The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 James Kirkpatrick Archive
Katie Hopkins and Katie McHugh–Fired by Media for Telling Truth About Islam
katies
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

On the 73rd anniversary of D-Day, it appears only a cynic could say France and the United Kingdom “won” World War II. As this is written, news comes of a self-described “soldier of the caliphate” attacking police in Paris, trapping thousands inside the Notre Dame Cathedral [This is for Syria,’ Man attacks police outside Paris’ Notre Dame Cathedral, 2000 trapped, by Alix Culbertson, Express, June 6, 2017]. This comes only days after the London Bridge terrorist attack, which itself came only days after the recent attack at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester. Terrorism is, as the new leader of France so memorably put it not long ago, almost literally part of the “daily lives” of Europeans now.

The response of those who rule the West and their Main Stream Media lackeys (it would be obscene to call them “elites”) is to deny a problem even exists and to attempt to destroy those who point it out.

There is now a distinct pattern of the Left claiming a scalp after each new terrorist attack. It remains to be seen who will be the victim after Paris, but two Katies were the casualties after the attacks in England; Katie Hopkins, formerly of the UK’s and Katie McHugh, formerly of Breitbart.

In both cases, the ostensible justification was a tweet made in anger immediately after the terrorist attacks. Katie Hopkins (who retains her column at the Daily Mail) called for a “final solution” to terrorism after the attack in Manchester. Presumably recognizing the unfortunate parallel of the phrasing, she quickly deleted the tweet, but continued to rage against how Muslim terrorism has become an accepted part of life in Britain. Needless to say, in the plain literal meaning of her statement, there was nothing untoward about what she said.

But in the birthplace of the English-speaking world’s liberties, this of course led to police reports against Katie Hopkins. She was soon afterward fired from LBC, a decision which we are told led to “cheers and applause” from the staff and was greeted by the Leftist press as some kind of a great national triumph [You’re Fired at last! Katie Hopkins is sacked by LBC after “final solution” tweet, New Statesman, May 26, 2017].

After the London Bridge attack, Katie McHugh of Breitbart also expressed a healthy sense of outrage and made the obvious point that such attacks would not be taking place if Muslims hadn’t, for some mysterious reason, been admitted into the United Kingdom.

The Left seized on her tweet, among other things mocking the young woman for supposedly ignoring the IRA. (Of course, as even the fanatically anti-Trump John Schindler noted, there is no comparison: The sheer number of jihadists in the United Kingdom, the Islamists’ eagerness to use indiscriminate violence, and the apocalyptic motives of the caliphate’s Western servants make both compromise and containment impossible. Schindler even referenced the great Enoch Powell and warned, “[I]t’s difficult to say Powell was wrong in his essential point” [There is no intelligence solution to Britain’s rivers of blood, New York Observer, June 4, 2017]).

Nonetheless, McHugh was fired by Breitbart. This was especially stunning given that at the very moment Cuckbart issued McHugh’s pink slip, Donald Trump was engaging in a campaign-style tweetstorm defending his travel ban from certain Muslim countries and Breitbart icon Nigel Farage, hero of Brexit and former leader of UKIP, was broaching the idea of internment camps [Farage says calls for internment camps for terrorist suspects could grow in Britain, RT, June 6, 2017].

Breitbart’s shameful conduct was especially concerning given the site’s publishing history and associations, which in the past included defiance of Political Correctness, frank reporting of racial realities in crime, and championing of European nationalist movements. McHugh’s tweet was not only true, it could barely even be considered edgy by Breitbart standards, or even National Review standards. Furthermore, it was a tweet.

Right-media watcher Will Sommer argues Breitbart is collapsing as it pursues respectability, advertisers, permanent congressional press passes etc. He predicts any employee who gets in the way of that quest can expect to be fired, observing accurately that McHugh would still have her job a year or two ago “when Breitbart still had a ‘black crime’ section and employed Milo Yiannopoulos” . [Between Breitbart and a Hard Place, by Will Sommer, Right Richter, June 6, 2017]

Charles Johnson of GotNews similarly charges Breitbart is losing hits, as well as its brand, because it is dependent on advertisers and donors, not readers.

Jonah Goldberg once called VDARE.com Dear Leader Peter Brimelow a “once-respected conservative voice” to which Brimelow countered that National Review had become a “once-conservative, now respected, magazine.”

Breitbart, of course, will be neither. The Left is committed to branding the site irrevocably as a “white nationalist” publication.

And significantly, the Left is assisted in this task by former writers from Beltway Right magazines like Betsy Woodruff of the Daily Beast, formerly of National Review and Red Alert Politics. Similarly, the journalist responsible for leading the point and sputter campaign that cowed Breitbart was Oliver Darcy, once Managing Editor of Glenn Beck’s The Blaze. The conservative Leadership Institute, where Darcy worked before The Blaze, once bragged he wasn’t a “typical liberal journalist” [The ‘Viral Genius’ Journalist, by Carmela Martinez and Carol Wehe, October 2, 2014]. But from his new perch at CNN, Darcy waged a sadly typical campaign to drive out McHugh, enabled of course by traitorous Breitbart colleagues eager to leak denunciations of her to the very network President Trump habitually labels “fake news” [Breitbart employees infuriated by colleagues ‘appalling’ comments after London terror attack, CNN, June 4, 2017].

Breitbart donors wondering why their investment’s value is plummeting should be demanding answers why the leakers weren’t the ones fired, not McHugh.

(In passing, it should be noted that activists who migrated from the Left to the Right include such titans as James Burnham and Whittaker Chambers. Can anyone imagine reading Betsy Woodruff or Oliver Darcy after their deaths?)

The urge to control speech after a terrorist attack by cracking down on victims is now typical of the so-called center-right. Theresa May’s solution to the problem of Muslim terrorism in the U.K. is to censor the Internet, which of course will take the form of an anarcho-tyranny policy of cracking down on British nationalists while doing nothing to stop jihadists [Theresa May’s Call for Internet Censorship Isn’t Limited To Fighting Terrorism, by Scott Shackford, Reason, June 5, 2017]. The only way you could use censorship to stop jihadists is if the U.K. took a page from Geert Wilder’s book and banned the Koran.

From Breitbart to May, from CNN to Ariana Grande, the West is living in denial. Hopkins and McHugh have been targeted because they suggest actually doing something to solve the problem, namely, 1) getting Muslims out of Europe and 2) stopping more from coming.

It’s not that Europeans and European-Americans don’t know this would solve the problem. Nor does anyone deny Europe is headed to submission if Muslim immigration continues. But to identify the obvious problem, the obvious solution, and the obvious consequences if the solution is not carried out is to impose a moral burden most Westerners do not want to accept.

Hence, Hopkins, McHugh and others like them become the targets of hatred, and their defenestration a cause for rejoicing, because to even allow them to speak would condemn those who remain imprisoned by their own cowardice.

At a certain point, the refusal to understand becomes a moral failing. The cuck who won’t dump his cheating girlfriend, the heroin addict who tells himself he doesn’t have a problem, the obese woman who insists she is healthy while destroying herself—all can be figures of sympathy, but only to a point. Those who present harsh truths to these unfortunates are often condemned for their trouble, those who offer comforting lies are praised by them. But given sufficient knowledge of both problem and solution, victimhood becomes collaboration.

We have reached this point in the West. Katie Hopkins and Katie McHugh are suffering for the sins of our supposed leaders, both in Conservatism Inc. and in the high councils of state.

To refuse to defend them is to join their tormentors and become complicit in our own destruction.

And to remain silent is acquiesce not just to their condemnation, but the condemnation of our entire civilization. James Kirkpatrick [Email him] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc.

(Republished from VDare.com by permission of author or representative)
 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
    []
  1. In the US, we are led to believe that Muslim terrorists attacked the World Trade Center in New York City, symbol of capitalism, and the Pentagon, symbol of American military might.
    A third plane that, we were told, was intended to attack the US Capitol, symbol of DEMOCRACY and FREEDOM, the ne plus ultra emblematic values of Americanism, somehow went astray and crashed into a strip-mining field in Pennsylvania.

    In France, we were told that Muslims were responsible for the attack on cartoonists who disrespected Islam.

    In England, we are told that ISIS attacked concertgoers who gathered to cheer as entertainers sing of “dicks so hard you can’t walk” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffHUG5rv1Mo

    In Iran today, ISIS quickly claimed credit for attacking that nation’s seat of government, its Parliament, where, even as representatives of the Iranian people were killed,

    “MPs continued scheduled sessions in another part of the complex. .”

    ISIS, who “were dressed as women in order to gain entry,” Did the female garments have tzit tzit, one wonders?

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/07/shootings-iranian-parliament-khomeini-shrine

    There are no reports of ISIS having attacked sites or persons in Israel.

    So what do we have?

    Over the last 16 years in which The Free and Democratic World © has engaged in a war on terror to bring freedom and democracy to all people everywhere, the only attack on actual representatives of the people took place in Iran.

    When the World Trade Center in New York City was attacked on 9/11, US lawmakers responded by gathering to sing the nation’s anthem, then clearing out of Washington, DC and going into hiding.

    The British responded by observing a minute of silence, then another few minutes of May fulminating, and then by hosting a reprise of a sexually explicit performance.

    So far, Iran’s Parliament has responded by going about its business.

    Stay tuned.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig

    A third plane that, we were told, was intended to attack the US Capitol, symbol of DEMOCRACY and FREEDOM, the ne plus ultra emblematic values of Americanism, somehow went astray and crashed into a strip-mining field in Pennsylvania.
     
    UA93, you mean? I thought it was supposed to hit WTC #7, the one building that went down without having been struck by a plane.
    , @jo6pac
    Thank You so much
    , @anonymous
    Were the Muslim grooming gangs in Rotherham really Jews ?
    Was Omar Mateen a Crypto Afghani Jew ?
    Were the truck attacks in Nice really perpetrated by a Jew ?
    Are the millions of Muslims flooding Europe and displacing the white Christian population really Jews pretending to be Muslims ?
    Is Omar Bashir a crypto Jew ?
    How about Pol Pot ? A crypto Jew also ??
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/article/katie-hopkins-and-katie-mchugh-fired-by-media-for-telling-truth-about-islam/#comment-1898089
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. We have reached this point in the West. Katie Hopkins and Katie McHugh are suffering for the sins of our supposed leaders, both in Conservatism Inc. and in the high councils of state.

    To refuse to defend them is to join their tormentors and become complicit in our own destruction.

    And to remain silent is acquiesce not just to their condemnation, but the condemnation of our entire civilization.

    The solution is slowly revealing itself to people – kill our leaders and the people who run the propaganda outlets (LSM). Nothing else is going to turn this Lemming race around. Will the frog learn it is being cooked to death before it is too late, or will it jump to save itself? Time will tell.

    Read More
  3. Islam is a dangerous cult that must be eradicated.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SMK
    Islam is not a "cult," an ephemeral gang of idiots and crazies led by David Koresh or Charles Manson, but a uniquely evil and baleful religion founded in the 7th Century by Muhammad, arguably the worst monster in all of history whose reign of terror and conquest, unlike that of Hitler and Lenin and Stalin and Mao and Pot Pot, has lasted almost 14 centuries and will soon destroy France, England, Germany, Sweden, Belgium, etc., unless the invasion of Muslims is ended and virtually all Muslims are expelled from Western Europe.

    Islam must be "eradicated." There will soon be almost 2 billion Muslims living in some 40 Islamic countries and in Western Europe, the United States, Canada, Australia. Do you suggest that the U.S. and a few other nations bomb and invade and occupy all Muslims countries, including Pakistan, a country of 170 million people with nuclear weapons, emulating our great successes in Iraq and Afghanistan, and exterminate 60-70% of the male population?

    For Europe and North America, the transparent solution is total separation from Islam: an end to Muslim immigration, forever, and mass-expulsions/deportations if Muslims; no more wars and invasions and occupations; no women in combat boots in Muslim countries; no invite-the-world/invade-the-world in respect to Muslims and Islamic countries. But that will never happen.

    , @JGarbo
    All religions should be eradicated. Only the mentally retarded can believe in a sky god who hears their mumblings. Idiotic.
  4. Halakha Law and Sharia Law are the ideologies of Semites and they are incompatible with western Christian ideals.

    Halakha and Sharia laws were invented by Semites not only to assist with their specific group survival, but also for Semites to parasite on or destroy non-Semites.

    Semites have found a huge number of allies inside the west who hate western Christian ideals, and we label them modern liberals, a gross misnomer since the US constitution was conceived by genuine liberals.

    Their latest group survival scheme is class supremacy, specifically victim class supremacy coupled with national democracy and mass propaganda, and all Semites do their part to make it happen.
    ….

    [MORE]

    Women are federally entitled because of Male oppression
    Jewish are federally entitled because of Gentile oppression
    Queers are federally entitled because of Straight oppression
    Muslims are federally entitled because of Christian oppression
    Disabled are federally entitled because of Healthy oppression
    Afro-blacks are federally entitled because of White oppression
    Latinos are federally entitled because of Gringo oppression
    Hispanics are federally entitled because of Gringo oppression
    Military Veterans are federally entitled because of Militia oppression
    Native Americans are federally entitled because of Paleface oppression
    Asians are federally entitled because of Occidental oppression
    National Socialist are federally entitled because of Local-state Government oppression
    Crony Capitalist are federally entitled because of Honest Businessmen oppression
    Zionist are federally entitled because of Anti-Fascist oppression

    Read More
  5. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    On the 73rd anniversary of D-Day, it appears only a cynic could say France and the United Kingdom “won” World War II.

    This is a very good article, with a bizarre lead-in. Can only a cynic say France “won” the War of the Spanish Succession, or that the British East India Company “won” the Anglo-Sikh wars?

    formerly of the UK’s

    Of the UK’s what exactly? LBC? Which I assume is this:http://www.lbc.co.uk/ ?

    Read More
  6. I think that the reason why the Islamic world is on a collision course with the west is because of outdated technology. You see, the Islamic world still uses the moral compass as a guidance method, where the sophisticated west relies on the far superior moral GPS system. As far as I can tell, the moral compass of the Islamic world is actually performing better than the crappy western moral GPS.

    How so? It’s simple, if anybody bothered to tally up the numbers for – let’s say 2017, the casualty figures in the Islamic world – caused by the phony western humanitarianism probably exceeds the casualties in the west caused by Islamic terrorism by a factor of at least 1000 to 1 if not more. Ah, but there is a catch, the casualties suffered by innocent victims in the Islamic world are result of the effort to bring democracy to the ME, so therefore it’s OK. The casualties suffered in the west, on the other hand, are aimless – not guided by such a noble cause like bringing democracy.

    One thing the west deserves credit for is that at least they are running an equal opportunity program – they are not content at only messing up the Islamic world, but also by inviting a large number of emigres from the ME they are trying to wreck their own countries too.

    Maybe the methods of the western based Islamic terrorists are not the best, but what they are trying to do is expose the phoniness of the west. Just because the west has allowed immigration from the Islamic countries doesn’t buy them the right to wreck the countries where those people came from. The Islamic world would be better off if the west stopped both accepting their nationals as immigrants and (violently) interfering in their internal affairs. They didn’t ask for any of those 2 acts of generosity from the west.

    Read More
    • Replies: @animalogic
    Good comment.
    The near funniest thing you can see is a western politician claiming that terrorism has NOTHING to do with our vicious antics in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, & so on. No they "hate our values" blah, blah.
    We have values ?
    The evidence builds that British intelligence services had either used members of the Manchester bombers family (against Gaddafi) or "turned a blind eye" to their movements. Yes -- OUR VALUES.... (Reminds me, vaguely of the Boston "bombers".) Why won't our tools just go back in the draw after we use them ?
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    Achmed has no argument with part of your comment, Cyrano. Your discussion of these 2 types of compasses leads to other thoughts about geography and euclidean geometry as related to the Moslem call to prayer. Achmed likes his geography.

    As usual, great article, Mr. Fitzpatrick - you and Mr. Fulford are the meat and potatoes of VDare.
    , @Sowhat
    I agree with you, Carano, but it's really about the petro-dollars and not social or religious ideaology. Deaths mean nothing to those banksters. History is repleat with examples that prove without a shadow of a doubt that human lives are not considered a cost in their investment plans to own the resources of the world.
  7. Breitbart is owned by the Mercer family who for some reason has begun to gut the news and commentary blog.

    The fact they fired a staffer of their’s for voicing a opinion that many on the Right hold shows how bad they’ve become.

    It could very well be Mercer bought up Breitbart to muzzle it. Typical oligarchic behavior. When the massacre of workers happened in Ludlow Colorado at the behest of Rockefeller and was reported on by the nations news papers. Not long afterwards those papers critical of Rockefeller were under new ownership.

    Drudge has also pretty much jumped the shark. Nothing but links to fake news outlets run by the oligarchs. Not worth going to anymore.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Yours is an excellent explanation of the change in Brietbart. I believe you.
    , @Seamus Padraig
    I had always suspected that Breitbart was a zionist front from the start, so this latest turn somehow doesn't shock me.
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    Rod, I never read very much on Breitbart only because too many damn windows and other ads would spend 2 minutes doing their thing as I tried to read one simple article (yes, I know about pop-up blockers, adbuster, etc. but I'm not always on my own computer). Your cooption theory sounds very plausible.

    As for Drudge, it's OK whan you are bored. However, his headlines usually make me think that the End Times have come (and gone, even!). Were one to take it all seriously every day for a month I could see early-onset Ted Kazynski syndrome appearing.
    , @Wally
    Knowing that Revisionist debunking of the impossible '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' cannot be refuted with rational, scientific debate has resulted in Breitbart censoring all comments which are in response to their constant promotion of the absurd 'holocau$t' narrative.

    It's a one way street with the hypocritical Breitbart.com, a Zionist fig leaf.

    Only liars censor debate.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

  8. This is a very disappointing article by a man who has shown great potential as an alt-right leader. In an uninspiring vein that is similar to what the great Pat Buchanan recently scribbled, Kirkpatrick laments “those who remain imprisoned by their own cowardice” vis-a-vis their failure to condemn Islamic fundamentalism for its ‘extremism’ and the ‘indiscriminate bombings’ that have killed hundreds in the West over the past 15 years. Hundreds of innocent civilians slaughtered.

    But it is Kirkpatrick who is showing cowardice.

    Yes, we can agree that ‘Muslims’ are (in general) not well-suited for life in our science-driven and nominally Christian civilization.

    At the same time, shouldn’t we be willing to take a hard and honest look at the mistakes that we ‘infidels’ have committed which has given rise to Islamic extremism?

    Or is this topic, Mr. Kirkpatrick, too explosive?

    James Kirkpatrick–who fancies himself brave and outspoken–consistently downplays (or ignores completely) the US and British and French (and Zionist) roots of the mayhem that has birthed ISIS, created widespread death, misery, anarchy and suffering throughout the Middle East; and which has contributed directly the refugee crisis that is now engulfing much of Western Europe.

    Kirkpatrick prefers an easier route: ignore political causation and focus just on theology.

    Thus, he heaps scorn on an easy target: the excessive religiosity of the victims of our glorious ‘democracy building’ interventions.

    But how can we ignore the hundreds of thousand of dead Muslim civilians at the hands of NATO and Zio-America? Doesn’t this carnage deserve at least a footnote?

    And what about the millions of civilians in Muslim-majority countries left homeless as a result of Washington’s penchant for high-tech, missile-aided ‘regime change’?

    Unimportant detail?

    Kirkpatrick’s oversights are both dishonest and cowardly.

    In fact, deploring Muslims is secretly (and no so secretly) quite acceptable in the West. Only it’s done with cant and virtue-signaling pretensions. But don’t be fooled. The body-count speaks volumes.

    Indeed, when one does an actual inventory of slaughtered Muslims (and some non-Muslims) courtesy of the great and progressive democracies of America, Britain, France and Israel, their staggering numbers suggest that everyday Muslims are indeed quite expendable. Who gives a shit? Just kill these ragheads.

    Callous and commonplace remarks of this kind certainly cannot be uttered about blacks or Jews.

    And while leading Western democracies talk loudly about human rights, their actions manifest hate and brutality on a routine basis. It’s called ‘government policy’.

    What’s taboo is revealing this hatefulness in rhetoric or conversation. Talk nice. But strike preemptively.

    In a similarly dishonest vein, the economic and cultural interests of non-elite whites in America and Europe are given little serious consideration. Thus the middle and white working classes are sinking towards oblivion. This decline is no accident. So let’s not blame just the hapless Muslim refugees here–as undesirable as they may be. They, too, are mere pawns in a much larger chess game.

    And why doesn’t Kirkpatrick and other crypto-neocons refer to these ‘Muslims’ by their country of origin?

    Why?

    Because it might remind people of the obvious:

    These destitute Muslims came here because our drones and missiles went there.

    The unmitigated and ongoing political disasters from Baghdad to Paris are largely of the West’s own making. And now Trump seems ready to pursue these same globalist follies.

    Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick- please take a moment to examine and acknowledge the vast and inexcusable damage done to the Muslim world (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Afghanistan, Libya, Iran and Yemen) by the advanced, intelligent, bomb-dropping Judeo-Christian world.

    How about a little balance? Why not look at the big picture?

    Since 2001, Zionized Western ‘democracies’ have killed millions and displaced millions more of these so-called ‘Islamic extremists’ as well as their families. But these Muslim states sought no war with America. Yet they now lay in ruins.

    Doesn’t then some of the official policies of several ‘leading’ Western democracies qualify as extreme? Millions believe so.

    As for ‘terrorism’, the civilian kill ratio presently favors glorious, free, nuclear-equipped, Anglo-Zionist empire by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

    What does that tell you?

    Ongoing, entrenched Zio-American foreign policy is a vast criminal enterprise that has rightfully earned the moniker ‘genocidal’.

    Read More
    • Agree: Randal
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    The MOHAMMADAN Gang Rape Army is not being driven into America by US-Zionist Foriegn Policy....they are being invited in by the US-Zionist Immigration Policy...


    Somebody mentioned Robert Mercer. Mercer is a Hedge Fund CEO Psychpath....His Empire is a mere 200-300 yards down the road from SUNY Stony Brook....drive past Stony Brook any hour of the day....24 hours a day of Greater China on full display. SUNY Stony Brook was paid for...built with the hands of America....90 percent Native Born White America.

    The White Liberal-Ronnie Reagan "Conservative" Greedy Cheating Class deserves the Vlad the Impaler treatment:sharp wooden steak through the filthy arse......up through the rectum...out the mouth....in an open field....the dried-dessicated-mouths-wide-open....good time for a traditional Native Born White American Family Picnic!!!!.....Play that Old Timey Music...YE HA!!!!


    Mercer is a filthy cockroach....I wish some of you would stop it with "Bannon is one of us nonsense"...Bannon is fat greedy Irish cockroach....So that's two fat greedy Irish cockroaches.....
    , @Biff

    for ‘terrorism’, the civilian kill ratio presently favors glorious, free, nuclear-equipped, Anglo-Zionist empire by a factor of about 1000 to 1.
     
    My gizmatron came up with 6927.325 to 1.
    , @windwaves
    Could not agree more.

    The jews, that criminal state called Israel and its slave, the USA. That is the real problem and why we are where we are today.

    The jews are destroying our great country, have been doing so, gradually, since WWII. Now that they have been in total control for a while we are at a point of exploding, at home and abroad with a foreign policy dictated to us by Israel.

    Good job. We need americans to wake up. And in the meantime, yes, of course, keep the muslims out.

  9. The simple fact that the west causes the terrorism itself must be even more taboo.

    Read More
  10. The solutions proposed by politicians, from the left and the right, are rightfully questionable and likely dangerous, possibly leading to a counterproductive end.

    The solutions proposed by the commentators on this thread are unequivocally unhinged.

    Read More
    • Replies: @englishmike

    The solutions proposed by politicians, from the left and the right, are rightfully questionable and likely dangerous, possibly leading to a counterproductive end.
    The solutions proposed by the commentators on this thread are unequivocally unhinged.
     
    Possibly. It's difficult to be sure when you assert your judgements in such vague, generalised terms.
    What solutions would you propose?
  11. @Cyrano
    I think that the reason why the Islamic world is on a collision course with the west is because of outdated technology. You see, the Islamic world still uses the moral compass as a guidance method, where the sophisticated west relies on the far superior moral GPS system. As far as I can tell, the moral compass of the Islamic world is actually performing better than the crappy western moral GPS.

    How so? It’s simple, if anybody bothered to tally up the numbers for – let’s say 2017, the casualty figures in the Islamic world – caused by the phony western humanitarianism probably exceeds the casualties in the west caused by Islamic terrorism by a factor of at least 1000 to 1 if not more. Ah, but there is a catch, the casualties suffered by innocent victims in the Islamic world are result of the effort to bring democracy to the ME, so therefore it’s OK. The casualties suffered in the west, on the other hand, are aimless – not guided by such a noble cause like bringing democracy.

    One thing the west deserves credit for is that at least they are running an equal opportunity program – they are not content at only messing up the Islamic world, but also by inviting a large number of emigres from the ME they are trying to wreck their own countries too.

    Maybe the methods of the western based Islamic terrorists are not the best, but what they are trying to do is expose the phoniness of the west. Just because the west has allowed immigration from the Islamic countries doesn’t buy them the right to wreck the countries where those people came from. The Islamic world would be better off if the west stopped both accepting their nationals as immigrants and (violently) interfering in their internal affairs. They didn't ask for any of those 2 acts of generosity from the west.

    Good comment.
    The near funniest thing you can see is a western politician claiming that terrorism has NOTHING to do with our vicious antics in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, & so on. No they “hate our values” blah, blah.
    We have values ?
    The evidence builds that British intelligence services had either used members of the Manchester bombers family (against Gaddafi) or “turned a blind eye” to their movements. Yes — OUR VALUES…. (Reminds me, vaguely of the Boston “bombers”.) Why won’t our tools just go back in the draw after we use them ?

    Read More
  12. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Rod1963
    Breitbart is owned by the Mercer family who for some reason has begun to gut the news and commentary blog.

    The fact they fired a staffer of their's for voicing a opinion that many on the Right hold shows how bad they've become.

    It could very well be Mercer bought up Breitbart to muzzle it. Typical oligarchic behavior. When the massacre of workers happened in Ludlow Colorado at the behest of Rockefeller and was reported on by the nations news papers. Not long afterwards those papers critical of Rockefeller were under new ownership.

    Drudge has also pretty much jumped the shark. Nothing but links to fake news outlets run by the oligarchs. Not worth going to anymore.

    Yours is an excellent explanation of the change in Brietbart. I believe you.

    Read More
  13. It seems that if our European friends would be free of terrorism they must first practice a little terrorism against their leaders! Yep! Dead leaders is now a prerequisite to removing the scourge of terrorism!

    Read More
  14. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    the banking mafia want to destroy the western nations for divide and rule

    the media are the banking mafia’s army

    Read More
  15. @SolontoCroesus
    In the US, we are led to believe that Muslim terrorists attacked the World Trade Center in New York City, symbol of capitalism, and the Pentagon, symbol of American military might.
    A third plane that, we were told, was intended to attack the US Capitol, symbol of DEMOCRACY and FREEDOM, the ne plus ultra emblematic values of Americanism, somehow went astray and crashed into a strip-mining field in Pennsylvania.

    In France, we were told that Muslims were responsible for the attack on cartoonists who disrespected Islam.

    In England, we are told that ISIS attacked concertgoers who gathered to cheer as entertainers sing of "dicks so hard you can't walk" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffHUG5rv1Mo

    In Iran today, ISIS quickly claimed credit for attacking that nation's seat of government, its Parliament, where, even as representatives of the Iranian people were killed,


    "MPs continued scheduled sessions in another part of the complex. ."
     
    ISIS, who "were dressed as women in order to gain entry," Did the female garments have tzit tzit, one wonders?
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/07/shootings-iranian-parliament-khomeini-shrine

    There are no reports of ISIS having attacked sites or persons in Israel.

    So what do we have?

    Over the last 16 years in which The Free and Democratic World © has engaged in a war on terror to bring freedom and democracy to all people everywhere, the only attack on actual representatives of the people took place in Iran.

    When the World Trade Center in New York City was attacked on 9/11, US lawmakers responded by gathering to sing the nation's anthem, then clearing out of Washington, DC and going into hiding.

    The British responded by observing a minute of silence, then another few minutes of May fulminating, and then by hosting a reprise of a sexually explicit performance.

    So far, Iran's Parliament has responded by going about its business.

    Stay tuned.

    A third plane that, we were told, was intended to attack the US Capitol, symbol of DEMOCRACY and FREEDOM, the ne plus ultra emblematic values of Americanism, somehow went astray and crashed into a strip-mining field in Pennsylvania.

    UA93, you mean? I thought it was supposed to hit WTC #7, the one building that went down without having been struck by a plane.

    Read More
  16. @Rod1963
    Breitbart is owned by the Mercer family who for some reason has begun to gut the news and commentary blog.

    The fact they fired a staffer of their's for voicing a opinion that many on the Right hold shows how bad they've become.

    It could very well be Mercer bought up Breitbart to muzzle it. Typical oligarchic behavior. When the massacre of workers happened in Ludlow Colorado at the behest of Rockefeller and was reported on by the nations news papers. Not long afterwards those papers critical of Rockefeller were under new ownership.

    Drudge has also pretty much jumped the shark. Nothing but links to fake news outlets run by the oligarchs. Not worth going to anymore.

    I had always suspected that Breitbart was a zionist front from the start, so this latest turn somehow doesn’t shock me.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sowhat
    This would also explain why Breitbart affiliates in Trump's transition crew were originally there and got the boot. Good observation
  17. Mr. Kirkpatrick is far too intelligent not to know that the masters of these terrorists are using these mercenaries to make desired political changes. Why are they always shot dead, and their identification papers readily available at the crime scene? Always the same pattern, the same script. That these two misinformed ladies are fired serves an agenda that has nothing to do with Muslims.

    Read More
  18. The women especially the Jewess Hopkins are tools of the Cabal to get more agitation between Christians and Muslims…for the benefit of the, yes you got it, the JEWS! A pox on them!
    As far as assimilation, if the Muslims living in our world can’t cope with our Christian/Western based values, leave or get deported!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sowhat

    As far as assimilation, if the Muslims living in our world can’t cope with our Christian/Western based values, leave or get deported!
     
    For decades, many Muslims immigrated here and assimilated well. It would be wise to relax the all-inclusive demonization. Those who do not are all falling for the manipulation of public opinion by "guess who".
  19. @Cyrano
    I think that the reason why the Islamic world is on a collision course with the west is because of outdated technology. You see, the Islamic world still uses the moral compass as a guidance method, where the sophisticated west relies on the far superior moral GPS system. As far as I can tell, the moral compass of the Islamic world is actually performing better than the crappy western moral GPS.

    How so? It’s simple, if anybody bothered to tally up the numbers for – let’s say 2017, the casualty figures in the Islamic world – caused by the phony western humanitarianism probably exceeds the casualties in the west caused by Islamic terrorism by a factor of at least 1000 to 1 if not more. Ah, but there is a catch, the casualties suffered by innocent victims in the Islamic world are result of the effort to bring democracy to the ME, so therefore it’s OK. The casualties suffered in the west, on the other hand, are aimless – not guided by such a noble cause like bringing democracy.

    One thing the west deserves credit for is that at least they are running an equal opportunity program – they are not content at only messing up the Islamic world, but also by inviting a large number of emigres from the ME they are trying to wreck their own countries too.

    Maybe the methods of the western based Islamic terrorists are not the best, but what they are trying to do is expose the phoniness of the west. Just because the west has allowed immigration from the Islamic countries doesn’t buy them the right to wreck the countries where those people came from. The Islamic world would be better off if the west stopped both accepting their nationals as immigrants and (violently) interfering in their internal affairs. They didn't ask for any of those 2 acts of generosity from the west.

    Achmed has no argument with part of your comment, Cyrano. Your discussion of these 2 types of compasses leads to other thoughts about geography and euclidean geometry as related to the Moslem call to prayer. Achmed likes his geography.

    As usual, great article, Mr. Fitzpatrick – you and Mr. Fulford are the meat and potatoes of VDare.

    Read More
  20. Jun 5, 2017 London Bridge staged hoax – crisis actors change clothes

    May 23, 2017 Manchester Bombing: The Papers, The Speculation, the Click-Baiting, “ISIS Responsible”

    US officials have stated within a few hours that the perpetrator was a suicide bomber. What evidence they have for that considering that Britain is the most heavily surveilled state in the world, one can only ponder.

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/manchester-bombing-the-papers-the-speculation-and-the-click-baiting/5591615

    Read More
  21. @Cyrano
    I think that the reason why the Islamic world is on a collision course with the west is because of outdated technology. You see, the Islamic world still uses the moral compass as a guidance method, where the sophisticated west relies on the far superior moral GPS system. As far as I can tell, the moral compass of the Islamic world is actually performing better than the crappy western moral GPS.

    How so? It’s simple, if anybody bothered to tally up the numbers for – let’s say 2017, the casualty figures in the Islamic world – caused by the phony western humanitarianism probably exceeds the casualties in the west caused by Islamic terrorism by a factor of at least 1000 to 1 if not more. Ah, but there is a catch, the casualties suffered by innocent victims in the Islamic world are result of the effort to bring democracy to the ME, so therefore it’s OK. The casualties suffered in the west, on the other hand, are aimless – not guided by such a noble cause like bringing democracy.

    One thing the west deserves credit for is that at least they are running an equal opportunity program – they are not content at only messing up the Islamic world, but also by inviting a large number of emigres from the ME they are trying to wreck their own countries too.

    Maybe the methods of the western based Islamic terrorists are not the best, but what they are trying to do is expose the phoniness of the west. Just because the west has allowed immigration from the Islamic countries doesn’t buy them the right to wreck the countries where those people came from. The Islamic world would be better off if the west stopped both accepting their nationals as immigrants and (violently) interfering in their internal affairs. They didn't ask for any of those 2 acts of generosity from the west.

    I agree with you, Carano, but it’s really about the petro-dollars and not social or religious ideaology. Deaths mean nothing to those banksters. History is repleat with examples that prove without a shadow of a doubt that human lives are not considered a cost in their investment plans to own the resources of the world.

    Read More
  22. @Rod1963
    Breitbart is owned by the Mercer family who for some reason has begun to gut the news and commentary blog.

    The fact they fired a staffer of their's for voicing a opinion that many on the Right hold shows how bad they've become.

    It could very well be Mercer bought up Breitbart to muzzle it. Typical oligarchic behavior. When the massacre of workers happened in Ludlow Colorado at the behest of Rockefeller and was reported on by the nations news papers. Not long afterwards those papers critical of Rockefeller were under new ownership.

    Drudge has also pretty much jumped the shark. Nothing but links to fake news outlets run by the oligarchs. Not worth going to anymore.

    Rod, I never read very much on Breitbart only because too many damn windows and other ads would spend 2 minutes doing their thing as I tried to read one simple article (yes, I know about pop-up blockers, adbuster, etc. but I’m not always on my own computer). Your cooption theory sounds very plausible.

    As for Drudge, it’s OK whan you are bored. However, his headlines usually make me think that the End Times have come (and gone, even!). Were one to take it all seriously every day for a month I could see early-onset Ted Kazynski syndrome appearing.

    Read More
  23. @Robert Dunn
    It seems that if our European friends would be free of terrorism they must first practice a little terrorism against their leaders! Yep! Dead leaders is now a prerequisite to removing the scourge of terrorism!

    Isn’t that what is required, worldwide?

    Read More
  24. A solution might be to stop the program known to many as “invade the world/invite the world.” It should be obvious by now that the west has no intention of doing either.

    Read More
  25. What outlets like Breitbart don’t understand is that once the left has decided you’re a Nazi, there’s no going back. No amount of toadying to them is going to change that so if you’re going to be right wing, you might as well go all the way and be far right. And by sucking up to the left, you alienate your right wing base and are left with nobody, despised by all as cuckservatives always are.

    Trump has the same problem of course.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sowhat
    I suspect that as Trump gained the white House that, at the same time, The Globalists took Breitbart by silent coup.
  26. @Johnny Smoggins
    What outlets like Breitbart don't understand is that once the left has decided you're a Nazi, there's no going back. No amount of toadying to them is going to change that so if you're going to be right wing, you might as well go all the way and be far right. And by sucking up to the left, you alienate your right wing base and are left with nobody, despised by all as cuckservatives always are.

    Trump has the same problem of course.

    I suspect that as Trump gained the white House that, at the same time, The Globalists took Breitbart by silent coup.

    Read More
  27. @Rod1963
    Breitbart is owned by the Mercer family who for some reason has begun to gut the news and commentary blog.

    The fact they fired a staffer of their's for voicing a opinion that many on the Right hold shows how bad they've become.

    It could very well be Mercer bought up Breitbart to muzzle it. Typical oligarchic behavior. When the massacre of workers happened in Ludlow Colorado at the behest of Rockefeller and was reported on by the nations news papers. Not long afterwards those papers critical of Rockefeller were under new ownership.

    Drudge has also pretty much jumped the shark. Nothing but links to fake news outlets run by the oligarchs. Not worth going to anymore.

    Knowing that Revisionist debunking of the impossible ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ cannot be refuted with rational, scientific debate has resulted in Breitbart censoring all comments which are in response to their constant promotion of the absurd ‘holocau$t’ narrative.

    It’s a one way street with the hypocritical Breitbart.com, a Zionist fig leaf.

    Only liars censor debate.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

    Read More
  28. @Seamus Padraig
    I had always suspected that Breitbart was a zionist front from the start, so this latest turn somehow doesn't shock me.

    This would also explain why Breitbart affiliates in Trump’s transition crew were originally there and got the boot. Good observation

    Read More
  29. Good

    Speech has consequences and those who engage in hate speech must be met with force and power

    Read More
    • Replies: @englishmike

    Speech has consequences and those who engage in hate speech must be met with force and power
     
    Why? Because you have a right to free speech but they do not? Or because you hate them?
  30. @Mark Green
    This is a very disappointing article by a man who has shown great potential as an alt-right leader. In an uninspiring vein that is similar to what the great Pat Buchanan recently scribbled, Kirkpatrick laments "those who remain imprisoned by their own cowardice" vis-a-vis their failure to condemn Islamic fundamentalism for its 'extremism' and the 'indiscriminate bombings' that have killed hundreds in the West over the past 15 years. Hundreds of innocent civilians slaughtered.

    But it is Kirkpatrick who is showing cowardice.

    Yes, we can agree that 'Muslims' are (in general) not well-suited for life in our science-driven and nominally Christian civilization.

    At the same time, shouldn't we be willing to take a hard and honest look at the mistakes that we 'infidels' have committed which has given rise to Islamic extremism?

    Or is this topic, Mr. Kirkpatrick, too explosive?

    James Kirkpatrick--who fancies himself brave and outspoken--consistently downplays (or ignores completely) the US and British and French (and Zionist) roots of the mayhem that has birthed ISIS, created widespread death, misery, anarchy and suffering throughout the Middle East; and which has contributed directly the refugee crisis that is now engulfing much of Western Europe.

    Kirkpatrick prefers an easier route: ignore political causation and focus just on theology.

    Thus, he heaps scorn on an easy target: the excessive religiosity of the victims of our glorious 'democracy building' interventions.

    But how can we ignore the hundreds of thousand of dead Muslim civilians at the hands of NATO and Zio-America? Doesn't this carnage deserve at least a footnote?

    And what about the millions of civilians in Muslim-majority countries left homeless as a result of Washington's penchant for high-tech, missile-aided 'regime change'?

    Unimportant detail?

    Kirkpatrick's oversights are both dishonest and cowardly.

    In fact, deploring Muslims is secretly (and no so secretly) quite acceptable in the West. Only it's done with cant and virtue-signaling pretensions. But don't be fooled. The body-count speaks volumes.

    Indeed, when one does an actual inventory of slaughtered Muslims (and some non-Muslims) courtesy of the great and progressive democracies of America, Britain, France and Israel, their staggering numbers suggest that everyday Muslims are indeed quite expendable. Who gives a shit? Just kill these ragheads.

    Callous and commonplace remarks of this kind certainly cannot be uttered about blacks or Jews.

    And while leading Western democracies talk loudly about human rights, their actions manifest hate and brutality on a routine basis. It's called 'government policy'.

    What's taboo is revealing this hatefulness in rhetoric or conversation. Talk nice. But strike preemptively.

    In a similarly dishonest vein, the economic and cultural interests of non-elite whites in America and Europe are given little serious consideration. Thus the middle and white working classes are sinking towards oblivion. This decline is no accident. So let's not blame just the hapless Muslim refugees here--as undesirable as they may be. They, too, are mere pawns in a much larger chess game.

    And why doesn't Kirkpatrick and other crypto-neocons refer to these 'Muslims' by their country of origin?

    Why?

    Because it might remind people of the obvious:

    These destitute Muslims came here because our drones and missiles went there.

    The unmitigated and ongoing political disasters from Baghdad to Paris are largely of the West's own making. And now Trump seems ready to pursue these same globalist follies.

    Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick- please take a moment to examine and acknowledge the vast and inexcusable damage done to the Muslim world (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Afghanistan, Libya, Iran and Yemen) by the advanced, intelligent, bomb-dropping Judeo-Christian world.

    How about a little balance? Why not look at the big picture?

    Since 2001, Zionized Western 'democracies' have killed millions and displaced millions more of these so-called 'Islamic extremists' as well as their families. But these Muslim states sought no war with America. Yet they now lay in ruins.

    Doesn't then some of the official policies of several 'leading' Western democracies qualify as extreme? Millions believe so.

    As for 'terrorism', the civilian kill ratio presently favors glorious, free, nuclear-equipped, Anglo-Zionist empire by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

    What does that tell you?

    Ongoing, entrenched Zio-American foreign policy is a vast criminal enterprise that has rightfully earned the moniker 'genocidal'.

    The MOHAMMADAN Gang Rape Army is not being driven into America by US-Zionist Foriegn Policy….they are being invited in by the US-Zionist Immigration Policy…

    Somebody mentioned Robert Mercer. Mercer is a Hedge Fund CEO Psychpath….His Empire is a mere 200-300 yards down the road from SUNY Stony Brook….drive past Stony Brook any hour of the day….24 hours a day of Greater China on full display. SUNY Stony Brook was paid for…built with the hands of America….90 percent Native Born White America.

    The White Liberal-Ronnie Reagan “Conservative” Greedy Cheating Class deserves the Vlad the Impaler treatment:sharp wooden steak through the filthy arse……up through the rectum…out the mouth….in an open field….the dried-dessicated-mouths-wide-open….good time for a traditional Native Born White American Family Picnic!!!!…..Play that Old Timey Music…YE HA!!!!

    Mercer is a filthy cockroach….I wish some of you would stop it with “Bannon is one of us nonsense”…Bannon is fat greedy Irish cockroach….So that’s two fat greedy Irish cockroaches…..

    Read More
  31. @Z-man
    The women especially the Jewess Hopkins are tools of the Cabal to get more agitation between Christians and Muslims...for the benefit of the, yes you got it, the JEWS! A pox on them!
    As far as assimilation, if the Muslims living in our world can't cope with our Christian/Western based values, leave or get deported!

    As far as assimilation, if the Muslims living in our world can’t cope with our Christian/Western based values, leave or get deported!

    For decades, many Muslims immigrated here and assimilated well. It would be wise to relax the all-inclusive demonization. Those who do not are all falling for the manipulation of public opinion by “guess who”.

    Read More
  32. Breitbart dramatically changed after the (very suspicious) death of Andrew Breitbart. Today it is highly regulated and increasingly focuses on the enforcement of political correctness in it’s coverage and commentaries. The decline of Breitbart as a website and the re-vamping of the entire FoxNews protocols of agenda are not, I think, coincidental.

    Read More
  33. We live in a fantasy world.

    If Europeans make believe that masses of invaders are ‘New Europeans’, there you go.
    That’s ‘reality’. It’s like we are made to believe trannies are ‘women’. We must will ourselves to believe. It’s no wonder that globalists push both trans-genderism and trans-nationalism. Both weaken a sense of roots, loyalty, and origins. It’s an Imitation of Life. Pop Culture fantasy based on vanity and delusion. And it is exploited and manipulated by elites who act as pushers of fantasy on the masses as junkies.

    So, after the terror attacks, we have the same kind of fantasy opiate about UK needs more Diversity, Islam is a religion of peace, and things will improve with even more invaders.

    Since reality is now about fantasy, maybe losers can imagine themselves to be winners. Japan lost the war to the US, but maybe if Japanese make themselves believe that that they won, they won. Trans-history and Trans-politics.
    Maybe Hitler was not wrong to fantasize that he had all these divisions in the closing chapter of WWII. If a man imagines himself to be a woman, he is. If Hitler imagined himself to have 20 more divisions and lots of tanks and planes, that was reality too.

    Fake News should be called Trans-News.

    Read More
  34. Idiots all around.
    Muslims suck at killing.
    The Anglo/Zionist war machine tops the charts.

    Read More
  35. Look at today’s UK. It’s been Africanized with interracist Jungle Fever and degraded with putrid homomania. It’s Ugabuga and Buggery, or Ugabuggery. Things are so bad that what passes for a ‘conservative’ in the UK is a Milo, a fake blonde homo who took a gallon of African sperm up his bung.

    Anglo-Saxons are into Jungle Culture. They are Junglo-Saxons.

    And PC warped the minds of Junglo-Saxons into thinking UK is a ‘nation of immigrants’ because, prior to the rise of British nation-state, it had been invaded by Romans and Vikings.

    Also, in the absence of religion and good ole patriotism, the ONLY way Britons can feel righteous and justified these days is via the virtue-vanity of being ‘anti-racist’ and embracing Diversity. THAT is the main meaning of their life: the me-hugging high they get from sniffing PC glue.

    Read More
    • Replies: @englishmike

    Things are so bad that what passes for a ‘conservative’ in the UK is a Milo, a fake blonde homo...
     
    How many "Britons" fitting your exotic racial stereotyping have you actually met? Did you find more than three who even knew who "Milo" is? I thought he was a phenomenon of USA political/media culture.

    And PC warped the minds of Junglo-Saxons into thinking UK is a ‘nation of immigrants’ because, prior to the rise of British nation-state, it had been invaded by Romans and Vikings.
     
    More likely because successive modern British governments have turned us into one without asking if that is what we wanted. Prime Minister Tony Blair, a notorious culprit, reportedly wanted to "rub the noses of the right in diversity". So it doesn't seem to have been mainly for the benefit of the immigrants.
  36. @SolontoCroesus
    In the US, we are led to believe that Muslim terrorists attacked the World Trade Center in New York City, symbol of capitalism, and the Pentagon, symbol of American military might.
    A third plane that, we were told, was intended to attack the US Capitol, symbol of DEMOCRACY and FREEDOM, the ne plus ultra emblematic values of Americanism, somehow went astray and crashed into a strip-mining field in Pennsylvania.

    In France, we were told that Muslims were responsible for the attack on cartoonists who disrespected Islam.

    In England, we are told that ISIS attacked concertgoers who gathered to cheer as entertainers sing of "dicks so hard you can't walk" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffHUG5rv1Mo

    In Iran today, ISIS quickly claimed credit for attacking that nation's seat of government, its Parliament, where, even as representatives of the Iranian people were killed,


    "MPs continued scheduled sessions in another part of the complex. ."
     
    ISIS, who "were dressed as women in order to gain entry," Did the female garments have tzit tzit, one wonders?
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/07/shootings-iranian-parliament-khomeini-shrine

    There are no reports of ISIS having attacked sites or persons in Israel.

    So what do we have?

    Over the last 16 years in which The Free and Democratic World © has engaged in a war on terror to bring freedom and democracy to all people everywhere, the only attack on actual representatives of the people took place in Iran.

    When the World Trade Center in New York City was attacked on 9/11, US lawmakers responded by gathering to sing the nation's anthem, then clearing out of Washington, DC and going into hiding.

    The British responded by observing a minute of silence, then another few minutes of May fulminating, and then by hosting a reprise of a sexually explicit performance.

    So far, Iran's Parliament has responded by going about its business.

    Stay tuned.

    Thank You so much

    Read More
  37. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    “Europe is headed to submission”

    Submission to the One God? Not bloody likely!

    Perhaps if it sheds its white supremacy, and unlimited greed, and unabashed psychopathy, perhaps then it could get lucky.

    Surely, that is not happening for centuries or millennia, right.

    When centuries or millennia from now, after your kind has wilfully learned to submit, they will ponder in wondrous pity of their glorious ancestors, and of their glory short-lived.

    Read More
  38. So these two chicks lost their jobs for expressing their extremist views on Islam.

    How many US politicians have lost their jobs for their realistic views on Israel? E.g., Cynthia McKinney, anyone?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {expressing their extremist views on Islam.}

    What part of their views is, quote, 'extremist'?
    , @anonymous
    Cynthia McKinney is borderline mentally retarded.

    She thinks The United States government executed 5,000 black males in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina .

    She cares about 1,000 Muslims killed in Gaza but remained silent over the hundreds of thousands killed by Islamic regimes in Sudan , Mauritania, Somalia , Morocco and Indonesia during her term in government.
    , @MEexpert

    How many US politicians have lost their jobs for their realistic views on Israel? E.g., Cynthia McKinney, anyone?
     
    How about Senator Percy and Senator Stevenson in Illinois? Senator Abourezk of South Dakota quit in disgust because of Israel's occupation of the US congress. Senator Fulbright of Arkansas. I can go on. And lastly, George H. W. Bush, the 41st President.
  39. @Tiny Duck
    Good

    Speech has consequences and those who engage in hate speech must be met with force and power

    Speech has consequences and those who engage in hate speech must be met with force and power

    Why? Because you have a right to free speech but they do not? Or because you hate them?

    Read More
  40. @jacques sheete
    So these two chicks lost their jobs for expressing their extremist views on Islam.

    How many US politicians have lost their jobs for their realistic views on Israel? E.g., Cynthia McKinney, anyone?

    {expressing their extremist views on Islam.}

    What part of their views is, quote, ‘extremist’?

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    What part of their views is, quote, ‘extremist’?
     
    If you expect a reasonable answer, you may want to consider asking a reasonable question.

    P.S.: Trolls get laughed at and eventually people start to ignore them. You're getting close.
  41. @Priss Factor
    Look at today's UK. It's been Africanized with interracist Jungle Fever and degraded with putrid homomania. It's Ugabuga and Buggery, or Ugabuggery. Things are so bad that what passes for a 'conservative' in the UK is a Milo, a fake blonde homo who took a gallon of African sperm up his bung.

    Anglo-Saxons are into Jungle Culture. They are Junglo-Saxons.

    And PC warped the minds of Junglo-Saxons into thinking UK is a 'nation of immigrants' because, prior to the rise of British nation-state, it had been invaded by Romans and Vikings.

    Also, in the absence of religion and good ole patriotism, the ONLY way Britons can feel righteous and justified these days is via the virtue-vanity of being 'anti-racist' and embracing Diversity. THAT is the main meaning of their life: the me-hugging high they get from sniffing PC glue.

    Things are so bad that what passes for a ‘conservative’ in the UK is a Milo, a fake blonde homo…

    How many “Britons” fitting your exotic racial stereotyping have you actually met? Did you find more than three who even knew who “Milo” is? I thought he was a phenomenon of USA political/media culture.

    And PC warped the minds of Junglo-Saxons into thinking UK is a ‘nation of immigrants’ because, prior to the rise of British nation-state, it had been invaded by Romans and Vikings.

    More likely because successive modern British governments have turned us into one without asking if that is what we wanted. Prime Minister Tony Blair, a notorious culprit, reportedly wanted to “rub the noses of the right in diversity”. So it doesn’t seem to have been mainly for the benefit of the immigrants.

    Read More
  42. @LauraMR
    The solutions proposed by politicians, from the left and the right, are rightfully questionable and likely dangerous, possibly leading to a counterproductive end.

    The solutions proposed by the commentators on this thread are unequivocally unhinged.

    The solutions proposed by politicians, from the left and the right, are rightfully questionable and likely dangerous, possibly leading to a counterproductive end.
    The solutions proposed by the commentators on this thread are unequivocally unhinged.

    Possibly. It’s difficult to be sure when you assert your judgements in such vague, generalised terms.
    What solutions would you propose?

    Read More
  43. @Avery
    {expressing their extremist views on Islam.}

    What part of their views is, quote, 'extremist'?

    What part of their views is, quote, ‘extremist’?

    If you expect a reasonable answer, you may want to consider asking a reasonable question.

    P.S.: Trolls get laughed at and eventually people start to ignore them. You’re getting close.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {If you expect a reasonable answer, you may want to consider asking a reasonable question.}

    You are unable to answer my question, because there is nothing in what either Hopkins or McHugh wrote that can be considered 'extremist' by anyone other than a loon.

    {P.S.: Trolls get laughed at and eventually people start to ignore them. You’re getting close.}


    I am really worried now, but I'll do my best to cross the threshold.
  44. @jacques sheete

    What part of their views is, quote, ‘extremist’?
     
    If you expect a reasonable answer, you may want to consider asking a reasonable question.

    P.S.: Trolls get laughed at and eventually people start to ignore them. You're getting close.

    {If you expect a reasonable answer, you may want to consider asking a reasonable question.}

    You are unable to answer my question, because there is nothing in what either Hopkins or McHugh wrote that can be considered ‘extremist’ by anyone other than a loon.

    {P.S.: Trolls get laughed at and eventually people start to ignore them. You’re getting close.}

    I am really worried now, but I’ll do my best to cross the threshold.

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH
    You must understand that certain posters believe that, regardless of the evidence, anytime a Muslim or group of Muslims commits acts of violence in the West (against non-Muslims) that it is the West's fault, that they are merely pawns of Western intelligence agencies/false flag, or they are "fake" Muslims since "real" Muslims would never harm a fly. They are rigid ideologues on this subject and really can't be reasoned with.

    And I know how the Jewish questions ties in to all this and will be the first to condemn our reckless foreign policy in the Middle East and the associated death toll, but that doesn't grant Muslims license to enter the West as so called refugees and kill and bomb Western citizens when they are being showered with smart phones, apartments, clothes, food, medical care and good will.

    I just wonder if they would still serve as Allah's excuse makers if one of their dear loved ones were ever ruthlessly cut down by a Muslim in a terrorist attack.

  45. @Mark Green
    This is a very disappointing article by a man who has shown great potential as an alt-right leader. In an uninspiring vein that is similar to what the great Pat Buchanan recently scribbled, Kirkpatrick laments "those who remain imprisoned by their own cowardice" vis-a-vis their failure to condemn Islamic fundamentalism for its 'extremism' and the 'indiscriminate bombings' that have killed hundreds in the West over the past 15 years. Hundreds of innocent civilians slaughtered.

    But it is Kirkpatrick who is showing cowardice.

    Yes, we can agree that 'Muslims' are (in general) not well-suited for life in our science-driven and nominally Christian civilization.

    At the same time, shouldn't we be willing to take a hard and honest look at the mistakes that we 'infidels' have committed which has given rise to Islamic extremism?

    Or is this topic, Mr. Kirkpatrick, too explosive?

    James Kirkpatrick--who fancies himself brave and outspoken--consistently downplays (or ignores completely) the US and British and French (and Zionist) roots of the mayhem that has birthed ISIS, created widespread death, misery, anarchy and suffering throughout the Middle East; and which has contributed directly the refugee crisis that is now engulfing much of Western Europe.

    Kirkpatrick prefers an easier route: ignore political causation and focus just on theology.

    Thus, he heaps scorn on an easy target: the excessive religiosity of the victims of our glorious 'democracy building' interventions.

    But how can we ignore the hundreds of thousand of dead Muslim civilians at the hands of NATO and Zio-America? Doesn't this carnage deserve at least a footnote?

    And what about the millions of civilians in Muslim-majority countries left homeless as a result of Washington's penchant for high-tech, missile-aided 'regime change'?

    Unimportant detail?

    Kirkpatrick's oversights are both dishonest and cowardly.

    In fact, deploring Muslims is secretly (and no so secretly) quite acceptable in the West. Only it's done with cant and virtue-signaling pretensions. But don't be fooled. The body-count speaks volumes.

    Indeed, when one does an actual inventory of slaughtered Muslims (and some non-Muslims) courtesy of the great and progressive democracies of America, Britain, France and Israel, their staggering numbers suggest that everyday Muslims are indeed quite expendable. Who gives a shit? Just kill these ragheads.

    Callous and commonplace remarks of this kind certainly cannot be uttered about blacks or Jews.

    And while leading Western democracies talk loudly about human rights, their actions manifest hate and brutality on a routine basis. It's called 'government policy'.

    What's taboo is revealing this hatefulness in rhetoric or conversation. Talk nice. But strike preemptively.

    In a similarly dishonest vein, the economic and cultural interests of non-elite whites in America and Europe are given little serious consideration. Thus the middle and white working classes are sinking towards oblivion. This decline is no accident. So let's not blame just the hapless Muslim refugees here--as undesirable as they may be. They, too, are mere pawns in a much larger chess game.

    And why doesn't Kirkpatrick and other crypto-neocons refer to these 'Muslims' by their country of origin?

    Why?

    Because it might remind people of the obvious:

    These destitute Muslims came here because our drones and missiles went there.

    The unmitigated and ongoing political disasters from Baghdad to Paris are largely of the West's own making. And now Trump seems ready to pursue these same globalist follies.

    Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick- please take a moment to examine and acknowledge the vast and inexcusable damage done to the Muslim world (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Afghanistan, Libya, Iran and Yemen) by the advanced, intelligent, bomb-dropping Judeo-Christian world.

    How about a little balance? Why not look at the big picture?

    Since 2001, Zionized Western 'democracies' have killed millions and displaced millions more of these so-called 'Islamic extremists' as well as their families. But these Muslim states sought no war with America. Yet they now lay in ruins.

    Doesn't then some of the official policies of several 'leading' Western democracies qualify as extreme? Millions believe so.

    As for 'terrorism', the civilian kill ratio presently favors glorious, free, nuclear-equipped, Anglo-Zionist empire by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

    What does that tell you?

    Ongoing, entrenched Zio-American foreign policy is a vast criminal enterprise that has rightfully earned the moniker 'genocidal'.

    for ‘terrorism’, the civilian kill ratio presently favors glorious, free, nuclear-equipped, Anglo-Zionist empire by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

    My gizmatron came up with 6927.325 to 1.

    Read More
  46. @Avery
    {If you expect a reasonable answer, you may want to consider asking a reasonable question.}

    You are unable to answer my question, because there is nothing in what either Hopkins or McHugh wrote that can be considered 'extremist' by anyone other than a loon.

    {P.S.: Trolls get laughed at and eventually people start to ignore them. You’re getting close.}


    I am really worried now, but I'll do my best to cross the threshold.

    You must understand that certain posters believe that, regardless of the evidence, anytime a Muslim or group of Muslims commits acts of violence in the West (against non-Muslims) that it is the West’s fault, that they are merely pawns of Western intelligence agencies/false flag, or they are “fake” Muslims since “real” Muslims would never harm a fly. They are rigid ideologues on this subject and really can’t be reasoned with.

    And I know how the Jewish questions ties in to all this and will be the first to condemn our reckless foreign policy in the Middle East and the associated death toll, but that doesn’t grant Muslims license to enter the West as so called refugees and kill and bomb Western citizens when they are being showered with smart phones, apartments, clothes, food, medical care and good will.

    I just wonder if they would still serve as Allah’s excuse makers if one of their dear loved ones were ever ruthlessly cut down by a Muslim in a terrorist attack.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    I understand, better than most.

    I am of Armenian descent.
    Armenian Apostolic Church Christian.
    The first nation to officially adopt Christianity in 301 AD.

    I understand.
  47. @KenH
    You must understand that certain posters believe that, regardless of the evidence, anytime a Muslim or group of Muslims commits acts of violence in the West (against non-Muslims) that it is the West's fault, that they are merely pawns of Western intelligence agencies/false flag, or they are "fake" Muslims since "real" Muslims would never harm a fly. They are rigid ideologues on this subject and really can't be reasoned with.

    And I know how the Jewish questions ties in to all this and will be the first to condemn our reckless foreign policy in the Middle East and the associated death toll, but that doesn't grant Muslims license to enter the West as so called refugees and kill and bomb Western citizens when they are being showered with smart phones, apartments, clothes, food, medical care and good will.

    I just wonder if they would still serve as Allah's excuse makers if one of their dear loved ones were ever ruthlessly cut down by a Muslim in a terrorist attack.

    I understand, better than most.

    I am of Armenian descent.
    Armenian Apostolic Church Christian.
    The first nation to officially adopt Christianity in 301 AD.

    I understand.

    Read More
  48. I just wonder if they would still serve as Allah’s excuse makers if one of their dear loved ones were ever ruthlessly cut down by a Muslim in a terrorist attack.

    You want some lessons in excuse making? Just read some of the the comments on the USS Liberty articles.

    BTW, isn’t “Allah” just another name for “Yahweh” or “Jehovah”? The Christian and atheist excuse makers aren’t exactly shirkers in the apologist arenas either, so yer point is?

    Muslims are merely the current enemy do jour and we practically never heard of ‘em until the old USSR failed to provide a source of “enemies.” That oughta suggest sumpin, no?

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH

    You want some lessons in excuse making? Just read some of the the comments on the USS Liberty articles.
     
    Meaning what? If people are making excuses for Israel then they should be strongly condemned since that was a premeditated attack designed on a U.S. vessel in international waters. The U.S. should still militarily retaliate against Israel to avenge the 34 dead and 171 wounded. It was no case of mistaken identity.

    Muslims are merely the current enemy do jour
     
    Well it seems a growing number of Muslims both in and out of the West relish that role and are intent on making Westerners their enemy du jour by their statements and actions. The pre-packaged talking points about Muslims behaving badly only because of the 2003 invasion of Iraq loses currency when you consider Coptic Christians of Egypt had nothing to do with the invasion, but are being kidnapped and murdered by Muslims. Pakistani Muslim rape gangs in the U.K. date back to the 1980's when they started preying on Sikh girls. Muslim no-go zones and intransigence in Western Europe pre-dates the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

    Then there's the conflicts in Lebanon and Serbia. Christians in those countries didn't bomb, invade or molest Muslims in any way. Even the U.S. government aided the Muslim KLA cutthroats by bombing the Christian Serbs.

    No doubt our meddlesome foreign policy has complicated relations even further, but Muslims have a long and distinguished record of not playing well with non-Muslims.

    , @anon

    and we practically never heard of ‘em until the old USSR failed to provide a source of “enemies.”
     
    c. 1000 years of permanent conflict, slave raids and attempted conquest followed by a lull for couple of hundred years due to western technology
  49. Grrr…”du” not “do”!!

    Anyway, yer friend admitted it’s really worried. Obviously doesn’t take much to scare it. No wonder there seem to be so many threats so much of the time. Maybe ya oughta tell the little victim that it really ain’t all that important, and if it feels threatened, to just not worry it’s poor little head over it.

    Read More
  50. But in the birthplace of the English-speaking world’s liberties, this of course led to police reports against Katie Hopkins.

    I saw a recently produced documentary just the other day where a Muslim radical in Britain gave a tour of a London park to a journalist, showing him exactly where the adulterers will be stoned to death in public when Sharia becomes the law of the UK. And they’re worried about Katie Hopkins. But the beheadings and stonings in London will likely not happen.

    To leftists in Britain, the radical vein of Islam is a problem to be dealt with in the future. The immediate problem for British leftists is to disconnect traditional Britons from their cultural origins by whatever social or legal means possible. Culture is the main obstacle for the left, it always has been, because it connects people to the past, and loyalties to the past can’t be trusted. It doesn’t matter which culture…any culture, as all cultures are a barrier to globalism…but since British culture is still the dominant culture in the UK, it has to be dealt with first.

    Because British culture has devolved into the celebration of weakness and non-confrontation, however, it’s destruction will be far less violent than the left’s eventual destruction (or attempted destruction) if Islamic culture in Britain. The violent response from Islam will bring about (“justify”) a Stalinist style totalitarianism in Britain where the left can finally disconnect Muslims from their culture and past.

    And won’t that be nice.

    Read More
  51. Globalist use the Number Game to fool peoples around the world.

    Globalists say if a nation has a certain population, that NUMBER = NATION.

    So, if Nation A has 50 million people of A-ethnicity, that nation MUST maintain that number in order to ‘survive’ as that nation. So, if the population is anticipated to decline to 40 million, it has to get 10 million people to maintain the magic number of 50 million. So, numbers trump ethnicity. According to this view, Nation A with 40 million people of A-ethnicity is less A-ish than Nation A with 40 million people of A-ethnicity and 10 million people of B-ethnicity.

    Take Poland. Its population is 40 million. Suppose Poland’s population is destined to decline to 20 million in 100 yrs. Now, a sane person will say Poland will be Poland whether it has 40 million or 20 million since Poles live in Poland. But globalists will differ and say 20 million people(even if non-Polish) must be added to keep Poland Polish. So, Poland is essentially a number. According to globalists, a Poland that is 20 million Polish and 20 million Nigerian is more Polish than a Poland that is all Polish at 20 million. Indeed, by globalist rules, a Poland that is 40 million Nigerian(with no Poles) is more Polish than a Poland that is 20 or 30 million all Polish.

    Globalism says there is no deep connection of ethnicity, territory, and history for a nation. Anyone who barges into Poland has a ‘human right’ to be Polish. So, if 10 million Nigerians barge into Poland for gibs-me-free-stuff, they are Polish. And if real Poles condemn such invasion and demand that the Negroes return to Nigeria, they are un-Polish since such ‘xenophobia’ is not what ‘European values’ are all about.

    Using this globalist logic, we could argue that Jews were not Jews after WWII. After all, if a people are defined by a number, then Jews were no longer Jews since they lost millions in the Holocaust, anywhere from 4 to 6 million. Let’s assume the number of Jewish dead in WWII is 6 million.

    Now, by some estimates, the Jewish population of Europe prior to WWII & Holocaust was 10 million. So, Jewishness = 10 million people. Since 6 million were lost in the war & extermination, it means Jews were no longer Jewish since 6 million were gone and the magic # of 10 million was lost. In order for Jews to be Jewish again, the 6 million losses have to filled in by any bunch of people. So, using globalist logic, Jews should have recruited 6 million gentiles to become ‘New Jews’ in order for Jews to be Jewish once again. And since Poles lost 3 million in the law, they had to get 3 million more people(even if non-Polish) to be Polish again.

    Now, you see how stupid such logic is. Whether there are 1 million Jews, 3 million Jews, 5 million Jews, or 10 million Jews, the fact of Jewishness isn’t about statistics but ethnics. If a Jewish nation has 1 million Jews or 10 million Jews, it is Jewish if Jews are the predominant ethnic group of the nation. If Nigeria has 100 million people and if all of them die due to some epidemic, it is not Nigeria again if 100 million Hindus or Russians resettle it. It will be New India or New Russia.

    But globalists are playing a clever numbers game in persuading nations that their essence and identity are pegged to some demographic magic number. So, if Japan currently has 100 million, it must maintain that number in order to remain Japan. If the population goes down to 70 million, that ain’t Japan no more. It needs 30 million additional people — even if non-Asian and disruptive to Japanese society — in order for Japan to remain Japanese.

    Globalism is controlled largely by Jews, and if Jews want to use such logic, then we should say Jews in Europe are not Jewish since there are only 1.5 million Jews in current Europe. Since Jewish population of Europe was 10 million in 1939, there has to be 10 million Jews in Europe today in order for Jews to be Jews. So, what current Jews-in-Europe need to do is to turn 8.5 million gentiles into ‘New Jews’ in order to reach that magic number of 10 million.
    Only then will there be Jews in Europe again. Therefore, unless Jews accept 8.5 million gentiles as ‘New Jews’, there are no real Jews in Europe since demographic numerology says there must be 10 million Jews in Europe in order for Jews to ‘survive’ as Jews.
    Sounds crazy? Well, that’s what Jewish globalists tell goyim around the world.

    Don’t you believe it.

    Read More
  52. For all their faults, it seems Kohl, Thatcher, and Chirac were the last important Western European leaders.

    As the culture got dumber and more decadent, masses got dumber and more decadent, and politicians got shallower, pandering to idiot masses. We don’t just have pop culture but pop politics. We have politicians as celebrities or fans of celebrity culture: Obama, Trudeau, Blair, Cameron, May, Merkel, Macron, Hollande, etc.

    Old Culture is just museum piece. New culture is Pop or PC. Politics pander to celebrity-mania and Current Year platitudes, having to ‘tolerate’ whatever the globalists declare as ‘Tolerance of the Year’.

    It’s difficult to have serious politics when the culture is so shallow and values are so debased.

    When the British Queen has to pander to idiot fans of trashy Princess Di, much goes for politics as a whole. Dullard politicians like Hollande, May, and Merkel AND celebrity-politicians like Obama, Trudeau, and Macron are all part of some globo-fashion-show orchestrated by Soroses of the world.

    Read More
  53. @jacques sheete

    I just wonder if they would still serve as Allah’s excuse makers if one of their dear loved ones were ever ruthlessly cut down by a Muslim in a terrorist attack.
     
    You want some lessons in excuse making? Just read some of the the comments on the USS Liberty articles.

    BTW, isn't "Allah" just another name for "Yahweh" or "Jehovah"? The Christian and atheist excuse makers aren't exactly shirkers in the apologist arenas either, so yer point is?

    Muslims are merely the current enemy do jour and we practically never heard of 'em until the old USSR failed to provide a source of "enemies." That oughta suggest sumpin, no?

    You want some lessons in excuse making? Just read some of the the comments on the USS Liberty articles.

    Meaning what? If people are making excuses for Israel then they should be strongly condemned since that was a premeditated attack designed on a U.S. vessel in international waters. The U.S. should still militarily retaliate against Israel to avenge the 34 dead and 171 wounded. It was no case of mistaken identity.

    Muslims are merely the current enemy do jour

    Well it seems a growing number of Muslims both in and out of the West relish that role and are intent on making Westerners their enemy du jour by their statements and actions. The pre-packaged talking points about Muslims behaving badly only because of the 2003 invasion of Iraq loses currency when you consider Coptic Christians of Egypt had nothing to do with the invasion, but are being kidnapped and murdered by Muslims. Pakistani Muslim rape gangs in the U.K. date back to the 1980′s when they started preying on Sikh girls. Muslim no-go zones and intransigence in Western Europe pre-dates the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

    Then there’s the conflicts in Lebanon and Serbia. Christians in those countries didn’t bomb, invade or molest Muslims in any way. Even the U.S. government aided the Muslim KLA cutthroats by bombing the Christian Serbs.

    No doubt our meddlesome foreign policy has complicated relations even further, but Muslims have a long and distinguished record of not playing well with non-Muslims.

    Read More
  54. {…..Coptic Christians of Egypt had nothing to do with the invasion, but are being kidnapped and murdered by Muslims.}

    [Egypt bus attack: Christians 'chose death' over converting to Islam to save their lives]

    http://www.torontosun.com/2017/05/28/egypt-bus-attack-christians-chose-death-over-converting-to-islam-to-save-their-lives

    The preferred route of spreading Islam: convert or die.
    Centuries before ill-advised US meddling in Middle East.
    Centuries before US even existed.

    Read More
  55. @Mark Green
    This is a very disappointing article by a man who has shown great potential as an alt-right leader. In an uninspiring vein that is similar to what the great Pat Buchanan recently scribbled, Kirkpatrick laments "those who remain imprisoned by their own cowardice" vis-a-vis their failure to condemn Islamic fundamentalism for its 'extremism' and the 'indiscriminate bombings' that have killed hundreds in the West over the past 15 years. Hundreds of innocent civilians slaughtered.

    But it is Kirkpatrick who is showing cowardice.

    Yes, we can agree that 'Muslims' are (in general) not well-suited for life in our science-driven and nominally Christian civilization.

    At the same time, shouldn't we be willing to take a hard and honest look at the mistakes that we 'infidels' have committed which has given rise to Islamic extremism?

    Or is this topic, Mr. Kirkpatrick, too explosive?

    James Kirkpatrick--who fancies himself brave and outspoken--consistently downplays (or ignores completely) the US and British and French (and Zionist) roots of the mayhem that has birthed ISIS, created widespread death, misery, anarchy and suffering throughout the Middle East; and which has contributed directly the refugee crisis that is now engulfing much of Western Europe.

    Kirkpatrick prefers an easier route: ignore political causation and focus just on theology.

    Thus, he heaps scorn on an easy target: the excessive religiosity of the victims of our glorious 'democracy building' interventions.

    But how can we ignore the hundreds of thousand of dead Muslim civilians at the hands of NATO and Zio-America? Doesn't this carnage deserve at least a footnote?

    And what about the millions of civilians in Muslim-majority countries left homeless as a result of Washington's penchant for high-tech, missile-aided 'regime change'?

    Unimportant detail?

    Kirkpatrick's oversights are both dishonest and cowardly.

    In fact, deploring Muslims is secretly (and no so secretly) quite acceptable in the West. Only it's done with cant and virtue-signaling pretensions. But don't be fooled. The body-count speaks volumes.

    Indeed, when one does an actual inventory of slaughtered Muslims (and some non-Muslims) courtesy of the great and progressive democracies of America, Britain, France and Israel, their staggering numbers suggest that everyday Muslims are indeed quite expendable. Who gives a shit? Just kill these ragheads.

    Callous and commonplace remarks of this kind certainly cannot be uttered about blacks or Jews.

    And while leading Western democracies talk loudly about human rights, their actions manifest hate and brutality on a routine basis. It's called 'government policy'.

    What's taboo is revealing this hatefulness in rhetoric or conversation. Talk nice. But strike preemptively.

    In a similarly dishonest vein, the economic and cultural interests of non-elite whites in America and Europe are given little serious consideration. Thus the middle and white working classes are sinking towards oblivion. This decline is no accident. So let's not blame just the hapless Muslim refugees here--as undesirable as they may be. They, too, are mere pawns in a much larger chess game.

    And why doesn't Kirkpatrick and other crypto-neocons refer to these 'Muslims' by their country of origin?

    Why?

    Because it might remind people of the obvious:

    These destitute Muslims came here because our drones and missiles went there.

    The unmitigated and ongoing political disasters from Baghdad to Paris are largely of the West's own making. And now Trump seems ready to pursue these same globalist follies.

    Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick- please take a moment to examine and acknowledge the vast and inexcusable damage done to the Muslim world (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Afghanistan, Libya, Iran and Yemen) by the advanced, intelligent, bomb-dropping Judeo-Christian world.

    How about a little balance? Why not look at the big picture?

    Since 2001, Zionized Western 'democracies' have killed millions and displaced millions more of these so-called 'Islamic extremists' as well as their families. But these Muslim states sought no war with America. Yet they now lay in ruins.

    Doesn't then some of the official policies of several 'leading' Western democracies qualify as extreme? Millions believe so.

    As for 'terrorism', the civilian kill ratio presently favors glorious, free, nuclear-equipped, Anglo-Zionist empire by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

    What does that tell you?

    Ongoing, entrenched Zio-American foreign policy is a vast criminal enterprise that has rightfully earned the moniker 'genocidal'.

    Could not agree more.

    The jews, that criminal state called Israel and its slave, the USA. That is the real problem and why we are where we are today.

    The jews are destroying our great country, have been doing so, gradually, since WWII. Now that they have been in total control for a while we are at a point of exploding, at home and abroad with a foreign policy dictated to us by Israel.

    Good job. We need americans to wake up. And in the meantime, yes, of course, keep the muslims out.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    You are correct. However, when "push comes to shove", the Jews will side with the Moslems, as the tenets of their respective "cults" are remarkably similar. Both Judaism and Islam profess their own brands of cultural superiority, relegating non-adherents as "goy" and "infidels", to be either "done away with", or if they have some value, to be used for the benefit of each respective "cult", as third-class "citizens".
    There is one major difference between the Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran...their views on Christianity and Jesus Christ.
    The Jewish Talmud states that Jesus Christ is an apostate, boiling in excrement for eternity, while his mother Mary conceived Jesus by consummating with a Roman soldier.
    Islam, on the other hand, regards Jesus Christ as a great prophet--not the Son of God, but a great prophet, nevertheless, while his mother Mary is accorded a high honor within the Koran...
    Now which belief system is more hostile to Christianity? (I realize that there are moslem fanatics who want to see Christianity destroyed, but...)
    We need to start purging our country of ALL "dual nationality" and "dual citizenship" types by prohibiting ALL foreign citizenship. We could start with the forty-or-so congressmen and senators who hold dual citizenship with Israel. Let's not forget the supreme court justices, and the thousands of influential "policy wonks" who also have "dual citizenship" and hold high-level positions within our federal and state government agencies.
    "Draining the swamp" should start by prohibiting "dual citizenship" and deporting those who refuse to renounce their foreign ties...
  56. @windwaves
    Could not agree more.

    The jews, that criminal state called Israel and its slave, the USA. That is the real problem and why we are where we are today.

    The jews are destroying our great country, have been doing so, gradually, since WWII. Now that they have been in total control for a while we are at a point of exploding, at home and abroad with a foreign policy dictated to us by Israel.

    Good job. We need americans to wake up. And in the meantime, yes, of course, keep the muslims out.

    You are correct. However, when “push comes to shove”, the Jews will side with the Moslems, as the tenets of their respective “cults” are remarkably similar. Both Judaism and Islam profess their own brands of cultural superiority, relegating non-adherents as “goy” and “infidels”, to be either “done away with”, or if they have some value, to be used for the benefit of each respective “cult”, as third-class “citizens”.
    There is one major difference between the Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran…their views on Christianity and Jesus Christ.
    The Jewish Talmud states that Jesus Christ is an apostate, boiling in excrement for eternity, while his mother Mary conceived Jesus by consummating with a Roman soldier.
    Islam, on the other hand, regards Jesus Christ as a great prophet–not the Son of God, but a great prophet, nevertheless, while his mother Mary is accorded a high honor within the Koran…
    Now which belief system is more hostile to Christianity? (I realize that there are moslem fanatics who want to see Christianity destroyed, but…)
    We need to start purging our country of ALL “dual nationality” and “dual citizenship” types by prohibiting ALL foreign citizenship. We could start with the forty-or-so congressmen and senators who hold dual citizenship with Israel. Let’s not forget the supreme court justices, and the thousands of influential “policy wonks” who also have “dual citizenship” and hold high-level positions within our federal and state government agencies.
    “Draining the swamp” should start by prohibiting “dual citizenship” and deporting those who refuse to renounce their foreign ties…

    Read More
    • Replies: @windwaves
    just briefly, the enemy of Israel is not christianity right now, the real threat for that criminal state comes from muslim countries.

    Israel exploits the US in its attempt to manage that threat and continue its territorial expansion.

    I agree on "certain" dual citizenzhips to be eradicated, but only the Israel/US ones and a few other.

    Need to be selective. There are good countries/people out there and WE NEED THEM. However, like president Roosvelt (I think it was him) said, a jew is always a jew first and an american at some later point, may be.

    The point is that it will be a struggle to combat the suffocating control of the jews on this country.

    As to muslim, I have no problem with banning them, deporting, I am not sure it would truly address the problem however it would show determination, resolve. But more importantly our foreign policy needs dramatic changes, that is where solutions will be found ultimately. I do not a bit buy the arguments "muslims are not all bad". They hate us. When was the last time you saw and true, mass manifestation of solidarity by mulsims after a terror attack in the west ????

    Sorry, lots of ideas a bit to fast....
    , @windwaves
    40 or so congressmen/senators ? OMG. Disgusting.
  57. @anarchyst
    You are correct. However, when "push comes to shove", the Jews will side with the Moslems, as the tenets of their respective "cults" are remarkably similar. Both Judaism and Islam profess their own brands of cultural superiority, relegating non-adherents as "goy" and "infidels", to be either "done away with", or if they have some value, to be used for the benefit of each respective "cult", as third-class "citizens".
    There is one major difference between the Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran...their views on Christianity and Jesus Christ.
    The Jewish Talmud states that Jesus Christ is an apostate, boiling in excrement for eternity, while his mother Mary conceived Jesus by consummating with a Roman soldier.
    Islam, on the other hand, regards Jesus Christ as a great prophet--not the Son of God, but a great prophet, nevertheless, while his mother Mary is accorded a high honor within the Koran...
    Now which belief system is more hostile to Christianity? (I realize that there are moslem fanatics who want to see Christianity destroyed, but...)
    We need to start purging our country of ALL "dual nationality" and "dual citizenship" types by prohibiting ALL foreign citizenship. We could start with the forty-or-so congressmen and senators who hold dual citizenship with Israel. Let's not forget the supreme court justices, and the thousands of influential "policy wonks" who also have "dual citizenship" and hold high-level positions within our federal and state government agencies.
    "Draining the swamp" should start by prohibiting "dual citizenship" and deporting those who refuse to renounce their foreign ties...

    just briefly, the enemy of Israel is not christianity right now, the real threat for that criminal state comes from muslim countries.

    Israel exploits the US in its attempt to manage that threat and continue its territorial expansion.

    I agree on “certain” dual citizenzhips to be eradicated, but only the Israel/US ones and a few other.

    Need to be selective. There are good countries/people out there and WE NEED THEM. However, like president Roosvelt (I think it was him) said, a jew is always a jew first and an american at some later point, may be.

    The point is that it will be a struggle to combat the suffocating control of the jews on this country.

    As to muslim, I have no problem with banning them, deporting, I am not sure it would truly address the problem however it would show determination, resolve. But more importantly our foreign policy needs dramatic changes, that is where solutions will be found ultimately. I do not a bit buy the arguments “muslims are not all bad”. They hate us. When was the last time you saw and true, mass manifestation of solidarity by mulsims after a terror attack in the west ????

    Sorry, lots of ideas a bit to fast….

    Read More
  58. @anarchyst
    You are correct. However, when "push comes to shove", the Jews will side with the Moslems, as the tenets of their respective "cults" are remarkably similar. Both Judaism and Islam profess their own brands of cultural superiority, relegating non-adherents as "goy" and "infidels", to be either "done away with", or if they have some value, to be used for the benefit of each respective "cult", as third-class "citizens".
    There is one major difference between the Jewish Talmud and Islamic Koran...their views on Christianity and Jesus Christ.
    The Jewish Talmud states that Jesus Christ is an apostate, boiling in excrement for eternity, while his mother Mary conceived Jesus by consummating with a Roman soldier.
    Islam, on the other hand, regards Jesus Christ as a great prophet--not the Son of God, but a great prophet, nevertheless, while his mother Mary is accorded a high honor within the Koran...
    Now which belief system is more hostile to Christianity? (I realize that there are moslem fanatics who want to see Christianity destroyed, but...)
    We need to start purging our country of ALL "dual nationality" and "dual citizenship" types by prohibiting ALL foreign citizenship. We could start with the forty-or-so congressmen and senators who hold dual citizenship with Israel. Let's not forget the supreme court justices, and the thousands of influential "policy wonks" who also have "dual citizenship" and hold high-level positions within our federal and state government agencies.
    "Draining the swamp" should start by prohibiting "dual citizenship" and deporting those who refuse to renounce their foreign ties...

    40 or so congressmen/senators ? OMG. Disgusting.

    Read More
  59. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @jacques sheete

    I just wonder if they would still serve as Allah’s excuse makers if one of their dear loved ones were ever ruthlessly cut down by a Muslim in a terrorist attack.
     
    You want some lessons in excuse making? Just read some of the the comments on the USS Liberty articles.

    BTW, isn't "Allah" just another name for "Yahweh" or "Jehovah"? The Christian and atheist excuse makers aren't exactly shirkers in the apologist arenas either, so yer point is?

    Muslims are merely the current enemy do jour and we practically never heard of 'em until the old USSR failed to provide a source of "enemies." That oughta suggest sumpin, no?

    and we practically never heard of ‘em until the old USSR failed to provide a source of “enemies.”

    c. 1000 years of permanent conflict, slave raids and attempted conquest followed by a lull for couple of hundred years due to western technology

    Read More
  60. @Renoman
    Islam is a dangerous cult that must be eradicated.

    Islam is not a “cult,” an ephemeral gang of idiots and crazies led by David Koresh or Charles Manson, but a uniquely evil and baleful religion founded in the 7th Century by Muhammad, arguably the worst monster in all of history whose reign of terror and conquest, unlike that of Hitler and Lenin and Stalin and Mao and Pot Pot, has lasted almost 14 centuries and will soon destroy France, England, Germany, Sweden, Belgium, etc., unless the invasion of Muslims is ended and virtually all Muslims are expelled from Western Europe.

    Islam must be “eradicated.” There will soon be almost 2 billion Muslims living in some 40 Islamic countries and in Western Europe, the United States, Canada, Australia. Do you suggest that the U.S. and a few other nations bomb and invade and occupy all Muslims countries, including Pakistan, a country of 170 million people with nuclear weapons, emulating our great successes in Iraq and Afghanistan, and exterminate 60-70% of the male population?

    For Europe and North America, the transparent solution is total separation from Islam: an end to Muslim immigration, forever, and mass-expulsions/deportations if Muslims; no more wars and invasions and occupations; no women in combat boots in Muslim countries; no invite-the-world/invade-the-world in respect to Muslims and Islamic countries. But that will never happen.

    Read More
  61. anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @SolontoCroesus
    In the US, we are led to believe that Muslim terrorists attacked the World Trade Center in New York City, symbol of capitalism, and the Pentagon, symbol of American military might.
    A third plane that, we were told, was intended to attack the US Capitol, symbol of DEMOCRACY and FREEDOM, the ne plus ultra emblematic values of Americanism, somehow went astray and crashed into a strip-mining field in Pennsylvania.

    In France, we were told that Muslims were responsible for the attack on cartoonists who disrespected Islam.

    In England, we are told that ISIS attacked concertgoers who gathered to cheer as entertainers sing of "dicks so hard you can't walk" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffHUG5rv1Mo

    In Iran today, ISIS quickly claimed credit for attacking that nation's seat of government, its Parliament, where, even as representatives of the Iranian people were killed,


    "MPs continued scheduled sessions in another part of the complex. ."
     
    ISIS, who "were dressed as women in order to gain entry," Did the female garments have tzit tzit, one wonders?
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/07/shootings-iranian-parliament-khomeini-shrine

    There are no reports of ISIS having attacked sites or persons in Israel.

    So what do we have?

    Over the last 16 years in which The Free and Democratic World © has engaged in a war on terror to bring freedom and democracy to all people everywhere, the only attack on actual representatives of the people took place in Iran.

    When the World Trade Center in New York City was attacked on 9/11, US lawmakers responded by gathering to sing the nation's anthem, then clearing out of Washington, DC and going into hiding.

    The British responded by observing a minute of silence, then another few minutes of May fulminating, and then by hosting a reprise of a sexually explicit performance.

    So far, Iran's Parliament has responded by going about its business.

    Stay tuned.

    Were the Muslim grooming gangs in Rotherham really Jews ?
    Was Omar Mateen a Crypto Afghani Jew ?
    Were the truck attacks in Nice really perpetrated by a Jew ?
    Are the millions of Muslims flooding Europe and displacing the white Christian population really Jews pretending to be Muslims ?
    Is Omar Bashir a crypto Jew ?
    How about Pol Pot ? A crypto Jew also ??

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Let's focus on the activities of the Jewish here including of that Rabbi with NY based doctors who were cutting immigrants open and were taking their organs for delivery to Israel.
    Some board members and principles were diverting money from public fund to private school in NY state . The children of these well heeld well connected people were attending the private schools.



    Do you remember the URBAN MOVING COMPANY? The owners knew something and escaped to Israel.


    What about Phillip Jack who already knew about the Anthrax attacks about to come by mail but well before the public had any idea . FBI investigated him but let him go. He was the guy found to sneak into anthrax labs at night after he was fired from the job .
  62. anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @jacques sheete
    So these two chicks lost their jobs for expressing their extremist views on Islam.

    How many US politicians have lost their jobs for their realistic views on Israel? E.g., Cynthia McKinney, anyone?

    Cynthia McKinney is borderline mentally retarded.

    She thinks The United States government executed 5,000 black males in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina .

    She cares about 1,000 Muslims killed in Gaza but remained silent over the hundreds of thousands killed by Islamic regimes in Sudan , Mauritania, Somalia , Morocco and Indonesia during her term in government.

    Read More
  63. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Allowing Muslim to exist in the west is either the greatest act of stupidity or the highest treason in history.

    Read More
  64. @Renoman
    Islam is a dangerous cult that must be eradicated.

    All religions should be eradicated. Only the mentally retarded can believe in a sky god who hears their mumblings. Idiotic.

    Read More
  65. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Here’s a recent Breitbart headline: “Poland: Refusing to Import Muslims is Only Proven Counter-Terror Method.” The story was published the same day Miss McHugh was fired.–Katie McHugh’s Expendable Labor

    https://www.counterpunch.org/…/katie-mchughs-expendable-labor/

    Most likely she was asking for raise or some accommodation with her post pregnancy maternity needs. The other possibility is that Breitbart found out that anybody could write blog she was writing , even a half alive dead blonde could. So they got rid of her.

    Read More
  66. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @anonymous
    Were the Muslim grooming gangs in Rotherham really Jews ?
    Was Omar Mateen a Crypto Afghani Jew ?
    Were the truck attacks in Nice really perpetrated by a Jew ?
    Are the millions of Muslims flooding Europe and displacing the white Christian population really Jews pretending to be Muslims ?
    Is Omar Bashir a crypto Jew ?
    How about Pol Pot ? A crypto Jew also ??

    Let’s focus on the activities of the Jewish here including of that Rabbi with NY based doctors who were cutting immigrants open and were taking their organs for delivery to Israel.
    Some board members and principles were diverting money from public fund to private school in NY state . The children of these well heeld well connected people were attending the private schools.

    Do you remember the URBAN MOVING COMPANY? The owners knew something and escaped to Israel.

    What about Phillip Jack who already knew about the Anthrax attacks about to come by mail but well before the public had any idea . FBI investigated him but let him go. He was the guy found to sneak into anthrax labs at night after he was fired from the job .

    Read More
  67. @jacques sheete
    So these two chicks lost their jobs for expressing their extremist views on Islam.

    How many US politicians have lost their jobs for their realistic views on Israel? E.g., Cynthia McKinney, anyone?

    How many US politicians have lost their jobs for their realistic views on Israel? E.g., Cynthia McKinney, anyone?

    How about Senator Percy and Senator Stevenson in Illinois? Senator Abourezk of South Dakota quit in disgust because of Israel’s occupation of the US congress. Senator Fulbright of Arkansas. I can go on. And lastly, George H. W. Bush, the 41st President.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
While other top brass played press agents for the administration’s war, William Odom told the truth about Iraq—though few listened.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?