The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Nicholas Stix Archive
Never Again Action’s Communist Jews Want Open Borders to Wipe Out America—and Israel
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

So now, we learn from a fawning Buzzfeed, “young Jews” have founded Never Again Action [Tweet them] to condemn President Trump, call for the elimination of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and shut down those awful “concentration camps” for “migrants” at the southwest border—part, they claim of a new “Holocaust” [As The US Debates “Concentration Camps,” These Jews Are Trying To Actually Shut Them Down, by Julia Reinstein, July 20, 2019]. As a patriotic America-First Jew who supports Germany and Israel, I have been contemplating this sort of people intermittently for 18 years. Their claim isn’t just untrue. It’s off-the-chain insane—a blood libel on America.

The NAA’s Jews aren’t trying to stop a new Holocaust. They’re trying to start one, here, in the United States, by flooding the country with aliens from the Third World. This time, the victims will be Americans—the Historic American Nation. But what’s often missed: they would do the same to Israel if they could.

The NAA’s Jews, Buzzfeed didn’t report, aren’t so much Jewish as they are communists. That explains why they do what they do, including anti-American protests at which the activists shout “Never Again!” If people had demonstrated against the Nazis the way NAA is demonstrates against the evil racist Trump, they claim, the Holocaust would never have happened.

NAA’s activists have, of course, received the usual litany of laudatory editorials and reportorials in the Main Stream and Jewish media. [Inside the Jewish Effort to Stop ICE and Trump’s ‘Concentration Camps’ by Danielle Ziri, Haaretz, July 9, 2019; Want To ‘Send Omar Back’? That’s What The Nazis Did by Batya Ungar-Sargon, Forward, July 18, 2019.]

But before getting to the history of NAA’s origins and goals, let’s debunk this “concentration camp” tale. Mainstream Jewish groups rejected as trivializing the Holocaust when Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez spun it into the latest narrative to justify Open Borders. [These Jews called out AOC over her use of ‘concentration camps.’ Here’s what they think about the detention centers, by Ben Sales, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, July 8, 2019]

Remember, the foreign criminals held in border detention centers broke into our country and seek to steal it. We didn’t break their doors down and seize them in “Nacht und Nebel” (“night and fog”) actions. German and other European Jews, on the other hand, were hard-working citizens and taxpayers who served heroically in World War I. They just wanted to be left alone.

Don’t confuse the NAA Jews with the neoconservative Jews who favor immigration. Yes, those American Zionists hypocritically support Israel’s walls to keep out illegal aliens but demand open borders for America. Yes, they think its fine for Benjamin Netanyahu to call illegal aliens “infiltrators,” but a terrible sin for Donald Trump to call them “invaders.”

But, unlike the neocons, the NAA’s Jews cannot be accused of hypocrisy–they wish to destroy Israel and America. For that matter, they’d destroy the rest of the West, too.

Now, a little history of the NAA and its precursors.

In America, they supported the so-called Civil Rights movement. And they joined not just the “peace movement” during the war in Vietnam but became “war resisters” and joined the terrorist Weather Underground, a top leader of which was the Jewish Bernadine Dohrn. Now, that same crowd, two generations later, supports Open Borders and “immigrant rights,” along with the “Right to Resist” for black criminals; i.e., the “right” to wantonly commit crimes and then murder cops who try to stop them. They still hope to implement Leon Trotsky’s plans in 1939 to sow rebellion among blacks in the West, including, of course, the U.S.

And they’ll silence anyone who opposes them. In 2008, when Jewish communists who supported Obama demanded the right of return to Israel for Arabs, a Jewish socialist friend of mine who supports borders in America and Israel alike criticized them in his popular blog. The Reds terrorized him, tried to destroy him professionally, and forced him to permanently shut down his website.

Now, in conscripting the Holocaust into the war against immigration law, NAA is doing likewise. Those who oppose them are, by implication, Nazis

In Israel, for more than a generation, NAA’s ideological forebears have demanded a “one-state solution.” That means Jews and so-called Palestinians would live together under one government, including a “right of return” for Arabs who assert that their ancestors resided on the land of present-day Israel before 1948. Of course, Arabs would swamp the Jews, and bring about that democratic ideal they and the communists want: one man, one vote, one time. Then Holocaust II will begin in earnest.

My earliest encounters with such “Jews” was in 2002. Brooklyn-born Adam Shapiro, who was living in the “Palestinian” territories with his Arab “Christian” fiancé, Huwaida Arraf, disguised himself as a medic in a Red Crescent ambulance and surreptitiously entered the besieged Ramallah bunker of PLO terrorist Yasser Arafat. Seeing as Shapiro was in a terrorist front vehicle, he probably didn’t fool the Israeli Defense Force, but they let him pass anyway.

Afterward, Shapiro and Arraf feverishly worked the phones back to New York, depicting himself as having been “trapped” in the terrorist’s compound.

He claimed to be a Jew who renounced Judaism, a simple pacifist and humanitarian, but I proved that he supported wanton Arab terror as long as the victims were Jews. [A Jewish Nazi? The Adam Shapiro Story, by Nicholas Stix, Toogood Reports, April 13, 2002]

Point is, NAA wants to do to America what Shapiro tried to do to Israel Thus they are joined by today’s most influential Jewish Leftist organizations: Jewish Voice for Peace, founded in 1996, and BDS(“Boycotts, Divestment, Sanctions”), founded in 2001.

Those outfits have created a peculiar anti-Jewish political “theology,” as Joshua Muravchik wrote in the neocon flagship, Commentary:

Palestinian activist Linda Sarsour…used the platform provided by JVP to offer instruction on the meaning of Judaism. She opined that “being pro-Palestinian … is foundational to Judaism’ because ‘wanting freedom and justice for Palestinians … reflects the teachings of Judaism, which focuses on uplifting the oppressed. …”

In 2017, JVP circulated a list of four groups of victims whose names were to be read aloud [in observance of Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the year for Jews]: black men and women killed by police … people killed in the 2016 bombing of the Istanbul airport … people killed while dancing at Pulse nightclub … trans women of color murdered in 2015/16.

For Passover, JVP has published its own Haggadah, the guide to the seder held in Jewish homes. It begins with a dedication to “intersectionality,” exhorting participants to “find moments of fierce righteous rage that motivate you to re-commit to local and national organizing.”

[Not so Jewish, Not for Peace: How Jewish Voice for Peace Falsifies Judaism and Glorifies Terrorism. A Deep Dive by Joshua Muravchik, March 2019]

Note, however, that JVP and BDS, while in effect anti-Semitic like NAA, insist that they are motivated by Jewish teaching. To them, Judaism is a suicide pact, as is the U.S. Constitution. Evan Feldberg-Bannatyne, 21, a student at Earlham College in Indiana and NAA’s chief fundraiser, explained it for Buzzfeed’s Reinstein: “This is really how I practice my Judaism — through social justice.”

That teaching just happens to coincide with the aims of the three top supporters of BDS in the House of Representatives, all of whom voted against the recent resolution condemning the BDS movement: Muslims Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, and, of course, New York’s Ocasio-Cortez, also widely known as Occasional-Cortex [Here Are The 17 Members Of Congress Who Voted Against Condemning BDS, by Aiden Pink, Forward, July 24, 2019]

Anyway, whenever you hear a Jew invoke “social justice,” you know that his real religion is Marxism. Just as JVP and BDS would flood Israel with Arabs to kill off that country’s Jews, the same people and their racial socialist allies would flood America with Third Worlders to kill off the Historic American Nation.

And we can’t, despite what NAA would have you believe about Trump’s “concentration camps,” depend on Republicans to stop it. An analogy from history: In 1954, it was a Republican senator from Vermont, Ralph Flanders, who introduced the resolution to censure American patriot Joe McCarthy and stop his tenacious fight against domestic communism and Reds in government.

Similarly, today’s neocons, having pushed all rivals out of the Conservative Movement, have eliminated all those actually willing to fight the Jewish communists aiming to destroy America. Republicans aren’t likely to buck them—any more than California’s GOP were able to resist immigration even after the clarion call of Proposition 187.

There is no gentle way of dealing with these people. They are bereft of decency and immune to reason. As the late novelist Mary McCarthy might quip, every word they say is a lie, including “and” and “the.”

That includes, of course, the false claims of “concentration camps” that they’re using to push for open borders under the guise of a fight against Hitler.

But that isn’t who they’re fighting. They’re fighting us. It’s anti-Jews vs. Jews, and, for the Historic American Nation, anti-Americans vs. Americans.

Nicholas Stix [email him] is a New York City-based journalist and researcher, much of whose work focuses on the nexus of race, crime, and education. He spent much of the 1990s teaching college in New York and New Jersey. His work has appeared in Chronicles, The New York Post, Weekly Standard, Daily News, New York Newsday, American Renaissance, Academic Questions, Ideas on Liberty and many other publications. Stix was the project director and principal author of the NPI report, The State of White America-2007. He blogs at Nicholas Stix, Uncensored.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 9 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Blake says:

    You support a racist settler colony do you?! Well humanity support justice.

    • Replies: @Nicholas Stix
  2. The author speaks of the attempt to flood Israel with “Arabs”. Apparently he doesn’t know that the “Arabs”, or Palestinians come from Palestine. Palestine is their land and always was. This is a simple question: Palestinians are from Palestine. If they go to Palestine they are not flooding anything at all, but living in the lands that belong to them. Why doesn’t the author read a few serious books about such themes? The author also says that Jews in Palestine (who were not invited by anyone to live in Palestine) cannot live together with Palestinians. Why does he think in that case that Americans in the US should have to live together with Jews?

    There is one p0int about which the author seems to be completely right: when he says that the purposes of Judaism don’t have anything to do with justice. He writes: “Anyway, whenever you hear a Jew invoke “social justice,” you know that his real religion is Marxism.”

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
    , @Nicholas Stix
  3. “There is no gentle way of dealing with these people. They are bereft of decency and immune to reason.”

    That’s a description of our whole Jewish Problem in a nutshell, isn’t it?

    Unfortunately, 2019 doesn’t do nuance:

    The 5% who are criminals define the black community.
    The .01% who are terrorists define the Muslim community.
    And the 25% who are Communists and anarchists define the Jewish community.

    I’m sure most of the people in these racial profiles are reasonably sane and cooperative. But I don’t care. These exonerations pale when we consider that pretty much 100% of violent urban crime is perpetrated by blacks; 100% of terrorism by Muslims; and 100% of American Communism by Jews.

    My life and my world would be much simpler without these three “diversity” components.

  4. @UncommonGround

    Actually, prior to the Zionists arriving, the Jews, Muslims and Christians got along just fine. Even a number of non-Zionist European Jews were ok with the way things were. It’s the Zionists that can’t live with anybody.
    https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/.premium-this-day-zionism-s-first-political-assassination-1.5288744

    • Agree: mark green
  5. Immigration brings some challenges, no doubt. And that does not happen only with people. Words migrate too, and that can be a stepping stone to “historic” English speakers. Take the word “fiancé’, for example. It comes from the French. Just as it happens in France, it is written differently for the two genders. The way I wrote it above, “fiancé”, with one “e”, is the masculine form. The feminine is “fiancée”. As one can see, that word did not “assimilate” in a friendly manner. Those immigrants…

    My point is: Huwaida Arraf, being a woman, should be referred to as Adam Shapiro’s fiancée, not fiancé.

    As for your article, enlighten me about a specific point. You condemn Hitler because he harmed “citizens and taxpayers”. But, according to your line of reasoning, it was okay for other countries (America included) to bar the entrance of those “citizens and taxpayers” fleeing Hitler. Is that right?

  6. @Blake

    “Justice”: A euphemism for Holocaust II?

    I see you are also not on speaking terms with English grammar.

  7. @UncommonGround

    There is no such place as “Palestine.”

    You speak of places that don’t exist, lie about history, and then seek to draw moral conclusions from your fantasies and lies. You also lied about what I said.

    You’re not just a liar, but a stupid one. Why would I trust you to give me the correct time of day?

    • Replies: @UncommonGround
  8. I can’t accept Stix’s view that this anti-white, Jewish group, ‘Never Again Action’ (NAA), wants to eliminate Israel’s Jewish character with the same enthusiasm that they want to diminish white America. Having observed radical Jewish political activism for decades, that claim does not ring true.

    It’s evident that NAA hates White Americans, but I suspect that a good deal of their strident anti-Zionism is a ploy.

    The spectacle of anti-Zionist, ‘Jewish radicalism’ directed towards Israel by ‘communist’ Jews is a captivating pose. But it’s insincere. If it were sincere and viable, we would see similar manifestations of it inside Israel. Only it’s not there.

    In Israel there are no national leaders who advocate for the opening of Israel’s borders to waves of non-Jews or to even allow the many hundreds of thousands hapless gentiles who were born inside Israel to ever qualify as First Class citizens. This is raw and heartless Jewish supremacism. And it is no aberration.

    Jewish leaders of every political stripe have been grinding down and cleansing Israel of its native, non-Jewish population for over over 70 years.

    Jewish-branded ‘communism’ (radical egalitarianism) is simply Jewish make-believe. It’s designed to fool the goyim about how Jews view themselves within the human family.

    Jewish theology, after all, elevates Jews above the rest of mankind. Jews are instructed to see themselves as not only God’s ‘chosen people’, but as being innately superior to their non-Jewish neighbors. This view causes resentment. The jews understand this. But many Jews are secretly determined to see the fulfillment of Jewish prophecy, re-establish the Jewish kingdom, and ‘rule the nations’.

    The ostentatious and very Jewish hullabaloo created by NAA is designed to camouflage the Jewish commitment to advancing Jewish tribal interests while maintaining Jewish continuity (and Jewish power) via ethnocentric chicanery. The rest is theater.

    Deception has become a survival mechanism for Jews. After all, Jews outside of Israel have lived among the goyim as a distinct and separate people for centuries. This has caused tensions. Jewish loyalty to the host nation is often suspected to be lower than Jewish intra-tribal loyalty. What to do?

    Weaken the opposition.

    With the advent of civil rights legislation, racial set-asides, immigration quotas, and pro-diversity codes of speech and conduct, America’s white population is now expected to renounce all and any racial pride, eschew instinctive (white) racial preferences, and even reject the healthy and natural interest in preserving white racial continuity. Miscegenation for whites is suddently very cool.

    But is it?

    It isn’t for Jews. Israel never glamorizes romance between Jews and Arabs the way Jews in America glamorize romance between whites and blacks.

    Why the difference?

    The double standards are stark. They are also an outrage.

    But these double-standards are what Jews want and it’s what the Jews are getting.

    It’s official: White nationalism is abhorrent.

    It’s official: Jewish nationalism is precious.

    Public displays of ‘radical Jewish egalitarianism’ should therefore be viewed with extreme skepticism. Jews expect to remain exceptional while whites get downgraded to ‘nothing special’. These social privileges and policy differences will eventually have real and irreversible consequences.

    Will European-derived whites be allowed to manage and preserve their lineage as Jews do now?

    It’s a question worth asking.

  9. @Nicholas Stix

    I think exactly the same about you. The only difference is that I have a lot of historians on my side, including Israelis ones and I can make my case using arguments (in case you start a discussion, what you are not able to do, so I think that it’s you who are stupid). Of course Palestine doesn’t exist. It was destroyed by Jewish foreigners who conquered the place and expelled the rightfull owners. You are a fanatical right extremist. That’s all.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Nicholas Stix Comments via RSS