The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Edmund Connelly Archive
No Campus (Or Country) for White Men
greer1-768x432
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Does anyone remember my column of nine years ago called “Letter of Termination to the White Race?” I don’t believe we know who really wrote this letter — or why, but the point is, it paints a chilling picture of what is in fact happening to the White race right before our eyes.

For instance, in the letter the author laid out what is in sad reality unfolding:

By carefully controlling and managing the schools, universities, media, and press, this “out group” has managed to convince the great bulk of your racial kinsmen that not only is resistance futile, but that it is immoral, barbaric, depraved, and unworthy of a “thinking” individual. By promoting the stereotype of a “racist redneck resistance,” they have made the idea of a struggle for White Identity a veritable sin in the minds of nearly every White person. In short: they have convinced European-derived peoples that a prolonged suicide is preferable to the unmitigated evil of “racism.”

Do I need to suggest who this “outgroup” might be?

TOO has emphatically emphasized the reality of this War on Whites, featuring the topic Anti-White Attitudes in fifty-three articles, and in particular the topic Jews as a Hostile Elite, fifty-five times. My article today belongs in either category [Ed.: actually both!].

Nine years ago, I was very taken with a literal belief that Whites were being systematically attacked in a coordinated strategy against us. I have no reason to doubt this now. Around the time I wrote “Letter of Termination to the White Race,” I also wrote kindred columns. For instance, I wrote about former Washington Post political columnist, Harold Meyerson, no friend of the White race.

Meyerson once wrote that “whiteness is a huge problem,” which of course means he believes Whites are a huge problem, just as his fellow Tribe members Noel Ignatiev, Susan Sontag, and a host of others have believed. Well, when Jews say these things, we flesh-and-blood Whites have good reason to worry, since these sentiments have often resulted in rivers of the blood of non-Jews. For example, it was not even a century ago that Bolshevik Jews became a hostile elite in Russia and, not coincidentally, millions upon millions of White Christians perished.

Our editor Kevin MacDonald has been in the fore in chronicling these massacres, nowhere better than in his review “Stalin’s Willing Executioners,” where he wrote, “If there is any lesson to be learned, it is that Jews not only became an elite in all these areas, they became a hostile elite — hostile to the traditional people and cultures of all three areas they came to dominate.” MacDonald made this case based on the bold theses presented in Yuri Slezkine’s book The Jewish Century. As we will see, Slezkine provides much fodder for the theme that non-Jews should indeed take Jewish hostility seriously.

MacDonald expanded on this theme in the foreword to Tom Sunic’s Homo Americanus, arguing that the current American regime is “maintained less by brute force than by an unrelenting, enormously sophisticated, and massively effective campaign to constrain political and cultural activity within very narrow boundaries.” Government death squads are not yet acting at the behest of our hostile elites, and dissenters “are not yet trundled off to jail or beaten with truncheons, but [they] are quietly ignored and marginalized. Or they are held up to public disgrace, and, wherever possible, removed from their livelihood.”

The key point, however, is that this could change — and quickly. We know any number of White activists who have suffered job loss without apology. We know the countless times law-abiding White Nationalist groups have been denied the right to free speech, physically attacked for their beliefs (with slap-on-the-wrist sentences, if they are prosecuted at all), and we know that others fighting for our cause have ended up in prison (often with long prison terms, even for non-violent offenses).

Looking at developments in Russia during and after the Revolution, it seems quite possible that America may experience the same trajectory. In Russia, Slezkine tells us that so many viewed the Jews as non-threatening outsiders, yet during the Red Terror, Christians expressed shock that seemingly pacifistic Jews changed almost overnight: “We were amazed by what we had least expected to encounter among the Jews: cruelty, sadism, and violence had seemed alien to a nation so far removed from physical, warlike activity; those who yesterday did not know how to use a gun are now found among the executioners and cutthroats.”

Slezkine also describes a “formerly oppressed lover of liberty [who] had turned into a tyrant of ‘unheard-of despotic arbitrariness.’” He had been “transformed outwardly into a leather-clad person with a revolver and, in fact, lost all human likeness.” He could now be pictured as “standing in a Cheka basement doing ‘bloody but honorable revolutionary work.’”

Quoting MacDonald in his Slezkine review once more, we can conclude that, “Indeed, hatred toward the peoples and cultures of non-Jews … has been the Jewish norm throughout history . . . this sort of hostility to whites and to Christianity is a mainstream Jewish phenomenon.”

Which finally brings us to today’s topic: a new book by Scott Greer, deputy editor/columnist for The Daily Caller, called No Campus for White Men: The Transformation of Higher Education into Hateful Indoctrination. I ran into this book last month when F. Roger Devlin reviewed it at American Renaissance. It’s a fine review, but of course no experienced reader of AmRen expects to read about the root cause of the campus war on White men. Those in the know, however, can still savor Devlin’s nod to the “Marxist inspiration” that has created the current campus climate:

ORDER IT NOW

Political correctness is an ideology that grew up around preferential policies in order to protect and rationalize them. Of obviously Marxist inspiration, it substitutes white male heterosexual students for Marx’s bourgeoisie as the “oppressor” class, and non-whites, women and homosexual students for Marx’s proletariat or “oppressed” class. The ideology of political correctness constantly tries to stoke resentment among the “oppressed” and foster guilt among the “oppressors.”

Sounds like a familiar Tribe at work to me.

Then, upon finding another review of Greer’s book, this time at Counter-Currents, I had the familiar fear that Jewish machinations were going to go unexplored yet again — more than halfway through the review by Timothy Rohrer, as solid as it was, there was still no mention of the obvious cause of this campus war on White men. Then, thankfully — finally — Rohrer spelled it out: “The role of the Jews in this system is the critical element explaining why things have happened as they did.”

Really, does anything more need to be said? Rohrer is spot on when he points to activist Jews and the organized Jewish community, just as literally thousands of other real Whites have been over the last few hundred years. We KNOW this stuff already. After all, it has been more than a decade since MacDonald wrote about Slezkine’s admissions with respect to “Stalin’s Willing Executioners.”

Honestly, it is child’s play to show how Jews have essentially taken over higher education in America, transforming it into something akin to a “Jewish extended phenotype,” with Jews themselves doing much of the heavy lifting, but getting plenty of help from their recruited lackeys such as blacks and other non-whites, women, and disparate aggrieved groups that are now popping up like toadstools after a summer’s rain.

I remember back in the late ‘80s or perhaps it was the early ‘90s, when I found that five, six, or maybe even seven of the eight Ivy League presidents “happened” to be Jewish (oh, where was the echo meme then!). I shared this observation with just about anyone unfortunate enough to have been in my vicinity, but with depressing regularity, the response was a blasé, “So what?”

Well, for starters, the “So what?” is No Campus for White Men. And a mulatto president for eight years. And no White Protestants on the Supreme Court. And a media ruled by a hostile elite. And open borders. And the cultivation of “White pathology.” And the plunder of our economy (and Iceland’s, and Russia’s . . .).

Okay, let’s focus just on the campus. Author Greer doesn’t go near the Jewish Question, but we can easily see who rules academia, which group gets plum jobs out of proportion to their numbers or merit and so on. Take the obvious case of Elena Kagan, who lacked the serious qualifications it takes to become Dean of Harvard Law School. The evidence points strongly to the conclusion that she was appointed due to ethnic connections and in turn appointed Jewish professors based on the same ethnic connections.

Not only did she serve as Dean of Harvard Law, she was appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States, a development which MacDonald finds egregious [my emphasis added twice]:

Kagan is remarkably unqualified to be a Supreme Court Justice in terms of the usual standards: judicial experience, academic publications, or even courtroom experience. Rather, all the evidence is that Kagan owes her impending confirmation to her Jewish ethnic connections (see also here).

The same goes for Jewish over-representation in elite academic institutions – far higher than can be explained by higher Jewish IQ. Does anyone seriously think that Jewish domination of Hollywood and the so much of the other mainstream media is about merit rather than ethnic networking and solidarity? And then there’s the addiction of the new elite to affirmative action for non-Whites.

Whatever else one can say about the new elite, it certainly does not believe in merit. The only common denominator is that Whites of European extraction are being systematically excluded and displaced to the point that they are now underrepresented in all the important areas of the elite compared to their percentage of the population. The new elite distinguishes itself mainly by its hostility to the traditional people and culture of those they displaced. It is an elite that cannot say its name. Indeed the ADL was all over Pat Buchanan for merely mentioning that Kagan is Jewish and that, upon her confirmation, Jews would be one-third of the Supreme Court.

Folks, I gotta tell ya that this obsession with replacing Whites (particularly White males) with others is, well, obsessive. There can be no doubt that it’s a Jewish strategy. Take a look, for instance, at Andrew Joyce’s recent TOO essay “TEAM Westport: A Case Study in anti-White Activism”, which superbly documents feverish Jewish activism aimed at White displacement in a very White (92.6%) upscale town in Connecticut.

For our purposes, however, I’d like you to look through typical college job ads such as those found on this long list for Liberal Arts. Here’s what you’ll commonly find [again, emphasis added]:

Connecticut College is a private, highly selective institution with a demonstrated commitment to outstanding faculty teaching and research. Recognizing that intellectual vitality and diversity are inseparable, the College has embarked on a significantly successful initiative to diversify its faculty, student body and curriculum. The College seeks creative scholars excited about working in a liberal arts setting, with its strong focus on engaged teaching, participation in shared governance, and active involvement in an institution-wide advancement of diversity. We encourage applications from candidates who share this understanding of the faculty role and will contribute to the diversity of our college community, including members of historically underrepresented groups.

“Diversity” is so important that it’s mentioned four times in one paragraph. One could be forgiven for thinking that the entire purpose of the college is to promote diversity. And just to make people aware that they are on the side of the angels and committed to letting less talented people get jobs if they have the right skin color, there just had to be a mention of “historically underrepresented groups.”

Or take this. Am I the only one who detects contradiction in what they write? Do you think goy White males will be treated as “equally” as others?

Wells College is committed to a policy of nondiscrimination and equal opportunity for all persons. The College seeks to promote diversity in all of its hires; members of under-represented populations are strongly encouraged to apply.

Here’s another example. What, concretely, might they mean by this, anyway? How does one show a “proven commitment” in this instance? By skin color? Dress? Sexual orientation?:

We are keenly interested in candidates with a proven commitment to engaging in and promoting a diverse, multicultural community.

None of this will surprise most readers, as most of us have encountered such blunt statements of discrimination for decades. Part and parcel of “equality,” you see.

Again, I need to stress that in the campus setting, despite the attention aggrieved students who may be Black, Hispanic or Asian may get, when it comes to those relatively rare cases where Jewish interests conflict with those of their shabbos goy cannon fodder, Jews come out ahead, at least in most cases.

For instance, back in 2014, Native American professor Steven Salaita left a tenured position in Virginia to take up a post at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Foolishly, he thought that on his own time using Twitter, he could be mildly negative about what Israelis were then inflicting on the Palestinians (again). He wrote such things as “Let’s cut to the chase: If you’re defending #Israel right now, you’re an awful human being.”

Didn’t Salaita understand that you don’t reveal such thoughts, let alone tweet them, when you are preparing to teach at an American campus with 3,500 Jewish students? Sure enough, his tenure offer was rescinded, setting up a legal drama where he was given a significant settlement in exchange for never teaching at Urbana-Champaign.

Or take Tony Martin’s case, where the Wellesley professor of Africana Studies pointed out the disproportionate Jewish role in the slave trade. The abuse he endured prompted him to write a book called The Jewish Onslaught.

In modern feminism, Jewish feminists have had to confront the anti-Zionist platforms of non-Jewish women, as Joyce Antler discusses in The Journey Home: How Jewish Women Shaped Modern America. For example, at the United Nations International Women’s Decade Conference in Mexico City in 1975, when “Third World delegates began to attack Israeli representatives as ‘racists,’ all Jewish women attending the conference felt at risk; for Letty Cottin Pogrebin, this was the ‘click’ that initiated her life as a ‘Jewish-feminist.’” Five years later, in Copenhagen, the next U.N. Women’s conference was even worse in this respect. From these experiences emerged attempts to rid the feminist movement of anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism; Pogrebin, for instance, wrote an eleven-page article in Ms. magazine that “described the prevalence of anti-Semitism on the political right as well as the radical left, within the black community, and among Christian feminists who blamed Jewish monotheism for the extinction of goddess cults and the death of Jesus.”

Hmm, some of the chickens coming home to roost?

In any case, I am pleased that Timothy Rohrer’s review of No Campus for White Men directed our attention to this issue. On one level, we can roll our eyes upon hearing of the latest nonsense going on at some university or other, but on too many other levels, this process of White dispossession is deadly serious. Universities provide instruction that leads to important jobs and prepares the next generation for leadership of the culture and the country. The campus War on White Men, I am convinced, is but a prelude to the real war — the coming attempt at the extermination of the White race — a “hot” war, as opposed to the current “cool” gradual swamping of Whites via immigration, destruction of White families, etc.

This is deadly serious stuff, as I said, so we had best face the problem directly. Oddly, I’ve had this impression since Trump’s election that Alt Right sites that normally emphasize the Jewish Question have pulled back from discussing it, possibly in an attempt to gain “respectability” for the new administration and its Alt Right supporters. Now that the thrill of the Trump victory turns into the grueling reality of politics as usual, however, let’s hope that these sites return to writing about The Jewish Problem bluntly and honestly. Without a grim determination to face the issue, successful responses are not likely to appear on their own.

In closing, I’ll share an impression I had upon hearing the title No Campus for White Men. Some years ago I wrote about Cormac McCarthy’s bleak novel No Country for Old Men, and wove it into an account of the decline of America in step with the decline of Whites. I concluded that our situation could just as easily read No Country for White Men. A fortiori, this is true of the new book No Campus for White Men.

(Reprinted from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Probably no comments, since whites are cowering behind a door somewhere, and afraid to comment here. Well, I say, even though only one of my parents is white, that for an unknown reason, whites are so effeminate now a days, that fail to respond to their own demise, putting a strong front against their eternal enemy, the Talmudist. I feel pity for those whites who are frightened by some one calling them racist, anti Semites, anti ect. I once challenged a Talmudist to tell me what a Semite is so I would know who I was against, or as he said, ‘anti’. Talmudist failed to tell me who the Semites are! Thus I sent him to find out who the Semites were, and I believe after finding out, he kept it to himself since this Talmudist never again repeated such a useless anti tantrum.
    Talmudist know that only European descendants are capable to put a fight against their clever and subtle attacks on humanity. Why? Because other races are not aware of their historical atrocities i.e. the Russian holocaust, the destruction they have done to humanity. And now, no one except ‘some’ whites are aware of the talmudist nefarious plans for America, and are trying to wake up the dormant majority, who are so controlled by the MSM, that it will take an act of God to bringing them to reality, and fight for their survival against the evil talmudist who are with all their evil satanic might trying to annihilate Christianity forever; They will not succeed though, since they are fighting against the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, but they might come close, too close if Christians do not come out of their stupid stupor where they even consider their deadly foe as ‘god’s people’

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/article/no-campus-or-country-for-white-men/#comment-1796508
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. You can carry on about “The Jews” all you want, and many (or even all) of your observations may indeed be accurate. But until you own a meaningful part of the indoctrination apparatus, AKA MSM, your pleadings will forever be ineffectual.

    We have no shortage of people willing to “face the issue” and no shortage of people in full command of the facts. But facts are next to irrelevant when your opponent holds what Steve Sailer calls “the Megaphone”.

    What are you going to do about that? Because it’s really the only thing that matters. So long as your opponent holds a virtual monopoly upon what I call “the production of truth” your road will remain rough and relatively untraveled. The stranglehold upon the mass media is where–you might say–the rubber meets that road.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    But facts are next to irrelevant when your opponent holds what Steve Sailer calls “the Megaphone”.
     
    It has always been understood that democracy is impossible without a free press. America has a mainstream media controlled by about six people (who have little if any sympathy for the fast declining Euro-American majority), which indicates that whatever is the proper description of the American government, it is not democratic.

    Some hold that the so-called "alt media" constitute a free press, but ten million bloggers opinionating without significant investigative resources does not an informed press make.

    Donald Trump may have made a laughing stock of the Republicrat duopoly's chosen presidential candidates, and exposed the NY Times, WaPo and the rest of the MSM for the lying shysters they really are. But pretty certainly he'll achieve no fundamental change in the trajectory of American decline, demoralization, and disintegration. He will not break up the media oligopoly, he will not outlaw PC curbs on free speech, he will not make the social and economic changes to American society necessary to revive the fertility of the EuroAmerican population.

    Trump will just go on bombing the shit out of people in far away countries about which Americans know nothing, funneling obscene amounts of taxpayers' money to the MIC, and taking care of his friends on Wall St.

    , @Corvinus
    "So long as your opponent holds a virtual monopoly upon what I call “the production of truth” your road will remain rough and relatively untraveled."

    Corrected for accuracy --> The mainstream and alternative medias are involved in a war involving "the production of truth", with each side claiming their opponent is engaging in "fake news stories" and "alternative facts". In reality, both sides generate stories that contain elements of truth. It is up to an intelligent audience to read multiple stories from several sources, filter out the confirmation bias and wild generalizations, and generate their own conclusions. This task is monumentally difficult given how both groups demand to control the narrative for the public.
  3. “SJW University” lampoons one of many social engineering experiments that are currently being carried out by a self-serving global oligarchy.

    http://grrrgraphics.com/cartoonblog/sjw-university

    http://www.beyondthemediamatrix.net/

    Read More
  4. Even if the white race were humiliated to the level of Germany after WWI the solution would still be the same: The one that refuses to fight back deserves extinction! And all the steps taken from that point to the eventual glorification of that nation would need to be followed here. The nationalism and anti-globalism of Donald Trump is a good first step. Obviously much remains to be done but for each of us with ethnic ties to Europe the ability to defend oneself is paramount. Be glad Hillary didn’t win with her gun-grabbing anti-White agenda!

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    The one that refuses to fight back deserves extinction!
     
    Whether those who have been indoctrinated to hate their own kind deserve extinction is open to question. But it is undoubtedly the case that those who adulate feminists, promote queerdom, transgenderism and paedophilia, while failing to achieve a bare replacement rate of reproduction, will surely disappear from the face of the earth.
    , @Corvinus
    "Even if the white race were humiliated to the level of Germany after WWI the solution would still be the same: The one that refuses to fight back deserves extinction!"

    First, you assume all white people are being humiliated.

    Second, how are YOU fighting back? What specific things are you doing to ensure you don't become extinct?

    Third, are you proposing that if a white person doesn't "fight back" in the manner you prescribe that they should become "extinct"? If yes, are you not playing God in this particular circumstance?

  5. Speaking of ‘no country for whites’; there is a petition to the EU to allow white South Africans to return to Europe, as fears mount of genocide of whites.

    South Africa is about 8% white – about 4.5 million out of appoximately 55 million – and there are white genocide fears, with 4000-plus whites having been murdered recently – though the country is a violent place in general, and there is also substantial black-on-black ethnic violence, e.g., black South Africans attacking the many immigrants from even poorer Zimbabwe.

    Black South African government & organisation leaders, are not only calling for Zimbabwe-style expropriation of white lands, but in some cases hinting at genocidal violence. One black ‘Economic Freedom Fighter’ is quoted as saying that, “We are not calling for the slaughter of white people, at least for now.”

    There is a petition requesting that the European Union take a special decision to allow those of European ancestry of however ancient vintage, to return to live in Europe. Currently, a few European countries allow for citizenship if heritage can be proven through mutliple generations, although many limit citizenship to just children of citizen parents or in some cases also grand-parents. Here is the petition – initiated by a Brazilian, with tens of thousands of signatures:

    https://www.change.org/p/european-commission-allow-all-white-south-africans-the-right-to-return-to-europe

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johann
    During the Clinton regime I began to see the writing on the wall and applied through my father's birth certificate for an Irish passport which I was able to obtain. I still carry my Irish passport which gives me the feeling that I have some safe place where I can find refuge , hopefully. However Ireland has become more and more Americanized they have even replaced their icons of Christ over their doors and replaced them with portraits of Barack Obama.
  6. A cry for help by Gavin McInnes?:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aJGEOOwzEg

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wes
    Gavin McInnes thinks that because other genocides have happened, we shouldn't dwell on the holocaust as much. I'm not Jewish or white, but its painfully obvious that people dwell on past atrocities to make sure that their descendants never let it happen again.

    Plenty of atrocities and genocides have occurred, this cannot be denied. The way in which the descendants of those who were killed honor and remember their fallen, is completely up to them. If the Russians aren't as outward in the remembrance of their fallen, that's completely on them. Simply, you have no authority to dictate the way in which a people commemorate the lives of their dead.
  7. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Duplicate from another thread on Unz Review.
    I listened previous morning (Saturday March 11, 2017) fresh Radio Derb.
    As always, it was very good. One little comment.
    Derbyshire ascribes the birth of ethno-masochism
    to the this statement by Susan Sontag:

    The white race is the cancer of human history; it is the white race and it alone—its ideologies and inventions—which eradicates autonomous civilizations wherever it spreads, which has upset the ecological balance of the planet, which now threatens the very existence of life itself.

    Not a hint that she addressed this tirade to Jews (she was Jewish herself.)
    I asked numerous times on various threads on Unz Review if Jews are to be considered as belonging to white race, and invariably got the answers
    “No, they are not.”
    In this sense the tirade by Sontag should be classified towards ethno-sadism, and not ethno-masochism. Subsequent developments into ethno-masochism are subject to a separate discussion.
    Myself, I do not have an opinion on
    “if Jews are to be considered as belonging to white race,”
    and do not care.

    Read More
  8. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    A Nicaraguan, or a Venezuelan, or a Vietnamese, or a Korean, or an Iraqi, or a Syrian, or a Serbian, and numerous others could justifiably say: Stop your whining. You made your bed, now you must sleep in it.

    Read More
  9. I wouldn’t worry too hard about us White Guys, we’ll be OK. University education is becoming more irrelevant by the day, many of the graduates can barely write a letter and people are making jokes about what a woosey buncha pansy’s the profs are. we run most of the business’, own most of the guns and have most of the money, soon we will rise and cut down this rotten tree matter of fact Don’s sharpening our axe as we speak and Marine Lepen is winning in France. Putin is the true leader of the free World and he takes no shit. Be afraid little liberals be afraid!

    Read More
    • Agree: Stonehands
    • Replies: @epochehusserl
    Most white guys will probably be ok in the sense that we wont die but why do we need to be talked to like we are the scum of the earth by people who dont want us around/ and or dont care about our well being? Like Richard Spencer they need us, we dont need them. I could see something like a Taiping Heavenly Kingdom breakaway with the right charismatic leader.
    , @CanSpeccy

    I wouldn’t worry too hard about us White Guys, we’ll be OK.
     
    You sure? With a fertility rate well below replacement and mass immigration you'll soon be a minority not just in California and Texas, but across the country. Within a generation, as Bill Clinton announced to loud applause, in his 1998 commencement address at Portland State U.
  10. The current dominant Jewish ruling elites have taken Anglo-Saxon liberal individualism in a destructive direction that was foreshadowed by the “atomize the Goyim” doctrine of The Authoritarian Personality:

    Read More
  11. @Renoman
    I wouldn't worry too hard about us White Guys, we'll be OK. University education is becoming more irrelevant by the day, many of the graduates can barely write a letter and people are making jokes about what a woosey buncha pansy's the profs are. we run most of the business', own most of the guns and have most of the money, soon we will rise and cut down this rotten tree matter of fact Don's sharpening our axe as we speak and Marine Lepen is winning in France. Putin is the true leader of the free World and he takes no shit. Be afraid little liberals be afraid!

    Most white guys will probably be ok in the sense that we wont die but why do we need to be talked to like we are the scum of the earth by people who dont want us around/ and or dont care about our well being? Like Richard Spencer they need us, we dont need them. I could see something like a Taiping Heavenly Kingdom breakaway with the right charismatic leader.

    Read More
  12. @Brabantian
    Speaking of 'no country for whites'; there is a petition to the EU to allow white South Africans to return to Europe, as fears mount of genocide of whites.

    South Africa is about 8% white - about 4.5 million out of appoximately 55 million - and there are white genocide fears, with 4000-plus whites having been murdered recently - though the country is a violent place in general, and there is also substantial black-on-black ethnic violence, e.g., black South Africans attacking the many immigrants from even poorer Zimbabwe.

    Black South African government & organisation leaders, are not only calling for Zimbabwe-style expropriation of white lands, but in some cases hinting at genocidal violence. One black 'Economic Freedom Fighter' is quoted as saying that, "We are not calling for the slaughter of white people, at least for now."

    There is a petition requesting that the European Union take a special decision to allow those of European ancestry of however ancient vintage, to return to live in Europe. Currently, a few European countries allow for citizenship if heritage can be proven through mutliple generations, although many limit citizenship to just children of citizen parents or in some cases also grand-parents. Here is the petition - initiated by a Brazilian, with tens of thousands of signatures:

    https://www.change.org/p/european-commission-allow-all-white-south-africans-the-right-to-return-to-europe

    During the Clinton regime I began to see the writing on the wall and applied through my father’s birth certificate for an Irish passport which I was able to obtain. I still carry my Irish passport which gives me the feeling that I have some safe place where I can find refuge , hopefully. However Ireland has become more and more Americanized they have even replaced their icons of Christ over their doors and replaced them with portraits of Barack Obama.

    Read More
  13. Nine years ago, I was very taken with a literal belief that Whites were being systematically attacked in a coordinated strategy against us. I have no reason to doubt this now.

    Someone else noticed that as well, nearly a century ago, and we all know what happened to him. Still, dumbass whites think he was the enemy and prance around thinking they’re special because they played a part in crushing him.

    The stupidity is ineffably astonishing. Anything so stupid probably deserves to be extinguished.

    Another thing that shocks me with how stupid we “intelleigent” whites are is that few want to face the truth, and the truth is that our black, brown and Muslim brothers are generally not the enemy. We fall for divide and conquer every time. We are a race of suckers. Arrogant and hostile suckers to boot.

    I can’t tell you how often I’ve been sneered at for pointing out the truth about who the real enemies of the whites are. (Hint: They sit in positions of power.) Additionally, there is no way that we could agree on what the problems are and hence the prospects of doing something about it are nil. We cannot be united! We are simply too arrogant and ignorant.

    …always with the same secret thought and clear aim of ruining the hated white race … throwing it down from its cultural and political height, and himself rising to be its master.

    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/excerpts-from-mein-kampf

    We have, historically, been parties to massacring each other then running around praising ourselves for it.

    Stupid, stupid, stupid.

    Read More
  14. http://legalinsurrection.com/2017/03/u-michigan-student-admits-slashing-her-own-face-in-hate-crime-hoax/

    Effect of PC. Reality Denial and Narrative Conjuring.

    Reality is blacks commit lots of violence. But PC narrative sanctifies blacks as MLK people. So, black violence is disappeared by under-reporting, false reporting(violent riots called ‘peaceful protests), or semantic tricks(‘youths’ or ‘tens’ done it). Reality Denial.

    But denying reality isn’t enough. Just like UFO nuts are desperate to bear witness to UFO’s and just like paranormal people want to believe they’ve sensed the presence of ghosts, Paranormal Politics or Parapolitics must have ‘evidence’ or ‘witness’ or ‘revelation’ of White Ghosts since PC says whites possess evil spirits.
    It’s like if you tell people there is Bigfoot, many people mistake anything for bigfoot and day they saw it too.
    Or, to gain attention, affection, and approval of the Big Foot community, you tell a tall tale of how YOU saw one too. These tall tales are esp appealing to those who want attention but don’t get any. What better way to win affection than by serving as prop for the narrative. If the way to a man’s heart is through his stomach, the way to the Current Culture’s radar is through hysteria. The Coakley Coax or Coax Hoax.

    Every society has its taboos and sacraments and myths. And those who seek approval and attention within that community conjure fantasies or visions in accordance to the Narrative. So, in Catholic societies of old, people claimed to have witnessed Jesus or the Madonna.
    In Muslim societies, people claim to see Muslim miracles.
    Even though secular people are thought ‘factual’ or ‘rational’, they too have human psychology that is essentially mytho-conformist. or conformystic. And PC is neo-religion or neoligion. It has its own Conjurers.

    Under current PC, some people say they saw something they didn’t. Some say they are guilty of what they didn’t do. Since PC hegemony is about White Evil, all these sightings and confessions revolve around white hatred. Narrative Confomism and Narrative Affirmation. Just like people must keep donating money to ‘good causes’ or charities, they feel they must donate stories to the Cause to keep its fires going since dearth of stories will weaken the fire. After all, what use is a UFO cult is people no longer say they saw UFO’s? What use religion if people no longer believe in miracles? Just like Hollywood can’t go on without new movies, the Narrative needs new stories to keep it justified. This is why blacks and progs still act as if KKK is going around lynching blacks. Without new stories, the Narrative will just be an old story that is no longer relevant. Viable Narratives need Malevolence Relevance. (Some whites like to confess to stuff they didn’t do. White Atonement makes them feel holy. It’s like some guy in CRIME AND PUNISHMENT confesses to a crime he didn’t commit because Christian morality is about repentance.)
    PC has the logic of the Horror Genre. It is best understood as a form of paranormal pseudo-science.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vjk2So3KvSQ

    Gayday is passe. Now, the thing is KKK-dar.

    Read More
  15. @Renoman
    I wouldn't worry too hard about us White Guys, we'll be OK. University education is becoming more irrelevant by the day, many of the graduates can barely write a letter and people are making jokes about what a woosey buncha pansy's the profs are. we run most of the business', own most of the guns and have most of the money, soon we will rise and cut down this rotten tree matter of fact Don's sharpening our axe as we speak and Marine Lepen is winning in France. Putin is the true leader of the free World and he takes no shit. Be afraid little liberals be afraid!

    I wouldn’t worry too hard about us White Guys, we’ll be OK.

    You sure? With a fertility rate well below replacement and mass immigration you’ll soon be a minority not just in California and Texas, but across the country. Within a generation, as Bill Clinton announced to loud applause, in his 1998 commencement address at Portland State U.

    Read More
  16. @Robert Dunn
    Even if the white race were humiliated to the level of Germany after WWI the solution would still be the same: The one that refuses to fight back deserves extinction! And all the steps taken from that point to the eventual glorification of that nation would need to be followed here. The nationalism and anti-globalism of Donald Trump is a good first step. Obviously much remains to be done but for each of us with ethnic ties to Europe the ability to defend oneself is paramount. Be glad Hillary didn't win with her gun-grabbing anti-White agenda!

    The one that refuses to fight back deserves extinction!

    Whether those who have been indoctrinated to hate their own kind deserve extinction is open to question. But it is undoubtedly the case that those who adulate feminists, promote queerdom, transgenderism and paedophilia, while failing to achieve a bare replacement rate of reproduction, will surely disappear from the face of the earth.

    Read More
  17. @Kyle McKenna
    You can carry on about "The Jews" all you want, and many (or even all) of your observations may indeed be accurate. But until you own a meaningful part of the indoctrination apparatus, AKA MSM, your pleadings will forever be ineffectual.

    We have no shortage of people willing to "face the issue" and no shortage of people in full command of the facts. But facts are next to irrelevant when your opponent holds what Steve Sailer calls "the Megaphone".

    What are you going to do about that? Because it's really the only thing that matters. So long as your opponent holds a virtual monopoly upon what I call "the production of truth" your road will remain rough and relatively untraveled. The stranglehold upon the mass media is where--you might say--the rubber meets that road.

    But facts are next to irrelevant when your opponent holds what Steve Sailer calls “the Megaphone”.

    It has always been understood that democracy is impossible without a free press. America has a mainstream media controlled by about six people (who have little if any sympathy for the fast declining Euro-American majority), which indicates that whatever is the proper description of the American government, it is not democratic.

    Some hold that the so-called “alt media” constitute a free press, but ten million bloggers opinionating without significant investigative resources does not an informed press make.

    Donald Trump may have made a laughing stock of the Republicrat duopoly’s chosen presidential candidates, and exposed the NY Times, WaPo and the rest of the MSM for the lying shysters they really are. But pretty certainly he’ll achieve no fundamental change in the trajectory of American decline, demoralization, and disintegration. He will not break up the media oligopoly, he will not outlaw PC curbs on free speech, he will not make the social and economic changes to American society necessary to revive the fertility of the EuroAmerican population.

    Trump will just go on bombing the shit out of people in far away countries about which Americans know nothing, funneling obscene amounts of taxpayers’ money to the MIC, and taking care of his friends on Wall St.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Some hold that the so-called “alt media” constitute a free press, but ten million bloggers opinionating without significant investigative resources does not an informed press make."

    Ye of little faith. These millions of bloggers have clearly demonstrated their investigative chops. They are informed about the world that they see...from their own perspective. The Alt Media is alive and well.

    "he will not make the social and economic changes to American society necessary to revive the fertility of the EuroAmerican population."

    American whites have and will continue to make their own decisions as to who they will marry and procreate with. They need not be constantly badgered by you regarding their "duty" to increase the "EuroAmerican" population, as it is their liberty to have or not have children that are white or mixed.
  18. Or take Tony Martin’s case, where the Wellesley professor of Africana Studies pointed out the disproportionate Jewish role in the slave trade. The abuse he endured prompted him to write a book called The Jewish Onslaught.

    They jumped all over Louis Farrakhan for mistakenly saying Jews owned 75% of the slaves when he meant to say 75% of Jewish households owned slaves.

    Then they jumped on Prof. Martin for saying 75% of Jewish households owned slaves without further clarifying that this statistic applied to the Jews of the South, and not nationwide.

    Now, one of the sources for the statistics cited by Minister Farrakhan and Prof. Martin is a study by Ira Rosenwaike, The Jewish Population in 1820, published by the American Jewish Historical Society.

    In it, Rosenwaike states:

    “In Charleston, Richmond and Savannah the large majority (over three-fourths) of the Jewish households contained one or more slaves; in Baltimore, only one out of three households were slaveholding; in New York, one out of eighteen….Among the slaveholding households the median number of slaves owned ranged from five in Savannah to one in New York.”

    SOURCE: “The Jewish Population in 1820,” in Abraham J. Karp, ed., The Jewish Experience in America: Selected Studies from the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society (Waltham, Massachusetts, 1969, 3 volumes), volume 2, pp. 2, 17, 19.

    Now, if anyone should doubt the veracity of the Rosenwaike source (I’m not naming names, but a certain crow comes to mind), I’ve (hopefully… it’s the first time I tried doing this) reproduced images below of the following pages (pp.. 147-8) and Table 1 (pp.150-1), just so there can be no disputing the validity of these figures:

    <a title=”"http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    <a title=”"http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    <a title=”"http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    <a title=”"http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    NB: while Rosenwaike states in the body of the text that in the 3 southern communities, “the large majority (over three-fourths) of the Jewish households contained one or more slaves,” the information he presented in the tables (see below) suggest the figure was more like 83%. The same goes for the national average. While Rosenwaike states that "probably two-fifths of the Jewish families of 1820 owned slaves," the information in his tables (see below) suggest the number was more like 46%:

    Total Jewish households in 3 Southern communities (Charleston, Richmond, Savannah):

    109 + 32 + 21 = 162

    Total number of Jewish slaveholding households in 3 Southern communities (Charleston, Richmond, Savannah):

    92 + 25 + 17 = 134

    Proportion of Southern Jewish households that owned slaves in 1820:

    134/162 = 83% (as opposed to 75%)

    Total Jewish households in 6 communities (Charleston, NYC, Philadelphia, Richmond, Baltimore, Savannah):

    109 + 74 + 58 + 32 + 21 + 21 = 315

    Total number of Jewish slaveholding households in 6 communities (Charleston, NYC, Philadelphia, Richmond, Baltimore, Savannah):

    92 + 4 + 0 + 25 + 7 + 17 = 145

    Proportion of Jewish households in US that owned slaves in 1820:

    145/315 = 46% (as opposed to 40%)

    P.S. If more details are required, more can be furnished as Rosenwaike was meticulous enough in his research to provide us with the names of the 145 households that owned slaves.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62
    Oops, that didn't work... one more time:

    https://s1.postimg.org/c85idiuy3/image.png

    https://s1.postimg.org/8ptih4u23/image.png

    https://s1.postimg.org/6mj39gu97/image.png

    https://s1.postimg.org/ljrkah7hn/image.png
    , @RobinG
    OMG, not again. Shouldn't this come under the category of "Who the Hell cares?" Those were the mores of the day, a few generations before Jack Benny and Rochester. So most Jews who could afford it had one or two house servants. Seems like a huge waste of pixels without any particular point.
    , @Corvinus
    “They jumped all over Louis Farrakhan for mistakenly saying Jews owned 75% of the slaves when he meant to say 75% of Jewish households owned slaves.”

    People jumped all over him for insisting that a Jewish historian agreed with one of his conclusions. That Jewish historian took him to task, stating that he disagreed! And it was Martin, one of Farrakhan’s friends, who claimed that Farrakhan misspoke.

    “Then they jumped on Prof. Martin for saying 75% of Jewish households owned slaves without further clarifying that this statistic applied to the Jews of the South, and not nationwide.”

    No, only Jews in three southern particular cities in 1820! Martin misrepresented the statistic. Do you not get that through your head?

    You got absolutely destroyed on another thread, then decide to come here to make the same bogus claims. Martin claimed that statistic to be nationwide, but in reality was local. Since he misinformed his audience on this particular point, it has lead people to doubt his other claims, as evident by the refutations I provided that you have yet to address in a previous thread.

    “While Rosenwaike states that "probably two-fifths of the Jewish families of 1820 owned slaves," the information in his tables (see below) suggest the number was more like 46%:”

    [Laughs] Did you not state on a previous thread that it is “relatively trivial thing to challenge a particular statistic ( i.e., 70%), as there are a number of assumptions upon which this statistic is based that are easily assailable”? And didn’t I say that the proportion of slaveholders has never been an accurate measure of the social or economic importance of slaveholding, unless it is assessed on a broadly regional or state-by-state basis? Would not purchasing slaves be a sign of one’s ethnic display of superiority or because of the family’s wealth, or both?

    While there is merit to Martin’s work, there are also significant holes in his scholarship, as several sources I have offered indicate in a previous thread, which you still have yet to make any substantial remarks about. Interesting, to say the least.

    For example, Junius Rodriguez (The Historical Encyclopedia of World Slavery, Volume 1, ABC-CLIO, 1997) referenced…

    “A few Jews even became prominent slave owning planters in the Old South…as successful as these Jewish Southerners were by Southern standards, they represent a very tiny percentage of the 20,000 Jews residing in the antebellum South who could, or would, ever aspire to own a slave. About 5,000 Jews owned one or more slaves – about 1.25 percent of all the slaveowners in the antebellum South…For those Jews who did own slaves, the records demonstrate that they were not significantly different from other masters in their treatments of their bondsmen.”

    Note that the antebellum period covers the period before the Civil War, 1820-1860.

    Regardless of factual accuracy, some would argue that these numbers are meaningless since they neglect to account for any other difference in demographics besides religion. For example, poorer families were less likely to own slaves than wealthier families.

    If we account for all other factors, it ends up there is no statistically significant difference between Jews and the overall population in terms of slave ownership, especially since levels of slave ownership varied in the southern states and in southern cities. For example, this source (forward.com/articles/205455/slaves-of-charleston/?p=all) notes that in 1830 the proportion of Jewish residents of Charleston who owned slaves was similar to that of the general white population (83% versus 87%).
  19. @geokat62

    Or take Tony Martin’s case, where the Wellesley professor of Africana Studies pointed out the disproportionate Jewish role in the slave trade. The abuse he endured prompted him to write a book called The Jewish Onslaught.
     
    They jumped all over Louis Farrakhan for mistakenly saying Jews owned 75% of the slaves when he meant to say 75% of Jewish households owned slaves.

    Then they jumped on Prof. Martin for saying 75% of Jewish households owned slaves without further clarifying that this statistic applied to the Jews of the South, and not nationwide.

    Now, one of the sources for the statistics cited by Minister Farrakhan and Prof. Martin is a study by Ira Rosenwaike, The Jewish Population in 1820, published by the American Jewish Historical Society.

    In it, Rosenwaike states:


    "In Charleston, Richmond and Savannah the large majority (over three-fourths) of the Jewish households contained one or more slaves; in Baltimore, only one out of three households were slaveholding; in New York, one out of eighteen....Among the slaveholding households the median number of slaves owned ranged from five in Savannah to one in New York."

    SOURCE: "The Jewish Population in 1820," in Abraham J. Karp, ed., The Jewish Experience in America: Selected Studies from the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society (Waltham, Massachusetts, 1969, 3 volumes), volume 2, pp. 2, 17, 19.
     

    Now, if anyone should doubt the veracity of the Rosenwaike source (I'm not naming names, but a certain crow comes to mind), I've (hopefully... it's the first time I tried doing this) reproduced images below of the following pages (pp.. 147-8) and Table 1 (pp.150-1), just so there can be no disputing the validity of these figures:

    <a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    <a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    <a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    <a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    NB: while Rosenwaike states in the body of the text that in the 3 southern communities, "the large majority (over three-fourths) of the Jewish households contained one or more slaves," the information he presented in the tables (see below) suggest the figure was more like 83%. The same goes for the national average. While Rosenwaike states that "probably two-fifths of the Jewish families of 1820 owned slaves," the information in his tables (see below) suggest the number was more like 46%:


    Total Jewish households in 3 Southern communities (Charleston, Richmond, Savannah):

    109 + 32 + 21 = 162

    Total number of Jewish slaveholding households in 3 Southern communities (Charleston, Richmond, Savannah):

    92 + 25 + 17 = 134

    Proportion of Southern Jewish households that owned slaves in 1820:

    134/162 = 83% (as opposed to 75%)


    Total Jewish households in 6 communities (Charleston, NYC, Philadelphia, Richmond, Baltimore, Savannah):

    109 + 74 + 58 + 32 + 21 + 21 = 315

    Total number of Jewish slaveholding households in 6 communities (Charleston, NYC, Philadelphia, Richmond, Baltimore, Savannah):

    92 + 4 + 0 + 25 + 7 + 17 = 145

    Proportion of Jewish households in US that owned slaves in 1820:

    145/315 = 46% (as opposed to 40%)
     

    P.S. If more details are required, more can be furnished as Rosenwaike was meticulous enough in his research to provide us with the names of the 145 households that owned slaves.
    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    No one can read them. They are thumbnail images.
  20. This is a great article and one that merits serious consideration by all white people with healthy racial instincts. Jewish power and influence is the glue that holds American Bolshevism together and they are deliberately and with malice aforethought, creating conditions that will lead to the physical genocide of the white race in N. America and throughout the Western world.

    The explosion in stridently anti-white movies (like Django Unchained), college courses, sitcoms and news reporting is designed to dehumanize white people in the eyes of non-whites and turn whites against themselves and make them ambivalent about their own racial survial. This endeavor has been wildly successful.

    This is also why the left works so tirelessly to abridge the second amendment since this is that white man’s last line of defense and I guarantee we will need to exercise these rights much sooner than any of us desire.

    Read More
    • Replies: @mcohen
    this article confuses me.

    most jews living in america are white yet this author and his chorus of stinkfoots claim jews are to blame.so by saying jews are causing white genocide he is implying that jews themselves are included in this genocide.sort of a racial suicide.what a load of stinkfoot.

    unless of course relegion makes the skin whiter than a nuns panties.is the christian white blaming the jewish white for all there troubles.is this an attempt to demonize israel along racial lines.what if jesus was in fact non white.would he be blamed for the so called white genocide.all these south american invaders of the usa are non white catholics.are they not your brothers with which to share the fish and loaves.

    stinkfoot wants to bring relegion into it.why
  21. No appreciable awakening to the menace of organized international Jewry will ever happen without:

    A. The acknowledgement that the “Holocaust” was a figment of Allied propaganda and never took place. While the Jews were subject to some harshly repressive measures under the Third Reich after the war against the Soviet Union began, there never was a plan to murder the Jews of Europe. The “gas chambers” were a badly crafted hoax and any suffering the Jews experienced can only be seen within the context of the total war that was raging all over Europe, and was in all likelihood milder than that of the non-Jewish non-combatants of the belligerents.

    As long as the religion of the Shoah Business remains sacrosanct in the west, international Jewry can continue to shame and beat down the gentiles using the all purpose verbal bludgeon of “antisemitism” and the “6 million” to intimidate them into silence. The myth of the “Holocaust” must be exorcised from the western mind if we desire to be truly free and independent.

    B. The demythologization of the Second World War. It was not a “good war.” It was initiated – primarily by the British War Party, the FDR administration, and international Zionism -and fought with the destruction of nationalist Germany and its independent economy in mind. The war had absolutely nothing to do with “Nazi aggression” seeing as Great Britain, the U.S. and the USSR had a much worse track record of territorial aggrandizement and bellicosity than Germany.

    C. The vastly preponderant role of international Jewry in bringing about the Bolshevik Revolution and its hideous, murderous consequences must become common knowledge. The hugely disproportionate Jewish role in the early Soviet governments, not to mention in the Soviet secret police and the construction and administration of the Gulag must cease to be a well kept secret known only to a very few.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Amasius
    You're absolutely right. All jewish power ultimately flows from the holocaust legend and the mythologized version of WW2. As long as these remain, any attempt to unseat them is useless. Any criticism of the jews is immediately met with "Anti-semite, Nazis, holocaust. Sit down." And the Whites sit down and cower. With their misguided sense of honor, Whites will be paying off the debt of the "holocaust" forever, until the race is extinct. Fabula delenda est.

    White people are generally chivalrous (of course there are exceptions). They protect and shelter the weak, they don't brutalize them. The jews figured this out a long time ago; they take advantage of our kindness and decency by pretending to be the victims when they are in reality the victimIZERS. If the host ultimately fights back, they just go somewhere else and start it up again with a new mark. "Those horrible Egyptians/Persians/Greeks/Romans/Spanish/English/Poles/Germans/Russians were so mean to us! For no reason! You'll take us in, right?" They've been working the scam for 3000 to 4000 years, depending on whether you want to go back to Egypt with the Hyksos, or Abraham being hustled out of Ur. Whites need to come together and call the liars out; they need to end this once and for all.

    They're lying to you, White man! They're taking advantage of you! Just stop listening to them!
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    Great comment as usual. I would only add to B), Polish intransigence. Now, as then, Poles seem happy to be cannon fodder for the US-Anglo-Zionist war machine. I just don't get it.
  22. @Mulegino1
    No appreciable awakening to the menace of organized international Jewry will ever happen without:

    A. The acknowledgement that the "Holocaust" was a figment of Allied propaganda and never took place. While the Jews were subject to some harshly repressive measures under the Third Reich after the war against the Soviet Union began, there never was a plan to murder the Jews of Europe. The "gas chambers" were a badly crafted hoax and any suffering the Jews experienced can only be seen within the context of the total war that was raging all over Europe, and was in all likelihood milder than that of the non-Jewish non-combatants of the belligerents.

    As long as the religion of the Shoah Business remains sacrosanct in the west, international Jewry can continue to shame and beat down the gentiles using the all purpose verbal bludgeon of "antisemitism" and the "6 million" to intimidate them into silence. The myth of the "Holocaust" must be exorcised from the western mind if we desire to be truly free and independent.

    B. The demythologization of the Second World War. It was not a "good war." It was initiated - primarily by the British War Party, the FDR administration, and international Zionism -and fought with the destruction of nationalist Germany and its independent economy in mind. The war had absolutely nothing to do with "Nazi aggression" seeing as Great Britain, the U.S. and the USSR had a much worse track record of territorial aggrandizement and bellicosity than Germany.

    C. The vastly preponderant role of international Jewry in bringing about the Bolshevik Revolution and its hideous, murderous consequences must become common knowledge. The hugely disproportionate Jewish role in the early Soviet governments, not to mention in the Soviet secret police and the construction and administration of the Gulag must cease to be a well kept secret known only to a very few.

    You’re absolutely right. All jewish power ultimately flows from the holocaust legend and the mythologized version of WW2. As long as these remain, any attempt to unseat them is useless. Any criticism of the jews is immediately met with “Anti-semite, Nazis, holocaust. Sit down.” And the Whites sit down and cower. With their misguided sense of honor, Whites will be paying off the debt of the “holocaust” forever, until the race is extinct. Fabula delenda est.

    White people are generally chivalrous (of course there are exceptions). They protect and shelter the weak, they don’t brutalize them. The jews figured this out a long time ago; they take advantage of our kindness and decency by pretending to be the victims when they are in reality the victimIZERS. If the host ultimately fights back, they just go somewhere else and start it up again with a new mark. “Those horrible Egyptians/Persians/Greeks/Romans/Spanish/English/Poles/Germans/Russians were so mean to us! For no reason! You’ll take us in, right?” They’ve been working the scam for 3000 to 4000 years, depending on whether you want to go back to Egypt with the Hyksos, or Abraham being hustled out of Ur. Whites need to come together and call the liars out; they need to end this once and for all.

    They’re lying to you, White man! They’re taking advantage of you! Just stop listening to them!

    Read More
  23. @geokat62

    Or take Tony Martin’s case, where the Wellesley professor of Africana Studies pointed out the disproportionate Jewish role in the slave trade. The abuse he endured prompted him to write a book called The Jewish Onslaught.
     
    They jumped all over Louis Farrakhan for mistakenly saying Jews owned 75% of the slaves when he meant to say 75% of Jewish households owned slaves.

    Then they jumped on Prof. Martin for saying 75% of Jewish households owned slaves without further clarifying that this statistic applied to the Jews of the South, and not nationwide.

    Now, one of the sources for the statistics cited by Minister Farrakhan and Prof. Martin is a study by Ira Rosenwaike, The Jewish Population in 1820, published by the American Jewish Historical Society.

    In it, Rosenwaike states:


    "In Charleston, Richmond and Savannah the large majority (over three-fourths) of the Jewish households contained one or more slaves; in Baltimore, only one out of three households were slaveholding; in New York, one out of eighteen....Among the slaveholding households the median number of slaves owned ranged from five in Savannah to one in New York."

    SOURCE: "The Jewish Population in 1820," in Abraham J. Karp, ed., The Jewish Experience in America: Selected Studies from the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society (Waltham, Massachusetts, 1969, 3 volumes), volume 2, pp. 2, 17, 19.
     

    Now, if anyone should doubt the veracity of the Rosenwaike source (I'm not naming names, but a certain crow comes to mind), I've (hopefully... it's the first time I tried doing this) reproduced images below of the following pages (pp.. 147-8) and Table 1 (pp.150-1), just so there can be no disputing the validity of these figures:

    <a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    <a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    <a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    <a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    NB: while Rosenwaike states in the body of the text that in the 3 southern communities, "the large majority (over three-fourths) of the Jewish households contained one or more slaves," the information he presented in the tables (see below) suggest the figure was more like 83%. The same goes for the national average. While Rosenwaike states that "probably two-fifths of the Jewish families of 1820 owned slaves," the information in his tables (see below) suggest the number was more like 46%:


    Total Jewish households in 3 Southern communities (Charleston, Richmond, Savannah):

    109 + 32 + 21 = 162

    Total number of Jewish slaveholding households in 3 Southern communities (Charleston, Richmond, Savannah):

    92 + 25 + 17 = 134

    Proportion of Southern Jewish households that owned slaves in 1820:

    134/162 = 83% (as opposed to 75%)


    Total Jewish households in 6 communities (Charleston, NYC, Philadelphia, Richmond, Baltimore, Savannah):

    109 + 74 + 58 + 32 + 21 + 21 = 315

    Total number of Jewish slaveholding households in 6 communities (Charleston, NYC, Philadelphia, Richmond, Baltimore, Savannah):

    92 + 4 + 0 + 25 + 7 + 17 = 145

    Proportion of Jewish households in US that owned slaves in 1820:

    145/315 = 46% (as opposed to 40%)
     

    P.S. If more details are required, more can be furnished as Rosenwaike was meticulous enough in his research to provide us with the names of the 145 households that owned slaves.

    OMG, not again. Shouldn’t this come under the category of “Who the Hell cares?” Those were the mores of the day, a few generations before Jack Benny and Rochester. So most Jews who could afford it had one or two house servants. Seems like a huge waste of pixels without any particular point.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    Seems like a huge waste of pixels without any particular point.
     
    I respectfully disagree. The point is this: Prof. Anthony Martin was subjected to a Jewish Onslaught (the title of one of his books) for having the temerity of adding The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews to the class syllabus. To prevent others from following suit, they attacked him by resorting to a number of tactics that I cited earlier.

    Among the many on that list, one tactic was to attack the integrity of Prof. Martin by casting doubt on the validity of the information contained in TSR.

    The information I posted in #19 clearly shows that TSR accurately referenced the primary sources and, as a result, it vindicates the late Prof. Martin's reputation.
  24. White men has been on the receiving end of reverse racism for the last 30-40 years.

    Read More
  25. @KenH
    This is a great article and one that merits serious consideration by all white people with healthy racial instincts. Jewish power and influence is the glue that holds American Bolshevism together and they are deliberately and with malice aforethought, creating conditions that will lead to the physical genocide of the white race in N. America and throughout the Western world.

    The explosion in stridently anti-white movies (like Django Unchained), college courses, sitcoms and news reporting is designed to dehumanize white people in the eyes of non-whites and turn whites against themselves and make them ambivalent about their own racial survial. This endeavor has been wildly successful.

    This is also why the left works so tirelessly to abridge the second amendment since this is that white man's last line of defense and I guarantee we will need to exercise these rights much sooner than any of us desire.

    this article confuses me.

    most jews living in america are white yet this author and his chorus of stinkfoots claim jews are to blame.so by saying jews are causing white genocide he is implying that jews themselves are included in this genocide.sort of a racial suicide.what a load of stinkfoot.

    unless of course relegion makes the skin whiter than a nuns panties.is the christian white blaming the jewish white for all there troubles.is this an attempt to demonize israel along racial lines.what if jesus was in fact non white.would he be blamed for the so called white genocide.all these south american invaders of the usa are non white catholics.are they not your brothers with which to share the fish and loaves.

    stinkfoot wants to bring relegion into it.why

    Read More
    • Replies: @Paul C.
    Have you read this?

    http://educate-yourself.org/cn/protocolsofsion.shtml
    , @Amasius
    Jews aren't White.

    http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-are-not-white-response-to-haaretz-article/

    Not by race, certainly not by identity.
  26. @mcohen
    this article confuses me.

    most jews living in america are white yet this author and his chorus of stinkfoots claim jews are to blame.so by saying jews are causing white genocide he is implying that jews themselves are included in this genocide.sort of a racial suicide.what a load of stinkfoot.

    unless of course relegion makes the skin whiter than a nuns panties.is the christian white blaming the jewish white for all there troubles.is this an attempt to demonize israel along racial lines.what if jesus was in fact non white.would he be blamed for the so called white genocide.all these south american invaders of the usa are non white catholics.are they not your brothers with which to share the fish and loaves.

    stinkfoot wants to bring relegion into it.why
    Read More
  27. Edmund Connelly hits a home-run with this bold analysis. And his editor, Kevin MacDonald, has been an all-star on this topic for years. Unfortunately, these two major players–and others like them–have been relegated to playing in the marginalized whites-only ‘minor’ league.

    What makes their intellectual circuit ‘minor’?

    White advocacy is 1) continuously and widely derided, dismissed and labeled as ‘extreme’; and 2) it is strategically denied a large or ‘respectable’ audience.

    This keeps men like MacDonald marginalized and exiled to the intellectual wilderness.

    This is no accident. The marginalization is top-down affair. Its restrictions involve law, custom, major media, politics, entertainment and education.

    Kosher censorship and kosher defamation is very much alive and well. Ruthlessly so. It has given us politically-correct totalitarianism that is labeled ‘mainstream’. This is no small achievement.

    Thus the status and character of men like MacDonald are always under attack.

    This process of defamation is part of a larger strategy which aims to: 1) elevate Jewish suffering, Jewish cohesion (Israel), Jewish greatness and Jewish centrality in the West, as it 2) derides and ignores white achievement, white culture, white customs and white interests in white-majority countries. This too is no small achievement.

    At the same time, this pan-Zionist movement glosses over the genuine schism between Judaism and moral universalism. And it constantly depicts white cohesion as racist, backwards, and universally threatening.

    But these contrived double-standards are fast appearing hollow, especially to whites who increasingly realize that they are fast-becoming resented minorities in the very civilizations that they and their forefathers created.

    With that in mind, where’s our affirmative action?

    Where’s our ‘Free Speech Movement’?

    It’s not there.

    And it’s not there by design.

    But if there are to be set-asides based on skin color, why then are there no set-asides for white people and white interests?

    Ahh, but the ‘Jewish community’ would have us to believe that whites have no racial interests.

    That’s racist!

    Yes, there is certainly a proud, protected and intact ‘Jewish community’, but there is no such thing as a ‘white community’. No such thing.

    Got that?

    Rest assured that the kosher powers-that-be will continue to do whatever’s necessary to keep men like MacDonald and Connelly off-camera, off the radar, reviled and invisible. Marginalization is their speciality. So stop spewing your white racist nonsense!

    The dire significance of this grand political distortion cannot be overemphasized. Malevolent Talmudic power has an international array of enemies, including European-derived peoples. This situation is not new. But it constitutes a clear and present danger to the well-being and safety of our culture, our communities, and our children.

    Read More
  28. @mcohen
    this article confuses me.

    most jews living in america are white yet this author and his chorus of stinkfoots claim jews are to blame.so by saying jews are causing white genocide he is implying that jews themselves are included in this genocide.sort of a racial suicide.what a load of stinkfoot.

    unless of course relegion makes the skin whiter than a nuns panties.is the christian white blaming the jewish white for all there troubles.is this an attempt to demonize israel along racial lines.what if jesus was in fact non white.would he be blamed for the so called white genocide.all these south american invaders of the usa are non white catholics.are they not your brothers with which to share the fish and loaves.

    stinkfoot wants to bring relegion into it.why

    Jews aren’t White.

    http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-are-not-white-response-to-haaretz-article/

    Not by race, certainly not by identity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    That is true, because to Jews 'white' equals 'the linguistically and culturally European peoples of Christendom.'

    And whether they are latter day Pharisees or atheists, the vast majority of Jews hate Christendom. That hatred is so deep and wide that most jews seem actually to prefer the thought of being overrun by brown and back Moslems than to see any vestige of Christendom survive.

    And that is a suicidal position.
  29. The power of mockery is about all we have left. We must use it. Aristophanes was feared because of it.

    Read More
  30. @RobinG
    OMG, not again. Shouldn't this come under the category of "Who the Hell cares?" Those were the mores of the day, a few generations before Jack Benny and Rochester. So most Jews who could afford it had one or two house servants. Seems like a huge waste of pixels without any particular point.

    Seems like a huge waste of pixels without any particular point.

    I respectfully disagree. The point is this: Prof. Anthony Martin was subjected to a Jewish Onslaught (the title of one of his books) for having the temerity of adding The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews to the class syllabus. To prevent others from following suit, they attacked him by resorting to a number of tactics that I cited earlier.

    Among the many on that list, one tactic was to attack the integrity of Prof. Martin by casting doubt on the validity of the information contained in TSR.

    The information I posted in #19 clearly shows that TSR accurately referenced the primary sources and, as a result, it vindicates the late Prof. Martin’s reputation.

    Read More
  31. “Well, for starters, the “So what?” is No Campus for White Men. And a mulatto president for eight years. And no White Protestants on the Supreme Court.”

    I reckon that’s a good place to start to make the pint that blaming the Jews for all of this is silly at best. In fact, it is much worse than silly. If you fail to discern the root cause, the point of origin, then your cures will always fail.

    From whence did this philosemitism come? It came from those exact English-speaking Protestants who are not now on the Supreme Court and who are 50% of Barck Obama’s bloodline.

    Anglo-Saxon Puritans were theological Judaizers. The theological Judaizing led, naturally, to political and cultural philo-semitism. Once the Anglo-Saxon Puritans had what amounted to an early Modern version of totalitarian stranglehold on the former kingdom, Oliver Cromwell invited Jews back into England. Not only did they invite the Jews to return to England, but they gave Jews rights and privileges denied to a clear majority of native British Isles Christians.

    Nor did that English promotion of Jews at the expense of ‘other’ whites begin with Cromwell. The Tudors had used Jewish resentment against Spain especially but also France to make alliances, getting loans from Jews to wage war and secure a Protestant kingdom. All that formed Modern English culture, becoming part of its core. Jews just seemed to be natural allies for the English as they waged wars to exterminate non-English European languages and destroy everything about any non-Protestant people they could overwhelm.

    In the US, the WASP Elites allied with Jews almost as soon as Jews produced ruthlessly rich businessmen to make the arrangement. Jewish mythology whines about the rich WASP country clubs that would not admit Jews, but the two groups were allied in waging culture war against white Catholics and white southerners before the end of the 19th century.

    Jews are so central to the horrors of our time because the founders of Modern English culture, who produced America’s WASP Elites, were philo-semites. If not for that history, Jews could not have done what they have.

    The problem is a given with WASP culture, which has always hated most white Christians who are not Anglo-Saxon and/or are not Protestant (in some cultural sense).

    Read More
  32. @Amasius
    Jews aren't White.

    http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-are-not-white-response-to-haaretz-article/

    Not by race, certainly not by identity.

    That is true, because to Jews ‘white’ equals ‘the linguistically and culturally European peoples of Christendom.’

    And whether they are latter day Pharisees or atheists, the vast majority of Jews hate Christendom. That hatred is so deep and wide that most jews seem actually to prefer the thought of being overrun by brown and back Moslems than to see any vestige of Christendom survive.

    And that is a suicidal position.

    Read More
  33. This systematic purge of white males on American university campuses has spawned an entire industry — the “diversity profession”, a parasite class of workers whose members suck away institutional resources from the core mission, teaching and research. These diversity specialists work out very nicely for the careerist, spineless university presidents allowing them to remain above the fray while the hired goons conduct the purges, agitate the minority students and faculty, crank out the agitprop and intimidate the whites who are not thrilled to be constantly monitored and bullied. These guys are always non-white and hence untouchable. As parasites they grow stronger while gradually weakening and eventually destroying the host.

    See: http://fosterspeak.blogspot.com/2017/03/diversity-speak-animal-farm-at-wright.html

    Read More
  34. @geokat62
    Oops, that didn't work... one more time:

    https://s1.postimg.org/c85idiuy3/image.png

    https://s1.postimg.org/8ptih4u23/image.png

    https://s1.postimg.org/6mj39gu97/image.png

    https://s1.postimg.org/ljrkah7hn/image.png

    No one can read them. They are thumbnail images.

    Read More
  35. @geokat62

    Or take Tony Martin’s case, where the Wellesley professor of Africana Studies pointed out the disproportionate Jewish role in the slave trade. The abuse he endured prompted him to write a book called The Jewish Onslaught.
     
    They jumped all over Louis Farrakhan for mistakenly saying Jews owned 75% of the slaves when he meant to say 75% of Jewish households owned slaves.

    Then they jumped on Prof. Martin for saying 75% of Jewish households owned slaves without further clarifying that this statistic applied to the Jews of the South, and not nationwide.

    Now, one of the sources for the statistics cited by Minister Farrakhan and Prof. Martin is a study by Ira Rosenwaike, The Jewish Population in 1820, published by the American Jewish Historical Society.

    In it, Rosenwaike states:


    "In Charleston, Richmond and Savannah the large majority (over three-fourths) of the Jewish households contained one or more slaves; in Baltimore, only one out of three households were slaveholding; in New York, one out of eighteen....Among the slaveholding households the median number of slaves owned ranged from five in Savannah to one in New York."

    SOURCE: "The Jewish Population in 1820," in Abraham J. Karp, ed., The Jewish Experience in America: Selected Studies from the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society (Waltham, Massachusetts, 1969, 3 volumes), volume 2, pp. 2, 17, 19.
     

    Now, if anyone should doubt the veracity of the Rosenwaike source (I'm not naming names, but a certain crow comes to mind), I've (hopefully... it's the first time I tried doing this) reproduced images below of the following pages (pp.. 147-8) and Table 1 (pp.150-1), just so there can be no disputing the validity of these figures:

    <a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    <a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    <a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    <a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography

    NB: while Rosenwaike states in the body of the text that in the 3 southern communities, "the large majority (over three-fourths) of the Jewish households contained one or more slaves," the information he presented in the tables (see below) suggest the figure was more like 83%. The same goes for the national average. While Rosenwaike states that "probably two-fifths of the Jewish families of 1820 owned slaves," the information in his tables (see below) suggest the number was more like 46%:


    Total Jewish households in 3 Southern communities (Charleston, Richmond, Savannah):

    109 + 32 + 21 = 162

    Total number of Jewish slaveholding households in 3 Southern communities (Charleston, Richmond, Savannah):

    92 + 25 + 17 = 134

    Proportion of Southern Jewish households that owned slaves in 1820:

    134/162 = 83% (as opposed to 75%)


    Total Jewish households in 6 communities (Charleston, NYC, Philadelphia, Richmond, Baltimore, Savannah):

    109 + 74 + 58 + 32 + 21 + 21 = 315

    Total number of Jewish slaveholding households in 6 communities (Charleston, NYC, Philadelphia, Richmond, Baltimore, Savannah):

    92 + 4 + 0 + 25 + 7 + 17 = 145

    Proportion of Jewish households in US that owned slaves in 1820:

    145/315 = 46% (as opposed to 40%)
     

    P.S. If more details are required, more can be furnished as Rosenwaike was meticulous enough in his research to provide us with the names of the 145 households that owned slaves.

    “They jumped all over Louis Farrakhan for mistakenly saying Jews owned 75% of the slaves when he meant to say 75% of Jewish households owned slaves.”

    People jumped all over him for insisting that a Jewish historian agreed with one of his conclusions. That Jewish historian took him to task, stating that he disagreed! And it was Martin, one of Farrakhan’s friends, who claimed that Farrakhan misspoke.

    “Then they jumped on Prof. Martin for saying 75% of Jewish households owned slaves without further clarifying that this statistic applied to the Jews of the South, and not nationwide.”

    No, only Jews in three southern particular cities in 1820! Martin misrepresented the statistic. Do you not get that through your head?

    You got absolutely destroyed on another thread, then decide to come here to make the same bogus claims. Martin claimed that statistic to be nationwide, but in reality was local. Since he misinformed his audience on this particular point, it has lead people to doubt his other claims, as evident by the refutations I provided that you have yet to address in a previous thread.

    “While Rosenwaike states that “probably two-fifths of the Jewish families of 1820 owned slaves,” the information in his tables (see below) suggest the number was more like 46%:”

    [Laughs] Did you not state on a previous thread that it is “relatively trivial thing to challenge a particular statistic ( i.e., 70%), as there are a number of assumptions upon which this statistic is based that are easily assailable”? And didn’t I say that the proportion of slaveholders has never been an accurate measure of the social or economic importance of slaveholding, unless it is assessed on a broadly regional or state-by-state basis? Would not purchasing slaves be a sign of one’s ethnic display of superiority or because of the family’s wealth, or both?

    While there is merit to Martin’s work, there are also significant holes in his scholarship, as several sources I have offered indicate in a previous thread, which you still have yet to make any substantial remarks about. Interesting, to say the least.

    For example, Junius Rodriguez (The Historical Encyclopedia of World Slavery, Volume 1, ABC-CLIO, 1997) referenced…

    “A few Jews even became prominent slave owning planters in the Old South…as successful as these Jewish Southerners were by Southern standards, they represent a very tiny percentage of the 20,000 Jews residing in the antebellum South who could, or would, ever aspire to own a slave. About 5,000 Jews owned one or more slaves – about 1.25 percent of all the slaveowners in the antebellum South…For those Jews who did own slaves, the records demonstrate that they were not significantly different from other masters in their treatments of their bondsmen.”

    Note that the antebellum period covers the period before the Civil War, 1820-1860.

    Regardless of factual accuracy, some would argue that these numbers are meaningless since they neglect to account for any other difference in demographics besides religion. For example, poorer families were less likely to own slaves than wealthier families.

    If we account for all other factors, it ends up there is no statistically significant difference between Jews and the overall population in terms of slave ownership, especially since levels of slave ownership varied in the southern states and in southern cities. For example, this source (forward.com/articles/205455/slaves-of-charleston/?p=all) notes that in 1830 the proportion of Jewish residents of Charleston who owned slaves was similar to that of the general white population (83% versus 87%).

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    If we account for all other factors, it ends up there is no statistically significant difference between Jews and the overall population in terms of slave ownership, especially since levels of slave ownership varied in the southern states and in southern cities.
     
    It turns out that the original Jewish sources referenced in TSR are silent about slavery and the overall population. Here's what I mean.

    After managing to get my hands on the primary sources referenced in TSR, I now have a better understanding of what Rosenwaike was driving at in the following quote from p. 130 of TSR:


    Rosenwaike, whose Jewish population studies have been published in the major Jewish historical journals, has recently analyzed the 1971 population studies of Lee Soltow. Rosenwaike does not dispute Soltow's startling findings:

    "Soltow estimates that 36 percent of the 625,000 families in the South in 1830 were slaveholders. Of the 322 household heads identified in the present study as [Jewish] residents of the same states at this enumeration, a considerably larger proportion - 75 percent - were owners of one or more slaves."
     

    In order to do an apples to apples comparison with the data presented in Soltow's study, Rosenwaike dropped New York and Pennsylvania (non-slavery states in 1830) as both of these states were not part of the 14 Southern slave states included in Soltow's analysis.

    Here are the two key statistics Soltow presented on Table 1 of his study, Economic Inequality in the US:

    Slaveholders = 224,000
    Families in South = 625,000

    Slaveholder proportion = 36%

    What is important to note is the title Soltow attached to this table: Table 1, THE DISTRIBUTION OF SLAVES AMONG SLAVEHOLDERS IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1830, 1850, and 1860

    He did not title it: Table 1, THE DISTRIBUTION OF SLAVES AMONG SLAVEHOLDERS IN THE SOUTHERN UNITED STATES IN 1830, 1850, and 1860

    Further, on p. 826, Soltow elaborates on his methodology:


    The earliest census data for which all manuscripts are extant is the year 1830. I have drawn a random sample of families of size 6,911 from the microfilm of the 14 states (and the District of Columbia) which effectively had slavery.6

    Footnote 6: The 14 states and the District of Columbia include Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia.
     

    And should there be any doubt about the quality of his work as a demographer, here's how one scholar summed up Rosenwaike's On The Edge of Greatness:

    We owe much to conscientious historical demographers such as Ira Rosenwaike, whose Population History of New York City (1972) is of lasting value for urban and ethnic history. In the present work [i.e., On The Edge of Greatness] Rosenwaike uses his skills to wring from the census of 1830 a statistical profile of American Jewry before the great migration of German Jews, who in the next decades were to alter the character of Jewish life. This work exceeds simple compilation, since the census provides no clues regarding religion. By using various public and religious records, Rosenwaike has succeeded in identifying 629 Jewish households with some four thousand members, about whom he fashioned fifty statistical tables relating to such matters as the origins of household heads (a substantial majority were foreign born), age and sex ratios (roughly similar to those of urban Gentiles), the number of Jewish slaveholders (a majority of the 322 southern households that Rosenwaike studied owned slaves), and the occupations of Jews in the major cities. - Review of Books. Edward K. Spann (Indiana State University), p. 986
     
    So, on the basis of the information presented in these two Jewish sources, Prof. Martin was indeed correct when he said "75% of Jewish households owned slaves" or "more than twice as many Jews owned slaves as compared to whites (36%)," as these statistics were drawn from Ira Rosenwaike's analysis that attempted to do an apples-to-apples comparison with Lee Soltow's study, which focused on the 14 Southern slave states. It should be noted that it was these two Jewish scholars that decided to base their comparisons on the 14 Southern slave states and not Prof. Martin, who was merely relaying the results of these two studies.

    P.S. Sometime in the future, I will attempt to re-upload the original reference materials as images that are more conducive to viewing.

  36. White Anglo Americans need to use self defense weapons that work, that are used not stockpiled in some safe. Guns aren’t really helping us now, not at all.

    Here’s a weapon I highly recommend:

    TV-B-Gone

    it’s a small device that zaps of all the TVs in the room.

    I’m a member of an expensive Chicago sports club. The main owner – yes Jewish, insists on playing CNN on large screens everywhere. I an seemingly most of the members can’t stand be forced to watch this lying propaganda, which is now 24/7 bashing Trump and Trump supporters, spreading fake hate crime hoaxes.

    I complained to management, they said, it’s the Jewish boss, owners call.

    So I’m zapping his TVs.

    TV-B-Gone

    http://www.tvbgone.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tim Groves
    If the TV policy bothers you so much, why are you still a member of this club?

    Nothing says "I object to this policy" like a resignation.
  37. @Kyle McKenna
    You can carry on about "The Jews" all you want, and many (or even all) of your observations may indeed be accurate. But until you own a meaningful part of the indoctrination apparatus, AKA MSM, your pleadings will forever be ineffectual.

    We have no shortage of people willing to "face the issue" and no shortage of people in full command of the facts. But facts are next to irrelevant when your opponent holds what Steve Sailer calls "the Megaphone".

    What are you going to do about that? Because it's really the only thing that matters. So long as your opponent holds a virtual monopoly upon what I call "the production of truth" your road will remain rough and relatively untraveled. The stranglehold upon the mass media is where--you might say--the rubber meets that road.

    “So long as your opponent holds a virtual monopoly upon what I call “the production of truth” your road will remain rough and relatively untraveled.”

    Corrected for accuracy –> The mainstream and alternative medias are involved in a war involving “the production of truth”, with each side claiming their opponent is engaging in “fake news stories” and “alternative facts”. In reality, both sides generate stories that contain elements of truth. It is up to an intelligent audience to read multiple stories from several sources, filter out the confirmation bias and wild generalizations, and generate their own conclusions. This task is monumentally difficult given how both groups demand to control the narrative for the public.

    Read More
    • Replies: @res
    I'm curious, Corvinus, do you consider an elephant and an ant to be of equivalent size? That seems like an appropriate comparison for the relative size/impact of the mainstream and alternative media. Not to mention that there are many types of alternative media so that side is not generating a consistent message.

    P.S. In case anyone is keeping track, that would be an example of the false equivalence fallacy.
  38. @CanSpeccy

    But facts are next to irrelevant when your opponent holds what Steve Sailer calls “the Megaphone”.
     
    It has always been understood that democracy is impossible without a free press. America has a mainstream media controlled by about six people (who have little if any sympathy for the fast declining Euro-American majority), which indicates that whatever is the proper description of the American government, it is not democratic.

    Some hold that the so-called "alt media" constitute a free press, but ten million bloggers opinionating without significant investigative resources does not an informed press make.

    Donald Trump may have made a laughing stock of the Republicrat duopoly's chosen presidential candidates, and exposed the NY Times, WaPo and the rest of the MSM for the lying shysters they really are. But pretty certainly he'll achieve no fundamental change in the trajectory of American decline, demoralization, and disintegration. He will not break up the media oligopoly, he will not outlaw PC curbs on free speech, he will not make the social and economic changes to American society necessary to revive the fertility of the EuroAmerican population.

    Trump will just go on bombing the shit out of people in far away countries about which Americans know nothing, funneling obscene amounts of taxpayers' money to the MIC, and taking care of his friends on Wall St.

    “Some hold that the so-called “alt media” constitute a free press, but ten million bloggers opinionating without significant investigative resources does not an informed press make.”

    Ye of little faith. These millions of bloggers have clearly demonstrated their investigative chops. They are informed about the world that they see…from their own perspective. The Alt Media is alive and well.

    “he will not make the social and economic changes to American society necessary to revive the fertility of the EuroAmerican population.”

    American whites have and will continue to make their own decisions as to who they will marry and procreate with. They need not be constantly badgered by you regarding their “duty” to increase the “EuroAmerican” population, as it is their liberty to have or not have children that are white or mixed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @epochehusserl
    will american whites have the same freedom to not associate with minorities who dont pay for their own children? My Chinese landlord said it best, blacks are like a locust plague. What we can do is enjoy the decline and celebrate dysgenic fertility with song and dance.
  39. @Robert Dunn
    Even if the white race were humiliated to the level of Germany after WWI the solution would still be the same: The one that refuses to fight back deserves extinction! And all the steps taken from that point to the eventual glorification of that nation would need to be followed here. The nationalism and anti-globalism of Donald Trump is a good first step. Obviously much remains to be done but for each of us with ethnic ties to Europe the ability to defend oneself is paramount. Be glad Hillary didn't win with her gun-grabbing anti-White agenda!

    “Even if the white race were humiliated to the level of Germany after WWI the solution would still be the same: The one that refuses to fight back deserves extinction!”

    First, you assume all white people are being humiliated.

    Second, how are YOU fighting back? What specific things are you doing to ensure you don’t become extinct?

    Third, are you proposing that if a white person doesn’t “fight back” in the manner you prescribe that they should become “extinct”? If yes, are you not playing God in this particular circumstance?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Robert Dunn
    If you were to actually read my post I said IF white people were subjected to the SAME humiliations as Germany was after WWI ...... See? It's a hypothetical! Well, Hitler's response to the obvious attempt to foment a Communist revolution in Germany as what was happening in Russia at the same time, was to gird the German people for a battle a war of survival!! And such, I believe, to be very necessary for our time when cultural Marxists have decided to wage war against white people as the above story typifies. And yes, Adolf Hitler DID SAY whoever is not willing to fight against the forces aligned against Germany's survival deserve to perish in the inevitable conquest of Germany by the banksters, communists, whatever!! That statement rallied the Germans to support Hitler and prevented (to put it mildly) Germany collapsing to Jewish Bolshevism!!
  40. The only way to win this is through actual war. Nothing less is going to make any difference.

    Read More
  41. @fnn
    A cry for help by Gavin McInnes?:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aJGEOOwzEg

    Gavin McInnes thinks that because other genocides have happened, we shouldn’t dwell on the holocaust as much. I’m not Jewish or white, but its painfully obvious that people dwell on past atrocities to make sure that their descendants never let it happen again.

    Plenty of atrocities and genocides have occurred, this cannot be denied. The way in which the descendants of those who were killed honor and remember their fallen, is completely up to them. If the Russians aren’t as outward in the remembrance of their fallen, that’s completely on them. Simply, you have no authority to dictate the way in which a people commemorate the lives of their dead.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    People can commemorate their dead any way they want, that's not in dispute. What they can't do is expect other peoples to pay homage to their myths as well.
  42. @Corvinus
    "Some hold that the so-called “alt media” constitute a free press, but ten million bloggers opinionating without significant investigative resources does not an informed press make."

    Ye of little faith. These millions of bloggers have clearly demonstrated their investigative chops. They are informed about the world that they see...from their own perspective. The Alt Media is alive and well.

    "he will not make the social and economic changes to American society necessary to revive the fertility of the EuroAmerican population."

    American whites have and will continue to make their own decisions as to who they will marry and procreate with. They need not be constantly badgered by you regarding their "duty" to increase the "EuroAmerican" population, as it is their liberty to have or not have children that are white or mixed.

    will american whites have the same freedom to not associate with minorities who dont pay for their own children? My Chinese landlord said it best, blacks are like a locust plague. What we can do is enjoy the decline and celebrate dysgenic fertility with song and dance.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "will american whites have the same freedom to not associate with minorities who dont pay for their own children?"

    Public tax dollars are used for the public. You have the liberty as a white person NOT to pay taxes. Now, those people who work, whites and non-whites, pay for their children to attend school.
  43. @Corvinus
    “They jumped all over Louis Farrakhan for mistakenly saying Jews owned 75% of the slaves when he meant to say 75% of Jewish households owned slaves.”

    People jumped all over him for insisting that a Jewish historian agreed with one of his conclusions. That Jewish historian took him to task, stating that he disagreed! And it was Martin, one of Farrakhan’s friends, who claimed that Farrakhan misspoke.

    “Then they jumped on Prof. Martin for saying 75% of Jewish households owned slaves without further clarifying that this statistic applied to the Jews of the South, and not nationwide.”

    No, only Jews in three southern particular cities in 1820! Martin misrepresented the statistic. Do you not get that through your head?

    You got absolutely destroyed on another thread, then decide to come here to make the same bogus claims. Martin claimed that statistic to be nationwide, but in reality was local. Since he misinformed his audience on this particular point, it has lead people to doubt his other claims, as evident by the refutations I provided that you have yet to address in a previous thread.

    “While Rosenwaike states that "probably two-fifths of the Jewish families of 1820 owned slaves," the information in his tables (see below) suggest the number was more like 46%:”

    [Laughs] Did you not state on a previous thread that it is “relatively trivial thing to challenge a particular statistic ( i.e., 70%), as there are a number of assumptions upon which this statistic is based that are easily assailable”? And didn’t I say that the proportion of slaveholders has never been an accurate measure of the social or economic importance of slaveholding, unless it is assessed on a broadly regional or state-by-state basis? Would not purchasing slaves be a sign of one’s ethnic display of superiority or because of the family’s wealth, or both?

    While there is merit to Martin’s work, there are also significant holes in his scholarship, as several sources I have offered indicate in a previous thread, which you still have yet to make any substantial remarks about. Interesting, to say the least.

    For example, Junius Rodriguez (The Historical Encyclopedia of World Slavery, Volume 1, ABC-CLIO, 1997) referenced…

    “A few Jews even became prominent slave owning planters in the Old South…as successful as these Jewish Southerners were by Southern standards, they represent a very tiny percentage of the 20,000 Jews residing in the antebellum South who could, or would, ever aspire to own a slave. About 5,000 Jews owned one or more slaves – about 1.25 percent of all the slaveowners in the antebellum South…For those Jews who did own slaves, the records demonstrate that they were not significantly different from other masters in their treatments of their bondsmen.”

    Note that the antebellum period covers the period before the Civil War, 1820-1860.

    Regardless of factual accuracy, some would argue that these numbers are meaningless since they neglect to account for any other difference in demographics besides religion. For example, poorer families were less likely to own slaves than wealthier families.

    If we account for all other factors, it ends up there is no statistically significant difference between Jews and the overall population in terms of slave ownership, especially since levels of slave ownership varied in the southern states and in southern cities. For example, this source (forward.com/articles/205455/slaves-of-charleston/?p=all) notes that in 1830 the proportion of Jewish residents of Charleston who owned slaves was similar to that of the general white population (83% versus 87%).

    If we account for all other factors, it ends up there is no statistically significant difference between Jews and the overall population in terms of slave ownership, especially since levels of slave ownership varied in the southern states and in southern cities.

    It turns out that the original Jewish sources referenced in TSR are silent about slavery and the overall population. Here’s what I mean.

    After managing to get my hands on the primary sources referenced in TSR, I now have a better understanding of what Rosenwaike was driving at in the following quote from p. 130 of TSR:

    Rosenwaike, whose Jewish population studies have been published in the major Jewish historical journals, has recently analyzed the 1971 population studies of Lee Soltow. Rosenwaike does not dispute Soltow’s startling findings:

    “Soltow estimates that 36 percent of the 625,000 families in the South in 1830 were slaveholders. Of the 322 household heads identified in the present study as [Jewish] residents of the same states at this enumeration, a considerably larger proportion – 75 percent – were owners of one or more slaves.”

    In order to do an apples to apples comparison with the data presented in Soltow’s study, Rosenwaike dropped New York and Pennsylvania (non-slavery states in 1830) as both of these states were not part of the 14 Southern slave states included in Soltow’s analysis.

    Here are the two key statistics Soltow presented on Table 1 of his study, Economic Inequality in the US:

    Slaveholders = 224,000
    Families in South = 625,000

    Slaveholder proportion = 36%

    What is important to note is the title Soltow attached to this table: Table 1, THE DISTRIBUTION OF SLAVES AMONG SLAVEHOLDERS IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1830, 1850, and 1860

    He did not title it: Table 1, THE DISTRIBUTION OF SLAVES AMONG SLAVEHOLDERS IN THE SOUTHERN UNITED STATES IN 1830, 1850, and 1860

    Further, on p. 826, Soltow elaborates on his methodology:

    The earliest census data for which all manuscripts are extant is the year 1830. I have drawn a random sample of families of size 6,911 from the microfilm of the 14 states (and the District of Columbia) which effectively had slavery.6

    Footnote 6: The 14 states and the District of Columbia include Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia.

    And should there be any doubt about the quality of his work as a demographer, here’s how one scholar summed up Rosenwaike’s On The Edge of Greatness:

    We owe much to conscientious historical demographers such as Ira Rosenwaike, whose Population History of New York City (1972) is of lasting value for urban and ethnic history. In the present work [i.e., On The Edge of Greatness] Rosenwaike uses his skills to wring from the census of 1830 a statistical profile of American Jewry before the great migration of German Jews, who in the next decades were to alter the character of Jewish life. This work exceeds simple compilation, since the census provides no clues regarding religion. By using various public and religious records, Rosenwaike has succeeded in identifying 629 Jewish households with some four thousand members, about whom he fashioned fifty statistical tables relating to such matters as the origins of household heads (a substantial majority were foreign born), age and sex ratios (roughly similar to those of urban Gentiles), the number of Jewish slaveholders (a majority of the 322 southern households that Rosenwaike studied owned slaves), and the occupations of Jews in the major cities. – Review of Books. Edward K. Spann (Indiana State University), p. 986

    So, on the basis of the information presented in these two Jewish sources, Prof. Martin was indeed correct when he said “75% of Jewish households owned slaves” or “more than twice as many Jews owned slaves as compared to whites (36%),” as these statistics were drawn from Ira Rosenwaike’s analysis that attempted to do an apples-to-apples comparison with Lee Soltow’s study, which focused on the 14 Southern slave states. It should be noted that it was these two Jewish scholars that decided to base their comparisons on the 14 Southern slave states and not Prof. Martin, who was merely relaying the results of these two studies.

    P.S. Sometime in the future, I will attempt to re-upload the original reference materials as images that are more conducive to viewing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    P.S. Sometime in the future, I will attempt to re-upload the original reference materials as images that are more conducive to viewing.
     
    Hopefully, these images should be much more conducive to viewing:

    http://imgur.com/7cFbAJH

    http://imgur.com/LRMyos1

    http://imgur.com/ekbOBFG

    http://imgur.com/uvDDklT

    http://imgur.com/l4YzjFU

    http://imgur.com/rCXIhP8

    , @iffen
    I'm impressed, geo.

    I think that you proved your point.

    Now if we could just get you back from the dark side.
    , @Malla
    Major Jewish involvement in the trans Atlantic Slavery is already well known

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yWCzTQemI4

    For example the slave markets in Brazil were closed on Saturdays, the Jewish day of rest.

  44. “Looking at developments in Russia during and after the Revolution, it seems quite possible that America may experience the same trajectory.”

    Well actually it is kinda happening. Have you heard about the black on white crime? Crime which is widely out of proportion and one excuse that SPLC had to explain was “black people attack whites is all because they have money” in other words when whites are getting murdered its all the faults of white people. So it’s not like Russia 1917 but it is happening.

    Read More
  45. @Corvinus
    "So long as your opponent holds a virtual monopoly upon what I call “the production of truth” your road will remain rough and relatively untraveled."

    Corrected for accuracy --> The mainstream and alternative medias are involved in a war involving "the production of truth", with each side claiming their opponent is engaging in "fake news stories" and "alternative facts". In reality, both sides generate stories that contain elements of truth. It is up to an intelligent audience to read multiple stories from several sources, filter out the confirmation bias and wild generalizations, and generate their own conclusions. This task is monumentally difficult given how both groups demand to control the narrative for the public.

    I’m curious, Corvinus, do you consider an elephant and an ant to be of equivalent size? That seems like an appropriate comparison for the relative size/impact of the mainstream and alternative media. Not to mention that there are many types of alternative media so that side is not generating a consistent message.

    P.S. In case anyone is keeping track, that would be an example of the false equivalence fallacy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "I’m curious, Corvinus, do you consider an elephant and an ant to be of equivalent size? That seems like an appropriate comparison for the relative size/impact of the mainstream and alternative media."

    Had you paid closer attention, I clearly stated both are equal to the task in how they indoctrinate their viewers and work toward getting their message out to the public. Their impact is decidedly similar in this regard.

    "Not to mention that there are many types of alternative media so that side is not generating a consistent message."

    Regardless, they use the same methods as the mainstream to push their agenda.
  46. @Corvinus
    "Even if the white race were humiliated to the level of Germany after WWI the solution would still be the same: The one that refuses to fight back deserves extinction!"

    First, you assume all white people are being humiliated.

    Second, how are YOU fighting back? What specific things are you doing to ensure you don't become extinct?

    Third, are you proposing that if a white person doesn't "fight back" in the manner you prescribe that they should become "extinct"? If yes, are you not playing God in this particular circumstance?

    If you were to actually read my post I said IF white people were subjected to the SAME humiliations as Germany was after WWI …… See? It’s a hypothetical! Well, Hitler’s response to the obvious attempt to foment a Communist revolution in Germany as what was happening in Russia at the same time, was to gird the German people for a battle a war of survival!! And such, I believe, to be very necessary for our time when cultural Marxists have decided to wage war against white people as the above story typifies. And yes, Adolf Hitler DID SAY whoever is not willing to fight against the forces aligned against Germany’s survival deserve to perish in the inevitable conquest of Germany by the banksters, communists, whatever!! That statement rallied the Germans to support Hitler and prevented (to put it mildly) Germany collapsing to Jewish Bolshevism!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "And such, I believe, to be very necessary for our time when cultural Marxists have decided to wage war against white people as the above story typifies."

    This notion that cultural Marxists run amok and are intellectually sterilizing whites is poppycock.

    "And yes, Adolf Hitler DID SAY whoever is not willing to fight against the forces aligned against Germany’s survival deserve to perish in the inevitable conquest of Germany by the banksters, communists, whatever!!"

    I'm not talking about Hitler. Do YOU support the idea that if a white person doesn't "fight back" in the manner you prescribe that they should become "extinct"?
  47. @epochehusserl
    will american whites have the same freedom to not associate with minorities who dont pay for their own children? My Chinese landlord said it best, blacks are like a locust plague. What we can do is enjoy the decline and celebrate dysgenic fertility with song and dance.

    “will american whites have the same freedom to not associate with minorities who dont pay for their own children?”

    Public tax dollars are used for the public. You have the liberty as a white person NOT to pay taxes. Now, those people who work, whites and non-whites, pay for their children to attend school.

    Read More
    • Replies: @epochehusserl
    Public tax dollars are used for the public. You have the liberty as a white person NOT to pay taxes. Now, those people who work, whites and non-whites, pay for their children to attend school.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    The illegitimacy in the black community is over 75 percent nationwide. Even if they work they are not net taxpayers. Many of these women are paid by the state to raise their own bastard children in daycare institutions. In an aristocratic government the state uses its resources to preserve the bloodlines of the elite. In a democratic government the state uses its resources to preserve the bloodlines of intergenerational welfare recipients. The welfare reform of 1996 didnt change anything, they merely expanded earned income credit. Public tax dollars are used to stop the mob from burning down civilization, nothing more. It would be more economically efficient to pay the average minority to drop out in the 7th grade and buy them an annuity and stop pretending that education matters. The other issue you never address Corvinus is the irony of blacks considering it outrageous to be considered inferior and then demanding lowered standards for their group.
  48. @res
    I'm curious, Corvinus, do you consider an elephant and an ant to be of equivalent size? That seems like an appropriate comparison for the relative size/impact of the mainstream and alternative media. Not to mention that there are many types of alternative media so that side is not generating a consistent message.

    P.S. In case anyone is keeping track, that would be an example of the false equivalence fallacy.

    “I’m curious, Corvinus, do you consider an elephant and an ant to be of equivalent size? That seems like an appropriate comparison for the relative size/impact of the mainstream and alternative media.”

    Had you paid closer attention, I clearly stated both are equal to the task in how they indoctrinate their viewers and work toward getting their message out to the public. Their impact is decidedly similar in this regard.

    “Not to mention that there are many types of alternative media so that side is not generating a consistent message.”

    Regardless, they use the same methods as the mainstream to push their agenda.

    Read More
  49. @Corvinus
    "will american whites have the same freedom to not associate with minorities who dont pay for their own children?"

    Public tax dollars are used for the public. You have the liberty as a white person NOT to pay taxes. Now, those people who work, whites and non-whites, pay for their children to attend school.

    Public tax dollars are used for the public. You have the liberty as a white person NOT to pay taxes. Now, those people who work, whites and non-whites, pay for their children to attend school.
    —————————————————————-
    The illegitimacy in the black community is over 75 percent nationwide. Even if they work they are not net taxpayers. Many of these women are paid by the state to raise their own bastard children in daycare institutions. In an aristocratic government the state uses its resources to preserve the bloodlines of the elite. In a democratic government the state uses its resources to preserve the bloodlines of intergenerational welfare recipients. The welfare reform of 1996 didnt change anything, they merely expanded earned income credit. Public tax dollars are used to stop the mob from burning down civilization, nothing more. It would be more economically efficient to pay the average minority to drop out in the 7th grade and buy them an annuity and stop pretending that education matters. The other issue you never address Corvinus is the irony of blacks considering it outrageous to be considered inferior and then demanding lowered standards for their group.

    Read More
  50. @geokat62

    If we account for all other factors, it ends up there is no statistically significant difference between Jews and the overall population in terms of slave ownership, especially since levels of slave ownership varied in the southern states and in southern cities.
     
    It turns out that the original Jewish sources referenced in TSR are silent about slavery and the overall population. Here's what I mean.

    After managing to get my hands on the primary sources referenced in TSR, I now have a better understanding of what Rosenwaike was driving at in the following quote from p. 130 of TSR:


    Rosenwaike, whose Jewish population studies have been published in the major Jewish historical journals, has recently analyzed the 1971 population studies of Lee Soltow. Rosenwaike does not dispute Soltow's startling findings:

    "Soltow estimates that 36 percent of the 625,000 families in the South in 1830 were slaveholders. Of the 322 household heads identified in the present study as [Jewish] residents of the same states at this enumeration, a considerably larger proportion - 75 percent - were owners of one or more slaves."
     

    In order to do an apples to apples comparison with the data presented in Soltow's study, Rosenwaike dropped New York and Pennsylvania (non-slavery states in 1830) as both of these states were not part of the 14 Southern slave states included in Soltow's analysis.

    Here are the two key statistics Soltow presented on Table 1 of his study, Economic Inequality in the US:

    Slaveholders = 224,000
    Families in South = 625,000

    Slaveholder proportion = 36%

    What is important to note is the title Soltow attached to this table: Table 1, THE DISTRIBUTION OF SLAVES AMONG SLAVEHOLDERS IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1830, 1850, and 1860

    He did not title it: Table 1, THE DISTRIBUTION OF SLAVES AMONG SLAVEHOLDERS IN THE SOUTHERN UNITED STATES IN 1830, 1850, and 1860

    Further, on p. 826, Soltow elaborates on his methodology:


    The earliest census data for which all manuscripts are extant is the year 1830. I have drawn a random sample of families of size 6,911 from the microfilm of the 14 states (and the District of Columbia) which effectively had slavery.6

    Footnote 6: The 14 states and the District of Columbia include Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia.
     

    And should there be any doubt about the quality of his work as a demographer, here's how one scholar summed up Rosenwaike's On The Edge of Greatness:

    We owe much to conscientious historical demographers such as Ira Rosenwaike, whose Population History of New York City (1972) is of lasting value for urban and ethnic history. In the present work [i.e., On The Edge of Greatness] Rosenwaike uses his skills to wring from the census of 1830 a statistical profile of American Jewry before the great migration of German Jews, who in the next decades were to alter the character of Jewish life. This work exceeds simple compilation, since the census provides no clues regarding religion. By using various public and religious records, Rosenwaike has succeeded in identifying 629 Jewish households with some four thousand members, about whom he fashioned fifty statistical tables relating to such matters as the origins of household heads (a substantial majority were foreign born), age and sex ratios (roughly similar to those of urban Gentiles), the number of Jewish slaveholders (a majority of the 322 southern households that Rosenwaike studied owned slaves), and the occupations of Jews in the major cities. - Review of Books. Edward K. Spann (Indiana State University), p. 986
     
    So, on the basis of the information presented in these two Jewish sources, Prof. Martin was indeed correct when he said "75% of Jewish households owned slaves" or "more than twice as many Jews owned slaves as compared to whites (36%)," as these statistics were drawn from Ira Rosenwaike's analysis that attempted to do an apples-to-apples comparison with Lee Soltow's study, which focused on the 14 Southern slave states. It should be noted that it was these two Jewish scholars that decided to base their comparisons on the 14 Southern slave states and not Prof. Martin, who was merely relaying the results of these two studies.

    P.S. Sometime in the future, I will attempt to re-upload the original reference materials as images that are more conducive to viewing.

    P.S. Sometime in the future, I will attempt to re-upload the original reference materials as images that are more conducive to viewing.

    Hopefully, these images should be much more conducive to viewing:

    View post on imgur.com

    View post on imgur.com

    View post on imgur.com

    View post on imgur.com

    View post on imgur.com

    View post on imgur.com

    Read More
  51. @jack ryan
    White Anglo Americans need to use self defense weapons that work, that are used not stockpiled in some safe. Guns aren't really helping us now, not at all.

    Here's a weapon I highly recommend:

    TV-B-Gone

    it's a small device that zaps of all the TVs in the room.

    I'm a member of an expensive Chicago sports club. The main owner - yes Jewish, insists on playing CNN on large screens everywhere. I an seemingly most of the members can't stand be forced to watch this lying propaganda, which is now 24/7 bashing Trump and Trump supporters, spreading fake hate crime hoaxes.

    I complained to management, they said, it's the Jewish boss, owners call.

    So I'm zapping his TVs.

    TV-B-Gone

    http://www.tvbgone.com

    If the TV policy bothers you so much, why are you still a member of this club?

    Nothing says “I object to this policy” like a resignation.

    Read More
  52. @Mulegino1
    No appreciable awakening to the menace of organized international Jewry will ever happen without:

    A. The acknowledgement that the "Holocaust" was a figment of Allied propaganda and never took place. While the Jews were subject to some harshly repressive measures under the Third Reich after the war against the Soviet Union began, there never was a plan to murder the Jews of Europe. The "gas chambers" were a badly crafted hoax and any suffering the Jews experienced can only be seen within the context of the total war that was raging all over Europe, and was in all likelihood milder than that of the non-Jewish non-combatants of the belligerents.

    As long as the religion of the Shoah Business remains sacrosanct in the west, international Jewry can continue to shame and beat down the gentiles using the all purpose verbal bludgeon of "antisemitism" and the "6 million" to intimidate them into silence. The myth of the "Holocaust" must be exorcised from the western mind if we desire to be truly free and independent.

    B. The demythologization of the Second World War. It was not a "good war." It was initiated - primarily by the British War Party, the FDR administration, and international Zionism -and fought with the destruction of nationalist Germany and its independent economy in mind. The war had absolutely nothing to do with "Nazi aggression" seeing as Great Britain, the U.S. and the USSR had a much worse track record of territorial aggrandizement and bellicosity than Germany.

    C. The vastly preponderant role of international Jewry in bringing about the Bolshevik Revolution and its hideous, murderous consequences must become common knowledge. The hugely disproportionate Jewish role in the early Soviet governments, not to mention in the Soviet secret police and the construction and administration of the Gulag must cease to be a well kept secret known only to a very few.

    Great comment as usual. I would only add to B), Polish intransigence. Now, as then, Poles seem happy to be cannon fodder for the US-Anglo-Zionist war machine. I just don’t get it.

    Read More
  53. @Wes
    Gavin McInnes thinks that because other genocides have happened, we shouldn't dwell on the holocaust as much. I'm not Jewish or white, but its painfully obvious that people dwell on past atrocities to make sure that their descendants never let it happen again.

    Plenty of atrocities and genocides have occurred, this cannot be denied. The way in which the descendants of those who were killed honor and remember their fallen, is completely up to them. If the Russians aren't as outward in the remembrance of their fallen, that's completely on them. Simply, you have no authority to dictate the way in which a people commemorate the lives of their dead.

    People can commemorate their dead any way they want, that’s not in dispute. What they can’t do is expect other peoples to pay homage to their myths as well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wes
    They can expect whatever they wish, though that doesn't mean you have to pay homage in their expected manner, or at all.

    I don't see the point of complaining about someone else's expectations, if they're not your employer or significant other. Who gives a f*ck?
  54. @Beefcake the Mighty
    People can commemorate their dead any way they want, that's not in dispute. What they can't do is expect other peoples to pay homage to their myths as well.

    They can expect whatever they wish, though that doesn’t mean you have to pay homage in their expected manner, or at all.

    I don’t see the point of complaining about someone else’s expectations, if they’re not your employer or significant other. Who gives a f*ck?

    Read More
  55. @geokat62

    If we account for all other factors, it ends up there is no statistically significant difference between Jews and the overall population in terms of slave ownership, especially since levels of slave ownership varied in the southern states and in southern cities.
     
    It turns out that the original Jewish sources referenced in TSR are silent about slavery and the overall population. Here's what I mean.

    After managing to get my hands on the primary sources referenced in TSR, I now have a better understanding of what Rosenwaike was driving at in the following quote from p. 130 of TSR:


    Rosenwaike, whose Jewish population studies have been published in the major Jewish historical journals, has recently analyzed the 1971 population studies of Lee Soltow. Rosenwaike does not dispute Soltow's startling findings:

    "Soltow estimates that 36 percent of the 625,000 families in the South in 1830 were slaveholders. Of the 322 household heads identified in the present study as [Jewish] residents of the same states at this enumeration, a considerably larger proportion - 75 percent - were owners of one or more slaves."
     

    In order to do an apples to apples comparison with the data presented in Soltow's study, Rosenwaike dropped New York and Pennsylvania (non-slavery states in 1830) as both of these states were not part of the 14 Southern slave states included in Soltow's analysis.

    Here are the two key statistics Soltow presented on Table 1 of his study, Economic Inequality in the US:

    Slaveholders = 224,000
    Families in South = 625,000

    Slaveholder proportion = 36%

    What is important to note is the title Soltow attached to this table: Table 1, THE DISTRIBUTION OF SLAVES AMONG SLAVEHOLDERS IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1830, 1850, and 1860

    He did not title it: Table 1, THE DISTRIBUTION OF SLAVES AMONG SLAVEHOLDERS IN THE SOUTHERN UNITED STATES IN 1830, 1850, and 1860

    Further, on p. 826, Soltow elaborates on his methodology:


    The earliest census data for which all manuscripts are extant is the year 1830. I have drawn a random sample of families of size 6,911 from the microfilm of the 14 states (and the District of Columbia) which effectively had slavery.6

    Footnote 6: The 14 states and the District of Columbia include Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia.
     

    And should there be any doubt about the quality of his work as a demographer, here's how one scholar summed up Rosenwaike's On The Edge of Greatness:

    We owe much to conscientious historical demographers such as Ira Rosenwaike, whose Population History of New York City (1972) is of lasting value for urban and ethnic history. In the present work [i.e., On The Edge of Greatness] Rosenwaike uses his skills to wring from the census of 1830 a statistical profile of American Jewry before the great migration of German Jews, who in the next decades were to alter the character of Jewish life. This work exceeds simple compilation, since the census provides no clues regarding religion. By using various public and religious records, Rosenwaike has succeeded in identifying 629 Jewish households with some four thousand members, about whom he fashioned fifty statistical tables relating to such matters as the origins of household heads (a substantial majority were foreign born), age and sex ratios (roughly similar to those of urban Gentiles), the number of Jewish slaveholders (a majority of the 322 southern households that Rosenwaike studied owned slaves), and the occupations of Jews in the major cities. - Review of Books. Edward K. Spann (Indiana State University), p. 986
     
    So, on the basis of the information presented in these two Jewish sources, Prof. Martin was indeed correct when he said "75% of Jewish households owned slaves" or "more than twice as many Jews owned slaves as compared to whites (36%)," as these statistics were drawn from Ira Rosenwaike's analysis that attempted to do an apples-to-apples comparison with Lee Soltow's study, which focused on the 14 Southern slave states. It should be noted that it was these two Jewish scholars that decided to base their comparisons on the 14 Southern slave states and not Prof. Martin, who was merely relaying the results of these two studies.

    P.S. Sometime in the future, I will attempt to re-upload the original reference materials as images that are more conducive to viewing.

    I’m impressed, geo.

    I think that you proved your point.

    Now if we could just get you back from the dark side.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    Now if we could just get you back from the dark side.
     
    If by "the dark side" you mean those that think the invasion of Iraq was a war of aggression, a crime under the customary international law, then I am proudly a member.

    Lest we forget, here is how IMTN characterized a war of aggression:

    In the judgment of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, "War is essentially an evil thing. Its consequences are not confined to the belligerent states alone, but affect the whole world. To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."Article 39 of the United Nations Charter provides that the UN Security Council shall determine the existence of any act of aggression and "shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security".

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_aggression
     
  56. @iffen
    I'm impressed, geo.

    I think that you proved your point.

    Now if we could just get you back from the dark side.

    Now if we could just get you back from the dark side.

    If by “the dark side” you mean those that think the invasion of Iraq was a war of aggression, a crime under the customary international law, then I am proudly a member.

    Lest we forget, here is how IMTN characterized a war of aggression:

    In the judgment of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, “War is essentially an evil thing. Its consequences are not confined to the belligerent states alone, but affect the whole world. To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”Article 39 of the United Nations Charter provides that the UN Security Council shall determine the existence of any act of aggression and “shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security”.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_aggression

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Article 39 of the United Nations Charter provides that the UN Security Council shall determine the existence of any act of aggression and “shall make recommendations

    You keep up with this sort of thing and I don't, but I missed the Article 39 action by the UN on the Iraq War.

  57. @geokat62

    Now if we could just get you back from the dark side.
     
    If by "the dark side" you mean those that think the invasion of Iraq was a war of aggression, a crime under the customary international law, then I am proudly a member.

    Lest we forget, here is how IMTN characterized a war of aggression:

    In the judgment of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, "War is essentially an evil thing. Its consequences are not confined to the belligerent states alone, but affect the whole world. To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."Article 39 of the United Nations Charter provides that the UN Security Council shall determine the existence of any act of aggression and "shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security".

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_aggression
     

    Article 39 of the United Nations Charter provides that the UN Security Council shall determine the existence of any act of aggression and “shall make recommendations

    You keep up with this sort of thing and I don’t, but I missed the Article 39 action by the UN on the Iraq War.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    ... but I missed the Article 39 action by the UN on the Iraq War.
     
    That episode illustrates the difference between theory and praxis to the highest degree.
  58. @iffen
    Article 39 of the United Nations Charter provides that the UN Security Council shall determine the existence of any act of aggression and “shall make recommendations

    You keep up with this sort of thing and I don't, but I missed the Article 39 action by the UN on the Iraq War.

    … but I missed the Article 39 action by the UN on the Iraq War.

    That episode illustrates the difference between theory and praxis to the highest degree.

    Read More
  59. Well the NWO guys have finally made their final intention clear, before the new world order takes over officially. Beige Power.

    A glimpse via their propaganda outlet, the Canadian CBC, into one of their important aim all along , having no pure White people around. White nationalists/ Nazi types have been saying this for years but no one took them seriously. But now the NWO are more open about their aims.

    Hey North East Asians, you guys are next, trust me on this.

    http://www.dailystormer.com/jewish-woman-responsible-for-half-negroid-miss-japan/

    Before the One World Govt takes over, no White or East Asian should be left alive in their pure state. Then they can rule over the future Brown Black masses forever.

    Under Communism they killed the best so they became the only best in the country. Now that concept is been taken to a Global level.

    Read More
  60. @geokat62

    If we account for all other factors, it ends up there is no statistically significant difference between Jews and the overall population in terms of slave ownership, especially since levels of slave ownership varied in the southern states and in southern cities.
     
    It turns out that the original Jewish sources referenced in TSR are silent about slavery and the overall population. Here's what I mean.

    After managing to get my hands on the primary sources referenced in TSR, I now have a better understanding of what Rosenwaike was driving at in the following quote from p. 130 of TSR:


    Rosenwaike, whose Jewish population studies have been published in the major Jewish historical journals, has recently analyzed the 1971 population studies of Lee Soltow. Rosenwaike does not dispute Soltow's startling findings:

    "Soltow estimates that 36 percent of the 625,000 families in the South in 1830 were slaveholders. Of the 322 household heads identified in the present study as [Jewish] residents of the same states at this enumeration, a considerably larger proportion - 75 percent - were owners of one or more slaves."
     

    In order to do an apples to apples comparison with the data presented in Soltow's study, Rosenwaike dropped New York and Pennsylvania (non-slavery states in 1830) as both of these states were not part of the 14 Southern slave states included in Soltow's analysis.

    Here are the two key statistics Soltow presented on Table 1 of his study, Economic Inequality in the US:

    Slaveholders = 224,000
    Families in South = 625,000

    Slaveholder proportion = 36%

    What is important to note is the title Soltow attached to this table: Table 1, THE DISTRIBUTION OF SLAVES AMONG SLAVEHOLDERS IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1830, 1850, and 1860

    He did not title it: Table 1, THE DISTRIBUTION OF SLAVES AMONG SLAVEHOLDERS IN THE SOUTHERN UNITED STATES IN 1830, 1850, and 1860

    Further, on p. 826, Soltow elaborates on his methodology:


    The earliest census data for which all manuscripts are extant is the year 1830. I have drawn a random sample of families of size 6,911 from the microfilm of the 14 states (and the District of Columbia) which effectively had slavery.6

    Footnote 6: The 14 states and the District of Columbia include Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia.
     

    And should there be any doubt about the quality of his work as a demographer, here's how one scholar summed up Rosenwaike's On The Edge of Greatness:

    We owe much to conscientious historical demographers such as Ira Rosenwaike, whose Population History of New York City (1972) is of lasting value for urban and ethnic history. In the present work [i.e., On The Edge of Greatness] Rosenwaike uses his skills to wring from the census of 1830 a statistical profile of American Jewry before the great migration of German Jews, who in the next decades were to alter the character of Jewish life. This work exceeds simple compilation, since the census provides no clues regarding religion. By using various public and religious records, Rosenwaike has succeeded in identifying 629 Jewish households with some four thousand members, about whom he fashioned fifty statistical tables relating to such matters as the origins of household heads (a substantial majority were foreign born), age and sex ratios (roughly similar to those of urban Gentiles), the number of Jewish slaveholders (a majority of the 322 southern households that Rosenwaike studied owned slaves), and the occupations of Jews in the major cities. - Review of Books. Edward K. Spann (Indiana State University), p. 986
     
    So, on the basis of the information presented in these two Jewish sources, Prof. Martin was indeed correct when he said "75% of Jewish households owned slaves" or "more than twice as many Jews owned slaves as compared to whites (36%)," as these statistics were drawn from Ira Rosenwaike's analysis that attempted to do an apples-to-apples comparison with Lee Soltow's study, which focused on the 14 Southern slave states. It should be noted that it was these two Jewish scholars that decided to base their comparisons on the 14 Southern slave states and not Prof. Martin, who was merely relaying the results of these two studies.

    P.S. Sometime in the future, I will attempt to re-upload the original reference materials as images that are more conducive to viewing.

    Major Jewish involvement in the trans Atlantic Slavery is already well known

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yWCzTQemI4

    For example the slave markets in Brazil were closed on Saturdays, the Jewish day of rest.

    Read More
  61. @Robert Dunn
    If you were to actually read my post I said IF white people were subjected to the SAME humiliations as Germany was after WWI ...... See? It's a hypothetical! Well, Hitler's response to the obvious attempt to foment a Communist revolution in Germany as what was happening in Russia at the same time, was to gird the German people for a battle a war of survival!! And such, I believe, to be very necessary for our time when cultural Marxists have decided to wage war against white people as the above story typifies. And yes, Adolf Hitler DID SAY whoever is not willing to fight against the forces aligned against Germany's survival deserve to perish in the inevitable conquest of Germany by the banksters, communists, whatever!! That statement rallied the Germans to support Hitler and prevented (to put it mildly) Germany collapsing to Jewish Bolshevism!!

    “And such, I believe, to be very necessary for our time when cultural Marxists have decided to wage war against white people as the above story typifies.”

    This notion that cultural Marxists run amok and are intellectually sterilizing whites is poppycock.

    “And yes, Adolf Hitler DID SAY whoever is not willing to fight against the forces aligned against Germany’s survival deserve to perish in the inevitable conquest of Germany by the banksters, communists, whatever!!”

    I’m not talking about Hitler. Do YOU support the idea that if a white person doesn’t “fight back” in the manner you prescribe that they should become “extinct”?

    Read More
  62. A white male can be accommodated by diversity system freaks, as long as he is a special kind of white male, a victim cult-supporting white male with the right identity:

    white male queer
    white male Jewish
    white male military Veteran
    white male Zionist
    white male Hispanic
    white male disabled
    white male Muslim

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
While other top brass played press agents for the administration’s war, William Odom told the truth about Iraq—though few listened.
A thousand years of meritocracy shaped the Middle Kingdom.