The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Andrew Joyce Archive
“Modify the Standards of the In-group”
On Jews and Mass Communications
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Propaganda

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“To be successful, mass propaganda on the behalf of out-groups would have to modify the standards of the in-group.
Samuel H. Flowerman, Mass Propaganda in the War Against Bigotry, 1947.[1]Flowerman, S. H., “Mass propaganda in the war against bigotry,” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42(4), (1947) 429-439.

“The whole story is transparently barmy.” This is what Guardian journalist Jason Wilson had to say in a 2015 article discussing “conspiracy theories” about Cultural Marxism. Barmy, for the uninitiated, is a British informal adjective with the meanings “mad; crazy; extremely foolish.” . Wilson continues by attempting to explain “the whole story”:

The vogue for the ideas of theorists like Herbert Marcuse and Theodor Adorno in the 1960s counterculture culminated with their acolytes’ occupation of the commanding heights of the most important cultural institutions, from universities to Hollywood studios. There, the conspiracy says, they promoted and even enforced ideas which were intended to destroy traditional Christian values and overthrow free enterprise: feminism, multiculturalism, gay rights and atheism. And this, apparently, is where political correctness came from. I promise you: this is what they really think … The theory of cultural Marxism is also blatantly antisemitic, drawing on the idea of Jews as a fifth column bringing down western civilisation from within, a racist trope that has a longer history than Marxism.

Re-reading this article recently, I wondered what Mr Wilson would say if I told him I possessed a document wherein an influential Jew linked to Marcuse and Adorno unambiguously sets out a scheme for the capture of the media, the mass brainwashing of White populations with multicultural propaganda, the manipulation of in-group culture to make it hostile to its own sense of ethnocentrism, the spreading of a culture of political correctness, and, ultimately, the co-option of the West by small ethnic clique pursuing its own interests under the guise of “promoting tolerance.” I wonder what he’d say if I told him the same Jew operated a network of hundreds, if not thousands, of other Jewish intellectuals engaged in the same single task — unlocking a psychological “backdoor” to White culture in order to completely reorient it. I think I’m correct in assuming that Mr Wilson would call me “barmy,” and accuse me of regurgitating the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. I suspect he would believe I’m a fantasist and an anti-Jewish conspiracy theorist. I know he’d dismiss even the possibility that such a document might actually exist. And yet it does exist.

The Intellectual Context

It’s quite possible that none of you have heard the name Samuel H. Flowerman, but I can say with certainty that you all, in a sense, know him nonetheless. If you’re even remotely familiar with the Frankfurt School, then you’re familiar with one aspect of his work. And, as we will soon discuss, if you find yourself living in a culture brainwashed into self-hatred then you’re familiar with another, though related, aspect of his work. Flowerman, it must be conceded, has been largely forgotten by history. He lurks in larger shadows left by “the exiles.” But Flowerman was in some respects as crucial a member of the Frankfurt School circle as any other. Of course, he wasn’t German-born. Nor was he a member of the Frankfurt School for Social Research. Instead, he was born in Manhattan in 1912, the grandson of a jeweler who arrived by ship from Warsaw’s Jewish district in 1885. And yet he would later achieve enough influence within his own group, as both activist and psychologist, to act as Research Director for the American Jewish Committee, and, most famously of all, to direct and co-edit the Studies in Prejudice series with Max Horkheimer.

For most who have in fact heard of him, this is perhaps the greatest extent of their knowledge of Flowerman. But for an accident, it would certainly represent the limits of mine. Very recently, however, I was conducting some research on Jewish activism in the cultural background preceding Brown v. Board of Education, and found myself, as I have so many times before, tumbling down the proverbial rabbit hole. After initially focusing on the figures of Jonathan Kozol and Horace Kallen (whose influence extends well beyond the popularisation of what he coined “cultural pluralism”), I came across a 2004 article in the Journal of American History by Howard University’s Daryl Scott titled “Postwar Pluralism, Brown v. Board of Education, and the Origins of Multicultural Education.”[2]D. M. Scott, “Postwar Pluralism, Brown v. Board of Education, and the Origins of Multicultural Education,” Journal of American History, Vol 91, No 1 (2004), 69–82. Scott mentioned Flowerman because of the latter’s desire (pre-Brown) to inject theories derived from Studies in Prejudice into the education system, believing that moulding children was one of the best methods to achieve long-term and sustained socio-cultural change [see here for evidence the policy is continued to this day by the ADL].

Flowerman, a fan of post-Freudian psychoanalysis, possessed a background in both the study of education and of mass communication, and this heavily informed his thinking and activism.[3]For an example of Flowerman’s thoughts on Freud and psychoanalysis see S. H. Flowerman, “Psychoanalytic Theory and Science,” American Journal of Psychotherapy, Vol. 8, No. 3, 415-441. In particular, he was doubtful that mass propaganda could, by itself, directly affect significant change among the White masses and make them abandon their “prejudice and latent authoritarianism” [i.e. acknowledging their own ethnic interests]. He was fascinated instead by the way peer group pressure exerted influence on the individual school children he had studied, along with the potential influence of teachers as shapers of minds as well as mere educators. For example, in a 1950 article for New York Times Magazine titled “Portrait of the Authoritarian Man,” Flowerman argued that, in order to produce “personalities less susceptible to authoritarian ideas, we must learn how to select better teachers and to train them better; we must see them as engineers of human relations instead of instructors of arithmetic and spelling.”[4]S. H. Flowerman, “Portrait of the Authoritarian Man,” New York Times Magazine, April 23 1950, 31.

The combined result of his research and thinking in these areas was his argument that it should be desirable for people like him to obtain control over the means of mass communication. Not only, argued Flowerman, should this control be used for blanket “pro-tolerance” propaganda, but it should also actively reshape in-group standards — thus reforming peer group pressures to become antagonistic to in-group ethnocentrism. His (then) highly ambitious goal was a culture that policed itself: a politically correct culture in which Whites, via peer pressure, conformed to new values — values much more user-friendly to Jews. His views and goals were later summarized by Herbert Greenberg, a colleague and co-ethnic in the same field, in 1957:

Flowerman de-emphasized the value and effectiveness of propaganda as a technique for reducing prejudice. He also agrees with the conception that techniques based on group structure and inter-personal relationships are the most effective.[5]Herbert Greenberg, “The Effects of Single-Session Education Techniques on Prejudice Attitudes,” The Journal of Educational Sociology, Vol. 31, No. 2 (1957), 82-86, 82.

Flowerman and Greenberg were just two members of what was effectively a series of interlinked battalions of Jewish psychologists and sociologists operating with a kind of religious fervour in the fields of “prejudice studies,” opinion-shaping, and mass communications between the 1930s and 1950s, all with the goal of “unlocking” the White mind and opening it to “tolerance.” In a remarkable invasion (and creation) of disciplines similar to the Jewish flood into the medical and race sciences in the 1920s and 1930s, Jews also flooded, and then dominated, the fields of opinion research and mass communications — areas of research that overlapped so often under Jewish scholars like Flowerman that they were practically indistinguishable.

Even a quick review of lists of Past Presidents reveals that Jews were vastly over-represented in, if not dominated, the membership and presidencies of both the American Association of Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) and the World Association of Public Opinion Research (WAPOR). And of the four academics considered the “founding fathers” of mass communication research in America, two (Vienna-born Paul Lazarsfeld and Kurt Lewin) were Jews. Of the two European American founding fathers, most of Harold Lasswell’s graduate students were Jewish[6]Ido Oren, Our Enemies and US: America’s Rivalries and the Making of Political Science, (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, (2003), 13. (e.g., Daniel Lerner, Abraham Kaplan, Gabriel Almond, Morris Janowitz, and Nathan Leites) and he also sponsored the Institute for Social Research’s project on anti-Semitism.[7]Thomas Wheatland, The Frankfurt School in Exile (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009), 384. The fourth, Carl Hoveland, had an equally Jewish coterie around him at Yale, where he operated a team of researchers along with Milton Rosenberg and Robert Abelson. Historian Hynek Jeřábek notes that Lazarsfeld’s influence in particular can’t be understated — by 1983, seven years after his death, “the directors of social research at the three largest media networks in the United States, CBS, ABC, and NBC were all his former students.”[8]Hynek Jeřábek, Paul Lazarsfeld and the Origins of Communications Research, (New York: Routledge, 2017), 18.Another Jew, Jay Blumler, has been called “a founding father of British media studies.”[9]James Curran, “Jay Blumler: A Founding Father of British Media Studies,” in Stephen Coleman (ed) Can the media save democracy? Essays in honour of Jay G. Blumler (London: Palgrave, 2015).

In fact, the Jewish dominance of the study of public opinion (and the potential for its manipulation) simply can’t be overstated. In addition to those already named, Joseph Klapper, Bernard Berelson, Fritz Heider, Leo Bogart, Elihu Katz, Marie Jahoda, Joseph Gittler, Morris Rosenberg, Ernest Dichter, Walter Weiss, Nathan Glazer, Bernard J. Fine, Bruno Bettelheim, Wallace Mandell, Hertha Hertzog, Dororthy Blumenstock, Stanley Schachter, David Caplovitz, Walter Lippmann, Sol Ginsburg, Harry Alpert, Leon Festinger, Michael Gurevitch, Edward Shils, Eugene Gaier, Joseph Goldsen, Julius Schreiber, Daniel Levinson, Herbert Blumer, I. M. A. Myers, Irving Janis, Miriam Reimann, Edward Sapir, Solomon Asch, and Gerald Wieder were just some of the hundreds of highly influential academics working in these fields that were born into Jewish families, associated heavily with other Jews, contributed work to Jewish organizations, married Jews, and yet concerned themselves with a degree of fanaticism with White opinion and ethnocentrism in America. This is to say nothing of their graduate students, who numbered in the thousands.

Despite some superficial differences in the titles of “opinion research,” “prejudice studies,” and “mass communications,” these academics all worked with each other to some degree, if not directly (in organisations or in co-written studies or papers) then via mutual associations. For example, it is a matter of historical fact that, in addition to three of the four founding fathers of mass communications research being Jews, all three were also very intimately involved with the Frankfurt School and the broader Jewish agenda to ‘adapt’ public opinion. Paul Lazarsfeld and Kurt Lewin, the two gurus of mass communication, together attended a 1944 conference on anti-Semitism organized by the research department of the American Jewish Committee (headed by Samuel H. Flowerman) and the Berkeley faction of the Frankfurt School in exile (headed by Theodor Adorno).[10]John P. Jackson and Nadine M. Weidman, Race, Racism, and Science: Social Impact and Interaction (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press), 176. David Kettler and Gerhard Lauer also point out that Lazarsfeld was in regular communication with Max Horkheimer, was “strongly supportive of the Horkheimer Circle and its work,” and even furnished the latter with “notes and recommendations for the Horkheimer Circle’s unpublished ‘Anti-Semitism Among American Labor.’”[11]David Kettler and Gerhard Lauer, Exile, Science and Bildung: The Contested Legacies of German Emigre Intellectuals(New York: Palgrave, 2005), 184. He was also a colleague at Columbia with and close confidante of, Leo Lowenthal.[12]James Schmidt, “The Eclipse of Reason and the End of the Frankfurt School in America,” New German Critique 100 (2007), 47-76, 47. By the late 1940s, Lazarsfeld’s ex-wife and mother of his child, Marie Jahoda, had even come to act as an American Jewish Committee liaison between Horkheimer and Samuel H. Flowerman, and co-wrote a number of articles on “prejudice” with Flowerman in Commentary.

One should by now begin to see clear connections forming between the American Jewish Committee, the Frankfurt School, “prejudice studies,” Jewish dominance of the academic field of “mass communications,” and, finally, the flow of influence from this field into the mass media (most clearly in the positions at CBS, ABC, and NBC quickly obtained by Lazarsfeld’s students). These connections will be important later.

A reasonable working hypothesis for such a sudden concentration of mutually networking Jews (often from different countries) in these areas of research would be that Jewish identity and Jewish interests played a significant part in their career choices, and that the trend was then accelerated by ethnic nepotism and promotion from within the group. Jeřábek appears to concur when he states that “Paul Lazarsfeld’s Jewish background, or the fact that many people around him in Vienna were Jewish, can help to explain his future affinities, friendships, or decisions.”[13]Jeřábek, Paul Lazarsfeld and the Origins of Communications Research, 23. Setting aside the deep historical context of conflict between Jews and Europeans, a contingent and contemporary explanation might be that Jews were moved into fields involving mass opinion and perceptions of prejudice because they were deeply disturbed by the rise of National Socialism.

A more general, but, perhaps more convincing explanation considering their activities over time, is that these Jews were in fact disturbed by any form of ethnically defined and assertive White host culture. For example, some of the foreign-born academics listed above, such as Marie Jahoda and Ernest Dichter, had even been arrested and detained in pre-Anschluss, pre-National Socialist Vienna as cultural and political subversives in the early 1930s. They then made their way to the United States or the United Kingdom where they more or less continued the same behavior. It is highly likely that these individuals sought both to understand and change the mechanics of opinion and mass communications in their host populations in order to make it more amenable to Jewish interests. When they were effectively exiled from one host population they merely transplanted their ambitions to a new one. The only alternative hypothesis, long used in Jewish apologetics for any similar instance of Jewish over-representation, is that huge numbers of mutually networking Jews convened in these disciplines purely by accident. Nathan Cofnas and Jordan Peterson, for example, might argue that Jews accidentally entered these areas of study en masse simply because they possessed high IQs and liked living in cities.

The problem with such reasoning is that the work produced by these academics and activists was so highly focused against White American opinion, rather than appearing random or accidental, that it strongly indicates these scholars entered the field of mass communications with a clear and common agenda. For example, Jewish mass communications scholar Bernard Berelson was not just a researcher in public opinion, but also conducted a series of propaganda tests on how to make White Americans find their own ethnocentrism abhorrent. In 1945 he conducted a study in which a cartoon was shown to the public that made connections between Fascism and American culture. The cartoon, titled “The Ghosts Go West…,” showed ghosts leaving the graves of Hitler, Mussolini, and Goebbels, and flying to America carrying a banner that read: “Down with Labour Unions, Foreign Born, Jews, Catholics, Negroes.” The message was clearly that “intolerance” in America was basically the demonic ghost of fascism. Interestingly, however, the study found that Jews exposed to the cartoon were so fixated on the banner that they missed the underlying message altogether and believed the cartoon was a far right creation. The potentially confusing nature of the piece meant it was never deployed as a “pro-tolerance” propaganda weapon.[14]Bureau of Applied Social Research, “The Ghosts Go West”: A Study of Comprehension, (Unpublished), 1945, Directed by Bernard B. Berelson. Cited in Flowerman, S. H., “Mass propaganda in the war against bigotry,” 438.

Berelson was also later a colleague and friend of Frederick S. Jaffe, the Jewish then-Vice President of Planned Parenthood. Both Jaffe and Berelson later became somewhat notorious because of a memo (known in history as the Jaffe Memo) sent in 1969 from the former to the latter, in which anti-White sociopath Jaffe put forth his own series of protocols that “included a table that summarized many proposals from various sources regarding population control. This table contained proposals such as compulsory abortions and sterilizations, encouraging homosexuality, and forcing women to work.” Both would also later work together on the infamous 1972 Rockefeller Commission Report which incorporated many of Jaffe’s proposals. We thus see more links between Jewishness, “prejudice studies,” the discipline of mass communications studies, and anti-White Jewish activism more generally.

Marie Jahoda
Marie Jahoda

In reality, the work of all these scholars orbited the same themes, if not openly, then more secretively (as in the case of Lazarsfeld’s work with the Institute for Social Research). Marie Jahoda, the ex-Austrian subversive, produced a series of studies that were mere variations on the theme of White ethnocentrism, something she pathologized most famously in Antisemitism and Emotional Disorder (1950).[15]See for example, “The dynamic basis of anti-Semitic attitudes,” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 2, (1948); “The evasion of propaganda: How prejudiced people respond to anti-prejudice propaganda” The Journal of Psychology, 23 (1947), 15-25; Studies in the scope and method of “The authoritarian personality. (New York, NY, US: Free Press, 1954); “Race relations in Public Housing,” Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 7, No. 1-2 (1951). In the same year, Morris Janowitz and Bruno Bettelheim worked together to produce Dynamics of Prejudice.[16]Morris Janowitz and Bruno Bettelheim, Dynamics of Prejudice (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1950). Meanwhile Joseph Gittler produced such works as “Measuring the Awareness of the Problem of Group Hostility,”[17]Joseph Gittler, “Measuring the Awareness of the Problem of Group Hostility,” Social Forces, Vol. 34, No. 2 (Dec., 1955), 163-167. and “Man and His Prejudices.”[18]Joseph Gittler, ”Man and His Prejudices,” The Scientific Monthly, 69 (1949 ), 43-47. Herbert Blumer produced “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position.”[19]Herbert Blumer, ““Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position,” Pacific Sociological Review, 1 (Spring 1958), 3-7. Fritz Heider worked with Kurt Lewin and Solomon Asch on unlocking the ways in which conformity could alter group behavior and individual opinions.[20]Irvin Rock and Stephen Palmer, “The Legacy of Gestalt Psychology,” Scientific American, Dec 1990, 84-90, 89. Ernest Dichter believed his studies of the mass communications in marketing could lead to the development of persuasive techniques that could “stop the new wave of anti-Semitism.”[21]Ernest Dichter, The Strategy of Desire (New York: Routledge, 2017), 15. The work of Walter Weiss concerned “mass communication, public opinion, and social change as they bear on changing racial attitudes.”[22]Bert T. King and Elliott McGinnies, Attitudes, Conflict, and Social Change (New York: Academic Press, 1972), 124. And aside from his secretive work with the Institute for Social Research, Paul Lazarsfeld, while working at the Bureau of Applied Social Research at Columbia University, introduced the notion of “social bookkeeping,” a systematic service that would note and evaluate “prejudice” in any material appearing in mass media of communications. I could go on.

What we see here is the origins of an extensive Jewish joint enterprise in which the unlocking and alteration of White American public opinion is the goal. This is not conspiracy theory, but an established and provable fact. In a sense, the Frankfurt School, or Institute for Social Research, was the tip of an iceberg. The work of Horkheimer, Adorno et al, both drew from, and enthused, a large and growing army of Jewish academics working in the fields of public opinion and mass communications. This was a body of academics and activists keen to translate theories on “prejudice and the authoritarian personality” into action — to change the opinions and thinking of the host population. They would go on to develop forms of testing and analysis to further these goals, and their students would go on to take dominant positions in the fields of the mass media and mass communications. In many cases these academics speak openly of the need for control of the media and the mass dissemination of sophisticated propaganda (all of which could be tried and perfected at the expense of their universities in the name of ‘prejudice research’). Of all these activists, however, none produced a work more bluntly subversive than Samuel Flowerman’s 1947 essay “Mass Propaganda in the War on Bigotry.” It is to the protocols of Samuel H. Flowerman that we now turn our attention.

“Millions of leaflets, pamphlets, cartoons, comic books, articles and more recently radio and movie scripts — have been produced and disseminated in the propaganda war.” Samuel H. Flowerman, Mass Propaganda in the War Against Bigotry, 1947.[23]Flowerman, S. H., “Mass propaganda in the war against bigotry,” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42(4), (1947) 429-439.

The Protocols of Samuel H. Flowerman

Samuel H. Flowerman, as Research Director at the American Jewish Committee, as colleague of the Institute for Social Research, and as a kind of hub for the expansive Jewish clique of mass communications scholars, was at the center of the drive to put Jewish “opinion research” initiatives into practical action. The clearest articulation of what this practical action would look like was articulated in his 1947 essay, “Mass Propaganda in the War Against Bigotry.” Flowerman’s foremost concern was that, although millions of dollars were being spent by organisations like the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League on propaganda, propaganda may not by itself be sufficient for the mass transformation of values in the host population — in particular, for the weakening of its ethnocentrism.

Flowerman begins by explaining the format and extent of existing efforts: “Millions of leaflets, pamphlets, cartoons, comic books, articles — and more recently radio and movie scripts — have been produced and disseminated in the propaganda war (429).” Flowerman’s use of the language of warfare is of course interesting in itself and will be discussed further below. For now, we should focus on what Flowerman lists as the five aims of the “propaganda war”:

  1. “The restructuring of the attitudes of prejudiced individuals, or at least their neutralization.”
  2. “The restructuring of group values toward intolerance.”
  3. “The reinforcement of attitudes of those already committed to a democratic ideology perhaps by creating an illusion of universality or victory.”
  4. “The continued neutralisation of those whose attitudes are yet unstructured and who are deemed “safer” if they remain immune to symbols of bias.”
  5. “Off-setting the counter-symbols of intolerance.” (429)

Flowerman concedes that the level of work and control required to achieve these aims would be extensive, and that the project was highly ambitious, seeking nothing less than “successful mass persuasion in the field of intergroup relations (429).” But he is equally clear in the conditions required for such success.

Flowerman’s first condition is “control by pro-tolerance groups or individuals of the channels of mass communication.” (430) Since Flowerman’s entire context of “pro-tolerance” activism was essentially Jewish, we may assume he is strongly implying that the channels of mass communication should fall into Jewish hands. Since “control” in Flowerman’s phrasing is not qualified, and since many newspapers, radio stations, and movie production companies were already in the hands of “pro-tolerance” Jews, the implication is also present that this control should be absolute. In addition, notes Flowerman, total control of these channels may still not be sufficient in itself. The host population will still need to be exposed to the productions of mass communications, and this was to be assured via “force, commercial monopoly, and/or crisis (designed or accidental).” (430) Only then would ‘pro-tolerance’ forces see “the persuasive devices and techniques of the elite playing upon the susceptibilities of the manipulated.” (430) Flowerman closes here with reference to Erich Fromm’s theory that people have “a desire
to be controlled.”

The second of Flowerman’s conditions for “successful mass persuasion in the field of intergroup relations” is saturation. This condition, like that of control and monopoly of the channels of mass communication, is intended as absolute. In other words, the message of “pro-tolerance” was to be ubiquitous and all-pervasive — beyond what was possible in 1947 and probably beyond what could even be conceptualized in 1947. In Flowerman’s words: “In addition to the large sums of money currently being expended on tolerance propaganda, significantly greater sums would probably be needed to achieve the degree of saturation — as yet hypothetical — required.” (430) The general idea here is to increase the “flow of pro-tolerance symbols” as a proportion of “the total stream of communications.”

In November 1946, a three-day convention, partly organized by Flowerman, was held in New York, bringing together “experts in the general field of public relations, including advertising, direct mail, film, radio, and press; professional workers on the staff of national and local agencies specifically concerned with fighting group discrimination; and social scientists from the universities and national defense agencies.”[24]S.H. Flowerman and M. Jahoda, “The study of man – can prejudice be fought scientifically?” Commentary, Dec., 1946. Jews, of course, dominated all of these areas, and the list of attendees included the previously mentioned figures Bruno Bettelheim, Sol Ginsburg, Hertha Herzog (radio research director of McCann-Erickson, Inc.), Julius Schreiber, Paul Lazarsfeld, Joseph Goldsen, and Morris Janowitz. One of the findings of the mass communications scholars present at the convention was that even control and saturation may not be sufficient for ensure a transformation of opinions and values in the demographic majority. This was the case when the propaganda encountered particularly strong-minded individuals, or when the propaganda got lost in the overall stream of communications that one encounters in the course of everyday life. Flowerman thus writes with frustration that “we are developing a nation of individuals who work, worry, love, and play while news commentators, comedians, opera companies, symphony orchestras, and swing bands are broadcasting. This continuous onslaught for ‘something for everyone’ results in a kind of ‘radio deafness.’” (431) In order to overcome this obstacle, Flowerman returns to a key aspect of his first condition — the use of crisis (he writes that this can be “designed or accidental”) to focus attention on delivered propaganda. Flowerman writes:

As for overcoming the ‘radio deafness’ to commercial announcements and the general atmosphere of make-believe of radio entertainment, only symbols associated with acute crisis would seem to have a chance. For the great bulk of American people racial and religious intolerance is not regarded as a critical situation. … The absence of critical stress serves to diminish levels of attention to pro-tolerance symbols. (431)

Practical contemporary examples of what this tactic might look light would be the ubiquity of pro-diversity propaganda in the aftermath of Islamic attacks, Charlottesville, school shootings, moral panics about racism, ADL hype about the ever-present threat of anti-Semitism, murders by immigrants, and migrant drownings in the Mediterranean. The point here is that regardless of context, “crisis” is to be manufactured into almost every situation in order to focus attention on the real goal — the successful delivery of “pro-tolerance” messages, even (or especially) in circumstances in which tolerance has proven deadly, to the host population. Jews or, in the more ambiguous phrasing, “the agents of pro-tolerance,” would thus need to achieve (in Flowerman’s own words) the ambitious trifecta of “control, saturation, crisis.” (432) Crisis is therefore Flowerman’s third condition.

The fourth condition is the achievement of an alteration of predispositions in the individual via modification of their surroundings and peer pressure. Here Flowerman argues that “pro-tolerance” propaganda should not rely on intellectual means but instead on “social perception, which is affected by the predispositions of the audience. In turn, these dispositions are affect-laden attitudes which may have been produced by parents, teachers, playmates, etc.” (432)

The point here is that Flowerman and the mass communications clique believed that their propaganda would be better received by the masses if the psychological context of reception was itself changed. In other words, people raised in the demographic majority who are imbued with a sense of communal pride, social responsibility, cultural achievement, and national purpose are unlikely to be predisposed to be receptive to messages on behalf of outsiders. Some intervention in peer interactions and peer culture was thus necessary in order to break up such an obstacle to the reception of “pro-tolerance” propaganda. As just one example, we return here to Flowerman’s 1950 article for New York Times Magazine in which he argues for the training of teachers “as engineers of human relations instead of instructors of arithmetic and spelling.”[25]S. H. Flowerman, “Portrait of the Authoritarian Man,” New York Times Magazine, April 23 1950, 31. Children can thus “engineered” to be more receptive to “pro-tolerance” propaganda in adulthood.

This condition bleeds into the fifth — the manipulation of the basic instinct of humans to conform to group standards. Flowerman writes:

Consciously or unconsciously, individuals use group frames of reference in social situations even when they are physically separated from the group. … The strength of group sanctions is a potent force to reckon with even for an individual with a strong ego. … It would appear, then, that to be successful mass propaganda on behalf of out-groups would have to modify the standards of the in-group. … Mass pro-tolerance propaganda, to be successful, would have to change such values, which would be difficult to imagine without control, saturation, crisis, etc. (432)

What Flowerman is proposing here is essentially a revolution in values, after which a politically correct culture emerges where the demographic majority becomes self-policing and antagonistic to its own ethnic interests. In this environment — achieved via “control, saturation, crisis”— the strength of group sanctions among the White American in-group is directed towards manifestations of in-group ethnocentrism instead of outsiders. It’s nothing less than a proposal for the cultivation of White guilt and pathological altruism, and the diminishment of White ethnocentrism and cultural pride.

The sixth condition is the cultivation of influential figures on behalf of the “pro-tolerance” agenda. This required great subtlety. Flowerman writes that the research of his mass communications colleagues and co-ethics shows the targets of their propaganda:

are willing to assign to some individuals a stamp of approval which they deny to others … We know that many leaflets written and endorsed by popular heroes and accepted even by prejudiced individuals are often dismissed on the ground that they are being distributed by minority groups in their own self-interest. Many prejudiced individuals cannot conceive of such distribution by dominant groups. (433)

What Flowerman is here complaining of is the fact that some members of the demographic majority are perceptive enough to accurately point out the real origin of “pro-tolerance” propaganda, and to dismiss it on those grounds. By “minority groups,” the coy Mr Flowerman of course means Jews. He then cites a specific case:

In an experiment being conducted at the University of Chicago by Bettelheim, Shils, and Janowitz, veterans were exposed to pro-tolerance propaganda including a cartoon by Bill Mauldin. A prejudiced respondent, sharing the general esteem in which this popular soldier-cartoonist is held by ex-GI’s, said that he had regarded Mauldin as a “regular guy” but he supposed that if you paid a man enough you could get him to do anything; this respondent believed that the material he saw was being distributed by “a bunch of New York communists.” (433)

Thus we see the pathologisation of a veteran because he perceived with stunning accuracy the hand of subversion behind the use of a popular icon to promote an agenda entirely alien to his interests. Despite exceptions such as this veteran, the overall susceptibility of the masses was deemed sufficiently high for the strategy of “sponsorship” to be progressed. As a result, reports Flowerman,

propagandists, recognising the need for impeccable sources of authority, are producing material endorsed by popular heroes in sports, entertainment, and in the armed forces. Recently a plan has been developed to promote the insertion of full-page newspaper advertisements paid for and sponsored by “respectable” local business organizations. The effect of this campaign will have to be determined. (433)

Developed alongside his colleagues in the Institute for Social Research and the mass communications clique, these, then, are Flowerman’s six conditions for a radical transformation of values in the White American demographic majority:

  1. Control of the channels of mass communications;
  2. Saturation with Pro-tolerance messages;
  3. Crisis, designed or accidental;
  4. Diminishment of Cultural Pride and Self-esteem;
  5. Cultivation of Self-Punishment and Group Self-Sanctioning;
  6. Sponsorship of willing dupes or traitors.

Although these six conditions form most of the body of “Mass Propaganda in the War Against Bigotry,” Flowerman also spends some time discussing the ideal content of “pro-tolerance” propaganda. In this regard, he comments:

The most striking feature, the spearhead, of propaganda, is the slogan. … Current pro-tolerance or anti-intolerance slogans urge unity and amity, warn against being divided by differences of race and religion, describe our common origin as immigrants to these shores, remove myths about racial differences, and denounce bigots and bigotry. Some popular slogans are: Don’t be a Sucker!, Americans All – Immigrants All, All Races and All Creeds Working Together etc.

Don’t Be A Sucker! was the name of a wartime film produced by the Army Signals Corps at a time when it was working heavily alongside Jewish Hollywood executives and script writers; its film production center was headed by Col. Emmanuel ‘Manny’ Cohen.[26]See for example, Richard Koszarski, “Subway Commandos: Hollywood Filmmakers at the Signal Corps Photographic Center,” Film History Vol. 14, No. 3/4, (2002), 296-315. According to Wikipedia, the film:

has anti-racist and anti-fascist themes, and was made to educate viewers about prejudice and discrimination. The film was also made to make the case for the desegregation of the United States armed forces. An American who has been listening to a racist and bigoted rabble-rouser, who is preaching hate speech against ethnic and religious minorities and immigrants, is warned off by a naturalized Hungarian immigrant, possibly a Holocaust survivor or escapee, who explains to him how such rhetoric and demagogy allowed the Nazis to rise to power in Weimar Germany, and warns Americans not to fall for similar demagogy propagated by American racists and bigots. In August 2017 the short film went viral on the internet in the aftermath of the violent Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia and various copies have been uploaded to video sharing sites in the past year.

Flowerman was dissatisfied with the slogans of his time, however, believing them to be too “general in nature, vague as to goals, and unspecific as to methods.” (434) He believed that merely defining fascism as the enemy was insufficient because, at that time, the host population believed “fascism was strictly a foreign phenomenon characteristic particularly of Nazi Germany.” Propaganda depicting fascism as the enemy was therefore going to be ineffective in making the host population see its own values as oppositional and requiring destruction. Referring to works like The Authoritarian Personality, Flowerman writes: “Studies abound in which subjects subscribed to tenets of fascism although they rejected the fascist label itself. The pervasiveness of prejudice in so many individuals makes it difficult to set up a real enemy.” (434) He acknowledges that “in much anti-intolerance propaganda” the enemy is defined as “white, native-born Protestants,” but makes it clear that he wishes this to be expanded “for logical and psychological reasons.” One gets the impression that “Diversity is our Strength” and “Fight Hate” would have been much to his satisfaction.

* * *

We now find ourselves returning to our point of departure. “The whole story is transparently barmy,” said the Guardian’s Jason Wilson when discussing “conspiracy theories” about Cultural Marxism. Consider again what he says this “conspiracy theory” amounts to:

The vogue for the ideas of theorists like Herbert Marcuse and Theodor Adorno in the 1960s counterculture culminated with their acolytes’ occupation of the commanding heights of the most important cultural institutions, from universities to Hollywood studios. There, the conspiracy says, they promoted and even enforced ideas which were intended to destroy traditional Christian values and overthrow free enterprise: feminism, multiculturalism, gay rights and atheism. And this, apparently, is where political correctness came from. I promise you: this is what they really think … The theory of cultural Marxism is also blatantly antisemitic, drawing on the idea of Jews as a fifth column bringing down western civilisation from within, a racist trope that has a longer history than Marxism.

In light of the facts addressed in this essay, such a theory would seem thoroughly borne out, with the only required alterations being that the process started before the 1960s and involved many more figures than the staff of the Institute for Social Research. The problem with people like Wilson is that they are proof of the very ‘conspiracy theory’ they refute. Raised in a controlled media, saturated with pro-tolerance propaganda, psychologically blasted with crisis after crisis, stripped of cultural pride, consumed by White guilt, and influenced by purchased “sponsors,” he is the perfectly gullible product of the protocols of Samuel H. Flowerman and the mass communications clique.

Not barmy, but more or less ridiculous, Wilson becomes an intellectual pygmy biting at the heels of his betters — those who, like the veteran in the study of Bettelheim, Shils, and Janowitz, see the true origin of the propaganda and are pathologized for their perceptivity.

Notes

[1] Flowerman, S. H., “Mass propaganda in the war against bigotry,” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42(4), (1947) 429-439.

[2] D. M. Scott, “Postwar Pluralism, Brown v. Board of Education, and the Origins of Multicultural Education,” Journal of American History, Vol 91, No 1 (2004), 69–82.

[3] For an example of Flowerman’s thoughts on Freud and psychoanalysis see S. H. Flowerman, “Psychoanalytic Theory and Science,” American Journal of Psychotherapy, Vol. 8, No. 3, 415-441.

[4] S. H. Flowerman, “Portrait of the Authoritarian Man,” New York Times Magazine, April 23 1950, 31.

[5] Herbert Greenberg, “The Effects of Single-Session Education Techniques on Prejudice Attitudes,” The Journal of Educational Sociology, Vol. 31, No. 2 (1957), 82-86, 82.

[6] Ido Oren, Our Enemies and US: America’s Rivalries and the Making of Political Science, (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, (2003), 13.

[7] Thomas Wheatland, The Frankfurt School in Exile (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009), 384.

[8] Hynek Jeřábek, Paul Lazarsfeld and the Origins of Communications Research, (New York: Routledge, 2017), 18.

[9] James Curran, “Jay Blumler: A Founding Father of British Media Studies,” in Stephen Coleman (ed) Can the media save democracy? Essays in honour of Jay G. Blumler (London: Palgrave, 2015).

[10] John P. Jackson and Nadine M. Weidman, Race, Racism, and Science: Social Impact and Interaction (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press), 176.

[11] David Kettler and Gerhard Lauer, Exile, Science and Bildung: The Contested Legacies of German Emigre Intellectuals(New York: Palgrave, 2005), 184.

[12] James Schmidt, “The Eclipse of Reason and the End of the Frankfurt School in America,” New German Critique 100 (2007), 47-76, 47.

[13] Jeřábek, Paul Lazarsfeld and the Origins of Communications Research, 23.

[14] Bureau of Applied Social Research, “The Ghosts Go West”: A Study of Comprehension, (Unpublished), 1945, Directed by Bernard B. Berelson. Cited in Flowerman, S. H., “Mass propaganda in the war against bigotry,” 438.

[15] See for example, “The dynamic basis of anti-Semitic attitudes,” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 2, (1948); “The evasion of propaganda: How prejudiced people respond to anti-prejudice propaganda” The Journal of Psychology, 23 (1947), 15-25; Studies in the scope and method of “The authoritarian personality. (New York, NY, US: Free Press, 1954); “Race relations in Public Housing,” Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 7, No. 1-2 (1951).

[16] Morris Janowitz and Bruno Bettelheim, Dynamics of Prejudice (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1950).

[17] Joseph Gittler, “Measuring the Awareness of the Problem of Group Hostility,” Social Forces, Vol. 34, No. 2 (Dec., 1955), 163-167.

[18] Joseph Gittler, ”Man and His Prejudices,” The Scientific Monthly, 69 (1949 ), 43-47.

[19] Herbert Blumer, ““Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position,” Pacific Sociological Review, 1 (Spring 1958), 3-7.

[20] Irvin Rock and Stephen Palmer, “The Legacy of Gestalt Psychology,” Scientific American, Dec 1990, 84-90, 89.

[21] Ernest Dichter, The Strategy of Desire (New York: Routledge, 2017), 15.

[22] Bert T. King and Elliott McGinnies, Attitudes, Conflict, and Social Change (New York: Academic Press, 1972), 124.

[23] Flowerman, S. H., “Mass propaganda in the war against bigotry,” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42(4), (1947) 429-439.

[24] S.H. Flowerman and M. Jahoda, “The study of man – can prejudice be fought scientifically?” Commentary, Dec., 1946.

[25] S. H. Flowerman, “Portrait of the Authoritarian Man,” New York Times Magazine, April 23 1950, 31.

[26] See for example, Richard Koszarski, “Subway Commandos: Hollywood Filmmakers at the Signal Corps Photographic Center,” Film History Vol. 14, No. 3/4, (2002), 296-315.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 122 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. m___ says:

    The whole of the piece.

    Very interesting take. Documenting goes a long way to modulate intuition.

  2. Brilliant work, Dr. Joyce! I’m so glad Unz publishes quality work like this.

    Flowerman writes: “Studies abound in which subjects subscribed to tenets of fascism although they rejected the fascist label itself …”

    Sort of like how the followers of Cultural Marxism subscribe to the tenets of Cultural Marxism although they reject the label itself? My own anecdotal experience abounds in these cases!

  3. conatus says:

    In Solomon Asch’s conformity experiments he would instruct four actors to chose the wrong answer, an incorrect answer that was visible right in front of your eyes, such as
    ‘Which line is of equal length?’ The results?: A third of the time, the fifth person who was not in on the plan, would go along with the incorrect answer even though it was right in front of his eyes. The unsuspecting participant would conform to the wrong answer a third of the time, even though a grammar school child could tell the answer was wrong.
    This says a lot about being crowded and cooperative. In 1800 ninety per cent of us worked on subsistence farms, were independent and were not dependent on others for our livelihood. We were independent yeomen farmers.We made independent decisions back then.
    Now 90% of us work in large organizations(with HR Departments) and live in crowded neighborhoods and we are more dependent on others and go-along more to survive. Our conformity quotients are higher because we lead more crowded lives.
    It is a natural response to a more peopled life, however it would be nice if this experiment was discussed more often so we would be forewarned about our natural eye-darting conformist tendencies.

    • Agree: Triumph104
    • Replies: @Anon
  4. The type of person who works at The Guardian is fully-aware that jews control the media. It’s not that they disbelieve in the fact of jewish control, they simply deny that it’s true, because they are slaves.

    • Agree: Dr. Krieger, Moi
    • Replies: @Anon834
  5. anon[146] • Disclaimer says:

    Jews have (COLLECTIVELY) done much harm to the west and to white nations generally.

  6. Your analysis is correct. I’ve researched this stuff for years and you hit every major tenet. What’s really scary is how effective a small group of people can be when they ban together with a singularity of purpose using the weaponization of race, antisemetism, and victimization to engender that they are the “Chosen Ones” and anyone who denies that is evil. It’s quite an amazing feat and it present a harsh look of the reality why this tribe has been thrown out of every country, kingdom, and province over time.

  7. Impressive. If only someone would plug the Protocols of Flowerman into the Beatles music and memes… And, yes, Paul’s the cutest as well as the best musician from the group. Then get us up to speed with the dreaded yet obvious Marilyn Manson.

  8. The Jew capacity for hatred and murderous destruction is unparalleled.

    They are vermin

    • Replies: @Miggle
  9. The question is WHY mass media degrades the non-Jews more than the Jew?

    Presumably every Jewish girl could aspire to be Amy Winehouse and ended up dead from crack cocaine? They didn’t.

    BEASTIE BOYS were the first whigger group. They predated Eminem by an entire decade. But Jews were not influenced by them to be whiggers as Eminem influenced whites.

    Porn, comediennes like Andrew Dice Clay or Sarah Silverman etc. have not degraded Jewish children themselves to any great degree. Their out-of-wedlock birth rate has not risen. You don’t see many Jewish pregnant girls down at the country welfare office.

    Jews don’t aspire to be the sort of thugs that Bronson-protege Jeff Goldblum played in Death Wish and St. Ives.

    It begs the question. Why does this affect non-Jews but not Jews themselves?

    Mexicans have gotten blacks and rednecks hooked on every new drug they pumped into North America-cocaine in the 80′s, then meth, now heroin.

    But Jews have largely been affected by this.

    Asian-Americans are not overly-affected either.

    So we have to ask ourselves WHY the Anglo-Saxon is so affected by the mass media or popular culture. Why they don’t seem to have the cultural anchor that Jews or Asians do.

  10. Anonymous[126] • Disclaimer says:

    We’ve observed 2000 years of “mass communications in their host populations” with the Jew Testament mass-printed and found in nearly every home.

    “For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.” (Romans 15:27)

    Talk about making a host population “more amenable to Jewish interests.” Wow!

  11. Andrew Joyce writes another highly perceptive piece. He’s an extraordinary scholar. Joyce, along with Kevin McDonald and a few other daring intellectuals, is leading the explosive, taboo-busting movement that dares to analyze and unmask the strategic sabotage of White Europe and White America by a global network of Jewish intellectuals, activist billionaires, and their galaxy of organizations, federations, corporations, committees, and academic cliques. Blowing the whistle on their global machinations is dangerous work, as our adversaries are in a class by themselves also. They are super-aggressive, hyper-powerful, and they will stop at nothing.

    It is now clear that Europe and America’s once-dominant White cultures are being transformed against the will of their peoples. Why? So that ‘minorities’ (and particularly Jews) can be feel safe, welcome and supreme even among the more-numerous White folk who (as we all know) can sometimes be ‘racist’ (i.e., see themselves as genetically distinct and worth preserving).

    This position (racial self-preservation) is considered reactionary and xenophobic when practiced by Whites. White nationalism (just the inclination to preserve a White nation’s core demography) now equals ‘white supremacism’. BAD!

    That’s right, children, this racist attitude is very dangerous as well as extremely ‘intolerant’.

    Don’t believe so?

    Just ask any proud, Zionist, ethnic-cleansing Jew. He will tell you.

    Ironically, it is the residual ‘racist’ thinking (by Whites) that apparently threatens all of humanity. Don’t believe me? Listen to that expert! Watch that Academy-award-winning movie! Read that bestselling book! The message is clear. The chorus is in sync.

    Whiteness and ‘white privilege’ still threaten the spectacular (though tragic) rise of ‘persecuted’ Jews, ‘disadvantaged’ blacks, ‘oppressed’ gays, as well as numerous other outcast groups who automatically deserve a leg up in our nation of immigrants.

    What we have here is an insidious war by deception. It’s fake news that’s too omnipresent, too polished, and too immense to fully comprehend.

    But why should advanced Westerners voluntarily surrender their extraordinary civilizations and innovative cultures to hoards of resentful invaders? The very idea is absurd on its face.

    Yet it’s happening.

    Most Europeans and most European-derived Americans wish to retain their orderly and innovative cultures. This is wrong? If not, then historic levels of White homogeneity should be preserved in these White civilizations. Demographics determine a nation’s character. Why not preserve them?

    Because it’s racist.

    Without commonality and tradition and continuity however a nation is lost. It becomes merely a spot on a map. Even the Dali Lama said as much. He recently urged non-Europeans to return to their native lands and to give Europe back to Europeans. The (((MSM))) pretty much ignored this, but it resonated with this Euro-American. Is such advice not sane and sensible? Of course it is. But (((Big Media))) says otherwise.

    Multiculturalism is a failing experiment. And the changes it brings can be irreversible. Meanwhile, ‘democratic’ Israel is marginalizing its non-Jews, caging them in ghettos, or expelling them altogether. Failing that, Israel just shoots or bombs them.

    Jews know the value of commonality, similarity, national cohesion, trust and prosperity.

    On the other hand, the multicultural Kool Aid that they are marketing outside of Israel is strictly for the goyim.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @wayfarer
  12. anarchyst says:

    During the first so-called “civil-rights” movement, we used to have a saying: Behind every Negro, there is a Jew”. It was no secret that Jews were behind the “civil-rights” movement of the 1950s and 1960s.
    From personal experiences, blacks were not the “non-violent” types who only wanted “equality”, but were always violent racists who demanded that “whitey” acquiesce to their “wants and needs”, quite often taking by force (stealing) what they felt should have been theirs.
    Growing up in 1950s Detroit (which was still a livable city), us whites had to be wary of blacks. Black criminality was quite often ignored by “the powers that be”, the “excuses” being the “racism” and “discrimination” that blacks lived under. This was all orchestrated by the jew civil-rights “experts” and imposed a massive guilt trip on us whites. Of course,our protests against integration were drowned out by the jews and the mainstream media of the time, which demonized whites, even back then. Us whites retreated into our shells, being careful not to offend the jews and their “pets”–blacks, but in the backs of our minds, we knew, even then that the whole “civil-rights” movement was a major factor in the destruction of our society.
    Civil-rights policies initiated in the 1970s didn’t help, either. The imposition of “affirmative action” and the outlawing of aptitude tests for employment assured that substandard, unqualified blacks would be pushed into the workforce. Of course, large corporations could easily absorb the incompetence by hiring qualified whites to mentor unqualified blacks, but what about small businesses?
    Even liberal whites are seeing that this whole “civil-rights” deal is a massive scam perpetrated on whites.

  13. Anon834 says:
    @Staudegger

    Absolutely. As a non-Jew who worked years for an international news organization staffed primarily with Jews, I can tell you the only way to survive is to hold your nose, keep your mouth tightly shut, and take the checks until you can move on. And moving on will entail having to sign a lengthy, insanely detailed non-disclosure agreement in which you are sworn to sacrifice the lives of your children, and your children’s children, if you should ever dare to say or write one negative word about the company or its staff.

    • Replies: @Moi
  14. utu says:

    Nathan Cofnas and Jordan Peterson, for example, might argue that Jews accidentally entered these areas of study en masse simply because they possessed high IQs and liked living in cities.

    No just Cofnas and Peterson but also Cochran, Sailer, Murray, Derbyshire. The raise of IQism and and its popularity did not come from the fact that Afro-Americans became more stupid and more unruly recently but because Jews gained more power and needed an alibi for it that masses would swallow if they began noticing. Peterson, Cochran, Sailer, Murray, Derbyshire are useful propagandists. Cochran is solely preoccupied with Jewish supremacy while Sailer, Murray, Derbyshire do it under the veneer of anti-Black animus. All those who read them while being able to vent their frustrations with the Blacks will eat up the Jewish superiority meme in the process. That’s how the game is played. Both sides against the middle. This is also a good illustration that slavery is the gift that keeps on giving for our masters. There is nothing simpler than control of the multi-ethnic society by playing on identity groups animosities and resentments.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    , @Wizard of Oz
  15. The key to the Zionist control of America is the Zionist bankers privately 0wned FED and IRS and when a cabal of Zionist bankers can create money out of thin air and loan it to the government and the people and charge them interest on this ether created money and tax the people then the control over all else follows, and since 1913 America has been a captive nation of the Zionists.

    Nathan Rothschild once famously said, paraphrasing; I care not who sits on the throne, but give me the control of the money supply and I will control that nation, and here in America the Zionist banking cabal controls the FED and controls the country and from this flows the control of the MSM and the MIC and the GOVERNMENT.

    The Zionist control of America was shown on 911 via Israel and the Zionist controlled deep state attack on the WTC and the Zionists got away with it and every thinking American knows that Israel and the Zionists did it.

    The enemy is not at the gates, the enemy is inside the American government and is subverting every aspect of American life and culture.

  16. Agent76 says:

    Jan 7, 2014 Rule from the Shadows – The Psychology of Power – Part 1

    Time to look behind the curtain. Sources, full transcript and bonus footage

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  17. The use of the expression “cultural Marxism” (whatever that may mean!) always makes people laugh in Europe and we tend to assume, as Jason Wilson does, that the person using that expression is indeed “barmy”.

  18. Miggle says:
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    The Jew capacity for hatred and murderous destruction is unparalleled.

    They are vermin.

    Can you say that about the average Jew?

    • Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter
  19. @DESERT FOX

    In regards to Zionist influence , recommend an article in Russia-insider.com on communist infiltration of the catholic church, this article is on the home page today.

    • Replies: @Anon
  20. Anon[754] • Disclaimer says:
    @mark green

    But why should advanced Westerners voluntarily surrender their extraordinary civilizations and innovative cultures to hoards of resentful invaders?

    ♫ Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious, in his sight! ♪

    “Christianity, sprung from Jewish roots and comprehensible only as a growth on this soil, represents the counter-movement to any morality of breeding, of race, privilege: it is the anti-Aryan religion par excellence. Christianity—the revaluation of all Aryan values, the victory of chandala values, the gospel preached to the poor and base, the general revolt of all the downtrodden, the wretched, the failures, the less favored, against ‘race:’ the undying chandala hatred is disguised as a religion of love.” -Friedrich Nietzsche

    Christianity is the destroyer. Jewsus said so himself.

    • I have come to turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. A man’s enemies will be the members of his own household. (Matthew 10:34-36)
    • I have come to ignite a fire on the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled! (Luke 12:49-53)

    You don’t believe him? I do.

    • Troll: utu
    • Replies: @Josecanuc
  21. We as a people have collectively been deceived by our most ancient mortal enemies to all them to control us and dictate their terms to rule over us without firing a shot.

    It begins with the Western understanding of the Old Testament, one where the “hand of god” is pushing the events of history. What in reality the Old Testament is, it is the most effective piece of propaganda in world history. Read the Old Testament free from the the delusions of grandeur ascribed to it and one sees a brutal, conniving people commit atrocity upon atrocity against their neighbors all with the active support of “their god.” Viewing in this light, the ancient traditions of bloodlust, subterfuge and insurrection are unescapable as well as very relevant to the current epoch.

    The most applicable lesson of this “minority” in their malice against host populations is the Easter Sunday in which the Jewish inhabitants of the Spanish city of Toledo opened the city gates to Muslim invaders as the city’s Christians were attending Easter Mass – they then locked the Christians out from their own city. It took the Spanish 700 years to free itself from the Moors and the Jews. Once this was accomplished Spain entered its golden age of prosperity. It is more than just coincidence that Columbus, financed by Spain discovered the New World in 1492, with 1492 marking the expulsion of the Moors and Jews.

    Are we not in the process right now of having the gates to everyone of our cities thrown open by jews to foreign invaders as we ourselves are locked out of our own homes once again?

    I have been around jews all of my life. When they forget that they are not amongst their own and let their guard slip they reveal themselves to be well – typical jews.

    Their outright hatred for Ethnic Europeans seethes beneath their carefully cultivated expressions. When they find themselves in power they do as they do in Palestine – terrorizing their neighbors. Spiteful, petty attacks meant to force their targets to leave or lash out and face the full force of the secular authorities whom notoriously have jews atop them.

    I was the lone Christian family in a neighborhood of jews in what the Learned Reverend Jesse Jackson lovingly referred to as “Hymie Town.” From the day we moved in we were attacked, our cars repeatedly vandalized – crucifixes carved into the fenders, our Christmas lights repeatedly smashed, our dog poisoned and the jew neighbor caught in the act – but the secular authorities with a jew mediator refused to grant justice to a goyim.

    I can vividly recall all the way through college at how jews were insular in public and vicious in private to their “goyim” classmates and students.

    Once you understand the collective malice this group has for “Whites” the historical lengths they have gone through to destroy our civilization and once again throw open the Gates of Toledo make perfect sense.

    History belongs to the victors, but it is the history keepers who have the ability to incinerate entire chapters they deem antisemitic. Samuel Roth wrote: “The next time you read about a particularly bloody pogrom and pause to wonder how Christians, dedicated to a religion of mercy, can exercise so much brutality against the Jews, remember that the Jew wheedles all the mercy out of his neighbors in the ordinary course of business. He lies and cheats until he is caught. When caught, instead of accepting punishment, he moans and tears his hair, invokes the sores of ancestors in their graves and living relations at the point of death in hospitals, until the wronged gentile, nauseated, lets him go. Then, thumbing his nose at the gentile behind his back, the Jew goes about his business the same way, lying and cheating now doubly to make up for lost time. A pogrom is usually the climax of years of such relentless goading. Do you wonder that when the final reckoning comes the gentile is absolutely merciless?”
                –  Samuel Roth, Jews Must Live, Ch. 13, p. 206, f/n 31

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  22. Anon[754] • Disclaimer says:
    @DESERT FOX

    Communist infiltration of the catholic church is a comical phrase, since it was Bolshevist from the very start.

    • “Not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them…and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.” Acts 4:32-35

    •”Anyone who has two shirts should share with the one who has none, and anyone who has food should do the same.” (Luke 3:11)

    “…Christianity is Bolshevism…Jesus’s words are full of resentment against the rich, and the Apostles are no meeker in this respect.”

    Ludwig von Mises
    Socialism, pp. 413-420

    • Replies: @Sic Semper
  23. crimson2 says:

    a politically correct culture in which Whites, via peer pressure, conformed to new values — values much more user-friendly to Jews.

    Sounds like a good plan. This is really only a problem if you’re a racist ideologue.

    What we see here is the origins of an extensive Jewish joint enterprise in which the unlocking and alteration of White American public opinion is the goal. This is not conspiracy theory, but an established and provable fact.

    Let me get this straight. Some Jews got together with others and used ideas and communication to convince people that white supremacy was dumb and deluded and damaging. And they were largely successful.

    You’re right. This is not a conspiracy theory. It’s defeating an ideology. I have to say it makes me like Jews more, not less.

    So we went from a bunch of idiots throwing rotten fruit at Ruby Bridges and threatening her life to those people being marginalized and ignored? Sounds great!

  24. @Anon

    I am an ex-Catholic, a dozen years of Catholic schooling and decades of witnessing how the “church” is more concerned with its power, finances and apparently selling its faithful while concerning itself over the plight of its own faithfuls’ most malevolent attackers.

    Christ in his teachings wasn’t a bolshevik seeking to confiscate and concentrate wealth into a select fews hands. His message was transformational in using wealth to ease suffering – but doing so because one believed it was right to do so, not doing so by force.

    That said, Christians cannot survive in a world were the message of good deeds is co-opted to use against us in our enemy’s plot to exterminate us.

    If anything we need to co-opt Christianity to serve our own needs. The Crucifixion really should serve as our Skull and Cross Bones warning of what happens when our most mortal enemies use the secular authorities against those who seek only peace and good deeds. THIS IS WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO YOU! Should be the new INRI nailed above the murdered Christ’s head as a warning to all of us.

  25. @DESERT FOX

    The interesting thing about the Jew Mafia (I mean that literally) is how they have brainwashed all Jews and even most Christians with this Jewish holocaust myth. The propaganda technique which accomplishes this is called classical conditioning. We have all learned about Pavlov’s dogs. Ring the bell, associate it with food, and pretty soon the dogs start salivating when they hear the bell.

    Now tell a holocaust brainwashed person that you do not believe their holocaust myth (i.e., ring the bell), and watch them start salivating and doing the little dance of agitation, fear, and anger. I call it the “Jew Dance” and it is very visible. This is not a rational response. It is a result of brainwashing and conditioning beginning when they are children.

  26. crimson2 says:

    In light of the facts addressed in this essay, such a theory would seem thoroughly borne out

    Uh, no.

    There, the conspiracy says, they promoted and even enforced ideas which were intended to destroy traditional Christian values and overthrow free enterprise: feminism, multiculturalism, gay rights and atheism.

    This is the conspiracy theory. Were people against prejudice and racism? Yes. Of course. Were they trying to destroy free enterprise, Christian values or America? No.

    I know this must seem convincing to white nationalists here at Unz. But it’s an idiotic conspiracy. Combating prejudice was a goal in its own right. There was no attempt to destroy capitalism. And the opposition to bigotry certainly didn’t destroy capitalism in any way. Basically this article says “We hate that it became socially unacceptable to call people the n-word and to discriminate against minorities!” Well, we KNOW you hate that. We just don’t care.

    • Replies: @Rich
    , @phil
  27. Agent76 says:

    Mar 20, 2015 The Cycle of The State

    Daniel Sanchez combines the theories of Robert Higgs and Hans-Hermann Hoppe to form a theory of the cycle of the state.

  28. joe webb says:

    a follow-up article on the theme of how effective the Jewish (and other) Communication sappers are these days, would be very interesting.

    Trump’s peasantry does not read the jew news, and so on. While Fox Jews still salutes the flag of Israel, most revealingly is the fact that Fox does not report on Israel and the Middle East very much, except for Syria, etc. There is close to zero Israel worship there. Hannity salutes the Jew Flag, but again, it is very curtailed.

    Tucker Carlson, a few weeks ago , had on a military guy and the Jewish Greenwald (spelling?). Tucker asked them why all these wars? one of them, speaking for both of them, said, “Riad and Tel Aviv.”

    That is about as close to the third rail as Tucker is allowed to go I guess. Code, but not so much so, that the average Fox News viewer cannot get it

    More generally, Trump, while saluting the Israeli flag, does not do it with much gusto. He has his constituencies…..

    A few days ago, I comnmented on the current Derbyshire article and uttered some discouraging words about the coming US Civil War, part 2. This comment was not permitted, either by Derb or an Unz moderator. Too discouraging I guess, or , too hopeful, or too realistic, in that I suggested that the Kavanaugh Hearings would be commemorated as the official Beginning of the next US civil war.

    Point: my sense is that Jew-Prop has overreached itself. Even Tucker will reference SPLC as itself a terrorit organization, or a similar remark.

    My local lib-rad bookstore in Menlo Park, CA. features many new books on the Liberal Sky Falling.

    These folks are themselves way into overstatement, or not. If you think about the Kavanaugh Hearings right now, the overreach to put it politely, of the Dems is manifest. Assuming that the FBI search underway right now, comes up with nothing. It will be a great victory , propaganda and otherwise, for Trumpism, whatever that is.

    For sure, it is a sign of the Overcoming of liberal and Jewish propaganda.

    What the communists of the 20s and thru the era described by Joyce, operated on intellectually, was a Belief in the Blank Slate, more or less. Today with all the biological information of genes and the brain, we have in effect stolen a march on the Jewish subversives. There is a much stronger awareness now, everywhere, even while it is frantically denied by the Left…a measure of their alarm…of the biologically based blood and soil character of the human brain.

    The propaganda of Integration, School Busing, Affirmative Action, and the like, even as I just discovered, the totalitarian Liberal State’s intrusion into adoption practice demanding Equal Opportunity for non-white babies to get into White families, is on the ropes both institutionally and intellectually.

    Liberalism is in crisis. And the intellectual crisis is being provoked by the streets and polling places. This reverses the familiar and old Saul Alinsky communist Revolution from the TOP, or the March Thru the Institutions.

    Now the Counter-Revolution is From the Bottom, the Streets, where any genuine revolution really comes from.

    Nobody on the streets reads the Jew York times, or academic journals. That was then, and this is
    now.

    Not that is is all going to be resolved quickly. We have entered a several year Beginning of the Counter-REvolution. The Lib-Rad-Jewish propaganda is playing defense now.

    Joe Webb

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  29. Rich says:
    @crimson2

    People wanting to live among their own kind, preserving their towns and cities and schools and cultures is wrong?

    • Replies: @WhiteWolf
    , @ben tillman
  30. peterAUS says:
    @joe webb

    A few days ago, I comnmented on the current Derbyshire article and uttered some discouraging words about the coming US Civil War, part 2. This comment was not permitted, either by Derb or an Unz moderator. Too discouraging I guess, or , too hopeful, or too realistic, in that I suggested that the Kavanaugh Hearings would be commemorated as the official Beginning of the next US civil war.

    My bold above.

    Really? Hahaha………
    Interesting. Sort of.

    Could you please try to repost that comment. Edit out, say, “mod uncomfortable”, elements. “PG-13″ the thing. Wrap it as a “crisis management exercise”.Whatever.

    Those interested in the topic will get it.
    The rest isn’t important.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  31. Anyone who begins or began to understand jewish power in this world can see it almost anywhere.
    Not just in the USA, also in France, Germany, Britain, the Netherlands, in the EU.
    The Guardian was one of the few independent and objective newspapers.
    When Soros bought it, do not know, but I suppose before 2015.
    At present Soros is accused of having in his pocket 226 or 230 European parliament members.
    Hungary, as Russia, threw Soros and his Open Society movement out, Polish socialists call the Soros followers ‘Sorosjugend’.
    At present the EU began legal proceedings against Hungary because it refuses Muslim immigrants.
    Those with a pessimistic, realistic, view on European cultures fear that just in the E European countries, the so called Visigrad countries, Hungary, Poland, etc., European culture will survive.
    Not a few suspect that the effort to destabilise the Middle East, accomplished to a large extent, also has as goal to destabilise the European cultures.

  32. Subversion of entire societies is evil. The hatred that underlies a century of parasitism and destruction is palpable.
    I see little effort amongst Jews to renounce any of it. Even Unz, who catalogues Jewish sin, makes no apology.
    I say again: vermin.
    Further: get ready for 1492. Isabella and Ferdinand will re-appear.

  33. @Miggle

    Define “average Jew”?

    • Replies: @Miggle
  34. Anon[277] • Disclaimer says:
    @conatus

    It seems predictable that you would take interest in a book such as Riesmann’s The Lonely Crowd.
    Consider his foresight in light of the book’s publication time.
    (Social media is amplifying what he foresaw then by a large factor. Females especially live their entire psychological lives like on a mass-followed TV “reality show”.
    Reality shows were discounted as unlikely representations of real life. What a surprise then, that life is actively modelling itself after reality shows, with supposed imitation and original swapping roles!)

  35. peterAUS says:
    @peterAUS

    Actually….don’t do it. No need.

    I should’ve done my homework. Didn’t. A mistake.
    In my defense, again a bout of hectic work activity.

    I guess I got what got “lost”, from one of your posts here:

    They will outlaw hate speech, like Europe has done.

    You mean they’ll enforce hate speech laws, not outlaw them, I guess.

    They will outlaw guns.

    I see.

    If they come for your guns, prepare to die for your freedoms, especially if you are old.

    Now….I was going to comment this, but…nahh….
    As for you, personally, you know, I’d speak with a friend or two. A long, honest chat. Could help.

    The last, but not the least:

    The Democrat Party is basically a terrorist organization. Accept this, think about it.

    Ah, well.
    Take care. Seriously.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  36. @crimson2

    Crimson2 and Tyrion both turn this otherwise magnificent site into the Jewish Defense League. Every comment drips with sarcastic ennui, and one can predict most every word a month in advance.

    We get it. You hate White Nationalists. Why not just pluck a bunch of oppressed black people (e.g. Ruby Bridges) out of obscure history books and string together your next 15 comments attacking wipipo? Seems like it’d require less effort and accomplish the same thing, i.e. exactly nothing.

    P.S. I’m a mostly-lurker … any way I can mute this pair of apologists?

    • Replies: @Thim
    , @Haxo Angmark
    , @crimson2
  37. Rich says:
    @crimson2

    Is that really how you see it? I’m sure you’re aware that it was White people who freed the slaves, White people who gave them the right to vote, White people who’ve fed, clothed and housed them for time immemorial. When does it end? Should someone who never owned a slave, never discriminated” against anyone, be punished for the “sins” of a tiny minority of folks,who owned slaves or “discriminated against someone a hundred or more years ago? Just because they had the same color skin? Spend a couple of weeks in a colored neighborhood and see if you aren’t mistreated, called names, robbed or beaten. It ain’t 1859 anymore. Wake up!

    • Replies: @crimson2
  38. wayfarer says:
    @mark green

    Zionism’s pampered progeny, a coddled silver-spoon fed aristocratic class within humanity, trust-fund children and affluent pan-handlers, “god’s” self-serving souls, forever nurtured to take and never give.

    source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blue_Boy

    • Replies: @Anon
  39. bj says:

    Andrew Joyce is an honest historian and a decent man. For those new to the JQ and those who prefer verbal learning I highly recommend this three hour interview with Andrew Joyce.

    Andrew Joyce The History of Jewish Influence

  40. Thim says:
    @Nancy Pelosi's Latina Maid

    Hit “agree/disagree” then hit “ignore commenter” .

  41. @utu

    Yours is the third attack on Steve Sailer today implying that he runs some kind of interference for Jews. Whether that’s true or not, or intended or not, the focus on IQ is not really an advantage for Jews.

    You see, most everyone who reads here or reads anything similar or has any interest in these subjects has above average IQ. Simply put, the gentiles in our circle are smarter than most Jews as well as most gentiles.

    Most Jews are pretty dense, just as most other people are. There is no question that they are overrepresented for their numbers of smart people, and smart gentiles are underrepresented. It IS tribal and nepotistic, and smart goyim understand that.

  42. Josecanuc says:
    @Anon

    
    “The whole religious complexion of the modern (Western) world is due to the absence from Jerusalem of a lunatic asylum.” Havelock Ellis

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  43. a couple personal asides on the Jewish infestation and take-over of academia, mass media, and the gubmint schools, all with a view to brainwashing the Whites into accepting the destruction of their own race, nation, and culture-civilization:

    during the late b1960′s, as an undergrad @ UC Berkeley I worked at the Survey Research Center for poli sci Professor Herbert McClosky, a shabbatz goy whose thing was learned essays on the “misogyny of conservatives” and the like. His 2 controllers/helpmates were a couple of Assistant Profs, (((Paul Sniderman))) and (((Jack Citrin))). Sniderman’s wife, a Jewess, was an MD busy helping the Reds win in Vietnam by bringing “napalm burned children” to America and oh-so-publicly treating them.

    during the 1970′s-80′s, as a bike messenger in Manhatten, I observed close-up the (((Red’s))) Long March Through the Institutions, particularly as re the Madison Ave. ad agencies – which were completely networked by Reds and faggots during those years – and the 2 National Teachers’ Unions, both HQ’d on Park Avenue South, 400 block. On one occasion, when no one was at the front desk to sign for a package, I wandered into an empty conference room…the walls were festooned with posters of communist luminaries: (((Marx))), Lenin, (((Bronstein-Trotsky))), (((Castro))), Guavara, Ho Chi-minh, everyone but Stalin.

  44. @Nancy Pelosi's Latina Maid

    I don’t want the Jews and their shabbatz goyim muted;

    not yet anyway. Because

    information is power.

  45. crimson2 says:
    @Rich

    I’m sure you’re aware that it was White people who freed the slaves

    And white people fought against freeing the slaves, then enacted Jim Crow for a hundred years. Kind of a mixed record there.

    Should someone who never owned a slave, never discriminated” against anyone, be punished for the “sins” of a tiny minority of folks,who owned slaves or “discriminated against someone a hundred or more years ago?

    No. And no one is being punished.

    Spend a couple of weeks in a colored neighborhood and see if you aren’t mistreated, called names, robbed or beaten.

    My high school was 75% black. I had no issues.

  46. crimson2 says:
    @Nancy Pelosi's Latina Maid

    Yeah, of course. I get it. You’re mad at life and it’s all black people’s fault. And Jews. Sure.

    Why not just pluck a bunch of oppressed black people (e.g. Ruby Bridges) out of obscure history books

    You know Ruby Bridges is still alive, right? That ain’t ancient history. Especially when your little movement would love to bring those days back again.

  47. @crimson2

    Go kill some Palestinians or rape some kids bagel-boy.
    Jews have a long history of fucking anyone and everything for $ or power or practice ; Hence the constant evictions.
    Another big one is coming. Go pack hymen.

    • Replies: @crimson2
  48. Miggle says:
    @Jim Bob Lassiter

    The Jew capacity for hatred and murderous destruction is unparalleled.

    They are vermin.

    Can you say that about the average Jew?

    Define “average Jew”?

    Tinker, tailor, soldier, sailor, rich man, poor man, beggarman, thief.

    Is it individuals, or Judaism itself, the rituals, that keeps the individuals caged? Makes them “strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel”? (Matt. 23:25)

    Alas for you, scribes and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over sea and land to make a single proselyte, and when you have him you make him twice as fit for hell as you are.

    (Matt. 23:15)

    They may be fit only for hell, but whose fault is it?

    Who are the vermin, the snakes, the vipers? (Matt. 23:33) Individual Jews, or the system that controls them, the cage?

    • Replies: @Anon
  49. Rich says:
    @crimson2

    The overwhelming majority of Whites who fought for the Confederacy were fighting for their States, didn’t own slaves, and were probably having difficult financial problems competing with wealthy plantation owners who used slave labor.

    Jim Crow laws existed not to punish blacks, but to protect Whites from black criminality. Look what happened to the cities in the US once segregation ended.

    Affirmative Action denies better qualified Whites school admissions and job opportunities, I’d call that punishment, besides the loss of the right to live and do business with anyone you wish.

    You are the first individual I have ever heard claim to have gone to a majority black school and “have no issues”. The first. And I’ve known a lot, I grew up in NYC. In fact, the black guys I know who went to majority black schools tell me they had “issues”. Are you by any chance lying? Or delusional?

    • Replies: @crimson2
  50. @utu

    So you can probably explain to me how the consensus on Ashkenazi IQ amongst the h-b crowd went from about 115 average 20 years ago to maybe 110 five or more years ago?

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
  51. Anon[362] • Disclaimer says:
    @Miggle

    And is the cage you have in mind one that they should be condemned for? It is, in a peaceful country I suppose you would agree a matter of belonging to what they are likely to call “The Community” which may well extend to going irregularly to the synagogue and not really believing in God. If it arose out of their forebears coming to a country where by religion and language they were not part of existing desirable, influential, communities and where there could still be detected some of the antagonism experienced in virulent form in the countries they left is it in the least surprising or reprehensible that they maintain some community solidarity as a comforting backstop or just to fulfill some natural urge to belong somewhere and to have an extended family or clan? Is it different from the Irish or the Brits in the old Empire?

  52. @Jeff Stryker

    @ Jeff Stryker,

    The answer is way more complex than the few words I’ve to say about it. Let me try to condense the answer [or as I see it].

    The stronger a feeling of ‘us’ versus ‘them’ itself is, the least ‘them’ will have an influence on ‘us.’

  53. phil says:
    @crimson2

    As someone who went head-t0-head for years against activist Jews on one of the country’s most radical campuses, I can tell you that the desire to destroy capitalism was real. The “red-diaper babies,” were, of course, the children–literally or figuratively–of communist sympathizers and outright spies in the US and their Judeo-Bolshevist allies in the USSR. There were many true believers. On the other hand, Stalin’s anti-semitism and the 1967 Six Day War helped to turn the tide, and the general tilt became a mixture of Zionism, Social Democracy, and Cultural Marxism. Some Jews frankly renounced Zionism as racist, but these Jews do not have a dominant voice in Washington, DC; Hillary Clinton used to ally with them but has since caved in to Haim Saban and the big money guys.

    With the abandonment of the working-class by the Democratic Party under the Obama Administration and Hillary Clinton’s campaign, it is fair to say that Jewish elites have become outright plutocrats; they intend to live with both social programs and crony capitalism. They are absolutely filthy rich and arrogate unto themselves the right to censor others and give a Middle Finger to Middle America.

    Yes, some of my best friends are Jews.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  54. Anonymous[398] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Two working parents means the TV raises these kids. Jews and Asians are still allowed to have cultural values.

    Much of your post is a sweeping generalization, I know Jewish trannies and obese Jews who have fallen for a Jewish propaganda. There are Jews who’s hearts bleed for Palestine.

    The idea behind the Michael Kaydar hoax calls was to keep Jews from assimilating too much.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  55. @Daniel Rich

    Hollywood has portrayed Jews negatively. If you watch a film like DIRTY DANCING (The Jews are all played by non-Jews for the most part) the Jewish stereotypes are there. Woody Allen is a self-hating Jew who has spent his entire life portraying Jews as weird perverts…which is of course what he is in real life.

    But it does not affect the Jewish sense of self.

    Jews see a bunch of performers acting out a glorified stage-play written by some cocaine addict in Sherman Oaks.

    Exactly why Gentiles see Eminem and want to emulate him and “Beastie Boy” becomes a slur among Jews themselves for a Jewish whigger is a good question.

    THEY portray THEM negatively more often than not. But Jews are really indifferent to the mass media themselves.

  56. @Daniel Rich

    The Anglo-American always celebrates the individualistic loner with the brooding elitist personality-Eastwood, Burt Reynolds.

    This was not Jews but the very basic motivating factor for Brits to emigrate to the United States in the first place.

    This “Freedom” seems to ingrained in the Anglo Protestant psyche.

    It is not just the Jews but the Irish-Catholics, Italians, Arabs, South Asians etc. who have an in-group strategy that the Anglo-Protestant does not share.

    • Replies: @Daniel Rich
  57. @crimson2

    You definitely were not from the Rust Belt if this is the case.

  58. @peterAUS

    PETER-

    Talk to your aboriginals down in Tasmania about gun violence…oh, you can’t. You shot them all like dogs.

    It was too late for entire race in Australia to enact gun control since white trash thugs from London slums ran around like joyous school shooters.

  59. @Sic Semper

    I grew up in Ann Arbor and Jews do not run around scratching crosses into cars. Even if the neighborhood is mostly Jewish.

    That is a load of rubbish.

    Jews DON’T CARE about Gentiles, for the most part. They take their own upper middle-class position in US society for granted.

    I’m not Jewish at all but my neighborhood was and there were a few thuggish Jews but they did not focus on non-Jews.

  60. Anon[362] • Disclaimer says:
    @wayfarer

    There’s something missing. Like a connection between what you wrote and your alleged “source”. What is the error?

  61. Has anyone really read through this whole piece, or just skimmed it? (like I did) Samuel H. Flowerman was new to me so I did gather some useful piece of information as someone who’s already aware of the JQ, but I fail to see how any fence-sitter wouldn’t just drown in the details of a 6,000 word academic paper and get too bored before the middle of it to get any lasting impression. Someone should condense TOO articles into 1,500-2,000 pieces, holding to the conclusion, and the most relevant references for academic legitimacy.

    Hell, feel free to tweet the above to K-Mac

  62. @Anonymous

    So white working class people are either promiscuous or choose to marry young and have kids at age 20 (This is especially true of Evangelical Protestants).

    Asians and Jews somehow, someway, manage to get into university and devote the ages between 18 and 25 to academia.

    By the time they do marry and start a family they are 30 years old and well into a high 5 or even 6 figure job.

    The court does not have chase them for child support. Their marriages do not break down because you are a different person at 30 then you were in high school. You are done riding the “cock carousel” and your experimentation with pot or other drugs finished at 25.

    So another words it is about having an IQ of 115 on average and low-time preference.

    As a result the Asians-who don’t give a shit about shepherds or Moses-cannot be led around like cows with rings through their nose because they only came to the US for materialistic reasons and manage to get the qualifications for high paying jobs.w

  63. @phil

    PHIL

    I grew up around the U of M and the difference is that in the 70′s those Jews simply accepted that Vietnam was over, cut their hair and got jobs on Wall Street like Abbie Hoffman.

    The leftover hippies in the eighties who were then in the forties and had once been fairly bright young people with a future but took too many hits of LSD and ended up looking like Charles Manson were not Jews.

    One day the Jews decided the sixties were over.

  64. @Jeff Stryker

    @ Jeff Stryker,

    In the early days on TV and in movies, Native Americans were alway burning down stuff [for no apparent reason, mind you].

    That’s Eastern European pogroms [penned down and filmed by Eastern European Jewish writers and directors] inserted in the minds of the gullible goy.

    If it’s true what you say [the Irish-Catholics, Italians, Arabs, South Asians etc. who have an in-group strategy that the Anglo-Protestant does not share.], they’re heading toward extinction.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  65. Moi says:
    @Anon834

    That has been my experience too.

  66. …And a Polish Catholic named Charles Bronson hired a bunch of young Jewish actors to play muggers in DEATH WISH and ST. IVES. According to old Chucky B, Jewish thugs were stalking every alley and subway and their first target would be some tough-as-hell looking Polish ex-miner who looked like he would be carrying a gun.

    Scorsese portrayed Jews as street pimps.

    Woody Allen portrayed Jews as nerdy perverts. Himself, essentially.

    There is no ban on Jewish people watch Sarah Silverman or Ron Jeremy. When they turn on their television there is no warning that says “Jews are not allowed to watch this as it will degrade their morals.”

    Andrew Dice Clay’s albums did not have Jewish warnings on them. “Warning my fellow Jews, this material is for non-Jews”.

    Asians have been subject to negative depictions. It has not necessarily affected them.

    So why Asians and Jews are allowed to have cultural values and WASPS aren’t is a good question.

  67. @Daniel Rich

    [Too many mostly vacuous comments. Switch to substantive comments if you want them published.]

  68. @Jeff Stryker

    So your “argument” — if one can be dredged up from somewhere in the murky depths of that fetid stew of ignorance, pilpul, sophistry, rank anti-White hatred, and toxic semitism that you call a post — is that, because the jew possesses (partial) immunity to his own poison, his victims have no right to stop the production or spread of that poison. That the jew has some sort of “human right” to continue his destructive ways unchecked. That the disease is somehow the “fault” of the host, not the parasite, so the host is somehow obligated to “tolerate” the parasite, rather than treat the disease.

    No, Chaim.
    Go tikkun someone else’s olam. Poison someone else’s well.
    We don’t want any.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @Josecanuc
  69. crimson2 says:
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    Another big one is coming. Go pack hymen.

    It isn’t. Nobody likes you guys.

    • Replies: @Anon
  70. crimson2 says:
    @Rich

    You are the first individual I have ever heard claim to have gone to a majority black school and “have no issues”. The first. And I’ve known a lot, I grew up in NYC. In fact, the black guys I know who went to majority black schools tell me they had “issues”. Are you by any chance lying? Or delusional?

    It doesn’t surprise me that you don’t believe me. You guys live in a bubble of racist thought and you pay way more attention to things that go bad than things that go right. Also I would think that racists would have a bit more trouble with black people in school than non-racists.

    • Replies: @Rich
    , @Anon
  71. @James Forrestal

    The fact that Jews got blue-collar whites to blow their heads off to Judas Priest in 1980′s because they thought he was tough and the guy came out as a flamboyant gay makes a mockery of white susceptibility to the media doesn’t it?

    Sort of like how all those penniless aging hippies must have felt when Abbie Hoffman turned around and became a Wall Street stockbroker.

  72. Josecanuc says:
    @James Forrestal

    
    “No, Chaim. Go tikkun someone else’s olam. “Poison someone else’s well”

    Thank you….this is one beautiful almost poetic line….so graceful … harmonious, aesthetic enough to be the beginning and the ending lyric of a Simon Garfunkel tune titled
    “Go Tikkum some ele’s olam….”

    Daniel Coleman in Vital Lies, Simple Truths The Psychology of Self Deception explains some people’s habit of turning the attention away from certain unpleasant facts by replacing it with another subject hoping to draw their attention away from their own guilt:

    “My subject is how people notice and how they do not notice certain aspects, parts of reality. A ‘blind spot’ is an apt physiological metaphor for our failure to see things as they are in actuality…how people “contrive to ignore the implication of the information they allow to get through – or information that they were somehow weren’t able to prevent from getting out.”

    “If the force of facts is too brutal (truthful) to ignore, then their implication can be altered. The collusion is maintained by directing attention away from the fearsome facts…the anxiety is appeased by a twist of attention….by changing the discussion and referring to other factors plays a big part in minimizing what is actually occurring: other factors are employed to sidetrack or hide what is really going on.”

    “To let ourselves be guided by blind spots in consciousness, one twisted by the need to avoid truths, is to increase the rate of our acceleration toward disaster.”

    “Truths must be told if we are to find our way out. Indeed, the clear and strong voices of the lucid among us may be our last and best hope. We cannot let caution paralyze action, stay us from seeing and saying things just as they are. We need guidance that flows from insight; insight is curative.”

    (Sunshine cleanses…” Zionist U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis )

    Coleman again: “Therapists have held out the promise that a cure lay in self-disclosure ….here lies the break through the cocoons of silence that keep vital truths from the collective awareness. It is the courage to seek the truth and to speak it that can save us from the narcotic of self-deception. And each of us has access to some bit of truth that needs to be spoken.”

    Thomas Wolfe, The Web and the Rock, 1939: “And the whole secret, power, and knowledge of their own lie is locked within them – they know it and feel it; they have the whole thing in them.”

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  73. Rich says:
    @crimson2

    It doesn’t surprise me that it doesn’t surprise you that I don’t believe you. With your nonsensical, unbelievable tales of going to a school that was 75% black and seeing no racial problems you’re probably used to not being believed. Please tell us where this unicorn school is so we can show it to the rest of the world and learn from it’s example.

    I suppose we all live in “bubbles”, my bubble is NYC where I grew up and work. It’s a pretty big bubble.

    • Replies: @crimson2
  74. Crimson2 went to utopia high. Other Demonrats envy him.

    • Replies: @crimson2
  75. @Josecanuc

    Simon Garfunkel was the Jew that spearheaded the sixties rebellion and anti-tradition with Dustin Hoffman in THE GRADUATE!

    He brought on the hippie era and anti-establishment that morphed into liberalism and drugs and free love single-handedly with Mrs. Robinson.

    And you quote him.

  76. crimson2 says:
    @Rich

    I guess I’ll just have to live with the fact that some lonely pathetic racist doens’t believe me.

    • Replies: @Rich
  77. crimson2 says:
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    Crimson2 went to utopia high. Other Demonrats envy him.

    Just for that I’m going to tell my Jewish overlords to make sure your daughter gets a REALLY black dick. :)

  78. Rich says:
    @crimson2

    Obviously, you won’t name this 75% black school that has no “issues”, but that’s because it exists only in your “enlightened ” mind. That’s ok, some folks need fantasies to get through the day and I wouldn’t want to cause you to have a breakdown by facing reality.

    On a side note, it’s kind of funny how you “enlightened ” folks constantly yell and write the word “racist “, almost like some primitive tribesmen shouting a curse to ward off evil. Amusing.

  79. Anon[332] • Disclaimer says:
    @crimson2

    LOL… even Black people have trouble with Black people in school. See Black schools. This is a universal experience.

    The core of all politics is racism. Blacks know this as well as everyone else. We’re well past the point where calling someone a racist has any meaning or influence. It certainly isn’t a valid argument.

    Though, how you utilize the term is for a sophomoric and ineffective shame tactic. It should be instructive for you that not even your rhetorical motivations are valid, let alone your arguments.

    • Replies: @FLgeezer
  80. Anon[441] • Disclaimer says:
    @crimson2

    Everyone likes White people. Few like Black people, even those that say that they do (as evidenced by their Black avoidant lifestyle choices).

    In general, even our trailer trash is of better quality than your best (who, lets be honest, mostly equate to those who are lucky to have earned money). The Cosby Show was your new archetypal black cultural-behavioral ideal, until a spiteful and jealous nigger (and really, a true nigger) decided to spark a #metoo campaign to cut him down to size. After all, you can’t have no uppity niggers in the group thinkin they all high an mighty an shiite with their values lectures. Amirite?

    • Replies: @crimson2
  81. Anon[366] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    It begs the question. Why does this affect non-Jews but not Jews themselves?

    Mexicans have gotten blacks and rednecks hooked on every new drug they pumped into North America-cocaine in the 80′s, then meth, now heroin.

    But Jews have largely been affected by this.

    Asian-Americans are not overly-affected either.

    So we have to ask ourselves WHY the Anglo-Saxon is so affected by the mass media or popular culture. Why they don’t seem to have the cultural anchor that Jews or Asians do.

    All great points, with a helpful final guiding comment at the end. Thank you.

    Challenge accepted. Lets travel back to when Anglo Saxons, to whom you directed us, had their native culture.

    That time was directly before the Frankish-Roman Charlemagne decided to genocide them until they accepted Semitic-Greek Christianity.

    They fought bravely, but in the end were converted by the blade that also cut down their sacred pillar that was the symbol of their never-moving law.

    Semitic Christianity was born of the Roman Baachus cult, which in turn was born of the Jewish-Greek Sabazius / Dionysus cults.

    These gods can be traced to Adonis or “Adonai”. The Romans executed 7000 Baachic cult members and kicked out the Jews in an attempt to stymie the spread of the engineered cultural poison, but ultimately failed.

    As it is today, the poison was engineered to target several soft points at once (class gripes, lower education, human impulse, immigrant political self-interest, etc) and thus proved too overwhelming for the Roman State or people to counter in the long run.

    Before the (Jewish communist) cultural revolution in China, Asia had never been exposed to such an effective genocidal campaign toward eradicating their culture.

    Even still, the Chinese cultural revolution had a large yet limited effect due to the sheer size of China and greater Asia, and the Chinese and broader Asian culture(s) survived. At the time that this poison was used against the Europeans, the tribal populations were much smaller.

    Jewish culture was designed specifically to work and survive alongside the Christian-Dionysian-Communist cultural weapon.

    It even maintains its own version of such in non-Orthodox Judaism, all the while this outer liberal shell still idiosyncratically fights for Jewish racial rights like its some mutant quasi-liberal reincarnation of the National Socialist Germans (but of course much older and more practiced / sophisticated). This is because it was designed to work hand in-glove.

    Older European culture was not ready for what destroyed it, in terms of either raw physical defensive power, political defensive power, or population numbers.

    What does that mean? Does that mean that a people who spent perhaps tens of thousands of millenia isolated and surviving in the frozen steppe / Arctic regions are weaker than the people who spent the same time relaxing in the warm levant and perfecting their political machinations while outbreeding with the local Neanderthals?

    If modern human achievement is accounted for, maybe not.

    Does it mean that they should accept this political weakness, enforced by the cultural eradication of 2000 years ago, and merely accept a measure of inferiority?

    Someone who insists on playing a rigged game, and then appealing to the “rules” when they are under threat might argue that point.

    I would argue that there is a much simpler solution, which is to acknowledge the problem and physically get rid of it. A sociopolitially rigged game is not a valid game. We can effectively physically isolate the hyper-aggressive party, by which we would temporarily solve for much of the political weakness and allow us to begin the long, slow process of patching it.

    Stryker, your question in regard to sociopolitical vulnerability begs a set of legal rules for it to have any validity. It assumes that all groups, no matter how oppressed, will agree to maintaining this heavily engineered and adharmic brand of civilization (even under severe cultural oppression). It is essentially to say “look at this game that we have constructed around you, do you see how weak and vulnerable you are to it? Accept your inferiority (while forgetting how we actively hobbled you 1-2 millenia ago)”.

    That’s fine. However, what you are apparently making an active effort to ignore is that we can and will eventually turn your game-board over. When that effort comes from within all Western nations, instead of just from within two, you are going to have a larger problem on your hands.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  82. crimson2 says:
    @Anon

    The oxy epidemic rears its ugly head at unz. Keep the NARCAN® handy, Jethro.

    • Replies: @Anon
  83. @crimson2

    Leave other people’s children out of political discussions faggot.
    On the day of the rope you’ll be crying and wailing with your zhid overlords just like 1492.

    • Replies: @crimson2
  84. @crimson2

    Your doubters don’t seem to have noticed that you only said “I had no issues”. I can imagine the kind of school because a successful lawyer friend of mine went to a poor suburb’s high school from which very few went to university. But in year 12 he was one of a small number of talented students whom some good teachers were pleased to treat as special and give appropriate attention to. I am not aware of what streaming may have taken place in earlier years but I daresay there was at least informal Advanced Placement. Was that how it was at your school?

    • Replies: @crimson2
  85. @Daniel Rich

    Excellent question and very good short answer, both very stimulating. I would add : most Jews are aware (partly or fully) that the mass culture is “bad for the Goyim”, and that it is “Good for the Jews” to let the Goyim sink in it and don’t try to pull them out of it (the old talmudian ethics). Many Jews are even fully aware that this mass poisonning is done by Jews.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  86. @Laurent Guyénot

    “Don’t try to pull them out of it”

    What are Jews, the parents of Gentiles? How would they pull them out of it?

    I know a load of Jewish feminists went after Jewish porn czars.

  87. anonymous[107] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Their [Jewish female] out-of-wedlock birth rate has not risen. You don’t see many Jewish pregnant girls down at the country welfare office.

    Forty + years ago I was hired onto a Jewish household/business staff. I was a naive kid, wet behind the ears. The absolute first thing the head of staff told me was about taking Jewish girls to get abortions.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  88. Tod says:

    I’ve recently read “The selfish gene” and “The extended phenotype” of Prof. Dawkings, which I highly recommend as books that really change one’s view on life. There’s a chapter in the second book detailing how parasites are often better adapted than their hosts, sometimes in truly hilarious ways.

    Like there’s a species of cuckoo (for those who don’t know cuckoos deposit their eggs in other species nest) who’s kids are way bigger than the hosts kids, and even bigger than the adult host. It is really mind bogging, intellectually speaking, that the host bird is not able to defend against the treachery. I mean, the parent literally stands on the parasite kid’s head to feed it…

    Long story short, this only works, evolutionary, if the instances in which this happens are very few. So the parasite is adapted to the fullest, and the host is barely adapted at all, because the few instances of host getting tricked are not really significant for the whole population.

    If the parasites get to high enough number, relating to the host population, one of these things could happen (please forgive me if I’m totally wrong, as I am no evolutionary scientist):
    1) The host species disappears, and the parasite too, unless he can quickly adapt to another host
    2) The host species adapts and the parasite must further adapt, and if it cannot it will disappear. (In any way the parasite population will probably decrease to go to 3)
    3) The ongoing struggle is: Host adapts, parasite adapts, but the ratio will most likely remain the same, as there are only a few viable host to parasite ratios i.e. parasites are few compared to the host.

    What’s really interesting about this story is that it doesn’t imply any kind of superiority of the parasite, over the host. Not intellectual, not physical, not anything. In fact, in the biological example the parasite, and the host, have very limited intelligence altogether. Basically intelligence doesn’t even come into the equation.

    What I’m trying to say, is that some cultures follow the biological aspect of parasitic life, in similar ways. Although they may seem smarter than the host, is also possible they are not. Although their actions may seem planed, and devious, and cunning, they may be not. There may just be some simple rules that each individual follows without even realizing the parasitic aspect of it. Truly the cuckoo doesn’t need any particular hatred for the host to do what he does… he may even not know he’s doing any harm. This of course doesn’t mean that birds must not beware…

  89. @anonymous

    A Jew once told me that the reason so many Jewish women become porn stars is a strong sex drive.

    But how many end up on welfare?

    And some slut like Silverman who is riding the cock carousel does the kid a favor.

  90. Skeptikal says:
    @Agent76

    Interesting and worthwhile film
    It is too bad that the narrator has poor diction and swallows a large portion of his consonants.
    Many words go missing.

  91. Macs says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Jews are susceptible to propaganda, many of them are used as pawns by elites too. However, they are not the targets of the propaganda so it doesn’t have the same degree of harm to them. Indeed, the overarching strategy is only to destroy Whites, they assume that the resulting competition against other races will be easy. This may be racism or it could be knowledge of educational stats, either way the same technique worked on the Russian intelligencia so why not use it again?

  92. FLgeezer says:
    @Anon

    >LOL… even Black people have trouble with Black people in school. See Black schools. This is a universal experience.

    Assertion confirmed in another of an unbroken string of “universal experiences”:

    http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/education/palm-beach/fl-ne-boynton-school-principal-investigation-20181001-story.html

  93. WhiteWolf says:
    @Rich

    Only if you’re White. There can be no White countries. There can be no White cities or even communities. If they are allowed to exist then eventually 6 mllion Jews will be gassed to death and turned into lampshades and soap. Please don’t have such forbidden thoughts again.

  94. crimson2 says:
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    Leave other people’s children out of political discussions faggot.
    On the day of the rope you’ll be crying and wailing with your zhid overlords just like 1492.

    There will be no “day of the rope” you impotent inbred fuck. You’ll kill yourself with opioids before long, and no one will give a shit, especially not your mixed-race grandkids.

    lol :)

  95. crimson2 says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Pretty much. My district had several schools called “optional” schools. The optional track was more advanced academically and students were allowed to transfer in, which is what I did. This was urban, though, not suburban.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  96. geokat62 says:
    @crimson2

    … especially not your mixed-race grandkids.

    You say that like it’s a bad thing.

    You don’t mean to suggest that Diversity Isn’t Really Our Strength, do you? I ask, because The Lobby has reassured us Dumb Goyim that it is.

  97. @crimson2

    And then who would support your hyper-sexual reproductive lifestyle?

    Even in famine you end up having five kids.

    The Savannah tribal sex rhythms don’t fit into a society designed for a nuclear family structure.

    I suppose when the Hispanics assume the reins you’ll end up in a favela situation like Brazil. Loads of orphans running around the streets without even money for shoes.

  98. @crimson2

    On impotence.

    Possibly true but you can never stop having five kids.

    If you look at the kids of famous black like Ali or Pryor they end up poor because there 6 or 8 or 10 of them.

  99. @crimson2

    And that 75 per cent black? Was that on your optional campus? Or was the optional school effectively part of a single campus?

  100. So to counter authoritarianism, it is necessary to become authoritarian… got it.

  101. Anon[381] • Disclaimer says:
    @crimson2

    I’m actually 100% sober (I find alcohol and drugs to be boring and uhealthy), and am employed in a middle-class licensed, white-collar profession that has very few blacks.

    I can also read and correctly interpret the White man’s scripture; which would tell you all that you would need to know and that you don’t seem to.

    After all, except for this peak time that scripture also told you was coming, our scripture has been the overt central pillar of our civilization for over two thousand years. The time period that it speaks to is much longer. Your downfall is that you can’t interpret it, and that defect is making you uppity. We’ve been trying to teach it to you for hundreds of years now. It really hasn’t taken.

    Enjoy the present. We’re a long-term time horizon people.

  102. @Jeff Stryker

    Their out-of-wedlock birth rate has not risen. You don’t see many Jewish pregnant girls down at the country welfare office.

    That one’s fairly easy to explain: if you don’t have irrational qualms about flushing an unwanted jelly-bean-sized bunch of genetic material down the toilet, you don’t have unintended offspring. Everyone should have a “Plan B” (and the fewer children people have, the fewer obese fuckheads getting in my way gawping at shiny shit).

    Let’s call balls and strikes. Let’s also assume that Da Doity Joo is behind

    ① the more-widespread re-acceptance of fertility control. Ball One.
    ② the undermining of organised religion (including their own). Ball Two.
    ③ fewer women who endure lifelong abuse by their spouses. Ball Three.
    ④ less acceptance of outright violence towards marginalised folk. Ball Four.

    Batter, take a base.

    On ① alone, those who decide (and decide early, FFS) that they don’t want to continue to grow the genetic shitpile in their womb, can get rid of it. Everybody should rejoice in that fact. (Face it: 95% of all kids actually born are a waste of space; those that are flushed would be worse off born, even if they are not actually inferior).

    ② has dramatically reduced the number of children being buggered by predatory homosexual paedophiles, and has completely destroyed the social ‘cover’ that enabled the systematic institutional cover-up of centuries of same;

    ③ has been (ahem) a mixed blessing; more broken homes (which means broken children), more 40-something women with an axe to grind when they discover that being freed from abuse is not an untrammelled joy. Still, better out (for them) than in.

    ④ Poofs and darkies don’t get bashed or dragged behind trucks, or hanged from trees (yes, all those things were always quite rare – but they can no longer draw a crowd of 15,000 in a county with a population of 20,000).

    Disclosure: Da Joo is not behind those things. What’s behind those things is social evolution – despite often-violent opposition from the political class to literally every social change, marginalised groups have managed to wrestle increased recognition of their rights. Seriously: think of a social change that happened (go all the way back to Abolition) and try to think of a single one that was not fought, tooth and nail, by the political class.
    .

    Let’s also consider the thesis of the piece.

    The notion that some bunch of marginal grifters were the drivers behind social change, is so silly it’s not worth considering.

    These guys were all from marketing and psychology - if there’s two bigger groups of charlatans on the planet, I want to know who they are (don’t’ say “economists” – economics doesn’t even come close). And they’re not the smartest knives in the drawer (smart kids have wider alternatives than to go into either, which is why entry criteria are so low for both ‘disciplines’ [sic]).

    Marketing claims it can make dummies buy more of a specific brand of laundry powder – but if you actually look at data, you have to make all sorts of indefensible assumptions about how to match sales with marketing expenditures (disclosure: I’ve done consulting projects to quantify the effect of advertising on sales… done right, it gives answers that marketing departments don’t like and won’t pay for: advertising is not net-revenue accretive and is undertaken for reasons other than market share and net revenue).

    Psych claims preternatural insight into how folks think – and yet their results are a mish-mash of laughable gibberish that is non-replicable, and if applied results in more harm than good (and less efficacy than placebo). It’s so close to religion that it should be obvious: inconsistent, evidence-free, stream-of-consciousness drivel to which adherents cling like limpets (and which shucks and jives when its assertions are exposed to scrutiny).

    So sticky-tape a bunch of these also-rans together, and what you will have is a set of moderately-talented charlatans who can cobble together a plausible narrative for a long-term grift.

    So that’s what that is: a way for some semi-skilled folks to make a living, selling bullshit to people who think that they’re buying a tool manipulate others (parse that sentence carefully). And a bunch of them were Jewish (or pseudo-Jewish – i.e., not remotely religious, but had ancestors who were).

    .

    Cards on table: I am firmly on board with the idea that ‘real‘ Red Sea Pedestrians (the folks with silly hats who tie boxes to their heads and rock like mental patients) do not like Anglo-Saxons, or Western Whites more generally.

    Their literature abounds with trash talk about us – but also about homos, yon Darkie, and pretty much everyone who’s not a victim of ritual genital mutilation in the name of an invisible Sky Maniac.

    So if you take that literature seriously, you’re gonna have a spitting fit every time you pass a church. Nobody disputes that.

    Key thing about the guys: they’re fucking dumb. Dumber than a bag of rocks. “3 centuries living in a shithole beyond the Pale” dumb. “Maimonides: smart – like a computer!!” dumb. They have the mental sophistication of a 9th century peasant.

    They’re from the place that missed the cognitive bifurcation that happened in Western European Jewry. That cognitive bifurcation – the concentration of smart genes in the rabbinate in the West, is itself is the reason why no Western European rabbi supported Herzl or Weizmann: Zionism had to head so far east to get rabbinical support, that they ended up in Lithuania).

    And there’s fuck-all of them. They have no social power outside of Occupied Palestine (and some crackpot parts of major cities where they have their ghettos – oops, I mean enclaves… no, no, I mean ‘cultural centres‘).

    As for the not-’real’ RSPs (i.e., atheists whose forebears just happened to be Red Sea Pedestrians); they fall into two broad groups ->
    ⓐ Zionists, who claim to care about literally one thing – their clique’s invasion of Palestine and the continuation of their race-cult’s occupation (but if you think they’re actually prepared to live there, you’ve got rocks in your head); and
    ⓑ just normal folks (albeit with some idiotic cultural practices that link to their forebears’ nuttery).

    If I was to hazard an estimate, I would say that ⓑ/ⓐ is about 19 (i.e., Zionists are 5% of non-religious Jews).

    And yes, in the middle there are ‘semi-serious’ Jews – Reform and the like – but they practice a silly New Age pastiche… “Nerf Judaism” with lady rabbis and scriptural revisionism. Those guys are about as much of a threat to Western Civilisation as Low-Church Anglicans.

    In sum: there is no Jewish Cabal that is capable of undermining Western Civilisation; there never has been. To the extent that the weird, bearded, mental-patient-rocking dudes had any intention to try, they were on a hiding to nothing.

    From time to time some charlatan grifter finds a mark who is prepared to pay to have their prejudices confirmed (“We can, by manipulating the information flow that comes of of the TV, make Joe Sixpack love negros, homos and Messicans” – fucking hogwash).

    The evidence is pretty clear: if you want to influence someone’s sincerely-held beliefs, you have until they are about 16 to get your hooks in.

    Cigarette companies, organised religions, and governments know that. They don’t pay grifters a bunch of money to hear stupid shit that won’t work: they just get kiddies to recite a pledge to a piece of coloured cloth every weekday morning for 12 years… job done.

    Or they get ‘em to sing “Jesus Loves Me” (and to ignore the pain in their asshole from the last time the priest asked them to come help him put away the sacraments).

    .

    Starting in about the 17th century, Western society has been in the process of prising itself – little by little – from the grip of two sets of parasites: aristocrats and priests. Initially that was driven by the two “apex parasites” competing for power and undermining each other’s authority. Then it developed its own momentum.

    Unfortunately as part of the process, we substituted politicians for aristocrats. That’s just replacing one set of grifters with another, larger set: the putative justification changed, but its bullshit-content remained the same.

    Religion is fourth-and-long, 2-down-strike-2-bases-loaded, with seconds left in the final chukkha (lol… just thought up that mixed-metaphor): that’s a good thing, and I refuse to let some bunch of marketing and psych charlatans share in the credit – I don’t give a fuck if they’re Kikes, Micks, or Muzzies.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  103. @Wizard of Oz

    So you can probably explain to me how the consensus on Ashkenazi IQ amongst the h-b crowd went from about 115 average 20 years ago to maybe 110 five or more years ago?

    Yep… people started scratching at the surface of the studies that were used to make the initial assertion (115), and discovered that they were as dodgy as fuck.

    Then, the walk-back started.

    So far, it’s at “107-110″; next decade it will be “104-107″.

    And on the other side (“SSAs are only slightly smarter than mongoloids”), that ‘research’ is likewise being exposed to scrutiny and is being found wanting.

    Suddenly people are being made aware of important intra-group differentials (e.g., Yoruba and Igbo immigrant kids outperform ‘African’ (and white) UK kids; there is a full-σ gap between white DC residents and white West Virginians).

    It’s going to turn out that IQ – a useful metric with useful predictive characteristics – will be ‘done in’ by one stupid thing… taking raw scores and forcing them into a normal distribution. Cognitive grunt is not distributed normally – it is far more likely to be bi-modal, as would be expected if there had been several generations of assortative mating where intelligence was an important consideration (even if only indirectly, through its link to income). And since the downside is subsidised (i.e., the welfare system underwrites reproduction by dummies), the outcomes are predictable –
    ⓐ a small (and shrinking) cognitive aristocracy, where smart women correctly identify that it’s better to have a smart partner (and breed less); and
    ⓩ a gigantic Idiocracy-style cognitive wasteland where people fuck to make friends … and whatever happens after that is a matter for the welfare system.

  104. @Kratoklastes

    Good to find an almost neighbour who would provide reliable covering fire as I attacked the PC line with Mills bombs or Molotov cocktails. Interesting though that I could use the 115 figure about 20 years ago to suggest that it made sense of the fact that 50 per cent of American major newspaper editors, heads of film studios etc were Jewish, that being about 17 times their proportion of the population and fitted the idea that 3sds would be about the mark for such achievement. Not ALL BS but the latest IQ estimates make the particular Jewish achievements no less intriguing.

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
  105. peterAUS says:
    @Kratoklastes

    …the outcomes are predictable –
    ⓐ a small (and shrinking) cognitive aristocracy, where smart women correctly identify that it’s better to have a smart partner (and breed less); and
    ⓩ a gigantic Idiocracy-style cognitive wasteland where people fuck to make friends … and whatever happens after that is a matter for the welfare system.

    Interesting.

  106. @Kratoklastes

    1> Widespread use of fertility control.

    Most of the time a singe young woman’s life goes directly into the shitter when some young man gets her pregnant. At best it is altered but most of the time, the young man really wants nothing to do with it.

    In my socio-economic class I am talking about young adult women of 18 or 20. Not teenagers.

    2> This was an Irish-American issue in my youth.

    3> Some women need to get away from a crazed dangerous partner.

    4> Gays getting bashed was still fairly common when I was young in the eighties and nineties.

  107. @Kratoklastes

    IDIOCRACY FALLACY

    When I was teenager and young man in the 90′s out-of-wedlock births were lower because AIDS was a death sentence and killed you within a year or two.

    Condoms came off when you could live with HIV like diabetes.

    Part of this is choice.

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
  108. @Jeff Stryker

    I remember when the HIV/AIDS scare happened – I was in my 20s when the hysteria reached its crescendo with a tax-funded propaganda campaign to pretend that it was genuinely something about which heterosexual men needed to worry. The “Grim Reaper” ads in Australia, for example.

    It was abundantly clear that “heterosexual” HIV was so rare (in the West) that it was likely to actually be bisexual males transmitting it to women who didn’t know that their man was a pillow-biter in the off-season. (And in Africa, most of the diagnoses of HIV were done by checklists rather than blood tests… so I gave them about the same credibility as a psych checklist).

    I have nothing against homosexuals, Haitians, haemopheliacs or IV drug users, but I didn’t (and don’t) belong to any of those groups… and so during the HIV/AIDS hysteria I governed myself accordingly – i.e., I got laid whenever and wherever the opportunity presented itself (and the counterparty met my modest expectations), often on the spur of the moment, and in complete disregard about contraception[1].

    By my early 30s, I had read some of Duesberg’s work, and that of other people who were skeptical about HIV as a cause of AIDS. Duesberg was starting to get traction by the late 90s/early 00s, and a Nobel-winning biochemist (Kary Mullis – Nobel in 1993) had joined the skeptic chorus.

    So by 2003, the Nobel Prize guys had to give Montaigner a ‘belated’ prize in order to still the waters. Worked a treat.

    If Ron Unz really wants “American Pravda” to cause a shit-storm, he should turn his attention to why people like Duesberg took the view they did – at great cost to their previously high-profile careers.

    If anyone thinks that Unz’s tweaking of the ‘Number-6′ schnozzes of Jewry is somewhat foolhardy, they have not ever run afoul of teh gheys (more accurately, the professional grifters at the top of the gay-power movement – I do not call it a gay rights movement because the rights side of things is a done deal, and has been since the 80s).

    If there’s a highly-credentialled, scientifically-trained individual who can’t stop ‘taking on’ the received wisdom, even when doing so causes them career harm… well, it’s possible that you’re dealing with a Snow, a Semmelweiss, a Wegener, or a Gold[2], so you had best look into it as thoroughly as you can: I’ve not encountered anything that counters Duesbrg and Mullis (and others).

    Then again, I never believed that dietary fat (or salt, or cholesteral) caused cardiovascular disease, either. I used to believe the second-hand smoke was bad, then I read the literature and had to abandon that idea (because the quantitative work was appallingly badly-done) even though I’m a lifelong anti-smoker.

    [1] This resulted in a couple of trips to accompany the ‘party of the second part’ to a place dedicated to flushing unwanted jelly-bean sized clumps of genetic material. If pro-lifers are to be believed, there was at least one Jesus, and possibly a Jesus-Einstein (although given my genetic contribution, a Jesus-Hitler-Einstein was possible, so everyone thank their lucky stars).

    [2] Snow: Jon Snow (not the GoT character) determined that the cholera outbreak in London in 1854 was caused by contaminated water: the dominant hypothesis at the time as still that disease was caused by ‘miasma’.

    Semmelweiss: Ignaz Semmelweiss determined that hand-washing reduced puerperal fever by 90% (prior to this, surgeons would go directly from conducting autopsies, to the delivery room… without washing their hands). His work was rejected, he was sacked, he went bonkers, and died in an asylum from an untreated cut on his hand.

    Wegener: Alfred Wegener developed the theory of tectonic plates and continental drift. Was roundly lambasted by geologists at the time.

    Gold: Thomas Gold (d 2004) develop the abiotic hypothesis for oil – i.e., that hydrocarbons are produced deep in the earth’s crust, and rise to the surface (where they are often contaminated with other material). There is persuasive tendency evidence that Gold was right (e.g., that proved reserves of oil keep going up, when “Hubbard’s Peak” was supposed to happen in 2012).

    E pur se muove… I didn’t even mention Galileo, Copernicus, or Bruno.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  109. @Wizard of Oz

    Not ALL BS but the latest IQ estimates make the particular Jewish achievements no less intriguing.

    They’re a bit less intriguing if you consider that powerful Jews pretend to be “all about the Jewness”, and so are able to rely on a significant network effect.

    Let’s leave the Jews out of it for the moment, and examine other networks that have a long and storied history of lending a hand to one of their kind.

    Until relatively recently, Freemasons used to be over-represented in the halls of power – police, military, intelligence services, judiciary, law, politics, bureaucracy – mainly because membership in the Craft gave you access that you could not acquire on merit.

    (Disclosure: I am a Freemason – and a Mark Mason, and a member of the Holy Royal Arch. Odd, for an atheist! Turns out that the definition of GAOTU is fluid… mine’s “The Laws of Physics”, so I could honestly answer “Yes” when asked the appropriate question.)

    Arguably, the Masons were far better at it than the kikes, because the kikes managed to get up everyone’s noses while they did it, whereas the Masons went about it less ostentatiously and were just thought of as a social institution (although they didn’t fool Nasty Uncle Dolfie: he reckoned that Freemasonry was at least as bad as the Red Sea Pedestrians).

    Sometimes, non-meritocratic access works, because it imposes a second layer of discipline: the recipient has every intention of doing their utmost to repay the kindness.

    That’s certainly true when a Mason does a favour for a brother. If you are extended a kindness and you fuck it up (and it’s objectively your fault), you risk being blackballed – in which case the entire network ignores you (at best) or is actively hostile to you (at worst).

    With that in mind…

    Consider a Mason who applies to his bank for a business loan. If the manager is a Mason (and the client identifies himself – by visiting the manager’s Lodge), the odds of approval go up. (It’s considered a bit non-U to use ‘signs and tokens’ in order to work out if the bank manager’s a Mason: visit the nearest Lodge and meet him on the level).

    That means that a Mason can ‘leverage’ his membership in the Craft – he can get larger loans for a given level of project risk.

    Similarly, consider a Mason who wants to get planning permission for a building project, or wants a piece of land re-zoned in order to build houses on it. If the local mayor (or planning officer) is a Mason, the odds improve.

    That explains it all – there is no requirement for higher IQ, higher levels of education, or higher levels of entrepreneurial skill. It’s just the difference between ‘networks’ and ‘normal schlubs’.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  110. AL PACINO’S CRUISING & AN HONEST LOOK AT GAY LIFE

    The Al Pacino film was a pretty honest insight into gay life before PC. The Dahmer-type serial killers lurking in poppers-fueled gay clubs, the violent spats, the drugs, the sheer promiscuity.

    Males who get AIDS from women do so the same way as gays-through promiscuous buggery-this is why once every few years male porn stars who specialize in “Double Anal Creampies” contract it from some debauched porn queen.

    In terms of black HIV, some evidence indicates West Africans developed some sort of resistance to malaria which makes them more susceptible to certain blood-borne pathogens.

  111. peterAUS says:
    @Kratoklastes

    Good post.

    I’ve not encountered anything that counters Duesbrg and Mullis (and others).

    Same. Found that, at the time, interesting.

    My take:
    Power is everything. All the rest come from it.

    Truth, scientific or not, is just one of tools to get, or retain, it.
    That’s for “up” of social ladder.

    And, there is more: people demand truth. Or, at least, a version of it which takes their fears away.
    That’s for “down” of social ladder.

    Eternal.

  112. @Kratoklastes

    Persuasive, and also interesting. It was suggested to me that I join the Masons for its networking advantages many years ago but I wasn’t conscious of knowing many Masons (though a much older man with whom I shared a boss was referred to laughingly by said boss’s driver as Grand Dog of the Masons) and never did anything about it. Which leaves me to ask you if there was much if any overlap of Jews and Masons.

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
  113. @Kratoklastes

    This seems an opportune time for me to ask about another IQ related question that I cannot resolve satisfactorily. That is why the Flynn Effect shows up more reliably (or only) on so-called culture fair tests like Raven’s matrices rather than on verbal and numerical and logical tests which are designed to be g laden.

    I rarely see anti-IQers attacking the actual testing but I suspect that there is considerable underestimation of the possibilities of training or practising for the tests and, in relation to those dubious African averages of 70 or Australian Aborigines 60 lack of allowance for what might broadly be called cultural and environmental factors. It occurs to me that it is less possible for the results of verbal, logical and mathematical tests to be trained for *in the likely available time*.

    Anyway: your comments please on why the culture fair test shows the Flynn Effect most reliably.

  114. @crimson2

    Sounds like a good plan. This is really only a problem if you’re a racist ideologue.

    It’s a problem if you’re not a Jew.

  115. @crimson2

    Let me get this straight. Some Jews got together with others and used ideas and communication to convince people that white supremacy was dumb and deluded and damaging.

    No. None of that happened.

    There were no “ideas”. There was no “convincing”. There was nothing dumb or damaging about “white supremacy.”. They did not get together with any “others”.

  116. @Rich

    People wanting to live among their own kind, preserving their towns and cities and schools and cultures is wrong?

    Yeah, that is wrong. Healthy people want to preserve themselves.

  117. @Wizard of Oz

    There’s some overlap – there are even Jewish-only Lodges at ‘Craft’/’Blue’ lodge level (what people think of when they say ‘The Masons’).

    In my jurisdiction the most-frequented Jewish-only lodge is Mt Scopus Old Boys’ Lodge (Mt Scopus College is/was a Jewish high school – it may no longer be Jewish-only… depends on whether the Red Sea Pedestrians are subject to the same laws against religious discrimination). It administers itself very differently from other Old Boys’ lodges (like the ones for ‘public’ schools – my Chapter lodge is actually called “Public Schools Chapter”, but accepts full-rights visits from people who went to government schools).

    The existence of Jews-only Lodges rankles some people who take fidelity, amity and fraternity seriously – because their practice violates core precepts of Freemasonry.

    For example, despite being an MM, I am prohibited from visiting their Lodge during its “work” – that is, its ritual – although I can visit in the ‘South’, i.e., the post-match festivities: in the Simpsons “Stonecutters” episode, ‘the South’ is the bit where they get drunk and play ping-pong. (In my jurisdiction we’re usually three sheets to the wind before Lodge starts – sherry and antipasto are our warmup – and yes we drink lots and eat well afterwards, but no ping-pong).

    In contrast, members of Jewish lodges are not restricted to the South when they visit non-Jewish Lodges. That gives some older Masons the sense that perhaps the Jewish lodges are corrupting the ritual (frankly, who gives a shit?)

    It is rarely the case that a single Scopus guy will visit a lodge by themselves: when they’ve visited my Lodge in the past, they arrive in a passel of about eight, and demand their own table in the South. This is commented upon by other Lodges as well, so it’s not just me channelling Hitler.

    Apart from that, there are plenty of (mostly secular) Jews sprinkled in amongst the members in ‘gentile’ Lodges; they’re particularly prevalent in Lodges where the bulk of the members are from the legal profession. The Jewish members of ‘gentile’ Lodges are marked by their open hostility to Scopus types, and to Judaism-proper (and Zionism).

    In ‘higher’ (actually just ‘other’) Orders, things get a whole lot Jewy-er – not in the membership, but in the mythology (which is always used allegorically and metaphorically). In one order, very large banners of the Tribes of Israel are hung from the ceiling along the walls, arrayed in a very specific pattern.

    You should have joined: membership still confers significant social advantages (so long as it’s not overtly abused).

    I think of it as a ‘signalling’ mechanism that is used to reduce search costs, coupled with a disciplinary layer that reduces risk: “if this guy is a Lodge man, I will trust him a priori… if he betrays that trust he puts his Masonic career (and his real-life career) at risk.”

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  118. @Kratoklastes

    Very interesting. How many Masons would there be in say Melbourne’s population of 5 million? What proportion of professional people would be Masons in such a city? And…. different issue…

    Why would a member of the collegiate Bar, for example, expect to gain from the trust factor?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.