The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 James Kirkpatrick Archive
Narrative Collapse: Is Charlottesville’s James Alex Fields the Next George Zimmerman?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
ReginaldDennyAntifa
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

President Donald Trump finally did what no-one in the Conservative Establishment would: calling out the Antifa (the “Alt Left” in his words) for sparking violence at the legally-sanctioned demonstration in Charlottesville: “You had a group on the other side that came charging in without permit,” the President said. “They were very violent” [Trump Says ‘Both Sides’ to Blame in Charlottesville Violence, Reversing Monday’s Stance, by Peter Nicholas, Wall Street Journal, August 15, 2017].

This is objectively a true statement. And it has sparked nothing short of shrieking hysteria from the Opposition Party, the far-Left journalists who are tirelessly working to overthrow the President of the United States and ruin the lives of everyone who voted for him.

But Donald Trump did say something questionable. He called James Alex Fields Jr., the man who allegedly drove a car that collided with a crowd of protesters and killed one person, a “murderer.” He thundered:

“I want to know the facts. The driver of the car is a disgrace to himself, his family, and his country. You can call it terrorism. You can call it murder. You can call it whatever you want. And then you get into legal semantics. The driver of the car is a murderer, and what he did is a horrible thing.”

[Trump: The Driver Of The Car Is A Disgrace To His Country, “Terrorist,” Murderer, by Tim Hains, RealClearPolitics, August 15, 2017]

Needless to say, Trump will get no credit for these words. And perhaps he shouldn’t. Especially when it follows a statement about wanting to “know the facts,” it is wildly premature to call James Fields a “murderer.” There is a surprisingly good chance he will be acquitted—or, perhaps more likely, convicted of a lesser offense such as manslaughter. This is exactly what happened with George Zimmerman, Officer Darren Wilson and a long list of other Main Stream Media lynching victims (including most notoriously South Charleston police officer Michael Slager, whose murder charges were ultimately dropped).

The key fact which the Main Stream Media is concealing: the Antifa Communists were allowed, and indeed, encouraged, to run wild and attack people after the police broke up the #UniteTheRight rally. This included taking over the streets, something you would think would not be allowed after Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe had declared a “State of Emergency” i n order to break up the rally. As Rebel Media’s Faith Goldy pointed out on the scene, this was a blatant double standard.

Not surprisingly, when heavily armed far-Left psychopaths are marching around looking for people to attack, there is violence. And this includes attacking people in cars. Antifa and Black Lives Matter activists have long practiced trapping people in cars before attacking them. An eyewitness reported that this was precisely what was being done to James Fields. Taylor Lorenz of The Hill made several points:

  • Protesters were chasing and attacking several cars
  • She herself was punched (ironically, though journalists shamelessly shill for them, Antifa often attack journalists because they don’t want their violence caught on camera)
  • Police at the station “think the guy running people down wasn’t malicious” and was “scared”

For good reason.

Though there are many conspiracy theories out there, let’s accept that Fields was the driver. He plowed into the crowd, and then, damningly, backed up and hit more people.

However, video evidence shows his car was quickly set upon by a mob wielding bats, who smashed his back windows and would presumably have smashed his skull had he not backed out quickly. That’s clearly self-defense.

What about the initial plunge into the crowd? Video evidence shows the car was struck before hitting anyone—meaning Fields could have panicked and hit the gas.

Most importantly, he did not accelerate after hitting the crowd, he braked and paused. He threw the car into reverse only when his window was smashed.

Fields’ car also shows signs of having sustained damage before encountering the crowd—meaning a confused and frightened Fields was driving around a town he didn’t know, perhaps chased by Antifa, and then hit the gas when his car was struck. Already, there are reports saying that just this occurred [Eyewitnesses: James Fields’ Car Was ‘Attacked,’ Police Set Up Rally-Goers To Be Assaulted, by Patrick Howley, Big League Politics, August 14, 2017]

And obviously, regardless of the exact circumstances, none of this would have happened had Charlottesville police simply done (or been allowed to do) their job and prevented riots in the streets.

Of course, Fields does appear to be a troubled kid. Though all groups at the rally deny he was a member, he was apparently not there by happenstance. [Alleged driver of car that plowed into Charlottesville crowd was a Nazi sympathizer, former teacher says, by T. Rees Shapiro, Alice Crites, Laura Vozzella, and John Woddrow Cox, Washington Post, August 13, 2017] He allegedly threatened his own mothr. [‘Very threatening’: Mother of Charlottesville suspect James A. Fields called 911 twice, by Arelis Hernandez, Jack Gillum, Michael Miller and Steve Hendrix, Washington Post, August 14, 2017] He flunked out of the Army and may suffer from mental disorders, including schizophrenia. [What We Know About James Alex Fields, the Driver Charged In The Charlottesville Attack, by Margaret Hartmann, New York, August 14, 2017]

Of course his politics will be presented as relevant in the trial, used to support the motive that Fields ruthlessly and deliberately tried to kill as many people as possible. But is this really relevant?

Consider the case of Epic Beard Man, Thomas Bruso, an older white man who was accosted on a bus and defended himself against a black man, becoming an Internet celebrity. Though Bruso did not start the fight, he used Politically Incorrect language and apparently had a history of mental illness.

Should he have been convicted of a crime? Of course not. And in fact he was not.

Similarly, Fields may have views that many people consider repugnant. He may have committed actions in his past that are deeply troubling or even disgusting. But the key question in the upcoming trial is not whether he is a good or bad person, but whether he was attacked and in fear for his life.

Certainly it seems unquestionable at this point that the Narrative claiming he deliberately tried to kill his as many people as possible by backing up is totally false.

What remains to be seen is what happened in the critical seconds not captured on video, before Fields approached the crowd in his car. These will determine whether he was trying to run the crowd down or just to escape.

Needless to say, many people will not care about this. They will simply insist Fields must be convicted because he allegedly has “racist” sympathies, attended a “racist” rally, and put himself in a position where he was likely to be attacked.

Which of course was the MSM case against George Zimmerman. He was quickly pronounced guilty by the MSM after the death of Trayvon Martin. The MSM argument: Zimmerman should never have approached Martin, that in some way he had brought Martin’s attack on himself. And the FBI’s investigation included interviewing witnesses to determine whether George Zimmerman was a “racist”. [Witnesses tell FBI that George Zimmerman is no racist, by Ashley Hayes, CNN, July 13, 2012]. They could find no evidence he was.

(Presumably, if they had, Zimmerman would have met a different fate. It’s called Equal Justice).

Obviously, the evidence already exists to suggest Fields is “racist,” whatever that means in today’s hysterically anti-white society. Indeed, with the all the video evidence already in the public domain and all the other evidence that will emerge during the investigation, Fields’s “racism” may be the only real evidence the prosecution has for the charge of murder.

If Fields is acquitted, or convicted of a lesser charge, this country may see further riots like the ones that followed the acquittal of the officers who arrested Rodney King—which apparently scared our Ruling Class permanentl y

But if Fields is convicted of murder, it may be another example of a System using “exemplary sentencing” to tell Whites this isn’t their country any more—and that the Constitution no longer applies to those who have the wrong, Politically Incorrect, opinions.

James Kirkpatrick [Email him] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc.

(Republished from VDare.com by permission of author or representative)
 
    []
  1. Nazi Shmazi….The Antifas voted twice for the homosexual Kenya Foriegner Obama….2008-2012…who gave the order to carry out a Neo-Nazi Coup in the Ukraine that resulted in the death of nearly 30 thousand Anti-Nazi Christian Russians in the Eastern Ukraine.

    Moreover, The Charlottesville Antifas voted for the bulldyke Hillary Clinton who created Al Queda…look at the video of Hillary Clinton admitting to this on Noam Chomsky’s twitter feed…..and ISIS….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /article/narrative-collapse-is-charlottesvilles-james-alex-fields-the-next-george-zimmerman/#comment-1970398
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Randal says:

    All shows the importance of not taking anything the mainstream media says as any basis for pronouncements in the immediate aftermath of any incident involving political correctness issues. They will always lie as they did in this case, making out this was a deliberate attack by a racist psychopath, and that initial lie then shapes the public political response.

    The case for a full and in depth Federal investigation of the events of the day, starting with the decisions of the local government and police authorities appears overwhelming. But who could actually be trusted to carry out such an investigation without an inherent bias against badthinkers?

    Read More
    • Replies: @helena
    Televised trial
    , @anonymous
    such a cynic you are.

    The crimes of the Nazees were far worse, but the Nuremberg trials managed to deliver fair and impartial verdicts, didn't they?

    Didn't they??

    Just to show how thoroughly the Nuremberg Trials supported equal justice and American Constitutional values, even Jules Streicher was hanged for writing nasty things about Jews. That was fitting indeed and just, wasn't it?
    , @Skeptikal
    I have no real opinion on Fields. Don't know enough about him/the incident.
    However.
    The linked video, which I have seen elsewhere too, shows a gang of guys with bats chasing up to the car and starting to bash it. This gang looks as though it was already formed and running after the car before the car entered the video, and before the gang entered the video, chasing the car. To me, what is striking is not that some guys chased the car but that this looks like a cohesive group already chasing the car. Thus, what the video shows could be interpreted to mean that this gang was chasing the car, the driver speeded up, ran into pedestrians, stopped, the gang caught up with the car and started/continued to bash it, the car then reversed on top of the gang members.
    , @Kevin C.

    But who could actually be trusted to carry out such an investigation without an inherent bias against badthinkers?
     
    Nobody. Which is why no such investigation will happen.
  3. Randal says:

    Kirkpatrick’s headline from April now seems pretty prophetic: “The Battle(s) of Berkeley–Someone Is Going to Get Killed. Where Is Trump?”.

    The failure to put the blame for such violence where it belongs – on the leftist aggressors who are simply incapable of accepting that people they hate have the right to express opinions they hate – enabled the Charlottesville local authorities to withhold police protection from lawful demonstrators in a situation in which violence by the aforementioned left was inevitable, and to allow those leftist aggressors the freedom of the streets, with the probable intention of gaining political capital from the resulting violence.

    As a result there has indeed been a death. Most likely caused by someone legitimately put in fear for his own life by those same leftist thugs.

    Read More
    • Agree: KenH
    • Replies: @David
    Hitler had this interesting thing to say:

    This state of affairs compelled us to take the work of safeguarding our meetings into our own hands. No reliance could be placed on official protection. On the contrary; experience showed that such protection always favoured only the disturbers. The only real outcome of police intervention would be that the meeting would be dissolved, that is to say, closed. And that is precisely what our opponents granted.

    Generally speaking, this led the police to adopt a procedure which, to say the least, was a most infamous sample of official malpractice. The moment they received information of a threat that the one or other
    meeting was to be broken up, instead of arresting the would-be disturbers, they promptly advised the innocent parties that the meeting was forbidden. This step the police proclaimed as a 'precautionary measure in the interests of law and order'.
     

  4. KenH says:

    Our virtue signaling and cucking attorney general said the car attack was domestic tear-izm without knowing any of the salient facts other than the driver’s right wing political orientation. The blame for the riots that resulted in the one death and dozens of injuries, some serious, should be laid at the feet of Mac Daddy McCauliffe, the Bill Deblasio Jr. Jewish mayor, black panther vice mayor and black police chief. It was their willful mishandling of event security that set off the chain of events leading up to the death by car.

    The fate of Reginald Denny is what flashed through my mind when I initially heard of this incident. Reginald slowed way down and didn’t want to hurt anyone and almost got killed in the process of being a good, slow driving samaritan.

    If this was a clear cut case of self defense to escape the howling, gesticulating mob of violent antifags then James Fields had no choice but to channel his inner Muslim. Even some comprehensive self defense courses teach you to use the car as a weapon if your life is in danger and there’s no other means of escape.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    All good points.

    This is where Trump disappoints. A real leader would have kept his trap shut about "evil Nazis" and set his own people to investigate the Mayor, the antifa paymasters and everyone else. From my perspective, the most powerful World politician looks powerless and uninformed so far.
    , @Greg Bacon

    If this was a clear cut case of self defense to escape the howling, gesticulating mob of violent antifags then James Fields had no choice but to channel his inner Muslim.
     
    Fields mother is Jewish, making Fields a Chosen One by birth, so how could he channel his inner Muslim?
    , @SMK
    Yesterday night, when discussing the Muslim terrorist attach in Barcelona, not only the anchors and guests on CNN and MSNBC but also Juan Williams, unsurprisingly, and a stupid white female I've never seen before on "The Five" or anywhere else, equated the atrocity that killed 13 people, as of then, and injured dozens more, many in "serious condition," with James Field, probably acting in self-defense when attacked by "antifa" and BLM fanatics, killing a women protester. Some even called the Islamic mass-murder in Spain a "copy-cat" terrorist act, including the stupid woman on "The Five." Yes, the Muslim terrorist in Barcelona was inspired by and "copying" the "Nazi" and "white supremacist" crime of James Fields, not the terrorist mass-murder in Nice when a Muslim fanatic stole a truck and murdered almost a hundred people, including a 4-year-old girl, and hundreds of other acts of Islamic terrorism.
  5. I was in Los Angeles in 1992. Like KenH I immediately thought of Reginald Denny when reading this story. We’ll see if Fields is the next Zimmerman. I am disgusted with Sessions.

    Read More
  6. helena says:
    @Randal
    All shows the importance of not taking anything the mainstream media says as any basis for pronouncements in the immediate aftermath of any incident involving political correctness issues. They will always lie as they did in this case, making out this was a deliberate attack by a racist psychopath, and that initial lie then shapes the public political response.

    The case for a full and in depth Federal investigation of the events of the day, starting with the decisions of the local government and police authorities appears overwhelming. But who could actually be trusted to carry out such an investigation without an inherent bias against badthinkers?

    Televised trial

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal
    The advantage of that is certainly that any bias will be more likely to be visible.
  7. Randal says:
    @helena
    Televised trial

    The advantage of that is certainly that any bias will be more likely to be visible.

    Read More
  8. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    What laypeople know — I have witnessed it across a number of fora — is that in Charlottesville White Supremacists caused incidents and practised violence.

    Nobody else.

    I don’t read/watch the MSM, but can infer the degree of falseness of their accounts by people’s beliefs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    A documented case: "Charlottesville Postmortem: This Was Not an Isolated Event, It Was an Extremist Reaction."http://www.globalresearch.ca/charlottesville-postmortem-this-was-not-an-isolated-event-it-was-an-extremist-reaction/5604057
    "For the last two years, the media and the anti-Trump masses have mostly remained silent on the political violence coming from the [Neocon] “left”. In fact, it seems as if the institutionalized media has condoned and celebrated the violence and repeatedly have dubbed them“peaceful demonstrations”. Meanwhile, isolated events of Trump supporters engaging in political violence, primarily during the 2016 campaign was shown on a near continuous loop on all media outlets."
  9. Why is it the first and only video we saw for the first 24hrs or so was from the absolute most damning angle? What separates this from Zimmerman or any of the others is the multitude of people filming that day. The media chose which film to show American mass media consumers.

    This fact alone takes me about 99% of the way toward acquitting Fields. Like his apparent role model Dick Spencer, Fields appears to be a complete pussy who will always run rather than fight (but insists on his right to stand at a street corner shouting “gas the kikes!” in Brooklyn). So a moron pussy. But if we are going to bury society’s failures, shouldn’t we start with those robbing, assaulting, raping, and murdering on a constant basis? When it’s safe for a woman, any woman (but especially say MY wife or daughter), to walk the streets of a major American city alone at night then I might have the energy to be worried about sexually ambiguous agitating idiots who happen to kill someone in a crowd trying to kill them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    "first and only video we saw "

    Anybody here could recommend an analysis of available videos. So far what I found on YT is fragmentary and rather of dubious quality (in terms of arguments).
    , @BenKenobi
    Well f'n said.
    , @MarkinLA
    complete pussy who will always run rather than fight

    Sorry Charlie but fighting the government by yourself just puts you in prison even if you are innocent,. There are plenty of examples in the gun rights battle.

    When the Canadians were forced to register their guns they refused and had big rallies in the western provinces where thousands of demonstrators mocked the government and dared them to arrest them all. The gun registry collapsed.

    When one guy in Oklahoma took an AR-15 and made it fully auto and signed statement that he would never take it out of Oklahoma and walked into a federal office, he was still convicted of having an illegal machine gun on the 1932 NFA which was based on the interstate commerce clause. When it went to the 5th Circuit, they came back with some idiotic doubletalk about how the law needed to apply intrastate or it would be effectively useless intrastate. They guy spent 10 years in a federal prison.

    It would be good if the right could march and produce something like what the Canadians got. However, at this point, the police would bust open your head, and you would still be facing felony charges for domestic terrorism if you didn't disperse when the cops told you to.
  10. A man posted a comment on another site that stated the police had shut down the rally an hour before Fields drove into a crowd and the rally participants had all left. There were no rally participants in the vicinity of the lefties, who were conducting a march down a street and came to a neighborhood whose residents did not want them to enter, so the lefties were milling around in an intersection when Fields drove into the crowd.

    The Kirkpatrick version above states that some of the lefties were attacking cars and might have attacked Fields’ car, causing him to panic and attempt to escape. It seems unlikely that Fields planned an attack on this march, which according the post I cite, occurred an hour after the end of the rally in a different location. The video shows lefties attacking Fields’ car before he backed up.

    Eyewitness testimony is of course unreliable, but if only lefties and some residents were around the scene, phone videos may not be offered.

    I checked media sources after the event and observed a universal rush to a judgement that Fields had committed a terrorist atttack — in the absence of any evidence about what his motive might have been. Sessions was reported to have said that the occurrence satisfied the requirements of the relevant terrorism statute.

    Read More
  11. Read More
    • Agree: Dieter Kief
    • Replies: @utu
    Good for Coulter.
    , @Clark Westwood
    Thanks for linking to that terrific column.

    Thank God Donald J. Trump is our president, and not Mitt Romney, not Marco Rubio and not that nasty woman.
     
    Amen to that.
  12. utu says:
    @Priss Factor
    Coulter doesn't fall for the Love Club.

    https://www.amren.com/commentary/2017/08/unite-the-right-political-violence-leftists-ann-coulter/

    Good for Coulter.

    Read More
  13. utu says:
    @Stan d Mute
    Why is it the first and only video we saw for the first 24hrs or so was from the absolute most damning angle? What separates this from Zimmerman or any of the others is the multitude of people filming that day. The media chose which film to show American mass media consumers.

    This fact alone takes me about 99% of the way toward acquitting Fields. Like his apparent role model Dick Spencer, Fields appears to be a complete pussy who will always run rather than fight (but insists on his right to stand at a street corner shouting "gas the kikes!" in Brooklyn). So a moron pussy. But if we are going to bury society's failures, shouldn't we start with those robbing, assaulting, raping, and murdering on a constant basis? When it's safe for a woman, any woman (but especially say MY wife or daughter), to walk the streets of a major American city alone at night then I might have the energy to be worried about sexually ambiguous agitating idiots who happen to kill someone in a crowd trying to kill them.

    “first and only video we saw ”

    Anybody here could recommend an analysis of available videos. So far what I found on YT is fragmentary and rather of dubious quality (in terms of arguments).

    Read More
  14. utu says:

    Something fishy about the incident:

    Charlottesville in 2 Takes, with 2 Cameras, shows 2 Scenes

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvyeHws7zWk

    Charlottesville False Flag Car Terror- Police Cleared Just Before, No Injuries After – Graphic

    CharlottesVille False Flag Hoax. Analysis of various footage

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2G9-icrBe1E

    Read More
  15. Realist says:

    For those of us that thought White Nationalists had a friend in Steve Bannon, here is his latest comment.

    Bannon dismissed the far-right as irrelevant:

    “Ethno-nationalism—it’s losers. It’s a fringe element. I think the media plays it up too much, and we gotta help crush it, you know, uh, help crush it more.”

    “These guys are a collection of clowns,” he added.

    Read More
  16. It certainly doesn’t look like a Dallas shooting-style premeditated terror attack. He was probably in fear of his life. His action was probably not defensible, inasmuch as not everyone in that hate-filled crowd was trying to kill him, and the people attacking his car were unlikely to be the same ones he drove into. He probably committed a crime I would guess, but certainly the authorities should take the primary blame for setting this up when it’s their job to secure the peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    It certainly doesn’t look like a Dallas shooting-style premeditated terror attack.

    I think the fact that the only person he killed was a white woman would tell most people that, if they were thinking.

    And the fact that he didn't use one of the many guns at the event would tell you he didn't have any help.

    But you know how people are.
  17. Yeah, Sessions is disappointing, but what else can he do in the current environment but feed red meat to the dogs. We are not, after all, being led by men of courage and strength, like Washinton, Jefferson, Lee and either of the two Jacksons (Andrew and Stonewall).

    Read More
  18. After seeing blood lust, the extreme far left terrorists demonstrated against the statue, I dread to think what they would have done to the driver of the car.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    The Obama loyalists (including the neocon antifa) are blind and deaf to the Obama-spawned Nazi revival in Ukraine:
    http://theduran.com/ukraine-erects-a-new-fascist-statue-and-america-remains-silent/

    'The Ukrainian regime authorities have unveiled a statue honoring the fighters who are engaged in an aggressive war of ethnic cleansing against the people of Donbass. .... This just one of many monuments that have recently been erected in Ukraine which celebrate the fascist ideology and murderous Nazi collaborators, including the infamous Stepan Bandera whose followers massacred Russians, Soviet Ukrainians, Poles and Jews.
    ... the same American politicians criticizing Trump for allegedly not being hard enough on the so-called fascist right in the US, are those who continue to support a regime in Ukraine that is the closet thing to pure, classical fascism a near-European country..."
  19. jim jones says:
    Read More
    • Replies: @40 Acres and A Kardashian

    ZH says the protestors were paid
     
    Yeah, well, ZH also says that there's no such thing as nuclear weapons, and all those stories about Nagasaki and Hiroshima are hoaxes perpetrated by the media and the government.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-06/atom-bomb-anniversary-youre-being-lied-about-hiroshima-and-much-more

  20. If Trump and his supporters are a bunch of ‘Nazis’, then Jews should NOT ask them to support Israel and Zionism. After all, why would Jews want precious little Israel to be supported by ‘Hitler’ and ‘storm-troopers’?

    It is funny that Zionists denounce Trump and his supporters as ‘Nazis’ but demand that they support Israel. What kind of crazy Jew would want a Jewish state to be defended by Hitler and Nazis?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Moi
    Our perception is shaped by the media (to a large degree) and the people who own/contr0l the media.
    , @jacques sheete

    What kind of crazy Jew would want a Jewish state to be defended by Hitler and Nazis?
     
    The Nazis had the support of some Zionists including the Zionist banker, George Kareski and others. Of course, as is typical, today's liars will deny all of it.


    “… Zionist leaders … made a point of displaying abysmal contempt for their Jewish brothers and sisters by actively participating in their extermination.”

    Rabbi Gedalya Liebermann – Australia, THE ROLE OF ZIONISM IN THE HOLOCAUST
    http://www.truetorahjews.org/lieberman
     
  21. unit472 says:

    Whatever the facts turn out to be concerning Mr. Fields the more important issue is the tendency of the Democrat party to be nothing more than the modern equivalent of a ‘lynch mob’. How else to explain this sudden obsession with destroying Confederate monuments more than 150 years after the end of the Civil War?

    For those of a certain age the memory of the hula hoop or yo yo comes to mind. At some point in the late 1950′s a toy maker came out with the hula hoop. Maybe it had something to do with Hawaii becoming a state but in any event this plastic hula hoop appeared everywhere out of nowhere. A few years later another toy company was able to revive the yo yo and soon every kid had a yo yo dangling from their finger. These ‘fads’ were incredible marketing successes for the toy makers and harmless fun for the children caught up in the craze but are we to take seriously a political party and news media that offers up nothing but the same sort of mindless faddishness?

    This ‘group think’ craze isn’t new either. Rush Limbaugh has used it to great effect on a number of occcasions making audio loops of top Democrats all repeating the ‘buzzword’ du jour. Remember how Dick Cheney was always mentioned in conjunction with the word ‘gravitas’? A word that was almost never used in casual discourse suddenly was issuing daily from the mouths of Democrats everywhere.

    This sort of top down political discourse is what is so dangerous about the modern Democrat party. It is a totalitarian movement where thinking is replaced with mindless mob behavior.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal

    the more important issue is the tendency of the Democrat party to be nothing more than the modern equivalent of a ‘lynch mob’.....This sort of top down political discourse is what is so dangerous about the modern Democrat party. It is a totalitarian movement where thinking is replaced with mindless mob behavior.
     
    Except that you can include the likes of Rubio, the Bushes, and all the rest of the virtue-signalling Republican party elite, and most of the US's big business elites, who have all rushed to side with the left over Charlottesville.

    The problem is much bigger than the Democrat Party alone.
    , @helena
    In the Marxist West, Leftists dictate who can do, say, or think what. Regardless of whether the Left is in government or not.
    , @jacques sheete

    This sort of top down political discourse is what is so dangerous about the modern Democrat party. It is a totalitarian movement where thinking is replaced with mindless mob behavior.
     
    Good comments except for the above which is half correct. It applies to the Republikans as well.
  22. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    Why was a Beverly Hills, CA supplying thugs, sorry, ‘actors’ to the Charlottesville riot and paying them $25 per hour?

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-16/why-was-crowd-hire-company-recruiting-25-hour-political-activists-charlotte-last-wee

    Who hired the supplier of thugs to the Unite Right event and why is the AntiFa flag a mirror opposite of the 1933 Communist Party of Germany?

    Read More
    • Replies: @BenKenobi
    cuz we're s'posed to go full Nazi and carry out Pike's third war, duh.

    I say we knowingly take the bait and try to turn the tables in the ensuing chaos.
  23. GregD says:

    There’s absolutely no excuse for having a balanced view regarding violence by Marxist globalist antifa lunatics who have been threatening those with whom they disagree with death, burning down buildings, smashing windows, attacking people with bats and Molotov cocktails while wearing ninja costumes as equally culpable as a group who carried some flags and wear costumes with pointy hats, one of whom drove recklessly and killed someone “who was wonderful”. Ignore the fact that the defensive group was protesting legally and the police, instructed by the local mayor, did nothing to protect them from the “alt-left” thugs. Also don’t even look into the possibility that the ones with the swastikas and the ones with pointing hoods may have been agitators sent in by some (((puppeteer))) to instigate riot. Then set about oppressing all protests from the anti-globalist nationalists as neo-Nazi reactionary evil.

    Read More
  24. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @KenH
    Our virtue signaling and cucking attorney general said the car attack was domestic tear-izm without knowing any of the salient facts other than the driver's right wing political orientation. The blame for the riots that resulted in the one death and dozens of injuries, some serious, should be laid at the feet of Mac Daddy McCauliffe, the Bill Deblasio Jr. Jewish mayor, black panther vice mayor and black police chief. It was their willful mishandling of event security that set off the chain of events leading up to the death by car.

    The fate of Reginald Denny is what flashed through my mind when I initially heard of this incident. Reginald slowed way down and didn't want to hurt anyone and almost got killed in the process of being a good, slow driving samaritan.

    If this was a clear cut case of self defense to escape the howling, gesticulating mob of violent antifags then James Fields had no choice but to channel his inner Muslim. Even some comprehensive self defense courses teach you to use the car as a weapon if your life is in danger and there's no other means of escape.

    All good points.

    This is where Trump disappoints. A real leader would have kept his trap shut about “evil Nazis” and set his own people to investigate the Mayor, the antifa paymasters and everyone else. From my perspective, the most powerful World politician looks powerless and uninformed so far.

    Read More
  25. Greg Bacon says: • Website
    @KenH
    Our virtue signaling and cucking attorney general said the car attack was domestic tear-izm without knowing any of the salient facts other than the driver's right wing political orientation. The blame for the riots that resulted in the one death and dozens of injuries, some serious, should be laid at the feet of Mac Daddy McCauliffe, the Bill Deblasio Jr. Jewish mayor, black panther vice mayor and black police chief. It was their willful mishandling of event security that set off the chain of events leading up to the death by car.

    The fate of Reginald Denny is what flashed through my mind when I initially heard of this incident. Reginald slowed way down and didn't want to hurt anyone and almost got killed in the process of being a good, slow driving samaritan.

    If this was a clear cut case of self defense to escape the howling, gesticulating mob of violent antifags then James Fields had no choice but to channel his inner Muslim. Even some comprehensive self defense courses teach you to use the car as a weapon if your life is in danger and there's no other means of escape.

    If this was a clear cut case of self defense to escape the howling, gesticulating mob of violent antifags then James Fields had no choice but to channel his inner Muslim.

    Fields mother is Jewish, making Fields a Chosen One by birth, so how could he channel his inner Muslim?

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH

    so how could he channel his inner Muslim?
     
    It's called humor and figurative language. In case you missed it a few Muslims have been using trucks as lethal weapons in Europe and Sweden.

    But I think Fields should convert to Islam forthwith since then then the media and FBI will be unable to or discern motive or assess guilt and Jeff Sessions will have to downgrade the incident from domestic tear-uh-izm to workplace violence.

    , @Henry's Cat

    Fields mother is Jewish....
     
    I noticed her surname is Bloom, but have you got anything in addition to that?
  26. Randal says:
    @unit472
    Whatever the facts turn out to be concerning Mr. Fields the more important issue is the tendency of the Democrat party to be nothing more than the modern equivalent of a 'lynch mob'. How else to explain this sudden obsession with destroying Confederate monuments more than 150 years after the end of the Civil War?

    For those of a certain age the memory of the hula hoop or yo yo comes to mind. At some point in the late 1950's a toy maker came out with the hula hoop. Maybe it had something to do with Hawaii becoming a state but in any event this plastic hula hoop appeared everywhere out of nowhere. A few years later another toy company was able to revive the yo yo and soon every kid had a yo yo dangling from their finger. These 'fads' were incredible marketing successes for the toy makers and harmless fun for the children caught up in the craze but are we to take seriously a political party and news media that offers up nothing but the same sort of mindless faddishness?

    This 'group think' craze isn't new either. Rush Limbaugh has used it to great effect on a number of occcasions making audio loops of top Democrats all repeating the 'buzzword' du jour. Remember how Dick Cheney was always mentioned in conjunction with the word 'gravitas'? A word that was almost never used in casual discourse suddenly was issuing daily from the mouths of Democrats everywhere.

    This sort of top down political discourse is what is so dangerous about the modern Democrat party. It is a totalitarian movement where thinking is replaced with mindless mob behavior.

    the more important issue is the tendency of the Democrat party to be nothing more than the modern equivalent of a ‘lynch mob’…..This sort of top down political discourse is what is so dangerous about the modern Democrat party. It is a totalitarian movement where thinking is replaced with mindless mob behavior.

    Except that you can include the likes of Rubio, the Bushes, and all the rest of the virtue-signalling Republican party elite, and most of the US’s big business elites, who have all rushed to side with the left over Charlottesville.

    The problem is much bigger than the Democrat Party alone.

    Read More
  27. mp says:

    All this talk about Charlottesville is missing the larger point that it is simply a cover for Jews at the large social media outlets, their cronies at PayPal, and local governments, to crack down on unapproved speech. I see Peter Brimelow is recently whining that he wasn’t even a part of the Unite the Right, but now he’s being unfairly affected. Memo to Brimelow: Stop weaseling and understand that your excuses don’t matter to Big Jew. You are just as guilty as Andrew Anglin in their eyes. All your words about “not supporting” violence will accompany your Internet presence to the electronic firing squad.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ex-Saffer
    The list of perps who have been sent to the firing squad in recent days is a long one:

    • Both Red Ice servers were hacked, as were the site owners’ Twitter accounts, and still have not recovered.
    • VDare, AltRight.com, and AmRen were bounced from PayPal.
    • VDare’s conference next April has been shut down by the venue.
    • TRS was taken down by their webhosting company, but got a new host and were back online in 3 hours.
    • Mike Enoch was banned for the fourth time from Twitter.
    • KickStarter, GoFundMe, and IndieGoGo have all vowed to shut down campaigns related to White Nationalist concerns.
    • Pax Dickinson’s Twitter has been shut down.
    • Hatreon is offline.
    • PolNewsForever’s Twitter has been shut down.
    • The Daily Stormer has been targeted with massive DDOS attacks.
    • The Daily Stormer domain registration was dropped by GoDaddy, transferred to Google, and then seized by Google.
    • The Daily Stormer discord server has been shut down.
    • The Altright.com discord server has been shut down.
    • Vanguard America’s WordPress account has been shut down.
    • RootBocks has been taken down by its hosting company.
    • Xurious has been removed from Bandcamp and Soundcloud.
    • Daniel Friberg and Christopher Dulny, both Swedes, have been barred from entering the United States because of their presence at Unite the Right.
    • Lauren Southern’s Instagram has been taken down.
    • NPI’s Paypal account has been shut down.
    • Two upcoming speeches by Richard Spencer have been canceled.
    • Identity Europa’s PayPal has been shut down.
    • Christopher Cantwell’s Facebook, PayPal, and website are gone.
    • Weev’s LinkedIn account has been shut down.
    • The Paranormies and other podcasts have been kicked off of Soundcloud.

    [List taken from Counter-Currents Publishing without permission.]

  28. KenH says:
    @Greg Bacon

    If this was a clear cut case of self defense to escape the howling, gesticulating mob of violent antifags then James Fields had no choice but to channel his inner Muslim.
     
    Fields mother is Jewish, making Fields a Chosen One by birth, so how could he channel his inner Muslim?

    so how could he channel his inner Muslim?

    It’s called humor and figurative language. In case you missed it a few Muslims have been using trucks as lethal weapons in Europe and Sweden.

    But I think Fields should convert to Islam forthwith since then then the media and FBI will be unable to or discern motive or assess guilt and Jeff Sessions will have to downgrade the incident from domestic tear-uh-izm to workplace violence.

    Read More
  29. David says:
    @Randal
    Kirkpatrick's headline from April now seems pretty prophetic: "The Battle(s) of Berkeley–Someone Is Going to Get Killed. Where Is Trump?".

    The failure to put the blame for such violence where it belongs - on the leftist aggressors who are simply incapable of accepting that people they hate have the right to express opinions they hate - enabled the Charlottesville local authorities to withhold police protection from lawful demonstrators in a situation in which violence by the aforementioned left was inevitable, and to allow those leftist aggressors the freedom of the streets, with the probable intention of gaining political capital from the resulting violence.

    As a result there has indeed been a death. Most likely caused by someone legitimately put in fear for his own life by those same leftist thugs.

    Hitler had this interesting thing to say:

    This state of affairs compelled us to take the work of safeguarding our meetings into our own hands. No reliance could be placed on official protection. On the contrary; experience showed that such protection always favoured only the disturbers. The only real outcome of police intervention would be that the meeting would be dissolved, that is to say, closed. And that is precisely what our opponents granted.

    Generally speaking, this led the police to adopt a procedure which, to say the least, was a most infamous sample of official malpractice. The moment they received information of a threat that the one or other
    meeting was to be broken up, instead of arresting the would-be disturbers, they promptly advised the innocent parties that the meeting was forbidden. This step the police proclaimed as a ‘precautionary measure in the interests of law and order’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal
    Pretty much a direct description of what happened at Charlottesville, of course.
    , @jacques sheete
    I have no doubt that Hitler said that and that it was such ideas, otherwise known as speaking the truth, that lead to his demise and the fact that he's cursed to this day by masses of ignorami who also and sadly, keep breeding.
    , @David
    Von Mises in Liberalism, 1927, has this discussion of the origins of Fascism. It's rather long so I didn't add it sooner. It supports Hitler's comment. I'm not a fan of Hitler, I'm just trying to guess where the current discord it taking us. I highlighted the most significant passages, especially his very wrong prediction at the end.

    Only when the Marxist Social Democrats had gained the upper hand and taken power in the belief that the age of liberalism and capitalism had passed forever did the last concessions disappear that it had still been thought necessary to make to the liberal ideology. The parties of the Third International consider any means as permissible if it seems to give promise of helping them in their struggle to achieve their ends. Whoever does not unconditionally acknowledge all their teachings as the only correct ones and stand by them through thick and thin has, in their opinion, incurred the penalty of death; and they do not hesitate to exterminate him and his whole family, infants included, whenever and wherever it is physically possible.

    The frank espousal of a policy of annihilating opponents and the murders committed in the pursuance of it have given rise to an opposition movement. All at once the scales fell from the eyes of the non-Communist enemies of liberalism. Until then they had believed that even in a struggle against a hateful opponent one still had to respect certain liberal principles. They had had, even though reluctantly, to exclude murder and assassination from the list of measures to be resorted to in political struggles. They had had to resign themselves to many limitations in persecuting the opposition press and in suppressing the spoken word. Now, all at once, they saw that opponents had risen up who gave no heed to such considerations and for whom any means was good enough to defeat an adversary. The militaristic and nationalistic enemies of the Third International felt themselves cheated by liberalism. Liberalism, they thought, stayed their hand when they desired to strike a blow against the revolutionary parties while it was still possible to do so. If liberalism had not hindered them, they would, so they believe, have bloodily nipped the revolutionary movements in the bud. Revolutionary ideas had been able to take root and flourish only because of the tolerance they had been accorded by their opponents, whose will power had been enfeebled by a regard for liberal principles that, as events subsequently proved, was overscrupulous. If the idea had occurred to them years ago that it is permissible to crush ruthlessly every revolutionary movement, the victories that the Third International has won since 1917 would never have been possible. For the militarists and nationalists believe that when it comes to shooting and fighting, they themselves are the most accurate marksmen and the most adroit fighters.

    The fundamental idea of these movements—which, from the name of the most grandiose and tightly disciplined among them, the Italian, may, in general, be designated as Fascist—consists in the proposal to make use of the same unscrupulous methods in the struggle against the Third International as the latter employs against its opponents. The Third International seeks to exterminate its adversaries and their ideas in the same way that the hygienist strives to exterminate a pestilential bacillus; it considers itself in no way bound by the terms of any compact that it may conclude with opponents, and it deems any crime, any lie, and any calumny permissible in carrying on its struggle. The Fascists, at least in principle, profess the same intentions. That they have not yet succeeded as fully as the Russian Bolsheviks in freeing themselves from a certain regard for liberal notions and ideas and traditional ethical precepts is to be attributed solely to the fact that the Fascists carry on their work among nations in which the intellectual and moral heritage of some thousands of years of civilization cannot be destroyed at one blow, and not among the barbarian peoples on both sides of the Urals, whose relationship to civilization has never been any other than that of marauding denizens of forest and desert accustomed to engage, from time to time, in predatory raids on civilized lands in the hunt for booty. Because of this difference, Fascism will never succeed as completely as Russian Bolshevism in freeing itself from the power of liberal ideas. Only under the fresh impression of the murders and atrocities perpetrated by the supporters of the Soviets were Germans and Italians able to block out the remembrance of the traditional restraints of justice and morality and find the impulse to bloody counteraction. The deeds of the Fascists and of other parties corresponding to them were emotional reflex actions evoked by indignation at the deeds of the Bolsheviks and Communists. As soon as the first flush of anger had passed, their policy took a more moderate course and will probably become even more so with the passage of time.
     
  30. helena says:
    @unit472
    Whatever the facts turn out to be concerning Mr. Fields the more important issue is the tendency of the Democrat party to be nothing more than the modern equivalent of a 'lynch mob'. How else to explain this sudden obsession with destroying Confederate monuments more than 150 years after the end of the Civil War?

    For those of a certain age the memory of the hula hoop or yo yo comes to mind. At some point in the late 1950's a toy maker came out with the hula hoop. Maybe it had something to do with Hawaii becoming a state but in any event this plastic hula hoop appeared everywhere out of nowhere. A few years later another toy company was able to revive the yo yo and soon every kid had a yo yo dangling from their finger. These 'fads' were incredible marketing successes for the toy makers and harmless fun for the children caught up in the craze but are we to take seriously a political party and news media that offers up nothing but the same sort of mindless faddishness?

    This 'group think' craze isn't new either. Rush Limbaugh has used it to great effect on a number of occcasions making audio loops of top Democrats all repeating the 'buzzword' du jour. Remember how Dick Cheney was always mentioned in conjunction with the word 'gravitas'? A word that was almost never used in casual discourse suddenly was issuing daily from the mouths of Democrats everywhere.

    This sort of top down political discourse is what is so dangerous about the modern Democrat party. It is a totalitarian movement where thinking is replaced with mindless mob behavior.

    In the Marxist West, Leftists dictate who can do, say, or think what. Regardless of whether the Left is in government or not.

    Read More
  31. annamaria says:
    @Anonymous
    What laypeople know -- I have witnessed it across a number of fora -- is that in Charlottesville White Supremacists caused incidents and practised violence.

    Nobody else.

    I don't read/watch the MSM, but can infer the degree of falseness of their accounts by people's beliefs.

    A documented case: “Charlottesville Postmortem: This Was Not an Isolated Event, It Was an Extremist Reaction.”http://www.globalresearch.ca/charlottesville-postmortem-this-was-not-an-isolated-event-it-was-an-extremist-reaction/5604057
    “For the last two years, the media and the anti-Trump masses have mostly remained silent on the political violence coming from the [Neocon] “left”. In fact, it seems as if the institutionalized media has condoned and celebrated the violence and repeatedly have dubbed them“peaceful demonstrations”. Meanwhile, isolated events of Trump supporters engaging in political violence, primarily during the 2016 campaign was shown on a near continuous loop on all media outlets.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @fnn
    From a radical left website, no less. But maybe not surprising since they're against the anti-Russia hysteria.
  32. Moi says:
    @Priss Factor
    If Trump and his supporters are a bunch of 'Nazis', then Jews should NOT ask them to support Israel and Zionism. After all, why would Jews want precious little Israel to be supported by 'Hitler' and 'storm-troopers'?

    It is funny that Zionists denounce Trump and his supporters as 'Nazis' but demand that they support Israel. What kind of crazy Jew would want a Jewish state to be defended by Hitler and Nazis?

    Our perception is shaped by the media (to a large degree) and the people who own/contr0l the media.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Our perception is shaped by the media (to a large degree) and the people who own/contr0l the media.
     
    Here's an article about Nazi-Zionist collaboration that would agree with you and add detail to your comment besides showing how the media is complicit in covering it up.

    There is detailed evidence that some Zionists collaborated with the Nazis, that Zionists sabotaged anti-Nazi boycotts, and that Zionists interfered with efforts to rescue victims of Nazi oppression.
    When facts first emerged in the 1950s about Zionist-Nazi collusion, it caused considerable scandal in Israel and led to the fall of the Israeli government of the time…
    Popular American playwright and fervent Zionist Ben Hecht wrote the first book on the subject, “Perfidy,” relating the history of a Hungarian Zionist leader who arranged for his family and several hundred prominent Jews to escape while facilitating the movement of the rest of Hungarian Jews to Nazi concentration camps.

    -ALISON WEIR, Denying Nazi-Zionist Collusion

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2011/03/04/denying-nazi-zionist-collusion/
     
  33. Randal says:
    @David
    Hitler had this interesting thing to say:

    This state of affairs compelled us to take the work of safeguarding our meetings into our own hands. No reliance could be placed on official protection. On the contrary; experience showed that such protection always favoured only the disturbers. The only real outcome of police intervention would be that the meeting would be dissolved, that is to say, closed. And that is precisely what our opponents granted.

    Generally speaking, this led the police to adopt a procedure which, to say the least, was a most infamous sample of official malpractice. The moment they received information of a threat that the one or other
    meeting was to be broken up, instead of arresting the would-be disturbers, they promptly advised the innocent parties that the meeting was forbidden. This step the police proclaimed as a 'precautionary measure in the interests of law and order'.
     

    Pretty much a direct description of what happened at Charlottesville, of course.

    Read More
  34. Saxon says:

    He’s like the Zimzam in more ways than one. A “white male” who isn’t actually a white male since he’s jewish.

    Read More
  35. “Fields may have views that many people consider repugnant.”

    Yes. But how can someone’s “views”, i.e opinions, truly be repugnant if sincerely-held? I’m wondering what is happening to “freedom of conscience” in the West. A person’s views, whether left or right, should be presumed to be in good faith and not based on some sort of camouflaging of personal animus… until proven otherwise.

    The situation of having two groups that believe radically different things inhabiting the same country … can be dealt with … through ingenuity and compromise. But completely Anathematizing, delegitimizing, nay, criminalizing one side or the other does no good.

    Read More
  36. Ex-Saffer says:
    @mp
    All this talk about Charlottesville is missing the larger point that it is simply a cover for Jews at the large social media outlets, their cronies at PayPal, and local governments, to crack down on unapproved speech. I see Peter Brimelow is recently whining that he wasn't even a part of the Unite the Right, but now he's being unfairly affected. Memo to Brimelow: Stop weaseling and understand that your excuses don't matter to Big Jew. You are just as guilty as Andrew Anglin in their eyes. All your words about "not supporting" violence will accompany your Internet presence to the electronic firing squad.

    The list of perps who have been sent to the firing squad in recent days is a long one:

    • Both Red Ice servers were hacked, as were the site owners’ Twitter accounts, and still have not recovered.
    • VDare, AltRight.com, and AmRen were bounced from PayPal.
    • VDare’s conference next April has been shut down by the venue.
    • TRS was taken down by their webhosting company, but got a new host and were back online in 3 hours.
    • Mike Enoch was banned for the fourth time from Twitter.
    • KickStarter, GoFundMe, and IndieGoGo have all vowed to shut down campaigns related to White Nationalist concerns.
    • Pax Dickinson’s Twitter has been shut down.
    • Hatreon is offline.
    • PolNewsForever’s Twitter has been shut down.
    • The Daily Stormer has been targeted with massive DDOS attacks.
    • The Daily Stormer domain registration was dropped by GoDaddy, transferred to Google, and then seized by Google.
    • The Daily Stormer discord server has been shut down.
    • The Altright.com discord server has been shut down.
    • Vanguard America’s WordPress account has been shut down.
    • RootBocks has been taken down by its hosting company.
    • Xurious has been removed from Bandcamp and Soundcloud.
    • Daniel Friberg and Christopher Dulny, both Swedes, have been barred from entering the United States because of their presence at Unite the Right.
    • Lauren Southern’s Instagram has been taken down.
    • NPI’s Paypal account has been shut down.
    • Two upcoming speeches by Richard Spencer have been canceled.
    • Identity Europa’s PayPal has been shut down.
    • Christopher Cantwell’s Facebook, PayPal, and website are gone.
    • Weev’s LinkedIn account has been shut down.
    • The Paranormies and other podcasts have been kicked off of Soundcloud.

    [List taken from Counter-Currents Publishing without permission.]

    Read More
  37. A comment that Jared Huwhite Taylor won’t let through over at American Rennaisance comments for posting in the post-Charlottesville 2017 “America”

    Our Battle Hym:

    WE WILL NOT BE REPLACED!!!!

    THE HISTORIC NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN MAJORITY!!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Native Born White American Males are having a genocidal race war waged against them....Jared Taylor lectures the MSM that IQ tests demonstrate beyond a shadow of scientific doubt that Asian "Americans" are smarter than Native Born White Americans...
  38. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Also, check out that his stop lights are activated as he drives into the people.
    Why would he do that if he wanted to kill as many as possible?

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Why would he do that if he wanted to kill as many as possible?

    Maybe he's smarter than the average bear, knew that there would be video, and put in an element for his defense, certainly for mitigation purposes.
  39. @War for Blair Mountain
    A comment that Jared Huwhite Taylor won't let through over at American Rennaisance comments for posting in the post-Charlottesville 2017 "America"


    Our Battle Hym:


    WE WILL NOT BE REPLACED!!!!


    THE HISTORIC NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN MAJORITY!!!

    Native Born White American Males are having a genocidal race war waged against them….Jared Taylor lectures the MSM that IQ tests demonstrate beyond a shadow of scientific doubt that Asian “Americans” are smarter than Native Born White Americans…

    Read More
  40. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Also, if he wanted to kill as many as possible,
    why did he not drive into crowd but into the other car?

    Read More
  41. iffen says:
    @Anonymous
    Also, check out that his stop lights are activated as he drives into the people.
    Why would he do that if he wanted to kill as many as possible?

    Why would he do that if he wanted to kill as many as possible?

    Maybe he’s smarter than the average bear, knew that there would be video, and put in an element for his defense, certainly for mitigation purposes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Liberty Mike
    "Maybe he's smarter than the average bear....."

    Better apply the brakes on that proposition.
  42. @Priss Factor
    If Trump and his supporters are a bunch of 'Nazis', then Jews should NOT ask them to support Israel and Zionism. After all, why would Jews want precious little Israel to be supported by 'Hitler' and 'storm-troopers'?

    It is funny that Zionists denounce Trump and his supporters as 'Nazis' but demand that they support Israel. What kind of crazy Jew would want a Jewish state to be defended by Hitler and Nazis?

    What kind of crazy Jew would want a Jewish state to be defended by Hitler and Nazis?

    The Nazis had the support of some Zionists including the Zionist banker, George Kareski and others. Of course, as is typical, today’s liars will deny all of it.

    “… Zionist leaders … made a point of displaying abysmal contempt for their Jewish brothers and sisters by actively participating in their extermination.”

    Rabbi Gedalya Liebermann – Australia, THE ROLE OF ZIONISM IN THE HOLOCAUST

    http://www.truetorahjews.org/lieberman

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    More smoke & mirrors.

    The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

    The tide is turning.
     
    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”.
    Arthur Schopenhauer
  43. @Priss Factor
    Coulter doesn't fall for the Love Club.

    https://www.amren.com/commentary/2017/08/unite-the-right-political-violence-leftists-ann-coulter/

    Thanks for linking to that terrific column.

    Thank God Donald J. Trump is our president, and not Mitt Romney, not Marco Rubio and not that nasty woman.

    Amen to that.

    Read More
  44. fnn says:
    @annamaria
    A documented case: "Charlottesville Postmortem: This Was Not an Isolated Event, It Was an Extremist Reaction."http://www.globalresearch.ca/charlottesville-postmortem-this-was-not-an-isolated-event-it-was-an-extremist-reaction/5604057
    "For the last two years, the media and the anti-Trump masses have mostly remained silent on the political violence coming from the [Neocon] “left”. In fact, it seems as if the institutionalized media has condoned and celebrated the violence and repeatedly have dubbed them“peaceful demonstrations”. Meanwhile, isolated events of Trump supporters engaging in political violence, primarily during the 2016 campaign was shown on a near continuous loop on all media outlets."

    From a radical left website, no less. But maybe not surprising since they’re against the anti-Russia hysteria.

    Read More
  45. @Moi
    Our perception is shaped by the media (to a large degree) and the people who own/contr0l the media.

    Our perception is shaped by the media (to a large degree) and the people who own/contr0l the media.

    Here’s an article about Nazi-Zionist collaboration that would agree with you and add detail to your comment besides showing how the media is complicit in covering it up.

    There is detailed evidence that some Zionists collaborated with the Nazis, that Zionists sabotaged anti-Nazi boycotts, and that Zionists interfered with efforts to rescue victims of Nazi oppression.
    When facts first emerged in the 1950s about Zionist-Nazi collusion, it caused considerable scandal in Israel and led to the fall of the Israeli government of the time…
    Popular American playwright and fervent Zionist Ben Hecht wrote the first book on the subject, “Perfidy,” relating the history of a Hungarian Zionist leader who arranged for his family and several hundred prominent Jews to escape while facilitating the movement of the rest of Hungarian Jews to Nazi concentration camps.

    -ALISON WEIR, Denying Nazi-Zionist Collusion

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2011/03/04/denying-nazi-zionist-collusion/

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    For a detailed look at zionist collaboration with the German government, please obtain and read "51 Questions and Answers--Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis" by Lenni Brenner. In it you will find that the collaboration was much deeper than most realize.
    The zionists were hell-bent on getting massive jewish emigration to Palestine "by any means necessary" The jewish-run civil unrest of the day and the marginalization of German jews was all part of the plan. Making life uncomfortable for the "average" jew was necessary to complete the zionist plan. Hence, the "declaration of (economic) war" on Germany in 1933--yes, 1933 and with the publication of books such as "Germany Must Perish". What better way to marginalize the German jewish population.
    As jews were "the cream of German society", they were on top with banking, culture, and many large businesses, there was a natural reluctance to leave that all behind.
    To say the least, the zionists were not only successful in their attempts to spur emigration to Palestine, they created one of the greatest hoaxes in human history--the so-called "holocaust ™". The "holocaust ™" was the "linchpin" that made zionist successes possible. By demonizing the whole of Germany, zionists were able to not only get emigration going, and protecting their invention, communism, getting Germany and the allies to pay for it all--to this very day. As it stands now, there will always be "holocaust ™ survivors" as the jews are now claiming--holohoax (oops, I mean holocaust ™"), "transference"the wacky concept that "holocaust ™" memories are affecting their children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. Actually, this "transference" is thousands of years old, as it is a part of jewish psyche--the "eternal victim" syndrome. If jews did not have enemies, they would have to create them...
  46. @iffen
    Why would he do that if he wanted to kill as many as possible?

    Maybe he's smarter than the average bear, knew that there would be video, and put in an element for his defense, certainly for mitigation purposes.

    “Maybe he’s smarter than the average bear…..”

    Better apply the brakes on that proposition.

    Read More
  47. Steve Bannon

    You called the Alt Right losers yesterday….well, the Alt Right Native Born White American Racial Identity Politics that you find repellant allowed you to in a safe…clean…Lilly White neighborhood in 90 percent Majority NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICA during the 1960s…you fat greedy CUCK…

    Read More
  48. anarchyst says:
    @jacques sheete

    Our perception is shaped by the media (to a large degree) and the people who own/contr0l the media.
     
    Here's an article about Nazi-Zionist collaboration that would agree with you and add detail to your comment besides showing how the media is complicit in covering it up.

    There is detailed evidence that some Zionists collaborated with the Nazis, that Zionists sabotaged anti-Nazi boycotts, and that Zionists interfered with efforts to rescue victims of Nazi oppression.
    When facts first emerged in the 1950s about Zionist-Nazi collusion, it caused considerable scandal in Israel and led to the fall of the Israeli government of the time…
    Popular American playwright and fervent Zionist Ben Hecht wrote the first book on the subject, “Perfidy,” relating the history of a Hungarian Zionist leader who arranged for his family and several hundred prominent Jews to escape while facilitating the movement of the rest of Hungarian Jews to Nazi concentration camps.

    -ALISON WEIR, Denying Nazi-Zionist Collusion

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2011/03/04/denying-nazi-zionist-collusion/
     

    For a detailed look at zionist collaboration with the German government, please obtain and read “51 Questions and Answers–Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis” by Lenni Brenner. In it you will find that the collaboration was much deeper than most realize.
    The zionists were hell-bent on getting massive jewish emigration to Palestine “by any means necessary” The jewish-run civil unrest of the day and the marginalization of German jews was all part of the plan. Making life uncomfortable for the “average” jew was necessary to complete the zionist plan. Hence, the “declaration of (economic) war” on Germany in 1933–yes, 1933 and with the publication of books such as “Germany Must Perish”. What better way to marginalize the German jewish population.
    As jews were “the cream of German society”, they were on top with banking, culture, and many large businesses, there was a natural reluctance to leave that all behind.
    To say the least, the zionists were not only successful in their attempts to spur emigration to Palestine, they created one of the greatest hoaxes in human history–the so-called “holocaust ™”. The “holocaust ™” was the “linchpin” that made zionist successes possible. By demonizing the whole of Germany, zionists were able to not only get emigration going, and protecting their invention, communism, getting Germany and the allies to pay for it all–to this very day. As it stands now, there will always be “holocaust ™ survivors” as the jews are now claiming–holohoax (oops, I mean holocaust ™”), “transference”the wacky concept that “holocaust ™” memories are affecting their children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. Actually, this “transference” is thousands of years old, as it is a part of jewish psyche–the “eternal victim” syndrome. If jews did not have enemies, they would have to create them…

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    ... please obtain and read “51 Questions and Answers–Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis” by Lenni Brenner.
     
    That's a well known one that I have not read, but as I noted above, the work has been damned in the usual fashion. That means I may have to obtain and study a copy soon!

    “eternal victim” syndrome.
     
    Yet they always claim to be the best of the best in everything. Talk about having your cake and eating it too! Too bad the masses of goyim are so everlastingly stupid as to believe everything but the truth.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    I wouldn't click on Agree but you do provoke the thought that it would be interesting to see a thorough research job done on the more ruthless ways that Zionists sought to promote emigration to Palestine, especially in the early 30s. There must be plenty of telling correspondence.
  49. Steve Bannon

    You called the Alt Right losers who you want to crush…well, the Alt Right is a response to over 40 years of greedy fat cockroaches such as you race-replacing Native Born White American Men…most of them Veterans….with Hindu Foreigners…and Chinese Foreigners in the engineering profession…..you fat f….k cockroach….

    Read More
  50. Trump contradicted himself when he called James Field a murderer and condemned him in the strongest terms. This is right after he said that he needed all the facts before making a statement, and that “we still don’t know all the facts”. We still don’t know what really happened with James Field. He could’ve accidentally stepped on the gas instead of the brakes when he plowed into the car in front, when the protesters immediately began smashing his car, he tried to run, wouldn’t anyone else of right mind in that situation? I think Trump jumped the gun accusing him of all those things. Innocent until proven guilty.

    Read More
  51. annamaria says:
    @Proud_Srbin
    After seeing blood lust, the extreme far left terrorists demonstrated against the statue, I dread to think what they would have done to the driver of the car.

    The Obama loyalists (including the neocon antifa) are blind and deaf to the Obama-spawned Nazi revival in Ukraine:

    http://theduran.com/ukraine-erects-a-new-fascist-statue-and-america-remains-silent/

    ‘The Ukrainian regime authorities have unveiled a statue honoring the fighters who are engaged in an aggressive war of ethnic cleansing against the people of Donbass. …. This just one of many monuments that have recently been erected in Ukraine which celebrate the fascist ideology and murderous Nazi collaborators, including the infamous Stepan Bandera whose followers massacred Russians, Soviet Ukrainians, Poles and Jews.
    … the same American politicians criticizing Trump for allegedly not being hard enough on the so-called fascist right in the US, are those who continue to support a regime in Ukraine that is the closet thing to pure, classical fascism a near-European country…”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    "Nazi collaborators" in what?

    Proof please, and don't try the supremacist Jew controlled Wikipedia.

    Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course
    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com
  52. J1234 says:

    There was an attack on two off duty British soldiers in a car who had come upon an IRA funeral in 1988. The soldiers were taken from their car and murdered by the crowd. I still remember the shock I felt when watching the incident on TV. The soldiers’ car was also traveling fast, but didn’t hit anyone.

    I’m guessing that driving fast is a tactic (ill conceived, in most cases) to keep a hostile crowd out of your path so that you can’t be surrounded, as the soldiers in Belfast were when their car finally stopped. Of course, then it appears the Charlottesville guy panicked when confronted with a no-thru-traffic scenario and plowed into the two cars in front of him.

    He’s going to be guilty of something, but this isn’t anything like the Nice or other European vehicle attacks inflicted on passive unorganized non-hostile crowds. The photos of him in the Unite the Right crowds earlier that day – and the pipes and baseball bats carried by antifa – illustrate why he had good reason to worry about being recognized by the leftist crowd.

    Read More
  53. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Randal
    All shows the importance of not taking anything the mainstream media says as any basis for pronouncements in the immediate aftermath of any incident involving political correctness issues. They will always lie as they did in this case, making out this was a deliberate attack by a racist psychopath, and that initial lie then shapes the public political response.

    The case for a full and in depth Federal investigation of the events of the day, starting with the decisions of the local government and police authorities appears overwhelming. But who could actually be trusted to carry out such an investigation without an inherent bias against badthinkers?

    such a cynic you are.

    The crimes of the Nazees were far worse, but the Nuremberg trials managed to deliver fair and impartial verdicts, didn’t they?

    Didn’t they??

    Just to show how thoroughly the Nuremberg Trials supported equal justice and American Constitutional values, even Jules Streicher was hanged for writing nasty things about Jews. That was fitting indeed and just, wasn’t it?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    The facts about Nuremberg:

    Article 21 of Charter of the International Military Tribunal:
    The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents of the committees set up in the various allied countries for the investigation of war crimes, and of records and findings of military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations.
    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp

    English translations of Russian translations of Polish copies of an alleged German original which cannot be found. That is typical of Nuremberg 'documents'. Ask Carlos Porter about that, his website is filled with such 'documents'.

    Recall that at Nuremberg is was stated that 'the court was not bound by technical rules of evidence.' .

    The official use of torture in extracting "confessions" from Germans has been confirmed repeatedly.

    - All but two of the Germans [on trial at Nuremberg], in the 139 cases that we investigated, had their testicles kicked in beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators:" 23.1.49, The Sunday Pictorial (quoted in For Those Who Cannot Speak (ref. 27), p.21.The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months..The investigators would put a black hood over the accused's head, punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses. American judge, van Roden

    - Judge van Roden's allegation of torture to gain "confessions" is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred. Congressional Record, appendix v. 95, sec.12, 3/10/49

    - U.S. Congressional Representative, Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin said:
    " The Nuremberg Trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history."
    Congressional Record, appendix, v.95, sec.14, 6/15/49

    - All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was Standard Operating Procedure with American investigators.
    by Judge E. L. van Roden, "American Atrocities in Germany", The Progressive. February 1949, p. 21f.

    - Judge van Roden's allegation of torture to gain "confessions" is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred.
    - Congressional Record, appendix. v. 95,sec.12, 3/10/49

    - "The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to [Bernard] Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: 'Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse.'"(12)
    12.R. Butler, Legions of Death, Hamlyn, (London, 1983), p.237

    - The admission of Bernard Clarke was corroborated by Mr. Ken Jones in 'The Wrexham Leader', October 17, 1986.
    Mr. Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid in Schleswig-Holstein.
    "They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activites during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Hoess in his cell to help break him down for interrogation."
    "We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance," said Mr. Jones.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:

    - There was no legal precedent for this, one official noted, besides which "any court of inquiry into these allegations would be futile".

    - In one complaint lodged at the National Archives, a 27-year-old German journalist being held at this camp said he had spent two years as a prisoner of the Gestapo. And not once, he said, did they treat him as badly as the British.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:
    - "The London Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German officers and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed through the Cage, and more than 1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes. The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of German civilians joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948.
    As the work of the Cage was wound down, the interrogation of prisoners was switched to a number of internment camps in Germany. And there is evidence that the treatment meted out in these places was, if anything, far worse. While many of the papers relating to these interrogation centres remain sealed at the Foreign Office, it is clear that one camp in the British zone became particularly notorious. At least two German prisoners starved to death there, according to a court of inquiry, while others were shot for minor offenses.
     

     
  54. @anarchyst
    For a detailed look at zionist collaboration with the German government, please obtain and read "51 Questions and Answers--Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis" by Lenni Brenner. In it you will find that the collaboration was much deeper than most realize.
    The zionists were hell-bent on getting massive jewish emigration to Palestine "by any means necessary" The jewish-run civil unrest of the day and the marginalization of German jews was all part of the plan. Making life uncomfortable for the "average" jew was necessary to complete the zionist plan. Hence, the "declaration of (economic) war" on Germany in 1933--yes, 1933 and with the publication of books such as "Germany Must Perish". What better way to marginalize the German jewish population.
    As jews were "the cream of German society", they were on top with banking, culture, and many large businesses, there was a natural reluctance to leave that all behind.
    To say the least, the zionists were not only successful in their attempts to spur emigration to Palestine, they created one of the greatest hoaxes in human history--the so-called "holocaust ™". The "holocaust ™" was the "linchpin" that made zionist successes possible. By demonizing the whole of Germany, zionists were able to not only get emigration going, and protecting their invention, communism, getting Germany and the allies to pay for it all--to this very day. As it stands now, there will always be "holocaust ™ survivors" as the jews are now claiming--holohoax (oops, I mean holocaust ™"), "transference"the wacky concept that "holocaust ™" memories are affecting their children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. Actually, this "transference" is thousands of years old, as it is a part of jewish psyche--the "eternal victim" syndrome. If jews did not have enemies, they would have to create them...

    … please obtain and read “51 Questions and Answers–Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis” by Lenni Brenner.

    That’s a well known one that I have not read, but as I noted above, the work has been damned in the usual fashion. That means I may have to obtain and study a copy soon!

    “eternal victim” syndrome.

    Yet they always claim to be the best of the best in everything. Talk about having your cake and eating it too! Too bad the masses of goyim are so everlastingly stupid as to believe everything but the truth.

    Read More
  55. @David
    Hitler had this interesting thing to say:

    This state of affairs compelled us to take the work of safeguarding our meetings into our own hands. No reliance could be placed on official protection. On the contrary; experience showed that such protection always favoured only the disturbers. The only real outcome of police intervention would be that the meeting would be dissolved, that is to say, closed. And that is precisely what our opponents granted.

    Generally speaking, this led the police to adopt a procedure which, to say the least, was a most infamous sample of official malpractice. The moment they received information of a threat that the one or other
    meeting was to be broken up, instead of arresting the would-be disturbers, they promptly advised the innocent parties that the meeting was forbidden. This step the police proclaimed as a 'precautionary measure in the interests of law and order'.
     

    I have no doubt that Hitler said that and that it was such ideas, otherwise known as speaking the truth, that lead to his demise and the fact that he’s cursed to this day by masses of ignorami who also and sadly, keep breeding.

    Read More
  56. @unit472
    Whatever the facts turn out to be concerning Mr. Fields the more important issue is the tendency of the Democrat party to be nothing more than the modern equivalent of a 'lynch mob'. How else to explain this sudden obsession with destroying Confederate monuments more than 150 years after the end of the Civil War?

    For those of a certain age the memory of the hula hoop or yo yo comes to mind. At some point in the late 1950's a toy maker came out with the hula hoop. Maybe it had something to do with Hawaii becoming a state but in any event this plastic hula hoop appeared everywhere out of nowhere. A few years later another toy company was able to revive the yo yo and soon every kid had a yo yo dangling from their finger. These 'fads' were incredible marketing successes for the toy makers and harmless fun for the children caught up in the craze but are we to take seriously a political party and news media that offers up nothing but the same sort of mindless faddishness?

    This 'group think' craze isn't new either. Rush Limbaugh has used it to great effect on a number of occcasions making audio loops of top Democrats all repeating the 'buzzword' du jour. Remember how Dick Cheney was always mentioned in conjunction with the word 'gravitas'? A word that was almost never used in casual discourse suddenly was issuing daily from the mouths of Democrats everywhere.

    This sort of top down political discourse is what is so dangerous about the modern Democrat party. It is a totalitarian movement where thinking is replaced with mindless mob behavior.

    This sort of top down political discourse is what is so dangerous about the modern Democrat party. It is a totalitarian movement where thinking is replaced with mindless mob behavior.

    Good comments except for the above which is half correct. It applies to the Republikans as well.

    Read More
  57. The central question is this: Do you see your nation as your home or your apartment? Are your people the Owners or Renters of the National Property?

    If you see it as your home, your people collectively hold the title on the property.
    If you see it as your apartment, then it’s just a lease held by individuals and can be revoked.
    And those with leases than titles can be evicted and replaced with new occupants.

    Title or Lease? That is your choice. National Ownership of the Title OR Rented Property owned by a handful of Globalist Oligarchs. Globalists hate Putin and Russia because they nationalized natural resources as the property of all Russians, not private property to be owned by globo-oligarchs who ‘rent’ and ‘lease’ them out to the Russians.

    The Elite Globalists see all of the West as their property, not yours. They see themselves as the landlords with the power to rent out national property to people-as-apartment-dwellers.
    So, white people in Europe or New Europe(America and Canada) are denied collective ownership of their nation. Th entire nation is just private property owned by globalist landlords who lease it out to ‘diversity’. Replacism is the Name of the Game.

    In a sane world, each individual owns his personal-private property, BUT the nation-as-civilization-history-and-culture is owned collectively by all patriots.
    Globalists push the Renter-Principle on ALL PEOPLES… except guess which nation? Israel where the Jews are recognized as the Eternal Title-Holders to their own nation… despite the fact that they’d been away for 2,000 yrs.

    Why do globalists deny such Principle of Patriotic Ownership of Homeland to Poles and Hungarians?

    Wake up people.

    The Plaque on STATUE OF LIBERTY turns us all into mere Renters, not Owners. It takes away our title and replaces it with a lease. It is the STATUTE OF LESEE.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    The Death Of A Nation: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-17/death-nation
    "That America may soon be gone with the wind. The violence at Charlottesville, the pulling down of a Confederate memorial by a mob in Durham, the removal of four monuments from Baltimore (which has one of America’s highest homicide rates) under the cowardly cloak of night, and calls for getting rid of many more are simultaneously the death throes of the old America built on one national concept and the birth pangs of a new, borderless, multiethnic, multilingual, multireligious, multisexual, ahistorical, fake «America» now aborning in violence and lawlessness.

    He who says A must say B. When one accepts demonization of part of our history and placing those who defend it beyond the pale of legitimate discourse, one should hardly be surprised when the arrogant fury of the victors is unleashed. That takes two forms: the nihilist street thugs of «Antifa» and «Black Lives Matter», and the authorities (both governmental and media, a/k/a the Swamp) who confer on them immunity for violent, criminal behavior. The former are the shock troops of the latter.

    They’ve been at it for months, well before Charlottesville, across the country, with nary a peep from the party that supposedly has uniform control over the federal government. Our First Amendment rights as Americans end where a black-clad masked thug chooses to put his (or her or indeterminate «gender») fist or club. To paraphrase U.S. Chief Justice Roger Taney in Dred Scott, loyalists of the old America have no rights which the partisans of the new one are bound to respect. Where’s the Justice Department probe of civil rights violations by this organized, directed brutality?"
  58. Ramzpaul gives excellent overview of where Alt Right went reckless. Hubris is always met with Nemesis. Spencer got over his head and may have stepped into a trap.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8VYmY89_KU

    On the other hand, Spencer did provoke the Beast and expose its true nature as a Machine of State Terror and Lies. It’s like a boy walking into the lair of the dragon and prodding it with a stick to make it burst forth in full fury. Boy gets burnt, but we get to the Dragon in its fully ferocity.

    There is an element of mischief in this which is sort of endearing.

    And I can’t help thinking of this scene in THE WILD BUNCH where the outlaws were ‘set up’.

    ‘They are blowing this town all to hell’. A Peckinpah Moment in American History.

    Whatever Spencer did, good or bad, it is a truly historic event in American History that engulfed even the president and the world media. It forced everyone’s hand on where they really stood. It clarified things and brought things into focus. Rubio the Cuck and Mitt Romney tweeted that it’s wonderful for Antifanissary to physically assault patriots.

    https://youtu.be/gOJJm_cSRds

    Read More
  59. I’m appalled by all those Nazis and bigots!!

    I’ve been triggered!!!

    I now support the tearing down of all Confederate statues. And those of Washington and Jefferson too. And of course of Jackson.

    But the statue that really needs to be taken down is the Statue of Liberty which should be called the Statue of Conquest, Colonization, and Genocide. After all, it shows Emma Lazarus the proto-Zionist imperialist genocider holding a Tiki Torch with the vision of reducing noble red native folk of America into Huddled Wretched Refuse on the Trail of Tears or impoverished reservations. Sure, Lazarus came AFTER the nation was settled, but she was for Manifest Destiny, which means she endorsed the whole enterprise of Old Worlders conquering and Nazifying the New World with white folks, Jews, blacks and later even Asians, Hindus, and Muslims. What shame!!

    Statue of Genocide must be removed. We should erect in its place the Statue of the Crying Indian.
    Now, where can we find an Italian-American guy to serve as model for the statue?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Suu84khNGY

    PS. As long as they are taking down the Gandhi statue in Africa because he made some Hindu-ish comments about blacks, I think we should tear down MLK statue, aka Bouncer on the Mall.
    After all, MLK endorsed Zionist Imperialism, the project of reducing Palestinians into huddled wretched refuse in the neo-Indian-Reservation-Ghetto called Gaza and dwindling West Bank. MLK took 30 pieces of silver and endorsed imperialism and genocide.

    Read More
  60. Wally says: • Website
    @jacques sheete

    What kind of crazy Jew would want a Jewish state to be defended by Hitler and Nazis?
     
    The Nazis had the support of some Zionists including the Zionist banker, George Kareski and others. Of course, as is typical, today's liars will deny all of it.


    “… Zionist leaders … made a point of displaying abysmal contempt for their Jewish brothers and sisters by actively participating in their extermination.”

    Rabbi Gedalya Liebermann – Australia, THE ROLE OF ZIONISM IN THE HOLOCAUST
    http://www.truetorahjews.org/lieberman
     

    More smoke & mirrors.

    [MORE]

    The ‘holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

    The tide is turning.

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”.
    Arthur Schopenhauer

    Read More
  61. Wally says: • Website
    @annamaria
    The Obama loyalists (including the neocon antifa) are blind and deaf to the Obama-spawned Nazi revival in Ukraine:
    http://theduran.com/ukraine-erects-a-new-fascist-statue-and-america-remains-silent/

    'The Ukrainian regime authorities have unveiled a statue honoring the fighters who are engaged in an aggressive war of ethnic cleansing against the people of Donbass. .... This just one of many monuments that have recently been erected in Ukraine which celebrate the fascist ideology and murderous Nazi collaborators, including the infamous Stepan Bandera whose followers massacred Russians, Soviet Ukrainians, Poles and Jews.
    ... the same American politicians criticizing Trump for allegedly not being hard enough on the so-called fascist right in the US, are those who continue to support a regime in Ukraine that is the closet thing to pure, classical fascism a near-European country..."

    “Nazi collaborators” in what?

    Proof please, and don’t try the supremacist Jew controlled Wikipedia.

    Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189

    [MORE]

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
  62. Wally says: • Website
    @anonymous
    such a cynic you are.

    The crimes of the Nazees were far worse, but the Nuremberg trials managed to deliver fair and impartial verdicts, didn't they?

    Didn't they??

    Just to show how thoroughly the Nuremberg Trials supported equal justice and American Constitutional values, even Jules Streicher was hanged for writing nasty things about Jews. That was fitting indeed and just, wasn't it?

    The facts about Nuremberg:

    [MORE]

    Article 21 of Charter of the International Military Tribunal:
    The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents of the committees set up in the various allied countries for the investigation of war crimes, and of records and findings of military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations.

    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp

    English translations of Russian translations of Polish copies of an alleged German original which cannot be found. That is typical of Nuremberg ‘documents’. Ask Carlos Porter about that, his website is filled with such ‘documents’.

    Recall that at Nuremberg is was stated that ‘the court was not bound by technical rules of evidence.’ .

    The official use of torture in extracting “confessions” from Germans has been confirmed repeatedly.

    - All but two of the Germans [on trial at Nuremberg], in the 139 cases that we investigated, had their testicles kicked in beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators:” 23.1.49, The Sunday Pictorial (quoted in For Those Who Cannot Speak (ref. 27), p.21.The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months..The investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head, punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses. American judge, van Roden

    - Judge van Roden’s allegation of torture to gain “confessions” is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred. Congressional Record, appendix v. 95, sec.12, 3/10/49

    - U.S. Congressional Representative, Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin said:
    ” The Nuremberg Trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history.”
    Congressional Record, appendix, v.95, sec.14, 6/15/49

    - All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was Standard Operating Procedure with American investigators.
    by Judge E. L. van Roden, “American Atrocities in Germany”, The Progressive. February 1949, p. 21f.

    - Judge van Roden’s allegation of torture to gain “confessions” is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred.
    - Congressional Record, appendix. v. 95,sec.12, 3/10/49

    - “The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to [Bernard] Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: ‘Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse.’”(12)
    12.R. Butler, Legions of Death, Hamlyn, (London, 1983), p.237

    - The admission of Bernard Clarke was corroborated by Mr. Ken Jones in ‘The Wrexham Leader’, October 17, 1986.
    Mr. Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid in Schleswig-Holstein.
    “They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activites during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks,” recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Hoess in his cell to help break him down for interrogation.”
    “We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance,” said Mr. Jones.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:

    - There was no legal precedent for this, one official noted, besides which “any court of inquiry into these allegations would be futile”.

    - In one complaint lodged at the National Archives, a 27-year-old German journalist being held at this camp said he had spent two years as a prisoner of the Gestapo. And not once, he said, did they treat him as badly as the British.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:
    - “The London Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German officers and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed through the Cage, and more than 1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes. The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of German civilians joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948.
    As the work of the Cage was wound down, the interrogation of prisoners was switched to a number of internment camps in Germany. And there is evidence that the treatment meted out in these places was, if anything, far worse. While many of the papers relating to these interrogation centres remain sealed at the Foreign Office, it is clear that one camp in the British zone became particularly notorious. At least two German prisoners starved to death there, according to a court of inquiry, while others were shot for minor offenses.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Van Roden had nothing to do with Nuremberg. That you repeat this nonsense despite being shown wrong belies the rest of your statements.
  63. Zimmerman was almost parodically sympathetic, a non-white neighbourhood watchman defending himself from violent attack by the thug he shot. So I don’t think this will go down the same way.

    Read More
  64. @jim jones
    ZH says the protestors were paid:

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-16/why-was-crowd-hire-company-recruiting-25-hour-political-activists-charlotte-last-wee

    ZH says the protestors were paid

    Yeah, well, ZH also says that there’s no such thing as nuclear weapons, and all those stories about Nagasaki and Hiroshima are hoaxes perpetrated by the media and the government.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-06/atom-bomb-anniversary-youre-being-lied-about-hiroshima-and-much-more

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    I was looking forward to finding that Zero Hedge was a Brabantian [a UR commenter] level conspiracy monger but ZH doesn't in fact deny in your link the fact of nuclear weapons having been used over Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
  65. It kills me how these Deep State Matrix tries to make this James Fields guy into some kind of Grand Villain terrorist. Most likely, the combination of Antifa thuggery and State terror filled with with panic and rage. And things got out of control.

    In contrast, Obama and globalists willfully targeted Libya for total destruction. And when the nation turned into hellhole, they shrugged their shoulders and said ‘Oops, just a mistake’.

    Same with their aid to Alqaeda in Syria and Neo-Nazis in Ukraine. Indeed, Obama and Deep State didn’t apologize for that one. Those weren’t even admitted as ‘mistakes’ but flushed down the memory hole.

    As for Bush and Cheney and other crooks behind the lies of WMD and Iraq War, how many were tried for lies and war crimes? Zero.

    If you got the power, you can get away with anything.

    It’s obvious what the Deep State Narrative is. It is, “It doesn’t matter what you do. What matters is what you ARE. So, if you’re Alt Right, it doesn’t matter if you follow the law and play by the rules. You must be destroyed and banned for what you ARE.”
    In contrast, Zionist-Globalists and their Antifanissary pitbull dogs can do as they please no matter how criminal or illegal since they are supposedly redeemed by what they ARE.

    That is the height of Nihilism. If you are A, then you can do ANYTHING even if wrong. If you are B, then you can NOT do anything even if right.

    So, if you’re smeared as ‘nazi’, nothing you do is alright even if legal and protected by Constitution. But if you’re a punch-a-nazi, anything you do is alright even if illegal or criminal.

    Now, we know what it’s like to be a Palestinian in West Bank.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCkFgmK1-dY

    Read More
  66. ia says:

    They ought to play this iconic video forever. Favela escapees running wild with clubs in middle class white town. LOL.

    Most importantly, he did not accelerate after hitting the crowd, he braked and paused. He threw the car into reverse only when his window was smashed.

    If you look closely he decelerated because he tail-ended a car. Maybe he couldn’t see it because of the crowd.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    No. You can see it here. He decelerated to avoid hitting the girl in front of him:

    https://kek.gg/i/3hGRWy.jpg

    Afterwards, he had to reverse to avoid getting lynched. There were at least half a dozen Soros "antifa"
    destroying his car and trying to get to him at any cost. They seem to be comfortable in their lynching role. Can Trump counter them in any way?
  67. @Greg Bacon

    If this was a clear cut case of self defense to escape the howling, gesticulating mob of violent antifags then James Fields had no choice but to channel his inner Muslim.
     
    Fields mother is Jewish, making Fields a Chosen One by birth, so how could he channel his inner Muslim?

    Fields mother is Jewish….

    I noticed her surname is Bloom, but have you got anything in addition to that?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hrw-500
    An article from a former very politically correct website once mentionned it.
    http://archive.is/nCvXz as well as this archived Twitter post.
    https://web.archive.org/web/20170817012008/https://twitter.com/captain_guard/status/896531351545028612

    There's also these videos about Frank Collin, a son of a Jewish Holocaust survivor who was involved in neo-nazis stuffs in Skokie, IL in the late 1970s.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZEowN0Dios
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryc_UgywyDw
    Some Youtube commenters suspect then he could had been a underwater/provocateur agents.

    Also, Paul Kersey's site SBPDL isn't available for now. Looks like lots of folks will have to archive the various Google/Bing cache copies still available.
  68. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Simon in London
    It certainly doesn't look like a Dallas shooting-style premeditated terror attack. He was probably in fear of his life. His action was probably not defensible, inasmuch as not everyone in that hate-filled crowd was trying to kill him, and the people attacking his car were unlikely to be the same ones he drove into. He probably committed a crime I would guess, but certainly the authorities should take the primary blame for setting this up when it's their job to secure the peace.

    It certainly doesn’t look like a Dallas shooting-style premeditated terror attack.

    I think the fact that the only person he killed was a white woman would tell most people that, if they were thinking.

    And the fact that he didn’t use one of the many guns at the event would tell you he didn’t have any help.

    But you know how people are.

    Read More
  69. Fields is the next Dylan Roof. He’s apparently the latest lone wolf excuse used to destroy southern culture and attack whites. Any excuse will do.

    Read More
  70. bobolink says:

    Wasn’t there a time when people used to await the findings at least of an investigation, if not the conclusion of a trial, before pronouncing someone to be absolutely guilty of a crime? In particular, murder requires an element of mens rea that can easily be misread on the basis of appearances. President Trump has very inappropriately jumped to a conclusion and made a public pronouncement even of questionable legality. It’s disturbing that he didn’t know better than to put his oar into the matter in such a hamfisted way. How can someone be guaranteed a fair trial when influential politicians are assigning guilt before the facts have even been collected?

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    I voted for Trump, but it was obvious from the debates that he's a shallow jackass. I don't think he understands much about America. How could he? He's first generation on one side, second on the other, has had two foreign wives, and is a product of NYC. He's better than Hillary, but he still doesn't really understand, or relate to, the traditional Americans who voted him into office. He's a cliche' with a comb-over.
  71. Art says:

    Trump: The Driver Of The Car Is A Disgrace To His Country, “Terrorist,” Murderer,

    You should know that there is phalanx of lawyers crawling and slithering all over each other to sue Trump for calling the murderer a murderer. The drool and saliva is ankle deep in lawyer land.

    Read More
  72. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    The facts about Nuremberg:

    Article 21 of Charter of the International Military Tribunal:
    The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents of the committees set up in the various allied countries for the investigation of war crimes, and of records and findings of military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations.
    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp

    English translations of Russian translations of Polish copies of an alleged German original which cannot be found. That is typical of Nuremberg 'documents'. Ask Carlos Porter about that, his website is filled with such 'documents'.

    Recall that at Nuremberg is was stated that 'the court was not bound by technical rules of evidence.' .

    The official use of torture in extracting "confessions" from Germans has been confirmed repeatedly.

    - All but two of the Germans [on trial at Nuremberg], in the 139 cases that we investigated, had their testicles kicked in beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators:" 23.1.49, The Sunday Pictorial (quoted in For Those Who Cannot Speak (ref. 27), p.21.The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months..The investigators would put a black hood over the accused's head, punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses. American judge, van Roden

    - Judge van Roden's allegation of torture to gain "confessions" is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred. Congressional Record, appendix v. 95, sec.12, 3/10/49

    - U.S. Congressional Representative, Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin said:
    " The Nuremberg Trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history."
    Congressional Record, appendix, v.95, sec.14, 6/15/49

    - All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was Standard Operating Procedure with American investigators.
    by Judge E. L. van Roden, "American Atrocities in Germany", The Progressive. February 1949, p. 21f.

    - Judge van Roden's allegation of torture to gain "confessions" is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred.
    - Congressional Record, appendix. v. 95,sec.12, 3/10/49

    - "The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to [Bernard] Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: 'Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse.'"(12)
    12.R. Butler, Legions of Death, Hamlyn, (London, 1983), p.237

    - The admission of Bernard Clarke was corroborated by Mr. Ken Jones in 'The Wrexham Leader', October 17, 1986.
    Mr. Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid in Schleswig-Holstein.
    "They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activites during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Hoess in his cell to help break him down for interrogation."
    "We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance," said Mr. Jones.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:

    - There was no legal precedent for this, one official noted, besides which "any court of inquiry into these allegations would be futile".

    - In one complaint lodged at the National Archives, a 27-year-old German journalist being held at this camp said he had spent two years as a prisoner of the Gestapo. And not once, he said, did they treat him as badly as the British.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:
    - "The London Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German officers and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed through the Cage, and more than 1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes. The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of German civilians joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948.
    As the work of the Cage was wound down, the interrogation of prisoners was switched to a number of internment camps in Germany. And there is evidence that the treatment meted out in these places was, if anything, far worse. While many of the papers relating to these interrogation centres remain sealed at the Foreign Office, it is clear that one camp in the British zone became particularly notorious. At least two German prisoners starved to death there, according to a court of inquiry, while others were shot for minor offenses.
     

     

    Van Roden had nothing to do with Nuremberg. That you repeat this nonsense despite being shown wrong belies the rest of your statements.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Mere weasel words.

    As usual, you, another redneck Zionist, doesn't know what he's talking about.

    By Van Roden himself:
    https://codoh.com/library/document/1129/?lang=en

    https://books.google.com/books?id=ibyPDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT353&lpg=PT353&dq=Judge+van+Roden+nuremberg&source=bl&ots=AB4tW106GZ&sig=mwKIKVp_jVWWF4S5wwk9fPFMm90&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiFp4rb4t_VAhXmwlQKHW7JCegQ6AEIXTAI#v=onepage&q=Judge%20van%20Roden%20nuremberg&f=false

    Ouch!

    and:
    http://www.ihr.org/books/harwood/dsmrd03.html

    see for details about the torture methods of the Allies:
    http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Dachau/VanRoden1948.html

    brief bio:
    EDWARD L. VAN RODEN, a Pennsylvania judge served in World War I and II, in the latter as Chief of the Military Justice Division for the European Theater where he saw service in Normandy, Belgium, the Rhineland, the Battle of the Bulge, and in the Ardennes. In 1946 he was reassigned to active duty and served on several important court martial trials in Germany. In 1948 Secretary of the Army Royall appointed him to an extraordinary commission charged with investigating the Dachau War Crimes program.

    And of course you ignore the other massive confirming information that I posted.
    Still owning you:

  73. KenH says:

    Trump, Jeff Sessions and the fake news media have convicted James Fields without knowing any of the crucial details of the incident other than an oh so sweet SJW got sent to the grave and others got banged up. Therefore, he’s unlikely to receive a fair trial and any good attorney should use that to delay trial as long as possible and push for a change of venue and even then there’s no guarantee he won’t get railroaded simply because of his un-PC political views.

    If James Fields was a Muslim, black nationalist or loony leftist he’d have an army of capable attorneys willing to take the case pro-bono just for the publicity.

    Read More
  74. @bobolink
    Wasn't there a time when people used to await the findings at least of an investigation, if not the conclusion of a trial, before pronouncing someone to be absolutely guilty of a crime? In particular, murder requires an element of mens rea that can easily be misread on the basis of appearances. President Trump has very inappropriately jumped to a conclusion and made a public pronouncement even of questionable legality. It's disturbing that he didn't know better than to put his oar into the matter in such a hamfisted way. How can someone be guaranteed a fair trial when influential politicians are assigning guilt before the facts have even been collected?

    I voted for Trump, but it was obvious from the debates that he’s a shallow jackass. I don’t think he understands much about America. How could he? He’s first generation on one side, second on the other, has had two foreign wives, and is a product of NYC. He’s better than Hillary, but he still doesn’t really understand, or relate to, the traditional Americans who voted him into office. He’s a cliche’ with a comb-over.

    Read More
  75. @40 Acres and A Kardashian

    ZH says the protestors were paid
     
    Yeah, well, ZH also says that there's no such thing as nuclear weapons, and all those stories about Nagasaki and Hiroshima are hoaxes perpetrated by the media and the government.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-06/atom-bomb-anniversary-youre-being-lied-about-hiroshima-and-much-more

    I was looking forward to finding that Zero Hedge was a Brabantian [a UR commenter] level conspiracy monger but ZH doesn’t in fact deny in your link the fact of nuclear weapons having been used over Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    Read More
    • Replies: @40 Acres and A Kardashian

    ZH doesn’t in fact deny in your link the fact of nuclear weapons having been used over Hiroshima and Nagasaki

     

    Maybe you should read it again. He says it's a story manufactured by the military and promulgated by the media:

    The entire atom bomb narrative created by the Pentagon was delivered to the public via a single writer from the New York Times who later turned out to be on the Pentagon payroll.
     
  76. @anarchyst
    For a detailed look at zionist collaboration with the German government, please obtain and read "51 Questions and Answers--Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis" by Lenni Brenner. In it you will find that the collaboration was much deeper than most realize.
    The zionists were hell-bent on getting massive jewish emigration to Palestine "by any means necessary" The jewish-run civil unrest of the day and the marginalization of German jews was all part of the plan. Making life uncomfortable for the "average" jew was necessary to complete the zionist plan. Hence, the "declaration of (economic) war" on Germany in 1933--yes, 1933 and with the publication of books such as "Germany Must Perish". What better way to marginalize the German jewish population.
    As jews were "the cream of German society", they were on top with banking, culture, and many large businesses, there was a natural reluctance to leave that all behind.
    To say the least, the zionists were not only successful in their attempts to spur emigration to Palestine, they created one of the greatest hoaxes in human history--the so-called "holocaust ™". The "holocaust ™" was the "linchpin" that made zionist successes possible. By demonizing the whole of Germany, zionists were able to not only get emigration going, and protecting their invention, communism, getting Germany and the allies to pay for it all--to this very day. As it stands now, there will always be "holocaust ™ survivors" as the jews are now claiming--holohoax (oops, I mean holocaust ™"), "transference"the wacky concept that "holocaust ™" memories are affecting their children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. Actually, this "transference" is thousands of years old, as it is a part of jewish psyche--the "eternal victim" syndrome. If jews did not have enemies, they would have to create them...

    I wouldn’t click on Agree but you do provoke the thought that it would be interesting to see a thorough research job done on the more ruthless ways that Zionists sought to promote emigration to Palestine, especially in the early 30s. There must be plenty of telling correspondence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    it would be interesting to see a thorough research job

    It is likely that there are plenty of books and articles that deal with the subject. Over the years one of the many faults of Jews has been the production of competent scholars of diverse views, many of which search for The Truth.
    , @Charles III
    Just read 'The Transfer Agreement' by Edwin Black. All the documentation and detail you could ever need. The agreement was made in August 1933, and allowed for transfer of precious foreign exchange for emigrants to Palestine, at a time when Germany was almost bankrupted by the financial and trade boycotts organized throughout the world. Unfortunately, the emigrants found they had been relieved of their holdings once they got there - they usually got a few implements and a patch of desert to work.
    By 1941, only some 80,000 people had taken up the offer; they just didn't want to go.
  77. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiuFcns0vws

    British Patriot Mark Collett says something interesting here.

    He suggest that the System clamped down on the Alt Right not so much because of its ‘extremism’ but because of its orderliness and sanity. If Unite the Right had proceeded lawfully and peacefully, it would make the Right seem sane and reasonable.

    This suggests that the Power would have been happier if indeed all the marchers had been Neo-Nazi skinhead lunatics. Then, the Media could have said, “Look at this scum”(like the Westboro Church) and easily denounced the Movement. But, the fact is, few Neo-Nazis notwithstanding, most people were clean-cut, orderly, and decent.

    And if you read the Alt Right points that would have been presented in speeches(had the event been allowed to be held), they would have sounded sane and rational to many people, especially in this age of Globo-Degeneracy and Rap ugliness.

    https://altright.com/2017/08/11/what-it-means-to-be-alt-right/

    In other words, what the System feared most was not that Alt Right come across as too extreme or crazy but that it might come across as too sane, reasonable, and sensible.

    That is why the System had to create a crisis with State Terror and Antifanissary thuggery.
    Since Alt Right and other right had assembled to be orderly and were not committed to violence and looting — like Antifa and BLM on a regular basis — , the System had to create those conditions.

    Also, since federal law was on the side of Alt Right — with help of ACLU –, the ONLY way to make the Alt Right seem ‘extreme’ was by creating mayhem and then blaming the Alt Right for all the violence.

    Spencer provoked the System psychologically, but the System revoked the event physically.

    As for the media, we know all about it. It’s the media of bogus ‘Russia hacking’ hysteria. It’s the media of lies about Ukraine, Libya, Syria, Iran, and etc.
    And all those ‘hate hoaxes’ that blamed Trump supporters when, in fact, the hoodlums were blacks and Jews.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEyMO_42zcw

    Deep State has a wide web.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    thanks Priss
    , @SolontoCroesus
    big brother is at work:

    this is attached to the alt.right Manifesto:


    Checking your browser before accessing altright.com.
    This process is automatic. Your browser will redirect to your requested content shortly.
    Please allow up to 5 seconds…

    DDoS protection by Cloudflare
    Ray ID: 39076f8869900862
     

    PS. re Collett: 1. His reference point is Britain. I don't think their context is quite the same as USA. discourse discourse discourse

    2. From my perspective, and I think from the perspective of USA context, it's a mistake to derogate "Islam," and even "Blacks," (but not BLM: they're entitled to all the opprobrium that can be sent that way).

    3. huh. "the hammer that built the Library of Congress."

    Does that mean that you'll stop attaching "Mafia" to every suggestion of Italian-ness?

    4. o god. their adoration of "white accomplishment" is cringe-worthy. "We whites gave this to them . . ."

    WE British know this because when we colonized you and overwhelmed your culture, we learned this from you.

    Get real, Collett.

    Let's hear from Jason Reza Jorgoni on Zoroaster as the basis of Greek philosophy and of the ethical dimension of Judaism & Christianity. Jorgani is part of Alt.right

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=198&v=ppjg4Q-mCZg

    In summ (having listened only half way, so far, to Collett) the insight into reasons Obama/Signer/McAuliffe cartel attempted to create a 9/11 2.1.5 in Charlottesville -- that the group was REASONABLE and persuasive -- is an extremely important insight.

    But all of the "whites esp. Brits are super exceptionals and bore white man's burden is a clunker.

    The argument needs nuance.

  78. Svigor says:

    An altrighter (“Baked Alaska”) was attacked with acid by antifa scum and may lose his sight. Crickets from Big Media, left.

    Also, Fields could very well turn out to be a Jew (mother’s maiden name is Bloom), and he doesn’t look un-Jewish, with those eyebrows.

    I noticed her surname is Bloom, but have you got anything in addition to that?

    If the commie lawsuits trying to pin blame for Fields’ actions on UTR’s organizers go forward, I’m sure we’ll find out the truth of the matter. “Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the plaintiff is arguing that antisemites are responsible for the behavior of a Jew who crashed their party.”

    This state of affairs compelled us to take the work of safeguarding our meetings into our own hands. No reliance could be placed on official protection. On the contrary; experience showed that such protection always favoured only the disturbers. The only real outcome of police intervention would be that the meeting would be dissolved, that is to say, closed. And that is precisely what our opponents granted.

    Generally speaking, this led the police to adopt a procedure which, to say the least, was a most infamous sample of official malpractice. The moment they received information of a threat that the one or other meeting was to be broken up, instead of arresting the would-be disturbers, they promptly advised the innocent parties that the meeting was forbidden. This step the police proclaimed as a ‘precautionary measure in the interests of law and order’.

    The left never changes. Not the perpetrators, and not their enablers. This is why Nazis had no sympathy for the left, once they’d seized power (that, and 12m deaths in the Holodomor before Hitler became chancellor). It’s why fascists and autodefensas and the rest come into being in the first place.

    I’m wondering what is happening to “freedom of conscience” in the West. A person’s views, whether left or right, should be presumed to be in good faith and not based on some sort of camouflaging of personal animus… until proven otherwise.

    Ha! We’re way past that old-timer.

    not Mitt Romney

    What a pile of shit Romney is.

    Read More
  79. Svigor says:

    Priss: The Man is clearly afraid of the altright. Hence all the pied piper altliters popping up to lead the altright astray. Hence all the big corporations censoring, deplatforming, harassing, and discriminating against the altright.

    It’s why conspiracy kooks get all the free speech they want, but altrighters are oppressed.

    “Yeah we censor you but give conspiracy kooks free rein because we think your rhetoric is unpersuasive and no one will listen to you.” Suuuure.

    Read More
  80. Hrw-500 says:
    @Henry's Cat

    Fields mother is Jewish....
     
    I noticed her surname is Bloom, but have you got anything in addition to that?

    An article from a former very politically correct website once mentionned it.
    http://archive.is/nCvXz as well as this archived Twitter post.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170817012008/https://twitter.com/captain_guard/status/896531351545028612

    There’s also these videos about Frank Collin, a son of a Jewish Holocaust survivor who was involved in neo-nazis stuffs in Skokie, IL in the late 1970s.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZEowN0Dios

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryc_UgywyDw

    Some Youtube commenters suspect then he could had been a underwater/provocateur agents.

    Also, Paul Kersey’s site SBPDL isn’t available for now. Looks like lots of folks will have to archive the various Google/Bing cache copies still available.

    Read More
  81. BenKenobi says:
    @Stan d Mute
    Why is it the first and only video we saw for the first 24hrs or so was from the absolute most damning angle? What separates this from Zimmerman or any of the others is the multitude of people filming that day. The media chose which film to show American mass media consumers.

    This fact alone takes me about 99% of the way toward acquitting Fields. Like his apparent role model Dick Spencer, Fields appears to be a complete pussy who will always run rather than fight (but insists on his right to stand at a street corner shouting "gas the kikes!" in Brooklyn). So a moron pussy. But if we are going to bury society's failures, shouldn't we start with those robbing, assaulting, raping, and murdering on a constant basis? When it's safe for a woman, any woman (but especially say MY wife or daughter), to walk the streets of a major American city alone at night then I might have the energy to be worried about sexually ambiguous agitating idiots who happen to kill someone in a crowd trying to kill them.

    Well f’n said.

    Read More
  82. Wally says: • Website
    @Anon
    Van Roden had nothing to do with Nuremberg. That you repeat this nonsense despite being shown wrong belies the rest of your statements.

    Mere weasel words.

    As usual, you, another redneck Zionist, doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

    By Van Roden himself:

    https://codoh.com/library/document/1129/?lang=en

    https://books.google.com/books?id=ibyPDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT353&lpg=PT353&dq=Judge+van+Roden+nuremberg&source=bl&ots=AB4tW106GZ&sig=mwKIKVp_jVWWF4S5wwk9fPFMm90&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiFp4rb4t_VAhXmwlQKHW7JCegQ6AEIXTAI#v=onepage&q=Judge%20van%20Roden%20nuremberg&f=false

    Ouch!

    and:

    http://www.ihr.org/books/harwood/dsmrd03.html

    see for details about the torture methods of the Allies:

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Dachau/VanRoden1948.html

    brief bio:
    EDWARD L. VAN RODEN, a Pennsylvania judge served in World War I and II, in the latter as Chief of the Military Justice Division for the European Theater where he saw service in Normandy, Belgium, the Rhineland, the Battle of the Bulge, and in the Ardennes. In 1946 he was reassigned to active duty and served on several important court martial trials in Germany. In 1948 Secretary of the Army Royall appointed him to an extraordinary commission charged with investigating the Dachau War Crimes program.

    And of course you ignore the other massive confirming information that I posted.
    Still owning you:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon

    Mere weasel words.
     
    I don't think you know what that term means.

    As usual, you, another redneck Zionist, doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
     
    Redneck? Really? Aren't you from rural Ohio?

    By Van Roden himself:

    https://codoh.com/library/document/1129/?lang=en

     

    This link mentions nothing about Nuremberg.

    https://books.google.com/books?id=ibyPDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT353&lpg=PT353&dq=Judge+van+Roden+nuremberg&source=bl&ots=AB4tW106GZ&sig=mwKIKVp_jVWWF4S5wwk9fPFMm90&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiFp4rb4t_VAhXmwlQKHW7JCegQ6AEIXTAI#v=onepage&q=Judge%20van%20Roden%20nuremberg&f=false

    Ouch!

     

    First of all, the book you cite here is a self-published vanity book published earlier this year. The quotations therein are pulled from whole cloth with no citations. It's worthless as a source. You might as well have wiped your ass on the page of a book.

    and:

    http://www.ihr.org/books/harwood/dsmrd03.html

     

    This link makes clear that van Roden worked on the Dachau trial -- not one of the Nuremberg trials. All three of your links prove me right.

    see for details about the torture methods of the Allies:

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Dachau/VanRoden1948.html

     

    And this link says nothing about Nuremberg.0

    brief bio:
    EDWARD L. VAN RODEN, a Pennsylvania judge served in World War I and II, in the latter as Chief of the Military Justice Division for the European Theater where he saw service in Normandy, Belgium, the Rhineland, the Battle of the Bulge, and in the Ardennes. In 1946 he was reassigned to active duty and served on several important court martial trials in Germany. In 1948 Secretary of the Army Royall appointed him to an extraordinary commission charged with investigating the Dachau War Crimes program.
     
    Again, nothing about Nuremberg.

    And of course you ignore the other massive confirming information that I posted.
     
    No point. More bullshit. But this one, I already pointed out to you, so I'm just demonstrating your rank dishonesty. And you claim "Zionists" are liars.
  83. Svigor says:

    Yes, Big Media has total air supremacy. But this is just another source of red pills for the altright VC. Big Media will not correct the Big Lie they’ve told about Charlottesville. So altrighters will turn it into red pills. Oh, look, another video showing violent, armed, acid-and-shit-flinging antifa-ISIS. Oh, look, here’s another. And another. And another. Gee dad, how can Big Media tell such lies? What else are they lying about, dad? Guess I’d better go straight to the horse’s mouth and figure out what this altright is all about for myself!

    Read More
  84. @Wizard of Oz
    I was looking forward to finding that Zero Hedge was a Brabantian [a UR commenter] level conspiracy monger but ZH doesn't in fact deny in your link the fact of nuclear weapons having been used over Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    ZH doesn’t in fact deny in your link the fact of nuclear weapons having been used over Hiroshima and Nagasaki

    Maybe you should read it again. He says it’s a story manufactured by the military and promulgated by the media:

    The entire atom bomb narrative created by the Pentagon was delivered to the public via a single writer from the New York Times who later turned out to be on the Pentagon payroll.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    You are right. When I read enough of it if was crazy enough for the UR Commenters 1st April Punch & Judy Show.

    Do you know if "Tyler Durden" is always the same ZH author?

    I have been to Hiroshima with a Japanese engineer now in his mid 70s. He didn't suggest that most of the devastation was caused by incendiary bomb caused fires. But I suppose that variation on the standard story isn't prima facie wholly improbable.

    Do these maddies deny that effective nuclear weapons were eventually created and tested? That would be truly Brabantian.
  85. BenKenobi says:
    @Greg Bacon
    Why was a Beverly Hills, CA supplying thugs, sorry, 'actors' to the Charlottesville riot and paying them $25 per hour?

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-16/why-was-crowd-hire-company-recruiting-25-hour-political-activists-charlotte-last-wee

    Who hired the supplier of thugs to the Unite Right event and why is the AntiFa flag a mirror opposite of the 1933 Communist Party of Germany?

    cuz we’re s’posed to go full Nazi and carry out Pike’s third war, duh.

    I say we knowingly take the bait and try to turn the tables in the ensuing chaos.

    Read More
  86. @40 Acres and A Kardashian

    ZH doesn’t in fact deny in your link the fact of nuclear weapons having been used over Hiroshima and Nagasaki

     

    Maybe you should read it again. He says it's a story manufactured by the military and promulgated by the media:

    The entire atom bomb narrative created by the Pentagon was delivered to the public via a single writer from the New York Times who later turned out to be on the Pentagon payroll.
     

    You are right. When I read enough of it if was crazy enough for the UR Commenters 1st April Punch & Judy Show.

    Do you know if “Tyler Durden” is always the same ZH author?

    I have been to Hiroshima with a Japanese engineer now in his mid 70s. He didn’t suggest that most of the devastation was caused by incendiary bomb caused fires. But I suppose that variation on the standard story isn’t prima facie wholly improbable.

    Do these maddies deny that effective nuclear weapons were eventually created and tested? That would be truly Brabantian.

    Read More
  87. MarkinLA says:
    @Stan d Mute
    Why is it the first and only video we saw for the first 24hrs or so was from the absolute most damning angle? What separates this from Zimmerman or any of the others is the multitude of people filming that day. The media chose which film to show American mass media consumers.

    This fact alone takes me about 99% of the way toward acquitting Fields. Like his apparent role model Dick Spencer, Fields appears to be a complete pussy who will always run rather than fight (but insists on his right to stand at a street corner shouting "gas the kikes!" in Brooklyn). So a moron pussy. But if we are going to bury society's failures, shouldn't we start with those robbing, assaulting, raping, and murdering on a constant basis? When it's safe for a woman, any woman (but especially say MY wife or daughter), to walk the streets of a major American city alone at night then I might have the energy to be worried about sexually ambiguous agitating idiots who happen to kill someone in a crowd trying to kill them.

    complete pussy who will always run rather than fight

    Sorry Charlie but fighting the government by yourself just puts you in prison even if you are innocent,. There are plenty of examples in the gun rights battle.

    When the Canadians were forced to register their guns they refused and had big rallies in the western provinces where thousands of demonstrators mocked the government and dared them to arrest them all. The gun registry collapsed.

    When one guy in Oklahoma took an AR-15 and made it fully auto and signed statement that he would never take it out of Oklahoma and walked into a federal office, he was still convicted of having an illegal machine gun on the 1932 NFA which was based on the interstate commerce clause. When it went to the 5th Circuit, they came back with some idiotic doubletalk about how the law needed to apply intrastate or it would be effectively useless intrastate. They guy spent 10 years in a federal prison.

    It would be good if the right could march and produce something like what the Canadians got. However, at this point, the police would bust open your head, and you would still be facing felony charges for domestic terrorism if you didn’t disperse when the cops told you to.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stan d Mute

    Sorry Charlie but fighting the government by yourself just puts you in prison even if you are innocent,. There are plenty of examples in the gun rights battle.
     
    Who's Charlie?

    And I think Henry Ford proved you can't fight Government and win regardless of how wealthy and powerful you may be. Ford couldn't even fight the communists and win.

    Here's my Big Question on the whole white identity issue: How do we hope to convince smart whites (2 SD and up) that they have more in common with dull whites than they do with smart Chinese or even smart Africans (assuming you can find one at 2 SD)? Dr Patel is urbane and tells clever stories at dinner parties. Earl the oil change guy tells stories about watching cars go in circles and drinking Lite Beer.

    We ignore Charles Murray at our peril.

    What was the first target of the communists? Eugenics? Why? And why did the communists work so hard to attack Ford? He paid the best wages and had the best working conditions. Was it his Edison Institutes? Surely his attacks on banking were right up their alley. Don't bother replying that it was "the joos" - that trope bores me.

    But back to Dickie Spencer and pals, they weren't up against Government - the whole issue is that government ran and hid while their diversities ran amok. Dickie is afraid to defend himself against the equally cowardly black mask crowd.
  88. annamaria says:
    @Priss Factor
    The central question is this: Do you see your nation as your home or your apartment? Are your people the Owners or Renters of the National Property?

    If you see it as your home, your people collectively hold the title on the property.
    If you see it as your apartment, then it's just a lease held by individuals and can be revoked.
    And those with leases than titles can be evicted and replaced with new occupants.

    Title or Lease? That is your choice. National Ownership of the Title OR Rented Property owned by a handful of Globalist Oligarchs. Globalists hate Putin and Russia because they nationalized natural resources as the property of all Russians, not private property to be owned by globo-oligarchs who 'rent' and 'lease' them out to the Russians.

    The Elite Globalists see all of the West as their property, not yours. They see themselves as the landlords with the power to rent out national property to people-as-apartment-dwellers.
    So, white people in Europe or New Europe(America and Canada) are denied collective ownership of their nation. Th entire nation is just private property owned by globalist landlords who lease it out to 'diversity'. Replacism is the Name of the Game.

    In a sane world, each individual owns his personal-private property, BUT the nation-as-civilization-history-and-culture is owned collectively by all patriots.
    Globalists push the Renter-Principle on ALL PEOPLES... except guess which nation? Israel where the Jews are recognized as the Eternal Title-Holders to their own nation... despite the fact that they'd been away for 2,000 yrs.

    Why do globalists deny such Principle of Patriotic Ownership of Homeland to Poles and Hungarians?

    Wake up people.

    The Plaque on STATUE OF LIBERTY turns us all into mere Renters, not Owners. It takes away our title and replaces it with a lease. It is the STATUTE OF LESEE.

    The Death Of A Nation: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-17/death-nation
    “That America may soon be gone with the wind. The violence at Charlottesville, the pulling down of a Confederate memorial by a mob in Durham, the removal of four monuments from Baltimore (which has one of America’s highest homicide rates) under the cowardly cloak of night, and calls for getting rid of many more are simultaneously the death throes of the old America built on one national concept and the birth pangs of a new, borderless, multiethnic, multilingual, multireligious, multisexual, ahistorical, fake «America» now aborning in violence and lawlessness.

    He who says A must say B. When one accepts demonization of part of our history and placing those who defend it beyond the pale of legitimate discourse, one should hardly be surprised when the arrogant fury of the victors is unleashed. That takes two forms: the nihilist street thugs of «Antifa» and «Black Lives Matter», and the authorities (both governmental and media, a/k/a the Swamp) who confer on them immunity for violent, criminal behavior. The former are the shock troops of the latter.

    They’ve been at it for months, well before Charlottesville, across the country, with nary a peep from the party that supposedly has uniform control over the federal government. Our First Amendment rights as Americans end where a black-clad masked thug chooses to put his (or her or indeterminate «gender») fist or club. To paraphrase U.S. Chief Justice Roger Taney in Dred Scott, loyalists of the old America have no rights which the partisans of the new one are bound to respect. Where’s the Justice Department probe of civil rights violations by this organized, directed brutality?”

    Read More
  89. iffen says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    I wouldn't click on Agree but you do provoke the thought that it would be interesting to see a thorough research job done on the more ruthless ways that Zionists sought to promote emigration to Palestine, especially in the early 30s. There must be plenty of telling correspondence.

    it would be interesting to see a thorough research job

    It is likely that there are plenty of books and articles that deal with the subject. Over the years one of the many faults of Jews has been the production of competent scholars of diverse views, many of which search for The Truth.

    Read More
  90. SMK says: • Website
    @KenH
    Our virtue signaling and cucking attorney general said the car attack was domestic tear-izm without knowing any of the salient facts other than the driver's right wing political orientation. The blame for the riots that resulted in the one death and dozens of injuries, some serious, should be laid at the feet of Mac Daddy McCauliffe, the Bill Deblasio Jr. Jewish mayor, black panther vice mayor and black police chief. It was their willful mishandling of event security that set off the chain of events leading up to the death by car.

    The fate of Reginald Denny is what flashed through my mind when I initially heard of this incident. Reginald slowed way down and didn't want to hurt anyone and almost got killed in the process of being a good, slow driving samaritan.

    If this was a clear cut case of self defense to escape the howling, gesticulating mob of violent antifags then James Fields had no choice but to channel his inner Muslim. Even some comprehensive self defense courses teach you to use the car as a weapon if your life is in danger and there's no other means of escape.

    Yesterday night, when discussing the Muslim terrorist attach in Barcelona, not only the anchors and guests on CNN and MSNBC but also Juan Williams, unsurprisingly, and a stupid white female I’ve never seen before on “The Five” or anywhere else, equated the atrocity that killed 13 people, as of then, and injured dozens more, many in “serious condition,” with James Field, probably acting in self-defense when attacked by “antifa” and BLM fanatics, killing a women protester. Some even called the Islamic mass-murder in Spain a “copy-cat” terrorist act, including the stupid woman on “The Five.” Yes, the Muslim terrorist in Barcelona was inspired by and “copying” the “Nazi” and “white supremacist” crime of James Fields, not the terrorist mass-murder in Nice when a Muslim fanatic stole a truck and murdered almost a hundred people, including a 4-year-old girl, and hundreds of other acts of Islamic terrorism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    Fox has become unwatchable as the women on the show take over. The only sane person left is Tucker Carlson. I watch One America News when the other shows are on.
    , @KenH
    That figures. So the Muslim who mowed down 13 people in Spain isn't totally culpable for his action because he was allegedly following the example of a "white supremacist" in murica? The rest of the (((media))), the ADL, SPLC and CAIR are smiling and will run with that fake narrative since they never miss a chance to shift the blame and focus back to whitey.

    Making fake news and false narratives is even infecting some FAUX News personalities. Just last Saturday Judge Jeannie was literally foaming at the mouth about "white supremacists". No mention of the violence started and committed by the antifags.

    Any day now the tin foil hat crowd like (((Jonathan Revusky))) will be making claims and writing articles that the Muslim terrorist in Spain was a CIA patsy or that the event didn't happen at all and was fabricated to defame Muslims.
  91. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    Mere weasel words.

    As usual, you, another redneck Zionist, doesn't know what he's talking about.

    By Van Roden himself:
    https://codoh.com/library/document/1129/?lang=en

    https://books.google.com/books?id=ibyPDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT353&lpg=PT353&dq=Judge+van+Roden+nuremberg&source=bl&ots=AB4tW106GZ&sig=mwKIKVp_jVWWF4S5wwk9fPFMm90&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiFp4rb4t_VAhXmwlQKHW7JCegQ6AEIXTAI#v=onepage&q=Judge%20van%20Roden%20nuremberg&f=false

    Ouch!

    and:
    http://www.ihr.org/books/harwood/dsmrd03.html

    see for details about the torture methods of the Allies:
    http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Dachau/VanRoden1948.html

    brief bio:
    EDWARD L. VAN RODEN, a Pennsylvania judge served in World War I and II, in the latter as Chief of the Military Justice Division for the European Theater where he saw service in Normandy, Belgium, the Rhineland, the Battle of the Bulge, and in the Ardennes. In 1946 he was reassigned to active duty and served on several important court martial trials in Germany. In 1948 Secretary of the Army Royall appointed him to an extraordinary commission charged with investigating the Dachau War Crimes program.

    And of course you ignore the other massive confirming information that I posted.
    Still owning you:

    Mere weasel words.

    I don’t think you know what that term means.

    As usual, you, another redneck Zionist, doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

    Redneck? Really? Aren’t you from rural Ohio?

    By Van Roden himself:

    https://codoh.com/library/document/1129/?lang=en

    This link mentions nothing about Nuremberg.

    https://books.google.com/books?id=ibyPDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT353&lpg=PT353&dq=Judge+van+Roden+nuremberg&source=bl&ots=AB4tW106GZ&sig=mwKIKVp_jVWWF4S5wwk9fPFMm90&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiFp4rb4t_VAhXmwlQKHW7JCegQ6AEIXTAI#v=onepage&q=Judge%20van%20Roden%20nuremberg&f=false

    Ouch!

    First of all, the book you cite here is a self-published vanity book published earlier this year. The quotations therein are pulled from whole cloth with no citations. It’s worthless as a source. You might as well have wiped your ass on the page of a book.

    and:

    http://www.ihr.org/books/harwood/dsmrd03.html

    This link makes clear that van Roden worked on the Dachau trial — not one of the Nuremberg trials. All three of your links prove me right.

    see for details about the torture methods of the Allies:

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Dachau/VanRoden1948.html

    And this link says nothing about Nuremberg.0

    brief bio:
    EDWARD L. VAN RODEN, a Pennsylvania judge served in World War I and II, in the latter as Chief of the Military Justice Division for the European Theater where he saw service in Normandy, Belgium, the Rhineland, the Battle of the Bulge, and in the Ardennes. In 1946 he was reassigned to active duty and served on several important court martial trials in Germany. In 1948 Secretary of the Army Royall appointed him to an extraordinary commission charged with investigating the Dachau War Crimes program.

    Again, nothing about Nuremberg.

    And of course you ignore the other massive confirming information that I posted.

    No point. More bullshit. But this one, I already pointed out to you, so I’m just demonstrating your rank dishonesty. And you claim “Zionists” are liars.

    Read More
  92. MarkinLA says:
    @SMK
    Yesterday night, when discussing the Muslim terrorist attach in Barcelona, not only the anchors and guests on CNN and MSNBC but also Juan Williams, unsurprisingly, and a stupid white female I've never seen before on "The Five" or anywhere else, equated the atrocity that killed 13 people, as of then, and injured dozens more, many in "serious condition," with James Field, probably acting in self-defense when attacked by "antifa" and BLM fanatics, killing a women protester. Some even called the Islamic mass-murder in Spain a "copy-cat" terrorist act, including the stupid woman on "The Five." Yes, the Muslim terrorist in Barcelona was inspired by and "copying" the "Nazi" and "white supremacist" crime of James Fields, not the terrorist mass-murder in Nice when a Muslim fanatic stole a truck and murdered almost a hundred people, including a 4-year-old girl, and hundreds of other acts of Islamic terrorism.

    Fox has become unwatchable as the women on the show take over. The only sane person left is Tucker Carlson. I watch One America News when the other shows are on.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Hey MarkinLA,

    The only sane person left is Tucker Carlson.
     
    He had a great clip on how politicians are trying to use charges of racism to shut down anything on the right - including those run/organized by non-Whites:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITPzVLGkBuY

    Whack!

    Peace.
    , @Avery
    {The only sane person left is Tucker Carlson.}

    Agree.

    { I watch One America News when the other shows are on}

    Good outlet.
    Liz Wheeler is pretty sharp and very well spoken.
    I liked that she called out Sen Sanders for his vile anti-Christian bigotry.

    But what's up with her Neocon-like obsession with Iran?
    What is the source of it?
    , @SMK
    Juan Williams is by far the worst. He's insufferable in his moral superiority, smugly deriding and denying whatever truths or half-truths the other panelists utter, almost always Gutfeld or Jesse Watters, when he isn't yelling at them in righteous anger. And Richard Fowler, who occasionally sits in for Williams, is even worse. They're so awful that they make one long for the return of beefy Bob Beckel who, ironically, was fired for "racism."

    The raven-haired zaftig sex-pot, Kimberly Gulfoyle, is good at times; not good, generally, but not all that bad either. And she's nice to look at for those of us who like curvaceous women. Like Martha McCallum, Dana Prerino is a sweet, pretty woman who never has anything original or interesting to say about anything. she's a simpleton, ignoramus, and racial left-liberal, just like her ex-boss, George W. Bush.

    Watters and Gutfeld aren't as good as Tucker Carlson but they have their moments of heresy and "political-incorractness. Tucker is the best one can expect from a mainstream, respectable conservative. So, too, with Mark Steyn. Jeanine Pirro, the feisty Lebanese, is by far the best of the Fox women, and probably the only female anchor or reporter to have voted for Trump rather than Hillary Clinton.

  93. Talha says:
    @MarkinLA
    Fox has become unwatchable as the women on the show take over. The only sane person left is Tucker Carlson. I watch One America News when the other shows are on.

    Hey MarkinLA,

    The only sane person left is Tucker Carlson.

    He had a great clip on how politicians are trying to use charges of racism to shut down anything on the right – including those run/organized by non-Whites:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITPzVLGkBuY

    Whack!

    Peace.

    Read More
  94. Avery says:
    @MarkinLA
    Fox has become unwatchable as the women on the show take over. The only sane person left is Tucker Carlson. I watch One America News when the other shows are on.

    {The only sane person left is Tucker Carlson.}

    Agree.

    { I watch One America News when the other shows are on}

    Good outlet.
    Liz Wheeler is pretty sharp and very well spoken.
    I liked that she called out Sen Sanders for his vile anti-Christian bigotry.

    But what’s up with her Neocon-like obsession with Iran?
    What is the source of it?

    Read More
  95. @Priss Factor
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiuFcns0vws

    British Patriot Mark Collett says something interesting here.

    He suggest that the System clamped down on the Alt Right not so much because of its 'extremism' but because of its orderliness and sanity. If Unite the Right had proceeded lawfully and peacefully, it would make the Right seem sane and reasonable.

    This suggests that the Power would have been happier if indeed all the marchers had been Neo-Nazi skinhead lunatics. Then, the Media could have said, "Look at this scum"(like the Westboro Church) and easily denounced the Movement. But, the fact is, few Neo-Nazis notwithstanding, most people were clean-cut, orderly, and decent.

    And if you read the Alt Right points that would have been presented in speeches(had the event been allowed to be held), they would have sounded sane and rational to many people, especially in this age of Globo-Degeneracy and Rap ugliness.

    https://altright.com/2017/08/11/what-it-means-to-be-alt-right/

    In other words, what the System feared most was not that Alt Right come across as too extreme or crazy but that it might come across as too sane, reasonable, and sensible.

    That is why the System had to create a crisis with State Terror and Antifanissary thuggery.
    Since Alt Right and other right had assembled to be orderly and were not committed to violence and looting --- like Antifa and BLM on a regular basis --- , the System had to create those conditions.

    Also, since federal law was on the side of Alt Right -- with help of ACLU --, the ONLY way to make the Alt Right seem 'extreme' was by creating mayhem and then blaming the Alt Right for all the violence.

    Spencer provoked the System psychologically, but the System revoked the event physically.

    As for the media, we know all about it. It's the media of bogus 'Russia hacking' hysteria. It's the media of lies about Ukraine, Libya, Syria, Iran, and etc.
    And all those 'hate hoaxes' that blamed Trump supporters when, in fact, the hoodlums were blacks and Jews.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEyMO_42zcw

    Deep State has a wide web.

    thanks Priss

    Read More
  96. @MarkinLA
    complete pussy who will always run rather than fight

    Sorry Charlie but fighting the government by yourself just puts you in prison even if you are innocent,. There are plenty of examples in the gun rights battle.

    When the Canadians were forced to register their guns they refused and had big rallies in the western provinces where thousands of demonstrators mocked the government and dared them to arrest them all. The gun registry collapsed.

    When one guy in Oklahoma took an AR-15 and made it fully auto and signed statement that he would never take it out of Oklahoma and walked into a federal office, he was still convicted of having an illegal machine gun on the 1932 NFA which was based on the interstate commerce clause. When it went to the 5th Circuit, they came back with some idiotic doubletalk about how the law needed to apply intrastate or it would be effectively useless intrastate. They guy spent 10 years in a federal prison.

    It would be good if the right could march and produce something like what the Canadians got. However, at this point, the police would bust open your head, and you would still be facing felony charges for domestic terrorism if you didn't disperse when the cops told you to.

    Sorry Charlie but fighting the government by yourself just puts you in prison even if you are innocent,. There are plenty of examples in the gun rights battle.

    Who’s Charlie?

    And I think Henry Ford proved you can’t fight Government and win regardless of how wealthy and powerful you may be. Ford couldn’t even fight the communists and win.

    Here’s my Big Question on the whole white identity issue: How do we hope to convince smart whites (2 SD and up) that they have more in common with dull whites than they do with smart Chinese or even smart Africans (assuming you can find one at 2 SD)? Dr Patel is urbane and tells clever stories at dinner parties. Earl the oil change guy tells stories about watching cars go in circles and drinking Lite Beer.

    We ignore Charles Murray at our peril.

    What was the first target of the communists? Eugenics? Why? And why did the communists work so hard to attack Ford? He paid the best wages and had the best working conditions. Was it his Edison Institutes? Surely his attacks on banking were right up their alley. Don’t bother replying that it was “the joos” – that trope bores me.

    But back to Dickie Spencer and pals, they weren’t up against Government – the whole issue is that government ran and hid while their diversities ran amok. Dickie is afraid to defend himself against the equally cowardly black mask crowd.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    I am not sure what you are talking about but Ford was the last automaker to unionize so that is why the "communists" fought against him. What do you want Spenser to do - operate like the British football "firms". Explain what you would have done if you were he.
    , @OilcanFloyd

    Here’s my Big Question on the whole white identity issue: How do we hope to convince smart whites (2 SD and up) that they have more in common with dull whites than they do with smart Chinese or even smart Africans (assuming you can find one at 2 SD)? Dr Patel is urbane and tells clever stories at dinner parties. Earl the oil change guy tells stories about watching cars go in circles and drinking Lite Beer.
     
    Two SD and up is what I takes to be a smart person? Anything below that is unrecognizable? The problem is that smart Asians, Africans, Indians, Latinos, Jews and others don't seem to be abandoning their less intelligent co-ethnics. We ignore the tribalism of others at our peril.
    , @notanon

    Here’s my Big Question on the whole white identity issue: How do we hope to convince smart whites (2 SD and up) that they have more in common with dull whites than they do with smart Chinese or even smart Africans (assuming you can find one at 2 SD)? Dr Patel is urbane and tells clever stories at dinner parties. Earl the oil change guy tells stories about watching cars go in circles and drinking Lite Beer.
     
    the bad guys will convince them for us by inciting anti-white violence
  97. iffen says:

    The ProPublica piece reports that throughout the morning and in different locations the police stood aside and out of the way while fighting took place between the two groups. Several incidents of militia separating combatants is reported while the police stood aside. The piece only reports assaults by UTR people and none by the antifa.

    The police admit to forcing the UTR people from the park and into the streets filled with antifa and counter-protestors. said Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe [ when asked about the police failure to intervene], “We planned for a long time for today’s incidents.”

    This from the NY Times: “He joined a human chain that stretched in front of Emancipation Park and linked his arms with others, blocking waves of white supremacists — some of them in full Nazi regalia — from entering.” This would seem to confirm the reports from UTR people that they were forced to “run gauntlets” in order to enter the park.

    Read More
  98. notanon says:

    However, video evidence shows his car was quickly set upon by a mob wielding bats, who smashed his back windows and would presumably have smashed his skul l had he not backed out quickly. That’s clearly self-defense.

    too quickly imo – which implies they were already chasing him

    and he crashed into a stationary car that was stationary because antifa were blocking the roads – and the woman was killed by him pushing the other car onto her when he crashed into it

    the media are lying

    it was McCauliffe and the Mayor

    Read More
  99. @Priss Factor
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiuFcns0vws

    British Patriot Mark Collett says something interesting here.

    He suggest that the System clamped down on the Alt Right not so much because of its 'extremism' but because of its orderliness and sanity. If Unite the Right had proceeded lawfully and peacefully, it would make the Right seem sane and reasonable.

    This suggests that the Power would have been happier if indeed all the marchers had been Neo-Nazi skinhead lunatics. Then, the Media could have said, "Look at this scum"(like the Westboro Church) and easily denounced the Movement. But, the fact is, few Neo-Nazis notwithstanding, most people were clean-cut, orderly, and decent.

    And if you read the Alt Right points that would have been presented in speeches(had the event been allowed to be held), they would have sounded sane and rational to many people, especially in this age of Globo-Degeneracy and Rap ugliness.

    https://altright.com/2017/08/11/what-it-means-to-be-alt-right/

    In other words, what the System feared most was not that Alt Right come across as too extreme or crazy but that it might come across as too sane, reasonable, and sensible.

    That is why the System had to create a crisis with State Terror and Antifanissary thuggery.
    Since Alt Right and other right had assembled to be orderly and were not committed to violence and looting --- like Antifa and BLM on a regular basis --- , the System had to create those conditions.

    Also, since federal law was on the side of Alt Right -- with help of ACLU --, the ONLY way to make the Alt Right seem 'extreme' was by creating mayhem and then blaming the Alt Right for all the violence.

    Spencer provoked the System psychologically, but the System revoked the event physically.

    As for the media, we know all about it. It's the media of bogus 'Russia hacking' hysteria. It's the media of lies about Ukraine, Libya, Syria, Iran, and etc.
    And all those 'hate hoaxes' that blamed Trump supporters when, in fact, the hoodlums were blacks and Jews.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEyMO_42zcw

    Deep State has a wide web.

    big brother is at work:

    this is attached to the alt.right Manifesto:

    Checking your browser before accessing altright.com.
    This process is automatic. Your browser will redirect to your requested content shortly.
    Please allow up to 5 seconds…

    DDoS protection by Cloudflare
    Ray ID: 39076f8869900862

    PS. re Collett: 1. His reference point is Britain. I don’t think their context is quite the same as USA. discourse discourse discourse

    2. From my perspective, and I think from the perspective of USA context, it’s a mistake to derogate “Islam,” and even “Blacks,” (but not BLM: they’re entitled to all the opprobrium that can be sent that way).

    3. huh. “the hammer that built the Library of Congress.”

    Does that mean that you’ll stop attaching “Mafia” to every suggestion of Italian-ness?

    4. o god. their adoration of “white accomplishment” is cringe-worthy. “We whites gave this to them . . .”

    WE British know this because when we colonized you and overwhelmed your culture, we learned this from you.

    Get real, Collett.

    Let’s hear from Jason Reza Jorgoni on Zoroaster as the basis of Greek philosophy and of the ethical dimension of Judaism & Christianity. Jorgani is part of Alt.right

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=198&v=ppjg4Q-mCZg

    In summ (having listened only half way, so far, to Collett) the insight into reasons Obama/Signer/McAuliffe cartel attempted to create a 9/11 2.1.5 in Charlottesville — that the group was REASONABLE and persuasive — is an extremely important insight.

    But all of the “whites esp. Brits are super exceptionals and bore white man’s burden is a clunker.

    The argument needs nuance.

    Read More
  100. Svigor says:

    And I think Henry Ford proved you can’t fight Government and win regardless of how wealthy and powerful you may be. Ford couldn’t even fight the communists and win.

    American Revolution
    Russian Revolution
    French Revolution
    Vietnam War
    IRA
    Etc. The list is long.

    Here’s my Big Question on the whole white identity issue: How do we hope to convince smart whites (2 SD and up) that they have more in common with dull whites than they do with smart Chinese or even smart Africans (assuming you can find one at 2 SD)? Dr Patel is urbane and tells clever stories at dinner parties. Earl the oil change guy tells stories about watching cars go in circles and drinking Lite Beer.

    Here’s my big question on white identity issue: how long can White opposition to White Zionism last, when American establishment fetes Zionists and Israel, White Americans love Zionists and Israel, etc? We ignore the inevitable at our peril.

    Read More
  101. MarkinLA says:
    @Stan d Mute

    Sorry Charlie but fighting the government by yourself just puts you in prison even if you are innocent,. There are plenty of examples in the gun rights battle.
     
    Who's Charlie?

    And I think Henry Ford proved you can't fight Government and win regardless of how wealthy and powerful you may be. Ford couldn't even fight the communists and win.

    Here's my Big Question on the whole white identity issue: How do we hope to convince smart whites (2 SD and up) that they have more in common with dull whites than they do with smart Chinese or even smart Africans (assuming you can find one at 2 SD)? Dr Patel is urbane and tells clever stories at dinner parties. Earl the oil change guy tells stories about watching cars go in circles and drinking Lite Beer.

    We ignore Charles Murray at our peril.

    What was the first target of the communists? Eugenics? Why? And why did the communists work so hard to attack Ford? He paid the best wages and had the best working conditions. Was it his Edison Institutes? Surely his attacks on banking were right up their alley. Don't bother replying that it was "the joos" - that trope bores me.

    But back to Dickie Spencer and pals, they weren't up against Government - the whole issue is that government ran and hid while their diversities ran amok. Dickie is afraid to defend himself against the equally cowardly black mask crowd.

    I am not sure what you are talking about but Ford was the last automaker to unionize so that is why the “communists” fought against him. What do you want Spenser to do – operate like the British football “firms”. Explain what you would have done if you were he.

    Read More
  102. @Wizard of Oz
    I wouldn't click on Agree but you do provoke the thought that it would be interesting to see a thorough research job done on the more ruthless ways that Zionists sought to promote emigration to Palestine, especially in the early 30s. There must be plenty of telling correspondence.

    Just read ‘The Transfer Agreement’ by Edwin Black. All the documentation and detail you could ever need. The agreement was made in August 1933, and allowed for transfer of precious foreign exchange for emigrants to Palestine, at a time when Germany was almost bankrupted by the financial and trade boycotts organized throughout the world. Unfortunately, the emigrants found they had been relieved of their holdings once they got there – they usually got a few implements and a patch of desert to work.
    By 1941, only some 80,000 people had taken up the offer; they just didn’t want to go.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Thanks. I suppose it was too late if they left it till 1938, let alone 1941 - at both geograhical ends of the deal.

    When I get round to reading the book should I expect to find evidence of the "ruthless/ness" of the 1930s Zionists beyond the merely hardheaded financial dealing? What I have in mjnd for example is letters in which Zionists discuss actually provoking anti-Semitism to help their cause.
  103. Skeptikal says:
    @Randal
    All shows the importance of not taking anything the mainstream media says as any basis for pronouncements in the immediate aftermath of any incident involving political correctness issues. They will always lie as they did in this case, making out this was a deliberate attack by a racist psychopath, and that initial lie then shapes the public political response.

    The case for a full and in depth Federal investigation of the events of the day, starting with the decisions of the local government and police authorities appears overwhelming. But who could actually be trusted to carry out such an investigation without an inherent bias against badthinkers?

    I have no real opinion on Fields. Don’t know enough about him/the incident.
    However.
    The linked video, which I have seen elsewhere too, shows a gang of guys with bats chasing up to the car and starting to bash it. This gang looks as though it was already formed and running after the car before the car entered the video, and before the gang entered the video, chasing the car. To me, what is striking is not that some guys chased the car but that this looks like a cohesive group already chasing the car. Thus, what the video shows could be interpreted to mean that this gang was chasing the car, the driver speeded up, ran into pedestrians, stopped, the gang caught up with the car and started/continued to bash it, the car then reversed on top of the gang members.

    Read More
  104. @Stan d Mute

    Sorry Charlie but fighting the government by yourself just puts you in prison even if you are innocent,. There are plenty of examples in the gun rights battle.
     
    Who's Charlie?

    And I think Henry Ford proved you can't fight Government and win regardless of how wealthy and powerful you may be. Ford couldn't even fight the communists and win.

    Here's my Big Question on the whole white identity issue: How do we hope to convince smart whites (2 SD and up) that they have more in common with dull whites than they do with smart Chinese or even smart Africans (assuming you can find one at 2 SD)? Dr Patel is urbane and tells clever stories at dinner parties. Earl the oil change guy tells stories about watching cars go in circles and drinking Lite Beer.

    We ignore Charles Murray at our peril.

    What was the first target of the communists? Eugenics? Why? And why did the communists work so hard to attack Ford? He paid the best wages and had the best working conditions. Was it his Edison Institutes? Surely his attacks on banking were right up their alley. Don't bother replying that it was "the joos" - that trope bores me.

    But back to Dickie Spencer and pals, they weren't up against Government - the whole issue is that government ran and hid while their diversities ran amok. Dickie is afraid to defend himself against the equally cowardly black mask crowd.

    Here’s my Big Question on the whole white identity issue: How do we hope to convince smart whites (2 SD and up) that they have more in common with dull whites than they do with smart Chinese or even smart Africans (assuming you can find one at 2 SD)? Dr Patel is urbane and tells clever stories at dinner parties. Earl the oil change guy tells stories about watching cars go in circles and drinking Lite Beer.

    Two SD and up is what I takes to be a smart person? Anything below that is unrecognizable? The problem is that smart Asians, Africans, Indians, Latinos, Jews and others don’t seem to be abandoning their less intelligent co-ethnics. We ignore the tribalism of others at our peril.

    Read More
  105. KenH says:
    @SMK
    Yesterday night, when discussing the Muslim terrorist attach in Barcelona, not only the anchors and guests on CNN and MSNBC but also Juan Williams, unsurprisingly, and a stupid white female I've never seen before on "The Five" or anywhere else, equated the atrocity that killed 13 people, as of then, and injured dozens more, many in "serious condition," with James Field, probably acting in self-defense when attacked by "antifa" and BLM fanatics, killing a women protester. Some even called the Islamic mass-murder in Spain a "copy-cat" terrorist act, including the stupid woman on "The Five." Yes, the Muslim terrorist in Barcelona was inspired by and "copying" the "Nazi" and "white supremacist" crime of James Fields, not the terrorist mass-murder in Nice when a Muslim fanatic stole a truck and murdered almost a hundred people, including a 4-year-old girl, and hundreds of other acts of Islamic terrorism.

    That figures. So the Muslim who mowed down 13 people in Spain isn’t totally culpable for his action because he was allegedly following the example of a “white supremacist” in murica? The rest of the (((media))), the ADL, SPLC and CAIR are smiling and will run with that fake narrative since they never miss a chance to shift the blame and focus back to whitey.

    Making fake news and false narratives is even infecting some FAUX News personalities. Just last Saturday Judge Jeannie was literally foaming at the mouth about “white supremacists”. No mention of the violence started and committed by the antifags.

    Any day now the tin foil hat crowd like (((Jonathan Revusky))) will be making claims and writing articles that the Muslim terrorist in Spain was a CIA patsy or that the event didn’t happen at all and was fabricated to defame Muslims.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SMK
    And in their discussion of the Muslim terrorist attack in Barcelona, none of "The Five," in explaining the motivations of the terrorists, blamed the religion of Islam as the cause of this latest outrage and atrocity. I recall the usual drivel about "radical Islamic extremism," "radical Jihadism," "jihadist extremism," etc., as if this "radicalism" and "extremism" was an "ideology" that had nothing to do with Muhammad, the quintessential and seminal radical and extremist who founded the religion of Islam, and the Koran, with it's calls for Jihad and the killing of infidels in many passages, an "ideology" distinct from and a perversion of what George W. Bush called a "religion of peace."

    Jeanine Pirro is the best of the Fox women, but even she was awful in respect to Charlottesville.
    , @SMK
    And none of "The Five" mentioned Islamic immigration, of course, not even Watters and Gulfeld. Tucker Carlson did discuss the issue of Muslim immigration when interviewing Douglas Murray and Nigel Lafage, but none of them called for a ban on Muslim immigration, much less mass expulsions/deportations, the only solution to the "problem," the only cure for the disease. No Muslims, no Muslim terrorism. It's that simple.

    And the governing-classes and ruling-elites of the U.S. are just as evil and insane as those of the UK and Western Europe. No Muslims, no Orlando, no Fort Hood, no 9/11, etc. And thus the response to 9/11 was to double the number of Muslim aliens and call Islam as "religion of peace."

  106. SMK says: • Website
    @MarkinLA
    Fox has become unwatchable as the women on the show take over. The only sane person left is Tucker Carlson. I watch One America News when the other shows are on.

    Juan Williams is by far the worst. He’s insufferable in his moral superiority, smugly deriding and denying whatever truths or half-truths the other panelists utter, almost always Gutfeld or Jesse Watters, when he isn’t yelling at them in righteous anger. And Richard Fowler, who occasionally sits in for Williams, is even worse. They’re so awful that they make one long for the return of beefy Bob Beckel who, ironically, was fired for “racism.”

    The raven-haired zaftig sex-pot, Kimberly Gulfoyle, is good at times; not good, generally, but not all that bad either. And she’s nice to look at for those of us who like curvaceous women. Like Martha McCallum, Dana Prerino is a sweet, pretty woman who never has anything original or interesting to say about anything. she’s a simpleton, ignoramus, and racial left-liberal, just like her ex-boss, George W. Bush.

    Watters and Gutfeld aren’t as good as Tucker Carlson but they have their moments of heresy and “political-incorractness. Tucker is the best one can expect from a mainstream, respectable conservative. So, too, with Mark Steyn. Jeanine Pirro, the feisty Lebanese, is by far the best of the Fox women, and probably the only female anchor or reporter to have voted for Trump rather than Hillary Clinton.

    Read More
  107. SMK says: • Website
    @KenH
    That figures. So the Muslim who mowed down 13 people in Spain isn't totally culpable for his action because he was allegedly following the example of a "white supremacist" in murica? The rest of the (((media))), the ADL, SPLC and CAIR are smiling and will run with that fake narrative since they never miss a chance to shift the blame and focus back to whitey.

    Making fake news and false narratives is even infecting some FAUX News personalities. Just last Saturday Judge Jeannie was literally foaming at the mouth about "white supremacists". No mention of the violence started and committed by the antifags.

    Any day now the tin foil hat crowd like (((Jonathan Revusky))) will be making claims and writing articles that the Muslim terrorist in Spain was a CIA patsy or that the event didn't happen at all and was fabricated to defame Muslims.

    And in their discussion of the Muslim terrorist attack in Barcelona, none of “The Five,” in explaining the motivations of the terrorists, blamed the religion of Islam as the cause of this latest outrage and atrocity. I recall the usual drivel about “radical Islamic extremism,” “radical Jihadism,” “jihadist extremism,” etc., as if this “radicalism” and “extremism” was an “ideology” that had nothing to do with Muhammad, the quintessential and seminal radical and extremist who founded the religion of Islam, and the Koran, with it’s calls for Jihad and the killing of infidels in many passages, an “ideology” distinct from and a perversion of what George W. Bush called a “religion of peace.”

    Jeanine Pirro is the best of the Fox women, but even she was awful in respect to Charlottesville.

    Read More
  108. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @ia
    They ought to play this iconic video forever. Favela escapees running wild with clubs in middle class white town. LOL.

    Most importantly, he did not accelerate after hitting the crowd, he braked and paused. He threw the car into reverse only when his window was smashed.
     
    If you look closely he decelerated because he tail-ended a car. Maybe he couldn't see it because of the crowd.

    No. You can see it here. He decelerated to avoid hitting the girl in front of him:

    Afterwards, he had to reverse to avoid getting lynched. There were at least half a dozen Soros “antifa”
    destroying his car and trying to get to him at any cost. They seem to be comfortable in their lynching role. Can Trump counter them in any way?

    Read More
    • Replies: @ia
    You can see the bat hit the car at 16 seconds and then the car accelerates. No brake lights. Your brake lights are photoshopped. Turn off the sound and you can see better. Seriously.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-Plzx73K68

    I don't know about Trump. He's got his hands full. But the driver could file a lawsuit against Charlottesville and McAuliffe for allowing a mob to terrorize and beat law abiding citizens during a "state of emergency" I would think.
  109. The video appears to support the argument presented in this paper, if in fact what we are seeing was filmed in Human time. The car appears to actually slow down prior to hitting any of the protesters and then speeds up backwards after protesters not only attacked the car but attempted to board it.

    The extensive damage to the front of the car does not appear to have been caused by hitting people.

    The question remains though, why would Fields have driven down a street that appeared to be blocked by protesters that any driver could have seen?

    Was he already being chased by another large group and turned into this street out of sheer desperation?

    In 1969/1971 I was at Ohio State University and in some of the worst riots in the country up to that time. I was involved with a civilian Medical Unit to help both student and police\soldier alike. However, it was common knowledge that our riots had become so violent because of extreme Left winged groups that had sent provocateurs into student’s who had gathered to protest what originally was only higher tuition but somehow got turned into a protest about the Vietnam War…

    Read More
  110. SMK says: • Website
    @KenH
    That figures. So the Muslim who mowed down 13 people in Spain isn't totally culpable for his action because he was allegedly following the example of a "white supremacist" in murica? The rest of the (((media))), the ADL, SPLC and CAIR are smiling and will run with that fake narrative since they never miss a chance to shift the blame and focus back to whitey.

    Making fake news and false narratives is even infecting some FAUX News personalities. Just last Saturday Judge Jeannie was literally foaming at the mouth about "white supremacists". No mention of the violence started and committed by the antifags.

    Any day now the tin foil hat crowd like (((Jonathan Revusky))) will be making claims and writing articles that the Muslim terrorist in Spain was a CIA patsy or that the event didn't happen at all and was fabricated to defame Muslims.

    And none of “The Five” mentioned Islamic immigration, of course, not even Watters and Gulfeld. Tucker Carlson did discuss the issue of Muslim immigration when interviewing Douglas Murray and Nigel Lafage, but none of them called for a ban on Muslim immigration, much less mass expulsions/deportations, the only solution to the “problem,” the only cure for the disease. No Muslims, no Muslim terrorism. It’s that simple.

    And the governing-classes and ruling-elites of the U.S. are just as evil and insane as those of the UK and Western Europe. No Muslims, no Orlando, no Fort Hood, no 9/11, etc. And thus the response to 9/11 was to double the number of Muslim aliens and call Islam as “religion of peace.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH

    but none of them called for a ban on Muslim immigration, much less mass expulsions/deportations, the only solution to the “problem,” the only cure for the disease.
     
    While FOX is great at recognizing and discussing most problems, they rarely offer solutions since that would be deemed 'racist and white supremacist". So they endlessly bleat and bloviate about the vexing problems of the day then before you know it the segment ends. If any solutions are offered they usually amount to cucky half measures.

    Even Tucker Carlson, who is a first rate cross examiner and skewerer of loony leftists, suddenly gets a quizzical look on his face when it comes time to proposing real solutions.

    FOX is better than the other networks and like others have said, Tucker is the main attraction, but their coverage is still designed to keep us on the reservation and not think too seriously about threats to white racial survial.

  111. ia says:
    @Anonymous
    No. You can see it here. He decelerated to avoid hitting the girl in front of him:

    https://kek.gg/i/3hGRWy.jpg

    Afterwards, he had to reverse to avoid getting lynched. There were at least half a dozen Soros "antifa"
    destroying his car and trying to get to him at any cost. They seem to be comfortable in their lynching role. Can Trump counter them in any way?

    You can see the bat hit the car at 16 seconds and then the car accelerates. No brake lights. Your brake lights are photoshopped. Turn off the sound and you can see better. Seriously.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-Plzx73K68

    I don’t know about Trump. He’s got his hands full. But the driver could file a lawsuit against Charlottesville and McAuliffe for allowing a mob to terrorize and beat law abiding citizens during a “state of emergency” I would think.

    Read More
  112. anarchyst says:

    The Charlottesville situation was precipitated by the left-wing agitators that were “bought and paid for” by those on the left. A jewish-owned company, “Crowds On Demand” was contracted by the leftists to both cause trouble as leftists, AND to regale some of their paid protestors with Nazi and KKK regalia in order to demonize the “alt-right” demonstrators. Notice that the Klan robes and Nazi flags were new and still had creases in them from being recently unpackaged.
    To add insult to injury, the head of the “alt-right” demonstration was himself an 0′bama operative. THIS, in itself, PROVES that this whole event was a set-up by the left.
    This whole Charlottesville operation was a set-up from the word “go”. Its goal was to demonize EVERY WHITE person in the country, President Trump, included. Of course, the so-called “mainstream media” could not let “a crisis go to waste”, and almost to a man, blamed the violence on whites–FOX news included.
    This disturbance needs to be carefully evaluated the the blame put on those who were the perpetrators of these violent acts.
    As to the driver of the car that ran over that poor woman, he was scared for his life. Watch the videos of the black protester hit the back of his car with a sledgehammer. The driver only accelerated after being attacked. Initial police reports have said as much. Of course, the driver will probably be charged, and offered up as a “sacrificial lamb” to satisfy the left.

    Read More
  113. notanon says:
    @Stan d Mute

    Sorry Charlie but fighting the government by yourself just puts you in prison even if you are innocent,. There are plenty of examples in the gun rights battle.
     
    Who's Charlie?

    And I think Henry Ford proved you can't fight Government and win regardless of how wealthy and powerful you may be. Ford couldn't even fight the communists and win.

    Here's my Big Question on the whole white identity issue: How do we hope to convince smart whites (2 SD and up) that they have more in common with dull whites than they do with smart Chinese or even smart Africans (assuming you can find one at 2 SD)? Dr Patel is urbane and tells clever stories at dinner parties. Earl the oil change guy tells stories about watching cars go in circles and drinking Lite Beer.

    We ignore Charles Murray at our peril.

    What was the first target of the communists? Eugenics? Why? And why did the communists work so hard to attack Ford? He paid the best wages and had the best working conditions. Was it his Edison Institutes? Surely his attacks on banking were right up their alley. Don't bother replying that it was "the joos" - that trope bores me.

    But back to Dickie Spencer and pals, they weren't up against Government - the whole issue is that government ran and hid while their diversities ran amok. Dickie is afraid to defend himself against the equally cowardly black mask crowd.

    Here’s my Big Question on the whole white identity issue: How do we hope to convince smart whites (2 SD and up) that they have more in common with dull whites than they do with smart Chinese or even smart Africans (assuming you can find one at 2 SD)? Dr Patel is urbane and tells clever stories at dinner parties. Earl the oil change guy tells stories about watching cars go in circles and drinking Lite Beer.

    the bad guys will convince them for us by inciting anti-white violence

    Read More
  114. @Charles III
    Just read 'The Transfer Agreement' by Edwin Black. All the documentation and detail you could ever need. The agreement was made in August 1933, and allowed for transfer of precious foreign exchange for emigrants to Palestine, at a time when Germany was almost bankrupted by the financial and trade boycotts organized throughout the world. Unfortunately, the emigrants found they had been relieved of their holdings once they got there - they usually got a few implements and a patch of desert to work.
    By 1941, only some 80,000 people had taken up the offer; they just didn't want to go.

    Thanks. I suppose it was too late if they left it till 1938, let alone 1941 – at both geograhical ends of the deal.

    When I get round to reading the book should I expect to find evidence of the “ruthless/ness” of the 1930s Zionists beyond the merely hardheaded financial dealing? What I have in mjnd for example is letters in which Zionists discuss actually provoking anti-Semitism to help their cause.

    Read More
  115. Kevin C. says:
    @Randal
    All shows the importance of not taking anything the mainstream media says as any basis for pronouncements in the immediate aftermath of any incident involving political correctness issues. They will always lie as they did in this case, making out this was a deliberate attack by a racist psychopath, and that initial lie then shapes the public political response.

    The case for a full and in depth Federal investigation of the events of the day, starting with the decisions of the local government and police authorities appears overwhelming. But who could actually be trusted to carry out such an investigation without an inherent bias against badthinkers?

    But who could actually be trusted to carry out such an investigation without an inherent bias against badthinkers?

    Nobody. Which is why no such investigation will happen.

    Read More
  116. David says:
    @David
    Hitler had this interesting thing to say:

    This state of affairs compelled us to take the work of safeguarding our meetings into our own hands. No reliance could be placed on official protection. On the contrary; experience showed that such protection always favoured only the disturbers. The only real outcome of police intervention would be that the meeting would be dissolved, that is to say, closed. And that is precisely what our opponents granted.

    Generally speaking, this led the police to adopt a procedure which, to say the least, was a most infamous sample of official malpractice. The moment they received information of a threat that the one or other
    meeting was to be broken up, instead of arresting the would-be disturbers, they promptly advised the innocent parties that the meeting was forbidden. This step the police proclaimed as a 'precautionary measure in the interests of law and order'.
     

    Von Mises in Liberalism, 1927, has this discussion of the origins of Fascism. It’s rather long so I didn’t add it sooner. It supports Hitler’s comment. I’m not a fan of Hitler, I’m just trying to guess where the current discord it taking us. I highlighted the most significant passages, especially his very wrong prediction at the end.

    [MORE]

    Only when the Marxist Social Democrats had gained the upper hand and taken power in the belief that the age of liberalism and capitalism had passed forever did the last concessions disappear that it had still been thought necessary to make to the liberal ideology. The parties of the Third International consider any means as permissible if it seems to give promise of helping them in their struggle to achieve their ends. Whoever does not unconditionally acknowledge all their teachings as the only correct ones and stand by them through thick and thin has, in their opinion, incurred the penalty of death; and they do not hesitate to exterminate him and his whole family, infants included, whenever and wherever it is physically possible.

    The frank espousal of a policy of annihilating opponents and the murders committed in the pursuance of it have given rise to an opposition movement. All at once the scales fell from the eyes of the non-Communist enemies of liberalism. Until then they had believed that even in a struggle against a hateful opponent one still had to respect certain liberal principles. They had had, even though reluctantly, to exclude murder and assassination from the list of measures to be resorted to in political struggles. They had had to resign themselves to many limitations in persecuting the opposition press and in suppressing the spoken word. Now, all at once, they saw that opponents had risen up who gave no heed to such considerations and for whom any means was good enough to defeat an adversary. The militaristic and nationalistic enemies of the Third International felt themselves cheated by liberalism. Liberalism, they thought, stayed their hand when they desired to strike a blow against the revolutionary parties while it was still possible to do so. If liberalism had not hindered them, they would, so they believe, have bloodily nipped the revolutionary movements in the bud. Revolutionary ideas had been able to take root and flourish only because of the tolerance they had been accorded by their opponents, whose will power had been enfeebled by a regard for liberal principles that, as events subsequently proved, was overscrupulous. If the idea had occurred to them years ago that it is permissible to crush ruthlessly every revolutionary movement, the victories that the Third International has won since 1917 would never have been possible. For the militarists and nationalists believe that when it comes to shooting and fighting, they themselves are the most accurate marksmen and the most adroit fighters.

    The fundamental idea of these movements—which, from the name of the most grandiose and tightly disciplined among them, the Italian, may, in general, be designated as Fascist—consists in the proposal to make use of the same unscrupulous methods in the struggle against the Third International as the latter employs against its opponents. The Third International seeks to exterminate its adversaries and their ideas in the same way that the hygienist strives to exterminate a pestilential bacillus; it considers itself in no way bound by the terms of any compact that it may conclude with opponents, and it deems any crime, any lie, and any calumny permissible in carrying on its struggle. The Fascists, at least in principle, profess the same intentions. That they have not yet succeeded as fully as the Russian Bolsheviks in freeing themselves from a certain regard for liberal notions and ideas and traditional ethical precepts is to be attributed solely to the fact that the Fascists carry on their work among nations in which the intellectual and moral heritage of some thousands of years of civilization cannot be destroyed at one blow, and not among the barbarian peoples on both sides of the Urals, whose relationship to civilization has never been any other than that of marauding denizens of forest and desert accustomed to engage, from time to time, in predatory raids on civilized lands in the hunt for booty. Because of this difference, Fascism will never succeed as completely as Russian Bolshevism in freeing itself from the power of liberal ideas. Only under the fresh impression of the murders and atrocities perpetrated by the supporters of the Soviets were Germans and Italians able to block out the remembrance of the traditional restraints of justice and morality and find the impulse to bloody counteraction. The deeds of the Fascists and of other parties corresponding to them were emotional reflex actions evoked by indignation at the deeds of the Bolsheviks and Communists. As soon as the first flush of anger had passed, their policy took a more moderate course and will probably become even more so with the passage of time.

    Read More
  117. KenH says:
    @SMK
    And none of "The Five" mentioned Islamic immigration, of course, not even Watters and Gulfeld. Tucker Carlson did discuss the issue of Muslim immigration when interviewing Douglas Murray and Nigel Lafage, but none of them called for a ban on Muslim immigration, much less mass expulsions/deportations, the only solution to the "problem," the only cure for the disease. No Muslims, no Muslim terrorism. It's that simple.

    And the governing-classes and ruling-elites of the U.S. are just as evil and insane as those of the UK and Western Europe. No Muslims, no Orlando, no Fort Hood, no 9/11, etc. And thus the response to 9/11 was to double the number of Muslim aliens and call Islam as "religion of peace."

    but none of them called for a ban on Muslim immigration, much less mass expulsions/deportations, the only solution to the “problem,” the only cure for the disease.

    While FOX is great at recognizing and discussing most problems, they rarely offer solutions since that would be deemed ‘racist and white supremacist”. So they endlessly bleat and bloviate about the vexing problems of the day then before you know it the segment ends. If any solutions are offered they usually amount to cucky half measures.

    Even Tucker Carlson, who is a first rate cross examiner and skewerer of loony leftists, suddenly gets a quizzical look on his face when it comes time to proposing real solutions.

    FOX is better than the other networks and like others have said, Tucker is the main attraction, but their coverage is still designed to keep us on the reservation and not think too seriously about threats to white racial survial.

    Read More
  118. Gene Su says:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/charlottesville-care-worker-neo-nazis-corey-long-flame-thrower-peaceful-protest-virginia-ku-klux-a7894161.html

    I finally found some information on the photo of the “brotha” with the make-shift flamethrower. He stated that he was acting in self-defense and that someone had fired a gun at his foot at first.

    That photo looked really fishy to begin with. Why would a man preparing to attack a group with a flamethrower not have his pants buckled up? I know that’s that standard fashion for “brothas in da hood” but they do prep themselves before attacking someone. Why would he attack a large group of whites and not the elderly white man at his side? It also looks like the mob of white Confederate flag wavers were lunging at him and looking to start trouble.

    P.S. Everyone says that blacks are dumb but it takes brains to improvise a make shift flame-thrower. I’m impressed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    P.S. Everyone says that blacks are dumb but it takes brains to improvise a make shift flame-thrower. I’m impressed.

    You mean like every 6th grader does? A can of hair spray or spray paint and a lighter or long wooden match is all you need.
    , @notanon
    there's video of the incident which shows the media version is total lies - as always

    (also if i was a cop in whatever town the black kid is from i'd look into any unsolved arsons)
  119. MarkinLA says:
    @Gene Su
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/charlottesville-care-worker-neo-nazis-corey-long-flame-thrower-peaceful-protest-virginia-ku-klux-a7894161.html

    I finally found some information on the photo of the "brotha" with the make-shift flamethrower. He stated that he was acting in self-defense and that someone had fired a gun at his foot at first.

    That photo looked really fishy to begin with. Why would a man preparing to attack a group with a flamethrower not have his pants buckled up? I know that's that standard fashion for "brothas in da hood" but they do prep themselves before attacking someone. Why would he attack a large group of whites and not the elderly white man at his side? It also looks like the mob of white Confederate flag wavers were lunging at him and looking to start trouble.

    P.S. Everyone says that blacks are dumb but it takes brains to improvise a make shift flame-thrower. I'm impressed.

    P.S. Everyone says that blacks are dumb but it takes brains to improvise a make shift flame-thrower. I’m impressed.

    You mean like every 6th grader does? A can of hair spray or spray paint and a lighter or long wooden match is all you need.

    Read More
  120. Anon7 says:

    The best way to see whether or not your thinking is biased is to do some switches – try telling the James Fields story this way to your liberal friends:

    What if a young black woman, who was in Charlottesville to stand up against the KKK, was driving her little Prius when suddenly she found herself alone in an area full of white supremacists in body armor, armed with clubs. Then one of them actually hits her car! She panics and rear ends another car, realizing that the entire area is full of armed Nazis and KKK members. A half-dozen of them jump to her car, beating her windows mercilessly with clubs and shouting death threats. Terrified and in fear for her life, she shifts to reverse, and hits the gas, and escapes.

    How would America’s mainstream media talk about that story? Would she even be arrested, let alone prosecuted?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    armed Nazis and KKK members. A half-dozen of them jump to her car, beating her windows mercilessly with clubs and shouting death threats.
     
    except that the whole scenario is preposterous

    the only 'white supremacist' that has ever lived that ever threatened to harm a innocent black woman with a weapon was that guy who went into a church and shot some black church ladies to prove his white power mettle.

    and that whole story reeks of a fraud from beginning to end

    I know guys who're sympathetic to white nationalist ideas like ending Affirmative Action and controlling the border, etc..., but I've never in my life so much as seen a hint of any such person being willing to threaten a young woman with violence simply for being black.

    such people don't exist, except on the left/orc fissure of the human species

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jSdkQtG3mk

    if there's any video or other evidence of a white 'supremacist' attacking an harmless woman or girl (of any color or description) in such a way, then I'll have to reassess my entire world view.

    nevertheless, if James Fields were black, they'd be calling him a victim
  121. Rurik says:
    @Anon7
    The best way to see whether or not your thinking is biased is to do some switches - try telling the James Fields story this way to your liberal friends:

    What if a young black woman, who was in Charlottesville to stand up against the KKK, was driving her little Prius when suddenly she found herself alone in an area full of white supremacists in body armor, armed with clubs. Then one of them actually hits her car! She panics and rear ends another car, realizing that the entire area is full of armed Nazis and KKK members. A half-dozen of them jump to her car, beating her windows mercilessly with clubs and shouting death threats. Terrified and in fear for her life, she shifts to reverse, and hits the gas, and escapes.

    How would America's mainstream media talk about that story? Would she even be arrested, let alone prosecuted?

    armed Nazis and KKK members. A half-dozen of them jump to her car, beating her windows mercilessly with clubs and shouting death threats.

    except that the whole scenario is preposterous

    the only ‘white supremacist’ that has ever lived that ever threatened to harm a innocent black woman with a weapon was that guy who went into a church and shot some black church ladies to prove his white power mettle.

    and that whole story reeks of a fraud from beginning to end

    I know guys who’re sympathetic to white nationalist ideas like ending Affirmative Action and controlling the border, etc…, but I’ve never in my life so much as seen a hint of any such person being willing to threaten a young woman with violence simply for being black.

    such people don’t exist, except on the left/orc fissure of the human species

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jSdkQtG3mk

    if there’s any video or other evidence of a white ‘supremacist’ attacking an harmless woman or girl (of any color or description) in such a way, then I’ll have to reassess my entire world view.

    nevertheless, if James Fields were black, they’d be calling him a victim

    Read More
  122. notanon says:
    @Gene Su
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/charlottesville-care-worker-neo-nazis-corey-long-flame-thrower-peaceful-protest-virginia-ku-klux-a7894161.html

    I finally found some information on the photo of the "brotha" with the make-shift flamethrower. He stated that he was acting in self-defense and that someone had fired a gun at his foot at first.

    That photo looked really fishy to begin with. Why would a man preparing to attack a group with a flamethrower not have his pants buckled up? I know that's that standard fashion for "brothas in da hood" but they do prep themselves before attacking someone. Why would he attack a large group of whites and not the elderly white man at his side? It also looks like the mob of white Confederate flag wavers were lunging at him and looking to start trouble.

    P.S. Everyone says that blacks are dumb but it takes brains to improvise a make shift flame-thrower. I'm impressed.

    there’s video of the incident which shows the media version is total lies – as always

    (also if i was a cop in whatever town the black kid is from i’d look into any unsolved arsons)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gene Su
    If there is a video, show me a link to it. I sure couldn't find it.
  123. Gene Su says:
    @notanon
    there's video of the incident which shows the media version is total lies - as always

    (also if i was a cop in whatever town the black kid is from i'd look into any unsolved arsons)

    If there is a video, show me a link to it. I sure couldn’t find it.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
A simple remedy for income stagnation
Confederate Flag Day, State Capitol, Raleigh, N.C. -- March 3, 2007
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored