The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Patrick McDermott Archive
The Racial Realignment of American Politics
NY-14 Winner Ocasio-Cortez No Fluke--The Democratic Party IS Tipping!
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
00tippingstates

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The idea that demography is political destiny is not new. Peter Brimelow and Edwin Rubenstein warned of its dangers in the pages of National Review in the 1990s. Steve Sailer later argued that Republicans would fare better by targeting white voters.

The problem with these observations was not their accuracy, but their audience. The GOP establishment and donor elites had little interest in such thinking until Donald Trump’s breakthrough in 2016. But what happens when Trump leaves office? Will the GOP return to its old ways, as Trump’s former chief of staff Reince Priebus has predicted?

The answer is almost certainly no. The reasons have little to do with the GOP elite, however, whose views have not substantially changed. They instead have everything to do with what is happening in the other party. As Brimelow and Rubenstein recently pointed out in VDARE (and as I did at American Renaissance), while the nation is not expected to reach majority-minority status until 2045, the Democratic Party is already approaching that historic milestone.

The political consequences of these changes will be profound and irreversible. The developments that are unfolding before our eyes are not a fluke, but the beginning of a new political realignment in the United States that is increasingly focused on race.

The Emerging Majority-Minority Party

While warnings of brewing demographic trouble were being ignored by the establishment right, they received a better reception on the left. In 2004, Ruy Teixeira and John Judis wrote a book called The Emerging Democratic Majority that triumphantly predicted that demographic change would soon produce a “new progressive era.” The theory’s predictive powers waxed and waned over the years, but after Trump’s 2016 election Teixeira and another coauthor, Peter Leyden, insisted that Democrats would soon sweep away an increasingly irrelevant GOP and forcibly impose their will, much as had already happened in California.

These arguments have a glaring weakness, however. They assumed that Democrats would continue to draw the same level of support from white voters. Instead, many have been fleeing to the GOP.

Throughout the 20th Century, Democrats had won the presidency only by winning or keeping it close among these voters. Barack Obama was the first to break this pattern, defeating John McCain in 2008 while losing the white vote by 12 percent. Four years later he beat Mitt Romney while losing it by 20 percent. Hillary Clinton lost the white vote in 2016 by a similar 20-point margin.

This loss of white support, coupled with the continued demographic change of the country, has helped push the Democratic Party toward majority-minority status. Since 1992, the white share of the Democratic presidential vote has dropped an average of about one percent per year. At its current rate, it could tip to majority-minority status by 2020. It will occur no later than 2024.

The political consequences of this shift are already apparent. In 2008, Obama beat Hillary Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination with the overwhelming backing of black voters. Clinton beat Bernie Sanders in 2016 with similar black and Latino support. This year’s state elections have continued the trend, with minority candidates winning Democratic gubernatorial nominations in Georgia, Texas, New Mexico, and Maryland, with another likely win in Arizona later this year.

This sudden surge in minority candidates is not an indicator of increased open mindedness, but of demographic change. While the national Democratic Party is only just approaching majority-minority status, in much of the nation it is already there.

Nonwhite Polarization

While the demographic trend of the Democratic Party seems clear enough – as does its leftward drift and increased embrace of minority candidates – it is still possible to argue that the nation’s politics will not divide along racial lines. The most obvious alternative is that both parties will compete for minority votes and both will experience demographic change in an increasingly multiracial nation. Could this happen?

Black voters seem least likely to change. They already routinely provide Democrats with 90 percent of their votes. They are the backbone of the party, with a former president, nearly 50 members of the Congressional Black Caucus, and numerous mayors in major American cities among their ranks. Given the Democratic Party’s steadfast commitment to black issues such as affirmative action and Black Lives Matter, few are likely to be won over by the occasional attempts at Republican outreach.

Latinos also typically support Democrats in presidential elections by a 2-to-1 margin, but they have been a more serious target for Republicans, including President George W. Bush, his acolyte Karl Rove, authors of the GOP autopsy released after Mitt Romney’s 2012 loss, and occasional writers in National Review. Some have observed that many Latinos value whiteness and are more likely to self-identify as white the longer they have been in the country. In fact, some Latinos are white, particularly those from Latin America’s leadership class. Others have reported on substantial hostility that exists between Latinos and blacks that may make them more likely to see whites as natural allies.

There are several problems with these arguments. The most important are persistent race-based IQ differences that will keep most mestizos (who are the bulk of Latino immigrants) trapped at the lower end of the socioeconomic spectrum regardless of their racial identification. Arguments that they will assimilate like their European predecessors fail to explain why racial hierarchies have persisted in their home nations for hundreds of years. These inequalities probably explain the high levels of Hispanic support for government programs that are likely to keep most of them tied to the Democratic Party for the foreseeable future.

Although Asians also support Democrats by a 2-to-1 margin, they seem potentially more promising. Unlike America’s black and Latino populations, East Asians (such as Japanese and Chinese) have IQs that may be slightly higher than that of white Americans on average. Moreover, affirmative action policies backed by Democrats typically work to their detriment. However, most Asian immigrants are not East Asians and their IQs (such as those of Indians or Pakistanis) are much lower. Finally, no matter what their nationality, Asians are generally unsympathetic to whites who want to restrict nonwhite immigration. Unsurprisingly, all of these reasons have contributed to Asians moving away from the Republican Party, not toward it.

Some argue that Republicans have no choice but to accept demographic change and move left to gain minority support. The GOP may well move left in ways that are acceptable to its white working class base and help it with white moderates – such as protecting Social Security and Medicare. But it will never win a bidding war with Democrats for their base of minority voters, nor would the GOP base let it try.

White Polarization

White polarization is the mirror image of nonwhite polarization and its causes are similar. Numerous scholars have cited genetics as a basis for reciprocal altruism among closely-related kin and hostility toward outsiders among humans and in the animal kingdom in general. This ethnocentrism is instinctual, present among babies, and whites are not immune from its effects. Most are socialized to suppress their ethnocentric instincts, but they remain only a short distance beneath the surface.

Academics sometimes argue that positive direct contact is a promising strategy for overcoming racial differences, but research has shown that the negative effects are more powerful – something a cursory glance at crime statistics would confirm. Rampant white flight and segregation in neighborhoods, schools, and personal relationships provide the most definitive evidence on the negative influence of direct contact.

Its impact on voting is also well established, particularly for whites and blacks. The shift of white Southerners away from the Democratic Party after civil rights legislation was enacted in the 1960s was almost immediate and has remained strong ever since. White flight produced similar political advantages for Republicans in suburbs across the country during this period. Their advantage has softened since then, but primarily because the suburbs have become less white, not less segregated.

White voting is similarly affected by proximity to Hispanics. White flight and segregation are a constant in heavily Latino areas in both liberal and conservative states. The resulting political backlash in places like California and Arizona has been well-documented and confirmed by academic research. Support for President Trump has also been shown to be highly correlated with white identity and opposition to immigration.

These trends are expected to become stronger over time. Experimental research has shown that growing white awareness of demographic change makes them more conservative, less favorably disposed to minorities, and feel greater attachment to other whites. The effects are heightened the more whites think they are threatened.

The associated ideological effects are just as important. The influence of ideology is obvious in socially conservative states like North Dakota and Kansas. However, the Democrats’ growing leftward tilt has become an issue even in liberal states like those in New England, many of which now regularly elect Republicans as governors. In fact, liberal Massachusetts has had just one Democratic governor in the past quarter century.

The power of leftist ideology to drive whites together may reach its zenith if Democrats resume their attack on segregation in neighborhoods and schools. De facto segregation has protected white liberals from the consequences of their voting decisions for years. If Democrats are returned to power, however, they appear ready to touch this electoral third rail.

International Lessons

Further evidence of racial polarization can be found by looking abroad. Ethnic conflict has been a constant in human relations – everywhere and throughout history. More recently, 64 percent of all civil wars since 1946 have divided along ethnic lines. Such conflicts are highly correlated with genetic diversity and ethnic polarization. Some of the worst examples, such as Yugoslavia, Rwanda, and Sudan, have included ethnic cleansing and genocide.

Race-based identity politics are just a lower form of ethnic conflict. Like ethnic conflict more generally, the strength of such politics depends on the level of ethnic diversity and corresponding racial polarization. In homogenous societies, for example, politics tends to divide along class and cultural lines. As a society becomes more diverse, however, ethnicity begins to play a growing role.

Politics and parties that are explicitly ethnically-based usually do not appear until much later, when a nation has become more diverse and has begun to suffer extreme racial polarization. Such politics have been shown to produce substantial ethnic favoritism. Their appearance is often a prelude to civil war or partition.

The United States has not reached this stage, but its future can be seen in other nations that are further down the road. One example is Brazil. While the United States will not become majority-minority until 2045, Brazil reached that milestone in 2010. For much of the 20th Century, Brazil viewed itself as a harmonious racial democracy and a model for the rest of the world, but this image has been tarnished in recent years.

The nation’s changing demographics demonstrated their power with the election of Lula da Silva in 2002 and his hand-picked successor, Dilma Rousseff, in 2010. Support for these two presidents – both members of the leftist Workers Party – was concentrated in the largely black northern half of the country, while opposition was concentrated in the mostly white south. Their victories depended on the nation’s changing demographics. Once elected, they rewarded their black supporters with substantial expansions of affirmative action and a new cash transfer system, called Bolsa Família, which disproportionately benefitted Afro-Brazilians.

Since then, Brazil’s fortunes have taken a turn for the worse. Rousseff was impeached after a massive corruption scandal in 2016. Crime has exploded. Black activists now deride the notion of “racial democracy“ and have become more militant on racial issues. An explicitly black political party has also appeared.

This has corresponded with a similar backlash in the white population. The leading candidate for the presidential election this year is Jair Bolsonaro, sometimes referred to as the Trump of the Tropics. A white separatist movement called the South is My Country is drawing substantial support. Brazilians are reportedly losing faith in democracy and becoming more receptive to military rule.

Changing Our Destiny

The preponderance of the evidence – domestic, international, historical, and scientific – suggests that American politics will continue to polarize along racial and ethnic lines. At least in the short term, Republicans will benefit as white voters flee from the other party. But will the GOP adequately capitalize on these gains?

Various elements of the GOP establishment, including the business elite and pro-immigration donors like the Koch brothers, continue to hold substantial power within the party. Reince Priebus probably echoed their views when he said, “I think post-Trump, the party basically returns to its traditional role and a traditional platform.”

Such status quo thinking ignores too much. There are numerous signs that the party is changing. Trump’s popularity within his own party is the second highest among all presidents since World War II, trailing only George W. Bush in the aftermath of 9/11. Congressional Never Trumpers like Bob Corker, Jeff Flake, and Mark Sanford have been defeated or stepped aside. Prominent columnists, analysts, and at least one former GOP leader are now declaring it Trump’s party.

These changes are not solely about Trump, however. There were signs of change before his arrival. Eric Cantor’s primary defeat in 2014 was widely attributed to softness on immigration, which met furious grassroots opposition. Moreover, if Trump’s rise were merely a one-off event, we would not be seeing the simultaneous rise of nationalist movements in Europe, which is facing its own immigration crisis.

The more likely answer is that these changes reflect something more powerful than any individual, even the president of the United States. The same survival instinct that is present in all living creatures still burns brightly within the world’s European peoples. Trump was not the cause, but a consequence – and we will not go gently into the night.

Patrick McDermott (email him) is a political analyst in Washington, DC.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 106 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Dale says:

    If the author was famous, he would be attacked relentlessly.

    Cogent analysis of the current GOP.

    The centralized state model is falling apart.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. This ethnocentrism is instinctual, observable even among babies. Whites are not immune from its effects. Most are socialized to suppress their ethnocentric instincts, but they remain only a short distance beneath the surface.

    Even the most vile race-virtuosos’ ethnocentric instincts boil to the surface in the flight to “good schools” for their children. The “Good schools” rationale works for them. Gets them away from the city, away from those awful Blacks. It was always diversity for thee. The closest most liberals get to diversity is the Hispanic housekeeper. Because the Blacks, you know, they steal the liquor/silver/Waterford”. Heard variations of this a million times..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    Exactly. Whenever liberals ask 'How are the schools?', what they really mean is, 'How black are the schools?' Their hypocrisy is nauseating.
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Actually, the "I'm colorblind" strategy is amazingly effective for white libs and cucks. It allows them to be as race realist as they want and to accuse anyone who calls them on it to be the real racist. (Btw, I don't consider the term "racist" to be an insult, but they do.)

    If you point out that they live in 90% white area, they just say that they were looking for a nice area with good schools. It could just as easily have black or Hispanic. In fact, they never noticed the color of the people living here. Why would YOU ask such a question? Did YOU look at the demographics of the area before you moved here?

    If you mention that, no, the area could not just as easily have been black or Hispanic because there are no nice areas with good schools that heavily black or Hispanic, well, that just proves how racist you are noticing such things.

    Believe me, I've been in that situation several times. People - and, especially, women - do not appreciate your pointing out their hypocrisy. If you want to bring a neighborhood party to a screeching halt, mention how your non-racist neighbors live in an overwhelmingly white suburb and send their kids to overwhelmingly white schools.

    That being said, I am seeing more and more whites starting to be more open about identity politics. They haven't yet reached the point where they indentify themselves as a member of a tribe, but they are noticing that everyone else seems to see themselves as first a member of their tribe and second as a member of this society.

    Baby steps.
    , @Wally
    In every instance where blacks & browns are in great numbers, and / or control the governments of cities, counties, regions, states, countries, & continents we see:
    massive murder rates
    massive crime in general
    degraded property
    massive disease, especially STDs
    massive drug & alcohol abuse
    general filth, squalor
    massive birthrates
    inability / unwillingness to support their own children
    massive youth pregnancies rates
    massive school dropout rates
    incredibly low IQs & test scores
    violence as a way of life
    fathers nowhere to be found

    https://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/how-to-break-up-blacklivesmatter-protest.jpg

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Brilliant synthesis. Excellent article. Patrick McDermott hits it out of the ballpark, noting correctly that ethnocentrism is “instinctual”. So true. So obvious. And this suppressed truth is just the tip of the iceberg. America lives under ‘intellectual occupation’.

    But the hardening scientific facts involving race, kinship, and phenotype are testament to the hollowness of ‘anti-racist’ rhetoric and ideologies that dominate so much of the American landscape.

    These liberal creeds pretend to repudiate (all) ‘racism’ and bigotry, but in political fact, they strategically target only white Americans. This makes these lofty ‘values’ not only disingenuous but unfair and destructive.

    Highfalutin (but bogus) liberalism has come to play a diabolical role. It undermines white cohesion and white solidarity. Meanwhile, from high above, irreversible demographic changes are being orchestrated.

    MacDermott correctly observes that the West’s unsought ethno-racial transformation is what’s behind the reinvigoration of white identity in Europe and America. This at least is good news.

    Says MacDermott:

    “Ethnic conflict has been a constant in human relations—everywhere and throughout history. More recently, 64 percent of all civil wars since 1946 have divided along ethnic lines. Such conflicts are highly correlated with genetic diversity and ethnic polarization. Some of the worst examples, such as Yugoslavia, Rwanda, and Sudan, have included ethnic cleansing and genocide.”

    Very true. Very important. And while MacDermott avoids mentioning a more obvious example, the most persistent expression of this phenomena can be seen in Israel/Palestine, where allegedly ‘Semitic’ Jews are doing whatever it takes to keep their lesser (Semitic) cousins at arms length–in this case, in the caged ghettos of Gaza and the West Bank.

    Undue and uncompromising Jewish influence in Zio-America is allowing this race-born outrage to continue. Sadly, Israeli savagery routinely receives Zio-Washington’s unconditional blessing, trillion-dollar subsidy, and unflinching diplomatic cover.

    But besides the disputed territory and Israel’s untouchable political power, what nourishes the endless Israel/Palestine impasse?

    Jewish ‘exceptionalism’ is one key motivator.

    The Chosen people are convinced that they are born vastly superior to their Semitic cousins.

    Thus, strict segregation is required for the assurance of ‘Jewish (genetic) continuity’. This objective however requires steadfast cruelty since the natives are still restless and rebelling.

    Supremacism means never having to say you’re sorry. This is especially true since, ironically, peace between Jews and Arabs could potentially lead to increased Jewish ‘outmarriage’ in Israel and consequently, the gradual reduction in Israeli (Jewish) IQ and Jewish ‘exceptionalism’ (supremacy).

    Over time, potential genetic intermingling would very possibly undermine Jewish magnificence and therefore, Jewish cohesion. This could then translate into a loss of Jewish solidarity and ‘community’. It’s possible.

    This downturn could subsequently affect Jewish wealth and power, and that is certainly not an outcome that the Jewish community desires.

    Leaders of the global Jewish community are smart enough to envision this scenario and to prevent it from happening. They use The Holocaust (and it’s potential re-0currance) as an all-purpose excuse. But it’s phony. Self-segregation is a sacred, ancient Jewish value. Thus the glamorization of interracial romance is directed only at the goyim, as is the message of Open Borders. Just turn on your TV. It’s there constantly.

    These ‘liberal, democratic’ messages however are never advocated in Israel, nor are they directed at young Jews via Israeli TV, news, entertainment or education.

    You will never see glamorous depictions of Jewish/Arab miscegenation on Israeli television, even though black/white ‘family formation’ on Jewish-owned mass media in America is ubiquitous.

    Hostile US elites (Jews) apparently want non-Jewish whites to become mixed, brown. This racial objective however is anathema to Jewish values. It’s strictly for the goyim.

    Meanwhile, whites in America are not permitted to think or hold values like Israeli Jews, or to even express similar preferences inside the civilization that they and their forefathers created. This speaks volumes about the lack of freedom in America. Yes, we live under intellectual occupation.

    For many Israeli Jews (the dominant thinking goes) strict segregation–if not active warfare–is the only sure way to maintain ‘hafrada’ (separation) for Jews in Israel since they are surrounded by tens of millions of similar-looking but ‘unexceptional’ Arabs.

    Unlike America, walls (and segregation) remain sacred in Israel. But not here.

    It’s racist!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gordo
    You are correct.
    , @Wally
    said:
    "They use The Holocaust (and it’s potential re-0currance) as an all-purpose excuse. But it’s phony."

    Phony indeed, at it's very core.

    The alleged & utterly impossible '6,000,000 Jews' is phony as can be, and BTW, Jews have been trying it since at least 1823.

    It's THE most useful tool Jews have for forcing their agenda upon everyone. That usefulness was the prime reason for inventing it in the first place. I know it, everyone knows it.

    Come to terms with being duped about the fake '6,000,000 Jews', the support getting '5,000,000 others', & the laughable 'gas chambers' and the ugly world we are witnessing changes drastically for the better. Nothing really changes until then.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Iberiano says:

    In fact, some Latinos are white, particularly those from Latin America’s leadership class…

    I think the reality is, Latinos/Hispanics simply form lines like any group would do. I am white, all my fellow Hispanic friends are white, and we consider ourselves essentially an ethnicity within Whiteness, just like Italians, or high-caste French Creoles, White Persians, Lebanese or Jordanians.

    The easiest way to tell if an “ethnic” is conservative or republican (outside of obvious virtue signalers), is to ask yourself, “Is this person white?”. Other than famous actors and political types that have the luxury being “liberal” (e.g. Salma Hayek) every day Hispanics, Persians and Arabs that are white, act, do and think, like every day White Anglo-Saxons, Germanics and Nordics–for the most part (obviously IQ plays a part). Don’t get me wrong, there is a difference in IQ and mindset in the particulars between a Norman and a (white-ish) Sicilian, some IQ, some cultural, but if and when a civil war comes–no one will have ANY problem knowing where they and others stand and belong.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Watch 'Latino' TV and what do you see?

    Almost all Euro-whites, very few Indians, very few mestizos.

    Have a look at the Mexican Congress, almost all euro-white.

    https://www.vosizneias.com/assets/uploads/news_photos/thumbnails/600_velbbsqa1abaemdvdohe1pwyilzloavq.jpg
    , @Them Guys
    If a civil war comes, its more likely to be a combo race war also. And about the only problem then for whites will be that, most blacks and various black-like-others, they most all look the same.

    If such happens, your skin color will be your uniform. And the side you will be on. Some folks, even white folk may whine or cry about these facts. But it is what it is. And its not whiteys that created this mess. Well, I guess I should say not non-liberal whiteys. But I'd expect if a real shtf racial civil war combo erupts in America, many lib dem current negro lover and defenders of all issues African black and mex brown. Are fast going to awaken as soon as they first run to be at the side of africans, only to discover that typically blacks do not like white folk.

    Yes blacks often act as if they love whiteys in return, but that's not real for most. And if such events kick off for real, those lib white negro lovers are going to be the very first up to bat, with blacks holding those bats and smacking down lib whiteys that were so deluded to think otherwise.

    I base it upon being born in and living in Detroit, and several close by areas related to Detroit for 43 years before I moved 23 years ago. I saw such happen to stupid lib whites more often than I can count. They never get it until too late.

    Plus at point of actual armed conflict, not many lib lefty whites that spent entire lives in love with every African cause, are going to find many non-lib whites willing to accommodate them due to lack of Trust factors.....In other words, of all groups and how they will fair in such a racial/civil war event. The lefty lib white negro lover group will fair worse than all others, even worse than African blacks will. The lefty lib whites will be hated by all sides then.

    So at this late point in time, as to What should we do?...Buy and stack more Ammo. Best to have and never need, than go without at critical junctions eh. Oh, also be sure to own firearms, or ammo is useless.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Reince Priebus: “I think post-Trump, the party basically returns to its traditional role and traditional platform.”

    And that would be U.S. hegemony and market fundamentalism? Unlikely and unattractive. U.S. military dominance starves our society and enriches the national security state and the rogue regimes in Tel Aviv and Riyadh. Market fundamentalism does not take into account human frailty, and would produce widespread desperation.

    What can be gleaned from Mr. McDermott’s instructive article is that, like it or not, identity needs to be included in the political lexicon of working class and middle class whites. Elite whites continue to cede power to blacks and browns in politics and business as the slide into Idiocracy accelerates. This is an opportunity for disaffected whites from the Democratic Party and Republican Trump supporters to form a coalition.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  6. densa says:

    The political consequences of these changes will be profound and irreversible.

    When Ted Kennedy was pushing the 1965 opening of our borders to atone for racism, he made repeated assurances that we would not end up where we ended up. He said the level of immigration would remain the same, the ethnic mix would not inundate America with immigrants from any particular place or nation, that the ethnic pattern of America would not be changed, and that we wouldn’t have something crazy like a million immigrants a year, certainly not poor ones who would place a burden on citizens.

    When Reagan’s amnesty happened, again promises where made that we could and would keep our country. Now, it looks like Brazil is our future.

    Elections are already being decided by racial votes of minorities, which aren’t considered racist by that half of America that eagerly anticipates our demise. What a rude surprise they are in for when they discover they are still white and will be honorary deplorables once they no longer have political power.

    But will the GOP adequately capitalize on these gains?

    Ha, Derbyshire doesn’t call it the Stupid Party for nothing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. Regarding my home state of Arizona, that 66% figure is an interesting anomaly. Except for my fellow writers, most of the white folks I know are pretty conservative. Many secretly supported Trump or voted Libertarian in protest of the lousy mainstream choices. Perhaps this is a reflection of white flight from California.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. You dense “scientific” racists can’t see the forest for the trees, as is always the case. The importance of this election has nothing to do with demographics. But you wouldn’t know that because all you want to do is scream raceracerace all de liblong day.

    No. The importance of this race is that Ocasio-Cortez is “a strikingly perfect candidate, both in policy positions and refusal to take corporate money. She fits the identity politics profile without once using identity politics virtue-signaling to cover for lousy policies. This is shattering to the Clintonista crowd, who are spinning like tops.”

    Grow up.

    Read More
    • Replies: @WAlly
    'The Left needs to face reality: Trump is winning'

    https://nypost.com/2018/06/30/the-left-needs-to-face-reality-trump-is-winning/
    , @Wally
    And watch Ocasio-Cortez cave in about her supporting BDS and criticizing Zionism.

    Ocasio-Cortez 'poor woman of the people' ... NOT
    see:
    'Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the ‘girl from the Bronx,’ raised in one of wealthiest US counties'
    https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/06/30/report-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-the-girl-from-the-bronx-raised-in-one-of-wealthiest-us-counties

    , @Them Guys
    You better Read what Wally(?) Posted about her in last article on her dem win. She is No little disempowered and poor, poor little colored NY girl that made it big all on her own. She lived in a different area than her voters and grew up very well to do. In other words she's just another typical lefty kommie dem, same as the rest..Lies to win elections? Natch and A-OK.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Post Imperial America will balkanize. There is plenty of room for four or more new republics. At least one of them will be white.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    Disaggregation is the only positive way forward for the US.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    There is plenty of room for four or more new republics. At least one of them will be white.
     
    We already have fifty republics. Some-- Montana, Vermont, Wyoming, New Hampshire-- are already white.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. @Jim Christian

    This ethnocentrism is instinctual, observable even among babies. Whites are not immune from its effects. Most are socialized to suppress their ethnocentric instincts, but they remain only a short distance beneath the surface.
     
    Even the most vile race-virtuosos' ethnocentric instincts boil to the surface in the flight to "good schools" for their children. The "Good schools" rationale works for them. Gets them away from the city, away from those awful Blacks. It was always diversity for thee. The closest most liberals get to diversity is the Hispanic housekeeper. Because the Blacks, you know, they steal the liquor/silver/Waterford". Heard variations of this a million times..

    Exactly. Whenever liberals ask ‘How are the schools?’, what they really mean is, ‘How black are the schools?’ Their hypocrisy is nauseating.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Boom! Bingo!!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. However, most Asian immigrants are not East Asians and their IQs (such as those of Indians or Pakistanis) are much lower.

    Really? How come so many are doctors, scientists and computer programmers? Those aren’t typically low-IQ professions. Is this just a case of aggressive brain-drain? Do all the stupid ones stay behind in India?

    In homogenous societies, for example, politics tends to divide along class and cultural lines. As a society becomes more diverse, however, ethnicity begins to play a growing role.

    Yup. That’s probably why the Democratic Party traded class war for race war.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    Really? How come so many are doctors, scientists and computer programmers? Those aren’t typically low-IQ professions. Is this just a case of aggressive brain-drain? Do all the stupid ones stay behind in India?
     
    Careful. People like me, Thorfinsson, and DB Cooper all got labeled as 'Indians' just for pointing out the exact same thing. You might get inflicted with the same.

    To answer your question :

    The typical WN wigger (Patrick McDermott among them), just cannot process the layer of complexity you have introduced. It is just too far above their pay grade.

    Plus, what if a country's GDP per capita grew 3% in a year, or 35% in 10 years? Did the IQ of that country rise in such a short time? A lot of 85-IQ countries of today have the same inflation-adjusted prosperity level as what some 100-IQ countries had just 15 years ago. But the typical White Trashionalist cannot process this complexity, and quickly gets in over their head.

    Remember that the typical White Trashionalist has an IQ of just 70.

    , @DanFromCT
    Why are there so many Paki and Indian docs running around? You’re kidding, right? if you don’t realize it’s to enhance the dollar value of an American medical education by artificially restricting supply, in turn primarily benefitting another group whose intellectual superiority is also smoke and mirrors concealing unmerited preferment of biblical proportions.

    In India, unless I’m mistaken and but for a small handful of elite medical schools, the education is about that of a nurse over here—except that over there not only are “seats” for sale, but so are grades, and the heaviest work is prepping for the states’ physician licensing exams over here. It appears these people are being brought in through AMA connivance and allowed to practice medicine in America to meet the existing demand—the public be damned—so that no new medical schools that demographics would have filled with American kids are ever built.

    To follow your point to its conclusion, if the Chinese, Indians, and, for example, the Israelis are such scientific and techno geniuses, why do their successes in almost all cases derive from what they’ve stolen from us?
    , @Anonymous Jew

    Really? How come so many are doctors, scientists and computer programmers? Those aren’t typically low-IQ professions. Is this just a case of aggressive brain-drain? Do all the stupid ones stay behind in India?
     
    Agree - this was the article's sole fault. I've seen data suggesting that the children of East Indians may be out outperforming Jews. However, if you look at data from their home countries and certain other East Indian populations around the world (not sure if anyone has data from adoption studies), it's clear East Indian success in the US/UK is due solely to highly selective immigration.

    I live and work in the Bay Area and know countless Indian uber-professionals (STEM PhDs, Stanford grads, Ivy League MBAs and on and on). The primary problem with every single one I've encountered is that they gulp down the SSSM-Cultural Marxist claptrap like a hungry dog eating spilled food. I was recently having a beer with an Indian Ivy League MBA and slipped into the conversation that low-skilled Latinos are under-performing, going on four generations. His reply was along the lines of "well, that's why we need to invest more money into their schools and communities." He's my friend, so I buried the urge to slap him in the face.

    I'm not sure how US East Indians' political leanings well evolve in the future. However, I'm worried that they will become the new Jews - taking on all the worst qualities of the 80% of US Jews that lean just to the left of Marx.

    In the future, East Indians may be useful in quelling some of the racial resentment brewing in the Brown underclass. Over the next few decades, we'll see East Indians (and half-White EA - I know a few Indian-White uber-professional couples with kids) climb to the top. Will the Mestizos look at some of the dark brown faces inhabiting the mansions they service as menial workers and think "there are brown people like me at the top" or will they think these are the new Jews, responsible for [insert latest conspiracy theory].

    , @George
    Another interesting New York City result* was Carolyn Maloney vs Suraj Patel. Maloney like Crowley is a long time NY pol, except she won against Patel. Patel got about as many votes as ¡Ocasio! did.

    A funny aspect of the Patel campaign is Patel was accused of getting financing from India-ana. His immigrant parents apparently own a hospitality industry empire in the Hoosier state and wrote him a big check to get him started in NYC politics. Raising the question: Who let these Indianan Patels into New York City? Can't we build a wall along the Delaware Water Gap?

    One reason NYC has so much money is people from flyover states and elsewhere keep financing their kids' lifestyle and silly dreams in NYC. I tend to think election $$$ would go further in Indiana. But he might have to convert to Baptist like VP Pence did.

    * I guess only NYC results are interesting

    NYC election results including District 12 Maloney v Patel.
    https://www.politico.com/election-results/2018/new-york/

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. Really? How come so many are doctors, scientists and computer programmers?

    The advance guard in the US was the professional elite. Not so in the UK. Subcontinentals are much closer, or even below, average there. Even here, motel owners may outnumber doctors, scientists, and computer programmers combined.

    Is this just a case of aggressive brain-drain?

    Yes.

    And it’s worse in Canada.

    Do all the stupid ones stay behind in India?

    There are a billion more people in India than in the US. Do the arithmetic.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thomm

    Not so in the UK. Subcontinentals are much closer, or even below, average there.
     
    False. It appears that Indians outperform whites and Chinese even in the UK (albeit not by as wide of a margin as in the US and Canada) :

    https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/work-pay-and-benefits/pay-and-income/household-income/latest

    Pakistanis underperform, though, even though they are much more Caucasian than Indians. So it is not about race, apparently.

    Taking this IQ assumption to an absurd extreme clearly has many flaws.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. George says:

    Extremely low turnout led to Ocasio-Cortez Victory.

    On Magical Thinking VS Sober Analysis of the Ocasio-Cortez Victory in NY

    https://www.blackagendareport.com/magical-thinking-vs-sober-analysis-ocasio-cortez-victory-ny

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  14. OK. I’ll make it simple for you because your understanding doesn’t extend beyond simple.

    Ocasio-Cortez is a very good candidate, and, unless she is co-opted–which, 99 out of a 100 (notice my use of “statistics,” I mean damned lies, you statistics-worshipers) is the chance she will be–she is a hundred times better than Crowley the Clintonite hack. Racists are really stupid. They vote against their own interests, just like all “conservatives.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. The author throws around ‘left’ and ‘right’ as if they transparently applied in the case of ethnic politics. I would argue that it has been the economic ‘right’ that has relentlessly pursued diversity of populations – quite arguably for millennia, and certainly in the last 50 years. Some sane economic leftists realize this, although they are an endangered and shrinking group.

    However if it is the right that is the main mover in favor of diversity (empire preferred to nation state for the easier control of labor), I’m not sure what solutions there are. Whites voting for the Republican Party is not a long time viable solution since the owners of that party have fundamentally different interests than the white working class (as leftists have correctly pointed out over and over).

    Read More
    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    Leftism is concerned with power, period.

    Economics is just a tool to that end. When identity looked to be more productive, they pivoted quite gracefully.

    Welfare bureaucrats derive their power from the poor, not the working, and there are many more poor abroad than at home. Creating a welfare state thus creates a giant constituency for importing more poor, and poorer.

    One of the credos of realism has been "There are no angels, so set the devils against one another." As pie-in-the-sky as economists can be, they're closer to the truth on this one than the pro-regulation forces, who assume, by definition, that the regulators will be angels.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. Brabantian says: • Website

    Quite a superbly-sourced and compellingly-argued article here from Patrick McDermott, extraordinarily well-done even by Unz standards

    This article gives a very important snapshot of the USA political scene as a whole, one of the best I’ve read in some time

    Thanks both to Mr McDermott and to Ron Unz for posting this, look forward to more from this author

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  17. jeppo says:

    Ocasio’s victory is a nightmare for the Democrats. The Leftist media is touting her as the future of the party, but her platform makes Obama look like a rightwing extremist.

    - Federal Jobs Guarantee
    - Medicare for All
    - Tuition-free public college
    - Reduce prisons by 50%
    - Defund ICE

    But the real poison pill is her unwavering support for the Palestinians. I’m not making a value judgment on this or any other of her policies, but if the GOP can tag the next Democratic presidential candidate with Ocasio’s worldview, then expect a Trumpslide in 2020.

    What do the (((brains))) and (((primary funders))) behind the Democratic party think of this rising star? Here are some choice quotes from NY Jewish Week:

    To some, the stunning victory of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, an outspoken critic of Israel, over 10-term Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-Queens-Bronx), an Israel supporter, in Tuesday’s Democratic primary is seen as another nail in the coffin of Democratic support for the Jewish state.

    “If she maintains her anti-Israel stance, she will be a one-term wonder,” predicted George Arzt, a New York political operative. “I don’t think you can have someone with those views in New York City. If she moderates, she could win again. If she doesn’t, there will be massive opposition to her — maybe even a cross-over candidate from the Latino community with pro-Israel views.”

    Hank Sheinkopf, a veteran Democratic strategist, said he sees Ocasio-Cortez’s overwhelming victory — she won with 57.5 percent of the vote — as “another step in the ongoing divorce proceedings between the pro-Israel community and the Democratic Party.”

    Jeff Wiesenfeld, a former aide to both Republican and Democratic elected officials, said he read Ocasio-Cortez’s Twitter and Facebook postings and said she has voiced opinions that are “downright hostile to Israel.”

    After 60 Palestinians were killed by the Israeli military in May while attempting to breach the fence along the Israel-Gaza border, Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter: “This is a massacre. I hope my peers have the moral courage to call it such. No state or entity is absolved of mass shootings of protestors. There is no justification. Palestinian people deserve basic human dignity, as anyone else. Democrats can’t be silent about this anymore.”

    “We have never stepped into a situation in New York City in which a member of Congress starts out hostile to us,” he added. “This is a new frontier.”

    “While Jewish Democrats support much of Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s domestic policy agenda, we disagree with her past statement regarding Israel, as well as her affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of America, which supports the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement targeting Israel,” it added. “In the coming days and months, we hope to learn more about Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s views, but at the moment, her position on Israel is not in line with our values.”

    http://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/ocasio-cortezs-israel-views-seen-as-troubling/

    What will Jewish Democrats do if the Ocasio/DSA platform becomes mainstream in the Democratic party? Join up with the anti-Trump neocons and vote for a third party? While the Republicans can win nationwide elections without Jewish money and votes, there’s no evidence that the Democrats can, at least not yet.

    Another factor in Ocasio’s surprise victory, as so delicately pointed out by the noted political analyst Andrew Anglin, is that:

    “Furthermore, people want to f*ck her.”

    No shit. Her good looks and likeable personality mean that she’s likely in the media spotlight to stay, no matter how much the MSM (((gatekeepers))) might want to shield the general public from her, ahem, “problematic” views.

    As an aside, I believe her nationwide appeal is enhanced by her complete lack of the godawful, ear-grating Nuyorican accent so commonplace among her co-ethnics. In fact she speaks with a general American accent with barely even a hint of New Yorkese. I don’t know if this is part of a generalized homogenization of regional accents throughout the country, or if she affects this dialect for personal and/or political reasons. Either way, it only adds to her appeal.

    If the Ocasio-Sanders wing of the Dems continues its electoral ascendancy, then Donald Trump will start looking more and more like the moderate adult in the room compared to the infantile, gibsmedat, tantrum-throwers on the far left. Which is terrible news for the Clintonite, corporate bloodsucker wing of the Dems, but fantastic news for the rest of us.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Them Guys
    She also is forbidden by Israel Talmudic Law from wearing a skull cap, and banging her head against that roman fortress wall remains....Only Male polititions are allowed to Pander that way for jewish $$$$ and votes and support. I'm also not certain on it, but she likely is not allowed to enter those jewish Talmud studies yesheva's like male pols always do directly after they do the head bang against wall panderings to jewry and zios...This may create a massive problem for her compared to a dem male seeking election.
    , @Prester John
    See my little contribution about a proposed multi-party system. If this woman catches on, then the Democrat Party as we know it is toast. And as to the Republican Party, McConnell is right--it is indeed the Party of Trump. If so, then where does he, Lindsay Graham, Bill Kristol and his Weekly Standard etal. go?
    , @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Whether she moderates her Israel views or not, this should be a wake-up call to Jews. Hispanics, blacks and Asians either see Jews as white or, if they do separate Jews from whites, see them as "the man" keeping them down even more than gentile whites.

    Non-whites have zero guilt about the WWII holocaust (let's remember that history is chaulk full of holocausts so I refuse to captialize the one directed toward Jews and others in the early 1940s as the one and only). Jews can't guilt non-whites into doing things.

    That being said, Jews will still control the money and organization of the Dem Party as well as the media. That's a lot of power and likely will allow Jews to keep the anti-Israel views to a minimum.

    However, it's one thing to control a party of people who look like you, who generally like you, whom you can guilt on a moment's notice and who - generally - genuinely support Israel. It's a whole other ball game to barely keep the lid of a party of people who don't look like you, who generally don't like you, whom you can't guilt and who genuinely don't support Israel. The latter is a slave/master relationship and that only last as long as you have the whip and the dog. The minute those slaves think that they can kill you, they will.

    For Jewish elites, the demographic transformation of the United States (and Europe, for that matter) is hitting the point of deminishing returns and, in my opinion, actually starting to become "bad for the Jews."

    If Jewish leaders ever realize this, it's be shocking how fast the media and academia starts supporting strict immigration control.

    Either way, it's entirely possible that we may have seen "Peak Jew" in the West. Not saying that Jews won't continue to wield huge amounts of power for a long time to come. I'm just suggesting that they won't have the free reign that they had over the past 50 years.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Gordo says:
    @mark green
    Brilliant synthesis. Excellent article. Patrick McDermott hits it out of the ballpark, noting correctly that ethnocentrism is "instinctual". So true. So obvious. And this suppressed truth is just the tip of the iceberg. America lives under 'intellectual occupation'.

    But the hardening scientific facts involving race, kinship, and phenotype are testament to the hollowness of 'anti-racist' rhetoric and ideologies that dominate so much of the American landscape.

    These liberal creeds pretend to repudiate (all) 'racism' and bigotry, but in political fact, they strategically target only white Americans. This makes these lofty 'values' not only disingenuous but unfair and destructive.

    Highfalutin (but bogus) liberalism has come to play a diabolical role. It undermines white cohesion and white solidarity. Meanwhile, from high above, irreversible demographic changes are being orchestrated.

    MacDermott correctly observes that the West's unsought ethno-racial transformation is what's behind the reinvigoration of white identity in Europe and America. This at least is good news.

    Says MacDermott:

    "Ethnic conflict has been a constant in human relations—everywhere and throughout history. More recently, 64 percent of all civil wars since 1946 have divided along ethnic lines. Such conflicts are highly correlated with genetic diversity and ethnic polarization. Some of the worst examples, such as Yugoslavia, Rwanda, and Sudan, have included ethnic cleansing and genocide."

    Very true. Very important. And while MacDermott avoids mentioning a more obvious example, the most persistent expression of this phenomena can be seen in Israel/Palestine, where allegedly 'Semitic' Jews are doing whatever it takes to keep their lesser (Semitic) cousins at arms length--in this case, in the caged ghettos of Gaza and the West Bank.

    Undue and uncompromising Jewish influence in Zio-America is allowing this race-born outrage to continue. Sadly, Israeli savagery routinely receives Zio-Washington's unconditional blessing, trillion-dollar subsidy, and unflinching diplomatic cover.

    But besides the disputed territory and Israel's untouchable political power, what nourishes the endless Israel/Palestine impasse?

    Jewish 'exceptionalism' is one key motivator.

    The Chosen people are convinced that they are born vastly superior to their Semitic cousins.

    Thus, strict segregation is required for the assurance of 'Jewish (genetic) continuity'. This objective however requires steadfast cruelty since the natives are still restless and rebelling.

    Supremacism means never having to say you're sorry. This is especially true since, ironically, peace between Jews and Arabs could potentially lead to increased Jewish 'outmarriage' in Israel and consequently, the gradual reduction in Israeli (Jewish) IQ and Jewish 'exceptionalism' (supremacy).

    Over time, potential genetic intermingling would very possibly undermine Jewish magnificence and therefore, Jewish cohesion. This could then translate into a loss of Jewish solidarity and 'community'. It's possible.

    This downturn could subsequently affect Jewish wealth and power, and that is certainly not an outcome that the Jewish community desires.

    Leaders of the global Jewish community are smart enough to envision this scenario and to prevent it from happening. They use The Holocaust (and it's potential re-0currance) as an all-purpose excuse. But it's phony. Self-segregation is a sacred, ancient Jewish value. Thus the glamorization of interracial romance is directed only at the goyim, as is the message of Open Borders. Just turn on your TV. It's there constantly.

    These 'liberal, democratic' messages however are never advocated in Israel, nor are they directed at young Jews via Israeli TV, news, entertainment or education.

    You will never see glamorous depictions of Jewish/Arab miscegenation on Israeli television, even though black/white 'family formation' on Jewish-owned mass media in America is ubiquitous.

    Hostile US elites (Jews) apparently want non-Jewish whites to become mixed, brown. This racial objective however is anathema to Jewish values. It's strictly for the goyim.

    Meanwhile, whites in America are not permitted to think or hold values like Israeli Jews, or to even express similar preferences inside the civilization that they and their forefathers created. This speaks volumes about the lack of freedom in America. Yes, we live under intellectual occupation.

    For many Israeli Jews (the dominant thinking goes) strict segregation--if not active warfare--is the only sure way to maintain 'hafrada' (separation) for Jews in Israel since they are surrounded by tens of millions of similar-looking but 'unexceptional' Arabs.

    Unlike America, walls (and segregation) remain sacred in Israel. But not here.

    It's racist!

    You are correct.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. If the Ocasio-Sanders wing of the Dems continues its electoral ascendancy, the same people who voted for Trump will vote for them. You have no understanding whatsoever about the mood of the current polity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jeppo
    If the Ocasio-Sanders wing of the Dems continues its electoral ascendancy, the same people who voted for Trump will vote for them.

    So what you're saying is that if there's one thing Trump supporters secretly want more than anything else, it's to abolish ICE. Yeah, no.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. jeppo says:
    @obwandiyag
    If the Ocasio-Sanders wing of the Dems continues its electoral ascendancy, the same people who voted for Trump will vote for them. You have no understanding whatsoever about the mood of the current polity.

    If the Ocasio-Sanders wing of the Dems continues its electoral ascendancy, the same people who voted for Trump will vote for them.

    So what you’re saying is that if there’s one thing Trump supporters secretly want more than anything else, it’s to abolish ICE. Yeah, no.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar


    If the Ocasio-Sanders wing of the Dems continues its electoral ascendancy, the same people who voted for Trump will vote for them.

     

    So what you’re saying is that if there’s one thing Trump supporters secretly want more than anything else, it’s to abolish ICE. Yeah, no.

     

    This might be true in the Bronx, but what about the other 3,030 or so counties in the US?
    , @Them Guys
    Sounds like obwandiyag has been getting his info from Ebolaniquious in Detroit eh?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. @blank-misgivings
    The author throws around 'left' and 'right' as if they transparently applied in the case of ethnic politics. I would argue that it has been the economic 'right' that has relentlessly pursued diversity of populations - quite arguably for millennia, and certainly in the last 50 years. Some sane economic leftists realize this, although they are an endangered and shrinking group.

    However if it is the right that is the main mover in favor of diversity (empire preferred to nation state for the easier control of labor), I'm not sure what solutions there are. Whites voting for the Republican Party is not a long time viable solution since the owners of that party have fundamentally different interests than the white working class (as leftists have correctly pointed out over and over).

    Leftism is concerned with power, period.

    Economics is just a tool to that end. When identity looked to be more productive, they pivoted quite gracefully.

    Welfare bureaucrats derive their power from the poor, not the working, and there are many more poor abroad than at home. Creating a welfare state thus creates a giant constituency for importing more poor, and poorer.

    One of the credos of realism has been “There are no angels, so set the devils against one another.” As pie-in-the-sky as economists can be, they’re closer to the truth on this one than the pro-regulation forces, who assume, by definition, that the regulators will be angels.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. @jeppo
    If the Ocasio-Sanders wing of the Dems continues its electoral ascendancy, the same people who voted for Trump will vote for them.

    So what you're saying is that if there's one thing Trump supporters secretly want more than anything else, it's to abolish ICE. Yeah, no.

    If the Ocasio-Sanders wing of the Dems continues its electoral ascendancy, the same people who voted for Trump will vote for them.

    So what you’re saying is that if there’s one thing Trump supporters secretly want more than anything else, it’s to abolish ICE. Yeah, no.

    This might be true in the Bronx, but what about the other 3,030 or so counties in the US?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. llloyd says: • Website

    Americans, at least Unz reviewers, lump all Hispanic speakers into one category. Does Cortez even speak Spanish, except for her ethnic purposes? More important, a Puerto Rican origin is both Creole and Roman Catholic. That puts them in a category all their own. She has no love for Israel because her background did not come under the influence of the Christian Zionist Churches. Her black origins make her atavistically side with the Palestinians.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. You have no clue about “Trump supporters.” For your information, they will vote for anyone who shakes things up. Their second choice after Trump was Sanders. These are facts. Read ‘em and weep.

    Read More
    • Agree: MBlanc46
    • Replies: @Mishra
    The Establishment wants to pretend that these voters don't exist. Even though they tipped the election. Along with most people (even here) they want to keep everything in neat boxes labelled Right vs Left, Rep vs Dem, etc etc. Spares them the 'vexation of thinking'.
    , @JL
    You're an obnoxious troll, but I believe you are correct on this point. I suppose I would also point out that Trump was the second choice for more than a few "Sanders supporters". For me, anyway, this election past presidential election wasn't R vs. D, it was Trump/Sanders vs. Clinton/Bush.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Mishra says:
    @obwandiyag
    You have no clue about "Trump supporters." For your information, they will vote for anyone who shakes things up. Their second choice after Trump was Sanders. These are facts. Read 'em and weep.

    The Establishment wants to pretend that these voters don’t exist. Even though they tipped the election. Along with most people (even here) they want to keep everything in neat boxes labelled Right vs Left, Rep vs Dem, etc etc. Spares them the ‘vexation of thinking’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. Mishra says:

    The Democratic Party IS Tipping!

    Replace “The Democratic Party” with “America” and replace “IS Tipping!” with “HAS TIPPED” and you’ll be much nearer the truth.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  27. Biff says:

    I still think her(Cortez) election has a lot to do with her not being a democratic insider. All the other factors mentioned are indisputable as well.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  28. Ron Unz says:

    Actually, I have a quite contrary view of the political implications of these shifts in racial demographics. For those interested, here’s a link to a long article I published a few years ago on this same exact topic:

    http://www.unz.com/runz/immigration-republicans-and-the-end-of-white-america-singlepage/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. Thomm says:
    @Seamus Padraig

    However, most Asian immigrants are not East Asians and their IQs (such as those of Indians or Pakistanis) are much lower.
     
    Really? How come so many are doctors, scientists and computer programmers? Those aren't typically low-IQ professions. Is this just a case of aggressive brain-drain? Do all the stupid ones stay behind in India?

    In homogenous societies, for example, politics tends to divide along class and cultural lines. As a society becomes more diverse, however, ethnicity begins to play a growing role.
     
    Yup. That's probably why the Democratic Party traded class war for race war.

    Really? How come so many are doctors, scientists and computer programmers? Those aren’t typically low-IQ professions. Is this just a case of aggressive brain-drain? Do all the stupid ones stay behind in India?

    Careful. People like me, Thorfinsson, and DB Cooper all got labeled as ‘Indians’ just for pointing out the exact same thing. You might get inflicted with the same.

    To answer your question :

    The typical WN wigger (Patrick McDermott among them), just cannot process the layer of complexity you have introduced. It is just too far above their pay grade.

    Plus, what if a country’s GDP per capita grew 3% in a year, or 35% in 10 years? Did the IQ of that country rise in such a short time? A lot of 85-IQ countries of today have the same inflation-adjusted prosperity level as what some 100-IQ countries had just 15 years ago. But the typical White Trashionalist cannot process this complexity, and quickly gets in over their head.

    Remember that the typical White Trashionalist has an IQ of just 70.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. Thomm says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Really? How come so many are doctors, scientists and computer programmers?
     
    The advance guard in the US was the professional elite. Not so in the UK. Subcontinentals are much closer, or even below, average there. Even here, motel owners may outnumber doctors, scientists, and computer programmers combined.

    Is this just a case of aggressive brain-drain?
     
    Yes.

    And it's worse in Canada.

    Do all the stupid ones stay behind in India?
     
    There are a billion more people in India than in the US. Do the arithmetic.

    Not so in the UK. Subcontinentals are much closer, or even below, average there.

    False. It appears that Indians outperform whites and Chinese even in the UK (albeit not by as wide of a margin as in the US and Canada) :

    https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/work-pay-and-benefits/pay-and-income/household-income/latest

    Pakistanis underperform, though, even though they are much more Caucasian than Indians. So it is not about race, apparently.

    Taking this IQ assumption to an absurd extreme clearly has many flaws.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. Holland and the Netherlands that emerged out of 17th century Holland stand for freedom of expression.
    That we discriminated catholics say until 1960 is not even well realised in our country.
    However, some in the (former ?) catholic part, south of the rivers, still feel second rate citizens.
    Another word for discrimination is keeping a culture intact.

    The enormous present day stupidity is focussing on a thing like slavery.
    As if slavery was a white invention.
    That all inventions that brought progress are by white man, steam engine, combustion engines, electricity, anti biotics, vaccins, railways, steamboats, airplanes, synthetic fertilizers, clean water systems, seems to be forgotten.

    Read More
    • Agree: Them Guys
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig

    That we discriminated catholics say until 1960 is not even well realised in our country.
    However, some in the (former ?) catholic part, south of the rivers, still feel second rate citizens.
     
    Several years back, I was talking to a young guy from Amsterdam and I mentioned that I had recently been to Maastricht. 'Oh, Limburg!' he said. 'We ought to give that place to the Belgians.'
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Wally says:
    @Seamus Padraig
    Exactly. Whenever liberals ask 'How are the schools?', what they really mean is, 'How black are the schools?' Their hypocrisy is nauseating.

    Boom! Bingo!!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. This article makes sense in terms of demographic trends, but doesn’t factor in the interests of American elites. I’d imagine your typical wealthy white American (socially liberal but economically conservative) would be pretty uncomfortable with a Democrat Party that’s totally dominated by NAMs and a Republican Party that focuses on white proles. A full-blown NAM Democrat Party is more likely to promote economic socialism, instead of Clinton-style neoliberalism, and a populist Republican Party is more likely to advocate for explicitly nationalist measures like staunch protectionism and hard line immigration policies.

    Hence, American elites have an interest in making sure the Democrats gain a certain percentage of white voters, and making sure the Republicans don’t completely capture the white prole vote.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    Very astute analysis of US politics for a foreigner.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Wally says:
    @mark green
    Brilliant synthesis. Excellent article. Patrick McDermott hits it out of the ballpark, noting correctly that ethnocentrism is "instinctual". So true. So obvious. And this suppressed truth is just the tip of the iceberg. America lives under 'intellectual occupation'.

    But the hardening scientific facts involving race, kinship, and phenotype are testament to the hollowness of 'anti-racist' rhetoric and ideologies that dominate so much of the American landscape.

    These liberal creeds pretend to repudiate (all) 'racism' and bigotry, but in political fact, they strategically target only white Americans. This makes these lofty 'values' not only disingenuous but unfair and destructive.

    Highfalutin (but bogus) liberalism has come to play a diabolical role. It undermines white cohesion and white solidarity. Meanwhile, from high above, irreversible demographic changes are being orchestrated.

    MacDermott correctly observes that the West's unsought ethno-racial transformation is what's behind the reinvigoration of white identity in Europe and America. This at least is good news.

    Says MacDermott:

    "Ethnic conflict has been a constant in human relations—everywhere and throughout history. More recently, 64 percent of all civil wars since 1946 have divided along ethnic lines. Such conflicts are highly correlated with genetic diversity and ethnic polarization. Some of the worst examples, such as Yugoslavia, Rwanda, and Sudan, have included ethnic cleansing and genocide."

    Very true. Very important. And while MacDermott avoids mentioning a more obvious example, the most persistent expression of this phenomena can be seen in Israel/Palestine, where allegedly 'Semitic' Jews are doing whatever it takes to keep their lesser (Semitic) cousins at arms length--in this case, in the caged ghettos of Gaza and the West Bank.

    Undue and uncompromising Jewish influence in Zio-America is allowing this race-born outrage to continue. Sadly, Israeli savagery routinely receives Zio-Washington's unconditional blessing, trillion-dollar subsidy, and unflinching diplomatic cover.

    But besides the disputed territory and Israel's untouchable political power, what nourishes the endless Israel/Palestine impasse?

    Jewish 'exceptionalism' is one key motivator.

    The Chosen people are convinced that they are born vastly superior to their Semitic cousins.

    Thus, strict segregation is required for the assurance of 'Jewish (genetic) continuity'. This objective however requires steadfast cruelty since the natives are still restless and rebelling.

    Supremacism means never having to say you're sorry. This is especially true since, ironically, peace between Jews and Arabs could potentially lead to increased Jewish 'outmarriage' in Israel and consequently, the gradual reduction in Israeli (Jewish) IQ and Jewish 'exceptionalism' (supremacy).

    Over time, potential genetic intermingling would very possibly undermine Jewish magnificence and therefore, Jewish cohesion. This could then translate into a loss of Jewish solidarity and 'community'. It's possible.

    This downturn could subsequently affect Jewish wealth and power, and that is certainly not an outcome that the Jewish community desires.

    Leaders of the global Jewish community are smart enough to envision this scenario and to prevent it from happening. They use The Holocaust (and it's potential re-0currance) as an all-purpose excuse. But it's phony. Self-segregation is a sacred, ancient Jewish value. Thus the glamorization of interracial romance is directed only at the goyim, as is the message of Open Borders. Just turn on your TV. It's there constantly.

    These 'liberal, democratic' messages however are never advocated in Israel, nor are they directed at young Jews via Israeli TV, news, entertainment or education.

    You will never see glamorous depictions of Jewish/Arab miscegenation on Israeli television, even though black/white 'family formation' on Jewish-owned mass media in America is ubiquitous.

    Hostile US elites (Jews) apparently want non-Jewish whites to become mixed, brown. This racial objective however is anathema to Jewish values. It's strictly for the goyim.

    Meanwhile, whites in America are not permitted to think or hold values like Israeli Jews, or to even express similar preferences inside the civilization that they and their forefathers created. This speaks volumes about the lack of freedom in America. Yes, we live under intellectual occupation.

    For many Israeli Jews (the dominant thinking goes) strict segregation--if not active warfare--is the only sure way to maintain 'hafrada' (separation) for Jews in Israel since they are surrounded by tens of millions of similar-looking but 'unexceptional' Arabs.

    Unlike America, walls (and segregation) remain sacred in Israel. But not here.

    It's racist!

    said:
    “They use The Holocaust (and it’s potential re-0currance) as an all-purpose excuse. But it’s phony.”

    Phony indeed, at it’s very core.

    The alleged & utterly impossible ’6,000,000 Jews’ is phony as can be, and BTW, Jews have been trying it since at least 1823.

    It’s THE most useful tool Jews have for forcing their agenda upon everyone. That usefulness was the prime reason for inventing it in the first place. I know it, everyone knows it.

    Come to terms with being duped about the fake ’6,000,000 Jews’, the support getting ’5,000,000 others’, & the laughable ‘gas chambers’ and the ugly world we are witnessing changes drastically for the better. Nothing really changes until then.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. WAlly says:
    @obwandiyag
    You dense "scientific" racists can't see the forest for the trees, as is always the case. The importance of this election has nothing to do with demographics. But you wouldn't know that because all you want to do is scream raceracerace all de liblong day.

    No. The importance of this race is that Ocasio-Cortez is "a strikingly perfect candidate, both in policy positions and refusal to take corporate money. She fits the identity politics profile without once using identity politics virtue-signaling to cover for lousy policies. This is shattering to the Clintonista crowd, who are spinning like tops."

    Grow up.

    ‘The Left needs to face reality: Trump is winning’

    https://nypost.com/2018/06/30/the-left-needs-to-face-reality-trump-is-winning/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. Wally says:
    @Iberiano
    In fact, some Latinos are white, particularly those from Latin America’s leadership class...

    I think the reality is, Latinos/Hispanics simply form lines like any group would do. I am white, all my fellow Hispanic friends are white, and we consider ourselves essentially an ethnicity within Whiteness, just like Italians, or high-caste French Creoles, White Persians, Lebanese or Jordanians.

    The easiest way to tell if an "ethnic" is conservative or republican (outside of obvious virtue signalers), is to ask yourself, "Is this person white?". Other than famous actors and political types that have the luxury being "liberal" (e.g. Salma Hayek) every day Hispanics, Persians and Arabs that are white, act, do and think, like every day White Anglo-Saxons, Germanics and Nordics--for the most part (obviously IQ plays a part). Don't get me wrong, there is a difference in IQ and mindset in the particulars between a Norman and a (white-ish) Sicilian, some IQ, some cultural, but if and when a civil war comes--no one will have ANY problem knowing where they and others stand and belong.

    Watch ‘Latino’ TV and what do you see?

    Almost all Euro-whites, very few Indians, very few mestizos.

    Have a look at the Mexican Congress, almost all euro-white.

    Read More
    • Agree: Anonymous Jew
    • Replies: @Anonymous Jew
    Outgoing Enrique Peña Nieto looks like a businessman from Madrid. I doubt he has any Indio blood. Same throughout all of Latin America.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. Wally says:
    @obwandiyag
    You dense "scientific" racists can't see the forest for the trees, as is always the case. The importance of this election has nothing to do with demographics. But you wouldn't know that because all you want to do is scream raceracerace all de liblong day.

    No. The importance of this race is that Ocasio-Cortez is "a strikingly perfect candidate, both in policy positions and refusal to take corporate money. She fits the identity politics profile without once using identity politics virtue-signaling to cover for lousy policies. This is shattering to the Clintonista crowd, who are spinning like tops."

    Grow up.

    And watch Ocasio-Cortez cave in about her supporting BDS and criticizing Zionism.

    Ocasio-Cortez ‘poor woman of the people’ … NOT
    see:
    ‘Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the ‘girl from the Bronx,’ raised in one of wealthiest US counties’

    https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/06/30/report-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-the-girl-from-the-bronx-raised-in-one-of-wealthiest-us-counties

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. Them Guys says:
    @Iberiano
    In fact, some Latinos are white, particularly those from Latin America’s leadership class...

    I think the reality is, Latinos/Hispanics simply form lines like any group would do. I am white, all my fellow Hispanic friends are white, and we consider ourselves essentially an ethnicity within Whiteness, just like Italians, or high-caste French Creoles, White Persians, Lebanese or Jordanians.

    The easiest way to tell if an "ethnic" is conservative or republican (outside of obvious virtue signalers), is to ask yourself, "Is this person white?". Other than famous actors and political types that have the luxury being "liberal" (e.g. Salma Hayek) every day Hispanics, Persians and Arabs that are white, act, do and think, like every day White Anglo-Saxons, Germanics and Nordics--for the most part (obviously IQ plays a part). Don't get me wrong, there is a difference in IQ and mindset in the particulars between a Norman and a (white-ish) Sicilian, some IQ, some cultural, but if and when a civil war comes--no one will have ANY problem knowing where they and others stand and belong.

    If a civil war comes, its more likely to be a combo race war also. And about the only problem then for whites will be that, most blacks and various black-like-others, they most all look the same.

    If such happens, your skin color will be your uniform. And the side you will be on. Some folks, even white folk may whine or cry about these facts. But it is what it is. And its not whiteys that created this mess. Well, I guess I should say not non-liberal whiteys. But I’d expect if a real shtf racial civil war combo erupts in America, many lib dem current negro lover and defenders of all issues African black and mex brown. Are fast going to awaken as soon as they first run to be at the side of africans, only to discover that typically blacks do not like white folk.

    Yes blacks often act as if they love whiteys in return, but that’s not real for most. And if such events kick off for real, those lib white negro lovers are going to be the very first up to bat, with blacks holding those bats and smacking down lib whiteys that were so deluded to think otherwise.

    I base it upon being born in and living in Detroit, and several close by areas related to Detroit for 43 years before I moved 23 years ago. I saw such happen to stupid lib whites more often than I can count. They never get it until too late.

    Plus at point of actual armed conflict, not many lib lefty whites that spent entire lives in love with every African cause, are going to find many non-lib whites willing to accommodate them due to lack of Trust factors…..In other words, of all groups and how they will fair in such a racial/civil war event. The lefty lib white negro lover group will fair worse than all others, even worse than African blacks will. The lefty lib whites will be hated by all sides then.

    So at this late point in time, as to What should we do?…Buy and stack more Ammo. Best to have and never need, than go without at critical junctions eh. Oh, also be sure to own firearms, or ammo is useless.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. Them Guys says:
    @obwandiyag
    You dense "scientific" racists can't see the forest for the trees, as is always the case. The importance of this election has nothing to do with demographics. But you wouldn't know that because all you want to do is scream raceracerace all de liblong day.

    No. The importance of this race is that Ocasio-Cortez is "a strikingly perfect candidate, both in policy positions and refusal to take corporate money. She fits the identity politics profile without once using identity politics virtue-signaling to cover for lousy policies. This is shattering to the Clintonista crowd, who are spinning like tops."

    Grow up.

    You better Read what Wally(?) Posted about her in last article on her dem win. She is No little disempowered and poor, poor little colored NY girl that made it big all on her own. She lived in a different area than her voters and grew up very well to do. In other words she’s just another typical lefty kommie dem, same as the rest..Lies to win elections? Natch and A-OK.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. Them Guys says:
    @jeppo
    Ocasio's victory is a nightmare for the Democrats. The Leftist media is touting her as the future of the party, but her platform makes Obama look like a rightwing extremist.

    - Federal Jobs Guarantee
    - Medicare for All
    - Tuition-free public college
    - Reduce prisons by 50%
    - Defund ICE

    But the real poison pill is her unwavering support for the Palestinians. I'm not making a value judgment on this or any other of her policies, but if the GOP can tag the next Democratic presidential candidate with Ocasio's worldview, then expect a Trumpslide in 2020.

    What do the (((brains))) and (((primary funders))) behind the Democratic party think of this rising star? Here are some choice quotes from NY Jewish Week:

    To some, the stunning victory of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, an outspoken critic of Israel, over 10-term Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-Queens-Bronx), an Israel supporter, in Tuesday’s Democratic primary is seen as another nail in the coffin of Democratic support for the Jewish state.

    “If she maintains her anti-Israel stance, she will be a one-term wonder,” predicted George Arzt, a New York political operative. “I don’t think you can have someone with those views in New York City. If she moderates, she could win again. If she doesn’t, there will be massive opposition to her — maybe even a cross-over candidate from the Latino community with pro-Israel views.”

    Hank Sheinkopf, a veteran Democratic strategist, said he sees Ocasio-Cortez’s overwhelming victory — she won with 57.5 percent of the vote — as “another step in the ongoing divorce proceedings between the pro-Israel community and the Democratic Party.”

    Jeff Wiesenfeld, a former aide to both Republican and Democratic elected officials, said he read Ocasio-Cortez’s Twitter and Facebook postings and said she has voiced opinions that are “downright hostile to Israel.”

    After 60 Palestinians were killed by the Israeli military in May while attempting to breach the fence along the Israel-Gaza border, Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter: “This is a massacre. I hope my peers have the moral courage to call it such. No state or entity is absolved of mass shootings of protestors. There is no justification. Palestinian people deserve basic human dignity, as anyone else. Democrats can’t be silent about this anymore.”

    “We have never stepped into a situation in New York City in which a member of Congress starts out hostile to us,” he added. “This is a new frontier.”

    “While Jewish Democrats support much of Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s domestic policy agenda, we disagree with her past statement regarding Israel, as well as her affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of America, which supports the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement targeting Israel,” it added. “In the coming days and months, we hope to learn more about Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s views, but at the moment, her position on Israel is not in line with our values.”

    http://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/ocasio-cortezs-israel-views-seen-as-troubling/

    What will Jewish Democrats do if the Ocasio/DSA platform becomes mainstream in the Democratic party? Join up with the anti-Trump neocons and vote for a third party? While the Republicans can win nationwide elections without Jewish money and votes, there's no evidence that the Democrats can, at least not yet.

    Another factor in Ocasio's surprise victory, as so delicately pointed out by the noted political analyst Andrew Anglin, is that:

    "Furthermore, people want to f*ck her."

    No shit. Her good looks and likeable personality mean that she's likely in the media spotlight to stay, no matter how much the MSM (((gatekeepers))) might want to shield the general public from her, ahem, "problematic" views.

    As an aside, I believe her nationwide appeal is enhanced by her complete lack of the godawful, ear-grating Nuyorican accent so commonplace among her co-ethnics. In fact she speaks with a general American accent with barely even a hint of New Yorkese. I don't know if this is part of a generalized homogenization of regional accents throughout the country, or if she affects this dialect for personal and/or political reasons. Either way, it only adds to her appeal.

    If the Ocasio-Sanders wing of the Dems continues its electoral ascendancy, then Donald Trump will start looking more and more like the moderate adult in the room compared to the infantile, gibsmedat, tantrum-throwers on the far left. Which is terrible news for the Clintonite, corporate bloodsucker wing of the Dems, but fantastic news for the rest of us.

    She also is forbidden by Israel Talmudic Law from wearing a skull cap, and banging her head against that roman fortress wall remains….Only Male polititions are allowed to Pander that way for jewish $$$$ and votes and support. I’m also not certain on it, but she likely is not allowed to enter those jewish Talmud studies yesheva’s like male pols always do directly after they do the head bang against wall panderings to jewry and zios…This may create a massive problem for her compared to a dem male seeking election.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. Them Guys says:
    @jeppo
    If the Ocasio-Sanders wing of the Dems continues its electoral ascendancy, the same people who voted for Trump will vote for them.

    So what you're saying is that if there's one thing Trump supporters secretly want more than anything else, it's to abolish ICE. Yeah, no.

    Sounds like obwandiyag has been getting his info from Ebolaniquious in Detroit eh?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Renoman says:

    As long as Whitey has the money and the guns we be runnin er no matter who’s name is on the sign, that is if Israel says it’s OK.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  43. JL says:
    @obwandiyag
    You have no clue about "Trump supporters." For your information, they will vote for anyone who shakes things up. Their second choice after Trump was Sanders. These are facts. Read 'em and weep.

    You’re an obnoxious troll, but I believe you are correct on this point. I suppose I would also point out that Trump was the second choice for more than a few “Sanders supporters”. For me, anyway, this election past presidential election wasn’t R vs. D, it was Trump/Sanders vs. Clinton/Bush.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. DanFromCT says:
    @Seamus Padraig

    However, most Asian immigrants are not East Asians and their IQs (such as those of Indians or Pakistanis) are much lower.
     
    Really? How come so many are doctors, scientists and computer programmers? Those aren't typically low-IQ professions. Is this just a case of aggressive brain-drain? Do all the stupid ones stay behind in India?

    In homogenous societies, for example, politics tends to divide along class and cultural lines. As a society becomes more diverse, however, ethnicity begins to play a growing role.
     
    Yup. That's probably why the Democratic Party traded class war for race war.

    Why are there so many Paki and Indian docs running around? You’re kidding, right? if you don’t realize it’s to enhance the dollar value of an American medical education by artificially restricting supply, in turn primarily benefitting another group whose intellectual superiority is also smoke and mirrors concealing unmerited preferment of biblical proportions.

    In India, unless I’m mistaken and but for a small handful of elite medical schools, the education is about that of a nurse over here—except that over there not only are “seats” for sale, but so are grades, and the heaviest work is prepping for the states’ physician licensing exams over here. It appears these people are being brought in through AMA connivance and allowed to practice medicine in America to meet the existing demand—the public be damned—so that no new medical schools that demographics would have filled with American kids are ever built.

    To follow your point to its conclusion, if the Chinese, Indians, and, for example, the Israelis are such scientific and techno geniuses, why do their successes in almost all cases derive from what they’ve stolen from us?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    said:
    "To follow your point to its conclusion, if the Chinese, Indians, and, for example, the Israelis are such scientific and techno geniuses, why do their successes in almost all cases derive from what they’ve stolen from us?"

    If Jews were really so smart they would have conjured up a better, more believable story than their impossibly fake & stupid '6,000,000 & gas chambers'.

    www.codoh.com
    , @Thomm

    why do their successes in almost all cases derive from what they’ve stolen from us?
     
    Don't say 'us'. You were not part of the community that produced those innovations.

    WN wiggers are not the same race as successful whites, but rather a defective subrace within whites. You have no more in common with us than a pygmy in the Congo has with Usain Bolt.

    Quit trying to take credit for something produced by people that you could not emulate in a million years.

    White Trashionalists have negro IQs.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. there are a bigger issues already here ,that wont let “this natural ” tendency predicted here.
    The elite must solve the debt issue,the astronomical and pharmaceutical cost (rip off levels),the usurer issue,the rent is to dam high issue,the student debt issue,etc etc etc that will take down the system long long long before any issue predicted here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  46. lavoisier says: • Website

    Regarding my home state of Arizona, that 66% figure is an interesting anomaly. Except for my fellow writers, most of the white folks I know are pretty conservative.

    Nothing conservative about electing that traitorous bastard McCain over and over again to the Senate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  47. @Seamus Padraig

    However, most Asian immigrants are not East Asians and their IQs (such as those of Indians or Pakistanis) are much lower.
     
    Really? How come so many are doctors, scientists and computer programmers? Those aren't typically low-IQ professions. Is this just a case of aggressive brain-drain? Do all the stupid ones stay behind in India?

    In homogenous societies, for example, politics tends to divide along class and cultural lines. As a society becomes more diverse, however, ethnicity begins to play a growing role.
     
    Yup. That's probably why the Democratic Party traded class war for race war.

    Really? How come so many are doctors, scientists and computer programmers? Those aren’t typically low-IQ professions. Is this just a case of aggressive brain-drain? Do all the stupid ones stay behind in India?

    Agree – this was the article’s sole fault. I’ve seen data suggesting that the children of East Indians may be out outperforming Jews. However, if you look at data from their home countries and certain other East Indian populations around the world (not sure if anyone has data from adoption studies), it’s clear East Indian success in the US/UK is due solely to highly selective immigration.

    I live and work in the Bay Area and know countless Indian uber-professionals (STEM PhDs, Stanford grads, Ivy League MBAs and on and on). The primary problem with every single one I’ve encountered is that they gulp down the SSSM-Cultural Marxist claptrap like a hungry dog eating spilled food. I was recently having a beer with an Indian Ivy League MBA and slipped into the conversation that low-skilled Latinos are under-performing, going on four generations. His reply was along the lines of “well, that’s why we need to invest more money into their schools and communities.” He’s my friend, so I buried the urge to slap him in the face.

    I’m not sure how US East Indians’ political leanings well evolve in the future. However, I’m worried that they will become the new Jews – taking on all the worst qualities of the 80% of US Jews that lean just to the left of Marx.

    In the future, East Indians may be useful in quelling some of the racial resentment brewing in the Brown underclass. Over the next few decades, we’ll see East Indians (and half-White EA – I know a few Indian-White uber-professional couples with kids) climb to the top. Will the Mestizos look at some of the dark brown faces inhabiting the mansions they service as menial workers and think “there are brown people like me at the top” or will they think these are the new Jews, responsible for [insert latest conspiracy theory].

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sin City Milla
    It won't change until pogroms begin against whites. Today's media reported sanctimoniously that several persons had been rightly fired from their jobs after it was discovered they had posted white nationalist messages online using pseudonyms. Whites are so brainwashed that they won't begin to wake up until the blood of friends n family is in the streets. Rivers of blood.
    , @rec1man
    Most Indians in USA, UK, tell their kids never bring home a black or a muslim

    Upper caste Indians in UK, USA , are more likely to marry a white than a lower caste Indian or a Indian Muslim or Indian Christian

    I ( Tamil-Brahmin ) have about 5 nieces and 2 nephews married to White Euro vs 2 nieces to Dravidians

    The preference order is Upper Caste Indian > White Euro > Lower Caste Indian > Anybody else > Black > Muslim

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. @Jim Christian

    This ethnocentrism is instinctual, observable even among babies. Whites are not immune from its effects. Most are socialized to suppress their ethnocentric instincts, but they remain only a short distance beneath the surface.
     
    Even the most vile race-virtuosos' ethnocentric instincts boil to the surface in the flight to "good schools" for their children. The "Good schools" rationale works for them. Gets them away from the city, away from those awful Blacks. It was always diversity for thee. The closest most liberals get to diversity is the Hispanic housekeeper. Because the Blacks, you know, they steal the liquor/silver/Waterford". Heard variations of this a million times..

    Actually, the “I’m colorblind” strategy is amazingly effective for white libs and cucks. It allows them to be as race realist as they want and to accuse anyone who calls them on it to be the real racist. (Btw, I don’t consider the term “racist” to be an insult, but they do.)

    If you point out that they live in 90% white area, they just say that they were looking for a nice area with good schools. It could just as easily have black or Hispanic. In fact, they never noticed the color of the people living here. Why would YOU ask such a question? Did YOU look at the demographics of the area before you moved here?

    If you mention that, no, the area could not just as easily have been black or Hispanic because there are no nice areas with good schools that heavily black or Hispanic, well, that just proves how racist you are noticing such things.

    Believe me, I’ve been in that situation several times. People – and, especially, women – do not appreciate your pointing out their hypocrisy. If you want to bring a neighborhood party to a screeching halt, mention how your non-racist neighbors live in an overwhelmingly white suburb and send their kids to overwhelmingly white schools.

    That being said, I am seeing more and more whites starting to be more open about identity politics. They haven’t yet reached the point where they indentify themselves as a member of a tribe, but they are noticing that everyone else seems to see themselves as first a member of their tribe and second as a member of this society.

    Baby steps.

    Read More
    • Replies: @artichoke
    So maybe (very likely) they're race realist, but they know it's hazardous to talk about such things openly. When you try to put them on the record, they know how to blunt your question.

    Why do you blame them? What do you want from them? Are they actively harming you? But they may be trapped, because all the candidates, D and R (and no other candidate matters because they can't win and, even if they do, they'll have to caucus with D or R) are open borders.

    If you're seeing a little more openness now, maybe it's because they, like you, see a chance to make a difference.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. @Wally
    Watch 'Latino' TV and what do you see?

    Almost all Euro-whites, very few Indians, very few mestizos.

    Have a look at the Mexican Congress, almost all euro-white.

    https://www.vosizneias.com/assets/uploads/news_photos/thumbnails/600_velbbsqa1abaemdvdohe1pwyilzloavq.jpg

    Outgoing Enrique Peña Nieto looks like a businessman from Madrid. I doubt he has any Indio blood. Same throughout all of Latin America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Prester John
    Indeed. These countries have a caste system that seems to be every bit the equal of India's.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. Wally says:
    @DanFromCT
    Why are there so many Paki and Indian docs running around? You’re kidding, right? if you don’t realize it’s to enhance the dollar value of an American medical education by artificially restricting supply, in turn primarily benefitting another group whose intellectual superiority is also smoke and mirrors concealing unmerited preferment of biblical proportions.

    In India, unless I’m mistaken and but for a small handful of elite medical schools, the education is about that of a nurse over here—except that over there not only are “seats” for sale, but so are grades, and the heaviest work is prepping for the states’ physician licensing exams over here. It appears these people are being brought in through AMA connivance and allowed to practice medicine in America to meet the existing demand—the public be damned—so that no new medical schools that demographics would have filled with American kids are ever built.

    To follow your point to its conclusion, if the Chinese, Indians, and, for example, the Israelis are such scientific and techno geniuses, why do their successes in almost all cases derive from what they’ve stolen from us?

    said:
    “To follow your point to its conclusion, if the Chinese, Indians, and, for example, the Israelis are such scientific and techno geniuses, why do their successes in almost all cases derive from what they’ve stolen from us?”

    If Jews were really so smart they would have conjured up a better, more believable story than their impossibly fake & stupid ’6,000,000 & gas chambers’.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. Wally says:
    @Jim Christian

    This ethnocentrism is instinctual, observable even among babies. Whites are not immune from its effects. Most are socialized to suppress their ethnocentric instincts, but they remain only a short distance beneath the surface.
     
    Even the most vile race-virtuosos' ethnocentric instincts boil to the surface in the flight to "good schools" for their children. The "Good schools" rationale works for them. Gets them away from the city, away from those awful Blacks. It was always diversity for thee. The closest most liberals get to diversity is the Hispanic housekeeper. Because the Blacks, you know, they steal the liquor/silver/Waterford". Heard variations of this a million times..

    In every instance where blacks & browns are in great numbers, and / or control the governments of cities, counties, regions, states, countries, & continents we see:
    massive murder rates
    massive crime in general
    degraded property
    massive disease, especially STDs
    massive drug & alcohol abuse
    general filth, squalor
    massive birthrates
    inability / unwillingness to support their own children
    massive youth pregnancies rates
    massive school dropout rates
    incredibly low IQs & test scores
    violence as a way of life
    fathers nowhere to be found

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. Good article, though it begs a question: Why do we still have–Or need!–a two party system? The system flourished for a little over 130 years before it started to fray at the edges beginning in 1968. Fifty years later it appears to be blowing apart. If “diversity” is here to stay, then what purpose is served by having two parties whose individual members appear to be at each others throats and whose “platforms” often border upon incoherence. Perhaps the time has come to bury the two-party system once and for all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Great point. A multi-racial society needs multiple parties. Why should blacks and Hispanics share the same party? Sure, they both want to get as much of income from whites as possible, but other than that, they have almost nothing in common. Each should have its own party.

    The two-party system was yet another vestige (benefit?) of a homogeneous society. The days of parties being based first and foremost on ideas are rapidly fading.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. res says:

    The paper linked in this excerpt:

    More recently, 64 percent of all civil wars since 1946 have divided along ethnic lines.

    is based on two very interesting datasets which I think are worth calling out in case anyone wants to use them directly.

    http://ucdp.uu.se/downloads/

    UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset version 18.1 (they actually use a different version, but this looks like the most complete and recent)

    A conflict-year dataset with information on armed conflict where at least one party is the government of a state in the time period 1946-2017.

    To give an idea of what it contains, here is a portion of the content for the first two years of the Korean War showing the intervention of the UN, China, and USSR:

    conflict_id location side_a side_a_id side_a_2nd side_b side_b_id side_b_2nd incompatibility territory_name year intensity_level cumulative_intensity
    235 North Korea, South Korea Government of North Korea 138 Government of South Korea 139 1 Korea 1949 1 0
    235 North Korea, South Korea Government of North Korea 138 [Government of China, Government of Russia (Soviet Union)] Government of South Korea 139 [Government of Australia, Government of Canada, Government of France, Government of Greece, Government of New Zealand, Government of Philippines, Government of South Africa, Government of Thailand, Government of Turkey, Government of United Kingdom, Government of United States of America] 1 Korea 1950 2 1

    And:

    http://www.columbia.edu/~aw2951/Datasets.html

    ETHNIC POWER RELATIONS DATA SET, Version 3 (1946-2010)

    Ethnic Power Relations (EPR) Version 3 identifies all politically relevant ethnic groups and their access to state power in every country of the world from 1946 to 2010. It includes annual data on almost 800 groups and codes the degree to which their representatives hold executive-level state power — from total control of the government to overt political discrimination.

    To give an idea of what it contains, here is a portion of the content for the USA. I find it an interesting take. The primary weakness I see is that they don’t track changing ethnic composition (which is important!).

    statename relevance from to group size status
    United States of America Yes 1946 1965 Whites 0.691 MONOPOLY
    United States of America Yes 1946 1965 Latinos 0.125 IRRELEVANT
    United States of America Yes 1946 1965 African Americans 0.121 DISCRIMINATED
    United States of America Yes 1946 1965 Asian Americans 0.036 IRRELEVANT
    United States of America Yes 1946 1965 American Indians 0.0078 IRRELEVANT
    United States of America Yes 1946 1965 Arab Americans 0.0042 IRRELEVANT
    United States of America Yes 1966 2008 Whites 0.691 DOMINANT
    United States of America Yes 1966 2008 Latinos 0.125 POWERLESS
    United States of America Yes 1966 2008 African Americans 0.124 POWERLESS
    United States of America Yes 1966 2008 Asian Americans 0.036 POWERLESS
    United States of America Yes 1966 2008 American Indians 0.0078 POWERLESS
    United States of America Yes 1966 2008 Arab Americans 0.0042 POWERLESS
    United States of America Yes 2009 2010 Whites 0.691 SENIOR PARTNER
    United States of America Yes 2009 2010 Latinos 0.125 POWERLESS
    United States of America Yes 2009 2010 African Americans 0.124 JUNIOR PARTNER
    United States of America Yes 2009 2010 Asian Americans 0.036 POWERLESS
    United States of America Yes 2009 2010 American Indians 0.0078 POWERLESS
    United States of America Yes 2009 2010 Arab Americans 0.0042 POWERLESS

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  54. @Anonymous Jew
    Outgoing Enrique Peña Nieto looks like a businessman from Madrid. I doubt he has any Indio blood. Same throughout all of Latin America.

    Indeed. These countries have a caste system that seems to be every bit the equal of India’s.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. @jeppo
    Ocasio's victory is a nightmare for the Democrats. The Leftist media is touting her as the future of the party, but her platform makes Obama look like a rightwing extremist.

    - Federal Jobs Guarantee
    - Medicare for All
    - Tuition-free public college
    - Reduce prisons by 50%
    - Defund ICE

    But the real poison pill is her unwavering support for the Palestinians. I'm not making a value judgment on this or any other of her policies, but if the GOP can tag the next Democratic presidential candidate with Ocasio's worldview, then expect a Trumpslide in 2020.

    What do the (((brains))) and (((primary funders))) behind the Democratic party think of this rising star? Here are some choice quotes from NY Jewish Week:

    To some, the stunning victory of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, an outspoken critic of Israel, over 10-term Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-Queens-Bronx), an Israel supporter, in Tuesday’s Democratic primary is seen as another nail in the coffin of Democratic support for the Jewish state.

    “If she maintains her anti-Israel stance, she will be a one-term wonder,” predicted George Arzt, a New York political operative. “I don’t think you can have someone with those views in New York City. If she moderates, she could win again. If she doesn’t, there will be massive opposition to her — maybe even a cross-over candidate from the Latino community with pro-Israel views.”

    Hank Sheinkopf, a veteran Democratic strategist, said he sees Ocasio-Cortez’s overwhelming victory — she won with 57.5 percent of the vote — as “another step in the ongoing divorce proceedings between the pro-Israel community and the Democratic Party.”

    Jeff Wiesenfeld, a former aide to both Republican and Democratic elected officials, said he read Ocasio-Cortez’s Twitter and Facebook postings and said she has voiced opinions that are “downright hostile to Israel.”

    After 60 Palestinians were killed by the Israeli military in May while attempting to breach the fence along the Israel-Gaza border, Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter: “This is a massacre. I hope my peers have the moral courage to call it such. No state or entity is absolved of mass shootings of protestors. There is no justification. Palestinian people deserve basic human dignity, as anyone else. Democrats can’t be silent about this anymore.”

    “We have never stepped into a situation in New York City in which a member of Congress starts out hostile to us,” he added. “This is a new frontier.”

    “While Jewish Democrats support much of Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s domestic policy agenda, we disagree with her past statement regarding Israel, as well as her affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of America, which supports the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement targeting Israel,” it added. “In the coming days and months, we hope to learn more about Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s views, but at the moment, her position on Israel is not in line with our values.”

    http://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/ocasio-cortezs-israel-views-seen-as-troubling/

    What will Jewish Democrats do if the Ocasio/DSA platform becomes mainstream in the Democratic party? Join up with the anti-Trump neocons and vote for a third party? While the Republicans can win nationwide elections without Jewish money and votes, there's no evidence that the Democrats can, at least not yet.

    Another factor in Ocasio's surprise victory, as so delicately pointed out by the noted political analyst Andrew Anglin, is that:

    "Furthermore, people want to f*ck her."

    No shit. Her good looks and likeable personality mean that she's likely in the media spotlight to stay, no matter how much the MSM (((gatekeepers))) might want to shield the general public from her, ahem, "problematic" views.

    As an aside, I believe her nationwide appeal is enhanced by her complete lack of the godawful, ear-grating Nuyorican accent so commonplace among her co-ethnics. In fact she speaks with a general American accent with barely even a hint of New Yorkese. I don't know if this is part of a generalized homogenization of regional accents throughout the country, or if she affects this dialect for personal and/or political reasons. Either way, it only adds to her appeal.

    If the Ocasio-Sanders wing of the Dems continues its electoral ascendancy, then Donald Trump will start looking more and more like the moderate adult in the room compared to the infantile, gibsmedat, tantrum-throwers on the far left. Which is terrible news for the Clintonite, corporate bloodsucker wing of the Dems, but fantastic news for the rest of us.

    See my little contribution about a proposed multi-party system. If this woman catches on, then the Democrat Party as we know it is toast. And as to the Republican Party, McConnell is right–it is indeed the Party of Trump. If so, then where does he, Lindsay Graham, Bill Kristol and his Weekly Standard etal. go?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. @jilles dykstra
    Holland and the Netherlands that emerged out of 17th century Holland stand for freedom of expression.
    That we discriminated catholics say until 1960 is not even well realised in our country.
    However, some in the (former ?) catholic part, south of the rivers, still feel second rate citizens.
    Another word for discrimination is keeping a culture intact.

    The enormous present day stupidity is focussing on a thing like slavery.
    As if slavery was a white invention.
    That all inventions that brought progress are by white man, steam engine, combustion engines, electricity, anti biotics, vaccins, railways, steamboats, airplanes, synthetic fertilizers, clean water systems, seems to be forgotten.

    That we discriminated catholics say until 1960 is not even well realised in our country.
    However, some in the (former ?) catholic part, south of the rivers, still feel second rate citizens.

    Several years back, I was talking to a young guy from Amsterdam and I mentioned that I had recently been to Maastricht. ‘Oh, Limburg!’ he said. ‘We ought to give that place to the Belgians.’

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. @unpc downunder
    This article makes sense in terms of demographic trends, but doesn't factor in the interests of American elites. I'd imagine your typical wealthy white American (socially liberal but economically conservative) would be pretty uncomfortable with a Democrat Party that's totally dominated by NAMs and a Republican Party that focuses on white proles. A full-blown NAM Democrat Party is more likely to promote economic socialism, instead of Clinton-style neoliberalism, and a populist Republican Party is more likely to advocate for explicitly nationalist measures like staunch protectionism and hard line immigration policies.

    Hence, American elites have an interest in making sure the Democrats gain a certain percentage of white voters, and making sure the Republicans don't completely capture the white prole vote.

    Very astute analysis of US politics for a foreigner.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. @Prester John
    Good article, though it begs a question: Why do we still have--Or need!--a two party system? The system flourished for a little over 130 years before it started to fray at the edges beginning in 1968. Fifty years later it appears to be blowing apart. If "diversity" is here to stay, then what purpose is served by having two parties whose individual members appear to be at each others throats and whose "platforms" often border upon incoherence. Perhaps the time has come to bury the two-party system once and for all.

    Great point. A multi-racial society needs multiple parties. Why should blacks and Hispanics share the same party? Sure, they both want to get as much of income from whites as possible, but other than that, they have almost nothing in common. Each should have its own party.

    The two-party system was yet another vestige (benefit?) of a homogeneous society. The days of parties being based first and foremost on ideas are rapidly fading.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. JimB says:

    NY-14 just voted out the number four senior Democrat in the U.S. Congress. Had Crowley continued in office, he likely would have become a house speaker sometime within the next decade. House speakers can kick back a lot of favors to their district. As a very junior member, spokes model Ocasio-Ortez will spend a lot of time mugging in front of cameras shouting idiotic anti-white socialist slogans while accomplishing nothing for NY-14.

    Oh, well. I guess people get the congress-thing they deserve.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  60. @jeppo
    Ocasio's victory is a nightmare for the Democrats. The Leftist media is touting her as the future of the party, but her platform makes Obama look like a rightwing extremist.

    - Federal Jobs Guarantee
    - Medicare for All
    - Tuition-free public college
    - Reduce prisons by 50%
    - Defund ICE

    But the real poison pill is her unwavering support for the Palestinians. I'm not making a value judgment on this or any other of her policies, but if the GOP can tag the next Democratic presidential candidate with Ocasio's worldview, then expect a Trumpslide in 2020.

    What do the (((brains))) and (((primary funders))) behind the Democratic party think of this rising star? Here are some choice quotes from NY Jewish Week:

    To some, the stunning victory of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, an outspoken critic of Israel, over 10-term Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-Queens-Bronx), an Israel supporter, in Tuesday’s Democratic primary is seen as another nail in the coffin of Democratic support for the Jewish state.

    “If she maintains her anti-Israel stance, she will be a one-term wonder,” predicted George Arzt, a New York political operative. “I don’t think you can have someone with those views in New York City. If she moderates, she could win again. If she doesn’t, there will be massive opposition to her — maybe even a cross-over candidate from the Latino community with pro-Israel views.”

    Hank Sheinkopf, a veteran Democratic strategist, said he sees Ocasio-Cortez’s overwhelming victory — she won with 57.5 percent of the vote — as “another step in the ongoing divorce proceedings between the pro-Israel community and the Democratic Party.”

    Jeff Wiesenfeld, a former aide to both Republican and Democratic elected officials, said he read Ocasio-Cortez’s Twitter and Facebook postings and said she has voiced opinions that are “downright hostile to Israel.”

    After 60 Palestinians were killed by the Israeli military in May while attempting to breach the fence along the Israel-Gaza border, Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter: “This is a massacre. I hope my peers have the moral courage to call it such. No state or entity is absolved of mass shootings of protestors. There is no justification. Palestinian people deserve basic human dignity, as anyone else. Democrats can’t be silent about this anymore.”

    “We have never stepped into a situation in New York City in which a member of Congress starts out hostile to us,” he added. “This is a new frontier.”

    “While Jewish Democrats support much of Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s domestic policy agenda, we disagree with her past statement regarding Israel, as well as her affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of America, which supports the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement targeting Israel,” it added. “In the coming days and months, we hope to learn more about Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s views, but at the moment, her position on Israel is not in line with our values.”

    http://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/ocasio-cortezs-israel-views-seen-as-troubling/

    What will Jewish Democrats do if the Ocasio/DSA platform becomes mainstream in the Democratic party? Join up with the anti-Trump neocons and vote for a third party? While the Republicans can win nationwide elections without Jewish money and votes, there's no evidence that the Democrats can, at least not yet.

    Another factor in Ocasio's surprise victory, as so delicately pointed out by the noted political analyst Andrew Anglin, is that:

    "Furthermore, people want to f*ck her."

    No shit. Her good looks and likeable personality mean that she's likely in the media spotlight to stay, no matter how much the MSM (((gatekeepers))) might want to shield the general public from her, ahem, "problematic" views.

    As an aside, I believe her nationwide appeal is enhanced by her complete lack of the godawful, ear-grating Nuyorican accent so commonplace among her co-ethnics. In fact she speaks with a general American accent with barely even a hint of New Yorkese. I don't know if this is part of a generalized homogenization of regional accents throughout the country, or if she affects this dialect for personal and/or political reasons. Either way, it only adds to her appeal.

    If the Ocasio-Sanders wing of the Dems continues its electoral ascendancy, then Donald Trump will start looking more and more like the moderate adult in the room compared to the infantile, gibsmedat, tantrum-throwers on the far left. Which is terrible news for the Clintonite, corporate bloodsucker wing of the Dems, but fantastic news for the rest of us.

    Whether she moderates her Israel views or not, this should be a wake-up call to Jews. Hispanics, blacks and Asians either see Jews as white or, if they do separate Jews from whites, see them as “the man” keeping them down even more than gentile whites.

    Non-whites have zero guilt about the WWII holocaust (let’s remember that history is chaulk full of holocausts so I refuse to captialize the one directed toward Jews and others in the early 1940s as the one and only). Jews can’t guilt non-whites into doing things.

    That being said, Jews will still control the money and organization of the Dem Party as well as the media. That’s a lot of power and likely will allow Jews to keep the anti-Israel views to a minimum.

    However, it’s one thing to control a party of people who look like you, who generally like you, whom you can guilt on a moment’s notice and who – generally – genuinely support Israel. It’s a whole other ball game to barely keep the lid of a party of people who don’t look like you, who generally don’t like you, whom you can’t guilt and who genuinely don’t support Israel. The latter is a slave/master relationship and that only last as long as you have the whip and the dog. The minute those slaves think that they can kill you, they will.

    For Jewish elites, the demographic transformation of the United States (and Europe, for that matter) is hitting the point of deminishing returns and, in my opinion, actually starting to become “bad for the Jews.”

    If Jewish leaders ever realize this, it’s be shocking how fast the media and academia starts supporting strict immigration control.

    Either way, it’s entirely possible that we may have seen “Peak Jew” in the West. Not saying that Jews won’t continue to wield huge amounts of power for a long time to come. I’m just suggesting that they won’t have the free reign that they had over the past 50 years.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    said:
    "Non-whites have zero guilt about the WWII holocaust (let’s remember that history is chaulk full of holocausts so I refuse to captialize the one directed toward Jews and others in the early 1940s as the one and only). Jews can’t guilt non-whites into doing things."

    There was no 'holocau$t' directed at Jews, and there is no proof to the contrary.

    said:
    "Either way, it’s entirely possible that we may have seen “Peak Jew” in the West."

    Indeed. especially since more and more people are awakening to the fake / fraudulent nature of the absurdly alleged '6,000,000 Jews'.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    Good comment. My guess is, once she’s inducted, she’ll “realize” her previous views on Israel were based on “misunderstandings”, etc. But even if she sticks to her principles here, she can still be safely neutralized. But yeah, eventually the US media will switch in mid-harangue to a Eurasia-East Asia war moment.
    , @Jeff Stryker
    Jewish influence-

    Porn as an empire is fading-Goldstein himself died homeless and remarked that "nobody buys porn any longer, its free on the internet"

    The MSM is a joke. The internet undermined it.

    Hollywood holds strong.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    Either way, it’s entirely possible that we may have seen “Peak Jew” in the West.
     
    Some countries, eg, Australia and Argentina, saw it decades ago.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. Corvinus says:

    “Steve Sailer later argued that Republicans would fare better by targeting white voters.”

    Speaking of him, he is what said about the matter. Did he NOTICE something?

    Furthermore, here are the trends that calls into question the author’s line of thinking.

    https://theintercept.com/2018/07/01/ocasio-cortez-data-suggests-that-gentrifying-neighborhoods-powered-alexandria-ocasio-cortezs-victory-over-the-democratic-establishment/

    Read More
    • Replies: @map
    Her district is 50% Hispanic.

    Of course they are going to vote for her Hispanic ass over the Irishman.
    , @map
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York%27s_14th_congressional_district

    Do some basic research.

    She is a pure identity politics vote.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    3) Young white turnout was off the charts and that helped her *a lot*
     
    What kind of white kids live in that part of the world, anyway? "Volunteers", i.e., slummers?

    There's also a bit of a sample size issue. Not the number of whites polled; the number of whites altogether. Who polls the black vote in Vermont and New Hampshire?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Wally says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Whether she moderates her Israel views or not, this should be a wake-up call to Jews. Hispanics, blacks and Asians either see Jews as white or, if they do separate Jews from whites, see them as "the man" keeping them down even more than gentile whites.

    Non-whites have zero guilt about the WWII holocaust (let's remember that history is chaulk full of holocausts so I refuse to captialize the one directed toward Jews and others in the early 1940s as the one and only). Jews can't guilt non-whites into doing things.

    That being said, Jews will still control the money and organization of the Dem Party as well as the media. That's a lot of power and likely will allow Jews to keep the anti-Israel views to a minimum.

    However, it's one thing to control a party of people who look like you, who generally like you, whom you can guilt on a moment's notice and who - generally - genuinely support Israel. It's a whole other ball game to barely keep the lid of a party of people who don't look like you, who generally don't like you, whom you can't guilt and who genuinely don't support Israel. The latter is a slave/master relationship and that only last as long as you have the whip and the dog. The minute those slaves think that they can kill you, they will.

    For Jewish elites, the demographic transformation of the United States (and Europe, for that matter) is hitting the point of deminishing returns and, in my opinion, actually starting to become "bad for the Jews."

    If Jewish leaders ever realize this, it's be shocking how fast the media and academia starts supporting strict immigration control.

    Either way, it's entirely possible that we may have seen "Peak Jew" in the West. Not saying that Jews won't continue to wield huge amounts of power for a long time to come. I'm just suggesting that they won't have the free reign that they had over the past 50 years.

    said:
    “Non-whites have zero guilt about the WWII holocaust (let’s remember that history is chaulk full of holocausts so I refuse to captialize the one directed toward Jews and others in the early 1940s as the one and only). Jews can’t guilt non-whites into doing things.”

    There was no ‘holocau$t’ directed at Jews, and there is no proof to the contrary.

    said:
    “Either way, it’s entirely possible that we may have seen “Peak Jew” in the West.”

    Indeed. especially since more and more people are awakening to the fake / fraudulent nature of the absurdly alleged ’6,000,000 Jews’.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. map says:
    @Corvinus
    "Steve Sailer later argued that Republicans would fare better by targeting white voters."

    Speaking of him, he is what said about the matter. Did he NOTICE something?

    https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1013689662517284865

    Furthermore, here are the trends that calls into question the author's line of thinking.

    https://twitter.com/davidshor/status/1013687094496190464

    https://theintercept.com/2018/07/01/ocasio-cortez-data-suggests-that-gentrifying-neighborhoods-powered-alexandria-ocasio-cortezs-victory-over-the-democratic-establishment/

    Her district is 50% Hispanic.

    Of course they are going to vote for her Hispanic ass over the Irishman.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    There's a reason I got a gold box, b----. Don't be raining on my parade. And those same Hispanics had voted for the Irishman until she ran. Why? A combination of her background, her agenda, and courting EVERYONE in her district regardless of race or ethnicity. Please NOTICE that a lot of young white people also voted for her.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. map says:
    @Corvinus
    "Steve Sailer later argued that Republicans would fare better by targeting white voters."

    Speaking of him, he is what said about the matter. Did he NOTICE something?

    https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1013689662517284865

    Furthermore, here are the trends that calls into question the author's line of thinking.

    https://twitter.com/davidshor/status/1013687094496190464

    https://theintercept.com/2018/07/01/ocasio-cortez-data-suggests-that-gentrifying-neighborhoods-powered-alexandria-ocasio-cortezs-victory-over-the-democratic-establishment/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York%27s_14th_congressional_district

    Do some basic research.

    She is a pure identity politics vote.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. The white Dems are so utterly stupid. They force open borders and massive third world immigration on an unwilling populace, only to have the angry third worlders replace them in the party. Cortez is a reflection of the fact that Dems are now openly anti-white. The DNC leaders are openly anti-white.
    Ellison hates white people. Waters hates white people.
    All of the black “pundits” (Blow, Lemon, etc) hate white people.

    Look at that dumb Gillibrand calling for abolishing ICE. The white Dems are now openly pro-non white, essentially anti-white.

    Crowley was whining like a little bitch, “I can’t help it I’m white! I’m one of the GOOD white people! I hate white people too!”

    Poetic justice for the slimy Democratic Party. The white Democrats deserve to be thrown under the bus. They sold us out LONG ago.

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier

    Poetic justice for the slimy Democratic Party. The white Democrats deserve to be thrown under the bus. They sold us out LONG ago.
     
    So true. Unfortunately a lot of the Republicans have sold out as well. That is why our nation is in trouble. Cowardly, stupid, venal elites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Won’t go gently into the night… that is some tough talk from a pen-jockey. Let’s see how it turns in a few years!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  67. The ethnic advance is correct. it’s just based on a trait that is not ethnic — skin color.

    What it really reflects if a population of international liberal bents, who believe as most foreigners who come to the country believe

    government should provide period.

    I bet I can guess which direction white women voted.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  68. Corvinus says:
    @map
    Her district is 50% Hispanic.

    Of course they are going to vote for her Hispanic ass over the Irishman.

    There’s a reason I got a gold box, b—-. Don’t be raining on my parade. And those same Hispanics had voted for the Irishman until she ran. Why? A combination of her background, her agenda, and courting EVERYONE in her district regardless of race or ethnicity. Please NOTICE that a lot of young white people also voted for her.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sunbeam
    "Please NOTICE that a lot of young white people also voted for her."

    I suspect that any battles fought over gentrification in her district will have the epicenter where those young, white people are located.

    It probably won't bite her in the ass though, she'll be in Congress and won't be around to get hit when the mud starts flying.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Bennis Mardens
    The white Dems are so utterly stupid. They force open borders and massive third world immigration on an unwilling populace, only to have the angry third worlders replace them in the party. Cortez is a reflection of the fact that Dems are now openly anti-white. The DNC leaders are openly anti-white.
    Ellison hates white people. Waters hates white people.
    All of the black "pundits" (Blow, Lemon, etc) hate white people.

    Look at that dumb Gillibrand calling for abolishing ICE. The white Dems are now openly pro-non white, essentially anti-white.

    Crowley was whining like a little bitch, "I can't help it I'm white! I'm one of the GOOD white people! I hate white people too!"

    Poetic justice for the slimy Democratic Party. The white Democrats deserve to be thrown under the bus. They sold us out LONG ago.

    Poetic justice for the slimy Democratic Party. The white Democrats deserve to be thrown under the bus. They sold us out LONG ago.

    So true. Unfortunately a lot of the Republicans have sold out as well. That is why our nation is in trouble. Cowardly, stupid, venal elites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Sunbeam says:
    @Corvinus
    There's a reason I got a gold box, b----. Don't be raining on my parade. And those same Hispanics had voted for the Irishman until she ran. Why? A combination of her background, her agenda, and courting EVERYONE in her district regardless of race or ethnicity. Please NOTICE that a lot of young white people also voted for her.

    “Please NOTICE that a lot of young white people also voted for her.”

    I suspect that any battles fought over gentrification in her district will have the epicenter where those young, white people are located.

    It probably won’t bite her in the ass though, she’ll be in Congress and won’t be around to get hit when the mud starts flying.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. Mulegino1 says:

    Liberal democracy’ s teleological end, insofar as it has been the chief instrument for the advancement of international Jewry’s corporate hegemony, is the destruction of the traditional society and culture of Christian Europa. Ironically, insofar as this end approaches its fulfillment, there will be a violent reaction from the forces of tradition and sanity, which serves to destroy the political system built upon it and to initiate new forms of government based upon men of action and not vacuous theory and unworkable and utopian creedal concepts of leveling equality, the abolition of traditional institutions and the enthronement of situational ethics and political correctness.

    The old liberal New Deal Democrats no longer exist; they are as extinct as the Taft Republicans. The faux “Liberal-Conservative” bifurcation needs to be swept out of the public consciousness as the absolute fiction it is.

    The mob of absolutely insane cultural Marxists radicals now forming on the left- aided and abetted by the usual suspects, their controlled press and their neocon warmongering pied pipers- will soon need Napoleon’s “whiff of grapeshot” in order for their dispersal and return to the shadows. We are not that far away from our own Reichstag fire, and a new Enabling Act to return power to the elected executive and away from these leftist and neo-leftist monsters and their subversive enablers in the kosher media.

    Read More
    • Agree: Svigor
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    As you can tell from my comments, I'm all for a move toward the Nationalist Right for whites. However, that being said, the examples of California and Texas point not toward increased white identity and a GOP (or some other party) representing whites, but to whites just insulating and isolating.

    But whites do seem to be waking up a bit recently. I've seen subtle, but noticeable, changes in many white people's attitude. There seems to be a realization by many whites that, yes, everyone else is playing the race/tribal game except whites and that non-whites aren't just going to give up their identity and become whites in dark face. Granted, these slowly awakening whites aren't quite sure what to do with new information. For now, they mostly just seem disappointed in non-whites not acting like whites.

    However, at some point, disappointment will turn to the realization that if everyone else is going to play that game, we need to play as well.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. @Mulegino1
    Liberal democracy' s teleological end, insofar as it has been the chief instrument for the advancement of international Jewry's corporate hegemony, is the destruction of the traditional society and culture of Christian Europa. Ironically, insofar as this end approaches its fulfillment, there will be a violent reaction from the forces of tradition and sanity, which serves to destroy the political system built upon it and to initiate new forms of government based upon men of action and not vacuous theory and unworkable and utopian creedal concepts of leveling equality, the abolition of traditional institutions and the enthronement of situational ethics and political correctness.

    The old liberal New Deal Democrats no longer exist; they are as extinct as the Taft Republicans. The faux "Liberal-Conservative" bifurcation needs to be swept out of the public consciousness as the absolute fiction it is.

    The mob of absolutely insane cultural Marxists radicals now forming on the left- aided and abetted by the usual suspects, their controlled press and their neocon warmongering pied pipers- will soon need Napoleon's "whiff of grapeshot" in order for their dispersal and return to the shadows. We are not that far away from our own Reichstag fire, and a new Enabling Act to return power to the elected executive and away from these leftist and neo-leftist monsters and their subversive enablers in the kosher media.

    As you can tell from my comments, I’m all for a move toward the Nationalist Right for whites. However, that being said, the examples of California and Texas point not toward increased white identity and a GOP (or some other party) representing whites, but to whites just insulating and isolating.

    But whites do seem to be waking up a bit recently. I’ve seen subtle, but noticeable, changes in many white people’s attitude. There seems to be a realization by many whites that, yes, everyone else is playing the race/tribal game except whites and that non-whites aren’t just going to give up their identity and become whites in dark face. Granted, these slowly awakening whites aren’t quite sure what to do with new information. For now, they mostly just seem disappointed in non-whites not acting like whites.

    However, at some point, disappointment will turn to the realization that if everyone else is going to play that game, we need to play as well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    For now, they mostly just seem disappointed in non-whites not acting like whites.
     
    I want to ask these people, especially the young, SJW ones, are you ashamed to be part of a race that invented "marriage equality" out of whole cloth?
    , @Mulegino1
    I agree. Christians of European provenance are awakening by the millions. Liberal democracy is a demographic disaster for the people- for all people- but mostly for our people. It is a Trojan Horse, a disastrously unworkable mix of the false leftist notion of leveling equality, the manufacture of a false pseudo-religion of the worship of quantity over quality (by extending the franchise to all, even the most abysmally unqualified) combined with the illusory liberal idea of unlimited societal and political progress, terminating in the madness of things like "gender fluidity" and trans-humanism. No authentic culture can withstand the ingestion of such toxic and anti-nature concepts.

    Liberal democracy must be smashed. America was conceived of as a constitutional confederation of republics for European Christians; a place for the dispossessed of historical Christendom to build a home, not as a dumping ground for Third World refuse, and even less so as the ultimate redoubt and headquarters of international Jewry.

    , @Corvinus
    "As you can tell from my comments, I’m all for a move toward the Nationalist Right for whites."

    That's fine and dandy, just realize that there will always be a significant portion of whites who will be in opposition.

    "But whites do seem to be waking up a bit recently. I’ve seen subtle, but noticeable, changes in many white people’s attitude."

    Some whites, assuredly.

    "Granted, these slowly awakening whites aren’t quite sure what to do with new information."

    Probably just take it with a grain of salt.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. Svigor says:

    Good article. Unz.com ate my longer replies several times yesterday.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  74. @Corvinus
    "Steve Sailer later argued that Republicans would fare better by targeting white voters."

    Speaking of him, he is what said about the matter. Did he NOTICE something?

    https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1013689662517284865

    Furthermore, here are the trends that calls into question the author's line of thinking.

    https://twitter.com/davidshor/status/1013687094496190464

    https://theintercept.com/2018/07/01/ocasio-cortez-data-suggests-that-gentrifying-neighborhoods-powered-alexandria-ocasio-cortezs-victory-over-the-democratic-establishment/

    3) Young white turnout was off the charts and that helped her *a lot*

    What kind of white kids live in that part of the world, anyway? “Volunteers”, i.e., slummers?

    There’s also a bit of a sample size issue. Not the number of whites polled; the number of whites altogether. Who polls the black vote in Vermont and New Hampshire?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    As you can tell from my comments, I'm all for a move toward the Nationalist Right for whites. However, that being said, the examples of California and Texas point not toward increased white identity and a GOP (or some other party) representing whites, but to whites just insulating and isolating.

    But whites do seem to be waking up a bit recently. I've seen subtle, but noticeable, changes in many white people's attitude. There seems to be a realization by many whites that, yes, everyone else is playing the race/tribal game except whites and that non-whites aren't just going to give up their identity and become whites in dark face. Granted, these slowly awakening whites aren't quite sure what to do with new information. For now, they mostly just seem disappointed in non-whites not acting like whites.

    However, at some point, disappointment will turn to the realization that if everyone else is going to play that game, we need to play as well.

    For now, they mostly just seem disappointed in non-whites not acting like whites.

    I want to ask these people, especially the young, SJW ones, are you ashamed to be part of a race that invented “marriage equality” out of whole cloth?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Whether she moderates her Israel views or not, this should be a wake-up call to Jews. Hispanics, blacks and Asians either see Jews as white or, if they do separate Jews from whites, see them as "the man" keeping them down even more than gentile whites.

    Non-whites have zero guilt about the WWII holocaust (let's remember that history is chaulk full of holocausts so I refuse to captialize the one directed toward Jews and others in the early 1940s as the one and only). Jews can't guilt non-whites into doing things.

    That being said, Jews will still control the money and organization of the Dem Party as well as the media. That's a lot of power and likely will allow Jews to keep the anti-Israel views to a minimum.

    However, it's one thing to control a party of people who look like you, who generally like you, whom you can guilt on a moment's notice and who - generally - genuinely support Israel. It's a whole other ball game to barely keep the lid of a party of people who don't look like you, who generally don't like you, whom you can't guilt and who genuinely don't support Israel. The latter is a slave/master relationship and that only last as long as you have the whip and the dog. The minute those slaves think that they can kill you, they will.

    For Jewish elites, the demographic transformation of the United States (and Europe, for that matter) is hitting the point of deminishing returns and, in my opinion, actually starting to become "bad for the Jews."

    If Jewish leaders ever realize this, it's be shocking how fast the media and academia starts supporting strict immigration control.

    Either way, it's entirely possible that we may have seen "Peak Jew" in the West. Not saying that Jews won't continue to wield huge amounts of power for a long time to come. I'm just suggesting that they won't have the free reign that they had over the past 50 years.

    Good comment. My guess is, once she’s inducted, she’ll “realize” her previous views on Israel were based on “misunderstandings”, etc. But even if she sticks to her principles here, she can still be safely neutralized. But yeah, eventually the US media will switch in mid-harangue to a Eurasia-East Asia war moment.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. Mulegino1 says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    As you can tell from my comments, I'm all for a move toward the Nationalist Right for whites. However, that being said, the examples of California and Texas point not toward increased white identity and a GOP (or some other party) representing whites, but to whites just insulating and isolating.

    But whites do seem to be waking up a bit recently. I've seen subtle, but noticeable, changes in many white people's attitude. There seems to be a realization by many whites that, yes, everyone else is playing the race/tribal game except whites and that non-whites aren't just going to give up their identity and become whites in dark face. Granted, these slowly awakening whites aren't quite sure what to do with new information. For now, they mostly just seem disappointed in non-whites not acting like whites.

    However, at some point, disappointment will turn to the realization that if everyone else is going to play that game, we need to play as well.

    I agree. Christians of European provenance are awakening by the millions. Liberal democracy is a demographic disaster for the people- for all people- but mostly for our people. It is a Trojan Horse, a disastrously unworkable mix of the false leftist notion of leveling equality, the manufacture of a false pseudo-religion of the worship of quantity over quality (by extending the franchise to all, even the most abysmally unqualified) combined with the illusory liberal idea of unlimited societal and political progress, terminating in the madness of things like “gender fluidity” and trans-humanism. No authentic culture can withstand the ingestion of such toxic and anti-nature concepts.

    Liberal democracy must be smashed. America was conceived of as a constitutional confederation of republics for European Christians; a place for the dispossessed of historical Christendom to build a home, not as a dumping ground for Third World refuse, and even less so as the ultimate redoubt and headquarters of international Jewry.

    Read More
    • Agree: Them Guys
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. Thomm says:
    @DanFromCT
    Why are there so many Paki and Indian docs running around? You’re kidding, right? if you don’t realize it’s to enhance the dollar value of an American medical education by artificially restricting supply, in turn primarily benefitting another group whose intellectual superiority is also smoke and mirrors concealing unmerited preferment of biblical proportions.

    In India, unless I’m mistaken and but for a small handful of elite medical schools, the education is about that of a nurse over here—except that over there not only are “seats” for sale, but so are grades, and the heaviest work is prepping for the states’ physician licensing exams over here. It appears these people are being brought in through AMA connivance and allowed to practice medicine in America to meet the existing demand—the public be damned—so that no new medical schools that demographics would have filled with American kids are ever built.

    To follow your point to its conclusion, if the Chinese, Indians, and, for example, the Israelis are such scientific and techno geniuses, why do their successes in almost all cases derive from what they’ve stolen from us?

    why do their successes in almost all cases derive from what they’ve stolen from us?

    Don’t say ‘us’. You were not part of the community that produced those innovations.

    WN wiggers are not the same race as successful whites, but rather a defective subrace within whites. You have no more in common with us than a pygmy in the Congo has with Usain Bolt.

    Quit trying to take credit for something produced by people that you could not emulate in a million years.

    White Trashionalists have negro IQs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    WN wiggers are not the same race as successful whites, but rather a defective subrace within whites
     
    .

    Yeah, "WN wiggers" like Samuel FB Morse and Henry Ford never invented anything. All the credit goes to those "credit-to-their-race" whites with rainbow flags flying from their mainline churches.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. schrub says:

    The author of this article mentions the split between northern and southern Brazil along racial laws.

    What happens when people simply start to increasingly reject Brazil’s racial polarization?

    You will end up with more places like Blumenau, where the blonde, blue-eyed girl residents wear dirndls and the blonde, blue-eyed boys wear lederhosen and both speak German along with Portuguese,

    It is also, being very German, one of the most prosperous areas in Brazil (along with also being almost 95% white). Interestingly, their city also has the distinction of having the second largest Octoberfest celebration in the entire world after Munich, Germany.

    Needless to say, the bureaucrats up in the capital Brasilia are not amused by this parochialism.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blumenau

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    BAD BEGINNINGS-

    There are a good number of pure white Portuguese in poverty-they are descended from the vagrants, drunks and prostitutes deported from Lisbon.

    But the real poor are the mixture of African and Brazilian Native American.

    German families who immigrated to South Brazil as families and capital underscore the insane K strategy reproductive poverty of Indians and blacks.

    Basically single black women in poverty in Brazil are given cocaine or booze and impregnated every year until there is a huge number of impoverished street kids-6 to a woman who cannot afford to pay for any of them.

    This become like cats in a dumpster.

    US blacks are not quite so out-of-control. But they begin having kids out-of-wedlock as teens and continue until 40 and have 3-4 kids with no fathers.

    Black men, whose balls are always charged to put more of a burden on the welfare system, will begin having children at 17 and often father 5 kids.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. @Anonymous Jew

    Really? How come so many are doctors, scientists and computer programmers? Those aren’t typically low-IQ professions. Is this just a case of aggressive brain-drain? Do all the stupid ones stay behind in India?
     
    Agree - this was the article's sole fault. I've seen data suggesting that the children of East Indians may be out outperforming Jews. However, if you look at data from their home countries and certain other East Indian populations around the world (not sure if anyone has data from adoption studies), it's clear East Indian success in the US/UK is due solely to highly selective immigration.

    I live and work in the Bay Area and know countless Indian uber-professionals (STEM PhDs, Stanford grads, Ivy League MBAs and on and on). The primary problem with every single one I've encountered is that they gulp down the SSSM-Cultural Marxist claptrap like a hungry dog eating spilled food. I was recently having a beer with an Indian Ivy League MBA and slipped into the conversation that low-skilled Latinos are under-performing, going on four generations. His reply was along the lines of "well, that's why we need to invest more money into their schools and communities." He's my friend, so I buried the urge to slap him in the face.

    I'm not sure how US East Indians' political leanings well evolve in the future. However, I'm worried that they will become the new Jews - taking on all the worst qualities of the 80% of US Jews that lean just to the left of Marx.

    In the future, East Indians may be useful in quelling some of the racial resentment brewing in the Brown underclass. Over the next few decades, we'll see East Indians (and half-White EA - I know a few Indian-White uber-professional couples with kids) climb to the top. Will the Mestizos look at some of the dark brown faces inhabiting the mansions they service as menial workers and think "there are brown people like me at the top" or will they think these are the new Jews, responsible for [insert latest conspiracy theory].

    It won’t change until pogroms begin against whites. Today’s media reported sanctimoniously that several persons had been rightly fired from their jobs after it was discovered they had posted white nationalist messages online using pseudonyms. Whites are so brainwashed that they won’t begin to wake up until the blood of friends n family is in the streets. Rivers of blood.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. Jeff77450 says:

    The Republican Party hasn’t done a very good job of explaining *why* someone should vote for them. Historically the message of the Democrats has been vote for us and you’ll see an *immediate* tangible benefit, e.g. a new entitlement or affirmative-action policy. Conversely, the benefits that Republican’s have historically promised are more abstract. America as a whole benefits from a strong defense, law & order, reduced government spending, low interest rates, minimal regulation, etc., but I can understand why people on the left side of the bell curve have difficulty grasping how they benefit from these things in the here & now. Indeed, they might not benefit in the immediate sense and trying to get them to understand that years from now their children & grandchildren will benefit is “a bridge too far” for many of them. Reward now versus larger reward later.

    Of course, for the past twenty-odd years Republicans seem to have abandoned all pretense of caring about the budget deficits and the national debt.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  82. Its funny people still believe theres a difference between Republicans, Conservatives, Democrats, Liberals…..
    They all serve the same masters. Same agenda.
    The only job of establishment politicians is to keep the slaves distracted and fighting each other while they and their masters loot the slaves and the nation. That is all.
    You’re all niggers and mexicans to them, whether you’re white black or brown. They see you all as equals, as slaves.
    Besides everyone should know by now that politicians have no real power, the real shot callers don’t hold elections.
    I would consider voting for the cortez girl just as fast as any “republican” she is at least calling out the real problem, Wall St., The MIC, Israel
    Keep fighting amongst yourselves though, we’ve been fighting with each other since at least the 60′s and it hasn’t solved anything.
    What really keeps “them” up at night is the “left” and the “right” coming together, getting together to squash them. Why do you think they try so hard to divide you?
    All the Antifa fights you see on tv is all scripted CIA/Mossad chaos, just like they do in foreign countries, like Iran or Venezuala, don’t fall for it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @artichoke
    Wall St., The MIC, Israel: maybe they're problems, but they're also sources of much US wealth and influence. Ms. Ocasio-Cortez has not the slightest idea what she would put in their place, because she's a (giving the benefit of the doubt here) moderately good recent grad from a moderately good university. A young woman with no idea what she's talking about.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. Escher says:

    Since 1992, the white share of the Democratic presidential vote has dropped an average of about one percent per year. At its current rate, it could tip to majority-minority status by 2020. It will occur no later than 2024.

    Probably long before, at least in the lower socioeconomic segments, older millennials, Gen-X and older people, who are affected by immigration where it hurts, in the pocket. I have encountered many dyed in the wool liberals making subtle remarks about how their workplace and/or neighborhood is changing so much that they feel like strangers.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Iberiano
    It is interesting to watch all the #Walkaway videos, particularly of Gen-Xers like myself, because regardless of the (white) person's background (gay, straight, feminist, weirdo, whatever), they are basically coding what the real issue is: Race. Someone can make a 15 minute video tip toeing around it, but they basically are doing the political version of "we just wanted better schools". A few have overtly said they did not like all the race baiting--which is a bit of a pink pill, but I suspect many feel stronger than what they are saying. They are, rightly, seeing the dems as the party of the 3rd world types.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. the BIG donut hole in this article is about CLASS, LABOR status which determines INCOME inequalities among ALL voters in BOTH parties and other lesser known parties. It would be crucial to analyze voting patterns across INCOME levels, labor status (blue,white collar) and then find the intersectional points among race,class, labor, income and VOTING patterns that’s the electoral KEY compass. The side issues are which party will collapse/split fisrt, the BInomial bipolar party system may come to an end. And lets remember the shadow forces of the glaring defects of the American USA Voting system…less than 40% of elegible citizens vote in Presidential elections and much much less in local state races….and the corrupt, illegal, mafia like control over state, local elections…(DNC fraud favoring HClinton over BSanders), which is becoming a business as usual en DEM control cities and states…why are dem/blue states refusing to open the voting rolls to FECommission???? the risk of institutional irrelevancy of voting??? In Los Angeles CA a School Board Member (selected.finance with the teachers Unions mega capital$$$) won his race with less than 300 votes in a city with 5miilion residents??????.

    Read More
    • Replies: @artichoke
    Why assume low voter turnout is a problem? If someone doesn't care, why should they vote? I'd rather that they didn't, and the winner was determined by those motivated enough to vote. Or in some places, voting doesn't matter. Here in NY, it makes no difference whom I vote for, for President or Senator. Dems win all those, all the time. (Not Governor though.)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. artichoke says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Actually, the "I'm colorblind" strategy is amazingly effective for white libs and cucks. It allows them to be as race realist as they want and to accuse anyone who calls them on it to be the real racist. (Btw, I don't consider the term "racist" to be an insult, but they do.)

    If you point out that they live in 90% white area, they just say that they were looking for a nice area with good schools. It could just as easily have black or Hispanic. In fact, they never noticed the color of the people living here. Why would YOU ask such a question? Did YOU look at the demographics of the area before you moved here?

    If you mention that, no, the area could not just as easily have been black or Hispanic because there are no nice areas with good schools that heavily black or Hispanic, well, that just proves how racist you are noticing such things.

    Believe me, I've been in that situation several times. People - and, especially, women - do not appreciate your pointing out their hypocrisy. If you want to bring a neighborhood party to a screeching halt, mention how your non-racist neighbors live in an overwhelmingly white suburb and send their kids to overwhelmingly white schools.

    That being said, I am seeing more and more whites starting to be more open about identity politics. They haven't yet reached the point where they indentify themselves as a member of a tribe, but they are noticing that everyone else seems to see themselves as first a member of their tribe and second as a member of this society.

    Baby steps.

    So maybe (very likely) they’re race realist, but they know it’s hazardous to talk about such things openly. When you try to put them on the record, they know how to blunt your question.

    Why do you blame them? What do you want from them? Are they actively harming you? But they may be trapped, because all the candidates, D and R (and no other candidate matters because they can’t win and, even if they do, they’ll have to caucus with D or R) are open borders.

    If you’re seeing a little more openness now, maybe it’s because they, like you, see a chance to make a difference.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. artichoke says:
    @redmudhooch
    Its funny people still believe theres a difference between Republicans, Conservatives, Democrats, Liberals.....
    They all serve the same masters. Same agenda.
    The only job of establishment politicians is to keep the slaves distracted and fighting each other while they and their masters loot the slaves and the nation. That is all.
    You're all niggers and mexicans to them, whether you're white black or brown. They see you all as equals, as slaves.
    Besides everyone should know by now that politicians have no real power, the real shot callers don't hold elections.
    I would consider voting for the cortez girl just as fast as any "republican" she is at least calling out the real problem, Wall St., The MIC, Israel
    Keep fighting amongst yourselves though, we've been fighting with each other since at least the 60's and it hasn't solved anything.
    What really keeps "them" up at night is the "left" and the "right" coming together, getting together to squash them. Why do you think they try so hard to divide you?
    All the Antifa fights you see on tv is all scripted CIA/Mossad chaos, just like they do in foreign countries, like Iran or Venezuala, don't fall for it.

    Wall St., The MIC, Israel: maybe they’re problems, but they’re also sources of much US wealth and influence. Ms. Ocasio-Cortez has not the slightest idea what she would put in their place, because she’s a (giving the benefit of the doubt here) moderately good recent grad from a moderately good university. A young woman with no idea what she’s talking about.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. artichoke says:
    @Peter Tazumal
    the BIG donut hole in this article is about CLASS, LABOR status which determines INCOME inequalities among ALL voters in BOTH parties and other lesser known parties. It would be crucial to analyze voting patterns across INCOME levels, labor status (blue,white collar) and then find the intersectional points among race,class, labor, income and VOTING patterns that's the electoral KEY compass. The side issues are which party will collapse/split fisrt, the BInomial bipolar party system may come to an end. And lets remember the shadow forces of the glaring defects of the American USA Voting system...less than 40% of elegible citizens vote in Presidential elections and much much less in local state races....and the corrupt, illegal, mafia like control over state, local elections...(DNC fraud favoring HClinton over BSanders), which is becoming a business as usual en DEM control cities and states...why are dem/blue states refusing to open the voting rolls to FECommission???? the risk of institutional irrelevancy of voting??? In Los Angeles CA a School Board Member (selected.finance with the teachers Unions mega capital$$$) won his race with less than 300 votes in a city with 5miilion residents??????.

    Why assume low voter turnout is a problem? If someone doesn’t care, why should they vote? I’d rather that they didn’t, and the winner was determined by those motivated enough to vote. Or in some places, voting doesn’t matter. Here in NY, it makes no difference whom I vote for, for President or Senator. Dems win all those, all the time. (Not Governor though.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. rec1man says:
    @Anonymous Jew

    Really? How come so many are doctors, scientists and computer programmers? Those aren’t typically low-IQ professions. Is this just a case of aggressive brain-drain? Do all the stupid ones stay behind in India?
     
    Agree - this was the article's sole fault. I've seen data suggesting that the children of East Indians may be out outperforming Jews. However, if you look at data from their home countries and certain other East Indian populations around the world (not sure if anyone has data from adoption studies), it's clear East Indian success in the US/UK is due solely to highly selective immigration.

    I live and work in the Bay Area and know countless Indian uber-professionals (STEM PhDs, Stanford grads, Ivy League MBAs and on and on). The primary problem with every single one I've encountered is that they gulp down the SSSM-Cultural Marxist claptrap like a hungry dog eating spilled food. I was recently having a beer with an Indian Ivy League MBA and slipped into the conversation that low-skilled Latinos are under-performing, going on four generations. His reply was along the lines of "well, that's why we need to invest more money into their schools and communities." He's my friend, so I buried the urge to slap him in the face.

    I'm not sure how US East Indians' political leanings well evolve in the future. However, I'm worried that they will become the new Jews - taking on all the worst qualities of the 80% of US Jews that lean just to the left of Marx.

    In the future, East Indians may be useful in quelling some of the racial resentment brewing in the Brown underclass. Over the next few decades, we'll see East Indians (and half-White EA - I know a few Indian-White uber-professional couples with kids) climb to the top. Will the Mestizos look at some of the dark brown faces inhabiting the mansions they service as menial workers and think "there are brown people like me at the top" or will they think these are the new Jews, responsible for [insert latest conspiracy theory].

    Most Indians in USA, UK, tell their kids never bring home a black or a muslim

    Upper caste Indians in UK, USA , are more likely to marry a white than a lower caste Indian or a Indian Muslim or Indian Christian

    I ( Tamil-Brahmin ) have about 5 nieces and 2 nephews married to White Euro vs 2 nieces to Dravidians

    The preference order is Upper Caste Indian > White Euro > Lower Caste Indian > Anybody else > Black > Muslim

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    You've got that right. and most whites aren't good enough for them. (Are Jews considered white?)
    , @artichoke
    Makes sense generally, and don't you also have some arranged marriages? Upper caste Indians I've worked with have gone through that process, which I think can be superior to "dating".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. @schrub
    The author of this article mentions the split between northern and southern Brazil along racial laws.

    What happens when people simply start to increasingly reject Brazil's racial polarization?

    You will end up with more places like Blumenau, where the blonde, blue-eyed girl residents wear dirndls and the blonde, blue-eyed boys wear lederhosen and both speak German along with Portuguese,

    It is also, being very German, one of the most prosperous areas in Brazil (along with also being almost 95% white). Interestingly, their city also has the distinction of having the second largest Octoberfest celebration in the entire world after Munich, Germany.

    Needless to say, the bureaucrats up in the capital Brasilia are not amused by this parochialism.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blumenau

    BAD BEGINNINGS-

    There are a good number of pure white Portuguese in poverty-they are descended from the vagrants, drunks and prostitutes deported from Lisbon.

    But the real poor are the mixture of African and Brazilian Native American.

    German families who immigrated to South Brazil as families and capital underscore the insane K strategy reproductive poverty of Indians and blacks.

    Basically single black women in poverty in Brazil are given cocaine or booze and impregnated every year until there is a huge number of impoverished street kids-6 to a woman who cannot afford to pay for any of them.

    This become like cats in a dumpster.

    US blacks are not quite so out-of-control. But they begin having kids out-of-wedlock as teens and continue until 40 and have 3-4 kids with no fathers.

    Black men, whose balls are always charged to put more of a burden on the welfare system, will begin having children at 17 and often father 5 kids.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. RobinG says:
    @rec1man
    Most Indians in USA, UK, tell their kids never bring home a black or a muslim

    Upper caste Indians in UK, USA , are more likely to marry a white than a lower caste Indian or a Indian Muslim or Indian Christian

    I ( Tamil-Brahmin ) have about 5 nieces and 2 nephews married to White Euro vs 2 nieces to Dravidians

    The preference order is Upper Caste Indian > White Euro > Lower Caste Indian > Anybody else > Black > Muslim

    You’ve got that right. and most whites aren’t good enough for them. (Are Jews considered white?)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. artichoke says:
    @rec1man
    Most Indians in USA, UK, tell their kids never bring home a black or a muslim

    Upper caste Indians in UK, USA , are more likely to marry a white than a lower caste Indian or a Indian Muslim or Indian Christian

    I ( Tamil-Brahmin ) have about 5 nieces and 2 nephews married to White Euro vs 2 nieces to Dravidians

    The preference order is Upper Caste Indian > White Euro > Lower Caste Indian > Anybody else > Black > Muslim

    Makes sense generally, and don’t you also have some arranged marriages? Upper caste Indians I’ve worked with have gone through that process, which I think can be superior to “dating”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Whether she moderates her Israel views or not, this should be a wake-up call to Jews. Hispanics, blacks and Asians either see Jews as white or, if they do separate Jews from whites, see them as "the man" keeping them down even more than gentile whites.

    Non-whites have zero guilt about the WWII holocaust (let's remember that history is chaulk full of holocausts so I refuse to captialize the one directed toward Jews and others in the early 1940s as the one and only). Jews can't guilt non-whites into doing things.

    That being said, Jews will still control the money and organization of the Dem Party as well as the media. That's a lot of power and likely will allow Jews to keep the anti-Israel views to a minimum.

    However, it's one thing to control a party of people who look like you, who generally like you, whom you can guilt on a moment's notice and who - generally - genuinely support Israel. It's a whole other ball game to barely keep the lid of a party of people who don't look like you, who generally don't like you, whom you can't guilt and who genuinely don't support Israel. The latter is a slave/master relationship and that only last as long as you have the whip and the dog. The minute those slaves think that they can kill you, they will.

    For Jewish elites, the demographic transformation of the United States (and Europe, for that matter) is hitting the point of deminishing returns and, in my opinion, actually starting to become "bad for the Jews."

    If Jewish leaders ever realize this, it's be shocking how fast the media and academia starts supporting strict immigration control.

    Either way, it's entirely possible that we may have seen "Peak Jew" in the West. Not saying that Jews won't continue to wield huge amounts of power for a long time to come. I'm just suggesting that they won't have the free reign that they had over the past 50 years.

    Jewish influence-

    Porn as an empire is fading-Goldstein himself died homeless and remarked that “nobody buys porn any longer, its free on the internet”

    The MSM is a joke. The internet undermined it.

    Hollywood holds strong.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
    Celebrities seem to be doubling down on the crazy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. Corvinus says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country
    As you can tell from my comments, I'm all for a move toward the Nationalist Right for whites. However, that being said, the examples of California and Texas point not toward increased white identity and a GOP (or some other party) representing whites, but to whites just insulating and isolating.

    But whites do seem to be waking up a bit recently. I've seen subtle, but noticeable, changes in many white people's attitude. There seems to be a realization by many whites that, yes, everyone else is playing the race/tribal game except whites and that non-whites aren't just going to give up their identity and become whites in dark face. Granted, these slowly awakening whites aren't quite sure what to do with new information. For now, they mostly just seem disappointed in non-whites not acting like whites.

    However, at some point, disappointment will turn to the realization that if everyone else is going to play that game, we need to play as well.

    “As you can tell from my comments, I’m all for a move toward the Nationalist Right for whites.”

    That’s fine and dandy, just realize that there will always be a significant portion of whites who will be in opposition.

    “But whites do seem to be waking up a bit recently. I’ve seen subtle, but noticeable, changes in many white people’s attitude.”

    Some whites, assuredly.

    “Granted, these slowly awakening whites aren’t quite sure what to do with new information.”

    Probably just take it with a grain of salt.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. Dr. Doom says:

    Nationalism, No! Patriotism, Si! Democracy doesn’t need populism. The Minority Rules.

    You have to see this garbage to believe it. The crazy quilt the left made with fears of White Power is now falling apart after celebrating its end. Is that a brilliant plan? Globalists don’t need America, they still can count on the angry Russians and Chinese.

    This “diversity” is just the Balkans. Its not profitable. That wonderful service economy is going broke. Dead malls. Bankrupt retail chains. Boarded up housing and commercial property.

    Resident Gump says the Train is Fine. Whew, that’s a relief.

    Read More
    • Replies: @artichoke
    What are you talking about, seriously? Regarding your last snark, Trump is trying to bring back manufacturing so we're not just a service economy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. @Jeff Stryker
    Jewish influence-

    Porn as an empire is fading-Goldstein himself died homeless and remarked that "nobody buys porn any longer, its free on the internet"

    The MSM is a joke. The internet undermined it.

    Hollywood holds strong.

    Celebrities seem to be doubling down on the crazy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. George says:
    @Seamus Padraig

    However, most Asian immigrants are not East Asians and their IQs (such as those of Indians or Pakistanis) are much lower.
     
    Really? How come so many are doctors, scientists and computer programmers? Those aren't typically low-IQ professions. Is this just a case of aggressive brain-drain? Do all the stupid ones stay behind in India?

    In homogenous societies, for example, politics tends to divide along class and cultural lines. As a society becomes more diverse, however, ethnicity begins to play a growing role.
     
    Yup. That's probably why the Democratic Party traded class war for race war.

    Another interesting New York City result* was Carolyn Maloney vs Suraj Patel. Maloney like Crowley is a long time NY pol, except she won against Patel. Patel got about as many votes as ¡Ocasio! did.

    A funny aspect of the Patel campaign is Patel was accused of getting financing from India-ana. His immigrant parents apparently own a hospitality industry empire in the Hoosier state and wrote him a big check to get him started in NYC politics. Raising the question: Who let these Indianan Patels into New York City? Can’t we build a wall along the Delaware Water Gap?

    One reason NYC has so much money is people from flyover states and elsewhere keep financing their kids’ lifestyle and silly dreams in NYC. I tend to think election $$$ would go further in Indiana. But he might have to convert to Baptist like VP Pence did.

    * I guess only NYC results are interesting

    NYC election results including District 12 Maloney v Patel.

    https://www.politico.com/election-results/2018/new-york/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Another interesting New York City result* was Carolyn Maloney vs Suraj Patel.
     
    Let me guess. Both come from communities obsessed with an ancestral nation beginning with I.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. very good article. Genetics is destiny.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  98. Read More
    • Replies: @Iberiano
    All these white dems appear genuinely surprised that the aptly named Cortez would go all in, once she won--as if somehow she is going to restrain herself by any of the "caveats" they throw at her ('it was a heavily democrat district...he didn't really campaign...it's one election people"). One of the beautiful things about watching so-called minorities (planet majorities) is that they almost never have any self-reflection or introspection, nor "respect" for those who have babied them all the way up. Didn't the dems see this with Obama? There's no "wait your turn" for any of these people.

    The borg doesn't care if she fizzles. The point is, there will be another, then another, to replace her, and with each success of failure, they will become more bold and antagonizing, until they are dragging the old white Irish and Italian dems from their homes at gunpoint, to drive straight to the ATM during some riot.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. artichoke says:
    @Dr. Doom
    Nationalism, No! Patriotism, Si! Democracy doesn't need populism. The Minority Rules.

    You have to see this garbage to believe it. The crazy quilt the left made with fears of White Power is now falling apart after celebrating its end. Is that a brilliant plan? Globalists don't need America, they still can count on the angry Russians and Chinese.

    This "diversity" is just the Balkans. Its not profitable. That wonderful service economy is going broke. Dead malls. Bankrupt retail chains. Boarded up housing and commercial property.

    Resident Gump says the Train is Fine. Whew, that's a relief.

    What are you talking about, seriously? Regarding your last snark, Trump is trying to bring back manufacturing so we’re not just a service economy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. MBlanc46 says:
    @WorkingClass
    Post Imperial America will balkanize. There is plenty of room for four or more new republics. At least one of them will be white.

    Disaggregation is the only positive way forward for the US.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. Iberiano says:
    @Escher

    Since 1992, the white share of the Democratic presidential vote has dropped an average of about one percent per year. At its current rate, it could tip to majority-minority status by 2020. It will occur no later than 2024.
     
    Probably long before, at least in the lower socioeconomic segments, older millennials, Gen-X and older people, who are affected by immigration where it hurts, in the pocket. I have encountered many dyed in the wool liberals making subtle remarks about how their workplace and/or neighborhood is changing so much that they feel like strangers.

    It is interesting to watch all the #Walkaway videos, particularly of Gen-Xers like myself, because regardless of the (white) person’s background (gay, straight, feminist, weirdo, whatever), they are basically coding what the real issue is: Race. Someone can make a 15 minute video tip toeing around it, but they basically are doing the political version of “we just wanted better schools”. A few have overtly said they did not like all the race baiting–which is a bit of a pink pill, but I suspect many feel stronger than what they are saying. They are, rightly, seeing the dems as the party of the 3rd world types.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. Iberiano says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty
    Looks like the Empire might already be striking back:

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-12/ocasio-cortez-warns-crowley-might-be-mounting-third-party-run

    All these white dems appear genuinely surprised that the aptly named Cortez would go all in, once she won–as if somehow she is going to restrain herself by any of the “caveats” they throw at her (‘it was a heavily democrat district…he didn’t really campaign…it’s one election people”). One of the beautiful things about watching so-called minorities (planet majorities) is that they almost never have any self-reflection or introspection, nor “respect” for those who have babied them all the way up. Didn’t the dems see this with Obama? There’s no “wait your turn” for any of these people.

    The borg doesn’t care if she fizzles. The point is, there will be another, then another, to replace her, and with each success of failure, they will become more bold and antagonizing, until they are dragging the old white Irish and Italian dems from their homes at gunpoint, to drive straight to the ATM during some riot.

    Read More
    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. @WorkingClass
    Post Imperial America will balkanize. There is plenty of room for four or more new republics. At least one of them will be white.

    There is plenty of room for four or more new republics. At least one of them will be white.

    We already have fifty republics. Some– Montana, Vermont, Wyoming, New Hampshire– are already white.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Whether she moderates her Israel views or not, this should be a wake-up call to Jews. Hispanics, blacks and Asians either see Jews as white or, if they do separate Jews from whites, see them as "the man" keeping them down even more than gentile whites.

    Non-whites have zero guilt about the WWII holocaust (let's remember that history is chaulk full of holocausts so I refuse to captialize the one directed toward Jews and others in the early 1940s as the one and only). Jews can't guilt non-whites into doing things.

    That being said, Jews will still control the money and organization of the Dem Party as well as the media. That's a lot of power and likely will allow Jews to keep the anti-Israel views to a minimum.

    However, it's one thing to control a party of people who look like you, who generally like you, whom you can guilt on a moment's notice and who - generally - genuinely support Israel. It's a whole other ball game to barely keep the lid of a party of people who don't look like you, who generally don't like you, whom you can't guilt and who genuinely don't support Israel. The latter is a slave/master relationship and that only last as long as you have the whip and the dog. The minute those slaves think that they can kill you, they will.

    For Jewish elites, the demographic transformation of the United States (and Europe, for that matter) is hitting the point of deminishing returns and, in my opinion, actually starting to become "bad for the Jews."

    If Jewish leaders ever realize this, it's be shocking how fast the media and academia starts supporting strict immigration control.

    Either way, it's entirely possible that we may have seen "Peak Jew" in the West. Not saying that Jews won't continue to wield huge amounts of power for a long time to come. I'm just suggesting that they won't have the free reign that they had over the past 50 years.

    Either way, it’s entirely possible that we may have seen “Peak Jew” in the West.

    Some countries, eg, Australia and Argentina, saw it decades ago.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. @Thomm

    why do their successes in almost all cases derive from what they’ve stolen from us?
     
    Don't say 'us'. You were not part of the community that produced those innovations.

    WN wiggers are not the same race as successful whites, but rather a defective subrace within whites. You have no more in common with us than a pygmy in the Congo has with Usain Bolt.

    Quit trying to take credit for something produced by people that you could not emulate in a million years.

    White Trashionalists have negro IQs.

    WN wiggers are not the same race as successful whites, but rather a defective subrace within whites

    .

    Yeah, “WN wiggers” like Samuel FB Morse and Henry Ford never invented anything. All the credit goes to those “credit-to-their-race” whites with rainbow flags flying from their mainline churches.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. @George
    Another interesting New York City result* was Carolyn Maloney vs Suraj Patel. Maloney like Crowley is a long time NY pol, except she won against Patel. Patel got about as many votes as ¡Ocasio! did.

    A funny aspect of the Patel campaign is Patel was accused of getting financing from India-ana. His immigrant parents apparently own a hospitality industry empire in the Hoosier state and wrote him a big check to get him started in NYC politics. Raising the question: Who let these Indianan Patels into New York City? Can't we build a wall along the Delaware Water Gap?

    One reason NYC has so much money is people from flyover states and elsewhere keep financing their kids' lifestyle and silly dreams in NYC. I tend to think election $$$ would go further in Indiana. But he might have to convert to Baptist like VP Pence did.

    * I guess only NYC results are interesting

    NYC election results including District 12 Maloney v Patel.
    https://www.politico.com/election-results/2018/new-york/

    Another interesting New York City result* was Carolyn Maloney vs Suraj Patel.

    Let me guess. Both come from communities obsessed with an ancestral nation beginning with I.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?