively of what Jews have done, because we have come under the control of a system that does not allow that. As someone has pointed out here, if a man tells you he is a Jew, then later to mention him by name to someone else, and to inform that person that he is a Jew, is anti-Semitic. Who controls that system? Is it anti-Semitic to even ask that question? Definitely!

    Modern Jews, at least Ashkenazi Jews, are not Semites, they are Aryans, and they hate Semites. Sephardic Jews have traces of Arabic ancestry, and so in that sense only, traces of Semitic ancestry, but none whatsoever connected with the ancient land of Canaan or the ancient Hebrews. The Bible-era Jews of Spain didn’t have any Semitic ancestry at all.

    The only real anti-Semites in the world today are: the Jews. And they are rabidly anti-Semitic. That is because their “religion” requires them to hate anyone who is not a Jew. And a Semite, an Arab of Arabia, or a so-called Arab, really a Hebrew, of Palestine, or a so-called Arab, really an Aramean, of Syria, is not a Jew, and therefore must be hated.

    Even Jews, if they are really Semites, the tiny proportion who are, are hated by the Ashkenazi Jews, but now because racism is intrinsic to Judaism, and Semitic Jews are not whites, not of the West, don’t have the Europeanness (and I only want you to look at tbe blonde, the celebrity) that Israelis must have for Israel to be a country of the West. No: they are persons of a Middle-Eastern race, and so, revolting.

    That is the lesson of Jonathan Cook’s article about the Stolen Babies. There was a community of Semites. Jews, but they had to be wiped out. Existential threat. Steal all the babies and the community will in time cease to exist. Technically genocide, according to Cook. But they were Semites so had to be eliminated.

  36. theMann says:

    Birds gotta fly, fish gotta swim, Jews gotta whine about anti- semitism.

    Yawn, move on.

  37. huffposting says: • Website

    Poison for the Goyim: More Hysteria and Hyperbole about Labour Anti-Semitism, by Tobias Langdon – Th
    best business tips

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.