The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 James Kirkpatrick Archive
NATIONAL REVIEW, Conservatism Inc., Plan to Cave EVEN MORE On Immigration!
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
A tsunami is a natural phenomenon. Mass immigration is government policy. Credit: VDare.com.
A tsunami is a natural phenomenon. Mass immigration is government policy. Credit: VDare.com.

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Conservatives are fond of saying, “Being a liberal means never having to say you’re sorry.” Unfortunately, the same is true of Conservatism Inc. functionaries. They acknowledge conservatives are facing demographic extinction. They admit it is happening because of immigration. But they refuse to listen to the very people who warned them about this. Instead, they will continue skipping towards annihilation and drag the entire country with them.

Exhibit A: the recent cover story from National Review telling us, once again, how Republicans need to “adapt to a diversifying electorate or lose their influence” [Can the GOP Overcome Demographic Change in Red States, by Tim Alberta, [Email him]November 7 2016].

Incredibly, the hook of the story is the tale of an American couple who used to live in California before fleeing the state.

The state had been overrun, first by immigrants legal and illegal, their cultures and traditions in tow, and then by liberal politicians who seized control of the government by catering to these constituencies and turning their communities into Democratic garrisons. The state became majority-minority in 2001; whites are now 39 percent of its population and dwindling. In turn, the GOP is essentially extinct, representing conservative enclaves around California but irrelevant in statewide elections.

They fled to Arizona, but the same process of ethnic cleansing via mass immigration is underway there as well. So they are supporting Donald Trump in order to stop it.

Needless to say, author Alberta does not sympathize with their solution.

But Trump cannot deliver that; nobody can. The country will soon look very different. And the biggest contributor to that change—the single trend that could propel the GOP toward oblivion—is the ethnic diversification of the electorate.

Alberta’s brilliant suggestion: Republicans need to somehow win the votes of the very people this couple is fleeing from!

What makes this even more amazing is that Alberta acknowledges Republican failure to win a majority of non-white voters anywhere in the country.

He suggests there’s hope for Republicans in Texas. But as Steve Sailer has shown, the strong state identity and white bloc voting suggests Texas is a unique state, and even in this best-case example, Romney only won 37 percent of the Hispanic vote. Alberta also suggests Florida. But here too, it is older Cuban Hispanics who vote Republican, a declining demographic relative to the larger “Latino” community.

Alberta blandly blames the GOP for trying to “repel non-whites.” And as an example of someone who is doing the opposite and somehow winning over this demographic, Alberta points to…Paul Ryan!

Ryan, for example, has toured the nation’s poorest neighborhoods and met with community leaders to craft anti-poverty proposals, and has long been a supporter of comprehensive immigration reform.

original-25428-1398653661-3But this isn’t a new idea. It’s just another attempt at “Jack Kemp conservatism,” which spectacularly failed to win minority support or even enough white votes. And despite Ryan’s boasting about opposing Prop. 187, Hispanics don’t support Republicans who favor mass immigration. Even Alberta admits Ronald Reagan’s share of the Hispanic vote actually declined from 37 percent to 30 percent after he passed the nation-destroying 1986 Amnesty.

The central problem is something Alberta doesn’t mention at all, let alone confront. Non-whites do not want conservatism. They have nothing to gain from it. The black middle and upper classes (and its exemplars like Michelle Obama) are a creation of Affirmative Action. Hispanics favor liberal economic policies by larger margins than they favor more immigration. Arabs are eager to jettison their supposed “white privilege” so they can get government benefits too.

At some point, one of these Beltway Right shills has to show some evidence—anyevidence—that babbling about “enterprise zones” or an “opportunity society” actually wins over minority voters.

Why would any of these people want “limited government” when they can get handouts, privileged treatment and tributes to their tribal identities? Why would they want to assimilate to an “American” identity which is fundamentally a creation of European-Americans when they can receive more psychological and financial benefits from claiming they are the victims of racism and “white privilege?”

The demographic death spiral was not necessary. After all, Peter Brimelow warned conservatives (in National Review!) that it was “Time To Rethink Immigrationback in 1992. He and Edwin S. Rubenstein told conservatives “demography is destiny” and broke down exactly what i mmigration would do to the Reagan coalition in their 1997 “Electing A New People,” also a National Review cover story (!). But, as Brimelow noted when VDARE.com reposted the piece in 2000, the response was silence, without anyone even addressing the argument.

As we see from Alberta’s article, the silence continues when it comes to grappling with hard realities. William F. Buckley and the “movement” he created “simply did not have the energy or the courage to adapt to the next generation of issues” following the election of Ronald Reagan.

However, that “movement” was not idle when it came to purging the people who understood what was happening. Peter Brimelow, John O’Sullivan, Sam Francis,Patrick J. Buchanan and many others who accurately predicted what was coming were driven out of the Respectable Right. And Conservatism Inc. is left with people who not only won’t, but can’t intelligently interpret what is happening [The Intellectual Rot at the Heart of the Beltway Right, by Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, April 9, 2016].

Alberta expresses the deluded hope that conservatives can, contra Brimelow’s warning, prevent demographics from becoming destiny. In contrast, despite the silly rhetoric about “Stronger Together,” progressives are refreshingly frank about their desire to use engineered population transfers to ensure liberal hegemony. “Ensure demographics is destiny” is one of the major strategic objectives listed by John Podesta in a memo given to a group of liberal billionaires in late 2007 [Revealed: Liberal Money’s Longterm Strategy To Control Public Opinion And Secure ‘Advantageous’ Demographics, by Peter Hasson, Daily Caller, November 2, 2016].

Podesta boasts about an “emerging progressive majority” featuring “communities of color.” He confidently describes blacks as the Democrats’ “most reliable voting bloc” but speaks about Latinos in some detail. And, interestingly, he dismisses the mystical “Bush won 44 percent of the Hispanic vote” poll which many Beltway Right operatives evidently still believe.

Considered a swing group by many analysts, Latinos appear to have become much more Democratic over the Bush years. In the 2004 election, it was initially reported that they gave Bush 44 percent of their vote. However, the exit poll is now widely acknowledged to have been flawed and the generally accepted estimate is that Kerry carried Hispanics 58 percent compared to Bush’s 40 percent… Latino support for the Democrats appeared to go up substantially in 2006, with the group as a whole favoring Democrats by a 69 to 30 percent margin. The rapid increase in demographic importance of Latinos will continue for decades.

What can Conservatism Inc. do in response? Winning over minority voters with Paul Ryan-style strategies isn’t something that has never been tried: it has already been tried, and it failed.

But this demographic change is not a natural process. It’s the result of deliberate government policies and could be easily reversed. Even Mitt Romney acknowledged this with his fleeting reference to “self-deportation.” If conservatives want to save their movement, and the country, they need to change the demographic facts on the ground.

Of course, this is much harder than stopping America from becoming majority minority to begin with. But Conservatism Inc. wouldn’t listen. Now it has a much more serious challenge to deal with—one which will remain no matter how much wishful thinking Beltway hacks engage in. Still, acknowledging you have a problem is a first step towards solving it.

Perhaps at this late hour Conservatism Inc. could try heeding the warnings, and the proposed solutions, of those they cast into the outer darkness. If they don’t, conservatives, and the country, will face extinction. And they will have no one to blame but themselves.

A word to National Review. Don’t call it a grave. It’s the future you chose.

James Kirkpatrick [Email him] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 75 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. TJM says:

    This is the same politics, by the same people who have opened the borders in Europe, Zionist Jews.

    The destruction of the West. While Jews fight tooth and nail to open our borders, calling anyone who wishes secure borders a racist, yet in Israel a blood test is required for migration there.

    • Replies: @biz
    , @MMM
  2. You missed key points. One reason Trump support surged is because he denounced crazy neo-cons who infected the party. He opposed foreign wars and said our military budget was too large. He is also pro-choice and supports rational single-payer healthcare (Medicare for all), which is far better than Obamacare.

    He backtracked on these issues to appease Republican crazies, but this cost him support from the majority of Americans of all colors,. He is also reluctant to challenge the legal immigration rackets like H-1Bs, so called “skilled” workers.

    If Trump loses, a future Republican can openly support these populist issues and win support of most non-white Americans, since the corrupt Democrats will not.

    • Replies: @Greenstalk
    , @Alden
  3. Today’s establishment conservatives really are yesterday’s liberals. They follow the proto-neoliberal thinking of the mid to late 60s, when it was suggested that open borders and free trade would encourage the world to turn away from economic socialism and make everyone fall in love with American-style capitalism and democracy.

    Now America is filling up with third world socialists and is deeply in debt to the ex-socialist Chinese.

  4. If the people of color are with the Democrats and the white people are with Trump who will vote for conservatism inc.? The culture war is over. The conservatives lost. The GOPe has a populist leader now. The former leaders of the GOPe, if they would retain their place at court, can get with Trump or get with Hillary. Their only other alternative is to get a job.

  5. robt says:

    Well, first, this red/blue thing still gives me pause after 30 years – I have to stop and think. Republican used to be blue and the Democrats were reds. Somehow, magically that changed in the 1984 election (you can confirm that on YouTube if you look at news clips of the election ’80 and ’84 results), and it was like One Voice, with no comment or challenge. Apparently the Democrats didn’t want to be called Reds any more).
    Second, the demographic change as a result of population movements is like the occasional large movements in history that overwhelm nations, is unstoppable, was strategic insofar as the ‘these people vote liberal’ theory was a Democratic political plan to dominate, and is unstoppable because even if the influx decreases (but it will probably increase) the birth rate of the migrants is much higher – it’s just a numbers game, as the Victorians knew, and restricted immigration accordingly to preserve the national character. It wasn’t necessarily racist – it’s just that either you are overwhelmed and lose your country, or you’re not, and you keep your country. The Republican demise is just one symptom of this.
    Should Trump win, he would not be winning as a Republican (the Party hasn’t spent a penny on advertising for him, and to a large degree has campaigned against him), he would be winning as an iconoclast because enough people are fed up with the status quo. But it would be temporary, and the ‘liberal’ dominance would return – as long as the nation avoided bankruptcy anyway. Apparently National Review would approve of the One Party with Two Names policy anyway, something we essentially have now – though ordinary people would prefer a choice despite what the ‘leaders’ propose as the policy of the official Republican party.
    Thanks to Kennedy’s immigration bill in the mid-’60s, the fate of the US was sealed. In other nations, (ex. Canada, Britain, Australia), the same policies prevailed and are in a state of ‘multicultural’ chaos, and Europe today is in a state of crisis with uncontrolled migration causing social collapse.
    Third, National Review ceased to be a serious magazine 40 years ago, when it was hijacked from Bill Buckley, who at least used to be fun. Maybe he just lost interest, or maybe he got worn down.

  6. Art says:

    It looks like immigrant Porta Ricans voting as a block in Florida (with malice for America) are going to swing the election to Clinton.

    How sad. The tribal divide and conquer Zionists win another four years.

    Ill-informed people have had their chain pulled and the ruling establishment stays in power.

  7. Jason Liu says:

    “I told you so!” does not solve problems.

    Barring a mass expulsion of minorities, the NR writer is correct in saying that the right needs more minority support. We can assume that all politics is identity politics, and that race is the primary driver behind political affiliation. However, consider the following:

    How is it that the left can openly advocate for non-white interests, and still have 30~40% white support?

    So why can’t the right advocate for white interests, and still have a large number of minority support? Even shaving 5~10% off blacks and Latinos would make the Democrats sweat.

    The Republican strategy fails because it tried to move beyond race. Few people are ever swayed by small government/low tax ideology. What’s needed is actually an undermining of the left’s racial narratives. The right should seek to:

    1. Use right wing minorities against left wing minorities/whites. This always causes anger on the left, and anger leads to irrationality and more importantly, negative perception by the public.

    2. Realign minority identities with the majority. This means imbuing outwardly assimilatable minorities with an aura of “Americaness”, so that they have the moral platform to punch down against leftist troublemakers. An example would be a white-looking Latino, or a nerdy middle-class Indian.

    3. Portray ideological leftism as a manifestation of whiteness. This is basically just highlighting the truth. Most left wing ideologues are based in and around academia, and almost all are white. Think pumpkin spice, veganism, problem glasses, “I-let-my-son-wear-a-dress!” — that kind of trash. Many minorities find that culture lame and distasteful.

    4. Appeal to maleness. This is the “young black male Republican” phenomenon. Most minorities are not at home with the white catlady culture that permeates urban (especially digital) culture. It is not uncommon to find a minority who is anti-racist, but also thinks feminism is retarded/goes too far. There is an appeal to male honor and pure meritocracy here that can be used to wedge the young male left, and peel off a few percentage points.

    And of course, the right needs to fight back against the increasingly wide and ridiculous definition of racism. Remember that most minorities are not college-style SJWs. Their perception of bigotry is simple and normative, and some degree of tribalism is understood (even if disliked). Meaning that if you need to explain in academic jargon why something is racist, chances are it doesn’t matter much to them.

  8. Since O’Sullivan still contributes to the magazine, now, as of this year, it’s a tad melodramatic when you carp on about him being “purged.” There are other people writing for it who second your position, e.g. Sowell and Heather Mac Donald who have not been ostracized, to say the least. The high-dudgeon grievance-nursing persecution complex gets old after a while.

    • Replies: @Greenstalk
  9. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    Some are planning for the extinction of White society:

    Barbara Lerner Spectre calls for destruction of Christian European ethnic societies

    BTW, how many Syrian, Libyan or Iraqi refugees has Israel taken in?

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    , @CanSpeccy
  10. Not much I can add to the James Kirkpatrick article, except to say that National Review seems intent on flaunting its cuckservative credentials. If Donald Trump loses, there will be a struggle for the soul of the GOP; I think it will result in a permanent schism within the party–Trump supporters will not docilely go back to supporting the Romneys and Ryans of the party.

    • Replies: @übertex
  11. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    They are steadfastly, consistently advancing their tribal agenda, in a fashion as naked as is the agenda’s targets love of their own submission; the interest of their tribe the only thing in their mind, its welfare the only end, to uproot their subjects a central aim.

    It will work; it will be met with gratitude. It is being met with gratitude. There is nothing Whites lust for like their disappearance.

    An ol’ time friend of mine had it only slightly wrong when she said Whites are the cancer of human history (it’s easy to make little mistakes: intense hatred disorders ideas). Whites are the cancer of Whites, and being their only cancer is the only endeavor they are still proud of it.

    Whites born in the USA and Europe who don’t love race-based subjection and find no fun in being slaves will be free to move to Japan, China, Russia, Korea… provided their IQ is high enough to make them useful to the community.

    • Replies: @artichoke
    , @another fred
  12. TheJester says:

    This article fits in nicely with iSteve’s article, “GOP’s 2012 Problem Was Not Enough White Votes.” The point is that the Coalition of the Fringes wins by voting strict identity politics and Whites do not. For example, there is precedence for 97% of Blacks to vote as a block. White candidates, on the other hand, are extremely lucky to garner 58% of the White vote.

    The Democrats have been able to gather an otherwise incompatible basket of ethnic and ideological groups glued together with a narrative of vitriolic hate for the White Male and his alleged crimes against humanity. All of the groups in the basket are entitled to government preferences for jobs, preferences for government contracts, handouts, welfare … and increasingly, newly created jobs as managers in the “Hate Industry” available only to people with politically correct views.

    The basket keeps getting bigger. Indeed, the “flight from White” is so charged and the pickings so easy that new racial identities are being defined as Non-White (i.e. MENA) based on ethnicity, religion, and/or culture in order to take part in the looting.

    As a sad statistic, the group enabling the Coalition of the Fringes to win elections is the inclusion of White Women in the coalition. It is their numbers that bring the Coalition over the top. Feminism in America road the draft of, first, the Anti-Slavery movement and, then, the Civil Rights Movement. Unsurprisingly, their movement is also driven by a vitriolic hate for the White Man (fathers, husbands, brothers, uncles, nephews) and his civilization. However, although voting for their own destruction, I don’t see White feminists readily giving up their place in the Coalition. It pays too well.

    As a White Male, I have been face-to-face with the impact of affirmative action in education, the military, corporations, and even my family my entire working life. Examples:

    (1) My daughter-in-law has garnered a $500,000/year income from being female, Hispanic, and running a small business. She brings no market value to her lot in life except being female, Hispanic, running a small business, and her willingness to shamelessly cash in on the opportunities.

    (2) The corporation I currently work for has been feminized. Women “own” the HR and training divisions, putting them in an excellent position to enforce racial, ethnic, and gender quotas and policies. As company policy, women with children can come and go as they please with managers charged to sort out the problems. They call it the “Life Balance” career track … with no impact on salaries or promotions. No males need apply.

    The point is that few White women would be willing give up these economic benefits and advantages regardless of their long-term impact on their culture and way of life. The only solution is to figure out a way to politically “kill” affirmative action and its thinly-veiled reparations and return to a society based on equality under the law.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
    , @CanSpeccy
  13. Rehmat says:

    I love these White racist conmen. They hate to admit that the West refused to accept White immigration from South Africa, Rhodesia, and other colonies in the past. They also hate to acknowledge that the great majority of the 60 million refugees, mostly Muslims, were created by the US, EU and Israeli wars in the Middle East, and Africa.

    Last year, Russian president Vladimir Putin blamed the ‘self-centered’ Western policies in the Middle East and Africa for Europe’s current refugee crisis. Putin also said that Syrians are not running away from Bashar al-Assad regime but ISIS, the terrorist militia created by the US for Israel….

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/09/07/putin-refugee-crisis-created-by-the-us-eu/

  14. It should be obvious to anyone with a brain that the primary interest of a typical politician is power and the prestige that follows with it. Principles are means to that power, not a reason for seeking it. That this is the type of person drawn to a powerful government (as opposed to a limited government) is as natural as vultures being drawn to a dead corpse.

    When “we” gave the government this kind of power we created this situation.

    If you don’t know this, you really don’t know much about the world, human beings, or politics.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  15. biz says:
    @TJM

    The American Jews who support more immigration and the Jews in Israel who don’t are different people. I know that is hard to grasp, but just try.

    Furthermore, Jews, Zionist or not, are most definitely not a large influence on European politics, due to small numbers.

  16. nsa says:

    This is exactly the way empires die….rotting from within. There is NO remedy. The Hate-On-Whitey 40% VisMin population along with their vile jooie masters might be manageable politically, but not if you add in the race traitors……white single females and white sexual deviants. This coalition is as unstoppable as the tides or sunspots. These facts are obvious to everyone except the deluded cucks over at TAC who are laughably still touting a return to traditional religion and values….

  17. MMM says:
    @TJM

    Well said, and true. And incredible that we didn’t pay enough attention, in time, regardless that those Jews were/are merchants of chaos and past masters of deception. They always have been parasites, predators and supremicists as well. Why didn’t we look and see?

  18. Rehmat says:
    @biz

    No wonder, Rabbi Davod Weiss had called ‘self-denial’ a great virtue of a Zionist Jew.

    I guess Israel Lobby doesn’t exist in the US, UK, France, Australia or Germany. If so, Jews being in minority still control governments, press and financial institution in those countries.

    In Britain, even a priest is forced to abandon his parish for criticizing the Zionist regime or saying that Israel committed 9/11.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/11/04/uks-stephen-sizer-to-leave-priesthood-over-jewish-bullying/

  19. Wally says:
    @biz

    Good try, but no cigar. There is no distinction.

    Jews in US admit “Israel First”

    http://mondoweiss.net/2016/07/bluntly-firsters-politics/

    and:
    The commander behind the pro-Israel student troops on U.S. college campuses

    http://www.haaretz.com/misc/article-print-page//.premium-1.709014

    Who demands mass immigration into white gentile countries, but stops non-Jew immigration into “that shitty little country”?
    Who runs the Federal Reserve?
    Who runs Wall Street?
    Who owns the US Congress?
    Who owns the White House?
    Who dominates the US Supreme Court?
    Who forces acceptance of the fictitious & impossible ’6M & gas chambers’?
    Who runs the media / entertainment?
    Who runs the music business?
    Who dominates ‘academia’?
    Why is AIPAC the most powerful, dominant lobby, which regularly writes the text of Congressional bills and resolutions?
    Who is it that wants to censor free speech via the “hate speech” canard?
    Who is it that demands we shed the blood of US troops for their interests?
    Who are the real & biggest racists on the planet?

  20. geokat62 says:
    @biz

    Furthermore, Jews, Zionist or not, are most definitely not a large influence on European politics, due to small numbers.

    … most definitely?

    BICOM – United Kingdom

    Former Labour Member of Parliament (MP) Tam Dalyellwho in 2003 stated that former prime minister and party leader Tony Blair was unduly influenced by a “cabal of Jewish advisers” in forming his Middle East policy towards Iraq, Syria and Iran. Dalyell initially named several influential British advisors of Jewish heritage, but later focused on Middle East envoy, Lord Levy…

    A little background on his lordship:

    One of Blair’s early supporters was Michael Levy, a staunch supporter of Israel’s policies against Palestinians, a former board member of the Jewish Agency and active in various Jewish charities in Britain. Levy began to support Blair’s private office from his own pocket. He has since raised millions of pounds for the Labour Party. Levy’s fundraising efforts for Blair eventually paid off when Blair became Prime Minister. First appointed an envoy by Tony Blair after the 1997 election, Levy — later nicknamed “Lord Cashpoint” — has helped to develop a strongly pro-Israel line from Blair’s office. Three years later, Levy was appointed Tony Blair’s personal envoy to the Middle East. In July 2006 and again in January of this year, Levy was arrested in connection with allegations that Labour Party supporters were offered honors in return for loans and donations. With the resignation of Tony Blair today, Levy also steps down. Commenting on Levy’s resignation, Richard Spring, a Conservative spokesman on foreign affairs, told The Independent: “I welcome his departure. We have some of the most skilled and distinguished diplomats in the world and they have been humiliated and sidelined by Lord Levy’s antics in the Middle East. He has caused great embarrassment for this country.”

    https://electronicintifada.net/content/tony-blair-true-friend-israel/7038

    CRIF – France

    French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy said Sunday that “it is as a Jew“ that he “participated in the political adventure in Libya,” in the first National Convention organized by the Representative Council of Jewish Organizations of France (CRIF).

    “I would not have done if I had not been Jewish,” said the philosopher, before an audience of nearly 900 people, meeting in Paris, adding: “I wore my flag in fidelity to my name and my loyalty to Zionism and Israel. “

    https://extremeprejudiceusa.wordpress.com/2011/11/24/bernard-henri-levy-would-not-have-gone-to-libya-he-he-not-been-jewish/

    A little background on BHL:

    But you can’t just support an uprising. You need somebody to call, and as the revolt grew, Sarkozy had no idea who could speak for the new Libya. At just that moment, BHL, the philosopher, rang the Élysée Palace switchboard to tell the president he’d decided to go to the rebel capital of Benghazi. Sarkozy told BHL to let him know if he found any leaders among the fighters, and the self-styled intellectual swashbuckler needed no further encouragement. From Bosnia to Afghanistan, Iraq to Pakistan, BHL has always taken the side of those he saw as oppressed—and never failed to promote himself in the process. “BHL did the usual,” says a close friend of Sarkozy. “You know, ‘Save this! Save that!’ But he did manage to push the system to do something that cannot now be undone.”

    Sarkozy and BHL have known each other since 1983, and they used to be good friends. They went skiing together in Alpe d’Huez and vacationed on the Riviera at Beaulieu and Antibes. When BHL was pushing for intervention in Bosnia in the early 1990s, Sarkozy (back then only a relatively junior minister in the cabinet of then–prime minister Édouard Balladur) took BHL’s side against formidable opponents like Alain Juppé, who was (and is again) France’s minister of foreign affairs.

    http://www.newsweek.com/why-sarkozy-went-war-66463

  21. @Carlton Meyer

    (Trump) is also reluctant to challenge the legal immigration rackets like H-1Bs, so called “skilled” workers.

    What the hell? Trump is the only person running for President to ever attack the H1-b racket.

  22. @Jason Liu

    Barring a mass expulsion of minorities, the NR writer is correct in saying that the right needs more minority support.

    And we’re correct in pointing out that NR and the GOP have worked hard to create a more left wing and more non-white America. Why should we take advice from the very same people who have a track record of creating the very problems they now claim to know how to solve?

  23. Svigor says:

    The American Jews who support more immigration and the Jews in Israel who don’t are different people. I know that is hard to grasp, but just try.

    Nah. One big Jewry. Bosom buddies. What closer friend does Israeli Jewry have than American Jewry? Who does American Jewry pull for, more than they pull for Israeli Jewry? BFFs. Israeli Jews come here, and they “become” like “liberal” American Jews. American Jews go there, and they “become” like “conservative” Israeli Jews. Both “ideologies” are poses, and there is in truth only one ideology, “Jewish Supremacy,” AKA “is it good for the Jews?” Jews don’t actually change their stripes when they cross the Atlantic – just their tactics.

    I know this is hard to grasp, but try anyway.

    Furthermore, Jews, Zionist or not, are most definitely not a large influence on European politics, due to small numbers.

    True. Things aren’t nearly as bad in Europe, either.

  24. @violin tuner

    O’Sullivan used to be the magazines head honcho during it’s most conservative period. He was forced out as part of the purge of the immigration restrictionists in the late 1990′s which also claimed Peter Brimelow and Steve Sailer, among several others.

    They still allow him to write articles, which, pending Lowery’s approval, they may or may not publish.

    • Replies: @Art
  25. Clyde says:
    @biz

    What you see here is typical at Unz. A very good article is posted then the same dimbulb jew_haters_with_no_freakin’_lives pour in and post the same crappy comments they have posted a hundred times before.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  26. Art says:
    @biz

    The American Jews who support more immigration and the Jews in Israel who don’t are different people. I know that is hard to grasp, but just try.

    That is a total lie – straight from Hasbara Central.

    Both sets of Jews want only Jew immigration into Israel and non-white immigration into America.

    p.s. Little Jews always mindlessly follow what the Big Jews want. They are traumatized and terrorized at the age of 10 into subservience to the tribe. At the drop of a Big Jew hat, the Little Jew brainstem overtakes their thinking brain – how sad.

  27. Art says:
    @Greenstalk

    They still allow him to write articles, which, pending Lowery’s approval, they may or may not publish.

    Lowery handed over the election to the 1% establishment and the Clintons. He is another Gentile face working the Jew’s agenda.

    Some conservative, clearly Lowery wants to hand over the supreme court to the Jews.

  28. @Jason Liu

    How is it that the left can openly advocate for non-white interests, and still have 30~40% white support?

    So why can’t the right advocate for white interests, and still have a large number of minority support?

    Because there’s no Facebook likes for virtue signaling amongst minorities, and unlike that large group of SWPLs, at least those minorities live in the real world and understand how it gets made. They suffer from no pathological altruism.

    The brilliant “strategy” laid out in your list is hilariously off the mark. “Use right wing minorities against left wing minorities/whites”? “Realign minority identities with the majority”? What do these words even mean in practical terms? It’s ivory tower piffle one would expect from the National Review.

    Minorities don’t give two shits about “ideological leftism”. They’re just backing the side that tells them and gives them what they want.

    “young black male Republican” ? Even assuming this is not a sociopolitical unicorn, how is wooing what could only be a tiny sliver of a small minority population going to build the future of the GOP?

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  29. joe webb says:

    a SLOGAN SHOULD BE PRODUCED AFTER THE ELECTION SHOWING THE WHTIE VOTE, COMPARED TO THE COLORED VOTE.

    ETC…IF THIS DOES NOT WORK, IT IS CLOSE TO HOPELESS.

    JOE WEBB

  30. anon • Disclaimer says:

    The Democratic Party needs Republicans. Because Hispanics hate Blacks. And urban gays can’t avoid black crime.

    In Chicago, poor blacks are in decline. Replaced by Hispanics. The epic battle to eliminate Cabrini Green was a huge victory. The rest of the projects are either gone, transformed into senior citizen housing, or occupy neighborhoods that no one wants.

    Blacks have gone from Electing Harold Washington in the 80′s to hanging on to their shrinking, declining neighborhoods. While their hegemony has been constantly eroded. Hispanics occupy strategic ground. Clinton welfare reform has made life less comfortable. And gentrification is unstoppable.

    All that’s left are the killing grounds like Austin and Englewood, which between them have 1/4 of the city’s homicides. Plus a half dozen like them but smaller.

    You gotta remember, no foreign minorities give a shit about slavery and micro aggressions. They just follow their own interests and believe their lying eyes.

    I am convinced that there was a vast conspiracy to keep Trump from totally collapsing. He is literally the worst candidate imaginable. He managed to tap into a bona fide populist sentiment, but was unable to focus on anything beyond the next five minutes. His failure to prepare for the debates was inexcusable.

    Its true enough that it was rigged and there is no way that they would let an outsider like Trump win. But every time it looked like Trump would collapse into McGovern territory, the media would back off an inch and then publish some anti Hillary material.

    Blacks are 12% of the population. Hispanics are 17% and growing. The only way to keep those two groups on the same team is to have an ‘other’ … the demon white racists.

  31. Mr. Anon says:
    @Clyde

    What about the knee-jerk commenters who refuse to even consider the importance or prevalence of jewish influence and power. Those like you, I mean?

    • Replies: @Clyde
  32. Mr. Anon says:

    The National Review: Bent over and getting savagely ass-raped by history while yelling “Don’t Stop!”.

    Perhaps even the perjorative term “Cuckservatives” isn’t good enough for them anymore. A new term is needed. “Punkservatives”?

  33. dfordoom says: • Website
    @TheJester

    As a sad statistic, the group enabling the Coalition of the Fringes to win elections is the inclusion of White Women in the coalition.

    Even more sad is the fact that they’re willing to remain in a coalition in which they’re at the bottom of the totem pole, and despised and resented by all the other members of that coalition.

    The Coalition of the Fringes has benefited a very tiny minority of women. Most women are worse off than they were half a century ago. White women go on supporting the coalition because they’ve been taught to blame men for their problems instead of accepting responsibility for their own poor choices.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    , @ogunsiron
  34. dfordoom says: • Website
    @another fred

    That this is the type of person drawn to a powerful government (as opposed to a limited government) is as natural as vultures being drawn to a dead corpse.

    That’s true, but it’s also true that in a democracy limited government tends to become powerful government. It’s a basic flaw in representative democracy.

    The only real way to prevent this is to have a strong monarchy. I mean a real monarchy, not a wishy-washy constitutional monarchy. Any significant increase in the power of politicians or bureaucrats will be opposed vigorously by the king since it would be a threat to the royal power.

    More direct democracy (referendums) would be a help but it would first be necessary to break the power of the judiciary. This is another advantage of monarchy since a king would also act to prevent the judiciary from setting itself up as an alternative government.

  35. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Greg Bacon

    Furthermore, Jews, Zionist or not, are most definitely not a large influence on European politics, due to small numbers.

    Well at least the BBC seems to be firmly under Jewish control.

  36. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Oleaginous Outrager

    The brilliant “strategy” laid out in your list is hilariously off the mark. “Use right wing minorities against left wing minorities/whites”? “Realign minority identities with the majority”? What do these words even mean in practical terms? It’s ivory tower piffle one would expect from the National Review.

    At least Jason Liu is suggesting a strategy. What’s your suggestion?

    Jason Liu is not suggesting the NR/cuckservative strategy of desperately trying to pander to every minority. He’s suggesting an attempt to split the Coalition of the Fringes by targeting specific minority groups that could be persuaded that it would be in their own self-interest to switch their allegiance.

    And the only chance of success is to split the Coalition of the Fringes because at the moment they have the numbers. Peel off a few percentage points here and there and the balance could shift just enough.

    • Replies: @Alec Leamas
  37. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Greg Bacon

    Some are planning for the extinction of White society

    White genocide is now a universal policy. The process depends on:

    (1) a toxic culture imposed top down by NPR, BBC, the NY Times, Hollywood, and most importantly, the school system that provides brainwashing in the name of education, the combined effects of which is to undermine the fertility of the native population. Women are taught that taking a man’s job is what every woman should aspire to do, whereas staying home and raising a family is for losers. Meantime, homosexual marriage, mass slaughter of the unborn, no-fault divorce, transgenderism and anything else that militates against reproduction is promoted.

    (2) Mass replacement immigration is then deemed a necessity.

    Thus the European nations are being destroyed.

    Anyone who points this out is branded a racist by the advocates of genocide such as Barbara Lerner, and the media, and the PC-ruled universities. Many of the brainwashed mass, particularly the young and the ignorant, agree. they have been well taught and now hate their own kind.

    As for the conservatives, their principles amount to nothing but serving the Money Power, and the money power, intent on creating a global system governance, intends the destruction of the nation state, beginning with the most powerful states, namely the European nations and the Anglo colonies.

    Oddly, Jews in America and Euurope too(?) are dying out faster than anyone else. So why people like Barabara Lerner are so enthusiastic about mass replacement immigration to the European nations is not easy to understand.

  38. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @TheJester

    The point is that the Coalition of the Fringes wins by voting strict identity politics and Whites do not.

    Whites do vote according to identity. The problem is that white women in large numbers vote as women, i.e., feminists. They are anti-nationalists because they are anti-natalists. They want a career, not babies, so screw the race if babies are necessary to the continuation of the race. Hence most of Hillary’s support.

  39. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @dfordoom

    Even more sad is the fact that they’re willing to remain in a coalition in which they’re at the bottom of the totem pole

    But they benefit from quotas for female hiring, and the destruction of the social structures that kept women in their place, i.e., at home raising children. Now, as women hold almost half the jobs, and a majority in the professions, men are still not having babies.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  40. Clyde says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Jews are a small part of the immigration-invasion game. Non-Jews have agency in America, Europe and everywhere. The North Eastern WASP elites that governed America caved in on immigration and Johnson’s Great Society programs. They did the same in Australia (very few Jews in Oz back then) when they eliminated the “White Australia” immigration policy. Same was going on in Europe where Turks and other Muslim guest workers were allowed in and never forced to leave. Though the ones in Switzerland were.

    • Replies: @Amasius
  41. National Review exists to promote the political views of the US Chamber of Commerce, and for no other reason. A less conservative magazine is hard to even imagine.

  42. dfordoom says: • Website
    @CanSpeccy

    But they benefit from quotas for female hiring and the destruction of the social structures that kept women in their place, i.e., at home raising children.

    That doesn’t actually benefit women. Apart from privileged middle-class women with cushy jobs in academia or the bureaucracy. It doesn’t benefit the majority of women who are now more unhappy, more angry, more embittered, more stressed and more lonely and alienated than ever before.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  43. If you look at the racial breakdown of data complied by Steve Sailer in the aftermath of the 2012 election, it’s unmistakably clear that (1) whites are not even a little racist and (2) that non-whites are quite racist.

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/gops-2012-problem-was-not-enough-white-votes/

    So the NR “solution” of wagging a disapproving finger at whites for their imaginary racism and throwing open the borders to still more (racist) Hispanic immigrants looks like trying to put out a fire by spaying gasoline on it.

  44. Amasius says:
    @Clyde

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/08/the-war-on-white-australia-a-case-study-in-the-culture-of-critique-part-1-of-5/

    ‘The national editor of the Australian Jewish News, Dan Goldberg proudly acknowledges this, noting that: “In addition to their activism on Aboriginal issues, Jews were instrumental in leading the crusade against the White Australia policy, a series of laws from 1901 to 1973 that restricted non-White immigration to Australia.”’

    http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/CofCchap7.pdf

    • Replies: @Clyde
    , @Stan
  45. Clyde says:
    @Amasius

    Its bllshit and like I said…non-Jews are not mind numbed robots. They have agency. They controlled/control Australia. Not enough Jews there to change Australia’s white immigration policies. Do you have any numbers for Jews in Australia at that time?

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  46. Stan says:
    @Amasius

    Some people do not want to be confused with the facts.

    • Agree: Amasius
  47. @dfordoom

    It’s a wishlist, not a plan.

    The first rule of holes – which seems to me to be analogous to the first rule of demographics – is to stop digging. Since a GOP-sanctioned amnesty would not increase the share of the GOP’s vote from minorities, block it at every turn. Never allow an amnesty regardless of the political taunts from Democrats. In the event Trump wins, work with him to propose a suite of immigration enforcement policies and use attrition to force those here illegally back to their nations of origin. Weather the storm of tear-jerking media about “families split up” by “artificial borders.” Build a wall – at the very least it is a clear declaration of our intent to enforce our border and immigration laws. If and when you accomplish these feats, make the argument that the resultant rising wages are a consequence of limiting immigration and pivot to limiting legal immigration. Speak then of a policy of “Americanization” and “integration” referring to prior immigration pauses which resulted in a more unified nation and broader economic prosperity.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  48. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @dfordoom

    It doesn’t benefit the majority of women who are now more unhappy, more angry, more embittered, more stressed and more lonely and alienated than ever before.

    Yes, and there’s no way back.

    By competing with their husbands for work, women have driven down wages so now most married couples needs two jobs to maintain a 1960′s lifestyle. A bipartisan open-border policy further depresses wages and makes it vital for most families to have two incomes.

    What’s more, many women’s husbands are working alongside other men’s wives, many of the latter dolled up and interested in alternative opportunities. So, in an age of no-fault divorce, women need to stay in the workforce to maintain their employability as a form of economic insurance.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  49. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Clyde

    Its bllshit and like I said…non-Jews are not mind numbed robots. They have agency. They controlled/control Australia.

    So a Jew can boast that

    Jews were instrumental in leading the crusade against the White Australia policy

    , but anyone else saying the same thing is an anti-Semite. Do I have that right?

    • Replies: @Clyde
  50. Miro23 says:

    The US really needs two walls, one with Mexico and another between Business and the State.

    The Business/State one will have a:

    Business Side: International corporations, banks, financiers, Wall St and the FED.

    State Side: Well paid, skilled and high status administrators representing the public in the various offices of state, such as the Treasury, Education, Trade, Defense etc.

    The Nº1 rule (enforced) is that the two sides lead separate lives, do not socialize and never work in each other’s sectors at any point in their lives. Also their communication is entirely in the public record.

  51. Marc B. says:

    This article leads to the question of whether the United States is destined to die from its own ‘internal contradictions’. The old Hegelian or Marxist applications of historical, conceptual, dialectical analysis seem pertinent here, at least. As demonstrated by Kirkpatrick, the intellectual behavior of Conservatism, Inc. shows a stubborn resilience in certain abstract, American ‘propositions’, principles, and beliefs, despite the failure of these abstractions in the face of a new reality that is contradicting them. It’s change or die time. The mother of all tenuous, shaky modern beliefs is the Enlightenment-era humanist notion of universal equality, inscribed into the U.S. Constitution and founding documents. As a matter of historical fact, the Founders did not believe that ‘all humans are created equal’; their intention was simply to ensure the extension of the franchise to men, of mostly European origins, who were not born of privilege. However, the extreme generality and abstractness of the wording in the founding documents left them open to apparently infinite extension and interpretation, of which modern, multi-cult Leftists have taken full advantage. The question is whether a new Right can emerge in America, either from the soil of the Republican Party or from an awakening of the white working-class, in time. Like the intellectual European New Right, future American conservatives must actually embrace, understand, and use those Leftist intellectual criticisms which aimed to expose the concealed, ethnocentric assumptions and character of the apparently ‘universal’ humanist claims found in Enlightenment-era documents. Whereas the Left undertook this critique in order to undermine European traditions and pretensions to universality, the New Right must accept this critique in positive terms, admitting, recognizing, and embracing explicitly that philosophical and political movements, behaviors, and beliefs arise from the particular, not universal, character of peoples.

    • Agree: ogunsiron
    • Replies: @Diversity Heretic
  52. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Alec Leamas

    Never allow an amnesty regardless of the political taunts from Democrats. In the event Trump wins, work with him to propose a suite of immigration enforcement policies and use attrition to force those here illegally back to their nations of origin.

    Obviously blocking amnesty and restricting immigration are very very good ideas and pretty much essential.

    But even if that could be achieved there’s still the problem that immigrants already in the country (legal immigrants) will keep outbreeding whites. And deporting more than a handful of illegals is just not politically possible. Not with the entire media against you. It’s a fantasy.

    The fact is that the GOP has already pretty much lost the demographic war. It has no future at all unless the Coalition of the Fringes can be significantly weakened or split.

    There’s yet another problem, and it’s an even bigger one. The crushing victory of the SJWs in the culture wars means that the GOP’s share of the white vote will steadily decline – Millennials are overwhelmingly liberal. I know Not All Millennials Are Like That, but most are. In the next two election cycles there’s going to be a massive surge of white Millennial Democrat voters. No immigration restriction policy is going to change that.

    • Replies: @Greenstalk
  53. dfordoom says: • Website
    @CanSpeccy

    By competing with their husbands for work, women have driven down wages so now most married couples needs two jobs to maintain a 1960′s lifestyle

    Exactly. For ordinary women who don’t have cushy jobs in academia it’s not so much a matter of wanting to work – they’re forced to work whether they want to or not. Apart from all its other evils feminism has reduced the choices available to the average woman.

  54. The Republicans are not called the stupid party for nothing.

  55. Clyde says:
    @CanSpeccy

    No, just wrong in the percentage of blame assigned to Australian Jews over the ending of the White Australia immigration policy. BTW under this policy Sephardic-Mizrahi Jews not allowed in.
    History of the Jews in Australia – Wikipedia

  56. KenH says:

    Republicans, cuckservative or other, are totally clueless and think they can keep refining their sales pitch to non-whites and one day soon they’ll hit pay dirt. Those “timeless principles” of conservatism, inc., seem to change with the political winds given the number of issues they’ve totally surrendered and caved on since 1965. This NR article and the defeatist, submit to the radical left tone of many others is evidence of that.

    Non-whites want to be ruled by their own respective tribes, not by supplicating white cucks who adhere to a platform of racial equality, low taxes and endless war for Israel. They may be tolerated as useful idiots for now, but once non-whites reach critical mass they’ll be rudely cast aside in favor people who look and think like they do.

    • Agree: artichoke
    • Replies: @dfordoom
  57. @Marc B.

    Very good comment–you’ve been paying attention! Adherence to principles rather than people has been a major source of the decline of the West in general and of whites in the U.S. in particular. I think that it is too late to save the U.S. as it now exists, but possibly some geographic portion of it (no I don’t know which) may be salvageable.

  58. artichoke says:
    @Anonymous

    It’ll be funny if that sort of brain drain FROM the USA ramps up. The SJW agenda relies on a steady workhorse white male to fund the goodies, taken in the name of “injustice”. If that white male leaves so the place can be truly just (nothing but incompetents left) then the SJW drowns in his own shit.

    It will be beautiful to behold, and real estate will eventually be cheap to buy back in and fix the place back up, but that’s probably beyond my time here to observe.

    Or Trump can win and it will be better for everyone including the SJW’s.

  59. @dfordoom

    The crushing victory of the SJWs in the culture wars means that the GOP’s share of the white vote will steadily decline – Millennials are overwhelmingly liberal.

    Can you call it a culture war if only one side is fighting it? The Official Conservative Movement has displayed a marked terror of getting involved in any culture war. Their stock response to the latest racist outrage perpetrated by the left is to drop to their knees and grovelling plead their own innocence of any BadThought.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  60. ogunsiron says:
    @dfordoom

    I think white women, especially those who echo, are at this moment, still doing pretty well in SJW land. The POC pets are getting restless but the SJW white/jewish women still own that piece of the socio-culture.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  61. @Anonymous

    Whites born in the USA and Europe who don’t love race-based subjection and find no fun in being slaves will be free to move to Japan, China, Russia, Korea… provided their IQ is high enough to make them useful to the community.

    Your scenario assumes that we will have some kind of majority rule.

    IMO, what the balkanization of the US assures is that it will be ruled by fiat of some central authority, an oligarchy or dictatorship, even if not named that. Looking at the history of such nations, I do not see support for an assumption that the central authority will be controlled by members of a majority of the population.

    We should be careful what we wish for.

  62. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Greenstalk

    Can you call it a culture war if only one side is fighting it? The Official Conservative Movement has displayed a marked terror of getting involved in any culture war.

    Good point. It was more like a culture massacre. The Official Conservative Movement obviously felt it was better to concentrate their efforts on the things that really matter. More tax cuts for the rich!

  63. dfordoom says: • Website
    @ogunsiron

    I think white women, especially those who echo, are at this moment, still doing pretty well in SJW land.

    Yeah, feminism and the SJW agenda have been pretty good for maybe a quarter of the female population. And as long as they’re doing well they don’t care that the other three-quarters of women are doing much much worse.

    Of course even for the quarter that are doing well things might not be so great when they reach their forties and realise they’re going to be lonely and bitter for the rest of their lives, and that even their cats don’t like them very much.

    • Replies: @ogunsiron
  64. dfordoom says: • Website
    @KenH

    Republicans, cuckservative or other, are totally clueless and think they can keep refining their sales pitch to non-whites and one day soon they’ll hit pay dirt.

    That might be true but the problem is that remaking the party as the party of whites won’t work. The Coalition of the Fringes includes liberal urban goodwhites and those liberal urban goodwhites will never ever abandon their liberal SJW feelgood religion. A party of whites would actually be based on maybe half the white population. And half the white population is going to add up to a permanent minority of the total electorate.

  65. @biz

    The American Jews who support more immigration and the Jews in Israel who don’t are different people. I know that is hard to grasp, but just try.

    Israel’s open borders (Law of Return) for Jewish protected class people is extremely similar to the US’s open borders (Amnesty Reform) for American protected class people.

    America’s protected class people:

    African American, Alternate Lifestyle, Asian, Disabled, Hispanic & Latino, Jewish, Native American, Women

    http://www.mindexchange.com/diversity.htm

  66. ogunsiron says:
    @dfordoom

    PS : A few rough days ahead for white women, as they’re the scapegoat du jour for the Trumpening.

  67. Boris N says:

    A very ridiculously interesting article is cited:

    The state became majority-minority in 2001; whites are now 39 percent of its population and dwindling.

    Probably, American racial thought will always frustrate me. Why does the author speak about Hispanics as non-white? Hispanics must be white. The only difference between them and others whites that the former speak Spanish (an Indo-European language, which is very close to English, by the way) and they are Catholics, that is pious Christians as Good Ol’ America is supposed to be. Hispanics in the USA are no less white than Spaniards, Portuguese or Italians. Are those South European people also “not enough white”? Even the US census confirm their whiteness. 53% of US Hispanics are white and some 36% are “others”, but they easily can be considered white (at least they are neither black nor Asian). So what is the problem then? It seems the “problem” is that California (and the southern USA, in general) is becoming Spanish-speaking and not that it’s becoming non-white. Even if it’s a problem that’s for those Americans who have got accustomed to their privileged position being a speaker of the world’s dominating language. But why not to stop being language chauvinists and finally learn that beautiful language called Español. There are many multilingual countries in the world and sure English-speaking Americans can handle to learn another language.

    Yes, I know some say that all those Hispanics are mestizos, hence non-white and alien elements for America, but why being Christian and speaking a closely related language is not enough to be qualified as a friendly nation? I wonder how one is going to measure the level of whiteness and racial mixing in Hispanics.

    And this is really brilliant:

    They can have their culture at home. In public, you’re an American. They’re celebrating their own holidays instead of ours.

    What does that old American lady mean? Do Hispanics celebrate Eid or Purim? What is her business after all what other people celebrate?

    • Replies: @Alden
  68. Alden says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    Whites should be the biggest advocates of low cost (free for welfare slugs) legal abortion.
    Whites have the lowest rates of abortion. Blacks and Hispanics have the highest rates of abortion.

    We’re it not for abortion, blacks would be around 35 percent of the population, not 12.5. Which would you rather have?

    White nationalists have tried to ally themselves with conservatives such as anti abortion crusaders, pro capitalist economics, fundamentalist bible thumpers and even asinine patriotism.

    It’s totally futile. The anti abortionists are Catholics and fundamentalist bible thumpers who make tens of millions a year running their refugee settlement rackets and adopting Haitian babies.

    The capitalist want to replace all White Anerican workers with non Whited from Drs and engineers to dishwashers.

    Idiot patriots love the country that wants to get rid of Whites as soon as possible without having to deal with extermination centers and the disposable of 200 million bodies.

    Conservativism is as much an enemy of Whites as liberalism is.

  69. Alden says:
    @Boris N

    Boris, you don’t live in the USA do you? You have never been to California have you? The Hispanics invading America are almost all very primitive Mexican and Central American Indians

    They look nothing like Spainiards Most don’t speak more than about 50 words of Spainish let alone English.

    The Hispanic, not the Spainish race was created by the executive order of President Nixon in 1970 just in time for the census.
    At the same time a Ford foundation lawsuit with a Hispanic organization calling itself LA RAZA arrived at the supreme governing body of the United States, the Supreme Court.

    The court ruled that

    1. Hispanics are a separate race, not an ethnic group.
    2. Hispanics are entitled by law to affirmative action racial preference in everything from government benefits to college admissions to any and all jobs.

    The official government definition of Hispanic is: Any person who was born in or whose ancestors lived in any Spainish speaking country regardless of race.

    Portugual and Its former colonies are not counted as Hispanic by American law.

    Therefore, Arabs from former Spainish Morocco are Hispanics Blacks from Any Latin American country except Brazil are Hispanic Blonde and red headed Spainiards are Hispanic

    But most Hispanics in the United States are American Indians from the primitive jungles and villages of Mexico and Cebtral America.

    Visually, they are very distinctive. The women are 5ft or less. The men range from 5ft to 5ft5. Their faces are distinctive. They are overweight with enormous protruding bellies.

    Their religion is either Catholic or fundamentalist Protestant but they ignore the rules of those religions. They have the highest rate of abortion the highest rate of teen pregnancy and a very high rate of molestation of under age girls.

    Many are not Christians at all. A major religion is Santa Muerte or Saint death. They have stores all over California selling Santa Muerte witch doctor apparatus. Santa Muerte practices animal sacrifice. There is also a pagan Hispanic religion
    Santeria similar to voodoo. Santeria also practices animal sacrifice

    They have a far, far higher crime rate that the Spainish Europeans do.

    Come to S California and see Hispanics. Both by President Nixon’s executive order and race, they are not White.

    • Replies: @Boris N
    , @anon
    , @Art Deco
  70. Boris N says:
    @Alden

    No, never been. But it is not my disadvantage, but rather my advantage. I can see things as a total stranger without prejudices and indoctrination. I agree I may not understand many things. I may even be totally wrong. But. For me you seem just demonize the people.

    They look nothing like Spainiards

    For me, a North European living among North Europeans, all those southern people looks the same. Spaniards, Italians, Arabs, Armenians, Georgians, Mexicans, whatever. Swarthy southern people. Yes, I know they are somewhat different. I believe I can discriminate between Italians and Arabs or Spaniard and Mexicans, but often it is difficult for me. So culture for me is more important. Arabs and Italians may look similar, but I sympathize Italians. The same way I sympathize Latin Americans. Not that I prefer Latin America over Anglo America (I do not speak Spanish and I doubt I will), but it is what it is.

    Most don’t speak more than about 50 words of Spainish let alone English.

    What you are saying is stupid. They perfectly know well their native language, as any human beings do. They are not inarticulate monkeys.

    1. Hispanics are a separate race, not an ethnic group.

    The official government definition of Hispanic is: Any person who was born in or whose ancestors lived in any Spainish speaking country regardless of race.

    You contradict yourself. Yes, Hispanics officially are not a race, it’s just they speak Spanish and it is the only important ethnic marker that really matters. But people, including you, try to say the opposite. That is why I’m surprised. And after all, I’ve clearly stated that the racial categories in America are totally artificial and do nothing good. It is divide and rule.

    But most Hispanics in the United States are American Indians from the primitive jungles and villages of Mexico and Cebtral America.

    As the ancestors of most White Americans who were mostly primitive village dwellers back in Europe (though there are no jungles there). It is all about class, not race.

    Visually, they are very distinctive. The women are 5ft or less. The men range from 5ft to 5ft5. Their faces are distinctive. They are overweight with enormous protruding bellies.

    OK, some or many Hispanics are distinctive from White Americans (I’m not sure about that “overweight with enormous protruding bellies” part). Some are not (especially about the bellies). How does it matter? Would you prefer less distinctive Arabs? The appearance may be deceptive.

    Their religion is either Catholic or fundamentalist Protestant but they ignore the rules of those religions.
    Many are not Christians at all.

    Whatever. What you describe sounds nothing terrible to me. But again it is not about the race, but the culture. Or do you believe culture is bound to outer physiology? And many if not most White Americans are not pious Christians as well. But at least Hispanics are not Muslims or Hindu.

    They have a far, far higher crime rate that the Spainish Europeans do.

    It is not true. Read the article by Ron Unz on this very site.

    http://www.unz.com/article/the-myth-of-hispanic-crime/

    (You seem having commented there, but didn’t you read the article?)

  71. Art Deco says:
    @Alden

    But most Hispanics in the United States are American Indians from the primitive jungles and villages of Mexico and Cebtral America.

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929714004765

    This study assessed the ancestry of its U.S. Latino sample as 65% caucasian.

    About 15% of Mexico’s population works in the agricultural sector and only about 2% speak Indian dialects at home. Tropical rainforest tends to be very sparsely populated. If people are living there, they’ve cleared the land.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.